BETA

Activities of Alessandra BASSO

Plenary speeches (34)

Coronavirus outbreak, state of play and ensuring a coordinated European response to the health, economic and social impact (debate)
2020/03/10
Tackling Covid-19 disinformation and the impact on freedom of expression (debate)
2020/06/18
The role of cohesion policy in tackling the socio-economic fallout from COVID-19 (debate)
2020/07/10
Dossiers: 2020/2644(RSP)
Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market - Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online - Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed - Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies - Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence - Intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (debate)
2020/10/19
Dossiers: 2020/2022(INI)
The impact of COVID-19 on youth and on sport (debate)
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2020/2864(RSP)
Democratic scrutiny of social media and the protection of fundamental rights (debate)
2021/02/10
Implementation of the Construction Products Regulation (debate)
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2020/2028(INI)
Rail passengers' rights and obligations (debate)
2021/04/28
Digital future of Europe: digital single market and use of AI for European consumers (debate)
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2020/2216(INI)
Recent cyberattacks on EU institutions and on sensitive national public and private institutions – The EU’s cybersecurity strategy for the Digital Decade (debate)
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2568(RSP)
EU contribution to transforming global food systems to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (debate)
2021/09/15
Dossiers: 2021/2750(RSP)
The EU's role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic: how to vaccinate the world (topical debate)
2021/11/24
A European Action Plan Against Rare Diseases (debate)
2021/11/24
Digital Markets Act (debate)
2021/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/0374(COD)
Digital Services Act (continuation of debate)
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2020/0361(COD)
Implementation of the Toy Safety Directive (debate)
2022/02/15
Dossiers: 2021/2040(INI)
Artificial intelligence in a digital age (debate)
2022/05/03
Dossiers: 2020/2266(INI)
Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court (debate)
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2022/2665(RSP)
A new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labour (debate)
2022/06/09
Dossiers: 2022/2611(RSP)
Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
2022/07/04
Dossiers: 2020/0374(COD)
AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market (debate)
2022/10/04
Dossiers: 2022/2013(INI)
Gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges (debate)
2022/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0299(COD)
Consumer protection in online video games: a European Single Market approach (debate)
2023/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2014(INI)
The EU priorities for the 67th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate)
2023/02/14
The Rights of children in Rainbow Families and same sex parents in particular in Italy (debate)
2023/03/29
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – EU accession: institutions and public administration of the Union - Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence - EU accession: judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement (debate)
2023/05/09
Dossiers: 2016/0062A(NLE)
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – EU accession: institutions and public administration of the Union - Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence - EU accession: judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement (debate)
2023/05/09
Dossiers: 2016/0062A(NLE)
Social and economic costs of climate change in light of the floods in Emilia Romagna, Marche and Toscana and the urgent need for European solidarity (debate)
2023/05/31
Geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products (debate)
2023/09/11
Dossiers: 2022/0115(COD)
Financial services contracts concluded at a distance (debate)
2023/10/05
Dossiers: 2022/0147(COD)
Fighting disinformation and dissemination of illegal content in the context of the Digital Services Act and in times of conflict (debate)
2023/10/18
Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in matters of parenthood and creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood (debate)
2023/12/13
Dossiers: 2022/0402(CNS)
Data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services (debate)
2024/02/28
Dossiers: 2022/0358(COD)
Prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market (debate)
2024/04/22

Shadow reports (16)

REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on the Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market
2020/10/07
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2018(INL)
Documents: PDF(381 KB) DOC(163 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Alex AGIUS SALIBA', 'mepid': 197403}]
REPORT on addressing product safety in the single market
2020/11/03
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2019/2190(INI)
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(74 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marion WALSMANN', 'mepid': 197429}]
REPORT on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products (the Construction Products Regulation)
2021/02/03
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2028(INI)
Documents: PDF(218 KB) DOC(72 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Christian DOLESCHAL', 'mepid': 197473}]
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013
2021/03/08
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2018/0232(COD)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(49 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria GRAPINI', 'mepid': 124785}]
REPORT on shaping the digital future of Europe: removing barriers to the functioning of the digital single market and improving the use of AI for European consumers
2021/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2216(INI)
Documents: PDF(436 KB) DOC(172 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Deirdre CLUNE', 'mepid': 124988}]
REPORT on the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the safety of toys (Toy Safety Directive)
2021/12/14
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/2040(INI)
Documents: PDF(218 KB) DOC(77 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Brando BENIFEI', 'mepid': 124867}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC
2021/12/21
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/0361(COD)
Documents: PDF(2 MB) DOC(1 MB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Christel SCHALDEMOSE', 'mepid': 37312}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directive 87/357/EEC and Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
2022/06/24
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0170(COD)
Documents: PDF(561 KB) DOC(258 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Dita CHARANZOVÁ', 'mepid': 124708}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer credits
2022/09/05
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0171(COD)
Documents: PDF(581 KB) DOC(258 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Kateřina KONEČNÁ', 'mepid': 23699}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products and amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Decision (EU) 2019/1754
2023/03/07
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2022/0115(COD)
Documents: PDF(643 KB) DOC(296 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marion WALSMANN', 'mepid': 197429}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2011/83/EU concerning financial services contracts concluded at a distance and repealing Directive 2002/65/EC
2023/03/30
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0147(COD)
Documents: PDF(291 KB) DOC(129 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Arba KOKALARI', 'mepid': 197406}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Regulation (EU) 305/2011
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0094(COD)
Documents: PDF(916 KB) DOC(424 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Christian DOLESCHAL', 'mepid': 197473}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724
2023/09/21
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0358(COD)
Documents: PDF(405 KB) DOC(166 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Kim VAN SPARRENTAK', 'mepid': 197870}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market
2023/10/26
Committee: IMCOINTA
Dossiers: 2022/0269(COD)
Documents: PDF(780 KB) DOC(346 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}, {'name': 'Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES', 'mepid': 197635}]
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in the matters of parenthood and on the creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood
2023/11/21
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2022/0402(CNS)
Documents: PDF(415 KB) DOC(177 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES', 'mepid': 197635}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the safety of toys and repealing Directive 2009/48/EC
2024/02/20
Committee: IMCO
Documents: PDF(443 KB) DOC(214 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marion WALSMANN', 'mepid': 197429}]

Shadow opinions (5)

OPINION on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
2020/07/06
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2017(INI)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(73 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Kim VAN SPARRENTAK', 'mepid': 197870}]
OPINION on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters
2020/09/09
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2016(INI)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(74 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marcel KOLAJA', 'mepid': 197546}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC
2021/09/30
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2020/0361(COD)
Documents: PDF(557 KB) DOC(337 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Geoffroy DIDIER', 'mepid': 190774}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and targeting of political advertising
2022/12/05
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2021/0381(COD)
Documents: PDF(282 KB) DOC(206 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Angelika NIEBLER', 'mepid': 4289}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products and amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Decision (EU) 2019/1754
2023/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0115(COD)
Documents: PDF(346 KB) DOC(210 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Dita CHARANZOVÁ', 'mepid': 124708}]

Institutional motions (1)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian Ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2021/2577(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(43 KB)

Oral questions (2)

Stoking fears of using cash is fake news
2020/07/08
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Putting forward an EU Strategy for Demography
2021/06/07
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(11 KB)

Written explanations (2)

Implementation report on on-farm animal welfare (A9-0296/2021 - Jérémy Decerle)

. – Vi svenska socialdemokrater valde att avstå i voteringen om jordbruksutskottets genomföranderapport om produktionsdjurens välbefinnande, samt att stödja den alternativa rapporten som tidigare antagits av utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet.Det alternativa förslaget konstaterar brister i EU-direktiven om produktionsdjurens välbefinnande och bedömer att de är föråldrade, ofta otillräckliga och saknar artspecifikt skydd för vissa arter såsom mjölkkor, slaktkycklingar och avelshöns, kaniner, får och kalkoner. Rapporten uppmanar kommissionen att se över lagstiftningen om djurs välbefinnande och hälsa, samt säkerställa att kraven är tydliga, exakta och ändamålsenliga när det gäller att skydda produktionsdjur i samband med födseln, uppfödning, transport och slakt.Vidare betonar rapporten att det i direktivet om värphöns och direktivet om kalvar har funnits en kombination av undantag, vaga villkor och en avsaknad av särskilt skydd i EU-lagstiftningen parallellt med olika nationella regler, vilket har snedvridit konkurrensen på den inre marknaden. Rapporten framhåller att ohälsosam kost med för mycket salt, socker, fett och animaliskt protein utgör viktiga riskfaktorer för sjukdom och dödlighet i EU. En hållbar kost med mer växtbaserade livsmedel och med färre animaliska livsmedel kan bidra positivt till den globala hälsan, klimatet och miljön, och innebära att målen i den gröna given och Parisavtalet uppnås snabbare.Jordbruksutskottets rapport fastslår i sin tur att investeringar i bättre djurskydd leder till ökade produktionskostnader och en ökad arbetsbörda för uppfödarna, oavsett vilken sorts uppfödning det rör sig om, och ytterligare offentliga stöd från EU:s jordbrukspolitik för investeringar i djurskydd efterfrågas. Inkomststödet i pelare I för åren 2023–2027 kräver dock en öronmärkning på minst 25 procent för miljö, klimat och djurens välbefinnande. Dessutom öronmärks minst 35 procent i pelare I (landsbygdsfonden) gällande satsningar inom miljö, klimat, och djurens välbefinnande. Dessa stöd torde stimulera till ytterligare investeringar i bättre djurskydd 2023–2027, samtidigt som jordbrukarnas absorptionsförmåga för stöd till djurens välbefinnande bör säkerställas.Jordbruksutskottet anser att åtgärder för bättre djurens välbefinnande kan vara kontraproduktiva och undergräva hållbarhetsaspekter såsom hälsa och säkerhet, bekämpning av antimikrobiell resistens samt insatser för att minska växthusgasutsläppen. Vi delar inte utskottets bild om att det föreligger en målkonflikt mellan skärpta djurskyddsregler i EU och klimat och hälsa. Istället bör skärpningar av EU:s djurskyddslagstiftning kunna utformas på ett sådant sätt att produktionsdjurens välbefinnande säkerställs, samtidigt som miljö, klimat, och hälsa, samt jordbrukarnas konkurrenskraft beaktas och värnas.
2022/02/15
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2021 (A9-0358/2021 - Nathalie Loiseau)

. – Vi svenska socialdemokrater valde att avstå i voteringen om den gemensamma säkerhets- och försvarspolitiken.Betänkandet understryker nya och framväxande hot som utgår från statliga och icke-statliga aktörer i en multipolär värld, såsom terrorism, den ökade förekomsten av auktoritära styren, hybridhot, såsom it-attacker, desinformation och utländsk inblandning. Betänkandet betonar en ökad militarisering i världen, med tilltagande global maktkonkurrens och geopolitiska spänningar, minskade nedrustningsinsatser och internationella vapenkontrollsystem, spridning av massförstörelsevapen, kärnvapen, och användning av kemiska vapen.Betänkandet noterar en situation av instabilitet och oförutsebarhet vid unionens gränser och i dess närmaste grannskap. Den ryska aggressionen mot Ukraina och Georgien utgör ett direkt och indirekt hot mot den europeiska säkerhetsordningen. Därför understryker betänkandet att ett aktivt engagemang i unionens grannskap ligger i EU:s intresse. Betänkandet noterar med oro den tilltagande militariseringen på Krimhalvön och Ryska federationens försök att destabilisera området kring Svarta havet. EU bör stå upp för folkrätten som det gemensamma regelsystem världens stater har kommit överens om, inklusive varje stats suveräna likställighet och territoriella integritet.I linje med betänkandet anser vi att EU:s röst i utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken behöver stärkas. Unionen bör kunna agera när stater begår övergrepp mot sina egna befolkningar, eller hotar grannländer med vapen och ekonomiska påtryckningar. Genom att slopa kravet på enhällighet inom vissa områden av utrikespolitiken kan EU agera snabbare och tydligare. Vi behöver också stärka vår förmåga att klara vår egen säkerhet. Men säkerhet kan inte byggas ensidigt. Fördjupade relationer med andra, även utanför EU, är en förutsättning för att vi ska kunna skapa en säker värld och gemensam säkerhet.Vi vänder oss dock emot betänkandets skrivningar om genomförandet av ”ett gemensamt europeiskt försvar” samt en ”verklig europeisk försvarsunion”. Den svenska försvarspolitiska inriktningen innebär att vi bygger säkerhet tillsammans med andra. Vi förordar dock inte en militär utveckling inom EU som för tankarna till någon slags gemensam armé. Den snabbinsatsstyrka som förordas i betänkandet får anses duplicera EU:s existerande stridsgrupper.Vidare understryker betänkandet att behovet av att systematiskt ta hänsyn till den europeiska försvarstekniska och försvarsindustriella basens bidrag till EU:s strategiska autonomi. Försvarstekniska samarbeten och forskning bör fortsatt stödjas men det får inte ske på bekostnad av mindre medlemsstater, inklusive svensk försvarsindustri, som bidrar till att säkerställa Sveriges militära alliansfrihet. EU bör fortsatt värna unionens grundläggande principer som öppenhet, innovation och frihandel.
2022/02/16

Written questions (89)

Uncontrolled proliferation of the brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) affecting crops in northern Italy
2019/09/17
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(20 KB)
Putting driving tuition on the same footing as school or university education
2019/10/01
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Turkey's advance in Syria: what action will the Commission take to ward off the migration fall-out and escape of imprisoned terrorists?
2019/10/09
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Requested deployment of emergency team and possible inspections in response to damage caused by brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha Halys) in southern Italy
2019/10/09
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Need for Commission inquiry and scrutiny regarding the arrest of three migrants on disembarkation from Sea Watch 3
2019/10/10
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The need for an intervention to manage the refugee crisis
2019/10/25
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Swift mobilisation of the EUSF – damage caused by bad weather in Italy
2019/11/20
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Disastrous flooding in Venice: urgent EU action required through deployment of the European Solidarity Fund and special funds
2019/11/21
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU investigation into the acquisition of British Steel by the Chinese steel maker Jingye
2019/11/27
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Damage caused by bad weather in Emilia-Romagna
2019/11/27
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Imposition of US trade tariffs in connection with the Airbus dispute
2020/01/10
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Concentration in the maritime transport sector
2020/01/23
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Possible irregularities in use of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) in Emilia-Romagna
2020/01/28
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Consultation of Parliament on future decisions concerning the multiannual plan for small pelagic fisheries in the Adriatic Sea
2020/02/07
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Foibe massacres – importance of European remembrance and the need to preserve it
2020/02/10
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU commitment to remembering the Vajont disaster
2020/02/19
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Turkey’s decision not to stop Syrian refugees entering the EU
2020/02/28
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Increase in the number of children affected by autism spectrum disorder
2020/03/04
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Suspension of flights to and from Italy following coronavirus cases
2020/03/04
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Amendments to the ESM system: Suspension of the ratification procedure
2020/03/11
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
European commitment to economic recovery in the Member States following the Covid-19 emergency
2020/03/27
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Revision of European food strategies in view of the COVID-19 emergency
2020/04/08
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Consumers and airlines
2020/05/12
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Combating the importation of counterfeit products from third countries
2020/05/13
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Need for a health protocol on the systematic prescription of swab tests and serological tests
2020/05/20
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Imports of fake honey from China
2020/07/01
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Casimirri – the Italian terrorist hiding in Nicaragua
2020/07/17
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Request for immunity for pharmaceutical companies
2020/09/10
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
European funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology
2020/10/21
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Italy’s pandemic plan – its updating and secrecy
2020/11/04
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Defending the European way of life
2020/11/04
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Legal duality in the approach to unlicensed tourist guides in the sharing economy
2020/11/12
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The detention of Nasibe Semsai and Turkey’s migration policies towards totalitarian regimes
2020/11/19
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Declassification of the content of the agreement signed with the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca
2020/12/01
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Damage due to exceptional weather events in Emilia Romagna
2020/12/09
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Assessment of the implementation of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/171 in the context of the current economic crisis
2020/12/16
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Failure to provide honorary judges with stable employment
2021/02/12
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Further restrictions on the free movement of commercial vehicles in transit through Austria and Germany
2021/02/18
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Protection of Italian balsamic vinegar label
2021/02/26
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
TikTok’s impact on children’s innocence
2021/03/03
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Follow-up to the reply received to question E-006172/2020 on the issue of unlicensed tourist guides in the ‘sharing economy’
2021/03/12
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Exportation of EU-produced vaccines outside the Union
2021/03/16
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Call for an independent in-depth investigation into the evolution and origins of SARS-CoV-2 in the light of the WHO report of 30 March 2021
2021/04/09
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(11 KB)
New post for Carles Esteva Mosso, in light of the sliding doors phenomenon
2021/04/15
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Use by Google of new technologies to bypass cookie rules
2021/04/20
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Irish Data Protection Commissioner and GDPR complaints
2021/05/14
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
‘Anni 20’ programme on RAI 2
2021/05/17
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Crisis in the building sector
2021/06/01
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Désir d’enfant
2021/09/16
Documents: PDF(55 KB) DOC(10 KB)
REACT-EU programme and funding for research to reduce the costs of beef cultivation
2021/10/29
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Measures to combat the rise in natural gas prices in the EU
2021/11/03
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
‘Men Having Babies’ surrogacy conference
2021/11/10
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Commission communication guidelines
2021/11/30
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Call to change the rules of the automotive sector
2021/12/01
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Increased energy costs
2021/12/22
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Use of the EU Digital COVID Certificate
2022/01/19
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Case of the Rt Hon. Ms Päivi Räsänen and fundamental freedoms
2022/01/25
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Murder of Davide Giri: Europe remembers a European citizen killed on grounds of race in the US
2022/01/26
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Measures to help the trade show and exhibition sector with regard to vaccines not approved by the EMA
2022/01/27
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Request for information to protect and promote the agri-food sector
2022/01/27
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The case of the journalist Sedef Kabas
2022/01/31
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Means used by President von der Leyen to negotiate deal with Pfizer CEO
2022/02/07
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Proposal to extend the Nutriscore system to include alcoholic beverages
2022/02/22
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Potential adverse effects on meat and charcuterie products of the review of the EU's agri-food promotion policy
2022/02/23
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Repeated violations of freedom of thought and opinion at Rome City Council
2022/03/07
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Call for immediate action regarding price rises for energy and basic foodstuffs
2022/03/15
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU initiatives to protect Ukrainian citizens with disabilities
2022/03/18
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Request for guidance from the EU to support Member States in the recovery, rearing and selling of indigenous livestock breeds
2022/04/06
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Monkeypox
2022/05/24
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(9 KB)
‘Uber file’ revelations about ‘revolving doors’ in the EU institutions
2022/07/13
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Delegation of powers and the amended Tobacco Products Directive
2022/07/18
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The case of Mahsa Amini: the Iranian regime’s brutality against women continues unabated
2022/09/22
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Remarks by the President of the European Commission on the Italian elections
2022/09/23
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Fraudulent tax mechanisms on the hotel booking and holiday rental market
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
No to synthetic food: call on the Commission to stop funding for artificial food and to protect agriculture, livestock farming and traditional sectors
2022/12/10
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Illegal Chinese police stations in the EU
2022/12/12
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Doubts over the authorisation for the placing on the market of the house cricket
2023/01/17
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Request for an opinion on the sustainability and use of new technologies for the production of biofuels and biogas
2023/01/17
Documents: PDF(44 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Energy performance of buildings directive: Commission ad hoc measures to support the unique features of Italy’s buildings
2023/01/30
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Reaction to China’s ban on exports of strategic technologies in the renewable energy sector
2023/01/31
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Providing financial support to maternity hospitals to preserve demographic stability
2023/02/06
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Commission proposal on cross-border parenthood
2023/02/22
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Guaranteeing safety in Europe – the case of female Roma pickpockets
2023/04/28
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Damage caused by exceptional weather in Emilia Romagna
2023/05/03
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Damage caused by exceptional weather in Emilia Romagna
2023/05/17
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
European funding for high CO2 emission technologies
2023/06/04
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Right to be forgotten: a fundamental right for European citizens
2023/07/12
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Request for the Commission to take action in response to a new attack on biodiversity in Italy: arrival of the red imported fire ant in Sicily
2023/09/20
Documents: PDF(57 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Culturally motivated offences
2023/09/26
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)

Individual motions (3)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on establishing a Europe-wide ‘Remembrance Day’ to commemorate the victims of the foibe massacres
2021/02/10
Documents: PDF(129 KB) DOC(42 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the organisation of events to commemorate, across Europe, the 700th anniversary of the death of Dante Alighieri
2021/04/07
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(42 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a comprehensive joint action plan for Afghanistan
2021/09/06
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(41 KB)

Amendments (1694)

Amendment 55 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) This Regulation should be without prejudice to shorter periods which may be provided for in national law, and which are more favourable to the creditor. Likewise, Member States, if they deem it appropriate, may provide for indirect forms of compensation for undertakings which are creditors within the meaning of Article 2(9) of this Regulation.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) This Regulation should be without prejudice to shorter periods which may be provided for in national law, and which are more favourable to the creditor. Likewise, Member States, if they deem it appropriate, may provide for indirect forms of compensation for undertakings which are creditors within the meaning of Article 2(9) of this Regulation.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘procedure of acceptance or verification’ means the procedure for ascertaining the conformity of the goods delivered or services provided, with the requirements of the contract as well as the verification of the correctness and conformity of the invoice;
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘procedure of acceptance or verification’ means the procedure for ascertaining the conformity of the goods delivered or services provided, with the requirements of the contract as well as the verification of the correctness and conformity of the invoice;
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. In commercial transactions, the payment period shall not exceed 30 calendar days, from the date of the receipt of the invoice or an equivalent request for payment by the debtor, provided that the debtor has received the goods or services and without prejudice to the provisions laid down in Article 10 of this Regulation. This period shall apply both to the transactions between undertakings and between public authorities and undertakings. The same payment period shall also apply to the supply of non- perishable agricultural and food products on a regular and non-regular basis as referred to in Articles 3(1)(a), point (i), second indent and 3(1)(a), point (ii), second indent of Directive (EU) 2019/633, unless Member States provide for a shorter payment period for such products.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. In commercial transactions, the payment period shall not exceed 30 calendar days, from the date of the receipt of the invoice or an equivalent request for payment by the debtor, provided that the debtor has received the goods or services and without prejudice to the provisions laid down in Article 10 of this Regulation. This period shall apply both to the transactions between undertakings and between public authorities and undertakings. The same payment period shall also apply to the supply of non- perishable agricultural and food products on a regular and non-regular basis as referred to in Articles 3(1)(a), point (i), second indent and 3(1)(a), point (ii), second indent of Directive (EU) 2019/633, unless Member States provide for a shorter payment period for such products.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the ability of parties to agree, subject to the relevant provisions of applicable national law, on payment schedules providing for instalments.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the ability of parties to agree, subject to the relevant provisions of applicable national law, on payment schedules providing for instalments.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 175 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. A procedure of acceptance or verification may be exceptionally provided for in national law only where strictly necessary due to the specific nature of the goods or services. In that case, the contract shall describe the details of the procedure of acceptance or verification, including its duration.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 175 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. A procedure of acceptance or verification may be exceptionally provided for in national law only where strictly necessary due to the specific nature of the goods or services. In that case, the contract shall describe the details of the procedure of acceptance or verification, including its duration.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The payment period set out in paragraph 1 is also without prejudice to national rules on grouping invoices received by the debtor from the same creditor during a limited period of time.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The payment period set out in paragraph 1 is also without prejudice to national rules on grouping invoices received by the debtor from the same creditor during a limited period of time.
2023/12/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Interest for late payment shall be automatically due by the debtor to the creditor, without the creditor needing to send a reminder, where the following conditions are satisfied:
2023/12/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. It shall not be possible for the creditor to waive its right to obtain interest for late payment.deleted
2023/12/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) refusing of, opposing or not consent to the assignment of credits to supervised intermediaries.
2023/12/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 403 #

2023/0323(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. It shall apply from [OP: please insert the date = 124 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
2023/12/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Essential safety requirements for toys should ensure protection from all relevant health and safety hazards posed by toys, for users or third parties. Particular safety requirements should cover the physical and mechanical properties, flammability, chemical properties, electrical properties, hygiene and radioactivity to ensure that the safety of children, and in particular of children with disabilities, is adequately protected against those specific hazards. Since it is possible that toys which present hazards that are not covered by a particular safety requirement might exist or be developed, it is necessary to maintain a general requirement of safety to ensure protection of children in respect of such toys. The safety of toys should be determined by reference to the intended use, while taking into account also the foreseeable use, and bearing in mind the behaviour of children, who do not generally show the same degree of care as the average adult user. Together, the general safety requirement and the particular safety requirements should form the essential safety requirements for toys.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of this Regulation, a product shall be considered to be intended for use in play by children under 14 years of age, or by children of any other specific age group below 14 years, where a parent or supervisor can reasonably assume, by virtue of the functions, dimensions and characteristics of that product, that it is intended for use in play by children of the relevant age group.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Toys shall not present a risk to the safety or health of users or third parties, including the psychological and mental health, well- being and cognitive development of children, when they are used as intended or in a foreseeable way, bearing in mind the behaviour of children.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Where necessary to ensure their safe use, toys shall bear a general warning specifying appropriate user limitations. The user limitations shall include at least the minimum or maximum age of the user and, where appropriate, the required abilities of the user, the maximum or minimum weight of the user and the need to ensure that the toy is used only under adult supervision.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Where manufacturers consider, or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in that manufacturer's possession, that a toy which they have placed on the market is not in conformity with this Regulation, they shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring that toy into conformity, withdraw it or recall it, as appropriate.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 218 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Where manufacturers consider, or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in that manufacturer's possession, that a toy presents a risk, they shall immediately provide information thereof to:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) cooperate with the competent national authorities, at their request, on any action taken to eliminate in an effective manner the risks posed by toys covered by the mandate.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article12a Obligations of economic operators in the case of distance sales Where economic operators make toys available on the market online or through other means of distance sales, the offer of those toys shall clearly and visibly indicate at least the following information: (a) name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the manufacturer, as well as the postal and electronic address at which they can be contacted; (b) where the manufacturer is not established in the Union, the name, postal and electronic address of the responsible person within the meaning of Article 16(1) of this Regulation or Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and; (d) any warning or safety information to be affixed to the toy or to the packaging or included in an accompanying document in accordance with this Regulation or the applicable Union harmonisation legislation in a language which can be easily understood by consumers, as determined by the Member State in which the toy is made available on the market.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article12a Obligations of economic operators in the case of distance sales Where economic operators make toys available on the market online or through other means of distance sales, the offer of those toys shall clearly and visibly indicate at least the following information: (a) name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the manufacturer, as well as the postal and electronic address at which they can be contacted; (b) where the manufacturer is not established in the Union, the name, postal and electronic address of the responsible person within the meaning of Article 16(1) of this Regulation or Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and; (d) any warning or safety information to be affixed to the toy or to the packaging or included in an accompanying document in accordance with this Regulation or the applicable Union harmonisation legislation in a language which can be easily understood by consumers, as determined by the Member State in which the toy is made available on the market.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 349 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 10
10. The personnel of a conformity assessment body shall observe professional secrecy with regard to all information obtained in carrying out their tasks under Annex IV, except in relation to the competent authorities of the Member State in which its activities are carried out. Intellectual property rights and trade secrets, in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/943 shall be protected.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 349 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 10
10. The personnel of a conformity assessment body shall observe professional secrecy with regard to all information obtained in carrying out their tasks under Annex IV, except in relation to the competent authorities of the Member State in which its activities are carried out. Intellectual property rights and trade secrets, in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/943 shall be protected.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 357 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 9
9. The information referred to in paragraphs 2, 4, 6 and 8 of this Article shall be communicated through the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. That communication shall not affect the obligation on market surveillance authorities to notify measures taken against products presenting a serious risk in accordance with Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and strictly enforce Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 given the vulnerability of children to defective, unsafe or counterfeit products.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 357 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 9
9. The information referred to in paragraphs 2, 4, 6 and 8 of this Article shall be communicated through the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. That communication shall not affect the obligation on market surveillance authorities to notify measures taken against products presenting a serious risk in accordance with Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and strictly enforce Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 given the vulnerability of children to defective, unsafe or counterfeit products.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 430 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part A – point 2
2. N-nitrosamines and N-nitrosatable substances are prohibited in toys where the migration of those substances is equal to or higher than: a) toys intended for use by children under 36 months or in other toys intendedand intended or likely to be placed into the mouth where the migration of those substances is equal to or higher than 0,01 mg/kg for nitrosamines and 0,1 mg/kg for: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,01; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 0,1 b) toys intended for use by children under 36 months not covered by a): N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 c) toys intended for use by children of 36 months and over and intended to be placed into the mouth: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 d) balloons: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 e) finger paints: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,02; N- nitrosatable substances. mg/kg: 1
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 430 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part A – point 2
2. N-nitrosamines and N-nitrosatable substances are prohibited in toys where the migration of those substances is equal to or higher than: a) toys intended for use by children under 36 months or in other toys intendedand intended or likely to be placed into the mouth where the migration of those substances is equal to or higher than 0,01 mg/kg for nitrosamines and 0,1 mg/kg for: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,01; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 0,1 b) toys intended for use by children under 36 months not covered by a): N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 c) toys intended for use by children of 36 months and over and intended to be placed into the mouth: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 d) balloons: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,05; N- nitrosatable substances mg/kg: 1 e) finger paints: N-nitrosamines mg/kg: 0,02; N- nitrosatable substances. mg/kg: 1
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In order to provide for effective means of achieving the objectives of the customs union, a number of rules and procedures regulating how goods are brought into or taken out of the customs territory of the Union should be revised and, simplified and harmonized. A modern, integrated set of interoperable electronic services should be provided for collecting, processing and exchanging information relevant for implementing customs legislation (European Union Customs Data Hub, ‘EU Customs Data Hub’). A European Union Customs Authority (‘EU Customs Authority’) should be established as a central, operational capacity for the coordinated governance of the customs union in specific areas.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) The non-Union goods that are brought to the customs territory of the Union should be considered to be in temporary storage from the moment the carrier notifies their arrival until their placement under a customs procedure unless they are already placed in transit. To ensure appropriate customs supervision, this situation should be limited in time. It should not last more than 10 days, except in exceptional cases. If the importer needs to store the goods for a longer period, the goods should be in a customs warehouse, where the goods can be stored without time limit. The existing authorisations for temporary storage locations should therefore be converted into customs warehouse authorisations if the relevant requirements are met.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 198 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 18 –point b
(b) pose a threat to the security and safety of theUnion and itspublic health ofUnion citizens and residents; or
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. An importer or exporter,, exporter or customs representative who is resident or registered in the customs territory of the Union, meets the criteria set out in paragraph 3 and has conducted regular customs operations in the course of that person’s business for at least 3 years, may apply for the status of Trust and Check trader to the customs authority of the Member State where that person is established.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Where a Trust and Check trader changes its Member State of establishment, the customs authorities of the receiving Member State may reassess the Trust and Check authorisation, after consultation with the Member State that initially granted the status and having received the previous records on the operators. During the reassessment, the customs authority of the Member State that granted the initial authorisation may suspend it.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Customs authorities mayshall authorise Trust and Check traders:
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 269 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. A customs representative having the status of Trust and Check trader shall only be recognised as such when acting as indirect representative. When acting as a direct representative, the customs representative may be recognised as Trust and Check trader if the person in whose name and on whose behalf that representative is acting has been granted such status or is a small and micro enterprise pursuant to Reccomendation 2003/361/EC or is an authorised economic operator pursuant to the present Regulation.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. For the purposes of paragraph 3 of this Article, the Commission shall adopt and publish guidelines setting out common principles and practices for the implementation of obligations pursuant to Articles 20 and 22 respectively.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Enable interoperability with the EU Maritime Single Window Environment for the provision and fulfilment of the customs formalities indicated in the Reporting Obligations Annex of Regulation 2019/1239.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 9
9. Until the date in Article 265(3), the entry summary declaration submitted in accordance with the rules and data rrquirements set down in Regulation 952/2013, its Implementing and Delegated Acts shall be considered the advance cargo information.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Until the date in Article 265(3), the Arrival Notification shall be submitted in accordance with the rules and data requirements set down in Regulation 952/2013, its Implementing and Delegated acts.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 339 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4
4. Where the arrival of the means of transport and of the consignments therein is not covered by the notification referred to in paragraph 1, theGoods which are brought into the customs territory of the Union by sea or air and which remain on board the same means of transport for carrierage, shall notify the arrival of thegoods broughtonly be notified as ‘arrived’ into the customs territory of the Union by sea or air at the port or airport where they are unloaded or transhipped.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 340 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 6
6. TFrom the date set out in article 265 (3) and only under exceptional cases,the carrier shall not unload, in the customs territory of the Union, the goods for which a minimum advance cargo information has not been provided or made available to customs, unless the customs authorities have requested the carrier to present them in accordance with Article 85. (9) The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 261, to supplement this Regulation by determining the minimum advance cargo data referred to in paragraph 6 and the specific circumstances when the carrier can be prevented from unloading the cargo.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 341 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2
2. The customs authorities shall require the carrier , without prejudice to article 80(5),to present the goods and provide the advance cargo information referred to in Article 80, where this information has not been provided at an earlier stage.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 342 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Until the date in Article 265(3), the Presentation Notification shall be submitted in accordance with the rules and data requirements set down in Regulation 952/2013, its Implementing and Delegated acts.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 343 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Until the date in Article 265(3), the Temporary Storage Declaration shall be submitted in accordance with the rules and data requirements set down in Regulation 952/2013, its Implementing and Delegated acts.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 344 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 5
5. Non-Union goods in temporary storage shall be placed under a customs procedure no later than 30 days after the notification of their arrival or no later than 6 days after the notification of their arrival in the case of an authorised consignee as referred to in Article 116(4), point (b),unless the customs authorities require the goods to be presented. In exceptional cases, that time limit may be extendunless the customs authorities do not require the goods to be presented.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The possibility of using compulsory licences in situations of national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency is explicitly envisaged under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (‘TRIPS Agreement’)3 . The provisions of this Regulation should be consistent with TRIPS Agreement's obligations, in particular with respect to the protection of trade secrets. _________________ 3 OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 214
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Therefore, it is necessary to establish a compulsory licence for crisis or emergency management at Union level. Under this system, the Commissionuncil should be the institution empowered to grant a compulsory licence that is valid throughout the Union and that allows the manufacturing and distribution of products necessary to address a crisis or emergency in the Union (‘Union compulsory licence’).
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 64 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) These mechanisms provide for the activation of an emergency or crisis mode and aim at providing the means to address Union emergencies. By allowing the Commissionuncil to grant a compulsory licence when a crisis or emergency mode has been activated by a Union legal act, the necessary synergy between the existing crisis mechanisms and a Union wide compulsory licencing scheme is achieved. In such a case, the determination of the existence of a crisis or emergency depends solely on the Union legal act underlying the crisis mechanism and the crisis definition included therein. For the sake of legal certainty, the crisis mechanisms that qualify as Union emergency or extreme urgency measures and that can trigger a Union compulsory licence should be listed in an Annex to this Regulationpunctually listed.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) To ensure optimal efficiency of the Union compulsory licence as a tool to address crises, it should be made available in respect of a granted patent or utility model, of a published patent application or a supplementary protection certificate. The Union compulsory licence should equally apply to a national patents, European patents and European patents with unitary effect.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 68 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The Union compulsory licence should also apply to published patent applications for national patents and for European patents. As the grant of a patent after the publishing of the patent application can take years, targeting only inventions protected by a granted patent could prevent an effective and timely crisis response. In crises, solutions can derive from the latest state-of-the-art technology. Moreover, certain national patent legislations, as well as the European Patent Convention, provide for protection of patent applicants with regard to unconsented use of their inventions and the corresponding possibility for such applicants to licence the use of their patent application rights. In order to ensure that a Union compulsory licence on a published patent application continues to keep its effects once the patent is granted, the Union compulsory licence for published patent applications should extend to the patent once granted to the extent that the crisis- relevant product still falls within the scope of the patent claims.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) When a compulsory licence has been granted, regulatory data protection may, if still in force, prevent the effective use of the compulsory licence as it impedes the authorisation of generic medicinal products. This would result in serious negative consequences for Union compulsory licences granted to tackle a crisis, as this could hamper access to the medicinal products needed to address the crisis. For this reason, Union pharmaceutical legislation (cf. Art. 80 para. 4 of Directive (EU) No XXX/XX [COM(2023)192]) provides for the suspension of data exclusivity and market protection when a compulsory licence has been issued to tackle a public health emergency. Such suspension is allowed only in relation to the compulsory licence granted and its beneficiary and must comply with the objectives, the territorial scope, the duration, and the subject- matter of the granted compulsory licence. The suspension means that the data exclusivity and market protection produce no effect in relation to the licensee of the compulsory licence while that licence is in effect. When the compulsory licence ends, the data exclusivity and market protection resume their effect. The suspension should not result in an extension of the original duration of the regulatory data protection.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 71 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to ensure as much coherence as possible with existing crisis mechanisms and with other Union legislation, the definition of a ‘crisis- relevant product’ should be based on the definition adopted in the Single Market Emergency Instrument (SMEI) but should be more general in order to cover products related to different kinds of crises or emergencies.Deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 74 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) A Union compulsory licence authorises the use of a protected invention without the consent of the rights-holder. Therefore, it must only be granted exceptionally and under conditions that take into account the interests of the rights- holder. This includes and the availabilities of possible licensees. This includes an in-depth dialogue phase with the right-holder, a screening of possible licensees, a clear determination of the scope, duration and territorial coverage of the licence. In the context of a Union level crisis mechanism, the crisis mode or emergency mode is activated or declared for a limited period of time. Where a Union compulsory licence is granted within such framework, the duration of the licence shall not extend beyond the duration of the activated or declared crisis or emergency mode. In order to ensure that the compulsory licence fulfils its objective as well as its conditions, the use of the invention should only be authorised to a qualified person able to manufacture the crisis-relevant product and to pay a reasonable remuneration to the rights-holder. The granting of a compulsory licence is in any case preceded by a stage enabling the right holder and the possible licensee to negotiate in order to reach a voluntary agreement, which should remain the preferred option.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When considering the granting of a Union compulsory licence, the Commission should, in order to be able to take a well-informed decision, bthe assisted byance of an advisory body must be envisaged. The consultation of the advisory body should arise early in the discussions on the need to issue a compulsory licence under the relevant instrument. Discussions on whether there is a need for a Union compulsory licence will often start already in the context of the work of the advisory body involved in the context of the relevant Union crisis or emergency mechanisms. In such case, there is no need for the Commission to convene the advisory body but rather to swiftly indicate that that body also has the competence to assess the need for compulsory licensing at Union level, and the conditions thereof. In the latter case, each Member State may indicate one expert on intellectual property to take part in the work of the advisory body. Clarification as regards the competence of the advisory body should be given early in the process, as soon as concrete consideration of using compulsory licensing at Union level is expressed by the Commission.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) patents, including published patent applications;
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 136 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) "Crisis" means the following crisis or emergency modes: – Public health emergency at Union level formally recognized by means of a Commission implementing act under Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 1082/2013/EU; – Emergency framework activated by the adoption of a Council Regulation under Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 of 24 October 2022 on a framework of measures for ensuring the supply of crisis-relevant medical countermeasures in the event of a public health emergency at Union level; – Crisis stage activated by a Council implementing act under Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 September 2023 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/694 (Chips Act).
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 137 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(ab) "Advisory Body" means the advisory body deemed competent according to the relevant legislation on the crisis mode or emergency instrument triggered, in particular: – the Advisory Committee on public health emergencies under Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on serious cross- border threats to health and repealing Decision No 1082/2013/EU; – the Health Crisis Board under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 of 24 October 2022 on a framework of measures for ensuring the supply of crisis of relevant medical countermeasures in the event of a public health emergency at Union level; – the European Semiconductor Board under Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 September 2023 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/694 (Chips Act).
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 144 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Commissionuncil may grant a Union compulsory licence where a crisis mode or an emergency mode listed in the Annex to this Regulationunder in Article 3 (aa) has been activated or declared in accordance with one of the Union acts listed in that Annexherein.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 161 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. A Union compulsory licence for an invention protected by a published patent application shall cover a patent granted based on that application, provided that the granting of that patent takes place while the Union compulsory licence is valid.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 164 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. When the Commission considers the granting of a Union compulsory licence, it shall without undue delay consult an advisory bod is considered, an advisory body shall be consulted without undue delay.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 167 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The advisory body referred to in paragraph 1 shall be the advisory body competent for the Union crisis or emergency mechanism as listed in Annex I to this Regulation (the ‘competent advisory body’).under Article 3 (ab), with the participation of intellectual property experts appointed by Member States. For the purposes of the present Regulation, the competent advisory body shall give assistance and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 184 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) shall, in any case, engage in a preliminary dialogue with the right holder, whose right to be heard shall always be guaranteed, and encourage the reaching of voluntary licensing agreements.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 186 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. In the absence of any existing competent advisory body composed by representatives of all Member States, the tasks referred to in paragraph 2 shall be performed by an ad hoc advisory body set up by the Commission (the ‘ad hoc advisory body’). The Commission shall chair the ad hoc advisory body and ensure its secretariat. Each Member State shall have the right to be represented in the ad hoc advisory body.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Before proposing the granting of a Union compulsory licence, the Commission shall first notify the relevant rights-holder that a Union compulsory licence may be granted. The right to be heard of the right holder before adopting a proposal pursuant to Article 7(7) shall be ensured. Article 19 shall apply mutatis mutandis. The Commission shall then give the rights-holder and the identified licensees an opportunity to comment on the following:
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 204 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the conditions under which the Commission intends to grant the Union compulsory licence, includingpropose to the Council the amougrant of the remunerationUnion compulsory licence.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 205 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall notify the rights-holder and the licensee as soon as possible of the fact that a Union compulsory licence may be granted. Wherever the identification of the rights- holders is possible and does not cause significant delay, the Commission shall notify them individually.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 207 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. When the Commission considers that the conditions for the granting of a Union compulsory licence are met, it shall without undue delay publish a notice to inform the public about the initiation of the procedure under this article. This notice shall also include, where already available and relevant, information on the subject of the compulsory licence and an invitation to submit comments in accordance with paragraph 3. The notice shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 217 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. Where the Commission find, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory body, considers that the requirements for a Union compulsory licence are met, the Commission shall grant itpropose to the Council to grant it. The Council may grant a Union compulsory licensing by means of an Council implementing act. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 24(2).duration and the definition of the crisis-relevant products shall be specified in the implementing act. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(4). In case of procedure under Article 24(4), the implementing act shall remain in force for a period not exceeding 12 months.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 219 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8
8. When adopting the implementing act, the Commission shall ensure the protection of confidential information shall be protected. While respecting the confidentiality of the information, ithe Commission shall be ensured that any information relied on for the purpose of its decision is disclosed to an extent that allows to understand the facts and considerations that led up to the adoption of the implementing act.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 224 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the patent, patent application, supplementary protection certificate or utility model for which the licence is granted or, where the identification of those rights would significantly delay the granting of the licence, the non-proprietary name of the products which are to be manufactured under the licence;
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 226 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the right-holder, provided they can be identified with reasonable efforts having regard to the circumstances, including the urgency of the situation;
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 227 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the duration for which the Union compulsory licence is granted, with an initial suspension period the duration of which shall not be less than ten days from the day following the day of publication of the Union compulsory license in the Official Journal of the European Union, for the purpose of a possible judicial review;
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 231 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, point (e), the Commission may determine the remuneration after the granting of the licence, by way of an implementing act, where that determination requires, further investigation and consultation. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the rules referred to in Article 7(6) (a) and (b), 7(7) and 7(8).deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 232 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8a Review by the Court of Justice of the European Union 1. The Court of Justice of the European Union has jurisdiction to review the grounds and the conditions under which a Union compulsory licence has been granted. 2. An implementing act granting a Union compulsory licence shall not take effect before the end of an initial suspension period which shall not be less than 10 calendar days from the day following the day of publication of the Union compulsory license in the Official Journal of the European Union. 3. The right-holder or the licensee may lodge, before the expiry of the suspension period, an application for annulment of the implementing act. Such an application shall have a suspensive effect.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 235 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The licensee shall pay anright holder shall be paid adequate remuneration toin the rights-holder. The amount of the remuneration shall be determined by the Commission and specified in the Union compulsory licencecircumstances of each case, taking into account the economic value of the authorization.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 240 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The remuneration shall not exceed 4 % ofbe determined based on the total gross revenue generated by the licensee through the relevafrom the pertinent activities under the Union compulsory licence.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 242 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. When determining the remuneration, the Commissionfollowing elements shall be consider the followinged:
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 246 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. If the published patent application for which a compulsory licence has been granted does not subsequently lead to the granting of a patent, the rights-holder shall refund the remuneration paid under this article to the licensee.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 257 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in cooperation with the relevant national authorities of the Member States may, at the request of the rights-holder or on its own initiative, request access to books and records kept by the licensee, for the purpose of checking whether the content and the conditions of the Union compulsory licence, and in general the provisions of this Regulation, have been complied with.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 270 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall propose to the Council to review the Union compulsory licence upon reasoned request by the rights-holder or the licensee or on its own initiative and shall, where needed, to modify the specifications referred to in Article 8 or to establish additional measures complementing the Union compulsory licensing to ensure it achieves its objective as well as to facilitate and ensure the good collaboration between the rights-holder and the licensee. The Council shall act by means of an implementing act. Where necessary, the Union compulsory licence shall be modified to indicate the complete list of rights and rights-holders covered by the compulsory licence.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 273 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. Where necessary, the Commission shall decide upon reasoned request by the rights-holder or the licensee or on its own initiative on additional measures complementing the Union compulsory licence to ensure it achieves its objective as well as to facilitate and ensure the good collaboration between the rights-holder and the licensee.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 275 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. A Union compulsory licence may be terminated by the Commissionuncil by means of an implementing act where the circumstances which led to it cease to exist and are unlikely to recur or where the licensee fails to comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 277 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. When the Commission considers the proposal of modifying, adopting additional measures as referred to in paragraph 21, or terminating the Union compulsory licence, it may consult the advisory body referred to in Article 6.
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 279 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 shall be adopted in accordance with the rules referred to in Article 7(6) (a) and (b), 7(7) and 7(8).
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 299 #

2023/0129(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
[...]deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: JURI
Amendment 50 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The objective of this Regulation is to address the risks associated with the circulation of non-road mobile machinery on public roads. Thus, non-road mobile machinery that will not circulate on public roads should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. As regards non-road mobile machinery under individual approval, the manufacturer may choose either to apply the requirements under this Regulation, where appropriate, or to comply with the relevant national legislation referred to in point (f) of the first subparagraph.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. As regards towed equipment, the manufacturer may choose either to apply for EU type-approval or to comply with the relevant national legislation referred to in point (g) of the first subparagraph.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘non-road mobile machinery’ means any self-propelled mobile machinery with a power drive or towed equipment, falling within the scope of Directive 2006/42/EC, that is designed or constructed with the purpose to perform work and with the intent to circulate on public roads, mainly to move from one working place to another;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point c
(c) enginpower drive (internal combustion/hybrid/electric/hybrid- electric),
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point e
(e) number and arrangement of cylinders,deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point f
(f) power difference of no more than 30 % (the highest power being no more than 1,3 times the lowest power),deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point g
(g) cylinder capacity difference of no more than 20 % (the highest figure being no more than 1,2 times the lowest figure),deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point i
(i) steered axles (number and position),deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point j
(j) maximum laden mass differing by no more than 10 %,deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point l
(l) rollover protection structure,deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point m
(m) braked axles (number);deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall not, for the aspects covered by this Regulation, prohibit, restrict or impede the making available on the market, registration, entry into service or circulation on public roads of non-road mobile machinery that complies with this Regulation at the time of placing on the market.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The Commission in empowered to adopt delegated acts in ccordance with Article 47 concerning detailed rules under which Member States cannot refuse the verification, as specified in Article 19, already carried out by the approval authority of another Member State.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 47 concerning detailed rules on the requirements solely for risks related to road circulation set out in paragraph 1 for the following elements:
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) vehicle structure integrity;deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point j
(j) vehicle exterior and accessories in on road position, including working equipment and swinging structure;deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point l
(l) heating systems, defrost and demist;deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point p
(p) masses, including maximum on- roadon-road maximum permissible laden mass;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point q
(q) fuel tanks;deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point w
(w) operator’s manual for road use;deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point y
(y) on-road information, warnings and markings.deleted
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Non-road mobile machinery shall not be made available on the market,, intended for road circulation, shall not be registered or entered into service if registration is not compulsory, unless it is in conformity with this Regulation at the time of placing on the market.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
However, in the case of the first subparagraph, point (b), the EU type- approval and the relevant EU type- approval certificate shall become, for placing on the market, invalid 1824 months after the date of applicability of the new requirements referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b).
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
From [date of entry into force], national authorities shall not refuse to grant EU type-approval or national type-approval for a new type of non-road mobile machinery, or prohibit placing on the market, registration, or entry into service of a new non-road mobile machinery when complying with this Regulation and the delegated and implementing acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation, if a manufacturer so requests.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2023/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2 a (new)
The power of the Commission to adopt delegated acts pursuant to Article 47 shall apply as of [date of entry into force of this regulation.] The Commission shall adopt all the delegated acts referred to in in Article 4 (5), Article 15(2), Article 21(9), Article 22(6) and Article 39 before [24 months from the date of entry into force of this regulation.]
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Within the same context, the healthcare sector should be recognized as a relevant player in reducing the environmental pollution. It would therefore be essential for companies and healthcare professionals and beneficial for patients to establish a proper regulatory framework for using claims relating to biodegradability, sustainability, circularity and origin of the product’s components, both for medicinal products (according to Directive 2001/83) and medical devices (according to Regulations 2017/745).
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 173 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 64
(64) When setting penalties and measures for infringements, the Member States should foresee that, based on the gravity of the infringement, the level of fines should effectively deprive the non- compliant trader from the economic benefit derived from using the misleading or unsubstantiated explicit environmental claim or non-compliant environmental labelling scheme, including in cases of repeated infringements. The measures for infringements foreseen by the Member States should therefore also include confiscation of the relevant product from the trader or revenues gained from the transactions affected by this infringement or a temporary exclusions or prohibitions from placing products or making available services on the Union market. The gravity of the infringement should be the leading criterion for the measures taken by the enforcement authorities. The maximum amount of fines should be dissuasive and set at least at the level of 4% of the trader’s total annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned in case of widespread infringements with a Union dimension that are subject to coordinated investigation and enforcement measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/239488 . _________________ 88 Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (OJ L 345, 27.12.2017, p. 1).
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 177 #

2023/0085(COD)

(67) Where based on the results of the monitoring and evaluation of this Directive the Commission finds it appropriate to propose a review of this Directive, the feasibility and appropriateness of further provisions on mandating the use of common method for substantiation of explicit environmental claims, the extension of prohibition of environmental claims for products containing hazardous substances except where their use is considered essential for the societysafe and improves the sustainability of the product, or further harmonisation as regards requirements on the substantiation of specific environmental claims on environmental aspects or environmental impacts should also be considered.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 187 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive applies to explicit environmental claims made by traders about products or traders in business-to- consumer commercial practices. It does not apply to environmental claims made in business-to-business commercial practices.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 208 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point o a (new)
(o a) Regulations (EU) 2021/2115, 2021/2116, 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and legislative acts based on these Regulations;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 216 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point o b (new)
(o b) Regulation (EU) 2012/1151 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 218 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point o c (new)
(o c) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European parliament and on the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 538 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the requirements for the environmental labelling scheme have been developed by experts that can ensure their scientific robustness and have been submitted for consultation to a heterogeneous group of stakeholders, that apply or are impacted by them or to their representatives, that has reviewed them and ensured their relevance from a societal perspective;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 619 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The verification and certification requirements shall apply to traders that are microenterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC only if they so request. In order to avoid unproportionate costs and burdens for microenterprises and SMEs, Member States shall put in place an alternative ad-hoc verification scheme.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 664 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Member States may set up procedures to prioritise the verification of existing environmental claims made before the entry into force of this Directive and may introduce a transitional period during which existing environmental claims, submitted for verification, can still be used.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 729 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Where, further to the evaluation referred to in the first subparagraph, the competent authorities find that the substantiation and communication of the explicit environmental claim or the environmental labelling scheme does not comply with the requirements laid down in this Directive, they shall notify the trader making the claim about the non- compliance and require that trader to take all appropriate corrective action within 360 days to bring the explicit environmental claim or the environmental labelling scheme into compliance with this Directive or to cease the use of and references to the non-compliant explicit environmental claim. Such action shall be as effective and rapid as possible, while complying with the principle of proportionality and the right to be heard.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 746 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. When determining the type and level of penalties to be imposed in case of infringements, the competent authorities of the Member States shall give due regard to the following: (a) the nature, gravity, extent and duration of the infringement; (b) the intentional or negligent character of the infringement and any action taken by the trader to mitigate or remedy the damage suffered by consumers, where applicable; (c) the financial strength of the natural or legal person held responsible, as indicated for example by the total turnover of the legal person held responsible or the annual income of the natural person held responsible; (d) the economic benefits derived from the infringement by those responsible; (e) any previous infringements by the natural or legal person held responsible; (f) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case; (g) penalties imposed on the trader for the same infringement in other Member States in cross-border cases where information about such penalties is available through the mechanism established by Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, where applicable.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 748 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the nature, gravity, extent and duration of the infringement;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 749 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the intentional or negligent character of the infringement and any action taken by the trader to mitigate or remedy the damage suffered by consumers, where applicable;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 751 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the financial strength of the natural or legal person held responsible, as indicated for example by the total turnover of the legal person held responsible or the annual income of the natural person held responsible;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 752 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the economic benefits derived from the infringement by those responsible;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 754 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) any previous infringements by the natural or legal person held responsible;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 757 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) penalties imposed on the trader for the same infringement in other Member States in cross-border cases where information about such penalties is available through the mechanism established by Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, where applicable.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 765 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide that penalties and measures for infringements of this Directive shall include: (a) fines which effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements; (b) confiscation of revenues gained by the trader from a transaction with the relevant products concerned; (c) temporary exclusion for a maximum period of 12 months from public procurement processes and from access to public funding, including tendering procedures, grants and concessions.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 766 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) fines which effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements;deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 768 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) confiscation of revenues gained by the trader from a transaction with the relevant products concerndeleted;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 770 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) temporary exclusion for a maximum period of 12 months from public procurement processes and from access to public funding, including tendering procedures, grants and concessions.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 771 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of point (a), Member States shall ensure that when penalties are to be imposed in accordance with Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394115 , the maximum amount of such fines being at least at 4 % of the trader’s annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned. _________________ 115 OJ L 345, 27.12.2017, p. 1.deleted
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 786 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall provide the information referred to in paragraph 1 to the Commission on an biannual basis.
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 795 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) facilitating transition towards toxic free environment by considering introducing, on the basis of an impact assessment, a prohibition of environmental claims for products containing hazardous substances except where their use is considered essential for the society in line with the criteria to be developed by the Commisssafe and improves the sustainability of the product, in compliance with the relevant Union and national legislations;
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 816 #

2023/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those measures from [OP please insert the date = 2436 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive].
2023/11/14
Committee: ENVIIMCO
Amendment 72 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In order to reduce premature (3) disposal of viable goods purchased by consumers and to encourage consumers to use their goods longer, it is necessary to set out rules on repair of such goods. Repair should not only result in more sustainable consumption, since it is likely to generate less waste caused by discarded goods, less demand for resources, including energy, caused by the process of manufacturing and sale of new goods replacing defective goods, as well as less greenhouse gas emissions, but should also promote the creation of non-relocatable jobs. This Directive promotes sustainable consumption in view of achieving benefits for the environment while also producing benefits for consumers by avoiding costs associated with new purchases in the short term. To help consumers make sustainable choices, the cost of repairing a product should remain competitive and encourage consumers to repair rather than discard.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The consumer’s free choice to decide by whom to have its goods repaired should be facilitated by requesting the European Repair Information Form not only from the producer, but also from the seller of the goods concerned or from independent repairers, where applicable. Repairers should provide the European Repair Information FormAlthough consumers must be informed that a European Repair Information Form exists, repairers should provide it only where the consumer requests that form and the repairer intends to provide the repair service or it is obliged to repair. A consumer may also choose not to request the European Repair Information Form and to conclude a contract for the provision of repair services with a repairer pursuant to pre-contractual information provided by other means in accordance with Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and the Council.15 __________________ 15 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64–88).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Producers may fulfil their obligation to repair by sub-contracting repair, for instance, if the producer does not have the repair infrastructure or if repair can be carried out by a repairer located closer to the consumer, among othersparticularly where the producer is established outside the Union. To this end, they should provide the consumer with a list of verified repairers.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The requirements laid down in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Regulation [on the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products] or implementing measures adopted pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council16 , according to which producers should provide access to spare parts, repair and maintenance information or any repair related software tools, firmware or similar auxiliary means, apply. Those requirements ensure the technical feasibility of repair, not only by the producer, but also by other repairers. As a consequence, the consumer can select a repairer of its choice. In addition to these measures, independent repairers should be granted access to spare parts and related information on a non- discriminatory basis and at a reasonable cost, for a defined period of time. __________________ 16 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10–35).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The requirements laid down in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Regulation [on the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products] or implementing measures adopted pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council16, according to which producers should provide access, at a reasonable cost and in a non- discriminatory manner for a period equivalent to at least the expected lifespan of the product, to spare parts, repair and maintenance information or any repair related software tools, firmware or similar auxiliary means, apply. Those requirements ensure the technical feasibility of repair, not only by the producer, but also by other repairers. As a consequence, the consumer can select a repairer of its choice. __________________ 16 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10–35).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 140 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Member States should ensure that consumers have easy access to the online platform allowing them to find suitable repair services for their defective goods. The online platform should also be accessible to vulnerable consumers, including persons with disabilities, in accordance with applicable Union law relating to accessibility. To this end, Member States should take steps to inform consumers of the existence of the online platform, for example through communication campaigns. The economic operators concerned should also take measures to inform consumers of the existence of the online platform, for example by displaying a link to the platform on their websites or in shops in general and when purchasing in particular.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The search function based on products may refer to the product type or brand. Since repairers cannot know the specific defect before a request to repair has been made, it is sufficient that they provide on the online platform generic information on key elements of repair services to enable consumers to decide whether to repair the good in question, in particular the average time to complete repair, the availability of temporary replacement goods, the place where the consumer hands over the goods for repair, the possibility of replacing the product under repair during the repair period and the availability of ancillary services. Repairers should be encouraged to regularly update their information on the online platform. In order to build consumer confidence in the repair services available on the online platform, repairers should be able to demonstrate their adherence to certain repair standards.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) The Commission should enable the development of a voluntary European quality standard for repair services, for instance by encouraging and facilitating voluntary cooperation on a standard between businesses, public authorities and other stakeholders or by issuing a standardisation request to the European standardisation organisations, including organisations representing SMEs and their standardisation organisations. A European standard for repair services could boost consumer trust in repair services across the Union. Such standard could include aspects influencing consumer decisions on repair, such as the time to complete repair, the availability of temporary replacement goods, quality assurances such as a commercial guarantee on repair, and the availability of ancillary services such as removal, installation and transportation offered by repairers.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 b (new)
(28b) In order to encourage repair and compensate for the absence of the product during the repair period, the economic operator performing, or delegating, a repair service, should offer the consumer a new or refurbished replacement free of charge, where possible.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Producers shall provide to the repairers all available information necessary to complete the European Repair Information Form.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 250 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where the producer obliged to repair pursuant to paragraph 1 is established outside the Union, its authorised representative in the Union shall perform the obligation of the producer. Where the producer has no authorised representative in the Union, the importer of the good concerned shall perform the obligation of the producer. Where there is no importer, the distributor of the good concerned shall perform the obligation of the producer.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 258 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Producers shall ensure that independent repairers have access to spare parts andfor a minimum of 5 years from the placing on the market of the last unit of product, at a reasonable price, on a non- discriminatory basis and with short notice, as well as to repair-related information and tools in accordance with the Union legal acts listed in Annex II.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 259 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Producers shall ensure that independent repairers have access to spare parts and repair-related information and tools in accordance with the Union legal acts listed in Annex II, at a reasonable cost and in a non- discriminatory manner for a period equivalent to at least the expected lifespan of the product, to spare parts, repair-related information and tools.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Registration on the online platform for repairers, as well as for sellers of goods subject to refurbishment and for purchasers of defective goods for refurbishment, shall be voluntary. Member States shall determine the access to the platform in accordance with Union law. The use of the online platform shall be free of charge for consumers and for independent repairers legally framed as SMEs in accordance to Recommendation 2003/361/EC.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8a Micro and small and medium enterprises Member States shall take the appropriate measures to support micro and small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC in applying the requirements laid down by this Directive. Such measures shall include at least: (a) guidelines to comply with requirements laid down in this Directive; (b) tailor-made training courses for entrepreneurs and their staff.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a National measures to promote repair In compliance with State aid rules, Member States shall take the appropriate measures, including those of fiscal nature, to promote the competitiveness of repair services.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas consumers arseem to be ready to change their purchasing patterns for sustainable options but can be misled by greenwashing practicewhen duly informed about sustainability and origin of the products;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 18 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas supporting a vibrant and dynamic textile sector is strategic for the value chains and the competitiveness of the internal market;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 21 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the long tradition and experience of European textile companies has a priceless value for the European historical heritage;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for stricter customs controls to avoid the import of counterfeit and unsafe textile products or goods without the specific requirements to be sold in the internal market; calls for the implementation of a trusted-flagger alert and notification mechanism and of an appropriate European redress mechanism for consumers affected by misleading labels and textiles that do not comply with Union law;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the introduction of the digital product passport in the proposal for a regulation on ecodesign requirements for sustainable products; believes that in order to be relevant this passport needs to be available on the product itself and be easy to read; favours open and trustworthy data ensuring traceability down to factory level; emphasises that any action that could increase red tape for producers should be avoided and calls for stronger support for SMEs in this sector;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages initiatives to help consumers switch to more sustainable consumption patterns by providing quality products at an affordable price and reducing waste, without affecting competitiveness and offering more choices to the consumers;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that textile producers and brands should be drivers of sustainability by being transparent in their practices and respecting human rights and the environment; believes that these goals could be also achieved supporting the value chain, promoting reshoring in EU of delocalized productions, lowering burdens, promoting the textile value chain with incentives and creating a clear and efficient legal framework for companies and customers;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that some fast fashion companies located outside the EU contribute to puts enormous stress on suppliers and their workforce through unfair trading practices;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for mandatorytransparent criteria onfor a responsible consumption to applyied to public procurement, avoiding fragmentation of the internal market;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls the need to support the EU textile value chain, which actively contribute to the EU competitiveness, while at the same time defending it from external unfair practices, which are also distortive of the internal market;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 25 #

2022/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that in order to strengthen the single market, it is necessary to carry out a digital transformation that increases the availability of online public services; recalls that eGovernment facilitates relationships with citizens, businesses, employees and governments, and calls for the establishment of a European digital identity;
2022/11/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2022/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Firmly bBelieves that the further development of digital public services can significantly contribute to the reduction of administrative barriers for entrepreneurs, especially micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs); calls on Member States to redouble their efforts to further digitalise public services without that meaning that citizens of Member States who so wish cannot avail themselves of those services in a traditional and non- digitalised manner; stresses the importance of not sacrificing public services that are accessible in a non- computerised manner, but, rather, of allowing easy and rapid access to such public services;
2022/11/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2022/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the provision of digital public services implies the use of personal data, and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to pay special attention to the protection of citizens’ personal data, including in connection with data transfer agreements with third countries; calls on the Commission not to compromise the high level of personal-data protection to which Member State citizens are entitled; calls on the Commission to foster the development of sovereign European digital infrastructure guaranteeing that the rights of European users, and the security of their data, will be protected;
2022/11/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2022/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that e-health has untapped potential, and therefore welcomes the Commission’s intention to create a European health data space; emphasises, furthermore, that e-medical records are extremely useful for stimulating cross-border research and providing cross-border healthcare;deleted
2022/11/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2022/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative to create European data spaces in various sectors, including health, justice and public procurement; considers it crucial for these data spaces to be interoperable so that consumers and entrepreneurs, especially SMEs, can achieve their full potential; points out that the interoperability of data spaces should be the starting point for all future digitalisation strategies; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal as soon as possible that will ensure the interoperability of data spaces in the European single market;
2022/11/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the video games industry employed 86 953 people in 2019, of whom around 20% were women; 3a; _________________ 3a ISFE, Europe’s Video Games Industry, ISFE-EGDF Key Facts, 2021.
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 40 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas online video games present, by their very nature, important levels of criticalities especially when the gaming experience is compared to most traditional physical channels;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas spending excessive amounts of time playing online video games, in the absence of appropriate safeguards, can create addictions and lead to ‘gaming disorder’, and can also lead to consumer-protection related issues as well as mechanisms that can be reminiscent of electronic forms of gambling, in particular with regard to minors;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas monetized video games may have very few consumer protection guarantees, which could pose financial risks for users and, in the case of minors, parents and those legally responsible for their actions;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the control and verification tools set up for accessing online video games may lack efficiency, particularly when it comes to verifying with absolute certainty players’ age;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas, with regard to the psychosocial effects of certain reward mechanisms, children are more at risk to develop habits in response to certain stimuli;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the European video games industry represented a market size of EUR 23.3 billion in 2020 and is still growing8a; whereas, since 2015, digital revenues have increased threefold and account for more than half of European market revenues; _________________ 8a ISFE, Europe’s Video Games Industry, ISFE-EGDF Key Facts, 2021
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the industry has historically generated revenue from the sale of video games but has been rapidly shifting to purely digital services sold through online storefronts, leading the grounds for new and complex business models; whereas one of the currently predominant business models is represented by in-game purchases that unlock digital content in the video game environment;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Kb. whereas the video games industry represents an important and rapidly growing segment of the creativity sector in Europe, which has historically lagged behind in the emergence of 'European champions' within the global digital sector;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the measures taken to better protect consumers; notes, however, the need for a single, coordinated approach between Member States in order to avoid fragmentation of the single market and to protect European consumers;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the development and implementation of parental-control tools that help to filter content and video games by age, monitor time spent playing games, disable or limit online spending and restrict communications with others or the viewing of content created by other players; notes, however, that parents may find it difficult to use such tools, which reduces their effectiveness; calls for mechanisms to be put in place to exercise stricter parental control over the amount of time and money children spend on games, among other thingsstresses that instructions for effective use of parental control should be made user-friendly, accessible and clear;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that some video games offer their users the possibility to pay, sometimes even with real money, in order to obtain rewards through loot boxesbuy in-game currencies and to obtain randomized rewards through loot boxes; stresses that the use of in-game currencies constitutes an additional transaction layer that abstracts the real-world cost of the virtual item;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Observes that generally the ownership of in-game currencies does not guarantee the right of refund nor the right of withdrawal for consumers, notably given the complicated licensing agreements through which video games companies often grant themselves the power to unilaterally change contractual clauses;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that consumers should have all the necessary information about an online video game before starting to play it, as well as during the game, in terms of the multiple options for possible purchases while playing and other information that may be considered to be of interest; observes in particular that clear information shall be provided to consumers in advertising materials on what to expect from in-game purchases and how they affect gameplay;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Points out that in cases where algorithmic decision-making is employed in video games, particularly when it aims at influencing user behaviour, consumers shall be explicitly informed;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that, when adopting regulatory action, the Commission shall prioritize banning misleading designs, increasing minors protection and ensuring transactional transparency for in-game purchasing systems;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Stresses that regulatory action shall provide a good balance between consumer protection and the development of strategic business models; underlines that although consumer protection is a shared competence, the video games sector requires cross-border protection because of its intrinsic nature;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls that children are less able to disentangle costs when presented with virtual currencies and may have problems understanding and taking probabilities into account particularly when it comes to randomized rewards;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the importance of creating enforceable accessibility standards for consumers affected by disabilities, in particular when minors;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 250 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to take advantage of the fitness check to be conducted on digital fairness, as part of the New Consumer Agenda2020, to assess key concepts relevant for the protection of consumer in online video games as vulnerability, deceptive design and monetisation techniques;
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the new Industrial Strategy was updated to reflect the lessons learned from COVID-19, and that this strategy will be key toshould go further in enhancing EU competitiveness and overcoming future challenges, such as Union independence for the most strategic economic sectors; recalls that a strong governance system, European preference and market surveillance are essential in order to relaunch the single market; calls on the Commission to focus on ensuring that the industrial strategy helps remove single market barriers and avoid further fragmentation;
2022/04/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the need to strengthen the competitiveness of SMEs and industry by addressing supply risks, dependencies, disruptions and vulnerabilities, especially in the green and digital economies; stresses that effective public procurement will lead to more jobs, growth and innovative investments; recalls that the selection and award criteria should not result in an unreasonable administrative burden, particularly for European micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises;
2022/04/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the need to strengthen the competitiveness of SMEs and industry by addressing supply risks, dependencies, disruptions and vulnerabilities, especially in the green and digital economies; stresses that public procurement can play an active role in achieving the New Industrial Strategy objectives, such as the emergence of competitive European businesses; stresses that effective public procurement will lead to more jobs, growth and innovative investments;
2022/04/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the need to enhance European strategic autonomy by investing in skills, digital infrastructures, particularly for the storage and processing of European user data, and key technologies such as AI, cybersecurity, 5G and 6G, microprocessors and semiconductors, high-performance computing and quantum technologies;
2022/04/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that developing these key sectors requires that a European preference system be established for local or European production in public procurement contracts in Europe;
2022/04/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) While the Union has competence to adopt measures on family law with cross- border implications such as rules on international jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition of parenthood between Member States, to date the Union has not adopted provisions in those areas as regards parenthood. The Member States’ provisions currently applicable in these areas differ. , and, although the Regulation does not directly affect substantive national law, it nevertheless has a considerable bearing thereon. In order to uphold the different legal and constitutional traditions of the Member States and the public policy limits thereof, states which, upon entry into force of this Regulation, already have legislation in place to ensure full respect for children’s rights and the recognition of parenthood status in specific cases of children born abroad, by virtue of instruments other than the recognition of court decisions and authentic instruments with binding legal effect originating in other Member States, must remain free to disregard the rules on recognition. To that end, the competent authority of the Member State should submit, within six months of entry into force of this Regulation, a communication to the Commission setting out how its national legislation ensures that the principles of non-discrimination and the protection of the best interests of the child are upheld.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In 2020 the Commission announced measures47 to ensure that the parenthood established in a Member State would be recognised in all other Member States. This initiative was included in the 2020 EU LGBTIQ Equality Strategy48 and the 2021 EU Strategy on the rights of the child49 as a key action to support equality and the rights of children. The European Parliament welcomed the Commission’s initiative in its 2021 Resolution on LGBTIQ rights in the EU50 and in its 2022 Resolution on the protection of the rights of the child in civil, administrative and family law proceedings51. _________________ 47 State of the Union Address by Commission President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary, 20 September 2020. 48 Union of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025, COM(2020) 698 final. 49 EU Strategy on the rights of the child, COM(2021) 142 final. 50 European Parliament resolution of 14 September 2021 on LGBTIQ rights in the EU (2021/2679(RSP)). 51 European Parliament resolution of 5 April 2022 on the protection of the rights of the child in civil, administrative and family law proceedings (2021/2060(INI)).deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Under Article 21 TFEU and secondary legislation relating thereto as interpreted by the Court of Justice, the respect of a Member State’s national identity under Article 4(2) TEU and a Member State’s public policy cannot serve as justification to refuse to recognise a parent-child relationship between children and their same-sex parents for the purposes of exercising the rights that a child derives from Union law. In addition, for the purposes of exercising such rights, proof of parenthood can be presented by any means52. Therefore, a Member State is not entitled to require that a person presents either the attestations provided for in this Regulation accompanying a court decision or an authentic instrument on parenthood, or the European Certificate of Parenthood created by this Regulation, where the person invokes, in the context of the exercise of the right to free movement, rights that a child derives from Union law. This should not, however, prevent a person from choosing to present in such cases also the relevant attestation or the European Certificate of Parenthood provided for in this Regulation. To ensure that Union citizens and their family members are informed that the rights that a child derives from Union law are not affected by this Regulation, the forms of the attestations and of the European Certificate of Parenthood annexed to this Regulation should include a statement specifying that the relevant attestation or the European Certificate of Parenthood do not affect the rights that a child derives from Union law, in particular the rights that a child enjoys under Union law on free movement, and that, for the exercise of such rights, proof of the parent-child relationship can be presented by any means. _________________ 52 Judgments of the Court of Justice of 25 July 2002, C-459/99, MRAX, ECLI:EU:C:2002:461, paragraphs 61 and 62, and of 17 February 2005, C- 215/03, Oulane, ECLI:EU:C:2005:95, paragraphs 23 to 26.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Pursuant to Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’), equality and non-discrimination are amongst the values on which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States. Article 21 of the Charter prohibits discrimination on grounds of, amongst others, birth. Article 3 TEU and Article 24 of the Charter provide for the protection of the rights of the child, and Article 7 of the Charter provides for everyone’s right to respect for their private and family life. Article 3 of the Charter, however, affirms the right to the integrity of the person and prohibits making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 96 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In conformity with the provisions of international conventions and Union law, this Regulation should ensure that children enjoy their rights and maintain their legal status in cross-border situations without discrimination. To that effect, and in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice, including on mutual trust between Member States, and of the European Court on Human Rights, this Regulation should cover the recognition in a Member State of the parenthood established in another Member State irrespective of how the child was conceived or born and irrespective of the child’s type of family, and including domestic adoption. Therefore, subject to the application of the rules on applicable law of this Regulation, this Regulation should cover the recognition in a Member State of the parenthood established in another Member State of a child with same-sex parents. This Regulation should also cover the recognition in a Member State of the parenthood of a child adopted domestically in another Member State under the rules governing domestic adoption in that Member State, without prejudice to the public policy restrictions of the Member States.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) To achieve its aims, it is necessary and appropriate for this Regulation to bring together common rules on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition or, as the case may be, acceptance of court decisions and authentic instruments on parenthood as well as rules on the creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood in a Union legal instrument which is binding and directly applicable.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 108 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) For the purposes of this Regulation, parenthood, also referred to as filiation, may be biologic, genetic, by adoption or by operation of law. AlsoSubject to the limits on public order imposed by national laws, for the purposes of this Regulation, parenthood should mean the parent-child relationship established in law, and should cover the legal status of being the child of a particular parent or parents. This Regulation should cover the parenthood established in a Member State of both minors and adults, including a deceased child and a child not yet born, whether to a single parent, a de facto couple, a married couple or a couple in a relationship which, under the law applicable to such relationship, has comparable effects, such as a registered partnership. This Regulation should apply regardless of the nationality of the child whose parenthood is to be established, and regardless of the nationality of the parents of the child. The term ‘parent’ in this Regulation should be understood, as applicable, as referring to the legal parent, the intended parent, the person who claims to be a parent or the person in respect of whom the child claims parenthood.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 111 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) Parent-child relationships that arise after conception and gestation are carried out on another’s behalf should not be covered by the scope of this Regulation. Gestation on another’s behalf should be understood as a form of assisted procreation whereby a woman enters into a contractual obligation to carry a pregnancy to term on behalf of third parties, intended parents or clients, either free of charge or for a fee. Whether remunerated or not, gestation on another’s behalf, or ‘surrogacy’, should be prohibited in all Member States, as it violates the dignity of the woman and the unborn child, in contravention of Article 3 of the Charter, in particular the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 114 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) This Regulation should not apply to the establishment of parenthood in a Member State in a domestic situation with no cross-border elements. This Regulation should not therefore include provisions on jurisdiction or applicable law for the establishment of parenthood in domestic cases, such as the parenthood of a child further to a domestic adoption in a Member State. However, in order to safeguard children’s rights without discrimination in cross-border situations as laid down in the Charter, in application of the principle of mutual trust between Member States as confirmed by the Court of Justice, the provisions of this Regulation on the recognition or, as the case may be, acceptance of court decisions and authentic instruments on parenthood should also apply to the recognition of parenthood established in a Member State in domestic situations, such as the parenthood established in a Member State further to a domestic adoption in that Member State. The provisions of this Regulation concerning the relevant attestation and the European Certificate of Parenthood should therefore also apply as regards the parenthood established in a Member State in domestic situations, such as further to a domestic adoption in a Member State.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 117 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) For the purposes of this Regulation, a domestic adoption in a Member State is that in which the child and the adoptive parent or parents have their habitual residence in the same Member State and where the adoption creates a permanent parent-child relationship. In order to take account of the different legal traditions of the Member States, this Regulation should cover domestic adoption in a Member State where the adoption results in the termination of the legal relationship between the child and the family of origin (full adoption) as well as domestic adoption in a Member State which does not result in the termination of the legal relationship between the child and the family of origin (simple adoption).deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 126 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The requirements for the recording of parenthood in a register should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation. It should therefore be the law of the Member State in which the register is kept that should determine under what legal conditions and how the recording must be carried out, and which authorities are in charge of checking that all requirements are met and that the documentation presented or established is sufficient or contains the necessary information. In order to avoid duplication of documents, the national registration authorities should accept the documents drawn up in another Member State by the competent authorities whose circulation is provided for by this Regulation. In particular, the European Certificate of Parenthood issued under this Regulation should constitute a valid document for the recording of parenthood in a register of a Member State. As the procedure for the issuance of the European Certificate of Parenthood and its contents and effects should be uniform in all Member States as set out in this Regulation, and the European Certificate of Parenthood should be issued in conformity with the rules on jurisdiction and applicable law laid down in this Regulation, the authorities involved in the registration should not require that the European Certificate of Parenthood be first transposed into a national document on parenthood. This should not preclude the authorities involved in the registration from confirming the conditions necessary to establish the authenticity of the European Certificate of Parenthood or from asking the person applying for registration to provide such additional information as required under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept, provided that information is not already included in the European Certificate of Parenthood. The competent authority may indicate to the person applying for registration how the missing information can be provided. The effects of recording the parenthood in a register (for example, depending on the national law, whether registration establishes parenthood or only provides evidence of the parenthood already established) should also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation and be determined by the law of the Member State in which the register is kept.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) In the interests of procedural economy and procedural efficiency, if the outcome of proceedings before a court of a Member State not having jurisdiction under this Regulation depends on the determination of an incidental question falling within the scope of this Regulation, the courts of that Member State should not be prevented by this Regulation from determining that question. Therefore, if the object of the proceedings is, for instance, a succession dispute in which the parent- child relationship between the deceased and the child must be established for the purposes of those proceedings, the Member State having jurisdiction for the succession dispute should be allowed to determine that question for the pending proceedings, regardless of whether it has jurisdiction for parenthood matters under this Regulation. Any such determination should be made in accordance with the applicable law designated by this Regulation, and should only produce effects in the proceedings for which it was made and constitute evidence in related pending proceedings.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 171 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Any of the laws designated as applicable by this Regulation should apply even if it is not the law of a Member State.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 204 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) In order to take into account the different systems of dealing with parenthood in the Member States, this Regulation should guarantee the acceptance in all Member States of authentic instruments which have no binding legal effect in the Member State of origin but which have evidentiary effects in that Member State. Such authentic instruments can have evidentiary effects as regards parenthood already established or as regards other facts. Depending on the national law, authentic instruments providing evidence of parenthood already established can be, for example, a birth certificate, a parenthood certificate or an extract from the civil register on birth. Authentic instruments providing evidence of other facts can be, for example, a notarial or administrative document recording an acknowledgment of paternity, a notarial or administrative document recording the consent of a mother or of a child to the establishment of parenthood, a notarial or administrative document recording the consent of a spouse to the use of assisted reproductive technology, without prejudice to the exclusion from the scope of this Regulation of gestation on another’s behalf, or a notarial or administrative document recording a possession of state.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 206 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
(69) Authentic instruments which have no binding legal effect in the Member State of origin but which have evidentiary effects in that Member State should have the same evidentiary effects in another Member State as they have in the Member State of origin, or the most comparable effects. When determining the evidentiary effects of such an authentic instrument in another Member State or the most comparable effects, reference should be made to the nature and the scope of the evidentiary effects of the authentic instrument in the Member State of origin. The evidentiary effects which such an authentic instrument should have in another Member State will therefore depend on the law of the Member State of origin.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 222 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 75
(75) Considerations of public interest should allow Member State courts or other competent authorities to refuse, in exceptional circumstances, to recognise or, as the case may be, accept a court decision or authentic instrument on the parenthood established in another Member State where, in a given case, such recognition or acceptance would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy (ordre public) of the Member State concerned. However, the courts or other competent authorities should not be able to refuse to recognise or, as the case may be, accept a court decision or an authentic instrument issued in another Member State when doing so would be contrary to the Charter and, in particular, Article 21 thereof, which prohibits discrimination, and Article 3 thereof on the right to the integrity of the person, which prohibits making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 226 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76
(76) In order for the recognition of the parenthood established in a Member State to be settled speedily, smoothly and efficiently, children or their parent(s) should be able to demonstrate easily the children’s status in another Member State. To enable them to do so, this Regulation should provide for the creation of a uniform certificate, the European Certificate of Parenthood, to be issued for use in another Member State. In order to respect the principle of subsidiarity, the European Certificate of Parenthood should not take the place of internal documents which may exist for similar purposes in the Member States.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 230 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 77
(77) The authority that issues the European Certificate of Parenthood should have regard to the formalities required for the registration of parenthood in the Member State in which the register is kept. For that purpose, this Regulation should provide for an exchange of information on such formalities between the Member States.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 232 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
(78) The use of the European Certificate of Parenthood should not be mandatory. This means that persons entitled to apply for a European Certificate of Parenthood, namely the child or a legal representative, should be under no obligation to do so and should be free to present the other instruments available under this Regulation (a court decision or an authentic instrument) when requesting recognition in another Member State. However, no authority or person presented with a European Certificate of Parenthood issued in another Member State should be entitled to request that a court decision or an authentic instrument be presented instead of the European Certificate of Parenthood.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 237 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 79
(79) The European Certificate of Parenthood should be issued in the Member State in which parenthood was established and whose courts have jurisdiction under this Regulation. It should be for each Member State to determine in its internal legislation which authorities are to have competence to issue the European Certificate of Parenthood, whether they be courts or other authorities with competence in matters of parenthood, such as, for example, administrative authorities, notaries or registrars. The Member States should communicate to the Commission the relevant information concerning the authorities empowered under national law to issue the European Certificate of Parenthood in order for that information to be made publicly available.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 238 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 80
(80) Whilst the contents and the effects of national authentic instrument providing evidence of parenthood (such as a birth certificate or a parenthood certificate) vary depending on the Member State of origin, the European Certificate of Parenthood should have the same contents and produce the same effects in all Member States. It should have evidentiary effects and should be presumed to demonstrate accurately elements which have been established under the law applicable to the establishment of parenthood designated by this Regulation. The evidentiary effects of the European Certificate of Parenthood should not extend to elements which are not governed by this Regulation, such as the civil status of the parents of the child whose parenthood is concerned. Whilst the language of a national authentic instrument providing evidence of parenthood is issued in the language of the Member State of origin, the European Certificate of Parenthood form annexed to this Regulation is available in all Union languages.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 243 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
(81) The court or other competent authority should issue the European Certificate of Parenthood upon request. The original of the European Certificate of Parenthood should remain with the issuing authority, which should issue one or more certified copies of the European Certificate of Parenthood to the applicant or a legal representative. Given the stability of parenthood status in the vast majority of cases, the validity of the copies of the European Certificate of Parenthood should not be limited in time, without prejudice to the possibility to rectify, modify, suspend or withdraw the European Certificate of Parenthood as necessary. This Regulation should provide for redress against decisions of the issuing authority, including decisions to refuse to issue a European Certificate of Parenthood. Where the European Certificate of Parenthood is rectified, modified, suspended or withdrawn, the issuing authority should inform the persons to whom certified copies have been issued so as to avoid a wrongful use of such copies.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 248 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 83
(83) The European electronic access point should allow natural persons or their legal representatives to launch a request for a European Certificate of Parenthood and to receive and send that Certificate electronically. It should also allow them to communicate electronically with Member State courts or other competent authorities in proceedings for a decision that there are no grounds for the refusal of recognition of a court decision or an authentic instrument on parenthood, or proceedings for the refusal of recognition of a court decision or an authentic instrument on parenthood. Member State courts or other competent authorities should communicate with citizens through the European electronic access point only where the citizen has given prior express consent to the use of this means of communication.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 86
(86) In order to ensure that the attestations provided for in Chapters IV and V and the European Certificate of Parenthood provided for in Chapter VI of this Regulation are kept up to date, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend Annexes I to V to this Regulation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making60. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the Council receives all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 60 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making (OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1).
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 256 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87
(87) Respect for international commitments entered into by the Member States means that this Regulation should not affect the application of international conventions to which one or more Member States are party at the time when this Regulation is adopted. To make the rules more accessible, the Commission should publish the list of the relevant conventions in the European e-Justice Portal on the basis of the information supplied by the Member States. Consistency with the general objectives of this Regulation requires, however, that this Regulation take precedence, as between Member States, over conventions concluded exclusively between two or more Member States in so far as such conventions concern matters governed by this Regulation.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 260 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 90
(90) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter. In particular, this Regulation seeks to promote the application of Article 7 on everyone’s right to respect for their private and family life, Article 21 prohibiting discrimination, Article 3 on the right to the integrity of the person, and Article 24 on the protection of the rights of the child.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 261 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 92
(92) In applying this Regulation, Member State courts or other competent authorities may need to process personal data for the purposes of the establishment of parenthood in cross-border situations and of the recognition of parenthood between Member States. This entails the processing of personal data for the establishment of parenthood in a cross- border situation, the issuance of the attestations accompanying court decisions or authentic instruments, the issuance of a European Certificate of Parenthood, the presentation of documents for the recognition of parenthood, the obtaining of a decision that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition of parenthood, or the application for refusal of recognition of parenthood. Personal data processed by Member State courts or other competent authorities pursuant to this Regulation are contained in the documents handled by Member State courts or other competent authorities for the above purposes. Personal data processed will in particular concern children, their parents and their legal representatives. The personal data handled by Member State courts or other competent authorities should be processed in accordance with applicable data protection legislation, in particular the GDPR. In addition, in applying this Regulation, the Commission may need to process personal data in connection with the electronic communication between natural persons or their legal representatives and Member State courts or other competent authorities to request, receive and send a European Certificate of Parenthood, or in proceedings concerning the recognition or the refusal of recognition of parenthood, through the European electronic access point in the context of the decentralised IT system. The personal data handled by the Commission should be processed in accordance with the EUDPR.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 266 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 95
(95) For the purposes of the establishment of parenthood in a cross- border situation, the issuance of the attestations accompanying court decisions or authentic instruments, the issuance of a European Certificate of Parenthood, the presentation of documents for the recognition of parenthood, the obtaining of a decision that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition of parenthood, or the application for refusal of recognition of parenthood, Member State courts or other competent authorities empowered by the Member States to apply this Regulation should be regarded as controllers within the meaning of Article 4, point 7 of the GDPR. For the purposes of the technical management, development, maintenance, security and support of the European electronic access point, and of the communication between natural persons or their legal representatives and Member State courts or other competent authorities through the European electronic access point and the decentralised IT system, the Commission should be regarded as controller within the meaning of Article 3, point 8 of the EUDPR. Controllers should ensure the security, integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the data processed for the above purposes.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 270 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down common rules on jurisdiction and applicable law for the establishment of parenthood in a Member State in cross-border situations; and common rules for the recognition or, as the case may be, acceptance in a Member State of court decisions on parenthood given, and authentic instruments on parenthood drawn up or registered, in another Member State; and creates a European Certificate of Parenthood.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 283 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) parent-child relationships in which the child was conceived through a surrogate pregnancy, as defined in point 1 a of paragraph 1 of Article 4. Exclusion from the scope of this regulation shall apply in the same manner for cases in which a surrogate pregnancy has been carried out in a Member State or in a third country and then established and recognised in a Member State.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 291 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
1a. 'Surrogate pregnancy' means a form of assisted reproduction in which a woman is contractually obliged to proceed with a pregnancy on behalf of third parties, intending or commissioning parents, either free of charge or for a consideration.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 319 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The non-definitive determination of an incidental question pursuant to paragraph 1 shall produce effects only in the proceedings for which that determination was made and may be used as evidence in pending related actions.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 324 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16
16 Any law designated as applicable by this Regulation shall be applied whether Any law designated as applicable by this Regulation shall be applied whetherArticle 16 deleted or not it is the law of a Member State.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 336 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Where parenthood has been definitively established in a Member State pursuant to this Regulation, a subsequent change of the applicable law shall not affect the parenthood already established.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 349 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall be applied by the courts and other competent authorities of the Member States in observance of the fundamental rights and principles laid down in the Charter, in particular Article 21 thereof on the right to non- discrimination and Article 3 on the right to the integrity of the person.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 354 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. AWithin the limits provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 31 and cases where Article 41 a applies, a court decision on parenthood given in a Member State shall be recognised in all other Member States without any special procedure being required.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 366 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. If the documents specified in Article 26(1) are not produced, the court or other competent authority before which a court decision given in another Member State is invoked may specify a time for its production, accept equivalent documents or, if it considers that it has sufficient information before it, dispense with its production.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 372 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
4. No challenge shall lie against the issuance ofThe law of the Member State of origin shall apply to the procedure for contesting the attestation.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 387 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Point (a) of paragraph 1 shall be applied by the courts and other competent authorities of the Member States in observance of the fundamental rights and principles laid down in the Charter, in particular Article 21 thereof on the right to non-discrimination and Article 3 on the right to the integrity of the person.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 399 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) it considers it unreasonable to require the applicant to provide them.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 410 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
AWithin the limits provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 39 and cases where Article 41 a applies, authentic instruments establishing parenthood with binding legal effect in the Member State of origin shall be recognised in other Member States without any special procedure being required. Sections 1 and 2 of this Chapter shall apply accordingly, unless otherwise provided for in this Section.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 432 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. Point (a) of paragraph 1 shall be applied by the courts and other competent authorities of the Member States in observance of the fundamental rights and principles laid down in the Charter, in particular Article 21 thereof on the right to non-discrimination and Article 3 on the right to the integrity of the person.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 438 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40
40 The jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of origin establishing parenthood may not be reviewed.The test of public policy referred to in point (a) of Article 31(1) may not be applied to the rules relating to jurisdiction set out in The jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of origin establishing parenthood may not be reviewed. The test of public policy referred to in point (a) of Article 31(1) may not be applied to the rules relating to jurisdiction set out inArticle 40 deleted Articles 6 to 9.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 442 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41
41 Under no circumstances may a court decision given in another Member State, or an authentic instrument establishing parenthood with binding legal effect in the Member State of origin, be reviewed Under no circumstances may a court decision given in another Member State, or an authentic instrument establishing parenthood with binding legal effect in the Member State of origin, be reviewArticle 41 deleted as to their substance.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 446 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 a (new)
Article 41 a Disapplication Member States that, on the date of entry into force of this regulation, have established suitable legislation to ensure that children's rights are fully upheld and that the parent-child relationship of children born abroad is recognised by means of instruments other than that recognising judicial decisions or binding public decisions made in other Member States may disapply the recognition rules laid down in this chapter. To that end, the Member State's competent public authority shall issue a communication to the Commission within six months of the regulation's entry into force explaining how the relevant national legislation ensures that the principles of non-discrimination and of the best interests of the child.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 453 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1
1. An authentic instrument which has no binding legal effect in the Member State of origin shall have the same evidentiary effects in another Member State as it has in the Member State of origin, or the most comparable effects, provided that this is not manifestly contrary to public policy (ordre public) in the Member State where it is presented.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 457 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
2. The public policy (ordre public) referred to in paragraph 1 shall be applied by the courts and other competent authorities of the Member States in observance of the fundamental rights and principles laid down in the Charter, in particular Article 21 thereof on the right to non-discrimination and Article 3 on the right to the integrity of the person.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 462 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46
Creation of a European Certificate of 1. This Regulation creates a European Certificate of Parenthood (‘the Certificate’) which shall be issued for use in another Member State and shall produce the effects listed in Article 53. 2. The use of the Certificate shall not be mandatory. 3. The Certificate shall not take the place of internal documents used for similar purposes in the Member States. However, once issued for use in another Member State, the Certificate shall also produce the effects listed in Article 53 in the Member State whose authorities issued it in accordance with this Chapter.Article 46 deleted Parenthood
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 467 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47
47 The Certificate is for use by a child or a legal representative who, in another Member State, needs to invoke the child’s The Certificate is for use by a child or a legal representative who, in another Member State, needs to invoke the child’sArticle 47 deleted parenthood status.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 471 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48
1. The Certificate shall be issued in the Member State in which parenthood was established and whose courts, as defined in Article 4(4), have jurisdiction under Article 6, Article 7 or Article 9. 2. The issuing authority, as communicated to the Commission pursuant to Article 71, of the Member State referred to in paragraph 1 shall be: (a) a court as defined in Article 4(4); or (b) another authority which, under national law, has competence to deal with parenthood matters.Article 48 deleted Competence to issue the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 473 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49
Application for a Certificate 1. The Certificate shall be issued upon application by the child (‘the applicant’) or, where applicable, a legal representative. 2. For the purposes of submitting an application, the applicant may use the form established in Annex IV. 3. The application shall contain the information listed below, to the extent that such information is within the applicant’s knowledge and is necessary in order to enable the issuing authority to certify the elements which the applicant wants certified, and shall be accompanied by all relevant documents either in the original or by way of copies which satisfy the conditions necessary to establish their authenticity, without prejudice to Article 50(2): (a) details concerning the applicant: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), sex, date and place of birth, nationality (if known), identification number (if applicable), address; (b) if applicable, details concerning the legal representative of the applicant: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), address and representative capacity; (c) details concerning each parent: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), date and place of birth, nationality, identification number (if applicable), address; (d) the place and Member State where the parenthood of the child is registered; (e) the elements on which the applicant founds parenthood, appending the original or a copy of the document(s) establishing parenthood with binding legal effect or providing evidence of the parenthood; (f) the contact details of the Member State’s court that established parenthood, of the competent authority that issued an authentic instrument establishing parenthood with binding legal effect, or of the competent authority that issued an authentic instrument with no binding legal effect in the Member State of origin but with evidentiary effects in that Member State; (g) a declaration stating that, to the applicant’s best knowledge, no dispute is pending relating to the elements to be certified; (h) any other information which the applicant deems useful for the purposes of the issuance of the Certificate.rticle 49 deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 484 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50
1. Upon receipt of the application, the issuing authority shall verify the information and declarations and the documents and other evidence provided by the applicant. It shall carry out the enquiries necessary for that verification of its own motion where this is provided for or authorised by its national law, or shall invite the applicant to provide any further evidence which it deems necessary. 2. Where the applicant has been unable to produce copies of the relevant documents which satisfy the conditions necessary to establish their authenticity, the issuing authority may decide to accept other forms of evidence. 3. Where this is provided for by its national law and subject to the conditions laid down therein, the issuing authority may require that declarations be made on oath or by a statutory declaration in lieu of an oath. 4. For the purposes of this Article, the competent authority of a Member State shall, upon request, provide the issuing authority of another Member State with information held, in particular, in the civil, personal or population registers and other registers recording facts of relevance for the parenthood of the applicant, where that competent authority would be authorised, under national law, to provide another national authority with such information.Article 50 deleted Examination of the application
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 489 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51
1. The issuing authority shall issue the Certificate without delay in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Chapter when the elements to be certified have been established under the law applicable to the establishment of parenthood. It shall use the form in Annex V. The issuing authority shall not issue the Certificate in particular if: (a) the elements to be certified are being challenged; or (b) the Certificate would not be in conformity with a court decision covering the same elements. 2. The fee collected for issuing a Certificate shall not be higher than the fee collected for issuing a certificate under national law providing evidence of the parenthood of the applicant.Article 51 deleted Issuance of the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 496 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52
The Certificate shall contain the following information, as applicable: (a) the name, address and contact details of the Member State’s issuing authority; (b) if different, the name, address and contact details of the Member State’s court that established parenthood, of the competent authority that issued an authentic instrument establishing parenthood with binding legal effect, or of the competent authority that issued an authentic instrument with no binding legal effect in the Member State of origin but with evidentiary effects in that Member State; (c) the reference number of the file; (d) the date and place of issue; (e) the place and Member State where the parenthood of the child is registered; (f) details concerning the applicant: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), sex, date and place of birth, nationality (if known), identification number (if applicable), address; (g) if applicable, details concerning the legal representative of the applicant: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), address and representative capacity; (h) details concerning each parent: surname(s) (if applicable, surname(s) at birth), given name(s), date and place of birth, nationality, identification number (if applicable), address; (i) the elements on the basis of which the issuing authority considers itself competent to issue the Certificate; (j) the law applicable to the establishment of parenthood and the elements on the basis of which that law has been determined; (k) a statement informing Union citizens and their family members that the Certificate does not affect the rights that a child derives from Union law and that, for the exercise of such rights, proof of the parent-child relationship can be presented by any means; (l) signature and/or stamp of the issuing authority.Article 52 deleted Contents of the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 504 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53
1. The Certificate shall produce its effects in all Member States without any special procedure being required. 2. The Certificate shall be presumed to demonstrate accurately elements which have been established under the law applicable to the establishment of parenthood. The person mentioned in the Certificate as the child of a particular parent or parents shall be presumed to have the status mentioned in the Certificate. 3. The Certificate shall constitute a valid document for the recording of parenthood in the relevant register of a Member State, without prejudice to point (i) of Article 3(2).Article 53 deleted Effects of the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 513 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54
1. The issuing authority shall keep the original of the Certificate and shall issue one or more certified copies to the applicant or a legal representative. 2. The issuing authority shall, for the purposes of Articles 55(3) and 57(2), keep a list of persons to whom certified copies have been issued pursuant to paragraph 1.Article 54 deleted Certified copies of the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 515 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55
Rectification, modification or withdrawal 1. The issuing authority shall, at the request of any person demonstrating a legitimate interest or of its own motion, rectify the Certificate in the event of a clerical error. 2. The issuing authority shall, at the request of any person demonstrating a legitimate interest or, where this is possible under national law, of its own motion, modify or withdraw the Certificate where it has been established that the Certificate or individual elements thereof are not accurate. 3. The issuing authority shall inform without delay all persons to whom certified copies of the Certificate have been issued pursuant to Article 54(1) of any rectification, modification or withdrawal thereof.Article 55 deleted of the Certificate
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 523 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56
1. Decisions taken by the issuing authority pursuant to Article 51 may be challenged by the applicant for a Certificate or a legal representative. Decisions taken by the issuing authority pursuant to Article 55 and point (a) of Article 57(1) may be challenged by any person demonstrating a legitimate interest. The challenge shall be lodged before a court in the Member State of the issuing authority in accordance with the law of that Member State. 2. If, as a result of a challenge as referred to in paragraph 1, it is established that the Certificate issued is not accurate, the competent court shall rectify, modify or withdraw the Certificate or ensure that it is rectified, modified or withdrawn by the issuing authority. If, as a result of a challenge as referred to in paragraph 1, it is established that the refusal to issue the Certificate was unjustified, the competent court shall issue the Certificate or ensure that the issuing authority re-assesses the case and makes a fresh decision.Article 56 deleted Redress procedures
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 529 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57
Suspension of the effects of the Certificate 1. The effects of the Certificate may be suspended by: (a) the issuing authority, at the request of any person demonstrating a legitimate interest, pending a modification or withdrawal of the Certificate pursuant to Article 55; or (b) the court, at the request of any person entitled to challenge a decision taken by the issuing authority pursuant to Article 56, pending such a challenge. 2. The issuing authority or, as the case may be, the court shall without delay inform all persons to whom certified copies of the Certificate have been issued pursuant to Article 54(1) of any suspension of the effects of the Certificate. During the suspension of the effects of the Certificate no further certified copies of the Certificate may be issued.Article 57 deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 537 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the application for, issuance, rectification, modification, withdrawal, suspension or redress procedures of the European Certificate of Parenthood.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 549 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 2
2. However, this Regulation shall, as between Member States, take precedence over conventions concluded exclusively between two or more of them in so far as such conventions concern matters governed by this Regulation.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 551 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1
1. The personal data required for the application of this Regulation shall be processed by Member State courts or other competent authorities for the purposes of the establishment of parenthood in cross- border situations and of the recognition of parenthood, in connection with the establishment of parenthood pursuant to Chapter II, the issuance of attestations pursuant to Articles 29, 37 and 45, the issuance of a European Certificate of Parenthood pursuant to Article 51, the presentation of the documents for the recognition of parenthood pursuant to Article 26, the obtaining of a decision that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition of parenthood pursuant to Article 25, or the application for refusal of recognition of parenthood pursuant to Article 32.
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 568 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the number of European Certificates of Parenthood issued; andeleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 573 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the courts and authorities competent to issue the European Certificate of Parenthood pursuant to Article 51, and the courts competent to deal with the redress procedures referred to in Article 56.deleted
2023/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 603 #

2022/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV
[...]deleted
2023/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 229 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Council underlined in its Conclusions of December 202038, that the revision of Directive 94/62/EC should update and establish more concrete, effective and easy to implement provisions to facilitate sustainable packaging in the internal market and minimise the complexity of packaging in order to foster economically feasible solutions, to improve the reusability and recyclability as well as minimise substances of concern in packaging materials, especially concerning food packaging materials, and to provide for labelling packaging in an easily understandable way to inform consumers about its recyclability and where its waste should be discarded to facilitate sorting and recycling. At the same time it noted that hygiene and food safety standards have to be respected. _________________ 38 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/docu ment/ST-13852-2020-INIT/en/pdf
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 232 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The European Parliament’s Resolution of 10 February 2021 on the New Circular Economy Action Plan39reiterated the objective of making all packaging reusable or recyclable in an economically viable way by 2030 and called on the Commission to present a legislative proposal including waste reduction measures and targets and ambitious essential requirements in the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive to reduce excessive packaging, including in e-commerce, improve recyclability and minimise the complexity of packaging, increase recycled content, phase out hazardous and harmful substances, and promote re-use. In addition, it stressed that food safety or hygiene standards must not be compromised. _________________ 39 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0040_EN.html
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 240 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) An item, which is an integral part of a product and is necessary to contain, support or preserve that product throughout its lifetime and where all elements are intended to be used, consumed or disposed of together, should not be considered as being packaging given that its functionality is intrinsically linked to it being part of the product. However, in light of the disposal behaviour of consumers regarding tea and coffee bags as well as coffee or tea system single-serve units, which in practice are disposed of together with the product residue leading to the contamination of compostable and recycling streams, those specific items should be treated as packaging. This is in line with the objective to increase the separate collection of bio-waste, as required by Article 22 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council41. Furthermore, to ensure coherence regarding end-of-life financial and operational obligations, also all coffee or tea system single-serve units necessary to contain coffee or tea should be treated as packaging. _________________ 41 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 247 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In line with the waste hierarchy set out in Article 4(21) of Directive 2008/98/EC, and with the requirement set in paragraph 2 of Article 4 of the same Directive, which foresees that specific waste streams may depart from the hierarchy where this is in line with life- cycle thinking to deliver the best overall environmental outcome, the measures provided for under this Regulation aim at reducing the amount of packaging placed on the market in terms of its volume and weight, and preventing the generation of packaging waste, especially through packaging minimisation, avoiding packaging where it is not needed, and increased re-use of packagingand recycling of packaging while delivering the best environmental outcome. In addition, the measures aim at increasing the use of recycled content in packaging, especially in plastic packaging where the uptake of recycled content is very low, as well as higher recycling rates for all packaging and high quality of the resulting secondary raw materials while reducing other forms of recovery and final disposal.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. In addition to the labelling requirements laid down in Article 11, Member States may provide for further labelling requirements, for the purpose of identifying the extended producer responsibility scheme or a deposit and return system other than those referred to in Article 44(1).deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 276 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
TBy 1 January 2026, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to supplement this Regulation in order to establish design for recycling criteria and recycling performance grades based on the criteria and parameters listed in Table 2 of Annex II for packaging categories listed in Table 1 of that Annex, as well as rules concerning the modulation of financial contributions to be paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations set out in Article 40(1), based on the packaging recycling performance grade, and for plastic packaging, the percentage of recycled content. Design-for- recycling criteria shall consider state of the art collection, sorting and recycling processes and shall cover all packaging components.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 290 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Designing packaging with the objective of its recycling, once it becomes packaging waste, is one the most efficient measures to improve the packaging circularity and raise packaging recycling rates and the use of recycled content in packaging, while ensuring marketing and consumer acceptance. Packaging design for recycling criteria have been established for a number of packaging formats under voluntary industry schemes or by some Member States for the purpose of the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees. In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and provide industry with a level playing field, and with the objective to promote the sustainability of packaging ensuring marketing and consumer acceptance, it is important to set mandatory requirements regarding the recyclability of packaging, by harmonising the criteria and the methodology for assessing packaging recyclability based on a design for recycling methodology at the Union level. In order to meet the objective set out in the CEAP that, by 2030, all packaging should be recyclable or reusable, in an economically viable manner, packaging recyclability performance grades should be established based on design for recycling criteria for packaging categories as listed in Annex II. However, packaging should comply with them only as of 1 January 2030 in order to give sufficient time to the economic operators to adapt.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 299 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) As design for recycling assessment in itself does not ensure that packaging is recycled in practice, it is necessary to establish a uniform methodology and criteria for assessing the recyclability of packaging in practice based on the state-of- the-art separate collection, sorting and recycling processes and infrastructure actually available in the Union. Related reporting from Member States and, where relevant, economic operators should support establishing the recyclability “at scale” thresholds and update, on this basis, the recyclability performance grades with respect to the specific packaging materials and categories. , preserving the added value conveyed to the final consumer with the packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 303 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From 1 January 2030, the plastic part in packaging shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Targets shall be calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed by a producer on the Union market.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 306 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to establish harmonised rules on packaging design to ensure its recyclability while ensuring packaging performs all its functions and ensuring marketing and consumer acceptance, the power to adopt delegated acts should be delegated to the Commission to set out detailed criteria for packaging design for recycling per packaging materials and categories, as well as for the assessment of the packaging recyclability at scale including for categories of packaging not listed in this Regulation. In order to give economic operators and Member States sufficient time to collect and report the necessary data to establish the “at scale” recycling methodology, the manufacturers should ensure that packaging is recycled at scale as of 2035. That should ensure that packaging complies with the design for recycling criteria, and is also recycled in practice on the basis of the state of the art processes for separate collection, sorting and recycling.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 308 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. From 1 January 2040, the plastic part in packaging shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Targets shall be calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed by a producer on the Union market.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 313 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to stimulate innovation in packaging, it is appropriate to allow that packaging, which presents innovative features resulting in significant improvement in the core function of packaging and has demonstrable environmental benefits, is given limited additional time of five years to comply withexempt from the recyclability requirements. The innovative features should be explained in the technical documentation accompanying the packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 316 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) In order to protect human and animal health and safety, due to the nature of the packaged products and the related requirements, it is appropriate that the recyclability requirements should not apply to immediate packaging as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council50and in Article 4(25) of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council51, which are in direct contact with the medicinal product, as well as contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council52andof in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council53.These exemptions should apply until 1 January 2035and contact sensitive packaging for foods covered by Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and Regulation (EU) No 609/2013. _________________ 50 Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67). 51 Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing Directive 2001/82/EC (OJ L 4, 7.1.2019, p. 43). 52 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1). 53 Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 332 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In order to ensure a high level of human and animal health protection in accordance with requirements in Union legislation and to avoid any risk to the security of supply and to the safety of medicines and medical devices safety, it is appropriate to provide for the exclusion from the obligation of a minimum recycled content in plastic packaging for immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point 23, of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 25, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6, as well as for contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/745 and for contact sensitive packaging of in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746 and of contact sensitive packaging for foods covered by Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and Regulation (EU) No 609/2013. This exclusion should also apply to outer packaging of human and veterinary medicinal products as defined in Article 1, point 24, of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 26, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 in cases where it has to comply with specific requirements to preserve the quality of the medicinal product.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 336 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and ensure the efficient implementation of the obligations, economic operators should ensure that the plastic part of each unit of packaging contains a certain minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post- consumer plastic waste calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed by a producer on the Union market. This provision should not apply to food or feed contact plastic packaging in those cases when the recycled content risks affecting human and animal health and/or compromising the organoleptic characteristics of products.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 368 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) The bio-waste waste stream is oftencould be contaminated with conventional plastics and the material recycling streams are oftencould be contaminated with compostable plastics. This cross-contamination could leads to waste of traditional and compostable resources, lower quality secondary raw materials and should be prevented at source. As the proper disposal route for compostable plastic packaging is becoming increasingly confusing for consumers, it is justified andTherefore, it is necessary to lay down clear and common rules on the use of compostableand disposal of plastic packaging, mandating it only when its use brings a clear benefit for the environment or for human health. This is particularly the case when the use of compostable packaging helps collect or dispose of bio-wastelabeled as compostable, including the possibility to mandating applications. This is particularly the case when the use of compostable packaging helps collect or recycle of bio-waste. All plastic packaging labeled as compostable shouldn’t go into material recycling.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 373 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) For limited packaging applications made of biodegradable plastic polymers, there is a demonstrable environmental benefit of using compostable packagingThere is a demonstrable environmental benefit of using compostable packaging for specific packaging applications (e.g., those strictly linked to food and food waste), which enters composting plants, including anaerobic digestion facilities under controlled conditions. Furthermore, where appropriate waste collection schemes and waste treatment infrastructures are available in a Member State as required by Article 22 of Directive 2008/98, there should be a limited flexibility in deciding whether to mandate the use of compostable plastics for lightweight plastic carrier bags on its territory. In order to avoid consumer confusion about the correct disposal and considering the environmental benefit of circularity of the carbon, all other plastic packaging not labeled as compostable should go into material recycling and the design of such packaging should ensure that it does not affect the recyclability of other waste streams.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 377 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Where justified and appropriate due to technological and regulatory developments impacting the disposal of compostable plastics and under the specific conditions ensuring that the use of such materials is beneficial for the environmental and human health, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to amend or extend the list of compostable packaging.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 381 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) In order to facilitate conformity assessment with requirements on compostable packaging, it is necessary to provide for presumption of conformity for compostable packaging which is in conformity with harmonised standards adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council56for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements and take into account, in line with the latest scientific and technological developments, the parameters, including compostquality of the output, proper processingtimes and admissible levels of contamination, which reflect the actual conditions in bio- waste treatment facilities, including anaerobic digestion processes. _________________ 56 Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 385 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) It should be recalled that all compostable packaging constituting a food contact material is to meet the requirements set out in the Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 388 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) Packaging should be designed, where relevant for a given shape, so as to minimise its volume and weight while maintaining its ability to perform the packaging functions, including those referred to in Article 3 (1). The manufacturer of packaging should assess the packaging against the performance criteria, as listed in Annex IV of this Regulation. In view of the objective of this Regulation to reduce packaging and packaging waste generation and to improve circularity of packaging across the internal market, it is appropriate to further specify the existing criteria and to make them more stringent. The list of the packaging performance criteria, as listed in the existing harmonised standard EN 13428:200057, should therefore be modified. While marketing and consumer acceptance remain relevant for packaging designpresentation,design and differentiation functionality, they should not be part ofthe mainperformance criteria justifying on their own additional packaging weight and volume. However, this should not compromise product or packagingspecifications for craft and industrial products and food , beveragesand agricultural products that are registered aundprotected under theEU geographical indication protection schemeer or otherwiseprotected by Union intellectual property law orEU geographical indication protection schemes, including third country geographical indication/products that have been given distinctive recognition by the Union, as part of the Union’s objective to protect intellectual property,cultural heritage and traditional know- how.Traditional packaging associated with products that have been given distinctive recognition or are subject to geographical indications of origin protection shall nevertheless look to reduce packaging weight to the lowest weight possible whilst protecting the shape of the packaging in line with the overall ambitions of this proposal. On the other hand, recyclability, the use of recycled content, and re-use may justify additional packaging weight or volume, and should be added to the performance criteria. Packaging with double walls, false bottoms and other characteristics only aimed to increase the perceived product volume should not be placed on the market, as it does not meet the requirement for packaging minimisation. The same rule should apply to superfluous packaging not necessary for ensuring packaging functionality. _________________ 57 Packaging – Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition – Prevention by source reduction.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 409 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) It is necessary to inform consumers and to enable them to appropriately dispose of packaging waste, including compostable lightweight and very lightweight plastic carrier bags. The most appropriate manner to do this is to establish a harmonised labelling system based on the material composition of packaging for sorting of waste, and to pair it with corresponding labels on waste receptacles. To this end, the Commission and the Member States should provide incentives, including economic ones, especially to micro- enterprises and SMEs.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 416 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) In order to inform end-users about reusability, availability of systems for re- use and location of collection points as regards reusable packaging, such packaging should bear a QR code or other data carrier that provides such information. The QR code should also facilitate tracking and the calculation of trips and rotations. In addition, reusable sales packaging should be clearly identified at the point of sale. To this end, the Commission and the Member States should provide incentives, including economic ones, especially to micro-enterprises and SMEs.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 416 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. Packaging included in an extended producer responsibility scheme or covered by a deposit and return system other than that referred to in Article 44(1) may be identified by means of a corresponding symbol throughout the territory in which that scheme or system applies. That symbol shall be clear and unambiguous and shall not mislead consumers or users as to the recyclability or reusability of the packaging.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 436 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) In order to ensure a high level of environmental protection in the internal market as well as a high level of food safety and hygiene, and facilitate the achievement of the packaging waste prevention targets, unnecessary or avoidable packaging should not be allowed to be placed on the market. The list of such packaging formats is provided in Annex V of this Regulation. In order to adapt the list to the technical and scientific progress the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to amend the list.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 460 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
(67) In order to reduce the increasing proportion of packaging that is single use and the growing amounts of packaging waste generated, it is necessary to establish quantitative re-use and refill targets on packaging in sectors, which have been assessed as having the greatest potential for packaging waste reduction, namely food and beverages for take-away, large- white goods and some transport packaging. This was appraised based on factors such as existing systems for re-use, necessity of using packaging and the possibility of fulfilling the functional requirements in terms of containment, tidiness, health, hygiene and safety. Differences of the products and their production and distribution systems, were also taken into account. The setting of the targets is expected to support the innovation and increase the proportion of re-use and refill solutions. The use ofIn accordance with Article 4(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC, restriction shall not apply for single -use packaging for food and beverages filled and consumed within the premises in the HORECA sector should not be alloweddelivering a better overall environmental outcome justified by life cycle thinking, as well as a better overall economic and health impact.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 465 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) To increase their effectiveness and ensure the equal treatment of economic operators, the re-use and refill targets should be placed on the economic operators. In cases of targets for beverages, they should be additionally placed also on the manufacturers, as these actors are able to control the packaging formats used for the products they offer and decide based on thorough consideration of logistics, environmental, technical, industrial and consumer criteria. The targets should be calculated as a percentage of sales in reusable packaging within a system for re- use or through refill or, in case of transport packaging, as a percentage of uses. The targets should be material neutral. A detailed assessment should be carried out to ensure that reuse targets can be implemented in a safe, economically viable and environmentally sustainable way that would bring tangible benefits compared to recyclable alternatives. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of targets for re-use and refill, the power to adopt an implementing act in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty on the methodology for their calculation, should be delegated to the Commission.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 484 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
(78) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the recourse to common technical specifications, the power to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to lay down, amend or repeal common technical specifications for the requirements on sustainability, labelling and systems for re- use, and to adopt test, measurement or calculation methods. That should be limited to those cases where technical standardization is unable to provide a concrete response to the purposes of this Regulation.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 495 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91
(91) To achieve an ambitious and sustained reduction in the overall packaging waste generation, targets should be laid down for the reduction of packaging waste per capita to be achieved by 2030. Meeting a target of 5 % reduction in 2030 compared to 2018 should entail an overall absolute reduction of approximately 19 % on average acmaterial (plastics, wood, ferrosus the Union in 2030 compared to the 2030 baseline. Member States should reduce packaging waste generation by 10 %, compared to 2018, by 2035; this is estimated to reduce packaging waste by 29 % compared to the 2030 baseline. In order to ensure that the reduction efforts continue beyond 2030, a reduction target of 10 % from 2018, which would mean a reduction of 29 % compared to baseline, should be set for 2035 and, for 2040, a reduction target of 15 % from 2018, which means a reduction of 37 % compared to baseline should be establishedmetals, aluminium, glass and paper and cardboard) per capita to be achieved by 2040.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 503 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91 a (new)
(91a) Waste prevention through reduction at source by material should be a key guiding principle, as per the existing harmonised standard EN 13428:200030, whereby the substitution of one packaging material by another is not a basis for source reduction.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 516 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 98
(98) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council66lays down rules on the traceability of traders, which more specifically contain obligations for providers of online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with producers offering packaging to consumers located in the Union. In order to prevent free-riding from the extended producer responsibility obligations, it should be specified how such providers of online platforms should fulfil those obligations with regard to the registers of packaging producers established pursuant to this Regulation. In that context, providers of online platforms, falling within the scope of Section 4 of Chapter 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with producers should obtain from those producers information about their compliance with the extended producer responsibility rules set out in this Regulation. The rules on traceability of traders selling packaging online are subject to the enforcement rules set out in Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. As it can be difficult to supervise the concrete application of the obligations of the Regulation in the case of distance selling, particular attention should be paid to tools and control methods that ensure the proper implementation of the provisions. _________________ 66 Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 522 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22
Restrictions on use of certain packaging 1. Economic operators shall not place on the market packaging in the formats and for the purposes listed in Annex V. 2. paragraph 1, economic operators shall not place on the market packaging in the formats and for the purposes listed in point 3 of Annex V as of 1 January 2030. 3. economic operators from point 3 of Annex V if they comply with the definition of micro-company in accordance with rules set out in the Commission Recommendation 2003/361, as applicable on [OP: Please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this Regulation], and where it is not technically feasible not to use packaging or to obtain access to infrastructure that is necessary for the functioning of a reuse system. 4. empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend Annex V in order to adapt it to technical and scientific progress with the objective to reducing packaging waste. When adopting those delegated acts, the Commission shall consider the potential of the restrictions on the use of specific packaging formats to reduce the packaging waste generated while ensuring an overall positive environmental impact, and shall take into account the availability of alternative packaging solutions that meet requirements set out in legislation applicable to contact sensitive packaging, as well as their capability to prevent microbiological contamination of the packaged product.Article 22 deleted formats By way of derogation from Member States may exempt The Commission shall be
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 529 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 103
(103) Deposit and return systems should be obligatory for single use plastic beverage bottles and metal beverage containers. Member States might also decide to include other packaging in these systems, in particular single use glass bottles, and should ensure that deposit and return systems for single-use packaging formats, in particular for single use glass beverage bottles, are equally available for reusable packaging, where technically and economically feasible. They should consider establishing deposit and return systems also for reusable packaging. In such situations, a Member State should be allowed, while observing the general rules laid down in the Treaty and complying with the provisions set out in this Regulation, adopt provisions which go beyond the minimum requirements set out in this Regulation.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 570 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 141 a (new)
(141a) For the sake of clarity for food business operators, the nomenclature codes referred to food categories mentioned in Article 26 and Article 44 are taken from the Combined Nomenclature as defined in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/871 and as set out in Annex I thereto, which are valid at the time of publication of this Regulation and mutatis mutandis as amended by subsequent legislation.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 583 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to all packaging, with the exception of packaging approved for the transport of dangerous goods regardless of the material used, and to all packaging waste, whether such waste is used in or originates from industry, other manufacturing, retail or distribution, offices, services or households.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 588 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation applies without prejudice to Union regulatory requirements for packaging such as those regarding safety, quality, the protection of health and the hygiene of the packed products, or to transport requirements, as well as without prejudice to the provisions of the Directive 2008/98/EC as regards the management of hazardous waste and as regards the requirements provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 593 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. By January 2023, Member States shall ensure that systems are set up to provide for the return and separate collection of all packaging waste from the end users in a given year in order to ensure that it is treated in accordance with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, and to facilitate its preparation for re-use and high quality recycling. Packaging complying with Design for Recycling criteria adopted on the basis of article 6(4) shall be collected for recycling.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 604 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
(f) permeable tea or coffee bagsingle- serve units necessary to contain a tea or coffee product and intended to be used and disposed of together with the product;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 616 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point g
(g) coffee or tea systemprotective beverage single-serve unit necessary to contain a coffee or tea product and intended to be used and disposed of together with the product;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 620 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) 'recyclability' means the compatibility of packaging with the management and processing of waste, based on separate collection, sorting in separate streams, recycling at scale, and use of recycled materials to replace primary raw materials;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 626 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex V
RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF PACKAGING FORMATS [...]deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 634 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 642 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) ‘composite packaging’ means a unit of packaging made of two or more different materials, excluding materials used for labels, closures and sealing, which cannot be separated manually and therefore form a single integraloatings, linings, paints, inks, adhesives, closures and sealing which are considered as part of the weight of the main packaging material, which cannot be separated manually and therefore form a single integral unit, unless a given material constitutes an insignificant part of the packaging unit and in no case more than 15% of the total mass of the packaging unit;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 695 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 32
(32) ‘recycled at scale’ means collected, sorted and recycled through installed state-of-the-art infrastructure and processes, covering at least 75 % of the Union populationthe existence of a clear pathway, including the development of sufficient capacity for the collected packaging waste to be directed towards defined and recognised waste streams through established industrial processes for reprocessing, including packaging waste exported from the Union that meets the requirements of Article 47(5);
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 702 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 32 a (new)
(32a) 'high quality recycling’ means any recovery operation, as defined in Article 3, point (17), of Directive 2008/98/EC, that ensures that the distinct quality of the collected and sorted waste is preserved or recovered during that recovery operation, so that the resulting recycled materials are of sufficient quality to substitute primary raw materials with minimal loss of quantity, quality or function;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 716 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 34
(34) ‘integrated component’ means a packaging component that may be distinct from the main body of the packaging unit, and may be of a different material, but is integral to the packaging unit and its functioning and does not need to be separated from the main packaging unit in order to consume the product and is typically discarded at the same time as the packaging unit, although not necessarily in the same disposal route;is recommended to be disposed together with the main body of the packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 723 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35
(35) ‘separate component’ means a packaging component that is distinct from the main body of the packaging unit, which may be of a different material, that needs to becan be manually disassembled completely and permanently from the main packaging unit in order to access the product, and that is typically discarded prior to anbody of the packaging by the end consumer, and that is recommended to be disposed separately from the main body of the packaging unit;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 733 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 38
(38) ‘secondary raw materials’ means materials that have been obtained through recycling processes and can substitute primary raw materials;deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 741 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new)
(39a) “recycled content in plastic packaging” is the amount of material contained in the packaging obtained from any recycling process of pre-consumer and post-consumer waste, whether to be recycled mechanically, physically or chemically.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 746 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 39 b (new)
(39b) 'pre-consumer plastic waste' means plastic waste that is generated from production and converting of plastic material.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 783 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
The definitions of ‘substance of concern’ and ‘data carrier’ laid down in Article [2 points (28) and (30)] of Regulation [Ecodesign for sustainable products] shall apply;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 799 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. In addition to the labelling requirements laid down in Article 11, Member States may provide for further labelling requirements, for the purpose of identifying the extended producer responsibility scheme or a deposit and return system other than those referred to in Article 44(1).deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 812 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Any additional Member State information and labelling requirements that go beyond the requirements of this Regulation shall not be considered as mandatory but used on a voluntary basis.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 816 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Packaging shall be so manufactured that the presence and concentration of substances of concernthat meet the criteria in Article 57 and identified in accordance with Article 59(1) in a concentration above 0,1 % weight by weight (w/w) as laid down the Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, as constituents of the packaging material or of any of the packaging components is minimised, including with regard to their presence in emissions and any outcomes of waste management, such as secondary raw materials, ashes or other material for final disposal.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 821 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice toOther than the substances criteria laid down in Article 5(1), shall be applied the restrictions on chemicals set out in Annex XVII of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 or, where applicable, to the restrictions and specific measures on food contact packaging in Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004, the sum of concentration levels of lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium resulting from substances present in packaging or packaging components shall not exceed 100 mg/kg.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 843 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Recyclability requirements established in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 6(5)by CEN - European Committee for Standardization shall not restrict the presence of substances in packaging or packaging components for reasons relating primarily to chemical safety. They shall address, as appropriate, substances of concern that negatively affect the re-use and recycling of materials in the packaging in which they are present, and shall, as appropriate, identify the specific substances concerned and their associated criteria and limitations.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 875 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) it is designed for recycling or, for compostable packaging, is compliant with point a), b) and c) of Annex III;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 894 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) except for compostable plastics, it can be recycled so that the resulting secondary raw materials are of sufficient quality to substitute the primarya raw materials;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 910 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 934 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Recyclable packaging shall, from 1 January 2030, comply with the design for recycling criteria as laid down in the delegated actsCEN standards, where applicable, adopted pursuant to paragraph 4 and, from 1 January 2035, also with the recyclability at scale requirements laid down in the delegated actCEN standards adopted pursuant to paragraph 6. Where such packaging complies with those delegated actstandards, it shall be considered to comply with paragraph 2, points (a) and (e).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 953 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
TWhitin 12 months from the adoption of the Regulation the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in close cooperation with stakeholders, in accordance with Article 58 to supplement this Regulation in order to establish design for recycling criteria and recycling performance grades based on the criteria and parameters listed in Table 2 of Annex II for packaging categories listed in Table 1 of that Annex, as well as rules concerning the modulation of financial contributions to be paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations set out in Article 40(1), based on the packaging recycling performance grade, and for plastic packaging, the percentage of recycled content. Design-for- recycling criteria shall consider state of the art collection, marketing and consumer acceptance criteria, sorting and recycling processes and shall cover all packaging components.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 974 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in close cooperation with stakeholders, in accordance with Article 58 to amend Table 1 of Annex in order to adapt it to scientific and technical development in material and product design, collection, sorting and recycling infrastructure.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1027 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) detailed design for recycling criteria including material specific requirements on the quality of recycling, where and when needed, for each packaging formaterial and category listed in Table 1 of Annex II;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1042 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Small components (i.e., <50 mm in two dimensions) represent a particular challenge to current packaging material recycling facility capabilities. By way of derogation from paragraphs 2 and 3, such small components may be placed on the market until the Delegated Act establishing the Design for Recycling criteria is adopted. The Design for Recycling criteria to be established under the Delegated Act as referred to in paragraph 4 shall consider the requirements for small components and be compatible with the state of the art collection, sorting and recycling processes.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1052 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Where use is made of this derogation, innovative packaging shall be accompanied by technical documentation, referred to in Annex VII, demonstrating its innovative nature and showing compliance with the definition in Article 3(347) of this Regulation.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1057 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1062 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1065 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 10 – point c
(c) contact sensitive plastic packaging of in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1074 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. outer packaging as defined in Article 1, point (24), of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point (26), of Regulation (EU) 2019/6, in cases where such packaging is necessary to comply with specific requirements to preserve the quality of the medicinal product. Should the adoption of the delegated acts referred to in paragraphs 4 and 6 of this Article be delayed, a presumption of compliance with the points a) and e) of paragraph 2 shall apply to all packaging placed on the Union market until such delegated acts are adopted.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1112 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From 1 January 2030, the plastic part in packaging shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from pre-consumer or post- consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging:
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1116 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 30 % for contact sensitive plastic packaging made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as the major component;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1132 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 10 % for contact sensitive plastic packaging made from plastic materials other than PET, except single use plastic beverage bottles;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1146 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Targets per material shall be calculated as a percentage of the total number of units placed by a producer on the internal market.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1175 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. From 1 January 2040, the plastic part in packaging shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from pre-consumer or post- consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging:
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1187 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Targets per material shall be calculated as a percentage of the total number of units placed by a producer on the internal market.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1196 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/745;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1198 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) contact sensitive plastic packaging of in vitro diagnostics medical devices covered by Regulation (EU) 2017/746;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1213 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to compostable plastic packaging. as well as to inks, adhesives, varnishes and coatings used on packaging. Compostable packaging can be placed on the market providing the presence of a minimum content of renewable raw material determined as percentage of carbon of biological origin present in packaging compared to the total carbon present therein and using for this purpose the current European standard on the subject based on radiocarbon methods EN 16640. Agricultural biomass used for the manufacture of compostable packaging complies with the criteria laid down in Article 29, paragraphs 2 to 5, of Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Forest biomass used for the manufacture compostable packaging complies with the criteria laid down in Article 29, paragraphs 6 and 7 of that Directive.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1230 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. By 12 months from the entry into force of this Regulation, compostable packaging shall contain a minimum content of renewable raw material of at least 60%.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1232 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1240 #

