Activities of Giommaria UGGIAS
Plenary speeches (111)
Implementation of the Single European Sky (A7-0095/2014 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Package travel and assisted travel arrangements (A7-0124/2014 - Hans-Peter Mayer)
Roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers (A7-0210/2013 - Werner Kuhn)
Deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall (A7-0482/2013 - Philippe De Backer)
Normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings (A7-0472/2013 - Jaromír Kohlíček)
Occurrence reporting in civil aviation (A7-0317/2013 - Christine De Veyrac)
Freezing and confiscation of proceeds of crime (A7-0178/2013 - Monica Luisa Macovei)
European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (A7-0158/2013 - Michèle Striffler)
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (A7-0183/2013 - Emer Costello)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects (A7-0091/2014 - Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto)
Domestic passenger transport services by rail - Normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings - European Union Agency for Railways - Single European railway area - Railway safety - Interoperability of the rail system (continuation of debate)
Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights (A7-0020/2014 - Georges Bach)
Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights (A7-0020/2014 - Georges Bach)
Implementation of Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (A7-0474/2013 - Robert Rochefort)
Local and regional consequences of the development of smart grids (A7-0019/2014 - Elisabeth Schroedter)
Honey (A7-0440/2013 - Julie Girling)
Smart specialisation: networking excellence for a sound Cohesion Policy (A7-0462/2013 - Hermann Winkler)
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund 2014-2020 (A7-0005/2013 - Marian Harkin)
Civil protection mechanism (A7-0003/2013 - Elisabetta Gardini)
Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development - Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products - Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP - Transitional provisions on support for rural development (debate)
Common provisions on European funds (A7-0274/2013 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Angela Krehl)
European Regional Development Fund and the 'investment for growth and jobs' goal (A7-0268/2013 - Jan Olbrycht)
European Regional Development Fund and the 'European territorial cooperation' goal (A7-0280/2013 - Riikka Pakarinen)
Statement by the President
Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 (A7-0389/2013 - Jean-Luc Dehaene, Ivailo Kalfin)
Connecting Europe Facility (A7-0021/2013 - Adina-Ioana Vălean, Dominique Riquet, Inés Ayala Sender)
Trans-European transport network (A7-0012/2013 - Georgios Koumoutsakos, Ismail Ertug)
Budgetary constraints for regional and local authorities regarding the EU's Structural Funds (A7-0269/2013 - Erminia Mazzoni)
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (debate)
Implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (A7-0230/2013 - Anni Podimata)
External aviation policy (A7-0172/2013 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Blue growth - enhancing sustainable growth in the marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors (A7-0209/2013 - Spyros Danellis)
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (A7-0183/2013 - Emer Costello)
A new agenda for European consumer policy (A7-0163/2013 - Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón)
Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens (A7-0162/2013 - Mojca Kleva Kekuš)
Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (A7-0154/2013 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz)
Regional strategies for industrial areas in the European Union (A7-0145/2013 - Jens Geier)
European Central Bank annual report (2011) (A7-0031/2013 - Marisa Matias)
Groundhandling services at European Union airports (A7-0364/2012 - Artur Zasada)
Asbestos-related occupational health threats and prospects for abolishing all existing asbestos (A7-0025/2013 - Stephen Hughes)
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP - 2011/0280(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) - 2011/0281(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - 2011/0282(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on financing, management and monitoring of the CAP - 2011/0288(COD) (debate)
Specific measures in favour of agriculture in the smaller Aegean islands (A7-0319/2011 - Georgios Papastamkos)
Specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (A7-0321/2011 - Gabriel Mato Adrover)
Improving access to finance for SMEs (A7-0001/2013 - Philippe De Backer)
Specific measures in favour of agriculture in the smaller Aegean islands - Specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (debate)
Credit rating agencies (A7-0221/2012 - Leonardo Domenici)
Role of EU cohesion policy in implementing the new European energy policy (A7-0437/2012 - Lena Kolarska-Bobińska)
Urban redevelopment as contribution to economic growth (A7-0406/2012 - Andrea Cozzolino)
Role of territorial development in cohesion policy (A7-0421/2012 - Derek Vaughan)
European Union Solidarity Fund, implementation and application (A7-0398/2012 - Rosa Estaràs Ferragut)
Introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at European Union airports - Groundhandling services at European Union airports - Allocation of slots at European Union airports
Introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at European Union airports - Groundhandling services at European Union airports - Allocation of slots at European Union airports
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
European disaster response: role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance (debate)
Explanations of vote
Tourism in Europe (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
2009 discharge (debate)
Vaccination against bluetongue (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
European statistics on tourism (debate)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote
Explanations of vote (continuation)
Effects of the Xynthia storm in Europe (debate)
Explanations of vote
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Reports (1)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast) PDF (423 KB) DOC (568 KB)
Shadow reports (13)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1192/69 of the Council on common rules for the normalisation of the accounts of railway undertakings PDF (174 KB) DOC (250 KB)
REPORT the evolution of EU macro-regional strategies: present practice and future prospects, especially in the Mediterranean PDF (233 KB) DOC (158 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers PDF (393 KB) DOC (579 KB)
REPORT on the future of regional airports and air services in the EU PDF (209 KB) DOC (120 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accelerated phasing-in of double-hull or equivalent design requirements for single-hull oil tankers (recast) PDF (203 KB) DOC (232 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Cooperation between the European Union and the International Civil Aviation Organization providing a framework for enhanced cooperation, and laying down procedural arrangements related thereto PDF (142 KB) DOC (70 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2002/546/EC as regards its period of application PDF (131 KB) DOC (70 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as regards repayable assistance and financial engineering PDF (216 KB) DOC (175 KB)
REPORT on ‘Towards a stronger European disaster response: the role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance’ PDF (264 KB) DOC (168 KB)
REPORT on Europe, the world’s No 1 tourist destination – a new political framework for tourism in Europe PDF (376 KB) DOC (264 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European Statistics on tourism PDF (244 KB) DOC (350 KB)
REPORT Report on the Commission communication: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters PDF (278 KB) DOC (192 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (recast) PDF (183 KB) DOC (200 KB)
Opinions (6)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy
OPINION on the future of regional airports and air services in the EU
OPINION Discharge for implementation of the budget of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2009
OPINION Discharge for implementation of the budget of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2009
OPINION Discharge for implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2009
OPINION Discharge for implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2009
Shadow opinions (11)
OPINION on Blue Growth - Enhancing sustainable growth in the EU’s marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the award of concession contracts
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund repealing Council Regulation(EC) No 1198/2006 and Council Regulation(EC) No 861/2006 and Council Regulation(EC) No XXX/2011 on integrated maritime policy
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Cohesion Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions concerning the European Regional Development Fund and the Investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the support from the European Regional and Development Fund to the European territorial cooperation goal
OPINION on honeybee health and the challenges for the beekeeping sector
OPINION International Trade Policy in the context of Climate Change imperatives
Written declarations (4)
Amendments (467)
Amendment 133 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Since ports are constituted of limited geographical areas, access to the market could, in certain cases, be subject to limitations relating to the economic capacity of the market itself to supply operators or to the scarcity of land or in case the land is reserved for certain type of activities in accordance with a formal development plan which plans in a transparent way the land use and with relevant national legislation such as those related to town and countrynational, regional and local planning objectives.
Amendment 162 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) It is necessary to impose on the managing body of the port which receives public funds, when it is also acting as a service provider, an obligation to keep separate accounts for activities carried outpublicly-funded activities in their capacity as managing body of the port from those carried out on a competitive basis in order to ensure a level playing field, transparency in the allocation and use of public funds and to avoid market distortions. In any case compliance with the State aid rules should be ensured.
Amendment 172 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Port service charges applied by providers of port services which are not designated in accordance with an open, transparent and non-discriminatory procedure entail a higher risk of price abuse given their monopolistic or oligopolistic situation and the fact that their market cannot be contested. The same is true for charges levied by internal operators in the meaning of this Regulation. For those services, in the absence of fair market mechanisms, arrangements should be established to ensure that the charges they levy areflect the normal conditions of itemised, are commensurate with the relevant market costs and are set in a transparent and non- discriminatory way.
Amendment 237 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. "cargo handling services" means the organisation and handling of cargo between the carrying waterborne vessel and the shore be it for import, export or transit of the cargo, including the processing, transporting and temporary storage of the cargo on the relevant cargo handling terminal and directly related to the transporting of the cargo, but excluding warehousing, stripping, repackaging or any other value added services related to thecargo handled cargoing in port;
Amendment 310 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) market capacity is not sufficient to guarantee the presence of more operators;
Amendment 337 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) environmental protection and safety of the port and port activities;
Amendment 348 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. In the cases provided for in Article 6 (1) (b) only, the competent authority may decide to provide a port service under public service obligations itself or to impose such obligations directly on a legally distinct entity over which it exercises a control similar to that exercised over its own departments. In such a case, the port service provider shall be considered as an internal operator for the purpose of this Regulation.
Amendment 352 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall be considered as exercising a control of a legally distinct entity similar to that exercised to its own departments only if it exercises a decisive influence over both the strategic objectives and the significant decisions of the controlled legal entity. This may occur, in particular, when (a) how the business is managed and the selection of staff depend on decisions by the competent authority; (b) the latter is empowered to supervise and check on the activities of the legally distinct entity or its personnel, which also bears on the appointment of persons empowered to represent and/or manage the body itself.
Amendment 364 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to national and Union law including collective agreements between social partners, the managing bodies of the port may require the designated provider of port services appointed in accordance with the procedure established by Article 7, in the case where this provider is different from the incumbent provider of port services, to grant staff previously taken on by the incumbent provider of port services, including those on board vessels hired for the services in question, the rights to which they would have been entitled if there had been a transfer within the meaning of Directive 2001/23/EC.
Amendment 391 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) all costs and revenues are correctly assigned or allocated for each service on the basis of consistently applied and objectively justifiable cost accounting principles; and
Amendment 403 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The charges for the services provided by an internal operator as referred to in Article 9 and the charges levied by providers of port service, in cases of limitation of the number of providers which have not been designated on the basis of procedures which are open, transparent and non- discriminatory, shall be set in a transparent and non-discriminatory way. These charges shall reflect the conditions on a competitive relevant market and shall not be disproportionate tobe commensurate with the economic value of the service provided.
Amendment 407 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The port service provider shall make available to the competent independent supervisory body as referred to in Article 17, upon request, information on the elements serving as a basis to determine the structure and the level of the port service charges that falls under the application of paragraph 1 of this Article. This information shall include the methodology used for setting the port charges with regard to the facilities and services to which these port service charges relate to.
Amendment 410 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The managing body of the port shall levy a port infrastructure charge. These charges may have the nature and form of taxes. This shall not prevent providers of port services which are using port infrastructures from levying port service charges.
Amendment 412 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. In order to contribute to an efficient infrastructure charging system, the structure and the level of port infrastructure charges shall be defined in an autonomous way by the managing body of the port according to its own commercial strategy and investment plan reflecting competitive conditions of the relevant market and in accordance with rules on State aid rulesand competition.
Amendment 459 #
2013/0157(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the proper coordination of port services within the port area, including those concerning safety and security;
Amendment 182 #
2013/0074(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) Services connected with use of the shoreline;
Amendment 277 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation in accordance with Article 7 if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances and that the cancellation could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. Such extraordinary circumstances can only be invoked insofar they affect the flight concerned or the previous flight operated by the same aircraft. The above does not exempt air carriers from the requirement to provide passengers with assistance, in accordance with Article 5(1)(b) and Article 9 of this Regulation.
Amendment 280 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than threeone and a half million passengers for at least three consecutive years, the airport managing body shall ensure that the operations of the airport and of airport users, in particular the air carriers and the suppliers of ground handling services, are coordinated through a proper contingency plan in view of possible situations of multiple cancellations and/or delays of flights leading to a considerable number of passengers stranded at the airport, including in cases of airline insolvency or revocation of the operating licence. The contingency plan shall be set up to ensure adequate information and assistance to the stranded passengers. The managing body of the airport shall communicate the contingency plan and any amendments to it to the National Enforcement Body designated pursuant to Article 16. At airports below the above- mentioned threshold, the airport management body shall make all reasonable efforts to coordinate airport users and to assist and inform stranded passengers in such situations.
Amendment 307 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 316 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 323 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 544 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 2027/97
Article 6d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 83 #
2013/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In view of creating framework conditions for enabling society to fully reap the benefits of effective opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail it is important that Member States ensure (a) an adequate level of social protection for the staff of public service operators. (b) a minimum service level during public transport strikes
Amendment 183 #
2013/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No. 1370/2007
Article 2 a (new) – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 2 a (new) – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) a framework that establishes a minimum level of services during public transport strikes
Amendment 53 #
2013/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Takes the view that State aid represents a legitimate compensation with respect to the handicap of insularity and that such condition should be considered as the sole criterion for the purposes of the territorial coverage of the Regional State Aid 2014 - 2020 in order to enable insular territories overcome their structural handicaps and to ensure the conditions for economic, social and territorial growth;
Amendment 94 #
2013/0000(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Considers that an increase in the threshold for de minimis aid, with special reference to the agriculture, transport and fishery sectors can contribute to making island territories equally competitive with the mainland territories so as to reduce the gap between different levels of development among European regions and ensure their effective integration in the single market;
Amendment 21 #
2012/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises the importance of airport hubs and the urgent need for investments to be made in airport infrastructure in order to increase airport capacity and thus guard against any loss of air traffic to other parts of the world, such as the Middle East and South-East Asia;
Amendment 24 #
2012/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Points out that, in addition to an increase in the capacity of airports, significant long-term investment in upgrading airport infrastructure is required; stresses, furthermore, that use of the existing capacity needs to be optimised by allocating takeoff and landing slots more efficiently, as provided for in the Airports Package put forward by the Commission; believes that some of the slot-related proposals currently under discussion, such as the establishment of a secondary market and the option of using local rules at airports, would enable airlines to make better use of the capacity available at European airports;
Amendment 41 #
2012/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to complete agreements with neighbouring countries such as Ukraine, Turkey, Lebanon, Tunisia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Algeria and Libya; points out that the proximity of these countries and their markets and the economic growth that has occurred in some of them in recent times may be seen as a growth opportunity for regional and secondary airports in the EU; takes the view that, given the large amount of capacity at regional airports, such airports can play a part in reducing congestion at the main European hubs, thus making them more competitive at global level;
Amendment 9 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the coastal and maritime policy should be included in the general framework of the 2014-2020 programming period, also with a view to achieving the objectives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 10 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the objective of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth for coastal and island areas must be backed up by a rigorous analysis of the systemic and structural handicaps that characterise these areas;
Amendment 11 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas the EU's island system, as far as maritime transport is concerned, has to bear significantly higher costs than the other coastal areas of the EU;
Amendment 12 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas the seasonal nature of tourism strongly compromises the development of coastal and island areas and an ad hoc strategy should be developed to counter this problem;
Amendment 13 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E e (new)
Recital E e (new)
Ee. whereas the establishment of free zones, as laid down in the Community Customs Code, can reasonably contribute to mitigating the state of economic and social crisis that is affecting many coastal and island areas in the European Union;
Amendment 24 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that island territories are adequately taken into account in the negotiations on the new Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020, so that they can benefit from additional funding to compensate for the disadvantage deriving from their remoteness from the European single market;
Amendment 25 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Notes the conditions of economic crisis and the social problems that are affecting many areas, particularly islands, above all in the Mediterranean and especially those which are very distant from the mainland; is of the view that the remoteness of the islands in relation to the European single market exposes them to industrial and economic stagnation and depopulation, which must be the target of specific measures by the European institutions; urges the Commission, therefore, to consider establishing free zones as a tool which, by reducing the tax burden and attracting foreign direct investment, could halt the downward spiral that is affecting island areas by driving growth and development;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to develop an initiative to encourage the mobility of research staff, especially in coastal areas, with specific reference to the areas of tourism, energy and biotechnology, along the lines of Erasmus, to be implemented as a priority during low tourist seasons in order to balance, in a sustainable manner, the flows of people in increasingly sensitive ecosystems, whilst at the same time optimising the use of the infrastructure of coastal areas and islands;
Amendment 69 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Takes the view that, in the light of the additional costs incurred by island regions in the maritime transport sector, EU maritime policy should adopt compensatory measures to promote the territorial continuity of islands and provide a level playing field in relation to the mainland, in terms of access to the single market, and greater protection for maritime users; hopes that islands will be fully integrated into the Motorways of the Sea in order to improve their accessibility and increase their economic competitiveness;
Amendment 93 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States, regions, autonomous communities and other stakeholders in coastal and island areas to develop and implement, in a systemic manner, the 'ancient trade routes' initiative, approved by the European Parliament in the 2013 budget, both in the Mediterranean basin and in other basins that affect Europe, especially in order to diversify tourism products and reduce the seasonal nature of tourism;
Amendment 97 #
2012/2297(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to include maritime and coastal tourism in related actions and programmes, such as the ‘EDEN - European Destinations of Excellence’' and the ‘Calypso’ programmes' programmes; encourages the Commission to promote further programmes aimed at strengthening tourism demand in coastal and island regions outside peak seasons, encouraging tourist exchanges between Member States in the low season; considers, in this regard, that the diversification of tourism can help to increase the attractiveness of maritime regions and enable them to move beyond the traditional 'sun, sea and sand' model;
Amendment 53 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on carriers to make greater efforts to inform passengers more fully; considers that information must be provided in time and be readily understandable, exact, and complete, and that, as regards possible travel problems, passengers must be made aware of their rights at the outset, when they book a trip; to that end, calls on the Commission to recommend that the national authorities organise professional training courses for specialist staff, who should provide consumers with appropriate, true information;
Amendment 62 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s new smartphone application, which provides information about passenger rights in several languages and in a format accessible to passengers with disabilities; calls on the Member States and carriers to press ahead with the development and use of similar modern technologies (including SMS and the use of social networks); calls on the Commission, however, always to take due account of the fact that elderly people, when travelling, do not always have access to modern technologies;
Amendment 97 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to enable the current law on price transparency and unfair commercial practices to be implemented and enforced effectively, in accordance with Directive 2011/83/EC, and to ensure that the headline price corresponds exactly to the final price and that no unreasonable extra costs (e.g. handling charges or a charge for payment by credit card) are added just before a purchase is made; calls on the Commission to introduce a system of penalties to be applied should it be established that EU law on price transparency has been infringed;
Amendment 120 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to use its influence in order to provide joint complaint-handling machinery for the national enforcement bodies in the form of a central electronic clearing-house; believes that the clearing-house should advise passengers lodging complaints and, to save time and costs, refer them to the appropriate national enforcement body; recommends, as regards the information and advice to be obtained through the clearing-house, that a standard e-mail address be adopted and an inexpensive EU-wide hotlineEU-wide freephone number set up;
Amendment 139 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to produce a standard EU-wide complaint form, to be translated into all EU languages and used for all modes, which should be given to passengers when they make a reservation; believes that a fixed maximum time limit for handling complaints should be laid down for all modessuggests that the Commission should set a time limit within which complaints, for all means of transport, should be dealt with, in order to give consumers a specific answer within an acceptable time frame;
Amendment 168 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to consider whregulate action to take shouldt EU level procedures to settle airlines go bankruptcy cases, and draws attention in this connection to its resolution of 25 November 2009; points out that after purchasing a plane ticket and in case of bankruptcy of the airline, consumers still have nobody to turn to in order to claim back a refund of the unused ticket;
Amendment 19 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that European legislation on animal welfare in transport must not lead to distortions in the free trade in goods or entail disproportionate economic costs, while the particular situation of peripheral and, outermost and island regions must also be taken into account;
Amendment 39 #
2012/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Refers to Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of the Council, according to which the Commission's report on the impact of the aforementioned regulation must ‘take into account the scientific evidence of the welfare requirements of animals’; to this end and in accordance with Written Declaration 49/2011 adopted by majority vote by the European Parliament on 15 March 2012, calls upon the Commission and Council to amend Regulation 1/2005 by introducing ‘a maximum of 8 hours for the transport of animals for slaughter.’
Amendment 287 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5
Article 28 – paragraph 5
5. Provided that the principle of separation of functions is respected, the managing authority, and the certifying authority, where applicable, and the audit authority may be part of the same public authority or body. In order to ensure that the audit authority may carry out its assessment and control duties in a fully independent manner, it must be part of a public authority or body different from that of the managing and certification authority.
Amendment 294 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Amendment 297 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. The Member State shall supervise the designated body and withdraw its designation by formal decision if one or more of the criteria referred to in paragraph 2 are no longer met, unless the body takes the necessary remedial actions within a period of probation to be determined by the Member State according to the severity of the problem. That period shall be no longer than three months. The Member State shall notify the Commission immediately of the setting of any probation period for a designated body and of any withdrawal decision.
Amendment 300 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to audits carried out by Member States, Commission officials or authorised Commission representatives may carry out on-the-spot audits or checks upon giving adequatewithout prior notice. The scope of such audits or checks may include, in particular, verification of the effective functioning of management and control systems in an operational programme or a part thereof, operations and assessment of the sound financial management of operations or operational programme. Officials or authorised representatives of the Member State may take part in such audits.
Amendment 319 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
Article 45 – paragraph 2
2. Upon request by the Commission, the Member State shall provide further information to the Commission. If a Member State does not provide the requested information by the deadline for its submission set by the Commission, the Commission mayshall not take its decision on the acceptance of the accounts on the basis of the information in its possessionuntil that information has been supplied.
Amendment 19 #
2011/2307(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises the important role that regional policies can play in enhancing and safeguarding biodiversity, and calls on the Council and Member States to adopt the proposal for a regulation approved by the European Parliament amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory;
Amendment 14 #
2011/2201(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Requests that a report be attached to each year's budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 15 #
2011/2201(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Calls on the Commission, in the interests of greater transparency and in order to firmly establish the principle of the personal liability of officials who manage public monies, to prepare a study, based on the experiences in Member States, on the feasibility of introducing, within the EU institutions, the notion of liability for losses to the budget or, in other words, the personal pecuniary liability of any official who, through his actions or failure to take action, has occasioned financial losses to the European Union;
Amendment 2 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas there is currently no adequauniversally accepted definition for the term ‘regional airport’; whereas, therefore, for the purposes of this report, only ‘minor regional airports sha’ will be defined as ‘non-hub’ airports, regardlestaken into account, i.e. ‘non-hub’ airports, and these will be subdivided into major and minor airports, on the basis of passenger throughput, and; whereas, however, ‘regional air service’ shallould be defined as a flight departing from and/or landing at a regional airport;
Amendment 3 #
2011/2196(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union by connecting regions; points out that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility of regions, such as peripheral andor island regions, that face geographical handicap or central areas not lying on the main transport routes, that face geographical handicaps; favours the option of concluding partnership agreements backed by national and regional authorities and airlines; notes the importance of airports, especially of regional airports, which are sometimes the only effective link between a region and the rest of Europe;
Amendment 6 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas regional airports play a vital role of furthering EU cohesion policy, as an important means of ensuring the accessibility and territorial integration of geographically disadvantaged areas, such as outlying and island regions;
Amendment 9 #
2011/2196(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that irrational proliferation of further regional airports would run counter to efficiency and sustainability criteria; maintains on the contrary that existing links should be strengthened, especially in areas (islands, for example) suffering from geographical handicaps; accordingly welcomes any initiative aimed at developing the role of public transport, including transport by road, in promoting links;
Amendment 18 #
2011/2196(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports for job creation, particularly in less developed or disadvantaged regions; stresses, in that connection, the need to exploit the potential for green jobs more effectively; maintains, however, that the working conditions of airport staff must be respected, providing for minimum standards of protection, which frequently do not exist where the bulk of the traffic is accounted for by low-cost airlines;
Amendment 24 #
2011/2196(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of environmental and meteorological factors and rational criteria when deciding where to locate airports;
Amendment 36 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Understands the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic interest, especially those connecting remote regions and islandStresses that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility of regions, such as outlying and island regions, that face geographical handicaps; believes that such services would not be economically viable without public money;
Amendment 47 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that adequate development of regional airports contributes to parallel development of the tourist system, which is a vitally important area for many European regions; calls for airport staff to benefit from decent contractual terms, with particular reference to airports in which most of the traffic is accounted for by low-cost airlines;
Amendment 52 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the companies responsible for the management of regional airports to make the necessary structural alterations to accommodate disabled people so as to enable them to access the various airport areas without assistance and to use all services without difficulty;
Amendment 75 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States and local and regional authorities to use and modernise existing facilities before building new ones; calls for due account to be taken of the environmental, meteorological, territorial and geological features of the area concerned in any decision to construct or extend airport facilities;
Amendment 89 #
2011/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; calls for the development of rail links between airports in order to lessen the capacity problems of airports and ease user mobility;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas, notwithstanding the fact that Article 174 of the TFEU commits the European Union to promoting uniform development by reducing the gap of the least favoured regions, including insular regions, the European institutions have not yet adopted an ad hoc strategy that takes into account the specific needs of the islands;
Amendment 17 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the full accessibility of Mediterranean insular regions can only be ensured through the allocation of additional resources in the field of maritime and aviation transport;
Amendment 18 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J c (new)
Recital J c (new)
Jc. whereas the economic and social development of the European Union is achieved through a better integration of the insular territories within the European Single Market and to that end, the Commission should adopt an integrated approach on the insularity issue;
Amendment 19 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J d (new)
Recital J d (new)
Jd. whereas the Commission's action towards insularity has been so far lacking despite the fact that the Treaties recognize the long-standing structural disadvantage faced by island populations in terms of cost to be incurred in the fields of energy and transport;
Amendment 73 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Sub-heading after paragraph (new)
Sub-heading after paragraph (new)
The insular dimension within the Mediterranean macroregion (This sentence is intended to be the title to a new small section on insularity at the very end of this report, right after "Prospects in the Mediterranean".)
