Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | PROUST Franck ( PPE) | GIEREK Adam ( S&D), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE), JADOT Yannick ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | SIPPEL Birgit ( S&D) | Thomas HÄNDEL ( GUE/NGL), Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | VLASÁK Oldřich ( ECR) | Nathalie GRIESBECK ( ALDE), Keith TAYLOR ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria ( S&D) | Marielle DE SARNEZ ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano ( S&D) | Thomas HÄNDEL ( GUE/NGL), Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
- 2.10.03 Standardisation, EC/EU standards and trade mark, certification, compliance
- 3.20.06 Transport regulations, road safety, roadworthiness tests, driving licence
- 3.40.03 Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
- 3.40.14 Industrial competitiveness
- 3.45.03 Financial management of undertakings, business loans, accounting
- 3.45.08 Business environment, reduction of the administrative burdens
- 3.50.01 European research area and policy
- 3.50.04 Innovation
- 3.50.08 New technologies; biotechnology
- 3.60.05 Alternative and renewable energies
- 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
- 3.70.03 Climate policy, climate change, ozone layer
- 3.70.07 Noise pollution
- 4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
- 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
- 8.40.07 European Investment Bank (EIB)
- 8.70 Budget of the Union
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry.
Members endorsed the Commission’s new strategy of launching a new European industrial policy, in particular for a sustainable automotive industry . However, they expected the Commission to coordinate its own efforts more efficiently , in order to ensure that the CARS 2020 recommendations actually become operational and are monitored by the High Level Group.
The Commission was called upon to:
· draw up a clear schedule of fast-track measures and to use its right of initiative, notably by drawing up guidelines, in order to coordinate and build on action by Member States and firms, focusing on economic and employment growth and market recovery;
· take into consideration the entire automotive sector, in particular subcontractors, retailers and aftermarket firms, in all future policy-making processes involving the sector.
Member States, for their part, were asked to carry out properly coordinated and structural reforms geared to enhancing competitiveness, such as (i) support for research and innovation, (ii) competence building, (iii) staff retraining, (iv) lowering indirect costs, (v) enhancing labour flexibility based on social dialogue, and (vi) cutting red tape and shortening payment periods.
Automotive industry and production in the EU : Members regretted that the Commission failed to analyse the fundamental causes of the decline affecting the sector, such as the widely varying circumstances in the industry and the large number of structural changes. They considered that, alongside Europe-wide cross-cutting action, measures specifically tailored to individual circumstances need to be taken at both national and European level in order to stimulate demand.
Deploring the fact that the Commission failed to address the issue of over-capacity , despite the fact that it is a problem shared by the whole of the industry, Parliament called ton the Commission to submit at the earliest opportunity: (i) a study on the scale of over-capacity in Europe and the best practice in addressing this problem; (ii) an action plan setting out all the policy tools available in this area; (iii) proposals for more active and coordinated support for workers and companies.
As regards restructuring , Members called on the Commission and Member States to develop conversion plans in a coordinated fashion so as to support regions facing swingeing job losses in the automotive sector. They called for integrated use to be made of all European-level instruments (EIB, ESF and ERDF) and national instruments so as to assist the workers affected and redirect them towards alternative employment in related sectors, e.g. alternative energy.
Human resources : bearing in mind that the labour market is out of step with the industry's requirements, Members considered it essential to adapt not just public training strategies , but also firms' training strategies, in order to anticipate tomorrow’s needs and to enable firms to attract and hold on to highly qualified workers. They called on Member States to make the legislative adjustments required for more open and constructive social dialogue.
Innovation and technology : Members stressed the need to encourage research and development focusing on low-carbon and sustainable technologies . They wanted such technologies to be brought onto the market.
Members believed that EU efforts should be based on a differentiation strategy relying on a number of priorities geared towards consolidating Europe’s technological advantage, including:
· technological convergence, in particular as regards standards for the stages upstream of production and distribution;
· the development of eco-innovations (vehicles that are lighter, more efficient, less polluting), safety (eCall) and accessibility (uses for drivers with a disability);
· cooperation at EU and international level in areas that have been under-exploited to date, such as power-train technology;
· strengthening Europe’s leadership in international standard setting;
· infrastructure roll-out for electric cars and alternative fuels.
Regulation: Parliament stressed the need to: (i) reinforce current EU legislation on statutory guarantees; (ii) harmonise technical regulations across the EU in order to guard against any artificial distortions of competition; (iii) step up cooperation within the single market through European standardisation, certification, unification and disposal, and also through voluntary market segmentation.
Financial resources : the resolution recommended bolstering the use of the financial resources available to stimulate investment in sustainable mobility over and above public subsidies, by means of tax incentives for SMEs (tax credits for research, CO2 emissions tax-and-rebate schemes,) and both private funding instruments (risk capital funds,) and public funding instruments (European Investment Bank). Members called for a conditionality clause to be introduced, under which automotive firms in receipt of investment support for a given site would be required to keep their operations at that site until the end of the depreciation period and to refund the EU subsidies should they decide to relocate.
Internal market : Members pointed out that a robust internal market was a precondition for a return to competitiveness and sustainability in the automotive industry. They considered closer European approximation essential in areas in which the prevailing conditions militate against a level playing field:
· vis-à-vis non-EU competitors: high prices for energy and raw materials, strong euro exchange rate;
· on the internal market: social and fiscal competition, tax breaks for firms and incentives for buyers (low-carbon incentives, vehicle scrappage schemes);
· in the EU internal market: conditions relating to the recyclability of vehicles and the ecological recycling of used cars;
External markets : Parliament pointed out that many of our automotive firms are becoming less competitive as a result of growing competition – some of it unfair – from non-EU firms. The Commission was urged to reorganise its trade policy, so as to be able to:
· coordinate Member State measures for promoting EU firms and protecting EU products, investment and intellectual property rights outside the EU;
· centralise all EU export instruments;
· gradually make the principle of reciprocity a central tenet of trade relations;
· push for the dismantling of non-tariff barriers in the automotive sector.
· shorten the time taken to instigate investigations and apply trade defence instruments;
Parliament asked the Commission to extend its ex ante impact assessments on future trade agreements to the notion of competitiveness in the automobile sector.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Franck PROUST (EPP, FR) on CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry.
Members endorsed the Commission’s new strategy of launching a new European industrial policy, in particular for a sustainable automotive industry . However, they expected the Commission to coordinate its own efforts more efficiently, in order to ensure that the CARS 2020 recommendations actually become operational and are monitored by the High Level Group.
The Commission was called upon to:
· submit a study showing the mismatch between what it wishes to achieve and the tools available to it, as the basis for a debate within the Council and Parliament;
· develop cross-cutting roadmaps that cover development in the energy sector, the transport sector and the ICT sector;
· take into consideration the entire automotive sector , in particular subcontractors, retailers and aftermarket firms, in all future policy-making processes involving the sector.
Member States, for their part, were asked to carry out properly coordinated and structural reforms geared to enhancing competitiveness, such as support for research and innovation, competence building, staff retraining, lowering indirect costs, enhancing labour flexibility based on social dialogue, cutting red tape and shortening payment periods.
Automotive industry and production in the EU : Members regretted that the Commission failed to analyse the fundamental causes of the decline affecting the sector, such as the widely varying circumstances in the industry and the large number of structural changes. They considered that, alongside Europe-wide cross-cutting action, measures specifically tailored to individual circumstances need to be taken at both national and European level in order to stimulate demand.
Deploring the fact that the Commission failed to address the issue of over-capacity , despite the fact that it is a problem shared by the whole of the industry, the report called ton the Commission to submit at the earliest opportunity: (i) a study on the scale of over-capacity in Europe and the best practice in addressing this problem; (ii) an action plan setting out all the policy tools available in this area; (iii) proposals for more active and coordinated support for workers and companies.
As regards restructuring , Members called on the Commission and Member States to develop conversion plans in a coordinated fashion so as to support regions facing swingeing job losses in the automotive sector. They called for integrated use to be made of all European-level instruments (EIB, ESF and ERDF) and national instruments so as to assist the workers affected and redirect them towards alternative employment in related sectors, e.g. alternative energy.
Human resources : bearing in mind that the labour market is out of step with the industry's requirements, Members considered it essential to adapt not just public training strategies , but also firms' training strategies, in order to anticipate tomorrow’s needs and to enable firms to attract and hold on to highly qualified workers. They called on Member States to make the legislative adjustments required for more open and constructive social dialogue.
Innovation and technology : Members stressed the need to encourage research and development focusing on low-carbon and sustainable technologies , including electric and hybrid vehicles, alternative fuels, mobile energy storage. They wanted such technologies to be brought onto the market.
Members believed that EU efforts should be based on a differentiation strategy relying on a number of priorities geared towards consolidating Europe’s technological advantage, including:
· technological convergence, in particular as regards standards for the stages upstream of production and distribution;
· the development of eco-innovations (vehicles that are lighter, more efficient, less polluting), safety (eCall) and accessibility (uses for drivers with a disability);
· cooperation at EU and international level in areas that have been under-exploited to date, such as power-train technology;
· strengthening Europe’s leadership in international standard setting;
· infrastructure roll-out for electric cars and alternative fuels.
Regulation: the report stressed the need to: (i) launch an ex-post assessment on adopted legislation and on the lack or bad implementation of adopted legislation; (ii) reinforce current EU legislation on statutory guarantees; (iii) harmonise technical regulations across the EU in order to guard against any artificial distortions of competition; (iv) step up cooperation within the single market through European standardisation, certification, unification and disposal, and also through voluntary market segmentation.
Member States were asked harmonise the use of the financial resources available to stimulate investment in sustainable mobility over and above public subsidies, by means of tax incentives for SMEs.
Internal market : Members pointed out that a robust internal market was a precondition for a return to competitiveness and sustainability in the automotive industry. They considered closer European approximation essential in areas in which the prevailing conditions militate against a level playing field:
· vis-à-vis non-EU competitors: high prices for energy and raw materials, strong euro exchange rate;
· on the internal market: social and fiscal competition, tax breaks for firms and incentives for buyers (low-carbon incentives, vehicle scrappage schemes);
· in the EU internal market: conditions relating to the recyclability of vehicles and the ecological recycling of used cars;
Lastly, regarding external markets , Members pointed out that many of our automotive firms are becoming less competitive as a result of growing competition – some of it unfair – from non-EU firms. The Commission was urged to reorganise its trade policy , so as to be able to: (i) coordinate Member State measures for promoting EU firms and protecting EU products, investment and intellectual property rights outside the EU; (ii) gradually make the principle of reciprocity a central tenet of trade relations; (iii) push for the dismantling of non-tariff barriers in the automotive sector.
PURPOSE : to present an Action Plan for a competitive and sustainable automotive industry in Europe (CARS 2020).
BACKGROUND : the automotive industry is of strategic importance to the European economy. The sector represents around 12 million direct and indirect jobs and delivers a sizeable positive contribution to the EU trade balance (growing over the last few years and reaching € 90 billion in 2011). The industry records the biggest private spending on research and innovation (€ 28 billion in 2009) and is an essential driver for technological innovation. It is an important multiplier of growth , due to strong economic linkages with many industrial sectors.
The automotive sector is today at an historic turning point : production and trade patterns are shifting and the climate agenda is becoming more urgent. At the same time, road safety remains an important concern.
In the past months, the European automotive industry has been facing an increasingly difficult period , with the EU market for new cars declining for the fifth consecutive year. Several manufacturers have reported financial losses on the EU market mostly due to declining sales combined with the long-standing structural issue of overcapacity.
At the end of 2010, the Commission decided to re-launch the CARS 21 High Level Group , which was originally set-up in 2005, as a follow-up of the Commission Communication " European strategy on clean and energy-efficient vehicles ", adopted on 28 April 2010.
Against this background, the Group has defined a common view on key characteristics of a strong and competitive automotive industry and progress towards sustainable mobility for EU society in 2020 as follows :
· an automotive sector which remains of strategic importance and a cornerstone for the EU industry and economy;
· a strong manufacturing base in the EU for road vehicles and components, manufacturing a sizeable part of the vehicles and parts sold on the EU market;
· a strong industrial network with a flexible and integrated supply and distribution chain;
· a sector exporting a larger portfolio of high-quality and high-technology vehicles to third markets;
· global markets which offer a genuine level playing field to all players in the sector, with fair chances for all technologies;
· an automotive industry that is leading in technology, in coordinated action with the fuel supplier industry, producing vehicles which are attractive to EU consumers, clean in terms of regulated pollutants, more fuel-efficient, safe, quiet and connected ;
· a portfolio of propulsion technologies, dominated by advanced combustion engine technology, though increasingly electrified. In addition, the deployment of vehicles with alternative powertrain concepts (such as electric5 and fuel cell vehicles) is becoming significant;
· appropriate refilling and recharging infrastructure for alternative fuel vehicles being built, in line with their market potential;
· a workforce in both manufacturing, R&D and servicing that is trained and prepared to work with a multitude of technologies.
The Commission fully recognises these challenges and the need of an ambitious industrial policy strategy for the automotive sector . With this strategy, the Commission intends to support the active role the automotive sector will play in seeking to reverse the declining share of industry in Europe from its current level of around 16% of GDP to as much as 20% by 2020.
CONTENT : based on recommendations by the CARS 21 High Level Group, the Communication presents an Action Plan for the automotive industry , highlighting the Commission's commitment to support the sector's competitiveness and sustainability. It is the first concrete example of the application of the updated vision for industrial policy in a sectoral setting, i.e. the automotive industry. This Action Plan is articulated around the following four pillars :
(1) Investing in advanced technologies and financing innovation : through a range of regulatory initiatives and support to research and innovation :
· to develop a proposal on the European Green Vehicles Initiative (as a follow-up to The European Green Cars Initiative which is one of the three Public Private Partnerships (PPP) 2009-2013) under Horizon 2020 ;
· to continue working with the EIB in order to ensure that financing for automotive research and innovation projects is available;
· to establish a set of measures aiming to lower CO2 emissions, pollutants and noise emissions ;
· to continue to implement road safety work in line with the focus areas and objectives of its Policy Orientations 2011-2020 and further promote the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS);
· to adopt, as part of the Clean Power for Transport package, a legislative proposal on alternative fuel infrastructure , concerning the deployment of a minimum refuelling/recharging infrastructure and common standards for certain fuels, including electric vehicles .
(2) Improving market conditions : through :
· strengthening the internal market : (i) setting up a dialogue between stakeholders, encouraging them to work towards common principles on vertical agreements on the distribution of new vehicles ; (ii) putting forward guidelines for financial incentives for clean and energyefficient vehicles put in place by Member States in order to promote stronger coordination of these measures ;
· a comprehensive and consistent application of principles of smart regulation , will be ensured, integrating an indepth assessment of the impacts on industry, society and other stakeholders, notably the associated costs and benefits ;
· adopting a proposal to enhance the type-approval framework to include provisions for market surveillance in areas where a need has been identified.
(3) Enhancing competitiveness on global markets : through :
· an effective trade policy : take full account of the importance of maintaining a strong and competitive automotive manufacturing base in Europe when conducting its trade policy, using both multilateral and bilateral tools. Both should be used to tackle the key issues of removing tariff and non-tariff barriers ;
· the international harmonisation of vehicle regulations : the 1958 UNECE Agreement should be modernised to accommodate the needs of emerging economies and to the extent that it enables the mutual recognition of international whole vehicle type approvals (IWVTA) starting with the category of passenger cars.
(4) Anticipating adaptation and managing restructuring : while on the one hand, the automotive industry faces the problem of availability of a qualified workforce, on the other hand there is a need to deal with the social consequences of restructuring, when job losses are unavoidable. The Commission will:
· encourage the use of European Social Fund (ESF) for workers' retraining and re-skilling;
· continue to monitor/ review restructuring activities as regards to their strict compliance with EU legislation, in particular concerning state aid and internal market rules ;
· identify good practice and promote an anticipative approach in restructuring in consultation with representatives of the automotive-intensive regions, employment authorities and the sector's stakeholders, including the social partners.
