Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE) | FLORENZ Karl-Heinz ( PPE), MERKIES Judith A. ( S&D), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), HASSI Satu ( Verts/ALE), OUZKÝ Miroslav ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | PECH | TRAUTMANN Catherine ( S&D) | Patrick LE HYARIC ( GUE/NGL), Jarosław WAŁĘSA ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) | Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | JOHANSSON Kent ( ALDE) | Adam GIEREK ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | IACOLINO Salvatore ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
- 3.10 Agricultural policy and economies
- 3.15 Fisheries policy
- 3.20 Transport policy in general
- 3.40.16 Raw materials
- 3.60 Energy policy
- 3.70.01 Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
- 3.70.03 Climate policy, climate change, ozone layer
- 4.70 Regional policy
- 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 479 votes to 66, with 63 abstentions, a resolution on a resource-efficient Europe in response to a Commission communication on the same subject.
The current economic, financial and environmental crisis shows that Europe urgently needs new sources of sustainable economic growth . The Eurobarometer of March 2011 shows that resource efficiency and sustainable production and consumption are key concerns of EU citizens.
1. Priority actions : Parliament calls on Commission and the Council to:
establish Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food and drink, housing, and mobility in order to develop, as soon as possible, European Resource Efficiency Action Plans; remove the obstacles to a functioning European market in recycling and reuse , and to stimulate such a market by fostering the demand for and availability of recycled materials and by-products, through measures which should include the swift further development of stringent end-of-waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials; boost research and technological innovation in order to speed up the transition to a resource-efficient economy. The Commission is invited to set up an easily accessible, online ‘best practice’ data bank for resource efficiency; agree, by 2013, on clear, robust and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency from a life-cycle perspective and to use these indicators as a basis for legislative initiatives and concrete reduction targets; integrate the resource efficiency agenda as comprehensively as possible into all other policies, including the overarching economic governance policies such as Europe 2020, and to implement it at local, regional, national, and EU level.
2. Agenda for future growth : Parliament endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision. It calls on the Commission to put forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives that are necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are coherently aligned to them and to the overall EU vision for creating a low-carbon economy by 2050, by, inter alia, cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% compared to 1990 levels.
The resolution recalls that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential for improving Europe’s competitiveness and reducing its resource dependency. It calls on the Commission to propose, by the end of 2012 , a new Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policy framework, establishing a process for identifying the priority products or services which contribute the most to the key global consumption areas (water, land, materials and carbon).
Members also underline the urgent need to act now in order to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models, including sectoral industrial strategies and sustainable business models such as a leasing society, and to create the incentives that will bring benefits for the economy.
3. Transforming the economy : Parliament recalls that a reduction in resource use is urgently needed in order to avoid upcoming problems such as resource scarcity and rising resource prices. It considers that for the transition to a resource-efficient economy to be realised, market prices need to fully reflect the degree of resource scarcity , as well as all costs entailed in the production process. Members urge the Commission to research the development of a hierarchy model with a view to ensuring the highest added value of resource use without compromising the environment.
The Commission and the Member States are invited to:
develop incentives that encourage companies and public bodies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their water, land, material and carbon footprints,
extend the producer responsibility principle and to remove barriers that hold back resource efficiency; adopt, without delay and by 2014, concrete plans based on a clear definition for phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020; support, in collaboration with industry and academia, resource efficiency through special university programmes and scholarships.
Parliament calls on the Member States to make a shift towards environmental taxation , emphasising that this should allow for cuts in other taxes such as those on labour, increase competitiveness and create a level playing field, and pave the way for technological development. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor and compare the effects of this instrument.
The resolution stresses the need to:
develop awareness strategies and strategies to alter consumer behaviour; secure a sustainable European supply of raw materials, sufficient to meet the needs of a growing recycling sector; introduce stronger requirements on Green Public Procurement (GPP) for products and services that have significant environmental impacts; extend environmental information requirements to cover conventional mass consumer goods.
Members call on the Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies and plans. They reiterate that the existing targets regarding collection and separation need to be further elaborated and set for the highest and qualitatively best recovery of materials in each phase. The Commission is called upon to make proposals by 2014 with a view to gradually introducing a general ban on waste landfill at European level and for the phasing-out, by the end of this decade, of incineration of recyclable and compostable waste. They consider that a landfill tax – as has already been introduced by some Member States – could also help achieve the above ends.
Members also call on the Commission and the Member States to take more effective action to combat illegal shipments of waste , especially hazardous waste, to non-EU countries. In this context, they call for a ‘European external waste policy’ be established with a view to spreading the best European waste treatment standards beyond the confines of the EU.
The resolution highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource-efficient Europe. It invites the Commission to investigate how resource efficiency in the EU’s mining and processing industry can be boosted in order to increase competitiveness and sustainability, and urges Member States to consider the establishment of centres for innovation technologies to support the extraction, recycling and reuse of useful components from mining waste products and facilitate the subsequent use of mining waste products.
It urges the Commission to examine the effects of a tax on resources and virgin raw materials, and in particular any side-effects, such as non-sustainable substitution, tax avoidance or shifting economic activities to third countries.
4. Natural capital and ecosystem services : Parliament emphasises that biodiversity is essential to the existence of human life and the wellbeing of societies. It stresses the importance of water as a natural resource that is vital for both humankind and ecosystems.
Members take the view that Europe’s resources should be managed in a more strategic and environmentally sound manne r. They believe that a greater effort should be made to manage existing resources in the EU, in particular minerals, metals and timber, as well as energy resources including fossil fuels. The resolution highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture , leading to diminishing imported land use and a reduction in Europe’s carbon footprint.
Parliament stresses the need to boost forestry protection in the EU and consolidate the associated risk prevention methods. It calls on the Commission, together with the timber industry, to examine the scope for specific measures aimed at the sustainable exploitation of forestry resources, in particular via pilot projects. It urges the Commission also to calculate and disclose the costs of the environmental damage arising as a consequence of the EU’s agriculture and fisheries policies .
5. Governance and monitoring : Parliament reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable, clear and verifiable sectoral targets, including an overall target , in order to implement the vision and milestones of the Roadmap. Recognising the need for a solid scientific basis, the Commission is called upon to put forward on that basis a concrete proposal for such targets for the EU and the Member States, at the latest within a year of adoption of the relevant indicators, and to ensure that all EU policies are consistent with the targets set.
Members consider that the milestones included in the Roadmap should be considered as targets until more detailed ones are set. They call on the Member States to include corresponding targets in their own resource efficiency strategies.
6. International dimension : Parliament considers the efficient and sustainable use and allocation of resources to be a key element of EU industrial policy which should also inform the Union’s external relations now and in the future. It takes the view that a fair, open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system and the protection of the environment should be mutually reinforcing.
The resolution reasserts that all current bilateral and regional European trade agreements need to include an ambitious chapter on sustainability . It asks the Commission to incorporate issues related to raw materials to a greater extent in current and future negotiations carried out by the EU on a bilateral or multilateral basis.
Members consider that the inclusion of tariff preferences for environmental products and services produced in a socially responsible way in the Generalised System of Preferences could generate added value in the area of the EU’s trade with developing countries.
Lastly, the resolution points out that the upcoming Rio +20 Earth Summit could be an important forum for discussing the issues of resource efficiency and sustainable development. Parliament urges the EU and its Member States to play a decisive and positive role at this conference in order to meet the challenges of establishing an inclusive and green economy on a global scale.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ALDE, NL) on a resource-efficient Europe in response to a Commission communication on the same subject.
The current economic, financial and environmental crisis shows that Europe urgently needs new sources of sustainable economic growth. The report suggests focusing on the following priority actions . The report calls on Commission and the Council to:
establish Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food and drink, housing, and mobility in order to develop, as soon as possible, European Resource Efficiency Action Plans ; remove the obstacles to a functioning European market in recycling and reuse , and to stimulate such a market by fostering the demand for and availability of recycled materials and by-products, through measures which should include the swift further development of stringent end-of-waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials; boost research and technological innovation in order to speed up the transition to a resource-efficient economy. The Commission is invited to set up an easily accessible, online ‘ best practice ’ data bank for resource efficiency; agree, by 2013, on clear, robust and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency from a life-cycle perspective and to use these indicators as a basis for legislative initiatives and concrete reduction targets; integrate the resource efficiency agenda as comprehensively as possible into all other policies, including the overarching economic governance policies such as Europe 2020, and to implement it at local, regional, national, and EU level.
Agenda for future growth: Members endorse the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision. They call on the Commission to put forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives that are necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are coherently aligned to them and to the overall EU vision for creating a low-carbon economy by 2050, by, inter alia, cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% compared to 1990 levels.
The report recalls that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential for improving Europe ’ s competitiveness and reducing its resource dependency. It calls on the Commission to propose, by the end of 2012, a new Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policy framework, establishing a process for identifying the priority products or services which contribute the most to the key global consumption areas (water, land, materials and carbon).
Members also underline the urgent need to act now in order to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models, including sectoral industrial strategies and sustainable business models such as a leasing society, and to create the incentives that will bring benefits for the economy.
Transforming the economy: Members consider that for the transition to a resource-efficient economy to be realised, market prices need to fully reflect the degree of resource scarcity , as well as all costs entailed in the production process. They endorse the Commission ’ s commitment in the Roadmap to developing market-based instruments to enable negative externalities to be included in market prices, thereby reflecting the true cost of using resources and their environmental impact.
The Commission and the Member States are invited to:
develop incentives that encourage companies and public bodies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their water, land, material and carbon footprints, extend the producer responsibility principle and to remove barriers that hold back resource efficiency; adopt, without delay and by 2014, concrete plans based on a clear definition for phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020.
The Committee calls on the Member States to make a shift towards environmental taxation , emphasising that this should allow for cuts in other taxes such as those on labour, increase competitiveness and create a level playing field, and pave the way for technological development. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor and compare the effects of this instrument.