2022/0396(COD)

6. By 1 January 2030, the financial contributions paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations as laid down in Article 40 shall be modulated based on the percentage of recycled content used in the packagingtaking into account the cost of packaging waste management and the revenues from sales of secondary materials.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1246 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. By 31 December 2026, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of plastic packaging, and the format for the technical documentation referred to in Annex VII. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3). The implementing acts can specify that calculation of recycled content from packaging covered by Regulation No 1935/2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food is only included in the calculation of recycled content if the packaging application is also covered by Regulation No 1935/2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1287 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
By 1 January 2028, the Commission shall assess the need for derogations from the minimum percentage laid down in paragraph 1, points b and d, for specific plastic packaging, or for the revision of the derogation established under paragraph 3 for specific plastic packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1309 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) provide for derogations from the scope, timing or level of minimum percentage laid down in paragraph 1, points b and d, for specific plastic packaging, and, as appropriate,
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1312 #
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1347 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By 2030 [OP: please insert the date = 24 months from the entry into force of this Regulation], packaging referred to in Article 3(1), points (f) and (g), sticky labels attached to fruit and vegetables and very lightweight plastic carrier bags shall be compostable in industrially controlled conditions in bio-waste treatment facilities and therefore allowed to be collected in bio-waste receptacles.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1362 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Compostable packaging can be placed on the market providing the presence of a minimum content of renewable raw material determined as percentage of carbon of biological origin present in packaging compared to the total carbon present therein and using for this purpose the current European standard on the subject based on radiocarbon methods EN 16640. Agricultural biomass used for the manufacture of compostable packaging complies with the criteria laid down in Article 29, paragraphs 2 to 5, of Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Forest biomass used for the manufacture compostable packaging complies with the criteria laid down in Article 29, paragraphs 6 and 7 of that Directive.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1363 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Where appropriate waste collection schemes and waste treatment infrastructure are available to ensure that packaging referred to in paragraph 1 enters the organic waste management stream, Member States are empowered to require that lightweight plastic carrier bags shall be made available on their market for the first time only if it can be demonstrated that those lightweight plastic carrier bags have been entirely manufactured from biodegradable plastic polymers, which are compostable in industrially controlled conditions.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1372 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States which have transposed Article 22 of Directive 2008/98 and have appropriate waste collection schemes and waste treatment infrastructure are empowered to require that lightweight plastic carrier bags shall be compostable in industrially controlled conditions. The same provision shall apply to compostable packaging formats.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1378 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. By [OP: Please insert the date = 24 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], packaging, labeled as compostable, other than that referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including packaging made of biodegradshall comply with the criteria listed in Annex III. Packaging made with compostable material that is not labele plastic polymers,d as compostable shall allow material recycling without affecting the recyclability of other waste streams.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1381 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. By [OP: please insert the date = 12 months from the entry into force of this Regulation] compostable packaging shall contain a minimum content of renewable raw material of at least 60%.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1383 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. TAfter an assessment of the Expert Group, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article by addingdd other types of packaging to the types of packaging covered by those paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article when it is justified and appropriate due to technological and regulatory developments impacting the disposal of compostable packaging and under the conditions set out in Annex III. A public register containing the lists of such applications should be established and updated by the Commission.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1390 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. By 1 January 2030, the financial contributions paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations as laid down in Article 40 shall be collected and managed by a dedicated extended producer responsibility scheme.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1402 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. PBy 1 January 2030, packaging shall be designed so that its weight and volume is reduced to the minimum necessary for ensuring its functionalitys, as listed in the definition of packaging in Article 3(1), taking account of the material that the packaging is made of and its design, for a given material and a given shape.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1422 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. PBy 1 January 2030, packaging not necessary to comply with any of the performance criteria set out in Annex IV and packaging with characteristics that are only aimed to increase the perceived volume of the product, including double walls, false bottoms, and unnecessary layers, shall not be placed on the market, unless the packaging design is subject to geographical indications of origin, shall not be placed on the market, unless the product or packaging design is subject to intellectual property protection or benefits from the Union's geographical indications of origin protection or have been given distinctive product recognition by the Union, in each case protected under Union legislation.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1432 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
EBy 1 Januart 2030, empty space shall be reduced to the minimum necessary for ensuring the packaging functionality as follows:
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1437 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of assessing the compliance with this paragraph, space filled by paper cuttings, air cushions, bubble wraps, sponge fillers, foam fillers, wood wool, polystyrene, styrofoam chips or other filling materials shall be considered as empty space, unless required to protect and to transport the goods.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1445 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the identification of the design requirements, including those related to intellectual property rights , which prevent further reduction of the packaging weight or volume, for each of these performance criteria;
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1465 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it has been conceived and designed to accomplish as many trips or rotations as possible in normally predictable conditions of use;deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1498 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
From [OP: Please ins36 months aftert the date = 42 months after the entry into forceadoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5 and 6, information ofn this Regulae material composition], of packaging shall be marked with a label containing information on its material composition. This obligation does not apply to transport packagingon the packaging or shall be available through digital means according to art 11(4), to facilitate sorting by citizens. This obligation does not apply to transport packaging, to packaging mentioned in Article 7, paragraph 3 and to reusable gas receptacles. However, it applies to e-commerce packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1530 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. From [OP: Please insert the date = 48 months after the date of entry into force of this Regul36 months after the adoption of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 5, information], on packaging shall bear a label on packaging reusability andreusability shall be marked on a label on packaging or shall be available through a QR code or other type of digital data carrier that provides further information on packaging reusability including the availability of a system for re-use and of collection points, and that facilitates the tracking of the packaging and the calculation of trips and rotations. In addition, reusable sales packaging shall be clearly identified and distinguished from single use packaging at the point of sale.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1541 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Labels referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 and the QR code or other type of digital data carrier referred to in paragraph 2 shall be placed, printed or engraved visibly, clearly legibly and indelibly on the packaging. Where this is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature and size of the packaging, information should be conveyed to consumers via digital means of communication (e.g., website, QR code) or they shall be affixed to the grouped packaging.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1547 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
By way of derogation from paragraph 4, the information referred to in paragraph 1 to 3 may be provided by electronic means identified on the package or on a label attached thereto.In such cases, the following requirements apply: (a) no user data shall be collected or tracked; (b) the information shall not be displayed with other information intended for sales or marketing purposes.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1550 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Where Union legislation requires information on the packaged product to be provided via a data carrier, a single data carrier shall be used for providing the information required for both the packaged product and the packaging. From [Please insert the date = 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission shall adopt guidance regarding provision of information by digital means.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1557 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. By [OP: Please insert the date = 18 2 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts to establish a harmonised label and specifications for the labelling requirements and formats for the labelling of or the digital provision of information related to packaging referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 and the labelling of waste receptacles referred to in Article 12. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1562 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. By [OP: Please insert the date = 124 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts to establish the methodology for identifying the material composition of packaging referred to in paragraph 1 by means of digital marking technologies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1574 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. Packaging included in an extended producer responsibility scheme or covered by a deposit and return system other than that referred to in Article 44(1) mayshall be identified by means of a corresponding symbol throughout the territory in which that scheme or system applies. That symbol shall be clear and unambiguous and shall not mislead consumers or users as to the recyclability or reusability of the packagingharmonised symbol to be established via an implementing act by the Commission in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59 (3).
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1580 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Packaging referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, manufactured or imported before these deadlines, may be marketed until the stocks of the products are exhausted.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1607 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. Manufacturers shall indicate on the packaging or on a QR code or another data carrier their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as the postal address, and where available, the electronic means of communication, where they can be contacted. Where that is not possible, the required information shall be provided as part of the information through the QR code referred to in Article 11(2) or the data carrier referred to in Article 11(4) or in a document accompanying the packaged product. The postal address shall indicate a single point at which the manufacturer can be contacted. Such information shall be clear, understandable and legible.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1619 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Paragraphs 1 to 6 do not apply to custom made transport packaging for configurable devices and systems designed to be used in industrial and healthcare settings.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1630 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Importers shall indicate on the packaging their name and their registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as the postal address, and, where available, the electronic means of communication, where they can be contacted. Where that is not possible, the required information shall be provided via the data carrier or in a document accompanying the packaged product. The contact details shall be clear, understandable and legible.deleted
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1643 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the manufacturer and the importer have complied with the requirements set out in Article 13(5) and (6) and Article 16(3) respectively.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1666 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Economic operators who supply products to a final distributor or an end user in grouped packaging, transport packaging or e-commerce packaging, shall ensure that the empty space ratio is maximum 40 %inimised subject to the provisions within Part 1 and Part 2 of Annex IV.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1684 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Space filled by filling materials such as paper cuttings, air cushions, bubble wraps, sponge fillers, foam fillers, wood wool, polystyrene or Styrofoam chips, shall be considered as empty space, unless required to protect and to transport the goods.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1697 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22
Restrictions on use of certain packaging 1. Economic operators shall not place on the market packaging in the formats and for the purposes listed in Annex V. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, economic operators shall not place on the market packaging in the formats and for the purposes listed in point 3 of Annex V as of 1 January 2030. 3. Member States may exempt economic operators from point 3 of Annex V if they comply with the definition of micro- company in accordance with rules set out in the Commission Recommendation 2003/361, as applicable on [OP: Please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this Regulation], and where it is not technically feasible not to use packaging or to obtain access to infrastructure that is necessary for the functioning of a reuse system. 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend Annex V in order to adapt it to technical and scientific progress with the objective to reducing packaging waste. When adopting those delegated acts, the Commission shall consider the potential of the restrictions on the use of specific packaging formats to reduce the packaging waste generated while ensuring an overall positive environmental impact, and shall take into account the availability of alternative packaging solutions that meet requirements set out in legislation applicable to contact sensitive packaging, as well as their capability to prevent microbiological contamination of the packaged product.Article 22 deleted formats
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1750 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend Annex V in order to adapt it to technical and scientific progress with the objective to reducing packaging waste and improving the overall environmental outcomes in line with paragraph 2 of Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC. When adopting those delegated acts, the Commission shall consider the potential of the restrictions on the use of specific non-recyclable packaging formats to reduce the packaging waste generated while ensuring an overall positive environmental impact, and shall take into account the availability of alternative packaging solutions that meet requirements set out in legislation applicable to contact sensitive packaging, as well as their capability to prevent microbiological contamination of the packaged product.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2217 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall reduce the packaging waste generated per capita, as compared to the packaging waste generated per capita in 2018the year of entry into force of this Regulation as reported to the Commission in accordance with Decision 2005/270/EC, for each of the specific materials contained in packaging waste listed in article 46, by
2023/05/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2253 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3
3. For the purpose of paragraph 2, Member States may use economic instruments and other measures to provide incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy, such as measures referred to in Annexes IV and IVa to Directive 2008/98/EC, or other appropriate instruments and measures, including incentives through extended producer responsibility schemes and requirements on producers or producer responsibility organisations to adopt waste prevention plans. Such measures shall be proportionate and non-discriminatory and be designed so as to avoid barriers to trade or distortions of competition in conformity with the Treaty and with Article 4 of this Regulation.
2023/05/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2271 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. Producers shall be obliged to register in the register referred to in paragraph 1. They shall, to that end, submit an application for registration in each Member State where they make packaging available on the market for the first timethe home country. Where a producer has appointed a producer responsibility organisation as referred to in Article 41(1), the obligations set out in this Article shall be met by that organisation, unless otherwise specified by the Member State in which the register is established.
2023/05/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2305 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2030, Member States shall ensure that systems are set up to provide for the return and the separate collection of 90% of all packaging waste from the end users of each packaging format listed in Table 1 Annex II, in a given year, in order to ensure that it is treated in accordance with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, and to facilitate its preparation for re-use and high quality recycling.
2023/05/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2352 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2030, Member States shall ensure that systems are set up to provide for the return and the separate collection of 90% of all packaging waste from the end users of each packaging format listed in Table 1 Annex II, in a given year, in order to ensure that it is treated in accordance with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, and to facilitate its preparation for re-use and high quality recycling.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2353 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2030, Member States shall ensure that systems are set up to provide for the return and the separate collection of 90% of all packaging waste from the end users of each packaging format listed in Table 1 Annex II, in a given year, in order to ensure that it is treated in accordance with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, and to facilitate its preparation for re-use and high quality recycling.
2023/05/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2711 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Table 2 a (new)
Indicative parameters that may be considered when developing design criteria for recycling under Article 6: 1. Additives 2. Labels 3. Closure systems and small parts 4. Adhesives 5. Printing inks 6. Colours 7. Material composition 8. Barriers / coatings 9. Ease of dismantling
2023/05/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Competent authorities that wish to receive from online short-term rental platforms information about hosts’ activities and have registration systems in place should be able to obtain activity data from online platforms on a regular basis. The type of data that may be obtained should be fully harmonised and include information on the number of nights for which a registered unit has been rented, the number of guests that stayed in the unit per night, their country or geographical area of residence, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit, which is needed in order to facilitate the identification of the host and the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services in cases where the registration number is missing or incorrect. Only online platforms that have effectively facilitated the conclusion of direct transactions between hosts and guests are covered by the obligation to provide the activity data, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit, as only those platforms are in a position to collect data, such as on the number of nights for which a unit is rented and the number of guests that stayed in the unit per night. Member States should not maintain or introduce measures that require platforms to report on short-term accommodation rental service providers and their activities diverging from those laid down in this Regulation, unless otherwise provided under Union law.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to providers of online short-term rental platforms that offer services to hostand online short-term rental advertising platforms that offer services to hosts and other online short-term rental platforms providing short-term accommodation rental services in the Union, irrespective of their place of establishment.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Regulation also applies to hosts providing short-term accommodation rental services in the Union, their intermediaries and the local authorities managing the data collected, irrespective of their place of establishment.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) ‘unit’ means a furnished accommodation located in the Union that is the subject of the provision of a short-term accommodation rental service, as further defined by national law. It does not include the following:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
(3a) ‘property manager’ means any entity that has been retained to perform and carry out short term rentals, operation and management services at one or more of the units owned by the host;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) ‘online short-term rental advertising platform’ means a service within the meaning of Article 3, point (i) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, that display advertising of short-term accommodation rental services on their platform but that do not allow guests to conclude distance contracts with hosts for the provision of short-term accommodation rental services;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘activity data’ means the number of nights for which a unit is rented corresponding to the number of actual stays in the unit and the number of guests that have been declared to stayed in the unit per night, and, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 692/2011, their country or geographical area of residence;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) the requirements on hosts underlying the registration procedures are proportionate, non-discriminatory and justified;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) registration procedures allow for theonline, automatic and, immediate issue of a registration number for a specific unit upon the submission by the host of the information referred to in Article 5(1) and, where appropriate, any supporting documentation required pursuant to Article 5(2);
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) hosts are required, when offering their short-term accommodation rental services via an online short-term rental platform or an online short-term rental advertising platform, to declare whether the unit offered is located in an area where a registration procedure has been established or applies and, if so, to provide the registration number.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 4 a (new)
(4a) where applicable, if the host uses the intermediary services of a property manager;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 195 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. Hosts shall be responsible for the accuracy of the information that they provide to competent authorities pursuant to this Article, and of the information that they provide to online short-term rental platforms and to online short-term rental advertising platforms pursuant to Article 7 of this Regulation.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Where a host fails to rectify the requested information pursuant to paragraph 2, the competent authority shall have the power to suspend the validity of the affected registration numbers and to issue an order requesting online short-term rental platforms and short-term advertising platforms to remove or disable access to any listing relating to the unit or units in question without undue delay.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 205 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Where a competent authority, after verification pursuant to paragraph 1, finds that there are manifest and serious doubts as regards the authenticity and validity of the information or documentation submitted pursuant to Article 5(1) and 5(2), it shall have the power to suspend the validity of the affected registration numbers and to issue an order requesting online short-term rental platforms and online short-term rental advertising platforms to remove or disable access to any listing relating to the unit or units in question without undue delay.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) clear information enabling the provider of the online short-term rental platform or the provider of the online short-term rental advertising platform to identify and locate the listing or listings concerned, such as one or more exact uniform resource locators (URL) and the identity of the competent authority;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) the identity of the host andregistration number of the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2022/0358(COD)

(c) make reasonable efforts to regularly carry out randomly checks of the declaration of the hosts concerning the existence or not of a registration procedure, taking into account the list made available pursuant to Article 13(1), point (a), and, where such a procedure exists, the validity of the registration number provided by the host, including through the use of the functionalities offered by the Single Digital Entry Points referred to in Article 10(2), point (b), after allowing the offering of the short-term accommodation rental services by the host.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 259 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) facilitate random checks by online short-term rental platforms and by online short-term rental advertising platforms pursuant to Article 7(1), point (c) of the validity of registration numbers provided by hosts;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 311 #

2022/0358(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [OP please insert date = 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. However, Article 7 and Article 9 shall apply from [OP please insert date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 258 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt supportive measures for facilitating free movement of persons, for establishing a list of individual targets (quantities and deadlines) for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain, so that the objectives of the initiative are achieved. Furthermore, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activating the vigilance mode and vigilance measures in order to carefully monitor the strategic supply chains and coordinate the building up of strategic reserves for goods and services of strategic importance. Moreover, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of a Single Market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 276 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a framework of measures to anticipate, prepare for and respond to impacts of crisesensure the proper functioning onf the Single Market, with the purpose of safeguarding the free movement of goods, services and persons and of ensuring the availability of goods and services of strategic importance and crisis-relevantternal market by setting out harmonised rules to ensure an effective response to crises and to facilitate the free movement of goods and, services in the Single Marketand persons.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 include: (a) Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis on the Single Market; (b) measures for obtaining, sharing and exchanging the relevant information; (c) contingency measures aiming at anticipation and planning; (d) measures for addressing Single Market impacts of significant incidents that have not yet resulted in a Single Market emergency (Single Market vigilance), including a set of vigilance measures and (e) measures for addressing Single Market emergencies, including a set of emergency response measures.deleted an advisory group to advise the
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall regularly exchange information on all matters falling within the scope of this Regulation among themselves and with the Commission.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 299 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may obtain any relevant specialised and/or scientific knowledge, which is necessary for the application of this Regulation.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. This Regulation is without predjudice to the European Union rules on Intellectual property rights.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 311 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the Commission: (a) cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with relevant third countries, with particular attention paid to developing countries, with a view to seeking cooperative solutions to avoid supply chain disruptions, in compliance with international obligations. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in relevant international fora; or (b) to impose restrictions to exports of goods in line with the international rights and obligations of the Union under Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council48 . __________________ 48 OJ L 83, 27.3.2015, p. 34.deleted entering into consultations or assessing whether it is appropriate
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 324 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘crisis’ means an exceptional unexpected and sudden, natural or man- made event of extraordinary nature and scale that takes place inside or outside of the Union which has a severe impact on the free movement of persons, goods and services;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 349 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘strategic reserves’ means a stock of goods of strategic importance under the control of a Member State for which building a reserve may be necessary to prepare for a Single Market emergency, under the control of a Member State.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory group and ensure its secretariat. The Commission may invite a representative of the European Parliament,, in accordance with the advisory group, may invite representatives of EFTA States that are contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area49 , representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations, social partners and experts, to attend meetings of the advisory group as observers. It shall invite the representatives of other crisis- relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the advisory group. __________________ 49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point f a (new)
(fa) establishing whether the criteria for the activation or deactivation of the vigilance mode have been fullfilled.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 414 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point e
(e) facilitating exchanges and sharing of information, including with other crisis- relevant bodies at Union level, as well as, as appropriate, third countries, with particular attention paid to developing countries, and intwith economic opernational organisationors.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 424 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. The advisory group may adopt opinions, recommendations or reports in the context of its tasks set out in paragraphs 4 to 6. These opinions, recommendations and reports are binding on the EU Commission.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 433 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall designate a Union level central liaison office for contacts with the central liaison offices of the Member States during the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes under this Regulation. The Union level central liaison office shall ensure the coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of the Member States for the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes. The central liaison offices of the Member States shall guarantee the transfer of information to stakeholders in the Emergency mode referred to in Part IV of the Regulation.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 437 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission taking into consideration the opinion of the advisory group, including economic operators and the input of relevant Union level bodies, is empowered after consulting the Member States, to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation with a framework setting out crisis protocols regarding crisis cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes, in particular:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 460 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall organise the training on crisis coordination, cooperation and information exchange referred to in Article 6 for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices from all Member States based on potential scenarios of Single Market emergencies, with the involvment of economic operators potentially involved in the various crisis scenarios.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The central liaison offices and any relevant national competent authorities shall, in accordance with Union law and national legislation that complies with Union law, treat the information referred to in paragraph 1 in a way that respects its confidentiality, protects the security and public order of the European Union or its Member States, and protects the security and commercial interests of the economic operators concerned, adopting all technological, digital and contractual instruments necessary to guarantee the secrecy of information. In the event of disclosure of secret information, economic operators shall have the right to take legal proceedings for compensation of damages.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 494 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where the Commission, taking intoin due consideration of the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, it shall activate the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act. Such an implementing act shall contain the following:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 515 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, if it considers that the reasons for activating the vigilance mode pursuant to Article 9(1) remain valid, and taking intoin due consideration of the opinion provided by the advisory group, may extend the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 533 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall provide for standardised and secure means for the collection and processing of information for the purpose of paragraph 1, using electronic means. Before providing the standardised means for information, the Commission shall carry out a consultation with the advisory group and the economic operators with a view to identifying the appropriate and proportionate content of the information, the reasonable deadline to provide them and to evaluate how to better protect sensitive information. Without prejudice to national legislation requiring collected information including business secrets to be kept confidential, confidentiality with regard to the commercially sensitive informationand information affecting the security and public order of the Union or its Member States shall be ensured.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 549 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission mayshall ask the advisory group to discuss the findings and prospects of evolution based on the monitoring of supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 555 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. On the basis of the information collected through the activities carried out in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission mayshall provide a report of the aggregated findings.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 562 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may, among the goods of strategic importance listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1),, in due consideration of the opinion of the advisory group, identify those for which it may be necessary to build a reserve in order to prepare for a Single Market emergency, taking into account the probability and impact of shortages. The Commission shall inform the Member States thereof.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 566 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may require, by means of implementing acts, that the Member States provide information on the goods listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1), as regards all of the following:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 567 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) any potential for further purchase;deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 568 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The implementing actrequests for information shall specify the goods for which information is to be given.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 569 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall report to the Commission the levels of strategic reserves of goods of strategic importance held by them, and the levels of other stocks of such goods held on their territory.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 573 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. Where the building of strategic reserves of goods of strategic importance identified pursuant to paragraph 1 can be rendered more effective by streamlining among Member States, the Commission may draw up and regularly update, by means of implementing acts, a list of individual targets regarding the quantities and the deadlines for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain. When setting the individual targets for each Member State, the Commission shall take into account: (a) shortages referred in paragraph 1; (b) economic operators and strategic reserves across the Union, and any information on economic operators’ ongoing activities to increase their stocks; (c) maintaining such strategic reserves.deleted the probability and impact of the level of existing stocks of the the costs for building and
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 575 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. The Member States shall regularly inform the Commission about the current state of their strategic reserves. Where a Member State has reached the individual targets referred to in paragraph 4, it shall inform the Commission if it has at its disposal any stocks of the goods in question in excess of their target. The Member States whose reserves have not reached the individual targets shall explain to the Commission the reasons for this situation. The Commission shall facilitate cooperation between the Member States which have already reached their targets and the other Member States.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 576 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Where the strategic reserves of a Member State continuously fall significantly short of the individual targets referred to in paragraph 4 and economic operators on its territory are not able to compensate that shortfall, the Commission may, at its own initiative or at the request of 14 Member States, assess the need to take further measures to build up strategic reserves of goods of strategic importance identified pursuant to paragraph 1.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 578 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 8
8. The implementing acts referred to in this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2).deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 622 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission, taking into due consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers there is a Single Market emergency, it shall propose to the Council to activate the Single Market emergency mode.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 631 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. As soon as the Single Market emergency mode is activated, the Commission shall, without delay, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services by means of an implementing act. The list may be amended by means of implementing acts.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 639 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission implementing act referred to in paragraph 5 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 642 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission considers, taking into due consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, that an extension of the Single Market emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to extend the Single Market emergency mode. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall endeavour to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the Single Market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of an implementing act.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 650 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Where the advisory group has concrete and reliable evidence that the Single Market emergency should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into due consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers a Single Market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council without delay the deactivation of the Single Market emergency mode.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 662 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. When adopting and applying national measures in response to a Single Market emergency and the underlying crisis, Member States shall ensure that their actions fully comply with the Treaty and Union law and, in particular, with the requirements laid down in this ArticleRestrictions on free movement of people, goods and services should only be adopted in absence of possible alternative measures and shall fully comply with the Treaty and Union law.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 668 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Any restriction shall be limited in time and immediately removed as soon as the situation allows it. Additionally, any restriction should take into due account the situation of border regions.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 676 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall inform citizens, consumers, businesses, workers and their representatives about measures that affect their free movement rights in a clear and unambiguous manner and shall be easily accessible.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 680 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that all affected stakeholders are informed of measures restricting free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers and service providers, before their entry into force. Member States shall ensure a continuous dialogue with stakeholders before and while adopting any potential restriction, including communication with social partners and international partners.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 705 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. During the Single Market emergency mode and when responding to the Single Market emergency, Member States shall refrain from any of the following, unless to do so is inherent to the nature of the crisis:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 708 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. During the Single Market emergency mode and when responding to a Single Market emergency, Member States shall refrain from any of the following unless to do so is inherent to the nature of the crisis/Single Market emergency:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 710 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) applying of more generous rules to travel to or from one Member State to or from another Member State or group of Member States, as compared to travel to and from other Member States unless to do so is inherent to the nature of the crisis/Single Market emergency;deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 765 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. The Commission shall publish the measures adopted by the Member States in the context of the internal market emergency that restrict free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, which have been notified. Those measures shall be published within one working day of their receipt via an electronic platform managed by the Commission. Information shall be clear and easily accessible, in particualr for people affected by disabilities.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 770 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that it is possible for citizens, consumers, economic operators and workers and their representatives to receive, at their request and via the respective single points of contact, information from the competent authorities on the way in which the respective national crisis response measures are generally interpreted and applied. Where appropriate, such information shall include a step-by-step guide. The information shall be provided in clear, understandable and intelligible language. It shall be easily accessible at a distance and by electronic means and shall be kept up to date. Member States shall make best efforts to provide the information in all official languages of the Union, paying particular attention to the situation and needs of the border regions.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 792 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Where there is a severe crisis- related shortages or an immediate threat thereof, the Commission may invite representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains to transmit on a voluntary basis, within a setreasonable time limit, specific information to the Commission on in accordance withe production capacities and possible existing stocks of crisis- relevant goods and components thereof in Union production facilities and third country facilities which it operates, caragraph 3. The information request contains a notice indicating that Single Points of Contracts or purchases supply from, as well as information on any relevant supply chain disruptions within a given deadlineperated by the Member States pursuant to Article 21 can provide support, especially to SMEs, in completing the request.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 809 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. Following the activation of the mandatory information requests to economic operators by means of an implementing act, the Commission shall address a formal decision to each of those representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains that have been identified in the implementing act, requesting them to provide the information specified in the implementing act. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States. The Commission may obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 814 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission Decisions containing individual information requests shall contain a reference to the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 on which they are based and to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency or for compiling relevant official statistics. A request shall set out a reasonable time limit within which the information is to be provided. It shall take into account the effort required to collect and make the data available by the economic operator or representative organisation. The formal decision shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 39 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information contained in the reply in accordance with Article 25, and information on the possibility of contesting it before the Court of Justice of the European Union in line with relevant Union law and the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply and the timeline for a reply.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 818 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 6
6. The owners of the economic operators or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons, companies or firms, or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution may supply the information requested on behalf of the economic operator or the association of economic operators concerned. Each economic operator or association of economic operators shall provide the requested information on an individual basis in line with the Union rules on competition governing the exchange of information. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 826 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. Member States and the Commission shall ensure the protection of trade and business secrets, intellectual property and other sensitive and confidential information acquired and generated in application of this Regulation, including recommendations and measures to be taken, in accordance with Union and the respective national law. In the event of an involuntary disclosure of data, the economic operator shall have the right to take legal proceedings for compensation of damages.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 829 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission mayshall present to the advisory group referred to in Article 4 aggregate information based on any information collected pursuant to Article 24.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 830 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26
Targeted amendments to harmonised When the Single Market emergency mode has been activated by means of a Council implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, and there is a shortage of crisis relevant goods the Commission may activate by means of implementing acts the emergency procedures included in the Union legal frameworks amended by [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and introducing emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context of a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and2014/68/EU and introducingas regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context ofdue to a Single Market] as regards crisis-relevant goods, indicating which crisis-relevant goods and emergency procedures are subject to the activation, providing reasons for such activation and its proportionality, and indicating the duration of such activation . Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).Article 26 deleted product legislation
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 845 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. If an economic operator does not accept and prioritise priority rated orders, the Commission may, following a positive opinion of the advisory group reached unanimously, at its own initiative or at the request of 14 Member States, assess the necessity and proportionality of resorting to priority rated orders in such cases, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned as well as any parties demonstrably affected by the potential priority rated order, the opportunity to state their position within a reasonable time limit set by the Commission in light of the circumstances of the case. In exceptional circumstances, following such an assessment, the Commission may, following a positive opinion of the advisory group reached unanimously, address an implementing act to the economic operator concerned, requiring it to either accept and prioritise the priority rated orders specified in the implementing act or explain why it is not possible or appropriate for that operator to do so. The Commission’s decision shall be based on objective data showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal economic activities in the Single Market
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 850 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept and prioritise the orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 10 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate, in light of the objectives of this provision, for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, particularly taking into account the prices and quantities specified by the Commission or other considerations of comparable gravity.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 853 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission may make such reasoned explanation or parts of it public, with due regard to business confidentiality.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 856 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall take the decision referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law. The decision shall in particular take into account the legitimate interests of the economic operator concerned and any available information concerning the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. It shall state the legal basis for its adoption, fix the time limits within which the priority rated order is to be performed and, where applicable, specify the product and quantity. It shall state the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply with the decision. The priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable priceThe priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price, which shall include, where relevant, an appropriate compensation for all additional costs incurred by the economic operator.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 857 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 8
8. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 859 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28
Fines to operators for failure to comply with the obligation to reply to mandatory information requests or to comply with 1. a decision, where deemed necessary and proportionate, impose fines: (a) organisation of economic operators or an economic operator, intentionally or through gross negligence, supplies incorrect, incomplete or misleading information in response to a request made pursuant to Article 24, or does not supply the information within the prescribed time limit; (b) intentionally or through gross negligence, does not comply with the obligation to inform the Commission of a third country obligation pursuant to Article 27 or fails to explain why it has not accepted a priority rated order; (c) intentionally or through gross negligence, does not comply with an obligation which it has accepted to prioritise certain orders of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority rated order’) pursuant to Article 27 2. referred to in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) shall not exceed 200 000 EUR. 3. referred to in paragraph 1 (c) shall not exceed 1 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year for each working day of non-compliance with the obligation pursuant to Article 27 (priority rated orders) calculated from the date established in the decision not exceeding 1% of total turnover in the preceding business year. 4. In fixing the amount of the fine, regard shall be had to the size and economic resources of the economic operator concerned, to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. 5. European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby the Commission has fixed a fine. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed.Article 28 deleted priority rated orders The Commission may, by means of where a representative where an economic operator, where an economic operator, Fines imposed in the cases Fines imposed in the cases The Court of Justice of the
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 877 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29
Limitation period for the imposition of 1. fines in accordance with Article 30 shall be subject to the following limitation periods: (a) infringements of provisions concerning requests of information pursuant to Article 24; (b) infringements of provisions concerning the obligation to prioritise the production of crisis-relevant goods pursuant to Article 26(2). 2. day on which the Commission becomes aware of the infringement. However, in case of continuous or repeated infringements, time shall begin to run on the day on which the infringement ceases 3. Commission or the competent authorities of the Member States for the purposes of ensuring compliance with the provisions of this Regulation shall interrupt the limitation period. 4. period shall apply for all the parties which are held responsible for the participation in the infringement. 5. time running afresh. However, the limitation period shall expire at the latest on the day in which a period equal to twice the limitation period has elapsed without the Commission having imposed a fine. That period shall be extended by the time during which the limitation period is suspended because the decision of the Commission is the subject of proceedings pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union.Article 29 deleted fines The Commission power to impose two years in the case of three years in the case The time shall begin to run on the Any action taken by the The interruption of the limitation Each interruption shall start the
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 882 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30
Limitation periods for enforcement of 1. enforce decisions taken pursuant to Article 28 shall be subject to a limitation period of five years. 2. Time shall begin to run on the day on which the decision becomes final. 3. The limitation period for the enforcement of fines shall be interrupted: (a) by notification of a decision varying the original amount of the fine or refusing an application for variation; (b) or of a Member State, acting at the request of the Commission, designed to enforce payment of the fine. 4. Each interruption shall start time running afresh. 5. enforcement of fines shall be suspended for so long as: (a) (b) enforcement of payment is suspended pursuant to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union.Article 30 deleted fines The power of the Commission to by any action of the Commission The limitation period for the time to pay is allowed;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 886 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31
Right to be heard for the imposition of 1. pursuant to Article 28, the Commission shall give the economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned the opportunity of being heard on: (a) Commission, including any matter to which the Commission has taken objections; (b) may intend to take in view of the preliminary findings pursuant to point (a) of this paragraph. 2. organisations of economic operators concerned may submit their observations to the Commission’s preliminary findings within a time limit which shall be fixed by the Commission in its preliminary findings and which may not be less than 21 days. 3. decisions only on objections on which economic operators and representative organisations of economic operators concerned have been able to comment. 4. economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned shall be fully respected in any proceedings. The economic operator or representative organisations of economic operators concerned shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file under the terms of a negotiated disclosure, subject to the legitimate interest of economic operators in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information and internal documents of the Commission or the authorities of the Member States. In particular, the right of access shall not extend to correspondence between the Commission and the authorities of the Member States. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Commission from disclosing and using information necessary to prove an infringement.Article 31 deleted fines Before adopting a decision preliminary findings of the measures that the Commission Undertakings and representative The Commission shall base its The rights of defence of the
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 895 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
Measures to ensure the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods and services 1. considers that there is a risk of a shortage of crisis-relevant goods, recommend that Member States implement specific measures to ensure the efficient re- organisation of supply chains and production lines and to use existing stocks to increase the availability and supply of crisis-relevant goods and services, as quickly as possible. 2. In particular, the measures referred to in paragraph 1 may include measures: (a) repurposing of existing or the establishment of new production capacities for crisis-relevant goods; (b) existing or the establishment of new capacities related to service activities; (c) of crisis-relevant goods.Article 33 deleted The Commission may, when it facilitating the expansion or facilitating the expansion of aiming at accelerating permitting
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 925 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. Representatives of the Commission or experts nominated by the Commission may carry out on-site visits at the locations of production facilities of relevant goods of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2022/0269(COD)

(22) Before initiating an investigation, competent authorities should request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and value chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the value chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. This Regulation should be subsidiary to Due Diligence processes and be the last resort instrument to be applied when supply chain due diligence has not been properly executed according to applicable international guidelines. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 384 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In their assessment of the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3, competent authorities shall focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the value chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occcausing forced labour and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 406 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall respond to the request of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 3 within 15 30 working days from the day they received such request. Economic operators may provide to competent authorities any other information they may deem useful for the purposes of this Article.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 420 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of time. , aligned with EU and international legislation including the Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDDD) and the UN Guiding Principles on business and human rights, for mitigating, preventing or bringing an end to forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 430 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. Competent authorities shall not initiate an investigation pursuant to Article 5, and shall inform the economic operators under assessment accordingly, where, on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities consider that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of Article 3, for instance due to, but not limited to, the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour referred to in paragraph 3 being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents andor brings to an end the risk of forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 432 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a Burden of evidence Competent authorities shall bear the burden of establishing that forced labour has been used at any stage of production, manufacture, harvest or extraction of a product, including working or processing related to the product on the basis of all information and evidence gathered during the investigation, including its preliminary phase.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 435 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities that, pursuant to Article 4(5), determine that value chain due diligence has not been properly executed according to applicable international guidelines and that therefore there is a substantiated concern of a violation of Article 3, shall decide, as last resort instrument. to initiate an investigation on the products and economic operators concerned.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 471 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall submit the information within 1530 working days from the request referred to in paragraph 3 or make a justified request for an extension of that time limit.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 580 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Economic operators that have been affected by a decision of a competent authority pursuant to this Regulation shall have access to a court to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decision. Economic operators shall be entitled to compensation or damages for the prohibition, withdrawal or destruction of products arising from a wrongful decision by a competent authority.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 626 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise and all relevant stakeholders to provide an indicative, non- exhaustive, verifiableed, solid and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant reliable external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 643 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available by the external expertise at the lateleast 2410 months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 728 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall issue guidelines no later than 180 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, which shall include the following:
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 749 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) further information to facilitate the competent authorities’detailed guidance for competent authorities to garantee homogeneous implementation of this Regulation;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 799 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission mayshall as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 59 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the actions shall be carried out by a consortium of at least threfive Member States;
2023/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. Contractors and subcontractors involved in the common procurement shall be established and have their executive management structures in the Union or in an associated country. They shall not be subject to control by a non- associated third country or by a non- associated third country entity or, alternatively, shall have been subject to screening within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2019/452 and, where necessary, mitigation measures, taking into account the objectives referred to in Article 3.
2023/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. By way of derogation from paragraph 4, a legal entity established in the Union or in an associated third country and controlled by a non-associated third country or a non-associated third country entity may participate asin the common procurement if it provides guarantees verified by the Member State or associated country in which the contractor andor subcontractor involved in the common procurement only if it provides guarantees approved by the Member State or associated thirdis established. The guarantees shall provide assurances that the involvement of the contractor or subcontractor involved in the common procurement does not country in which the contractor is established. avene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States as established in the framework of CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, or the objectives set out in Article 3.
2023/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 9
9. Common procurement procedures and contracts shall also include a requirement for the defence product to not be subject to a restriction by a non- associated third country or a non- associated third country entity directly, or indirectly through one or ore intermediary legal entities, that limits Member States´ ability to use it.
2023/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Certain consumer financial services are governed by specific Union acts, which continue to apply to those financial services. In order to ensure legal certainty, it should be clarified that where another Union act governing specific financial services contains rules on pre-contractual information or on the exercise of the right of withdrawal, only the respective provisions of those other Union acts should apply to those specific consumer financial services with the exception of the relevant provisions of this Directive, unless provided otherwise in those acts. For instance, when Article 186 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council19 applies, the rules concerning the 'cancellation period' laid down in Directive 2009/138/EC apply and not the rules on the right of withdrawal laid down in this Directive and when Article 14(6) of Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council20 applies, the rules on the right of withdrawal under this Directive should not apply. Union acts governing specific financial services should prevail over the rules of this Directive even where these Union acts do not provide for any pre-contractual information or right of withdrawal or adequate information. Likewise, certain Union acts governing specific financial services21 contain extensive and developed rules designed to ensure that consumers are able to understand the essential characteristics of the proposed contract Furthermore, certain Union acts governing specific financial services, such as Directive 2014/17/EU on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property22 , already lay down rules on adequate explanations to be provided by the traders to the consumers with respect to the proposed contract. In order to ensure legal certainty, the rules on adequate explanations set out in this Directive should not apply to financial services falling under Union acts governing specific financial services that contain rules on the information to be provided to the consumer prior to the conclusion of the contract. _________________ 19 Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1). 20 Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34). 21 Such as, Regulation (EU) 2019/1238 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on a pan- European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) (OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 1), Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349), Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (OJ L 26, 2.2.2016, p. 19), Directive 2014/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 214) 22 Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34)
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) The use of means of distance communications should not lead to an unwarranted restriction on the information provided to the consumer. In the interests of transparency, requirements should be laid down with regard to when the information should be provided to the consumer prior to the conclusion of the distance contract and how that information should reach the consumer. In order to be able to make their decisions in full knowledge of the facts, consumers should receive the information at least one day prior to the conclusion of the distance contract. Only in exceptional cases can the information be provided less than a day befin good time priore to the conclusion of the distance contract for financial service. In case the contract is concluded less than one day before, the trader, within the established timeframe, should be obliged to remind the consumer about the possibility to withdraw from the distance contract for financial service.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) For distance contracts concluded by electronic means, the trader shouldmay provide the consumer with the possibility to use a withdrawal button. In order for ensure the effective use of the withdrawal button, the trader should ensure that it is visible and, when the consumer uses the button, the trader should adequately document its use.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
1. BIn good time before the consumer is bound by a distance contract, or any corresponding offer, the trader shall provide the consumer with the following information, in a clear and comprehensible manner:
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 1– point b
(b) the geographical address at which the trader is established as well as the trader’s telephone number andor email address or own digital platform; in addition, where the trader provides other means of online communication which guarantee that the consumer can keep any written correspondence, including the date and time of such correspondence, with the trader on a durable medium, the information shall also include details of those other means; all those means of communication provided by the trader shall enable the consumer to contact the trader quickly and communicate with him efficiently; where applicable, the trader shall also provide the geographical address and identity of the trader on whose behalf he is acting;
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In the case of telephone communications or another means of distance communication initiated by the trader, the identity of the tradlatter and the commercial purpose of the call initiated by the traderommunication shall be made explicitly clear at the beginning of any conversation with the consumer.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the consumer explicitly agrees to continue the telephone communications, by way of derogation from paragraph 1, only the information referred to in points (a), (f), (g), and (p) of that paragraph needs to be provided.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 133 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The trader shall inform the consumer of the nature and the availability of the other information referred to in paragraph 1 and shall provide that information when fulfillingimmediately after the conclusion of the distance contract. For any other means of distance communication, which does not allow for the transmission of the contractual terms and conditions and the information in accordance with paragraph 1, the trader shall fulfil his obligations under that paragraph 3. immediately after the conclusion of the distance contract.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 6
6. Where another Union act governing specific financial services contains rules on the information to be provided to the consumer prior to the conclusion of the contract, oand even if it does not provide for any information to be supplied in this respect, the application of the provisions of Article 16a of this Directive is excluded. Only the pre-contractual information requirements of that Union act shall apply to those specific financial services, unless provided otherwise in that act.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 155 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 –point b
(b) the day on which the consumer receives the contractual terms and conditions and the information in accordance with Article 16a,, provided Article 16a is applicable or other Union act with requirements of pre-contractual information, receives such information if that is later than the date in point (a) of this subparagraph.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2– point a
(a) consumer financial services whose price depends on fluctuations in the financial market outside the traders control, which may occur during the withdrawal period, such as, but not limited to, services related to:
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/83/EU
— foreign exchangeinancial instruments as defined in Annex I, Section C of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments (Mifid II);
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – point a –indent 2
money marpackaged retail and insurance- based investment product’ or ‘PRIIP’, as defined in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on kety instruments; transferable securitiesformation documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs);
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 3
— units in collective investment undertakings;deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 4
— financial-futures contracts, including equivalent cash-settled instruments;deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 6
— interest-rate, currency and equity swaps;deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 7
— options to acquire or dispose of any instruments referred to in this point including equivalent cash-settled instruments. This category includes in particular options on currency and on interest rates;deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 5– subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, for distance contracts concluded by electronic means, the trader provides on-line adequate and comprehensive information aimed at ensuring an easy and conscious withdrawal from the contract, while the trader may provide a possibility to use a withdrawal button in order to facilitate the consumer’s exercise of the right of withdrawal. Such button shall be clearly labelled with the words ‘Withdraw from CIf this withdrawal button is offered by the trader, it shall be clearly labelled “Cancel the contract or a corresponding unambiguous formulationformulation without ambiguity.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
The trader shall ensure that the activation of the withdrawal button results in an instant confirmation notice to the consumer that the right of withdrawal has been exercised, which shall include the date and time of the exercise of the right of withdrawal. Confirmation of the exercise of the right of withdrawal shall be provided by the trader to the consumer on a durable medium.
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2022/0147(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16e
Article 16e Additional protection regarding online interfaces Without prejudice to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council24 and Council Directive 93/13/EEC25 , Member States shall adopt measures requiring that traders, when concluding financial services contracts at a distance, do not use the structure, design, function or manner of operation of their online interface in a way that could distort or impair consumers’ ability to make a free, autonomous and informed decision or choice. _________________ 24 Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to- consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22). 25 Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29).deleted
2023/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The safeguards provided in this Directive should apply to any natural or legal person on account of their engagement in public participation. They should also protect natural or legal persons who, either on a professional or on a personal basis, support, assist or provide goods or services to another person for purposes directly linked to public participation on a matter of public interest. This involves for example internet providers, publishing houses or print shops, which face or are threatened with court proceedings for providing services to the person targeted with court proceedings.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 105 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) This Directive should apply to any type of legal claim or action of a civil or commercial nature with cross-border implications whatever the nature of the court or tribunal. This includes civil claims brought in criminal proceedings. It also includes interim and precautionary measures, counteractions or other particular type of remedies available under other instruments.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 108 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Public participation should mean any statement or activity by a natural or legal person expressed or carried out in any form in exercise of the right to freedom of expression and information on a matter of public interest, such as the creation, exhibition, advertisement or other promotion of journalistic, political, scientific, academic, artistic, commentary or satirical communications, publications or works, and any preparatory activities directly linked theretoor filing of complaints, petitions, claims and participation in public hearings. It can also include activities related to the exercise of the right to freedom of association and peaceful assembly, such as the organisation of or participation to lobbying activities, demonstrations and protests or activities resulting from the exercise ofas well as to the right to good administration and the right to an effective remedy, such as the filing of complaints, petitions, administrative and judicial claims and participation in public hearings. Public participation should also include preparatory, supporting or assisting activities that have a direct and inherent link to the statement or activity in question and that are targeted to stifle public participationaccess to justice. In addition, it can cover other activities meant to inform or influence public opinion or to further action by the public, including activities by any private or public entity in relation to an issue of public interest, such as the organisation of or participation to research, surveys, campaigns or any other collective actions.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 115 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The notion of a matter of public interest should include also quality, safety or other relevant aspects of goods, products or services where such matters are relevant to public health, safety, the environment, climate or enjoyment of fundamental rights. A purely individual dispute between a consumer and a manufacturer or a service provider concerning a good, product or service should not be covered only when the matter contains an element of public interest, for instance concerning a product or service which fails to comply with environmental or safety standards.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 131 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) This Directive shall be considered lex specialis with respect to Regulation 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast).For matters not specifically covered in this Directive, the said Regulation shall apply. A matter should be considered to have cross-border implications unless both parties are domiciled in the same Member State as the court seised. Even where both parties are domiciled in the same Member State as the court seised, a matter should be considered to have cross-border implications in two other types of situations. The first situation i, such as where the specific act of public participation concerning a matter of public interest at stake took place in more than one Member States or it is relevant to more than one Member State. That includes for instance public participation in events organised by Union institutions, such as appearances in public hearings, or statements or activities on matters that are of specific relevance to more than one Member State, such as cross-border pollution or allegations of money laundering with potential cross- border involvement. The second situation where a matter should be considered to have cross-border implications is wWhen the claimant or associated entities have initiated concurrent or previous court proceedings against the same or associated defendants in another Member State involving the same cause of action , the existing relevant rules on Lis pendens and related actions shall apply. These two types of situations take into consideration the specific context of SLAPPs.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) If a defendant has applied for early dismissal, it should be for the claimant in the main proceedings to prove in the accelerated procedure that the claim is not manifestly unfounded. This does not represent a limitation of access to justice, taking into account that the claimant carries the burden of proof in relation to that claim in the main proceedings and only needs to meet the much lower threshold of showing that the claim is not manifestly unfounded in order to avoid an early dismissal.deleted
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 160 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
(34 a) This Directive shall be in any case without prejudice to the recognized function of the national judges to establish, under a case-by-case evaluation performed on factual bases, according to the national civil substantive law and the relevant civil procedural law, whether a judicial action is manifestly abusive or unfounded.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 186 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. ‘public participation’ means any statement or activity by a natural or legal person expressed or carried out in the exercise of the right to freedom of expression and information on a matter of public interest, and preparatory, supporting or assisting action directly linked thereto. This includes complaints, petitions, administrative or judicial claims and participation in public hearings;
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 191 #

2022/0117(COD)

(b) activities of a person or entity in the public eye or of public interest, except whether the sole purpose of a statement or activity concerning such a person or entity is to satisfy the curiosity of a particular audience regarding the details of a person’s private life;
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 206 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
3. ‘abusive court proceedings against public participation’ mean court proceedings brought in relation to public participation that are fully or partially unfounded and have as their main purpose to prevent, restrict or penalize public participation. Indications of such a purpose can bare:
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 231 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the claimant or associated entities have initiated concurrent or previous court proceedings against the same or associated defendants in another Member State.deleted
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 233 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. When the claimant or associated entities have initiated concurrent or previous court proceedings against the same or associated defendants in another Member State involving the same cause of action , the existing relevant rules on Lis pendens and related actions shall apply.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 246 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a court or tribunal seised of court proceedings against public participation may accept that non- governmental organisations safeguarding or promoting the rights of persons engaging in public participation may take part in those proceedings, either in support of the defendant or to provide information, providing that they have a qualified interest in the case under national law.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 276 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12
Member States shall ensure that where a defendant has applied for early dismissal, it shall be for the claimant to prove that the claim is not manifestly unfounded.Article 12 deleted Burden of proof
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 310 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, where abusive court proceedings on account of engagement in public participation have been brought in a court or tribunalIf the grounds for refusal of the recognition and enforcement of a third- country against a natural or legal person domjudgement under Articiled in a Member State, that 17 are met, the interested person may seek, in the courts or tribunals of the place where he is domiciled, compensation of the damages and the costs incurred in connection with the proceedings before the court or tribunal of the third country, irrespective of the domicile of the claimant in the proceedings in the third country.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 316 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19 a Relations with the Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council This Directive shall be considered lex specialis with respect to Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. For matters not specifically covered in this Directive, the said Regulation shall apply.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 332 #

2022/0117(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The Commission shall exempt a Member State from transposing this Directive where the Member State concerned demonstrates that the existing national legislation at the time of the entry into force of the Directive already achieves the objectives set out therein.To this end, the Member State shall transmit a communication to the Commission within one year of the entry into force of this Directive. Member States may, in any event, introduce or mantain more favourable provisions than the guarantees provided for in this Directive against manifestly unfounded and abusive legal proceedings in civil matters.
2023/04/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 118 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) For many years, geographical indication protection has been established at Union level for wines, spirit drinks6 , aromatised wines7 , as defined at Union level, as well as agricultural products and foodstuffs8 , as protected at Union level. It is appropriate to provide Union-wide geographical indication protection in respect of products falling outside the scope of existing regulations, while ensuring convergence, and aiming at encompassing a large variety of craft and industrial products, such as natural stones, jewellery, textiles, lace, cutlery, glass and porcelain. For most of these products, the link between quality and origin is provided by the tradition of production, so it is appropriate that this regulation can protect geographical names that coincide with the names of specific places or regions where the tradition of production in question is present in a known and established way. __________________ 6 Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1). 7 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347 20.12.2013, p. 671). 8 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Member States should have the possibility to charge a registration fee to cover their costs of managing the geographical indication system for craft and industrial products. Member States should charge lower fees for micro, small or medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The Office should not charge a fee for the management of the Union application process. However, the Office should have the possibility to charge a fee for the direct registration. In that case, the fees charged by the Office should be laid down by an implementing act in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 . __________________ 14 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To qualify for protection in the Member States, geographical indications should be registered only at Union level. However, with effect from the date of application for such registration at Union level, Member States should be able to grant temporary protection at national level without affecting the internal market of the Union or international trade. The protection afforded by this Regulation upon registration should be equally available to geographical indications of third countries that meet the corresponding criteria and that are protected in their country of origin. The Office should carry out the corresponding procedures for geographical indications originating in third countries.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The procedures for registration, amendments to the product specification and cancellation of the registration in respect of geographical indications originating in the Union under this Regulation should be carried out by the Member States and the Office. The Member States and the Office should be responsible for distinct stages of the procedures. Member States should be responsible for the first stage, which consists of receiving the application from the applicants, assessing it, running the national opposition procedure, and, following the positive results of the assessment, submitting the Union application to the Office. The Office should be responsible for examining the applications in the second stage of the procedure, running the worldwide opposition procedure at the European level and taking a decision on granting or refusing the protection to the geographical indication. The Office should also carry out the corresponding procedures for geographical indications originating in third countries, without prejudice to the direct registration procedure.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) It is possible for certain Member States to obtain a derogation from the Member States’ obligation to designate a national authority in respect of geographical indications for craft and industrial products to take charge of the procedures for registration, national opposition, amendments to the product specification and cancellation of the registration under certain circumstances specified in this Regulation. That derogation, that should take the form of a Commission Decision, takes into account the fact that certain Member States do not have a specific national system for the management of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and that the local interest in these countries to protect these geographical indications is minimal. Under these circumstances, it would not be justified to oblige the respective Member State to set up an infrastructure, employ the necessary personnel and purchase facilities for the management of these geographical indications. It is more effective and economical to provide an alternative procedure for the producer groups from these Member States to protect their products by a geographical indication. The “direct registration procedure” has cost advantages reaped by Member States. Pursuant to this derogation, procedures for registration, amendments to the product specification and cancellation should be managed directly by the Office. In this regard the Office should receive the effective assistance of the administrative authorities of that Member State when required by the Office, through designation of a contact point, as regards in particular aspects related to the examination of the application. In those cases, the Office should be entitled to charge a registration fee, considering that this procedure generates more work for the Office than the management of Union applications. However, the application of the “direct registration procedure” should not exempt Member States from the obligation to designate a competent authority for the controls and enforcement and to take the necessary actions to enforce the rights set out in this Regulation. The competent authority maintained or designated for the management of the geographical indications and the competent authority designated for the controls and enforcement may differ, when a Member State so decides.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should have the right to take over from the Office the power to decide concerning individual applications for registration, amendments to the product specification or cancellation. The Office should remain responsible for the examination of the file, the opposition procedure, when needed, and based on technical considerations, it shall submit a proposal for an implementing act to the Commission. Any Member State or the Office may request the Commission to exercise this prerogative. The Commission may also act on its own initiative.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The use of Union symbols and indications on the packaging of craft and industrial products designated by a geographical indication should be recommended in order to make this category of products, and the guarantees attached to them, better known to consumers and to permit easier identification of these products on the market, thereby facilitating checks. The use of such symbols or indications should remain voluntary for third-country geographical indications.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) For many years, geographical indication protection has been established at Union level for wines, spirit drinks6 , aromatised wines7 , as defined at Union level, as well as agricultural products and foodstuffs8 , as protected at Union level. It is appropriate to provide Union-wide geographical indication protection in respect of products falling outside the scope of existing regulations, while ensuring convergence, and aiming at encompassing a large variety of craft and industrial products, such as natural stones, jewellery, textiles, lace, cutlery, glass and porcelain. For most of these products, the link between quality and origin is provided by the tradition of production, so it is appropriate that this regulation can protect geographical names that coincide with the names of specific places or regions where the tradition of production in question is present in a known and established way. _________________ 6 Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1). 7 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347 20.12.2013, p. 671). 8 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 156 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the registration, protection, control and enforcement of certain names that identify craft and industrial products with given quality, reputation or other characteristics linked to their geographical origin and,
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to craft and industrialnon- agricultural and non-food products listed under the combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/8724 Products covered by Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council are also excluded from the scope of this Regulation. __________________ 24 Council Regulation (EEC) N0 2685/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff Regulation (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987 p.1)
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Member States should have the possibility to charge a registration fee to cover their costs of managing the geographical indication system for craft and industrial products. Member States should charge lower fees for micro, small or medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The Office should not charge a fee for the management of the Union application process. However, the Office should have the possibility to charge a fee for the direct registration. In that case, the fees charged by the Office should be laid down by an implementing act in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 . _________________ 14 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 163 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To qualify for protection in the Member States, geographical indications should be registered only at Union level. However, with effect from the date of application for such registration at Union level, Member States should be able to grant temporary protection at national level without affecting the internal market of the Union or international trade. The protection afforded by this Regulation upon registration should be equally available to geographical indications of third countries that meet the corresponding criteria and that are protected in their country of origin. The Office should carry out the corresponding procedures for geographical indications originating in third countries.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 163 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation does not apply to spirit drinks as referred in Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , wines as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , nor to agricultural products and foodstuffs as protected by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . __________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1). 26 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347 20.12.2013, p. 671). 27 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The procedures for registration, amendments to the product specification and cancellation of the registration in respect of geographical indications originating in the Union under this Regulation should be carried out by the Member States and the Office. The Member States and the Office should be responsible for distinct stages of the procedures. Member States should be responsible for the first stage, which consists of receiving the application from the applicants, assessing it, running the national opposition procedure, and, following the positive results of the assessment, submitting the Union application to the Office. The Office should be responsible for examining the applications in the second stage of the procedure, running the worldwide opposition procedure at the European level and taking a decision on granting or refusing the protection to the geographical indication. The Office should also carry out the corresponding procedures for geographical indications originating in third countries, without prejudice to the direct registration procedure.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 168 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘craft products’ means products produced either totally by hand ormade by undertakings that national law defines as artisan, with the aid of manual tools or by mechanical means, whenever or digital means, including withe direct manual contribution is the mostinput during the production process which constitutes an important component of the finished product;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) It is possible for certain Member States to obtain a derogation from the Member States’ obligation to designate a national authority in respect of geographical indications for craft and industrial products to take charge of the procedures for registration, national opposition, amendments to the product specification and cancellation of the registration under certain circumstances specified in this Regulation. That derogation, that should take the form of a Commission Decision, takes into account the fact that certain Member States do not have a specific national system for the management of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and that the local interest in these countries to protect these geographical indications is minimal. Under these circumstances, it would not be justified to oblige the respective Member State to set up an infrastructure, employ the necessary personnel and purchase facilities for the management of these geographical indications. It is more effective and economical to provide an alternative procedure for the producer groups from these Member States to protect their products by a geographical indication. The “direct registration procedure” has cost advantages reaped by Member States. Pursuant to this derogation, procedures for registration, amendments to the product specification and cancellation should be managed directly by the Office. In this regard the Office should receive the effective assistance of the administrative authorities of that Member State when required by the Office, through designation of a contact point, as regards in particular aspects related to the examination of the application. In those cases, the Office should be entitled to charge a registration fee, considering that this procedure generates more work for the Office than the management of Union applications. However, the application of the “direct registration procedure” should not exempt Member States from the obligation to designate a competent authority for the controls and enforcement and to take the necessary actions to enforce the rights set out in this Regulation. The competent authority maintained or designated for the management of the geographical indications and the competent authority designated for the controls and enforcement may differ, when a Member State so decides.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 176 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should have the right to take over from the Office the power to decide concerning individual applications for registration, amendments to the product specification or cancellation. The Office should remain responsible for the examination of the file, the opposition procedure, when needed, and based on technical considerations, it shall submit a proposal for an implementing act to the Commission. Any Member State or the Office may request the Commission to exercise this prerogative. The Commission may also act on its own initiative.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 176 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘producer group’ means any association, irrespective of its legal form, mainly composed of producers or processors, manufacturers, processors or any other operator working with the same product;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The Union negotiates international agreements, including those concerning the protection geographical indications, with its trade partners. Protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products throughout the Union can also stem from those agreements, irrespective of or from the international registrations provided under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications or the application and registration system set out in this Regulation. This Regulation makes the necessary changes to EU legislation concerning the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement, in order to adapt the existing rules to the new system of protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products. In order to facilitate the provision to the public of information about the geographical indications protected in the Union either by virtue of the international registrations provided under the Geneva Act or by virtue of the international agreements with the Union trade partners, and in particular to ensure protection and control of the use to which those geographical indications are put, those geographical indications should be entered in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 181 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘traditional’ and 'tradition', when associated with a product originating in a geographical area, means proven historical usage by producers in a professional community for a period that allows transmission between generations;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) 'producer' means an operator engaged in anyone or more production step of a product the name of which is protected as a geographical indication, including processing activities, covered by the product specification;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h – point i
(i) the common names of products in the Union or the names of products which, although relating to the place, region or country where the product was originally produced or marketed, have become the common name of a product in the Union or do not have a given quality, reputation or other characteristics traditionally linked to their geographical origin;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
(ii) a common term descriptive of the type of product, or product attributes or other terms that do not refer to specific product;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) In order to avoid creating unfair conditions for competition, any producer, including an interested third-country producer, should be able to use a registered geographical indication, provided that the product concerned complies with the requirements of the relevant product specification, or single document or equivalent to the latter i.e. a complete summary of the product specification. The system set up by the Member States should also guarantee that producers complying with the rules are covered by the verification of compliance of the product specification.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The use of Union symbols and indications on the packaging of craft and industrial products designated by a geographical indication should be recommended in order to make this category of products, and the guarantees attached to them, better known to consumers and to permit easier identification of these products on the market, thereby facilitating checks. The use of such symbols or indications should remain voluntary for third-country geographical indications.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
For the name of a craft andor industrial product to qualify for “geographical indication” protection, the product shall comply with the following requirements:
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. An authority designated by a Member State may be deemed to be an applicant producer group for the purposes of this Title, if it is not feasible for the producers concerned to form a group by reason of their number, geographical location or organisational characteristics. Where such representation takes place, the application referred to in Article 11(3) shall state these reasons for such representation.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 203 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. A single producer may be deemed to be an applicant producer group for the purposes of this Title, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: if the person concerned is the only producer willing to submit an application for the registration of a geographical indication.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the person concerned is the only producer willing to submit an application for the registration of a geographical indication;deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 205 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the geographical area concerned is defined by natural features without reference to property boundaries and has characteristics which differ appreciably from those of neighbouring areas or the characteristics of the product are different from those produced in neighbouring areas.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. In the case of a geographical indication that designates a cross-border geographical area, producer groups from different Member States may lodge a joint application for the registration of a geographical indication from either Member State. When the cross-border geographical area concerns a Member State and a third country, they may lodge a joint application for registration with the national authority of the Member State concerned. When the cross-border geographical area concerns several third countries, several producer groups may lodge a joint application with the Office.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 210 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Craft and industrial products the names of which are registered as a geographical indication shall comply with a product specification, which shall include at least:
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the name to be protected as geographical indication which may be either a geographical name of the place of production of a specific product, or a name used in trade or in common language to describe the specific product in the defined geographical area or both;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a The exclusive system of geographical indications outlined in this Regulation, which protects the names of craft and industrial products with given quality, reputation or other characteristics linked to their geographical origin, guarantees: (a) an efficient registration procedure for geographical indications, taking into account the adequate protection of intellectual property rights, for the valorisation and protection of know-how, the link with the territory and its craft tradition; (b) collective action by producers, with the necessary powers and responsibilities to manage the relevant geographical indication; (c) fair competition between producers in the commercial chain; d) the reliability of information and the guarantee of authenticity of products for their easy and immediate identification on the market and in online commerce, to safeguard consumers.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 216 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to craft and industrialnon- agricultural and non-food products listed under the combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.24 Products covered by Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council are also excluded from the scope of this Regulation. _________________ 24 Council Regulation (EEC) N0 2685/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff Regulation (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987 p.1)
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 219 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation does not apply to spirit drinks as referred in Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , wines as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , nor to agricultural products and foodstuffs as protected by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . _________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1). 26 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347 20.12.2013, p. 671). 27 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 225 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘craft products’ means products produced either totally by hand ormade by enterprises that national law defines as artisan, with the aid of mhanuald tools or by, mechanical means, whenever or digital means, including withe direct manual contribution is the mostinput during the production process, which constitutes an important component of the finished product;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 227 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i a (new)
(ia) the type of products;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii a (new)
(iia) a description of the method of producing or obtaining the product, where appropriate, the traditional method and specific practices used;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 232 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts supplementing this Regulation by provisions clarifying the requirements or listing additional items of the accompanying documentation to be supplied.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘producer group’ means any association, irrespective of its legal form, mainly composed of producers or processors, manufacturers, processors or any other operator working with the same product;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 233 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may charge a fee to cover the costs of managing the geographical indication system for craft and industrial products provided for in this Regulation, including those incurred in processing applications, statements of opposition, applications for amendments and requests for cancellations.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘production step’ means any stage of production, processing or preparation, as illustrated in the product specification of the relevant geographical indication product, up to the point, where the product is in a form to be placed on the internal market;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 236 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where a Member State charges a fee, for the administrative costs of filing applications the level of the fees shall be reasonable, foster the competitiveness of the producers of the geographical indications and shall take into account the situation of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, enabling them full access to the protection of geographical indications and the safeguarding of their intellectual property rights.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 240 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation to paragraph 3 of this Article, the Office shall charge a fee in the direct registration procedure referred to in Article 15, in the procedure referred to in Article 17(3) and for the appeals before the Boards of Appeal referred to in Article 30. Fees may be charged also for the amendment of the product specification and cancellation if the procedure concerns a name that was registered under Article 15 or Article 17(3).deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to determine the amounts of the fees charged by the Office and the ways in which they are to be paid or, in case of the fee for appeals before the Boards of Appeal, reimbursed. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2).deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 243 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘traditional’ and 'tradition', when associated with a product originating in a geographical area, means proven historical usage by producers in a professional community for a period that allows transmission between generations;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 245 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. TIn the case of geographical indication that designates a cross-border geographical area, two or more Member States may agree that the competent authority of one Member State is in charge of the national phase of the registration and other procedures, including the submission of the Union application to the Office, also on behalf of the other Member State, or Member States.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) 'producer' means an operator engaged in anyone or more production step of a product the name of which is protected as a geographical indication, including processing activities, covered by the product specification;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 248 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h – point i
(i) the common names of products in the Union or the names of products which, although relating to the place, region or country where the product was originally produced or marketed, have become the common name of a product in the Union ordo not have a given quality, reputation or other characteristics traditionally linked to their geographical origin;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 248 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
The competent authority shall examine the application and shall check that the product complies with the requirements for geographical indications referred to in Article 5 and provides the necessary information for registration referred to in Articles 7, 8 and 9. The competent authority shall, where appropriate, enter into consultation with the most representative local, regional or national sector associations to obtain their opinion.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 250 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
(ii) a common term descriptive of the type of product, or product attributes or other terms that do not refer to specific product;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 251 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) ‘product certification body’ means a legal persbody accredited by the national government authority and notified to the European Commission which certifies that products designated by geographical indications comply with the product specification, whether in performance of a delegated official control task or any other mandate;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 252 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall establish the detailed arrangements of the opposition procedure. Those detailed arrangements may include criteria for the admissibility of an opposition, a period of consultation between the applicant and each national opponent, and submission of a report from the applicant on the outcome of the consultations including any changes the applicant has made to the application. When the national opposition procedure is concluded, the competent authority shall draw up and publish a report.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 254 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) "expert in the field" means a person with proven knowledge and experience in the sector who makes available his or her technical expertise in a specific subject matter.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 258 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ‘self-declaration’ means a documentstandardised form in which a producer, or an authorised representative, indicates on his or her sole responsibility that the product is compliant with the corresponding product specification and that all necessary controls and checks for the proper determination of conformity have been carried out in order to demonstrate the lawful right of use of the geographical indication to the competent authorities of Member States.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 264 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
For the name of a craft andor industrial product to qualify for “geographical indication” protection, the product shall comply with the following requirements:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 265 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) The product originates in a specific place, well defined region or country;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 267 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) at least one of the qualifying production steps of the product takes place in the defined geographical area. The qualifying production step shall be understood, as per the product specification, as the step where the product is given the particular characteristics attributable to its geographical origin.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 269 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. For geographical indications concerning products originating in a third country or countries the application for registration is submittdeleted the product specification referred the single document referred to in the Office, such application for registration shall comprise: (a) to in Article 7 together with its publication reference; (b) Article 8; (c) referred to in Article 9; (d) geographical indication in its country of origin; (e) applicant is represented by an agent.accompanying documentation legal proof of protection of the a power of attorney where the
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. A joint application for registration referred to in Article 6(4) shall be submitted to the Office by one of the Member States concerned or by the applicant producer group in a third country, directly or by the competent authority of that third country. If the cross- border area concerns any Member State and a third country, the joint application shall be submitted by the Member State concerned.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. The joint application referred to in Article 6(4) shall include, where relevant, the documents listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, from the Member States or third countries, in case of a cross-border geographical area with one or more non-EU countries, from a third country concerned. The related national procedure for application, the examination and opposition procedure referred to in Articles 11, 12 and 13 shall be carried out in all the Member States and from a third countriesy concerned.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 276 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts defining procedures and conditions applicable to the preparation and submission of Union applications for registration.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 277 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. An authority designated by a Member State may be deemed to be an applicant producer group for the purposes of this Title, if it is not feasible for the producers concerned to form a group by reason of their number, geographical location or organisational characteristics. Where such representation takes place, the application referred to in Article 11(3) shall state these reasons for such representation.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 277 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Where the application for registration relates to a geographical area in a third country, the application shall be submitted to the Office, either directly by the applicant producer group or by the competent authority of the third country concerned. The digital system, referred to in paragraph 1, shall have capacity to allow the submission of those applications by an applicant producer group established in a third country and by the competent authorities in the third country concerned. The applicant producer group and the competent authorities of the third country concerned shall be considered a party to the procedure.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 279 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Office may seek supplementary information from the Member State concerned. If the application is lodged by a producer group from a third country or by the competent authority of a third country, such producer group or competent authority shall provide supplementary information where requested to do so by the Office.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. Where, based on the examination carried out pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office finds that the application is incomplete or incorrect, the Office shall send its observations to the Member State or in case of third country applications, to the relevant producer group or competent authority that has submitted the Union application, from where that application originates and request to complete or to correct the application within 60 days. If the Member State, or in case of third country applications, the relevant producer group or competent authority, does not complete the application within the deadline, the application shall be considered to be withdrawn, or if not corrected, it shall be rejected pursuant to Article 24(2).
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. A single producer may be deemed to be an applicant producer group for the purposes of this Title, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: if the person concerned is the only producer willing to submit an application for the registration of a geographical indication.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 284 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the person concerned is the only producer willing to submit an application for the registration of a geographical indication;deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 285 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the geographical area concerned is defined by natural features without reference to property boundaries and has characteristics which differ appreciably from those of neighbouring areas or the characteristics of the product are different from those produced in neighbouring areas.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 289 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. In the case of a geographical indication that designates a cross-border geographical area, producer groups from different Member States may lodge a joint application for the registration of a geographical indication from either Member State. When the cross-border geographical area concerns a Member State and a third country, they may lodge a joint application for registration with the national authority of the Member State concerned. When the cross-border geographical area concerns several third countries, several producer groups may lodge a joint application with the Office.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 289 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The Office may decide to extend the transitional period granted under paragraph 1 up to 15 years, or allowing continued use for up to 15 years, provided it is additionally shown that: (a) referred to in paragraph 1 has been in legal use consistently and fairly for at least 25 years before the application for registration of the concerned geographical indication was submitted to the Office; (b) the designation referred to in paragraph (1) has not, at any time, been to profit from the reputation of the name of the product that has been registered as geographical indication; and (c) the consumer has not been or could not have been misled as to the true origin of the product.deleted the name in the designation the purpose of using the name in
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 292 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 6
6. Paragraph 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a geographical indication referring to a cross-border geographical area swituated inh a third country, with the exception of the opposition procedure.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Craft and industrial products the names of which are registered as a geographical indication shall comply with a product specification, which shall include at least:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the name to be protected as geographical indication which may be either a geographical name of the place of production of a specific product, or a name used in trade or in common language to describe the specific product in the defined geographical area or both;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25
Decision by the Commission 1. registration referred to in Article 17, the Commission may take over from the Office, at any time before the end of the procedure, on its own initiative, on the initiative of a Member State or the Office, the power to decide on the application for registration of the proposed geographical indication where such decision may jeopardise the public interest or the Union’s trade or external relations. The Office shall submit a proposal to the Commission for a decision pursuant to Article 24(2) to 24(6). The Commission shall adopt the final act on the application for registration. This paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation and the amendment of the product specification. 2. paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts on the protection of the geographical indication. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2) and shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products. 3. Commission has access to the documents concerning the applications for registration, any amendment of the product specification and cancellation through the digital system referred to in Article 18(1) and Article 26(1).Article 25 deleted Concerning applications for In situations referred to in The Office shall ensure that the
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 303 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) the name and contact details of the competent authority and/or product certification body responsible for verifying the compliance with the provisions of the product specification.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 305 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The elements contained in the product specification shall, in any case, be objective, reasonable and non- discriminatory.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 306 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Union amendments shall be approved by the Office or, where Article 25 applies, the Commission. The approval procedure shall follow mutatis mutandis the procedure and publication requirements laid down in Articles 6 to 254.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 307 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 8
8. Standard amendments shall be approved by Member States or third countries in whose territory the geographical area of the product concerned is located. Such amendments shall be communicated to the Office. Where Article 25 applies, the Office shall approve the standard amendments. The Office shall make those amendments public in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Office may, own its own initiative or on a duly substantiated request by a Member State, a third country or any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, decide to cancel the registration of a geographical indication in the following cases:
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2022/0115(COD)

(ia) the type of product;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 313 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Article 6 and Articles 19 to 254 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation procedure.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
4. Before deciding to cancel the registration of a geographical indication, the Office shall consult the competent authority of the Member State, the competent authorities of the third country or,or where possible, the third country producer group which had applied for the registration of the geographical indication concerned, unless the cancellation is directly requested by the original applicants. Any natural person affected by the cancellation of the registration of a geographical indication may submit observations during the cancellation procedure. If the geographical indication was registered pursuant to Article 15, the Office shall consult the Advisory Board referred to in Article 33.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 317 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii a (new)
(iia) a description of the method of producing or obtaining the product and, where appropriate, the traditional methods and specific practices used;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 324 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts supplementing this Regulation by provisions clarifying the requirements or listing additional items of the accompanying documentation to be supplied.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 325 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may charge a fee to cover the costs of managing the geographical indication system for craft and industrial products provided for in this Regulation, including those incurred in processing applications, statements of opposition, applications for amendments and requests for cancellations.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 326 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Geographical indications entered in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and geographical indications protected under an international agreement within the Union shall be protected against:
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where a Member State charges a fee for the administrative costs of filing applications , the level of the fees shall be reasonable, foster the competitiveness of the producers of the geographical indications and shall take into account the situation of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, enabling them full access to the protection of geographical indications and the safeguarding of their intellectual property rights.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 328 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) any direct or indirect commercial use of the geographical indication in respect of products not covered by the registration, where those products are identical or similar to the products registered under that geographical indication or where use of the name exploits, weakens, dilutes, or is detrimental to the reputation of, the protected geographical indication even if these products are parts or components of manufactured products;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation to paragraph 3 of this Article, the Office shall charge a fee in the direct registration procedure referred to in Article 15, in the procedure referred to in Article 17(3) and for the appeals before the Boards of Appeal referred to in Article 30. Fees may be charged also for the amendment of the product specification and cancellation if the procedure concerns a name that was registered under Article 15 or Article 17(3).deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 331 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) any misuse, counterfeiting, imitation or evocation, even if the true origin of the products or services is indicated or if the protected geographical indication is translated or accompanied by an expression such as ‘style’, ‘type’, ‘method’, ‘as produced in’, ‘imitation’, ‘flavour’, ‘like’ or similar, even if these products are parts or components of manufactured products;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to determine the amounts of the fees charged by the Office and the ways in which they are to be paid or, in case of the fee for appeals before the Boards of Appeal, reimbursed. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2).deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 334 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, point (b), the evocation of a geographical indication shall be deemed to arise, in particular, where a term, sign, or other labelling or packaging device presents a direct and clear linkclear link is present with the product covered by the registered geographical indication in the mind of the reasonably circumspect consumer, thereby exploiting, weakening, diluting or being detrimental to the reputation of the registered name.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 336 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
5. The producer group or any producer that is entitled to usethe holder of the protected geographical indication shall be entitled to prevent all third parties from bringing goods, in the course of trade, into the Union without being released for free circulation there, where such goods, including packaging, come from third countries and are contrary to paragraph 1.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
The competent authority shall examine the application and shall check that the product complies with the requirements for geographical indications referred to in Article 5 and provides the necessary information and proofs for registration referred to in Articles 7, 8 and 9. The competent authority shall, where appropriate, enter into consultation with the most representative local, regional or national sector associations to obtain their opinion.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 339 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall establish the detailed arrangements of the opposition procedure. Those detailed arrangements may include criteria for the admissibility of an opposition, a period of consultation between the applicant and each national opponent, and submission of a report from the applicant on the outcome of the consultations including any changes the applicant has made to the application. When the national opposition procedure is concluded, the competent authority shall draw up and publish a report.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 340 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. If the competent authority, after the examination of the application and the assessment of the results of any oppositions received, and any changes to the application agreed with the applicant, finds that the requirements of this Regulation are met, it shall take a favourable decision by a deadline to be determined by national legislation and lodge a Union application for registration in accordance with Article 17.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 342 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. Generic terms not associated with names of a specific place, region or country shall not be registered as a geographical indication.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 343 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. To establish whether or not a term has become generic, account shall be takendeleted the existing situation in areas of allthe relevant factors, in particular: (a) consumption; (b) legal acts.Union or national
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 345 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39
A name shall not be registered as a geographical indication where, in the light of a trade mark’s reputation and renown, registration of the name proposed as a geographical indication could mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product.rticle 39 deleted Trade marks
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 347 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. Member States or the Office, when Article 15 applies, shall verify that the producer group operates in a transparent and democratic manner and that all producers of the product designated by the geographical indication enjoy right of membership in the group. Member States may provide that public officials, and other stakeholders such as consumer groups, retailers and suppliers, also participate in the work of the producer group.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 349 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) develop and amend the product specification and manage internal controls that ensure compliance of production steps of product designated by the geographical indication with that specification;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 352 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) take legal action to ensure the protection of the geographical indication and of the intellectual property rights that are directly connected with it and prevent and counteract any measures that are or risk being detrimental to the image of their products;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 353 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) agree sustainability undertakings, whether or not included in the product specification or as a separate initiative, including arrangements for verification of compliance with these undertakings and assuring adequate publicity for them in particular in an information system provided by the Commission;
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 355 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v
(v) providing advice and training to current and future producers, including on gender mainstreaming and equality; and
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2
2. The Office and, when applicable, the competent national authorities shall invalidate ex officio trade marks registered in breach of paragraph 1.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 359 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. For geographical indications concerning products originating in a third country or countries the application for registration is submitted to the Office, such application for registration shall comprise: (a) the product specification referred to in Article 7 together with its publication reference; (b) the single document referred to in Article 8; (c) the accompanying documentation referred to in Article 9; (d) legal proof of protection of the geographical indication in its country of origin; (e) a power of attorney where the applicant is represented by an agent.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 360 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, a trade mark the use of which contravenes Article 35, which has been applied for, registered, or established by use in good faith within the territory of the Union, if that possibility is provided for by the legislation concerned, or protected within the territory of the Union before the date on which the application for registration of the geographical indication is submitted to the Office, may continue to be used and reneweduntil the expiry of the trade mark registration, notwithstanding the registration of a geographical indication, provided that no grounds for invalidity or revocation of the trade mark exist under Directive (EU) 2015/243632 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. In such cases, the use of the geographical indication and that of the relevant trade mark shall be permitted. After the expiry of the trade mark registration, products so labelled may be marketed until the stocks are exhausted. __________________ 32 Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ L 336, 23.12.2015, p. 1).
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 361 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. A registered geographical indication may be used by any producer marketing a product conforming to the corresponding product specification or to a single document or an equivalent to the latter.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 362 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. A joint application for registration referred to in Article 6(4) shall be submitted to the Office by one of the Member States concerned or by the applicant producer group in a third country, directly or by the competent authority of that third country. If the cross- border area concerns any Member State and a third country, the joint application shall be submitted by the Member State concerned.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 363 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. The joint application referred to in Article 6(4) shall include, where relevant, the documents listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, from the Member States or third countries, in case of a cross-border geographical area with one or more non-EU countries, from a third country concerned. The related national procedure for application, the examination and opposition procedure referred to in Articles 11, 12 and 13 shall be carried out in all the Member States and from a third countriesy concerned.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 364 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. In the case of craft and industrial products originating in the Union that are marketed under a geographical indication, the Union symbol referred to in paragraph 1 mayshall appear on the labelling and advertising material. The geographical indication shall be in the same field of vision as the Union symbol.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 365 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts defining procedures and conditions applicable to the preparation and submission of Union applications for registration.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 365 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3
3. The abbreviation ‘PGI’ corresponding to the indication ‘protected geographical indication’ mayshall appear on the labelling of products designated by a geographical indication of craft and industrial products and, where applicable, on the advertising material.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Where the application for registration relates to a geographical area in a third country, the application shall be submitted to the Office, either directly by the applicant producer group or by the competent authority of the third country concerned. The digital system, referred to in paragraph 1, shall have capacity to allow the submission of those applications by an applicant producer group established in a third country and by the competent authorities in the third country concerned. The applicant producer group and the competent authorities of the third country concerned shall be considered a party to the procedure.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 367 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 5
5. After the submission of a Union application for the registration of a geographical indication, producers may indicate on the labelling, and in the presentation, of the product that an application has been filed in compliance with Union law.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 369 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6
6. The Union symbol indicating the protected geographical indication and the Union indication ‘protected geographical indication’ and the abbreviation ‘PGI’ as relevant, may appear on the labelling and, where applicable, on advertising material only after the publication of the decision on registration in accordance with Articles 24 and 25.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 370 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Office may seek supplementary information from the Member State concerned. If the application is lodged by a producer group from a third country or by the competent authority of a third country, such producer group or competent authority shall provide supplementary information where requested to do so by the Office.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 370 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 7
7. Where an application is rejected, any products labelled in accordance with paragraph 4 may be marketed until the stocks are exhausted.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 371 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. TIn order not to mislead the reasonably cautious consumer as to the origin of the products, the following mayshall also appear on the labelling:
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 372 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. Where, based on the examination carried out pursuant to paragraph 1, the Office finds that the application is incomplete or incorrect, the Office shall send its observations to the Member State or in case of third country applications, to the relevant producer group or competent authority that has submitted the Union application, from where that application originates and request to complete or to correct the application within 60 days. If the Member State, or in case of third country applications, the relevant producer group or competent authority, does not complete the application within the deadline, the application shall be considered to be withdrawn, or if not corrected, it shall be rejected pursuant to Article 24(2).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 372 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) depictions of the geographical area of origin, as referred to in the product specification; and
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 373 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) text, graphics or symbolindication of the country of origin of the product ("Made in [country of origin]") and emblems or flags referring to the Member State or the region in which that geographical area of origin is located.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 374 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Where the size or nature of the product does not allow for the indications in (a) and (b), such information shall be provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the product.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 375 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 9
9. The Union symbol associated with a geographical indication entered in the Union Register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products designating craft and industrial product originating in third countries, may appear on the product labelling and advertising material, in which case the symbol shall be used in conformity with paragraph 2.deleted
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 378 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Office shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the deadline to perform the examination laid down in Article 19(2) and, while still having to inform the applicant of the reasons for the delay, where it receives a communication from a Member State, concerning an application for registration in accordance with Article 14(1), which:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 378 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 4
4. In respect of geographical indications that designate products originating indeleted a public competent a uthird country, the verification of compliance with the specifications before placing the product on the market shall be carried out by : (a) designated by the third country; or (b) bodies.ority one or more product certification
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 6
6. The costs of verification of compliance with the product specification may be borne by the producers, which are subject to those controls. Member States may also contribute to those costs, in particular for micro, small, medium-sized enterprises.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 382 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – title
Opposition and comments procedure
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 383 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2
2. The enforcement authority shall carry out controls, based on a risk analysis and notifications of interested producers of products designated by geographical indications, to ensure conformity with the product specification or the single document or an equivalent to the latter.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 385 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Within 3 months from the date of publication of the single document and the reference to the product specification referred to in Article 7 in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products an opponent may lodge an opposition or notice of comment with the Office. The applicant and the opponent shall be considered a party to the procedure.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 386 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. An opponent may be the competent authorities of a Member State, or of a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4), or a natural or legal person having legitimate interest and established or resident in a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4) or in another Member State that does not qualify as a national opponent pursuant to Article 13(1).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 386 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. As provided for in Article 47(c), applicant producer groups as referred to in Article 6, which obtained the registration of the geographical indication, shall be entitled to notify the authorities designated pursuant to paragraph 1 in order for them to carry out checks as provided for in this Title. In such cases, upon request by the associations, the authorities shall provide information on the progress of the process initiated by such notification.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 387 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. The Office shall check the admissibility of the opposition, taking into account the grounds of opposition under Article 22. If the Office considers that the opposition is admissible, it shall, within 60 days after the receipt of that opposition, invite the opponent and the applicant to engage in consultations for a reasonable period not exceeding 3 months. At any time during that period, the Office may, at the request of either party, extend the time limit for the consultations by a maximum of 3 months. The Office may offer mediation for the consultations between the applicant and the opponent pursuant to Article 170 of Regulation (EU) 2017(1001).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 391 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 6
6. Within 1 month from the end of the consultations referred to in paragraph 2, the applicant established in the third country or the competent authority of the Member State or of the third country from which the application for Union registration was lodged shall notify the Office of the result of the consultations, whether an agreement was reached with one or all of the opponents, and of any consequent changes to the application made by that applicant. The opponent may also notify the Office of its position at the end of the consultations.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 394 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 8
8. The authorities and persons that may act as an opponent may lodge a notice of comment with the Office. The competent authority or person that lodged a notice of comment shall not be considered to be a party to the procedure.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 9
9. The Office may share the notice of comment with the applicant and the opponent.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Regulation (EU)2019/1753
Article 7 – paragraph 2
In respect of craft and industrial geographical indications, the decision whether to grant protection shall be adopted by the Office, or, in cases referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2022/…, by the Commission.. The related implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 398 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 10
10. In order to facilitate the official submission of comments and to improve management of the opposition procedure, the Commission may adopt implementing acts laying down the necessary rules to provide for the submission of such official comments and specifying the format anddefine the format of the online presentation of oppositions and any commentsthe procedure. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 399 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 3
3. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 17 to 254, the Office or, in cases referred to in Article 25, the Commission shall register the names referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, which comply with Articles 2, 5, 7 and 8. Article 21 and 22 shall not apply. However, generic terms shall not be registered.
2022/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 401 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the registration of the proposed geographical indication would be contrary to Articles 35, 37, 38 or 39;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 407 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The Office may decide to extend the transitional period granted under paragraph 1 up to 15 years, or allowing continued use for up to 15 years, provided it is additionally shown that: (a) the name in the designation referred to in paragraph 1 has been in legal use consistently and fairly for at least 25 years before the application for registration of the concerned geographical indication was submitted to the Office; (b) the purpose of using the name in the designation referred to in paragraph (1) has not, at any time, been to profit from the reputation of the name of the product that has been registered as geographical indication; and (c) the consumer has not been or could not have been misled as to the true origin of the product.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 415 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 6
6. Paragraph 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a geographical indication referring to a cross-border geographical area swituated inh a third country, with the exception of the opposition procedure.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 416 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. After completion of the opposition and notice of comments procedure, the Office shall finalise its examination, taking into account any provisional periods, the outcome of any opposition procedure, any notice of comments received and any other matters that come to light in the course of the examination that may give rise to a change in the single document.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 418 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
7. Decisions adopted by the Office shall be published in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products in all the official languages of the Union. The reference to the name of the product, classtype of the product, indications of the country or countries of origin and the reference to the decision published in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 421 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25
Decision by the Commission 1. Concerning applications for registration referred to in Article 17, the Commission may take over from the Office, at any time before the end of the procedure, on its own initiative, on the initiative of a Member State or the Office, the power to decide on the application for registration of the proposed geographical indication where such decision may jeopardise the public interest or the Union’s trade or external relations. The Office shall submit a proposal to the Commission for a decision pursuant to Article 24(2) to 24(6). The Commission shall adopt the final act on the application for registration. This paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation and the amendment of the product specification. 2. In situations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts on the protection of the geographical indication. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2) and shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products. 3. The Office shall ensure that the Commission has access to the documents concerning the applications for registration, any amendment of the product specification and cancellation through the digital system referred to in Article 18(1) and Article 26(1).Article 25 deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 426 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the classtype of the product;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 435 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7
7. The Office shall retain documentation related to the registration of a geographical indication in digital or paper form for the period of validity of the geographical indication, and in case of cancellation or rejection of the application for registration, for 10 years thereafter.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 445 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. A producer group or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest may apply for the approval of an amendment to the product specification of a registered geographical indication.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 446 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Union amendments shall be approved by the Office or, where Article 25 applies, the Commission. The approval procedure shall follow mutatis mutandis the procedure and publication requirements laid down in Articles 6 to 254.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 448 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6
6. Applications for amendments referred to in paragraph 2 submitted by a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4) or by producers established in a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4), shall contain proof that the requested amendment complies with the laws on the protection of geographical indications in force in that third country and in the Member State with which the cross-border geographical area of origin of the product is shared.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 450 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 8
8. Standard amendments shall be approved by Member States or third countries in whose territory the geographical area of the product concerned is located. Such amendments shall be communicated to the Office. Where Article 25 applies, the Office shall approve the standard amendments. The Office shall make those amendments public in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 451 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Office may, own its own initiative or on a duly substantiated request by a Member State, a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4) or any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, decide to cancel the registration of a geographical indication in the following cases:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 454 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where no product has been placed on the market under the geographical indication for at least a consecutive period of 75 years.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 456 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Article 6 and Articles 19 to 254 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation procedure.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 457 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
4. Before deciding to cancel the registration of a geographical indication, the Office shall consult the competent authority of the Member State, the competent authorities of the interested third country or, where possible, the third country producer group which had applied for the registration of the geographical indication concerned, unless the cancellation is directly requested by the original applicants. Any natural person affected by the cancellation of the registration of a geographical indication may submit observations during the cancellation procedure. If the geographical indication was registered pursuant to Article 15, the Office shall consult the Advisory Board referred to in Article 33.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 458 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission may adopt implementing acts laying down detailed rules on procedures and form of the cancellation process, as well as on the presentation of the requests referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and the observations referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 65(2).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 468 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. Opposition and cancellation decisions shall be taken by a panel of three members. At least one member shall be legally qualified. All other decisions of paragraph 1 shall be taken by a single member and one shall be an expert in the field.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 472 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) the assessment of the link between the product and the geographical indication territory;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 482 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Geographical indications entered in the Union register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and geographical indications protected under an international agreement within the Union shall be protected against:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 483 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) any direct or indirect commercial use of the geographical indication in respect of products not covered by the registration, where those products are identical or similar to the products registered under that geographical indication or where use of the name exploits, weakens, dilutes, or is detrimental to the reputation of, the protected geographical indication, even if these products are parts or components of manufactured products;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 484 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) any misuse, counterfeiting, imitation or evocation, even if the true origin of the products or services is indicated or if the protected geographical indication is translated or accompanied by an expression such as ‘style’, ‘type’, ‘method’, ‘as produced in’, ‘imitation’, ‘flavour’, ‘like’ or similar, even if these products are parts or components of manufactured products;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 491 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, point (b), the evocation of a geographical indication shall be deemed to arise, in particular, where a term, sign, or other labelling or packaging device presents a direct and clear linkclear link is present with the product covered by the registered geographical indication in the mind of the reasonably circumspect consumer, thereby exploiting, weakening, diluting or being detrimental to the reputation of the registered name.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 495 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5
5. The producer group or any producer that is entitled to usethe holder of the protected geographical indication shall be entitled to prevent all third parties from bringing goods, in the course of trade, into the Union without being released for free circulation there, where such goods, including packaging, come from third countries and are contrary to paragraph 1.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 500 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. Generic terms not associated with names of a specific place, region or country shall not be registered as a geographical indication.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 501 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. To establish whether or not a term has become generic, account shall be taken of all relevant factors, in particular: (a) the existing situation in areas of consumption; (b) the relevant Union or national legal acts.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 505 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39
Trade marks A name shall not be registered as a geographical indication where, in the light of a trade mark’s reputation and renown, registration of the name proposed as a geographical indication could mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product.Article 39 deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 507 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. Member States or the Office, when Article 15 applies, shall verify that the producer group operates in a transparent and democratic manner and that all producers of the product designated by the geographical indication enjoy right of membership in the group. Member States may provide that public officials, and other stakeholders such as consumer groups, retailers and suppliers, also participate in the work of the producer group.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 510 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) develop and amend the product specification and manage internal controls that ensure compliance of production steps of product designated by the geographical indication with that specification;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 511 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) take legal action to ensure the protection of the geographical indication and of the intellectual property rights that are directly connected with it and prevent and counteract any measures that are or risk being detrimental to the image of their products;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 512 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) agree sustainability undertakings, whether or not included in the product specification or as a separate initiative, including arrangements for verification of compliance with these undertakings and assuring adequate publicity for them in particular in an information system provided by the Commission;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 515 #

2022/0115(COD)

(v) providing advice and training to current and future producers, including on gender mainstreaming and equality; and
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 517 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2
2. The Office and, when applicable, the competent national authorities shall invalidate ex officio trade marks registered in breach of paragraph 1.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 520 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, a trade mark the use of which contravenes Article 35, which has been applied for, registered, or established by use in good faith within the territory of the Union, if that possibility is provided for by the legislation concerned, or protected within the territory of the Union before the date on which the application for registration of the geographical indication is submitted to the Office, may continue to be used and reneweduntil the expiry of the trade mark registration, notwithstanding the registration of a geographical indication, provided that no grounds for invalidity or revocation of the trade mark exist under Directive (EU) 2015/243632 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. In such cases, the use of the geographical indication and that of the relevant trade mark shall be permitted. After the expiry of the trade mark registration, products so labelled may be marketed until the stocks are exhausted. _________________ 32 Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ L 336, 23.12.2015, p. 1).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 521 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. A registered geographical indication may be used by any producer marketing a product conforming to the corresponding product specification or to a single document or an equivalent to the latter.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 526 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. In the case of craft and industrial products originating in the Union that are marketed under a geographical indication, the Union symbol referred to in paragraph 1 mayshall appear on the labelling and advertising material. The geographical indication shall be in the same field of vision as the Union symbol.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 527 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3
3. The abbreviation ‘PGI’ corresponding to the indication ‘protected geographical indication’ mayshall appear on the labelling of products designated by a geographical indication of craft and industrial products and, where applicable, on the advertising material.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 531 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 5
5. After the submission of a Union application for the registration of a geographical indication, producers may indicate on the labelling, and in the presentation, of the product that an application has been filed in compliance with Union law.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 534 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6
6. The Union symbol indicating the protected geographical indication and the Union indication ‘protected geographical indication’ and the abbreviation ‘PGI’ as relevant, may appear on the labelling and, where applicable, on advertising material only after the publication of the decision on registration in accordance with Articles 24 and 25.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 537 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 7
7. Where an application is rejected, any products labelled in accordance with paragraph 4 may be marketed until the stocks are exhausted.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 538 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. TIn order not to mislead the reasonably cautious consumer as to the origin of the products, the following mayshall also appear on the labelling:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 539 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) depictions of the geographical area of origin, as referred to in the product specification; and
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 540 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) text, graphics or symbolindication of the country of origin of the product ("Made in [country of origin]") and emblems or flags referring to the Member State or the region in which that geographical area of origin is located.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 541 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Where the size or nature of the product does not allow for the indications in (a) and (b), such information shall be provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the product.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 542 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 9
9. The Union symbol associated with a geographical indication entered in the Union Register of geographical indications for craft and industrial products designating craft and industrial product originating in third countries, may appear on the product labelling and advertising material, in which case the symbol shall be used in conformity with paragraph 2.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 546 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 4
4. In respect of geographical indications that designate products originating in a third country, the verification of compliance with the specifications before placing the product on the market shall be carried out by : (a) a public competent authority designated by the third country; or (b) one or more product certification bodies.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 549 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 6
6. The costs of verification of compliance with the product specification may be borne by the producers, which are subject to those controls. Member States may also contribute to those costs, in particular for micro, small and medium- sized enterprises.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 554 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2
2. The enforcement authority shall carry out controls, based on a risk analysis and notifications of interested producers of products designated by geographical indications, to ensure conformity with the product specification or the single document or an equivalent to the latter.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 559 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. As provided for in Article 47(c), applicant producer groups as referred to in Article 6, which obtained the registration of the geographical indication, shall be entitled to notify the authorities designated pursuant to paragraph 1 in order for them to carry out checks as provided for in this Title. In such cases, upon request by the associations, the authorities shall provide information on the progress of the process initiated by such notification.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 569 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities may delegate official control tasks to one or more product certification bodies including natural persons. The competent authority shall ensure that the delegated product certification body or natural person, to which such tasks have been delegated, have the powers and the expertise needed to effectively perform these tasks.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 577 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall make public the names and addressecontacts of the designated competent authorities and delegated product certification bodies including natural persons referred to in Article 46(3) and keep that information up-to-date.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 579 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. The Office shall make public the names and addressecontacts of the competent authorities and product certification bodies referred to in Article 46(4) and update that information periodically.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 583 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/1753
Article 7 – paragraph 2
In respect of craft and industrial geographical indications, the decision whether to grant protection shall be adopted by the Office, or, in cases referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2022/…, by the Commission.. The related implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 584 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point e Regulation (EU) 2019/1753
5a. In respect of craft and industrial geographical indications concerning the protection of which a previous refusal has been notified by the Office, the Office may, on its own initiative or following a duly substantiated request by a Member State, a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/... or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, withdraw, in whole or in part, a refusal previously notified to the International Bureau.;
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 585 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/1753
Article 9 – paragraph 1
— 1. The Commission or, in respect of craft and industrial geographical indications, the Office may, on its own initiative or following a duly substantiated request by a Member State, a third country concerned pursuant to Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/... or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, invalidate, in whole or in part the effects of protection in the Union of a geographical indication, in one or more of the following circumstances:
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 586 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2017/1001
Article 170a – paragraph 1
1. For domain names registered under a country-code top-level domain name, administered or managed by a registry established in the Union, the Office shall provide a domain name information and alert system. Upon submission of an application for an EU trade mark geographical indication, that information and alert system shall inform applicants for an EU trade mark about the availability of their markindication as a domain name, and applicants for and proprietors of an EU trade mark geographical indication on an optional basis once a domain name containing an identical or similar name with their markindication is registered (domain name alerts).
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 587 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title VI
VI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 62 Technical assistance of the Office The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting the Office with the examination and other administrative tasks concerning third country geographical indications for craft and industrial products, other than geographical indications under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, proposed for protection pursuant to international negotiations or international agreements.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 592 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 3
3. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 17 to 254, the Office or, in cases referred to in Article 25, the Commission shall register the names referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, which comply with Articles 2, 5, 7 and 8. Article 21 and 22 shall not apply. However, generic terms shall not be registered.
2022/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 294 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In order for a construction product covered by a harmonised technical specification to be placed on the market, the manufacturer is obliged to draw a declaration of performance for such product. The manufacturer assumes the responsibility for the conformity of the product with such declared performance. Certain exemptions to this obligation are provided.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 303 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Construction products placed on the market in the outermost regions of the European Union are often imported from neighbouring countries, and are therefore not subject to requirements laid down in Union law. Subjecting those construction products to such requirements would be disproportionately costly. At the same time, construction products manufactured in the outermost regions hardly circulate in other Member States. Accordingly, Member States should have the possibility to exempt construction products placed on the market or directly installed in the outermost regions of the European Union from those requirements.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18 a) To provide predictability for manufacturers, public authorities and the wider construction ecosystem, the Commission should, at the latest 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation and based on a scientific and evidence-based approach, adopt a working plan, covering at least 3 years, laying down a list of product groups for which it plans to adopt requirements and standardisation requests.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 313 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In particular, in the case of energy- related products included in ecodesign working plans which are also construction products and for intermediary products, with the exception of cement, priority for the setting of sustainability requirements will be given to the [ESPR]. This should be the case for instance fore intermediary products concerned are heaters, boilers, heat pumps, water and space heating appliances, fans, cooling and ventilating systems and photovoltaic products, excluding building- integrated photovoltaic panels. In this respect, a detailed definition of energy- related products together with a full list of energy-related products which are also construction products shall be drafted by the European Commission within the framework of the [ESPR] with the aim to avoid unnecessary legislative overlaps and duplications of sustainability requirements which may hinder the internal market. This Regulation may still intervene in a complementary manner where needed, mainly in relation to safety aspects also taking account of other Union legislation on products such as on gas appliances, low voltage, and machinery. For other products, in order to avoid unnecessary burden for economic operators, the need may arise in future to determine the conditions under which the fulfilment of obligations under other Union law also fulfils certain obligations under this Regulation. The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to determine such conditions.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 319 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) To create transparency for users of construction products and to avoid inappropriate use of those products, construction products and their intended use should be precisely identified by the manufacturer. For the same reason, the manufacturer should make clear whethern the construction products are intended for professional use only, or also for use by consumers. To ensure that construction products can be traced back, manufacturers should be indicated on the product or, where this is not possible e.g. due to the product’s size or surface, on its packaging or, where that is not possible either, in a document accompanying it.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 325 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) In order to be able to make informed choices, users of construction products should be sufficiently well informed about the environmental performances of products, about their conformity with environmental requirements and of the degree of fulfilment of manufacturer’s environmental obligations in this regard. Therefore, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to establish specific labelling requirements which might include the easily understandable traffic light labelling.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) In order to avoid that 3D-printing is used to circumvent the obligations under this Regulation, 3D-printing service providers should have certain information obligations.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation establishes harmonised rules for the making available on the market and direct installation of construction products, regardless of whether undertaken in the framework of a service or not, by establishing:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 339 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) rules on how to express the environmental, including climate, and safety performance of construction products in relation to their essential characteristics;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 343 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) environmental, including climate, functional and safety product requirements for construction products.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 345 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
This Regulation also establishes obligations incumbent on economic operators dealing with construction products or their components or with products that could be regarded as construction products whilst not being intended by their manufacturer to be construction products.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 351 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 3D-datasets placed on the market to permit the 3D-printing of construction products covered by this Regulation and 3D-printed construction products and moulds;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 355 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) materials intended to be used for the 3D-printing of construction products on or close to the construction site or for the manufacturing using moulds on or close to the construction siter for the manufacturing using moulds;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) construction products manufactured on the construction site for immediate incorporation into construction works, without separate commercial action for the placing on the market;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 361 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) kits or assemblies, where their composition is specified in and covered by harmonised technical specifications or European assessment documents (EADs);deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 364 #

2022/0094(COD)

(g) prefabricated one-family-houses of less than 180 m2 surface floor space with one floor or of less than 100 m2 surface floor space on two floors.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States may decide not to apply this Regulation for the houses referred to in point (g) by notification to the Commission.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) boilers, pipes, tanks and ancillaries and other products intended to be in contact with water for human consumption;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 382 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) systems treating waste water;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 385 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) sanitary appliances;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) traffic signalling products.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 392 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(e a) photovoltaic elements other than building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) elements;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 393 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)
(e b) Electrical and electronic products which are not included in products in line 1-32 of the table I of Annex IV.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 395 #

2022/0094(COD)

4. This Regulation also shall also apply to 3D-printing services of construction products and of items covered by this Regulation. 3D-printing services include renting out of 3D- printing machines that could be used for construction products and items covered by this Regulation. This Regulation shall also apply to services linked to: — the manufacturing and commercialisation of construction products and or items covered by this Regulation, and — to the de-installing, preparation for re- use, remanufacturing and dealing with used construction products or items covered by this Regulation.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 397 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may exempt from the application of this Regulation construction products and items covered by this Regulation that are placed on the market or directly installed in the outermost regions of the European Union in the meaning of Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Member States shall notify to the European Commission and to the other Member States the regulations providing such exemptions. They shall ensure that exempted construction products or items do not bear the CE marking in accordance with Article 16. Construction products or items placed on the market or directly installed on the basis of such exemption shall not be deemed to be placed on the market or directly installed in the Union in the meaning of this Regulation.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 403 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘construction product’ means any formed or formless physical item, including its packaging and instructions for use, or a kit or assembly combining such items, that isproduct or kit which is produced and placed on the market or produced for incorporation in a permanent manner in construction works or parts thereof within the Union, with the exception of items that are necessarily first integrated into an assembly, kit or other construction product prior to being incorporated in a permanent manner in construction worksand the performance of which has an effect on the performance of the construction works with respect to the basic requirements for construction works, including3D-printed products or other items covered by this Regulation in accordance with Article 2(1) to (3);
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 405 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘permanent’ means for a duration of two years or longerinstalled or affixed in such a manner that may significantly affect the basic work requirements and that the item cannot be removed without tools or mechanical force;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 408 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘product’ means a construction product or other item covered by this Regulation in accordance with Article 2(1) to (3);deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 412 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘direct installation’ means the installation of a product into a construction work of a client without prior making available on the market or the installation of a one-family house covered by this Regulation, regardless whether in the framework of providing a service or not;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 418 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) ‘product requirements’ means a threshold level or another characteristic with which a product has to comply before it can be placed on the market or installed directly, including those requirements relating to labelling and instructions for use or other information to be provided;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 422 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘economic operator’ means the manufacturer, the authorised representative, the importer, the distributor, the fulfilment service provider, the 3D- printing service provider, manufacturer, importer or distributor of materials intended for 3D-printing of products, online seller, the broker, the supplier, the service provider, the own- brand-labeller or any other natural or legal person, other than authorities, notified bodies, technical assessment bodies and product contact points for construction who is subject to this Regulation in relation to the manufacturing, de- installation for re-use, re-manufacturing or repackaging of products, or making those products available on the market or installing those products directly in accordance with this Regulation, and economic operators as defined in Article 3, point (13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council44 ; _________________ 44 Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011 (OJ L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1).
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 424 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘3D-printing service provider’ means any natural or legal person offering, in the course of a commercial activity, one of the following services: renting or leasing out 3D-printers, printing out 3D-printing datasets, or brokering one of these services, regardless of whether the printing material is provided by that person or not;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 427 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘materials intended for 3D- printing of products’ means any material intended or the 3D-printing of products for which the respective economic operators have not explicitly and consistently excluded the use as materials for 3D-printing;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 430 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘3D-datasets’ means a set of numerical data describing the shape of an object by its outer dimensions and its cavities in view of permitting the 3D- printing of that object;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 432 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
(15) ‘buildings’ means facilities, other than containers, giving shelter to humans, animals or objects, which either are permanently fixed to the ground or can only be transported by the help of special equipment whilst having a surface floor space of at least 20m2 on one or several levels;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘level’ means the result of the assessment of the performance of a product in relation to its essential characteristics, expressed as a numerical valueexpression of performance without a classification of potential performances and/or a specified minimum or maximum;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 435 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17
(17) ‘class’ means a range of levels, delimited by a minimum and a maximum value, of performance of a productn expression of performance according to a systematic division of potential performances;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 439 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) ‘assembly’ means a set of at least two separate items, one of which is a product;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 440 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) ‘intended use’ means the use intended by the manufacturer, including the conditions for usage, as laid out in technical documentation, on labels, in instructions for use, or in publicity material, whilst usages mentioned only in one of these are already part of the ‘intended use’intended use as determined by the manufacturer of the construction product as defined in the applicable harmonised technical specification;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 452 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 39
(39) ‘Union law’ means the TEU, the TFEU, general principles of law, acts of general applicability referred to in the second, third and fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and any international agreements to which the Union is party or the Union and its Member States are parties;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 464 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 48
(48) ‘double use product’ means a product that is, by its manufacturer, intended to be used as product and as an item with another intended use that would fall outside of the scope of this Regulation if it had only that other intended use;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 465 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 51
(51) ‘full-time equivalence’ means the work-power of one person employed full- time as defined by the Member State concerned or the work-power of several persons employed part-time working together the same number of hours per day or week;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 467 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 57
(57) ‘broker’ means any natural or legal person providing an intermediation service for the placing on the market or direct installation of products;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2022/0094(COD)

The Commission mayshall issue standardisation requests in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012 laying down the basic principles and corner stones for the establishment of these essential characteristics and their assessment methods.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 492 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
These standardisation requests shall be issued in accordance with the working plan established in accordance with Article 93a.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 495 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and in order to cover the regulatory needs of Member States and to pursue the goals of Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87, by establishing, for particular product families and categories, voluntary or mandatory essential characteristics and their assessment methods in any of the following cases: (a) there are undue delays in the adoption of certain standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2)by the European standardisation organisations, whilst an undue delay is given where the European standardisation organisation does not submit a standard within the time-frame set out in the standardisation request; (b) there is an urgency for the adoption of more harmonised technical specifications that cannot be matched with standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) alone; (c) one or more essential characteristics referring to basic work requirements set out in Annex I Part A, Point 1 or included in Annex I Part A, Point 2 are not covered by the standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) the references of which are already published in the Official Journal; (d) the standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) are for other reasons considered not sufficient to cover regulatory needs of Member States or the needs of economic operators; (e) the standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) are not in line with EU climate and environmental legislation and ambition; (f) references to standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) cannot be published in the Official Journal for the reasons set out in Article 34(4) or other legal reasons; (g) references to standards referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) have been withdrawn from the Official Journal or were published with a restriction.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 522 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and in order to cover the regulatory needs of Member States and to pursue the goals of Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission may supplement in exceptional cases, after consultation of the relevant European standardisation organisations and European stakeholder organisations receiving Union financing under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, this Regulation by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87, by establishing, for particular product families and categories, voluntary or mandatory essential characteristics and their assessment methods where the following cases have been fulfilled: (a) no reference to harmonised standards covering the relevant essential characteristics is published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 and no such reference is expected to be published within a reasonable period; and (b) the Commission has requested one or more European standardisation organisations to draft a harmonised standard for the requirements; (c) the request has not been accepted by any of the European standardisation organisations or the standard is not delivered within the deadline. Before preparing a draft delegated act, the Commission shall inform the committee referred to in Article 22 of Regulation EU (No) 1025/2012 that it considers that the conditions in paragraph 1 are fulfilled. If harmonised standards covering the essential requirements are developed and the references to them are published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, the relevant delegated acts shall no longer apply. In the early preparation of the draft delegated act establishing the common specification, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectorial Union law. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft delegated act.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 532 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. IWhile priority shall be given to the elaboration of standards in order to cover the regulatory needs of Member States and to pursue the environmental, safety and harmonisation goals of Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87, after consultation of the relevant European standardisation organisations and European stakeholder organisations receiving Union financing under Regulation(EU) No 1025/2012, by determining, for particular product families and categories, the following:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 539 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission, after consultation of the relevant European stakeholder organisations, is empowered to amend Annex I Part A by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87 in order to adapt it to technical progress and to cover new risks and environmental aspects.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 547 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. All products covered by this Regulation shall, prior to their placing on the market or direct installation, satisfy the generic, directly applicable product requirements set out in Annex I Part D and, satisfy the product requirements laid down in Annex I Part B, C and C asD when specified for the respective product family or category in accordance with paragraph 2. The product requirements laid down in Annex I Part B, C and CD are only applicable where they have been specified in accordance with paragraph 2.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 557 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In order to specify the product requirements set out in Annex I Part B, C and D, the Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87, by specifying, for particular product families and categories, these product requirements and by laying down the corresponding assessment methods. Once the Commission has specified these product requirements by delegated acts, it mayshall issue standardisation requests which aim at the elaboration of voluntary harmonised standards providing presumption of conformity with these mandatory product requirements as specified by these delegated acts.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 562 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, after consultation with European stakeholder organisations, is empowered to amend Annex I Part B, C and D by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87 in order to adapt it to technical progress and in particular to cover new risks and environmental aspects.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 570 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – title
Assessment and verification systems and their product specific modalities
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 573 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. In order to counter systematic non-compliances of notified bodies or manufacturers or in view of adaptation to technical progress, the Commission is empowered to amend this Regulation, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 87, by introducing additional assessment or verification steps in the systems of Annex V.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 578 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The harmonised zone shall be presumed to be comprehensive, covering all potential legal requirements for products other than those covered by other Union lawconstruction products.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 582 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. This Regulation does not hinder Member States to introduce mandatory deposit-refund systems, to oblige manufacturers to take back used or not used non-custom-made products directly or via their importers and distributors and to establish obligations regarding the collection and the treatment of products for waste, provided that all of the following is complied with:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 589 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8
8. Member States may ban the destruction of non-custom-made products taken back in accordance with Article 22(2), point (j) and Article 26 or make the destruction of these products dependent on their prior making available on a national brokering platform for non-commercial use of products.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 596 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. By drawing up the declaration of performance, the manufacturer assumes responsibility for the conformity of the product with such declared performance and becomes liable in accordance with Union and national laws on contractual and extra-contractual liability, and this even where it did not act negligently. In the absence of objective indications to the contrary, Member States shall presume the declaration of performance drawn up by the manufacturer to be accurate and reliable.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 597 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the product is, otherwise than by 3D-printing or already existing moulds, individually manufactured or custom-made in a non- series process in response to a specific order, and installed in a single identified construction work, by a manufacturer who is also responsible for the safe incorporation of the product into the construction work in compliance with the applicable national rules, and under the supervision of those responsible for the safe execution of the construction works designated under the applicable national rules;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 598 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the product is otherwise than by 3D-printing or already existing moulds manufactured on the construction site, in a non-series process for its incorporation in the respective construction work in compliance with the applicable national rules and under the supervision of those responsible for the safe execution of the construction works designated under the applicable national rules; or
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 599 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. A Member State may exempt from Article 9(1) parts of construction works other than products that are prepared for re-use or remanufactured provided that the part does not to circulate outside the territory of that Member State.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 612 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Where there is no declaration of performance available for a used product issued by the initial manufacturer or another economic operator pursuant to this Regulation or Regulation (EU) 305/2011, an economic operator may issue a new declaration of performance without undergoing a full procedure in accordance with this Regulation where it limits the intended use to decoration”ve purposes. Where the economic operator has used this derogation, the declaration of performance shall be labelled “declaration of performance for used product with decorative purposes”.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 619 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. By the declaration of conformity, the manufacturer assumes responsibility for the conformity of the product with the product requirements and becomes liable in accordance with national laws on contractual and extra-contractual liability, and this even where it did not act negligently. In case of non-compliance or absence of a declaration of conformity, the product may not be made available on the market. In the absence of objective indications to the contrary, Member States shall presume the declaration of conformity drawn up by the manufacturer to be accurate and reliable.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 627 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Declarations may contain permalinks to unamendable environmental product declarations or other unamendable documents containing the requested information if those documents follow the order and structure of the declarations or if a correlation table linking the order of the declarations to the order of these documents is provided together with the permalinkdocuments containing the requested information.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 643 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The CE marking shall be affixed to those products for which the manufacturer has drawn up a declaration of performance or a declaration of performance and conformity in accordance with Articles 9 and 11 to 14. The CE marking shall be affixed to key parts. The CE marking may not be affixed to parts which are not key parts.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 649 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) the unique identification code of the product-type, the permalink to the manufacturer’s products registration(s) in Union databases and the precise location therein where the product can be found;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 651 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) the identification number of the notified body, if applicable.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 653 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The CE marking shall be affixed before the product is placed on the market or directly installed into a construction work. It may be subsequently followed by a pictogram or any other mark indicating a special risk or use.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 659 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Markings other than the CE marking, including private ones, may contain additional information that could help users to make an informed choice on which product would be best suited for the needs of their construction work
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 661 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
No oOther marking than marking set out by Union legislation may be affixed on a product in a distance smaller than the double length of the CE marking measured from any poas long as it does not impair the visibility, legibility and meanintg of the CE and the other marking set out by Union lawmarking.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 664 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Where diverging statements of non-compliance of an economic operator or of a product and requests for corrective action emanate from authorities of different Member States, an economic operator shall take differentiated measures, subject to where the products are intended to be made available on the market or directly installed. Where this is not possible or where a more severe measure imposed by one Member State encompasses the less severe measure imposed by another, the more severe measure shall be taken. Where these rules do not lead to a clear result, the Member States concerned and the Commission, and, on their request, other Member States shall try to find a common solution and, if need is, adopt an implementing act in accordance with Article 33.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 666 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) who is involved in financial and other collateral services linked to the making available or direct installation of products.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 671 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point iii
(iii) email addresses, and websites and social media profiles, if any, of these operators;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 672 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point v
(v) bank accounts of these operators; andeleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 678 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. The manufacturer shall determine the product type, respecting the boundaries set up therefore by the definition provided in Article 3 point (31). The product type shall be processed in accordance with the applicable assessment and verification system set out in Annex V. The manufacturer shall draw up a declaration of performance and a declaration of conformity in accordance with Articles 9 and Articles 11 to 15 and affix the CE marking in accordance with Articles 16 and 17.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 679 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. The manufacturer shall refrain from any claim about the characteristics of a product that is not based on: (a) the assessment method contained in a harmonised technical specification where the relevant characteristic is covered by such; or (b) where no such assessment method exists, an assessment method which represents the most effective and advanced method to achieve an accurate assessment.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 682 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The manufacturer shall, as the basis for the declarations referred to in paragraph 1, draw up a technical documentation describing the intended use including the precise conditions for use and all the elements necessary to demonstrate performance and conformity.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 683 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
That technical documentation shall contain the mandatory or facultative calculation of environmental, including climate sustainability assessed in accordance with harmonised technical specifications adopted under this Regulation or with Commission acts adopted under this Regulation.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 684 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The manufacturer shall ensure that its product bear a manufacturer-specific type number and, a batch or serial number or any other element allowing their identification. If this is impossible, the required information shall be provided on the packaging, on an affixed tag or, as last resort, in a document accompanying the product.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 687 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The manufacturer shallmay in the same way as set out in the first subparagraph label a product as “Only fFor professional use” if it is not intended for consumers or other non-professional usersappropriate to have some kind of expertise in order to use the product. Products not labelled “Only fFor professional use” shall be deemed to be also intended for non- professional users and consumers in the meaning of this Regulation and the Regulation (EU) … [Regulation on General Product Safety].
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 692 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 9
9. Where the product presents a risk or is likely to present a risk, the manufacturer shall within two working days thereof inform, the manufacturer shall inform without undue delay the authorised representative, importers, distributors, fulfilment service providers, and online market places involved in the distribution, as well as the competent national authorities of the Member States in which the manufacturer or – to its knowledge – other economic operators made the product available. The manufacturer shall, to that effect, provide all useful details and, in particular, specify the type of the non- compliance, the frequency of accidents or incidents and the corrective measures taken or recommended. In case of risks caused by products which have already reached the final user or consumer, the manufacturer shall also alert the media andat cannot be identified or contacted directly. The manufacturer shall through media and other appropriate channels, ensuring the widest possible reach, disseminate the inform themation about appropriate measures to eliminate or, if not possible, to reduce the risks. In case of a “serious risk” in the meaning of Article 3, point (71) the manufacturer shall withdraw and recall the product at their own cost.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 695 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) respect the minimum recycled content obligations and other limit values regarding aspects of environmental, including climate sustainability contained in harmonised technical specifications; sustainability as assessed per each product category. Minimum recycled content obligations should be set by the European Commission after consulting with industry stakeholder
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 697 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. In order to ensure transparency for the users and to promote sustainable products, the Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation by delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 87 to establish specific environmental sustainability labelling requirements including “traffic-light- labelling” in relation to environmental obligations set out in paragraph 1, product inherent environmental requirements set out in Annex I Part C Point 2, and environmental performance classes established in accordance with of Article 4(4), point (a).deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 698 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 6
6. The manufacturer shall affix the traffic light label in the way set out in the delegated acts adopted in accordance with paragraph 5.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 702 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Authorised representatives shall act with due care in relation to the obligations of this Regulation. They shall be liable for gross negligence or conscious infringement of this Article and of Article 19 in accordance with national law on contractual and extra-contractual liability.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 703 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) terminate the contract, when deemed appropriate, where the manufacturer infringes this Regulation and inform thereof the competent national authorities of the Member States where the product is placed on the market and the national competent authority of his own place of business;
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 704 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) when having reason to believe that a product in question is non-compliant or presents a risk, inform the manufacturer and the national competent authorities of the Member States where the product is placed on the market and the national competent authority of his own place of business thereof; and
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 705 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5
5. Where an authorised representative considers that there iidentifies a non-compliance mentioned in the paragraph 4, the authorised representative shall ask the manufacturer to remedy the non- compliances. The manufacturer shall thereon stop the placing on the market and ask other economic operators involved in the distribution to stop their commercial activities, until the authorised representative regards the infringements as remedied. Where the non-compliances are not remedied within one month whilst products possibly continue to be made available on the market, the authorised representative shall be allowed to terminate his contract with the manufacturer and thereof inform the national competent authorities of the Member States where the products are placed on the market and the national competent authority of his own place of business. The latter shall coordinate joint actions of all competent authorities, unless the national competent authorities agree on another national competent authority to coordinatenon-compliance is remedied.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 706 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. After having assembled all available product information from the manufacturer and the de-installer, the importer shall in particular scrutinise used and remanufactured products, namely with regard to damages or indications for loss of performance or non-compliance and changed mechanical or chemical properties, and assess all risks; when necessary to ensure safety or the protection of the environment, the importer shall reduce the intended use or refrain from selling. This obligation shall also apply to used and remanufactured products for which no declaration of performance is mandatory.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 708 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
7. The importer shall investigate complaints, and, if necessary, keep a register of complaints, of non-conforming products and of product withdrawals or recalls, and shall keep manufacturers and distributors informed of any such monitoring.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 710 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. When making a product available on the market, the distributors shall verify at a documentary level that the manufacturer and the importer have complied with the requirements set out in Article 21(1), (5) and (6) and where applicable in Article 22(2), points (f) and (i) and shall fulfil the obligations incumbent on importers in accordance with Article 24(13) to (5) whilst references to “placing on the market” shall be understood as “further making available on the market”.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 712 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. The distributor shall ensure that no products are sold to consumers or other non-professional users which are labelled “for professional use only”. These products shall, in their premises, online and on paper publicity material, be presented as products for professional use only.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 717 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. When contributing to the making available on the market or direct installation of a product, fulfilment service provider or broker shall act with due care in relation to the obligations of this Regulation. It shall be liable for infringement of this Article and of Article 19 in accordance with national law on contractual and extra-contractual liability.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 718 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28
providers and of providers of moulds, of 3D-printing datasets, and of 3D-printing 1. A 3D-printing service provider shall: (a) refrain from placing on the market or directly installing products for clients without satisfying the obligations incumbent on manufacturers; (b) inform its clients that they may use 3D-printing services only for the fabrication of products for their own use, unless satisfying the obligations incumbent on manufacturers; (c) inform its clients that the 3D-datasets and the materials to be used shall have undergone the procedures applicable to products under this Regulation; and (d) inform its clients that both the information provided by the manufacturer of the 3D-dataset and the information provided by the manufacturer of the printing material shall coincide and confirm the usability of the material for that type of 3D-dataset and the given 3D- printing technology. 2. Providers of moulds and of 3D-datasets intended to produce items covered by this Regulation shall produce 10 such items and shall make them available to the notified body, technical assessment body and to authorities on request. Providers of moulds and of 3D-datasets intended to produce items covered by this Regulation shall assess and document the fulfilment of requirements of this Regulation with regard to the produced items. 3. Providers of materials intended to be used for the 3D-printing of items covered by this Regulation on or close to the construction site shall produce 10 such items for each intended use and shall make them available to the notified body, technical assessment body and to authorities on request. Providers of materials intended to be used for the 3D- printing of items covered by this Regulation on or close to the construction site shall assess and document the fulfilment of requirements of this Regulation with regard to the produced items.Article 28 deleted Obligations of 3D-printing service materials
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 719 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29
Obligations of economic operators de- installing or dealing with used products 1. An economic operator de-installing used products for re-use or re- manufacturing shall establish protocols on the place, conditions and presumed length of use of the de-installed product and make them available together with the products, regardless whether it exert its activity on its own behalf or for somebody else. The economic operator shall also make the protocols available on request to authorities, to later users of these products and to owners of the construction works in which they were re- installed. 2. Where an economic operator brokers, sells or otherwise makes available de- installed used products on its own behalf or for somebody else, it shall also fulfil the obligations of importers or distributors with regard to used products.Article 29 deleted for re-use or remanufacturing
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 722 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30
Obligations of suppliers and service providers involved in the manufacturing 1. A supplier or service provider involved in the manufacturing of products shall: (a) provide to manufacturers, notified bodies and authorities all available information on the environmental sustainability of their supplied component or service; (b) ensure the correctness of such information namely by respecting this Regulation and correct any errors made by communication to all their clients and, if potentially useful, to notified bodies and authorities; (c) permit, in absence of such information, their customers to assess that environmental sustainability on their own expense and support that assessment, namely by giving access to all documents, including those of commercial character, relevant for that assessment; (d) permit notified bodies to verify the correctness of any calculation of the environmental sustainability and support that verification; (e) permit notified bodies to verify the performance and compliance of the supplied component or service and support that verification. 2. Where a supplier or service provider has been informed in accordance with the last sentence of Article 21(8), it shall forward that information to his other clients who have, in the last 5 years, received components or services which are identical with regard to the issue in question. In case of a serious risk as defined in Article 3, point (71) or a risk falling under the last sentence of Article 21(9), the supplier or service provider shall also inform the national competent authorities of the Member States where products with that component or manufacturing service have been made available on the market or directly installed; where it cannot identify these Member States, it shall inform all national competent authorities.Article 30 deleted of products
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 727 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31
Double use and pseudo products 1. A manufacturer of double use products shall satisfy the obligations of this Regulation for all the items of the respective type, unless they are specifically marked as “not for construction”. 2. Other economic operators dealing with double use products shall fulfil the obligations incumbent on them in accordance with this Regulation. In their commercial contracts, they shall establish an obligation of their clients to do the same and not to sell or to use items for construction which are marked as “not for construction”. 3. For items suitable for construction for which the manufacturer has never intended such use and which, therefore, have not been CE-marked (“pseudo products”), other economic operators shall: (a) not acquire or sell them as items being intended for construction without undergoing the procedures set out in this Regulation to be undergone by manufacturers; (b) ensure by presentation that they cannot be understood as being intended for construction; and (c) establish a contractual obligation of their clients to do the same and not to use these items for construction.Article 31 deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 731 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
Where this is necessary to ensure a harmonised application of this Regulation and only to the extent necessary to prevent diverging practices creating an uneven playing field for economic operators, the Commission may adopt implementing acts providing details on how to execute the obligations and rights of economic operators contained in this Chapter. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(2).Article 33 deleted Implementing acts on economic operators’ obligations and rights
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 734 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Following a request for a European technical assessment by a manufacturer or a group of manufacturers or on initiative of the Commission, a European assessment document may be drawn up and adopted by the organisation of technical assessment bodies (‘TABs’) in agreement with the Commission for any kind or category of products product not covered by:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 745 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a description of the kind or category of products product covered; and
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 747 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the list of essential characteristics, relevant for the intended use of the kind or category of products product as set out by the manufacturer and agreed between the manufacturer and the organisation of TABs, and the methods and criteria for assessing the performance of the product in relation to those essential characteristics.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 749 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2
2. Principles for the applicable factory production control to be applied shall be set out in the European assessment document, taking into account the conditions of the manufacturing process of the kind or category of products product concerned.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 750 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. Where the performance of some of certain essential characteristics of the kind or category of products product can appropriately be assessed with methods and criteria established in harmonised technical specifications or European assessment documents, those existing methods and criteria shall be incorporated as parts of the European assessment document, unless there are good reasons to deviate from this rule.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 775 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation by means of delegated act according to Article 87, by setting up a voluntary Union construction products database or system where information related to showing compliance with this regulation can be stored or linked to. This initiative should that builds to the extent possible on the Digital Product Passport established by Regulation (EU) ... [Regulation on ecodesign for sustainable products] in order to avoid overlaps with other EU legislation and to ensure interoperability with already existing requirements.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 792 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall support economic operators by product contact points for construction. Member States shall designate and maintain at least one product contact point for construction on their territory and shall ensure that their product contact points for construction have sufficient powers and adequate resources for the proper performance of their tasks and at any rate at least one full- time equivalence per Member State and one additional full-time equivalence per each ten millions of inhabitants. They shall ensure that product contact points for construction deliver their services in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/172449 and that they coordinate with the contact points for mutual recognition established by Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2019/51550 . _________________ 49 Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012; OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 1–38. 50 Regulation (EU) 2019/515 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 on the mutual recognition of goods lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Regulation (EC) No 764/2008; OJ L 91, 29.3.2019, p. 1–18.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 794 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission after consultation with the Member states may cooperate, including through the exchange of information, with third countries or international organisations in the field of application of this Regulation, such as:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 797 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83
1. Where Member States provide incentives for a product category covered by a delegated act establishing performance classes in accordance with Article 4(4), point (a) or a “traffic-light-labelling” in accordance with Article 22(5), those incentives shall aim at the highest two populated classes / colour codes, or at higher classes / better colour codes. Where a delegated act defines classes of performance in relation to more than one sustainability parameter, it shall be indicated therein in relation to which parameter this Article should be implemented. 2. Where no delegated act is adopted pursuant to Article 4(4), the Commission may specify in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4(3), which levels of performance related to product parameters theArticle 83 deleted Member States incentives shall concern. When doing so, the Commission shall take into account the following criteria: (a) the relative affordability of the products depending on their level of performance; (b) the need to ensure sufficient demand for more environmentally sustainable products.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 804 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 84
1. The Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation by delegated acts according to Article 87 by establishing sustainability requirements applicable to public contracts, including implementation, monitoring and reporting of those requirements by Member States. 2. Requirements adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 for public contracts awarded by contracting authorities, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 3, point (1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, or contracting entities, as defined in Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, may take the form of mandatory technical specifications, selection criteria, award criteria, contract performance clauses, or targets, as appropriate. 3. When establishing requirements pursuant to paragraph 1 for public contracts, the Commission shall take into account the following criteria: (a) the value and volume of public contracts awarded for that given product family or category or for the services or works using the given product family or category; (b) the need to ensure sufficient demand for more environmentally sustainable products; (c) the economic feasibility for contracting authorities or contracting entities to buy more environmentally sustainable products, without entailing disproportionate costs.Article 84 deleted Green public procurement
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 833 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assistguided by the Committee on Construction Products. This committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply (advisory procedure).
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 839 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission is empowered to supplement this Regulation by delegated act adopted in accordance with Article 87 in order to establish proportionate minimum penalties, targeting all economic operators, TABs and notified bodies directly or indirectly involved in the infringement of obligations of this Regulation.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 849 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) 305/2011 is repealed with effect from 1 January 2045.10 years after entry into force of this Regulation
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 858 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 a (new)
Article 93 a Prioritisation and planning 1. The Commission shall adopt by six months after entry into force of the Regulation and regularly update a working plan, covering a period of at least 3 years, setting out a list of product families or categories it intends to establish obligations and the necessary standardisation requests to be adopted in accordance with this Regulation. In the development of the working plan, the Commission shall consult the Member States, the European Parliament and the European Standardisation Organisations. 2. The Commission shall once a year report to the Member States and the European Parliament about the progress in implementing the working plan including the standardisation requests issued.
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 861 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 4
The intended life span related to basic requirements for construction works shall take into account the likely impacts of the changing climate.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 903 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part D – point 1 – introductory part
1. PWhere the information is not already provided with the declaration of performance, products shall be accompanied by the following information:
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The Union has for some time been aiming at simplifying the regulatory framework of the Common Agricultural Policy. This approach should also apply to regulations in the field of geographical indications, without calling into question the specific characteristics of each sector. In order to simplify the lengthy registration and amendment procedures, harmonised procedural rules for geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products should be laid down in a single legal instrument, while maintaining product specific provisions for wine in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, for spirit drinks in Regulation (EU) 2019/787 and for agricultural products in this Regulation. This harmonisation should be accompanied by adequate support for small producers and associations of small producers in the form of various instruments, such as the organisation by national authorities and the European Commission of tailor-made training courses on the new rules to be introduced. The procedures for the registration, amendments to the product specification and cancellation of the registration in respect of geographical indications originating in the Union, including opposition procedures, should be carried out by the Member States and the Commission. The Member States and the Commission should be responsible for distinct stages of each procedure. Member States should be responsible for the first stage of the procedure, which consists of receiving the application from the producer group, assessing it, including running a national opposition procedure, and, following the results of the assessment, submitting the application to the Commission. The Commission should be responsible for scrutinising the application in the second stage of the procedure, including running a worldwide opposition procedure, and taking a decision on granting the protection to the geographical indication or not. Geographical indications should be registered only at Union level. However, with effect from the date of application with the Commission for registration at Union level, Member States should be able to grant transitional protection at national level without affecting the internal market or international trade. The protection afforded by this Regulation upon registration should be equally available to geographical indications of third countries that meet the corresponding criteria and that are protected in their country of origin. The Commission should carry out the corresponding procedures for geographical indications originating in third countries.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) The procedures for registration, amendment and cancellation of geographical indications, including the scrutiny and the opposition procedure, should be carried out in the most efficient way. This can be achieved by using the assistance for the scrutiny of the applications provided by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). While a partial outsourcing to EUIPO has been considered, the Commission wouldshall remain responsible for registration, amendment and cancellation, due to a strong relation with the Common Agricultural Policy and to the expertise needed to ensure that specificities of wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products are adequately assessed.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 87 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
(56) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of defining sustainability standards and laying down criteria for the recognition of existing sustainability standards; clarifying or adding items to be supplied as part of accompanying information; entrusting the EUIPO with the tasks related to scrutiny for opposition and the opposition procedure, operation of the register, publication of standard amendments to a product specification, consultation in the context of cancellation procedure, establishment and management of an alert system informing applicants about the availability of their geographical indication as a domain name, scrutiny of third country geographical indications other than geographical indications under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications34 , proposed for protection pursuant to international negotiations or international agreements; establishing appropriate criteria for monitoring performance of the EUIPO in the execution of the tasks entrusted to it; laying down additional rules on the use of geographical indications to identify ingredients in processed products; laying down additional rules for determining the generic status of terms; establishing the restrictions and derogations with regard to the sourcing of feed in the case of a designation of origin; establishing restrictions and derogations with regard to the slaughtering of live animals or with regard to the sourcing of raw materials; laying down rules for determining the use of the denomination of a plant variety or of an animal breed; laying down rules which limit the information contained in the product specification for geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down further details of the eligibility criteria for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down additional rules to provide for appropriate certification and accreditation procedures to apply in respect of product certification bodies; laying down additional rules to further detail protection of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down for traditional specialities guaranteed additional rules for determining the generic status of terms, conditions for use of plant variety and animal breed denominations, and relation to intellectual property rights; defining additional rules for joint applications concerning more than one national territory and complementing the rules of the application process for traditional specialities guaranteed guaranteed; complementing the rules for the opposition procedure for traditional specialities guaranteed to establish detailed procedures and deadlines; supplementing the rules regarding the amendment application process for traditional specialities guaranteed; supplementing the rules regarding the cancellation process for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down detailed rules relating to the criteria for optional quality terms; reserving an additional optional quality term, laying down its conditions of use; laying down derogations to the use of the term ‘mountain product’ and establishing the methods of production, and other criteria relevant for the application of that optional quality term, in particular, laying down the conditions under which raw materials or feedstuffs are permitted to come from outside the mountain areas. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making35 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 34 https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/detail s.jsp?id=3983 35 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 128 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. A Union application for the registration of a geographical indication shall be submitted to the Commission electronically, through a digital system. The digital system shall have the capacity to allow the submission of applications to national authorities of a Member State, and to be used by the Member State in its national procedure. No fee shall be charged for the procedure under this Regulation.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 149 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting EUIPO with the tasks set out in this Article.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 185 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by detailed procedures and deadlines for the opposition procedure, for the official submission of comments by national authorities and persons with a legitimate interest, which will not trigger the opposition procedure and by rules on entrusting its tasks set out in this Article to EUIPO.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 262 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by provisions entrusting EUIPO with the publication of standard amendments referred to in paragraph (9).
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 285 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules entrusting EUIPO with the tasks set out in paragraph (5).
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 301 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph (1), point (b), the evocation of a geographical indication shall arise, in particular, where a term, sign, or other labelling or packaging device presents a direct and clear linkclear link is present with the product covered by the registered geographical indication in the mind of the reasonably circumspect consumer, thereby exploiting, weakening, diluting or being detrimental to the reputation of the registered name.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 327 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. A producer group shall be set up on the initiative of interested stakeholders, including farmers, farm suppliers, intermediate processors and final processors, as specified by the national authorities and according to the nature of the product concerned. Member States shall verify that the producer group operates in a transparent and democratic manner and that all producers of the product designated by the geographical indication enjoy right of membership in the group. Member States may provide that public officials, and other stakeholders such as consumer groups, retailers and suppliers, also participate in the works of the producer group. Member States may also establish credit or tax measures in favour of producers to set up the producer group proposing the registration of a geographical indication and to finance the costs of the registration procedure, as well as the costs of litigation necessary to protect the use of the geographical indications against any misuse, imitation, evocation or any other practice liable to mislead the consumer.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 347 #

2022/0089(COD)

1. Country-code top-levelThe domain name registries established in the Union may, upon the request of a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest or rightsshall, ex officio, revoke or transfer a domain name registered under such country-code top-level domain to the recognised producer group of the products with the geographical indication concerned, following an appropriate alternative dispute resolution procedure or judicial procedure, if such domain name has been registered by its holder without rights or legitimate interest in the geographical indication or if it has been registered or is being used in bad faith and its use contravenes Article 27.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 355 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance withArticle84 supplementing this Regulation by provisions entrusting EUIPO to establish andto establish the mechanism to manage a domain name information and alert system that would provide the applicant, upon the submission of an application for a geographical indication, with information about the availability of the geographical indication as a domain name and, on optional basis, the registration of a domain name identical to their geographical indication. That delegated act shall also include the obligation for registries of country-code top-level domain names, established in the Union, to provide EUIPOthe Commission with the relevant information and data.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 372 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) monitoring of the use of geographical indications in the marketplace, also online.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #

2022/0089(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 a (new)
Article 46 a Assistance and advice in relation to free trade agreements between the EU and third countries 1. At the request of a recognised producer group under Article 33, the EUIPO shall provide it with legal assistance and advice in order to support it in its actions for the safeguard of appellations of origin and geographical indications protected under this Regulation in third countries, with which the EU has concluded free trade agreements providing for the protection of appellations of origin and geographical indications. 2. For the submission of the application to the EUIPO and for the legal assistance and advice referred to in paragraph 1, no costs shall be incurred by the applicant recognised producer groups. 3. The EUIPO shall also provide for legal and advisory services during negotiations for the conclusion of free trade agreements between the EU and third countries within the meaning of Article 218 TFEU, which concern the protection of appellations of origin and geographical indications. 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting EUIPO with the tasks referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3.
2022/11/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 126 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) “victim” means any person, regardless of sex or gender, unless specified otherwise, who has suffered harm, which was directly caused by acts of violence covered under this Directive, including child witnesses of such violence;
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 135 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) initiating an attack with third parties directed at another person, by making threatening or insulting material accessible to a multitude of end-users, by means of information and communication technologies, with the effect of causing significant psychological harm to the attacked person;
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 136 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the criminal offence referred to in Article 5 is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least 8 years of imprisonment and at least 10 years of imprisonment i. If the offence was committed under aggravating circumstances referred to in Article 13, these shall be taken into account when determining the penalty.
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 137 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the criminal offence referred to in Article 6 is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least 5 years of imprisonment and at least 7 years of imprisonment i. If the offence was committed under aggravating circumstances referred to in Article 13, these shall be taken into account when determining the penalty.
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 142 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide for a limitation period for criminal offences referred to in Article 5 of at least 20 years from the time when the offence was commitdeleted.
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 143 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide for a limitation period for criminal offences referred to in Article 6 of at least 10 years from the time when the offence was commitdeleted.
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 144 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide for a limitation period for criminal offences referred to in Articles 7 and 9 of at least 5 years after the criminal offence has ceased or the victim has become aware of it.deleted
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 145 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to provide for a limitation period for the criminal offences referred to in Articles 8 and 10, of at least 7 years after the criminal offence has ceased or the victim has become aware of it.deleted
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 146 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 6
6. If the victim is a child, the limitation period shall commence at the earliest once the victim has reached 18 years of age.deleted
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 187 #

2022/0066(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 5
The limitation period shall be interrupted or suspended for the duration of pending legal proceedings concerning the offence.deleted
2023/01/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 308 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 requires financial market participants to publish, among other things, a statement on their due diligence policies with respect to the principal adverse impacts of their investment decisions. This Directive complements these requirements.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 326 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The valuesupply chain should cover activities related to the production of a good or provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of establisheddirect business relationships of the company. It should encompass upstream established direct and indirect businessdirect relationships that design, extract, manufacture, transport, store and supply raw material, products, parts of products, or provide services to the company that are necessary to carry out the company’s activities, and also downstream relationships, including established direct and indirect business relationships, that use or receive products, parts of products or services from the company up to the end of life of the product, including inter alia the distribution of the product to retailers, the transport and storage of the product, dismantling of the product, its recycling, composting or landfilling.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 339 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) As regards regulated financial undertakings providing loan, credit, or other financial services, “valuesupply chain” with respect to the provision of such services should be limited to the activities of the clients receiving such services, and the subsidiaries thereof whose activities are linked to the contract in question. Clients that are households and natural persons not acting in a professional or business capacity, as well as small and medium sized undertakings, should not be considered to be part of the valuesupply chain. The activities of the companies or other legal entities that are included in the valuesupply chain of that client should not be covered.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 433 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Companies should monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their due diligence measures. They should carry out periodic assessments of their own operations, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, minimisation, bringing to an end and mitigation of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments should verify that adverse impacts are properly identified, due diligence measures are implemented and adverse impacts have actually been prevented or brought to an end. In order to ensure that such assessments are up-to- date, they should be carried out at least every 124 months and be revised in-between if there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of adverse impact could have arisen. The evaluation must not entail excessive financial burdens for SMEs, with the possibility of providing them with a verification system based on self-declarations or predetermined forms.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 607 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) generated a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in thelast financial year preceding the last financial yearfor which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 617 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) generated a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial yearin the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of its net worldwide turnover was generated in one or more of the sectors listed in paragraph 1, point (b).
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 618 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. For the access to the EU market, companies established in a third country and falling within the scope must declare and provide proof that they comply with obligations equivalent to those laid down in this Directive in the third countries where they have their seat, a subsidiary or a branch. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt measures to set up a mechanism for the determination of equivalence of the obligations required under this Directive and for the establishment of general equivalence criteria regarding due diligence standards.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 716 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘established business relationship’ means a direct business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chain; (This amendment - meaning the reference to "direct" business relationships only - applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 730 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘valuesupply chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream establishedirect business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘valuesupply chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The valuesupply chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities; (This amendment - meaning the reference to "supply chain" instead of "value chain" - applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 830 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Member States shall ensure that parent companies have the option to fulfil the relevant obligations under this Directive, on behalf of any or all subsidiaries which meet the thresholds set forth in Article 2.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 863 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the companies update their due diligence policy annuallyevery two years.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 958 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which the company has an established business relationship, where compliance with the code of conduct or the prevention action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SME;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 987 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When contractual assurances are obtained from, or a contract is entered into, with an SME, the terms used shall be fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory. Where measures to verify compliance are carried out in relation to SMEs, the company shall bear the cost of the independent third-party verification. The company may use a verification system based on self- declarations or predetermined forms.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1034 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) neutralise the adverse impact or minimise its extent, including by the payment of the ascertained damages to the affected persons and of financial compensation to the affected communities. The action shall be proportionate to the significance and scale of the ascertained adverse impact and to the contribution of the company’s conduct to the adverse impact;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1064 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which the company has an established business relationship, where compliance with the code of conduct or the corrective action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SME;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1219 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies carry out periodic assessments of their own operations and measures, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of the extent of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments shall be based, where appropriate, on qualitative and quantitative indicators and be carried out at least every 124 months and whenever there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of the occurrence of those adverse impacts may arise. The due diligence policy shall be updated in accordance with the outcome of those assessments.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1236 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 concerning the content and criteria for such reporting under paragraph 1, specifying information on the description of due diligence, potential and actual adverse impacts and actions taken on those. The Commission shall develop simplified reporting requirements for SMEs
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1269 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and stakeholders, organisations of enterprises and representing the interests of SMEs, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, may issue guidelines, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1312 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15
1. companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), and Article 2(2), point (a), shall adopt a plan to ensure that the business model and strategy of the company are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement. This plan shall, in particular, identify, on the basis of information reasonably available to the company, the extent to which climate change is a risk for, or an impact of, the company’s operations. 2. in case climate change is or should have been identified as a principal risk for, or a principal impact of, the company’s operations, the company includes emission reduction objectives in its plan. 3. companies duly take into account the fulfilment of the obligations referArticle 15 deleted Combating climate change Member States shall ensure that Member States shall ensured to in paragraphs 1 and 2 when setting variable remuneration, if variable remuneration is linked to the contribution of a director to the company’s business strategy and long- term interests and sustainability.hat, Member States shall ensure that
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1346 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may designate the authorities fFor the supervision of regulated financial undertakings also as supervisory authorities for the purposes of this Directivethe competent authorities shall be an existing national authority already controlling or supervising financial institutions.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1388 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The national authorities supervising financial institutions shall adopt the appropriate preventive and sanctioning measures.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1433 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. In deciding whether to impose sanctions and, if so, in determining their nature and appropriate level, due account shall be taken of the company’s efforts to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its valuesupply chains, as the case may be, the severity and duration of the company's infringement and the cumulative effects of the different measures and sanctions already imposed on the company.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1445 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. When pecuniary sanctions are imposed, they shall be based on the company’s turnover, as well as on the imputability of the infringement, also taking into account the size of the undertaking.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1487 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as a result of this failure they caused an adverse impact that should have been identified, prevented, mitigated, brought to an end or its extent minimised through the appropriate measures laid down in Articles 7 and 8 occurred and led to damage.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1494 #

2022/0051(COD)

Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), it shall not be liable for damages caused by an adverse impact arising as a result of the activities of an indirect partner with whom it has an established business relationship, unless it was unreasonable, in the circumstances of the case, to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact.deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1508 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the assessment of the existence and extent of liability under this paragraph, , due account shall be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its valuesupply chains.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1526 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The civil liability of a company for damages arising under this provision shall be without prejudice to the civil liability of its subsidiaries or of any direct and indirect business partners in the valuesupply chain.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1553 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24
Member States shall ensure that companies applying for public support certify that no sanctions have been imposed on them for a failure to comply with the obligations of this Directive.Article 24 deleted Public support
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1560 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25
1. Member States shall ensure that, when fulfilling their duty to act in the best interest of the company, directors of companies referred to in Article 2(1) take into account the consequences of their decisions for sustainability matters, including, where applicable, human rights, climate change and environmental consequences, including in the short, medium and long term. 2. Member States shall ensure that their laws, regulations and administrative provisions providing for a breach of directors’ duties apply also to the provisions of this Article.Article 25 deleted Directors’ duty of care
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1570 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26
Setting up and overseeing due diligence 1. Member States shall ensure that directors of companies referred to in Article 2(1) are responsible for putting in place and overseeing the due diligence actions referred to in Article 4 and in particular the due diligence policy referred to in Article 5, with due consideration for relevant input from stakeholders and civil society organisations. The directors shall report to the board of directors in that respect. 2. Member States shall ensure that directors take steps to adapt the corporate strategy to take into account the actual and potential adverse impacts identified pursuant to Article 6 and any measures taken pursuant to Articles 7 to 9.Article 26 deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1613 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the impact of the Directive on SMEs, as well as the availability of adequate accompanying measures, supporting tools and guidelines.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 83 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In light of the structural deficiencies of the semiconductor supply chain and the resulting risk of future shortages, this Regulation provides instruments for a coordinated approach to monitoring and effectively tackling possible market disruptions. The long-term objective of the monitoring exercise enshrined under this Regulation should be a shift from crisis mitigation to crisis prevention.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Due to the complex, quickly evolving and interlinked semiconductor value chains with various actors, a coordinated approach to regular monitoring is necessary to increase the ability to mitigate risks that may negatively affect the supply of semiconductors. Member States, in close coordination with relevant stakeholders, should monitor the semiconductor value chain focusing on early warning indicators and the availability and integrity of the services and goods provided by key market actors,. The monitoring activity shall be targeted and purpose driven in such a way that it would not represent an excessive administrative burden for undertakings nor jeopardize confidentiality requirements .Information collected within the scope of this exercise shall be consistent, comparable at EU level and paced in line with evolving global developments. In this regard the Commission may provide guidance in order to avoid excessive defragmentation in the set-up of national monitoring mechanisms.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) As part of the monitoring, national competent authorities should also do a mapping of undertakings operating in the Union along the semiconductor supply chain established in their national territory and notify this information to the Commission. Strategic mapping shall complement the monitoring activity under this Regulation and should serve the objective of understanding long-term interdependencies across the supply chain.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) In order to forecast and prepare for future disruptions of the different stages of the semiconductor value chain in the Union, the Commission should, assisted by the European Semiconductor Board, identify early warning indicators in the Union risk assessment. Such indicators could include the availability of raw materials, intermediate products and human capital needed for manufacturing semiconductors, or appropriate manufacturing equipment, the forecasted demand for semiconductors on the Union and global markets, price surges exceeding normal price fluctuation, the effect of accidents, attacks, natural disasters or other serious events, the effect of trade policies, tariffs, export restrictions, trade barriers and other trade related measures, and the effect of business closures, delocalisations or acquisitions of key market actors. Member States should monitor these early warning indicators. A strong involvement of the industry in the monitoring of identified indicators should be a prerequisite for earlier qualitative assessment and simulation of potential shortages.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) The semiconductor crisis stage should be triggered as last resort in the presence of concrete, serious, and reliable evidence of such a crisis. A semiconductor crisis occurs in case of serious disruptions to the supply of semiconductors leading to significant shortages which entail significant delays and negative effects on one or more important economic sectors in the Union, either directly or through ripple effects of the shortage, given that the Union’s industrial sectors represent a strong user base of semiconductors. Alternatively or in addition, a semiconductor crisis also occurs when serious disruptions of the supply of semiconductors lead to significant shortages which prevent the supply, repair and maintenance of essential products used by critical sectors, for instance medical and diagnostic equipment.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) In order to ensure an agile and effective response to such a semiconductor crisis, the Commission should be empowered to activate the crisis stage by means of an implementing acts and for a predetermined duration period, taking into account the opinion of the European Semiconductor Board. The Commission should assess the need for prolongation and prolong the duration of the crisis stage for a predetermined period, should such a necessity be ascertained, taking into account the opinion of the European Semiconductor Board. Equally, should supply chain recovery conditions be ascertained, the Commission, in accordance with the European Semiconductor Board, should assess the possibility of ending the crisis stage and related measures in advance.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) setting up a coordination mechanism between the Member States and, the Commission as well as key market actors and relevant end user industries for monitoring the supply of semiconductors and crisis response to semiconductor shortages.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘critical sector’ means any sector referred to in the Annex of the Commission proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, the defence sector and other, activities that are relevant for public safety and security as well as any other activity or sector of strategic economic importance for Member States;
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall invite the main users of semiconductors and other relevant stakeholders to provide information regarding significant fluctuations in demand and known disruptions of their supply chain. To facilitate the exchange of information, Member States shall provide for a mechanism and administrative set-up for these updates. In doing so, Member States shall consult relevant end user industries with a view to build the necessary mechanisms on existing industry best monitoring practices.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall review the Union risk assessment including the early warning indicators as necessary, including upon indication of the European Semiconductor Board.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 188 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. During the crisis stage the Commission shall, upon request from a Member State or on its own initiative, equally assess whether advance termination of crisis stage should be considered. Where the assessment concludes that earlier termination is appropriate, the Commission may conclude activation after consulting the European Semiconductor Board.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The use of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate and restricted to what is necessary for addressing serious disruptions of vital societal functions or strategic economic activities in the Union and must be in the best interest of the Union. The use of these measures shall avoid placing disproportionate administrative burden on SMEs.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 212 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission mayshall, after consulting the European Semiconductor Board, issue guidance on the implementation and the use of the emergency measures.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission may, upon the request of two or more Member States, establish a mandate to act as a central purchasing body on behalf of the participating Member States (‘participating Member States’) for their public procurement of crisis-relevant products for certain critical sectors or strategic economic activities in the Union (‘common purchasing’).
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 219 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall, in consultation with the European Semiconductor Board, assess the utility, necessity and proportionality of the request. Where the Commission intends not to follow the request, it shall inform the Member States concerned and the European Semiconductor Board without undue delay and give reasons for its refusal.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 223 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. Procurement under this Regulation shall be carried out by the Commission in accordance with the rules set out in the Financial Regulation for its own procurement. The Commission may have the ability and responsibility, on behalf of all participating Member States, to enter into contracts with economic operators, including individual producers of crisis- relevant products, concerning the purchase of such products or concerning the advance financing of the production or the development of such products in exchange for a priority right to the result. The Commission shall keep Member States duly informed of the progress of the procurement procedure.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that respect for the rule of law entails compliance with EU primary and secondary law, andhas nothing to do with compliance with the corealleged principle of the primacy of EU law;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomesTakes note of the Commission’s second Rule of Law Report (‘the Report’) and considers that the periodic review of the state of the rule of law is of great significance and is an essential monitoring tool; welcomstresses the importance that it rightly places on justice systems; stresses that effectiveness, independence and, efficiency are threend neutrality are four characteristics of justice systems which are equally essential for upholding the rule of law and which constitute the basis for mutual trust within the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice; notes the need for lawyers, judges and prosecutors to be able to exercise their functions with full autonomy and independence, without interference from any other institution or body, in accordance with the principle of the separation of powers; argues that this is an indispensable condition for ensuring equality and the protection of citizens’ rights under the law; with regard to judges specifically, emphasises that the politicisation of some of their unions undermines their neutrality and credibility;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 39 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the fact that lawyers are now part of the EU Justice Scoreboard’s questionnaire; stresses that independent lawyers are also essential to independent justice systems; reiterates the need for lawyers and the judiciary to be highly qualified and regularly trained in the rule of law and in EU law in general, and calls on the Commission to extend the scope of its next Report to include this area;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 42 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Is deeply preoccupied by the fact that judicial independence continues to be an issue of serious concern in some Member States; cwondemns the continued political attacks on the independence of judiciary,rs why the primacy of EU law and the implementation of the CJEU’s rulings in Hungary and Poland; notes with deep regret that these attacks have been worsening since the publication of the Report and often target judges and prosecutors who have contested the backsliding on judicial independencethe Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania and Spain keep being called into question;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 49 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Defends the position that the principle of the separation of powers is essential to the proper functioning of justice systems across the EU and requires institutional structures where not only judges but also prosecution services are independent from undue political pressure;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 57 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the opinion of the Advocate General of the CJEU of 2 December 2021 to dismiss the action for annulment lodged by Hungary and Poland in March 2021 against Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget1; applauds the continued, thorough and consistent defence by the CJEU of the rule of law; _________________ 1 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget, OJ L 433 I, 22.12.2020, p. 1.deleted
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the language of the horizontal part of the Report is inadequate as regards the systematic character of the attacks on the independence of justice systems in Hungary and Poland; reiterates its calls on the Commission to provide a meaningful and easily readable comparison between the different national justice systems as regards the situation of the rule of law;deleted
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the Commission, furthermore, to make robust use of its toolkit, including infringement procedures and the conditionality mechanism, where appropriate, to quickly and efficiently address any backsliding on the rule of law in national justice systems;deleted
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #

2021/2180(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Council to resume all pending procedures under Article 7(1) TEU and to inform Parliament thereof; underlines that any further delaying of such action would amount to a breach of the rule of law principle by the Council itselfNotes the state of play at the Council with regard to the procedures under Article 7(1) TEU;
2022/01/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 26 #

2021/2166(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas better law-making must aim to serve the EU’s political ambitions, especially its long-term objectives, such as social progress and the binding objective of Union climate neutrality by 2050, and the long-term priority objective for 2050 that citizens live well, within the limits of our planet;and its Member States' political ambitions whereas sustainability should be at the heart of quality law-making, placing social, environmental and economic considerations on an equal footing;
2022/03/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 51 #

2021/2166(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the Treaties grant Parliament the direct right of initiative only in very limited cases; whereas Parliament has called for increasing its right of initiative in its resolution on Parliament’s right of initiative; whereas under the principle of parallelism of procedures, a right of initiative for the other co- legislator, the Council, should also be considered;
2022/03/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 114 #

2021/2166(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Takes note of the use of instruments such as the regulatory fitness and performance programme (REFIT) and the ‘Fit for Future’ Platform to identify opportunities for simplification and reducing unnecessary costs before the Commission proposes a revision, while scrupulously respecting the constitutional traditions of the Member States and while ensuring the highest standards of protection and enhancing compliance with EU law; recalls that the ‘Fit for Future’ platform’s role is also to assess whether specific Union legislation and its objectives remain future-proof and adapted to new challenges;
2022/03/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 7 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that Article 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union recognises civil society's role in the EU's good governance, and Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union stresses the need for the EU to have an open, transparent and regular dialogue with civil society organisations, e.g. when preparing proposals for EU laws; concludes that the EU has the most fertile legislative environment for non-profit actors to thrive;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 12 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that the survey conducted by Civil Society Europe reporting the alleged shrinking civic space in Europe, relies solely on self-assessments and perceptions of the civil society sector itself, which may make the report prone to self-report bias;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 39 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Condemns all attempts by Member States to controldiscriminate between civil society actors and discriminate between them on a political basis, including by over-regulating the sectoron a political basis;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 49 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Strongly condemns, in particular, the adoption by Hungarian and Polish authorities of acts that restrict the access of non-governmental organisations to funding and that target LGBTIQ+ persons and activists; Regrets the political decision of the allegedly impartial Court of Justice of the European Union, which has recently ruled that Hungary´s attempt to bring non-profit organisations under the scope of its national Anti-Money Laundering rules violated the free movement of capital1a; recalls that Recommendation 8 of the FATF, Europol, Eurojust, Moneyval and various reports of the European Court of Auditors2a and national competent authorities3a warn about the use of NGOs as fronts for terrorist financing or money-laundering vehicles. _________________ 1a Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 June 2020, European Commission v Hungary, C-78/18. 2a European Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 35/2018 of 18 December 2018 entitled ‘Transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs: more effort needed’. 3a 2017 Annual Report of the Maltese Commissioner for Voluntary Organisations.
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the insufficient efforts of Member States to facilitate and guarantee access to stable long-term funding for civil society actorsBelieves that the lavish funding at EU level for civil society actors might dissuade Member States from providing funding of their own; underlines that most civil society actors are exempt from anti-money laundering and transparency requirements, both at EU and national level; whereas this lack of transparency might discourage Member States from providing long-term funding;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Condemns the increasing criminalisation and judicial harassment of civil society actors; iIs concerned about the growing use of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) by powerful public and private actors, and strongly recommends the adoption of an anti-SLAPPs directivebut underlines that any legislative initiative curbing the use of SLAPPs should not exempt civil society actors from protsecuting all parties legitimately engaging in public participationon, or lead to de facto legal immunity;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 116 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Supports the Commission in launching infringement procedures against Member States that undulyUnderlines that disproportionate restrictions of the freedoms of assembly and association by Member States can lead to launching infringement procedures;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Supports the creation of an EU alert mechanism for attacks on civil society;deleted
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 134 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Denounces the extreme inequality inlack of access to information and decision- makers between industry representatives on the one hand,to the financing of civil society actors; calls therefore on the Commission to terminate the exemptions of civil society organisations and civil society actors onfrom the other, including within the EU institutionsAnti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD) and the Directive on Exchange of Information on tax information (DAC);
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #

2021/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Deplores the growing concentration of media ownership at the expense of plurality, independence and fair public representation of the ideas and actions of civil society organisations.politically undesirable ideas, such as anthropogenic climate change scepticism, mass immigration scepticism, and mass surveillance scepticism;
2021/11/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 17 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas many barriers affecting the single market derive from incorrect or incomplete application of EU legislation; whereas the effective implementation of existing EU legislation and abolition of barriers depends on both the Commission and Member States;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 22 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas continuously evolving regulatory intervention at EU level might also adversely affect the single market, creating barriers such as high compliance costs in the business environment, especially for SMEs, and legal uncertainty for individual consumers as well;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the single market remains the European Union’s greatest achievement; urges the Commission, therefore, to simplify the application of the current EU regulatory framework as well as refocus resources at issues plaguing the single market, in particular non-tariff barriers (NTBs), which continue to limit opportunities for consumers and businesses;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Regrets that in some cases EU regulations have increased social dumping and unfair competition within the single market instead of reducing them, thereby also discriminating against those companies and Member States that produce with very high social and environmental standards;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. States that the prerogative of Member States to regulate certain areas of public interest must remain unaffected, specifically in cases of multilevel governance where regions have implementing powers;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Regrets that some of the identified restrictions under the Services Directive come as a result of the legal uncertainty it has triggered since its entry into force with regard to its scope, in particular for SMEs in the tourism sector;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the insufficient use of the notification procedure under the Services Directive; calls on the Commission to reflect on improving this framework, possibly by means of a new initiative which would increase clarity and transparency on the measures that need to be notified, while remaining cautious in order to not undermine the Services Directive and avoiding the situation which led to the withdrawal of the previous proposal;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Underlines that provisions aimed at safeguarding consumers safety, working conditions and the environment as well as preserving the regional cultural heritage shall not be considered as barriers to the free movement of goods and services;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that mutual recognition of professional qualification is seriously affected by administrative barriers imposed by Member States; observes in this regard that the Commission is not reacting to unfair competition, both offline and online, which affects those sectors where Member States do not impose harmonised standards;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that the international road haulage sector is subject to a number of NTBs restricting access to national markets, which limit its competitiveness, discriminate against transport companies from certain Member States and increase emissions; calls on the Commission and Member States to abolish unnecessary restrictions on cabotage, and calls for the opento boost the realisation of the ongoing projects in the Alpine (EUSALP) macro- region, such as the Brenner tunnel; calls on the Member States not to apply, and to remove, if already in place, any additional restrictions or limitations on road haulage transport within the affected regions, during of the freight and passenger transport services sector within the EUtransitional period or afterwards due to consequences of increased freight traffic and transit;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consistently, speedily and rigorously assess whether EU and national rules hinder the internal market, and where they do, to assess if they are necessary, proportional and justified;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Observes that the incorrect enforcement of single market rules comes also as a result of obstacles encountered by Member States in transposing EU legislation on certain production sectors;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the vulnerability of consumers to whom such products are addressed and the health risk to them in the event of exposure to unsafe or counterfeit products;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 13 #

2021/2040(INI)

D b. whereas e-commerce increases consumer choice but exposes them to health risks when purchasing unsafe or counterfeit products;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that lower limit values for chemicals such as nitrosamines and nitrosatable substances set out at national level compared to those established in the TSD create inconsistencies, even when justified by the Commission; notes, however, that all EU children should enjoy the same high level of protection, in particular children with disabilities; acknowledges that this limit value cannot be amended by an implementing act but would require a legislative procedure; calls on the Commission, therefore, to adapt the limit value to the strictest value in force at national level in a revision of the TSD;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls on market surveillance authorities to strictly apply Article 19 (EU) 2019/1020 when dealing with toys, given the vulnerability of children to defective, unsafe or counterfeit products;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Highlights the importance of safeguarding children´s privacy when using connected toys and calls for data generated by such toys to be fully under parental control;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 150 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Calls for future revision of TSD to consider the impact of the use of artificial intelligence in connected toys;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) Some non-transparent commercial behaviours implemented by third countries show how trade dynamics could be also used as instruments of economic and political pressure against Member States, the European Union and its internal market.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules and procedures in order to ensure the effective protection of the interests of the Union and its Member States where a third country seeks, through measures affecting trade or investment, to coerce the Union or a Member State into adopting or refraining from adopting a particular act. This Regulation provides a framework for the Union to respond in such situations with the objective to deter, or have the third country desist from such actions, whilst permitting the Union, in the last resort, to counteract such actions and protecting the interests of the Union, the Member States and the internal market.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
— by applying or threatening to apply direct or indirect measures affecting trade or investment or the internal market.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) the political and economic dimension of the third country exercising the interference, and the previous relations it had with the European Union and its member states.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2021/0406(COD)

(a) where the economic coercion has ceasedeffectively ceased, even in its indirect forms;
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2021/0394(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. A request for conducting an oral hearing through videoconferencing or other distance communication technology may be refused by the competent authority where the particular circumstances of the case are not compatible with the use of such technology, especially where one of the parties would be at a disadvantage because of the ‘digital divide’ they would face.
2022/11/24
Committee: JURILIBE
Amendment 92 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This situation leads to the fragmentation of the internal market, decreases legal certainty for providers of political advertising services preparing, placing, publishing or disseminating political advertisements, creates barriers to the free movement of related services, distorts competition in the internal market, including between offline andbetween online service providers, and requires complex compliance efforts and additional costs for relevant service providers.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 100 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Member States should not maintain or introduce, in their national laws, provisions diverging fromin contrast with those laid down in this Regulation, in particular more or less stringent provisions to ensure a different level of transparency in political advertising. Full. The harmonisation of the transparency requirements linked to political advertisement increases legal certainty and reduces the fragmentation of the obligations that service providers meet in the context of political advertising.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The definition of political advertising should include advertising published or disseminated directly or indirectly by or published or disseminated directly or indirectly, upon financial remuneration, for or on behalf of a political actor. Since advertisements by, for or on behalf of a political actor cannot be detached from their activity in their role as political actor, they can be presumed to be liable to influence the political debate, except for messages of purely private or purely commercial nature.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The publication or dissemination by other actors of a message that is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour should also constitute political advertising. In order to determine whether the publication or dissemination of a message is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour, account should be taken of all relevant factors such as the content of the message, the language used to convey the message, the context in which the message is conveyed, the objective of the message and the means by which the message is published or disseminated. Messages on societal or controversial issues may, as the case may be, be liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 125 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is necessary to define political advertisement as an instance of political advertising. Advertisements include the means by which the advertising message is communicated, including in print, by broadcast media or via an online platforms service.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATIONDIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the transparency and targeting of political advertising (Text with EEA relevance) (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The transparency requirements should also not apply to the sharing of information through electronic communication services such as electronic message services or telephone calls, as long as no political advertising service is involved.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 163 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This situation leads to the fragmentation of the internal market, decreases legal certainty for providers of political advertising services preparing, placing, publishing or disseminating political advertisements, creates barriers to the free movement of related services, distorts competition in the internal market, including between offline andbetween online service providers, and requires complex compliance efforts and additional costs for relevant service providers.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Member States should not maintain or introduce, in their national laws, provisions diverging fromin contrast with those laid down in this Regulation, in particular more or less stringent provisions to ensure a different level of transparency in political advertising. Full. The harmonisation of the transparency requirements linked to political advertisement increases legal certainty and reduces the fragmentation of the obligations that service providers meet in the context of political advertising.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Information about the amounts spent on and the value of other benefits received in part or full exchange for political advertising services can usefully contribute to the political debate. It is necessary to ensure that an appropriate overview of political advertising activity can be obtained from the annual reports prepared by relevant political advertising publishers. To support oversight and accountability, such reporting should include information about expenditure on the targeting of political advertising in the relevant period, aggregated to campaign or candidate. To avoid disproportionate burdens, those transparency reporting obligations should not apply to enterprises qualifying under Article 3(1), (2) and (3) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 177 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) In order to allow specific entities to play their role in democracies, it is appropriate to lay down rules on the transmission of information published with the political advertisement or contained in the transparency notice to interested actors such as vetted researchers, journalists, civil society organisations and accredited election observers, in order to support the performance of their respective roles in the democratic process. Providers of political advertising services should not be required to respond to requests which are manifestly unfounded or excessive. Further, the relevant service provider should be allowed to charge a reasonable fee in case of repetitive and costly requests, taking into account the administrative costs of providing the information.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 178 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The definition of political advertising should include advertising published or disseminated directly or indirectly by or published or disseminated directly or indirectly, upon financial remuneration, for or on behalf of a political actor. Since advertisements by, for or on behalf of a political actor cannot be detached from their activity in their role as political actor, they can be presumed to be liable to influence the political debate, except for messages of purely private or purely commercial nature.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The publication or dissemination by other actors of a message that is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour should also constitute political advertising. In order to determine whether the publication or dissemination of a message is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour, account should be taken of all relevant factors such as the content of the message, the language used to convey the message, the context in which the message is conveyed, the objective of the message and the means by which the message is published or disseminated. Messages on societal or controversial issues may, as the case may be, be liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is necessary to define political advertisement as an instance of political advertising. Advertisements include the means by which the advertising message is communicated, including in print, by broadcast media or via an online platforms service.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The transparency requirements should also not apply to the sharing of information through electronic communication services such as electronic message services or telephone calls, as long as no political advertising service is involved.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) For the oversight of those aspects of this Regulation that do not fall within the competence of the supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2018/725 Member States shouldmay designate competent authorities. To support the upholding of fundamental rights and freedoms, the rule of law, democratic principles and public confidence in the oversight of political advertising it is necessary that such authorities are structurally independent from external intervention or political pressure and are appropriately empowered effectively monitor and take the measures necessary to ensure compliance with this Regulation, in particular the obligations laid down in Article 7. Member States may designate, in particular, the national regulatory authorities or bodies under Article 30 of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13 . _________________ 13 Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1).
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 232 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 66
(66) In order to fulfil the objectives of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Article 7(7) to further specify the form in which the requirements for the provision of information in the transparency notices according to that Article should be provided; and in respect of Article 12(8) to further specify the form in which the requirements of the provision of information about targeting should be provided. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations, including of experts designated by each Member State, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 239 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Information about the amounts spent on and the value of other benefits received in part or full exchange for political advertising services can usefully contribute to the political debate. It is necessary to ensure that an appropriate overview of political advertising activity can be obtained from the annual reports prepared by relevant political advertising publishers. To support oversight and accountability, such reporting should include information about expenditure on the targeting of political advertising in the relevant period, aggregated to campaign or candidate. To avoid disproportionate burdens, those transparency reporting obligations should not apply to enterprises qualifying under Article 3(1), (2) and (3) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 248 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to political advertising prepared, placed, promoted, published or disseminated online in the Union, or directed to individuals in one or several Member States, irrespective of the place of establishment of the advertising services provider, and irrespective of the means used.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 256 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) For the oversight of those aspects of this Regulation that do not fall within the competence of the supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Regulation (EU) 2018/725 Member States shouldmay designate competent authorities. To support the upholding of fundamental rights and freedoms, the rule of law, democratic principles and public confidence in the oversight of political advertising it is necessary that such authorities are structurally independent from external intervention or political pressure and are appropriately empowered effectively monitor and take the measures necessary to ensure compliance with this Regulation, in particular the obligations laid down in Article 7. Member States may designate, in particular, the national regulatory authorities or bodies under Article 30 of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13. _________________ 13 Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1).
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 261 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
2. ‘political advertising’ means the preparation, placement, promotion, publication or dissemination, by any means, of a message: upon financial remuneration, of a message by, for or on behalf of a political actor, unless it is of a purely private or a purely commercial nature, which is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 264 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 66
(66) In order to fulfil the objectives of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Article 7(7) to further specify the form in which the requirements for the provision of information in the transparency notices according to that Article should be provided; and in respect of Article 12(8) to further specify the form in which the requirements of the provision of information about targeting should be provided. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations, including of experts designated by each Member State, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) by, for or on behalf of a political actor, unless it is of a purely private or a purely commercial nature; ordeleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 268 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) which is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 278 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to political advertising prepared, placed, promoted, published or disseminated online in the Union, or directed to individuals in one or several Member States, irrespective of the place of establishment of the advertising services provider, and irrespective of the means used.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 283 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point h
(h) any natural or legal person representing or acting, according to the provisions of its governing statute, on behalf of any of the persons or organisations in points (a) to (g), promoting the political objectives of any of those.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 296 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
11. ‘political advertising publisher’ means a natural or legal person that, upon financial remuneration, broadcasts, makes available through an interface or otherwise brings to the online public domain political advertising through any medium;
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
2. ‘political advertising’ means the preparation, placement, promotion, publication or dissemination, by any means, of a message: upon financial remuneration,of a message by, for or on behalf of a political actor, unless it is of a purely private or a purely commercial nature, which is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) by, for or on behalf of a political actor, unless it is of a purely private or a purely commercial nature; ordeleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall not maintain or introduce, on grounds related to transparency, provisions or measures diverging fromin contrast with those laid down in this Regulation.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 303 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a Exemption of micro-undertakings The obligations laid down in this Regulation shall not apply to micro- undertakings qualified under art. 3 (1) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 304 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) which is liable to influence the outcome of an election or referendum, a legislative or regulatory process or voting behaviour.deleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 322 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point h
(h) any natural or legal person representing or acting, according to the provisions of its governing statute, on behalf of any of the persons or organisations in points (a) to (g), promoting the political objectives of any of those.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 333 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Political advertising publishers shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the information referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 is complete, and where they find this is not the case, they shall not make available the political advertisement.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 341 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. ‘electoral period’ means the period preceding or during or immediately after an election or referendum in a Member State and during which the campaign activities are subject to specific rules;
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 344 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
11. ‘political advertising publisher’ means a natural or legal person that, upon financial remuneration, broadcasts, makes available through an interface or otherwise brings to the online public domain political advertising through any medium;
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 348 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 19 to amend Annex I by adding, modifying or removing elements from the list of information to be provided pursuant to paragraph 2 where, in the light of technological developments, such an amendment is necessary for the wider context of the political advertisement and its aims to be understood.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 353 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
1. Member States shall not maintain or introduce, on grounds related to transparency, provisions or measures diverging from those laid down in this Regulation. 2. The provisions of political advertising services shall not be prohibited nor restricted on grounds related to transparency when the requirements of this Regulation are complied with.Article 3 deleted Level of Harmonisation
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 353 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to undertakings qualifying as micro, small and medium-sized enterprises under Article 3(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 354 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall not maintain or introduce, on grounds related to transparency, provisions or measures diverging fromin contrast with those laid down in this Regulation.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a Exemption of micro-undertakings The obligations laid down in this Regulation shall not apply to micro- undertakings qualified under art. 3 (1) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Information on how to notify political advertisements as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be user friendly and easy to access, including for people with disabilities, even from the transparency notice.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 378 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) members of a civil society organisation whose statutory objectives are to protect and promote the public interest, authorised under national or Union law;deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 388 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Any information provided under this Article shall be used only in respect of the matter for which it was requested, meaning the purpose stated in the request transmitted by the entity under paragraph 2 to the provider of political advertising services.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 401 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Information to be provided in accordance with this provision shall be presented in a format which is easily accessible and, where technically feasible, machine readable , clearly visible and user- friendly, including for people with disabilities, even through the use of plain language.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 405 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 19 to amend Annex II by modifying or removing elements of the list of information to be provided pursuant to paragraph 3(c) of this Article in light of technological developments in relevant scientific research, and developments in supervision by competent authorities and relevant guidance issued by competent bodies.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 414 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall designate competent authorities to monitor the compliance of providers of intermediary services within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [DSA] with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 to 11 and 14 of this Regulation, where applicable. The competent authorities designated under Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act] may also be one of the competent authorities designated to monitor the compliance of online intermediaries with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 to 11 and 14 of this Regulation. The Digital Services Coordinator referred to in Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx in each Member State shall be responsible for ensuring coordination at national level in respect of providers of intermediary services as defined by Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act]. Article 45(1) to (4) and Article 46(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act] shall be applicable for matters related to the application of this Regulation as regards providers of intermediary services.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 415 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Each Member State shallmay designate one or morether competent authorities to be responsible for the application and enforcement of the aspects of this Regulation not referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. Each competent authority designated under this paragraph shall structurally enjoy full independence both from the sector and from any external intervention or political pressure. It shall in full independence effectively monitor and take the measures necessary and proportionate to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 416 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Competent authorities referred to in paragraph 3, where exercising their supervisory tasks in relation to this Regulation, shall have the power to request to access data, documents or any necessary information from providers of political advertising services for the performance of their supervisory tasks.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 417 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Competent authorities referred to in paragraph 3, where exercising their enforcement powers in relation to this Regulation, shall have the power to:
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 422 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Where a provider of political advertising services is providing services in more than one Member State, or has its main establishment or a representative in a Member State but provides its main activities in another Member State, the competenteach national authority of the Member State of the main establishment or other establishmwhere the service is provided is considered to be competent or ofn the representative, and the competent asupervisory and enforcement measures. Authorities of those otherdifferent Member States shall cooperate with and assist each other aswhere necessary. Unless already regulated by Union law, that cooperation shall entail, at least, the following:a competent authority may request, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, in a substantiated, justified and proportionate manner, another competent authority, where it is better placed, to take the supervisory or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5. The relevant competent authority so requested shall, via the contact points referred to in paragraph 7 and within a timeframe proportionate to the urgency of the request provide a response or informing that it does not consider that the conditions for requesting assistance under this Regulation have been met. Any information exchanged in the context of assistance requested and provided under this Article shall be used only in respect of the matter for which it was requested.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 423 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) the competent authorities applying supervisory or enforcement measures in a Member State shall, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, inform and consult the competent authorities in the other Member State(s) concerned on the supervisory and enforcement measures taken and their follow-up;deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 424 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) a competent authority may request, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, in a substantiated, justified and proportionate manner, another competent authority, where it is better placed, to take the supervisory or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5; andeleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 425 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point c
(c) a competent authority shall, upon receipt of a justified request from another competent authority, provide the other competent authority with assistance so that the supervision or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 can be implemented in an effective, efficient and consistent manner. The relevant competent authority so requested shall, via the contact points referred to in paragraph 7 and within a timeframe proportionate to the urgency of the request provide a response communicating the information requested, or informing that it does not consider that the conditions for requesting assistance under this Regulation have been met. Any information exchanged in the context of assistance requested and provided under this Article shall be used only in respect of the matter for which it was requested.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 428 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. Contact points shall meetexchange information periodically at Union level in the framework of the European Cooperation Network on Elections to facilitate the swift and secured exchange of information on issues connected to the exercise of their supervisory and enforcements tasks pursuant to this Regulation.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 431 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. In relation to Articles 5 to 11, 13 and 14 Member States shall lay down rules on sanctions including administrative fines and financial penalties applicable to providers of political advertising services under their jurisdiction and the applicable legislation concerning data protection, where relevant, for infringements of the present Regulation, which shall in each individual case be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 437 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6
6. For infringements of the obligations laid down in Article 12, the supervisory authorities referred to in Article 51 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 may within their scope of competence impose administrative fines in line with Article 83 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and up to the amount referred to in Article 83(5) of that Regulation.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 439 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. For infringements of the obligations laid down in Article 12, the supervisory authority referred to in Article 52 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 may impose within its scope of competence administrative fines in line with Article 66 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 up to the amount referred to in Article 66 (3) of that Regulation.deleted
2022/09/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 441 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Political advertising publishers shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the information referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 is complete, and where they find this is not the case, they shall not make available the political advertisement.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 19 to amend Annex I by adding, modifying or removing elements from the list of information to be provided pursuant to paragraph 2 where, in the light of technological developments, such an amendment is necessary for the wider context of the political advertisement and its aims to be understood.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 482 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to undertakings that qualifying under as micro, small or medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 494 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Information on how to notify political advertisements as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be user friendly and easy to access, including for people with disabilities, even from the transparency notice.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 547 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Any information provided pursuant to this article may only be used in the context for which it was requested i.e. for the purpose specified in the request made to the provider of political advertising services by the entity referred to in paragraph 2.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 564 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Information to be provided in accordance with this provision shall be presented in a format which is easily accessible and, where technically feasible, machine readable , clearly visible and user- friendly, including for people with disabilities, even through the use of plain language.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 566 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 19 to amend Annex II by modifying or removing elements of the list of information to be provided pursuant to paragraph 3(c) of this Article in light of technological developments in relevant scientific research, and developments in supervision by competent authorities and relevant guidance issued by competent bodies.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 584 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall designate competent authorities to monitor the compliance of providers of intermediary services within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [DSA] with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 to 11 and 14 of this Regulation, where applicable. The competent authorities designated under Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act] may also be one of the competent authorities designated to monitor the compliance of online intermediaries with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 to 11 and 14 of this Regulation. The Digital Services Coordinator referred to in Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx in each Member State shall be responsible for ensuring coordination at national level in respect of providers of intermediary services as defined by Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act]. Article 45(1) to (4) and Article 46(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/xxx [Digital Services Act] shall be applicable for matters related to the application of this Regulation as regards providers of intermediary services.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 592 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Each Member State shallmay designate one or more competentther authorities to be responsible for the application and enforcement of the aspects of this Regulation not referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. Each competent authority designated under this paragraph shall structurally enjoy full independence both from the sector and from any external intervention or political pressure. It shall in full independence effectively monitor and take the measures necessary and proportionate to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 598 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Competent authorities referred to in paragraph 3, where exercising their supervisory tasks in relation to this Regulation, shall have the power to request to access data, documents or any necessary information from providers of political advertising services for the performance of their supervisory tasks.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 600 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Competent authorities referred to in paragraph 3, where exercising their enforcement powers in relation to this Regulation, shall have the power to:
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 617 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Where a provider of political advertising services is providing services in more than one Member State, or has its main establishment or a representative in a Member State but provides its main activities in another Member State, theeach competent authority of the Member State of the main establishment or other establishment or of the represenwhere the services are being provided shall be considered competent for applying supervisory or enforcement measures. The authorities of the different Member States shall cooperate and provide each other with support if necessary. Unless already provided for under EU law, a competent authority may request, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, in a substantive, and ated, justified and proportionate manner, that another competent authorities of those other Member States shall cooperate with and assist each other as necessary. Unless already regulated by Union law,y, where it is better placed, take the supervisory or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5; The relevant competent authority so requested shall, via the contact points referred to in paragraph 7 and within a time frame proportionate to the urgency of the request, provide a response or inform that it does not consider that the conditions for requesting assistance under this Regulation have been met. Any information exchanged in thate cooperation shall entail, at least, the following: ntext of the request for assistance and provided under this article shall only be used in the context of the matter for which it was requested.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 618 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) the competent authorities applying supervisory or enforcement measures in a Member State shall, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, inform and consult the competent authorities in the other Member State(s) concerned on the supervisory and enforcement measures taken and their follow-up;deleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 622 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) a competent authority may request, via the contact point referred to in paragraph 7, in a substantiated, justified and proportionate manner, another competent authority, where it is better placed, to take the supervisory or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5; andeleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 625 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 8 – point c
(c) a competent authority shall, upon receipt of a justified request from another competent authority, provide the other competent authority with assistance so that the supervision or enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 can be implemented in an effective, efficient and consistent manner. The relevant competent authority so requested shall, via the contact points referred to in paragraph 7 and within a timeframe proportionate to the urgency of the request provide a response communicating the information requested, or informing that it does not consider that the conditions for requesting assistance under this Regulation have been met. Any information exchanged in the context of assistance requested and provided under this Article shall be used only in respect of the matter for which it was requested.deleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 631 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. Contact points shall meetexchange information periodically at Union level in the framework of the European Cooperation Network on Elections to facilitate the swift and secured exchange of information on issues connected to the exercise of their supervisory and enforcements tasks pursuant to this Regulation.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 637 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. In relation to Articles 5 to 11, 13 and 14 Member States shall lay down rules on sanctions including administrative fines and financial penalties applicable to providers of political advertising services under their jurisdiction and under the applicable data protection legislation, where appropriate, for infringements of the present Regulation, which shall in each individual case be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 665 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19 a Transposition 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [36 months after entry into force], the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. They shall apply those measures from [36 months after entry into force]. When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 666 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. It shall apply from 1 April 2023.deleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 667 #

2021/0381(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.deleted
2022/09/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) One of the objectives of Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council11 is to guarantee the proper functioning of the internal market. Pursuant to Article 3(3), point (a), of that Directive, one of the essential requirements that radio equipment must fulfil is that it interoperates with accessories, in particular with common chargers. In that respect, recital (12) of Directive 2014/53/EU indicates that the interoperability between radio equipment and accessories such as chargers simplifies the use of radio equipment and reduces unnecessary waste and costs, in particular for the benefit of consumers and other end-users. __________________ 11 Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Since 2009, efforts have been deployed at Union level to limit the fragmentation of the charging interfaces for mobile phones and similar items of radio equipment. RSuch initiatives have already been successful to a certain extent, allowing for a shift in the number of charging solutions from thirty to only few predominant options. Nevertheless, most recent voluntary initiatives do not fully meet Union harmonisation policy objectives, which seek to reduce electronic waste (e-waste), ensure consumer convenience and avoid fragmentation of the market for charging devices.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The growing tendency for multi- device ownership along with short lifecycles of some radio equipment and the absence of clear labelling have triggered in recent years a number of problems for consumers as the inability to charge certain devices, inaccessibility to compatible charges, confusion and product safety issues, in particular for end-users affected by disabilities.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The interoperability between radio equipment and accessories such as chargers is hampered as there are different charging interfaces for certain categories or classes of radio equipment that use wired charging such as handheld mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones or headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakers. In addition, there are several types of fast charging communication protocols for which a minimum level of performance is not always guaranteed. As a result, Union action is required to promote a common degree of interoperability and the provision of clear and easy to understand information relating to the charging characteristics of radio equipment to end-users. It is therefore necessary to introduce suitable requirements in Directive 2014/53/EU regarding the charging communication protocols, the charging interface (i.e. charging receptacle) of certain categories or classes of radio equipmentradio equipment operating with power delivery of up to or less than 100 watts, as well as the information to be provided to end-users regarding the charging characteristics of those categories or classes ofoncerned radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) It is therefore necessary to harmonise the charging interface and charging communication protocols for specific categories or classes of radio equipment that areradio equipment operating with power delivery of up to or less than 100 watts and recharged via wired charging. It is also necessary to provide the basis for adaption to any future technological progress by introducing aor market development, which shall continuously be monitored by the Commission in close cooperation with Members States and relevant stakeholders. In particular the harmonisation of the charging interfaces and the charging communication protocols should in future be considered with respect to radio equipment that may be charged via any means other than wired charging including charging via radio waves (wireless charging). Such harmonisation should reducefollow a thorough impact assessment confirming that wireless charging technology or technology that uses other means than wired charging has stabilised its efficiency and use within the internal market. The future adaption of harmonisation should continue to pursue the objectives of reducing environmental waste, ensureing consumer convenience and avoiding fragmentation of the market among different charging interfaces and charging communication protocols as well as among any initiatives at national level, which might cause barriers to trade in the internal market.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Such harmonisation would be however incomplete, if it is not combined with requirements regarding the combined sale of radio equipment and their chargers and information to be provided to end- users. A fragmentation of approaches among the Member States with respect to the marketing of the categories or classes of radio equipment concerned and their charging devices would hamper the cross- border trade in those products, for example by obliging economic operators to repackage their products depending on the Member State, in which the products are to be supplied. This would in turn result in increased inconvenience for consumers and would generate unnecessary e-waste thus offsetting the benefits derived from the harmonisation of the charging interface and charging communication protocol. It is therefore necessary to impose requirements on manufacturers, at least for a transitional period, to ensure that end- users are not obligedoffered the option to purchase a new charging device with each purchase of a new mobile phone or similar item of radio equipment without a charging device. Unbundling should in future be converted to default practice provided that the Commission has established, in consultation with the Single Market Enforcement Taskforce and relevant stakeholders, that consumers are supplied with a safe and state-of-the-art common charging solution, which is not financially disadvantageous. A smooth transitioning to mandatory unbundling will foster out-of-box experiences for consumers, leading ultimately to e-waste reduction. To ensure the effectiveness of such requirements, end- users should receive the necessary information regarding the charging characteristics when purchasing a mobile phone or similar item of radio equipment. A dedicated pictogram, placed in a prominent position on the product, should enable consumers to determine whether or not a charging device is included with the radio equipment before the purchase. The above-mentioned information requirements should be displayed in case of all forms of supply, including distance selling.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) With respect to charging by means other than wired charging, divergent solutions may be developed in the future, which may have negative impacts on interoperability, consumer convenience and the environment. Whilst it is premature to impose specific requirements on such solutions at this stage, the Commission should be able to take action towards harmonising them in the future,, following a thorough impact assessment, towards harmonising them within five years of entry into force of this Directive if fragmentation on the internal market is observed.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Article 3 of Directive 2014/53/EU should be amended in order to cover charging interfaces and charging communication protocols. The categories or classes of radio equipment specifically covered by this new provision should be further detailed in a new annex to Directive 2014/53/EU.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Article 10(8) of Directive 2014/53/EU provides for information to be included in the instructions for use and so additional information requirements should be inserted in that Article. The details of the new requirements should be specified in the new annex to Directive 2014/53/EU. Those information requirements wouldCertain elements of information should also be displayed by means of visual and consumer-friendly representation. A dedicated label indicating charging capabilities and compatible chargers will enable consumers to determine the most appropriate external power supply (EPS) needed to charge their radio equipment. It should be possible to adapt thosesuch information requirements in the future in order to reflect any changes to the labelling requirements for EPS, which may be introduced under Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 . __________________ 14 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Despite this Directive not affecting product safety per se but interoperability requirements, the existence of a significant market for counterfeit charging devices raises serious concerns, particularly in regard to online and distance selling. European consumers should be able to safely purchase stand- alone charging devices online, regardless of whether these have been produced in the Union or not. Market surveillance authorities should therefore be ensured the procedural means to enforce newly introduced requirements on charging protocols and interoperability aspects, in particular towards online platforms allowing distance contracts with third- country traders.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In order to address any future developments in charging technology and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and the charging devices for such radio equipment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to amend the categories or classes ofpower delivery requirement of concerned radio equipment and the specifications regarding the charging interfaces and charging communication protocols, as well as the details on the information in relation to charging. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Inter- institutional Agreement on Better Law- Making of 13 April 201615 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 15 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Radio equipment falling within the categories or classes specified in Annex Ia, Part I shall be so constructed that it complies with the specifications on charging capabilities set out in that Annex for the relevant category or class of radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
With respect to radio equipment capable of being recharged via wired charging, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 to amend Annex Ia in the light of technical progress or market developments, and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and their charging devices, by:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) modifying, adding or removing categories or classes of radio equipment the power delivery requirement of radio equipment falling under the scope of this Directive;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) modifying, adding or removing technical specifications, including references and descriptions, in relation to the charging receptacle(s) and charging communication protocol(s), for each category or class of radio equipment concerned.’
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
With respect to radio equipment capable of being recharged via means other than wired charging, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts within five years of entry into application of this Directive in accordance with Article 44 in order to amend Annex Ia in the light of technical progress or market developments, and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and their charging devices, by:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Economic operators shall provide information whether or not a charging device is included with radio equipment referred to in Article 3(4) when such equipment is made available to consumers and end-users. Such information shall be displayed by means of visual elements and placed in a prominent position, in case of all forms of supply, on the product packaging.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
Radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4) first subparagraph shall also be accompanied by information on specifications relating to charging capabilities and to its charging device, as described in Annex Ia, Part II. In addition to being included in the instructions accompanying the radio equipment, the information shall also be displayed by means of labelling. The label shall be placed in a prominent position, in case of all forms of supply, on the product packaging. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 in order to amend Annex Ia, Part II, by introducing, modifying, adding or removing any details in relation to that information or the way that such information shall be indicated.;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point h
(a) in point (h), the words ‘information on the intended use of radio equipment’ are replaced by the words ‘the information’; is replaced by the following: ‘the information, the EU declaration of conformity or usage restrictions as set out in Article 10(8), (9) and (10) does not accompany the radio equipment or the pictogram set out in Article 3a(2) or the label set out in Article 10(8), third subparagraph, are not displayed’.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Hand-held mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakerRadio equipment falling under the scope of this Directive and operating with power delivery of up to or less than 100 watts, in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging, shall:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) be capable, in the case of charging power lower than 6100 watts, of being charged with cables which comply with the standard EN IEC 62680-1-3:2021 ‘Universal serial bus interfaces for data and power - Part 1-3: Common components - USB Type-CTM Cable and Connector Specification’.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part I – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Hand-held mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakerRadio equipment falling under the scope of this Directive and operating with power delivery of up to or less than 100 watts, in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging at voltages higher than 5 volts or currents higher than 3 amperes or powers higher than 15 watts, shall:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In recent years, credit offered to consumers has evolved and diversified considerably. New credit products have appeared, in particular in the online environment, and their use continues to develop. This has raised legal uncertainty with regard to the application of the Directive 2008/48/EC to such new products. Practices such as the use of minicredits and long-term leases have experienced unprecedented growth in recent years, often leading to abuses and unfair commercial practices where consumers have been left in a precarious financial situation, or even heavily in debt, which they could have avoided if such practices were properly regulated and if contractual information were provided in a transparent, comprehensive and timely manner.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) Advertising tends to focus on one or several products in particular, while consumers should be able to make their decisions in full knowledge of the range of credit products on offer. In that respect, general information plays an important role in educating the consumer in relation to the broad range of products and services available and the key features thereof, such as the total cost of the credit and the total amount payable by the consumer. Consumers should therefore be able at all times to access general information on credit products available. This should be without prejudice to the obligation to provide consumers with personalised pre- contractual information.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 49 a (new)
(49 a) Creditors, providers of crowdfunding credit services and insurers should not take into account the medical history of people who have been affected by cancer. Currently, five Member States have national provisions to help specific groups of people affected by cancer, under certain circumstances, to access financial services, including insurance, without reference to the risk associated with cancer. Such provisions should be implemented in all Member States. To this end, Member States should define, with the support of medical, scientific and statistical experts, the conditions determining the right to access financial services, including insurance, without reference to the risk associated with cancer. Member States should also undertake to adopt measures to inform consumers of the existence of this right. The imposition of restrictive conditions in policies, which are not based on medical, scientific and statistical data, should be avoided whenever pre-existing conditions are disclosed.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 62
(62) The consumer should have the right to discharge his or her obligations before the date agreed in the credit agreement. As provided by the Court of JusticeThe consumer should have the right to a reduction in the total cost of the credit in the event of early repayment of the credit, which includes all the costs imposed by the creditor ofn the EU Lexitor ruling,34 the right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit in the event of early repayment of the credit includes all the costs imposconsumer with the exclusion of up-front costs - in so far as they are preliminary and preparatory activities for the granting of the loan, and are fully exhausted at the time of granting the loan - that have been adequately identified and declared and the cost of third parties (e.g fee of credit intermediaries, insurance charges and taxes). As regards the method of reimbursement, the amortised cost criterion (interest curve) for the calculation of the proportional reduction of costs should apply unless it is otherwise regulated oin the consumertract taken in account. In the case of early repayment the creditor should be entitled to a fair and objectively justified compensation for the costs directly linked to the early repayment, taking into account also any savings thereby made by the creditor. However, in order to determine the method of calculating the compensation, it is important to respect several principles. The calculation of the compensation due to the creditor should be transparent and comprehensible to consumers already at the pre-contractual stage and in any case during the performance of the credit agreement. In addition, the calculation method should be easy for creditors to apply, and supervisory control of the compensation by the competent authorities should be facilitated. Therefore, and due to the fact that consumer credit is, given its duration and volume, not financed by long- term funding mechanisms, the ceiling for the compensation should be fixed in terms of a flat-rate amount. This approach reflects the specific nature of consumer credits and should not prejudice the approach in respect of other products which are financed by long-term funding mechanisms, such as fixed-rate mortgage loans. _________________ 34 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 September 2019, Lexitor, C-383/18, ECLI:EU:C:2019:702.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 65
(65) The fixing of caps on interest rates, on annual percentage rates of charge and or the total cost of the credit to the consumer is a common practice in a number of Member States. Such capping has proved beneficial for consumers. In that context, Member States should be able to maintain their current legal regime. However, in an effort to increase consumer protection without imposing unnecessary limits on Member States, caps on interest rates, on annual percentage rates of charge and or on the total cost of the credit to the consumer should be introduced throughout the Union.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 245 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(g a) credit agreements where the credit is granted free of interest and without any other charges;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 286 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5 a) Short-term, interest-free (“STIF”) credit agreement means “a fixed-sum credit agreement between a consumer (borrower) and a creditor (lender) entered into in connection with the purchase of goods or services, where the credit is granted free of interest and without any other charges and credit agreements under the terms of which the credit has to be repaid within three months and only insignificant charges are payable”.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 377 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the total amount of credit; (b) the duration of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services; (c) the borrowing rate, or all borrowing rates if different borrowing rates apply in different circumstances; (d) the annual percentage rate of charge and the total amount payable by the consumer; (e) in the case of a credit in the form of deferred payment for specific goods or services and in the case of linked credit agreements, the specific goods or services and their cash price; (f) costs in the case of late payments; (g) the type of credit;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 381 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the total amount of credit and the conditions governing the drawdown;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 384 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the duration of the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 385 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) in the case of a credit in the form of deferred payment for specific goods or services and in the case of linked credit agreements, the specific goods or services and their cash price;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) the borrowing rate, or all borrowing rates where different borrowing rates apply in different circumstances, the conditions governing the application of each borrowing rate and, where available, any index or reference rate applicable to each initial borrowing rate , as well as the periods, conditions and procedures for changing each borrowing rate;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 389 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) the annual percentage rate of charge and the total amount payable by the consumer, illustrated by means of a representative example mentioning all the assumptions used in order to calculate that rate; Where the consumer has informed the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services of one or more components of his or her preferred credit, such as the duration of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services and the total amount of credit, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services shall take those components into account;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. At the same time as the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form is provided to the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services, shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form set out in Annex II, containing the following pre-contractual information: (a) the total amount of credit; (b) the duration of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services; (c) the borrowing rate, or all borrowing rates if different borrowing rates apply in different circumstances; (d) the annual percentage rate of charge and the total amount payable by the consumer; (e) in the case of a credit in the form of deferred payment for specific goods or services and in the case of linked credit agreements, the specific goods or services and their cash price; (f) costs in the case of late payments;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 438 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Information displayed in the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and in the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form shall be consistent. It shall be clearly legible and take into account the technical constraints of the medium on which it is displayed. Information shall be displayed in an adequate and suitable way on the different channels. Any additional information which the creditor may provide to the consumer shall be given in a separate document which may be annexed to the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form or the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 445 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Any additional information which the creditor may provide to the consumer shall be given in a separate document which may be annexed to the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form or the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 460 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. If the agreement has been concluded at the consumer's request using a means of distance communication which does not enable the information to be provided in accordance with this article, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form immediately after the conclusion of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 464 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. Upon request from the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services shall, in addition to the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form, provide the consumer free of charge with a copy of the draft credit agreement, or of the draft agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, provided that the creditor at the time of the request is willing to proceed to the conclusion of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services with the consumer.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 517 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may allow creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services to require the consumer to hold a relevant insurance policy related to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services, taking into account proportionality considerations. In such cases, Member States shall ensure that the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services is required to accept the insurance policy from a supplier different to his or her preferred supplier where such insurance policy has a level of guarantee equivalent to the one the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services has proposed, without modifying the condition of the credit offering to the consumer. Under those circumstances, the insurance policy shall avoid imposing restrictive conditions, whenever specific requirements related to pre-existing medical conditions are fulfilled (such as the “right to be forgotten” criteria for cancer survivors). Member States shall guarantee that people cured of specific pathologies have equal access to insurance policies. For this purpose, Member States should define, with the support of medical, scientific and statistical experts, the conditions that determine the right to access financial services, including insurance, without reference to cancer, committing themselves to review these conditions periodically. Member States should also take measures to inform consumers of the existence of this right.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 541 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Member States shall prohibit any sale of credit to consumers, without their prior request and explicit agreement. This provision shall not apply to credit agreements concluded at point of sale to finance the purchase of a good or a service
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 552 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall require that, before concluding a credit agreement, or an agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, the creditor or, where applicable, the provider of crowdfunding credit services makes a thorough assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness. That assessment shall be done in the interest of the consumer, taking into account the nature and the risks of the credit, to prevent irresponsible lending practices and over-indebtedness, and shall take appropriate account of factors relevant to verifying the prospect of the consumer to meet his or her obligations under the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services. The obligation to assess the creditworthiness is considered fulfilled if the creditor has met the requirements provided by Directive 2013/36/EU, Regulation n. 575/2013 EU and EBA Guidelines ABE/GL/2020/06.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 558 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The assessment of creditworthiness shall be carried out on the basis of relevant and accurate information on the consumer’s income and expenses and other financial and economic circumstances which is necessary and proportionate such as evidence of income or other sources of repaymenwhich is necessary and proportionate to the nature and the risks of the credit, inform relation on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial commitmentsto nature, duration, complexity and size of the credit granted. The information shall be obtained from relevant internal or external sources, including the consumer and, where necessary, on the basis of a consultation of a database referred to in Article 19. In the case of STIF credit agreements, as referred to in Article [3 point 5a] of the current Directive , the creditors may base their creditworthiness assessment on other indicators or information as appropriate to the reduced risk levels associated with these products.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 564 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The information obtained in accordance with this paragraph shall be appropriately verified, where necessary through reference to independently verifiable documentation.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 570 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Given that STIF credit agreements (as defined in Article 3) are a relatively new and rapidly expanding market, Member States shall impose additional reporting requirements on STIF credit providers licensed in their territory including on usage levels, default rates and late fee revenues accrued. Where default rates and late fees are found to be excessively high, Member States shall take additional steps to ensure the full compliance of the STIF credit provider with the conduct rules set out in Article 38 and require remedial measures as appropriate.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 585 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States shall ensure that the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services only makes the credit available to the consumer where the result of the creditworthiness assessment indicates that the obligations resulting from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are likely to be met in the manner required under that agreement. However, a positive creditworthiness assessment should not constitute an obligation for the creditor to provide credit.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 592 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding the first subparagraphs, where the result of the creditworthiness assessment indicates that the obligations resulting from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are not likely to be met in the manner required under that agreement, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services may exceptionally make credit available to the consumer in specific and well justified circumstances.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 600 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 6
6. Where the creditworthiness assessment involves the use of profiling or other automated processing of personal data, Member States shall ensure that the consumer has the right to: (a) request and obtain human intervention on the part of the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services to review the decision; (b) request and obtain from the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services a clear explanation of the assessment of creditworthiness, including on the logic and risks involved in the automated processing of personal data as well as its significance and effects on the decision; (c) express his or her point of view and contest the assessment of the creditworthiness and the decision.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 651 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall identify, among the elements listed in paragraph 1, those which, if absent or uncertain, shall lead to the nullity of the contract, those which can be replaced by law and those which extend the period for exercising the right of withdrawal defined by article 26.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 688 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the consumer is at any time entitled to early repayment. In such cases, the consumer shall be entitled to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract. When calculating that reduction, all the costs imposed on the consumer by the creditor shall be taken into consideration, except for up-front costs, which are fully exhausted at the time of granting of the loan and corresponded to services effectively provided to the consumer or to costs effectively incurred by creditor as well as third party costs. The up-front costs should be adequately identified and declared in the credit contract. In any case, costs that remunerate credit intermediaries activities or costs that remunerate creditor’s services as well as taxes are excluded from the calculation of the reduction of the total cost of credit. As regards the method of reimbursement the amortised cost criterion (interest curve) for the calculation of the proportional reduction of costs should be used unless otherwise regulated in the contract.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 711 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. 1. Member States shall introducemay set caps on one or more of the following:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 721 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may introduce additional caps for revolving credit facilitiesThe provision of Paragraph 1 is considered fulfilled whereas there are national legislations already in force setting up caps on one of the options listed in letters a,b, c.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 796 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 46 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall also monitor the effect of the existence of the regulatory choices referred to in Article 42 on the internal market and consumers. Given that STIF credit products (as defined in Article 3) are a relatively new and rapidly expanding market, it is appropriate that the Commission gives particular consideration in its review to the further development of this market and the evidence base regarding consumer harm, and to whether the treatment of such products under this Directive needs to be revised.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 203 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
(24 a) The indication of origin is a necessary supplement to the basic traceability requirements laid down in this Regulation concerning the name and address of the manufacturer. Furthermore, the indication of the country of origin helps to identify the actual place of manufacture in all those cases where the manufacturer cannot be contacted, in particular where its given address is different from the actual place of manufacture, where the name and address of the manufacturer is missing altogether or where the address was on the packaging that has been lost. Suchinformation can facilitate the task of market surveillance authorities in tracing the product back to the actual place of manufacture and enable contacts with the authorities of the countries of origin in the framework of bilateral or multilateral cooperation on consumer product safety for appropriate follow-up actions.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) printed books and periodical different from children's books and printed periodicals;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 303 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. product’ means any item, interconnected or not to other items, suppliitem placed or made available, whether for consideration or not, in the course of a commercial activity including in the context of providing a service -which is intended for consumers or can, under reasonably foreseeable conditions, be used by consumers even if not intended for them;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 312 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. ‘safe product’ means any product which, under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use or miscorrect use, including the actual duration of use, does not present any risk or only the minimum risks compatible with the product's use, considered acceptable and consistent with a high level of protection of health and safety of consumers;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 316 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. ‘dangerous product’ means any product which does not conform to the definition of ‘safe product’, by virtue of the manner it is created, or the components with which it is manufactured, or use to which it is intended, may potentially endanger the health and/or safety of consumers;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 336 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Economic operators shall place or make available on the Union market only safe products.deleted
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Manufacturers and a natural or legal person, other than the manufacturer, that substantially modifies the product pursuant to article 12 thereof, shall place or make available on the Union market only products as defined in accordance with this Regulation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 370 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the appearance of the product and in particular where a product, although not foodstuff, resembles foodstuff and is likely to be confused with foodstuff due to its form, odour, colour, appearance, packaging, labelling, volume, size or other characteristics;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 390 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a Indication of the origin 1. Manufacturers and importers shall ensure that products bear an indication of the country of origin of the product or, where the size or nature of the product does not allow it, that indication is to be provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the product. 2. For the purpose of determination of the country of origin within the meaning of paragraph 1 of this Article, non- preferential origin rules set out in Articles 59 to 62 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, including delegated acts to be adopted pursuant to Article 62 of that Regulation, shall apply. 3. Where the country of origin determined in accordance with paragraph 2 is a Member State of the Union, manufacturers and importers may refer to the Union or to a particular Member State. 4. Manufacturers shall be authorised to indicate the country of origin in English only (‘Made in[country]’), since this is readily comprehensible for consumers.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 398 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Manufacturers shall make publicly available to consumers, communication channels such as telephone number, electronic address or dedicated section of their website, allowing the consumers to file complaints and to inform them of any accident or safety issue they have experienced with the product. These communication channels and the reporting methods shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 405 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Personal data stored in the register of complaints shall only be those personal data that are necessary for the manufacturer to investigate the complaint about an alleged dangerous product. Such data shall only be kept as long as it is necessary for the purpose of investigation and no longer than five years after they have been encoded.deleted
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 429 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Manufacturers shall ensure that their products bear a type, batch or serial number or other element allowing the identification of the product which is easily visible and legible for consumers, or, where the size or nature of the product does not allow it, that the required information is provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the product. This information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 432 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. Manufacturers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the postal and electronic address at which they can be contacted on the product or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the product. The address shall indicate a single contact point at which the manufacturer can be contacted. This information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 437 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 8
8. Manufacturers shall ensure that their product is accompanied by instructions and safety information in a language which can be easily understood by consumers, as determined by the Member State in which the product is made available. Alternatively, the instructions may be provided in a digital format. However, upon consumer’s request at the time of the purchase of the product, the instructions shall be provided in paper format free of charge. This requirement shall not apply where the product can be used safely and as intended by the manufacturer without such instructions and safety information.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 459 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) provide asupport market surveillance authority, upon its reasoned request, withand ensure that all information and documentation necessary is available for inspection by the market surveillance authority to demonstrate the safety of the product in an official language which can be understood by that authority;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Before placing a product on the 1. market importers shall ensure that the product is compliant with the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5 and that the manufacturer has complied with the requirements set out in Article 8 (4), (6) and (7). This verification also takes place taking into account the practice and characteristics of each product sector as well as the evidence, based on the same characteristics and functions, of the safety of the product.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 474 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. ITaking into account the practices and characteristics of each product sector, importers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, the postal and electronic address at which they can be contacted on the product or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the product. They shall ensure that any additional label does not obscure any information on the label provided by the manufacturer. This information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 476 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Importers shall ensure that the product they imported is accompanied by instructions and safety information in a language which can be easily understood by consumers, as determined by the Member State in which the product is made available, except where the product can be used safely and as intended by the manufacturer without such instructions and safety information. This information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 523 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the tasks referred to in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall periodically carry out sample testing ofaking into account the practice and characteristics of each product sector as well as the evidence, based on the same characteristics and functions, of the safety of the product, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall be able to provide testing documentation against harmonized standards upon request for randomly chosen products made available on the market. When the products made available on the market have been subject to a Commission decision adopted under Article 26(1) of this Regulation, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall carry out, at least once a year, for the entire duration of the decision, representative sample testing of products made available on the market chosen under the control of a judicial officer or any qualified person designated by the Member State where the economic operator is situated.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 545 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Where products are made available on the market online or through other means of distance sales by the relevant economic operators, the relevant offer of the product shall clearly and visibly indicate at least the following information to achieve parity with offline sales, such as:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 548 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) information that allow to identify the product, includingfor example its type and, when available, batch or serial number and any other product identifier;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 550 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) any warning or safety information that is to be affixed on the product or to accompany itpackaging in accordance with this Regulation or the applicable Union harmonisation legislation in a language which can be easily understood by consumers. and enable additional information to be accessible through manufacturer’s e-label. This information shall be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 574 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Online marketplaces should comply with the obligations set out in Article 10 for products they facilitate the sale of when there is no manufacturer established in the Union and no importer.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 579 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Online marketplaces shall take the necessary measures to receive and process the orders issued in accordance with this paragraph. They shall act upon receipt of the order issued without undue delay, and in any event within two working days in the Member State where the online marketplace operates, from receipt of the order. They shall inform the issuing market surveillance authority of the effect given to the order by using the contacts of the market surveillance authority published in the Safety Gatereplying via email to the notified order.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 585 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Online marketplaces shall take into account regular information on dangerous products notified by the market surveillance authorities in line with Article 24, received via the Safety Gate portal, for the purpose of applying their voluntary measures aimed at detecting, identifying, removing or disabling access to the illegal content referring to dangerous products offered on their marketplace, where applicable. They shall informprovide periodic agreed reports to the authority that made the notification to the Safety Gate of any action taken by using the contacts of the market surveillance authority published in the Safety Gate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 592 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. Online marketplaces shall give an appropriate answer without undue delay, and in any event within five working days, in the Member State where the online marketplace operates, to notices related to product safety issues and dangerous products received in accordance with [Article 14] of Regulation (EU) […/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Service Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 622 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) allowing access to their interfaces for the online tools operated by market surveillance authorities to identify dangerous productupon request, provide relevant data useful to effectively engage in market surveillance activities;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 683 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Products that have been deemed dangerous on the basis of a decision of a market surveillance authority in one Member State according to this Regulation shall be presumed dangerous by market surveillance authorities in other Member States.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 698 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. In the framework of the activities referred to in Article 28(3), point (b), market surveillance authorities may agree with other relevant authorities orand with organisations representing economic operators orand consumers to carry out activities aimed at ensuring safety and protection of consumers health with respect to specific categories of products placed or made available on the market, in particular categories of products that are often found to present a serious risk.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 710 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Member States and the Commission shall take the necessary steps to ensure that their officials and agents are required not to disclose information, different from the ones pointed out in article 31(1), obtained for the purposes of this Regulation which, by its nature, is covered by professional secrecy in duly justified cases, except for information relating to the safety properties of products pursuant to article 31(1) which must be made public in order to protect consumers.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 720 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. Consumers shall have the possibility to inform the Commission of products which may presenting a risk to consumer health and safety through a separate section of the Safety Gate portal. The Commission shall take in due consideration the information received and ensure follow up, where appropriate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 784 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [624 months after the entry into force of this Regulation].
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) There should be a financial contribution, or any other advantage provided, directly or indirectly, by the public authorities of a third country. The financial contribution or advantage may be granted through public or private entities. Whether a public entity provides a financial contribution or advantage should be determined on a case-by-case basis with due regard to elements such as the characteristics of the relevant entity and the legal and economic environment prevailing in the country in which the entity operates including the government’s role in the economy. Financial contributions or advantages may also be granted through a private entity if its actions can be attributed to the third country.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Such a financial contribution or advantage should confer a benefit to an undertaking engaging in an economic activity in the internal market. A financial contribution or advantage that benefits an entity engaging in non- economic activities does not constitute a foreign subsidy. The existence of a benefit should be determined on the basis of comparative benchmarks, such as the investment practice of private investors, rates for financing obtainable on the market, a comparable tax treatment, or the adequate remuneration for a given good or service. If no directly comparable benchmarks are available, existing benchmarks could be adjusted or alternative benchmarks could be established based on generally accepted assessment methods.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Where the Commission examines a foreign subsidy on its own initiative, it should have the power to impose redressive measures on an undertaking to remedy any distortion caused by a foreign subsidy in the internal market. Redressive measures should be proportionate and suitable to remedy the distortion at stake. They should include behavioural or structural remedies or the repayment of the foreign subsidy. This process should be transparent for the public;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The undertaking concerned should have the possibility to offer commitments in order to remedy the distortion caused by the foreign subsidy. If the Commission considers that the commitments offered fully and effectively remedy the distortion, it could accept them and make them binding by public decision.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The Commission should close the in-depth investigation by adopting a publicly accessible decision.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(2) This Regulation addresses foreign subsidies grantedconferring an advantage to an undertaking engaging in any economic activity in the internal market. An undertaking acquiring control or merging with an undertaking established in the Union or an undertaking participating in a public procurement procedure is considered to be engaging in an economic activity in the internal market.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) The European Commission´s findings of subsidies benefitting third country producers in a given sector made in relevant and recent Trade Defence Instruments (TDIs) investigations, or subsidies documented in reports published by international intergovernmental organizations shall constitute sufficient evidence of distortive subsidies to operators in the countries and sectors concerned having met the relevant threshold.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 a (new)
(6a) If an undertaking does not make commitments or take redressive measures, this may lead to exclusion from the market.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
(2) For the purpose of Article 28, a notifiable foreign financial contribution in an EU public procurement procedure shall be deemed to arise where the estimated value of that public procurement is equal or greater than EUR 25100 million.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
(2) The obligation to notify foreign financial contributions under this paragraph shall extend to economic operators, groups of economic operators referred to in Article 26(2) of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 19(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 37(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU, main subcontractors and main suppliers. A subcontractor or supplier shall be deemed to be main where their participation ensures key elements of the contract performance and in any case where the economic share of their contribution exceeds 320% of the estimated value of the contract.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
(4) The Commission may adopt a decision closing the in-depth investigation no later than 200 days after it received the notification. In exceptional circumstances, this time limit may be extended for 60 days after consultation with the concerned contracting authority or contracting entity.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 523 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) High-risk AI systems should only be placed on the Union market or put into service if they comply with certain mandatory requirements. Those requirements should ensure that high-risk AI systems available in the Union or whose output is otherwise used in the Union do not pose unacceptable risks to important Union public interests as recognised and protected by Union law. AI systems identified as high-risk should be limited to those that have a significant harmful impact on the health, safety and fundamental rights of persons in the Union and such limitation minimises any potential restriction to international trade, if any. In particular, the classification as high-risk according to Article 6 should not apply to AI systems whose intended purpose demonstrates that the generated output is a recommendation and a human intervention is required to convert this recommendation into an action.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 568 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Another area in which the use of AI systems deserves special consideration is the access to and enjoyment of certain essential private and public services and benefits necessary for people to fully participate in society or to improve one’s standard of living. In particular, AI systems that automatically generate models used to evaluate the credit score or creditworthiness of natural persons should be classified as high-risk AI systems, since they determine those persons’ access to financial resources or essential services such as housing, electricity, and telecommunication services. AI systems used for this purposeIn contrast, ancillary applications to those systems determining whether an individual should be granted access to credit, such as AI applications used for the acceleration of the credit disbursement process, in the valuation of collateral, or for the internal process efficiency, as well as other subsequent applications based on the credit scoring which do not create high risks for individuals should be exempt from the scope. AI systems used to evaluate the credit score or creditworthiness may lead to discrimination of persons or groups and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example based on racial or ethnic origins, disabilities, age, sexual orientation, or create new forms of discriminatory impacts. Considering the very limited scale of the impact and the available alternatives on the market, it is appropriate to exempt AI systems for the purpose of creditworthiness assessment and credit scoring when put into service by small-scale providers for their own use. Natural persons applying for or receiving public assistance benefits and services from public authorities are typically dependent on those benefits and services and in a vulnerable position in relation to the responsible authorities. If AI systems are used for determining whether such benefits and services should be denied, reduced, revoked or reclaimed by authorities, they may have a significant impact on persons’ livelihood and may infringe their fundamental rights, such as the right to social protection, non- discrimination, human dignity or an effective remedy. Those systems should therefore be classified as high-risk. NonethelessInfact, this Regulation should not hamper the development and use of innovative approaches in the public administration, which would stand to benefit from a wider use of compliant and safe AI systems, provided that those systems do not entail a high risk to legal and natural persons. Finally, AI systems used to dispatch or establish priority in the dispatching of emergency first response services should also be classified as high- risk since they make decisions in very critical situations for the life and health of persons and their property.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 660 #

2021/0106(COD)

(54) TIn case there are no risk management systems already in place, the provider should establish a sound quality management system, ensure the accomplishment of the required conformity assessment procedure, draw up the relevant documentation and establish a robust post- market monitoring system. Public authorities which put into service high-risk AI systems for their own use may adopt and implement the rules for the quality management system as part of the quality management system adopted at a national or regional level, as appropriate, taking into account the specificities of the sector and the competences and organisation of the public authority in question.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 752 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 80
(80) Union legislation on financial services includes internal governance and risk management rules and requirements which are applicable to regulated financial institutions in the course of provision of those services, including when they make use of AI systems. In order to ensure coherent application and enforcement of the obligations under this Regulation and relevant rules and requirements of the Union financial services legislation, the authorities responsible for the supervision and enforcement of the financial services legislation, including where applicable the European Central Bank, should be designated as competent authorities for the purpose of supervising the implementation of this Regulation, including for market surveillance activities, as regards AI systems provided or used by regulated and supervised financial institutions. To further enhance the consistency between this Regulation and the rules applicable to credit institutions regulated under Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council56 , it is also appropriate to integrate the conformity assessment procedure and some of the providers’ procedural obligations in relation to risk management, post marketing monitoring and documentation into the existing obligations and procedures under Directive 2013/36/EU. In order to avoid overlaps, limited derogations should also be envisaged in relation to the quality management system of providers and the monitoring obligation placed on users of high-risk AI systems to the extent that these apply to credit institutions regulated by Directive 2013/36/EU. With regard to use case 5(b) in Annex III, areas covered by this Regulation relate to those outlined in Article 1(a). All other procedures relating to creditworthiness assessment are covered by the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer credits . _________________ 56 Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 913 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘artificial intelligence system’ (AI system) means software that is developed witha system based on machine or human-based data and input that infers how to achieve a given set of human-defined objectives using one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generates outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing the environments they interact with;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1267 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or of a terrorist attack;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1419 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the AI system has a self-evolving behaviour, the failure of which results in an immediate hazardous condition in a specific domain, and is intended to be used as a safety component of a product, or is itself a product, covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex II;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1493 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the intended purpose of the AI systema description of the AI system, including the intended purpose, the concrete use and context, complexity and autonomy of the AI system, the potential persons impacted, the extent to which the AI system has been used or is likely to be used, the extent to which any outcomes produced are subject to human review or intervention;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1498 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) an assessment of the expotent to which anial benefits provided by the use of the AI system, has been used or is likely to be usedwell as reticence risk and/or opportunity costs of not using the AI for individuals, groups of individuals, or society at large. This includes weighing the benefits of deploying the AI system against keeping the status quo;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1505 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the extent to which the use of an AI system has already causedan assessment of the probability of worst-case scenario, likelihood and severity of harm, to the health and safety or adverse impact on the fundamental rights or has given rise to significant concerns in relation to the materialisation of such harm or adverse impact, as demonstrated by reports or documented allegations submitted to national competent authorities; fundamental rights of potentially impacted persons and its irreversibility, including: (i) the extent to which the AI system has already been evaluated and proven to have caused material harm as demonstrated by studies or reports published by the national competent authorities; (ii) the extent to which potentially impacted persons are dependent on the outcome produced from the AI system, in particular because of practical or legal reasons it is not reasonably possible to opt-out from that outcome; (iii) the extent to which the outcome produced by the AI system is easily reversible; (iv) the extent to which potentially impacted persons are in a vulnerable position in relation to the user of the AI system, in particular due to an imbalance of power, knowledge, economic or social circumstances, or age.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1512 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the potential extent of such harm or such adverse impact, in particular in terms of its intensity and its ability to affect a plurality of persons;measures taken to address or mitigate the identified risks, including to the extent existing Union legislation provides for: (i) effective measures of redress in relation to the risks posed by an AI system, with the exclusion of claims for damages; (ii) effective measures to prevent or substantially minimise those risks.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1515 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the extent to which potentially harmed or adversely impacted persons are dependent on the outcome produced with an AI system, in particular because for practical or legal reasons it is not reasonably possible to opt-out from that outcome;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1522 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the extent to which potentially harmed or adversely impacted persons are in a vulnerable position in relation to the user of an AI system, in particular due to an imbalance of power, knowledge, economic or social circumstances, or age;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1524 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the extent to which the outcome produced with an AI system is easily reversible, whereby outcomes having an impact on the health or safety of persons shall not be considered as easily reversible;deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1537 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) the extent to which existing Union legislation provides for: (i) effective measures of redress in relation to the risks posed by an AI system, with the exclusion of claims for damages; (ii) effective measures to prevent or substantially minimise those risks.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1554 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall comply with the requirements established in this Chapter, taking into account the generally acknowledged state of the art and industry standards, including as reflected in relevant harmonised standards or common specifications.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1622 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) elimination or reduction of risks as far as possireduction of identified and evaluated risks as far as commercially reasonable and technologically feasable through adequate design and development;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1623 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) where appropriate, implementation of adequate mitigation and control measures in relation to risks that cannot be eliminadeleted;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1643 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. High-risk AI systems shall be tesevaluated for the purposes of identifying the most appropriate and targeted risk management measures. Testing shall ensure that high-risk AI systems perform consistently for their intended purpose and they are in compliance with the requirements set out in this Chap and weighing any such measures against the potential benefits and intended goals of the systerm.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1717 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. THigh risk AI systems should be designed and developed with the best efforts to ensure that, where appropriate, training, validation and testing data sets shall beare sufficiently relevant, representative, free of errors and complete and appropriately vetted for errors. They shall have the appropriate statistical properties, including, where applicable, as regards the persons or groups of persons on which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. These characteristics of the data sets may be met at the level of individual data sets or a combination thereof.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1744 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The training, testing and validation processes of data sets should have a duration based on the training periodicity of the systems, the timing of notification of incidents and the normal supervisory activity of the national competent authority
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1751 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The technical documentation shall bevary according to each use of the AI system and drawn up in such a way to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements set out in this Chapter and provide national competent authorities and notified bodies with all the necessary information to assess the compliance of the AI system with those requirements. It shall contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex IV or in the case of SMEs and start-ups, any equivalent documentation meeting the same objectives, subject to approval of the competent national authority.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1780 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. For high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1, point (a) of Annex III, the logging capabilities shall provide, at a minimum: (a) recording of the period of each use of the system (start date and time and end date and time of each use); (b) the reference database against which input data has been checked by the system; (c) the input data for which the search has led to a match; (d) the identification of the natural persons involved in the verification of the results, as referred to in Article 14 (5).deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1820 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Human oversightThe degree of human oversight shall be adapted to the specific risks, the level of automation, and context of the AI system and shall be ensured through either one or all of the following measures:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1911 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. ProvidIn case there are no risk management systems already in place, providers and users of high-risk AI systems shall puimplement a quality management system in place thato ensures compliance with this Regulation and corresponding obligations. That system shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions, and shall include at least the following aspects:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1926 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) systems and procedures for data management, including data collection, data analysis, data labelling, data storage, data filtration, data mining, data aggregation, data retention and any other operation regarding the data that is performed before and for the purposes of the placing on the market or putting into service of high-risk AI systems, and after deployment of the high-risk AI;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1941 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. The implementation of aspects referred to in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate to the size of the provider’s and user's organisation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2135 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. Where harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 and international standards do not exist or where the Commission considers that the relevant harmonised standards are insufficient or that there is a need to address specific safety or fundamental right concerns, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt common specifications in respect of the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 74(2).
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2142 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, when preparing the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, shall gather the views of relevant bodies, stakeholders or expert groups established under relevant sectorial Union law.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2174 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where, in demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, the provider has not applied or has applied only in part harmonised standards referred to in Article 40, or where such harmonised standards do not exist and common specifications referred to in Article 41 are not available, the provider shall follow the conformity assessment procedure set out in Annex VII. Should the provider already have established internal organisation and structures for existing conformity assessments or requirements under other existing rules, the provider may utilise those, or parts of those, existing compliance structures, so long as they also have the capacity and competence needed to fulfil the requirements for the product set out in this Regulation.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 116 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The manufacturer or the manufacturer’s authorised representative should also ensure that a risk assessment is carried out for the machinery product, which the manufacturer wishes to place on the market. For this purpose, the manufacturer should determine which of the essential health and safety requirements that are applicable to the machinery product and in respect of which measures must be taken to address the risks that the machinery product may present. Where the machinery product integrates an artificial intelligence system, the risks identified during the risk assessment should include thosean appropriate guideline should be developed, in order to correctly evaluate possible further risks that may appear during the machinery product’s lifecycle due to an intended evolution of its behaviour to operate with varying levels of autonomy. In this respect, where the machinery product integrates an artificial intelligence system, the risk assessment for the machinery product should consider the risk assessment for thatThe guideline defining risk assessment procedures for the machinery including AI should also take into account the risk assessment (and related terminology and risk levels) for artificial intelligence system that has been carried out pursuant to Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council23 . __________________ 23 + OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Regulation contained in document ….
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45 a (new)
(45a) Nevertheless, provisions set out in Articles 5(1) and 21(2) of this Regulation should apply only to AI systems with self- determining, evolving behaviour during normal operation. On the contrary, they should not apply to conventional software not capable to learn or evolve and programmed only to execute certain automated functions of machinery products.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) agricultural and forestry vehicletractors, as well as systems, components, separate technical units, parts and equipment designed and constructed for such vehicles, that fall within the scope of application of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, with the exclusion of machinery mounted on those vehicles;
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
(f) an assembly as referred to in points (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) missing only the upload of a software intended for itsthe specific application foreseen by the manufacturer and which is the subject of the conformity assessment procedure of the machinery product.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
(15) ‘artificial intelligence system’ means an artificial intelligence system as defined in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council28; , and that only applies to artificial intelligence systems with self- determining, evolving behaviour or logic during normal operation; __________________ 28 + OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Regulation contained in document … and insert the number, date, title and OJ reference of that Regulation in the footnote."
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Where machinery products contain an artificial intelligence system, to which the essential health and safety requirements of Regulation (EU) …/… apply, this Regulation shall, in relation to that artificial intelligence system, only apply with regard to its safe integration into the overall machinery and only applies to artificial intelligence systems with self- determining, evolving behaviour or logic during normal operation, so as not to compromise the safety of the machinery product as a whole.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing technical specifications for the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex III where the following conditions have been fulfilled: (a) no reference to harmonised standards covering the relevant essential health and safety requirements is published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012; (b) or more European standardisation organisations to draft a harmonised standard for the essential health and safety requirements and there are undue delays in the standardisation procedure or the request has not been accepted by any of the European standardisation organisations. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 46(3).deleted the Commission has requested one
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 253 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The EU declaration of conformity shall have the model structure set out in Annex V, shall contain the elements specified in the relevant modules set out in Annexes VI, VII, VIII and IX and shall be continuously updated. It shall be translated into the language or languages required by the Member State in which the machinery product is placed on the market or is made available on the market.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 24
24. SoftwareThe safety component software of AI systems ensuring safety functions, including AI systems.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 25
25. Machinery embedding AI systems ensuring safety functions.deleted
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 332 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 18
18. Software of AI systems ensuring safety functions, including AI systems.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 339 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.2 – point e
(e) A machinery product shall be designed and constructed in such a way that it is possible for the user to test the safety functions, and the where applicable. A machinery product shallmust be supplied with all the special equipment and accessories, and where appropriate, with the description of specific functional test procedures, essential to enable it to be tested, adjusted, maintained and used safely.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 347 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.6 point f
(f) adapting a machinery product with intended fully or partially evolving behaviour or logic that is designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy to respond to people adequately and appropriately (verbally through words and non-verbally through gestures, facial expressions or body movement) and to communicate its planned actions (what it is going to do and why) to operators in a comprehensible manner.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 354 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.9 – paragraph 2
A hardware component relevant for connection or access to software that is critical for the compliance of the machinery product with the relevant health and safety requirements shall be designed so that it is adequately protected against accidental or intentional corruption. The machinery product shall collect evidence of a legitimate or illegitimate intervention in the aforementioned hardware component, when relevant for connection or access to software that is critical for the compliance of the machinery product.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 363 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) they can reasonably withstand, where appropriate to the circumstances and the risks, the intended operating stresses and intended and unintended external influences, including known malicious attempts from third parties to create a hazardous situation;
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.7 – paragraph 5
The machinery product with fully or partially evolving behaviour or logic that is designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy shall be adapted to respond to people adequately and appropriately (verbally through words or nonverbally through gestures, facial expressions or body movement) and to communicate its planned actions (what it is going to do and why) to operators in a comprehensible manner.deleted
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 383 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.6 – point 1.6.2 – paragraph 2
In the case of machinery into which persons shall enter for operation, adjustment, maintenance or cleaning, the machinery accesses shall be dimenesiogned and adapted for the use of rescue equipment in such a way that a timely rescue of the persons is guaranteedtaking emergency rescue into consideration.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.7 – point 1.7.4 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) mark on the machinery product andor in an accompanying paper how to access the digital instructions;
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.1 – point 3.1.1 – point b
(b) ‘Driver’ means a person responsible for the movement of a machine, who may be transported by the machinery or may be on foot, accompanying the machinery, or may guide the machinery by remote control or may remotely supervise the autonomous mobile machinery product regardless of the distance and the means of control communication.deleted
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 401 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.1 – point 3.1.1 – point b a (new)
(ba) ‘Driver’ means an operator responsible for the movement of a machine. The driver may be transported by the machinery or may be on foot, accompanying the machinery, or may guide the machinery by remote control.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 408 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2
A visual or audible signal shall be provided at the driving position alertingto warn the driver when he is in the driving position and not using the restraint system is not active.
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 420 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.5 – point 3.5.4 – paragraph 2
When the risk of contact or electric arc with an energised overhead power line cannot be fully avoided, mobile machinery products shall be designed, constructed and equipped in such a way that all hazards of an electrical nature are prevented or can be prevented in the event of contact or electrical arc with an energized power line.deleted
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part A – paragraph 2 – point n
(n) the source code or programmed logic of the safety related software to demonstrate the conformity of the machinery product with this Regulation further to a reasoned request from a competent national authority provided that is necessary in order for those authorities to be able to check compliance with the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex III;deleted
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital (14)
(14) In order to allow for the development of a more efficient, integrated and competitive market for roaming services, there should be no restrictions preventing undertakings from effectively negotiating wholesale access for the purpose of providing roaming services. Obstacles to access to such wholesale roaming services, due to differences in negotiating power and in the degree of infrastructure ownership of undertakings, should be removed. To that end, wholesale roaming access agreements should respect the principle of technology neutrality and ensure all operators an equal and fair opportunity to accessing all networks and technologies available and be negotiated in good faith allowing the roaming provider to offer where possible retail roaming services equivalent to the services offered domestically. Mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and resellers of mobile communication services without their own network infrastructure typically provide roaming services based on commercial wholesale roaming agreements with their host mobile network operators in the same Member State. Commercial negotiations, however, may not leave enough margin to MVNOs and resellers for stimulating competition through lower prices. The removal of those obstacles and balancing the negotiation power between MVNOs/resellers and mobile network operators by an access obligation and wholesale caps should facilitate the development of alternative, innovative and Union-wide roaming services and offers for customers. Directive (EU) 2018/1972 does not provide for a solution to this problem via the imposition of obligations on operators with significant market powers.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Therefore an obligation to meet reasonable requests for wholesale access to public mobile communications networks for the purpose of providing roaming services should be laid down . Such access should be in line with the needs of those seeking access. End-users of services requiring modern technologies and retail roaming services should be able to enjoy, where possible, the same quality of service when roaming as domestically. A wholesale roaming access obligation should therefore ensure that access seekers can replicate the retail services offered domestically, unless mobile network operators requested to provide access can prove that it is technically unfeasible to do so. Access should be refused only on the basis of objective criteria, such as technical feasibility and the need to maintain network integrity. Where access is refused, the aggrieved party should be able to submit the case for dispute resolution in accordance with the procedure set out in this Regulation. In order to ensure a level playing field, wholesale access for the purpose of providing roaming services should be granted in accordance with the regulatory obligations laid down in this Regulation applicable at the wholesale level and should take into account the different cost elements necessary for the provision of such access. A consistent regulatory approach to the wholesale access for the provision of roaming services should contribute to avoiding distortions between Member States. BEREC should, in coordination with the Commission and in collaboration with the relevant stakeholders, issue guidelines for wholesale access for the purpose of providing roaming services.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital (29)
(29) Roaming providers should be able to apply a ‘fair use policy’ to the consumption of regulated retail roaming services provided at the applicable domestic retail price. The ‘fair use policy’ is intended to prevent abusive or anomalous usage of regulated retail roaming services by roaming customers, such as the use of such services by roaming customers in a Member State other than that of their domestic provider for purposes other than periodic travel. Roaming providers should, in cases of force majeure caused by circumstances such as pandemics or natural catastrophes which involuntarily extend the period of temporary stay of the roaming customer in another Member State, consider extending the applicable fair use allowance for an appropriate period, upon a justified request by the roaming customer . Any fair use policy should enable the roaming provider’s customers to consume volumes of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic retail price that are consistent with their respective tariff plans.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) A contract which includes any type of regulated retail roaming service should specify the characteristics of that regulated retail roaming service, including the expected level of quality of serviceclear and comprehensible information on the expected level of quality of service. Such information should be provided in line with BEREC’s retail roaming guidelines. The provider should make available information on relevant factors that can affect the quality of service, such as availability of certain technologies, coverage or variation due to external factors such as topography.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Roaming customers and home operators sometimes unwittingly incur large bills as a result of the lack of transparency on the numbers used for value added services across the Union and on the wholesale prices charged for value added services. Communications to certain numbers which are used for providing value added services, for example, premium-rate numbers, freephone numbers or shared cost numbers, are subject to particular pricing conditions at the national level. This Regulation should not apply to the part of the tariff that is charged for the provision of value added services but only to the tariffs for the connection to such services. Nevertheless, the RLAH principle might create an expectation for end-users that communications to such numbers while roaming should not incur any increased cost in comparison to the domestic situation. However, this is not always the case when roaming. End-users are confronted with increased costs, even when they call numbers that are free when called domestically. This could erode customers’ confidence in using their phones when roaming and could result in bill shocks, thus having a negative impact on a genuine RLAH experience. This is mainly caused, at retail level by the insufficient level of transparency on the higher charges which can be incurred because of communications to value added services numbers. Therefore measures should be introduced to increase the transparency on the conditions for communications to value added services numbers. To that end, roaming customers and roaming customers living with a disability should be informed in their contract and notified and warned, in a timely manner and free of charge, that communications to value added services numbers in roaming can entail additional charges.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) In order to improve the transparency of retail prices for roaming services and to help roaming customers make decisions on the use of their mobile devices while abroad, providers of mobile communication services should supply their roaming customers with information free of charge on the roaming charges applicable to them when using roaming services in a visited Member State. Since certain customer groups might be well informed about roaming charges, roaming providers should provide a possibility to easily opt-out from this automatic message service. In addition, roaming customers should be provided with a text message including a link to a web page giving detailed information about the types of services (calls and SMS) that may be subject to increased costs. Such communications should be guaranteed and easily accessible for roaming customers living with a disability. Moreover, providers should actively give their customers, provided that the latter are located in the Union, on request and free of charge, additional information on the per- minute, per-SMS or per-megabyte data charges (including VAT) for the making or receiving of voice calls and also for the sending and receiving of SMS, MMS and other data communication services in the visited Member State.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) clear and comprehensible information on the quality of service that can reasonably be expected when roaming in the Union, including in particular information on the speed and potential limitation to the transmission of data.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #

2021/0045(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Roaming providers shall, except when the roaming customer has notified the roaming provider that he does not require this service, provide the customer, automatically by means of a Message Service, without undue delay and free of charge, when the roaming customer enters a Member State other than that of his domestic provider, with information on the potential risk of increased charges due to the use of value added services including a link to a dedicated webpage providing information about the types of services that may be subject to increased costs and, if available, information on value added services number ranges. Such communications shall be guaranteed and easily accessible in particular for roaming customers living with a disability.
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the aim of the Farm to Fork Strategy is to establish a sustainable, healthy and resilient food system which benefits consumers in the EU; recalls the importance of an overall impact assessment to make sure that any legislative measure is without prejudice to the EU internal market;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the aim of the Farm to Fork Strategy is to establish a local, sustainable, healthy and resilient food system which benefits consumers in the EU;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 27 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that promoting healthy and sustainable food consumption calls for changesinvolves paying attention to diets, production systems and, internal trade and promoting public food education campaigns starting from primary schools;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to step up its support for regional food systems and short supply chains, which act as a source of fresh, sustainable and better quality products for consumers; takes the view that legislation on European public procurement should be revised in order to foster local, high-quality food supply systems; underlines the fundamental role of public administrations in the collective catering sector, in which priority should be given to organic, traditional, typical products, products with geographical indication and from a short supply chain;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that local, national or European preference in public tenders for food (canteens, hospitals, etc.) should be encouraged;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to make it easier for quality products from micro- enterprises to access local markets;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Supports the establishment of a governance framework and a code of conduct for food and retail businesses, in order to make them accountable and aware of the importance of sustainability and health; recalls the importance of effective application of the Directive on unfair practices in the agri-food chain;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomAcknowledges the Commission’s initiative to promote healthier diets by introducing nutritional profiles, accompanied by mandatovoluntary and harmonised labelling of the nutritional value of foods on the front of packaging; underlines however that front-of-pack labelling schemes as Nutri-Score, not based on actual portions of consumption, mislead consumers, influencing their choices on the basis of simplistic and distorted judgments that consistently lack nutrition- specific information;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomAcknowledges the Commission’s initiative to promote healthier diets by introducing nutritional profiles, accompanied by mandatthrough consumer education campaigns and actions that inforym and harmonised labelling of the nutritional vabout the importance of a varied and balanced diet, which does not exclude ofany food as lon the front of packagingg as it is consumed in the right quantities and frequencies and which is accompanied by adequate physical activity;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the key to pursue the objective of healthier diets should be providing clear and correct information to consumers, not influencing their food choices with distortive claims on nutritional values; it further underlines that nutrition labelling schemes could be detrimental to some products that benefit from an indication of origin;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Supports the Commission's proposal to introduce a harmonized front- pack labelling system (FOP) based on solid scientific evidence and supported by accurate impact assessments, a scheme based on the principles of Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 1169/2011, voluntary, informative and non-discriminatory;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regards it as essential, further, to keepsafeguard consumers better informed by introducing mandatory origin labelling of food, which would be broadened to cover animal welfare, sustainability and pesticide residue levels’ right to complete information for a conscious and safe choice by introducing mandatory origin labelling of food and the need to evaluate, in the context of the labelling of products of animal origin, an indication on the animal welfare, sustainability and pesticide residue levels; stresses in any case that every initiative in this sense should be subject to the need to safeguard the European livestock market;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regards it as essential, further, to keep consumers better informed by introducing mandatory ingredient origin labelling of processed and unprocessed food, which would be broadened to cover animal welfare, sustainability and pesticide residue levels;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the importance of extending the indication of origin labelling, including that of primary ingredients, to all agricultural supply chains; stresses that the indication of origin requirement should be made uniform throughout the EU internal market in such a way that is sustainable for the entire agri-food chain;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Considers that the clear and mandatory origin labelling of food should indicate a precise place of origin in the Member State or third country concerned;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Supports the Commission in its efforts to combat food fraud, which misleads consumers and distorts competition in the internal market, and regards it as essential to make the penalties imposed on fraudsters more dissuasive and to earmark sufficient resources so that checks can be stepped up and legally define at EU level the concepts of “Fraud and Agri-food Crime” and that of “Sounding”;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Recalls that the tools of the Farm to Fork Strategy could be profitable for the European market only if environmental and social sustainability are placed at the core of the EU trade policy in relation to agreements with third Countries;
2021/01/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls the importance of safeguarding consumers' right to a conscious and safe choice by promoting tools that will ensure the highest level of transparency about the composition and origin of products;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that the significant state aid support related to the COVID-19 crisis by some Member States has resulted in a substantial variation in state aid intensity across the EU internal market; strongly encourages the Commission to ensure a balanced application of state aid schemes in order to avoid asymmetries that could endanger free and fair competition in the internal market;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Encourages the adoption of measures to strengthen European start- ups and SMEs as a means of supporting their competitiveness with non-EU ones, in accordance with the level playing field principle; stresses the need of a proper application of competition policy to third- country companies operating in the EU internal market;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and Member State authorities to combat tax evasion and abuses of dominant positions by non-European businesses active on the market for algorithmic systems for personal-data analysis;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to create a single European data space with the aim of ensuring the free flow of non-personal data across borderall Member States and sectors; underlines the principle of the free flow of non-personal data as imperative for a single market for data, providing a level playing field for data sharing between stakeholders; considers that business-to- business (B2B) and business-to- government (B2G) data sharing should be voluntary, while mandatory access to data should also be envisaged to remedy potential market failures relating to the monopoly exercised by particular third- country actors;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises how important it is that European citizens’ personal data should preferably be processed in Europe;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Points to the unique nature of certain personal data, such as health data, children’s data and intimate private data, e.g. sexual preferences or personal photos; stresses that anonymisation of such data should be guaranteed and that storage or analysis thereof outside the European Union should not be authorised;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Considers that a Member State should be able to oblige cloud service providers and digital businesses operating in the European Union, whether located in the European Union or in a third country, to provide access to any relevant personal data relating to terrorism, even if stored in a third country;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that the development of a European industrial and technological base requires the introduction of a European preference for local or European production in digital procurement in Europe;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that any authorisation by a contracting authority for economic operators from countries outside the European Union or the European Economic Area to participate in a procedure for the award of digital contracts, such as for cloud services, must take into account, inter alia, the imperatives of information and supply security, the safeguarding of defence and state security interests, the interest in developing a European digital industrial and technological base, and reciprocity requirements;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2020/2217(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Points to the need to protect European subcontractors and producers of critical digital components, applications or systems in view of the predatory approach of third-country businesses;
2020/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas artificial intelligence (AI) can offers many benefits but also presents certain risks;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes the EU needs to become a world leader in digital innovation; considers that the digital single market is about removing national barriers and having a better organised and common European approach for market integration and harmonisation; believes that further actions are needed at both Member State and EU level to achieve this;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to follow the ‘one in, one out’ principle in its future legislative proposals, and to address the fragmentation of the digital single market, remove any existing unjustified barriers, and support innovation by reducing red tape;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that substantial investment in AI and other key new technologies is required; calls for NextGenerationEU, as well as public and private funding, to increase investment so as to reflect the EU’s ambition of becomstrengthen and improve the EU’s standing at global technological leader and reaping the full benefits of digitalisationlevel;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that we need a data economy that works for the entire EU, as it is a key enabler of digitalisation; believes that it is important for the EU to guarantee a high degree of control over data, with clear and balanced rules on intellectual property rights (IPR), but considers it essential to maintain openness towards third countries, and that the free flow of non-personal data across borders is important;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Strongly bBelieves that AI can be a force for goodplay a positive role for all European citizens, and offer significant benefits and value for the economy, safety, security, education, healthcare, transport and the environment; believes the security, inclusiveness, accessibility and fairness, especially for groups in vulnerable situations, of AI- driven products and services need to be ensured;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that while AI offers greatood potential, it can also present certain risks due to issues such as bias and opacity;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that the development of a voluntary labelling scheme for trustworthy AI, based on clear and common guidance drawn up by the Commission, could help improve consumer trust involving all relevant stakeholders and based on transparent standards could help improve consumer trust; this labelling could notably include information on safety aspects, such as a safety score, and minimum age requirements;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2020/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Highlights the importance of education and research for AI; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish an EUrengthen and enhance existing centres of excellence for AI; considers that this should be done with the involvement of universities, companies and research institutions; believes that such a centre can help to provide specialised training and development for regulatory authoritie such as the European Artificial Intelligence Networks;
2021/01/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reaffirms that sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) areis grounded in human rights, arend is a fundamental elements of human dignity, and remain crucial to achieving gender equality;
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the problem of pregnant women left alone continues to be present and unsolved. The economic, psychological and social help to these mothers must become a goal to be achieved, in order not to leave them abandoned to themselves and without the possibility of choosing life;
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that safe and legal abortion care is anchored in women’s health and rights; wWarns about the worrying backlash on women’s rights over their bodies in both developing countries and the EU; stresses the need for the full implementation of the Maputo Protocol, especially Article 14;
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 70 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EU to secure adequate and well-targeted funding for SRHR in its development cooperation policy;deleted
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 82 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises that SRHR services should be gender-responsive, rights-based, youth-friendly and available to all, regardless of age or marital status, including during conflicts and disasters;
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 103 #

2020/2215(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that asylum seekers and refugees are too often victims of human trafficking and forced prostitution; insists that, in general, there should be an opposition and fight against human trafficking, and that specifically an access to SRHR for these peopulations le is critical for their survival.
2020/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 9 #

2020/2131(INI)

2. Stresses that the implementation of the SME strategy should focus on supporting SMEs to help them maintaand reacting their existence, as the COVID-19 crisis has delivered a shock to many SMEs and their role in the everyday life of Europeanso the COVID-19; micro and SMEs should be considered an essential asset in the post- COVID 19 transition;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that SMEs should be burdened as little as possible and encourages the Commission to use strong enforcement action to ensure that the single market benefits all businesses and consumers and to counter gold-plating and other regulatory restrictions; recalls that in the post-COVID recovery further market deregulation should be harmonised with workers’ rights protection;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses Member States to avoid practices of unfair competition inside the internal market, as they could seriously affect micro and SMEs and consumer rights;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Highlights that unfair competition usually driven by extra - UE companies is very detrimental to the European SMEs, especially in the post-COVID recovery; efficient trade defence instruments should be accessible to SMEs and they should avoid unfair practices from third countries;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls that an effective “green” approach, favourable to SMEs, should avoid imposing extra burdens on SMEs while allowing imports from third countries which are not respecting free trade and “green” standards;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the crucial role of data as the lifeblood of the digital economy; supports the Commission in establishing European data spaces for trusted and secure data sharing to ramp up data flows between businesses and with governments; recalls that digital trainings and upskilling and reskilling programs for entrepreneurs and employees could support the recovery of SMEs and foster their competitiveness in the EU market;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to simplify procurement tendering processes by using the flexibility of the EU’s new procurement framework and to enhance opportunities for SMEs by using digital tools and platforms to expand cross-border procurement; stresses that green public procurement and a simplified access to tenders can make an important contribution to building a sustainable economy; where possible, calls for preferring European micro and SMEs in public tenders;
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights the importance of family -run and family-owned businesses, as the backbone of local economies; they create wealth, provide jobs, are locally rooted and connected to local communities; underlines that family businesses make up more than 60% of all companies in Europe, they range from sole proprietors to large international enterprises; big or small, listed or un- listed, family businesses play a significant role in the EU economy.
2020/07/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas there is a disproportionately high risk of contagion for millions of refugees worldwide, who often live in densely populated refugee camps; it is therefore all the more important to remove obstacles that force people to flee their homelands;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 94 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the EU’s global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which demonstrates its ambition to lead and show solidarity with all partner countries; points out, however, that current funds are essentially reallocated from other budget lines and that the challenge of aid front-loading has to be tackled; calls, therefore, for substantial new funds to be mobilised to assist developing countries worldwide in fighting the direct and indirect consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic; stresses that making safe vaccinedrugs and treatments available globally in a fast and affordable manner must be one of the first steps;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 111 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned about the underfunding of the EU humanitarian aid budget, given the additional humanitarian needs caused by the pandemic; calls for a clear distribution of the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve (SEAR) envelope, which should aim to provide balanced coverage of its obligations as follows: neither internal nor external operations may be allocated more than 60 % of the annual amount of the reserve; on 1 October of each year, at least one quarter of the annual amount for ‘year n' must remain available to cover needs arising until the end of that year; as of 1 October, the remaining funds may be mobilised to cover needs arising until the end of that year;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 151 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that global extreme poverty is expected to rise dramatically in 2020 for the first time in over 20 years, withbecause of the COVID-19 pandemic, compounding the forces of conflict and climate change and having a particularly hard impact on informal and migrant workers (who represent one quarter of the global workforce),negative effects especially for the tourism sector and Latin American and Caribbean economies; highlights, against the backdrop of this extreme crisis, the importance of universal social protection; asks the Commission to work out strategies with partner countries for the economic recovery and job creation and for improving social security systems;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 179 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to address the specific needs of refugees, upholding the guiding principle of public health networks of leaving no-one behind and refraining from blocking front-line humanitarian workers from having direct contact with the migrants and refugees they serve, unless this promotes illegal immigration and human trafficking; stresses the absolute need for equal access to COVID-19 treatment and other health services and safety net programmes for all affected people, regardless of nationality, migrant/refugee status, origin, sex, gender identity or any other characteristicwithout exception;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 201 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need to catch up on routine immunisationhealthcare programmes as soon as possible and to provide adequate funding for initiatives such as Gavi, the vaccine Alliance, and CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; calls on the Commission to ensure that the EU global response to the COVID-19 pandemic does not undermine EU funding for other vital health programmes, including the Minimum Initial Services Package for sexual and reproductive health and programmes targeting the health of women and pregnant women; urges all countries and the Commission to continue to provide services related to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) as well as routine immunisation services, while ensuring to guarantee the healthe safety of communities and health workers;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 216 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Supports the important work of the WHO and points out its central role as the leading and coordinating authority on the COVID-19 response, while recognising the need for its reform after the acute crisis has been managed;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 227 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the especially severe consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns and the collateral damage that has been suffered by women, girls and children, in particular the rise in gender-based violence, but also the exposure of women to COVID-19 due to their disproportionately high representation in the global health workforce; calls for action to counterbalance the disproportionate care burden borne by women and any potential roll-backs in safety, health, emancipation, economic independence and empowerment, and education, through specific programmes such as the spotlight initiative and by re- focusing European support; calls for meaningful participation of women in the decisions that impact their health and working lives; underlines the need to include the gender perspective in the EU’s COVID-19 response, to advocate for inclusive decision-making bodies and collect sex- and age-disaggregated data for gender analysisviolence;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 245 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is concerned that, since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, many governments have used the emergency to justify placing restrictions on democratic processes and the civil space and to osuppress minoroppositieson; draws attention to the growing negative impact of COVID-19 on all human rights, democracy and the rule of law and calls, therefore, for the strengthening of aid, political dialogue and support for institution-building in all these fields, with particular attention to human rights defenders;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 276 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented numbers of pupils missing out on months of schooling, constituting a major set-back to efforts in the education sector especially with regard to girls’ and women’s education; urges governments to use school closures only as a measure of last resort in the fight against the pandemic; presses for education to be kept as a spending priority in EU development policy and for due consideration to be given to the social function of schools; urges governments, in this context, to prioritise support for the most marginalised children and their families; recommends that EU countries share their approaches to keeping up teaching even in times of crisis and asks the EU and its Member States to exploit the potential of remote and digital learning in their international support programmes;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 298 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Points out that pandemics are often of zoonotic origin; underlines, therefore, the need to support education programmes regarding the dangers of hunting and trading in wild animals as well as the stricter protection of ecosystems and habitats;deleted
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 311 #

2020/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that, even in times of crisis, food production and distribution must be an absolute priority; considers that dependence on external sources of food, plants, seeds and fertilisers should be reduced, while local and diversified agricultural production should be increased, and knowledge about new, old and more resilient seeds shared; consequently, promotes the concept of food self-sufficiency;
2021/01/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2020/2117(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages the EU and the Member States to help developing countries and regions to keep their borders open and to set up ‘green corridor mechanisms’ to allow the unhindered flow of essential goods, agri- food products and humanitarian aid across border, in a manner consistent with national product safety standards, in particular for food and health products;
2021/03/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 47 #

2020/2117(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the commitment shown by the EU and its Member States in tackling the wider impact of COVID-19, in particular through the Coronavirus Global Response and COVAX initiatives; calls on the Commission to coordinate with the World Health Organization and the African Union in order to scale up vaccine production for developing countries;
2021/03/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that the Industrial Strategy, prepared prior to the outbreak and published at an early stage of the pandemic in Europe, will require substantial revision, to reflect the change in fundamentals and; calls on the new Commission of the Von Der Leyen Commission:to develop realistic strategies to return economies across the EU to growth and therefore to strengthen all economies, both north and south and east and west, to the benefit of citizens and businesses; stresses that the Green Deal is an inappropriate and unaffordable approach for this;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the Commission to undertake, together with Members States, a comprehensive and cross-sectoral analysis of the economies within the EU, in order to understand the depth of impacts felt by the COVID-19 pandemic; considers this an essential evidence base in order for the Commission to issue updated recommendations and determine the key policies that will act to strengthen the collective long-term recovery within the Single Market; welcomes the fourteen coherent industrial ecosystems identified by the Commission, whose strategic independence is to be ensured;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission to focus on domestic productivity on the basis of research and innovation within Europe, in order to establish a strategic autonomy and less dependence on vulnerable supply chains in core industry sectors such as the tech and telecommunications, medical products, pharmaceuticals and agricultural sectors, especially in times of global crisis, to remain competitive on the global markets and to provide European consumers with essential goods;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that EU industrial competitiveness relies on a fully functioning Single Market in Services; underlines that the Commission must consider how to address barriers to cross- border services as part of any revised set of priorities;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the importance of a prudent and not rushed sustainability strategy, which is central to plans to develop European industry; recalls in this regard the European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019, highlighting the need to establish a framework for actions that benefits all Member State and which does not jeopardise the global competitiveness of European industry and SMEs;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises that the public and private sector will encounter significant financial constraints in the coming years, impacting their ability to support a programme of investment, particularly with regard to the Green Deal objectives; expresses concern about an unequal pace of development, particularly in less developed parts of the EU, where achieving transformation demands far more significant adisproportionately high Green Deal objectionves; strongly calls on the Commission in its revised Industrial Strategy to adopt a model with flexibility and support, in order that no one is lefto leave the Green Deal behind;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that the automotive sector is touched by many of the transformations expected in the future economy and has been deeply affected by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; considers that the revised Industrial Strategy should foresee particular actions for this economic core sector, including appropriate financial support., independent of the orientation of production towards electric motor or combustion engine;
2020/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas, the EUTFs, on the one hand, are not always more efficient than traditional development aid and, on the other, are less transparent;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 51 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas Turkey is using the FRT to challenge and to blackmail the EU and its Member States;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 162 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that the EU FRT has proven its value as an innovative pooling tool and important coordinating mechanism for assisting Turkey in swiftly responding to the immediate humanitarian and development needs of refugees and their host communities;deleted
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 169 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Questions the legal basis for authorising the establishment of the Trust Funds in its evaluation and implementation between 2014 and 2018 in the absence of sufficient parliamentary oversight during that period;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 200 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Underlines that Turkey, through a continuous instrumentalisation of the refugee crisis, is taking advantage of the RFT in order to obtain some leverage for political, economic or military concessions, to justify its aggressive behaviour towards the EU Member States and to pursue its foreign policy ambitions;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 205 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. Recalls that in 2018 the European Court of Auditors severely criticised the management of this fund: lack of communication of the list of final beneficiaries, questionable use of funds or lack of efficiency of humanitarian projects, which raises questions about the extension of this fund until 2025;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 11 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas CPR compliance costs represent 0.6 % to 1.1 % of the construction sector’s turnover, borne mainly by manufacturers, which can beis very burdensome for SMEs;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that unlike other NLF legislation, the use of harmonised standards under the CPR is mandatory, which requires an effective system of adoption to address the needs of industry, keep up with technological developments and ensure legal clarity and a level playing field among all European SMEs active in this sector;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that owing to the mandatory nature of standards and the fact that they are considered part of Union legislation, the texts of issued harmonised standards should be available in all Union languages; highlights the need to ensure high-quality translation and involve national standardisation bodies in the translation process; calls on the Commission to further support and simplify the financial arrangements for the translation of harmonised standards; emphasises that a common harmonised technical language would improve the effectiveness of EU regulatory framework while ensuring a level playing field for European economic operators;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Points to the increase in online sales in the construction sector; highlights the need to ensure the effective market surveillance of construction products sold online, especially those purchased from non-EU economic operators monitoring that these products comply with the EU regulatory framework notably to ensure a high level of EU consumer protection;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Highlights the need to ensure the proper involvement of all stakeholders in the consultation and evaluation process; highlights the need for a level playing field in construction products legislation for all businesses, especially SMEs, to avoid any form of trade barrier in the internal market by monitoring national regulations on construction products set by Member States;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas associations and NPOs are fundamental toinvolved in representing the interests of citizens and civil society;
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 16 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas NPOs are an integral part of the EU's civil society and include philanthropic organisations such as foundations that contribute to and facilitate the work of individuals, associations and NPOs for the public interest;deleted
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas associations and NPOs play a key role incontribute to supporting individuals to actively participate in the democratic life;
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas any organisation benefiting from a European statute or from European common minimum standards should not act against the EU's common values enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights;deleted
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 39 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that Union legislation supporting associations and NPOs is also needed for the completion of the single market;deleted
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to recognise and promote the public benefit activities of associations and NPOs by harmonising the public benefit status across the EU, also with regard to tax benefits for them and their benefactors, where such benefits exist under national legislation;deleted
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 103 #

2020/2026(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Requests the Commission to submit on the basis of Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a Regulation establishing a statute for a European Association, following the recommendations set out in this motion, and Annex II hereto;deleted
2021/10/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #

2020/2019(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that the websites of platforms should provide a means for consumers to easily lodge complaints concerning false or misleading third-party advertising on these platforms;
2020/05/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2020/2019(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Is of the opinion that the list of legal representatives established in the EU that can be held responsible for the content of advertisements must be easily accessible on the platforms’ websites;
2020/05/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses the importance to avoid a purely notional and sterile use of AI in education which would undermine educational bonds between pupils, students and other learners and teachers, as well as between children and parents; the human dimension of education must remain at the forefront;
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners, also considering threats and vulnerabilities coming from cyberspace; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities and monitored by them, so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent and easily recognisable, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. recalls how Artificial intelligence could be a perfect tool to allow a wide audience of users to remotely enjoy public cultural heritage (e.g. exhibitions or museums) for information purposes, "tourism", but also research; therefore encourages cultural institutions to exploit the potential of AI to make their contents widely accessible;
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Suggests that audiovisual content for educational purposes should be catalogued and classified according to age groups in order to facilitate an effective selection of the most suitable contents;
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2020/2017(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. supports the use of AI related to the dissemination of texts and manuscripts, especially ancient ones, through the web, to preserve them from destruction but at the same time to make them accessible to a wide mass of users, including researchers, experts and scholars.
2020/04/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 38 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the personal data of European citizens should preferably be processed in Europe.
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that where public money contributes to the development or implementation of an algorithmic system, the code, the generated data -as far as it is non-personal- and the trained model should be public by default, to enable transparency and reuse, among other goals, to maximise the achievement of the Single Market, and to avoid market fragmentation;deleted
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for the Union to establish a European market surveillance structure for algorithmic systems issuing guidance, opinions and expertise to Member States’ authorities;deleted
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and the authorities of the Member States to combat tax evasion and the abuse of a dominant position by non-European companies in Europe active in the market for algorithmic systems;
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses the need for the authorities to put an end to the practices of massive and systematic profiling or tracking of consumers organised by some players in the advertising industry on the internet or mobile phones; notes that these tools collect very sensitive data about behaviour, interests or health, even from minors and that they are then used by third parties; regrets that the lack of supervision by the authorities strengthens the market power of less ethical players and dissuades some players from offering more ethical solutions that are more favourable to consumers.
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for the establishment of a European market surveillance board for algorithmic systems, to ensure a level playing field and to avoid fragmentation of the internal market, to decide with a qualified majority and by secret vote in case of different decisions on algorithmic systems used in more than one Member State, as well as at the request of the majority of the national authorities;deleted
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls for measures to encourage global companies to relocate part of their employment, research and digital systems and products to Europe, if they want to benefit from full access to the European market;
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Calls for respect for European and national preferences, for the development of European territories and employment in the sector of artificial intelligence and robotics; stresses the importance of preventing the takeover of strategic companies by non-European players;
2020/05/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that insufficientcomplete national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; regrets that the assessment of proportionality is rarely carried out; calls on the Commission to define the concept of proportionality more precisely and to provide Member States with practical guidelines for its application;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; recalls that the country of destination principle was not included in the Services Directive;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. EncouragesCalls on the Commission to fully enforce existing rulnot to exceed its competences disproportionately and, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, to give the Member States room for development in their policies and legislation on the free movement of workers and services; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate non-regulatory burdens introduced;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) A small number of large – non- European and notably American – providers of core platform services have emerged with considerable economic power. Typically, they feature an ability to connect many business users with many end users through their services which, in turn, allows them to leverage their advantages and abuse their position, such as their access to large amounts of data, from one area of their activity to new ones. Some of these providers exercise control over whole platform ecosystems in the digital economy and are structurally extremely difficult to challenge or contest by existing or new market operators, irrespective of how innovative and efficient these may be. Contestability is particularly reduced due to the existence of very high barriers to entry or exit, including high investment costs, which cannot, or not easily, be recuperated in case of exit, and absence of (or reduced access to) some key inputs in the digital economy, such as data. As a result, the likelihood increases that the underlying markets do not function well – or will soon fail to function well – to the detriment of European businesses and consumers.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Therefore, bBusiness users and end- users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers should be afforded appropriate regulatory safeguards throughout the Union and the Member States against the unfair behaviour of gatekeepers in order to facilitate cross- border business within the Union and thereby improve the proper functioning of the internal market and to address existing or likely emerging fragmentation in the specific areas covered by this Regulation. Moreover, while gatekeepers tend to adopt global or at least pan-European business models and algorithmic structures, they can adopt, and in some cases have adopted, different and unfair business conditions and practices in different Member States, which is liable to create disparities between thewhich create unequal competitive conditions for the users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers, to the detriment of integration with and prevent commercial alternatives, including future innovative players and European digital businesses and SMEs, from entering and operating in the interndigital market.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) A particular subset of rules should apply to those providers of core platform services that are foreseen to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future. The same specific features of core platform services make them prone to tipping: once a service provider has obtained a certain advantage over rivals or potential challengers in terms of scale or intermediation power, its position may become unassailable and the situation may evolve to the point that it is likely to become durable and entrenched in the near future. Undertakings can try to induce this tipping and emerge as gatekeeper by using some of the unfair conditions and practices regulated in this Regulation. In such a situation, it appears appropriate to intervene before the market tips irreversibly.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) However, such an early intervention should be limited to imposing only those obligations that are necessary and appropriate to ensure that the services in question remain contestable and allow to avoid the qualified risk of unfair conditions and practices. Obligations that prevent the provider of core platform services concerned from achieving an entrenched and durable position in its operations, such as those preventing unfair leveraging, and those that facilitate switching and multi-homing are more directly geared towards this purpose. To ensure proportionality, the Commission should moreover apply from that subset of obligations only those that are necessary and proportionate to achieve the objectives of this Regulation and should regularly review whether such obligations should be maintained, suppressed or adapted.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) This should allow the Commission to intervene in time and effectively, while fully respecting the proportionality of the considered measures. It should also reassure actual or potential market participants about the fairness and contestability of the services concerned.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The obligations laid down in this Regulation are limited to what is necessary and justified to address the unfairness of the identified practices by gatekeepers and to ensure contestability in relation to core platform services provided by gatekeepers. Therefore, the obligations should correspond to those practices that are considered unfair by taking into account the features of the digital sector and where experience gained, for example in the enforcement of the EU and national competition rules, shows that they have a particularly negative direct impact on the business users and end users as well as businesses operating in the digital market including innovative players and European digital businesses and SMEs. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of a regulatory dialogue with gatekeepers to tailor those obligations that are likely to require specific implementing measures in order to ensure their effectiveness and proportionality. The obligations should only be updated after a thorough investigation on the nature and impact of specific practices that may be newly identified, following an in-depth investigation, as unfair or limiting contestability in the same manner as the unfair practices laid down in this Regulation while potentially escaping the scope of the current set of obligations.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 317 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) To ensure the effectiveness of the obligations laid down by this Regulation, while also making certain that these obligations are limited to what is necessary to ensure contestability and tackling the harmful effects of the unfair behaviour by gatekeepers, it is important to clearly define and circumscribe them so as to allow the gatekeeper to immediately comply with them, in full respect of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, consumer protection, cyber security and product safety. The gatekeepers should ensure the compliance with this Regulation by design. The necessary measures should therefore be as much as possible and where relevant integrated into the technological design used by the gatekeepers. However, it may in certain cases be appropriate for the Commission, following a dialogue with the gatekeeper concerned, to further specify some of the measures that the gatekeeper concerned should adopt in order to effectively comply with those obligations that are susceptible of being further specified. This possibility of a regulatory dialogue should facilitate compliance by gatekeepers and expedite the correct implementation of the Regulation. This procedure may be initiated at the request of a competent national authority. The competent national authorities shall be consulted during the procedure.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
(60) In exceptional circumstances justified on the limited grounds of public morality, public health or public security, the Commission should be able to decide that the obligation concerned does not apply to a specific core platform service. Affecting these public interests can indicate that the cost to society as a whole of enforcing a certain obligation would in a certain exceptional case be too high and thus disproportionate. The regulatory dialogue to facilitate compliance with limited suspension and exemption possibilities should ensure the proportionality of the obligations in this Regulation without undermining the intended ex ante effects on fairness and contestability.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
(63) Following a market investigation, an undertaking providing a core platform service could be found to fulfil all of the overarching qualitative criteria for being identified as a gatekeeper. It should then, in principle, comply with all of the relevant obligations laid down by this Regulation. However, for gatekeepers that have been designated by the Commission as likely to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future, the Commission should only impose those obligations that are necessary and appropriate to prevent that the gatekeeper concerned achieves an entrenched and durable position in its operations. With respect to such emerging gatekeepers, the Commission should take into account that this status is in principle of a temporary nature, and it should therefore be decided at a given moment whether such a provider of core platform services should be subjected to the full set of gatekeeper obligations because it has acquired an entrenched and durable position, or conditions for designation are ultimately not met and therefore all previously imposed obligations should be waived.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 353 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) In order to ensure effective implementation and compliance with this Regulation, the Commission should haveand the Member States should pool their strong investigative and enforcement powers, to allow it to investigate, enforce and monitor the rules laid down in this Regulation, while at the same time ensuring the respect for the fundamental right to be heard and to have access to the file in the context of the enforcement proceedings. The Commission should dispose of these investigative powers also for the purpose of carrying out market investigations for the purpose of updating and reviewing this Regulation.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 357 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) The Commission should also be empowered to undertake onsite inspections and to interview any persons who may be in possession of useful information and to record the statements made.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 376 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 79 – introductory part
(79) The objective of this Regulation is to ensure a contestable and fair digital sector in general and core platform services in particular, with a view to promoting innovation, high quality of digital products and services, fair and competitive prices, as well as a high quality and choice for end users in the digital sector. This cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can only, by reason of the business model and operae Regulation should also create the conditions ofor the gatekeepers and the scale and effects of their operations, be fully achieved at Union leveldevelopment of the digital sector in Europe. The Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 383 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation layse purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market and consumer protection by laying down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union for European undertakings, including SMEs, where gatekeepers are present.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 407 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6
6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It is also without prejudice to the application of: national rules prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings, concerted practices and abuses of dominant positions; national competition rules prohibiting other forms of unilateral conduct insofar as they are applied to undertakings other than gatekeepers or amount to imposing additional obligations on gatekeepers; Council Regulation (EC) No 139/200438 and national rules concerning merger control; Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 and Regulation (EU) …./.. of the European Parliament and of the Council39 ; Directive (EU) 2019/882. _________________ 38Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1). 39Regulation (EU) …/.. of the European Parliament and of the Council – proposal on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14
(14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the provision of payment services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, fulfilment, parcel delivery services as defined in Article 2 (2) of Regulation (EU) No 2018/644, freight, identification or advertising services;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
(23 a) "persons with disabilities" means persons within the meaning of Article 3 (1) of Directive (EU) 2019/882;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 498 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) it enjoys an entrenched and durable position in its operations or it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the near future.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 516 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1
for the purpose of the first subparagraph, monthly active end users shall refer to the average number of monthly active end users throughout the largest part of the last financial year;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 562 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
In conducting its assessment, the Commission shall take into account foreseeable developments of these elements.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 565 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
Where the provider of a core platform service that does not satisfy the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply within a reasonable time-limit and to submit observations, the Commission shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper based on facts available.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 595 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In respect of each of its core platform services and ancillary services identified pursuant to Article 3(7) and Article 2 (1) (14) respectively, a gatekeeper shall:
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 607 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) Any multinational gatekeeper wishing to continue operating in the internal market must establish itself in the European Union and develop local jobs.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 608 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(a b) The creation of local jobs shall be used by the competent national authorities and the Commission in the procedures to determine whether the gatekeepers have fulfilled their obligations.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 643 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an identification service of the gatekeeperr any other ancillary services of the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking, in the context of services offered by the business users using the core platform services of that gatekeeper;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 676 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) provide advertisers and publishers to which it supplies advertising services, upon their request, withregularly publishes information concerning the price paid by the advertiser and publisher, as well as the amount or remuneration paid to the publisher, for the publishing of a given ad and for each of the relevant advertising services provided by the gatekeeper.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 706 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Gatekeepers shall report annually to the Commission the number of employees based in each Member State and the percentage of total global employees for each core platform service identified by this Regulation.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 713 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) refrain from using, in competition with business userdirectly or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking, in competition with business users and providers of ancillary services, any data not publicly available, which is generated through activities by those business users, including by the end users of these business users, of its core platform services or provided by those business users of its core platform services or by the end users of these business users;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 732 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) allow the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper. The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper, without prejudice to the freedom of consumers, duly informed, to choose the software application or software application stores they prefer;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 750 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking services, both basic and ancillary, and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non- discriminatory conditions to such ranking;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 826 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(k a) ensure their services, including user interfaces, are accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2019/882;
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 901 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper, provisionally suspend the application of the relevant obligation to one or more individual core platform services already prior to the decision pursuant to paragraph 1. In assessing the request, the Commission shall take into account, in particular, the impact of the compliance with the specific obligation on the economic viability of the operation of the gatekeeper in the Union as well as on third parties. The suspension may be made subject to conditions and obligations to be defined by the Commission in order to ensure a fair balance between these interests and the objectives of this Regulation. Such a request may be made and granted at any time pending the assessment of the Commission pursuant to paragraph 1.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 907 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) public morality;deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 908 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) public morality;deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 928 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the contestability of markets is weakened as a consequence of such a practice engaged in by gatekeepers, in particular where businesses operating in the digital market, including innovative players and European digital businesses or SMEs, are hindered.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 935 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. A gatekeeper shall ensure that the obligations of Articles 5 and 6 are fully and effectively complied with. While the obligations of Articles 5 and 6 apply in respect of core and ancillary platform services designated pursuant to Article 3, and to Article 2 (1) (14) their implementation shall not be undermined by any behaviour of the undertaking to which the gatekeeper belogatekeeper or any third party belonging to the same undertakings, regardless of whether this behaviour is of a contractual, commercial, technical or any other nature.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 957 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission and the competent national authorities of any intended concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 involving another provider of core platform services or of any other services provided in the digital sector irrespective of whether it is notifiable to a Union competition authority under Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 or to a competent national competition authority under national merger rules.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 979 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission may conduct a market investigation, on which it shall cooperate with the competent national authorities, for the purpose of examining whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(6), or in order to identify core platform services for a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(7). It shall endeavour to conclude its investigation by adopting a decision in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) within twelvesix months from the opening of the market investigation.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 995 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. When the Commission pursuant to Article 3(6) designates as a gatekeeper a provider of core platform services that does not yet enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations, but it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the near future, it shall declare applicable to that gatekeeper only obligations laid down in Article 5(b) and Article 6(1) points (e), (f), (h) and (i) as specified in the designation decision. The Commission shall only declare applicable those obligations that are appropriate and necessary to prevent that the gatekeeper concerned achieves by unfair means an entrenched and durable position in its operations. The Commission shall review such a designation in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 4.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1019 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. A gatekeeper shall be deemed to have engaged in a systematic non- compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6, where the Commission has issued at least three non-compliance or fining decisions pursuant to Articles 25 and 26 respectively against a gatekeeper in relation to any of its core platform services within a period of five years prior to the adoption of the decision opening a market investigation in view of the possible adoption of a decision pursuant to this Article.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1055 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. At the request of the Commission, the governments and authorities of the Member States shall provide the Commission with all necessary information to carry out the duties assigned to it by this Regulation. Competent national authorities or any stakeholder may also on their own initiative provide the Commission or the European High-Level Group of Digital Regulators with information to be taken into account in their deliberations.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1059 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21
Powers to conduct on-site inspections 1. The Commission may conduct on-site inspections at the premises of an undertaking or association of undertakings. 2. On-site inspections may also be carried out with the assistance of auditors or experts appointed by the Commission pursuant to Article 24(2). 3. During on-site inspections the Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may require the undertaking or association of undertakings to provide access to and explanations on its organisation, functioning, IT system, algorithms, data- handling and business conducts. The Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may address questions to key personnel. 4. Undertakings or associations of undertakings are required to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by decision of the Commission. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the visit, set the date on which it is to begin and indicate the penalties provided for in Articles 26 and 27 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice.Article 21 deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1103 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) fail to rectify within a time-limit set by the Commission, incorrect, incomplete or misleading information given by a member of staff, or fail or refuse to provide complete information on facts relating to the subject-matter and purpose of an inspection pursuant to Article 21;deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1104 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) refuse to submit to an on-site inspection pursuant to Article 21.deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1110 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to submit to an on-site inspection which was ordered by a decision taken pursuant to Article 21;deleted
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1190 #

2020/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. The evaluations shall establish whether additional rules, including regarding the list of core platform services laid down in point 2 of Article 2, the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 and their enforcement, may be required to ensure that digital markets across the Union are contestable and fair and to what extent this Regulation is helping to develop the European digital market. Following the evaluations, the Commission shall take appropriate measures, which may include legislative proposals.
2021/07/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Council Directive 2008/114/EC17 provides for a procedure for designating European critical infrastructures in the energy and transport sectors, the disruption or destruction of which would have significant cross-border impact on at least two Member States. That Directive focused exclusively on the protection of such infrastructures. However, the evaluation of Directive 2008/114/EC conducted in 201918 found that due to the increasingly interconnected and cross-border nature of operations using critical infrastructure, protective measures relating to individual assets alone are insufficient to prevent all disruptions from taking place. Therefore, it is necessary to shift the approach towards ensuring the resilience of critical entities, that is, their ability to mitigate, absorb, react to, accommodate to and recover from incidents that have the potential to disrupt the operations of the critical entity. __________________ 17Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection (OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p.75). 18 SWD(2019) 308.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Despite existing measures at Union19 and national level aimed at supporting the protection of critical infrastructures in the Union, the entities operating those infrastructures are not adequately equipped to address current and anticipated future risks to their operations that may result in disruptions of the provision of services that are essential for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities. This is due to a dynamic threat landscape with an evolving state-sponsored hybrid actions and terrorist threats and growing interdependencies between infrastructures and sectors, as well as an increased physical risk due toman-made hazards and cyber attacks, natural disasters and climate change, which increases the frequency and scale of extreme weather events and brings long-term changes in average climate that can reduce the capacity and efficiency of certain infrastructure types if resilience or climate adaptation measures are not in place. Moreover, relevant sectors and types of entities are not recognised consistently as critical in all Member States. __________________ 19European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP).
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Those growing interdependencies are the result of an increasingly cross- border and interdependent network of service provision using key infrastructures across the Union in the sectors of energy, transport, banking, financial market infrastructure, digital infrastructure, drinking and waste water, health, certain aspects of public administration, as well as space in as far as the provision of certain services depending on ground-based infrastructures that are owned, managed and operated either by Member States or by private parties is concerned, therefore not covering infrastructures owned, managed or operated by or on behalf of the Union as part of its space programmes. These interdependencies mean that any disruption, even one initially confined to one entity or one sector, can have cascading effects more broadly, potentially resulting in far-reaching and long-lasting negative impacts in the delivery of services across the internal market and on consumers in the Union. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the vulnerability of our increasingly interdependent societies in the face of low-probability risks.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The entities involved in the provision of essential services are increasingly subject to diverging requirements imposed under the laws of the Member States. The fact that some Member States have less stringent security requirements on these entities not only risks impacting negatively on the maintenance of vital societal functions or economic activities across the Union, it also leads to obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market and it negatively affects consumers. Similar types of entities are considered as critical in some Member States but not in others, and those which are identified as critical are subject to divergent requirements in different Member States. This results in additional and unnecessary administrative burdens for companies operating across borders, notably for companies active in Member States with more stringent requirements.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The actions of Member States to identify and help ensure the resilience of critical entities should follow a risk-based approach that targets efforts to the entities most relevant for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities. In order to ensure such a targeted approach, each Member State should carry out, within a harmonised framework, an assessment of all relevant natural and man- made risks that may affect the provision of essential services, including accidents, hybrid threats, natural disasters, public health emergencies such as pandemics, and antagonistic threats, including terrorist offences. When carrying out those risk assessments, Member States should take into account other general or sector- specific risk assessment carried out pursuant to other acts of Union law and should consider the dependencies between sectors, including from other Member States and third countries. The outcomes of the risk assessment should be used in the process of identification of critical entities and to assist those entities in meeting the resilience requirements of this Directive.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In coordination with their national relevant authorities, Member States, should designate authorities competent to supervise the application of and, where necessary, enforce the rules of this Directive and ensure that those authorities are adequately empowered and resourced. In view of the differences in national governance structures and in order to safeguard already existing sectoral arrangements or Union supervisory and regulatory bodies, and to avoid duplication, Member States should be able to designate more than one competent authority. In that case, they should however clearly delineate the respective tasks of the authorities concerned and ensure that they cooperate smoothly and effectively. All competent authorities should also cooperate more generally with other relevant authorities, both at national and Union level.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to be able to ensure their resilience, critical entities should have a comprehensive understanding of all relevant risks to which they are exposed and analyse those risks. To that aim, they should carry out risks assessments, whenever necessary in view of their particular circumstances and the evolution of those risks, yet in any event every four years. The risk assessments by critical entities should be based on the risk assessment carried out by Member States, ensuring close cooperation between relevant authorities.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The risk of employees of critical entities misusing for instance their access rights within the entity’s organisation to harm and cause damage is of increasing concern. That risk is exacerbated by the growing intensity of hybrid threats, which are increasingly difficult to track and identify, but also by the phenomenon of radicalisation leading to violent extremism and terrorism. It is therefore necessary to enable critical entities to request background checks on persons falling within specific categories of its personnel and to ensure that those requests are assessed expeditiously by the relevant authorities, in accordance with the applicable rules of Union and national law, including on the protection of personal data. Specific trainings for employees and operators should be established.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Critical entities should notify, as soon as reasonably possible under the given circumstances, Member States’ competent authorities of incidents that significantly disrupt or have the potential to significantly disrupt their operations. The notification should allow the competent authorities to respond to the incidents rapidly and adequately to avoid further and more negative consequences and to have a comprehensive overview of the overall risks that critical entities face. For that purpose, a procedure should be established for the notification of certain incidents and parameters should be provided for to determine when the actual or potential disruption is significant and the incidents should thus be notified. Given the potential cross-border impacts of such disruptions, a procedure should be established for Member States to inform other affected Member States via single points of contacts. Given the sensitivity of certain events, appropriate forms of confidentiality should be ensured, together with mechanisms to prevent the dissemination of uncontrolled information.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) lays down obligations for Member States to take certain measures aimed at ensuring the provision in the internal market of services essential for the maintenance of vital societal functions or economic activities, in particular to identify critical entities and entities to be treated as equivalent in certain respects, and to enable them to meet their obligations, especially if they are particularly vulnerable;
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) establishes obligations for critical entities aimed at enhancing their resilience and improving their ability to provide those services in the internal market, and, in the event of an interruption, to promptly limit the damage or mitigate possible consequences in consultation with the designated national authorities;
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The risk assessment shall account for all relevant natural and man-made risks, including accidents, hybrid threats, natural disasters, public health emergencies, antagonistic threats, including terrorist offences pursuant to Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . __________________ 34Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the impacts that incidents could have, in terms of degree and duration, on economic and societal activities, the environment and, public safety and the citizens;
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall support critical entities in enhancing their resilience and also in developing specific protocols, agreements, cooperation and exchange of information and expertise between the public and the private sector. That support may include developing guidance materials and methodologies, supporting the organisation of exercises to test their resilience and providing training to personnel of critical entities.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
The risk assessment shall account for all relevant risks referred to in Article 4(1) which could lead to the disruption of the provision of essential services, including an assessment of the international situation. It shall take into account any dependency of other sectors referred to in the Annex on the essential service provided by the critical entity, including in neighbouring Member States and third countries where relevant, and the impact that a disruption of the provision of essential services in one or more of those sectors may have on the essential service provided by the critical entity.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) prevent incidents from occurring, including through disaster risk reduction, protection from hybrid threats and climate adaptation measures;
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ensure adequate employee security management and training, including by setting out categories of personnel exercising critical functions, establishing access rights to sensitive areas, facilities and other infrastructure, and to sensitive information as well as identifying specific categories of personnel in view of Article 12;
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2020/0365(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) raise awareness and train employees and operators about the measures referred to in points (a) to (e) among relevant personnel.
2021/06/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to achieve the objective of ensuring a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, for the purpose of this Regulation the concept of “illegal content” should be defined broadly and also covers information relating to illegal content, products, services and activities. In particular, that concept should be understood to refer to information, irrespective of its form, that under the applicable law is either itself illegal, such as illegal hate speech or terrorist content and unlawful discriminatory content, or that relates to activities that are illegal, such as the sharing of images depicting child sexual abuse, unlawful non- consensual sharing of private images, online stalking, the sale of non-compliant or counterfeit products, the non-authorised use of copyright protected material or activities involving infringements of consumer protection law. In this regard, it is immaterial whether the illegality of the information or activity results from Union law or from national law that is consistent with Union lawthe criminal, administrative or civil legal framework of a Member State and what the precise nature or subject matter is of the law in question.
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 159 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to create legal certainty and not to discourage activities aimed at detecting, identifying and acting against illegal content that providers of intermediary services may undertake on a voluntary basis, it should be clarified that the mere fact that providers undertake such activities does not lead to the unavailability of the exemptions from liability set out in this Regulation, provided those activities are carried out in good faith and in a diligent manner. In addition, it is appropriate to clarify that the mere fact that those providers take measures, in good faith, to comply with the requirements of national and Union law, including those set out in this Regulation as regards the implementation of their terms and conditions, should not lead to the unavailability of those exemptions from liability. Therefore, any such activities and measures that a given provider may have taken should not be taken into account when determining whether the provider can rely on an exemption from liability, in particular as regards whether the provider provides its service neutrally and can therefore fall within the scope of the relevant provision, without this rule however implying that the provider can necessarily rely thereon.
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 169 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Providers of intermediary services that do not qualify as very large online platform should not be subject to a monitoring obligation with respect to obligations of a general nature. This does not concern monitoring obligations in a specific case and, in particular, does not affect orders by national authorities in accordance with national legislation, in accordance and with the conditions established in this Regulation. Nothing in this Regulation should be construed as an imposition of a general monitoring obligation or active fact-finding obligation, or as a general obligation for providers to take proactive measures to relation to illegal content.
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 189 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Responsible and diligent behaviour by providers of intermediary services is essential for a safe, accessible, predictable and trusted online environment and for allowing Union citizens and other persons to exercise their fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Charter’), in particular the freedom of expression and information and the freedom to conduct a business, and the right to non- discrimination.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In order to facilitate smooth and efficient communications relating to matters covered by this Regulation, providers of intermediary services should be required to establish a single point of contact and to publish relevant information relating to their point of contact, including the languages to be used in such communications. The point of contact can also be used by trusted flaggers and by professional entities which are under a specific relationship with the provider of intermediary services. In contrast to the legal representative, the point of contact should serve operational purposes and should not necessarily have to have a physical location .
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 191 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Therefore, in order to safeguard and improve the functioning of the internal market, a targeted set of uniform, effective and proportionate mandatory rules should be established at Union level. This Regulation provides the conditions for innovative digital services to emerge and to scale up in the internal market. The approximation of national regulatory measures at Union level concerning the requirements for providers of intermediary services is necessary in order to avoid and put an end to fragmentation of the internal market and to ensure legal certainty, thus reducing uncertainty for developers and fostering interoperability. By using requirements that are technology neutral, innovation should not be hampered but instead be stimulated.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation should apply to providers of certain information society services as defined in Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , that is, any service normalfrequently provided for remuneration, at a distance, by electronic means and at the individual request of a recipient. Specifically, this Regulation should apply to providers of intermediary services, and in particular intermediary services consisting of services known as ‘mere conduit’, ‘caching’ and ‘hosting’ services, given that the exponential growth of the use made of those services, mainly for legitimate and socially beneficial purposes of all kinds, has also increased their role in the intermediation and spread of unlawful or otherwise harmful information and activitiesillegal content. __________________ 26Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 210 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Such a substantial connection to the Union should be considered to exist where the service provider has an establishment in the Union or, in its absence, on the basis of the existence of a significant number of users in one or more Member States, or the targeting of activities towards one or more Member States. The targeting of activities towards one or more Member States can be determined on the basis of all relevant circumstances, including factors such as the use of a language or a currency generally used in that Member State, or the possibility of ordering products or services, or using a national top level domain. The targeting of activities towards a Member State could also be derived from the availability of an application in the relevant national application store, from the provision of local advertising or advertising in the language used in that Member State, or from the handling of customer relations such as by providing customer service in the language generally used in that Member State. A substantial connection should also be assumed where a service provider directs its activities to one or more Member State as set out in Article 17(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . On the other hand, mere technical accessibility of a website from the Union cannot, on that ground alone, be considered as establishing a substantial connection to the Union. __________________ 27 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L351, 20.12.2012, p.1).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) To avoid disproportionate burdens, the additional obligations imposed on online platforms under this Regulation should not apply to micro or small enterprises as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC of the Commission,41 unless their reach and impact is such that they meet the criteria to qualify as very large online platforms under this Regulation or are held or controlled by entities established outside the European Union. The consolidation rules laid down in that Recommendation help ensure that any circumvention of those additional obligations is prevented. The exemption of micro- and small enterprises from those additional obligations should not be understood as affecting their ability to set up, on a voluntary basis, a system that complies with one or more of those obligations. _________________ 41 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium- sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 222 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Action against illegal content can be taken more quickly and reliably where online platforms take the necessary measures to ensure that notices submitted by trusted flaggers through the notice and action mechanisms required by this Regulation are treated with priority, without prejudice to the requirement to process and decide upon all notices submitted under those mechanisms in a timely, diligent and objective manner. Such trusted flagger status should only be awarded to entities, and not individuals, that have demonstrated, among other things, that they have particular expertise and competence in tackling illegal content, that they represent collective interests and that they work in a diligent and objective manner. Such entities can be public in nature, such as, for terrorist content, internet referral units of national law enforcement authorities or of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’) or they can be non-governmental organisations and semi-public bodies, such as the organisations part of the INHOPE network of hotlines for reporting child sexual abuse material and organisations committed to notifying illegal racist and xenophobic expressions online. For intellectual property rights, organisations of industry and of right- holders could be awarded trusted flagger status, where they have demonstrated that they meet the applicable conditions. The rules of this Regulation on trusted flaggers should not be understood to prevent online platforms from giving similar treatment to notices submitted by entities or individuals that have not been awarded trusted flagger status under this Regulation, from otherwise cooperating with other entities, in accordance with the applicable law, including this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council.43 _________________ 43Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA, OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53deleted
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 263 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) Very large online platforms should deploy the necessary means to diligently mitigate the systemic risks identified in the risk assessment. Very large online platforms should under such mitigating measures consider, for example, enhancing or otherwise adapting the design and functioning of their content moderation, algorithmic recommender systems and online interfaces, so that they discourage and limit the dissemination of illegal content, adapting their decision-making processes, or adapting their terms and conditions. They may also include corrective measures, such as discontinuing advertising revenue for specific content, or other actions, such as improving the visibility of authoritative information sources. Very large online platforms may reinforce their internal processes or supervision of any of their activities, in particular as regards the detection of systemic risks. They may also initiate or increase cooperation with trusted flaggers, organise training sessions and exchanges with trusted flagger organisations, and cooperate with other service providers, including by initiating or joining existing codes of conduct or other self-regulatory measures. Any measures adopted should respect the due diligence requirements of this Regulation and be effective and appropriate for mitigating the specific risks identified, in the interest of safeguarding public order, protecting privacy and fighting fraudulent and deceptive commercial practices, and should be proportionate in light of the very large online platform’s economic capacity and the need to avoid unnecessary restrictions on the use of their service, taking due account of potential negative effects on the fundamental rights of the recipients of the service.
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 269 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 59
(59) Very large online platforms should, where appropriate, conduct their risk assessments and design their risk mitigation measures with the involvement of representatives of the recipients of the service, representatives of groups potentially impacted by their services, independent experts and civil society organisationrelevant public actors.
2021/07/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 272 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) The audit report should be substantiated, so as to give a meaningful account of the activities undertaken and the conclusions reached. It should help inform, and where appropriate suggest improvements to the measures taken by the very large online platform to comply with their obligations under this Regulation. The report should be transmitted to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishments and the Board without delay, together with the risk assessment and the mitigation measures, as well as the platform’s plans for addressing the audit’s recommendations. The report should include an audit opinion based on the conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained. A positive opinion should be given where all evidence shows that the very large online platform complies with the obligations laid down by this Regulation or, where applicable, any commitments it has undertaken pursuant to a code of conduct or crisis protocol, in particular by identifying, evaluating and mitigating the systemic risks posed by its system and services. A positive opinion should be accompanied by comments where the auditor wishes to include remarks that do not have a substantial effect on the outcome of the audit. A negative opinion should be given where the auditor considers that the very large online platform does not comply with this Regulation or the commitments undertaken.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 280 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to benefit from the exemption from liability for hosting services, the provider should, upon obtaining actual knowledge or awareness of illegal content, act expeditiously to remove or to disable access to that content act to remove or to disable access to the illegal content when such content is deemed to be illegal according to Union or Member State law. The removal or disabling of access should be undertaken in the observance of the principle of freedom of expression. The provider can obtain such actual knowledge or awareness throughf the illegal content, in particular, its own- initiative investigations or notices submitted to it by individuals or entities in accordance with this Regulation in so far as those notices are sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated to allow a diligentn economic operator to reasonably identify, assess and where appropriate act against the allegedly illegal content.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 286 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure the effective protection of consumers when engaging in intermediated commercial transactions online, certain providers of hosting services, namely, online platforms that allow consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, should not be able to benefit from the exemption from liability for hosting service providers established in this Regulation, in so far as those online platforms present the relevant information relating to the transactions at issue in such a way that it leads consumers to believe that the information was provided by those online platforms themselves or by recipients of the service acting under their authority or control, and that those online platforms thus have knowledge of or control over the information, even if that may in reality not be the case. In that regard, is should be determined objectively, on the basis of all relevant circumstances, whether the presentation could lead to such a belief on the side of an average and reasonably well-informed consumer.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64
(64) In order to appropriately supervise the compliance of very large online platforms with the obligations laid down by this Regulation, thea Digital Services Coordinator of establishment or the Commission may require access to or reporting of specific data. Such a requirement may include, for example, the data necessary to assess the risks and possible harms brought about by the platform’s systems, data on the accuracy, functioning and testing of algorithmic systems for content moderation, recommender systems or advertising systems, or data on processes and outputs of content moderation or of internal complaint-handling systems within the meaning of this Regulation. Investigations by researchers on the evolution and severity of online systemic risks are particularly important for bridging information asymmetries and establishing a resilient system of risk mitigation, informing online platforms, Digital Services Coordinators, other competent authorities, the Commission and the public. This Regulation therefore provides a framework for compelling access to data from very large online platforms to vetted researchers. All requirements for access to data under that framework should be proportionate and appropriately protect the rights and legitimate interests, including trade secrets and other confidential information, of the platform and any other parties concerned, including the recipients of the service.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 290 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) European consumers should be able to safely purchase products and services online, regardless of whether a product or service has been produced in the Union or not. Online platforms allowing distance contracts with third- country traders should establish, before approving that trader on their platform, that the third-country trader complies with the relevant Union or national law on product safety and product compliance. In addition, if the third- country trader does not provide an economic operator inside the Union liable for the product safety, online platforms should not be able to benefit from the exemption from liability for hosting service providers established in this Regulation.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
(67) The Commission and the Board should encourage the drawing-up of codes of conduct to contribute to the application of this Regulation. While the implementation of codes of conduct shouldall be measurable and subject to public oversight, this should not impair the voluntary nature of such codes and the freedom of interested parties to decide whether to participate. In certain circumstances, it is important that very large online platforms cooperate in the drawing-up and adhere to specific codes of conduct. Nothing in this Regulation prevents other service providers from adhering to the same standards of due diligence, adopting best practices and benefitting from the guidance provided by the Commission and the Board, by participating in the same codes of conduct.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 307 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) In case of extraordinary circumstances affecting public security or public health, the Commission in cooperation with the Board may initiate the drawing up of crisis protocols to coordinate a rapid, collective and cross- border response in the online environment. Extraordinary circumstances may entail any unforeseeable event, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, pandemics and other serious cross-border threats to public health, war and acts of terrorism, where, for example, online platforms may be misused for the rapid spread of illegal content or disinformation or where the need arises for rapid dissemination of reliable information. In light of the important role of very large online platforms in disseminating information in our societies and across borders, such platforms should be encouraged in drawing up and applying specific crisis protocols. Such crisis protocols should be activated only for a limited period of time and the measures adopted should also be limited to what is strictly necessary to address the extraordinary circumstance. Those measures should be consistent with this Regulation, and should not amount to a general obligation for the participating very large online platforms to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal content.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 315 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76 a (new)
(76 a) With regard to very large online platforms that offer services in the Union and therefore fall within the scope of this Regulation, Member States where individuals or representative organisations received their services shall have jurisdiction, without prejudice to the relevant consumer protection jurisdiction under national and European law.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 318 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
(81) In order to ensure effective enforcement of this Regulation, individuals or representative organisations should be able to lodge any complaint related to compliance with this Regulation with the Digital Services Coordinator in the territory where they received the service, without prejudice to this Regulation’s rules on jurisdiction. Complaints should provide a faithful overview of concerns related to a particular intermediary service provider’s compliance and could also inform the Digital Services Coordinator of any more cross-cutting issues. The Digital Services Coordinator should involve other national competent authorities as well as the Digital Services Coordinator of another Member State, and in particular the one of the Member State where the provider of intermediary services concerned is established, if the issue requires cross- border cooperation. Whether the relevant case involve a very large online platform, the national Digital Services Coordinator that received the complaint should be able to act and take the adequate measures under this Regulation.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 320 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 85
(85) Where a Digital Services Coordinator requests another Digital Services Coordinator to take action, the requesting Digital Services Coordinator, or the Board in case it issued a recommendation to assess issues involving more than three Member States, should be able to refer the matter to the Commission in case of any disagreement as to the assessments or the measures taken or proposed or a failure to adopt any measures. The Commission, on the basis of the information made available by the concerned authorities, should accordingly be able to request the competent Digital Services Coordinator to re-assess the matter and take the necessary measures to ensure compliance within a defined time period. This possibility is without prejudice to the Commission’s general duty to oversee the application of, and where necessary enforce, Union law under the control of the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with the Treaties. A failure by the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment to take any measures pursuant to such a request may also lead to the Commission’s intervention under Section 3 of Chapter IV of this Regulation, where the suspected infringer is a very large online platform.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 330 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 95
(95) In order to address those public policy concerns it is therefore necessary to provide for a common system of enhanced supervision and enforcement at Union level. Once an infringement of one of the provisions that solely apply to very large online platforms has been identified, for instance pursuant to individual or joint investigations, auditing or complaints, the interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, upon its own initiative or upon the Board's advice, should monitor any subsequent measure taken by the very large online platform concerned as set out in its action plan. That Digital Services Coordinator should be able to ask, where appropriate, for an additional, specific audit to be carried out, on a voluntary basis, to establish whether those measures are sufficient to address the infringement. At the end of that procedure, it should inform the Board, the Commission and the platform concerned of its views on whether or not that platform addressed the infringement, specifying in particular the relevant conduct and its assessment of any measures taken. The Digital Services Coordinators should perform itstheir role under this common system in a timely manner and taking utmost account of any opinions and other advice of the Board.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 332 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 96
(96) Where the infringement of the provision that solely applies to very large online platforms is not effectively addressed by that platform pursuant to the action plan, only the Commission may, on its own initiative or upon advice of the Board, decide to further investigate the infringement concerned and the measures that the platform has subsequently taken, to the exclusion of the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment. After having conducted the necessary investigations, the Commission should be able to issue decisions finding an infringement and imposing sanctions in respect of very large online platforms where that is justified. It should also have such a possibility to intervene in cross- border situations where the relevant Digital Services Coordinator of establishments did not take any measures despite the Commission’s request, or in situations where thea Digital Services Coordinator of establishment itself requested for the Commission to intervene, in respect of an infringement of any other provision of this Regulation committed by a very large online platform.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 334 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 97
(97) The Commission should remain free to decide whether or not it wishes to intervene in any of the situations where it is empowered to do so under this Regulation. Once the Commission initiated the proceedings, the Digital Services Coordinators of establishment concerned should be precluded from exercising their investigatory and enforcement powers in respect of the relevant conduct of the very large online platform concerned, so as to avoid duplication, inconsistencies and risks from the viewpoint of the principle of ne bis in idem. However, in the interest of effectiveness, those Digital Services Coordinators should not be precluded from exercising their powers either to assist the Commission, at its request in the performance of its supervisory tasks, or in respect of other conduct, including conduct by the same very large online platform that is suspected to constitute a new infringement. Those Digital Services Coordinators, as well as the Board and other Digital Services Coordinators where relevant, should provide the Commission with all necessary information and assistance to allow it to perform its tasks effectively, whilst conversely the Commission should keep them informed on the exercise of its powers as appropriate. In that regard, the Commission should, where appropriate, take account of any relevant assessments carried out by the Board or by the Digital Services Coordinators concerned and of any relevant evidence and information gathered by them, without prejudice to the Commission’s powers and responsibility to carry out additional investigations as necessary.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 338 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 98
(98) In view of both the particular challenges that may arise in seeking to ensure compliance by very large online platforms and the importance of doing so effectively, considering their size and impact and the harms that they may cause, the Commission should have strongand the Member States should have the necessary investigative and enforcement powers to allow it to investigate, enforce and monitor certain of the rules laid down in this Regulation, in full respect of the principle of proportionality, subsidiarity and the rights and interests of the affected parties.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 340 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 99
(99) In particular, the Commission should have access to any relevant documents, data and information necessary, when acting pursuant to the powers granted under this Regulation, to open and conduct investigations and to monitor the compliance with the relevant obligations laid down in this Regulation, irrespective of who possesses the documents, data or information in question, and regardless of their form or format, their storage medium, or the precise place where they are stored. The Commission should be able to directly require that the very large online platform concerned or relevant third parties, or than individuals, provide any relevant evidence, data and information. In addition, the Commission should be able to request any relevant information from any public authority, body or agency within the Member State, or from any natural person or legal person for the purpose of this Regulation. The Commission should be empowered to require access to, and explanations relating to, data-bases and algorithms of relevant persons, and to interview, with their consent, any persons who may be in possession of useful information and to record the statements made. The Commission should also be empowered to undertake such inspections as are necessary to enforce the relevant provisions of this Regulation. Those investigatory powers aim to complement the Commission’s possibility to ask Digital Services Coordinators and other Member States’ authorities for assistance, for instance by providing information or in the exercise of those powers
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 357 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In order to facilitate smooth and efficient communications relating to matters covered by this Regulation, providers of intermediary services should be required to establish a single point of contact and to publish relevant information relating to their point of contact, including the languages to be used in such communications. The point of contact can also be used by trusted flaggers and by professional entities which are under a specific relationship with the provider of intermediary services. In contrast to the legal representative, the point of contact should serve operational purposes and should not necessarily have to have a physical location .
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 364 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Whilst the freedom of contract of providers of intermediary services should in principle be respected, it is appropriate to set certain rules on the content, application and enforcement of the terms and conditions of those providers in the interests of transparency, the protection of recipients of the service and the avoidance of unfair or arbitrary outcomes. To this end, the use of algorithmic decision- making processes should be disclosed to users whenever they are employed.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 384 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘illegal content’ means any information,, which, in itself or by its reference to an or activity which, including the sale of products or provision of services is not in compliance with Union law or the law of a Member State, irrespective of the precise subject matter or nature of that lawcriminal, administrative or civil legal framework of a Member State;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 399 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) To avoid disproportionate burdens, the additional obligations imposed on online platforms under this Regulation should not apply to micro or small enterprises as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC of the Commission,41 with the exception of those which are owned or controlled by bodies established outside the European Union, unless their reach and impact is such that they meet the criteria to qualify as very large online platforms under this Regulation. The consolidation rules laid down in that Recommendation help ensure that any circumvention of those additional obligations is prevented. The exemption of micro- and small enterprises from those additional obligations should not be understood as affecting their ability to set up, on a voluntary basis, a system that complies with one or more of those obligations. __________________ 41 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium- sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 407 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Action against illegal content can be taken more quickly and reliably where online platforms take the necessary measures to ensure that notices submitted by trusted flaggers through the notice and action mechanisms required by this Regulation are treated with priority, without prejudice to the requirement to process and decide upon all notices submitted under those mechanisms in a timely, diligent and objective manner. Such trusted flagger status should only be awarded to entities, and not individuals, that have demonstrated, among other things, that they have particular expertise and competence in tackling illegal content, that they represent collective interests and that they work in a diligent and objective manner. Such entities can be public in nature, such as, for terrorist content, internet referral units of national law enforcement authorities or of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’) or they can be non-governmental organisations and semi-public bodies, such as the organisations part of the INHOPE network of hotlines for reporting child sexual abuse material and organisations committed to notifying illegal racist and xenophobic expressions online. For intellectual property rights, organisations of industry and of right- holders could be awarded trusted flagger status, where they have demonstrated that they meet the applicable conditions. The rules of this Regulation on trusted flaggers should not be understood to prevent online platforms from giving similar treatment to notices submitted by entities or individuals that have not been awarded trusted flagger status under this Regulation, from otherwise cooperating with other entities, in accordance with the applicable law, including this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council.43 __________________ 43 Regulation(EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA, OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 418 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the illegal content if the content or activity is to be deemed illegal under Article 2 (g).
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 420 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) The misuse of services of online platforms by frequently providing manifestly illegal content or by frequently submitting manifestly unfounded notices or complaints under the mechanisms and systems, respectively, established under this Regulation undermines trust and harms the rights and legitimate interests of the parties concerned. Therefore, there is a need to put in place appropriate and proportionate safeguards against such misuse. Information should be considered to be manifestly illegal content and notices or complaints should be considered manifestly unfounded where it is evident to a layperson, without any substantive analysis, that the content is illegal respectively that the notices or complaints are unfounded. Under certain conditions, online platforms should temporarily suspend their relevant activities in respect of the person engaged in abusive behaviour. This is without prejudice to the freedom by online platforms to determine their terms and conditions and establish stricter measures in the case of manifestly illegal content related to serious crimes. For reasons of transparency, this possibility should be set out, clearly and in sufficiently detail, in the terms and conditions of the online platforms. Redress should always be open to the decisions taken in this regard by online platforms and they should be subject to oversight by the competent Digital Services Coordinator. The rules of this Regulation on misuse should not prevent online platforms from taking other measures to address the provision of illegal content by recipients of their service or other misuse of their services, in accordance with the applicable Union and national law. Those rules are without prejudice to any possibility to hold the persons engaged in misuse liable, including for damages, provided for in Union or national law.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 432 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) An online platform may in some instances become aware, such as through a notice by a notifying party or through its own voluntary measures, of information relating to certain activity of a recipient of the service, such as the provision of certain types of illegal content, that reasonably justify, having regard to all relevant circumstances of which the online platform is aware, the suspicion that the recipient may have committed, may be committing or is likely to commit a serious criminal offence involving a threat to the life or safety of person, such as offences specified in Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council44 . In such instances, the online platform should inform without delaypromptly inform the competent law enforcement authorities of such suspicion, providing all relevant information available to it, including where relevant the content in question and an explanation of its suspicion. This Regulation does not provide the legal basis for profiling of recipients of the services with a view to the possible identification of criminal offences by online platforms. Online platforms should also respect other applicable rules of Union or national law for the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals when informing law enforcement authorities. __________________ 44Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (OJ L 335, 17.12.2011, p. 1).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Providers of intermediary services shall not be deemed ineligible for the exemptions from liability referred to in Articles 3, 4 and 5 solely because they carry out voluntary own-initiative investigations or other activities aimed at detecting, identifying and removing, or disabling of access to, illegal content, or take the necessary measures to comply with the requirements of Union and national law, including those set out in this Regulation.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 442 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) To ensure an efficient and adequate application of that obligation, without imposing any disproportionate burdens, the online platforms covered should make reasonable efforts to verify the reliability of the information provided by the traders concerned, in particular by using freely available official online databases and online interfaces, such as national trade registers and the VAT Information Exchange System45 , or by requesting the traders concerned to provide trustworthy supporting documents, such as copies of identity documents, certified bank statements, company certificates and trade register certificates. They may also use other sources, available for use at a distance, which offer a similar degree of reliability for the purpose of complying with this obligation. However, the oOnline pPlatforms covered should not be required to engage in excessive or costly online fact-finding exercises or to carry out verifications on the spot. Nor should such online platforms, which have made the reasonable efforts required by this Regulation, be understood as guamay also ask for support from the Digital Services Coordinator in carrying out these specific obligations. If the trader is established outside the Union and does not cooperate or does not provide sufficient information for the verification of its compliance with the relevant Union or Member State law, this trader should not be admitted to operate and sell its products on the platform. If the trader is already on the platform and should not meet the above criteria, the platform should suspend that trader's account. The trader should be granteeingd the reliapossibility of the information towards consumer or other interested parties. Such oredress in the event of suspension of the business account. Online platforms should also design and organise their online interface in a way that enables traders to comply with their obligations under Union law, in particular the requirements set out in Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council47 and Article 3 of Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council48 . __________________ 45 https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/vies/ vieshome.do?selectedLanguage=en 46Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 47Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to- consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) 48Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 485 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) Very large online platforms should deploy the necessary means to diligently mitigate the systemic risks identified in the risk assessment. Very large online platforms should under such mitigating measures consider, for example, enhancing or otherwise adapting the design and functioning of their content moderation, algorithmic recommender systems and online interfaces, so that they discourage and limit the dissemination of illegal content, adapting their decision-making processes, or adapting their terms and conditions. They may also include corrective measures, such as discontinuing advertising revenue for specific content, or other actions, such as improving the visibility of authoritative information sources. Very large online platforms may reinforce their internal processes or supervision of any of their activities, in particular as regards the detection of systemic risks. They may also initiate or increase cooperation with trusted flaggers, organise training sessions and exchanges with trusted flagger organisations, and cooperate with other service providers, including by initiating or joining existing codes of conduct or other self-regulatory measures. Any measures adopted should respect the due diligence requirements of this Regulation and be effective and appropriate for mitigating the specific risks identified, in the interest of safeguarding public order, protecting privacy and fighting fraudulent and deceptive commercial practices, and should be proportionate in light of the very large online platform’s economic capacity and the need to avoid unnecessary restrictions on the use of their service, taking due account of potential negative effects on the fundamental rights of the recipients of the service.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 515 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
(67) The Commission and the Board should encourage the drawing-up of codes of conduct to contribute to the application of this Regulation. While the implementation of codes of conduct should be measurable and subject to public oversight, this should not impair the voluntary nature of such codes and the freedom of interested parties to decide whether to participate. In certain circumstances, it is important that very large online platforms cooperate in the drawing-up and adhere to specific codes of conduct. Nothing in this Regulation prevents other service providers from adhering to the same standards of due diligence, adopting best practices and benefitting from the guidance provided by the Commission and the Board, by participating in the same codes of conduct.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 521 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) It is appropriate that this Regulation identify certain areas of consideration for such codes of conduct. In particular, risk mitigation measures concerning specific types of illegal content, for example sharing of images depicting child sexual abuse or terrorist content, should be explored via self- and co-regulatory agreements. Another area for consideration is the possible negative impacts of systemic risks on society and democracy, such as disinformation or manipulative and abusive activities. This includes coordinated operations aimed at amplifying information, including disinformation, such as the use of bots or fake accounts for the creation of fake or misleading information, sometimes with a purpose of obtaining economic gain, which are particularly harmful for vulnerable recipients of the service, such as children. In relation to such areas, adherence to and compliance with a given code of conduct by a very large online platform may be considered as an appropriate risk mitigating measure. The refusal without proper explanations by an online platform of the Commission’s invitation to participate in the application of such a code of conduct could be taken into account, where relevant, when determining whether the online platform has infringed the obligations laid down by this Regulation.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 526 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
(69) The rules on codes of conduct under this Regulation could serve as a basis for already established self-regulatory efforts at Union level, including the Product Safety Pledge, the Memorandum of Understanding against counterfeit goods, the Code of Conduct against illegal hate speech as well as the Code of practice on disinformation. In particular for the latter, the Commission will issue guidance for strengthening the Code of practice on disinformation as announced in the European Democracy Action Plan.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 568 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91
(91) The Board should bring together the representatives of the Digital Services Coordinators and possible other competent authorities under the chairmanship of the Commission, with a view to ensuring an careful assessment of matters submitted to it in a fully European dimension. In view of possible cross-cutting elements that may be of relevance for other regulatory frameworks at Union level, the Board should be allowed to cooperate with other Union bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups with responsibilities in fields such as equality, including equality between women and men, and non- discrimination, data protection, electronic communications, audiovisual services, detection and investigation of frauds against the EU budget as regards custom duties, or consumer protection, as necessary for the performance of its tasks.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 577 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to providers of intermediary services that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC. that are not controlled or owned by entities having their establishment outside the European Union.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 583 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 98
(98) In view of both the particular challenges that may arise in seeking to ensure compliance by very large online platforms and the importance of doing so effectively, considering their size and impact and the harms that they may cause, the Commission should have strong investigative and enforcement powers to allow it to investigate, enforce and monitor certain of the rules laid down in this Regulation, in full respect of the principle of proportionality and the rights and interests of the affected parties.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 584 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 99
(99) In particular, the Commission should have access to any relevant documents, data and information necessaryThe Commission, to open and conduct investigations and to monitor the compliance with the relevant obligations laid down in this Rregulation, irrespective of who possesses the documents, data or information in question, and regardless of their form or format, their storage medium, or the precise place where they are stored. The Commission should be able to directly require that the very large online platform concerned or relevant third parties, or than individuals, provide any relevant evidence, data and information. In addition, the Commission should be able to request any relevant information from any public authority, body or agency within the Member State, or from any natural person or legal person for the purpose of this Regulation. The Commission should be empowered to require access to, and explanations relating to, data-bases and algorithms of relevant persons, and to interview, with their consent, any persons who may be in possession of useful information and to record the statements made. The Commission should also be empowered to undertake such inspections as are necessary to enforce the relevant provisions of this Regulation. Those investigatory powers aim to complement the Commission’s possibility to ask Digital Services Coordinators and other Member States’ authorities for assistance, for instance by providing information or in the exercise of those powers
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 603 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Notices that include the elements referred to in paragraph 2 shall be considered to give rise to actual knowledge or awareness for the purposes of Article 5 in respect of the specific item of information concerned.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 611 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) set out uniform rules for a safe, accessible, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 629 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
(ba) Directive (EU) 2019/882
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 632 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) whether the decision entails either the removal of, or the disabling of access to, the information and, where relevant, the territorial scope of the disabling of access and the duration;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 645 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
This Section shall not apply to online platforms that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC and that are not controlled or owned by entities having their establishment outside the European Union.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 655 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) ‘to offer services in the Union’ means enabling legal or natural persons in one or more Member States to use the services of the provider of information society services which has a substantial connection to the Union; such a substantial connection is deemed to exist where the provider has an establishment in the Union; in the absence of such an establishment, the assessment of a substantial connection is based on specific factual criteria, such as:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 658 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 1
— a significant number of users in one or more Member States; ordeleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 685 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘illegal content’ means any information,, which, in itself or by its reference to an or activity, including the sale of products or provision of services which is not in compliance with Union law or the law of a Member State, irrespective of the precise subject matter or nature of that law;criminal, administrative or civil legal framework of a Member State.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 693 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the dispute settlement is easily accessible, including for persons with disabilities, through electronic communication technology;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 699 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. If the body decides the dispute in favour of the recipient of the service, the online platform shall reimburse the recipient for any fees and other reasonable expenses that the recipient has paid or is to pay in relation to the dispute settlement. If the body decides the dispute in favour of the online platform, the recipient shall not be required to reimburse any fees or other expenses that the online platform paid or is to pay in relation to the dispute settlement.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 705 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19
[...]deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 706 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. Online platforms shall take the necessary technical and organisational measures to ensure that notices submitted by trusted flaggers through the mechanisms referred to in Article 14, are processed and decided upon with priority and without delay.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 713 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The status of trusted flaggers under this Regulation shall be awarded, upon application by any entities, by the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State in which the applicant is established, where the applicant has demonstrated to meet all of the following conditions: (a) competence for the purposes of detecting, identifying and notifying illegal content; (b) and is independent from any online platform; (c) purposes of submitting notices in a timely, diligent and objective manner.deleted it has particular expertise and it represents collective interests it carries out its activities for the
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 714 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) it has particular expertise and competence for the purposes of detecting, identifying and notifying illegal content;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 718 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) it represents collective interests and is independent from any online platform;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 723 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) it carries out its activities for the purposes of submitting notices in a timely, diligent and objective manner.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 729 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. Digital Services Coordinators shall communicate to the Commission and the Board the names, addresses and electronic mail addresses of the entities to which they have awarded the status of the trusted flagger in accordance with paragraph 2.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 731 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall publish the information referred to in paragraph 3 in a publicly available database and keep the database updated.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 735 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. Where an online platform has information indicating that a trusted flagger submitted a significant number of insufficiently precise or inadequately substantiated notices through the mechanisms referred to in Article 14, including information gathered in connection to the processing of complaints through the internal complaint-handling systems referred to in Article 17(3), it shall communicate that information to the Digital Services Coordinator that awarded the status of trusted flagger to the entity concerned, providing the necessary explanations and supporting documents.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 739 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new)
(qa) "persons with disabilities" means person within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive(EU) 2019/882;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 739 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Digital Services Coordinator that awarded the status of trusted flagger to an entity shall revoke that status if it determines, following an investigation either on its own initiative or on the basis information received by third parties, including the information provided by an online platform pursuant to paragraph 5, that the entity no longer meets the conditions set out in paragraph 2. Before revoking that status, the Digital Services Coordinator shall afford the entity an opportunity to react to the findings of its investigation and its intention to revoke the entity’s status as trusted flaggerdeleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 741 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission, after consulting the Board, may issue guidance to assist online platforms and Digital Services Coordinators in the application of paragraphs 5 and 6.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 746 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Online platforms shall suspend, for a reasonablespecified period of time and after having issued a prior warning, the provision of their services to recipients of the service that frequently provide manifestly illegal content that has been duly declared illegal as defined in Article 2(g). The online platform may request support from the Digital Service Coordinator to establish the frequency for which account suspension is deemed necessary and to set the duration of the suspension.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 753 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. Online platforms shall suspend, for a reasonablespecified period of time and after having issued at least three prior warnings, the processing of notices and complaints submitted through the notice and action mechanisms and internal complaints- handling systems referred to in Articles 14 and 17, respectively, by individuals or entities or by complainants that frequently submit notices or complaints that are manifestly unfounded.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 758 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the absolute numbers of items of manifestly illegal content or manifestly unfounded notices or complaints, submitted in the past year;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 759 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously, acts to remove or to disable access to the illegal content if the content or activity is to be deemed illegal under Article 2 (g).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 763 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The assessment must be carried out by qualified staff provided with dedicated training on the applicable legal framework.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 767 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 1 shall not apply with respect to liability under consumer protection law of online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, where such an online platform presents the specific item of information or otherwise enables the specific transaction at issue in a way that would lead an average and reasonably well-informed consumer to believe that the information, or the product or service that is the object of the transaction, is provided either by the online platform itself or by a recipient of the service who is acting under its authority or control. In addition, the liability exemption in paragraph 1 shall not apply in case an online platform allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with third-country traders when there is no economic operator inside the Union liable for the product safety on behalf of that trader.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 815 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the number of suspensions imposed pursuant to Article 20, distinguishing between suspensions enacted for the provision of manifestly illegal content, the submission of manifestly unfounded notices and the submission of manifestly unfounded complaints;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 817 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Online platforms shall publish, at least once every sixtwelve months, information on the average monthly active recipients of the service in each Member State, calculated as an average over the period of the past sixtwelve months, in accordance with the methodology laid down in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 25(2).
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 848 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The Digital Services Coordinator of establishment shall verify, at least every six months, whether the number of average monthly active recipients of the service in the Union of online platforms under their jurisdiction is equal to or higher than the number referred to in paragraph 1. On the basis of that verification, it shall adopt a decision designating the online platform as a very large online platform for the purposes of this Regulation, or terminating that designation, and communicate that decision, without undue delay, to the online platform concerned and to the Commission, the Commission and the national Digital Services Coordinators.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 861 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the dissemination and amplification of illegal content through their services;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 872 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) copyright and intellectual property infringements and violations, pursuant to Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 875 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. When conducting risk assessments, very large online platforms shall also take into account, in particular, how their content moderation systems, recommender systems and systems for selecting and displaying advertisement influence any of the systemic risks referred to in paragraph 1, including the potentially rapid and wide dissemination of illegal content and of information that is incompatible with their terms and conditions.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 886 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) adaptchecking content moderation or recommender systems, their decision- making processes, the features or functioning of their services, or their terms and conditions;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 892 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) initiating or adjusting cooperation with trusted flaggers in accordance with Article 19;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 899 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of intermediary services shall establish a single point of contact allowing for direct communication, by electronic means and by telephone, with Member States’ authorities, the Commission and the Board referred to in Article 47 for the application of this Regulation.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 904 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Providers of intermediary services shall make public, in a clear and user- friendly manner, the information necessary to easily identify and communicate with their single points of contact.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 904 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) best practices for very large online platforms to mitigate the systemic risks identifideleted.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 907 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, in cooperation with the Digital Services Coordinators, may issue general guidelines on the application of paragraph 1 in relation to specific risks, in particular to present best practices and recommend possible measures, having due regard to the possible consequences of the measures on fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of all parties involved. When preparing those guidelines the Commission shall organise public consultations.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 923 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of intermediary services shall include information on any restrictions that they impose in relation to the use of their service in respect of information provided by the recipients of the service, in their terms and conditions. That information shall include information on any policies, procedures, measures and tools used for the purpose of content moderation, including algorithmic decision-making and human review. It shall be set out in clear and unambiguous language and shall be publicly available in an easily accessible formatThe use of algorithmic decision-making processes shall be notified to users whenever they are applied. The users shall be able, where appropriate, to switch easily from interaction with the algorithmic system to human interaction. The information shall be set out in clear and unambiguous language and shall be publicly available in an easily accessible format. Providers of intermediary services shall list the restrictions in relation to the use of their service for the dissemination of content deemed illegal under Union or Member State law in a clear and user- friendly manner, and differentiate the list from the general conditions for the use of their service so as to make the user aware of what is deemed illegal under the law and what is subject to the terms and conditions for the use of the service.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 923 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Very large online platforms receiving an audit report that is not positive shall take due account of any operational recommendations addressed to them with a view to take the necessary measures to implement them. They shall, within one month from receiving those recommendations, adopt an audit implementation report setting out those measures. Where they do not implement the operational recommendations, they shall justify in the audit implementation report the reasons for not doing so and set out any alternative measures they may have taken to address any instances of non-compliance identified.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 967 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. Very large online platforms shall provide the requesting Digital Services Coordinator of establishment or the Commission, upon their reasoned request and within a reasonable period, specified in the request, access to data that are necessary to monitor and assess compliance with this Regulation. That Digital Services Coordinator and the Commission shall only use that data for those purposes.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 981 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Within 15 days following receipt of a request as referred to in paragraph 1 and 2, a very large online platform may request the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment or the Commission, as applicable, to amend the request, where it considers that it is unable to give access to the data requested because one of following two reasons:
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 987 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
The interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment or the Commission shall decide upon the request for amendment within 15 days and communicate to the very large online platform its decision and, where relevant, the amended request and the new time period to comply with the request.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 991 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the number of complaints received through the internal complaint-handling system referred to in Article 17, the basis for those complaints, decisions taken in respect of those complaints, measures and tools used for the purpose of content moderation, including the impact of algorithmic decision-making compared to human review, the average time needed for taking those decisions and the number of instances where those decisions were reversed.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 992 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) cooperating with the Digital Services Coordinator of establishments and the Commission for the purpose of this Regulation;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 994 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. Very large online platforms shall communicatemake public the name and contact details of the compliance officer to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment and the Commission.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1000 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In addition to the reports provided for in Article 13, very large online platforms shall make publicly available and transmit to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishments and the Commission, at least once a year and within 30 days following the adoption of the audit implementing report provided for in Article 28(4):
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1005 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. Where a very large online platform considers that the publication of information pursuant to paragraph 2 may result in the disclosure of confidential information of that platform or of the recipients of the service, may cause significant vulnerabilities for the security of its service, may undermine public security or may harm recipients, the platform may remove such information from the reports. In that case, that platform shall transmit the complete reports to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishments and the Commission, accompanied by a statement of the reasons for removing the information from the public reports.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1008 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) electronic submission of notices by trusted flaggers under Article 19, including through application programming interfaces;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1017 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Where significant systemic risk within the meaning of Article 26(1) emerge and concern several very large online platforms, the Commission, in agreement with the Board, may invite the very large online platforms concerned, other very large online platforms, other online platforms and other providers of intermediary services, as appropriate, as well as civil society organisations and other interested parties, to participate in the drawing up of codes of conduct, including by setting out commitments to take specific risk mitigation measures, as well as a regular reporting framework on any measures taken and their outcomes.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1025 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. When giving effect to paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission and the Board shall aim to ensure that the codes of conduct clearly set out their objectives, contain key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives and take due account of the needs and interests of all interested parties, including citizens, at Union level. The Commission and the Board shall also aim to ensure that participants report regularly to the Commission and their respective Digital Service Coordinators of establishment on any measures taken and their outcomes, as measured against the key performance indicators that they contain.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1032 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The mechanisms referred to in paragraph 1 shall be such as to facilitate the submission of sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated notices, on the basis of which a diligentn economic operator can identify the illegality of the content in quesestablish, in a diligent manner and without discrimination, whether the notice concerns illegal content as defined in Article 2(g) of these Regulations. To that end, the providers shall take the necessary measures to enable and facilitate the submission of notices containing all of the following elements:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1037 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) an explanation of the reasons why the individual or entity considers the information in question to be illegal content. The possibility of identifying, on the basis of a list drawn up in agreement with the Digital Service Coordinator, the type of illegal content to which the individual or entity presumes the reported content below, to should also be foreseen;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1049 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that their Digital Services Coordinators are informed by the relevant national, local and regional authorities on the diversity of platform sectors and issues covered by this Regulation;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1052 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State in which the main establishment of the provider of intermediary services is located shall have jurisdiction for the purposes of Chapters III and IV of this Regulation. With regard to very large online platforms that offer services in the Union, Member States where individuals or representative organisations received their services shall have jurisdiction.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1053 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Notices that include the elements referred to in paragraph 2 shall be considered to give rise to actual knowledge or awareness for the purposes of Article 5 in respect of the specific item of information concerned.deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1057 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The provisions of this article are without prejudice to the relevant consumer protection jurisdiction under the applicable Union and national law.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1068 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
Recipients of the service shall have the right to lodge a complaint against providers of intermediary services alleging an infringement of this Regulation with the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the recipient resides or is established. The Digital Services Coordinator shall assess the complaint and, where appropriate and where providers are not qualified under Article 25, transmit it to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment. Where the complaint falls under the responsibility of another competent authority in its Member State, the Digital Service Coordinator receiving the complaint shall transmit it to that authority.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1081 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where the Board has reasons to suspect that a provider of intermediary services infringed this Regulation in a manner involving at least three Member States, it may recommend the interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishments to assess the matter and take the necessary investigatory and enforcement measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1087 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 3
3. The interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment(s) shall take into utmost account the request or recommendation pursuant to paragraph 1. Where it considers that it has insufficient information to act upon the request or recommendation and has reasons to consider that the Digital Services Coordinator that sent the request, or the Board, could provide additional information, it may request such information. The time period laid down in paragraph 4 shall be suspended until that additional information is provided.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1090 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 4
4. The interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment(s) shall, without undue delay and in any event not later than two months following receipt of the request or recommendation, communicate to the Digital Services Coordinator that sent the request, or the Board, its assessment of the suspected infringement, or that of any other competent authority pursuant to national law where relevant, and an explanation of any investigatory or enforcement measures taken or envisaged in relation thereto to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1091 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Digital Services Coordinator that sent the request, or, where appropriate, the Board, did not receive a reply within the time period laid down in paragraph 4 or where it does not agree with the assessment of the requested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment(s), it may refer the matter to the Commission, providing all relevant information. That information shall include at least the request or recommendation sent to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, any additional information provided pursuant to paragraph 3 and the communication referred to in paragraph 4.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1094 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall assess the matter within three months following the referral of the matter pursuant to paragraph 5, after having consulted the interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment(s) and, unless it referred the matter itself, the Board.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1097 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 7
7. Where, pursuant to paragraph 6, the Commission concludes that the assessment or the investigatory or enforcement measures taken or envisaged pursuant to paragraph 4 are incompatible with this Regulation, it shall request the Digital Service Coordinator of establishment(s) to further assess the matter and take the necessary investigatory or enforcement measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation, and to inform it about those measures taken within two months from that request.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1102 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2
2. Where a Digital Services Coordinator of establishment has reasons to suspect that a very large online platform infringed this Regulation, it may request the Commission to take the necessary investigatory and enforcement measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation in accordance with Section 3. Such a request shall contain all information listed in Article 45(2) and set out the reasons for requesting the Commission to intervene.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1106 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) whether the decision entails either the removal of, or the disabling of access to, the information and, where relevant, the territorial scope of the disabling of access and the duration;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1110 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) where applicable, information on the use made of automated means in taking the decision, including where the decision was taken in respect of content detected or identified using automated means;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1111 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where thea Digital Services 1. Coordinator of establishment adopts a decision finding that a very large online platform has infringed any of the provisions of Section 4 of Chapter III, it shall make use of the enhanced supervision system laid down in this Article. It shall take utmost account of any opinion and recommendation of the Commission and the Board pursuant to this Article.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1113 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission acting on its own initiative, or the Board acting on its own initiative or upon request of at least three Digital Services Coordinators of destination, may, where it has reasons to suspect that a very large online platform infringed any of those provisions, recommend the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment to investigate the suspected infringement with a view to thate interested Digital Services Coordinator(s) adopting such a decision within a reasonable time period.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1117 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. When communicating the decision referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 to the very large online platform concerned, thea Digital Services Coordinator of establishment shall request it to draw up and communicate to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Commission and the Board, within one month from that decision, an action plan, specifying how that platform intends to terminate or remedy the infringement. The measures set out in the action plan may include, where appropriate, participation in a code of conduct as provided for in Article 35.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1118 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Within one month following receipt 3. of the action plan, the Board shall communicate its opinion on the action plan to the relevant Digital Services Coordinator of establishment. Within one month following receipt of that opinion, that Digital Services Coordinator shall decide whether the action plan is appropriate to terminate or remedy the infringement.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1120 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where thea Digital Services Coordinator of establishment has concerns on the ability of the measures to terminate or remedy the infringement, it may request the very large online platform concerned to subject itself to an additional, independent audit to assess the effectiveness of those measures in terminating or remedying the infringement. In that case, that platform shall send the audit report to that Digital Services Coordinator, the Commission and the Board within four months from the decision referred to in the first subparagraph. When requesting such an additional audit, the Digital Services Coordinator may specify a particular audit organisation that is to carry out the audit, at the expense of the platform concerned, selected on the basis of criteria set out in Article 28(2).
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1121 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment shall communicate to the Commission, the Board and the very large online platform concerned its views as to whether the very large online platform has terminated or remedied the infringement and the reasons thereof. It shall do so within the following time periods, as applicable:
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1122 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Pursuant to that communication, the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment shall no longer be entitled to take any investigatory or enforcement measures in respect of the relevant conduct by the very large online platform concerned, without prejudice to Article 66 or any other measures that it may take at the request of the Commission.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1125 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) is suspected of having infringed any of the provisions of this Regulation and theany Digital Services Coordinator of establishment did not take anydid take investigatory or enforcement measures, pursuant to the request of the Commission referred to in Article 45(7), upon the expiry of the time period set in that request;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1126 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) is suspected of having infringed any of the provisions of this Regulation and thea Digital Services Coordinator of establishment requested the Commission to intervene in accordance with Article 46(2), upon the reception of that request;
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1129 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
As regards points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1, pursuant to that notification, the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment concerned shall no longer be entitled to take any investigatory or enforcement measures in respect of the relevant conduct by the very large online platform concerned, without prejudice to Article 66 or any other measures that it may take at the request of the Commission.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1131 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54
1. assigned to it under this Section, the Commission may conduct on-site inspections at the premises of the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1). 2.Article 54 deleted Power to conduct on-site inspections In order to carriedy out with the assistance of auditors or experts appointed by the Commission pursuant to Article 57(2). 3. Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may require the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) to provide explanations on its organisation, functioning, IT system, algorithms, data- handling and business conducts. The Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may address questions to key personnel of the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1). 4. concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) is required to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by decision of the Commission. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the visit, set the date on which it is to begin and indicate the penalties provided for in Articles 59 and 60 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union.the tasks On-site inspections may also be During on-site inspections the The very large online platform
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1136 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall adopt a non- compliance decision, after consulting the Board, where it finds that the very large online platform concerned does not comply with one or more of the following:
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1137 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commission finds that the conditions of paragraph 1 are not met, it shall close the investigation by a decision, approved by the Board.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1139 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) refuse to submit to an on-site inspection pursuant to Article 54.deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1140 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
This Section shall not apply to online platforms that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC, with the exception of those owned or controlled by bodies outside the Union.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1140 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3
3. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) and to the Board.
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1141 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) submit to an on-site inspection which it has ordered by decision pursuant to Article 54;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1142 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) on-site inspection;deleted
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1143 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where all powers pursuant to this Article to bring about the cessation of an infringement of this Regulation have been exhausted, the infringement persists and causes serious harm which cannot be avoided through the exercise of other powers available under Union or national law, the Commission may request the interested Digital Services Coordinator of establishment ofto act pursuant to Article 41(3) towards the very large online platform concerned to act pursuant to Article 41(3).
2021/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1148 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Online platforms shall provide recipients of the service, for a period of at least six months following the decision referred to in this paragraph, the access to an effective and user-friendly internal complaint-handling system, which enables the complaints to be lodged electronically and free of charge, against the following decisions taken by the online platform on the ground that the information provided by the recipients is illegal content or incompatible with its terms and conditions:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1176 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Online platforms shall ensure that their internal complaint-handling systems are easy to access, user-friendly and enable and facilitate the submission of sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated complaints. The complainant shall be able to enter free written explanations in addition to the pre-established complaint options.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1185 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Online platforms shall handle complaints submitted through their internal complaint-handling system in a timely, diligent and objectiveobjective and transparent manner. Where a complaint contains sufficient grounds for the online platform to consider that the information to which the complaint relates is not illegal and is not incompatible with its terms and conditions, or contains information indicating that the complainant’s conduct does not warrant the suspension or termination of the service or the account, it shall reverse its decision referred to in paragraph 1 without undue delay.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1187 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. Online platforms shall promptly inform complainants without undue delay of the decision they have taken in respect of the information to which the complaint relates and shall inform complainants of the possibility of out-of-court dispute settlement provided for in Article 18 and other available redress possibilities.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1224 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the dispute settlement is easily accessible, including for persons with disabilities, through electronic communication technology;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1229 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) it is capable of settling dispute in a swift, efficient, accessible for persons with disabilities, and cost-effective manner and in at least one official language of the Union and at least in the language of the recipient to whom the decision referred to in Article 17 is addressed;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1238 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the dispute settlement takes place in accordance with clear and fairtransparent rules of procedure.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1246 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
If the body decides the dispute in favour of the recipient of the service, the online platform shall reimburse the recipient for any fees and other reasonable expenses that the recipient has paid or is to pay in relation to the dispute settlement. If the body decides the dispute in favour of the online platform, the recipient shall not be required to reimburse any fees or other expenses that the online platform paid or is to pay in relation to the dispute settlement.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1258 #
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1319 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Online platforms shall suspend, for a reasonablespecified period of time and after having issued a prior warning, the provision of their services to recipients of the service that frequently provide manifestly illegal content that has been duly declared illegal as defined in Article 2(g). The online platform may request support from the Digital Service Coordinator to establish the frequency for which account suspension is deemed necessary and to set the duration of the suspension.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1331 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. Online platforms shall suspend, for a reasonablespecified period of time and after having issued at least three prior warnings, the processing of notices and complaints submitted through the notice and action mechanisms and internal complaints- handling systems referred to in Articles 14 and 17, respectively, by individuals or entities or by complainants that frequently submit notices or complaints that are manifestly unfounded.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1335 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the absolute numbers of items of manifestly illegal content or manifestly unfounded notices or complaints, submitted in the past year;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1341 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The assessment must be carried out by qualified staff provided with dedicated training on the applicable legal framework.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1359 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Where the online platform cannot identify with reasonable certainty the Member State concerned, it shall inform without undue delay the law enforcement authorities of the Member State in which it is established or has its legal representative or inform Europol.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1374 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where an online platform allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, it shall ensure that traders can only use its services to promote messages on or to offer products or services to consumers located in the Union if, prior to the use of its services, the online platform has obtained the following information:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1384 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the bank account details of the trader, where the trader is a natural person;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1394 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) a self-certification by the trader committing to only offerthat products or services thatprovided comply with the applicable rules of Union lawrelevant Union or national law on product safety and product compliance.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1401 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. The online platform shall, upon receiving that information, make reasonable efforts to assessassess, with the support of the Digital Service Coordinator if needed, whether the information referred to in points (a), (d) and (e) of paragraph 1 is reliable through the use of any freely accessible official online database or online interface made available by a Member States or the Union or through requests to the trader to provide supporting documents from reliable sourcesand official sources. Online platforms allowing distance contracts with third-country traders shall establish that the third-country trader complies with the relevant Union or national law on product safety and product compliance before giving them access its services offered in the Union and, where appropriate, with the support of the Digital service Coordinator. The Digital Service Coordinator may request support from market surveillance or customs authorities to assess the information provided by the trader.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1430 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The online platform shall store the information obtained pursuant to paragraph 1 and 2 in a secure manner for the duration of their contractual relationship with the trader concerned. They shall subsequently, asking the trader to notify any changes and confirm the information held by the online platform once a year. After the contractual relationship has ended, the online platform shall delete the information.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1469 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the number of suspensions imposed pursuant to Article 20, distinguishing between suspensions enacted for the provision of manifestly illegal content, the submission of manifestly unfounded notices and the submission of manifestly unfounded complaints;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1474 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Online platforms shall publish, at least once every sixtwelve months, information on the average monthly active recipients of the service in each Member State, calculated as an average over the period of the past sixtwelve months, in accordance with the methodology laid down in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 25(2).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1477 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Online platforms shall communicate to the Digital Services Coordinators of establishmentthe Member States, upon itstheir request, the information referred to in paragraph 2, updated to the moment of such request. Thate Digital Services Coordinators may require the online platform to provide additional information as regards the calculation referred to in that paragraph, including explanations and substantiation in respect of the data used. That information shall not include personal data.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1499 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Special attention shall be given to recipients of the service who are minors. When advertising is addressed to minors, online platforms shall indicate in a clear, easy and unambiguous manner that such advertising targets this group of recipients.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1592 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. When conducting risk assessments, very large online platforms shall also take into account, in particular, how their content moderation systems, recommender systems and systems for selecting and displaying advertisement influence any of the systemic risks referred to in paragraph 1, including the potentially rapid and wide dissemination of illegal content and of information that is incompatible with their terms and conditions.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1607 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Very large online platforms shall put in place reasonable, proportionate and effectivproportionate mitigation measures, tailored to the specific systemic risks identified pursuant to Article 26. Such measures may include, where applicable:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1611 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) adaptchecking content moderation or recommender systems, their decision- making processes, the features or functioning of their services, or their terms and conditions;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1617 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) initiating or adjusting cooperation with trusted flaggers in accordance with Article 19;deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1633 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Board, in cooperation with the Commission, shall publish comprehensive reports, once a year, which shall include the following:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1639 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) best practices for very large online platforms to mitigate the systemic risks identifideleted.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1642 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, in cooperation with the Digital Services Coordinators, may issue general guidelines on the application of paragraph 1 in relation to specific risks, in particular to present best practices and recommend possible measures, having due regard to the possible consequences of the measures on fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of all parties involved. When preparing those guidelines the Commission shall organise public consultations.deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1668 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) have proven expertise in the area of risk management, technical competence and capabilities certified by qualified and accredited certification body;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1680 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Very large online platforms receiving an audit report that is not positive shall take due account of any operational recommendations addressed to them with a view to take the necessary measures to implement them. They shall, within one month from receiving those recommendations, adopt an audit implementation report setting out those measures. Where they do not implement the operational recommendations, they shall justify in the audit implementation report the reasons for not doing so and set out any alternative measures they may have taken to address any instances of non-compliance identified.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1726 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) whether the advertisement was intended to be displayed specifically to one or more particular groups of recipients of the service and if so, the main parameters used for that purpose;deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1751 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. Very large online platforms shall provide the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Digital Services Coordinator of destination or the Commission, upon their reasoned request and within a reasonable period, specified in the request, access to data that are necessary to monitor and assess compliance with this Regulation. That Digital Services Coordinator and the Commission shall only use that data for those purposes.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1756 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Upon a reasoned request from the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Digital Services Coordinator of destination or the Commission, very large online platforms shall, within a reasonable period, as specified in the request, provide access to data to vetted researchers who meet the requirements in paragraphs 4 of this Article, for the sole purpose of conducting research that contributes to the identification and understanding of systemic risks as set out in Article 26(1).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1785 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
The Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Digital Services Coordinator of destination or the Commission shall decide upon the request for amendment within 15 days and communicate to the very large online platform its decision and, where relevant, the amended request and the new time period to comply with the request.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1792 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) cooperating with the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Digital Services Coordinator of destination and the Commission for the purpose of this Regulation;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1794 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. Very large online platforms shall communicate the name and contact details of the compliance officer to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishments and the Commission.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1818 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) electronic submission of notices by trusted flaggers under Article 19, including through application programming interfaces;deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1852 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Where significant systemic risk within the meaning of Article 26(1) emerge and concern several very large online platforms, the Commission may inv, in agreement witeh the very largBoard, may invite online platforms concerned, other very large online platforms, other online platforms and other providers of intermediary services, as appropriate, as well as civil society organisations and other interested parties, to participate in the drawing up of codes of conduct, including by setting out commitments to take specific risk mitigation measures, as well as a regular reporting framework on any measures taken and their outcomes.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1916 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that their Digital Services Coordinators are informed by the relevant national, local and regional authorities on the diversity of platform sectors and issues covered by this Regulation;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1925 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 2 is without prejudice to the tasks of Digital Services Coordinators within the system of supervision and enforcement provided for in this Regulation and the cooperation with other competent authorities in accordance with Article 38(2). Paragraph 2 shall not prevent supervision of the authorities concerned in accordance with national constitutional law.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1934 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. Where a provider of intermediary services fails to appoint a legal representative in accordance with Article 11, all Member States shall have jurisdiction for the purposes of Chapters III and IV. Where a Member State decides to exercise jurisdiction under this paragraph, it shall inform all other Member States andto ensure that the principle of ne bis in idem is respected.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1950 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) require the management body of the providers, within a reasonable time period, to examine the situation, adopt and submit an action plan setting out the necessary measures to terminate the infringement, ensure that the provider takes those measures, and report on the measures taken within a specific period;
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1952 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) where the Digital Services Coordinator considers that the provider has not sufficiently complied with the requirements of the first indent, that the infringement persists and causes serious harm, and that the infringement entails a serious criminal offence involving a threat to the life or safety of persons, request the competent judicial authority of that Member State to order the temporary restriction of access of recipients of the service concerned by the infringement or, only where that is not technically feasible, to the online interface of the provider of intermediary services on which the infringement takes place.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2051 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1
1. The Board shall be composed of the Digital Services Coordinators, who shall be represented by high-level officials. Where provided for by national law, other competent authorities entrusted with specific operational responsibilities for the application and enforcement of this Regulation alongside the Digital Services Coordinator shall participate in the Board. Other national authorities may be invited to the meetings, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them. The meeting is deemed valid when at least two third of the eligible members are present.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2056 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Board shall adopt its acts by simple majority. In the event of a tied vote, the vote shall be considered void and a new vote shall be held by the Board.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2103 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. When communicating the decision referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 to the very large online platform concerned, the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment shall request it to draw up and communicate to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment, the Commission and the Board, within one month from that decision, an action plan, specifying how that platform intends to terminate or remedy the infringement. The measures set out in the action plan may includerecommend, where appropriate, participation in a code of conduct as provided for in Article 35.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2127 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Where the Commission decides to initiate proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall notify all Digital Services Coordinators, the Board and the very large online platform concerned. If the Commission decides not to initiate proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall inform the Board in writing of its reasons.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2155 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54
Power to conduct on-site inspections 1. In order to carry out the tasks assigned to it under this Section, the Commission may conduct on-site inspections at the premises of the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1). 2. On-site inspections may also be carried out with the assistance of auditors or experts appointed by the Commission pursuant to Article 57(2). 3. During on-site inspections the Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may require the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) to provide explanations on its organisation, functioning, IT system, algorithms, data- handling and business conducts. The Commission and auditors or experts appointed by it may address questions to key personnel of the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1). 4. concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) is required to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by decision of the Commission. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the visit, set the date on which it is to begin and indicate the penalties provided for in Articles 59 and 60 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union.Article 54 deleted The very large online platform
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2165 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. In the context of proceedings which may lead to the adoption of a decision of non-compliance pursuant to Article 58(1), where there is an urgency due to the risk of serious damage for the recipients of the service, the Commission may, by decision, and after consulting the Board, order interim measures against the very large online platform concerned on the basis of a prima facie finding of an infringement.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2171 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1
1. If, during proceedings under this Section, the very large online platform concerned offers commitments to ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, the Commission may, by decision and after consulting the Board, make those commitments binding on the very large online platform concerned and declare that there are no further grounds for action.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2176 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission considers that the commitments offered by the very large online platform concerned are unable to ensure effective compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, it shall reject those commitments in a reasoned decision, in agreement with the Board, when concluding the proceedings.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2187 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall adopt a non- compliance decision, after consulting the Board, where it finds that the very large online platform concerned does not comply with one or more of the following:
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2203 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commission finds that the conditions of paragraph 1 are not met, it shall close the investigation by a decision approved by the Board.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2218 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) refuse to submit to an on-site inspection pursuant to Article 54.deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2219 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3
3. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the very large online platform concerned or other person referred to in Article 52(1) and to the Board.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2228 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) submit to an on-site inspection which it has ordered by decision pursuant to Article 54;deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2235 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) on-site inspection;deleted
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2265 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Prior to making such request to the Digital Services Coordinator, the Commission shall invite interested parties to submit written observations within a time period that shall not be less than two weeks, describing14 days, the measures it intends to request and identifying the intended addressee or addressees thereof.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
(46) To further address key supply chain risks and assist entities operating in sectors covered by this Directive to appropriately manage supply chain and supplier related cybersecurity risks, the Cooperation Group involving relevant national authorities, in cooperation with the Commission and, ENISA and the affected essential and important entities, should carry out coordinated sectoral supply chain risk assessments, as was already done for 5G networks following Recommendation (EU) 2019/534 on Cybersecurity of 5G networks21 , with the aim of identifying per sector which are the critical ICT services, systems or products, relevant threats and vulnerabilities. __________________ 21Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/534 of 26 March 2019 Cybersecurity of 5G networks (OJ L 88, 29.3.2019, p. 42).
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
(47) The supply chain risk assessments, in light of the features of the sector concerned, should take into account both technical and, where relevantjustified by the criticality of the sector, non- technical factors including those defined in Recommendation (EU) 2019/534, in the EU wide coordinated risk assessment of 5G networks security and in the EU Toolbox on 5G cybersecurity agreed by the Cooperation Group. These assessments should be evidence-based and their results clearly defined. To identify the supply chains that should be subject to a coordinated risk assessment, the following criteria should be taken into account: (i) the extent to which essential and important entities use and rely on specific critical ICT services, systems or products; (ii) the relevance of specific critical ICT services, systems or products for performing critical or sensitive functions, including the processing of personal data; (iii) the availability of alternative ICT services, systems or products; (iv) the resilience of the overall supply chain of ICT services, systems or products against disruptive events and (v) for emerging ICT services, systems or products, their potential future significance for the entities’ activities.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 55
(55) This Directive lays down a two- stage approach to incident reporting in order to strike the right balance between, on the one hand, swift reporting that helps mitigate the potential spread of incidents and allows entities to seek support, and, on the other hand, in-depth reporting that draws valuable lessons from individual incidents and improves over time the resilience to cyber threats of individual companies and entire sectors. Where entities become aware of an incident, they should be required to submit an initial notification within 24out undue delay and not later than 72 hours, followed by a final report not later than one2 months after. The initial notification should only include the information strictly necessary to make the competent authorities aware of the incident and allow the entity to seek assistance, if required. Such notification, where applicable, should indicate whether the incident is presumably caused by unlawful or malicious action. Member States should ensure that the requirement to submit this initial notification does not divert the reporting entity’s resources from activities related to incident handling that should be prioritised. To further prevent that incident reporting obligations either divert resources from incident response handling or may otherwise compromise the entities efforts in that respect, Member States should also provide that, in duly justified cases and in agreement with the competent authorities or the CSIRT, the entity concerned can deviate from the deadlines of 724 hours for the initial notification and one2 months for the final report.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 70
(70) In order to strengthen the supervisory powers and actions that help ensure effective compliance and to achieve a common high level of security within the digital sector throughout the Union, this Directive should provide for a minimum list of supervisory actions and means through which competent authorities may supervise essential and important entities. In addition, this Directive should establish a differentiation of supervisory regime between essential and important entities with a view to ensuring a fair balance of obligations for both entities and competent authorities. Thus, essential entities should be subject to a fully-fledged supervisory regime (ex-ante and ex-post), while important entities should be subject to a light supervisory regime, ex-post only. For the latter, this means that important entities should not document systematically compliance with cybersecurity risk management requirements, while competent authorities should implement a reactive ex -post approach to supervision and, hence, not have a general obligation to supervise those entities, except where there is a manifest breach of obligations, in particular where such entities cause risk for users or other services included in the scope of this Directive.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 76
(76) In order to further strengthen the effectiveness and dissuasiveness of the penalties applicable to infringements of obligations laid down pursuant to this Directive, the competent authorities should be empowered to apply sanctions consisting of the suspension of a certification or authorisation concerning part or all thethe implicated services provided by an essential entity and the imposition of a temporary ban from the exercise of managerial functions by a natural person. Given their severity and impact on the entities’ activities and ultimately on their consumers, such sanctions should only be applied proportionally to the severity of the infringement and taking account of the specific circumstances of each case, including the intentional or negligent character of the infringement, actions taken to prevent or mitigate the damage and/or losses suffered. Such sanctions should only be applied as ultima ratio, meaning only after the other relevant enforcement actions laid down by this Directive have been exhausted, and only for the time until the entities to which they apply take the necessary action to remedy the deficiencies or comply with the requirements of the competent authority for which such sanctions were applied. The imposition of such sanctions shall be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with the general principles of Union law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including effective judicial protection, due process, presumption of innocence and right of defence.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 133 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive applies to public and private entities of a type referred to as essential entities in Annex I and as important entities in Annex II. Entities and subsectors that fall within the scope of this Directive shall be provided with clear and concise definitions with respect to their designations. This Directive does not apply to entities that Member States unequivocally identify as non-critical, including where they are of types referred to in Annex I and Annex II. This Directive does not apply to entities that qualify as micro and small enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.28, without prejudice to their voluntary involvement. __________________ 28 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium- sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new)
(26a) 'non-critical entity' means any entity of a type referred to in Annex I and Annex II which, regardless of its size and resources, has no critical function within a specific sector or type of service provided and has a low level of dependency from other sectors or types of services.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a governance framework to achieve those objectives and priorities, including the policies referred to in paragraph 2 and the roles and responsibilities of public bodies and entities as well as other relevant actors, in particular those entrusted with specific SMEs support. The governance framework shall clearly outline how cooperation and coordination is organised between relevant national authorities designated under this Directive;
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) a policy addressing specific needs of SMEs in fulfilling the provisions laid down by this Directive, in particular those excluded from the scope of this Directive, in relation to guidance and support in improving their resilience to cybersecurity threats. and encouraging, through dedicated support, their proactive adoption of suitable cybersecurity measures;
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate one of its CSIRTs as referred to in Article 9 as a coordinator for the purpose of coordinated vulnerability disclosure. The process of coordinated vulnerability disclosure shall be coherent with internationally recognised standards on vulnerability handling and disclosure. The designated CSIRT shall act as a trusted intermediary, facilitating, where necessary, the interaction between the reporting entity and the manufacturer or provider of ICT products or ICT services. Where the reported vulnerability concerns multiple manufacturers or providers of ICT products or ICT services across the Union, the designated CSIRT of each Member State concerned shall cooperate with the CSIRT network.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. ENISA shall develop and maintain a European vulnerability registry. To that end, ENISA shall establish and maintain the appropriate information systems, policies and procedures, as well as the necessary technical and organisational measures for the security of the registry, with a view in particular to enabling important and essential entities and their suppliers of network and information systems to disclose and register vulnerabilities present in ICT products or ICT services, as well as to provide access to the information on vulnerabilities contained in the registry to all interested parties. ENISA shall clarify the terms of work and use of registry, including procedures for reporting, use and storage of the vulnerability information. The registry shall, in particular, include information describing the vulnerability, the affected ICT product or ICT services and the severity of the vulnerability in terms of the circumstances under which it may be exploited, the availability of related patches and, in the absence of available patches, guidance addressed to users of vulnerable products and services as to how the risks resulting from disclosed vulnerabilities may be mitigated.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate one or more competent authorities responsible for the management of large- scale incidents and crises. Where a Member State designates more than one competent authority, it should clearly indicate which of these competent authorities would serve as the main point of contact during a large-scale incident or crisis. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have adequate resources to perform, in an effective and efficient manner, the tasks assigned to them.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) providing practical and operational guidance to essential and important entities in cybersecurity response and prevention activities, including in particular dedicated technical support to SMEs;
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 206 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that essential and important entities shall take appropriate and proportionate technical and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of network and information systems which those entities use in the provision of their services. These measures shall be adopted following a risk-based assessment that takes the utmost account of the level of criticality of the concerned entities. Having regard to the state of the art, those measures shall ensure a level of security of network and information systems appropriate to the risk presented and shall not undermine valid security offering mechanisms already in place.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 221 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The Cooperation Group, in cooperation with the Commission and ENISA, and after having consulted the affected essential and important entities, may carry out coordinated security risk assessments of specific critical ICT services, systems or products supply chains, taking into account technical and, where relevant, non-technical risk factorjustified by the level of criticality of the sector, non-technical risk factors. Risk assessments should follow a balanced and non-discriminatory approach to ensure competitive and harmonised internal market, with coordinated Member State approaches.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 223 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, after consulting with the Cooperation Group and, ENISA and the affected essential and important entities, shall identify the specific critical ICT services, systems or products that may be subject to the coordinated risk assessment referred to in paragraph 1.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 224 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19a When the Cooperation Group includes non-technical risk factors in its supply chain risk assessments, it shall ensure that those factors are evidence-based, clearly defined and that their interpretation is aligned across the Union to the greatest extent possible. Member States shall ensure that any affected party has clear and lawful means to raise concerns, challenge and object to the final decision taken as a result of the supply chain assessments referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that essential and important entities may notify, without undue delay where feasible or through periodic threat analysis reports, the competent authorities or the CSIRT of any significant cyber threat that those entities identify that could have potentially resulted in a significant incidentwithin the meaning of Article 2(8) of Regulation (EU) 2019/881.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) without undue delay and in any event winot later thian 724 hours after having become aware of the incident, an initial notification, which, where applicable and possible, shall indicate whether the incident is presumably caused by unlawful or malicious action;
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) a final report not later than onetwo months after the submission of the report under point (a), including at least the following:
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 5
5. In compliance with Union law, ENISA shall support the establishment of cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements referred to in paragraph 2 by providing best practices and guidance with the aim of promoting the cross-border exchange of information at Union level between the relevant entities.
2021/06/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The European Green Deal24 is Europe’s growth strategy that aims to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use. A shift from the use of fossil fuels in vehicles to electromobility is one of the prerequisites for reaching the climate neutrality goal in 2050. In order for the Union's product policies to contribute to lowering carbon emissions on a global level, it needs to be ensured that products marketed and sold in the Union are sourced and manufactured in a sustainable manner and if possible in the Union. _________________ 24Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The European Green Deal (COM (2019) 640 final).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Substituting scarce raw materials with cheaper and more widely available materials is crucial to reducing the Union’s dependence on third countries in the long term, to decreasing the impact of battery production on the environment, to creating more jobs in the Union and to reducing costs. It is therefore vital that the Union and the Member States step up support for European companies' research and development initiatives concerning the substitution of such materials.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) The sell-by date, after which batteries of general use should no longer be sold, shall be clearly indicated.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61 a (new)
(61a) Fair competition must be established and only those who comply with EU rules shall have access to the market. The Commission shall limit access to the European market for companies known to have undignified working conditions, use child labour or release large quantities of waste in deep water.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 99
(99) Public procurement constitutes an important sector with regard to reducing the impacts on the environment of human activities and to stimulate market transformation towards more sustainable products. Contracting authorities, as defined in Directive 2014/24/EU63 of the European Parliament and of the Council63 and Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council64, and contracting entities as defined in Directive 2014/25/EU should take account of the environmental impacts when procuring batteries or products containing batteries, in order to promote and stimulateencourage more local and European stakeholders to join the market for clean and energy-efficient mobility and energy-storage and thus contribute to the environment, climate and energy policy objectives of the Union. _________________ 63Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65). 64 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. If an authority of a Member State identifies a battery that is labelled 'compliant' but actually poses a serious and urgent risk to human health, the safety of goods or the environment, it shall take the requisite measures to eliminate the risk and shall immediately inform the Commission. The Commission shall inform the other Member States and adopt immediately applicable implementing acts.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 600 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 2 – point g
(g) labour rights, including child labour and labour in undignified conditions;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) It is necessary to improve the conditions for data sharing in the internal market, by creating a harmonised framework for data exchanges. Sector- specific legislation can develop, adapt and propose new and complementary elements, depending on the specificities of the sector, such as the envisaged legislation on the European health data space25 and on access to vehicle data. Moreover, certain sectors of the economy are already regulated by sector-specific Union law that include rules relating to cross-border or Union wide sharing or access to data26 . This Regulation is therefore without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council27, and in particular the implementation of this Regulation shall not prevent cross border transfers of data in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 from taking place, Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council28, Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council29, Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council30, Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council31, Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council32, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council33, Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council34, Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35, Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council36, as well as Regulation 2018/858/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council37, Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council38 and Delegated Regulations adopted on its basis, and any other sector-specific Union legislation that organises the access to and re-use of data. This Regulation should be without prejudice to the access and use of data for the purpose of international cooperation in the context of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties. A horizontal regime for the re-use of certain categories of protected data held by public sector bodies, the provision of data sharing services and of services based on data altruism in the Union should be established. Specific characteristics of different sectors may require the design of sectoral data-based systems, while building on the requirements of this Regulation. Where a sector-specific Union legal act requires public sector bodies, providers of data sharing services or registered entities providing data altruism services to comply with specific additional technical, administrative or organisational requirements, including through an authorisation or certification regime, those provisions of that sector-specific Union legal act should also apply. __________________ 25 See: Annexes to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Commission Work Programme 2021 (COM(2020) 690 final). 26For example, Directive 2011/24/EU in the context of the European Health Data Space, and relevant transport legislation such as Directive 2010/40/EU, Regulation 2019/1239 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1056, in the context of the European Mobility Data Space. 27Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p.1) 28 Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p.89) 29Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. (OJ L 157, 15.6.2016, p.1) 30 Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union. (OJ L 303, 28.11.2018, p. 59) 31Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1101/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 on Community Statistics, and Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom establishing a Committee on the Statistical Programmes of the European Communities. (OJ L 87, 31.03.2009, p. 164) 32Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000, on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce). (OJ L 178, 17.07.2000, p. 1) 33Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. (OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10) 34 Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 92) 35Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004). 36Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. (OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, p. 56). 37 Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC (OJ L 151, 14.6.2018). 38 Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport. (OJ L 207, 6.8.2010, p. 1)
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) It highlights the importance of processing the personal data of EU citizens in the European Union if at all possible.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) The development of a European industrial and technological base calls for the introduction of a European preference for local or European production in public procurement of digital data in the European Union.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Some personal data, such as health or children’s data, are by their very nature unique. The anonymisation of such data should be guaranteed and storage or analysis thereof outside the European Union should not be authorised.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 b (new)
(15b) A third country which has not penalised a significant security lapse on the part of a firm processing personal or protected data of European origin will be deemed not to offer appropriate safeguards.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 c (new)
(15c) Third countries engaging in economic espionage against EU companies cannot be deemed to offer appropriate safeguards regarding the processing by their companies of protected data of European origin.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) To ensure the proper enforcement of such obligations, the re-user located in a third country or another Member State should also authorise any inspection deemed necessary by the public-sector body which authorised re-use.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 b (new)
(16b) A Member State should be able to require cloud providers and digital undertakings operating in the European Union, whether located in the European Union or in a third country, to grant access to any relevant personal data linked to terrorism, even if they are stored in a third country.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
(5) Fees shall be derived from the costs related to the production of the data, to the processing of requests for re- use of the categories of data referred to in Article 3 (1) and a percentage of the profits generated through the commercial re-use of the data. The methodology for calculating fees shall be published in advance.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5a) The Member State may use the cost of producing the data to establish a fair fee to offset the initial or recurrent public investment. The European Union shall use the fees to cover the sums it has invested to produce these data.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 b (new)
(5b) In making the calculation, the Member State may take account of the way the data are used and the company’s tax contribution in order to reduce the fee.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point h a (new)
(ha) the place of data processing and the number of jobs to be created in the European Union;
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 297 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point h b (new)
(hb) the turnover and taxes paid in the Member State in the previous year, except in the case of an SME.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
(aa) impose a state compensation obligation on the entity re-using the data in the event of a breach of data anonymity.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 319 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) exclude the provider from access to new public data in that Member State for a specified period of time.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) report annually the percentage of data shared in accordance with this Regulation which are processed inside and outside the European Union; report on job creation in the data-processing sector by Member State.
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 387 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
(3) Where a public sector body, a natural or legal person to which the right to re-use data was granted under Chapter 2, a data sharing provider or entity entered in the register of recognised data altruism organisations is the addressee of a decision of a court or of an administrative authority of a third country to transfer from or give access to non- personal data held in the Union and compliance with such a decision would risk putting the addressee in conflict with Union law or with the law of the relevant Member State, transfer to or access to such data by that third-country authority shall take place only: (a) requires the reasons and proportionality of the decision to be set out, and it requires the court order or the decision, as the case may be, to be specific in character, for instance by establishing a sufficient link to certain suspected persons, or infringements; (b) addressee is subject to a review by a competent court in the third-country; and (c) court issuing the order or reviewing the decision of an administrative authority is empowered under the law of that country to take duly into account the relevant legal interests of the provider of the data protected by Union law or the applicable Member State law. The addressee of the decision shall ask the opinion of the relevant competent bodies or authorities, pursuant to this Regulation, in order to determine if these conditions are met.deleted where the third-country system the reasoned objection of the in that context, the competent
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2020/0340(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) where the third-country system requires the reasons and proportionality of the decision to be set out, and it requires the court order or the decision, as the case may be, to be specific in character, for instance by establishing a sufficient link to certain suspected persons, or and their criminal infringements;
2021/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Public health falls, as a matter of principle under the responsibility of the Member States, which are free to organise and deliver their health-care services in whatever manner they wish, as well as to procure medical devices, medicines, vaccines and health products, and to devise policies for cooperation and sharing of best practice, information and medical equipment, however they see fit.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In light of the lessons learnt during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, such as systemic weaknesses in the supply chain of certain medical devices and medicines in Europe, in particular dependence on China and India, and in order to facilitate adequate Union-wide preparedness and response to all cross- border threats to health, the legal framework for epidemiological surveillance, monitoring, early warning of, and combating serious cross-border threats to health, as set out in Decision No 1082/2013/EU, needs to be broadened with regard to additional reporting requirements and analysis on health systems indicators, and cooperation by Member States with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Moreover, in order to ensure effective Union response to novel cross- border threats to health, the legal framework to combat serious cross-border threats to health should enable to immediately adopt case definitions for the surveillance of novel threats and should provide for the establishment of a network of EU reference laboratories and a network to support monitoring of disease outbreaks that are relevant to substances of human origin. The capacity for contact tracing should be strengthened via the creation of an automated system, using modern technologies.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The protection of human health is a matter which has a cross-cutting dimension and is relevant to numerous Union policies and activities. In order to achieve a high level of human health protection, and to avoid any overlap of activities, duplication or conflicting actions, the Commission, in liaison with the Member States and in full compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, should ensure coordination and exchange of information between the mechanisms and structures established under this Regulation, and other mechanisms and structures established at Union level and under the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the Euratom Treaty), the activities of which are relevant to the preparedness and response planning, monitoring, early warning of, and combating serious cross-border threats to health. In particular, the Commission should ensure that relevant information from the various rapid alert and information systems at Union level and under the Euratom Treaty is gathered and communicated to the Member States through the Early Warning and Response System (‘EWRS’) set up by Decision No 2119/98/EC.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) This regulation should draw on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic to assess whether an EU coordination mandate is needed, particularly in view of the difficulties encountered in the European Commission’s negotiation of contracts for centralised procurement of vaccines as when as during their delivery. Such lessons should lead to the incorporation into negotiating mandates of provisions on negotiators’ qualifications, terms and conditions and deadlines for delivery, as well as the benefits or sanctions applicable in the event of diligence or default.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The recognition of public health emergency situations and the legal effects of this recognition provided by Decision No 1082/2013/EU should be broadened. To this end, this Regulation should allow for the Commission to formally recognise a public health emergency at Union level. In order to recognise such an emergency situation, the Commission should establish an independent advisory committee that will provide expertise on whether a threat constitutes a public health emergency at Union level, and advise on public health response measures and on the termination of this emergency recognition. The advisory committee should consist of independent experts, selected by the Commission from the fields of expertise and experience most relevant to the specific threat that is occurring, representatives of the ECDC, of the EMA, and of other Union bodies or agencies as observers. Recognition of a public health emergency at Union level will provide the basis for introducing operational public health measures for medical products and medical devices, flexible mechanisms to develop, procure, manage and deploy medical countermeasures as well as the activation of support from the ECDC to mobilise and deploy outbreak assistance teams, known as ‘EU Health Task Force’. In accordance with the limits set by the Treaties, none of these mechanisms should be binding on Member States, but they should make it easier for the Union and the Member States to coordinate and adopt measures at the European level.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall present an action plan addressing the proposed recommendations of the audit and the corresponding corrective actions and milestones. These actions may, in particular, include: (a) legislation, if necessary; (b) (c) overview reports of audits series, which present cases of good practice.deleted review/adjustment of the training initiatives;
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) enable the automated collection of surveillance and laboratory data, make use of information from electronic health records, with the consent of the patients concerned and in strict compliance with personal data protection rules, as well as media monitoring, media monitoring, and apply artificial intelligence for data validation, analysis and automated reporting;
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) the cases where, and the conditions under which the third countries and international organisations concerned may be granted partial access to the functionalities of the platform and the practical arrangements of such access;deleted
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2020/0322(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. It shall have no effect on the activation and functioning of health emergency arrangements under Member States’ legislation, where they exist.
2021/04/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The exchanges of digital information through EU CSW-CERTEX should cover Union non-customs formalities laid down in Union legislation that customs authorities are entrusted to enforce. Those formalities impose different obligations for the import, export or transit of certain goods, and their verification through customs controls is fundamentally important to the effective functioning of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs. EU CSW-CERTEX should cover digitalised regulatory formalities laid down in Union legislation and managed by partner competent authorities in electronic Union non-customs systems, storing the relevant information from all Member States required for goods clearance. It is therefore appropriate to identify the Union non-customs formalities which should be subject to digital cooperation through EU CSW-CERTEX. In particular, EU CSW- CERTEX should initially cover sanitary and phytosanitary requirements, rules regulating the import of organic products, environmental requirements in relation to fluorinated greenhouse gases and ozone depleting substances, and formalities related to the import of cultural goods. EU CSW-CERTEX should integrate other non-customs formalities as soon as the appropriate technical and functional specifications are in place.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Any processing of personal data in EU CSW-CERTEX shall be conducted in an appropriately safe and secure environment with a view to preventing unauthorised disclosure and alteration. To that end, suitable organisational and technical cybersecurity measures should be adopted, including and deploying in particular encryption measures. Furthermore, any processing of personal data should facilitate information sharing between the national environments for customs and Union non- customs systems without any storing of data. It should also transform data, where necessary and taking into account the need to respect confidentiality, to enable information exchange between both digital domains. The information technology facilities used for data transformation should be located in the Union.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The processing of personal data within the framework of this Regulation by competent authorities should comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The processing of personal data by the Commission within the framework of this Regulation should comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The increased digitalisation of customs and Union non-customs regulatory formalities applicable to international trade has opened up new opportunities for Member States to improve the digital cooperation between customs and partner competent authorities. In pursuit of those priorities, several Member States have started to develop frameworks for national single window environments for customs. Those initiatives differ substantially depending on the level of existing customs information technology architecture, priorities and cost structures. It is therefore necessary to require Member States to establish and operate national single window environments for customs for Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX. Those environments should constitute the national components of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs, enabling safe and secure electronic information sharing and collaboration between customs, partner competent authorities and economic operators to ensure compliance with and efficient enforcement of customs legislation and Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX. In lineorder to realise an effective and uniform application of this Regulation, the Commission shall provide guidance concerning common technical and functional specifications for the integration of the relevant non-customs formalities within thise national single window environments for customs. As a result, national single windows should also be interoperable between each other in order to cater for the validation of formalities which, although issued by national administrations, are valid throughout the Union. . In line with these objectives, the national single window environments for customs should enable the automated verification by customs authorities of formalities in respect of which data is transmitted from the respective Union non-customs system through EU CSW-CERTEX. The national single window environments for customs should also allow partner competent authorities to monitor and control the quantities of authorised goods (‘quantity management’) that have been released by customs through the Union. This should be ensured by providing the necessary clearance information to the Union non- customs systems through EU CSW- CERTEX. In practical terms, quantity management at Union level is necessary to enable a better enforcement of non- customs regulatory formalities by automatically and consistently monitoring the consumption of authorised quantities for the release of goods, avoiding their overuse or mishandling.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To further simplify goods clearance processes for economic operators and to reduce administrative burdens, the national single window environments for customs should become a single channel to communicate with customs and partner competent authorities. Adequate support and information on the processes and technical requirements related to the use of such single channel should be provided to economic operators via easily accessible and user-friendly national websites. The Union non- customs formalities subject to this additional facilitation measure are a subset of the overarching formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX. The Commission should identify those formalities progressively by assessing the fulfilment of a set of criteria relevant to trade facilitation, taking into account their legal and technical feasibility. In order to further enhance trade facilitation, it should be possible to use the national single window environments for customs as a platform for coordinating controls between customs authorities and partner competent authorities in line with Article 47(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The Commission should regularly monitor the functioning of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs to evaluate the performance of EU CSW- CERTEX and to ensure the efficient enforcement of Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX, in particular with the view to integrate other non-customs formalities. The Commission should submit regular assessment reports on the functioning of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs to the European Parliament and to the Council. Those reports should take stock of progress, identify areas for improvement and propose recommendations for the future in light of progress made towards an improved digital collaboration between customs and partner competent authorities involved in goods clearance to ensure simplified processes for economic operators and the efficient enforcement of Union non-customs formalities.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Processing of personal data shall be conducted in a safe and secure environment by means of appropriate organizational and technical cybersecurity measures. Processing of personal data may take place in EU CSW- CERTEX only for the following purposes:
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Member States shall establish national single window environments for customs. Each Member State shall be responsible for the development, integration and operation of its single window environment for customs, including the safeguard of security and integrity of network and information systems in place. Member States shall ensure interoperability with EU CSW- CERTEX as well as with other national single window environments.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where Member States have national single windows frameworks already in place, they shall bear responsibility for integrating and managing the appropriate interfaces with EU CSW-CERTEX.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The national single window environments for customs shall enable the interoperable and secure exchange of information and cooperation by electronic means between customs authorities, partner competent authorities and economic operators for the purposes of compliance with and efficient enforcement of customs legislation and the Union non- customs formalities listed in the Annex.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) provide a single communication channel for economic operators to lodge standardized information to fulfil the relevant customs formalities and Union non-customs formalities subject to additional digital cooperation in accordance with Article 12.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The processing of personal data within the national single window environments for customs shall take place in a safe and secure manner by means of appropriate organizational and technical cybersecurity measures, as well as in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 separately from the processing operations referred to in Article 6 of this Regulation.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For each of the Union non-customs formalities listed in the Annex, EU CSW- CERTEX shall enable information to be exchanged in a secure and interoperable manner between the national single window environments for customs and the relevant Union non-customs systems for the following purposes:
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) allowing economic operators to submit the relevantrough a single point of entry the relevant standardized information required for the fulfilment of the applicable customs formalities and Union non-customs formalities;
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 8(3), point (c), Article 11, Article 13(1), (2) and (3), Article 14 and Article 15(1) and (2) shall apply from 1 January 203129.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the 2016 Commission evaluation concluded that the objectives of the Defence Procurement Directive had only been achieved partially, since it allowed for an initial increase in competition, transparency and non- discrimination in the EU’s defence procurement market, but much more progress in Member States’ consistent use of the directive was needed to fully achieve those objectives fullyshowing a preference for local or European manufacturing in defence procurement;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas following the military stances adopted by Erdoğan recently, Turkey is no longer a reliable ally in the fields of defence and security like other NATO members;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas there is a need to protect and strengthen European subcontractors and manufacturers of critical components or systems in light of the predatory approach of third country undertakings;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 21 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls in particular that the development of a European defence technological and industrial base requires the establishment of a European preference for local or European production in defence procurement in Europe;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that too many Member States source mainly from third countries to meet their defence needs;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that when a contracting authority authorises economic operators from countries outside the European Union or the European Economic Area to participate in a procedure for the award of defence or security contracts, this authorisation must take into account, inter alia, the requirements of security of information and supply, the safeguarding of defence and state security interests, the interest in developing the European defence technological and industrial base and the requirements of reciprocity;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Deplores the use of G2G exclusions to allow for FMS acquisitions on a very large scale from third country partners and the distortions of competition suffered by European actors;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that there is still a strong need to focus on the effective implementation of the Defence Procurement Directive, considers that, for that to happen, the Member States should focus on ensuring equal treatment of suppliers of hardware manufactured in Europe, transparency and competition and that the Commission should focus on providing the Member States with further guidelines on the application of the provisions laid down in the directive;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need for coherence between the implementation of Directive 2009/81 and the European Defence Fund; as such, calls for tenders financed by ‘European’ funds should be reserved for European solutions;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 40 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Considers that the Commission should clarify the conditions for the application of the government-to- government exclusion in order to avoid anti-competitive practices organised by third countries, such as foreign military sales (FMS), which lead to unfair competition and seriously hamper the capabilities of Member States’ companies; calls also for the guidance note on ‘government-to-government’ exclusion to cover new forms of procurement such as the Global-FMS concept;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls for greater transparency on the advantages offered by the direct and indirect compensation negotiated by third countries in the European Union;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls that the export of defence- related products, both within the Union and to non-EU countries, must remain at the sole discretion of the Member States.
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls the strategic nature of supply chain security and reaffirms the importance of provisions concerning subcontracting aimed at dramatically limiting the risks associated with supply chains being open or interrupted;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that better implementation of the directives is critical in order to attain the overarching objective of improving the functioning of the internal market for defence products and of contributing to the establishment of an open EDEM; prioritising European or locally produced hardware;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2019/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Recalls the need to strengthen Member States’ strategic autonomy and technological sovereignty by reducing technological and industrial dependencies and by better controlling foreign subsidies and foreign direct investment in Europe, in order to protect critical European companies against attempts by third countries to control them;
2020/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that due to the COVID-19 crisis, it is of paramount importance for the protection of EU citizens that the safety of all products needed to tackle the emergency is the highest, especially for medical and protective equipment, including and in particular products from outside the EU; calls, therefore, on the Commission and Member States to strengthen their coordinated actions within the product safety framework;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out the need to adapt product safety rules to the digital world; asks the Commission to address the challenges of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the internet of things (IoT) and robotics in its revision of the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD), and to identify and close gaps within existing legislation such as the Machinery Directive and Radio Equipment Directive, whileensuring coherence among all the different initiatives and avoiding duplicating legislation;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages the Commission to develop measures, such as risk-based assessment schemes and conformity assessment mechanisms, where they do not yet exist, to ensure the safety and security of products with embedded emerging technologies, and to provide support to micro and SMEs to reduce the burden such measures can create;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Asks the Commission and the Member States to take account of the autonomous self-learning behaviour of AI throughout a product’s lifetime; calls for human oversight and effective checks on high-risk AI products to ensure trust and product safety;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages economic operatomerging technologies' providers to integrate safety mechanisms in emerging technologies, including self-repair mechanisms, to prevent the upload of unsafe software, raise awareness of safety problems of their products, and ensure safety throughout their lifecycle;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance connectivity infrastructure, including 5G, in order to improve the safety of connected products while keeping citizens' health as the greater good;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to speed up its efforts to develop a European cybersecurity certification schemes for AI, IoT and robotics products, and to assess whether to create mandatory certification schemes for specific consumer products that can be quickly updated to adapt to current risks without hindering innovation;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages Member States to increase the resources and expertise of their market surveillance authorities, to enhance cooperation among them, including particular at cross-border level, improve the efficiency and effectiveness of checks, especially where freight traffic is high such as in ports, and properly staff custom authorities so as to be able to identify unsafe products, in particular from third countries, track their origin and prevent and stop their circulation in the internal market;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that products directly purchased by consumers from non-EU economic operators must be subject to effective controls on their quality, origin and compliance to the EU regulatory framework; calls on market surveillance authorities to undertake adequate checks on these products and to keep the ICSMS system updated;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Commission to improve and increase, at European and international level, cooperation between consumer protection, market surveillance and customs authorities so as to enable the swift transfer of information on unsafe products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 244 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Asks the Commission to evaluate the necessity of requiring online platforms to put in place effective and appropriate safeguards to tackle the appearance of advertisements for unsafe products and to block misleading advertisements of these products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 248 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls on Member States to improve the connection and interaction between existing national and European public databases of illegal and unsafe products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 261 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Emphasises that traceability along the supply chain is key to improving the safety and quality of products, since clear and reliable information on products empowers consumers, including persons with disabilities, to make informed choices, and allows market surveillance authorities to carry out their activities; asks the Commission to update the rules for the traceability requirements of non- harmonised products accordingly;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 264 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Stresses that the lack of EU mandatory rules on origin labelling of products and their main components generates uncertainty to consumers who are often misled by the packaging itself; points out that an EU effective and binding traceability system would ensure a higher level of consumer safety for all products placed on the EU market;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2019/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls on the Commission to include in the State Aid refit work the necessary Guidelines that concern all the sectors which shall be directly impacted by the European Green Deal, such as, for instance, the maritime and river transport one;
2020/01/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital -1 (new)
(-1) Whereas foreign companies have nearly tripled their public procurement contracts in Europe in 5 years, and whereas, according to the Commission's figures, non-European companies were awarded public contracts in the European Union worth 32 billion in 2017 compared with 10-17 billion in 2021; whereas the Commission admits that it has no information on the biggest procurement contracts awarded to European companies in the US and China.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Many third countries are reluctant or refuse to open their public procurement and their concessions markets to international competition, or to open those markets further than what they have already done. As a result, Union economic operators face restrictive procurement practices in many of the trading partner of the Union. Those restrictive procurement practices result in the loss of substantial trading opportunities. In this context, the introduction of measures aimed at encouraging the opening of third countries' public procurement markets and at achieving mutual reciprocity is a necessary stage in defending the commercial interests of the Member States and the Union. However, if the measures were to prove insufficient and European companies continued to encounter problems accessing the public procurement and concessions markets of third countries, the Commission and the Member States should investigate introducing more effective trade defence instruments without delay.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) While many third countries persist in limiting access to their public procurement markets, large sections of the Union's public procurement markets remain open to international competition. Union companies operating in the internal market are thus confronted by unfair competition from economic operators based outside the Union, particularly where the latter receive government subsidies.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) Alongside the application of reciprocity in international public procurement markets by means of this Regulation, which is a good first stage, the Commission and the Member States are urged to investigate the level of interest in implementing a 'Buy European' act.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In view of the fact that the access of third country goods and services to the public procurement market of the Union falls within the scope of the common commercial policy, Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities should not be able tomay, in keeping with the spirit of this Regulation, restrict the access of third country goods or services to their tendering procedures by any other measure than those provided for in this Regulationin order to ensure that foreign economic operators respect environmental, social and labour laws and all applicable national laws.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) If the existence of a restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measure or practice in a third country is confirmed, the Commission should invite the country concerned to enter into consultations with a view to improving the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services in respect of public procurement in that country. In order to encourage the country concerned promptly to take an active part in this dialogue, the Commission should decide, when the consultation procedure starts, to introduce on a temporary basis some measures set out in this Regulation, namely exclusion from participation in tendering procedures in EU public procurement markets or from price adjustment measures. The measures would apply to tenders from economic operators originating in that country and/or which deal with products and services originating in that country.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) If the consultations with the country concerned do not lead to sufficient improvements to the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services within a reasonable timeframe, the Commission should be able to adopt, where appropriate, price adjustment measure applying to tenders submitted by economic operators originating in that country and/or including goods and services originating in that countryprolong the measures introduced at the start of the consultation procedure and where necessary to adopt additional measures contained in this Regulation.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 79 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Price adjustment measures should not have a negative impact on on-going trade negotiations with the country concerned. Therefore, where a country is engaging in substantive negotiations with the Union concerning market access in the field of public procurement, the Commission may suspend the measures during the negotiations.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) It is imperative that contracting authorities and contracting entities have access to a range of high-quality products meeting their purchasing requirements at a competitive price while remaining aware of the need to guarantee the long-term economic and social interests of the Member States and European citizens and consumers. Therefore contracting authorities and contracting entities should be able not to apply price adjustment measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services in case there are no Union and/or covered goods or services available which meet the requirements of the contracting authority or contracting entity to safeguard essential public needs, for example in the fields of health and public safety, or where the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation establishes measures intended to improve the access of Union economic operators, goods and services to the public procurement and concessions markets of third countries and to guarantee equal conditions of competition in the internal market. It lays down procedures for the Commission to undertake investigations into alleged restrictive and discriminatory procurement measures or practices adopted or maintained by third countries against Union economic operators, goods and services, and to enter into consultations with the third countries concerned.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It provides for the possibility of applying price adjustment measures to certain tenders for contracts for the execution of works or a work, for the supply of goods and/or the provision of services and for concessions, and measures aimed at excluding access to EU public procurement markets, on the basis of the origin of the economic operators, goods or services concerned. .
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where it is found as a result of an investigation that restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices have been adopted or maintained by a third country and the Commission considers it to be in the Union interest, the Commission shall invite the country in question to enter into consultations. Those consultations shall aim at ensuring that Union economic operators, goods and services can participate in tendering procedures for the award of public procurement or concession contracts in that country on conditions no less favourable than those accorded to national economic operators, goods and services of that country and also with a view to ensuring the application of the principles of transparency and equal treatment. In order to encourage the country concerned promptly to take an active part in this dialogue, the Commission should decide, when the consultation procedure starts, to introduce on a temporary basis some measures set out in this Regulation, namely exclusion from participation in tendering procedures in EU public procurement markets or from price adjustment measures. The measures would apply to tenders from economic operators which originate in that country and/or which deal with products and services originating in that country.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. In the event that consultations with a third country do not lead to satisfactory results within 15 months from the day those consultations started, the Commission shall terminate the consultations and shall take appropriate action. In particular, the Commission may decide, by means of an implementing act, to impose or extend the exclusion of companies from the country concerned that are participating in tendering procedures for the award of EU public procurement contracts or to impose a price adjustment measure, pursuant to Article 8. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – title
PMeasures seeking exclusion from EU public procurement markets and price adjustment measures
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where it emerges, in the course of an investigation under Article 6 and after following the procedure specified in Article 7, that restrictive public procurement measures adopted or maintained by that third country are resulting in a substantial lack of reciprocity regarding market access between the Union and that third country, the Commission may adopt implementing acts in order to extend the exclusion of undertakings from the country concerned that are participating in tendering procedures for the award of EU public procurement contracts and/or adopt price adjustment measures. Tenders more than 50 % of the total value of which is made of goods and/or services originating in a third country, may be subject to a price adjustmentsuch measures where the third country concerned adopts or maintains restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 133 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Price adjustmentThese measures shall only apply to contracts with an estimated value equal to or above EUR 5.000.000 exclusive of value-added tax.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Withdrawal or suspension of procurement market exclusion or price adjustment measures
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may decide, by implementing act, to withdraw the procurement market exclusion or price adjustment measure or suspend its application for a period of time if the country concerned takes satisfactory remedial or corrective actions.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the remedial or corrective actions taken by the third country concerned are rescinded, suspended or improperly implemented, the Commission may reinstate the application of the procurement market exclusion and/or price adjustment measure, at any time, by means of an implementing act.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the remedial or corrective actions taken by the third country concerned are rescinded, suspended or improperly implemented, the Commission may reinstate the application of the price adjustment or procurement market exclusion measure, at any time, by means of an implementing act.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 155 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Application of procurement market exclusion or price adjustment measures
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities on the list adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall apply price adjustmentrestrictive measures to the following:
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where a price adjustment measure is applied, contracting authorities and contracting entities shall require tenderers to provide information on the origin of the goods and/or services contained in the tender, and on the value of the goods and services originating in the third country concerned as a percentage of the total value of the tender. They shall accept self- declarations from tenderers.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities may decide not to apply the procurement market exclusion or price adjustment measure with respect to a procurement or a concession procedure if:
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 (new)
- this is justified for overriding reasons of public interest.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 175 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Where a contracting authority or contracting entity intends not to apply a price adjustmentrestrictive measure , it shall indicate its intention in the contract notice that it publishes pursuant to Article 49 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 69 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession notice pursuant to Article 31 of Directive 2014/23/EU. It shall notify the Commission no later than ten calendar days after the publication of the contract notice.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
In the event that a contracting authority or contracting entity conducts a negotiated procedure without prior publication, under Article 2 of Directive 2014/24/EU or under Article 50 of Directive 2014/25/EU and decides not to apply a price adjustmentrestrictive measure , it shall indicate this in the contract award notice it publishes pursuant to Article 50 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 70 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession award notice it publishes pursuant to Article 32 of Directive 2014/23/EU and notify the Commission no later than ten calendar days after the publication of the contract award notice.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall collect and publish annually information on the 10 largest contracts awarded to European companies in third countries; The Commission shall collect and publish annually information on the 10 largest public procurement contracts awarded to third-country companies in the internal market.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO