BETA

Activities of Patrick GAUBERT

Plenary speeches (53)

Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0064(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2105(INI)
Sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0094(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0156(CNS)
Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment - Single application procedure for residence and work
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0229(COD)
Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment - Single application procedure for residence and work
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0229(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0113(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2285(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0041(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0088(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0167(COD)
Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0167(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0097(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0232(CNS)
Illegal immigration, external action of the European Union and Frontex (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0135(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0032(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2112(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0310(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0048(NLE)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0031(COD)
EUROMED (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0163(COD)
Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2094(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2094(INI)
Immigration - Legal migration - Policy priorities in the fight against illegal immigration of third-country nationals (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2251(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0277(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2079(INI)
Framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2067(INI)
Management of Europe's maritime borders - European Solidarity and protection of migrants' rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0256(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2108(INI)
Human rights in the world – Moratorium on the death penalty (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2020(INI)
Future of Professional Football in Europe - Security at Football Matches (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2130(INI)
Situation in Darfur (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2514(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2068(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0282(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/2148(INL)
EC-Syria Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2150(INI)
Freedom, security and justice – Immigration (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2627(RSP)
Situation in Darfur (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2625(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/2189(INI)
Situation in the Middle East (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2617(RSP)
Mutual information procedure Integration of immigrants in the European Union European Union immigration policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0204(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2004/2264(INI)
Increase in racist and homophobic violence in Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/2587(RSP)
Non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/2191(INI)
European Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0203(COD)
European Year of Equal Opportunities for All
2016/11/22
Human rights in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam
2016/11/22
Economic migration
2016/11/22
Legal and illegal migration and the integration of migrants
2016/11/22
Anti-Semitism and racism
2016/11/22

Reports (3)

REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State PDF (264 KB) DOC (397 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2007/0229(COD)
Documents: PDF(264 KB) DOC(397 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of a mutual information procedure concerning Member States' measures in the areas of asylum and immigration PDF (217 KB) DOC (178 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2005/0204(CNS)
Documents: PDF(217 KB) DOC(178 KB)
REPORT on the links between legal and illegal migration and integration of migrants PDF (245 KB) DOC (113 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2004/2137(INI)
Documents: PDF(245 KB) DOC(113 KB)

Opinions (1)

OPINION Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008)
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Documents: PDF(175 KB) DOC(123 KB)

Written declarations (6)

Written declaration on Colombia and the GSP plus trade preference

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(76 KB) DOC(38 KB)
Authors: Richard HOWITT, Caroline LUCAS, Patrick GAUBERT, Helmuth MARKOV, Renate WEBER
Written declaration on respect for human rights in the People’s Republic of China

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(72 KB) DOC(35 KB)
Authors: Patrick GAUBERT
Written declaration on the sixth anniversary of the kidnapping of Ingrid Bétancourt by the FARC

Written declaration on combating the trafficking and exploitation of children in football

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(76 KB) DOC(37 KB)
Authors: Ivo BELET, Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS, Adeline HAZAN, Guy BONO, Patrick GAUBERT
Written declaration on recognition of the slave trade and slavery as a crime against humanity

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(75 KB) DOC(35 KB)
Authors: Roselyne BACHELOT-NARQUIN, Pierre SCHAPIRA, Patrick GAUBERT
Written declaration on the third anniversary of the kidnapping of Ingrid Betancourt and Clara Rojas

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(76 KB) DOC(34 KB)
Authors: Patrick GAUBERT, Timothy KIRKHOPE, Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR

Amendments (120)

Amendment 18 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for new and broader means of funding to be identified for projects, including from the private sector; reiterates its support for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Investment Bank and coordinating with international investors;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially the co-presidency, biennial summit, joint permanent committee, senior officials’ meetings and creation of a joint secretariat, help to even out responsibilities within the partnership; looks forward, in thishopes that Parliament will be regularly updated on the stage reached in projects; welcomes in that respect, to the decisions of the first meeting of the foreign affairs ministers of the BP:UfM member countries, scheduled for 3 November 2008 adopted by the Ministerial Conference of 3 November 2008, which duly took note of the EMPA recommendation adopted in Jordan on 13 October 2008; supports the decision to bring a strong parliamentary dimension to the UfM, thereby reinforcing its democratic legitimacy, by building on the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA), which should be further consolidated and its work better articulated with that of the other institutions of the Partnership;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially the co-presidency, biennial summit, joint permanent committee, senior officials’ meetings and creation of a joint secretariat, help to even out responsibilities within the partnership; looks forward, in this respect, to the decishopes that it will be duly consulted on the creations of the first meeting of the foreign affairs ministersUfM’s permanent bodies and regularly updated ofn the BP:UfM member countries, scheduled for 3 November 2008stage reached in projects;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the decisions on the arrangements concerning the institutional set-up of this initiative to reflect the role played by EMPA and the European Parliament;deleted
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the recognition of EMPA as the legitimate parliamentary expression of the BP:UfM; calls for EMPA’s role to be strengthened by entitling igranting it legal personality and the right to propose and assess economic and regional integration strategies and projects, and allowing it to make recommendations to the meetings of foreign affairs ministers;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the fact that some of the countries participating in the BP:UfM are not part of the Barcelona Process; calls on the Council, the Commission and all the States participating in the BP:UfM to maintain, in this connection, a cohesive framework of relations in which it is clear that the Union for the Mediterranean is an expression of that partnership process and that its purpose is economic and regional integration between all Member States and all the countries of the Mediterranean basin;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Takes the view that the BP:UfM should step up existing forms of cooperation under EuroMed in order to provide all partner countries with the chance of participating in the Union’s regional programmes and corresponding policies on the basis of priorities and objectives set by mutual agreement, pointing to the importance of extending and intensifying the scope of Community programmes to include participation by partner countries, not least in the fields of education, research and professional training (student exchanges, etc.);
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 58 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law; calls for an assessment of what has been achieved so far and for adjustment of the instruments implemented under the partnership, including as regards other international organisations such as the Council of Europe; emphasises that the instruments for promoting human rights available under the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) must be exploited to the full, guaranteeing greater political cohesion between the European institutions and adapting appropriate incentive measures based on the principle of differentiation in ENP bilateral action plans;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Expresses its concern at the prevailing tendency among Member State governments to adopt a ‘security-first’ approach in Mediterranean poPoints out that the management of migratory flows requires partnership and genuine cooperation with third countries in the service of development; considers that immigration issues must focus on the possibilicties, and especially in the management for legal migration, the combating of illegal migratory flows and smoother integration of immigrationnt groups;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 75 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the widening economic, political and cultural gap between the two sides of the Mediterranean is liable to set back the objective ofwidening and those disparities need to be rectified in order eventually to creatinge an area of peace, security and shared prosperity,
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. emphasising the importance of the role played by EMPA, which is the only parliamentary assembly enabling dialogue and cooperation in the Euro-Mediterranean area to bring together the 27 EU Member States and all the parties connected with the Middle East peace process,
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2008/2111(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) urges EU Member states to redouble their efforts in ensuring the successful operation of the Human Rights Council while protecting and promoting universal rights; in this respect, calls for greater accountability in the procedure for the establishment and renewal of Special Procedures and for the appointment of mandate holders, which should be based on principles of transparency and real competition,
2008/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2008/2111(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) calls on all EU Member states to remain engaged in the preparations for the 2009 Durban Review Conference and to ensure that the Conference provides the opportunity for all stakeholders to renew their determination and commitment to fight racism, racial discrimination and related intolerance and to adopt concrete benchmarks with a view to the eradication of racism, on the basis of, and fully respecting, the Durban Declaration and the Programme of Action,
2008/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2008/2111(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point s
(s) calls on the Council to make sure that there is no recurrence of the negative events associated with the initial Durban conference; to that end, urges the Council to ensure that the 2009 Durban Review Conference takes place in Europe, possibly at the seat of the UN institutions in Bonn, Germanycalls on all EU Member States to make sure that Civil Society takes part in the 2009 Durban Review Conference in Geneva, in accordance with the UN Charter and Resolution 1996/31 of the UN Economic and Social Council of 25 July 1996,
2008/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall not detain asylum seekers in prison accommodation. Detention shall only be carried out in specialised detention facilities. Asylum seekers in detention shall be kept separately from other third country nationals who have not lodged an application for international protection unless it is necessary to ensure family unity and the applicant consents thereto.
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that applicants have access to the labour market no later than 612 months following the date when the application for international protection was lodged.
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The material reception conditions may be ensured in kind, in money, in vouchers or in a combination of these elements. If Member States ensure material reception conditions in money or in vouchers, their value shall be measured in accordance with the principles laid down in this Article.
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 91 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. In calculating the amount of assistance to be granted to asylum seekers Member States shall ensure that the total value of material reception conditions to be made available to asylum seekers is equivalent to the amount of social assistance granted to nationals requiring such assistance. Any differences in this respect shall be duly justified.deleted
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 100 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide necessary medical or other assistance to applicants who have special needs, including appropriate mental health care when needed, under the same conditions as nationals.deleted
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 107 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall establish procedures in national legislation with a view to identifying, as soon as an application for international protection is lodged, whether the applicant has special needs and indicating the nature of such needs. Member States shall ensure support for persons with special needs throughout the asylum procedure and shall provide for appropriate monitoring of their situation.
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 115 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Member States shall ensure access to legal assistance and/or representation in the cases referred to in paragraph 1. Such legal assistance and/or representation shall be free of charge where the asylum seeker cannot afford the costs involved, provided that there is sufficient likelihood that the legal proceedings will prove successful.
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 116 #

2008/0244(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall submit relevant information to the Commission in the form set out in Annex I on a yearly basis, starting from […]:deleted
2009/03/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 33 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The application of this Regulation may, in certain circumstances, create additional burdens on Member States faced with a particularly urgent situation which places an exceptionally heavy pressure on their reception capacities, asylum system or infrastructure. In such circumstances, it is necessary to lay down an efficient procedure to allow the temporary suspension of transfers towards the Member State concerned and to provide financial assistance, in accordance with existing EU financial instruments. The temporary suspension of Dublin transfers can thus contribute to achieve a higher degree of solidarity towards those Member States facing particular pressures on their asylum systems, due in particular to their geographical or demographic situation.deleted
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 34 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) This mechanism of suspension of transfers should be applied also when the Commission considers that the level of protection for applicants for international protection in a given Member State is not in conformity with Community legislation on asylum, in particular in terms of reception conditions and access to the asylum procedure, in view of ensuring that all applicants for international protection benefit from an adequate level of protection in all Member StatesDeleted
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 48 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
(e) the possibility to challenge a transfer decision;Deleted
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 57 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that a representative represents and/or assists the unaccompanied minor with respect to all procedures provided for in this Regulation. This representative may also be the representative referred to in Article 23 of Directive […/…/EC] [laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers].
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 89 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that the person concerned has access to legal assistance and/or representation and, where necessary, to linguistic assistance insofar as there are sufficient prospects for successfully prosecuting the claim.
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 107 #

2008/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Section VII – Article 31
Section VII: Temporary suspension of 1. When a Member State is faced with a particularly urgent situation which places an exceptionally heavy burden on its reception capacities, asylum system or infrastructure, and when the transfer of applicants for international protection in accordance with this Regulation to that Member State could add to that burden, that Member State may request that such transfers be suspended. The request shall be addressed to the Commission. It shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and shall in particular include: (a) a detailed description of the particularly urgent situation which places an exceptionally heavy burden on the requesting Member State’s reception capacities, asylum system or infrastructure, including relevant statistics and supporting evidence; (b) a substantiated forecast of the likely evolution of this situation in the short- term; (c) a substantiated explanation of the further burden that the transfer of applicants for international protection in accordance with this Regulation could add to the requesting Member State’s reception capacities, asylum system or infrastructure, including relevant statistics and other supporting evidence. 2. When the Commission considers that the circumstances prevailing in a Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and with Directive 2005/85/EC, it may decide in conformity with the procedure laid down in paragraph 4, that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended. 3. When a Member State is concerned that the circumstances prevailing in another Member State may lead to a level of protection for applicants for international protection which is not in conformity with Community legislation, in particular with Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and with Directive 2005/85/EC, it may request that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended. The request shall be addressed to the Commission. It shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and shall in particular include detailed information on the situation in the concerned Member State pointing to a possible lack of conformity with Community legislation, in particular Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers and Directive 2005/85/EC. 4. Following the receipt of a request pursuant to paragraphs 1 or 3, or upon its own initiative pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission may decide that all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned be suspended. Such decision shall be taken as soon as possible and at the latest one month following the receipt of a request. The decision to suspend transfers shall state the reasons on which it is based and shall in particular include: (a) an examination of all the relevant circumstances prevailing in the Member State towards which transfers could be suspended; (b) an examination of the potential impact of the suspension of transfers on the other Member States; (c) the proposed date on which the suspension of transfers shall take effect; (d) any particular conditions attached to such suspension. 5. The Commission shall notify the Council and the Member States of the decision to suspend all transfers of applicants in accordance with this Regulation to the Member State concerned. Any Member State may refer the decision of the Commission to the Council within one month from the receipt of the notification. The Council, acting by qualified majority, may take a different decision in one month from the date of the referral by a Member State. 6. Following the decision of the Commission to suspend transfers to a Member State, the other Member States in which the applicants whose transfers have been suspended are present, shall be responsible for examining the applications for international protection of those persons. The decision to suspend transfers to a Member State shall take due account of the need to ensure the protection of minors and of family unity 7. A decision to suspend transfers to a Member State pursuant to paragraph 1 shall justify the granting of assistance for the emergency measures laid down in Article 5 of Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, following a request for assistance from that Member State. 8. Transfers may be suspended for a period which cannot exceed six months. Where the grounds for the measures still persist after six months, the Commission may decide, upon a request from the Member State concerned referred to paragraph 1 or upon its own initiative, to extend their application for a further six months period. Paragraph 5 applies. 9. Nothing in this Article shall be interpreted as allowing Member States to derogate from their general obligation to take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of their obligations arising out of the Community legislation on asylum, in particular this Regulation, Directive […/…/EC] laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, and Directive 2005/85/EC.deleted transfers Article 31
2009/04/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 44 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In its accompanying communication ‘Non-discrimination and equal opportunities: A renewed commitment’ of 2 July 2008 (COM(2008)0420 final), the Commission affirmed that the European Union already has one of the most advanced non-discrimination legal frameworks in the world.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 48 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Therefore, legislation should prohibit discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation in a range of areas outside the labour market, including social protection, education and access to and supply of goods and services, including housing. It should provide for measures to ensure the equal access of persons with disabilities to the areas covered.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 55 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) This Directive ishould be without prejudice to the exercise of the competences of the Member States in the areas of education, and social protection, including social security and health care. It ishould also be without prejudice to the essential role and wide discretion of the Member States in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 59 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which, in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 61 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Owing to the excessive burden on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), they should be afforded special protection, following the model of the US Civil Rights Act.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 68 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In implementing the principle of equal treatment irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, the Community should, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the EC Treaty, aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality between men and women, especially since women are often the victims of multiple discrimination.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 73 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Differences in treatment in connection with age and disability may be permitted under certain circumstances if they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary. Such differences of treatment may include, for example, special age conditions regarding access to certain goods or services such as alcoholic drinks, arms, or driving licences. A legitimate aim may also be the promotion of the economic, cultural or social integration of young or old persons or persons with disabilities. Therefore, measures setting more favourable conditions for these persons, such as free or reduced fares for transport, museums, or sports facilities, are presumed to be compatible with the principle of non- discrimination.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 77 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Actuarial and risk factors related to disability and to age are used in the provision of insurance, banking and other financial services. These should not be regarded as constituting discrimination where the factors arcan be shown to be key factors for the assessment of risk.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 79 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Actuarial and risk factors related to disability and to age are used in the provision of insurance, banking and other financial services. These should not be regarded as constituting discrimination where thesuch factors are shown to be keydetermining factors for the assessment of risk.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 84 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) All individuals enjoy complethe freedom to contract, including the freedom to choose a contractual partner for a transaction. This Directive shoulddoes not apply to economic transactions undertaken by individuals for whom these transactions do not constitute their professional or commercial activity. In this context the concept of professional or commercial activity must be defined in accordance with national laws and Member States’ practice.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 86 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) All individuals enjoy the freedom to contract, including the freedom to choose a contractual partner for a transaction. This Directive should not apply to economic transactions undertaken by individuals for whom these transactions do not constitute their professional or commercial activity.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 91 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) While prohibiting discrimination, it is important to respect other fundamental rights and freedoms, including the protection of private and family life and transactions carried out in that context, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of association. This Directive is without prejudice to national laws on marital or family status, including on reproductive rights. It is also without prejudice to the secular nature of the State, state institutions or bodies, or educationThis Directive does not apply to matters covered by family law, including marital status, and laws on reproductive rights. It is also without prejudice to the secular nature of the State, state institutions or bodies, or education. Moreover, this Directive is without prejudice to the powers of the Member States to organise their social security and health care schemes in such a way as to guarantee their sustainability.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 98 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) While prohibiting discrimination, it is important to respect other fundamental rights and freedoms, including the protection of private and family life and transactions carried out in that context, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of association. This Directive is without prejudice to national laws on marital or family status and the value thereof, including on reproductive and adoption rights. It is also without prejudice to the secular nature of the State, state institutions or bodies, or education.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 100 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In accordance with the aim and the scope of the present Directive and of previous Directives adopted on the same legal basis, this Directive seeks to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, age, disability and sexual orientation in relation to the access to social protection, including social security and healthcare; social advantages; education; and the access to, and the supply of, goods and other services which are available to the public, including housing. The Member States retain their general competences in these areas.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 106 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Member States are responsible for the organisation and content of education. The Commission Communication on Competences for the 21st Century: An Agenda for European Cooperation on Schools draws attention to the need for special attention to be paid to disadvantaged children and those with special educational needs. In particular national law may provide for differences in access to educational institutions based on religion or belief. Member States may also allow or prohibit the wearing or display of religious symbols at schoolis Directive does not apply to the content of teaching or activities and the organisation of national educational systems, including the provision of special needs education.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 116 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) The European Union in its Declaration No 11 on the status of churches and non- confessional organisations, annexed to the Final Act of the Amsterdam Treaty, has explicitly recognised that it respects and does not prejudice the status under national law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States and that it equally respects the status of philosophical and non-confessional organisations. This Directive therefore respects national legislation guaranteeing their status and activities and shall not apply thereto. Measures to enable persons with disabilities to have effective non- discriminatory access to the areas covered by this Directive play an important part in ensuring full equality in practice. Furthermore, individual measures of reasonable accommodation may be required in some cases to ensure such access. In neither case are measures required that would impose a disproportionate burden. In assessing whether the burden is disproportionate, account should be taken of a number of factors including the size, resources and nature of the organisation. The principle of reasonable accommodation and disproportionate burden are established in Directive 2000/78/EC and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 120 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The prohibition of discrimination should be without prejudice to the maintenance or adoption by Member States of measures intended to prevent or compensate for disadvantages suffered by a group of persons of a particular religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. Such measures may permit organisations of persons of a particular religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation where their main object is the promotion of the special needs of those persons.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 124 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Persons who have been subject to discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation should have adequate means of legal protection. To provide a more effective level of protection, associations, organisations and other legal entities should be empowered to engage in proceedings, including on behalf of or in support of any victim, without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 132 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1
This Directive lays down a framework for combating discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation, with a view to putting into effect in the Member States the principle of equal treatment other than in the field of employment and occupation.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 142 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
(b) indirect discrimination shall be taken to occur where an apparently neutral provision, criterion or practice would put persons of a particular religion or belief, a particular disability, a particular age, or a particular sexual orientation at a particular disadvantage compared with other persons, unless that provision, criterion or practice is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 144 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment shall be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.deleted
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 145 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment shall be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment, as defined and recognised by the laws of the Member States, can be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 146 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment i, as deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an fined by the laws of the Member States, can be deemed to be a form of discriminatimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environmenton within the meaning of paragraph 1.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 147 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment shall be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. In this context, the concepts of harassment and unwanted conduct may be defined in accordance with the national laws and practice of the Member States.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 149 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment shall be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. In this context, the concept of harassment may be defined in accordance with the national laws and practice of the Member States.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 152 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Harassment shallmay also be deemed to be a form of discrimination within the meaning of paragraph 1, when unwanted conduct related to any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 takes place with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 165 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, Member States may provide that differences of treatment on grounds of age shall not constitute discrimination, if, within the context of national law, they are justified by a legitimate aim, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary. In particular, this Directive shall not preclude the fixing of a specific age for access to social benefits,This Directive does not preclude differences of treatment on grounds of age and disability, if they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary. Such differences of treatment may include the fixing of a specific age for access to social protection, including social security and healthcare; social advantages; education; and certain goods or services which are available to the public. The following are deemed to be compatible with the principle of non- discrimination: the setting of more favourable conditions for access to social protection, including social security and healthcare; social advantages; education; and certain goods or services which are available to the public, for young or old persons or for persons with disabilities, in order to promote their economic, cultural or social integration.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 167 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, Member States may provide that differences of treatment on the grounds of agelaid down in Article 1 shall not constitute discrimination, if, within the context of national law, they are justified by a legitimate aim, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary there is an objective reason for the violation thereof. In particular, this Directive shall not preclude the fixing of a specific age for access to social benefits, education and certain goods or services.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 176 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, in the provision of financial services Member States may permit proportionate differences in treatment where, for the product in question, the use of age or disability is a keydetermining factor in the assessment of risk based on relevant and accurate actuarial or statistical datactuarial principles, accurate statistical data or medical knowledge shall not be considered discrimination for the purposes of this Directive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 178 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, in the provision of financial services Member States may permit proportionate differences in treatment where, for the product in question, the use of age orand disability is a keydetermining factor in the assessment of risk based on relevant and accurate actuarial or statistical datactuarial principals, accurate statistical data or medical knowledge shall not be considered as discrimination for the purposes of this directive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 189 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Within the limits of the powers conferred upon the Community, the prohibition of discrimination shall apply to all persons, as regards both the public and private sectors, including public bodies, provided they are performing a professional or commercial activity, in relation to:
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 190 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point c
(c) education;deleted
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 192 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) Access to and supply of goods and other services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activityThis directive should not apply to transactions undertaken by individuals for whom these transactions do not constitute a professional or commercial activity. In this context, the concept of professional or commercial activity may be defined in accordance with the national laws and practice of the Member states. Subparagraph (d) does not concern existing private and business buildings.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 196 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activity.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 197 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall not apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activityexisting private and business premises.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 199 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) Access to and supply of goods and other services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activitydoes not concern existing private and business buildings.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 200 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) Access to and supply of goods and other services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activity.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 201 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point d
(d) Access to and supply of goods and other services which are available to the public, including housing. Subparagraph (d) shall apply to individuals only insofar as they are performing a professional or commercial activdoesn’t cover transactions between private individuals acting in a private capacity.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 208 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive is without prejudice to national laws on marital or family statusegislation on marriage, family status and the benefits dependent thereon and reproductive rights.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 209 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive is without prejudicedoes not apply to nmational laws on marital or familyters covered by family law, including marital status, and laws on reproductive rights.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 211 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive is without prejudice to national laws on marital or family status and reproductivetheir importance and reproductive and adoption rights.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 218 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. This Directive is without prejudice to the responsibilities of Member States fordoes not apply to the content of teaching, or activities and the organisation of theirnational educational systems, including the provision of special needs education. Member States may provide for differencesThis Directive is without prejudice to conditions based on religion or belief in treatment inspect of access to educational institutions, the ethos of which is based on religion or belief, in accordance with national laws, traditions and practice. It is also without prejudice to national measures authorising or prohibiting the wearing of religious symbols.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 239 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The advertising and media sector shall be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 247 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) The measures necessary to enable persons with disabilities to have effective non-discriminatory access to social protection, social advantages, health care, education and access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, including housing and transportelecommunications, electronic communication, information, also in accessible formats, modes of transport and other public spaces and facilities, shall be provided by anticipation, including through appropriate modifications or adjustments. Such measures should not impose a disproportionate burden, nor require fundamental alteration of the social protection, social advantages, health care, education, ornature of the goods or services in question or of the nature of the trade, profession or undertaking in question. An alteration shall be regarded as fundamental if it alters the goods or services or the nature of a trade, profession or undertaking to such an extent that the provider of the goods andor services in question or require the provision of alternatives thes effectively providing a completely different kind of good or service. Extensive alterations to existing private and business premises shall constitute a disproportionate burden. In addition, Member States may determine what modifications or adjustments are to be considered appropriate.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 248 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) The measures necessary to enable persons with disabilities to have effective non-discriminatory access to social protection, social advantages, health care, education and access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, including housing and transport, shall be provided by anticipation, including through appropriate modificatioelecommunications, electronic communication and information, as well as in accessible formats and means of trans por adjustmentt, and other public spaces and institutions. Such measures should not impose a disproportionate burden, nor require fundamesubstantial alteration of the social protecnature of the goods or services involved. An alteration, social advantages, health care, education, or goods and services in question or require the provision of alternatives theretohall be substantial if the good or service offered by the provider is entirely changed in terms of its purpose or destination. Major restructuring of premises or an extension to a building shall constitute a disproportionate burden.