The report stresses the need to:
develop awareness strategies and strategies to alter consumer behaviour; secure a sustainable European supply of raw materials, sufficient to meet the needs of a growing recycling sector; introduce stronger requirements on Green Public Procurement (GPP) for products and services that have significant environmental impacts; extend environmental information requirements to cover conventional mass consumer goods.
Members call on the Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies and plans. They call on the Commission to make proposals by 2014 with a view to gradually introducing a general ban on waste landfill at European level and for the phasing-out, by the end of this decade, of incineration of recyclable and compostable waste.
Members also call on the Commission and the Member States to take more effective action to combat illegal shipments of waste , especially hazardous waste, to non-EU countries. In this context, they call for a ‘ European external waste policy ’ be established with a view to spreading the best European waste treatment standards beyond the confines of the EU.
The report highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource-efficient Europe. It invites the Commission to investigate how resource efficiency in the EU ’ s mining and processing industry can be boosted in order to increase competitiveness and sustainability, and urges Member States to consider the establishment of centres for innovation technologies to support the extraction, recycling and reuse of useful components from mining waste products and facilitate the subsequent use of mining waste products.
It urges the Commission to examine the effects of a tax on resources and virgin raw materials, and in particular any side-effects, such as non-sustainable substitution, tax avoidance or shifting economic activities to third countries.
Natural capital and ecosystem services: the Commission and the Member States are invited to assess the economic value of ecosystems and integrate these values into reporting and accounting systems by 2015.
Members emphasise that biodiversity is essential to the existence of human life and the wellbeing of societies. They stress the importance of water as a natural resource that is vital for both humankind and ecosystems.
Members take the view that Europe ’ s resources should be managed in a more strategic and environmentally sound manne r; believes that a greater effort should be made to manage existing resources in the EU, in particular minerals, metals and timber, as well as energy resources including fossil fuels.
The report highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture and dietary changes in order to reduce animal protein intake , leading to diminishing imported land use and a reduction in Europe ’ s carbon footprint.
Members stress the need to boost forestry protection in the EU and consolidate the associated risk prevention methods. They call on the Commission, together with the timber industry, to examine the scope for specific measures aimed at the sustainable exploitation of forestry resources, in particular via pilot projects.
They urge the Commission also to calculate and disclose the costs of the environmental damage arising as a consequence of the EU ’ s agriculture and fisheries policies.
International dimension : Members consider the efficient and sustainable use and allocation of resources to be a key element of EU industrial policy which should also inform the Union ’ s external relations now and in the future. They take the view that a fair, open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system and the protection of the environment should be mutually reinforcing.
The report reasserts that all current bilateral and regional European trade agreements need to include an ambitious chapter on sustainability . It asks the Commission to incorporate issues related to raw materials to a greater extent in current and future negotiations carried out by the EU on a bilateral or multilateral basis.
Members consider that the inclusion of tariff preferences for environmental products and services produced in a socially responsible way in the Generalised System of Preferences could generate added value in the area of the EU ’ s trade with developing countries.
Lastly, the report points out that the upcoming Rio +20 Earth Summit could be an important forum for discussing the issues of resource efficiency and sustainable development. Members urge the EU and its Member States to play a decisive and positive role at this conference in order to meet the challenges of establishing an inclusive and green economy on a global scale.
Ministers had an exchange of views concerning the Commission communication "Roadmap to a Resource-Efficient Europe", presented in September 2011.
The Council also adopted conclusions stressing that the roadmap is a key element for the implementation of the flagship initiative " A resource-efficient Europe ", in the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy, which will lead the EU into economic transformation towards a more sustainable and competitive economy and contribute to the world-wide efforts to ensure a transition towards a greener economy.
The conclusions highlighted that all resources should be sustainably managed within environmental limits, from raw materials to energy, water, air, land, soil, biodiversity and marine resources, and waste should be turned into a resource. The EU objective in the context of necessary reductions according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) by developed countries as a group, to reduce emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels should be reached, while biodiversity and the ecosystem services it underpins should be protected, valued and appropriately restored.
Ministers reaffirmed that the transformation will need an integrated and coherent policy framework that creates a level playing field, where eco-innovation and resource efficiency are rewarded, creating economic opportunities and improved security of supply through a life-cycle approach, product redesign and high quality standards, sustainable management of natural resources, greater waste prevention and reuse, recycling and recovery, substitution of environmentally damaging and critical raw materials and resource savings.
Ministers are aware that the shift towards a sustainable and responsible resource-efficient European economy and society will require, in addition to technological innovation, innovation at the level of our socio-economic system, i.e. new governance models , new business and education models , new consumption patterns , and lifestyles geared towards the sustainable management of resources.
In the context of a difficult economic situation, some member states called for innovative financial solutions, also in the framework of the European Semester, arguing for closer cooperation with business. Proper conditions need to be established, both in the form of regulatory and market-based instruments, as well as through voluntary schemes, in order to stimulate resource efficiency.
Ministers underlined the need to address together with all stakeholders, the short-term transitional side-effects and emerging implications of the shift to a resource-efficient economy, such as:
· possible employment loss in some sectors and a need for anticipation and mitigation measures in the process of restructuring;
· the rebound effect, that may result when increases in resource efficiency are offset by increases in consumption which eliminates expected environmental benefits;
· relocation of environmental pressures, especially carbon leakage, which may result from high adaptation costs within the EU compared to regions with lower environmental requirements and no equivalent committments;
· possible trade-offs among and between environmental and other policy objectives.
Several ministers also drew attention to the direct link between the Resource Efficiency Roadmap and the future 7th EAP, which should be complementary and reinforce each other in providing for, respectively, the integration of environmental aspects in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy and the definition of the environmental policy priorities and actions.
The Commission made a statement indicating that it would have preferred more ambitious conclusions.
PURPOSE: presentation of the flagship initiative “A resource-efficient Europe” under the Europe 2020 strategy.
BACKGROUND: natural resources underpin the functioning of the European and global economy and our quality of life. These resources include raw materials such as fuels, minerals and metals but also food, soil, water, air, biomass and ecosystems and the pressures on them are increasing .
If current trends continue, by 2050, the global population is expected to have grown by 30% to around 9 billion and people in developing and emerging economies will legitimately aspire to the welfare and consumption levels of developed countries.
Given these changes, the Commission considers that continuing our current patterns of resource use is not an option . It will be necessary to: i) develop new products and services and find new ways to reduce inputs, ii) minimise waste, iii) improve management of resource stocks, iv) change consumption patterns, and v) optimise production processes, management and business methods in order to boost employment in the “green technology” sector and sustain EU trade.
Using resources more efficiently will help us achieve many of the EU's objectives :
it will be key in making progress to deal with climate change and to achieve our target of reducing EU greenhouse gas emissions by 80 to 95% by 2050; it is needed to protect valuable ecological assets, the services they provide and the quality of life for present and future generations; it will help us ensure that the agricultural and fisheries sectors are strong and sustainable and reduce food insecurity in developing countries; by reducing reliance on increasingly scarce fuels and materials, boosting resource efficiency can also improve the security of Europe's supply of raw materials and make the EU's economy more resilient to future increases in global energy and commodity prices.
To enjoy the benefits of a resource-efficient and low-carbon economy, we need to fulfil three conditions :
take coordinated action in a wide range of policy areas and this action needs political visibility and support; act urgently due to long investment lead-times; empower consumers to move to resource-efficient consumption, to drive continuous innovation and ensure that efficiency gains are not lost.
CONTENT: a resource-efficient Europe is one of seven flagship initiatives as part of the Europe 2020 strategy aiming to deliver smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. This flagship initiative aims to create a framework for policies to support the shift towards a resource-efficient and low-carbon economy which will help the EU to:
boost economic performance while reducing resource use; identify and create new opportunities for economic growth and greater innovation and boost the EU's competitiveness; ensure security of supply of essential resources; fight against climate change and limit the environmental impacts of resource use.
A key aim of this flagship initiative is to increase certainty for investment and innovation by forging an agreement on the long-term vision and ensuring that all relevant policies factor in resource efficiency in a balanced manner.
1) Components for delivering the resource-efficient Europe flagship initiative: the initiative provides a long-term framework for action in many policy areas, supporting policy agendas for climate change, energy, transport, industry, raw materials, agriculture, fisheries, biodiversity and regional development. These different components must be well coordinated.
The key components of the long-term framework will come in the form of a series of coordinated roadmaps to:
outline what the EU needs to do to create a low-carbon economy in 2050 , cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95%, as part of global efforts to fight climate change, while improving energy security and promoting sustainable growth and jobs; analyse how the EU can create an energy system by 2050 which is low-carbon, resource-efficient, secure and competitive. This should provide the necessary certainty for investors, researchers, policy makers and regulators; present a vision for a low-carbon, resource-efficient, secure and competitive transport system by 2050 that removes all obstacles to the internal market for transport, promotes clean technologies and modernises transport networks; define medium and long-term objectives and means for achieving them with the main aim to decouple economic growth from resource use and its environmental impact.
Medium-term measures should be consistent with this long-term framework. A number of such measures have already been identified. These include:
an energy efficiency plan with a time horizon of 2020 which will identify measures to achieve energy savings of 20% across all sectors, and which will be followed by legislation to ensure energy efficiency and savings; proposals to reform the Common Agricultural Policy, the Common Fisheries Policy, Cohesion Policy, energy infrastructure and trans-European networks for transport in the context of the next EU budget to align these areas with the requirements of a resource-efficient, low-carbon economy; a new EU biodiversity strategy for 2020 to halt further loss to and restore biodiversity and ecosystem services in the light of pressures on ecosystems; measures to tackle the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials which will, amongst others, periodically assess critical raw materials and define a trade policy to ensure sustainable supplies of raw materials from global markets. These measures will help ensure coherence between the EU's raw materials and external policies, including the promotion of good governance, transparency of activities and creation of local valued added in developing countries. It will promote extraction, recycling, research, innovation and substitution inside the EU; a strategy to make the EU a 'circular economy', based on a recycling society with the aim of reducing waste generation and using waste as a resource; early action on adaptation to climate change to minimise threats to ecosystems and human health, support economic development and help adjust our infrastructures to cope with unavoidable climate change; a water policy that makes water saving measures and increasing water efficiency a priority, in order to ensure that water is available in sufficient quantities, is of appropriate quality, is used sustainably and with minimum resource input, and is ultimately returned to the environment with acceptable quality.
2) Building up a knowledge base and a consistent analytical approach : the analysis of initiatives under this flagship initiative must be based, where possible, on common assumptions, parameters and baselines, as well as on shared medium- and long-term visions.
As a first step, in early 2011, the Commission will present joint modelling scenarios up to 2050 on climate, energy and transport policies. The preliminary modelling results suggest that an 80% domestic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 compared to 1990 levels is possible using technologies such as carbon capture and storage, renewable energies, nuclear power and electrification. These preliminary modelling results also suggest that the power generation, residential and industry sectors should be able to reduce emissions by more than 80%, the transport sector by around 60% and the agricultural sector by around 40%.
3) Resource efficiency as an increasing global concern: given the global dimension of key environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, land use, deforestation, external impacts of consumption and production patterns, competitiveness, security of supply and access, the EU needs to address resource efficiency issues internationally and to cooperate closely with key partners , including with candidate countries and those in its neighbourhood.
Through its external commercial relations, the EU should continue efforts to provide a level playing field for industry, to improve the conditions for sustainable supply of raw materials, and to promote the liberalisation of trade in environmental goods and services so as to ensure industry's international competitiveness.
The Rio+20 international conference on sustainable development in 2012 will focus on the 'green economy' and environmental governance and will provide a good opportunity for the EU to address resource efficiency with global partners.
4) Governance and monitoring progress : the governance and monitoring will take place in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy and will integrate the relevant elements of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy in order to ensure overall coherence. They will be based on an analysis of EU policies and those of individual Member States in their National Reform Programmes as part of the Annual Growth Survey exercise. This will be done as part of the European Semester for 2012.
The Commission will make concrete proposals for strategies to improve resource efficiency in the various policy areas described above. In the meantime, it invites the European institutions, national parliaments, the Committee of the Regions, the European Economic and Social Committee, candidate countries and stakeholders to contribute to the further development of these strategies and the promotion of resource efficiency.
Documents
- Contribution: COM(2011)0021
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)542
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0223/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0161/2012
- Committee opinion: PE480.778
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE485.854
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE485.855
- Committee draft report: PE480.877
- Committee opinion: PE462.765
- Committee opinion: PE467.080
- Debate in Council: 3139
- Committee opinion: PE467.223
- Contribution: COM(2011)0021
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0021
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE467.223
- Committee opinion: PE467.080
- Committee opinion: PE462.765
- Committee draft report: PE480.877
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE485.854
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE485.855
- Committee opinion: PE480.778
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)542
- Contribution: COM(2011)0021
- Contribution: COM(2011)0021
Activities
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Kinga GÖNCZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Jutta STEINRUCK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Heinz K. BECKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Milan CABRNOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Alejandro CERCAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Frédéric DAERDEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Thomas HÄNDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Iliana IOTOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Krzysztof LISEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Thomas MANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Sylvana RAPTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Nicole SINCLAIRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Emilie TURUNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Artur ZASADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
Amendments | Dossier |
444 |
2011/2068(INI)
2011/07/14
REGI
58 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Underlines that preserving regional ecosystems leads to sustainable jobs and socio-economic development, therefore calls for more investment in natural capital as a source of regional economic development; calls upon regions and Member States to use the possibility to refocus operational programmes on natural risk prevention and green infrastructure such as eco-corridors, coastal zones, forests and rivers;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Emphasises that eco-innovation can bring improved resource efficiency and new jobs in all economic sectors and needs support from structural funds by supporting local and regional clusters and SMEs in the green technology field;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Recalls that sustainable development has to be mainstreamed into the conception, implementation and evaluation of regional development projects and needs a set of sustainable development indicators that can be developed by national and regional authorities; emphasises that regions and cities should make more use of green public procurement;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve a resource-efficient Europe, increased coordination and synergies between a wide range of policy areas and their various instruments should be implemented at regional, national and EU level with a view to ensuring their effectiveness; points out that regional policy already has a coordinated and integrated approach in place; notes that trade-offs between certain policy areas exist, and these need to be addressed; calls for a mainstreaming of climate protection in the future cohesion policy by using the NECATER tool which has been developed in France;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve a resource-efficient Europe, increased coordination and synergies between a wide range of policy areas and their various instruments, together with the sharing of best practice, should be implemented at local, regional, national and EU level with a view to ensuring their effectiveness and boosting transfers of knowledge; points out that regional policy already has a coordinated and integrated approach in place; notes that trade-offs between certain policy areas exist, and these need to be addressed;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve a resource-efficient Europe, increased coordination and synergies between a wide range of policy areas and their various instruments, synergy between the actions taken and a joint strategy for sustainable and rational resource use should be implemented at regional, national and EU level with a view to ensuring their effectiveness; points out that regional policy already has a coordinated and integrated approach in place; notes that trade-offs between certain policy areas exist, and these need to be
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve a resource-efficient Europe, increased coordination and synergies between a wide
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that in order to achieve a resource-efficient Europe, increased coordination and synergies between a wide range of policy areas and their various instruments should be implemented at regional, national and EU level with a view to ensuring their effectiveness; points out that regional policy already has a coordinated and integrated approach in place; notes that trade-offs between certain policy areas exist, and these need to be addressed, with clear, evidence-based political guidance;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws attention to the benefits, in particular for the outlying and outermost regions, that are to be gained from greater synergy between the Structural Funds and the EU’s external cooperation financial instruments; calls for implementation of the Wider European Neighbourhood Action Plan for the outermost regions;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on the quality of life for present and future generation; Notes that any strategy must include all of Europe's vast resources including raw materials such as fuels, minerals and metals and also resources such as food, soil, water, air, and the natural environment;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU's priorities for sustainable development; Calls for a review of current programmes and practices to ensure that the most efficient use of resources is a key consideration within regional policy;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU's priorities for sustainable development and the valuable involvement of partners under the partnership principle which needs appropriate funding under technical assistance, capacity building of the partners and an upgrade in the context of simplification;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU’s priorities for sustainable development; considers that these priorities should be taken into account in future legislation on regional policy, emphasising projects which promote resource efficiency;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU’s priorities for sustainable development; stresses that EU measures and strategies that have resolved issues relating to effective use of resources should serve as a model for the adoption and implementation of other strategies for other issues relating to the management of natural resources;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU’s priorities for sustainable development; stresses that appropriate infrastructure is required for the development and dissemination of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems, including education and training opportunities, farm advisory services and exchanges of best practices, in order to modernise agriculture, help innovative farmers to pass on their experience and improve added value chains in rural areas; believes that such programmes should be made available in all Member States;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial potential role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at the above efficient use of resources
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial role of regional policy in supporting initiatives aiming at efficient use of resources, in particular in connection with building energy efficiency, investment in research, innovation and sustainable development, owing to its long-term development programmes, decentralised administration system and the incorporation of the EU’s priorities for sustainable development;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the current debate on a future cohesion policy that should be results- oriented and invites to include resource efficiency in the main goals that have to be achieved;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Draws attention to the importance of groups of regions and Member States drawing up joint strategies for effective resource use; stresses, in this connection, the important role that European territorial cooperation can play in securing coordinated strategies of this kind, as well as the urgent need to invest in cross-border energy and environmental infrastructure with a view to ensuring that resources are protected and moved more effectively; calls, furthermore, for macro- regional strategies focusing, in particular, on environmental protection and energy supply and independence to be drawn up;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on sustainable development of territories and on the quality of life for present and future generation and their growing needs due to the demographic change; underlines the importance to focus investment on sustainable development with an emphasis on a resource efficient and low-carbon economy in order to better use the great potential of green jobs which will have a positive impact on the employment situation on local and regional level;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and partners should be directly involved in the planning and implementation of relevant measures; this would lead to a greater feeling of responsibility for the goals of resource efficiency at all levels; recommends identifying and promoting examples of best practice in the context of networks of local and regional authorities;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasi
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and private- and voluntary-sector partners should be directly involved in the planning and implementation of relevant measures; this would lead to a greater feeling of responsibility for the goals of resource efficiency at all levels;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and partners should be directly involved in the planning and implementation of relevant measures, including projects for energy efficiency in housing, construction and sustainable mobility; this would lead to a greater feeling of responsibility for the goals of resource efficiency at all levels;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and partners should be directly involved in the planning and implementation of relevant measures; this would lead to a greater feeling of responsibility for the goals of resource efficiency at all levels; stresses the need for local and regional authorities to align measures of resource efficiency with the EU 2020 strategy and include these measures into the broader territorial pacts which cover all flagships;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on the quality of life for present and future generations, while ensuring greater intergenerational solidarity;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasizes that resource efficiency should be addressed at regional and local level, – taking into account the particularities and different development levels of European regions – and regional and local authorities and socio-economic and voluntary-sector partners should be directly involved at all stages in the planning and implementation of
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the importance of focusing on implementing a more effective management policy with a view to ensuring that available resources are not squandered, and stresses the need to raise public awareness and engagement within the EU;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses, furthermore, the importance of creating throughout the EU specific and appropriate incentives for private individuals, such as house owners and/or landowners, to be as resource-efficient as possible in managing their property;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that climate change is one of the major long-term determining factors, and believes that it is therefore necessary to act in an effective and consistent fashion at regional, national and Union level and that there is a need for R&D in this field with a view to creating a framework for resource use;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recommends to the Member
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recommends to the Members States that they involve the sub-national levels from the outset in defining priorities, planning of measures and in their implementation; Further recommends that a consultation with citizens is undertaken to provide a platform for discussion and information as the public will be key to implementing these measures and will be the ultimate beneficiaries of a resource efficient Europe;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recommends to the Members States that they involve the sub-national levels directly from the outset in defining priorities, planning of
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need for a common set of indicators that will enable the full effect of the measures adopted at sectoral level to be assessed, and believes that the Commission must be involved in determining those indicators;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that every year in the EU EUR 5.25 million worth of raw materials is disposed of, unused, as waste; stresses therefore the crucial role of waste management in resource efficiency; accordingly, calls for more use to be made of waste as a source of raw materials;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to promote the pooling of good practice within the EU as regards the management of regional funds, which play a key role in the use of resources;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on the quality of life for present and future generation; takes the view that cohesion policy, together with a new and powerful CAP, will release the economic potential of rural areas and generate secure jobs, guaranteeing the sustainable development of these areas;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that decision-takers at national and regional level must be fully aware of the importance of
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that decision-takers at national and regional level must be fully aware of the importance of decoupling growth from resource use; calls on every Member State and region to make further
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that decision-takers at national and regional level must be fully aware of the importance of decoupling growth from resource use; calls on every Member State and region to make further efforts in the efficient use of resources
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that transparency in respect of cohesion policy and its programming cycle, allocation of expenditure and access to information for potential beneficiaries of the structural funds are key prerequisites for achieving the overall objectives of cohesion policy; calls on the Commission to ensure that financing of infrastructure investment is subjected to local democratic scrutiny and in accordance with the needs of users;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that innovation and research are needed in order to attain more sustainable production and consumption patterns;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Draws attention to the benefits to be gained from disseminating good practice more widely among cohesion policy stakeholders;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Recalls that the ERDF must continue to meet the complementary goals of efficient use of resources and the fight against energy poverty;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses that both entrepreneurs and consumers have an important key to a resource-efficient Europe in their hands;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Stresses the need to promote the financial engineering tool JESSICA for energy infrastructure and energy efficiency projects in urban areas.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the flagship initiative on resource efficiency and points to its crucial influence on the quality of life for present
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to focus investments on energy efficiency, renewable energies, energy efficiency of buildings and clean transport as well as on regional infrastructure for renewable energies, especially in disadvantaged regions; invites Member States to reinforce the contribution of structural funds to sustainable growth in the current programming period and asks the Commission to assess the modified operational programmes in an unbureaucratic and quick way;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for grater synergies between cohesion policy and neighbourhood policy for co-financing cross-border energy infrastructure projects;
source: PE-469.854
2012/01/05
ITRE
69 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of resource efficiency to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines the fact that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential to improve Europe
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the success of resource efficiency policy greatly depends on its being consistent with all relevant internal and external EU policies and on the political commitment of Member States to implementing it; urges the Commission to come forward with clear targets and measures, including specific objectives and concrete legislative initiatives, underpinned by the funds and financial mechanisms needed to support them, to ensure that the flagship proposal will be successful;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the success of resource efficiency policy greatly depends on its being consistent with all relevant internal and external EU policies and on the political commitment of Member States to implementing it; urges the Commission to come forward with
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the success of resource efficiency policy greatly depends on its being consistent with all relevant internal and external EU policies and on the political commitment of Member States to implementing it; urges the Commission to come forward with
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the EU will need to support more research, innovation and development activities if it is to ensure the improvement in the medium term of the availability and performance of the technologies required for more efficient resource use and greater economic competitiveness;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission’s idea of shifting taxation on production costs away from labour towards
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission's idea of shifting taxation away from labour towards resource consumption; welcomes the intention to encourage Member States to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS), which should be achieved in way that doesn't harm EU's competitiveness and doesn't increase the risk of carbon leakage;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission's idea of shifting taxation away from labour towards resource consumption; welcomes the intention to encourage Member States to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS); urges Member States to promote new technologies and sustainable growth through green public procurement;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission's idea of shifting taxation away from labour towards resource consumption; welcomes the intention to encourage Member States to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS) by preparing plans and timetables and report on those as part of their National Reform Programmes;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of resource efficiency to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines the fact that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential to improve Europe's industrial competitiveness and reduce its relative dependence on imported resources; strongly believes that the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation should play a vital role in this respect;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission’s idea of shifting taxation away from labour towards resource consumption; welcomes the intention to encourage Member States to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the Commission's idea of shifting taxation away from labour towards
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds the fact that resource efficiency should aim to help Europe boost technical performance to extract more along the whole value chain (when mining, processing, refining, recycling);
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that using indirect taxation or removing existing subsidies should not be an adequate tool to increase resource efficiency as it may lead to negative externalities in various sectors and raise social equity concerns; any increase in the total cost of raw materials may also have a consequence of the investment being drawn out of the EU;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use; in particular calls on the Commission to strongly consider extending the eco-design directive to cover criteria such as resource efficiency, recycled material rates, durability and reusability; believes that standardisation has an important role to play in this context; calls on the European Commission to consider a top-runner programme as an efficient incentive mechanism for performance improvement;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use; endorses the Commission's view that this transition should be made through policies delivering most benefits for the EU’s growth, jobs and energy security;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use, in which connection account should always be taken of the complete life cycle of the product, devoting extra attention to the reuse of raw materials at the end of its life (cradle to cradle);
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in society’s consumption
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights that many industry sectors, in particular those exposed to international competition have substantially increased the efficiency in using resources, mainly driven by enormous price increases; stresses, however, the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of natural resource efficiency to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines the
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use; calls for the full implementation and expanded scope of the Ecodesign Directive;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use as well as in research on new sustainable mining technologies;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the fact that boosting resource efficiency requires a profound change in consumption and production patterns, achievable through new solutions for smart resource management; calls, therefore, for investment in product design, innovative business models, resource recycling and waste management, substitution and re-use;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to streamline resource efficiency in the Integrated Industrial Policy flagship and the Innovation Union flagship initiatives, which should include the development of long-term sectoral industrial strategies and policies needed to assist the transition to a low-carbon, resource and energy- efficient economy;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and in particular of the waste hierarchy, which should aim at prioritising prevention, reuse, recycling and other recovery over disposal methods whilst continuing progressively to reduce landfill;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the need for alternative products to be used, altering energy- and material-intensive consumption patterns whilst achieving the same level of performance, and the need for alternative raw and other materials to be used, making manufacturing processes less energy-intensive;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the most secure way to achieving resource efficiency without hampering European industrial capability, growth potential and competitiveness is investing in research, development and innovation; therefore, calls for aligning the European R&D&I efforts with resource efficiency objectives;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, given that climate change has created a shortage of drinking water, to adopt, by 30 June 2012, a Union strategy and action plan for the protection and efficient use of drinking water;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of using its own resources for the competitiveness and innovation of the European industry; emphasizes the role of new mining technologies for the sustainable mining;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Highlights the importance of having accurate mechanisms and methods for measuring the current and predicting the future resource consumption of Europe, across all sectors, in order to be able to design effective resource efficiency policies, adapt to future trends and manage real and artificial shortages of raw materials;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of resource efficiency to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines the fact that decoupling absolutely economic growth from resource consumption, notably of materials1, is essential to improve Europe’s industrial
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points out that an increase in entropy means that not all manufacturing waste can currently be restored to its original state via low-energy recycling; notes that secondary uses can be found for such waste, i.e. it can be an excellent filler, insulator or foundation material;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to finally put forward the new Eco-Innovation Action Plan foreseen to be published since 2010 but continuously delayed;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Notes that resource efficiency should not be an end in itself, instead it should be an indispensable tool for achieving development, growth, sustainablity, competitiveness, employment and prosperity for European citizens and enterprises;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Takes the view that natural materials, including enhanced wood and enhanced mineral materials, can be used successfully as substitutes for the building materials used today;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the European Commission to consider how near net shape manufacturing technologies can be promoted amongst the manufacturing industry;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Calls on the Commission to require Member States to actively promote industrial symbiosis activities and the development of eco-industrial parks and to support these activities through a specific programme addressed at the industrial actors and the responsible local development agencies or authorities in this field;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Points out that a lack of end users is a major obstacle to the full recycling of differentiated municipal waste; considers that innovative technologies and financial support schemes for SMEs are essential in order for high-quality, market-driven products to be produced using these resources;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Calls for sufficient funding to be dedicated to resource efficiency research and innovation programmes in the Horizon 2020 programme, both under the societal challenges and the industrial competitiveness programmes, as well as in the specific instruments for SMEs; welcomes the establishment of a Resource Efficiency Finance Round Table;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 f (new) 4f. Calls for the European Innovation Partnerships and Knowledge Innovation Centres that are foreseen to be established on the topic of Raw Materials, to not only address the aspect of sustainable exploitation, management and recycling of resources but also prevention, reuse and substitution;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 g (new) 4g. Believes that green public procurement is an important instrument to promote resource efficiency and the uptake of more resource efficient products; believes that activities to develop criteria and their uptake by public authorities should be strengthened at EU and Member States level;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to produce as quickly as possible a life-cycle based indicator for materials consumption, one which integrates hidden flows, namely the possible transfer of environmental pressures outside the EU and shifts in scarcities and dependencies, there being limits to the flagship indicator for resource productivity;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 h (new) 4h. Calls on the Commission to investigate how resource efficiency can be increased among the EU's mining and processing industry in order to increase competitiveness and sustainability by inter alia promoting the uptake of new technologies and enhancing the production of by-products alongside base metals;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Believes that a greater effort should be made to develop existing resources in Europe, in particular minerals, metal and
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Believes that a greater effort should be made to develop existing mineral, metal and forestry resources in Europe; stresses northern Europe's potential to contribute to EU raw material needs and calls for the strategic and environmentally sound development and management of its resources and for reducing the dependence of Europe on imports of raw materials produced with environmentally unsustainable methods;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Believes that a greater effort should be made to develop existing mineral, metal and forestry resources in Europe; stresses
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Takes the view that the industries in the Member States ought increasingly to rely on domestic raw materials; points out that the management of domestic resources should ensure that they are not wasted and that they are used for the benefit of local communities, for example through tax revenue or jobs in raw material processing plants situated near the places in which they are used;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in the context of the next framework programme for research, to develop a programme for research and innovation in the field of new substances and materials and materials which could in the future replace existing raw materials now characterised by shortages;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that to assure the mineral resources security for the Member States it is necessary to consider the basis of sustainable development through fossil fuels deposits protection, development of potential resources basis and the creation of proper policy for mineral resources exploitation;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that northern European forestry resources have a great potential to contribute to the EU's energy efficiency targets and offer a sustainable way of increasing energy efficiency of the EU's building sector;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the EU to promote the use of biomass, a renewable raw material, in the production and use of bio-sourced products;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the need to boost forestry protection in the European Union and strengthen the associated risk prevention methods, as forestry resources and the environmental qualities of wood constitute important natural capital; asks for a financial instrument for forest-fire and parasite prevention measures to be set up; calls on the Commission, together with the timber industry, to examine the scope for taking specific measures aimed at the sustainable exploitation of forestry resources, in particular via pilot projects; advocates a better use of the forestry measures already in place under the EU’s various policies, in order to improve the economic value of forests and ensure greater availability of wood, for example through replanting work under rural development programmes;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the need to invest in the recycling of raw materials and rare earths, given that the mining, refining and recycling of rare earths have severe environmental consequences unless they are properly managed;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of increasing checks on illegal exports of waste in order to retain valuable raw materials within the EU;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the increased global competition for resources and ‘technology metals’; stresses that European
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the increased global competition for resources and ‘technology metals’; stresses that European ‘green leadership’ globally and the ‘green jobs’ potential in the EU are highly dependent on a secure supply of these imported resources; calls for an EU industrial innovation policy based on the principles of reduce, re-use, recycle and substitution, as well as an EU trade policy based on transparenc
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the increased global competition for resources and ‘technology metals’; stresses that Europe
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the increased global competition for resources and ‘technology metals’; stresses that European
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for additional attention to be devoted to innovative technologies making it possible to recover and reuse valuable raw materials, such as landfill mining and urban mining;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen advisory services on resource efficiency, particularly for SMEs, for example by strengthening such programmes in the European Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (EACI); calls on the Commission to support SMEs in this field by promoting the sharing of best practice among Member States, providing access to relevant research under FP7 and Horizon 2020;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the importance of skills and training; calls on the Commission and the Member States to engage in a close dialogue with the social partners, academia and industry in this context; calls on the Commission and Member States, in collaboration with industry and academia, to support resource efficiency through special university programmes and scholarships; further supports, in this context, exchange programmes in this field such as the Erasmus Mundus Minerals and Environmental Programme;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Draws attention to the fact that each year the EU generates recyclable waste such as paper, glass, plastic, aluminium and steel to the value of EUR 5.25 billion, while recycling all this could avoid the annual release of 148 million tonnes of CO2,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that better urban waste management would avoid the release of 92 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 (compared with 1995), while more than 500 000 jobs would be created in Europe if Member States recycled 70% of their waste;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the success of resource efficiency policy greatly depends on its being consistent with all relevant internal and external EU policies and on the political commitment of Member States to implementing it; urges the Commission, t
source: PE-478.372
2012/01/09
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the Commission proposes in the CFP reform package to introduce maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach for bringing the fish stocks up to healthy levels and maintaining them in healthy conditions; however calls on the Commission to clarify the MSY approach, in particular with regard to multi-species fish stocks; notes that the measures to conserve stocks should be based on the precautionary principle and that, in addition, there should be strict application of the rule that the amount of fishing activity may not be increased except in cases where the scientific recommendations are that this will do no harm to fish stocks;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that the long term aspiration should be to allow fish stocks to recover to levels that can exceed MSY and generate maximum economic yields on a sustainable and long term basis, and therefore calls on the Commission to undertake such research as is necessary and then to bring forward proposals to build on the current proposals for CFP reform and move towards a position that will be environmentally and economically more advanced;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Agrees with the Commission's view, outlined in the CFP reform package, that the practice of throwing unwanted fish overboard is a waste of resources; points out, however, that solutions discussed with fishermen and other stakeholders and adapted to the reality of their working conditions need to be sought in order to improve the situation; calls on the Commission to strengthen the measures to conserve over-exploited fish stocks so as to ensure that the activities of the EU fishing industry are ecologically, economically and socially sustainable;
source: PE-478.659
2012/03/08
INTA
42 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regards the efficient use of resources as a key element of the European Union's external relations and believes that t
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the support and preservation of a
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the support and preservation of an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system and environmental protection
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Emphasises that technologies and procedures for increasing resource efficiency are important factors in improving development opportunities in many third countries, and urges that these mechanisms should receive special attention in international cooperation;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that trade liberalisation can conflict with climate protection if certain countries seek a competitive advantage by failing to act on climate issues; suggests, therefore, a reform of the WTO anti- dumping rules to include the issue of a fair environmental price in accordance with global climate protection standards;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the work carried out in the course of the World Trade Organisation's Doha Round of trade negotiations on the reduction or elimination of tariff and non- tariff barriers to trade in environmental goods and services
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the work carried out in the course of the World Trade Organisation's Doha Round of trade negotiations on the
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Believes that the inequitable use and allocation of world resources, in terms of food, water and energy, should be addressed urgently, by building a multilateral fair trade environment where all basic human needs are secured;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Points out that the upcoming Rio +20 Earth Summit could be an important forum to discuss the issues of resource efficiency and sustainable development, believes that a new set of sustainable development goals (SDGs) could fill the MDG gaps and could become a powerful successor global project that recognises the inextricable links between the environment and every dimension of development, urges the EU and its Member States to play a decisive and positive role at this conference in order to meet the challenges of establishing an inclusive and green economy on a global scale;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regards the efficient use and allocation of resources as a key element of the European Union's external relations and believes that fair trade in environmental goods and services
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Believes that the EU should help create a global system for the equitable use and allocation of world resources; encourages the European Commission to push for the inclusion of environmental standards and fair trade principles at the WTO;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Believes that in the context and run up to the Rio +20 conference, a new and enforced debate that involves all UN Member States, civil society and trade unions in particular on the effectiveness of the voluntary character of Corporate Social Responsibility is needed;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that although opening up global markets to environmental goods and services creates increased export opportunities
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that opening up global markets to environmental goods and services creates increased export opportunities, encourages the diffusion of technologies, stimulates innovation and leads to lower prices, higher quality and greater consumer choice; but must also be pursued in a manner which encourages sustainable consumption;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that opening up global markets to environmental goods and services creates increased export opportunities, encourages the diffusion of technologies, stimulates innovation, increases competitiveness, creates new jobs and leads to lower prices, higher quality and greater consumer choice;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that opening up global markets to environmental goods and services creates increased export opportunities, encourages the diffusion of green technologies, stimulates innovation and leads to lower prices, higher quality and greater consumer choice;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Is of the strong opinion that all current and future bilateral European agreements must include an ambitious chapter on social and environmental sustainability;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Asks the European Commission to incorporate to a greater extent issues related to raw materials, such as a) the limits on exports and b) investment aspects in current and future negotiations carried out by the EU on a bilateral or multilateral basis;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regards the efficient use of resources as a key element of the European Union's industrial policy which should also inform the Union's external relations
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls for the development of an SME- friendly standard for the use of resources based on ISO 26000 and concepts such as Global compact. This standard, which analyses environmental aspects and leads to resource and cost savings, making businesses more competitive, should be just as binding as the annual financial reports from limited liability companies and businesses listed on the stock market. This standard must also encompass business activities in third countries; in particular, the Commission should present a corresponding proposal for the revision of the Directive on Annual Accounts 2003/51/EC and the Directive on Transparency 2004/109/EC;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the focus on Green Public Procurement (GPP) in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap of the EU, which is putting additional requirements on products and projects with significant environmental impact; calls on the Commission to work towards stronger disciplines of resource efficient procurement also in the frame of the plurilateral Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) of the WTO;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Welcomes the EU's Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) as an important step in a lifecycle approach to resource consumption and insists that in the implementation of the FQD suppliers apply a separate default value for tar sands;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Is concerned about the distorting effect that fossil energy subsidies have on world trade, their impact on the climate, and their cost to the public purse; welcomes the G20's commitment to phase out these subsidies; calls on the EU to assume international leadership on this matter and calls on the Commission to come up swiftly with proposals for a timetable to phase out these subsidies in the EU; reiterates also Parliament's request to the Commission and Member States to inform the European Parliament about loans granted by export credit agencies and the European Investment Bank to projects that have a negative impact on the climate;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reasserts that all current bilateral and regional European trade agreements need to include an ambitious chapter on sustainability, as in the case of the most recent Free Trade Agreement
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reasserts that all current bilateral European agreements need to include an
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reasserts that all current bilateral European agreements need to include an ambitious chapter on sustainability, as in the case of the recent Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea; that agreement contains a chapter on trade and sustainable development which extends the definition of sustainability beyond the scope of previous agreements and provides for the setting up of a special committee to monitor the implementation of commitments in the environmental field; further underlines that the aspects of a trade deal which deal with sustainability should be considered as being of equal importance as those which pertain to the commercial aspects of the agreement, and should therefore be subject to the same enforcement procedures as the commercial chapters;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Further to this, calls on the European Commission to ensure that in future bilateral trade deals negotiated by the EU, the chapters which deal with sustainability and the environment are not banished to the periphery of the agreement as they have been in the past, but are placed on an equal footing with the commercial aspects of the deal;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that including tariff preferences for environmental products and services produced in a socially-responsible way in the Generalised System of Preferences could generate added value in the area of the European Union's trade with developing countries and act as a further incentive to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that including tariff preferences for environmental products and services in the Generalised System of Preferences could generate added value in the area of the European Union's trade with developing countries and act as a further incentive to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regards the efficient use of resources as a key element of the European Union's external relations and believes that trade in environmental goods and services
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Urges the Commission to investigate the introduction of a 'say what you pay' obligation for publicly traded companies operating within Europe, similar to that introduced by the Dodd-Frank anti- corruption legislation in the USA. Such a measure, which would compel companies to disclose exactly how much they pay foreign governments to acquire drilling and mining rights, would ensure that the benefits of the international trade in natural resources would be spread between the developed and developing world, and that the exploitation of natural resources, which often leaves poor countries worse off due to corruption and instability, would be done in a transparent and development-friendly manner.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Emphasises that a country’s efficient use of its own resources is a key ally to economic generation, contributing significantly to a reduction in the volume of energy imports.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Considers that trade liberalisation and investment can encourage developing countries to adopt and improve access to new green technologies.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regards the sustainable and efficient use of resources as a key element of the European Union's external relations and believes that trade in
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Considers the capitalist way of production with at its heart the stimulation of competition and profit maximisation not to be resource-efficient, in this regard points out that "planned obsolescence" is an integral part of this way of production with unnecessary waste of resources as a result, is therefore of the opinion that a fundamental change in the way of production on an international scale needs to take place if the objectives of the Commission´s flagship initiative are to be achieved;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Underlines that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential to improve Europe's competitiveness and reduce its resource dependency;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Has clearly ascertained that the intensive use of global resources, particularly non-renewable ones, is dangerous for the planet and also threatens the security of energy supplies;
source: PE-483.864
2012/03/13
ENVI
272 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the communication of the Commission on Improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness (COM(2012)95);
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the over-use of natural resources leads to environmental degradation, more rapid climate change, and destruction of the earth’s natural capital;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, Member States and businesses to base their economic strategies on radically improved resource efficiency leading to a decoupling of economic growth from resource consumption and exhaustion; believes also that there is a need to focus on both the efficiency and effectiveness of resource use;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, Member States and businesses to base their economic strategies on radically improved resource efficiency leading to a complete decoupling of economic growth from resource consumption; believes also that there is a need to focus on both the efficiency and effectiveness of resource use
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, Member States and businesses to base their economic strategies on radically improved
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission and Member States actively to promote investment in research and innovation which will produce growth; calls on the Commission, Member States and businesses to base their economic strategies on radically improved resource efficiency leading to a decoupling of economic growth from resource consumption; believes also that there is a need to focus on both the efficiency and effectiveness of resource use;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission, by the end of 2012, to identify those priority products or services that contribute the most to key global consumption areas water, land, materials and carbon to be coherent with the consumption indicators as laid down in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap.
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models and to create the incentives that will bring long- term benefits for the economy; emphasises the key role of the private sector in delivering green economic growth, but notes that small and medium-sized enterprises are, from that point of view, in a special position;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the urgency
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models and to create the incentives that will bring long- term benefits for the economy; emphasises the key role of the private sector, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, in delivering green economic growth;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models, such as a leasing society, and to create the incentives that will bring both short- and long-
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the urgency of taking action now to support innovation and investment in new techniques and business models and to create the incentives that will bring long- term benefits for the economy; underlines in this respect the importance of finding ways to further enhance and stimulate European venture capital, to be both supported by public sector institutions but coupled with increasing private funding; emphasises the key role of the private sector in delivering green economic growth;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Is concerned about the increasing application of nano-technology - e.g. silver in nano-particles for anti-bacterial use - which may lead to irretrievability of these materials; calls for careful study of the environmental impact before the technique is more widely taken up;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and Member States for equal treatment of public and private sector concerning the charge of VAT for services in order to provide fair competition on the market, under which the private sector can unlock all potential in delivering green economic growth.
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Underlines that Europe as a recycling society needs to reuse and recycle to a large extent its own waste and produce secondary raw materials in the most efficient way: accordingly, a EU-wide proximity principle should be extended to all recovery operations optimising the distance from the source to the recovery installation;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Emphasises that the first-mover advantage in resource efficiency can capture growing markets. The EU holds roughly one third of the world market for environmental technologies;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that for the transition to a resource-efficient economy to be realised, market prices should reflect fully the degree of resource scarcity as well as all the costs entailed in the production process; calls for the implementation of the life cycle approach in the accounting process and the internalisation of the external environmental costs according to the polluter-pays principle;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their resource efficiency, by promoting, for example, ISO 14001-type approaches for environmental management systems, as well as measures to
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their resource efficiency, as well as measures to
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their resource efficiency, as well as
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas intense resource use and dramatically increased
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies and public bodies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their resource efficiency, as well as measures to
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Emphasizes the importance of the role that citizens and civil organisations play in bringing about a change in transforming the economy; stresses the need to develop awareness strategies and strategies to alter consumer behaviour and to avoid rebound effects;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recalls that an absolute reduction of resource use is urgently needed in order to avoid upcoming problems such as resource scarcity and rising prices of resources;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission, as regards the choice of means, to give preference to incentives and voluntary solutions over state regulation;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote investment in waste and water management in order to meet the requirements of the environmental and water acquis;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to study, and if appropriate, to propose modifications to the existing legislation regarding accounting rules and rules governing credit rating agencies as regards mandatory inclusion of resource efficiency indicators into accounting standards, as well as including resource use and environmental risks into the rating parameters of credit rating agencies;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Underlines the need to secure a sustainable European supply of raw materials necessary to meeting the needs of a growing recycling sector, expanding Europe's open economy and generating jobs;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for stronger requirements on Green Public Procurement (GPP) for products with significant environmental impacts and urges the Commission to assess where GPP could be linked to EU- funded projects; calls for efforts to promote joint procurement and networks of public procurement officers in support of GPP by the end of this year, on the understanding that this must not lead to a competitive disadvantage for public enterprises;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for stronger requirements on Green Public Procurement (GPP) for products with significant environmental impacts and products and services that contribute the most to consumption of key global resources water, land, materials and carbon, as laid down in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap, and urges the Commission to assess where GPP could be linked to EU
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas intense resource use and dramatically increased global consumption are pushing up prices of raw materials, with real commodity prices having increased by 147% since the turn of the century; whereas the EU is likely to face severe challenges in securing access to, and the uninterrupted supply of, key resources; whereas efficient use of raw materials in industry and at political level is recognised to be crucial to meeting these challenges;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for stronger requirements on Green and Sustainable Public Procurement (GPP) for products with significant environmental impacts and urges the Commission to assess where GPP could be linked to EU-
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for stronger requirements on Green Public Procurement (GPP) for products with significant environmental impacts and urges the Commission to assess where GPP could be linked to EU- funded projects; calls for efforts to promote joint procurement and networks of public procurement officers in support of GPP by the end of this year, without generating additional administrative costs;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasizes the urgent need to improve energy and environmental labelling in order to create incentives for eco-friendly products;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Reiterates the value of including resource use in product information and eco-labels and urges the Commission to integrate all existing labels as far as possible, thus providing a complete overview for consumers on e.g. resource use, energy use, corporate social responsibility, source of origin, eco- innovation, material use and recyclability;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies and to identify those cases in which feedback might pose problems, with a view to remedying them as quickly as possible;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis,
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies; calls on the Commission to encourage waste management practices especially in countries where waste recycling leaves something to be desired;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies; reiterates that targets that have already been set in several Directives regarding the collection and separation of waste, should be further elaborated and set for the highest and most qualitative recovery of materials in each of the phases of recycling: collection, dismantling, pre-processing and recycling/refinery;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies; within this framework, calls on the Commission to take specific initiatives to facilitate the release of unused Community resources, especially for countries facing financial problems;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies and plans;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take more effective action to combat illegal shipments of waste to non-EU countries and, in particular, to strengthen the appropriate monitoring systems; suggests that a ‘European external waste policy’ be established with a view to spreading the best European waste treatment standards beyond the confines of the EU;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the Commission to investigate opportunities in setting up EU-wide extended producer responsibility schemes to drive performance in all Member States including those where reuse and recycling rates are much lower than the EU average;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Member States to tighten up controls intended to prevent the illegal shipment of waste, in particular hazardous waste, to non-EU countries;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to focus on significantly reducing food waste; calls on the Commission to propose measures aimed specifically at halving food wastage by 2025;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive landfill ban, accompanied by appropriate transition measures; is of the opinion that a landfill tax – as has already been introduced by some Member States – could also help to achieve the above ends;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline and fully implement the waste acquis and to i
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas intense resource use
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive landfill ban, accompanied by appropriate transition measures; calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to address the electronic and electric equipment waste through the establishment of recycling centres and best-practice sharing techniques on a regional basis.
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to streamline and fully implement the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that existing landfills could serve as raw material depots (urban mining), but that there is little in the way of research findings on that subject;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take steps to combat the illegal shipment of waste, in particular hazardous waste, to non-EU countries, in accordance with the Waste Shipment Regulation and the Basel Convention;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas intense resource use, physical and geological restrictions on supply, and dramatically increased global consumption are pushing up prices of raw materials, with real commodity prices having increased by 147% since the turn of the century; whereas the EU is likely to face severe challenges in securing access to, and the uninterrupted supply of, key resources;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on Member States to expand their work on guidelines for the development of standards for recycled materials through the European Committee for Standardization (CEN);
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to further develop standards for the treatment of waste on the basis of Life Cycle Analysis thinking and the waste hierarchy to further reduce the amount of recoverable and recyclable waste going to the landfill until its phasing out at the end of this decade;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to ensure policies drive cascading use of natural raw materials and favouring highest value added and resource efficient products over energy generation, taking into account in particular ghg mitigation potential;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Highlights the importance of EU funding giving priority to activities higher up the waste hierarchy, as stipulated in the Waste Framework Directive (e.g. priority to recycling plants over waste disposal);
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to set up a program to create awareness and provide guidance to companies, especially SME's;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Commission to present measures for securing environmentally sound collection, pre-processing and recycling of raw materials per category;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Stresses that to be meaningful a lifecycle approach must be based on accounting which is as accurate as possible; in this context insists that in the implementation of Fuel Quality Directive suppliers apply a separate default value for tar sands;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Commission and Member States for effective action against illegal waste shipments to third countries, especially of hazardous waste.
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Calls on the Commission, by the end of 2012, to propose a new Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policy framework, which should be accompanied by a legislative proposal addressing priority products and services with the relevant tools, including mechanisms that improve supply chain resource efficiency;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, chemistry, farming, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use; points out that granting tax credits (deductions from tax payable) would also benefit research, development, and innovation activities;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas switching the economy onto a resource-efficient path which respects planetary boundaries and allows for global population growth and the numbers living in future industrialised nations will bring increased competitiveness and new sources of growth and jobs through cost savings from improved efficiency, the commercialisation of innovations and better management of resources over their whole life cycle;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, water management, chemistry, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, chemistry, agriculture, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, chemistry, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use; calls on Member States to consider reviewing the status of already closed mines and potential reopening of some of these mines if there are enough viable economic and environmental reasons for reopening them;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of research, development and innovation for speeding up the transformation to a resource- efficient Europe; notes that greater innovation is particularly needed in environmentally friendly material extraction, chemistry, recycling, re-use potential, and the substitution of environmental impacting material, technologies and design for less material and energy use; stresses, however, that every effort must be made to avoid damaging the EU's competitiveness and increasing the risk of 'carbon leakage';
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Considers that EU support serves to point the way and should therefore be used as a matter of priority for projects relating to higher rungs of the waste hierarchy;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase the transparency of publicly financed research, remove the bureaucratic obstacles to participation in research programmes aimed at enhancing resource efficiency, and involve SMEs to more useful effect in innovation research;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to review how forests are regulated. It is important that forest-based raw materials are not regulated in such a way that it becomes so complicated and expensive to produce and use them that they are replaced by non-renewable resources;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, together with the business community and civil society, to devise strategies to foster continuing acceptance of technology and innovation;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas switching the economy onto a resource-efficient path which respects planetary boundaries
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards a share of environmental taxation in public revenues
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States, having due regard for the specific situation in each EU economy, to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues accounting for an EU average of more than 10% by 2020, in line with the best performing Member States; emphasises that this will allow for cuts in other taxes such as on labour, increase competitiveness and create a level playing field;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift more strongly towards environmental taxation
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas recycling amounts to more than the collection of recyclable waste and whereas it is therefore essential for every step along the value chain to be encompassed within future measures;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues accounting for an EU average of more than 10% by 2020, in line with the best performing Member States; emphasises that this will allow for cuts in other taxes such as on labour, increase competitiveness
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues accounting for an EU average of more than 10% by 2020, in line with the best performing Member States, and, in addition, to use indicators to monitor and compare the effects of this instrument; emphasises that this will allow for cuts in other taxes such as on labour, increase competitiveness and create a level playing field;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the Commission to promote a cascading approach to the use of biomass, favouring recycling, highest value added and resource efficient products, such as bio-based products and industrial materials, over bioenergy;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers it important to design the tax rules for environmental taxation so as not to harm trade, in order to ensure that resources are used as efficiently as possible;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Urges Member States to design the tax system for environmental taxation in such a way as to avoid distortion in the use of scarce resources. For resources to be used efficiently, different sectors using the same types of raw materials must have uniform taxes so that one sector cannot overexploit resources that could be used more efficiently;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission and Member States, as quickly as possible, to draw up a clear definition, based on objective criteria, of ‘environmentally harmful subsidies’ and to present concrete plans for phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies before 2020;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission and Member States to present concrete plans, within not more than five years, for phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission and Member States to pr
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the Environment Council conclusions on the Commission’s Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe adopted on 19 December 2011 (18786/11)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas it is essential for the EU swiftly to come out of the recession or economic stagnation currently obtaining in various Member States, and whereas simpler, leaner legislation plays a decisive role in economic recovery;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission and Member States to present concrete plans for phasing out
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – point 1 (new) (1) Urges Member States to consider the establishment of centres for innovation technologies to support the extraction, recycling and re-use of useful components from mining waste products and to facilitate the subsequent use of mining waste products, located in various types of waste repositories, in the construction industry and the handling of these waste storages in an environmentally safe way
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises that markets stimulate resource efficiency if prices reflect the true cost of resources used;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give more active support in future to scientific research to assess the economic value of ecosystems or ecosystem services and, in
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to lay greater emphasis on public education, especially as regards waste sorting and proper use of secondary raw materials, bearing in mind that dissemination of the right knowledge within society directly influences European resource efficiency habits;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas a future holistic resource policy should no longer merely distinguish between ‘renewable’ and ‘non-renewable’ resources, but should also extend to ‘sustainable’ materials;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Endorses the Commission's commitment in the Roadmap to developing market-based instruments to enable negative externalities to be included in market prices thereby reflecting the true cost of using resources and their environmental impacts;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Highlights the importance of the notion of cascading use of resources, and the importance of mainstreaming the notion into relevant policies, ensuring our scarce raw materials are hierarchically used to their full potential;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Emphasises that biodiversity is essential to the existence of human life and the well-being of societies, both directly and indirectly, through the ecosystem services it provides; welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy up to 2020
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Accordingly welcomes the fact that special measures have been drawn up to control invasive species and calls for them to be implemented without delay, bearing in mind the harmful effects that such species have on natural resources (soil, forests, groundwater, etc.);
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. stresses the importance of water as a natural resource that is vital for both humankind and ecosystems; recalls the increased pressure on the availability and quality of safe and secure water resources due to factors like deforestation, urbanisation, population and economic growth and climate change; highlighting the need of multi-level approach in managing our water resources, emphasizing the role of local and regional authorities in the context of the Flagship Initiative for a Resource Efficient Europe.
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Urges the Commission to also calculate and disclose the cost of the environmental damage arising as a consequence of the EU’s agriculture and fisheries policy;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to start pilot projects for several resources, e.g. phosphorous,
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to start pilot
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to start pilot projects for several resources, e.g. phosphorous, to reach
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Eurobarometer of March 2011 shows that resource efficiency and sustainable production and consumption are key concerns of EU citizens; whereas it will not be possible in any event to progress towards sustainability unless citizens become directly involved as a result of a change of attitude and a change in society’s habits where resource use is concerned;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to draw up appropriate criteria and start pilot projects for several resources, e.g. phosphorous, to reach 100% reuse in 2020; emphasises that these pilot projects should receive direct funding from structural funds;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to start pilot projects for several resources,
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, dietary
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and diminishing imported land use; Calls for more concrete actions to reduce food waste as this would also reduce demand for water in agriculture, thereby addressing the interlinked problems of food security and water security.
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the growth in demand for agricultural output as a result of an increase of the world's population in the coming decades will have considerable implications on land use and natural ecosystems,
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, pasture farming, water efficient grazing systems, dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and diminishing imported land use;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, particularly in view of the potential impact of Peak Oil on industrialised food production, and of dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and diminishing imported land use;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Points to the need to give a Community character to soil protection measures and therefore calls once again for an end to the deadlock regarding the adoption of the soil framework directive;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Draws attention to the role of renewable natural resources, such as forests, in resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to encourage the use of renewable, bio-based, recyclable, and environment-friendly raw and other materials; points out in particular that the use of low-emission renewable materials, such as wood, for building purposes is resource efficient;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Believes that consumer awareness plays a crucial role in improving resource-efficiency in food consumption and supports initiatives at local, national and EU levels to promote more sustainable food consumption patterns such as dedicated vegetarian meal days
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Emphasizes that nutrient losses to the environment through agricultural production creates heavy external costs for ecosystems, human health and the climate, calls for the Commission to introduce modern nutrient management techniques to reduce nutrient losses as production intensifies;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas securing access and uninterrupted supply of resources is a growing challenge due to the increase in resource consumption, water and land use;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Points out that more than 20% of food is disposed of as refuse and calls for specific measures to curb waste; points out that it is not only food which is wasted, but also the resources used for food processing and packaging;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear sectoral targets, including an overall target, in order to implement the vision and the
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear sectoral targets,
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent,
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear sectoral targets, including an overall target, in order to implement the vision and the milestones of the Roadmap; calls on the Commission to bring forward a concrete proposal for such targets for the EU by 2013 at the latest and to ensure that all EU policies are consistent with the targets set;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear sectoral
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. calls on the Commission to enforce the full implementation of existing legislation, with particular respect to water legislation, in order to exploit all opportunities to the fullest extent possible.
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Believes that greater consumer awareness is crucial in achieving resource-efficiency in food consumption and encourages initiatives at local, national and EU levels which aim at promoting more sustainable food consumption patterns such as the Veggie Thursday in Belgium.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Economical growth is a precondition to resource efficient investments;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop and to subsequently deploy resource accounting to be integrated in EU and national budgets in all their chapters (each corresponding to an activity), which in turn may be broken down into articles, and those in turn, where necessary, into items;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Urges the Commission to adopt robust and easily understandable indicators, which should be based on integrated accounting tools and explicitly laid down to apply in all parts of Europe, in order to monitor progress towards the targets;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Urges the Commission to adopt robust and easily understandable indicators, based on integrated accounting tools, in order to monitor progress towards the targets; those indicators should measure the volume of the various types of resources entering the economy and enable the economic, geo- strategic and environmental aspects of resource scarcity to be addressed;
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Urges the Commission to adopt
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Urges the Commission to adopt robust and easily understandable indicators, based on integrated accounting tools, in order to monitor progress towards the targets, and with the aim of making a group of identified key resource indicators binding for private and public actors alike;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Supports the proposal by the Commission to devise and, as soon as possible, to establish a lead indicator comp
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Supports the proposal by the Commission to establish a lead indicator complemented by a set of indicators on land, water, materials and carbon; underlines that these must be based on a footprint approach that takes the full life cycle impacts into account, one which integrates hidden flows, namely possible transfers of environmental pressures outside the EU and scarcity and dependency shifts;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Supports the proposal by the Commission to establish a
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Supports the
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Supports the proposal by the Commission to establish a
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas realising and monetising the value of nature and the ecosystem services it provides is crucial for a transition to a resource efficient economy;
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to define, by 2013, the criteria to be met for specific substances or objects to be regarded as by-product and not as waste, hence providing the pointers that Member States must follow in the process to support the free movement of goods and eliminate inequalities and barriers in the treatment of economic operators.
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Underlines that specific resource efficiency indicators are crucial in all areas of policy and calls on the Commission to integrate resource efficiency indicators into all its impact assessments; also considers that a ‘fitness check’ along the lines set out in Commission communication COM(2010)0614 should be a mandatory part of every impact assessment;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Underlines that specific resource efficiency indicators, a list of which is to be put forward by the Commission, are crucial in all areas of policy and calls on the Commission to integrate resource efficiency indicators into all its impact assessments;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to screen EU policies, and assess inter alia the National Renewable Action Plans and Common Agricultural Policy, regarding their impact on resource efficiency;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Considers that the 7th EAP should be aimed at achieving the vision
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Considers that the 7th EAP should
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Considers that the 7th EAP should be aimed at achieving the vision and milestones of the Roadmap towards a resource-efficient Europe and transforming the milestones into targets accordingly;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Considers that the 7th EAP should also be aimed at achieving the vision and milestones of the Roadmap towards a resource-efficient Europe;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Maintains that efficient use of resources is frequently hampered by cumbersome administrative procedures; calls on the Commission to simplify authorisation processes, to enable resource efficiency to be implemented to better effect;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that EU eco-innovation stimulates greater resource efficiency outside our borders, thereby reducing the depletion of global resources; therefore urges Member States to strengthen their national resource efficiency strategies and
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Open and free trade is one of the key instruments for ensuring the efficient use of resources.
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission on the Transparency Directive, following the US Dodd-Frank bill and urges the Commission to include sustainability criteria;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Considers a resource-efficient Europe to be a suitable framework for creating green jobs for all, and without discrimination.
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop public information and education campaigns aimed at increasing the take-up of products made from recycled waste.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. Competitiveness of the industry allows new investments to more efficient technology;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts from the Commission, Member States, industry and civil society and develop European Resource Efficiency Action Plans with
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Making raw materials available for Europe’s future well-being – Proposal for a European innovation partnership on raw materials’ (COM(2012)0082),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts from the Commission, Member States, industry and civil society and develop European Resource Efficiency Action Plans with clear
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts from the Commission, Member States, local authorities, industry and civil society and develop, within one year, European Resource Efficiency Action Plans with clear
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts of
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Member States to transpose the existing legislation on waste as a matter of urgency in order to establish the necessary conditions for a functioning market;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to develop a chain of custody system, subjected to appropriate impact assessments, that instructs producers throughout the entire chain to use a transparent system to record the use of resources, allowing for more intelligence in the use of resources;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to encourage more partnerships between actors throughout the value chains based on a good understanding of the value chain's characteristics, challenges and hurdles.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) – having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety on the review of the 6th Environment Action Programme and the setting of priorities for the 7th Environment Action Programme – A better environment for a better life,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013; calls also therefore for the creation of an ´
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials and reuse market and to foster the demand for reuse and recycled materials
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the supply of, and the demand for, recycled materials and by- products by developing end-of-
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013; calls also therefore for
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2012 on how to avoid food wastage: strategies for a more efficient food chain in the EU1, __________________ 1 P7_TA-PROV(2012)0014.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013; calls also therefore for
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013; calls
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges the European Commission to research the development of a hierarchy model to ensure the highest added value of resource use without compromising the environment in analogy with the Report on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe (2011/2056(INI)); calls on the EC to map the competition for the same materials and to address non-essential consumption of resources;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to make clear that the collection and treatment of separately collected waste for recycling from private households should not be entrusted only to public undertakings;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to clarify that the collection and treatment of separately collected waste for recovery from private households cannot be seen as a service of general interest (SGI), with which only public undertakings can be entrusted.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Urges the Commission to examine the effects of a tax on resources and virgin raw materials, and in particular on any side effects, such as non sustainable substitution, tax evasion or a shift of economic activities to third countries and to present proposals for EU instruments to this effect in line with the resource efficiency priority; the taxation of resources must serve the purpose to promote reuse and recycling instead of the extraction of virgin materials and would help shift the tax burden from labour to resources;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Reiterates that more vigorous monitoring of the implementation of waste legislation is needed;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to boost research and technological innovation to speed up the transition to a green economy; underlines that the ‘Innovation Union’ is one of the engines for a resource-efficient Europe; calls on the Commission to set up an online ‘best practice’ data bank in the resource efficiency field, which should be accessible without difficulty to citizens and businesses as a whole and help to disseminate potential solutions and new ideas and translate them into reality;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the current economic
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to boost in particular basic research and technological innovation to speed up the transition to a
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the Commission to boost research and technological innovation to speed up the transition to a green economy; underlines that the ‘Innovation Union’, especially the European innovation partnership on raw materials, is one of the engines for a resource-efficient Europe;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to act as quickly as possible – publishing the grounds for their decision- making – to develop and use clear, robust, and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012 and to look into the possibility of revising the Waste Statistics Regulation in order to provide a sound and reliable basis on which to promote recycling;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity in consultation with key stakeholders that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the consequences ensuing from a dearth of resources, for example rising prices, are particularly hard to bear for people with less income and in less favoured regions; and whereas, therefore, there is a greater need than ever for synergy between social and environmental policies;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 201
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012 and to harmonise waste calculation methods and statistics with a view to promoting recycling;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012, as well as to consider a revision of the Waste Statistics Regulation in order to have a sound basis to foster recycling;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges the Commission and Member States to develop and use clear and measurable indicators for economic activity that take account of climate change, oil depletion, biodiversity and resource efficiency by the end of 2012;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the proposal by the Committee of the Regions on the possibility of adopting a ‘basket’ of four resource use indicators, namely land footprint, use of raw materials (biodiversity and biological and mineral resources), water footprint, and greenhouse-gas footprint);
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, after carrying out comprehensive impact assessments, to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non-
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, if it intends to propose to extend the scope of the eco- design directive
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non- energy related products and to come forward with additional eco-design requirements on the performance of products, including recyclability and recycled content, durability, reparability and reusability
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the over
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the eco-design directive
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non- energy related products and to come forward with additional eco-design requirements on the performance of products, including recyclability and recycled content, durability and reusability
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission neither to extend the
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non- energy related products and to come forward with additional eco-design requirements on the performance of products, including recycl
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission, before taking any steps to extend the scope of the eco- design directive to non-
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the eco-design directive to non- energy related products and to come forward with additional eco-design requirements on the overall resource efficiency and performance of products, including recycled content, durability, carbon content and reusability, in order to improve their environmental impact and promote recycling markets;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for environmental information requirements to be extended to cover conventional mass consumer goods; supports national tests for environmental labelling and urges the Commission to work on developing a harmonised European method for calculating a product’s environmental footprint, with a view to providing consumers with more information on products not covered by existing schemes such as the eco- labelling, energy labelling and organic farming labelling schemes;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Maintains that sustainable use of raw materials helps not only to promote economic growth, but also to preserve the environment, and that it should therefore be integrated as comprehensively as possible into other EU policy areas;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the over-use of natural resources leads to environmental degradation and destruction of the earth’s natural capital and also affects human health and well-being;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that resource efficiency is a cross-cutting issue; calls on the Commission to integrate this agenda into other policies, especially the overarching governance economic policies, such as Europe 2020.
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are coherently aligned to them;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are aligned to them; recommends that the Commission should ensure that a stable legislative framework is maintained so as not to jeopardise long-term investment, and should propose that legislation that proves to be ineffective, superfluous or an obstacle to economic recovery and growth should be repealed;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are aligned to them; recalls the fact that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential to improve Europe's competitiveness and reduce its resource dependency;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are aligned to them
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the fact that decoupling economic growth from resource consumption is essential to improve Europe's competitiveness and reduce its resource dependency;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission, by the end of 2012, to propose a new Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) policy framework, establishing a process to identify those priority products or services that contribute the most to key global consumption areas water, land, materials and carbon to be coherent with the consumption indicators as laid down in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap accompanied by legislative proposals addressing priority products and services with the relevant tools, including mechanisms that can improve supply chain resource efficiency, and the possibility to set minimum requirements or best performance benchmarks through implementing measures;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
source: PE-485.854
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-480778_EN.html
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdf |
events/5/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.223&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-467223_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.080&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-467080_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.765&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-462765_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.877New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-480877_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.854New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-485854_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.855New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-485855_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.778&secondRef=03
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0021/COM_COM(2011)0021_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-161&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0161_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-223New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0223_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/05435New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0021:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0021:EN
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
procedure/subject/6 |
Old
3.70.03 Climate change, ozoneNew
3.70.03 Climate change, ozone layer |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|