Amendment 74 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Urges the Commission to take concrete actions aimed at implementing Article 174 of the TFEU and overcoming the handicap of insularity through the promotion of a strategy which guarantees uniform European economic and social development;
Amendment 75 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Believes that the Mediterranean insular territories should be eligible for additional funding, with particular reference to the transport sector, in order to ensure full accessibility and territorial continuity of these territories with the European continent and their effective integration with the Single Market;
Amendment 76 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18 d. Deems a better integration of islands with the European Single Market a key factor in promoting their social cohesion and economic growth within the European Union; to that aim, urges the Commission to adopt ad hoc measures that contribute to making insular territories equally competitive with the mainland territories;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 e (new)
Paragraph 18 e (new)
18 e. Hopes that the Commission may overcome its punitive attitude towards the insular territories whereas it considers state aids those which constitute legitimate compensation with respect to the discriminated condition of insularity;
Amendment 78 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 f (new)
Paragraph 18 f (new)
18 f. Calls on the Commission to formulate a comprehensive proposal aimed at overcoming the structural handicaps of islands territories;
Amendment 79 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 g (new)
Paragraph 18 g (new)
18 g. Considers necessary an increase in the threshold of de minimis aid for islands with special reference to the agriculture, transport and fishery sectors, in order to reduce the gap between different levels of development among European regions;
Amendment 80 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 h (new)
Paragraph 18 h (new)
18 h. Calls for the adaptation of cohesion policy and research and innovation policies to the specific needs of the insular regions and for the development of synergies between the Research Framework Programme Horizon 2020 and the Structural Funds, so as to encourage the first sprouts of excellence and increase investment in training;
Amendment 81 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 i (new)
Paragraph 18 i (new)
18 i. Recommends the appropriate use of the "Connecting Europe Facility" for transport, energy and information and communication technologies (ICT) in order to increase the integration of these regions into continental Europe;
Amendment 82 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 j (new)
Paragraph 18 j (new)
18 j. Stresses the importance of culture and creative industry as a fundamental pillar for development and job creation in the insular regions;
Amendment 83 #
2011/2179(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 k (new)
Paragraph 18 k (new)
18 k. Calls on the Commission to adopt an Action Plan for the Mediterranean macroregion strategy by the end of 2013, incorporating specific projects with broad involvement of all relevant stakeholders and regional partners and using all available financial instruments;
Amendment 8 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the transport sector is of major importance for the development of the European Union, its regions (including island, isolated and ultraperipheral regions) and its towns, as it accounts for some 5% of GDP, provides some 10 million jobs and is thus decisive for Europe’s position as an industrial and economic centre,
Amendment 9 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B bis (new)
Recital B bis (new)
B bis. whereas transport policy plays a role in promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in some areas, such as island regions, due to their specific characteristics,
Amendment 155 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 bis (new)
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 bis (new)
- account should be taken in particular of the need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions with the central regions of the Union in accordance with Article 170 of the TFEU;
Amendment 171 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of alternative and renewable energies for transport and highlights that the set goals could be reached using an energy mix and existing methods for saving energy, accompanied by the requisite infrastructure;
Amendment 309 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 1
Paragraph 16 – indent 1
– a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’, providing for specific and effective rules on the transport of hazardous goods;
Amendment 355 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new)
Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new)
- the introduction of effective rules on links between the islands and the rest of the continent, and clear guidelines on the public transport obligations in this area in order to overcome the obstacles imposed by isolation;
Amendment 376 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 – indent 3 bis (new)
Paragraph 17 – indent 3 bis (new)
- the introduction of effective rules on links between the islands and the rest of the continent, and clear guidelines on the public transport obligations in this area in order to overcome the obstacles imposed by isolation;
Amendment 400 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 – indent 3 bis (new)
Paragraph 18 – indent 3 bis (new)
- the Commission to take steps to ensure that Member States comply with measures requiring a reduction in the speed of goods trains carrying hazardous materials when passing through urban areas, and to take steps to standardise such measures, including traceability of trains carrying hazardous goods;
Amendment 92 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas at a time of rapid upheaval in agricultural markets and numerous new priority challenges (e.g. EU 2020), farmers urgently need reliability, particularly regarding the financial framework, and the European Parliament has already called for the appropriations allocated to agriculture in the 2013 budget to be maintained at least at the same level in the next financial planning period,
Amendment 112 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
Amendment 147 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
Amendment 176 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
Recital P
P. whereas rural development is an important instrument of the CAP and whereas the new programmes should be geared even more strongly to the priority objectives of rural development and of farmers (employment, the agricultural environment, water, climate change, innovation and education), in order to combat the abandonment of farming by young people and to facilitate the transition from one generation to the next,
Amendment 200 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WBroadly welcomes the cCommission Communication from the Commission concerning a reform of agricultural policy; calls, however, for the principles set out below to be incorporated in the legislative proposals"The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future", in particular option 2 for reform; calls, however, for the Commission to clarify as soon as possible its overall strategy for a viable and sustainable CAP for the future;
Amendment 202 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Expects the re-design of the CAP to align with the EU 2020 Strategy priorities of smart, inclusive and sustainable growth; Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a major contribution to tackling climate change, creating new jobs through green growth and supplying renewable energy whilst at the same time continuing to provide safe, high quality food products and food security for European consumers;
Amendment 207 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for the CAP to remain structured around two pillars; Points out that pillar 1 should remain fully financed by the EU budget and yearly based, while multiannual programming, a voluntary and contractual approach and co- financing should continue to apply under pillar 2;
Amendment 209 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Insists that the two pillar structure should serve the purpose of clarity, each pillar complementing the other without overlapping; the first pillar should deliver EU-wide objectives which require 'across- the-board' action whereas the second pillar should be outcome-oriented and flexible enough to easily accommodate national, regional and/or local specificities;
Amendment 498 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 e (new)
Paragraph 14 e (new)
14e. Calls, however, for farmers to have the freedom to opt in to the measures if they want to receive the sustainability payment, and there will be no additional penalties if they choose not to;
Amendment 499 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 f (new)
Paragraph 14 f (new)
14f. Believes that any controls put in place to check the implementation of the payments received under the sustainability top-up should be accommodated within the current integrated agricultural control system (IACS), so as to avoid the duplication of control systems under pillar 1, and that when on-farm checks are necessary, they take place at the same time as the checks already carried out for cross-compliance requirements and direct payments entitlements, or at the same time as checks on compliance with agri- environmental measures under pillar 2;
Amendment 773 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that direct payments are no longer justified without cross compliance (CC) and therefore that the CC system should apply to all recipients of direct payments19;
Amendment 883 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Considers that a multi-stageinimum safety net comprising private storage, and public intervention, market disruption instruments and an emergency clause would confer the greatest possible benefit; calls for private storage and public intervention to be permitted for specific sectors where market disruptions are of limited duration; calls furthermo should be available to tackle market crisis and believes the Commission must have the powers and the resources to react quickly to a major crisis; considers there for a market disruption instrument and an emergency clause to be established for all sectors in common, making it possible for the Commission, under certain circumstances, in the event of crises to take action over a limited period which goes beyond the existing instrumene, that a special reserve budget line which could be swiftly activated should be made available in future EU budgets to provide a rapid reaction tool in the event of severe crises in the agricultural markets;
Amendment 1003 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 a (new)
Paragraph 44 a (new)
44 a. Recalls that EU farmers are required to produce food to the highest safety, environmental, quality and animal welfare standards and should be rewarded for doing so; believes that imports from third countries should, respecting WTO rights and obligations, meet equivalent standards to ensure fairer competition; calls on the Commission to uphold the interests of European farmers in the context of multilateral and bilateral trade agreements negotiated on behalf of the EU;
Amendment 1014 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Advocates that the 2006 sugar market reform be extendreviewed toin 2020 in its existing form in order to develop a system for the subsequent period which can operate without quotas15 with a view to bringing in further reforms by 2020;
Amendment 1040 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Observes thatAsks for solutions to be formulated at global level to tackle abuses of speculation in agricultural commodities should be combated; adand extreme price voclates a worldwide notification system for agricultural stocks; observesility as they potentially put food security at risk; insists in thatis consideration should be given to maintaining stocks of vital agricultural commoditietext that the EU should adopt a coordinated approach with its trade partners in order to avoid further markets disruptions;
Amendment 1049 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
Paragraph 47 a (new)
47 a. Calls for measures to be taken to strengthen primary producers' and producer organisations' management capacity and bargaining power vis-à-vis other economic operators in the food chain (primarily retailers, processors and input companies), provided these developments do not hinder the proper functioning of the internal market; takes the view that the functioning of the food supply-chain should be improved, through greater transparency of food prices and action to address unfair commercial practices, enabling farmers to obtain the added value they deserve; believes that the appointment of ombudsmen should be considered with a view to solving disputes between the operators along the food supply-chain;
Amendment 1057 #
Amendment 1162 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 a (new)
Paragraph 50 a (new)
50 a. Stresses that less favoured areas are often of high value in terms of the cultivated landscape, biodiversity preservation and provision of environmental benefits, as well as rural areas dynamism; Asks the Commission, therefore, to orientate its compensatory programmes for these specific areas towards these goals through a careful choice of biophysical selection criteria; Recalls in this context that the European Parliament, in its resolution of 5th May 2010, asked for additional criteria to be considered such as 'isolation' to address difficulties arising from distance from the market, remoteness and limited access to services, as well as the inclusion of a 'field-capacity days' criterion to address the interaction between soil types and climate and notably reflect maritime climate difficulties;
Amendment 1169 #
2011/2051(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
Paragraph 51
51. Stresses at the same time, however, that rural structures differ widely in the Member States and therefore require different measures; calls therefore for flexibility to allow the Member States to adopt voluntary measures, thwhich could be co-financing rate for which should be based on the rates current at the timeed by the EU on the condition that these measures have been notified to the Commission and approved;
Amendment 1243 #
Amendment 13 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the recent tragedies, notablysuch as for instance the Haiti earthquake and the Pakistan floods, have demonstrated that the main tools available to the EU for responding to disasters (humanitarian aid and the EU Civil Protection Mechanism) proved to be working well for what they were designed for and given the circumstances, but whereas there is scope for improvement in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and visibility of the EU assistance as a whole,
Amendment 19 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 37 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for the principle of subsidiarity to be respected in regard to the capability of Member States to use their own assets, specifically when national emergencies occur that justify this;
Amendment 40 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reasserts that disaster preparation, prevention and response cannot be dissociated one from one another and that it would therefore be advisable to consolidate an integrated approach to tackling catastrophes;
Amendment 45 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls once again on the Commission to bring forward proposals as soon as possible for establishing an EU Civil Protection Force based on theeffective and efficient EU Civil Protection Mechanism and enabling the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing immediate emergency relief aid to the victims without actually establishing a civil protection force (i.e. a supranational body) that would duplicate costs and powers;
Amendment 58 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 61 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that particular attention should be paid to fires, for which targeted strategies and actions are needed;
Amendment 64 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the pool of pre-identified assets made available on a voluntary basis for EU disaster relief interventions, both inside and outside the Union, will constitute the nucleus of the EU relief capability, which could be complemented by additional ad hoc offers from the Member States; recommends that a clear and detailed scheme of incentives should be designed in order to permit Member States to commit sufficient capacities to the voluntary pool without increasing the overall spending of the Member States;
Amendment 78 #
2011/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for political coordination in view of the respective institutional roles of the European Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European External Action Service (EEAS) responsible for political aspects of Common Foreign and Security Policy, without hindering or slowing down relief operationsWishes to see, where possible, coordination between the EU’s institutional actors in a way that is mindful of their respective powers and respects the limits of each one’s mandate; calls therefore on the Commission and the EEAS to develop working arrangements with regard to the coordination of issues pertaining to the EU disaster response;
Amendment 51 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 5
Article 1 – paragraph 5
2. The Mechanism shall not affect Member States' responsibility to protect people, the environment and property on their territory against disasters and endowing. It shall supplement Member States’ national funding so as to endow their emergency management systems with sufficient capabilities to enable them to cope adequately with disasters of a magnitude and nature that can reasonably be expected and prepared for.
Amendment 56 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Amendment 60 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Amendment 62 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. "“disaster” or “major disaster" means any situation, which has or may have an adverse impact on people, the environment or property and which may result in a call for assistance under the Mechanism;
Amendment 64 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. "response" means any action taken under the Mechanism during or after a disaster or major disaster to address its immediate adverse consequences;
Amendment 84 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. With a view to ensuring the effective participation of all public entities involved in environmental protection, Member States shall stipulate the mandatory inclusion in all general or individual, national, regional and local operational programmes of an expenditure item specifically earmarked for ‘costs for preventing natural phenomena and disasters’; the Commission recognises the need for the reformulation of operational programmes approved by Member States in this area;
Amendment 122 #
2011/0461(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Amendment 7 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Concessions are contracts for pecuniary interest concluded between one or more economic operators and one or more contracting authorities or entities and having as their object the acquisition of works or services where the consideration consists, normally, in the right to exploit the works or services that are the subject of the contract. The execution of these works or services are subject to specific binding obligations defined by the contracting authority or entity which are legally enforceable. By contrast, certain State acts such as authorisations or licences whereby the State or a public authority establishes the conditions for the exercise of an economic activity, should not qualify as concessions. The same applies to certain agreements having as their object the right of an economic operator to exploit certain public domains or resources, such as land lease contracts, including maritime areas, whereby the State or contracting authority or entity establishes only general conditions for their use without acquiring specific works or services.
Amendment 10 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Concessions are contracts for pecuniary interest concluded between one or more economic operators and one or more contracting authorities or entities and having as their object the acquisition of works or services where the consideration consists, normally, in the right to exploit the works or services that are the subject of the contract. The execution of these works or services are subject to specific binding obligations defined by the contracting authority or entity which are legally enforceable. By contrast, certain State acts such as authorisations or licences whereby the State or a public authority establishes the conditions for the exercise of an economic activity, should not qualify as concessions. The same applies to certain agreements having as their object the right of an economic operator to exploit certain public domains or resources, such as land lease contracts, including maritime areas, whereby the State or contracting authority or entity establishes only general conditions for their use without acquiring specific works or services.
Amendment 28 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the acquisition or rental, by whatever financial means, of land, existing buildings or other immovable property, including maritime areas, or concerning rights thereon; however financial service concessions awarded at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive;
Amendment 35 #
2011/0437(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the acquisition or rental, by whatever financial means, of land, existing buildings or other immovable property, including maritime areas, or concerning rights thereon; however financial service concessions awarded at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive;
Amendment 17 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Assistance should continue to make use of the structures and instruments that have proved their worth in the pre- accession process. The transition from direct management of pre-accession funds by the Commission to decentralised management delegated to the beneficiary countries should be progressive and in line with each beneficiary country's capacities. In order to fight corruption, transparency, good management, prevention of misconduct, compliance and monitoring, accountability and control should be increased and stronger auditing measures should be adopted during this process.
Amendment 20 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v
(v) development of physical capital, the improvement of connections with Union infrastructures and regional networks.
Amendment 23 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the transition process towards Union membership, citizens' awareness of the European Union and capacity building;
Amendment 27 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The strategy paper of any country nearing accession (at least one year before becoming a Member State of the Union) shall provide for a transitional period from IPA instrument to Structural and Cohesion Funds. During that period a task force for the management of Union funds shall be set up to assist the relevant authority in defining the kind of technical assistance to be provided.
Amendment 28 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. The strategy papers shall be reviewed at mid-term and revised as appropriate. They may be revised at any time at the initiative of the Commission. The European Parliament shall be empowered to ask the Commission to revise the strategy papers. In the event of a negative response, the Commission shall provide a full explanation.
Amendment 105 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘Marginally compliant aircraft’ means civil aircraft that meet the Chapter 3 certification limits laid down in Volume 1, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention) by a cumulative margin of less than 108 EPNdB (Effective Perceived Noise in decibels) during a transition phase of four years, and thereafter by a cumulative margin of less than 10 EPNdB, whereby the cumulative margin is the figure expressed in EPNdB obtained by adding the individual margins (i.e. the differences between the certificated noise level and the maximum permitted noise level) at each of the three reference noise measurement points as defined in Volume 1, Part II, Chapter 4 of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention;
Amendment 109 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘Operating restrictions’ means a noise- related action that limits the access to or reduces the optimal capacity use of an airport, including operating restrictions aimed at the withdrawal from operations of marginally compliant aircraft at specific airports as well as operating restrictions of a partial nature, affecting the operation of civil aircraft according that are applied to given slots or only to tisome periodairport runways.
Amendment 255 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) aircraft used for humanitarian flights.
Amendment 264 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
With reference to this Regulation, the right of scrutiny of the Commission shall be limited solely and exclusively to checking the procedural compliance of the operating restriction adopted by the competent authority in accordance with the subsidiarity principle.
Amendment 96 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) It is necessary to define obligatory minimum quality standards to be met by suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users in order to ensure the overall quality of service and establish a level playing field among suppliers. Since discontinuity of staff can have a detrimental effect on the quality of groundhandling services, there is a need to adopt appropriate measures to avoid collective redundancies.
Amendment 137 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
All airport users shall be free to self- handle in compliance with the quality and security standards laid down in this Regulation.
Amendment 154 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
However, Member States shall not limit this number to fewer than two suppliers for each category of groundhandling services or, for airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 5 million passengers or 100 000 tonnes of freight for at least the previous three years, to fewer than three suppliers for each category of groundhandling services.
Amendment 162 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
At airports where the number of suppliers is limited to two or more suppliers in accordance with paragraph (2) of this Article, or Article 14 (1) (a) and (c), at least one of the authorised suppliers shall not be directly or indirectly controlled by:
Amendment 173 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – indent 2
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – indent 2
Amendment 188 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Amendment 217 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point g a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point g a (new)
(ga) an internationally-recognised audit attesting to the sound environmental performance of the supplier.
Amendment 237 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
In the case of airports located on islands, where it is not in the economic interests of undertakings or airlines to supply the services under Article 6(2), airport managing bodies themselves may assume responsibility for supplying essential services in order to guarantee the smooth operation of the airport facilities.
Amendment 242 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 252 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
The managing body of the airport shall organise a procedure for consultation on the application of this Regulation between itself, the Airport Users' Committee and the undertakings providing groundhandling services. This consultation shall cover, inter alia, the price of those groundhandling services for which an exemption has been granted pursuant to Article 14 (1) (b) and (c) and the organisation of the provision of those services. A consultation meeting shall be held at least once a year. The managing body of the airport shall make a record of that meeting which shall be sent to the Commission at its request. Trade union representatives shall have the right to attend these consultations as observers.
Amendment 258 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 2 million passenger movements or 50 000 tonnes of freight for at least three consecutive years, nNo undertaking shall be permitted to provide ground-handling services whether as a supplier of ground-handling services, a subcontractor or as a self-handling user unless it has been granted the appropriate approval. An undertaking meeting the requirements of this Chapter shall be entitled to receive an approval.
Amendment 409 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In addition, at airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 5 million passengers or 100 000 tonnes of freight for at least three consecutive years:
Amendment 439 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 5 million passenger movements or 100 000 tonnes of freight for at least the previous three years, tThe managing body of the airport or, where appropriate, the public authority or any other body which controls the airport shall set minimum quality standards for the performance of groundhandling services.
Amendment 475 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 5 million passenger movements or 100 000 tonnes of freight for at least three consecutive years, sSuppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall report on their operational performance to the Commission.
Amendment 483 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Every employee involved in the provision of groundhandling services shall attend at least twofive days of training relevant for the tasks assigned to the employee. Every employee shall attend the relevant training when taking up a new job or when a new task is assigned to the employee.
Amendment 511 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Only operators that have demonstrated that they are qualified and reliable shall be awarded subcontracts.
Amendment 512 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. The contracting entity may restrict the number of subcontractors when this is required on the grounds of space or capacity.
Amendment 520 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 537 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
Article 45 – paragraph 2
Amendment 133 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall encourage close cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to develop common projects at a European level. In order to further improve the system for the allocation of slots at European airports and in the light of the progress of thesemade in the common projects, the progress made in implementing the Single European Sky and the results of the assessment report mentioned in Article 21, the Commission shall adopt implementing measuredelegated acts for creating athe post of European coordinator. The implementing measuredelegated acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedures referred to in Article 16(2)5. The principles governing the coordinator'’s independence, in paragraph 3 of thiscluding in financial terms and in terms of their essential functions and organisational and decision-making terms, referred to in Article 5(3) apply mutatis mutandis to the European coordinator. The Commission shall appoint the European coordinator in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
Amendment 273 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated actsdelegation of power referred to in Article 3(3) in fine shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the entry into force of this Regulation period of five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
Amendment 9 #
2011/0301(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) A further step forward, which should be carefully assessed, is the public issuing of project bonds by the Union, targeted at financing infrastructure projects with European added value such as TEN-T, TEN-E, etc. In this case, the issuing of the project bond would have to follow a preliminary phase during which details of the project emerge, so as to enable close consideration of the risks and benefits of that project.
Amendment 19 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) The construction of energy infrastructure networks should not, under any circumstances, damage Europe’s (artistic, cultural, touristic, or environmental) heritage, as referred to in the European Parliament resolution of 27 September 2011 on ‘Europe, the world’s No 1 tourist destination – a new political framework for tourism in Europe’1, in which the Commission and the Member States are urged to ‘take all appropriate measures to safeguard Europe’s heritage and assets for future generations’. _____________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0407.
Amendment 20 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) When planning the various trans- European networks, the preferred option should be integration of transport, communication, and energy networks in order to save as much space as possible and, wherever possible, reuse existing and/or disused routes so as to reduce the socio-economic, environmental, and financial impact to a minimum.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) Energy infrastructure, especially where transport networks are concerned, should be planned and laid down in such a way as to ensure that there would be no columns of vehicles transporting oil within or close to residential areas, in order to rule out all possibility of endangering residents’ safety.
Amendment 42 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The establishment of a single competent authority at national level integrating or, the decision-making body of which should include a manager delegated by the relevant regional authority and coordinatinge all permit granting procedures ("one-stop shop"), should reduce complexity, increase efficiency and transparency and help enhance cooperation among Member States.
Amendment 44 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) When the various trans-European networks are being planned, preference should be given to integrating transport, communication and energy networks in order to ensure that as little land as possible is taken up, whilst ensuring, where possible, that existing and/or disused routes are reused, in order to reduce to a minimum any social, economic, environmental and financial impact and the burden on the land.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22 a (new)
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) Energy infrastructure, especially where backed up by and/or supplemented by transport networks, should be planned and finalised in such a way as to ensure that no columns of vehicles or trains transport oil through or near residential areas, in order to avoid endangering residents’ safety.
Amendment 56 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1
(1) For electricity projects falling under the categories set out in point 1 of Annex II, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States (including regions or autonomous communities involved in the project), national regulatory authorities, transmission system operators following their obligation to cooperate on a regional level in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2009/72/EC and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 and project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex I, as well as the Commission, the Agency and the ENTSO for Electricity.
Amendment 57 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
For gas projects falling under the categories set out in point 2 of Annex II, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States, (including regions or autonomous communities involved in the project), national regulatory authorities, transmission system operators following their obligation to cooperate on a regional level in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2009/73/EC and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 and project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex 1I, as well as the Commission, the Agency and the ENTSO for Gas.
Amendment 59 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 3
Annex III – part 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 3
For oil and carbon dioxide transport projects falling under the categories referred to in Annex II(3) and (4), each Group shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States (including regions or autonomous communities involved in the project), project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex 1 and the Commission.
Amendment 88 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Only in the event that energy infrastructure projects in transit through peripheral and/or island regions, also for the purpose of supplying the latter regions, should lose their status as projects of common interest, infrastructure links between these regions and the European network shall nevertheless be guaranteed.
Amendment 91 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) promote the project(s), for which he or she has been designated European coordinator and the cross-border dialogue between the project promoters, the regional and local authorities, the autonomous communities and all concerned stakeholders;
Amendment 107 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Within one month of the start of the permit granting process, pursuant to paragraph 1(a), the competent authority shall identify, in close cooperation with the other authorities concerned, the scope of material and level of detail of information to be submitted by the project promoter, as part of the application file, to apply for the comprehensive decision. The checklist referred to in point 1(e) of Annex VI shall serve as a basis for this identification. At least one meeting between the competent authority and the project promoter, and, if considered appropriate by the competent authority, the other authorities and stakeholders concerned shall take place to this aim. A detailed application outline, which shall include the results of this meeting, shall be transmitted to the project promoter and be made available to the public no later than one month after the meeting.
Amendment 109 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the authorities, stakeholders, and the public likely tothat must be concerned;
Amendment 113 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Within one month of the receipt of the application file, the competent authorityies, also at regional level, shall, if necessary, make further requests regarding missing or insufficient information to be submitted by the project promoter, which may conly address subjectscern detailed information on subjects which have not necessarily been identified in the detailed application outline. Within one month of the receipt of the complete application file, the competent authority shall accept the application in written form. Subsequently, requests for additional information may only be made if these are justified by new circumstances and duly explained by the competent authority.
Amendment 114 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The investment costs related to a project of common interest falling under the categories set out in points 1(a) to (d) and 2 of Annex II shall be borne by the transmission system operator(s) of the Member State(s) to which the project provides a net positive impact (taking due account of the long-term negative impact of transit easements), and be paid for by network users through tariffs for network access.
Amendment 118 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
Amendment 119 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
Amendment 128 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) general, regularly updated information, including geographic information (including GIS print-outs), maps and social and economic information on the areas concerned (especially relating to the population), for each project of common interest;
Amendment 141 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – introductory part
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) For electricity projects falling under the categories set out in point 1 of Annex II, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States (including any regions and autonomous communities involved in the project), national regulatory authorities, transmission system operators following their obligation to cooperate on a regional level in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2009/72/EC and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 and project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex I, as well as the Commission, the Agency and the ENTSO for Electricity.
Amendment 143 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – paragraph 1
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – paragraph 1
For gas projects falling under the categories set out in point 2 of Annex II, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States (including any regions and autonomous communities involved in the project), national regulatory authorities, transmission system operators following their obligation to cooperate on a regional level in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2009/73/EC and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 and project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex 1, as well as the Commission, the Agency and the ENTSO for Gas.
Amendment 145 #
2011/0300(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – paragraph 2
Annex 3 – part 1 – point 1 – paragraph 2
For oil and carbon dioxide transport projects falling under the categories referred to in Annex II(3) and (4), each Group shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States (including any regions and autonomous communities involved in the project), project promoters concerned by each of the relevant priorities designated in Annex 1 and the Commission.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) In order to make sure that the Union’s island regions are fully accessible and enjoy the benefits of inclusive growth and territorial cohesion, additional criteria such as surface area and population should be laid down for the purpose of identifying the core network, in order to include at least one port or airport for each island.
Amendment 33 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of European regions, including outermost regions and other peripheral , outlying and island regiones;
Amendment 48 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 47 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The methodology used to identify core network nodes shall take account of surface area and population, so as to include at least one port or airport for each island.
Amendment 55 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I, Volume 18/33
Annex I, Volume 18/33
Include the port of Olbia among the maritime ports in the core network in Annex I;
Amendment 56 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I, Volume 18/33
Annex I, Volume 18/33
Include the port of Cagliari among the maritime ports in the core network in Annex I;
Amendment 59 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2
Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2
Include the port of Olbia among the maritime ports in the core network in point 2 of Annex II;
Amendment 60 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2
Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2
Include the port of Cagliari among the maritime ports in the core network in point 2 of Annex II;
Amendment 912 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 18/33
Annex I – Volume 18/33
To add the port of Cagliari to the core network
Amendment 913 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 18/33
Annex I – Volume 18/33
To add the port of Olbia to the core network
Amendment 922 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 19/33
Annex I – Volume 19/33
To add the airport of Cagliari to the core network
Amendment 923 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 19/33
Annex I – Volume 19/33
To add the airport of Olbia to the core network
Amendment 951 #
Amendment 952 #
Amendment 969 #
Amendment 970 #
Amendment 21 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) This Regulation should, where fitting, allow exemptions in cases of force majeure, in exceptional circumstances and in cases of mis-programming by the regional legislator. In connection with agricultural regulations, the concept of force majeure should be interpreted in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice.
Amendment 24 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The financial resources required to cover the expenditure effected by the accredited paying agencies in respect of the EAGF, are to be made available to the Member States by the Commission in the form of reimbursements against the booking of the expenditure effected by those agencies. Until such reimbursements, in the form of monthly payments, have been paid, financial resources are to be mobilised by the Member States in accordance with the needs of their accredited paying agencies. TIn order to improve the operational efficiency of the paying agencies, the personnel costs and the administrative costs of the Member States and the beneficiaries involved in the execution of the CAP should be borne by the agencies themselves.
Amendment 34 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) An effective implementation of cross compliance requires verification at beneficiaries' level that obligations are respected. Where a Member State decides to make use of the option not to apply a reduction or exclusion where the amount concerned is less than EUR 100, the competent control authority should, for a sample of beneficiaries in the following year, verify that the findings of the non- compliance concerned have been remedied. Member States may also introduce an early -warning mechanism applicable to ‘teething’ non-compliances in order to make cross-compliance more palatable for the farming community and ensure a closer involvement of farmers in the implementation of requirement. This mechanism should take the form of a letter of warning, in response to which the beneficiary must take remedial action which shall be monitored by the Member State in the course of the following.
Amendment 35 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
ca) the sustainable development of the economic activities of agricultural holdings in line with all measures recommended in the rural development programmes, including farm modernisation, competitiveness building, sectoral integration, innovation and market orientation;
Amendment 36 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The competent national authority shall provide the potential beneficiary, where appropriate by the use ofprimarily by electronic means, with the appropriate list of designaselected bodies.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 2
Article 60 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall set up efficient and proportionate management and control systems that are risk-based and responsive to the specific needs of the target regions in order to ensure compliance with the legislation governing Union support schemes. Each Member State shall be responsible, via the national coordinating body, for adapting the management and control system to the specific characteristics of their regions, on the basis of the notifications made by the paying agencies under Article 7(3).
Amendment 49 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 76 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 76 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States may decide, taking into account the risk of overpayment, to pay up to 50 % as regards the payment referred to in Title III of Chapter 2 of Regulation xxxx/yyyy... (Direct payments) and 75 % for the support granted under rural development as referred to in Article 68(2), after finalisation of the administrative checks provided for in Article 61(1). The percentage shall be the same for all beneficiaries of the measure or set of measures.
Amendment 50 #
2011/0288(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 91 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may set up a warning system to allow beneficiaries in a situation of non-compliance to remedy the irregularity before any administrative penalty is imposed. Where a Member State decides to make use of this option, the competent authority shall forward an initial letter of warning to the beneficiary, notifying the finding and the obligation to take remedial action. The competent authority shall also take, in the following year, the actions necessary to verify that the beneficiary has remedied the situation of non-compliance concerned. This warning system shall only apply in cases of first non-compliance that are not considered 'severe' and whose 'extent' is strictly limited to the farm of the beneficiary responsible for the non-compliance, in line with the criteria as defined in Article 99a.
Amendment 14 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) The consumption of fruit and vegetables and milk products amongst children should be encouraged, including by durably increasing the share of those products in the diets of children at the stage when their eating habits are being formed. Union aid to finance or co-finance the supply to children in educational establishments of such products should therefore be promoted, encouraging at the same time the supply of goods that are seasonal and have a short supply chain.
Amendment 19 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) Taking into account the interest of consumers to receive adequate and transparent product information, it should be possible to determine the place of farming, on a case by case approach at the appropriate geographical level, not forgetting that incomplete and incorrect information can affect the economic and productive fabric of the area concerned, while taking into account the regional specificities of some sectors, in particular concerning processed agricultural products.
Amendment 27 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new)
ii(a) the olive oil and table olives sector;
Amendment 28 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) common and durum wheat, barley and maize;
Amendment 29 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) common and durum wheat, barley and maize, from 1 November to 31 May;
Amendment 30 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) may be opened by the Commission, by means of implementing acts, for durum wheat, barley, maize, and paddy rice (including specific varieties or types of paddy rice), if the market situation so requires. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2);
Amendment 31 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) for durum wheat, barley, maize, paddy rice and beef and veal.
Amendment 37 #
2011/0281(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. When drawing up their strategies, Member States shall draw up a list of products of the fruit and vegetables, processed fruit and vegetables, and bananas sectors that will be eligible under their respective schemes. This list, however, shall not include products excluded by the measures adopted by the Commission by means of delegated acts pursuant to point (a) of Article 22(2). Member States shall choose their products on the basis of objective criteria which mayshall include seasonality, and availability of produce orand may include environmental concerns. In this connection, Member States may give preference to products originating in the Union ensuring however that at least 50 % of produce is produced locally or within a radius of 180 km of its distribution point.
Amendment 34 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation and to avoid unfair competition or discrimination between farmers, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of: the fixation of the annual national ceiling for the basic payment scheme; the adoption of rules on applications for allocation of payment entitlements; the adoption of measures regarding the reversion of non- activated payment entitlements to the national reserve; the adoption of requirements related to the notification of transfer of payment entitlements to the national authorities and the deadlines within which such notification are to take place; the setting out of the annual ceiling for the payment for implementation of sustainable and beneficial agricultural practisces beneficial for the climate andthat curb and mitigate climate change and protect the environment; the setting out of the annual ceiling for the payment for areas with natural constraints; the setting out of the annual ceiling for the payment for the setting up of young farmers; the setting out of the annual ceilings for the voluntary coupled support; the adoption of rules on the procedure for the assessment and approval of decisions in the framework of the voluntary coupled support; the adoption of rules on the procedure of the authorisation and the notifications to the producers related to the authorisation of land and varieties for the purposes of the crop specific payment for cotton; the provision for rules on the calculation of the reduction of the amount of the crop specific payment for cotton; the adoption of rules concerning general notification requirements. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
Amendment 36 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Experience from the application of the various support schemes for farmers has shown that support was in a number of cases granted to beneficiaries whose business purpose was not or only marginally targeted at an agricultural activity, such as airports, railway companies, real estate companies and companies managing sport grounds. To ensure the better targeting of support, Member States should refrain from granting direct payments to such natural and legal persons. Smaller part-time farmers contribute directly to the vitality of rural areas, for that reason they should not be prevented from being granted direct payments granting of direct payments to them should be guaranteed.
Amendment 38 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) To avoid an excessive administrative burden caused by the managing of payments of small amounts, Member States should in general refrain from granting direct payments where the payment would be lower than EUR 100 or the eligible area of the holding for which support is claimed would be less than one0.3 hectares. However, as the structures of the Member States' agricultural economies vary considerably and may differ significantly from the average farm structure in the Union, Member States should be allowed to apply minimum thresholds that reflect their particular situation. Due to the very specific farming structure in the outermost regions, mountainous areas, island regions and the smaller Aegean Islands, Member States should be able to decide whether any minimum threshold should apply in those regions. Moreover, Member States should have the possibility to opt for the implementation of one of the two types of minimum threshold taking account of the particularities of the structures of their farming sectors. As payment could be granted to farmers with so-called ‘landless’ holdings, the application of the hectare- based threshold would be ineffective. The support-related minimum amount should therefore apply to such farmers. To ensure equal treatment of farmers whose direct payments are subject to phasing-in in Bulgaria and Romania, the minimum threshold should be based on the final amounts to be granted at the end of the phasing-in process.
Amendment 39 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The experience gained with the application of the single payment scheme shows that some of its main elements should be kept, including the determination of national ceilings to ensure that the total level of support does not exceed current budgetary constraints. Member States should also continue to operate a national reserve, administered at regional level, that should be used to facilitate the participation of young new farmers inew to the scheme or may be used to take account of specific needs in certain regions. Rules on the transfer and use of payment entitlements should be kept but, where possible, simplified.
Amendment 40 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) To guarantee ‘green’ measures defined by Member States as applicable on their territory in order to furnish equivalent benefits for the environment and the climate, Member States or the regions, on the basis of their constitutional systems, shall choose at least two relevant measures from the list of measures established at Community level, selecting a third measure more suited to the peculiarities of their territory from a set of optional measures, subject to the Commission approving their choices within two months of being notified thereof.
Amendment 41 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 b (new)
Recital 26 b (new)
(26b) To ensure that sustainable and beneficial agricultural practises that curb and mitigate climate change and protect the environment are effective, groups of farmers should be able to sign contractual cooperation arrangements at regional level which are supported and monitored by regional environmental and agricultural bodies. The purpose of these arrangements shall be to provide continuity and thereby optimise ecological focus areas while not impairing, in the process, valuable agricultural land.
Amendment 44 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) a payment for farmers observing agricultural practises beneficial for the climate andsustainable and beneficial agricultural practises that curb and mitigate climate change and protect the environment;
Amendment 48 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In order to avoid that the total amount of direct payments is higher than the ceilings set out in Annex III, Member States shall make a linear reduction in the amounts of all direct payments with the exception of direct payments granted under Regulations (EC) No 247/2006 and (EC) No 1405/2006. Moreover linear reductions shall not be made to direct payments for land on smaller islands situated within the administrative boundaries of island regions.
Amendment 49 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) where the eligible area of the holding for which direct payments are claimed or due to be granted before the reductions and exclusions provided for in Article 65 of Regulation (EU) No […] [HZR] is less than one0.3 hectares.
Amendment 51 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States concerned may decide not to apply paragraph 1 in the outermost regions and in the smaller Aegean Island, the smaller Aegean Islands and in smaller islands situated within the administrative boundaries of island regions.
Amendment 53 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) Rules on the signing of contractual cooperation arrangements by groups of farmers at regional level, which will be supported and monitored by regional environmental and agricultural bodies and whose purpose is to provide continuity and thereby optimise ecological focus areas while not impairing, in the process, valuable agricultural land.
Amendment 54 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Farmers entitled to a payment under the basic payment scheme referred to in Chapter 1 shall observe on their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25(2) at least two of the following agricultural practises beneficial for the climate and the environment:
Amendment 59 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Farmers shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter when they fall within at least one of the following categories: - farmers complying with the requirements laid down in Article 29 (1) of Regulation (EC) No° 834/2007 as regards organic farming shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter. - farmers who practise intensive farming with trees, tall-standing crops and/or vines. - farmers who are members of associations for the protection of agricultural products with a protected designation of origin and/or protected geographical indication.
Amendment 60 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 61 #
2011/0280(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29a To guarantee ‘green’ measures defined by Member States as applicable on their territory in order to furnish equivalent benefits for the environment and the climate, Member States, on the basis of their constitutional systems and having if applicable consulted the regions, shall make available to farmers further options, chosen on the basis of objectives and climatic and environmental peculiarities, from which a third mandatory measure shall be selected, subject to the Commission approving the aforesaid options. Member States shall notify the Commission of their decision by 1 August 2013. The Commission shall approve the package of measures adopted by Member States within two months of being notified thereof.
Amendment 34 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Article 174 of the Treaty provides that, in order to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, particular. Among those regions, particular attention should be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as island, cross-border and upland regions. Article 175 of the Treaty requires that the Union would support the achievement of these objectives by action it takes through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, the European Investment Bank and other instruments.
Amendment 38 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) Objective criteria should be fixed for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS)12. Particular attention should be paid to regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as island, cross-border and upland regions, although it must be borne in mind that the current NUTS classification does not necessarily reflect actual territorial specificities.
Amendment 172 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Article 174 of the Treaty provides that, in order to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, particular. Among the regions concerned particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross- border and mountain regions. Article 175 of the Treaty requires that the Union would support the achievement of these objectives by action it takes through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, the European Investment Bank and other instruments.
Amendment 207 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Commission should adopt by delegated act a Common Strategic Framework which translates the objectives of the Union into key actions for the CSF Funds, in orderIn order to achieve the objectives and targets of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, the Common Strategic Framework should coordinate and balance investment priorities, , with the thematic objectives specific to the Funds covered by the CPR set out in this Regulation. The aim of the Common Strategic Framework is to provide clearer strategic direction to the programming process at the level of Member States and regions. The Common Strategic Framework should facilitate sectoral and territorial coordination of Union intervention under the CSF Funds covered by the CPR and with other relevant Union policies and instruments. The Common Strategic Framework should be set out in an annex to this Regulation.
Amendment 228 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) A performance framework should be defined for each programme with a view to monitoring progress towards the objectives and targets set for each programme over the course of the programming period. The Commission should undertake a performance review in cooperation with the Member States in 2017 and 2019. A performance reserve should be foreseen and allocated in 2019 where milestones set in the performance framework have been attained. Due to their diversity and multi-country character, there should be no performance reserve for ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ programmes. In cases where the shortfall in the achievement of milestones or targets is significant, the Commission should be able to suspend payments to the programme or, at the end of the programming period, apply financial corrections, in order to ensure that the Union budget is not used in a wasteful or inefficient way.
Amendment 229 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) A performance framework should be defined for each programme with a view to monitoring progress towards the objectives and targets set for each programme over the course of the programming period. The Commission should undertake a performance review in cooperation with the Member States in 2017 and 2019. A performance reserve should be foreseen and allocated in 2019 where milestones set in the performance framework have been attained. Due to their diversity and multi-country character, there should be no performance reserve for 'European Territorial Cooperation' programmes. In cases where the shortfall in the achievement of milestones or targets is significant, the Commission should be able to suspend paycommitments to the programme or, at the end of the programming period, apply financial corrections, in order to ensure that the Union budget is not used in a wasteful or inefficient way.
Amendment 239 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Establishing a closer link between cohesion policy and the economic governance of the Union will ensure that the effectiveness of expenditure under the CSF Funds covered by the CPR is underpinned by sound economic policies and that the CSF Funds covered by the CPR can, if necessary, be redirected to addressing the economic problems a country is facing. This process has to be gradual, starting with amendments to the Partnership Contract and to the programmes in support of Council recommendations to address macroeconomic imbalances and social and economic difficulties. Where, despite the enhanced use of CSF Funds, a Member State fails to take effective action in the context of the economic governance process, the Commission should have the right to suspend all or part of the payments and commitments. Decisions on suspensions should be proportionate and effective, taking into account the impact of the individual programmes for addressing the economic and social situation in the relevant Member State and previous amendments to the Partnership Contract. When deciding on suspensions, the Commission should also respect equality of treatment between Member States, taking into account in particular the impact of the suspension on the economy of the Member State concerned. The suspensions should be lifted and funds be made available again to the Member State concerned as soon as the Member State takes the necessary action.
Amendment 274 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) In accordance with the principles of shared management, Member States and regional and local authorities should have the primary responsibility, through their management and control systems, for the implementation and control of the operations in programmes. In order to strengthen the effectiveness of the control over the selection and implementation of operations and the functioning of the management and control system, the functions of the managing authority should be specified.
Amendment 296 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) Objective criteria should be fixed for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) Special attention should be paid to regions which suffer from serious and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as regions with very low population density and island, cross- border and mountain regions, taking into account the fact that these territorial characteristics do not necessarily correspond to the breakdown currently proposed by the NUTS classification.
Amendment 301 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
Recital 58
Amendment 303 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
Recital 58
Amendment 350 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 90
Recital 90
(90) TWith regard to all of the Funds covered by the CPR, the Commission should be empowered to adopt, by means of implementing acts, as regards all CSF Funds, decisions approving the Partnership Contracts, decisions on the allocation of the performance reserve, decisions suspending payments linked to Member States' economic policies, and, in the case of decommitment, decisions to amend decisions adopting programmes; and as regards the Funds, decisions identifying the regions and Member States fulfilling the Investment for growth and jobs criteria, decisions setting out the annual breakdown of commitment appropriations to the Member States, decisions setting out the amount to be transferred from each Member State's CF allocation to the Connecting Europe Facility, decisions setting out the amount to be transferred from each Member State's Structural Funds allocation for food for deprived people, decisions adopting and amending operational programmes, decisions on major projects, decisions on joint action plans, decisions suspending payments and decisions on financial corrections.
Amendment 403 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the Partnership Contract and each programme respectively, athe Member States and local and regional authorities shall organise a partnership with the following partners:
Amendment 412 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) other competent regional, local, urban and other public authorities;
Amendment 420 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) bodies representing civil society, including environmental partners, non- governmental organisations, which include non-profit organisations that promote social inclusion, and bodies responsible for promoting equality and non- discrimination.
Amendment 436 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Code of Good Conduct will define, a number of partnership criteria that will be part of the Partnership Contract. These partnership criteria will cover following minimum specifications: (a) description of the partner institutions that form the formal partnership; (b) the cooperation procedure with the competent national, regional and local institutions, ensuring binding voting rights in partnership decisions, including changes of the operational programme; (c) description of the formal consultation procedure of the partner institutions in the drafting of national guidance notes and supplementary implementing rules; (e) description of the stakeholders involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the programmes; (f) transparency of the procedures and the relevant documents concerning the Development and Investment Partnership Contract and the operational programmes.
Amendment 439 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. These criteria shall be verified ex ante, as well as be subject to annual reporting by the Member States to the Commission.
Amendment 486 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
Article 20 – paragraph 4
Amendment 489 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 6
6) protecting the environmenteserving and enhancing the environment and cultural heritage, and promoting resource efficiency;
Amendment 504 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) investing in education, skills and, lifelong learning and culture;
Amendment 512 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 11
11) enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration; providing strategic orientation for territorial development within the framework of the Europe 2020 Strategy at all levels of government via the Union’s territorial agenda.
Amendment 532 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
Part 2 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
d) priority areas for cross-border, trans- national and inter-regional cooperation activities for each of the CSF Funds, where appropriate, taking account of macro- regional and sea basin strategies;
Amendment 540 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 1
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 142 on the Common Strategic Framework within 3 months of the adoption of this Regulationon Strategic Framework is set out in Annex [X].
Amendment 544 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 2
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 2
Where there are major changes in the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, the Commission shall review and, where appropriate, adopt, by delegated act in accordance with Article 142, a revised Common Strategic Frameworkmay submit a proposal to review the Common Strategic Framework or the European Parliament and the Council may ask the Commission to submit such a proposal.
Amendment 553 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall draw up aThe Partnership Contract shall be drawn up for the period between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 inclusive.
Amendment 555 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In Member States where, under national legislation or administrative provision, the regions and local authorities are involved in implementing the operational programmes, they shall be fully involved in drawing up the Partnership Contract.
Amendment 558 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 2
Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The Partnership Contract shall be drawn up by Member States in cooperation with the partners, as referred to in Article 5. The Partnership Contract shall be prepared in dialogue with the Commission4(4) and Article 5 in dialogue with the Commission. In Member States where other public authorities fulfil the role of owners of the operational programmes, they shall participate fully in drawing up the Partnership Contract.
Amendment 599 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) the arrangements to ensure an integrated approach to the use of the CSF Funds covered by the CPR, for the territorial development of urban, rural, coastal and fisheries areas and areas with particular territorial features, in particular the implementation arrangements for Articles 28, 29 and 99, accompanied, where appropriate, by athe list of the cities to participate in the urban development platform referred to in Article 8 of the ERDF Regulationcriteria for the designation of functional urban areas;
Amendment 654 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 16 – paragraph 1
Part 2 – article 16 – paragraph 1
Member States shall concentrate support, in accordance with the Fund-specific rules and in full agreement with the regional authorities, on actions bringing the greatest added value, in relation to the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, and which addressing the challenges identified in the country- specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the relevant Council recommendations adopted under 148(42) of the Treaty, andwhile taking into account national and regional needs.
Amendment 666 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 2
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall assess whether the applicable ex , where applicable as directly associated with a thematic objective/priority of the Partnership Agreement/programme, assess whether the ex-ante conditionalities are fulfilled.
Amendment 679 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 5
Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities in the framework of its assessment of the Partnership Contract and programmes. It may decide, when adopting a programme, to suspend all or part of interim payments to the programme pending the satisfactory completion of actions to fulfil an ex ante conditionality. The failure to complete actions to fulfil an ex ante conditionality by the deadline set out in the programme shall constitute a basis for suspending paycommitments by the Commission.
Amendment 694 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 18
Part 2 – article 18
Amendment 706 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 2 – article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where the review of the results performed in 2017 and 2019 shows that the fundamental milestones set out for 2016 and 2018 have not been achieved for the programmes at the level of priorities, the Commission shall make recommendations to the Member State concerned and where applicable shall implement technical support for the managing authorities.
Amendment 708 #
Amendment 728 #
Amendment 747 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 2 – article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall support the possibility of multi-fund operational programmes and to this end shall undertake to adopt any measure which will make the setting up and implementation of these programmes subject to the proportionality principle.
Amendment 774 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 24 – paragraph 5
Part 2 – article 24 – paragraph 5
5. Each programme, except those where technical assistance is undertaken under a specific programme, shall set out the indicative amount of support to be used for climate change objectives.objectives relating to climate change, social inclusion and reduction of poverty;
Amendment 802 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 28 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 2 – article 28 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) community-led, by local action groups composed of representatives of public and private local socio-economic interests, where at the decisionmaking level neither the public sector nor any single interest group shall represent more than 49 % of the voting rights, save for exceptions contained in Operational Programmes in the case of institutionalised structures for existing local development and which allow different voting methods;
Amendment 964 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 44 – paragraph 3
Part 2 – article 44 – paragraph 3
3. The annual implementation report submitted in 2017 shall set out and assess the information set out in paragraph 2 and progress towards achieving the objectives of the programme, including the contribution of the CSF Funds to changes in result indicators, when evidence is available from evaluations. It shall also assess the implementation of actions to take into account the principles set out in Articles 6, 7 and 8 and report on support used for climate change targets and the actions taken to achieve the objectives of reducing poverty.
Amendment 980 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
Part 2 – article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) progress towards achievement of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, in particular in respect of the milestones set out for each programme in the performance framework and the support used for climate change objectivesobjectives for climate change and reducing poverty;
Amendment 1156 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 74 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Part 2 – article 74 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The payment deadline for an interim payment claim may be interrupted by the authorising officer by delegation within the meaning of the Financial Regulation for a maximum period of ninesix months if:
Amendment 1208 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Part 3 – article 82 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. 6 In 2015, the Commission shall review the eligibility of Regions under the various categories referred to in point 2. Those regions where, due to the recession, the GDP per capita has fallen by at least 5% between the above reference period and the period 2010 to 2012 will benefit from supplementary funding corresponding to their new situation.
Amendment 1227 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) 0,29 % (i.e., a total of EUR 925 680 000)e) XXX€ as additional funding for the outermost regions identified in Article 349 of the Treaty and the NUTS level 2 regions fulfilling the criteria laid down in Article 2 of Protocol No 6for which the level of support should correspond to the Treaty of Accession of Austria, Finlanlities of OMR-related hand Swedenicaps.
Amendment 1231 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) f) XXX€ as additional funding for the NUTS level 2 regions fulfillingthe criteria laid down in Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the Treaty of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden.
Amendment 1233 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e b (new)
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) XXX€ as additional funding , to be allocated to areas beset bypermanent and severe geographic handicaps in the framework of Operational Programmes undertaken under article 10 of the ERDF Regulation; such areas being those defined by Article 111§4, excluding those already mentioned above under e) and f).
Amendment 1237 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
All regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007-2013 period was less than 75% of the average of the EU-25 for the reference period but whose GDP per capita is above 75% of the GDP average of the EU-27 shall receive an allocation under the Structural Funds equal to at least two thirdsnot exceeding 50% of their 2007-2013 allocation.
Amendment 1374 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii
iii) the indicative list of cities and functional areas where integrated actions for sustainable urban development will be implemented,. This list should be drawn up in partnership with local and regional authorities, with due attention to the institutional systems of each Member State in order to ensure fair access for each local authority which wishes to implement integrated urban measures, to the indicative annual allocation of the ERDF support for these actions, including the resources delegated to cities for management under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No […] [ERDF] and the indicative annual allocation of ESF support for integrated actions;
Amendment 1421 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point iii bis (new)
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point iii bis (new)
iii a) a description of the specific measures taken to achieve the EU objective of poverty reduction by promoting the social inclusion of disadvantaged groups of people and of reducing inequality throughout the European Union.
Amendment 1425 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 88 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 88 – paragraph 2
2. The ERDF and the ESF may finance, in a complementary manner and subject to a limit of 510 % of Union funding for each priority axis of an operational programme, a part of an operation for which the costs are eligible for support from the other Fund on the basis of eligibility rules applied to that Fund, provided that they are necessary for the satisfactory implementation of the operation and are directly linked to it.
Amendment 1516 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 100 – paragraph 1 – point f bis (new)
Part 3 – article 100 – paragraph 1 – point f bis (new)
(fa) actions aimed at combating poverty and promoting social inclusion of disadvantaged groups of people;
Amendment 1531 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 101 – paragraph 3 – point e
Part 3 – article 101 – paragraph 3 – point e
e) the specific actions taken to promote equality between men and women and to prevent discrimination, including accessibility for disabled persons, and the arrangements implemented to ensure the integration of the gender perspective in the operational programme and operations, as well as specific measures adopted to combat poverty and promote social inclusion of vulnerable groups of people;
Amendment 1573 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 105 – paragraph 1 bis (new)
Part 3 – article 105 – paragraph 1 bis (new)
1a. Awareness-raising actions can also be organised by European institutions and advisory bodies in order to mirror the way in which cohesion policy functions, as well as its added value for the EU
Amendment 1631 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 3 bis (new)
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 3 bis (new)
3 a) reducing poverty and promoting social inclusion of vulnerable groups of people, especially through integrated approaches to active inclusion;
Amendment 1632 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) Small island Member States eligible under the Cohesion Fund, and other islands except those on which the capital of a Member State is situated or which have a fixed link to the mainland;
Amendment 1633 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c – indent 1 (new)
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c – indent 1 (new)
- In such areas, the ceiling of co- financing rates set in Article 110.3 may be increased by 10% up to a maximum ceiling of 80%.
Amendment 50 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2
Article 2
The ERDF shall contribute to the financing of support which aims to reinforce economic, social and territorial cohesion by redressing the main regional imbalances through support for the development and structural adjustment of regional economies, including the conversion of declining industrial regions and regions lagging behind, taking into account the difficulties affecting areas with permanent serious natural or demographic handicaps.
Amendment 65 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In more developed regions, the ERDF shall not support investments in infrastructure providing basic services to citizens in the areas of environment, transport, and ICT.
Amendment 69 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) at least 80% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to the thematic objectives set out in points 1, 3, 4 and 47 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […...]/2012 [CPR];
Amendment 77 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) at least 50% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to the thematic objectives set in out in points 1, 3, 4 and 47 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR].;
Amendment 83 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The ERDF shall support the following investment priorities within the thematic objectives set out in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR], taking into account regional needs and potential as described in the Partnership Contracts:
Amendment 104 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
By way of derogation from points (a) and (aa), all NUTS 2 regions and NUTS 3 regions consisting solely of one or more islands shall be considered less developed regions for the purposes of this article.
Amendment 108 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
(7) promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures, especially in remote and island regions:
Amendment 109 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of the list of cities to participate in the urban development plommon indicatforms. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control, by Member States, of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
Amendment 120 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The ERDF shall contribute to the financing of support which aims to reinforce economic, social and territorial cohesion by redressing the main regional imbalances through support for the development and structural adjustment of regional economies, including the conversion of declining industrial regions and regions lagging behind and also addressing the difficulties affecting territories suffering from serious and permanent natural or demographic handicaps.
Amendment 129 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
(d) developing comprehensive, high- quality and interoperable railway systems, combined with possible financing for the purchase of rolling-stock for public transport;
Amendment 134 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d a (new)
(da) developing sustainable sea or air transport systems to help open up islands to the greatest extent possible to passenger and goods traffic;
Amendment 149 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) point (a) shall not constitute an obstacle to the selection of cities in remote or island regions or cities whose population is significantly lower than that of the large urban agglomerations of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 157 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – row 10 a (new)
Annex – row 10 a (new)
Tourism Visits Number of visits to supported attractions EUR Volume of investment in smart and sustainable mobility
Amendment 160 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) investments in accessible social, health and, educational, cultural, sport, and tourism infrastructure;
Amendment 178 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i bis (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i bis (new)
(i a) investment to promote tourism including maritime tourist activity and to protect artistic and cultural heritage
Amendment 223 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In more developed regions, the ERDF shall not support investments in infrastructure providing basic services to citizens in the areas of environment, transport, and ICT.
Amendment 227 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 255 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) at least 80% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to three of the thematic objectives set out in points 1, 3 and 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] ; and
Amendment 260 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) at least 80 % of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to the thematic objectives set out in points 1, 3, 4 and 47 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR];
Amendment 267 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) at least 20% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to one of the thematic objectives set out in point 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] ;
Amendment 285 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) at least 50% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to three of the thematic objectives set in out in point 1, 3 and 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] .
Amendment 287 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) at least 50 % of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to thematic objectives set out in points 1, 3, 4 and 47 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR];
Amendment 297 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) at least 6% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to one of the thematic objectives set out in point 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR].
Amendment 323 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The ERDF shall support the following investment priorities within the thematic objectives set out in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR], in accordance with regional requirements and potential as described in the Partnership Contracts:
Amendment 341 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) promoting business R&I investment, product and service development, technology transfer, social innovation and, cultural and creative industries, public service applications, demand stimulation, networking, clusters and open innovation through smart specialisation;
Amendment 518 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
(c) protecting, promoting and developing cultural heritage and sustainable tourism;
Amendment 528 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
(e) action to improve the urban environment, including regeneration of deprived urban and outlying areas and brownfield sites and reduction of air pollution;
Amendment 530 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
(e) action to improve the urban environment, including regeneration of brownfield sites, rehabilitation of cultural infrastractures and reduction of air pollution;
Amendment 550 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
(7) promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures, especially in peripheral and island regions:
Amendment 579 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
(d) develop comprehensive, high quality and interoperable railway systems, as well as the possibility of funding the purchase of rolling stock used for public transport;
Amendment 589 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d a (new)
(d a) (e) developing sustainable maritime or air transport systems that are likely to help islands optimise their accessibility for passengers and freight alike.
Amendment 662 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) investing in education, skills and, lifelong learning and culture by developing education and training infrastructure and promoting cultural heritage;
Amendment 689 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 722 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 733 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) c) the provisions set out in point a) should not prevent the selection of cities situated in peripheral or island regions where the size of their population is significantly lower than those of the Member State's big metropolitan areas.
Amendment 748 #
2011/0275(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Operational programmes co-financed by the ERDF covering areas with severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps referred to in Article 111(4) of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] shall pay particular attention to addressing the specific difficulties of those areas. The specific additional allocation for areas beset by permanent and severe geographic handicaps shall be used to enable these territories to alleviate such constraints, to improve their attractiveness for people and for industries, and to exploit their assets. It will support actions in the following fields: (a) all thematic objectives set out in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No [...]/2012[CPR]; (b) start-up aid for transport services; (c) cooperation actions not covered by Regulation (EU) N° [...]/2012 on specific provisions for support from the European Regional Development Fund towards the European territorial cooperation goal.
Amendment 73 #
2011/0274(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – row 26 a (new)
Annex – row 26 a (new)
Tourism EUR Volume of investment in smart and sustainable mobility
Amendment 9 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Cross-border cooperation should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions (such as poor accessibility, inappropriate business environment, lack of networks among local and regional administrations, research and innovation and take-up of information and communication technologies, environmental pollution, risk prevention, negative attitudes towards neighbouring country citizens) and exploit the untapped potentials in the border area (development of cross-border research and innovation facilities and clusters, cross-border labour market integration, cooperation among universities or health centres, and development of specific projects in the tourism sector), while enhancing the cooperation process for the purpose of the overall harmonious development of the Union. In the case of any cross-border programme between Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF shall also contribute to promoting social and economic stability in the regions concerned, notably by actions to promote cohesion between communities.
Amendment 18 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Consistent with the goal of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, the Structural Funds should provide a more integrated and inclusive approach to tackling local problems, such as the lack of infrastructure support, the decline of traditional production methods and the distance from markets. In order to strengthen this approach, support from the ERDF support in border regions should be coordinated with support from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund(EMFF) and should, where appropriate, involve European groupings of territorial cooperation set up under Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) where local development figures among their objectives.
Amendment 32 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point a – point iv a (new)
Article 6 – point a – point iv a (new)
iv a) carrying out and promoting actions in the tourism sector intended to develop the areas concerned;
Amendment 35 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – point b
Article 6 – point b
b) under transnational cooperation: development and implementation of macro-regional and sea-basin strategies (within the thematic objective of enhancing institutional capacity and, an efficient public administration and targeted actions in the tourism sector).
Amendment 36 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Community-led local development under Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No./2012 [CPR] may be implemented in cross-border cooperation programmes, provided that the local development group is composed of local representatives of at least two countries, of which one is a Member State.
Amendment 60 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 86 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
19. Consistent with the goal of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, the Structural Funds should provide a more integrated and inclusive approach to tackling local problems such as the lack of infrastructure support, the decline of traditional labour productions and the distance of markets. In order to strengthen this approach, support from the ERDF support in border regions should be coordinated with support from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund(EMFF) and should, where appropriate, involve European groupings of territorial cooperation set up under Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)20 where local development figures among their objectives.
Amendment 118 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For cross-border cooperation, the regions to be supported shall be the NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along all internal and external land borders other than those covered by programmes under the external financial instruments of the Union, and all NUTS level 3 regions of the Union along maritime borders separated by a maximum of 150 km, without prejudice to potential adjustments needed to ensure the coherence and continuity of cooperation programme areas established for the 2007- 2013 programming period. The above- mentioned maximum limit of 150 km shall not apply to island regions within the limits of their sea basin area, so as to promote cooperation actions based on a common strategy within their functional area.
Amendment 221 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
4a. Creation and promotion of tourism interventions in line with the development of the areas concerned;
Amendment 249 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) under transnational cooperation: development and implementation of macro-regional and sea-basin strategies (within the thematic objective of enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration and of targeted interventions in the tourism sector).
Amendment 268 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
(ii) where appropriate, a planned integrated approach to the territorial development of urban, rural, coastal areas and areas with particular territorial features such as those suffering from geographic, demographic or natural handicaps, in particular the implementation arrangements for Articles 28 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No./2012 [CPR];
Amendment 306 #
2011/0273(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Community-led local development under Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No./2012 [CPR] may be implemented in cross-border cooperation programmes, provided that the local development group is composed of local representatives of at least two countries, of which one is a Member State.
Amendment 117 #
2011/0268(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) AProfessional adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change;
Amendment 147 #
2011/0268(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) Promoting the social economy and social enterprises and cooperative businesses;
Amendment 182 #
2011/0268(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States and regional authorities shall pursue thematic concentration according to the following modalities:
Amendment 16 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 and more in particular bovine identification and voluntary beef labelling were listed as "information obligations with special importance in terms of the burdens they impose on businesses" in the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on an "Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU" .
Amendment 26 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Different types of electronic identifiers, such as ruminal boluses, electronic ear tags, and injectable transponders may be used to individually identify animals in addition to the conventional ear tags provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000. It is therefore appropriate to broaden the scope of the means of identification provided for in that Regulation in order to enable the use of electronic identification.
Amendment 31 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Making EID mandatory throughout the Union may have economically adverse effects on certain operatorwould guarantee exemplary food safety levels for EU citizens. It is therefore appropriate that a voluntary regimetransition period for the introduction of EID is established in order to use up the stock of traditional ear tags. Under such a regime, EID would quickly be chosen by keepers that are likely to have immediate economic benefits.
Amendment 32 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 38 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 provides that the competent authority is to issue a passport for each animal which has to be identified in accordance with that Regulation. This causes a considerable administrative burden for the Member States. The computerised databases established by Member States sufficiently ensure traceability of domestic movements of bovine animals. Passports should therefore be issued only for animals intended for intra-Union trade. Once the data exchange between national computerised databases is operational, the requirement of issuing such passports should no longer apply for animals intended for intra-Union trade. In all cases, the current passport, whether the current paper version or the future electronic version, should include the gene mapping of the sample used for reference, to be carried out when the EID is registered or introduced.
Amendment 49 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Section II of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 lays down rules for a voluntary beef labelling system which provide for the approval of certain labelling specifications by the competent authority of the Member State. The administrative burden and the costs incurred by Member States and economic operators in applying this system are not proportionate to the benefits of the system. That Section should therefore be deleted.
Amendment 58 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Amendment 64 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 4b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 66 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 4c – paragraph 2
Article 4c – paragraph 2
Amendment 90 #
2011/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 14
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Articles 16 - 18
Articles 16 - 18
Amendment 151 #
2011/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) “daily workcontrol period” means the period comprising the driving time, all other periods of work, the periods of availability, breaks in work and periods of rest not exceeding nine hours.
Amendment 258 #
2011/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. A transport undertaking shall be liable for infringements against this Regulation committed by drivers of the undertaking, consignor, freight forwarder, tour operator, contractor and driver employment agency shall be liable for contractually agreed transport time schedules not respecting this Regulation. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to hold transport undertakings fully liable, Member States may consider any evidence that the transport undertaking cannot reasonably be held responsible for the infringement committed.
Amendment 36 #
2011/0177(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 (new)
Paragraph 10 (new)
10. Welcomes, in this regard, the Commission proposal establishing a Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (COSME) (2014-2020); stresses in particular that strong support should be given for the specific allocations of EUR 131 million for the competitiveness of enterprises in the tourism sector;
Amendment 11 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A i (new)
Paragraph A i (new)
Amendment 12 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A j (new)
Paragraph A j (new)
Aj. whereas lower participation in general education and in the labour market lead to income inequalities and poverty for people with disabilities, as well as to social exclusion and isolation,
Amendment 13 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A k (new)
Paragraph A k (new)
Ak. whereas the rate of employment for people with disabilities is only around 50% while quality jobs ensure economic independence, foster personal achievement, and offer the best protection against poverty,
Amendment 14 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A l (new)
Paragraph A l (new)
Al. whereas in the 16-19 age group the rate of non-participation in education is 37 % for considerably restricted people, and 25 % for those restricted to some extent, against 17 % for those not restricted,
Amendment 42 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Highlights the need to provide inclusive education and lifelong learning to disabled pupils and students;
Amendment 43 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5e. Stresses the need to make the most of public awareness raising campaigns and to reorganise the information on disability that is collected through social surveys in the European Union;
Amendment 52 #
2010/2272(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses the need for people with disabilities to be able to benefit from social protection systems and poverty reduction programmes, disability-related assistance, public housing programmes and other enabling services, and retirement and benefit programmes;
Amendment 103 #
2010/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for determined efforts to harmonise road signs and road traffic rules by 2013 and for the driving side of the road to be standardised in all the Member States, in view of objective safety requirements;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission report of 18 January 2011 to the European Parliament and the Council, constituting the mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (COM(2011)0005), which maintains that substantial funding is needed in order to complete the satellite radio navigation infrastructure,
Amendment 4 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 16 February 2011 on practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period,
Amendment 15 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, under the Lisbon Treaty (Article 195), tourism has become a specific competence of the EU allowing the latter to support and complement actions within the Member States by encouraging the creation of an atmosphere that is conducive to developing tourism enterprises and fostering cooperation between Member States,
Amendment 25 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the basis for a EU tourism strategy lies firstly in a packet of specific measures solely concerning the tourism sector, and secondly, in a connection to other complementary sectors in order to achieve a system which genuinely promotes tourism; considers, moreover, that a precise assessment is needed of how measures in other sectors impact tourism;
Amendment 34 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes the view that European regions should cooperate more closely in an effort to enhance their attractiveness and their visibility and emphasise their characteristic features, in particular by developing regional tourism centres and by preparing specific programming agreements, not least with the aim of modernising tourist amenities;
Amendment 36 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the Commission, in implementing the Europe 2020 strategy, to draw up a multiannual tourism plan calling on the Member States and the regions to establish a programming instrument for the same period;
Amendment 39 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that tourism should be regarded as part and parcel of the EU’s industrial policy and asserts once more that reinvigorating tourism provides an important stimulusis a strategic and vital objective for employment in the various Member States;
Amendment 41 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Amendment 42 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to promote a specific innovation incubator for businesses in the tourism sector;
Amendment 45 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Agrees with the Commission’s proposal that a ‘European label’ be developed in conjunction with the Member States and with national tourism agencies, under which, while respecting territorial diversitand highlighting the specific features of the territory, the concept of Europe as a whole should be promoted worldwide as a tourist destination;
Amendment 53 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the ‘European heritage label’ initiative as a tool giving prominence to some of the important sites in the history of European integration; stresses the need for coordination between this initiative and the UNESCO heritage sites in order to avoid overlapping that has no added value;
Amendment 65 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers it advisable, while respecting the EU's rights and duty to control entry across its own borders, for the European institutions' and the Member States' consciousness of these markets to be heightened so that visa procedures are coordinated and simplified, with consideration given to establishing common consular desks across the EU to ensure that visa procedures are implemented on time and bureaucratic costs reduced; to this end, further to the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), calls on the Commission to consider the possibility to deploy the EU delegation offices in the world in order to issue touristic visas in collaboration with the National embassies of the Member States;
Amendment 78 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the need to foster technological development in SMEs so that they may more effectively market their products and promote destinations; urges the Commission to create an ‘ICT and Tourism’ platform, launching a specific pilot project by the end of 2011 to boost the participation of micro-enterprises and SMEs in the digital supply chain, following on from the experience of other sectors such as textiles, transport and logistics and the automobile industry; calls on the Member States, moreover, to develop high-speed internet throughout their territory in order to enable advanced services to be developed and operators to become interoperable;
Amendment 79 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the need to foster technological development in micro- enterprises and SMEs so that they may more effectively market their products and promote destinations; urges the Commission to create an ‘ICT and Tourism’ platform, launching a specific pilot project by the end of 2011 to boost the participation of micro-enterprises and SMEs in the digital supply chain, following on from the experience of other sectors such as textiles, transport and logistics and the automobile industry;
Amendment 90 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that the potential of the European Travel Commission'’s (ETC) web portal www.visiteurope.com should be developed to maximise its availability and full accessibility (information in all EU official languages and the principal non- EU languages, use of formats accessible by people with sensory disabilities) and make it a genuine European tourism platform, with easy access to national, regional and local tourism portals in the individual Member States; considers, moreover, that the portal should give greater visibility to the system of European Quality Tourism Label, to best practices and to initiatives, such as Calypso, NECSTouR and EDEN;
Amendment 91 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that the potential of the European Travel Commission’s (ETC) web portal www.visiteurope.com should be developed to maximise its availability and full accessibility (information in all EU official languages and the principal non- EU languages, use of formats accessible by people with sensory disabilities through all modern technological applications) and make it a genuine European tourism platform, with easy access to national, regional and local tourism portals in the individual Member States;
Amendment 144 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Urges the Commission to promote the use of more sustainable means of transport and to pay particular attention tofacilitate connections with islands, rural areas and mountainous areas and, more generally, with less accessible destinations;
Amendment 163 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the Commission’s readiness to diversify the types of tourism available; stresses, in particular, the importance of the collaboration already underway with the Council to promote cultural, historical, religious and environmental tourism by means of themed routes which not only exploit our continent’s historical and cultural roots, but also contribute to the development of an alternative style of tourism, one that is sustainable and accessible to all; considers that the use of sustainable means of transport, including cycling and sailing, should be encouraged in connection with several routes;
Amendment 164 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the Commission’s readiness to diversify the types of tourism available; stresses, in particular, the importance of the collaboration already underway with the Council to promote cultural, historical, religious and, environmental and landscape tourism by means of themed routes which not only exploit our continent’s historical and cultural roots, but also contribute to the development of an alternative style of tourism, one that is sustainable and accessible to all; considers that the use of sustainable means of transport, including cycling, should be encouraged in connection with several routes;
Amendment 171 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Takes the view that in order to differentiate European tourism from that of other countries or continents, it is crucial to link the traditional tourism sector with what the territory has to offer in terms of products and services and tangible and intangible assets;
Amendment 176 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Considers that the Commission and the Council of Europe should continue to support the development of routes that highlight the European identity through circuits linking symbolic sites in Europe, such as cathedrals, castles, universities, archaeological sites and industrial settlements;
Amendment 178 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to take all appropriate measures to safeguard European heritage;
Amendment 190 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Points out that the development of new inland waterways can contribute to the sustainable development of cultural tourism, nature tourism and recreational tourism;
Amendment 207 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support, under an integrated maritime policy, the development of port infrastructure, an essential factor in cruise ship tourism which, despite the recentmaritime passenger transport and sports and cruisis, is a growth sector and in sports tourisme ship tourism, calling on the Member States to lift any restrictions they might have;
Amendment 215 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Takes note of the continuing growth in health tourism and in spa tourism in particular; calls on the Commission, in view of the fact that there are a variety of Community rules covering spa-tourism issues, to consider the possibility of tabling a single legislative proposal on spa tourism in order to give the sector a controlled organic structure encouraging its competitiveness; stresses the importance of new rulesthe new legislation on cross-border healthcare for the further promotion of health tourism;
Amendment 233 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Calls on the Commission to draw up an organic plan to overcome issues relating to the seasonal nature of tourism and to allow economically prosperous areas and less well-known and/or accessible areas to converge;
Amendment 240 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Calls on the Commission to promote also so-called VFR tourism (Visiting Friends and Relatives) as an important way of enhancing integration in European culture;
Amendment 248 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Asks that a specific tourism programme, targeting SMEmicro, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular, be established in the 2014-2020 financial perspectives, encouraging partnerships between firms and public-private partnerships on pan-European tourism projects;
Amendment 260 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
Paragraph 47 a (new)
47a. Calls on the Commission to submit an integrated tourism strategy by the end of 2012;
Amendment 262 #
2010/2206(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
Paragraph 48 a (new)
48a. Encourages the Commission, in the context of the implementation plan, to set as soon as possible specific timings to achieve all the actions and targets; asks Member States to cooperate by assessing the implementation of each strategy;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Requests that a report be attached to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2180(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Requests that a report be attached to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2177(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Requests that a report be attached to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2176(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Requests that a report be attached to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 37 #
2010/2154(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the European Commission to conduct a precautionary in-depth evaluation, via a suitable study or impact assessment, of the health risks for passengers and airport staff arising from the use of body scanners;
Amendment 64 #
2010/2154(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Proposes, more specifically, that the Commission should revise the rules on the use of security scanners to ensure that the provisions on the protection of health safety, transparency and fundamental rights are adapted to technological progressproperly upheld by means of an anticipatory report listing in full the risks arising from the use of such devices; calls on the Commission moreover to draw up a report indicating the current locations of operational body scanners, scanner types and modes of operation, identifying the manufacturers and fitters (as well as the professional bodies to which they belong) and giving a comprehensive financial breakdown of the total costs arising from their use;
Amendment 5 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 c (new)
Citation 26 c (new)
- whereas the WHO called an end to the state of alert concerning H1N1 influenza only in August 2010 (statement by the WHO Director-General of 10 August 20101),
Amendment 18 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the criteria for defining a ‘pandemic’, adopted by the WHO in 2009 in its guidance document on ‘Pandemic influenza preparedness and response’ and based solely on the propagation of the virus while discounting the severity of the infection, distorted the meaning of the word ‘pandemic’ and triggered a false alarm worldwide, with thled authorities at EU level and in the Member States to take inappropriate alarmism giving rise to inappropriate public health decisions and a disproportionate response among the public and administrations of the European Union and its Member Statesnd disproportionate public health decisions and gave rise to public alarmism,
Amendment 33 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the exaggerated costs arising from the management of this crisis in the Member States are primarily a directto some extent a consequence of the EU’s lack of independence and critical acumen in relation to the risk evaluation conducted by the WHO,
Amendment 36 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the expenditure committed by the Member States to the response plans drawn up is mainly in connection with the purchase of vast quantities of vaccines, and antiviral treatments, and whereas purchasing procedures have led to serious concerns in terms of transparency and public procurement rules compliance in several Member States
Amendment 62 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 73 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the serious accusations of conflicts of interest involving consultants/experts working on behalf of the European institutions need to be investigated in greater detail,
Amendment 109 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to supply details of the following: (1) the number of doses of vaccine ultimately purchased by each Member State; (2) total expenditure on the purchase of vaccines in each Member State; (3) the number of doses of vaccine actually used in each Member State; (4) the number of doses of vaccine which were, respectively, placed in storage, the subject of reimbursement, and sold to other Member States;
Amendment 110 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for steps to be taken to determine whether or not the European Union was involved in funding the purchase of doses of vaccine and/or in commissioning studies or research in this area;
Amendment 137 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for such conflicts of interest to be brought to Parliament's attention by means of an internal investigation carried out by the Committee on Budgetary Control with a view to determining whether payments to the aforementioned experts were made in a correct and transparent manner and whether the procedures normally employed by the European institutions to forestall such conflicts of interest were followed;
Amendment 141 #
2010/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls foron the publication ofCommission to publish the names, roles and potential conflicts of interest of senior officials who are members of informal groups such as the EU’s Health Security Committee, the Health Emergency Operational Facility (HEOF) and the ‘vaccines’ task force;
Amendment 6 #
2010/2142(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Requests that a report be attached to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2142(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls on the Commission, in the interests of greater transparency and to firmly establish the principle of the personal liability of officials who manage public monies, to prepare a study, based on the experiences in Member States, on the feasibility of introducing, within the EU institutions, the notion of liability for losses to the budget or, in other words, the personal pecuniary liability of any official who, through his actions or failure to take action, has occasioned financial losses to the European Union;
Amendment 16 #
2010/2139(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to perform a study with a view to the introduction of a specific ‘balance sheet of environmental impacts’ which illustrates both the estimated and the final positive impact of each territorial project on the environment;
Amendment 14 #
2010/2114(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 10 bis (new)
Point 10 bis (new)
10a. Encourages joint policies for the remediation of land affected by chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear contamination, so that the soil and land can be restore to use as swiftly as possible, thereby reducing the risks to health and the environment;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that food security is essential to the European Union and that continuous efforts are needed to guarantee it at Community and world level, given that according to FAO data, an increase in the world population of between 7 and 9.1 billion will necessitate a 70% increase in food supply by 2050;
Amendment 3 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the rights of all the Member States to food sovereignty and food security isare essential to the European Union and that continuous efforts are needed to guarantee it at Community and world levelensure that those rights are guaranteed;
Amendment 6 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Expresses deep concern at the volatility of food prices; believes that instruments that make it possible to speculate on food products should be banned;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises that food security and food safety are two complementary concepts and stresses that respecting food sovereignty constitutes an important contribution to guarantee food security which goes always hand in hand with the safeguarding of high standards of food safety;
Amendment 11 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is deeply concerned at the effects of the recent economic and financial crisis, which, despite shrinking financial resources in all economic sectors, with severe repercussions for the food chain; should not result in reduced vigilance over the safety of food products; calls on the Commission to strengthen existing programmes to guarantee food safety in the Member States;
Amendment 14 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that food products must be affordable for consumers, condemns the agreements undermining competition and the unfair practices entered into by large- scale retailers and calls for measures to be taken to end such practices and ensurcurb speculation so as to guarantee transparency in the way in which final consumer prices for food products are formed;
Amendment 19 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need to halt and reverse the decline in the diversity of cultivated plant species and varieties and the erosion of the genetic basis on which human and animal nutrition depends; urges that action be taken to promote the effective use of traditional agricultural varieties specific to certain regions, combating the export-led standardisation of agricultural production and intensive models of agriculture that result from current agricultural and trade policies, of which the CAP is an example, and encouraging sustainable small and medium scale production linked to local and regional markets and consumption;
Amendment 20 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Is concerned that 2008, the year of the global food crisis, was also the greatest wheat-producing year in world history; emphasizes the role played by large institutional investors, such as hedge funds and investment banks in influencing commodities price indexes, and calls for bolder European action to restrict speculation, particularly with regards to food commodity derivatives;
Amendment 21 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 24 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Commends the initiative taken by the World Bank at the 2010 United Nations Summit on the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to increase its support for the agricultural sector, so as to boost incomes, employment and food security particularly in low- income areas;
Amendment 26 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 28 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls the conclusions of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), performed under the aegis of the World Bank, which underline that modern biotechnologies are not the best adapted to the needs of food-producing agriculture and that the most effective way of improving food security, reducing poverty and enabling a majority of regions to regain self- sufficiency in food is to take into account local knowledge and promote the development of organic farming;
Amendment 31 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Given the expected increase in global food demand and the consequent pressure on natural resources, stresses the need to balance the requirements of food security with those of biodiversity conservation; notes that measures to address the urgent nature of environmental problems such as soil degradation, biodiversity loss, etc. arewhich is essential for maintaining the EU’s long- term agricultural productivity and food security;
Amendment 40 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that seed oligopolies have devastating effects on the sustainability of small-scale farming, fostering dependency on a limited number of corporations for the purchasing of seeds and specialized fertilizers;
Amendment 42 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the widespread action taken by thousands of farmers, environmental groups, scientists and citizens for the in- situ conservation and propagation of local genetic material; recalls further that the diversity of seeds adapted to local conditions is a necessary prerequisite for food security, especially in the face of climate change;
Amendment 44 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Asks for the introduction of specific support for urban agriculture as this will entail multiple benefits for food security, employment, environmental education, recreation and the urban climate;
Amendment 51 #
2010/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Takes the view that the common agricultural policy (CAP) after 2013 should properly reward EU farmers for their efforts in securing high-quality food supply while ensuring an efficient and sustainable use of natural resources;
Amendment 5 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Aichi biodiversity targets, particularly the commitment to protect 17% of terrestrial and inland water areas through effective conservation measures, integrated into the wider landscapes,
Amendment 10 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
Citation 12
– having regard to the Renewable Energy Directive (Directive 2009/28 EC); the ETS Directive (Directive 2009/29 EC), the Effort Sharing Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, the Commission Report on sustainability requirements for the use of solid and gaseous biomass source in electricity, heating and cooling (COM (2010)0011/SEC (2010)0065) and the results of the Public Consultation on the preparation of a report for a sustainability scheme for energy uses of biomass,
Amendment 13 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law,
Amendment 16 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
– having regard to Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market,
Amendment 68 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas the White Paper on Adaptation includes forests as one of the key areas of action stressing that the EU forestry strategy should be updated on climate-related aspects,
Amendment 69 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G c (new)
Recital G c (new)
Gc. whereas the enhancement of forest protective functions should form part of the EU and Member States strategies for civil protection, especially in the face of climate-related extreme phenomena such as fires and floods,
Amendment 87 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas a considerable number of forest fires are caused not by accidents but by acts of arson often carried out for ulterior motives,
Amendment 95 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas the ''EU policy options for the protection of European forests'' study financed by the Commission has identified and studied four policy options, covering continuation of the current approach, the open method of coordination, increased monitoring and the introduction of a forest framework directive,
Amendment 118 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the success of EU efforts to achieve global competitiveness for European forest- based industries;
Amendment 122 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and Member States to intensify efforts to achieve the environment and quality of life goals of the FAP, the implementation of which is currently lagging behindall the four objectives of the FAP according to the key recommendations in the Report of the Mid-term evaluation of the implementation of the EU Forest Action Plan;
Amendment 141 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to demonstrate their support for the Forest Europe process by making criteria and operational level guidelines mandatory within the European Union; considers further that such a commitment would prove to be a major boost for the Forest Europe process;
Amendment 149 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Advocates that active SFM should be made mandatory in the EU inand at the core of the clontext of five-g-term (e.g. 5-10 years) National Forest Programmes incorporating regional priorities and measurable targets and evaluation criteria;
Amendment 159 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for a strengthening of the link between NFPs and the FAP through structured reporting to the Standing Forestry Committee;
Amendment 160 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Stresses that Rural Development Plans (RDP) or Operational Programmes (OP) should not be considered as equivalent to National Forest Programmes;
Amendment 172 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Considers that long-term forest protection depends upon establishing or sustaining forest ecosystems with highly diverse tree composition, age and structure;
Amendment 211 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Urges the Commission to submit a legislative proposal prohibiting building on land cleared by fires proven to have resulted from arson;
Amendment 220 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission to present a legislative proposal for Forest Information taking into account climate threats and the need for harmonised and comparable data on forest cover, biodiversity, threats and land use, taking into account increased reporting needs in the context of the UNFCCC, CBD, and environmental accounts;
Amendment 231 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recalls that forests play a key role in the provision of socio-economic and environmental public goods;
Amendment 244 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Maintains that producer groups and public bodieublic bodies, forest owners, forest owner groups and other rural producers should be made eligible for forestry measures in the second pillar of the CAP;
Amendment 288 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls for the application of forest definitions whichbased on an ecological forest classification such as the one proposed by the EEA in 2007, so as to be able to differentiate between carbon-rich old forests, intensively managed monocultures and other forest types according to biomes;
Amendment 290 #
2010/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to work internationally to establish a new UN definition of forests which clarifies natural forest definitions on a biome basis and distinguishes between native forests and those dominated by tree monocultures and non- native species;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 a (new)
Citation 27 a (new)
- having regard to the Convention for the protection of the Mediterranean Sea against pollution and the protocols thereto,
Amendment 41 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Based on the findings of the external evaluation, the recommendations by the Administrative Board and the multi-annual strategy, some provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 should be clarified and updated. Furthermore, the Agency should receive a number of additional tasks reflecting the development of the maritime safety policy at EU and international level. Considerable screening and redeployment efforts are necessary to guarantee cost and budget efficiency. This should allow one third of additional staffing needs for new tasks to be covered through internal redeployment by the Agency. In keeping with this requirement for greater efficiency, the Agency should attach a report to each year’s budget on the unspent appropriations carried over from previous years, explaining why those monies have not been used and how and when they will be used.
Amendment 44 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) In order to fulfil properly the new tasks entrusted to it under this Regulation, an increase is needed in the Agency’s resources – albeit a limited one – and special attention is therefore required during the budgetary procedure.
Amendment 56 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In particular, the Agency’s CleanSeaNet system, which is currently used to provide photographic evidence of oil spills from ships, should also be used to detect and report oil spills from coastal and offshore installations.
Amendment 60 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) The Agency should assist the Commission and Member States in developing and implementing the EU’s ‘e- maritime’ initiative, which is designed to improve the efficiency of the maritime sector through better use of information technologies, without prejudice to the areas of competence of national authorities.
Amendment 91 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No1406/2002
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
e) in the implementation of EU programmes related to the Agency's tasks such as the "with regard to the ‘Global Monitoring for Environment and Security"’ (GMES) and cooperation programmes with European Neighbourhood countries, in the promotion of the use of GMES services and data for maritime purposes, within the existing GMES organisational structure;
Amendment 96 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No1406/2002
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
b) develop technical solutions, including the provision of relevant services, and provide technical assistance related to the implementation of EU legislation; in particular, in the interests of efficiency the Agency’s CleanSeaNet system, which is currently used to provide photographic evidence of oil spills from ships, should also be used to detect and report oil spills from coastal and offshore installations.
Amendment 110 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No1406/2002
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
a) in the field of traffic monitoring, the Agency shall in particular promote cooperation between riparian States in the shipping areas concerned in the fields covered by Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, develop and operate any information system necessary for attaining the objectives of that Directive. In particular, the Agency shall develop and operate the LRIT Data Centre and the SafeSeaNet information exchange system referred to in Articles 6b and 22 of the above- mentioned directive, and the LRIT information exchange system in accordance with the commitments given within the IMO. Additionally, it shall contribute to the development of the Common Information Sharing Environment for the EU maritime domain;
Amendment 115 #
2010/0303(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No1406/2002
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
b) regarding the investigation of maritime accidents in accordance with Directive 2009/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ; the Agency shall provide support to the Member States in the conduct of investigations related to serious maritime accidents, and it shall carry out analysis of accident investigation reports with a view to identify added value at EU level in terms of lessons to be learnt. In this connection, the Agency shall be invited to accompany the Member States during accident investigations involving (costal and offshore) maritime installation,) while the Member States shall be invited to cooperate in a full and timely manner with the Agency;
Amendment 31 #
2010/0254(COD)
Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 3 - paragraph 4
Article 3 - paragraph 4
4. Nectars and specific products of Annex III may be sweetened by the addition of sugars or honey. The sales name shall include the word ‘sweetened’ or ‘with added sugar’, followed by an indication of the maximum quantity of sugar added, calculated as dry matter and expressed in grams per litreAny such addition shall be indicated in the list of ingredients, as provided for in current legislation, together with the maximum quantity of sugar added, calculated as dry matter and expressed in grams per litre. Where honey other than natural honey is used, it full composition and/or glucose content shall also be indicated.
Amendment 43 #
2010/0254(COD)
Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 7 a - paragraph 3
Article 7 a - paragraph 3
3. The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of twosix months from the date of notification. At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council this period shall be extended by one month.
Amendment 60 #
2010/0254(COD)
Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Annex
Directive 2001/112/EC
Annex I – part I – point 5 – paragraph 2
Annex I – part I – point 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 58 #
2009/2151(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Invites the Member States to assess the possibility of improving the inclusion of disaster prevention in national operational programming of EU fundingWith a view to ensuring that all public actors involved in environmental protection participate effectively, invites the Member States to lay down, on a compulsory basis, in all general or particular, national, regional and local operational programming a specific item and expenditure heading entitled ‘costs for preventing natural phenomena and disasters’; urges the Commission to support the need to reformulate the operational programmes identified by Member States in this area;
Amendment 67 #
2009/2151(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that the natural characteristics and constraints of sparsely populated regions and, outermost regions, islands and isolated regions need to be acknowledged and taken into due account;
Amendment 128 #
2009/2134(INI)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – indent 11 a (new)
– anyone who has been convicted, by means of a judgment that has the force of res judicata, of corruption, abuse of public office, incitement to racism, crimes relating to involvement with mafia groups, organised crime or terrorism, or sexual abuse;
Amendment 129 #
2009/2134(INI)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – indent 11 b (new)
– anyone who has already served three full, but not necessarily consecutive, terms as a member of the European Parliament;
Amendment 40 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) With a view to pursuing a road safety policy aiming for a high level of protection for all road users in the Union, Member States should act in order to ensure consistent harmonisation of road signs and markings and of road traffic rules, as well as to make the direction of traffic uniform in all Member States. Such harmonisation should aim to create comparable methods, practices and minimum standards at Union level.
Amendment 73 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 a (new)
Annex 1 a (new)
Amendment 108 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Union rules shouldmust apply only to undertakings, the concept of which implies a certain continuity ofi.e. entities which engage in gainful economic activities andon a certain degree of organisationontinuous and organised basis. Operations such as the occasional handling, serving and and delivery of food, the serving of meals and the selling of food by private persons at events such, for example ast charity events, or local community fairs and meetings, shouldand the sale of food in the various forms of direct marketing by farmers, must not fall within the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 128 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Mandatory origin provisions have been developed on the basis of vertical approaches for instance for honey, fruits and vegetables, fish, beef and beef products and olive oil. There is a need to explore the possibility to extend mandatory origin labelling for other foodstuffs. It is therefore appropriate to request the Commission to prepare reports coveringAccordingly, with a view to protecting consumers, the origin provisions must be mandatory for the following foodstuffs: types of meat other than beef, swine, sheep, goat and poultry meat; milk; milk used as an ingredient in dairy products; meat used as an ingredient; unprocessed foods; single ingredient products; and ingredients that represent more than 50 % of a food. Milk being one of the products for which an indication of origin is considered of particular interest, the Commission report on this product should be made available as soon as possible. Based on the conclusions of such reports, the Commission may submit proposals to modify the relevant Union provisions or may take new initiatives, where appropriate, on a sectoral basis.
Amendment 275 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the amounts of fat, saturates, carbohydrates, sugars, natural antioxidants (i.e. those found in the original raw material), protein and salt.
Amendment 328 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. By means of paragraph 1, Member States may introduce measures concerning the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods only where there is a proven link between certain qualities of the food and its origin or provenance. When notifying such measures to the Commission, Member States shall provide evidence thdemonstrate the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that informat the significant value attached to that information has been recognised in legislation.
Amendment 369 #
2008/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – point 1
Annex VI – point 1
1. The name of the food shall include or be accompanied by particulars as to the physical condition of the food or the specific treatment which it has undergone (for example, powdered, freeze-dried, quick-frozen, concentrated, smoked, deodorised) in all cases where omission of such information could mislead the purchaser.