Activities of Marco DREOSTO
Plenary speeches (32)
Authorization of GMOs (debate)
Storms in Europe – particularly the heavy rains in Spain and of the hurricane in Azores (Portugal) (debate)
International day to end impunity for crimes against journalists (debate)
Order of business
Situation of freedoms in Algeria
The Rule of Law in Malta, after the recent revelations around the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia (debate)
Distortion of European history and remembrance of the Second World War (topical debate)
EU response to devastation following floods in Spain (debate)
The illegal trade in companion animals in the EU (debate)
Foreign policy consequences of the COVID-19 crisis - The PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy - The EU's response to the possible Israeli annexation in the West Bank (debate)
Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate)
The resumption of hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan in relation to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (debate)
Pharmaceutical strategy for Europe (debate)
Quality of water intended for human consumption – Implementation of the EU water legislation (debate)
Humanitarian situation of refugees and migrants at the EU's external borders (continuation of debate)
Inauguration of the new President of the United States and the current political situation (debate)
Tackling the economic impact of the COVID pandemic by focusing on investment, competitiveness and skills (debate)
Government attempts to silence free media in Poland, Hungary and Slovenia (debate)
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate)
Human rights protection and the EU external migration policy (debate)
Foreign interference in democratic processes (debate)
Natural disasters during the summer 2021 - Impacts of natural disasters in Europe due to climate change (debate)
EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation (debate)
UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, the UK (COP26) (debate)
Situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina (debate)
Outcome of the COP26 in Glasgow (debate)
Violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer(debate)
Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the EU (debate)
Cooperation and similarities between the Putin regime and extreme right and separatist movements in Europe (topical debate)
EU preparedness against cyber-attacks following Russia invasion on Ukraine (debate)
The relations of the Russian government and diplomatic network with parties of extremist, populist, anti-European and certain other European political parties in the context of the war (debate)
Shadow reports (4)
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism
REPORT on the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives
REPORT on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation
Shadow opinions (6)
OPINION on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan – How to finance the Green Deal
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards the amount of allowances to be placed in the market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme until 2030
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards strengthening the CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles in line with the Union’s increased climate ambition
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652
Institutional motions (4)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the climate and environmental emergency
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission regulation amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards lead in gunshot in or around wetlands
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the implementation of the EU water legislation
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian Ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
Oral questions (2)
Implementation of the EU water legislation
Implementation of the EU water legislation
Written explanations (167)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Romania, Italy and Austria (A9-0002/2019 - Siegfried Mureşan)
Prendiamo atto favorevolmente del voto espresso quest'oggi dal Parlamento europeo per la concessione di aiuti a valere sul Fondo di solidarietà in favore degli Stati colpiti dalle straordinarie calamità naturali nel 2018.I danni per l'Italia sono stati quantificati in oltre 6 miliardi di euro. Dobbiamo sottolineare come il nostro governo si sia immediatamente attivato finanziando i primi interventi urgenti e necessari e successivamente abbia messo in atto un'azione di investimenti senza precedenti. Il governo italiano, quello per capirci targato Lega, ha infatti provveduto a stanziare risorse proprie che per il prossimo triennio ammontano a 3 miliardi di euro, soldi che le regioni colpite hanno già iniziato a investire sul territorio.Resta il rammarico per l'esigua entità degli aiuti comunitari concessi attraverso un criterio che evidentemente non risulta corretto e, anzi, è particolarmente penalizzante per chi, come l'Italia, risulta essere tra i primi contribuenti dell'Unione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Active substances, including flumioxazine (B9-0103/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione, in quanto la Commissione, pur consapevole della pericolosità dell'erbicida flumiossazina per le sue caratteristiche di interferente endocrino, ha proposto di prorogarne l'autorizzazione, adducendo la ragione dei ritardi da parte di alcuni Stati membri nelle loro procedure di valutazione.Tuttavia, noi riteniamo che le ragioni della Commissione non siano sufficienti e quindi ho deciso di votare a favore di questa obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Active substances, including chlorotoluron (B9-0104/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione in quanto la Commissione, pur consapevole della pericolosità dell'erbicida clorotoluron per le sue caratteristiche di interferente endocrino, ha proposto di prorogarne l'autorizzazione, adducendo la ragione dei ritardi da parte di alcuni Stati membri nelle loro procedure di valutazione.Tuttavia, noi riteniamo che le ragioni della Commissione non siano sufficienti e quindi ho deciso di votare a favore di questa obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MZHG0JG (SYN-ØØØJG-2) (B9-0107/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti od ottenuti a partire da questo mais OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda la sua prassi, ormai consueta, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM, anche quando il comitato di esperti designati dagli Stati membri non è in grado di esprimere un parere.Bisogna tenere presente che il Parlamento, nel corso dell'ultima legislatura, ha già adottato 36 obiezioni ad OGM, ma la Commissione continua ad autorizzarli, pur non avendo nessun obbligo di farlo.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified soybean A2704-12 (ACS-GMØØ5-3) (B9-0105/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti od ottenuti a partire da questa soia OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda la sua prassi, ormai consueta, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM, anche quando il comitato di esperti designati dagli Stati membri non è in grado di esprimere un parere.Bisogna tenere presente che il Parlamento, nel corso dell'ultima legislatura, ha già adottato 36 obiezioni ad OGM, ma la Commissione continua ad autorizzarli, pur non avendo nessun obbligo di farlo. Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 × DAS-40278-9 and genetically modified maize combining two, three or four of the single events MON 89034, 1507, MON 88017, 59122 and DAS-40278-9 (B9-0106/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti od ottenuti a partire da questo mais OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda la sua prassi, ormai consueta, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM, anche quando il comitato di esperti designati dagli Stati membri non è in grado di esprimere un parere.Bisogna tenere presente che il Parlamento, nel corso dell'ultima legislatura, ha già adottato 36 obiezioni ad OGM, ma la Commissione continua ad autorizzarli, pur non avendo nessun obbligo di farlo.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Assessment of the impact of plant protection products on honeybees (B9-0149/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell’obiezione al progetto di regolamento della Commissione sulla valutazione dell’impatto dei pesticidi sulle api, in quanto la Commissione non ha preso in considerazione le risultanze degli studi scientifici più recenti, basati sulla valutazione della tossicità cronica e larvale che colpisce gli impollinatori in conseguenza all’utilizzo di alcuni fitofarmaci in agricoltura, riferendosi esclusivamente al vecchio criterio sulla tossicità acuta per ingestione e contatto.Ritengo di fondamentale importanza proteggere gli insetti pronubi basandosi su dati scientifici recenti, sia in relazione alla valenza che essi svolgono a favore del mantenimento degli equilibri ecologici, sia in funzione della salvaguardia della produzione mellifera e all’economia di questo importante settore produttivo.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified cotton LLCotton25 (ACS-GHØØ1-3) (B9-0170/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti, od ottenuti, a partire da questo cotone OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda questa prassi, ormai consolidata, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM in assenza del parere favorevole espresso dal comitato di esperti designato dagli Stati membri.I metodi di coltivazione degli OGM e la conseguente interazione con la biodiversità e la salute umana rimangono incerti e non supportati da sufficienti riscontri scientifici.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified soybean MON 89788 (MON-89788-1) (B9-0169/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti, od ottenuti, a partire da questa soia OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda questa prassi, ormai consolidata, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM, in assenza del parere favorevole espresso dal comitato di esperti designato dagli Stati Membri.I metodi di coltivazione degli OGM e la conseguente interazione con la biodiversità e la salute umana rimangono incerti e non supportati da sufficienti riscontri scientifici.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 and sub- combinations MON 89034 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9, 1507 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 and NK603 × DAS-40278-9 (B9-0171/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti, od ottenuti, a partire da questo mais OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda questa prassi, ormai consolidata, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM in assenza del parere favorevole espresso dal comitato di esperti designato dagli Stati membri.I metodi di coltivazione degli OGM e la conseguente interazione con la biodiversità e la salute umana rimangono incerti e non supportati da sufficienti riscontri scientifici.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × 1507 × 5307 × GA21 and genetically modified maize combining two, three, four or five of the single events Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, 1507, 5307 and GA21 (B9-0172/2019)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti od ottenuti a partire da questo mais OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda questa prassi, ormai consolidata, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM in assenza del parere favorevole espresso dal comitato di esperti designato dagli Stati membri.I metodi di coltivazione degli OGM e la conseguente interazione con la biodiversità e la salute umana rimangono incerti e non supportati da sufficienti riscontri scientifici.Poiché non è accettabile legittimare tale carenza democratica, ho espresso voto favorevole all'obiezione.
The European Green Deal (RC-B9-0040/2020, B9-0040/2020, B9-0041/2020, B9-0042/2020, B9-0043/2020, B9-0044/2020, B9-0045/2020, B9-0046/2020)
Ho espresso voto contrario alla risoluzione. Uno dei punti più deboli riguarda proprio il finanziamento del Green Deal ; nella risoluzione infatti è prevista l'introduzione di nuove tasse UE "verdi", replica degli attuali meccanismi di finanziamento, con le quali persistono vincoli di bilancio e norme sugli aiuti di Stato.
Annual report on the implementation of the common security and defence policy (A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean)
Ho espresso voto contrario alla relazione, perché non viene proposto nulla di concreto. Rispetto alle relazioni precedenti, si prevede inoltre di incrementare il livello di finanziamenti da parte degli Stati membri, per la creazione di ulteriori agenzie e uffici di coordinamento, da integrare alle Direzioni generali già esistenti.
Situation in Venezuela after the illegal election of the new National Assembly Presidency and Bureau (parliamentary coup) (B9-0051/2020, B9-0052/2020, B9-0053/2020, RC-B9-0048/2020, B9-0048/2020, B9-0049/2020, B9-0050/2020)
Ho deciso di votare a favore, poiché con questa risoluzione, si sostiene il rispetto dei diritti umani e l'adozione di sanzioni mirate contro gli individui che li violino. Inoltre, nella risoluzione si ribadisce come Guaidó, sia il presidente ad interim del paese, come già sostenuto dall'Alto Rappresentante e da più di cinquanta paesi.
Allocation of slots at Community airports: common rules
Ho espresso voto favorevole alla proposta di deroga della Commissione.Le compagnie aeree sono soggette al regolamento UE sulle bande orarie, per cui sono obbligate a utilizzare l'80 % degli slot loro assegnati per evitare di perderne il diritto, con conseguente rimessa sul mercato della banda oraria.In questo periodo di grave crisi, a causa della riduzione del numero dei passeggeri, alcune compagnie si sono viste costrette a cancellare molti voli e in alcuni casi a percorrere delle tratte senza passeggeri (voli fantasma) pur di non perdere i propri slot.Ritengo, inoltre, che questa deroga al regolamento dovrebbe essere estesa fino alla fine della stagione estiva aerea (24 ottobre 2020), al fine di poter garantire la piena ripresa del settore.
Specific measures to mobilise investments in the health care systems of the Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative)
Ho espresso voto favorevole alla proposta della Commissione di destinare 37 miliardi di EUR nell'ambito della Politica di coesione per la lotta contro il Coronavirus.L'Italia si trova ad affrontare un periodo di grave crisi, per cui l'iniziativa della Commissione di fornire un più rapido accesso a finanziamenti urgenti nei settori più colpiti (assistenza sanitaria, PMI, mercati del lavoro, servizi basati sulle comunità) è fondamentale.La proposta include la rinuncia da parte della Commissione, per quest'anno, all'obbligo di chiedere agli Stati membri il rimborso dei prefinanziamenti che non sono stati spesi a titolo del Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale, del Fondo sociale europeo, del Fondo di coesione e del Fondo europeo per gli affari marittimi e la pesca, per un importo di circa 8 miliardi di EUR.Tuttavia ritengo necessario dare maggior sostegno alle imprese, in particolare alle PMI che si trovano in una situazione di grande sofferenza economica.
Financial assistance to Member States and countries negotiating their accession to the Union that are seriously affected by a major public health emergency
Ho espresso voto favorevole, in quanto ritengo giusto sostenere la proposta della Commissione in questo periodo di profonda crisi economica e soprattutto umana, causata dal Coronavirus. In questo momento gli Stati Membri devono agire collettivamente e dare una risposta comune, che può essere espressa dal Fondo di Solidarietà. Penso però, sia necessario escludere la Turchia dall'applicazione del regolamento, considerando che i negoziati per la sua adesione sono stati sospesi.
Regulation amending the Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020
Per fronteggiare la pandemia da Covid-19, la Commissione propone di attivare lo strumento di sostegno d'emergenza (2,7 miliardi di EUR), e di rafforzare il Meccanismo europeo di protezione civile (300 milioni di EUR). Per questo scopo si rende necessaria la mobilitazione di alcuni strumenti speciali, tra i quali quello di flessibilità e il margine per gli imprevisti. Dato che l'utilizzo del margine globale per gli impegni (MGI) è attualmente riservato solamente all'occupazione giovanile, nonché alla migrazione e alle misure di sicurezza, la Commissione propone di togliere i riferimenti a "occupazione giovanile" e a "migrazione e misure di sicurezza" dalla formulazione degli articoli pertinenti all'interno del QFP, al fine di eliminare le limitazioni dell'ambito di applicazione del margine globale per gli impegni in modo da rendere possibile il finanziamento integrale dei 3,0 miliardi di EUR per la risposta alla pandemia da Covid-19.Ho espresso quindi voto positivo, trattandosi di una semplice modifica tecnica (senza implicazioni di bilancio) necessaria per modificare le finalità di destinazione all'interno del Quadro Finanziario Pluriennale.
Draft amending budget No 2/2020: Providing emergency support to Member States and further reinforcement of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak
L'obiettivo del progetto di bilancio rettificativo n. 2/2020 è fornire 3 miliardi di EUR in stanziamenti di impegno e 1,53 miliardi di EUR in stanziamenti di pagamento a titolo della rubrica III (Sicurezza e cittadinanza) per contribuire alla lotta all'emergenza Covid-19.La Commissione propone di aumentare lo strumento per il sostegno di emergenza di 3 miliardi di EUR, utilizzabili per: coordinare la distribuzione e il trasporto di risorse essenziali in tutta l'Europa, agevolare il trasporto transfrontaliero di pazienti verso ospedali che possono mettere a disposizione posti liberi, cooperare per alleviare la pressione sui sistemi sanitari delle regioni UE più colpite e convertire le capacità produttive delle imprese per garantire la rapida produzione delle attrezzature e dei materiali necessari. Inoltre, per il meccanismo unionale di protezione civile rescEU è proposto un rafforzamento di 450 milioni di EUR.Ho votato a favore perché trovo la proposta della Commissione positiva, considerando che le azioni descritte sarebbero sicuramente utili per le regioni del Nord Italia che sono state quelle più colpite da questa crisi.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for 2020: migration, refugee inflows and security threats; immediate measures in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak; reinforcement of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (C9-0096/2020)
I bilanci rettificativi nn. 1 e 2 del 2020 richiedono la mobilizzazione di tutti gli strumenti speciali previsti dal Bilancio dell'UE, ed in questo caso specifico dello strumento di flessibilità.La presente proposta modifica quindi la decisone di novembre 2019 legata al rettificativo n. 1, portando a 1 094,4 milioni di EUR l'importo totale da mobilitare spalmato su 4 esercizi di bilancio, ed esaurendo così ogni margine disponibile a valere su tale strumento per il 2020.Trattandosi di una misura direttamente legata alla precedente richiesta relativa allo strumento di flessibilità, e correlata in particolare al Bilancio rettificativo n. 2/2020, ho votato a favore.
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2020: providing emergency assistance to Member States and further reinforcing the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
Il regolamento che stabilisce il quadro finanziario pluriennale per il periodo 2014-2021 (QFP), consente di mobilizzare il margine per imprevisti fino allo 0,03% del reddito nazionale lordo dell'UE come strumento di ultima istanza per reagire a circostanze impreviste. I progetti di bilancio rettificativi 1 e 2, hanno esaurito il margine globale per gli impegni ed hanno comportato anche la richiesta di utilizzare i margini di flessibilità. L'ultima opzione che quindi resta disponibile è la mobilizzazione del margine per imprevisti per il 2020 per un importo di 714,6 milioni di EUR. Anche questa misura è direttamente collegata alle altre relative alla mobilitazione di aiuti, anche se in questo caso specifico si tratta di attivare l'unico strumento rimasto a disposizione in termini di bilancio, e quindi ho votato positivamente.
Specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
L'Iniziativa di investimento in risposta al coronavirus (CRII) si è concentrata sulla mobilitazione immediata di fondi strutturali per consentire una risposta rapida alla crisi. Il primo pacchetto consisteva di 3 elementi principali: circa 8 miliardi di euro di liquidità immediata per gli investimenti pubblici europei, flessibilità nell'applicazione delle norme sulla spesa dell'UE ed estensione dell'ambito di applicazione del FSUE.Il pacchetto odierno integra il primo, introducendo una flessibilità straordinaria affinché tutto il sostegno finanziario non utilizzato possa essere pienamente mobilitato. La flessibilità è garantita mediante: possibilità di trasferimento tra i 3 Fondi della politica di coesione (FESR, FSE e FC); trasferimenti tra le diverse categorie di regioni; flessibilità per quanto riguarda la concentrazione tematica.Sarà possibile un tasso di cofinanziamento dell'UE pari al 100% per i programmi della politica di coesione per l'esercizio 2020-2021, che consentirà agli Stati membri di beneficiare dell'intero finanziamento UE per fronteggiare la crisi. Il pacchetto CRII+ semplifica le fasi procedurali relative all'attuazione dei programmi.Il pacchetto fornisce inoltre sostegno agli indigenti modificando le norme del FEAD.Dal momento che è una misura necessaria per fronteggiare la crisi che stiamo vivendo, ho espresso voto favorevole.
Introduction of specific measures for addressing the COVID-19 crisis
Lo scopo del regolamento di modifica è quello di adattare il FEAD per far fronte alla sfida della pandemia di COVID-19.L'iniziativa di investimento in risposta al coronavirus (CRII) si è concentrata sulla mobilitazione immediata di fondi strutturali per consentire una risposta rapida alla crisi. Il primo pacchetto consisteva di 3 elementi principali: circa 8 miliardi di euro di liquidità immediata per gli investimenti pubblici europei, flessibilità nell'applicazione delle norme sulla spesa dell'UE ed estensione dell'ambito di applicazione del FSUE.Il pacchetto odierno integra il primo, introducendo una flessibilità straordinaria affinché tutto il sostegno finanziario non utilizzato possa essere pienamente mobilitato. La flessibilità è garantita mediante: possibilità di trasferimento tra i 3 Fondi della politica di coesione (FESR, FSE e FC); trasferimenti tra le diverse categorie di regioni; flessibilità per quanto riguarda la concentrazione tematica.Sarà possibile un tasso di cofinanziamento dell'UE pari al 100% per i programmi della politica di coesione per l'esercizio 2020-2021, che consentirà agli Stati membri di beneficiare dell'intero finanziamento UE per fronteggiare la crisi. Il pacchetto CRII+ semplifica le fasi procedurali relative all'attuazione dei programmi.Il pacchetto fornisce inoltre sostegno agli indigenti modificando le norme del FEAD.Dal momento che è una misura necessaria per fronteggiare la crisi che stiamo vivendo, ho espresso voto favorevole.
Specific measures to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in the fishery and aquaculture sector
Il settore della pesca è in crisi in tutta l'Unione europea, ma in particolare in Italia, dove i fattori di rischio si accumulano da molti anni. Politiche comunitarie poco efficienti nella gestione delle scorte, la poca valorizzazione del ruolo e del lavoro dei pescatori hanno notevolmente indebolito il settore. Le incertezze che esistevano già nel settore sono aumentate con le misure di contenimento imposte per rispondere al virus COVID19 e hanno fatto precipitare l'intero comparto in una crisi economica senza precedenti.Sul fronte della pesca, quindi, La Commissione sottopone al Parlamento una proposta legislativa volta a modificare il regolamento (UE) n. 508/2014 (il regolamento FEAMP) e il regolamento (UE) n. 1379/2013 (il regolamento OCM) per introdurre misure specifiche nel FEAMP al fine di attenuare l'impatto della pandemia di Covid-19 nel settore della pesca e dell'acquacoltura. Il mio voto è favorevole.
Medical devices (C9-0098/2020)
La Commissione ha adottato la proposta in votazione, che rinvia di un anno - al 26 maggio 2021 - la data di applicazione del regolamento sui dispositivi medici, al fine di ridurre al minimo qualsiasi disturbo alla fornitura di dispositivi medici essenziali durante l'attuale pandemia.Il CoRePer ha approvato degli emendamenti tecnici, che sono stati presentati identici in Parlamento a firma di tutti i coordinatori ENVI, che prevedono l'inclusione della nuova data, l'assicurazione che effettivamente l'etichettatura dei dispositivi più rischiosi inizierà prima rispetto a quelli di altre classi e due modifiche di mero formato, senza conseguenze giuridiche.Ho votato a favore delle modifiche tecniche.
EU-Montenegro status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro (A9-0018/2020 - Bettina Vollath)
Ho votato a favore per la conclusione di un accordo tra il Montenegro e l'Agenzia europea della Guardia di frontiera e costiera Frontex, titolata ad effettuare interventi presso paesi terzi confinanti con almeno uno Stato membro UE, ritenendo che questa peculiare fruizione dell'Agenzia presso Stati terzi, sia sostenibile nell'ottica di una più efficace gestione dei flussi migratori.
EU-Serbia status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Serbia (A9-0019/2020 - Bettina Vollath)
Ho votato a favore per la conclusione di un accordo tra la Serbia e l'Agenzia europea della Guardia di frontiera e costiera Frontex, titolata ad effettuare interventi presso Paesi terzi confinanti con almeno uno Stato membro UE, ritenendo che questa peculiare fruizione dell'Agenzia presso Stati terzi, sia sostenibile nell'ottica di una più efficace gestione dei flussi migratori.
EU-Belarus Agreement on readmission of persons residing without authorisation (A9-0097/2020 - Petar Vitanov)
Ho votato a favore dell'accordo che è rivolto ad instaurare procedure rapide ed efficaci per il rimpatrio sicuro e ordinato dei cittadini che non soddisfano o non possiedono più le condizioni di ingresso, presenza o soggiorno, ritenendo di sostenere sempre gli accordi di riammissione, in particolare per le persone che dovessero accedere illegalmente sul territorio europeo.
EU-Belarus Agreement on facilitation of issuance of visas (A9-0090/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
Amending the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) - Protocol (A9-0089/2020 - Rosanna Conte)
Ho votato a favore dell'emendamento al fine di rafforzare la gestione sostenibile delle risorse biologiche marine, intesa ad ampliare l'ambito di applicazione delle specie catturate in attività di pesca regolamentate dalla Commissione internazionale per la conservazione dei tonnidi dell'Atlantico, tramite l'inclusione degli squali e delle razze.
EC-Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution. Extension of the Protocol (A9-0088/2020 - Clara Aguilera)
Mi sono astenuto dal votare per il prolungamento dell'accordo di pesca con la Repubblica di Mauritania, che consente il prolungamento per un anno della possibilità di un massimo di 58 navi, provenienti dai paesi UE, di pescare nelle acque mauritane, in quanto l'Italia non è direttamente interessata a questa disciplina che comporta invece un ingente esborso finanziario da parte dell'UE.
International road passenger transport services by coach and bus in the border regions: cabotage operations between Germany and Switzerland (A9-0006/2020 - Markus Ferber)
Ho votato a favore dell'accordo bilaterale tra Germania e Svizzera al fine di autorizzare operazioni di cabotaggio nell'ambito dei servizi di trasporto dei passeggeri a mezzo autobus nelle regioni frontaliere tra i due Paesi, senza subire imposizioni da parte dell'UE, allo scopo che i predetti Paesi possano tutelare al meglio i propri interessi.
International road passenger transport services by coach and bus in the border regions: cabotage operations between Italy and Switzerland (A9-0007/2020 - Markus Ferber)
Ho votato a favore della proposta, sostenendo che l'Italia svolga un accordo proprio e autonomo con la Svizzera, considerata anche la volontà rappresentata dalla Regione Lombardia in relazione alla strategicità del settore, nell'interesse delle parti pubbliche e private coinvolte e per favorire l'accesso al mercato per le imprese.
Minimum requirements for water reuse (A9-0098/2020 - Simona Bonafè)
Mi sono astenuto sul voto relativo al regolamento che stabilisce le prescrizioni minime applicabili alla qualità dell'acqua e all'utilizzo delle acque trattate per il loro riutilizzo in agricoltura, in quanto ritengo che tali prescrizioni debbano essere gestite in maniera discrezionale da ogni singolo Stato membro, in funzione alle proprie condizioni geo-climatiche, valutando propriamente il riutilizzo delle acque depurate ai fini dell'irrigazione agricola sull'intero territorio o su singole parti di esso e per usi diversi. La materia è già disciplinata da due direttive, quella quadro sull'acqua e quella sul trattamento delle acque reflue urbane, di carattere locale per definizione.
Genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127 (B9-0121/2020)
Ho votato a favore dell'obiezione al rinnovo dell'autorizzazione per l'immissione in commercio di prodotti contenenti, costituiti od ottenuti a partire da questa soia OGM.Ritengo importante dare un segnale alla Commissione affinché sospenda questa prassi, ormai consolidata, di approvare gli atti di esecuzione concernenti l'autorizzazione di OGM in assenza del parere favorevole espresso dal comitato di esperti designato dagli Stati membri.I metodi di coltivazione degli OGM e la conseguente interazione con la biodiversitá e la salute umana rimangono incerti e non supportati da sufficienti riscontri scientifici.
Discharge 2018: European Union Agency for Railways (A9-0061/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Ho espresso voto negativo alla relazione sul discarico per l'esecuzione del bilancio generale dell'Unione europea (ERA) per l'esercizio 2020 dell'Agenzia ferroviaria europea, perché ritengo che l'Agenzia necessiti di maggior supervisione e controllo sui costi e sui risultati raggiunti. Inoltre le attività ERA vengono svolte all'interno dei seggi francesi di Lilla e Valenciennes, esponendo la stessa all'aumento dei costi di gestione. In un contesto di crisi economica e sanitaria come quello odierno, ritengo che le agenzie europee debbano essere controllate in maniera rigorosa e che la loro esistenza ed i fondi stanziati per le attività debbano essere realisticamente giustificati.
Discharge 2018: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A9-0031/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
Ho votato a favore sulla concessione del discarico alla Corte dei conti. La Corte dei conti tra le istituzioni UE è infatti l'unica ad esprimere il ruolo di garante nella spesa dei fondi pubblici per mezzo di una supervisione annuale delle entrate e delle uscite delle varie istituzioni e delle agenzie europee, strumento necessario per rendere evidenti eventuali errori, mala gestione e frodi, che potrebbero celarsi all'interno del bilancio dell'Unione europea.
Temporary measures concerning the general meetings of European companies (SE) and of European Cooperative Societies (SCE)
Il regolamento (CE) n. 2157/2001 del Consiglio, dell'8 ottobre 2001, relativo allo statuto della Società europea (SE) e il regolamento (CE) n. 1435/2003 del Consiglio, del 22 luglio 2003, relativo allo statuto della Società cooperativa europea (SCE), stabiliscono le norme per la costituzione e il funzionamento delle rispettive entità che essi disciplinano (SE e SCE). Entrambi i regolamenti inoltre, armonizzano il termine per lo svolgimento dell'assemblea generale.Poiché le circostanze eccezionali dovute alla Covid-19 esulano dal controllo sia delle SE e delle SCE, sia degli Stati membri, la presente proposta stabilisce a livello dell'UE, una deroga temporanea al termine di cui all'articolo 54 del regolamento SE e all'articolo 54 del regolamento SCE. Tale deroga temporanea dovrebbe consentire alle SE e alle SCE di tenere l'assemblea generale entro 12 mesi dalla chiusura dell'esercizio ma comunque non oltre il 31 dicembre 2020. Tale deroga temporanea è necessaria per consentire alle SE e alle SCE di provvedere ai preparativi necessari per l'assemblea generale, e fornire la certezza del diritto per quanto riguarda l'adempimento degli obblighi previsti dai regolamenti SE e SCE, perció, ho espresso voto positivo.
Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2021 (A9-0102/2020 - Olivier Chastel)
Si tratta della relazione che analizza il bilancio del Parlamento europeo, previsto per il prossimo anno, che in questo caso coincide anche con il primo del nuovo ciclo di programmazione 2021-2027. L'accordo finale raggiunto tra la commissione bilanci e l'Ufficio di Presidenza, fissa un importo con un incremento del 2,54% rispetto al 2020.Tra le altre, viene poi sottolineata l'intenzione dell'Istituzione di espandere le proprie attività e la propria presenza diplomatica oltre le frontiere dell'Unione in Indonesia (Giacarta), Etiopia (Addis Abeba) e Stati Uniti (New York), e si coglie con favore la proposta di potenziare l'Evento europeo per i giovani (EYE)La volontà di aumentare la visibilità dell'Istituzione, sia attraverso "esperienze mobili" o uffici locali in UE, o fuori, serve esclusivamente a beneficio della linea politica decisa dalla maggioranza di Bruxelles, per cui l'impostazione è sempre quella di voler sottolineare quanto di buono faccia l'Unione per i cittadini e non anche le difficoltà provocate da numerose scelte scellerate prese in tutti questi anni.I pochi elementi positivi presenti nel testo di quest'anno non mi consentono in ogni caso di modificare la mia posizione rispetto ad un voto negativo.
EU disability strategy post 2020 (B9-0123/2020)
Relazione ampiamente condivisibile, sulla strategia europea per la disabilità post 2020, nella quale compaiono anche i diversi contributi portati dalla nostra delegazione, sotto forma di emendamenti. La relazione è stata approvata all'unanimità in commissione EMPL. Abbiamo presentato 4 emendamenti per la Plenaria, volti a sottolineare soprattutto la necessità del riconoscimento reciproco dello stato di disabilità fra i diversi Paesi dell'UE, al fine di stabilire norme e diritti comuni (civili, politici, economici e sociali) per le persone disabili.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Setting up a committee of inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to the protection of animals during transport within and outside the Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0191/2020)
. – Con questa votazione, il Parlamento decide di costituire una commissione d'inchiesta incaricata di esaminare le denunce di infrazione nell'applicazione del diritto dell'Unione, in relazione all'attuazione da parte degli Stati membri e al controllo dell'applicazione ,da parte della Commissione europea del regolamento (CE) n. 1/2005. A questo organismo verrebbe assegnata una funzione di controllo delle eventuali inadempienze della Commissione europea, nel vigilare l'operato degli Stati membri ma, fattore discutibile e controverso, il compito di vagliare le "denunce" di inadempienza provenienti dalla "società civile", in merito alle violazioni di legge sul trasporto di animali vivi. Pur riconoscendo che esistono situazioni e casi di mancato rispetto delle suddette norme, e che il grado di evoluzione e di presidio delle prescrizioni sanitarie e veterinarie nei diversi paesi dell'Unione, incide sul manifestarsi di quelle realtà, segnaliamo la grande opera di strumentalizzazione a danno del settore zootecnico che potrebbe trovare, in questa commissione speciale, legittimazione e vigore. Perciò mi sono astenuto dal voto.
Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation: deferring certain time limits due to the COVID-19 pandemic (C9-0134/2020)
La direttiva ha origine dalla richiesta avanzata da parte di un certo numero di Stati membri, i quali hanno domandato il rinvio di alcuni termini di comunicazione e lo scambio di informazioni, ai sensi della direttiva 2011/16/UE del Consiglio, del 15 febbraio 2011, relativa alla cooperazione amministrativa nel settore fiscale. La crisi causata dalla pandemia CODIV, e più specificatamente le varie perturbazioni professionali dovute al lavoro a distanza a causa del confinamento, ha messo infatti istituzioni e persone fisiche nell'impossibilità di comunicare questi dati, per lo più relativi a meccanismi transfrontalieri, e, di conseguenza, ha messo gli Stati nell'incapacità di raccoglierli.Con questa direttiva si apportano quindi modifiche ai termini per la comunicazione e lo scambio di informazioni sui conti finanziari, i cui beneficiari sono fiscalmente residenti in un altro Stato membro e ai meccanismi transfrontalieri soggetti a notifica, facendo slittare di circa tre mesi tutte le date originariamente previste.Si prevede inoltre la possibilità di prorogare una volta, il periodo di rinvio per la comunicazione e lo scambio di informazioni, nel caso in cui se ne presenti ancora una necessità, attraverso atti delegati della Commissione.Ho espresso quindi, voto favorevole.
European citizens’ initiative: temporary measures concerning the time limits for the collection, verification and examination stages in view of the COVID-19 outbreak (C9-0142/2020 - Loránt Vincze)
Al fine di preservare l'efficacia dello strumento dell'iniziativa dei cittadini europei, durante la pandemia e fornire rassicurazioni e chiarezza giuridica agli organizzatori delle iniziative, la cui fase di raccolta, verifica o esame è in corso, occorre adottare misure temporanee che consentano di prolungare i corrispondenti periodi di raccolta. Dovrebbero essere adottate misure temporanee analoghe per consentire agli Stati membri, di chiedere alla Commissione europea una proroga del periodo di verifica, nel caso in cui le loro autorità competenti non possano completare la verifica entro i termini, a seguito delle misure adottate per contrastare la pandemia.Analogamente, il Parlamento europeo e la Commissione europea dovrebbero essere autorizzati a rinviare l'audizione pubblica e la riunione con gli organizzatori fino al momento in cui la situazione sanitaria nel paese, in cui intendono organizzare tali riunioni, consenta la tenuta dell'evento Il periodo corrispondente per l'esame di un'iniziativa valida dovrebbe essere prorogato di conseguenza.Non ravvisando particolari criticità ho espresso un voto finale favorevole.
The PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy (RC-B9-0169/2020, B9-0169/2020, B9-0171/2020, B9-0173/2020, B9-0174/2020, B9-0176/2020, B9-0181/2020, B9-0193/2020)
La risoluzione deplora l'introduzione unilaterale della legislazione sulla sicurezza nazionale da parte di Pechino a Hong Kong, in quanto si tratta di un attacco globale all'autonomia della città, allo stato di diritto e alle libertà fondamentali, che minaccia l'integrità di "Un Paese, due sistemi" come stabilito dalla dichiarazione congiunta sino-britannica.Si condannano le continue interferenze cinesi negli affari interni di Hong Kong, nonché le ripetute violazioni dei diritti umani nei confronti di centinaia di attivisti e gruppi di opposizione. Si chiede inoltre di vincolare i futuri negoziati per un accordo di investimento UE-Cina al rispetto dei diritti umani e delle libertà fondamentali, anche per fare pressione sulle autorità cinesi affinché mantengano l'elevato grado di autonomia di Hong Kong.Ho espresso perciò voto favorevole.
European protection of cross-border and seasonal workers in the context of the COVID-19 crisis (B9-0172/2020)
La risoluzione evidenzia la necessità di tutelare i lavoratori frontalieri e stagionali colpiti dalla crisi del COVID-19. Questi lavoratori sono stati infatti tra i più penalizzati dalla pandemia di Coronavirus e dalla conseguente chiusura delle frontiere e necessitano quindi di opportune misure di protezione sociale e previdenziale.Negli emendamenti che abbiamo presentato, oltre a sottolineare come l'accesso al mercato del lavoro e le politiche sociali e nazionali siano di competenza degli Stati membri, affrontiamo anche il tema molto attuale dei lavoratori stagionali. A questo proposito respingiamo ogni tentativo di regolarizzare gli immigrati clandestini che vengono impiegati come lavoratori stagionali e chiediamo di valutare l'introduzione di voucher per regolamentare questi lavori e far fronte al bisogno di manodopera, dando ovviamente precedenza ai tanti lavoratori italiani (o immigrati regolari) disoccupati e in cerca di lavoro.Per questo, il mio voto è stato positivo.
Proposal for a Council decision authorising Portugal to apply a reduced rate of excise duty on certain alcoholic products produced in the autonomous regions of Madeira and the Azores (A9-0140/2020 - Younous Omarjee)
La Commissione sta presentando proposte di deroghe fiscali nelle regioni ultra periferiche, ai sensi dell'articolo 349 del TFUE, in questo caso con riferimento specifico ai prodotti alcolici provenienti dalle regioni autonome di Madeira e delle Azzorre.L'articolo 349 consente deroghe alle norme dell'UE nelle regioni ultra periferiche, al fine di compensare in parte la loro posizione remota e le difficoltà specifiche. La presente proposta fa parte di una serie di proposte che applicheranno tali deroghe in materia fiscale per la durata del prossimo quadro finanziario pluriennale, ossia il 2021-2027.I coordinatori REGI hanno esaminato la questione il 6 luglio 2020 e hanno deciso che tali deroghe devono essere trattate secondo la procedura semplificata senza modifiche, in considerazione della loro urgenza e del loro carattere non controverso.Ho espresso voto favorevole, anche sulla procedura semplificata. Questa deroga alle norme fiscali è giustificata dalla sua portata estremamente limitata e dalle difficoltà economiche inerenti alla produzione nelle regioni interessate.
Effective measures to “green” Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps (A9-0141/2020 - Laurence Farreng)
Scopo del bilancio rettificativo (DAB) n. 8/2020 è fornire 6,2 miliardi di EUR in stanziamenti di pagamento per finanziare anche la strategia per i vaccini contro la COVID-19.Nello specifico la Commissione ha concluso un accordo con tutti gli Stati membri per negoziare e stipulare accordi preliminari con i produttori di vaccini. Gli stanziamenti di pagamento attuali sono insufficienti a soddisfare le obbligazioni contrattuali che la Commissione prevede di assumere e pertanto, oltre il rafforzamento di 140 milioni di EUR già approvato dall'autorità di bilancio nel mese di luglio 2020, si propone un ulteriore stanziamento di pagamento nell'esercizio 2020 pari a 1 090 milioni di EUR. Per questo file è stata utilizzata la procedura d'urgenza a norma dell'articolo 163 del regolamento PE, che sostanzialmente bypassa il normale iter in commissione parlamentare.Al di là di ogni considerazione sull'opportunità di utilizzare la procedura d'urgenza per questo file, ritengo doveroso sostenere con un voto favorevole l'esborso di questi fondi, soprattutto poiché si tratta di pagamenti e non di impegni, che implicherebbero tempistiche incerte e dilatate, ed anche nel merito degli stanziamenti non ritengo ci siano particolari criticità.
Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A9-0148/2020 - Nikos Androulakis)
Il Meccanismo unionale di protezione civile, fin dalla sua istituzione, ha aiutato gli Stati membri a far fronte a catastrofi naturali sempre più frequenti ed è stato uno dei pochi strumenti di solidarietà impiegati durante la recente emergenza sanitaria.Il meccanismo continua a basarsi sulla disponibilità e sulla prontezza degli Stati membri e presenta ancora dei punti deboli, come emerso negli ultimi mesi. Questo sistema di mutua solidarietà europea tende infatti a vacillare se molti Stati membri sono colpiti dalla stessa emergenza simultaneamente.In quanto relatore ombra di questo dossier ho avuto l'opportunità di seguirne attivamente i lavori e di proporre gli opportuni emendamenti.Coordinandomi fin da subito con la Protezione Civile nazionale, mi sono focalizzato su alcuni punti, cercando in particolare di bilanciare il rapporto tra gestione diretta e gestione indiretta delle risorse e di imporre il divieto di dispiegare i mezzi di rescEU al di fuori dell'Unione europea.Pur essendoci alcuni aspetti critici, come l'estensione alla Commissione del potere di acquistare, possedere e gestire operativamente le risorse rescEU, ritengo che la proposta di decisione vada accolta positivamente, pertanto ho espresso voto favorevole.
Shortage of medicines - how to address an emerging problem
La crisi sanitaria della COVID-19, con l'impennata esponenziale della domanda mondiale, non ha fatto altro che accentuare il fenomeno ricorrente di carenza di medicinali e di attrezzature mediche in Europa. La crisi sanitaria della COVID-19 ha inoltre messo in luce una dipendenza sempre maggiore dell'Unione europea da paesi terzi, segnatamente Cina e India. La sanità pubblica è divenuta un'arma geostrategica che può mettere in ginocchio un continente. La nostra perdita di sovranità si è manifestata con l'attuale pandemia.La relazione sottolinea l'imperativo geostrategico per l'Unione e gli Stati membri di riconquistare la sua indipendenza in materia di assistenza sanitaria, garantire una fornitura rapida ed efficiente di medicinali; sottolinea l'importanza di garantire che tutti gli Stati membri abbiano accesso in modo equo alla catena di approvvigionamento; osserva la necessità che l'industria farmaceutica dell'Unione disponga di una catena di approvvigionamento diversificata e di un piano di attenuazione del rischio di carenza di medicinali al fine di gestire le eventuali vulnerabilità e i rischi per la sua catena di approvvigionamento.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Preparation of the Special European Council, focusing on the dangerous escalation and the role of Turkey in the Eastern-Mediterranean
Nella risoluzione si citano le vicende che hanno portato alla situazione turca attuale, culminata con l'incidente tra navi francesi e turche e alle recenti tensioni al largo dell'isola greca di Kastellorizo.Si chiede di interrompere le attività di esplorazione e trivellazione, operate in violazione della legittima sovranità di due Stati membri e si esprime piena solidarietà e sostegno a Cipro e alla Grecia.Si invitano tutte le parti in causa ad assumersi un autentico impegno collettivo al fine di negoziare in buona fede la delimitazione delle ZEE e della piattaforma continentale, considerando che anche la NATO ha proposto varie iniziative di dialogo tra la Grecia e la Turchia.Si ribadisce che un approccio incentrato su dialogo e negoziati è l'unica via per la risoluzione dei conflitti ed eviterà di imporre sanzioni; si chiede al Consiglio di essere pronto a intervenire con un pacchetto di sanzioni mirate e settoriali qualora non ci fossero significativi progressi da parte turca.Nonostante manchi una condanna netta alla Turchia e non si accenna minimamente all'interruzione definitiva dei negoziati di adesione della Turchia, ho espresso voto favorevole alla relazione congiunta per ribadire la nostra posizione sul tema e continuare comunque a mettere pressione al regime di Erdogan.
Sustainable rail market in view of COVID-19 outbreak
La proposta di regolamento prevede misure in favore degli operatori ferroviari per far fronte alla crisi pandemica COVID-19 e stabilisce norme temporanee sull'imposizione dei canoni per l'utilizzo dell'infrastruttura ferroviaria.Il trasporto ferroviario di merci e quello di passeggeri hanno subito una notevole diminuzione dei volumi trasportati a causa delle restrizioni e del calo della domanda dei settori industriali e produttivi. Le misure proposte di cui beneficeranno gli operatori ferroviari regolano la rinuncia da parte dei gestori ai canoni di accesso per l'utilizzo dell'infrastruttura ferroviaria, la relativa riduzione o il relativo rinvio, nonché la rinuncia ai canoni di prenotazione della capacità. Gli Stati dovranno rimborsare le minori entrate dei gestori infrastrutturali in tempi più celeri rispetto a quanto previsto attualmente. La discrezione di attuare le misure e i rispettivi piani di intervento resta in campo agli Stati membri.Esprimendo voto positivo, sostengo complessivamente la proposta che va incontro alle esigenze degli operatori ferroviari che hanno attualmente difficoltà di cassa per pagare i canoni di accesso all'infrastruttura in seguito al calo della domanda. L'Italia tra l'altro ha già adottato alcune misure in tale direzione.
Amending Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards the decommitment procedure
La proposta costituisce una modifica tecnica del regolamento sulla cosiddetta procedura di disimpegno. In particolare, la modifica si riferisce all'attuazione dei programmi nazionali nell'ambito del Fondo Asilo, migrazione e integrazione (AMIF) e del Fondo Sicurezza interna (ISF) per il periodo 2014-2020. La situazione senza precedenti dovuta alla pandemia di COVID-19 in molti casi ha impedito ai beneficiari dei fondi AMIF e ISF di attuare pienamente il progetto previsto.La modifica consentirà quindi ai beneficiari dei fondi per gli affari interni di portare a termine le attività interrotte e di eliminare i ritardi nell'attuazione dei progetti dovuti alla pandemia.Pur non condividendo appieno gli scopi dei programmi Asilo, migrazione e integrazione (AMIF) e del Fondo Sicurezza interna (ISF) ritengo la proposta di natura prevalentemente tecnico-contabile e quindi necessaria al fine di garantire che le richieste di pagamento presentate da uno Stato membro entro i termini regolamentari siano prese in considerazione. Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion: indirect taxes on 'traditional' rum
Come la proposta di regolamento sulle accise speciali per Madera e per le Azzorre, questo progetto di risoluzione si basa su una decisione del Consiglio che autorizza un regime fiscale favorevole (accise e contributi sociali) per la produzione di rum originario della Guadalupa, della Martinica, della Guyana francese e della Riunione.Tra gli obbiettivi della proposta: mantenere e migliorare le deroghe fiscali esistenti affinché Guadalupa, Martinica, Guyana francese e Riunione possano beneficiarne a partire dal 1° gennaio 2021; compensare lo svantaggio competitivo dei produttori di rum, brandy e liquori delle regioni ultraperiferiche francesi (RUP) a causa dei vincoli permanenti delle regioni stesse; sostenere l'industria delle bevande alcoliche nelle RUP francesi, importante per lo sviluppo delle economie delle RUP ed infine la diversificazione delle attività locali e garantire il corretto funzionamento del mercato unico delle bevande alcoliche.Ho espresso voto positivo.
AIEM tax in the Canary Islands
L'articolo 349 TFUE consente l'adozione di misure specifiche nei confronti delle regioni ultraperiferiche dell'UE, in quanto riconosce l'esistenza di vincoli permanenti e combinati che recano grave danno allo sviluppo di queste regioni e incidono sulla loro situazione sociale ed economica.La proposta riguarda una decisione del Consiglio intesa a sostituire la decisione n. 377/2014/UE attualmente in vigore. Tale decisione, adottata sulla base dell'articolo 349 TFUE, autorizza la Spagna ad applicare fino al 31 dicembre 2020 esenzioni o riduzioni dell'imposta "AIEM" (Arbitrio sobre Importaciones y Entregas de Mercancías en las Islas Canarias) per taluni prodotti fabbricati nelle Isole Canarie. Il 24 aprile 2019 la Spagna ha presentato alla Commissione la richiesta di prorogare fino al 31 dicembre 2027 il periodo di applicazione della decisione n. 377/2014/UE.Questa deroga alle norme fiscali è giustificata dalla sua portata estremamente limitata e dalle difficoltà economiche inerenti alla produzione nelle regioni interessate; ho espresso voto favorevole.
Docks dues extension in the French outermost regions
L'imposta detta "dazi di mare" è un'imposta indiretta in vigore esclusivamente nelle regioni ultraperiferiche (RUP) francesi della Martinica, della Guadalupa, della Guyana francese, della Riunione e di Mayotte. Questa imposta si applica alle importazioni di beni, a prescindere dalla loro provenienza, e alle forniture di beni a titolo oneroso da parte di soggetti che esercitano attività di produzione. In linea di principio si applica nello stesso modo sia ai prodotti fabbricati localmente che ai prodotti importati.Il regime dei dazi di mare era stato votato per il periodo 2015-2020. Il suo obiettivo era quello di compensare i costi aggiuntivi sostenuti dalle imprese delle regioni ultraperiferiche che ostacolano la loro piena partecipazione al mercato unico. La crisi del Covid-19 ha interrotto le procedure di valutazione dell'efficacia di questo schema. Si propone pertanto di rinnovarlo per sei mesi dopo la data ufficiale di scadenza della precedente decisione del Consiglio, ossia il 31 dicembre 2020.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Application of railway safety and interoperability rules within the Channel tunnel (C9-0212/2020)
Questa proposta relativa alla Brexit mira a modificare la Direttiva (UE) n. 2016/798 in materia di sicurezza ferroviaria e interoperabilità all'interno dell'Eurotunnel, dato che la commissione intergovernativa creata dal trattato sulla costruzione e l'esercizio della Manica (Trattato di Canterbury) non prevede la partecipazione di un paese terzo.Il Regno Unito avrà lo status di paese terzo al termine del periodo di transizione stabilito dall'accordo di recesso il 31 dicembre 2020, quindi si propone di consentire all'autorità intergovernativa responsabile per la sicurezza di applicare il diritto dell'Unione anche alla tratta di competenza del Regno Unito.Parallelamente, la proposta di decisione per autorizzare la Francia a negoziare e concludere un accordo internazionale con il Regno Unito mira a mantenere la commissione intergovernativa come unica autorità nazionale di sicurezza per l'Eurotunnel. Ho espresso voto positivo, sostengo infatti che la proposta non contenga particolari criticità e fa parte delle conseguenze dell'accordo di recesso del Regno Unito dall'UE.
Organic production: date of application and certain other dates (C9-0286/2020)
Il regolamento di base è un'importante modifica delle regole applicabili alle produzioni biologiche. Oggi è fondamentale non perturbare un mercato relativamente fragile e dare tempo al settore biologico per adattarsi al nuovo quadro giuridico.Poiché la richiesta arriva all'unanimità dalle associazioni interprofessionali e dagli Stati membri, ho votato a favore.Il regolamento del 30 maggio 2018 (UE) n. 2018/848 stabilisce un nuovo quadro normativo per la produzione e commercializzazione di prodotti agricoli biologici certificati. Dovrebbe entrare in vigore il 1° gennaio 2021.La situazione sanitaria ha ritardato sia le trattative a livello interistituzionale (18 atti delegati sono ancora in preparazione), sia la capacità di mettere in atto il nuovo quadro normativo da parte dei professionisti del settore biologico.Questo regolamento di modifica richiede quindi il rinvio di un anno dell'entrata in vigore del regolamento in questione.
Discharge 2018: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council (A9-0189/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
Intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (A9-0176/2020 - Stéphane Séjourné)
La relazione delinea una serie di raccomandazioni per la creazione di un quadro giuridico attinente ai diritti di proprietà intellettuale (DPI) per lo sviluppo di tecnologie di intelligenza artificiale ed alle definizioni comuni indispensabili alla sicurezza giuridica.Si suggerisce alla Commissione di effettuare una valutazione d'impatto sulle implicazioni dell'IA e delle tecnologie correlate nell'ambito dell'attuale sistema di diritto dei brevetti, protezione dei marchi e dei disegni e modelli, diritto d'autore e diritti connessi, compresa la protezione giuridica delle banche dati e dei programmi informatici, e i "segreti commerciali".La relazione prende adeguatamente in conto le differenti specificità dei settori industriali e prevede un coinvolgimento degli stakeholders e key players nella definizione del futuro quadro normativo.Considerato il bilanciamento generale del testo, ho espresso voto positivo.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the VPC/HR on relations with Belarus (A9-0167/2020 - Petras Auštrevičius)
La relazione sulla raccomandazione del Parlamento europeo per le relazioni con la Bielorussia spazia su vari argomenti (situazione post elezioni nel Paese, situazione politica, diritti umani e libertà dei media, cooperazione settoriale ed economica, contatti interpersonali tra popoli) ribadendo la netta condanna nei confronti di Lukashenko e la richiesta di nuove elezioni, libere e regolari, la difesa dei diritti fondamentali e la condanna di ogni violenza e repressione, il rilascio dei prigionieri politici.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Common system of value added tax: identification of taxable persons in Northern Ireland (A9-0200/2020 - Irene Tinagli)
Si tratta di una proposta del Consiglio che modifica la direttiva 2006/112/CE relativa al sistema comune d'imposta sul valore aggiunto (IVA) per quanto riguarda l'identificazione dei soggetti passivi nell'Irlanda del Nord.La modifica si rende necessaria in seguito al recesso di Gran Bretagna e Irlanda del Nord dall'Unione europea.Parte dell'accordo di recesso è il protocollo Irlanda/Irlanda del Nord, il quale prevede che, al fine di evitare una frontiera fisica tra l'Irlanda e l'Irlanda del Nord, la normativa dell'Unione sull'IVA troverà ancora applicazione nell'Irlanda del Nord, anche dopo il periodo di transizione, per quanto riguarda i beni.In questo modo, coesisteranno la normativa dell'Unione sull'IVA per le operazioni in beni nell'Irlanda del Nord, accanto alla normativa del Regno Unito sull'IVA, per tutte le altre operazioni nel Regno Unito, anche nei confronti dell'Irlanda del Nord.Il Consiglio propone quindi che i numeri di identificazione IVA nell'Irlanda del Nord abbiano un prefisso specifico "XI". In questo modo le imprese, in particolare quelle attive negli scambi di beni da e verso l'Irlanda del Nord, potranno più facilmente comprendere quali siano le norme applicabili. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (A9-0128/2020 - Manuel Pizarro)
Si tratta dell'accordo in prima lettura sulla proposta del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio che modifica la decisione n. 573/2014/UE, su una cooperazione rafforzata tra i servizi pubblici per l'impiego (SPI). In pratica si proroga la cooperazione rafforzata dei servizi pubblici per l'impiego fino al 2027. Gli SPI sono uno strumento importante che ha avuto in generale un impatto positivo sui cittadini; per questo è stato deciso di prorogarli. Ritengo che il testo finale dell'accordo con il Consiglio sia equilibrato, quindi ho votato a favore.
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
La crisi COVID-19 ha messo in luce numerose difficoltà, tra cui il fatto che l'Unione dipenda da Paesi terzi per garantire la fornitura di materie prime, materiali di base chimici e principi attivi farmaceutici, alcuni farmaci; tutti elementi strettamente necessari durante la crisi che stiamo vivendo. Il programma dovrebbe pertanto fornire sostegno alle azioni che aumenteranno la sicurezza della produzione, dell'approvvigionamento, della gestione e della distribuzione di farmaci e dispositivi medici nell'Unione e ridurranno la dipendenza dai Paesi terzi incoraggiando la diversificazione delle catene di approvvigionamento, promuovendo la produzione nell'UE.Le azioni sostenute nell'ambito del programma dovrebbero riguardare il coordinamento delle attività che rafforzano l'interoperabilità e la coerenza dei sistemi sanitari degli Stati membri, al fine di ridurre al minimo le possibili minacce di carattere transfrontaliero per la sanità pubblica. Ho espresso voto positivo.
InvestEU Programme (A9-203/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Irene Tinagli)
Si tratta della proposta della Commissione per la creazione del programma InvestEU per il quadro finanziario pluriennale 2021-2027, al fine di riunire in un'unica struttura tutti i finanziamenti del bilancio UE sotto forma di prestiti e garanzie. Il programma vuole definire una strategia europea di investimenti pubblici e privati, per colmare le persistenti lacune in materia di investimenti in diversi settori.Il Gruppo della Banca europea per gli investimenti (BEI) è il partner di attuazione privilegiato nell'ambito del Fondo InvestEU. La proposta introduce inoltre: il polo di consulenza di InvestEU, che fornisce in particolare assistenza tecnica per lo sviluppo dei progetti; il portale InvestEU, che fornisce una banca dati accessibile per promuovere i progetti in cerca di finanziamenti.Nel complesso la proposta sembra rappresentare un buon strumento di sostegno agli investimenti pubblici e privati, specie nell'ambito della ripresa dopo la pandemia da COVID. Inoltre non presenta condizionalità per gli Stati membri, ho pertanto espresso voto positivo.
Addressing product safety in the single market (A9-0207/2020 - Marion Walsmann)
La relazione di iniziativa contiene una serie di ottime raccomandazioni e possibili linee guida per gli Stati membri e la Commissione. In particolare, è importante la tracciabilità dei prodotti in modo efficace ed efficiente lungo la supply chain come chiave per migliorare la sicurezza e la qualità dei prodotti in conformità con la normativa UE e la protezione dei consumatori dell'UE.Su questo tema infatti, cuore delle nostre proposte, era stato presentato un emendamento (qui ripreso in parte) riferito all'annoso tema del MADE IN che sottolineava come la mancanza di regole obbligatorie e quindi di un'etichettatura sull'origine dei prodotti e dei loro principali componenti, crei incertezza nei consumatori e che un sistema di tracciabilità obbligatoria garantirebbe una maggiore sicurezza e protezione dei consumatori UE.Pur essendo ancora distanti dagli obiettivi prefissati, ho votato favorevolmente al testo, perché rappresenta un buon compromesso e un buon primo passo nella giusta direzione.
The application of Union tariff rate quotas and other import quotas (A9-0216/2020 - Christophe Hansen)
Si tratta di una proposta tecnica che mira a colmare una lacuna dovuta all'uscita del Regno Unito dall'UE. Infatti, il seguente regolamento prevede che i contingenti tariffari di importazione dell'UE debbano essere disponibili solo per merci importate ed emesse in libera pratica nell'UE, escludendo quindi il territorio dell'Irlanda del Nord.Essendo una proposta volta ad evitare i rischi di malfunzionamento del mercato unico, ho espresso voto positivo.
Escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks (B9-0355/2020)
Il testo condanna le attività illegali della Turchia a Varosia e deplora le dichiarazioni del Presidente della Turchia Erdogan durante la sua visita a Varosia dello scorso 15 novembre.Si invita la Turchia ad astenersi dal procedere con attività unilaterali, come le perforazioni esplorative illegali, che violano ulteriormente la sovranità e i diritti sovrani della Repubblica di Cipro, ed invita il Consiglio europeo a mantenere la sua posizione nei confronti delle azioni unilaterali e illegali della Turchia, considerando la possibilità di imporre sanzioni mirate.Si sollecita inoltre il governo della Turchia ad evitare qualsiasi azione unilaterale che potrebbe sollevare ulteriori tensioni sull'isola e si chiede che la Turchia ritiri le sue truppe da Cipro, restituendo la zona di Varosia ai suoi legittimi abitanti sotto l'amministrazione temporanea delle Nazioni Unite.Ho espresso voto favorevole alla risoluzione congiunta per ribadire la nostra posizione netta sul tema e condannare la pericolosità del regime di Erdogan.
Elimination of customs duties on certain products (A9-0217/2020 - Bernd Lange)
Il mini-accordo della durata di 5 anni prevede la soppressione dei dazi doganali da parte europea per le aragoste americane (specie diverse da quelle europee) e la riduzione da parte americana dei dazi doganali per alcuni prodotti europei (accendini, alcuni oggetti in cristallo, piatti preparati, ecc.), rispettando il principio della nazione più favorita. Tale accordo può essere sospeso dalla Commissione nel caso in cui gli USA non riducano effettivamente i dazi doganali sui prodotti europei previsti dall'accordo o introducano nuove misure contro l'UE. L'obiettivo dell'accordo, che ha un valore economico limitato, è quello di incentivare una riduzione delle tensioni commerciali, considerando che gli USA sono un partner fondamentale per l'UE e i suoi Stati membri.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Union General Export Authorisation for the export of certain dual-use items from the Union to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C9-0345/2020 - Bernd Lange)
Il presente regolamento prevede l'inserimento del Regno Unito nella lista dei Paesi che fanno parte dell'"Autorizzazione generale di esportazione dell'UE" per l'esportazione di prodotti a duplice uso a basso rischio. L'urgenza di tale misura si deve all'imminenza dell'uscita del Regno Unito dall'UE.Pertanto l'aggiunta del Regno Unito all'elenco dei Paesi per i quali è prevista l'autorizzazione non inciderà negativamente sulla sicurezza dell'UE e internazionale, garantendo nel contempo un'applicazione uniforme e coerente dei controlli in tutta l'UE e condizioni di parità per gli esportatori dell'UE.Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU Trade Policy Review (B9-0370/2020)
La revisione della politica commerciale europea si pone l'obiettivo di aumentare la competitività degli operatori europei (compreso il settore agricolo) valutando il concetto di "autonomia strategica aperta" e cercando di aumentare la resilienza europea attraverso l'aumento delle capacità produttive all'interno dell'Unione, prendendo anche in considerazione la rilocalizzazione (reshoring) oltre alla localizzazione alle frontiere.Ribadisce inoltre l'impegno dell'UE verso un sistema commerciale aperto, multilaterale e basato su regole con al centro l'OMC riformata e ribadisce l'importanza di fare un accordo sull'e-commerce che possa agevolare le PMI.Dal momento che il testo include alcuni temi che ritengo particolarmente importanti, ho espresso voto positivo.
European Citizens' Initiative - Minority Safepack (B9-0403/2020, B9-0405/2020)
"Minority SafePack" il pacchetto legislativo per le minoranze è un'iniziativa dei cittadini europei, che chiede all'UE, di assumere iniziative legislative volte alla tutela e alla promozione delle minoranze nazionali o linguistiche, presenti nell'Unione. Si articola in nove proposte tra cui: raccomandazione UE per la tutela e la promozione della diversità culturale e linguistica; programmi di finanziamento per le piccole comunità linguistiche; la creazione di un Centro per la Diversità Linguistica; gli obiettivi dei fondi UE per lo sviluppo regionale includano la tutela delle minoranze nazionali e la promozione della diversità culturale e linguistica; ricerca sul valore aggiunto apportato dalle minoranze alle nostre società e all'Europa; rendere le minoranze senza Stato (esempio Rom) più prossime all'eguaglianza; una legge unica europea sul diritto d'autore, al fine di poter godere dei servizi e delle trasmissioni nella propria madrelingua; libertà di servizio e ricezione di contenuti audiovisivi nelle regioni delle minoranze; esenzione per categoria del sostegno finanziario regionale (statale) per la cultura delle minoranze, i loro media e la conservazione del loro patrimonio culturale.Tra gli sponsor dell'iniziativa, citiamo l'Unione Federalista delle Comunità etniche europee, la Regione Autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige e la Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience (B9-0400/2020)
La risoluzione - che accompagna l'interrogazione orale alla Commissione e al Consiglio UE - sottolinea il ruolo fondamentale dell'istruzione e della formazione professionale (IFP), in un mercato del lavoro in costante cambiamento. L'IFP è importante, infatti, per colmare le carenze di competenze nel mercato del lavoro dell'UE, per fornire ai giovani studenti le competenze necessarie per entrare nel mondo del lavoro e per migliorare e riqualificare i lavoratori, in modo da allineare le loro competenze alle esigenze dei datori di lavoro. Un sistema, quello basato sulla pratica e l'apprendimento sul campo, che può offrire conoscenze, abilità e competenze pertinenti e di alta qualità, a tutti i livelli in aziende di tutte le dimensioni e settori, in particolare nelle PMI.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Implementation of the EU water legislation (B9-0401/2020)
La presente proposta rileva la necessità di migliorare e accelerale l'attuazione della direttiva quadro sulle acque, mediante il coinvolgimento delle autorità competenti degli Stati membri e l'ulteriore integrazione degli obiettivi della direttiva quadro, sulle acque nelle politiche settoriali, in particolare nei comparti dell'agricoltura, dei trasporti e dell'energia, onde garantire che tutti i corpi idrici superficiali e sotterranei, siano in buono stato.Si invita la Commissione ad agire contro le violazioni degli Stati membri, al fine di garantire che tutti loro si conformino quanto prima. Si ritiene inoltre, che vi sia un'urgente necessità di miglioramento nell'ambito delle sostanze chimiche: la Commissione ha riscontrato differenze inattese tra gli Stati membri, soprattutto per quanto riguarda le modalità di aggiornamento dell'elenco delle sostanze prioritarie e il modo in cui si tiene conto degli effetti combinati delle miscele. Da tener presente che le sostanze pertinenti per la produzione di acqua potabile, dovrebbero essere aggiunte all'elenco delle sostanze prioritarie.Si invita la Commissione ad aggiornare e completare l'elenco delle sostanze pertinenti, al fine di permettere il conseguimento degli obiettivi della direttiva quadro sulle acque e migliorare la protezione delle risorse di acqua potabile.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Amendments to the Rules of Procedure in order to ensure the functioning of Parliament in extraordinary circumstances (A9-0194/2020 - Gabriele Bischoff)
Il testo inserisce un nuovo set di norme nel regolamento riferite alle situazioni in cui il Parlamento europeo, a causa di circostanze eccezionali e imprevedibili, che sfuggono al suo controllo, è ostacolato nello svolgimento delle sue funzioni e nell'esercizio delle sue prerogative quali previste dai trattati, determinando una deroga temporanea alle procedure abituali, nell'esigenza di predisporre misure eccezionali che gli consentano di continuare a svolgere le sue funzioni. Tra le altre modifiche sono da segnalare quelle riferite alla partecipazione a distanza dei deputati.Il Presidente determina altresì, nella sua decisione, in che modo i diritti e le prassi che non possono essere esercitati in modo appropriato senza la presenza fisica dei deputati sono adattati per la durata del regime. Pur certamente perfettibile, anche alla luce dell'esperienza operativa maturata in questi mesi, la relazione ha il merito di regolamentare un regime eccezionale dato dall'emergenza COVID-19 che, fino ad ora, era stato deliberato attraverso provvedimenti estemporanei della Presidenza e degli organi amministrativi del PE. Chiaramente, questo offre un elemento di tutela all'amministrazione del PE ma, allo stesso tempo, rappresenta un doveroso elemento di chiarezza nei confronti dei deputati per il corretto svolgimento del loro mandato.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Certain aspects of railway safety and connectivity with regard to the Channel Tunnel (C9-0379/2020)
Questa proposta relativa alla Brexit, mira a estendere la validità dei certificati di sicurezza ferroviaria e interoperabilità all'interno dell'Eurotunnel, in seguito al recesso del Regno Unito dall'Unione europea. Il Parlamento ha già votato in favore della proposta di decisione per autorizzare la Francia a negoziare e concludere un accordo internazionale con il Regno Unito, al fine di mantenere la commissione intergovernativa, come unica autorità nazionale di sicurezza per l'Eurotunnel. Tuttavia, la stipula dell'accordo è ancora in corso e non si riuscirà a concluderlo prima del 31 dicembre 2020. Al fine di garantire il prosieguo dell'operatività dell'Eurotunnel e di evitare interruzioni dei servizi di transito, si propone di concedere una proroga di due mesi per la certificazione di sicurezza del gestore dell'infrastruttura e di 9 mesi per gli operatori.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Achieving an effective policy legacy for the European Year of Cultural Heritage (A9-0210/2020 - Dace Melbārde)
Condivido la posizione della relatrice nel ritenere che il nostro patrimonio culturale europeo, sia una risorsa di inestimabile valore, sottolineando che le lingue favoriscono e promuovono la ricchezza e la diversità del patrimonio culturale europeo, dal momento che le madrelingue sono vettori di valori e conoscenze e servono spesso a trasmettere il patrimonio culturale immateriale. La relatrice, inoltre, esprime preoccupazione per le minacce derivanti dal terrorismo e condanna fermamente la distruzione dei siti del patrimonio culturale sia in Europa che altrove.Concludendo, la relazione esorta la Commissione a basarsi sul quadro d'azione europeo del patrimonio culturale, migliorando la cooperazione tra i diversi settori di intervento riferiti al patrimonio culturale. Consolidando gli sforzi attuali, in un coordinamento più deciso tra tutti gli attori dell'Unione europea, a tutti i livelli, ci si potrà trovare in una posizione migliore per il futuro e per la tutela del patrimonio culturale europeo, anche fuori dai confini europei.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law (A9-0001/2021 - Gilles Lebreton)
La relazione d'iniziativa di Lebreton (ID) punta ad esaminare in che misura le norme del diritto internazionale pubblico e privato e del diritto dell'UE, siano adeguate rispetto agli impieghi civili e militari di tecnologie di IA, robotica e tecnologie correlate, nonché mettere in risalto sfide e rischi che queste tecnologie pongono.Tra le altre, quindi, la relazione stabilisce la definizione di "Intelligenza artificiale (IA)" che ancora non esiste a livello UE; ribadisce che l'IA utilizzata in un contesto militare e civile debba essere soggetta ad un significativo controllo umano; sottolinea che l'Unione europea deve impegnarsi per conseguire la resilienza strategica, in modo da non trovarsi mai più impreparata dinanzi a una crisi ed evidenzia che tale aspetton assume un'importanza cruciale, in particolar modo per l'intelligenza artificiale e le sue applicazioni militari e invita la Commissione a valutare le conseguenze di una moratoria, sull'utilizzo dei sistemi di riconoscimento facciale e in funzione dell'esito di tale valutazione, a prendere in considerazione l'introduzione di una moratoria sull'utilizzo di tali sistemi da parte delle autorità dello Stato nei luoghi pubblici.Tenendo conto della posizione della nostra delegazione nelle quattro commissioni che hanno prodotto i pareri alla presente relazione, ho espresso voto positivo.
Revision of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) guidelines (A9-0251/2020 - Jens Gieseke)
La risoluzione sulla revisione delle linee guida delle reti TEN-T, definisce la posizione e gli orientamenti del Parlamento in vista della pubblicazione del relativo atto legislativo da parte della Commissione. Essa riconosce l'importanza strategica che le reti TEN-T rivestono per l'Europa, per il suo mercato interno e per la competitività dei suoi servizi logistici e industriali su scala globale. La revisione delle TEN-T è necessaria perché col passare del tempo, lo stesso sviluppo della rete, assieme all'evoluzione delle condizioni geopolitiche e macroeconomiche, ha posto ai legislatori, spunti di riflessione importanti per una migliore efficienza dei progetti.Ho votato a favore della proposta che riconosce l'importanza di investire nelle infrastrutture e che recepisce molti nostri emendamenti.
The arrest of Aleksei Navalny (B9-0090/2021, B9-0091/2021, B9-0092/2021, B9-0093/2021, B9-0094/2021, B9-0095/2021)
Il 17 gennaio 2021 Alexei Navalny è stato arrestato presso l'aeroporto internazionale Sheremetyevo, al suo ritorno in patria dalle cure mediche in Germania, a seguito del suo avvelenamento della scorsa estate in Russia. È stato condannato al carcere, in attesa di processo, durante una procedura di udienza svolta presso una stazione di polizia, senza la presenza del suo legale. La risoluzione chiede il rilascio immediato e incondizionato di Alexei Navalny e di tutte le altre persone detenute, condanna l'attentato alla vita di Navalny ed esprime la sua massima preoccupazione per la riduzione dello spazio per l'opposizione politica, le voci dissidenti e la società civile nella Federazione russa.Si condannano nei termini più severi le azioni della Federazione Russa, ritenute inopportune per uno Stato membro del Consiglio d'Europa e dell'OSCE, che si è impegnato a rispettare le libertà fondamentali, i diritti umani e lo stato di diritto, sanciti dalla Convenzione sui diritti umani e dal Patto internazionale sui diritti civili e politici. Si sottolinea la determinazione a monitorare da vicino l'evoluzione della situazione riguardante Alexei Navalny e il suo benessere, sia fisico che mentale. Si chiede anche agli Stati membri dell'UE di stabilire un approccio comune.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The latest developments in the National Assembly of Venezuela (RC-B9-0056/2021, B9-0056/2021, B9-0060/2021, B9-0062/2021, B9-0064/2021, B9-0065/2021)
Il testo riassume quanto accaduto in Venezuela e considera che il 6 dicembre 2020, si sono svolte in Venezuela elezioni parlamentari illegali e illegittime, svolte senza rispettare gli standard internazionali minimi per un processo credibile e non hanno rispettato il pluralismo politico, la democrazia, la trasparenza e lo stato di diritto. Non riconosce la legittimità o la legalità dell'Assemblea nazionale fraudolenta, istituita il 5 gennaio 2021 sulla base di queste elezioni non democratiche. Al contrario si riafferma che, finché in Venezuela non si terranno elezioni veramente libere, credibili, inclusive, trasparenti e pienamente democratiche, si continuerà a considerare come unico organo politico rappresentativo e democratico legittimo, l'Assemblea nazionale eletta nel dicembre 2015, il suo Presidente Guaidó e la sua Commissione delegata. Si esprime solidarietà e sostegno al popolo del Venezuela che soffre gli effetti di una grave crisi umanitaria e politica, attualmente aggravata dalla pandemia COVID19; chiede inoltre il rilascio incondizionato e immediato degli oltre 350 prigionieri politici e ribadisce l'obbligo di garantire pienamente il rispetto e la protezione dei diritti umani. Infine condanna la più recente repressione della libertà di espressione perpetrata dal regime di Maduro.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Reforming the EU list of tax havens (B9-0052/2021)
Si tratta di una risoluzione presentata a seguito dell'interrogazione con richiesta di risposta orale, discussa in seno alla sottocommissione FISC, circa le giurisdizioni non cooperanti e i paradisi fiscali.Nello specifico la risoluzione riguarda la riforma e l'implementazione della lista europea dei paradisi fiscali. Essa, attualmente, sembrerebbe coprire meno del 2% delle perdite di gettito fiscale mondiale, rendendo lo strumento confuso e inefficace. Se ne chiede dunque un rafforzamento, attraverso una maggiore trasparenza, coerenza, criteri di elencazione più severi e imparziali e misure difensive più forti contro l'elusione fiscale. Tranne il passaggio critico in cui si richiede l'introduzione di un'aliquota fiscale minima effettiva a livello di UE, la relazione non presenta aspetti negativi.Ho espresso quindi voto positivo.
Public access to documents for the years 2016-2018 (A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan)
La risoluzione presenta una valutazione del grado di trasparenza dei processi decisionali, delle Istituzioni europee per gli anni dal 2016 al 2018. Il testo osserva che un elevato grado di trasparenza ed accesso pubblico ai documenti potrebbe avvicinare i cittadini al lavoro quotidiano delle Istituzioni europee, spesso percepite distanti e lontane dai bisogni della popolazione degli Stati membri.Il testo invita la Commissione ad incrementare il livello di trasparenza in merito alla gestione dei fondi europei ed in particolare circa i contratti d'acquisto, spesso secretati, in assenza di motivazioni sufficienti.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Slot utilisation rules at Union airports: temporary relief (C9-0420/2020)
A causa del calo della domanda di passeggeri causato dalla pandemia COVID-19, i vettori aerei hanno apportato importanti modifiche alla pianificazione delle loro tratte dal 1° marzo 2020, con un tasso di utilizzo delle bande orarie negli aeroport,i molto al di sotto della soglia imposta dal regolamento sugli slot. La proposta mira a concedere una nuova deroga temporanea dai requisiti di utilizzo delle bande orarie per la stagione estiva 2021. La Commissione propone un percorso graduale per tornare a una normale applicazione della regola "usalo o perdilo", ripartendo da una ripartizione 30%/70%. La proposta prevede un termine entro il quale i vettori aerei debbano restituire le bande orarie indesiderate e chiarisce in quali circostanze, si possano ritirare. La Commissione potrebbe adottare atti delegati per un altro anno dall'entrata in vigore del regolamento per ridefinire tale ripartizione qualora la pandemia COVID-19 non venisse risolta e continuasse ad avere un impatto negativo sul settore del trasporto aereo.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Temporary measures concerning the validity of certificates and licences (Omnibus II) (C9-0004/2021)
La modifica di regolamento propone di autorizzare, eccezionalmente nel contesto dell'attuale pandemia COVID-19, l'estensione della validità di certificati, licenze o autorizzazioni in alcuni settori della legislazione sui trasporti (stradale, ferroviario, vie navigabili interne e sicurezza marittima). A causa della crisi COVID-19, il regolamento (UE) 2020/698 ha esteso per un periodo di 6 mesi (o 7 mesi in alcuni casi) il periodo di validità di alcuni certificati, licenze e autorizzazioni e ha rinviato il completamento di alcuni controlli periodici, controlli oltre che di formazione continua, che avrebbero dovuto svolgersi nel periodo compreso tra il 1° marzo 2020 e il 31 agosto 2020. Alcuni Stati membri hanno presentato richieste di prorogare nuovamente determinati periodi, approvate dalla Commissione. Nel persistere delle restrizioni, gli operatori dei trasporti potrebbero non essere in grado di espletare le formalità o le procedure necessarie per conformarsi a determinate disposizioni sul rinnovo o l'estensione di tali certificati, licenze o approvazioni.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Safety of the nuclear power plant in Ostrovets (Belarus) (B9-0109/2021)
Questa risoluzione descrive la preoccupazione per l'attivazione di una centrale nucleare ad Ostrovets, in Bielorussia, vicino al confine con tre Paesi dell'UE (Lituania, Estonia e Polonia). L'Unione europea ha chiesto collaborazione con le autorità bielorusse ed era già stata fatta una visita preliminare nel 2018, da parte di ENSREG (Gruppo degli organismi regolatori europei nel campo della sicurezza nucleare) che poi aveva rilasciato indicazioni di sicurezza da rispettare, per poter permettere una reale collaborazione. Da quel momento i rapporti fra le parti si sono raffreddati, non vi è stata evidenza dell'implementazione delle indicazioni, né è stato permesso ai controllori di ENSREG di tornare, per aggiornare la valutazione.La nostra delegazione, pur essendo sempre attenta, quando vi sono possibili ingerenze rispetto Paesi terzi, ritiene che salute e sicurezza dei cittadini vengano prima di tutto: quindi è bene che vengano preservati i cittadini europei che vivono nelle vicinanze dell'impianto. Inoltre anche la sicurezza della fornitura di energia dalla Bielorussia, oltre a non provenire da impianti certificati a norma, quindi essendo ad oggi vietata, non può essere considerata stabile.Ho espresso voto positivo alla risoluzione.
The situation in Myanmar (B9-0116/2021)
La risoluzione sulla situazione in Myanmar condanna fermamente il colpo di Stato militare dello scorso 1° febbraio e chiede il rilascio immediato e incondizionato, del Presidente Win Myint, della Consigliera di Stato Aung San Suu Kyi e di tutte le altre persone che sono state illegalmente arrestate con il pretesto di false elezioni, di risultati elettorali fraudolenti o sulla base di altre accuse infondate. Si chiede di rispettare l'esito delle elezioni democratiche del novembre 2020 e di reintrodurre immediatamente il governo civile.Il testo esorta l'esercito e il governo democraticamente eletto, ad avviare un processo libero ed equo di elaborazione e attuazione di una nuova Costituzione ,insieme al popolo del Myanmar, per realizzare una vera democrazia e uno Stato che operi per il benessere e la prosperità di tutti i suoi cittadini, garantendo in particolare, il riconoscimento e la rappresentanza di tutti i gruppi etnici nel Myanmar. Si criticano fortemente la restrizione dei diritti civili e umani nonché le restrizioni alla libertà di espressione e di riunione e in tale contesto, si condanna fermamente anche la limitazione della libertà dei media attraverso la chiusura di internet e la limitazione e il blocco delle piattaforme dei media sociali quali Facebook e Twitter.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Equal treatment in employment and occupation in light of the UNCRPD (A9-0014/2021 - Katrin Langensiepen)
La relazione di iniziativa analizza le disuguaglianze e le discriminazioni nei confronti delle persone con disabilità nel mercato del lavoro. Il tasso di disoccupazione delle persone con disabilità è quasi doppio rispetto a quello della popolazione in generale e la disoccupazione delle persone con disabilità, dura più a lungo di quella delle persone senza disabilità, indipendentemente dalle qualifiche.Supporto con decisione tutte le iniziative volte a migliorare la condizione dei disabili, a maggior ragione in questo periodo che abbiamo un ministro per la Disabilità.Per questo, ho espresso voto positivo.
Activities of the European Ombudsman - annual report 2019 (A9-0013/2021 - Sylvie Guillaume)
Il ruolo del Mediatore europeo consiste nel garantire il pieno rispetto dei diritti dei cittadini e nell'assicurare che il diritto a una buona amministrazione rispecchi le più elevate norme che le istituzioni, gli organi e gli organismi dell'Unione sono tenuti a rispettare, in qualsiasi circostanza. Il Mediatore svolge inoltre un ruolo fondamentale nell'aiutare le istituzioni europee a migliorare l'apertura, l'efficacia e la vicinanza rispetto ai cittadini, nell'ottica di rafforzare la fiducia di questi ultimi nei confronti dell'Unione, agevolando così la partecipazione della società civile.Nonostante alcuni emendamenti siano dichiaratamente rivolti ad estendere oltre misura, ruolo e ambito di applicazione del Mediatore europeo, la sua funzione, per quanto possa essere a volte solo nominale, rimane utile riferimento come stimolo ad una sempre maggiore attenzione necessaria alle regole di trasparenza e di buona condotta delle istituzioni europee.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The Syrian conflict - 10 years after the uprising (B9-0175/2021, B9-0176/2021, B9-0177/2021, B9-0178/2021, B9-0179/2021, B9-0180/2021, B9-0181/2021)
La lunga risoluzione sulla Siria, descrive la situazione nel Paese a 10 anni dalla rivolta del 2011, che ha di fatto dato origine a un decennio di guerra. Purtroppo la crisi siriana è caratterizzata da sofferenze e stati di necessità senza precedenti, con 7 milioni di rifugiati, oltre 13 milioni di persone, di cui 6 milioni sono donne e minori, che necessitano di assistenza umanitaria, e circa 6,8 milioni di sfollati interni; il conflitto ha provocato oltre 500 000 morti e più di un milione di feriti.Si esorta il regime siriano a rilasciare immediatamente i 130 000 prigionieri politici detenuti ingiustamente, tra cui donne, uomini e bambini, in molti casi fatti sparire dalla sicurezza siriana. Si condanna fermamente il ricorso sistematico alla tortura, ai trattamenti inumani, così come alle orribili condizioni in cui sono detenuti, senza alcun accesso a un tribunale civile, a un avvocato, a cure mediche o a poter incontrare le loro famiglie.Infine si chiede agli Stati membri di mantenere le sanzioni nei confronti degli esponenti del regime e delle entità ad esso collegate, colpevoli della repressione nel Paese, anche tramite il nuovo regime globale di sanzioni UE.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use (A9-0390/2017 - Markéta Gregorová)
Si tratta di una proposta tecnica che nasce dalla necessità di garantire un quadro giuridico aggiornato, in merito all'esportazione di prodotti a duplice uso, che sia coerente con le nuove sfide nel campo della difesa e della sicurezza. Al fine di garantire un maggiore controllo sull'esportazione di prodotti a duplice uso, in modo da aumentare anche la sicurezza dei cittadini europei, ho espresso voto positivo.
EU Strategy for Sustainable Tourism (A9-0033/2021 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
La presente relazione di iniziativa intende concentrarsi su quattro orientamenti, volti a rilanciare il settore con piani di risposta alla pandemia, riorientare la politica di governance nel quadro dell'Unione, rafforzare le iniziative del settore per un turismo sostenibile, responsabile e intelligente e pianificare il futuro del settore e i cambiamenti che avranno luogo. Il rapporto sottolinea che il sostegno finanziario a breve termine è essenziale per la sopravvivenza del settore, soprattutto alla luce della seconda e terza ondata pandemica e chiede di integrare l'industria del turismo, nei piani di sviluppo europei e nazionali. Sottolinea la necessità di sostenere le microimprese e le PMI, concentrandosi sulla liquidità, e di promuovere la sostenibilità, l'innovazione e la digitalizzazione.Ho espresso il voto positivo, per evidenziare l'importanza delle misure necessarie per la ripresa del settore, sebbene la relazione presenti alcuni aspetti con possibili criticità, tra cui il rafforzamento delle competenze europee in materia di turismo e la creazione di una nuova agenzia.
Commission evaluation report on the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation two years after its application (B9-0211/2021)
La risoluzione esprime la posizione del Parlamento europeo rispetto alla normativa GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) relativa alla protezione delle persone fisiche, con riguardo al trattamento e alla libera circolazione dei dati personali, a due anni dall'entrata in vigore.Il testo evidenzia sia benefici che lacune che si sono manifestate nell'attuazione della nuova normativa e formula raccomandazioni, rispetto alle misure da adottare in futuro. Tra i punti più apprezzabili, ci sono le disposizioni che sono state inserite a sostegno delle Piccole e Medie Imprese, per le quali il passaggio al nuovo regime di gestione dei dati, ha comportato costi ed oneri.Apprezzabile che il testo riconosca che la pandemia da COVID-19 ponga nuove sfide in termini di privacy, specialmente con riferimento alla confidenzialità dei dati sanitari dei pazienti e al ricorso ad applicazioni per il tracciamento dei contagi.Nonostante alcuni punti di criticità, dato che la normativa è risultata fino adesso adatta nel tutelare la privacy dei cittadini e dati i numerosi aspetti condivisibili presenti nel testo, ho espresso voto positivo.
2019-2020 Reports on Albania (A9-0041/2021 - Isabel Santos)
Si tratta della relazione di follow-up alle relazioni annuali (2019 e 2020) informative della Commissione europea, sull'Albania: a causa del cambio di mandato parlamentare e della Commissione europea, oltre ai vari ritardi dovuti alla pandemia, questo è il primo voto dell'attuale legislatura sui singoli Paesi dell'area balcanica. La relazione nel complesso è abbastanza bilanciata: fornisce varie raccomandazioni e analizza la situazione politica e la democrazia; lo stato di diritto; il rispetto dei diritti fondamentali e delle minoranze, della libertà religiosa; le riforme per il pluralismo dei media, contro la corruzione e la criminalità organizzata; il mercato del lavoro; ambiente, trasporti ed energia; la cooperazione regionale; l'allineamento con la politica estera e di sicurezza UE, con riferimenti anche alla NATO.Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU/Honduras Voluntary Partnership Agreement (A9-0053/2021 - Karin Karlsbro)
La relazione accoglie con favore l'accordo di volontariato di partenariato (AVP) tra l'Unione europea e la Repubblica di Honduras, che ha come obiettivo, quello di combattere il disboscamento illegale e assicurare che il legname importato in UE sia tagliato legalmente. Nella relazione si fa anche riferimento alla corruzione e alla violenza, diffuse nel Paese, oltre alla opaca tutela dei diritti fondamentali di proprietà fondiaria e delle comunità indigene: tale accordo potrebbe contribuire a generare cambiamenti positivi in Honduras cercando di migliorare la governance globale. Dal momento che questo accordo potrebbe avere un effetto positivo nel garantire un maggiore controllo delle importazioni di legname e dei suoi derivati nell'UE, ho espresso voto positivo.
Interinstitutional agreement on mandatory transparency register (A9-0123/2021 - Maria Hübner)
L'Accordo interistituzionale tra Parlamento, Consiglio e Commissione, su un nuovo Registro obbligatorio per la trasparenza, mira a regolare il dialogo delle istituzioni dell'UE con le associazioni rappresentative e la società civile, con l'obiettivo di garantire che la rappresentanza degli interessi sia vincolata da standard etici elevati e che i rappresentanti eletti, i commissari e i funzionari dell'Unione siano indipendenti, agiscano in trasparenza e siano responsabili.La relazione insiste particolarmente, sull'importanza del nuovo Registro, per coprire le attività rilevanti, comprese quelle di lobbying indirette, alla luce della comparsa, nel contesto della pandemia, di nuove forme di interazione dei rappresentanti di interessi con i decisori dell'UE. Apprezzando la maggior trasparenza nei processi decisionali dell'Unione europea, ho espresso voto positivo al nuovo Registro, il cui obiettivo è quello di rendere più trasparente il dialogo tra i rappresentanti e i membri delle tre istituzioni e i rappresentanti di interessi.
Multiannual management plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (A9-0149/2020 - Giuseppe Ferrandino)
Considerando l'impatto dell'epidemia di COVID-19 sulle attività di pesca, il testo consente agli Stati membri di prolungare la stagione di pesca fino a 10 giorni in caso di crisi di salute pubblica. Inoltre, la relazione sostiene l'assegnazione di una quota settoriale specifica per le piccole imbarcazioni autorizzate a pescare il tonno rosso, e tiene in particolare considerazione la pesca tradizionale e artigianale quando si distribuiscono le quote nazionali. Sono stati considerati anche alcuni dei nostri emendamenti, tra cui: in vari articoli sono state considerate le peculiarità e i bisogni della piccola pesca artigianale; è stato eliminato l'eccessivo ricorso agli atti delegati da parte della Commissione su elementi troppo dettagliati riguardanti le campagne di pesca; maggiore allocazione di quote per la piccola pesca artigianale, in particolare in tutti quegli Stati membri, come l'Italia, che fino ad ora hanno allocato meno del 20% delle quote nazionali a questo settore.Ho espresso quindi voto positivo.
Digital Green Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
La Commissione europea ha presentato lo scorso 17 marzo, la proposta di creare un Certificato verde digitale per "facilitare l'esercizio del diritto di libera circolazione nell'UE durante la pandemia di COVID-19". Va ribadito che la decisione di introdurre restrizioni alla libera circolazione resta comunque di competenza degli Stati membri. Alla proposta abbiamo presentato alcuni emendamenti significativi, tra cui Riferimento esplicito alla natura non discriminatoria dello strumento, sottolineando che, il possesso di un certificato EU COVID-19 digitale, non è una pre-condizione per l'esercizio dei diritti di libera circolazione. Definizione della durata dello strumento che viene fissata a 12 mesi e inclusione di un invito agli Stati membri di offrire tamponi gratuiti, al fine di garantire il diritto alla libera circolazione all'interno dell'UE senza discriminazioni.In conclusione, considerati i potenziali benefici che il certificato potrà generare in termini di armonizzazione delle disposizioni relative ai viaggi e di conseguenza, a favore della ripartenza economica, ho espresso voto positivo.
Digital taxation: OECD negotiations, tax residency of digital companies and a possible European Digital Tax (A9-0103/2021 - Andreas Schwab, Martin Hlaváček)
La relazione si prefigge lo scopo di trattare la complessa tematica della tassazione digitale di prossima introduzione a livello UE, come nuova risorsa propria, che dovrà finanziare il piano di NGUE. Lo scopo è quello di trovare una soluzione, al fine di superare la sotto-tassazione dell'economia digitalizzata, prendendo in considerazione la mobilità delle multinazionali altamente digitalizzate, in particolare per quanto riguarda la creazione di valore, e di garantire un'equa distribuzione dei diritti di tassazione, tra tutti i paesi in cui si svolge l'attività economica.La relazione fa riferimento al fatto che, alla luce della forte digitalizzazione dell'economia causata dalla pandemia, sia necessario rivedere i criteri tradizionali dei sistemi fiscali basati sulla presenza materiale delle attività, in modo da disegnare una nuova geografia della tassazione, che sia in grado di catturare anche le multinazionali. Questo non soltanto per combattere l'evasione e l'elusione fiscale, ma anche per una maggiore giustizia della fiscalità.Considerando che si ritiene necessario trovare soluzioni più eque, in modo da riuscire a tassare anche quelle imprese che generano enormi profitti, grazie alle nuove frontiere tecnologiche della nuova economia digitalizzata e dal momento che riconosce la sovranità fiscale come competenza degli Stati membri, ho espresso voto positivo.
Assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia and the rule of law in Malta (B9-0219/2021)
La risoluzione esprime la posizione del Parlamento europeo in merito alle indagini sull'assassinio della giornalista d'inchiesta maltese, Daphne Caruana Galizia e più in generale sullo stato di diritto a Malta. Caruana Galizia è stata una giornalista che ha denunciato la corruzione ai più alti livelli governativi maltesi e per questa sua attività investigativa è stata vittima di minacce, culminate nell'attacco terroristico mortale avvenuto il 16 ottobre 2017. A tal proposito, la risoluzione del Parlamento osserva, a giusto titolo, come le indagini abbiano dimostrato il coinvolgimento diretto di esponenti di spicco del governo laburista nell'assassinio. Apprezzabile inoltre che il testo riconosca le persistenti violazioni dello stato di diritto compiute dal governo, in particolare in termini di corruzione, collusione con organizzazioni criminali e intimidazioni nei confronti dei giornalisti.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Russia, the case of Alexei Navalny, military build-up on Ukraine's border and Russian attack in the Czech Republic (B9-0235/2021, RC-B9-0236/2021, B9-0236/2021, B9-0237/2021, B9-0250/2021, B9-0251/2021, B9-0252/2021)
La risoluzione sulla Russia si concentra in particolare sul caso di Alexei Navalny, sull'escalation militare ai confini con l'Ucraina e sull'attacco russo nella Repubblica Ceca. Si sostiene l'indipendenza, la sovranità e l'integrità territoriale dell'Ucraina entro i suoi confini internazionalmente riconosciuti e si ribadisce il fermo sostegno alla politica dell'UE, di non riconoscimento dell'annessione illegale della Repubblica autonoma di Crimea.Deplora lo stato attuale delle relazioni UE-Russia causato da diversi fattori, quali l'aggressione della Russia e la destabilizzazione dell'Ucraina, comportamenti ostili e attacchi diretti contro gli Stati membri dell'UE. Condanna fermamente il comportamento ostile della Russia in Europa e invita il suo governo a porre fine a queste attività che violano i principi e le norme internazionali. Si chiede il rilascio immediato e incondizionato di Alexei Navalny, la cui condanna è politicamente motivata e di tutte le persone detenute durante le proteste a sostegno del suo rilascio o della sua campagna contro la corruzione; sottolinea che tutte le persone coinvolte nell'azione penale, nella condanna e nel maltrattamento di Alexei Navalny dovrebbero essere soggette a sanzioni derivanti dal regime globale di sanzioni sui diritti umani dell'UE.Ho espresso voto positivo.
5th anniversary of the Peace Agreement in Colombia (RC-B9-0227/2021, B9-0227/2021, B9-0228/2021, B9-0229/2021, B9-0230/2021, B9-0231/2021, B9-0232/2021)
Con la risoluzione sul quinto anniversario dell'accordo di pace in Colombia, si ribadisce il sostegno all'accordo di pace in Colombia, si esprime solidarietà a tutte le vittime e si accoglie con favore il recente dialogo che ha avuto luogo tra le parti. Si ricorda la disponibilità europea a continuare a fornire tutta l'assistenza politica e finanziaria possibile per sostenere l'attuazione globale dell'accordo di pace, per accompagnare la fase postbellica, in cui la partecipazione delle comunità locali e delle organizzazioni della società civile, continua a essere essenziale, tenendo anche in considerazione le priorità espresse dalle vittime in termini di verità, giustizia, risarcimenti e garanzie di non ripetizione.Il testo condanna le uccisioni e le violenze contro difensori dei diritti umani, ex combattenti delle FARC e leader sociali e indigeni; sottolinea che affrontare la violenza persistente contro di loro è una delle principali sfide in Colombia. Si riconoscono gli sforzi compiuti dalle istituzioni colombiane e le incoraggia a compiere ulteriori progressi, nell'assicurare che i diritti umani siano pienamente e permanentemente sostenuti, in linea con il suo dovere di garantire la sicurezza dei suoi cittadini.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The accessibility and affordability of Covid-testing (B9-0233/2021, B9-0234/2021)
La risoluzione esprime la posizione del Parlamento europeo rispetto alla crescente necessità, di assicurare l'accesso a prezzi contenuti dei test COVID ai cittadini europei. Il testo osserva che la capacità di svolgere tamponi su larga scala, sarà fondamentale per contenere l'emergenza di nuovi focolai, allorché la campagna di vaccinazione procede a rilento in diversi Stati membri. Si condivide l'invito agli Stati membri a fornire accesso gratuito ai tamponi, a tutti i cittadini, ed in particolare ai lavoratori in settori essenziali. Altresì sostenibile, l'appello agli Stati membri e alla Commissione, ad introdurre un tetto al costo dei tamponi. Nonostante rimangano alcuni aspetti problematici nel testo, le nostre proposte sono in larga parte state prese in considerazione durante i negoziati.Condividendo l'idea di fondo di offrire test gratuitamente ai cittadini europei, ho espresso voto positivo.
EU-India relations (A9-0124/2021 - Alviina Alametsä)
Il testo contiene le raccomandazioni del Parlamento europeo, in vista del vertice tra i leader di UE e India, che si terrà a inizio maggio e che sembra andare nella giusta direzione, invitando a proseguire il miglioramento e l'approfondimento delle relazioni fra l'UE e l'India come partner strategici e mantenere l'impegno a svolgere dialoghi multilivello regolari. Il testo contiene: relazioni generali UE-India; cooperazione in materia di politica estera e di sicurezza; promozione dello stato di diritto, dei diritti umani e della buona governance; commercio all'insegna della sostenibilità e della prosperità; resilienza attraverso partenariati settoriali.Si sottolineano i benefici in termini di sicurezza condivisa, della stabilità e dello sviluppo pacifico, che un maggior impegno fra l'UE e l'India, nell'ambito della sicurezza e della difesa porterebbero alla regione indo-pacifica, tenendo anche conto del deteriorarsi delle relazioni tra India e Cina, per le quali si auspica possa esserci una soluzione pacifica.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)
Secondo la proposta, il Fondo dovrebbe sostenere investimenti quali le tecnologie energetiche pulite, l'economia circolare, la riduzione delle emissioni, la riqualificazione dei siti, la riqualificazione dei lavoratori e l'assistenza tecnica.La quota del QFP dovrebbe essere integrata da trasferimenti obbligatori dal Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale e dal Fondo sociale europeo Plus (tra 1,5 e 3 volte l'importo del Fondo), nonché da cofinanziamenti nazionali in linea con le norme della politica di coesione.Al fine di accedere ai finanziamenti, gli Stati membri, insieme agli enti locali e regionali e ai partner pertinenti, preparerebbero piani territoriali per una transizione giusta nell'ambito dei loro programmi della politica di coesione. Tali piani delineerebbero le tappe fondamentali per conseguire la neutralità climatica e i dettagli del sostegno ai territori in transizione giusta, compresa la complementarità con altri fondi e altri pilastri nell'ambito del meccanismo per una transizione giusta.Nonostante alcune criticità, ho espresso voto positivo.
Review of the European Union Solidarity Fund (A9-0052/2021 - Younous Omarjee)
L'obiettivo del Fondo di solidarietà dell'Unione europea è quello di fornire assistenza finanziaria agli Stati membri colpiti da disastri naturali, come alluvioni, incendi forestali, terremoti, tempeste e siccità. Il FSUE fornisce un sostegno finanziario a lungo termine agli Stati membri colpiti da calamità naturali e reca sollievo ai cittadini e alle regioni che ne subiscono le conseguenze.La Commissione europea presenta ogni anno al Parlamento e al Consiglio una relazione sull'attività del Fondo nell'anno precedente. L'Italia è il maggior beneficiario del Fondo, considerando che il sostegno complessivo erogato dalla creazione del Fondo stesso raggiunge il totale di 5,2 miliardi di euro.Nel marzo 2020, a fronte della diffusione dell'epidemia di COVID-19, la Commissione ha proposto un ampliamento del campo di applicazione del Fondo alle gravi emergenze di sanità pubblica. Tale proposta, è stata approvata: non solo è stato ampliato il campo di applicazione del regolamento del 2002 alle gravi emergenze sanitarie, ma si è anche preso atto dell'insufficienza e dell'inadeguatezza del livello degli anticipi, che è stato pertanto portato dal 10% al 25% del contributo stimato del Fondo, con un importo massimo che è ora pari a 100 milioni di euro.Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU/Cuba Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0129/2021 - Gabriel Mato)
Nel 2018 l'Unione europea ha avviato negoziati con alcuni membri dell'Organizzazione mondiale del commercio (OMC) ai sensi delle regole del GATT con l'obiettivo di "ripartire" i 143 contingenti tariffari dell'UE-28 tra l'UE-27 e il Regno Unito a seguito dell'uscita di quest'ultimo dall'UE seguendo il cosiddetto "approccio comune". Nel fare ciò, si è tenuto conto principalmente dei flussi commerciali verso l'UE-27 e il Regno Unito durante il periodo dal 2013 al 2015. Con la Repubblica di Cuba, con la quale l'UE ha firmato a dicembre 2016 un accordo di dialogo politico e cooperazione che è entrato in vigore in buona parte in maniera provvisoria da novembre 2017, la Commissione ha concluso i negoziati sui contingenti tariffari in questione con un accordo in forma di scambio di lettere a Ginevra il 3 luglio 2020.L'adattamento dei contingenti tariffari con la Repubblica di Cuba non risulta essere problematico, poiché non prevede aumenti dei contingenti che possono impattare negativamente il commercio europeo e in particolare quello italiano. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Agreement EU/USA/Iceland/Norway: Time Limitations on Arrangements for the Provision of Aircraft with Crew (A9-0125/2021 - Maria Grapini)
La Commissione ha raggiunto un accordo con gli Stati Uniti sulla fornitura di aeromobili con equipaggio (wet lease ), per il quale il Consiglio chiede l'approvazione del Parlamento europeo a norma dell'articolo 218 del TFUE. La modifica del precedente accordo del 2007 si rende necessaria in quanto l'Unione ha rivisto intanto le norme relative al wet lease nell'ambito del mercato interno dell'aviazione dell'UE approvando un regolamento che introduce un limite temporale per il noleggio di aeromobili immatricolati in paesi terzi. Tale disposizione non figurava nel regolamento precedente al momento della firma dell'ATA tra UE e Stati Uniti.L'accordo chiarisce che le parti non possono imporre limite temporali ad alcun accordo di wet lease , che deve intendersi come qualsiasi accordo tra due compagnie aeree per la fornitura di aeromobili con equipaggio destinati al trasporto internazionale. Eventuali controversie vengono risolte con i meccanismi di risoluzioni previste dall'accordo.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Dock dues scheme in the French outermost regions (A9-0138/2021 - Younous Omarjee)
L'imposta detta "dazi di mare" è un'imposta indiretta in vigore esclusivamente nelle regioni ultraperiferiche (RUP) francesi della Martinica, della Guadalupa, della Guyana francese, della Riunione e di Mayotte. Questa imposta si applica alle importazioni di beni, a prescindere dalla loro provenienza, e alle forniture di beni a titolo oneroso da parte di soggetti che esercitano attività di produzione.La proposta in esame stabilisce il quadro giuridico per i "dazi di mare" oltre il 30 giugno 2021, prevedendo un nuovo regime di deroga per il periodo dal 1° gennaio 2022 al 31 dicembre 2027, con una revisione delle attuali disposizioni per rendere il regime più flessibile e trasparente. Allo stesso tempo, essa proroga di sei mesi, fino al 31 dicembre 2021, la decisione n. 940/2014/UE, per dare alla Francia il tempo di recepire nel proprio diritto nazionale il nuovo regime applicabile dal 1° gennaio 2022 al 31 dicembre 2027.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Common system of value added tax: exemptions on importations and on certain supplies, in respect of Union measures in the public interest (A9-0155/2021 - Irene Tinagli)
L'oggetto della votazione è la proposta di direttiva del Consiglio sul sistema comune d'imposta sul valore aggiunto (IVA), in particolare sulle esenzioni applicabili alle importazioni e a talune cessioni e prestazioni in relazione a misure dell'Unione di interesse pubblico. La proposta del Consiglio vuole modificare la direttiva per consentire alla Commissione e ad altre agenzie e organi dell'UE di importare e acquistare beni e servizi in esenzione IVA quando tali acquisti vengono distribuiti durante un intervento di emergenza nell'UE, ossia sono acquistati a livello dell'UE nell'interesse pubblico. I destinatari possono essere gli Stati membri o terzi, come le autorità o le istituzioni nazionali. Il campo di applicazione della presente proposta è ampio e copre tutti i tipi di beni e servizi.Inoltre, la proposta autorizza la Commissione a rendere elettronici i certificati di esenzione (sono i certificati che confermano che l'operazione può beneficiare dell'esenzione della direttiva IVA). La forma elettronica faciliterebbe, a detta della Commissione, la riduzione degli oneri amministrativi associati all'uso della versione cartacea del modulo, in particolare in situazioni di crisi come le pandemie.Nonostante alcune criticità, ho espresso voto positivo.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/002 EE/Tourism - Estonia (A9-0158/2021 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Si tratta della richiesta di mobilitazione del Fondo europeo di adeguamento alla globalizzazione da parte dell'Estonia per ottenere un contributo finanziario a seguito di 10 080 esuberi nel settore del turismo. Si tratta della prima richiesta volta a fornire assistenza alle persone interessate per il reinserimento nel mercato del lavoro a seguito della crisi economica dovuta alla pandemia. La Commissione ha concluso che le condizioni per la concessione di un contributo finanziario del FEG erano soddisfatte e ha adottato una proposta di decisione sulla mobilitazione del FEG a favore dell'Estonia per sostenere il reinserimento sul mercato del lavoro di 5 060 beneficiari.Si tratta della prima richiesta di mobilitazione del FEG connessa alla crisi economica dovuta alla pandemia di COVID-19, a seguito dell'inclusione, nella risoluzione del Parlamento europeo del giugno 2020, della possibilità di poter richiedere questi fondi anche per sostenere i lavoratori licenziati definitivamente e i lavoratori autonomi nel contesto della crisi pandemica.Dato che questa richiesta è strettamente legata alla crisi economica dovuta alla pandemia di COVID-19 che ha colpito in modo particolarmente duro il settore del turismo, a supporto del quale saranno destinati questi fondi, ho espresso voto positivo.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency (A9-0157/2021 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
La proposta prevede di mobilitare il Fondo di solidarietà dell'Unione europea per fornire assistenza finanziaria per un importo complessivo di 484 milioni di euro in relazione alle catastrofi naturali che hanno colpito la Grecia e la Francia, nonché in relazione all'emergenza sanitaria pubblica causata dalla diffusione della pandemia per 17 Stati membri (Austria, Belgio, Cechia, Croazia, Estonia, Francia, Germania, Grecia, Irlanda, Italia, Lettonia, Lituania, Lussemburgo, Portogallo, Romania, Spagna e Ungheria) e 3 paesi candidati (Albania, Montenegro e Serbia).Per questa mobilitazione è stata richiesta una doppia operazione di bilancio, ovvero il riporto di 48 milioni di euro dalla dotazione del 2020 rimasta inutilizzata, incluso nel progetto di bilancio rettificativo n. 2/2021, e lo storno di 428 milioni di euro dalla linea della riserva di solidarietà e per gli aiuti d'urgenza (SEAR) alla linea di bilancio operativa del FSUE approvato dalla commissione BUDG il 10 maggio.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Draft amending budget No 2/2021: financing the COVID-19 response and including refinements and updates related to the final adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (A9-0160/2021 - Pierre Larrouturou)
Il progetto di bilancio rettificativo (DAB) n. 2/2021 vuole mettere a disposizione circa 261 milioni di euro in stanziamenti d'impegno e 253 milioni di euro in stanziamenti di pagamento per duplici scopi: da un lato, fornire finanziamenti supplementari per la prevenzione, la preparazione e la risposta alla pandemia di COVID-19, dall'altro, introdurre modifiche tecniche derivanti dagli accordi politici sulle basi giuridiche settoriali in seguito dell'adozione del QFP (Quadro finanziario pluriennale) nel dicembre 2020, oltre ad alcuni adeguamenti relativi alla dotazione della garanzia per le azioni esterne.Inoltre, il rettificativo propone anche di riportare l'importo di 48 milioni di euro dalla dotazione non utilizzata del Fondo di solidarietà dell'UE (FSUE) per il 2020 direttamente alla linea di bilancio operativa del FSUE e di effettuare altri adeguamenti e aggiornamenti tecnici.Questo rettificativo mette a disposizione finanziamenti aggiuntivi per le misure da adottare nella risposta alla pandemia da COVID-19, ho espresso quindi voto positivo.
Challenges of sports events organisers in the digital environment (A9-0139/2021 - Angel Dzhambazki)
L'iniziativa ha l'obbiettivo di contrastare la pirateria e la trasmissione illegale degli eventi sportivi online. Questi non sono infatti soggetti alla protezione del diritto d'autore e non esistono diritti specifici o una tutela armonizzata a livello europeo per gli organizzatori di eventi sportivi. Per porre rimedio alle carenze del quadro giuridico vigente in materia, è pertanto stata fatta richiesta alla Commissione di presentare una proposta legislativa che eventualmente intervenga sulla direttiva sul commercio elettronico o che introduca disposizioni specifiche riguardanti i diritti degli organizzatori di eventi sportivi.Si chiede di provvedere a un'ulteriore armonizzazione delle procedure e dei rimedi nell'Unione atti a rafforzare e migliorare l'efficienza degli strumenti esecutivi.Si chiede, tra le altre, di modificare la direttiva sul rispetto dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale, per introdurre la possibilità per l'autorità amministrativa o giudiziaria competente di emanare ingiunzioni che impongano la disabilitazione in tempo reale dell'accesso ai contenuti illegali online relativi a eventi sportivi in diretta o la rimozione dei medesimi e chiarire che la responsabilità della trasmissione illegale di eventi sportivi non è imputabile a tifosi e consumatori.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A9-0102/2021 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
Questa procedura non legislativa ha lo scopo di emendare la decisione sul programma di ricerca del Fondo di ricerca per carbone e acciaio, per prevedere le linee guida tecniche per i prossimi anni.Il testo parla di ricerca sul carbone e di come si possa gestire la transizione nelle regioni dove ancora è forte la presenza delle miniere per minimizzare l'impatto durante il periodo in questione, sia da un punto di vista di mantenimento delle condizioni ambientali e di salute delle persone, sia per preservare i posti di lavoro del personale che ci lavora.In generale, il testo si presenta bilanciato e ha diversi aspetti positivi perché si parla di finanziare la ricerca per rendere la produzione dell'acciaio più moderna ed efficiente e allo stesso tempo rispettosa dell'ambiente. Per quanto riguarda il carbone, approvo la ricerca per rendere le condizioni di dismissione delle miniere il meno impattanti possibile per preservare il territorio in cui si trovano e i posti di lavoro ancora legati a questo settore.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (A9-0127/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)
La relazione sottolinea l'importanza strategica dell'intelligenza artificiale nel settore culturale e audiovisivo e sintetizza ottimamente la posizione dell'Unione europea in questo settore, anche alla luce della pandemia di COVID-19.La relazione di iniziativa analizza l'impatto dell'utilizzo dell'IA nei settori dell'istruzione, della cultura e dell'audiovisivo, i possibili effetti dei futuri progressi tecnologici dal punto di vista sociale e industriale e le sfide che le nuove tecnologie stanno imponendo dal punto di vista normativo.Come già assistito nelle altre relazioni che hanno affrontato il tema dell'uso delle tecnologie di IA, il Parlamento si avvicina al tema dell'IA e dell'istruzione con sufficiente prudenza. Nonostante alcune criticità, si trovano elementi positivi: la centralità dell'uomo come ultimo revisore dei sistemi di IA viene confermata ancora una volta, l'approccio rispetto al tema della tutela del patrimonio e della sua valorizzazione tramite tali sistemi è costruttivo e pragmatico e l'attenzione rivolta al multilinguismo e alla necessità di garantire il pluralismo dei media, passando per il focus sulla libertà di espressione, è chiara.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
2019-2020 Reports on Montenegro (A9-0131/2021 - Tonino Picula)
Il testo sul Montenegro, "relazione sulle relazioni 2019-2020 della Commissione concernenti il Montenegro", è nel complesso bilanciato e riprende la struttura di quelli votati di recente sugli altri paesi dei Balcani occidentali. Fornisce varie raccomandazioni e analizza nelle varie sezioni il percorso di adesione all'UE, la situazione politica e la democrazia, lo stato di diritto, il rispetto dei diritti fondamentali, le riforme per il pluralismo dei media contro la corruzione e il crimine, le minoranze, compresi rom ed egiziani, la violenza domestica, l'equilibrio di genere, le persone con disabilità, le persone LGBTI; la libertà religiosa, la cooperazione regionale e le relazioni di vicinato, la politica estera e di sicurezza (con riferimenti anche alla NATO, di cui il paese è membro), la cooperazione in materia di migrazione, criminalità transfrontaliera e contrabbando, il settore finanziario, di bilancio e di riforma fiscale, l'educazione e il mercato del lavoro, l'impatto del COVID-19 e l'assistenza UE nel contrasto al COVID-19.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Digital future of Europe: digital single market and use of AI for European consumers (A9-0149/2021 - Deirdre Clune)
La relazione sul futuro digitale dell'Europa si focalizza principalmente su due macro aree tematiche: le barriere esistenti, soprattutto per le PMI, che impediscono la realizzazione del mercato unico digitale, e il miglioramento dell'uso dell'intelligenza artificiale per i consumatori europei.Il testo affronta i diversi aspetti che impediscono alle PMI europee di competere ad armi pari sul mercato globale. Analizzando le criticità dello status quo, come, ad esempio, la mancanza di investimenti e finanziamenti cospicui che possano favorire la transizione digitale e la scarsa qualità e quantità dei data sets a disposizione delle imprese e necessari alla loro evoluzione digitale, la relazione suggerisce un approccio necessariamente più concreto, basato sulla certezza della legislazione per le imprese e i consumatori, sulla facilitazione all'utilizzo di venture e seed capital , sul supporto speciale da parte dei programmi europei rivolti alle imprese.Sul versante dell'IA, la relazione focalizza la propria attenzione sulle potenzialità ma anche sui rischi che comporta l'utilizzo di tali nuovi sistemi, specialmente in relazione ai consumatori.Ho espresso voto positivo.
