BETA


2018/0088(COD) Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI AYUSO Pilar (icon: PPE PPE) POC Pavel (icon: S&D S&D), GERICKE Arne (icon: ECR ECR), FEDERLEY Fredrick (icon: ALDE ALDE), HÄUSLING Martin (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), PEDICINI Piernicola (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion PECH SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion AGRI KADENBACH Karin (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI SVOBODA Pavel (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Legal Basis Opinion JURI VOSS Axel (icon: PPE PPE) Enrico GASBARRA (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 043-p2, TFEU 114, TFEU 168-p4

Events

2019/09/06
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to improve the transparency of scientific studies supporting marketing authorisation applications in the field of food safety.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC.

CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on General Food Law (GFL Regulation) and eight additional sectoral legislative acts relating to the food chain. Its objective is to make the scientific information on which risk assessment in the food chain and food safety communication are based more transparent and accessible to citizens.

The Regulation originates from the European Citizens' Initiative on Banning Glyphosate and Protecting People and the Environment from Toxic Pesticides, which confirmed concerns about transparency with regard to studies commissioned by industry and submitted as part of authorisation procedures.

Improved risk communication

The Regulation shall ensure transparent, continuous and inclusive risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers.

Risk communication shall aim to:

- raise awareness and understanding of the specific issues under consideration, including in cases of divergences in scientific assessment, during the entire risk analysis process;

- ensure consistency, transparency and clarity in formulating risk management recommendations and decisions;

- provide a sound basis, including, where appropriate, a scientific basis, for understanding risk management decisions;

- improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the risk analysis;

- foster public understanding of the risk analysis, including of the respective tasks and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk managers to enhance confidence in its outcome;

- ensure appropriate involvement of consumers, feed and food businesses, the academic community and all other interested parties;

- ensure appropriate and transparent exchange of information with interested parties in relation to risks associated with the food chain;

-ensure the provision of information to consumers about risk prevention strategies; and

- contribute to the fight against the dissemination of false information and the sources thereof.

The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, a general plan for risk communication in order to achieve the objectives.

Verification studies

The amending Regulation introduces the possibility for the Commission to request the European Food Safety Authority EFSA to commission scientific studies, in exceptional circumstances, to verify the evidence used in its risk assessment process. It also gives a more active role to Member States to help EFSA to encourage more and better scientists to participate in scientific panels.

Protection of confidentiality

Supporting data and information related to an application for authorisation shall be made public by EFSA after an assessment of the validity of the application, unless the applicant demonstrates that such publication could potentially harm his interests and requests confidential treatment by EFSA. The applicant may submit a confirmatory application if he/she disputes EFSA's assessment of confidentiality. In this case, the information shall not be made public until a final decision has been made.

Enhanced governance of the EFSA

The Regulation reinforces the role of the Member States and the efforts and commitment of all parties involved in the EFSA Management Board. In addition to the members and alternates, the Management Board shall comprise: (a) two members and two alternates appointed by the Commission, with the right to vote; (b) two members appointed by the European Parliament, with the right to vote; (c) four members and four alternates with voting rights, representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector.

The selection of members of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the Authority by the EFSA Executive Director and their appointment by the Management Board shall be based on strict criteria ensuring the excellence and independence of the experts while ensuring the multidisciplinary expertise required for each Scientific Panel.

Pre-submission advice

The amending Regulation provides for the implementation of a new pre-submission advisory procedure that shall allow EFSA to advise applicants on how to correctly submit their application for authorisation, thus making the process more reliable.

Database and notification of studies

EFSA shall establish and manage a database of studies commissioned or carried out by business operators to support an application or notification in relation to which Union law contains provisions for the Authority to provide a scientific output, including a scientific opinion.

Fact-finding missions

Commission experts shall carry out fact-finding missions to Member States to assess the application by laboratories and other test facilities of the standards applicable to the performance of tests and studies submitted to the Authority in the context of a request.

Those fact-finding missions shall allow the Commission to identify, and to aim to correct, possible weaknesses in the systems and non-compliance and to provide an additional level of guarantees to reassure the general public on the quality of studies. Based on the conclusions of such fact-finding missions, the Commission may propose appropriate legislative measures aimed at improving compliance with the relevant standards.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26.9.2019.

APPLICATION: from 27.3.2021.

2019/08/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/06/20
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2019/06/20
   CSL - Final act signed
2019/06/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/06/13
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2019/06/13
   CSL - Council Meeting
2019/04/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 603 votes to 17, with 27 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain, amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EC) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC.

The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:

Risk communication

The proposed amending Regulation shall ensure transparent, continuous and inclusive risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers.

Risk communication shall aim to:

raise awareness and understanding of the specific issues under consideration, including in cases of divergences in scientific assessment, during the entire risk analysis process; ensure consistency, transparency and clarity in formulating risk management recommendations and decisions; provide a sound basis, including, where appropriate, a scientific basis, for understanding risk management decisions; improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the risk analysis; foster public understanding of the risk analysis, including of the respective tasks and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk managers to enhance confidence in its outcome; ensure appropriate involvement of consumers, feed and food businesses, the academic community and all other interested parties; ensure appropriate and transparent exchange of information with interested parties in relation to risks associated with the food chain; ensure the provision of information to consumers about risk prevention strategies; and contribute to the fight against the dissemination of false information and the sources thereof.

Taking into account the respective roles of risk assessors and risk managers, risk communication shall:

ensure that accurate and all appropriate information is exchanged in an interactive and timely manner with all interested parties, based on the principles of transparency, openness, and responsiveness; provide transparent information at each stage of the risk analysis process from the framing of requests for scientific advice to the provision of risk assessment and the adoption of risk management decisions, including information on how risk management decisions were reached and which factors were considered; take into account risk perceptions of all interested parties; facilitate understanding and dialogue amongst all interested parties; and be clear and accessible, including to those not directly involved in the process or not having a scientific background.

The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, a general plan for risk communication in order to achieve the objectives, in accordance with the general principles. The general plan shall establish appropriate mechanisms of coordination and cooperation between the risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level involved in the risk analysis process, in particular where several Union agencies provide scientific outputs on the same or on related subject matters, to ensure coherent risk communication and an open dialogue amongst all interested parties.

Governance

Each Member State shall nominate a member and an alternate member as its representatives to the Management Board. The members and alternate members thus nominated shall be appointed by the Council and have the right to vote.

The Management Board would also include two full members appointed by the European Parliament with voting rights.

The selection of members of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the Authority by the EFSA Executive Director and their appointment by the Management Board shall be based on strict criteria ensuring the excellence and independence of the experts while ensuring the multidisciplinary expertise required for each Scientific Panel.

Experts appointed as members of the Scientific Panels shall be scientists who are also actively engaged in research and publish the results in peer-reviewed scientific journals, provided that they comply with the strict criteria of excellence and independence.

Pre-submission advice

The amended legislation also provides for the implementation of a new pre-submission advisory procedure that will allow EFSA to advise applicants on how to properly submit their application for authorisation, thus making the process more reliable.

Notification of studies

The Authority shall establish and manage a database of studies commissioned or carried out by business operators to support an application or notification in relation to which Union law contains provisions for the Authority to provide a scientific output, including a scientific opinion.

Business operators shall, without delay, notify the Authority of the title and the scope of any study commissioned or carried out by them to support an application or a notification, as well as the laboratory or testing facility carrying out that study, and its starting and planned completion dates.

The Authority shall conduct its activities in the most transparent manner and make public a certain amount of information, including agendas, lists of participants and minutes of meetings of the Management Board, Advisory Forum, Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels and their working groups.

The disclosure of such information shall be without prejudice to any existing rules concerning intellectual property rights which set out limitations on certain uses of the disclosed documents or their content.

Documents
2019/04/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/02/19
   EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
2019/02/15
   CSL - Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
2019/02/15
   EP - Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2018/12/17
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/12/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/12/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 172, with 67 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending and amending eight sectoral legislative acts in terms of transparency and confidentiality.

The matter was referred back to the committee for interinstitutional negotiations.

As a reminder, the proposal for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation") aims to (i) strengthen the transparency rules applicable to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), (ii) increase the reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies on which EFSA relies for risk assessment and (iii) improve EFSA's governance and (iv) strengthen risk communication.

The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following issues:

Risk communication : Members believe that risk management, risk assessment and communication actions shall be based in particular on the thorough application of the precautionary principle. To regain public confidence, they called for a transparent, independent, continuous and inclusive process of risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers.

Parliament indicated that risk communication shall:

provide information on how the risk management option chosen reflects the degree of uncertainty of the risk assessment, and the level of consumer and animal health and environmental protection it would achieve; foster public understanding of the risk analysis process, in particular by providing clear and consistent information on the respective tasks, powers and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk assessors; promote the balanced involvement of all interested parties , including economic operators in the food chain as well as consumers and civil society organisations; inform consumers about risk prevention strategies; combat the dissemination of false information and sources thereof.

In order to ensure transparent risk management, the Commission and the Member States shall be required to make public the draft risk management measures envisaged and the agenda and detailed minutes of the meetings of the Member States' working groups at which the risk management measures are discussed.

Risk assessment : Parliament proposed that the European Chemicals Assessment process shall be carried out as part of a coordinated approach for all sectors concerned. In addition, evaluators shall integrate the assessment of ‘cocktail effects’ into their work.

Studies, including test data, submitted by business operators in support of applications for authorisation shall be based on accessible scientific literature or comply with internationally recognised principles and good laboratory practice (GLP) principles. Data from a test commissioned but not registered shall not be used in a risk assessment.

A Union register of studies commissioned by business operators seeking to obtain an authorisation or renewal under Union food law is hereby established. In order to provide an additional level of guarantee ensuring that the Authority can have access to all relevant scientific data and studies available on a subject matter of an authorisation procedure, it is appropriate to provide for a consultation of third parties in order to identify whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available.

To increase the effectiveness of the consultation, the consultation should take place immediately after the studies submitted by industry included in an application for authorisation have been made public, under the transparency rules of this Regulation.

Confidentiality : the amended text introduces a set of criteria for deciding what information may be considered confidential, such as the brand under which the substance will be marketed, and the trade name of the preparations, materials or articles in which it will be used, if any.

Except for information that is considered toxicologically, ecotoxicologically or environmentally relevant , the applicant may request certain information submitted under this Regulation to be kept confidential, accompanied by adequate and verifiable justification. The justification shall include verifiable evidence to show that the disclosure of the information might undermine his commercial interests, or the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual.

Organisation : the Management Board shall be selected in such a way as to secure the highest standards of competence and commitment to the protection of health and the environment and a broad range of relevant experience available amongst the representatives of the Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission.

It shall include (i) two full and alternate members appointed by the Commission, (ii) two representatives appointed by the European Parliament , and (iii) six full members representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector, including one representative of public non-governmental organisations specialised in health, farmers' organisations and agrochemical organisations. The maximum term of office for members would be 2.5 years .

Members of the Scientific Panels shall be appointed by the Management Board for a renewable 5-year term . The Executive Director, after consulting the Management Board, shall publish a call for expressions of interest in the Official Journal of the European Union, in the relevant scientific publications concerned and on the EFSA website, and inform the Member States accordingly. This call would set out the specific multidisciplinary expertise needed within each scientific group and indicate the number of experts required.

As 20% of the current national experts are British, the system shall be strengthened, while encouraging applicants to apply, in order to ensure that a sufficient pool of independent experts is available. In order to ensure the effectiveness of risk assessment, EFSA's staffing and financial resources shall be strengthened.

Lastly, using the model of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), a Board of Appeal of EFSA shall be established by means of delegated acts.

Documents
2018/12/11
   EP - Matter referred back to the committee responsible
2018/12/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/12/06
   EP - Specific opinion
Documents
2018/12/05
   EP - VOSS Axel (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2018/11/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Renate SOMMER (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending and amending eight sectoral legislative acts in terms of transparency and confidentiality.

As a reminder, the proposal for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation") aims to (i) strengthen the transparency rules applicable to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), (ii) increase the reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies on which EFSA relies for risk assessment and (iii) improve EFSA's governance and (iv) strengthen risk communication.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.

Risk communication : Members believe that risk management, risk assessment and communication actions shall be based in particular on the thorough application of the precautionary principle. To regain public confidence, they called for a transparent, independent, continuous and inclusive process of risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers.

Members have indicated that risk communication shall:

foster public understanding of the risk analysis process, in particular by providing clear and consistent information on the respective tasks, powers and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk assessors; promote the balanced involvement of all interested parties , including economic operators in the food chain as well as consumers and civil society organisations; inform consumers about risk prevention strategies; combat the dissemination of false information and sources thereof.

In order to ensure transparent risk management , the Commission and the Member States shall be required to make public the draft risk management measures envisaged and the agenda and detailed minutes of the meetings of the Member States' working groups at which the risk management measures are discussed.

Risk assessment : Members proposed that the European Chemicals Assessment process shall be carried out as part of a coordinated approach for all sectors concerned. In addition, evaluators shall integrate the assessment of ‘cocktail effects’ into their work.

Studies, including test data, submitted by business operators in support of applications for authorisation shall be based on accessible scientific literature or comply with internationally recognised principles and good laboratory practice (GLP) principles. Data from a test commissioned but not registered shall not be used in a risk assessment.

To increase the effectiveness of the consultation, the consultation shall take place immediately after the studies submitted by industry included in an application for authorisation have been made public, under the transparency rules of this Regulation.

Organisation : the Board of Directors should be composed of members who ensure an optimal level of competence and commitment to the protection of health and the environment. It should include (i) two full and alternate members appointed by the Commission, (ii) two representatives appointed by the European Parliament , and (iii) six full members representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector, including one representative of public non-governmental organisations specialised in health, farmers' organisations and agrochemical organisations. The maximum term of office for members would be 2.5 years.

Members of the Scientific Panels shall be appointed by the Management Board for a renewable 5-year term . The Executive Director, after consulting the Management Board, shall publish a call for expressions of interest in the Official Journal of the European Union, in the relevant scientific publications concerned and on the EFSA website, and inform the Member States accordingly. This call would set out the specific multidisciplinary expertise needed within each scientific group and indicate the number of experts required.

As 20% of the current national experts are British, the system shall be strengthened, while encouraging applicants to apply, in order to ensure that a sufficient pool of independent experts is available. In order to ensure the effectiveness of risk assessment, EFSA's staffing and financial resources shall be strengthened.

Lastly, using the model of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), a Board of Appeal of EFSA shall be established by means of delegated acts.

Documents
2018/11/27
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2018/11/18
   FR_ASSEMBLY - Contribution
Documents
2018/10/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/10/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/10/10
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2018/09/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/09/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/09/19
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2018/08/01
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2018/07/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/05/31
   EP - SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2018/05/29
   EP - KADENBACH Karin (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2018/05/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2018/05/03
   EP - AYUSO Pilar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/04/23
   EP - SVOBODA Pavel (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2018/04/12
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2018/04/11
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to improve the transparency of scientific studies in the field of food safety.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation) established the principle of risk analysis as a general principle in EU food law. Risk assessment at EU level is carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), independently of the risk management function, which is entrusted to the EU institutions, and more particularly to the Commission.

The GFL Fitness Check and recent public debates have shown that certain aspects of the current legislative framework need to be addressed .

Citizens demand that the risk assessment process in the area of food law (and the decision-making based on it) be more transparent. Transparency and confidentiality rules currently vary depending on the sub-area of regulation concerned. Many stakeholders and citizens complain that the EFSA’s evaluations of authorisation applications are essentially based on studies, data and information generated (and paid for) by the applicant for authorisation. Risk communication was also found not to be effective enough.

As announced in the Communication replying to the European Citizens’ Initiative “Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides” , this proposal is a targeted revision of the GFL Regulation (and other measures adopted in that framework) in order to improve transparency in risk assessment, reliability, objectivity and independence of studies used by EFSA in its risk assessment, risk communication, and governance of EFSA.

CONTENT: the proposal seeks to amend not only the GFL Regulation but also eight additional sectoral legislative acts relating to the food chain. The main objectives of the proposed amendments are:

ensure greater transparency by ensuring that scientists and citizens have access to key safety related information being assessed by EFSA at an early stage in the risk assessment. All supporting data and information relating to applications for authorisation are to be made public by EFSA upon receipt, including additional information, with the exception of information for which confidentiality is duly justified; improve citizens’ confidence in the credibility of scientific studies by:

i. establishing a Union register of commissioned studies on substances subject to a food law authorisation system, to be managed by EFSA; the register of commissioned studies will have a positive impact on the objectivity of the evidence submitted by industry since it will provide additional guarantee that applicants submit all studies they have performed on a substance whatever their results;

ii. providing a pre-submission procedure, by which EFSA may provide advice to an applicant, such advice being made public;

iii. providing that at the stage of submission of authorisation application, when all studies are made public according to the new provisions on transparency, a consultation of third parties will be launched with the aim to identify whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available;

iv. providing for controls and audits by Commission inspectors in relation to studies;

v. introducing the possibility for the Commission to request EFSA to commission studies in exceptional circumstances (e.g. controversies) for the purpose of verification.

better involving Members States in EFSA’s governance structure and scientific panels without touching on its independence : the proposal aligns the composition of EFSA’s Management Board with the Common Approach on decentralised agencies by including representatives of all Member States . It will also increase the involvement of Member States in the nomination process of Panels’ members. The existing strict criteria on independence are maintained and specific provisions require Member States to set up specific measures ensuring that the experts have concrete means to act independently as required by the proposal. strengthen risk communication : the proposal ensures a develop a comprehensive and effective risk communication strategy, involving the Commission, Member States and the EFSA throughout the risk analysis process, combined with open dialogue amongst all interested parties.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the Commission considers that by strengthening the EFSA’s governance and making risk assessment more sustainable, EFSA will continue to play a fundamental role in the Union food safety system and to contribute to the health and well-being of Union citizens and to an innovative and competitive Union agri-food industry.

To address these issues, the Commission has come up with a wide ranging and ambitious proposal requiring a significant increase in the resources available to the EFSA to enable it to discharge its existing and proposed new responsibilities. Member States that provide the EFSA with expertise also need to receive more compensation.

The impact on EFSA's expenditure is estimated at EUR 256.270 million for the period 2020-2024 (staff costs: EUR 56.276 million; operational expenditure: EUR 199.994 million).

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 132-138, 142, 145-157 11/12/2018 12:26:12.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 339, +: 315, 0: 11
PL BG CZ GB LT SK HU LV FI HR LU AT SI RO DK BE PT MT IE ?? SE CY EE NL DE ES EL FR IT
Total
45
17
19
61
10
10
18
5
11
9
6
18
8
29
13
19
18
6
8
1
16
6
5
21
89
46
17
69
63
icon: PPE PPE
201

United Kingdom PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Bulgaria ALDE

4

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium ALDE

4

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany ALDE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
169

Czechia S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 159 11/12/2018 12:26:48.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 376, -: 275, 0: 14
FR IT ES NL GB EL DE SE FI DK BE CZ PT EE LT AT CY HR ?? LU IE MT BG LV RO SI SK HU PL
Total
69
63
46
21
61
18
89
15
11
13
19
19
17
5
10
18
6
9
1
6
8
6
17
5
29
8
10
19
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

4

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Netherlands PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 161 11/12/2018 12:27:01.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 330, -: 322, 0: 9
FR IT EL AT DE ES PT SE CY ?? MT FI HR DK EE BE IE LU LV LT SK SI CZ HU RO BG GB NL PL
Total
69
61
18
18
89
46
18
16
6
1
6
11
9
13
5
19
8
6
5
10
10
8
19
19
29
16
60
21
43
icon: S&D S&D
169

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Croatia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 160 11/12/2018 12:27:17.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 345, +: 309, 0: 5
IT FR EL AT PT ES DE CY SE ?? MT DK EE IE LU LV FI BE HR LT SK SI HU RO GB CZ BG NL PL
Total
62
69
18
18
18
46
87
6
13
1
6
13
5
8
6
5
11
19
9
10
10
8
19
28
61
19
16
21
45
icon: S&D S&D
165

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

4

Croatia PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 163 11/12/2018 12:27:40.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 365, -: 279, 0: 19
FR IT ES EL DE AT GB NL SE DK PT EE BE LT CZ FI CY HR RO ?? LU LV IE SI MT BG SK HU PL
Total
69
63
46
18
89
18
61
21
16
12
18
5
17
10
19
10
6
9
29
1
6
5
8
8
6
17
10
19
45
icon: S&D S&D
168

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

United Kingdom PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2
5

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 141 11/12/2018 12:27:55.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 358, +: 298, 0: 5
PL BG CZ HU SK LV FI HR LU SI LT AT RO DK MT IE EE ?? BE CY SE PT DE EL NL ES GB IT FR
Total
44
17
19
19
10
5
11
9
6
8
10
17
29
13
6
8
5
1
19
6
16
18
88
18
21
46
60
62
68
icon: PPE PPE
200

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ALDE

4

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1
3

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 164 11/12/2018 12:28:09.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 331, +: 308, 0: 24
FR IT EL DE SE PT CY ES ?? MT EE HR DK IE LU AT LV LT SK SI FI HU BE RO CZ GB NL BG PL
Total
69
63
17
87
16
18
6
45
1
6
5
9
13
8
6
18
5
10
10
8
11
19
19
29
19
61
21
17
45
icon: S&D S&D
169

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
199

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 166 11/12/2018 12:28:22.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 324, +: 314, 0: 27
FR IT EL AT SE PT CY ES DE ?? MT EE DK FI IE LU BE RO HR LV LT HU SK SI CZ NL BG GB PL
Total
69
63
18
17
16
18
6
45
89
1
6
5
13
12
8
6
19
29
9
5
10
18
10
8
19
21
17
61
45
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
200

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Croatia PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 144 11/12/2018 12:28:38.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 381, +: 263, 0: 6
PL HU SK HR BE AT LU MT IE LV BG CY SI ?? RO LT CZ EE PT DK FI SE GB EL NL ES FR DE IT
Total
45
19
10
9
19
18
6
6
8
5
17
5
7
1
28
10
16
5
18
13
11
16
57
18
21
45
67
86
62
icon: PPE PPE
197

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: NI NI
19

Hungary NI

2

NI

Against (1)

1

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
28

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Croatia ALDE

2

Belgium ALDE

4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Czechia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
168
3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 140 11/12/2018 12:29:12.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 332, -: 331, 0: 3
PL BG GB HU CZ BE SI RO SK LV HR LT LU FI AT EE DK MT IE ?? SE CY NL PT ES DE EL FR IT
Total
45
17
61
19
19
19
8
29
10
5
9
10
6
12
18
5
13
6
8
1
16
6
21
18
46
88
18
68
63
icon: PPE PPE
201

United Kingdom PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Romania ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

United Kingdom NI

3

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: S&D S&D
170

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 143 11/12/2018 12:29:29.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 382, +: 271, 0: 9
PL HU GB SK BG RO LV AT LU SI IE LT HR CZ ?? CY EE PT FI SE BE MT DK EL DE NL ES FR IT
Total
45
19
60
10
17
29
5
18
6
8
8
9
9
19
1
6
4
18
12
16
18
6
12
18
89
21
46
69
62
icon: PPE PPE
200

United Kingdom PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Sweden ECR

2

Denmark ECR

For (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

NI

Against (1)

1

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
170
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
3

Netherlands S&D

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 168S 11/12/2018 12:29:43.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 326, +: 324, 0: 17
IT FR DE EL SE PT CY ES GB ?? MT FI SI LU AT LV EE BE NL IE DK HR LT SK BG HU RO CZ PL
Total
62
69
89
17
16
18
6
46
61
1
6
12
8
6
18
5
6
19
21
8
13
9
10
10
17
19
29
19
45
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

5

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Germany ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: PPE PPE
202

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Finland PPE

3
5

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Netherlands PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Am 169S 11/12/2018 12:29:56.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: -: 335, +: 314, 0: 17
IT FR EL DE SE PT CY ES ?? MT GB DK EE IE SI LU AT LV BE NL HR FI LT SK HU RO CZ BG PL
Total
63
69
17
89
16
18
6
46
1
6
61
13
5
8
8
6
18
5
19
21
9
12
10
10
19
29
19
17
44
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Belgium ALDE

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
202

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
5

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Netherlands PPE

3

Croatia PPE

3

A8-0417/2018 - Renate Sommer - Proposition de la Commission 11/12/2018 12:30:23.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 427, -: 172, 0: 67
FR IT ES DE BE SE DK GB EL PT LT NL BG FI CY HR AT EE PL CZ IE SI ?? LU RO SK LV MT HU
Total
69
63
46
89
19
16
12
61
18
18
10
21
17
12
6
9
18
5
45
19
8
8
1
6
28
10
5
6
19
icon: S&D S&D
169

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium ALDE

4

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Cyprus ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

2

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: PPE PPE
202

Belgium PPE

4

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

For (1)

3

Netherlands PPE

3

Finland PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4
5

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

A8-0417/2018 - Pilar Ayuso - Am 171 17/04/2019 12:58:48.000 #

2019/04/17 Outcome: +: 603, 0: 27, -: 17
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO BE HU NL PT CZ SE BG AT FI HR DK EL SK IE LT LV SI LU MT EE CY
Total
92
68
54
48
55
45
28
21
18
25
19
20
18
13
16
11
11
11
13
10
9
8
8
8
6
6
4
1
icon: PPE PPE
185

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
164

Netherlands S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Greece S&D

1
3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Italy ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Romania ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

A8-0417/2018 - Pilar Ayuso - Am 171 #

2019/04/17 Outcome: +: 603, 0: 27, -: 17
DE FR IT ES GB PL RO BE HU NL PT CZ BG SE AT FI HR DK EL SK IE LT LV SI LU MT EE CY
Total
92
68
54
47
55
45
28
21
18
25
19
20
13
17
16
11
11
11
13
10
9
8
8
8
6
6
4
1
icon: PPE PPE
185

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Netherlands S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Greece S&D

1
3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Italy ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Romania ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
29

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

2
AmendmentsDossier
900 2018/0088(COD)
2018/09/05 PECH 68 amendments...
source: 626.984
2018/09/06 AGRI 174 amendments...
source: 627.041
2018/09/07 JURI 182 amendments...
source: 627.669
2018/09/21 ENVI 476 amendments...
source: 627.781

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-623765_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-627781_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-627946_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-625411_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-625400_EN.html
docs/8
date
2018-12-06T00:00:00
docs
title: PE631.927
committee
JURI
type
Specific opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2018-10-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE625.353
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AL-631927_EN.html
docs/9
date
2018-11-27T00:00:00
docs
title: PE628.598
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/10
date
2018-12-06T00:00:00
docs
title: PE631.927
committee
JURI
type
Specific opinion
body
EP
docs/10
date
2019-02-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/envi/inag/2019/02-15/ENVI_AG(2019)636018_EN.docx title: PE636.018
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/13
date
2018-08-01T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/14
date
2018-11-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179
type
Contribution
body
FR_ASSEMBLY
docs/14
date
2018-08-02T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/15
date
2018-11-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179
type
Contribution
body
FR_ASSEMBLY
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-12-10-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/8/date
Old
2019-02-20T00:00:00
New
2019-02-19T00:00:00
events/9/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-04-16-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
links/Research document/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)630315
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)630315
committees/0/shadows/3
name
HAZEKAMP Anja
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.765
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2522)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.781
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.946
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2837)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2837)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.411&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.400&secondRef=02
docs/8/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.353&secondRef=03
docs/10/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0417_EN.html title: A8-0417/2018
summary
events/3
date
2018-11-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0417_EN.html title: A8-0417/2018
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181210&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0489_EN.html title: T8-0489/2018
summary
events/6
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0489_EN.html title: T8-0489/2018
summary
events/9/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190416&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/10
date
2019-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0400_EN.html title: T8-0400/2019
summary
events/10
date
2019-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0400_EN.html title: T8-0400/2019
summary
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/13
date
2019-08-08T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31872&j=0&l=en title: SP(2019)440
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0417&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0417_EN.html
events/5
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0489 title: T8-0489/2018
summary
events/5
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31872&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0489 title: T8-0489/2018
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0489
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0489_EN.html
events/9
date
2019-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0400 title: T8-0400/2019
summary
events/10
date
2019-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0400 title: T8-0400/2019
summary
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0400
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0400_EN.html
events/13
date
2019-09-06T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
docs
events/14
date
2019-09-06T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
docs
events/14/summary
  • PURPOSE: to improve the transparency of scientific studies supporting marketing authorisation applications in the field of food safety.
  • LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC.
  • CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on General Food Law (GFL Regulation) and eight additional sectoral legislative acts relating to the food chain. Its objective is to make the scientific information on which risk assessment in the food chain and food safety communication are based more transparent and accessible to citizens.
  • The Regulation originates from the European Citizens' Initiative on Banning Glyphosate and Protecting People and the Environment from Toxic Pesticides, which confirmed concerns about transparency with regard to studies commissioned by industry and submitted as part of authorisation procedures.
  • Improved risk communication
  • The Regulation shall ensure transparent, continuous and inclusive risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers.
  • Risk communication shall aim to:
  • - raise awareness and understanding of the specific issues under consideration, including in cases of divergences in scientific assessment, during the entire risk analysis process;
  • - ensure consistency, transparency and clarity in formulating risk management recommendations and decisions;
  • - provide a sound basis, including, where appropriate, a scientific basis, for understanding risk management decisions;
  • - improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the risk analysis;
  • - foster public understanding of the risk analysis, including of the respective tasks and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk managers to enhance confidence in its outcome;
  • - ensure appropriate involvement of consumers, feed and food businesses, the academic community and all other interested parties;
  • - ensure appropriate and transparent exchange of information with interested parties in relation to risks associated with the food chain;
  • -ensure the provision of information to consumers about risk prevention strategies; and
  • - contribute to the fight against the dissemination of false information and the sources thereof.
  • The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, a general plan for risk communication in order to achieve the objectives.
  • Verification studies
  • The amending Regulation introduces the possibility for the Commission to request the European Food Safety Authority EFSA to commission scientific studies, in exceptional circumstances, to verify the evidence used in its risk assessment process. It also gives a more active role to Member States to help EFSA to encourage more and better scientists to participate in scientific panels.
  • Protection of confidentiality
  • Supporting data and information related to an application for authorisation shall be made public by EFSA after an assessment of the validity of the application, unless the applicant demonstrates that such publication could potentially harm his interests and requests confidential treatment by EFSA. The applicant may submit a confirmatory application if he/she disputes EFSA's assessment of confidentiality. In this case, the information shall not be made public until a final decision has been made.
  • Enhanced governance of the EFSA
  • The Regulation reinforces the role of the Member States and the efforts and commitment of all parties involved in the EFSA Management Board. In addition to the members and alternates, the Management Board shall comprise: (a) two members and two alternates appointed by the Commission, with the right to vote; (b) two members appointed by the European Parliament, with the right to vote; (c) four members and four alternates with voting rights, representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector.
  • The selection of members of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the Authority by the EFSA Executive Director and their appointment by the Management Board shall be based on strict criteria ensuring the excellence and independence of the experts while ensuring the multidisciplinary expertise required for each Scientific Panel.
  • Pre-submission advice
  • The amending Regulation provides for the implementation of a new pre-submission advisory procedure that shall allow EFSA to advise applicants on how to correctly submit their application for authorisation, thus making the process more reliable.
  • Database and notification of studies
  • EFSA shall establish and manage a database of studies commissioned or carried out by business operators to support an application or notification in relation to which Union law contains provisions for the Authority to provide a scientific output, including a scientific opinion.
  • Fact-finding missions
  • Commission experts shall carry out fact-finding missions to Member States to assess the application by laboratories and other test facilities of the standards applicable to the performance of tests and studies submitted to the Authority in the context of a request.
  • Those fact-finding missions shall allow the Commission to identify, and to aim to correct, possible weaknesses in the systems and non-compliance and to provide an additional level of guarantees to reassure the general public on the quality of studies. Based on the conclusions of such fact-finding missions, the Commission may propose appropriate legislative measures aimed at improving compliance with the relevant standards.
  • ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26.9.2019.
  • APPLICATION: from 27.3.2021.
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
events/13
date
2019-09-06T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
docs
procedure/final
title
Regulation 2019/1381
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32019R1381
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: AYUSO Pilar date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYUSO Pilar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: KADENBACH Karin date: 2018-05-29T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KADENBACH Karin group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: SVOBODA Pavel date: 2018-04-23T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2018-04-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SVOBODA Pavel group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
type
Committee Legal Basis Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: VOSS Axel date: 2018-12-05T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
type
Committee Legal Basis Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2018-12-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VOSS Axel group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927&secondRef=01
activities
  • date: 2018-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0179/COM_COM(2018)0179_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0179 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52018PC0179:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/health-and-food-safety_en title: Health and Food Safety Commissioner: ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2018-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: KADENBACH Karin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: POC Pavel group: ECR name: GERICKE Arne group: ALDE name: FEDERLEY Fredrick group: GUE/NGL name: HAZEKAMP Anja group: Verts/ALE name: HÄUSLING Martin group: EFD name: PEDICINI Piernicola responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2018-04-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
commission
  • body: EC dg: Health and Food Safety commissioner: ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AYUSO Pilar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: KADENBACH Karin
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KADENBACH Karin group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2018-04-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2018-04-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SVOBODA Pavel group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
PECH
date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
committees/7
type
Committee Legal Basis Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2018-12-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VOSS Axel group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting_id: 3698 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3698*&MEET_DATE=13/06/2019 date: 2019-06-13T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3664 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3664*&MEET_DATE=17/12/2018 date: 2018-12-17T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2018-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0097:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2018)0097 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2018-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.765 title: PE623.765 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-19T00:00:00 docs: title: CES2522/2018 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2018-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.781 title: PE627.781 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.946 title: PE627.946 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-10T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2837)(documentyear:2018)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR2837/2018 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 2018-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.411&secondRef=02 title: PE625.411 committee: PECH type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.400&secondRef=02 title: PE625.400 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.353&secondRef=03 title: PE625.353 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-27T00:00:00 docs: title: PE628.598 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.927 title: PE631.927 committee: JURI type: Specific opinion body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/envi/lcag/2019/02-15/ENVI_LA(2019)001497_EN.pdf title: GEDA/A/(2019)001497 type: Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement body: CSL
  • date: 2019-06-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F19&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00041/2019/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2018-08-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2018-11-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0179 title: COM(2018)0179 type: Contribution body: FR_ASSEMBLY
events
  • date: 2018-04-11T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0179/COM_COM(2018)0179_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0179 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0179 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to improve the transparency of scientific studies in the field of food safety. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council. BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation) established the principle of risk analysis as a general principle in EU food law. Risk assessment at EU level is carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), independently of the risk management function, which is entrusted to the EU institutions, and more particularly to the Commission. The GFL Fitness Check and recent public debates have shown that certain aspects of the current legislative framework need to be addressed . Citizens demand that the risk assessment process in the area of food law (and the decision-making based on it) be more transparent. Transparency and confidentiality rules currently vary depending on the sub-area of regulation concerned. Many stakeholders and citizens complain that the EFSA’s evaluations of authorisation applications are essentially based on studies, data and information generated (and paid for) by the applicant for authorisation. Risk communication was also found not to be effective enough. As announced in the Communication replying to the European Citizens’ Initiative “Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides” , this proposal is a targeted revision of the GFL Regulation (and other measures adopted in that framework) in order to improve transparency in risk assessment, reliability, objectivity and independence of studies used by EFSA in its risk assessment, risk communication, and governance of EFSA. CONTENT: the proposal seeks to amend not only the GFL Regulation but also eight additional sectoral legislative acts relating to the food chain. The main objectives of the proposed amendments are: ensure greater transparency by ensuring that scientists and citizens have access to key safety related information being assessed by EFSA at an early stage in the risk assessment. All supporting data and information relating to applications for authorisation are to be made public by EFSA upon receipt, including additional information, with the exception of information for which confidentiality is duly justified; improve citizens’ confidence in the credibility of scientific studies by: i. establishing a Union register of commissioned studies on substances subject to a food law authorisation system, to be managed by EFSA; the register of commissioned studies will have a positive impact on the objectivity of the evidence submitted by industry since it will provide additional guarantee that applicants submit all studies they have performed on a substance whatever their results; ii. providing a pre-submission procedure, by which EFSA may provide advice to an applicant, such advice being made public; iii. providing that at the stage of submission of authorisation application, when all studies are made public according to the new provisions on transparency, a consultation of third parties will be launched with the aim to identify whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available; iv. providing for controls and audits by Commission inspectors in relation to studies; v. introducing the possibility for the Commission to request EFSA to commission studies in exceptional circumstances (e.g. controversies) for the purpose of verification. better involving Members States in EFSA’s governance structure and scientific panels without touching on its independence : the proposal aligns the composition of EFSA’s Management Board with the Common Approach on decentralised agencies by including representatives of all Member States . It will also increase the involvement of Member States in the nomination process of Panels’ members. The existing strict criteria on independence are maintained and specific provisions require Member States to set up specific measures ensuring that the experts have concrete means to act independently as required by the proposal. strengthen risk communication : the proposal ensures a develop a comprehensive and effective risk communication strategy, involving the Commission, Member States and the EFSA throughout the risk analysis process, combined with open dialogue amongst all interested parties. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the Commission considers that by strengthening the EFSA’s governance and making risk assessment more sustainable, EFSA will continue to play a fundamental role in the Union food safety system and to contribute to the health and well-being of Union citizens and to an innovative and competitive Union agri-food industry. To address these issues, the Commission has come up with a wide ranging and ambitious proposal requiring a significant increase in the resources available to the EFSA to enable it to discharge its existing and proposed new responsibilities. Member States that provide the EFSA with expertise also need to receive more compensation. The impact on EFSA's expenditure is estimated at EUR 256.270 million for the period 2020-2024 (staff costs: EUR 56.276 million; operational expenditure: EUR 199.994 million).
  • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0417&language=EN title: A8-0417/2018 summary: The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Renate SOMMER (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending and amending eight sectoral legislative acts in terms of transparency and confidentiality. As a reminder, the proposal for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation") aims to (i) strengthen the transparency rules applicable to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), (ii) increase the reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies on which EFSA relies for risk assessment and (iii) improve EFSA's governance and (iv) strengthen risk communication. The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows. Risk communication : Members believe that risk management, risk assessment and communication actions shall be based in particular on the thorough application of the precautionary principle. To regain public confidence, they called for a transparent, independent, continuous and inclusive process of risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers. Members have indicated that risk communication shall: foster public understanding of the risk analysis process, in particular by providing clear and consistent information on the respective tasks, powers and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk assessors; promote the balanced involvement of all interested parties , including economic operators in the food chain as well as consumers and civil society organisations; inform consumers about risk prevention strategies; combat the dissemination of false information and sources thereof. In order to ensure transparent risk management , the Commission and the Member States shall be required to make public the draft risk management measures envisaged and the agenda and detailed minutes of the meetings of the Member States' working groups at which the risk management measures are discussed. Risk assessment : Members proposed that the European Chemicals Assessment process shall be carried out as part of a coordinated approach for all sectors concerned. In addition, evaluators shall integrate the assessment of ‘cocktail effects’ into their work. Studies, including test data, submitted by business operators in support of applications for authorisation shall be based on accessible scientific literature or comply with internationally recognised principles and good laboratory practice (GLP) principles. Data from a test commissioned but not registered shall not be used in a risk assessment. To increase the effectiveness of the consultation, the consultation shall take place immediately after the studies submitted by industry included in an application for authorisation have been made public, under the transparency rules of this Regulation. Organisation : the Board of Directors should be composed of members who ensure an optimal level of competence and commitment to the protection of health and the environment. It should include (i) two full and alternate members appointed by the Commission, (ii) two representatives appointed by the European Parliament , and (iii) six full members representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector, including one representative of public non-governmental organisations specialised in health, farmers' organisations and agrochemical organisations. The maximum term of office for members would be 2.5 years. Members of the Scientific Panels shall be appointed by the Management Board for a renewable 5-year term . The Executive Director, after consulting the Management Board, shall publish a call for expressions of interest in the Official Journal of the European Union, in the relevant scientific publications concerned and on the EFSA website, and inform the Member States accordingly. This call would set out the specific multidisciplinary expertise needed within each scientific group and indicate the number of experts required. As 20% of the current national experts are British, the system shall be strengthened, while encouraging applicants to apply, in order to ensure that a sufficient pool of independent experts is available. In order to ensure the effectiveness of risk assessment, EFSA's staffing and financial resources shall be strengthened. Lastly, using the model of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), a Board of Appeal of EFSA shall be established by means of delegated acts.
  • date: 2018-12-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181210&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0489 title: T8-0489/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 172, with 67 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending and amending eight sectoral legislative acts in terms of transparency and confidentiality. The matter was referred back to the committee for interinstitutional negotiations. As a reminder, the proposal for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation") aims to (i) strengthen the transparency rules applicable to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), (ii) increase the reliability, objectivity and independence of the studies on which EFSA relies for risk assessment and (iii) improve EFSA's governance and (iv) strengthen risk communication. The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following issues: Risk communication : Members believe that risk management, risk assessment and communication actions shall be based in particular on the thorough application of the precautionary principle. To regain public confidence, they called for a transparent, independent, continuous and inclusive process of risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers. Parliament indicated that risk communication shall: provide information on how the risk management option chosen reflects the degree of uncertainty of the risk assessment, and the level of consumer and animal health and environmental protection it would achieve; foster public understanding of the risk analysis process, in particular by providing clear and consistent information on the respective tasks, powers and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk assessors; promote the balanced involvement of all interested parties , including economic operators in the food chain as well as consumers and civil society organisations; inform consumers about risk prevention strategies; combat the dissemination of false information and sources thereof. In order to ensure transparent risk management, the Commission and the Member States shall be required to make public the draft risk management measures envisaged and the agenda and detailed minutes of the meetings of the Member States' working groups at which the risk management measures are discussed. Risk assessment : Parliament proposed that the European Chemicals Assessment process shall be carried out as part of a coordinated approach for all sectors concerned. In addition, evaluators shall integrate the assessment of ‘cocktail effects’ into their work. Studies, including test data, submitted by business operators in support of applications for authorisation shall be based on accessible scientific literature or comply with internationally recognised principles and good laboratory practice (GLP) principles. Data from a test commissioned but not registered shall not be used in a risk assessment. A Union register of studies commissioned by business operators seeking to obtain an authorisation or renewal under Union food law is hereby established. In order to provide an additional level of guarantee ensuring that the Authority can have access to all relevant scientific data and studies available on a subject matter of an authorisation procedure, it is appropriate to provide for a consultation of third parties in order to identify whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available. To increase the effectiveness of the consultation, the consultation should take place immediately after the studies submitted by industry included in an application for authorisation have been made public, under the transparency rules of this Regulation. Confidentiality : the amended text introduces a set of criteria for deciding what information may be considered confidential, such as the brand under which the substance will be marketed, and the trade name of the preparations, materials or articles in which it will be used, if any. Except for information that is considered toxicologically, ecotoxicologically or environmentally relevant , the applicant may request certain information submitted under this Regulation to be kept confidential, accompanied by adequate and verifiable justification. The justification shall include verifiable evidence to show that the disclosure of the information might undermine his commercial interests, or the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual. Organisation : the Management Board shall be selected in such a way as to secure the highest standards of competence and commitment to the protection of health and the environment and a broad range of relevant experience available amongst the representatives of the Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission. It shall include (i) two full and alternate members appointed by the Commission, (ii) two representatives appointed by the European Parliament , and (iii) six full members representing the interests of civil society and the food chain sector, including one representative of public non-governmental organisations specialised in health, farmers' organisations and agrochemical organisations. The maximum term of office for members would be 2.5 years . Members of the Scientific Panels shall be appointed by the Management Board for a renewable 5-year term . The Executive Director, after consulting the Management Board, shall publish a call for expressions of interest in the Official Journal of the European Union, in the relevant scientific publications concerned and on the EFSA website, and inform the Member States accordingly. This call would set out the specific multidisciplinary expertise needed within each scientific group and indicate the number of experts required. As 20% of the current national experts are British, the system shall be strengthened, while encouraging applicants to apply, in order to ensure that a sufficient pool of independent experts is available. In order to ensure the effectiveness of risk assessment, EFSA's staffing and financial resources shall be strengthened. Lastly, using the model of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), a Board of Appeal of EFSA shall be established by means of delegated acts.
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: Matter referred back to the committee responsible body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-20T00:00:00 type: Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/envi/inag/2019/02-15/ENVI_AG(2019)636018_EN.docx title: PE636.018 url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/envi/lcag/2019/02-15/ENVI_LA(2019)001497_EN.pdf title: GEDA/A/(2019)001497
  • date: 2019-04-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190416&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-04-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0400 title: T8-0400/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 603 votes to 17, with 27 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain, amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EC) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC. The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows: Risk communication The proposed amending Regulation shall ensure transparent, continuous and inclusive risk communication throughout the risk analysis, involving Union and national risk assessors and risk managers. Risk communication shall aim to: raise awareness and understanding of the specific issues under consideration, including in cases of divergences in scientific assessment, during the entire risk analysis process; ensure consistency, transparency and clarity in formulating risk management recommendations and decisions; provide a sound basis, including, where appropriate, a scientific basis, for understanding risk management decisions; improve the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the risk analysis; foster public understanding of the risk analysis, including of the respective tasks and responsibilities of risk assessors and risk managers to enhance confidence in its outcome; ensure appropriate involvement of consumers, feed and food businesses, the academic community and all other interested parties; ensure appropriate and transparent exchange of information with interested parties in relation to risks associated with the food chain; ensure the provision of information to consumers about risk prevention strategies; and contribute to the fight against the dissemination of false information and the sources thereof. Taking into account the respective roles of risk assessors and risk managers, risk communication shall: ensure that accurate and all appropriate information is exchanged in an interactive and timely manner with all interested parties, based on the principles of transparency, openness, and responsiveness; provide transparent information at each stage of the risk analysis process from the framing of requests for scientific advice to the provision of risk assessment and the adoption of risk management decisions, including information on how risk management decisions were reached and which factors were considered; take into account risk perceptions of all interested parties; facilitate understanding and dialogue amongst all interested parties; and be clear and accessible, including to those not directly involved in the process or not having a scientific background. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, a general plan for risk communication in order to achieve the objectives, in accordance with the general principles. The general plan shall establish appropriate mechanisms of coordination and cooperation between the risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level involved in the risk analysis process, in particular where several Union agencies provide scientific outputs on the same or on related subject matters, to ensure coherent risk communication and an open dialogue amongst all interested parties. Governance Each Member State shall nominate a member and an alternate member as its representatives to the Management Board. The members and alternate members thus nominated shall be appointed by the Council and have the right to vote. The Management Board would also include two full members appointed by the European Parliament with voting rights. The selection of members of the Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels of the Authority by the EFSA Executive Director and their appointment by the Management Board shall be based on strict criteria ensuring the excellence and independence of the experts while ensuring the multidisciplinary expertise required for each Scientific Panel. Experts appointed as members of the Scientific Panels shall be scientists who are also actively engaged in research and publish the results in peer-reviewed scientific journals, provided that they comply with the strict criteria of excellence and independence. Pre-submission advice The amended legislation also provides for the implementation of a new pre-submission advisory procedure that will allow EFSA to advise applicants on how to properly submit their application for authorisation, thus making the process more reliable. Notification of studies The Authority shall establish and manage a database of studies commissioned or carried out by business operators to support an application or notification in relation to which Union law contains provisions for the Authority to provide a scientific output, including a scientific opinion. Business operators shall, without delay, notify the Authority of the title and the scope of any study commissioned or carried out by them to support an application or a notification, as well as the laboratory or testing facility carrying out that study, and its starting and planned completion dates. The Authority shall conduct its activities in the most transparent manner and make public a certain amount of information, including agendas, lists of participants and minutes of meetings of the Management Board, Advisory Forum, Scientific Committee and Scientific Panels and their working groups. The disclosure of such information shall be without prejudice to any existing rules concerning intellectual property rights which set out limitations on certain uses of the disclosed documents or their content.
  • date: 2019-06-13T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2019-06-20T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2019-06-20T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links/Research document
title
Briefing
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)630315
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/health-and-food-safety_en title: Health and Food Safety commissioner: ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas
otherinst
  • name: European Economic and Social Committee
  • name: European Committee of the Regions
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/8/12782
New
  • ENVI/8/12782
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amending Directive 2001/18/EC 1998/0072(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 2000/0286(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 2001/0173(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 2002/0073(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 2002/0163(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 2003/0272(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 2006/0136(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 2006/0143(COD) Amending Regulation (EU) No 2015/2283 2013/0435(COD)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59-p4
procedure/other_consulted_institutions
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.10.03 Marketing and trade of agricultural products and livestock
  • 3.10.10 Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
  • 3.40.13 Food industry
  • 4.60 Consumers' protection in general
  • 4.60.04.04 Food safety
  • 8.40.08 Agencies and bodies of the EU
New
3.10.03
Marketing and trade of agricultural products and livestock
3.10.10
Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
3.40.13
Food industry
4.60
Consumers' protection in general
4.60.04.04
Food safety
8.40.08
Agencies and bodies of the EU
procedure/summary
  • Amending Directive 2001/18/EC
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 178/2002
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003
  • Amending Regulation (EU) No 2015/2283
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to improve the transparency of scientific studies in the field of food safety.

    PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 on general food law (the GFL Regulation) established the principle of risk analysis as a general principle in EU food law. Risk assessment at EU level is carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), independently of the risk management function, which is entrusted to the EU institutions, and more particularly to the Commission.

    The GFL Fitness Check and recent public debates have shown that certain aspects of the current legislative framework need to be addressed.

    Citizens demand that the risk assessment process in the area of food law (and the decision-making based on it) be more transparent. Transparency and confidentiality rules currently vary depending on the sub-area of regulation concerned. Many stakeholders and citizens complain that the EFSA’s evaluations of authorisation applications are essentially based on studies, data and information generated (and paid for) by the applicant for authorisation. Risk communication was also found not to be effective enough.

    As announced in the Communication replying to the European Citizens’ Initiative “Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides”, this proposal is a targeted revision of the GFL Regulation (and other measures adopted in that framework) in order to improve transparency in risk assessment, reliability, objectivity and independence of studies used by EFSA in its risk assessment, risk communication, and governance of EFSA.

    CONTENT: the proposal seeks to amend not only the GFL Regulation but also eight additional sectoral legislative acts relating to the food chain. The main objectives of the proposed amendments are:

    • ensure greater transparency by ensuring that scientists and citizens have access to key safety related information being assessed by EFSA at an early stage in the risk assessment. All supporting data and information relating to applications for authorisation are to be made public by EFSA upon receipt, including additional information, with the exception of information for which confidentiality is duly justified;
    • improve citizens’ confidence in the credibility of scientific studies by:

                                    i.            establishing a Union register of commissioned studies on substances subject to a food law authorisation system, to be managed by EFSA; the register of commissioned studies will have a positive impact on the objectivity of the evidence submitted by industry since it will provide additional guarantee that applicants submit all studies they have performed on a substance whatever their results;

                                  ii.            providing a pre-submission procedure, by which EFSA may provide advice to an applicant, such advice being made public;

                                iii.            providing that at the stage of submission of authorisation application, when all studies are made public according to the new provisions on transparency, a consultation of third parties will be launched with the aim to identify whether other relevant scientific data or studies are available;

                                iv.            providing for controls and audits by Commission inspectors in relation to studies;

                                  v.            introducing the possibility for the Commission to request EFSA to commission studies in exceptional circumstances (e.g. controversies) for the purpose of verification.

    • better involving Members States in EFSA’s governance structure and scientific panels without touching on its independence: the proposal aligns the composition of EFSA’s Management Board with the Common Approach on decentralised agencies by including representatives of all Member States. It will also increase the involvement of Member States in the nomination process of Panels’ members. The existing strict criteria on independence are maintained and specific provisions require Member States to set up specific measures ensuring that the experts have concrete means to act independently as required by the proposal.
    • strengthen risk communication: the proposal ensures a develop a comprehensive and effective risk communication strategy, involving the Commission, Member States and the EFSA throughout the risk analysis process, combined with open dialogue amongst all interested parties.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the Commission considers that by strengthening the EFSA’s governance and making risk assessment more sustainable, EFSA will continue to play a fundamental role in the Union food safety system and to contribute to the health and well-being of Union citizens and to an innovative and competitive Union agri-food industry. 

    To address these issues, the Commission has come up with a wide ranging and ambitious proposal requiring a significant increase in the resources available to the EFSA to enable it to discharge its existing and proposed new responsibilities. Member States that provide the EFSA with expertise also need to receive more compensation.

    The impact on EFSA's expenditure is estimated at EUR 256.270 million for the period 2020-2024 (staff costs: EUR 56.276 million; operational expenditure: EUR 199.994 million).

activities/1
date
2018-05-28T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
committees/0/date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: KADENBACH Karin
committees/2/date
2018-05-03T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
committees/2/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GERICKE Arne
committees/2/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
FEDERLEY Fredrick
committees/2/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
HAZEKAMP Anja
committees/2/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
HÄUSLING Martin
committees/2/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
PEDICINI Piernicola
committees/6/date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
committees/6/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/8/12782
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas
committees/5/date
2018-04-23T00:00:00
committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
activities
  • date: 2018-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0179/COM_COM(2018)0179_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52018PC0179:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2018)0179 body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: POC Pavel responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2018/0088(COD)
    instrument
    Regulation
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    subject