BETA


2008/2240(INI) Greening transport package and the internalisation of external costs

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN JARZEMBOWSKI Georg (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2009/10/06
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 452 votes to 108, with 134 abstentions, a resolution on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects.

Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step . Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector. They observe that the Commission has already taken preliminary initiatives which should ultimately lead to a comprehensive strategy for the internalisation of external costs in all modes of transport; but has so far instead:

adopted a piecemeal approach drawn up in a Handbook for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors (see the 'Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector'), has submitted a proposal to amend Directive 1999/62/EC (the Eurovignette Directive), which is intended to permit Member States to charge for the external costs arising from heavy goods vehicles, in line with Article 11 of that Directive, proposed taxing the external costs caused by rail noise via noise-differentiated infrastructure charges.

The Commission is invited to: (i) where every mode of transport is concerned, provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener , taking into account the international conventions in force and the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; (ii) with reference to those proposals, conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness; and, proceeding from that basis, (iii) submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport , together with specific legislative proposals.

Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport.

Parliament notes that the Commission, in its communication, has put forward scientifically coherent justifications for the charging of individual external costs to various modes of transport, and has adopted what it terms a "pragmatic approach based on the average cost". MEPs generally support the Commission's basis of marginal social cost pricing , in line with the White Paper on Transport of 2001. The Commission is asked to explicitly take account of the "polluter pays" principle . Parliament calls on the Commission, however, in further steps with regard to the internalisation of external costs, to take account of all forms of internalisation of external costs which already exist, such as oil taxes and road tolls.

Parliament calls on the Commission, when putting forward further proposals to green the transport sector, to include assessments of the impact of competition between transport modes and associated social and environmental impacts and to include the costs of mobility and competitiveness.

Parliament regrets the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission is called upon to (i) remedy these shortcomings as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TEN-T); (ii) submit a supplementary proposal for multimodal mobility corridors ( 'green corridors' ) as part of the review of the TEN-T, offsetting the burdens imposed by the present proposal by enabling accessibility and mobility without obstacles.

Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model.

Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition.

Parliament looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.

Documents
2009/03/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/02/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/02/16
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/02/11
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted an own-initiative report by Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE) on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects.

Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step. Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector, and has so far instead:

adopted a piecemeal approach by submitting a first basic set of guidelines for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors; again opted for a “stepwise solution” by starting with a specific proposal for immediate application for higher road tolls for heavy goods vehicles by amending Directive 1999/62/EC (Eurovignette Directive) which is intended to permit Member States to charge for external costs, and even this would apply only in Member States that so wished, and, as regards rail noise abatement, listed a range of options and future measures.

The committee calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener. It wants the Commission to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness. Proceeding from that basis, the Commission should submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport, together with specific legislative proposals .

Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport. It expresses disappointed that the positive effects of transport in terms of economic growth and competitiveness ('positive externalities') have not been researched to any significant extent and have not been taken into account in the Commission's calculations, unlike external costs which have been the subject of extensive work. The committee recognises the role of the 'Polluter Pays Principle' and expects the Commission to develop this pragmatic approach. It recognises the contributions made to date by the various modes of transport in the form of general taxation, vehicle and oil taxes, and road tolls to balance out real infrastructure building and maintenance costs and views this as the starting point for future work.

Members also note the fact that the Commission has not attempted to assess the impact that its proposed method for internalising external costs might have on competition among the various modes of transport and on the costs of mobility and calls on the Commission to do so. They also deplore the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission should do so as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TENs).

The committee feels that the Commission is behaving inconsistently on several counts in that it maintains that the internalisation of external costs should also apply to cars, but does not even supply related calculations, preferring instead to maintain the freedom of Member States to charge passenger cars as they see fit. It therefore asks the Commission to publish a methodology for internalising the external costs of individual vehicles in order to provide Member States with guidelines in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.

Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model.

Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition.

The report looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.

2008/11/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/10/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/06/23
   EP - JARZEMBOWSKI Georg (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 6 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: -: 387, +: 280, 0: 13
SE ES PT AT DK MT FR NL EE EL BE CY LU FI DE IE BG SI LV CZ SK HU IT LT RO GB PL
Total
15
46
21
17
14
4
64
24
6
22
23
6
5
12
91
11
17
7
7
20
13
21
61
12
30
65
46
icon: PSE PSE
193
3

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3
icon: NI NI
24

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

6

Poland NI

1
icon: UEN UEN
40

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

4

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 7 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: -: 391, +: 284, 0: 12
SE NL FR AT PT DK ES MT EE BE BG CY FI EL HU LU IE SI LV CZ SK LT DE RO IT PL GB
Total
17
24
64
16
21
14
46
5
5
25
17
6
14
22
20
6
11
7
7
20
13
12
91
31
62
44
67
icon: PSE PSE
194

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
5
icon: NI NI
26

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: UEN UEN
40

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

For (1)

5

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 3 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: -: 577, +: 94, 0: 14
DK SE CY LU MT IE FI SI EE LV AT LT CZ SK BG NL BE HU PT EL RO ES IT DE FR PL GB
Total
13
18
6
6
4
9
13
7
6
7
17
12
21
13
17
25
23
23
21
21
31
45
62
89
66
46
64
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: NI NI
24

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: UEN UEN
39

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
87

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
194

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Finland PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
257

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PPE-DE

5

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 2 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: -: 412, +: 272, 0: 11
SE FR PT AT DK MT ES EE EL BE CY NL FI BG LU SI LV CZ IE SK HU LT RO DE GB IT PL
Total
18
65
21
17
14
5
45
6
21
25
6
26
14
17
6
7
7
22
11
13
22
12
31
91
64
63
46
icon: PSE PSE
198

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
26

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1
icon: UEN UEN
39

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
257

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - résolution #

2009/03/11 Outcome: +: 452, 0: 134, -: 108
ES DE IT FR RO GB HU BG LT NL SK PT BE EL FI CZ IE DK SI LV PL EE AT LU MT CY SE
Total
45
92
64
64
30
67
23
17
12
26
13
21
24
21
14
22
11
14
7
7
45
6
16
6
4
6
17
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
259

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
89
2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PSE PSE
193

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

4
icon: NI NI
26

Italy NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

2

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
40

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
78 2008/2240(INI)
2008/11/20 TRAN 78 amendments...
source: PE-415.142

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/2/date
Old
2009-02-17T00:00:00
New
2009-02-16T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.008
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.008
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.142
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.142
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2009-02-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2009
events/2
date
2009-02-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2009
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE
events/5
date
2009-03-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0119_EN.html title: T6-0119/2009
summary
events/5
date
2009-03-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0119_EN.html title: T6-0119/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2008-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-119
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0119_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg
  • date: 2009-02-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16762&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-119 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0119/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2008-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2008-06-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg
docs
  • date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.008 title: PE414.008 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.142 title: PE415.142 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16762&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3244 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted an own-initiative report by Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE) on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects. Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step. Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector, and has so far instead: adopted a piecemeal approach by submitting a first basic set of guidelines for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors; again opted for a “stepwise solution” by starting with a specific proposal for immediate application for higher road tolls for heavy goods vehicles by amending Directive 1999/62/EC (Eurovignette Directive) which is intended to permit Member States to charge for external costs, and even this would apply only in Member States that so wished, and, as regards rail noise abatement, listed a range of options and future measures. The committee calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener. It wants the Commission to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness. Proceeding from that basis, the Commission should submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport, together with specific legislative proposals . Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport. It expresses disappointed that the positive effects of transport in terms of economic growth and competitiveness ('positive externalities') have not been researched to any significant extent and have not been taken into account in the Commission's calculations, unlike external costs which have been the subject of extensive work. The committee recognises the role of the 'Polluter Pays Principle' and expects the Commission to develop this pragmatic approach. It recognises the contributions made to date by the various modes of transport in the form of general taxation, vehicle and oil taxes, and road tolls to balance out real infrastructure building and maintenance costs and views this as the starting point for future work. Members also note the fact that the Commission has not attempted to assess the impact that its proposed method for internalising external costs might have on competition among the various modes of transport and on the costs of mobility and calls on the Commission to do so. They also deplore the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission should do so as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TENs). The committee feels that the Commission is behaving inconsistently on several counts in that it maintains that the internalisation of external costs should also apply to cars, but does not even supply related calculations, preferring instead to maintain the freedom of Member States to charge passenger cars as they see fit. It therefore asks the Commission to publish a methodology for internalising the external costs of individual vehicles in order to provide Member States with guidelines in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model. Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition. The report looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2009
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16762&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-119 title: T6-0119/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 452 votes to 108, with 134 abstentions, a resolution on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects. Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step . Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector. They observe that the Commission has already taken preliminary initiatives which should ultimately lead to a comprehensive strategy for the internalisation of external costs in all modes of transport; but has so far instead: adopted a piecemeal approach drawn up in a Handbook for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors (see the 'Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector'), has submitted a proposal to amend Directive 1999/62/EC (the Eurovignette Directive), which is intended to permit Member States to charge for the external costs arising from heavy goods vehicles, in line with Article 11 of that Directive, proposed taxing the external costs caused by rail noise via noise-differentiated infrastructure charges. The Commission is invited to: (i) where every mode of transport is concerned, provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener , taking into account the international conventions in force and the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; (ii) with reference to those proposals, conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness; and, proceeding from that basis, (iii) submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport , together with specific legislative proposals. Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport. Parliament notes that the Commission, in its communication, has put forward scientifically coherent justifications for the charging of individual external costs to various modes of transport, and has adopted what it terms a "pragmatic approach based on the average cost". MEPs generally support the Commission's basis of marginal social cost pricing , in line with the White Paper on Transport of 2001. The Commission is asked to explicitly take account of the "polluter pays" principle . Parliament calls on the Commission, however, in further steps with regard to the internalisation of external costs, to take account of all forms of internalisation of external costs which already exist, such as oil taxes and road tolls. Parliament calls on the Commission, when putting forward further proposals to green the transport sector, to include assessments of the impact of competition between transport modes and associated social and environmental impacts and to include the costs of mobility and competitiveness. Parliament regrets the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission is called upon to (i) remedy these shortcomings as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TEN-T); (ii) submit a supplementary proposal for multimodal mobility corridors ( 'green corridors' ) as part of the review of the TEN-T, offsetting the burdens imposed by the present proposal by enabling accessibility and mobility without obstacles. Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model. Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition. Parliament looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
TRAN/6/66808
New
  • TRAN/6/66808
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.20 Transport policy in general
  • 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
  • 3.70.20 Sustainable development
New
3.20
Transport policy in general
3.70.02
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
3.70.20
Sustainable development
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg
  • date: 2009-02-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16762&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-119 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0119/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: JARZEMBOWSKI Georg
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
TRAN/6/66808
reference
2008/2240(INI)
title
Greening transport package and the internalisation of external costs
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject