BETA


2010/0354(COD) Agricultural products: marketing standards

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
AGRI
AGRI GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (icon: )
ENVI
IMCO
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2

Events

2015/03/07
   EC - Proposal withdrawn by Commission
2011/08/09
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2011/07/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the report by Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards.

The committee recommends that the European Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the commission proposal as follows:

Optional reserved terms: Members want the specific provisions relating to optional reserved terms and all articles and recitals relating to these terms and to marketing standards, as well as Annex II to be removed from the proposal on product quality schemes and moved to this proposal, so as to integrate all optional reserved terms in the Single CMO.

Conformity with the general marketing standard : in order to resolve the problems faced by small-scale producers in meeting Union marketing standards, the Commission shall, by 30 September 2012, present a report accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals creating appropriate simplified marketing standards for local animal breeds and plant varieties that are used and produced by small-scale producers.

Member States may also:

· adopt or maintain national provisions on aspects of marketing which are not specifically harmonised;

· adopt or maintain national rules on marketing standards for sectors or products to which the general marketing standard applies, provided that those rules are in compliance with Union law and with the rules on the functioning of the single market.

Delegated powers concerning general marketing standard : the Commission shall adopt delegated acts concerning rules relating to the conditions for implementing and monitoring, taking into account the need to avoid lowering the general marketing standard to the point where the quality of European products starts to decline.

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the marketing standards by sector or product, as well as derogations and exemptions from the application of such standards, only for a limited period and in exceptional cases, in order to adapt to the constantly changing market conditions.

Marketing standards shall be revised only if all the groups concerned (which include farmers, processors, traders and consumers) benefit from the revision and the additional costs are not borne by producers alone.

Establishment of marketing standards : Members want to specify that these standards must be established taking into account:

- the interest of consumers to receive adequate and transparent product information, after conducting an impact assessment covering inter alia the costs and administrative burdens for operators, as well as the benefits offered to producers and the end consumer;

- the need to preserve of the natural and essential characteristics of products and to avoid causing a substantial change in the composition of the product concerned.

Third countries : in order to take account of the specificities in trade between the Union and certain third countries and of the special character of some agricultural products and to ensure that consumers are not misled as a result of their established expectations and perceptions, measures may be adopted acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure to define the conditions under which imported products are considered as providing an equivalent level of compliance with the Union requirements concerning marketing standards.

Role of groups : in order to improve and stabilise the operation of the market in products that have been assigned a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication pursuant to the Regulation on agricultural product quality schemes, producer Member States may lay down marketing rules to regulate supply, in particular by implementing decisions taken by the groups.

Pig meat, sheep meat and goat meat : Members ask the Commission to report by 31 December 2012, on the possibilities of establishing specific standards for pigmeat, sheepmeat and goatmeat.

Alignment with the Lisbon Treaty : the report makes several amendments in order r to reflect the common understanding reached between the institutions on the use of delegated acts, as well as the entry into force of the Regulation No (EU) 182/2011 on implementing acts.

Documents
2011/05/04
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2011/04/14
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council had an exchange of views on a proposal for a regulation on agricultural product quality schemes. It should be noted that the Commission drew up the "quality package", which consists of a set of proposals designed to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy aimed at assisting farmers to better communicate the qualities, characteristics and attributes of agricultural products to consumers, on the basis of the Council conclusions of 22 and 23 June 2009 on agricultural product quality.

The "quality package" consists of two texts:

a proposal for a regulation on agricultural product quality schemes ; a proposal amending the "Single CMO" regulation, (regulation No 1234/2007).

Delegations generally welcomed the Presidency's views on a ‘ local farming and direct sales ’ scheme because of the development of this particular sector and consumer demand. However some Member States feared that this scheme could constitute an administrative burden and insisted on keeping the simplification of CAP legislation in mind. In addition, many Member States do not want a European scheme on this issue to interfere with national measures already in place.

Most delegations are in favour of rules for the products of mountain farming supported by the "quality package", but insist on definitions and criteria for such production. Some delegations mentioned the possibility of developing rules for agricultural products coming from very specific areas.

On both issues, many Member States are waiting for the impact assessments scheduled by the Commission before giving a definitive view.

Documents
2011/04/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/03/09
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2011/02/16
   RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2011/02/15
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2011/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2010/12/10
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

BACKGROUND: farmers and producers of agricultural products face competitive pressure resulting from policy reform, globalisation, the concentration of bargaining power in the retail sector, and the state of the economy. At the same time, consumers increasingly look for authentic products produced using specific and traditional methods.

The diversity and quality of European Union agricultural production should be an important strength and source of competitive advantage for Union farmers. However, in order for consumers and buyers to be properly informed about the characteristics and farming attributes of agricultural product, they need to receive accurate and trustworthy labelling information.

Most tools already exist at European Union level. Since the 1990s, Union agricultural product quality policy has been closely identified with three Union schemes, namely for protected designations of origin (PDOs) and protected geographical indications (PGIs), for organic farming, and for traditional specialities guaranteed (TSG). In addition, Union marketing standards have provided a legislative framework for fair competition and smooth functioning of the market since the inception of the common agricultural policy.

Analysis and discussion with stakeholders has shown that these tools may be improved, simplified and made more coherent.

In 2007 a major conference was held bringing together all types of quality schemes: ‘Food quality certification—adding value to farm produce’. The Conference led to the 2008 Green Paper on agricultural product quality , which elicited over 560 detailed stakeholder responses and provided the input for the Communication on agricultural product quality policy in 2009. In response to this communication, the European Parliament adopted the resolution , ‘Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow?’ in March 2010.

The Quality Package consists of a set of proposals designed to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy . It is aimed at assisting farmers to better communicate the qualities, characteristics and attributes of agricultural product, and at ensuring appropriate consumer information. The Quality Package includes:

· a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on agricultural product quality schemes;

· a proposal to modify Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (the single Common Market Organisation) concerning marketing standards for agricultural products;

· guidelines setting out best practice for the development and operation of certification schemes relating to agricultural products and foodstuffs;

· guidelines on the labelling of foodstuffs using Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) as ingredients.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: following the Communication on agricultural product quality policy in 2009 and the main responses to it, two impact assessments were prepared with a view to exploring the options identified in the Communication. These covered designations of origin and geographical indications, and traditional specialities guaranteed. Concerning marketing standards, in addition to the impact assessment work already done in the context of the 2009 Communication, further impact assessment work will be associated as appropriate to the proposals on the specific standards in the context of delegated powers for which a legal framework has been provided within the alignment of Regulation (EC) 1234/2007 to the Treaty of Lisbon.

LEGAL BASE: Article 43(2) on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT : there is an extensive body of legislation that has developed with regard to marketing standards, mostly on a sectoral basis, in the form of regulations and directives adopted both at the level of Council and the Commission. A minimum requirement of "sound, fair and marketable" already exists in market management measures. Extending these minimum requirements to those products not covered by specific standards can be useful for reassuring consumers about the basic quality of the products they buy.

The proposal also takes into account the necessity of the alignment to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and thus the powers to adopt and develop standards in future will be delegated to the Commission.

Under this new framework, a legal basis for compulsory labelling of place of farming will be introduced for all sectors. This allows the Commission, following appropriate impact assessments and on a case by case basis, to adopt delegated acts concerning possible mandatory labelling on place of farming at the appropriate geographical level in order to satisfy the consumers' demands for transparency and information.

One of the first sectors to be examined will be the dairy sector. At the same time the Commission envisages that for the future the mandatory indication of origin, for those sectors in which it already exists, will be maintained.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal does not bear budgetary implications.

2010/10/27
   EP -

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
109 2010/0354(COD)
2011/05/13 AGRI 109 amendments...
source: PE-464.789

