BETA


Events

2019/03/11
   Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/09/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/09/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/09/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 464 votes to 69, with 17 abstentions, a resolution on dual quality of products in the single market.

The shortcomings of dual quality of products : although the brand name, packaging design and marketing look at a first glance are the same, several researches conducted in different Member States have revealed in the EU Single Market products, which have clearly different compositions from the point of view of the recipe, the basic raw material used or its share in the product, all this depending on the country of their purchase.

Cases of such significant differences concern not only food products but frequently also non-food products, including detergents, cosmetics, toiletries and products intended for babies. Consumers are concerned about such differences.

Parliament underlined that any such kind of discrimination is unacceptable and that all EU consumers should enjoy access to the same level of product quality.

Members welcomed the Commission's recent announcement of initiatives to address this issue , including the commitment to delivering a common testing methodology, to allocate a budget for its preparation and enforcement and for the collection of further reliable and comparable evidence, and to updating Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices. They encouraged Member States and their competent authorities to actively participate in ongoing initiatives , including the development and integration into their working practices of a common testing methodology and the collection of further evidence.

Commission notice : Parliament took note of the Commission notice on the application of EU food and consumer protection law to issues of dual quality of products. It shared the Commission opinion that in the single market, where

consumers have a general understanding of the principles of free circulation and equal access to goods, they do not, a priori , expect branded products sold in different countries to be differentiated.

Members are not proposing to standardise the products circulating within the single market or to prescribe manufacturers to change the compositions of their products or to determine the exact composition of the individual products.

However, they consider that the quality of products should not diverge when offered to consumers on different markets and that consumer preferences should not be used as an excuse to lower quality or offer different quality grades on different markets.

The resolution therefore emphasised the importance of informing consumers in a precise and transparent manner that the product they buy or know of from another Member State is different in order to avoid misleading them and distorting the impression given by the purchase product.

Recommendation and further steps : Members stated that the issue of double quality standards required an EU-wide solution via directly enforceable measures. They emphasised the importance of a public debate to raise consumer awareness of products and their characteristics and highlighted the role of industry in improving transparency and clarity in the composition and quality of products and any changes made to them. They welcomed the Commission's initiative to develop a code of conduct in this regard.

Parliament welcomed the Commission's proposal on the New Deal for Consumers , which seeks to tackle dual quality of products by amending Article 6 of Directive 2005/29/EC to designate as a misleading commercial practice the marketing of a product as being identical to the same product marketed in several other Member States, when those products have a different composition or characteristics. They noted, however, that the proposal also contains some unclear provisions that require clarification in order to ensure proper interpretation and application.

Members remained convinced that an amendment to Annex I of the Directive introducing another item onto the ‘ blacklist ’ defining the practices prohibited in all circumstances that explicitly mentions dual quality of identically branded products when discriminatory and not respecting consumer expectations would address unjustified cases of dual quality in the most effective way. The legislative process should provide a clear definition of what can be considered dual quality.

Lastly, Parliament invited manufacturers to consider placing a logo on their packaging to indicate that the content and quality of a product of the same brand are the same in all Member States in order to allow European consumers to have access to products of the same quality throughout the single market.

Documents
2018/09/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/07/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Olga SEHNALOVÁ (S&D, CZ) on dual quality of products in the single market.

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee in accordance with Article 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave its opinion on the report.

The shortcomings of dual quality of products : although the brand name, packaging design and marketing look at a first glance are the same, several researches conducted in different Member States have revealed in the EU Single Market products, which have clearly different compositions from the point of view of the recipe, the basic raw material used or its share in the product, all this depending on the country of their purchase.

Cases of such significant differences concern not only food products but frequently also non-food products, including detergents, cosmetics, toiletries and products intended for babies.

Members underlined that any such kind of discrimination is unacceptable and that all EU consumers should enjoy access to the same level of product quality.

The report welcomed the Commission's recent announcement of initiatives to address this issue , including the commitment to delivering a common testing methodology, to allocate a budget for its preparation and enforcement and for the collection of further reliable and comparable evidence, and to updating Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices. It took note of the mandate given by the European Council to the High Level Forum on Better Functioning Food Supply Chain in order to address the issue of dual quality. It also welcomed the adoption by Parliament of a pilot project for 2018 providing for a series of market investigations into several categories of consumer products in order to assess the different aspects of the dual quality.

Commission notice : the report took note of the Commission notice on the application of EU food and consumer protection law to issues of dual quality of products. Members shared the Commission opinion that in the single market, where consumers have a general understanding of the principles of free circulation and equal access to goods, they do not, a priori , expect branded products sold in different countries to be differentiated.

Members are not proposing to standardise the products circulating within the single market or to prescribe manufacturers to change the compositions of their products or to determine the exact composition of the individual products. Moreover, they are also aware that there may be objective factors that affect the resulting compositions of products. However, they considered it essential to provide consumers with accurate and easy-to-understand information to consumers is key to tackling dual quality of products. Consumer preferences should not be used as an excuse to lower quality or offer different quality grades on different markets.

The report therefore emphasised the importance of informing consumers in a precise and transparent manner that the product they buy or know of from another Member State is different in order to avoid misleading them and distorting the impression given by the purchase product.

Recommendation and further steps : Members drew attention to the fact that the issue of dual quality is directly related to the principles of the functioning of the single market and consumer confidence, both of which are at stake, and therefore requires, in particular, an EU-wide solution , in the form of enforcement measures.

The report emphasised the importance of a public debate to raise consumer awareness of products and their characteristics. They highlighted the role of industry in improving transparency and clarity in the composition and quality of products and any changes made to them. They welcomed the Commission's initiative to develop a code of conduct in this regard.

Members welcomed the Commission's proposal on the New Deal for Consumers , which seeks to tackle dual quality of products by amending Article 6 of Directive 2005/29/EC to designate as a misleading commercial practice the marketing of a product as being identical to the same product marketed in several other Member States, when those products have a different composition or characteristics. They noted, however, that the proposal also contains some unclear provisions that require clarification in order to ensure proper interpretation and application.

The legislative process should provide a clear definition of what can be considered dual quality and specify how each case should be assessed and handled by the competent authorities.

Members recalled that Member States are responsible for the application of Directive 2005/29/EC and should ensure that this is done to ensure that consumers are not misled by unfair commercial practices.

Documents
2018/07/12
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2018/06/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/05/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/04/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/02/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2018/01/18
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2017/11/22
   EP - NEKOV Momchil (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2017/11/21
   EP - BORZAN Biljana (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2017/10/11
   EP - SEHNALOVÁ Olga (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová - Am 1 13/09/2018 12:33:57.000

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 305, -: 279, 0: 20
BG SE ES RO IT HR DE PT AT EL HU LV BE IE MT CY CZ ?? DK SI SK LU EE FI LT GB FR PL NL
Total
14
18
45
21
56
10
75
18
17
11
13
6
18
7
5
3
16
2
11
7
10
6
6
11
9
56
66
44
23
icon: S&D S&D
158

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Sweden ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
54

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
172

Croatia PPE

4

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Ireland PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová - § 37 13/09/2018 12:34:09.000

2018/09/13 Outcome: -: 340, +: 248, 0: 4
IT RO AT SE HR BG IE CY ?? LV MT EL SK HU LU EE FI DE PT DK CZ SI LT BE NL GB ES FR PL
Total
54
22
17
16
10
14
7
3
2
6
4
10
10
12
6
6
11
75
17
11
16
6
9
18
23
55
46
62
44
icon: S&D S&D
150

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
17

NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
31
3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
55

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
172

Croatia PPE

For (1)

4

Ireland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

3

Malta PPE

2

Greece PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová - § 42 13/09/2018 12:34:20.000

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 347, -: 223, 0: 36
PL BE SE RO CZ BG PT AT GB DE HR IT LT IE DK LV FI EE SI MT CY LU SK ?? NL EL ES HU FR
Total
44
18
17
22
16
14
19
17
56
75
10
58
9
7
11
6
11
6
7
5
3
6
10
2
23
11
46
12
65
icon: S&D S&D
159

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Sweden ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

3

Germany NI

2

NI

2

Hungary NI

3

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
33
2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: PPE PPE
173

Belgium PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

For (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

3

Ireland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

3

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

4

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová - Considérant E/2 13/09/2018 12:34:36.000

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 310, -: 279, 0: 4
IT SE ES PT RO AT LV HR PL HU BG BE IE MT CY SK DK EL CZ ?? DE LU EE FI LT SI GB FR NL
Total
56
15
46
19
21
17
6
10
44
12
14
18
7
5
1
10
10
8
16
1
76
6
6
11
9
7
54
66
22
icon: S&D S&D
155

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
3

Greece S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33
3
2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
53

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
167

Sweden PPE

1

Croatia PPE

For (1)

4

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

Ireland PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová - Résolution 13/09/2018 12:35:15.000

2018/09/13 Outcome: +: 464, -: 69, 0: 17
DE IT ES PL FR RO PT BE AT SE CZ BG HU HR SK NL LT IE FI SI LU MT LV EE EL DK ?? GB
Total
69
50
40
40
63
21
19
18
16
14
15
14
12
10
10
20
7
7
9
7
5
5
5
3
8
9
1
53
icon: PPE PPE
156

Sweden PPE

1

Ireland PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
143

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
51
3

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Czechia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
3

Netherlands ENF

2
AmendmentsDossier
448 2018/2008(INI)
2018/03/02 AGRI 115 amendments...
source: 618.354
2018/04/18 IMCO 199 amendments...