The Commission proposes to set up in 2013 a high-level process called CARS 2020 , in order to monitor the implementation of the CARS 21 recommendations, as well as the measures set out in this Action Plan.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0547/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0391/2013
- Committee opinion: PE514.598
- Committee opinion: PE510.607
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.523
- Committee opinion: PE514.643
- Committee opinion: PE510.661
- Contribution: COM(2012)0636
- Committee draft report: PE513.268
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0636
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE513.268
- Committee opinion: PE510.661
- Committee opinion: PE514.643
- Committee opinion: PE510.607
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.523
- Committee opinion: PE514.598
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Contribution: COM(2012)0636
Activities
- Roberta ANGELILLI
- Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paolo BARTOLOZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Preslav BORISSOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
337 |
2013/2062(INI)
2013/06/20
IMCO
52 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital -A (new) -A. having regard to Parliament’s resolution of 15 January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring, in particular the request that the Commission should submit a legislative proposal on the basis of those recommendations,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Emphasises that the production and finishing of vehicles as an industrial product are at the end of a value chain essentially comprised of European supplier industries and that these upstream industries are also subject to the European-level and global challenges that confront the automotive industry. The European automotive supply sector not only innovates, thereby stimulating the development of European vehicles of the future, but also creates its own ancillary market for spare parts. This ancillary market and the operators within it merit as much attention as the finished vehicles market and the automotive manufacturers, and they should thus be on an equal footing with regard to the pooling and managing of product information;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that small and medium- sized component suppliers to the European original equipment manufacturers play an important role for the development of the automotive industry; further points out that SMEs in the sector are key innovators and regrets that many of them experience difficulties in accessing resources through the European Investment Bank; calls for the improvement of this situation, notably through providing easier access to funds available under the COSME Programme (Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the creation of a common market for tuning and spare parts is rendered impossible by national regulations. Urges the Commission to bring forward proposals for harmonising and further developing this sector;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel vehicles,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel vehicles, and urges that priority be given to
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel vehicles, and urges that priority be given to the development of appropriate infrastructures through adequate investments at European and national level, and through common standards for alternative fuels and propulsion systems – an example of such an approach being the swift adoption of the legislative proposal and of a common standard on the recharging interface for electric vehicles;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel and electric vehicles, and urges that priority be given to the development of appropriate infrastructures and to supporting relevant technologies through adequate
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel vehicles, and urges that priority be given to the development of appropriate infrastructures through adequate investments at European and national level, and through the swift adoption of the legislative proposal and of a common standard on the recharging interface for electric vehicles; reminds that it is important to maintain a positive attitude towards innovative alternative solutions for powering electric vehicles, such as the fuel-cell technology.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposal for strengthening the market for alternative fuel vehicles, and urges that priority be given to the development of appropriate infrastructures through adequate investments at European, including through adequate funding in the Connecting Europe Facility instrument, and national level, and through the swift adoption of the legislative proposal and of a common standard on the recharging interface for electric vehicles;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital -B (new) -B. having regard to Parliament’s resolution of 3 July 2012 on eCall: a new 112 service for citizens,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the proposal to develop a fuel labelling scheme, providing consumers with easy-to-understand information on the compatibility between their vehicles and the fuels on offer;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. With the objective of a better functioning single market, it is necessary to widen European standards based on the production of certified spare parts and components approved within the EU;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the development of the European automotive industry
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the development of the European automotive industry cannot rely on export alone but should also focus on boosting domestic demand, through public and private investments and the enhancement of European citizens’ purchasing power; stresses that the nature and level of public investment must not have the ultimate effect of undermining the sector’s long-term competitiveness through excessive state support;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that different kinds of measures to facilitate the purchasing of new and fuel-efficient, low emission vehicles exist in various Member States; encourages the exchange of such good practices; calls on Member States to consider innovative tax policies in order to foster EU citizens to purchase new and environmentally friendly cars;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for stronger coordination of demand-side measures, including financial incentives and taxation policy, both on vehicles and fuels; asks the Commission to follow the guidelines on financial incentives with more binding actions to ensure a level playing field and contribute to the competitiveness of the industry across the EU; considers that demand-side measures, but also measures relating to day-to-day costs and conditions, should steer consumers towards safer and greener vehicles;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for stronger coordination of demand-side measures, including financial incentives and taxation policy, both on vehicles and fuels; asks the Commission to follow the guidelines on financial incentives with
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for stronger coordination of demand-side measures, including financial incentives and tax
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for stronger coordination of demand-side measures, including financial incentives and taxation policy, both on vehicles and fuels; asks the Commission to follow the guidelines on financial incentives with more binding actions to ensure a reasonably level playing field and contribute to the competitiveness of the industry across the EU;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a European action plan for
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of public intervention to ensure that the negative social consequences of any restructuring in the sector are kept to a minimum;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of public intervention to ensure that the negative social consequences of any industrial restructuring in the sector are kept to a minimum;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of public intervention to ensure that the negative social consequences of any restructuring in the sector are kept to a minimum or eliminated; attaches particular importance to long-term planning for structural change so as to ensure that, if labour requirements change, the level of skills will be such as to secure employment, and that the transition to new forms of production and business models will be gradual; believes that a European framework for anticipating change and softening the social impact of restructuring, including a legislative act, is necessary, also in order to avoid any distortions to the internal market;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of proportionate and targeted public intervention to ensure that the negative social consequences of any restructuring in the sector are kept to a minimum; believes
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the existence of the Globalization Adjustment Fund and of the European Social Fund and calls for their optimal and targeted use in cases of restructuring in the automotive sector, notably for re-training, re-skilling, re- locating affected workers and assisting concerned regions.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the introduction of new propulsion technologies and alternative fuels implies major restructuring in the value chain of which vehicles are the end product, and that in some cases this can adversely affect workers who are part of that value chain; asks the Commission, therefore, to conduct a proper social impact assessment in respect of this technological restructuring in the EU internal market;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take measures to ensure a high level of
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take measures to ensure a high level of consumer protection, transparency and security also in the second hand car market, and to work towards a gradual phasing out of polluting and less safe vehicles, asks the Commission to standardize the regulations of ecological recycling of used cars;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a European action plan for the automotive industry must follow a holistic approach, complementing regulation with infrastructure investments and actions to boost demand and enhance human capital; believes, in this context, that investments in advanced technologies, including measures to improve road safety, tackle CO2 and reduce pollutant and noise emissions, are vital to support the creation of added value and jobs; notes the high level of energy costs in the energy- intensive upstream sectors such as steel and chemicals, and therefore urges that the action plan be coordinated inter alia with EU energy policy, in the interests of keeping the automotive sector competitive;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take measures to ensure a high level of consumer protection, transparency and security also in the second hand car market, and to work towards a gradual phasing out of polluting and less safe vehicles; exemption shall be made for vehicles of historical interest as defined in Regulation 2012/380/EU1.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the EU internal market must make room for and support the keepers, owners and drivers of historic vehicles and the businesses and employees who work on them because, with the number of historic vehicles rising steadily, their maintenance, use and conservation are important not only in terms of culture and tourism but also for the economy; emphasises, however, that there should be a restrictive definition of historic vehicles so that, as their numbers continue to grow, the negative – but currently quite limited – safety and environmental implications inevitably particular to historic vehicles that do not meet new- vehicle standards should remain limited;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Asks the Commission to respond to the problem of misleading consumers through
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Asks the Commission to respond to the
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls that regional and local authorities, depending on their competences, have various tools to actively support the automotive industry, notably in the area of promoting electric cars through parking space management and providing administrative support for investment in alternative fuels infrastructures; encourages such practices to be exchanged on European level and effectively coordinated; calls EU funds to be used in targeted and optimised way, in accordance with the specific development requirements of the region concerned;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Insists that current safety standards, particularly for L-class vehicles, be tightened, and that the safety requirements and under-run protective systems for lorries be improved.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Requires the European Commission and Member States to put more efforts in road safety, bringing forward actions on vehicles, infrastructures and driver behaviour sides; in this context recalls the European Parliament Resolution of 3 July 2013, calling for a swift adoption of the e-call system and containing precise requests regarding data protection, clarity on the responsibilities of the several actors involved, technological neutrality, transparency for the consumers; recalls furthermore the demand of the Parliament for the e-Call system to be based on an interoperable and open- access platform for possible future in- vehicle optional applications or services compliant with safety, security and data protection privacy standards, allowing open choice for customers and open access for service providers;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Confirms its support for a review of the type approval framework and looks forward to collaborating with the Commission and encouraging stakeholder dialogue during this process;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Points to the need for a constructive, transparent and respectful relationship to be maintained between the various stakeholders in the motor vehicle industry, in particular between manufacturers and their dealers and for imbalances in favour of the stronger party in the relationship, which could have an adverse effect on consumers as well, to be avoided;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the EU internal market is the most important factor in terms of ensuring a healthy future for the automotive industry: firstly, as a market for vehicles, it sets common technical standards, on behalf of 500 million consumers, on environmental performance, road safety, product safety and noise emissions, and these are valid and important for other industries beyond its borders; secondly, it is home to public and private research establishments offering cutting-edge research and thus helping to give the automotive industry a promising future;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Welcomes the Commission's intention to carry out proportionality tests on the implementing measures proposed for existing legislative requirements; notes that its concerns over the anti-tampering and evaporative emissions requirements on L category vehicles have been explicitly recognised;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Underlines the importance of international regulatory harmonisation in underpinning the global competitiveness of the European car industry; supports the reform of the 1958 UNECE agreement, and the development of an international type approval system (IWVTA); calls on the Commission to engage Parliament more fully to ensure political support from global partners to raise the profile of these crucial projects;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Deplores the decision of the Conference of Presidents to bar the engagement of MEPs in the CARS 2020 discussions; notes that many other representative organisations and Member State politicians are involved; demands that the Conference of Presidents review this decision in the light of the important proposals on the future of the car industry being developed in the CARS 2020 framework; notes that as any legislation evolving from CARS 2020 will be closely examined and approved by the Parliament, participating in policy groups does not undermine Parliament's independence.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines that ambitious investment at European level should be put in place to support the proposed strategy, including through Horizon 2020, EIB financing and European Social Fund;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the existence of the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation - Horizon 2020 - and calls for easier access to its funds; stresses the importance of investing in research and innovation in order to remain competitive on the global market in all areas of the automotive sector, namely in road safety, quality customer service, environmentally-friendly mobility, advanced technologies and high added value products; encourages the use of funds from the European Investment Bank in order to finance such projects;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament to foresee that the legislative framework regulating the automotive sector is flexible enough in order to rapidly react on and cover all new technological developments and innovations, which underpin the competitiveness of the automotive industry;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underscores the fact that the EU internal market should help to further not only the manufacture and sale of vehicle products but also the recyclability of vehicles and vehicle parts and the raw materials used in them;
source: PE-514.565
2013/07/16
INTA
53 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the Union’s automotive industry, directly or indirectly generating 12 million jobs in Europe, is of strategic importance to the economy and
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 h (new) 1h. Stresses the necessity of a greater electrification of the transport sector in the following decades, in accordance with other EU policies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 i (new) 1i. Recognises, that demand in the emerging markets will not only grow in the luxury category, but in the lower segments as well, therefore the competitiveness of the European industry in these segments will be more important;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that the industry is an essential driver for technological innovation and an important multiplier of growth; considers that maintaining a high level of innovation is vital for the industry in order to keep its leading edge in sustainability, technology and international competitiveness; calls on the Commission and Member States to improve their cooperation at European and international level in areas that have been under-exploited to date, such as power- train technology and step up their efforts to consolidate Europe’s leading position in international standard setting, thus ensuring that we can maintain a technological lead on world markets; stresses that public transport networks, traffic mobility and the technical breakthroughs of smart cities are powerful leverages for boosting the competitiveness of the European automotive sector; and highlights the role that public procurement can play in this regard;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that the industry is an essential driver for technological innovation and an important multiplier of growth; considers that maintaining a high level of innovation is vital for the industry in order to keep its leading edge in sustainability, technology and international competitiveness; stresses that public transport networks, traffic mobility and the technical breakthroughs of smart cities are powerful leverages for boosting the competitiveness of the European automotive sector; and highlights the role that public procurement can play in this regard; stresses the vital importance of a clear-cut and stable legal and fiscal framework to encourage investment in the automobile sector;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that the industry is an essential driver for technological innovation and an important multiplier of growth; considers that maintaining a high level of innovation is vital for the industry in order to keep its leading edge in sustainability, technology and international competitiveness; considers that clean car designs would reduce Europe’s energy dependence on third countries; stresses that public transport networks, traffic mobility and the technical breakthroughs of smart cities are powerful leverages for boosting the competitiveness of the European automotive sector; and highlights the role that public procurement can play in this regard;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that the industry is an essential driver for technological innovation and an important multiplier of growth; considers that maintaining a high level of innovation is vital for the industry in order to keep its leading edge in sustainability, technology and international competitiveness; simultaneously points out that the current high level of technology advancement of the EU should be utilised and built upon, and should not be unnecessarily compromised by the unbalanced "race for innovation"; stresses that public transport networks, traffic mobility and the technical breakthroughs of smart cities are
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that the industry is an essential driver for technological innovation and an important multiplier of growth; considers that maintaining a high level of innovation is vital for the industry in order to keep its leading edge in sustainability, technology and international competitiveness; stresses that public transport networks, traffic mobility and the technical breakthroughs of smart cities are powerful leverages for boosting the competitiveness of the European automotive sector; and highlights the role that public procurement can play in this regard when used as a strategic tool for industrial policy;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that th
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that unilateral strategies to reduce labour costs have been misdirected. Labour costs in the automotive industry account for between just 13 and 20 percent of added value. Global competitiveness can only be guaranteed by means of innovation throughout the whole production chain and flexibility in the production processes, and this must accordingly be negotiated with the workers.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the Union’s automotive industry is of strategic importance to the economy and employment in the EU and points out that it delivers a sizeable positive contribution to the EU’s trade balance; notes at the same time, however, that many of our automobile companies are losing ground as a result of increased and sometimes unfair competition from third-country firms;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b(new) 2b. Deplores the negative trends of losing the competitiveness in the Union's automotive industry in recent years, due to rising manufacturing costs; an issue largely resulting from imposing increasingly restrictive safety and environmental standards, whereby their application is not mirrored at non-EU car producers; points out that the higher prices of EU cars have an obvious adverse effect on the sales volumes on the EU market;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Stresses the need to invest in the design and manufacture of new products, creating innovative technologies designed for global consumers with a view to supporting the growth of the wider EU value chain,
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Stresses that the environmental challenges ahead are important drivers for innovation; reminds that further technological progress needs to be made in order to improve the environmental efficiency of vehicles, while fostering the development and the market up-take of alternative-fuel vehicles, such as electric vehicles; reminds also that technical regulation aiming at further CO2 emissions reduction needs to make further progress;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Stresses that an EU strategy for the automotive sector needs to be consistent with other EU policy objectives such as the reduction in CO2 emissions and other objectives related to climate change; therefore calls for an increased funding for public research in sustainable public mobility and for a general and fundamental shift towards public transport; to that end calls for the reconversion of closed plants or those threatened with closure to the production of public transport vehicles;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Recalls that necessary and large scale innovation in the interest of sustainable production in the car industry is often hampered by the lack of a long term perspective and planning due to increased competitive pressures on an international scale and the drive for short term profit; underlines that this development goes against the interests of workers, consumers and the environment;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Endorses the consensus of the CARS 21 High Level Group that the Union’s trade policy should take full account of the importance of maintaining a strong and competitive automotive manufacturing base
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Endorses the consensus of the CARS 21 High Level Group that the Union's trade
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Endorses the consensus of the CARS 21 High Level Group that the Union’s trade policy should take full account of the importance of maintaining a strong, innovative and competitive automotive manufacturing base and
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Concurs with the Commission that it is essential for the European automobile sector to adapt its skills if it is to remain commercially competitive at international level; welcomes the creation of a European industrial skills council in the automobile sector and the envisaged recourse to the European Social Fund, EIB and EGF; urges the Commission accordingly to indicate without delay the specific measures to be taken, together with a timetable for the implementation thereof;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. In light of the current crisis in the car industry and increased competitive pressures on workers' wages and conditions, partly brought about by existing free trade agreements and potentially aggravated through the signing of new free trade agreements between the EU and third countries, underlines the need of trade unions to develop an international strategy to defend jobs and conditions of workers employed in the car industry; is of the opinion that this strategy needs to include a radical plan to reorganise the car industry in the interests of working people and the environment based on the nationalisation of the industry under the democratic control and management of the workers, trade unions and the state;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises, that the EU market for new cars is declining, but at the same time the demand for clean powered vehicles (electric, hybrid, plug-in) is increasing;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs); believes that the Union's trade agreements and negotiations should involve significant commitments on removing NTBs that affect the EU's automotive sector, and should secure access to imported raw materials, such as rare metals;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs) and promoting reciprocity as regards market access; believes that the Union’s trade agreements and negotiations should involve significant commitments on removing NTBs that affect the EU’s automotive sector;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs); believes that the Union’s trade agreements and negotiations should involve significant and reciprocal commitments on removing NTBs that affect the EU’s automotive sector;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs); believes that the Union’s trade agreements and negotiations should involve significant commitments on removing NTBs that affect the EU’s automotive sector; calls on the Commission progressively to establish the principle of reciprocity regarding our trade relations in the automobile sector;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs); believes that the Union’s trade agreements and negotiations should involve significant commitments on removing NTBs that affect the EU’s automotive sector; stresses that the industrial property rights, plans, designs and patents of European companies must be protected effectively and respected by all the Union’s partner countries;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of multilateral and bilateral negotiations aimed at reducing and dismantling tariff as well as non-tariff barriers (NTBs); believes that the Union's trade agreements and
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls upon the Commission to continue its efforts towards global standardisation. The EU’s trade partners ought to accept the UNECE’s WP.29 standards and new, universal solutions must be found for innovative technologies such as a universal plug for electric cars.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for the application of seasoned impact assessment studies for the industry prior to conclusion of free trade negotiations with economically strong EU partners in order to avoid any deterioration of the EU automobile sector;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Recognises the importance of speeding up the development of a proposal for a new Regulation on the mutual recognition of international whole vehicle type approvals and spare parts for repair and maintenance, in order to reduce administrative burdens related to the introduction of the same vehicle model in third country markets;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that the European automobile industry has been in decline for four successive years and calls for the very prompt implementation of CARS2020 measures;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses that international frameworks for cooperation on standards and technical regulations should remain the preferred option for seeking harmonisation thereof and that all bilateral initiatives have to be developed with a view to their multilateralisation, also including emerging economies; in such context, the EU has to continue improving its environmental requirements and to try and set the most advanced international norms on that basis;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Welcomes the initiative taken in the framework of the Transatlantic Economic Council to launch the work on a Global Technical Regulation on the safety and promotion of electric vehicles and stresses the importance of attracting a broad membership including the EU's main trading partners such as Japan, China and Canada;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to make sure that all commitments in trade negotiations and
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to make sure that all commitments in existing and future trade negotiations and agreements are efficiently fulfilled; calls on the Commission to promptly adopt necessary measures if these commitments are not honoured;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Investment activity in growth markets must be strengthened and safeguarded by means of trade agreements.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Union wherever necessary to make use of Community Trade Defence Instruments in accordance with WTO rules and resort more often to the dispute-settlement mechanism to preserve its automobile industry; welcomes the complaint registered by the Commission with the WTO regarding the ‘recycling fee’ imposed by Russia on imported foreign vehicles;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c.Welcomes the complaint registered by the Commission with the WTO in respect of the unprecedented increase in vehicle import duties in Russia and urges it to combat through arbitration, international law or trade agreements any tariff or non- tariff barriers depriving European manufacturers of an adequate foothold on emerging markets or the markets of other third countries;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. EU standards regarding CSR and employee participation should also be implemented by European companies in third countries to which investment is being channelled, and regional development should be promoted.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission to prepare an assessment regarding the impact of the Union’s trade agreements currently in force and those under negotiation, based on specific and defined criteria, and to evaluate their cumulative effect on the competitiveness of our automotive industry.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks the Commission to provide it with a list of the agreements it intends to evaluate, together with an evaluation timetable; requests also details regarding the procedures to be followed and the way in which stakeholders will be involved;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Urges the Commission to develop a strategic vision on its industrial policy as soon as possible, which would help those industrial sectors that are affected by structural overcapacities, such as the automotive sector, to anticipate trends by converting themselves into the sectors of the future, such as 0-CO2-emission public transports;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to step up their cooperation regarding the position of automobile companies on outside markets; urges them in particular to focus on the promotion of SMEs, centralise data of relevance to them through the creation of one-stop-shops throughout Europe and formulate a strategy for their inclusion in EU missions.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Welcomes the Commission initiative, while at the same time believing firmly that more proactive measures must be taken without delay, particularly to promote innovation, employment and support for companies in this sector and EU trade policy, in order to preserve the European automobile industry in the face of international competition.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Recognises the low domestic demand for cars in the EU; underlines that low demand, particularly in the so-called peripheral countries, is a direct result of the economic and social crisis in Europe, aggravated by the severe austerity policies carried out across Europe which undermine the purchasing power of European citizens and increase already existing overcapacities with massive job losses as a result;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Points out, that by 2050 nearly 60% of the new cars sold worldwide will be hybrid, plug-in or electric cars, according to the International Energy Agency;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Underlines that a slow down in the world economy and in China in particular will further reduce the prospect for an increase in exports of European car producers and therefore highlights the need for an alternative strategy for the European car industry;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 g (new) 1g. Stresses, that European producers are left behind in the market of clean powered vehicles, but national targets support further growth of this market;
source: PE-514.848
2013/07/23
EMPL
44 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for enhanced efforts to be made to implement the EU 2020 objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by promoting a stronger European industry; stresses in this context the importance of maintaining a strong automotive manufacturing base in Europe, also by exporting a larger portfolio of high- quality and sustainable technology vehicles to third countries;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that research, development, and innovation are becoming increasingly important, especially as regards the need to develop low-emission energy-efficient cars, to enable Europe to remain competitive and hence boost employment by reducing its dependence on imported energy, and the need to integrate IT into cars so as to make them more pleasant and safer to drive;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recognises that electric vehicles have growth potential, not just as far as energy sustainability and climate action are concerned, but also because they can generate economic growth and employment; calls, therefore, for efforts to be brought to bear with a view to developing and improving vehicles of this type and encouraging their use within the EU; considers that, to that end, it will be necessary to set up refuelling or recharging facilities for vehicles that run on alternative fuels;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Welcomes the Commission’s proposed Horizon 2020 and COSME programmes, which will provide financial support enabling businesses and SMEs to enhance their competitiveness as Europe moves towards an environment-friendly, resource-efficient transport system;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Strongly supports the actions proposed in the fourth pillar of the Action Plan; reiterates its call for
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Strongly supports the actions proposed in the fourth pillar of the Action Plan; reiterates its call for a legal act on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring; attaches particular importance to long-term planning for structural change designed to ensure that, if labour requirements change, skill levels will be such as to secure employment and the transition to new forms of production and business models will be gradual;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Strongly supports the actions proposed in the fourth pillar of the Action Plan; underlines the need for long-term strategies permitting enterprises and employees to adapt to structural transformations, while anticipating change and minimising social impact; reiterates its call for a legal act on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring1; __________________ 1 European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2013 with recommendations to the Commission on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring (2012/2061(INI)).
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In the context of better regulation, calls on the Commission to be more systematic in assessing the impact of its proposals on the ability of Europe’s automotive industries to remain competitive on an international level, and thus provide many new jobs on which Europe relies; in this regard urges the Commission actively to discourage ‘gold- plating’ of EU law at the national level;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Action Plan for the automotive industry and notes the strategic importance of the automotive industry to the European economy, representing around 12 million direct and indirect jobs, delivering a sizeable positive contribution to the EU trade balance of around €90 billion (in 2011), being the biggest private spending on research and innovation (around €30 billion in 2010), as well as being an essential driver for technological innovation;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to anticipate restructuring processes in order to save jobs, foster internal and external mobility, and minimise possible adverse effects of those processes; calls on the Member States to enforce national law and existing EU directives effectively, including the Collective Redundancies Directive, the Transfer of Undertakings Directive, and the Information and Consultation Framework Directive, without infringing the subsidiarity principle; considers that EU funds should play a major role in averting, minimising, or mitigating such adverse effects as might be entailed in restructuring processes;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Maintains that when restructuring is unavoidable, plant closures or downsizing should be considered only as a last resort; accordingly believes that, in such cases, information should be supplied to, and negotiations conducted with, stakeholders, including trade unions, workers’ representatives, and company representatives, with a view to reaching an agreement serving to ensure the company’s viability while respecting the workers’ rights;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Urges the Member States, in the event of plant closures or significant downsizing, to make full use of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. S
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Supports the creation of a European Automotive Skills Council, promoting relevant higher education and vocational training by bringing together national organisations, the education sector and social partners in order to promote skills development and employment in the automotive sector;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of social dialogue for skills adaptation and restructuring processes and the need to follow best pratice2; recalls positive examples for the development of temporary, innovative instruments during the crisis, such as short-time work, helping to maintain previous employment levels; __________________ 2 ‘Checklist for Restructuring Processes’ in Commission Communication of 3 June 2009 ‘A shared commitment for employment’, COM (2009)0287.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages Member States to adopt
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers a skilled workforce to be vital if the European automotive sector is to be competitive and built on quality; believes, therefore, that education and training systems must be modernised with a view to upgrading the skills needed for the future through new curricula, ICT, and partnerships with employers;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points out that the ESF has a key role to play as regards both the retraining and reskilling of workers and improvements in lifelong learning, which should be oriented in particular towards green vehicles;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. whereas an ambitious European industrial policy in Europe with a strong emphasis on local employment and the development of green technologies is a necessary lever for a job-intensive recovery and boosting sustainable growth;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for even better use to be made of EURES in conjunction with Member States’ employment agencies, and, in this respect, supports the use of EURES as a complementary tool not only as a means of advising workers and job- seekers on their right to free movement, but also as a labour market instrument with a special focus on placement;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for even better use to be made of EURES, and, in this respect, supports the use of EURES not only as a means of advising workers and job-seekers on their right to free movement, but also as a labour market instrument with a special focus on placement, thereby enhancing the ability of European car manufacturers to access the skilled labour supply that they need;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for even better use to be made of EURES, and, in this respect, supports the use of EURES not only as a means of advising workers and job-seekers on their right to free movement, but also as a labour market instrument with a special focus on placement in permanent full-time employment enabling workers to live their own lives;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for even better use to be made of EURES, and, in this respect, supports the use of EURES not only as a means of advising workers and job-seekers on their right to free movement as well as to employers, but also as a labour market instrument with a special focus on placement;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the European Social Fund to be used for the retraining and reskilling of workers, a
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the European Social Fund to be used for the retraining and reskilling of workers,
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the European Social Fund to be used for the retraining and reskilling of workers, and for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to be used as a short-term measure in the event of plant closures and significant downsizing; calls, however, as regards the longer term, for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to be replaced by an instrument incorporated within the European Social Fund, so as to enable support for persons who have lost their jobs to be delivered more rapidly and more efficiently to the intended recipients, as recommended by the Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 7/2013.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Maintains that the development of environment-friendly new automotive technologies – to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, for example – could both guarantee the long-term economic success of the car industry and enable jobs to be secured on a lasting basis.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. whereas dynamic and inclusive labour markets, where people possess high and market-relevant skill levels, are essential for the competitiveness of the European economy and social cohesion;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that social impact assessments and considerations should be mainstreamed with regard to all industrial policies; underlines that social insecurity has negative consequences for innovation, productivity and creativity of the workforce and thus also for economic growth;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Notes that technological innovation and green growth are key competitiveness factors; stresses that public funding should foster innovation in the European industry, including in the car industry, e.g. through the EIB; underlines that these measures should be made conditional on their capacity to create ecological added value and sustainable quality employment within the EU.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Maintains that whenever restructuring is to take place, at whatever level, the social partners should be involved at an early stage and that, as regards the role of national trade unions and their European umbrella organisations and federations, the detailed information to be supplied and the say which should correspondingly be accorded to them regarding personnel changes could to some extent be provided for under European transnational company agreements;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Urges the Commission, the Member States, and all other stakeholders not to treat the four pillars of the Action Plan as areas to be pursued separately, but rather to integrate the fourth pillar (‘Anticipating adaptation and managing restructuring’) into the other three as a cross-cutting task.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Notes that integration of the fourth pillar (‘Anticipating adaptation and managing restructuring’) into the other three, as regards changes in workforce size, structure, and skills requirements, could be factored into the restructuring process from the outset in the form of a holistic ‘social mainstreaming’ approach; notes that experience shows that such an approach, for the most part, produces speedier and better results for the stakeholders concerned.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points to the importance of standing out from the global marketplace in terms of quality and safety; considers it necessary, therefore, to invest in advanced technologies and emphasise innovation;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘eCall’ proposal, relating to a system enabling vehicles to call emergency services automatically in the event of a serious accident;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. With a view to fostering greater integration within the EU, maintains that the adaptations enabling vehicles to be used by drivers with a disability should be improved in terms of their performance and accessibility;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls for the health and safety standards set out in the ‘Community Strategy on Health and Safety at Work 2007-2012’ to be improved so as to keep pace with changes in the different types of work and tasks; to that end, calls on the Commission to submit a European health and safety strategy for 2020 as soon as possible;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for enhanced efforts to be made to implement the EU 2020 objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by promoting a stronger European automotive industry;
source: PE-514.814
2013/09/27
ITRE
188 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the automotive industry is a
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Europe’s automotive industry needs to become competitive and productive once again; it must, however, be kept in mind that the automotive industry includes not only the production of automobiles, but an entire chain of actors comprising 4.7 million people involved in the production and delivery of competitive replacement parts and equipment, as well as the repair, maintenance, inspection and servicing of vehicles;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses the need to continue to pursue an ambitious approach to the funding of the green car initiative and SME development, which are clear priorities, while repeating its stress on their gradually introduction, taking into account the differences between Member State infrastructure levels;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses the need to continue to pursue an ambitious approach to the funding of
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Stresses that integrated innovation projects covering the whole value chain are crucial for improved competitiveness;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to change framework guidelines for companies that are SMEs to receive preferred status with subsidies and grants
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need for the principle of smart implementation of regulation to be implemented at the earliest opportunity; points out that, although this was one of the recommendations of the first ‘CARS 21’ group (2005), no action has been taken in this area to date;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to place a moratorium on
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to place a moratorium on all new legislation that could cause the economic situation in the industry to deteriorate; insists, furthermore, that the Commission forgo fresh legislation once and for all;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Stresses the importance of reasonable lead-times to enable the industry to adapt production facilities and invest in the industrial system;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Europe’s automotive industry
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for any policies and decisions already in place that could hamper
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Member States to ensure fairness and transparency in commercial relations between manufacturers and dealers through compliance with a code of conduct, as indicated in paragraph 7 of Commission notice 2010/C 138/05, regarding supplementary guidelines on vertical restraints in agreements for the sale and repair of motor vehicles and for the distribution of spare parts for motor vehicles. The code should contain at least provisions regarding the relocation of manufacturing activities, multi-branding and compensation entitlements for unjustified termination of a contract by the manufacturer;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on European manufacturers to uphold and reinforce current EU legislation on statutory guarantees;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Takes the view that commercial guarantees for European automotive products are too short-term and are incommensurate with their high levels of reliability, and that this puts them at a profound competitive disadvantage in relation to the commercial guarantees offered by third-country manufacturers (e.g. Japan and South Korea);
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Considers it essential for technical regulations to be harmonised across the EU in order to guard against any artificial
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Encourages European enterprises involved in producing automotive products to step up their cooperation within the single market through European standardisation, certification, unification and disposal, and also through voluntary market segmentation;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls for the EU and the Member States to
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Europe’s automotive industry needs to become competitive and productive once again
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls for the EU and the Member States to harmonise, optimise and bolster the use of the financial resources available to stimulate investment in sustainable mobility over and above public subsidies, by means of tax incentives for SMEs (tax
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Considers it essential for complementarity to be maintained between the funding available for restructuring and that available for R&D; calls, accordingly, for the funding allocated to the European Social Fund and the European
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Points out that a robust internal market is a precondition for a return to
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Takes the view that the cost leadership strategy currently affecting European and global manufacturers operating on the European market should be expanded, by means of a network of authorised facilities, to include the operating costs of those manufacturers’ products, and that this should be a precondition for their entry onto the market and serve as a means of building a competitive advantage;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Calls for a ‘made in Europe’ quality label to be introduced for vehicles having 80% of their value produced within the European Union;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – introductory part 34. Considers
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – introductory part 34. Considers
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas one solution to the problem of excess production capacity is to convert capacity to other sectors of industry, such as public transport and renewable energy, and to invest in sustainable infrastructure;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a. vis-à-vis non-EU competitors:
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point a a. vis-à-vis non-EU competitors: high energy and raw materials prices
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point b Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point b b. on the internal market: labour standards, tax breaks for
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point b b. on the internal market:
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – point b a (new) ba. Believes that building Europe’s competitive advantage in the disposal of used cars should be an important element in the cost leadership strategy, and that the cost of this should be borne by the automotive industry through official dealers and networks of authorised facilities; feels that disposal and recycling costs necessitate European solidarity and the introduction of mandatory standards for disposal, given that the EU’s poorer Member States are burdened in this respect by the large number of older vehicle models in circulation originating in the ‘old EU’ Member States;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Calls on the Member States, in the absence of an agreed solution at EU level, to take appropriate measures to implement the provisions of paragraph 7 of the supplementary guidelines on vertical restraints in agreements for the sale and repair of motor vehicles and for the distribution of spare parts for motor vehicles contained in Commission Notice 2010/C 138/05, so as to ensure contractual relations between dealers and automobile manufacturers based on fairness, transparency and compliance with the principles of good faith;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – introductory part 35. Deplores the fact that, on the aftermarket, legal fragmentation is currently having an adverse effect on
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – introductory part 35. Deplores the fact that, on the aftermarket, legal fragmentation is currently having an adverse effect on motorists and hampering fair and healthy competition within the industrial production system and between Member States; believes that legislation in this area should be fully harmonised
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas fossil fuels in our vehicles are among the most important causes of greenhouse gas emissions and environmental problems in the form of exhaust gases and particles which cause far too many early deaths;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a a.
