BETA

Activities of Vlad GHEORGHE

Plenary speeches (69)

Preparation of an EU Strategy on COVID-19 vaccination, including its external dimension (debate)
2020/12/16
European Arrest Warrant and surrender procedures between Member States (debate)
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2019/2207(INI)
InvestEU programme (debate)
2021/03/09
Dossiers: 2020/0108(COD)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 25 and 26 March 2021 – Digital Green Certificate (debate)
2021/03/24
Implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (continuation of debate)
2021/03/24
Dossiers: 2020/2091(INI)
Assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia and the rule of law in Malta (debate)
2021/03/25
Justice programme 2021-2027 (continuation of debate)
2021/04/27
Dossiers: 2018/0208(COD)
Saving the summer tourism season - EU support to the hospitality sector (debate)
2021/04/27
Just Transition Fund (debate)
2021/05/17
Dossiers: 2020/0006(COD)
Erasmus+: the Union Programme for education and training, youth and sport (debate)
2021/05/18
Environment: The Aarhus Regulation (debate)
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2020/0289(COD)
Parliament's right of inquiry (debate)
2021/06/08
Dossiers: 2021/2632(RSP)
Decent working and employment conditions in the aviation sector - Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on aviation (debate)
2021/07/08
Dossiers: 2021/2666(RSP)
Natural disasters during the summer 2021 - Impacts of natural disasters in Europe due to climate change (debate)
2021/09/14
Dossiers: 2021/2867(RSP)
Reversing the negative social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (debate)
2021/09/15
Dossiers: 2021/2734(RSP)
United States sanctions and the Rule of law (continuation of debate)
2021/09/16
Dossiers: 2021/2868(RSP)
EU transparency in the development, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines (debate)
2021/09/16
Dossiers: 2021/2678(RSP)
Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance (debate)
2021/10/06
Insurance of motor vehicles (debate)
2021/10/21
Dossiers: 2018/0168(COD)
Strengthening democracy, media freedom and pluralism in the EU (A9-0292/2021 - Tiemo Wölken, Roberta Metsola)
2021/11/11
Dossiers: 2021/2036(INI)
International ports’ congestions and increased transport costs affecting the EU (debate)
2021/11/25
An EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses (debate)
2021/12/16
Forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
2021/12/16
Dossiers: 2021/3020(RSP)
Situation in Kazakhstan
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2505(RSP)
Protection of workers from the risks relating to exposure to carcinogens, mutagens and reprotoxins at work (continuation of debate)
2022/02/17
Dossiers: 2020/0262(COD)
The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector (G-001004/2021 - B9-0005/2022)
2022/02/17
Guidelines for the 2023 budget – Section III (debate)
2022/04/05
Dossiers: 2021/2226(BUI)
EU preparedness against cyber-attacks following Russia invasion on Ukraine (debate)
2022/05/03
State of play of the EU-Moldova cooperation (RC-B9-0240/2022, B9-0240/2022, B9-0241/2022, B9-0242/2022, B9-0243/2022, B9-0244/2022, B9-0245/2022)
2022/05/05
Dossiers: 2022/2651(RSP)
Prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus (debate)
2022/05/18
Dossiers: 2022/2664(RSP)
EU Association Agreement with the Republic of Moldova (A9-0143/2022 - Dragoş Tudorache)
2022/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2237(INI)
The fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine (B9-0272/2022, RC-B9-0281/2022, B9-0281/2022, B9-0282/2022, B9-0283/2022, B9-0284/2022, B9-0285/2022)
2022/05/19
Dossiers: 2022/2655(RSP)
Illegal logging in the EU (debate)
2022/06/09
Dossiers: 2022/2523(RSP)
The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) (B9-0316/2022, RC-B9-0317/2022, B9-0317/2022, B9-0320/2022, B9-0321/2022, B9-0322/2022, B9-0323/2022)
2022/06/09
Dossiers: 2022/2703(RSP)
Parliament’s right of initiative (A9-0142/2022 - Paulo Rangel)
2022/06/09
Dossiers: 2020/2132(INI)
Candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia (RC-B9-0331/2022, B9-0331/2022, B9-0332/2022, B9-0333/2022, B9-0334/2022, B9-0335/2022, B9-0336/2022)
2022/06/23
Dossiers: 2022/2716(RSP)
Illegal logging in the EU (B9-0329/2022)
2022/06/23
Dossiers: 2022/2523(RSP)
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2021 - Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2020 (debate)
2022/07/06
Dossiers: 2021/2203(INI)
Developing an EU Cycling Strategy (debate)
2022/07/07
Dossiers: 2022/2726(RSP)
Protection of the EU’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2020 (A9-0175/2022 - Katalin Cseh)
2022/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2234(INI)
Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate)
2022/09/14
Dossiers: 2018/0902R(NLE)
Economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report (A9-0210/2022 - Constanze Krehl)
2022/09/15
Dossiers: 2022/2032(INI)
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 - all sections (debate)
2022/10/18
Dossiers: 2022/0212(BUD)
The Rule of Law in Malta, five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia (B9-0470/2022, B9-0471/2022)
2022/10/20
Dossiers: 2022/2866(RSP)
Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Croatia (A9-0264/2022 - Paulo Rangel)
2022/11/10
Dossiers: 2022/0806(NLE)
Amending Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 - Amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing method - 'Macro-Financial Assistance+' instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (debate)
2022/11/23
The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession (debate)
2022/12/13
The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession (debate)
2022/12/13
Establishment of an independent EU Ethics Body (debate)
2023/02/14
Situation in Georgia (debate)
2023/03/14
The challenges facing the Republic of Moldova (debate)
2023/03/14
Combating organised crime in the EU (debate)
2023/03/15
European Citizens’ Initiative "Save bees and farmers! Towards a bee-friendly agriculture for a healthy environment" (debate)
2023/03/16
2022 Rule of Law Report - The rule of law situation in the European Union (B9-0189/2023, B9-0190/2023, B9-0191/2023)
2023/03/30
Dossiers: 2022/2898(RSP)
Guidelines for the 2024 budget - Section III (debate)
2023/04/18
Dossiers: 2022/2184(BUI)
Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (A9-0081/2022 - Ernest Urtasun, Assita Kanko)
2023/04/20
Dossiers: 2021/0241(COD)
Update of the anti-corruption legislative framework (debate)
2023/05/10
Extension of the mandate of the EPPO with regard to the criminal offence of violation of Union restrictive measures (debate)
2023/06/14
Dossiers: 2023/2671(RSP)
Accession to the Schengen area (short presentation)
2023/07/11
Dossiers: 2023/2668(RSP)
Reviewing the protection status of wolves and other large carnivores in the EU (topical debate)
2023/09/13
Corrupt large-scale sale of Schengen visas (debate)
2023/10/03
Poor sanitary conditions, low levels of security and lack of parking places in rest areas for truck drivers (debate)
2023/10/05
Taking stock of Moldova's path to the EU (B9-0407/2023, RC-B9-0408/2023, B9-0408/2023, B9-0410/2023, B9-0411/2023, B9-0417/2023, B9-0420/2023)
2023/10/05
Dossiers: 2023/2838(RSP)
Establishing the Ukraine Facility (debate)
2023/10/16
Dossiers: 2023/0200(COD)
Schengen area: digitalisation of the visa procedure - Schengen area: amending the Visa Sticker Regulation (Joint debate – Schengen area)
2023/10/17
Dossiers: 2022/0132A(COD)
Presentation of the Court of Auditors' annual report 2022 (debate)
2023/10/18
2024 budgetary procedure: Joint text (debate)
2023/11/21
Dossiers: 2023/0264(BUD)
International day for the elimination of violence against women (debate)
2023/11/23
Young researchers (debate)
2023/11/23
Dossiers: 2023/2884(RSP)

Shadow reports (12)

REPORT on the implementation report on the road safety aspects of the Roadworthiness Package
2021/03/02
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2019/2205(INI)
Documents: PDF(214 KB) DOC(68 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Benoît LUTGEN', 'mepid': 197458}]
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund following an application from Estonia – EGF/2020/002 EE/Estonia Tourism
2021/05/11
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2021/0076(BUD)
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(61 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'José Manuel FERNANDES', 'mepid': 96899}]
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency
2021/05/11
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2021/0077(BUD)
Documents: PDF(224 KB) DOC(64 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL', 'mepid': 96991}]
RECOMMENDATION on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2003/76/EC establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel
2021/07/02
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2020/0142(APP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(53 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Johan VAN OVERTVELDT', 'mepid': 125106}]
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2003/77/EC laying down multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the ECSC in liquidation and, on completion of the liquidation, the Assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel
2021/07/02
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2020/0143(NLE)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(51 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Johan VAN OVERTVELDT', 'mepid': 125106}]
REPORT Implementation report on the EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey
2021/07/26
Committee: AFETBUDGDEVE
Dossiers: 2020/2045(INI)
Documents: PDF(284 KB) DOC(118 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Janusz LEWANDOWSKI', 'mepid': 23781}, {'name': 'Milan ZVER', 'mepid': 96933}, {'name': 'György HÖLVÉNYI', 'mepid': 124715}]
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Greece – EGF/2021/008 EL/Attica electrical equipment manufacturing
2022/06/21
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/0170(BUD)
Documents: PDF(206 KB) DOC(75 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Bogdan RZOŃCA', 'mepid': 197545}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road
2022/10/27
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2022/0200(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(50 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marian-Jean MARINESCU', 'mepid': 33982}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Moldova on the carriage of freight by road
2022/10/27
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2022/0201(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(50 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marian-Jean MARINESCU', 'mepid': 33982}]
REPORT on the new EU urban mobility framework
2023/04/03
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2022/2023(INI)
Documents: PDF(249 KB) DOC(105 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andrey NOVAKOV', 'mepid': 107212}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Ukraine Facility
2023/10/10
Committee: AFETBUDG
Dossiers: 2023/0200(COD)
Documents: PDF(385 KB) DOC(138 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Michael GAHLER', 'mepid': 2341}, {'name': 'Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL', 'mepid': 96991}]
REPORT on the outcome of the Committee on Petitions’ deliberations during 2022
2023/11/06
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2023/2047(INI)
Documents: PDF(259 KB) DOC(100 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Alex AGIUS SALIBA', 'mepid': 197403}]

Opinions (7)

OPINION on the challenges for urban areas in the post-COVID-19 era
2021/11/16
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2021/2075(INI)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(75 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION Guidelines for the 2023 Budget – Section III
2022/02/08
Committee: TRAN
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(74 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION on Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius on an extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius
2022/06/30
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/0014(NLE)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(48 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION on the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 – all sections
2022/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2022/0212(BUD)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(70 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directive 2008/99/EC
2022/12/09
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2021/0422(COD)
Documents: PDF(295 KB) DOC(217 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Asset recovery and confiscation
2023/04/03
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/0167(COD)
Documents: PDF(248 KB) DOC(145 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Definition of criminal offences and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures
2023/06/12
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/0398(COD)
Documents: PDF(203 KB) DOC(132 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad GHEORGHE', 'mepid': 209140}]

Shadow opinions (9)

OPINION on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 2021
2021/02/04
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2020/2244(INI)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(70 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Nils UŠAKOVS', 'mepid': 197810}]
OPINION on the implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directives: Directive 2004/107/EC and Directive 2008/50/EC
2021/02/26
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2020/2091(INI)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(74 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Carlo FIDANZA', 'mepid': 96810}]
OPINION on Guidelines for the 2022 Budget - Section III
2021/02/26
Committee: TRAN
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(73 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ', 'mepid': 197742}]
OPINION on the Commission’s 2020 Rule of law report - COM(2020)0580
2021/05/27
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2021/2025(INI)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(71 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Margrete AUKEN', 'mepid': 28161}]
OPINION on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union on the one hand, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, on the other hand and the Implementation Protocol thereto
2021/06/01
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2021/0037(NLE)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(50 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Elisabetta GUALMINI', 'mepid': 197618}]
OPINION on the protection of the rights of the child in civil, administrative and family law proceedings
2022/01/31
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2021/2060(INI)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(72 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Tatjana ŽDANOKA', 'mepid': 28619}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (recast)
2022/05/17
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2021/0375(COD)
Documents: PDF(234 KB) DOC(180 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Nils UŠAKOVS', 'mepid': 197810}]
OPINION on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report
2022/06/23
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/2032(INI)
Documents: PDF(123 KB) DOC(45 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Karlo RESSLER', 'mepid': 197413}]
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision (EU) 2022/563 as regards the amount of macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova
2023/04/18
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2023/0018(COD)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(48 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Siegfried MUREŞAN', 'mepid': 124802}]

Institutional motions (140)

JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of Aleksei Navalny
2021/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2513(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy and Le Huu Minh Tuan
2021/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong
2021/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights situation in Kazakhstan
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2544(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Uganda
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2545(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian and political situation in Yemen
2021/02/09
Dossiers: 2021/2539(RSP)
Documents: PDF(182 KB) DOC(60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Myanmar
2021/02/09
Dossiers: 2021/2540(RSP)
Documents: PDF(211 KB) DOC(61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2544(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Uganda
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2545(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the blasphemy laws in Pakistan, in particular the case of Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2647(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bolivia and the arrest of former President Jeanine Añez and other officials
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2646(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, the case of Alexei Navalny, the military build-up on Ukraine’s border and Russian attacks in the Czech Republic
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2642(RSP)
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the fifth anniversary of the Peace Agreement in Colombia
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2643(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs
2021/05/18
Dossiers: 2021/2644(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chad
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2695(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Haiti
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2694(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on prisoners of war in the aftermath of the most recent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2693(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2748(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The listing of German NGOs as 'undesirable organisations' by Russia and the detention of Andrei Pivovarov
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2749(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights and political situation in Cuba
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2745(RSP)
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2741(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2712(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2748(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the breach of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the use of minors by the Moroccan authorities in the migratory crisis in Ceuta
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2747(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the listing of German NGOs as ‘undesirable organisations’ by Russia and the detention of Andrei Pivovarov
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2749(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights and political situation in Cuba
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2745(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following the abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2741(RSP)
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2712(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem Al Darwish and Abdullah Al Howaiti
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2787(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2786(RSP)
Documents: PDF(175 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2785(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP)
2021/07/06
Dossiers: 2021/2788(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
2021/07/06
Dossiers: 2021/2777(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP)
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2788(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2777(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2787(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2786(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2785(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations by private military and security companies, particularly the Wagner group
2021/11/22
Dossiers: 2021/2982(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights violations by private military and security companies, particularly the Wagner Group
2021/11/24
Dossiers: 2021/2982(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuous crackdown on civil society and human rights defenders in Russia: the case of Human Rights organisation Memorial
2021/12/13
Dossiers: 2021/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
2021/12/13
Dossiers: 2021/3020(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown on civil society and human rights defenders in Russia: the case of human rights organisation Memorial
2021/12/15
Dossiers: 2021/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
2021/12/15
Dossiers: 2021/3020(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2504(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kazakhstan
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2504(RSP)
Documents: PDF(219 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kazakhstan
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2580(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, one year after the coup
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2581(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(46 KB)
on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2580(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(53 KB)
Myanmar, one year after the coup
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2581(RSP)
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On Human rights situation in North Korea, including the persecution of religious minorities
2022/04/04
Dossiers: 2022/2620(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the rule of law and human rights in the Republic of Guatemala
2022/04/04
Dossiers: 2022/2621(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the increasing repression in Russia, including the case of Alexey Navalny
2022/04/04
Dossiers: 2022/2622(RSP)
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the EU Protection of children and young people fleeing because of the war in Ukraine
2022/04/05
Dossiers: 2022/2618(RSP)
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2022: including the latest developments of the war against Ukraine and the EU sanctions against Russia and their implementation
2022/04/05
Dossiers: 2022/2560(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2022, including the latest developments of the war against Ukraine and the EU sanctions against Russia and their implementation
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2560(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in North Korea, including the persecution of religious minorities
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2620(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
the situation of the rule of law and human rights in the Republic of Guatemala
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2621(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(52 KB)
on the Increasing repression in Russia, including the case of Alexey Navalny
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2622(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reports of continued organ harvesting in China
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the state of play of EU-Moldova cooperation
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2651(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2658(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the reports of continued organ harvesting in China
2022/05/04
Dossiers: 2022/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
2022/05/04
Dossiers: 2022/2658(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the fight against impunity of war crimes in Ukraine
2022/05/13
Dossiers: 2022/2655(RSP)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus
2022/05/13
Dossiers: 2022/2664(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine
2022/05/17
Dossiers: 2022/2655(RSP)
Documents: PDF(183 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus
2022/05/17
Dossiers: 2022/2664(RSP)
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia
2022/06/20
Dossiers: 2022/2716(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia
2022/06/22
Dossiers: 2022/2716(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Strait of Taiwan
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/2822(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights in Uganda and Tanzania linked to investments in fossil fuels projects
2022/09/14
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations in the context of the forced deportation of Ukrainian civilians to and the forced adoption of Ukrainian children in Russia
2022/09/14
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nicaragua, in particular the arrest of the bishop Rolando Álvarez
2022/09/14
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the Schengen area
2022/10/12
Dossiers: 2022/2852(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recognising the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism
2022/11/16
Dossiers: 2022/2896(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recognising the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism
2022/11/21
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Egypt
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2962(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan and specially the deterioration of women's rights and attacks against education institutions
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2955(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuing repression of the democratic opposition and civil society in Belarus
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2956(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights in the context of the FIFA world cup in Qatar
2022/11/22
Dossiers: 2022/2948(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights in the context of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuing repression of the democratic opposition and civil society in Belarus
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the forced displacement of people as a result of the escalating conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the deterioration of women’s rights and attacks against educational institutions
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Egypt
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Military junta crackdown on peaceful demonstrations in Chad
2022/12/12
Dossiers: 2022/2993(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Chinese government crackdown on the peaceful protests across the People's Republic of China
2022/12/12
Dossiers: 2022/2992(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of human rights defender Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja in Bahrain
2022/12/12
Dossiers: 2022/2994(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on 90 years after the Holodomor: recognising the mass killing through starvation as genocide
2022/12/12
Dossiers: 2022/3001(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on 90 years after the Holodomor: recognising the mass killing through starvation as genocide
2022/12/13
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian consequences of the blockade in Nagorno-Karabakh
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2504(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the establishment of a tribunal on the crime of aggression against Ukraine
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2022/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU response to the protests and executions in Iran
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2511(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The situation of journalists in Morocco, notably the case of Omar Radi
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2506(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the storming of Brazilian democratic institutions
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian consequences of the blockade in Nagorno-Karabakh
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU response to the protests and executions in Iran
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(181 KB) DOC(61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the establishment of a tribunal on the crime of aggression against Ukraine
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the storming of the Brazilian democratic institutions
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists in Morocco, notably the case of Omar Radi
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the preparation of the EU-Ukraine Summit
2023/01/25
Dossiers: 2023/2509(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the preparation of the EU-Ukraine Summit
2023/01/30
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the former President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili
2023/02/08
Dossiers: 2023/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the former President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili
2023/02/13
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the recent deterioration of the inhuman imprisonment conditions of Alexei Navalny and other political prisoners in Russia
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2553(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on one year of Russia’s invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2558(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the inhuman imprisonment conditions of Alexei Navalny
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(46 KB)
on one year of Russia’s invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on one year of Russia’s invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tunisia: Recent attacks against freedom of expression and association and trade unions, in particular the case of journalist Noureddine Boutar
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2588(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: the case of opposition leader Kem Sokha
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2589(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent poisoning of hundreds of school girls in Iran
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2587(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks in Tunisia against freedom of expression and association, and against trade unions, in particular the case of journalist Noureddine Boutar
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the poisoning of hundreds of schoolgirls
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: the case of opposition leader Kem Sokha
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the challenges facing the Republic of Moldova
2023/04/12
Dossiers: 2023/2595(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the challenges facing the Republic of Moldova
2023/04/17
Documents: PDF(181 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on repression in Russia, in particular the cases of Vladimir Kara-Murza and Alexei Navalny
2023/04/18
Dossiers: 2023/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on repression in Russia, in particular the cases of Vladimir Kara-Murza and Aleksei Navalny
2023/04/19
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Belarus: the inhumane treatment and hospitalisation of prominent opposition leader Viktar Babaryka
2023/05/10
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION torture and criminal prosecution of Ukrainian minors Tihran Ohannisian and Mykyta Khanhanov by the Russian Federation
2023/06/12
Dossiers: 2023/2735(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Zarema Musaeva in Chechnya
2023/10/02
Dossiers: 2023/2882(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on taking stock of Moldova’s path to the EU
2023/10/02
Dossiers: 2023/2838(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh after Azerbaijan’s attack and the continuing threats against Armenia
2023/10/02
Dossiers: 2023/2879(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Zarema Musaeva in Chechnya
2023/10/04
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on taking stock of Moldova’s path to the EU
2023/10/04
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh after Azerbaijan’s attack and the continuing threats against Armenia
2023/10/04
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the effectiveness of the EU sanctions on Russia
2023/11/06
Dossiers: 2023/2905(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the effectiveness of the EU sanctions on Russia
2023/11/08
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on 30 years of Copenhagen criteria - giving further impetus to EU enlargement policy
2023/12/08
Dossiers: 2023/2987(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)

Oral questions (7)

Logistical and transport challenges ahead of COVID-19 vaccine distribution
2020/12/09
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
An EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses
2021/10/11
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Enforcement of revolving door rules by the Commission
2021/10/15
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Call for a European strategy to counter hostage diplomacy
2023/02/27
Documents: PDF(54 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Restitution of plundered property to Holocaust victims and Jewish communities
2023/03/06
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Poor sanitary conditions, low levels of security and lack of parking places in rest areas for truck drivers
2023/06/07
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Medicine shortages and strategic healthcare autonomy in the EU
2023/09/05
Documents: PDF(54 KB) DOC(12 KB)

Written explanations (10)

LGBTIQ rights in the EU (B9-0431/2021)

Freedom of movement and rights of individuals, couples and families are a cornerstone of European Union. Thus, when travelling through the EU space, rights of EU citizens granted by their Member State should be recognised in all Member States.I strongly believe that we should be all equal before the law, authorities and institutions. I also believe sensitive topics should be strategically handled so that extremist parties can’t spread fear and misinformation, radicalising citizens.Fuelling extremist rise to power doesn’t help any citizen. On the contrary, it enables them to push for even more severe restrictions of rights.Being serious about achieving these goals requires choosing strategic wording. Considering all sensitivities when solving these problems helps everyone and protects our societies from extremist takeover.Inflammatory headlines might help EU politicians to mark points with their electors, but it loses the fight at home when trying to change legislation, providing oxygen to extremist rhetoric.I believe we need change. But I think there are better solutions for achieving this goal having in mind the long-term best interest of citizens and their day-to-day quality of life. This is why I abstained to vote.
2021/09/13
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (A9-0253/2021 - Joanna Kopcińska)

. ‒ The COVID-19 pandemic proved and exposed the strengths and the weaknesses of the EU community. We need to improve health safety and security, reacting faster and more efficiently.We have the responsibility to build a stronger Union through the health system, delivering better conditions for EU citizens. The next medical crisis should find the Union fully prepared and equipped with data, resources and action plans.Achieving sustainable, innovative and resilient health systems within the EU requires strong cooperation. We need common prevention and response plans against future health threats and stronger capacities for integrated rapid responses.Proper transparency and accountability are mandatory to establish credibility and trust. We need to be practical. We need to focus on results. We need a structured Union-level approach when facing a cross-border public health crisis.The goal is to create synergy between European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the Commission and the Member States in order to achieve the best possible result for EU citizens.Supporting a stronger ECDC mandate is a necessity to ensure better health security framework and better health emergency response. That is why I voted in favour of this report.
2021/09/15
Identifying gender-based violence as a new area of crime listed in Article 83(1) TFEU (A9-0249/2021 - Malin Björk, Diana Riba i Giner)

One in three women in EU is exposed to violence. Around 50 women lose their lives to domestic violence every week. 75% of women within a professional setting have experienced sexual harassment.It’s quite baffling to look at the horrific data describing women’s daily reality. We cannot accept such things continuing to be part of our society, even much less to turn a blind eye to these realities being tolerated by local authorities.Gender-based violence jeopardizes the whole society. So many women are going through intimidation, stalking, harassment, psychological abuse, beating, raping and sexual exploitation. During the pandemic there was an increase in gender-based violence incidents.Violence against women is a violation of human rights. Women rights are human rights. European values should apply to all its citizens. We have to send a strong message. There is no place for violence against women in our societies. This is the time for real change.This European Directive should motivate Member States to fight violence against women. Such crimes should be taken seriously, prosecuted and punished. Local authorities should prioritize engaging with a wide range of reforms and preventive actions to ensure that violence against women is no longer a common event in our societies. Support services are required so that women can leave toxic situations.While this has been a continuing discussion, too little has changed. That is why identifying gender-based crimes as a new area of EU action should be supported, and therefore I voted in favour of this report.EU is not only an economic union, but also a union of values. it is a space where we should all feel safe to build better lives, fulfil our potential and contribute our best to the community we are a part of.
2021/09/16
Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations (A9-0294/2021 - Charles Goerens, Rainer Wieland)

Partidele și fundațiile politice puternice sunt esențiale pentru formarea conștiinței și identității politice europene, complementară identităților naționale. Ele contribuie la dezvoltarea unei sfere publice cu adevărat europene și la exprimarea corectă și completă a voinței cetățenilor europeni.Această rezoluție propune Consiliului și Comisiei îmbunătățiri-cheie la regulamentul care stabilește cadrul de funcționare și finanțare a partidelor și fundațiilor europene. Sunt aspecte pe care le-am susținut necondiționat alături de colegii mei din Delegația USR-PLUS și din Grupul Renew Europe.Este nevoie să creștem transparența finanțării și a cheltuielilor, printr-o monitorizare mai strictă a donațiilor, norme stricte de definire a eligibilității cheltuielilor, obligativitatea publicării situațiilor financiare anuale (într-un format ușor de parcurs) și prin asigurarea supravegherii cheltuielilor de către un auditor extern și de către Curtea de Conturi Europeană.Trebuie să asigurăm o mai bună reprezentare a partidelor politice mai mici la nivelul UE.Este esențială finanțarea acelor activități care contribuie la informarea cetățenilor europeni și la creșterea gradului de conștientizare privind beneficiile comunitare, politicile și deciziile Uniunii Europene care îi privesc direct.Propunerile cuprinse în această rezoluție oferă instrumentele necesare partidelor și fundațiilor politice la nivelul UE să aducă toți cetățenii statelor membre mai aproape de procesul decizional european.Am votat pentru rezoluția referitoare la aplicarea Regulamentului nr. 1141/2014 privind statutul și finanțarea partidelor politice europene și a fundațiilor politice europene.
2021/11/11
A Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (A9-0317/2021 - Dolors Montserrat)

Sănătatea este fundamentală pentru bunăstarea tuturor cetățenilor europeni, iar accesul echitabil la asistență medicală este definitoriu pentru politicile publice de sănătate, atât la nivel european, cât și în toate statele membre.În pandemie, întreruperea lanțului global de aprovizionare farmaceutică a evidențiat dependența UE de terți în sectorul sănătății, dar și nevoia de a asigura dreptul cetățenilor europeni la asistență medicală și tratament adecvat.Este timpul ca politicile publice de sănătate să plaseze pacientul în centrul lor. Este necesară includerea de măsuri legislative, acolo unde este cazul, pentru eliminarea disparităților și garantarea dreptului pacienților la tratamente și medicamente esențiale, inovatoare, în mod universal, accesibil, eficient, sigur și în timp util.Prin această rezoluție facem apel la Comisia Europeană să încurajeze dialogul între statele membre și toate părțile interesate pentru a promova produsele farmaceutice „fabricate în Europa”, prin consolidarea rezilienței în producție și aprovizionare. Vrem promovarea colaborărilor prin EURIPID și creșterea transparenței în domeniul cercetării. Comisia trebuie să abordeze cauzele fundamentale ale penuriei de produse farmaceutice și să propună soluții durabile și planuri de atenuare. Și, nu în ultimul rând, să fie atentă la comportamentul anticoncurențial și să investigheze practicile neloiale din industria farmaceutică.De asemenea, Comisia este chemată să evalueze opțiunile de politici care pot garanta că medicamentele autorizate la nivel central sunt comercializate în toate statele membre și nu doar unde există o piață profitabilă.Strategia farmaceutică pentru Europa propune instrumentele necesare ca toți cetățenii europeni să aibă acces la medicamentele de care au nevoie prin politici publice echitabile și nediscriminatorii, aplicabile tuturor statelor membre. De aceea, am votat pentru rezoluția referitoare la aplicarea regulamentului privind dezvoltarea unei strategii farmaceutice sustenabile și echitabile pentru Europa.
2021/11/24
Introduction of a European Social Security pass for improving the digital enforcement of social security rights and fair mobility (B9-0551/2021)

Digitalizarea coordonării securității sociale este esențială pentru a asigura portabilitatea drepturilor sociale. Digitalizarea coordonării securității sociale trebuie să aibă loc în cadrul digitalizării administrației publice din întreaga Europă, ținând cont, în același timp, de piețele muncii în continuă evoluție. Scopul acesteia este de a asigura o mobilitate echitabilă și durabilă a lucrătorilor. Libera circulație, inclusiv pe piața muncii, reprezintă un drept fundamental în Uniune, dar unii cetățeni nu-l pot exercita fără să se ocupe de proceduri administrative învechite care dovedesc că sunt incluși în sistemul de securitate socială al țării lor de origine.Furnizarea de servicii publice digitale este crucială pentru îmbunătățirea sectorului public și un răspuns adecvat la solicitările cetățenilor pentru interacțiuni mai eficiente cu administrațiile.Peste 17 milioane de cetățeni europeni locuiesc în alt stat decât statul de reședință, iar peste 70% dintre aceștia sunt activi în câmpul muncii. Românii reprezintă cel mai mare grup național dintre cetățenii mobili din Uniunea Europeană – aproape o cincime din populația rezidentă în țară.Având în vedere numărul în continuă creștere al lucrătorilor transfrontalieri, trebuie să ne asigurăm că drepturile lor sociale sunt respectate. Cu siguranță, asta nu se va întâmpla cu sisteme învechite și non-digitale. Consider esențial să depunem un efort consistent pentru a convinge statele să implementeze o reformă digitală. Este nevoie de ea dacă vrem să livrăm la nivel transfrontalier tuturor cetățenilor europeni securitatea socială la care au dreptul.De aceea am votat pentru introducerea unui card european de securitate socială pentru a îmbunătăți implementarea digitală a drepturilor de securitate socială și a mobilității echitabile.
2021/11/25
European Year of Youth 2022 (A9-0322/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)

2022 este Anul european al tineretului ‒ atât de necesar tinerilor europeni, după aproape doi ani de pandemie. Nu este o simplă titulatură, ci reunește oportunități pentru dezvoltarea talentelor, abilităților și noi experiențe esențiale tinerilor din cele 27 de state membre. Mai mult, înseamnă că vor fi depuse eforturi sporite să includem prioritățile tineretului în domeniile de politică relevante și la fiecare nivel al procesului decizional al Uniunii Europene. EYY are ca scop implicarea tinerilor în procese-cheie de consultare, precum Conferința privind Viitorul Europei și în alte politici publice atât din UE, cât și la nivel național și local.Salut impulsul Parlamentului European de a pune accentul pe tinerii cu mai puține oportunități. Totodată, mă bucur pentru decizia PE de a include problemele de sănătate mintală ‒ un capitol esențial pentru bunăstarea tinerilor și a tuturor cetățenilor europeni, mai ales în contextul restricțiilor din ultimii doi ani. Anul european al tineretului va include conferințe, inițiative care promovează participarea tinerilor la elaborarea politicilor, campanii de sensibilizare cu privire la o Uniune mai incluzivă, mai ecologică și digitală, precum și studii și cercetări privind situația în care se află tinerii din UE.Am votat clar în favoarea acestei rezoluții: cred cu tărie că tinerii sunt viitorul Europei și o parte prea puțin co-implicată activ în prezentul Uniunii.
2021/12/14
Situation at the Ukrainian border and in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine (B9-0593/2021, B9-0594/2021, B9-0595/2021, B9-0596/2021, B9-0597/2021, B9-0598/2021)

Federația Rusă și-a sporit substanțial prezența militară în ultimele luni la granița cu Ucraina, ceea ce coroborat cu declarațiile amenințătoare ale liderilor ruși reprezintă un pericol clar pentru securitatea întregii Uniuni Europene și cu atât mai mult pentru statele membre din flancul de est.Mobilizarea celor peste 100 000 de militari ruși la ușa Europei este un act ostentativ și intolerabil. Singura modalitate prin care putem să convingem Rusia lui Putin că trebuie să dea înapoi este solidaritatea statelor membre și a Uniunii Europene în fața acestui conflict care doar așteaptă un catalizator.Rusia consideră ofensatoare orice tentativă a unui stat din estul Uniunii de a adera la valorile democrației, respectarea drepturilor omului și principiile fundamentale europene. Kremlinul nu va ezita să creeze un val de tensiuni în Europa ‒ nu ar fi nicidecum prima abatere de acest fel.O nouă invadare a Ucrainei creează un lanț de conflicte cu rezultate tragice pe care nu le putem permite. De aceea, am votat pentru această rezoluție. Evenimentele din ultima perioadă de la granița Ucrainei cu Rusia nu trebuie ignorate ‒ ele privesc întreaga Europă. Rusia continuă să fie o țară care pune în pericol siguranța energetică, dar mai ales pacea și stabilitatea europenilor, două lucruri care nu sunt de la sine înțelese și pentru care trebuie să acționăm ferm și unitar.
2021/12/16
The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) (B9-0316/2022, RC-B9-0317/2022, B9-0317/2022, B9-0320/2022, B9-0321/2022, B9-0322/2022, B9-0323/2022)

. – Sunt jurist și am votat această rezoluție pentru că Uniunea Europeană înseamnă respectarea drepturilor omului, libertate, egalitate, stat de drept. Orice gravă încălcare a lor trebuie să aibă consecințe. Nu putem întoarce capul când un stat membru este în afara tratatelor prin acțiunile liderilor politici și ale partidelor de la guvernare. Banii europeni trebuie să ajungă la cetățeni, nu la partide de guvernare și prietenii lor.Hotărârile CJUE și ale instanțelor internaționale trebuie să fie respectate. Corupția, iliberalismul, legile cu dedicație, încălcarea drepturilor unor cetățeni - toate trebuie sancționate.În Uniunea Europeană nu este nimeni mai egal decât alții. Niciun stat, niciun președinte sau premier, nicio formațiune politică și niciun cetățean. Nu există țări membre de mâna a doua, nu există state membre mai cu moț. Aceleași reguli trebuie să se aplice tuturor.I am a lawyer and I voted in favor of this resolution because the European Union means respect for human rights, freedom, equality, rule of law. Any serious breach must have consequences. We cannot turn our heads when a Member State is outside the treaties through the actions of political leaders and governing parties. European money should go to the people, not to governing parties and their friends.CJEU and international courts decisions must be respected. Corruption, illiberalism, laws containing violations of citizens' rights - all must be punished.No one in the European Union is more equal than others. No state, no president or prime minister, no political party and no citizen. There are no second-hand member countries, there are no superior member states. The same rules apply to everyone.
2022/06/09
Better regulation: joining forces to make better laws (A9-0167/2022 - Tiemo Wölken)

Am votat pentru o mai bună legiferare. Politica este despre oameni, nu despre partide, instituții, proceduri. Cetățenii europeni ne-au spus apăsat că nu se simt reprezentați de multe dintre deciziile Uniunii, că nu mai au încredere, că UE înseamnă birouri și funcționari, că suntem desprinși de realitate, că nu-i înțelegem și nu-i ascultăm.Ne ia prea mult să luăm decizii, ne ia și mai mult să le implementăm. Nu-i pedepsim la timp și în mod egal pe cei care încalcă regulile comune. Nu-i susținem destul pe cei vulnerabili. Nu degeaba cetățenii acuză UE că decide de parcă există țări sau cetățeni de mâna a doua.Avem datoria să reprezentăm în mod egal românii și germanii, femeile și tinerii, antreprenorii și angajații, fermierii și consumatorii. Avem datoria să fim aproape de cetățeni și să îi consultăm. Cetățenii nu trebuie să plătească prețul ezitărilor noastre, ale deciziilor luate prea târziu și care rezolvă prea puțin. Trebuie să facem împreună legi mai bune mai rapid, simplu, mai puțin birocratic.
2022/07/07

Written questions (34)

The Commission’s joint procurement of the vaccine against COVID-19 – financing, distribution and branding
2020/11/24
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
State aid Temporary Framework and support for small and medium-sized enterprises
2020/11/26
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Food safety risks of imported meat from stolen and unidentified horses from Argentina
2020/12/03
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Immediate concrete steps to support civil society in Belarus
2020/12/21
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Developing a common vaccination card in the EU in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
2020/12/24
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Managing excessive amounts of plastic waste following the introduction of new EU rules on shipments of plastic waste
2021/01/19
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Clarification concerning the COVID-19 vaccine supply cuts in the EU
2021/02/03
Documents: PDF(59 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Legislative initiatives addressing voluntary idling of cars
2021/02/15
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(9 KB)
The principle of technological neutrality in the road transport sector, particularly in relation to pre-existing technologies
2021/03/29
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Road signs catalogue for independent safety assessment
2021/03/29
Documents: PDF(37 KB) DOC(9 KB)
EU prosecution of environmental crime, including its cross‑border dimension
2021/05/12
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Safe and secure parking areas for lorries and commercial vehicles and protection of haulage drivers
2021/05/18
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Belarusian state-sponsored air piracy and terrorism
2021/05/25
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Monitoring of EU funding for the green transition in Serbia and in the Western Balkan area generally
2021/10/04
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Assessment of the Nord Stream 2 investment arbitration case against the EU based on the Energy Charter Treaty
2021/10/20
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Written question on the death of a pregnant Polish woman after being denied an abortion
2021/11/30
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Profiling of EU citizens entering the United Kingdom
2022/02/04
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Trade restrictions / import ban on Russian and Belarusian wood and timber products
2022/03/11
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Using sanctions and seized property to motivate the Russian Federation to act in accordance with international law and pay for the damage it has caused
2022/04/06
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Erasmus4Ukraine
2022/04/09
Documents: PDF(55 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Forced deportations of Ukrainian citizens
2022/04/28
Documents: PDF(59 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Ukrainian refugees with disabilities
2022/05/02
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Erasmus+ budget for 2023
2022/07/06
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Austrian decision to invite Russian delegates to an OSCE meeting – legal consequences and reputational risks
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Digital infrastructure deficiencies at Constanța port: economic, societal, security and environmental effects
2023/04/05
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Opacity of purchase of Vodafone Hungary by Hungarian government and surveillance-related risks
2023/04/13
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The ongoing evaluation and upcoming review of the Environmental Liability Directive
2023/04/19
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The impact of the EU cohesion policy on the reduction of social inequalities in the EU
2023/05/04
Documents: PDF(62 KB) DOC(11 KB)
The funding gap faced by the EU Copernicus programme
2023/07/06
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Law on the culling of wolves in the province of Bolzano
2023/07/18
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Violence against companion animals in Bulgaria
2023/07/19
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Rise of antisemitism and hate speech in Bulgaria
2023/07/20
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Recognition of qualifications in the EU and mobility of citizens
2023/07/25
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Unlawful imposition on truck drivers of the duty to load and unload the goods they transport
2023/09/29
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)

Amendments (1125)

Amendment 1 #

2023/2181(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the smooth transition to SESAR 3 Joint Undertaking, operational since 30 November 2021 and acknowledges its effective coordination mechanisms; in particular, commends the creation of the States’ Representatives Group, enabling Member States to have a direct advisory role with regard to the partnership’s priorities, planning, and activities, the formation of the SESAR 3 JU Programme Committee, which guides R&I activities and the establishment of the Scientific Committee;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2023/2181(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the importance of the Undertaking in achieving the Digital European Sky, resulting in 48 selected projects with a total investment of EUR 350 million;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 8 #

2023/2181(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Notes that, when determining the error rate, SESAR 3 JU considered the outcomes of the remaining three participations that were being finalised; this resulted in a detected error rate of 2.39 %, with a systematic error of 1.69 % and a residual error rate of 1.75 %; The error rates reported for 2022, annual and cumulative, stayed within the materiality threshold;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 11 #

2023/2181(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes that corrective action has been take in response to the the ECA’s observation of 2021; Particularly, notes that SESAR 3 has duly paid the relevant employer's contributions to the EU pension scheme for the year 2022, in accordance with the invoices issued by the Commission;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Commends the responsibility role of EU-Rail for the coordination of the Back Office Arrangement (BOA)- Accounting Services, according to Article 13 of the Single Basic Act;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 2 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes that the implementation of the 2022 budget payments for Horizon 2020 activities experienced challenges, with beneficiaries encountering increased costs and delivery issues; stresses that the JU’s implementation rate for operational payment appropriations, including operational unused and reallocated appropriations, declined to 47% (compared to 61% in 2021); acknowledge that the duration of most Horizon 2020 projects had to be extended, and final payments were postponed to 2023 to address the difficulties faced by beneficiaries;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Acknowledge that for Horizon 2020 expenditure (clearings and final payments), the JU reported a representative error rate of 2.2 % and a residual error rate of 1.3%;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 4 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Commends the pivotal milestones achieved by the S2R Programme by the end of 2022, with full commitment of resources and about 86% of the Programme realized (and 91% in term of financial Programme execution for 2023), in view of reaching the TRL6/7 operational demonstrations planned for conclusion during 2023;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 5 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the JU’s final annual budget for 2022 was EUR 171.4 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 180.8 million in payment appropriations; notes that the implementation rate was 100 % for the former and 79.1 % for the latter; acknowledges that in 2022, a significant portion of payment appropriations was allocated towards the pre-financing of grants resulting from the first 2022 call for proposal;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 12 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the JU’s commitment to facilitate research and innovation activities for an integratedthe establishment of the Single European rRailway networkArea (SERA), ensuring interoperability sustainability, and resilience in the railway sector;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 13 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Commends EU-Rail for aligning its employer's pension contributions with the Commission's calculation; welcomes the cooperative approach to solve discrepancies and the commitment to adhere to clarified legal provisions and acknowledges EU-Rail's prompt payment of contributions in 2023 and ongoing commitment to future payments, contributing to the stability of the Union pension scheme; encourages continued collaboration for effective resolution of any outstanding issues;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 15 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Commends the maintenance of close collaboration with key stakeholders, namely ERRAC, ERA, and other programs/partnerships, signifies a proactive effort to foster synergies and explore opportunities for joint projects within the European rail sector; welcomes EU-Rail's engagement with associations and third-country programs, aimed at enhancing the competitiveness of the industry;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2023/2176(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8 c. In the 2022 annual accounts of the Undertaking, the amounts of contributions recognized per member category (EU and private members) exhibit a significant disparity, attributable to the fact that EU cash contributions are validated and recognized at the beginning of project implementation, while members' in-kind contributions are acknowledged only after validation of the costs incurred and declared for project implementation; calls for improved transparency in the JU's contribution recording, specifically distinguishing between cash and in-kind contributions for accurate representation;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that according to the Annual report of the European Court of Auditors on EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2022, the Undertaking’s final budget for 2022 was € 411.2 million in commitment appropriations and €415.3 million in payment appropriations (Title V unused included);
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 2 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Applauds that the JU has had a 100% rate of implementation for the commitment appropriations in 2022 and 89% for the payment appropriations;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Notes that implementation rate for the JU’s administrative payment budget (Title 2) stood at a low 54%; As outlined in the JU's report on budgetary and financial management, this was primarily attributed to the provision of IT and communication services in the last quarter of 2022 and to be paid in 2023, and reduced costs for services provided by the Commission; calls a and strategic planning to address the challenge identified and enhance the efficiency of administrative payment budget use;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 4 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the first open Call for Proposals by the JU, resulting in 19 Grant Agreements by year-end, totalling EUR 654 million around three core thrusts: Hybrid Electric Regional aircraft, Hydrogen-powered aircraft and Ultra- Efficient Short and Medium Range aircraft; the call comprehended 14 topics covering 13 Innovation Actions and one Coordination Support Action; in total 244 participants were selected across 24 different countries;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 10 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Welcomes that the ex-post audit results in 2022 had a representative error rate of 1.56% and that the corresponding residual error rate of 0.43%, staying well below the targeted threshold of 2%;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 12 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Acknowledges the efforts undertaken by the JU to enhance gender balance within its operations; recognizing the specific challenges presented by the technical nature of its focus areas, stresses the importance of continuous improvement in promoting diversity and gender equality;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 14 #

2023/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8 c. Acknowledges that the follow-up on the Court of Auditors' 2021 recommendation concerning the use of interim staff remains pending; Urges the Undertaking to promptly resolve this matter;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the finding of the Court of Auditors that the accounts of the European Union Agency for Railways ('the Agency') for the 2022 financial year are legal and regular in all material aspects; notes that some of the Court’s observations from previous years remain open at the end of 2022;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 4 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Remarks that ERA has driven several initiatives, taken at EU level, aimed at boosting rail traffic (both passenger and freight), including measures to better manage and coordinate international rail traffic or the development of new technologies, such as train automation, contributing to the European Green Deal;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 7 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Acknowledges the Agency’s commendable performance in 2022, fulfilling its role as the EU authority responsible for issuing authorizations for placing railway vehicles on the market, single safety certificates for railway undertakings, and ERTMS trackside approvals; Salutes the increase in Agency’s delivery of authorisations for placing 1861 railway vehicles on the market, 66 single safety certificates for railway undertakings and 2 ERTMS trackside approvals despite the increase in the number of applications received; recalls the importance of completion of ERTMS by 2030; Commends that these accomplishments represent record- breaking figures since the full implementation of the Technical Pillar of the 4th Railway Package by the Agency;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 14 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that the Agency has the smallest budget among the transport agencies despite the outstanding environmental benefits of rail prioritized by Commission; Commends the rise in the fiscal year 2022 budget, accompanied by various efforts aimed at enhancing competitiveness, improving safety, and promoting cross-border interoperability; Nevertheless, calls for an increase of the budget of the Agency in order to ensure it has the essential resources to function as an efficient authority and effectively fulfil its tasks;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Acknowledges the Agency's efforts towards gender parity; notes that there is significant room for improvement. Currently, the overall staff distribution stands at 65% men and 35% women and this gender gap is even more pronounced in management roles. Urges the Agency to intensify its commitment to achieving a truly balanced gender representation, given the findings of the 2022 gender audit;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 18 #

2023/2160(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Commends the Agency’s proactive response to the recommendations put forth in the previous year's observation, urging the Agency to introduce effective checks for verifying SME status of applicants. Welcomes the implementation of enhanced controls for verifying the SMEs status for Single Safety Certificates and Vehicle Authorizations applications;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2023/2158(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Applauds the commitment of the Agency to enhance its multilingual communication ensuring greater accessibility for all European citizens; Notes that EMSA’s five year strategy, the European Maritime Environmental and the European Maritime Safety Report are now accessible in all 24 EU languages;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 6 #

2023/2158(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Salutes the Agency’s continued strengthening of its surveillance activities, including satellite and RPAS capacities; welcomes the achievement that the Agency RPAS services have collectively accumulated 1305 operational days (828 days dedicated to multipurpose surveillance and 477 days for environmental surveillance);
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 9 #

2023/2158(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses that the EU's fleet growth (in terms of both ships and tonnage) is slower compared to the global fleet. In the last five years, the EU fleet experienced a growth of 3.4%, in contrast to the global fleet, which exhibited a more substantial growth rate of 7%;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 10 #

2023/2158(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Welcomes that the Agency support the Commission at IMO, particularly in forums such as MEPC, PPR and CCC. This supports spans crucial areas of pollution prevention and sustainability including the IMO Strategy on reducing GHG emissions, carbon intensity of shipping, safety, evaluation, deployment and use of sustainable alternative fuels and technologies, marine litter and underwater noise;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1 #

2023/2145(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the finding of the Court of Auditors that the accounts of the European Aviation Safety Agency ('the Agency') for the 2022 financial year are legal and regular in all material respects despite certain identified shortcomings and vulnerabilities in public procurement practices; acknowledges weaknesses in the systems governing management and control and as of the conclusion of 2022, a number of observations raised by the Court in preceding years continue to remain unresolved;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 2 #

2023/2145(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that appropriations authorised in the Agency’s budget for 2022 totalled EUR 224 million and welcomes the budget implementation rate for year 2022 at 97.1%, above the Commission’s target of 95%;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2023/2145(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Commends the Agency's proficiency in execution, maintaining a favourable trajectory with 77% of KPIs deemed on-track; acknowledges that 17% of KPIs have experienced delays, and a 5% necessitate additional attention;
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 9 #

2023/2145(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Commends the response of the Agency to Russian invasion to Ukraine publishing a Conflict Zone Information Bulletin (CZIB) within two hours for aircraft safety. Understands concerns about Russian passenger fleets; highlights Agency’s role in European military mobility; in particular, welcomes the involvement of the Agency in the Civil- Military Airspace Safety Team Ukraine, especially in relation to the increasing demands for airspace to facilitate State and NATO military exercises; acknowledges the successful implementation of the work programme with the European Defence Agency (EDA), which has significantly bolstered collaboration in the emerging frontier of innovation.
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 12 #

2023/2145(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the contribution of the Agency in shaping standardized rules for drones' safe integration and its effort in supporting U-Space regulations and contributing to the EU's Drones Strategy 2.0, fostering a competitive and sustainable European drone industry.
2023/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 26 #

2023/2058(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore the possibility of using the EU budget’s expenditure and revenue mechanisms as response instruments and for redistribution purposes during symmetrical and asymmetrical crises, such as through a permanent fiscal capacity for the euro area, and a solidarity mechanism for Member States outside of the euro area.
2023/09/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas petitioners tend to be citizens engaged in safeguarding fundamental rights and in the improvement and future well-being of our societies; whereas the experience of these citizens in regard to the processing of their petitions is very influential in determining their perception of the EU institutions, knowledge about the actions taken at EU level and respect for the right to petition as enshrined in EU law;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the right to petition the European Parliament is one of the fundamental rights of EU citizens; whereas the right to petition provides EU citizens and residents with an open, democratic and transparent mechanism to address their elected representatives directly and is therefore essential to enable citizens to participate actively and effectively in the life of the Union; whereas the processing of petitions is very influential in determining the petitioners’ perception of the EU institutions andeffective address by the Commission and the Member States to the issues presented in the petitions, as well as the compensation and redress provided to the petitioners who became victims of the EU legislation breach, increases the trust they put in the Union and its policies; whereas, therefore, it is essential to maintain high standards when implementing this right and processing petitions; whereas, through petitions, EU citizens can complain about failures to implement EU law and help detect breaches of EU law;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the right to petition offers Parliament the opportunity to address and respond to complaints and concerns relating to issues in the EU’s fields of activity; whereas the right to petition enables Parliament and the other EU institutions, in particular the Commission as guardian of the Treaties, to enhance their responsiveness to alleged non- compliance with EU legislation in the Member States; whereas petitions are therefore a useful source of information on instances of misapplication or breaches of EU law and, thus, enable Parliament and the other EU institutions to assess the transposition and application of EU law and its impact on the rights of EU citizens and residents; petitions represent a basis for the Member States to provide compensation and redress to the petitioners who became victims or incurred losses due to the breach of the legislation by the relevant Member States;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 14 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital R
R. whereas when adopting its meeting agenda, the Committee on Petitions should pay attention to petitions and topics with significant relevance for discussion at EU level and to the need to maintain an equitable geographical coverage of topics according to the petitions received; whereas, in this regard there is a need to raise awareness on the right to petition the European Parliament in the Member States and areas from which originate statistically less petitions;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 17 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U
U. whereas, in 2022, the Committee on Petitions held seven fact-finding visits; whereas this represents a large increase compared to the single fact-finding visit organised in 2021; whereas this can be explained by the need in 2021 to minimise health risks for Parliament’s Members and staff in the context of the spread of COVID-19 and therefore by the consecutive postponement of two fact- finding visits in 2022; whereas there is a need of increased communication on national level about the fact-finding visits, in order to allow the citizens to see that the EP delegation is present on the ground and is looking into the issues which affect their lives;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of a continuous public debate on the Union’s fields of activity in order to ensure that citizens are correctly informed about the scope of the Union’s competences and the different levels of decision-making; reiterates its call, in this regard, for broader awareness raising campaigns in all the official languages of the EU, through the active involvement of communications services, to help increase citizens’ knowledge about their right to petition, as well as the scope of the Union’s responsibilities and the competences of the Committee on Petitions, with a view to reducing the number of inadmissible petitions and better responding to citizens’ concerns;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 24 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that petitions constitute a unique opportunity for Parliament and the other EU institutions to directly connect with EU citizens and maintain a regular dialogue with them, particularly in cases where they are affected by the misapplication or breach of EU law; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation between the EU institutions and national, regional and local authorities on inquiries regarding the implementation of and compliance with EU law; believes that such cooperation is crucial to address and resolve citizens’ concerns over the application of EU law and that it contributes to strengthening the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the Union , as well as the participation of citizens and residents in the democratic processes; calls, therefore, for the participation of Member States’ representatives in committee meetings and for timely and detailed responses to requests for clarification or information sent by the Committee on Petitions to national authorities;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the European dimension of the Committee on Petitions, which can be addressed by citizens from all 27 Member States on issues that fall within the scope of the EU Treaties and EU law; believes that the Committee has a special responsibility to uphold this European dimension and to demonstrate the added value of European unity and integration to citizens; is of the opinion that the treatment of petitions, as well as the organisation of fact-finding visits based on those petitions, should be geographically balanced and proportionate to the size of each Member State; believes, in this respect, that the European Parliament should increase its efforts to promote the role and work of its Committee on Petitions and raise awareness among all EU citizens of the possibility to address aright to petition to the European Parliament; urges the political groups represented in the Committee on Petitions to seek consensus and balance with regard to selecting and treating petitions;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 29 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the European dimension of the Committee on Petitions, which can be addressed by citizens from all 27 Member States on issues that fall within the scope of the EU Treaties and EU law; believes that the Committee has a special responsibility to uphold this European dimension and to demonstrate the added value of European unity and integration to citizens; is of the opinion that the treatment of petitions should be geographically balanced and proportionate to the sizepopulation of each Member State; believes, in this respect, that the European Parliament should increase its efforts to promote the role and work of its Committee on Petitions and raise awareness among all EU citizens of the possibility to address a petition to the European Parliament; urges the political groups represented in the Committee on Petitions to seek consensus and balance with regard to selecting and treating petitions;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 36 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Finds it worrying that the Commission does not provide updated information on petitions related to infringement procedures and on their state of play; deplores, in this regard, the lack of systematic follow-up in the communication with the Committee on Petitions; reiterates its call on the Commission to regularly update the Committee on Petitions on developments in infringement proceedings and to ensure that the Committee on Petitions gets access to the relevant Commission documents on infringement procedures and legislative initiatives which were launched based on the petitions received, and on EU Pilot procedures; is of the opinion that increased transparency and regular feedback on the handling of ongoing infringement procedures by the Commission would be beneficial for the Committee’s follow-up of open petitions;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 39 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to assess whether national authorities are taking the necessary measures to respond to citizens’ concerns as expressed in their petitions where cases of failure to comply with EU law occur, and to launch infringement procedures where necessary; believes that early action by the Commission in cases of breaches of EU law is crucial to prevent such breaches from becoming systemic in nature; believes that it is essential for the national authorities to be aware of the consequences where there is no redress to the breach to the Union law demonstrated by the petition after its presentation in the committee on Petitions;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the huge increase in the number of petitions submitted on external relations issues compared to previous years; notes that this could be explained by the geopolitical context in 2022 and in particular the Russian aggression against Ukraine; notes that the Committee on Petitions took account of citizen’s concerns about security, humanitarian aid, sanctions, security of food supply, military and financial support to Ukraine, conflict resolution, visa policy, energy supply and the integration of Ukraine in the EU, among other issues, putting a number of petitions dealing in particular with questions related to the situation of refugees, children’s rights and food supply on the agenda; underlines that particularly the committee on Foreign Affairs and the committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, should take note of those petitions for their deliberations concerning Ukraine;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 48 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that environmental issues remained an area of serious concern for petitioners in 2022, with more than 20% of petitions dedicated to environmental issues; regrets that environmental rules are not always correctly implemented in the Member States, as described in numerous petitions raising complaints aboutwith some of them being under infringement procedures for the breach of the EU environmental legislation, as described in numerous petitions raising complaints about conservation of big carnivores, protection of forest areas, air quality, noise pollution, waste management and the deterioration of natural ecosystems, among other things; points to the work the Committee on Petitions continued to carry out in 2022 on the impact of mining activities on the environment, putting a number of petitions received on this topic on the agenda; draws attention to citizens’ concerns about the environmental impacts of renewable energy, especially relating to wind farms, and to the public hearing of 15 June 2022 on the social and environmental impacts of renewable energy;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 52 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Draws attention to the public hearing of the Committee on Petitions of 25 March 2022 on an EU Green Prosecutor which assessed the shortcomings and challenges in the enforcement of EU environmental criminal law on the basis of petitions received, as well as new tools to tackle environmental crime, including the possible creation of a European Green Prosecutor’s Office, and paved the way for the adoption of an opinion by the committee; points out in this regard the opinion of the Committee on Petitions on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directive 2008/99/EC;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 53 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of delivering on EU citizens’ expectations regarding the protection of the environment, and in particular of taking action in the field of illegal logging; underlines, in this regard, the follow-up actions by Parliament of Petitions Nos 0289/2015, 0625/2018, 1248/2019, 0408/2020, 0722/2020 and 1056/2021, raising concerns over increasing illegal logging and specific cases of practices that are in breach of EU environmental legislation in somenumber of Member States; points, in this regard, to the European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2022 on illegal logging in the EU7 adopted on the basis of a motion for a resolution by the Committee on Petitions in addition to its question for oral answer and to a fact- finding visit concerning alleged breaches of EU environmental law; _________________ 7 OJ C 32, 27.1.2023, p. 20.
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 54 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Emphasizes that the petitions related to environment once again in 2022 made up the largest share of petitions received by the European Parliament expressing clear citizens' demands in the strict protection of unique ecosystems and species, including Europe's last old- growth and primary forests and invaluable wetlands and peatlands, as well as pointing out to the breaches of the EU legislation including the Water Framework Directive and the Birds and Habitats Directives and its provisions on protection of unique ecosystems and species including on the strict protection of large carnivores;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 55 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Stresses moreover the importance of reflecting on EU citizens' demands with regards to significant number of petitions received in 2022 calling for improvement of animal welfare standards including in live animal transports, restrictions to fast-growth broilers, negative impact of cages and other welfare conditions of farmed animals and reminds the Commission in this regard to implement without delay its commitment in line with its Communication in response to the ECI 'End the Cage Age' and propose a legislative proposal on animal welfare;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 57 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Urges the Commission, again, together with the Member States, to ensure the correct implementation of EU legislation in the environmental field; calls on the Commission to apply effective measures in cases where the infringement of the EU environmental legislation persists;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 58 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to launch an infringement procedure without delay when the failure to implement EU environmental legislation has been detected and calls on the Commission to proceed with the ongoing infringements in reasonable timeframe in order to prevent further deterioration of the environment;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 60 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses the important contribution made by the Committee on Petitions to the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities, as revealed by its treatment of a number of petitions on this sensitive topic; points, in this regard, to the opinion of the Committee on Petitions entitled ‘Towards equal rights for people with disabilities’ adopted on 13 July 20228 ; recalls the annual workshop of 30 November 2022 on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which the Committee on Petitions held to focus on disability assessment, mutual recognition and the EU Disability Card which shed light on the obstacles reported in petitions by persons with disabilities when they move across the EU; recalls that the Commission should address the cases where the national authorities refuse to recognise the rights for social security benefits for disabled people, thus leaving them without necessary means to cover their basic needs ; _________________ 8 Opinion adopted as part of procedure 2022/2026(INI), concluding with the adoption of the European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2022 towards equal rights for persons with disabilities. OJ C 177, 17.5.2023, p. 13.
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 64 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the ECI is an important instrument for active citizenship and public participation; underlines the Commission's commitments in its responses to valid ECIs in order not to undermine citizens' trust in the institute of ECI as the most significant instrument of participatory democracy; welcomes the discussion in several meetings of some unsuccessful ECIs as petitions, which gave citizens the opportunity to present their ideas and hold a constructive debate, as well as facilitating the participation of EU citizens in the democratic process of the Union; takes note of the significant number of new ECIs registered by the Commission in 2022, which shows that citizens are seizing the opportunity to use participatory instruments to have a say in policy and law-making processes; calls on the Commission to better engage with citizens and give adequate follow-up to successful ECIs;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 67 #

2023/2047(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Recalls that the petitioners should be able not only to take part in the deliberations on petitions which they have submitted, but also in the fact-finding visits which are based on those petitions; recalls in this regard the need to implement the possibility for petitioners to have their travel expenses reimbursed when they take part in a fact-finding visit of the Petitions committee;
2023/10/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 1 #

2023/0297(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the increasing number of severe and destructive natural disasters in Europe; underlines that due to climate change extreme weather events such as those observed in Romania and Italy resulting in emergencies are going to further intensify and multiply; urges the Union therefore to strengthen its efforts to tackle climate change both in the Union and globally; calls in this regard for the increase of the EUSF ceilings in the framework of the revision of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2020/2093 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund;
2023/09/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2023/0297(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the increase of the maximum annual budget of the EUSF from €500 million to €1 billion, so that it can adequately respond to the intensification of natural disasters within the Union and provide tangible support to the Member States affected by it;
2023/09/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2023/0297(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls furthermore to introduce provisions during the revision of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021-2027, allowing to decouple the EUSF allocations dedicated to the Member States from those dedicated to the third countries, so as to avoid the moral issue of the need to prioritise ones or the others due to the limited amount of Fund resources;
2023/09/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2023/0297(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to considerably reduce the time necessary for the treatment of the applications for the mobilisation of this Fund, so as to allow the relevant authorities to address the restauration needs as soon as possible, and consequently reduce the continuation of the damage spread.
2023/09/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets the gradual decrease of the EU budget as a percentage of EU gross national income (GNI) and the excessive focus on capping overall spending at roughly 1 % of EU GNI; considers that this has made it difficult for the Union to deliver on its agreed ambitions and deprived it of the ability to respond to crises and emerging needs while ensuring democratic accountability; regrets that the Commission has been forced to resort to double counting methods and the re-use of existing funds, disguising the current situation of the EU budget;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls its long-standing position that new policy priorities or tasks should be accompanied by fresh money; regrets for instance the redeployments made on CEF Digital to finance the Digital Europe Programme, as well as the planned earmarking and redeployment made on several lines of the Horizon Europe and Single Market Programmes in order to finance the creation of the European Net Zero Industry Academies to bring the necessary skills to workers and deploy learning programmes on net-zero technologies as part of the Net Zero Industry Act proposal;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 37 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. In the context of the European electoral year, reiterates the importance for direct funding for cities to implement EU programmes locally, as it will allow increased support for project applications, and gain higher visibility on EU priorities and EU programmes such as forthe fight against climate change, or to promote the Rule of Law;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 40 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Recalls the essential work carried out by decentralised agencies; considers that agencies must be properly staffed and adequately resourced so that they can perform their tasks; recalls that the tasks of agencies evolve in line with policy priorities and stresses that new responsibilities must be accompanied by corresponding levels of fresh resources;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 63 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that, as part of the STEP proposal designed to secure the open strategic autonomy of the Union, reduce dependence on non-EU countries and boost investment in key strategic sectors, additional appropriations are to be allocated to InvestEU and to the European Innovation Council (EIC); proposes, therefore, to increase appropriations for the InvestEU guarantee by EUR 1,05 billion and for the EIC by EUR 125 million in 2024 in line with its MFF interim report; proposes, furthermore, to make available again EUR 500 million in research decommitments under Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation for the EIC under Horizon Europe, in addition to the EUR 95 million included in the DB; underlines that the STEP instrument will not be enough to ensure a common European response through the EU budget and to strengthen the Union’s open strategic autonomy, reducing dependencies in strategic sectors and financing investment in key related sectors; therefore, calls on the Commission to rapidly build upon the STEP instrument in order to create in the near future a robust Sovereignty Fund with a real financial capacity to achieve the objective of the Union’s open strategic autonomy;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 65 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls that the recently agreed Chips Act has a significant impact on the budget under Heading 1, in particular for Horizon Europe and for Digital Europe; underlines that, in accordance with the political agreement on the Chips Act, an additional EUR 50 million is required to meet funding needs over the period 2024 to 2027; proposes, therefore, to cover 25 % of that shortfall by allocating EUR 12,5 million to the Chips Joint Undertaking in 2024; Moreover, underlines that financing for the Chips Act has just been agreed, making the Council cut especially difficult to understand as it goes against a clear Union priority.
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 80 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines the importantessential role played by the decentralised agencies active under this heading; proposes to increase appropriations and staffing for the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity and the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators in line with their identified needs and expanding mandates;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 97 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Points, in this regard, to the flagship Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps (ESC) programmes, which play a vital role in supporting learning mobility opportunities, improving people’s skills and employability and promoting social inclusion; emphasises that both programmes aim to boost participation rates among people with fewer opportunities - an objective that is challenged by soaring inflation and the increased cost of living; calls also on Member States to reassess scholarship amounts in the light of the high inflation; is committed to ensuring that Erasmus+ does not become a de facto selective programme open only to those who can afford to participate and recalls that the Commission is required to put in place financial support measures for people with fewer opportunities; proposes, therefore, an increase of EUR 100 million for Erasmus+ and EUR 2 million for the ESC above DB specifically to ensure the programmes are accessible for all;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 100 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the importance of a stronger Health Union and enhanced preparedness in post-pandemic Europe, as well as the need to better understand and treat long COVID; highlights the vital role that the EU4Health programme plays in this respect, as well as in supporting actions to achieve universal health coverage across the Union, encompassing quality access to sexual and reproductive health services; proposes, therefore, to increase the programme’s appropriations by EUR 20 million above DB, including to help offset redeployments towards the European Health Emergency and Response Authority;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 102 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is alarmed by the growing impact of natural disasters in Europe and its neighbourhood and concerned about the EU’s ability to respond effectively; underlines that these disasters are often linked to climate change and are therefore likely to occur with greater frequency and intensity in the future; is concerned about the EU’s ability to respond effectively; increases, therefore, appropriations for the Union Civil Protection Mechanism by EUR 20 million above DB in order to ensure an effective response and protect human lives, to enhance the Union’s response capacity and better protect its citizens, including capacities for the mobilisation of medical units in emergencies, and underlines the need to invest in climate mitigation and adaptation for particularly vulnerable regions; ;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 105 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Underscores that soaring energy prices and inflation, following on from the COVID-19 pandemic, have had a significant impact on the cultural and creative sectors, which are often made up of small organisations and individual artists; emphasises the key role that Creative Europe plays in supporting European creations and Union values as well as the recovery of the cultural and creative sectors, fostering media literacy and combatting disinformation; recalls that free press and media pluralism have been under attack in the European Union and that the digital shift creates additional hurdles for a diverse field of media to flourish, which leads the Union to significantly strengthen its support for pluralistic media as the essential basis for a functioning democracy; proposes, therefore, to increase financing for the Creative Europe programme by EUR 25 million above DB, with EUR 15 million for the Culture strand and EUR 10 million for the Cross-Sectoral strand, which plays a vital role in tackling disinformation and promoting media literacy;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 113 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Takes note that, in 2024, EUR 4.8 billion of the ESF+ budget under shared management would be allocated on food aid and basic material assistance for the most deprived persons, thus going beyond the actual objective of 4% and highlighting the worrying increase in the number of deprived persons; calls on Member States to allocate more of their ESF+ funds to organisations providing the most vulnerable and deprived persons with assistance and food aid, especially in context where the inflation is high and they face increasing demands;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 115 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Recalls the importantessential role played by the decentralised agencies under Heading 2b; increases funding and staffing levels for the European Institute for Gender Equality, the European Labour Authority and the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation in line with the agencies’ identified needs; proposes, furthermore, to reinforce the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in terms of financing and staff to allow the body to fulfil its duties andUnderlines the importance of protecting the Union budget against fraud, corruption and other prohibited conduct, which adversely affect the Union and national budgets; stresses, in this regard, the central role that the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) plays in protecting the Union’s financial interests, including with respect to the use of NextGenerationEU funds, and ensuring compliance with the rule of law; decides, therefore, to apply targeted reinforcements to the EPPO and increase its staffing levels to allow the body to fulfil its mandate, thereby reinforcing efforts against fraud, corruption, money laundering and organised crime; calls on all the Member States to join the EPPO and ensure a better protection of the Union’s financial interests; recalls the importance of compliance with the general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 118 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Underlines that the STEP proposal includes additional commitment appropriations in 2024 for the Innovation Fund under Heading 3 and a commensurate increase in the ceiling; considers that the proposed allocation for the Innovation Fund is not to the level of ambition needed but marks important progress towards its full budgetisation; proposes, therefore, to create a new budget line for the Innovation Fund, with appropriations of EUR 1,25 billion in line with its MFF interim report;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 132 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Stresses that the war has vastly increased pressure on asylum systems in the Member States and that the Union must provide longer-term support to the host Member States to address the ever increasing pressure on national asylum and migration systems, including at the external borders, due to a rise of applications for international protection in the Member States and the exceptional support of the EU to host refugees from Ukraine; stresses moreover that a strong budget is necessary for the reception of asylum seekers and the integration of refugees in their host societies, as well as for strengthening the effective returns of migrants with no right to stay in the EU, and other actions that need a coordinated response, such as resettlement or legal pathways; further stresses that a stronger AMIF budget is a key determinant for the successful implementation of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum the adoption of which is expected before the end of this mandate; reiterates the need to facilitate the reception and integration of refugees from Ukraine, and to help face the recent migration trends via the Mediterranean route and anticipate the financial implications of a timely agreement on the Pact on Asylum and Migration (AMIF); decides, therefore, to reinforce the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund by EUR 110 million above DB in 2024 given AMIF’s positive contribution in providing immediate support to refugees;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 167 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
58. Reiterates its commitment to the international dimension of Erasmus+, whichin line with the need identified by the Commission to provide support to Ukrainian students and teaching staff, as well as to all students to cope with high inflation; recalls that Erasmus + enables learning mobility exchanges with partner countries around the world; increases, therefore, appropriations for the international dimension of Erasmus+ by EUR 10 million above DB, split evenly between the NDICI and IPA III; underlines that these appropriations will also help to flatten the heavily back loaded financial profile of Erasmus+, providing more consistent annual financing for a programme with stable year-on-year demand; calls also on Member States to reassess scholarship amounts in the light of the high inflation;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 173 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
69. CondemnsDisagrees with the Commission’s horizontal approach to reduce the estimates of the institutions in order to adhere to the principle of stable staffing, and to a maximum increase of 2 % for non-salary related expenditure, despite the inflationary pressures for a second year in a row and irrespective of new tasks given to the institutions by the Commission and the co- legislators;
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 175 #

2023/0264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 72 – point c
(c) increase the establishment plans above the DB with the corresponding appropriations in line with the institutions’ requests for the European Data Protection Supervisor and European Data Protection Board to enable them to face new responsibilities and partially in line with the institutions’ requests for the European Committee of the Regions to enhance cybersecurity capabilities and the European External Action Service to enhance primarily cybersecurity and the fight against disinformation, and also to implement the Strategic Compass, and strengthen the crisis response centrer and enhance cybersecurity and the fight against disinformation.
2023/09/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 76 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Since the beginning of Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the Union, its Member States and European financial institutions have mobilised unprecedented support to Ukraine’s economic, social and financial resilience, combining support from the Union budget, including the exceptional macro-financial assistance and support from the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, fully or partially guaranteed by the Union budget, as well as further financial support by Member States. In addition to this comes the continuous support provided by the authorities, communities and volunteers’ groups within the Member States in relation to Ukrainian war refugees.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 79 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Given that as long as the Russian war in Ukraine lasts, tax revenues collected by the Ukrainian government will continue to be largely allocated to the war effort, and that a residual gap remains in Ukraine’s financing needs for at least until 2027, significant and flexible support to the Ukrainian government to maintain its functions as well as to support the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of the country has to be mobilised quickly.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 80 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Given that a residual gap remains in Ukraine’s financing needs for at least until 2027, flexible support to the Ukrainian government to maintain its functions and guarantee basic public services, as well as to support the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of the country has to be mobilised.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 85 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Given the damage from Russia’s war of aggression to the Ukrainian economy, society and infrastructure, the support to the country to maintain its functions, as well as short relief, fast recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of Ukraine will require comprehensive support to rebuild the economy, to create the foundations of a free and prosperous country with a strong market economy, anchored in European values, well integrated into the European and global economy, and progressing well on its path of accession to the European Union.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 86 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Given the damage from Russia’s war of aggression to the Ukrainian economy, society and infrastructure, the support to the country to maintain its functions, as well as short relief, fast recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of Ukraine will require comprehensive support to rebuild the economy, to create the foundations of a free and prosperous country, anchored in European values, well integrated into the European and global economy, and progressing wactivelly on its path of accession to the European Union.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 90 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Ukraine Facility should be underpinned by a coherent and prioritised plan for reconstruction (the ‘Ukraine Plan’), prepared by the Government of Ukraine, with the consultation of Verkhovna Rada and representatives of civil society organisations, providing a structured and predictable framework for the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of Ukraine, clearly articulated with Union accession requirements.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 99 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Facility should contribute to closing the funding gap of Ukraine until 2027, by providing grants and highly concessional financial relief in a predictable, continuous, orderly and timely manner. The assistance should support macro-financial stability in Ukraine, and ease Ukraine’s external financing constraints. Such support should be provided based on concrete reforms and reconstruction projects with clear milestones and timetables. The assistance should support macro-financial stability in Ukraine, and ease Ukraine’s external financing constraints. In the interest of ensuring Ukraine’s debt sustainability, preference should be given, to the extent possible, to grants. Further, the development and the outlook of the debt situation needs to be closely monitored to adapt and optimise the ratio between loans and grants, to guarantee the availability of the resources under this Facility until 2027.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 102 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The Facility should tie the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation closely to the Union perspective, by linking financial support to the fulfilment of reforms and investments in view of accession without unduly restricting access to essential financial aid in times of war.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 105 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) The medium-term perspective provided by the Ukraine Plan through a single instrument should also encourage Ukraine to channel investments and reforms toward the transition to a green, digital and inclusive economy, and help mobilise like-minded donors for multiannual contributions to support Ukraine, as well as to mobilise private investments.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 111 #

2023/0200(COD)

(22) The Union should also foster close consultation and association of local authorities, which embrace a large variety of sub-national levels and branches of government, including regions, municipalities, rayons and hromadas and their associations, as well as their participation in the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of Ukraine, based on sustainable development and through the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals at local level. The Union should recognise the multiple roles played by the local authorities as promoters of a territorial approach to local development, including decentralisation processes, participation and accountability, and further enhance its support for local authorities’ capacity building, as well as provision of expertise necessary for the implementation of projects under this Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 118 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union provides that any European State which respects the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, and is committed to promoting those values may apply to become a member of the Union. Those values are common to Member States in a society in which inclusiveness, pluralism, non- discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 125 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Reconstruction from the damage caused by the war of Russian aggression cannot be limited to rebuilding what was destroyed as it was before the war. The reconstruction offers an opportunity to support Ukraine in its process of integration into the Single Market and in accelerating its sustainable green and digital transitions, in line with Union policies. The Facility should promote reconstruction in a way that modernises and improves Ukraine’s economy and society, building on Union rules and standards, by investing in the transition of Ukraine towards a green, digital and inclusive economy and in the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of its critical infrastructure, productive capacity and human capital in a resilient way. Such reconstruction should aim to be gender- balanced and aim to include to the maximum extent possible the needs of vulnerable groups, such as war veterans and persons with disabilities.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 137 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) The implementation of this Regulation should be guided by the principles of equality and non- discrimination, as elaborated in the Union of Equality strategies. It should promote gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, and seek to protect and promote women’s and girls’ rights in line with the EU Gender Action Plans and relevant Council conclusions and international conventions. The implementation of the Facility should be in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in its investments and technical assistance. The measures financed under this Facility should involve war veterans, persons with disabilities and organisations which represent vulnerable groups.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 143 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Strengthening the rule of law, including the independence of the judiciary, the fight against corruption (and notably grand corruption, understood as the abuse of high-level power that benefits the few, and causes serious and widespread harm to individuals and society1a), money laundering and organised crime, as well as transparency, good governance at all levels, safeguarding the free and pluralistic media and fighting disinformation, strengthening public administration reform, including in the fields of public procurement, competition and State aid, remain key challenges and are essential for Ukraine to come closer to the Union and to prepare to fully assume the obligations of Union membership. In view of the longer-term nature of the reforms pursued in those areas and the need to build up track records, support under the Ukraine Facility should address those issues as early as possible. _________________ 1a ECA special report 23/2021: "Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine: several EU initiatives, but still insufficient results"
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 147 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In accordance with the principle of participatory democracy, the Union should encourage the strengthening of parliamentary capacities, parliamentary oversight, democratic procedures and fair representation in Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is expected to be informed and consulted at all the stages of the Facility life-cycle.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 157 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The general objectives of the Ukraine Facility should be to assist Ukraine in addressing the social, economic and environmental consequences of the war, contributing to the reconstruction, including recovery, and modernisation of the country; in fostering social, economic and environmental resilience and progressive integration into the Union and global economy and markets; and in preparing Ukraine for future membership of the Union by supporting its accession process. Such objectives should be pursued in a mutually reinforcing manner and with a regular monitoring of the evolving social and economic circumstances in Ukraine. Ukraine is expected to guarantee public access to the information on funding opportunities under this Facility, as well as free and fair competition during tendering process and grant allocation under this Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 165 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) In line with the European Pillar of Social Rights, the Facility should support solidarity, integration, and social justice with the aim of creating and sustaining quality employment and sustainable growth, ensuring equality of, and access to, opportunities and social protection, protecting vulnerable groups, including orphans, persons with disabilities and war veterans, and improving living standards. The Facility should also contribute to fighting poverty and homelessness and tackling unemployment and lead to quality job creation, the inclusion and integration of disadvantaged groups. The Facility should provide for investment opportunities in skills including through vocational education and training aiming to prepare the workforce to the digital and green transitions. It should also enable the strengthening of social dialogue, infrastructure and services.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 170 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46 a (new)
(46a) For the scope of this Facility, the assets confiscated in the context of Russian aggression against Ukraine under the directive on asset recovery and confiscation and the directive on the definition of criminal offences and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures should be used in the form of grants in order to contribute to the rebuilding and reconstruction in Ukraine. The Union and its Member States are working towards establishing a legal basis for the confiscation of Russian public assets for the purpose of financing Ukraine’s reconstruction and compensating the victims of Russia’s aggression. The monetary value of the revenue resulting from the asset recovery should come on top and in addition to the resources already available under this Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 175 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46 b (new)
(46b) Possible revenues resulting from the interest rates obtained through the use on international financial markets of the immobilised state immunities of Russia should be used for the purpose of rebuilding and reconstruction in Ukraine. Such resources come on top and in addition to the resources already available under this Facility and shall be used in the form of grants.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 176 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46 c (new)
(46c) Following the termination of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and the conclusion of court decisions on the responsibilities of the Russian state as the aggressor party, Russia will be expected to pay the reparations in order to ensure that it makes a substantial contribution to the reconstruction of Ukraine.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 178 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) The overall maximum amount for the Union support to the Facility should be at least EUR 50 billion in current prices for the period from 2024 to 2027, for all types of support. In light of the evolving circumstances and of the objectives of the Facility itself, the Union support needs to provide a balance between flexibility and programmability.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 182 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) As for the Union support, other than in the form of loans, this Regulation should be financed by and in accordance with the Ukraine Reserve, as proposed in the amendment to Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/209317 , up to EUR 50 billion for the period 2024 to 2027. Such maximum amount does not constitute the prime reference amount, within the meaning of point 18 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of December 2020 between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources, for the European Parliament and the Council during the annual budgetary procedure. _________________ 17 COM(2023)337 final.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 189 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
(60) Horizontal financial rules adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on the basis of Article 322 TFEU should apply to this Regulation. Those rules are laid down in Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and determine in particular the procedure for establishing and implementing the budget through grants, prizes, procurement, indirect management, financial instruments, budgetary guarantees, financial assistance and the reimbursement of external experts, and provide for checks on the responsibility of financial actors. To ensure fair and inclusive implementation of the Facility, Ukraine should guarantee open and timely access to the information on funding opportunities, calls for tenders and selection procedures of the personnel.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 191 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62 a (new)
(62a) The Framework agreement will also include the provisions on the public communication on the objectives of the Facility, opportunities available under the Facility, the implementation progress and the highlights on achievements. Such communication should be provided to the public in Ukraine in a form which is easily accessible, understandable and respectful of the special needs of persons with disabilities. Objective, regular and timely information on the Facility is necessary for its successful implementation and its ownership by different society groups in Ukraine. All communication efforts should be accompanied by the statements ‘Funded by the people of the European Union’ or ‘Co-funded by the people of the European Union’ next to the emblem of the Union.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 201 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) The Plan should also include an explanation of Ukraine’s system to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, corruption, fraud and conflicts of interests, when usand to effectively investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility, and the arrangements that aim to avoid double funding from the Facility and other Union programmes as well as other donors. Measures under the Plan should, where appropriate, contribute to ensuring an efficient management and control system. Such measures should be implemented by Ukraine by an indicative date which could be set, as appropriate depending on each measure, over the course of the lifetime of the Facility. The Plan should also contain provisions on fair competition during public tender procedures. It should as well display the modalities to mark the projects with appropriate emblems or other distinctive signs, so as to highlight the role of this Facility in their implementation.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 202 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) The Plan should also include an detailed explanation of Ukraine’s system along with specific measures to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, corruption and notably grand corruption, fraud and conflicts of interests, when using the funds provided under the Facility, and the arrangements that aim to avoid double funding from the Facility and other Union programmes as well as other donors. Measures under the Plan should, where appropriate, contribute to ensuring an efficient management and control system. Such measures should be implemented by Ukraine by an indicative date which could be set, as appropriate depending on each measure, over the course of the lifetime of the Facility. Compliance with this plan will be instrumental to both preserve the financial interests of the Union and integrate the acquis communautaire into Ukraine's internal legal order, which will actively bring Ukraine closer to EU membership.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 206 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 73
(73) Given the uncertainties and the need for flexibility in the implementation of the Facility, it should be possible for Ukraine to make a reasoned request to the Commission to make a proposal to amend the Council implementing decision, where the Ukraine Plan, including relevant qualitative and quantitative steps, is no longer achievable by Ukraine, either partially or totally, because of objective circumstances related to the war. The Commission may, in agreement with Ukraine, also make a proposal to amend the Council implementing decision, in particular to take into account a change of the amounts available. Ukraine should also be able to make a reasoned request to amend the Plan, including by proposing addenda where relevant, to take into account additional funding available from other donors or from other sources, such as revenue generated on frozen and immobilised Russian assets.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 209 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
(78) It is important to guarantee both flexibility and programmability as well as stability in providing Union support to Ukraine. For that purpose, payments under the Facility should occur according to a fixed quarterly schedule, subject to availability of funding, based on a payment request submitted by Ukraine and following verification by the Commission of the satisfactory fulfilment of the relevant conditions. In case a condition is not fulfilled in accordance with the indicative timeline set in the decision approving the Plan, the Commission should deduct from the payment an amount corresponding to those conditions. The disbursement of the corresponding withheld funds could take place during the nexa subsequent payment window and up to twelve months after the original deadline set out in the indicative timeline, provided the conditions have been fulfilled.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 213 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
(81) Transparency in the implementation of the Facility is an important requirement of Union support. Ukraine should publish twice a year data on persons and entities receiving amounts of funding exceeding the equivalent of EUR 500 000 for the implementation of reforms and investments specified in the Ukraine Plan. The information should not be published where disclosure risks threatening the rights and freedoms of the persons or entities concerned or seriously harming the commercial interests of the recipients. The framework agreement should include precise rules and a timeframe on the collection of data by Ukraine and the access for the Commission and OLAF, OLAF and, where applicable, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), including as regards the format of the information.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 215 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 82
(82) Under pillar II of the Facility, an investment framework should be set up, aiming to support recovery and reconstruction investments undertaken by the state, private sector companies, municipalities, state-owned enterprises or other actors. The Ukraine Investment Framework should address priorities identified in the Ukraine Plan, and support its objectives and its implementation. The Ukraine Investment Framework should involve Ukrainian authorities in its governance.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 222 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87
(87) In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, Regulation (EU, Euratom) 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95, (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and (EU) 2017/1939 and Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the financial interests of the Union are to be protected by means of proportionateffective measures, including measures relating to the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of irregularities, fraud, corruption, conflict of interest, double funding, to the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used. , and measures to effectively investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 224 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87 a (new)
(87a) Whereas, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor Office is competent in respect of the criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union, even if the main criminal conduct takes place outside the European Union, subject to extraterritorial jurisdiction of a participating EPPO Member State over an offence affecting the Union’s financial interests (such as when the damage takes place on its territory; when the offence is committed by an EU official; or by a national or a permanent resident of the participating Member State; or the offence is committed for the benefit of a legal person established in its territory), it is essential, in accordance with Article 24(1) of that Regulation, that the European Commission, the Audit Board and OLAF report to the EPPO, without undue delay, any criminal conduct affecting the funds awarded under this Regulation, with a view to EPPO assessing its competence and, if appropriate, initiating an investigation. It is furthermore essential that Ukrainian competent authorities treat, without delay, mutual legal assistance requests and extradition requests issued by EPPO and Member States’ competent authorities in relation to these funds, in accordance with relevant instruments concerning international cooperation in criminal matters.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 226 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 88
(88) In particular, in accordance with Regulations (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) should be in a position to carry out administrative investigations, including on- the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to detecting and establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union and to reporting any criminal conduct to the European Public Prosecutor Office, in accordance with Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 229 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 89
(89) In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, the necessary rights and access should be granted to the Commission OLAF, the European Court of Auditors and, where applicable the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) where relevant, including from third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds. Ukraine should also report irregularities in relation to the use of the funds to the Commission. In addition, where applicable, the competent Ukrainian authorities should also report any criminal conduct in relation to the funds to the EPPO.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 236 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91
(91) The Commission should ensure that the financial interests of the Union are effectively protected under the Facility. To this end, an independent Audit Board should be set up to provide the Commission with information on possible mismanagement of funds. The Audit Board should be subject to the reporting obligations to EPPO, in accordance with Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939. Such information should be made available to OLAF, EPPO and where appropriate to the relevant Ukrainian authorities, in particular the Accounting Chamber of the Verkhovna Rada. The Commission, with the assistance of the Union delegation, should be entitled to perform checks on how Ukraine implements funds along the whole project life cycle. The Audit Board should ensure regular dialogue and cooperation with the European Court of Auditors.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 240 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91 a (new)
(91a) Following recommendation 3 of the ECA Special Report on Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine2a and to ensure that the financial support provided under the Facility does not perpetuate or reinforce distorsions to the proper functioning of the market, the Commission should be responsible for establishing, in close cooperation with the Ukrainian authorities, a register of companies under oligarchic influence and identified as potentially hampering free and fair competition on the market. Entities identified on this register should not be eligible to receive funds under the Facility. This register will be prepared within six months of the entry into force of the present regulation, and updated quarterly. _________________ 2a ECA special report 23/2021: "Reducing grand corruption in Ukraine: several EU initiatives, but still insufficient results"
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 241 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 92
(92) While it is primarily the responsibility of Ukraine to ensure that the Facility is implemented in compliance with applicable standards, taking into account the principle of proportionality and the specific conditions under which the Facility will operate, the Commission should be able to receive sufficient assurance from Ukraine in that regard. To that end, Ukraine should commit in the Plan to improve its current management and control system and to recovering amounts misused. Ukraine should also commit in the Plan to improve detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility. In that regard, Ukraine should commit to ensure that the competent Ukrainian authorities would treat, without delay, mutual legal assistance requests and extradition requests issued by the EPPO and Member States’ competent authorities.Ukraine should establish a monitoring system feeding into an annual progress report. Ukraine should collect data and information allowing the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities, fraud, corruption and conflicts of interests, in relation to the measures supported byand allowing to effectively investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility. The framework agreement and the financing and loan agreements should provide for the obligations of Ukraine to ensure the collection of, and access to, adequate data and information on persons and entities receiving funding for the implementation of measures of the Ukraine Plan.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 249 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 97
(97) The Commission should assess each year the implementation of support under the Ukraine Facility. It should allow the Committee established by this Regulation to have adequate information to assist the Commission. This information shall also be made availabe to the European Parliament. For the effective monitoring of implementation, Ukraine should report once a year in an annual progress report on the implementation. Such reports prepared by the government should be appropriately reflected in the Ukraine Plan. Proportionate reporting requirements should be imposed on recipients of Union funding implemented under the second and third pillars of the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 266 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) progressively align with Union rules, standards, policies and practices (‘acquis’) with a view to future Union membership, thereby contributing to mutual stability, security, peace, convergence towards the Union’s economic standards, prosperity and sustainability.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 271 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) rebuild and modernise infrastructure damaged by the war, such as energy infrastructure, water systems, internal and cross-border transport networks including rail, roads and bridges and border crossing points, and foster modern, improved and resilient infrastructures; restore food production capacities; help address social challenges stemming fromaggravated by the war, including for specific groups such as war veterans, Internally Displaced Persons, single parents, orphans, disabled people, minorities and other vulnerable persons; help to build inclusive and accessible communities in particular with community-based care for children and persons with disabilities; contribute to the demining effort;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 287 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) further strengthen the rule of law, democracy, the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including through promoting an independent judiciary, reinforced security, the fight against fraud, corruption, organised crime and money laundering, tax evasion and tax fraud; compliance with international law; strengthen freedom of media and academic freedom and an enabling environment for civil society; foster social dialogue; promote non-discrimination and tolerance, to ensure and strengthen respect for the rights of persons belonging to minorities and the promotion of gender equality as well as the respect for children's rights; reinforce the effectiveness of public administration and support transparency, structural reforms and good governance at all levels, including in the areas of public financial management and public procurement and State aid; reinforce fair economic competition policy; support initiatives and bodies involved in supporting and enforcing international justice in Ukraine;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 294 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) further strengthen the rule of law, democracy, the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including through promoting an independent judiciary, reinforced security, the fight against fraud, corruption and grand corruption, organised crime and money laundering, tax evasion and tax fraud; compliance with international law; strengthen freedom of media and academic freedom and an enabling environment for civil society; foster social dialogue; promote non- discrimination and tolerance, to ensure and strengthen respect for the rights of persons belonging to minorities and the promotion of gender equality; reinforce the effectiveness of public administration and support transparency, structural reforms and good governance at all levels, including in the areas of public financial management and public procurement and State aid; support initiatives and bodies involved in supporting and enforcing international justice in Ukraine;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 295 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) create the conditions for Ukrainian Internally Displace Persons and persons under temporary protection to come back home and get reintegration into the social and economic life of the country;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 296 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) create conditions for the reintegration of children and youth, including through the educational programmes supported by the EU so as to fill where necessary the educational gap resulting from the war circumstances; address the needs of young war veterans by providing opportunities for social integration and tackling war-caused traumas;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 300 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) support cross-border cooperation with EU Member States bordering with Ukraine in the areas such as trade, environment protection, fight against international crime.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 308 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Activities under the Facility shall mainstream climate change mitigation and adaptation, environmental protection, human rights, democracy, gender equality and, where relevant, disaster risk reduction, and shall support progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, promoting integrated actions that can create co-benefits and meet multiple objectives in a coherent way. They should avoid stranded assets, and shall be guided bycompatible with the principles of ‘do no harm’ and of ‘leaving no one behind’ to the best possible extent in a war-torn country, as well as by the sustainability mainstreaming approach underpinning the European Green Deal.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 313 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. In line with the principle of inclusive partnership, where appropriate, the Commission shall strive to ensure that relevant stakeholders, including local and regional authorities, social partners and civil society organisations, are duly consulted and have timely access to relevant information to allow them to play a meaningful role during the design and implementation of activities eligible for funding under this Facility, and in the related monitoring processes. For this purpose, the Commission shall encourage the efforts for more accessibility and inclusiveness of different communities in Ukraine. The Commission shall ingive particular attention to the participation of women in consultations, as well as the inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as war veterans and persons with disabilities. The Commission shall in particular promote the involvement of regional, local, urban and other public authorities, in accordance with the multi-level governance principle and taking into account a bottom-up approach. The Commission shall encourage coordination among the relevant stakeholders.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 316 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and Ukraine, shall contribute to the implementation of Union commitments to increased transparency and accountability in the delivery of assistance, including by promoting the implementation and reinforcement of internal control systems and anti-fraud policies, and by making information on the volume and allocation of assistance available through web-based databasesa single webportal, and shall ensure that data is comparable and can be easily accessed, shared and published. The data available in this webportal shall be accessible to the European Parliament and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 332 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The financial support pursuant to Chapter III in the form of a loan, shall be available for an amount of up toat least EUR 50 000 000 000 for the period from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2027.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 335 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The sum of the resources made available pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exceedbe at least EUR 50 000 000 000 for the period 2024 to 2027.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 338 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. The resources referred to in point paragraphs 1(d) and 4 may be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Facility, such as preparatory actions, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, which are required for the management of the Facility and the achievement of its objectives, in particular trainings, studies, meetings of experts, consultations with the Ukrainian authorities, conferences, consultation of stakeholders, information and communication actions, including inclusive outreach actions, and corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, insofar as they are related to the objectives of this Regulation, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information processing and exchange, corporate information technology tools, and all other technical and administrative assistance expenses incurred by the Commission for the management and costs of the Facility at headquarters and in Union delegations. Expenses may also cover the costs of other supporting activities such as quality control and monitoring of projects on the ground and the costs of peer counselling and experts for the assessment and implementation of reforms and investments.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 342 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Additional amounts received as a result of asset confiscation in the context of Russian aggression against Ukraine and relevant sanction violation shall be added to the resources referred to in Article 6. These additional amounts should contribute to the Facility and be used in the form of grants, coming on top and in addition to the resources avalable under this Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 343 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
In principle, and subject to respect for applicable rules of customary international law, the proceeds obtained from managing of assets confiscated from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, may also be received as additional amounts as external assigned revenue within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, under any relevant Union legal act to be adopted in future. The use of proceeds shall be envisaged under this Facility under the condition that it does not slow down or impede the use of confiscated assets for this Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 345 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. notes that the EU budget is the sole guarantor for the European Investment Bank’s (EIB) activity outside the EU; calls, therefore, for additional guarantees for the EIB, including for blending instruments, to allow for further EIB engagement in Ukraine, involving local and EU stakeholders.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 349 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall conclude a framework agreement with Ukraine for the implementation of the Facility setting out specific arrangements for the management, control, supervision, monitoring, evaluation, reporting and audit of funds under the Facility, as well as to prevent, investigate and correct irregularities, fraud, corruption and conflicts of interest and to effectively investigate and prosecute criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility. The framework agreement shall be complemented by financing agreements in accordance with Article 10 and loan agreements in accordance with Article 21, setting out specific provisions for the management and implementation of funding under the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 352 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the commitment of Ukraine to progress towards more efficient and effective control systems, anda robust legal framework to fight fraud by means of criminal law, more efficient and effective control systems, including appropriate mechanisms and measures to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, fraud, corruption and conflict of interests as well as to strengthen the fight against money laundering, organised crime, terrorism financing, tax avoidance, tax fraud or tax evasion;, and other illegal activities affecting the funds provided under the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 354 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the activities related to control, supervision, monitoring, evaluation, reporting and audit of Union funding under the Facility, as well as detections, investigations, prosecutions, anti- fraud measures and cooperation, including mutual legal assistance in criminal matters and extradition;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 357 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) the obligation for persons or entities implementing Union funds under the Facility to notify without delay the Audit Board, the Commission and, OLAF without delayand, where applicable, the EPPO, of suspected or actual cases of irregularities, fraud, corruption, and conflict of interests, and other illegal activities affecting the funds provided under the Facility and their follow-up;.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 360 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point h
(h) the obligations referred to in Article 33(2), including precise rules and timeframe on collection of data by Ukraine and access for the Commission and OLAF;, OLAF and, where applicable, direct reporting to the EPPO.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 397 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) an explanation of Ukraine’s system to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, fraud, corruption and conflicts of interests, when usas well as to effectively investigate and prosecute criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility, and of the arrangements that aim to avoid double funding from the Facility and other Union programmes or donors; , as well as to ensure swift judicial cooperation with competent authorities of the EU and its Member States.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 398 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) an detailed explanation of Ukraine’s system along with specific measures to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, fraud, corruption and grand corruption and conflicts of interests, when using the funds provided under the Facility, and of the arrangements that aim to avoid double funding from the Facility and other Union programmes or donors;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 403 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Ukraine Plan shall be prepared by Ukraine. Ukraine shall strive to submit the Plan to the Commission by two months after entry into force of this Regulation. At the request of the government of Ukraine, the Commission shall provide a one-time technical and administrative assistance based on already existing programmes, with the view to accelerating the preparation of the Plan. Ukraine may submit a draft Plan to the Commission.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 405 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Ukraine Plan shall be prepared by Ukraine, with the consultation of relevant committees of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Ukraine shall strive to submit the Plan to the Commission by two months after entry into force of this Regulation. Ukraine may submit a draft Plan to the Commission.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 408 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The preparation and implementation of the Ukraine Plan shall be done in consultation with regional, local, urban and other public authorities, including relevant ministerial departments, as well as civil society organisations, in accordance with the multi-level governance principle and taking into account a bottom-up approach.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 428 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) whether the arrangements proposed by Ukraine are expected to effectively prevent, detect and correct irregularities, fraud, corruption and conflicts of interests, when usas well as, to effectively investigate and prosecute criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility, and are expected to allow avoiding double funding from the Facility and other Union programmes as well as other donors.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 433 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where the Commission gives a negative assessment to the Ukraine Plan, it shall communicate a duly justified assessment within two months of the submission of the proposal by Ukraine. Following an invitation from the European Parliament, the Commission shall meet with the competent committees to inform about the reasons for the negative assessment, as well as to outline possible recommendations for the improvement and modification of the Ukraine Plan. Relevant and substantial information shall be transmitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council simultaneously and on equal terms at least five working days ahead of the meeting.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 441 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Ukraine Plan, including relevant qualitative and quantitative steps, is no longer achievable by Ukraine, either partially or totally, because of objective circumstancesand initially unforeseeable circumstances related to the war, Ukraine may propose an amended Ukraine Plan. In that case, Ukraine may make a reasoned request to the Commission to make a proposal to amend all or part of the Council implementing decision referred to in Article 19(1).
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 446 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council, simultaneously, the following elements every 6 months: (a) a general overview on the development of the debts situation in Ukraine; (b) the amount of the loan in EUR; (c) the average maturity; (d) the pricing formula, and the availability period of the loan; (e) the maximum number of instalments and a clear and precise repayment schedule.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 448 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The loan agreement shall be transmitted simultaneously to the European Parliament and the Council, as well as to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 456 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Commission concludes that Ukraine has not taken the necessary measures within a period of twelve months from the initial negative assessment referred to in paragraph 5, the Commission shall reduce the amount of the non-repayable financial support and of the loan proportionately to the part corresponding to the relevant qualitative and quantitative steps. Ukraine may present its observations within two months from the communication of the Commission’s conclusions.deleted
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 468 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall prepare, in close cooperation with the Ukrainian authorities, a register of companies under oligarchic influence identified as potentially hampering free and fair competition on the market. Entities identitied on this register will not be eligible to receive funds under the Facility. This register will be prepared within six months after the entry into force of the regulation and updated quarterly.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 470 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. The operational board of the Ukraine Investment Framework shall comprise representatives of the Commission, of each Member State, the European Parliament, and representatives of Ukraine, including representatives of the Verkhovna Rada. Counterparts implementing the Ukraine Guarantee and financial instruments supported by the Ukraine Investment Framework may be given observer status. The Commission shall chair the operational board.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 476 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. The eligible counterparts for the purposes of the Ukraine Guarantee and the eligible entrusted entities for the purpose of financial instruments shall be those identified in Article 208(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, including those from third countries contributing to the Ukraine Guarantee in accordance with Article 28 of this Regulation. In addition, by way of derogation from Article 62(1), point (c), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, bodies governed by private law of a Member State, or a third country which has contributed to the Ukraine Guarantee in accordance with Article 28 of this Regulation, and which provide adequate assurance of their financial and operational capacity shall be eligible for the purpose of the Ukraine Guarantee. Preference shall be given to those bodies that disclose information related to environment, social, tax and corporate governance criteria. For this purpose, the Commission shall create a webportal with adequate and user-friendly guidance on disclosure, comprising the examples of such disclosure.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 478 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Ukraine Guarantee shall support financing and investment operations which comply with the conditions set out in Article 209(2), points (a) to (e) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 concerning in particular the need to achieve additionality, including by addressing market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, to avoid the distortion of competition, and to maximise private investment, including also for SMEs.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 482 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The Commission may use up to 30%part of the amount referred in paragraph 1 of this Article to increase the amounts of the guarantee provided through External Action Guarantee agreements concluded pursuant to Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 subject to the following:
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 483 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) by way of derogation from the second subparagraph of Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 the operations covered by the Ukraine Guarantee under this paragraph shall constitute a separate portfolio of Ukraine Guarantee and shall not be taken into account for the purposes of calculating the 65% coverage referred to in Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/947;deleted
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 484 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5 – point d
(d) the risk sharing in the separate portfolio of the Ukraine Guarantee shall ensure alignment of interest between the Commission and the eligible counterpart in accordance with Article 209(2)(e) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and without prejudice to the second paragraph of Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/947, the counterpart shall contribute with their own resources to this portfolio in accordance with Article 219(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 485 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 9 – point a a (new)
(aa) The eligible counterparts shall also, upon request, provide the Commission with any additional information necessary to fulfil the Commission’s obligations pursuant to this Regulation, together with information regarding compliance with anti-fraud and anti-corruption provisions, human rights, and social, labour and environment standards.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 486 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 10
10. The condition set out in Article 219(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 on contributions with own resources shall apply to each eligible counterpart allocated with a budgetary guarantee under the Ukraine Investment Framework on a portfolio basis and, in the case of the European Investment Bank, the own resources contribution shall be understood as the assumption of residual risk.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 487 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. The EIB shall implement an exclusive dedicated investment window covering a comprehensive risk cover for operations with sovereign counterparts and non-commercial sub-sovereign counterparts with an indicative signature volume of EUR 5.5bn. The EIB shall have the exclusivity for operations with sovereign counterparts and non- commercial sub-sovereign counterparts under the exclusive dedicated investment window. Under it, the own resources contribution shall be understood as the assumption of residual risk and the EU guarantee shall cover 65 % of the aggregate amount disbursed and guaranteed under EIB financing operations, less amounts reimbursed, plus all related amounts. By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, if the EIB cannot carry out or decides not to carry out operations under the exclusive dedicated investment window, the implementation of these operations shall be open to other eligible counterparts, in accordance with conditions which shall be laid down in the relevant External Action Guarantee agreements, which shall take into account the conditions offered to the EIB for the same type of operations and the specific needs, circumstances and nature of the eligible counterpart implementing these operations.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 488 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. The exclusive dedicated investment window shall be realised by an increase according to Art. 30.5 of the signature volume for operations in Ukraine of the guarantee agreement concluded pursuant to Article 36 and 38 of Regulation (EU) 2021/947.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 493 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Assistance under this Chapter shall also support confidence-building measures and processes that promote justice, truth- seeking, reparations as well as collection of evidence of crimes committed during the war. Funding for initiatives and bodies involved in supporting and enforcing international justice in Ukraine may be provided under this Chapter. The findings retrieved as a result of such measures shall be brought to the knowledge of the Commission, the Parliament and the Council with a view to be considered during the elaboration of the Union's foreign policy positions.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 496 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. Assistance under this Chapter shall support the creation and strengthening of Ukrainian authorities responsible for ensuring appropriate use of funds and effective fight against mismanagement of public funding, in particular fraud, corruption and grand corruption, conflict of interests and irregularities incurred in relation to any amount spent to achieve the objectives of the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 498 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. In implementing the Facility, the Commission and Ukraine shall take all the appropriate measures to protect the financial interests of the Union, taking into account the principle of proportionality and the specific conditions under which the Facility will operate, the precondition set out in Article 5(1) and conditions set out in the framework agreement and specific financing or loan agreements, in particular regarding the prevention, detection and correction of fraud, corruption, conflicts of interests and irregularities. Ukraine shall commit to progressing towards effective and efficient management and control systems and ensure that amounts wrongly paid or incorrectly used can be recovered, as well as investigation and prosecution of criminal offences affecting the funds provided under the Facility. Ukraine shall commit to progressing towards a robust legal framework to fight fraud by means of criminal law, effective and efficient management and control systems and ensure that amounts wrongly paid or incorrectly used can be recovered. Ukraine shall also commit to ensure that the competent Ukrainian authorities treat, without delay, mutual legal assistance requests and extradition requests by the EPPO and Member States’ competent authorities concerning criminal offences affecting the funds under the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 499 #

2023/0200(COD)