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 253 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) No breach of the ban on disadvantaging individuals shall be deemed to have occurred if there is an objective reason justifying a difference in treatment on grounds of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. In particular, this may be the case if the difference in treatment 1. is intended to rule out risks or prevent damage or to serve other, similar purposes, 2. takes account of the requirement to protect privacy or personal safety, 3. offers special advantages and there can be no interest in enforcing equal treatment. In connection with the rental of housing, different treatment with a view to establishing and maintaining socially stable tenancy patterns and balanced settlement structures and balanced economic, social and cultural conditions shall be admissible.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 255 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) NotwithstandingWithout prejudice to the obligation to ensure effective non-discriminatory access and where needed in a particular case, reasonable accommodation shall be provided unless this would impose a disproportionate burden. For the purposes of this provision, "reasonable accommodation" means measures needed in a particular case to enable a person with a disability to have access to and enjoy or exercise on an equal basis with others rights concerning social protection, including social security and health care, social advantages, education and access to goods and services in the meaning of Article 3, paragraph 1.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 260 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of assessing whether measures necessary to comply with paragraph 1 would impose a disproportionate burden, account shall be taken, in particular, of the size and resources of the organisation or enterprise, its nature, the estimated cost, the life cycle of the goods and services, and the possible benefits of increased access for persons with disabilities. The burden shall not be deemed disproportionate when it is sufficiently remedied by measures existing within the framework of the equal treatment policy of the Member State concerned. Extensive rebuilding of existing private and business buildings shall constitute a disproportionate burden.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 266 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When defining what constitutes a ‘disproportionate burden’ within the meaning of the second sentence of paragraph 1(a) and paragraph 1(b), due account shall be taken of the laws on equal treatment of persons with disabilities in force in each Member State and the interpretation of those laws by national courts.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 267 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In order to take account of particular conditions, the Member States may, if necessary, have an additional period of [X] years from the deadline for transposition to comply with paragraphs 1.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 272 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5
With a view to ensurpromoting full equality in practice, the principle of equal treatment shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or adopting specific measures to prevent or compensate for disadvantages linked to religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation, with the exception of quota systems and automatic recruitment measures.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 274 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5
5. With a view to ensuring full equality in practice, the principle of equal treatment shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or adopting specific measures to prevent or compensate for disadvantages linked to religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 275 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that judicial and/or administrative procedures, including where they deem it appropriate conciliation procedures, for the enforcement of obligations under this Directive are available to all persons who consider themselves wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment to them, even after the relationship in which the discrimination is alleged to have occurred has ended.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 278 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that associations, organisations or other legal entities, which have a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions of this Directive are complied with, may engage, either on behalf or in support of the complainant, with his or her approval, in any judicial and/or administrative procedure provided for the enforcement of obligations under this Directive.deleted
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 280 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall, where their judicial or administrative rules of procedure so permit, ensure that associations, organisations or other legal entities, which have a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions of this Directive are complied with, may engage, either on behalf or in support of the complainant, with his or her approval, in any judicial and/or administrative procedure provided by national laws for the enforcement of obligations under this Directive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 282 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – second subparagraph a (new)
This paragraph is without prejudice to the national judicial or administrative rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 286 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall, in accordance with their judicial systems, ensure that all persons who consider themselves wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment to them may seek judicial redress in court within the time limit set by the national laws.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 287 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure, in accordance with their national judicial systems, that all persons who consider themselves wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment to them can take legal action to assert their rights.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 289 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8
1. Member States shall take such measures as are necessary, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when persons who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal treatment has not been applied to them establish, before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the prohibition of discrimination. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not prevent Member States from introducing rules of evidence which are more favourable to plaintiffs. 3. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to criminal procedures. 4. Member States need not apply paragraph 1 to proceedings in which the court or competent body investigates the facts of the case. 5. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall also apply to any legal proceedings commenced in accordance with Article 7(2).deleted
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 292 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shallmay take such measures as are necessary, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when persons who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal treatment has not been applied to them and facts suggesting the existence of discrimination have been establish,ed before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the prohibition of discrimination. This paragraph is without prejudice to existing national rules of procedure concerning the burden of proof in civil and criminal matters. In any event, adaptation of the rules on the burden of proof is only possible if the presumption is established and verified by a court or a competent body.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 299 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate a body or bodies for the promotion of equal treatment of all persons irrespective of their religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation. These bodies may form part of agencies charged at national level with the defence of human rights or the safeguard of individuals' rights, including rights under other Community acts including Directives 2000/43/EC and 2004/113/EC.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 318 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14
Member States shall lay down the rules on sanctions applicable to breaches of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are applied. Sanctions may comprise the payment of compensation, which may not be restricted by the fixing of a prior upper limit, and must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 321 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by …. at the latest [twohree years after adoption]. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof and shall communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 14 #

2007/2267(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas in the past two years of negotiation Croatia has made substantial and commendable progress in most areas covert is essential that the reform of the public service and the legal system, carried out alongside the reform of the police, be successfully completed byif the corpus of Community lawriteria for accession to the European Union are to be met,
2008/02/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2007/2267(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that an overall strategic framework for the reform of the public service, including substantially improved administrative procedures and full implementation of the Civil Service Act, has still not yet been adopted; urges Croatia to speed up the process of public service reform in local and regional self- government, and to supply the necessary resources and training for the implementation of these reforms;
2008/02/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2007/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to provide for a mechanism to stop transfers of asylum applicants to Member States that do notensure that every Member State guarantees full and fair treatment of their claims;
2008/06/09
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 35 #

2007/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Asks the Commission to amend Articles 19 and 20 of the Dublin Regulation on 'taking charge and taking back', so as to provide applicants with an automatic suspensive right of appeal against a decision to transfer responsibility to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation;deleted
2008/06/09
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 38 #

2007/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. RegretNotes that the definition of a family member under the current Regulation is toocontains a restrictive and asks the Commission to extend the present definition to include at least dependants such as close relatives who have no other family support, and adult children unable to care for themselvesdefinition of a family member;
2008/06/09
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 47 #

2007/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that where an asylum seeker is in a particularly vulnerable state owing to a serious illness, a severe handicap, old age or pregnancy, and he or she is therefore dependent on the assistance of a relative present in the territory of an Member State other than the one in charge of the examination of the application, he or she should, alwayss far as possible, be reunited with that relative; asks the Commission to consider making compulsory the relevant provisions of the humanitarian clause in Article 15(2);
2008/06/09
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2 #

2007/2202(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to make use of all the instruments available, including positive action, to ensure equality in practice and to give greater weight to the evidence of discrimination;
2008/03/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 6 #

2007/2202(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that the Directives do not coverTakes the view that differences in treatment based on nationality or language; believes that those differences, if that are not objectively justified by a legitimate aim and achieved by appropriate and necessary means, often may constitute indirect discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin;
2008/03/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 10 #

2007/2202(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that minority communities, and in particular the Roma one, need specific social protection, since the problems of exploitation, discrimination and exclusion have become even more acute in their regard further to enlargement;
2008/03/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 36 #

2007/0248(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) When implementing measures transposing Directive 2002/58/EC, the authorities and courts of the Member States must not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with the directive but also make sure that they do not rely on an interpretation of the directive which would be in conflict with other fundamental rights or general principles of Community law, such as the principle of proportionality.
2008/06/10
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2007/0248(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 2 - point -7 d (new)
Directive 2002/58/EC
Article 15 - paragraph 1
(-7d) In Article 15, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: 1. Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in Article 5, Article 6, Article 8(1), (2), (3) and (4), and Article 9 of this Directive when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security (i.e. State security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system, as well as the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, as referred to in Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46/EC. To this end, Member States may, inter alia, adopt legislative measures providing for the retention of data for a limited period justified on the grounds laid down in this paragraph. All the measures referred to in this paragraph shall be in accordance with the general principles of Community law, including those referred to in Article 6(1) and (2) of the Treaty on European Union.
2008/06/10
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #

2007/0247(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 8 - point e
Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive)
Article 8 - paragraph 4 - point g a (new)
(ga) ensuring cooperation between undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services and the relevant sectors, for protection and promotion of lawful content in connection with those networks and services.
2008/05/16
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 22 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The period of validity of the single permit is to be determined by each Member State.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Third-country nationals who have been admitted to the territory of a Member State for a period not exceeding 6 months in any twelve-month period to work on a seasonal basis should not be covered by the Directive given their temporary status and the fact that they will be governed by a specific directive.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 28 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Beneficiaries of temporary protection should be subject to this directive as regards the common set of rights, as they are authorised to work legally within the territory of a Member State.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 36 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point (a)
(a) a single application procedure for issuing a single permit for third country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State, in order to simplify the procedure for their admission and to facilitate the control of their status and;
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 37 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point (b)
(b) a common set of rights to third country workers legally residing in a Member State, irrespective of the purposes for which they were initially admitted to the territory of a Member State.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 41 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point (b)
(b) "third-country worker" means any third- country national who has been admitted to the territory of a Member State and is allowed to stay and work legally in that Member State, excluding self-employed workers;
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 43 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) education in the broad sense of the term (language learning and cultural familiarisation with a view to improving integration) and vocational training;
2008/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (b)
(b) to third-country workers legally residing in a Member State, irrespective of the purposes for which they were initially admitted to the territory of a Member State.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 46 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) recognition of diplomas, certificates and other professional qualifications in accordance with the relevant national procedures; applicable pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications1. 1 OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 22.
2008/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) tax benefits, if the worker is resident for tax purposes in the Member State concerned;
2008/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) access to goods and services and the supply of goods and services made available to the public including procedures for obtaining housing and the assistance afforaccess to administrative and other procedures for obtaining private or public housing and advisory services provided by employment officagencies.
2008/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point (d) a (new)
(da) who have been admitted to the territory of a Member State in order to work there for a period not exceeding six months, as regards solely the field of the single procedure;
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 54 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 - introductory part
2. Member States may restrict equal treatment with nationals: only in the following cases:
2008/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. It shall be the responsibility of Member States to determine whether the application for a single permit is to be submitted by the third-country national concerned, by his future employer or by either.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 69 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
If the applicant's permit expires before a decision has been taken on his renewal application, the Member State responsible for considering the application shall authorise the person concerned and, where applicable, his family, to stay legally within its territory until a decision is taken concerning his application for renewal of the single permit.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Any decision rejecting the application, not granting, modifying or renewing, suspending or withdrawing a single permit shall be open to challenge before the courtlodged with the competent authorities of the Member State concerned. The written notification shall specify the possible redress procedures available and the time-limit for taking action.
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 87 #

2007/0229(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – introductory clause
During the period of its validity as determined by each Member State, the single permit shall entitle its holder as a minimum to:
2008/10/15
Committee: LIBE