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a a (new) Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point a b (new) Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point b Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point b Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 – point b a (new) ba. coordination at EU level to step up efforts to combat the import of counterfeit spare parts;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Notes the need for greater transparency in commercial relations between manufacturers and dealers; takes the view that the introduction of a code of conduct for manufacturers and dealers would be a reliable way of achieving this; considers that this code should at least include clauses relating to dealer relocation, multi-branding and compensation entitlement for unjustified termination of the contract by the manufacturer in line with the supplementary guidelines contained in Commission Notice 2010/C 138/0;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas road transport operators should significantly reduce their emissions if we are to achieve the desired environmental and climate targets;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Draws attention once again to the economic benefits for Europe to be gained from the
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Considers that any company relocating to the European Union should benefit from tax incentives provided that it creates new jobs and a total increase in workforce. A special loans fund should be set up for relocations to be funded equally by the banks and the Member States;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Underscores the importance of smart specialisation strategies to establish a framework for intra-EU competition in the same areas of activity to give way to complementary regional specialisations making the EU more competitive vis-à-vis third countries;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Takes the view that governments, public companies and the armed forces should buy or lease only vehicles having 80% of their value produced within the European Union;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point a a. Member States to the alternative means of
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point a a. Member States to the alternative means of stimulating demand that are available
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point a a. Member States to the alternative means of stimulating demand that are available (labelling schemes
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point a a (new) aa. Urges the Member States, alongside automotive enterprises, to take regulatory steps on their domestic markets in order to stimulate demand for automotive products;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Endorses the Commission’s new strategy of placing industry, in
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point b b. firms to the various marketing tools available (insurance including loan reimbursement in case of unemployment
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point b a (new) ba. Takes the view that for the European automotive industry to be competitive, it has to become profitable by helping to develop industries that cooperate to supply cheap inputs from within Europe, such as: steel, castings, forgings, upholstery, tires and electronic components;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point b b (new) bb. Expresses its regret that the CARS 2020 action plan focuses primarily on European car manufacturers while ignoring the significance of the entire aftermarket sector, its actors and needs; feels that European automotive policy must be more expansive and be based on a holistic approach; asserts that the main objective should be to ensure a level playing field for all participants along the chain; takes the view, therefore, that European automotive industry policy ought also to incorporate provisions adapted for all of the actors – from major manufacturers to SMEs – in the distribution and repair chain;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 a (new) 37a. Calls on the Commission to produce policies on developing and rolling out multimodal models for commuter traffic, including incentives for environment- friendly company cars in conjunction with public transport modes;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Points out that exports to emerging markets are clearly a
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Considers that all investment outside the European Union that would harm employment production and added value within Europe through the reimporting of vehicles or equipment should be subject to a tax on these reimports; considers that the funds collected through this tax should be used to assist with the design and conception of vehicles adapted to the needs of developing countries;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 b (new) 38b. Considers that a system of quotas for each importing country at the European Union's borders should allow imports to be regulated; European groups importing vehicles manufactured outside the European Union should have these vehicles taxed at a rate of 10%, the proceeds of which should go to European fund for research into manufacturing clean vehicles;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Welcomes the Commission’s announcement that a breakthrough has been reached in work on a free-trade zone with the USA and Japan and on equal access to global markets, which means that all participants in the global automotive market will have to adhere strictly to the same rules; takes the view that this increases the likelihood that sustainable development and improvements in road safety will become the basis for achieving competitive advantage throughout the world;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 b (new) 38b. Recalls that it is now necessary in the euro zone to re-examine the macro-economic tools for shaping global competitiveness (e.g. exchange rates) in order that the production of important vehicle models (such as BMW) is not transferred to third countries;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 c (new) 38c. Acknowledges that a uniform international certification system which enables the inspection of vehicles and automotive parts across the single European market and which is based on EU environmental and safety standards could play a key role in eliminating unfair competition;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Endorses the Commission’s new strategy of placing industry, in
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Takes the view that investment activity in growth markets must be strengthened and secured by trade agreements;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 b (new) 38b. Demands that investment in third states should mean that CSR standards and EU worker stakeholder standards will also be applied by EU firms in third states and regional development will be promoted;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – introductory part 39. Points out that many of our automotive firms
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point a a. coordinate Member State measures for promoting EU firms and protecting EU products and intellectual industrial property rights patents outside the EU;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point b b. centralise all EU export instruments, in particular those geared to SMEs (Small Business, Big World), for example through the creation of a comprehensive, accessible and sectoral digital platform;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point b a (new) ba. Include a ‘local content’ clause in public procurement for the most innovatory vehicles in terms of energy efficiency and environment protection;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point c Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point c a (new) ca. press ahead with the global standardisation process. The EU’s trade partners ought to accept the UNECE’s WP.29 standards and new, universal solutions must be found for innovative technologies such as a universal plug for electric cars;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point d d
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point d d
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that, according to the STOA ‘Eco-efficient transport’ study, the creation of an eco-efficient transport system is being hampered by a number of non-technical barriers relating to financing, planning and implementation, as well as the high costs of alternative propulsion technologies;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point d d.
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point e Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point e e. shorten the time taken to instigate investigations and
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point f Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point f Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 – point f – introductory part f. gauge the impact of free-trade agreements (FTAs) on EU automotive manufacturing as accurately as possible by identifying the automobile industry as a priority sector, for example:
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Calls on the Commission to examine what combined influence all the trade agreements that have been negotiated have had on the competitiveness of the European automotive industry, and to what extent these free trade agreements are compatible with the fundamental rights of workers under the relevant ILO conventions.
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Highlights the need for adequate financial resources to be provided under the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014–2020 for the restructuring of the sector and to upgrade and modernise its micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, to increase productivity and promote nationally-produced goods from the sector;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers there is a need for wide- ranging debate in order to forge a new European industrial policy for the automotive sector that will be respectful of the environment and will promote job creation, regional development and new wealth creation;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Expects the Commission to coordinate its own efforts more efficiently, in order to ensure that the CARS 2020 recommendations actually become operational and the failure of the first phase of the CARS 21 process (December 2005), when the conclusions reached were not followed by the necessary action, is not repeated; calls, accordingly, on the Commission to draw up a clear schedule of fast-track measures and, within its remit, to use its right of initiative, notably by drawing up guidelines, in order to coordinate and build on action by Member States and firms;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to develop cross-cutting roadmaps that cover development in the energy sector, in the transport sector and in the ICT sector;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that action by the Commission in this area is being hampered by
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that action by the Commission in this area is being hampered by a lack of po
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that the Commission should take into consideration the entire automotive sector, in particular subcontractors, retailers and aftermarket firms, in all future policy making processes on the sector.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the industrial policy conclusions adopted by the Competitiveness Council at its meeting in December 2012; urges the Member States to pursue their stated aim of overhauling industrial policy in the automotive sector and firming up new arrangements for Europe-wide cooperation in that sector; points out that this closer cooperation on industrial policy for the automotive sector can take place either at Union level or on a voluntary basis among a number of countries;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to: - carry out
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to carry out properly coordinated structural reforms geared to enhancing competiveness (l
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Europe’s automotive industry is currently in the throes of a crisis of unprecedented proportions requiring swift, coordinated action within the EU
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to carry out
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to carry out properly coordinated structural reforms geared to enhancing competiveness
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to carry out properly coordinated structural reforms geared to
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States to carry out properly coordinated structural reforms geared to enhancing competiveness
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes it essential, with a view to restoring faith in the EU, for the Union to
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers it essential for a cohesive and
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers it essential for an environmentally and climatically sustainable cohesive and dynamic research, production and value chain to be maintained and further developed in the EU;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers it essential for a cohesive and dynamic research, manufacturing production and value chain to be maintained and further developed in the EU;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that unilateral strategies to reduce labour costs have been misdirected. Labour costs in the automotive industry account for between just 13 and 20 percent of added value. Global competitiveness can only be guaranteed by means of innovation throughout the whole production chain and flexibility in the production processes, and this must accordingly be negotiated with the workers;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of maintaining and strengthening the production base in Europe so as to ensure decent living standards for its citizens and consolidate its industries with a view to achieving economic growth and recovery;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for measures for the automotive industry as a whole, Europe wide, to secure employment and training provision;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses that there are huge potentials to further improve eco-efficiency supported by information and communication technologies;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges the fact that the EU’s automotive industry and market are in decline; considers it regrettable, however, that the Commission fails to mention fundamental causes of this decline such as the widely varying circumstances in the industry (firms, market segments and types, products, sectors) and the large number of structural changes (of a demographic, sociological, behavioural, economic and technical nature) that are taking place on the demand side; believes,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges the fact that the European market is in a state of decline and crisis, including in the automotive sector; Acknowledges the fact that the EU’s automotive industry and market are in decline; considers it regrettable, however, that the Commission fails to
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Asks the Commission to make an in- depth country-comparative study of taxation applied to the automobile sector in the EU, in order to simplify and rationalise the current tax burden on production and on trade in motor vehicle- related services and reduce red tape.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – point b b. an action plan setting out all of the policy tools, including in particular research and innovation, available in this area;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – point b a (new) ba. proposals for more active and coordinated support for workers and companies in the automotive sector to promote the reorientation of skills and jobs towards other sectors that are growing;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – point b a (new) ba. Calls for all corporate relocation plans to be suspended and to be subject to the assent of the works councils, employees’ representatives, trade unions and local authorities affected by them;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – point b b (new) bb. Insists that company and group-level management bodies should take account of any development project produced by works councils, employees’ representatives or trade unions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – point b a (new) ba. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop conversion plans in a coordinated fashion so as to support regions facing swingeing job losses in the automotive sector, and calls for integrated use to be made, in the process, of all European-level instruments (EIB, ESF and ERDF) and national instruments so as to assist the workers affected and redirect them towards alternative employment in related sectors, e.g. alternative energy, and for the available automotive technology to be optimised;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – point b b (new) bb. Underscores also the central role and responsibility of firms and regional governments in conversion policy, in particular by improving worker training, but also by making available vacated sites for the socio-economic development and conversion of the regions concerned;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that vehicle manufacturers must become more actively involved in innovation so as to take advantage of new social and behavioural patterns, particularly car-sharing;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen the specific measures for SMEs and mid-cap companies,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to st
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses that suppliers in particular need to be strengthened. It is here that innovation potential (Car2car, car2infrastructure) and employment opportunities can be found;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Is convinced that global demand for sustainable integrated mobility options (such as car sharing, combining car and local public transport, mobility card for cars, scooter bikes, car hire stations, etc.) is set to rise in expanding urban areas in particular;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that new rights and powers of intervention and decision-making in corporate and group management structures are essential so as to change the way that companies and groups are run and the aims they pursue. Employees’ new rights and powers must extend to all key decisions about aspects of management, level and quality of employment, manufacturing and investment choices, strategic takeovers, mergers, re-locations and closures, and relations with suppliers and sub- contractors. This will be achieved in particular by broadening the remit of works councils, Community-wide works councils and group works councils at EU level;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the Commission’s statement on shaping skills and developing competences as the basis for a durable competitive advantage;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes the labour market to be out of step with the industry's requirements (strong demand for highly qualified engineers and technicians) at present; considers it essential in this connection to optimise
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas automotive transport affects the environment, health and quality of life, and needs to be integrated into a system of sustainable mobility;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes the labour market to be out of step with the industry's requirements (strong demand for
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Feels that economically justified restructuring processes and the necessary liquidation of costly excesses in production capacity require constructive social dialogue and, in serious cases, appropriate support from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund; in cases where firms transfer production for political reasons from one country to another, as happened with Fiat, the national government of the country from which production is being withdrawn should exert pressure on the automotive firms, for instance by removing tax relief, while the Commission should prevent those firms from drawing on EU funds or should take back funds already granted;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Member States to make the legislative adjustments required for more open and constructive labour relations (flexible working
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Member States to make the legislative adjustments required for more open and constructive labour relations (
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make sure that any changes and decisions in automotive sector should be taken as closely as possible to the EU citizens. A departure from this presumption should not be taken for granted but be justified with sufficient detail and clarity so that an EU citizen can understand reasons leading to the conclusion that the EU actions are necessary.
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Recommends that Member States should facilitate the registration of auto vehicles in order to avoid difficulties of car ownership
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Believes technological innovation to be the essential factor in automotive-sector competitiveness; reaffirms its determination to ensure that the Europe 2020 targets are met and that economic and sustainable means of transport and new production methods are developed; considers that innovations to develop sustainable production methods and means of transport, such as electric cars, are also an important factor in efforts to achieve the EU’s climate targets;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Believes technological innovation to be the essential factor in automotive-sector competitiveness; calls to ensure the technological neutrality; reaffirms its determination to ensure that the Europe 2020 targets are met and that economic and sustainable means of transport and new production methods are developed;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Takes the view that knowledge and innovation may form the basis for a durable competitive advantage for the European automotive industry when the pace at which innovative solutions are introduced precludes the possibility of their being imitated, and when the means used to protect innovation and to combat industrial espionage will ensure that it is possible to realise a return on investment without harming consumers; believes that the areas in which an innovative advantage will be realised on the European market centre upon environmental and safety considerations;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the automotive industry is feeling the effects of a
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Emphasises that basic research is needed in relation to the development of technologies for mobile energy storage as well as on new options for generating biofuels;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Asserts that there are two effective strategies for competitiveness in the European automotive industry: a cost leadership strategy and a differentiation strategy; feels that applying a combination of the two strategies would create difficulties and be less effective, as it would require a broader front on innovative research;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Notes that the European automotive industry has achieved numerous successes through the strategy of cost leadership, thanks to popular, low-cost models that circulate on the European market (e.g. producers such as Škoda, Dacia and Nissan);
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals regarding technological improvements, but points out that its projections for the creation of added value, commercial opportunities and jobs are subject to various conditions; highlights the finding in numerous studies that innovation in energy efficiency and the reduction of carbon emissions has a positive impact on job creation in the chemicals, electronics and power industries;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls for specific forms of state and EU aid to be created encouraging European vehicle manufacturers to cooperate in producing new, safer, non- polluting, highly fuel efficient vehicles and less expensive, more efficient electric vehicles that will constitute a proper response to mobility needs, particularly for less-well-off and younger people. One of the areas thus funded, within a framework of cooperation and public involvement, would be research into vehicles for the post-oil era. The cooperative arrangements established would include governments and energy companies so that the network infrastructure needed for the new vehicles could be put in place;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers it essential to foster R&D into low-carbon technologies, in which Europe has a lead, and the roll-out of the necessary distribution networks,
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers it essential to foster R&D into low-carbon technologies, in which Europe has a lead, and the roll-out of the necessary distribution networks, but takes the view that these technologies should be brought to market gradually and in the right way, so as to: - gear them as closely as possible to expectations on EU and international markets and ensure they will be accepted by car buyers, and - take into account all the environmental and social externalities linked to a vehicle’s life-cycle, to how it is manufactured and to the clean-up effort it necessitates;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers it essential to foster R&D into low-carbon and more renewable technologies, in which Europe has a lead, and the roll-out of the necessary distribution networks, but takes the view that these technologies should be brought to market gradually and in the right way, so as to gear them as closely as possible to expectations on EU and international markets and ensure they will
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Takes the view that efforts under Horizon 2020 in the area of intelligent cars and intelligent traffic systems must be stepped up; is furthermore convinced that research and pilot projects on digitally linking cars with their environment, and on integrating private and public transport, must be stepped up; points out in addition that traffic system digitisation can make a major contribution towards road safety;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes that the differentiation strategy relies on providing customers with unique added value which is not offered by competitors, such as different product parameters, ease of use, etc.; believes that such a strategy would entail, among other things, the introduction of smart road vehicles;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the automotive industry is feeling the effects of a three-pronged revolution in progress around the world, with demand
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b b. the development of eco-innovations (
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b b. the development of eco-innovations (lighter vehicles, electric cars, driver aids, comfort, renewable fuels) setting European products apart from the others;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b b. the development of eco-innovations (lighter vehicles, driver aids, comfort
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b a (new) ba. Agrees with the Commission that the objective of reducing the weight of delivery vehicles should be a reduction in CO2 emissions to 95g/km and to 147g/km for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles respectively; materials used to construct such vehicles should guarantee cost leadership, for instance by reducing the weight of the vehicles;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b a (new) ba. infrastructure roll-out for electric cars;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b b (new) bb. Recalls that an improvement in vehicle safety should, on the one hand, be guaranteed by energy-absorbing construction components – including modern bumpers –and, on the other hand, by innovative computing solutions that help ensure the functioning of driver-support systems during driving; believes that the e-call system should play a key role and that all information relating to the system in the vehicle, including those supporting the e-call system’s functions, should be made freely available to independent operators on the basis of an inter-operational, standardised and universally available platform which enables the provision of services in this area in the future;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point c a (new) ca. Feels that propulsion, and specifically electric propulsion, should be a key area of innovation, both in order to help the European automotive industry to stand out from the crowd and as a means of building a competitive advantage on the European market; notes that global markets are not as sensitive as the European market to costly environmentally friendly solutions;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point c b (new) cb. Calls attention to the potential of LPG as a fuel whose use is rapidly growing on account of its low price and its significantly lower levels of CO2 emissions; feels that this fuel is undervalued by automotive firms to the extent that they are not prepared to develop competitive designs for this fuel;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d d. strengthening Europe’s leadership in international standard setting and environmentally friendly vehicles, thus ensuring that we can maintain a technological lead on world markets;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d a (new) da. Feels that mechanisms, such as the procedure for measuring CO2 emissions, should become an important aspect of competitiveness for the global automotive industry on the European market; this will ensure that European manufacturers are protected from unfair competition;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the automotive industry is feeling the effects of a three-pronged revolution in progress around the world, with demand shifting to the emerging economies while factories’ productivity has risen, production also moving to those countries, and the energy sources used changing gradually but noticeably;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d a (new) da. integrating key enabling technologies into the automotive sector value chain (new, light materials, biotech for synthetics, and photonics);
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d a (new) da. cooperation at EU and international level in energy storage (e.g. batteries) and energy recovery systems (e.g. better regenerative brakes);
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d a (new) da. the integration of IT services in cars;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d b (new) db. the development of integrated mobility solutions, for urban areas in particular;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to foster the emergence of transnational clusters
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that R&D requires substantial funding (scientific risk, long investment cycles) deplores, in this connection, the fact that the target of channelling 3% of GDP into R&D in the Union has yet to be met;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that R&D requires substantial funding (scientific risk, long investment cycles) deplores, in this connection, the fact that the target of channelling 3% of GDP into R&D in the Union has yet to be met;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls for a European Cooperation Fund to be set up to promote cost sharing in certain areas such as research and training that would facilitate a new type of cooperative joint development arrangement with Russia, the emerging countries, the Mediterranean countries and Africa, enabling these countries to make up lost ground and helping them fund joint development projects to meet their own needs, thereby creating jobs within these countries and in the European Union;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses the need to continue to pursue an ambitious approach to the funding of the green car initiative and SME development, which are clear priorities as part of the Horizon 2020 and COSME programmes; considers that the development of the research agenda as part of these public investment initiatives must be done in consultation with all stakeholders, including civil society, and reflect public objectives in this domain (energy efficiency, environment, health, safety);
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
source: PE-519.523
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-514598_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.268New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-513268_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.661&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-510661_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.643&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-514643_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.607&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-510607_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.523New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-519523_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.598&secondRef=04
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131209&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-12-09-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0391&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0391_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0547New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0547_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/11711New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0636:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0636:EN
|
procedure/subject/13 |
Old
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocationsNew
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) |
procedure/subject/11 |
Old
3.70.03 Climate change, ozoneNew
3.70.03 Climate change, ozone layer |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|