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0812)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0812)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/3
date
2011-07-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0281_EN.html title: A7-0281/2011
summary
events/3
date
2011-07-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0281_EN.html title: A7-0281/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
events/0
date
2010-12-10T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2010-12-10T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-281&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0281_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0738 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0738:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3084 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3084*&MEET_DATE=14/04/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3084 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2011-04-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-281&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0281/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO date: 2011-07-18T00:00:00
  • date: 2015-03-07T00:00:00 body: EC type: Proposal withdrawn by Commission commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
commission
  • body: EC dg: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3084 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3084*&MEET_DATE=14/04/2011 date: 2011-04-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2011-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0812)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0812/2011 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2011-08-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0738 title: COM(2010)0738 type: Contribution body: IT_CHAMBER
  • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0738 title: COM(2010)0738 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2011-02-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0738 title: COM(2010)0738 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2011-02-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0738 title: COM(2010)0738 type: Contribution body: RO_SENATE
events
  • date: 2010-12-10T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0738 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=738 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: farmers and producers of agricultural products face competitive pressure resulting from policy reform, globalisation, the concentration of bargaining power in the retail sector, and the state of the economy. At the same time, consumers increasingly look for authentic products produced using specific and traditional methods. The diversity and quality of European Union agricultural production should be an important strength and source of competitive advantage for Union farmers. However, in order for consumers and buyers to be properly informed about the characteristics and farming attributes of agricultural product, they need to receive accurate and trustworthy labelling information. Most tools already exist at European Union level. Since the 1990s, Union agricultural product quality policy has been closely identified with three Union schemes, namely for protected designations of origin (PDOs) and protected geographical indications (PGIs), for organic farming, and for traditional specialities guaranteed (TSG). In addition, Union marketing standards have provided a legislative framework for fair competition and smooth functioning of the market since the inception of the common agricultural policy. Analysis and discussion with stakeholders has shown that these tools may be improved, simplified and made more coherent. In 2007 a major conference was held bringing together all types of quality schemes: ‘Food quality certification—adding value to farm produce’. The Conference led to the 2008 Green Paper on agricultural product quality , which elicited over 560 detailed stakeholder responses and provided the input for the Communication on agricultural product quality policy in 2009. In response to this communication, the European Parliament adopted the resolution , ‘Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow?’ in March 2010. The Quality Package consists of a set of proposals designed to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy . It is aimed at assisting farmers to better communicate the qualities, characteristics and attributes of agricultural product, and at ensuring appropriate consumer information. The Quality Package includes: · a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on agricultural product quality schemes; · a proposal to modify Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (the single Common Market Organisation) concerning marketing standards for agricultural products; · guidelines setting out best practice for the development and operation of certification schemes relating to agricultural products and foodstuffs; · guidelines on the labelling of foodstuffs using Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) as ingredients. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: following the Communication on agricultural product quality policy in 2009 and the main responses to it, two impact assessments were prepared with a view to exploring the options identified in the Communication. These covered designations of origin and geographical indications, and traditional specialities guaranteed. Concerning marketing standards, in addition to the impact assessment work already done in the context of the 2009 Communication, further impact assessment work will be associated as appropriate to the proposals on the specific standards in the context of delegated powers for which a legal framework has been provided within the alignment of Regulation (EC) 1234/2007 to the Treaty of Lisbon. LEGAL BASE: Article 43(2) on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT : there is an extensive body of legislation that has developed with regard to marketing standards, mostly on a sectoral basis, in the form of regulations and directives adopted both at the level of Council and the Commission. A minimum requirement of "sound, fair and marketable" already exists in market management measures. Extending these minimum requirements to those products not covered by specific standards can be useful for reassuring consumers about the basic quality of the products they buy. The proposal also takes into account the necessity of the alignment to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and thus the powers to adopt and develop standards in future will be delegated to the Commission. Under this new framework, a legal basis for compulsory labelling of place of farming will be introduced for all sectors. This allows the Commission, following appropriate impact assessments and on a case by case basis, to adopt delegated acts concerning possible mandatory labelling on place of farming at the appropriate geographical level in order to satisfy the consumers' demands for transparency and information. One of the first sectors to be examined will be the dairy sector. At the same time the Commission envisages that for the future the mandatory indication of origin, for those sectors in which it already exists, will be maintained. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal does not bear budgetary implications.
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-04-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3084*&MEET_DATE=14/04/2011 title: 3084 summary: The Council had an exchange of views on a proposal for a regulation on agricultural product quality schemes. It should be noted that the Commission drew up the "quality package", which consists of a set of proposals designed to put in place a coherent agricultural product quality policy aimed at assisting farmers to better communicate the qualities, characteristics and attributes of agricultural products to consumers, on the basis of the Council conclusions of 22 and 23 June 2009 on agricultural product quality. The "quality package" consists of two texts: a proposal for a regulation on agricultural product quality schemes ; a proposal amending the "Single CMO" regulation, (regulation No 1234/2007). Delegations generally welcomed the Presidency's views on a ‘ local farming and direct sales ’ scheme because of the development of this particular sector and consumer demand. However some Member States feared that this scheme could constitute an administrative burden and insisted on keeping the simplification of CAP legislation in mind. In addition, many Member States do not want a European scheme on this issue to interfere with national measures already in place. Most delegations are in favour of rules for the products of mountain farming supported by the "quality package", but insist on definitions and criteria for such production. Some delegations mentioned the possibility of developing rules for agricultural products coming from very specific areas. On both issues, many Member States are waiting for the impact assessments scheduled by the Commission before giving a definitive view.
  • date: 2011-07-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-281&language=EN title: A7-0281/2011 summary: The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the report by Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards. The committee recommends that the European Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the commission proposal as follows: Optional reserved terms: Members want the specific provisions relating to optional reserved terms and all articles and recitals relating to these terms and to marketing standards, as well as Annex II to be removed from the proposal on product quality schemes and moved to this proposal, so as to integrate all optional reserved terms in the Single CMO. Conformity with the general marketing standard : in order to resolve the problems faced by small-scale producers in meeting Union marketing standards, the Commission shall, by 30 September 2012, present a report accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals creating appropriate simplified marketing standards for local animal breeds and plant varieties that are used and produced by small-scale producers. Member States may also: · adopt or maintain national provisions on aspects of marketing which are not specifically harmonised; · adopt or maintain national rules on marketing standards for sectors or products to which the general marketing standard applies, provided that those rules are in compliance with Union law and with the rules on the functioning of the single market. Delegated powers concerning general marketing standard : the Commission shall adopt delegated acts concerning rules relating to the conditions for implementing and monitoring, taking into account the need to avoid lowering the general marketing standard to the point where the quality of European products starts to decline. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the marketing standards by sector or product, as well as derogations and exemptions from the application of such standards, only for a limited period and in exceptional cases, in order to adapt to the constantly changing market conditions. Marketing standards shall be revised only if all the groups concerned (which include farmers, processors, traders and consumers) benefit from the revision and the additional costs are not borne by producers alone. Establishment of marketing standards : Members want to specify that these standards must be established taking into account: - the interest of consumers to receive adequate and transparent product information, after conducting an impact assessment covering inter alia the costs and administrative burdens for operators, as well as the benefits offered to producers and the end consumer; - the need to preserve of the natural and essential characteristics of products and to avoid causing a substantial change in the composition of the product concerned. Third countries : in order to take account of the specificities in trade between the Union and certain third countries and of the special character of some agricultural products and to ensure that consumers are not misled as a result of their established expectations and perceptions, measures may be adopted acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure to define the conditions under which imported products are considered as providing an equivalent level of compliance with the Union requirements concerning marketing standards. Role of groups : in order to improve and stabilise the operation of the market in products that have been assigned a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication pursuant to the Regulation on agricultural product quality schemes, producer Member States may lay down marketing rules to regulate supply, in particular by implementing decisions taken by the groups. Pig meat, sheep meat and goat meat : Members ask the Commission to report by 31 December 2012, on the possibilities of establishing specific standards for pigmeat, sheepmeat and goatmeat. Alignment with the Lisbon Treaty : the report makes several amendments in order r to reflect the common understanding reached between the institutions on the use of delegated acts, as well as the entry into force of the Regulation No (EU) 182/2011 on implementing acts.
  • date: 2015-03-07T00:00:00 type: Proposal withdrawn by Commission body: EC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AGRI/8/00057
New
  • AGRI/8/00057
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.10.02 Processed products, agri-foodstuffs
  • 3.10.03 Marketing and trade of agricultural products and livestock
  • 3.10.10 Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
  • 4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
  • 4.60.04.04 Food safety
New
3.10.02
Processed products, agri-foodstuffs
3.10.03
Marketing and trade of agricultural products and livestock
3.10.10
Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
4.60.02
Consumer information, advertising, labelling
4.60.04.04
Food safety
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0738:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0738:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
procedure/summary
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
activities/4
date
2015-03-07T00:00:00
body
EC
type
Proposal withdrawn by Commission
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
activities
  • date: 2010-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0738/COM_COM(2010)0738_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52010PC0738:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2010)0738 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development Commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3084 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3084*&MEET_DATE=14/04/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3084 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2011-04-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-281&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0281/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO date: 2011-07-18T00:00:00
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/ title: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: CIOLOŞ Dacian
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AGRI/8/00057
reference
2010/0354(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 043-p2
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
summary
Amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
subtype
Legislation
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
title
Agricultural products: marketing standards
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
subject