Activities of Salvatore TATARELLA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system which can provide easily accessible information at the global level, acquiring and analysing information and extracting precise and useful data for those involved in environmental monitoring and civil protection following earthquakes, tsunamis or environmental disasters; observes that, in light of the ‘Europe 2020’ objectives, GMES is an essential resource in combating climate change at the global level;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. Stresses the importance of the GMES programme and its potential contribution to achievement of the 'Europe 2020' objectives by indicating how to combat climate change and providing background information on the green economy and investment in technology and infrastructures;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)

3b. Acknowledges the current utilisation of the GMES emergency management programme in practice, particularly in response to floods or humanitarian disasters;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Sergio BERLATO

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)

3c. Stresses that the GMES programme is not only infrastructural in nature but also targeted at environmental protection and safety systems; these are the priorities of the European Union and all Member States strongly committed to environmental policy;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4

4. Recalls that the Commission’s proposed Financial Framework for the period 2014 - 2020 excludes funding for the GMES programme completely, and asks the Member States to continue to cover the costs of the launch and annual maintenance of the programme; considers that this would lead to a potential temporary suspension of the programme itself, an interruption in data provision as a result, and a dependence on non-European space infrastructure;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Sergio BERLATO

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Underlines that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s operational maintenance costs for the period 2014 - 2020 will average EUR 850 million per year;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Sergio BERLATO, Elisabetta GARDINI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

6. Considers that the adequate use of space programmes would lead to significant savings for the sectors involved, especially EU environment policy;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)

6a. Acknowledges the social benefits to users of GMES services, for whom continuity and sustainability are of the essence if they are to derive maximum advantage from the observation infrastructures offered by the programme;

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2148(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Sergio BERLATO, Elisabetta GARDINI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)

7a. Reiterates that inclusion of GMES funding in the 2014 - 2020 multiannual financial framework would save wasting investment to date in the seventh framework programme of research in the field of services and information.

2011/10/06
Committee: ENVI

2011/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)

13a. Calls on the Commission to review the relevant legislation with a view to introducing a ban on offshore exploration and drilling in waters less than 80 kilometres away from marine national parks and nature reserves;

2011/05/23
Committee: ENVI

2011/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 b (new)

13b. Calls on the Commission to take due account, when assessing the impact of offshore projects, of the adverse impact that offshore hydrocarbon activities have on tourism in the areas affected;

2011/05/23
Committee: ENVI

2011/2056(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential; ~~insists therefore that reduction targets should be set to stabilise material use and proposes an annual material EU efficiency target of 3%;~~

2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)

- having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’(COM(2011)0112),

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)

- having regard to the Commission Communication "A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy by 2050"(COM(2011)0112), and the statement that “The EU already has legislation in place that ensures a 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared with 1990 levels. It maintains its conditional offer of a 30% reduction, provided there are comparable reductions by other developed countries and appropriate contributions from developing countries.”

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)

- having regard to the Commission Communication on Energy Efficiency Plan 2011(COM(2011)0109),

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)

- having regard to Council Conclusions of June 2010 agreeing that the Commission should “conduct more detailed analysis on the policy options and costs and benefits, including at Member State level, as appropriate."

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Martin CALLANAN, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Holger KRAHMER, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Recital A

A. whereas the EU's climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre- industrial level; whereas the climate package adopted in December 2008 represents a first step towards ensuring EU action in line with this objective; whereas countries representing some 80% of global emissions have pledged to reduce emissions, although the Parties to the UNFCCC acknowledged in Cancun that current pledges are insufficient to meet the 2°C objective,. Taking into account that the Cancun conference did not reach a global agreement to turn these pledges into legally binding targets and the European Union is still the only large economic community having adopted unilateral emissions reduction targets.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Motion for a resolution
Recital A

A. whereas the EU's and global climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre- industrial level; whereas the climate package adopted in December 2008 represents a first step towards ensuring EU action in line with this objective; whereas countries representing some 80% of global emissions have pledged to reduce emissions, although the Parties to the UNFCCC acknowledged in Cancun that current pledges are insufficient to meet the 2°C objective,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B

B. whereas, according to the European Environmental Agency, in 2009 the EU's greenhouse gas emissions were 17.3% lower than in 1990; however stresses that this includes the effect of the economic crisis,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Recital B

B. whereas, according to the European Environmental Agency, in 2009 the EU's greenhouse gas emissions were 17.3% lower than in 1990, due to the effects of the economic crisis.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)

Ba. whereas the International Energy Agency has estimated that the EU's share of the global emissions was 13% in 2010 and will be 9% in 2030,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)

Bb. whereas action by the EU alone will not be enough to combat climate change,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D

D. whereas, due to the economic crisis, ~~emissions from~~the production and investment ability of sectors in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) as well as their emissions have been considerably lower than projected, ~~and below the level of initial allocation,~~

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D

D. whereas, due to the economic crisis, emissions from sectors in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) have been considerably lower than projected, and below the level of initial allocation, but also the investment ability of these sectors has been reduced at the same time.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)

Da. whereas the general objective of the Emissions Trading Directive (2003/87/EC) is to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost- effective and economically efficient manner in order to combat climate change,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

E. whereas the temporary lower carbon price will have a ~~significant~~n impact on investment decisions and will reduce the revenues from auctioning allowances for financing climate action in the EU and in developing countries,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Peter LIESE, Richard SEEBER, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

E. whereas the lower carbon price w~~ill~~ould have a significant impact on investment decisions and will reduce the revenues from auctioning allowances for financing climate action in the EU and in developing countries, so the impact will have to be closely examined;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)

Ea. considering that the main purpose of the climate and energy package is that of reducing emission in the most cost effective way.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Peter LIESE, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital F

F. whereas, according to the Commission, stepping up effort to 30% while the other countries retain their low pledges would have a limited incremental impact on the EU's energy intensive industry, as long as the adequate energy efficiency measures are deployed and the special measures for industry stay in place, where needed.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F d (new)

Fd. whereas the European Union’s credibility would be enhanced if an intermediate step was first taken and, at the same time, legislation was adopted that mapped out the specific path to be followed if the international situation further improved;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Martin CALLANAN, Sergio BERLATO, Elisabetta GARDINI, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)

Fa. whereas in the absence of a global agreement assuring a level playing field, European industry would be still exposed to unfair competition.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)

F a. whereas without a global agreement and the cooperation of major CO2 producers (USA, China, India) the EU cannot succeed in having any influence at all on the climate changes currently occurring;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Welcomes~~Notes that the Commission Communication ~~demonstrating~~concludes that stepping up to a 30% target is technically feasible and economically affordable; when the conditions are right,

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. notes however that the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 does not suggest to set new 2020 targets and on the contrary states that " the priority remains to achieve all the targets already set for 2020".

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the Council, to use every means possible to achieve a global agreement;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)

1b. Welcomes the Commission Communication on the 2050 Roadmap setting long-term targets reconfirming the EU objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% by 2050 in order to keep climate change below 2°C.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. Calls for the Commission based on Communication on the 2050 Roadmap to come forward with proposals to move to a 3025% greenhouse gas reduction target for 2020 a~~s soon as possible, and at the latest by the end of 2011~~nd implementation a long-term strategy up to 2050 for gas reduction target and a coherent targets for 2020 as soon as possible;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. Confirms that if the conditions agreed upon by the European Council are met, the EU will consider all possible options that can help to reach 25% target for 2020 in a cost-effective way.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Peter LIESE, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. Calls on the Commission in this regard to work towards a structural overhaul of EU climate diplomacy which, through the involvement of the new European External Action Service and the High Representative, should seek to present a clearer EU profile on climate policy, bringing a new dynamic to the international climate negotiations and encouraging partners throughout the world to also introduce binding reductions in emissions;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Peter LIESE, Holger KRAHMER, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)

2b. Points out that the EU’s main priority should be to convince other partners in the world of the merits of making their own commitments on reductions that may even exceed those set out in the Copenhagen Agreement;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Recalls that, according to IPCC 4AR, ,to have a 50% chance of limiting climate change to 2°C industrialised countries need to reduce their emissions by 25-40% by 2020; points out that the EU's current target is not in line with its 2°C objective; ; in accordance with the findings of the IPCC in its Fourth Assessment Report and more recent studies, developed countries as a group should reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 25 to 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 while developing countries as a group should achieve a substantial deviation below the currently predicted emissions growth rate, in the order of 15 to 30% by 2020;1 __________________ 1 Environment Council Conclusions of 14 March 2011.

