Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | JARZEMBOWSKI Georg ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 452 votes to 108, with 134 abstentions, a resolution on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects.
Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step . Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector. They observe that the Commission has already taken preliminary initiatives which should ultimately lead to a comprehensive strategy for the internalisation of external costs in all modes of transport; but has so far instead:
adopted a piecemeal approach drawn up in a Handbook for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors (see the 'Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector'), has submitted a proposal to amend Directive 1999/62/EC (the Eurovignette Directive), which is intended to permit Member States to charge for the external costs arising from heavy goods vehicles, in line with Article 11 of that Directive, proposed taxing the external costs caused by rail noise via noise-differentiated infrastructure charges.
The Commission is invited to: (i) where every mode of transport is concerned, provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener , taking into account the international conventions in force and the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; (ii) with reference to those proposals, conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness; and, proceeding from that basis, (iii) submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport , together with specific legislative proposals.
Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport.
Parliament notes that the Commission, in its communication, has put forward scientifically coherent justifications for the charging of individual external costs to various modes of transport, and has adopted what it terms a "pragmatic approach based on the average cost". MEPs generally support the Commission's basis of marginal social cost pricing , in line with the White Paper on Transport of 2001. The Commission is asked to explicitly take account of the "polluter pays" principle . Parliament calls on the Commission, however, in further steps with regard to the internalisation of external costs, to take account of all forms of internalisation of external costs which already exist, such as oil taxes and road tolls.
Parliament calls on the Commission, when putting forward further proposals to green the transport sector, to include assessments of the impact of competition between transport modes and associated social and environmental impacts and to include the costs of mobility and competitiveness.
Parliament regrets the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission is called upon to (i) remedy these shortcomings as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TEN-T); (ii) submit a supplementary proposal for multimodal mobility corridors ( 'green corridors' ) as part of the review of the TEN-T, offsetting the burdens imposed by the present proposal by enabling accessibility and mobility without obstacles.
Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model.
Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition.
Parliament looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted an own-initiative report by Georg JARZEMBOWSKI (EPP-ED, DE) on the greening of transport and the internalisation of external costs in response to the three Commission Communications on these subjects.
Greening transport : the Commission communication on greening transport is welcomed as an important first partial step. Members regret that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, covering every transport sector, and has so far instead:
adopted a piecemeal approach by submitting a first basic set of guidelines for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors; again opted for a “stepwise solution” by starting with a specific proposal for immediate application for higher road tolls for heavy goods vehicles by amending Directive 1999/62/EC (Eurovignette Directive) which is intended to permit Member States to charge for external costs, and even this would apply only in Member States that so wished, and, as regards rail noise abatement, listed a range of options and future measures.
The committee calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener. It wants the Commission to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness. Proceeding from that basis, the Commission should submit an integrated plan for the greening of transport, together with specific legislative proposals .
Internalisation of external costs : the report notes that the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligation imposed on it by the Eurovignette Directive, since it has not put forward a generally applicable model for the assessment of external costs as a whole, given that it has not analysed the impact on every mode of transport. It expresses disappointed that the positive effects of transport in terms of economic growth and competitiveness ('positive externalities') have not been researched to any significant extent and have not been taken into account in the Commission's calculations, unlike external costs which have been the subject of extensive work. The committee recognises the role of the 'Polluter Pays Principle' and expects the Commission to develop this pragmatic approach. It recognises the contributions made to date by the various modes of transport in the form of general taxation, vehicle and oil taxes, and road tolls to balance out real infrastructure building and maintenance costs and views this as the starting point for future work.
Members also note the fact that the Commission has not attempted to assess the impact that its proposed method for internalising external costs might have on competition among the various modes of transport and on the costs of mobility and calls on the Commission to do so. They also deplore the fact that the Commission has not proposed measures to mitigate the effects of increased remoteness arising from EU enlargement and has not made any forecasts regarding the consequences of its application, in particular in those Member States with geographical barriers and for those which do not as yet have multimodal alternatives. The Commission should do so as part of the forthcoming review of the trans-European transport networks (TENs).
The committee feels that the Commission is behaving inconsistently on several counts in that it maintains that the internalisation of external costs should also apply to cars, but does not even supply related calculations, preferring instead to maintain the freedom of Member States to charge passenger cars as they see fit. It therefore asks the Commission to publish a methodology for internalising the external costs of individual vehicles in order to provide Member States with guidelines in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.
Lastly, the Commission is asked to produce specific proposals for all modes of transport and to perform the task deriving from the Eurovignette Directive by submitting a comprehensive plan for calculating and charging external costs and assessing their impact on the basis of a comprehensible model.
Rail noise abatement : the Commission is asked to draw up a proposal for a directive with a view to introducing noise-related track access charges for locomotives and wagons in order to provide incentives as quickly as possible for railway undertakings to re-equip their fleets rapidly with low-noise vehicles by replacing brake blocks. If necessary, short-term measures may also be considered and no legislative measure should have a negative impact on the rail sector in intermodal competition.
The report looks to the Commission to provide for a practicable way of ensuring, through earmarking of revenue, that upgrading of this kind will not be confined to wagons belonging to railway undertakings, but will also extend to wagons of other companies carried by railway undertakings.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3244
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0119/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0055/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0055/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.142
- Committee draft report: PE414.008
- Committee draft report: PE414.008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.142
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0055/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3244
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (continuation of debate)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (continuation of debate)
- Georg JARZEMBOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (continuation of debate)
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 The charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Greening of transport and internalisation of external costs (continuation of debate)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
- Johannes BLOKLAND
- Philip BRADBOURN
- Paolo COSTA
- Michael CRAMER
- Christine DE VEYRAC
- Robert EVANS
- Emanuel Jardim FERNANDES
- Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL
- Fiona HALL
- Jeanine HENNIS-PLASSCHAERT
- Krzysztof HOŁOWCZYC
- Wiesław Stefan KUC
- Sepp KUSSTATSCHER
- Eva LICHTENBERGER
- Erik MEIJER
- Alexandru NAZARE
- Seán Ó NEACHTAIN
- Reinhard RACK
- Bilyana Ilieva RAEVA
- Luís QUEIRÓ
- Gilles SAVARY
- Richard SEEBER
- Brian SIMPSON
- Dirk STERCKX
- Ulrich STOCKMANN
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
- Claude TURMES
- Corien WORTMANN-KOOL
Votes
Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 6 #
Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 7 #
Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 3 #
Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - am. 2 #
Rapport JARZEMBOWSKI A6-0055/2009 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
78 |
2008/2240(INI)
2008/11/20
TRAN
78 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas the European Union's objectives are to reduce greenhouse gases by 20%, increase the use of renewable energy sources to 20% and reduce energy consumption by 20%, all by 2020,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Notes that carbon emissions from road transport amount to 72% of total emissions in the transport sector, and Europe must respond to the challenges posed by climate change;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on greening transport as a first tentative partial step towards a more comprehensive approach making for environment-friendlier transport in its many and varied modes
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on greening transport as a
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on greening transport as a first
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that efficient and sustainable mobility
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that mobility greatly benefits personal quality of life, growth and employment in the EU, socio-economic and territorial cohesion, trade with non- EU countries, and the firms and employees involved directly or indirectly in the transport sector and logistics;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that motorised mobility also entails adverse consequences for climate change, oil dependency, the natural environment, and quality of life and health for people, and therefore maintains that
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that, as well as having positive effects and being indispensable for the European Union's economic development and economic and social cohesion, mobility also entails adverse consequences for the natural environment and for people, and therefore maintains that European transport policy – without disregarding the legitimate interests of individuals and industry where mobility is concerned – should continue to aim for greening so as to cancel out, or at any rate reduce, the harmful effects of transport;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that mobility also entails adverse consequences for the natural environment and for people, and therefore maintains that European transport policy – without disregarding the legitimate interests of individuals and industry where mobility is concerned – should continue to aim for greening so as to cancel out, or at any rate reduce, the harmful effects of transport, in line with the Union's objectives on combating global warming up to 2020;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises the need to proceed on the basis of overall costs and to take into account both the positive and negative external effects of transport in the development of Gross Domestic Product;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, as far as greening transport is concerned, the Commission has put forward a number of suggestions aimed at combating climate change,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5.
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Re
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Re
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Regrets that the Commission has failed to produce an integrated plan to green transport, that is to say, every transport sector, and has instead,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point a (a) adopting a piecemeal approach,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point a a)
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point a a)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point b (b)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point b b)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, as far as greening transport is concerned, the Commission has put forward a number of suggestions aimed at combating climate change
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point b b)
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point b (b) again opting for a partial solution, confined its specific proposals for immediate application to higher road tolls for heavy goods vehicles, and even these would apply only in Member States that so wished, and,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point c c) as regards rail noise abatement,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point c c)
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission, therefore, where every mode of transport is concerned, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener, taking into account the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; with reference to those proposals, to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes, as well as their impact on the costs of mobility and competitiveness; and, proceeding from that basis, to submit a master plan for the greening of transport, together with specific legislative proposals;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission, therefore, where every mode of transport is concerned, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener, taking into account the international conventions in force and the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; with reference to those proposals, to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes; and
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission, therefore, where every mode of transport is concerned, to provide for the measures and instruments required to make transport greener, taking into account the measures already implemented in the various transport sectors; with reference to those proposals, to conduct scientifically sound assessments of the impact of the individual measures and their competition implications in terms of modes; and, proceeding from that basis, to submit a
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission, therefore, where every mode of transport is concerned, to provide for the measures and
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to take the TERM-reports of the European Environment Agency (EEA) on 'Environmental Indicators for the Transport Sector' as a basis for the present and future 'greening transport policy';
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the transport sector accounts for around 19% of greenhouse gas emissions, and road transport alone makes up 84% of this figure,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Hopes that international trade agreements take into account the non- tariff components affecting conditions of competition, particularly cross- compliance standards;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Reminds the Commission that it promised to move the signed Transport Protocol of the Alpine Convention on its way to its earliest possible ratification;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that in its communication on the strategy for the internalisation of external costs, the Commission has
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Supports the Commission in putting forward scientifically coherent and equitable justifications for charging for the external costs of each mode of transport based on marginal social cost pricing, in line with the White Paper on Transport of 2001;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is disappointed
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Article 11, third paragraph, of the Eurovignette Directive stipulated back in 2006 that: ‘No later than 10 June 2008, the Commission shall present, after examining all options including environment, noise, congestion and health- related costs, a generally applicable, transparent and comprehensible model for the assessment of all external costs to serve as the basis for future calculations of infrastructure charges. This model shall be accompanied by an impact analysis of the internalisation of external costs for all modes of transport and a strategy for a stepwise implementation of the model for all modes of transport
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Deplores the fact that the Commission has not so much as attempted in its communication to gauge, assess, and describe the impact that its proposed method for internalising external costs might have on competition among the various modes of transport, on the cost of mobility and on competitiveness;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Deplores the fact that the Commission has not so much as attempted in its communication to gauge, assess, and describe the impact that its proposed method for internalising external costs might have on competition among the various modes of transport, and on the costs of mobility and competitiveness;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission when putting forward further proposals to green the transport sector, to include assessments of the impact of competition between transport modes and associated social and environmental impacts, as was done with the proposal to revise the Eurovignette Directive;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Encourages the Commission, to this end, to submit a supplementary proposal for multimodal mobility corridors ('green corridors') as part of the review of the TENs, offsetting the burdens imposed by the present proposal by offering accessibility and mobility without obstacles;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas internalisation must be integrated into a more comprehensive policy to promote co-modality and a sustainable transport system and this policy must also include the promotion of research, funding of infrastructure, opening of markets and standardisation; whereas, nevertheless, these price signals will not in themselves be sufficient to change the behaviour of users unless the necessary alternatives are available to them (cleaner cars, alternative forms of transport, etc.),
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes with astonishment that the Commission is behaving inconsistently on several counts in that, on the one hand, it maintains that the internalisation of external costs should also apply to cars, but does not even supply related calculations, preferring instead to give Member States a completely free choice, and, secondly, it sees an essential need for European legislation enabling external costs to be charged to heavy goods vehicles, but is again leaving enforcement to the Member States’ discretion; therefore asks the Commission to publish a methodology for internalising the external costs of individual vehicles in order to provide the Member States with guidelines in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Re
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission,
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Underlines that the retrofitting of wagons at a reasonable cost presupposes the resolution of the existing technical obstacles as soon as possible and before the adoption of any binding legislative measure;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Underlines that the retrofitting of wagons at a reasonable cost presupposes the resolution of the existing technical obstacles as soon as possible and before the adoption of any binding legislative measure;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Commission has convincingly described the public health nuisance caused by rail noise,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Commission has convincingly described the public health nuisance caused by rail noise
source: PE-415.142
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/2/date |
Old
2009-02-17T00:00:00New
2009-02-16T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.008New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.008 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.142New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.142 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090310&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090310&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-55&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0055_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-119New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0119_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/6/66808New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|