BETA


2018/2262(INI) Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Recommendation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (icon: S&D S&D) ZOVKO Željana (icon: PPE PPE), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR), VEHKAPERÄ Mirja (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CHAUPRADE Aymeric (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion IMCO SCHWAB Andreas (icon: PPE PPE) Jiří MAŠTÁLKA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Richard SULÍK (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion INTA BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD) Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE), Joachim STARBATTY (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 114

Events

2019/03/26
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/03/26
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 132, with 81 abstentions, a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation.

Background

According to Eurostat data, in 2017 Switzerland was the EU’s third-biggest partner in terms of export of goods and its fourth biggest in terms of import of goods. Switzerland is part of the Schengen area. It is a member of the European Environment Agency; it participates in the EU's Horizon 2020 Research Framework Programme and has ratified its participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS.

On 28 September 2018, the Federal Council approved Switzerland's second contribution to a number of EU Member States, amounting to CHF 1.3 billion over ten years, and is now awaiting a positive decision from the Federal Assembly.

Switzerland’s current relationship with the EU is based on a complex set of some 20 main sectoral bilateral agreements and around 100 other agreements; whereas Switzerland only partially participates in all four freedoms. The Council stated that an overarching institutional agreement with Switzerland should aim to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators.

For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the EU that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system.

A close partnership

Parliament stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner.

Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism.

Securing an Interinstitutional Framework Agreement (IFA) with Switzerland is of great importance, since it would guarantee legal certainty for both Switzerland and the EU, dynamic incorporation of the EU acquis, enhanced access to the internal market for Switzerland to the benefit of both sides, and the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the event of unresolved disputes relating to the application or interpretation of the IFA.

Parliament welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. It asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement.

Free movement of persons

Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers.

However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons.

Switzerland's contribution to European programmes

Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway.

Public procurement and services

Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism.

Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision.

Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice.

The Parliament welcomed Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European agenda on migration. It welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.

Documents
2019/03/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/03/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted a report by Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ (S&D, RO) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation.

The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee, also expressed its opinion.

The Council stated that the objective of a comprehensive institutional agreement with Switzerland should be to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators. For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the Union that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system.

A close partnership

Members stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner.

Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism. They welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. They asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement.

Free movement of persons

Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers.

However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons.

Switzerland's contribution to European programmes

Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway.

Public procurement and services

Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism.

Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision.

Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice.

The report also welcomed:

- Switzerland's role as a facilitator in implementing complex federal structures and peace-brokered, constitutional arrangements, in order to ease the coexistence of different ethnic backgrounds;

- Switzerland's participation in and support for EU security and defence missions, such as EUFOR, ALTHEA, EULEX Kosovo, EUTM Mali and EUBAM Libya, and the work of the European Defence Agency;

- Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration.

Members welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and called for continued cooperation in future research programmes. They invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.

Documents
2019/02/20
   EP - Vote in committee
2019/02/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2019/01/31
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2019/01/10
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/12/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/12/06
   EP - SCHWAB Andreas (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2018/11/19
   EP - BEGHIN Tiziana (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2018/11/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/11/15
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2018/11/05
   EP - FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 1 26/03/2019 13:27:16.000 #

2019/03/26 Outcome: -: 443, +: 190, 0: 15
CY IE LU EL GB HR LV LT EE IT HU SI MT PL FI SK BE DK CZ PT SE AT FR BG NL RO ES DE
Total
1
8
4
9
60
8
8
8
5
65
13
8
6
47
13
13
20
12
20
20
18
16
66
16
25
22
47
89
icon: ECR ECR
66

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ECR

For (1)

3

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
4
icon: S&D S&D
157

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
192

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 3 26/03/2019 13:27:31.000 #

2019/03/26 Outcome: -: 352, +: 264, 0: 30
IT DK AT DE PT ES CY LU IE EL MT EE GB SE HR FI BE LT SI LV SK HU CZ RO BG NL FR PL
Total
65
11
16
88
20
47
1
4
8
9
6
4
60
18
9
12
19
8
8
8
13
13
20
22
16
25
68
47
icon: S&D S&D
157

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
31
3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Denmark ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
192

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Recommandation 26/03/2019 13:28:22.000 #

2019/03/26 Outcome: +: 393, -: 132, 0: 81
PL GB IT RO ES BG BE CZ PT SE NL SK FI HR LT DE SI HU MT LV EE IE DK LU EL AT CY FR
Total
43
56
64
22
42
15
17
18
19
16
23
12
13
8
8
82
7
10
6
7
4
8
11
4
8
16
1
65
icon: PPE PPE
176

United Kingdom PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
3

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Greece PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
150

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

Against (1)

3

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

3

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Belgium ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Germany ECR

For (1)

4

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
5
icon: ENF ENF
28

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 1 #

2019/03/26 Outcome: -: 443, +: 190, 0: 15
CY IE LU EL GB HR LV LT EE IT HU SI MT PL FI SK BE DK CZ PT SE AT FR BG NL RO ES DE
Total
1
8
4
9
60
8
8
8
5
65
13
8
6
47
13
13
20
12
20
20
18
16
67
16
25
22
47
89
icon: ECR ECR
66

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ECR

For (1)

3

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
32

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
4
icon: S&D S&D
157

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
192

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 3 #

2019/03/26 Outcome: -: 352, +: 264, 0: 30
IT DK AT DE PT ES CY LU IE EL MT EE GB SE HR FI BE LT SI LV SK HU CZ RO BG NL FR PL
Total
65
11
16
88
20
47
1
4
8
9
6
4
60
18
9
12
19
8
8
8
13
13
20
22
16
25
69
47
icon: S&D S&D
157

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
32
3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Denmark ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
192

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

3

A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Recommandation #

2019/03/26 Outcome: +: 393, -: 132, 0: 81
PL GB IT RO ES BG BE CZ PT SE NL SK FI HR LT DE SI HU MT LV EE IE DK LU EL AT CY FR
Total
43
56
64
22
42
15
17
18
19
16
23
12
13
8
8
82
7
10
6
7
4
8
11
4
8
16
1
66
icon: PPE PPE
176

United Kingdom PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
3

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Greece PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
150

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

Against (1)

3

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

3

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Belgium ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Germany ECR

For (1)

4

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3
5
icon: ENF ENF
29

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (2)

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
114 2018/2262(INI)
2019/01/10 AFET 76 amendments...
source: 632.825
2019/01/28 INTA 38 amendments...
source: 634.550

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-630430_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-632825_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-632768_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-630624_EN.html
committees/0/shadows/1/name
Old
TANNOCK Charles
New
TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.430
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.825
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.768&secondRef=02
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.624&secondRef=03
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2019-03-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0147_EN.html title: A8-0147/2019
summary
events/3
date
2019-03-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0147_EN.html title: A8-0147/2019
summary
events/4
date
2019-03-26T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32339&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2019-03-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0241_EN.html title: T8-0241/2019
summary
events/5
date
2019-03-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0241_EN.html title: T8-0241/2019
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0147&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0147_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0241
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0241_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-11-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2018-12-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
activities
  • date: 2018-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VEHKAPERÄ Mirja responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: MOSCOVICI Pierre
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-11-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2018-11-19T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2018-12-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs
  • date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.430 title: PE630.430 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.825 title: PE632.825 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.768&secondRef=02 title: PE632.768 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.624&secondRef=03 title: PE630.624 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2018-11-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-15T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2019-03-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0147&language=EN title: A8-0147/2019 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted a report by Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ (S&D, RO) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee, also expressed its opinion. The Council stated that the objective of a comprehensive institutional agreement with Switzerland should be to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators. For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the Union that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system. A close partnership Members stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner. Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism. They welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. They asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement. Free movement of persons Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers. However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons. Switzerland's contribution to European programmes Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway. Public procurement and services Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision. Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice. The report also welcomed: - Switzerland's role as a facilitator in implementing complex federal structures and peace-brokered, constitutional arrangements, in order to ease the coexistence of different ethnic backgrounds; - Switzerland's participation in and support for EU security and defence missions, such as EUFOR, ALTHEA, EULEX Kosovo, EUTM Mali and EUBAM Libya, and the work of the European Defence Agency; - Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration. Members welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and called for continued cooperation in future research programmes. They invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.
  • date: 2019-03-26T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0241 title: T8-0241/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 132, with 81 abstentions, a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Background According to Eurostat data, in 2017 Switzerland was the EU’s third-biggest partner in terms of export of goods and its fourth biggest in terms of import of goods. Switzerland is part of the Schengen area. It is a member of the European Environment Agency; it participates in the EU's Horizon 2020 Research Framework Programme and has ratified its participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS. On 28 September 2018, the Federal Council approved Switzerland's second contribution to a number of EU Member States, amounting to CHF 1.3 billion over ten years, and is now awaiting a positive decision from the Federal Assembly. Switzerland’s current relationship with the EU is based on a complex set of some 20 main sectoral bilateral agreements and around 100 other agreements; whereas Switzerland only partially participates in all four freedoms. The Council stated that an overarching institutional agreement with Switzerland should aim to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators. For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the EU that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system. A close partnership Parliament stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner. Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism. Securing an Interinstitutional Framework Agreement (IFA) with Switzerland is of great importance, since it would guarantee legal certainty for both Switzerland and the EU, dynamic incorporation of the EU acquis, enhanced access to the internal market for Switzerland to the benefit of both sides, and the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the event of unresolved disputes relating to the application or interpretation of the IFA. Parliament welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. It asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement. Free movement of persons Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers. However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons. Switzerland's contribution to European programmes Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway. Public procurement and services Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision. Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice. The Parliament welcomed Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European agenda on migration. It welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.
  • date: 2019-03-26T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/14791
    New
    • AFET/8/14791
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 114
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 108
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    • 6.40.02 Relations with central and eastern Europe
    New
    6.20.03
    Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    6.40.02
    Relations with central and eastern Europe
    procedure/title
    Old
    Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Recommendation
    New
    Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Recommendation
    activities/0/committees/1/date
    2018-11-19T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
    committees/1/date
    2018-11-19T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
    activities
    • date: 2018-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VEHKAPERÄ Mirja responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) committee: INTA
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VEHKAPERÄ Mirja responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/14791
      geographical_area
      Switzerland
      reference
      2018/2262(INI)
      title
      Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Recommendation
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure EP 108
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject