Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana ( S&D) | KUHN Werner ( PPE), JENSEN Anne E. ( ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE), FOSTER Jacqueline ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | GLANTE Norbert ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on transport applications of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (short-and medium-term EU policy) in response to the Commission communication on an Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications.
The resolution welcomes the Commission communication and the series of specific sectoral, regulatory and horizontal actions proposed therein. Parliament agrees with the Commission that a targeted action plan is, at this point, the best option for giving a further impetus to the development and application of EGNOS and Galileo, particularly in the transport field. Members stress that satellite navigation systems should ensure interoperability between different systems (including conventional systems) and should also allow intermodal use in both passenger and freight transport services.
Parliament endorses the view that EGNOS and Galileo can make an important contribution to road traffic management and that an awareness campaign in that sector is required in order to increase the use made of the opportunities it provides in relation to fee collection, eCall , online booking of safe parking sites for trucks, and real-time tracking to contribute to safer and more environmentally friendly road transport.
Regretting that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS, Members call for EGNOS system coverage to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority, so as to enable the system to be used throughout Europe in every transport sector, and stress the importance of ensuring that its coverage extends to both the MEDA countries and the Middle East and Africa.
Of the 15 sectoral actions included in the Action Plan, 9 have an immediate and important transport application. The Commission is called upon to:
ensure swift certification of EGNOS for civil aviation through the competent authorities; bring forward the necessary regulatory proposals to deliver GNSS added value for safety in all forms of transport, particularly on the roads , and to help improve freight transport efficiency; intensify industrial cooperation with non-EU countries with a view to promoting the development and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo applications and services; make a careful appraisal of the need to amend existing legislation on digital tachographs in order to ensure that the opportunities for positioning and speed information offered by GNSS are used appropriately; take steps to increase awareness and improve knowledge of possible GNSS applications in the maritime and inland waterway sectors ; efficiently implement the strong awareness-raising measures set out in the Action Plan, in order to secure the extensive use of EGNOS in Europe; examine what data protection concerns might arise with the use of EGNOS applications and services and to do all it can to dispel these.
The resolution insists that the Commission should propose, in the context of the budgetary procedure and the future multiannual financial framework (MFF), steps to ensure adequate levels of funding for GNSS research and development, as well as for implementation. It renews its call, regarding both this specific project and similar projects, such as the TEN-Ts, for the Commission to submit a multiannual financing proposal going beyond the period of the MFF, in order to provide a stable and reliable financial framework for more ambitious European projects whose scope exceeds the present bounds.
Parliament calls on the Commission to inform Parliament how the annual maintenance cost, estimated at EUR 800 million, will be financed once Galileo has become operational.
The Commission is also invited to come forward with a comprehensive funding strategy which in addition to adequate EU and Member State contributions, could include, inter alia, coordinated tax incentives, simplified grant application procedures, and arrangements that could channel venture capital to SMEs and facilitate the development and marketing of EGNOS and Galileo applications, in cooperation with the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund.
Lastly, the resolution regrets that the shortage of funds allocated to research and innovation for applications based on EGNOS or Galileo is considerably delaying technological progress and the growth of industrial capacity, as well as environmentally effective implementation, in the European Union. It therefore urges the Commission to introduce arrangements enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to gain access to funding more readily .
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Silvia-AdrianaŢICĂU (S&D, RO) in response to the Commission communication on an Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications.
It welcomes the Commission communication and the series of specific sectoral, regulatory and horizontal actions proposed therein. It agrees with the Commission that a targeted action plan is, at this point, the best option for giving a further impetus to the development and application of EGNOS and Galileo, particularly in the transport field. The committee stresses that satellite navigation systems should ensure interoperability between different systems (including conventional systems) and should also allow intermodal use in both passenger and freight transport services.
Regretting that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS, Members call for EGNOS system coverage to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority, so as to enable the system to be used throughout Europe in every transport sector, and stress the importance of ensuring that its coverage extends to both the MEDA countries and the Middle East and Africa.
Of the 15 sectoral actions included in the Action Plan, 9 have an immediate and important transport application. The Commission is called upon to:
ensure swift certification of EGNOS for civil aviation through the competent authorities; bring forward the necessary regulatory proposals to deliver GNSS added value for safety in all forms of transport, particularly on the roads , and to help improve freight transport efficiency; intensify industrial cooperation with non-EU countries with a view to promoting the development and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo applications and services; make a careful appraisal of the need to amend existing legislation on digital tachographs in order to ensure that the opportunities for positioning and speed information offered by GNSS are used appropriately; take steps to increase awareness and improve knowledge of possible GNSS applications in the maritime and inland waterway sectors ; efficiently implement the strong awareness-raising measures set out in the Action Plan, in order to secure the extensive use of EGNOS in Europe; examine what data protection concerns might arise with the use of EGNOS applications and services and to do all it can to dispel these.
The report insists that the Commission should propose, in the context of the budgetary procedure and the future multiannual financial framework (MFF), steps to ensure adequate levels of funding for GNSS research and development, as well as for implementation. It renews its call, regarding both this specific project and similar projects, such as the TEN-Ts, for the Commission to submit a multiannual financing proposal going beyond the period of the MFF, in order to provide a stable and reliable financial framework for more ambitious European projects whose scope exceeds the present bounds.
The committee also calls on the Commission to come forward with a comprehensive funding strategy which in addition to adequate EU and Member State contributions, could include, inter alia, coordinated tax incentives, simplified grant application procedures, and arrangements that could channel venture capital to SMEs and facilitate the development and marketing of EGNOS and Galileo applications, in cooperation with the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund.
Lastly, the report regrets that the shortage of funds allocated to research and innovation for applications based on EGNOS or Galileo is considerably delaying technological progress and the growth of industrial capacity, as well as environmentally effective implementation, in the European Union. It therefore urges the Commission to introduce arrangements enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to gain access to funding more readily .
PURPOSE: to present an Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications.
CONTENT: EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service), the European satellite-based augmentation system that paves the way for GALILEO, has been in service since 1 October 2009. Six months before, on behalf of the EU, the Commission took over from the European Space Agency (ESA) ownership of the system. With its three geostationary satellites and 40 ground stations spread over Europe and North Africa, EGNOS supplements the Global Positioning System (GPS), to which the US provided access for civilian use, with no guarantee of service, back in 2000. EGNOS offers free enhanced satellite navigation signals over Europe which are ten times more precise than GPS . All application domains which use positioning and velocity information can benefit from this improved accuracy: all transport modes through the management of infrastructure and the provision of geo-localised information, logistics, precision agriculture, civil protection and emergency management, mapping and land registry, fisheries, energy, management of natural resources, mining, Earth sciences, meteorology, the modelling of climate change, environment, justice and law enforcement, border control, etc.
Another advantage EGNOS can offer civilian users is integrity, i.e. a measure of the trust which can be placed in the correctness of the information supplied by the system, with the user being automatically alerted whenever an error made by the system is beyond a certain confidence limit. Integrity plays an important role in Safety of Life applications in transport (all modes of transport, airport management, automatic vehicles), sensitive commercial applications (high-precision oil platform location, logistics, transport of dangerous goods), or liability-critical applications needing legal recourse (reconstruction of road accidents, road user charging, synchronisation of electrical or telecommunication networks).
Together with the GPS signal, EGNOS today, and later GALILEO, strengthens the infrastructure leading to a global market for GNSS products and services, called downstream GNSS applications. In 2008, this was worth EUR 124 billion. The market is founded primarily on basic positioning and timing signals, but is expected to benefit from the planned introduction of authentication and encryption of signals. Experts predict that, in volume, 75 % (52% in revenues) of this market will come from products and services linked to mobile telecommunications and personal handsets, with a further 20 % (44% in revenues) from intelligent transport systems for road and the remaining 5 % (4% in revenues)from other domains of application.
Despite Europe’s investment in its GNSS infrastructure and the availability of EGNOS, European industry has only a low share of the global GNSS applications market compared with what it is capable of achieving in other sectors of high-technology (a good third). This is a problem since:
applications based on EGNOS and subsequently on GALILEO would make a decisive contribution to the development of a knowledge-based society and the creation of high value jobs in the EU. Europe will therefore be missing a huge opportunity if it does not take an appropriate share of the economic benefit expected from GNSS applications. Also, if GALILEO and EGNOS do not become the underlying GNSS standard in Europe, many application domains may remain shackled with technologies which prevent them from benefiting from the added-value of new advanced services; the limited use of applications based on EGNOS and GALILEO leads to critical dependencies as GNSS are very pervasive, providing vital position, navigation, and timing information for a whole range of daily-life activities and for Europe’s security and social and economic development. By relying only on GPS-based applications, the EU would be exposed to the potential non-availability of the GPS signal , which is beyond the EU's control since its primary objective is to support the military operations of a third country. In the same way as the Internet, the pervasiveness of GNSS services is huge.
The most recent and conservative estimates of the overall benefits of EU GNSS programmes to EU industry, citizens and Member States are put at between EUR55 and EUR 63 billion over the next 20 years, with most important benefits arising from indirect revenues in the downstream industry (between EUR 37 billion and EUR 45 billion). As a consequence, the low uptake of applications based on EU GNSS is a problem that affects European society in general, and in many ways.
A detailed action plan is called for, to boost people's confidence in the programmes, to foster the development of EGNOS and GALILEO downstream applications, and to achieve the quickest, deepest, broadest development of applications across all domains so to reap maximum benefit from the EU’s infrastructure.
The Commission believes that European industry should reap maximum benefit from the investment made in the programmes. Coordinated action by the European Commission among Member States will draw as much attention as possible to the necessity of investment in research, ensure the widest possible dissemination of vital information and optimise awareness raising activities. This will avoid a conflict of standards and a duplication of efforts if undertaken by individual Member States.
Main action points
Through the 24 actions points listed in the plan, the Commission will co-ordinate activities in this domain. This process has led to focusing the action plan, for the period up to 2013, on the following domains in particular to take advantage of the improved accuracy of EGNOS: applications for individual handsets and mobile phones; road transport; aviation; maritime transport and fisheries; precision agriculture and environment protection; civil protection and surveillance.
Among other things, the Commission will:
allocate EUR 38 million worth of FP7 funding to a broad spectrum of research proposals on GNSS application in 2011; seek certification of EGNOS for aviation including Safety of Life; in conjunction with Eurocontrol target aircraft manufacturers, general aviation and small airports; investigate possibilities for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and seek certification of Galileo for Intelligent Transport Systems while also targeting the road transport community; promote Galileo and EGNOS-enabled chips and handsets; establish an International EGNOS & Galileo Application Forum where users, developers, infrastructure managers and systems providers can exchange views on feeding into the evolution of the GNSS project.
The focus of the GNSS Applications Action Plan is from 2010-2013 – though objectives extend beyond 2020. It clearly underpins official Commission priorities as laid out in the EU2020 Strategy and the EU flagship initiative 'An industrial policy for the globalisation era'.
The Commission also emphasises the need for further EU R&D funding for GNSS applications in order to foster the development of applications based on EGNOS and Galileo, thereby ensuring Europe's independence from foreign, military-controlled systems.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)8071/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0250/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0084/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0084/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE458.490
- Committee opinion: PE452.612
- Committee draft report: PE454.505
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0308
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0308 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE454.505
- Committee opinion: PE452.612
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE458.490
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0084/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)8071/2
Amendments | Dossier |
60 |
2010/2208(INI)
2010/12/15
ITRE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas satellite navigation technology
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and the GSA to approach local and regional authorities and SMEs not dealing with space-related technology as potential end-users of GNSS applications, using appropriate calls for tenders, awareness campaigns and technology transfer mechanisms, while stressing simultaneously the importance of maintaining regional balance;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and the GSA to approach both local and regional authorities and SMEs
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to consider further EU R&D funding for GNSS applications to foster the development of applications based on EGNOS and Galileo, and to ensure Europe's independence from foreign, military- controlled systems;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B a (new) Ba. whereas satellite navigation technology should be synchronised in all transport modes to maintain proper co- modality for example in logistic centres to assure proper freight of goods;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines that GNSS represents part of the core of EU2020 strategy in terms of innovation, assisting in the delivery of a greener and a more connected economy and growth, as well as in climate change and sustainable mobility;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Mentions that GNSSs - like the internet - are more a service enabler than just a standalone service. It acts as a catalyst for economic activities, leading to the creation of added value and jobs in a wide range of connected sectors (upstream and downstream markets) and at macroeconomic level through socio- economic benefits for society as a whole;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Points out that the size of the GNSS downstream market in the EU is estimated at EUR 17 billion in 2010, taking into account revenues from companies directly involved in satellite navigation i.e., receiver manufacturers, navigation software developers, etc.;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Underlines that an average of 15 million EURO per year for research and development of applications and GNSS services is insufficient and calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure a significant increase of this amount, in order to provide the necessary resources for the GNSS development;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that stability, predictability and transparency are of utmost importance for the development of applications when introducing the GNSS programme; believes that efficiency, compatibility and interoperability are essential features for a functioning system and applications;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls in this context for improved internal coordination in the development of EGNOS and Galileo system, needed to secure the development of an efficient EU system; Calls also for external coordination and cooperation with other systems (such as GPS, Glonass), both in terms of infrastructure use and development of applications, in order to identify win-win effects and ensure appropriate compatibility and interoperability;
source: PE-454.605
2011/02/09
TRAN
48 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the communication of 16 October 2010 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union (COM(2010)546),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the development of GNSS applications and services is essential to ensure that the infrastructure investment which GALILEO represents is fully exploited and that the GALILEO system is developed to its full capacity,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas investment in this sector has implications for all EU policies; whereas its expansion and implementation will have a direct impact on the realisation of the EU 2020 Strategy and from the point of view of developing the potential of the European market in GNSS applications and services so as to create jobs and enhance Europe’s competitiveness,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the GNSS and Galileo projects bring considerable added value to European industrial policy and it is essential to ensure their success,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that a targeted action plan is, at this point, the best option for giving a further impetus to the development and application of EGNOS, particularly in the transport field; underlines that Satellite Navigation Systems should integrate interoperability between different - including conventional - systems, and should furthermore include intermodal use for both passengers and freight transport services;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Agrees with the Commission that a targeted action plan is, at this point, the best option for giving a further impetus to the development and application of EGNOS and Galileo, particularly in the transport field;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to ensure swift certification of EGNOS for civil aviation through the competent authority EASA;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees that an action to promote the use of EGNOS and Galileo in civil aviation is a strategic requirement for the implementation of a Single European Sky, especially as regards its use for landing procedures and at small airports;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees that
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS and calls for the EGNOS system to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority and for consideration to be given to its possible extension into Africa;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS and calls for the EGNOS system to be extended to the southern, eastern and south-eastern
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the Commission report of 18 January 2011 to the European Parliament and the Council, constituting the mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (COM(2011)0005), which maintains that substantial funding is needed in order to complete the satellite radio navigation infrastructure,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS and calls for the EGNOS system to be extended to southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe as a matter of priority so as to enable it to be used throughout Europe in every transport sector;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that all of the European Union is not at this time covered by EGNOS and
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the importance of GNSS in developing Intelligent Transport Systems; reminds that ITS can create more efficient, cleaner and more safe transport solutions, and a proper implementation of a number of ITS services requires well functioning GNSS;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the view that EGNOS can make an important contribution to road traffic management and that an awareness campaign in that sector is required in order to increase the use made of the opportunities it provides in relation to fee collection, eCall, online booking of safe parking sites for trucks, and real-time tracking to contribute to safer and more
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the view that EGNOS and Galileo can make an important contribution to road traffic management and that an awareness campaign in that sector is required in order to increase the use made of the opportunities it provides in relation to fee collection, eCall and real- time tracking to contribute to safer and more environmentally friendly road transport;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls therefore on the Commission to bring forward the necessary regulatory proposals to deliver GNSS added value for
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission to intensify industrial cooperation with non-EU countries with a view to promoting the development and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo applications and services;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Agrees that the Commission should take steps to increase awareness and improve knowledge of possible GNSS applications in the maritime and inland waterway sectors and to have EGNOS-based applications accepted at IMO and ICAO levels;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Agrees that GNSS can do much to enhance the safety and efficiency of shipping and that the Commission should take steps to increase awareness of possible
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas transport applications account for 20% of all GNSS applications by volume and 44% by value and whereas safety operations – mostly related to transport – account for a further 5%,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Supports the Commission’s intention of launching campaigns to raise awareness among the various stakeholders so as to give European industry the confidence to invest in the commercial potential of the EU’s satellite navigation projects;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to efficiently implement the strong awareness campaign measures stated in the Action Plan, in order to achieve the extensive use of EGNOS in Europe in all application areas hence ensuring more complex approaches;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Insists that the Commission should propose, in the context of the budgetary procedure and the future multiannual financial framework, ensuring adequate levels of funding for GNSS research and development, as well as for implementation; underlines that EU funding in the transport sector is already sparse, therefore additional funding for GNSS should not result in cutting other priorities in the Common Transport Policy area;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Insists that the Commission should propose, in the context of the budgetary procedure and the future multiannual financial framework, ensuring adequate levels of funding for GNSS research and development, as well as for implementation;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to consider whether revenue from commercial Galileo activities might be assigned to the EU budget;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls on the Commission to inform Parliament how the annual maintenance cost, estimated at EUR 800 million, will be financed once Galileo has become operational;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to come forward with a comprehensive funding strategy which in addition to adequate EU and Member State contributions could include, inter alia, co-ordinated tax incentives, simplified grant application procedures, and arrangements that could channel venture capital to SMEs and facilitate the development and marketing of EGNOS and Galileo applications, in co-operation with the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that € 100 m likely to be underspent in payment appropriations for research within the Seventh Framework Programme be made available for the development of GNSS applications;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to examine how simplified procedures might ensure more efficient disbursement of this funding in support of research in the field of GNSS- enabled transport
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to examine how simplified procedures might ensure more efficient disbursement of this funding in support of research in the field of accessible transport f
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas EGNOS is a self-contained system to supplement GPS that has to have GPS signals in order to perform calculation and correction operations and is therefore dependent on them; whereas there will be no completely independent GNSS until Galileo has been deployed,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to examine how simplified procedures might ensure more efficient disbursement of this funding in support of research in the transport field, focusing in particular on SMEs;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to examine how simplified procedures might ensure more efficient and transparent disbursement of this funding in support of research in the transport field;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to help SMEs gain access more easily to European funding aimed at encouraging innovation related to GNSS applications, especially under FP7 and FP8;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point a (new) Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes the need for investment in research into GNSS-specific applications and services
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Also calls on the Commission, therefore, to encourage initiatives aimed at developing sector-specific service centres, in particular for the maritime sector;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Regrets that the shortage of funds allocated to research and innovation for applications based on EGNOS or Galileo is considerably delaying technological progress and the growth of industrial capacity in European Union;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Regrets that the shortage of funds allocated to research and innovation for applications based on EGNOS or Galileo is delaying technological progress
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Regrets that the shortage of funds allocated to research and innovation for
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Europe
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Europe’s EGNOS system is designed to meet
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the commercial transport applications of
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the commercial transport applications of EGNOS and Galileo represent a growing global market which should be secured as far as is possible for the economic benefit of European business,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas GNSS will play a vital role in supporting and promoting the use of Intelligent Transport Systems,
source: PE-458.490
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19846&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0308/COM_COM(2010)0308_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0308/COM_COM(2010)0308_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.505New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-454505_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.612&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-452612_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.490New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-458490_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0084_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0084_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-84&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0084_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-84&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0084_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-250New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0250_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/03822New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŢICĂU Silvia-AdrianaNew
ȚICĂU Silvia-Adriana |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|