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Notes that the European Council in February 2011 has recognised that further reductions in the range of 80-95% by 2050 as compared to 1990 are necessary; ~~points out that a linear trajectory between 2009 and 2050 would result in a 2020 target in the range of 34-38% as compared to 1990;~~in the context of necessary reductions according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by developed countries as a group.1 __________________ 1 Roadmap 2050,p. 13

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Recognizes that a cost - effective approach to long - term targets foresees a non - linear pathway with a 25% target in 2020, a 40% target in 2030, a 60% target in 2040 to a 80% target in 2050.1 __________________ 1 Roadmap 2050

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Sergio BERLATO, Paolo BARTOLOZZI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5a. Notes that the European Council is not in favour of stepping up to a 30% reduction target without the participation of developed countries and other major emitters of greenhouse gases in an ambitious international agreement on climate change;

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Peter LIESE, Richard SEEBER, Sergio BERLATO, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)

5b. Recalls that in the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 the Commission indicates that progress an a global scale is the only way to solve the problem of climate change, and the EU must continue to engage its partners.1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 13

2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. Reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share ofn the global ~~2°C compatible carbon budget, and that delaying emissions reductions~~level. The EU per capita share must however be considered inc re~~ases the cumulative share significantly;~~lation to per capita shares in a global context.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Bogusław SONIK, Elisabetta GARDINI, Martin CALLANAN, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)

6 a. Recalls that the EU with little more than 10% of global emissions will not be able to tackle climate change on its own.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. Stresses that delaying global and European climate action would result in higher costs for achieving the 2050 target due to stranded investment in high-carbon capital stock and slower technological learning;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)

7a. Notes that we have to take in consideration the different economic assessment in different Member States and sectors; recognizes that a too fast acceleration in emission reduction would lead to a lock - in of more efficient but still carbon intensive technologies.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Points out that, according to the 2010 Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS ~~will correspond to around~~could be up to 2.4 billion ~~banked~~ allowances ~~and unused international credits in 2020~~;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Points out that, according to the Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS ~~will~~due mainly to the economic crisis could correspond to around 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Elisabetta GARDINI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Points out that, according to the Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS due mainly to the economic crisis will correspond to around 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9

9. Recognises that the fuel switching towards cleaner fuels and private investment in green technologies depends ~~heavi~~not only on the price signal delivered by the carbon market, a~~nd concludes~~s demonstrated by the re~~fore that, under the current 20% target, the ETS will have a very limited role in driving emission reductions and deployment of low- emission technologies in the sectors it covers;~~cent experience in third countries which do not have a market mechanism to trade emission allowances.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Notes that, due to ~~the surplus and~~ low carbon price, the auction of allowances ~~will also~~might not mobilise resources for climate investments as expected;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Notes that, due to the scur~~plus and~~rent low carbon price, resulting from the recession , the auction of allowances ~~will~~might also not mobilise resources for climate investments as expected;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)

~~emission reduction targets, European business calls on EU institutions to work towards a stable investment environment for European companies. The pragmatic sectoral, bottom-up~~ 10a. Considering that at international level individual countries have not yet shown a preference for a target based approach but are making concrete efforts in investing in cleand technolog~~y-based approach to~~ies instead. Or. en (Rather than focusing the EU climate and energy ~~challenges pursued for example in~~policy discussion on new numerical comprehensive low-carbon strategy for Europe in 2020 and beyond which will provide a China is an approach from which the EU could learn.)

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Recalls that the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 confirms the EU's offer in the international negotiations to take on a 30% reduction target for 2020, if the conditions are right. Recalls that, according to the Commission analysis, stepping up to the 30% reduction target with 25% domestic effort now represents an increase of EUR 11 billion as compared to 2008 projections for the absolute costs of the climate and energy package in 2020; ~~notes the Commission assessment that this will raise the carbon price in the EU ETS to some EUR 30/tonne of CO2, i.e. similar to the level estimated necessary for the 20% reduction target in 2008;~~

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Elisabetta GARDINI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)

11a. Recognises that the economic crises has reduced the ability of the EU economy to invest in low carbon technologies;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)

12a. Notes that the Commission Communication of May 2010 is no longer valid because it does not take into account the last two years of events into the Member States and at global level.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Sergio BERLATO, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Martin CALLANAN, Richard SEEBER

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Notes the option of implementing the change in the ETS through cancelling allowances assigned for auctioning; ~~considers however that all sectors should contribute;~~after that the 2020 target has been already set in the broad political compromise of the revised ETS Directive undermines the credibility and predictability of the legal framework, which is crucial to ensure long term investments in low carbon technologies. Also notes that such option would require an amendment, through co-decision, of the Emission Trading Directive (Directive2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community amended by Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC) so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)

14 a. Considers for encouraging investments in new technologies by the private sector, it is essential to maintain the stability of the legal and economic framework where industries shall operate. A disruption in the current framework would generate uncertainties in the decision-making process and also negatively affect possible investments in this sector.

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Bogusław SONIK

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16

16. Deplores the lack of measures to capture the negative-cost greenhouse gas reduction potential in energy and resource efficiency where achievable; calls for strict application of the least lifecycle cost principle in implementing measures under the Eco- design Directive and for the Commission to review the methodology to consider alignment to a ‘top-runner’ approach;

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Richard SEEBER, Salvatore TATARELLA, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)

18a. Takes into account that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises the need to safeguard the competitiveness of European industry (i.e. implement a cost-effective path to maximise benefits for EU manufacturing and to maximise benefits for EU).

2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)

18b. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast action regulating strategies with a view to accelerate the phase-out of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), and recover and destroy stratospheric ozone depleting GHGs in discarded products and equipment.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Richard SEEBER, Salvatore TATARELLA, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)

18c. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast-action strategies with a view to reduce emissions of Black Carbon, giving priority to emissions that affect regions of snow and ice, including the Arctic

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Richard SEEBER, Salvatore TATARELLA, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)

18d. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast-action regulating strategies with a view to reduce pollutant gases that lead to formation of tropospheric (lower atmosphere) ozone, a significant GHG

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)

18a. Takes into account that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises the need to remain attentive to the risk of carbon leakage in order to ensure a level playing field.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)

18b. Takes into account that, as by Council Conclusions of 14 March 2011, Member States have reiterated the importance of ensuring the continuation of existing flexible mechanisms, while improving them, and establishing new sectoral or other scaled-up market-based mechanisms at the Durban Climate Conference in order to enhance the cost- effectiveness of, and to promote, mitigation actions while contributing to sustainable development.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)

19a. Considers that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises that the development of sectoral policy options will have to go into greater depth on costs, trade-offs and uncertainties. 1 __________________ 1 Roadmap 2050 pag. 6

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)

19b. Takes into account the need to carry out an in-depth analysis of the cumulative costs of climate objectives in terms of carbon prices, energy prices and expenditure for innovation and research.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)

19c. Following the public debt crisis as a consequence of the financial crisis that has hit Europe, Member States will have to reduce excess debt of 1/20 each year. This means that there will be less public funds for investments to promote innovation and growth.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Bogusław SONIK, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20

20. Considers that ~~a move to a 30% climate target for 2020 would restore~~setting long-term targets would give new emphasis to the incentives for innovation ~~lost by the easing~~ of the 20% target;

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21

21. Notes that European eco-industries employ approximately 3.4 million (FTE), which is ten times the figure for direct employment in the EU steel sector in 2007; points out that, according to recent studies, raising the EU climate target to 30% can foster up to 6 million additional jobs in Europe;deleted

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Richard SEEBER, Salvatore TATARELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)

21a. Notes that in the EU analysis of options to reduce greenhouse gas emission, the case is not how to create more ‘green jobs’ by subsidising non- efficient (after carbon pricing is taken into consideration) installations for renewables but how to create ‘defendable jobs’ which will stand the competition test posed by the emerging global players; Where the relevant equipment for some renewable sources is increasingly manufactured in China and India, Europe should now invest more in energy efficiency which will strengthen local economies by supporting local jobs that cannot leak to third countries with lower cost of production

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Sergio BERLATO, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Martin CALLANAN, Elisabetta GARDINI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)

21a. Concurs with the European Commission’s Roadmap for a low carbon economy by 2050 where it states that ‘the creation and preservation of jobs will depend on the EU's ability to lead in terms of the development of new low carbon technologies through increased education, training, programmes to foster acceptability of new technologies, R&D and entrepreneurship, as well as favourable economic framework conditions for investments’

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Martin CALLANAN, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Elisabetta GARDINI, Sergio BERLATO

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)

21b. Notes the lack of a thorough assessment of the impacts on employment caused by the low carbon transition which would primarily entail a shift of jobs across sectors, and that there is a need to better identify ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of such transition.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25

25. Emphasises that the co-benefits of emissions reductions o~~nly occur~~ccur most of all for emissions reductions achieved inside the EU and where there is a strong emphasis in the short and medium term on increased energy efficiency investment; and fuel switching towards cleaner fuels.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26

26. Concludes that stepping up to a 30% target has more benefits than costs for EU citizens ~~and a domestic achievement of the reduction targets would bring the highest overall benefit~~only in case of a global agreement; while setting long-term targets and additional policies like energy efficiency measures will allow achieving the long-term target coherent with the 2°C objective;

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN, Bogusław SONIK, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)

27a. Notes that the Commission has fully acknowledged that the best protection against the risk of carbon leakage would be effective global action. 1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 9

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)

27b. Notes that the Commission has fully acknowledged that there is a need to remain vigilant in order to maintain a strong industrial base in Europe.1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 9

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Richard SEEBER, Peter LIESE

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30

30. Concurs with the Commission analysis that border adjustment measures or including imports in the ETS would need to be combined with full auctioning to the sectors concerned; considers that such a system could be envisaged especially for some standardised commodities, such as steel or cement~~, and electricity;~~.

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)

31a. Stresses that over-ambitious EU targets without commensurate international collaboration may harm the competitivess of EU industry and lead to carbon leakage across EU borders;

2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1

(1) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital must be ensured. To that end a comprehensive Union type-approval system for motor vehicles is in place. The technical requirements for the type- approval of motor vehicles and their exhaust systems with regard to permissible sound levels should be harmonised to avoid the adoption of requirements that differ from one Member State to another and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while, at the same time, providing for a high level of environmental protection and public safety. The Commission should also undertake an impact assessment regarding the labelling conditions applicable to air and noise pollution levels. This impact assessment should take into consideration the different types of vehicles covered by this Regulation (including electric vehicles) as well as the effect that such labelling could have on the car industry. In fact, while such labelling could be considered a useful tool for raising awareness among consumers and protecting their rights as regards transparency prior to the purchase of a vehicle, it could seriously and adversely affect the car industry on cost grounds. The impact assessment should therefore evaluate the cost- effectiveness of this tool.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6

(6) This Regulation should therefore introduce a different method in relation to the compulsory one of Directive 70/157/EEC. That method should be based on the method published by the UNECE Working Party on Noise (GRB) in 2007 which incorporated a 2007 version of the standard ISO 362. The results of monitoring of both the old and the new test methods were submitted to the Commission. Furthermore, in order to overcome the shortcomings inherent in the previous test method, the Commission should, within 24 months of the entry into force of this Regulation, submit an impact assessment to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effective contribution of tyre rolling equipment in reducing the noise level of vehicles, focussing on the road surface impact, and the research needs in this specific field, in view of adopting a new European test method which also takes into account road surface behaviour.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8

(8) This Regulation should also further reduce noise limits. It should take account of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor , which introduced new stricter noise requirements for motor vehicle tyres and which underlined the need for a coherent and comprehensive approach to addressing the problem of road noise, including taking into account the contribution of "silent" road surfaces and noise reducing materials in mitigating the road traffic sound level. This horizontal approach will more efficiently reduce the overall road traffic noise compared to a sectoral and vertical approach. Studies highlighting the annoyance and health effects from road traffic noise, and the associated costs and benefits should also be heeded.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8a (new)

(8a) The Commission should publish "silent" road guidelines, addressed to road authorities in order to provide them with a useful tool to comply with requirements for more sustainable road infrastructure.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10

(10) The environmental benefits expected from hybrid electric and pure electric road transport vehicles have resulted in a substantial reduction of the noise emitted by such vehicles. This has resulted in the removal of an important source of audible signal that is used by blind and low vision pedestrians and cyclists, amongst other road users, to become aware of the approach, presence or departure of these vehicles. For that purpose, industry is developing acoustic systems to compensate for this lack of audible signal in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. The performance of approaching vehicle audible systems fitted to vehicles should be harmonised. The fitting of such systems should however, remain an option at the discretion of vehicle manufacturers. The adequate audibility of electric cars should be assured by a minimum noise level - not only with regard to public health and road safety but also with respect to particularly vulnerable groups such as pedestrians and people with disabilities.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

This Regulation shall apply to vehicles of categories M1, M2, M3, N1, N2 and N3, as defined in Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC and to the systems, components and separate technical units designed and constructed for such vehicles. Vehicles produced in small series in accordance with section 1 of Part A of Annex XII to Directive 2007/46/EC must comply with all parts of this Regulation, except Article 8 and Article 9.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2

(2) ‘vehicle type’ means ~~a set of vehicles as defined in Annex II Part B to Directive 2007/46/EC.~~ : (i) for vehicles, tested in accordance with Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.1, a set of vehicles as defined in Annex II Part B to Directive 2007/46/EC; (ii) for vehicles, tested in accordance with Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.2, a set of vehicles which do not essentially differ in such respects as: – the shape or materials of the bodywork (particularly the engine compartment and its soundproofing); – the type of engine (e.g. positive or compression ignition, two- or four-stroke, reciprocating or rotary piston), number and capacity of cylinders, type of injection system, arrangement of valves, rated engine speed (S), or the type of electric motor; – vehicles having the same type of engine and/or different overall gear ratios, may be regarded as vehicles of the same type. However, if the above differences provide for a different test method, these differences are to be considered as a change of type.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)

c) if the manufacturer is an independent small volume car manufacturer within the meaning of paragraph 1 to 3 of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles1, and tests with an approved testing facility the static noise value of vehicles to allow for in use testing. The manufacturer shall also submit a report to the Commission setting out measures it has taken or plans to take to reduce noise emissions, in line with its reduction potential and consistent with the characteristics of the market segments concerned. _______________ 1 OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 b (new)

Article 4b Monitoring Member States shall, in accordance with Regulation EC (No) 765/2008, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/931, guarantee effective monitoring of their market. They shall carry out appropriate checks on the characteristics of products on an adequate scale, in accordance with the principles set out in Article 19(1) of Regulation 765/2008. _______________ 1 OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph - 1 (new)

-1. The testing conditions laid down in Annex II should take into account typical on-road driving conditions and the testing requirements of other essential components of the vehicle, which have already been covered by applicable EU legislation, and in particular by Regulation (EC) No 661/2009.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6

The sound level measured in accordance with the provisions of Annex II ~~shall not exceed the limits set out in Annex III~~and mathematically rounded to the nearest integer value shall not exceed the limits set out in Annex III. For special purpose vehicles under paragraph 5 of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC, the applicable limit values shall be increased by +3 dB(A). For vehicles produced in small series in accordance with section 1 of Part A of Annex XII to Directive 2007/46/EC, the application dates for phase 1 and phase 2 shall be postponed by two more years. The applicable limit values are increased by +1 dB(A) for phase 1.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1

~~Within three years f~~Following the date referred to in Annex III, third column, phase 1, to this Regulation, the Commission shall c~~arry out a detailed study to ascer~~omplete a review of the noise limits in Annex III. The review shall include an impact assessment which includes an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its in particular its dependent industries, takin ~~whether the noise limits prove to be appropriate. On the basis of the conclusions of the study~~g into account the influence of other regulations - such as those in the field of CO2 emissions reductions and safety - on the sound level of motor vehicles. On the basis of such a review and its impact assessment, the Commission ~~may, where~~shall, if appropriate, ~~present proposals for amendment to this Regulat~~make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way that is as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition. The limit values referred to in Annex III, column 4 Phase 2, shall enter into force six years after confirmation of the impact assessment and completion of the review process of the Commission.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 1 a and 1 b (new)

1a. Vehicles shall automatically meet the requirements of Annex X if the vehicle manufacturer submits to the type- approval authority technical documents showing the difference between the maximum and minimum engine speed of the vehicles at BB'17 ≤ 0,15 x S, for any test condition inside the ASEP control range defined in point 3.3. of Annex VIII with respect to the conditions set out in Annex II. 1b. Vehicles of category N1 are exempted from ASEP if one of the following conditions is met: (a) Engine capacity ≤ 660 ccm and power- to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass ≤ 35; (b) Payload ≥ 850 kg and power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass ≤ 40.

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

2a. Vehicles of category N1 are exempted from ASEP if one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (a) The engine capacity is not exceeding 660 ccm and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 35; The payload is at least 850 kg and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 40;

2012/06/13
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 5.2.2. a (new)

5.2.2.a The limit values set forth in the table in Annex III apply with a reasonable tolerance margin during measurement.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Miroslav OUZKÝ, Salvatore TATARELLA, Martin CALLANAN

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II - point 3.2.2.

3.2.2. Tyre rolling sound emissions are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 on the general safety of motor vehicles. The tyres to be used for the test shall be representative for the vehicle and shall be selected by the vehicle manufacturer and recorded in Appendix 3 to Annex I of this Regulation. They shall correspond to one of the tyre sizes designated for the vehicle as original equipment. The tyre is or will be commercially available on the market at the same time as the vehicle. 2/ The tyres shall be inflated to the pressure recommended by the vehicle manufacturer for the test mass of the vehicle. The tyres shall have ~~at least~~ legal tread depth.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 3.2.2. – footnote 2/

2/ Given that the tyre contribution for overall sound emission is significant, regard must be had for existing regulatory provisions concerning tyre/road sound emissions. Traction tyres, snow tyres and special-use tyres shall be excluded during type-approval- and conformity of production measurements at the request of the manufacturer in accordance with UNECE Rregulation No. 117 ~~(OJ L 231, 29.8.2008, p. 19)~~.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Thomas ULMER, Martin CALLANAN, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III

Annex III Limit values The sound level measured in accordance with the provisions of Annex II shall not exceed the following limits: Vehicle Description of vehicle Limit values expressed in dB(A) [decibels (A)] c Category category Limit values for Limit values for Limit values for ~~for~~ Type- approval Type-approval registration, sale and ~~approval of~~ of new vehicles of new vehicle entry into service of ~~new vehicle~~new types types ~~new~~ vehicles ~~types~~ Phase 1 valid Phase 2 valid Phase 3 valid from from from [7 (8 years after [2 (1 years after [5(6 years after publication]) publication]) publication]) Off- Off- General General ~~Off-~~General Off-road ~~General road General G~~road road Vehicles used for the carriage M of passengeral Off-road * s M1 no of seats ≤ 9; ≤ 125 kW/ton 72 74*** 70 73*** 70 73*** road * no of seats ≤ 9; 125kW/ton < M1 power to mass ratio ≤ 73 75*** 71 *74*** 71 74*** ~~Vehicles used for the M carriage of passengers M1~~ 150kW/ton no of seats ≤ 9; M1 ~~no of seats < 9~~power to mass ratio > 75 70 7~~1** 68~~4 69** 74 68 69** 150kW/ton no of seats ~~< 9; M1~~≤ 4 including pdriver; Power to mass ratio > M1 71 71200kw/ton; R point of the 69 77 69 / 69 76 / 6976 / ~~150 kW/ton~~ driver seat < 450 mm from ground no of seats > 9; mass <≤ 2.5 M2 72 72 70 70 70 70 70 tons no of seats > 9; 2.5 tons < M2 73 74 75 742 713 ~~72 71~~ 72 73 mass <≤ 3.,5 tons no of seats > 9; 3.,5 tons < M2 < mass <≤ 5 tons; M2 rated engine 76 77 75 76 75 76 74 power < 150kW 75 72 73 ~~72 73~~ no of seats > 9; 3,5 tons < M2 mass ≤ 5 tons; rated engine ~~power <~~ 77 78 ~~150 kW no of seats > 9; 3.5 tons <~~76 77 76 77 power ≥ 150kW no of seats > 9; mass <> 5 tons; M2 M3 76 77 785 746 76 745 76 rated engine power ~~> 150 kW~~ ≤ 180kW no of seats > 9; mass > 5 tons; M3 180 kW < rated engine power 759 80 768 739 74 738 7~~4 rated engine power <~~9 1≤ 250 kW no of seats > 9; mass > 5 tons; M3 7780 81 79 7580 77 759 77 80 rated engine power > 1250 kW Vehicles used for the carriage N ~~carriage~~ of goods N1 mass <≤ 2.5 tons 71 72 714 6970 6972 69 70 ~~69 N1~~ 72 N1 2.5 tons < mass <≤ 3.,5 tons 72 74 735 702 713 ~~70 71~~ 72 73 3.,5 tons < mass <≤ 12 tons; N2 74 77 78 756 727 73 726 73 7 rated engine power < 75 150kW 3.3,5 tons < mass <≤ 12 tons; N2 75 78 79 767 738 74 737 74 8 ~~75 <~~ rated engine power < ≥150 kW ~~3.5 tons <~~ mass <> 12 tons; N2 N3 779 80 7978 759 77 758 77 9 rated engine power ~~> 150 kW~~ ≤180kW mass > 12 tons; N3 75180 < rated engine power 77 81 782 7580 7681 75 7680 81 ~~< 1~~≤250 kW N3 mass > 12 tons; N3 80 82 78 80 78 802 83 81 ~~rated engine power >~~ 82 81 82 ~~150 kW * Increased limit values shall only be valid~~ rated engine power >250 kW *** For M1 vehicles if the vehicle complies with the relevant definition for off-road vehicles ~~set out in point 4 of Section A~~ according to article A.4 of Annex II tof EU Directive 20076/46/EC~~. ** For M1 vehicles the increased limit values for off-road vehicles are only valid if the maximum authorised mass > 2 tonnes.~~ and in addition have a wading depth exceeding 500 mm and a hill climbing capability of 35°. Remark Limits for N3 only if "Normal Tyres" are allowed to be used for the test

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VII – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

In addition to the requirements set out under points 1 to 3.2.21.4, the following re~~quirements shall be fulfilled~~commendations are given:

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VII – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

In addition to the requirements set out under points 1 to 3.2.2, the following requirements ~~shall be fulfilled~~of ISO 10844:2011 shall be fulfilled or a reference should be made to ISO 10844:1994 for a transitional period of 5 years:

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VII – point 2 – footnote 1

1/For the first five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, manufacturers may either use test tracks certified according to ISO 10844:1994 or ISO 10844:2011. After that date manufacturers shall use test tracks complying with ISO 10844:2011 only.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – point 2.3. – line 4 'Vehicle acceleration'

Vehicle acceleration awot ASEP: awot ≤ 54,0 m/s2

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Martin CALLANAN

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – paragraph 2.4. –paragraph 3 (new)

In order for the ASEP test to be representative and repeatable (to the Type Approval Authority), the vehicles shall be tested using production gearbox calibration.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0409(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Miroslav OUZKÝ, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 5.2.1.1.

5.2.1.1 The noise test of the silencing system and the replacement silencing system has to be executed with the ~~same~~ "normal" tyres as defined in paragraph 2.8~~. of~~ UNECE Regulation No. 117 ~~(OJ L231, 29.8.2008 p. 19)~~. The tests are not allowed to be done with "traction tyres", "special use" tyres or "snow" tyres as defined in paragraphs 2.9.10, 2.11 and 2.10.2 of UNECE Regulation No 117. Such tyres could increase the noise level of the vehicle or would have a masking effect on the noise reduction performance comparison. The tyres may be of used condition but shall satisfy legal requirements for in-traffic use.

2012/06/12
Committee: ENVI

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)

(d a) strengthening the knowledge transfer from research and innovation to all levels of education;

2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new)

6 a. The instruments for the connexion between Research, Innovation the Structural Funds should be implemented through programs, "Regions of Knowledge" and "Smart specialisations, both instruments should be located inside ERA, in order to create objective indicators for the stairs of excellence

2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Lambert van NISTELROOIJ, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 – paragraph 1

A key added value of research and innovation funded at the Union level is the possibility to disseminate and communicate results on a continent wide scale to enhance their impact. Horizon 2020 will therefore include, under all of its specific objectives, dedicated support to dissemination (including through open access to research results), communication and dialogue actions, with a strong emphasis on communicating results to end- users, citizens, civil society organisations, industry and policy makers. To this extent, Horizon 2020 may make use of networks for information transfer. Communication activities undertaken in the context of Horizon 2020 will also seek to raise public awareness on the importance of research and innovation by means of publications, events, knowledge repositories, databases, websites or a targeted use of social media. In order to simplify the access to information and to develop an instrument with all the information demanded by the research community and, having regard the need for a transparency, Cordis, as a digital instrument should be revised and reformed in a more clear and flexible way.

2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)

i) Knowledge science and technology. Life sciences, Health, earth, environment, natural resources and food security.

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Lambert van NISTELROOIJ, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)

ii) Social, Economic and Humanities. Demographic challenges, education, territorial issues, governance, culture, digital contents, humanities, cultural heritage and intangible knowledge areas.

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Lambert van NISTELROOIJ, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 5 – point 5.1 – point 5.1.3 a (new)

5.1.3 a. It is essential to study the regional impacts of climate change on the ecosystem, water resources, agriculture and forestry, in order to analyse its impact on human life, health and other socio- economic issues, but also to investigate direct and indirect influence of global change on the dynamics and capacity of ecosystem.

2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)

(da) strengthening the knowledge transfer from research and innovation to all levels of education

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

Part III ‘'Societal challenges’' shall contribute to the priority ‘'Societal challenges’' set out in Article 5(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020] by pursuing research, technological development, demonstration and innovation actions and the related socio- economic issues, which contribute to the following specific objectives:

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

The instruments for the connexion between Research, Innovation and the Structural Funds shall be implemented through the programmes "Regions of Knowledge" and "Smart specialisations", both instruments should be located inside ERA, in order to create objective indicators for the stairway of excellence

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 – paragraph 1

A key added value of research and innovation funded at the Union level is the possibility to disseminate and communicate results on a continent wide scale to enhance their impact. Horizon 2020 will therefore include, under all of its specific objectives, dedicated support to dissemination (including through open access to research results), communication and dialogue actions, with a strong emphasis on communicating results to end- users, citizens, civil society organisations, industry and policy makers. To this extent, Horizon 2020 may make use of networks for information transfer. Communication activities undertaken in the context of Horizon 2020 will also seek to raise public awareness on the importance of research and innovation by means of publications, events, knowledge repositories, databases, websites or a targeted use of social media. In order to simplify the access to information and to develop an instrument with all the information demanded by the research community and, having regard the need for a transparency, Cordis, as a digital instrument should be revised and reformed in a more clear and flexible way.

2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.1 – point 3.1.3 – paragraph 1

Urban areas are one of the largest consumers of energy in the Union and emit a correspondingly large share of greenhouse gases, while generating a substantial amount of air pollutants. In that context, there is a need of promoting integrated systemic urban development strategies that take into account: energy efficiency, accessibility, green spaces, adaptation of habitats and social integration. At the same time, urban areas are affected by decreasing air quality and climate change and have to develop their own mitigation and adaptation strategies. Finding innovative energy solutions (energy efficiency, electricity and heating and cooling supply systems), integrated with transport, waste and water treatment as well as ICT solutions for the urban environment are therefore crucial in the transformation towards a low carbon society. Targeted initiatives in support to the convergence of industrial value chains of the energy, transport and ICT sector for smart urban applications need to be envisaged. At the same time, new technological, organisational, planning and business models need to be developed and tested at full scale according to the needs and means of cities and communities. Research is also needed to understand the social, economic and cultural issues that are involved in this transformation.

2012/07/05
Committee: ITRE

2011/0402(CNS)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Salvatore TATARELLA, Pilar del CASTILLO VERA

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.1 – point 6.1.1 – paragraph 1 a (new)

The major societal challenges are not abstract, they have a territorial dimension. Moreover according to the importance of the urban problematic in terms of creativity, innovation, social, economic, cultural and environmental issues, there is a need for a specific consideration.

2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE

2011/0401(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)

(30a) The participation of research teams in different projects should be contemplated as the reinforcement of quality and the possibility of an international co-operation.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

(ea) 'Research infrastructures' (RI) "are facilities, resources, organisational systems and services that are used by the research communities to conduct research and innovation in their fields. Where relevant, they may be used beyond research, e.g. for education or public services. This includes: major scientific equipment (or sets of instruments); knowledge-based resources such as collections, archives or scientific data; e- infrastructures, such as data, computing and software systems, communication networks and systems to promote openness and digital trust; any other infrastructure of a unique nature essential to achieve excellence in research and innovation."

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

(ea) 'Trans - European technology transfer' means the transfer of scientific outcomes and technology between public and private bodies located in different EU Member States.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)

(eb) 'Smart Specialization' means the concept for the development of the R&D and innovation policy of the European Union. The objective of smart specialization is to promote efficient and effective use of public investment using synergies among countries and regions and strengthening their innovation capacity. The smart specialization strategy is made of a multi-annual strategy program which goal is to develop a functional national or regional research innovation system.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Horizon 2020 shall play a central role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by providing a common strategic framework for the Union's research and innovation funding, thus acting as a vehicle for leveraging private investment, transferring research results to all the levels of education, creating new job opportunities and ensuring Europe's long- term sustainable growth and competitiveness.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Horizon 2020 shall play a central role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by providing a common strategic framework for the Union's research and innovation funding, thus acting as a vehicle for leveraging private investment, creating new job opportunities and ensuring Europe's long-term sustainable growth and competitiveness. Trans - European technology transfer should be the main tool in achieving these goals.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1

1. Horizon 2020 shall contribute to building an economy based on knowledge and innovation across the whole Union by leveraging sufficient additional research, development and innovation funding. Thereby, it shall support the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy and other Union policies, as well as the achievement and functioning of the European Research Area (ERA)~~. The relevant performance indicators~~ and the instruments for the connexion between Research and Innovation and the Structural Funds should be implemented through programs, "Regions of Knowledge" and "Smaret s~~et out in the introduction of Annex I~~pecialisations, both instruments should be located inside ERA, in order to create objective indicators for the stairs of excellence.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point i (new)

i) Knowledge science and technology. Life sciences, Health, earth, environment, natural resources and food security.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point ii (new)

ii) Social, Economic and Humanities. Demographic challenges, education, territorial issues, governance, culture, digital contents, humanities, cultural heritage and intangible knowledge areas.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1

1. Linkages and interfaces shall be implemented across and within the priorities of Horizon 2020. Particular attention shall be paid in this respect to the development and application of key enabling and industrial technologies, to bridging from discovery to market application, to cross-disciplinary research and innovation, to social and economic sciences and humanities , to a systemic approach of the spatial, urban and territorial issues, to fostering the functioning and achievement of the ERA, to cooperation with third countries, to responsible research and innovation including gender, and to enhancing the attractiveness of the research profession and to facilitating cross-border and cross- sector mobility of researchers.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1

Horizon 2020 shall be implemented in a manner ensuring that the priorities and actions supported are relevant to changing needs and take account of the evolving nature of science, technology, innovation, markets and society, where innovation includes business, organisational and social aspects and transfer of science results to all the levels of education and training.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point a

(a) the added value of action at Union level, particularly the Trans - European nature;

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Salvatore TATARELLA, Françoise GROSSETÊTE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

(ea) Helping the creation and strengthening of association networks of researchers, patients and stakeholders in order to improve the relations and exchanges among them, concerned sectors, institutions and civil society.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 7 a (new)

New instrument: implementation of a clear program for the transfer of science, research and innovation to the education content at all levels, as well as for the adaptation of the technologies to the use.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III Priority 'Societal Challenges' – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)

(f b) Smart cities and cultural heritage

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part I – point 4.3 a (new)

4.3 a. Constitution of a data base concerning the results of the research and innovation The aim shall be to create and to make available a data base of the results of research and innovation. This will be open to international collaboration. Both research groups and enterprises will add contents to this data base in order to help the launch of a market of innovation and cooperation and to stimulate the meeting of possible partners.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0401(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1.1 – paragraph 1 a (new)

It should be needed to strengthen research on diseases that are derived from the increase of temperature and climate change which affect Mediterranean countries in particular but not only them.

2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1

1. All airport users shall be ~~free to self- handle~~allowed to self-handle. 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, and for the following categories of service: baggage handling, ramp handling, fuel and oil handling, handling and processing of incoming, outgoing and transit freight and mail between airport buildings and aircraft, Member States may limit the number of self-handling users at any one airport. However, at airports whose annual traffic is not less than one million passengers, Member States may reserve the right of self-handling, for not less than two users, provided that these are chosen on the basis of relevant, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0397(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2

2. Where, following the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10, a supplier of groundhandling services mentioned in paragraph 1 loses its authorisation to provide these services, Member States mayust require supplier(s) of groundhandling services which subsequently provide these services to grant staff previously hired to provide these services the rights to which they would have been entitled if there had been a transfer within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/23/EC.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0397(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5

5. WThe~~re a Member State imposes a requirement as referred to in paragraph (2),~~ tender documents for the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10 shall list the staff concerned and give the relevant details of employees' contractual rights and the conditions under which employees are deemed to be linked to the services in question.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0397(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Antonio CANCIAN, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1

1. ~~The managing body of the airport shall be in charge of the proper coordination of groundhandling activities at its airport.~~ As ground coordinator, the managing body of the airport shall ~~in particular~~ ensure that the operations of suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users comply with the airport rules of conduct as defined in Article 31. The managing body of the airport shall be authorised to enforce compliance with airport regulations. The measures adopted shall be transparent, proportional and non-discriminatory.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0397(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Antonio CANCIAN, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) ~~the managing body of the airport shall ensure that~~ the operations of suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users arshall be coordinated, where possible, through an airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) and through a proper contingency plan.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0397(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Antonio CANCIAN, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3

3. Suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall respect these minimum quality standards. In addition, airport users and suppliers of groundhandling services shall respect the minimum quality standards in their contractual relations. The public authority concerned shall either directly or upon notification by the managing body of the airport impose appropriate penalties where the minimum quality standards laid down in the Airport Regulations and referred to in Paragraph (2) are not complied with. To ensure suppliers of groundhandling services comply with minimum requirements, the managing body of the airport shall have access to information on the parameters for groundhandling services laid down in the Service Level Agreements (SLAs). If the managing body finds that the SLAs do not comply with the airport’s minimum quality standards, it may ask the supervisory authority to take the appropriate action. These standards must be objective, proportional and non- discriminatory.

2012/10/10
Committee: TRAN

2011/0387(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Maria da Graça CARVALHO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

· Enhancing the impact of investments on education, research and innovation and testing new ways for innovation governance: The EIT acts as a catalyst, adding value to the existing research base, by accelerating the take-up and exploitation of technologies and research outcomes and by transferring research results to all the levels of education. Innovation activities contribute in turn to align and leverage research investments and to make education and training activities more responsive to business needs. To this end, the EIT has been equipped with a substantial degree of flexibility to test out new innovation models, allowing for true differentiation in the KICs' governance and funding models and quick adaptation to better cope with emerging opportunities.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Maria da Graça CARVALHO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 5 – point 6

· Urban mobility, smart and sustainable development.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Maria da Graça CARVALHO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Factsheet 6 – title

Urban Mobility, smart and sustainable development.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Maria da Graça CARVALHO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 1 – paragraph 1

The theme of smart, green and integrated transport has been identified as one of the major societal challenges which will be addressed within the framework of Horizon 2020. The 2011 Transport White Paper further reinforces the importance of taking action in this domain during the next decade. Urban mobility is a particularly challenging task. It should be addressed through a truly integrated and holistic approach, taking explicitly into account the interaction with the other topics in a spatial context. It addresses a number of topics such as transport (including new mobility concepts, transport organisation, logistics, transport systems safety and security), environmental issues (reduction of greenhouse gases, air pollution and noise) urban planning, urban and natural landscape (new concepts for bringing work and living closer together), cultural heritage and has an important impact both at the economic and social levels (new business creation, employment, social inclusion, housing and location strategies). The overarching aim is to improve the quality of life of European citizens who – in increasing numbers – live in large urban conglomerations where much of Europe's economic performance is generated.13

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Maria da Graça CARVALHO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 1

The key objective of a KIC on urban mobility and smart and sustainable development will be to ensure a greener, more inclusive, safer and smarter urban mobility system.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 2

As already outlined above, the theme is highly relevant from a societal and public policy point of view. It also is highly relevant from a socio-economic perspective since it involves important economic sectors in GDP and employment terms, such as the automotive or the construction sectors. Urban mobility is, in addition, linked with environmental protection strategies and fully embedded in policies of social inclusion, location, housing ~~and~~, urban design and revitalization of historical centres.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0387(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Spyros DANELLIS, Giommaria UGGIAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 3

A KIC on urban mobility and smart and sustainable development is both in line with the priorities defined in Horizon 2020 and with Europe 2020 strategy objectives of achieving a smarter, more sustainable, low carbon and inclusive urban development. A KIC in this thematic area could contribute to each of Europe 2020 strategy objectives by, for example, the promotion of eco-efficient solutions, intelligent ICT schemes for traffic management, and provision of more efficient and affordable transport services.

2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE

2011/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5

(5) Cross-border cooperation should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions (such as poor accessibility, inappropriate business environment, lack of networks among local and regional administrations, research and innovation and take-up of information and communication technologies, environmental pollution, risk prevention, negative attitudes towards neighbouring country citizens) and exploit the untapped potentials in the border area (development of cross-border research and innovation facilities and clusters, cross-border labour market integration, cooperation among universities or health centres, and development of specific projects in the tourism sector), while enhancing the cooperation process for the purpose of the overall harmonious development of the Union. In the case of any cross-border programme between Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF shall also contribute to promoting social and economic stability in the regions concerned, notably by actions to promote cohesion between communities.

2012/05/03
Committee: TRAN

2011/0273(COD)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Carlo FIDANZA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 3 – point d a (new)

(da) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practice on tourism and transport networks.

2012/05/03
Committee: TRAN

2011/0273(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Spyros DANELLIS, Giommaria UGGIAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point a – point iv a (new)

iv a) carrying out and promoting actions in the tourism sector intended to develop the areas concerned;

2012/05/03
Committee: TRAN

2011/0273(COD)

Carlo FIDANZA, Hubert PIRKER, Spyros DANELLIS, Giommaria UGGIAS, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point b

b) under transnational cooperation: development and implementation of macro-regional and sea-basin strategies (within the thematic objective of enhancing institutional capacity ~~and~~, an efficient public administration and targeted actions in the tourism sector).

2012/05/03
Committee: TRAN

2011/0229(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5

(5) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 and more in particular bovine identification and voluntary beef labelling were listed as "information obligations with special importance in terms of the burdens they impose on businesses" in the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on an "Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU" .deleted

2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI

2011/0229(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20

(20) Section II of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 lays down rules for a voluntary beef labelling system which provide for the approval of certain labelling specifications by the competent authority of the Member State. The administrative burden and the costs incurred by Member States and economic operators in applying this system are not proportionate to the benefits of the system. That Section should therefore be deleted.

2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI

2011/0229(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Paolo BARTOLOZZI

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1

1. 1. Each Member State shall set up an energy efficiency obligation scheme. This scheme shall ensure that either all energy distributors or all retail energy sales companies operating on the Member State's territory achieve annual energy savings ~~equal to 1.5%~~as a quota of their energy sales, by volume, in the previous year in that Member State ~~excluding energy used in transport. This amount of energy savings shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customers~~, as contribution to the national target as set pursuant to Article 3 of this Directive, taking into account the Union’s target of 20% energy savings by 2020. This amount of energy savings shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customers. The energy saving target shall be introduced gradually and with a starting level differentiated on a national basis in order to take into full account early actions and results achieved so far, including efficiency measures already adopted in the fuel sector. Measures that target long-term savings or structured programs proposed by operators in the energy efficiency sector should be encouraged through incentives or specific fiscal treatment.

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2

2. Member States shall ensure that enterprises not included in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 are subject and encouraged to an energy audit carried out in ~~an independent and~~ cost- effective manner by qualified or accredited experts at the latest by 30 June 2014 and every three years from the date of the previous energy audit.

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1

1. By 1 January 2014, Member States shall establish and notify to the Commission a national heating and cooling plan for developing the potential for the application of high-efficiency cogeneration and efficient district heating and cooling~~, containing the information set out in Annex VII.~~. Each national plan shall identify: (a) national cogeneration development targets for year 2020 and corresponding intermediate targets; (b) district heating promotion areas for which cost-benefit analysis have identified cogeneration potential; (c) the information set out in Annex VII. (d) The plans should be based on a comprehensive costs/benefits analysis for each of the planned investments, taking into account the existing level of heat demand and evaluating the different consumption profiles (e. g. industrial, residential or tertiary consumption patterns). Moreover, different types of cogeneration (micro, for self- consumption…) should be considered on the basis of the specificities of different national demand and consumption patterns. (e) The plans shall be updated and notified to the Commission every five years. Member States shall ensure by means of their regulatory framework that national heating and cooling plans are taken into account in local and regional development plans, including urban and rural spatial plans, and fulfil the design criteria in Annex VII.

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

3. Member States shall ensure that in the promotion areas with cogeneration potential as identified according to paragraph 2, all new thermal electricity generation installations with a total thermal input exceeding 20 MW:

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1

6. Member States shall ensure that, in the promotion areas with cogeneration potential as identified according to paragraph 2, whenever an existing electricity generation installation with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW is substantially refurbished or when, in accordance with Article 21 of Directive 2010/75/EC, its permit is updated, the technical and economic feasibility of a conversion to allow its operation as a high- efficiency cogeneration installation is set as a preferential condition in the new or updated permit or licence, provided that the installation is sited in a location where the ~~waste hea~~re is sufficient can ~~be used by heat demand points in accordance with point 1 of Annex VIII~~d long-term stable heat demand. The equipment of electricity generation installations with carbon capture or storage facilities shall not be considered as refurbishment for the purpose of these provisions.

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. Member States should not set targets for the industries which are exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage, as determined in Commission Decision 2010/2/EU. Should they nonetheless decide to do so, Member States shall express possible sectoral targets for production processes in these industries in energy use per output unit so as to avoid impeding industrial growth.

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 5

5. The Commission’s assessment of the first supplementary report shall include an assessment of the energy efficiency levels of existing and new installations undertaking the combustion of fuels with a total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more and installations undertaking the refining of mineral oil and gas, in the light of the relevant best available techniques as developed in accordance with Directive 2010/75/EU and Directive 2008/1/EC. Where this assessment identifies significant discrepancies between the actual energy efficiency levels of such installations and energy efficiency levels associated with the application of the relevant best available techniques, the Commission shall propose, if appropriate, requirements to improve the energy efficiency levels achieved by such installations or that the use of such techniques shall in future be a condition for the permitting of new installations and for the periodic review of the permits for existing installations.deleted

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0172(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

~~The Commission shall also monitor the impact of implementing this Directive on Directive 2003/87/EC, Directive 2009/28/EC as well as Directive 2010/31/EC.~~deleted

2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Andrea ZANONI, Oreste ROSSI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Title

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children ~~and~~, on food for special medical purposes and on foodstuffs for people intolerant to gluten

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Andrea ZANONI, Oreste ROSSI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15

(15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food ~~and~~, food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten. Experience has shown that the provisions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, ~~as well as~~ Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation 41/2009 ensure the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner, while ensuring a high level of protection of public health. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation focuses on the general compositional and information requirements for infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal- based food and baby food for infants and young children ~~and to~~, food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC ~~and~~ Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16

(16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC ~~and~~, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation 41/2009 should be transferred to this Regulation. However, the definitions of infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food, ~~and~~ food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten should be regularly adapted taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19

(19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, ~~and~~ food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC ~~and~~, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009. In order to adapt the definitions of infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, ~~and~~ food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten laid down in this Regulation taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, to lay down the specific compositional and information requirements with respect to the categories of food covered by this Regulation, including for additional labelling requirements to, or derogations from, the provisions of Directive 2000/13/EC and for the authorisation of nutrition and health claims, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20

(20) It is appropriate to establish and update a Union list of ~~vitamins, minerals, amino acids and other substances that may be added~~substances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes to infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby foods, ~~and~~ food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Regulation (EC) No. 953/2009, Commission Directives 2006/141/EC and 2006/125/EC, subject to certain criteria laid down in this Regulation. Given the fact that the adoption of the list implies the application of criteria set out in this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in that respect. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts updating the Union list, where, in duly justified cases relating to public health, imperative grounds of urgency so require.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26

(26) Currently, the statements ‘'gluten-free’' and ‘'very low gluten’' may be used for food ~~intended for particular nutritional uses and for food for normal consumptio~~s for specialised nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specified in article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten. ~~Such statements could be construed as nutrition claims, as de~~In addition, the statement 'gluten-free' may be used for foodstuffs for normal consumption and other foods for specialised nutrition suitable for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specifined in Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. For the sake of simplification, those statements should be regulated solely by Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and comply with requirements therein. It is necessary that technical adaptations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, incorporating the nutrition claims ‘gluten-free’ and ‘very low gluten’ and their associated conditions of use as regulated under Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 be completed prior to the entry into application ofarticle 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten which do not allow the use of the statement 'very low gluten' for these foods. Such foods for specialized nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten shall be maintained in this Regulation, as providing such safe foods intended for people intolerant to gluten and informing coeliacs about the absence of gluten is vital to the management of the disease. This is in line with the international standard for foods for special dietary use for persons intolerant to gluten (CODEX STAN 118-1979 revised in 2008). Also the conditions of use of the claim "gluten- free" for foods for normal consumption should be maintained in thise Regulation (CE) 41/2009.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

1. This Regulation establishes compositional and information requirements for the following categories of food for specialised nutrition:

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

(ca) food for people intolerant to gluten.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3

3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to adapt the definitions of ‘'infant formula’', ‘'follow-on formula’', ‘'processed cereal-based food’' and ‘'baby food~~’ and ‘~~', 'food for special medical purposes’', and 'food for people intolerant to gluten' taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC ~~and~~, Directive 1999/21/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009, as well as any technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated Regulations, for foods covered by Article 1(1) no later than [2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], in accordance with Article 15, with respect to the following:

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2011/0156(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Sergio BERLATO, Lorenzo FONTANA, Cristiana MUSCARDINI, Oreste ROSSI, Andrea ZANONI, Patrizia TOIA, Antonio CANCIAN, Amalia SARTORI, Mario PIRILLO, Tiziano MOTTI, Salvatore TATARELLA, Lara COMI

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2

~~2. Directive 96/8/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 are repealed from [the first day of the month 2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation].~~deleted

2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI

2010/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29

29. Recommends th~~at the fitting of alcolocks to~~e development of a standard interface on all commercial passenger and goods transport vehicles ~~should be made compulsory~~to enable the easy installation of alcohol interlock devices for drivers convicted of drink drive offence;

2011/03/17
Committee: TRAN

2010/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36

36. Calls on the Commission to draw up a proposal to fit vehicles with ‘intelligent speed assistance systems’ which incorporates a timetable, details of an approval procedure and a description of the requisite road infrastructure;deleted

2011/03/17
Committee: TRAN

2010/2235(INI)

Salvatore TATARELLA, Raffaele BALDASSARRE, Barbara MATERA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37

37. Welcomes the Commission'’s ~~announcement that it intends to speed up~~commitment to the introduction of ‘eCall’, and calls on the Commission, over the next two years, to ~~consider whether it should be extended to cover motorcycles, heavy goods vehicles and buses and, if appropriate, make corresponding proposal~~remove the last obstacles to the deployment of the system such as the necessary upgrade of the infrastructure and by adopting the necessary standards;

2011/03/17
Committee: TRAN

2010/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)

7a. Considers that the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) has a major role to play in the assessment and notification of all risks associated with the food chain as part of a set of measures designed to protect the health and wellbeing of the public; hopes that all Member States will set up corresponding national bodies to collaborate with the European Food Safety Authority;

2010/11/09
Committee: ENVI

2010/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Encourages all the Member States to engage actively in the definition, development and implementation of common protocols ~~for early diagnosis and~~with a view to defining new criteria for early diagnosis, to establish biomarkers for the progress of the disease with a view to building on the emergence of new therapies for both dementia and pre-dementia, and to define a common research agenda in the field of neurodegenerative diseases, thus reducing the prevailing inequalities between Member States and within Member States as regards diagnosis and treatment; emphasises that standard operational procedures for the assessment of disease markers will be key to drug discovery and to the development of more effective, technology-assisted care of patients with Alzheimer’s disease;

2010/11/11
Committee: ENVI

2010/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Points to the importance of a multidisciplinary approach on ways in which cooperation and coordination in the field of research at European level can improve knowledge, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and social research into the welfare of patients and their families and carers; believes that ~~early diagnostic tests, research into risk factors and criteria for early diagnosis are~~research on the validation of new diagnostic criteria, the development of early screening tests, and the identification of risk factors for the progress of the disease from the pre- dementia phase to the advanced stages is crucial; this being the case, sees clear added value in conducting large-scale epidemiological and clinical studies in transnational collaboration;

2010/11/11
Committee: ENVI

2010/0301(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 3

(3) Directive 2000/25/EC provides for a flexibility scheme to allow tractor manufacturers to purchase, ~~in the period between two emissio~~during a given stages, a limited quantity of engines that do not comply with the current emission limit values, but are approved to the nearest previous stage of emission limits.

2011/02/22
Committee: ENVI

2010/0301(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 5

(5) During ~~the transition from Stage III A to~~ Stage III B, the percentage of the number of ~~engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme should be increased from 20% to 50% of the tractor manufacturer's annual sales of tractors~~tractors that enter into service under the flexibility scheme shall be 50% of the annual quantity of tractors entered into service by the tractor manufacturer with engines in that category. The optional alternative that a ~~maximum~~fixed number of engines may be placed on the market under the flexibility scheme should be adapted accordingly.

2011/02/22
Committee: ENVI

2010/0301(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 7

(7) The measures provided in this Directive reflect a temporary difficulty faced by the industry; as such, these measures shall be restricted to ~~the transition from Stage III A to Stage III B and expire on 31 December 2013~~Stage III B,

2011/02/22
Committee: ENVI

2010/0301(COD)

Alessandro FOGLIETTA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 7 a (new)

(7a) It is understood that the current emission limits shall be tightened with respect to ultrafine black carbon particles by implementing the particle number criterion in future legislation addressing the next emission targets.

2011/02/22
Committee: ENVI

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8

Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 7

7. ~~Subject to Article 10b, the amount of allowances allocated free of charge under paragraphs 3 to 6 of this Article [and paragraph 2 of Article 3c] in 2013~~Until an international agreement has entered into force, the amount of allowances allocated free of charge to installations not covered by paragraph 2 in 2013 and each subsequent year shall be 8100% of the quantity determined in accordance with the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and ~~thereafter the free allocation shall decrease each year by equal amounts resulting in no free allocation in 2020~~without changing the total quantity of allowances according to Article 9.

2008/07/15
Committee: ENVI

2008/0013(COD)

Alessandro FOGLIETTA, Salvatore TATARELLA

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 8

Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 8

8. In 2013 and in each subsequent year up to 2020, installations in sectors which are exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage shall be allocated allowances free of charge up to 100 percent of the quantity determined in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 6.deleted

2008/07/15
Committee: ENVI

2007/0286(COD)

Elisabetta GARDINI, Sergio BERLATO, Salvatore TATARELLA, Licia RONZULLI, Paolo BARTOLOZZI, Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS, Marianne THYSSEN, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, José Manuel FERNANDES, Bogusław SONIK, Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES

Council position
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1a (new)

For BAT reference documents adopted before the entry into force of the Directive, emission limit values shall also take into account the technical characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local environmental conditions.

2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI

2007/0286(COD)