BETA


2023/0363(COD) Amending certain financial services and investment support Regulations as regards certain reporting requirements

Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON SAUDARGAS Paulius (icon: PPE PPE) BAJADA Thomas (icon: S&D S&D), ZIJLSTRA Auke (icon: PfE PfE), NESCI Denis (icon: ECR ECR), LØKKEGAARD Morten (icon: RE RE), OHISALO Maria (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SARAMO Jussi (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), AUST René (icon: ESN ESN)
Former Responsible Committee ECON KARAS Othmar (icon: EPP EPP)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Former Committee Opinion AFCO
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114, TFEU 173-p3, TFEU 175-p3

Events

2024/10/21
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
2024/09/12
   EP - SAUDARGAS Paulius (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/07/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2024/06/21
   ECB - European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
2024/03/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2024/03/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.

The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:

Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements

Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.

According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.

In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.

Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.

Scope

The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.

In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.

Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System

The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.

By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:

- a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;

- a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;

- a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and

- a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.

ESAs opinions

The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:

- remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;

- ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;

- ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;

- ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.

Detection of systematic risks

In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.

Use of digital technology

The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.

Documents
2024/02/14
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2024/02/07
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
2024/02/05
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
2024/02/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:

Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements

The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.

Scope

Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.

In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.

Review of the reporting requirements

The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.

In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.

Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System

The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.

All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.

ESAs opinions

The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.

Detection of systematic risks

In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.

Use of digital technology

The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.

Documents
2024/01/29
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2024/01/29
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2024/01/10
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/12/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2023/11/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2023/10/25
   EP - KARAS Othmar (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2023/10/17
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: reporting requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. Reporting requirements can however also impose disproportionate burdens on stakeholders, particularly affecting SMEs and micro-companies, also given organisational and technological developments that call for original reporting requirements to be adjusted. Their cumulation over time can result in redundant, duplicating or obsolete obligations, inefficient frequency and timing, or inadequate methods of collection.

Streamlining reporting obligations and reducing the administrative burden are therefore a priority.

Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board, Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions, Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority and Regulation (EU) 2021/523 establishing the InvestEU Programme contain a certain number of reporting requirements which should be simplified.

In line with the Commission’s Communication on ‘ Long-term competitiveness of the EU: looking beyond 2030 ’, this proposal is part of a first package of measures to rationalise reporting requirements. This is a step in a process looking comprehensively at existing reporting requirements, with a view to assess their continued relevance and to make them more efficient.

CONTENT: the proposal seeks to rationalise reporting requirements in headline ambition ‘An economy that works for people’.

The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 1092/2010, Regulation (EU) 1093/2010, Regulation (EU) 1094/2010 and Regulation (EU) 1095/2010 set out how authorities overseeing the EU financial sector may share with each other information that they have obtained in carrying out their duties.

In the area of the internal market and specifically the financial services sector , the proposal will facilitate the exchange of information between authorities overseeing the financial sector and the consolidation of reporting currently performed under various requirements. The reporting requirements concern financial institutions and other financial market participants.

The proposal for the exchange of information between authorities overseeing the financial sector aims to avoid duplicative reporting requests where multiple authorities have the power to collect certain data from financial institutions or other market participants (whether the authorities already collect it or not) but lack the explicit legal basis to share it among themselves. The proposal is complemented by a mandate for the authorities to regularly review and remove reporting requirements that have become redundant or obsolete for instance due to enhanced information exchange.

The proposal will also increase the ability of the Commission to obtain data to prepare policies and carry out impact assessments and evaluations.

To further improve the utility of the reported data, the proposal also aims to support the use of information for the purpose of research and innovation in financial services, by allowing, under strict conditions, the sharing of information held by authorities with financial institutions, researchers, and other entities with a legitimate interest. The proposal will permit authorities to share relevant information obtained as part of their duties, subject to the safeguards on personal data, intellectual property rights and business confidentiality.

In the policy areas of competitiveness, growth, employment, innovation, social resilience, cohesion and strategic investments , the proposal aims to rationalise the requirements for reporting on implementation of the InvestEU Programme. The requirements cover the following sectors: access to finance for SMEs and investment support to companies in sustainable infrastructure, research, innovation and digitisation, and social investment and skills.

The proposal changes the reporting frequency from biannual to annual, which reduces the workload and administrative burden across all InvestEU windows (i.e. Sustainable infrastructure, SMEs, Research, innovation and digitisation, social investment and skills), with negligible implications on implementation of the programme.

Documents

Votes

A9-0026/2024 – Othmar Karas – Commission proposal and amendment #

2024/03/12 Outcome: +: 580, 0: 32, -: 2
DE FR IT ES PL NL RO CZ HU SE PT BE BG AT IE EL SK HR FI DK LV LT SI EE LU MT CY
Total
86
72
65
55
46
28
22
19
18
19
19
19
16
17
13
15
13
12
10
11
7
8
8
7
5
3
1
icon: PPE PPE
154

Hungary PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
127

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: Renew Renew
87

Poland Renew

1

Hungary Renew

2
3

Belgium Renew

2

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Greece Renew

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
64

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Germany ECR

1

France ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ECR

For (1)

3

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

1
icon: ID ID
51

Czechia ID

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ID

3

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ID

Abstain (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
32

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Czechia The Left

1

Sweden The Left

For (1)

1

Portugal The Left

4

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Denmark The Left

1
icon: NI NI
36

Germany NI

2

France NI

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

For (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

1
AmendmentsDossier
70 2023/0363(COD)
2024/01/10 ECON 70 amendments...
source: 757.995

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/6
name
AUST René
group
Europe for Sovereign Nations
abbr
ESN
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
events/9
date
2024-10-21T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en
New
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-350-TA-9-2024-0128_en.docx
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SARAMO Jussi
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: SAUDARGAS Paulius date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2023-10-25T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/3/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/4/type
Old
Committee Opinion
New
Former Committee Opinion
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/4
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2024-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=61188&j=0&l=en title: SP(2024)350
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
procedure/Other legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159
New
Rules of Procedure EP 165
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61188&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 580 votes to 2, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • Financial institutions and other entities active on financial markets are required to report a wide range of information to enable Union and national authorities overseeing the financial system to monitor risks, ensure financial stability and market integrity, and protect investors and consumers of financial services in the Union.
  • According to the amended text, the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Facilitating the sharing and reuse of information collected by the authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, while safeguarding data protection, professional secrecy and intellectual property, should reduce the burden on reporting entities and on authorities by avoiding duplicative requests.
  • Scope
  • The proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are introduced with a view to amending Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • By 2 years from the date of entry into force of this amending Regulation, all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. This system should include:
  • - a common data dictionary to ensure consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation;
  • - a joint repository of reporting and disclosure requirements, of the descriptions of the collected data and of the authorities that hold it;
  • - a central data space including the technical design for collecting and exchanging information; and
  • - a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate instances of double reporting, and redundant or obsolete reporting or disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force in order to:
  • - remove redundant or obsolete reporting and disclosure requirements in Union law or the national transposition of Union law by Member States;
  • - ensure consistent reporting and disclosure requirements across sector-specific, as well as cross-sector, legislation;
  • - ensure proportionality in reporting and disclosure requirements with respect to the nature, size and complexity of the reporting entity;
  • - ensure that complying with reporting and disclosure requirements are commensurate with the added value to fulfilling the tasks and objectives of the Authority.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/2
date
2024-02-14T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5424)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES5424/2023
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.
  • Scope
  • Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Review of the reporting requirements
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/2
date
2024-02-14T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5424)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES5424/2023
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.
  • Scope
  • Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Review of the reporting requirements
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.
  • Scope
  • Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Review of the reporting requirements
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.
  • Scope
  • Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Review of the reporting requirements
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic Affairs adopted the report by Othmar KARAS (EPP, AT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Streamlining of reporting and disclosure requirements
  • The amended text stressed reporting and disclosure requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements, in order to ensure that they fulfil their intended purpose, to limit the administrative burden and to avoid undue duplication, not least for the regulatory and supervisory authorities of smaller financial jurisdictions. Reporting and disclosure requirements can also impose a disproportionate burden on entities, particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises or micro-enterprises.
  • Scope
  • Members propose that the proposed amendments should also cover anti-money laundering authorities, resolution authorities and the supervisory functions of central banks. Accordingly, amendments are proposed to Council Regulation (EU) 1024/2013, Regulation (EU) 806/2014 and the Regulation establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority.
  • In order to foster the exchange of information across the entire financial sector, it is proposed that all authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector, including the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the Single Resolution Board (SRB), as well as all respective competent, supervisory and resolution authorities in the Member States, should be included in the scope of this amending Regulation.
  • Review of the reporting requirements
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should regularly review the reporting and disclosure requirements and propose, where appropriate, to streamline and remove redundant, obsolete or disproportionate requirements in relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards. The European Supervisory Authorities should coordinate this work via the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities.
  • In addition, peer reviews of competent authorities should also be conducted to improve the effectiveness and the degree of convergence of those requirements. Both the tasks under the common supervisory culture as well as the peer reviews should be carried out on a standing basis, for which more human and material resources should be allocated as necessary.
  • Establishment of a Single Integrated Reporting System
  • The amended text stressed the need to enforce the ‘report once’ principle more consistently in the Union. All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector should only request information from financial institutions or other reporting entities if they have not already reported that information to other authorities. If information has already been reported to an authority, other authorities, should be able to request that information from that authority directly as opposed to collecting the same information, thereby putting an end to so-called double reporting.
  • All authorities responsible for supervision in the financial sector in the Union should establish a Single Integrated Reporting System. That system should include a common data dictionary that ensures consistency and clarity of reporting requirements and data standardisation, a joint repository of requested and obtained data, a central data space for efficient data collection and exchange as well as a permanent single contact point for entities to indicate double, obsolete or redundant reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • ESAs opinions
  • The European Supervisory Authorities and the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority should therefore not only review regulatory and implementing technical standards, but should also provide opinions on ongoing ordinary legislative procedures and legislative acts already in force.
  • Detection of systematic risks
  • In order to facilitate the detection, monitoring, prevention and mitigation of systemic risks to financial stability, the ESRB should have access to relevant information from the ESAs and the ECB by default. In that way, systematic risks could be better detected ex ante, as opposed to ex post, due to more rigorous request and sharing procedures.
  • Use of digital technology
  • The European Supervisory Authorities should assess policy options to further integrate reporting processes from a procedural and content perspective. They should duly assess opportunities arising from an increase in the use of digital technology to promote effective and efficient formats that embrace metrics, methods, and parameters, which will foster the competitiveness of the financial sector.
docs/3
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/7
date
2024-03-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0128_EN.html title: T9-0128/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
New
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
events/6
date
2024-02-07T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
events/5
date
2024-02-05T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/4
name
MACMANUS Chris
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/2
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-02-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0026_EN.html title: A9-0026/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
events/2
date
2024-01-29T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-01-29T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts
  • date: 2024-01-29T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
committees/0/shadows/2
name
LAMBERTS Philippe
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
docs/1
date
2024-01-10T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-757995_EN.html title: PE757.995
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs
  • date: 2023-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-757366_EN.html title: PE757.366 type: Committee draft report body: EP
committees/0/shadows/1
name
POULSEN Erik
group
Renew Europe group
abbr
Renew
committees/2/opinion
False
forecasts
  • date: 2024-01-29T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
committees/0/shadows/1
name
NESCI Denis
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
committees/3/opinion
False
events/1
date
2023-11-20T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • ECON/9/13510
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision