Activities of Artur ZASADA

2013/0105(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11

Directive 96/53/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 2

After the expiry of a period of two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States shall measure the weight of vehicles or combination of vehicles in circulation. The purpose of these pre-selection measures is to identify vehicles that are likely to have committed an offence and that should be checked manually. These measures may be taken with the aid of automatic systems set up on the infrastructure, or onboard systems installed in vehicles in line with paragraph 6 below. The automatic systems must enable the identification of the vehicles suspected of exceeding the maximum authorised weights. ~~As these automatic systems are only to be used for pre- selection purposes, and not to define an offence, they do not have to be certified by the Member States.~~

2013/12/10
Committee: TRAN

2013/0105(COD)

The compensation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be paid in cash, by electronic ~~bank~~ transfer, or bank orders ~~or bank cheques~~into the account indicated by the authorised passenger.

2013/10/09
Committee: TRAN

2013/0072(COD)

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a

Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 3 – point 2

»(2) ‘infrastructure manager’ means any body or firm ensuring, in particular, the development, operation and maintenance of railway infrastructure on a network; development includes network planning, financial and investment planning as well as building and upgrades of the infrastructure; operation of the infrastructure includes all elements of the process of train path allocation, including both the definition and the assessment of availability and the allocation of individual paths, traffic management and infrastructure charging, including determination and collection of the charges; maintenance includes infrastructure renewals and the other asset management activities’;

2013/09/26
Committee: TRAN

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point b

~~b) Point 5 is~~ deleted;

2013/09/26
Committee: TRAN

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point c – indent 3a (new)

Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 3 – point 31 – indent 3 a (new)

or - an undertaking consisting of distinct divisions, including an infrastructure manager and one or several divisions providing transport services that do not necessarily have distinct legal personalities;

2013/09/26
Committee: TRAN

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2

~~2) In Article 6, paragraph 2 is~~ deleted;

2013/09/26
Committee: TRAN

2013/0029(COD)

Artur ZASADA, Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ, Roberts ZĪLE, Bogusław LIBERADZKI, Werner KUHN, Jaromír KOHLÍČEK

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3

~~3. [...]~~deleted

2013/09/26
Committee: TRAN

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4

Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 7 c – paragraph 5

5. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 to 4, the on-going compliance with the requirements set out in Articles 7a and 7b shall be monitored by the regulatory body referred to in Article 55. Any applicant shall have the right to appeal to the regulatory body if it believes that these requirements are not complied with. Upon such an appeal, the regulatory body shall decide, within the time-limits indicated in Article 56(9), on all the necessary measures to remedy the situation.deleted

2013/09/23
Committee: TRAN

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) networks that are functionally separate from the rest of the railway system and intended only for the operation of regional, local, urban or suburban ~~passenger~~ services, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these networks;

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)

(ba) Organizationally and technically separate railway lines using a track gauge different than the one dominant in the given Member State, having direct access to the railway infrastructure of countries outside the EU, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these lines;

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1

1. Member States and the Agency each for their own missions shall ensure that railway safety is ~~generally~~ maintained and, where reasonably practicable, continuously improved, taking into consideration the development of Union legislation and technical and scientific progress and giving priority to the prevention of serious accidents.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Member States shall ensure that measures to develop and improve railway safety take account of the need for a system based approach. The main actors of the railway system shall bear the responsibility for the safety of the system, each for their own duties, without prejudice to civil liability in accordance with the legal requirements of the Member States.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c

(c) to establish practical implementation and application of safety management systems in accordance with this Directive.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)

(ca) the keepers and carriers not being railway undertakings including subcontractors

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c b (new)

(cb) consignees and the unloaders

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

When drafting the recommaendations, the Agency shall take account of the opinion of the users, national safety authorities and of the stakeholders. The recommendations shall enclose a report on the results of this consultation and a report assessing the impact of the new CSM to be adopted.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3

3. The single safety certificate shall specify the type and extent of the railway operations covered. It shall be valid throughout the Union for equivalent operations. The safety certificate may also include sidings owned by the railway undertaking if they were included in its safety management system.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)

6a. The holder of a single safety certificate whose certificate has been revoked, either by the Agency or by the National Safety Agency, has the right to appeal, in the same way as it is indicated in art. 10 (3).

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – subparagraph 1

authorisation confirming acceptance of the infrastructure manager's safety management system laid down in Article 9 , which shall include the procedures and provisions for meeting the requirements necessary for the safe design, maintenance and operation of the railway infrastructure, including, where appropriate, the maintenance and operation of the traffic control and signalling system. The safety authorisation may also include sidings owned by the infrastructure manager if they were included in its safety management system.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2

2. The Agency and the national safety authorities shall be free to carry out all inspections, audits and investigations that are needed for accomplishment of their tasks and they shall be granted access to all relevant documents and to premises, installations and equipment of infrastructure managers and railway undertakings.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 2

Until [specific date to be inserted by OPOCE - ~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force], the national safety authorities shall continue to grant safety certificates in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2004/49/EC. Such safety certificates shall be valid until their date of expiry.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 16, 18, 20 and Annex I by [specific date to be inserted by OPOCE - ~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 33 – paragraph 1

Directive 2004/49/EC, as amended by the Directives listed in Annex II, Part A, is repealed with effect from [specific date to be inserted by OPOCE –~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force], without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States concerning the time limits for transposition into national law and application of the Directives set out in Annex II, Part B.

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0016(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 34 – paragraph 2

Articles 10 and 11 shall apply from [specific date to be inserted by OPOCE - ~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force].

2013/09/19
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Artur ZASADA, Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ, Roberts ZĪLE, Bogusław LIBERADZKI, Werner KUHN

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b

(b) networks that are functionally separate from the rest of the rail system and intended only for the operation of regional, local, urban or suburban ~~passenger~~ services, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these networks.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b

(b) networks that are functionally separate from the rest of the railway system and intended only for the operation of regional, local, urban or suburban ~~passenger~~ services, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these networks.;

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Artur ZASADA, Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ, Roberts ZĪLE, Bogusław LIBERADZKI, Werner KUHN

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)

(ba) Organizationally and technically separate railway lines using a track gauge different than the one dominant in the given Member State, having direct access to the railway infrastructure of countries outside the EU, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these lines.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)

(ba) Organizationally and technically separate railway lines using a track gauge different than the one dominant in the given Member State, having direct access to the railway infrastructure of countries outside the EU, as well as railway undertakings operating solely on these lines.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12

(12) ‘upgrading’ means any major modification work on a subsystem or part subsystem of it which results in a change in the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification, if this technical file exists, and which improves the overall performance of the subsystem;

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13

(13) ‘renewal’ means any major substitution work on a subsystem or part of it which does not change the overall performance of the subsystem means any substitution work on a subsystem or part of it which does not change the overall performance of the subsystem;

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19

(19) ‘project at an advanced stage of development’ means any project whose planning/construction stage has reached a point where a change in the technical specifications ~~may compromise the viability of the project as planned; ;~~would be unacceptable to the Member State concerned. Such an impediment may be legal, contractual, economic, financial, social or environmental in nature and must be duly substantiated.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

(ca) for any proposed renewal, extension or upgrading of an existing subsystem, when the application of these TSIs would compromise the economic viability of the project and/or the compatibility of the rail system in that Member State;

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)

(cb) for vehicles coming from or going to third countries the track gauge of which is different from that of the main rail network within the Community

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1

1. Member States ~~and the Agency~~ shall consider as being interoperable and meeting the essential requirements, those interoperability constituents which are covered by the 'EC' declaration of conformity or suitability for use.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3

3. Member States ~~and the Agency~~ shall consider that an interoperability constituent meets the essential requirements if it complies with the conditions laid down by the corresponding TSI or the corresponding European specifications developed to comply with these conditions.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2

2. Member States shall notify the full text of existing national rules to the Agency and the Commission through the appropriate IT system in accordance with article 23 of Regulation (EU) No …/… [Agency Regulation]. Member States shall submit the full text if possible, otherwise at least the reference to the appropriate document.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4

4. If a Member State intends to introduce a new national rule, it shall notify the draft at the initial stage of development to the Agency and the Commission through the appropriate IT system in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No ~~…/…~~.../... [Agency Regulation].

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 5

5. Member States shall ensure that national rules, including those covering the interfaces between vehicles and network, are made available free of charge if possible and in aclear language that can be understood by ~~all~~the parties concerned.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Each national safety authority shall a~~uthorise the placing in service of the~~ct as a one-stop-shop for all fixed installations: energy ~~and~~, infrastructure and trackside control command and signalling subsystems which are located or operated in the territory of its Member State.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

~~The Agency shall grant decisions authorising the placing in service of the trackside control-command and signalling subsystems located or operated throughout the Union~~For trackside ERTMS, the NSA shall consult ERA being the decision making authority. For all other fixed installations the NSA shall be the decision making authority.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3

The Agency and the national safety authorities shall provide detailed guidance on how to obtain the authorisations referred to in the first and second subparagraph. An application guidance document describing and explaining the requirements for those authorisations and listing the required documents shall be made available to applicants free of charge. The Agency and the national safety authorities shall cooperate in disseminating such information.deleted

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 9 a (new)

9 a. The authorisation for vehicles operated or intended to be operated exclusively on a network with track gauge (1.520 mm, 1.524 mm, 1.600 mm) either being different from the main rail network within the Union or on a rail network being geographically fully separated, the vehicle authorisation shall be granted by the national safety authority.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 9 b (new)

9b. Member States may decide not to require any authorisation by the responsible safety authority for vehicles registered in third countries entering the network of Member States the track gauge of which is different from that of the main rail network within the Union. In this case the authorisation in only valid on this network.

2013/10/01
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

1. The Agency shall set up and keep a register of ~~authorisations to place vehicle types on the market issued in accordance with Article 22~~ types of vehicles authorised by the Member States for placing in service. This register shall meet the following criteria:

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 2

2. The Commission shall adopt common specifications relating to content, data format, functional and technical architecture, operating mode and rules for data input and consultation for the register of authoris~~ations to place vehicle types on the market~~ed types of vehicles by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(3).

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 45 – paragraph 2

2. The values of the parameters recorded in the register of infrastructure shall be used in combination with the values of the parameters recorded in the ~~vehicle authorisation for placing on the market~~register of authorised types of vehicles to check the technical compatibility between vehicle and network.

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 51 – paragraph 1

1. Member States may continue to apply the provisions set out in Chapter V of Directive 2008/57/EC until [~~two~~ five years after the date of entry into force].

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 51 – paragraph 1

1. Member States may continue to apply the provisions set out in Chapter V of Directive 2008/57/EC until [~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force].

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 1, Article 2, Article 7(1) to (4), Article 11(1), Article 13, Article 14(1) to (7), Article 15(1) to (6), Articles 17 to 21, Article 22(3) to (7), Articles 23 to 36, Article 37(2), Article 38, Article 39, Articles 41 to 43, Article 45(1) to (5), Article 51, and Annexes I to III by [~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force] at the latest . They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those measures and a correlation table between those measures and this Directive. The correlation tables are needed to enable all actors concerned to clearly identify the relevant provisions applicable at national level for the implementation of this Directive.

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0015(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 1

Directive 2008/57/EC , as amended by the Directives listed in Annex IV, Part A, is repealed with effect from [~~two~~five years after the date of entry into force] , without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limits for the transposition into national law of the Directives set out in Annex IV, Part B .

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – title

Authorisations for placing in service of trackside ~~control-command and signalling~~ERTMS. sub-systems

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2013/0014(COD)

Sławomir NITRAS, Artur ZASADA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1

The Agency ~~shall issue authorisations for placing in service of the trackside control- command and signalling subsystems located or operated in the entire Union~~is the decision making authority for trackside ERTMS in accordance with Article 18 of Directive …... [the Interoperability Directive].

2013/09/20
Committee: TRAN

2012/2297(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)

17a. Notes that plans to shift transport from road to sea could be hampered by the ever greater requirements relating to the scrapping of ships and the sulphur content of marine fuels, which significantly reduces the competitiveness of maritime transport;

2013/05/02
Committee: TRAN

2012/2297(INI)

Sławomir NITRAS, Artur ZASADA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)

20a. Stresses that any maritime transport development strategy should not only take into account the environmental aspect but must also protect the overall interests of shipowners by not worsening their business environment;

2013/05/02
Committee: TRAN

2012/2297(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Calls upon Member States, with the direct involvement of local and regional authorities, to support initiatives to develop and upgrade tourism infrastructure, with particular emphasis on the needs of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility (PRM), and make every effort to eliminate bureaucracy and the lack of transparency in the sector; notes the importance of creating or upgrading specialised high-level schools (administration and economy of tourism enterprises, tourism professions, maritime colleges, cookery schools, etc.);

2013/05/02
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32

(32) ~~It is important to clearly set the line which protects the reporter from prejudice or prosecution by provid~~Without prejudice to the national rules of criminal law and a proper administration of justice, it is important to clearly set the line which protects the person involved in the reported occurrence from prejudice or any kind of punishment from their employer by encouraging aviation professionals to work towards achieving a common understanding of the term gross negligence, in accordance with the 'Just Culture' principles.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

(4) ‘gross negligence’ means a manifest and wilful violation of the duty of care directly causing foreseeable damage to a person or to a property, or which seriously lowers the level of aviation safety;deleted

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7

(7) ‘'Just Culture’' means a culture in which front line operators or others are not punished for actions, omissions or decisions taken by them that are commensurate with their experience and training, but ~~where~~in which gross negligence, wilful violations and destructive acts are not tolerated;

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12

(12) ‘'safety management system (SMS)’' means a systematic approach to managing safety including the necessary organisational structures, accountabilities, policies and procedures; . For the purposes of this regulation, the term includes any management system that, independently or integrated with other management systems of the organisation, addresses the management of safety, provided that it fulfils all the ICAO requirements for such a system.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Any organisation established in a Member State that is not certified or approved by EASA shall report to the competent authority of that Member State, as referred to in Article 6(2), the details of relevant occurrences and other safety related information collected in accordance with paragraph 1. Member States may require any organisation established in their territory to report the details of all occurrences in accordance with paragraph 1.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3

3. Each organisation certified or approved by ~~a Member State shall report, where required, to~~EASA shall report to EASA and the competent authority of the Member State~~, as referred to in Article 6(2), the~~ the first results of the analysis performed in accordance with paragraph 1 and ~~the~~any action~~s required~~ to be taken in accordance with paragraph 2 within 30 days from the day of notification of the occurrence by the reporter. The final result of the analysis must be reported as soon as it is available.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. EASA shall ensure that all personal details such as names or addresses of individual persons are never recorded in the EASA database referred to in Article 6(5a). Such disidentified information shall be made available to all relevant parties notably to allow them to discharge their obligations in terms of aviation safety improvement. EASA shall process personal data only to the extent necessary for the purpose of this Regulation and without prejudice to Directive 95/46/EC.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3

3. Without prejudice to the applicable national rules of criminal law, Member States shall refrain from instituting proceedings in respect of unpremeditated or inadvertent infringements of the law which come to their attention only because they have been reported in application of Articles 4 and 5. ~~This rule shall not apply in cases of gross negligence.~~

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 concerning the Annexes I to this Regulation in order to a~~dapt the Annexes to technical progress, to align the Annexes~~lign it with the international agreed taxonomy ADREP and with ECCAIRS, with other leg~~islation~~al acts adopted by the Union and with international agreements, and to update the ~~list of interested parties and the~~ request for European Central Repository information form~~, and to ensure that the scope of incidents to be reported under the mandatory scheme remains appropriate~~ provided in Annex II.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2

2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 7(6)~~, 8(5), 11(9)~~ and 17 shall be conferred on the Commission for a~~n indeterminate~~ period of five years from the entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than nine months before the end of the five year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of ~~time~~identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension no later than three months before the end of each period.

2013/07/15
Committee: TRAN

2012/0358(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2

2. In the absence of appropriate international standards developed by the IMO for a specific item of marine equipment, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 37, harmonised technical specifications and testing standards for that specific item of marine equipment when it is necessary in order to remove an unacceptable threat to safety or to the environmentmplementing powers shall be conferred upon the Commission in order to adopt harmonised technical specifications and testing standards when, in exceptional circumstances and in order to remove an unacceptable threat to safety or to the environment, it is necessary due to a weakness or anomaly in an existing standard or the absence of an appropriate international standard. Those specifications and standards shall apply on an interim basis and until such time as the IMO has adopted appropriate standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 38(3).

2013/06/05
Committee: TRAN

2012/0358(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2

2. The Commission shall adopt ~~delegated~~implementing acts, in accordance with Article 37, in order to identify the specific items of marine equipment which can benefit from electronic tagging, and to lay down appropriate technical criteria as regards the design, performance, affixing and use of electronic tags.

2013/06/05
Committee: TRAN

2012/0358(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 6

6. Where the ~~national measure is considered justified and the~~ non- compliance of the marine equipment is attributed to shortcomings in the testing standards referred to in Article 4, the Commission may, in order to fulfil the objective of this Directive, confirm, modify or revoke the said measure by means of implementing acts in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 38(2). The Commission shall furthermore be empowered to adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 37,. Implementing powers shall be conferred upon the Commission in order to adopt interim harmonised requirements and testing standards for that specific item of marine equipment in order to remove the threat to safety or to the environment pending the modification of the testing standard concerned by the relevant international organisation and in accordance with the criteria identified in Article 8(2).

2013/06/05
Committee: TRAN

2012/0358(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point a

(a) amend the list of international conventions set out in Article 2(3), in order to include those conventions which require the flag State’s approval of equipment to be placed on board ships flying its flag;deleted

2013/06/05
Committee: TRAN

2012/0358(COD)

Artur ZASADA, Sławomir NITRAS

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point b

(b) update the references to ~~international and European~~ standards, as referred to in Annex III, when new standards become available.

2013/06/05
Committee: TRAN

2012/0344(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a

Regulation (EC) No 994/98
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a – point xii

~~coordination of transport or reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service pursuant to Article 93 of the Treaty;~~deleted

2013/04/25
Committee: TRAN

2012/0344(NLE)

Artur ZASADA, Sławomir NITRAS

Artur ZASADA, Andrzej GRZYB

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – subpoint b Directive 2009/28/EC

(b) in paragraph 1, the following second subparagraph is added: ‘For the purpose of compliance with target referred to in the first subparagraph, the maximum joint contribution from biofuels and bioliquids produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops shall be no more than the energy quantity corresponding to the maximum contribution as set out in Article 3(4)d.’deleted

2013/05/23
Committee: TRAN

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13

(13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund ~~under the Connecting Europe Facility~~respecting national allocations for the projects listed in the Annex of this Regulation. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.

2012/09/20
Committee: REGI

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a

(a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent ~~in line with this Regulation in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund~~for projects listed in the Annex to this Regulation, respecting the national allocations;

2012/09/20
Committee: REGI

2011/0302(COD)