ETIAS consequential amendments: ECRIS-TCN (A9-0083/2021 - Jeroen Lenaers)
Nel 2018, l'Unione europea ha definito l'istituzione del Sistema europeo di informazione e autorizzazione ai viaggi (ETIAS). Questa base dati, vagamente ispirata al sistema americano ESTA, si applicherà ai viaggiatori esenti dall'obbligo di visto al momento dell'attraversamento delle frontiere esterne, al fine di determinare l'ammissibilità di questi ultimi e stabilirà altresì se il loro viaggio rappresenta un rischio per la sicurezza, un rischio di immigrazione irregolare o un alto rischio epidemico.A tal proposito, il testo oggetto di votazione introduce modifiche tecniche necessarie a rendere pienamente operativo il sistema ETIAS, modificando gli atti giuridici riguardanti i sistemi informatici dell'UE consultati dall'ETIAS, e specialmente il sistema europeo di informazione sui casellari giudiziali riguardo ai cittadini di Paesi terzi ("sistema ECRIS-TCN").In sintesi, il sistema ETIAS potrà comparare i dati di coloro che richiedono un'autorizzazione a viaggiare nella UE, con i dati contenuti nelle altre banche dati europee, al fine di stabilire se tale individuo abbia precedenti penali.Trattandosi di un sistema informatico finalizzato al contrasto della migrazione irregolare e a tutela della pubblica sicurezza, in linea con il voto espresso in plenaria nel 2018 e in commissione LIBE nell'aprile 2021, ho espresso voto positivo.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
La Commissione europea, ha presentato lo scorso 17 marzo, la proposta di creare un Certificato verde digitale per facilitare l'esercizio del diritto di libera circolazione nell'UE, durante la pandemia di COVID-19. Tale certificato interoperabile, disponibile in formato digitale e cartaceo con QR code digitale. Alla luce di questa proposta, i colegislatori hanno lavorato tramite una procedura d'urgenza e si sono accordati su diversi emendamenti, anche proposti dal nostro gruppo, che in linea generale migliorano il testo. I dati personali contenuti nei certificati restano in possesso del solo Stato di emissione, e non possono essere conservati negli Stati membri di destinazione. Non ci sarà pertanto, una banca dati centrale stabilita a livello UE. Il trattamento degli stessi, da parte dei singoli Stati, dovrà avvenire nel pieno rispetto del regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati (GDPR).In conclusione, seppure l'esclusione dei test sierologici dal testo, sia per noi un errore, i miglioramenti ottenuti in sede plenaria e durante il negoziato con il Consiglio, e soprattutto i potenziali benefici che il certificato potrà generare in termini di armonizzazione delle disposizioni relative ai viaggi tra Paesi UE e di conseguenza a favore della ripartenza economica, mi hanno condotto ad un voto positivo.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - third-country nationals (C9-0100/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Tale proposta di regolamento sui Certificati verdi digitali per i cittadini di Paesi terzi che soggiornano o risiedono legalmente nell'UE, è sostanzialmente la proposta gemella, rispetto a quella che istituisce un certificato digitale COVID-19 per i cittadini dell'Unione. La proposta si basa sull'articolo 77 del TFUE, relativo ai controlli e all'attraversamento delle frontiere, con riferimento ai cittadini di Paesi terzi.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (A9-0174/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
La proposta mira a sostituire lo statuto del Mediatore vigente, modificato da ultimo nel 2008, prima dell'entrata in vigore del Trattato di Lisbona; intende, inoltre, rafforzare e migliorare ulteriormente il ruolo e l'efficacia dell'organo. Il progetto concordato in votazione, copre competenze di cui il Mediatore è già dotato e dettaglia le procedure per l'esercizio delle sue funzioni: il Mediatore esercita le sue funzioni in piena indipendenza e agisce senza alcuna autorizzazione preliminare. Contribuisce a individuare casi di cattiva amministrazione nell'azione delle istituzioni, degli organi e degli organismi dell'Unione, fatta eccezione per la Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea nell'esercizio delle sue funzioni giurisdizionali. Se del caso, il Mediatore formula raccomandazioni, proposte di soluzione e suggerimenti di miglioramento per affrontare la questione. Trattandosi di uno strumento anche a disposizione dei cittadini, che dovrebbe contribuire a rendere l'attività della pubblica amministrazione più trasparente e informata a buon andamento, rafforzare e migliorare ulteriormente il ruolo e l'efficacia dell'organo è un obiettivo da sostenere, al fine di garantire meccanismi di ricorso accessibili, anche in ottica deflattiva del contenzioso avanti la CGUE.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Transitional provisions in order to address the impact of COVID-19 crisis (amendment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1628) (C9-0185/2021)
La Commissione ha pubblicato la proposta di regolamento che modifica il regolamento (UE) 2016/1628 (sulle emissioni delle macchine mobili non stradali - NRMM) per quanto riguarda le disposizioni transitorie di alcune macchine dotate di motori nella gamma di potenza tra 56kW e 130 kW e superiore a 300kW, per affrontare l'impatto della crisi COVID-19. Questa proposta mira a inserire un rinvio di 6 mesi al termine per il completamento della produzione di macchine che utilizzano motori di transizione e di 9 mesi per la loro immissione sul mercato. Il rinvio è principalmente legato alle attuali carenze di componenti. Il dossier è molto importante per l'intero comparto delle macchine agricole, in particolare quello italiano che riveste un ruolo di primissimo piano proprio nella categoria di potenza 56-130 kW. È importante sottolineare che questa proroga non ha alcun impatto ambientale, in quanto si applica solo ad un limitato quantitativo di motori già prodotti prima dell'entrata in vigore dello Stage V e già acquistati dai costruttori. Semplicemente, a causa delle problematiche legate alla pandemia e alle numerose criticità nelle catene di fornitura, non è possibile completare la produzione delle macchine entro il 30 giugno.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Meeting the Global Covid-19 challenge: effects of waiver of the WTO TRIPS agreement on Covid-19 vaccines, treatment, equipment and increasing production and manufacturing capacity in developing countries (RC-B9-0306/2021, B9-0306/2021, B9-0307/2021, B9-0308/2021, B9-0309/2021, B9-0310/2021, B9-0311/2021)
Il testo della risoluzione offre una prospettiva equilibrata dello stato attuale della pandemia COVID-19 e della produzione e dell'accesso ai vaccini e ai prodotti sanitari in generale. Successivamente, essendo che, sulla questione specifica della deroga all'accordo TRIPS dell'OMC (l'accordo che regola gli aspetti commerciali dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale) è stato impossibile trovare una posizione comune, sia tra i diversi gruppi sia all'interno degli stessi, sono stati presentati diversi emendamenti che affrontano direttamente la questione. L'obiettivo della deroga sarebbe quello di permettere anche ai Paesi attualmente non produttori di vaccini, in particolare quelli in via di sviluppo, di iniziare a produrre vaccini per conto proprio in modo da aumentare la risposta globale alla COVID-19. La Lega è a favore di una deroga all'Accordo TRIPS in circostanze eccezionali, come quelle attuali dovute alla pandemia COVID-19, e a patto che sia temporanea, dato che l'Accordo TRIPS, rimane comunque un importante strumento necessario a proteggere i diritti di proprietà intellettuale.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The EU's Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade (B9-0305/2021)
Nel dicembre 2020, la Commissione e l'Alto rappresentante dell'Unione per gli Affari Esteri e la Politica di Sicurezza, hanno presentato una nuova strategia di sicurezza informatica dell'UE. La strategia, che è un elemento chiave della strategia "Shaping Europe's Digital Future", il piano europeo di ripresa e la strategia dell'Unione di sicurezza dell'UE, mira a preservare un internet aperto e globale, fornendo al contempo garanzie, non solo per assicurare la sicurezza, ma anche per proteggere i valori europei e i diritti fondamentali di tutti. La strategia contiene proposte per iniziative di regolamentazione, investimento e politica in tre aree di azione dell'UE: resilienza, sovranità tecnologica e leadership; Rafforzare le capacità operative di prevenzione, deterrenza e risposta; promuovere un cyberspazio aperto e globale attraverso una cooperazione rafforzata. Sono stati inclusi suggerimenti del gruppo ID sulle PMI, sulla sovranità digitale, sui rischi di applicazione extraterritoriale delle leggi sui dati e sulle prerogative da lasciare agli Stati membri in questo settore.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities (B9-0328/2021, B9-0330/2021, B9-0332/2021, B9-0339/2021, B9-0340/2021, B9-0344/2021)
La risoluzione condanna fermamente il dirottamento e l'atterraggio forzato del volo Ryanair FR4978 del 23 maggio a Minsk e la detenzione da parte delle autorità bielorusse, del giornalista Raman Pratasevich e di Sofia Sapega e considera questo atto una violazione del diritto internazionale, che costituisce un atto di terrorismo di Stato e chiede il rilascio immediato e incondizionato di Raman Pratasevich e Sofia Sapega, nonché di tutti gli altri giornalisti e prigionieri politici detenuti in Bielorussia. Nel testo si ribadisce il mancato riconoscimento dell'elezione di Aliaksandr Lukashenka alla carica di presidente della Bielorussia: considera l'attuale regime in Bielorussia illegittimo, illegale e criminale, continua a sostenere il popolo bielorusso nelle sue legittime richieste. Si esprime preoccupazione per il coinvolgimento della Russia con il regime di Lukashenka, compreso il sostegno finanziario e la stretta cooperazione tra i servizi di intelligence. Si ribadisce la necessità di una posizione unificata di tutti gli Stati membri in reazione al terrorismo di Stato, orchestrato dal regime di Aliaksandr Lukashenka e sostenuto dal Cremlino; sottolinea l'importanza per l'UE di contrastare la disinformazione sulla situazione in Bielorussia all'interno dell'UE, nonché altre forme di minacce ibride intraprese da terzi al riguardo.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Promoting gender equality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and careers (A9-0163/2021 - Susana Solís Pérez)
Il progetto di rapporto riguardante la "promozione dell'uguaglianza di genere nell'istruzione e nelle carriere scientifiche, tecnologiche, ingegneristiche e matematiche (STEM)", si basa sul sunto, che l'uguaglianza di genere, è una precondizione fondamentale per il pieno godimento dei diritti umani da parte delle donne e delle ragazze, ed è essenziale per la loro emancipazione e per il raggiungimento di una società sostenibile e inclusiva. Questa precondizione è fondante, anche per i futuri sviluppi economici nei settori ricerca ed innovazione, associati sia ai singoli, che alle PMI.Per quanto descritto, colmare il divario di genere nelle carriere STEM, avrebbe un impatto positivo nel ridurre il divario retributivo di genere e il divario pensionistico di genere. Nonostante alcune criticità del testo, ho espresso voto positivo in quanto condivido l'approccio complessivo volto a promuovere la partecipazione femminile nei settori della scienza, della tecnologia, dell'ingegneria e della matematica (STEM).
Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union (A9-0244/2021 - Tomas Tobé)
A partire dal 1º gennaio 2021 l'assistenza dell'Unione a favore dei PTOM (paesi e territori d'oltremare), precedentemente finanziata dal Fondo europeo di sviluppo (FES), dovrebbe essere finanziata dal bilancio generale dell'Unione.L'associazione tra l'Unione e i PTOM dovrebbe continuare a fondarsi su tre grandi pilastri, ossia il miglioramento della competitività, il rafforzamento della resilienza e la riduzione della vulnerabilità, nonché la promozione della cooperazione e dell'integrazione tra i PTOM e altri partner e regioni vicine.L'assistenza finanziaria stanziata dall'Unione nel quadro del partenariato dovrebbe conferire una prospettiva europea allo sviluppo dei PTOM e contribuire a consolidare i legami stretti e di lunga data instaurati con essi, rafforzando al contempo la posizione dei PTOM in quanto avamposto dell'Unione, sulla base dei valori e della storia comuni che legano i partner. Ho espresso voto favorevole anche per coerenza con i voti precedentemente espressi.
Towards a stronger partnership with the EU outermost regions (A9-0241/2021 - Stéphane Bijoux)
L'articolo 349 del trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea è lo strumento per lo sviluppo e la ricostruzione delle Regioni Ultraperiferiche (RUP) e che, in base alla relazione, dovrebbe essere ulteriormente consolidato e pienamente integrato in tutte le politiche europee.La recente crisi pandemica ha confermato l'enorme resilienza in questi territori geograficamente distanti dal continente europeo, ma ha anche messo in evidenza ciò che deve ancora essere fatto per compensare il sottosviluppo strutturale e le disuguaglianze nello sviluppo e nella lotta contro la povertà.Al culmine della crisi, quando il blocco ha richiesto la chiusura delle rotte aeree e dei collegamenti marittimi nelle RUP, l'importanza dell'insularità e i vincoli della lontananza hanno immediatamente sollevato molti interrogativi; i settori chiave dell'agricoltura, della pesca e della produzione locale hanno dimostrato il loro carattere indispensabile ed è, pertanto, prioritario il sostegno europeo per consentire il loro sviluppo e la loro transizione ecologica.Affinché il rafforzamento delle RUP dopo la Brexit e soprattutto dopo il Covid sia efficace, è necessario consolidare e integrare in un partenariato rafforzato tra l'Europa e le RUP tutti gli insegnamenti tratti da questa gestione delle crisi e i risultati ottenuti in termini di innovazione negli orientamenti strategici, di fondamentale utilità dei Fondi strutturali europei e di semplificazione amministrativa.Al tempo stesso, l'Europa deve incoraggiare e creare nelle RUP le condizioni per conciliare l'economia e l'ambiente. Si tratta di una questione veramente urgente per le RUP che, in un contesto di fragilità sociale, economica e climatica, devono affrontare la duplice sfida dell'occupazione e della salvaguardia della loro eccezionale biodiversità.La relazione sostiene e chiede che, pur impegnandosi ad attuare un Green Deal , l'Europa deve anche attuare un "Blue Deal " per proteggere, sviluppare e sfruttare il potenziale marittimo e oceanico dei suoi territori.Le RUP sono le linee di punta dell'Europa per l'Atlantico e l'Oceano Indiano. Questa importante posizione geostrategica significa che le RUP devono essere in grado di sviluppare un partenariato regionale e una strategia di scambio con i loro vicini regionali. L'Europa, da parte sua, deve fare in modo di non perturbare l'equilibrio delle relazioni regionali delle RUP firmando accordi di partenariato economico o accordi di libero scambio con paesi terzi che non tengono conto della necessità di tutelare gli interessi delle regioni ultraperiferiche UE. Ho espresso voto positivo.
A new approach to the Atlantic maritime strategy (A9-0243/2021 - Younous Omarjee)
La strategia atlantica ha instaurato una cooperazione più ambiziosa, aperta ed efficace nella regione dell'Oceano Atlantico, individuandone le sfide e le opportunità. Si è trattato indubbiamente di un primo passo importante, che tuttavia, ha dimostrato quasi subito la necessità di migliorare l'architettura del futuro piano d'azione, di rafforzarne la governance e di coinvolgere maggiormente le regioni.Il nuovo piano d'azione è contrassegnato da alcuni miglioramenti: le regioni atlantiche sono maggiormente coinvolte nella governance, il meccanismo di assistenza è stato rafforzato ed è stata ampliata la selettività delle priorità. Resta il punto debole dell'assenza di un fondo dedicato alla strategia atlantica.Lo spazio atlantico affronta oggi sfide ancora grandi: vi è un urgente bisogno di rispondere alla crisi socioeconomica aggravata dall'attuale pandemia e dalla Brexit, e occorre affrontare le minacce ecosistemiche, promuovere la neutralità climatica e rispondere alle nuove emergenze periferiche.Si incoraggia l'evoluzione della strategia atlantica verso una macroregione atlantica, al fine di migliorare il coordinamento tra le sfide marittime e terrestri, rafforzare il peso politico della strategia garantendo una governance multilivello, e razionalizzare le diverse fonti di finanziamento.Nella relazione si chiede al Consiglio dell'Unione europea di dare alla Commissione il mandato di creare una macroregione atlantica e, in parallelo, di condurre un'analisi di questa nuova strategia macroregionale e dei potenziali benefici per gli Stati membri e le loro regioni.Questa macroregione riunirebbe le facciate costiere di Spagna, Francia, Irlanda e Portogallo, così come le regioni ultraperiferiche, per rafforzare la loro cooperazione terra-mare e razionalizzare la governance e le varie fonti di finanziamento.Si insiste sulla promozione della pesca sostenibile, del turismo responsabile, dello sviluppo di una strategia industriale atlantica legata all'economia blu e della ricerca oceanografica. Sul fronte della governance, si chiede l'inclusione dei rappresentanti di tutte le regioni interessate nelle delegazioni nazionali, così come quelli delle regioni ultraperiferiche e dei comuni costieri nell'attuazione del piano d'azione "Atlantico 2.0". Ho espresso voto positivo.
Extension of validity of safety certificates and licences of railway undertakings operating in the Channel tunnel (C9-0314/2021)
La proposta modifica il regolamento (UE) 2020/2222 al fine di garantire la continuità dei servizi ferroviari transfrontalieri con il Regno Unito oltre il 30 settembre 2021. Trattandosi di una mera proroga di data, è stata richiesta una adozione tramite procedura d'urgenza, direttamente con voto in plenaria.Al fine di garantire la connettività tra l'Unione europea e il Regno Unito, in seguito al suo recesso dall'Unione europea, il regolamento (UE) 2020/2222 ha, infatti, stabilito misure per garantire la continuità dei servizi ferroviari transfrontalieri, prorogando fino al 30 settembre 2021 il periodo di validità delle licenze rilasciate dal Regno Unito agli operatori ferroviari stabiliti nel suo territorio, nonché quello dei certificati di sicurezza rilasciati a tali imprese dalla Commissione intergovernativa istituita ai sensi del Trattato tra il Regno Unito e Francia per la costruzione e l'esercizio del tunnel.In questo contesto, Francia e Regno Unito hanno negoziato un accordo transfrontaliero sui certificati di sicurezza. La Francia ha inoltre negoziato un accordo transfrontaliero sulla concessione di licenze alle imprese ferroviarie.È necessario ulteriore tempo per completare le procedure formali richieste dalla legge di entrambe le parti per l'applicazione provvisoria o l'entrata in vigore di questi accordi. Si prevede che tali procedure si estendano per sei mesi dopo la scadenza, il 30 settembre 2021, delle misure di emergenza attualmente in vigore, fino al 31 marzo 2022. Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for the treatment of certain infections in humans (B9-0424/2021)
La proposta di risoluzione chiede di modificare i criteri stabiliti dalla Commissione europea per la designazione degli antimicrobici destinati esclusivamente all'uomo, invitando a rivedere il nuovo regolamento sui medicinali veterinari.Se approvata, la risoluzione potrebbe condurre al divieto dell'uso veterinario di alcune classi di antimicrobici indispensabili per la cura di infezioni batteriche gravi e potenzialmente letali negli animali di tutte le specie, oltre a mettere gravemente a rischio la salute e il benessere animale anche per gli animali da compagnia, con gravi conseguenze per la diffusione delle malattie zoonotiche.Inoltre la risoluzione non prende in considerazione la consulenza scientifica delle agenzie dell'UE, sviluppata con il contributo di esperti scientifici anche di livello internazionale in materia di salute umana e animale.Approvando la risoluzione si scardina il sistema già previsto dal regolamento sui medicinali veterinari, in base al quale è già previsto un uso più prudente e razionale degli antimicrobici.Ho pertanto espresso voto negativo.
Plans and actions to accelerate a transition to innovation without the use of animals in research, regulatory testing and education (RC-B9-0425/2021, B9-0425/2021, B9-0426/2021, B9-0427/2021, B9-0428/2021, B9-0429/2021, B9-0432/2021)
La presente risoluzione invita la Commissione a migliorare il coordinamento per conseguire l'obiettivo di guidare la graduale eliminazione attiva mediante la riduzione, il perfezionamento e la sostituzione delle procedure su animali vivi a fini scientifici, non appena ciò sia scientificamente possibile e senza abbassare il livello di protezione della salute umana e dell'ambiente.Si sottolinea che il piano d'azione dovrebbe includere obiettivi e calendari ambiziosi e realizzabili da fissare nell'ambito dell'obiettivo generale di riduzione e sostituzione al fine di incentivare il cambiamento, con azioni concrete e coordinate accompagnate da indicatori.Inoltre, si chiede di approfondire lo Spazio europeo della ricerca e che il piano si basi sulle ricerche condotte finora nell'UE e preveda meccanismi per il finanziamento preferenziale dei metodi non basati sugli animali in tutte le iniziative di ricerca e innovazione dell'UE, in quanto tali metodi alternativi comportano costi aggiuntivi e necessità di investimento.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Situation in Afghanistan (RC-B9-0455/2021, B9-0433/2021, B9-0453/2021, B9-0455/2021, B9-0458/2021, B9-0459/2021, B9-0460/2021, B9-0462/2021)
Il testo condanna la presa del potere da parte dei talebani, ne critica il governo de facto, rimarcando le discriminazioni nei confronti delle minoranze etniche e religiose del paese e il fatto che sia stato formato senza mantenere le promesse di un governo inclusivo. Il paese sta affrontando una catastrofe umanitaria: vi sono gravi carenze di cibo, acqua e medicinali e 18,4 milioni di afghani hanno bisogno di sostegno umanitario.La crisi in Afghanistan è innanzitutto una tragedia per il popolo afghano, ma mette anche a rischio la stessa sicurezza dell'UE; si considera che l'UE dovrebbe trarre le conseguenze da questo fallimento collettivo e prepararsi alle sue conseguenze sulla nostra sicurezza, compresa una possibile maggiore minaccia di terrorismo, e si ritiene che i jihadisti di tutto il mondo si sentano incoraggiati dalla presa del potere da parte dei talebani; si sottolinea che gli afghani fuggiti dal loro paese abbiano cercato rifugio principalmente nei paesi vicini, ma anche in Europa. Inoltre, sottolinea che il sostegno finanziario europeo tramite le autorità è subordinato al mantenimento e alla valorizzazione dei risultati degli ultimi 20 anni.Nonostante vi siano anche dei punti critici, ho espresso voto positivo.
Situation in Lebanon (RC-B9-0465/2021, B9-0464/2021, B9-0465/2021, B9-0466/2021, B9-0467/2021, B9-0468/2021, B9-0469/2021, B9-0470/2021)
La risoluzione sottolinea come l'attuale situazione in Libano sia estremamente allarmante e preoccupante a causa della crisi politica, economica, sociale, finanziaria e sanitaria e dello stato di collasso istituzionale.Si prende atto della recente formazione del governo, ricordando l'importanza delle scadenze elettorali del 2022, elezioni che non devono essere rinviate e devono essere libere e garantire standard internazionali di trasparenza. A questo scopo si offre l'assistenza dell'UE tramite una missione elettorale ad hoc, così come una missione di assistenza pre-elettorale.Si chiede urgentemente un'indagine trasparente, indipendente ed efficace sull'esplosione del porto di Beirut, invitando le autorità libanesi ad assistere i giudici, non intralciandone il lavoro.Rispetto al quadro di sanzioni UE, la risoluzione sottolinea che l'introduzione di sanzioni mirate per l'ostruzione o l'indebolimento del processo politico democratico resta un'opzione che potrebbe essere attivata qualora gli attori responsabili in Libano continuino a ostacolare la riforma e la lotta alla corruzione.Infine, si esprime solidarietà ai difensori dei diritti umani, alla società civile, ai partner socio-economici e al popolo libanese, ricordando i valori che ci accomunano, quali la democrazia, il pluralismo, il rispetto dei diritti umani e dello Stato di diritto.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The future of EU-US relations (A9-0250/2021 - Tonino Picula)
Il testo è molto ampio e affronta quindi tutti gli ambiti in cui è possibile e necessario cooperare con un alleato storico e naturale dell'UE, gli Stati Uniti, citando l'importanza delle relazioni transatlantiche e il ruolo della NATO, ma anche l'approccio da mantenere con Cina e Russia e nei Balcani occidentali, così come sulle sfide globali quali ripresa economica, lotta ai cambiamenti climatici e alla disuguaglianza, difesa dei diritti umani e dei principi democratici, e ritorno al multilateralismo efficace.Si fa riferimento, inoltre, a una serie di nuove sfide comuni, tra cui l'influenza nociva dei regimi autoritari che pregiudicano le istituzioni multilaterali, l'impatto socioeconomico della pandemia, la promozione della salute globale, l'emergenza climatica e la necessità di intensificare le misure volte alla mitigazione climatica, la lotta contro un'ondata globale di autoritarismo, la lotta contro le reti criminali globali e il terrorismo, la realizzazione dell'uguaglianza di genere e dell'antidiscriminazione, il superamento del crescente divario tra aree metropolitane e zone rurali e il perseguimento della trasformazione digitale e verde quale mezzo di modernizzazione sostenibile, il progresso tecnologico, come l'intelligenza artificiale e la cibersicurezza, l'elusione fiscale e sfide di più ampia portata legate alla digitalizzazione dell'economia.
State of EU cyber defence capabilities (A9-0234/2021 - Urmas Paet)
La relazione riguarda lo stato delle capacità di ciberdifesa dell'UE e la visione strategica, ovvero garantire una ciberdifesa resiliente, il rafforzamento dei partenariati e il ruolo dell'UE nel contesto internazionale.Nel testo vengono menzionati i conflitti ibridi con avversari geopolitici e le minacce esterne da attori quali Russia, Cina e Corea del Nord, sottolineando a più riprese l'importanza di innalzare il livello di cibersicurezza all'interno dell'UE.Si sottolinea che, ai fini dello sviluppo di un'Unione europea della difesa approfondita e rafforzata, una politica comune di ciberdifesa e una notevole cooperazione a livello dell'UE per la creazione di capacità informatiche militari comuni e per il miglioramento di quelle nazionali sono elementi essenziali e richiedono un mix complesso di capacità tecniche, strategiche e operative.Infine si chiede un più stretto coordinamento in materia di ciberdifesa tra gli Stati membri, le istituzioni dell'UE, gli alleati della NATO, le Nazioni Unite e l'Organizzazione per la sicurezza e la cooperazione in Europa (OSCE), sottolineando anche l'importanza di dotarsi di un partenariato solido nel settore informatico con il Regno Unito, che è una nazione leader in termini di arsenale di ciberdifesa.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The Arctic: opportunities, concerns and security challenges (A9-0239/2021 - Anna Fotyga)
La relazione sostiene che la responsabilità primaria dello sviluppo sostenibile dell'Artico spetta agli Stati artici, ma non si può negare l'impatto significativo di fattori esterni e che la comunità internazionale ha quindi l'obbligo di proteggere le regioni artiche e garantirne la stabilità e sicurezza.La stabilità dell'Artico è stata a lungo relativamente preservata, ma è sempre più influenzata dal crescente interesse internazionale nella regione e dal mutevole panorama della sicurezza, compresa la progressiva rimilitarizzazione della federazione russa nella regione.Inoltre i progetti e le iniziative di vasta portata della Cina sono motivo di grande preoccupazione: considerando che la Cina ha pubblicato il suo primo Libro bianco sulla politica artica nel gennaio 2018 e che si è impegnata in uno sforzo a lungo termine per rafforzare la sua posizione nell'Artico, dichiarandosi uno "Stato vicino all'Artico" con l'ambizione di diventare una "potenza polare" e che sta rafforzando la collaborazione con la Russia nell'Artico, si ritiene che l'inclusione dell'Artico da parte della Cina nei suoi programmi di sviluppo economico, con l'aspirazione di integrare la rotta marittima settentrionale dell'Artico nella sua iniziativa Belt and Road (come "Via della seta polare") debba essere attentamente osservata dall'UE.Si chiede un aumento dell'accessibilità delle infrastrutture digitali nell'Artico, promuovendo in tal modo l'imprenditorialità, l'innovazione e ...
The protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt (A9-0261/2021 - Alex Agius Saliba)
Le petizioni relative ai diritti delle persone con disabilità sono rimaste relativamente stabili nel corso degli ultimi anni: nel 2018 sono state presentate 23 petizioni (1,2 %), nel 2019 sono state presentate 12 petizioni (0,6 %) e nel 2020 sono state presentate 20 petizioni (1,2 %).Le preoccupazioni più comuni in materia di uguaglianza delle persone con disabilità manifestate dagli autori delle petizioni riguardano l'accessibilità e la protezione sociale, il riconoscimento reciproco della disabilità negli Stati membri nonché l'istruzione inclusiva e i diritti del lavoro.La relazione di iniziativa analizza gli ostacoli che le persone con disabilità devono affrontare in vari settori (accesso ai trasporti pubblici, ambiente costruito, uso della lingua dei segni, finanziamenti e accesso all'istruzione) e si pone principalmente 3 obiettivi: sensibilizzare riguardo alle questioni affrontate dalle persone con disabilità; sollecitare gli Stati membri dell'UE affinché garantiscano la corretta applicazione delle leggi esistenti dell'Unione che proteggono, promuovono e monitorano i diritti delle persone con disabilità; e sollecitare la Commissione affinché intensifichi il monitoraggio dell'attuazione del diritto dell'UE e migliori la normativa esistente laddove si accerti che non è adeguata a tutelare i diritti delle persone con disabilità.Ho espresso voto favorevole.
Reforming the EU policy on harmful tax practices (including the reform of the Code of Conduct Group) (A9-0245/2021 - Aurore Lalucq)
La relazione riguarda gli ultimi scandali fiscali, in particolare i Luxleaks, i Panama Papers, i Paradise Papers e, più recentemente, le rivelazioni di OpenLux e sottolinea che l'evasione e l'elusione fiscale comportano per gli Stati membri una perdita che, secondo le stime prudenti dell'OCSE, costa circa il 4-10 % del gettito fiscale globale delle imprese, ovvero 100-240 miliardi di dollari USA (84-202 EUR) all'anno.Si accolgono quindi con favore le azioni significative a livello UE e internazionale per rafforzare i principi di trasparenza fiscale, combattere la concorrenza fiscale dannosa e garantire il rispetto delle misure contro le pratiche fiscali dannose.La relazione affronta anche il problema dell'elusione e dell'evasione fiscale delle multinazionali e quello di una soluzione internazionale (o europea) all'aliquota fiscale minima, evidenziando esplicitamente la questione dei paradisi fiscali, in particolare quelli europei, su cui si propone di procedere allo stesso modo che con i paesi terzi in lista nera o le giurisdizioni terze non cooperative.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Protecting workers from asbestos (A9-0275/2021 - Nikolaj Villumsen)
Si tratta di una relazione di iniziativa legislativa che propone di elaborare una strategia europea globale per la rimozione dell'amianto (ESRAA) nell'UE, sfruttando le sinergie di diversi settori politici, per eliminare in modo sicuro l'amianto dall'ambiente edificato e proteggere così i lavoratori e i cittadini, ora e in futuro. Nella relazione, fra le altre cose, viene evidenziata la difficoltà della procedura di rimozione dell'amianto, la necessità di strumenti tecnologi avanzati, di garantire la disponibilità di adeguate strutture per i rifiuti e di sostenere le piccole e medie imprese.Nonostante alcune parti problematiche, nel complesso la relazione è soddisfacente e affronta un tema urgente d'attualità, per questo ho espresso un voto positivo.
The effectiveness of Member States' use of EU Solidarity Fund money in cases of natural disasters (A9-0273/2021 - Corina Crețu)
Il Fondo di solidarietà dell'Unione europea (FSUE) è stato originariamente istituito nel 2002, come reazione alle gravi inondazioni in Europa centrale e per fornire assistenza finanziaria agli Stati membri e ai paesi candidati colpiti da calamità naturali, quali inondazioni, terremoti o tempeste, tuttavia oggi il FSUE è diventato uno dei principali strumenti dell'Unione per la ripresa dalle catastrofi.La risoluzione sottolinea l'importante ruolo della prevenzione e della gestione del rischio di catastrofi nell'UE e invita la Commissione a facilitare la creazione di un piano coordinato per una valutazione accurata e rapida dei danni e chiede a ciascun paese beneficiario di specificare nelle loro relazioni di attuazione le misure preventive che hanno adottato o prevedono di adottare, compreso il modo in cui utilizzeranno i fondi strutturali dell'Unione per limitare i danni futuri ed evitare, per quanto possibile, il ripetersi di simili catastrofi naturali.Si sottolinea che le sfide future, che si tratti di cambiamenti climatici o di emergenze sanitarie, richiedono innanzitutto una politica di prevenzione; osserva che il FSUE è di natura curativa; ricorda pertanto la necessità di sinergie efficaci con altre politiche e programmi dell'Unione, in particolare i fondi della politica di coesione, il meccanismo di protezione civile dell'Unione e le politiche e i programmi dell'Unione a sostegno della prevenzione delle catastrofi e della gestione dei rischi.La relazione sottolinea che, nonostante la prominenza della crisi COVID-19, il FSUE deve continuare a fornire sostegno ai paesi che si stanno riprendendo dalle catastrofi naturali.Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation (A9-0265/2021 - Charlie Weimers)
Si considera Taiwan un partner chiave e un alleato democratico nell'Indo-Pacifico per i suoi meriti, in quanto democrazia solida ed economia tecnologicamente avanzata. Si esprime grave preoccupazione per la continua pressione militare della Cina contro Taiwan e si esorta la Cina a desistere da qualsiasi attività destabilizzante contro Taiwan, in particolare attraverso i considerevoli investimenti cinesi in capacità militari, le esercitazioni di assalto e le frequenti violazioni dello spazio aereo di Taiwan. Si richiama inoltre la retorica cinese che segnala la sua intenzione apparentemente contraddittoria di voler incorporare Taiwan sotto il dominio totalitario del Partito Comunista Cinese (PCC).Il testo esprime serie preoccupazioni per la situazione nel Mar Cinese orientale e meridionale e ribadisce l'importanza di rispettare il diritto internazionale. Si incoraggiano maggiori scambi, incontri e cooperazione economici, scientifici, culturali, politici e interpersonali tra l'UE e Taiwan e con la partecipazione di rappresentanti degli Stati membri in modo da riflettere pienamente la cooperazione dinamica, sfaccettata e stretta tra l'UE e Taiwan, in quanto partner affini. Si elogia Taiwan quale partner eccezionale nella promozione dei diritti umani e della libertà di religione nella regione indo-pacifica e riconosce la performance di Taiwan nel dare l'esempio nella regione con il suo forte rispetto delle libertà fondamentali, sia economiche che sociali. Si chiede di continuare ad adottare iniziative per migliorare le relazioni economiche bilaterali e i contatti interpersonali.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe (A9-0246/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
Il dossier riporta la creazione di 9 partenariati pubblici-privati all'interno del programma Horizon Europe. Nel testo si parla sia di criteri e obiettivi generali, che le caratteristiche specifiche di ognuno dei partenariati. I 9 partenariati definiti all'interno della normativa sono: Circular Bio-Based Europe Joint Undertaking, Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking, Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking, Global Health EDCTP3 Joint Undertaking, Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking, Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking, Single European Sky ATM Research 3 Joint Undertaking e Smart Network and Services Joint Undertaking.Avendo supportato Horizon Europe dalla sua creazione, ho supportato anche questi partenariati, essendo finanziati dai fondi pubblici previsti nel programma Horizon Europe.
Insolvency proceedings: replacing Annexes A and B to the Regulation (A9-0293/2021 - Adrián Vázquez Lázara)
La relazione in votazione attiene all'approvazione in prima lettura, della proposta di regolamento che sostituisce gli allegati A e B del regolamento (UE) 2015/848 relativo alle procedure di insolvenza. Si tratta di uno strumento di cooperazione giudiziaria in materia civile, per una gestione efficiente delle situazioni d'insolvenza transfrontaliere di debitori il cui centro di interesse principale, si trovi in uno Stato membro. Gli allegati A e B sono fondamentali per definire l'ambito di applicazione del regolamento in parola, elencando in modo esaustivo le procedure di insolvenza (Allegato A) o gli amministratori delle stesse (Allegato B) contemplati dalle legislazioni nazionali cui esso si applica. Tali allegati devono dunque essere regolarmente aggiornati, al fine di rispecchiare la situazione giuridica effettiva negli Stati membri. Nell'ottobre 2020, i Paesi Bassi hanno notificato alla Commissione, le modifiche recentemente apportate alla legge nazionale rilevante, che hanno introdotto un nuovo regime preventivo per le procedure di insolvenza e ulteriori tipologie di amministratori. Sono poi seguite, nel dicembre 2020, notifiche da parte di Italia, Lituania, Cipro e Polonia. Si è pertanto reso opportuno e necessario modificare il regolamento, in particolare gli allegati menzionati, affinché l'ambito di applicazione rifletta l'attuale stato delle diverse normative nazionali in materia.La commissione JURI ha apportato alcuni emendamenti al testo della proposta della Commissione, al solo fine di dare atto delle notifiche pervenute successivamente da parte di Germania, Ungheria e Austria, della esatta data di entrata in vigore delle nuove disposizioni in materia di insolvenza e ristrutturazione adottate dall'Italia e della non partecipazione all'adozione del regolamento, di Danimarca e Irlanda, conformemente a quanto previsto dai Protocolli 21 e 22 allegati ai Trattati.Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU sports policy: assessment and possible ways forward (A9-0318/2021 - Tomasz Frankowski)
La relazione cerca di avanzare proposte concrete e raccomandazioni per il settore sportivo europeo. La relazione inoltre chiede che il Parlamento svolga un ruolo più attivo nella diplomazia sportiva e riconosce i club sportivi come fondamento di un'offerta di modello sportivo, in grado di offrire a tutti, la possibilità di praticare lo sport a livello locale, soprattutto i giovani, a prescindere dal loro background culturale o socioeconomico. Il volontariato, le piccole società sportive, vanno riconosciute come radici fondamentali della Unione europea. Condividiamo le posizioni del relatore in questi macro punti: aiutare lo sport a garantire un recupero di successo; promuovere stili di vita sani e attivi, insieme all'istruzione e allo sviluppo di opportunità; garantire uno sport sicuro, inclusivo ed equo; rinnovare il buon governo e l'integrità; valorizzare i principi di un modello sportivo europeo; rafforzare la visibilità, la cooperazione e l'integrazione dello sport nelle politiche dell'UE.Ho espresso voto positivo.
A European strategy for critical raw materials (A9-0280/2021 - Hildegard Bentele)
La relazione d'iniziativa prende spunto dalla sempre più urgente situazione di questi ultimi mesi, proprio durante la pandemia, in cui la scarsità di materie prime critiche ha raggiunto picchi molto elevati, per suggerire al Consiglio e alla Commissione europea una strategia da adottare riguardo questa particolare e cruciale categoria di materiali. Già nei mesi precedenti erano uscite comunicazioni da più parti, che segnalavano il tema come un'opportunità, ma soprattutto come un problema per il futuro industriale del mondo occidentale e dell'Unione europea in particolare, se non affrontata l'urgenza con pensiero lungimirante.Le materie prime vengono considerate "critiche" quando sono di grande rilevanza per un'industria e di cui la fornitura del materiale è ad alto rischio di restrizione. Il livello di rarità nel reperire e poi estrarre il materiale, la sua presenza nel territorio del paese, la sostituzione e il riciclaggio, sono alcuni fattori che ne determinano il livello di criticità. Questo dossier strategico e lungimirante, si è orientato nel trovare le maniere di rendere resiliente il sistema produttivo europeo per quanto riguarda le materie prime critiche per il funzionamento delle catene del valore e possibilmente renderlo prossimamente anche vincente nella competizione globale.Ho espresso voto positivo.
A Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (A9-0317/2021 - Dolors Montserrat)
La crisi generata dalla pandemia della COVID-19, ha portato la salute a ricoprire una posizione di maggiore preminenza nell'agenda dell'Unione europea, ma l'ha anche annoverata tra le principali preoccupazioni dei nostri cittadini. Secondo un recente sondaggio Eurobarometro sul futuro dell'Europa (Eurobarometro speciale 500), i rischi sanitari, sono la terza grande sfida globale per l'UE, dopo i cambiamenti climatici e i temi ambientali e quasi allo stesso livello del terrorismo. L'Europa ha dato prova di grande resilienza e forza durante la crisi sanitaria. Tuttavia, la pandemia ha anche messo a nudo le criticità dei nostri sistemi sanitari.La nuova strategia farmaceutica è uno dei pilastri dell'Unione europea della salute. Se pienamente attuata, potrebbe correggere le criticità di lunga data che interessano il settore dei medicinali, quali l'accessibilità economica, l'accesso e la penuria di medicinali, sostenere la ricerca in linea con le esigenze dei pazienti e dei sistemi sanitari e rafforzare e innovare l'industria farmaceutica. La nuova strategia può contribuire a costruire un sistema farmaceutico dell'Unione europea a prova di futuro e resistente alle crisi; la vitalità dell'industria farmaceutica è essenziale non solo per la salute e l'occupazione dell'UE, ma è anche necessaria per rafforzare la sua autonomia strategica, tanto più alla luce dei maggiori rischi di pandemie e della fragilità delle catene di approvvigionamento.Questo importante file serve a garantire ai pazienti l'accesso a medicinali a buon mercato e rispondere alle esigenze mediche non soddisfatte (per esempio per quanto riguarda la resistenza antimicrobica, il cancro e le malattie rare) a favorire la competitività, la capacità di innovazione e la sostenibilità del comparto farmaceutico dell'UE e la produzione di medicinali di alta qualità, sicuri, efficaci e più ecologici, nonché migliorare i meccanismi di preparazione e risposta alle crisi, predisporre catene di approvvigionamento diversificate e sicure, affrontare le carenze di medicinali e assicurare una posizione solida dell'UE sulla scena mondiale, promuovendo standard elevati in termini di qualità, efficacia e sicurezza.Ho espresso voto positivo.
The safety of truck parking lots in the EU (B9-0552/2021)
Lo scorso 15 luglio, è stata discussa nella commissione PETI, questa proposta, corredata di 22.735 firme, che sollevava preoccupazioni in merito alle aree di parcheggio per automezzi pesanti sulla rete stradale dell'UE, chiedendo misure preventive per ridurre il rischio e l'entità dei problemi di sicurezza in tali aree di sosta. La risoluzione in oggetto prende spunto da questa iniziativa, sottolineando come negli ultimi anni vi siano state molteplici aggressioni nei confronti degli autotrasportatori, sfociate anche in episodi di violenza dalle estreme conseguenze, e ponendo l'accento sul ruolo preponderante della criminalità organizzata in questo tipo di azioni delittuose.Secondo uno studio della Commissione europea del 2019, vi è una evidente carenza di aree attrezzate per questo tipo di automezzi, e perlopiù prive di adeguati sistemi di protezione: tra le richieste del testo vi è quindi, quella di intervenire per risolvere questa problematica, anche attraverso l'utilizzo di fondi europei dedicati, al momento disponibili.Andrebbero garantite procedure di certificazione di sicurezza adeguate per le aree di sosta, ed inoltre si chiede una maggiore cooperazione tra le differenti forze di polizia e sicurezza, anche in ambito transfrontaliero. Viene sottolineata inoltre l'importanza di ricorrere alle nuove tecnologie, per garantire sistemi di scambio rapidi e meccanismi di informazione ed allarme coordinati. Si tratta di misure assolutamente condivisibili, che potrebbero diminuire i rischi di aggressione cui sono stati vittime troppi professionisti di questo settore.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fisheries Resources in the North Pacific Ocean: accession of the European Union (A9-0008/2022 - Bert-Jan Ruissen)
La relazione è una richiesta al Parlamento europeo di approvare la proposta di adesione dell'UE alla Convenzione sulla conservazione e la gestione delle risorse della pesca d'alto mare nel Pacifico settentrionale. La domanda di adesione dell'Unione europea alla Commissione per la pesca del Pacifico settentrionale, dopo diversi fallimenti successivi nel 2018, 2019 e 2020, è stata accolta durante la sesta sessione annuale di questa organizzazione regionale della pesca, che si è svolta il 25 febbraio 2021. Questa adesione dovrebbe consentire alle navi dell'UE di pescare nell'Oceano Pacifico settentrionale.In particolare, gli operatori dell'UE che pescano già più a sud, nella zona dell'Organizzazione regionale della pesca del Pacifico meridionale, potranno estendere le loro operazioni alla zona della Convenzione del Pacifico settentrionale.Non comprendendo le specie di tonno presenti nell'area, la convenzione del Pacifico settentrionale stabilisce regole principalmente sui piccoli pelagici come sardoncino americano, lo sgombro americano e la sardina giapponese, nonché le specie di calamari.L'UE si unirà agli attuali membri di questa convenzione: Canada, Cina, Giappone, Repubblica di Corea, Russia, Taiwan, Stati Uniti e Vanuatu. A differenza di questi altri otto paesi membri e di Panama, paese associato dal 2019, non è uno stato dell'area del Pacifico (da qui il fatto che la sua domanda di adesione è stata finora respinta).Rappresentata dalla Commissione europea, l'UE partecipa con 14 organizzazioni regionali di pesca del tonno e non, il che rende l'UE l'attore più presente al mondo nelle organizzazioni di pesca. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund – application EGF/2021/005 FR/AIRBUS – France (A9-0013/2022 - Valérie Hayer)
Si tratta della richiesta di mobilitazione del FEG (Fondo Europeo di adeguamento alla Globalizzazione) da parte della Francia, per ottenere un contributo finanziario, in seguito a 508 esuberi presso l'unità economica e sociale (UES) Airbus, la quale opera nel settore economico della fabbricazione di mezzi di trasporto, al fine di fornire assistenza alle persone interessate per il reinserimento nel mercato del lavoro.Le espulsioni effettuate dall'impresa hanno avuto luogo nelle regioni dei Midi-Pirenei e dei Paesi della Loira. I motivi sarebbero riconducibili alla pandemia di Covid-19 e al conseguente crollo generale dell'aviazione commerciale, in particolare nel settore dei voli passeggieri.La Commissione ha concluso che le condizioni per la concessione di un contributo finanziario del FEG erano soddisfatte e, il 19 novembre 2021, ha adottato una proposta di decisione sulla mobilitazione del FEG a favore della Francia per sostenere il reinserimento nel mercato del lavoro di 297 beneficiari, come richiesto dalla domanda presentata dalle autorità francesi il 26 luglio 2021. Il contributo ammonterebbe a circa 3,7 milioni di euro.Per mobilitare il fondo la Commissione ha presentato all'autorità di bilancio una richiesta di storno dalla riserva del FEG verso la linea attiva del FEG, che il 1° febbraio è stata approvata dalla commissione BUDG. Avendo già sostenuto questo strumento ed essendo a favore di iniziative a supporto dei lavoratori quando motivate, ho espresso voto positivo.
Implementation report on on-farm animal welfare (A9-0296/2021 - Jérémy Decerle)
La relazione riguarda l'attuazione della legislazione dell'Unione in materia di benessere degli animali destinati alla produzione alimentare. Essa si concentra sulla direttiva 98/58/CE riguardante la protezione degli animali negli allevamenti, la direttiva 1999/74/CE sulla protezione delle galline ovaiole, la direttiva 2007/43/CE concernente la protezione dei polli allevati per la produzione di carne, la direttiva 2008/119/CE sulla protezione dei vitelli e la direttiva 2008/120/CE riguardante la protezione dei suini.La relazione si basa sulle conclusioni dello studio "Animal welfare on the farm – ex-post evaluation of the EU legislation: Prospects for animal welfare labelling at EU level" (Il benessere degli animali negli allevamenti). L'idea di un miglioramento, per quanto possibile del benessere animale nell'allevamento è una richiesta sempre più crescente nella società.Ho votato in modo positivo in quanto sostengo un sistema di regole armonizzate per un miglioramento del benessere animale, se queste vengono accettate dagli Stati membri nei loro piani strategici. Sostengo l'idea di un aiuto finanziario specifico per accompagnare allevatori a migliorare gli standard.
Implementation of the Toy Safety Directive (A9-0349/2021 - Brando Benifei)
La relazione d'iniziativa riguarda l'attuazione della direttiva 2009/48/CE sulla sicurezza dei giocattoli. Si tratta di una direttiva di armonizzazione massima ovvero gli Stati membri non avranno la facoltà di adottare prescrizioni diverse da quelle in essa contenute.L'obiettivo è assicurare un elevato livello di protezione dei bambini in tutta l'UE e garantire la libera circolazione dei giocattoli nel mercato interno. A tal fine, essa introduce disposizioni e obblighi precisi per i fabbricanti, gli importatori e i distributori, con disposizioni di applicazione ad opera delle autorità di vigilanza del mercato per i giocattoli non conformi.Dalla relazione di iniziativa emerge la necessità di una revisione della direttiva sulla sicurezza dei giocattoli finanche a suggerire il passaggio da direttiva a regolamento, al fine di migliorare diversi aspetti esaminati dalla relazione stessa.Tra i passaggi più significativi, vengono analizzati: presenza di sostanze chimiche (si invita la Commissione a effettuare una valutazione d'impatto al fine di analizzare se i limiti generici per le sostanze CMR oggetto di deroga nella direttiva sulla sicurezza dei giocattoli debbano essere ridotti; l' e-commerce (i mercati online dovrebbero essere tenuti ad assumersi maggiori responsabilità nel garantire la sicurezza e la conformità dei giocattoli venduti sulle loro piattaforme, in particolare nell'individuare e rimuovere i giocattoli non conformi, anche consultando il sistema Safety Gate, e nel collaborare efficacemente con le autorità di vigilanza del mercato per rimuovere i giocattoli non conformi e impedire la ricomparsa di giocattoli non sicuri); e i giocattoli connessi (data la preoccupazione per le nuove vulnerabilità e i rischi posti dai giocattoli connessi in termini di sicurezza, protezione, vita privata e salute mentale dei bambini, si chiede alla Commissione di valutare la possibilità di estensione dell'ambito di applicazione della direttiva per includervi disposizioni in materia di tutela della vita privata e sicurezza delle informazioni e l'adozione di una legislazione orizzontale sui requisiti di cibersicurezza per i prodotti connessi e i servizi associati). Ho espresso voto positivo.
Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer (A9-0001/2022 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
La Commissione europea ha pubblicato il 3 febbraio 2021 il suo piano contro il cancro, che ha proposto un budget di 4 miliardi e un piano in 10 parti per combattere questa malattia. Essendo stato informato in anticipo dell'intenzione della Commissione di proporre questo piano, ma non essendo stato direttamente coinvolto, il 23 settembre 2020 il Parlamento europeo ha istituito una commissione speciale sulla lotta contro il cancro, il cui unico scopo è quello di produrre un rapporto che elenca le priorità dei parlamentari nella lotta contro il cancro, da inviare alla Commissione in modo che, idealmente, possa correggere la sua copia.La relazione analizza diversi aspetti della malattia, tra cui la prevenzione, lo screening e rilevamento, l'accesso alle cure, chiedendo alla Commissione di attuare diverse iniziative per ciascun ambito.Inoltre, include anche le categorie specifiche, tra cui pazienti, sopravvissuti, badanti, bambini, adolescenti e giovani adulti e tumori rari e chiede l'istituzione di un'assistenza completa di supporto e l'accesso a centri di supporto specializzati, un approccio personalizzato e olistico, il diritto all'oblio per tutti i sopravvissuti al cancro e più ricerca sui loro bisogni specifici. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Tackling non-tariff and non-tax barriers in the single market (A9-0336/2021 - Kosma Złotowski)
Nonostante siano stati raggiunti importanti obiettivi legati al funzionamento del mercato interno, molte barriere non tariffarie che frenano lo sviluppo delle imprese europee, in particolare le piccole e medie imprese che operano in un contesto transfrontaliero, permangono.La relazione di iniziativa sottolinea dunque come la Commissione e altri portatori di interessi abbiano identificato una serie di barriere chiave ingiustificate alle attività transfrontaliere, tra cui, ad esempio le disparità normative e un'attuazione incoerente della legislazione dell'UE che complicano gli scambi transfrontalieri e costringono le imprese a impegnare risorse nel processo di analisi delle disposizioni del diritto dell'UE.Per queste barriere e le altre elencate, nel testo si evidenziano quindi gli effetti sull'accesso a beni e servizi da parte delle imprese e cittadini che a loro volta sono anche lavoratori.Ho espresso voto positivo sul testo perché condivido il principio alla base della relazione: esistono infatti barriere non tariffarie che impediscono il normale svolgimento dell'erogazione di servizi e beni all'interno dell'Unione che danneggiano imprese e cittadini.
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of Schengen Information System in Cyprus (A9-0082/2022 - Peter Kofod)
Il Sistema Informazione Schengen (SIS) è una banca dati europea in cui sono segnalati oggetti rubati e persone ricercate dalla polizia a scopo di estradizione, colpite da un divieto d'entrata o scomparse.Il file oggetto di votazione e avente relatore del gruppo ID ha quindi per obiettivo di applicare a Cipro le disposizioni relative all'applicazione del sistema SIS. A norma dei trattati, il Consiglio adotta l'atto previa consultazione del Parlamento europeo ma senza essere tenuto a seguire il suo parere.Le valutazioni svolte dalla Commissione a Cipro hanno confermato che le autorità cipriote hanno soddisfatto pienamente le condizioni necessarie per l'applicazione dell'acquis di Schengen in materia di protezione dei dati personali. A giusto titolo, il relatore osserva che a fronte del forte afflusso di migranti irregolari nel paese è fondamentale che le autorità cipriote possano verificare le informazioni presenti nel SIS.In conclusione, si ritiene che offrendo alle autorità cipriote la possibilità di inserire e consultare le segnalazioni relative a individui o oggetti nel SIS, si garantiranno livelli più elevati di sicurezza pubblica in tutta l'Unione. Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU strategy to promote education for children in the world (A9-0058/2022 - David Lega)
La relazione affronta le varie problematiche connesse tra l'educazione scolastica dei bambini nel mondo e le conseguenze della pandemia Covid. Si sottolinea che l'educazione scolastica è alla base della vita dei bambini sotto tutti punti di vista (sociale, alimentare, educativo) e che con la pandemia alcuni Paesi hanno incontrato una serie di difficoltà. Inoltre si specifica che l'istruzione non deve essere discriminatoria, soprattutto nei confronti delle bambine/ragazze.Si chiede un impegno all'UE affinché sostenga le autorità di paesi terzi nel garantire che tutti i bambini possano godere del loro diritto all'istruzione primaria e agire per garantire che l'istruzione secondaria sia disponibile e accessibile e invita inoltre la Commissione, il SEAE e gli Stati membri a sostenere le autorità dei paesi terzi nello sviluppo e nell'attuazione di metodi di insegnamento e apprendimento digitali e ad agevolare l'accesso a Internet per tutti. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Strengthening Europol’s mandate: cooperation with private parties, processing of personal data, and support for research and innovation (A9-0290/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos)
Il 9 dicembre 2020 la Commissione europea, ha presentato la proposta di regolamento per quanto riguarda la cooperazione di Europol con le parti private, il trattamento dei dati personali da parte di Europol a sostegno di indagini penali e il ruolo di Europol in materia di ricerca e innovazione. Risulta opportuno che il mandato di Europol possa essere esteso affinché l'agenzia possa fornire sostegno agli Stati membri per quanto riguarda l'analisi di serie di dati ampie e complesse, oltre che sviluppare nuove tecnologie ai fini delle attività di contrasto. Sono altresì auspicabili tutte le iniziative che mirano a velocizzare e incrementare lo scambio d'informazioni tra autorità giudiziarie al fine di prevenire o contrastare il crimine. Tuttavia, l'ingente incremento di risorse umane e finanziarie, l'accrescimento dei poteri discrezionali dell'Agenzia e la collaborazione con una istituzione dalla, quantomeno dubbia utilità, come la Procura europea, hanno suscitato qualche perplessità durante la fase di negoziato. Ciò nonostante, gli aspetti legati alla sicurezza e alla cooperazione giudiziaria, sono da considerare prevalenti per contrastare fenomeni criminali sempre più transnazionali e in cui la velocità di circolazione delle informazioni tra autorità diventa essenziale.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Distortive foreign subsidies (A9-0135/2022 - Christophe Hansen)
Il nuovo strumento per affrontare gli effetti distorsivi delle sovvenzioni estere nel mercato unico, dovrebbe colmare la lacuna normativa esistente in tale ambito per cui le sovvenzioni concesse da governi di Paesi terzi attualmente, sono ampiamente incontrollate, a differenza di quelle concesse dagli Stati membri che sono soggette a un attento esame. Questo strumento entra a far parte degli strumenti di difesa di cui l'UE si sta dotando, soprattutto negli ultimi anni, per fare fronte a pratiche sleali provenienti da alcuni Paesi in particolare, ma che per ragioni di compatibilità con l'Organizzazione Mondiale del Commercio (OMC) non possono assumere un carattere geografico e quindi discriminatorio. La proposta prevede tre diversi strumenti di controllo delle sovvenzioni estere: due strumenti ex ante, previa notifica, per quanto riguarda le concentrazioni e gli appalti pubblici al di sopra delle soglie prestabilite, che nella posizione del Parlamento vengono abbassate in maniera proporzionale rispettivamente a 400 milioni e 200 milioni, e uno strumento di controllo ex officio anche su acquisizioni e appalti sotto delle soglie.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Transitional rules for the packaging and labelling of veterinary medicinal products (C9-0054/2022)
La direttiva 2001/82/CE e il regolamento 726/2004, hanno disciplinato i medicinali veterinari. Dal 28 gennaio 2022, il regolamento 2019/8 è subentrato e questo nuovo regolamento implica dei cambiamenti per l'etichettatura e l'imballaggio, come ad esempio la semplificazione dell'etichettatura esterna e immediata, per ridurre la necessità di un testo tradotto, il che facilita l'etichettatura/disponibilità multilingue e sottolinea l'importanza di leggere il foglietto illustrativo: per esempio non è più necessario includere informazioni sullo smaltimento, queste, vanno nel foglietto illustrativo. Sfortunatamente, le aziende e le autorità nazionali competenti non sono state in grado di rispettare le disposizioni e di rilasciare nuove versioni di etichette e imballaggi (alias varianti) in tempo utile. Di conseguenza, i prodotti non conformi non dovrebbero essere immessi sul mercato, che potrebbe portare a carenze di farmaci veterinari. Così la Commissione ha proposto un periodo di transizione di 5 anni, necessario, sia per i titolari delle autorizzazioni all'immissione in commercio che per le autorità competenti, per controllare le variazioni delle autorizzazioni all'immissione in commercio. Il Consiglio ha proposto un emendamento per coprire anche i VMP omeopatici (semplicemente registrati, non autorizzati), importante per le aziende italiane e in tutta l'UE per i veterinari.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Impact of Russian illegal war of aggression against Ukraine on the EU transport and tourism sectors (B9-0223/2022)
La risoluzione prende in considerazione gli impatti della guerra in Ucraina sui settori dei trasporti e del turismo. Il testo, nel condannare l'aggressione russa in Ucraina e accogliere favorevolmente il meccanismo di sanzioni adottato dall'UE, prende atto delle conseguenze economiche negative che impatteranno anche sui nostri sistemi produttivi e della necessità di porre in essere misure compensative e di diversificazione. Importanti il riferimento al settore del turismo e la richiesta di sostenere finanziariamente le imprese, anche con meccanismi di agevolazione fiscale. Pur contenendo alcuni aspetti eccessivamente enfatizzati, come il continuo richiamo alla mobilità verde, nel complesso prende in considerazione aspetti rilevanti per i trasporti legati al contesto della guerra per ciascuna modalità di trasporto: marittimo, aviazione, ferroviario, stradale, TEN-T e mobilità militare, aumento dei prezzi nei trasporti, turismo.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Negotiations for a cooperation agreement between the EU and Interpol (A9-0200/2022 - Jadwiga Wiśniewska)
Il testo oggetto di votazione raccoglie le raccomandazioni del Parlamento europeo al Consiglio e alla Commissione in merito ai negoziati relativi ad un accordo di cooperazione tra Unione europea e Interpol (l'Organizzazione internazionale della polizia criminale).In effetti, sulla base del mandato del Consiglio del 19 giugno 2021, la Commissione ha avviato le trattative per un accordo di cooperazione con l'Interpol ai fini della lotta al terrorismo e alla criminalità organizzata basato sul rafforzamento della cooperazione e dello scambio di informazioni.Come evidenziato da diverse indagini penali condotte durante gli ultimi anni, il terrorismo e i reati gravi hanno sempre più spesso una dimensione transfrontaliera. Tale fenomeno richiede una cooperazione più strutturata ed efficace con gli organismi internazionali, come Interpol, che possono fungere da ponte tra l'UE e i servizi di contrasto internazionali.Un altro aspetto largamente trattato nella relazione riguarda l'esigenza di incrementare la trasparenza attraverso la quale opera Interpol poiché diverse indagini hanno evidenziato abusi del sistema di allerte dell'Interpol da parte di alcuni Stati al fine di perseguitare oppositori politici in violazione agli standard internazionali sui diritti umani e alle stesse regole interne dell'Interpol.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Indo-Pacific strategy in the area of trade and investment (A9-0170/2022 - Jan Zahradil)
La relazione mira a delineare le future relazioni di commercio e investimenti tra l'UE e la regione dell'Indo-Pacifico, in quanto regionemolto importante e con grande valenza a livello geostrategico.Il testo è bilanciato e prevale in senso positivo la critica forte ai atteggiamenti della Cina nello scenario dell'Indo-Pacifico. Ho espresso voto positivo.
EU-India future trade and investment cooperation (A9-0193/2022 - Geert Bourgeois)
La relazione mira a delineare le future relazioni di commercio e investimenti tra l'UE e l'India, considerando che nel maggio 2021 sono stati rilanciati i negoziati per un accordo commerciale, dopo un blocco durato più di 10 anni, il cui obiettivo è approfondire i legami economici, creando condizioni di parità e un ambiente normativo e imprenditoriale favorevole a generare benefici per entrambe le parti.Parallelamente, sono stati avviati i negoziati per un accordo sugli investimenti separato che garantisca certezza normativa per gli investitori e che permetta maggiori investimenti da entrambe le parti e un accordo sulle indicazioni geografiche, il quale rappresenta una priorità per l'UE al fine di garantire la protezione e la promozione di una lista comprensiva di denominazioni che rappresentano le nostre eccellenze. Ho espresso voto positivo
Mental health in the digital world of work (A9-0184/2022 - Maria Walsh)
La relazione evidenzia la necessità di una strategia globale dell'UE sulla salute mentale. La mancanza di servizi di salute mentale efficienti, di sostegno e investimenti negli Stati membri ha condotto infatti all'ampia diffusione di problemi di salute mentale e a tassi di suicidi allarmanti nel corso dei decenni. Anche prima della pandemia di COVID-19, il numero di cittadini affetti da problemi mentali era preoccupante.Nel testo vengono affrontati temi quali il diritto alla disconnessione, il telelavoro e l'automazione, ponendo sufficientemente in rilievo la competenza nazionale in materia. Ho espresso voto positivo.
Addressing food security in developing countries (A9-0195/2022 - Beata Kempa)
Il testo affronta varie tematiche tra cui, la sicurezza alimentare e nutrizione, al centro della ripresa post-COVID-19, la costruzione della resilienza agli shock futuri e una risposta complementare dell'UE, alla politica umanitaria e di sviluppo. I conflitti, gli shock socio-economici e le catastrofi naturali, sono i principali fattori di crisi alimentare e creano fragilità, aggravata da tendenze a lungo termine, come il degrado delle risorse naturali, il cambiamento climatico e la demografia: occorre integrare il nesso umanitario-sviluppo-pace, essenziale per ridurre i rischi di crisi e gestirne gli effetti. Diversi i riferimenti alle conseguenze della guerra in Ucraina nel settore. L'obiettivo del rapporto è fornire raccomandazioni politiche generali senza discutere di crisi particolari, sebbene sia opportuno ribadire che sia le strategie nutrizionali, che le risposte alle crisi alimentari, dovrebbero sempre essere specifiche del contesto e adattate alle circostanze locali.L'attenzione dell'UE sugli investimenti nelle donne e nei piccoli agricoltori, continua ad essere rilevante: aumentare i redditi dei piccoli proprietari e migliorare l'occupazione nelle zone rurali, è un modo efficace per combattere la povertà e sostiene la resilienza di quelle comunità. È essenziale sostenere un migliore accesso ai mercati, alle risorse produttive, alla finanza e alle assicurazioni.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Temporary measures concerning driver documents issued by Ukraine (C9-0201/2022)
Il contesto attuale, non consente all'Ucraina il normale svolgimento delle proprie attività e fintantoché proseguirà la guerra, ottenere un permesso di guida internazionale rilasciato dagli organi ucraini competenti, sarà quasi impossibile per i titolari di patenti di guida ucraine. Si propone dunque che gli Stati membri riconoscano, fintanto che perdura il periodo di protezione temporanea, le decisioni di rinnovo di documenti di guida scaduti o che scadranno eventualmente adottate o da adottarsi da parte dell'Ucraina. Considerazioni analoghe valgono per i certificati di idoneità professionale (CPC) dei conducenti di autobus e di autocarri. Le circostanze della fuga dalla guerra fanno spesso sì che importanti documenti, quali le patenti di guida o i certificati di idoneità professionale, vengano smarriti o sottratti, oppure lasciati nella zona di guerra, da dove non possono essere recuperati nell'immediato. In tali casi, previa verifica, ad esempio nel registro nazionale elettronico delle patenti di guida dell'Ucraina, gli Stati membri dovrebbero essere in grado di rilasciare patenti temporanee che sostituiscano quelle originali per la durata della protezione temporanea.Ho espresso voto a favore della procedura d'urgenza e della proposta legislativa.
Exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (C9-0221/2022)
Dopo aver proposto 1,2 miliardi di euro in due tranche, il 24 gennaio 2022 e dopo aver concesso una liberalizzazione temporanea del commercio, il 1° luglio, la Commissione ha proposto su richiesta del Consiglio europeo, un nuovo pacchetto di assistenza macro-finanziaria di 1 miliardo di euro in forma di prestito a lungo termine, con tasso notevolmente agevolato, come prima parte di un pacchetto di 9 miliardi di euro annunciato il 18 maggio dalla Commissione durante il lancio del programma di ricostruzione dell'Ucraina.Ho espresso voto positivo.
Written questions (130)
Uncontrolled proliferation of the brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) affecting crops in northern Italy
Turkey's advance in Syria: what action will the Commission take to ward off the migration fall-out and escape of imprisoned terrorists?
Need for Commission inquiry and scrutiny regarding the arrest of three migrants on disembarkation from Sea Watch 3
Ban on lead
Banning of lead in wetlands
Use of European Solidarity Fund and bad weather in Piedmont
The need for an intervention to manage the refugee crisis
Swift mobilisation of the EUSF – damage caused by bad weather in Italy
Disastrous flooding in Venice: urgent EU action required through deployment of the European Solidarity Fund and special funds
EU investigation into the acquisition of British Steel by the Chinese steel maker Jingye
Indication of the origin of primary ingredients according to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775, with reference to labelling of organic products
Good practices of Lombardy Regional Government regarding supply of live decoys
Repression in Iran
Detention of Iranian activist and Sakharov Prize winner Nasrin Sotoudeh
Request for clarification on the dynamics of the shipping accident in the Black Sea and on the methods used to transport the animals which died
Nutri-score vs top-quality national products
Request for action to deal with the African swine fever epidemic
Imposition of US trade tariffs in connection with the Airbus dispute
Eat ORIGINal! Unmask your food!
Failure to suspend the zero-duty import regime for rice from Cambodia
Consultation of Parliament on future decisions concerning the multiannual plan for small pelagic fisheries in the Adriatic Sea
Foibe massacres – importance of European remembrance and the need to preserve it
Infringement of human rights of European citizens sentenced in other jurisdictions
EU commitment to remembering the Vajont disaster
European commitment to projects to exploit water reserves
The Commission’s competence in regard to the ban on lead in ammunition for hunting and shooting sports
Suspension of flights to and from Italy following coronavirus cases
Amendments to the ESM system: Suspension of the ratification procedure
Blackmailing demands by Turkey
Request for Commission intervention in the revision of the Annexes to the Habitat Directive in order to address the problem of large predators.
European commitment to economic recovery in the Member States following the Covid-19 emergency
Coronavirus outbreak: Commission investigation into lab-based virus research methods
Implementation of a comprehensive system to monitor epidemics
Masks intended for Italy blocked by France
Reshaping the EU-China relations framework
Revision of European food strategies in view of the COVID-19 emergency
Proposed EU-wide ban on the use of lead shot over wetlands
Impact of coronavirus in relation to the front of packaging and the packaging of foodstuffs
Attention for medical staff in the planning of measures against pandemics
Management and processing of plastic waste
Stopping the development of infrastructure prejudicial to biodiversity in the EU
Political influence on government members of the NADEG technical group regarding the proposed lead shot ban over wetlands under REACH.
Commission measures to protect and rebuild the tourism industry
Consumers and airlines
EU funding of Palestinian organisations
Surrogacy in Ukraine
Identification of asbestos-based inert waste storage sites
New rules for the car distribution sector: concern about risk of distortion causing possible harm to both SMEs and consumers
Proof of receipt of proposals concerning unilateral changes to consumer contracts
Casimirri – the Italian terrorist hiding in Nicaragua
Obligation to indicate place of provenance of pork
Protection of European protected designation of origin (PDO) products
Exceptional exemptions from rules concerning separate waste collection
Request for clarification on the role of hunting in Directive 2009/147/EC (Birds Directive)
European funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology
Child exploitation in cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Turkey is attacking Kurds and training jihadists for war in Artsakh
The militarised educational and training system in Tibet
Request for action to address the problem of the hybridisation of wolves and domestic dogs in the Member States
Banning of the Grey Wolves organisation
The detention of Nasibe Semsai and Turkey’s migration policies towards totalitarian regimes
Safeguarding Armenian Christian cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
Upgrading electricity interconnection networks
Interpretation of the term ‘beverages’
Call for action to deal with problems relating to the transport of live pigs within Europe
Concessions of state-owned property regarding beaches and beach facilities – call on the Commission to withdraw its infringement proceedings against Italy
Identifying the primary ingredient of beer
Immediate release of Iranian lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh
Ban on imports of waste into China
Combating the online sale within the EU of banned items that cause animal suffering
Reverse engineering and discrimination of a whistleblower in respect of alleged wrongdoings by Huawei
European digital sovereignty and 5G geopolitics
Use of biodegradable bags for urban waste collections
Poor quality telephone services in remote areas
Controlling opportunistic predatory species within Member States to protect vulnerable species
Measures to protect children on the internet
Proposal concerning a European plan to combat cancer is likely to penalise ‘Made in Italy’ products
Access for the Republic of San Marino to the procurement mechanism for medicines and vaccines
EU-China relations and the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment
Further restrictions on the free movement of commercial vehicles in transit through Austria and Germany
Protection of Italian balsamic vinegar label
Association agreements between the EU and Andorra, Monaco and San Marino
Support for landfill mining
Novel foods: dehusked Digitaria exilis grains
Exportation of EU-produced vaccines outside the Union
Plastic materials and items intended to come into contact with food
Halting the use of virgin wood biomass in energy production
Request for an opinion on increasing the bluefin tuna quotas for recreational fishing
Prepacked foods offered for sale by means of distance communication
New post for Carles Esteva Mosso, in light of the sliding doors phenomenon
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Protection of classical culture on which Europe is based
Rise in arrivals of irregular migrants in Italy and resumption of negotiations on the Malta agreements
Request for an opinion on the adoption of measures to directly deter large carnivores
Raw materials crisis and recovery
Request for action to protect migratory birds outside Europe
Investment by EU citizens in Kosovo: the Agrokosova case
Flooding in the province of Como
Protecting the producers of coloured Murano glass
REACT-EU programme and funding for research to reduce the costs of beef cultivation
Call for action on behalf of the road haulage sector, threatened by a shortage of the additive AdBlue
Building materials neutrality principle
Call to change the rules of the automotive sector
20 years of China at the WTO and energy transition risks
Delays in the automotive sector and microchip shortages
Increased energy costs
Retroactive measures in the Renewable Energy Directive
Request for an opinion on the establishing of water accumulation reservoirs
Request for information to protect and promote the agri-food sector
Call for balance with regard to biosecurity in European agri-food production
Proposal to extend the Nutriscore system to include alcoholic beverages
Use of the ‘sodium free’ claim for beverages
Potential adverse effects on meat and charcuterie products of the review of the EU's agri-food promotion policy
Call for immediate action regarding price rises for energy and basic foodstuffs
Call for intervention regarding a landfill authorisation in the municipality of Magliano Romano (Lazio)
EU initiatives to protect Ukrainian citizens with disabilities
Request for guidelines on carrying out damming works in EU floodplains and river basins
Protection of PDO cheeses from mandatory use of the Nutriscore logo
Request for guidance from the EU to support Member States in the recovery, rearing and selling of indigenous livestock breeds
Online food sales
COVID in China: alarm over the severe lockdown imposed within the country
Call for extraordinary economic measures against the African swine fever outbreak to support EU Member States
Recent cases of hepatitis
Measures to reduce energy dependency
Technological independence and enhanced cybersecurity
Role of local associations and local authorities in the implementation of agri-environmental measures under the next CAP (2023-2027)
Request for an opinion on including poultry meat under the measures to combat deforestation
Request for clarification regarding user privacy on the TikTok platform
Controlling legionella outbreaks and the treatment of drinking water
‘Uber file’ revelations about ‘revolving doors’ in the EU institutions
Individual motions (6)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on support for the Israel-Palestine Peace Plan
PROPOSTA DI RISOLUZIONE sullꞌemergenza relativa allꞌepidemia di 2019-nCoV
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on establishing a Europe-wide ‘Remembrance Day’ to commemorate the victims of the foibe massacres
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the organisation of events to commemorate, across Europe, the 700th anniversary of the death of Dante Alighieri
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the protection of persons with disabilities
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reducing the impact on farm land of ground-based photovoltaic plants
Amendments (801)
Amendment 37 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Europe finds itself in a momentis going through a period of ecological, digital and social transition, which is being accelerated by the economic and social impact of COVID- 19 and geopolitical tensions linked to the war on Ukraine in a context of rincreasing populism and anti-European sentimentlitical apathy and a decreasing spirit of analysis;
Amendment 44 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU has been respondingis trying to respond effectively to the challenges of environmental degradation, climate change and the increasing scarcity of natural resources with far-reaching and ambitious political endeavours such as the European Green Deal, which is driving theabout to start on its quest for renewal and innovation;
Amendment 52 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas culture is a strategic sector for the EU which helps to bolster its economy, to enable us to live better together among ourselves and with other peoples and to build democratic and free societies, and yet unfortunately has been one of the areas hardest hit by the measures put in place to address the pandemic;
Amendment 68 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas architecture, urban and territorial planning, design, the arts, sociology and engineering are complementary and instrumental for building an inclusive societycan work effectively to become complementary and possibly also important for building an inclusive society with a higher rate of widespread well-being;
Amendment 78 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas building a better futurefuture in the medium and long term that enables all citizens to live a life of greater well-being starts with quality basic education and continues with affordable and effective ongoing professional training; whereas access to quality education is a fundamental right for all citizens;
Amendment 94 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas cultural heritage is increasingly impacted by climate and social change, and environmental and cultural degradation;
Amendment 116 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the historic Bauhaus movement createdontributed to creating a paradigm shift in design, architecture and the arts which delivered radical innovationincorporated elements of radical innovation into the context of the moment and reflected truesignificant cultural and social changes in a progressiven artistic and educational context that aimed to achieve socio-economic progress;
Amendment 132 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative and emphasises that it must primarily focus on improving the quality of people’s lives by transformingrationalising, where added value can be achieved and where there are no factors preventing its implementation, the spaces, buildings, cities and territories in which they live;
Amendment 146 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises the NEB as a creativeneed for the NEB to be a creative, efficient and interdisciplinary initiative which brings together architecture, design, the arts and science at the forefront of EU policies for the first time, making the European Green Deal a tangible, positive and inclusive experience for alln experience that is tangible, positive from all points of view and inclusive for citizens and businesses;
Amendment 159 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reaffirmcalls that the NEB has the potential to rebetter shape the way policies are conceived and to define a range of scenarios for the environment of the future by meeting the need for spaces also adapted to new ways of life;
Amendment 169 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the NEB must be accessible, affordable and profitable, socially fair and inclusive and must make it possible to actively involve EU citizens and community-based organisations in a bottom-up way – from project design to roll-out and evaluation – while avoiding any elitist approachethus ensuring the active participation of local authorities and small territories while avoiding any elitist approaches and inefficiency across the entire process;
Amendment 184 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that this innovative cultural movement has the potentialambition to position Europe as among the global frontrunners in the area of architecture, design, culture, technology and energy efficiency by promoting ways of living better together with sustainable costs both in the purchase phase and over the life cycle of the dwelling, which can also be applied beyond the EU;
Amendment 210 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to raise awarenesstudy these opportunities more and more in order to improve their effective application, spread information and raise awareness among citizens and businesses about this initiative and to improve the coordination between all levels of governance, which should have equitable access to opportunities and funding;
Amendment 223 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Urges the Commission to develop and implement specific initiatives aimed at providing technical assistance to small municipalities that do not have the necessary capacity or expertise to implement their own projects related to the new Bauhaus initiative;
Amendment 233 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – introductory part
Paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Requests that the Commission clarify the general criteria for the selection and ongoing evaluation of the projects that will be on the list of NEB projects and for the allocation of funds, in particular:
Amendment 244 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 3
Paragraph 8 – indent 3
- creating new jobs and business opportunities, which are both stable and of significant economic value;
Amendment 251 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 4
Paragraph 8 – indent 4
- securing accessibility, medium to long-term sustainability and affordability;
Amendment 261 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 6
Paragraph 8 – indent 6
- involving the cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI), particularly small and medium-sized cultural enterprises, including cultural creators;
Amendment 265 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 7
Paragraph 8 – indent 7
- linking the NEB to the indicators of the 2030 Agenda and core European valuesvalues of our society;
Amendment 268 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new)
- the creation of net economic value within the local areas where the project is implemented:
Amendment 281 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to make the principles of the NEB an integral part of allthe relevant future legislation that it considers will benefit from these principles;
Amendment 284 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls, in addition, for specific criteria to be developed for the relevant sectors, in particular construction and architecture, energy, mobility, design, tourism, education and skills, crafts, and the arts, and calls for these criteria to be reviewed regularly to ensure the continued effectiveness they are required to provide through their application in the sectors identified;
Amendment 301 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets the lack of clarity on funding for the NEB from 2023 onwards; calls for the Horizon Europe Regulation to be amendeddiscussed again during the mid-term revision of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in ordto determine whether to create an NEB mission funded with EUR 500 million; underlines thatand, where necessary, how it should be funded; asks the Commission to analyse whether the programme shouldmust also be supported by other relevant programmes in ordercase it is necessary to generate additional impact;
Amendment 306 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to table a proposal as soon as possible to make the NEB, within a scale of priorities redefined also by factors external to the planned project, to determine whether the NEB should be an EU programme by the next MFF; insists that, if it is necessary, this will require freshinancial resources with a dedicated and stable budget line; underlines that this new programme must not reduce funding for other programmes nor divert focus from their agreed political priorities and those that emerge along the way as a result of external factors;
Amendment 322 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to develop a clear, effective and efficient plan for attracting public and private investment; encourages the Member States to allocate what they consider to be adequate funding to the NEB through their recovery and resilience plans and the European structural and investment funds;
Amendment 330 #
2021/2255(INI)
14. Calls on the Commission to set up an evidence-based monitoring and evaluation mechanism that is constantly updated, including at the request of citizens, which should continuously review all NEB activities and report regularly to Parliament and the Council; expects to receive the first monitoring report in 2022;
Amendment 344 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the NEB movement should promote moreesent more financially sustainable, socially inclusive and innovativeefficient ways of life based on new models of planning, constructing and inhabiting our built environment in order to suit emergingcurrent needs and help to ensure decentcomfortable housing for all;
Amendment 366 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to draw up innovative educationaltraining curricula for the development of spatial skills and to integrate green and digital skills within higher education and lifelong learning, which will also help to deliverround off the European Skills Agenda; calls for the EU to promoteesent the effectiveness and efficiency of such endeavours; calls on the Commission to makepresent mobility opportunities an integrs an additional part of the NEB;
Amendment 379 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Member States and the Commission to integrate all aspects of the knowledge triangle – innovation, research and education – by promoting partnerships between universities, scientific secondary schools, research organisations and industry, including the relevant small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs), in close cooperation with the European Institute of Innovation and Technology and the Joint Research Centre;
Amendment 385 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Highlights that the NEB could support energy security and efficiency by encouraging investment and incentivising low-tech, low-energy solusolutions that reflect an efficient use of raw materials and efficient energy consumptions and could facilitatesupport the digital transition by improving connectivity to mitigate the digital divide; underlines the importance of effectively implementing in design practice the principles of the NEB in fighting energy poverty through innovativeeffective and efficient solutions for the building, construction, industrial and materials sectors;
Amendment 402 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to usinclude the NEB in programmes to better protecteserve Europe’s rich and historic cultural heritage from the impact of various external factors, such as climate change;
Amendment 423 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to effectively connect the NEB to the Renovation Wave, taking advantage of the innovativebest solutions that the project offers in the comprehensive renovation of our building stock, including with regard to energy efficiency;
Amendment 431 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the Commission to consider the NEB as an opportunity for the re-use, development and safeguarding of buildings, villages and historic centres;
Amendment 438 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Supports the possible creation of an NEB label based on clear criteria applied in an inclusive and effective way in order to recognise projects and products for achieving key NEB goals and help them get access to funding; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding schemes create incentives to apply for the label; calls for market uptake of the label to be explorea careful exploration, including presentation of the figures to all stakeholders, of the scenarios to which uptake of the label in the different markets inside and outside the Union could lead;
Amendment 453 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights that the NEB shcould embracealso draw on the potential of the CCSI, particularly small and medium-sized cultural enterprises, including cultural creators, as drivepossible contributors tof economic growth and innovative, high- quality services and products;
Amendment 470 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for the future NEB lab to make innovative recommendationsissue effective and efficient guidance, to collaborate with other institutions, national and regional governments, with local bodies and stakeholders and to establish clear operating and reporting rules in line with the initiative and rules on possible responses if projects are not in line with the comprehensive sustainability principles laid down;
Amendment 483 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to create a publicly accessible database of NEB projects, that is regularly updated, with clear data demonstrating the impact of the initiatives on the regions, to make the results of the initiative more visible and to further develop the NEB based on best practices;
Amendment 490 #
2021/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls for the communication efforts of the NEB to be enhanced in order to stimulate EU citizens’ knowledge of and interest provide opportunities to EU citizens and businesses concerning the initiative, in particular through participatory public and private-sector outreach activities and a platform providing information, best practices and educationaltraining content;
Amendment 9 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for effective, efficient, sustainable and ambitious policies to reduce emissions and transport’s reliance on fossil fuels without delay; as soon as possible; is of the view that in order to achieve the objective of eliminating dependence on fossil fuels in the long term, a step-by-step programme of intermediate targets should be set, based on the principle of technology neutrality, and that new technologies should be assessed by means of an inclusive life- cycle assessment;
Amendment 15 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Takes the view that when deciding on smart and sustainable mobility, due consideration should be given to the competitiveness of the European industrial sector involved in mobility and the protection of jobs and of the know- how developed by the various industries;
Amendment 19 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the challenges ahead are also an opportunity for themain motive for the challenges ahead is Union industrial leadership also in clean technologies such as batteries or, hydrogen, advanced fuels, natural gas for traction, as well as in the related industrial ecosystems; welcomes the new European partnerships under Horizon Europe related to mobilityplaces great emphasis on a goal that must never be secondary, namely that of providing all EU citizens with mobility solutions that are affordable for all, that are geared towards the inclusion of all social groups and that do not in any way increase the differences in opportunities between more affluent people and those having greater financial difficulties; welcomes the new European partnerships under Horizon Europe related to mobility, in order to achieve technological sovereignty and have constant control over innovation in this area;
Amendment 27 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Is of the view that the adoption of new technological choices related to mobility should be an incentive for European businesses, and should not expose the EU to dangerous imports and technological dependence on third parties, thus limiting the EU's strategic autonomy;
Amendment 29 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that a mobility system based on EU-wide digitalisation, data sharing and interoperable standards has the potential to make transport smarter and cleaner; believes it is essential to maintain the structural components of transport infrastructure before pushing ahead with the supercharged digitisalisation of that infrastructure; considers it necessary, first of all, to greatly speed up the development of a super-fast internet network (5G and 6G) that is widespread and stable throughout Europe in order to have a mobility system that is truly digital and secure;
Amendment 54 #
2021/2046(INI)
4. Calls for a holistic approach based on technological neutrality to increase the share of renewable energy in the transport sector, where the further development and, deployment of electricand cost-efficiency of electric and fuel cell vehicles should play a keyn enabling role;
Amendment 60 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Member States to implement the Clean Energy Packagemonitor the state of the art of the Clean Energy Package and implement it, where necessary, in order to facilitate the production and management of the increased renewable electricity neethat is important in ordedr to decarbonismake the transport sector more sustainable;
Amendment 69 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for measures to unlock the potential of the energy efficiency first principle by boosting opportunities from digitalisation and electrifnew mobility solutions; calls for life-cycle assessment (LCA) of products to be taken into account in all sustainable mobility applications;
Amendment 86 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the possibilities for advanced biofuels and synthetic fuels and their associated infrastructure development in the EU, such as options for the greater uptake of sustainable alternative fuels, in particular in the aviation and maritimeall mobility sectors, as part of the review of RED II;
Amendment 88 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to give due consideration to the world of natural gas (LPG and methane) for mobility traction purposes as a ready, effective and economically viable energy source that is suitable for completing the transition to environmentally sustainable energy sources; wishes to encourage the development of even more efficient and sustainable solutions for producing and using natural gas for traction purposes; calls for the continuation and, where necessary, implementation, of forms of economic and fiscal support for sustainable natural gas fuels;
Amendment 94 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for increased efforts to achieve a EU-wide roll-out of charging infrastructure and the adoption of harmonised standards to ensure interoperability.; calls for the EU-wide development of a commercial distribution network for hydrogen for traction purposes that is widespread and safe and for the adoption of harmonised standards to ensure interoperability; considers it vital to support the improvement of the natural gas distribution network for traction purposes;
Amendment 104 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Suggests - while waiting for technologies such as electricity and hydrogen to mature - that the adoption of already existing solutions and use of available industries be supported, since these nevertheless tend to lower emissions, especially in sectors having the most impact, such as maritime transport;
Amendment 107 #
2021/2046(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Is of the view that, in order to quantify the real impact of new smart and sustainable mobility solutions, certain choices cannot be prioritised without first having carried out a full life-cycle assessment of the technologies themselves, their impact and, above all, their emissions and how they are to be disposed of, where necessary.
Amendment 104 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) ‘Natural ecosystem degradation’ means changes within a natural ecosystem that significantly and negatively affect species composition, structure and/or function and reduce the ecosystem’s capacity to supply products, support biodiversity and/or provide ecosystem services.
Amendment 139 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) The ongoing climate crisis should be considered on a global scale and measures to improve the sustainability of production around the world should be a global objective. The application of this Regulation is likely to trigger worldwide distortive effects which could outweigh the, in any case, minor effects that the impact assessment predicts the Regulation will have. In that connection, the role of the World Trade Organization is crucial both to preventing distortion of that kind and to the coordination of efforts in every region in the world so that EU action can deliver the desired results.
Amendment 214 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) With a view to ensuring that the Regulation’s objectives are achieved, the impact on individual companies, particularly SMEs, should be minimised. The proposal for a regulation should provide for a derogation from its application for operators producing raw materials and the products concerned in those countries classified as ‘negligible risk’ and where forest area has gradually increased or remained unchanged over the years.
Amendment 260 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
The Regulation shall not apply to relevant commodities and products placed on the Union market that were produced before the date established in Article 36(1) and.
Amendment 261 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
(a) operators participating in certification schemes that ensure compliance with the sustainability and legality objectives set out in this Regulation, including voluntary schemes recognised by the Commission under Article 30(5) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
Amendment 274 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘deforestation’ means the conversion of forest to agricultural use, whether human-induced or not or for another use;
Amendment 304 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘forest degradation’ means management and harvesting operations that are not sustainable and cause a reduction or loss of the biological or economic productivity and complexity of forest ecosystems, resulting in the long- term reduction of the overall supply of benefits from forest, which includes wood, biodiversity and other products or services;
Amendment 339 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b a (new)
(ba) that the relevant goods and products, including those used or contained in relevant products, were produced on land whose ecosystem has not naturally degraded since 31 December 2020;
Amendment 351 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘negligible risk’ means a full assessment of both the product-specific and the general information on compliance with Articles 3(a) and 3(b) by relevant commodities or products showing no cause for concern, particularly where forest area has gradually increased or remained unchanged over the years;
Amendment 539 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. When placing relevant commodities or products on the Union market or exporting them from it, operators are not required to fulfil the obligations under Article 10 where they can ascertain that all relevant commodities and products have been produced in countries or parts thereof that were identified as low risk in accordance with Article 27 or where forest area has gradually increased or remained unchanged over the years.
Amendment 839 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. No later than fivetwo years after the entry into force and at least every five years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out a general review of this Regulation, and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The first of the reports shall include in particular, based on specific studies, an evaluation of:
Amendment 871 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. Articles 3 to 12, 14 to 22, 24, 29 and 30 shall apply 124 months from the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 875 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. Articles referred to paragraph 2 shall apply 2436 months from the entry into force of this Regulation for operators that are microenterprises53 established by December 31, 2020, except for products covered in the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 995/2010. __________________ 53 As defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC.
Amendment 95 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Commission’s Communication on the European Green Deal35 emphasised that Europe should leverage the potential of the digital transformation, which is considered a key enabler for reaching the Green Deal objectives. The Union should promote and invest in the necessary digital transformation as digital technologies are a critical enabler for attaining the sustainability goals of the Green Deal in many different sectors, always bearing in mind the effects, especially employment, of which this digital transformation will be the cause. Digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, 5G, cloud and edge computing and the internet of things can accelerate and maximise the impact of policies to deal with climate change and protect the environment, despite the repercussions on employment policies not yet estimated by the European institutions. Digitalisation also presents new opportunities for distance monitoring of air and water pollution, or for monitoring and optimising how energy and natural resources are used. Europe needs a digital sector that puts sustainability at its heart, ensuring that digital infrastructures and technologies become verifiably more sustainable and energy- and resource efficient, and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal. . _________________ 35 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “The European Green deal”, 11.12.2019, COM/2019/640 final.
Amendment 101 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The measures envisaged in the Digital Compass Communication should be implemented, to intensify actions defined in the strategy for Shaping Europe’s digital future, and building on existing Union instruments (such as Cohesion programmes, the Technical Support Instrument, Regulation (EU) 2021/694 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 , Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council37 and Regulation (EU) 2021/523 of the European Parliament and of the Council38 ) and on the funds allocated for digital transition of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 making use, where appropriate, of synergies between the Union and national funds. By this Decision, a Policy Programme “Path to the Digital Decade” should therefore be established in order to achieve, accelerate and shape a successful digital transformation of the Union’s economy and society. _________________ 36 Regulation (EU) 2021/694 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240 (OJ L 166, 11.5.2021, p. 1). 37 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 1). 38 Regulation (EU) 2021/523 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing the InvestEU Programme and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 ( OJ L 107, 26.3.2021, p. 30). 39 Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ L 57, 18.2.2021, p. 17).
Amendment 114 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Digital skills, basic and advanced, are essential to reinforce the collective resilience of the Union’s society. Digitally empowered and capable citizens will be able to take advantage of the opportunities of the Digital Decade. Moreover, digital training and education, through education and vocational training and retraining, should support a workforce in which people can acquire specialised digital skills to get quality jobs and rewarding careers in much greater numbers than today, with convergence between women and men. In addition, an essential enabler for taking advantage of the benefits of digitisation, for further technological developments and for Europe’s digital leadership is a sustainable digital infrastructure for connectivity, microelectronics and the ability to process vast data. Excellent and secure connectivity for everybody and everywhere in Europe including in rural and remote areas40 is needed. Societal needs for upload and download bandwidth are constantly growing increasing the investment gap needed to meet these requirements. By 2030, networks with gigabit speeds should become available at accessible conditions for all those who need or wish such capacity. Moreover, microprocessors which are already today at the start of most of the key, strategic value chains are expected to be in even higher demand in the future, in particular the most innovative ones. Climate neutral highly secure edge node guaranteeing access to data services with low latency wherever businesses are located and quantum capacity are also expected to be critical enablers. _________________ 40 Long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas. COM(2021) 345 final.
Amendment 130 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Democratic life and public services will also crucially depend on digital technologies and therefore they should be fully accessible for everyone, including vulnerable people or people in vulnerable areas, as a best–in- class digital environment providing for easy-to-use, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards.
Amendment 152 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The Commission should, together with Member States, develop projected trajectories for the Union to reach the digital targets as laid down in this Decision. These projected trajectories should then be translated by Member States into national trajectories, where possible. The different potential of Member States to contribute to the digital targets should be taken into account and reflected in national trajectories. These trajectories should help assess progress over time at Union and national level respectively and should take into account any negative effects produced along the process of achieving the digital goals.
Amendment 157 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Since spectrum is essential to achieve the digital targets, and in particular a secure, performant and sustainable digital infrastructure, Member States should also report on their adopted and future policies and measures regarding the availability and possibility to use radio spectrum for existing users and prospective investors and operators. Without prejudice to the possibility for the Commission to propose new strategic spectrum policy orientations or mechanisms under Article 4 (4) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council43 appropriate guidance could be provided by the Commission in that regard in order to meet the general objectives and digital targets laid down in this Decision. _________________ 43 Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (OJ L 321, 17.12.2018, p. 36).
Amendment 176 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Multi-Country Projects involving several Member States should allow for large-scale intervention in key areas necessary for the achievement of the digital targets, notably by pooling resources from the Union, Member States, and where appropriate private sources. They should be implemented in a coordinated manner, in close cooperation between the Commission and Member States. For that reason, the Commission should play a central role in accelerating the deployment of Multi-Country Projects through the identification of Multi- Country projects ready for implementation among the projects categories indicatively included in Annex, in advising Member States on the choice of implementation mechanism, on the choice of the sources of funding and their combination, on other strategic matters related to the implementation of those projects, and on the selection of a European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (EDIC) as an implementation mechanism, where appropriate.
Amendment 182 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) The Commission should be able to establish, upon Member States’ application, and where it considers it appropriate, in particular in the situations where there is no alternative suitable implementation mechanism, a European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (‘EDIC’) to implement that Multi-Country Project. This creation should take place without further burdening the budgets of the Member States.
Amendment 207 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) foster the retraining of Union citizens who will be affected by the digital transformation, guaranteeing them the opportunity to acquire and maintain new skills and competences in the digital sector;
Amendment 213 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ensure digital sovereignty notably by a secure and accessible digital infrastructure capable to process vast volumes of data that enables other technological developments, supporting the competitiveness of the Union's industry, in particular of SMEs;
Amendment 234 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ensure that digital infrastructures and technologies become more sustainable and energy- and resource efficient, and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal;
Amendment 245 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) facilitate fair and convergent conditions for investments in digital transformation throughout the Union, including by strengthening the synergies between the use of Union and national funds, and developing predictable regulatory approaches;
Amendment 271 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) at least 80% of those aged 16-74 have at least basic digital skills, including people who have started a retraining process;
Amendment 280 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) coverage of all European households are covered by a Gigabit network, with all populated areas covered by 5Gby an ultrafast gigabit network, by encouraging the deployment of combinations of hybrid and/or complementary technologies that are necessary to achieve global coverage, and in particular in rural and remote areas;
Amendment 289 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
(c) at least 10 000 climate neutral highly secure “edge nodes” are deployed in the Union, distributed in a way that guarantees reliable access to data services with low latency (few milliseconds) wherever businesses are located;
Amendment 302 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) more than 90% of Union Small and Medium Enterprises (‘SME’) reach at least a basic level of digital intensity, with particular attention to SMEs present in rural areas, often disadvantaged by the distance from urban areas;
Amendment 313 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) 100% online accessible provision of key public services for Union citizens and businesses that fully respect requisites in terms of security and confidentiality;
Amendment 317 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
(b) 100% of Union citizens have access to their medical records (electronic health records (EHR)) complying with confidentiality and data management requirements;
Amendment 326 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
(c) at least 80% of Union citizens use a secure digital identification (ID) solution.
Amendment 383 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission shall closely and continuously cooperate with private and public stakeholders, including social partners, to collect information and develop recommended policies, measures and actions for the purposes of the implementation of this Decision.
Amendment 386 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
(2) The Member States shall cooperate and consult with private and public stakeholders, including social partners, in line with the national legislation, when adopting their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and their adjustments.
Amendment 398 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) fostering the digital skills of Union citizens and workers through retraining in order to prepare them for the demands of the digital world of work;
Amendment 406 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5 a) Multi-country projects shall respect the principles of technology neutrality and sustainability in the allocation of funds and shall encourage the deployment of hybrid and/or complementary technology combinations to achieve the digital goals.
Amendment 42 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The European Green Deal5 establishes the objective of the Union becoming climate neutral in 2050 in a manner that contributes to the European economy, growth and job creation. That objective, and the objective of a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 as set out in the 2030 Climate Target Plan6 that was endorsed both by the European Parliament7 and by the European Council8, requires an energy transition and significantly higher shares of renewable energy sources in an integrated energy system. Those objectives can only be confirmed once an impact assessment has been carried out. _________________ 5Communication from the Commission COM(2019) 640 final of 11.12.2019, The European Green Deal. 6 Communication from the Commission COM(2020) 562 final of 17.9.2020, Stepping up Europeʼs 2030 climate ambition Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people 7 European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal (2019/2956(RSP)) 8European Council conclusions of 11 December 2020, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/47 296/1011-12-20-euco-conclusions-en.pdf
Amendment 51 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Renewable energy plays a fundamental role in delivering the European Green Deal and for achieving climate neutrality by 2050, given that the energy sector contributes over 75% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the Union. By reducing those greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy also contributes to tackling environmental-related challenges such as biodiversity loss. Member States must, however, be permitted to maintain the energy mix.
Amendment 65 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) There is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11, with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative, high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. When developing support schemes for bioenergy, Member States should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non- energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use, and the waste hierarchy established in Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council12. For this, they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs, veneer logs, stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood- based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bioenergy and 6) disposal. Where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate, energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. Member States’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors, and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity, in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways, as identified in the JRC report ‘The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU’13. On the other hand, in defining the further implications of the cascading principle, it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide Member States in the design of their support schemes Waste prevention, reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. Member States should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. Moreover, in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy, from 2026 on Member States should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storage. _________________ 11The cascading principle aims to achieve resource efficiency of biomass use through prioritising biomass material use to energy use wherever possible, increasing thus the amount of biomass available within the system. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bioenergy and 6) disposal. 12 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3). 13 https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reposit ory/handle/JRC122719
Amendment 67 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) There is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11, with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative, high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. When developing support schemes for bioenergy, Member States should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non- energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use, and the waste hierarchy established in Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council12. For this, they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs, veneer logs, stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood- based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bioenergy and 6) disposal. Where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate, energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non-renewable sources. Member States’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors, and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity, in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways, as identified in the JRC report ‘The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU’13. On the other hand, in defining the further implications of the cascading principle, it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide Member States in the design of their support schemes Waste prevention, reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. Member States should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. Moreover, in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy, from 2026 on Member States should not give support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storage. _________________ 11The cascading principle aims to achieve resource efficiency of biomass use through prioritising biomass material use to energy use wherever possible, increasing thus the amount of biomass available within the system. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bioenergy and 6) disposal. 12 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3). 13 https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reposit ory/handle/JRC122719
Amendment 84 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Member States are starting from different places in terms of renewable energy use. Therefore, European targets should not be imposed, but instead objectives should be suggested that take account of what has already been done by different countries in this area. Member States’ cooperation to promote renewable energy can take the form of statistical transfers, support schemes or joint projects. It allows for a cost-efficient deployment of renewable energy across Europe and contributes to market integration. Despite its potential, cooperation has been very limited, thus leading to suboptimal results in terms of efficiency in increasing renewable energy. Member States should therefore be obliged to test cooperation through implementing a pilot project. Projects financed by national contributions under the Union renewable energy financing mechanism established by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/129414 would meet this obligation for the Member States involved. _________________ 14Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1294 of 15 September 2020 on the Union renewable energy financing mechanism (OJ L 303, 17.9.2020, p. 1).
Amendment 116 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) There is a growing recognition of the need for alignment of bioenergy policies with the cascading principle of biomass use11, with a view to ensuring fair access to the biomass raw material market for the development of innovative, high value-added bio-based solutions and a sustainable circular bioeconomy. When developing support schemes for bioenergy, Member States should therefore take into consideration the available sustainable supply of biomass for energy and non- energy uses and the maintenance of the national forest carbon sinks and ecosystems as well as the principles of the circular economy and the biomass cascading use, and the waste hierarchy established in Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council12 . For this, they should grant no support to the production of energy from saw logs, veener logs, stumps and roots and avoid promoting the use of quality roundwood for energy except in well-defined circumstances. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. Where no other use for woody biomass is economically viable or environmentally appropriate, energy recovery helps to reduce energy generation from non- renewable sources. Member States’ support schemes for bioenergy should therefore be directed to such feedstocks for which little market competition exists with the material sectors, and whose sourcing is considered positive for both climate and biodiversity, in order to avoid negative incentives for unsustainable bioenergy pathways, as identified in the JRC report ‘The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU’13. On the other hand, in defining the further implications of the cascading principle, it is necessary to recognise the national specificities which guide Member States in the design of their support schemes. Waste prevention, reuse and recycling of waste should be the priority option. Member States should avoid creating support schemes which would be counter to targets on treatment of waste and which would lead to the inefficient use of recyclable waste. Moreover, in order to ensure a more efficient use of bioenergy, from 2026 on Member States should not givemay grant support anymore to electricity-only plants , unless the installations are in regions with a specific use status as regards their transition away from fossil fuels or if the installations use carbon capture and storageprovided that specific sustainability and energy efficiency criteria are applied (at least 50% cogeneration, fuel from sustainable forest management at territorial level, installations with electrical capacity no higher than10 MW equipped with appropriate filtering systems). __________________ 11 The cascading principle aims to achieve resource efficiency of biomass use through prioritising biomass material use to energy use wherever possible, increasing thus the amount of biomass available within the system. In line with the cascading principle, woody biomass should be used according to its highest economic and environmental added value in the following order of priorities: 1) wood-based products, 2) extending their service life, 3) re-use, 4) recycling, 5) bio-energy and 6) disposal. 12 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3). 13 https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reposit ory/handle/JRC122719
Amendment 117 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand, for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes, electric vehicles for transport, or electric furnaces in certain industries. Renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuelsrenewable fuels of non-biological origin for consumption in hard-to- decarbonise transport sectors such as heavy duty transport including aviation and, maritime transport. A framework for electrification and electricity generation as well as industries that need high temperature heat. A framework for achieving climate neutrality needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time, stimulate investments in flexibility and storage, and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. Member States should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. For this, Member States should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricitnergy systems fit for a high level of renewable energy, as well as storage facilities, fully integrated into the electricitnergy system. In particular, this framework shall tackle remaining barriers, including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. for the full integration of non- programmable RES into the electricity system and for the decarbonisation process of the generation fleet by ensuring the availability of market instruments which provide long term price signals for investment decisions, including investments in system adequacy, stability and flexibility through competitive, transparent and non-discriminatory bidding process, which provide for a remuneration of the awarded recipients based on market prices. The framework shall also tackle non-financial barriers such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. In view of the above, and given that the target of 40% of energy from renewable sources to be achieved by 2030 is a very challenging and ambitious one, no effort should be spared to ensure that all renewable sources and all the technologies that use them to produce energy can be fully exploited and developed, including biomass in the heating and cooling sector and biofuels in the transport sector, provided that the limits and criteria laid down are met provided that the limits and criteria laid down in this Directive are respected.
Amendment 119 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricity production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand, for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low-temperature industrial processes, electric vehicles for transport, or electric furnaces in certain industries. Renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. A framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time, stimulate investments in flexibility, and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. Member States should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricity continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. For this, Member States should establish a framework that includes market-compatible mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity systems fit for a high level of renewable energy, as well as storage facilities, fully integrated into the electricity system. In particular, this framework shall tackle remaining barriers, including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications. In the light of the above, and considering that the target of 40% of energy from renewable sources by 2030 is very challenging and ambitious, no effort should be spared to ensure that all renewable sources and all the technologies that use them to produce energy can be fully exploited and developed, including biomass in the heating and cooling sector and biofuels in the transport sector, provided that the limits and criteria set out in this Directive are met.
Amendment 139 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The Offshore Renewable Energy Strategy introduces an ambitious objective of 300 GW of offshore wind and 40 GW of ocean energy across all the Union’s sea basins by 2050. To ensure this step change, Member States will need to work together across borders at sea-basin level. Member States should therefore jointly define the amount of offshore renewable generation to be deployed within each sea basin by 2050, with intermediate steps in 2030 and 2040. These objectives should be reflected in the updated national energy and climate plans that will be submitted in 2023 and 2024 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. In defining the amount, Member States should take into account the offshore renewable energy potential of each sea basin, the technical and economic feasibility of the transmission grid infrastructure, environmental protection, climate adaptation and other uses of the sea, as well as the Union’s decarbonisation targets. In addition, Member States should increasingly consider the possibility of combining offshore renewable energy generation withneed for an integrated planning in terms of RES and networks and the possibility of developing transmission lines interconnecting several Member States, in the form of hybrid projects or, at a later stage, a more meshed grid. This would allow electricity to flow in different directions, thus maximising socio- economic welfare, optimising infrastructure expenditure and enabling a more sustainable usage of the sea. The targets for each basin must be established in strong coordination with the electricity TSOs.
Amendment 142 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) To ensure higher environmental effectiveness of the Union sustainability and greenhouse emissions saving criteria for solid biomass fuels in installations producing heating, electricity and cooling, the minimum threshold for the applicability of such criteria should be lowered from the current 20 MW to 510 MW, starting in 2027.
Amendment 144 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Overly complex and excessively long administrative procedures constitute a major barrier for the deployment of renewable energy. Further streamlining of administrative and permitting procedures is needed to ease the administrative burden for both renewable energy projects and the related grid infrastructure projects. Member States shall define a minimum set of clear and general rules at EU level to ease and accelerate the national transposition processes, facilitate a homogeneous application throughout the EU of permitting procedures and ease the ex-post monitoring of the measures adopted by Member States from the Commission. These rules shall foresee an integrated or coordinated process for renewable energy plants and the transmission grid infrastructures which are essential for their integration in the energy system and simplified permitting procedures for projects which respect clearly defined criteria. On the basis of the measures to improve administrative procedures for renewable energy installations that Member States are to report on by 15 March 2023 in their first integrated national energy and climate progress reports pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council15 , the Commission should further assess whether the provisions included in this Directive to streamline these procedures have resulted in smooth and proportionate procedures. If that assessment reveals significant scope for improvement, the Commission should take appropriate measures to ensure Member States have streamlined and efficient administrative procedures in place. __________________ 15 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 150 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Buildings have a large untapped potential to contribute effectively to the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the Union. The decarbonisation of heating and cooling in this sector through an increased share in production and use of renewable energy will be needed to meet the ambition set in the Climate Target Plan to achieve the Union objective of climate neutrality. However, progress on the use of renewables for heating and cooling has been stagnant in the last decade, largely relying on increased use of biomass. Without the establishment of targets to increase the production and use of renewable energy in buildings, there will be no ability to track progress and identify bottlenecks in the uptake of renewables. Furthermore, the creation of targets will provide a long-term signal to investors, including for the period immediately after 2030. This will complement obligations related to energy efficiency and the energy performance of buildings. Therefore, indicative targets for the use of renewable energy in buildings should be set to guide and incentivise Member States’ efforts to exploit the potential of using and producing renewable energy in buildings through the most efficient technologies, encourage the development of and integration of technologies which produce renewable energy while providing certainty for investors and local level engagement. In defining this path, it is necessary to start from the analysis of the national real estate stock and its plant characteristics, in order to effectively define the roadmap towards the technological switch required by the integration of renewable energy. Any mandatory requirement must be reviewed against the background that emissions trading for buildings already guarantees the achievement of savings targets. ETS deliberately causes higher energy costs and leads to market-driven energy saving investments or switching to renewables. Double burdens for consumers through ETS and European regulatory law must be avoided.
Amendment 151 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 strengthened the bioenergy sustainability and greenhouse gas savings framework by setting criteria for all end-use sectors. It set out specific rules for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass, requiring the sustainability of harvesting operations and the accounting of land-use change emissions. To achieve an enhanced protection of especially biodiverse and carbon-rich habitats, such as primary forests, highly biodiverse forests, grasslands and peat lands, exclusions and limitations to source forest biomass from those areas should be introduced, in line with the approach for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural biomass. In addition, the greenhouse gas emission saving criteria should also apply to existing biomass-based installations to ensure that bioenergy production in all such installations leads to greenhouse gas emission reductions compared to energy produced from fossil fuels.
Amendment 153 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Buildings have a large untapped potential to contribute effectively to the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the Union. The decarbonisation of heating and cooling in this sector through an increased share in production and use of renewable energy will be needed to meet the ambition set in the Climate Target Plan to achieve the Union objective of climate neutrality. However, progress on the use of renewables for heating and cooling has been stagnant in the last decade, largely relying on increased use of biomass. Without the establishment of targets to increase the production and use of renewable energy in buildings, there will be no ability to track progress and identify bottlenecks in the uptake of renewables. Furthermore, the creation of targets will provide a long-term signal to investors, including for the period immediately after 2030. This will complement obligations related to energy efficiency and the energy performance of buildings. Therefore, indicative targets for the use of renewable energy in buildings should be set to guide and incentivise Member States’ efforts to exploit the potential of using and producing renewable energy in buildings, encourage the development of and integration of technologies which produce renewable energy while providing certainty for investors and local level engagement.
Amendment 160 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to reduce the administrative burden for producers of renewable fuels and recycled carbon fuels and for Member States, where voluntary or national schemes have been recognised by the Commission through an implementing act as giving evidence or providing accurate data regarding the compliance with sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria as well as other requirements set in this Directive, Member States should accept the results of the certification issued by such schemes within the scope of the Commission’s recognition. In order to reduce the burden on small installations, Member States should establish a simplified verification mechanism, starting from 2027, for installations of between 510 and 120MW.
Amendment 161 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Insufficient numbers of skilled workers, in particular installers and designers of renewable heating and cooling systems, slow down the replacement of fossil fuel heating systems by renewable energy based systems and is a major barrier to integrating renewables in buildings, industry and agriculture. Member States should cooperate with social partners and renewable energy communities to anticipate the skills that will be needed. A sufficient number of high-quality training programmes and certification possibilities ensuring proper installation and reliable operation of a wide range of renewable heating and cooling systems should be made available and designed in a way to attract participation in such training programmes and certification systems. Member States should consider what actions should be taken to attract groups currently under-represented in the occupational areaIn defining the training courses, the training courses and qualifications already acquired by the operators ion question. The list of trained and certified installers should be made public to ensure consumer trust and easy access to tailored designer and installer skills guaranteeing proper installation and operation of renewable heating and coolingthe basis of the previous legislation must be preserved. Member States should consider what actions should be taken to attract groups currently under-represented in the occupational areas in question.
Amendment 170 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) (15b) Similarly, the potential of grid-balancing power plants and cogeneration plants, participating in grind-balancing in support of intermittent renewable electricity and thus allowing the expansion of such renewable electricity, has to be fully utilised.
Amendment 186 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 36
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 36
‘(36) ‘renewable fuels of non-biological origin’ means liquid and gaseous fuels the energy content of which is derived from renewable sources other than biomass;’;
Amendment 189 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Renewable fuels of non-biological origin can be used for energy purposes, but also for non-energy purposes as feedstock or raw material in industries such as steel or chemicals. Moreover, low-carbon fuels, including low-carbon hydrogen, may contribute to the swift emission reduction of existing fuels and to the facilitation of the energy transition in the short and medium term, while allowing for the uptake of renewable fuels. The use of renewable fuels of non-biological origin and low-carbon fuels for both purposes exploits their full potential to replace fossil fuels used as feedstock and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industry and should therefore be included in a target for the use of renewable fuels of non- biological origin and low-carbon fuels. National measures to support the uptake of renewable fuels of non-biological origin and low-carbon fuels in industry should not result in net pollution increases due to an increased demand for electricity generation that is satisfied by the most polluting fossil fuels, such as coal, diesel, lignite, oil peat and oil shale.
Amendment 197 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1a
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1a
Amendment 212 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29 a (new)
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) Interventions aimed at increasing the use of renewable fuels and renewable electricity in transport sector shall exclude the application of other possible regulatory carbon pricing instruments (e.g. ETS) in the sector.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Recital 34
Amendment 239 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
Amendment 254 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 strengthened the bioenergy sustainability and greenhouse gas savings framework by setting criteria for all end-use sectors. It set out specific rules for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass, requiring the sustainability of harvesting operations and the accounting of land-use change emissions. To achieve an enhanced protection of especially biodiverse and carbon-rich habitats, such as primary forests, highly biodiverse forests, grasslands and peat lands, in the Member States where specific measures have not already been taken, exclusions and limitations to source forest biomass from those areas should be introduced, in line with the approach for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural biomass. In addition, the greenhouse gas emission saving criteria should also apply to existing biomass- based installations to ensure that bioenergy production in all such installations leads to greenhouse gas emission reductions compared to energy produced from fossil fuels.
Amendment 255 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 strengthened the bioenergy sustainability and greenhouse gas savings framework by setting criteria for all end-use sectors. It set out specific rules for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass, requiring the sustainability of harvesting operations and the accounting of land-use change emissions. To achieve an enhanced protection of especially biodiverse and carbon-rich habitats, such as primary forests, highly biodiverse forests, grasslands and peat lands, exclusions and limitations to source forest biomass from those areas should be introduced, in line with the approach for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural biomass. In addition, the greenhouse gas emission saving criteria should also apply to existing biomass-based installations to ensure that bioenergy production in all such installations leads to greenhouse gas emission reductions compared to energy produced from fossil fuelwhen harvesting biomass from countries that do not meet the harvesting criteria at national or subnational level or without management systems in place at the forest sourcing area in line with the approach for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural biomass.
Amendment 256 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to reduce the administrative burden for producers of renewable fuels and recycled carbon fuels and for Member States, where voluntary or national schemes have been recognised by the Commission through an implementing act as giving evidence or providing accurate data regarding the compliance with sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria as well as other requirements set in this Directive, Member States should accept the results of the certification issued by such schemes within the scope of the Commission’s recognition. In order to reduce the burden on small installations, Member States should establish a simplified verification mechanism starting 1. January 2027 for installations of between 510 and 120MW.
Amendment 268 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47 a (new)
Recital 47 a (new)
(4a) The development of energy communities is emerging as a model for developing the economy on a local basis in favour of the sustainable development of the energy transition. In this context, the reference to the action of small and medium-sized companies refers, in particular, to the safeguarding of the intervention of local companies and the economic spin-offs for the same that engage, in principle, local resources. (63-ter) Without prejudice to the previous point, in order to be effective, the development of energy communities needs to be able to make use of all the natural resources present the area; this should not prevent the participation in the energy community of consumption centres distributed at the local level, even though they belong to large companies such as commercial, tertiary or, for example, private healthcare entities that, being mainly open to the local public, can play a positive role in the spread of the local sustainable economy.
Amendment 278 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point i
Amendment 282 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
(36) ‘renewable fuels of non-biological origin’ means liquid and gaseous fuels the energy content of which is derived from renewable sources other than biomass;;
Amendment 290 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) the following points are added: (1b) 'energy from low-carbon sources' means energy from non-renewable sources including low-carbon gases, which contribute to the climate mitigation and adaption. (1c) 'energy from low-carbon gases' means energy from non-renewable gases with a greenhouse gas footprint of less than 36.4 gCO2eq/MJ calculated by the moment of placing the energy on the market / or value provided in the delegated act supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate mitigation or climate change adaptation.
Amendment 291 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) the following points are added:Recital (19) is amended as follows: 'guarantee of origin' means an electronic document which has the function of providing evidence to a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy was produced from renewable sources and/or low-carbon sources;
Amendment 293 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
Amendment 303 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – iii
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – iii
Amendment 309 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
(14oa) 16) "renewable energy community" means a legal entity: a)… b) the shareholders of members of which are natural persons, SMEs or other enterprises locally distributed with public access or local authorities, including municipalities; c)...
Amendment 311 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
(14ob) 17) "renewables power purchase agreement" means a contract under which a natural or legal person agrees to purchase renewable energy directly from a producer;
Amendment 315 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
(22a) ‘renewable fuels’ means biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of biological and non-biological origin;
Amendment 321 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Amendment 326 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
(22ab) 27-bis) "renewable gases" mean biogas and renewable fuels of non- biological origin which have been injected into the gas network within Europe;
Amendment 330 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
Amendment 333 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2
Article 2
Amendment 361 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) point (1) is amended as follows: (1) 'energy from renewable sources' or 'renewable energy' means energy from renewable non-fossil sources, namely wind, solar (solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) and geothermal energy, waste heat, ambient energy, tide, wave and other ocean energy, hydropower, biomass, landfill gas, sewage treatment plant gas, and biogas;
Amendment 367 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
(1b) 36 b [new] "Renewable Hydrogen": is hydrogen produced through the electrolysis of water (in an electrolyser, powered by electricity), and with the electricity produced from renewables and waste heat. The full life- cycle greenhouse gas emissions of the production of renewable hydrogen are close to zero. Renewable hydrogen may also be produced through the reforming of biogas (instead of natural gas) or biochemical conversion of biomass, if in compliance with sustainability requirements.
Amendment 370 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 c (new)
(1c) A new definition is added: "co-located energy storage project" means a project encompassing an energy storage facility and a facility producing renewable energy connected behind the same grid access point.
Amendment 372 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 d (new)
(1d) 2 new definitions are added: a) 'low-carbon fuels' means low-carbon hydrogen and synthetic gaseous and liquid fuels the energy content of which is derived from low-carbon hydrogen, which meet the greenhouse gas emission reduction threshold of 70%. b) 'low-carbon hydrogen' means hydrogen the energy content of which is derived from non-renewable sources, which meets a greenhouse gas emission reduction threshold of 70%;
Amendment 378 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall collectively ensure that the share of energy from renewable sources and from recycled carbon fuels in the Union’s gross final consumption of energy in 2030 is at least 40%.; In order to safeguard the Union's industrial competitiveness, each Member State may introduce measures to support the development of innovative renewable energy technologies.
Amendment 409 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
3. Member States shall take measures to ensure that energy from biomass is produced in a way that minimises undue distortive effects on the biomass raw material market and harmful impacts on biodiversity. To that end , they shall take into account the waste hierarchy as set out in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC and the cascading principlguidance referred to in the third subparagraph.
Amendment 412 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(a) Member States shall grant no support for: the production of renewable energy produced from the incineration of waste if the separate collection obligations laid down in Directive 2008/98/EC have not been complied with.
Amendment 417 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 421 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 427 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 433 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(b) From 31 December 2026, and without prejudice to the obligations in the first sub-paragraph, Member States shallmay only grant no support to the production of electricity from forest biomass in electricity-only-installations, unless such electricity meets at least one of the following conditions:on the condition that the following three requirements are met: (i) cogeneration is guaranteed and that this provides for the energy enhancement of at least 50% of the thermal energy generated by the process; (ii) the woody biomass used in installations comes from forests managed sustainably at territorial level; (iii) the plants have an electrical power not exceeding 10 MWe and are equipped with suitable filter systems for fine dust;
Amendment 435 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(b) From 31 December 202630, and without prejudice to the obligations in the first sub-paragraph and to the provision set out in Article 6, Member States shall grant no new support scheme to the production of electricity from forest biomass in electricity-only-installations, unless such electricity meets at least one of the following conditions:
Amendment 444 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 446 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(i) it(ba) the conditions set out in (b) above may be waived if at least one of the following conditions is met: (i) the electricity is produced in a region identified in a territorial just transition plan approved by the European Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/… of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund due to its reliance on solid fossil fuels, and meets the relevant requirements set in Article 29(11);
Amendment 451 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 452 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(ii) (ii) the electricity is produced applying Biomass CO2 Capture and Storage and meets the requirements set in Article 29(11), second subparagraph.
Amendment 453 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(iia) (i) it is produced by plants that are already in operation at the date of entry into force of this Directive, for which modifications in the direction of cogeneration are not possible due to the absence of the infrastructure or demand conditions that make them economically viable or because they are located in areas of complex industrial crisis or in accordance with Cohesion policies. In any case, the plants must comply with the net energy efficiency levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT- AEELs) as defined in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 ( 1 ).
Amendment 462 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
(ba) (ii) it is produced in a region identified in a territorial just transition plan approved by the European Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/… of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund due to its reliance on solid fossil fuels, and meets the relevant requirements set in Article 29(11); (iii) it is produced in a facility that has undertaken an assessment to prove its readiness for the application of Biomass CO2 Capture and Storage and meets the requirements set in Article 29(11), second subparagraph; (iv) it is produced in a facility which is part of a supports scheme that is designed to remove the risk of security of supply or ensure grid stability and meets the relevant requirements set in Article 29(11) (v) it is produced in an area where there is no commercial demand for heat.
Amendment 474 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
No later than one year after [the entry into force of this amending Directive], the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 35 on how to apply the cascading principle for biomass, in particular on how to minimise the use of quality roundwood for energy production, with a focus on support schemes and with due regard to nationalguidelines laying out best practices for the biomass specificitiestor.
Amendment 481 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
Amendment 494 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3
Article 3
4a. Member States shall establish a framework, which may include support schemes and facilitating the uptake of renewable and co-located projects power purchase agreements, enabling the deployment of renewable electricitnergy to a level that is consistent with the Member State’s national contribution referred to in paragraph 2 and at a pace that is consistent with the indicative trajectories referred to in Article 4(a)(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. In particular, that framework shall tackle remaining barriers to a high level of renewable energy supply, including those related to permitting procedures, to a high level of renewable electricity supplyand ensure long term price signals for investment decisions, including investments in system adequacy, stability and flexibility through competitive, transparent and non- discriminatory bidding process, which provide for a remuneration of the awarded recipients based on market prices. When designing that framework, Member States shall take into account the additional renewable electricitnergy required to meet demand in the transport, industry, building and heating and cooling sectors and for the production of renewable fuels of non-biological origin.; National measures to support the uptake of renewable fuels of non-biological origin should not result in net pollution increases due to an increased demand for energy generation that is satisfied by the most polluting fossil fuels.
Amendment 515 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) Article 3a (new) Member States shall collectively ensure that the share of energy from renewable gases in the Union expressed as a percentage share of natural gas consumed is at least [11]% by 2030.
Amendment 518 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Amendment 544 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 9
Article 9
7a. Member States bordering a sea basin shall cooperate to jointly define the amount of offshore renewable energy they plan to produce in that sea basin by 2050, with intermediate steps in 2030 and 2040. They shall take into account the specificities and development in each region including the technical and economic feasibility of transmission grid infrastructure, the offshore renewable potential of the sea basin and the importance of ensuring the associated integrated grid planning. Member States shall notify that amount in the updated integrated national energy and climate plans submitted pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.;
Amendment 550 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point -a (new)
(-a) Paragraph 1, second subparagraph is amended as follows: Member States shall, in particular, take the appropriate steps to ensure that: (a) administrative procedures are streamlined, and expedited at the appropriate administrative level and predictable timeframes are established for the procedures referred to in the first subparagraph; (b) rules concerning authorisation, certification and licensing are objective, transparent and proportionate, do not discriminate between applicants and take fully into account the particularities of individual renewable energy technologies; (c) administrative charges paid by consumers, planners, architects, builders and equipment and system installers and suppliers are transparent and cost- related; (d) simplified and less burdensome authorisation procedures, including a simple-notification procedure, are established for decentralised devices, and for producing and storing energy from renewable sources, provided that the same simplified authorisation procedures are applied also to the associated transmission and distribution network developments in case the latter do not increase the occupied area. (e) the authorisation procedures for power plants, including offshore renewable plants, and for the network assets necessary for their connection and integration are integrated or coordinated where different procedures for power plants and network assets are foreseen according to national law.
Amendment 558 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15
Article 15
8. Member States shall assess the regulatory and administrative barriers to long-term renewables and co-located projects power purchase agreements, and shall remove unjustified barriers to, and promote the uptake of, such agreements, including by exploring how to reduce the financial risks associated with them, in particular by using credit guarantees. Member States shall ensure that those agreements are not subject to disproportionate or discriminatory procedures or charges, and that any associated guarantees of origin can be transferred to the buyer of the renewable energy under the renewable or co-located project power purchase agreement. Moreover, long-term renewable and co- located projects power purchase agreements of over 10 years should be encouraged.
Amendment 567 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15
Article 15
Member States shall describe their policies and measures promoting the uptake of renewables and co-located projects power purchase agreements in their integrated national energy and climate plans referred to in Articles 3 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and progress reports submitted pursuant to Article 17 of that Regulation. They shall also provide, in those reports, an indication of the volume of renewable power generation supported by renewables and co-located projects power purchase agreements.;
Amendment 620 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) for renewable electricity, by multiplying the amount of renewable electricity that is supplied to all transport modes by the fossil fuel comparator ECF(et) set out in in Annex V;
Amendment 621 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15a
Article 15a
2. Member States shall introduce measures in their building regulations and codes and, where applicable, in their support schemes, to increase the share of electricity and heating and cooling from renewable sources in the building stock, including national measures relating to substantial increases in renewables self- consumption, renewable energy communities and local energy storage, in combination with energy efficiency improvements relating to cogeneration and passive, nearly zero- energy and zero- energy buildings.
Amendment 624 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15a
Article 15a
To achieve the indicative share of renewables set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall, in their building regulations and codes and, where applicable, in their support schemes or by other means with equivalent effect, require the use of minimum levels of energy from renewable sources in buildings, in line with the provisions of Directive 2010/31/EU. Member States shall allow those minimum levels to be fulfilled, among others, through efficient district heating and cooling and through the use of Guarantees of Origin in line with Article 19 of this Directive.
Amendment 633 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15a
Article 15a
4. In order to achieve the indicative share of renewable energy set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall promote the use of renewable heating and cooling systems and equipment. To that end, Member States shall use all appropriate measures, tools and incentives, including, among others, energy labels developed under Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , energy performance certificates pursuant to Directive 2010/31/EU, or other appropriate certificates or standards developed at national or Union level, and shall ensure the provision of adequate information and advice on renewable, highly energy efficient alternatives as well as on financial instruments and incentives available to promote an increased replacement rate of old heating systems incompatible with the use of renewable fuels, increased incentives on the use of renewable energy in heating and cooling systems and equipment and an increased switch to solutions based on renewable energy.; __________________ 26 Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 1).
Amendment 643 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) Article 16, paragraph 1 is amended as follows: Member States shall set up or designate one or more contact points. Those contact points shall, upon request by the applicant, guide through and facilitate the entire administrative permit application and granting process. The applicant shall not be required to contact more that one contact point for the entire process. The permit-granting process shall cover the relevant administrative permits to build, repower and operate plants for the production of energy from renewable sources, including co-located energy storage projects, energy storage of a new renewable energy facility, and assets necessary for their connection to the grid. The permit-granting process shall comprise all procedures from the acknowledgment of the receipt of the application to the transmission of the outcome of the procedure referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 647 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 b (new)
(6b) Article 16, paragraph 4 is amended as follows: 4. Without prejudice to paragraph 7, the permit-granting process referred to in paragraph 1 for power plants and assets necessary for their connection and integration in the grid shall not exceed two years, including all relevant procedures of competent authorities. Where duly justified on the grounds of extraordinary circumstances, that two- year period may be extended by up to one year.
Amendment 648 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 c (new)
(6c) Article 16, paragraph 6 is amended as follows: 6. Member States shall facilitate the repowering of existing renewable energy plants by ensuring a simplified and swift permit-granting process. The length of that process shall not exceed one year. Where duly justified on the grounds of extraordinary circumstances, such as on grounds of overriding safety reasons where the repowering projects impacts substantially on the grid or the original capacity, size or performance of the installation, that one-year period may be extended by up to one year. In the event the repowering project determines an increase in the capacity of the installation and the need for further network developments without increasing the occupied area, the repowering project and the grid development projects associated to the repowering are authorized through the same simplified procedure pursuant to the first subparagraph,
Amendment 649 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 d (new)
(6d) Article 16, paragraph 6bis is added: 6bis. Member States shall appoint a competent body or authority which differs from the authority empowered to issue authorisation decisions with substitution powers on the latter. Those powers shall be exercised where the terms referred to in paragraphs 4 and 6 for deciding on the authorisation for power plants and the assets necessary for their connection and integration in the grid are infringed. The substituting competent body or authority shall decide on the procedure within halved timings as referred to in paragraphs 4 and 6.
Amendment 660 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 18
Article 18
To achieve such sufficient numbers of installers and designers, Member States shall ensure that, as far as compatible with national qualification and certification schemes, sufficient training programmes leading to qualification or certification covering renewable heating and cooling technologies, and their latest innovative solutions, are made available. Member States shall ensure the same level of qualification within their territory by adopting all the necessary measures and tools, such as exchange information systems. Member States shall put in place measures to promote participation in such programmes, in particular by small and medium-sized enterprises and the self- employed. Member States may put in place voluntary agreements with the relevant technology providers and vendors to train sufficient numbers of installers, which may be based on estimates of sales, in the latest innovative solutions and technologies available on the market.
Amendment 662 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point a
Directive (EU) No 2018/2001
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
— (a) in the case of solid biomass fuels, in installations producing electricity, heating and cooling with a total rated thermal input equal to or exceeding 520 MW and, from 2027, 10 MW,
Amendment 663 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 18
Article 18
Amendment 674 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
(8) Article 19 is amended as follows: Article 19 Guarantees of origin for energy from renewable sources and/or from low carbon sources 1. For the purposes of demonstrating to final customer the share or quantity of energy from renewable sources and/or the share or quantity of energy from low- carbon sources in an energy supplier's energy mix and in the energy supplied to consumers under contracts marketed with reference to the consumption of energy from renewable sources and/or from low- carbon sources can be guaranteed as such within the meaning of this Directive, in accordance with objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria. 2. To that end, Member States shall ensure that a guarantee of origin is issued in response to a request from a producer of energy from renewable sources and from a producer of energy from low- carbon sources. Member States may arrange for guarantees of origin to be issued for energy from other non- renewable sources. Issuance of guarantees of origin may be made subject to a minimum capacity limit. A guarantee of origin shall be of the standard size of 1 MWh. No more than one guarantee of origin shall be issued in respect of each unit of energy produced. […] The guarantee of origin shall have no function in terms of Member State's compliance with Article 3. Transfers of guarantees of origin, separately or together with the physical transfer of energy, shall have no effect on the decision of Member States to use statistical transfers, joint projects or joint support schemes for compliance with Article 3 or on the calculation of the gross final consumption of energy from renewable sources in accordance with Article 7. For the avoidance of doubt, this subparagraph does not prevent the use of guarantees of origin for the purpose of measuring and demonstrating compliance with greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy obligations set out in this Directive.
Amendment 675 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
(8) Article 19 is amended as follows:Recital (59) is amended as follows: Guarantees of origin which are currently in place for renewable electricity should be extended to cover renewable gas and low-carbon energy sources. Further extending the guarantees of origin system to energy from non-renewable sources, other than low-carbon energy sources, should be an option for Member States. This would provide a consistent means of proving to final customers the origin of renewable gas such as biomethane and would facilitate greater cross-border trade in such gas. It would also enable the creation of guarantees of origin for other renewable and low-carbon gas such as hydrogen.
Amendment 694 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Amendment 698 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a b (new)
(ab) Article 19, paragraph 11 is amended as follows: 11. Member States shall not recognise guarantees of origins issued by a third country except where the compatible guarantees of origin systems was established in that third country, and only where there is import or export of energy between Union and that third country. The guarantees of origin systems established in third countries shall be considered compatible, in particular where the European Commission has recognised its compatibility with the requirements and standards applicable in the Union
Amendment 701 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a c (new)
(ac) Article 19, paragraph 12 is amended as follows: 12. A Member State may, in accordance with Union law, introduce objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria for the use of guarantees of origin in accordance with the obligations laid down in Article 3(9) of Directive 2009/72/EC and other similar provision contained in the Directive 2009/73/EC or other provisions of the Union law.
Amendment 706 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b a (new)
(ba) Article 19, paragraph 9 is amended as follows: 9. Member States shall recognise guarantees of origin issued by other Member States in accordance with this Directive exclusively as evidence of the elements referred to in paragraph 1 and points (a) to (h) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 7. A Member State may refuse to recognise a guarantee of origin only where it has well-founded doubts about its accuracy, reliability or veracity. The Member State shall notify the Commission of such a refusal and its justification.
Amendment 721 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
(9a) New paragraph 4 in article 20: Similarly, Member States shall, where relevant, take the necessary actions to integrate intermittent renewable electricity in the grid while ensuring grid stability and security of supply. Such actions can relate to the development of solutions such as storage facilities and grid- balancing power plants and cogeneration plants, participating in grid-balancing in support of intermittent renewable electricity.
Amendment 724 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 20a – paragraph 1
Article 20a – paragraph 1
Amendment 735 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
1. Member States shall require transmission system operators and distribution system operators in their territory to make available information on the share of renewable electricity and the greenhouse gas emissions content of the electricity suppliabsorbed in each bidding zone, as accurately as possible and as close to real time as possible but in time intervals of no more than one hour, with forecasting where available. This information shall be made available digitally in a manner that ensures it can be used by electricity market participants, aggregators, consumers and end-users, and that it can be read by electronic communication devices such as smart metering systems, electric vehicle recharging points, heating and cooling systems and building energy management systems.
Amendment 749 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point e
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
Article 29 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) that harvesting is carried out considering maintenance of soil quality and biodiversity with the aim of minimising negative impacts, in a way that avoids harvesting of stumps and roots, degradation of primary forests or their conversion into plantation forests, and harvesting onavoiding damaging vulnerable soils; minimises large clear-cuts and ensures locally appropriate thresholds for deadwood extraction andor requirements to use logging systems that minimise negative impacts on soil quality, including soil compaction, and on biodiversity features and habitats:’;
Amendment 758 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 20a
Article 20a
4. Member States shall ensure that the national regulatory framework does not discriminate against participation in the electricity markets, including congestion management and the provision of flexibility and balancing services, of small or mobile systems such as domestic batteries and electric vehicles, bothpower-to- gas units, either directly andor through aggregation. where a minimum power threshold is appropriate for services provided by smaller units;
Amendment 764 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point f
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iv
Article 29 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iv
iv) that harvesting is carried out considering maintenance of soil quality and biodiversity with the aim of minimising negative impacts, in a way that avoids harvesting of stumps and roots, degradation of primary forests or their conversion into plantation forests, and harvesting on vulnerable soils; minimises large clear-cuts and ensures locally appropriate thresholds for deadwood extraction andor requirements to use logging systems that minimise the negative impacts on soil quality, including soil compaction, and on biodiversity features and habitats:’;
Amendment 765 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
(10a) Article 22(4) is amended as follows, adding a subparagraph fa: (fa) agricultural and forestry holdings, individually or in aggregate form (cooperatives, consortia, etc.), set up and/or participate in energy communities;
Amendment 783 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22a
Article 22a
Amendment 788 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point g
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 29 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) at least 70 % for electricity, heating and cooling production from biomass fuels used in installations in operation from 1 January 2021 until 31 December 2025, and at least 80 % for installations in operation from 1 January 2026.’;
Amendment 817 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 23–point a
Article 23–point a
1. In order to promote the use of renewable energy in the heating and cooling sector, each Member State shall, strive to increase the share of renewable energy in that sector by at least 1.1 percentage points as an annual average calculated for the periods 2021 to 2025 and 2026 to 2030, starting from the share of renewable energy in the heating and cooling sector in 2020, expressed in terms of national share of gross final energy consumption and calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Article 7. In the definition of the increase of the share of renewable energy in the heating and cooling sector, Member States shall take into account the type and technological level of plants, as well as their date of installation, in order to verify the actual possibility of integration of renewable energy and to foresee different timing of implementation.
Amendment 846 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 30 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
Article 30 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
For installations producing electricity heating and cooling with a total rated thermal input between 510 and 120 MW, starting from 2027, Member States shall establish simplified national verification schemes to ensure the fulfillment of the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions criteria set out in paragraphs (2) to (7) and (10) of Article 29.’;
Amendment 873 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1
Article 31a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1
2. Member States shall require the relevant economic operators to enter in a timely manner accurate information into that database on the transactions made and the sustainability characteristics of the fuels subject to those transactions, including their life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, starting from their point of production to the moment it is consumed in the Union. Information on whether support has been provided for the production of a specific consignment of fuel, and if so, on the type of support scheme, shall also be included in the database.
Amendment 910 #
2021/0218(COD)
18. For the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 17, the emissions to be divided shall be eec + el + esca + those fractions of ep, etd, eccs, and eccr that take place up to and including the process step at which a co-product is produced. If any allocation to co-products has taken place at an earlier process step in the life-cycle, the fraction of those emissions assigned in the last such process step to the intermediate fuel product shall be used for those purposes instead of the total of those emissions. In the case of biogas and biomethane, all co-products that do not fall under the scope of point 7 shall be taken into account for the purposes of that calculation. No emissions shall be allocated to wastes and residues. Co- products that have a negative energy content shall be considered to have an energy content of zero for the purposes of the calculation. Wastes and residues including all wastes and residues included in Annex IX shall be considered to have zero life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions up to the process of collection of those materials irrespectively of whether they are processed to interim products before being transformed into the final product. Residues that are not included in Annex IX and fit for use in the food or feed market shall be considered to have the same amount of emissions from the extraction, harvesting or cultivation of raw materials, eec as their closest substitute in the food and feed market that is included in the table in part D. In the case of biomass fuels produced in refineries, other than the combination of processing plants with boilers or cogeneration units providing heat and/or electricity to the processing plant, the unit of analysis for the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 17 shall be the refinery’;
Amendment 926 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annexe VI – part C – point 18 – subparagraph 3
Annexe VI – part C – point 18 – subparagraph 3
Wastes and residues including all wastes and residues included in Annex IX shall be considered to have zero life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions up to the process of collection of those materials irrespectively of whether they are processed to interim products before being transformed into the final product. Residues that are not included in Annex IX and fit for use in the food or feed market shall be considered to have the same amount of emissions from the extraction, harvesting or cultivation of raw materials, eec as their closest substitute in the food and feed market that is included in the table in part D of Annex V.
Amendment 989 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 25
Article 25
For the calculation of the reduction referred to in point (a) and the share referred to in point (b), Member States shall take into account renewable fuels of non-biological origin also when they are used as intermediate products for the production of conventionaltransport fuels. For the calculation of the reduction referred to in point (a), Member States mayshall take into account recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 994 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 25
Article 25
When setting the obligation on fuel suppliers, Member States may exempt fuel suppliers supplying electricity or renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin from the requirement to comply with the minimum share of advanced biofuels and biogas produced from the feedstock listed in Part A of Annex IX with respect to those fuels. When setting the obligation referred to in points (a) and (b) to the first subparagraph to ensure the achievement of the targets set out therein, Member States may do so, inter alia, by means of measures targeting volumes, energy content or greenhouse gas emissions, provided that it is demonstrated that the greenhouse gas intensity reduction and minimum shares referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph are achieved.
Amendment 1015 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 25
Article 25
2. Member States shall establish a mechanism allowing fuel suppliers in their territory to exchange credits for supplying renewable energy to the transport sector. Economic operators that supply renewable electricity to electricnergy to vehicles through public recharging and refuelling stations shall receive credits, irrespectively of whether the economic operators are subject to the obligation set by the Member State on fuel suppliers, and may sell those credits to fuel suppliers, which shall be allowed to use the credits to fulfil the obligation set out in paragraph 1, first subparagraph.;
Amendment 1055 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27
Article 27
Calculation rules in the transport sector and with regard to renewable fuels of non- biological origin regardless of their end use;
Amendment 1066 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27
Article 27
(iii) for renewable electricity, by multiplying the amount of renewable electricity that is supplied to all transport modes by the fossil fuel comparator ECF(et) set out in in Annex V;
Amendment 1091 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27
Article 27
(c) the shares of advanced biofuels and biogas produced from the feedstock listed in Part A of Annex IX and of renewable fuels of non-biological origin supplied in the aviation and maritime modes shall be considered to be 1,24 times their energy content.;
Amendment 1113 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii – introductory part
(iii) in the fifth subparagraph, the introductory phrase is replaced by the following:including its points a) and b), is deleted
Amendment 1117 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27
Article 27
However, electricity that has been taken from the grid, reinjected from an energy storage facility or obtained from direct connection to an installation generating renewable electricity may be fully counted as fully renewable electricity where it is used for the production of renewable fuels of non-biologicalprovided that it is produced exclusively from renewable sources and the renewable properties have been demonstrated through cancellation of guarantees of origin, providedensuring that the installation:;renewable properties of that electricity are claimed only once and only in one end- use sector.
Amendment 1122 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27
Article 27
Article 27, paragraph 3, subparagraph 5, point a) is deleted
Amendment 1123 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
Amendment 1128 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii a (new)
(iiia) Article 27 the seventh and last subparagraph is deleted
Amendment 1129 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point e – point iii b (new)
(iii b) Recital (90) is amended as follows: Renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin are important to increase the share of renewable energy in sectors that are expected to rely on liquid fuels in the long term. To ensure that renewable fuels of non-biological origin contribute to greenhouse gas reduction, the electricity used for the fuel production should be of renewable origin.
Amendment 1148 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point i a (new)
(ia) Article 29, paragraph 1, sub- paragraph 3 is amended as follows: Electricity, heating and cooling produced from municipal solid waste and own biomass residues from biomass processing shall not be subject to the greenhouse gas emissions saving criterial laid down in paragraph 10.
Amendment 1149 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
— (a) in the case of solid biomass fuels, in installations producing electricity, heating and cooling not already operating at the time of entry into force of the present directive with a total rated thermal input equal to or exceeding 520 MW,
Amendment 1159 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
Amendment 1170 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
This paragraph, with the exception of the first subparagraph, point (c), also applies to biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass originating from a country or subnational entity or forest sourcing area which does not meet the criteria set out in paragraph 6a or 6b.;
Amendment 1177 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
The first subparagraph, with the exception of points (b) and (c), and the second subparagraph also apply to biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass originating from a country or subnational entity or forest sourcing area which does not meet the criteria set out in paragraph 6a or 6b.;
Amendment 1180 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
5. Biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural or forest biomass from a country or subnational entity or forest sourcing area which does not meet the criteria set out in paragraph 6a or 6b, taken into account for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, points (a), (b) and (c), shall not be made from raw material obtained from land that was peatland in January 2008, unless evidence is provided that the cultivation and harvesting of that raw material does not involve drainage of previously undrained soil and compliance on national, subnational, or forest sourcing area level, in line with the criteria to minimise the risk of using forest biomass derived from unsustainable production referred to in paragraph 6, can be reported by competent authorities.;
Amendment 1186 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point e
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
Amendment 1191 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point f
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
Amendment 1201 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29a
Article 29a
1. Energy from renewable fuels of non-biological origin shall be counted towards Member States’ shares of renewable energy and the targets referred to in Articles 3(1), 15a(1), 22a(1), 23(1), 24(4) and 25(1) only if the greenhouse gas emissions savings from the use of those fuels are at least 70 % compared to the relevant fossil fuel comparator.
Amendment 1204 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29a
Article 29a
2. Energy from recycled carbon fuels mayshall be counted towards the greenhouse gas emissions reduction target referred to in Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (a), and towards Member States' shares of renewable energy and recycled carbon fuels to in Article 3(1), only if the greenhouse gas emissions savings from the use of those fuels are at least 70% compared to the relevant fossil fuel comparator.
Amendment 1213 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a – introductory part
(a) in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the introductory phrase is replaced by the following: is amended as follows: (a) allows consignments of raw material or fuels with differing sustainability anda greenhouse gas emissions saving characteristics to be mixed for instance in a container, processing or logistical facility, transmission and distribution infrastructure or site, including European interconnected system for gas consisting of transmission networks, distribution networks, LNG facilities and/or storage facilities and considered as a single logistical facility for this purpose where only physical entry to and exit from the system based on the respective transactions shall be tracked;
Amendment 1215 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 30. paragraph 1a
Article 30. paragraph 1a
1a. Where renewable fuels and, recycled carbon fuels and biogas are to be counted towards the targets referred to in Articles 3(1), 15a(1), 22a(1), 23(1), 24(4) and 25(1), Member States shall require economic operators to show that the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria laid down in Articles 29(2) to (7) and (10) and 29a(1) and (2) for renewable fuels and, recycled- carbon fuels and biogas have been fulfilled. For that purpose, they shallmay require economic operators to use a book and claim system through the means of Guarantees of Origin combined with a mass balance system which:;.
Amendment 1217 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 30. paragraph 1b
Article 30. paragraph 1b
Amendment 1220 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point b – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point b – introductory part
(b) inArticle 30 paragraph 3, the first and second subparagraphs are replaced by the following: is amended as follows: 3. Member States shall take measure to ensure that economic operators submit reliable information regarding the compliance with the greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria laid down in Articles 29(2) to (7) and (10) and 29a(1) and (2), and that economic operators make available to the relevant Member States shall enable the recording of such information on the guarantees of origin issued according to Article 19 of this Directive after it has been verified by relevant voluntary or national schemes setting standards for the production of renewable fuels and recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 1224 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point b
Member States shall take measures to ensure that economic operators submit reliable information regarding the compliance with the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria laid down in Articles 29(2) to (7) and (10) and 29a(1) and (2), and that economic operators make available to the relevant Member State, upon request, the data used to develop that information. Member State shall not require economic operators supplying energy through the European interconnected system for gas to provide further evidence of compliance with the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria laid down in Articles 29(2) to (7) and (10) and 29a(1) and (2), where the compliance verification was carried out at the site of the energy production and documented on the guarantees of origin.
Amendment 1229 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 30
Article 30
6. Member States may set up national schemes where compliance with the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria laid down in Articles 29(2) to (7) and (10) and 29a(1) and (2), in accordance with the methodology developed under Article 29a(3), is verified throughout the entire chain of custody involving competent national authorities, except for the European interconnected system for gas, where compliance with sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria is verified by the moment of the physical entry of gases into this system. Those schemes may also be used to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information included by economic operators in the Union database, to demonstrate compliance with Article 27(3) and for the certification of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels with low indirect land-use change-risk.
Amendment 1230 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29
Article 29
For installations producing electricity heating and cooling with a total rated thermal input between 510 and 120 MW, starting 1. January 2027, Member States shall establish simplified national verification schemes to ensure the fulfillment of the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions criteria set out in paragraphs (2) to (7) and (10) of Article 29.;
Amendment 1240 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Amendment 1244 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
1. The Commission shall ensure that a Union database is set up to enable the tracing of liquid and gaseous renewable fuels, low-carbon fuels and recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 1249 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a (new article)
Article 31a (new article)
2. Member States shall require the relevant economic operators to enter in a timely manner accurate information into that database on the transactions made and the sustainability characteristics of the fuels subject to those transactions, including their life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, starting from their point of production to the moment it is consumed in the Union. Information on whether support has been provided for the production of a specific consignment of fuel, and if so, on the type of support scheme, shall also be included in the databaseFor the gaseous fuels injected into the European interconnected system for gas within the meaning of Directive 209/73/EC: a) only the physical entry to and physical exit from the system based on respective transactions shall be registered; b) sustainability information, recorder in the guarantee of origin according to Article 19(7)(h), shall be registered independently of the individual physical flows and the underlying transactions.
Amendment 1251 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Where appropriate to improve traceability of data along the entire supply chain, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 35 to further extend the scope of the information to be included in the Union database to cover relevant data from the point of production or collection of the raw material used for the fuel production. For gaseous fuels injected into the European gas network, the EU gas system should be considered as a single logistical facility and for the avoidance of doubt there should be no physical tracing of molecules within the network. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, for gaseous biomass fuels and gaseous renewable fuels of non-biological origin injected into the gas system, economic operators should enter information on the transactions made and the sustainability characteristics of the fuels up to the injection point, where the mass balancing traceability system will be replaced by a book-and-claim system as referred in the (Article 30(1a)). The information on the cancellation of certificates at final points of consumption should be registered in the Union Database and shall be considered the final consignment for the volumes injected.
Amendment 1252 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a (new)
Article 31a (new)
4. IfWhen guarantees of origin have been issued for the production of a consignment of renewable gases, Member States shall ensure that thosesuch guarantees of origin are cancelled before the consignment of renewable gases can be registered in the databregistered in the database as a proof of sustainability for related consignment and cancelled after the consignment is withdrawn from the European interconnected system for gase.
Amendment 1255 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
5. Member States shall ensure that the accuracy and completeness of the information included by economic operators in the database is verified, for instance by using voluntary or national schemes or system of guarantees of origin.
Amendment 1257 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 35
Article 35
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 8(3), second subparagraph, Article 29a(3), Article 26(2), fourth subparagraph, Article 26(2) fifth subparagraph, Article 27(1), second subparagraph, Article 27(3), fourth subparagraph, Article 28(5), Article 28(6), second subparagraph, Article 31(5), second subparagraph, and Article 31a(2), second subparagraph, shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from [the entry into force of this amending Directive]. In accordance with Article 27(1) the Commission shall adopt a delegated act amending Annex III in accordance with scientific and technical progress within the first year after [the entry into force]. In accordance with Article 31(5), the Commission shall adopt a delegated act amending Annexes V and VI by adding or revising default values for production pathways within the first year after [the entry into force]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.;
Amendment 1278 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex III
Annex III
ENERGY CONTENT OF FUELS Annex III is amended adding these fuels: Fuel - Energy content by weight - Energy content by volume FUELS FROM BIOMASS AND/OR BIOMASS PROCESSING OPERATIONS [Bio-propane] Bio-butane - 45 - 27 RENEWABLE FUELS THAT CAN BE PRODUCED FROM VARIOUS RENEWABLE SOURCES, INCLUDING BIOMASS Propane from renewable sources - 46 - 24 Butane from renewable sources - 45 -27
Amendment 1287 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex V
Annex V
18. For the purposes of the calculations referred to in point 17, the emissions to be divided shall be eec + el + esca + those fractions of ep, etd, eccs and eccr that take place up to and including the process step at which a co-product is produced. If any allocation to co-products has taken place at an earlier process step in the life-cycle, the fraction of those emissions assigned in the last such process step to the intermediate fuel product shall be used for those purposes instead of the total of those emissions. In the case of biogas and biomethane, all co-products that do not fall under the scope of point 7 shall be taken into account for the purposes of that calculation. No emissions shall be allocated to wastes and residues. Co- products that have a negative energy content shall be considered to have an energy content of zero for the purposes of the calculation. Wastes and residues including all wastes and residues included in Annex IX shall be considered to have zero life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions up to the process of collection of those materials irrespectively of whether they are processed to interim products before being transformed into the final product. Residues that are not included in Annex IX and fit for use in the food or feed market shall be considered to have the same amount of emissions from the extraction, harvesting or cultivation of raw materials, eec as their closest substitute in the food and feed market that is included in the table in part D. In the case of biomass fuels produced in refineries, other than the combination of processing plants with boilers or cogeneration units providing heat and/or electricity to the processing plant, the unit of analysis for the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 17 shall be the refinery;
Amendment 1296 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Wastes and residues including all wastes and residues included in Annex IX shall be considered to have zero life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions up to the process of collection of those materials irrespectively of whether they are processed to interim products before being transformed into the final product. Residues that are not included in Annex IX and fit for use in the food or feed market shall be considered to have the same amount of emissions from the extraction, harvesting or cultivation of raw materials, eec as their closest substitute in the food and feed market that is included in the table in part D of Annex V.
Amendment 1297 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c a (new)
c a) (d) footnote (3) is replaced by the following (3) Close storage means that the digestate resulting from the digestion process is stored in a gas-tight tank and that the additional biogas released during storage is considered to be recovered for production of additional electricity or biomethane. In the case of biowaste, close storage means that the digestate resulting from the digestion process is directly composted. No greenhouse gas emissions are included in that process.
Amendment 1308 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
Amendment 41 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Greenhouse gases that are not directly released into the atmosphere should be considered emissions under the EU ETS and allowances should be surrendered for those emissions unless they are captured and reused for example to produce recycled carbon fuels and renewables liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin , stored in a storage site in accordance with Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , or they are permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts specifying the conditions where greenhouse gases are to be considered as permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use, including obtaining a carbon removal certificate, where appropriate, in view of regulatory developments with regard to the certification of carbon removals. _________________ 46Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114).
Amendment 54 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In the European Green Deal, the Commission stated its intention to take additional measures to address greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime transport sector through a basket of measures to enable the Union to reach its emissions reduction targets. In this context, Directive 2003/87/EC should be amended to include the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS in order to ensure this sector contributes to the increased climate objectives of the Union as well as to the objectives of the Paris Agreement, which requires developed countries to take the lead by undertaking economy-wide emission reduction targets, while developing countries are encouraged to move over time towards economy-wide emission reduction or limitation targets.49 Considering that emissions from international aviation outside Europe should be capped from January 2021 by global market-based action while there is no action in place that caps or prices maritime transport emissions, it is appropriate that the EU ETS covers a share of the emissions from voyages between a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and port under the jurisdiction of a third country, with the third country being able to decide on appropriate action in respect of the other share of emissions. The extension of the EU ETS to the maritime transport sector should thus include half of the emissions from ships performing voyages arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State from a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State, half of the emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State, emissions from ships performing voyages arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State, and emissions at berth in a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State. This approach has been noted as a practical way to solve the issue of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Capabilities, which has been a longstanding challenge in the UNFCCC context. The coverage of a share of the emissions from both incoming and outgoing voyages between the Union and third countries ensures the effectiveness of the EU ETS, notably by increasing the environmental impact of the measure compared to a geographical scope limited to voyages within the EU, while limiting the risk of evasive port calls and the risk of delocalisation of transhipment activities outside the Union. To ensure a smooth inclusion of the sector in the EU ETS, the surrendering of allowances by shipping companies should be gradually increased with respect to verified emissions reported for the period 2023 to 2025. To protect the environmental integrity of the system, to the extent that fewer allowances are surrendered in respect of verified emissions for maritime transport during those years, once the difference between verified emissions and allowances surrendered has been established each year, a corresponding a number of allowances should be cancelled. As from 2026, shipping companies should surrender the number of allowances corresponding to all of their verified emissions reported in the preceding year. However, measures should be taken to ensure that the extension of the ETS to maritime transport affects Member States in a fair and not disproportionate manner, taking into account their specific circumstances. _________________ 49 Paris Agreement, Article 4(4). 49
Amendment 75 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
Amendment 85 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), established under Regulation (EU) […./..] of the European Parliament and of the Council51 , is an alternative to free allocation to address the risk of carbon leakage. To the extent that sectors and subsectors are covered by that measure, they should not receive free allocation. However, a transitional phasing-out of free allowances is needed to allow producers, importers and traders to adjust to the new regime. The reduction of free allocation should be implemented by applying a factor to free allocation for CBAM sectors, while the CBAM is phased in. Sufficient safeguards should nevertheless be provided for the products intended for exports and their producers. This percentage (CBAM factor) should be equal to 100 % during the transitional period between the entry into force of [CBAM Regulation] and 2025, 90 % in 2026 and should be reduced by 10 percentage points each year to reach 0 % and thereby eliminate free allocation by the tenth year. The relevant delegated acts on free allocation should be adjusted accordingly for the sectors and subsectors covered by the CBAM, taking into account the need to maintain free allowances for the products that are exported. The free allocation no longer provided to the CBAM sectors based on this calculation (CBAM demand) must be auctioned and the revenues will accrue to the Innovation Fund, so as to support innovation in low carbon technologies, carbon capture and utilisation (‘CCU’), carbon capture and geological storage (‘CCS’), renewable energy and energy storage, in a way that contributes to mitigating climate change. Special attention should be given to projects in CBAM sectors. To respect the proportion of the free allocation available for the non- CBAM sectors, the final amount to deduct from the free allocation and to be auctioned should be calculated based on the proportion that the CBAM demand represents in respect of the free allocation needs of all sectors receiving free allocation. _________________ 51 [please insert full OJ reference]
Amendment 95 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 100 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 a (new)
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) In order to reflect the actual technological progress within installations included in product benchmarks with consideration of fuel and electricity exchange ability in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/447 and where the share of indirect emissions is higher than 50% of the relevant product benchmarks, the update of such benchmarks for the periods as of 2026 shall not be affected by the evolution of the carbon intensity of the electricity mix.
Amendment 102 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) A comprehensive approach to innovation is essential for achieving the European Green Deal objectives. At EU level, the necessary research and innovation efforts are supported, among others, through Horizon Europe which include significant funding and new instruments for the sectors coming under the ETS. Consequently, the Innovation Fund should seek synergies with Horizon Europe and, where relevant, with other Union funding programmes. Member States should ensure that the national transposition provisions do not hamper innovations and are technologically neutral.
Amendment 111 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The scope of the Innovation Fund referred to in Article 10a(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC should be extended to support innovation in and demonstration of low- carbon technologies and processes that concern the consumption of fuels in the sectors of buildings and road transport. In addition, the Innovation Fund should serve to support investments to decarbonise the maritime transport sector, including investments in sustainable alternative fuels, such as hydrogen and ammonia and synthetic fuels that are produced from renewables, as well as zero-emission propulsion technologies like wind technologies. Considering that revenues generated from penalties raised in Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]52 are allocated to the Innovation Fund as external assigned revenue in accordance with Article 21(5) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission should ensure that due consideration is given to support for innovative projects aimed at accelerating the development and deployment of renewable and low carbon fuels in the maritime sector, as specified in Article 21(1) of Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]. To ensure sufficient funding is available for innovation within this extended scope, the Innovation Fund should be supplemented with 50 million allowances, stemming partly from the allowances that could otherwise be auctioned, and partly from the allowances that could otherwise be allocated for free, in accordance with the current proportion of funding provided from each source to the Innovation Fund. _________________ 52[add ref to the FuelEU Maritime Regulation].
Amendment 127 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) Renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuels can be important to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in sectors that are hard to decarbonise. Where recycled carbon fuels and renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin are produced from captured carbon dioxide under an activity covered by this Directive, the emissions should be accounted under that activity where the CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere. To ensure that renewable fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuels contribute to greenhouse gas emission reductions and to avoid double counting for fuels that do so, it is appropriate to explicitly extend the empowerment in Article 14(1) to the adoption by the Commission of implementing acts laying down the necessary adjustments for how and where to account for the eventual release of carbon dioxide and how to avoid double counting to ensure appropriate incentives are in place for capturing the CO2, taking also into account the treatment of these fuels under Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
Amendment 130 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
Recital 42
Amendment 155 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) Innovation and development as well as demonstration and up-scaling of new low-carbon technologies in the sectors of buildings and road transport are crucial for ensuring the cost-efficient contribution of these sectors to the expected emission reductions. Therefore, 150 million allowances from emissions trading in the buildings and road transport sectors should also be made available to the Innovation Fund to stimulate the cost-efficient emission reductions.
Amendment 156 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The EU ETS should incentivise production from installations that partly or fully reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the description of some categories of activities in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC should be amended to ensure an equal treatment of installations in the sectors concerned. In addition, free allocation for the production of a product should be independent of the nature of the production process. It is therefore necessary to modify the definition of the products and of the processes and emissions covered for some benchmarks to ensure a level playing field for new and existing technologies. It is also necessary to decouple the update of the benchmark values for refineries and for hydrogen to reflect the increasing importance of production of hydrogen outside the refineries sectorCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 should be reviewed accordingly to take into account lower emissions associated with the low-carbon fuels.
Amendment 176 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Greenhouse gases that are not directly released into the atmosphere should be considered emissions under the EU ETS and allowances should be surrendered for those emissions unless they are stored in a storage site in accordance with Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , or they are permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use, or they are captured and used to produce recycled carbon fuels and renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts specifying the conditions where greenhouse gases are to be considered as permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use, including obtaining a carbon removal certificate, where appropriate, in view of regulatory developments with regard to the certification of carbon removals. _________________ 46Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114).
Amendment 181 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I
Annex I
(b) ‘emissions’ means the release into the atmosphere of greenhouse gases from sources in an installation or the release into the atmosphere from an aircraft performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I or from ships performing a maritime transport activity listed in Annex I of the gases specified in respect of that activity, or the release of greenhouse gases corresponding to the activity referred to in Annex III;”;
Amendment 206 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In the European Green Deal, the Commission stated its intention to take additional measures to address greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime transport sector through a basket of measures to enable the Union to reach its emissions reduction targets. In this context, Directive 2003/87/EC should be amended to include the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS in order to ensure this sector contributes to the increased climate objectives of the Union as well as to the objectives of the Paris Agreement, which requires developed countries to take the lead by undertaking economy-wide emission reduction targets, while developing countries are encouraged to move over time towards economy-wide emission reduction or limitation targets.49 Considering that emissions from international aviation outside Europe should be capped from January 2021 by global market-based action while there is no action in place that caps or prices maritime transport emissions, it is appropriatemight be highly detrimental that the EU ETS would covers a share of the emissions from voyages between a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and port under the jurisdiction of a third country, with the third country being able to decide on appropriate action in respect of the other share of emissions. The extension of the EU ETS to the maritime transport sector should thus include half of the emissions from ships performing voyages arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State from a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State, half of the emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State, emissions from ships performing voyages arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State, and emissions at berth in a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State. This approach has been noted as a practical way to solve the issue of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Capabilities, which has been a longstanding challenge in the UNFCCC context. The coverage of a share of the emissions from both incoming and outgoing voyages between the Union and third countries ensures the effectiveness of the EU ETS, notably by increasing the environmental impact of the measure compared to a geographical scope limited to voyages within the EU, while limiting the risk of evasive port calls and the risk of delocalisation of transhipment activities outside the Unionbecause it might cause a loss of competitiveness to our ports, especially in the transhipment sector. In addition, ships operating routes included in the Motorways of the Seas or granting territorial continuity as a public service to islands should not be considered in the scope of the EU ETS, in order to avoid the concrete risk of a modal backshift to more pollutant sectors in the former case, as well as the risk of endangering territorial continuity in the latter one. The extension of the EU ETS to the maritime transport sector should thus include half of the emissions from ships performing voyages arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State, and fifty percent of emissions at berth in a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State. To ensure a smooth inclusion of the sector in the EU ETS, the surrendering of allowances by shipping companies should be gradually increased with respect to verified emissions reported for the period 20238 to 202530. To protect the environmental integrity of the system, to the extent that fewer allowances are surrendered in respect of verified emissions for maritime transport during those years, once the difference between verified emissions and allowances surrendered has been established each year, a corresponding a number of allowances should be cancelled. As from 202631, shipping companies should surrender the number of allowances corresponding to all of their verified emissions reported in the preceding year. _________________ 49 Paris Agreement, Article 4(4).
Amendment 213 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1a
Article 9 – paragraph 1a
“In [the year following entry into force of this amendment], the Union-wide quantity of allowances shall be decreased by [-- million allowances (to be determined depending on year of entry into force)]. In the same year, the Union-wide quantity of allowances shall be increased by 79 million allowances for maritime transport. Starting in [the year following entry into force of this amendment], the linear factor shall be 4,2 %5.09% until 2030. The Commission shall publish the Union-wide quantity of allowances within 3 months of [date of entry into force of the amendment to be inserted].”;
Amendment 240 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 8(4)
Article 8(4)
Amendment 249 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Bearing in mind that this Directive amends Directive 2003/87/EC in respect of a period of implementation that has already started on 1 January 2021, for reasons of predictability, environmental effectiveness and simplicity, the steeper linear reduction pathway of the EU ETS should be a straight line from 2021 to 2030, such as to achieve emission reductions in the EU ETS of 61 % by 2030, as the appropriate intermediate step towards Union economy- wide climate neutrality in 2050. As the increased linear reduction factor can only apply from the year following the entry into force of this Directive, a one-off reduction of the quantity of allowances should reduce the total quantity of allowances so that it is in line with this level of annual reduction having been made from 2021 onwards.
Amendment 262 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
In order to provide further incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency, the determined Union- wide ex-ante benchmarks shall be reviewedsubjected to an extensive and comprehensive assessment by the European Commission to evaluate the need to review them before the period from 2026 to 2030 in view of potentially modifying the definitions and system boundaries of existing product benchmarks.
Amendment 266 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b – introductory part
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 1 a – new
Article 10 a – paragraph 1 a – new
(b) the following paragraph 1a is inserted: Free allocation at benchmark level shall be given in relation to the production of products listed in Annex I of Regulation [CBAM] until the full effectiveness of the CBAM in tackling the carbon leakage risk both on the EU market and on export markets is assessed and positively verified. To this purpose, in 2029 the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a report pursuant to Regulation [CBAM] regarding the effectiveness of the CBAM. The report shall also include the selected option to address the carbon leakage risk on export markets. The report by the Commission shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal to amend this article in view of gradually phasing out free allocation after 2030 proportionally to the proven level of effectiveness of the CBAM. Allowances resulting from the reduction of free allocation shall be made available to support innovation in relation to the production of products listed in Annex I of Regulation [CBAM] in accordance with Article 10a(8).
Amendment 267 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 1 a – new
Article 10 a – paragraph 1 a – new
Amendment 277 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
Amendment 292 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point c
(c) For the period from 2026 to 2030, the benchmark values shall be determined in the samIn order to provide further incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the steel industry, the manner as set out in points (a) and (d) on the basis of information submitted pursuant to Article 11 for the years 2021 and 2022 and on the basis of applying the annual reduction rate in respect of each year between 2008 and 2028ual reduction rate of the product benchmark hot metal calculated pursuant to the previous sub-paragraph shall not be affected by the modification of benchmark definitions and system boundaries pursuant to the fifth sub-paragraph of article 10a1 when the calculation of such rate is influenced by installations that were operational in the period referred to the first sub-paragraph of article 10a2.
Amendment 298 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – third paragraph – point d
Article 10 a – paragraph 2 – third paragraph – point d
(d) Where the annual reduction rate exceeds 2,5 % or is below 0,2 %, the benchmark values for the period from 2026 to 2030 shall be the benchmark values applicable in the period from 2013 to 2020 reduced by whichever of those two percentage rates is relevant, in respect of each year between 2008 and 2028. By way of derogation from the previous point, the maximum annual reduction rate of the fuel and heat fallback benchmarks shall remain at 1.6%.
Amendment 303 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), established under Regulation (EU) […./..] of the European Parliament and of the Council51 , is an alternative to free allocation to address the risk of carbon leakage. To the extent that sectors and subsectors are covered by that measure, they should not receive free allocation. However, a transitional phasing-out of free allowances as of 2030 is needed to allow producers, importers and traders to adjust to the new regime. The reduction of free allocation should be implemented by applying a factor to free allocation for CBAM sectors, while the CBAM is phased in. This percentage (CBAM factor) should be equal to 100 % during the transitional period between the entry into force of [CBAM Regulation] and 20259, 90 % in 202630 and should be reduced by 10 percentage points each year to reach 0 % and thereby eliminate free allocation by the tenth year. The relevant delegated acts on free allocation should be adjusted accordingly for the sectors and subsectors covered by the CBAM. The free allocation no longer provided to the CBAM sectors based on this calculation (CBAM demand) must be auctioned and the revenues will accrue to the Innovation Fund, so as to support innovation in low carbon technologies, carbon capture and utilisation (‘CCU’), carbon capture and geological storage (‘CCS’), renewable energy and energy storage, in a way that contributes to mitigating climate change. Special attention should be given to projects in CBAM sectors. To respect the proportion of the free allocation available for the non- CBAM sectors, the final amount to deduct from the free allocation and to be auctioned should be calculated based on the proportion that the CBAM demand represents in respect of the free allocation needs of all sectors receiving free allocation. Free allowances in sectors covered by the CBAM are phased out as of 2030 only provided that the CBAM has proved to be effective to prevent the risk of carbon leakage. _________________ 51 [please insert full OJ reference]
Amendment 311 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point e
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shouldall adopt financial measures in accordance with the second and fourth subparagraphs in favour of sectors or subsectors which are exposed to a genuine risk of carbon leakage due to significant indirect costs that are actually incurred from greenhouse gas emission costs passed on in electricity prices, provided that such financial measures are in accordance with State aid rules, and in particular do not cause undue distortions of competition in the internal market. The financial measures adopted should not compensate indirect costs covered by free allocation in accordance with the benchmarks established pursuant to paragraph 1. Where a Member State spends an amount higher than the equivalent of 25 % of their auction revenues of the year in which the indirect costs were incurred, it shall set out the reasons for exceeding that amount.
Amendment 315 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 a (new)
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Because third-country governments have still not limited or priced greenhouse gas emissions at the same levels as the EU, there is a difference in regulatory ambition that creates a risk of carbon leakage through the substitution of EU exports to third- country markets by products not subject to equivalent carbon limitation and pricing policies. In this situation, emissions limited in the EU would then be simply emitted in another third country, jeopardizing the EU’s overall objective to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 318 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 b (new)
Recital 30 b (new)
(30b) Therefore, allowance adjustments for the emissions embedded in the goods exported is justified as long as significant numbers of EU’s international partners have policy approaches that do not result in the same level of climate ambition as the Union, with a view to calibrate the regulatory obligation and the net regulatory burden imposed under the EU ETS. Allowances adjustments for exports should be introduced as of the start of the progressive phasing out of free allowances and should remain in force until other countries take equivalent and effective steps to impose carbon costs on competing foreign production, independently from any reduction commitments of free allowances under the EU ETS until other countries take equivalent and effective steps to impose carbon costs on competing production.
Amendment 320 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 330 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 a (new)
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) In order to reflect the actual technological progress within installations included in product benchmarks with consideration of fuel and electricity exchangeability in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/447 and where the share of indirect emissions is higher than 50 % of the relevant product benchmarks, the update of such benchmarks for the periods as of 2026 should not be affected by the evolution of the carbon intensity of the electricity mix.
Amendment 337 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 b (new)
Recital 31 b (new)
(31b) Where ex-ante benchmarks cannot be derived for an individual sector or subsector and allowances are allocated on the basis of generic fall back approaches, it is necessary to ensure that sectorial and geographical differences amongst the sectors and subsectors covered are nevertheless appropriately reflected. In developing implementing acts pursuant to Article 10a(2), the Commission should therefore ensure that sector specific fall back approaches are devised where needed to avoid discrimination between sectors.
Amendment 339 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
Article 10 a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 6
Projects shall be selected on the basis of objective and transparent criteria and on a technology-neutral basis, taking into account, where relevant, the extent to which projects contribute to achieving emission reductions well below the benchmarks referred to in paragraph 2. Projects shall have the potential for widespread application or to significantly lower the costs of transitioning towards a low-carbon economy in the sectors concerned. Projects involving CCU shall deliver a net reduction in emissions and ensure avoidance or permanent storage of CO2. In the case of grants provided through calls for proposals, up to 60 % of the relevant costs of projects may be supported, out of which up to 40 % need not be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, provided that pre-determined milestones, taking into account the technology deployed, are attained. In the case of support provided through competitive bidding and in the case of technical assistance support, up to 100 % of the relevant costs of projects may be supported.
Amendment 343 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC
The calls for proposal shall be open and transparent and clearly set out what kinds of technologies can be supported. The Commission shall take measures to ensure that the calls are communicated as widely as possible, and especially to SMEs.
Amendment 344 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 7 a
Article 10 a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 7 a
The Innovation Fund shall, where appropriate, ensure that there are effective synergies with other relevant Union funding instruments, such as Horizon Europe, and in particular with European partnerships.
Amendment 346 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12a) In order to avoid an adjustment of free allocation as of Article 10a (5), in addition to the flexibility provided in paragraph 5a, allowances in the market stability reserve shall be used corresponding to an amount of up to 5% of the total quantity of allowances.
Amendment 352 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The scope of the Innovation Fund referred to in Article 10a(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC should be extended to support innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes that concern the consumption of fuels in the sectors of buildings and road transport. In addition, the Innovation Fund should serve to support investments to decarbonise the maritime transport sector, including investments in sustainable alternative fuels, such as hydrogen and ammonia that are produced from renewables, as well as zero-emission propulsion technologies like wind technologies. Considering that revenues generated from penalties raised in Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]52 are allocated to the Innovation Fund as external assigned revenue in accordance with Article 21(5) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission should ensure that due consideration is given to support for innovative projects aimed at accelerating the development and deployment of renewable and low carbon fuels in the maritime sector, as specified in Article 21(1) of Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]. To ensure sufficient funding is available for innovation within this extended scope, the Innovation Fund should be supplemented with 50 million allowances, stemming partly from the allowances that could otherwise be auctioned, and partly from the allowances that could otherwise be allocated for free, in accordance with the current proportion of funding provided from each source to the Innovation Fund. _________________ 52[add ref to the FuelEU Maritime Regulation].
Amendment 353 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 d – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
Article 10 d – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
1. A fund to support investments proposed by the beneficiary Member States, including the financing of small- scale investment projects, including in regions and municipalities, to modernise energy systems and improve energy efficiency shall be established for the period from 2021 to 2030 (the ‘Modernisation Fund’). The Modernisation Fund shall be financed through the auctioning of allowances as set out in Article 10, for the beneficiary Member States set out therein.
Amendment 374 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) The scope of the Modernisation Fund should be aligned with the most recent climate objectives of the Union by requiring that investments are consistent with the objectives of the European Green Deal and Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, and eliminating the support to any investments related to fossil fuels. In addition, the percentage of the Modernisation Fund that needs to be devoted to priority investments should be increased to 80 %; energy efficiency should be targeted as a priority area at the demand side; and support of households to address energy poverty, including in rural and remote areas, should be included within the scope of the priority investments.
Amendment 392 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point e
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3 b – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 3 b – subparagraph 1
3b. An obligation to surrender allowances shall not arise in respect of emissions of greenhouse gases which are considered to have been captured and utilised to become permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use, and in respect of greenhouse gases that are captured and used to produce recycled carbon fuels and renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin.
Amendment 392 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) Renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuels can be important to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in sectors that are hard to decarbonise. Where recycled carbon fuels and renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin are produced from captured carbon dioxide under an activity covered by this Directive, the emissions should be accounted under thate activity where the CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere. To ensure that renewable fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuels contribute to greenhouse gas emission reductions and to avoid double counting for fuels that do so, it is appropriate to explicitly extend the empowerment in Article 14(1) to the adoption by the Commission of implementing acts laying down the necessary adjustments for how and where to account for the eventual release of carbon dioxide and how to avoid double counting to ensure appropriate incentives are in place for capturing CO2, taking also into account the treatment of these fuels under Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
Amendment 402 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) As carbon dioxide is also expected to be transported by means other than pipelines, such as by ship and by truck, the current coverage in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC for transport of greenhouse gases for the purpose of storage should be extended to all means of transport for reasons of equal treatment and irrespective of whether the means of transport are covered by the EU ETS. Where the emissions from the transport are also covered by another activity under Directive 2003/87/EC, the emissions should be accounted for under that other activity to prevent double counting. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 should be reviewed accordingly in order to reflect all modalities of CO2 transport.
Amendment 423 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) The Communication of the Commission on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition57 , underlined the particular challenge to reduce the emissions in the sectors of road transport and buildings. Therefore, the Commission announced that a further expansion of emissions trading could include emissions from road transport and buildings. Emissions trading for these two new sectors would be established through separate but adjacent emissions trading, ideally with a long-term aim to achieve convergence on a uniform and durable carbon price for the whole economy, once the abatement costs of different sectors will converge, in order to enable emission reductions at the lowest societal costs. Considering especially the vulnerable consumers and the risk of mobility poverty as a result of the proposed expansion of carbon pricing, the Commission should carefully assess the impact of the proposed regulation as well as the adequacy of the proposed mitigation measures. This would avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading in the sectors of stationary installations and aviation. The new system is accompanied by complementary policies and measures safeguarding against undue price impacts, shaping expectations of market participants and aiming for a carbon price signal for the whole economy. Previous experience has shown that the development of the new market requires setting up an efficient monitoring, reporting and verification system. In view of ensuring synergies and coherence with the existing Union infrastructure for the EU ETS covering the emissions from stationary installations and aviation, it is appropriate to set up emissions trading for the road transport and buildings sectors via an amendment to Directive 2003/87/ЕC. _________________ 57 COM(2020)562 final.
Amendment 433 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43 a (new)
Recital 43 a (new)
(43a) The possible further expansion of emissions trading for these two new sectors should not lead to the introduction of multiple additional CO2 taxes, charges and duties being levied on these sectors where such charge taxes and duties are already levied through other means.
Amendment 447 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex 1 – point 1
Annex 1 – point 1
1. Installations or parts of installations used for research, development and testing of new products and processes, and installations where emissions from the combustion of biomass that complies with the criteria set out pursuant to Article 14 contribute to more than 95 % of the total greenhouse gas emissionexclusively using biomass are not covered by this Directive.
Amendment 448 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44 a (new)
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) Given the slow development of and accessibility to low and zero emission vehicles in the various market segments of road transport and the millions of vehicles that would be affected by additional charges being introduced, for road transport, the system should be gradually introduced over a ten-year period once allowances and compliance obligations start in 2026. Re-evaluations should take place every two to three years. The starting point and the evaluation process should depend on a number of conditions, including the availability of alternative fuel technology, the speed in deploying sufficient numbers of alternative fuel light- and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as an alternative fuel infrastructure for the sector and its various niches.
Amendment 497 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 49 a (new)
Recital 49 a (new)
(49a) The eventual inclusion of road transport in the EU ETS should not lead to commercial road transport undertaking established in a non-member State being given more favourable treatment than commercial road transport undertaking established in a Member State.
Amendment 529 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 52
Recital 52
(52) The introduction of the carbon price in road transport and buildings should be accompanied by effective social compensation, especially in view of the already existing levels of energy poverty. About 34 million Europeans reported an inability to keep their homes adequately warm in 2018, and 6,9 % of the Union population have said that they cannot afford to heat their home sufficiently in a 2019 EU-wide survey60 . To achieve an effective social and distributional compensation, Member States should be required to spend the auction revenues on the climate and energy-related purposes already specified for the existing emissions trading, but also for measures added specifically to address related concerns for the new sectors of road transport and buildings, including related policy measures under Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council61 . Auction revenues should be used to address social aspects of the emission trading for the new sectors with a specific emphasis in vulnerable households, micro, small and medium- sized-enterprises and transport users. In this spirit, a new Social Climate Fund will provide dedicated funding to Member States to support the European citizens most affected or at risk of energy or mobility poverty. This Fund will promote fairness and solidarity between and within Member States while mitigating the risk of energy and mobility poverty during the transition. It will build on and complement existing solidarity mechanisms. The resources of the new Fund will in principle correspond to 25 % of the expected revenues from new emission trading in the period 2026-2032, and will be implemented on the basis of the Social Climate Plans that Member States should put forward under Regulation (EU) 20…/nn of the European Parliament and the Council62 . In addition, each Member State should use their auction revenues inter alia to finance a part of the costs of their Social Climate Plans. _________________ 60 Data from 2018. Eurostat, SILC [ilc_mdes01]. 61Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1–56). 62[Add ref to the Regulation establishing the Social Climate Fund].
Amendment 588 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 58
Recital 58
(58) The application of emissions trading in the buildings and road transport sectors should be monitored by the Commission, including the degree of price convergence with the existing ETS, and, if necessary, a review should be proposed to the European Parliament and the Council to improve the effectiveness, administration and practical application of emissions trading for those sectors on the basis of acquired knowledge as well as increased price convergence. The Commission should be required to submit the first report on those matters by 1 January 2028 and every two years thereafter.
Amendment 632 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 67
Recital 67
(67) It is necessary to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended to modify the threshold set out in that Regulation from 5 000 GT of size to 5 000 Kw of engine propulsion, in order to take into account all the relevant emitters in maritime sector. Moreover, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended to oblige companies to report aggregated emissions data at company level and to submit for approval their verified monitoring plans and aggregated emissions data at company level to the responsible administering authority. In addition, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts to amend the methods for monitoring CO2 emissions and the rules on monitoring, as well as any other relevant information set out in Regulation (EU) 2015/757, to ensure the effective functioning of the EU ETS at administrative level and to supplement Regulation (EU) 2015/757 with the rules for the approval of monitoring plans and changes thereof by administering authorities, with the rules for the monitoring, reporting and submission of the aggregated emissions data at company level and with the rules for the verification of the aggregated emissions data at company level and for the issuance of a verification report in respect of the aggregated emissions data at company level. The data monitored, reported and verified under Regulation (EU) 2015/757 might also be used for the purpose of compliance with other Union law requiring the monitoring, reporting and verification of the same ship information.
Amendment 662 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) ‘shipping company’ means the shipowner or any other organisation or person, such as the manager or the bareboat charterer, that has assumed the responsibility for the operation of the ship from the shipowner and that, on assuming such responsibility, has agreed to take over the duty to comply, entirely or partially, with this Directive as well as all the duties and responsibilities imposed by the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council(*); _______________ (*) Regulation (EC) No 336/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 on the implementation of the International Safety Management Code within the Community and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 3051/95 (OJ L 64, 4.3.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 684 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3a – paragraph 1
Article 3a – paragraph 1
Articles 3b to 3f shall apply to the allocation and issue of allowances in respect of the aviation activities listed in Annex I. Articles 3g to 3ge shall apply in respect of the maritime transport activities listed in Annex I, with the exception of ships operating routes included in the Motorways of the Seas or performing services of general economic interest (SGEI) under public service obligations(PSOs), including granting territorial continuity.
Amendment 691 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3g – paragraph 1
Article 3g – paragraph 1
1. The allocation of allowances and the application of surrender requirements in respect of maritime transport activities shall apply in respect of fifty percent (50 %) of theCO2 emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State, fifty percent (50 %) of the emissions from ships performing voyage departing from a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State, one hundred percent (100 %) of emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and one hundredunder the jurisdiction of a Member State and fifty percent (1050 %) of CO2 emissions from ships at berth in a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Amendment 702 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3g – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 3g – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. If a thorough ex ante impact assessment regarding the risks of cargo diversion establishes that no major negative impacts on EEA port activities are expected, the Commission shall propose an amendment to this Directive aiming at applying the allocation of allowances of X percent (X%) of the emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a third country port and X percent (X %) of the emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a third country port and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Amendment 706 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3g – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 3g – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The Commission shall pursue with the establishment of global market-based measure in partnership with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in order to extend the scope of the EU ETS for maritime transport to cover the CO2emissions released from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Members State and the emissions from ships at berth in a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Amendment 709 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3g – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 3g – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. The Commission shall pursue with the establishment of global market-based measure in partnership with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in order to extend the scope of the EU ETS for maritime transport to cover the CO2 emissions from ships performing voyages departing from a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State and emissions from ships performing voyages from a port outside the jurisdiction of a Member State and arriving at a port under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Amendment 719 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 20 % of verified emissions reported for 20236;
Amendment 723 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 45 % of verified emissions reported for 20247;
Amendment 728 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) 70 % of verified emissions reported for 20258;
Amendment 735 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 3ga – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) 100 % of verified emissions reported for 20269 and each year thereafter.
Amendment 741 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ga – paragraph 2
Article 3ga – paragraph 2
To the extent that fewer allowances are surrendered compared to the verified emissions from maritime transport for the years 20236, 20247 and 20258, once the difference between verified emissions and allowances surrendered has been established in respect of each year, a corresponding quantity of allowances shall be cancelled rather than auctioned pursuant to Article 10. The phasing in of the EU ETS for the maritime sector shall be conditional on a full assessment to be conducted before 2025 that ascertain the availability of alternative fuels and technologies and an adequate infrastructural network in each Member State. Based on the above assessment, the phasing-in shall be further postponed and/or differentiated geographically based on the effective availability of alternative fuels and technologies at national level. By way of derogation, regular passenger and ferry services engaged in cabotage and island cabotage operations in the Mediterranean Sea shall be temporarily exempted until a full assessment demonstrates the availability of alternative fuels and technologies in the areas concerned.
Amendment 756 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3gd a (new)
Article 3gd a (new)
Article 3gda Maritime Transition Fund The Commission shall establish a dedicated Maritime Transport Fund to support and accelerate projects, investments and innovations in the EU maritime sector. At least 75 % of the revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances referred to in Article 3g shall be allocated to this Fund. The dedicated Fund shall support and facilitate the transition to energy efficient and climate resilient EU maritime sector, providing funding to companies for technological, fleet renewal and retrofitting investments as well as to support improvement of the energy efficiency of ships and ports and the deployment of the necessary infrastructure for decarbonising the maritime transport sector. The remained 25 % of revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances shall be allocated to the Innovation Fund, in order to support the deployment and realization of intermodal projects, shift to rail and combined transport within the ports included in the TEN-T core network.
Amendment 774 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 3ge – paragraph 2
Article 3ge – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall monitor the implementation of this Chapter and possible trends as regards companies seeking to avoid being bound by the requiremennd adverse impacts as regards, inter alia, possible transport cost increases, port evasion and shift of transhipment hubs, the competitiveness of the maritime sector in the Member States, taking account of the specificities of each fleet segment companies seeking. Particular attention shall be paid to the adverse impacts ofn this Directive. If appropriate, the Commission shall propose measures to prevent such avoidance.;ose shipping services that provide essential services of “territorial continuity”. All potential impacts shall be assessed considering the aggregated effects of the different policy measures under the Fit for 55 package as well as the specific impacts in each Member State. The Commission shall propose measures to prevent such adverse impacts and develop adequate support mechanisms.
Amendment 781 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2003/87/CE
Article 3ge – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3ge – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Every year over a period of five years as from the entry into force of the EU ETS, the Commission shall evaluate the impact of ETS on EU ports exposed to competition from non-EU ports. A list of carbon leakage. Should the cargo diversion be caused by the introduction of EU ETS, the Commission shall compensate the loss of competitiveness through additional funding for port infrastructure and for superstructure such as new clean mobile service equipment.
Amendment 810 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
In [the year following entry into force of this amendment], the Union-wide quantity of allowances shall be decreased by [-- million allowances (to be determined depending on year of entry into force)]. In the same year, the Union-wide quantity of allowances shall be increased by 79 million[number corresponding to scope of application to maritime transport activities as set out in Article 3g of Directive 2003/87/EC] allowances for maritime transport. Starting in [the year following entry into force of this amendment], the linear factor shall be 4,2 %. The Commission shall publish the Union-wide quantity of allowances within 3 months of [date of entry into force of the amendment to be inserted].;
Amendment 831 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3a
In addition, 2,5 % of the total quantity of allowances between [year following the entry into force of the Directive] and 2030 shall be auctioned for the Modernisation Fund, with a possibility to increase the share if justified by thorough analysis in order to meet modernisation needs of the beneficiary Member States. The beneficiary Member States for this amount of allowances shall be the Member States with a GDP per capita at market prices below 65 % of the Union average during the period 2016 to 2018. The funds corresponding to this quantity of allowances shall be distributed in accordance with Part B of Annex IIb.
Amendment 874 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point h
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point h
Amendment 910 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point d a (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(da) the following paragraph is inserted: “4a. In order to respect the auctioning share set out in Article 10, for every year in which the sum of free allocations does not reach the maximum amount that respects the auctioning share, the remaining allowances up to that amount shall be used to prevent or limit reduction of free allocations to respect the auctioning share in later years. Where, nonetheless, the maximum amount is reached, free allocations shall be adjusted accordingly. Any such adjustment shall be done in a uniform manner. By way of derogation from previous subparagraph, an additional amount of up to 5 % of the total quantity of allowances shall, to the extent necessary, be used to increase the maximum amount available under paragraph 5. Where less than 5 % of the total quantity of allowances is needed to increase the maximum amount available under the first subparagraph: a maximum of 50 million allowances shall be used to increase the amount of allowances available to support innovation in accordance with Article 10a(8); and a maximum of 0,5 % of the total quantity of allowances shall be used to increase the amount of allowances available to modernise the energy systems of certain Member States in accordance with Article 10d.”
Amendment 930 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
Amendment 943 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
“In the case of installations covered by the obligation to conduct an energy audit under Article 8(4) of Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(*) [Article reference to be updated with the revised Directive], free allocation shall only be granted fully if, following an appeal procedure, the recommendations of the audit report are implemented within a period of 3 years, to the extent that the pay- back time for the relevant investments does not exceed fivthree years and that the costs of those investments are proportionate. Otherwise, the amount of free allocation shall be reduced byproportionately to the amount of emissions corresponding to the recommendations of the report, and in any event by not more than 25 %. The amount of free allocation shall not be reduced if an operator demonstrates that it has implemented or is implementing other measures which lead to greenhouse gas emission reductions equivalent to those recommended by the audit report. The measures referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adjusted accordingly.
Amendment 945 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a
1. In the case of installations covered by the obligation to conduct an energy audit under Article 8(4) of Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(*) [Article reference to be updated with the revised Directive], free allocation shall onlymay not be granted fully if the recommendations of the audit report are not fully implemented within a period of five years or at the earliest reasonable opportunity in case the project requires a scheduled downtime of the installation, to the extent that the pay- back time for the relevant investments does not exceed five years and that the costs of those investments areis proportionate. Otherwise, the amount of free allocation shallmay be reduced by 25 %up to 25 % proportionally to the direct emissions related to the not implemented investments. The amount of free allocation shall not be reduced if an operator demonstrates that it has implemented other measures which lead to greenhouse gas emission reductions equivalent to those recommended by the audit report. The measures referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adjusted accordingly.
Amendment 961 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2b
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2b
Amendment 972 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 983 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
In order to provide further incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency, the determined Union- wide ex-ante benchmarks shall be reviewedsubjected to an extensive and comprehensive assessment by the Commission to evaluate the need to review them before the period from 2026 to 2030 in view of potentially modifying the definitions and system boundaries of existing product benchmarks.;
Amendment 993 #
2021/0211(COD)
(iia) the following subparagraph is inserted after the third subparagraph: “To ensure a gradual transition from the current system of free allowances to the Regulation (EU) …./.. [reference to CBAM], the CBAM should be progressively phased in while free allowances in sectors covered by the CBAM are progressively phased out as of 2030, only provided that the CBAM has proved to be effective to prevent the risk of carbon leakage both for imports and exports.”
Amendment 1002 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 1
Article 10a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 1
Amendment 1017 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Amendment 1029 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a –paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2
Article 10a –paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2
Amendment 1038 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a - paragraph 1a - subparagraph 2
Article 10a - paragraph 1a - subparagraph 2
By way of derogation from the previous subparagraph, for the first years of operation of Regulation [CBAM] and until 2030, the production of these products shall benefit from free allocation. As of 2030, the production of these products shall benefit from free allocation in reduced amounts. A factor reducing the free allocation for the production of these products shall be applied (CBAM factor). The CBAM factor shall be equal to 100 % for the period during the entry into force of [CBAM regulation] and the end of 20259, 90 % in 202630 and shall be reduced by 10 percentage points each year to reach 0 % by the tenth year.
Amendment 1041 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a - paragraph 1a - subparagraph 2
Article 10a - paragraph 1a - subparagraph 2
Amendment 1055 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 3
The reduction of free allocation shall be calculated annually as the average share of the demand for free allocation for the production of products listed in Annex I of Regulation [CBAM] compared to the calculated total free allocation demand for all installations, for the relevant period referred to in Article 11, paragraph 1. The CBAM factor shall be appliedport by the Commission shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal to amend this article in view of gradually phasing out free allocation after 2030proportionally to the proven level of effectiveness of the CBAM.
Amendment 1071 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 4
Allowances resulting from the reduction of free allocation shall be made available to support innovation in relation to the production of products listed in Annex I of Regulation [CBAM] in accordance with Article 10a(8).;
Amendment 1075 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b a (new)
(ba) the following paragraph is inserted: “1aa. As of the start of the progressive phasing the export of products subject to Regulation (EU) …/… [CBAM] shall be entitled to benefit from adjustment allowances for the emissions embedded in the goods exported, the number of which will calibrate the regulatory obligation and the net regulatory burden imposed under the EU ETS. These adjustment allowances shall be deducted from the annual amount of allowances above the benchmark to be surrendered to the competent authority.”
Amendment 1099 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 - point d
Article 10a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 - point d
(d) Where the annual reduction rate exceeds 2,5 % or is below 0,2 %, the benchmark values for the period from 2026 to 2030 shall be the benchmark values applicable in the period from 2013 to 2020 reduced by whichever of those two percentage rates is relevant, in respect of each year between 2008 and 2028. By way of derogation from the previous point, the maximum annual reduction rate of the fuel and heat fall back benchmarks shall remain at 1,6 % .;
Amendment 1103 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point ii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 - point d
Article 10a – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 3 - point d
(d) Where the annual reduction rate exceeds 2,51,6 % or is below 0,2 %, the benchmark values for the period from 2026 to 2030 shall be the benchmark values applicable in the period from 2013 to 2020 reduced by whichever of those two percentage rates is relevant, in respect of each year between 2008 and 2028.;
Amendment 1116 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c – point iii
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
By way of derogation regarding the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas, those benchmark values shall be adjusted by the same percentage as the refineries benchmarks in order to preserve a level playing field for producers of those products.;
Amendment 1124 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d a (new)Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d a (new)Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraphs 5a and 5b
(da) paragraphs 5a and 5b are replaced by the following: “5a. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, an additional amount of up to 35% of the total quantity of allowances shall, to the extent necessary, be used to increase the maximum amount available under paragraph 5. Where the maximum amount available under paragraph 5, further increased as per the previous subparagraph, is not sufficient to avoid the adjustment referred to therein, unallocated allowances from the market stability reserve shall be used to the extent necessary. Alternative 3 % remains as in the current text and the Market Stability Reserve related amendment addresses the issue on its own. 5b. Where less than 3%5 % [optional] of the total quantity of allowances is needed to increase the maximum amount available under paragraph 5: - a maximum of 5100 million allowances shall be used to increase the amount of allowances available to support innovation in accordance with Article 10a(8); and - a maximum of 0,5 % of the total quantity of allowances shall be used to increase the amount of allowances available to modernise the energy systems of certain Member States in accordance with Article 10d.”
Amendment 1152 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point e
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The list of sectors or subsectors considered as exposed to a genuine risk of carbon leakage due to significant indirect costs shall be determined following the methodology foreseen under Article 10(b)1.Accordingly, sectors and subsectors in relation to which the product resulting from multiplying their intensity of trade by their indirect emission intensity, divided by their gross value added, exceeds 0,2, shall be deemed to be at risk of indirect carbon leakage. Furthermore the determination of eligibility shall include qualitative assessments, taking into account the criteria mentioned in Articles 10b(2), points (a), (b) and (c), and assessments at a 6-digit or an 8-digit level(Prodcom) for sectors for which the above mentioned product does not exceed 0,2but exceeds 0,15 and for sectors that have previously been assessed at Prodcom level in the context of Article 10b.;
Amendment 1175 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 1177 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
.Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
.Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
In addition, 50 milliona comprehensive assessment shall be carried out to examine the need for additional resources to strengthen the Innovation Fund in order to meet the objectives of the European Green Deal and Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, which shall stem from the unallocated allowances from the market stability reserve. These shall supplement any remaining revenues from the 300 million allowances available in the period from 2013 to 2020 under Commission Decision 2010/670/EU(*), and shall be used in a timely manner for innovation support as referred to in the first subparagraph. Furthermore, the external assigned revenues referred to in Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) [FuelEU Maritime] shall be allocated to the Innovation Fund and implemented in line with this paragraph.
Amendment 1188 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
The Innovation Fund shall cover the sectors listed in Annex I and Annex III, including environmentally safe carbon capture and utilisation (“CCU”) that contributes substantially to mitigating climate change, alternative fuels such as LNG or zero-emission fuels such as ammonia or hydrogen, as well as products substituting carbon intensive ones produced in sectors listed in Annex I, and to help stimulate the construction and operation of projects aimed at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage (“CCS”) of CO2, as well as of innovative renewable energy and energy storage technologies; in geographically balanced locations. The Innovation Fund may also support break- through innovative technologies and infrastructure to decarbonise the maritime sector and for the production of low- and zero-carbon fuels in aviation, rail and road transport. Special attention shall be given to projects in sectors covered by the [CBAM regulation] to support innovation in low carbon technologies, CCU, CCS, renewable energy and energy storage, in a way that contributes to mitigating climate change.
Amendment 1247 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 10d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The investments supported shall be consistent with the aims of this Directive, as well as the objectives of the Communication from the Commission of 11 December 2019 on The European Green Deal (*) and Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (**) and the long-term objectives as expressed in the Paris Agreement. No support from the Modernisation Fund shall be provided to energy generation facilities that use fossil fuelA technology neutral approach shall be applied in order to achieve the most cost- effective emissions reductions.;
Amendment 1250 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC
A list of installations covered by this Directive for the five years beginning on 1 January 2021 shall be submitted by 30 September 2019, and lists for each subsequent period of five years shall be submitted every five years thereafter. Each list shall include information on production activity, transfers of heat and gases, electricity production and emissions at sub-installation level over the five calendar years preceding its submission. For each five years allocation period starting from the 1January 2026, the calculation of free allocations shall be based on the median of the activity level of the five calendar years referred to in the previous sentence. Free allocations shall only be given to installations where such information is provided.
Amendment 1262 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10d – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10d – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the generation and use of electricity from renewable and low-carbon sources;
Amendment 1316 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point c
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) each shipping company surrenders a number of allowances equal to its total emissions during the preceding calendar year, as verified in accordance with Article 3gc. Without prejudice to Article 3gc, the following classes of vessels shall be subject to a method for surrendering and an adjusted number of allowances: (i) Ice-breakers; (ii) Ro/Ro and Ro/Pax; (iii) ships included in the scope of this Directive that are propelled, entirely or partially, by LNG and built after 2020.
Amendment 1337 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point e Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point e Directive 2003/87/EC
An obligation to surrender allowances shall not arise in respect of emissions of greenhouse gases which are considered to have been captured and utilised to become permanently chemically bound in a product so that they do not enter the atmosphere under normal use and in respect of greenhouse gases that are captured and used to produce recycled carbon fuels and renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin.
Amendment 1379 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
(19a) In Article 27, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. Following consultation with the operator, Member States may exclude from the EU ETS installations which have reported to the competent authority emissions of less than 250 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent and, where they carry out combustion activities, have a rated thermal input below 35 MW, excluding emissions from biomass, in each of the three years preceding the notification under point (a), and which are subject to measures that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions, if the Member State concerned complies with the following conditions: (a) it notifies the Commission of each such installation, specifying the equivalent measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions that are in place, before the list of installations pursuant to Article 11(1) has to be submitted and at the latest when this list is submitted to the Commission; (b) it confirms that monitoring arrangements are in place to assess whether any installation emits 250 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year. Member States may allow simplified monitoring, reporting and verification measures for installations with average annual verified emissions between 2008 and 2010 which are below 5 000 tonnes a year, in accordance with Article 14; (c) it confirms that if any installation emits 250 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year or the measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions are no longer in place, the installation will be reintroduced into the EU ETS ; (d) it publishes the information referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) for public comment. Hospitals may also be excluded if they undertake equivalent measures. ” Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087- 20210101&qid=1641400487702)
Amendment 1409 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Chapter IV a
Chapter IV a
Amendment 1438 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 30 c – paragraph 1
Article 30 c – paragraph 1
1. The Union-wide quantity of allowances issued under this Chapter each year from 2026 shall decrease in a linear manner beginning in 2024. The 2024 value shall be defined as the 2024 emissions limits, calculated on the basis of the reference emissions under Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council(*) for the sectors covered by this Chapter and applying the linear reduction trajectory for all emissions within the scope of that Regulation. The quantity shall decrease each year after 2024 by a linear reduction factor of 5,15 %. For road transport, the speed of the linear reduction trajectory and the price of the emission allowances shall be determined by a number of conditions, including the availability of alternative fuel technology, the speed in deploying sufficient numbers of alternative fuel light- and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as an alternative fuel infrastructure for the road transport sector and its various niches. By 1 January 2024, the Commission shall publish the Union-wide quantity of allowances for the year 2026.
Amendment 1446 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 30 c – paragraph 2
Article 30 c – paragraph 2
2. The Union-wide quantity of allowances issued under this Chapter each year from 2028 shall decrease in a linear manner beginning from 2025 on the basis of the average emissions reported under this Chapter for the years 2024 to 2026. The quantity of allowances shall decrease by a linear reduction factor of 5,43 %, except if the conditions of point 1 of Annex IIIa apply, in which case, the quantity shall decrease with a linear reduction factor adjusted in accordance with the rules set out in point 2 of Annex IIIa. For road transport, the speed of the linear reduction trajectory and the price of the emission allowances shall be determined by a number of conditions, including the availability of alternative fuel technology, the speed in deploying sufficient numbers of alternative fuel light- and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as an alternative fuel infrastructure for the road transport sector and its various niches By 30 June 2027, the Commission shall publish the Union-wide quantity of allowances for the year 2028 and, if required, the adjusted linear reduction factor.
Amendment 1479 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 30 e – paragraph 2
Article 30 e – paragraph 2
Amendment 1527 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 30 i – paragraph 1
Article 30 i – paragraph 1
By 1 January 2028, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the provisions of this Chapter with regard to their effectiveness, administration and practical application, including on the application of the rules under Decision (EU) 2015/1814 and use of allowances of this Chapter to meet compliance obligations of the compliance entities covered by Chapters II, IIa and III. Where appropriate, the Commission shall accompany this report with a proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Chapter. By 31 October 2031 the Commission should assess the impact of the regulation on the new emissions trading for road transport and buildings, as well as adequacy of the proposed mitigation measures, and feasibility of integrating the sectors covered by Annex III in the Emissions Trading System covering the sectors listed in annex 1 of Directive 2003/87/EC.’’;
Amendment 1592 #
2021/0211(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/757
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Amendment 173 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Maritime transport accounts for around 75% of EU external trade and 31% of EU internal trade in terms of volume. At the same time, ship traffic to or from ports in the European Economic Area accounts for some 11% of all EU CO2 emissions from transport and 3-4% of total EU CO2 emissions. 400 million passengers embark or disembark annually in ports of Member States, including around 14 million on cruise ships. Maritime transport is therefore an essential component of Europe’s transport system and plays a critical role for the European economy, especially in the post-pandemic scenario. The maritime transport market is subject to strong and sometimes unfair competition between economic actors in the Union and beyond for which a level playing field is indispensable. The stability and prosperity of the maritime transport market and its economic actors rely on a clear, predictable, stable and harmonised policy framework where maritime transport operators, ports and other actors in the sector can operate on the basis of equal opportunities. Where market distortions occur, they risk putting ship operators, or ports at a disadvantage compared to competitors within the maritime transport sector or in other transport sectors. In turn, this can result in a loss of competitiveness of the maritime transport industry, and a loss of connectivity for citizenustomers and businesses. Maritime transport remains a key asset to connect islands and peripheral areas of the continent.
Amendment 177 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) To enhance the Union’s climate commitment under the Paris Agreement and set out the steps to be taken to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, and to translate the political commitment into a legal obligation, the Commission adopted the (amended) proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law)19 as well as the Communication ‘Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition’20 . This also integrates the target of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% compared to 1990 levels by 2030. Accordingly, various complementary policy instruments are needed to motivate the use and production of sustainably produced renewable and low-carbon fuels, included in the maritime transport sector. The necessary technology development and deployment has to happen by 2030in due time to prepare for much more rapid change thereafter. _________________ 19 COM(2020) 563 final 20 COM(2020) 562 final
Amendment 183 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In the context of fuel transition to renewable and low carbon fuels and substitute sources of energy, it is essential to ensure the proper functioning of and fair competition in the EU maritime transport market regarding marine fuels, which account for a substantial share of ship operators’ costs. Differences in fuel requirements across Member States of the Union can significantly affect ship operators’ economic performance and negatively impact competition in the market. Due to the international nature of shipping, ship operators may easily bunker in third countries and carry large amounts of fuel. This may lead to carbon leakage and detrimental effects on the competitiveness of the sector if the availability of renewable and low carbon fuels in maritime ports under the jurisdiction of a Member State is not accompanied by requirements for their use that apply to all ship operators arriving at and departing from ports under the jurisdiction of Member States. This Regulation should lay down measures to ensure that the penetration and development of renewable low-carbon fuels in the marine fuels market takes place under the conditions of fair competition on the EU maritime transport market.
Amendment 191 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The rules laid down in this Regulation should apply in a non- discriminatory manner to all ships regardless of their flag. For reasons of coherence with Union and international rules in the area of maritime transport, this Regulation should not apply to warshipmilitary and police units, naval auxiliaries, fish- catching or fish- processing ships, or government ships used for non-commercial purposes.
Amendment 195 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The development and deployment of new fuels and energy solutions requires a coordinated and pragmatic approach to match supply, demand and the provision of appropriate distribution infrastructure. Appropriate incentives and economies of scale on the supply side will facilitate further developments of these new fuels. While the current European regulatory framework already partly addresses fuel production with Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 and distribution with Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council23 , there is also a need for a tool that establishes increasing levels of demand of renewable and low-carbon maritime fuels. _________________ 22Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2001, p. 82). 23 Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (OJ L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 197 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) While instruments such as carbon pricing or targets on the carbon intensity of activity promote improvements in energy efficiency, they are not suited to bring about a significant shift towards renewable and low-carbon fuels in the short and medium term. A specific regulatory approach dedicated to the deployment of renewable and low-carbon marine fuels and substitute sources of energy, such as wind or electricity, is therefore necessary, even if some of these technologies should be further researched.
Amendment 201 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Whilst there may then be a tendency to favour these new, potentially better or more promising solutions, the investments made in the former technologies, fuels or other solutions still need to be honoured and protected in that the investments made in these “former” technologies, fuels or solutions need to be returned. For these reasons, there is need for the waterborne sector in Europe to be granted the necessary legal certainty that is a prerequisite to achieve the EU Green Deal targets.
Amendment 204 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Policy interventionConsidering that in the short term many zero-emissions technologies will not be immediately available and affordable, it is crucial to promote initiatives to stimulate demand of renewable and low- carbon maritime fuels should be goal-based and respect the principle of technological neutrality. Accordingly, limits should be set on the greenhouse gas intensity of the energy used on-board by ships without prescribing the use of any particular fuel or technology.
Amendment 205 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Development and deployment of renewable and low carbon fuels with a high potential for sustainability, commercial maturity and a high potential for innovation and growth to meet future needs should be promoted, also establishing a clear and predictable legal framework for producers, suppliers and operators. This will support creating innovative and competitive fuels markets and ensure sufficient supply of sustainable maritime fuels in the short and long term to contribute to Union transport decarbonisation ambitions, while strengthening Union’s efforts towards a high level of environmental protection. For this purpose, LNG and other sustainable maritime fuels produced from feedstock listed in Parts A and B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, as well as synthetic maritime fuels should be eligible. In particular, LNG and other sustainable maritime fuels produced from feedstock listed in Part B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 are essential, as currently the most commercially mature technology to decarbonise martime transport already in the short term.
Amendment 212 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) However, this approach must be stricter in the maritime sector. The maritime sector has currently insignificant levels of demand for food and feed crops- based biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, since over 99% of currently used marine fuels are of fossil origin. Therefore, the non-eligibility of food and feed crop- based fuels under this Regulation also minimises any risk to slow down the decarbonisation of the transport sector, which could otherwise result from a shift of crop-based biofuels from the road to the maritime sector. It is essential to minimise such a shift, as road transport currently remains by far the most polluting transport sector and the maritime transport currently uses predominanetly fuels of fossil origin. It is therefore appropriate to avoid the creation of a potentially large demand of food and feed crops-based biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels by promoting their use under this Regulation. Accordingly, the additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity caused by all types of feed and food crop- based fuels require that these fuels be considered to have the same emission factors as the least favourable pathway.
Amendment 215 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The long lead times and the high costs associated to the development and deployment of new fuels and energy solutions for maritime transport require rapid action and the establishment of a clear and predictable long-term regulatory framework facilitating planning and investment from all the stakeholders concerned. A clear and stable long-term regulatory framework will facilitate, agreed with the stakeholders, will be crucial for the development and deployment of new fuels and energy solutions for maritime transport, and encourage investment from stakeholders. Such framework should define limits for the greenhouse gas intensity of the energy used on-board by ships until 2050. Those limits should become more ambitious over time to reflect the expected technology development and increased production of marine renewable and low carbon fuels.
Amendment 217 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) To encourage the entire waterborne sector to invest significantly in the transformation of waterborne transport into a zero-emission mode of transport, investments need to be underpinned by a legal framework that offers legal certainty to the entire sector, including to the European Maritime Technology Sector.
Amendment 218 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 b (new)
Recital 14 b (new)
(14 b) Due to the longevity of maritime technology, maritime stakeholders, including shipyards and maritime equipment manufacturers, deserve protection in terms of legal certainty, in particular first movers investing in innovative technologies and/or in new fuels. The rationale therefor is that the transition towards zero-emission waterborne transport and towards a zero- emission maritime (technology) sector will face rapidly changing state-of-the-art technologies, alternative fuels or other zero-emission solutions offering new superior pathways compared to recent solutions.
Amendment 230 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The future use of renewable energy sources and alternative propulsion, such as wind and solar energy, could be a possible solution to greatly reduces the greenhouse gas intensity of the overall ship energy use. The difficulty to accurately measure and quantify these energy sources (intermittence of the energy use, direct transfer as propulsion, etc.) should not impede their recognition in the overall ship energy use through means of approximations of their contribution to the ship’s energy balance.
Amendment 232 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Air pollution produced by ships (sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter) at berth is a significant concern for coastal areas and port cities. Therefore, specific and stringent obligations should be imposdeveloped to reduce emissions at berth from ships that draw power from their engines during their stay in port. According to the data collected within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in 2018, passenger ships and containerships are the ship categories producing the highest amount of emissions per ship at berth. Accordingly, emissions from these categories of ships should be addressed as a priority, providing, at the same time, enough and specific infrastructures.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The use of on-shore power supply (OPS) abates air pollution produced by ships as well as reduces the amount of GHG emissions generated by maritime transport. OPS represents an increasingly clean power supply available to ships at berth, in view of the growing renewables share in the EU electricity mix. While only the provision on OPS connection points is covered by Directive 2014/94/EU (Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive – AFID), the demand for and, as a result, the deployment of this technology has remained limited. Therefore specific rules and incentives should be established to mandatedevelop the use of OPS by the most polluting ships.
Amendment 250 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Certification of fuels is essential to achieve the objectives of this Regulation and guarantee the environmental integrity of the renewable and low-carbon fuels that are expected to be deployed in the maritime sector. Such certification should be undertaken by means of a transparent, standardised and non-discriminatory procedure. With a view to facilitating certification and limiting the administrative burden, the certification of biofuels, biogas, renewable fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuel should rely on the rules established by Directive (EU) 2018/2001. This approach of certification should also apply to fuels bunkered outside the Union, which should be considered as imported fuels, in a similar way as Directive (EU) 2018/2001. When companies intend to depart from the default values provided for by that Directive or this new framework, this should only be done when values can be certified by one of the voluntary schemes recognised under Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (for well-to-tank values) or by means of laboratory testing or direct emissions measurements (tank-to-wake).
Amendment 251 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) Compliance with this Regulation would depend on elements that could be beyond control of the company, such as issues related to fuel availability or fuel quality. Therefore, companies should be allowed the flexibility of rolling-over a compliance surplus from one year to another or borrowing an advance compliance surplus, within certain limits, from the following year. The use of OPS (or other low-emission technologies) at berth, being of high importance for local air quality in port cities and coastal areas should not be eligible for similar flexibility provisions.
Amendment 254 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) The revenues generated from the payment of penalties should be usedentirely reinvested in the shipbuilding sector, to promote the distribution and use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in the maritime sector and help maritime operators to meet their climate and environmental goals. The revenues should also be devoted to the necessary deployment of the distribution, storage and bunkering infrastructure of future sustainable alternative fuels. For this purpose these revenues should be allocated to the the Innovation Fund referred to in Article 10a(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Amendment 262 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) Given the international dimension of the maritime sector, a global approach to limiting the greenhouse gas intensity of the energy used by ships is preferable as it could be regarded as more effective due to its broader scope. In this context, and with a view to facilitating the development of international rules within the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the Commission should share relevant information on the implementation of this Regulation with the IMO and other relevant international bodies and relevant submissions should be made to the IMO. Where an agreement on a global aproach is reached on matters of relevance to this Regulation, the Commission should review the present Regulation with a view to aligning it, where appropriate, with the international rules. This review, on the basis of an active monitoring, should also occur in the event of evidences of carbon leakage.
Amendment 265 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42 a) Nowadays, the international dimension of the maritime sector is strategic. To achieve the results and the ambitions set in the present Regulation and an effective decrease in CO2 emissions throughout European and global maritime transport, a dedicated EU approach towards non-EU countries is urgently needed. This would serve to safeguard the competitiveness of the principal actors of the market and spread similar practices of the present Regulation also on a global scale. The effectiveness of the present Regulation would be strengthened if the EU were able to play a key role also at the international level.
Amendment 266 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
Recital 43 a (new)
(43 a) Equally important to achieve a zero-emission waterborne (transport) sector is the training of seafarers (operators) as well as of workers across European shipyards and maritime equipment companies. In both cases, the road to a zero-emission waterborne (transport) sector will require the need for upskilling/reskilling to enable these workers to get acquainted with, operate, install, repair and maintain new propulsion systems, zero-emission technologie sand sustainable fuels.
Amendment 273 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
in order to increase consistent use of renewable and low-carbon fuels and substitutalternative sources of energy across the Union, while ensuring the smooth operation of maritime traffic and avoiding distortions in the internal market, also coming from non-EU operators.
Amendment 278 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 336 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. From 1 January 2030, a ship at berth in a port of call under the jurisdiction of a Member State shall connect to on- shore power supply and use it for all energy needs while at berth, if these technologies are available and mature.
Amendment 372 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) biofuels and biogas that do not comply with point (a) or that are produced from food and feed crops shall be considered to have the same emission factors as the least favourable fossil fuel pathway for this type of fuelnot exceed the limitations set in Article 26 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 for the entire transport sector;
Amendment 414 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council, by 1 January 2030, or at any time in the event of evidences of carbon leakage, the results of an evaluation on the functioning of this Regulation and the evolution of the technologies and market for renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport and its impact on the maritime sector in the Union. The Commission shall consider possible amendments to:
Amendment 423 #
2021/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 a (new)
Article 28 a (new)
Article 28 a Periodic evaluation Every year over a period of five years as from the entry into force of the Fuel EU Maritime Regulation, the EU Commission shall evaluate the impact of Fuel EU Maritime on EU ports exposed to competition from non-EU ports. A list of those ports shall be established, their emissions monitored and the evolution of the volumes tracked to determine whether variations are due to market conditions or can be attributed to carbon leakage.
Amendment 56 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Over the past decades, air transport has played a crucial role in the Union's economy and in the everyday lives of Union citizens, as one of the best performing and most dynamic sectors of the Union economy. It has been a strong driver for economic growth, jobs, trade and tourism, as well as for connectivity and mobility for businesses and, citizens, students and workers alike, particularly within the Union aviation internal market. Growth in air transport services has significantly contributed to improving the internal market, the attractiveness of businesses to markets outside the Union, connectivity within the Union and with third countries, and has been a significant enabler of the Union economy. What is more, air transport is essential to maintaining the connectivity of the EU's insular and outermost regions, particularly where they are difficult or impossible to reach by other means of transport.
Amendment 59 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) In 2012, the Union set a target of producing two million tonnes of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) in Europe by 2020. However, 8 years later, production is heavily behind schedule. In this context, there is a need for a specific EU industrial policy, based on technology neutrality, for the development and use of SAF through funding, and for a secure legal framework.
Amendment 62 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) From 2020, air transport has been one of the hardest hit sector by the COVID-19 crisis. With the perspective of an end to the pandemic in sight, itparticularly its expected that air traffic willstage of causing shocks to consumption and mobility, a gradually resume in the coming years and recover to its pre-crisis levels. At the same timecovery of air traffic is about to begin and traffic will recover to its pre-crisis levels. At the same time, given the year-on-year increase in long-haul mobility, emissions from the sector have been increasing since 1990 and the trend of increasing emissions could return as we overcome the pandemic. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare for the future and make the necessary adjustments ensuring a well-functioning air transport market that contributes to achieving the Union’s climate goals, with high levels of connectivity, safety and securityhile ensuring that the sector remains competitive, including in global markets, and that jobs throughout the industry are preserved. What is more, to achieve the ambitions and goals set in the Green Deal, focus on demand-driven solutions will be vital, putting the passenger at the forefront and not abandoning the social impact of climate policies.
Amendment 66 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The functioning of the Union air transport sector is determined by its cross- border nature across the Union, and by its global dimension, which is why policies that support medium- and long-haul mobility must be adopted. The aviation internal market is one of the most integrated sectors in the Union, governed by uniform rules on market access and operating conditions. The air transport external policy is governed by rules established at global level at the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), as well as by comprehensive multilateral or bilateral agreements between the Union or its Member States, and third countries.
Amendment 67 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The air transport market is subject to strong competition between economic actors across the Union, for which a level playing field is indispensable, as is support for its recovery in the post-COVID period. The stability and prosperity of the air transport market and its economic actors relies on a clear and harmonised policy framework where aircraft operators, airports and other aviation actors can operate on the basis of equal opportunities and in a stable and predictable economic and industrial environment. Where market distortions occur, they risk putting aircraft operators or airports at a disadvantage with internal or external competitors. In turn, this can result in a loss of competitiveness of the air transport industry, and a loss of air connectivity for citizens and businesses. In view of the profound changes and innovations that SAF will entail for the entire civil aviation sector, the risk cannot be overlooked of competitive misalignment, which would be to the detriment of European carriers in comparison with carriers based in countries around the world where such approaches are not considered.
Amendment 71 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In particular, it is essential to ensure a level playing field across the Union air transport market regarding aviation fuel, which account for a substantial share of aircraft operators’ costs. Variations in fuel prices can affect significantly aircraft operators’ economic performance and negatively impact competition on the market and a clear impact on end consumers. Where differences in aviation fuel prices exist between Union airports or between Union and non-Union airports, this can lead aircraft operators to adapt their refuelling strategies for economic reasons. Fuel tankering increases aircraft’s fuel consumption and results in unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions. Fuel tankering by aircraft operators accordingly undermine, although performed as a form of defence against distorted market conditions and not with disregard for the environment, accordingly plays a part in the undermining of the results of the Union’s efforts towards environmental protection. Some aircraft operators are able to use favourable aviation fuel prices at their home base as a competitive advantage towards other airlines operating similar routes. This can have detrimental effects on the competitiveness of the sector and be harmful to air connectivity. This Regulation should set up measures to prevent such practices in order to avoid unnecessary environmental damage as well as to restore and preserve the conditions for fair competition on the air transport market, and to establish a legal and economic framework that provides enough certainty for the companies involved.
Amendment 73 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The establishment of a competitive single European market for aviation should remain a political priority for the Union. Ambitious climate targets pose a number of major challenges to air transport and SAF manufacturers: to achieve greater sustainability, we need to support initiatives and technological solutions that promote the investment capacities of the companies involved while preventing the imposition of excessive burdens.
Amendment 74 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) A key objective of the common transport policy is sustainable development. This requires an integrated approach aimed at ensuring both the effective functioning of Union transport systems and protection of the environment. Sustainable development of air transport requirescan benefit from the introduction of measures aimed at reducing the carbon emissions from aircraft flying from Union airports, acting so that the conditions required in global air traffic are aligned. Such measures should contribute to meeting the Union’s climate objectives by 2030 and 2050.
Amendment 77 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) To promote the introduction of SAF, climate policy choices need to be reviewed to ensure that national taxes, charges or bans do not prove ecologically and economically counterproductive. Imposing additional taxes and charges without reinvesting their proceeds in actual de-carbonisation projects does not help to truly reduce CO2 emissions, as all it does is hinder passenger connectivity and increase passenger costs. Additional charges, including taxes, if not geared towards supporting the technological change inherent in SAF, reduce the industry's ability to invest and innovate at a crucial time when research and development in low-carbon technologies should be supported. This regulation should therefore consider incentives for the production and deployment of innovative fuels rather than simply new and additional forms of taxation.
Amendment 79 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The Communication on a Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy10 adopted by the Commission in December 2020 sets a course of action for the EU transport system to achieve its green and digital transformation and become more resilient. The decarbonisation of the air transport sector is a necessary and challenging process, especially in the short and medium term. Technological advancements, pursued in European and national research and innovation aviation programmes have contributed to importbeen helping to significantly reduce resource efficiency antd emission reductions in the pasrecent decades. However, the global growth of air traffic has outpaced the sector’s emissions reductions. Whereas new technologies are expected to help reducing short-haul aviation’s reliance on fossil energy in the next decades, sustainable aviation fuels offer the onlya solution for significant decarbonisation of all flight ranges, already in the short term. However, this potential is currently largely untapped. _________________ 10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future (COM/2020/789 final), 9.12.2020As the impact study points out, increasing SAF production today implies high-risk investments with considerable uncertainty for producers and investors.
Amendment 83 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Sustainable aviation fuels are liquid, drop-in fuels, fully fungible with conventional aviation fuel and compatible with existing aircraft engines. Several production pathways of sustainable aviation fuels have been certified at global level for use in civil or military aviation. Sustainable aviation fuels are technologically ready to play an important role in reducing emissions from air transport already in the very short term, without focus on research and development in the sector being lost, howeverm. They are expected to account for a major part of the aviation fuel mix in the medium and long term if properly supported and fostered. Further, with the support of appropriate international fuel standards, sustainable aviation fuels might contribute to lowering the aromatic content of the final fuel used by an operator, thus helping to reduce other non-CO2 emissions. Other alternatives to power aircraft, such as electricity or liquid hydrogen are expected to progressively contribute to the decarbonisation of air transport, beginning with short-haul flights. As the impact study points out, however, it would take decades of work on the development of zero-emission aircraft technologies, such as electric or hydrogen-powered aircraft, before they could play a major role in commercial aviation.
Amendment 88 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The gradual introduction of sustainable aviation fuels on the air transport market will represent an additional fuel cost for airlines, as such fuel technologies are currently more expensive to produce than conventional aviation fuel. This is expected to exacerbate the pre-existing issues of level playing field on the air transport market as regards aviation fuel, and to cause further distortions among aircraft operators and airports. This regulation should take measures to prevent that the introduction of sustainable aviation fuels affects negatively the competitiveness of the aviation sector by defining harmonised requirements across the Union and always take a global approach that makes it possible to have conditions that are not excessively out of line with those of the EU's external competitors.
Amendment 89 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) At global level, sustainable aviation fuels are regulated at ICAO. In particular, ICAO establishes detailed requirements on the sustainability, traceability and accounting of sustainable aviation fuels for use on flights covered by the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). While incentives are set in CORSIA and sustainable aviation fuels are considered an integral pillar of the work on the feasibility of a Long-Term Aspiration Goal for international aviation, there is currently no mandatory scheme on the use of sustainable aviation fuels for international flights. Comprehensive multilateral or bilateral air transport agreements between the EU or its Member States, and third countries generally include provisions on environmental protection. However, for the time being, such provisions do not impose on contracting parties any binding requirements on the use of sustainable aviation fuels. If this ambiguity is to be resolved, care must be taken not to place an undue and sudden burden on internal EU players in the sector so that they are not hamstrung by tough global competition.
Amendment 95 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) At EU level, general rules on renewable energy for the transport sector are set out in Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council11. In the past, given the specific nature of and tough global competition in the sector, such horizontal cross-sectoral regulatory frameworks have not proven effective to operate a transition from fossil fuels to sustainable aviation fuel in air transport. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 and its predecessor set out overarching targets across all transport modes to be supplied with renewable fuels. As aviation is a small fuels market for which renewable fuels are more costly to produce while a fully integrated European transport market, in comparison to other transport modes, such regulatory frameworks should be complemented with aviation-specific measures to effectively boostencourage the deployment of sustainable aviation fuels. Further, national transpositions of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 risks creating significant fragmentation in the air transport market, where national rules on sustainable aviation fuels would set out widely differing targets. This would be expected to further exacerbate the issues of level playing field in air transport. _________________ 11 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82).
Amendment 97 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Therefore, uniform rules need to be laid down for the aviation internal market to complement Directive (EU) 2018/2001 and to deliver on its overall objectives by addressing the specific needs and requirements arising from the EU aviation internal market. In particular, the present Regulation aims to obtain the conditions that make it possible to have a healthy and profitable market for EU operators, avoiding a fragmentation of the aviation market, preventing possible competitive distortions between economic actors, or unfair practices of cost avoidance as regards the refuelling of aircraft operators.
Amendment 99 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) This regulation aims in the first instance to set out a framework restoring and preserving a level playing field on the air transport market as regards the use of aviation fuels. Such a framework should prevent divergent requirements across the Union that would exacerbate refuelling practices distorting competition between aircraft operators or putting some airports at competitive disadvantage with others. In a second instance, it aims to gear the EU aviation market with robust rules to ensure that gradually increasing shares of sustainable aviation fuels can be introduced at EU airports without detrimental effects on the competitiveness of the EU aviation internal market. What is more, the regulation should aim to stimulate the SAF production chain and SMEs and provide legal and economic certainty to a key sector for future decarbonisation.
Amendment 100 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) It is essential to set harmonised rules across the EU internal market, applying directly and in a uniform way to aviation market actors on the one hand, and aviation fuels market actors on the other hand. The overarching framework set out by Directive (EU) 2018/2001 should be complemented with a lex specialis applying to air transport. It should include gradually increasing targets for the supply of sustainable aviation fuels. Such targets should be carefully defined, taking into account the objectives of a well- functioning air transport market, operators being supported in their recovery from the pandemic, a service that puts its passengers at the forefront, the need to decarbonise the aviation sector and the current status of the sustainable aviation fuels industry.
Amendment 103 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The present Regulation should apply to aircraft engaged in civil aviation, carrying out commercial air transport flights under market conditions that are considered efficient and not in emergency global or regional situations. It should not apply to aircraft such as military aircraft and aircraft engaged in operations for humanitarian, search, rescue, disaster relief or medical purposes, as well as customs, police and fire-fighting operations. Indeed, flights operated in such circumstances are of exceptional nature and as such cannot always be planned in the same way as regular flights. Due to the nature of their operations, they may not always be in a position to fulfil obligations under this Regulation, as it may represent unnecessary burden. In order to cater for a level playing field across the EU aviation single market, this regulation, with due regard for the above-mentioned conditions, should cover the largest possible share of commercial air traffic operated from airports located on EU territory. At the same time, in order to safeguard air connectivity for the benefits of EU citizens, businesses and regions, it is important to avoid imposing undue burden on air transport operations at small airports. An appropriate threshold of yearly passenger air traffic and freight traffic should be defined, below which airports would not be covered by this Regulation; however, the scope of the Regulation should cover at least 95% of total traffic departing from airports in the Union. For the same reasons, possible following an impact analysis of the values identified. For the same reasons and taking the same analytical approach, a threshold should be defined to exempt aircraft operators accountable for a very low number of departures from airports located on EU territory.
Amendment 108 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) DResearch, development and deployment of sustainable aviation fuels with a high potential for sustainability, commercial maturity and a high potential for innovation and growth to meet future needs should be promotencouraged. This should support creating innovative and competitive fuels markets and ensure sufficient supply of sustainable aviation fuels for aviation in shortthe medium and long term to contribute to Union transport decarbonisation ambitions and to the competitiveness of Union companies in the sector, while strengthening Union’s efforts towards a high level of environmental protection. For this purpose, sustainable aviation fuels produced from feedstock listed in Parts A and B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, as well as synthetic aviation fuels should be eligible. In particular, sustainable aviation fuels produced from feedstock listed in Part B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 are essential, as currently the most commercially mature technology to decarbonise air transport already in the short term.
Amendment 112 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) For sustainability reasons, if confirmed in more in-depth impact analyses, feed and food crop-based fuels should not be eligible. In particular, indirect land-use change occurs when the cultivation of crops for biofuels displaces traditional production of crops for food and feed purposes. Such additional demand increases the pressure on land and can lead to the extension of agricultural land into areas with high-carbon stock, such as forests, wetlands and peatland, causing additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity concerns. Research hais showning that the scale of the effect depends on a variety of factors, including the type of feedstock used for fuel production, the level of additional demand for feedstock triggered by the use of biofuels and the extent to which land with high-carbon stock is protected worldwide. The highest risks of indirect land-use change have been identified for biofuels, fuels produced from feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high- carbon stock is observed. Accordingly, feed and food crop- based fuels should not be promoted as a priority. This approach is in line Union policy and in particular with Directive (EU) 2018/2001 which limits and sets a cap on the use of such biofuels in road and rail transport, considering their lower environmental benefits, lower performance in terms of greenhouse reduction potential and broader sustainability concerns. In addition to the greenhouse gas emissions linked to indirect land-use change – which is capable of negating some or all greenhouse gas emissions savings of individual biofuels – indirect land-use change poses risks also to biodiversity. This risk iscould be particularly serious in connection with a potentially large expansion of production determined by a significant increase in demand. TIn the aviation sector has currently insignificant levels of demand for food and feed crops- based biofuels, since over 99% of currently used aviation fuels are of fossil origin. It is therefore appropriate to avoid the creation of a potentially large, the subject is not a top priority because it has currently insignificant levels of demand ofor food and feed crops-based biofuels by promoting their use under this Regulation. The non- eligibility of crop-based biofuels under this Regulation also minimises any risk to slow down the decarbonisation of road transport, which could otherwise result from a shift of crop-based biofuels from the road to the aviation sector. It is essential to minimise such a shift, as road transport currently remains by far the most polluting transport sector, since over 99% of currently used aviation fuels are of fossil origin.
Amendment 113 #
2021/0205(COD)
(18) A single, clear and robust, robust and lasting sustainability framework is necessary to provide certainty for the aviation and fuels industries actors, on the eligibility of sustainable aviation fuels under this Regulation. To ensure consistency with other related EU policies, the eligibility of sustainable aviation fuels should be determined according to compliance with the sustainability criteria established in Article 29 of Directive 2018/200112. _________________ 12https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018 L2001&from=fr
Amendment 118 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The present Regulation should aim to ensure that aircraft operators can compete on the basis of equal opportunities as regards the access to sustainable aviation fuels. To avoid any distortions on the air services market, all Union airports covered by this Regulation should be supplied with uniform minimum shares of sustainable aviation fuels. Whereas the market is free to supply and use larger quantities of sustainable fuel, this Regulation should ensure that the mandatory minimum shares of sustainable aviation fuels are the same across allcan be proportional to the covered airports' volume of traffic. It supersedes any requirements established directly or indirectly at national or regional level requiring aircraft operators or aviation fuel suppliers to uptake or supply sustainable aviation fuels with different targets than the ones prescribed under this Regulation. In order to create a clear and predictable legal framework and in doing so encourage the market development and deployment of the most sustainable and innovative with growth potential to meet future needs fuel technologies, this Regulation should set out gradually increasing minimum shares of synthetic aviation fuels over time. Setting out a dedicated sub-obligation on synthetic aviation fuels is necessary in view of the significant decarbonisation potential of such fuels, and in view of their current estimated production costs. When produced from renewable electricity and carbon captured directly from the air, synthetic aviation fuels can achieve as high as 100% emissions savings compared to conventional aviation fuel. They also have notable advantages compared to other types of sustainable aviation fuels with regards to resource efficiency (in particular for water needs) of the production process. However, synthetic aviation fuels’ production costs are currently estimated at 3 to 6 times higher than the market price of conventional aviation fuel. Therefore, this Regulation should establish a dedicated sub-obligation for this technology and specific incentives to provide economies of scale and relative restriction of costs. Other types of synthetic fuels, such as low carbon synthetic fuels achieving high greenhouse gas reductions, could be considered for inclusion in the scope of this Regulation in the course of future revisions, where such fuels become defined under the Renewable Energy Directive.
Amendment 120 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) It is essential to ensure that the minimum shares of sustainable aviation fuels can be successfully supplied to the aviation market without supply shortages. For this purpose, sufficient lead-time should be planned to allow the renewable fuels industry to develop production capacity, economic sustainability and mature market development accordingly. The supply of sustainable aviation fuels should become mandatory starting in 2025in the coming years, depending on the maturity and accessibility of the technology. Similarly, in order to provide legal certainty and predictability to the market and drive investments durably towards sustainable aviation fuels production capacity, the terms of this Regulation should be stable over a long period of time.
Amendment 123 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) With the introduction and ramp-up of sustainable aviation fuels at Union airports, practices of fuel tankering may be exacerbated as a consequence of aviation fuel costs increases. Tankering practices are unstainable and should be avoided as they undermine the Union’s efforts to reduce environmental impacts from transport. Tanking practices should be discouraged not only through the imposition of additional obligations and burden but also by introducing policies that make them economically unattractive to operators. Those would be contrary to the aviation decarbonisation objectives as increased aircraft weight would increase fuel consumption and related emissions on a given flight. Tankering practices also put at risk the level playing field in the Union between aircraft operators, and also between airports. This Regulation should therefore require aircraft operators to refuel prior to departure from a given Union airport. The amount of fuel uplifted prior to departures from a given Union airport should be commensurate with the amount of fuel necessary to operate the flights departing from that airport, taking into account the necessary compliance with fuel safety rules. The requirement ensures that equal conditions for operations in the Union applying equally to Union and foreign operators, while ensuring high level of environmental protection. As the Regulation does not define a maximum share of sustainable aviation fuels in all aviation fuels, airlines and fuel suppliers may pursue more ambitious environmental policies with higher sustainable aviation fuels uptake and supply in their overall network of operations, while avoiding fuel tankering.
Amendment 124 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Airports covered by this Regulation should ensure that all the necessary infrastructure is provided for delivery, storage and refuelling of sustainable aviation fuel, so as not to constitute an obstacle with respect to the uptake of such sustainable aviation fuel but instead foster economies of scale. Structural investment costs must be paid by the operators who actually use the structure. If necessary, the Agency should be able to require a Union airport to provide information on the infrastructure available allowing for seamless distribution and refuelling of aircraft operators with sustainable aviation fuels. The role of the Agency should allow airports and airlines to have a common focal point, in the event where technical clarification is necessary on the availability of fuel infrastructure.
Amendment 127 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Aircraft operators should be required to report yearly to the Agency on their purchases of sustainable aviation fuel, as well as on the characteristics of this fuel. Information should be provided on the characteristics of the sustainable aviation fuels purchased such as inter alia nature and origin of the feedstock, conversion pathway and lifecycle emissions. Before proceeding with this step, the operators themselves should be involved in a process of designing the reporting needed to achieve the intended goal.
Amendment 128 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Aircraft operators should also be required to report yearly on their actual aviation fuel uplift per Union airport, so as to prove that no fuel tankering was performed. Reports should be verified by independent verifiers and transmitted to the Agency for monitoring and assessment of compliance. Verifiers should determine the accuracy of the yearly aviation fuel required reported by the operators using a tool approved by the Commission. It seems important for the proper functioning of the market and the competitiveness of EU operators to consider the efficiency of the process, by means of a thorough preliminary study, so that it does not overly burden operations in a sector with such strong global competition and at a very difficult time.
Amendment 129 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Aviation fuel suppliers should be required to report yearly, in keeping with a time line that makes it possible for companies to set long-term strategies, in the Union database referred to in Article 28 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, on their supply of aviation fuel, including sustainable aviation fuels. The Agency should report on a yearly basis to the Commission on the fulfilment by aircraft operators and aviation fuel suppliers of their respective obligations under this Regulation. This is important for the Commission to have clear visibility on the level of compliance to the Regulation and to measure with increased objectivity the extent to which the Regulation is working.
Amendment 130 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) It is not possible without additional procedures, which would be excessively burdensome and undermine the competitiveness of operators at a very difficult time, to determine accurately whether aircraft operators have actually physically uplifted shares of sustainable aviation fuels in their tanks at a specific Union airports. Therefore, aircraft operators should be allowed to report their use of sustainable aviation fuels based on purchasing records. Aircraft operators should be entitled to receive from the aviation fuel supplier the information that is necessary to report the sustainable aviation fuel purchase.
Amendment 133 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) It is essentialimportant that aircraft operators can claim the use of sustainable aviation fuels under greenhouse gas schemes such as the EU Emissions Trading System or CORSIA, depending on the route of their flights. However, iIt is essential to remember that this regulation should not lead to a double counting of emissions reductions. Aircraft operators should only be allowed to claim benefits for the use of an identical batch of sustainable aviation fuels once. Fuel suppliers should be requested to provide free of charge to aircraft operators any information pertaining to the properties of the sustainable aviation fuel sold to that aircraft operator and that is relevant for reporting purposes by the aircraft operator under this Regulation or greenhouse gas schemes.
Amendment 136 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) In order to ensure a level playing field of the aviation internal market and the adherence to the climate ambitions of the Union, this Regulation should introduce effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on aviation fuel suppliers and aircraft operators in case of non- compliance. The level of the penalties needs to be proportionate to the environmental damage and to the prejudice to the level-playing field of the internal market inflicted by the non-compliance. When imposing administrative fines, the authorities should take into account the evolution of the price of aviation fuel and sustainable aviation fuel in the reporting year, bearing in mind that in the first period of application of the Regulation, there will have to be as much clarity as possible on the rules introduced and it is conceivable that some doubt may arise as to how to apply a less than straightforward set of new rules perfectly;
Amendment 141 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The penalties for the suppliers who fail to meet the targets set in this Regulation should be complemented by the obligation to supply the market with a significant percentage of the shortfall of meeting the quota in the subsequent year;
Amendment 142 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) This Regulation should include provisions for periodic reports to the European Parliament and the Council on the evolution of the aviation and fuels markets, the effectiveness of key features of the Regulation such as the minimum shares of sustainable aviation fuels, any proposed incentives and their effectiveness, the level of administrative fines or policy developments on sustainable aviation fuels uptake at international level. Such elements are key to provide a clear state of play of the sustainable aviation fuels market and should be taken into account when considering a revision of the Regulation.
Amendment 144 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) An appropriate transitional period of 5at least 10 years should be provided to allow for a reasonable amount of time for aviation fuel suppliers, Union airports and aircraft operators to make the necessary technological and logistical investments. During this phase, aviation fuel containing higher shares of sustainable aviation fuel may be used to compensate for lower shares of sustainable aviation fuels or for the reduced availability of conventional aviation fuel at other airports.
Amendment 145 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to maintain a level playing field on the Union air transport market while increasing the use of sustainable aviation fuels, and contributing to the pursuit of competitiveness for Union operators in the sector's global setting, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States due to the cross-border nature of aviation, but can rather, by reason of the characteristics of the market and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Amendment 147 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) The international dimension of aviation is strategically important now. To achieve the results and ambitions of this Regulation and a real reduction in emissions from European and global aviation, action by the European Union vis-à-vis non-European countries is necessary. The action is needed to protect the competitiveness of the main market players based in the Member States and at the same time to disseminate practices similar to those included in this Regulation on a global scale. This Regulation will be all the more effective if the Union manages to be a reference in the sector at international level.
Amendment 165 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
— ‘synthetic aviation fuels’ means fuels that are renewable fuels of non- biological origin and recycled fossil fuels, as defined in Article 2, second paragraph, point 35 and 36 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, used in aviation either as final fuels or as intermediate products for the manufacture of aviation fuels (Article 25(1)(b) of that Directive);
Amendment 180 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to the application of Article 11(3) and (4), where an aviation fuel supplier fails to supply the minimum shares set out in Annex I for a given reporting period, it shall at least complement a significant share of that shortfall in the subsequent reporting period.
Amendment 186 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
The yearly quantity of aviation fuel uplifted by a given aircraft operator at a given Union airport shall be at least 90% of the yearly aviation fuel required. The mandatory minimum sustainable aviation fuel quotas must be proportional to the volume of traffic at the airports concerned.
Amendment 193 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Union airports shall take necessary measures to facilitate the access of aircraft operators to aviation fuels containing shares of sustainable aviation fuels in accordance with Annex I and, shall provide the infrastructure necessary for the delivery, storage and uplifting of such fuels in line with the principle of technology neutrality. These infrastructure adaptations should have no economic impact other than for operators using those fuels.
Amendment 202 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
By 31 March0 June of each reporting year, aircraft operators shall report the following information to the Agency:
Amendment 203 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) The yearly non-tanked quantity, per Union airport and destination in the EU. If the yearly non-tanked quantity is negative or if it is lower than 10% of the yearly aviation fuel required, the reported yearly non-tanked quantity shall be reported as 0;
Amendment 207 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
For the purpose of reporting sustainable aviation fuels use under the provisions of Article 7 of this Regulation, or under a greenhouse gas scheme, aviation fuel suppliers shall provide aircraft operators with the information considered relevant information free of charg the specific scope free of charge and in a reasonable time frame.
Amendment 210 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
By 31 March0 June of each reporting year, aviation fuel suppliers shall report in the Union Database referred to in Article 28 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, the following information relative to the reporting period:
Amendment 213 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
The Agency shall have access to the Union database and shall use the information contained in the Union database, only once the information has been verified at Member State level pursuant to Article 28 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 and the Member State has given formal authorisation.
Amendment 215 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
(1) Member States shall designate the competent authority or authorities responsible for enforcing the application of this Regulation and for imposing the fines for aircraft operators, Union airports and fuel suppliers. Member States shall inform the Commission thereof. Those authorities should be the same as those that assess the ETS and CORSIA.
Amendment 220 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
(1) Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions adopted pursuant to this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and must take account of an initial learning period. Member States shall notify these provisions to the Commission by 31 December 2023 at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Amendment 238 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Agency shall publish every year a technical report on the basis of the yearly reports referred to in Articles 7 and 9. That report shall contain at least four points from the following information:
Amendment 244 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
By way of derogation from Article 4, from 1 January 20235 until 31 December 20239, for each reporting period, an aviation fuel supplier may supply the minimum share of sustainable aviation fuel defined in Annex I as a weighted average over all the aviation fuel it supplied across Union airports for that reporting period.
Amendment 252 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
By 1 January 202830 and every five years thereafter, the Commission services shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, on the evolution of the aviation fuels market and its impact on the aviation internal market of the Union, including regarding the possible extension of the scope of this Regulation to other energy sources, and other types of synthetic fuels defined under the Renewable Energy Directive, the possible revision of the minimum shares in Article 4 and Annex I, and the level of administrative fines. The report shall include information, where available, on development of a potential policy framework for uptake of sustainable aviation fuels at ICAO level. The report shall also inform on technological advancements in the area of research and innovation in the aviation industry which are relevant to sustainable aviation fuels, including with regards to the reduction of non-CO2 emissions. The report may consider if this Regulation should be amended and, options for amendments, where appropriate, in line with a potential policy framework on sustainable aviation fuels uptake at ICAO level.
Amendment 258 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from 1st January 20233.
Amendment 259 #
2021/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
However, Article 4 and 5 shall apply from 1 January 20235 and Articles 7 and Article 9 shall apply from 1st April 20234 for the reporting period of the year 20233.
Amendment 57 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) This Regulation should also take into account the significant industrial and social consequences and ensure employment and accessible mobility for all.
Amendment 63 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to achieve a reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions of at least 545 % by 2030 compared to 1990, it is necessary to strengtheimportant to focus on the reduction requirements set out in Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 for both passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. A clear pathway also needs to be set for further reductions beyond 2030 to contribute to achieving the climate neutrality objective by 2050. Without ambitious action on greenhouse gas emission reductions in road transport, higher emission reductions would be needed in other sectors, including sectors where decarbonisation is more challengingHowever, taking into account the economic and social importance of road transport, those measures will need to ensure that the competitiveness of the industry is maintained and that the transition is performed in a socially acceptable manner. __________________ 25Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 443/2009 and (EU) No 510/2011 (OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 13).
Amendment 65 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The strengthened CO2 emission reduction requirements should incentivise an increasing share of zero-emission and low-emission vehicles being deployed on the Union market whilst providing benefits to consumers and citizens in terms of air quality and energy savings, as well as ensuring that innovation in the automotive value chain can be maintained. The automotive industry remains one of the pillars of the Union economy, contributing 7% of European GDP, providing 4.6 million jobs and remaining at the cutting edge of technological innovation with EUR 60 billion invested each year in research and development. The industry needs to be supported in its environmental and digital transition, as European manufacturers are now facing a triple bind, with tightened environmental regulations, increasing investment needs in innovation and heightened international competition. Within the global context, also the EU automotive chain must continue to be a leading actor in the on- going transition towards zero-emission mobility. The strengthened CO2 emission reduction standards aremust remain technology neutral in reaching the fleet-wide targets that they set. Different technologies are andmust remain available to reach the zero-emission fleet wide target. Zero-emission vehicles currently include battery electric vehicles, fuel-cell and other hydrogen powered vehicles, and technological innovations are continuing. Zero and low-emission vehicles, which also include well performing plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, can continue to play a role in the transition pathway which run on advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/20011a, which is currently under review, can continue to play a role in the transition pathway. __________________ 1aDirective (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82).
Amendment 75 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) While battery-powered electric vehicles have great potential to decarbonise the fleet and should be encouraged, they do not justify abandoning the principle of technological neutrality, and should rather be used together with other efficient technologies. It is important to stress that no technology is ‘zero emission’ or has no environmental impact, including this type of vehicle (given the battery’s carbon footprint, the higher weight of vehicles, the origin of the electricity, the extraction of raw materials). In this respect, the risk of supply tensions should be assessed and addressed in order to meet European demand in a context of increased international pressure to extract the resources needed to manufacture batteries, with projections for battery production increasing twentyfold by 2050. Moreover, the impacts on electricity networks (in terms of decarbonisation, availability, performance and standardisation) or on the rollout of recharging infrastructures (network size correlated with autonomy, high private and public investment requirements) must be considered.
Amendment 83 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 b (new)
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) The principle of technological neutrality is fundamental to ensure there is a plurality of solutions, to preserve innovation and development, including in disruptive technologies, and to allow market flexibility and a diverse range of social behaviours. It is thus important not to limit road transport to a single technology but rather encourage innovation and complementarities between efficient alternative technologies, such as the combined use of hybrid vehicles and low-carbon fuels. Furthermore, a ‘one size fits all’ approach at European level would be compromised by the wide economic, social, geographical and infrastructural diversity within and between Member States, whereas a mix of complementary technologies allows each region to implement the solutions it deems most appropriate to reduce its emissions.
Amendment 90 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Against that background, new strengthened CO2 emission reduction targets should be set for both new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for the period 2030 onwards. Those targets should be set at a level that willrespects the principle of technological neutrality while delivering a strong signal to accelerate the uptake of zero-emission and low-emission vehicles on the Union market and to stimulate innovation in zero- emission technologies in a cost- efficient way.
Amendment 103 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The targets in the revised CO2 performance standards should be accompanied by a European strategy to address the challenges posed by the scale- up of the manufacturing of zero-emission and low-emission vehicles and associated technologies, as well as the need for up- and re-skilling of workers in the sector and the economic diversification and reconversion of activities. Where appropriate, fFinancial support should be consideredtherefore be stepped up at the level of the EU and Member States to crowd in private investment, including via the European Social Fund Plus, the Just Transition Fund, the Innovation Fund, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the Automotive Sector Support Fund and other instruments of the Multiannual Financial Framework and the Next Generation EU, in line with State aid rules. The revised environmental and energy state aid rules will enable Member States to support business to decarbonize their production processes and adopt greener technologies in the context of the New Industrial Strategy.
Amendment 105 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) A structural effect of the transition to zero-emission vehicles will be significant job losses in the automotive sector, from manufacturers and their suppliers to ancillary maintenance and repair services. In order to manage the social consequences of the transition, a specific fund to support the sector should be established to help with the requalification, training and retraining of automotive workers, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises in the sector. This fund should be financed by the general budget of the Union and from income from excess emissions premiums.
Amendment 107 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 b (new)
Recital 11 b (new)
(11b) It will not be possible to achieve the long-term goal of entirely decarbonising European mobility without technological innovation and technical progress. With that in mind, and in the face of increased international competition, it is essential that the Union and Member States continue their efforts to explore and develop initiatives that promote the synergies possible in the sector, taking as a model the EU Batteries Alliance, and support public and private investment in European automotive research and innovation in order to maintain European technological leadership in that sector, to develop industrial excellence in the technologies of the future on European soil and to ensure the long-term sustainability of its industrial base, keeping it efficient and competitive on the world market.
Amendment 112 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The updated New Industrial Strategy26 foresees the co-creation of green and digital transition pathways in partnership with industry, public authorities, social partners and other stakeholders. In this context, a transition pathway should be developed for the mobility ecosystem to accompany the transition of the automotive value chain. The pathway should take particular heed of SMEs in the automotive supply chain, of the consultation of social partners including by Member States, and also build on the European Skills Agenda with initiatives like the Pact for Skills to mobilise the private sector and other stakeholders to up-skill and re-skill Europe’s workforce in view of the green and digital transitions. The appropriate actions and incentives at European and national level to boost the affordability of zero emission vehicles should also be addressed in the pathway. The progress made on this comprehensive transition pathway for the mobility ecosystem should be monitored every two years as part of a progress report to be submitted by the Commission, looking inter alia at the progress in the deployment of zero- emission and low-emission vehicles, their price developments, deployment of alternative fuels development and infrastructure roll- out as required under the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation, the potential of innovative technologies to reach climate neutral mobility, international competitiveness, investments in the automotive value chain, up-skilling and re- skilling of workers and reconversion of activities. The progress report will also build on the two-year progress reports that Member States submit under the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation. The Commission should consult social partners in the preparation of the progress report, including the results in the social dialogue. Innovations in the automotive supply chain are continuing. Innovative technologies such as the production of advanced biofuels and electro-fuels with air capture, if further developed, could offer prospects for affordable climate neutral mobility. The Commission should therefore keep track of progress in the state of innovation in the sector as part of its progress report. __________________ 26 Commission Communication - Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery, COM(2021) 350 final of 5 May 2021
Amendment 119 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) In order to ensure the future viability of the European manufacturing industry and to strengthen the Union's strategic autonomy, it is essential that the Commission works together with Member States and industrial stakeholders to secure the supply chain in the strategic materials and rare earths needed for new low-carbon technologies.
Amendment 120 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 b (new)
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) Although this Regulation only applies to new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles on the market, it is important to include in it a more comprehensive Union-wide action plan to decarbonise the existing fleet. The current fleet will remain a factor that contributes towards environmental underperformance for an extended period into the future owing to the slow pace of fleet renewal. To speed up the reduction of emissions from the existing fleet, it is of the utmost importance that the Commission submits legislative proposals without delay to establish a framework that is favourable to retrofitting and encourages the use of low-carbon fuels, to accelerate the modal shift for freight and passengers and to encourage more environmentally friendly transport habits (carpooling, soft mobility and public transport in cities, etc.).
Amendment 127 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) The rollout of sufficient charging and refuelling infrastructure for alternative fuels is an essential prerequisite for the development of the market for zero- and low-emission vehicles and, therefore, for the success of this Regulation; thus, any increase in this Regulation’s emission-reduction targets, including on interim objectives, should go hand-in-hand with an increase in rollout targets set as part of the revision of the Directive on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure; in this connection, it is vital that investment in its deployment should be continued and increased. The Member States should be provided with sufficient support and help to achieve this objective due to their significant investment needs in a decade in which their tax losses and transfers of tax revenues towards alternative fuels will increase. In this context, it is important to underline that the issue of refuelling is intrinsically linked to the very autonomy of vehicles, that, the more the latter increases, the less frequent refuelling will need to be – and that the Commission should therefore take account of technological developments, in particular with regard to the autonomy of batteries, which affect the deployment of infrastructure.
Amendment 150 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 161 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The progress made under Regulation (EU) 2019/631 towards achieving the reduction objectives set for 2030 and beyond should be reviewed in 20267. For this review, all aspects considered in the two yearly reporting should be considered.
Amendment 166 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
Amendment 194 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
(i) in point (a), the figure “37,5 %” is replaced by ‘5540 %’,
Amendment 202 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) in point (b), the figure “31 %” is replaced by ‘540 %’,
Amendment 208 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – – introductory part
5a. From 1 January 203540, the following EU fleet-wide targets shall apply:
Amendment 213 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 1070 % reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with Part A, point 6.1.32, of Annex I, to maintain a balanced proportion of low- emission passenger cars on the market;
Amendment 220 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 1070 % reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with Part B, point 6.1.3, of Annex I.
Amendment 222 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 5a – point b
(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 100 % reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with Part B, point 6.1.3,2 of Annex I.
Amendment 237 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(ba) the following point is added: ‘(na) sustainable and/or advanced renewable fuel’ means fuels that meet the sustainability requirements set out in Directive (EU) 2018/2001.’
Amendment 239 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(ba) the following point is added: ‘(na) ‘plug-in hybrid electric vehicle’ (PHEV): a vehicle powered by a combination of an electric motor with a rechargeable battery and an internal combustion engine, which may operate together or separately.’
Amendment 255 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a
(i) in point (a), the figure “37,5 %” is replaced by ‘545 %’,
Amendment 256 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 7 – paragraph 10
Article 7 – paragraph 10
Amendment 266 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point ii
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b
(ii) in point (b), the figure “31 %” is replaced by ‘540 %’,
Amendment 267 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 277 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(6a) In Article 12, the following paragraph is inserted: ‘3a. The Commission shall draw up, no later than 31 December 2023, a common Union methodology for the assessment and the consistent data reporting of the full life-cycle CO2 emissions of fuels and energy consumed by vehicles on the Union market.’
Amendment 280 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a (new) – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a (new) – point a
(a) for the average emissions of the new passenger carlight commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 100 % 70% reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with Part AB, point 6.1.32, of Annex I;.
Amendment 284 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 14 a – paragraph 1
Article 14 a – paragraph 1
By 31 December 2025, and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall report on the progress towards zero emission road mobilityclimate neutrality road mobility. The report shall assess and as certain whether this regulation needs to be modified to take a more holistic and comprehensive approach to emissions, on the basis of the methodologies set out in Articles 7(10) and 12(3a). The report shall in particular monitor and assess the need for possible additional measures to facilitate the transition, including through financial means.
Amendment 284 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a a (new)
5aa. From 1 January 2040, the following EU fleet-targets shall apply: (a) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 100% reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with Part B, point 6.1.2, of Annex I.’,
Amendment 289 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 14 a – paragraph 2
Article 14 a – paragraph 2
In the reporting, the Commission shall consider all factors that contribute to a cost-efficient progress towards climate neutrality by 2050. ThisFactors shall includes the deploymenfollowing: (a) the cost of zero- and low-emission vehicles, progress in achieving the targets for the roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure (b) consumer take-up of zero- and low-emission vehicles (c) the specific characteristics of light commercial vehicles (d) progress in achieving a sufficient roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure including, but not limited to, progress in achieving the targets as required under the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation, and the Energy Performance of Building Directive, (e) the potential contribution of innovation technologies and sustainable alternative fuels, including synthetic fuels, to reach climate neutral mobility, impact on consumers, progress in social dialogue as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition towards zero emission road mobility. (f) the functioning of the incentive mechanism for zero- and low-emission vehicles, (g) impact on consumers, particularly those on low and medium incomes, (h) progress in social dialogue as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition, taking into account employment and competitiveness, towards affordable climate neutral road mobility. For each of the factors listed above, the Commission shall issue an assessment of its effectiveness, taking into account expected progress, in enabling the 2030 and 2035 fleet average CO2 targets to be met.
Amendment 303 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, in 20287, review the effectiveness and impact of this Regulation, building on the two yearly reporting, and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council with the result of the review.
Amendment 310 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amending this Regulation. by introducing EU fleet-wide targets for passenger cars from 1 January 2035 and from 1 January 2040 as appropriate.’
Amendment 313 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Amendment 315 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraphs 2 to 5
Article 15 – paragraphs 2 to 5
(b) paragraphs 23 to 5 are deleted,
Amendment 318 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1
Annex I – part A – point 6.1
Amendment 318 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the following point is inserted: ‘(ba) sustainable and/or advanced renewable fuel’ means fuels that meet the sustainability requirements set out in Directive (EU) 2018/2001.’;
Amendment 319 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1
Annex I – part A – point 6.1
Amendment 328 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.2
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.2
Amendment 331 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Amendment 332 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 338 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 339 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 343 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 - point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 - point a a (new)
(aa) the following paragraph is inserted: ‘6aa. Upon application by a manufacturer, CO2 savings deriving from the use of sustainable and/or advanced renewable fuels shall be considered. 2. The total contribution of those savings may be up to [xx] g CO2/km. 3. Within three months from the notification under Article 7(4), the manufacturer shall notify to the Commission: (a) the amount and the type of sustainable and/or advanced renewable fuel provided by a fuel supplier in a specific Member State and related to the average lifetime fuel consumption of the vehicles; (b) that the amount referred to in point (a) is additional to the obligations set by Directive (EU) 2018/2001 for the fuel supplier in the specific Member State; (c) the CO2 savings resulting from the supply of the amount of fuel in point (a) calculated following the procedures laid down in Directive (EU) 2018/2001. (d) that the vehicles referred to in point (a) are technically compatible with the use of the type of sustainable and/or advanced renewable fuel in accordance with Regulation (EC) 715/2007; (e)that the information referred to in points (a) to (d) have also been notified to the competent authority in the specific Member State according to Article 7(6).’
Amendment 359 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Amendment 360 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 363 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.3.2
Annex I – part A – point 6.3.2
6.3.2 Specific emissions targets for 2030 to 2034
Amendment 367 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part A – point 6.3.3
Annex I – part A – point 6.3.3
Amendment 390 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c – introductory part
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3
(c) the following points 6.1.3 isand 6.1.3a are added:
Amendment 392 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3
6.1.3. The EU fleet-wide targets for 2035 onwardsrom 2035 to 2039 EU fleet-wide target 2035 = EU fleet-wide target 2021· (1– reduction factor 2035) where: EU fleet-wide target2021 is as defined in point 6.0; Reduction factor2035 is as defined in Article 1(5a), point (b).
Amendment 392 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 14a – paragraph 1
Article 14a – paragraph 1
By 31 December 2025, and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall report on the progress towards zero emissionclimate neutral road mobility. The report shall in particular monitor and assess the need for possible additional measures to facilitate the transition, including through financial means.
Amendment 396 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3 a (new)
Annex I – part B – point 6.1.3 a (new)
6.1.3a. The EU fleet-wide target for 2040 onwards EU fleet-wide target2040 = EU fleet-widetarget2021· (1– reduction factor2040) where: EU fleet-wide target2021 is as defined in point 6.0; Reduction factor2040 is as defined in Article 1(5b), point (a).’
Amendment 398 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 14a – paragraph 2
Article 14a – paragraph 2
In the reporting, the Commission shall consider all factors that contribute to a cost-efficient progress towards climate neutrality by 2050. ThiFactors includes the deployment the following: a) the cost of zero- and low-emission vehicles b) consumer take-up of zero- and low- emission vehicles, c) the specific characteristics of light commercial vehicles d) progress in achieving the targets for thea sufficient roll- out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure including, but not limited to, progress in achieving the targets as required under the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation, and the Energy Performance of Building Directive, e) the potential contribution of innovation technologies and sustainable alternative fuels, including synthetic fuels, to reach climate neutral mobility, impact on consumers, progress in social dialogue as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition towards zero emission road mobility.;f) the functioning of the incentive mechanism for zero- and low-emission vehicles, g) impact on consumers, particularly those on low and medium incomes, h) progress in social dialogue as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition, taking into account employment and competitiveness, towards affordable climate neutral road mobility. For each of the factors listed above, the Commission shall issue an assessment of its effectiveness, taking into account expected progress, in enabling the 2030 and 2035 fleet average CO2 targets to be met.
Amendment 401 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
EU fleet-wide target2030 is as determined in accordance with point 6.1.3;2; α is a2030 where the average test mass of a manufacturer's new light commercial vehicles is equal to or lower than TM0 determined in accordance with point (d) of Article 14(1) and a2021 where the average test mass of a manufacturer's new light commercial vehicles is higher than TM0 determined in accordance with point (d) of Article 14(1); where: a2030 is a2021 · EU fleet-wide target2030 / Average emissions2021 a2021 is as defined in point 6.2.1; average emissions2021 is as defined in point 6.2.1; TM is as defined in point 6.2.1; TM0 is as defined in point 6.2.1.
Amendment 402 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
Amendment 403 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – part B – point 6.2.2
Amendment 427 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amending this Regulation. by introducing EU fleet-wide targets for passenger cars from 1 January 2035 and from 1 January 2040 as appropriate.’
Amendment 429 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
(aa) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: In the report referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall consider, inter alia, the real-world representativeness of the CO2 emission and fuel or energy consumption values determined pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007; the deployment on the Union market of zero- and low-emission vehicles, in particular with respect to light commercial vehicles; the roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure reported under Directive 2014/94/EU Regulation (xxx) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, including their financing; the implementation of Directive 2010/31/EU on the Energy Performance of buildings and its foreseen review; the potential contribution of the use of synthetic and advanced alternative fuels produced with renewable energy to emissions reductions; the CO2 emissions reduction actually observed at the existing fleet level; the functioning of the incentive mechanism for zero- and low-emission vehicles; the potential effects of the transitional measure set out in point 6.3 of Part A of Annex I; the impact of this Regulation on consumers, particularly on those on low and medium incomes; as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition towards clean, competitive and affordable mobility in the Union.
Amendment 439 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraphs 3 and 5
Article 15 – paragraphs 3 and 5
(b) paragraphs 23 to 5 are deleted,
Amendment 451 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I– paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I– paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1
Amendment 453 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1
Amendment 464 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.2
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.2
Amendment 469 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.2
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.2
Amendment 477 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 483 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 487 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 489 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 490 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.1.3
Amendment 519 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1 – subparagraph 4
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1 – subparagraph 4
ZLEVspecific = ( ( 1 – (specific emissions of CO250 )) ∙ 1,85 ∙ 0,7 CO2 ·0,750))·1,85
Amendment 533 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.2
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.2
6.3.2 Specific emissions targets for 2030 to 2034
Amendment 545 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.3
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.3
Amendment 574 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c – introductory part
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
(c) the following point 6.1.3 isand 6.1.4 are added:
Amendment 576 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
‘6.1.3. The EU fleet-wide targets for 2035 onwardsto 2039 EU fleet-wide target2035 = EU fleet-wide target 2021· (1– reduction factor2035) where: EU fleet-wide target2021 is as defined in point 6.0; Reduction factor2035 is as defined in Article 1(5a), point (b).
Amendment 580 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3 a (new)
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3 a (new)
(ca) The following point is inserted: ‘6.1.3 a. The EU fleet-wide target for 2040 onwards EU fleet-wide target2040 = EU fleet-wide target2021· (1– reduction factor2040) where: EU fleet-wide target2021 is as defined in point 6.0; Reduction factor2040 is as defined in Article 1(5b), point (a).’
Amendment 591 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
EU fleet-wide target2030 is as determined in accordance with point 6.1.3; 2; α is a2030 where the average test mass of a manufacturer's new light commercial vehicles is equal to or lower than TM0 determined in accordance with point (d) of Article 14(1) and a2021 where the average test mass of a manufacturer's new light commercial vehicles is higher than TM0 determined in accordance with point (d) of Article 14(1); where: a2030 is a2021 · EU fleet-wide target2030 / Average emissions2021 a2021 is as defined in point 6.2.1; average emissions2021 is as defined in point 6.2.1; TM is as defined in point 6.2.1; TM0 is as defined in point 6.2.1.
Amendment 592 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Amendment 595 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Amendment 596 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2
Amendment 141 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; recognises, however, the need to set balanced targets in each Member State, given the diversity of farming and forestry practices and the efforts made to date to observe the principles of economic, environmental and social sustainability;
Amendment 156 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to carry out holistic and cumulative assessments of the impact of the implementation of the strategy’s measures and targets on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture and forestry within and outside the EU, on food safety and on prices;
Amendment 172 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges the efforts made to date by the EU Member States and by the various sectors involved and stakeholders, in particular in the agriculture and forestry sector; emphasises that sustainable and effective management of natural processes is of the utmost importance for maintaining biodiversity, and that, in particular, greater efforts should be made to link different urban, agricultural and protected areas that support biodiversity in relation to the negative impact of climate change; recognises that the EU already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world;
Amendment 252 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses strong support forNotes the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth forest; stresses that impact assessments should evaluate the effects of increasing the protected areas, including losses; stresses that theseis target should be binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs, socio-economic aspects, and respect for the property rights of farmland and forest owners; underlines that, in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation and management plans implemented, together with adequate compensation for the effects suffered by stakeholders;
Amendment 253 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth forests and other carbon-rich ecosystems; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversitythat are specific to each site and biodiversity needs at local and regional level, as well as climate needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans, specific to each site, implemented;
Amendment 272 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that successful conservation of protected areas, including strictly protected areas, requires decision- making at the level of, and based on the needs of, the individual sites, taking into account the regional, socio-economic and cultural characteristics of the areas within the EU, with a view to promoting community-based conservation;
Amendment 274 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that the protection and restoration of rural areas and the protection of wild animal species must be consistent with local economic development, providing for sustainable management policies based on containment and careful monitoring of the spread of wildlife in the areas concerned;
Amendment 294 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises that it is important for the EU and the global biodiversity strategies to have the same level of ambition, particularly with regard to the level of protection; emphasises that the updated zero draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, which takes into account the results of the second meeting of the Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, does not include a reference to strict protection; calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that any soil protection targets are sufficiently flexible to allow their implementation to take account of the specific conditions and opportunities in each country and the rights of land and forest owners, with strict protection being a voluntary option for land and forest owners;
Amendment 316 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Stresses the need to clarify the definitions of the different elements of the strategy in consultation with Member States and stakeholders, in particular in the areas of agriculture, fisheries and forestry;
Amendment 329 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout all of their territory and based on thorough and convincing impact assessments; considers that in addition to an overall target for restoration target, ecosystem- specific targetopportunities should be setconsidered, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed; stresses the need to prioritise positive incentives and the voluntary participatory bottom-up process with a view to increasing acceptance, motivation and commitment to protecting and restoring biodiversity; calls, therefore, for a very careful approach to any new legally binding instruments;
Amendment 338 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout their territory, which should be based on scientific assessments; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem-specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;
Amendment 393 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; stresses that climate change has been assessed globally, with differences emerging between regions, and that its impact on nature is already being felt by ecosystems and by the genetic base of their component species; notes that this impact is expected to increase over the coming decades, in some cases outweighing the impact of changes in the use of the land and sea and other factors; emphasises that acting early in these areas is a priority;
Amendment 407 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need for the active involvement of all stakeholders at European, national, regional and local level so that they can take concrete action to effectively implement the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and to address any implementation gaps in the Habitats and Birds Directives;
Amendment 436 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common frameworka new soil strategy for the protection and sustainable use of soil, that includes a specific decontamination targeto be implemented in a manner consistent with other policies;
Amendment 460 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 479 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N); calls, in particular, on the Commission to share the administration of these TEN-G and TEN-N areas with local communities and with forestry, agriculture and research operators and all other stakeholders, by setting up intermediate management structures to encourage shared approaches for adopting effective, participatory, transparent and consistent long-term solutions that tackle biodiversity loss in a tangible manner;
Amendment 491 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to develop environmental regeneration processes by restoring natural areas in built-up zones, thereby encouraging the removal of unused, outdated or dilapidated buildings and infrastructure by private and public bodies; notes that this process would also help to improve the landscape and relieve citizens and local authorities of the tax burdens potentially involved in maintaining such properties;
Amendment 520 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices; supporting the development of organic farming in line with market trends, and ensuring, on a voluntary basis, that 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level; considers it imperative that farmers receive financial and other support as well as training in the transition towards more sustainable practices, and that products obtained in this way are properly promoted; notes, too, that all available production techniques should be used to ensure that there is sufficient supply to meet market demands;
Amendment 531 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % ofNotes the 2030 targets and is in favour of increasing agricultural land undefor organic farm management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % ofproduction or for other agroecological practices that are in line with market developments, and of devoting, by way of a voluntary approach, agricultural land consists ofat EU level to high- diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive financial and other support and training in the transition towards agroecological practicesmore sustainable practices, including by establishing appropriate compensation for products grown in this way;
Amendment 605 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; cCalls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;
Amendment 625 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that the maintenance and development of open areas for permanent grassland and pasture should be made a priority in order to protect at- risk species of wild birds and pollinators, which are primarily connected with this type of environment, including by clearing woodland in degraded areas consisting of matter of little environmental value;
Amendment 641 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully alignedconsistent with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;
Amendment 653 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific bindingpolicy targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;
Amendment 654 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Amendment 669 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on prosustainable forestation, sustainableclimate-adapted reforestation and the greening of urban areas; calls on the Commission to ensure that these initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives, and to guarantee the necessary biological connections between the different areas (urban, rural and protected) in the territories concerned;
Amendment 689 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 702 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains;
Amendment 771 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made bindingand nutrient losses by 2030; recognises that these targets could have a significant negative impact on the economic sustainability of the sector, on farmers’ incomes and on food safety, and should therefore be subject to an impact assessment before a targeted reduction is set; takes the view that farmers should be put in a position where they are able to use fewer products, or optimise their use, through greater investment and greater development in the areas of research, innovation and tools and precision agriculture techniques; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasoso as to respond to farmers’ actual needs with regard to the most dangerous pathogens;
Amendment 786 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. WelcomNotes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %,up to 50 %, reducing the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for agricultural reasons and assessed on the basis of health and environmental factorand limiting nutrient losses by 2030, in view of the need to safeguard the production potential of EU farms;
Amendment 794 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Stresses that, in order to achieve the stated objectives, it is essential to find alternative solutions to ensure that farmers have access to a range of suitable, safe, effective and affordable tools, as well as access to the latest information and technology and the best advisory services; calls on the Commission, in particular, to encourage and promote alternative solutions to pesticides and fertilisers, ensuring sufficient investment for their research and development; calls on the Commission, moreover, to revise the legislation to allow swift adjustments to be made when authorising alternative products in order to get them onto the market quickly;
Amendment 799 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Takes the view that a reduction in plant protection chemicals should be accompanied by a clear framework that would allow for the development and use of innovative technologies, including biotechnologies, provided that they are safe for consumers and the environment and widely accessible to farmers; calls for clarity on the ever-growing world of new plant-breeding techniques (NBTs) in order to regulate their areas of application and prospective use and thereby provide the necessary legal basis for their development in the field;
Amendment 813 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Looks forward to reading the Commission’s study on the potential of new genomic techniques, which should ultimately lead to an appropriate legal framework based on state-of-the-art scientific expertise and evidence;
Amendment 829 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 839 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the Commission to draw up a new proposal to develop pollinators’ habitats, harnessing the ecosystem services provided by the relevant sectoral operators and the benefits that they bring, by providing farmers with appropriate advice that, in exchange for fair compensation, allows plant species to be planted to boost pollinators’ health and crop diversification on farmland to improve the pollination service and preserve biodiversity;
Amendment 872 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the l, by 2030 at the latest, white lists that are mandatory and that apply to all Member Statest;
Amendment 874 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; cCalls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native speci, while taking due account of the implementation costs for Member States and the socioeconomic aspects of using IAS for income purposes, and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latests well as reinforcing prevention in the context of imports;
Amendment 887 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to give stakeholders all the power they need to take sweeping and concrete action to tackle invasive alien species as a matter of priority, both in terms of time and resources;
Amendment 892 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Calls on the Commission to equip Member States with urgent intervention measures to control general predatory species whose conservation status is favourable or on the rise and whose prominence in many environments, just as with IAS, is putting the populations of priority species at risk, for example many bird species that nest on the ground in open or cultivated areas or wetlands;
Amendment 909 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per yearresources needed for nature could be mobilised, to make corresponding proposals for the Union’s annual budget and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 %earmark a proportion of annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; calls on the Commission to draw up a legislative proposal that includes sufficient financial resources to compensate farmers for the increased costs and/or loss of income due to new practices designed to pursue the objectives of the biodiversity strategy;
Amendment 915 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per year needed for nature could be mobilised, to make corresponding proposals for the Union’s annual budget and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;
Amendment 928 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 932 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation so that the circulation and provision of foodstuffs are not negatively affected; calls on the Commission to consider forms of compensation in response to the potential economic losses incurred;
Amendment 965 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022 which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators;
Amendment 971 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establish which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators that factors in the actual achievement of the targets over a longer period of time in line with natural cycles, a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022s opposed to binding targets set using human-centred choices and legal instruments;
Amendment 1122 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of involving local fishing communities based far and wide across the Member States in recovering and tackling plastic littering in the seas in order to meet this objective, in exchange for fair compensation for operators;
Amendment 1138 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Stresses the importance of including respect for biodiversity in trade agreements in order to halt global deforestation and prevent the overexploitation of fishery and marine resources; urges developing countries to support biodiversity and alignment with European standards on sustainability, and to prevent the exploitation of workers; calls on the Commission to ensure that imported products meet the same standards required of European producers in order to protect biodiversity;
Amendment 1198 #
2020/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors, especially those most affected; calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition; stresses the importance of carrying out complete and in-depth impact assessments of the general strategy and any related legislative initiatives; stresses the need to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens when implementing the strategy;
Amendment 119 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 a (new)
Citation 24 a (new)
- having regard to Decision 5.COM 6.41 of 16 November 2010 of the UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, recognising the value of the Mediterranean Diet in terms of its many different elements, and having regard to the fact that this step has been recognised as fundamental by the FAO and the WHO for the contribution it can make to the Farm to Fork Strategy and EU food policies,
Amendment 231 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Europe’s food system shouldagri-food and fishing system delivers food and nutrition security in a way that, contributesing to social well- being and maintainsing and restoresing ecosystem health; whereas currently, the food system is responsible for a range ofhas an impacts on human and animal health and on the environment, the climate and biodiversity; whereas the way in which we produce and consume food needs to transform in orderadapt in order to continue to ensure coherence with the SDGs, the Paris Agreement, the Convention on Biological Diversity and EU policies, particularly in the areas of sustainability, the environment, climate, public health, animal welfare, food and economic sustainability for farmerall operators in the agro-food and fishing supply chains;
Amendment 280 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the European model of a multifunctional agricultural sector, mainly driven by family and small-scale farms, continues to ensure high-quality food production, short and local supply chains, good agriculture practices, high environmental standards and vibrant rural areas throughout the EU, despite an arsenal of restrictive regulations and trade globalisation that affect their competitiveness; whereas the European agricultural model is facing serious difficulties, such as fewer workers, generational and vocational renewal, low incomes and income inequality, extensive regulation and red tape, and international market pressures;
Amendment 359 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas it is important that consumers are informed and enabled to take responsibility for the consequences of their choice of food stuffs on the whole food system, from production to processing and distribution; whereas this requires a healthy and sound food environment which ensures that the healthy and sustainable choice is also the easy and affordable choice, and fosters and encourages consumption patterns that supportthat a safe and varied supply of agri-food products is ensured, benefiting human health while ensuring the sustainable use of natural and human resources and animal welfare;
Amendment 421 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the European food system has played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating its resilience with farmers and fisheries operators, processors and retailers working together under difficult conditions, including lockdowns, to ensure that European consumers continue to have access to safe, affordable, and high quality products without impediment;
Amendment 427 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Amendment 463 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the Farm to Fork commitments should protect and make the most of centuries of European food culture, and promote nutritional patterns that are well-established in the traditions and history of the European continent;
Amendment 488 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the farm to fork strategy as an important step in ensuring a sovereign, sustainable, fair and resilient food system, which is central to achievingcalls for a paradigm shift, particularly given the numerous agricultural imports that do not meet the goals set out in the European Green Deal and in the SDGs; emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies, healthy rural life and a healthy planet, encourages the Commission to translate the strategy into concrete legislative and non-legislative action as soon as possible and in consultation with stakeholders;
Amendment 496 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the farm to fork strategy as an important step in ensuring a sustainable, fair and resilient food system, which is central to achieving the goals set out in the European Green Deal and in the SDGs; emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies and a healthy planet, encourages the Commission to translate the strategy into concrete legislative and non-legislative action as soon as possible, following an impact assessment that takes into account the economic, environmental and social sustainability of the measures planned;
Amendment 585 #
2020/2260(INI)
2. WelcomNotes the announcement of an impact-assessed proposal forpreparatory to the drafting of a legislative framework for sustainable food systems; invites the Commission to use this proposal to set out a holistic common food policy aimed at reducassess, together with the other institutions of the EU and the actors ing the environmental and climate footprint of the EU foodagri-food sector, the effectiveness of a European approach to syustemainability and self-sufficiency in food in order to make Europe the first climate- neutral continent by 2050 and strengthen its resilience to ensure food security, quantity and quality in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss, leading a global transition towards sustainability from farm to fork, based on the principle of a multifunctional agricultural sector; stresses the importance of ensuring adequate support tools for the multifunctional agricultural sector during the energy transition phase, while ensuring consistency between policies by taking into account the existing legislation in order to enable all actors in the European food system to develop long- term plans based on realistic, achievable and transparent objectives; suggests that the respective base lines and progress achieved in each Member State be taken into account, while promoting the exchange of know-how and best practices between Member States; stresses the need to include the entire food and beverage chains including processing, marketing, distribution and retail;
Amendment 638 #
2020/2260(INI)
2a. Urges the Commission not to forget the key role that young farmers play, and must continue to play, in accomplishing this much-needed transition to sustainable farming; calls for measures designed to support income, generational renewal and training to create a space enabling the inclusion and retention of young people in agriculture;
Amendment 708 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 910 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of recognising the significantcorrectly assessing, recognising the positive role that agriculture already plays in carbon sequestration in soils, the impact of agriculture and especially animal production on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use, given the extent of these activities in relation to other production activities; stresses the need to enhance natural carbon sinks and reduce agricultural emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, in particular in the feed and livestock sectors; calls for regulatory measures and targets to ensure progressive reductions in all GHG emissions in these sectorsemissions and calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal that includes adequate financial resources to compensate farmers for the increased costs incurred or the loss of income they suffer in pursuing the decontamination target and to ensure more ambitious action on carbon sequestration and the use of products that biodegrade in the soil;
Amendment 967 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use solutions based on the circular economy, particularly biogas such as biomethane, in order to reduce the impact of agriculture and livestock production on air quality;
Amendment 1025 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that extensive and permanent grassland-based or organic animal husbandry is a feature ofthat meets animal welfare standards is essential for the European food system and a defining element of many traditional rural communities, and that it has multiplehas positive effects for the environment and against climate change, and contributes significantly to a circular economy;
Amendment 1047 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for appropriate investment incentives for modern indoor livestock rearing facilities and techniques that comply fully with animal welfare standards, which ensure the supply of foodstuffs of animal origin required by the EU population while also contributing to reducing emissions and combating climate change;
Amendment 1050 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to explore local slaughter solutions, with smaller units and better staff training on how to avoid animal suffering, and to make it compulsory to stun animals before they are slaughtered;
Amendment 1121 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils; stresses, however, that intensive and industrial agriculture and farming models with negative impacts on biodiversity should not receive climate funding or be incentivised; calls for th the need for a system of incentives that promotes biodiversity and the achievement of ambitious sustainability objectives, offering rewards that are proposrtionals to be in line with the environmental objectives and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the Green Dealthe scale of the commitments that farmers and processing companies wish to assume, individually or collectively;
Amendment 1179 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to guarantee a new regulatory approach requiring that new plant breeding techniques (NBTs) undergo specific case- by-case assessments to verify their agricultural, economic and environmental viability, in order to provide farmers in the EU with further directly available tools to address the reduction of inputs and ensure greater resilience and adaptation to climate change;
Amendment 1249 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for CAP National Strategic Plans to ensure adequate financial support and incentives to promote new ecological ‘green’ business modelecological production models such as organic and integrated production and other recognised systems for agriculture and artisanal food production, notably through fostering shortlocal supply chains and quality food production;
Amendment 1314 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the European foodagri-food and fisheries system delivers a sufficient and varied supply of safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food to people at all times and underlines that increasing the economic, environmental and social sustainability of food producers will ultimately increase their resilience; encourages the Commission to consider the food supply chain and its workers as a strategic asset for the safety and well-being of all Europeans;
Amendment 1333 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that robust and reliable legal frameworks for the fisheries and aquaculture sector should provide the basis for better protection measures with subsequent increases in fish populations and more clarity regarding the use of space and licenses in aquaculture, allowing for greater predictability for investments; stresses that good traceability mechanisms and high sustainability standards for all products sold on EU markets are essential to ensure transparency for consumers, the sector and the different administrations, and to achieve the targets of the Green Deal and the SDGs; development of projects able to incentivise the collection of maritime waste by operators in the fisheries sector, by recognising the strategic role they already play and could play further in terms of cleaning up the sea. Initiatives should be supported by strategies to improve the economic conditions for producers through policies to support, protect and maximise the value of fishery products, so as to enable operators to support environmental policies. Recognition of organic production could become a valuable support for sustainable growth;
Amendment 1367 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its deep concern about the emergence of zoonotic diseases that are transferred from animals to humans (anthropozoonoses), such as Q fever, avian influenza and the new strain of influenza A (H1N1), which is exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change, the destruction of biodiversity, environmental degradation and our current food production systemsthe importing of agri-food products from third countries that do not apply the same high standards in terms of quality, safety, and respect for the environment and human rights required for producers in the EU;
Amendment 1399 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its deep concern about the emergence of zoonotic diseases that are transferred from animals to humans (anthropozoonoses), such as Q fever, avian influenza and the new strain of influenza A (H1N1), which is exacerbated by faster trade around the world, anthropogenic climate change, the destruction of biodiversity, and environmental degradation and our current food production systems;
Amendment 1406 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Expresses its deep concern about the increasing number of imported diseases and invasive species that are threatening entire sectors of European agriculture, such as Xylella fastidiosa, the coffee berry borer, the Asian hornet, the western conifer seed bug and the brown marmorated stink bug;
Amendment 1421 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for primary producers to be supported in making the transition to greater sustainability through the encouragement of cooperation and collective actions as well as through competition rules and the enhancement of possibilities for cooperation among the various actors involved in the supply chain within the common market organisations for agricultural, fishery and aquaculture products, and thus for farmers’ and fishers’ position in the supply chain to be strengthened in order to enable them to capture a fair share of the added value of sustainable production; takes the view that supply chain agreements should be implemented and supported to ensure a fair distribution of value to farmers and fishing contractors and to guarantee greater transparency and traceability in the supply chain as a whole;
Amendment 1472 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Commission to follow up on Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices22 and the EU code of conduct on responsible business and marketing practices by producing a monitoring framework for the food and retail sectors and providing for legal action if progress in integrating economic, environmental and social sustainability into corporate strategies is insufficient, and in so doing promoting and rewarding the efforts of sustainable agricultural producers while increasing the availability and affordability of healthy, sustainable food options and reducing the overall environmental footprint of the food system; stresses the importance of halting and addressing consolidation and concentration in the grocery retail sector in order to ensure fair prices for farmers; notes the importance of timely application of the directive on unfair trading practices to combat fraud in the agri-food chain, and the right of consumers to cater to their own protein needs in full awareness of the plant or animal origin of a given name used in the sale of a food product; _________________ 22 OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 59.
Amendment 1478 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Commission to follow up on Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices22 and the EU code of conduct on responsible business and marketing practices by producing a monitoring framework for the food and retail sectors and providing for legal action if progress in integrating economic, environmental and social sustainability into corporate strategies is insufficient, and in so doing promoting and rewarding the efforts of sustainable agricultural producers while increasing the availability and affordability of healthy, sustainable food options and reducing the overall environmental footprint of the food systemsales channels use the nutritional labelling system as a direct tool for commercial promotion; stresses the importance of halting and addressing consolidation and concentration in the grocery retail sector in order to ensure fair prices for farmers; _________________ 22 OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 59.
Amendment 1497 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Supports the Commission in its efforts to combat food fraud, which misleads consumers and distorts competition in the internal market; regards it as essential to make the penalties imposed on fraudsters more dissuasive, to earmark sufficient resources so that checks can be stepped up and to establish a legal definition at EU level of the concepts of ‘food fraud and crime’ and ‘counterfeiting’;
Amendment 1509 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Urges the Commission to meet its commitments in terms of health security, protection of biodiversity and prevention of unfair competition when it sets the maximum residue limits for pesticides in agricultural products authorised for import under free trade agreements, and particularly when those products contain residues of pesticides banned in the EU;
Amendment 1571 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to identify practical ways of encouraging short supply chains, such as an exemption from VAT for products sold less than 100 km from their production site, and providing public spaces for the regular or seasonal sale of products from micro- enterprises or regional cooperatives;
Amendment 1605 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls the need to promote effective, innovative and flexible Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), enabling agricultural enterprises to stay on the market in a competitive and sustainable way, ensuring vitality in rural areas, and enabling all food chain actors to become sustainable by speeding up innovation and accelerating knowledge transfer; recalls, in addition, the need for a farm sustainability data network to set benchmarks for farm performance and document the uptake of sustainable farming practices, while allowing for the precise and tailored application of new production approaches at farm level by providing farmers with access to fast broadband connections;
Amendment 1617 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the need to better inform consumers through mandatory labelling of all foods in relation to country of origin, providing a clear and transparent tool for the entire agri-food chain that is applied uniformly throughout the European market;
Amendment 1641 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health;regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatland consumer information campaigns to promote healthier diets that provide information on the importance of a varied and balanced diet that does not exclude any food, provided that it is consumed in the right amount and frequency and is accompanied by adelayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt; calls for a mandatoryquate physical activity; welcomes efforts to harmonise EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition labelling systems, provided that they are voluntary, and based on the portions actually consumed and on independent science, eschewing simplistic solutions that could influence consumers’ decisions, as opposed to providing them with information on actual nutritional intake and balanced diets; believes that the instruments to harmonise EU-wide front- of- pack nutrition labelling system based on independent sciencehould exclude the use of simplified categories and/or categories represented by colour schemes or traffic lights, such as the ‘Nutriscore’ model;
Amendment 1642 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health;regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatland consumer information campaigns to promote healthier diets that provide information on the importance of a varied and balanced diet that does not exclude any food, provided that it is consumed in the right amount and frequency, and is accompanied by adelayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt;calls for a mandatoryquate physical activity; welcomes efforts to harmonise EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition labelling systems, provided that they are voluntary, and based on the portions actually consumed and on independent science, eschewing simplistic solutions that could influence consumers’ decisions, as opposed to providing them with information on actual nutritional intake and balanced diets; believes that a harmonised EU-wide front- of-pack nutrition labelling system based on independent sciencemust meet the requirements laid down in Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011;
Amendment 1687 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the importance of the Commission’s proposal to introduce a harmonised front-of-pack (FOP) labelling system based on sound scientific evidence and supported by accurate impact assessments; calls on the Commission to take into account the actual daily intake of food and drink to avoid sending misleading messages to the consumer; takes the view that a harmonised scheme at EU level must be easy to understand and must not be misleading, and therefore advises against the use of colours that would convey a simplistic message without providing details of the method used to attribute them; expresses its concern that products protected by PDO and PGI labels might be penalised, since they are governed by production rules laying down the raw materials and production methods to be used, and as such cannot be changed;
Amendment 1725 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to revise the EU legislation on food contact materials (FCM); reiterates its call to revise the legislation on FCM in line with the regulation on the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH), as well as classification, labelling and packaging regulations, and to insert, without further delay, specific provisions to substitute endocrine disrupting chemicals; stresses that the introduction of more sustainable materials could lead to additional costs for producers and that new obligations should take proper account of the time needed for introduction and actual availability of alternative packaging materials and solutions;
Amendment 1785 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the fact that the strategy rightly recognises the role and influence of the food environment in shaping consumption patterns and the need to make it easier for consumers to chooseAcknowledges that the strategy must make the most of the role of the agri- food chain in allowing the products offered on the domestic market to stand out and emphasise the need to provide correct information to consumers to enable them to plan healthy and sustainable diets; reiterates the importance of promoting sustainablebalanced diets by raising consumer awareness of the impacts of consumption patterns and providing information on diets that are better for human health and have a lower environmental footprint; underlines that food prices must send the right signal to consumers; welcomes, therefore, the strategy’s objective that the healthy and suthrough a voluntary system of indications with a sound scientific basis and based on actual portions consumed; underlines that food prices must adequately support the supply chain in its efforts to deliver high standards of food safety, quality and the distainable choice should become the most affordable onective character of European products on the markets;
Amendment 1838 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Reaffirms its belief that policy measures that are dependent solely on consumer choice unduly shift the responsibility to purchase sustainable and local products to consumers; notes that third- party certification and labelling alone are not effective in ensuring sustainable production and consumption;
Amendment 1857 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the recognition in the strategy that Europeans’ diets are not in line with recommendations for healthy eating, and that a population-wide shift in consumption patterns is needed towards more healthy and plant-based foods and less red and processed meat, sugars, salt, and fats, which will also benefit the environment; eEmphasises that EU-wide guidelines for sustainable and healthy diets would bring clarity to consumers on what constitutes a healthy and sustainable diet and inform Member States’ own efforts to integrate sustainability elements in national dietary advice; calls on the Commission to develop such guidelines and specific actions to effectively promote healthy plant-based diets;
Amendment 1881 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the recognition in the strategy that Europeans’ diets are not in line with recommendations for healthy eating, and that a population-wide shift in consumption patterns is needed towards more healEmphasises that the strategy must be taken as a starting point for building a framework of rules to ensure that consumers are given complete and scientifically correct information to enable them to plan healthy diets; notes that food safety and quality are also crucial for the value they and plant-based foods and less red and processed meat, sugars, salt, and fats, which will also benefit the environment; emphasises that EU-wide guidelines for sustainable and healthy diets would bring clarity to consumers on what constitutes a healthy and sustainable diet and inform Member States’ own efforts to integrate sustainability elements in national dietary advice; calls on the Commission to develop such guidelines and specific actions to effectively promote healthy plant-based dietsdeliver to the supply chain, and that Europe’s agricultural production must guarantee the variety and quality of all the major nutrients that contribute to good human health; stresses that any public initiative involving information messages on food diets must not be used for promotional or commercial purposes; notes the input of the Member States on national dietary advice and invites them to integrate environmental sustainability elements as necessary; calls on the Commission to develop a proper information campaign on balanced and healthy diets and to promote physical exercise as another essential component of human well-being;
Amendment 1916 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Encourages the Member States to promote food education through their culinary traditions, understanding of their land and learning to cook from a very young age and in school;
Amendment 1918 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Points out that artificial food made in laboratories has little taste and few nutritional qualities, always contains additives, and has not been properly assessed in terms of its toxicity; emphasises, in this respect, that artificial food is an aberration and an attempt by laboratories to pre-empt the food sector, which could have long-term consequences on prices and agricultural jobs;
Amendment 1942 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the further development of plant protein production and alternative sources of protein in the EU is a way of effectively addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that EU agriculture is facing, as well as preventing deforestation in countries outside the EU and reducing Europe’s current dependence regarding its supply of plant proteins;
Amendment 1957 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Considers that the European food system is among the best in the world, and that the added value for the supply chain is based on food production that cannot be significantly replaced or provided by edible insects, which are alien to European food traditions;
Amendment 2106 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusivelocal European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecological practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States; points out the need to take account of the accumulated delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which is hindering the economic recovery efforts aimed at continental and overseas farmers and fishers, with those overseas particularly suffering from their remoteness and island location;
Amendment 2124 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecologicalsustainable practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services for all actors in the agri-food chain in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming communitysector, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States for farmers and all actors in the supply chain, without introducing additional administrative burdens;
Amendment 2193 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting, to never lower our requirements to meet import conditions defined in free trade agreements, and to make those standards strictly mandatory for gaining access to the European market, so that European continental or overseas producers and producers outside Europe are subject to those standardame market conditions; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account; calls on the Commission to revise the free trade agreements, given the environmental impact that some agricultural products imported from third countries may have;
Amendment 2213 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the farm to fork objectives are implemented gradually, taking account of the level of overall agreement on them, and to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account;
Amendment 2220 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all farm, food and feed products imported to the EU, including the raw materials needed to produce them, fully meet the relevant EU regulations and the Union’s high standards and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account;
Amendment 2239 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Believes that environmental, social and economic sustainability must be at the heart of the future EU trade policy and every bilateral trade agreement, adopting an approach to trade policies with third countries that safeguards the value of European farmers’ environmental sustainability efforts;
Amendment 10 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission communication on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan (COM(2020)0021), which aims to enable a just and well-managed transition towards a resilient and sustainable society; emphasises, however, that it is imperative that the EU achieve the revised 2030 and 2050 climate and biodiversity goals and reach its commitmentimplement anti-cyclical policies to counteract the seriously deflationary cycle that has been sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic and, therefore, adjust the 2030 climate goals downwards uander the Paris Agreement, based on the best available science postpone the 2050 goals to a date to be decided;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Expects a new, unprecedented MFF, endowed with fresh money, and enhanced and new EU own resources, to be at the heart of the green transitionCalls for a complete refocus of the priorities for the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF), taking into account the socio-economic impact of the pandemic in the medium to long term; calls for the budget envisaged for ‘climate mainstreaming’ to instead be mobilised for COVID-19-related measures;
Amendment 51 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Commits to a just recovery from the coronavirus crisis that ensur; emphasises, that taxpayers’ moneyerefore, its invested in the future, not the past; that conditions fiscal expansion to drcommitment not to conceive of the shift to a green economy and make societies and people more resilient; that employs public funds to climate proof sectors and projects, thereby generating green jobs and sustainable growth; that incorporates climate riskEuropean Green Deal as an instrument for imposing further, more rigid external constraints on Member States’ economic and fiscal policies, but rather to use it as and opportunities into the financial system, as well as all aspects of public policymaky to bring the issue of the environment back withing and infrastructure; and that guarantees an end to fossil fuel subsidies and applies the polluter pays principle context of rational debate and in order to balance environmental and social policies;
Amendment 73 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 91 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 108 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the proceeds of any future EU backedissues of recovery bonds are issued in accordance with the EU Grbacked by the EU budget are allocated, without macro-economic conditions, to the Member States whose economies have been most badly damaged by the COVID-19 pandemic, provided that Member States which are net contributors to the EU budget do not have a negative balance between Bcond Standard; tributing and receiving;
Amendment 123 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to come forward with an EU taxonomy for the public sector and a greelegislative proposals to streamline and simplify EU legislation on public procurement regulation;
Amendment 137 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to revise State aid rules to allow public support for the European Green Deal and to reform the European Semester to deepen the inclusion of the Sustainable Development Goals and the European Pillar of Social Rightsput an end to the European Semester;
Amendment 155 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for anyll public investments that are necessary for climate mitigation, adaptation and the just transitioneconomic recovery post- COVID-19, including investments for the implementation of environmental and climate policies, to be exempted from the Stability and Growth Pact.
Amendment 164 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Opposes the introduction of new EU own resources, which will lead, in the final analysis, to greater fiscal pressure on citizens and enterprises and reduced democratic control over economic and fiscal policies;
Amendment 168 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Demands the replacement of the EU’s Emissions Trading System with a carbon border adjustment mechanism that is compliant with the World Trade Organization’s standards and is based on the carbon footprint of imported goods, taking into account direct emissions, emissions from electricity generation and emissions from the use of raw materials; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support this trade measure with appropriate incentives for the re- importation of products that have been delocalised and produced in third countries;
Amendment 176 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Warns the Commission against the use of financial engineering and dubious multipliers to advertise ambitious figures, which, however, do not represent the true size of the budget;
Amendment 179 #
2020/2058(INI)
9d. 10. Notes that the involvement of BlackRock, the Commission’s new advisor for ‘sustainable finance’, could give rise to conflicts of interest in the carrying out of its tasks. 1a _________________ 1athis amendment is intended to add a new paragraph 10.
Amendment 605 #
2020/0353(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. From 1 January 2030, industrial batteriBy 31 December 2025, the Commission shall assess, electric vehicle batteries and automotive batteries with internal storage and a capacity above 2 kWh that contain cobalt, lead, lithium or nickel in active materials shall be accompanied by technical documentation demonstrating that those batteries contain the following minimum share of cobalt, lead, lithium or nickel recovered from waste present in active materials in each battery model and batch per manufacturing plant: (a) (b) (c) (d)whether due to the availability of cobalt, lead, lithium or nickel recovered from waste, it is appropriate and justified to introduce targets on minimum share of materials recovered from waste, and, where appropriate, shall submit a legislative proposal for that purpose; 12% cobalt; 85% lead; 4% lithium; 4% nickel.
Amendment 702 #
2020/0353(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a) The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to introduce, in the form of an accompanying technical documentation, electrochemical performance and durability parameters for electric vehicle batteries resulting from the work of the UNECE Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment;
Amendment 837 #
2020/0353(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The provisions of this Article shall apply in addition to those laid down in Union law on type approval of vehicles.Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to introduce parameters for determining the state of health and expected lifetime of batteries for electric vehicle batteries resulting from the work of UNECE Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment;
Amendment 204 #
2020/0321(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In order to ensure the full application of Article 35 of Regulation (EU) no.536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council 1a, with regard to emergency clinical trials on subjects unable to provide informed consent, a special independent monitoring committee for emergency clinical trials is setup, in order to avoid the duplication of similar studies that could harm the human dignity and to ensure closer pharmacovigilance due to the particularity of the trial in question. _________________ 1a Regulation (EU) no 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 158/1, p. 34. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/fil es/files/eudralex/vol- 1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf
Amendment 7 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The CovidOVID-19 pandemic is a major shock to the global and Union economy. Due to the necessary containment measures, economic activity in the EU dropped significantly. The contraction in EUMember States' GDP in 2020 is expected to be around 7.5%the worst since the Great Depression, far deeper than during the financial crisis in 2009. The outbreak of the pandemic has shown the interconnectivity of global supply chains and exposed some vulnerabilities such as the over-reliance of strategic industries on non-diversified external supply sources. Such vulnerabilities need to be addressed, to improve the Union’s emergency response as well as the resilience of the entire economy, while maintaining its openness to competition and trade in line with its rules. Investment activity is expected to have dropped significantly. Even before the pandemic, while a recovery in investment-to-GDP ratios in the Union could be observed, it remained below what might be expected in a strong recovery and was insufficient to compensate for years of underinvestment following the 2009 crisis. More importantly, the current investment levels and forecasts do not cover the Union’s needs for structural investment to restart and sustain long-term growth in the face of technological change and global competitiveness, including for innovation, skills, infrastructure, small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) and the need to address key societal challenges such as sustainability or population ageing. Consequently, in order to achieve the Union's policy objectives and to support a swift, inclusive and healthy economic recovery, support is necessary to address market failures and sub-optimal investment situations and to reduce the investment gap in targeted sectors.
Amendment 12 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In the last years, the Union has adopted ambitious strategies to complete the Single Mternal market and to stimulate sustainable and inclusive growth and jobs, such as 'Europe 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' of 3 March 2010, 'Action Plan on Building a Capital Markets Union' of 30 September 2015, 'A new European Agenda for Culture' of 22 May 2018, 'Clean Energy for all Europeans' of 30 November 2016, 'Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy' of 2 December 2015, 'A European Strategy for Low- Emission Mobility' of 20 July 2016, ‘European Defence Action Plan’ of 30 November 2016, 'Launching the European Defence Fund' of 7 June 2017, 'Space Strategy for Europe' of 26 October 2016, the Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights of 13 December 2017, the ‘European Green Deal’ of 11 December 2019, the ‘European Green Deal Investment Plan’ of 14 January 2020, the ‘Strong Social Europe for Just Transitions’ of 14 January 2020, the ‘Strategy for shaping Europe’s digital future’, the ‘Data Strategy’ and the ‘Artificial Intelligence Communication’ of 19 February 2020, ‘A New Industrial Strategy for Europe’ of 10 March 2020 and ‘SME Strategy for a sustainable and digital Europe’ of 10 March 2020. The InvestEU Fund should exploit and reinforce synergies between those mutually reinforcing strategies through providing support to investment and access to financing. (This amendment applies throughout the text.)
Amendment 13 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States, where appropriate in cooperation with local and regional authorities, develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of those reform priorities. Those strategies should be presented alongside the yearly national reform programmes as a way of outlining and coordinating priority investment projects that are to be supported by national funding, Union funding, or both. Those strategies should also use Union funding in a coherent manner and maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the European structural and investment funds, the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the InvestEU Programme. However, country-specific recommendations have often had counterproductive macro- economic effects; notably, in the field of public health they have recommended the weakening of public health systems in several Member States, which therefore found themselves less equipped to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak.
Amendment 16 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 21 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 23 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
Amendment 33 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The contribution of the InvestEU Fund to the achievement of the climate target will be tracked through a Union climate tracking system to be developed by the Commission in cooperation with potential implementing partners, appropriately using the criteria established by [Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment25 ] for determining whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable. The InvestEU Programme should also contribute to the implementation of other dimensions of the SDGs. _________________ 25. COM(2018)353.
Amendment 41 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Investment projects that receive substantial Union support, in particular in the area of infrastructure, should be screened by the implementing partner to determine whether they have an environmental, climate or social impact. Investment projects that have such an impact should be subject to sustainability proofing in accordance with guidance that should be developed by the Commission in close cooperation with potential implementing partners under the InvestEU Programme. This guidance should appropriately use the criteria established by [Regulation on establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment] for determining whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable and consistent with the guidance developed for other programmes of the Union. Consistent with the principle of proportionality, such guidance should include adequate provisions for avoiding undue administrative burdens, and projects below a certain size as to be defined in the guidance should be excluded from the sustainability proofing. Where the implementing partner concludes that no sustainability proofing is to be carried out, it should provide a justification to the Investment Committee established for the InvestEU Fund. Operations that are inconsistent with the achievement of the climate objectives should not be eligible for support under this Regulation.
Amendment 96 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) growth and employment in the Union economy, the sustainability of the Union economy and its environmental and climate dimension contributing to the achievement of the SDGs and the objectives of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and to the creation of high-quality jobs;
Amendment 167 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Implementing partners shall apply a target of at least 60 % of the investment under the sustainable infrastructure policy window contributing to meeting the Union objectives on climate and environment.deleted
Amendment 194 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 1 – introductory part
Annex II – point 1 – introductory part
1. The development of the energy sector in accordance with the Energy Union priorities, including security of energy supply, clean energy transition and the commitments taken under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, in particular through:
Amendment 206 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 3 – point f
Annex II – point 3 – point f
(f) climate change actions, climate adaptation and mitigadaptation, including natural hazard disaster risk reduction;
Amendment 209 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 3 – point j
Annex II – point 3 – point j
(j) projects that promote sustainable culturalcultural and landscape heritage.
Amendment 236 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c
Annex V – part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c
(c) projects equipped with carbon capture and storage or carbon capture and utilisation installations; industrial or research projects that lead to substantial reductions of greenhouse gas emissions as compared with the applicable EU Emission Trading System benchmarks
Amendment 238 #
2020/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
Annex V – part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
(b) existing plants, where the investment is for the purpose of increasing energy efficiency, capturing exhaust gases for storage or use or recovering materials from incineration ashes, provided such investments do not result in an increase of the plants' waste processing capacity.
Amendment 4 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination (‘European Semester’), including the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of those reforms. Those strategies should be presented alongside the yearlyon a three-year basis as an annex to the National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and/or Union funding.
Amendment 9 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The implementation of the investments and reforms contributing to achieve a high degree of resilience of domestic economies, allowing constraints flexibility, strengthening adjustment capacity and unlocking growth potential without involving pro-cyclical effects are among the Union’s policy priorities. They are therefore crucial to set the recovery on a sustainable path and support the process of upward economic and social convergence. This is even more necessary in the aftermath of the pandemic crisis to pave the way for a swift recovery.
Amendment 18 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Currently, nNo instrument should foresees direct financial support linked to the achievement of results and to implementation of reforms and public investments of the Member States in response to challenges identified in the European Semester, and with a view to having a lasting impact on the productivity and resilience of the economy of the Member States.
Amendment 27 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Against this background, it is necessary to strengthenadapt the current framework for the provision of support to Member States and provide direct financial support to Member States through an innovative tool. To that end, a Recovery and Resilience Facility (the ‘Facility’) should be established under this Regulation to provide effective financial and significant support to step up the implementation of counter-cyclical reforms and related public investments in the Member States. The Facility should be comprehensive and should also benefit from the experience gained by the Commission and the Member States from the use of the other instruments and programmes.
Amendment 31 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
Amendment 43 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to implement these overall objectivesboost economical recovery, relevant actions will be identified during the Facility’s preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes. Also, due attention should be paid to the impact of the national plans submitted under this Regulation on fostering not only the green transition, but also the digital transformation. They will both play a priority role in relaunching and modernising our economy.
Amendment 45 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 54 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Facility’s general objective should be the promotion of economic, social and territorial cohesion. For that purpose, it should contribute to improving the resilience and adjustment capacity of the Member States, mitigating the social and economic impact of the crisis, and supporting the green and digital transitions aimed at achieving a climate neutral Europe by 2050, thereby restoring the growth potential of the economies of the Union in the aftermath of the crisis, fostering employment creation and to promoting sustainable growth.
Amendment 59 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The specific objective of the Facility should be to provide financial support with a view to achieving the milestones and targets of countercyclical reforms and investments as set out in recovery and resilience plans. That specific objective should be pursued in close cooperation with the Member States concerned.
Amendment 62 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) To ensure its contribution to the objectives of the Facility, the recovery and resilience plan should comprise measures for the implementation of reforms and public investment projects through a coherent recovery and resilience plan. The recovery and resilience plan should be consistent with the relevant country- specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semester, with the national reform programmes, the national energy and climate plans, the just transition plans, and the partnership agreements and operational programmes adopted under the Union funds. To boost actions that fall within the priorities of the European Green Deal and the Digital Agenda, the plan should also set out measures that are relevant for the green and digital transitions. The measures should enable a swift deliver of targets, objectives and contributions set out in national energy and climate plans and updates thereofby the Member States in the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental prioritiestandards of the Union.
Amendment 68 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 72 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) To inform the preparation and the implementation of the recovery and resilience plans by Member States, the Council should be able to discuss, within the European Semester, the state of recovery, resilience, cohesion and adjustment capacity in the Union. To ensure appropriate evidence, this discussion should be based on the Commission’s strategic and analytical information available in the context of the European Semester and, if available, on the basis of the information on the implementation of the plans in the preceding years.
Amendment 74 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure a meaningful financial contribution commensurate to the actual needs of Member States to undertake and complete the reforms and investments included in the recovery and resilience plan, it is appropriate to establish a maximum financial contribution available to them under the Facility as far as the financial support (i.e. the non- repayable financial support) is concerned. That maximum contribution should be calculated on the basis of the demographic trend (taking into account the depopulation rate), the inversempact of the per capitaCOVID-19 outbreak on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the relative unemployment rate of each Member State.
Amendment 76 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure the national ownership and a focus on relevant reforms and investments, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission a recovery and resilience plan that is duly reasoned and substantiated. The recovery and resilience plan should set out the detailed set of measures for its implementation, including targets and milestones, and the expected impact of the recovery and resilience plan on growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience; it should also include measures that are relevant for the green and the digital transitions; it should also include an explanation of the consistency of the proposed recovery and resilience plan with the relevant country-specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semesterbe ecologically responsible. Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States should be sought and achieved throughout the process.
Amendment 83 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The Commission should assess the recovery and resilience plan proposed by the Member States and should act in close cooperation with the Member State concerned. The Commission will fully respect the national ownership of the process and will therefore take into account the justification and elements provided by the Member State concerned and assess whether the recovery and resilience plan proposed by the Member State is expected to contribute to effectively address challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendation addressed to the Member State concerned or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester; whether the plan contains measures that effectively contribute to the green and the digital transitions and to addressing the challenges resulting from them; whether the plan is expected to have a lasting impact in the Member State concerned; whether the plan is expected to effectively contribute to strengthen the growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience of the Member State, mitigate the economic and social impact of the crisis and contribute to enhancing economic, social and territorial cohesion; whether the justification provided by the Member State of the estimated total costs of the recovery and resilience plan submitted is reasonable and plausible and is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment; whether the proposed recovery and resilience plan contains measures for the implementation of reforms and public investment projects that represent coherent actions; and whether the arrangement proposed by the Member State concerned are expected to ensure effective implementation of the recovery and resilience plan, including the proposed milestones and targets, and the related indicators.
Amendment 94 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) To ensure that the financial support is frontloaded in the initial years after the crisis, and to ensure compatibility with the available funding for this instrument, the allocation of funds to the Member States should be made available until 31 December 2024. To this effect, at least 670 percent of the amount available for non- repayable support should be legally committed by 31 December 2022. The remaining amount should be legally committed by 31 December 2024.
Amendment 97 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The request for a loan should be justified by the financial needs linked to additional countercyclical reforms and investments included in the recovery and resilience plan, notably relevant for the green and digital transitions, and by therefore, by a higher cost of the plan than the maximum financial contribution (to be) allocated via the non-repayable contribution. It should be possible to submit the request for a loan together with the submission of the plan. In case the request for loan is made at a different moment in time, it should be accompanied by a revised plan with additional milestones and targets. To ensure frontloading of resources, Member States should request a loan support at the latest by 31 August 2024. For the purposes of sound financial management, the total amount of all the loans granted under this Regulation should be capped. In addition, the maximum volume of the loan for each Member State should not exceed 4.7% of its Gross National Income. An increase of the capped amount should be possible in exceptional circumstances subject to available resources. For the same reasons of sound financial management, it should be possible to pay the loan in instalments against the fulfilment of results.
Amendment 100 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) A Member State should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the recovery and resilience plan within the period of implementation, where objective circumstances justify such a course of action. The Commission should assess the reasoned request and take a new decision within fourthree months.
Amendment 102 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) For the purpose of sound financial management, specific rules should be laid down for budget commitments, payments, suspension, cancellation and recovery of funds. To ensure predictability, it should be possible for Member States to submit requests for payments on a biannual basis. Payments should be made in instalments and be based on a positive assessment by the Commission of the implementation of the recovery and resilience plan by the Member State. Suspension and cancellation of the financial contribution should be possible when the recovery and resilience plan has not been implemented in a satisfactory manner by the Member State. Appropriate contradictory procedures should be established to ensure that the decision by the Commission in relation to suspension, cancellation and recovery of amounts paid respects the right of Member States to provide observations.
Amendment 105 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) For effective monitoring of implementation, the Member States should report on a quarteyearly basis within the European Semester process on the progress made in the achievement of the recovery and resilience plan. Such reports prepared by the Member States concerned should be appropriately reflected in the National Reform Programmes, which should be used as a tool for reporting on progress towards completion of recovery and resilience plans.
Amendment 110 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) In accordance with the Financial Regulation, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 , Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2988/9515and ,Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/9616 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/193917 , the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities and fraud, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative sanctions. In particular, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 and Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out administrative investigations, including on- the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) may investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 . In accordance with the Financial Regulation, any person or entity receiving Union funds is to fully cooperate in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, to grant the necessary rights and access to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the European Court of Auditors and to ensure that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the European Court of Auditors. _________________ 14Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999,(OJ L248, 18.9.2013, p. 1) 15 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.95, p.1) 16 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L292,15.11.96, p.2) 17 Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (OJ L283, 31.10.2017,, p.1) 18 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29)
Amendment 113 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Amendment 124 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The scope of application of the Recovery and Resilience Facility established by this Regulation shall refer to policy areas related to economic, social and territorial cohesion, the green and digital transitions, health, competitiveness, resilience, productivity, education and skills, research and innovation, smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, jobs and investment, and the stability of the financial systems.
Amendment 134 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Recovery and Resilience Facility shall be to promote the Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion by improving the resilience and adjustment capacity of the Member States, mitigating the social and economic impact of the crisis, and supporting the green and digital transitions, thereby contributing to restoring the growth potential of the economies of the Union, fostering employment creation in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, and promoting sustainable growth.
Amendment 140 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. To achieve that general objective, the specific objective of the Recovery and Resilience Facility shall be to provide Member States with financial support with a view to achieving the milestones and targets of countercyclical reforms and investments as set out in their recovery and resilience plans. That specific objective shall be pursued in close cooperation with the Member States concerned.
Amendment 146 #
2020/0104(COD)
2. The amounts referred to in paragraph 1(a) may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, which are required for the management of each instrument and the achievement of its objectives, in particular studies, meetings of experts, information and communication actions, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, in so far as they are related to the objectives of this Regulation, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information processing and exchange, corporate information technology tools, and all other technical and administrative assistance expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of each instrument. EThe same amount of expenses may also cover the costs of other supporting activities such as quality control and monitoring of projects on the ground and the costs of peer counselling and experts for the assessment and implementation of countercyclical reforms and investments.
Amendment 148 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6
Article 6
Amendment 153 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In the event of significant non- compliance in relation to any of the cases laid down in Article 15(7) of the Regulation laying down common provisions on the […)][CPR], the Council shallmay, on a proposal from the Commission, adopt a decision by means of an implementing act to suspend the time period for the adoption of the decisions referred to in Articles 17(1) and 17(2) or to suspend payments under the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
Amendment 156 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
A maximum financial contribution shall be calculated for each Member State for the allocation of the amount referred to in Article 5(1)(a), using the methodology set out in Annex I, based on the demographic trend (taking into account the depopulation rate), the inverse of the per capitampact of COVID- 19 outbreak on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the relative unemployment rate of each Member State.
Amendment 158 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. For a period starting after 31 December 2022 until 31 December 2024, where financial resources are available, the Commission may organise calls in line with the calendar of the European Semester. To that effect, it shall publish an indicative calendar of the calls to be organised in that period, and shall indicate, at each call, the amount available for allocation. Each Member State may propose to receive up to a maximum amount corresponding to its allocation share of the available amount for allocation, as referred to in Annex I, to implement the recovery and resilience plan.
Amendment 159 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the reasons for the loan support, justified by the higher financial needs linked to additional countercyclical reforms and investments;
Amendment 160 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the additional countercyclical reforms and investments in line with Article 15;
Amendment 163 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the additional countercyclical reforms and investments comply with the criteria set out in Article 16(3.
Amendment 164 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the other elements needed for the implementation of the loan support in relation to the countercyclical reforms and the investment projects concerned in line with the decision referred to in Article 17(2).
Amendment 175 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The recovery and resilience plans shall be consistent with the relevant country-specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semester, in particular those relevant for or resulting from the green and digital transitionby the Member States. The recovery and resilience plans shall also be consistent with the information included by the Member States in the national reform programmes under the European Semester, in their national energy and climate plans and updates thereof under the Regulation (EU)2018/199921 , in the territorial just transition plans under the Just Transition Fund22 , and in the partnership agreements and operational programmes under the Union funds. _________________ 21Regulation (EU)2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. 22 […]
Amendment 183 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Amendment 188 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The recovery and resilience plan presented by the Member State concerned shall constitute an annex to its National Reform Programme and shall be officially submitted on a three-year basis at the latest by 30 April. A draft plan may be submitted by Member State starting from 15 October of the preceding year, together with the draft budget of the subsequent year.
Amendment 189 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 195 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
Amendment 215 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d
Amendment 221 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point f
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) the estimated total cost of the countercyclical reforms and investments covered by the recovery and resilience plan submitted (also referred as ‘estimated total cost of the recovery and resilience plan’) backed up by appropriate justification and how it is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment;
Amendment 230 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. When assessing the recovery and resilience plan and in the determination of the amount to be allocated to the Member State concerned, the Commission shall take into account the analytical information on the Member State concerned available in the context of the European Semester as well as the justification and the elements provided by the Member State concerned, as referred to in Article 15(3), and any other relevant information including, in particular, the one contained in the National Reform Programme and the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned and, if relevant, information from technical support received via the Technical Support Instrument.
Amendment 233 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission shall assess the importance and coherence of the recovery and resilience plan and its contribution to the green and digital transitions, and for that purpose, shall take into account the following criteria:
Amendment 237 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 239 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 259 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point e
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) whether the justification provided by the Member State on the amount of the estimated total costs of the recovery and resilience plan submitted is reasonable and plausible and is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment;
Amendment 262 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point f
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) whether the recovery and resilience plan contains measures for the implementation of countercyclical reforms and public investments projects that represent coherent actions;
Amendment 269 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall adopt a decision within four months of the official submission of the recovery and resilience plan by the Member State, by means of an implementing act. In the event that the Commission gives a positive assessment to a recovery and resilience plan, that decision shall set out the countercyclical reforms and investment projects to be implemented by the Member State, including the milestones and targets, and the financial contribution allocated in accordance with Article 11.
Amendment 272 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. In case the Member State concerned requests a loan support, the decision shall also set out the amount of the loan support as referred to in Article 12(4) and (5) and the additional countercyclical reforms and investment projects to be implemented by the Member State covered by that loan support, including the additional milestones and targets.
Amendment 277 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the description of the countercyclical reforms and of the investment projects and the amount of the estimated total cost of the recovery and resilience plan;
Amendment 278 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point c – point 2
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point c – point 2
Amendment 279 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
Amendment 283 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commission gives a negative assessment to a recovery and resilience plan, it shall communicate a duly justified assessment within fourthree months of the submission of the proposal by the Member State.
Amendment 284 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6
Article 17 – paragraph 6
6. The arrangements and timetable for implementation as referred to in point (d), the relevant indicators relating to the fulfilment of the envisaged milestones and targets referred to in point (e), the arrangements for providing access by the Commission to the underlying data referred to in point (f), and, where appropriate, the additional milestones and targets related to the disbursement of the loan support referred to in point (g) of paragraph 4 shall be further illustrated in an operational arrangement to be agreed by the Member State concerned and the Commission after the adoption of the decision referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 286 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission considers that the reasons put forward by the Member State concerned justify an amendment of the relevant recovery and resilience plan, the Commission shall assess the new plan in accordance with the provisions of Article 16 and shall take a new decision in accordance with Article 17 within fourthree months of the official submission of the request.
Amendment 287 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Amendment 290 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Upon completion of the relevant agreed milestones and targets indicated in the recovery and resilience plan as approved in the implementing act of the Commission, the Member State concerned shall submit to the Commission a duly justified request for payment of the financial contribution and, where relevant, of the loan tranche. Such requests for payment may be submitted by the Member States to the Commission on a biannual basis. The Commission shall assess, within two months of receiving the request, whether the relevant milestones and targets set out in the decision referred to in Article 17(1) have been satisfactorily implemented. For the purpose of the assessment, the operational arrangement referred to in Article 17(6) shall also be taken into account. The Commission may be assisted by experts.
Amendment 295 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
Article 19 – paragraph 6
Amendment 298 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
Article 19 – paragraph 7
Amendment 300 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
The Member State concerned shall report on a quarterly basis within the European Semester procesyearly basis on the progress made in the achievement of the recovery and resilience plans, including the operational arrangement referred to in Article 17(6). To that effect, the quarterly reports of the Member States shall be appropriately reflected in the National Reform Programmes, which shall be used as a tool for reporting on progress towards completion of the recovery and resilience plans.
Amendment 302 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall transmit the recovery and resilience plans as approved in the implementing act of the Commission in accordance with Article 17 to the European Parliament and the Council without undue delay. The Member State concerned may request the Commission to redact sensitive or confidential information, the disclosure of which would jeopardise public interests of the Member State.
Amendment 304 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Amendment 311 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
Article 24 – paragraph 4
Amendment 312 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The evaluation report shall, in particular, assess to which extent the objectives have been achieved, and the efficiency of the use of resources and the European added value. It shall also consider the continued relevance of all objectives and actions.
Amendment 315 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Amendment 317 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Amendment 318 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 2 – indent 1
Annex I – paragraph 2 – indent 1
— PopulationDemographic trend;
Amendment 324 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In accordance with Article 16(3), the Commission shall assess the importance and coherence of the recovery and resilience plans, and its contribution to the green and digital transitions, and for that purpose, it shall take into account the following criteria:
Amendment 326 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 328 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 338 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) whether the justification provided by the Member State on the amount of the estimated total costs of the recovery and resilience plan submitted is reasonable and plausible and is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment;
Amendment 340 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) whether the recovery and resilience plan contains measures for the implementation of countercyclical reforms and public investment projects that represent coherent actions;
Amendment 344 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – introductory part
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – introductory part
2.1 The recovery and resilience plan is expected to contribute to effectively address challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendations addressspecific reports prepared toby the Member State concerned or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester.
Amendment 346 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
— The recovery and resilience plan is expected to contribute to effectively address challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendations, including fiscal aspects, or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester addressed to the Member States concernedMember States' specific reports, including fiscal aspects,
Amendment 348 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 6
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 6
A – The recovery and resilience plan contributes to effectively address challenges identified in the CSRs, or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester,specific reports proposed by the Member State concerned and the plan represents an adequate response to the economic and social situation of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 349 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
B – The recovery and resilience plan contributes to partially address challenges identified in the CSRs, or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semesterspecific reports proposed by the Member State concerned and the plan represents a partially adequate response to the economic and social situation of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 350 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 8
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 8
C – The recovery and resilience plan does not contribute to address any challenges identified in the CSRs, or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semesterspecific reports proposed by the Member State concerned and the plan does not represent an adequate response to the economic and social situation of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 351 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.2
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.2
Amendment 384 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
— the recovery and resilience plan contains measures that aim at addressing weaknesses of the economy of the Member States and at boosting the growth potential of the economy of the Member State concerned, stimulating job creation and mitigating the adverse effects of the crisis, while avoiding adverse impacts of those measures on climate and environment.
Amendment 388 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – introductory part
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – introductory part
2.5 The justification provided by the Member State on the amount of the estimated total costs of the recovery and resilience plan is reasonable and plausible and is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment;
Amendment 389 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1
Amendment 390 #
2020/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 1
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point 2.5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 1
Amendment 189 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) With a view to protecting people in vulnerable situations, including those suffering from mental illnesses, non- communicable diseases and chronic diseases, the Programme should also promote actions which address the collateral impacts of the health crisis on people belonging to such vulnerable groups. With a view to guaranteeing continued high standards of essential healthcare services, the Programme should, especially in times of crisis and pandemics, encourage a transition to telemedicine, home administration of medication, and implementation of preventative and self-care plans, where possible and appropriate, while ensuring that access to healthcare services is provided to chronic patients, taking into account the respective levels of digitisation of the Member States and problems of access to digital solutions in remote areas or for certain population groups.
Amendment 197 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Correlations have been observed between health and/or economic crises and a worrying increase in depressive tendencies resulting from the effects of reduced disposable income, uncertainty about the future and growing unemployment. The Programme should therefore provide support for national actions aimed at integrating mental health into all policies and promoting mental health in all areas, including school and work, and for preventive actions to combat depression and suicide.
Amendment 241 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The Programme should provide for equal access to healthcare. ‘Socioeconomic health inequalities’ cover situations ranging from unequal access to treatment, fragmented access across regions and differences in health status based on economic conditions, to the distribution of health determinants between different population groups. The individual Member States are responsible for developing social and health polices to tackle the national challenges linked to health inequalities.
Amendment 255 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Non-communicable diseases are a result of a combination of genetic, physiological, environmental and behavioural factors. Such non- communicable diseases as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurological disorders, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes, represent major causes of disability, ill- health, health- related retirement, and premature death in the Union, resulting in considerable social and economic impacts. To decrease the impact of non- communicable diseases on individuals and society in the Union and reach goal 3 of the Sustainable Development Goals, Target 3.4, to reduce premature mortality from non- communicable diseases by one third by 2030, it is key to provide an integrated response focusing on prevention across sectors and policy fields, combined with efforts to strengthen health systems.
Amendment 299 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality in the Member States after cardiovascular diseases. It is also one of non-communicable diseases that share common risk factors and the prevention and control of which would benefit the majority of citizens. In 2020 the Commission announced the ‘Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan’ which would cover the entire cycle of the disease starting from prevention and early diagnosis to treatment and quality of life of patients and survivors. The measures should benefit from the Programme and from Horizon Europe’s Mission on Cancer. The actions on cancer should also address its common risk factors and synergies with other major non-communicable diseases, such as neurological diseases, and consider devising a template for other major disease areas based on the ‘Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan’.
Amendment 312 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Heart attacks and strokes often occur in people previously undiagnosed with cardiovascular diseases. Many of these are due to undetected genetic conditions, such as familial hypercholesterolaemia, arrhythmias, congenital heart disease and cardiomyopathies, and conditions such as hypertension. The Programme should support the development of policies and interventions to identify and manage individuals at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease in order to prevent the onset of the disease and reduce mortality.
Amendment 568 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6)support action for the surveillance, prevention, diagnosis and treatment and care of non-communicable diseases, and notably of cancer, while addressing its synergies with other major non- communicable diseases, such as neurological disorders;
Amendment 640 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall consult the health authorities of the Member States in the Steering Group on Health Promotion, Disease Prevention and Management of Non-Communicable Diseases on the work plans established for the Programme and its priorities and strategic orientations and its implementation. Consideration should be given to promoting synergies between European funds and national funds/resources to ensure long-term effectiveness and sustainability of the actions.
Amendment 666 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point a – point ii a (new)
Annex I – point a – point ii a (new)
(iia.) Local production of medicinal plants in the Member States;
Amendment 668 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point a – point ii b (new)
Annex I – point a – point ii b (new)
(iib.) Production of active ingredients and generics within the European Union to reduce the Member States’ dependence on certain third countries.
Amendment 740 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point d a (new)
Annex I – point d a (new)
(da.)Development of the capacity and resources of patients’ organisations to increase patients’ contribution to health policy planning and implementation.
Amendment 765 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point f – point v
Annex I – point f – point v
(v) Actions to address the collateral health consequences of a health crisis, in particular those on mental health, onin addition to social exclusion and financial hardship, often experienced by patients suffering from chronic diseases and other vulnerable groups;
Amendment 768 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point f – point v a (new)
Annex I – point f – point v a (new)
(va.) With patient safety as a top priority, actions to facilitate the availability of accessible and affordable telemedicine services for all patients throughout Europe, and to support digital literacy and a transition to telemedicine, home administration of treatment and medication, and implementation of preventative and self-care plans, while involving patients’ organisations in evaluating, identifying and implementing the best possible solutions in terms of continued access to high-quality care and treatment;
Amendment 809 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point g – point vi a (new)
Annex I – point g – point vi a (new)
(via.) Support actions promoting mental health in the workplace and in schools; promote actions to combat depression and suicide; develop socially inclusive forms of mental health care;
Amendment 819 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point g – point ix a (new)
Annex I – point g – point ix a (new)
(ixa.) Support the establishment and implementation of evidence-based programmes assisting Member States and their actions to improve health promotion, health literacy and disease prevention (for communicable and non-communicable diseases);
Amendment 910 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point h – point x a (new)
Annex I – point h – point x a (new)
(xa.) Support actions to tackle common, shared risk factors and synergies between cancer and other major non- communicable diseases, such as neurological disorders, and to render the European cancer plan a template for other major disease areas;
Amendment 918 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point h – point x b (new)
Annex I – point h – point x b (new)
(xb) Building on Europe’s cancer plan, support the creation of a template for other major disease areas, such as neurological disorders;
Amendment 944 #
2020/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point i – point iv a (new)
Annex I – point i – point iv a (new)
(iva) Foster a supportive environment for meaningful patient and public involvement in clinical trials, starting with the design phase and ending with dissemination;
Amendment 5 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Commission adopted a Communication on the European Green Deal on 11 December 20199 , drawing its roadmap towards an allegedly new growth policy for Europe and setting ambitious objectives to counter climate change and for environmental protection. In line with the objective to achieve climate neutrality in the Union by 2050 in an effective and fair manner, the European Green Deal announced a Just Transition Mechanism to provide means for facing the climate challengetransition towards a climate-neutral economy while leaving no one behind. The most vulnerable regions and people are the most exposed to the harmful effects of climate change and environmental degradation. At the same time, managing the transition requires significant structural changes. _________________ 9 COM(2019) 640 final.
Amendment 12 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The proposal for establishing the Just Transition Fund was adopted by the Commission on 14 January 202011 . For the better programming and implementation of the Fund, territorial just transition plans are to be adopted, setting out the key steps and timeline of the transition process and identifying the territories most negatively affected by the transition towards a climate neutral economy and with less capacity to deal with the transition challendamages. _________________ 11 COM(2020) 22 final
Amendment 20 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) A public sector loan facility (the ‘Facility’) should be provided. It constitutes the third pillar of the Just Transition Mechanism, supporting public sector entities in their investments. Such investments should meet the development needs resulting from the transition challendamages described in the territorial just transition plans as adopted by the Commission. The activities envisaged for support should be consistent with and complement those supported under the other two pillars of the Just Transition Mechanism.
Amendment 26 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impacted by the transition, the Facility should cover a wide range of investments, on condition that they contribute to meet the development needs in the transition towards a climate neutral economy, as described in the territorial just transition plans. The investments supported may cover energy and transport infrastructure, district heating networks, green mobility, smalocal public transport, waste management, clean energy and energy efficiency measures including renovations and conversions of buildings, support to transition to a circular economy, land restoration and decontamination, as well as up- and re- skilling, training and social infrastructure, including social housing. Infrastructure developments may also include solutions leading to their enhanced resilience to withstand disasters. Comprehensive investment approach should be favoured in particular for territories with important transition needs. Investments in other sectors could also be supported if they are consistent with the adopted territorial just transition plans. By supporting investments that do not generate sufficient revenues, the Facility aims at providing public sector entities with additional resources necessary to address the social, economic and environmental challendamages resulting from the adjustment to climathe transition. In order to help identify investments with a high positive environmental impact eligible under the Facility, the EU taxonomy on environmentally sustainable economic activities may be used towards a climate-neutral economy.
Amendment 45 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The objective of this Regulation, namely to leverage public investment in territories, most impacted by the transition towards climate neutrality by addressing the corresponding development needs, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone. The main reasons in this regard are the difficulties for public entities to support investments, which do not generate sufficient streams of own revenues and benefit the territories most negatively impacted by climathe transition, without EU grant support towards a climate-neutral economy, due to the Union's restrictive economic and budgetary policies and the need for a coherent implementation framework under direct management. Since those objectives can be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective,
Amendment 54 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
The Facility shall provide support benefitting Union territories facing serious social, environmental and economic challendamages deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy of the Union by 2050.
Amendment 63 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Facility is to address serious socio- economic challendamages deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy for the benefit of the Union territories identified in the territorial just transition plans prepared by the Member States in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation [JTF Regulation].
Amendment 84 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the projects achieve measurable impact in addressing serious social, economic or environmental challendamages deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy and benefit territories identified in a territorial just transition plan, even if they are not located in those territories;
Amendment 112 #
Amendment 113 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 6 – point 6.3
Annex II – point 6 – point 6.3
6.3 Public utilities (water, wastewater, district heating, energy, waste management, local transport)
Amendment 115 #
Amendment 116 #
2020/0100(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 7
Annex II – point 7
7. GPolluting and greenhouse gas emission reduced
Amendment 55 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) As a 24/7 operational centre at Union level with capacity to follow and support operations in various types of emergencies, within and outside the Union, in real-time, the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (‘ERCC’) should be further strengthened. This should include enhanced coordination of the ERCC with Member States’ national crisis systems and civil protection authorities, as well as with other relevant Union bodies. The work of the ERCC is supported by scientific expertise, including that provided by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
Amendment 56 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The ERCC should always act in coordination with national civil protection departments, the strategic importance of which has already been widely recognised. Indeed, national civil protection departments are an asset to be exploited, given that they are organised in a functional and efficient way, as already demonstrated during the COVID-19 emergency, and should be key partners in order to avoid wasting information and resources.
Amendment 68 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to increase flexibility as well as achieve optimal budget execution, indirect management should be included as a method of budget implementation only where justified by the nature and content of the action in question. In all other cases, direct management should always be the preferred option.
Amendment 73 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
Recital 25
Amendment 94 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
rescEU capacities shall be hosted by the Member States that acquire, rent, lease or otherwise contract those capacities. As a way to enhance Union resilience, rescEU capacities acquired, rented, leased or otherwise contracted by the Commission are to be strategically pre-positioned inside the Union. In consultation with Member States, rescEU capacities acquired, rented, leased or otherwise contracted by the Commission could also be located in third countries via trusted networks managed by relevant international organisations.’;
Amendment 106 #
2020/0097(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall implement the Union's financial support in accordance with the Financial Regulation in direct management or, in exceptional cases, in indirect management with bodies referred to in Article 62(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation. When choosing the implementation method for financial support, priority shall be given to direct management. Only where justified by the nature and content of the action concerned may the Commission use indirect management.
Amendment 55 #
Amendment 133 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Achieving climate neutrality should require a reasonable contribution from all economic sectors. In light, and be based ofn the importance of energy production and consumption on greenhouse gas emissions, the transition to a sustainable, affordable and secure energy system relying on a well- functioning internal energy market is essential‘polluter pays’ principle without undermining the security and affordability of the energy system. The digital transformation, technological innovation, and research and development are also important drivers for achieving the climate-neutrality objective.
Amendment 288 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The Commission, in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’, announced its intention to assess and make proposals for increasing the Union’s greenhouse gas emission reduction target for 2030 to ensureAnthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are inextricably linked to economic activity, as demonstrated by the fact that from the post-war period to the present there has been an almost continuous growth in global CO2 emissions, which was temporarily halted only by the onset of the 2007-2008 economic crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic its consistency with theexpected to trigger the sharpest economic downturn since the Great Depression. Achieving climate- neutrality objecwithin the tivme for 2050. In that Communicationrame set by the European Council will have a pro-cyclical effect, twhe Commission underlined that all Union policies should contribute to thereas it is of paramount importance to implement robust anti-cyclical policies. Therefore, the deadline for achieving climate- neutrality objective and that all sectors should play their part. By Septshould be put back until a date to be determined, but not before 2070. Moreover, by December 20201, the Commission should, based on a comprehensive impact assessment and taking into accountthat takes into account the medium- to long- term socio-economic consequences of the pandemic, as well as its analysis of the integrated national energy and climate plans submitted to the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council36, review the Union’s 2030 target for climate and explore options for a new 2030 target of 50 to 55 % emission reductions compared with 1990 levelsthat is lower than the current one. Where it considers necessary to amend the Union’s 2030 target, it should make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation as appropriate. In addition, the Commission should, by 30 June 2021, assess how the Union legislation implementing that target would need to be amended in order to achieve emission reductions of 50 to 55 % compared to 1990e relevant Union legislation as appropriate. _________________ 36Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 338 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) As cCitizens and communities have a powerful role to play in drivingare suffering the socio-economic effects of the transformation towards climate neutrality forward, strong public and social engagement on climate action should be facilitated. The Commission should therefore engage with all parts of society to enable and empower them to take action towards a climate-neutral and climate- resilient society, including through launching a European Climate Pact. The Commission should therefore engage with all parts of society by drawing on the multilevel climate and energy dialogues as set up by the Member States in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, including for the purposes of this Regulation.
Amendment 347 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to provide predictability and confidence for all economic actors, including businesses, workers, investors and consumers, to ensure that the transition towards climate neutrality is irreversible, to ensure gradual reduction over time and to assist in the assessment of the consistency of measures and progress with the climate-neutrality objective, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to set out a trajectory for achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the Union by 2050. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making37 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 37 37 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1to assist in the assessment of the consistency of measures and progress with the climate-neutrality objective, each Member State should, as part of its long- term strategy under Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, set out an indicative trajectory for achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the Union no earlier than 2070.
Amendment 379 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Amendment 403 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
This Regulation sets out an bindingcative objective of climate neutrality in the Union byno earlier than 20570 in pursuit of the long- term temperature goal set out in Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, and provides a framework for achieving progress in pursuit of the global adaptation goal established in Article 7 of the Paris Agreement.
Amendment 436 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. Union-wide emissions and removals of greenhouse gases regulated in Union law shall be balanced at the latest by 2050, thus reducing emissions to net zero by that date, no earlier than 2070.
Amendment 479 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. By Sept31 December 20201, the Commission shall review the Union’s 2030 target for climate referred to in Article 2(11) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 in light of the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1), and explore options for a new 2030 target of 50 to 55%socio-economic impact in the Union of the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the appropriateness of a new 2030 emissions reductions compared to 1990 target that is lower than the current one. Where the Commission considers that it is necessary to amend that target, it shall make legislative proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council as appropriate, in accordance with the Treaties.
Amendment 544 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9 to supplement this Regulation by setting out a trajectory at Union level to achieve the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) until 2040. At the latest within six months after each global stocktake referred to in Article 14 of the Paris Agreement, the Commission shall review the trajectoryEach Member State shall, as part of its long-term strategy under Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, set an indicative trajectory to achieve the objective set out in Article 2(1).
Amendment 565 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The trajectory shall start from the Union’s 2030 target for climate referred to in Article 2(3)11) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, as possibly amended pursuant to Article 2(3) of this Regulation.
Amendment 607 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
b) competiveness of the Union’s economy, with a focus on micro- enterprises and SMEs;
Amendment 625 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
c) best available technology and their availability on the market, with a view to increasing sales;
Amendment 680 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point g
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point g
g) all investment needs and opportunities;
Amendment 688 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point h
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point h
h) the need to ensure a just and socisocio- economically fair transition in each Member State, with a focus on unemployment rates, economic growth and real wage trends;
Amendment 693 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point i
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point i
Amendment 705 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j
j) the best available and most recent scientific evidence, includingand the latest reports of the IPCC, with the exception of the models based on the RCP8.5, or worst-case, scenario.
Amendment 714 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
(ja) the prevention of carbon and investment leakage, in particular in energy intensive industries most exposed to unfair global competition due to the offshoring of manufacturing activities to third countries with lower climate ambitions;
Amendment 731 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j b (new)
(jb) unlocking of investments in low- carbon solutions, in infrastructure improvement and R&I projects to safeguard competitiveness of EU economic activities and EU economy;
Amendment 737 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j c (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j c (new)
(jc) an assessment of the timely and adequate delivery of the necessary framework conditions to ensure long term investments and long term stability;
Amendment 787 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By 30 Septem1 October 20231, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall assess, together with the assessment foreseen under Article 29(5) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999:
Amendment 799 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
a) the collective progress made by all Member States towards the achievement of the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) as expressed by the trajectory referred to in Article 3(1);
Amendment 826 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By 30 Septem1 October 20231, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall review:
Amendment 832 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) the consistency of Union measures with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) as expressed by the trajectory referred to in Article 3(1);
Amendment 847 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Where, based on the assessment referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission finds that: a) Union measures are inconsistent with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1); or b) Union measures are inadequate to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4,; or thatc) the costs of Union measures outweigh the benefits; or d) the progress towards either the climate- neutrality objective or on adaptation as referred to in Article 4 is insufficient, it shall take the necessary measures in accordance with the Treaties, at the same time as the review of the trajectory referred to in Article 3(1). .
Amendment 858 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Amendment 882 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By 30 Septem1 October 20231, and every 5 years, thereafter the Commission shall assess:
Amendment 896 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
a) the consistency of national measures identified, on the basis of the National Energy and Climate Plans or the Biennial Progress Reports submitted in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, as relevant for the achievement of the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) with that objective as expressed by the corresponding trajectory referred to in Article 3(1);
Amendment 920 #
2020/0036(COD)
2. Where the Commission finds, under due consideration of the collective progress assessed in accordance with Article 5(1), that a Member State’s measures are inconsistent with that objective as expressed by the corresponding trajectory referred to in Article 3(1) or inadequate to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4, it may issue recommendations to that Member State in the context of the European Semester. The Commission shall make such recommendations publicly available.
Amendment 929 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Amendment 959 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
d) best availablend most recent scientific evidence, including available, and the latest reports of the IPCC, with the exception of the models based on the RCP8.5, or worst-case, scenario; e
Amendment 970 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 995 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The Commission shall also encourage Member States to first consult the public, by means of a referendum or similar legal instruments, in accordance with the provisions of their respective constitutions, on the proposed measures and time frames for achieving the climate-neutrality objective, in order to ensure maximum democratic scrutiny.
Amendment 1028 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Amendment 1067 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Each Member State shall establish a multilevel climate and energy dialogue pursuant to national rules, in which local authorities, civil society organisation, business communitysocial partners, investors and other relevant stakeholders and the general public are able actively to engage and discuss the achievement of the Union’s climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2 of Regulation …/… [Climate Law] and the different scenarios envisaged for energy and climate policies, including for the long term, and review progress, unless it already has a structure which serves the same purpose. Integrated national energy and climate plans may be discussed within the framework of such a dialogue.;
Amendment 1093 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
This Regulation, with the exception of the provisions in Article 2(3) and (4), shall apply from 1 January 2031.
Amendment 21 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The regulatory framework governing the Union’s cohesion policy for the period from 2021 to 2027, in the context of the next multi-annual financial framework, contributes to the fulfilment of the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by concentrating Union funding on green objectives. This Regulation implements one of the priorities set out in the Communication on the European Green Deal (‘the European Green Deal’)11 and is part of the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan12 providing dedicated financing under the Just Transition Mechanism in the context of cohesion policy to address the economic and social costs of the transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy, where any remaining greenhouse gas emissions are compensated by equivalent absorptions. _________________ 11 COM(2019) 640 final, 11.12.2019. 12 COM(2020) 21, 14.1.2020.
Amendment 26 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy constitutes one of the most important policy objectives for the Union. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. While fighting climate change and environmental degradation will benefit all in the long term and provides opportunities and challenges for all in the medium term,, in the medium term it will provide not only many uncertainties in terms of employment, but in all fields, especially farming, because not all regions and Member States start their transition from the same point or have the same capacity to respond. Some are more advanced than others, whereas the transition entails a wider social and economic impact for thosein particular those countries which have honoured their commitments and met the Kyoto Protocol targets (20% of energy from renewable sources by 2020), having made major investments, and which now have to contribute to the transition of countries and regions that rely heavily on fossil fuels - especially coal, lignite, peat and oil shale - or greenhouse gas intensive industries. Such a situation not only creates the risk of a variable speed transition in the Union as regards climate action, but also of growing disparities between regions and unfair competition from countries which have not yet tackled decarbonisation, detrimental to the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 40 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) As set out in the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, a Just Transition Mechanism should complement the other actions under the next multi-annual financial framework for the period from 2021 to 2027. It should contribute to addressing the social and economic consequences of transitioning towards Union climate neutrality by bringing together the Union budget’s spending on climate and social objectives at regional level.
Amendment 47 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In view of the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the commitment regarding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the increased ambition of the Union as proposed in the European Green Deal, the JTF should provide a key contribution to mainstream climate actions. Resources from the JTF own envelope are additional and come on top of the investments needed to achieve the overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditure contributing to climate objectives. Resources transferred from the ERDF and ESF+ will contribute fully to the achievement of this targetThe JTF, together with the resources transferred from the ERDF and ESF+, should make a substantial contribution towards the vital measures to counter the sharp and sudden deflation the European Union will have to face as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on the most severely affected economic sectors and regions.
Amendment 67 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Transitioning to a climate-neutral economy is a challenge for all Member States. It will be particularly demanding for those Member States that rely heavily on fossil fuels or greenhouse gas intensive industrial activities which need to be phased out or which need to adapt due to the transition towards climate neutrality and that lack the financial means to do so. The JTF should therefore cover all Member States, but the distribution of its financial means should reflect the capacity offact that Member States to finance the necessary investments to cope with the transition towards climate neutralitywhich achieved the Kyoto targets by getting into debt should be rewarded.
Amendment 76 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation identifies types of investments for which expenditure may be supported by the JTF. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental priorities of the Union. The list of investments should include those that support local economies and are sustainable in the long- term, taking into account all the objectives of the Green Deal. The projects financed should contribute to a transition to a climate- neutral and circular economy. For declining sectors, such as energy production based on coal, lignite, peat and oil shale or extraction activities for these solid fossil fuels, support should be linked to the phasing out of the activity and the corresponding reduction in the employment level. As regards transforming sectors with high greenhouse gas emission levels, support should promote new activities through the deployment of new technologies, new processes or products, leading to significant emission reduction, in line with the EU 2030 climate objectives and EU climate neutrality by 205013 while maintaining and enhancing employment and avoiding environmental degradation. Particular attention should also be given to activities enhancing innovation and research in advanced and sustainable technologies, as well as in the fields of digitalisation and connectivity, provided that such measures help mitigate the negative side effects of a transition towards, and contribute to, a climate- neutral and circular economy. _________________ 13 As set out in “A Clean Planet for all European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy”, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank - COM(2018) 773 final.
Amendment 91 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impactnvolved byin the transition, the JTF should provide support to productive investment in SMEs. Productive investment should be understood as investment in fixed capital or immaterial assets of enterprises in view of producing goods and services thereby contributing to gross-capital formation and employment. For enterprises other than SMEs, productive investments should only be supported if they are necessary for mitigating job losses resulting from the transition, by creating or protecting a significant number oft least 499 jobs and they do not lead to or result from relocation. Investments in existing industrial facilities, including those covered by the Union Emissions Trading System, should be allowed if they contribute to the transition to a climate- neutral economy by 2050 and go substantially below the relevant benchmarks established for free allocation under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 and if they result in the protection of a significant number of jobs. Any such investment should be justified accordingly in the relevant territorial just transition plan. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market and cohesion policy, support to undertakings should comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU and, in particular, support to productive investments by enterprises other than SMEs should be limited to enterprises located in areas designated as assisted areas for the purposes of points (a) and (c) of Article 107(3) TFEU. _________________ 14Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 104 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The JTF support should be conditional on the effective implementation of a transition process in a specific territory in order to achieve a climate-neutral economy. In that regard, Member States should prepare, in cooperation with the relevant stakeholders and supported by the Commission, territorial just transition plans, detailing the transition process, consistently with their National Energy and Climate Plans. To this end, the Commission should set up a Just Transition Platform, which would build on the existing platform for coal regions in transition to enable bilateral and multilateral exchanges of experience on lessons learnt and best practices across all affected sectors.
Amendment 106 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The territorial just transition plans should identify the territories most negatively affected, where JTF support should be concentrated and describe specific actions to be undertaken to reach a climate-neutral economy, notably as regards the conversion or closure of facilities involving fossil fuel production or other greenhouse gas intensive activities. Those territories should be precisely defined and correspond to NUTS level 32 regions or should be parts thereof. The plans should detail the challenges and needs of those territories and identify the type of operations needed in a manner that ensures the coherent development of climate-resilient economic activities that are also consistent with the transition to climate-neutrality and the objectives of the Green Deal. Only investments in accordance with the territorial transition plans should receive financial support from the JTF. The territorial just transition plans should be part of the programmes (supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund or the JTF, as the case may be) which are approved by the Commission.
Amendment 116 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) Special attention and support should be given to rural, remote and extremely remote areas. Those areas are already facing even greater social and economic difficulties, including rural-to- urban migration and overall depopulation, fewer skills, little digital infrastructure and low connectivity, which further reduces their ability to address the challenges of the transition process. These areas could also play an important role as regards the ability to attract investments in renewable energy, while preserving farmland.
Amendment 118 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The objectives of this Regulation, namely to support territories facing economic and social transformation in their transition to a climate-neutral economy, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone. The main reasons in this regard are, on the one hand, the disparities between the levels of development of the various territories and the backwardness of the least favoured territories, as well as the limit on the financial resources of the Member States and territories and, on the other hand, the need for a coherent implementation framework covering several Union funds under shared management. Since those objectives can better be achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,
Amendment 122 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Just Transition Fund (‘JTF’) to provide support to territories facing serious socio- economic challenges deriving from the transition processmoving towards a climate- neutral economy of the Union by 2050.
Amendment 130 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The resources for the JTF under the Investment for jobs and growth goal available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 7.5 billion in 2018 prices, which may be increased, as the case may be, by additional resources allocated in the Union budget, and by other resources in accordance with the applicable basic act. The funding of the JTF shall not adversely affect the allocation of other funds provided for by the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), including those for the CAP and Horizon Europe.
Amendment 139 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from Article [21a] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], any additional resources referred to in paragraph 2, allocated to the JTF in the Union budget or provided by other resources shall not require complementary support from the ERDF or the ESF+ or any other fund allocation programmes provided for by the European Union.
Amendment 169 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) investments in digitalisation and digital connectivity, in particular for the roll-out of broadband in rural, isolated and extremely remote areas;
Amendment 223 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 231 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) investment related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels, with the exception of natural gas companies;
Amendment 240 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall only approve a programme where the identification of the territories most negatively affectinvolved byin the transition process, contained within the relevant territorial just transition plan, is duly justified and the relevant territorial just transition plan is consistent with the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 244 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare, together with the relevant authorities of the territories concerned, one or more territorial just transition plans covering one or more affected territories corresponding to level 32 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics (‘NUTS level 32 regions’) as established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as amended by Commission Regulation (ECU) No 868/201417 or parts thereof, in accordance with the template set out in Annex II. Those territories shall be those most negatively affected based on the economic and social impacts resulting from the transition, in particular with regard to expected job losses in fossil fuel production and use and the transformation needs of the production processes of industrial facilities with the highest greenhouse gas intensity. _________________ 17 Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154 21.6.2003, p. 1).
Amendment 256 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a justification for identifying the territories as the most negatively affectinvolved byin the transition process referred to in point (a) and to be supported by the JTF, in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 261 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an assessment of the transition challenges faced by the most negatively affectinvolved territories, including the social, economic, and environmental impact of the transition to a climate-neutral economy, identifying the potential number of affected jobs and job losses, the development needs and objectives, to be reached by 2030 linked to the transformation or closure of greenhouse gas-intensive activities in those territories;
Amendment 269 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Where the Commission concludes, based on the examination of the final performance report of the programme, that there is a highlights the failure to achieve at least 65% of the target established for one or more output or result indicators for the JTF resources, itthe full target established, the Commission may make financial corrections pursuant to Article [98] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] by reducing the support from the JTF to the priority concerned in proportion to the achievements. The target established for one or more output or result indicators for the JTF resources may not be less than an average of 80%.
Amendment 272 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The mid-term review exercise as referred to in Article 7(4) shall assess the progress made towards the zero-emissions target for 2050 and the milestone for 2030. Should it be ascertained that progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions has been insufficient, JTF support shall be withdrawn.
Amendment 32 #
2019/2814(RSP)
Recital E
E. whereas pet passports are often counterfeited with veterinarians possibly also involved in this illegal practice;
Amendment 51 #
2019/2814(RSP)
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the identification and registration of cats and dogs is a crucial and necessary first step in the fight against illegal trade, and that registration and identification are key conditions for control, enforcement, and traceability; , requiring owners to notify the authorities of every litter using an online data sheet, giving details of the breeder and of the animals born, indicating their breed, sex and microchip number, before their release or sale;
Amendment 65 #
2019/2814(RSP)
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that the European Commission involve in the Action Plan its different Directorate-Generals working on animal welfare, public health, consumer protection, internal market, and trafficking issues, as well as the breeders’ associations;
Amendment 89 #
2019/2814(RSP)
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that Member States should be encouraged to set up a compulsory register of authorised companion animal breeders and sellers;
Amendment 29 #
2019/0070(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
Amendment 50 #
2019/0070(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
(aa) paragraph 3 is amended as follows: ‘3. The financial allocation referred to in paragraph 1 may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, which are required for the management of the Union Mechanism and the achievement of its objectives. If such resources are under indirect management, where that is permitted under the laws of the Member States, their management will have to be subject to impact assessment.’ Such expenditure may, in particular, cover studies, meetings of experts, information and communication actions, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, as far as they are related to the general objectives of the Union Mechanism, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information processing and exchange, including their interconnection with existing or future systems designed to promote cross-sectoral data exchange and related equipment, together with all other technical and administrative assistance expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the programme.