(a) to regularly check that the financing provided has been used in accordance with the applicable rules, in particular regarding the prevention, detection and correction of fraud, corruption, conflicts of interests and irregularities or any other illegal activity affecting the Union’s financial interests, as well as the availability of the reporting tools and protection of whistle-blowers;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 501 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to take appropriate measures to prevent, detect and correct fraud, corruption, conflicts of interests and irregularities, as well as to investigate and prosecute criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union, to avoid double funding and to take legal actions to recover funds that have been misappropriated, including in relation to any measure for the implementation of reforms and investment projects under the Ukraine Plan; and to take appropriate measures to treat mutual legal assistance requests and extradition requests by the EPPO and Member States’ competent authorities concerning criminal offences affecting the funds under the Facility, without delay;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 507 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) to expressly authorise the Commission, OLAF, and the Court of Auditors and, where applicable, EPPO to exert their rights as provided for in Article 129(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046, in application of the principle of proportionality. Where applicable, the competent Ukrainian authorities shall report any criminal conduct affecting the funds under the Facility to the EPPO.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 512 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall strive to make available to Ukraine an integrated and interoperable information and monitoring system including a single data- mining and risk-scoring tool to access and analyse the relevant data, including the data listed in paragraph 2(d). Where such a system is available, Ukraine shall use and feed the relevant data into the system, including with support referred to under Chapter V.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 514 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5
5. Persons and entities implementing funds under the Facility shall report any suspected or actual cases, of fraud, corruption, conflict of interests and irregularities or other illegal activities affecting financial interests of the Union without delay, to the Audit Board referred to in Article 34, the Commission and OLAF,OLAF, and, where applicable, the EPPO.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 515 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Persons and entities implementing funds under the Facility, as well as persons knowledgeable about the implementation process, shall be able to report the cases of alledged corruption, fraud, irregularities and maladministration through a dedicated digital tool, with the relevant whistleblower protection provisions.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 519 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 3
3. The Audit Board shall exercise its functions in complete objectivity and operate in compliance with best applicable international practices and standards. It shall act without prejudice to the powers of the Commission, OLAF, the Court of Auditors and, where applicable, the EPPO.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 522 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 4
4. The Audit Board shall ensure regular dialogue and cooperation with the European Court of Auditors, as well as the Audit Chamber of Verkhovna Rada.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 524 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In accordance with Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the Audit Board shall report to the European Public Prosecutor Office any criminal conduct in respect of which the latter could exercise its competence.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 527 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
The reports of, and information from, the Audit Board shall also be sent to OLAF and, where applicable, to the EPPO, and may be shared with the relevant Ukrainian authorities, especially in case they need to take steps to prevent, detect and correct fraud, corruption, conflict of interests and irregularities, as well as to investigate and prosecute criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 51 #

2023/0135(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point f a (new)
(fa) When a national official is convicted of a criminal offense under this Directive, the conviction by national judicial authorities shall trigger a comprehensive assessment of the entire wealth associated with that official, as well as their close relatives and partners. This assessment encompasses all financial assets, movable and immovable properties, with the purpose of determining whether the wealth held by the official, relatives, or partners corresponds to the income officially reported by these individuals. In cases where a significant disparity exists between the reported income and the actual assets possessed by the national official or their affiliated individuals, national competent authorities shall initiate a distinct investigation into the matter. If this separate investigation reveals that the assets in question are unexplained wealth or the proceeds of illicit activities, such assets should be subject to seizure and confiscation by national authorities.
2023/10/18
Committee: CONT
Amendment 203 #

2023/0053(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) It should be ensured that personal data processing for the implementation of this Directive complies with the data protection framework of the Union, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council53 and the Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council53a. __________________ 53 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). 53a Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37-47.
2023/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 217 #

2023/0053(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 b (new)
(15b) Active mobility, covering walking, use of bicycles, electric bikes or scooters, is becoming increasingly popular given the green transition. As their users are more frequently entering the European roads and sharing them with other individual means of transport where a driving licence is required, Member States are encouraged to introduce in their scholar systems risk awareness and traffic rules trainings, also within their lifelong training, with the view to improve road safety. Member States should be encouraged to introduce further measures for users of personal mobility vehicles with a view to decrease traffic accidents, improve road safety rules and risk awareness. Member States should equally consider possible registration of micro mobility vehicles above certain speed and power.
2023/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 298 #

2023/0053(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, upon request of the applicant, Member States shall provide for the opportunity to issue the driving licence which was initially resigned from. This physical or mobile driving licence shall be provided without due delay and not later than within 2 weeks from the date of the request made by the applicant.
2023/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 540 #

2023/0053(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) in the case of a vehicle category C and C1, has undergone a dedicated 7- hour training course to learn the necessary professional and pedagogical skills, as part of their periodic CPC training.
2023/09/25
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the original idea behindconclusion of the Conference on the Future of Europe as regards citizens’ information and participation in democracy at Union level, aiming at making the Union more understandable and accessibla watershed moment for European democracy and a precedent for citizens’ participation in the Union's decision- making process for the years to come;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that citizens have identified at the Conference that the technological revolution and geopolitical upheaval pose new transnational challenges which are to be addressed; points out that for citizens to understand the added value of the Union, the European institutions need to be empowered to act more effectively;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2022/2051(INL)

1 b. Recalls the joint commitment by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to listen to Europeans and to follow up on the recommendations made by the Conference on the Future of Europe;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that manysome of the proposals endorsadopted by the Conference on the Future of Europe do not require Treaty change but instead call for the strengthening of existing policies and instruments; takes the view that the division of competences provided for in the Treaties, and in particular Articles 4 and 5 Tstresses that others can only be implemented through a substantial amendment of the Treaties, inter alia, concerning the simplification of the institutional architecture of the Union, more transparency and accountability in the decision-making process and a new reflection on Union competences, such as health and healthcare, defence, education, application of fundamental rights and citizenship; takes the view that these proposals together indicate a clear demand and mandate for an urgent and deep reform of the Union’s architecture and decision-making procedures; underlines that this reform necessarily includes a substantial amendment of the Treaties per Article 48 TFEU,; should remain unchangedtates that many of the petitions sent to the Parliament address situations that could be improved if those changes were made;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 2
2. Calls therefore for the revision of the TFEU, in particular its Title II, to ensure that the Union is able to react agilely and effectively to challenges and to achieve better democratic accountability of the Union budget, notably by reinforcinggiving to Parliament’s role in full budgetary decision- making and scrutinypowers;
2023/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Commission to include in its set of concrete actions to deliver on the Conference proposals the consolidation of a European Citizenship Statute providing citizen-specific rights and freedoms, which would make the European values and rights more tangible for citizens of the Union;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 15 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes that several petitioners complain about violations of fundamental rights because they do not find sufficient protection in their Member States; regrets that the Charter of Fundamental Rights only deploys its protection when rights are violated in application of EU law; states that this restriction leads to situations of impunity and places the most vulnerable sectors of the population, such as minors, in a situation of greater vulnerability; recalls that European citizens and the institutions have spoken out at the Conference on the Future of Europe and expressed their willingness to lift this restriction in order to make the Charter universally applicable; asks the Commission to include this proposal in the set of concrete actions to deliver on the Conference proposals; states that the Charter should be a universal mechanism which, under certain conditions, prevents national authorities from undermining the democratic principles and values enshrined in the Treaties;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the right to petition is a citizen’s right which should plays a fundamental role as a direct participatory democracy tool in the Union’s decision- making; recalls that petitions can be used as means of creating opportunities for public debate and of initiating and evaluating policy and legislative changes; calls on the Member States and the Commission to do their utmost toall actors involved in the Treaty reform procedure to seize the occasion to strengthen citizens' participation in the Union's decision-making as well as the right to petition, inter alia by ensureing that petitions are given adequately followed up by the Union institutions; stresses that citizens themselves should have a substantial say in said Treaty reform procedure;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 26 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. NoteRegrets that the right to petition remains underused at Union level when compared with the situation, as underpinned by Articles 10 and 11 TEU and Articles 24 and 227 TEU, remains underused at Unational level; recalls, also, that about a quarter of the petitions submitted to the European Parliament are declared inadmissible, mainly because the matter falls outside the Union’s fields of activity, which points out the lack of understanding, among Union citizens, of the Union’s remit of competen; therefore calls to assess the division of competences set forth in the Treaties and more clearly define the Union’s remit so that the right to petition can be more effectively implemented in practice;
2022/10/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 31 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point 4
4. Article 311 TFEU shall be amended so that the decision laying down the provisions relating to the system of own resources of the Union and the implementing measures for that system are adopted by the Council acting by qualified majority after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament on the one hand, and the implementing measures of the Own Resources Decision being adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, on the other hand;
2023/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, since the adoption of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) in December 2020, the political, economic and social context has changevolved beyond recognition, startincluding with the unprecedented scale and dramatic consequences of the continued COVID-19 pandemic, which is far fromnot over yet;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 22 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas citizens rightly expect thea bigger EU budget to respond effectively to evolving needs and to better support them in crises;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the combined effect of multiple crises and, low MFF ceilings and cumbersome rules applying to any MFF review or revision has given rise to a ‘galaxy’ of ad hoc instruments beyond the EU budget, as well as greater use of external assigned revenue not subject to the budgetary procedure, most notably in the case of NextGenerationEU; whereas, as one arm of the budgetary authority, Parliament should play a full role in this new budgetary environment in order to ensure democratic accountability and transparency;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 44 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the central role that the EU budget must plays in delivering on the Union’s political priorities, including making a success of the green and digital transitions, fostering an inclusive and social recovery, promoting growth, strategic autonomy and energy independence, providing support for small and medium-sized enterprises, fostering sustainable development that leaves no one behind and ensures cohesion and upward convergence, ensuring a more robust European Health Union in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, promoting the rule of law, EU values and fundamental rights, contributing to greater opportunities for all, and ensuring a stronger Union for its people and in the world;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 58 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Asks therefore the Commission to consider putting forward a legislative proposal establishing a temporary instrument outside the MFF for the mutualisation of war-related costs ("Ukrainian crisis Adjustment Reserve"), that would be aimed to support the most affected Member States;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the decision to grant Ukraine and Moldova candidate country status and a membership perspective to Georgia; emphasises that this decision entails a long-term financial and budgetary commitment to supporting the necessary reforms specific to each country, as has been the case with other candidate countries, as well as to reconstruction and recovery;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 69 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that the EU budget should play a role in the reconstruction and recovery of Ukraine once the war is over, along with contributions by Member States and other international partners and Russian war reparations;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 72 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that essential new policy initiatives put forward since the adoption of the current MFF have come with proposals to shift money away from key EU policies and objectives that actually pay for the collateral damages of the recent crises; considers that recurrent redeployments are not a viable way to finance Union’s priorities;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 81 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the extensive use made of the special instruments in the first two years of the MFF; notes that the Flexibility Instrument was mobilised for Heading 6 spending in 2022 and points to the proposal that it beCommission’s proposal in the Amending Letter 1/2023 that it will be significantly mobilised for spending under both Headings 62b, 5 and 76 in 2023; points out that, under the defence proposal of July 202218 , further appropriations are to be mobilised via special instruments in 2023 andalso in 2024; _________________ 18 Proposal of 19 July 2022 for a regulation on establishing the European defence industry Reinforcement through common Procurement Act (COM(2022)0349).
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 83 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights that the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR) was almost exhausted in 2021 and is projected to be fully exhausted in 2022 after having provided a combination of humanitarian aid and support to Member States for tackling natural and man-made disasters; points out that the extension of the scope of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to include public health emergencies, coupled with the increased scale and frequency of natural disasters, the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine and the resulting arrival of large numbers of refugees in the EU, has placed the SEAR under extreme strain; expects, further, that the dramatic consequences of the unprecedented wildfires in the summer of 2022 will require significant financial support, including from the SEAR;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 87 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises, therefore, that the 2021-2027 MFF is already being pushed to its limits less than two years after its adoption, a situation aggravated by the unforeseeable events of 2022; points out that it is simply not equipped, in terms of size, structure or rules, to respond to a multitude of crises of this scale, nor to adequately finance new shared EU policy ambitions and the swift implementation of the requisite EU-wide solutions; is very concerned, in this regard, about the ability from the European Union to respond to any future unknown crises that might happen by 2027;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 94 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the MFF is increased annually on the basis of a 2 % deflator applied to 2018 prices; underlines that spiralling energy prices and extreme energy market volatility caused mainly by Russia’s decision to cut gas supply have been feeding soaring inflation, with severe impacts on citizens, businesses and consumers; is deeply concerned that such unexpectedly high levels of inflation are placing the MFF under severe strain and reducing its purchasing power further, in a context where its overall level is already lower than previous MFFs in terms of share of the EU GDP; stresses that, in practice, this means that fewer Union projects and actions can be funded, thereby negatively impacting beneficiaries;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 98 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls, further, that, despite Parliament’s demands that the European Union Recovery Instrument (EURI) be placed over and above the ceilings, the refinancing costs are repaid from within the MFF ceilings, exerting further pressure on the MFF, especially and requiring the use of special instruments in 2023, in a context of rising interest rates and increasing NGEU borrowing costs;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 99 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Observes the continuing demand for the EU budget to serve as a guarantee for additional necessary macro-financial assistance (MFA), especially for Ukraine; welcomes the EU support in this regard; notes, however, that the higher risks of default and the large amount at stake entail significant contingent liabilities;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 106 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Concludes that, in this context, the need for an urgent review and revision of the MFF is beyond any doubt and that a ‘business as usual’ approach will not remotely suffice to tackle the array of challenges posed and could thereby undermine confidence in the Union in the short, medium and long term;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 130 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines that the unanimity requirement for adoption of the MFF Regulation impedes the necessary decisions in the revision process; calls, in that regard, on the European Council to activate the passerelle clause set out in Article 312(2) TFEU to allow for adoption of the MFF Regulation by qualified majority; recalls its proposals that the ordinary legislative procedure be applied for the adoption of the MFF Regulation;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 142 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Strongly supports the use of the Regulation on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the EU budget (the Conditionality Regulation); believes that its entry into force had a general deterrent effect on nationals authorities planning to breach the rule of law with EU funds; regrets its long- overdue application by the Commission in case of Hungary; commits to do whatever it can to ensure the respect of the provisions of the Regulation and their effective implementation; emphasises the clear link between respect for the rule of law and the efficient implementation of the EU budget; notes that any upscaling of the 2021-2027 MFF should aim to reinforce the protection of the rule of law and EU’s financial interests; underlines that the Conditionality Regulation aims first and foremost at protecting the EU budget rather than the rule of law; asks the Commission to assess how the Regulation could be improved to allow the EU to suspend EU funds whenever there are breaches of the rule of law in Member States in order to ensure the full respect of Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 150 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Reaffirms its long-standing position that new political initiatives must be financed with additional fresh money and not to the detriment of well-established, pre-existing Union programmes or policies; strongly criticizes the systematic use of redeployments and the relabelling of existing programmes to finance new initiatives(“budgetwashing”);
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 162 #

2022/2046(INI)

18. Highlights that many of the policy ambitions recently stated – notably in the fields of energy and strategic and industrial autonomy – and the new policy initiatives since January 2021 (Chips Act, Secure Connectivity, Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority) imply spending under Heading 1; opposes the use of agreed programme envelopes to finance new initiatives and believes that the margins are insufficient to accommodate the greater long-term needs; calls, therefore, for an increase in the ceiling of Heading 1;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 165 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Welcomes, in this regard, the announcement made by the Commission President in her State of the Union address on 14 September 2022, calling for the establishment of a European Sovereignty Fund; shares Commission’s concerns over the EU’s dependencies on non-EU countries, as it is the case for energy, critical industrial items, fertilisers, raw materials, chemicals and other key products for the European economy; commits to critically assess any proposal to make sure it responds to real needs and provides fresh means; calls in this regard for the establishment of a new dedicated Fund to secure the strategic autonomy of the Union by financing cross-border energy infrastructure, renewable energy production and energy efficiency, as well as supporting space, cybersecurity, key industrial sectors, the circular economy, food security, new partnerships, production of critical chemicals and raw materials; insists that any such new fund should be established according to the ordinary legislative procedure and function under the full oversight of the European Parliament and with direct management by the Commission; emphasises that its overall amount should be established on the basis of a clear assessment of the costs and investment gaps; asks all of it to be based on lessons learnt from NGEU and be presented with the upcoming MFF revision in 2023;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 170 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Regrets that, contrary to Parliament’s position, it was decidedcalls that the costs of EURI borrowing and the repayment of debt bare included as a budget line under Heading 2b, alongside flagship programmes such as Erasmus+, EU4Health, and Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values; stresses nevertheless that interest costs and debt repayment depend on market developments, are not discretionary spending, do not follow the logic of caps on spending and should never compete with programmes under the same ceiling; recalls that any activation of the Emergency Support Instrument also depends on the availability of an unallocated margin under the ceiling of this heading; reminds that this decision was taken for the 2021-2027 period only, without prejudice to future negotiations; insists, therefore, that the status quo presents significant risks to programme spending and that the repayment line be removed from Heading 2b and counted over and above the MFF ceilings;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 182 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its position that the Social Climate Fund must be fully incorporated into the EU budget and within the MFF, without negatively impacting other programmes and funds under this heading, bearing in mind the importance of ensuring food security and delivering on the Green Deal; calls for the ceiling of Heading 3 to be adjusted accordingly; calls on the Council to move forward with the targeted MFF revision as soon as possible to integrate the Social Climate Fund into the MFF; reminds the other arm of the budgetary authority its obligation to respect budget unity;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 193 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights that the necessary spending to enhance defence cooperation and investment cannot solely be covered within the ceiling of Heading 5; calls for the ceiling to be increased in line with needswelcomes the Commission’s upcoming proposal for a European defence investment programme (EDIP) in view of introducing joint procurement and life cycle management of military capabilities; calls for the ceiling to be increased in line with needs; considers, in this regard, that savings could be made thanks to a mutualisation of defence spending between the Member States at the EU level;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 198 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Deplores the fact that, even prior to the war against Ukraine, funds available under Heading 6 were woefully inadequate and that pressure has since increased substantially; underlines that the continued funding for the needs of refugees from Syria, Iraq and other countries was not factored into the MFF or NDICI-Global Europe negotiations and should therefore have been financed by fresh appropriations with a corresponding increase in the ceiling of Heading 6; highlights that, owing to the risk of default on MFA loans provided to Ukraine, a far higher rate of provisioning than the standard 9 % is likely to be required as further loans are rolled out, rather than redeployments; highlights that a far higher rate of provisioning than the standard 9 % is required for MFA loans provided to Ukraine as further loans are rolled out following the higher risk of default due to the war imposed by Russia; underlines that additional needs in Ukraine must not lead to money being diverted away from other geographic regions in need; insists, therefore, on an increase in the ceiling for Heading 6 to fully cover the current and projected future needs of the Union’s external action, which have dramatically increased both in neighbouring countries, especially in Ukraine, and worldwide as a result of the food, energy and economic crises;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 217 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that the MFF revision must not lead to any downwards revision of the pre-allocated national envelopes; emphasises the fact that the late agreement on the MFF for 2021-2027 and on the cohesion policy package, coupled with the COVID-19 crisis, led to a slow start to the programming process, but not because of the policy itself even though more administrative simplification is strongly needed; underlines that the delayed start does not in any way call into question the pivotal role and added value of cohesion policy as the essential Union investment policy and convergence instrument;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 222 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls that payment appropriations flow directly from commitments and recalls, therefore, that any increase in the ceilings for commitments per heading will have to be accompanied by a correspondinglative increase in the ceiling for payments for the same or subsequent years;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 250 #

2022/2046(INI)

29. Stresses that, while crisis response measures are necessary and useful, cohesion policy is not a crisis response tool; is concerned that cohesion policy is increasingly being used to reinforce other policies and to make up for shortcomings in budgetary flexibility or crisis response mechanisms in the MFF; emphasises that cohesion policy is one of the priorities of the Union, has long-term investment objectives linked to the EU’s strategic agenda, in particular the European Green Deal and the Digital Agenda, and should not be used to replenish funding for other policies; calls, therefore, for cohesion funding levels to be preserved in the budget along with common agricultural policy;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 259 #

2022/2046(INI)

31. Considers that the special instruments are constrained both by scarcity of resources and rigidity of design, hampering their ability to serve as effective crisis response tools; stresses, therefore, that the revision is imperative in broadening the potential of the existing flexibility provisions; criticises in particular the Council’s decision, despite Parliament’s warnings, to mergeonsiders that the merging of the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) and the EUSF in the current MFF has led to shortcomings, while reducing the overall funding available;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 261 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Calls for annual appropriations for the Flexibility Instrument to be increased from EUR 915 million to EUR 2 billion; calls, in addition, for the SEAR to be split into two strands – the EAR and the EUSF – and for annual appropriations to be increased from EUR 1.2 billion for the SEAR overall to EUR 1 billion for each strand in 2018 prices; considers that this will provide vital additional resources to respond to current and emerging needs;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 272 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Insists that, beyond a reinforcement of the existing special instruments, it is necessary to establish a permanent fiscal capacity for the Euro Area and common crisis instrument as an additional permanent special instrument over and above the MFF ceilings so that the EU budget can better adapt and quickly react to crises and their social and economic effects;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 281 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Insists that decommitted appropriations should remain in the budge, fines not used for EU programmes top-ups in 2021-2027 and penalties should accrue to the crisis instrument so as to provide additional budgetary flexibility; underlines the need for corresponding changes to the Financial Regulation;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 286 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Underlines that many of the shortcomings and inadequacies in the current MFF are inherent in its logic and design, where predictability of spending drives decisions on structure and amounts and curbs flexibility; regrets the high tensions the MFF negotiations trigger due to its nature;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 290 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37 a. Regrets the decrease of the EU budget in terms of percentage to the EU GDP over the last decades; considers that capping the EU budget at roughly 1% of the EU GDP as a rule impedes the EU from fulfilling its increasing tasks; calls on the Member States to take decisions based on needs instead of dogmas;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 301 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Deplores, however, the repeated use of off-budget instruments, in particular under Article 122 TFEU, which runs counter to citizens’ interests, as this frustrates oversight, accountability and the transparency of public spending; considers, in that regard, than an annual plenary debate in Parliament on all EU finances, including off-budget instruments, will be an important step towards enhancing transparency and accountability;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 304 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Stresses, in this context, that the trend towards increased use of external assigned revenue is not a satisfactory solution as it weakens the role of the budgetary authority (Parliament and the Council), thereby negatively impacting democratic scrutiny and reducing the transparency of the EU’s finances; demands legally sound solutions that allow for targeted, one-off or needs-based top- ups that display the same advantages as earmarkxternal assigned revenue (i.e. not counted against the ceilings), but that are at the same time subject to full control of the budgetary authority; reminds its strong commitment to the universality principle;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 308 #

2022/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on the Commission, furthermore, to begin a longer-term reflection on the EU budget post-2027 in the light of evolving spending needs and building on the work of the Conference on the Future of Europe with respect to own resources and the budget; insists that the successor to the current MFF be equipped to deal fully and flexibly with a range of policy priorities and spending needs and to ensure resilience in the event of crises; asks the Commission to review the whole architecture of the MFF, including through an assessment of the suitability of a long-term programming framework for all EU programmes and of the duration of programming periods of seven years;
2022/10/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2022/2032(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the key role of cohesion policy in fostering economic, social and territorial convergence across the EU; expresses concern, however, about persistent inequalities, socio-economic disparities and uneven demographic decline, with many less developed regions falling behind and getting caught in a ‘development trap’ in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic; highlights that the current influx of Ukrainian refugees disproportionately affects the bordering Member States, leading to the risk of further deepening the divide in socio- economic disparities among Member States;
2022/05/25
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 25 #

2022/2032(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the time-limited nature of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has prompted Member States to prioritise the implementation of the national recovery and resilience plans; highlights the need to ensure complementarities and synergies between cohesion policy, the RRF and other policy instruments, to ensure maximum impact; underlines that technical assistance remains crucial for the implementation of cohesion funds; calls therefore on the Commission to increase its presence on the ground and prioritise technical assistance in cases where the project implementation is delayed;
2022/05/25
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2022/2032(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Highlights that cohesion policy spending is still subject to irregular activities, linked to corruption and fraud; calls on the Commission to reinforce financial and personnel resources of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), in order to complete the investigations and the recovery of misused funds;
2022/05/25
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2022/2032(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the flexibility introduced through the Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe (CARE) proposals to help Member States deal with the impact of the war in Ukraine, following the model of the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives, CRII and CRII+; underlines, however, that cohesion policy funding must primarily serve its long-term policy objectives and not become a source of financing to make up for shortcomings in budgetary flexibility or crisis response mechanisms within the MFF.; calls therefore on the Commission to establish, as a matter of urgency, a dedicated new fund for the financial assistance to the responsible authorities and NGOs dealing with Ukrainian refugees in the EU Member States, with a specific focus on the Member States absorbing the biggest part of the refugees flow, such as Poland, Romania, Slovakia; highlights that a co- financing rate of 100% should be maintained for the support to the hosting entities and families, so as to alleviate the burden for the households hosting the refugees;
2022/05/25
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 45 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. urges the Commission, especially in view of the next European elections in 2024, to work with Member States in the European Cooperation Network on Elections to guarantee the democratic rights of people with disabilities, including people with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities, by ensuring that voting procedures, materials and facilities are easy to access and participation in public and political life are actively promoted;
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 67 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls, in this respect, that the COVID-19 crisis has fostered remote work, which could provide for wider access to employment for PwD, and urges the Member States to take serious measures to tackle unemployment and the payment gap in particular for women with disabilities11 ; _________________ 11 Petitions Nos 0608/2020, 1139/2021, 0226/21 and 0070/2022.
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 82 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. calls on those Member States which still segregate students to provide sufficient financial and specialized support for inclusive education in schools, third level education and in programmes (including Erasmus+, Discover EU & European Solidarity Corps);
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 95 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights that PwD are exposed to discrimination most frequently, in particular those with intellectual, psychosocial and mental disabilities, and women and girls, migrants and members of the LGBTIQ community with disabilities; calls, in this respect, for anti-discrimination legislation to protect the rights of PwD and for the horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive to be unblocked in the Council14 and ensure adequate follow-up of the European Framework for Action on Mental Health and Wellbeing and improve the EU Compass for Action on Mental wellbeing; _________________ 14 Petitions Nos 0164/2020 and 0226/2021.
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 100 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses the need to harmonise the recognition of disability status among the Member States; calls on the Commission to extend the scope of the EU disability card to secure freedom of movement for people with disabilities;
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 105 #

2022/2026(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the obligations under the CRPD and the recommendations of the CRPD Committee are also binding on all EU institutions, which are responsible for ensuring accessibility and non- discrimination, including for EU staff with disabilities and carers of PwD.; furthermore urges EU institutions to take the necessary measures to guarantee that people with disabilities can follow interpretation and easily access all online documents and underlines that in particular the Petitions Portal should be more accessible;
2022/06/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas in 2021, the number of users supporting one or more petitions on Parliament’s Petitions Web Portal was 209 272, which represents a very considerable increase from the 48 882 users recorded in 2020; whereas the number of clicks in support of petitions also increased in 2021, reaching a total of 217 876 (up from 55 129 in 2020); whereas petition No 0549/2021 by Adriana Muresan, bearing 22735signatures, on the alleged poor safety conditions in car parks for trucks and commercial vehicles on the European road network represents a record number of co-signatures for a petition in 2021;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 13 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas, however, the overall number of petitions remains modest in relation to the total population of the EU, revealing that efforts still need to be stepped up to increase citizens’ awareness about their right to petition; and increase the geographical representation of petitions submitted per Member State; whereas, in exercising the right to petition, citizens expect that the EU institutions will provide added value in finding a solution to their problems;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 25 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the right to petition offers Parliament the opportunity to enhance its responsiveness to complaints and concerns relating to the respect for EU fundamental rights and compliance with EU legislation in the Member States; whereas petitions are therefore a useful source of information on instances of misapplication or breaches of EU law and, thus, enable Parliament and other EU institutions to assess the transposition and application of EU law and its impact on the rights of EU citizens and residents; whereas the submitted petitions should indicate to the EU institutions the areas where major effort and action on the EU level is needed for the transposition and application of the EU law;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas Parliament has long been at the forefront of the development of the petitions process internationally and has the most open and transparent petitions process in Europe, allowing petitioners to participate fully in its activities; whereas participation of petitioners in the official missions organised by the Parliament remains restricted due to financing constraints;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 38 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas the main subjects of concern raised in petitions submitted in 2021 related to fundamental rights (in particular the impact of COVID-19 emergency measures on the rule of law and democracy, as well on the freedom of movement and the right to work), health (notably questions on the public health crisis resulting from the persistence of the pandemic, ranging from the protection of citizens’ health, including vaccination policy, to the use, implementation and application of the EU Digital COVID Certificate in the Member States and the alleged discrimination between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons), the environment (mostly concerning mining activities and their impact on the environment, illegal logging, violence against environmental whistle-blowers, conservation of bears and wolves as legally protected species, illicit waste disposal, nuclear safety, air pollution and the deterioration of natural ecosystems), minority rights and discrimination (including the rights of national or linguistic minorities), education (in particular questions related to discriminatory access to education or contested national reforms of the law on education), lack of safety in truck parking areas, the situation of EU students in the UK after the UK’s withdrawal from Erasmus+, and employment (in particular questions relating to national treatment of work contracts), in addition to many other areas of activity;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises the fundamental role of the Committee on Petitions in protecting and promoting the rights of EU citizens and residents by ensuring that petitioners’ concerns and complaints are examined in a timely and effective manner, that the petitioners are informed about the actions and progress done on their petitions, and that they are resolved, wherever possible, through an open, democratic and transparent petitions process;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 54 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of a continuous public debate on the Union’s field of activity in order to ensure that citizens are correctly informed about the scope of the Union’s competences and the different levels of decision-making; calls, in this regard, for broader awareness raising campaigns, through the active involvement of communications services, to help increase citizens’ knowledge about their right to petition, as well as the scope of the Union’s responsibilities, with a view to reducing the number of inadmissible petitions and better responding to citizens’ concerns; underlines that additional efforts need to be done to raise awareness on the right to petitions in those EU Member States from where proportionately less petitions are sent;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 83 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Takes note that, along with fundamental rights and environment, health was one of the main areas of concern for petitioners in 2021, while recognising that health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic were at the centre of the Committee on Petitions’ work; emphasises the attention paid by the Committee on Petitions to the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of internal market policy (in particular questions relating to national travel restrictions and their impact on the freedom of movement of persons within and outside the EU); points, in this regard, to the public hearing held by the Committee on Petitions jointly with the Committee on Transport and Tourism on 14 July 2021 entitled ‘How to improve air passenger rights during the COVID-19 crisis?’ Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 on 14 July 2021, in order to assess how effectively the Flight Compensation Regulation6 has been applied during the COVID-19 pandemic and if the EU legal framework on passenger rights was adequate to deal with such a crisis; _________________ 6 Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights. OJ L 46, 17.2.2004, p. 1.
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 89 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that environmental issues remained an area of serious concern for petitioners in 2021; regrets that environmental rules are not always correctly implemented in the Member States, as described in numerous petitions raising complaints about air pollution, conservation status of large carnivores, illegal logging, attacks on environmental activists, illicit plastic waste disposal, the deterioration of natural ecosystems, nuclear safety and the alteration of biodiversity; points to the important work carried out by the Committee on Petitions to highlight the impact of mining activities on the environment, as demonstrated by the number of petitions received on this topic; draws attention to the public hearing of 2 December 2021 on the environmental and social impacts of mining activity in the EU, held by the Committee on Petitions in association with the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, in order to acquire scientific knowledge on various aspects including mining legislation, safety standards, the social and environmental impacts of mines, environmental citizenship, public participation and transparency in the mining sector; stresses that the Commission should investigate as a matter of priority the cases of incorrect transposition and implementation of EU environmental legislation in order to efficiently address the concerns of the petitioners;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 92 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Stresses that illicit practices denounced in the petitions such as disposing the waste in illegal landfills, illegal logging and illegal timber trade, destruction of ecosystems, or illicit killing and trafficking of species protected under EU Habitats Directive constitute serious breaches of the EU law and amount to environmental crimes; highlights in this regard that the Commission should strengthen the tools to fight the environmental crime on the EU level to efficiently investigate and prosecute such crimes and bring the offenders to justice;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 103 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines the work of the Committee on Petitions in connection with petitions relating to alleged poor safety conditions in parking facilities for trucks and commercial vehicles on the European road network, in relation to attacks on carriers in truck parking areas; points, in this regard, to the motion for a resolution adopted by the Committee on Petitions on 6 October 2021 on the safety of truck parking lots in the EU (2021/2918(RSP))9 ; expects the Commission to follow-up on this resolution with concrete actions and strengthen the monitoring of safety conditions in truck parking areas; _________________ 9 Adopted by Parliament as a resolution on 25 November 2021. OJ C 224, 8.6.2022, p. 95.
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 109 #

2022/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Underlines that additional communication efforts should be guaranteed to increase the visibility of the activities of the Committee on Petitions in all the Member States of the EU, especially of its official missions;
2022/09/30
Committee: PETI
Amendment 64 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the rules and requirements regarding active mobility, new forms of mobility and micro-mobility are still underdeveloped or vary between Member States; ; whereas active mobility does not only represent transport of people or goods based on human physical activity but also includes transport of people or goods that is powered by a combination of an electric motor and human power, such as e-bikes;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 73 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the road safety objectives have only got limited improvements in the EU over the past years; whereas additional efforts on the level of the EU and on the national level are needed to achieve the EU’s goal enshrined in Vision Zero objectives;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 81 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas there is an urgent investment need to support safe infrastructure for cycling and micro- mobility to further promote clean mobility modes;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 140 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for better accessibility and connectivity between urban, peri-urban and rural areas, as well as multimodal passenger hubs, and further calls for unhindered access to smart, sustainable and affordable transport to be guaranteed for all;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 148 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission to propose a multimodal package in order to ensure an integrated approach of transport services, which includes an integrated door-to-door mobility modes for passengers and freight; stresses that such package should include safety control measures and training requirements for transport operators;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 180 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses its concern at the shortcomings in the regulation of micro- mobility in many Member States, as it does not facilitate this type of transportation and poses risks for people’s safety; invites the Commission, in this context, to collaborate with the Member States to draw up common road-safety guidelines and recommendations for micro-mobility such as speed limits, helmet requirements, safety standards for cycling infrastructure or training; encourages the Member States to proceed with the adaptation of their national legislation and to launch information campaigns and integrated mobility solutions including integrated ticketing;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 186 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls further on the Commission to harmonise technical standards and requirements regarding types of micro- mobility transport and its infrastructure; highlights in this regard that such standards should serve accessibility for the first and last mile, enabling citizens to reach or travel from destinations that are underserved by public transport;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 193 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2 a (new)
Highlights that urban infrastructure planning should be developed in accordance with EU standards on road safety, including standards for safety of cycling infrastructure and other active mobility modes (pedestrian and cycling tracks, lanes, bridges, tunnels, parking areas and fast recharging points for light means of transport batteries);
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 234 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that border cities should have the capacity to provide efficient and seamless cross-border daily transport while addressing missing links and bottlenecks, and ensuring better and more sustainable connectivity between European capitals and major cities; highlights, in this regard, that high-speed train services should be better deployed, particularly in the areas where such services are currently lacking;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 251 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the need for a continuous monitoring by the Commission of various factors determining the quality of urban transport services so as to evaluate the implementation of the current relevant legislation and address its shortcomings; underlines in this regard that national local authorities need to regularly share with the Commission statistical information on public transport provision, air quality, urban mobility accidents, passenger flows, commuting patterns, data about cycling, car sharing and other developing mobility modes;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 287 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights that AI and digitalisation improve efficiency, safety and affordability, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions; stresses that AI applied to urban transport should serve the goals of traffic congestion relief, major service predictability and customer satisfaction;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 304 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission to support regional and local authorities in providing secure bicycle parking at train stations, airports, maritime ports. Stresses that bicycle parking areas should have spaces dedicated to e-bikes including e- cargo bikes, and provide charging point and where possible repair points;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 328 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Highlights that UVARs should be accompanied by impact assessments, as well as consultation, information and notification of the involved economic factors; stresses that local authorities should notify the Commission before introducing UVARs;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 341 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Highlights the increasing potential of air mobility in urban areas, particularly for the potential use of drones by wide public; underlines that Unmanned Aerial Vehicles have to be considered as a part of mobility framework and therefore their safety and security should be regulated, including a.o. to avoid noise and reduce privacy concerns;
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 344 #

2022/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Urges the Commission and the Member States to increase research and investments in smart mobility, upskilling and reskilling, in order to contribute to the development of innovative transport solutions, low-emissions mobility solutions, modal shift and alternative fuels.
2022/10/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 38 #

2022/0398(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h – point i
(i) concealing funds, including moving, transfering, altering, using, accessing, dealing with, selling, hiring or mortgaging funds or economic resources owned, held, or controlled by a designated person, entity or body, which should be frozen in accordance with a Union restrictive measure, by the transfer of those funds, or economic resources to a thirdin any way that would result in any change in their volume, amount, location, ownership, possession, character, destination or any other change that would enable the funds to be used, including paortyfolio management;
2023/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 39 #

2022/0398(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 a (new)
Article3a Definition of public official For the purposes of this Directive, ‘public official’ means: (a) a Union official or a national official, including any national official of another Member State and any national official of a third country: (i) ‘Union official’ means a person who is: — an official or other servant engaged under contract by the Union within the meaning of the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (16) (the ‘Staff Regulations’), or — seconded to the Union by a Member State or by any public or private body, who carries out functions equivalent to those performed by Union officials or other servants; (ii) ‘national official’ shall be understood by reference to the definition of ‘official’ or ‘public official’ in the national law of the Member State or third country in which the person in question carries out his or her functions. The term ‘national official’ shall include any person holding an executive, administrative or judicial office at national, regional or local level. Any person holding a legislative office at national, regional or local level shall be assimilated to a national official; (b) any other person assigned and exercising a public service function involving the execution of Union restrictive measures in Member States or third countries.’
2023/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 42 #

2022/0398(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
(5) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that natural persons who have committed the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 may be subject to additional penalties. Those additional penalties shall include finesmaximum fines of at least EUR 10 000 000 when these offences involve funds or economic resources of a value of at least EUR 100 000.
2023/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 61 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The Zero Pollution Action Plan also sets out a vision for the year 2050, where air pollution is reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems. To this end, a staged approach towards setting current and future EU air quality standards should be pursued, establishing intermediate air quality standards for the year 2030 and beyond, and developing a perspective forensuring alignment with the WHO Air Quality Guidelines as soon as possible and at the latest by the year 2050 at the latest based on a regular review mechanism to take into account the latest scientific understanding. Given the links between pollution reduction and decarbonisation, the long- term objective to achieve the zero pollution ambition should be pursued hand in hand with reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as set by Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council42 . __________________ 42 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1–17).
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 72 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The Commission should regularly review the scientific evidence related to pollutants, their effects on human health and the environment and technological development. Based on the review, the Commission should assess whether applicable air quality standards are still appropriate to achieve the objectives of this Directive. The first review should be carried out by 31/12/2028 to assess whether air quality standards need to be updated based on the latest scientific information. The assessment should take into account the latest scientific knowledge on pollutants of emerging concerns and assess the opportunity to include air quality standards on those pollutants in the regulation.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 76 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In order to protect human health and the environment as a whole, it is particularly important to combat emissions of pollutants at source and to identify and implement the most effective emission reduction measures at local, national and Union level , in particular when it comes to emissions from agriculture, industries, transport and energy generation . Therefore, emissions of harmful air pollutants should be avoided, prevented or reduced and appropriate standards set for ambient air quality taking into account relevant World Health Organization standards, guidelines and programmes. Member States should collect data on measures and technologies to combat emissions of harmful air pollutants and make available information on best practices.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 78 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The Commission should assist Member States in carrying out regular transport infrastructure quality checks to identify the areas in need of decongestion and infrastructure optimisation, and take appropriate measures in these areas i.e. with the use of available EU funding opportunities;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 86 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) Air quality plans should include provisions for the reduction of voluntary idling of vehicles in order to reduce the emissions related to such idling.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 102 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Action plans should be drawn up indicating the measures to be taken in the short term where there is a risk of an exceedance of one or more alert thresholds in order to reduce that risk and to limit its duration. When the risk applies to one or more limit values or target values, Member States may, where appropriate, draw up such short-term action plansShort-term action plans should take into account best practice recommendations from the Commission as referred to in Article 20.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 104 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air as well as air quality plans and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public. In order for such information to be consistent and reliable, it is essential that Member States have sufficient air quality monitoring infrastructure deployed across the cities and towns. Where such infrastructure is lacking, it should be put in place at the earliest possibility, including with the use of the EU funding opportunities.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 105 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) It is necessary for the Member States and the Commission to collect, exchange and disseminate air quality information in order to understand better the impacts of air pollution and develop appropriate policies. Up-to-date information on concentrations of all regulated pollutants in ambient air as well as air quality plans and short-term action plans should also be readily available to the public. In order for such information to be consistent and reliable, it is essential that Member States have sufficient air quality monitoring infrastructure deployed across the cities and towns.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 116 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Furthermore, this Directive contributes to achieving: a) the Union’s pollution-reduction, biodiversity and ecosystem objectives in accordance with the 8th Environment Action Programme, as set out in Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 . b) enhanced synergies between the Union's air quality policy and other relevant Union policies, in particular climate and energy policies. __________________ 55 Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030 (OJ L 114, 12.4.2022, p. 22).
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 120 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
4. measures ensuring that the information on ambient air quality is made available to the publicand the sources of air pollutants is made available to the public, as well as relevant mitigation measures taken to reduce air pollution;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 128 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘level’ means the measured or modelled concentration of a pollutant in ambient air or the deposition thereof on surfaces in a given time;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 137 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) provision of hourly updated air quality index and other related and relevant health information;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 139 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ensuring the accuracy of air quality modelling applications;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 150 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. In zones in which ozone levels are below the ozone target value Member States shall take necessary measures to maintain those levels below the ozone target value and endeavomake sure to attain the long-term objectives specified in Section 2 of Annex I , in so far as factors including the transboundary nature of ozone pollution and meteorological conditions so permit, and provided that any necessary measures do not entail a disproportionate cost.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 168 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall consider including measures referred to in Article 20(2) and shall include specific measures aiming at the protection of sensitive population and vulnerable groups , including children in their air quality plans .
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 169 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall consider adopting measures to address and reduce voluntary engine idling, so as to reduce the impact of idling-related emissions which is particularly damaging in the areas of schools, hospitals and densely populated areas.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 170 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
When preparing air quality plans, Member States shall ensure that stakeholders whose activities contribute to the exceedance situation are encouraged to propose measures they are able to take to help end the exceedances and that non- governmental organisations, such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing the interests of sensitive population and vulnerable groups, other relevant health- care bodies and the relevant industrial federations are allowed to take part in those consultations. Member States shall make sure that relevant stakeholders and citizens are duly informed about the specific sources and air pollutants affecting air quality and the relevant air pollution mitigation measures that exist and are available on the market.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 173 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Within one year after the entry into force of this directive, the Commission shall publish examples of best practice actions to take within transport, residential and industrial sectors for the drawing-up of short-term action plans.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 177 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) air pollution sources and air pollutants affecting air quality
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 178 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) best practice mitigation measures and technologies available to reduce pollutant emissions
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 180 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall establish an air quality index covering sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone, and make itdata available in a coherent and easily understandable manner through a public source providing an hourly update. TIn order to ensure harmonized and comparable data across Europe, the air quality index shall consider thebe aligned with the latest recommendations by the WHO and build on the air quality indices at European scale provided by the European Environmental Agency.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 203 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part C – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) in general, the sampling point inlet shall be between 0,5 m (the breathing zone) and 4 m above the ground. Higher siting (up to 8m) may be appropriate if the sampling point is representative of a large area (a background location) or in other specific circumstances and any derogations shall be fully documented;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 240 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point e
(e) measures to encourage a shift towards less polluting forms of transport and to support changes in mobility behaviour;
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 247 #

2022/0347(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex VIII – Part B – point 2 – point i a (new)
(ia) measures by health authorities to encourage behavioural changes.
2023/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 2 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. Whereas the Union transport sector is essential for the Union’s economic, social and environmental development and its sustainability, and it ensures the territorial accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, with particular attention for peripheral, rural, insular and outermost regions and other disadvantaged areas;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 5 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Whereas transport is key to achieving climate neutrality by 2050; whereas more investment is needed to accelerate the shift to sustainable and smart mobility in line with the Green Deal, including the initiatives under the ‘Fit- for-55’ package and the REPowerEU Plan;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 15 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
D a. Whereas high inflation rates might hamper the financial soundness of infrastructure projects for project promoters and transport operators due to unexpected increases of costs;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and Member States to use the available financial tools in a comprehensiveHighlights that appropriate funding for transport projects will be instrumental in boosting EU recovery and advancing towards the green and digital transition; calls on the Commission and Member States to use the available financial tools - CEF, RRF, Cohesion Fund, InvestEU, ERDF - in an articulate and complementary way to maximise their effect on recovery while ensuring adequate long-term funding of Union transport projects;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 28 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the crucial role of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) in fostering the development and timely completion of a high performance trans- European network that is sustainable and interconnected; acknowledges the slight increase in the CEF-transport budget for 2023 compared to 2022 although notes that the increase is impaired by the current economic situation; underlines that the CEF should also support actions related to safe and secure infrastructure and, including truck parking areas, and sustainable mobility;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 31 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the role of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and related national plans in stimulating recovery in the transport and tourism sectors; welcomes the REPowerEU proposal according to which EUR 20 billion from of the revenues resulting from the auctioning of emissions trading system (ETS) allowances would complement the RRF funding under the REPowerEU module of the RRF as well as increased flexibility to Member States to transfer resources to the REPowerEU chapter of the RRF;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 38 #

2022/0212(BUD)

4. Welcomes the increase in the Cohesion Fund allocation to the CEF for transport in 2023; calls for further strengthening of the Fund to accommodate the modernisation needs of the transport sector, reduce its CO2 footprint and put in place new infrastructure elements, such as safe cycling lanes;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 41 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the increase in the InvestEU budget and its important reinforcement from NextGenerationEU by almost EUR 2,5 billion in 2023; invites the Commission to maintain a high level of investment after 2024 to maintain InvestEU’s role in fostering sustainable and safe infrastructure; recalls the Commission that adequate funding of InvestEU beyond the operation period of NGEU and through the MFF 2021-2027 is key to foster sustainable and safe infrastructure, mobility solutions and equipment and for the deployment of innovative technologies and alternative fuels;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 45 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the funding of the Just Transition Fund under the Just Transition Mechanism for 2023 and highlights the role of the Mechanism in disadvantaged regions; stresses the need to support the up-and reskilling of workers and jobseekers in the transport sector, as well as productive and sustainable investment in SMEs; stresses the need to facilitate the access to bank loans for SMEs in tourism;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 47 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes with great concern that the proposal on the EU Chips Act proceeds to a reallocation of funds from the CEF transport and digital envelopes to this new initiative by reducing EUR 400 million of the CEF budget, including EUR 150 million from CEF Digital and EUR 250 million from CEF Transport to be reallocated to the financing of the EU Chips Act; stresses that any new European policy needs to come with a new allocated budget and not a reshuffle within the current MFF;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 50 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes the modest increase in the military mobility budget for 2023 and the attempt to adapt parts of the TEN-T networks for a dual use of the transport infrastructure; regrets that the increase is not sufficient to compensate for the cut in the final envelope on the newly created military mobility budget line under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF II) programme 2021-2027 especially with regards to the current security situation in Europe determined by the Russian war in Ukraine; calls to increase military mobility budget for 2023 to strengthen the resilience of the bordering Member States;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 57 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates Parliament’s request for the creation of a specific programme on sustainable Union-wide tourism of a specific budget line that reflects both the importance of the sector in the Union economy and its needs in the aftermath of the past and current crises; stresses that the cost of travel disruptions should not fall on the shoulders of passengers and that such disruptions should be prevented by means of anticipation of the passenger flow;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 62 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Underlines that a dedicated tourism budget line should e.g. serve the goal of forecasting the travellers' influx and adapting the transport service provision in line with the trends;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 70 #

2022/0212(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Acknowledges the slight increase in the budgets of the transport Joint Undertakings;Joint undertakings the Clean Aviation, Europe’s Rail, Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research Joint Undertaking 3 (SESAR 3) and Clean Hydrogen highlights the importance of their work in boosting research and innovation and improving theransport sector’s performance and sustainability of the transport sector.and calls for adequate funding;
2022/07/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 8 #

2022/0170(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Greek authorities submitted the application on 21 December 2021, and that the Commission finalised its assessment on 30 May 2022 and notified it to Parliament on the same day; considers that the assessment period should be reduced so that the targeted beneficiaries get the necessary help with less delay;
2022/06/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2022/0170(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Calls on the Commission to reduce the time taken to assess EGF assistance requests and to mobilise the EGF in a more rapid way, so as to reduce the pressure on the national social security systems of the affected regions;
2022/06/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 88 #

2022/0167(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall take the necessary measures, including by introducing relevant provisions into their national legislation, to enable the confiscation based on the following elements: (a) Court decision establishing the link between the person or entity, including those placed on the EU sanction list, and the crime of aggression or facilitation of the aggression, committed by Russian political and military entities against Ukraine, in accordance with Article 2(1), point (na) of this Directive; (b) Court decision establishing the fact of violation of Union restrictive measures and targeted financial sanctions, in accordance with Article 3, points 11 and 12 of this Directive.
2023/03/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 89 #

2022/0167(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property, where confiscation is not possible pursuant to Articles 12 to 15 and the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the property is subject to the power of disposal of a politically exposed person and where a court has established a link between that person and the crime of aggression or facilitation of the aggression, committed by Russian political and military entities against Ukraine, or other crimes associated with the crime of Russia-provoked aggression, in accordance with Article 2(1), point (na) of this Directive; (b) the national court is satisfied that the frozen property is of illicit origin.
2023/03/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 37 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Versailles Declaration of 10-11 March 2022 of the Heads of States and Governments invited the Commission to propose by the end of May a REPowerEU plan to phase out the dependency on Russian fossil fuel imports, which was subsequently reiterated in the European Council Conclusions of 24-25 March 2022. This should be done well before 2030 in a way that is consistent with the EU’s Green Deal and the climate objectives for 2030 and 2050 enshrined in the European Climate Law. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 should therefore be amended to enhance its ability to support reforms and investments dedicated to diversifying energy supplies, in particular fossil fuels, nuclear and LNG, thereby strengthening the strategic autonomy of the Union alongside an open economy. Support should also be given to reforms and investments increasing the energy efficiency of the Member States’ economies and increasing the use of renewable energy, including hydrogen. Furthermore, in its Versailles Declaration of 10-11 March 2022, the European Council called for reducing EU strategic dependencies and invited, inter alia, the Commission to present options to address rising food prices and the issue of global food security as soon as possible.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 55 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The REPowerEU chapter should include new reforms and investments contributing to the REPowerEU aims and tackle, in a comprehensive manner, the crisis effects determined by the Russian military aggression against Ukraine. Furthermore, that chapter should contain an outline of other measures, financed from sources other than the Recovery and Resilience Facility, contributing to the energy-related objectives outlined in recital (3). The outline should cover measures whose implementation should take place between 1 February 2022 to 31 December 2026, the period during which the objectives set by this Regulation are to be achieved. As regards natural gas infrastructure, the investments and reforms of the REPowerEU chapters to diversify supply away from Russia should build on the needs currently identified through the assessment conducted and agreed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG), established in the spirit of solidarity as regards security of supply and take into account the reinforced preparedness measures taken to adapt to new geopolitical threats. Finally, the REPowerEU chapters should provide an explanation and a quantification of the effects of the combination of the reforms and investments financed by the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the other measures financed by other sources than the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 60 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) In order to provide adequate and rapid response, Member States are encouraged to use all available funds to provide immediate and temporary support to SMEs and households for micro investments in energy efficiency improvements and in renewable energy self-generation, via vouchers or tax credits.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 62 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 b (new)
(6 b) The REPowerEU chapter should equally represent an opportunity for the Member States to develop cross-border projects that accelerate the shift to renewables and that accelerate intra-EU pipeline expansions to fully utilise existing and future LNG regasification capacities to diversify natural gas supplies.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 64 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) In light of the current energy crisis, where high energy prices are aggravating the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, by further increasing the financial burden of consumers, in particular for households with low income or vulnerable companies, the REPowerEU chapters should include measures to help structurally address situations of energy poverty, through long-lasting investments and reforms. Such reforms and investments should provide a higher level of financial support in energy efficiency schemes, clean energy policies and schemes to reduce energy demand for those households and companies facing severe difficulties due to high energy bills. Energy demand-reduction measures taken by Member States should take into account the principles set by the Council Regulations on energy demand-reduction measures.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 76 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Member States are encouraged to complement and accompany the measures in the REPowerEU chapter with additional measures in line with the objectives of the chapter; in order to achieve them, Member States are encouraged to use additional Union funding, in particular the Innovation Fund, the Modernisation Fund, InvestEU and all remaining funds under the 2014- 2020 programming period; information on existing or planned Union financing should be included in the chapter.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 85 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13 a) At least 60% of the funds included under the REPowerEU chapter should be used for cross-border or multi-country projects. The Commission should conduct a supra-national assessment of the needs to secure energy supply in the Union as a whole, prior to the approval of the amended recovery and resilience plans that now include the REPowerEU chapters. On the basis of this supra- national energy security needs assessment, certain Member States may be granted an exception to this minimum requirement, taking also into account that the allocated amount should be commensurate with the specific challenges of the Member State and its geographical position. Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States should be sought and achieved throughout the process. Moreover, Member States are encouraged to co- operate among themselves as early as possible with a view to developing cross- border or multi-country projects to be included in the REPowerEU chapters.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 108 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17 a) The EU Emission Trading System (ETS) was established to create an efficient, predictable and market driven system for reducing emissions and tackling the climate crises. While the amendment to Directive 2003/87/EC is justified by an exceptional situation, it remains important not to undermine trust in the ETS market through short-term interventions, and this amendment should therefore be seen as a one-off measure, which will not be repeated.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 128 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. In line with the six pillars referred in Article 3 of this Regulation, the coherence and synergies they generate, and in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, the general objective of the Facility shall be to promote the Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion by improving the resilience, crisis preparedness, adjustment capacity and growth potential of the Member States, by mitigating the social and economic impact of that crisis, in particular on women, by contributing to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, by supporting the green transition, by contributing to the achievement of the Union’s 2030 climate targets set out in point (11) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999,and by complying with the objective of EU climate neutrality by 2050 and of the digital transition, by increasing the resilience of the Union energy system through a decrease of dependence on fossil fuels and an increase of the use of renewable energy, an increase of energy efficiency and diversification of energy supplies at Union level (‘REPowerEU objectives’) thereby contributing to the upward economic and social convergence, restoring and promoting sustainable growth and the integration of the economies of the Union, fostering high quality employment creation, and contributing to the strategic autonomy of the Union alongside an open economy and generating European added value.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 142 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – point h
(2 a) In Article 18 (4), paragraph 4 point(h) is replaced by the following: (h) an indication of whether the measures included in the recovery and resilience plan comprise cross-border or multi-country projects; with respect to the REPowerEU chapter, a confirmation that 60% of the total funds to be used have cross-border or multi-country dimension or effects, with an explanation of how the cross- border and/or multi-country projects included in the chapter contribute to the objectives outlined in Article 21c(1); the Commission may grant an exception from complying with this requirement on the basis of the supra-national energy security needs assessment referred to in Article 21ca;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 152 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) In Article 19(3), the following point iss are inserted:
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 155 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point da
(da) whether the reforms and investments referred to in Article 21c(1) effectively contribute towards the diversification of the Union’s energy supply or reduction of dependence on fossil fuels before 2030. or an increase of the use of renewable energy or an increase of energy efficiency;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 157 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point da a (new)
(da a) whether 60% of the total funds to be used under the chapter have cross- border or multi-country dimension or effects contributing to the objectives of Article 21c(1), taking into account the supra-national energy security needs assessment referred to in Article 21ca;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 168 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point d
(4 a) In Article 22, paragraph 2, point (d), is amended as follows: (d) for the purpose of audit and control and to provide for comparable information on the use of funds in relation to measures for the implementation of reforms and investment projects under the recovery and resilience plan, to collect, in and ensure access tolectronic format into a single database, the following standardised categories of data:
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 169 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 22 – paragraph 4
(4 b) In Article 22, paragraph 4 is replaced by: 4. The Commission shall make available to the Member States an integrated and interoperable information and monitoring system including a single data-mining and risk-scoring tool to access and analyse the relevant data, with a view to a generalised application by Member States of that system including with support of the Technical Support Instrumentas referred to in paragraph 3 (d).
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 171 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 31 – point 4 a (new)
(5 a) In Article 31, the following paragraph is inserted: 4 a. The Commission shall also provide in the annual report a set of recommendations for each Member State to accelerate the investments included in the respective recovery and resilience plans, after assessing the data available on final beneficiaries, and referring to best practices from other Member States.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 202 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21b – paragraph 1
(1) Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred or allocated to the Facility, including from the Innovation Fund, Modernisation Fund, Just Transition Fund, as well as all remaining resources under the 2014-2020 MFF programming period, subject to the conditions set out in Article 26a of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and Article 81a of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115. Those resources shall be used exclusively for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 210 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21b – paragraph 2
(2) Payments shall be made in accordance with Article 24 of this Regulation and subject to available funding. Payments of financial contributions stemming from the resources allocated according to Article 21a shall be made by 21 December 2027.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 212 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21ba (new)
Article 21 ba Calculation of maximum financial contribution The methodology for the calculation of the maximum financial contribution per Member State for the REPowerEU chapter under the Facility shall be described in Annex I and further explained in Annex II. The method takes into account, with regard to each Member State: — the population; — the inverse of the GDP per capita; — share of fossil fuels or the share of gas out of the gross available energy — the fall in real GDP in 2020 and the fall in real GDP in 2020 and 2021 combined.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 227 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) boosting energy efficiency in buildings, decarbonising industry, increasing production and uptake of LNG, nuclear, sustainable biomethane and renewable or fossil-free hydrogen and increasing the share of renewable energy,
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 230 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) providing immediate and temporary support to households and SMEs for micro investments in energy efficiency improvements and in renewable energy self-generation, via vouchers or tax credits.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 231 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) accelerating intra-EU pipeline expansions to fully utilise existing and future LNG regasification capacities to diversify natural gas supplies;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 232 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(b b) further development of cross- border projects that accelerate the shift to renewables, including through solar energy projects;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 240 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point da (new)
(d a) addressing energy poverty and incentivising reduction of energy demand.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 253 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) information on existing or planned Union financing on complementary or accompanying measures in line with the objectives of this chapter;
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 258 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 3
(3) The estimated costs of the reforms and investments of the REPowerEU chapter under paragraph 1 shall not be taken into account for the calculation of the plan’s total allocation under Article 18(4), point (f) and Article 19(3), point (f). A 60% of the funds to be used under the REPowerEU chapter shall have a cross- border or multi-country dimension or effect and shall contribute to the objectives outlined in Article 21c(1), except when the Member State concerned is granted an exception from this minimum requirement in the supra- national energy security needs assessment referred to in Article 21ca.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 271 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21ca (new)
Article 21ca Supra-national energy security needs assessment 1. The Commission shall conduct an assessment of the needs to secure energy supply in the Union as a whole, prior to the approval of recovery and resilience plan containing the REPowerEU chapter. This assessment shall aim to provide a supra-national perspective of the Union energy-security needs to facilitate the most efficient use of resources to reach the REPowerEU objectives. To that end, the Commission shall, at the latest by [3 month after the entry into force of this amending Regulation] draw up a report identifying and evaluating the most urgent infrastructure and investment needs to secure energy supply in the Union as a whole, including mainly cross- border or multi-country projects. 2.The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover at least the following: (a) The risk of energy-supply interruptions in each Member State in the short and medium-term; (b)The most relevant infrastructure and investment needs to secure energy supply in the Union as a whole, including a cross-border and multi-country dimension; 3. Member States should contribute to the elaboration of this report by providing information on national energy security needs and projects as requested by the Commission.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 275 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21d – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2 a) The Commission shall also provide in the REPowerEU chapter of the annual report mentioned in paragraph (2) a set of recommendations for each Member State to accelerate the investments committed in their national recovery and resilience plans, after assessing the data available on final beneficiaries, and referring to best practices from other Member States.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 279 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21d – paragraph 2b (new)
(2 b) The Commission shall make use of the data collected in accordance with Article 22 paragraph 2, in particular in order to provide comparable information on the use of funds in relation to measures for the implementation of reforms and investment projects under the REPowerEU chapter.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 285 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10e – paragraph 1
(1) For the period until 31 December 2026, the allowances released pursuant to Article 1(6) of Decision (EU) 2015/1814an amount of allowances from the total quantity of allowances shall be auctioned until the amount of revenue obtained from such auctioning has reached EUR 20 billion. This revenue shall be made available to the Recovery and Resilience Facility established by Regulation (EU) 2021/241 and shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of that Regulation. These allowances shall be taken in equal shares from the quantity to be auctioned in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 10 and the quantity that would otherwise be allocated free of charge.
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 290 #

2022/0164(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Decision (EU) 2015/1814
Article 1
Article 1 of Decision (EU) 2015/1814 is amended as follows: In paragraph 5, first subparagraph, the third sentence is replaced by the following: ‘ By way of derogation from the first and second sentences, until 31 December 2030, the percentages and the 100 million allowances referred to in those sentences shall be doubled. ’ In paragraph 6, the following subparagraph is added: ‘ By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, for a period until 31 December 2026, a number of allowances shall be released from the reserve and auctioned in accordance with Article 10e of Directive 2003/87/EC, until the amount of revenue obtained from such auctioning has reached EUR 20 billion. ’deleted
2022/09/29
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 149 #

2022/0162(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Where budgetary commitments are decommitted in any financial year after the year in which they were made as a result of the total or partial non-implementation of the actions for which they were earmarked, the appropriations corresponding to such decommitments shall be cancelled, unless otherwise provided in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 , Regulation (EU) No 223/2014, Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 and notwithstanding Article 15 of this Regulationmade available again to the benefit of any budget line in the same heading or be transferred to the Flexibility Instrument.
2023/02/20
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 151 #

2022/0162(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15
Making appropriations corresponding to decommitments available again 1. The appropriations corresponding to decommitments referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Regulation (EU) No 223/2014, Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 , Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 may be made available again in the event of a manifest error attributable solely to the Commission. To that end, the Commission shall examine decommitments made during the preceding financial year and shall decide, by 15 February of the current financial year, on the basis of requirements, whether it is necessary to make the corresponding appropriations available again. 2. In addition to the case referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the appropriations corresponding to decommitments shall be made available again in the event of the decommitment of resources transferred back to the Fund from which they have been initially transferred in line with the provisions of Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 . 3. Commitment appropriations corresponding to the amount of decommitments made as a result of total or partial non-implementation of corresponding research projects may also be made available again to the benefit of the research programme the projects belong to or its successor in the context of the budgetary procedure. 4. Commitment appropriations corresponding to the amount of decommitments made as a result of total or partial non implementation of an action under Regulation (EU) 2021/947, Regulation (EU) 2021/1529, Decision (EU) 2021/1764 and Council Regulation (Euratom) 2021/948 shall be made available again to the benefit of the budget line of origin.Article 15 deleted
2023/02/20
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 31 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Violence against women and domestic violence can be exacerbated where it intersects with discrimination based on sexgender and other grounds of discrimination prohibited by Union law, namely nationality, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation. Member States should therefore pay due regard to victims affected by such intersectional discrimination, through providing specific measures where intersecting forms of discrimination are present. In particular, lesbian, bisexual, trans, non-binary, intersex and queer (LBTIQ) women, women with disabilities and women with a minority racial or ethnic background are at a heightened risk of experiencing gender- based violence.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 39 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 60
(60) In order to ensure victims of violence against women and domesticgender-based violence, domestic violence and cyber violence are identified and receive appropriate support, Member States should ensure that professionals likely to come into contact with victims receive, including law enforcement authorities, receive mandatory training and targeted information. Trainings should cover the dynamics and impact of sexual assault victimization, the risk and prevention of intimidation, repeat and secondary victimisation and the availability of protection and support measures for victims and how to assess the risk of their situation. Trainings should also cover how to properly interview and assist a victim who wishes to lodge a complaint. To prevent and appropriately address instances of sexual harassment at work, persons with supervisory functions should also receive training. These trainings should also cover assessments regarding sexual harassment at work and associated psychosocial safety and health risks as referred to under Directive 89/391/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council45 . Training activities should also cover the risk of third party violence. Third party violence refers to violence which staff may suffer at the workplace, not at the hands of a co-worker, and includes cases, such as nurses sexually harassed by a patient. _________________ 45 Council Directive 89/391/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1).
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 40 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 61
(61) In order to counteract underreporting, Member States should also liaise with law enforcement authorities in the development of trainings in particular regarding harmful gender stereotypes, but also in the prevention of offences, given their typical close contact with groups at risk of violence and victims. Mandatory trainings of law enforcement authorities on how to receive a victim of gender- based violence, domestic violence or cyberviolence is essential to properly assist the filing of a complaint by the victim and to properly assess the risk of her situation.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 46 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Directive lays down rules to prevent and combat violence against women and domestic gender-based violence, domestic violence and cyberviolence. It establishes minimum rules concerning:
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 47 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the rights of victims of all forms of violence against women or domestic gender-based violence, domestic violence or cyberviolence before, during or after criminal proceedings;
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 57 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Member States shall ensure a minimum of one rape crisis or sexual violence referral centre per 200 000 women. The geographical distribution of these centres shall also be taken into account so as not to leave any isolated area.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The appropriate training for law enforcement authorities handling victim's judicial complaint is especially crucial in the context of the fight against gender- based violence, domestic violence and cyberviolence, considering they may be the first authorities to whom the victim is reaching out in the judicial proceedings.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 73 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) exchanging information and best practices with relevant Union agencies; in particular with the European Institute for Gender Equality and Europol cybercrime center to provide help Member States;
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 76 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Article 44a new - Financing and monitoring of the measures and objectives laid down in this Directive
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 77 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. The relevant agencies, in particular the European Institute for Gender Equality and Europol, shall be provided with the necessary human and financial resources to fulfil the objectives, tasks and responsibilities assigned to it under this directive financed by a contribution from the general budget of the Union, with the necessary appropriations drawn exclusively from unallocated margins under the relevant heading of the multiannual financial framework and/or through the mobilisation of the relevant special instruments, meaning that their support should not come at the expense of existing budget lines and Union programmes.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 78 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Member States shall ensure that sufficient public funding is provided for the measures adopted in order for them to be effectively implemented.
2023/01/26
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
— having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter referred to as Moldova), of the other part (AA), which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) and fully entered into force on 1 July 2016,
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
— having regard to the outcome of the 12th EU-Moldova Human rights dialogue held on the 13th of September 2021 by videoconference,
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas after a period of political instability and democratic backsliding Maia Sandu won the presidential election with 57,75% of the votes on 15 November 2020 and Party of Action and Solidarity received 52,8%of the votes and won 63 of the 101 seats in the Parliament of Moldova in the early parliamentary elections on 11 July 2021;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas during the last Presidential and parliamentary elections the people of the Republic of Moldova have demonstrated their strong commitment to democracy, the rule of law and the European future of their country by giving the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) a strong mandate for an ambitious program of reforms;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas participants in the 10th meeting of the EU-Moldova PAC held on 2 December 2021, took note of the resolve of the Republic of Moldova President, government and parliamentary majority to implement the EU-Moldova Association Agenda thoroughly, thus bringing tangible improvements to the Moldovan citizens' lives;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the concrete outcomes of the sixth EU-Moldova Association Council that took place on 28 October 2021 give new impetus for closer and enhanced cooperation on key areas;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas according to recent opinion polls, 71,6% of the citizens of the Republic of Moldovan support the objective of the European integration of their country;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B c (new)
Bc. whereas Moldova ranks 105th out of 180 countries in the 2021 Corruption Perception Index (up from 115th in 2020) and persistent challenges remain in this area, as for years corruption has seriously affected the state apparatus, stunted economic growth and modernization and undermined democracy;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B d (new)
Bd. whereas Moldova ranks 89th out of 180 countries in the 2021 World Press Freedom Index (up by two places compared to the previous year) and concerns remain linked notably to concentration of media ownership, monopolisation of the advertising market, lack of editorial independence and control of media institutions by economic and political groups;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes the European Union should affirm more clearly its support to the European aspirations of the Republic of Moldova and make the benefits of European integration more tangible for its citizens; underlines that a clear position on the European integration of the country will be a powerful incentive to continue with the much needed reforms;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that the high expectations by people of Moldova need to be fulfilled by achieving tangible improvement in their livelihoods and restoring their trust in state institutions;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to increase its engagement with its Moldovan counterparts and to maximise its political, technical and financial support to the Republic of Moldova during this crucial time in order to give further impetus to progress and to ensure adequate absorption capacity for EU assistance; points out, in this respect, that the European Union should be more strategic in its support and calls for the establishment, at the level of the Commission, of a Support Group for the Republic of Moldova on the model of the one already established for Ukraine; underlines that such a group could play a pivotal role in advancing reforms in the key areas of justice and the fight against corruption, to stimulate long-term socio-economic development and recovery, for the benefit of the people of Moldova;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission toWelcomes the intensified high- level political dialogue with the Moldovan authorities and calls on the Commission and the European External Action Service to further increase its engagement with its Moldovan counterparts and to maximise its political, technical and financial support to the Republic of Moldova during this crucial time in order to give further impetus to progress and to ensure adequate absorption capacity for EU assistance;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need to look into ways to consolidate and enhance the capacity of Moldovan public institutions in this regard;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses the importance of an updated Association Agenda for the guidance of the implementation of the AA/DCFTA; reiterates its call on the Commission to adopt regular annual comprehensive reports assessing implementation of reforms based on clear benchmarks and a common methodology;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the results of the sixth Eastern Partnership summit held on 15 December 2021, which reaffirmed the significant achievements of cooperation in this format and charted an ambitious course for future cooperation based on shared values and focusing on recovery, resilience and reform; acknowledges the initiative by the Republic of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine to enhance their cooperation as the three associated partners of the EU (‘Association Trio’); welcomes that the summit acknowledged the European aspirations and the European choice of the Association Trio countries;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the three countries to work together to further advance the reform agenda and exchange best practices; calls on the Commission to respond to the interest of the associated countries to deepen sectoral cooperation with the EU in areas of mutual interest while maintaining the principle of inclusivity;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes and urges the steps undertaken by the authorities to continue their efforts to address the issue of unfounded asylum applications and alignment of the Republic of Moldova's visa policy with the EU lists of visa- required third countries as well as in the areas of financial fraud, anti-money laundering, prevention and fight against corruption, and organised crime;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 77 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses the importance of a clear and effective policy in the area of recovering embezzled funds and fraudulent assets by establishing international cooperation with a focus on better liaison with EUROPOL and EUROJUST; encourages the Moldovan authorities to build a framework dedicated to strategic collaboration with the European Public Prosecutor's Office for better management of fraud and anti- corruption investigations;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Encourages ongoing and close cooperation between the General Prosecutor's Office in Chisinau and the EUROJUST office, including a regular secondment of Moldovan representatives to the EUROJUST office as a preparatory step for building a task force dedicated to recovering embezzled funds and fraudulent assets;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to provide the Republic of Moldova with EUR 60 million through a new budget support programme in order to deal with a gas supply crisis artificially created by Gazprom and to mitigate the impact of the rising prices on the most vulnerable Moldovans; notes that the crisis further underscores the importance of the diversification of energy supplies and routes, strengthening energy efficiency and of building long-term resilience through a transition to more sustainable energy sources and investing in key infrastructure; notes that this could also help build resilience against any potential efforts by third parties to use energy as a geopolitical lever;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines the geostrategic importance of severing the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine energy dependency on Russia and notes the urgency of implementing and further developing energy interconnection projects with the EU; asks the Commission to urgently set up a dedicated structure within its administration that will work to support the Republic of Moldova’s and Ukraine’s integration with the European continental power grid (ENTSO-E); notes that the support and promotion of the EU enhanced cooperation with the EaP associated countries in these sectors will also create economic growth and will strengthen the energy resilience of the region;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Welcomes the approval of the National Strategy for Regional Development for the years 2022-2028 and calls for an administrative-territorial reform focused on growing competitiveness and sustainable development; underlines the necessity of a balanced social and economic growth in all regions of Moldova and efficient implementation of national policies of regional development;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 95 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the inadmissibility of the weaponisation of the gas supply in order to put political pressure on the Republic of Moldova to change its geopolitical orientation; urges the Commission and the European External Action Service to continue providing the Republic of Moldova with the financial and technical support necessary to ensure its resilience against such external interference; calls on the Moldovan authorities to maintain the country’s commitment as a member of the Energy Community to implementing the EU’s Third Energy Package, in particular the unbundling of gas and electricity transmission and distribution;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes that, as a complement to the assistance already provided by the EU in the context of the energy crisis, the EU Delegation in Chișinău mobilized EUR 5 million to provide support to vulnerable categories of population most affected by the rise in energy prices;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that while the presidential and the early parliamentary elections were well managed and competitive, persistent shortcomings need to be addressed by implementing the recommendations of the Council of Europe Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR; underlines the fact that the election campaign was dividing and conducted in a negative way which involved intolerant rhetoric and attacks on the person; calls for better monitoring of campaign spending, transparency of political party funding and a system to better identify voting day irregularities;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the agreement between the EU and the Republic of Moldova on launching a High-Level Political and Security Dialogue; invites the Republic of Moldova to further align its positions with those of CFSP and to continue its contribution to Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and its miss and the renewed engagement on security and CSDP through the bilateral political staff-to- staff consultations; encourages the EEAS and the Republic of Moldova to make full use of these platforms in order to advance cooperation on matters such as, but not limited to combating hybrid threats, enhancing resilience, strengthening cybersecurity, enhancing strategic communications;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 114 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Invites the Republic of Moldova to further align its positions with those of CFSP and to continue its contribution to Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and its missions as well as encourages EU and the Republic of Moldova to identify ways to expand this cooperation;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 116 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the EU institutions to include the Republic of Moldova in new formats of cooperation concerning cybersecurity, hybrid threats and cyber- crime investigations;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Calls for an increase of the budget and a strengthening of the European Union's Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM), which plays a very important role in harmonising border management and customs regime to that of the Union, also with regard to the solution of the Transnistrian issue;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates its support for a comprehensive and peaceful settlement of the Transnistria conflict based on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, within its internationally recognised borders, with a special status for the Transnistrian region, inside a viable Moldovan state;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines that any resolution to the Transnistrian issue must respect the Republic of Moldova’s sovereign right to choose its own defence and foreign policy orientation;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Expresses its concern over the numerous military exercises conducted by the Russian military forces in Transnistria and calls on the Russian Federation to withdraw its military forces and armaments from the Transnistria region fully and in an orderly manner, in accordance with the repeated requests of the Moldovan authorities and in respect of the Republic of Moldova's sovereignty and territorial integrity;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Calls on the Republic of Moldova, the Russian Federation, EU Member States and other international partners to cooperate on the total removal and destruction of the about 20 000 tons of old Soviet-era ammunition stored at the Cobasna ammunition depot, which, due to it being long time expired, represents a grave danger for the people on both banks of the Dniester river;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 d (new)
10d. Encourages the Moldovan Government to continue promoting an environment favourable to the settlement of conflicts and supporting activities that increase confidence and people-to-people contacts across conflict-divided communities;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 135 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 e (new)
10e. Praises the Moldovan authorities for the support offered to the Transnistria region in the context of the COVID- 19pandemic, including through the donation of 10% of its vaccines supply, the training of medical staff and the processing of COVID-19 tests;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 f (new)
10f. Expresses its concern regarding the deteriorating human rights situation in the Transnistrian region; reminds the Russian Federation of the responsibility it has regarding the respect of human rights in the Transnistria region, as confirmed by several rulings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR); calls on the Russian authorities to execute all the ECHR judgements regarding violations of human rights and the right to freedom and security in the Transnistria region;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Council to extend the areas of cooperation with the Republic of Moldova under the European Peace Facility; encourages Moldovan authorities to make further use of the potential European Peace Facility assistance in subsequent annual programmes in order to consolidate its capacity in countering cyber and hybrid threats; encourages the EEAS and the Council to further support strengthening capacity of the defence sector through assistance measures under this instrument;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls for an increased and better communicated EU support for development projects in the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 152 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Reiterates the fundamental importance of justice reform and the fight against corruption; recognises the magnitude of the challenge faced by the authorities and encourages them to focus on established priorities; calls for the adoption and implementation of the amendments to the Constitution on justice that were voted by the Parliament on 23 September 2021, as well as of the Strategy for Ensuring the Independence and Integrity of the Justice Sector 2021- 2-20245;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 155 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that the EU must offer more support, including increased financial allocations, for the complex reform of the justice system in the Republic of Moldova; strongly supports the objective of cleaning the justice system of persons that have integrity problems and bringing about comprehensive changes that would build strong foundations for Rule of Law in the country; underlines the importance of ensuring a merit-based and transparent selection process for judicial appointments; takes note of the steps taken by the authorities in order to pursue extraordinary vetting of judges and prosecutors in office and to improve the system of selection and appointment of judges and prosecutors; recalls the importance of consulting and implementing the recommendations of the Venice Commission in the framework of the judicial reform process;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls the Moldovan authorities to continue cooperation with the Council of Europe and the European Union on justice reform, including on initiatives related to the extraordinary evaluation of judges and prosecutors (vetting) and evaluation of the integrity of candidates for the position of members of Superior Council of Magistracy and Superior Council of Prosecutors (pre-vetting);
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Deplores the fact that the investigation into the bank fraud exposed in 2014 has still not yielded significant results in terms of bringing those responsible to justice and recovering lost assets; stresses that this lack of progress has a serious negative effect on the credibility of the justice system in the eyes not only of the people of the Republic of Moldova, but also of the country’s international partners; calls for an intensification of the process of completing criminal cases against persons involved in the "Russian laundromat" and bank fraud;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Deplores the fact that the investigation into the bank fraud exposed in 2014 has still not yielded significant results in terms of bringing those responsible to justice and recovering lost assets; stresses that this lack of progress has a serious negative effect on the credibility of the justice system in the eyes not only of the people of the Republic of Moldova, but also of the country’s international partners; invites the Member States to offer the Republic of Moldova's authorities substantial support in the investigation of the case if requested;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Welcomes the new regulations in the field of public procurement, but emphasizes the need for public monitoring of procurement processes and the importance of clearer and permanent reports to the general public; encourages the simplification of the mechanisms by which civil society representatives can be part of procurement processes and emphasizes the need to replace bureaucratic processes with transparent ones that remove barriers and restore confidence in the allocation and use of public budgets;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 169 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the importance of tackling financial fraud, money laundering and organised crime through comprehensive legislation and effective implementation; calls for increased international cooperation on these issues, including with the relevant EU agencies and platforms;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Welcomes the plans to enact in the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova legal changes aimed at improving the legal framework to make it possible to implement the mechanism of extended confiscation of assets accumulated through corruption;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2021/2237(INI)

13c. Reiterates its support for the involvement of civil society in decision- making processes in order to increase public scrutiny over reforms and promote their social acceptability;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Underlines the importance of further strengthening the legal framework for equality and non-discrimination, in particular by closing the existing legislative gaps in order to effectively counteract hate crimes and hate speech, as well as addressing discrimination in employment;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 190 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Welcomes the progress made by the Republic of Moldova in the process of deinstitutionalization of the child care system and the steps taken to develop a new Child Protection Programme and Action Plan for 2022-2026;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 209 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Highlights the positive effect of the EU-Moldova Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) agreement on the trade between the two sides, with more than a 33% increase in total trade between 2015 and 2020, over 61% of Moldovan exports going to the EU market and over 70% of Moldovan companies engaged in export activities exporting to the EU market;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Encourages the Moldovan government to intensify European cooperation to improve the digital infrastructure and improve the resilience of the national system in the face of cyber-attacks; supports the process of digitization of economic processes and the development of special mechanisms for IT companies, especially innovation and start-ups that have problems finding sources of financing and as such fail to support their transition and growth process;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 212 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Encourages and supports the harmonisation of the legislation of the Republic of Moldova with the EU acquis in the field of trade for the best possible implementation of the DCFTA; calls on the Commission to begin the process of integrating the Eastern Partnership countries into the European Single Market by setting the first step through analysing their alignment from a legal, economic and technical perspective and developing regulations and standards for preparing partner countries for the economic integration into a common market;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 215 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Acknowledges the commitment of the Republic of Moldova to pursue legal approximation with EU agricultural legislation in order to increase exports to the EU and open up new commercial opportunities for its farmers and rurlocal communities;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 221 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the EU institutions to give concrete support to the Republic of Moldova to meet the criteria to join the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) once it has met all of the necessary requirements;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 222 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Emphasises that the Republic of Moldova's exports could increase through expanded production, reprioritising exports, and adjusting quality standards; reiterates that the main categories of goods for export remain animal and vegetable products, which are the least profitable products that Moldova can offer to Member States; calls on the European Commission to support the Republic of Moldova in diversifying its exports to the EU, including through a better fulfilment of its tariff quotas for high-profit products;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 228 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Encourages the harmonisation of national quality standards with those of the EU; underlines the disadvantage for Moldovan entrepreneurs and businesses due to the large number of different standards they need to meet for exports into the Member States and emphasises the need for a policy of excluding standards that are non-aligned or in direct conflict with European standards;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 233 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Stresses the need for greater transparency regarding the results of the audit missions of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE) and emphasises the need to grow and strengthen the network of laboratories for sanitary and phytosanitary analysis while intensifying the training of inspectors and specialists working in these laboratories for better implementation of regulations in the field of phytosanitary and food safety;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 e (new)
16e. Supports a better policy of integration of environmental policies in the economic sectors and broader participation of the citizens in the process of elaborating the environmental protection policies; calls for a more intense approach to partnerships with civil society for a better functioning waste collection and recycling activity, as well as increased attention to land afforestation, reduction of soil degradation and water quality;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 245 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes the launch of a high- level energy dialogue between the European Union and Moldova in the context of the emergency situation in Moldova’s gas sector. Invites the Commission to consider the launch of other enhanced / high-level sectorial dialogues, such as in the justice sector or climate / Green Deal, which would contribute to reaching objectives within the AA and DCFTA;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the importance of fighting disinformation, fake news and propaganda, in particular through strategic communication that would improve public perception on the tangible benefits that EU cooperation and support brings to Moldovan citizens; hopes that the reconstituted Television and Radio Broadcasting Council will effectively carry out its tasks as a media watchdog and address the long-standing shortcomings of the media landscape;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Reiterates that strengthening media pluralism and its independence should be a priority for both the Union and the Republic of Moldova; calls on the Commission to increase support to the independent media, including in the regions; points out the need for a thorough reform of the media environment in the Republic of Moldova in order to enhance transparency and competition in the sector; recalls the importance of ensuring full implementation of the Audiovisual code and independence of the Audiovisual Council to ensure access to impartial information;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 255 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Emphasises the need for an institutional framework and a consistent set of public policies through which misinformation and disinformation in the media can be opposed and fought, mainly in the online environment. Calls on the Moldovan authorities to build a national media development program to review the legal framework, regulate the economic situation, specifically the advertising law, ensure fair competition in the media market, and strengthen media actors' resilience to commercial attacks and political influence;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 261 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Invites the European Commission to consider the idea of creating a Support Group for Moldova, in order to better streamline EU financial and technical support and provide necessary assistance to Moldovan authorities, particularly in the implementation of the Economic and Investment Plan for EaP countries and the Economic Recovery Plan for Moldova;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Welcomes the efforts and the continuing progress made by Moldovan authorities towards further improving its safety oversight system and implementing international aviation safety standards that led to the removal of all air carriers certified in the Republic of Moldova from the EU Air Safety List, and calls the Moldovan authorities to ensure the implementation of the EU-Republic of Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 265 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18d. Calls for the Republic of Moldova and the EU to advance work on the Moldovan sections of the trans-European extended transport network for EaP (TEN-T), to support the railway sector reforms and to explore together with Member States and International Financial Institutions possibilities for upgrading the EU-Republic of Moldova rail connections, while ensuring environmental sustainability; encourages the Republic of Moldova to advance in implementing the relevant acquis; and calls for increased cooperation and the gradually integration of the Republic of Moldova into the EU Transport Market and Transport Community;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 266 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 e (new)
18e. Calls on the EU institutions to analyse the possibility of including the Republic of Moldova and the other EaP associated countries as observers in the proceedings of the Committees established pursuant to Article 291 TFEU and Regulation (EU) No. 182/2011(7), as well as in the meetings of the Council working groups and committees, to show the EU’s commitments to further integration and to strengthening the countries’ reform orientation and administrative know-how;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 267 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 f (new)
18f. Welcomes the commitments of the Republic of Moldova in the field of environment and climate change, and the intention to cooperate with the EU in implementing the EU Green Deal; encourages to seek guidance and support from the European Commission to strengthen cooperation in this direction;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 268 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 g (new)
18g. Supports a continued cooperation between the Republic of Moldova and the EU on addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, as well as enhancing long term cooperation in the field of public health;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 269 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 h (new)
18h. Welcomes the adoption by the European Commission of the decision of equivalence of COVID-19certificates issued by the Republic of Moldova to the EU Digital COVID Certificate and encourages the EU Member States to continue to ensure its application;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 271 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the signature on 29 November 2021 of the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Parliament and the Parliament of Moldova on a joint framework for parliamentary democracy support, which opens up opportunities for strengthening its institutional capacity and parliamentary democracy in the Republic of Moldova through closer bilateral institutional ties; invites the Parliament of Moldova to implement the full range of democracy support activities available to it, including a Jean Monnet Dialogue and a Simone Veil programme, on the basis of a mutually agreed roadmap; points out the important role played by the EU-Republic of Moldova Parliamentary Association Committee in terms of fostering exchanges of experiences and good practices with the Moldovan parlamentarians; believes that these exchanges can be further enhanced in order to work together, at parliamentary level, for supporting reforms and monitoring their implementation;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 272 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the signature on 29 November 2021 of the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Parliament and the Parliament of Moldova on a joint framework for parliamentary democracy support, which opens up opportunities for strengthening its institutional capacity and parliamentary democracy in the Republic of Moldova through closer bilateral institutional ties; invites the Parliament of Moldova to implement the full range of democracy support activities available to it, including a Jean Monnet Dialogue and a Simone Veil programme, on the basis of a mutually agreed roadmap;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2021/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Invites the Parliament of Moldova to implement the full range of democracy support activities available to it, including a Jean Monnet Dialogue and a Simone Veil programme, on the basis of a mutually agreed roadmap;
2022/02/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises the important role of the Committee on Petitions in identifying and flagging possible breaches of the rule of law, taking into account the numerous petitions received from citizens concerned about breaches of the rule of law in several Member States; strongly believes that full protection of all EU citizens can only be ensured throughout the Union if all Member States comply with all principles of the rule of law; stresses that the Rule of Law Report must be objective and assess all Member States according to the same criteria;
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the rule of law includes principles such as legality, legal certainty, the separation of powers, the prohibition of the arbitrary exercise of executive power, effective judicial protection by independent and impartial courts in full respect of fundamental rights, the fight against impunity, the enforcement of judgments including the permanent subjection of all public authorities to established laws and procedures, and equality before the law;
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 18 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that judicial accountability and, prosecutorial and judicial independence and the enforcement of judgments are crucial components of the rule of law; calls on the Commission to enforce these core EU values when they are infringed by Member States in order to increase citizens’ trust in the judiciaryor when Member States fail to act on violations carried out by sub-state entities, in order to increase citizens’ trust in the judiciary, and by using all means at their disposal, especially the rule of law conditionality mechanism, where applicable;
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 29 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that emergency regimes and decree-laws were urgently instated by governments in several Member States because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that this has affected the functioning of the national justice systems and the activity of the courts; draws attention toregrets the lack of participation and the non-involvement of national parliaments in the decision- making and the closure of parliaments in numerous Member States during the pandemic, which has increased the power of governments and has led to a lack of accountability and transparency;
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 44 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Is deeply concerned about the status of Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal, the close connection between prosecutors and the government (in particular the Public Prosecutor General/Minister of Justice) and the complete disregard for not only EU law requirements, but also European Convention on Human Rights and Polish Constitutional requirements2 ; is further concerned about the impartiality of the judiciary in Hungary3 and the iandependence of the judiciary in signs of weakening of the rule of law in Slovakia, Malta, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Spain4 ; _________________ 2 Petitions No 0559/2020, 1154/2020, 1246/2020, 1360/2020 and 0869/2021. 3 Petition No 1512/2020. 4 Petitions No 1180/2020, 1182/2020, 1326/2020, 1367/2020, 1561/2020 and 0353/2021.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 50 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the indispensability of enforcing court sentences, both at national and EU level; condemns all national and regional governments on EU territory that refuse to follow judgments; emphasises that sentences of the Court of Justice of the European Union have to be implemented in a timely manner and as soon as possible in accordance with the Treaties, which the Member States agreed to comply with5 , in particular, those court sentences that seek to prevent discrimination on grounds of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic characteristics, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation; _________________ 5 Petition No 0858/2017.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 69 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets the fact that that the safety of journalists is not universally guaranteed; underlines the importance of media pluralism and the need to protect journalists against threats and attacks in order to prevent self-censorship and to assure freedom of expression and the right to information and safeguard the journalistic profession; calls on the Commission to improve the instruments for assessing measures taken by governments that may undermine freedom of information and pluralism;
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 74 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Draws attention to the need for better regulation and more transparency regarding social networking sitemedia platforms9 ; takes note of the insufficiency of the horizontal assessment of the media sector and the lack of representation of online media in the Commission’s 2021 Rule of Law report (COM(2121)700); _________________ 9 Petitions No 1336/2020, 0036/2021, 0137/2021, 0691/2021 and 0719/2021.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 76 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Observes that fake news and the resulting misinformation aimed at EU citizens are a threat to our EU democracies10 ; notes, however, that overly extensive control of false information and the increased promotion of disinformation campaigns may lead, which must be combated with guarantees and without giving rise to any violation of Article 11(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights which guarantees the right to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authorities and regardless of borders11 ; _________________ 10 Petitions No 1310/2019, 0268/2020, 0743/2020 and 1293/2020. 11 Petition No 1336/2020.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 88 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned about the increase in hate crimes against minorities, in particular those related to religious beliefs, political ideas and sexual orientation12 ; is aware of the difficult balance between hate speech and freedom of expression and acknowledges that the boundaries are hard to define; calls on the Commission to continue its work to establish effective criteria against this problem, and to do so without affecting the pluralism of the system; _________________ 12 Petitions No 0354/2020, 0657/2020, 1038/2020, 0471/2021, 0480/2021, 0667/2021, 0704/2021, 0725/2021, 0820/2021, 0855/2021 and 0894/2021.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 101 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that the role of civil society organisations is of particular importance; calls on the Commission to foster debatesopen, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and with civil society organisations in order to take note of all their concerns and involve them more effectively in follow-up meetings; highlights the need to offer longer consultation periods to guarantee proper participation of all civil society organisations; urges the Commission, therefore, to step up and structure its monitoring of the situation of civic space in the Member States by creating a ‘European civic space index’ based on existing frameworks for measuring civic space, and by dedicating to civic space a fully-fledged chapter including country recommendations in its annual rule of law report.
2022/02/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the EU has planned a period of unprecedented levels of spending and investment under NextGenerationEU, which will also create significant links with the private sector, therefore making it even more crucial for the EU institutions to have a decision-making process founded on full transparency and on the most stringent ethical rules in order to prevent conflicts of interest and corruption cases;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas according to the Ombudsman, the Commission’s failure to finalise a ‘sustainability impact assessment’ (SIA) before concluding the negotiations on a trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur constituted maladministration; whereas the Ombudsman’s findings confirmunderlined that the Commission had disregarded its own guidelines on the use of SIAs and violated the principles set out in Article 21 TEU, which also apply to trade policy;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 32 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Q. whereas the Commission’s strategy in dealing with petitions refers to its 2016 Communication entitled ‘EU law: Better results through better application’, whose rules establish no administrative procedure or practice concerning petitions; whereas the Commission’s approach, resulting in its systematic refusal to take action on individual petition issues and on petitions concerning areas under Article 6 TFEU can amount to maladministrationis at odds with the provisions of Article 227TFEU and is creating frustration and disappointment for citizens, undermining at the same time the possibility to identify systematic shortcomings regarding EU law occurring in Member States;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 49 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. EncourageSupports the Ombudsman to continue performingin her work to ensure that citizens can fully exercise their democratic rights by, inter alia, directly participating in and following in detail the decision-making process within the EU institutions, as well as by having access to all the relevant information as also stipulated by the CJEU’s case law;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 54 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Ombudsman to adoptWelcomes the Ombudsman’s action when it comes to requests on the Commission to provide public access to documents related to recovery and resilience plans of Member States, which are of significant public interest, relating to unprecedented amount that will be allocated under Next GenerationEU; welcomes that the Commission has already made extensive material about the Recovery and Resilience Facility available; stresses that more transparency and strengthened oversight ofby the implementation of the rules and procedures concerningrelevant authorities is needed in this respect, including strengthened oversight by EU Ombudsman of the administrative procedures concerning the EU funds; calls on the EU Ombudsman to explore, together with ENO members, other possible actions within their competence on supervision of the allocation and use of EU funds under NextGenerationEU, in order to protect Union citizens’ rights against possible conflicts of interest and corruption cases, as well as violations of the rule of law, contributing to ensuring the integrity, full transparency and democratic accountability of the EU institutions;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 58 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. DeeplyUnderlines that the transparency of the legislative process represents a core element of any representative democracy; regrets the fact that the Council’s current practices with regard to its decision- making process are still marred by a lack of transparency; deplores the fact that the Council is persisting in preventing citizens from having direct and timely access to its legislative documents, while the legislative process is ongoing, in breach of citizens’ right to participate effectively in the decision-making process;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 62 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates its call for the publication of all trilogue documencalls that the European Parliament in its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU 1a supported the Ombudsman’s proposals on legislative transparency; calls on the Council to improve further legislative transparency, particularly by recording and publishing Member State positions and by making available more trilogue documents; urges the Council to step up its transparency efforts in order to uphold citizens’ democratic rights, as full transparency at all stages of the legislative process, including in the informal negotiations between the three main EU institutions, is crucial to enabling citizens to hold their elected representatives and governments accountable; _________________ 1a P8_TA(2019)0045
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 64 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Notes that in the context of wider strategic work on the response of the EU administration during the COVID-19 crisis, the Ombudsman examined also the work of the Council; encourages the Council to follow the suggestions for improvement of its work that the Ombudsman put forward 1a; _________________ 1a Decision in strategic inquiry OI/4/2020/TE on the transparency of decision making by the Council of the EU during the COVID-19 crisis
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 68 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to ensure an approval process for ‘active substances’ in pesticides, which is fully transparent and free from conflicts of interest, committing to put an end to the use of all synthetic pesticides by 2035 at the latest, as well as immediately prohibiting the export of pesticides that have been banned in the EU and stopping the import of foodstuffs produced outside the EU using such unsafe chemicals; notes that the European Citizens' Initiative entitled 'Save Bees and Farmers' has gathered over 1 million signatures across the EU and that this initiative calls for a phase- out of synthetic pesticides in the EU, for measures to restore biodiversity, and for support for farmers to transition to sustainable agriculture; asks the Ombudsman to continue investigating the systems in place at EU level to make sure that the current policies and procedural safeguards in this field guarantee the highest levels of human health and environmental protection, and that the collection and examination of scientific evidence is fully transparent, accurate and free from conflicts of interest;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 73 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Ombudsman to launch an inquiry on the Commission’s strategic approach in dealing with petitions, as its action is only limited to issues it considers of strategic importance or which reflect structural problems, founded on an arbitrary methodology and vague criteria, which can breach citizens’ right to good administration and is at odds with the Commission’s duty to oversee the correct application of EU law throughout the Union, arising from Article 17 TEUtherefore excluding individual cases;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 75 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Strongly criticises the Commission for its failure to finalise the SIA before concluding the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations; underlines that this meant that the Commission concluded the negotiations without appropriate and updated informarecalls the Parliament’s position abouthat the potential social, environmental and economicsocial impacts of the proposed agreement and without properly taking into account the views of all stakeholders, which must represent an additional reason to stop the adoption offree trade agreements must be thoroughly assessed prior to the conclusion of trade negotiations; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts with regards to the shared pre-ratification commitments between the EU and the EU-Mercosur trade agreementcountries, particularly in the area of climate change and deforestation ;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 79 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Criticises the decision of those Member States, which held the Presidency of the Council, to use corporate sponsorship, as it causedentails serious damagereputational risks to the EU’s image, stressing the importance for the future to refrain from any sponsorship; considers paramount the adoption of the most stringent rules preventing such practices from taking place with a view to safeguarding the reputation and integrity of the Council and of the EU as a whole;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 84 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Commends the Ombudsman’s work to protect EU citizens’ right to access documents held by the EU institutions; considers it paramount to guarantee full transparency and full public access to the documents held by the EU institutions in order to ensure the highest levels of protection of the democratic rights of citizens and their trust in EU institutions; believes that revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/20012 must take place as a matter of priority; regrets the fact that EU legislation on access to documents is very much obsolete, thereby also hampering the Ombudsman’s activities on this matter; _________________ 2 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 98 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Notes that there was a slight increase of the number of complaints addressed to the European Ombudsman during the past years, which shows that more citizens are now aware of the existence of the institution and the very useful work it does to defend public interest;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 99 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Welcomes the fact that in 2020, the average length of the inquiries of cases closed by EU Ombudsman was 5 months, an improvement compared to the previous year where it stood at 7 months;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 100 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20 c. Notes with satisfaction that 57% of the cases were closed in 2020 in less than 3 months and the cases for which it takes up to 18 months to be solved represented only 1% , while it was 10% in the previous year and 27% in 2013; appreciates therefore the efforts to solve the issues raised by the citizens and calls on all concerned institutions to respond to requests from the Office of the European Ombudsman in a timely manner;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 101 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20 d. Notes that the number of complaints that are outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate has remained relatively stable throughout the years (1420 in 2020, 1330 cases in 2019, 1300 cases in 2018); notes that, according to the 2020 Report, most of these complaints do not concern the EU administration; welcomes the efforts of the Office to better inform citizens about the European Ombudsman’s mandate; points out at the same time the need to improve communication and awareness about the various forms of complaints citizens can use at national and European level; stresses the role the Parliament and its Members should also play in this regard;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 102 #

2021/2167(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20 e. Takes note that pandemic also affected the work of European Network of Ombudsmen(ENO); appreciates the initiative of the European Ombudsman to organise online meetings with a view to sharing experiences and promoting best practices in the crisis response; encourages further cooperation between the members of EON, including in the area of promoting future parallel inquiries;
2021/10/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas, following the entry into force of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027, the Commission published a roadmap and launched a public consultation with a view to aligning the Financial Regulation, where appropriate, with the rules agreed by the legislator as part of the MFF 2021-2027 package, and to proposing limited and targeted improvements required by the evolving situation, for instance following the COVID-19 crisis or in the context of the growing opportunities for digitalisation, as well as improvements regarding crisis management, administrative simplifications for EU funds recipients, and protection of EU financial interests in accordance with the general principles embedded in the Union Treaties, in particular the values laid down in Article 2 TEU, as well as in accordance with the principle of sound financial management enshrined in Article 317 TFEU and in the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 18 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the revision should seek to modernise the rules applicable to the EU budget in line with its latest evolutions and in line with the budgetary principles, and to increase respect of the EU values, protection of the financial interests of the EU, parliamentary oversight, democratic accountability and the ability to respond to citizens’ needs quickly, particularly in times of crises;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 22 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that, while a global overhaul of the rules applicable to the budget is not needed at this time, the Financial Regulation must be subject to targeted improvements; red tape reduction and simplifications, in particular where they increase transparency and democratic scrutiny; increase the accessibility to the EU funding for the citizens, SMEs, local and regional authorities;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 31 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the number and scope of off-budget instruments have grown significantly in the past decade, and that NGEU has taken this practice to the next level, by greatly, if temporarily, increasing the magnitude of the EU budget in the form of external assigned revenue, and creating liabilities until 2058 through borrowing for lending and borrowing for direct EU expenditure; warns that these developments put at risk central budgetary principles such as unity and budgetary accuracy, equilibrium and universality; notes that NGEU, financed through the EU budget is the largest amount the EU has ever proposed to redress its economy after the impact of COVID-19 pandemic; expresses its confidence that in crises, innovative instruments like NGEU will be used in order to enable the European Union to act and support its Member States; invites the Commission to propose a more transparent system of governance for the off-budget instruments, that involves both arms of budgetary authority, the European Parliament and the Council; warns that the risks of fraud and misuse of these funds is significant; calls that the modifications of the Financial Regulation should reinforce the link between NGEU- funded recovery measures and the EU's objectives and values;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 57 #

2021/2162(INI)

8. Calls for the revision of reporting requirements on the Commission’s debt management strategy, including maturity and schedule of payments and including the role of new own resources in the repayment of the debt, to adapt them to the increased complexity and risk of borrowing and lending operations;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 68 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the clear link between respect for the rule of law and the efficient implementation of the Union budget in accordance with the article 2 TEU and the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness, as laid down in the Financial Regulation; recalls that, upon adoption of the Conditionality Regulation, Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed to consider including the content of the Conditionality Regulation into the Financial Regulation upon its next revision and urges the Commission to make this proposal; calls on the Commission to examine possibilities to strengthen coherence between the two instrumenall EU instruments that allow the protection of the financial interests of the Union, the respect of the EU values and rule of law, including the recommendations from the rule of law reports;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 77 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that it is important to know who benefits from EU funds in order to protect the financial interests of the EU and to detect fraud, corruption and conflicts of interest in particular; notes that data for identifying economic operators and their beneficial owners is not easily, or not at all, accessible12 ; considers that the centralisation of the information in a single, interoperable EU database with information on direct and ultimate beneficiaries would overcome the identified fragmentation and lack of transparency; notes that digitalisation of the management of EU funds coupled with a comprehensive definition of conflict of interest at the European level will increase the efficiency for the protection of the financial interests of the EU; _________________ 12Study on the largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds, requested by the CONT Committee, PE 679.107 - May 2021.
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 83 #
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 84 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Regrets that the Commission did not plan to conduct an impact assessment for the modification of the Financial Regulation, despite that while the proposal will only target specific modifications, there is no clear evidence that the final text of this revision or future modifications cannot have any direct economic, environmental and social impacts; recalls that according to the European Court of Auditors, an impact assessment could have provided clear information on the accessibility of EU funds for EU citizens, which the revision of the Financial Regulation needs to improve;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 113 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new)
Climate mainstreaming
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 114 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Emphasises that the rules of implementation of the budget must reflect a clear methodology for climate mainstreaming that allow for effective and efficient tracking of funds used in tackling climate change for both climate mitigation and adaptation strands; requests the Commission to introduce the necessary provisions in the Financial regulation; the modifications should also be consistent with the modifications made so far to help the tracking of climate spending in the EU budget;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 115 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 b (new)
Tracking of biodiversity spending
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 116 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Underlines the importance of accurate monitoring of expenditure contributing to halting and reversing the decline of biodiversity, on the basis of an effective, transparent and comprehensive methodology to be set out by the Commission, in cooperation with the European Parliament and the Council; calls on the Commission to speed up its work in this regard and introduce provisions related to the biodiversity spending tracking in the Financial regulation;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 122 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. SuggeInsists that the Financial Regulation be revised to guarantee the appropriate role of Parliament in the setting up, supervision and scrutiny of any new trust fund, including in the drawing up of the constitutive agreement and the mobilisation of the Union’s contribution, the implementation, continuation and possible liquidation; reiterates that Parliament should be involved as observer, and able to monitor the activities of the governing bodies of a trust fund; stresses that timely, regular and figure- based information on the implementation of a trust fund is essential to allow Parliament to exercise its democratic oversight and scrutiny role;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 126 #

2021/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Union trust funds bring clear visibility for the Union and to raise awareness of their results and achievements by reinforcing provisions on efficiency incommunication to citizens and stronger synergies between the communication activities, in a similar vein as on the ESI funds;
2021/10/06
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 5 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that lockdown has had a considerable impact on mobility demand and the choice of transport mode, especially in urban areas; notes that the social distancing introduced as part of sanitary measures in the EU has led citizens to take up mobility options other than public transport in order to avoid gatherings of people, leading also to an increasing use of private cars and the increase in CO2 emissions related to this;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 11 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. - 1a. Underlines that urban areas are home to nearly three quarters of the EU’s population which has led to an increased demand for urban mobility resulting in safety issues, severe congestion, poor air quality, noise emissions and high levels of CO2 emissions;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. -1b. Points out that the transport sector has been among the most severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, stresses however that the transport sector has played a vital role in maintaining essential connectivity and in delivering the critical goods and services;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 28 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. StressesBelieves that COVID-19 crisis has shown the need for new urban planning and mobility solutions in order to make urban areas more resilient and adaptable to mobility demand and it should be an occasion to reduce transport congestion and greenhouse emissions; stresses, in this respect, the need for local authorities to reengineer public transport in order to ensure safe, healthy and environmentally sustainable commuting options and to complement public transport with on- demand and shared transport services, as well as to adapt the infrastructure and reorganise the management of space to include active mobility and sustainable freight;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 34 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need for local authorities to reengineer public transport in order to ensure safe, healthy and environmentally sustainable commuting options and to complement public transport with on-demand and shared transport services; stresses, in this regard, the particular role of guided transport, a social mode of mass transport which is compatible with demanding health control standards;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 45 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a revision of the Commission guidelines on developing and implementing sustainable urban mobility plans to include a new objective to improve the resilience of mobility systems in case of rapid fluctuations in mobility demandRecalls that the EU has actively promoted the concept of sustainable urban mobility planning for several years and is committed to supporting national, regional and local authorities during the process of developing and implementing Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans(SUMPs), including through funding instruments and technical expertise; calls for a revision of the Commission guidelines on developing and implementing sustainable urban mobility plans to include a new objective to improve the resilience of mobility systems in case of rapid fluctuations in mobility demand; calls furthermore to include provisions on reinforced cooperation, information exchange and sharing of best practices among municipalities to improve public and private transport management and increase the level of satisfaction of transport users in urban areas;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 54 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission to come up with proposals, in its upcoming revised Urban Mobility Package, to accelerate the digitalisation of urban mobility, in order to deploy Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) and to ensure the introduction of digital ticketing payments, integrated tickets, digitalisation of operations, such as touchless buttons and the sharing of real- time mobility flows;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 65 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises that urban logistics are an essential public service; calls on local authorities to develop dedicated sustainable urban logistics plans that integrate freight into the planning of more dynamic and flexible uses of curb space; calls for a reflection on the use of urban transport vehicle fleets for other uses related to urban logistics, in particular at night; stresses, furthermore, the potential in urban areas of using cargo bikes, which are energy-efficient and can relieve road congestion;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 66 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises that urban logistics are an essential public service, such as postal, delivery vehicles and garbage trucks, are an essential public service which increased demand requires new space for more frequent and safe stops of logistics operators; calls on local authorities to develop dedicated sustainable urban logistics plans, including clear policies on loading and unloading area, that integrate freight into the planning of more dynamic and flexible uses of curb space;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 72 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to engage with cities and Member States to ensure that all large cities that are urban nodes on the TEN-T network put in place their own sustainable urban mobility plans by 2030 and believes that the Commission should support also all other local authorities that are willing to do so; urges moreover the Commission to propose legislation requiring Member States to collect and submit regularly relevant data on urban mobility;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 74 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recalls that for the 2014-2020 period, the EU, provided some €16.5 billion for urban mobility, mainly for clean transport (metro and tramway), but also for cycle paths and intelligent transport systems; stresses such EU- funded projects should always be based on comprehensive multi-annual urban mobility strategies;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 79 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States and local authorities to reassess their investments in urban mobility and to give priority to digital infrastructure that will improve the general experience of all passengers, including people with reduced mobility, and be adapted to the post- COVID-19 needs of transport workers;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 104 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls that the urban tourism has played an essential part in creating the design for urban policies; points out that most of EU cities that have suffered from tourism’s drawbacks following the outbreak of the pandemic and they had to search for new and more sustainable modi operandi to restore tourism, leading to an intense use of new digital technologies, that have allowed to better manage urban spaces and the movement of the urban tourists in order to prevent the formation of large groups and risky situations in the context of pandemic;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 118 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates that sustainable development and the management of urban tourism need to be fully integrated into the wider urban agenda and calls on the Commission to take tourism into account when drawing the new Urban Mobility Package.
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 124 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that ensuring better accessibility to public space for people with reduced mobility should be a priority in public road planning policies; warns, in this regard, of the degradation caused by free-floating scooters being dumped on public roads;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 126 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Recalls that, in terms of volume, cities are the main locations for European tourism; stresses, therefore, the need to plan the mobility offer with specific services for travel related to tourism and other services for everyday mobility;
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 129 #

2021/2075(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Notes the widespread use of restricted traffic areas in European cities as a means of limiting air pollution; calls for further development of urban and shared mobility to compensate for the use of private cars in cities.
2021/10/01
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
— having regards to its resolution of 10 June 2021 on the rule of law situation in the European Union and the application of the Conditionality Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/20921a _________________ 1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2021)0287.
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 11 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Commission decided to abide by the non-binding European Council conclusions of December 2020 and declared that it would develop guidelines for the application of the Regulation;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 13 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas, in its resolution of 25 March 2021 on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092, the rule-of-law conditionality mechanism, Parliament requested the Commission to adopt the guidelines no later than 1 June 2021 and after having consulted Parliament;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 26 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that guidelines are not legally binding; notdeplores that the Commission is deviating from its usual practice of drafting guidelines for the application of a legal act only in cases where the actual implementation of the act over a certain period of time shows the need for guidance;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 29 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Strongly regrets the Commission’s failure to respond to Parliament’s request and to adopt its guidelines by 1 June 2021; reiterates its call on the Commission to draft the guidelines as soon as possible in close cooperation with Parliament ; reminds the Commission that Parliament already started the necessary preparations for potential court proceedings under Article 265 of the TFEU against the Commission;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 35 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. UDeplores the time wasted by the Commission since the entry into force of the Regulation; urges the Commission to avoidct without any further delay in the application of the Regulation and to investigate swiftly and thoroughly any potential breaches of the principles of the rule of law in the Member States that affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget or the protection of the financial interests of the Union in a sufficiently direct way; reiterates that the situation in some Member States already warrants immediate investigation under the Regulation;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 41 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. AskRequests the Commission to report to Parliament on a quarterly or semi-annual basis regarding new and ongoing cases under investigation, starting as soon as possible with the first cases;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 44 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises that any violation of the rule of law principle has to be seen as an attempt to put in danger the impact of the Union funds in the life of our citizens; therefore there cannot be a violation of the rule of law principle without a direct link to qualitative or quantitative violation of the the financial interests of the Union;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 45 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Draws attention to the non- regressive clause for the respect of the rule law established recently by the European Court of Justice: calls therefore for the Commission to evaluate the national rules that are regressive and can put in jeopardy the sound financial management and the financial interests of the Union; Court of Justice of 20 April 2021, Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru, C-896/19, EU:C:2021:311
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 46 #

2021/2071(INI)

6 a. Calls on the Commission to clarify in the guidelines that breaches of the rule of law in a Member state which result from decisions or events that took place prior to 1 January 2021 still fall within the scope of the regulation as long as their effect is still ongoing;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 51 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Draws particular attention to the list of indicative breaches of the principles of the rule of law laid down in Article 3 of the Regulation; calls onurges the Commission to investigate potential occurrences of the breaches included in that list in the Member States, while pointing out that other practices or omissions by public authorities may also be relevant;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 54 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Recalls the importance of the cooperation between the EU institutions, the Member States and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Public Prosecutor`s Office (EPPO); welcomes that EPPO became operational on 1 June 2021 and highlights its crucial role in ensuring the effective functioning of the management and control systems for EU funds in the participating Member States;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 57 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Recalls that for the citizens of these Member States that do not take part in EPPO, OLAF remains the only competent body to investigate allegations of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union; urges therefore the Commission to assess the compliance by the Member States with the OLAF Regulation;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 58 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Recalls that for the financial interests of EU to be effectively protected, all Member States should complete and be part of the EPPO enhanced cooperation as swiftly as possible;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 59 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7 d. Urges the Commission to assess the compliance by the Member State with EPPO; points out that any political delaying of selection procedure of the european delegated prosecutors by the Member States should be seen as an attempt to jeopardise the activity of EPPO in the respective country and a potential danger of misuse of the public money;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 64 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Considers that the Commission’s annual Rule of Law report constitutes an objective, impartial, fair, and qualitative assessment of breaches of the principles of rule of law; believes that where the conclusions of the annual reports highlight individual or systemic breaches of the rule of law which affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget or the protection of the financial interests of the Union in a sufficiently direct way, they should be directly linked to the triggering of the conditionality mechanism; calls on the Commission to clarify, in the guidelines, a methodology to create a clear and direct link, when relevant, between the annual reports and the conditionality mechanism;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 67 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Highlights that civil society, including independent NGOs and citizens, is at the forefront to identify potential breaches of the rule of law at local and national level, and should therefore be involved in their reporting; calls on the Commission to establish, in the guidelines, an efficient, user-friendly, and easily accessible online one-stop shop for citizens and civil society to report both fraud and corruption cases related to EU Funds, as well as individual or systemic breaches in their Member State, guaranteeing anonymity and leading, where deemed relevant by its services, to further investigations by the OLAF, the EPPO or the Commission;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 80 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that measures under the Regulation are necessary in particular in cases where other procedures set out in Article 7 TEU, in the Common Provision Regulation (CPR), in the Financial regulation or in other sector-specific or financial legislation would not allow the Union budget to be protected more effectively; stresses that this does not mean that the Regulation is to be considered as a ‘last resort’, but rather that the Commission can use a wide range of procedures to protect the Union’s financial interests, to be chosen on a case- by-case basis depending on their efficiency and effectiveness;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 82 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Recalls the complementarity principle between the conditionality regulation and other procedures set out in Union legislation; calls on the Commission to use all the tools available for better protecting the EU values and the financial interests of the Union, such as triggering the conditionality regulation and starting infringement procedures against the violation of the rule of law principle based on the recent case-law of European Court of Justice;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 91 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that ‘systemic’ breaches, for instance those affecting the functioning of the justice system, the independence of judges or the neutrality of public authorities, have in general a clear inand direct impact on the proper management, spending and control of Union funds;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 98 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Believes that transparency is essential to foster the confidence of Member States and citizens in the conditionality mechanism: points out that each step of the procedure of the Regulation should therefore be taken in a fully transparent way;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 99 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Calls on the Commission to set up, in the guidelines, the transparency rules and principles that it will apply when triggering the Conditionality Mechanism;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 100 #

2021/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Believes that transparency implies, in particular: - disclosing the sources used by the Commission to trigger the Mechanism, - disclosing the content of the written notifications sent to the Members States, - disclosing the answers received from the Member States and the remedies proposed, - disclosing the Commission’s assessment leading to the potential lifting of adopted measures under the Mechanism, - keeping the European Parliament informed and involved at every step of the process to ensure the democratic scrutiny of the Mechanism and of EU funds;
2021/06/17
Committee: BUDGCONT
Amendment 3 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the high number of petitions received from citizens concerned about the breaches of the rule of law in their respective countries and with the consequences of such breaches on their lives; stresses that full protection of Union citizens’ rights can be ensured throughout the Union only if all Member States comply with all the principles underlying the rule of law, as deficiencies in one Member State have an impact on other Member States and the Union as a whole; stresses that inadequate implementation of rule of law principles jeopardises EU objectives in all policy areas, thus creating an environment where legislation indifferent policy sectors cannot be executed in a correct and timely manner;highlights in this regard the responsibility of the EU institutions in assisting and monitoring the application of the rule of law by Member States
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2021/2025(INI)

1 a. Invites the Commission to provide in its further reports an assessment of the impact of identified deficiencies and breaches on the subsequent allocation of the EU funds under the conditionality mechanism; stresses the crucial role of rule of law enforcement tools in achieving effective implementation of the values enshrined in Art.2 TEU; calls, therefore, on the Commission to guarantee effective operationalisation of the Report findings in concrete policy actions; calls on the Commission to provide a higher level of visibility of NGOs contributions and public consultation results when drafting its future Reports;
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 15 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that more fact-finding missions need to be organised to assess the major rule of law concerns in relevant Member States;
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 31 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. HCalls on the Commission to continue to assess rigorously and objectively whether press freedom is respected in all Member States; highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed the importance of strengthening independent journalism and access to pluralistic information as key enablers of rule of law and democratic accountability able to provide citizens with fact-checked information, thereby contributing to the fight against disinformation; deplores the fact that in a number of Member States, journalists have increasingly faced physical threats and online harassment, especially female journalists; regrets that such attacks often lead to self-censorship and undermine citizens' right to information;
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 33 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed the importance of strengthening independent journalism, whistleblower protection and access to pluralistic information as key enablers of rule of law and democratic accountability able to provide citizens with fact-checked information, thereby contributing to the fight against disinformation; deplores the fact that in a number of Member States, journalists have increasingly faced physical threats and online harassment, especially female journalists;
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 44 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that the Court of Justice of the European Union recently ruled2 that civil society organisations must be able to operate without unjustified interference by the state, acknowledging that the right to freedom of association constitutes one of the essential bases of a democratic and pluralist society; is seriously concerned that some NGOs active in the area of migration and LGBTI+ rights are subject to smear campaigns, and face severe restriction of the civic space where they can operate.; deplores the stillpersistent phenomenon of strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP); highlights that politicisation in public procurement undermines good governance and underlines that the activities of NGOs and CSOs are crucial in countering this malpractice; believes that strong safeguard measures must betaken to prevent this phenomenon from occurring; _________________ 2Judgment of 18 June 2020, Commission v Hungary, C-78/18, EU:C:2020:476, paragraphs 112 and 113.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Underlines the necessity to raise awareness among the EU citizens and residents on the means and procedures available at national and EU level to safeguard the respect of the rule of law and to report its breaches, with petitions to the European Parliament being one of such instruments; underlines that the redress of justice for those who became victims of the rule of law breaches is an essential element of building trust towards institutions and must be guaranteed by the Member States; invites in this regard the Commission to provide concrete recommendations to the responsible authorities in order to compensate the impacted individuals for the breaches of their fundamental rights.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 47 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Regrets that freedom of association and the shrinking space for civil society are not part of the 2020 report; reiterates that civil society is essential for democracies to flourish and that shrinking space for civil society contributes to violations of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights; reiterates that the Union institutions should maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 49 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Regrets that the application of Co- operation and Verification Mechanism still prevents some EU citizens from fully benefitting of the area of freedom, security and justice.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 50 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Highlights that adequate rule of law standards should be guaranteed for the EU citizens and residents during their exercise of freedom of movement rights within the EU; stresses that social and medical protection, as well as effective access to justice, must be fully guaranteed to seasonal workers and cross-border workers when they pursue their professional activity in another Member State.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 51 #

2021/2025(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Highlights that the capacity of the EU and its Member States to uphold the rule of law determines its international image and the credibility in promoting rule of law, democracy and human rights in third countries; warns about the risk of the interference of third countries in all democratic processes at EU level through, inter alia, international corruption schemes, which jeopardise the rule of law in the EU; stresses that EU citizens living in third countries must be treated with respect to the rule of law in their interaction with the authorities in their MS, as well as with EU authorities.
2021/04/20
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 5 June 2020 on “EU Waterborne Transport Sector – Future outlook: Towards a carbon-neutral, zero accidents, automated and competitive EU Waterborne Transport Sector”1b, _________________ 1b Document 7976/20
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 13 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 15 November 2018 on Inland Waterway Transport – “See its potential and promote it!,”1a _________________ 1a Document 15144/18
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas European countries have a variety of different fleets of inland vessels, which makes inland waterway transport very convenient and useful for transporting different types and large quantities of cargo to different destinations on either large or small rivers, canals and lakes;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 24 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, the total share of cross- border freight by our inland waterways is 54% on the Rhine-Alpine corridor, 35% on the North Sea-Mediterranean corridor and even 38% on the North Sea-Baltic corridor and whereas it is important to advance the completion of the TEN-T inland waterways core network as well the connection to the comprehensive network;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 29 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the modal shift objectives of the 2011 White Paper on transport1c have not been reached; _________________ 1c28.03.2011 White Paper Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 35 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas drought and climate change are among the major problems for European inland waterway transport. In several European regions, inland waterway transport was hard hit by the long drought period in 2018 with extremely low water levels; whereas the consequences were devastating for the Rhine and its tributaries, the Upper and Middle Danube and the Upper and Middle Elbe; whereas in Germany, this led to a decline of EUR 5 billion in industrial production; whereas furthermore, in Northern Europe, the inland water areas are frozen during the most severe winter months and the traffic season has to be stopped;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 38 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the modal shift from road to inland waterways not only concerns freight but also passenger transport - notably in urban areas. As 50% of the EU population lives close to the sea and along rivers, inland waterway passenger transport offers an environmentally friendly alternative in terms of both energy consumption and noise emissions. It also contributes to decongesting overloaded road networks and provides an alternative for road infrastructure expansion in densely populated areas;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 41 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas river cruises, ferries, water taxis and water shuttles should become a cleaner option for tourism and public transport in regions and cities with accessible and navigable rivers and canal, canals and lakes, which would make urban mobility more sustainable and effective;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 46 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas inland waterway transport could play an important role for maritime transport in terms of digitalisation development and creating scale regarding zero-emission propulsion solutions (e.g. electrification as well as hydrogen);
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 49 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the procedures to obtain a certificate for a hydrogen vessel are still very lengthy. In addition, for a series of hydrogen vessels (with exactly the same technical characteristics), applications have to be submitted for every single vessel separately. This kind of administrative burden discourages private investments and therefore slows down the technological progress and thus the improvement of cost-efficiency;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 50 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas the role of contractors in the entire supply chain is important to take into account in order to improve the business case for sustainable investments in the inland waterway transport sector;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 59 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the Commission’s intention in the Strategy for Sustainable and Smart Mobility to shift more goods from road to inland waterways and short sea shipping; stresses however the high untapped potential and manoeuvre for inland waterway transport to grow; therefore calls on the Commission to show more ambition by putting the modal shift goals for inland waterway transport on the same level as rail (i.e. a raise of 50% by 2030 and a twofold increase by 2050);
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 62 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that regional and (inter-) urban freight transport and logistics by inland waterways should be encouraged in countries and regions where this could become a valuable alternative in order to accomplish the much needed modal shift; in this regard, stresses that investments are needed in more flexible and innovative ship designs and in the greening of the existing inland waterway transport fleet in order to become a serious competitive alternative to road transport;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 67 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that more investment in updating river and canalphysical and digital waterway infrastructure (for example, locks, bridges and interoperable deployment of digital technologies across borders) is key in order to maintain the reliability of inland waterway transport and boost the competitiveness of the sector, while respecting the applicable environmental law;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 82 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that there is not a ‘one size fits all’ solution for tackling the problem of low water levels as a result ofwhich could worsen due to climate change effects; deplores, however, that the problems of the inland waterway sector, caused by the low water levels, have not been taken duly into account while solutions are available; therefore stresses that coherent action needs to be taken, such as fleet adaptation (type of ships, quantity of fleet, spare capacity), optimisation of ship design, taking into account the inland waterway vessel’s versatility, better infrastructure management and development, improved water level information and forecasting as well as cooperation with rail during low water periods, time-charter contracts for vessels which are able to operate during low water tide periods, implementation of digital tools and increasing storage capacity in ports;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 89 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission, Member States' public authorities and stakeholders to cooperate, in order to take the necessary measures to ensure a climate resilient, future proof, year-around and flexible inland waterway infrastructure taking into account aspects and possibilities of multimodality; considers that national and international authorities managing inland waterways should be fully mobilised in the adoption and implementation of any measure aimed to tackle extreme climate conditions in order to enable year round navigation;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 102 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the importance of further encouraging and supporting initiatives aimed at the use of alternative fuels and propulsion methods for shipping in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality; points out, in this regard, the value of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a transitional solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants in inland waterway transport; notes that the existing, technically mature vessels and distribution infrastructure now based on LNG could be used for biogas and will therefore be essential in scaling up Bio-LNG as a marine fuel;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 113 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that low-emission and zero-emission alternatives should become more financially attractive than conventional propulsions and that this trend should be accelerated, for example by a realistic, progressively increasing blending percentage based on an impact assessment; considers furthermore that Member States should have the opportunity to set a decreasing or zero tax rate for the use of shore-side electricity and zero-emission fuels;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 115 #

2021/2015(INI)

5a. Stresses that a European emission labelling scheme for IWT that ensures availability of information on the energy performance of ships, promotes energy efficiency and creates a stable environment for investment decisions, should be assessed; highlights that this scheme must aim to effectively reduce emissions and assist the sector by providing improved access to funding, loans and guarantees based on its emission performance, improve emission monitoring, create benefits by incentivising port authorities to differentiate port infrastructure charges, ultimately raising the sector's attractiveness as a whole;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 119 #

2021/2015(INI)

6a. Believes that in view of our climate goals, the shipping sector is able to offer more sustainable and future-proof transport; stresses that public authorities should play a connecting and coordinating role in this development phase and engage with all interested stakeholders, including users of inland waterways and the shipbuilding industry; therefore stresses that support for innovation, a European financing plan, the facilitation of certification and permission to sail on alternative fuels are therefore strongly needed;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 124 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Highlights that greening the fleet should focus on reducing other sources of pollution as well, as the pollution of rivers is not limited to CO2 emissions only; therefore, highlights the importance of providing waste discharge facilities in ports as well as promoting the use of innovative anti-fouling paint and advanced hull maintenance technology (e.g. underwater drones);
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 128 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls on the Commission to provide a practical guide and toolbox on the possibilities of sustainable fuel options and technologies for inland waterway and short sea ships in order to support ship- owners in their decision-making; highlights that it should focus on inland waterway and short sea ship types given their similar technical characteristics;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 130 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that far-reaching digitalisation and data collection contributes to a cleaner environment and improved safety on board and result in more efficient routing and better communication and information exchange between ships, ports and infrastructure; stressespoints out that digitalisation could bring significant benefits for the collection and analysis of data related to the inland waterway transport sector, for the safety and for energy efficiency reasons, contributing to further emission reduction; stresses in this regard the need to further harmonise River Information Services (RIS), which wouldaiming to solve the problems arising from different interpretations of technical standards and the lack of comparable data, and underlines the need to prepare for interoperable data exchange with other modes of transport;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 135 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to ensure a harmonised digital use and acceptance of electronic crew and vessel documents throughout the EU as soon as possible, which ensures improvement of the efficiency and attractiveness of inland waterway transport and its smooth interaction and integration with other transport modes and increases interoperability of data exchange systems in the context of the entire logistics chain;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 138 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the importance of using space data and services for inland waterway transport services, leading to a safer, more sustainable, efficient and competitive sector; considers that in particular new Galileo, EGNOS and Copernicus services should be included in the review of the ITS Directive and other smart mobility legislative initiatives;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 139 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Stresses the importance of collecting data on the European logistics system in coordination with relevant stakeholders in preparation for the Combined Transport Directive proposal and other measures leading to more efficient logistics planning and use of physical infrastructure; moreover, calls on the Commission to come up with an intermodal overview on the flow of goods and containers entering Europe as well as the routes the goods follow to their end destination as this could help when drawing up effective modal shift policy;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 147 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that increased automation brings the reality of synchromodal transport in Europe closer; insists therefore on the need for a European Roadmap for Smart and Autonomous Inland Waterway Transport Systems that supports research, the development and successful implementation of smart ships and ports, and digital interoperability; calls on the Commission, based on an impact assessment and a broad consultation with all relevant stakeholders, to consider the necessary revisions of all related legislation in order to facilitate the uptake of autonomous shipping, particularly concerning the responsibilities of crew in emergencies or system failure, clarification of liability issues in case of damages, and more in general on the safety aspects of autonomous vessels, in order to achieve a certain level of harmonisation at EU level1d; stresses that this would help to ensure the safety of autonomous vessels and thereby increase the uptake of the technology across Europe; insists therefore on the need for a European Roadmap for Smart and Autonomous Inland Waterway Transport Systems that supports research, the development and successful implementation of autonomous ships, smart ports, and digital interoperability, as well as ensures the deployment of remote vessel control and remote lock management; in this regard, stresses the need for smart infrastructure as well as the necessary training, up- skilling and re-skilling of crew, which could be supported under the social investments and skills window in the InvestEU programme; _________________ 1dEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) 2021 Report ‘Waterborne transport in Europe - the role of Research and Innovation in decarbonisation - An analysis of waterborne transport, based on the Transport Research and Innovation Monitoring and Information System(TRIMIS)’, p. 53. Furthermore, preliminary results from the Horizon 2020 EGNSS Hull-to-Hull (H2H) project show that the EU navigation systems EGNOS, Copernicus and Galileo contribute to improving navigation decisions and conditions for autonomous vessels: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/775998 /results.
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 154 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Boosting the modal shift should be considered as a priority as sea containers are currently not always efficiently transported from a seaport to the hinterland leading to higher costs and longer travel times; calls on the Commission to conduct research and promote the use of algorithms and artificial intelligence in container hinterland transport for an optimal planning and processing of containers;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 165 #

2021/2015(INI)

10. Stresses the role of inland ports as strategic, multimodal nodes in the logistics system; stresses, therefore, that inland ports as well as sea ports should have efficient connections, including rail infrastructure, with a focus on connecting to the TEN-T core and comprehensive corridornetworks where possible;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 168 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Highlights that close cooperation between the different inland ports (e.g. on sustainability), creates further possibilities for cost and operational efficiency improvements and has a positive effect on regional development and employment; considers that projects of a cluster of ports should be given priority with regards to funding;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 172 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights that the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure should take into account the potential demand and market characteristics of a port; stresses, therefore, that a European rollout strategy of alternative fuels for multimodal use through the TEN-T revision and Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (AFID) should follow a network approach that leads to an efficiently planned infrastructure, based on the potential market demand characteristics of a port and, where necessary, along water routes; moreover stresses the potential of a flexible infrastructure system, e.g. including mobile generators;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 178 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to promote the concept of Life Cycle Assessment with the goal to start a dialogue and to encourage inland ports to design integrated management systems for water, energy, waste, construction sites, spatial planning and urban green areas;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 195 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the need to encourage the project development of innovative inland waterway vessels and the corresponding port infrastructure under the Horizon Europe Partnership on zero-emission waterborne transport;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 196 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importanceHighlights the possibility of existing EU funding instruments for greening and digitalising our European inland waterway transport sector, such as the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), Horizon Europe and the Structural and Cohesion Funds, and the need to mobilise them to finance investments in alternative fuels and adequate ships and infrastructurthe development and roll-out of alternative propulsion systems for vessels and the necessary infrastructure; stresses, however, that these funding instruments are not suitable for SMEs, family businesses and other micro-sized enterprises, carrying the risk that these smaller projects are not eligible;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 204 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Highlights that the path towards a zero-emission inland waterway sector and the needed energy transition will create a funding gap approaching EUR 10 billion1e, which cannot be financed by the sector alone; moreover, highlights the absence of a business case for private vessel owners to invest in zero-emission propulsion technologies; therefore, stresses the need to mobilise public support and private investments; _________________ 1e DST, “Assessment of technologies in view of zero-emission IWT“, Edition 1, part of the overarching CCNR study “Financing the energy transition towards a zero-emission European IWT sector“, Report No. 2293, p. 95 https://www.ccr- zkr.org/files/documents/EtudesTransEner /Deliverable_RQ_C_Edition_1_Oct2020.p df
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 210 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that the inland waterway sector consists mostly of SMEs, family businesses and smaller ports, which makes it difficult for them to make expensive investments in order to comply with the goals of the Green Deal; considers, therefore, that the administrative burden and cost for access to funding should be significantly reducshould be significantly reduced and access to funding improved;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 216 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. CTherefore, calls on the Commission to set up a dedicated European inland waterway fund, including a one-stop-shop system that is easily accessible for help and assistance and has the possibility to combine projects into a single application, thus increasing the chances for funding; stresses that the fund should be financed through the reserve funds created under Regulation (EU) 546/20149 , where possible complemented with national funds and contributions, and should provide for the possibility of blending with the CEF and the Structural and Cohesion Funds and national funds where possible; _________________ 9 OJ L 163, 29.5.2014, p. 15.
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 217 #

2021/2015(INI)

16a. Stresses that the Fund should focus on ship retrofitting and renewal aiming to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investments in innovative and energy saving technologies as well as port infrastructure, notably the deployment of alternative fuels, contributing to the objectives of the Green Deal, a green recovery and a more sustainable transport system as a whole;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 222 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls that the European Investment Bank (EIB) provides funding for attractive capital loans, including the shipbuilding industry; considers, however, that the realisation and the effectiveness of EIB funding depends on its accessibility; therefore, insists on: a) ensuring that the Green Shipping Guarantee Programme of the EIB should also be applicable to smaller transactions including more flexible loan conditions, e.g. taking into account the average ship’s service operational life in the payback period; b) ensuring that the EIB provides both pre-delivery financing and post-delivery financing for shipbuilders, in order to guarantee the implementation and the viability of innovative shipbuilding projects; c) funding of research and innovation programmes for green shipbuilding becoming a priority;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 229 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Highlights the untapped potential of inland waterways in urban areas as confirmed in the Strategy for Sustainable and Smart Mobility; stresses that urban areas become more and more congested and building new road infrastructure is not always cost efficient; calls on the Commission to come up with concrete proposals aiming to increase logistics over our inland waterways - boosting the modal shift;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 233 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Highlights that 2019 figures for passenger transport demand revealed that the European river cruise sector, including day-trip vessels and ferry services, was in a healthy state before the COVID-19 pandemic and came to an almost complete standstill in the first half of 2020 due to the current health situation resulting in a negative economic impact and financial difficulties for companies, and it remains uncertain whether passenger traffic will return to normal in 20211f; therefore calls on the Commission to include inland waterway tourism in its upcoming European Agenda of Tourism 2050 in order to facilitate a business case for a sustainable, innovative and resilient recovery of river tourism, taking into account the economic impacts of river tourism on port regions in terms of added value, employment creation and port revenues; _________________ 1f https://inland-navigation- market.org/chapitre/8-outlook/?lang=en
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 235 #

2021/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Calls on the Member States to accept the international Certificate for the Operation of a Pleasure Craft by adopting Resolution 40 of the UNECE Inland Transport Committee, in order to allow the cross-border recognition of licences and to facilitate recreational navigation within Europe;
2021/04/30
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 8 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is being confronted with new trends and challenges in automation that could have a huge impact on road safety; whereas the growing phenomenon of distraction by mobile devices needs to be addressed; whereas some technological advances, connectivity and automation, create new road safety opportunities to reduce or compensate for human errors; whereas in the near future, the presence of both vehicles with a wide range of automated/connected features and traditional vehicles in mixed traffic will pose a new riskchallenges, especially for vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 10 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas automation as well as the sharing economy provide new opportunities to tackle congestion especially in urban areas; whereas developing the synergies between safety and sustainability measures in urban areas, could lead to less CO2 emissions, improved air quality, reduced congestion;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 13 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the share of road deaths of vulnerable road users is increasing, as car users have been the main beneficiaries of improved vehicle safety and other road safety measures; whereas the safety of motorbike riders, cyclists and pedestrians must be urgently addressed;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 23 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas achieving the new EU road safety targets requires more intensive and cooperative efforts to develop strong European road safety policies with stakeholders, research and innovation support, in order to prepare policy based solutions based on solid data and impact analysis, increased and targeted enforcement measures at national level and effective cooperation on cross- border enforcement of penalties;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 32 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the EU has reaffirmed in the 2021-2030 EU road safety policy framework its long-term visionstrategic goal to get close to zero deaths and zero serious injuries on European roads by 2050, known as Vision Zero, and its medium- term goal to reduce deaths and serious injuries by 50 % by 2030; highlights that these EU goals and targets relating to road safety should be underpinned by a coordinated, well- planned, systematic and well-financed road safety approach at EU, national, regional and local level;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 34 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes in this regard the adoption of the safe system approach at EU level, based on a performance framework and timed targets for the reduction of casualties and serious injuries; welcomes the setting up of key performance indicators (KPIs) established in cooperation with Member States to enable a more focused and targeted analysis of the Member States’ performances and to identify shortcomings; recalls onthat the Commission to set outcome targets by 2023unication “Europe on the Move – Sustainable Mobility for Europe: safe, connected and clean” in 2018 confirmed the EU's long-term goal of moving to zero fatalities in road transport by 2050 and added that the same should be achieved for serious injuries; highlights that the same communication proposed new interim targets of reducing the number of road deaths by 50% between 2020 and 2030 as well as reducing the number of serious injuries by 50% in the same period, as recommended in the Valletta Declaration; underlines the importance of the ongoing cooperation between the EU and the Members States in this regard and urges all Members States to fully commit to this exercise and agree on a harmonised methodology for KPIs that will allow Member States to be comparedcompare data; stresses the importance of promoting best national practices, in order to improve harmonisation and to bring together the existing different national approaches to road safety;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 39 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Commission to extend the programme “EU Road Safety Exchange” aiming at improving the road safety performance, currently focusing on six Member States to all EU Member States;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 41 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to further promote the EU funding opportunities through regional and cohesion funds, the Connecting Europe Facility and the “Safer Transport Platform” launched by the European Investment Bank (EIB); stresses the importance of funding and making the eligibility criteria clearer for road safety actions also through future EU instruments, such as Invest EU and CEF2 Regulation; aiming at accelerating the delivery of road safety results; furthermore, calls on all Member States to earmark an adequate part of their national budget, which, coupled with EU funds, should make it possible to implement their national road safety programmes and the new 2021-2030 EU Road Safety Policy Framework;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 49 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to prioritise investments with the greatest benefit in terms of road safety, including investments in maintaining existing infrastructure and in the construction of new infrastructure; welcomes, in this regard, the launch of the Safer Transport Platform initiative and calls on all interested parties to considerthe Commission and the EIB to consider launching awareness-raising and information campaigns in order to ensure that all interested parties are well informed about the conditions of its use;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 55 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that a proactive assessment of the EU road network will be a useful tool to assess the in-built safety of roads and to target investment; welcomes, in this regard, the risk mapping and safety rating of motorways and primary roads introduced in the recently revised EU infrastructure safety rules4 and calls on the Member States to designate as many primary roads in their territory as possible to increase the road safety potential of the new directive; calls on the Commission and the Member States to agree as soon as possible on a methodology to carry out systematic network-wide road assessments as mandated in the revision of the above- mentioned act; highlights the importance of using infrastructure to introduce self- explaining, self-enforcing roads, specifically in dangerous zones, or zones with a prevalence of vulnerable road users for the safety of all participants in road traffic; recalls the importance of the performance of road signs and markings, including their placing, visibility and retro-reflectivity, especially for the good functioning of driver assistance systems, such as Intelligent Speed Assistance and Lane Keeping Assistance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to speed up the work on the specifications at EU level for the performance of road signs and markings in order to prepare the way for a higher level of automation in vehicles; reminds that according to the Commission’s impact assessment, these new rules have the potential to save up to 3200 lives and avoid 20 700 serious injuries by 2030; _________________ 4Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 amending Directive 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management, OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1.
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 63 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission to continue working closely with the Member States to define a KPI for road infrastructure, indicating the safety quality of a road network independent of road user behaviour or vehicle technology, based on agreed common rating methodology;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 79 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the recent revision of the General Safety Regulation, which will make new advanced safety features in vehicles such as intelligent speed assistance and emergency lane keeping systems mandatory in the EU as from 2022, with the potential to save around 7 300 lives and avoid 38 900 serious injuries by 2030; calls on the Commission to adopt ambitious and timely secondary legislation, to evaluate future developments and to review the regulation where appropriate in order to keep pace with technical developments; in this regards, recalls the importance of innovation in vehicle technology, which can both help mitigate the severity of crashes and reduce the likelihood of crashes through active and passive safety features;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 84 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls upon the Member States to provide tax incentives and to encourage insurers to enable the purchase and use of safe cars;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 92 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission, in line with the TRAN implementation report on the road safety aspects of the Roadworthiness Package, to take due account of the technical progress in vehicle safety features provided for in new General Safety Regulation and to include advanced safety systems in the scope of the next revision of the Roadworthiness Package to ensure they are checked during periodical technical inspections; in this regard, calls on the competent authorities to ensure additional trainings, upskilling and re-skilling of the related inspectors conducting the PTIs.
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 96 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to propose a new harmonised regulatory framework for automated cars in order to ensure, by means of comprehensive tests, including real driving conditions, that automated cars will operate in an absolutely safe manner for their drivers and other road users, in particular concerning their interaction with conventional vehicles and vulnerable road users; in this regard, highlights the importance of ensuring training and qualification to be brought up to date and equip drivers with the necessary skills and knowledge to drive automated vehicles as they emerge onto the market in the coming years;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 114 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that safe road use ( speed, driving without alcohol and drugs, undistracted driving, safety belt and child restraint use, helmet use) is the third pillar for the prevention and mitigation of fatalities and serious injuries in collisions, showing that the human factor in road safety plays a crucial role; notes that according to a Commission study, alcohol is estimated to be involved in around 25 % of all road fatalities, while drugs are involved in 15 % of road fatalities5 ; notes that the EU recommendation on permitted blood alcohol content dates from 2001; calls the Commission to include a zero- tolerance drink-driving limit in its recommendations, and to introduce an EU recommendation for zero tolerance regarding illicit psychoactive drugs and standards on roadside drug-driving enforcement; calls on the Commission to also include in the revised recommendations guidance on the fitting of alcohol interlock devices, with a special focus on repeat offenders, high- level first- time offenders and all professional drivers; in this regards, calls on the Commission to consider the feasibility and the added value of elaborating a harmonised system of mutual recognition of driving disqualifications and of penalty points between Member States, where it exists. _________________ 5Commission study of 18 February 2014 on the prevention of drink-driving by the use of alcohol interlock devices.
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 121 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that speeding is a key factor in around 30 % of fatal road crashes and an aggravating factor in most crashes; calls on the Commission to come up with a recommendation to apply safe speed limits in line with the safe system approach for all road types, such as maximum speeds of 30km/h in residential areas and areas where there are high numbers of cyclists and pedestrians, or where there could be potential to increase cycling and walking levels, and to assess the feasibility of limiting the maximum top speed of all new vehicles as an effective way of reducing road casualties, as well as air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 134 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls that the Driving Licence Directive established a harmonised EU licence model and introduced minimum requirements for obtaining licences; notes that the directive will need to be kept up- to-date regarding new technological developments in vehicle and infrastructure technology and vehicle automation; calls on the Commission to consider introducing a graduated licencing system that encourages novice drivers to gain more experience while limiting certain high-risk activities such as driving at night and with passengers; note, while taking into account the mobility needs of people living in areas with cloncern that cases of irregular issuing of driving licences have been reported in several Member States and calls on the Commission to monitor this issueg distances and limited access to public transport; notes that driver licencing, targeted education and awareness raising, supported by strong and sustained compliance and enforcement regimes, have an important role to play in giving road users the capability and willingness to use roads and vehicles safely;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 160 #

2021/2014(INI)

16. Highlights the importance of fast and effective post-crash care in significantly reducing the consequences of injury; calls on the Member States, in this context, to establish closer collaboration between their road safety authorities and the health sector, to make it mandatory to build emergency lanes and to enforce their correct use to speed up rescue operations; calls onfurther the Commission to considerand the Member States to provide for sufficient financing for efficient emergency infrastructure, including air medical services; calls on the Commission to makinge first aid training compulsory in the future revision of the Driving Licence Directive; recalls the importance of effective follow- up victim support;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 169 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that poor enforcement of road traffic rules undermines efforts to achieve Vision Zero; encourages the Member States to set annual targets for enforcement and compliance in their road safety plans and to ensure their adequate funding; underlines that only well- explained and, well-publicised consistent enforcement activities and education by enforcement can have a long- lasting effect on driving behaviour;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 186 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Underlines that the manipulation and fraud in electronic safety features, such as advanced driving assistance systems, represent a high safety risk and need therefore to be addressed by specific training on the control of software integrity provided to inspectors;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 191 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission, in view of the upcoming revision of the Urban Mobility Package, to promote synergies between safety and sustainability measures in urban areas; calls, in this regard, for the reprioritisation of transport infrastructure in dense urban areas away from individual motorised transport towards public transport and sustainable, safer and healthier transport modes such as walking and cyclingsustainable, safer and healthier transport modes such as public transport, walking and cycling, taking into consideration the special needs of vulnerable road users, such as children, persons with disabilities and elderly persons; encourages further investments and co-funding by EU funding instruments for parking and other mobility connectivity zones in the entry of urban areas, providing for easy access to different modes of public transport, in view of reducing urban congestion and CO2 emissions;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 208 #

2021/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Is of the view that in order to properly implement the next steps in the EU road safety policy under the overarching Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, some new capacities are needed in the field of road safety, in particular with respect to the coordination, monitoring and evaluation functions and technical support for the overall strategy; calls on the Commission in this regard to explore options to further support safe road transport under an existing agency or another bodto consider establishing a European Road Safety Agency;
2021/04/20
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 10 #

2021/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. HighlightStresses that funding needs to be accessible for associations, NGOs, local and small civil society organisations that work most closely with girls and womenwhich are helping girls, women and LGBTIQ people in all their diversity; emphasises the key role of the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument and stresses that administrative and implementation barriers should be avoided, since they might hamper the involvement of the most relevant actors; recalls the urgent need for significant funding for sexual and reproductive health and rights;
2021/05/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2021/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the increased level of support for gender-responsive budgeting, the creation of specific gender indicators and the collection of gender-disaggregated data; expects the Commission to closely monitor the implementation of The Gender Action Plan III and to consult Parliament on the monitoring system;
2021/05/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 45 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) According to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Union is committed to ensuring a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. The Preamble of the Aarhus Convention provides for the right of every person to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being and Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides that a high level of environmental protection must be integrated in EU policies.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 48 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) ECHR's case law only provides for indirect protection of the right to a healthy environment by sanctioning only environmental violations that simultaneously result in an infringement of other human rights already recognized in the European Convention on Human Rights.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 49 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 b (new)
(1 b) EU citizens expressed concerns in a number of petitions delivered to the European Parliament on the disruptions and deterioration of environment demanding the right to live in a healthy environment and access to justice in environmental matters.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 61 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The effective investigation, prosecution and adjudication of environmental criminal offences should be improved. The list of environmental criminal offences which were set out in Directive 2008/99/EC should be revised and additional categories of offences based on the most serious breaches of Union environmental law should be added. Provisions on sanctions should be strengthened in order to enhance their deterrent effect as well as the enforcement chain in charge of detecting, investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating environmental criminal offences. Overleniency with regard to the punishment of environmental crimes leads to a situation where the fines received for violation of environmental law represent a small fraction of the profits and could be regarded as a cost of doing business and results in an unfair competition to legally operating businesses.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 82 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The environment should be protected in a wide sense, as set out under Article 3 (3) TEU and Article 191 TFEU, covering all natural resources - air, water, soil, wild fauna and flora, including habitats - as well as services provided by natural resour, ecosystems and species populations - as well as prudent and rational use of natural resources and ecosystem services.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 102 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Sanctions for the offences should be effective, dissuasive and proportionate. To this end, minimum levels for the maximum term of imprisonment should be set for natural persons. Accessory sanctions are often seen as being more effective than financial sanctions especially for legal persons. Additional sanctions or measures should be therefore available in criminal proceedings. These should include the obligation to reinstatefully cover the cost of restoration of the environment, exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions and withdrawal of permits and authorisations. This is without prejudice to the discretion of judges or courts in criminal proceedings to impose appropriate sanctions in the individual cases.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 104 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Where national law provides for it, legal persons should also be held criminally liable for environmental criminal offences according to this Directive. Member States whose national law does not provide for the criminal liability of legal persons should ensure that their administrative sanctioning systems provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate sanctions types and levels as laid down in this Directive in order to achieve its objectives and that the criminal prosecution of natural person acting in the name of a legal entity is enabled. Financial situation of legal persons should be taken into account to ensure the dissuasiveness of the sanction imposed.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 110 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17 a) Lack of national rescue and sanctuary capacity may contribute to the lack of enforcement of relevant provisions related to wildlife trade by a Member State and result in measures inadequate to deter wildlife crime, such as administrative sanctions, without seizure. Dissuasive sanctions, collaboration and exchange between governmental and non- governmental sanctuaries and rescue centres to secure long term and species- appropriate solutions for seized wildlife is needed.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 113 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Member States should lay down rules concerning limitation periods necessary in order to enable them to counter environmental criminal offences effectively, without prejudice to national rules that do not set limitation periods for investigation, prosecution and enforcement. Given the seriousness of the respective conduct, there should be no limitation period for the criminal offence of ecocide and for the criminal offence which has affected natural ecosystem established as a legal entity.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 125 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) According to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Union is committed to ensuring a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment, inter alia by application of the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) Environmental criminal offences harm nature, economy and society. By reporting breaches of Union environmental law, peopleindividuals and organisations perform a service of public interest and play a key role in exposing and preventing such breaches, and thus safeguarding the welfare of society. Individuals in contact with an organisation in the context of their work-related activities are often the first to know about threats or harm to the public interest and the environment. Persons who report irregularities are known as whistleblowers. Potential whistleblowers are often discouraged from reporting their concerns or suspicions for fear of retaliation. Such persons should benefit from balanced and effective whistleblowers protection set out under Directive (EU) 2019/1937of the European Parliament and of the Council25 . _________________ 25 Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305/17).
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 127 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The Union continues to be concerned with the rise in environmental criminal offences and their effects, which undermine the effectiveness of Union environmental legislationresult in lost opportunity costs, in harm or loss of ecosystem services, habitats and species, undermine the effectiveness of Union environmental legislation and by undercutting legal prices might create unfair competition to legally operating businesses. Improved environmental standards by legislation aiming at high level of protection of environment and human health in some cases lead to increased costs for businesses, in particular in cases of inelasticity of price in the sector, and potentially raises the attractiveness of illegal operations1a. These offences are moreover increasingly extending beyond the borders of the Member States in which the offences are committed. Such offences pose a threat to the environment and therefore call for an appropriate and effective response. _________________ 1a Broadening the Toolbox for the Prevention of Illegal Waste Trafficking, to Address Emerging Threats, Suvantola, Leila ; Kankaanranta, Terhi, Environmental policy and law, 2018-04- 02, Vol.48 (1), p.64-74.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 138 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The effective investigation, prosecution and adjudication of environmental criminal offences should be improved. The list of environmental criminal offences which were set out in Directive 2008/99/EC should be revised and additional categories of offences based on the most serious breaches of Union environmental law should be added. Over leniency with regard to the punishment of what might have been seen as minor environmental crimes, results in a situation where the fines received for violation of environmental law represent a small fraction of the profits and could be regarded as a cost of doing business. Provisions on sanctions should be strengthened in order to enhance theirhave a deterrent effect as well as to adequately support the enforcement chain in charge of detecting, investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating environmental criminal offences as well as to give a signal that it makes economic sense to comply with the environmental acquis.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) To ensure an effective, integrated and coherent enforcement system that includes administrative, civil and criminal law measures, Member States should organise internal cooperation and communication between all actors along the administrative and criminal enforcement chains and between punitive and remedial sanctioning actors. Following the applicable rules, Member States should also cooperate through EU agencies, in particular Eurojust and Europol, as well as with EU bodies, including the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), in their respective areas of competence. The review of Directive 2017/1371 should introduce environmental crime to the list of criminal offenses covered by the Directive. Extension of the EPPO’s mandate to cover environmental crimes in accordance with Article 86(4) TFEU, is needed to effectively tackle these crimes in the EU.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 141 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The Directive should provide a clear sentencing guidance to the authorities. Member States should criminalise offence categories and provide for greater precision on the definitions of the offence categories, and harmonisation concerning sanction types and levels.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Member States should provide for criminal penalties in their national legislation in respect of serious infringements of provisions of Union law concerning protection of the environment. In the framework of the common fisheries policy, Union law provides for comprehensive set of rules for control and enforcement under Regulation (EC) No 1224/200921 and Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 in case of serious infringements, including those that cause damage to the marine environment. Under this system the Member States have the choice between administrative and/or criminal sanctioning systems. In line with the Communication from the Commission on the European Green Deal22 and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 203023 , certain intentional unlawful conduct covered under Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 and Regulation (EC) 1005/200824 should be established as criminal offences. _________________ Similarly, the common agricultural policy1a provides for penalties, in the area of both interventions covered and not covered by IACS, and those related to conditionality rules, jointly aiming for safeguards for environment and prudent and rational use of natural resources. This Directive provides for establishing criminal sanctions in case of serious non- compliance with the respective provisions. _________________ 1a COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/2289 of 21 December 2021 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the presentation of the content of the CAP Strategic Plans and on the electronic system for the secure exchange of information 21 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (OJ L 112, 30.4.2011, p. 1–153). 22 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS The European Green Deal, COM/2019/640 final. 23 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives, COM/2020/380 final 24 Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999, (OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1– 32).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) A conduct should be considered unlawful also when it is carried out under an authorisation by a competent authority in a Member State if such authorisation was illegal, if it was obtained fraudulently, or by corruption, extortion or coercion. An authorisation that has breached the relevant EU legislation, independently of the eventual result of the given authorisation is as well considered unlawful. Moreover, operators should take the necessary steps to comply with the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions concerning the protection of environment applicable when they carry out the respective activity, including by complying with their obligations, as laid down in applicable EU and national laws, in procedures governing amendments or updates to existing authorisations.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 155 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The environment should be protected in a wide sense, as set out under Article 3 (3) TEU and Article 191 TFEU, covering all natural resources - air, water, soil, wild fauna and flora including habitats - as well as services provided by natural resour, ecosystems and species populations - as well as prudent and rational use of natural resources and ecosystem services.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in order to combat environmental crime, assist the proper implementation and enforcement of environmental legislation and to help protect the environment more effectively.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 159 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) The acceleration of climate change, biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, paired with tangible examples of their devastating effects, have led to the recognition of the green transition as the defining objective of our time and a matter of intergenerational equity. Therefore, when Union legislation covered by this Directive evolves, this Directive should also automatically cover any updated or amended Union legislation falling within the scope of criminal offences defined under this Directive, when the obligations under Union law remain unchanged in substance. However, when new legal instruments prohibit new conduct harmful to the environment, this Directive should be amended in the respective part in order to add to the categories of criminal offences also the new serious breaches of Union environmental law adopted after this Directive will have come into force.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – paragraph 1
The conduct shall be deemed unlawful even if carried out under an authorisation or an approved planning instrument by a competent authority in a Member State when the authorisation or an approved planning instrument was in breach of the Union environmental legislation, or it was obtained fraudulently or by corruption, extortion or coercion;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 167 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) ´illegal logging´ means any logging which breaks rules and legislation in force and is not limited to cases which involve products or commodities within the scope of Regulation (EU) No995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council or [ Regulation on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010], including conduct of a local, regional or national forest authority infringing on EU law in sphere of nature protection or on a law implementing EU strategic initiative in the sphere of nature protection;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 174 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Sanctions for the offences should be effective, dissuasive and proportionate. To this end, minimum levels for the maximum term of imprisonment should be set for natural persons. Accessory sanctions are often seen as being more effective than financial sanctions especially for legal persons. Additional sanctions or measures should be therefore available in criminal proceedings. These should include the obligation to fully cover the cost to reinstate the environment, exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions and withdrawal of permits and authorisations. This is without prejudice to the discretion of judges or courts in criminal proceedings to impose appropriate sanctions in the individual cases.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 176 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Where national law provides for it, legal persons should also be held criminally liable for environmental criminal offences according to this Directive. Member States whose national law does not provide for the criminal liability of legal persons should ensure that their administrative sanctioning systems provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate sanctions types and levels as laid down in this Directive in order to achieve its objectives, and that the criminal prosecution of natural person acting in the name of a legal entity is enabled. Financial situation of legal persons should also be taken into account to ensure the dissuasiveness of the sanction imposed.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) A further approximation and effectiveness of sanction levels imposed in practice should be fostered through common aggravating circumstances that reflect the severity of the crime committed. Where the death of, or serious injury to, a person, have been caused and where these elements are not already constituent for the criminal offence, these could be considered as aggravating circumstances. Equally, when an environmental criminal offence causes substantial and irreversible or long-lasting damage to an entire ecosystem, this should be an aggravating circumstance because of its severity, including in cases comparable to ecocide. As the illegal profits or expenditure that can be generated or avoidAs the illegal profits, expenditure that can be generated or avoided and a competitive advantage gained through environmental crime are an important incentive for criminals, these should be taken into account when determining the appropriate level of sanctioning in the individual case.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) When an environmental criminal offence causes substantial and irreversible or long-lasting damage to an entire ecosystem, this should be considered comparable to or qualifying as an offence of ecocide.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 183 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Where the crimes are of a continuing nature, they should be brought to an end as soon as possible. Where offenders have made financial gains, such gains should be confiscated. The Directive also lays down the rules for the management of the confiscated gains.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) authorisation or the execution of plan or project referred to in Article 6(3) of Council Directive 92/43/EEEC without an appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives, referred to in the same Article;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 185 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Lack of national rescue and sanctuary capacity may contribute to the lack of enforcement of relevant provisions related to wildlife trade by a Member State and result in measures inadequate to deter wildlife crime, such as administrative sanctions, without seizure. Dissuasive sanctions, collaboration and exchange between governmental and non- governmental sanctuaries and rescue centres to secure long term and species- appropriate solutions for seized wildlife are needed.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 185 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(d b) authorisation or the execution of the plans or projects authorized without the conditions of the exemption under Article 4(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC having been met;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 187 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Member States should lay down rules concerning limitation periods necessary in order to enable them to counter environmental criminal offences effectively, without prejudice to national rules that do not set limitation periods for investigation, prosecution and enforcement. Given the seriousness of the respective conduct, there should be no limitation period for the criminal offence of ecocide and for the criminal offence, which has affected natural ecosystem which is established as a legal entity.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 187 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) concerns hazardous waste as defined in Article 3(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council39 and is undertaken in a non-negligible quantity; _________________ 39 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3–30).
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 191 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Furthermore, judicial and administrative authorities in the Member States should have at their disposal a proper guidance, allowing for a range of criminal sanctions and other measures to address different types of criminal behaviour in a tailored and effective manner, with an adequate level of harmonisation at EU level to ensure effective cross-border cooperation, to prevent dual criminality and prevent that low enforcement and low penalties levels in a Member State negatively affect the implementation of this Directive.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Given, in particular, the mobility of perpetrators of illegal conduct covered by this Directive, together with the cross- border nature of offences and the possibility of cross-border investigations, Member States should establish jurisdiction in order to counter such conduct effectively. enable the competent authorities to investigate and prosecute such activities, including where an offence is committed, by means of information and communication technology, from their territory, whether or not such technology is based in their territory. Member States should also strengthen inter-agency cooperation between financial investigators and environmental crime agencies, to detect and pursue financial investigations into environmental crimes. This includes working with foreign counterparts to share information, facilitate prosecutions and recover assets that are moved and held abroad1a. _________________ 1a inter-agency cooperation proposed in the 2021 report Money Laundering from Environmental Crime by The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), available at https://www.fatf- gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Mo ney-Laundering-from-Environmental- Crime.pdf
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) the abstraction of surface water or groundwater which causes or is likely to cause substantial damage to the ecological statusthat the long- term annual average rate of abstraction exceeds the available groundwater resource; or the abstraction or anthropogenic alteration which the groundwater body is subject to which might result in a significant diminution in the status of associated surface waters, or a significant damage to terrestrial ecosystems which depend directly on the groundwater body, or subject to alterations to flow direction resulting from level changes which cause saltwater or potential of surface water bodies or to the quantitative status of groundwater bodies; her intrusion, and indicate a sustained and clearly identified anthropogenically induced trend in flow direction likely to result in such intrusions1a; _________________ 1a from the definition of good quantitative status in the Water Framework Directive
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 198 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) the killing, destruction, taking of, possession, sale or offering for sale of a specimen or specimens of wild fauna or flora species listed in Annexes IVA, B and V (whenC to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97, species listed in Annex VIV and V (when population of species are subject to the same measures as those adopted for species or populations in Annex IV) to Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 and the species referred to in Article 1 of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council50 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity of such specimens; _________________ 49 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7–50). 50 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7–25).
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 199 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) trading in specimens of wild fauna or flora species or parts or derivatives thereof listed in Annexes A and B to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/9751 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity of such specimens; _________________ 51 Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1).
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 202 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) the placing or making available on the Union market of illegally harvested timber or of timber products that were made of illegally harvested wood, falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council52 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity; [If a Regulation on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 is adopted before this Directive, point (n) to be replaced with a criminal offence within the scope of Article 3 of that Regulation.] _________________ 52 Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market (OJ L 295, 12.11.2010, p. 23–34).
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 203 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) Environmental criminal offences harm nature, economy and society. By reporting breaches of Union environmental law, peopleindividuals and organisations perform a service of public interest and play a key role in exposing and preventing such breaches, and thus safeguarding the welfare of society. Individuals in contact with an organisation in the context of their work-related activities are often the first to know about threats or harm to the public interest and the environment. Persons who report irregularities are known as whistleblowers. Potential whistleblowers are often discouraged from reporting their concerns or suspicions for fear of retaliation. Such persons should benefit from balanced and effective whistleblowers protection set out under Directive (EU) 2019/1937of the European Parliament and of the Council25 . _________________ 25 Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305/17).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(n a) illegal logging;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 208 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n b (new)
(n b) incompliance with sustainability criteria pursuant Art. 29 of Directive (EU) .../….[recast RED];
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 210 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n c (new)
(n c) committing an infringement within the meaning of Article 90 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 211 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n d (new)
(n d) committing incompliance with respect to legality and regularity of operations financed by the EAGF and EAFRD and incompliance with conditionality rules, in accordance with the Regulation (EC)No 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 217 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) To ensure an effective, integrated and coherent enforcement system that includes administrative, civil and criminal law measures, Member States should organise internal cooperation and communication between all actors along the administrative and criminal enforcement chains and between punitive and remedial sanctioning actors. Following the applicable rules,Potential perpetrators are generally legal actors given legitimacy as a consequence of various societal structures, e.g. paying tax on corporate earnings, providing jobs, being established within government policy structures, and political considerations arguably dictate that these might be treated sympathetically by justice systems and policy1a. Supervisory agencies might be under pressure to maintain good relationships with the companies they regulate, and to support local economic health2a. Member States should therefore also cooperate through EU agencies, in particular Eurojust and Europol, as well as with EU bodies, including the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti- Fraud Office (OLAF), in their respective areas of competence. , by setting up national contact points. The review of Directive 2017/1371 should propose an inclusion of environmental crime to the criminal offenses covered by the Directive and an extension of the EPPO’s mandate to cover serious environmental crimes, via the European Council in accordance with Article 86(4) TFEU, is needed to effectively tackle these crimes in the EU. _________________ 1a Nurse, Angus: Contemporary Perspectives on Environmental Enforcement International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2022-03, Vol.66 (4), p.327- 344 2a Environmental and Wildlife Crime in Sweden from 2000 to 2017, Stassen, Richard ; Ceccato, Vania; Favarin, Serena, Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 2020-08, Vol.36 (3), p.403-427.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that theany conduct referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), (p) (ii), (q), (r), irrespective of its lawfulness under a law, an administrative act or regulation of a Member State, also constitutes a criminal offence, when it is committed win the at least serious negligence. wareness that it causes or likely to cause substantial damage to the environment.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 223 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States may establish their jurisdiction over the offence of ecocide for the most serious offences under Article 3(1) and Article 3 (2), namely, unlawful or wanton conduct committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by that conduct.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 224 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Substantial damage shall be determined when the cost of reinstatement of the damage caused by an offence referred to in the points (a) to (e), (g) to (j), (k), (p), (q), (r) of Article 3(1) and Article 3(2) equals to more than EUR 10 000 or an advantage of more than EUR 10 000. Member States shall ensure that their national legislation specifies that the following elements shall be taken into account, where relevant, when assessing whether the damage, advantage gained or likely damage is substantial for the purposes of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of offences referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (e), (i), (j), (k) and (p):
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 228 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in order to combat environmental crime, assist the proper implementation and enforcement of environmental legislation and to help protect the environment more effectively.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 232 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Negligible quantity may be considered when the cost of reinstatement of the damage caused by an offence referred to in the points (e), (f), (l) to (o) of Article 3(1) involves the value of less than EUR 10 000 or an advantage gained of less than EUR 10 000. In this case Member States may provide for sanctions other than criminal sanctions. Member States shall ensure that their national legislation specifies that the following elements shall be taken into account when assessing whether the quantity is negligible or non-negligible for the purposes of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of offences referred to in paragraph 1, points (e), (f), (l), (m), (n):
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 235 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) a law, an administrative regulation of a Member State or a decision taken by a competent authority of a Member State that gives effect to the Union legislation referred to in point (a) or to the Union´s strategic initiative in the field of environment.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 239 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – paragraph 1
The conduct shall be deemed unlawful even if carried out under an authorisation by a competent authority in a Member State when the authorisation was obtained fraudulently or by corruption, extortion or coercion;or under an approved planning instrument when the authorisation or a planning instrument was in breach of the Union environmental legislation, or it was obtained fraudulently or by corruption, extortion or coercion. Authorisation given by a national official, breaching the Union environmental legislation, irrespective of the eventual result of the obtained authorisation, shall also be deemed an unlawful conduct for the purpose of this Directive.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 242 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt to commit any of the criminal offences referred to in Article 3 (1) points (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), (p) (ii), (q), (r) when committed intentionally is punishable as a criminal offence.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 244 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) ´´illegal logging´ means any logging which breaks rules and legislation in force and is not limited to cases which involve products or commodities within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council or [ Regulation on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010], including conduct of a local, regional or national forest authority infringing on EU law in sphere of nature protection or on a law implementing EU strategic initiative in the sphere of nature protection;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 245 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘legal person’ means any legal entity having such status under the applicable national law, except for States or public bodies exercising State authority and for public international organisations;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 248 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
(3a) 'national public official' means any person holding an executive, administrative or judicial office at national, regional or local level;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 253 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
(4a) ‘offering for sale’, ‘sale’ and ‘trade’ have the meaning attributed to them in Article 2, points (i), (p), and (u) of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 and also cover offering for sale, sale and trade that occur online, irrespective of the place of establishment or residence of the providers of the intermediary online services and of the traders;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
(4b) ‘placing on the market’ means supplying or making available, whether in return for payment or free of charge, to a third party1a, includes customs release for free circulation in the Union2a and also covers the placing on the market occurring online. Import shall be deemed to be placing on the market3a; _________________ 1a Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council 2a Regulation (EU) No 517/20146 of the European Parliament and of the Council 3a Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 255 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) obligation to reinstate the environmentfully cover the cost of restoration of the environment with restoration to be executed by contracted experts within a given time period;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 259 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) fines proportionate to the cost of restoration of the impacted area and to the financial advantage accrued by committing the offence;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 265 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Liability of legal persons under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators, inciters or, accessories or act in the name of a legal entity in the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 270 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the obligation to reinstate the environmentfully cover the cost of restoration of the environment, with restoration to be executed by contracted experts within a given time period;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 271 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(i a) withdrawal of offender's ownership right to the property acquired illegally or from illegal income, which is in relation to the committed crime;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 276 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that offences referred to in Article 3(1) points (a) to (j), (n), (q), (r) are punishable by fines, the maximum limit of which shall be not less than 15% of the total worldwide turnover of the legal person [/undertaking] in the business year preceding the fining decision.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 277 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that offences referred to in Article 3(1) points (k), (l), (m), (o), (p) are punishable by fines, the maximum limit of which shall be not less than 3% of the total worldwide turnover of the legal person [/undertaking] in the business year preceding the fining decision.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 278 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the following conduct constitutes a criminal offence when it is unlawful and, committed intentionally or with serious negligence:
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 281 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the discharge, emission or introduction of a quantity of energy, materials or substances or ionising radiation into air, soil or water which causes or is likely to cause death or serious injury to any person or substantial damage to the quality of air, the quality of soil or the quality of water, or to animals or plants;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 285 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the offence was committed within areas awarded strict protection, the core area of national parks, Natura 2000 sites, UNESCO World heritage sites;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 287 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the offence was committed in the framework of a criminal organisation within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA56 or was committed simultaneously with other criminal offence, including murder and intentional homicide; _________________ 56 Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime, OJ L 300/42.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 289 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) the offence is of a repetitive nature;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 290 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) the offender has actively proceeded with the unlawful conduct after the date an infringement procedure in the respective policy area related to the activity of the offender had been launched by the European Commission;
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 299 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) authorisation or the execution of plan or project referred to in Article 6(3) of Council Directive 92/43/EEEC1a without an appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives, referred to in the same Article; _________________ 1a Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 300 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) authorisation or the execution of the plans or projects authorized without the conditions of the exemption under Article 4(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC1a having been met; _________________ 1a DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 302 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. For the crimes comparable to or qualifying as an offence of ecocide and crimes affecting an ecosystem that is established as a legal entity there shall be no limitation period.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 304 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
(e) the collection, transport, treatment, recovery or disposal of waste, the supervision of such operations and the after-care of disposal sites, including action taken as a dealer or a broker (waste management), when an unlawful conduct:
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 307 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) concerns hazardous waste as defined in Article 3(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council39 and is undertaken in a non-negligible quantity; _________________ 39 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3–30).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 314 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the ship-source discharges of polluting substances referred to in Article 4(1) of Directive 2005/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council42 on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties, including criminal penalties, into any of the areas referred to in Article 3(1) of that Directive, provided that the ship-source discharges do not satisfy the exceptions set in Article 5 of that Directive; this provision shall not apply to individual cases, where the ship- source discharge does not cause deterioration in the quality of water, unless repeated cases by the same offender in conjunction result in deterioration in the quality of water; _________________ 42 Directive 2005/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements (OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 11– 21).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 324 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) the abstraction of surface water or groundwater which causes or is likely to cause substantial damage to the ecological statusthat the long- term annual average rate of abstraction exceeds the available groundwater resource; or the abstraction or anthropogenic alteration which the groundwater body is subject to which might result in a significant diminution in the status of associated surface waters, or a significant damage to terrestrial ecosystems which depend directly on the groundwater body, or subject to alterations to flow direction resulting from level changes which cause saltwater or potential of surface water bodies or to the quantitative status of groundwater bodies; her intrusion, and indicate a sustained and clearly identified anthropogenically induced trend in flow direction likely to result in such intrusions1a; _________________ 1a from the definition of good quantitative status in the Water Framework Directive
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 331 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) the killing, destruction, taking of, possession, sale or offering for sale of a specimen or specimens of wild fauna or flora species listed in Annexes IVA, B and V (whenC to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97, species listed in Annex VIV and Annex V (when populations of species are subject to the same measures as those adopted for species or populations in Annex IV) to Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 and the species referred to in Article 1 of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council50 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity of such specimens; _________________ 49 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7–50). 50 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7–25).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 334 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) trading in specimens of wild fauna or flora species or parts or derivatives thereof listed in Annexes A and B, C to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/9751 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity of such specimens; _________________ 51 Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 337 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) the placing or making available on the Union market of illegally harvested timber or of timber products that were made of illegally harvested wood, falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council52 , except for cases where the conduct concerns a negligible quantity; [If; [when a Regulation on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 is adopted before this, Directive, point (n) to be replaced with a criminal offence within the scope of Article 3 and 4 of that Regulation.] _________________ 52 Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market (OJ L 295, 12.11.2010, p. 23–34).
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 340 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(na) committing an infringement within the meaning of Article 90 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/20091a of the European Parliament and of the Council; _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1)
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 341 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n b (new)
(nb) committing incompliance with respect to the legality and regularity of operations financed by the EAGF and EAFRD, and incompliance with conditionality rules2a, in accordance with the Regulation (EC) No 2021/21161a of the European Parliament and of the Council; _________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013; 2a rules related to operations and conditionalities laid down in Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 342 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n c (new)
(nc) incompliance with sustainability criteria pursuant Art. 29 of Directive (EU) .../….[recast RED];
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 343 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n d (new)
(nd) illegal logging;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 347 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o
(o) any conduct which causes the deterioration of a habitat within a protected sior the disturbance of a species for which the site has been designated, within the meaning of Article 6(2) of the Directive 92/43/EEC, when this deterioration is significant;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 358 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19 a Cooperation between Member States, Commission (OLAF) and other Union bodies Without prejudice to the rules on cross- border cooperation and mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, Member States, Eurojust, Europol, European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and the Commission shall, within their respective competences, cooperate with each other in the fight against the criminal offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4. To that end the Commission, and where appropriate, Eurojust, shall provide such technical and operational assistance as the competent national authorities need to facilitate coordination of their investigations. The EPPO shall be responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences. In that respect the EPPO shall undertake investigations, and carry out acts of prosecution and exercise the functions of prosecutor in the competent courts of the Member States.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 367 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that theany conduct referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), (p) (ii), (q), (r), irrespective of its lawfulness under a law, an administrative act or regulation of a Member State, also constitutes a criminal offence, when it is committed win the at least serious negligencewareness that it causes or likely to cause substantial damage to the environment.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 370 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may establish their jurisdiction over the offence of ecocide for the most serious offences under Article 3(1) and Article 3(2), namely, unlawful or wanton conduct committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by that conduct.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 372 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where an offence referred to in the points (a) to (e), (g) to (j), (k), (p), (q), (r) of Article 3(1) and Article 3(2) involves damage of less than EUR 10 000 or an advantage of less than EUR 10 000, Member States may provide for sanctions other than criminal sanctions. Member States shall ensure that their national legislation specifies that the following elements shall be taken into account, where relevant, when assessing whether the damage, advantage gained or likely damage is substantial for the purposes of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of offences referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (e), (i), (j), (k) and (p): :
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 373 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 a (new)
Article 27 a Amendments to Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law The title is amended as follows: Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests and cross-border protection of the environment by means of criminal law; In Article 18 a new paragraph is inserted: By December 2024 the Commission shall present a legislative proposal on inclusion of environmental crimes to the criminal offences covered by this Directive and on the creation of the office of the Green European Public Prosecutor.
2022/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 375 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) real or estimated avoided cost of compliance and the advantage gained over the legally operating business;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 376 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b b (new)
(bb) real or estimated avoided cost of compliance gained by exceedance of the permitted values, limits or parameters or by operating without the permit;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 377 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) severity of the damage e.g. expressed as a cost of restoration, and/or expressed as the timeframe needed of bringing down the exceeded values and parameters to the limit values;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 378 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) spread of the damage, including consideration of the value of the supplied ecosystem service lost or temporarily lost, and social or monetary value of specimen of wildlife affected or killed;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 395 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Where a criminal offence referred to in the points (e), (f), (l) to (o) of Article 3(1) involves the value of less than EUR 10 000 or an advantage gained of less than EUR 10 000, Member States may provide for sanctions other than criminal sanctions. Member States shall ensure that their national legislation specifies that the following elements shall be taken into account when assessing whether the quantity is negligible or non-negligible for the purposes of the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of offences referred to in paragraph 1, points (e), (f), (l), (m), (n):
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 396 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) the amount, area or number of items subject to the offence and their monetary or social value;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 398 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) the conservation status of the respective populations of fauna or flora species concerned;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 399 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(ca) the level of protection awarded to the area or species concerned (strict protection; moratorium on killing, destruction, taking of specimens of wild fauna and flora; core area of national park; UNESCO heritage site, etc);
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 401 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point c b (new)
(cb) the value of the supplied ecosystem service lost or temporarily lost
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 402 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point d a (new)
(da) the real or estimated avoided cost of compliance and/or other type of financial gains obtained by the offence.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 407 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – point d b (new)
(db) value of carbon stored in the ecosystem, including soil, emitted to the atmosphere following the damage;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 418 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt to commit any of the criminal offences referred to in Article 3 (1) points (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), (p) (ii), (q), (r) when committed intentionally is punishable as a criminal offence.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 441 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) obligation to fully cover the cost of reinstateing the environment with reinstatement to be executed by contracted experts within a given time period;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 444 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point a a (new)
(a a) civil liability in case the reinstatement is no longer possible;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 445 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point a b (new)
(ab) obligation to cover cost of placement of confiscated animals in a rescue centre or other appropriate interim facility;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 448 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) fines proportionate to the financial advantage accrued by committing the offence;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 462 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that legal persons can be held liable for offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 where such offences have been committed for their benefit by any person who has a leading position within the legal person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, based on:
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 477 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the obligation to fully cover the cost of reinstateing the environment, with reinstatement to be executed by contracted experts within a given time period;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 487 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) obligation of companies to install due diligence schemes for enhancing compliance with environmental standards where this is not a legal obligation;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 491 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable pursuant to Article 6(2) is punishable by sanctions or measures, which are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Criminal liability of an enterprise may be transferred to the successor company.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 497 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that offences referred to in Article 3(1) points (a) to (j), (n), (q), (r) are punishable by fines, the maximum limit of which shall be not less than 15% of the total worldwide turnover of the legal person [/undertaking] in the business year preceding the fining decision.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 502 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that offences referred to in Article 3(1) points (k), (l), (m), (o), (p) are punishable by fines, the maximum limit of which shall be not less than 3% of the total worldwide turnover of the legal person [/undertaking] in the business year preceding the fining decision.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 517 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the offence caused destruction or irreversible or long-lasting substantial damage to an ecosystem or to the populations of wild animals or plant species covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97, Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 519 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) outstanding natural values of the area concerned (awarded strict protection, core area of national park, UNESCO heritage site etc.);
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 522 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the offence was committed in the framework ofwithin a criminal organisation within the meaningsense of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA56 ; _________________ 56 Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime, OJ L 300/42.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 523 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the offence was committed together with other criminal offence, including intentional homicide;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 526 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the offence was committed by a national public official when performing his/her duties;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 528 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the offender committed similar previous infringements of environmental lawhas already received an admonition penalty, administrative or criminal sanction based on this Directive or Directive 2008/99/EC or based on sectoral environmental law not covered by Directive 2008/99/EC;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 534 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) the offender has actively proceeded with the unlawful conduct after an infringement procedure in the respective policy area related to the activity of the offender had been launched by the European Commission;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 547 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure frozen and confiscated assets are appropriately managed, in line with their nature, and, where possible, used to finance reparations. As applicable, Member States shall as a priority use confiscated assets: (a) to fully cover the cost of reinstatement of the environment, compensate victims and/or finance measures aimed at combating similar crimes; (b) to fully cover the costs associated with the appropriate management, housing and care of confiscated live animals in an appropriate interim facility; Confiscated wildlife products shall be offered to appropriate public entities for genuine educational and conservation purposes or shall be destroyed.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 549 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Animal shelters, sanctuaries, rescue centres and any other appropriate interim facilities shall be equipped to accommodate and address the specific needs of confiscated specimens of wild fauna species subject to the offences (l),(m) of Article 3, to assist in the recovery and provide adequate and appropriate living conditions with a view on a release, when possible.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 550 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide for a limitation period that enables the investigation, prosecution, trial and judicial adjudication of criminal offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 for a sufficient period of time after the commission of those criminal offences, in order for those criminal offences to be tackled effectively. For the crimes comparable to or qualifying as an offence of ecocide and crimes affecting an ecosystem that is established as a legal entity there shall be no limitation period.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 619 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that national authorities which execute inspections, detect, investigate, prosecute or adjudicate environmental offences have a sufficient number of qualified staff and sufficient financial, technical and technological resources necessary for the effective performance of their functions related to the implementation of this Directive.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 621 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall designate, train and provide resources for specific staff with expertise in environmental crime along the enforcement chain.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 623 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Without prejudice to the first paragraph, the Commission shall develop sentencing guidelines in order to assist the Member States and their authorities in proper and harmonised implementation of the Directive.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 626 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that effective investigative tools, such as those which are used in organised crime, financial crime, cybercrime or other serious crime cases, are also available for investigating or prosecuting offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 633 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19 a Cooperation between the Member States and the Commission (OLAF) and other Union bodies Without prejudice to the rules on cross- border cooperation and mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, the Member States, Eurojust, the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the Commission shall, within their respective competences, cooperate with each other in the fight against the criminal offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4. To that end the Commission, and where appropriate, Eurojust, shall provide such technical and operational assistance as the competent national authorities need to facilitate coordination of their investigations. The EPPO shall be responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences. In that respect the EPPO shall undertake investigations, and carry out acts of prosecution and exercise the functions of prosecutor in the competent courts of the Member States.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 638 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the modes of coordination, exchange of best practices and cooperation between the competent authorities and between the competent national authorities and the competent national authorities of other Member States, including on the management of the confiscated gains;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 645 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the number of environmental crime cases investigated, and separately for those involving cross-border cooperation;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 647 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the number of dismissed court cases for environmental crime, and separately dismissals upon the expiry of the limitation period;
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 672 #

2021/0422(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 a (new)
Article 27 a Amendments to Directive 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law The title is amended as follows: Directive 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests and cross-border protection of the environment by means of criminal law Into Article 18 a new paragraph is inserted: By December 2024 the Commission shall present a legislative proposal on inclusion of environmental crimes to the criminal offences covered by this Directive and on the creation of the office of the Green European Public Prosecutor.
2022/06/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 852 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i
(i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the train paths for freight trains, and not less than two train paths per hour and direction, can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m;
2022/11/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 856 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii
(ii) on single track lines, at least one train path per two hours and direction can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m;deleted
2022/11/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 861 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) provides a standard of at least P400Facilitates the operation of trains carrying P400 semi-trailers on pocket wagons in accordance with item 1.1.1.1.3.5 of Table 1 in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/77757 , without any additional requirement for special permission to operate services. __________________ 57 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/777 of 16 May 2019 on the common specifications for the register of railway infrastructure and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/880/EU (OJ L 139I, 27.5.2019, p. 312).
2022/11/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 948 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) class B systems are decommissioned., unless designed to perform in a mass transit system in urban nodes;
2022/11/17
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1248 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the airports of the core network are connected withto the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport networkTEN-T network and to corresponding urban nodes, as set out in Annex II, by a fast, high-frequency, carbon-free connection via rail, metro, light rail or trams by 31 December 2030, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connections;
2022/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1255 #

2021/0420(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected withto the long- distance railway network, including with the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans- European transport networkTEN-T network and to corresponding urban nodes, as set out in Annex II, by a fast, high-frequency, carbon-free connection via rail, metro, light rail or trams by 31 December 2050, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connections;
2022/11/21
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 22 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) In order to enhance cooperation with long-standing members sharing EU values, contributions from member parties having their seat in a country outside the Union but in the Council of Europe, should be allowed. However, such contributions should be subject to a cap in relation to total contribution, to limit the risk of foreign interference. The above contributions should be subject to monitoring and control of the purpose of these donations and proving an absence of politically motivated interference, including indirect interference, of non- democratic third countries.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 25 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
(40a) To guarantee an efficient use of funds, a European political party should be allowed during the European Parliament election campaign to use its logo and name simultaneously to the logo and name of the corresponding group in the European Parliament according to what the European political party decides. The costs that arise should be possible to be financed by the European political party during the European Parliament election campaign.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 27 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) European political parties should not fund, directly or indirectly, other political parties and, in particular, national parties or candidates. European political foundations should not fund, directly or indirectly, European or national politicand foundations should not use the funding received from the general budget of the Union for the sole benefit , directly or indirectly, of other political parties and, in particular, national, parties or candidates. The prohibition of indirect funding should however not prevent European political parties or political foundations from publicly supporting and engaging with their member parties or member organisations in the Union on issues of relevance for the Union, or tofrom supporting political activities in the common interest, or from engaging in educational activities, in order to be able to fulfil their mission under Article 10(4) TEU and act to reinforce the existence of the European demos. The prohibition of indirect funding should not prevent the participation of either representatives and staffers of political parties, nor of potentially politically active persons in events of European political foundations. Moreover, European political parties and their affiliated European political foundations should only finance activities in the context of national referendum campaigns when they concern the implementation of the TEU and the TFEU issues directly related to the Union. These principles reflect Declaration No 11 on Article 191 of the Treaty establishing the European Community annexed to the Final Act of the Treaty of Nice.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) It is necessary to establish a common repository for the disclosures of European political parties. Given its specific role in the implementation of this Regulation, the Authority should establish and manage such repository as a part of the Registry for European political parties. The information contained in the repository should be transmitted by European Political Parties to the Authority using a standard format and may be automated. European political parties should make available in the Authority’s repository information to enable the wider context and objectives of the political advertisement and its aims to be understood. The information on the amount allocated to political advertising in the context of a specific campaign to be included in the repository may be based on an estimated allocation of funding. The amounts to be mentioned in the repository realistic estimation of funding and the actual amounts, once known. The amounts to be mentioned in the repository regarding information on political advertising, include donations for specific purposes or, benefits in kind, contributions and their own resources.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 41 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘indirect funding’ means funding from which the member party derives a financial advantage, even where no funds are directly transferred; this should include cases which allow the member party to avoid expenditure which it would otherwise have had to incur for activities, other than political activities in the common interest, organised for its own and sole benefit; this shall also include trainings and seminars for individual members which in case of being elected or appointed to a public position do not have to partially or fully compensate retrospectively for the training received previously; this shall also apply to individual members who after having been elected or appointed to a public position do not have the obligation in front of their member party to pay a regular salary share related to their election or appointment, as well as any membership tax or any other way that might come as a compensation for the individual member's election or nomination in a public function on behalf of the party;
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 52 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. For all donations the value of whichnon-recurring donations exceeding EUR 3000 and all recurring donations during a timeframe of 12 consecutive months exceedsing EUR 3000, European political parties and European political foundations shall request donors to provide the necessary information for their proper identification. European political parties and European political foundations shall transmit the information received to the Authority upon its requestThis identification shall give information about the personal and business environment of the donor in order to avoid the absence of control over donations executed by members belonging to the same personal or professional sphere, such as donations coming from the same family or the same work organisation.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 67 #

2021/0375(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The funding of European political foundations from the general budget of the European Union or from any other source shall not be used for any other purpose than for financing their tasks as listed in Article 2, point (4), and to meet expenditure directly linked to the objectives set out in their statutes in accordance with Article 6. It shall in particular not be used for the direct or indirect funding of elections, political parties, or candidates or other foundations, other than political activities in the common interest of European and national parties and capacity building to support the formation of future political leadership in the Union.
2022/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. Whereas the Union transport and tourism sector iss are essential for Union’s economic, social and environmental development and its sustainability and for ensuring the territorial accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, with particular attention for peripheral, rural, mountainous, insular and outermost regions and other disadvantaged areas;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 6 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Whereas transport and tourism will be key to achieving climate neutrality by 2050; whereas sufficient investment is needed to accelerate the shift to sustainable and smart mobility in line with the Green Deal;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 9 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. Whereas tourism is an essential sector for the EU economy, as its fourth largest export industry, and plays an important role in fostering its competitiveness, employment and social well-being; whereas Europe’s tourism sector has been severely hit by the COVID crisis, registering an investment gap of EUR 161 billion in 2020, with drastic impacts across the entire system, notably for the 27 million of workers employed directly and indirectly in the tourism sector;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 11 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Union budget must be equipped with the tools to enable it to respond to multiple crises simultaneously; reiterates Parliament’s view that the 2022 budget should play a pivotal role in ensuring a positive and tangible impact on citizens’ lives; against this background, supports increases to boost investment with a particular focus on SMEs, strengthen efforts towards the green and digital transitions, give fresh opportunities to young people in particular, build a strong European Health Union; reinforces, further, priorities in the fields of security, migration, fundamental rights, while acknowledging the recent deteriorating situation in external policy and humanitarian aid and the need to be able to react swiftly to the upcoming challenges; emphasises the leading role that the European Union must play in ending the pandemic by financing vaccination through COVAX in the low income countries;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
D a. Whereas the EU’s Vision Zero objective sets the goal to reduce road deaths by 50% until 2030 and achieve zero fatalities by 2050; whereas investments in road safety are a key element of the EU’s Strategic Action Plan on Road Safety; whereas the persistent high road fatality numbers suggest that more investment should be provided to guarantee road and user safety;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 15 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that appropriate funding for transport projects will be instrumental in boosting EU recovery and advancing towards the green and digital transition; calls on the Commission and Member States to use the available financial tools - including, but not limited to CEF, RRF, Cohesion Fund, InvestEU, ERDF - in an articulate and complementary way to maximise their effect on recovery while ensuring adequate long-term funding of EU transport projects, including the projects aiming at the reduction of transport- related environmental impact, such as air pollution monitoring;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 18 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Highlights the need to use EU financing for information materials and training of transport workers, particularly truck drivers, in order to enable them to react to safety threats;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 20 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Calls on the Commission to dedicate additional resources to the fight of cargo theft, the theft of vehicles and other criminal activities putting in danger the lives of transport workers;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 24 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. [02 03 01] Reiterates the crucial role of CEF in fostering the development and timely completion of a high performance trans-European network (TEN-T) that is sustainable and interconnected across the areas of transport, energy and digital services infrastructure; regrets in that regard the proposed reduction of the CEF-transport budget in 2022 compared to 2021 and to the levels observed in the previous Multiannual Financial Framework; underlines the need for the increased use of CEF for providing resources for safe and secure parking areas in the EU; requests the Commission to allocate additional resources for the certification and safety control in parking lots;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 28 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the role of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and related national plans in stimulating the recovery in the transport and tourism sectors; insists on the need for proper parliamentary scrutiny of its implementation; in full cooperation with regional and local authorities and all related stakeholders;
2021/07/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 77 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that youth remains an overarching priority for the Union budget; reinforces therefore funding to meet increasing demand for the Erasmus+ programme by a total amount of just over EUR 137 million, as a 5% increase represents an additional 40,000 mobility exchanges; calls the Commission to present a draft amending budget so that the unspent funds from the 2021 budget should be carried over into the 2022 budget in order to help students regaining the missed opportunities due to the pandemic, so that we do not have a lost generation for Erasmus; furthermore increases the European Solidarity Corps by EUR 5 million as the economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic should not adversely affect support for the youth;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 91 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Regrets that the increase for EPPO budget in 2021 voted by both arms of budgetary authority is not respected the Commission; reiterates the fundamental role that EPPO plays in protecting the financial interests of the Union, including the use of funds from Next Generation EU, as well as ensuring the respect of the rule of law; invites the Commission to clarify the blockade of the 7.3 million euro and to ensure that the budget for 2021 and 2022 of EPPO will be fully respected and implemented;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 112 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Strongly objects to Council’s cuts to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) as the agency must be adequately equipped and its staff upgraded to enable it to deliver in all areas of responsibility falling under its new mandate; decides, however, to place EUR 90 000 000 into the reserve subject to the recruitment of the remaining 20 fundamental rights monitors at AD grade, the recruitment of the three deputy executive directors and the adoption of a procedure for the implementation of Article 46 of Regulation 2019/18969 ; _________________ 9Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1).
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 119 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39 a. Highlights the need to ensure appropriate staff level to Europol as of the beginning of 2022, in line with relevant Commission proposal; Stresses that in the absence of the adoption of Europol’s revised legal basis by the end of 2021, the reserve retained on the agency's budget may lead to delayed recruitment of staff allocated to the Agency in 2022 which is required to ensure the preparation for an efficient implementation of Europol’s revised legal basis and mandate.
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 135 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
44. StressDeplores the ineed to support developing countries in improvquality of vaccination coverage ing their health systems and world; therefore stresses the need to enable accessing to COVID-19 vaccines in developing countries, particularly through the COVAX initiative, as well as supporting the improvement of their health systems; decides, therefore, to earmark the amount of EUR 1 billion under the emerging challenges and priorities cushion of NDICI-Global Europe in 2022 to this effect, including the NDICI carry- over funds from year 2021, as well as a further EUR 100 million under the line “People - Global Challenges” in addition to the pledges already made by the Commission in 2021, including the extra 200 million doses announced at the State of the Union; requests that Member States fulfil with urgency the COVAX pledges already made and invites them to commit additional EUR 2 billion, either to COVAX or in vaccine doses, in the first semester of 2022;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 152 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
49. Stresses that, given the new legislative proposals, such as and strategic initiatives arising from the European Green Deal, such as the Biodiversity Strategy to 2030, Chemical Strategy for Sustainability, Fit for 55 package, and increased Union spending due to NGEU and the Recovery and Resilience Facility, some services, in particular the Commission’s Directorate-General for Environment and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), will need staff reinforcements; asks the Commission as honest broker to reassess these needs promptly and to propose thesadequate reinforcements in its Amending letterduring the Conciliation, without undermining the actual human resources level in its other services or agencies;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 168 #

2021/0227(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53 – point i
i) rRecalls the support of the vast majority of Parliament’s Members for a single seat to ensure that Union taxpayers’ money is spent efficiently and for Parliament to assume its institutional responsibility to reduce its carbon footprintneed to find solutions to optimise parliamentary institutional work, financial costs and the carbon footprint with due regard for geographical distribution of European Parliament’s three seats; recalls that according to the Treaty on the European Union, the European Parliament is to have its seat in Strasbourg; notes that permanent changes would require a Treaty change for which unanimity is needed;
2021/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 357 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 29a – paragraph 3
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 35 to supplement this Directive by specifying the methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from renewable fuels of non-biological origin and from recycled carbon fuels. The delegated act based on this article shall be published by December 31, 2022. The methodology shall ensure that credit for avoided emissions is not given for CO2 the capture of which has already received an emission credit under other provisions of law.;
2022/03/22
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2021/0115(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Regrets the lengthy process in such difficult circumstances and calls the Commission to accelerate the process of assessment, ensuring that the dismissed workers can benefit from the Union's support in a timely manner;
2021/05/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2021/0115(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that the Netherlands has decided not to offer income support to the dismissed workers through the EGF; takes note that the Dutch government had launched a generic wage support grant for all companies whose turnover is affected by more than 20 % by the COVID-19 crisis and that KLM Group applied for NOW-grant (Noodmaatregel Overbrugging voorWerkgelegenheid); takes note that KLM Group applied for the entire period covered by the NOW grant and has already received advance payments of EUR 683 million and should receive an additional EUR 488 million;
2021/05/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2021/0115(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Notes that it is for the Member State to decide how many of the eligible workers should be targeted to benefit of the support, therefore calls on the Netherlands to focus on the most vulnerable groups that are likely to face most difficulties on the job market;
2021/05/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 375 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The notion of remote biometric identification system as used in this Regulation should be defined functionally, as an AI system intended for the identification of natural persons at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database, and without prior knowledge whether the targeted person will be present and can be identified, irrespectively of the particular technology, processes or types of biometric data used. Considering their different characteristics and manners in which they are used, as well as the different risks involved, a distinction should be made between ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification systems. In the case of ‘real-time’ systems, the capturing of the biometric data, the comparison and the identification occur all instantaneously, near-instantaneously or in any event without a significant delay. In this regard, there should be no scope for circumventing the rules of this Regulation on the ‘real- time’ use of the AI systems in question by providing for minor delays. ‘Real-time’ systems involve the use of ‘live’ or ‘near- ‘live’ material, such as video footage, generated by a camera or other device with similar functionality. In the case of ‘post’ systems, in contrast, the biometric data have already been captured and the comparison and identification occur only after a significant delay. This involves material, such as pictures or video footage generated by closed circuit television cameras or private devices, which has been generated before the use of the system in respect of the natural persons concerned. The notion of remote biometric identification system shall not include authentification and verification systems whose purpose is to confirm, based on prior consent, that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be or to confirm the identity of a natural person for the purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 393 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In light of their digital nature, certain AI systems should fall within the scope of this Regulation even when they are neither placed on the market, nor put into service, nor used in the Union. This is the case for example of an operator established in the Union that contracts certain services to an operator established outside the Union in relation to an activity to be performed by an AI system that would qualify as high-risk and whose effects impact natural persons located in the Union. In those circumstances, the AI system used by the operator outside the Union could process data lawfully collected in and transferred from the Union, and provide to the contracting operator in the Union the output of that AI system resulting from that processing, without that AI system being placed on the market, put into service or used in the Union. To prevent the circumvention of this Regulation and to ensure an effective protection of natural persons located in the Union, this Regulation should also apply to providers and users of AI systems that are established in a third country, to the extent the output produced by those systems is used in the Union. Nonetheless, to take into account existing arrangements and special needs for cooperation with foreign partners with whom information and evidence is exchanged, this Regulation should not apply to public authorities of a third country and international organisations when acting in the framework of international agreements concluded at national or European level for law enforcement and judicial cooperation with the Union or with its Member States. Such agreements have been concluded bilaterally between Member States and third countries or between the European Union, Europol and other EU agencies and third countries and international organisations. This exception should nevertheless be limited to trusted countries and international organizations that share the Union’s values.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 428 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The placing on the market, putting into service or use of certain AI systems intended to distort human behaviour, whereby physical or psychological harms are likely to occur, should be forbidden. SuchIn particular, AI systems that deploy subliminal components individualthat natural persons cannot perceive or, that exploit the vulnerabilities of children and people due to their age, physical or mental incapacities. They do soany groups,or that use purposefully manipulative techniques with the intention to materially distort the behaviour of a person and in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harm to that or another person or to their rights or to the values of the Union should be prohibited. The intention may not be presumed if the distortion of human behaviour results from factors external to the AI system which are outside of the control of the provider or the user. Research for legitimate purposes in relation to such AI systems should not be stifled by the prohibition, if such research does not amount to use of the AI system in human- machine relations that exposes natural persons to harm and such research is carried out in accordance with recognised ethical standards for scientific research.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 434 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) AI systems providing social scoring of natural persons for general purpose by public authorities or on their behalf may lead to discriminatory outcomes and the exclusion of certain groups. They may violate the right to dignity and non- discrimination and the values of equality and justice. Such AI systems evaluate or classify the trustworthiness of natural persons based on their social behaviour in multiple contexts or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics using trustworthiness, good citizenship, patriotism, deviancy, or any other such metric as a proxi. The social score obtained from such AI systems may lead to the detrimental or unfavourable treatment of natural persons or whole groups thereof in social contexts, which are unrelated to the context in which the data was originally generated or collected or to a detrimental treatment that is disproportionate or unjustified to the gravity of their social behaviour. This detrimental treatment can also be effected by providing undue and unjustified privileges to groups of people based on their social score. Such AI systems should be therefore prohibited.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 451 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The use of AI systems for ‘real- time’ remote biometric identification of natural persons in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement is considered particularly intrusive in the rights and freedoms of the concerned persons, to the extent that it may affect the private life of a large part of the population, evoke a feeling of constant surveillance and indirectly dissuade the exercise of the freedom of assembly and other fundamental rights. In addition, the immediacy of the impact and the limited opportunities for further checks or corrections in relation to the use of such systems operating in ‘real-time’ carry heightened risks for the rights and freedoms of the persons that are concerned by law enforcement activities. The use of those systems in publicly accessible places should therefore be prohibited.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 467 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The use of those systems for the purpose of law enforcement should therefore be prohibited, except in three exhaustively listed and narrowly defined situations, where the use is strictly necessary to achieve a substantial public interest, the importance of which outweighs the risks. Those situations involve the search for potential victims of crime, including missing children; certain threats to the life or physical safety of natural persons or of a terrorist attack; and the detection, localisation, identification or prosecution of perpetrators or suspects of the criminal offences referred to in Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA38 if those criminal offences are punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined in the law of that Member State. Such threshold for the custodial sentence or detention order in accordance with national law contributes to ensure that the offence should be serious enough to potentially justify the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems. Moreover, of the 32 criminal offences listed in the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, some are in practice likely to be more relevant than others, in that the recourse to ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification will foreseeably be necessary and proportionate to highly varying degrees for the practical pursuit of the detection, localisation, identification or prosecution of a perpetrator or suspect of the different criminal offences listed and having regard to the likely differences in the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm or possible negative consequences. _________________ 38 Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 473 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to ensure that those systems are used in a responsible and proportionate manner, it is also important to establish that, in each of those three exhaustively listed and narrowly defined situations, certain elements should be taken into account, in particular as regards the nature of the situation giving rise to the request and the consequences of the use for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned and the safeguards and conditions provided for with the use. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement should be subject to appropriate limits in time and space, having regard in particular to the evidence or indications regarding the threats, the victims or perpetrator. The reference database of persons should be appropriate for each use case in each of the three situations mentioned above.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 483 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Each use of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement should be subject to an express and specific authorisation by a judicial authority or by an independent administrative authority of a Member State. Such authorisation should in principle be obtained prior to the use, except in duly justified situations of urgency, that is, situations where the need to use the systems in question is such as to make it effectively and objectively impossible to obtain an authorisation before commencing the use. In such situations of urgency, the use should be restricted to the absolute minimum necessary and be subject to appropriate safeguards and conditions, as determined in national law and specified in the context of each individual urgent use case by the law enforcement authority itself. In addition, the law enforcement authority should in such situations seek to obtain an authorisation as soon as possible, whilst providing the reasons for not having been able to request it earlier.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 490 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Furthermore, it is appropriate to provide, within the exhaustive framework set by this Regulation that such use in the territory of a Member State in accordance with this Regulation should only be possible where and in as far as the Member State in question has decided to expressly provide for the possibility to authorise such use in its detailed rules of national law. Consequently, Member States remain free under this Regulation not to provide for such a possibility at all or to only provide for such a possibility in respect of some of the objectives capable of justifying authorised use identified in this Regulation.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 499 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The use of AI systems for ‘real- time’ remote biometric identification of natural persons in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement necessarily involves the processing of biometric data. The rules of this Regulation that prohibit, subject to certain exceptions, such use, which are based on Article 16 TFEU, should apply as lex specialis in respect of the rules on the processing of biometric data contained in Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, thus regulating such use and the processing of biometric data involved in an exhaustive manner. Therefore, such use and processing should only be possible in as far as it is compatible with the framework set by this Regulation, without there being scope, outside that framework, for the competent authorities, where they act for purpose of law enforcement, to use such systems and process such data in connection thereto on the grounds listed in Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. In this context, this Regulation is not intended to provide the legal basis for the processing of personal data under Article 8 of Directive 2016/680. However, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for purposes other than law enforcement, including by competent authorities, should not be covered by the specific framework regarding such use for the purpose of law enforcement set by this Regulation. Such use for purposes other than law enforcement should therefore not be subject to the requirement of an authorisation under this Regulation and the applicable detailed rules of national law that may give effect to it.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 512 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Any processing of biometric data and other personal data involved in the use of AI systems for biometric identification, other than in connection to the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement as regulated by this Regulation, including where those systems are used by competent authorities in publicly accessible spaces for other purposes than law enforcement, should continue to comply with all requirements resulting from Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, as applicable.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 527 #

2021/0106(COD)

(27) High-risk AI systems should only be placed on the Union market or put into service if they comply with certain mandatory requirements. Those requirements should ensure that high-risk AI systems available in the Union or whose output is otherwise used in the Union do not pose unacceptable risks to important Union public interests as recognised and protected by Union law. AI systems identified as high-risk should be limited to those that have a significant harmful impact on the health, safety and fundamental rights of persons in the Union or to Union values as enshrined in Article 2 TEU and such limitation minimises any potential restriction to international trade, if any.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 538 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) As regards stand-alone AI systems, meaning high-risk AI systems other than those that are safety components of products, or which are themselves products, it is appropriate to classify them as high-risk if, in the light of their intended purpose, they pose a high risk of harm to the health and, safety or the fundamental rights of persons or to Union values as enshrined in Article 2 TEU, taking into account both the severity of the possible harm and its probability of occurrence and they are used in a number of specifically pre-defined areas specified in the Regulation. The identification of those systems is based on the same methodology and criteria envisaged also for any future amendments of the list of high-risk AI systems. Such systems should be classified as high-risk only insofar as they are built and operated with biometric, biometrics- based, or personal data or they influence decisions of natural persons or make decisions or influence decisions affecting natural persons. This ensures that, when referencing AI systems in pre-defined areas of human activity, this Regulation does not inadvertently apply to AI systems that can have no impact on the health, safety, fundamental rights of natural persons or the values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 554 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) As regards the management and operation of critical infrastructure, it is appropriate to classify as high-risk the AI systems intended to be used as safety components in the management and operation of road traffic and the supply of water, gas, heating and electricity, and internet, since their failure or malfunctioning may put at risk the life and health of persons at large scale and lead to appreciable disruptions in the ordinary conduct of social and economic activities.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 561 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) AI systems used in employment, workers management and access to self- employment, notably for the recruitment and selection of persons, for making decisions on promotion and termination and for personalised task allocation based on personal or biometric data, monitoring or evaluation of persons in work-related contractual relationships, should also be classified as high-risk, since those systems may appreciably impact future career prospects and livelihoods of these persons. Relevant work-related contractual relationships should involve employees and persons providing services through platforms as referred to in the Commission Work Programme 2021. Such persons should in principle not be considered users within the meaning of this Regulation. Throughout the recruitment process and in the evaluation, promotion, or retention of persons in work-related contractual relationships, such systems may perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example against women, certain age groups, persons with disabilities, or persons of certain racial or ethnic origins or sexual orientation. AI systems used to monitor the performance and behaviour of these persons may also impact their rights to data protection and privacy.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 583 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Actions by law enforcement authorities involving certain uses of AI systems are characterised by a significant degree of power imbalance and may lead to surveillance, arrest or deprivation of a natural person’s liberty as well as other adverse impacts on fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter. In particular, if the AI system is not trained with high quality data, does not meet adequate requirements in terms of its accuracy or robustness, or is not properly designed and tested before being put on the market or otherwise put into service, it may single out people in a discriminatory or otherwise incorrect or unjust manner. Furthermore, the exercise of important procedural fundamental rights, such as the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial as well as the right of defence and the presumption of innocence, could be hampered, in particular, where such AI systems are not sufficiently transparent, explainable and documented. It is therefore appropriate to classify as high-risk a number of AI systems intended to be used in the law enforcement context where accuracy, reliability and transparency is particularly important to avoid adverse impacts, retain public trust and ensure accountability and effective redress. In view of the nature of the activities in question and the risks relating thereto, those high-risk AI systems should include in particular AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities for individual risk assessments, polygraphs and similar tools or to detect the emotional state of natural person, to detect ‘deep fakes’, for the evaluation of the reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings, for predicting the occurrence or reoccurrence of an actual or potential criminal offence based on profiling of natural persons, or assessing personality traits and characteristics or past criminal behaviour of natural persons or groups, for profiling in the course of detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences, as well as for crime analytics regarding natural persons. AI systems specifically intended to be used for administrative proceedings by tax and customs authorities should not be considered high-risk AI systems used by law enforcement authorities for the purposes of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 602 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
(40 a) When the “deep fake” content forms part of an evidently artistic, creative, or fictional cinematographic and analogous work, or when the “AI authors” generate content that undergoes human review and for the publication of which a natural or legal person established in the Union is liable or holds editorial responsibility, the AI systems should not be considered high-risk but should nevertheless be subject to adequate transparency requirements, where appropriate.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 606 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 b (new)
(40 b) Subliminal techniques are techniques that expose natural persons to sensorial stimuli that the natural persons cannot consciously perceive but that are assumed to register in the brain unconsciously, such as flashing images or text for fractions of a second or playing sounds outside the range of perceptible hearing. AI systems deploying such techniques should be prohibited, because these techniques are by their very nature intended to be manipulative. Nevertheless, exceptions are warranted for AI systems using subliminal techniques for research and therapeutical purposes, based on the consent of the natural persons that are being exposed to them. In such limited cases, the AI systems should be considered high-risk and comply with the requirements for high-risk AI systems as set forth in this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 613 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) To mitigate the risks from high-risk AI systems placed or otherwise put into service on the Union market for users and affected persons, certain mandatory requirements should apply, taking into account the intended purpose of the use of the system and according to the risk management system to be established by the provider. These requirements should be objective-driven, fit to purpose, reasonable and effective, without adding undue regulatory burdens or costs on operators.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 663 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) Given the nature of AI systems and the risks to safety and fundamental rights possibly associated with their use, including as regard the need to ensure proper monitoring of the performance of an AI system in a real-life setting, it is appropriate to set specific responsibilities for users. Users should in particular use high-risk AI systems in accordance with the instructions of use and certain other obligations should be provided for with regard to monitoring of the functioning of the AI systems and with regard to record- keeping, as appropriate. Given the potential impact and the need for democratic oversight and scrutiny, users of high-risk AI systems that are public authorities or Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies should be required to conduct a fundamental rights impact assessment prior to commencing the use of a high-risk AI system should be required to register the use of any high- risk AI systems in a public database.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 688 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
(65) In order to carry out third-party conformity assessment for AI systems intended to be used for the remote biometric identification of personss when so required, notified bodies should be designated under this Regulation by the national competent authorities, provided they are compliant with a set of requirements, notably on independence, competence and absence of conflicts of interests.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 698 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) Under certain conditions, rapid availability of innovative technologies may be crucial for health and safety of persons and for society as a whole. It is thus appropriate that under exceptional reasons of public security or protection of life and health of natural persons and the protection of industrial and commercial property, Member States could authorise the placing on the market or putting into service of AI systems which have not undergone a conformity assessment.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 720 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) Artificial intelligence is a rapidly developing family of technologies that requires novel forms of regulatory oversight and a safe space for experimentation, while ensuring responsible innovation and integration of appropriate safeguards and risk mitigation measures. To ensure a legal framework that is innovation-friendly, future-proof and resilient to disruption, national competent authorities from one or more Member States should be encouraged to establish artificial intelligence regulatory sandboxes to facilitate the development and testing of innovative AI systems under strict regulatory oversight before these systems are placed on the market or otherwise put into service. Member States should ensure that the regulatory sandboxes have the adequate financial and human resources for their proper functioning.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 739 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76
(76) In order to facilitate a smooth,ensure an effective and harmonised implementation of this Regulation a European Artificial Intelligence Board should be established. The Board should be responsible for a number of advisory tasks, including issuing opinions, recommendations, advice or guidance on matters related to the implementation of this Regulation, including on technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements established in this Regulation and providing advice to and assisting the Commission on specific questions related to artificial intelligence, to achieve a high level of trustworthiness and of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights and the Union values enshrined in Article 2 TEU across the Union with regards to artificial intelligence systems, to actively support Member States, Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in matters pertaining to this Regulation, to reduce the fragmentation of the internal market, and to increase the uptake of artificial intelligence throughout the Union, an European Union Artificial Intelligence Office should be established. The AI Office should have legal personality, should act in full independence, and should be adequately funded and staffed. Member States should provide the strategic direction and control of the AI Office through the management board of the AI Office, alongside the Commission, the EDPS, and the FRA. An executive director should be responsible for the coordination of the AI Office’s operations and for the implementation of its work programme. Industry,start-ups and SMEs, and civil society should formally participate in the work of the AI Office through an advisory forum that should ensure varied stakeholder representation and should advise the AI Office on matters pertaining to this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 759 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
(81) The development of AI systems other than high-risk AI systems in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation may lead to a larger uptake of trustworthy artificial intelligence in the Union. Providers of non-high-risk AI systems should be encouraged to create codes of conduct intended to foster the voluntary application of the mandatory requirements applicable to high-risk AI systems or risk-appropriate codes of conduct that sufficiently increase trust in the underlying technology that is not high-risk. Providers should also be encouraged to apply on a voluntary basis additional requirements related, for example, to environmental sustainability, accessibility to persons with disability, stakeholders’ participation in the design and development of AI systems, and diversity of the development teams. The Commission may develop initiatives, including of a sectorial nature, to facilitate the lowering of technical barriers hindering cross-border exchange of data for AI development, including on data access infrastructure, semantic and technical interoperability of different types of data.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 773 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 85
(85) In order to ensure that the regulatory framework can be adapted where necessary, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend the techniques and approaches referred to in Annex I to define AI systems, the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex II, the high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III, the provisions regarding technical documentation listed in Annex IV, the content of the EU declaration of conformity in Annex V, the provisions regarding the conformity assessment procedures in Annex VI and VII and the provisions establishing the high-risk AI systems to which the conformity assessment procedure based on assessment of the quality management system and assessment of the technical documentation should apply. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including with industry, civil society, other stakeholders, and at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making58 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 58 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 803 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) rules for the establishment and functioning of the European Union Artificial Intelligence Office;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 805 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) measures in support of innovation, including the setting up of regulatory sandboxes, and measures to reduce the regulatory burden on SMEs and start-ups.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 883 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. This Regulation shall not apply to public authorities in a third country nor to international organisations falling within the scope of this Regulation pursuant to paragraph 1, where those authorities or organisations use AI systems in the framework of international agreements for law enforcement and judicial cooperation with the Union or with one or more Member States. and are subject of a decision of the Commission adopted in accordance with Article 36 of Directive (EU)2016/680 or Article 45 of Regulation 2016/679 (‘adequacy decision’) or are part of an international agreement concluded between the Union and that third country or international organisation pursuant to Article 218 TFEU adducing adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 902 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a Metaverse environments 1. This regulation shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to operators of AI systems operating in virtual environments that can be accessed by natural persons in the Union that fulfil all the following criteria (‘metaverse environments’): (i) they require natural persons to have a uniquely identifiable and permanent representation within the virtual environment that is legally and economically connected to them via an official identity document, a digital identity, a digital wallet, or equivalent; (ii) they are built for social and economic interaction on a large scale; (iii) they allow natural persons to behave and interact virtually in manners that are consistent with their real-world behaviours and interactions and that can be analysed to infer real-world characteristics, including personal data; (iv) they allow natural persons to engage in real-world financial transactions, including through blockchain-backed digital currencies and non-fungible tokens; (v) they allow for such interactions between natural persons as to make possible risks to the health, safety, or fundamental rights of natural persons or to bring prejudice to the values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1028 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
(33 a) ‘subliminal techniques’ means techniques that use sensorial stimuli such as images, text, or sounds, that are below the limits of conscious human sensorial perception;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1047 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35 a (new)
(35 a) ‘remote biometric categorisation system’ means a biometric categorisation system capable of categorising natural persons at a distance;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1051 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36
(36) ‘remote biometric identification system’ means an AI system for the purpose of identifying natural persons at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database, and without prior knowledge of the user of the AI system whether the person will be present and can be identified , , excluding authentification and verification systems whose sole purpose is to confirm, based on prior consent, that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be or to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1078 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 42
(42) ‘national supervisory authority’ means the authority to which a Member State assigns the responsibility for the implementation and application of this Regulation, for coordinating the activities entrusted to that Member State, for acting as the single contact point for the Commission, and for representing the Member State atin the European Artificial Intelligence Boardmanagement board of the AI Office;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1163 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness in order to materially distort a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or ano, with the exception of AI systems using such techniques for scientific research and for approved therapeutical purposes on the basis of explicit consent of the natural persons that are exposed to them, which systems shall be classified as high risk for ther person physical or psychological harmurposes of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1172 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) The placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys purposefully manipulative or deceptive techniques in order to materially distort a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm, infringe on that person’s or another person’s fundamental rights, or contravene the Union values enshrined in Article 2 TEU;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1185 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons due to their age, physical or mental disability, in order to materially distort the behaviour of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1197 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of AI systems by public authorities or on their behalf for the evaluation or classification of the trustworthiness of natural persons over a certainn extended period of time based on their social behaviour or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics, (social scoring),with the social score leading to either or both of the following:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1208 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) detrimental or unfavourable treatment of certain natural persons or whole groups thereof in social contexts whichthat are unrelated to the contexts in which the data was originally generated or collected;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1220 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
(ii a) privileged treatment of certain natural persons or whole groups thereof in social contexts that are unrelated to the contexts in which the data was originally generated or collected;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1233 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement, unless and in as far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1253 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) the targeted search for specific potential victims of crime, including missing children;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1263 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or of a terrorist attack;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1273 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iii
(iii) the detection, localisation, identification or prosecution of a perpetrator or suspect of a criminal offence referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA62 and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years, as determined by the law of that Member State. _________________ 62 Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1348 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 point d) shall take into account the following elements: (a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm caused in the absence of the use of the system; (b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 point d) shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1357 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm caused in the absence of the use of the system;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1359 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1362 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 point d) shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1364 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. As regards paragraphs 1, point (d) and 2, each individual use for the purpose of law enforcement of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be subject to a prior authorisation granted by a judicial authority or by an independent administrative authority of the Member State in which the use is to take place, issued upon a reasoned request and in accordance with the detailed rules of national law referred to in paragraph 4. However, in a duly justified situation of urgency, the use of the system may be commenced without an authorisation and the authorisation may be requested only during or after the use. The competent judicial or administrative authority shall only grant the authorisation where it is satisfied, based on objective evidence or clear indications presented to it, that the use of the ‘real- time’ remote biometric identification system at issue is necessary for and proportionate to achieving one of the objectives specified in paragraph 1, point (d), as identified in the request. In deciding on the request, the competent judicial or administrative authority shall take into account the elements referred to in paragraph 2.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1376 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The competent judicial or administrative authority shall only grant the authorisation where it is satisfied, based on objective evidence or clear indications presented to it, that the use of the ‘real- time’ remote biometric identification system at issue is necessary for and proportionate to achieving one of the objectives specified in paragraph 1, point (d), as identified in the request. In deciding on the request, the competent judicial or administrative authority shall take into account the elements referred to in paragraph 2.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1381 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. A Member State may decide to provide for the possibility to fully or partially authorise the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement within the limits and under the conditions listed in paragraphs 1, point (d), 2 and 3. That Member State shall lay down in its national law the necessary detailed rules for the request, issuance and exercise of, as well as supervision relating to, the authorisations referred to in paragraph 3. Those rules shall also specify in respect of which of the objectives listed in paragraph 1, point (d), including which of the criminal offences referred to in point (iii) thereof, the competent authorities may be authorised to use those systems for the purpose of law enforcement.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1435 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1, AI systems referred to in Annex III shall also be considered high-risk, with the exception of those AI systems that are not safety components of a product and that fulfil both of the following conditions: (a) they are not developed with and do not use biometric data, biometrics-based data, or personal data as inputs; (b) they are not intended to influence decisions of natural persons or to make decisions or to assist in the making of decisions affecting natural persons.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1558 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. H1. Operators of high-risk AI systems shall comply with the requirements established in this Chapter.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1559 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. In complying with the requirements established in this Chapter, operators of high-risk AI systems shall take into account the generally- acknowledged state of the art, including as reflected in the relevant harmonised standards and common specifications referenced in Articles 40 and 41.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1572 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in relation to high-risk AI systems. The risk management system can be integrated into, or a part of, already existing risk management procedures insofar as it fulfils the requirements of this article.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1584 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) identification and analysis of the known and reasonably foreseeable risks associated with each high-risk AI system with respect to health, safety, fundamental rights, and the values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1614 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The risk management measures referred to in paragraph 2, point (d) shall be such that any relevant residual risk associated with each hazard as well as the overall residual risk of the high-risk AI systems is judged acceptable, provided that the high- risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse. Those residual risks shall be communicated to the user.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1629 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) provision of adequate information pursuant to Article 13, in particular as regards the risks referred to in paragraph 2, point (a) and (b) of this Article, and, where appropriate, training to users.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1659 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 8
8. When implementing the risk management system described in paragraphs 1 to 7, specific consideration shall be given to whether the high-risk AI system is likely to be accessed by or have an impact on children or natural persons suffering from disabilities that render them legally unable to give their consent.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1706 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the identification of relevanyt possible data gaps or shortcomings, and how those gaps and shortcomings can be addressed.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1754 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The technical documentation shall be drawn up in such a way to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements set out in this Chapter and provide national competent authorities and notified bodies with all the necessary information to assess the compliance of the AI system with those requirements. It shall contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex IV or equivalent documentation meeting the same objectives, subject to the approval of the competent authority.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1759 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Where a high-risk AI system related to a product, to which the legal acts listed in Annex II, section A apply, is placed on the market or put into service one single technical documentation shall be drawn up containing all the information set out in Annex IVparagraph 1 as well as the information required under those legal acts.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1967 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – title
Cooperation with competent authorities, the AI Office and the Commission
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1970 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Providers of high-risk AI systems and where applicable, users shall, upon request by a national competent authority, provide that authority or where applicable, by the AI Office or the Commission, provide them with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the high- risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, in an official Union language determined by the Member State concerned. Upon a reasoned request from a national competent authority, providers shall also give that authority access to the logs automatically generated by the high- risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under their control by virtue of a contractual arrangement with the user or otherwise by law.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1974 #

2021/0106(COD)

Upon a reasoned request by a national competent authority or, where applicable, by the Commission, providers and, where applicable, users shall also give the requesting national competent authority or the Commission, as applicable, access to the logs automatically generated by the high-risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under their control by virtue of a contractual arrangement with the user or otherwise by law. The national competent authorities or, where applicable, the Commission, shall keep confidential all trade secrets contained in the information received, in accordance with Article 70(2).
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2012 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Where a distributor considers or has reason to consider that a high-risk AI system is not in conformity with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, it shall not make the high-risk AI system available on the market until that system has been brought into conformity with those requirements. Furthermore, where the system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 65(1), the distributor shall inform the market surveillance authority and the provider or the importer of the system, as applicable, to that effect.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2019 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Upon a reasoned request from a national competent authority, distributors of high-risk AI systems shall provide that authority with all the information and documentation in its possession or available to it, in accordance with the obligations of distributors as outlined by this Regulation, that are necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a high-risk system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title. Distributors shall also cooperate with that national competent authority on any action taken by that authority.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2033 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Providers that initially placed the high-risk AI system on the market or put it into service shall cooperate closely with distributors, importers, users, or other third-parties to supply them with the necessary information or documentation in their possession that is required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular at the moment when such distributors, importers, users or other third-parties become the new providers as determined in paragraph 1 and the initial providers are no longer considered a provider for the purposes of this Regulation as determined in paragraph 2.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2040 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Users of high-risk AI systems shall use such systems and implement human oversight in accordance with the instructions of use accompanying the systems, pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 5.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2050 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, to the extent the user exercises control over the input data, that user shall ensure that input data is relevant in view of the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system. To the extent the user exercises control over the high-risk AI system, that user shall also ensure that relevant and appropriate robustness and cybersecurity measures are in place and are regularly adjusted or updated.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2062 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Users of high-risk AI systems that are public authorities or Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct a fundamental rights impact assessment prior to commencing the use of a high-risk AI system;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2125 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall issue standardisation requests covering all essential requirements of this Regulation in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation 1025/2012 no later than 6 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2131 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. Where harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 do not exist or where the Commission considers that the relevant harmonised standards are insufficient or that there is a need to address specific safety or fundamental right concerns, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt common specifications in respect of the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Titleshall issue a standardisation request to one or several of the European standardization organizations in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation 1025/2012 and may, by means of implementing acts, adopt common specifications in respect of the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, which shall only be valid until the requested harmonised standards have been elaborated and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 74(2).
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2139 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, when preparing the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, shall gather the views of relevant stakeholders, including industry, start-ups, and SMEs, and of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectorial Union law.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2293 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. AI regulatory sandboxes 1. established by one or more Member States competent authorities or the European Data Protection Supervisor shall provide a controlled environment that facilitates the development, testing and validation of innovative AI systems for a limited time beMember States shall establish AI regulatory sandboxes, which shall be operational by [24 months following the entering into force of this Regulation], and shall ensure that the competent authorities responsible fore their placement on the market or putting into service pursuant to a specific plan. Thi regulatory sandboxes shall take place under the direct supervision and guidance by the competent authorities with a view to ensuring compliance with the requirements of this Regulation and, where relevant, other Union and Member States legislation supervised within the sandboxve sufficient resources available to fulfil their duties effectively and in a timely manner. Regulatory sandboxes can also be established at local, regional or European level.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2298 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. AI regulatory sandboxes established by one or more Member States, by local, regional, or national competent authorities, by the Commission or by the European Data Protection Supervisor shall provide a controlled environment that facilitates the development, testing and validation of innovative AI systems for a limited time before their placement on the market or putting into service pursuant to a specific plan. This shall take place under the direct supervision and guidance by the competent authorities with a view to ensuring compliance with the requirements of this Regulation and, where relevant, other Union and Member States legislation supervised within the sandbox.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2330 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 5
5. Member States’National competent authorities that have established AI regulatory sandboxes shall coordinate their activities and cooperate within the framework of the European Artificial Intelligence BoardAI Office. They shall submit annual reports to the BoardAI Office and the Commission on the results ofrom the implementation of those scheme, including good practices, incidents, lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the application of this Regulation and other Union legislation supervised within the sandbox. Those reports or abstracts thereof shall be made available to the public in order to further enable innovation in the Union.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2333 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Regulatory sandboxes shall allow and facilitate the testing of possible adaptations of the regulatory framework governing artificial intelligence in order to enhance innovation or reduce compliance costs, without prejudice to the provisions of this Regulation or to the health, safety, fundamental rights of natural persons or to the values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU. The results and lessons learned from such tests shall be submitted to the AI Office and the Commission.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2334 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6
6. The modalities and the conditions of the operation of the AI regulatory sandboxes, including the eligibility criteria and the procedure for the application, selection, participation and exiting from the sandbox, and the rights and obligations of the participants shall be set out in implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 74(2). no later than 12 months following the entry into force of this Regulation and shall ensure, inter alia: (a) that they allow start-ups to use their participation in the sandbox in order to fulfil, in a guided environment with significantly reduced costs, the conformity assessment obligations of this Regulation or the voluntary application of the codes of conduct referred to in Article 69; (b) that adequate resources are dedicated to the establishment and functioning of the regulatory sandboxes so that the regulatory sandboxes can ensure broad access and keep up with demand for participation without creating disincentivising backlogs or delays; (c)that procedures, processes, and bureaucratic requirements for application, selection, participation, and exiting the sandbox are simple, easily intelligible, clearly communicated, and streamlined so as to facilitate the participation of startups with limited legal and bureaucratic capacities; (d) that procedures, processes, and bureaucratic requirements for application, selection, participation, and exiting the sandbox are streamlined across the Union and that participation in a regulatory sandbox established by a Member State by virtue of its obligation in paragraph 1 or by the Commission is uniformly recognised and carries the same legal effects across the Union.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2341 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The Commission shall draw up guidelines for the proper establishment, development, implementation, functioning, and supervision of regulatory sandboxes.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2347 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In the AI regulatory sandbox personal data lawfully collected for other purposes shall be processed for the purposes of developing and testing certain innovative AI systems in the sandbox underwhen all of the following conditions are met:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2352 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security, under the control and responsibility of the competent authorities. The processing shall be based on Member State or Union law;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2365 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) a short summary of the AI project developed in the sandbox, its objectives, hypotheses and expected results, and non- confidential testing results, is published on the website of the competent authorities.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2392 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title VI – Chapter 1 – title
1 European Artificial Intelligence BoardOffice
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2394 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – title
Establishment of the European Artificial Intelligence BoardOffice
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2397 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1
1. A ‘European Artificial Intelligence Board’ (the ‘Board’) is establishdeleted.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2404 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2
2. The Board shall provide advice and assistance to the Commission in order to: (a) contribute to the effective cooperation of the national supervisory authorities and the Commission with regard to matters covered by this Regulation; (b) coordinate and contribute to guidance and analysis by the Commission and the national supervisory authorities and other competent authorities on emerging issues across the internal market with regard to matters covered by this Regulation; (c) assist the national supervisory authorities and the Commission in ensuring the consistent application of this Regulation.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2421 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 a (new)
Article 56 a SECTION 1:General provisions An independent ‘European Artificial Intelligence Office’ (the ‘AI Office’) is hereby established. The European Union Artificial Intelligence Office shall bean Office of the Union, shall have legal personality, and shall be adequately funded and staffed. The Office shall enjoy in all the Member States the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under their laws. Or.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2422 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 b (new)
Article 56 b Mandate 1. The AI Office shall carry out the tasks assigned to it under this Regulation for the purpose of achieving a high level of trustworthiness and of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights and the Union values enshrined in Article 2 TEU across the Union with regards to artificial intelligence systems, including by actively supporting Member States, Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in matters pertaining to this Regulation. The AI Office shall act as a reference point for advice and expertise on artificial intelligence for Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, for Member States and their national supervisory authorities, as well as for other relevant Union stakeholders. 2. The AI Office shall contribute to reducing the fragmentation of the internal market and to increasing the uptake of artificial intelligence throughout the Union by carrying out the tasks assigned to it under this Regulation. 3. When carrying out its tasks, the AI Office shall act independently while avoiding the duplication of Member State activities and taking into consideration Member State competences. 4. The AI Office shall organise consultations with stakeholders twice a year to assess the evolution of trends in technology, issues related to the implementation and the effectiveness of this Regulation, regulatory gaps or loopholes observed in practice. Such stakeholders shall include representatives from industry, start-ups and SMEs, civil society organisations, such as NGOs, consumer associations, the social partners and academia. 5. The AI Office may consult national authorities, such as national equality bodies, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them. The AI Office may also consult, where appropriate, external experts and observers and interested third parties, including stakeholders such as those referred to in paragraph 5, and may hold exchanges with them. 6. The AI Office shall cooperate with Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups and shall make the results of that cooperation publicly available.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2423 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 c (new)
Article 56 c Accountability, transparency, and independence 1. The AI Office shall be accountable to the European Parliament and to the Council in accordance with this Regulation. 2. The AI Office shall develop good administrative practices in order to ensure the highest possible level of transparency concerning its activities. Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 shall apply to documents held by the AI Office. 3. The AI Office shall fulfil its tasks in complete independence.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2424 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 d (new)
Article 56 d Administrative and management structure 1. The administrative and management structure of the AI Office shall comprise: (a) a management board (b) an executive director (c) an advisory forum (d) where appropriate, other advisory bodies established by the management board to support the AI Office in technical or scientific matters related to this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2425 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 e (new)
Article 56 e Objectives 1. The AI Office shall: (a) contribute to the uptake of artificial intelligence in the Union, including through supporting innovation and the development of regulatory sandboxes provided for in this Regulation; (b) contribute to a high level of trustworthiness and of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights and the Union values enshrined in Article 2 TEU with regard to artificial intelligence systems in the Union; (c) contribute to the effective cooperation of the national supervisory authorities and the Commission with regard to matters covered by this Regulation; (d) provide forecasts, guidance, and analysis to the Commission, Member States, and to the national supervisory authorities and other competent authorities on emerging issues across the internal market with regard to matters covered by this Regulation and related issues; (e) contribute to the effective and consistent application of this Regulation and assist Member States, the national supervisory authorities, and the Commission in this regard; (f) contribute to the effective cooperation with the competent authorities of third countries and with international organisations; (g) contribute to the development, promotion, and adoption of harmonized standards, common specifications, common benchmarking standards, and voluntary codes of conduct; (h) contribute to the effective and consistent enforcement of this Regulation throughout the Union, including by issuing binding decisions with regard to cases involving two or more Member States asset out in Article 59b.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2427 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57
Structure of the Board 1. The Board shall be composed of the national supervisory authorities, who shall be represented by the head or equivalent high-level official of that authority, and the European Data Protection Supervisor. Other national authorities may be invited to the meetings, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them. 2. The Board shall adopt its rules of procedure by a simple majority of its members, following the consent of the Commission. The rules of procedure shall also contain the operational aspects related to the execution of the Board’s tasks as listed in Article 58. The Board may establish sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific questions. 3. The Board shall be chaired by the Commission. The Commission shall convene the meetings and prepare the agenda in accordance with the tasks of the Board pursuant to this Regulation and with its rules of procedure. The Commission shall provide administrative and analytical support for the activities of the Board pursuant to this Regulation. 4. The Board may invite external experts and observers to attend its meetings and may hold exchanges with interested third parties to inform its activities to an appropriate extent. To that end the Commission may facilitate exchanges between the Board and other Union bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups.Article 57 deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2471 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 a (new)
Article 57 a Composition of the management board 1. The management board shall be composed of one representative of each Member State, the Commission, and the European Data Protection Supervisor, and the Fundamental Rights Agency. Each Member State and the Commission shall have one vote. The EDPS and the FRA shall not have voting rights. 2. Each member of the management board shall have an alternate. That alternate shall represent the member in the member’s absence. 3. The Commission and the Member States shall aim to achieve gender balance on the management board. 4. The list of the members and alternate members of the management board shall be made public and shall be updated by the AI Office on its web site. 5. The term of office of the members of the management board and their alternates shall be four years. That term shall be renewable once.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2472 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 b (new)
Article 57 b Functions of the management board 1. The management board shall be responsible for taking the strategic decisions of the AI Office in accordance with this Regulation. In particular, the management board shall: (a) Establish the general direction of the operation of the AI Office and ensure that the AI Office operates in accordance with the rules and principles laid down in this Regulation; (b) Adopt, on the basis of the draft submitted by the Office's executive director and after the Commission has delivered an opinion, the single programming document of the AI Office containing, inter alia, the AI Office’s multiannual programming and its work programme for the following year. The single programming document shall be transmitted to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; (c) Appoint the executive director and, where relevant, extend his or her term of office or remove him or her from office; (d) Produce, on the basis of a draft drawn up by the executive director, the estimate budget of the AI Office for the following financial year. This estimate, which shall initially include a draft establishment plan by the date of entry into force of this Regulation, shall be transmitted by the management board to the Commission within the first quarter of each year; (e)Adopt the AI Office’s annual draft and final budgets; (f) Assess and adopt the consolidated annual report on the AI Office activities, including an evaluation based on performance indicators; submit both the annual report and the assessment thereof to the European Parliament, to the Council, to the Commission and to the Court of Auditors, and make the annual report public; (g) Adopt the AI Office’s rules of procedure on the basis of the draft submitted by the executive director after the Commission has delivered an opinion; (h) Take decisions, based on the executive director’s recommendation, concerning the establishment of the AI Office’s internal structures and, where necessary, the modification of those internal structures, taking into consideration technological developments that may create additional operational needs and having regard to sound budgetary management;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2473 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 c (new)
Article 57 c Meetings of the management board 1. The meetings of the management board shall be convened by the Chair. The Chair shall prepare the agenda of the meetings in accordance with the tasks of the Board pursuant to this Regulation and with its rules of procedure. 2. The meetings of the management board shall be considered to be quorate where at least two-thirds of its members are present. 3. The management board shall hold at least two ordinary meetings a year. It shall also hold extraordinary meetings at the request of the Chair, at the request of the Commission, or at the request of at least one third of its members. 4. The executive director shall take part in the meetings of the management board but shall not have the right to vote. 5. Members of the advisory forum may take part in the meetings of the management board at the invitation of the Chair, but shall not have the right to vote. 6. The members of the management board and their alternates may be assisted at the meetings of the management board by advisers or experts, subject to the rules of procedure of the management board. 7. The AI Office shall provide the secretariat of the management board and support the management Board in its operations.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2474 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 c (new)
Article 57 c Chair of the management board 1. The management board shall elect a Chair and a deputy Chair from among its voting members by simple majority. The term of office of the Chair and of the deputy Chair shall be three years. The terms of the Chair and of the deputy Chair may be renewed once. The Deputy Chair shall replace the Chair ex officio if the Chair is unable to attend to his or her duties.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2475 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 d (new)
Article 57 d Voting rules of the management board 1. The management board shall take its decisions by a majority of its members, unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation. 2. A majority of two-thirds of the members of the management board shall be required for the adoption of the single programming document and of the annual budget and for the appointment, extension of the term of office or removal of the executive director. 3. Each member shall have one vote. In the absence of a member, their alternate shall be entitled to exercise the member’s right to vote. 4. The Chair of the management board shall take part in the voting. 5. The executive director shall not take part in the voting. 6. The management board’s rules of procedure shall establish more detailed voting arrangements, in particular the circumstances in which a member may act on behalf of another member.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2477 #
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2486 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
When providing advice and assistance to the Commission in the context of Article 56(2), the BoardIn fulfilling its objectives, the AI Office shall in particular:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2493 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) issue opinions, recommendations or written contributions on matters related to the implementation of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2494 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(a b) examine, on its own initiative or on request of its management board, any question covering the application of this Regulation and issue guidelines, recommendations and best practices with a view to ensuring the consistent implementation of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2495 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new)
(a c) provide the Commission, in the cases referred to in Article 68a (1)(a) and(1)(b), with all the available information at its disposal, including market studies, impact assessments, and analyses referred to in paragraph (f) of this article, to prepare the decision for triggering the Commission's intervention and opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 68a;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2496 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new)
(a d) assist Member States in developing the organizational and technical expertise required for the implementation of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2497 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contribute to uniform administrative practices in the Member States, including for the functioning of regulatory sandboxes referred to in Article 53by assisting Member States, the Commission, and, where applicable, other authorities in the establishment, development, and functioning of regulatory sandboxes referred to in Article 53, including by providing input and support in drafting the delegated acts referred to in Article 53(6);
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2501 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) Support innovation by coordinating the exchange of information and good practices and by facilitating the cooperation among regulatory sandboxes established according to Article 53 and by making available on its website the information referred to in Article 53 (5).
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2502 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) issue opinions, recommendations or, written contributions, or studies on matters related to the implementation of this Regulation,technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2 and on the use of harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in paArticular les 40and 41;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2505 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) on technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2,deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2506 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) on the use of harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41,deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2507 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) on the preparation of guidance documents, including the guidelines concerning the setting of administrative fines referred to in Article 71.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2516 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) support the Commission and the Member States in the preparation of guidance documents, including the guidelines concerning the setting of administrative fines referred to in Article 71;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2519 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(c b) encourage, facilitate and support the drawing up of risk-commensurate codes of conduct intended to foster the voluntary application to AI systems of those codes of conduct in close cooperation with industry and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with Article 69;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2523 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new)
(c c) carry out periodic in-depth horizon-scanning, foresight, and market monitoring exercises to analyse trends and emerging issues in respect of this Regulation, with a particular focus on emerging technologies and their interaction with artificial intelligence, European global competitiveness in artificial intelligence, the uptake of artificial intelligence technologies, the development of digital skills, and emerging systemic threats related to artificial intelligence, including those referred to in Article 68a (1)(a) and (1)(b);
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2528 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c d (new)
(c d) cooperate with the European Data Protection Board and with the FRA to provide guidance in relation to the respect of fundamental rights, in particular the right to non-discrimination and to equal treatment, the right to privacy and the protection of personal data;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2534 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c e (new)
(c e) promote public awareness and understanding of the benefits, risks, rules and safeguards and rights in relation to the use of AI systems;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2538 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c f (new)
(c f) promote the cooperation and effective bilateral and multilateral exchange of information and best practices between the national supervisory authorities;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2540 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c g (new)
(c g) facilitate cooperation between the supervisory authorities of Member States and other supervisory authorities that might be responsible for the enforcement of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2543 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c h (new)
(c h) support capacity and expertise building in supervisory authorities that are responsible for the enforcement of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2544 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c i (new)
(c i) advise the Commission on the possible amendment of the Annexes by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 73, in particular the annex listing high-risk AI systems;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2545 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c j (new)
(c j) ensure that the national supervisory authorities actively cooperate in the implementation of this Regulation;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2546 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c k (new)
(c k) adopt binding decisions for national competent authorities in cases of serious disagreements pursuant to article 59a (5);
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2547 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c l (new)
(c l) promote the development of a common European approach to benchmarking by cooperating with national metrology and benchmarking authorities and by issuing opinions, recommendations, written contributions, or studies with a view to ensure consistent and harmonised European benchmarking standards;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2548 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c m (new)
(c m) provide guidance in relation to children’s rights, applicable law and minimum standards to meet the objectives of this Regulation that pertain to children;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2549 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point c n (new)
(c n) promote and support the accessible development and use of artificial intelligence systems, in accordance with the provisions of Directive (EU) 2019/882;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2552 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 a (new)
Article 58 a SECTION 3:the Executive Director Functions and powers of the executive director 1. The AI Office shall be managed by its executive director, who shall be completely independent in the performance of his or her duties. Without prejudice to the respective competencies of the Union institutions and the management board, the executive director shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or from any other body. 2. The executive director may be called upon at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council to attend a hearing on any matter linked to the AI Office's activities or to report on the carrying out of his or her tasks. This includes reporting on the activities of the AI Office, the implementation of its annual programming, the annual activity report for the previous year, and any other matter related to the activities of the AO Office. The executive director shall also make a statement before the European Parliament, if requested, and shall answer in writing any question put forward by a Member of the European Parliament within 15 calendar days from receipt of such question. The executive director shall report regularly to the appropriate bodies and committees of the European Parliament. 3. Except where specific deadlines are provided for in this Regulation, the executive director shall ensure that reports are transmitted to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission as soon as possible, and in any event within six months of the end of the reporting period, unless the executive director duly justifies a delay in writing. 4. The executive director shall be responsible for the preparation and implementation of the strategic decisions taken by the management board and for the taking of decisions related to the operational activities of the AI Office in accordance with this Regulation. The executive director shall have the following functions and powers: (a) to propose, prepare and implement the strategic decisions and programmes and activities adopted by the management board within the limits set out in this Regulation, its implementing rules and any applicable law; (b) to take all necessary steps, including the adoption of internal administrative instructions and the publication of notices, to ensure the day-to-day administration and functioning of the AI Office in accordance with this Regulation; (c) to prepare each year the draft single programming document pursuant to Article 57a (b) and to submit it to the management board for endorsement before that draft is sent to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission; (d) to draw up a draft statement of estimates of the revenues and expenditure of the AI Office as part of the single programming document pursuant to Article 57a (d) and to implement thebudget of the AI Office; (e) to prepare each year the annual activity report on the Agency's activities and submit it to the management board; (f) to coordinate all staff matters and all matters of day-to-day administration of the AI Office; (g) to prepare appropriate draft implementing rules to give effect to the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations; (h) to protect the values and interests of the Union by drawing up, submitting to the management board for approval, and implementing effective internal anti- fraud, anti-corruption, data protection and equal opportunity strategies, procedures, and safeguards; (i) to establish and implement effective monitoring and evaluation procedures relating to the performance of the AI Office against its objectives and to report annually to the management board on the results of the monitoring; (j) to consult the advisory forum and to facilitate its operations; (k) to develop and maintain contact with industry, standardization bodies, academia, and civil society, including organizations protecting fundamental and digital rights, consumers, workers, children, persons with disabilities, and other vulnerable categories, to ensure regular dialogue with relevant stakeholders; (l) to cooperate and to exchange views and information regularly with Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies regarding artificial intelligence and related domains such as data, digital infrastructure, platform and internet governance, and cybersecurity, tonsure coherence in the development and the implementation of Union policy; (m) to represent the AI Office in international fora for cooperation on Artificial Intelligence; (n) To support the Chair of the management board in preparing and planning the management board meetings; (o) to perform other tasks pursuant to this Regulation. 5. The executive director shall be accountable for his or her activities to the management board. 6. The executive director shall be the legal representative of the AI Office.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2555 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 b (new)
Article 58 b SECTION 4:the Advisory Forum The advisory forum 1. An advisory forum shall be established by the AI Office to advise it in the fulfilment of its tasks by providing stakeholder input in matters pertaining to this Regulation, in particular on: (a) technological developments and trends related to artificial intelligence; (b) potential updates of this Regulation, including prohibited practices, high-risk AI systems, AI systems requiring additional transparency obligations, and novel techniques used for the development of artificial intelligence; (c) best practices to optimise compliance and to reduce compliance costs and regulatory burden; (d) measures in support of innovation, start-ups, and SMEs, including improving participation in regulatory sandboxes; (e) the development, promotion, and uptake of harmonised standards, harmonised benchmarking standards, and common specifications; (f) emerging threats to health, safety, fundamental rights, or the values of the Union as enshrined in Article2 TEU related to artificial intelligence; 2. The advisory forum shall have a balanced composition and represent the views of different stakeholders, with a third of its members representing industry, a third of its members representing start-ups, SMEs, and the innovation environment, and a third of its members representing civil society and academia. 3. Stakeholders established outside the Union shall only participate in the advisory forum if they are established in third countries that are subject to a decision of the Commission adopted in accordance with Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 or Article 45 of Regulation 2016/679(‘adequacy decision’) or that are part of an international agreement concluded between the Union and that third country or international organisation pursuant to Article 218 TFEU adducing adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. 4. Members of the advisory forum shall be appointed by the management board, based on a recommendation from the executive director, following a transparent call for applications and selection procedure. 5. When drawing up the call for applications and the selection procedure, the executive director shall ensure that: (a) the composition criteria stet out in paragraph 2 are met; (b) the representation of industry, start- up, SMEs and the innovation environment is varied and includes stakeholders of different sizes and representing different industries; (c) the representation of civil society is varied and includes, at a minimum, organizations for the protection of democracy, fundamental rights, consumer rights, the rights of persons with disabilities, and children’s rights; (d) the advisory forum is balanced in terms of geographical distribution and gender. 6. The term of office of the members of the advisory forum shall be two years. To ensure diversity and balanced representation, the term of office for members of the advisory forum shall not be renewable consecutively. 7. The advisory forum shall draw up its rules of procedure and elect three co- Chairs from among its members according to there presentation criteria set out in paragraph 2. Their term of office shall be two years, non-renewable. 8. The advisory forum shall hold regular meetings at least four times a year. The advisory forum can invite experts and other stakeholders to its meetings. The executive director can attend, ex officio, the meetings of the advisory forum. 9. In fulfilling its role as set out in paragraph 1, the advisory forum can prepare opinions, recommendations or written contributions and forward these to the attention of the executive director. 10. The advisory forum shall prepare an annual report of its activities. That report shall be made publicly available, including on the AI Office website. 11. The AI Office shall provide secretarial assistance to the advisory forum to ensure its proper functioning.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2581 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall report to the Commission on an annual basis on the status of the financial and human resources of the national competent authorities with an assessment of their adequacy. The Commission shall transmit that information to the BoardAI Office for discussion and possible recommendations.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2597 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 a (new)
Article 59 a Cooperation mechanism between national supervisory authorities in cases involving two or more Member States 1. Each national supervisory authority shall perform its tasks and powers conferred on in accordance with this Regulation on the territory of its own Member State. 2. In the event of a case involving two or more national supervisory authorities, the national supervisory authority of the Member State where the provider or the user of the concerned AI system is established or where the authorised representative is appointed shall be considered to be the lead national supervisory authority. 3. In the cases referred to in paragraph 2,the relevant national supervisory authorities shall cooperate and exchange all relevant information in due time. National supervisory authorities shall cooperate in order to reach a consensus. 4. In the case of a serious disagreement between two or more national supervisory authorities, the national supervisory authorities shall notify the AI Office and communicate without delay all relevant information related to the case to the AI Office. 5. The AI Office shall, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 4, issue a binding decision to the national supervisory authorities.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2688 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2
2. Where necessary to assess the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2, after all other reasonable ways to verify conformity have been exhausted and have proven to be insufficient, and upon a reasoned request, the market surveillance authorities or, where applicable, the Commission, shall be granted access to the source code of the AI system. Such access shall be subject to existing Union law on the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2723 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3
3. Where the market surveillance authority considers that non-compliance is not restricted to its national territory, it shall inform the Commission, the AI Office and the other Member States of the results of the evaluation and of the actions which it has required the operator to take.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2748 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 1
1. Where, having performed an evaluation under Article 65, the market surveillance authority of a Member State finds that although an AI system is in compliance with this Regulation, it presents a risk to the health or safety of persons, or to the compliance with obligations under Union or national law intended to protect fundamental rights or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall require the relevant operator to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the AI system concerned, when placed on the market or put into service, no longer presents that risk, to withdraw the AI system from the market or to recall it within a reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk, as it may prescribe.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2753 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Should the provider or other relevant operators fail to take corrective action as referred to in paragraph 2 and should the AI system continue to present a risk as referred to in paragraph 1, the market surveillance authority may require the relevant operator, as a measure of last resort, to withdraw the AI system from the market or to recall it within a reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2755 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission, the AI Office, and the other Member States. That information shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary for the identification of the AI system concerned, the origin and the supply chain of the AI system, the nature of the risk involved and the nature and duration of the national measures taken.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2790 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission and the BoardAI Office shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct intended to foster the voluntary application to AI systems of requirements related for example to environmental sustainability, accessibility for persons with a disability, stakeholders participation in the design and development of the AI systems and diversity of development teams on the basis of clear objectives and key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2792 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission and the BoardAI Office shall take into account the specific interests and needs of the small-scale providers and start-ups when encouraging and facilitating the drawing up of codes of conduct.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2798 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. NThe Commission, the AI Office, national competent authorities and notified bodies involved in the application of this Regulation shall respect the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities in such a manner as to protect, in particular:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2820 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
1. In compliance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including administrative fines, applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. They shall take into particular account the interests and size of small-scale providers and start- ups and their economic viability.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2831 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The following infringementsNon-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 30 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 6 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2839 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) non-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2842 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2845 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 20 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 4 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2853 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 4
4. The nNon-compliance of the AI system with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Articles 5 and 10, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 210 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 42 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2876 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 7
7. Each Member State shall lay down rules on whether and to what extent administrative fines mayto be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State, with a view to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2895 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The following infringementsNon-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 51.000 000 EUR:;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2901 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) non-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2904 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2906 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 500 000 EUR.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2910 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 3
3. The non-compliance of the AI system with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Articles 5 and 10, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 25300 000 EUR.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2925 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Prior to adopting a delegated act pursuant to Article 4, Article 7(1), Article 11(3), Article 43(5) and (6), and Article48(5) the Commission shall consult the AI Office.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2926 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Delegated acts that lead to the modification or the addition of obligations on operators shall foresee an adequate transition period of no less than 24 months before their entry into force.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2928 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 4
4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to, the Council, and the AI Office.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2942 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 a (new)
Article 82 a Sound regulation In taking into account the requirements of this Regulation pursuant to the Amendments in Articles 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, and 82, the Commission shall conduct an analysis and consult relevant stakeholders to determine potential gaps as well as overlaps between existing sectoral legislation and the provisions of this Regulation in order to avoid duplication, overregulation, and the creation of loopholes.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2946 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation shall not apply toOperators of the AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex IX that have been placed on the market or put into service before [12 months after the date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)], unless the replacement or amendment of those legal acts leads to a significant change in the design or intended purpose of the AI system or AI systems concerned shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements of the present Regulation within 4 years of its entry into force.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2952 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The requirements laid down in this Regulation shall be taken into account, where applicable, in the evaluation of each large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex IX to be undertaken as provided for in those respective acts and whenever those legal acts are replaced or amended.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2957 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to theOperators of high-risk AI systems, other than the ones referred to in paragraph 1, that have been placed on the market or put into service before [date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)], only if, from that date, those systems are subject to significant changes shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements of the present Regulation within 2 years of its entry into force or at the time when such systems are subject to a substantial modification in their design or intended purpose.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2970 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 1
1. TIn consultation with the AI Office, the Commissions shall assess the need for amendment of the list in Annex III once a year following the entry into force of this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2976 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the state of penalties, and notably administrative fines as referred to in Article 71(1), applied by Member States to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2977 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) the state of the development of harmonised standards and common specifications for Artificial Intelligence;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2981 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 4
4. Within [threone years after the date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)] and every fourtwo years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate the impact and effectiveness of codes of conduct to foster the application of the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2 and possibly other additional requirements for AI systems other than high-risk AI systems.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2983 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 5
5. For the purpose of paragraphs 1 to 4 the BoardAI Office, the Member States and national competent authorities shall provide the Commission with information on its request.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2989 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 6
6. In carrying out the evaluations and reviews referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4 the Commission shall take into account the positions and findings of the BoardAI Office, of the European Parliament, of the Council, and of other relevant bodies or sources.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3047 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
1. 1.Biometric identification and categorisation of natural persons:and biometrics-based systems: (a) AI systems intended to be used for the ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification of natural persons; (b) AI systems intended to be used for the remote biometric categorisation of natural persons in publicly-accessible spaces; (c) AI systems intended to be used for emotion recognition in natural persons;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3110 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used forin recruitment or selection of natural persons, notably for advertising vacancies, screening or filtering applications, or evaluating candidates in the course of interviews or tests;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3117 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
(b) AI systems intended to be used for making decisions or to assist in making decisions on promotion and termination of work-related contractual relationships,; for personalized task allocation based on biometrics, biometrics-based, or personal data; and for monitoring and evaluating performance and behaviour of natural persons in such relationships.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3125 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used by public authorities or on behalf of public authorities to evaluate the eligibility of natural persons for public assistance benefits and services, as well as to grant, reduce, revoke, increase, or reclaim such benefits and services;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3163 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
(b) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on behalf of law enforcement authorities as polygraphs and similar tools or to detect the emotional state of a natural person;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3166 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
(c) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on behalf of law enforcement authorities to detect deep fakes as referred to in article 52(3);
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3169 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point d
(d) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on behalf of law enforcement authorities for evaluation of the reliability of evidence in the course of investigation or prosecution of criminal offences;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3182 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point f
(f) AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on behalf of law enforcement authorities for profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 in the course of detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3196 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used by competent public authorities or on their behalf as polygraphs and similar tools or to detect the emotional state of a natural person;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3204 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
(b) AI systems intended to be used by competent public authorities or on their behalf to assess a risk, including a security risk, a risk of irregular immigration, or a health risk, posed by a natural person who intends to enter or has entered into the territory of a Member State;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3208 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
(c) AI systems intended to be used by competent public authorities or on their behalf for the verification of the authenticity of travel documents and supporting documentation of natural persons and detect non-authentic documents by checking their security features;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3213 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
(d) AI systems intended to be used by competent public authorities or on their behalf or to assist competent public authorities forin the examination of applications for asylum, visa and residence permits and associated complaints with regard to the eligibility of the natural persons applying for a status.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3230 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or administrative body or on their behalf or to assist a judicial authority or administrative body in researching and interpreting facts andor the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3235 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
(a a) AI systems used by political parties, political candidates, public authorities, or on their behalf for influencing natural persons in the exercise of their vote in local, national, or European Parliament elections;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3237 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
8 a. Other applications: (a) AI systems intended to be used to generate, on the basis of limited human input, complex text content that would falsely appear to a person to be human generated and authentic, such as news articles, opinion articles, novels, scripts, and scientific articles, with the exception of AI systems used exclusively for content that undergoes human review and for the publication of which a natural or legal person established in the Union is liable or holds editorial responsibility; (b) AI systems intended to be used to generate or manipulate audio or video content that features existing natural persons appearing to say or do something they have never said or done, with the exception of AI systems used exclusively for content that forms part of an evidently artistic, creative or fictional cinematographic and analogous work; (c)AI systems that deploy subliminal techniques for scientific research and for therapeutical purposes;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3280 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. A description of any relevant change made to the system through its lifecycle;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3286 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VII – point 4 – point 4.5
4.5. Where necessary to assess the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2, after all other reasonable ways to verify conformity have been exhausted and have proven to be insufficient, and upon a reasoned request, the notified body shall also be granted access to the source code of the AI system. Such access shall be subject to existing Union law on the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3294 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a.The following information shall be provided and updated with regard to high risk AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 51(2) by users who are or act on behalf of public authorities or Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies: 1. the name, address and contact details of the user; 2. the name, address and contact details of any person submitting information on behalf of the user; 3. the high-risk AI system trade name and any additional unambiguous reference allowing identification and traceability of the AI system used; 4. description of the intended use of the AI system, including the specific outcomes sought through the use of the system; 5. a summary of the findings of the fundamental rights impact assessment conducted in accordance with the obligation of public authorities or Union institutions, agencies, offices or bodies set out in this Regulation; 6. a summary of the data protection impact assessment carried out in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 as specified in paragraph 6 of Article 29 of this Regulation, where applicable; 6. a declaration of conformity with the applicable data protection rules.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1 #

2021/0076(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. Whereas Estonian authorities started providing the personalised services to the targeted beneficiaries on 1 January 2021;
2021/04/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2021/0076(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Estonia started providing personalised services to the targeted beneficiaries on 1 January 2021 and that the period of eligibility for a financial contribution from the EGF will therefore be from 1 January 2021 to 1 January 2023, with the exception of formal education or training courses, including vocational training, the duration of which is two years or more, which will be eligible until 1 July 2023;
2021/04/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2021/0076(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that personalised services to be provided to the workers and self- employed persons consist of the following actions: labour market training, business start-up subsidy and follow up support, apprenticeships, support for formal studies and training allowances, including vocational training allowances;
2021/04/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2021/0076(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the Commission to minimise the time taken to assess EGF assistance requests and to mobilise the EGF, so as to reduce the pressure on national social security systems in the context of COVID-19 crisis;
2021/04/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 2021 assessments, the strategy’s enhanced focus on social and environmental dimensions and its emphasis on the importance of combining crisis management with reforms identified in the European Semester, the transformative aspirations of the Green Deal and the digital transition; underlines that the COVID-19 crisis is having an impact on the notion of reforms, recovery and resilience and highlights the Portuguese Presidency’s emphasis on the European social model as a valuable contribution in this regard;
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the agreements on the multiannual financial framework, Next Generation EU, the own resources (OR) decision, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and the Rule of Law (RoL) regulation constitute a viable baseline for innovative policies and is convinced that the common issuance of bonds at EU level is a sea change in EU public finances whichduring the health and economic crisis to ensure sustainable growth, is a major breakthrough in EU public finances which in the circumstances of the pandemic adds value by mutualising the outstanding credit rating of the EU budget based on its OR system;
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the RRF reshapes the European Semester framework and that, together with the Just Transition Fund, will be an exemplary test case of how EU strategic guidance and financial firepower can be synchronised with national priorities and implementation capacities of reforms that create economic and employment growth, coordination of European policies is fundamental for the European Semester;
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 50 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the urgent need for the recovery and resilience plans to deliver public goods like pandemic prevention, stability of public finances and their resilience against future economic shocks, to sustain our economic base and to contribute to implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights, the EU’s climate and biodiversity objectives, the digital and green transformation, and the Gender Equality Strategy;
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 57 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates the urgency of introducing new own resources to diversifying the EU budget’s revenue sources, in line with the roadmap integrated in the Interinstitutional Agreement, and of linking own resources with policy objectives more effectively;
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 64 #

2021/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to apply the RoL Regulation completely and without ambiguity. as adopted by the co- legislators fully, without ambiguity and with no delay; recalls Commission’s role as guardian of the Treaties.
2021/02/03
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 22 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the Commission has listed a number of problems relating to the implementation of the former regulation, Regulation (EU) 2019/78811/2011, and whereas it has undertaken to take a closer look at the impact those problems have on the effectiveness of the ECI as an instrument, and to improve the way it operates;
2021/09/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 84 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. EmphasisesIs strongly in favour of the development of the role of the Ombudsman, who can use own- initiative powers to help to tackle systemic problems in EU administration and make efforts to promote good administration, i.e. ensuring the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union meet the very highest standards; with that in mind, considers the role of the Ombudsman to be more important than ever in view of the fact that the administration of the EU, via its agencies, is taking on an increasingly important role in citizens’ lives when it comes to issues such as migration and health;
2021/09/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 97 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Stresses the importance of the Ombudsman's transparency-related tasks for European democracy, in particular those concerning the accessibility of documents for European citizens, in order to enable them to fully exercise their right to information and to increase citizens' confidence in the European project;
2021/09/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 106 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Considers it essential for European democracy that citizens be able to contribute to the exercise of the legislative prerogatives of the Union and be directly involved in the initiation of legislative proposals;
2021/09/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 129 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls for public awareness, particularly among young people, of these three participatory instruments to be raised to ensure that they become effective tools for democratic participation; emphasises that all the European institutions should maximise their communication efforts to ensure that as many citizens as possible know about, and are encouraged to participate in, the instruments;
2021/09/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 150 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Considers it essential for European democracy that citizens be able to contribute to the exercise of the legislative prerogatives of the Union and be directly involved in the initiation of legislative proposals;
2021/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 173 #

2020/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls for public awareness, particularly among young people, of these three participatory instruments to be raised to ensure that they become effective tools for democratic participation; emphasises that all the European institutions should maximise their communication efforts to ensure that as many citizens as possible know about, and are encouraged to participate in, the instruments;
2021/09/16
Committee: PETI
Amendment 2 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Asserts that the Recovery and Resilience Facility is reshaping the European Semester process and stimulating reforms that create jobs; underlines that the two processes should be fully coordinated towards building resilience and supporting the recovery from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis; stresses that such resilience should be ensured in such sectors as healthcare and critical transport infrastructure to strengthen the preparedness for economic shocks; highlights that upskilling, crisis- preparedness and adequate availability of employees in critical infrastructure sectors play a key role in avoiding disruptions; calls for the cooperation at all governance levels to ensure crisis- preparedness plans with adequate financing, which would include inter alia algorithms of staff and resources mobilisation in emergency situations;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that in the area of social and employment policies, Next Generation EU (NGEU) and the EU budget can play a subsidiary but instrumental role in triggering, bundling and directing investments towards social development, in particular education, and resilience; appreciates that this role will be enhanced by better coordination of national policies towards overarching EU objectives such as the European Green Deal, the digital transition and the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the EU Gender Equality Strategy;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that vocational training systems provide youth and those who lost their jobs during the crisis with a reliable pathway towards long-term employment, which is a crucial step in overcoming the crisis;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 22 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Underlines that the access to digital infrastructure is still limited for certain groups of the population, stresses therefore the need to increase financing of digitalisation efforts to make sure that all economic actors and consumers have equal access to digital tools;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 23 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the importance of 3. horizontal coordination between EU programmes and national measures for social justice and combating the risk of poverty, including child-poverty, in-work poverty, a lack of employable skills, and income inequalities, the reformed European Social Fund being the prime example; holds, however, that the social and employment impact should be a transversal consideration across all expenditure programmes;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 26 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses that the partnership of public and private financial institutions has an important potential in providing income to the workers who are most seriously affected by the crisis, particularly those employed by SMEs in the sectors of culture, education, tourism and HORECA (hotels, restaurants, cafés);
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 28 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the EU budget’s backstop and borrowing and lending functions, and notably the SURE scheme, are perfect examples of how the credit capacity and reputation of the EU budget can be used to support Member State actions in line with European priorities in the exceptional circumstance of an unprecedented health and economic crisis in the history of the EU;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Highlights that the decline in remittances has significantly affected GDP indicators of some Member States, putting households at the risk of poverty; stresses that the European Semester process should give major attention to migrant workers and the social security coordination systems;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Stresses that the EU’s growth strategy should reduce systemic imbalances among EU Member States and within each of them, particularly addressing growth-enhancing reforms, low spending on investments and unequal access to healthcare, including e- healthcare services; stresses that additional financial resources should be allocated for the infrastructure, education, healthcare and social services in rural areas;
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 37 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Underlines that the delivery of financial resources under NGEU and MFF, as well as public and private resources aiming at recovery and resilience, should be done in the most swift manner in order to avoid further losses; stresses in this regard that the quality and effectiveness of public administration, its transparency and sound financial management are crucial for the implementation of the recovery resources; calls on the European Commission to assist national, regional and local public administration, where necessary, with specific expertise, digital and operational support, inter alia via the Technical Support Instrument.
2021/01/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 27 #

2020/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need to raise awareness at all levels of the rights enshrined in the CRPD for persons with disabilities in order to protect their rights and dignity, and to promote fruitful cooperation and the exchange of good practices between Member States; encourages the Member States to strengthen coordination mechanisms;
2021/04/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 83 #

2020/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Reiterates its call on the Commission to work with the Court of Justice of the European Union on communication and accessibility strategies in order to ensure that persons with disabilities have the ability to access the EU justice system without facing any form of discrimination; stresses the need to pay special attention to women with disabilities as they are two to five times more likely to experience violence than other women.19a _________________ 19aEuropean Commission, ‘Union of Equality. Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ (3 March 2021), p.16, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication- detail/-/publication/3e1e2228-7c97-11eb- 9ac9-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
2021/04/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2020/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Highlights the role of the Undertaking in contributing to the objectives of the European Green Deal; welcomes in this respect, the research and innovation efforts of the Shift2Rail to achieve more sustainable, digital, competitive, reliable and attractive railway system to Europe;
2020/12/15
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 5 #

2020/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Believes that the successor of the Shift2Rail should include in the research programme joint work with other modes of transport to pave the way towards seamless and integrated transport;
2020/12/15
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 6 #

2020/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Stresses the resilience of the rail sector and its contribution to maintaining the supply chain during the COVID-19 outbreak; believes however, that the rail sector will not be able to compete on the transport market, without further automation and digitalisation; calls on the Shift2Rail successor to take this challenge as one of its priorities;
2020/12/15
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 3 #

2020/2184(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls the essential role played by the Undertaking to ensure net accelerations in green technologies aiming at reducing CO2 gas emissions and noise levels produced by aircrafts; believes that its successor, Clean Aviation, will play important role ensuring aviation sector's involvement in the European Green Deal;
2020/12/15
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 6 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that high standards of transparency and integrity in theall EU institutions are essential to enabling citizens to exercise their democratic right to participate in the EU’s decision-making process and thus to enhancing the democratic legitimacy and credibility of the Union while restoring confidence in the European integration process; ; highlights that all EU institutions should abide by high standards of ethics and transparency and calls on all EU institutions to conclude an agreement on establishing a common ethical framework, to reflect these standards; recalls that, in her Political Guidelines for the 2019- 2024 Commission, the President of the Commission stressed that if citizens were to have faith in the EU, its institutions should be open and beyond reproach on ethics, transparency and integrity; recalls that the right to petition provides citizens with the most accessible way to enter into and maintain a direct dialogue with representatives from the EU institutions and thus contributes to improving openness, responsiveness and accountability while bridging the gap between citizens and EU institutions;
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 32 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that a high level of transparency of the legislative process is essential to enabling citizens to hold their elected representatives and governments accountable; reiterates, therefore, its call on the Council to improve its rules and practices on transparency of its legislative process in line with the recommendations of the European Court of Auditors and the European Ombudsman, which have been overwhelmingly supported by Parliament in its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU4 , which was based on the joint report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Petitions; _________________ 4 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2019)0045. 4
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 33 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses that the current self- regulatory ethical framework has proven insufficient, has led to a fragmented approach and to different ethical standards within the different EU institutions; highlights that in order to restore and maintain high levels of confidence in the EU institutions, all EU institutions must abide by the highest ethical standards; recalls in this respect the recommendations of the European Court of Auditors concerning the establishment and implementation of a common ethical framework for all EU institutions;
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 36 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Underlines that public officials are not in a position to self-declare themselves out of conflict of interest or to provide self-assessment with regards to respecting ethical standards; highlights that this task should fall under the competence of an independent specialised third party, in the form of an Independent Ethics Body (IEB) for all the EU institutions, agencies, bodies and offices;
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 39 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the EU institutions should apply the highest ethical standards to prevent any episodes of revolving doors and any conflicts of interests, also with regard to the appointments to senior positions in the EU institutions and agencies; expresses its concern that any such episodes, even if legally admissible, are undermining the overall credibility of the EU institutions and often used by anti- European propaganda as a means of introducing euro-scepticism to the public; calls for the establishment of an Independent Ethics Body for all EU institutions that would overlook the implementation of a future common ethical framework, and have competence over the common rules on the content and publication of declarations of interests, avoidance of conflicts of interest and revolving doors, acceptance of gifts and entertainment, protection of whistle- blowers and victims of harassment, transparency of lobby meetings, public procurement and meeting calendars of senior staff, and use of transparent bank accounts for public funds;
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 51 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the important role that the European Ombudsman plays in ensuring high standards of transparency and integrity in the EU institutions; calls on its Committee on Constitutional Affairs committee to consider and to take into account the experience provided by the European Ombudsman when reflecting on the possible establishment ofing an independent ethics body; suggests the setting up of an EU interinstitutional working group that is tasked with discussing and formulating recommendations on all aspects related to the subject matter;
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 68 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates, therefore, the need for the highest ethical standards for the Members of the European Parliament and calls for a strong advisory body within Parliament , consisting, among others, of highly respectable former Members with a staunch record of responsiveness to the public opinion;deleted
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 76 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the fact that strengthening the existing procedures on the basis of analysis and evaluation of their effectiveness and public response is generally more effective than the introduction of new ones;deleted
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 87 #

2020/2133(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Considers, as the committee most directly engaged with the public opinion and public response to the institutions’ transparency and integrity, that the democratic approach and political responsibility remains the strongest control mechanism in any constitutional democracy, as well as in the EU; stresses the need for further strengthening of the democratic accountability mechanisms at EU level and in this regard encourages the establishment of a common ethical framework for all EU institutions and of an Independent Ethics Body in charge of its implementation.
2021/02/05
Committee: PETI
Amendment 1 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates the importance of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) in providing financial assistance to Member States and regions hit by natural disasters; takes note of the recent revisions made to the instrument; welcomes the recent extension of the EUSF’s scope to major public health emergencies; recalls the increases made to the advance payments of the EUSF, which increased the value of advance payments from 10 % to 25 % of the anticipated financial contribution and the upper limit from EUR 30 million to EUR 100 million;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the number and severity of emergencies is unpredictable; remains concerned about the EUSF’s annual ceiling for the period 2021-2027; regrets that, due to budgetary constraints, countries applying for support as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 will receive under 50 % of the potential aid amountcalls that, for the budgetary period of 2021-2027, the EUSF was merged with the Emergency Aid Reserve in the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR), with a maximum annual ceiling of EUR 1,2 billion; notes that, due to budgetary constraints, countries applying for support as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 will receive under 50 % of the potential aid amount; considers it necessary to monitor the management of SEAR in order to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided have an effect on the effectiveness of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Regrets the lengthy process for the advance payments and final payments in such difficult circumstances and calls on the Commission to accelerate the process of assessment, ensuring that citizens in need can benefit from the Union's support in a timely manner;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. SNotes that on average, the time taken to deploy the full grant on the ground is about 1 year; stresses the need for rapid mobilisation of the EUSF; recalls that the effects of disasters and emergencies are often difficult to gauge; calls, therefore, for timely and flexible assessment of eligible expenditure, in line with the principles of sound financial management, as well as hands-on support to Member States, in particular for damage estimation; highlights that effective implementation of the EUSF grant is contingent upon effective governance structures and institutional coordination in the affected Member State; calls on the Commission to ensure the dissemination of good practices with regard to governance and the use of institutional coordination structures in disaster situations;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the curative nature of the EUSF, and therefore the need for effective synergies with other Union policies and programmes, in particular with the European Structural and Investment Funds, the European Green Deal and those supporting disaster prevention and risk management; calls for a revision of the EUSF to ensure that ‘build back better’ is incentivised;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the lack of visibility of the EUSF, which means the role of the Union is not always clearly demonstrated; regrets that the EUSF Regulation contains neither an obligation to publicise EUSF support nor any reporting requirement on this.; highlights that good practices have been identified in affected Member States for communicating about EUSF support, such as the use of flags and EU logos; calls on the Member States to publicise the EUSF financial assistance and to signal the works and services that will be financed by the EUSF;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2020/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls the importance of the respect of the rule of law principle and the importance of safeguarding the financial interests of EU and considers therefore that the Commission, the European Anti- Fraud Office (OLAF), the Court of Auditors and, where applicable, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) should be able to use the information and monitoring system within their competences and rights;
2021/06/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to urgently agree on capital increase, both cash-in and callable in nature; calls for risks to be taken in the area of green and digital innovation in order to catalyse the just and digital transitions and to stop the financing of stranded assets; underlines that priority should be given to the projects directly aiming at the economic and social recovery from the crisis brought by Covid-19 pandemic;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to urgently agree on capital increase, both cash-in and callable in nature; calls for risks to be takenexpansive investment approach in the area of green and digital innovation in order to catalyse the just and digital transitions and to stopprevent the financing of stranded assets;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Welcomes the ambitions of the EIB Group in reaction to the COVID-19 crisis aiming at general economic recovery, creation of employment, support of vulnerable SMEs, investment in healthcare sector and research;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 23 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates that all financial flows of the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group should be consistent with the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 at the latest and the Union’s new climate objective for 2030; looks forward to the adoption in 2020 of an ambitious Climate Bank Roadmap 2021-25 (CBRM), which is to include a detailed strategic and operational framework with milestones and a shadow carbon price of at least EUR 100/tonne by 2025; calls for allon the EIB to provide technical and expert assistance via Advisory Hub to enable financial intermediaries and corporate clients to have a decarbonisation plan in place by the end of 2021;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 28 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Expects the EIB Group to support by its new operations the goals of the EU Chemical Strategy for Sustainability by boosting innovation for safe and sustainable-by-design chemicals, materials and products, Circular Economy Action Plan based on non-toxic material cycles and upcoming Zero Pollution Action Plan for water, air and soil;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Welcomes the support of the EIB for the development and expansion of renewable energy sources, including geothermal; calls, however, for refraining from support of projects at increased risk of doing harm to the environment and biodiversity-rich areas and for improving disclosure of information and due diligence on projects which it supports;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2 e. Acknowledges the challenges and progress achieved during the implementation of the Natural Capital Financing Facility; calls on the EIB to consider providing a grant component under the Facility to support initial scaling up of local projects and facilitate generating revenues; believes that an evaluation of the Facility should be embedded in a broader assessment of the EIB on how to support ecosystem and biodiversity restoration in the EU;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 36 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expects the EIB to comply with Articles 11 and 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to put on hold disbursement, and, if necessary, to withdraw funding, if there is evidence or a serious risk of adverse impacts; expects the EIB to conduct thorough monitoring that fully takes into account concerns expressed by concerned parties and stakeholders, in particular those pertaining to human rights violations;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 45 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. ExpectsBelieves that the CBRM and the EIB’s revised transport lending policy may not to fall below the standard of EU taxonomy; calls for no new loans to be granted that hinder the decarbonisation of transport, and, in particular, no new financing to be awarded for the expansion of airports, for increased road capacity, for port expansions in Europe and related infrastructure or for the shipping of liquefied natural gas; recommendations of the Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance1a and must apply the Do No Harm principle; calls for no new loans to be granted that hinder the decarbonisation of transport or transition towards sustainable, affordable and zero carbon mobility; highlights the need to ensure full alignment of EIB activities in the area of mobility with the EU climate goals; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/bu siness_economy_euro/banking_and_finan ce/documents/200309-sustainable- finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 48 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Expects the CBRM and the EIB’s revised transport lending policy not to fall below the standard of EU taxonomyto respect the principle of Do No Significant Harm; calls for no new loans to be granted that hinder the decarbonisation of transport, and, in particular, no new financing to be awarded for the expansion of airports, for increased road capacity, for port expansions in Europe and related infrastructure or for the shipping of liquefied natural gas;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 50 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the EIB to dedicate particular attention to the financing of public transport development and modernisation as part of its lending policy; emphasises the need to finance sustainable mobility and sustainable urban design projects, i.a. with the use of the Public Sector Loan Facility, in the areas particularly affected by traffic congestion and underdeveloped road network;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 51 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Acknowledges the importance of technical assistance which can facilitate balanced geographical allocation of investments and optimal absorption of EU funds; believes that current annual target for cohesion lending of 30% of all new operations can serve as a solid stepping- stone for increased investment activities leading to economic, social and territorial cohesion;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 53 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Believes that the new Transparency Policy of the EIB should ensure timely and systematic publishing of the content of the meetings of all the EIB’s governing bodies; calls specifically for more transparency concerning the meetings of the Management Committee and their outcomes, for publishing the minutes of the Board of Directors meetings directly after the meeting and for inclusion of information better reflecting the discussions at these meetings; highlights further the importance of publishing information relating to direct loans subject to the approval of the Management Committee, including by publishing for each project the opinion of the Commission and that of the Member State in which the project is located, as well as the Three Pillar Assessment, Results Measurement (ReM) sheets and/or EFSI Scoreboard, where applicable, along with the GHG Carbon Footprint Assessment, the ERR and FIRR calculations and the Overall Environmental and Social Assessment Form;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 54 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Underlines the need to achieve economic rebalancing between Eastern and Western EU Member States, particularly by investing in the long-term projects in the Member States benefitting from cohesion policy, so as to accelerate the improvement of their development and growth factors and by this means narrow the economic development gap between the countries;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 55 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Encourages the EIB to design its new Transparency Policy in a way that enhances transparency and access to information regarding the contracting and subcontracting system, the results of internal investigations and the selection, monitoring and evaluation of its activities and programmes; calls on the EIB to publish the monitoring reports and promoter’s reports immediately after their receipt;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 59 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the review of the EIB Environmental Social Standards and calls for a wide and inclusive public consultation; expects all projects to include more comprehensive gender and human rights dimensions and due diligence obligations; calls for the EIB to publish ‘Know Your Customer’ checks before approving any project.; calls on the EIB to publish all the projects that have been approved or rejected with the citation of the reason for approval or rejection;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 63 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Believes that the EIB should ensure the highest level of integrity of its financial intermediaries, and that their loans should become subject to the same transparency requirements as other types of loan; calls on the EIB to regularly publish the allocation list of final beneficiaries of intermediary finance operations; calls on the EIB to amend the "EIB template contractual clauses on environmental matters" and accordingly the contracts with the financial intermediaries so that there are clear requirements as to what environmental information needs to be collected by the financial intermediary and passed onto the Bank for publication; calls on the EIB to cease working with financial intermediaries with a negative track record as regards transparency, fraud, corruption, organised crime or money laundering, respect for human rights or environmental protection; stresses that such new requirements should not be to the detriment of access to finance for SMEs;
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 76 #

2020/2124(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Invites the EIB to hold an interinstitutional exchange of views on its contributions towards tackling global challenges and pursuing common goals, including the Sustainable Development Goals, and to assess the progress made with regards to the Resolution on the financial activities of the EIB – annual report 2019 adopted on 10 July 2020.
2020/12/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that, while transport- related emissions of most pollutants have fallen substantially in recent decades, persistent hotspots remain in the EU, where levels of air pollution are too high – especially in urban areas; , due to congestion, increased use of private vehicles, insufficient emission control measures, reduced green space and other factors; underlines that excessive levels of transport-related air pollution particularly represent a risk for the health of citizens living in urban areas and near transport hubs;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 16 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that in order to improve the air quality in these hotspots, it is vital to move towards a more sustainable and less polluting transport system, especially in urban areas, while using all available means in the most effective way and taking into account the most recent scientific evidence and mobility infrastructure design, especially in urban areas and rural areas with lacking or underdeveloped public transport infrastructure, while using all available means in the most effective way and taking into account the most recent scientific evidence; calls on the Commission to assist Member States in carrying out regular transport infrastructure quality checks to identify the areas in need of decongestion and infrastructure optimisation, and take appropriate measures in these areas i.a. with the use of EU funding possibilities;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 31 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages Member States to involve actively the local and regional authorities to devise and implement evidence-based, strategic sustainable urban mobility plans, aiming at a coordinated planning of policies, incentives and subsidies that target the various transport sectors and modes, such as measures to encourage the roll-out of e-charging and other alternative fuels, investment in sustainable and accessible public transport, infrastructure for active, shared and zero emission transport modes and demand- related measures, as well as raising public awareness measures and communication activities of the EU’s role in tackling air pollution;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 52 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the importance of a substantial modal shift from road towards less polluting forms of transportation; underlines, in this regard, the urgent need to improve railroad infrastructure, especially under the framework of the Trans-European Transport Network, and to further ease and encourage intermodality; emphasises the need to improve working conditions for public transport workers, including investment in their reskilling, upskilling and training;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 58 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the enforcement of ecological standards for second-hand cars, as well as the implementation gap in the Union's type approval legislation;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 60 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Regrets that in some cases air quality readings are unreliable or cannot be obtained due to lacking network of sensors; underlines that adequate, harmonised and standardised air pollution reporting and monitoring methods and procedures need to be put in place in all Member States to guarantee that the collected data are exact, unadulterated and comparable;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 65 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the proper implementation and enforcement of the Air Quality Directives1 have proved challenging; urges, therefore, that Directive 2008/50/EC and all other existing legislation relating to transport emissions be properly implemented and enforced first before new measures are proposed.in a timely manner; encourages the Commission and the Member States to further cooperate with the WHO on the update of the Global Air Quality Guidelines according to the latest available evidence, so as to launch the subsequent revision of the existing EU legislation in the field of air quality, if needed and following an impact assessment; _________________ 1Directive 2004/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 relating to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air, OJ L 023 26.1.2005, p. 3, and Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1).
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 69 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the Fitness check of the Ambient Air Quality Directives conducted by the Commission last year; furthermore, calls on the Commission to explore the ways for a swift and more efficient cooperation with national, regional and local authorities to foster the compliance with air quality legislation, i.a. with the use of the EU funding, under the EU Urban Agenda, through the Clean Air Dialogues, and in line with the European Green Deal objectives; calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance and expertise to the national, regional and local authorities encountering difficulties in enforcing and implementing air quality legislation;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 75 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines that civil society organisations, environmental activists and investigative journalists, due to their proximity and direct access to the data on the ground, play a crucial role in fostering and controlling the implementation of ambient air quality legislation, and therefore need to be fully involved in the consultation procedures;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 80 #

2020/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to ensure that policies in the field of air quality pursue the zero pollution ambitions, in line with the Green Deal objectives; furthermore, highlights the importance of the recovery plans supporting competitiveness and innovation in the related sectors;
2021/01/18
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 15 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
— having regard to its Report of 17 May 2021 on the 2019-2020 Commission Reports on Turkey 2019/2176(INI),
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 16 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
— having regard to the Draft Amending Budget No. 5/20201a and the accompanying decision on Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in2020: continuation of humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey2a, _________________ 1aBudget 2020/1157, OJ L 299 11.09.2020, p. 0001 2aDecision 2021/1268, OJ L 298 11.09.2020, p. 0021
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 23 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the revision of the Financial Regulation in 2018 introduced provisions strengthening to a certain extent Parliament’s scrutiny powers when new EUTFs are established or the current ones are extended;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 34 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the establishment of both the EUTFs and the Facility for refugees in Turkey (FRT) have been justified by the need for a flexible and swift reaction not possible under the classical institutional framework; whereas the extra-budgetary instruments such as the EUTFs, as well as extraordinary tools such as the FRT, pose challenges with respect to democratic accountability, includjeopardise the principles of democratic accountability, transparency and sound financial management, undermining the role of the European Parliament and also the integrity of the EU budget;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 38 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas according to the Commission estimations, substantial humanitarian refugee-related needs continue also beyond the Facility for Refugees in Turkey;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 67 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Continues to expresses concerns over the limited role of Parliament in the decision, supervision and scrutiny of the Union contributions to the EUTFs; recalls Parliament’s request to monitor the activities of the Operational Committee, and calls on the Commission to provide in good time detailed information on the decisions taken in that Committee and to ensure that Parliament is represented at its meetings and that Parliament’s position is taken into account;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 74 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the Commission’s efforts to closely monitor and evaluate interventions, and to generate knowledge about the activities of the EUTFs and of the FRT, through a dedicated set of reports; hailsasks to strengthen these efforts to achieve greater transparency by publishing relevant data on the web pages of the EUTFs and the FRT; stresses that the availability, completeness and factual consistency of such reports constitute the precondition for the support of European Parliament as budgetary authority;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 80 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the late evaluations of some of the Trust Funds, which did not allow Parliament to arrive at full and precise conclusions in a timely manner in the case of the Trust Fund for Africa, thus limiting democratic oversight and accountability;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 82 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Underlines that the existing EU institutional framework, NDICI-Global Europe should be used to its full potential, and where necessary improved, while the recourse to extraordinary financing tools should be limited to unforeseen emergencies, so as to guarantee efficiency, coherence and accountability of EU foreign policy instruments;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 84 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Underlines that in its reports the Commission should illustrate the complementarity of different financial instruments dedicated to the areas covered by EUTFs and FRT, including the EU External Investment Plan, as well as generated added value;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 91 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the conclusions by the European Court of Auditors, published in its 2017 special report, that the Bêkou Trust Fund has had positive achievements overall and has attracted aid, but few additional donors, and that most of its projects have delivered their expected outputs and provided enhanced visibility to the EU; indicates however that the report recommended a better definition of the intervention scope, improved donor coordination, project selection procedures, monitoring and performance measurement, as well as optimisation of costs and increased transparency in the selection of implementing organisations;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 98 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the emerging security challenges in the CAR will require well- targeted, flexible EU support under the NDICI-Global Europe to enhance peace and security, democratisation and strengthening democratic institutions, as well as respect for human rights in the CAR;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 134 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the generally strong degree of local ownership, the involvement of local authorities and civil society organisations (CSOs) in projects supported by the EUTF for Africa; notes however that according to the Special report No 32/2018 of the European Court of Auditors, there was a need in an improved project selection procedure, higher implementation speed and a more systematic performance monitoring covering the full range of projects;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 149 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Notes that according to the Special report No 32/2018 of the European Court of Auditors, due to the fund’s broad scope, it often lacked efficiency concerning targeted action due to an absence of adequate quantification of the needs and means through which measured impact could have been achieved;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 165 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that the EU FRT has proven its value as an innovative pooling tool and important coordinating mechanism for assisting Turkey in swiftly responding to the immediate humanitarian and development needs of refugees and their host communities; notes however that the majority of projects needed to be extended to achieve the expected outcome; stresses in particular that according to the Special report No 27/2018 of the European Court of Auditors, greater value could have been achieved in cash- assistance projects; furthermore the report indicates inconsistency in the financing of health and education activities, with a parallel use of different management structures to fund similar projects; additionally the report calls on the Commission to improve the programming for municipal infrastructure and socio-economic support, enable the operating environment for NGOs and improve the reporting on the Facility;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 167 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Recalls that in 2020 the Commission requested a mobilisation of additional EUR 481,6 million under the EU Budget Contingency Margin, which goes beyond the initially foreseen allocation for the FRT, in order to finance the activities under the Emergency Social Safety Net programme and the Conditional Cash Transfer for Education programme;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 177 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Stresses that the refusal by the Turkish authorities to grant access to beneficiary data for the two cash- assistance projects could raise questions as regards the soundness of financial management under the Facility, particularly taking into account Turkey’s rapid backsliding on the rule of law and fundamental rights; calls on the Commission to obtain the data on beneficiaries of all FRT programmes and projects; stresses that in order to achieve full accountability the Commission should make the resources available on the basis of targets achieved by implementing partners on the ground and after the implementation assessment carried out according to the Financial Regulation rules1a; _________________ 1aSpecial report No 27/2018 of the European Court of Auditors “The Facility for Refugees in Turkey: helpful support, but improvements needed to deliver more value for money”, p. 6 and p. 40
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 185 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates its request that Turkey respect the principle of non-refoulement, in particular on the Syrian border, and that it not use the flows of refugees against the EU; stresses that the financial support to Turkey in the management of refugee flow must be conditional on the respect of the rule of law and fundamental rights, full budgetary transparency, as well as unrestricted involvement of civil society organisations; calls on the Commission to build upon its experience in special third- party verification system to strengthen the oversight of spending;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 196 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates its request that Turkey respect the principle of non-refoulement, in particular on the Syrian border, and that itTurkey should not use the flows of refugees as a source of blackmail against the EU;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 199 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Calls on all involved parties of the upcoming Multilateral Conference on the Eastern Mediterranean, to address in a comprehensive way, along humanitarian and development issues, the issues of border management and migration, so as to maximise the added value of EU’s engagement in the region; reminds of the EU long-term objective of a gradual take- over of EU-funded activities by the Turkish authorities in full respect of democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 201 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Reiterates that NGOs and civil society stakeholders should be better involved in managing any pre-accession funds in Turkey, in order to guarantee both transparency and better accountability, while ensuring that funds are used exclusively for the purposes laid down in the agreement with Turkey;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 216 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines the necessity of better addressing the funding needs in situations of protracted crisis and with a view to the coordination and transition between humanitarian relief, reconstruction and development in a flexible and interconnected manner, in a way that it is in line with development policy and humanitarian assistance's objectives and principles, such as supporting poverty eradication, the reduction of inequality and the meeting of humanitarian needs;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 221 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Highlights the need to ensure that projects supported by the EU Trust Funds are in line with international humanitarian and development policy targets such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 228 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to take on board the lessons learned in the establishment, management and implementation of the Trust Funds and the FRT in order to apply them to the new generation of external financial instruments; underlines the need for a full parliamentary scrutiny of these instruments;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 232 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Recommends that a gender- sensitive analysis and consideration of the involvement of women in designing supported projects be prerequisite of implementation of projects under both the EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 241 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates Parliament’s long- standing insistence that external assistance be financed in full from the Union budget and be implemented in a coherent and value-based way, following a streamlined set of rules, based on co-legislated instruments and in full respect of Parliament’s legislative, budgetary and monitoring prerogatives, and of the principles of EU's budgetary unity, accountability, transparency, effectiveness and sound budgetary management; highlights that the adoption of extraordinary tools increases the complexity of financing governance and puts financial pressure on existing foreign policy instruments, thereby possibly affecting their efficiency;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 244 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Stresses that the full transparency and availability of data on EU added value and human rights record in its engagement with the areas covered by the Trust Funds and the FRT is the precondition of the public support for further EU’s development and humanitarian aid in those areas; calls on the Commission to guarantee a more efficient communication on the ground, highlighting the EU’s role as the biggest donor of global development aid;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 257 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is confident that the NDICI-Global Europe will allow for more efficient and predictable allocation of resources, increased flexibility and responsiveness, allowing it to continue the activities of the existing Trust Funds and thereby safeguard the unity of the Union budget; underlines that ordinary decision-making governance framework confers more legitimacy to the EU’ external action, both within the EU and in the destination countries;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 259 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Calls on the Commission to guarantee that the implementation of the EU humanitarian and development aid in conflict-affected areas and areas with considerable refugee challenge is done in full transparency and under a close supervision of EU staff members responsible for the scrutiny, including audit and anti-corruption activities; underlines the importance of sharing the audit data with the EU financial scrutiny framework, including ECA, OLAF and EPPO;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 264 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. In the event of greater needs in the MFF 2021-2027, advocates increasing the NDICI-Global Europe envelope through a revision of the MFF and the NDICI-Global Europe regulations, or a strengthening of the relevant NDICI-Global Europe budget lines with contributions in the form of external assigned revenue; expects that the upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation will ensure appropriate involvement of the budgetary authority in the governance of external assigned revenue; stresses that, should a need for a duly justified new Trust Fund nevertheless arise, it insists that Parliament must be fully involved from the very outset and considers, therefore, that the Financial Regulation shall be revised to guarantee appropriate role of the Parliament in the establishment and scrutiny of Trust Funds;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 279 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that migration-related spending should target reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience within impacted communities, while funds allocated should be based on thorough impact assessment procedures and evidence- driven projections, and include a risk assessment, context analysis and conflict analysis as well; should any serious risk be identified, adequate procedures must be in place to mitigate and counterbalance these risks in a manner that is compatible with human rights and democratic standards;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 281 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30 b. Expects the Commission to publish all its impact evaluation, monitoring, and analysis, especially concerning high risk projects conducted in close cooperation with partner countries' national agencies; reiterates that the Parliament must be able to evaluate and study these reports on a regular basis;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 10 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Council Directive 2008/114/EC17 provides for a procedure for designating European critical infrastructures in the energy and transport sectors, the disruption or destruction of which would have significant cross-border impact on at least two Member States. That Directive focused exclusively on the protection of such infrastructures. However, the evaluation of Directive 2008/114/EC conducted in 201918 found that due to the increasingly interconnected and cross-border nature of operations using critical infrastructure such as high speed rail or air traffic management, protective measures relating to individual assets alone are insufficient to prevent all disruptions from taking place. Therefore, it is necessary to shift the approach towards ensuring the resilience of critical entities, that is, their ability to mitigate, absorb, accommodate to and recover from incidents that have the potential to disrupt the operations of the critical entity and the functioning of the internal market. _________________ 17Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection (OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p.75). 18 SWD(2019) 308.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 13 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Despite existing measures at 19 19 Union and national level aimed at supporting the protection of critical infrastructures in the Union, the entities operating those infrastructures are not adequately equipped to address current and anticipated future risks to their operations that may result in disruptions of the provision of services that are essential for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities. This is due to a dynamic threat landscape with an evolving terrorist threat and growing interdependencies between infrastructures and sectors, as well as an increased physical risk due to natural disasters and climate change, which increases the frequency and scale of extreme weather events and brings long-term changes in average climate that can reduce the capacity and efficiency of certain infrastructure types if resilience or climate adaptation measures are not in place. Moreover, relevant sectors such as certain transport and tourism sectors, and types of entities are not recognised consistently as critical in all Member States. _________________ 19European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP).
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 21 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Those growing interdependencies are the result of an increasingly cross- border and interdependent network of service provision using key infrastructures across the Union in the sectors of energy, transport, banking, financial market infrastructure, digital infrastructure, drinking and waste water, health, certain aspects of public administration, as well as space in as far as the provision of certain services depending on ground-based infrastructures that are owned, managed and operated either by Member States or by private parties is concerned, therefore not covering infrastructures owned, managed or operated by or on behalf of the Union as part of its space programmes. These interdependencies mean that any disruption, even one initially confined to one entity or one sector, can have cascading effects more broadly, potentially resulting in far-reaching and long-lasting negative impacts in the delivery of services across the internal market. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the vulnerability of our increasingly interdependent societies, particularly the transport and tourism sectors, in the face of low-probability risks.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 23 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The entities involved in the provision of essential services are increasingly subject to diverging requirements imposed under the laws of the Member States. The fact that some Member States have less stringent security requirements on these entities not only risks impacting negatively on the maintenance of vital societal functions or economic activities across the Union, it also leads to obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market. The resilience of critical entities gives investors and companies reliability and trust, which are cornerstones to a well- working internal market. Similar types of entities are considered as critical in some Member States but not in others, and those which are identified as critical are subject to divergent requirements in different Member States. This results in additional and unnecessary administrative burdens for companies operating across borders, notably for companies active in Member States with more stringent requirements.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 31 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) In view of ensuring a comprehensive approach to the resilience of critical entities, each Member State should have a strategy setting out objectives and policy measures to be implemented. To achieve this, and taking account of the hybrid nature of many threats, Member States should ensure that their cybersecurity strategies provide for a policy framework for enhanced coordination between the competent authority under this Directive and the NIS 2 Directive in the context of information sharing on incidents and cyber and non-cyber threats and the exercise of supervisory tasks.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 33 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The actions of Member States to identify and help ensure the resilience of critical entities should follow a risk-based approach that targets efforts to the entities most relevant for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities, for example multi-modal hubs for transport, rail infrastructure or air traffic management. In order to ensure such a targeted approach, each Member State should carry out, within a harmonised framework, an assessment of all relevant natural and man- made risks that may affect the provision of essential services, including accidents, natural disasters, public health emergencies such as pandemics, and antagonistic threats, including terrorist offences. When carrying out those risk assessments, Member States should take into account other general or sector-specific risk assessment carried out pursuant to other acts of Union law and should consider the dependencies between sectors, including from other Member States and third countries. The outcomes of the risk assessment should be used in the process of identification of critical entities and to assist those entities in meeting the resilience requirements of this Directive.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 39 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to be able to ensure their resilience, critical entities should have a comprehensive understanding of all relevant risks to which they are exposed and analyse those risks. To that aim, they should carry out risks assessments, whenever necessary in view of their particular circumstances and the evolution of those risks, yet in any event every four years. The risk assessments by critical entities should be based on the risk assessment carried out by Member States. Further harmonisation of security and safety standards and certification requirements is urgently necessary for critical infrastructure sectors, such as safe parking areas and rest areas, where divergent interpretations persist. Welcomes in this regard the standard certification rating system for Safe and Secure Truck Parking Areas.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 42 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council28 , Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 and Directive 2005/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council30 establish requirements applicable to entities in the aviation and maritime transport sectors to prevent incidents caused by unlawful acts and to resist and mitigate the consequences of such incidents. While the measures required in this Directive are broader in terms of risks addressed and types of measures to be taken, critical entities in those sectors should reflect in their resilience plan or equivalent documents the measures taken pursuant to those other Union acts. Moreover, when implementing resilience measures under this Directive, critical entities may consider referring to non- binding guidelines and good practices documents developed under sectorial workstreams, such as the EU Rail Passenger Security Platform31 . Additionally, Member States should recognise essential transport services, such as heavy vehicle parking areas, as an intrinsic part of transport infrastructure conformity with the EU safety and security standards i.a. in line with the Directive 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management. Member States should provide a sufficient number of safe rest areas for the sake of crime prevention and road safety. Nationally adopted provisions of safe parking areas and rest areas shall be subject to audit. _________________ 28 Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 (OJ L 97/72, 9.4.2008, p. 72). 29Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security (OJ L 129, 29.4.2004, p. 6.). 30Directive 2005/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security (OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p. 28). 31Commission Decision of 29 June 2018 setting up the EU Rail Passenger Security Platform C/2018/4014.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 53 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. To that end, this Directive:
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 55 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a To be placed before Paragraph 1 1. This Directive lays down measures with a view to achieving a high level of resilience of critical entities in order to ensure the provision of essential services within the Union and improve the functioning of the internal market.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 58 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall, following consultation with critical entities, adopt by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive] a strategy for reinforcing the resilience of critical entities. This strategy shall set out strategic objectives and policy measures with a view to achieving and maintaining a high level of resilience on the part of those critical entities and covering at least the sectors referred to in the Annex.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 67 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 8 shall establish a list of essential services in the sectors referred to in the Annex. They shall carry out by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive], and subsequently where necessary, and at least every four years, an assessment of all relevant risks that may affect the provision of those essential services, with a view to identifying critical entities in accordance with Article 5(1), and assisting those critical entities to take measures pursuant to Article 11.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 75 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall provide the Commission with data on the types of risks identified and the outcomes of the risk assessments, per sector and sub-sector referred to in the Annex, by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive] and subsequently where necessary and at least every four years.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 79 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. By [threefour years and three months after entry into force of this Directive] Member States shall identify for each sector and subsector referred to in the Annex, other than points 3, 4 and 8 thereof, the critical entities.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 82 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Each Member State shall establish a list of the critical entities identified and ensure that those critical entities are notified of their identification as critical entities within onetwo months of that identification, informing them of their obligations pursuant to Chapters II and III and the date from which the provisions of those Chapters apply to them.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 83 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 8 of this Directive notify the competent authorities that the Member States designated in accordance with Article 8 of [the NIS 2 Directive], of the identity of the critical entities that they identified under this Article within onetwo months of that identification.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 88 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall submit to the Commission by [threefour years and three months after the entry into force of this Directive] the following information:
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 91 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. As regards the sectors referred to in points 3, 4 and 8 of the Annex, Member States shall, by [threefour years and three months after entry into force of this Directive], identify the entities that shall be treated as equivalent to critical entities for the purposes of this Chapter. They shall apply the provisions of Articles 3, 4, 5(1) to (4) and (7), and 9 in respect of those entities.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 94 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. By [threefour years and six months after entry into force of this Directive], and every year thereafter, the single points of contact shall submit a summary report to the Commission and to the Critical Entities Resilience Group on the notifications received, including the number of notifications, the nature of notified incidents and the actions taken in accordance with Article 13(3).
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 99 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ensure adequate physical protection of sensitive areas, facilities and other infrastructure, including fencing, barriers, perimeter monitoring tools and routines, as well as detection equipment, emergency call systems for the notification of competent authorities, and access controls;
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 108 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. As soon as possible upon having been notified in accordance with paragraph 1, the competent authority shall provide the critical entity that notified it with relevant information regarding the follow-up of its notification, including information that could support the critical entity’s effective response to the incident. Where the notification relates to the direct risk to human life, the competent authority shall ensure that relevant public security and safety services are mobilised and sent to the place of incident within a minimum amount of time.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 120 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall provide to the Critical Entities Resilience Group a summary report of the information provided by the Member States pursuant to Articles 3(3) and 4(4) by [threefour years and six months after entry into force of this Directive] and subsequently where necessary and at least every four years.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 124 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
By [5466 months after the entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Directive.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 128 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
The Commission shall, by [6 years after the entry into force of this Directive] carry out a review of the application of this Directive and sector-specific legislation. The review shall focus on identifying duplications/overlapping in the respective legislation, regulatory requirements or procedures, with a view to improve coherence and legal certainty between this Directive and the relevant sector-specific legislation. To this end, the Commission shall prepare a report which it shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied where necessary by a legislative proposal.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 129 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [1824 months after entry into force of this Directive] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 130 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
They shall apply those provisions from [two year30 months after entry into force of this Directive + one day].
2021/05/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 77 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 5 a (new)
Having regard to the report of the Joint Research Centre (JRC)23a, _________________ 23a Huisman, J., Bobba, S.,“Available for Collection” study on alternative collection targets for waste portable and light means of transport batteries, EUR 30746 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92- 76-39084-8, doi:10.2760/64633, JRC125615.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 79 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Batteries are thus an important source of energy and one of the key enablers for sustainable development, green mobility, clean energy and climate neutrality. It is expected that the demand for batteries will grow rapidly in the coming years, notably for electric road transport vehicles using batteries for traction, making this market an increasingly strategic one at European and the global level. Significant scientific and technical progress in the field of battery technology will continue. In view of the strategic importance of batteries and the battery value chain, and to provide legal and investment certainty to all operators involved and to avoid discrimination, barriers to trade and distortions on the market for batteries, it is necessary to set out rules on sustainability parameters, performance, safety, collection, recycling and second life of batteries as well as on information about batteries. It is necessary to create a harmonised regulatory framework for dealing with the entire life cycle of batteries that are placed on the market in the Union. and ensure that all batteries entering the internal market from non-EU countries also meet the high standards set by this Regulation.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 128 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – indent 4
— is neither an electric vehicle battery nor a light means of transport battery nor an automotive battery;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 130 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – indent 4 a (new)
- including toys equipped with a battery as specified in the Toy Safety Directive 2009/48/EC (TSD);
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 135 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘light means of transport’ means wheeled vehicles that have an electric motor of less than 750 watts, on which travel battery’ means any battery in wheeled vehicles that can be powered by the electric motor alone or by a combination of motor and human power, including vehiclers are seated when the vehicle is moving and that can be powered by the electric motor alone or by a combination of motor and human powerexempted from type-approval legislation or vehicles of type-approved categories provided for in Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 and with a weight below 25 kg;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 139 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘industrial battery’ means any battery designed for industrial uses and any other battery excluding portable batteries, electric vehicle batteries, light means of transport batteries and automotive batteries;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 141 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘electric vehicle battery’ means any battery specifically designed to provide traction to hybrid and electric vehicles for road transportof category L as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 and with a weight above 25 kg, or to a vehicle of categories M, N or O as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 2018/858;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 144 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) ‘battery management system’ means an electronic device that controls or manages the electric and thermal functions of the battery, that manages and stores the data on the parameters for determining the safety, the state of health and expected lifetime of batteries laid down in Annex VII and that communicates with the vehicle or appliance in which the battery is incorporated;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 147 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
The Commission shall set up a regularly updated electronic database for the various batteries belonging to the categories laid down in points (7), (9), (10), (11) and (12) of this Article to support clear and coherent implementation of the Regulation.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 339 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
(a a) for light means of transport batteries: 50 %1a by 31 December 2023. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 341 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) for light means of transport batteries: 70 %1a by 31 December 2025. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 343 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(c a) for light means of transport batteries: 75 %1a by 31 December 2030. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 348 #

2020/0353(COD)

3. Distributors shall hand over waste batteries that they have taken back to the producers or producer responsibility organisations who are responsible for the collection of those batteries in accordance with Articles 48 and 49 respectively , or if nationally decided, to an waste management operator with a view to their treatment and recycling in accordance with Article 56.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 349 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1
Operators of waste treatment facilities subject to Directives 2000/53/EC and 2012/19/EU shall hand over waste batteries resulting from the treatment of end-of-life vehicles and waste electrical and electronic equipment to the producers of the relevant batteries or, where appointed in accordance with Article 47(2) of this Regulation, producer responsibility organisations acting on their behalf or if nationally decided, to waste management operators with a view to their treatment and recycling in accordance with the requirements of Article 56 of this Regulation. The operators of waste treatment facilities shall keep records of those transactions.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 350 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. Public waste management authorities shall hand over collected waste batteries to the producers or, where appointed in accordance with Article 47(2), to producer responsibility organisations acting on their behalf, or if nationally decided, to waste management operators with a view to treatment and recycling of those waste batteries in accordance with the requirements of Article 56 or carry out their treatment and recycling themselves in accordance with the requirements of Article 56.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 351 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1
Voluntary waste portable battery collection points shall hand over waste portable batteries to- the producers of portable batteries or third parties acting on their behalf, including producer responsibility organisations, or if nationally decided, to waste management operators with a view to their treatment and recycling in accordance with the requirements of Article 56.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 354 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) for light means of transport batteries: 50 %1a by 31 December 2023. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 356 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) for light means of transport batteries: 70 %1a by 31 December 2025. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 358 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) for light means of transport batteries: 75 %1a by 31 December 2030. _________________ 1a 'Available for Collection' methodology
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 377 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. Contracting authorities, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 3(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, or contracting entities, as defined in Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU shall, when procuring batteries or products containing batteries in situations covered by those Directives, make sure that producers of batteries have registered to fulfil their extended producer responsibility for batteries and take account of the environmental impacts of batteries over their life cycle with a view to ensure that such impacts of the batteries procured are kept to a minimum.
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 396 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
2 a. the weight of the battery;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 397 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Part A – paragraph 1 – point 6
6. chemistry at cell level;
2021/09/09
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 15 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Europe faces a security landscape in flux, with evolving and increasingly complex security threats. Criminals and terrorists exploit the advantages that the digital transformation and new technologies bring about, including the inter-connectivity and blurring of the boundaries between the physical and digital world. The COVID-19 crisis has added to this, as criminals have quickly seized opportunities to exploit the crisis by adapting their modes of operation or developing new criminal activities, which instrumentalise and exploit the debts and the lack of income brought about by the COVID-19 crisis. The Union’s economic recovery depends largely on its capacity to prevent and eradicate financial crime. Terrorism remains a significant threat to the freedom and way of life of the Union and its citizens.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) As Europe faces increasing threats from organised crime groups and terrorist attacks, an effective law enforcement response must include the availability of well-trained interoperable special intervention units specialised in the control of crisis situations. Such operationalisation of investigative instruments available in the Union’s legal framework is especially necessary in view of the unprecedented mobilisation of much higher amounts of financial resources under Next Generation EU. In the Union, the law enforcement units of the Member State cooperate on the basis of Council Decision 2008/617.53 Europol should be able to provide support to these special intervention units, including by providing operational, technical and financial support. __________________ 53Council Decision 2008/617/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the improvement of cooperation between the special intervention units of the Member States of the European Union in crisis situations (OJ L 210, 6.8.2008).
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In recent years large scale cyber attacks, including attacks originating from third countries, targeted public and private entities alike across many jurisdictions in the Union and beyond, affecting various sectors including transport, health and financial services. Cybercrime and cybersecurity cannot be separated in an interconnected environment. The prevention, investigation and prosecution of such activities is supported by coordination and cooperation between relevant actors, including the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (‘ENISA’), competent authorities for the security of network and information systems (‘NIS authorities’) as defined by Directive (EU) 2016/114854 , law enforcement authorities and private parties. In order to ensure the effective cooperation between all relevant actors at Union and national level on cyber attacks and security threats, Europol should cooperate with the ENISA through the exchange of information and by providing analytical support. __________________ 54Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (OJ L 194, 19.7.2016, p. 1–30).
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) High-risk criminals play a leading role in criminal networks and pose a high risk of serious crime to the Union’s internal security. To combat high-risk organised crime groups and their leading members, Europol should be able to support Member States in focusing their investigative response on identifying these persons, their criminal activities and financial assets, and the members of their criminal networks. , as well persons belonging to the national political and financial institutions who are involved in crimes via corruption schemes. Europol should also support Member States in the recovery of criminal assets for their subsequent introduction into public funds.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Europol provides specialised expertise for countering serious crime and terrorism. Upon request by a Member State, Europol staff should be able to provide operational support to that Member State’s law enforcement authorities on the ground in operations and investigations, in particular by facilitating cross-border information exchange and providing forensic and technical support in operations and investigations, including in the context of joint investigation teams, as well as in the recovery of assets. Upon request by a Member State, Europol staff should be entitled to be present when investigative measures are taken in that Member State and assist in the taking of these investigative measures. Europol staff should not have the power to execute investigative measures.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) One of Europol’s objectives is to support and strengthen action by the competent authorities of the Member States and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combatting forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy. To strengthen that support, Europol should be able to request the competent authorities of a Member State to initiate, conduct or coordinate a criminal investigation of a crime, which affects a common interest covered by a Union policy, even where the crime concerned is not of a cross-border nature. Europol should inform Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of such requests.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 24 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Given the borderless nature of the internet, these services can often be provided from anywhere in the world. As a result, victims, perpetrators, and the digital infrastructure in which the personal data is stored and the service provider providing the service may all be subject to different national jurisdictions, within the Union and beyond. Private parties may therefore hold data sets relevant for law enforcement which contain personal data with links to multiple jurisdictions as well as personal data which cannot easily be attributed to any specific jurisdiction. National authorities find it difficult to effectively analyse such multi-jurisdictional or non- attributable data sets through national solutions. Europol should have in place measures to facilitate the cooperation of private parties, including with respect to the sharing of information. When private parties decide to lawfully and voluntarily share the data with law enforcement authorities, they do currently not have a single point of contact with which they can share such data sets at Union-level. Moreover, private parties face difficulties when receiving multiple requests from law enforcement authorities of different countries.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 28 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) Providing Europol with additional tools and capabilities requires reinforcing the democratic oversight and accountability of Europol. Joint parliamentary scrutiny constitutes an important element of political monitoring of Europol's activities and financial management. To enable effective political monitoring of the way Europol applies additional tools and capabilities, Europol should provide the Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny Group with annual information on the use of these tools and capabilities and the result thereof.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 33 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
(41a) It is necessary to provide Europol with additional human and financial resources so that it can carry out the tasks entrusted to it under this Regulation.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 34 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to support and strengthen action by the Member States’ law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy, including the illicit marketing online of pharmaceutical products related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the trafficking of human beings, arms, drugs and oil, environmental crime and cybercrime, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, due to the cross-border nature of serious crime and terrorism and the need for a coordinated response to related security threats, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 36 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Europol shall also provide threats assessment analysis, including the analysis of any potential financial impact, supporting the Commission and the Member States in carrying out risk assessments.;
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 38 #

2020/0349(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2016/794
Article 21 - paragraph 8
8. If during information-processing activities in respect of an individual investigation or specific project Europol identifies information relevant to possible illegal activity affecting the financial interest of the Union, Europol shall on its own initiative without undue delay provide EPPO and OLAF with that information.
2021/04/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) One of the lessons of the COVID- 19 pandemic was that the Center needs to be strengthened and that there is a need for more European coordination of disease prevention and control mechanisms. Good coordination at European level of the prevention and control of diseases that are cross-border health threats is essential. To this end, the Center should have the ability to inspect at source how national coordinating bodies apply this Regulation.
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 b (new)
(8 b) The fulfilment of the Centre's tasks and missions depends on an adequate budget and good cooperation and compliance by the Member States. In order to keep track of Member States' progress in implementing the obligations contained in the Regulation, the Centre may carry out source inspections.
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 28 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Centre shall, within its financial capacity and mandate, perform the following tasks:
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) monitor and inspect health systems’ capacity relevant to the management of communicable disease threats and other special health issues;
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j a (new)
(j a) provide timely information to the Commission, the Member States, Community agencies and international organisations active within the field of public health;
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j b (new)
(j b) The inspection at source must be organized in each Member State, by an inspector from the body of inspectors appointed by the Centre for a period of 4 years. Each Member States should have at least one inspection within the 4-year period, but more inspection can be mandated on a case-to-case basis to offer additional support and monitor progress. The results of the inspection in a Member State must be submitted in a report to the European Commission, the European Parliament, the European Council and relevant EU agencies. The report shall assess Member State's compliance with the obligations imposed by the Regulation and recommendations from the inspectors in order to improve the situation.
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 32 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Centre, the Commission, and the relevant Union bodies or EU agencies and the Member States shall cooperate to promote effective coherence between their respective activities.;
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 33 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Member States shall ensure without delay the coordination and collaboration with the Centre in all the missions and tasks mentioned in article 3.
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 34 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) ensure the financial means and digital infrastructure for the coordinating competent body and facilitate the mission of the Centre by providing timely the information requested
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 36 #

2020/0320(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 851/2004
Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The Centre shall provide technical assistance to European laboratories to develop their detection and sequencing capacities especially in Member States that do not have the necessary capacity.
2021/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas important legislative steps have been taken, including the adoption in June 2016 of the Fourth Railway Package, which regulates rail governance issues and reinforces the role of the European Railway Agency (the Agency) as system authority for ERTMS as well as the revision of the Technical Specification for Interoperability for the on-board and trackside Control Command and Signalling (CCS TSI) subsystems adopted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919, which gives legal status to the ETCS Baseline 3 Release 2 and GSM-R Baseline 1 specifications;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 26 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the European Green Deal calls for a major modal shift to rail and that the new Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy sets the milestones of doubling high-speed rail traffic by 2030 and rail freight traffic by 2050 which require a share increase in rail transport capacity that cannot be obtained without an acceleration of the roll-out of the ERTMS;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 29 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that the ERTMS was launched in the 1990s and its aim is to ensure safety of the railway traffic, to foster interoperability among national rail networks and cross-border rail transport, to reduce the purchasing and maintenance costs of the signalling systems as well as to increase the capacity of the infrastructure and the reliability of the rail transport system;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 35 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the ERTMS has become a global standard for train control and communication, and has been deployed in almost 50 countries around the world providing for excellent opportunities to increase high value business and expertise within Europe and for export; calls for the establishment of a European Standardised Traffic Management system, and believes that a European standard must be swiftly developed before a global rail traffic management system standard is imposed on the EU;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 38 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s work to establish a Control Command and Signalling (CCS) architecture framework to ensure that rail fully embraces digitalisation that builds the ERTMS which should allow for easier and more affordable updates and upgrades thanks to further standardisation and modularisation, by introducing the “plug- and-play” principle and by working on harmonised data modelling;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 47 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the Agency should be provided with the appropriate financial and human resources and powerss well as be further empowered in order to overcome the challenges of ERTMS deployment and functioning that still exist (harmonisation of operational rules and requirement, specification maintenance and change, and public procurement procedures etc.); and to lead the technical introduction of new technologies;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 67 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes there is a need for a regulatory framework for the digitalisation of the rail system, and welcomes the contribution of Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (S2R JU) for addressing the removal of remaining technical obstacles holding back the rail sector in terms of interoperability and through the transition to a more integrated, efficient and safe EU railway market, guaranteeing the proper interconnection of technical solutions; strongly supports its new successor initiative, the system pillar, which coordinates the evolution of the system, new technology developments, migration plans, industrialisation and deployment, especially for the ERTMS, with a view to contributing to more efficient collaboration and better use of scarce resources;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 87 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that there are still currently roughly 30 different national signalling systems; highlights that the Class B systems are a bottleneck for ERTMS rollout and for cross-border operations of rail traffic in European network, require a more expensive and difficult safety authorisation for operators, and are a barrier to the competitiveness of the rail transport hampering the technical and operational compatibility of railways across the EU, and resulting in additional costs for the sector, including for maintenance;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 99 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Reminds that the incompatibilities between the different ERTMS trackside versions already deployed shall be eliminated and future compatibility for all ERTMS lines shall be ensured and in this sense calls for further cooperation between ERA and the infrastructure managers and national safety authorities;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 111 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Deplores the fact that in the five years till mid-2019 almost 80 % of new vehicles introduced in Europe were either subject to a derogation or were exempted from the requirement to fit the ERTMS believes that in view of the ERTMS deployment in the comprehensive network no derogations or exemptions from the requirement to fit ERTMS should be granted to new rolling stock introduced;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 114 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that the timeframe of authorisation processes for retrofit projects still differ because of diverging assessments by the National Security Agencies (NSAs) on the need to re- authorise certain modifications; calls on the Commission to ensure that the authorisation procedures following type authorisation processes are streamlined by means of fast-tracked control operations believes, moreover, that conformity processes should further strengthen the involvement at an early stage of the industrial suppliers and the NSAs concerned in order to promote the large- scale and ambitious deployment initiatives from the railway undertakings;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 116 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Recalls that in accordance with the recent business case study on the nine core network corridors, the dual on-board migration strategy for ERTMS deployment, which focuses on equipping the fleet with ERTMS at first, has a better economic outcome, compared to the dual track-side migration strategy; believes that the track-side migration strategy, which focuses on installing ERTMS on installed on top of legacy systems which are kept operational until the whole fleet is equipped, should also be accelerated, especially in light of the upcoming alignment of the Rail Freight Corridor Regulation with the revision of the TEN-T guidelines and, in this respect calls for further cooperation between ERA, the infrastructure managers and national safety authorities to achieve full compatibility of ERTMS trackside versions;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 120 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Underlines that without standardised interfaces with a “plug-and- play” approach – both trackside and on- board –, the rail system will not be able to introduce and grasp the benefits of the ERTMS game changers like automatic train operation (ATO), future radio mobile communication system (FRMCS), satellite positioning or Level 3;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 121 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Points out that GNSS signal availability relies on virtual balises, which would be less costly to deploy and to maintain; calls on the EU rail industry to develop technical solutions in order for GNSS to enable ERTMS on a large scale; calls moreover on the Commission to consider the introduction of EGNSS in the upcoming ERTMS TSI CCS revision in order to close the residual technological gaps and to embrace the innovation;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 132 #

2019/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Notes that during the period 2014- 2020, the EU budget supported ERTMS deployment with an estimated total budget of EUR 2.7 billion, out of which EUR 850 million from CEF and EUR 1.9 billion from European Structural and Investments Funds (ERDF and Cohesion Fund) in the eligible regions;
2021/03/29
Committee: TRAN