BETA

Activities of Thomas HÄNDEL

Plenary speeches (38)

Minimum income schemes in the EU (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Social dumping in the EU (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Tackling inequalities in order to boost inclusive and sustainable economic growth in the EU (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Economic growth and youth employment (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Economic growth and youth employment (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Posting of workers (debate) DE
2016/11/22
What is a 'social triple-A' rating? (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3024(RSP)
Negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2233(INI)
Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2820(RSP)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0160(COD)
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combating unemployment - Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century - Precarious employment (debate) DE
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Freedom of movement for workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0124(COD)
Deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system - Deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0166(COD)
Recognition of professional qualifications and administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0435(COD)
Cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel) (vote)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Public finances in EMU - 2011 and 2012 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2274(INI)
Information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2061(INL)
EU growth (debate)
2016/11/22
EU growth (debate)
2016/11/22
Towards a job-rich recovery (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2647(RSP)
Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2068(INI)
Short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0251(COD)
ILO Convention supplemented by a recommendation on domestic workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Governance and partnership in the Single Market - Single market for Europeans - Single market for enterprises and growth - Public procurement (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2277(INI)
Respect of national wage and retirement-setting mechanisms (debate)
2016/11/22
Adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2239(INI)
Report on competition policy 2009 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2137(INI)
Improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding - Precarious women workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0193(COD)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0115(NLE)
Specific tasks for the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board - Powers of the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority - European Securities and Markets Authority - Macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishment of a European Systemic Risk Board - European Banking Authority - European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority - Cross-Border Crisis Management in the Banking Sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0161(COD)
The organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0195(COD)
G20 labour and employment ministers meeting (Washington, 20/21 April) (debate)
2016/11/22
European Microfinance Facility for Employment and Social Inclusion (Progress) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0096(COD)
Restructuring of the European car industry, in particular the Opel case (debate)
2016/11/22

Reports (1)

REPORT on cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue PDF (198 KB) DOC (105 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(105 KB)

Shadow reports (26)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Long-term Investment Funds PDF (403 KB) DOC (224 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/0214(COD)
Documents: PDF(403 KB) DOC(224 KB)
REPORT on consumer protection – protection of consumers in utilities services PDF (167 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2013/2153(INI)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(80 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws PDF (145 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2012/0127(NLE)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(61 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council PDF (768 KB) DOC (494 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/0253(COD)
Documents: PDF(768 KB) DOC(494 KB)
REPORT on effective labour inspections as a strategy to improve working conditions in Europe PDF (226 KB) DOC (115 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/2112(INI)
Documents: PDF(226 KB) DOC(115 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers PDF (358 KB) DOC (515 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/0124(COD)
Documents: PDF(358 KB) DOC(515 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for investment products PDF (710 KB) DOC (612 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2012/0169(COD)
Documents: PDF(710 KB) DOC(612 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on simplifying the transfer of motor vehicles registered in another Member State within the Single Market PDF (416 KB) DOC (772 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/0082(COD)
Documents: PDF(416 KB) DOC(772 KB)
REPORT on the Internal Market for Services: State of Play and Next Steps PDF (196 KB) DOC (114 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/2144(INI)
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(114 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services PDF (697 KB) DOC (1 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Documents: PDF(697 KB) DOC(1 MB)
REPORT on Fight against Tax Fraud, Tax Evasion and Tax Havens PDF (277 KB) DOC (177 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/2060(INI)
Documents: PDF(277 KB) DOC(177 KB)
REPORT on the Annual Tax Report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth PDF (164 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/2025(INI)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(91 KB)
REPORT on an Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions PDF (353 KB) DOC (250 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2234(INI)
Documents: PDF(353 KB) DOC(250 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European statistics on demography PDF (242 KB) DOC (338 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0440(COD)
Documents: PDF(242 KB) DOC(338 KB)
REPORT proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System PDF (1011 KB) DOC (1 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2011/0435(COD)
Documents: PDF(1011 KB) DOC(1 MB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the award of concession contracts PDF (1 MB) DOC (2 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2011/0437(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(2 MB)
REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring PDF (224 KB) DOC (158 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2061(INL)
Documents: PDF(224 KB) DOC(158 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) PDF (373 KB) DOC (550 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0058(CNS)
Documents: PDF(373 KB) DOC(550 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union PDF (279 KB) DOC (458 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2010/0374(COD)
Documents: PDF(279 KB) DOC(458 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity PDF (666 KB) DOC (949 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0092(CNS)
Documents: PDF(666 KB) DOC(949 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 975/98 of 3 May 1998 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation PDF (140 KB) DOC (176 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0128(NLE)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(176 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the issuance of euro coins PDF (183 KB) DOC (226 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0131(COD)
Documents: PDF(183 KB) DOC(226 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States: Part II of the Europe 2020 Integrated Guidelines PDF (493 KB) DOC (603 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0115(NLE)
Documents: PDF(493 KB) DOC(603 KB)
REPORT Report on developing the job potential of a new sustainable economy PDF (368 KB) DOC (252 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/2010(INI)
Documents: PDF(368 KB) DOC(252 KB)
REPORT Report on atypical contracts, secured professional paths, flexicurity and new forms of social dialogue PDF (211 KB) DOC (128 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2009/2220(INI)
Documents: PDF(211 KB) DOC(128 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Microfinance Facility for Employment and Social Inclusion (Progress Microfinance Facility) PDF (304 KB) DOC (436 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2009/0096(COD)
Documents: PDF(304 KB) DOC(436 KB)

Opinions (6)

OPINION on 2017 Budget-Mandate for the Trilogue
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(124 KB) DOC(204 KB)
OPINION on Recommendations to the European Commission on the negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(196 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Common provisions on the European Funds as regards specific measures for Greece
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(109 KB) DOC(63 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the award of Concession Contracts
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(224 KB) DOC(388 KB)
OPINION Precarious women workers
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(115 KB) DOC(94 KB)
OPINION on the funding and functioning of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(82 KB)

Shadow opinions (38)

OPINION on CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/2062(INI)
Documents: PDF(114 KB) DOC(213 KB)
OPINION on reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/2006(INI)
Documents: PDF(110 KB) DOC(166 KB)
OPINION on Follow-up on the delegation of legislative powers and the control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2323(INI)
Documents: PDF(114 KB) DOC(209 KB)
OPINION on CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2013/2062(INI)
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(352 KB)
OPINION on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/2023(INI)
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(337 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0299(COD)
Documents: PDF(307 KB) DOC(384 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0267(COD)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(282 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the access of third-country goods and services to the Union's internal market in public procurement and procedures supporting negotiations on access of Union goods and services to the public procurement markets of third-countries
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0060(COD)
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(361 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0266(COD)
Documents: PDF(232 KB) DOC(343 KB)
OPINION on implementation of the EU Youth Strategy 2010-2012
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/2073(INI)
Documents: PDF(116 KB) DOC(211 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/0184(COD)
Documents: PDF(328 KB) DOC(506 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for investment products
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/0169(COD)
Documents: PDF(302 KB) DOC(525 KB)
OPINION on reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2013/2006(INI)
Documents: PDF(115 KB) DOC(83 KB)
OPINION on an Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2012/2234(INI)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(122 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0245(COD)
Documents: PDF(201 KB) DOC(362 KB)
OPINION on the Energy Roadmap 2050, a future with energy
2016/11/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/2103(INI)
Documents: PDF(125 KB) DOC(94 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (IMI)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0435(COD)
Documents: PDF(345 KB) DOC(537 KB)
OPINION Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0284(COD)
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(348 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0344(COD)
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(483 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Creative Europe Programme
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0370(COD)
Documents: PDF(215 KB) DOC(540 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on groundhandling services at Union airports and repealing Council Directive 96/67/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0397(COD)
Documents: PDF(250 KB) DOC(561 KB)
OPINION on Education, Training and Europe 2020
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2045(INI)
Documents: PDF(122 KB) DOC(93 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European statistical programme 2013-2017
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0459(COD)
Documents: PDF(203 KB) DOC(504 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Creating a European Account Preservation Order to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0204(COD)
Documents: PDF(222 KB) DOC(561 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0209(COD)
Documents: PDF(237 KB) DOC(564 KB)
OPINION on a corporate governance framework for European companies
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2181(INI)
Documents: PDF(112 KB) DOC(93 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of seasonal employment
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0210(COD)
Documents: PDF(259 KB) DOC(617 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0383(COD)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(430 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2024(INI)
Documents: PDF(117 KB) DOC(101 KB)
OPINION on a 14th company law directive on the cross-border transfer of company seats
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2046(INI)
Documents: PDF(128 KB) DOC(74 KB)
OPINION on modernisation of public procurement
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2048(INI)
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(93 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0306(NLE)
Documents: PDF(226 KB) DOC(593 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0281(COD)
Documents: PDF(245 KB) DOC(597 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a Council directive on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0277(NLE)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(454 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0276(CNS)
Documents: PDF(212 KB) DOC(517 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in the euro area
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0279(COD)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(484 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/0280(COD)
Documents: PDF(286 KB) DOC(666 KB)
OPINION Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions : Reinforcing economic policy coordination
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/2099(INI)
Documents: PDF(117 KB) DOC(74 KB)

Institutional motions (6)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning PDF (190 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2798(RSP)
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the conclusion of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part PDF (304 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2525(RSP)
Documents: PDF(304 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-Turkey relations PDF (266 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2993(RSP)
Documents: PDF(266 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases PDF (177 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2891(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a Council recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market PDF (178 KB) DOC (299 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2820(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(299 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the OLAF Supervisory Committee’s annual report 2014 PDF (139 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2699(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(72 KB)

Oral questions (11)

The EU Youth Guarantee Programme PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(197 KB) DOC(19 KB)
European Qualification Framework for lifelong learning PDF (105 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(16 KB)
European Solidarity Corps PDF (105 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Establishing a Skills Guarantee PDF (7 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2799(RSP)
Documents: PDF(7 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative PDF (106 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Minimum income schemes in the European Union PDF (106 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Tackling inequalities in order to boost inclusive and sustainable economic growth in the EU PDF (105 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(25 KB)
What is a 'social triple-A' rating? PDF (105 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3024(RSP)
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market PDF (105 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2820(RSP)
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Precarious employment PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Precarious employment PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)

Written questions (1)

Interpretation of the list of administrative requirements and control measures pursuant to Article 9 of the Enforcement Directive concerning the Posting of Workers Directive (2014/67/EU) PDF (106 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(18 KB)

Written declarations (1)

Written declaration on working conditions of hotel cleaning staff in the European Union

Amendments (1469)

Amendment 1 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Acknowledges, with regret, the challenges faced by EU mobile phone manufacturers; considers that appropriate support needs to be offered so that the affected workers can retrain so as to be better placed to find jobs in related or expanding industrial sectors;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. NotRecognises that the redundancies are concentrated in the NUTS 2affected regions of Helsinki-Uusimaa (FI1B1), Länsi- Suomi (FI197) and Etelä-Suomi (FI1C1have already experienced extensive lay-offs by firms in the electronics and software sectors and that the latter two regions have high regional unemployment rates (14,6 % and 17,5 % of the labour force respectively); notes that 1 000 out of 1 248 redundant workers eligible for the EGF contribution are expected to participate in the measures;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes that the income support measures will be 26,74 % of the overall package of personalised measures, below the maximum 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation, and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Understands that the EGF-funded training measures will be complementary to those financed by a fund set up by the company to help former employees start small businesses in the IT and other sectors; welcomes this initiative;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up in consultation with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries, social, national and regional partnersWelcomes the consultations with stakeholders including representatives of the Centres for Economic Development (“ELY centres”), the Employment and Economic Development (“TE”) offices of the concerned regions, Microsoft, the Technology Industries of Finland, Trade Union Pro, Union of Professional Engineers in Finland and of the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2098/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. StressNotes that the Finnish authorities have confirmedprovided assurances that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive financial contributionssupport from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that they will be complementary with actions funded by the Structural Funds;
2017/07/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlights, in particular, the very low population density, the problems associated with mountainous terrain and the difficult employment situation in the North of the provinces of León and Palencia; expresses concern about the sharp decline in population, which has been proportionally greatest amongst those under 25;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to duly consider whether there are grounds for taking trade defence measures against certain third country coal producers;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that another 125 NEETs under the age of 30 in the same region are expected to receive personalised services co-financed by the EGFWelcomes Spain’s decision to provide up to 125 NEETs under the age of 30 with personalised services co-financed by the EGF; understands that this will include support to those interested in creating their own business;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the incentives will correspond to 19,53 % of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the maximum 35 % set out in the Regulation; and that those actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that the training courses provided will include workshops on job- search techniques, training in personal and social skills, in information and communication technologies (ICT), and in foreign languages while vocational training will focus on either enhancing mining-related skills that may be relevant to other economic sectors or developing skills for sectors such as: tourism and hospitality in rural areas; environmental restoration of mining basins; reforestation and landscaping;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up in consultation with the social partners, enterprises and the public employmentWelcomes the consultations with stakeholders including trade unions, business associations, the regional agency for economic development, innovation, financing and business internationalization and a public foundation attached to the regional public employment service that took place at the regional level to draw up the co-ordinated package of personalised services;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the inclusion of contributions to the expenses for carers of dependent persons amongst the available incentives in view of the likely positive impact on gender balance; calls on the Commission to present detailed information on the use that is made of this possibility;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2017/2079(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that the Spanish authorities have confirmed that the eligible actions do not receive assistance from other Union financial instruments, and that any double financing will be prevented and that eligible actions will be complementary to actions funded by the structural funds;
2017/06/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2017/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. NoteRecalls that the `Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products` sector has already been the subject of 15 EGF applications, 124 of which based on trade related globaconcerned Nokia companies; notes that the final reports for the 2012 case shows 44% of participants in EGF activities were in employment 2 years after the date of Finland's EGF appliscation and 3 on the global financial and economic crisis; notes that three applications from the 15 were submitted by Finland1; the 2013 case shows 65% in employment; expects the Commission’s mid-term evaluation, due by 30 June 20171a, to include detailed information about the long-term reintegration rate for those receiving EGF assistance, as already called for in its resolution of 15 September 20161b; ________________ 1aArticle 20 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013. 1b European Parliament resolution of 15 September 2016 on activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0361).
2017/04/28
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2017/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the income supports measures will constitute 13,34 % of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the maximum 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation, and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2017/04/28
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2017/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the range of training and counselling services to be provided as well as the support for people seeking employment outside Finland and for start- ups; considers these measures to be particularly appropriate in view of the age profile and skills of the workers concerned;
2017/04/28
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2017/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Emphasises the importance of Nokia Network Systems’ compliance with its legal obligations, including the Directive on informing and consulting employees1a, particularly regarding supplying information to employees, both nationally and at the European level; ________________________ 1aDirective 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29).
2017/04/28
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2017/2033(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the reduction in the 2017 funding request for EGF technical assistance as compared to 2016; considers that it is important to assess such requests as a percentage of the annual amounts that have been used for the EGF in previous years and not only against the maximum that could be spent this year;
2017/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2017/2033(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the procedure to integrate the EGF into SFC2014 has been continuing for several years and the relevant costs for EGF budget have been relatively high; welcomes the reduction in costs compared to previous years, reflecting the fact that the project has now reached the stage of only requiring further fine tuning and adjustments;
2017/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2017/2033(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls the importance of networking and exchange of information on the EGF, so as to spread best practice; supports, therefore, the funding of two meetings of the EGF Expert Group of Contact Persons and two networking seminars on EGF implementation; expects that this exchange of information will also contribute to better and more detailed reporting on the success rate of the applications in the Member States, in particular about the re-employment rate of beneficiaries;
2017/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2017/2033(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Takes note that the Commission intends to invest EUR 70 000 of the available budget under the technical assistance in holding two meetings of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF; takes also note of the intension of the Commission to invest EUR 120 000 in order to promote networking through seminars among Member States, EGF implementing bodies and social partners; reiterwelcomes the Commission’s readiness to invite Members of its EGF Working Group to participates itsn the recent EGF Networking Seminar that took place in Mons; calls on the Commission to continue to invite the Parliament, within reasonable deadlines, to any Expert Group to these meetings and seminars in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission1; _____________ 1. OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.
2017/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2017/2014(BUD)

7. UnderlinEmphasises that both the Drenthe 7. and Overijssel regions have suffered considerably especially from bankruptcies in the retail sector; regrets that the share of employmentail sector accounts for a considerable share of employment (17-19%) in the NUTS 2 level regions Drenthe and Overeijssel; notes that 5 200 retail shops have gone bankrupt since this sector in both provinces is considerable and that, therefore, the loss of jobe start of the crisis with the largest department stores being affected only recently; regrets thas a strong negative effect on the economy of both regions and that the redundancies in the retail sector contributed to that negative development3t this has contributed to an increase of 3 461 in the number of unemployment benefit recipients in those regions’ retail sector between January 2015 and March 2016;
2017/01/31
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2017/2014(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the application does not include any allowances or incentives referred to in point (b) of Article 7(1) of the EGF Regulation; welcomes the decision to limit the costs of technical assistance to 4% of the total costs leaving 96 % to be used for the package of personalised services;
2017/01/31
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2017/2014(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the Netherlands is planning seven different actions, all of which are personalised and targeted services: intake,EGF co-funded personalised services for the redundant workers include assessments of participants’ capabilities, potentials and job perspectives; job search assistance and case management, m; a flexible “Mobility pPool,” for the job seekers and employers with temporary jobs; outplacement assistance,; training and retraining, including entrepreneurship promotion training and, coaching, and entrepreneurship promotion grant; acknowledges the fact there is no allowances and pay-subsidies in that packagegrants;
2017/01/31
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2017/2014(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the Netherlands confirmDutch authorities have provided assurances that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented, that they will be complementary with actions funded by the Structural Funds and that the requirements in national and Union legislation concerning collective redundancies will be complied with;
2017/01/31
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2298(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that the provision of support to former employees of small and medium-sized enterprises also justifies the approval of an application concerning fewer than 500 redundancies;
2016/11/30
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2298(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets the increase in the number of unemployed persons in Sagunto between 2007 (2 778) and 2015 (6 437) and the unemployment rate of 25,8%;
2016/11/30
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2298(BUD)

8a. Welcomes Spain’s decision to offer training measures focused on vocational licensing, such as that required for passenger transport, and on sectors or areas where opportunities exist or will arise, such as the food sector, cooking, occupational risk prevention and quality control and environmental standards, heating, ventilation and air conditioning projects and the maintenance of industrial equipment; endorses the offer of training in skills that contribute to better job performance such as Information and Communications Technology, foreign languages and business management;
2016/11/30
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2298(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges the fact that Spain indicated that the co-ordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up in consultation with the workers representatives,Welcomes the willingness of the representatives of the former workers of Bosal (the enterprise which made redundant a majority of the workers concerned by this application) to support an application for EGF funding and their involvement in designing the measures to be offered to redundant workers; notes that the social partners, the relevant employer's association and the local (Sagunto) authorities were also involved in this process;
2016/11/30
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2298(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the income support measures will be less than 25 % of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the maximum of 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation and that those actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/11/30
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the Commission respected the deadline of 12 weeks from receipt of the completed application from the Estonian authorities, on 6 July 2016, until finalising its assessment on the compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, on 28 September 2016, and notified it to Parliament on the same day;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the impact of the redundancies on theEmphasises that the Ida-Virumaa region is facing considerable challenges due to its localtion and regional economy and employment is expected to be significant duedemographics as it is relatively remote, has a high proportion of Russian speakers living in urban settlements formed around one or two its geopolitproduction plants and has a significalntly remote position at the Russian borderhigher unemployment rate than the national average;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Welcomes Estonia’s decision to combine two economic sectors in one regional application, as the redundancies happened in the same region, as this will reduce the administrative burden and make it possible to organise joint measures for workers made redundant in both sectors;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Estonia is planning 10 different types of actionthe EGF co-funded personalised services for the 800 redundant workers covered by this application, includinclude payment of the cost of formal studies, training cost reimbursement for employers, labour market training, Estonian language courses and related measurestraining, work practice and counselling; takes note that Estonia has provided the required information on actions that are mandatory for the enterprise concerned by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements and has confirmed that a financial contribution from the EGF will not replace such actions;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes the consultations with stakeholders, including trade unions, employers’ association, enterprises and public employment services, that took place at the national and regional level to draw up the co-ordinated package of personalised services;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes that the income support measures will constitute 27,25 % of the overall package of personalised measures, below the maximum 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation; further notes that those actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2235(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Notes that the costs of technical assistance account for a relatively high percentage of the total costs; considers this to be justified in view of this being Estonia’s first EGF application;
2016/10/13
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Sweden submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 31 March 2016, and that the assessment of that applicationfollowing additional information provided by Sweden, its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 5 September 2016, and notified to Parliament that same daye same day, thereby respecting the deadline of 12 weeks from receipt of the completed application;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out thatEmphasises that the regions affected are faced with a relatively large group of older workers with similar backgrounds who have been made redundant at the same time, with and that most of these workersm, particularly those located in Kista, the town with the highest number of redundancies, do not possessing the skills sought after onby the local labour market;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that the Swedish authorities decided to focus possibleSweden’s decision to concentrate potential EGF assistance especially on the Kista, Katrineholm and Kumla sites, as thesewhich face the bigggreatest challenges; recalls that, while also offering individualised help must be offered to workers made redundant at the other sites as well;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Acknowledges Arbetsförmedlingen’s (the Swedish Public Employment Service) assessment that blue-collar workers have potential opportunities in public or private sector service industries, provided major retraining is offered to them;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Recognises that most of the affected white-collar workers are engineers, some of whom are specialised in niches that are unique to Ericsson, but welcomes the confidence of the Swedish PES that a personalised package of training programmes and coaching will enable most of those redundant employees to find new jobs of high quality.
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that Sweden is planning four types of measurthe EGF co-funded personalised services for the redundant workers covered by this application: (i) counselling and career guidance divided in: in-depth assessment and individual planning, guidance counselling and motivation coaching and career planning, (ii)include: counselling and career guidance; sheltered and supported employment and rehabilitation measures, (iii); education and training, (iv); and job search allowances; welcomes the special emphasis that will be placed on participants aged 50 and above when providing motivational coaching and career planning;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes that the income support measures amount to 33,92 % of the overall package of personalised measures, close to the maximum 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation; and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities; considers this relatively high percentage to be justified in view of the significant proportion of older workers concerned and the provision of individual support to participants with learning disabilities;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the Swedish authorities’ assurance that special efforts will be undertaken to break traditional gender barriers, including encouraging male beneficiaries to find jobs in the health care sector, as well as the contribution the measures will make to the 16 Swedish Environmental Quality Objectives;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that Swedenthe Swedish authorities have confirmsed that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that those actions are complementary to actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports in order to ensure full respect for existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates that assistanceWelcomes Sweden’s assurance that a financial contribution from the EGF mustwill not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures for restructuring companies or sectors; notes that Finland has confirmed that the EGF contribution will indeed not replace themthe enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Finland submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 11 March 2016, and that following additional information provided by Finland, its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 29 July 2016, thereby respecting the deadline of 12 weeks from receipt of the completed application;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recognises that this application continues a series of cases revolving around the decline of Nokia in Finland and that two further related applications for workers being made redundant in the ICT sector are expected to follow;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Emphasises the importance of the ICT sector to employment in the regions of Helsinki-Uusimaa, Etelä-Suomi and Länsi-Suomi and the potential for the redundant workers to contribute to the industry if they receive sufficient support through further education, training and plans to take up entrepreneurship;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes the high percentage (close to 80 %) of the overall package being used for personalised services;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes that the pay subsidy mentioned in paragraph 7 is between 30 and 50 % of the worker’s payroll costs and will be given for a period of 6 to 24 months; calls on Member States to pay strict attention when using pay subsidies to ensure that redundant workers hired with a subsidy are not replacing, in whole or in part, a position held previously by another employee at the company concerned; is pleased the Finnish authorities have given assurances that this is the case;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2211(BUD)

7 b. Notes that the income support measures amount to 16,64 % of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the 35 % limit set by the EGF Regulation and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Invites the Commission to evaluate and provide information about the impact of these income support measures over a period of several years, to ensure that they are supporting high-quality employment and not being used to subsidise short- term, low-cost contracts;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. StressNotes that the Finnish authorities have confirmed that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that such actions are complementary to actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present an annual comparative evaluation of those data to ensure full respect of the existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 20 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Reiterates that assistanceWelcomes Finland’s assurance that a financial contribution from the EGF mustwill not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures for restructuring companies or sectors; notes that Finland has confirmed that the EGF contribution will indeed not replace themthe enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Agrees with the Commission that the conditionsintervention criteria set out in Article 4(2) of the EGF Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 are met and that, therefore, Belgium is entitled to a financial contribution of EUR 1 824 041 under thatis Regulation, which represents 60 % of the total cost of EUR 3 040 069;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Belgian authorities submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 17 DecemberCommission respected the deadline of 12 weeks from the reception of the completed application from the Belgian authorities, on 11 February 20156, and that its assessment was finalised by the Commissionuntil finalising its assessment on the compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, on 4 May 2016 and notifiedying it to Parliament thaton the same day;.
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that following the serious disruptions in recent years Unionin the trade in construction machinery has undergone serious disruptions, due to declining public and private investment in infrastructure resulting in a dramatic loss of market share for European producers, coupled with significant increase of steel on the European market the demand for the products produced by the three enterpricses in Europe; points out that this decline in competitiveness has led to the delocalisation, in particular to Asian countriescovered by this application has decreased accordingly;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that following the announcement byof Caterpillar Belgium SA on 23 February 2013 of a collective redundancy procedure in its Gosselies plant, the majority of its 1399 workers were subject of EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar application; and points out that the current application is a follow-up to that application since, as it is part of the same collective redundancy procedure; further points outunderlines that Hainaut is facing a difficult labour market situation with an unemployment rate of 14,5 % (5,9% higher than the national average), 1 236 job losses in 2013 and 1 878 in 2014 in the manufacturing sector, drop in job offers of 13 % since 2012 and high proportion of underqualified labour, as (over half of the job seekers lack upper secondary qualifications); , as well as high levels of long-term unemployment, which stands at 39,0% of overall unemployment in Hainaut Region;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that the Belgian authorities started providing the personalised services to the affected workertargeted beneficiaries on 1 January 2015, well ahead of the application for the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Belgium is planning sixthe following types of measures for redundant workers covered by this application: (i) support/guidance/integration, (ii); facilitating job-search, (iii); integrated training, (iv); support for enterprise creation, (v); support for collective projects, and (vi) job- search and training allowances, taking into consideration the potential of the area and the business environment;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes the fact that the allowances and incentives, for which Belgium confirmed that they are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities, (Actions under Article 7(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation) are limited to less than 5 % of the total costs, which is far below the threshold of 35% of the total cost for the package of personalised measures allowed by the Regulation;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the personalised services provided to NEETsWelcomes that additionally to the 488 workers dismissed, 300 young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 25 from the same region are expected to participate in the measures and receive personalised services co-financed by EGF, which shall include: (i) mobilisation and guidance, either forto further education/training or to follow induction sessions, (ii) training, (iii) to explore interests; specific training courses; personalised upskilling, and (iv); job- search, training and mobility allowances;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes the fact that the Belgian authorities are proposing special measures designed for NEETs, targeting in this way more specifically their needs;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Notes the importance of launching an information campaign in order to reach the NEETs who could be eligible under these measures; recalls its position on the need to help the NEETs in a permanent and sustainable way;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. NotesWelcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised services hwas been drawn up inestablished following further consultations with all stakeholders including social partners, enterprises and the public employment services, who will also follow the implementation of the proposed measures through a monitoring committee;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Welcomes especially the approach of Belgian authorities and the cooperation with social partners for granting support to collective projects for workers who consider setting up a "social enterprise" together as a group, as a measure with a highly value added potential;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF shouldNotes that the proposed actions, constitute active labour market measures within the eligible actions set out in Article 7 of the EGF Regulation and recalls that, in line with this article, the personalised services provided are expected to anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy; notes, at the same time, that these actions do not substitute passive social protection measures;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importanceHighlights the need of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career; expects that the training on offered in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to will meet bothe needs of the dismissed workers but also to the actual workers and the business environment;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 24 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. AsksReiterates the call on the Commission to furtherprovide more detail,s in future proposals, on the sectors in which the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissalshaving prospects to grow, and therefore to hire people, as well as to gather substantiated data on the impact of the EGF funding, including on the quality of jobs and the reintegration rate achieved through EGF;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 26 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that, to date, the Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c. sector has been the subject of 14 EGF applications, including this one, 8 of which were based on trade- related globalisation and 6 on the global financial and economic crisis;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 27 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. AsksReiterates its call to the Commission again to assure public access to all the documents related to EGF cases;.
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Greek authorities submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 26 November 2015, and that its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 14 April 2016Commission respected the deadline of 12 weeks from the reception of the application from the Greek authorities, on 26 November 2015, until finalising its assessment on the compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, on 14 April 2016 and notified it to Parliament on 15 April 2015;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that additionally to the 557 workers dismissed, 543 young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 30 from the same regions are expected to participate in the measures and receive personalised services co-financed by EGF; notes that the request of Greek authorities to include NEETs in these measures is due to the lack of jobs in the region if compared with the high number of job seekers, 73,5% of the unemployed persons being unemployed for more than 12 months in Thessalia (Eurostat);
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the Greek economy was in deep recession for six consecutive years (from 2008 to 2013) and that since 2008, private consumption decreased by 32,3 percentage points while unemployment increased by about 19 percentage points; points to the closure of thousands of enterprises in Greece and theas a consequence of the deep recession of the Greek economy followed by a decline inof household consumption and purchasing power since the beginning of the financial and economic crisis in 2008 and the fact thatthe volumes of retail trade of food, beverages and tobacco were more than 30 % lower in 2015 than the early-crisis volumes of 2008; notes that, for those reasons, the sales of Supermarket Larissa followed the same downturn as the Greek economy and that sales in 2013 were 24 % lower than in 2009trend downwards;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes, therefore, that that, in this economic environment, Supermarket Larissa, a cooperative of small grocery stores, could not overcome its losses and had to close its shops during the second quarter of 2014; points out that this was not prevented by the austerity measures, in particular wage cuts (-30%), the renegotiation of leases and the putting off of the maturity date of bills; notes tdespite the austerity measures taken of wage cuts, renegotiation of leases, proposing cheaper products, reducing operating costs, could not overcome its losses and hatd this situation is also due to the drastic reduction in loans to enterprises, in a context where o close its shops in 2014, followed by the closure of the enterprise and the subsequaentitative easing by the ECB failed to kickstart loans; notes that this case is a dramatic result layoffs in 2015, when the court ruled ofn the continuous pressure by creditors on Greece and of European austerity policy bankruptcy request;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Notes that the income-support measures will be strictly limited to a maximum amount of 35% of the overall package of personalised measures, as set out in the EGF Regulation, and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Greece is planning five types of measures for dismissed workers and NEETs coverthe measures planned by Greece for the dismissed workers and for the NEETs are comprised byin this application: (i)e following categories: occupational guidance, (ii); training, retraining and vocational training, (iii); contributions to business start-ups, (iv); participation allowances and training allowances, (v); mobility allowances;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes the rather high amount (EUR 15 000) to be received, as part of personalised services, by the workers or NEETs who will set up their own business; notes, at the same time, that a large number of the redundant workers have an entrepreneurial background which increases their chances of success in this sector;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Notes the possible tendency that some of the new businesses will take the form of social cooperatives and welcomes, in this context, the efforts of the Greek authorities to enhance the sector of social economy in Greece;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that since the group of targeted NEETs is still to be defined, one of the measures under the occupational guidance measures would be to launch information campaigns aimed specifically at theme importance of launching an information campaign in order to reach the NEETs who could be eligible under these measures; recalls its position to extenon the need theo help tohe NEETs after December 2017, in a permanent and sustainable way, as expressed in its abovementioned resolution of 13 April 2016;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised services hwas been drawn up inestablished through further consultations with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries and social partners;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recallminds that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;.
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 20 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importanceHighlights the need of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career; expects that the training on offered in the coordinated package to be adapted both to thewill meet both needs of the dismissed workers and to the actualhe business environment;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates its cCalls on the Commission to furtherprovide more detail,s in future proposals, on the sectors in which the workers are likely to find employment andhaving prospects to grow, and therefore to hire people, as well as to gather detailsubstantiated data on the impact of the EGF funding in the electronic data exchange system SFC2014, including on the type and quality of jobs found and on the medium and long-term trend as regards the rate of reintegration rate achieved through EGF interventions;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 22 #

2016/2050(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Asks againRecalls its appeal to the Commission to assure public access to all the documents related to EGF cases;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the French authorities submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 19 November 2015, and that its assessment was finalised by the CommissCommission respected the deadline of 12 weeks from the reception of the application from the French authorities, on 19 November 2015, until the finalisation of its assessment on the compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, on 7 April 2016 and notified it to Parliament that day;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes that France has put in place the social plan, in which the company MoryGlobal also participates financially, before obtaining the top up from EGF; appreciates that the assistance requested from EGF does not include measures under Article 7(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation, namely allowances, but is orientated on measures with real added value for the future reintegration into the labour market of the workers made redundant;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the EGF cofunded personalised services to be provided to the redundant workers consist of advice and guidance provided by a team of expert consultants, which are additional tocome on top of the social plan and the Contrat de Séecurisation Professionnelle funded by the Freanch State to help the we in orkders back into employment; notes that the three contractors operating the team of consultants are the ones providing services to the workers made redundant by Mory-Ducros to support the workers on the labour market; expects the Commission and the French authorities to strictfirmly follow the principle according to whichof payments to the agencies are to be madecontracted on the basis of the results achieved;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the contractors shall provide each participant with a personalised career path and a sufficient number of job offers and that they must also enable them to consult general experts or experts specialised in enterprise creation, who have excellent knowledge of the employment market in the region and are available and responsive, as well as to provide training workshops for general competences, training in the use of the internet, job fairs and meetings with employers or sector representatives, and meetings with training institutions;(BPI, Sodie and AFPA Transitions) shall assist the redundant workers and help them find solutions to remain in the labour market and find new jobs, through personalised services such as collective and individual information sessions, job transition and accompaniment towards new jobs
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that France indicated that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up in consultation with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries and the social partners;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recallminds that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;.
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets thatNotes that the contractors operating the team of consultants are the same as those providing services to the workers made redundant by Mory- Ducros; calls on the Commission did noto provide an analysisevaluation of the cost- effectiveness of the ongoing support for the redundant workers of Mory- Ducros, as the current application is a follow-up to the EGF/2014/017 FR/Mory-Ducros application; further regrets the lack of substantiated data especially as, and the personalised services are provided by the same contractors;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the French authorities confirm that the eligibleproposed actions do not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments; reiterates its call on the Commission to ensure full respect for existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur and that they are complementary with actions funded by the Structural Funds;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates its call oncalls its appeal to the Commission to assure public access to all the documents related to EGF cases;
2016/05/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Agrees withcknowledges the measures proposed by the Commission to be financed as tTechnical aAssistance in accordance withto finance expenditure mentioned in Article 11(1) and (4) as well as within Article 12(2), (3) and (4) of the EGF Regulation;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the importance of networking and exchange of information on the EGF, supports, therefore, the funding of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF as well as ond ther networking activities amseminars ong the Member States including this year's networking seminars for practitioners on the implementation of the EGF; underlines the neeimplementation of EGF; expects that this exchange of information shall also contribute to the better and fmor evaluae detailed reporting on the outcomes of technical assistance measures in order to ensure best value for Union money investedsuccess rate of the EGF supported measures in the Member States, in particular about the reach and re- employment rate of beneficiaries;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the integration of reporting into the electronic data exchange system (SFC2014); considers that this will ease the administrative burden for the Member States and facilitate the use of reports for evaluation purposes;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Notes that the procedure to integrate the EGF into SFC2014 has been going on for years and the relevant costs for the EGF have been relatively high; notes that this level of costs will need to be maintained for another year after which the cost for maintenance will be lower;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates its demand toExpresses its regret that the Commission did noto present the progress of integration into SFC2014 from the beginning ofin 2011 until 2014 and asks the Commission to present a timeline of further development of SFC2014;s was requested in Parliament's Resolution of 24 June 2015* on the proposal for the Technical Assistance in 2015; reminds the Commission to present the progress as requested above including the latest developments; ________________ * Texts adopted P8_TA(2015)0237.
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates its cCalls on the Commission to invite the Parliament, within reasonable deadlines, to to both the expert group meetings and seminars in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission1; ________________ 1 Official Journal of the European Union welcomes that social partners are invited to participate; ______________ 1 OJ L 304/47, 20.11.2010, p. 47.
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Expresses its concern that the Commission decided to launch a public procurement for the assistance of external experts for the mid-term evaluation, as Article 20 of the Regulation only provides for assistance of external experts in the case of the ex-post evaluation; calls on the Commission to provide explanation for the selected procedure and details about awarding the procurement;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2025(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines the importance of increasing general awareness about EGF and its visibility; reminds applicant Member States of their role to publicise the actions funded by EGF to the targeted beneficiaries, authorities, social partners, the media and the general public, as set out in Article 12 of the Regulation;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Expresses its regret that the Commission was unable to comply with the deadline for the completion of the assessment of this application; notes that the reason for the delay was an exceptional shortage of staff; considers that if the delay is the result of recent staff cuts in the Commission, it should be recalled that in the interest of the beneficiaries, assistance should be made available as quickly and efficiently as possible; calls on Member States and the Union institutions involved in the EGF decision-making process to do their utmost to reduce processing time and simplify procedures so as to ensure the smooth and rapid adoption of decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that the redundancies represent a challenge in the region of the county of Västerbotten (of which Umeå is the capital) as the region's job vacancies are in highly qualified fields while most of the targeted workers have only secondary education; notes that the application refers to a recent report claiming that 40 000 new workers will be needed in the Västerbotten region; welcomes the measures targeting workers who regard their educational level as insufficient for the job vacancies identified in the region, which require specialised education;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs) are not included in the application, because this region is not eligible for such intervention under the Youth Employment Initiative;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the measures targeting motivation and health of the workers; considers such actions necessary to strengthen motivation and provide help for those whose health was damaged by being made redundant; appreciates furthermore measures for the validation of competences of the participants;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Notes the high amount to be spent on allowances and incentives; notes also that the funding of these actions is limited to a maximum amount of 35% of the total costs for the coordinated package of personalised measures, as set out in the EGF Regulation, and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Awaits the answer from the Commission confirming that the proposed job search allowance does not substitute the obligation of the Member State with regard to active labour market or social protection measures as well as a detailed analysis showing the complementarity of the measures supported by the EGF;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recallminds that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2022(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to carefully assess cases where EGF funding is requested for redundancies resulting from delocalisation strategies of enterprises and ensure that these enterprises fully complied with mandatory responsibilities towards the redundant workers, by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements and that EGF is used as a complimentary measure;
2016/03/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that Saint-Gobain Group was in 2013 forced to close another production plant in Wallonia which was subject of the EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit application relating to 257 redundancies in the same sector; notes that several measures in the two applications are similar ;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the derogation from Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation in this case relates to the number of redundancies which is not significantly lower than the threshold of 500 redundancies; welcomes that the application aims to support a further 100 NEETs;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2013(BUD)

7a. Welcomes the support for collective projects; calls on the Commission to assess the results of this type of measure in other applications in order to determine its benefits to the participants;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. NWelcomes that the application contains measures specifically aimed to provide assistance to NEETs; notes that the personalised services provided to NEETs shall include: (i) mobilisation and guidance either for further education/training or to follow induction sessions, (ii) training, (iii) personalised upskilling, and (iv) job-search and training allowances;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Appreciates that the allowances and incentives to be provided as part of the proposed measures are limited to 5,52 % of the total estimated costs;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines that in case of successive applications from the same geographical region the Commission should collect and analyse the experiences from previous applications and ensure that in case of new applications any conclusion of that analysis is taken into due account;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 83 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Rapid technological developments continue to transform the way works and other subject-matter are created, produced, distributed and exploited. New business models and new actors continue to emerge. The objectives and the principles laid down by the Union copyright framework remain sound. However, legal uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and users, as regards certain uses, including cross-border uses, of works and other subject-matter in the digital environment. As set out in the Communication of the Commission entitled ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to adapt and supplement the current Union copyright framework. This Directive provides for rules to adapt certain exceptions and limitations to digital and cross-border environments, as well as measures to facilitate certain licensing practices as regards the dissemination of out-of- commerce works and the online availability of audiovisual works on video- on-demand platforms with a view to ensuring wider access to content. In order to achieve a well-functioning marketplace for copyright, there should also be rules on rights in publications, on the use of works and other subject-matter by online service providers storing and giving access to user uploaded content and on the transparency of authors' and performers' contracts. _________________ 26 COM(2015) 626 final. COM(2015) 626 final.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 281 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) A free and pluralist press is essential to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information. It provides a fundamental contribution to public debate and the proper functioning of a democratic society. In the transition from print to digital, publishers of press publications are facing problems in licensing the online use of their publications and recouping their investments. In the absence of recognition of publishers of press publications as rightholders, licensing and enforcement in the digital environment is often complex and inefficient.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) The organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press publications needs to be recognised and further encouraged to ensure the sustainability of the publishing industry. It is therefore necessary to provide at Union level a harmonised legal protection for press publications in respect of digital uses. Such protection should be effectively guaranteed through the introduction, in Union law, of rights related to copyright for the reproduction and making available to the public of press publications in respect of digital uses.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 312 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) For the purposes of this Directive, it is necessary to defineclarify the sconceptpe of press publication in a way that embraces only journalistic publications, published by a service provider, periodically or regularly updated in any media, for the purpose of informing or entertaining. Such publications would include, for instance, daily newspapers, weeklotection set out in Article s2 and 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC. In order to improve legal certainty for all concerned parties, and to ensure the freedom to carry out certain acts necessary for monthly magazines of general or special ithe normal functioning of the Internest and news websites. Periodical publications which are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as scientific journals, should not be covered by the protection granted to press publications under this Directive. This protection doess well as to take account of certain fundamental rights, these Articles should not extend to acts of hyperlinking, which do not constitute communication to the public.
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 326 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) The rights granted to the publishers of press publications under this Directive should have the same scope as the rights of reproduction and making available to the public provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC, insofar as digital uses are concerned. They should also be subject to the same provisions on exceptions and limitations as those applicable to the rights provided for in Directive 2001/29/EC including the exception on quotation for purposes such as criticism or review laid down in Article 5(3)(d) of that Directive.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 340 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) The protection granted to publishers of press publications under this Directive should not affect the rights of the authors and other rightholders in the works and other subject-matter incorporated therein, including as regards the extent to which authors and other rightholders can exploit their works or other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. Therefore, publishers of press publications should not be able to invoke the protection granted to them against authors and other rightholders. This is without prejudice to contractual arrangements concluded between the publishers of press publications, on the one side, and authors and other rightholders, on the other side.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 519 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4
(4) ‘press publication’ means a fixation of a collection of literary works of a journalistic nature, which may also comprise other works or subject-matter and constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or special interest magazine, having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics and published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and control of a service provider.deleted
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 731 #

2016/0280(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11
Protection of press publications 1. Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications. 2. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall leave intact and shall in no way affect any rights provided for in Union law to authors and other rightholders, in respect of the works and other subject- matter incorporated in a press publication. Such rights may not be invoked against those authors and other rightholders and, in particular, may not deprive them of their right to exploit their works and other subject-matter independently from the press publication in which they are incorporated. 3. Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC and Directive 2012/28/EU shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1. 4. The rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall expire 20 years after the publication of the press publication. This term shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the date of publication.Article 11 deleted concerning digital uses
2017/04/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 2
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 53(1), 62, 151 and 62153 thereof,
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The free movement of workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services are fundamental principles of the internal market in the Union enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The implementation of those principles is further developed by the Union aimed at guaranteeing a level playing field for businesses and respect for the rights of workerfair business climate as well as respect for the rights of workers and the improvement of working conditions.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whetherrevise the Posting of Workers Directive stillin order to ensure it strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services andensure a fair business climate as well as the need to protect the rights of posted workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The objective of this Directive is to guarantee the protection of workers and ensure a fair business climate across the EU by safeguarding the principle of equal pay for equal work at the same place of work.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2016/0070(COD)

(5b) In the event no substantial employment relationship can be identified in the listed country of establishment, the applicable terms and conditions of employments should be those of the host Member State, unless these are less favourable to the worker than those of the country of establishment, in which case the latter should apply.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 c (new)
(5c) The right to collective bargaining and the right to take collective actions, including the right to strike, are fundamental rights recognised in Member States and at Union level. This directive guarantees the exercise of these rights.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignments, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in the applicable terms and conditions of employment should be those established by the host Member State in accordance with national law and/or practices, without prejudice to terms and conditions of employment which thare wmork is carried oute favourable to the worker. In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member States therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I Regulationagreement under the law or collective agreements of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) It is settled case law that restrictions to the freedom to provide services are only admissible if justifican be restricted by overriding reasons in the public interest and must bethat proportectionate and necessary of workers constitutes such an overriding reason of public interest, including pay clauses in public procurement.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) The race to the bottom only on prices would undermine and destroy the systems of collective bargaining.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Because of the highly mobile nature of work in international road transport, the implementation ofthe transport sector, the posting of workers directive raises particular legal questions and difficulties (especially where the link with the concerned Member State is insufficient). It would be most suited for these challenges to be addresssupplemented through sector-specific legislation together with other EU initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal roadworking environment and conditions in the transport marketsector.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) As posting of workers is transnational and cross-border by nature, the Member States shall establish a European system of labour inspectorates and labour inspections. At least the exchange of information on posting companies and posted workers shall be established and fraud and misuse listed.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In a competitiven internal market, service providers compete not only on the basis of a labour costs but also on factors such as productivity and efficiency, or the quality and innovation of their goods and services but should not compete on the basis of labour costs.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' exclusive competence to set rules on remuneration in accordance with their law and practice. However, national rules on remuneration applied to posted workers must be justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of serv, including the definition of, remuneration in accordance with national law and/or practices.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicableand/or collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers and posted workers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish, in accordance with national law and practice, the constituent elements of remuneration, on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In accordance with the ILO Recommendation No 198 on the Determination of Employment Relationships, the determination of the existence of such a relationship should be guided primarily by the facts relating to the performance of work and the remuneration of the worker, notwithstanding how the relationship is characterized in any contrary arrangement, contractual or otherwise, that may have been agreed between the parties.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States mayshall ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration. Where such rules on remuneration exist at national level, the Member State may apply them in a non-discriminatory manner to undertakings posting workers to its territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(1a) Joint and several liability mechanisms will apply in all sectors where a posting takes place. The main contractor shall be liable for the compliance of all subcontractors with employment terms and conditions and social security obligations.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
(–1) In Article 1, paragraph 3, point (b) is amended as follows: "(b) post workers to an establishment or to an undertaking owned by the group in the territory of a Member State, provided it concerns a genuine provision of service and there is an employment relationship between the undertaking making the posting and the worker during the period of posting; or"
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
(–1) in Article 1, paragraph 3, point (c) is replaced by the following: (c) being a temporary employment undertaking or placement agency, hire out a worker oto a user undertaking established or operating in the territory of a Member State, provided that: – there is an employment relationship between the temporary employment undertaking or placement agency and the worker during the period of posting; and – the worker temporarily carries out a task in a Member State other than the one in which he or she usually works, in accordance with Article 4(3) of Directive 2014/67/EC.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point c
(–1) In Article 1, paragraph 3, point c) is amended as follows: "(c) being a temporary employment undertaking or placement agency, hire out a worker to a user undertaking established or operating in the territory of a Member State, provided there is an genuine employment relationship between the temporary employment undertaking or placement agency and the worker during the period of postingat least 3 months prior to and during the period of posting and provided the worker temporarily carries out work in a Member State other than in the habitual place of work in accordance with Article 4(3) of Directive 2014/67/EU."
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(–1) In Article 1, the following paragraph 4a is added: 4a. This Directive is without prejudice to the competence of the Member States to apply or introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions, which are more favourable to workers, or to permit or promote the application of collective agreement provisions, which are more favourable to workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – title
Posting exceeding twenty-fourhree months
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1
1. When tThe anticipated or the effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried outshall not exceed three months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In case of prima facie evidence, which justifies doubts about a genuine self-employed worker, the concerned worker shall be deemed a posted worker. In case of prima facie evidence, which justifies doubts about a genuine posted worker or a genuine posting company, the concerned worker shall be deemed a worker of the host member state.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The applicable terms and conditions of employment shall be those of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted. This is without prejudice to terms and conditions of employment that are more favourable to the worker.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workers performing the same or similar tasks at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. According to the principle of equal pay for equal work at the same place of work, Member States shall ensure that, whatever the law applicable to the employment relationship, the undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) guarantee workers posted to their territory at least the terms and conditions of employment covering the following matters which, in the Member State where the work is carried out, are laid down:
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– by collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable within the meaning of paragraph 8:
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) allowances associated with the posting and/or reimbursement of expenditures on travel, board and lodging.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 398 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitthe concept of remuneration shall be defined by national law and/or praction awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, ince of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 458 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1a
1a. If undertakings established in the territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration,, the Member State may, on a non–discriminatory and proportionate basisshall, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory. This shall not preclude the application of stricter national rules or the introduction of such rules
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 465 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1a a (new)
(ba) The following paragraph is added: 1aa. The principle of joint and several liability of the employer is applicable along the whole subcontracting chain.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 480 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 7 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph 7a is added: 7a. In case the employer deduces costs related to posting, such as housing, board and transport costs from the remuneration of the posted worker, the posted worker has the right to claim these costs from the employer at the appropriate court. The same right exists for a worker who is deemed a posted worker or is deemed a worker of the host member state
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 481 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 7a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph 7a is added: 7a. This Directive shall not affect the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other collective actions, or the right to collective bargaining in accordance with national law and/or practice.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 488 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(d) PIn paragraph 9 is deleted, the following subparagraph is added: Where the conditions listed in Article 1(3) (c) are not fulfilled, Article 2 a a new shall apply.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 490 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 9 a (new)
(da) after paragraph 9, the following paragraph is inserted: 9a. Prior to posting, the posting company shall transmit information regarding the posting to the competent authority of the Member State to whose territory the worker will be posted. Information shall include inter alia the name of the posted worker, the name of the posting company, the tasks and duties of the posted worker, the place of work, the name of the company where the work is to be carried out, the first day of work and the planned duration of the posting.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 495 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 10
(e) The second subparagraph of paragraph 10 is deleted.paragraph 10 is amended as follows: 10. This Directive shall not preclude the application by Member States, in complior in accordance with the Treaty, to national undertakings and to the undertakingspractice of other States, on a basis of equality of treatment, of: – social partners, terms and conditions of employment on matters other than those referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1Article 3 (1) in the case of social and public policy provisions, – terms and conditions of employment laid down in the collective agre and/or to comply with obligations under international conventions, including provisions for the improvements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 and concerning activities other than those referred to in the Annexf the protection of workers, equal treatment and the prevention of abusive practices and circumvention of terms and conditions of employment.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 499 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 10 a (new)
(ea) after paragraph 10 the following paragraph 10a is added: 10a. Social and public policy provisions include inter alia pay clauses in public procurement.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 509 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) in article 4, after paragraph 2 the following paragraph is added: 2a. The Member States' labour inspectorates shall establish a regular exchange of information about posting coordinated by the Platform for Undeclared Work.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 514 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States(2a) Article 5 is amended as follows: The host Member States and the Member States of establishment are responsible for the monitoring, control and enforcement of the obligations laid down in this directive and shall take appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with this Directive.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 516 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2b) in Article 5 paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: They shall in particular ensure that adequate procedures are available to workers and/or theirworkers' representatives for the enforcement of obligations under this Directive."
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 517 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 c (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2c) in Article 5 after paragraph 2 the following paragraph 2 a is added: 2a. In the event a posted worker or a posting undertaking do not meet the conditions to be a posted worker or a posting undertaking, Article 45 TFEU apply to the terms and conditions of employment.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to Europfound´s report on Third European Company Survey - Direct and indirect employee participation;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 b (new)
- having regard to Eurofound´s report Board-level employee representation in Europe;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas forms of worker participation at company level exist in 18 Member States of the European Union and in Norway, but they differ enormously owing to their respective economic and social historical development15; __________________ 15 http://de.worker- participation.eu/National-Industrial- Relations/Across-Europe/Board-level- Representation2/MAP-Board-level- representation-in-the-European-Economic- Area2;Conchon Aline (2015) Workers’ voice in corporate governance: A European perspective, https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Reports /Workers-voice-in-corporate-governance.- A-European-perspective; Aline Chonchon, Norbert Kluge and Michael Stollt(EGI)Worker board-level participation in the 31 European Economic Area countries (August 2015 update) http://www.worker- participation.eu/National-Industrial- Relations/Across-Europe/Board-level- Representation2/TABLE-Worker-board- level-participation-in-the-31-European- Economic-Area-countries
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas comparison between groups of Member States shows that the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy have been achieved more effectively by the group which has active worker participation at company level1a; __________________ 1ahttp://www.worker- participation.eu/About-WP/European- Participation.Index.EPI
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the proportion of women on supervisory boards is relatively low, yet is in many countries higher amongst the workers' representatives than amongst other supervisory board members1a; __________________ 1aMarion Weckes, Geschlechterverteilung in Vorständen und Aufsichtsräten (Gender representation on management boards and supervisory boards), http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_mbf_report_ 2015_10.pdf
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Fc. whereas worker participation in supervisory boards of European corporate forms should also apply to SMEs1a; __________________ 1a Up to 250 workers can be employed in SMEs.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F d (new)
Fd. whereas both the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Parliament have advocated the improvement of employee representation at supervisory board level1a; __________________ 1a Jean-Claude Juncker and Martin Schulz, Die Mitbestimmung, 5/2014, p.16 ff.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas an undertaking may choose any form of legal organisation of another Member State in order to avoid worker participation in the Member State in which it is actually located1a; __________________ 1a http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_mbf_report_ 2015_8.pdf
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets that the Commission in its annex to the first preliminary outline of a European Pillar of Social Rights did not, under 'Social dialogue and involvement of workers', mention any of the existing forms of European worker participation at supervisory board level for which a specific legal basis is provided in Article 153(f) TFEU;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the EU agency Eurofound to take account in its 2018 work programme of studies examining the cooperation between European and national stakeholders in multinational companies: firstly, the cooperation between European Works Councils and national works councils, and secondly, the forms of cooperation between employee representatives at supervisory board level and national works councils; and thirdly, where agreements have been reached, how these agreements have been implemented in the parts of the companies located in the various Member States; account should also be taken in this project of the extent to which worker participation influences company strategy;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council, in the area of European company law to seek at an early stage enhanced cooperation with the bodes responsible for employment because their opinions are frequently ignored until it is too late or not sufficiently taken into account;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to introduce in the Directive on the European Company (SE) adequate minimum EU rules governing employee representation on supervisory boards, rather than referring to national law or to revisinge the Directive so that the involvement of workers in supervisory boards is not solely determined by conditions when a company is established, but account is also taken of subsequent developments and, in particular, changes in the number of employees;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in the Directive on mergers of limited liability companies adequate minimum European rules for employee representation on supervisory boards, rather than referring to national legislation;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to revise Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 200421 on takeover bids to ensure that the workers of a bidding company are also consulted, rather than just those of the company subject to the takeover bid; __________________ 21, and to improve fulfilment of commitments by companies by means of the threat of sanction mechanisms1a; __________________ 21 OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 12. OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 12. 1a 2010 takeover of the UK firm Cadbury by Kraft, in which Kraft failed to honour its promise to keep open a key factory with 400 employees. http://www.worker- participation.eu/About-WP/What-s- new/Benchmarking-Working-Europe- 2015 Chapter 4, Articulating workers' participation, p.67
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Calls on the Commission in all legislative acts on European company law to provide that the place of a company’s registered offices must be identical with its actual place of business so as to prevent the circumvention of the requirement regarding employee representation on supervisory boards, such as would be possible under the proposal for single- member private limited liability companies (SUP), and, instead of this proposal, to submit a proposal for a directive on the cross-border transfer of the registered office, as decided by the European Parliament22; __________________ 22 Resolution of 10 March2 February 200912 with recommendations to the Commission on a 14th company law directive on the cross- border transfer of the registered office of a company seats, P7_TA(200912)008619.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Believes that the freedom of establishment for companies is reasonably assured through a directive on the cross- border transfer of company seats; by contrast, the possibility of a splitting of seats would lead only to the establishment of letter box companies, money laundering and tax evasion and would thus create legal uncertainty for all creditors;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to develop standards for rules governing employee representation on supervisory boards that can be applied as a universal model in the form of a directive to all European corporate law directives which takes into account, but does not replace, existing rules on information and consultation; points out that, as such rules are minimum standards, all other provisions that are more favourable must take precedence and existing national rules must not be weakened;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Considers minimum European rules on employee representation on supervisory boards under forms of European corporate law to be necessary in order to take account of ever expanding integration and increasing Europeanisation of undertakings and their workforces and employee representations within Europe that can no longer be covered by purely national legislation1a; __________________ 1aProf. Dr. Rüdiger Krause, 'Zur Bedeutung des Unionsrechts für die unternehmerische Mitbestimmung', annexed to: Mitbestimmungs-Report No. 17 (December 2015), Hans-Böckler- Stiftung http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_mbf_report_ 2015_17.pdf
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recommends that this Directive should be applicable to all forms of company with a supervisory board atunder European levelcorporate law, i.e. account should be taken of public and private companies, partnerships and limited companies and also workers employed in the affiliated parent and subsidiary companies;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Suggests that the nature and scope of decisions requiring approval should be established in this directive by minimum standards, which should be developed by rules in the Member States23; __________________ 23 e.g. Article 95 AktG, Austria. e.g. Article 95(5) of the Public Limited Company Act and Article 30j(5) of the Limited-Liability Company Act, Austria.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recommends, with respect to the number of employee representatives on supervisory boards, including its direct or indirect subsidiaries and affiliates with more than 50 employees25, that half the number of seats on the supervisory board should be reserved for workers or their representatives; __________________ 25 In Sweden from 50 workers. In Sweden from 25 workers and in Denmark from 35 workers.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses that such a directive must be compatible with the principles of proportionality and of subsidiarity because, as a rule, every undertaking freely decides whether it wishes to become a type of enterprise under European law or prefers a form of establishment under national law;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2209(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that following an application from 2013, this is the second application relating to redundancies in the Ford Genk plant;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2209(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes that dismissed workers can benefit from a large variation of proposed measures, containing a number of actions for individual job search assistance, case management and general information services; training and re-training, also provided by the former employer;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2015/2209(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that vocational training measures should aim to improve workers’ employability and should be adapted to the actual labour market demands; notes at the same time that the training and re- training measures should recognise and also build upon the specific skills and competences that the affected workers have acquired in the automotive and its supplying industry;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2015/2209(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Reminds that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2015/2209(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Welcomes that the authorities plan to utilise most of the available funds for personalised services and only 4.94% of the total costs for the coordinated package of personalised services will be used for allowances and incentives, which remains much below the maximum allowed 35% ;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that dismissed workers can benefit from a range of measures aiming to re-integrate them into the labour market; considers that the estimated number of participants in business start- up advisory service is low, at only 25 estimated beneficiaries;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Welcomes that the management and control of this application will be administered by the same bodies which administer the European Social Fund within the Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs and which also administered the previous EGF contributions;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes that the authorities plan to utilise the maximum allowed 35% of total costs for the coordinated package of personalised services on allowances and incentives in form of training allowance (Transferkurzarbeitergeld) constituting 60% or 67% of the worker previous net income – depending on the household situation of the beneficiary;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Emphasises that funding provided for training allowance (in the present case Transferkurzarbeitergeld) must not replace the legal obligation of the Member State or the former employer; calls on both the Commission and the Member State to provide clear and coherent information to specify to what extent Transferkurzarbeitergeld constitutes a legal obligation once the Transfergesellschaft has been set up; requests coherence in both funding practice and information to the Parliament; expects, therefore, the Commission to provide thorough and coherent analysis and details on the elements that go beyond the legal obligations of the Member States; reiterates its position that EGF funding should be used for ‘Transferkurzarbeitergeld’ in order to enable the transfer company to go beyond what it could normally do for the workers, by providing more personalised and in- depth measures than would be possible without EGF support; emphasises that Parliament will continue to monitor that the EGF is not used to replace obligations by a Member State or a company;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Calls on the Commission to establish a consistent approach in case of applications including the “Transferkurzarbeitergeld” measure, by consistently defining it in each application and thoroughly checking and citing evidence that the specific measure is indeed eligible for EGF funding as laid down in Article 7 of the EGF Regulation and does not in any way substitute passive social protection measures and that the risk of double financing is excluded;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. Notes that the social partners agreed on the creation of three transfer companies in order to carry out the measures for the dismisses workers, which is in line with the practice in Germany; welcomes that the workers dismissed in the supplier company (Johnson Controls Objekt Bochum GmbHCo. KG) will also be able to participate in the measures carried out by the transfer companies;
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2208(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Reminds that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
2015/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2013/2177(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A (d) (new)
Ad. Points out how planned works closure and redundancies threaten to bring about the irrecoverable loss on a huge scale of individual workers’ knowledge and experience as well as the experience of an entire sector of industry built up in Europe over centuries;
2013/10/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2013/2177(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A (i) (new)
Ai. Points out that works closures and/or redundancies in the steel industry often affect large numbers of employees, and that in many cases there is also a knock- on effect of redundancies in supplier industries and other companies; points out further that, in the past, this effect has had severe consequences for the economic structure of entire regions and that, therefore, a sustainable employment policy should be regarded inter alia as a form of structural-policy investment at regional level;
2013/10/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2013/2177(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 (d) (new)
3d. Demands that its resolutions on information and consultation of workers and anticipation and management of restructuring (P7_TA-PROV(2013)0005) and on cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (P7_TA-Prov(2013)0386) be implemented as soon as possible so that those who work in the sector are not left to bear the brunt of the restructuring it is undergoing;
2013/10/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2013/2177(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 (i) (new)
3i. Calls for the existing directives on the individual and collective rights of workers and their representatives (Directive 98/59 on collective redundancies, Directive 2001/23 on transfers of undertakings, Directive 2002/14 on a general framework for informing and consulting employees, Directive 2009/38 on European works councils and Directive 2001/86 on involvement of employees, etc.) to be applied in a timely manner and in full in all management decisions, and for management not to present employees and their representatives with faits accomplis;
2013/10/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2013/2177(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 (b) (new)
5b. Calls on all stakeholders to support the concept of steel industry employers undertaking to create a funding pot from which to finance measures for mitigating the impact on employees of the sector’s restructuring; these would cover, as a priority, effective schemes for further training and/or retraining, employment and health protection and rules on early retirement (on health grounds); redundancy with severance pay should be a last resort;
2013/10/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that utility services have common characteristics; urges that basic consumer rights which cover all utility serviceUrges that basic consumer rights should be harmonised at Community level;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that all consumers, irrespective of their financial circumstances, shouldmust be guaranteed the human right of access to utility services and that special arrangements, such as exemption from charges, should be introduced for 'vulnerable consumers'; points out that any consumer may find him/herself in a situation in which he/she needs special protection;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the liberalisation of energy markets has not systematically led to greater competition and lower prices for consumers and,but that rather, in many cases, oligopolies have formed which control the market; points out, moreover, that from consumers' point of view, has made the range of services and tariffs available has become more confusing;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that the liberalisation of postal services has not brought the promised benefits for consumers, but has instead – particularly in rural areas – destroyed structures which it will be very difficult to re-establish;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to study the impact of the liberalisation of postal services, in particular in order to determine whether a reliable universal service is being provided and whether people working for mail delivery firms enjoy decent working conditions, and propose appropriate measures to remedy these undesirable developments;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2013/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that high-quality, comprehensive and freely accessible local public transport constitutes a basic service which must also be made availableguaranteed in areas where it is less profitable;
2013/12/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 33 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 23 May 2013 on labour conditions and health and safety standards following the recent factory fires and building collapse in Bangladesh1, __________________ 1 P7_TA(2013)0230
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas labour inspections are concerned both with the observance of ordinary laws and regulations, e.g. on working time, breaks etc., and with the whole field of employment and health protection; and whereas inspections also need to focus more effectively, now and in future, on observance of the rules not only in open-ended full-time employment but also in the various types of temporary and atypical employment, such as part- time and short-term work and contract labour as well as cross-border work, including by posted workers, and on curbing the use of self-employed workers in fraudulent situations of bogus self- employment or bogus posting, associated in many cases with letter-box companies and/or contract labour;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas, through contracting and sub-contracting, recourse to external providers and the worldwide relocation of subordinate production processes, companies are delegating to other entities, and in most cases to weaker ones, their responsibility and liability for working conditions and workplace safety and health protection throughout regional, national, European and international output chains;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the responsibility of multinational companies for the working conditions, livelihood and health of the workers who produce goods and provide services does not end at the shop door or the factory gate, nor can it be guaranteed by CSR agreements alone;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas undeclared work has negative consequences for Member States’ economies and for the financial sustainability of the European social model, and undermines the funding and provision of social benefits and public services, and imposes insecurity, vulnerability and poverty on the people concerned, both while they are working and in their old age;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Reminds the Member States that they have all signed and ratified International Labour Organisation Convention No 81 on Labour Inspection; calls on them accordingly to respectenforce the Convention’s principles;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Member States, in cases where labour inspections uncover abuse, to protect the workers concerned and enable them to assert their rights at no cost; points out that measures to that end, such as a direct right of complaint for victimspersons affected or a collective right of complaint, are effective means of protecting workers affected;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to criminalise the non-respect of working conditions;make observance of the relevant rules the primary aim of labour inspections and to ensure that action is taken in the following sequence: establishing observance of the rules and putting an end to abuses, inter alia by providing employers with information and advising them; registering undeclared workers retroactively, etc.
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Deplores the marked rise in the incidence of bogus self-employment, particularly in the construction sector and in abattoirs; calls on Member States to introduce appropriate inspection measures to combat bogus self- employment, for example by laying down criteria to determine what constitutes employment; statutory presumptions should be introduced and the law should be simplified, or the burden of proof should be reversed, so as to make cases of bogus self-employment easier to prove;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that national programmes for the further training of labour inspectors should include specific modules on undeclared work and on related topics such as migration and human trafficking; considers that the first concern should be to protect the people affected and that those profiting from exploitation should be held to account;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises that there is a growing trend towards self-employment, outsourcing und subcontracting; considers that systems of general contractor liability for the entire subcontracting chain constitute a useful tool for improved monitoring of public procurement, and that they should be introduced in all Member States; considers further that fraud involving sub-contracting, letter-box companies, bogus self-employment, bogus posting and contract labour should not be financially worthwhile, and that the incentive to engage in it will be removed, and a deterrent effect achieved, by making it easier to prove and/or reversing the burden of proof and by relying on statutory presumptions;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on Member States, under mutual recognition arrangements, to deploy national labour inspectors with the requisite authorisation to conduct cross- border inspections in factories, building sites etc. unannounced; calls on the Member States and the Commission to consider whether EU labour inspectors should be appointed to carry out such tasks instead of, in conjunction with or in addition to the national inspectors; calls on Member States to extend the powers of national labour inspectors in the country where a given company has its headquarters, or its European headquarters, so that they can inspect its entire output chain;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2013/2073(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the employment aspects of the Youth Strategy have become ever more pressing given the current crisis and alarmingly high levels of youth unemployment; stresses that the next cycle (2013-2015), by focusing on youth unemployment, education and training, should contribute to the two overall objectives of the Youth Strategy of creating equal opportunities for youth in the labour market and promoting social inclusion; emphasises that the Youth Strategy is intended to create high-quality jobs first and foremost in the Member State in question, enabling young people to live independently and free of poverty;
2013/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2013/2073(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals for a Quality Framework on Traineeships and an Alliance for Apprenticeships, aimed at promoting high-quality traineeships across the EU; recalls that internships should be carried out only as part of a training or university qualification; calls on the Member States to urgently implement the Youth Guarantee in order to combat youth unemployment, drawing on the EUR 6 billion in EU funds available for the Youth Employment Initiative; calls on the Commission to give practical support to Member States implementing the Youth Guarantee;
2013/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2013/2073(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that European funding can act as an important complement to necessary investments from national budgets; calls on the Member States to exploit the potential of the European Social Fund (ESF) when implementing the Youth Strategy; stresses that resources towards youth employment should be seen as an investment; notes that the planned financing of the Youth Strategy is not sufficient, especially for the regions most affected by the crisis; stresses that financing the employment of young people will require massive investment in new jobs;
2013/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Strongly supports the actions proposed in the fourth pillar of the Action Plan; reiterates its call for a legal act on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring; attaches particular importance to long-term planning for structural change designed to ensure that, if labour requirements change, skill levels will be such as to secure employment and the transition to new forms of production and business models will be gradual;
2013/07/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for stronger coordination of demand-side measures, including financial incentives and taxation policy, both on vehicles and fuels; asks the Commission to follow the guidelines on financial incentives with more binding actions to ensure a reasonably level playing field and contribute to the competitiveness of the industry across the EU;
2013/06/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for even better use to be made of EURES, and, in this respect, supports the use of EURES not only as a means of advising workers and job-seekers on their right to free movement, but also as a labour market instrument with a special focus on placement in permanent full-time employment enabling workers to live their own lives;
2013/07/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the importance of public intervention to ensure that the negative social consequences of any restructuring in the sector are kept to a minimum or eliminated; attaches particular importance to long-term planning for structural change so as to ensure that, if labour requirements change, the level of skills will be such as to secure employment, and that the transition to new forms of production and business models will be gradual; believes that a European framework for anticipating change and softening the social impact of restructuring, including a legislative act, is necessary, also in order to avoid any distortions to the internal market;
2013/06/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Maintains that whenever restructuring is to take place, at whatever level, the social partners should be involved at an early stage and that, as regards the role of national trade unions and their European umbrella organisations and federations, the detailed information to be supplied and the say which should correspondingly be accorded to them regarding personnel changes could to some extent be provided for under European transnational company agreements;
2013/07/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Urges the Commission, the Member States, and all other stakeholders not to treat the four pillars of the Action Plan as areas to be pursued separately, but rather to integrate the fourth pillar (‘Anticipating adaptation and managing restructuring’) into the other three as a cross-cutting task.
2013/07/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2013/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Notes that integration of the fourth pillar (‘Anticipating adaptation and managing restructuring’) into the other three, as regards changes in workforce size, structure, and skills requirements, could be factored into the restructuring process from the outset in the form of a holistic ‘social mainstreaming’ approach; notes that experience shows that such an approach, for the most part, produces speedier and better results for the stakeholders concerned.
2013/07/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU economies have a rather modest outlook for economic growth, on account of the severe austerity policy, which is to the detriment especially of consumer spending in the Member States, as well as a lack of investment, the EU economies have no immediate prospect of recovery;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas since the outbreak of the recent debt crisis, the structure of tax revenues has significantly changed, and the related structural and cyclical effects of this modification are hard to distinguish;deleted
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas, because of the debtfinancial crisis, the Member States are facing the difficult challenge of having to balance their budgets and promote economic growth at the same time;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the debt crisis has led to a financial and economicfinancial and economic crisis has led to a debt crisis and, at the same time, to the gradual slow-downsevere weakening of the EU economy;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the need to restore the credibility of budgetary policy, and reduce the sovereign debt, makes it necessary to reduce budget expenses, introduce structural reforms and, at the same time, to increase budget receipts, and thus some taxes, taking care to give priority to growth-oriented fiscal measures and to those taxes that are levied more on consumption than on labourprogressive in structure and are levied more on income and assets;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out, however, that a coordinated European floor rate for the taxation of profits, income and assets constitutes no impediment in this regard;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the optimal design of tax systems may depend on numerous factors and may differs therefore from country to country;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the healthy competition between different tax systems that exists in the Single Market, as this competition boosts, accelerates and stimulates the European economies;deleted
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 58 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that besidese importance of ensuring compliance with the sustainable fiscal policies, in order to achieve economic balance it is necessary to implement growth-conducive measures such as viable tax reductions.e. fiscal policies that adequately reflect burdens on society, in order to achieve economic balance;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 83 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that economic growth is basically generated by three factors: labour, capital and technological progress, and that taxation policy should be adjusted to these factors in the short, medium and long term;(Does not affect English version.)
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 87 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that taxation policy could operate in a new way based on a two-step model, designed with the aim of boosting the economy and creating new demands in the long term, whereby the first step would consist of tax reductions on export- oriented activities, and the second step of tax adjustments that stimulate job creationappropriate tax restructuring for environmentally and socially sustainable activities, and the second step of tax adjustments to promote social justice, i.e. the redistribution, via the tax system, of income and assets for the benefit of those currently disadvantaged;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 95 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Acknowledges that broadening already existing tax bases, rather thanas well as increasing tax rates or introducing new taxes, could generate further incomes for the Member States;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 97 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls that tax cutincreases should be based on a solid and carefully planned fiscal policy, accompanied by measures aimed at increasing growth and employment;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that is a need to create a so- called intelligent and coordinated EU- wide ‘tax-snake’ system, which raththere is a need in the long term than,o harmonisinge the different national tax systems coordinates them in a way that takes account of the cuts and increases made within each systemin order to counter tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 105 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that for the functioning of such a system, the framework of thean adjusted European Semester framework would be adequate, since – in tandem with other specific macroeconomic measures – it could keep good record of the various tax policies of the different Member States, taking fully into account the basic economic background, fundamentals and future perspectives of the Member States concerned;
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 121 #

2013/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that in countries where labour costs are high relative to productivity, and where the creation of jobs is therefore hindered, possible measures to reduce these costs or increase productivity could be examined;deleted
2013/03/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the need to develop an integrated concept of democratically- controlled economic development for the future which will include, build on and substantially supplement existing elements of industrial and service policy and structural and cohesion policy, thereby creating primarily social justice, good work and equivalent living conditions and developing a transformatory character in the form of social coexistence which is ready for reshaping;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals for a European cluster policy in the form of cooperation between connected companies, suppliers, service providers and research centres. Such policies have existed for a long time at regional and national level, but their strengths have so far only been promoted politically at this level. They have contributed to competition between economies (not only) at European level. The benefits to be gained from the joint use of resources and expertise for companies, employees and regions also at European level would be one way of promoting more balanced development of industry and trade;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Considers that in order to achieve this, there must be information on the strengths of the Member States, improved synergies between funding approaches at EU level which already exist and new approaches to be developed, and joint management of such development processes. Developing these according to social, employment-policy and sustainable criteria and not to austerity principles requires a different, democratically- controlled model of European economic governance – and the primacy of democratic politics;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the internal market still has enormous, untapped potential to boost competitiveness and qualitative growth in the EU, and therefore urges the Commission and the Member States to accelerate their efforts to remove remaining barriers, to the benefit of EU consumers, employees and companies, particularly SMEs; , in the EU;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that industrial policy should be guided by the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work in the same location’; believes that professional qualifications and fair wages are not exclusively matters of social policy, but are also preconditions for qualitative growth, innovation and investment;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 44 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Is convinced that there is great potential for economising and reallocating in the area of armaments and nuclear energy and therefore calls on the Commission to stop promoting armaments projects and research and research into and use of nuclear energy and use these for the benefit of environmentally- sustainable, social and peaceful industrial development;
2013/02/26
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Liquidation of a failing institution under normal insolvency proceedings could jeopardise financial stability, interrupt the provision of essential services, and affect the protection of depositors. In such a case there is a public interest in applying resolution tools. The objectives of resolution should therefore be to ensure the continuity of essential financial services, to maintain the stability of the financial system, to reduce moral hazard by minimising reliance on public financial support to failing institutions, and to protect depositors and to contribute to sustainable and balanced economic growth.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 157 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) However, the winding up of an insolvent institution through normal insolvency proceedings should always be considered before a decision could be taken to maintain the institution as a going concern. An insolvent institution shouldmay be maintained as a going concern for financial stability purposes and with the use, to the extent possible, of private funds. That may be achieved either through sale to or merger with a private sector purchaser, or after having written down the liabilities of the institution, or after having converted its debt to equity in order to do a recapitalisation.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 158 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) The current economic crisis was largely caused by the financial industry where many actors have become too-big- to fail and had to be bailed-out with public funds. In contrast to any market- economy logic, losses were socialised and profits privatised. It needs to be recalled that the key role of financial institutions is to channel savings into productive investments. With the invention of various toxic financial instruments and dubious business practices, which for example set exorbitantly high profit targets, this role has been squeezed out to the benefit of short-term profit maximisation with limited added value for the society. It is therefore imperative to reduce the financial sector to its core functions. Hence, institutions that have reached a size and level of interconnectedness which is likely to pose a systemic threat to the functioning of the economies of single Member States or the EU as a whole should be resolved as this will in the long term lead to more balanced and sustainable growth.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The limitations on the rights of shareholders and creditors should comply with Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The resolution tools should therefore be applied only to those institutions that are failing or likely to fail, and only when it is necessary to pursue the objective of financial stability in the general interest. In particular, resolution tools should be applied where the institution cannot be wound up under normal insolvency proceedings without destabilizing the financial system and the measures are necessary in order to en or to institutions that have reached a critical size, and only when it is necessary to pursure the rapid transfer and continuation of systemically important functions and where there is no reasonable prospect for any alternative private solution, including any increase of capital by the existing shareholders or by any third party sufficient to restore the full viability of the institutionobjective of financial stability and sustainable and balanced economic growth in the general interest.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 162 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Interference with property rights should not be disproportionate and should always be in line with the protection of the general public interest. As a consequence, affected shareholders and creditors should not incur greater losses than those which they would have incurred had the institution been wound up at the time that the resolution decision is taken. In the event of partial transfer of assets of an institution under resolution to a private purchaser or to a bridge institution, the residual part of the institution under resolution should be wound up under normal insolvency proceedings. In order to protect existing shareholders and creditors of the institution during the winding up proceedings, they should be entitled to receive in payment of their claims not less than what it is estimated they would have recovered if the whole institution had been wound up under normal insolvency proceedings.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)
(20a) 'critical size' means the size or interconnectedness of an entity referred to in Article 2 which has reached a level that is in times of crisis beyond the possibility of orderly resolution as any resolution action or orderly insolvency would lead to significant economic disruptions and therefore public bail-out and the socialisation of losses would become unavoidable.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 330 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The resolution plan shall provide for the resolution actions which the Commission and the Board may take where an entity referred to in Article 2 or a group meet the conditions for resolution. The resolution plan shall take into consideration a range of scenarios including that the event of failure may be idiosyncratic or may occur at a time of broader financial instability or of system wide events. The resolution plan shall not assume any extraordinary public financial support besides the use of the Fund established in accordance with this Regulation. Where this cannot be guaranteed because an entity has reached or is likely to reach a critical size, the board shall ensure that the entity adapts its business strategy accordingly so that in case of failure or crisis orderly resolution can be achieved.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 370 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. When drafting a resolution plan for entities referred to in Article 2, the Board shall assess the extent to which such an entity is resolvable in accordance with this Regulation. An entity shall be deemed resolvable if it is feasible and credible for the resolution authority to either liquidate it under normal insolvency proceedings or to resolve it by applying to it the different resolution tools and powers without giving rise to significant adverse consequences for financial systems, including circumstances of broader financial instability or system wide events, of the Member State in which the entity is situated, or other Member States, or the Union and with a view to ensuring the continuity of critical functions carried out by the entity. Entities which have reached a critical size as defined in Article 3 and which are deemed not to be resolvable with the existing tools referred to in Article 19 shall be restructured accordingly. In this case property rights shall be subordinated to the general public interest.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 415 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) to ensure the continuity of criticalbasic banking functions;
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 423 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) to protect depositors covered by Directive 94/19/EC and investors covered by Directive 97/9/EC21. __________________ 21 Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes. OJ L 084, 26.03.1997, p.22.;
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 424 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) to contribute to sustainable and balanced economic growth;
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 426 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
When pursuing the above objectives, the Commission and the Board shall seek to avoid the unnecessary destruction of value and to minimise the cominimise the cost of resolution and act in the overall general interest rather than in the interest of sharesholutionders and creditors.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 542 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. If allone of the conditions established in paragraph 2 areis met, the Board shall recommend to the Commission that the entity be placed under resolution. The recommendation shall include at least the following:
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 554 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6
6. Having regard to the urgency of the circumstances in the case, the Commission shall decide, on its own initiative or taking into account, if any, the communication referred to in paragraph 1 or the recommendation of the Board referred to in paragraph 5, whether or not to place the entity under resolution, and on the framework of the resolution tools that shall be applied in respect of the entity concerned and of the use of the Fund to support the resolution action. The Commission, on its own initiative, may decide to place an entity under resolution if all the conditions referred to in paragraph 2 are met.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 587 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a Resolution of systemic entities of a critical size 1. By way of derogation from Article 16 an entity or a group of entities referred to in Article 2 shall be deemed to be no longer viable if it has reached or is likely to reach a size and level of interconnectedness (critical size) that poses a threat to the economic stability of a single Member State or the Union as a whole. 2. EBA shall be empowered to specify criteria for the critical size of entities. It shall inter alia take into account the following factors: (a) size relative to national and EU GDP; (b) the total value of its assets; (b) leverage; (c) level of interconnectedness; (d) significance of cross-border activities. 3. Once an entity has been identified as having reached the critical size the relevant competent authority shall propose to the board the resolution of the relevant entities. 4. The board shall determine the appropriate resolution tools of Article 19 and the appropriate timeframe for resolution taking into account possible spill-over effects of its action. It shall cooperate closely with the ESRB.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 611 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, an entity referred to in Article 2 or a group shall be deemed to be no longer viable only if bothone of the following conditions areis met:
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 617 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission, upon a recommendation of the Board or on its own initiative, shall verify that the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are met. The Commission shall determine whether the powers to write down or convert capital instruments shall be exercised singly or, following the procedure under Article 16(4) to (7), together with a resolution action.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 627 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. Subject to paragraph 5, the resolution tools may be applied either separately or together, except for the asset separation tool which may be applied only together with another resolution tool.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 630 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. With regard to systemic entities of a critical size referred to in Art 16a (new) the board may apply either separately or together the resolution tools (a) to (c) of paragraph 2.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 634 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
The resolution scheme adopted by the Board under Article 16(8) shall establish, in compliance with the decisions of the Commission on the resolution framework under Article 16(6) and with any decision on State aid where applicable by analogy the details of the resolution tools to be applied to the institution under resolution concerning at least the measures referred to in Articles 21(2), 22(2), 23(2) and 24(1) and determine the specific amounts and purposes for which the Fund shall be used. The board shall ensure that resolution tools are applied proportionally. In line with current state aid rules issued by the European Commission on 10.07.2013 the bail-in tool shall always have preference over other resolution tools.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 663 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) liabilities to institutions, excluding entities that are part of the same group, with an original maturity of less than seven days;deleted
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 770 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a member appointed by the ECB;deleted
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 865 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 5
5. After hearing the Board, in its plenary session, the Commission shall propose a list of candidates to the Council and the European Parliament for the appointment of the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director. The Council shall appoint the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director after thearing approval of the European Parliament.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 922 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. In a period no longer than 10 years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the available financial means of the Fund shall reach at least 1% of the amount of total liabilities excluding own funds and covered deposits of all credit institutions authorised in the participating Member States which are guaranteed under Directive 94/19/EC.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Financing for projects, regarding transport infrastructure, sustainable energy generation or distribution, social infrastructure (housing or hospitals),he roll- out of new technologies and systems that reduce use of resources and energy or the further growth of SMEs, can be scarce. As the financial crisis has shown, complementing bank financing with a wider variety of financing sources that better mobilise capital markets could help tackle financing gaps. ELTIFs can play a crucial role in this respect.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 84 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to ensure that ELTIFs target long-term investments, rules on the portfolio of ELTIFs should require a clear identification of the categories of assets that should be eligible for investment by ELTIFs and of the conditions under which they should be eligible. An ELTIF should invest at least 790% of its capital in eligible investment assets. To ensure the integrity of ELTIFs it is also desirable to prohibit an ELTIF from engaging in certain financial transactions that might endanger its investment strategy and objectives by raising additional risks different to those that might be expected for a fund targeting long-term investments. In order to ensure a clear focus on long term investments, as may be useful for retail investors unfamiliar with less conventional investment strategies, an ELTIF should not be allowed to invest in financial derivative instruments other than for the purpose of hedging the duration and currency risk of the other assets. Given the liquid nature of commodities and financial derivative instruments that give an indirect exposure to them, investments in commodities do not require a long-term investor commitment and therefore should be excluded. This rationale does not apply to investments in infrastructure or companies related to commodities or whose performance is linked indirectly to the performance of commodities, such as farms in the case of agricultural commodities or power plants in the case of energy commodities.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The definition of what constitutes a long-term investment is broad. Without necessarily requiring long-term holding periods for the ELTIF manager, eEligible investment assets are generally illiquid, require commitments for a certain period of time, and have an economic profile of a long-term nature. Eligible investment assets are non-transferable securities and therefore do not have access to the liquidity of secondary markets. They often require fixed term commitments which restrict their marketability. The economic cycle of the investment sought by ELTIFs is essentially of a long-term nature due to the high capital commitments and the length of time required to produce returns. As a result such assets do not suit investments with redemption rights.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 91 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) An ELTIF should be allowed to invest in assets other than eligible investment assets, as may be necessary to efficiently manage its cash flow, but only so long as this is consistent with the ELTIF’s long term investment strategy.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Eligible investment assets must be understood to include participations, such as equity or quasi-equity instruments, debt instruments in qualifying portfolio undertakings and loans provided to them. They should also include participation in other funds that are focused on assets such as investments in non-listed undertakings that issue equity or debt instruments for which there is not always a readily identifiable buyer. Direct holdings of real assets, unless they are securitised, should also form a class of eligible assets.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 94 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Quasi-equity instruments must be understood to comprise a type of financing instrument, which is a combination of equity and debt, where the return on the instrument is linked to the profit or loss of the qualifying portfolio undertaking, and where the repayment of the instrument in the event of default is not fully secured. Such instruments include a variety of financing instruments such as subordinated loans, silent participations, participating loans, profit participating rights, convertible bonds and bonds with warrants.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Due to the scale of infrastructure projects, these require large amounts of capital that have to remain invested for long periods of time. Such infrastructure projects include public building infrastructure such as schools, hospitals or prisons, social infrastructure such as social housing, transport infrastructure such as roads, mass transit systems or airports, energy infrastructure such as energy grids, climate adaptation and mitigation projects, power plants or pipelines, water management infrastructure such as water supply systems, sewage or irrigation systems, communication infrastructure such as networks and waste management infrastructure such as recycling or collection systems.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 108 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) In order to allow managers of ELTIFs a certain degree of flexibility in the investment of their funds, trading in assets other than long-term investments should be permitted up to a maximum threshold of 30 % of their capital.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In order to limit risk-taking by ELTIFs it is essential to reduce counterparty risk by subjecting the portfolio of ELTIFs to clear diversification requirements. All over-the counter (OTC) derivatives should be subject to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories9. __________________ 9 OJ L 201. 27.7.2012. p.1deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 113 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Notwithstanding the fact that ELTIFs do not offer redemption rights before the end of life of the ELTIF, nothing should prevent an ELTIF from seeking admission of these shares or units to a regulated market as defined in Article 4(14) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments10, to a multilateral trading facility as defined in Article 4(15) of Directive 2004/39/EC, or to an organised trading facility as defined in point (…) of Regulation (…), thus providing investors with an opportunity to sell their units or shares before the end of life of the ELTIF. The rules or instruments of incorporation of an ELTIF should therefore not prevent units or shares from being admitted to or from being dealt in regulated markets, nor should they prevent investors from freely transferring their shares or units to third parties who wish to purchase those shares or units. __________________ 10deleted OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1 .
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 152 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(p) assets referred to in Article 50(1) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council18. __________________ 18deleted OJ L 302, 17.11.09, p. 1.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 158 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(t) using financial derivative instruments, except where the underlying instrument consists of interest rates or currencies and it solely serves the purpose of hedging the duration and exchange risks inherent to other investments of the ELTIF.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) in the case of a long-term investment of more than 10 years’ duration in assets which do not contravene the objectives of the EU and which promote sustainable environmental and social economies.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 162 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(c) debt instruments issued by a qualifying portfolio undertaking;deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 164 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(d) loans granted by the ELTIF to a qualifying portfolio undertaking;deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 178 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) it shall be established in a Member State, or in a third country provided that the third country:.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 179 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
i) is not a high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF);deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 180 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
ii) has signed an agreement with the home Member State of the manager of the ELTIF and with every other Member State in which the units or shares of the ELTIF are intended to be marketed to ensure that the third country fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 184 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
An ELTIF shall not invest in an eligible investment asset in which the manager has or takes a direct or indirect interest, other than by holding units or shares of the ELTIF it manages.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 189 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
(1) An ELTIF shall invest at least 790% of its capital in eligible investment assets.
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(g) 5% of its capital in assets referred to in Article 8(1)(b) where those assets have been issued by any single body.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 199 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
(4) The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from over the counter (OTC) derivative transactions or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 5% of its capital.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
(2) The concentration limits laid down in Article 56(2) of Directive 2009/65/EC shall apply to investments in the assets referred to in Article 8(1)(b) of this Regulation.deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #

2013/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
(1) The ELTIF rules or instrument of incorporation shall not prevent units or shares of an ELTIF from being admitted to trading on a regulated market as defined in Article 4(14) of Directive 2004/39/EC or on a multilateral trading facility as defined in Article 4(15) of Directive 2004/39/EC or on an organised trading facility as defined in point (…) of Regulation (…).deleted
2013/12/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The free movement of workers is also a key element to the development of a genuine Union labour market, allowing workers to move from high unemployment areas to areas where there are labour shortages, helping more people find posts better suited to their skills and overcoming bottlenecks in the labour market.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Voluntary mobility within the Union should be fostered. Freedom of movement for workers should not, however, lead to a brain drain prompted by a lack of employment prospects in a given country of origin. A brain drain of this kind is no long-term solution to crises and mass unemployment.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The free movement of workers gives every citizen the right to move freely to another Member State to work and reside there for that purpose. It protects them against discrimination on the grounds of nationality as regards employment, remuneration and other working conditions by ensuring their equal treatment in comparison to nationals of that Member State. It needs to be distinguished from the freedom to provide services, which includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, for which they may send (‘post’) their own workers to another Member State temporarily to carry out the work necessary to provide these services thereFrontier workers whose place of work and place of residence are located in different Member States should also be protected against discrimination.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) However, the effective exercise of the freedom of movement of workers is still a major challenge and many workers are very often unaware of their rights to free movement. They and frontier workers still suffer from discrimination on the grounds of nationality when moving across European Union borders of the Member States. There is, therefore, a gap between the legislation and its application in practice that needs to be addressed.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should promote dialogue with the social partners and non- governmental organisations and between social partners to address and combat different forms of discrimination on the grounds of nationality.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Member States should make information about employment terms and conditions and all relevant information about housing, health insurance, tax relief and welfare benefits more widely available to workers from other Member States, to employers and to other interested parties in all the languages required.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably freedom of assembly and of association (Article 12), the freedom to choose an occupation and the right to engage in work (Article 15), the right to non-discrimination (Article 21 and in particular Paragraph 2 concerning non- discrimination on the grounds of nationality), the right to collective bargaining and action (Article 28), fair and just working conditions (Article 31the right to protection in the event of unjust dismissal (Article 30), the right to fair and just working conditions (Article 31), the right to social security and social assistance (Article 34), the right to freedom of movement and residence (Article 45) and the right to an effective remedy and a fair trial (Article 47). It has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) access to social security;
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) membership of trade unions and collective bargaining and collective measures;
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) access to training and further training;
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that judicial and/or administrative procedures, including where they deem it appropriate, conciliation procedures, for the enforcement of the obligations under Article 45 of the Treaty and Articles 1 to 10 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, are available to all workers, including frontier workers, and members of their families who consider they have suffered or are suffering from unjustified restrictions to their right to free movement or consider themselves wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment to them, even after the relationship in which the discrimination is alleged to have occurred has ended. Member States shall ensure that employers do not prevent workers from exercising their rights in the context of judicial and/or administrative procedures of this kind.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that associations, trade unions, organisations or other legal entities, which have, in accordance with the criteria laid down by their national law, a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions of this Directive are complied with, may engage, either on behalf of or in support of the worker and members of his/her family, if appropriate with his/her approval, in any judicial and/or administrative procedure provided for the enforcement of rights under Article 45 of the Treaty and Articles 1 to 10 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that existing or newly created bodies, including those set up by trade unions and NGOs, are aware, make use of and co-operate with the existing information and assistance services at Union level, such as Your Europe, SOLVIT, EURES, Enterprise Europe Network and the Points of Single Contact.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide in several languages clear, easily accessible, comprehensive and up- to-date information on the rights conferred by the Union law on free movement of workers. This information should also be easily accessible through Your Europe and EURES. This shall apply to both the Member State of origin and the Member State in which the worker is employed.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to prevent national, regional and local authorities, non-EU countries and EU companies that breach EU tax standards from receiving state aid and EU funding of all types; calls on the Commission furthermore to deny non-EU countries and companies that breach EU tax standards access to the internal market;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 95 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on Member States to commit to an ambitious but realistic target of halveliminating the tax gap by 2020, since this would gradually generate newsignificantly higher tax revenue without raising tax rates;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Urges Member States to allocate adequate resources to their national tax administrations and tax audit staff;Does not affect the English version.
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 133 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on Member States to revoke the banking licensces of financial institutions if they actively assist in tax fraud by offering products or services to customers enabling them to evade taxes or refuse to cooperate with tax authorities;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Urges the Commission to compile and create a public European blacklist of tax havens; calls on Member States to suspend or terminate existing Double Tax Conventions with jurisdictions that are on the blacklist, and to initiate Double Tax Conventions with jurisdictions that cease to be tax havens; these measures should be complemented by sanctions for companies that continue to conduct operations involving entities belonging to those jurisdictions including a ban on state and EU aids and public contracts;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 229 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Calls on the Member States – where they have not already done so – to switch consistently from the exemption to the imputation method of preventing international double taxation;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 b (new)
31b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to debar banking institutions based in non-cooperative States from the European capital market and to secure the abolition of exemptions from taxation at source for individuals who are non-resident for tax purposes in these States;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 232 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 c (new)
31c. Calls on the Commission and Member States, via the respective supervisory authorities, to deny European financial institutions which maintain branches in non-cooperative States licences to operate in Europe or to strip them thereof;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 233 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 d (new)
31d. Calls on the Commission to amend the Savings Directive in such a way that in future it applies to all forms of financial investment and investment income accruing to both natural and legal persons and no longer permits any exceptions to the automatic exchange of information;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 234 #

2013/0000(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 e (new)
31e. Calls on Member States to levy a 50% withholding tax on dividends, interest and royalties originating in Member States and accruing to beneficiaries in non- cooperative countries;
2013/03/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Commission's Expert Group on transnational company agreements, 31 January 2012,
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Document of the Commission's Expert Group on transnational company agreements, 31 January 2012,
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
transnational company agreements has increased significantly and whereas this indicates that labour relations in Europe are becoming increasingly integrated;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas each EU Member State has its own system of relations between social partnerindustrial relations, based on different historical developments and traditions, which has to be respected and does not require harmonisation;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
with European transnational company agreements concluded by European trade union federations and European employers or employers’ federations, generally at sectoral level, and that the resolution does not concern international transnational company agreements (ITCA) signed by international trade union federations with undertakings;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
optional European legal framework should be adopted for these European transnational company agreements;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
transnational company agreements
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
their basis an optional European legal framework in order, even before negotiations at European level, to eliminate certain potential problems at source and in order to have their attention drawn to regulatory solutions which have proved useful and effective;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
optional legal framework should be optional for the social partners;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
trade union federations to negotiate and conclude only European transnational company agreements; observes that, if a European trade union federation has not agreed any internal procedure for issuing a negotiating mandate, agreements may only be concluded by representative national trade unions; considers that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
favourable clause and the non-regression clause in order to avert the danger that a European transnational company agreement might result in evasion of national collective agreements and national company agreements, or impair them;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
dispute settlement procedures; considers that, in European transnational company agreements, a first ad hoc contact point at undertaking level should be agreed in order to bring about solutions to conflicts between the contracting parties;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
fundamental criteria for European transnational company agreements which the negotiating parties should discuss and whose outcome they should record in writing in order to prevent problems of subsequent interpretation and application; notes that the following points, in particular, should be covered: the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the legitimacy and representativeness of the negotiating parties between which agreements are concluded, the place and date of conclusion of an agreement, substantive and geographical scope, the most favourable clause and the non- regression clause, the period of validity, the preconditions for denouncing the agreement and the dispute settlement procedures;
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 9 October 2008 on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, including child poverty, in the EU1, __________________ 1 OJ C 9E, 15.1.2010, p. 11.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the provision and regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income which maintains standards of living is the sole responsibility of the Member States in question and that the Commission should, where appropriate, encourage the Member States to look critically at their systems and engage in exchanges of experience;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A – indent 1
- the sheer gravity of the pension challenge presented by an ageing population, a challenge severely aggravated by the financial and economic crisis;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A – indent 4
- the moral obligation of the Member States to guarantee public (first-pillar) pensions which guarantee an adequate standard of living - if needed, complemented by minimum income provisions - to provide a decent income at least above the poverty line for all citizens;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A – indent 6
- the need to consider linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy while at the same time enablingenable workers to lead longer, healthier working lives with a view to extending working careersso that they can continue working until the statutory retirement age;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on those Member States which are lagging behind to make their systems demographically sound as soon as possibleto bring their systems into line with the requirements of a pension which maintains the standard of living and, in doing so, to place the emphasis on the 1st pillar, which must provide adequate and secure pensions with a broad financial basis, in accordance with productivity trends;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A – indent 10
- the importance for Member States to take concrete steps to implement the EU 2020 strategy, as raisingncrease employment, productivity and inclusive economic growth, is imperativen order to attaining adequate and sustainable pensions;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the worst financial and economic crisis in decades has turned into an acute sovereign debt crisis that hascurrent austerity policy is an attempt to resolve the worst financial and economic crisis in decades, one which has put a serious strain on public finances and severely affected the pension incomes of millions of EU citizens;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers that the Commission and Member States should pursue a different strategy with regard to retirement age, which should initially lead to a general rise in employment rates, broaden the financial basis of pension systems and above all bring about greater participation of higher incomes in pay-as-you-go and tax-financed systems in the 1st pillar and gear adjustments in pensions to the development of productivity;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the first cohort of the so-called ‘baby boom generation’ has reached pensionable age, causing the demographic challenge to no longer be a future challenge but today’s reality, causing the number of people aged 60+ to increase by more than 2 million per year – double the amoundemographic change is a long- term process which the highly developed industrialised societies have for decades been offsetting by means of higher productivity; whereas, for example, in Germany in 1900 there were 12 workers for every one retired person, but whereas in 2000 this ratio had gone down to four workers for every one retired person and it ais compared to previous decadesexpected to diminish further to two workers for every one retired person by 2040-2050;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the demographic indicators used to determine whether pension systems are viable are much less important than is generally claimed: for example, between 1950 and 1990 in West Germany real GDP increased by 473 %, whilst over the same period the number of people in employment rose by only 42 %, meaning that only 9 % of the increase in production over that period could be accounted for by ‘demographic factors’, whilst the increase in the real capital stock, productivity, etc. made up the remaining 91 %; whereas, therefore, the decisive factor determining the ‘sustainability of pensions’ is ‘economic’, not ‘demographic’, in nature;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas even set apart from the economic crisis, long-term demographic and productivity trends point to a low- growth economic scenario for Europe, withand whereas if the current austerity policies are continued economic growth rates significantlycould be lower than those attained during previous decades;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, according to the Commission and leading economists, maintaining average annual labour productivity growth of 1.1% to1.4%, as in recent decades, is key to safeguarding the sustainability of pension systems; whereas further productivity reserves could be mobilised by increasing energy and resource efficiency (factor 4 by 2020-2025 and factor 10 by 2050); whereas such overall productivity growth can make it possible for value added to go on increasing despite a diminishing workforce, and can provide a sound basis for a fair redistribution of revenues between economically active and non- active persons (such as pensioners, children, schoolchildren, students, etc.);
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that 2nd pillar systems must be secure and transparent as regards costs and risks to society as a whole and to the individual, for the sake of employees;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 38 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas rising unemployment has hurt pay-as-you-go pension schemes, while funded systems are hit by disappointingas a result of normal stock market fluctuations, crashes and/or the financial and economic crisis funded systems are hit by losses of their entire capital or unpredictable financial markets returns;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas in its Green Paper the Commission partially admitted the failings of funded schemes when acknowledging that ‘the return rates and solvency of funded schemes have been affected through falls in interest rates and asset values: private pension funds lost over 20% of their value during 2008’, that ‘many still remain far off the required solvency levels’ and that, moreover, ‘several sponsors of occupational pension funds were hindered in their ability to honour their obligations’;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas it has become clear that the concept of a three-pillar pension system, as called for by the EU, the IMF and the World Bank, consisting of a scaled-down first pillar comprising state schemes which guarantee only a basic pension, a second pillar comprising funded occupational pension schemes, and a third pillar based on private pension provision, does not work, a state of affairs which undermines the security and adequacy of pension provision as a whole, and whereas the financial and economic crisis has rendered meaningless the asset growth projections of fund models linked to this concept;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. RejExpects regulatory harmonisation of quantitative or qualitative precautionary measures at EU level, which should render transparent the costs and risks of the 2nd and 3rd pillars to society as a whole and to the individual and should have the aim of safeguarding the accumulated entitlements of employees;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that a Commission proposalsDirective regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures are onlywould be of value if ithey lays stress on taking into account the differences between the systems and comply strictlyies with the principle of proportionality in terms of the financial, administrative and technical burden involved in contrast with costs and risks to society as a whole and to the individual;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 58 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Considers with regard to qualitative precautionary measures that proposals concerning corporate governance and risk management and those regarding transparency and information disclosure obligations are useful;Does not affect the English version.
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Is strongly opposed to Europe-wide harmonised requirements concerning own capital or evaluation; rejectFavours any review of the Pension Funds Directive (the IORP Directive) which aims to achieve thiimprove transparency and information and the protection of entitlements arising from occupational pension schemes;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission’s White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and if possible private pension savings, if current austerity policies are maintained, the likelihood of a medium-term, low growth scenario;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. StressObserves that the application of quantitative Solvency II requirements poses a greatpossible risk to pillar 2 systems, since these may, as a result of increased costs, be forced in future to accept lower company pensions or to stop them altogether; emphasises that this is not in the interests of employees; therefore concludes that there must be no provisions at EU level aiming to apply Solvency II to 2nd pillar systems are inappropriate where the latter are not financial service providers and/or based on the capital market, and can therefore not be compared with 3rd pillar systems; nonetheless considers that better minimum requirements should apply to 2nd pillar systems with regard to the security of contributions which have been paid, minimum yields and transparency and portability;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
15. Considers proposals for the further development of variations to Solvency II, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet Model (HBS), to be useful onlyas components of EU- level regulations if specific national requirements are complied with and if they are presented as recommendations; categorically rejects these as components of EU-level regulations;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 83 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforbring their systems into their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other impline with the requirements of a pension which maintains the standard of living and, in doing so, to place the emphasis on the first pillar, which must provide adequate and secure pensions with a broad financial basis, in accortdant government spendingce with productivity trends; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillar pensions - if necessary complemented by minimum income provisions - to provide a decent minimum income; maintain the standard of living and at least to provide a decent minimum income; __________________ 1 EP resolution of 9 October 2008 on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, including child poverty, in the EU (OJ C 9E, 15.1.2010, p. 11.)
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
16. Rejects the establishment of equal competition between life insurance and 2nd pillar systems, aunless the latter are not financial service providers and/or based on the capital market, and can therefore not be compared with life insurance provider3rd pillar systems;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 93 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 18
18. Believes it would make sense for the Commission to have an overview of national guarantee schemes and measures and, to propose reliable procedures for simple, cost-effective and proportionate procedures, to draw attention to risks in the systems and to formulate effective and adequate European minimum requirements applicable to these systems;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 103 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that, according to the OECD, there iwas a lack of mobility between the Member States until 2010 and that only 3% of working-age EU citizens were liveing in another Member State;* assumes, however, that there will be a further massive increase in mobility as a result of the financial and economic crisis; * OECD (2012), ‘Mobility and migration in Europe’, p. 63. In: OECD Economic Surveys: European Union 2012, OECD Publishing.
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 105 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Observes that the financial and economic crisis has revealed the vulnerability of both funded and pay-as- you-go pension schemes in particular; recommends multi-pillar pension systems, consisting of at least:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses therefore that cross-border pension tracking services are only worthwhile if they are extremely efficient, legally and administratively small-scale and highly cost-effectiveeffective and proportionately cost-effective with reference to transparency and added value to employees;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 114 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that maintaining appropriate provision in the 1st pillar, with its spirit of solidarity, should be the number one priority in the Member States and that the 3rd pillar can play a supplementary role as the demographic pressure decreases; rejects the reduction of the 1st pillar and a corresponding increase in the; rejects all measures which detract from the 1st pillar in favour of the 2nd or 3rd pillar;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 114 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point i
i. a public, first- pillar, decent minimum pension pension which guarantees an adequate standard of living;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 26
26. Regrets that 3rd pillar systems can b, in particular, are as a rule more cost- intensive, more risky and less transparent than 1st and 2nd pillar systems; pillar; calls for stability, reliability and sustainability for the 3rd pillar;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 27
27. Notes that in some Member States, 3rd pillar pensions, 2nd and 3rd pillar pensions are available only to people who are employed by thriving or large undertaking or whose income is sufficient for them to pay contributions; calls therefore for the acceptance of people with low or mid- range incomes ina concentration on developing the 3rd1st pillar, and for their access to that pillar, to be reinforced in a secure and sustainable manner which maintains standards of living;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 117 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 29
29. Recalls, with regard to Initiative 9, the need for unconditional adherence to the principle of subsidiarity;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 119 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 30
30. Regards an evaluation of reliable procedures and proposals to optimise incentives as worthwhile;deleted
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 122 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission to investigate the vulnerability of 3rd pillar systems to crises and to put forward proposals to reduce the risk;Does not affect the English version.
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 123 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 32
32. Recommends that the legal cost limits at national level for contract conclusion and management, change of provider or change of contract type be investigated and that proposals be made in this regard;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 33
33. Rejects the notion of voluntaCalls for compulsory codes of conduct with regard to quality, information provision to consumers and consumer protection in the 3rd pillar and urges the Member StatesCommission to assume regulatory tasks in these areas;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 126 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point ii
ii. a fundeda supplementary, employment-related, mandatory collective second-pillar pension, preferably governed by (sectoral) social partners;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 37
37. Calls on the Commission to involve social partners in an appropriate way by means of the structures available on an equal footing;
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 132 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point iii
iii. an individual third-pillar pension based on private savings;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
calls on the Member States to consider introducing such or comparable schemes where they do not yet exist; calls on the Commission to ensure any existing or future regulation in the field of pensions to be conducive to multi-pillar pension schemes;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the importance of pension funds as substantial and reliable long- term investors in the EU economy; emphasises their significance for achieving the Europe 2020 strategy’s headline targets concerning economic growth, more and better jobs and attaining socially inclusive societies; urges the Commission not to jeopardise the investment potential of pension funds when introducing or changing EU regulations, especially when reviewing the directive on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge, taking into account the need to continue to work for longer while at the same time preserving one's health, to adapt working conditions and lifelong learning so as to enable people to work lonuntil they reach the statutory retirement ager, consensus between governments and social partners is paramount;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. WelcomesRejects, for the reasons adduced, the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: balancing time spent in work and retirement; developing complementary occupational and private pension savings, and enhancing the EU’s pension monitoring tools;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having people work more and longer is the only feasible way to generate the tax Considers that the Commission and Member States should pursue a different strategy with regard to retirevmenues and social and pension premiums needed to consolidate Member State budgets and to fund adequt age, which should initially lead to a general rise in employment rates, safe and sustainable pension schemes; points to the risk of part-time work leading to only partial pension entitlements; calls on the Member States to put funds aside to combat the risbroaden the financial basis of pension systems and above all bring about greater participation of higher incomes in pay-as-you-go and tax-financed systems in the 1st pillar and gear adjustments ing public costs of the retiring populationensions to the development of productivity;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the acceleration of the pressure posed by demographic developments on national budgets and pension systems now that the first cohorts of the ‘baby boom generation’ retire; nNotes the uneven progress and levels of ambition across Member States in formulating and implementing structural reforms aimed at raising employment, phasing out early retirement schemes and putting both the statutory and effective retirement age on a sustainable footing with increases in life expectancy; stresses that Member States that fail to implement gradual reforms now may at a later stage find themselves in a scenario where they have to implement reforms shock-wise and with significant social consequences;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasizes that a general rise in the statutory retirement age and an extension of obligatory contribution periods are not necessary at all; considers that - while maintaining the current overall level of employers’ contributions - a return to parity financing of statutory pension schemes (at least 50 % of contributions to be paid by the employer) would allow most Member States to maintain or return to a statutory retirement age of 60;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on Member States with first- pillar pay-as-you-go systems to base their statutory pension systems more on solidarity and redistribution by extending the contributory base to the self-employed, civil servants, etc. and at the same time abolishing the ceilings on contributions which exist in some Member States; considers that the contributory base of statutory pension systems could be further broadened by making obligatory contributions from all types of revenue – including, for example, rents and interest payments;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates the call for closely linking pension benefits to years worked and premiums paid (‘actuarial fairness’), to ensure that working more and longer pays off for workers by having a better pension; recommends that the Member States, in consultation with social partners, allow individual workers, on a voluntary basis, to continue working after the statutory retirement age, as extending the period of premiums paid while at the same time shortening the period of benefit eligibility can help workers reduce any pension gaps at a fast pacobserves, however, that this does not, conversely, imply any restriction with regard to its call for decent minimum resources in old age;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that the assumption behind early retirement schemes, whereby older workers are allowed to reConsiders that work organisation and working time arrangements must be adapted to demographic change; points out that improved stability of employment, shorter collectirve early so as to make jobs available for the young, has been proven empirically wrong as the Member States displaying the highest youth employment rates, on average, are also the ones displaying the higweekly working time, social security and health and safety at the work place are necessary to enable a better integration of young and older workers alike to keep them in gainful employment, motivated and healthy until they reach the st employment rates for older workersatutory retirement age;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work lonuntil they reach the statutory retirement ager; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that the Council and the Commission must come forward with a European Youth Employment Guarantee securing the right of every young person in the EU to be offered a suitable well- paid job in line with their qualifications and skills, an apprenticeship, additional training or combined work and training, within three months of becoming unemployed, thus also improving the scope for young people to build up proper pension entitlements;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Council to agree on an EU target for minimum wages (statutory or based on national, regional or sectoral agreements on terms of employment), which should ensure that employees are paid at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average wage so that more employees can acquire individual pension entitlements which will keep them above the poverty line;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Council also to agree on a guarantee of a minimum pension (retirement pension, disability pension, etc.) above the Union’s at-risk-of-poverty threshold of 60% of the national equalised median income in order to prevent poverty in old age;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective mandatory occupational pension savings, as collective (second pillar) pension systems - usually governed by (sectoral) social partners - allow for solidarity within and between generations, whereas individual schemes do not; stresses the need to start building up complementary occupational pension systems now, despite the crisis;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the low operating costs of (sector wide) collective not-for-profit occupational pension schemes, as compared to individual pension savings schemes; emphasises the importance of low operating costs as even limited cost reductions can yield substantially higher pensions;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas ouran effective single market is the highwith adequate social protection arrangements can be one way out of the crisis;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas a more competitive services market is necessary for European industry;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 13 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Services Directive has both brought concrete benefitbenefits and displayed shortcomings since its adoption in 2006, facilitating market access for both business and consumers;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 18 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the time has come to act, given that, with rising unemployment, the services sector is more than ever a source of competitiveness, growth and jobs that cannot be neglected;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 21 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that red tape, and discriminatory practices and restrictionsrelating to service provision across the EU are depriving citizens of jobs;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the EU could make a GDP gain of 2.6% in 5-10 years if Member States were ready to implement the Services Directive properly and fully and remove unnecessary restrictionsdifficulties with the Services Directive relating to conflicts with social rights were eliminated and the Member States then implemented the Services Directive properly;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that effective enforcement of existing rules is a smart and fast way of creating growth without public spending; underlines the urgent need to make the directive work in practice and, where appropriate, to improve it where conflicts with employees’ social protection rights arise;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the Services Directive doesmust not force liberalisation but paves the way for both business and consumers to grasp the full potential of ourthe single market without restricting social protection rights and employees’ rights;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that Member States are often using overriding reasons of public interest (Article15 of the Services Directive) to protect and favour their domestic market; hHighlights the fact that burdensome legal- form and shareholder requirements, territorial restrictions, economic needs tests and fixed tariffs create unjustified obstacles to cross-border establishment;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the diversity of national standards is causing fragmentation; encourages the development of voluntary European standards for services to improve cross- border comparability;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Points out that inadequate implementation has a ‘borderless’ impact, with citizens across the EU paying the price; eEmphasises that all Member States have a responsibility vis-à-vis one another and the Union to effectively enforce the directive and should be confronted with their obligations on an equal footing;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that competent regional and local authorities must also take their shared responsibility for full and qualitative enforcement beyond the letter of the directive, with the overall aim of stimulating economic activity and creating employment which provides social protection and enables employees to subsist independently;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights the fact that overriding reasons of public interest are too often invoked in a way that damages the internal market for services; regrets that the proportionality assessment is rarely made; aAsks the Commission to clarify the concept of proportionality and issue practical guidance to the Member States on how to apply it;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Strongly supports the Commission’s zero tolerance policy; eEncourages the Commission to make use of all means at its disposal to ensure full enforcement of existing rules, in dialogue with Member States; calls for fast-track infringement procedures to be applied whenever breaches of the directive are identified;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Asks the Commission, on the basis of the outcome of the peer reviews, to list the most burdensomeconspicuous restrictions, propose targeted reforms and instances of discrimination and conflict with social protection rights, propose targeted reforms of the Directive in this regard and keep the Council and Parliament informed;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2012/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the members of the European Council to take full political responsibility for a well functioning internal market for services; invites President Van Rompuy to keep this topic on the European Council’s agenda for as long as it takes, with a commonly agreed roadmap, including specific benchmarks and a timetable for Member States to remosolve remaining hurdproblems;
2013/05/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission communication and uUnderlines the need for concrete policy proposals; believes that it is crucial to agree on the direction of the Union’s long- term policy in the interest of predictability for industry and society;
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the crucial importance of timely, correct and full implementation adjustment of existing legislation, including the regulatory work called for by the Third Internal Energy Market Package, in order to achieve, by 2014, an integrated and competitive European internal energy market by 2014focusing on security of supply at socially acceptable prices;
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that an open, transparent, and integrated and competitive internal energy market is needed in order to achieve competitivsocially acceptable energy prices, security of supply, sustainability and efficient large- scale deployment of renewable energy, and that the completion of such a market still remains an important challenge for all Member States; welcomes the liberalisation of the internal energy market as a necessary step to cut the cost of electricity and gas for consumers while ensuring that the energy markets become more transparent and better monitored;
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to the Energy Policy for Europe, which recognises the potential contribution of nuclear power in the areas of competitiveness, cost efficiency, CO2 emission reduction and security of supply; points out that nuclear energy technologies have a potential to meet energy and climate objectives in both the short and longer term;deleted
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 31 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges that instruments such as energy taxes, and carbon taxes, and emission trading schemes are key drivers to reach the emission reduction targets in a cost-n efficient way, but considers that they will burden the consumers with higher energy prices in the end; is furthermore of the opinion that regulation through levies and taxes should be focused more on large industrial users rather than on private consumers;
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 38 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that it should be made clear what can be done through energy policy andis also social policy respectively; believes that the issue of poverty is best dealt with by social policy and not through regulation of energycan be combated as part of energy policy, too, in that non-profit public energy utilities subject to democratic oversight can best guarantee socially acceptable prices.;
2012/11/07
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the crisis which began in 2008global economic crisis which was triggered in 2008 and has been significantly worsened by financial speculation in the financial sector has served to speed up the rate of change sharply; whereas it has added to the structural pressures to adapt to change resulting from globalisation's more immediate constraints which subject undertakings, workers, territories and governments to critical tensions;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas as a result of radical changes in economic strategies the last 30 years have seen a massive shift in wealth from the real to the financial economy; whereas the resulting shrinkage in the role of the State has led to chronic underfunding, indebtedness, pressure on the public authorities to privatise and cuts in jobs and services at all levels; whereas restructuring in the private sector is often used as a pretext for redundancies in an effort to boost share prices; and whereas the situation of those who create all the goods and provide all the services, but bear the full brunt of the economic crisis, needs to be improved;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas all the Member States in which relatively few workers have been made redundant since the start of the crisis have very well developed industrial relations systems under which workers and their representatives have relatively many rights in the areas of consultation, information and codetermination, arrangements which have led to joint agreements being concluded at works level on the basis of laws and collective agreements;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas, as stated in the Annual Growth Survey: advancing the Union’s comprehensive response to the crisis, "the positive export performance of some Member States shows that success in global markets relies on wider factors such as sector specialisation, innovation, and skills levels that enhance real competitiveness"; whereas against the specific background of the crisis undertakings in some Member States have made every effort to retain their well- trained and highly experienced workers;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas EU undertakings cannot hope to be successful on world markets simply by undercutting their competitors’ prices, but instead only by developing good products, processes and services, which in turn makes a good education system, good training and further training for workers, good working conditions and welfare systems and sufficient investment in research and development essential;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the fact that during the crisis successful industrial undertakings in the EU which do well on export markets have tried to retain their well-trained and highly experienced workers shows that the Commission’s flexicurity approach, based on short-term employment contracts, has failed and does not meet the requirements of firms which are competitive on world markets; whereas precisely the same can be said of the measures in the 'employment package', which is based on reduced protection against dismissal and the downgrading of other rights for employees with open-ended contracts, even though successful firms take a long- term approach, want to keep their workers and are suffering from a skills shortage in certain areas;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas there is a danger that the good practices identified in the wake of the crisis, in particular by the ILO, will be largely disregarded and not used to address future crises; whereas, therefore, the EU institutions should investigate and document the practices in question, so that they can also be used when restructuring is carried out; whereas in some Member States redundancies have not been used as a means of addressing the crisis and time not taken up by work has been set aside for further training;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) The new focus of economic governance is the consolidation of state budgets, so that restrictions on public spending are jeopardising measures to cushion the adverse impact of restructuring operations.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 2, paragraph 2
2. The present Directive covers restructuring operations affecting at least 100 employees in a single company or 500 employees in a company and its dependent companies in one or more Member States over a period of three months.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 2, paragraph 2
2. To that end, companies and employees' representatives, when dealing with restructuring, in a spirit of cooperation, shall recognise that these processes aim to protect both the interests of companies as regards competitiveness and sustainability, and those of their employees as regards social security and the long-term safeguarding of jobs.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 3, paragraph 1, point a
a) "companies" mean national and international companies and groups of companies employing at least 500 employees in the Union, as well as any company part of the group referred to above;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 4, paragraph 1
1. Any restructuring operation shallmust be integrated into a long-term strategy that aims to ensure and strengthening the long- term sustainability and competitiveness of the company and job security.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2012/2061(INI)

2. Long-term strategic planning shall include human resources, employment and skills objectives that focus on developing, on a permanent basis, the skills and competences of the workforce in order to increase the competitiveness of the company and its capacity of adaptation, as well as to increase the employabilityfacilitate transfers of employees and to managecreate scope for their internal and external mobility.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 1
1. Companies shall develop, in cooperation with employees' representatives and, where applicable, with public authorities and other relevant stake- holders, mechanisms that anticipate and plan for future employment and skills needs.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, point a
a) mechanisms for the long-term planning of quantitative and qualitative employment and skills needs that are linked to innovation and development strategies and that take into account the foreseeable evolution of employment and skills, both positive and negative; mechanisms to determine the current skill levels of individual employees;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 3
3. Every employee shall be offered a given number of hours of training per year to be determined by law or collective agreement. Any refusal to accept that offer by employees shall only be permitted on justified grounds.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The practical implementing arrangements shall be laid down in an agreement concluded between the parties concerned.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 5
5. Dependent companies shall be informed of the mechanisms and plans provided for in paragraph 2. Their employees shall be covered by those mechanisms and plans upon the request of the dependent company, justified on the grounds that those mechanisms and plans are required or useful for their own adaptation and development. This shall not preclude dependent companies from developing their own mechanisms.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 6, paragraph 1
1. Except in circumstances where restructuring is triggered by unforeseen or sudden events, any restructuring operation shall be preceded by an appropriate preparation with all the stakeholders concerned with a view to preventing or alleviating its economic, social and local impact.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 1
1. Anyll restructuring operation shall be subject to an early explanation and justification to all the relevant stakeholderslevant stakeholders, and in particular employees’ representatives, must be informed in writing of the reasons for any restructuring operation before any practical measures are taken, irrespective of whether the restructuring operation is to be carried out on the basis of either long- term strategic goals and requirements or short-term constraints.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 2
2. The dialogue provided for in paragraph 1 shall include the justification of the choice of the measures envisaged, the description of the individual measures, the impact of the measures envisaged on the employees and the company’s legal and financial situation, the products involved and the scope and time scale of the measures. The dialogue shall also cover measures such as outsourcing, the splitting of the company and the establishment of new domestic and foreign subsidiaries, in order to achieve the objectives and of other possible options, in the light of all the interests concerned.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Employees’ representatives must be informed and consulted at a sufficiently early stage so that the management of the company or group of companies can still respond to proposals made by those representatives and alter their plans and decisions. Employees’ representatives must not be presented with a fait accompli.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 3
3. Companies shall from the beginning inform the public authorities at the relevant level, in particular at local level, before practical restructuring measures are taken and involve them in the preparation of the restructuring process.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. This provision shall not apply if comparable rules on the information and consultation of employees’ representatives are in force at national level.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 1
1. When the need to restructure occurs as a result of the need to preserve their competitiveness and long-term prosperity,management of a company or group of companies shall consider redundancies only as last resort and only after considering all possible alternative options and identifying and, where available, implementing supporting measuress decided to carry out a restructuring operation, all possible alternative options shall be considered and given priority in order to avoid redundancies or ensure that they are considered only as a last resort.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 2, point c
(c) temporary or long-term working-time reduction or re- organisation;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 2, point d
(d) re-negotiation of working conditions;deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 3
3. When redundancies cannot be avoided or as part of the package to be implemented in the context of alternative options, companies shall make available to the employees concerned measures that aim to enhance their employability and help them to re-enter the labour market as quickly as possible. This rule shall be without prejudice to national rules on the protection of workers in general and workers made redundant in particular.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 305 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 9
9. The provisions of Recommendations 6 and 7 shall not apply to companies and employees covered by an agreement concluded at the relevant level and with the relevant parties on the procedures and mechanism for preparing, managing in a socially responsible way and minimising internal social costs of restructuring operations, provided that the agreement sets out arrangements more favourable than those provided for in this Directive.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 15, paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall provide, in specific cases and subject to the conditions and limitations laid down by national legislation, that companies are not obliged to transmit information when its nature is such that, according to objective criteria, it would seriously harm their functioning or would be prejudicial to them.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 391 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 15, conclusion part
A Member State may provide that such dispensation is to be subject to prior administrative or judicial authorisation.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 399 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide for appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with the Directive; in particular, they shall ensure that adequate penalties and administrative or judicial procedures are available to enable the obligations deriving from the Directive to be enforced.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 403 #

2012/2061(INI)

2. Member States shall provide that companies thatemployers who do not comply with the provisions resulting from the Directive shall repay any funding received over a period of 10 years and shall not benefit from any funding in provenance of European Union budget in the five-year period following a judicial decision recognising the breach.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 407 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 2a (new)
2a. Sanctions shall be proportionate, dissuasive and effective.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 412 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 3
3. Member States shall exclude from the benefit of public aidsthe companies referred to in paragraph 2 from the benefit of public aids and contractual relationships funded from the national budgets during the same period the companies referred to in paragraph 2.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 414 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. No measures linked to the planned restructuring may be taken by the management of the undertaking or group of undertakings as long as the consultation and discussions with employees' representatives have not been properly carried out. Member States shall ensure that interim legal protection measures may be taken.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 417 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 4
4. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, nothing shall preclude the use of funds from the general budget of the European Union and from national budgets for the direct benefit of the employees of the companies referred to in those paragraphs whose workplaces are concerned.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of investing in learning to meet the Europe 2020 targets and to strengthen European competitiveness, and urges Member States to improve access to lifelong learning (LLL) for all despite budgetary consolidation processes; stresses that education and training policies should not be evaluated purely in terms of competitiveness, but that education is above all a fundamental human right and a public service which should be guaranteed for all without discrimination;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that countercyclical investments in education and training policies can play a key role in overcoming economic crises;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the need to combat increasing unemployment and the growing insecurity facing young people who have been hit hard by the current economic crisis, by guaranteeing them high-quality, stable and secure employment;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on Member States to comply with and promote the European Quality Charter on Internships and Apprenticeships; insists that internships should only be used as part of education and training, and not as a means of obtaining cheap labour;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for an intensified policy dialogue and cooperation on education and training between the Union and its international partners to reflect the increasing economic, social and political interdependencies and to contribute to the implementation of the external dimension of Europe 2020; draws attention, however, to the damaging effects of austerity programmes, which lead to a brain drain both within the Union and towards third countries.
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2012/2045(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on Member States to involve all stakeholders, particularly the social partners, in the development and implementation of education and training policies.
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) This Regulation should apply to all products regardless of their form or construction that are manufactured by the financial services industry to provide investment opportunities to retail investors, where the return offered to the investor is exposed to the performance of one or more assets or reference values other than an interest rate. This should include such investment products as investment funds, life insurance policies with an investment element, and retail structured products. For these products, investments are not of a direct kind achieved when buying or holding assets themselves. Instead these products intercede between the investor and the markets through a process of "packaging", wrapping or bundling together assets so as to create different exposures, provide different product features, or achieve different cost structures as compared with a direct holding. Such "packaging" can allow retail investors to engage in investment strategies that would otherwise be inaccessible or impractical, but can also require additional information to be made available, in particular to enable comparisons between different ways of packaging investments.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure this Regulation applies solely to such packaged investment products, insurance products that do not offer investment opportunities and products solely exposed to interest rates should thereby be excluded from the scope of the Regulation. Assets that would be held directly, such as corporate shares or sovereign bonds, are not packaged investment products, and should therefore be excluded. Since the focus of this Regulation is on improving the comparability and comprehensibility of information about investment products being marketed to retail investors, occupational pension schemes which fall under the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision or Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), should not be subject to this Regulation. Similarly, certain occupational pension products which fall outside the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, provided that a financial contribution from the employer is required by national law and provided that the employee has no choice as to the pension product provider. Investment funds dedicated to institutional investors are not within the scope of this Regulation either since they are not for sale to retail investors. However, investment products with the purpose of accumulating savings for individual pensions should remain in scope because they often compete with the other products under this Regulation and are distributed in a similar way to the retail investor.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Investment product manufacturers – such as fund managers, insurance undertakings, issuers of securities, credit institutions or investment firms – should draw up the key information document for the investment products they manufacture, as they are in the best position to know the product and are responsible for it. The document should be drawn up by the investment product manufacturer before the products can be sold to retail investors. However, where a product is not sold to retail investors, there is no necessity to draw up a key information document, and where it is impractical for the investment product manufacturer to draw up the key information document, this may be delegated to others. In order to ensure widespread dissemination and availability of key information documents, this Regulation should allow for publication by the investment product manufacturer by means of a website of their choice and a central website to be created by the ECB and the relevant national supervisory authority.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) As retail investors in general do not have close insight as to the internal procedures of investment product manufacturers, a reversal of the burden of proof should be established. The product manufacturer would have to prove that the key information document was drawn up in compliance with this Regulation. However, it would be for the retail investor to demonstrate that his loss has occurred due to the use of the information in the key information document because this matter falls within the direct personal sphere of the retail investor.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) So that the retail investor is able to take an informed investment decision, persons selling investment products should be required to provide the key information document in good time before any transaction is concluded. This requirement should generally apply irrespective of where or how the transaction takes place. Persons selling include both distributors and the investment product manufacturer themselves where they choose to sell the product directly to retail investors. To ensure necessary flexibility and proportionality, retail investors who wish to conclude a transaction using a means of distance communication should be able to receive the key information document after the conclusion of the transaction. Even in this case the key information document would be useful for the investor, for instance to allow the investor to compare the product purchased with that described in the key information document. This Regulation is without prejudice to the Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and the Council.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) In order to give investment product manufacturers and persons selling investment products sufficient time to prepare for the practical application of the requirements of this Regulation, the requirements of this Regulation should not become applicable until twoone years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 44 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
However, it shall not apply to the following products: (a) insurance products which do not offer a surrender value or where that surrender value is not wholly or partially exposed, directly or indirectly, to market fluctuations; (b) deposits with a rate of return that is determined in relation to an interest rate; (c) securities referred to in points (b) to (g), (i) and (j) of Article 1(2) of Directive 2003/71/EC; (d) other securities which do not embed a derivative; (e) occupational pension schemes falling under the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC or Directive 2009/138/EC; and (f) pension products for which a financial contribution from the employer is required by national law and where the employee has no choice as to the pension product provider.deleted
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'investment product' means an investment where regardless of the legal form of the investment the amount repayable to the investor is exposed to fluctuations in reference values or in the performance of one or more assets which are not directly purchased by the investor;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
The investment product manufacturer shall draw up a key information document in accordance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and the specimen contained in the annex for each investment product it produces and shall publish the document on a website of its choice and centrally on a website to be created by the ECB and the relevant national supervisory authority before the investment product can be sold to retail investors.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The key information document shall be a stand-alone document, clearly separate from marketing materials, and shall not contain any product advertisements.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The key information document shall be drawn up as a short document of a maximum of two DIN A4 pages which is:
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
(iii) technical terms are avoided when everyday words can be used instead.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The key information document shall be written in the official language, or one of the official languages of the Member State where the investment product is sold, or in a language accepted by the competent authorities of that Member State, or where it has been written in a different language, it shall be translated into one of these languages.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
This document provides you with key information about this investment product and the fee paid to your intermediary. It is not marketing material. The information is required by law to help you understand the nature of this investment product and the risks of investing in it. You are advised to read it so that you can take an informed decision about whether to invest.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b – point vi a (new)
(via) and the possibility of cancelling the investment product.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
(ii) whether the investment product is covered by a compensation or guarantee scheme, and if so, which scheme;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) under a section titled "What are the risks and what might I get back?", the risk and reward profile of the investment product, including a summary indicator of this profile and warnings in relation to any specific risks that may not be fully reflected in the summary indicator; the description of the risks should be clear and easy to understand;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) under a section titled "What are the costs?", the costs associated with an investment in the investment product, comprising both direct and indirect costs to be borne by the investor, including summary indicators of these costs, and the impact of these costs on the return;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) This Regulation should apply to all products regardless of their form or construction that are manufactured by the financial services industry to provide investment opportunities to retail investors, where the return offered to the investor is exposed to the performance of one or more assets or reference values other than an interest rate. This should include such investment products as investment funds, life insurance policies with an investment element, and retail structured products. For these products, investments are not of a direct kind achieved when buying or holding assets themselves. Instead these products intercede between the investor and the markets through a process of "packaging", wrapping or bundling together assets so as to create different exposures, provide different product features, or achieve different cost structures as compared with a direct holding. Such "packaging" can allow retail investors to engage in investment strategies that would otherwise be inaccessible or impractical, but can also require additional information to be made available, in particular to enable comparisons between different ways of packaging investments.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) under a section titled "How has it done in the past?", the past performance of the investment product, if this is relevant having regard to the nature of the product and the length of its track record;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) for pension products, under a section titled "What might I get when I retire?", projections of possible future outcomes, clearly subdivided into various development scenarios, including the worst-case scenario.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) under a section titled "What fee does my intermediary receive for services rendered?", an overview of the type and amount of fees paid or due to be paid to the intermediary;
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure this Regulation applies solely to such packaged investment products, insurance products that do not offer investment opportunities and products solely exposed to interest rates should thereby be excluded from the scope of the Regulation. Assets that would be held directly, such as corporate shares or sovereign bonds, are not packaged investment products, and should therefore be excluded. Since the focus of this Regulation is on improving the comparability and comprehensibility of information about investment products being marketed to retail investors, occupational pension schemes which fall under the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision or Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), should not be subject to this Regulation. Similarly, certain occupational pension products which fall outside the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, provided that a financial contribution from the employer is required by national law and provided that the employee has no choice as to the pension product provider. Investment funds dedicated to institutional investors are not within the scope of this Regulation either since they are not for sale to retail investors. However, investment products with the purpose of accumulating savings for individual pensions should remain in scope because they often compete with the other products under this Regulation and are distributed in a similar way to the retail investor.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The investment product manufacturer may only include other information where it is necessary for the retail investor to take an informed investment decision about a specific investment product.deleted
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The information referred to in paragraph 2 shall be presented in a common format including the common headings and following the standardised order set out in paragraph 2, so as to allow for comparison with the key information document for any other investment product. The key information document shall prominently display a common symbol to distinguish the document from other documents; as a matter of principle, any negative information shall be presented in complete sentences before any positive information; price lists and conceptual abbreviations shall be prohibited.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 specifying the details of the presentation and the content of each of the elements of information referred to in paragraph 2, the presentation and details of the other information the product manufacturer may include within the key information document as referred to in paragraph 3, and the details of the common format and the common symbol referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall take into account the differences between investment products and the capabilities of retail investors as well as the features of investment products that allow the retail investor to select between different underlying investments or other options provided for by the product, including where this selection can be undertaken at different points in time, or changed in the future. The Commission shall further propose a traffic-light system that will make it easier to classify and categorise investment products as extremely risky, risky and less risky.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Where an investment product manufacturer has produced a key information document which does not comply with the requirements of Articles 6, 7 and 8 on which a retail investor has relied when making an investment decision, such a retail investor may claim from the investment product manufacturer damages for any loss caused to that retail investor through the use of the key information document and may, where appropriate, return the investment product and have the purchase price refunded.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Whenre a retail investor demonstrates a loss resulting from the use of the information contained in the key information documenthas used the key information document and has suffered a loss, the investment product manufacturer shas toll prove that the key information document has been drawn up in compliance with Articles 6, 7 and 8 of this Regulation.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Investment product manufacturers – such as fund managers, insurance undertakings, issuers of securities, credit institutions or investment firms – should draw up the key information document for the investment products they manufacture, as they are in the best position to know the product and are responsible for it. The document should be drawn up by the investment product manufacturer before the products can be sold to retail investors. However, where a product is not sold to retail investors, there is no necessity to draw up a key information document, and where it is impractical for the investment product manufacturer to draw up the key information document, this may be delegated to others. In order to ensure widespread dissemination and availability of key information documents, this Regulation should allow for publication by the investment product manufacturer by means of a website of their choice and a central website to be created by the ECB and the relevant national supervisory authority.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 100 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person selling an investment product to retail investors shall provide them with the key information document in good time before the conclusion of a transaction relating to the investment product and shall keep a record thereof, whereby the burden of proof shall rest with the investment product manufacturer.
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a person selling an investment product may provide the retail investor with the key information document immediately after the conclusion of the transaction where: (a) the retail investor chooses to conclude the transaction using a means of distance communication where: (b) the provision of the key information document in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible, and (c) where the person selling the investment product has informed the retail investor of this fact.deleted
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The person selling an investment product shall provide the key information document to the retail investor in one of the following media that are accessible for the retail investor concerned:
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) As retail investors in general do not have close insight as to the internal procedures of investment product manufacturers, a reversal of the burden of proof should be established. The product manufacturer would have to prove that the key information document was drawn up in compliance with this Regulation. However, it would be for the retail investor to demonstrate that his loss has occurred due to the use of the information in the key information document because this matter falls within the direct personal sphere of the retail investor.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) So that the retail investor is able to take an informed investment decision, persons selling investment products should be required to provide the key information document in good time before any transaction is concluded. This requirement should generally apply irrespective of where or how the transaction takes place. Persons selling include both distributors and the investment product manufacturer themselves where they choose to sell the product directly to retail investors. To ensure necessary flexibility and proportionality, retail investors who wish to conclude a transaction using a means of distance communication should be able to receive the key information document after the conclusion of the transaction. Even in this case the key information document would be useful for the investor, for instance to allow the investor to compare the product purchased with that described in the key information document. This Regulation is without prejudice to the Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and the Council.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 151 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [twoone years after its entry into force].
2013/01/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) In order to give investment product manufacturers and persons selling investment products sufficient time to prepare for the practical application of the requirements of this Regulation, the requirements of this Regulation should not become applicable until twoone years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 171 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
However, it shall not apply to the following products: (a) insurance products which do not offer a surrender value or where that surrender value is not wholly or partially exposed, directly or indirectly, to market fluctuations; (b) deposits with a rate of return that is determined in relation to an interest rate; (c) securities referred to in points (b) to (g), (i) and (j) of Article 1(2) of Directive 2003/71/EC; (d) other securities which do not embed a derivative; (e) occupational pension schemes falling under the scope of Directive 2003/41/EC or Directive 2009/138/EC; and (f) pension products for which a financial contribution from the employer is required by national law and where the employee has no choice as to the pension product provider.deleted
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 215 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'investment product' means an investment where regardless of the legal form of the investment the amount repayable to the investor is exposed to fluctuations in reference values or in the performance of one or more assets which are not directly purchased by the investor;
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 237 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
The investment product manufacturer shall draw up a key information document in accordance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and the specimen contained in the annex for each investment product it produces and shall publish the document on a website of its choice and centrally on a website to be created by the ECB and the relevant national supervisory authority before the investment product can be sold to retail investors.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The key information document shall be a stand-alone document, clearly separate from marketing materials, and shall not contain any product advertisements.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 258 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The key information document shall be drawn up as a short document of a maximum of two DIN A4 pages which is:
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 266 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
(iii) technical terms are avoided when everyday words can be used instead.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 274 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The key information document shall be written in the official language, or one of the official languages of the Member State where the investment product is sold, or in a language accepted by the competent authorities of that Member State, or where it has been written in a different language, it shall be translated into one of these languages.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 285 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
‘This document provides you with key information about this investment product and the fee paid to your intermediary. It is not marketing material. The information is required by law to help you understand the nature of this investment product and the risks of investing in it. You are advised to read it so that you can take an informed decision about whether to invest. This document provides you with key information about this investment product. It is not marketing material.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 338 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b – point vi a (new)
(via) and the possibility of cancelling the investment product.
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 360 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
(ii) whether the investment product is covered by a compensation or guarantee scheme, and if so, which scheme;
2013/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 379 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) under a section titled "What are the risks and what might I get back?", the risk and reward profile of the investment product, including a summary indicator of this profile and warnings in relation to any specific risks that may not be fully reflected in the summary indicator; the description of the risks should be clear and easy to understand;
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 394 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) under a section titled "What are the costs?", the costs associated with an investment in the investment product, comprising both direct and indirect costs to be borne by the investor, including summary indicators of these costs, and the impact of these costs on the return;
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 408 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) under a section titled "How has it done in the past?", the past performance of the investment product, if this is relevant having regard to the nature of the product and the length of its track record;
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 415 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) for pension products, under a section titled "What might I get when I retire?", projections of possible future outcomes, explicitly subdivided into various development scenarios, including the worst-case scenario.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 421 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) under a section titled "What fee does my intermediary receive for services rendered?", an overview of the type and amount of fees paid or due to be paid to the intermediary;
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 428 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The investment product manufacturer may only include other information where it is necessary for the retail investor to take an informed investment decision about a specific investment product.deleted
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 439 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The information referred to in paragraph 2 shall be presented in a common format including the common headings and following the standardised order set out in paragraph 2, so as to allow for comparison with the key information document for any other investment product. The key information document shall prominently display a common symbol to distinguish the document from other documents; as a matter of principle, any negative information shall be presented in complete sentences before any positive information; price lists and conceptual abbreviations shall be prohibited.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 447 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23 specifying the details of the presentation and the content of each of the elements of information referred to in paragraph 2, the presentation and details of the other information the product manufacturer may include within the key information document as referred to in paragraph 3, and the details of the common format and the common symbol referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall take into account the differences between investment products and the capabilities of retail investors as well as the features of investment products that allow the retail investor to select between different underlying investments or other options provided for by the product, including where this selection can be undertaken at different points in time, or changed in the future. The Commission shall further propose a traffic-light system that will make it easier to classify and categorise investment products as extremely risky, risky and less risky.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 492 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Where an investment product manufacturer has produced a key information document which does not comply with the requirements of Articles 6, 7 and 8 on which a retail investor has relied when making an investment decision, such a retail investor may claim from the investment product manufacturer damages for any loss caused to that retail investor through the use of the key information document and may, where appropriate, return the investment product and have the purchase price refunded.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 507 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Whenre a retail investor demonstrates a loss resulting from the use of the information contained in the key information documenthas used the key information document and has suffered a loss, the investment product manufacturer has to prove that the key information document has been drawn up in compliance with Articles 6, 7 and 8 of this Regulation.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 518 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person selling an investment product to retail investors shall provide them with the key information document in good time and demonstrably before the conclusion of a transaction relating to the investment product; the burden of proof for this condition shall rest with the investment product manufacturer.
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 524 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a person selling an investment product may provide the retail investor with the key information document immediately after the conclusion of the transaction where: (a) the retail investor chooses to conclude the transaction using a means of distance communication where: (b) the provision of the key information document in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible, and (c) where the person selling the investment product has informed the retail investor of this fact.deleted
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 555 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The person selling an investment product shall provide the key information document to the retail investor in one of the following media, which must be genuinely accessible for the retail investor:
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 679 #

2012/0169(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [twoone years after its entry into force].
2013/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 53(1) and 62Articles 62, 151 and 153 thereof,
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) No discrimination against workers must occur regarding their freedom of movement. Freedom to provide services entitles undertakings to provide services in other Member States without suffering discrimination. The rights of workers are subordinate to freedom to provide services. Instead of equal treatment, only minimum conditions apply.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) In practice, the posting of workers with the aim of protecting their rights frequently produces the opposite result. Posted workers are no longer protected from exploitation. Workers are posted because they receive only minimum rewards instead of equal pay and working conditions. A multitude of strategies make this possible: Genuine postings are circumvented by means of bogus self- employment; The free movement of workers may be fraudulently undermined by means of spurious postings, frequently involving temporary employment, three- country transfer arrangements and shell companies. At the same time the fundamental trade union principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ at the same place is eroded by posted workers being paid less for the same work, thereby detracting from Europe’s prosperity, social harmony, democratic values and credibility.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) With respect to workers temporarily posted to carry out work in order to provide services in another Member State than the one in which they habitually carry out their work, Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services establishes a core set of clearly defined terms and conditions of work and employment which must be complied with by the service provider in the Member State to which the posting takes place to ensure the minimum protection of the posted workers concerned. Since the objective of protecting workers’ rights under the directive has not been achieved by its implementation to date and matters can only be can only be made better through the non-discriminatory treatment of workers employed in the same Member States, this directive, which is intended enforce Directive 96/71/EC can achieve only a temporary improvement.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Respect for the diversity of national industrial relations systems as well as the autonomy of social partners is explicitly recognised by the Treaty. However, these systems are being undermined by misuse of the provisions of Directive 96/71/EC. This can only be remedied through enforcement of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ in an equivalent post, unless pay levels in the country of origin are lower, in which case they must be applied, given that fair conditions and non-discrimination apply to not only to undertakings but also to workers.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Member States obligations to make information on terms and conditions of employment generally available free of charge and to provide effective access to it, not only to service providers from other Member States, but also to the posted workers concerned, should be further concretised. Posted workers are in their own right entitled to information and advice on the applicable terms and conditions of employment. It is the responsibility of the Member States to create the necessary bodies which may be consulted by posted workers.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive rules on the terms and conditions of employment to be respected with regard to posted workers, Member States should apply only certain control measures or administrative formalities to undertakings posting workers for the provision of services. Such measures and requirements may only be imposed provided that the competent authorities cannot carry out their supervisory task effectively without the requested information and the necessary information cannot be obtained easily from the employer of posted workers or the authorities in the Member State of establishment of the service provider within a reasonable delay and/or less restrictive measures would not ensure that the objectives of the national controls measures deemed necessary are attained all control measures or administrative formalities judged to be effective and necessary for this purpose.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In view of the prevalence of subcontracting in the construction sector and elsewhere, and in order to protect posted workers' rights, it is necessary to ensure that in such sector at least the contractor of which the employer is a direct subcontractor can be held liable to pay to posted workers the net minimum rates of pay due, any back-payments of outstanding remuneration and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners regulated by law or collective agreement in so far as these are covered by Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC in addition to or in place of the employer. The contractor shall not be held liable if he/she has undertaken due diligence. The latter may imply preventive measures concerning proof provided by the subcontractor, including where relevant based upon information emanating from national authoritieevery contractor involved can be held liable for payment of all amounts owing to posted workers.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) In specific cases, other contractors may, in accordance with national law and practice, be also held liable for failure to comply with the obligations under this Directive, or their liability may be limited, after consultation of the social partners at national or sectoral level.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) Member States are free to introduce or continue to apply more rigorous provisions regarding general contractor liability.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
This Directive aims to guarantee respect for an appropriate level of minimum protection of the rights of posted workers for the cross-border provisensure that Member States can enforce successfully Directive 96/71EC. This directive sets out implementation instruments needed for the equal treatment of posted workers as regards all terms and conditions of services, while facilitatemployment applicable ing the exercise of the freedom to provide services for service providers and promoting fair competition between service providerplace where the service is to be performed, in accordance with the national law or practice of the Member States.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the purpose of implementing, applying and enforcing Directive 96/71/EC the competent authorities shall take into account factual elements characterising the activities carried out by an undertaking in the State in which it is established and in the host Member State in order to determine whether it genuinely performs substantial activities, other than p. Purely internal management and/or administrative activities in the Member State of establishment or purely staffing activities in the host Member State preclude posting. Such elements mayshall include: at least:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the place where the undertakingMember State of establishment is the place where the undertaking performs the bulk of its business activity, where most of its customer contracts are carried out and where it has its registered office and administration, uses office space, pays taxes and social security contributions, has a professional licence or is registered with the chambers of commerce or professional bodies,
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the placeMember State of establishment where posted workers are recruited and habitually employed,
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the ratio between the number of workers in the Member State of establishment and the host Member State respectively,
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) the placeMember State of establishment, where the undertaking performs its substantial business activity and where it employs administrative staff,in the sector where the posted worker is employed. Over 50% of the turnover is realised in the Member State of establishment.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the abnormally limited number ofplace where most customer contracts are performed and/or size of turnover realised in the Member State of establishment.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) the undertaking has been present for at least two years in the Member State of establishment.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The assessment of these elements shall be adapted to each specific case and take account of the nature of the activities carried out by the undertaking in the Member State in which it is established. If the undertaking is unable to prove that it performs the bulk of its business activity in the Member State of establishment, it shall be treated as if it had from the start been established in the host Member State.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Such elements mayshall include at least the following criteria:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the work is carried out for a limited period of time in another Member State; The duration of the posting shall be established in accordance with Article 3(6) of Directive 96/71 EC; if similar service contracts with the same service provider and the same contractor are performed in rapid or immediate succession at the same place, the duration thereof shall be calculated as a single total;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) the posting takes place to a Member State other than the one in or from which the posted worker habitually carries out his or her work according to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 and/or the Rome Convention;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) the posted worker returns or is expected to resume working toworker is posted from the Member State fromin which he/she is posted after completion of the work or the provision of services for which he or she wasnormally employed and the employment contract does not apply solely to the posteding;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) the worker is habitually employed in a Member State other than the posting state and the employment contract remains valid after the posting;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) the employment contract was concluded at least three months prior to the posting;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point e
(e) any repeated previous periods during which the post was filled by the same or another (posted) worker. The replacement of a posted worker with another worker or the repeated employment of the same worker in a given post over a limited period gives rise to the legal presumption that the activity is not temporary in nature. An activity is presumed not to be temporary if the cumulative duration of the individual postings exceeds 12 months in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 96/71/EC
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) Recruitment of a worker in the host Member State and/or already employed there shall not constitute a posting.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) If a worker is deployed for the direct or indirect purpose of strike breaking, or intent to do so can be believably established, this shall not constitute a posting.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
All the factual elements enumerated above are indicative factors in the overall assessment to be made and may not therefore be considered in isolation. The criteria shall be adapted to each specific case and take account of the specificities of the situation. If the undertaking cannot prove that a worker is being employed temporarily in another Member State the worker shall be treated as if he were, from the commencement of his activity, a worker of the host Member State. The terms and conditions of employment the Member State of establishment shall apply if they are more favourable.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
For the purpose of establishing whether a person is occupied in a self-employed capacity in the host Member State, the following criteria at least shall be considered: (a) The individual concerned has been engaged in a self-employed capacity for some time previously in the Member State of establishment; (b) The individual concerned fulfils all requirements for the relevant field of activity in the Member State of establishment and has the wherewithal to resume this activity on return; (c) The individual concerned has an office in the Member State of establishment; (d) The individual concerned has a turnover tax number and pays taxes in the Member State of establishment; (e) The individual concerned belongs to the chambers of crafts or commerce or business associations in the Member State of establishment; (f) The individual concerned must demonstrate convincing grasp of the fundamentals of self-employed activity, for example pricing, tendering and invoicing in the relevant sector; (g) The individual concerned must not carry out work predominantly for one contractor; (h) The individual concerned must not be hierarchically bound to accept instructions from the contractor or be in any other way involved in the contractor’s business organisation. If the prospective employer is unable to prove that the individual concerned is self-employed under the legislation applicable in the host Member State, he shall, from the commencement of his activity, be accorded worker status and accordingly benefit from the provisions of all relevant laws and collective agreements. The terms and conditions of employment in the Member State of establishment shall apply if they are more favourable.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 b (new)
If the terms and conditions of employment under Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers and/or Directive 2008/14/EC on temporary agency work may be applicable to a worker, the provisions of the directive most favourable to the worker shall, in case of doubt, apply. If an employer is unable to prove convincingly what terms and conditions of employment apply to the posted worker because of the arrangements in place involving one or more postings (end-on- end postings, several undertakings and/or several Member States) and one or more temporary employment agencies, the law applicable shall be that which is doubly favourable to the worker. The individual terms and conditions of employment in the Member State of establishment shall be compared to those in the host Member State and those which are most favourable applied to the worker. In addition, the terms and conditions of employment for casual and posted workers shall be compared and those most favourable to the worker selected This dual comparison to establish the most favourable terms and conditions shall apply from commencement of the activity.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 422 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) indicate clearly, in a detailed and user friendly manner and accessible format on national websites and by other means which terms and conditions of employment and/or which parts of their (national and/or regional) legislation have to be applied to workers posted to their territory;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) take the necessary measures to make generally available on internet sites and by other means information on which collective agreements are applicable (and to whom), and which terms and conditions of employment have to be applied by service providers from other Member States in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC, whereby, where possible, links to existing internet sites and other contact points, in particular the relevant social partners, shall be provided;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 427 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) make the information available to workers and service providers in languages other than the nationthe desired official language(s) of the country in which the services are provided, if possibleEU, in summarised leaflet form indicating the main labour conditions applicable and upon requests in formats accessible to persons with disabilities; detailed information on labour and social conditions, including health and safety at the workplace, shall be made readily available to employees by various means of communication and contact points.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 442 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) indicate, if possible, a contact person at the liaison office in charge of dealing with requests for information;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 450 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Where, in accordance with national law, traditions and practices, and without prejudice to the autonomy of the social partners, the terms and conditions of employment referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC are laid down in collective agreements in accordance with article 3 paragraph 1 and 8 of that Directive, Member States should ensure that the social partners shall identify these and make the relevant information, in particular concerning the different minimum rates of pay and their constituent elements, the method used to calculate the remuneration due and the qualifying criteria for classification in the different wage categories, , available in an accessible and transparent way for service providers from other Member States and posted workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Access to information and advice for employees (a) Posted workers shall have an independent right to receive from the host Member State information and advice about the working conditions and terms of employment applicable, which must be provided in the EU official language of the worker’s choice. (b) Member States shall make bodies and agencies available to which workers can apply for information and advice and for support in securing respect for their rights. This shall apply both to host Member States and to Member States of establishment. (c) The provision of advice and information for workers may also be taken over by the appropriate trade unions if the requisite funding is supplied by Member States.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 464 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The cooperation of the Member States shall in particular consist in replying to reasonedan obligation to reply without delay to requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations from competent authorities with respect to the situations of posting referred to in Article 1 (3) of Directive 96/71/EC and relevant articles of that Directive, including investigation of any abuses of applicable rules on the posting of workers or possible cases of unlawful transnational activities.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 475 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. In the event of difficulty in meeting a request for information or in carrying out checks, inspections or investigations, the Member State in question shall rapidly inform the requesting Member State with a view to finding a solution. Any permanent refusal to provide the requested data constitutes an infringement of EU law as referred to in Articles 258 et seq. TFEU.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 484 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
This urgency mechanism shall also be used if the criteria in Article 3 lead to the suspicion that the posted worker is employed by a fictitious undertaking or is not a worker or is not genuinely posted. This shall not prevent the national authorities and/or labour inspectorates of the host Member State from taking immediate measures to prevent, investigate and penalise social fraud.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 500 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State of establishment of In accordance with Article 5 of Directive 96/71/EC, the host Member State shall control, monitor and take the necessary supervisory and enforcement measures, in accordance with its national law and/or practice and administrative procedures, with respect to workers posted to its territory. In accordance with the principles established in Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 96/71/EC, the Member State of establishment of the service provider shall also continue to control, monitor and take the necessary supervisory or enforcement measures, in accordance with its national law, practice and administrative procedures, with respect to workers posted to another. To improve enforcement it shall support the competent authority of the host Member State by providing without delay information on whether posting undertakings fulfil the minimum criteria outlined in Article 3 of this directive and in Directive 96/71/EC and whether they are entitled to post workers. Member States which learn that employees in their country are being recruited by service-providers solely for the purpose of immediately posting them to a third Member State may not support these activities but must inform the competent authorities in the host Member State.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 505 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Competent authorities of the host Member State may equally ask the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment, for each instance where services are provided or for each service provider, to provide information as to the legality of the service provider’s establishment, the service provider’s good conduct, and the absence of any infringement of the applicable rulesin order to monitor full compliance both with Directive 96/71/EC and with this Directive. The competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall provide this information in accordance with Article 6.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 508 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The obligation laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not entail a duty on the part of the Member State of establishment to carry out factual checks and controls in the territory of the host Member State where the service is provided. Such cChecks and controls shall, if need be, be carried out by the authorities of the host Member State at the request of the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment, in accordance with Article 10 and in conformity with the powers of supervision provided for in the host Member State's national law, practice and administrative procedures and which respect Union law.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 512 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Member States shall provide the requisite resources for efficient checks and controls.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 516 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The competent authorities in the host Member State shall gather the data referred to in Article 9(1) and analyse them. The competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall gather the relevant data with regard to the criteria referred to in Article 3(1) and with regard to the payment of social insurance contributions and taxes by the service- provider. Member States shall be required to report regularly to the Commission. The Commission shall summarise the reports and publish them regularly. Within two years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an impact assessment concerning the feasibility of an EU-wide notification or registration system, which shall be based on the systems which exist in the Member States and shall be compatible with them.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 528 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States may onlyshall at the minimum impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 540 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an obligation for a service provider established in another Member State to make a simple declaration to the responsible national competent authorities at the latest atprior to the commencement of the service provision, whereby the declaration may only cover the identity of the service provider, the presence of one or more clearly identifiable posted workers, their anticipated number, the anticipated duration and location of their presence, and the services justifying the posting; . This declaration shall state that the service provider has been informed of the minimum working conditions pursuant to Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC and has agreed to comply with them. It shall contain at least details of the identity of the service provider, the name and address of the representative and person authorised to accept service appointed by him/her, the duration of the posting, the date on which it commences, the identity and number of the posted workers, the duties they are to perform and their place or work and place of residence in the host Member State; an obligation for the service provider to inform the competent authorities without delay: - if the posting does not or has not taken place or was terminated ahead of schedule, - if the activity is interrupted, - if the posted worker has been assigned by his/her employer to another undertaking in the Member State of establishment, in particular in the event of transfers of undertakings or mergers;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 557 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an obligation to keep or make available and/or retain copies in paper or electronic form of, during the period of posting and up to two years after the provision of the service, in an accessible and clearly identified place in its territory, such as the workplace or the building site, or for mobile workers in the transport sector the operations base or the vehicle with which the service is provided, in particular of the following documents: - a copy of the A1 form by way of evidence of social insurance in the Member State of establishment, - the employment contract (or an equivalent document within the meaning of Directive 91/533, including, where appropriate or relevant, the additional information referred to in Article 4 of that Directive), - pay slips, time-sheets and proof of payment of wages or copies of equivalent documents during the period of posting in an accessible and clearly identified place in its territory, such as the workplace or the building site, or for mobile, - time-sheets, - an assessment of the occupational health and safety risks pursuant to Directive 89/71/EC, - if the posted workers in the transport sector the operations base or the vehicle with which the service is provided; s a third-country national, copies of his work permit and residence permit;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 569 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a translation of the documents referred to under (b), may be justified provided these documents are not excessively long and standardised forms are generally used for such documents into the desired official language of the EU;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 593 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) an obligation to designate a contact person to negotiate, if necessary,legal or mandated representative to assume the responsibilities of the service provider in the Member State to which the posting takes place and officially authorised to take delivery on behalf of the posting company at his business address in the Member State to which the posting takes place. The responsibilities of the representative shall, if necessary include negotiating on behalf of the employer with the relevant social partners in the Member State to which the posting takes place, in accordance with national legislation and practice, during the period in which the services are provided.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 603 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the procedures and formalities relating to the posting of workers can be completed easily by undertakings, at a distance and by electronic means as far as possible.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 607 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Within three years after the date referred to in Article 20, the necessity and appropriateness of the applicationeffectiveness of national control measures shall be reviewed in the light of the experiences with and effectiveness of the system for cooperation and exchange of information, the development of more uniform, standardised documents, the establishment of common principles or standards for inspections in the field of the posting of workers as well as technological developments, with a view to proposing, where appropriate, any necessary amendments or modifications.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 614 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. For the duration of a worker’s posting, responsibility for the inspection of working conditions shall lie with the authorities or the body in charge in the Member State to which the posting takes place. They may carry out factual checks and controls on their own initiative.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 623 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that appropriateffective checks and monitoring mechanisms are put in place and that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their territory in order to control and monitor compliance with the provisions and rules laid down in Directive 96/71/EC and to guarantee its proper application and enforcement. Such inspections shall be based primarily on a risk assessment to be drawn up regularly by the competent authorities. The risk assessment shall identify the sectors of activity in which the employment of workers posted for the provision of services is concentrated on their territory. When making such risk assessment the realisation of big infrastructural projects, the special problems and needs of specific sectors, the past record of infringement, as well as the vulnerability of certain groups of workers shall be taken into account.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 638 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that inspections and controls of compliance with Directive 96/71/EC are not discriminatory and/or disproportionate shall allocate the necessary resources to ensure inspections and controls.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 653 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. In Member States where, in accordance with national law and practice, the setting of the terms and conditions of employment of posted workers referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, and in particular the minimum rates of pay, including working time, is left to management and labour they may, at the appropriate level and subject to the conditions laid down by the Member States, also the monitor the application of the relevant terms and conditions of employment of posted workers, provided that an adequate level of protection equivalent to that resulting from Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive is guaranteed.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 665 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that trade unions and other third parties, such as associations, organisations and other legal entities which have, in accordance with the criteria laid down by their national law, a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions of this Directive and Directive 96/71/EC are complied with, may engage, on behalf or in support of the posted workers or their employer, with their approval in any judicial or administrative proceedings provided for with the objective of implementing this Directive and/or enforcing the obligations under this Directive. Trade unions shall have the right to bring class actions to enforce the provisions of this Directive and Directive 96/71/EC. They may also be given the right to bring actions in their own name but on behalf of posted workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 673 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraphs 1 and 3 shall apply without prejudice to national rules on prescription deadlines or time limits for bringing similar actions and to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts, if they are more favourable than the stipulations in paragraph (a), and to national provisions according to which the parties to the collective agreements enforce these agreements.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 679 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that the necessary mechanisms are in place to ensure that posted workers are able to receive at least the following:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 684 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) any outstanding remuneration and related elements of pay and social security, including interest, which, under the applicable terms and conditions of employment covered by Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, would have been due;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 691 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
This paragraph shall also apply in cases where the posted workers have returned from the Member State to which the posting took place and in cases where workers are employed as fictitious self- employed workers on a cross-border basis.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 705 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. With respect to the construction activities referred to in the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC, for all posting situations covered by Article 1(3) of Directive 96/71/EC, the Member States shallEach Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure o, in a non- discriminatory basis with regard to the protection of the equivalent rights of employees of direct subcontractors established in its territory, that the contractor of which the employer (service provider or temporary employment undertaking or placement agency) is a direct subcontractor can, in addition to or in place of the employer, be held liable by the postedway, that a contracting authority which commissions another undertaking to carry out work or provide services is liable in respect of the obligations of that undertaking, a subcontractor or an agency contracted by the undertaking or by a subcontractor for claims under the employment contract vis- à-vis its workers and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for non-payment of the following:, acting as a guarantor who has forgone an obligation under a previous claim. Where stricter rules exist at national level, they shall take precedence.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 715 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) any outstanding net remuneration corresponding to the minimum rates of pay and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners in so far as covered by Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 727 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) any back-payments or refund of taxes or social security contributions unduly with held from his/her salary.deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 734 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The liability referred to in the present paragraph shall be limited to worker's rights acquired under the contractual relationship between the contractor and his subcontractor.deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 742 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide that a contractor who has undertaken due diligence shall not be liable in accordance with paragraph 1. Such systems shall be applied in a transparent, non discriminatory and proportionate way. They may imply preventive measures taken by the contractor concerning proof provided by the subcontractor of the main working conditions applied to the posted workers as referred to in Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC, including pay slips and payment of wages, the respect of social security and/or taxation obligations in the Member State of establishment and compliance with the applicable rules on posting of workers.deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 760 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may, in conformity with Union law, provide for more stringent liability rules under national law on a non- discriminatory and proportionate basis in regard to the scope and range of subcontractor liability. Member States may also, in conformity with Union law, provide for such liability in sectors other than those contained in the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC. Member States may in these cases provide that a contractor that has undertaken due diligence as defined by national law shall not be liable.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 775 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The requesting authority may, in accordance with the laws, regulations and administrative practices in force in its own Member State, request the competent authority in another Member State to recover a penalty or fine or retroactive social security contributions or notify a decision imposing a penalty or a fine, in so far as the relevant laws, regulations and administrative practices in force in the requested authority’s Member State allow such action for similar claims or decis or retroactive social security contributions.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 785 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The requesting authority may not make a request for recovery of a penalty or a fine or notification of a decision imposing a penalty or fine if and as long as the fine or penalty, as well the underlying claim and/or the instrument permitting its enforcement in the requesting Member State, are contested in that Member State. This shall not apply where enforcement is nevertheless possible in accordance with the law in the host Member State.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 786 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
If it becomes clear, in the course of the procedure, that the service provider is not in fact established in the Member State of establishment or the address or other details relating to the undertaking are incorrect, the competent authorities shall not close the procedure on formal grounds but shall investigate and attempt to identify the natural or legal person responsible for the posting.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 792 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of recovery of a penalty or fine or notification of a decision imposing a penalty or fine in the requested Member State, any fine or penalty, fine or retroactive payment of social security contributions or notification of a decision imposing a penalty, fine or retroactive payment of social security contributions in the requested Member State, any fine, penalty or retroactive payment of social security contributions in respect of which a request for recovery or notification has been made shall be treated as if it were a fine or penalty of the requested Member State.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 795 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. The requested authority shall promptly inform the requesting authority of the action taken on its request for information, notification or recovery and, more specifically, of the date on which the instrument or decision was forwarded or notified to the addressee. The same shall apply if there are substantial obstacles to the request being successfully processed.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 805 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 1 (new)
1. The working conditions applicable to posted workers as set out in Article 3(2) of the Posting of Workers Directive are minimum requirements. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC are without prejudice to the right of the Member States to establish, apply or bring into force more favourable pay and working conditions for workers than those stipulated in Article 3(7), (8) and (10) of Directive 96/71/EC, in the form of laws, regulations and administrative practices, or to promote or permit the conclusion of collective agreements or arrangements between the social partners which are more favourable for workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 806 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 2 (new)
2. In order to achieve public objectives and perform public tasks in keeping with the principle of equal treatment and non- discrimination, the Member States may, by adopting or applying laws, regulations and administrative practices, promote the granting of equal pay and working conditions at comparable workplaces, in particular in the area of public procurement at national, regional and local level, where this is more favourable for workers. This shall apply without prejudice to this Directive and Directive 96/71/EC. Member States may stipulate that collective agreements going beyond the minimum working conditions laid down by laws, regulations and administrative practices shall apply in the case of transnational undertakings established in other Member States.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 807 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 3 (new)
3. Member States may establish working conditions stipulated for similar undertakings, professions or sectors in a region as more favourable working conditions within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 808 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 4 (new)
4. Member States which do not have a system of general applicability may establish collective agreements applicable to similar undertakings in a region in the sectors concerned as more favourable working conditions. Account shall be taken of corresponding practices in this regard.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 809 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 5 (new)
5. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC shall not prevent Member States from ratifying ILO Convention No 94.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 810 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a – paragraph 6 (new)
6. These directives shall not prevent the introduction or application of indexation mechanisms for wages or for minimum wages, or their application to posted workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 811 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a– paragraph 7 (new)
7. Implementation of this Directive shall not be used to justify a reduction in the general level of protection for workers covered by this Directive and by Directive 96/71/EC.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 817 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may continue to apply and adopt new bilateral arrangements concerning administrative cooperation between their competent authorities as regards the application and monitoring of the terms and conditions of employment applicable to posted workers referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, in so far as these arrangements do not adversely affect the rights and obligations of the workers and companies concerned.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 820 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. In the context of bilateral agreements referred to in paragraph 2, competent authorities of the Member States shall use IMI as much as possible. In any event, where a competent authority in one of the Member States concerned has used IMI, it shall be used for any follow-up required and shall take precedence over the mechanism(s) foreseen in such a bilateral agreement with respect to administrative cooperation and mutual assistance.deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 829 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – title
Report and amendment of Directive 96/71/EC
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 830 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. No later than 5 years after the expiry of the deadline for transposition, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the implementation of this Directive, making appropriate proposals where necessary. In the event that these reports do not show any significant improvement in the situation of posted workers, Directive 96/71/EC shall be amended one year after the end of the reporting period referred to in paragraph 1, to the effect that equal pay rather than only minimum rates of pay, and all collective agreements rather than only generally applicable collective agreements, shall apply for the purposes of Article(3)(1), second indent in conjunction with point (c) in conjunction with paragraph 8, where the remaining conditions are met. Posted workers shall be placed on an equal footing with non- posted workers in the host Member State in relation to the payment of wages, salaries and additional elements of remuneration, annual leave and other working conditions.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) European Union trade policy should help to reduce poverty worldwide by promoting improved working conditions, health and safety at work and fundamental rights.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 b (new)
(5 b) Protection of the rights of workers from third countries covered by this Regulation should be guaranteed in the European Union. The same applies to EU workers providing services in third countries. Among others, the following rules should be complied with: ILO conventions, collective agreements, equal treatment, health and safety at work and trade union rights.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Such an exclusion should not be made on the basis of the introduction by third countries of sustainable development objectives in their public procurement. Such objectives should be encouraged.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Sustainable development criteria, environment policy and social criteria that support working conditions, health and safety at work and equal treatment shall also be taken into account in relation to the award of public contracts. Such criteria shall be favoured and shall on no account be considered a reason for exclusion.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Environment and social policy aspects shall be taken into account in relation to the award of public contracts. Selection criteria such as, in particular, minimum provisions relating to health and safety at work, working conditions, Good Work and compliance with collective agreements shall be encouraged. The selection criterion shall not be the lowest price but the most sustainable tender, and the quality of services shall be ensured.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Rules on health and safety at work, working conditions and collective agreements in particular shall also be complied with in the case of abnormally low tenders.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Commission shall not penalise third countries which introduce sustainable development objectives in their award criteria; on the contrary, these measures shall be encouraged.
2013/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the economic, financial and banking crisis has not abated and has demonstrated that public finances issuesissues relating to the financial industry negatively affect socio- economic development and political stability;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas signifradicantl steps have been taken in EU countries to consolidate public financesreduce public expenditure, but not to increase revenue;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Member States are not all in the same situation, so differentiated strategies should be pursued, in line with the country-specific recommendations adopted by the Council and reflecting country-specific fiscal and macro-financial risks;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas, in particular, Member States benefiting from financial assistance programmes and those under close market scrutiny should strictly meet agreed budgetary targetsreceive special assistance;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas democracies require intensive public scrutiny of all layers of decision- making bodies in charge of the economicy and the relevant policies;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the projected improvement of the fiscal positions of EU Member States; deplores the foreseen protraction of the cyclical slow-down underway;deleted
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that budgetary consolidation remains a necessity, given the strong pressure from financial marketsas the financial markets have given rise to high costs and any attempt to make it impossible for those markets to bring strong pressure to bear on public finances has so far been avoided;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the long-term sustainability of public finances is a condition for growth and for maintaining appropriate levels of public expenditure which meet needs, including investments; stresses that a high level of debtinsufficient State revenue generates adverse effects on health care, pensions, employment and equity among generations;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States to strictly follow the recommendations adopted by the Council in line with the rules set by the ‘six-pack’ on economic governance’ in order to implement fiscal consolidation in a credible and timely manner;deleted
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 59 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Commission to give both negative and positive feedback to Member States through their country-specific recommendationshelp Member States to improve the revenue side of State budgets and give them both negative and positive feedback on the subject, and to underline noteworthy efforts and best practices;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that budgetary consolidation by means of targeted expenditure and by increasing State revenue can be implemented effectively, and can bring long-lasting positive effects, provided that the measures backing it are sufficiently explained and debated and that they respect equparticularly focus on equity and solidarity among citizens;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Invites the Member States to put in place structural growth-oriented reforms in line with the EU 2020 Strategy, having regard, assigning priority to social protection and social inclusion; recalls for improvements in the labour market policies, in particular, by reducing labour taxationworking hours, promoting decent work and optimising training schemes; invites the national governments to put in place innovation policies in order to improve productivity; invites the Member States to create a more efficient business environment with easier credit access to help industries recover competitiveness; lastly, invites reform of the public administration sector to eliminate the red taperender it efficient and responsive to the public;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the key element in the relationship between growth and consolidation is the composition of consolidation; stresses, in that regard, that consolidations based on expenditurrevenue rather than on revenuexpenditure tend to be more lasting and more growth-supporting in the medium-run, and that their possible negative impact in the short run can be mitigated, in particular provided that the consolidation measures taken are credible, socially just and lasting and avoid a reduction in public investment;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States to focus consolidation efforts on the expenditurrevenue side while at the same time safeguardingparticularly allocating resources to growth-enhancing items such as R&D and education; considers that particular attention should also be paid to maintaining or reinforcing the coverage and effectiveness of employment services and active labour market policies such as training schemes for unemployed peopleand further schemes for job-seekers;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 97 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the pursuit of the reformdemands of European trade unions for stabilisation and modernisation of statutory pension systems, while respecting the role of social partners, in order to ensure the financial sustainability and adequacy of pensions in order to prevent poverty in old age and at the same time ensure that pension schemes are financially viable; calls on the Commission and Member States therefore to prevent prolongation of working life and instead to support statutory pension schemes funded on the basis of parity;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Encourages the Member States to implement consolidation procedures on the revenue side to avoid outright tax hikes, and, to focus on improving tax compliance and its management; considers that, if this is not sufficient, and to ensure appropriate participation by those with high incomes and large assets in the financing of public services; considers that a broadening of the tax base should be considered, also inwith a view tof the reduction of economic and social distortions;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recalls that the Member States have committed themselves to engage in reforming fiscal policy within the Euro Plus Pact, and to hold discussions on a regular basis on the adoption of best practices;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Invites the Member States to clarify the responsibility and role of different levels of government (regional and local) in maintainensuring a sound and sustainable public finance framework;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 121 #

2011/2274(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the majorRejects the reforms of the economic and budgetary governance framework adopted recently; considers that, while those reforms not only cannot suddenly solve the crisis, they enhanc but also damage the credibility of the fiscEuropean Union’s objectives of social adjustment, reducing itsice and equal living conditions pursuant to Article 3 TEU and Article 151 TFEU and will aggravate the negative short-term impact on growth;
2012/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 7 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that the two-tier company structures existing in many EU Member States must be treated in the same way as single-tier structures;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that corporate governance should, among other things, facilitate relations with employees, who contribute to, and are dependent on, their company’s success and performance, and is disappointed that this aspect was completely ignored in the Green Paperthat codetermination procedures are hence an integral part of corporate governance;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Subscribes to the OECD definition of 2004, which states that corporate governance ‘involves the entire set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders’;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for greater gender diversity in company boards; by 2015, the proportion of women on (two-tier) supervisory boards should be 40%; ways must be found of achieving a comparable goal in single-tier structures;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the view that the inclusion of stock options as part of remuneration schemes should be minimised, and ideally phased out; and replaced by sustainable long-term remuneration policiccepts the promotion of voluntary employee share ownership schemes; these should be run along the lines; supports, however, the promotion of voluntary employee share ownership schemeset out in the European Economic and Social Committee (ESC) own-initiative opinion of October 2010 on employee financial participation; employee share ownership may neither replace normal remuneration nor restrict collective bargaining;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 – indent 3 a (new)
– annual investment strategy report;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Believes there is a need to study the link between suffering at work and the organisation of work and working time, rather than concentrating on statistical factors and detecting individual fragilities;
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Is most concerned about the results of a recent study by the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) and the European Brain Council (EBC) according to which more than one in three Europeans (164.8 million) suffers from a mental disorder which has thus become the leading cause of illness; calls on the Commission, through more in- depth studies, to examine more closely links with the workload, working schedules and working arrangements and, where appropriate, propose a list of measures to be taken;
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that public procurement is a key market based instrument geared to the needs of society which plays a role in fostering sustainable employment and working conditions;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of including skills and training requirements in contract specifications as a long term strategy; stresses however, that these actions must be relevant to the subject matter of the contract, be proportionate, and not economically disadvantageous and take into account the total life cost;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that a change in procurement practices should seek to simplify procurement rules and thus facilitate socially oriented and innovative public procurement;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the role the EU can play in facilitating the development of successful Public Private Partnerships;deleted
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that the Green Paper does not use the opportunity to clarify the divergent views on public procurement in relation to the posting of workers and make it clear that posted workers are covered by the wage agreements agreed with the trade unions recognised for collective bargaining purposes, and the corresponding minimum working conditions, in force in their host company or host administrative area;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to make it clear that, as a fundamental principle and in all cases, additional obligations relating to the social, environmental and/or innovative aspects of the execution of the contract should be imposed on contractors provided such requirements are materially connected to the object of the contract and arise from the tender specifications;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that public contracts are only awarded to undertakings that undertake in writing, when submitting their tender, to ensure that any temporary workers within the meaning of the Temporary Agency Work Directive employed in connection with the performance of the contract are paid the same as their regular staff members for doing the same work;
2011/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2011/2046(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
– legislative provisions on employees’ right of involvement, similar to those set out in Directive 2005/51/86/EC concerning mergerssupplementing the Statute for a European company;
2011/08/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2011/2046(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – indent 1 a (new)
- arrangements to supplement the legal instrument corresponding to Directive 2001/86/EC by giving employees and their representative bodies an entitlement to fresh negotiations on participation also in cases where, after the establishment of the European company in a Member State, the number of employees exceeds a threshold which, under domestic law, would result in a higher level of participation;
2011/08/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission’s fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, which proposes directions that policy in this area might take in the future, in particular, linking it to the Europe 2020 strategy, with a common strategic framework which would translate the Europe 2020 objectives into investment priorities; stresses that cohesion policy is a horizontally-aligned policy which is enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and is not secondary to the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines that an autonomous cohesion policy is essential for reducing discrepancies in regional development and achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion in the European Union;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Rejects the imposition of conditions on the payment of structural funds – particularly the ESF – for implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy or other EU policies;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Approves the intention of developing new macro-regional strategies for the necessary social and ecological reconstruction of the EU and calls for steps to be taken to identify and combat regional disparities, such as in access to employment and educationpoverty and social exclusion, access to high-quality employment, reducing the average time spent working on a weekly and lifelong basis, education and free access to high- quality services;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the fact that the ESF provides crucial support for employment market and social policies and plays an important part in boosting social inclusion and therefore calls for a significant increase in the funds available to the ESF;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the effectiveness of the ESF to be increased through more results-oriented action and to this end considers that ex ante setting of clear and measurable targets and outcome indicators is neededwhich measure, in particular, success in the fight against poverty and social exclusion and integration in high-quality employment is needed; stresses that result-orientation must not lead to small promoters being disadvantaged or exposed either to new barriers to access or to risks;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to improve the visibility of ESF action and to make the ESF more accessible and capable of providing more support for integration into the job market, particularly by setting up lifelong training to help workers adapt their skills to the needs of the job marketprogrammes which offer workers access to high-quality employment and thus help to eliminate the phenomenon of the ‘working poor’;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for full account to be taken of the experience of the social partners, in particular the trade unions, and social NGOs and for formal steps to draw on that experience to be made compulsory at all stages of the planning, implementation and assessment of the ESF and the other Structural Funds;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2011/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to simplify procedures and reduce excessive administrative costs and the number of otherin general to eliminate obstacles to achieving the EU’s objectives for growth and job creation.objectives in the area of social cohesion between the regions of the EU, such as the bias in EU policies towards growth and competition, austerity measures which involve the dismantling of established social rights, increases in the retirement age, longer working weeks and working lives, labour market deregulation and the abolition of social protection and wealth redistribution systems;
2011/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the free movement of persons and of workers, combined with the harmonisation of social systems, as specified in Article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), is one of the key benefits of European integration;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages all initiatives that aim to facilitate cross-border mobility as a means to the efficient functioning of labour markets and as a means to enhance economic growth and competitiveness withfoster, in keeping with Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, economic growth on the basis of social progress for all men and women in the EU; recognises the need for modernisation of Directive 2005/36/EC;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is convinced that the number ofCalls on the Commission, working closely with professional associations and the social partners, to develop more flexible arrangements to govern regulated professions shall be reduced and; the scope for automatic recognition of qualifications to new professions should be expanded, whilst steps are taken to ensure that the objective laid down in Article 153 of the TFEU of protecting the health and safety of workers, and of users and consumers, is met, with special attention being given to innovative sectors and digital industries;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission for further improvement and proper use of the Internal Market Information System (IMI), in order to have a centralized and interoperable e- system of regulated professions, easily accessible for professionals and, competent public authorities and professional associations, while safeguarding principles of data protection;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for updating the list of activities and for examining the rules on automatic recognition in specific areas, for example in the area of craft, trade and industry;deleted
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to elaborate a common standard of registration of regulated professions, based on the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), and invite Member States to make use of it;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Is convinced that an obligatory register is necessary in order to monitor persons whose professional licence has been revoked within any Member State; this register should be accessible to all the relevant public authorities concerned across all Member States; it should be drawn up in close cooperation with professional associations and the social partners;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for a pragmatic approach to language tests, where registration is possible without proof of language but are permitted upon an offer of employment; the language skills of healthcare professionals should continue to be monitored strictly; the cost of language tests should not be borne by the professionals themselves;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for general simplification of the administrative processes involved and for a reduction of the costs at all levels including those incurred, in keeping with the principle laid down in Article 153 of the TFEU of the protection of the health and safety of workers, and of users and consumers. The costs of the recognition process should not be borne by professionals.
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls, where third-country professionals are concerned, for the following principles laid down in Articles 4.4 and 4.5 of the World Health Organisation's Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel: equal treatment, integration into the labour market and into society in the host Member State and respect for basic social rights;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Takes the view that the arrangements for implementing the compensation measures provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2005/36/EC should be consistent with the rights of workers as laid down in Chapter IV of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; the duration of an adaptation period should not exceed six months;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) In view of the worldwide financial crisis which led to an economic crisis, statistical studies should be carried out in particular on the impact on workers and jobs.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) In addition, particular attention should be paid in statistical studies to the impact on workers and citizens of the measures taken by the EU in agreements between states and the Troika to overcome the worldwide financial and economic crisis. To that end, statistical data should be collected in such a way as to ensure the visibility of developments in individual Member States, e.g. unemployment, job movements, amount of and changes in social transfer payments, number and quality of jobs, socio-geographical changes resulting from job movements within the Member States, within the EU, from the EU and into the EU, changes in pay structure and training measures.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
The European statistical programme for the period from 2013 to 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the programme’) is hereby established. The programme is included in the Annex.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
In order to implement the programme the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes which shall satisfy the requirements laid down in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 and shall set out the objectives pursued and the expected results. Each annual programme shall be submitted to the European Parliament.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter I – point 2.1 – title
2.1 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND EMPLOYMENT
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter I – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – indent 6 a (new)
Development of a plan for measuring economic output beyond the sole criterion of GDP.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter I – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – indent 6 b (new)
Preparation of data in a form that makes visible the impact of the economic crisis on workers and citizens in each individual Member State.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter I – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – indent 6 c (new)
Preparation of data in a form that makes visible the impact on workers and citizens of the measures taken to overcome the economic crisis in each individual Member State.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter II – point 3 – paragraph 1
Put in place gradually an ESS business architecture allowing more integrated production of EU statistics; harmonise and standardise statistical production methods and metadata; enhance the horizontal (across statistical domains) and vertical (across ESS partners) integration of statistical production processes in the ESS in respect of the principle of subsidiarity; use and integrate multiple data sources; produce multi-purpose statistics; improve the speed with which data is provided and/or the frequency of its collection.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter II – point 3 – paragraph 2 – indent 11 a (new)
Improve the provision of ‘necessary information’, i.e. background information on how data are collected, on the quality of data and on the methods used to ensure that users can more readily understand the data collected.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2011/0459(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – chapter II – point 4 – paragraph 6 – indent 7
An increased offer of micro-data sets for statistical research purposes and easier access to data for researchers.
2012/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point a
Staff Regulations
Article 5 – paragraphs 1 and 2
(a) Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be replaced by the following: ‘1. The posts covered by the Staff Regulations shall be classified, according to the nature and importance of the duties to which they relate, in an administrators' function group (hereinafter ‘AD’), an assistants' function group (hereinafter ‘AST’) and a secretaries and clerks' function group (hereinafter 'AST/SC'). 2. Function group AD shall comprise twelve grades, corresponding to managerial, conceptual and analytical as well as to linguistic and scientific duties. Function group AST shall comprise eleven grades, corresponding to executive and technical duties. Function group AST/SC shall comprise six grades, corresponding to clerical and secretarial duties.';deleted
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Staff Regulations
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(b) In point (a) of paragraph 3 the words 'and function group AST/SC' shall be inserted after the words 'in function group AST';deleted
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 9
Staff Regulations
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
9. In Article 29, the following subparagraph shall be added to paragraph 1: 'While maintaining the principle that the vast majority of officials shall(1), first subparagraph, point (b) shall be replaced by the following: ‘(b) whether requests for transfer have been recruited on the basis of open competitions, the appoeived from officials of the same grade in other insting authority may decide, by way of derogation from point (b),tutions, and/or whether to hold a competition internal to the institution, which shall also be open to contractonly to officials and temporary staff as defined in Articles 3a and 3b 2 of the Conditions of Employment of Oother Sservants of the European Union.'Communities and to contract staff as referred to in Articles 3a and 3b of those conditions of employment;’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 58 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 10 bis (new)
Staff Regulations
Article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
10a. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 31: ‘3a. Where an official in function group SC at grade SC 2 or higher moves to function group AST, he shall be classified at a grade and step such that his remuneration is at least equal to that to which he was entitled in the AST/SC function group.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 13 – point a
Staff Regulations
Article 42 a – paragraph 1
(a) In the second sentence of the first paragraph, the word 'institutions' shall be replacThe first paragraph shall be replaced by the following: ‘An official shall be entitled to up to eighteen months of parental leave without basic salary for every child, to be taken during the first twelve years after the birth or adoption of the child. The duration of the leave may be doubled for single parents recognised under general implementing provisions adopted by 'the appointing authority of each institution'; . The minimum leave taken at any one time shall not be less than one month.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 76 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 16 a (new)
16a. The following article shall be inserted after Article 45a: ‘Article 45b An official in function group AST/SC may, from grade SC 2, be appointed to a post in function group AST on condition that the periodical report referred to in Article 43 shows that he has actually and properly carried out functions corresponding to the AST function group for at least two years. An official appointed to a post in function group AST on the basis of this Article shall be classified in a grade and step such that his remuneration is at least equal to that to which he would have been entitled in the AST/SC function group.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 84 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1– point 20
Staff Regulations
Article 52 – point b – paragraph 2
However, an official may at his own request and where the appointing authority considers it justified in the interest of the service, carry on working until the age of 67, in which case he shall be retired automatically on the last day of the month in which he reaches that age.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 89 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 21 – point d
Staff Regulations
Article 55 – paragraph 4
‘4. The appointing authority of each institution may introduce flexible working- time arrangements. Officials to whom the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 44 apply shall manage their working-time without resorting to such arrangements.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 91 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 22 – point -a (new)
Staff Regulations
Article 55 a – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(-a) The following point (da) shall be inserted in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2: ‘(da) from the age of 55,’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 92 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 22 – point -a a (new)
Staff Regulations
Article 55 a – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(-aa) The following point shall be inserted in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2: ‘(db) for any other reason, but for no more than a total of five years over the official's entire career.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 93 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 22 – point a b(new)
Staff Regulations
Article 55 a – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ab) The following point (ea) shall be inserted in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2: ‘(ea) to care for a child under 13 years of age, if the reduction in working time is not more than 5% of normal working time. In such cases, Article 3 of Annex IVa shall not apply.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Implementing rules adopted by the Commission to give effect to these Staff Regulations, including the general implementing provisions referred to in paragraph 1, shall apply by analogy to the agencies. To this end, the Commission shall inform the agenciesconsult the agencies, which shall be jointly represented in accordance with rules to be fixed by agreement between them and the Commission, ofn any such implementing rule without delay afterbefore adoption.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 111 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Such implementing rules shall enter into force at the agencies nine months after their entry into force at the Commission or nine months after the date on which the Commission informed the agencies of the adoption of the respective implementing rule, whichever is later. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an agency may also decide that such implementing rules will enter into force at an earlier date.deleted
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
By way of derogation, an agency may, before the expiry of the nine-month period referred to above and after consulting its Staff Committee, submit to the Commission for its agreement implementing rules which are different from those adopted by the Commission. Under the same conditions, an agency may request the agreement of the Commission for not applying certain of these implementing rules. In the latter case, the Commission may, instead of accepting or rejecting the request, require the agency to submit for its agreement implementing rules which are different from those adopted by the Commission.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 113 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The nine-month period referred to in the previous subparagraphs shall be suspended from the date on which the agency has requested the Commission's agreement until the date on which the Commission has expressed its position.deleted
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 114 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
An agency may also, after consulting its Staff Committee, submit to the Commission for its agreement implementing rules which concern other subjects than the implementing rules adopted by the Commission or which differ from those already in force at the Commission.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 115 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
An agency may only adopt implementing rules which differ from those adopted by the Commission with the agreement of the Commission and after securing the opinion of the Staff Regulations Committee.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 116 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 41
Staff Regulations
Article 110 – paragraph 6
6. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall administer a registercompendium of the rules adopted by the appointing authority of each institution to give effect to these Staff Regulations, and those rules adopted by the agencies to the extent they derogate from the rules adopted by the Commission, in accordance with the procedure provided in paragraph 2. Institutions and agencies shall have direct access to this registercompendium and full right to amend their own rules. Their staff shall also have direct access to that compendium. Every three years, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on rules adopted by each institution to give effect to these Staff Regulations.';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 119 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 43 – point a
Staff Regulations
Annex I – Section A – point 2
2. Function Group AST Replace ‘AST 10-AST 11’ with ‘AST8- AST11’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 43 – point b – point iii
Staff Regulations
Annex I – Section B
2. Multiplication rates for guiding average career equivalence in function group AST/SC: replace the rates 12%-15%-17%-20%- 25% with the rates 20%-25%-25%-25%- 33%.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 122 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 46 a (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex V – Article 4 – paragraph 1
46a. The first paragraph of Article 4 of Annex V shall be replaced by the following: ‘Where an official, for reasons other than the requirements of the service or for reasons outside his control, including having to take sick leave, has not used up all his annual leave before the end of the current calendar year, the amount of leave which may be carried over to the following year shall not exceed twelve days.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 123 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 46 b (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex V – Article 6 – paragraph 1 – indent 10
46b. The tenth indent of Article 6 of Annex V shall be replaced by the following: ‘– serious illness of a child: up to six days where the child is aged six or under or if the official is a single parent within the meaning of the general implementing provisions adopted by the appointing authority of the institution concerned, and up to two days in all other cases;’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 126 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 47
Staff Regulations
Annex V – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
To the annual leave of officials entitled to the expatriation or foreign residence allowance shall be added travelling time based on the geographical distance between the place of employment and the place of origin, calculated as follows:
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 140 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article – point 49 – point c
Staff Regulations
Annex VII – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Officials entitled to the expatriation or foreign residence allowance shall be entitled, within the limit set out in paragraph 2, in each calendar year to a flat- rate payment corresponding to the cost of travel from the place of employment to the place of origin as defined in Article 7 for themselves and, if they are entitled to the household allowance, for the spouse and dependants within the meaning of Article 2.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1– point 49 – point c
Staff Regulations
Annex VII – Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the place of origin as defined in Article 7 is outside the territories of the Member States of the Union as well as outside the countries and territories listed in Annex II to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the territories of the Member States of the European Free Trade Association, the flat- rate payment shall be based on an allowance per kilometre of geographical distance between the official's place of employment and the capital city of the Member State whose nationality he holds. Officials whose place of origin is outsidegeographical distance used as the basis for the flat-rate payment shall be limited to the borders of the territories of the Member States of the European Union as well as outsidend of the countries and territories listed in Annex II to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and of the territories of the Member States of the European Free Trade Association and who are not nationals of one of the Member States shall not be entitled to the flat-rate payment.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 145 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 50 – point c – point i a (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex VIII – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
ia) Paragraph 1, point a) shall be replaced by the following: ‘a) be deferred until the first day of the calendar month following that in which he reaches the age of 65, even if he has not completed 10 years’ service;’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 146 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 50 – point d a (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex VIII – Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
(da) the following shall be added at the end of Article 11, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2: ‘The number of years of pensionable service recognised may not be less than half the former period of service concerned’.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 147 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 50 – point e
Staff Regulations
Annex VIII – Article 12 – paragraph 1
e) In Article 12(1) and (2), the numberArticle 12 shall be amended as follows: i) Paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following: ‘1. An official aged less than 65 years whose service terminates for reasons other than death or invalidity without qualifying for an immediate or deferred retirement pension shall be entitled, on leaving the service: a) where he has completed less than one year’s service and has not made use of the arrangement laid down in Article 11(2), to payment of a severance grant equal to three times the amounts withheld from his basic salary in respect of his pension contributions, after deduction of any amounts paid under Articles 42 and 112 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants; b) in other cases, to a pension provided under Article 11(1) and deferred until the first day of the calendar month following that in which he reaches the age of 63 years, or to payment of the actuarial equivalent of such pension to a private insurance company or pension fund of his choice, on condition such company or fund guarantees that: i) the capital will not be repaid; ii) a monthly income will be paid from age 60 at the earliest, and age 65 at the latest; iii) provisions are included for reversion or survivors’ pensions; iv) transfer to another insurance company or other fund will be authorised only if such fund fulfils the conditions laid down in points i) to iii).’; ii) In paragraphs 1 and 2 the figure '63' shall be replaced by '65';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 157 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 53
Staff Regulations
Annex XI – Article 15 – paragraph 1
Point 53 shall be replaced by the following: ‘The provisions of this Annex shall apply from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2022.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 158 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point c a (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(ca) The following paragraph shall be inserted in Article 18: ‘1a. An official in service on 31 December 2012 shall retain his entitlement to the travelling time provided for in Article 7 of Annex V and the flat-rate payment of travelling expenses provided for in Article 8 of Annex VII, even if he is not in receipt of the foreign residence or expatriation allowance. An official in service on 31 December 2012 shall retain his entitlement to the flat-rate payment of travelling expenses from his place of employment to his place of origin provided for in Article 8 of Annex VII, even if said place of origin lies outside the territory of the Member States of the Union or outside the countries and territories listed in Annex II to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or outside the territory of the European Free Trade Association States.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 161 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point f – point i
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. NotwithstandThe table ing Article 523 of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations, officials who enter the service before 1 January 2013 and who leave the service before the age at which they would have become entitled to a retirement pension in accordance with Article 22 of shall be replaced by the table below: Age at 1 May 2013 Minimum age 54 years or over 50 years 53 years 50 years 6 months 52 years 51 years 51 years 51 years 6 months 50 years 52 years 49 years 52 years 7 monthis Annex may request the second subparagraph of point (b) of Article 9(1) of Annex VIII to be applied from the age determined in accordance with the table below: Until 31 December 2013 55 years 6 months Until 31 December 2014 56 years Until 31 December 2015(+ 1 m.) 48 years 53 years 2 months (+ 2 m.) 47 years 53 years 9 months (+ 3 m.) 46 years 54 years 4 months (+ 4 m.) 45 years 54 years 11 months (+ 5 m.) 44 years 55 years 6 months (+ 6 m.) 43 years 56 years 1 month 42 years 56 years 68 months Until 31 December 2016 57 years Until 31 December 201741 years 57 years 3 months 40 years 57 years 610 months less than 40 years 58 years
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 162 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point g a (new)
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 26 a (new)
(ga) The following Article 26a shall be inserted after Article 26: ‘Article 26a Officials who requested the transfer of their pension entitlements within the time limit set but refused the transfer proposal they were offered, who did not request the transfer within the time set or whose request was refused on the grounds it was made after the deadline, may still submit their request or reapply by 31 December 2013 at the latest.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 169 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point i
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) Officials who are in grade AST 8 or AST 9 on 31 December 2012 and are effectively carrying out the duties of a senior assistant shall be classified as Senior Assistants;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 174 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point i
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 30 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. ‘By way of derogation from Annex I, section B, the multiplication rates for guiding average career equivalence for grade 9 of function group AST are as follows: for 2013: 20 % for 2014: 20 % for 2015: 17 % for 2016: 14 % for 2017: 11 % from 2018: 8 %’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 175 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 55 – point i
Staff Regulations
Annex XIII – Article 30 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Officials aged 55 years or over on 1 January 2013 may work half time in accordance with Article 55a(2)(e) of the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of Annex IVa for a maximum period of five years prior to their retirement.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 177 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 9
'A member of the temporary staff shall serve a nine month probationary periodwhose contract is for a period of at least one year or for an indefinite period shall serve a nine month probationary period. A member of the temporary staff whose contract is for a period of less than one year may be required to serve a probationary period which may not exceed six months.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 179 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 10 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)
10a. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 16: ‘The second and third paragraphs shall not apply to staff members with permanent contracts.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 180 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 11 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 17 – paragraph 4 a (new)
11a. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 17 after paragraph 4: ‘Women whose maternity leave begins before the end of their contract will be entitled to maternity leave and maternity pay.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 184 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 19
Conditions of Employment
Article 47 – point a
'at the end of the month in which the servant reaches the age of 65, or, on an exceptional basis, at the date fixed in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 52(b) of the Staff Regulations; or';
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 185 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 19 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 47 – point c – point i
In Article 47(c)(i), the words ‘and a maximum of 10 months’ shall be deleted.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 186 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 19 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 48 – point b
19a. Article 48(b) shall be replaced by the following: ‘(b) if the servant appointed under a fixed-term contract is unable to resume his duties at the end of a period of paid sick leave as provided for in Article 16. In such case, the servant shall receive an allowance equal to his basic salary, plus family allowances at the rate of two days per month of service completed.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 187 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 21
Conditions of Employment
Article 51
Article 37, with the exception of point (b) of the first paragraph, and Articles 38 and 45 of the Staff Regulations shall apply by analogy to members of the temporary staff referred to in Article 2(f).
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 188 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 21
Conditions of Employment
Article 53 – paragraph 2
In case of an external selection procedure, temporary staff referred to in Article 2(f) shall be engaged only at grades SC1 to SC3, AST 1 to AST 4 or AD 5 to AD 8. However, the agency may, where appropriate, authorise the engagement at grade AD 9, AD 10, AD 11 or, on an exceptional basis, at grade AD 12. The total number of engagements at grades AD 9 to AD 12 in an agency shall not exceed 20 % of the total number of engagements of temporary staff to the function group AD, calculated over a five- year rolling period.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 189 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 21
Conditions of Employment
Article 54 – paragraph 1
In the case of temporary staff referred to in Article 2(f), classification in the next higher grade shall be exclusively by selection from among staff members who have completed a minimum period of two years in their grade, after consideration of the comparative merits of such temporary staff and of the reports on them. The last sentence of Article 45(1) and Article 45(2) of the Staff Regulations shall apply by analogy. The multiplication rates for guiding average career equivalence, as set out for officials in Section B of Annex I to the Staff Regulations, may not be exceededshall apply by analogy.
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 191 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 30 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 93
FUNCTION Step GROUP GRADE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 18 19 5 832,42 5 953,71 6 077,52 6 203,91 6 332,92 6 464,62 6 599,06 17 18 5 154,85 5 262,04 5 371,47 5 483,18 5 597,20 5 713,60 5 832,42 16 17 4 555,99 4 650,73 4 747,45 4 846,17 4 946,95 5 049,83 5 154,85 IV 15 16 4 026,70 4 110,44 4 195,92 4 283,18 4 372,25 4 463,17 4 555,99 14 15 3 558,90 3 632,91 3 708,46 3 785,58 3 864,31 3 944,67 4 026,70 13 14 3 145,45 3 210,86 3 277,63 3 345,80 3 415,37 3 486,40 3 558,90 III 12 3 4 026,63 4 110,36 4 195,84 4 283,09 4 372,15 4 463,07 4 555,88 11 12 3 558,86 3 632,87 3 708,41 3 785,53 3 864,25 3 944,60 4 026,63 III 10 1 3 145,45 3 210,86 3 277,63 3 345,80 3 415,37 3 486,40 3 558,90 9 10 2 780,03 2 837,84 2 896,86 2 957,09 3 018,59 3 081,36 3 145,43 89 2 457,08 2 508,17 2 560,33 2 613,57 2 667,92 2 723,40 2 780,03 8 3 145,45 3 210,86 3 277,63 3 345,80 3 415,37 3 486,40 3 558,90 7 2 780,03 2 837,84 2 896,86 2 957,09 3 018,59 3 081,36 3 145,43 II 6 2 456,97 2 508,07 2 560,24 2 613,49 2 667,84 2 723,33 2 779,98 5 2 171,49 2 216,65 2 262,76 2 309,82 2 357,86 2 406,91 2 456,97 4 1 919,18 1 959,10 1 999,84 2 041,44 2 083,90 2 127,24 2 171,49 I 4 3 2 364,28 2 413,35 2 463,43 2 514,56 2 566,74 2 620,01 2 674,392 780,03 2 837,84 2 896,86 2 957,09 3 018,59 3 081,36 3 145,43 3 2 457,08 2 508,17 2 560,33 2 613,57 2 667,92 2 723,40 2 780,03 I 2 2 090,12 2 133,50 171,49 2 216,65 2 177262,786 2 222,98 2 269,11309,82 2 357,86 2 31406,291 2 364,28456,97 1 1 847,76 1 886919,118 1 925,2559,10 1 965,2199,84 2 041,44 2 00583,990 2 047,63 2 090,12 127,24 2 171,49
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 192 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 a (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 126 – paragraph 1
33a. Article 126(1) shall be replaced by the following: ‘1. The accredited parliamentary assistant shall be classified by grade via a fair system proposed by the authority, in accordance with the indication given by the Member or Members whom the assistant will support, in accordance with their proved qualifications and the implementing measures referred to in Article 125(1). In order to be classified in grades 14 to 19, as set out in Article 133, accredited parliamentary assistants shall be required, as a minimum, to have a university degree or equivalent professional experience.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 b (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 126 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In Article 126(1), the following subparagraph shall be added: ‘By way of derogation from Article 9, the arrangements relating to the autonomous representation of accredited parliamentary assistants shall be laid down by the implementing measures referred to in Article 125(1) taking into account that a formal link shall be established between the statutory representation of staff and the autonomous representation of assistants.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 196 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 c (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 126 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
33c. In the second subparagraph of Article 126(2), after the words: ‘taking into account that a formal link shall be established between the statutory representation of staff and the autonomous representation of assistants’ the following shall be added: ‘In the absence of any formally established link between the autonomous representation of assistants and the statutory representation of staff, or if the autonomous representation of assistants judges these links to be invalid, the autonomous representation of assistants may at any time refer its objection to the European Court of Justice of the European Union for a ruling thereon. In such a case, the legal fees of the autonomous representation of assistants shall be met by Parliament, which shall not be allowed to require it to use the services of a preselected lawyer or legal firm.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 197 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 d (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 129 – paragraph 1
33d. In Article 129(1), after the words:’the requirements of Article 128(2)(d)’, the following shall be added: ‘The strict confidentiality of the data obtained in the course of the medical examination shall be guaranteed. The medical examination shall accordingly be strictly limited to what is necessary to establish the fitness of the accredited assistant to carry out the duties for which he is recruited. Where an accredited assistant considers that the medical examination exceeds this specific parameter, the medical services and the appointing authority shall forward to him by registered mail the medical justification for each of the examinations accredited assistants are required to undergo. If the accredited assistant does not agree with the justification and makes this known within three weeks from receipt of the mail, the appointing authority shall refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a ruling on the suitability and relevance of these examinations to assess the ability of a candidate to carry out the duties for which he is recruited. The fees incurred by the assistant in question for the services of a lawyer or legal firm shall be met by Parliament. The accredited assistant shall be free to use the services of a layer or legal firm of his own choosing.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 198 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 e (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 131 – paragraph 2
33. Article 131(2) shall be replaced by the following: ‘2. The weekly working hours of an accredited parliamentary assistant shall be set by the Member; for full time accredited parliamentary assistants in normal circumstances amount to 40 hours per week but may not exceed 42 hours per week. The second and fourth paragraphs of Article 55 of the Staff Regulations shall apply by analogy.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 200 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 f (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 131 – paragraph 4
33f. Article 131(4) shall be replaced by the following: ‘4. However, overtime worked by accredited parliamentary assistants shall carry the right to compensation.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 201 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 g (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 132
33g. In Article 132, after the words:’The arrangements for reimbursement of mission expenses shall be laid down in the implementing measures referred to in Article 125(1)’, the following shall be added: ‘Where it emerges from the official list of Members that the Member’s constituency or domicile is situated within the European Community or in a Member State but outside of Europe, Parliament shall, within the limit of two return journeys per year per accredited assistant working exclusively for that Member, reimburse the airfare, in accordance with the implementation provisions regarding missions, between his place of work and the Member’s constituency or domicile.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 203 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 h (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 132 a (new)
33h. The following Article 132a shall be inserted: ‘Article 132 In accordance with the implementing measures referred to in Article 125(1), the Articles 5, 6 and 9 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations (reimbursement of expenses incurred by him on taking up appointment, transfer or leaving the service) shall apply by analogy to accredited parliamentary assistants who are appointed with a contract of a minimum period of 2,5 years, whereas Articles 7(1), 7(2), first subparagraph, and 8(1), 8(2) shall apply by analogy to accredited parliamentary assistants who are appointed with a contract of a minimum period of 1 year.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 205 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 i (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 139 – paragraph 3 a (new)
33i. The following paragraph shall be inserted in Article 139: ‘3a. Where the contract ceases pursuant to paragraphs 1(d), 1(e) and 3, the procedure to be followed shall guarantee observance of the rights of defence of the accredited parliamentary assistants and the duty to protect employees. In accordance with the implementing measures referred to in Article 125(1), this procedure shall cover all the different stages from the probationary period before recruitment to the steps to be followed for a duly justified dismissal.’;
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 206 #

2011/0455(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 33 j (new)
Conditions of Employment
Article 139 – paragraph 4
33j. In Article 139(4), after the words: ‘shall not be regarded as constituting ‘years of service’ for the purposes of Article 29(3) and (4) of the Staff Regulations’, the following shall be added: ‘However, all accredited assistants who have worked full time for at least four years, three-quarter time for at least six years or half time for at least eight years shall, from completion of these periods of service and up to four years from the end of their last contract, be entitled to assume posts as contract or temporary staff published by the European institutions and normally filled by competition. Assistants who have worked for at least four years as accredited assistants in Function Group I shall be entitled to assume posts as contractual or temporary staff in Function Groups II and III. Assistants who have worked for at least four years as accredited assistants in Function Group II shall be entitled to assume posts as contractual or temporary staff in Function Groups III and IV.’
2012/03/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 37 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) In order to guarantee the opening up to competition of procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, provisions should be drawn up coordinating procurement procedures in respect of contracts above a certain value. Such coordination is needed to ensure the effect of the principles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services as well as the principles deriving therefrom, such as equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency. In view of the nature of the sectors affected by such coordination, the latter should, while safeguarding the application of those principles, establish a framework for sound commercial practice and should allow maximum flexibilityGiven the particular obligations incumbent on states in relation to public provision in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, single market criteria are applicable there to only a limited extent.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Public procurement plays a key role in the Europe 202016 strategy as one of the market-based instruments to be used to achieve a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth while ensuring the most efficient use of public funds. For that purpose, the current public procurement rules adopted pursuant to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors17 and Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts18 have to be revised and modernised in order to increase the efficiency of public spending, facilitating in particular the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement and to enable procurers to make better use of public procurement in support of common societal goals. There is also a need to clarify basic notions and concepts to ensure better legal certainty and to incorporate certain aspects of related well-established case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.deleted
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Article 9 TFEU stipulates that the Union must take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health when defining and implementing its policies and activities. This Directive contributes to attaining these objectives by encouraging sustainable public procurement, the integration of social criteria in all stages of the procurement procedure and the fulfilment of obligations relating to social and employment conditions, workplace health and safety, social security and working conditions, as set out by EU and national laws, regulations or administrative provisions, arbitration awards, collective agreements and contracts and the international labour law provisions listed in Annex XIV, that apply in the place where the work, service or supply is performed; these obligations shall also apply in cross-border situations, where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) This Directive should not prevent Member States from complying with ILO Convention 94 on labour clauses in public contracts, and encourages the inclusion of labour clauses in public procurement.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) To ensure a real opening up of the market and a fair balance, in the application of procurement rules in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors it is necessary for the entities covered to be identified on a basis other than their legal status. It should be ensured, th, that states are able to perefore, that the equal treatment of contracting entities operating in the public sector and those operating in the private sector is not prejudiced. It is also necessary to ensure, in keeping with Article 345 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, that the rules governing the system of property ownership in Member States are not prejudicedm their task of public provision, it is necessary that the entities covered should not be subject to uniform treatment to the same degree on the basis of their public remit.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Under Article 14 of the TFEU in association with Protocol No 26 thereto, national, regional and local authorities enjoy wide discretion in decisions on procurement in the field of services of general interest.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Contracts should be awarded on the basis of objective criteria that ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and equal treatment. Those criteria should guarantee that tenders are assessed in conditions of effective competition, also where contracting entities require high-quality works, supplies and services that are optimally suited to their needs. As a result, contracting entities should be allowed to adopt as an award criteria either ‘the moston ‘an economically advantageous tender’ or ‘the lowest cost’, taking into account that in the latter case they are free to set adequate quality standards by using technical specifications or contract performance conditions.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
(47) Furthermore, in technical specifications and in award criteria, contracting entities should be allowed to refer to a specific production process, a specific mode of provision of services, or a specific process for any other stage of the life-cycle of a product or service, provided that they are linked to the subject-matter of the contract. In order to better integrate social considerations in public procurement, procurers may also be allowed to include, in the award criterion of the most economically advantageous tender characteristics related to the working conditions of the persons directly participating in the process of production or provision in question. Those characteristics may only concern, in addition to the protection of health of the staff involved in the production process or, compliance with national, European and international employment law and the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract, including accessibility for persons with disabilities. Any award criteria which include those characteristics should in any event remain limited to characteristics that have immediate consequences on staff members in their working environment. They should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services32 and in a way that does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators from other Member States or from third countries parties to the Agreement or to Free Trade Agreements to which the Union is party.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 51
(51) The laws, regulations and collective agreements, at both national and Union level, that are in force in the areas of employment conditions and safety at work apply during the performance of a contract, provided that such rules, and their application, comply with Union law. In cross-border situations where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State for the purpose of performing a contract, Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services lays down the minimum conditions that must be observed by the host country in respect of such posted workersnationally, in the European Union and internationally apply during the performance of a contract. The principle of equal pay for equal work in a comparable job shall apply. Where national law contains provisions to this effect, non- compliance with those obligations may be considered to be grave misconduct on the part of the economic operator concerned, liable to lead to the exclusion of that economic operator from the procedure for the award of a public contract.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 51 a (new)
(51a) In the event of a change of contractor, the new contractor might take over workers from the former contractor. In such cases, the relevant provisions of Directive 2001/23/EC should be applied so as to ensure appropriate employment and working conditions for the workers concerned.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) EUR 4500 000 for supply and service contracts as well as for design contests;
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) EUR 56 000 000 for works contracts;
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) EUR 1 000 000 for contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVII.deleted
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions on the remuneration of certain services, the criteria on which, the contracting entities shall base the award of contracts shall be one ofon the following criterion:
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the mostan economically advantageous tender;.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the lowest cost.deleted
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Costs may be assessed, at the choice of the contracting entity, on the basis of the price only or using a cost-effectiveness approach, such as a life-cycle costing approach, under the conditions set out in Article 77.deleted
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The mostAn economically advantageous tender referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1) from the point of view of the contracting entity shall be identified on the basis of criteria linked to the subject- matter of the contract in question.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Those criteria shall include, in addition to the price or costs referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1, other criteria linked to the subject-matter of the contract in question, such ascosts, other criteria:
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) the application of wage agreements and arbitration awards at national, local, sector and company level and of statutory provisions on health and safety and working conditions at national, European Union and international level.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) If, in the event of a change of contractor, the new contractor takes over workers from the former contractor, the workers shall be covered by the relevant legal effects of Directive 2001/23/EC.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 3
220. Member States may provide that the award of certain types of contracts shall be based on the mostan economically advantageous tender as referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 and in paragraph 2.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4
The relative weighting or order of importance shall be specified, as appropriate, in the notice used as a means of calling for competition, in the invitation to confirm interest, in the invitation to tender or to negotiate, or in the specifications. Criterion (da) shall be mandatory.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
226. The contracting entity shall request economic operators to explain the price or costs charged, where all of the following conditions are fulfilled:
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the price or cost charged is more than 530 % lower than the average price or costs of the remaining tenders;
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the price or cost charged is more than 20 % lower than the price or costs of the second lowest tender;
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) at least fivthree tenders have been submitted.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) compliance, at least in an equivalent manner, with obligations established by Union legislation in the field ofnational, European Union and international social and labour law or environmental law or of the international social and environmental law provisions listed in Annex XIV or, where not applicable, with other provisions ensuring an equivalent level of protection;
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 79 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Contracting entities shall reject the tender, where they have established that the tender is abnormally low because it does not comply with obligations established by Union legislation in the field ofnational and European Union obligations established by social and labour law or environmental law or by the international social and environmental law provisions listed in Annex XIV.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 80 – paragraph 1
Contracting entities may lay down special conditions relating to the performance of a contract, provided that they are indicated in the call for competition or in the specifications. Those conditions may, in particular, concernshall include compliance with obligations relating to social and environmploymental considerations. They may also include the requirement that economic operators foresee compensations for risks of price increases that are the result of price fluctuations (hedging) and that could substantially impact the performance of a contractditions, workplace health and safety, social security and working conditions, as set out in national, European Union and international legislation, arbitration awards and wage agreements. The principle of equal pay for equal work in a comparable job shall apply. These obligations shall also apply in cross- border situations, where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 1
232. In the procurement documents, the contracting entity mayauthority shall ask, or mayshall be required by a Member State to ask, the tenderer to indicate in its tender any share of the contract it may intend to subcontract to third parties and any proposed subcontractors and to give information on the subcontractors, including their names, contact details and legal representatives. Any change in the subcontracting chain and any new subcontractor shall be indicated without delay to the contracting authority, including the subcontractors’ names, contact details and legal representatives.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 2
233. Member States may provide that, at the request of the subcontractor and where the nature of the contract so allows, the contracting entity shall transfer due payments directly to the subcontractor for services, supplies or works provided to the main contractor. In such case, Member States shall put in place appropriate mechanisms permitting the main contractor to object to undue payments. The arrangements concerning that mode of payment shall be set out in the procurement documents.deleted
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3
234. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to the question of the principal economic operator's liability. The main contractor and any intermediate subcontractor can, in addition to or in place of a subcontractor, be directly held liable like a guarantor by employees and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for any liability which arises from the failure by a subcontractor to comply with provisions relating to social and employment conditions, such as workplace health and safety, social security and working conditions, as set out by EU and national laws, regulations or administrative provisions, arbitration awards, collective agreements and contracts and the international labour law provisions listed in Annex XI, that apply in the place where the work, service or supply is performed; these obligations shall also apply in cross- border situations, where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State. This shall apply without any further conditions, in particular without the employer being directly at fault.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2011/0439(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. A maximum of three undertakings may be involved successively in the performance of a public contract as subcontractors.
2012/07/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Certain coordination provisions should also be introduced for the award of works and services concessions awarded in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors given that national authorities may influence the behaviour of entities operating in those sectors and taking into account the closed nature of the markets in which they operate, due to the existence of special or exclusive rights granted by the Member States concerning the supply to, provision or operation of networks for providing the services concerned.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Pursuant to Article 9 TFEU, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health when defining and implementing its policies and activities. The provisions of Articles 2, 3 and 4 as well as Article 14 TFEU and, in particular, Article 36 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Protocol 26 to the TFEU on services of general interest must be observed. This Directive contributes to attaining these objectives by encouraging the sustainable award of services concessions, the integration of social criteria in all stages of the procurement procedure and the respect of obligations relating to social and employment conditions, workplace health and safety, social security and working conditions as set out by EU and national laws, regulations or administrative provisions, arbitration awards, collective agreements and contracts, as well as the international labour law provisions listed in Annex XI, that apply in the place where the work, service or supply is performed; these obligations shall also apply in cross- border situations, where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) This Directive should not prevent the Member States from adhering to International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 94 on labour clauses in public contracts, and requiring the inclusion of labour clauses in services concessions.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Concessions are contracts for pecuniary interest concluded between one or more economic operators and one or more contracting authorities or entities and having as their object the acquisition of works or services where the consideration consists, normally, in the right to exploit the works or services that are the subject of the contract. The execution of these works or services areis subject to specific binding obligations defined by the contracting authority or entity which are legally enforceable. By contrast, certain State acts such as authorisations or licences whereby the State or a public authority establishes the conditions for the exercise of an economic activity, should not qualify as concessions. The same applies to certain agreements having as their object the right of an economic operatorwhereby the State or contracting authority or entity grants an economic operator, for remuneration, the right to exploit certain public domains or resources, (such as tenancy or land lease contracts whereby the State or contracting authority or entity establishes only general conditions for their use without acquiring specific works or servicesfor land at maritime and inland ports) and in which, as a rule, only general conditions for their use are established without the contracting authority becoming the recipient of specific services performed by the contract partner.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Difficulties related to the interpretation of the concepts of concession and public contract have been source of continued legal uncertainty among stakeholders and have given rise to numerous judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union on this subject. Therefore, the definition of concession should be clarified, in particular by referring to the concept of substantial share of operating risk. The main feature of a concession, the right to exploit the works or services, always implies the transfer to the concessionaire of an economic risk involving the possibility that it will not recoup the investments made and the costs incurred in operating the works or services awarded. The application of specific rules governing the award of concessions would not be justified if the contracting authority or entity relieved the contractor of any potential loss, by guaranteeing a minimal revenue, equal or higher to the costs that the contractor has to incur in relation with the performance of the contract. At the same time it should be made clear that certain arrangements which are fully paid by a contracting authority or a contracting entity should qualify as concessions where the recoupement of the investements and costs incurred by the operator for execution the work or provididng the service depends on the actual demand for or the availability of the service or asset.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) In accordance with Article 14 TFEU in association with Protocol 26 thereto, national, regional and local authorities shall have wide discretion in deciding whether to award contracts for services of general interest.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) A review of so-called prioritary and non-prioritary services (‘A’ and ‘B’ services) by the Commission has shown that it is not justified to restrict the full application of procurement law to a limited group of services.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In the light of the results of the evaluation conducted by the Commission on the reform of public procurement rules it is appropriate toThose services of general interest that address people’s basic needs shall be excluded from the full application of this Directive only those services which have a limited cross-border dimension, namely the so-called services to the person: for example, municipal water supply and wastewater disposal services, refuse handling services and services such as certain social, health, cultural and educational services. These services are provided within a particular context that varies widely amongst Member States, due to different cultural traditions. A specific regime should therefore be established for concession for these services which takes into account the fact that they are newly regulated. An obligation to publish a prior information notice and a concession award notice of any concession with a value equal to or greater than thresholds established in this Directive is an adequate way to provide information on business opportunities to potential tenderers as well as on the number and type of contracts awarded to all interested parties. Furthermore, Member States should put in place appropriate measures with reference to the award of concession contracts for these services aimed at ensuring compliance with the principles of transparency and equal treatment of economic operators while allowing contracting authorities and contracting entities to take into account the specificities of the services in question. Member States should ensure that contracting authorities and contracting entities may take into account the need to ensure quality, continuity, accessibility, availability and comprehensiveness of the services, the specific needs of different categories of users, the involvement and empowerment of users and innovation.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) In technical specifications and in award criteria, contracting authorities and contracting entities should be allowed to refer to a specific production process, a specific mode of provision of services, or a specific process for any other stage of the life cycle of a product or service, provided that they are linked to the subject-matter of the concession. In order to better integrate social considerations in the award of concessions, procurers may also be allowed to include, in the award criteria, characteristics related to the working conditions. However, where the contracting authorities or contracting entities use the most economically advantageous tender, such criteria may only relate to the working conditions of the persons directly participating in the process of production or provision in question. Those characteristics may only concern the protection of health of the staff involved in the production process or the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract, including accessibility for persons with disabilities. In this case, any award criteria which include those characteristics should in any event remain limited to characteristics that have immediate consequences on staff members in their working environment. They should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services1 and in a way that does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators from other Member States or from third countries parties to the Agreement or to Free Trade Agreements to which the Union is party, the protection of health or the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract, including accessibility for persons with disabilities. Contracting authorities and contracting entities should, also where they use the criterion of the most economically advantageous tender, be allowed to use as an award criterion the organisation, qualification and experience of the staff assigned to performing the concession in question, as this may affect the quality of concession performance and, as a result, the economic value of the tender.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) The laws, regulations and representative collective agreements, at both national and European Unionall level,s which are in force in the areas of employment conditions and safety at work should apply during performance of a concession, providnationally, ing that such rules, and their application, comply with Union law. In cross-border situations, where workers from one Member State provide services in another Member State for the purpose of performing a concession, Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services lays down the minimum conditions which must be observed by the host country in respect of such posted workerse European Union and internationally should apply during performance of a concession. The principle of equal pay for equal work in a comparable job shall apply.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) If, when a concession is awarded, workers are taken over by the new concession holder from an authority, a public contracting body or the previous concession holder, the legal consequences of Directive 2001/23/EC in terms of safeguarding employment and working conditions shall apply in respect of the workers.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Concessions should not be awarded to economic operators that have participated in a criminal organisation or have been found guilty of corruption, fraud to the detriment of the Union’s financial interests or money laundering. Non-payment of taxes or social security contributions should also be sanctioned by mandatory exclusion at the level of the Union. In order to enable prosecutions for past breaches of the law and to provide, in future concessions, for the clear and transparent apportionment of responsibility between the principal economic operator and subcontractors, both the principal economic operator and the subcontractors should be independently as well as jointly and severally liable. Furthermore, contracting authorities and contracting entities should be given the possibility to exclude candidates or tenderers for serious violations of Union or national law aimed at the protection of public interests compatible with the Treaty or where the economic operator has shown significant or persistent deficiencies in the performance of a prior concession or concessions of a similar nature with the same contracting authority or contracting entity.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
This Directive shall not affect the right of authorities at every level to decide whether, how and to what extent they shall perform public functions themselves. Authorities may perform public tasks using their own resources without being compelled to award concessions to other (external) economic operators. They may also perform such tasks jointly with other authorities.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The right to exploit the works or services as referred to in points 2, 4 and 7 of the first paragraph shall imply the transfer to the concessionaire of the substantial share of the operating risk. The concessionaire shall be deemed to assume the substantial share of the operating risk where it is not guaranteed to recoup the investments made or the costs incurred in operating the works or the services which are the subject-matter of the concession.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
That economic risk may consist in either of the followe operating risk may, in particular, consist ing:
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the risk related to the use of the works or the demand for the provision of the service, including where such risk is substantially limited, for example by framework provisions under public law in a given Member State; or
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) Permits, authorisations or licences which merely stipulate the conditions for the exercise of an economic activity shall not be deemed concessions. The same applies to agreements between a contracting authority or entity concerning the right of an economic operator to exploit public domains or resources (simple tenancy or land lease contracts, for example) and in which, as a rule, only general conditions for their use are established without the contracting authority becoming the recipient of specific services performed by the contract partner.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the acquisition or rental, rental or leasing by the contracting authority or contracting entity, by whatever financial means, of land, existing buildings or other immovable property or concerning rights thereon; however financial service concessions awarded at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive;
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
This Directive shall not apply to service concessions relating to services of general economic interest and services of general interest, such as: (a) water services; (b) wastewater services; (c) refuse services; (d) energy services; (e) social services, on the basis of the voluntary European quality framework for social services adopted by the Social Protection Committee, in particular in the fields of health and social provision, statutory social insurance, emergency and disaster response services, benefit services and services furnished by trade unions.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
TWhe dun awarding the concession the contracting authority or contraction of the concession shall be limited to the time estimated to be necessary for the concessionaire to recoup the investments made in operating the works or services together with a reasonable return on invested capital. ng entity may, in the light of the nature of the concession and of the proportionality principle, limit its duration. Among the factors that may be considered here is the time estimated to be necessary for the concessionaire to recoup the investments made in operating the works or services. Account may also be taken of other objective criteria such as the public interest in ongoing high-quality provision or environmentally and socially sustainable performance of the service, and the expenditure incurred in selecting a concessionaire.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17
Article 17 Social and other specific services Concessions for social and other specific services listed in Annex X falling within the scope of this Directive shall be subject to the obligation of paragraph 3 of Art. 26 and of paragraph 1 of Article 27.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 34 – paragraph 2 (new)
If, when a concession is awarded, workers are taken over by the new concession holder from an authority, a public contracting body or the previous concession holder, the legal consequences of Directive 2001/23/EC in terms of safeguarding employment and working conditions shall apply in respect of the workers.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) repeated and/or serious breaches of employment, social security or environmental law, established by judgments having the force of res judicata.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 6
6. Any economic operator shall be excluded from participation in a concession where the contracting authority or contracting entity is aware of a decision having the force of res judicata, or of a legally binding administrative decision, establishing that it has not fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social security contributions in accordance with the legal provisions of the country in which it is established or with those of the Member State of the contracting authority or entity, or if such an operator has been the subject on more than one occasion of an unfavourable ruling or penalty under employment law.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States mayshall provide that contracting authorities or contracting entities exclude from participation in a concession award any economic operator if one of the following conditions is fulfilled:
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) breaches of social security, employment, tax or environmental law.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 9
9. Member States shall specify the implementing conditions for this article. They shall make available to other Member States, upon request, any information related to the exclusion grounds listed in this Article. The competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall provide this information in accordance with the provisions of Article 88 of Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC]. The Member States and the Commission shall also develop a procedure for gathering information about breaches of the law and making it available to contracting entities.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 3
3. The contracting authority or the contracting entity shall indicate in the concession notice or documents the relative weighting which it gives to each of the criteria set out in paragraph 1 or list those criteria in descending order of importance.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States mayshall provide that contracting authorities and contracting entities shall base the award of concessions on the criterion of the most economically advantageous tender, in compliance with paragraph 2. Those criteria mayshall include, in addition to price or costs, any of the following criteria
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(da) The contracting authorities or entities shall apply additional social and environmental criteria for the provision of the works and services, which shall be indicated in the notice of the concession. These shall include the employment conditions provided for under national, European Union and international laws and administrative provisions, representative wage agreements at all levels and arbitration awards. The principle of equal pay for equal work in a comparable job shall also apply.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new)
(db) Further social and employment policy criteria may be included, such as the promotion of gender equality and the integration in the labour market of particularly disadvantaged groups including younger and older workers, young people and trainees, the long-term unemployed, people from a migration background and people with disabilities.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the question of the principal economic operator’s liability and subcontractor liability.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Without prejudice to liability in accordance with paragraph 2, the principal economic operator and the subcontractor(s) shall be jointly and severally liable.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. Activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purpose of the provision of airports and maritime or inland ports or other terminal facilitiesgeneral infrastructure to carriers by air, sea or inland waterway.
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/0437(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 10
SERVICES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 17 CPV Code Description 7511000-4 and Health and social services from 85000000-9 to 85323000-9 (except 85321000-5 and 85322000-2) 75121000-0, 75122000-7, 75124000-1 Administrative educational, healthcare and cultural services 75300000-9 Compulsory social security services 75310000-2, 75311000-9, 75312000-6, Benefit services 75313000-3, 75313100-4, 75314000-0, 75320000-5, 75330000-8, 75340000-1 98000000-3 Other community, social and personal services 98120000-0 Services furnished by trade unions 98131000-0 Religious services deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Directive 2005/36/EC only applies to professionals who want to pursue the same profession in another Member State. There are cases where the activities concerned are part of a profession with a larger scope of activities in the host Member State. If the differences between the fields of activity are so large that in reality a full programme of education and training is required from the professional to compensate for shortcomings and if the professional so requests, a host Member State should under these particular circumstances grant partial access. However, in case of overriding reasons of general interest, such as in the case of a doctor of medicine or other health professionals, a Member State should be able to refuse partial accessa Member State should be able to refuse partial access. Partial access should not be granted for professions providing health services or otherwise related to public health.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) The nursing and midwifery professions have significantly evolved in the last three decades: community-based healthcare, the use of more complex therapies and constantly developing technology presuppose a capacity for higher responsibilities for nurses and midwives. In order to prepare them to meet such complex healthcare needs, nursing and midwifery students need to have a solid general education background before they start the training. Therefore, admission to that training should be increased to twelveachieved by at least ten years of general education or success in an examination of an equivalent level.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Whilst the Directive already provides for detailed obligations for Member States to exchange information, such obligations should be reinforced. Member States should not only react to request for information but also alert other Member States in a proactive manner. Such alert system should be similar to that of Directive 2006/123/EC. A specific alert mechanism is however necessary for health professionals benefiting from automatic recognitionregulated under Directive 2005/36/EC. This should also apply to veterinary surgeons unless the Member States have already triggered the alert mechanism provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC. All Member States should be alerted if a professional, due to a disciplinary action or criminal conviction related to the exercise of his or her profession, is no longer entitled to move to another Member State, or if a professional is temporarily or permanently removed from the right to practice in their home or host Member State. This alert should be activated through the IMI regardless of whether the professional has exercised any of the rights under Directive 2005/36/EC or of whether he has applied for recognition of his professional qualifications through the issuance of a European Professional Card or through any other method provided for by that Directive. The alert procedure should comply with Union law on the protection of personal data and other fundamental rights.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of Directive 2005/36/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of updating of Annex I, setting the criteria for the calculation of fees related to the European Professional Card, establishing the details of the documentation necessary for the European Professional Card, the adaptations of the list of activities set out in Annex IV, the adaptations of points 5.1.1 to 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 of Annex V, clarifying the knowledge and skills for medical doctors, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives, pharmacists and architects, adapting the minimum periods of training for specialist medical trainings and specialist dental training, the inclusion in point 5.1.3 of Annex V of new medical specialities, the amendments to the list set out in points 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1 and 5.6.1 of Annex V, inclusion in point 5.3.3 of Annex V of new dental specialities, specifying the conditions of application of common training frameworks, and specifying the conditions of application of common training tests. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate representation and consultations during its preparatory work, including at experts at both European and national level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely, transparent and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4a – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying European Professional Cards for specific professions, following the request of the European sectoral social partners and professional associations representing the sectoral professions to establish a card for a specific profession, establishing the format of the European Professional Card, the translations necessary to support any application for issuing a European Professional Card and details for the assessment of applications, taking into account the particularities of each profession concerned. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 58. The Commission shall consult competent authorities and European and national level social partners and professional associations representing the sectoral professions of the related professions on the precise technicalities of the cards of specific professions.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4a – paragraph 7
7. Any fees which applicants may incur in relation toThe administrative procedures to issue a European Professional Card shall be reasonable, proportionate and commensurate with the costs incurred by the home and host Member States and shall not act as a disincentive to apply for a European Professional Card. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58a concerning the setting of criteria for the calculation and distribution of feesnot represent any additional cost for the individual professional.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4b – paragraph 3
1. TIn sectors others than health and social care, the competent authority of the home Member State shall verify the application, create and validate a European Professional Card within two weeks from the date it receives a complete application. It shall inform the applicant and the Member State in which the applicant envisages to provide services, of the validation of the European Professional Card. The transmission of the validation informThe competent authority of the host Member State shall ensure the prior check of the complete application of the professional for temporary provision of service whether his or her qualifications are in conjunction with the national requirements of the host country on qualifications to the host Member States concerned shall constitute the declaration provided for in Article 7provide the same service. Member States shall provide a list to the Commission on certain professions where working with the temporary mobility card and under the prior declaration regime must require a prior check of application. The host Member State may not require a further declaration under Article 7 for the following two years, unless overriding concerns are expressed.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4b – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts specifying the technical specifications, the measures necessary to ensure integrity, confidentiality and accuracy of information contained in the European Professional Card and in the IMI file, the conditions and the procedures for making available a European Professional Card to its holder, including the possibility of downloading it or submitting updates for the file. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisoryexamination procedure referred to in Article 58.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4d – paragraph 1
1. UIn sectors other than health and social care, upon receipt of a complete application for a European Professional Card, the competent authority of the home Member State shall, within two weeks, verify and confirm the authenticity and validity of the submitted supporting documents, create the European Professional Card, transmit it for validation to the competent authority of the host Member State and inform that authority on the corresponding IMI file. The applicant shall be informed by the home Member State of the state of the procedure.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4d – paragraph 5
5. Where the host Member State fails to take a decision within the time limits set out in the paragraphs 2 and 3 or to request additional information within one month from the date of receipt of the European Professional Card by the home Member State, the European Professional Card shall be deemed to be validated by the host Member State and to constitute recognition of the professional qualification to the regulated profession concerned in the host Member State.deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4e – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities of the home and the host Member States shall update in a timely manner the corresponding IMI file with information regarding disciplinary action or criminal sanctions taken or any other serious specific circumstances which are likely to have consequences for the pursuit of activities of the holder of the European Professional Card under this Directive. Such updates include the deletion of information which is no longer required. Any updates should be based on a prior decision by a court or a competent authority prohibiting a professional to pursue his or her professional activity. The holder of the European Professional Card and the competent authorities involved in the corresponding IMI file shall be informed of any updates by the competent authorities concerned.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4e – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the conditions of access to the IMI file, the technical means and the procedures for the verification referred to in the first subparagraph. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisoryexamination procedure referred to in Article 58.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4f – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent authority of the host Member State shall grant partial access to a professional activity in its territory, after consulting with the relevant national social partners and professional associations representing the sectoral professions of the sector the profession of the applicant belongs to, provided that the following conditions are fulfilled:
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4f – paragraph 2
2. The concept of partial access shall not apply to the sectoral professions falling under the regime of automatically recognised professions and for health professions in general. Partial access may be rejected if such rejection is justified by an overriding reason of general interest, such as public health, it would secure the attainment of the objective pursued and it would not go beyond what is strictly necessary.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4f – paragraph 3
3. Applications for establishment in the host Member State shall be examined in accordance with Chapters I and IV of Title III by the competent authorities together with the relevant social partners and professional associations representing the sectoral professions in case of establishment in the host Member State.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
For the first provision of services, in the case of regulated professions having public health or safety implications, which do not benefit from automatic recognition under Chapter II or III of Title III , the competent authority of the host Member State may check the professional qualifications of the service provider prior to the first provision of services. Such a prior check shall be possible only where the purpose of the check is to avoid serious damage to the health or safety of the service recipient due to a lack of professional qualification of the service provider and where this does not go beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall notify to the Commission the list of professions for which a prior check of qualifications is necessary in order to avoid serious damage to the health or safety of the service recipient under its national laws and regulations. Member States shall provide the Commission with a specific justification for the inclusion of each of those professions in the list.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
2011/0435(COD)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 - subparagraph 3
Within a maximum of one month of receipt of the declaration and accompanying documents, the competent authority shall inform the service provider either of its decision not to check his qualifications or of the outcome of such check. Where there is a difficulty which would result in delay, the competent authority shall notify the service provider within the first month of the reason for the delay. The difficulty shall be solved within one monthas quickly as possible following that notification and the decision finalised within the second month following resolution of the difficulty.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
2011/0435(COD)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
In the absence of a reaction of the competent authority within the deadlines set in the third and fourth subparagraphs, the service may be provided.deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 22
For the purposes of point (b) of the first paragraph, as from [insert date - the day after the date set out in first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Article 3] and every five years thereafter, the competent authorities in Member States shall submit publicly available reports to the Commission and to the other Member States on their continuing education and training procedures related to doctors of medicine, medical specialists, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, specialised dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives and pharmacists. Member States must have systems in place to ensure that health professionals can regularly update their skills trough continuous professional development. The onus shall be on employers to ensure that sufficient supports, practical, financial and other, are in place to allow employees to fully engage and comply with continuous professional development requirements.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point a
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. Admission to training for nurses responsible for general care shall be contingent upon completion of general education of 12at least 10 years, as attested by a diploma, certificate or other evidence issued by the competent authorities or bodies in a Member State or by a certificate attesting success in an examination, of an equivalent level, for admission to a school of nursing.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 – point b
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) completion of at least the 120 years of general school education or a certificate attesting success in an examination, of an equivalent level, for admission to a midwifery school for route I;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49bis – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the common training framework has been prepared following a transparent due process, including with national social partners, professional associations representing the sectoral professions, and stakeholders from Member States where the profession is regulated or not regulated;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49ter – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the common training test has been prepared following a transparent due process, including with national social partners, professional associations representing the sectoral professions, and stakeholders from Member States where the profession is regulated or not regulated;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A Member State shall ensure that any controls of the knowledge of a language are carried out by a competent authority free of charge for the applicant after the decisions referred to in Articles 4d, 7(4) and 51(3) have been taken and if there is a serious and concrete doubt about the professional's sufficient language knowledge in respect of the professional activities this person intends to pursue.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In case of professions with public health and patient safety implications, Member States may confer to the competent authorities the right to carry out language checking covering all professionals concerned if it is expressly requested by the national health care system, or in case of self-employed professionals not affiliated to the nationals health care system, by representative national patient organisations.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 56a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent authorities of a Member State shall inform the competent authorities of all other Member States and the Commission about the identity of a professional who has been prohibited by national authorities or courts from pursuing, even temporarily, on the territory of thatemporarily or permanently removed from the right to practice in their home or host Member State the following professional activities:
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 56a – paragraph 1 – point ca (new)
(c a) nurses recognised under the scope of Article 10;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the recognition of professional qualifications, ensuring appropriate representation and consultation at both European and national expert level. That Committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Ambiguity exists as to whether Member States may require the takeover of staff upon a change of provider for groundhandling services to which access is limited. Discontinuity of staff can have a detrimental effect on the quality of groundhandling services. It is therefore appropriate to clarify the rules onbsolutely essential to ensure the takeover of staff beyond the application of Directive 2001/23/EC on transfers of undertakings enabling Member States to ensure adequate employment and working conditions.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In a labour-intensive sector such as groundhandling, continuous staff development and training have a strong impact on service quality. Minimum training requirements should therefore be set to ensure the quality of operations in terms of reliability, resilience, safety and security, and to create a level playing field among operators. The European Aviation Safety Agency should be entrusted with the task of developing minimum standards for education and training which the Member States can and should follow. This task should be included in Regulation No 216/2008.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Member States should retain the power to ensure that an adequate level of social protection is guaranteed for the staff of undertakings providing groundhandling services.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) This also involves applying representative collective agreements for the various airports in relation to pay and other employment conditions.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Where, following the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10, a supplier of groundhandling services mentioned in paragraph 1 loses its authorisation to provide these services, Member States may require supplier(s) of groundhandling services which subsequently provide these services to grant staff previously hired to provide these services the rights to which they would have been entitled if there had been a transfer within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/23/EC17. These rights include the mandatory application of the representative collective agreements.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2011/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
An undertaking applying for an approval shall demonstrate that its employees have the qualification, professional experience and length of service necessary for the performance of the activity it applies for. Where European minimum standards are developed as recommendations for education and training, Member States should use these as a guide in order to ensure the highest possible safety standards throughout Europe.
2012/06/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2011/0370(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Treaty aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and confers on the Union the task, inter alia, of contributing to the flowering of cultures of Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time ensuring that the conditions necessary for the competitiveness of the Union’s industry exist. In this respect, the Union, where necessary, supports and supplements Member States’ actions to respect cultural and linguistic diversity, strengthen the competitiveness of the European cultural and creative sectors as vectors of social and economic development and facilitate adaptation to industrial changes, in particular through vocational training.
2012/06/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2011/0370(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) In the context of the application of the programme, it is important to monitor the quality of the jobs created in the cultural and creative sectors, since these sectors are often characterised by insecure, unstable labour relations.
2012/06/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2011/0370(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 b (new)
(30b) The implementation of the programme should be accompanied by dialogue with all stakeholders in the cultural and creative sectors, including actors from civil society and from the non-commercial sector.
2012/06/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/0370(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) to strengthen the competitiveness of the cultural and creative sectors with a view to promotingin their entirety in order to participate in European social and economic development and promote smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
2012/06/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2011/0370(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) to strengthen the financial capacity of the cultural and creative sectors, and in particular small and medium-sized enterprises and organisations, particularly organisations from the public and non- commercial sectors;
2012/06/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Equality, Rights and Citizenship Programme
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Citizens and businesses should also benefit fully from the internal market. Consumers should be able to enjoy the rights deriving from the consumer legislation and businesses should be supported to exercise the freedom to conduct business in the internal market. The development of contract and consumer legislative instruments provides practical solutions for businesses and consumers to address cross-border problems, aiming to offer them more choices and to make it less costly for them to conclude contracts with partners in another Member State, while providing a high level of consumer protection.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the European Union Programme on Equality, Rights and Citizenship, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Programme’.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to contribute to enhancing the exercise of rights deriving from the citizenship of the Union and from the legislation of the Union for the protection of third country nationals;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to promote the effective implementation of the principles of non discrimination on theany grounds of, including sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation or gender identity, including equality between women and men and the rights of persons with disabilities and of the elderly;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) to promote equality between women and men, including through combating violence against women, children and other groups at risk;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(d b) to promote synergies between the fight against poverty and social exclusion and the fight against discrimination and in favour of greater equality;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to empower consumers and businesses to trade and purchase in trust within the internal market by enforcing the rights deriving from the Union consumer legislation and by supporting the freedom to conduct business in the internal market through cross-border transactions.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) promoting transnational cooperation and building up of mutual knowledge and mutual trust among all involved stakeholders, including social partners;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) Training activities, such as staff exchanges, workshops, seminars, train-the- trainers events, development of online/other training modules;. These activities should include a gender dimension and an anti-discrimination perspective.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In accordance with Article 148(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Council adopted guidelines for employment policies on 21 October 2010, which, together with the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the Union adopted in accordance with Article 121 of the Treaty, comprise the Europe 2020 integrated guidelines. The Programme should contribute to applychieving the Europe 2020 integrated guidelines, and in particular Guidelines 7, 8 and 10, while supporting implementation of the flagship initiatives, with special regard to the European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclustargets with special regard to poverty reduction, an Agenda for New Skills and Jobs, and Youth on the Mod employment objectives.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Progress towards a social and environmental sustainable development in Europe will need the anticipation and development of new skills and competencies, improving the conditions for job creation, the quality of employment and working conditions through accompanying education, labour market and social policies in the transformation of industries and services towards that end. The Programme should therefore contribute to promoting the creation of sustainable 'green' and 'white' high quality employment, the anticipation and development of new skills and competencies for new high quality jobs by linking employment and social policies with industrial and structural policies supporting a transition towards a resource-efficient and low carbon economy. In particular, the Programme should act as a catalyst for exploring the job creation potential of public sector led green and social investments and of local and regional employment initiatives.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Union should equip itself with a sound analytical basis, especially focussing on the impact of the crisis, to support policy- making in the employment and social area. Such an evidence base adds value to national action by providing a Union dimension and comparison for data- gathering and the development of statistical tools and methods and common indicators with a view to composing a full picture of the situation in the fields of employment, social policy and working conditions across the Union and ensuring high-quality evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of programmes and policies.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Ensuring that minimum standards are in place and that working conditions improve constantly in the Union is a central feature of Union social policy. The Union has an important role to play both in ensuring that the legislative framework is adapted, in line with ‘Smart Regulation’'good work' principles, to evolving work patterns and new health and safety risks and in financing measures to improve compliance with ILO labour standards, the UN and ILO 'Decent Work' Agenda and Union rules on the protection of workers' rights.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) EURES' scope should be widened to develop and support targeted mobility schemes at Union level with a view to filling vacancies where labour market shortcomings have been identified. In accordance with Article 47 of the Treaty, the scheme should facilitate mobility among young workers.deleted
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Europe 2020 Strategy, and in particular Guideline 7, identifies self- employment and entrepreneurship as crucial to achieving smart, sustainable and inclusive growth9 .deleted
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The Social enterprises areEconomy is a cornerstone of Europe's pluralist social market economy. Theysocial models. It can act as a drivers of social changeprogress by offering innovative solutions, and therefore make a valuable contribution to meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategypromoting inclusive labour markets and social services accessible to all. The programme should improve the social enterpriseconomy organisations' access to finance and thereby contribute to the Social Business Initiative launched by the Commission11 .
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to capitalise on the experience of international financial institutions, and in particular the European Investment Bank Group, action involving microfinance and the social entrepreneurshipconomy should be implemented by the Commission indirectly by entrusting budget implementations tasks to financial institutions in accordance with the financial regulation. Using Union resources concentrates leverage from international financial institutions and other investors, unifies approaches and thus improves access to finance for micro- enterprises, including the self-employed and social enterpriseconomy organisations. The Union contribution thus assists in the development of the emerging social business sectorsocial economy and the microfinance market in the Union and encourages cross- border activities. The Union's actions should be complementary to the Member States' use of financial instruments for microfinance and the social economy. The entities entrusted with the implementation of the actions should ensure added value and avoid duplication of financing through Union resources.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission with a view to ensuring there are uniform conditions for implementing actions under the EURES and the Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship axes of the Programme.deleted
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'Social enterprise’ means an enterprise whose primary objective is to achieve social impact rather than generate prconomy' means the sector of economic activity producing goods and providing services composed of a set of organisations that do not belong to the public sector or the for-profit private sector. These organisations operate under democratic control of it for owners and stakeholders. It operates in the market through the production of goods and services in an entrepreneurial and innovative way, and uses surpluses mainly to achieve social goals. It iss membership, combine the interests of members and users and/or the general interest and use the surpluses of its economic activity in pursuit of sustainable development and social objectives, services of interest to members or to general public, including voluntary not-for-profit organisations that are producers of non-market services for households. Organisations of the social economy (e.g. cooperatives, mutual societies and associations) are managed in an accountable and transparent way, in particular by involving workers, customers and stakeholders affected by its businesstheir activityies.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) The Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurshipconomy axis, which shall facilitate access to finance for entrepreneurs, especially those furthest from the labour market, and social enterprises. (Horizontal amendment: the term 'Social entrepreneurship' should be replaced with 'Social Economy' through the whole document.)
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) The Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurshipconomy axis, which shall facilitate access to finance for entrepreneurs, especially those furthest from the labour market, and social enterprises.conomy organisations. (Horizontal amendment: the term 'social enterprises' should be replaced with 'social economy organisations ' through the whole document.)
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) The Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurshipconomy axis, which shall facilitate access to, and increase the availability of, finance for potential entrepreneurs, especially those furthest from the labour market, and social enterpriseunemployed, socially excluded and vulnerable people, as well as existing micro-enterprises and social economy organisations.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Support the development of adequate, accessible and efficient high quality social protection systems and labour markets and facilitate policy reform, by promoting, protecting beneficiaries from poverty, and inclusive labour markets in order to ensure social inclusion and a high level of high-quality employment and facilitate social progress, by promoting participation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations and people experiencing poverty and social exclusion as well as good and decent work, good governance, mutual learning and social innovation;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ModernisImprove Union law in line with the Smart Regulation"good work" principles and ensure that Union law on matters relating to working conditions is effectively applied;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) Promote the creation of sustainable 'green' and 'white' high quality jobs and the anticipation and development of new skills and competencies towards that end by linking employment and social policies with industrial and structural policies supporting a transition towards a resource-efficient and low carbon economy and a environmental and social sustainable development;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) PromoFacilitate workers' voluntary geographical mobility, especially in border regions by supporting cross-border partnerships, cross-border social dialogue and also counselling and information for jobseekers, mobile workers and employers, and boost employment opportunities by developing Unionhigh-quality inclusive labour markets that are open and accessible to all;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) Promote employment and social inclusion by increasing the availability and accessibility of microfinance for vulnerable groups andunemployed, socially excluded and vulnerable people who wish to start up a micro-enterprise as well as for existing micro-enterprises, and by increasing access to finance for the social enterprises.conomy organisations;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 60% to the Progress axis, of which at least 1760% shall be allocated to promoting social experimentation as a method for testing and evaluating innovative solutions with a viewsocial protection, social inclusion and the reduction and prevention of poverty and at least 15 % to fighting youth unemployment; at least 15% up to a maximum of 17% of the budget for this axis shall be allocated to promoting social policy experimentation; funding shall be made available to scmaling them up; l, medium-sized and large projects alike;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 263 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 15% to the EURES axis, of which at least 10% shall be allocated to targeted mobility schemes, at least 40% to cross- border partnerships, and at least 20% to the training and qualification of EURES personnel;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Provide policy-makers with financial support to test social and labour market policy reformsanticipate and develop the job creation potential and skills needs for a transition towards a resource-efficient and low carbon economy as well as environmental and social sustainable development, to test social and labour market policies accordingly to deliver on improving the quality of jobs and social protection, build up the main actors' capacity to design and implement social policy experimentation linked to those objectives and social progress, and make the relevant knowledge and expertise accessible;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The ESF should improve employment opportunities, promote education and life- long learning and, develop active inclusion policies in accordanceand fight poverty and social exclusion in accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty and with the tasks entrusted to the ESF by Article 162 of the Treaty, and thereby contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion in accordance with Article 174 of the Treaty. In accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty, the ESF should take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against poverty and social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 34 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The Member States and the Commission should ensure that the implementation of the priorities financed by the ESF contribute to the promotion of equality between women and men in accordance with Article 8 of the Treaty. Evaluations have shown the importance of taking the gender aspect into account in all dimensions of programmes including their preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation in a timely and consistent manner, while ensuring that specific actions are taken to promote gender equality.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 41 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Member States and regions should be encouraged to leverage the ESF through financial instruments in order to support for example students, job creation, mobility of workers, social inclusion and social entrepreneurship. The provision of subsidies should always be retained as an option and it should be the responsibility of those involved on the ground to use the funding mix best suited to regional needs.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 44 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. It shall do so by supporting Member States in pursuing the priorities andat least the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The ESF shall support the design and implementation of policies and actions, taking account of the integrated guidelines for the economic and employment policies of Member States and the Council Recommendations on the National Reform Programmesconcept of 'good work' and ensuring that activities supported by the ESF contribute to implementing the UN and ILO Decent Work Agenda in all its aspects. All policies and actions supported by the ESF shall strictly respect International Labour Standards and ILO Conventions, and in particular the commitment to promote full, productive and freely chosen employment as laid down by ILO Convention No. 122.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 54 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the strategy and actions set out in the Operational Programmes are consistent and focused on addressing the challenges identifiposed inby the National Reform Programmes and the relevant Council Recommendations made under Article 148(4) of the Treatytransition towards environmental and socially sustainable development, in order to contribute to achieving at least the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy on employment, education and poverty reduction.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 58 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. At least 230 % of the total ESF resources in each Member State shall be allocated to the thematic objective ‘promoting social inclusion and combating poverty’ set out in Article 9(9) of Regulation (EU) No […].
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16a Specific provisions on conditionalities For the purposes of this Regulation: (a) by way of derogation from Article 17(5) of Regulation (EU) No [...] , ex ante conditionalities shall not apply to the suspension of payments from the ESF; (b) by way of derogation from Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No [...], conditionality linked to the coordination of Member States' economic policies shall not apply to the suspension of payments from the ESF.
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 85 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) This Directive is intended to facilitate the over-arching goals of the Union's energy and climate policies. The introduction of the aviation sector into the EU Emission Trading Scheme through Directive 2008/101/EC is a reflection of the ambition to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from this sector. In the event that, by 31 December 2011, no international agreement has been reached that includes international maritime emissions and contains ambitious reduction targets, the Commission should make a proposal to include such emissions within the Union's greenhouse gas reduction commitment. Taxing energy products used in aviation and maritime activities in the same manner as other energy products is essential for the energy independence of the Union and as an incentive for energy efficiency. Steps must be taken to ensure that the application of these taxation measures will not be paid for by consumers, i.e. that the cost will not be passed on to them.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) Every five years and for the first time by the end of 2015, the Commission should report to the Council on the application of this Directive, examining in particular the minimum level of CO2-related taxation in the light of the evolution of the market price in the EU of the emission allowances, the impact of innovation and technological developments and the justification for the tax exemptions and reductions laid down in this Directive, including for fuel used for the purpose of air and maritime navigation. This report should include an overview of existing taxation provisions contained in bilateral air service agreements. The list of sectors or sub- sectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage shall be the subject of regular review, in particular taking into account the availability of emerging evidence.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 160 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 11 – point a – point ii a (new)
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – points b and c
(iia) points (b) and (c) are deleted.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 168 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 11 – point a a (new)
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 14 – paragraph 2
(aa) Paragraph 2 is deleted.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 29 – paragraph 2
The report by the Commission shall, inter alia, examine the minimum level of CO2- related taxation, the impact of innovation and technological developments, in particular as regards energy efficiency, the use of electricity in transport and the justification for the exemptions and reductions, including for fuel used for the purpose of air and maritime navigation, laid down in this Directive. The report shall also include an overview of existing taxation provisions contained in bilateral air service agreements. The report shall take into account the proper functioning of the internal market, the real value of the minimum levels of taxation and the wider objectives of the Treaty.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) On the other hand, the existence of 27 different corporate tax systems offers companies that operate across borders considerable scope for tax avoidance and tax evasion. This state of affairs is imposing a substantial burden on state budgets. It also runs counter to the priorities set in the Commission Communication of 3 March 2010 entitled 'Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' and cannot be reconciled with the requirements of a social market economy.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) National budgets are facing the ever more serious consequences of the ruinous tax competition among the EU Member States. Excessive state indebtedness is one of the main causes of the current economic and financial crisis. For that reason, the introduction of a lower limit of 25 % for corporation tax is both objectively justified and appropriate. Since the Member States' freedom to set taxes would not otherwise be affected, such a step would be consistent with the subsidiarity principle.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 34 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) A system allowingunder which companies to treat the Union as a single market for the purpose of corporate tax would facilitate cross-border activity for companies resident in the Union and would promote the objective of making the Union a more competitive location for investment internationally. Such a system would best be achieved by enablrequiring groups of companies with a taxable presence in more than one Member State to settle their tax affairs in the Union according to a single set of rules for calculation of the tax base and to deal with a single tax administration ('one-stop-shop'). These rules should also be made available to entities subject to corporate tax in the Union which do not form part of a group.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Since differences in rates of taxation do not give rise to the same obstacles, the system (the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)) need not fundamentally affect the discretion of Member States regarding their national rate(s) of company taxation, provided that the minimum rates of taxation set in the Union are not undercut.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Since such a system is primarily designed to serve the needs of companies that operate across borders, it should be an optional scheme, accompany and to prevent tax evasion and tax avoidance more effectively, it should be a mandatory scheme, replacing the existing national corporate tax systems for the companies in question.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 63 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Income consisting in dividends, the proceeds from the disposal of shares held in a company outside the group and the profits of foreign permanent establishments should be exempt. In giving relief for double taxation most Member States exempt dividends and proceeds from the disposals of shares since it avoids the need of computing the taxpayer's entitlement to a credit for the tax paid abroad, in particular where such entitlement must take account of the corporation tax paid by the company distributing dividends. The exemption of income earned abroad meets the same need for simplicity.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Income consisting in interest and royalty payments should be taxable, with credit for withholding tax paid on such payments. Contrary to the case of dividends, there is no difficulty in computing such a credit, dividends, proceeds from the sale of shares in a company not belonging to the group and profits generated by plants located abroad should be taxable, with credit for withholding tax paid on such payments.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Taxable revenues should be reduced by business expenses and certain other items. Deductible business expenses should normally include all costs relating to sales and expenses linked to the production, maintenance and securing of income. Deductibility should be extended to costs of research and development, provided that the money saved is used to procure or manufacture economic goods, and costs incurred in raising equity or debt for the purposes of the business. There should also be a list of non-deductible expenses.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Taxpayers should be allowed to carry losses forward indefinitelyfor a maximum of seven years, but no loss carry-back should be allowed. The deductibility of losses carried forward should be limited to a set percentage of annual income. Since carry- forward of losses is intended to ensure that a taxpayer pays tax on its real income, there is nbut also to make state income from corporation tax more consistent and calculable and to prevent tax evasion to place a time limit on carry forwand fraud in connection with the setting-off against tax of revenue from plants and subsidiaries in third countries, a time limit and a minimum rate of taxation are necessardy. Loss carry back is relatively rare in the practice of the Member States, and leads to excessive complexity.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Eligibility for consolidation (group membership) should be determined in accordance with a two-part test based on (i) control (more than 520% of voting rights) and (ii) ownership (more than 725% of equity) or rights to profits (more than 725% of rights giving entitlement to profit). Such a test ensures a highsufficient level of economic integration between group members, as indicated by a relation of control and a highcorresponding level of participation. The two thresholds should be met throughout the tax year; otherwise, the company should leave the group immediately. There should also be a nine- month minimum requirement for group membership.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 76 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) When withholding taxes are charged on interest, dividends and royalty payments made by taxpayers, the proceeds of such taxes should be shared according to the formula of that tax year. When withholding taxes are charged on dividends distributed by taxpayers, the proceeds of such taxes should not be shared since, contrary to interest and royalties, dividends have not led to a previous deduction borne by all group companies.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 77 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) The system should include a general anti-abuse rule, supplemented by measures designed to curb specific types of abusive practices. These measures should include limitationsa ban on the deductibility of interest paid to associated enterprises resident for tax purposes in a low-tax country outside the Union which does not exchange information with the Member State of the payer based on an agreement comparable to Council Directive 2011/16/EU concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation and taxation of insurance premiums and rules on controlled foreign companies.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The formula for apportioning the consolidated tax base should comprise three equally weighted factors (labour, assets and sales). The labour factor should be computed on the basis of payroll and the number of employees (each item counting for half). The asset factor should consist of all fixed tangible assets. Intangibles and financial assets should be excluded from the formula due to their mobile nature and the risks of circumventing the system. The use of these factors is designed to gives appropriate weight to the interests of the Member State of origin. Finally, sales should be taken into account in order to ensure fair participation of the Member State of destination. TEvery three years those factors and weightings should be assessed in order to determine whether they ensure that profits are taxed where they are earned. As an exception to the general principle, where the outcome of the apportionment does not fairly represent the extent of business activity, a safeguard clause provides for an alternative method.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 83 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Groups of companies should be able to deal with a single tax administration ('principal tax authority'), which should be that of the Member State in which the parent company of the group ('principal taxpayer') is resident for tax purposes. The activities of the Member States' tax authorities should be coordinated, supported and assessed by a European Tax Authority. This Directive should also lay down procedural rules for the administration of the system. It should also provide for an advance ruling mechanism. Audits should be initiated and coordinated by the principal tax authority but the authorities of any Member State in which a group member is subject to tax may requestinsist on the initiation of an audit. TDisputes between the competent authority of the Member State in which a group member is resident or established may challenge a decision ofand the principal tax authority concerning the notice to opt or an amended assessment before the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authorityshall be dealt with by the European Tax Authority, which is competent to hear appeals at first instance. Disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities should be dealt with by an administrative body which is competent to hear appeals at first instance according to the law of the Member State of the principal tax authority.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 94 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive establishes a system for a common base for the taxation of certain companies and groups of companies and a minimum European rate of corporation tax and lays down rules relating to the calculation and use of that base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 119 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 15
(15) 'financial assets' means shares in affiliated undertakings, loans to affiliated undertakings, participating interests, loans to undertakings with which the company is linked by virtue of participating interests, investments held as fixed assets, other loans, and own shares to the extent that national law permitsuniform Union rules authorise their being shown in the balance sheet;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Chapter 3 – title
OPTING FORTAXPAYERS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM PROVIDED FOR BY THIS DIRECTIVE
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 128 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – title
OptingTaxpayers
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 134 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. A company to which this Directive applies which is resident for tax purposes in a Member State may opt foshall be a taxpayer under the system provided for by this Directive under the conditions provided for therein.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. A company to which this Directive applies which is not resident for tax purposes in a Member State may opt foshall be a taxpayer under the system provided for by this Directive under the conditions laid down therein in respect of a permanent establishment maintained by it in a Member State.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 145 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Where a company qualifies and opts for the system provided for by this Directive and is therefore a taxpayer it shall cease to be subject to the national corporate tax arrangements in respect of all matters regulated by this Directive unless otherwise stated.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10a (new)
Minimum rate of taxation A minimum rate of taxation of corporations shall apply on the territory of the European Union. The nominal rate must not, however, be less than 25 %. Member States shall otherwise be free to set rates.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 147 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) received profit distributions;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 150 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
d) proceeds from a disposal of shares;eleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 152 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e
e) income of a permanent establishment in a third country.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 153 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Deductible expenses shall include all costs of sales and expenses net of deductible value added tax incurred by the taxpayer with a view to obtaining or securing income, including costs of research and development, provided the money saved is used to procure or manufacture economic goods, and costs incurred in raising equity or debt for the purposes of the business.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 159 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1
1. Fixed assets other than those referred to in Articles 36 and 40 shall be depreciated together in one asset pool at an annual rate of 250% of the depreciation base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 160 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. A loss incurred by a taxpayer or a permanent establishment of a non-resident taxpayer in a fiscal year may be deducted in the seven subsequent tax years, unless otherwise provided by this Directive. Above a threshold figure of EUR 1 million, the loss carried forward shall be limited to 60% of annual income in excess of EUR 1 million.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 165 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 1
When a taxpayer opts to applis covered by the system provided for by this Directive, all assets and liabilities shall be recognised at their value as calculated according to national tax rules immediately prior to the date on which it begins to apply the system, unless otherwise stated in this Directive.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 168 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 46 – paragraph 1
Revenues and expenses which pursuant to Article 24(2) and (3) are considered to have accrued or been incurred before the taxpayer opted intowas covered by the system provided for by this Directive but were not yet included in the tax base under the national corporate tax law previously applicable to the taxpayer shall be added to or deducted from the tax base, as the case may be, in accordance with the timing rules of national law.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 172 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 46 – paragraph 2
Revenues which were taxed under national corporate tax law before the taxpayer opted intowas covered by the system in an amount higher than that which would have been included in the tax base under Article 24(2) shall be deducted from the tax base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 173 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 47 – paragraph 1
1. Provisions, pension provisions and bad- debt deductions provided for in Articles 25, 26 and 27 shall be deductible only to the extent that they arise from activities or transactions carried out after the taxpayer opted intowas covered by the system provided for by this Directive.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 176 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. Expenses incurred in relation to activities or transactions carried out before the taxpayer opted intowas covered by the system but for which no deduction had been made shall be deductible.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 181 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 48 – paragraph 1
Where a taxpayer incurred losses before opting into the system provided for by this Directive applied to it which could be carried forward under the applicable national law but had not yet been set off against taxable profits, those losses may be deducted from the tax base to the extent provided for under that national law.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 49 – paragraph 1
When a taxpayer leavesthe legal form of an undertaking changes so that it is no longer covered by the provisions of the system provided for by this Directive, its assets and liabilities shall be recognised at their value as calculated according to the rules of the system, unless otherwise stated in this Directive.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 194 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 50 – paragraph 1
When a taxpayer leavesthe legal form of an undertaking changes so that it is no longer covered by the provisions of the system provided for by this Directive, its asset pool under the system provided for by this Directive shall be recognised, for the purpose of the national tax rules subsequently applicable, as one asset pool which shall be depreciated on the declining balance method at an annual rate of 25%.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 199 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 51 – paragraph 1
After the taxpayer leavesWhen the legal form of an undertaking changes so that it is no longer covered by the provisions of the system, revenues and expenses arising from long- term contracts shall be treated in accordance with the national corporate tax law subsequently applicable. However, revenues and expenses already taken into account for tax purposes in the system provided for by this Directive shall not be taken into account again.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 52 – paragraph 1
After the taxpayer leavesIf the legal form of an entity changes so that it is no longer covered by the provisions of the system provided for by this Directive, expenses which have already been deducted in accordance with Articles 25 to 27 may not be deducted again.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a right to exercise more than 520% of the voting rights;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 214 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an ownership right amounting to more than 725% of the company’s capital or more than 725% of the rights giving entitlement to profit.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) entitlement to profit and ownership of capital shall be calculated by multiplying the interests held in intermediate subsidiaries at each tier. Ownership rights amounting to 725% or less held directly or indirectly by the parent company, including rights in companies resident in a third country, shall also be taken into account in the calculation.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 72
Exemption with progression Without prejudice to Article 75, revenue which is exempt from taxation under Article 11(c), (d) or (e) may be taken into account in determining the tax rate applicable to a taxpayer.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 252 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 73
Switch-over clause Article 11(c), (d) or (e) shall not apply where the entity which made the profit distributions, the entity the shares in which are disposed of or the permanent establishment were subject, in the entity’s country of residence or the country in which the permanent establishment is situated, to one of the following: (a) a tax on profits, under the general regime in that third country, at a statutory corporate tax rate lower than 40% of the average statutory corporate tax rate applicable in the Member States; (b) a special regime in that third country that allows for a substantially lower level of taxation than the general regime. The average statutory corporate tax rate applicable in the Member States shall be published by the Commission annually. It shall be calculated as an arithmetic average. For the purpose of this Article and Articles 81 and 82, amendments to the rate shall first apply to taxpayers in their tax year starting after the amendment.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 271 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a tax on profits is provided for, under the general regime in the third country, at a statutory corporate tax rate lower than 40% of the average statutory corporate tax rate applicable in the Member Statesthe minimum corporate tax rate provided for by this Directive;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, iInterest paid to an entity resident in a third country with which there is no agreement on the exchange of information comparable to the exchange of information on request provided for in Directive 2011/16/EU shall be deductible, in an amount not exceeding that which would be stipulated between independent enterprises, where one of the following conditions is met:not be deductible.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 276 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the amount of that interest is included in the tax base as income of the associated enterprise in accordance with Article 82;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 277 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the interest is paid to a company whose principal class of shares is regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 278 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the interest is paid to an entity engaged, in its country of residence, in the active conduct of a trade or business. This shall be understood as an independent economic enterprise carried on for profit and in the context of which officers and employees carry out substantial managerial and operational activities.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 279 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The tax base shall, proportionately, include the non- distributed income of an entity resident in a third country where the following conditions are met:
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 280 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the taxpayer by itself, or together with its associated enterprises, holds a direct or indirect participation of more than 520% of the voting rights, or owns more than 520% of capital or is entitled to receive more than 520% of the profits of that entity;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 281 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) under the general regime in the third country, profits are taxable at a statutory corporate tax rate lower than 40% of the averagthe statutory minimum corporate tax rate applicable in the Member States, or the entity is subject to a special regime that allows for a substantially lower level of taxation than that of the general regime;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 298 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 90 – paragraph 3
3. The definition of an employee shall be determined by the national law of the Member State where the employment is exercisedat EU level.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 307 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 94 – paragraph 1
1. Land and other non-depreciable fixed tangible assets shall be valued at their original costcurrent market value.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 325 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – title
Notice to optconcerning the applicability of the system
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 327 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A single taxpayer shall opt forbe subject to the system provided for by this Directive by giving notice toas a result of a notification to that effect by the competent authority of the Member State in which it is resident or, in respect of a permanent establishment of a non-resident taxpayer, that establishment is situated. In the case of a group, the principal taxpayer authority shall give notice, on behalf of the group, to the principal tax authoritythe notification.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 329 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Such notice shall be given at least three months before the beginning of the tax year in which the taxpayer or the group wishes required to begin applying the system.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 331 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – paragraph 2
2. The notice to opt shall cover all group members. However, shipping companies subject to a special taxation regime may be excluded from the group.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 333 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104 – paragraph 3
3. The principal tax authority shall transmit the notice to opt immediately to the competent authorities of all Member States in which group members are resident or established. Those authorities may submit to the principal tax authority, within one month of the transmission, their views and any relevant information on the validity and scope of the notice to opt.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 339 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 105 – paragraph 1
1. When the notice to opt has been acceptdelivered, a single taxpayer or a group, as the case may be, shall apply the system provided for by this Directive for five tax years. Following the expiry of that initial term, the single taxpayer or the group shall continue to apply the system for successive terms of three tax years unless the tax authority gives notice of termination. A notice of termination may be given by a taxpayer to its competentthe tax authority or, in the case of a group, by the principal taxpayer to the principal tax authority in the three months preceding the end of the initial term or of a subsequent term.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 343 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 105 – paragraph 2
2. Where a taxpayer or a non-taxpayer joins a group, the term of the group shallDoes not be affected. Where a group joins another group or two or more groups merge, the enlarged group shall continue to apply the system until the later of the expiry dates of the terms of the groups, unless exceptional circumstances make it more appropriate to apply a shorter period the English version.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 349 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 106 – title
Information in the notice to opt
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 351 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The following information shall be included in the notice to opt:
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 358 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 106 – paragraph 2
The Commission mayshall adopt an act establishing a standard form of the notice to opt. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 131(2).
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 363 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 107 – title
Control of the notice to opt
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 365 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 107 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority to which the notice to opt is validly submitted shall examine whether, on the basis of the information contained in the notice, the group fulfils the requirements of this Directive. Unless the notice is rejected within three months of its receipt, it shall be deemed to have been accepted.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 367 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 107 – paragraph 2
2. Provided that the taxpayer has fully disclosed all relevant information in accordance with Article 106, any subsequent determination that the disclosed list of group members is incorrect shall not invalidate the notice to opt. The notice shall be corrected, and all other necessary measures shall be taken, from the beginning of the tax year when the discovery is made. Where there has not been full disclosure, the principal tax authority, in agreement with the other competent authorities concerned, may invalidate the original notice to opt.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 369 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 108 – paragraph 2
2. In the year in which it joins an existing group, a taxpayer shall bring its tax year into line with that of the group. The apportioned share of the taxpayer for that tax year shall be calculated proportionately having regard to the number of calendar months during which the company belonged to the groupDoes not affect the English version.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 370 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 108 – paragraph 4
4. Where a single taxpayer joins a group, it shall be treated as though its tax year terminated on the day before joiningDoes not affect the English version.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 379 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 115 – title
Central authority for the coordination and management of a central data base
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 380 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 115 – paragraph -1 (new)
A central tax authority for the European Union shall be established. It shall coordinate the activities of the tax authorities of the Member States in accordance with this Directive and shall manage a central data base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 381 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 115 – paragraph 1
The consolidated tax return and supporting documents filed by the principal taxpayer shall be stored on athis central data base, to which all the competent authorities shall have access. The central data base shall be regularly updated with all further information and documents and all decisions and notices issued by the principal tax authority.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 383 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 116 – paragraph 2
In exceptional circumstances the competent tax authorities of the Member States in which the members of a group are resident or in which they have a permanent establishment may, within six months of the notice to opt or within six months of a reorganisation involving the principal taxpayer, decide by common agreement that a taxpayer other than the taxpayer designated by the group shall be the principal taxpayer.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 390 #

2011/0058(CNS)


Article 122 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The principal tax authority may initiate and coordinate audits of group members. They shall be coordinated by the European tax authority. An audit may also be initiated on the request of a competent authority or the European tax authority.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 391 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 122 – paragraph 3
3. The principalEuropean tax authority shall compile the results of all audits.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 393 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 123 – paragraph 1
1. Where the competent authority of the Member State in which a group member is resident or established disagrees with a decision of the principal tax authority made pursuant to Articles 107 or Article 114 paragraphs (3), (5) or (6) second subparagraph, it may challenge that decision before the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority within a period of three monthsin the first instance before the European tax authority and thereafter before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 394 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 123 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall have at least the same procedural rights as a taxpayer enjoys under the law of that Member State in proceedings against a decision of the principal tax authority.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 398 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 124 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) a decision rejecting a notice to opt;
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 403 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 127 – paragraph 2
2. As soon as the Commission adopts a delegated act, it shall notify it to the European Parliament and the Council.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 404 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 128 – paragraph 1
1. The delegation of powers referred to in Articles 2, 14, 34 and 42 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 405 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 129 – paragraph 1
1. The European Parliament and the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of three months from the date of notification.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 406 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 129 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
If, on the expiry of this period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has not objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 407 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 129 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council hasve informed the Commission of itstheir intention not to raise objections.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 408 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 130
Informing the European Parliament The European Parliament shall be informed of the adoption of delegated acts by the Commission of any objection formulated to them, or the revocation of the delegation of powers by the Council.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 414 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 133 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, fivthree years after the entry into force of this Directive, review its application and report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of this Directive. The report shall in particular include an analysis of the impact of the mechanism set up in Chapter XVI of this Directive on the distribution of the tax bases between the Member States and of the consolidation provisions.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises that demographic change is a prognosis relying on statistical probability and that, as the recent crisis has shown, it is not possible to establish enough criteria to predict future developments;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Emphasises that life expectancy is contingent on multiple factors, that working conditions and safety at work are decisive, and that, therefore, special account needs to be taken of forms of employment involving a high degree of psychic and physical stress;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Considers that, while birth rates are expected to decline, economic productivity is steadily increasing and is likely to offset future costs for pension schemes;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Observes that pension reforms are necessary in the context of demographic ageing and the financial and economic crisis, but notes at the same time that the first objective of a reform should be to ensure adequate retirement income for all;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 39 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Emphasises that, not only in times of economic crisis, private pension funds and occupational pensions are subject to market developments and, as a result, face the risk of losses owing to market fluctuations and possible insolvencies; notes, further, that there is no evidence that better regulation can eliminate these risks;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Points out that more and more atypical working arrangements and increasing levels of temporary employment are leading to extremely low wages, a state of affairs which simply excludes many employees from third-pillar pension schemes and makes them vulnerable to old-age poverty;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Points out that occupational pension schemes are almost exclusively offered in large enterprises and that employees in SMEs are mostly excluded from any such arrangement;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Points out that occupational pensions can often not be transferred to other enterprises and to other Member States;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1i. Points out that the unemployed are excluded from occupational pension schemes and cannot afford to invest in private pension funds, making them extremely vulnerable to old-age poverty;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 j (new)
1j. Points out that a shift from pay-as- you-go pension systems to contribution- based systems implies a shift of risk from the community to individual workers; notes that pay-as-you-go pension systems are safeguarded by the principle of 'solidarity between generations' and hence safer than private pension schemes;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 k (new)
1k. Notes that the impact of the economic crisis (increase in large-scale unemployment, dismissals of older employees and increasing prevalence of precarious working conditions) has undermined the sustainability of pension systems;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 l (new)
1l. Emphasises that, as part of the exchange of best practices under the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) in the employment sphere macro-economic differences between the Member States should be duly taken into account when dealing with micro-economic measures;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 m (new)
1m. Explicitly rejects the assumption that national budget constraints caused by the economic crisis justify the cutting of pension entitlements; emphasises that only increased revenue can offset losses to state budgets generated by the collapse of the capital markets;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 n (new)
1n. Emphasises that pension schemes should not only prevent old-age poverty, but generally guarantee the preservation of a decent standard of living;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 o (new)
1o. Calls on the Council to agree an EU target for minimum wages (statutory, collective agreements at national, regional or sectoral level) which provide for remuneration amounting to at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average wage in order to enable more employees to secure individual pension entitlements above the poverty threshold;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the EU has a strong role to play in developing a definition of an adequate decent retirement benefit, in the form of a set of goods and services that older people need to enjoy for a decn independent life;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that there is no perfect pension system, but is convinced that a balanced multi pillar system of public, work related and private as well as funded and unfunded should be found; is of the opinion that each Member State should define a minimum target income level after retirement of 60% of their respective national median equalised income so as to avoid raising poverty among ageing populationthe elderly;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that decent pension schemes should be a cornerstone of EU policy, as they can play a decisive role in achieving social progress and implementing the social market economy;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises that decent, safe pension schemes which prevent poverty are vital elements in the fight against social exclusion and discrimination and in the promotion of social justice and social protection, gender equality, and solidarity between generations;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the increase in retirement age needs to be correlated with life expectancy and working conditions;deleted
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 96 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that if the EU is to reach agreement on a set of rules or a code of conduct, the way to guarantee providers’ security will be through the general exclusion of high-risk products such as leverage products, hedge funds, private equity, naked short sales and credit default swaps not based on real transactions;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 149 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Invites the Council to agree on a guarantee for minimum pensions above the Union’s at-risk-of poverty threshold of 60% of national median equalised income, in order to prevent old-age poverty and to save elderly people from falling into means-tested minimum income schemes;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Ponts out that the shift from defined- benefit to defined-contribution systems fostered by the IAS/IFRS accounting standards, and in particular by IAS 19, runs counter to the aim of sustainable, reliable retirement pension provision; these accounting standards must therefore not be applied when calculating the solvency capital of IORPs and the scope of the Solvency II rules must not be extended to cover IORPs;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 152 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Deplores the fact that the Green Paper does not take into account the challenges of social exclusion and social inequality;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Deplores the fact that the Green Paper does not offer specific solutions for vulnerable groups, such as women, the long-term unemployed, young people, people with precarious employment contracts, migrants, ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, or people who take on responsibilities as carers;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls for consideration to be given to the scope for employing the proven German system of the Pension Guaranty Association, to which pension funds are also required to make contributions, in other Member States and, possibly, to taking over some of its criteria as the basis for European rules; the Association is an organisation set up by the employers themselves in order to improve safeguards against the insolvency of occupational retirement pension schemes;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 199 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Takes the view that workers should be provided with information about the costs, fees and risks linked to the conclusion of contracts for additional pension provision;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 215 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recommends the deletion of Article 5 (2) of Directive 2004/113/EC in order to rule out gender-related discrimination in access to pension schemes, and to promote gender-neutral payments;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Recommends the abandonment of lengthy contribution periods and minimum retirement ages in order to allow for the creation of decent pension entitlements for employees working part time, and for young employees from the first day of their working lives;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Rejects the automatic linkage of the statutory retirement age to life expectancy;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Member States to use the EU Year of Active Ageing, 2012, to engage in cooperation with the social partners and, with the support of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, to develop recommendations concerning the creation of high-quality jobs and the reduction of physical and mental stress for employees, thus enabling them to work until existing statutory retirement ages and making it unnecessary to raise those ages further;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Calls on the Member States to provide employers with information and to offer them advice with the aim of reducing prejudices concerning the employment of older persons (for example advice concerning health training, ergonomic changes to working routines, and working conditions that safeguard older employees' health and their ability to work);
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the EU to make the adequacy and sustainability of pension schemes a part of the 2020 strategy so as to ensure that the employment and growth strategy supports the EU's efforts to achieve its social cohesion goals;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 361 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that, because of the diversity and complexity of the various second-pillar systems, conditions need to be laid down concerning the portability of acquired pension entitlements in the sense that portability begins when new contracts are concluded, an application for transfer being approved only if the actuarial sum transferred is to be placed in a fund whose purpose is payment of old-age pensions; considers that tax must be calculated and paid in the Member State where the entitlements have been accumulatstresses that, first and foremost, the question of equal treatment in terms of the taxation of pension entitlements must be clarified;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 435 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Is concerned about the inadequate information provided to the public by public authorities and bodies administering pensions concerning the necessity, possibilities, accumulated entitlements, likely results and actual state of affairs with regard to old-age pensions; calls on the Commission and Member States to launch campaigns to enable and encourage members of the publiccitizens to take measures to ensure adequate pension provision for themselves; stresses that citizens have to be provided with information regarding actual costs and charges when concluding additional pension scheme contracts;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 459 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Recommends that the EU should develop a system of reporting for Member State national data that should also comprise medium-term and long-term developments and progress in the safeguarding of poverty-preventing, sustainable and adequate pension schemes; new indicators should give a differentiated picture of the social situation of people receiving old-age pensions and of the years before they retired (i.e. employees with a migrant background, employees from small enterprises, etc.);
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 463 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b (new)
35b. Stresses that, should consideration be given to enacting an EU regulation governing occupational and/or private pension scheme, pension schemes should not be allowed to make high-risk investments, such as in leveraged products, private equity, naked short selling, and credit default swaps (CDS), that are not based on real business transactions;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to ensure that vocational education and training are geared more closely to the ngoal of helping employeeds of the labour marketsecure the necessary qualifications to participate in working life and changing the employment system to make it fit for the future;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the aim of the Europe 2020 strategy whereby vocational education systems are to be oriented towards creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurial thinking and self-employment is to be viewed as a career optionstrengthened, and calls on the Member States to gear those systems towards broad-based qualifications, participation and the humanisation of work;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to allow for the growing need for upskilling by setting up advice centres to help workers plan the necessary vocational training; calls on employers to offer opportunities for upskilling and asks the Member States to lay down a binding framework for this purpose;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to devise a lifelong learning checklist to encourageinstruments to encourage and provide effective support for workers to systematically pursue lifelong learning on their own initiative and regularly review what skills they need to continue to operate successfully on the labour market;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Maintains that vocational secondary and post-secondary education institutions should also become involved in the training sphere, a point which applies particularly to post-secondary institutions offering courses to upgrade specialist skills, especially for MINT professions (mathematics, informatics, natural sciences, and technology); points out, however, that competition with private providers must not be distorted;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the Commission proposal to organise education and training offerings in modular form; calls, however, for the integral nature of a broad vocational qualification to be preserved as an absolute priority and for the individual modules to be clearly defined and provision made for the necessary means of comparison;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4 a. Points out that according to the Eurostat at-risk-of poverty indicator, in 2008 nearly 85 million persons in the European Union were at-risk-of poverty , and that according to the indicator ‘material deprivation’ it is estimated that the respective figure would rise to 120 million persons; considers that from the Council's decision on poverty-indicators there may arise ambiguities concerning the overall reduction target of lifting 20 million persons out of poverty and exclusion by 2020 (reduction of 23.5 % according to Eurostat at-risk-of poverty indicator, but only 16.7 % according to ‘material deprivation’);
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5
5. Points out that, according to the European Parliament's study 'Social protection as an Economic Stabilizer', social protection and social policy make important contributions to lessening the depth and duration of the recession by stabilising labour markets and consumption, and that the social protection system is a stabiliser on both the revenue and the expenditure side., and that evidence indicates that social spending may have a larger stabilising effect than the average of total government expenditure;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
5 a. Points out that, since equal and full participation in economical, political and social life should be realised as an individual right, active social inclusion policies should use a holistic approach to eradicate poverty and social exclusion, especially by ensuring full access to quality social services and services of general (economic) interest for all;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
5 b. Points out that only decent employment based on the International Labour Organisation's decent work principles and the principle of 'good work', including gender mainstreaming, together with the principle of equal pay for equal work in the same workplace can help to lift people out of poverty and social exclusion, and thereby contribute to broad political and cultural participation in the European society;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new)
5 c. Remembers that the 'European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion 2010' was supposed to be not only a media campaign, but to further stimulate multidimensional policies against poverty and more advanced poverty indicators; therefore asks the Commission to give a critical overview about new measures undertaken by Member States to overcome poverty and social exclusion in this context;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 d (new)
5 d. Invites the Commission and the Council to take due account of Parliaments demands raised in its resolutions of 15 November 2007 on Social Reality Stocktaking[1], of 9 October 2008 on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, including child poverty, in the EU[2], of 6 May 2009 on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market[3] and of 19 October 2010 on the role of minimum income in combating poverty and promoting an participative society in Europe when designing policies and measures for the next stage of the OMC on Social Inclusion and Social Protection, the Social Inclusion Strategy and the ‘Europe 2020’ flagship initiative on combating poverty and social exclusion, involving all stakeholders in a participatory process; ([1] Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0541. [2] Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0467. [3] Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0371.)
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 e (new)
5 e. Calls on the Commission to closely examine obstacles for social participation such as energy poverty, financial exclusion and obstacles in access to information and communication technology (ICT);
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 f (new)
5 f. Demands that measures to establish a greener and climate friendly economy should go hand in hand with all efforts to eradicate poverty; therefore expresses it's concern that in some Member States the costs for energy efficiency of housing shall be passed on to the tenants;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 g (new)
5 g. Remembers that the fight against poverty and social exclusion is to be pursued both within the European Union and externally, in order to fulfil the European Union's and the Member State's commitment to reach the UN Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal forthwith stipulating that firms that are making workers redundant and which recorded profits in past reporting periods must contribute in an appropriate manner to meeting the social costs arising out of plant relocations and job cuts and securing the refinancing of the EGF;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Calls on the Commission to replace the EGF in the medium term with a restructuring fund, financed by means of an EU-wide plant relocation levy and offering support to enterprises in proportion to the level of lasting replacement jobs created by them;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Calls on the Commission to introduce criteria by means of which the granting of EGF assistance can be linked as a matter of priority to restructuring measures designed to secure and create employment and ecologically sustainable and socially balanced development in the regions concerned;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Calls on the Commission to broaden the criteria for the mobilisation of the EGF, in keeping with the above- mentioned conditions, to cover delocalisation within the European Union and to simplify the application procedure significantly;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Requests the Commission to psublish its data on the efficiency of use of the EGF in the interest of sound EU budgetary management, so as to allow Parliament to conduct an ex post controlmit forthwith a report on the use made to date of the Globalisation Adjustment Fund, setting out in particular a detailed account of how the appropriations were used and what proportion of overall funding they accounted for by comparison with other national and company-specific support measures; calls on the Commission to draw initial conclusions from that report and rapidly submit proposals for the improvement of the fund.
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to increase significantly the financial framework for the EGF, in the light of the current economic and financial crisis and the Fund’s broader remit, and to create a separate title in the budget for the EGF.
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) adopted in 1979,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
– having regard to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, reconfirmed during the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights, in particular Articles 3, 16, 18, 23, 25, 26, 27 and 29,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
– having regard to International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions Nos 26 and 131 on minimum wage fixing and No 29 and 105 on the abolishment of forced labour,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the ILO report "A global alliance against forced labour. Global report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Report of the Director-General, 2005",
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
– having regard to Articles 34, 35 and 36 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which specifically define the right to social and housing assistance, a high level of human health protection and access to services of general economic interest1, 1 (OJ C 303, 14.12.2007, p. 1.)
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A6-0364/2008),
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas poverty and social exclusion are violations of human dignity and fundamental human rights, and the central objective of income support schemes must be to lift people out of poverty and enable them to live in dignity,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the risk of falling into extreme poverty is greater for women than for men; whereas the persistent trend towards feminisation of poverty in European societies today demonstrates that the current framework of social protection systems and the wide range of social, economic and employment policies in the Union are not designed to meet women's needs or to address the differences in women's work; whereas poverty among women and their social exclusion in Europe requires specific, multiple and gender-specific policy responses,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the risk of falling into extreme poverty is greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, because social security systems are often based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment; whereas an individualised right to a poverty preventing minimum income should not be conditional on employment related contributions,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas account should be taken of the multidimensional nature of poverty and social exclusion, the existence of particularly vulnerable population groups (children, women and elderly people), which also include people with disabilities, immigrants, large or single-parent families, the chronically ill and the homeless, as well as the need to incorporate action to prevent and combat poverty and exclusion in other policies, with a guarantee of universal access to public services, high- quality jobs with rights and aninfrastructure and services of general interest, high- quality jobs with rights and a poverty preventing guaranteed minimum income allowenabling people to live withsocial, cultural and political participation and a life in dignity,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas the role of social protection systems is to ensure the level of social cohesion needed for development guaranteeing social inclusion, which also implies a poverty preventing individually guaranteed minimum income, improving the level of education training of those people excluded from the labour market and guaranteeing equal opportunities in the exercise of fundamental rights,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need for concrete measures to effectively and significantly reducradicate poverty and social exclusion, ensuring a fair redistribution of income and wealth and also, thereby giving meaning and content to the European Year for Combating Poverty and to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, including guaranteeing an adequatepoverty preventing and socially including minimum income schemes throughout the European Union;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the promotion of social integration and inclusion, in order to guarantee protection of fundamental human rights, and clear commitments to draw up EU and national policies to combat poverty and social exclusion, by ensuring universal access to public health services, education, vocational education and training, housing and energy provision, and social protection, in addition to employment with rights, fairand wages, decent pensions and an adequate income for everyoneminimum income schemes for everyone that guarantees freedom from poverty and ensures social, cultural and political inclusion;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the European Commission, in its "Europe 2020" strategy document, announces that removing the risk of poverty for 20 million people is one of the EU's five headline targets; believereminds that this target should be at least doubled and made more credible with appropriatefalls behind the initial ambitions of the Lisbon Strategy (overcome poverty), believes that poverty and social exclusion must be eradicated by credible, concrete and binding measures;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Council and the EU Member States to base the "Europe 2020" headline target to tackle poverty on the relative poverty indicator (60% of the median income threshold), as endorsed by the Laeken European Council in December 2001, because this indicator sets the reality of poverty within the context of each member state, as it reflects an understanding of poverty as a relative condition;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls, in respect of the poverty reduction target, its earlier proposals for the following targets: - The need to set up an EU target for minimum income schemes and contributory replacement income schemes providing income support of at least 60% of national median equalised income, and agreement on a timetable for achieving this target in all Member States; - The need to set up an EU target for minimum wages (statutory, collective agreements at national, regional or sectoral level) to provide for remuneration of at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average wage, and agreement on a timetable for achieving that target in all Member States; - The need for the EU to agree on an EU- wide target to end street homelessness by 2015 and for all Member States to develop integrated homelessness strategies with a view to ending homelessness;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for further real progress on the adequacy of Minimum Income Schemes, so as to be capable of lifting every child, adult and older person out of poverty and delivering on their right to a dignified life; calls on the Council to reach agreement on a common EU definition of adequacy and of common methods to establish adequacy, which should inform an EU Framework Directive on Minimum Income to achieve higher level social standards;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Considers that an explicit commitment must be made by Member States to implement Active Inclusion: reducing conditionality, investing in supportive activation, defending adequate minimum income and preserving social standards by outlawing cuts to key public services so that the poor will not pay for the crisis;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the various experiments with minimum incomes, accompanied by additional social integration measures, show that this is a further essential way of combating poverty and social exclusion; therefore calls on the European Commission to prepare an initiative supporting these experiments, taking into account best practices and ensuring an adequateindividually guaranteed poverty preventing minimum income schemes throughout the European Union as a means to preventeradicate poverty and guarantee social justice and equal opportunities for all, without calling into question the specific situations in each Member State;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the urgent need to define and use appropriate economic and social indicators in various areas (health, housing, energy provision, social and cultural inclusion, mobility, education, income and employment), which will allow the progress made in combating poverty and promoting social inclusion to be monitored and measured; states that these indicators should be presented annually on International Day for the Eradication of Poverty (17 October), should evolve as necessary and should include gender, age ranges, households, disability situations, immigration, chronic illness and various income levels (60% of median income; 50% of median income; 40% of median income) in order to take account of relative poverty, extreme poverty and the most vulnerable groups;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Urges those people in a state ofCalls for an integration of people experiencing poverty and their representative organisations to participateand networks in the preparation and, application and monitoring of policies, measures and indicators at European, national, regional and local levels;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Deeply regrets that some Member States appear not to have regard to Council Recommendation 92/441/EEC, which recognises the 'basic right of a person to sufficient resources and social assistance to live in a manner compatible with human dignity';
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that minimum income schemes must cover fuel costs to allow poor households affected by energy poverty to pay their energy bills; minimum income schemes must be calculated on the basis of realistic assessments of how much it costs to heat a home related to the specific household needs – e.g. family with children, older people and disabled persons.
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2010/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Points out that most Member States in EU-27 have national minimum income schemes, but several do not; encourages the Member States to provide for poverty preventing guaranteed minimum income schemes for social inclusion, and urges them to exchange best practice; recognises that, where there is provision of social assistance, Member States have a duty to ensure that citizens understand and are able to obtain their entitlements.
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that, given demographic trends, there is great potential for developing sustainable jobs in the area of social and healthcare services, which should be tapped in the interests of an effective employment policy;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Takes the view that employment policy plays a central role in combating poverty and social exclusion, and consequently calls, in line with the ILO ‘Decent Work’ programme, for qualitatively good working conditions and remuneration that not only provides a decent living, but also guarantees an appropriate share of GDP;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2010/2010(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas new sectors asocial dialogue structures often do not integrated in social dialogue structureexist, or do not yet exist, in new sectors; whereas no collective agreements ordo not exist, or existing ones are not applied, and sector-specific codes existdo not exist either; whereas the new sectors are subject to great pressure to produce and compete; whereas, in regions with high unemployment, the pressure to accept bad working conditions is high,
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2010/2010(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the EU and Member States to link public aid for new production sectors to minimum social standards, as well as public procurement, to minimum social standards – particularly the requirement for, and compliance with, collective agreements – and the creation of representative bodies, such as works councils and trade associations, in future;
2010/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2010/0383(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – point 2 – point a
a) in the courts for the place where or from where the employee habitually carriesd out his work or in the courts for the last place where he did sowas employed, or
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2010/0383(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – point 2 – point b a (new)
ba) If courts in various places can be involved, the employee shall choose one of these.
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2010/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Research and development expenditure, provided it is used to procure or manufacture economic goods, has the nature of investment and should therefore be recorded as fixed capital formation. However, it is necessary to specify the format of the data to be recorded as fixed capital formation by means of a delegated act when a sufficient level of confidence in the reliability of the data is reached through a test exercise based on the development of supplementary tables.
2012/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 38 #

2010/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Member States' arms expenditure is by nature not investment in the classical sense and should therefore not be recorded as fixed capital formation but should continue to be recorded as normal operating expenditure.
2012/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2010/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. Research and development expenditure, provided it is used to procure or manufacture economic goods, shall be recorded, by Member States, as fixed capital formation. The Commission may adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Articles 7, 8 and 9, to ensure the reliability of the data to be recorded as fixed capital formation. Such delegated acts shall specify the format of those data.
2012/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2010/0374(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States' arms expenditure shall be recorded as normal operating expenditure.
2012/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 39 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Communityon the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 31 and 32 153 thereof,
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 provides for the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires appropriate conditioning, containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including disposal in appropriate facilities as the end point of its management. The storage of radioactive waste, including long-term storage, is an interim solution but not an alternative to disposal.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) The typical dDisposal concepts for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposalvary from near surface disposal (in buildings, shallow burial or burial down to a few tens of metres below the surface) to state- of-the-art disposal in geologic repositories 70-100 m underground. Following 30 years of research, it is broadly accepted at the technical levelssumed by nuclear interests that deep geological disposal represents the safest and most sustainable option as the end point of the management of high level radioactive waste and spent fuel considered as waste. Thus. If the safety cases of the proposed methods for deep geological disposal can be assured, a movinge towards implementation of disposal shcould be pursuconsidered.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that policy should respect the relevant fundamental safety principles set by the IAEA. It is an ethical obligation of each Member State to avoid any undue burden on future generations in respect of the existing spent fuel and radioactive waste, as well as those expected from decommissioning of existing nuclear installations. Member States should therefore establish a decommissioning policy that guarantees that facilities are dismantled in the safest manner as early as possible after their closure.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) It is necessary for workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; it is necessary for the long term effects on the health and safety of workers to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 b (new)
(34b) When this Directive is implemented, it is necessary that particular attention be given to workers at risk and that non- compliance with health and safety legislation be followed by immediate and effective sanctions.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 c (new)
(34c) Since, in many instances, the health consequences for workers of exposure to radioactivity do not emerge for years or decades, all documentation drawn up on the workers concerned in connection with the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste should be kept.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) Transparency is important in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. It should be provided by requiring effective public information, in Member States' customary official publications, and opportunities for all concerned stakeholders to participate in the decision- making processes.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39 a (new)
(39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) Maintaining and further developing competences and skills in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as an essential element to ensure high levels of safety and to protect workers, should be based on a combination of learning through preventive training, operational experience, scientific research and technological development, and technical cooperation between all actors.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
(2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for athe highest level of safety in spent fuel and radioactive waste management to protect workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1 – subpoint b
(b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to disposal, when the radioactive waste results from civilian activities or is managed within civilian activitiesand including disposal;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2
(2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall notalso be subject to this Directive.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 3
(3) This Directive shall not apply to authorised releases.deleted
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) 'radioactive waste' means spent fuels, radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form for which no further use is foreseen bthat originates from reprocessing and any othe Member State or by a natural or legal person whose decision is accepted by the Member State, andr radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form which is controlled as radioactive waste by a competent regulatory authority under the legislative and regulatory framework of the Member State;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) 'spent fuel' means nuclear fuel that has been irradiated in and permanently removed from a reactor core; spent fuel may either be considered as a usable resource that can be reprocessed or be destined for final disposal if regarded as radioactive wasreprocessed or is considered as radioactive waste if no further use is envisaged for it for the following two years by the Member State or by a licence holder whose decision is accepted by the Member State;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d
(d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed, including in the long term. during a minimum of 250 years or even longer so long as they are hazardous to people and the environment;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d a (new)
(da) exposure of workers and the public to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d b (new)
(db) measures are taken to cover the future health risks for exposed workers, including those not documented;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d c (new)
(dc) measures are taken which cover all workers involved in the processes relating to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, including those workers indirectly involved, such as transport workers, security workers, members of the armed forces and police officers;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d d (new)
(dd) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – point 1 – subpoint e
(e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence, covering, inter alia, infringements of health and safety rules applicable to the workers concerned;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – point 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – point 3 b (new)
(3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority has the powers and resources needed to carry out regular nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls and, where necessary, enforcement actions in the facilities, even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including those employed by any subcontractors, as well as staffing levels and training shall form part of these assessments.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – point 3 c (new)
(3c) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority reports to the Member States and relevant competent organisations, licence holders, representatives of the employees of the licence holder, subcontractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – point 3 d (new)
(3d) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority establishes or specifies a body which is to be responsible for conserving records relating to workers involved in the handling of spent fuel and radioactive waste for at least 50 years and for compiling records independently of the employer or subcontractor, in keeping with applicable data protection rules, and which is required to release information to the workers concerned and their descendants.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – point 2
(2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities and- including the health and safety of workers and subcontractors and the safety of their facilities - in a systematic and verifiable manner. Licence holders shall report to the competent regulatory authority and other relevant competent organisations, representatives of their employees, subcontractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – point 3
(3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder’s administrative procedures for protection that would have to fail before workers and the general public would be significantly affected by ionizing radiation.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – point 4
(4) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to establish and implement management systems which give due priority to safety and security and are regularly verified by the competent regulatory authority and workers’ representatives.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – point 5
(5) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to provide for and maintain adequate financial and human resources to fulfil their obligations with respect to the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management, laid down in paragraphs 1 to 4, including for the long term over 250 years or more.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – point 2
(2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or closure of a disposal facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall include an assessment of the health and safety risks for workers, including those employed by subcontractors, and of the skill levels and number of staff required for the safe operation of the facility at all times, so that action can be taken in the event of an accident.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – point 4
(4) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall be submitted to the competent regulatory authority for approval. Representatives of the workers concerned shall be informed and consulted before the safety assessments are submitted to the competent regulatory authority.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – point 4 a (new)
(4a) The safety case shall cover not only the site but also any related issues, such as the transport of radioactive waste or spent fuel to or from the site.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9
Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and skills. Member States shall pay special attention to parties indirectly involved and ensure that they are offered state-of-the- art, appropriate education and training before the operations involving radioactive waste and spent fuel are carried out.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10
Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers, health and safety matters and occupational diseases which might occur following long-term exposure to radioactive emissions.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11
Member States shall ensure that appropriate quality assurance programmes, including education and training, concerning the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management are established and regularly implemented.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – point 1
(1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the public (in particular concerning radioactive and toxic emissions and exposure to emissions) must be made public, irrespective of the circumstances.
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to disposal, with top priority being given to historic radioactive waste and spent fuel in intermediate storage pools;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2010/0306(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) assessment of programme costs and the underlying basis and hypotheses for this assessment, which must include a profile over timedetailed plans on the number of inspections, the resources for inspection and the training of inspection bodies;
2011/02/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘imbalances’ means macroeconomic developments persistently diverging developments between aggregate demand and aggregate supply leading to a systematic surplus or deficit in the overall savings position of an economy, which areis adversely affecting, or haves the potential to adversely to affect, the proper functioning of the economy of a Member State or of economic and monetary union, or of the Union as a whole.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The scoreboard shall be made up of an array of macroeconomic and, macrofinancial and social indicators for Member States. The Commission may set indicative lower or upper thresholds for these indicators to serve as alert levels. The thresholds applicable to Member States whose currency is the euro may be different from those applicable to the other Member Stse will allow to detect serious misalignments between aggregate demand and supply and between an economy’s income and consumption. Social indicators will, amongst others, include indicators on inequalities, the incidence of low pay, the working poor, the share of labour income in overall GDP and unit profit rates.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the European social partners may adopt recommendations in accordance with Article 121(4) of the Treaty declaring the existence of an excessive imbalance and recommending the Member State concerned to take corrective action. Those recommendations shall set out the nature of the imbalances and specify the corrective action to be taken in detail and the deadline within which the Member State concerned must take such corrective action. The Council may, as provided for in Article 121(4) of the Treaty, make its recommendations public.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The recommendations referred to in paragraph 2 shall comply with the objectives of the Union as defined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. The recommendations shall take due account of Article 153 TFEU, as well as of the rights incorporated in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The recommendations shall also strictly respect the specificity of each Member State, in particular its model of industrial relations and social dialogue. Due attention shall be paid to the symmetry of recommendations, addressing excessive savings in a similarly intense way as situations in which economies are excessively indebting themselves.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2010/0281(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
1 Rejects the Commissions proposal.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 180 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'imbalances' means macroeconomic developments persistently diverging developments between aggregate demand and aggregate supply leading to a systematic surplus or deficit in the overall savings position of an economy, which areis adversely affecting, or haves the potential to adversely to affect, the proper functioning of the economy of a Member State or of economic and monetary union, or of the Union as a whole.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 189 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 'excessive imbalances‘ means severe imbalances, including imbalances that jeopardise the proper functioning of economic, social and monetary union.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 208 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The scoreboard shall be made up of an array of macroeconomic and, macrofinancial and social indicators for Member Sstates. The Commission may set indicative lower or upper thresholds for these indicators to serve as alert levels. The thresholds applicable to Member States whose currency is the euro may be different from those applicable to the other Member Stse will allow to detect serious misalignments between aggregate demand and supply and between an economy’s income and consumption. Social indicators will, amongst others, include indicators on inequalities, the incidence of low pay, the working poor, the share of labour income in overall GDP and unit profit rates.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 312 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. If, on the basis of the in-depth review referred to in Article 5, the Commission considers that the Member State concerned is affected by excessive imbalances, it shall inform the Council and the European Parliament accordingly.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 320 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament and the European social partners may adopt recommendations in accordance with Article 121(4) of the Treaty declaring the existence of an excessive imbalance and recommending the Member State concerned to take corrective action. Those recommendations shall set out the nature of the imbalances and specify the corrective action to be taken in detail and the deadline within which the Member State concerned must take such corrective action. The Council may, as provided for in Article 121(4) of the Treaty, make its recommendations public.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 325 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The recommendations referred to in paragraph 2 shall comply with the objectives of the Union as defined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. The recommendations shall take due account of Article 153 TFEU, as well as of the rights incorporated in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The recommendations shall also strictly respect the specificity of each Member State, in particular its model of industrial relations and social dialogue. Due attention shall be paid to the symmetry of recommendations, addressing excessive savings in a similarly intense way as situations in which economies are excessively indebting themselves.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
-
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 9
(9) PrudentSound fiscal policy- making implies that the growth rate of government expenditure does normally not exceed a prudentpublic finances; over the medium term, adhere to a set of expenditure and revenue indicative guidelines. Growth in tax revenue (with temporary sources of revenue being excluded) should normally not fall behind the medium- term growth rate o f GDP, increases in excess of that norm are matched by d. Growth in government expenditure (with those social benefits and expenditure components being related to the business cycle) should normally not exceed a prudent medium term growth rate of GDP. Discretionary increases in government revenues andexpenditure or discretionary revenue reductions are compensated by reductions in expenditurein tax revenue are to be offset by accompanying other discretionary measures, either on the side of expenditure or/and on the side of tax revenues.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 10
(10) A temporary departure from prudentsound fiscal policy-making should be allowed in case of a severe economic downturn of a general nature, including the period in which the economy is operating below its normal potential, in order to facilitate a full economic recovery.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
With a view to ensuring that the medium- term budgetary objective is effectively achieved and maintained, the Council shall verify that the growth path of government expenditure, taken in conjunction with the and the growth path of tax revenue, taking into account the possible compensating effects of measures being taken or planned on the revenue side, isoffsetting discretionary measures, are consistent with prudentsound fiscal policy-making.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
(a) for Member States that have achieved the medium-term budgetary objective, annual expenditure growth does not exceed a prudentthe estimate of medium-term rate of GDP growth, whereas growth in tax revenue does not stay behind the growth in government revenue unless the excess ises or gaps are matched by discretionary revenue measmeasures in revenue or/and expenditures;
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b
(b) for Member States that have not yet reached their medium-term budgetary objective , annual growth in tax revenue should exceed the medium term rate of growth of GDP, whereas annual medium term expenditure growth doesshould not exceed a rate below a prudent medium- term rate of GDP growth, unless the excess is matched by discretionary revenue measures. The impact of unemployment benefits and other social expenditure related to the business cycle is not to be taken into account when in the calculation and assessment of the growth path of government expenditure. Deviations from these indicative expenditure and growth paths shall not be seen as a problem in case these deviations are matched by discretionary measures, either on the expenditure side or the revenue side or both. The size of the shortfall of the growth rate of government expenditure compared to a prudent medium-term rate of GDP growth is, and the size of the excess of growth rate of tax revenue compared to medium term GDP growth are both set in such a way as to ensure an appropriate adjustment towards the medium-term budgetary objective;
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 6
When defining the adjustment path to the medium-term budgetary objective for Member States that have not yet reached this objective and in allowing a temporary deviation from this objective for Member States that have already reached it, under the condition that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved and that the budgetary position is expected to return to the medium-term budgetary objective within the programme period, the Council shall take into account the implementation of major structural reforms which have direct long-term cost-saving effects, including by raising potential growth, and therefore a verifiable impact on the long-term sustainability of public financesare conducive to the achievement of the Union’s objectives of growth, jobs and social and regional cohesion.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
Special attention shall be paid to pensionthose reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillarthat maintain existing jobs and create new and better jobs as well as reforms based on public investments. Member States implementing such reforms shall be allowed to deviate from the adjustment path to their medium-term budgetary objective or from the objective itself, with the deviation reflecting the net cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar, under the condition that the deviation remains temporary and that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 9
In periods of severe economic downturn of a general nature, including its aftermath and the period in which the economy is still operating below potential Member States mayshall be allowed to temporarily depart from the adjustment path implied by prudent fiscal- policy making referred to in the fourth subparagraph.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
Special attention shall be paid to pension reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fullypublic and pay-as- you-go funded pillar. Member States implementing such reforms shall be allowed to deviate from the adjustment path to their medium-term budgetary objective or from the objective itself, with the deviation reflecting the net cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar, under the condition that the deviation remains temporary and that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) PrudentSound fiscal policy- making implies that the growth rate of government expenditure does normally not exceed a prudentpublic finances; over the medium term, adhere to a set of expenditure and revenue indicative guidelines. Growth in tax revenue (with temporary sources of revenue being excluded) should normally not fall behind the medium- term growth rate o f GDP, increases in excess of that norm are matched by d. Growth in government expenditure (with those social benefits and expenditure components being related to the business cycle) should normally not exceed a prudent medium term growth rate of GDP. Discretionary increases in government revenues andexpenditure or discretionary revenue reductions are compensated by reductions in expenditurein tax revenue are to be offset by accompanying other discretionary measures, either on the side of expenditure or/and on the side of tax revenues.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 169 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) A temporary departure from prudentsound fiscal policy-making should be allowed in case of a severe economic downturn of a general nature, including the period in which the economy is operating below its normal potential, in order to facilitate a full economic recovery.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 291 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
With a view to ensuring that the medium- term budgetary objective is effectively achieved and maintained, the Council shall verify that the growth path of government expenditure, taken in conjunction with the and the growth path of tax revenue, taking into account the possible compensating effects of measures being taken or planned on the revenue side, isoffsetting discretionary measures, are consistent with prudentsound fiscal policy-making.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 300 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
(a) for Member States that have achieved the medium-term budgetary objective, annual expenditure growth does not exceed a prudentthe estimate of medium-term rate of GDP growth, whereas growth in tax revenue does not stay behind the growth in government revenue unless the excess ises or gaps are matched by discretionary revenue measmeasures in revenue or/and expenditures;
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 308 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point b
(b) for Member States that have not yet reached their medium-term budgetary objective, annual growth in tax revenue should exceed the medium term rate of growth of GDP, whereas annual medium term expenditure growth doesshould not exceed a rate below a prudent medium- term rate of GDP growth, unless the excess is matched by discretionary revenue measures. The impact of unemployment benefits and other social expenditure related to the business cycle is not to be taken into account when in the calculation and assessment of the growth path of government expenditure. Deviations from these indicative expenditure and growth paths shall not be seen as a problem in case these deviations are matched by discretionary measures, either on the expenditure side or the revenue side or both. The size of the shortfall of the growth rate of government expenditure compared to a prudent medium-term rate of GDP growth is, and the size of the excess of growth rate of tax revenue compared to medium term GDP growth are both set in such a way as to ensure an appropriate adjustment towards the medium-term budgetary objective;
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 330 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 6
When defining the adjustment path to the medium-term budgetary objective for Member States that have not yet reached this objective and in allowing a temporary deviation from this objective for Member States that have already reached it, under the condition that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved and that the budgetary position is expected to return to the medium-term budgetary objective within the programme period, the Council shall take into account the implementation of major structural reforms which have direct long-term cost-saving effects, including by raising potential growth, and therefore a verifiable impact on the long-term sustainability of public financesare conducive to the achievement of the Union’s objectives of growth, jobs and social and regional cohesion.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 339 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
Special attention shall be paid to pensionthose reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillarthat maintain existing jobs and create new and better jobs as well as reforms based on public investments. Member States implementing such reforms shall be allowed to deviate from the adjustment path to their medium-term budgetary objective or from the objective itself, with the deviation reflecting the net cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar, under the condition that the deviation remains temporary and that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 355 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 9
In periods of severe economic downturn of a general nature, including its aftermath and the period in which the economy is still operating below potential Member States mayshall be allowed to temporarily depart from the adjustment path implied by prudent fiscal- policy making referred to in the fourth subparagraph.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 503 #

2010/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 1466/97
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7
Special attention shall be paid to pension reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fullypublic and pay-as- you-go funded pillar. Member States implementing such reforms shall be allowed to deviate from the adjustment path to their medium-term budgetary objective or from the objective itself, with the deviation reflecting the net cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar, under the condition that the deviation remains temporary and that an appropriate safety margin with respect to the deficit reference value is preserved.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
11. The procedure for the application of the fines on the Member States which fail to take effective measures to correct macroeconomic imbalances should be construed in such a way that the application of the fine on those Member States would be the rule and not the exceptfair, efficient and respect the fundamental objectives and the democratic values of the European Union.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
12. The collected fines should be distributed between Member States whose currency is the euro which are neithhave an excessive deficit in order theo subject of an excessive imbalance procedure nor havepport their adjustment process by providing finance strictly linked to social and excessive deficinvironmental sustainable investment.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to Member States whose currency is the euro. In respect of Article 153 of the Treaty, sanctions foreseen in this regulation will not relate to the issue of pay and related labour market institutions, in particular minimum wage systems and collective bargaining structures. In order to share the burden of adjustment between ‘deficit’ and ‘surplus’ countries, this regulation will be implemented only with regard to Member States with an excessive surplus.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The decision shall be deemed adopted by the Council unless it decides,acting by qualified majority, to reject the proposal within ten days the Commission adopting it. The Council may amend the proposal in accordance with Article 293(1) of the Treaty.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
Fines collected in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation shall constitute other revenue, as referred to in Article 311 of the Treaty, and shall be distributed, in proportion to their share in the total gross national income (GNI) of the eligible Member States, between Member States whose currency is the euro and which are not the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No […/…] and do not have an excessive deficit as determdo have an excessive deficit as determined in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, in order to support their adjustment process by providing finance strictly linked in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treatyto social and environmental sustainable investment.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The procedure for the application of the fines on the Member States which fail to take effective measures to correct macroeconomic imbalances should be construed in such a way that the application of the fine on those Member States would be the rule and not the exceptfair, efficient and respect the fundamental objectives and the democratic values of the European Union.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 139 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The collected fines should be distributed between Member States whose currency is the euro which are neithhave an excessive deficit in order theo subject of an excessive imbalance procedure nor havepport their adjustment process by providing finance strictly linked to social and excessive deficinvironmental sustainable investment.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 158 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to Member States whose currency is the euro. In respect of Article 153 of the Treaty, sanctions foreseen in this regulation will not relate to the issue of pay and related labour market institutions, in particular minimum wage systems and collective bargaining structures. In order to share the burden of adjustment between ‘deficit’ and ‘surplus’ countries, this regulation will be implemented only with regard to Member States with an excessive surplus.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 191 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The decision shall be deemed adopted by the Council unless itby decides,ing by qualified majority, to reject the proposal within ten days the Commission adopting it. The Council may amend the proposal in accordance with Article 293(1) of the Treaty.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 237 #

2010/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
Fines collected in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation shall constitute other revenue, as referred to in Article 311 of the Treaty, and shall be distributed, in proportion to their share in the total gross national income (GNI) of the eligible Member States, between Member States whose currency is the euro and which are not the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No […/…] and do not have an excessive deficit as determdo have an excessive deficit as determined in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, in order to support their adjustment process by providing finance strictly linked in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treatyto social and environmental sustainable investment.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2010/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. If the Council decides in accordance with Article 126(8) of the Treaty that the Member State has not taken effective action in response to a Council recommendation within the period laid down, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, shall decide that the Member State shall pay a fine. The decision shall be deemed adopted by the Council unless it decides by qualified majority to reject the proposal within ten days of the Commission adopting In respect of Article 153 of the Treaty, no fine will be levied if the fine is related to a recommendation concerning the issue of pay and/or collective bargaining in the public sector. The decision shall be adopted by the Council acting by qualified majority. The Council may amend the proposal in accordance with Article 293(1) of the Treaty.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
-
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 59 #

2010/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Member States whose currency is the euro have a particular interest and responsibility to conduct economic policies that promote the proper functioning of economic, social and monetary union and to avoid policies that jeopardise it.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 268 #

2010/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. If the Council decides in accordance with Article 126(8) of the Treaty that the Member State has not taken effective action in response to a Council recommendation within the period laid down, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, shall decide that the Member State shall pay a fine. The decision shall be deemed adopted by the Council unless it decides by qualified majority to reject the proposal within ten days of the Commission adopting In respect of article 153 of the Treaty, no fine will be levied if the fine is related to a recommendation concerning the issue of pay and/or collective bargaining in the public sector. The decision shall be adopted by the Council by deciding by qualified majority. The Council may amend the proposal in accordance with Article 293(1) of the Treaty.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2010/0277(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/0277(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;deleted
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2010/0277(NLE)

Proposal for a directive
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 8
(8) In the establishment of the existence of an excessive deficit based on the deficit criterion and the steps leading to it there is a need to take into account the whole range of relevant factors covered by the report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty if the government debt to gross domestic product does not exceed the reference value.deleted
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 11
(11) The assessment of effective action will benefit from taking compliance with general government expenditure and tax revenue targets as a reference in conjunction with the implementation of planned specific revenue measures.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 1a
1a. When it exceeds the reference value, and provided the economy has been operating over the past three years above its potential, the ratio of the government debt to gross domestic product (GDP) is to be considered sufficiently diminishing and approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace in accordance with Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty if the differential with respect to the reference value has reduced over the previous three years at a rate of the order of one-twentieth per year. For a period of 3 years from [date of entering into force of this Regulation - to be inserted], account shall be taken of the backward-looking nature of this indicator in its application.'
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, when preparing a report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty shall take into account all relevant factors as indicated in that Article. The report shall appropriately reflect developments in the medium-term economic position (in particular potential growth, prevailing cyclical conditions, inflation, excessive macroeconomic imbalances, the private sector net savings position) and developments in the medium-term budgetary position (in particular, fiscal consolidation efforts in “good times”, public investment, the implementation of policies in the context of the common growth strategy for the Union and the overall quality of public finances, in particular, compliance with Council Directive […] on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States). The report shall also analyse developments in the medium-term debt position as relevant (in particular, it appropriately reflects risk factors including the maturity structure and currency denomination of the debt, stock-flow operations, accumulated reserves and other government assets; guarantees, notably linked to the financial sector; liabilities both explicit and implicit related to ageing and private debt to the extent that it may represent a contingent implicit liability for the government). Furthermore, the Commission shall give due consideration to any other factors which, in the opinion of the Member State concerned, are relevant in order to comprehensively assess in qualitative terms the excess over the reference value and which the Member State has put forward to the Commission and to the Council. In that context, special consideration shall be given to financial contributions to fostering international solidarity and to achieving Union policy goals, including financial stability, social and regional cohesion.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 4
(d) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: ‘4. The Commission and the Council shall make a balanced overall assessment of all the relevant factors, specifically, the extent to which they affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and/or the debt criteria as aggravating or mitigating factors. When assessing compliance on the basis of the deficit criterion, if the ratio of the government debt to GDP exceeds the reference value, these factors shall be taken into account in the steps leading to the decision on the existence of an excessive deficit provided for in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of Article 126 of the Treaty only if the double condition of the overarching principle that, before these relevant factors are taken into account, the general government deficit remains close to the reference value and its excess over the reference value is temporary is fully met.’deleted
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint d a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 5
(da) paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: "5. The Commission and the Council, in all budgetary assessments in the framework of the excessive deficit procedure, shall give due consideration to the implementation of structural reforms which are conducive to the achievement of the Union’s objectives on sustainable economic, social and environmentally responsible growth."
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. In the case of Member States where the excess of the deficit or the breach of the requirements of the debt criterion according to Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty reflects the implementation of a pension reform introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillarthose reforms that maintain existing jobs and create new and better jobs as well as reforms based on public investments, the Commission and the Council shall also consider the cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar when assessing developments in EDP deficit and debt figures. In cases where the debt ratio exceeds the reference value, the cost of the reform shall be considered only if the deficit remains close to the reference value. For that purpose, for a period of five years starting from the date of entry into force of such a reform, consideration shall be given to its net cost as reflected in deficit and debt developments on the basis of a linear degressive scale. Additionally, irrespective of the date of entry into force of the reform, its net cost as reflected in debt developments shall be given consideration for a transitional period of five years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation, to be inserted] on the basis of the same linear degressive scale. The net cost as thus calculated shall be taken into account also for the decision of the Council under Article 126(12) of the Treaty on the abrogation of some or all of its decisions under paragraphs 6 to 9 and 11 of Article 126 of the Treaty, if the deficit has declined substantially and continuously and has reached a level that comes close to the reference value and, in case of non- fulfilment of the requirements of the debt criterion, the debt has been put on a declining path. Moreover, equal consideration shall be given to the reduction in this net cost resulting from the partial or total reversal of an above mentioned pension reform.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 16
Fines referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation shall constitute other revenue referred to in Article 311 of the Treaty and shall be distributed among participating Member States which do not have excessivhave a economic trade deficit as determined in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty and which are not the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No […/…], in proportion to their share in the total gross national income (GNI) of the eligible Member State, strictly linked to sustainable economic, social and environmental investments.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 8
(8) In the establishment of the existence of an excessive deficit based on the deficit criterion and the steps leading to it there is a need to take into account the whole range of relevant factors covered by the report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty if the government debt to gross domestic product does not exceed the reference value.deleted
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 11
(11) The assessment of effective action will benefit from taking compliance with general government expenditure and tax revenue targets as a reference in conjunction with the implementation of planned specific revenue measures.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 186 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 1a
1a. When it exceeds the reference value, and provided the economy has been operating over the past three years above its potential, the ratio of the government debt to gross domestic product (GDP) is to be considered sufficiently diminishing and approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace in accordance with Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty if the differential with respect to the reference value has reduced over the previous three years at a rate of the order of one- twentieth per year. For a period of 3 years from [date of entering into force of this Regulation - to be inserted], account shall be taken of the backward- looking nature of this indicator in its application.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, when preparing a report under Article 126(3) of the Treaty shall take into account all relevant factors as indicated in that Article. The report shall appropriately reflect developments in the medium-term economic position (in particular potential growth, prevailing cyclical conditions, inflation, excessive macroeconomic imbalances, the private sector net savings position) and developments in the medium-term budgetary position (in particular, fiscal consolidation efforts in “good times”, public investment, the implementation of policies in the context of the common growth strategy for the Union and the overall quality of public finances, in particular, compliance with Council Directive […] on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States). The report shall also analyse developments in the medium-term debt position as relevant (in particular, it appropriately reflects risk factors including the maturity structure and currency denomination of the debt, stock-flow operations, accumulated reserves and other government assets; guarantees, notably linked to the financial sector; liabilities both explicit and implicit related to ageing and private debt to the extent that it may represent a contingent implicit liability for the government). Furthermore, the Commission shall give due consideration to any other factors which, in the opinion of the Member State concerned, are relevant in order to comprehensively assess in qualitative terms the excess over the reference value and which the Member State has put forward to the Commission and to the Council. In that context, special consideration shall be given to financial contributions to fostering international solidarity and to achieving Union policy goals, including financial stability, social and regional cohesion..
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. ‘The Commission and the Council shall make a balanced overall assessment of all the relevant factors, specifically, the extent to which they affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and/or the debt criteria as aggravating or mitigating factors. When assessing compliance on the basis of the deficit criterion, if the ratio of the government debt to GDP exceeds the reference value, these factors shall be taken into account in the steps leading to the decision on the existence of an excessive deficit provided for in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of Article 126 of the Treaty only if the double condition of the overarching principle — that, before these relevant factors are taken into account, the general government deficit remains close to the reference value and its excess over the reference value is temporary — is fully met.’deleted
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 5
(d a) paragraph 5 is amended as follows: The Commission and the Council, in all budgetary assessments in the framework of the excessive deficit procedure shall give due consideration to the implementation of structural reforms which are conducive to the achievement of the Union’s objectives on sustainable economic, social and environmentally responsible growth.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 218 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. In the case of Member States where the excess of the deficit or the breach of the requirements of the debt criterion according to Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty reflects the implementation of a pension reform introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillarthose reforms that maintain existing jobs and create new and better jobs as well as reforms based on public investments, the Commission and the Council shall also consider the cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar when assessing developments in EDP deficit and debt figures. In cases where the debt ratio exceeds the reference value, the cost of the reform shall be considered only if the deficit remains close to the reference value. For that purpose, for a period of five years starting from the date of entry into force of such a reform, consideration shall be given to its net cost as reflected in deficit and debt developments on the basis of a linear degressive scale. Additionally, irrespective of the date of entry into force of the reform, its net cost as reflected in debt developments shall be given consideration for a transitional period of five years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation, to be inserted] on the basis of the same linear degressive scale. The net cost as thus calculated shall be taken into account also for the decision of the Council under Article 126(12) of the Treaty on the abrogation of some or all of its decisions under paragraphs 6 to 9 and 11 of Article 126 of the Treaty, if the deficit has declined substantially and continuously and has reached a level that comes close to the reference value and, in case of non- fulfilment of the requirements of the debt criterion, the debt has been put on a declining path. Moreover, equal consideration shall be given to the reduction in this net cost resulting from the partial or total reversal of an above mentioned pension reform.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 304 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 16
Fines referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation shall constitute other revenue referred to in Article 311 of the Treaty and shall be distributed among participating Member States which do not have excessivhave an economic trade deficit as determined in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty and which are not the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No […/…], in proportion to their share in the total gross national income (GNI) of the eligible Member State, strictly linked to sustainable economic, social and environmental investments.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 144 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) To set an end to the current fragmented situation in which some Member States have taken divergent measures and to restrict the possibility of divergent measures being taken by competent authorities it is important to address the potential risks arising from short selling and credit default swaps in a harmonised mannercoordinated manner. In that connection, it should still be possible for Member States to adopt stricter rules. The requirements to be imposed should address the identified risks without unduly detracting from the benefits that short selling provides to the quality and efficiency of markets, taking specific account of the problems that short selling causes in terms of market quality and efficiency. In particular, uncovered short selling and short selling in connection with commodities should be prohibited.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 186 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Uncovered short selling of shares and sovereign debt is sometimes viewed as increasing the potential risk of settlement failure and volatility. To reduce such risks it is appropriate to place proportionate restrictions on uncovered short selling. The detailed restrictions should take into account the different arrangements currently used for covered short selling. Uncovered short selling and, in general, short selling in connection with commodities should be prohibited, since transactions of this kind offer no benefits for the economy as a whole and create systemic risks which cannot be assessed or identified in advance and for which, should the short seller default, in future a central counterparty, but ultimately the taxpayer once again, will be liable. If risk hedging in connection with commodities is necessary, it can be carried out using other instruments, such as futures and options. It is also appropriate to include requirements on trading venues relating to buy-in procedures and fines for failed settlement of transactions in those instruments. The buy-in procedures and late settlement requirements should set basic standards relating to settlement discipline.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Market making activities play a crucial role in providing liquidity to the markets within the Union and. The role of market makers nis to guaranteed to take short positions to perform that role. Imposing requirements on such activities could severely inhibit their ability to provide liquidity and have a significant adverse impact on the efficiency of the Union markets. Furhe tradeability (market liquidity) of securities by continually fixing bid and ask prices. In a functioning market, a sale is possible only on the basis of the terms set by the market maker. In general, stock exchange rules require market makers only to indicate the minimum volume of shares or bonds to be bought. In addition, pre-determined maximum spreads must not be exceeded, although no fair, mathematically calculable value need be indicated. Instead the market maker can himself determine the pricing criteria. If ther market makers would not be expected to take significant short positions except for very brief periods. It is therefore appropriate to exempt natural or legal persons involved in such activities from requirements which may impair their ability to perform such a function and therefore adversely affect the Union market ceases his activities and does not take the shares back, the second market then also becomes illiquid, or, if the transaction is being effected via a central counterparty, a requirement arises for the latter to intervene. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation should apply to natural or legal persons involved in such market making activities. In order to capture equivalent third country entities a procedure is necessary to assess the equivalence of the third country markets. The exemption should apply to the different types of market making activity but not to exempt proprietary trading. It is also appropriate to exempt certain primary market operations such as those relating to sovereign debt and stabilisation schemes as they are important activities that assist the efficient functioning of markets. Competent authorities should be notified of the use of exemptions and should have the power to prohibit a natural or legal person from using an exemption if they do not fulfil the relevant criteria in the exemption. Competent authorities should also be able to request information from the natural or legal person to monitor their use of the exemption.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 201 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In the case of a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue a competent authority should also have the ability to temporarily restrict short selling of the financial instrument on that venue in order to be able to rapidly intervene rapidly where appropriate and for a 24 hour period to prevent a disorderly price fall of the instrument concerned for a period commensurate with the seriousness of the disruption of the financial market.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 208 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Since some Member States have already put in place restrictions on short selling and since delegated acts and binding technical standards are provided for which should be adopted before the framework to be introduced can be us, the regulation covering the Union as a whole should come into force as soon as possible. This is necessary in the light of the persistently high degree of market instability and the problems in connection with sovereign credit defaully applied, it is necessary to provide for a sufficient period of timt swaps, so that the stability which the regulation is intended to bring about is a pressing need for the Union as a whole.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 210 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 3
(3) debt instruments issued by a Member State or, the Union itself or a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union and derivatives set out in Annex I Section C points (4) to (10) of Directive 2004/39/EC that relate to such debt instruments issued by a Member State or the Union or to an obligation of a Member State or the Union.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 221 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p
p) "short sale" in relation to a share or debt means any sale of the share or debt which the seller does not own at the time of entering into the agreement to sell including such a sale where at the time of entering into the agreement to sell the seller has borrowed or agreed to borrow the share or debt for delivery at settlementthe share or debt. Uncovered short sales shall be prohibited;
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 228 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the purposes of this Regulation, a position resulting from either of the following shall be considered a short position relating to the issued share capital of a company or the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or the Union:
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) a short sale of a share issued by the company or a debt instrument issued by the Member State or Union or a systemically relevant institution;
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 238 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For the purposes of this Regulation, a position resulting from either of the following shall be considered a long position relating to the issued share capital of a company or issued sovereign debt of a Member State or the Union:
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 240 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) holdinga short sale of a share issued by the company or a debt instrument issued by the Member State or Union or a systemically relevant institution;
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 244 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of this Regulation, the position remaining after deducting any long position that a natural or legal person holds in relation to the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or the Uniondebt from any short position that that natural or legal person holds in relation to the same debt shall be considered a net short position in relation to the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or the Uniondebt.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. The calculation under paragraphs 1 to 5 for sovereign debt shall be for each single Member State or for, for the Union or for a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union even if separate entities within the Member State or the Union issue sovereign debt on behalf of the Member State or Union.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 257 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of this Regulation, a natural or legal person shall be considered to have an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or, the Union or a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union, to the extent that the credit default swap is not serving to hedge against the risk of default of the issuer where the natural or legal person has a long position in the sovereign debt of that issuer or any long position in the debt of an issuer for which the price of its debt has a high correlation with the price of the obligation of a Member State or the Union. The party under a credit default swap that is obliged to make the payment or pay the compensation in the event of a default or a credit event relating to the reference entity does not by reason of that obligation have an uncovered position for the purposes of this paragraph.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 300 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) a net short position relating to the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or of, of the Union or of a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union;
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 303 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or, the Union or a systemically relevant institution resident or established in the Union.
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 333 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A natural or legal person may only enter into a short sale of a share admitted to trading on a trading venue or a short sale of a sovereign debt instrument where one of the following conditions is fulfilled:
2011/01/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 340 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the natural or legal person has borrowed the share or sovereign debt instrument;
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 347 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the natural or legal person has entered into an agreement to borrow the share or sovereign debt instrument;
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 350 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) the natural or legal person has an arrangement with a third party under which that third party has confirmed that the share or sovereign debt instrument has been located and reserved for lending for the natural or legal person so that settlement can be effected when it is duetransaction does not constitute uncovered short selling.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 367 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Short selling of shares or bonds connected with commodities and credit default swaps shall be prohibited.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 369 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. A share or debt instrument may be short sold only if the short sale is effected at the bid rate immediately after a fixing at which the share price has risen or remained unchanged.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 404 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
Exemption where the principal trading venue is outside the Union 1. Articles 5, 7, 12 and 13 shall not apply to shares of a company admitted to trading on a trading venue in the Union where the principal venue for the trading of the shares is located in a country outside the Union. 2. The relevant competent authority for shares of a company that are traded on a trading venue in the Union and a venue located outside the Union shall determine, at least every two years, whether the principal venue for the trading of those shares is located outside the Union. The relevant competent authority shall notify ESMA of any such shares identified as having their principal venue located outside the Union. ESMA shall publish the list of shares for which the principal venue is located outside the Union every two years. The list shall be effective for a two year period. 3. Powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt regulatory technical standards specifying the method for calculation of the turnover to determine the principal venue for the trading of a share. The regulatory standards referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with Articles [7 to 7d] of Regulation (EU) No …/….[ESMA Regulation]. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [31 December 2011] at the latest. 4. In order to ensure uniform conditions of application of paragraphs 1 and 2 powers are conferred on the Commission to adopt implementing technical standards to determine: a) the date on which and period in respect of which any calculation of the principal venue for a share shall be made; b) the date by which the relevant competent authority shall notify ESMA of those shares where the principal venue is outside the Union; c) the date from which the list shall be effective following publication by ESMA. The implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with Article [7e] of Regulation (EU) No …/….[ESMA Regulation]. ESMA shall submit drafts for those implementing technical standards to the Commission by [31 December 2011] at the latest.Article 14 deleted
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 410 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Articles 5, 6, 7, 8 and 12 shall notalso apply to the activities of an investment firm or a third country entity or a local firm that is a member of a trading venue or of a market in a third country, whose legal and supervisory framework has been declared equivalent pursuant to paragraph 2, when it deals as principal in a financial instrument, whether traded on or outside a trading venue, in either or both of the following capacities:
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 431 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Articles 8 and 12 shall notalso apply to the activities of a natural or legal person when, acting as an authorised primary dealer pursuant to an agreement with an issuer of sovereign debt, it is dealing as principal in a financial instrument in relation to primary or secondary market operations relating to the sovereign debt.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 435 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Articles 5, 6, 76 and 127 shall not apply to a natural or legal person when it enters into a short sale of a security or has a net short position in relation to the carrying out of a stabilisation under Chapter III of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2273/2003.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 437 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. The exemptions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3 shall only apply where the natural or legal person concerned has first notified the competent authority of its home Member State, in writing that they intend to make use of the exemption. The notification shall be made not less than thirty calendar days before the natural or legal person intends to use the exemption.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 440 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 9
9. The competent authority of the home Member State may request information, in writing, from a natural or legal person operating under the exemptions set out inprovisions of paragraph 1, 3 or 4 about short positions held or activities conducted under the exemption. The natural or legal person shall provide the information not later than four calendar days after the request is made at the latest.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 462 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority of a Member State may limit natural or legal persons from entering into credit default swap transactions relating to an obligation of a Member State or the Union or limit the value of uncovered credit default swap positions that may be entered into by natural or legal persons that relate to an obligation of a Member State or the Union, where both the following conditions are fulfilled: a) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or one or more other Member States; b) the measure is necessary to address the threat.deleted
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 474 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The measure shall apply only for a period not exceeding the end of the trading day following the trading day on whiccommensurate with the fall in price occurs.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 487 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
Any such measure may be renewed for a further periods not exceeding three months at a time commensurate with the seriousness of the market disruption.
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 494 #

2010/0251(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
c) limit natural or legal persons from entering into credit default swap transactions relating to an obligation of a Member State or, the Union or a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union or limit the value of uncovered credit default swap positions that a natural or legal person may enter into relating to an obligation of a Member State or, the Union or a systemically relevant institution domiciled or established in the Union;
2011/01/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) This Directive should not affect conditions of the provision of services in the framework of Article 56 of the TFEU. In particular, this Directive should not affect the terms and conditions of employment which, pursuant to Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 19968 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, apply to workers posted by an undertaking established in a Member State to provide a service in the territory of another Member State.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Considering the specially vulnerable situation of third-country national seasonal workers and the temporary nature of their assignment, there is a need to define clearly the working conditions applicable to such workers in order to ensure legal certainty by referring such conditions to generally binding instruments providing effective protection of the rights of third- country seasonal workers, such as law or universally applicable collective agreementsfor special efforts by all stakeholders so as to counter all forms of discrimination. Accordingly, account needs to be taken of the principle of equal treatment, in particular as regards pay, i.e. by applying collective agreements and other arrangements on working conditions which have been concluded at all possible levels or for which there is statutory provision.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements of universal application, Member States may base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/orTo guarantee the principle of equality of treatment between European Union workers and third-country national seasonal workers, collective agreements of whatever kind which have been concluded by the most representative employers' and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territoryat any level, including at company level, and are applicable to the employment relationship should apply to third-country national seasonal workers.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Third-country national seasonal workers should be granted equal treatment in respect of those branches of social security listed in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems. This Directive should not confer more rights than those already provided in existing EU legislation in the field of social security for third-country nationals who have cross-border interests between Member States. Furthermore, this Directive should not grant rights in relation to situations which lie outside the scope of that EU legislation such as, for example, to family members residing in a third country. This is without prejudice to the non discriminatory application by Member States of national legislation providing for de minimis rules on contributions to pension systems.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) It should only be possible to apply for admission as a seasonal worker while the applicant is residing either in or outside the territory of the Member States.
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 82 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) To facilitate enforcement, relevant designated third parties such as trade unions or other associations should be able to lodge complaints and actions in order to ensure effective application of the Directive. This is considered necessary to address situations where seasonal workers are unaware of the existence of enforcement mechanisms or hesitant to use these in their own name, out of fear of possible consequences.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Member States must ensure that appropriate checks and effective inspections are carried out in order to guarantee proper enforcement of this Directive. To that end, Member States must grant the competent authorities sufficient powers and resources. The results of inspections must be collated in an appropriate report and will serve to improve enforcement of this Directive.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point f
(f) ‘universally applicable collective agreement’ means a collective agreement which must be observed by all undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned. In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements to be of universal application, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collectivell kinds of collective agreements which have been concluded at any level, including at company level, and agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers' and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory applicable to the employment relationship of seasonal workers.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) To facilitate enforcement, relevant designated third parties such as trade unions or other associations should be able to lodge complaints and file lawsuits in order to ensure effective application of the Directive. This is considered necessary to address situations where seasonal workers are unaware of the existence of enforcement mechanisms or hesitant to use these in their own name, out of fear of possible consequences.
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 120 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as the principles laid down in conventions of the International Labour Organisation, in particular Convention 118 of 28 June 1962 on Equality of Treatment, Convention 97 of 1 July 1949 on Migration for Employment and Convention 143 of 24 June 1975 on Migrant Workers.
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 129 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – introductory part
WhateverRegardless of the law applicable to the employment relationship, seasonal workers shall be entitled tothe principle of equality of treatment with Member State national workers shall apply to seasonal workers:
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 1 – subparagraph 1
1. working conditions, including pay and dismissal, working hours and holidays, as well as health and safety requirements at the workplace, applicable to seasonal work as laid down by, taking into account not only the relevant laws, regulations or administrative provision and/or universally applicable collective agreements in the Member State to which they have been admitted according to this Directives, but also the collective agreements concluded at any level of the Member State concerned which are applicable to the employment relationship.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements to be of universal application, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers' and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory;deleted
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – introductory part
2. eEqual treatment with nationals of the host Member State as regards at least with regard toshall relate to the following rights in particular:
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – point a
(a) freedom of association and affiliation and membership of an organisation representing workers or of any organisation whose members are engaged in a specific occupation, including the right to take part in actions aimed at the conclusion of collective agreements, including strike action, and also including the benefits conferred by such organisations, without prejudice to the national provisions on public policy and public security;
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) the right to refuse to work where seasonal workers are used to break a strike;
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – point d
(d) access to goods and services and the supply of goods and services made available to the public, except public housing and counselling services afforded by employment services.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – point d a (new)
(da) the right to submit complaints regarding their employer to the competent authorities and/or to bring actions before the competent courts, directly or through third parties such as employee organisations in accordance with the corresponding national statutory provisions, in order effectively to enforce the rights deriving from this Directive. The Member States shall provide effective mechanisms to safeguard this right.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may reject an application if the employer has been sanctioned in conformity with national law for undeclared work and/or illegal employment.:
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 185 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a (new)
(a) been sanctioned in conformity with national law for undeclared work and/or illegal employment,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 187 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b (new)
(b) failed to meet the working conditions and remunerations as laid down in applicable collective agreements,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 189 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point c (new)
(c) used third-country national seasonal workers to break a strike,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 190 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point d (new)
(d) the employer has failed to meet his obligations concerning taxation and social security,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 202 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) wherever the conditions laid down in Article 5 were not met or are no longer met; or
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 205 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for reasons of public policy, public security or public health., in particular if:
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 206 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (new)
i) the employer has been sanctioned in conformity with national law for undeclared work and/or illegal employment,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 207 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (new)
ii) the employer has been sanctioned under Article 12(2),
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 208 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii (new)
iii) the employer has failed to meet the working conditions and remunerations as laid down in applicable collective agreements and national law,
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 209 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iv (new)
iv) the employer has used third-country national seasonal workers to break a strike.
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 238 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) upon application, issue up to three seasonal worker permits covering up to three subsequent seasons within one administrative act (‘multi-seasonal worker permit’), ordeleted
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 248 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a third-country national who has not, in a severe manner, failed to compliedy with the obligations arising from the admission decision during a previous stay as a seasonal worker, and in particular with the obligation to return to a third country on the expiry of the permit, shall be excluded from admission as seasonal worker for one or more subsequent years;
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 269 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – point a
(a) the right to enter and stay in the territoryies of the Member State issuing the permitof the European Union;
2011/07/20
Committee: LIBEEMPL
Amendment 29 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
– Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 79(2)(a) and (b) and 153 (1)(a) and (b),thereof,
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 36 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth7 sets the objective of the Union becoming an economy based on knowledge and innovation, reducing the administrative burden on companies and better matching labour supply with demand. Measures to make it easier for third-country managers, specialists or graduate trainees to enter the Union in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer should be seen in this broader context.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 39 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) For the purpose of this Directive, intra-corporate transferees encompass managers, and specialists and graduate trainees with a higher education qualification. Their definition builds on specific commitments of the Union under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and bilateral trade agreements. Those commitments undertaken under the General Agreement on Trade in Services do not cover conditions of entry, stay and work. Therefore, this Directive complements and facilitates the application of those commitments. However, the scope of the intra-corporate transfers covered by this Directive is broader than that implied by trade commitments, as the transfers do not necessarily take place within the services sector and may originate in a third country which is not party to a trade agreement.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Intra-corporate transferees should benefit from the same working conditions as posted workers whose employer is established on the territory of the European Union, as defined by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. That requirementThis Directive is intended to protect workers and guarantee fair competition between undertakings established in a Member State and those established in a third country, as it ensures that the latter will not be able to benefit from lower labour standards to take any competitive advantage.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The set of rules established by this Directive is also beneficial to the migrants’ countries of origin as this temporary migration fosters transfers of skills, knowledge, technology and know- how.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 49 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Member States must ensure that appropriate checks and effective inspections are carried out in order to guarantee proper enforcement of this Directive. To that end, Member States must grant the competent authorities sufficient powers and resources. The results of inspections must be collated in an appropriate report and will serve to improve enforcement of this Directive.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Third-country nationals who apply to be admitted as graduate trainees should provide evidence of the higher education qualifications required, namely of any diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications attesting the successful completion of a post-secondary higher education programme of at least three years. In addition, they must present a training agreement, including a description of the training programme, its duration and the conditions in which the trainees will be supervised, proving that they will benefit from genuine training and not be used as normal workers.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Equal treatment should be granted under national law in respect of those branches of social security defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems. Since this Directive is without prejudice to provisions included in bilateral agreements, the social security rights enjoyed by third country national intra-corporate transferees on the basis of a bilateral agreement concluded between the Member State to which the person has been admitted and his or her country of origin could be strengthened compared to the social security rights which would be granted to the transferee under national law. This Directive should not confer more rights than those already provided for in existing Union legislation in the field of social security for third-country nationals who have cross-border interests between Member States.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Unless this condition conflicts with the principle of Union preference as expressed in the relevant provisions of the Acts of Accession, no labour market test should be required, since this criterion would be in contradiction with the purpose of setting up a transparent and simplified scheme for admission of intra- corporate transferees.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 76 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) third-country nationals carrying out activities as temporary agency workers for an independent temporary agency or for a temporary agency within a company or a group of undertakings.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
(cc) third-country nationals with a temporary contract with the undertaking of origin.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. With the agreement of the social partners, Member States may restrict the scope of this Directive to particular sectors and subsectors of activity.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In order to make the specific set of rules put in place by this Directive more attractive and to allow it to produce all expected benefits for competitiveness of business in the Union, third-country national intra-corporate transferees should be granted favourable conditions for family reunification in the Member State which first grants the residence permit on the basis of this Directive. This right would indeed remove an important obstacle to potential intra-corporate transferees for accepting an assignment. In order to preserve family unity, family members should be able to join the intra-corporate transferee in any other Member State under the conditions determined by the national law of such Member State.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 82 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point b
(b) ‘intra-corporate transfer’ means the temporary secondment of a third-country national from an undertaking established outside the territory of a Member State and to which the third-country national is bound by a work contract, to an entity belonging to the undertaking or to the same group of undertakings which is established inside this territory, under a new work contract with that entity;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point a
(a) the conditions of entry to and residence for more than three monthsand work permission in the territory of the Member States of third-country nationals and of their family members in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer;
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 89 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point b
(b) the conditions of entry to and residence for more than three months of third- country nationals, referred to in point (a), in Member States other than the Member State which first grants the third- country national a residence permit on the basis of this Directive.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 90 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point e
(e) ‘manager’ means any person working in a senior position, who principally directs the management of the host entity, receiving general supervision or direction principally from the board of directors or stockholders of the business or equivalent; this position includes: directing the host entity or a department or sub-division of the host entity, supervising and controlling the work of other supervisory, professional or managerial employees, having the authority personally to hire and dismiss or recommend hiring, dismissing or other personnel actions;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to third- country nationals who reside outside the territory of a Member State and apply to be admitted to the territory of a Member State in the framework of an intra- corporate transfer.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 96 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point f
(f) 'specialist’ means any person possessing uncommon knowledge essential and specific to the host entity, taking acwho is transferred for highly qualified employment , having higher professional qualifications, knowledge at an advanced level and count not only of knowledge specific to the host entity, but also of whetherinuous expertise, and who possesses specific knowledge essential or relevant to the sperson has a high level of qualification referring to a type of work or trade requiring specific technical knowledgecific activities of the host entity;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point g
(g) ‘graduate trainee’ means any person with a higher education qualification who is transferred to broaden his/her knowledge of and experience in a company in preparation for a managerial position within the company;deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point n
(n) ‘universally applicable collective agreement’ means all types of collective agreement which must be observed by all undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned. In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements of universal application, Member States may base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territoryhave been concluded at any possible level, including the level of firms and undertakings, and which apply in the entity of the undertaking to which the specialist or manager has been transferred.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) provide evidence that he or she has the professional qualifications needed in the Member State to which he or she has been admitted for the position of manager or specialist or, for graduate trainees, the higher education qualifications requiredfor the position of manager or specialist;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall require that all conditions in the law, regulations or administrative provisions and/or universally applicable collective agreements applicable to posted workers in a similar situation in the relevant occupational branches are met with regard to the remuneration granted during the transfer.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements to be of universal application, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers' and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) provide evidence of employment within the same group of undertakings, for at least 12 months immediately preceding the date of the intra-corporate transfer, if required by national legislation, and that he or she will be able to transfer back to an entity belonging to that group of undertakings and established in a third country at the end of the assignment;
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 152 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – introductory part
Whatever the law applicable to the employment relationship, intra-corporate transferees shall be entitled to:covered by the principle of equal treatment with national employees.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – point 1 – subparagraph 1
the terms and conditions of employment applicable to posted workers in a similar situation, as laid down by law, regulation or administrative provision and/or universally applicable collective agreements in the Member State to which they have been admitted pursuant to this Directive.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) the remuneration granted during the transfer, and its accordance with any collective agreements applicable to the host entity;
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 161 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements to be of universal application, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers' and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – point 2 – introductory part
eEqual treatment with nationals of the host Member State as regardsshall relate to the following rights in particular:
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – point 2 – point a
(a) freedom of association and affiliation and membership of an organisation representing workers or employers or of any organisation whose members are engaged in a specific occupation, including the right to take part in actions aimed at the conclusion of collective agreements, including strike action, and also including the benefits conferred by such organisations, without prejudice to the national provisions on public policy and public security;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall require that all conditions in the law, regulations or administrative provisions and/or universally applicable collective agreements applicable to posted workers in a similar situation in the relevant occupational branches are met with regard to the remuneration granted during the transfer.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 178 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) the right to submit complaints regarding their employer to the competent authorities and/or to bring actions before the competent courts, directly or through third parties such as employee organisations in accordance with the corresponding national statutory provisions, in order effectively to enforce the rights deriving from this Directive. The Member States shall provide effective mechanisms to safeguard this right;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements to be of universal application, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on collective agreements which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers‘ and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 179 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) the right to refuse to work where intra-corporate transferees are used to break a strike;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) access to goods and services and the supply of goods and services made available to the public, except public housing and counselling services afforded by employment services.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall reject an application if the employer or the host entity has been sanctioned in conformity with national law for undeclared work and/or illegal employment or if provisions regarding working conditions and salaries as laid down in collective agreements as applicable by national law are not observed or if the employer or host entity has hired workers to break a strike.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 192 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may reject an application on the grounds of volumes of admission of third-country nationals.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 197 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where the holder is residing for purposes other than those for which he/she was authorised to reside.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 210 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The application shall be considered and examined only when the third-country national is residing outside the territory of the Member State to which admission is sought.deleted
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 231 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – point 2
2. free access to the entire territoryies of the Member State issuing the permits of the European Union within the limits provided for by national law;
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 237 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2003/86/EC, residence permits for family members shall be granted by the first Member State, if the conditions for family reunification are fulfilled,. The competent authorities of the first Member State shall undertake to process the residence permit request for the family members at the same time as the permit request for the intra-corporate transferee. In more complex cases, the procedure shall be completed at the latest within two months from the date on which the application was lodged.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 242 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. By way of derogation from Article 14(2) of Directive 2003/86/EC, the family members of an intra-corporate transferee who have the right of residence in a Member State shall be entitled to take up employment or self-employment there, for the same duration as the transferee.
2011/07/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 17 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulates in Article 145 that Member States and the EU shall work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economic chaeducation, vocational traininge and with a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. Member States, having regard to national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour, shall regard promoting employment as a matterfurther training and integration of workers into labour markets, which have become – and will remain – necessary because of ecommon concern and shall coordinate their action in this respect withnomic change, with a view to achieving the Council, in accordance with the provisions ofobjectives set out in Article 1483 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The Treaty on European Union stipulates in Article 3.3 that the Union shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection and provides for the Union’svide social protection; it is also expected to take initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States' social policies. Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that in defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to promoting a high level of employment and to the guarantee of adequate social protection and the fight against social exclusion and linked to a high level of education and training and protection of health.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Lisbon Strategy, launched in 2000, was based on an acknowledgement of the EU’s need to increaspreserve its productivity and competitiveness, while enhancing social cohesion, in the face of global competition, economic interdependences and changes, technological change and an age changing population. The Lisbon Strategy was re- launched in 2005, after a mid-term review which led to greater focus on growth, more and better jobs. Ultimately, the Lisbon Strategy failed to achieve its targets. With its focus on competitiveness, cost-cutting, dismantling of the welfare state, ever more flexible labour markets, liberalisation of markets in general and deregulation of financial markets in particular, it aggravated inequality in the distribution of income and wealth, the growth of poverty, social exclusion, low- paid work and precarious employment. It is now time for an alternative strategy of the European Union for sustainable development, social justice and full employment.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs helped forge consensus aroundshould help to determine the broad direction of the EU’s economic and employment policies. Under the strategy, both broad economic policy guidelines and employment guidelines were adopted by the Council in 2005 and revised in 2008. The 24 guidelines laid the foundations for the national reform programmes, outlining the key macro-economic, micro-economic and labour market reform priorities for the EU as a whole. However, experience shows that the guidelines did not set clear enough priorities and that links between them could have been strongersufficiently binding objectives for social, political and cultural participation by all residents of the European Union and for the sustainable ecological conversion of the economy. This limited their impact on national policy- making.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The financial and economic crisis that started in 2008 resulted in a significant loss in jobs and potential output and has led to a dramatic deterioration in public finances. The European Economic Recovery Plan has nevertheless helped Member States to deal with the crisis, partly through a coordinated fiscal stimulus, with the euro providing an anchor for macroeconomic stability. The crisis therefore showed that coordination of Union's policies canould have delivered significant results if it ishad been strengthened and rendered effective. TIn addition, the crisis also underscored the close interdependence of the Member States’ economies and labour marketsfact that the internal market urgently needs to be complemented by a social and ecological Union so that fewer people need suffer from the impact of impending crises of capitalism.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) The Commission proposed to set up a new strategy for the next decade, the Europe 2020 Strategy, to enable the EU to emerge stronger from the crisis, and to turn its economy towards smart, and also respond more effectively to future upheavals and crises, and to turn its economy towards viable, ecologically and economically sustainable and inclusive growth. Five heconomic management. Headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives guiding the action of the Member States and of the Union. Member States should make every effort to meet the national targets and to remove the bottlenecks that constrain growthobstacles to a restructuring process accompanied by the creation of more, high-quality jobs.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) As part of comprehensive "exit strategies" for the economic crisis, Member States should carry out ambitious reforms to ensure an improved macroeconomic stability and the sustainability of public finance, improve competitiveness, reduce macroeconomic imbalances and enhance labour market performance. The withdrawal of the fiscal stimulus should be implemented and coordinated within the framework of the Stability and Growth Pacperformance targeting socially and environmentally sustainable development, reduce macroeconomic imbalances and enhance high quality employment and social protection. The fiscal stimulus should be continued for the next three to five years to overcome economic stagnation and rising unemployment. Coordinated fiscal stimulus at Member State and EU level must be oriented towards economic recovery via a targeted EU Recovery Plan which is streamlined in terms of gender-equality in all of its components, mobilising one per cent of EU GDP each year for investing in environmentally, socially and economically sustainable development, thus providing for an entry strategy for new quality employment.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Within the Europe 2020 strategy, Member States should implement reforms aimed at ‘smart growth’, i.e. growthmanagement of the economy’, i.e. which is driven by knowledge and innovation. Reforms should aim at improving the quality of education, ensuring access for all, and strengthenpreserving research and business performance in order to promote innovation and knowledge transfer throughout the EU. They should encourage entrepreneurship andconomic activity which helps to turn creative ideas into innovative products, innovative - particularly socially valuable - services and processes that can create growth, quality jobs, territorial, economic and social cohesion with a high level of comprehensive social protection, and address more efficiently European and global societal challenges. Making the most of information and communication technologies is essential in this context.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulates in Article 145 that Member States and the EU shall work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economic chaeducation, vocational traininge and with a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. Member States, having regard to national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour, shall regard promoting employment as a matter of common concern and shall coordinate their action in this respect withfurther training and integration of employees into labour markets, which have become – and will remain – necessary because of economic change with a view to achieving the Council, in accordance with the provisions ofobjectives set out in Article 1483 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The Treaty on European Union stipulates in Article 3.3 that the Union shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection and provides for the Union’svide social protection; it is also expected to take initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States' social policies. Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that in defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to promoting a high level of employment and to the guarantee of adequate social protection and the fight against social exclusion and linked to a high level of education and training and protection of health.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) Member States should also, through their reform programmes, aim at ‘sustainable growthdevelopment’. Sustainable growthdevelopment means building a resource- efficient, sustainable and competitive economy, a fair distribution of the cost and benefits and exploiting Europe’s leadership in the race to developeconomy, and developing new processes and technologies, includingparticularly green technologies. Member States should implement the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gases emissions and use resources efficiently. They should also improve the business environment for SMEs, stimulate creation of green, sustainable jobs and modernise their industrial base. Particularly in the field of conversion to different products, sufficient funding must be made available to be able to perform the resultant restructuring processes and deal with the impact on employees.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Member States’ reform programmes should also aim at ‘inclusive growth’. Inclusive growtheconomic management’. Inclusive economic management means building a cohesive society in which people are empowered to anticipate and manage change, thus to actively participate in politics, society and economycultural life. Member States’ reforms should therefore ensure access and opportunities for all throughout the lifecycle, thus to an income which prevents poverty and to service activities requiring skills, thus enabling them to pursue a dignified and autonomous life and reducing poverty and social exclusion, through removing barriers to labour market participation of employees' own choosing, especially for women, older workers, young people, disabled and legal – particularly women – young people, people with disabilities and migrants. They should also make sure that the benefits of economic growthsustainable and inclusive economic management reach all citizens and all regions. Ensuring effective functioning of thethat labour markets are inclusive through investing in successful integration and transitions, appropriate skills development, rising job quality in accordance with the 'decent work' principles of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and in the light of the conclusions of the informal meeting of Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs in Berlin from 18 to 20 January 2007 on the subject of 'good work'1, and fighting segmentation, structural unemployment and involuntary inactivity while ensuring adequate, sustainable social protection and active inclusion to reduce poverty should therefore be at the heart of Member States’ reform programmes.comprehensive social protection which goes beyond preventing poverty and social and cultural inclusion should therefore be at the heart of Member States’ reform programmes. At the same time, economic and social inequalities must be massively reduced. _____ 1 'Europe needs an improved, joint effort to promote ‘good work’, which covers workers’ rights and participation, fair pay, security and health protection at work, and organisation of work which takes families into account. Working conditions which are favourable and fair and appropriate social protection are necessary if the European Union is to be accepted by its citizens.'
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Lisbon Strategy, launched in 2000, was based on an acknowledgement of the EU’s need to increaspreserve its productivity and competitiveness, while enhancing social cohesion, in the face of global competition, economic interdependences and changes, technological change and an age changing population. The Lisbon Strategy was re- launched in 2005, after a mid-term review which led to greater focus on growth, more and better jobs. Ultimately, the Lisbon Strategy failed to achieve its targets. With its focus on competitiveness, cost-cutting, dismantling of the welfare state, ever more flexible labour markets, liberalisation of markets in general and deregulation of financial markets in particular it aggravated inequality in the distribution of income and wealth, the growth of poverty, social exclusion, low- wage work and precarious employment. It is now time for an alternative strategy of the European Union for sustainable development, social justice and full employment.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) In the light of the objective of 'inclusive growth', Member States should, at the initiative of the Commission, establish a legislative framework for the new forms of employment which places the employees concerned on an equal footing and facilitates employment which does not promote further fragmentation of the labour market and which guarantees comprehensive protection of the individual and collective rights of employees and affords them the requisite social protection.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) The EU's and Member States' structural reforms can effectively contribute to growth and jobs if they enhance the EU's competitiveness in the global economy, open up new opportunities for Europe's exporters and provide competitive access to vital imports. Reforms should therefore take into account their external competitiveness implications to foster European growth and participation in open and fair markets worldwide.deleted
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs helped forge consensus aroundshould help to determine the broad direction of the EU’s economic and employment policies. Under the strategy, both broad economic policy guidelines and employment guidelines were adopted by the Council in 2005 and revised in 2008. The 24 guidelines laid the foundations for the national reform programmes, outlining the key macro-economic, micro-economic and labour market reform priorities for the EU as a whole. However, experience shows that the guidelines did not set clear enough priorities and that links between them could have been strongersufficiently binding objectives for social, political and cultural participation by all residents of the European Union and for the sustainable ecological conversion of the economy. This limited their impact on national policy- making.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) When programming and implementing EU funding, including from the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, Member States should take account of the EU 2010 Strategy, particularly its employment policy and social policy aspects.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
(14) While these guidelines are addressed to Member States, it is essential that the Europe 2020 strategy should be implemented in partnership with all national, regional and local authorities, closely associating parliaments, as well as social partners and representatives of civil society, who shall. Social partners at national level have a particular role to play here, because without their participation it would not in practice be possible to implement the employment strategy in businesses. All parties must be given equal rights to contribute to the elaboration of national reform programmes, to their implementation and to the overall communication on the strategy.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) The Europe 2020 strategy is underpinned by a smaller set of guidelines, replacing the previous set of 24 and addressing employment and broad economic policy issues in a coherent manner. The guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States, annexed to this Decision, are intrinsically linked with the guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the Union, annexed to Council Recommendation […] of […]. Together, they form the ‘Europe 2020 integrated guidelines’.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The financial and economic crisis that started in 2008 resulted in a significant loss in jobs and potential output and has led to a dramatic deterioration in public finances. The European Economic Recovery Plan has nevertheless helped Member States to deal with the crisis, partly through a coordinated fiscal stimulus, with the euro providing an anchor for macroeconomic stability. The crisis therefore showed that coordination of the Union's policies canould have delivered significant results if it ishad been strengthened and rendered effective. TIn addition, the crisis also underscored the close interdependence of the Member States’ economies and labour marketsfact that the internal market urgently needs to be complemented by a social and ecological Union so that fewer people need suffer from the impact of impending crises of capitalism.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
(16) These new integrated guidelines reflect the conclusions of the European Council. They give precise guidance to the Member States on defining their national reform programmes and implementing reforms, reflecting interdependence and in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. . These guidelines will form the basis for any country-specific recommendations that the Council may address to the Member States. They will also form the basis for the establishment of the Joint Employment Report sent annually by the Council and Commission to the European Council.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 44 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In the meantime the measures taken and their results should be analysed academically and reviewed critically.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 7 – paragraph - 1 (new)
All policies made and measures taken in the framework of the Employment Guidelines shall strongly promote equality for women and men and shall be gender mainstreamed. This includes affirmative action policies aimed at enhancing women's rights and equality. Social protection systems should be reviewed with a view to abolishing elements that generate gender inequalities, better working conditions should be secured in sectors where women are heavily represented, involuntary part time employment decreased and gender equality in training and education ensured. In this framework, the EU sets a target to reduce the gender pay gap to 0- 5% by 2020. Furthermore, the EU sets targets on increased provision of accessible, affordable, flexible and high- quality care services for all, in particular access to child care facilities by aiming to ensure 70% of necessary care for 0-3 year-old children and 100% of care for 3- 6 year-old children and will introduce, over the time span of the EU 2020 Strategy, specific targets for the care of other dependents, including the elderly, on the basis of an ongoing assessment of actual and potential care needs.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 7 – paragraph 1
Member States should integratePrevious empirical surveys of the EU's labour markets have shown that flexibility of employment has the most deleterious impact on employability, as flexible employment contracts (employment below the flexicurity principles endorsed by the European Council into their labour market policies and apply themvel at which social security is compulsory, temporary agency work, fixed-term employment contracts, project work etc.) are associated not only with poorer social protection and smaller incomes but also with a lack of opportunities for further training, professional development and lifelong learning, and that the more flexible employment is, the more precarious it is. Member States should integrate and apply the concept of GOOD WORK, making full use of European Social Fund support with a view to increasing labour market participation and combating segmentation and involuntary inactivity, and gender inequality, whilst reducing structural unemployment. Measures to enhance flexibility and security should be both baThe concept of GOOD WORK puts a strong focus on promoting quality in work, improved social security and social inclusion, introducing new workers rights and enhancing existing ones, promoting health and safety at work, better social risk-management and the reconciliation of work and private life. Strong measures to enhance security by phasing out precarious employment and those atypical contractual arrangements related to such insecure forms of employment should be launched and mutually reinforcingby the Member States, with a view to restricting and reducing atypical forms of employment, the misuse of which should be punished. Member States shouldmust therefore introduce a combination of flexiblsecure and reliable employment contracts, active and integrative labour market policies, effective lifelong learning, policies to promote labour mobility, and adequatesupport the right to voluntarily- chosen labour mobility, and effective, high quality social security systems to secure professional transitions accompanied by clear rights and responsibilities for the unemployed to actively seek workdequate benefits and tailor-made measures to find quality employment or training and upgrading of their skills and competencies.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 47 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) The Commission proposed to set up a new strategy for the next decade, the Europe 2020 Strategy, to enable the EU to emerge stronger from the crisis, and to turn its economy towards smart, and also respond more effectively to future upheavals and crises, and to turn its economy towards viable, ecologically and economically sustainable and inclusive growth. Five heconomic management. Headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives guiding the action of the Member States and of the Union. Member States should make every effort to meet the national targets and to remove the bottlenecks that constrain growthobstacles to a restructuring process accompanied by the creation of more, high-quality jobs.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 7 – paragraph 2
Member States should step upuse social dialogue and tackle labour market segmentation with measures addressing temporary and precarious employment, underemployment and undeclared work. Professional mobility should be rewardeddiscrimination against women, migrants, older people and people with disabilities, underemployment and undeclared work. Undeclared employment should be fought through fiscal measures for low earners and for trades and crafts and through more intensive monitoring by labour inspectorate services and social insurance bodies. Professional mobility should be rewarded by measures under employment, social and fiscal legislation. The quality of jobswork and employment conditions shouldmust be addressed by fighting low-wages and by ensuring adequatepoverty-proof social security also for those on fixedwith precarious and other forms of atypical contracts and the self- employed. Employment services should beMember States should agree an EU target for minimum wages (whether statutory or collectively agreed at national, regional or sectoral level) to guarantee remuneration of at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average income and, further, lay down a timetable for achieving that target in all Member States. Employment services must be effectively strengthened and open to all, including young people and in particular those threatened by unemployment, and appropriate measures provided within the context of active, inclusive labour market policies, with personalised services targeting those furthest away from the labour market.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 49 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 7 – paragraph 3
In order to increase competitivenesspromote environmentally and socially sustainable development and raise participation levels, particularly for the low-skilled, and in line with economic policy guideline 2, Member States should reviewadapt tax and benefit systems and increase the capacity of public services to provide the necessary support. Member States should increase labour force participation through policies to promote active ageingthe concept of GOOD WORK, gender equality and equal pay for equal work or work of equal value, and labour market integration of young people, disabled, legal migrants and other vulnerable groups. In that respect a European Youth Guarantee securing the right of every young person in the EU to be offered a suitable well-paid job in line with their qualifications and skills, an apprenticeship, additional training or combined work and training immediately upon facing unemployment is necessary. Work-life balance policies with the provision of affordable care and innovation in work organisation should be geared to a reduction of working time without loss of pay and thus raising employment rates, particularly among youth, older workers and women, in particular to retain highly- skilled women in scientific and technical fields. Member States should also remove barriers to labour market entry for newcomers, support self-employment and job creation in areas including green employment and care and promote social innovationFurthermore, work-life balance policies should strengthen security in terms of employment transition based on good job protection by enhancing social rights and social protection to prevent risks to income and to ensure the maintenance and acquisition of pension rights and health-care coverage etc. during employment transitions, and also during leave periods (e.g. for caring for dependent persons, further training and education, sabbaticals etc.). Member States should promote the reconciliation of work and private life also by a clear reduction of the average weekly working time as well as a clear lowering of the weekly statutory maximum working hours and a strict limitation of overtime hours. Member States should also remove barriers to labour market entry for newcomers, support self-employment and job creation in areas including green employment and high-valued, in particular social services, and promote social innovation. Access to labour market for young people and newcomers should be enabled by limiting effectively working life.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 7 – paragraph 4
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is of aiming to bring by 2020 to 75% the employment rate for women and men aged 20-64 including through the greater participation of youth, older workers - especially older women - and low skilled workers and the better integration of legal migrants.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 53 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 8 – title
Guideline 8: Developing a skilled workforce responding to labour market needs, promoting job quality andImproving the level of education and training and further training among employees and promoting lifelong learning
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 8 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an adequate supply of knowledge and skills to match current and future demand in the labour markea broad supply of knowledge and skills in order that workers, under the conditions of permanent processes of restructuring and change in all three sectors of the labour market, can obtain a permanent, full-time job which ensures them a livelihood and enables social and cultural involvement. Quality initial education and attractive vocational training must be complemented with effective incentives for lifelong learning, second-chance opportunities, ensuring every adult at any time the chance to move one step up in their qualification, and by targeted migration and integration policies. Member States shouldmust develop systems for recognising acquired competencies, remove barriers to occupational and geographical mobility of workers, promote the acquisition of transversal competences and creativity, and focus their efforts particularly on supporting those with low skills, and increasing the employability of older workerscombat discrimination in connection with access to education and training and further training, while at the same time enhance the training, skills and experience of highly skilled workers, including researchers.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) As part of comprehensive "exit strategies" for the economic crisis, Member States should carry out ambitious reforms to ensure an improved macroeconomic stability and the sustainability of public finance, improve competitiveness, reduce macroeconomic imbalances and enhance labour market performance. The withdrawal of the fiscal stimulus should be implemented and coordinated within the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact. performance targeting socially and environmentally sustainable development, reduce macroeconomic imbalances and enhance high quality employment and social protection. The fiscal stimulus should be continued over the next three to five years to overcome economic stagnation and rising unemployment. Coordinated fiscal stimulus at Member State and EU level must be oriented towards economic recovery via targeted EU recovery plan which is streamlined in terms of gender-equality in all of its components, mobilising one per cent of EU GDP each year for investing in environmentally sustainable development, thus providing for an entry strategy for new quality employment.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 8 – paragraph 2
In cooperation with the social partners and business, Member States should improve access to training, strengthen education and career guidance combined with systematic information on, and appropriate measures to promote, new job openings and opportunities, promotion of entrepreneurshipbusiness involvement in education and training and further training and enhanced anticipation of skill needs. Investment in human resourcepersonnel planning and development, up- skilling and participation in lifelong learning schemes should be promoted through joint financial contributions from governments, individuals and employers. To support young people and in particular those not in employment, education or training, Member States in cooperation with the social partners, should enact schemes to help recent graduatesyoung people with or without a school leaving qualification find initial employment or further education and training opportunities, including apprenticeships, and intervene rapidly when young people become unemployed. Regular monitoring of the performance of up-skilling and anticipation policies should help identify areas for improvement and increase the responsiveness of education and training systems to labour market needsmake education and training systems more geared towards growth fields of work of the future. EU funds should be fully mobilised by Member States to support these objectives.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 9 – paragraph 1
In order to ensure access to quality education and training for all and to improve educational outcomes, Member States should invest efficiently in education and training and further training systems notably to raise the skill level of the EU's workforce, allowing it to meetrespond to the rapidly changing needs of modern labour marketsworld of work. Action should cover all sectors (from early childhood education and schools through to higher education, vocational education and training, as well as adult training) taking also into account learning in informal and non-formal contexts. Reforms should aim to ensure the acquisition of the key competencies that every individual needs for success in a knowledge-based economy, notably in terms of employability, further learning, or ICT skills. Steps should be taken to ensure learning mobility of young people and teachers becomes the normis facilitated. Member States should improve the openness and relevance of education and training systems, particularly by implementing national qualification frameworks enabling flexibleopen learning pathways, including for those who are older, and by developing partnerships between the worlds of education/training and work. The teaching profession should be made more attractive. Higher education should become more open to non-traditional learners and participation in tertiary or equivalent education should be increased. With a view to reducing the number of young people not in employment, education, or training, Member States should take all necessary steps to prevent early school leaving. For people who, for various reasons, are unable to participate in these systems, social protection which goes further than preventing poverty should be guaranteed. For people who, because of illness and/or disability, are no longer able to practise their previous occupation, special vocational further training and/or retraining measures should be provided.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 58 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 9 – paragraph 2
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is to reduce the drop out rate to 10%, whilst increasing the share of the population aged 30-34 having completed tertiary or equivalent education to at least 40% in 2020.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 59 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 10 – paragraph 1
Member States’To achieve this goal, Member States should intensify efforts to reduceliminate poverty, including working poor conditions. Efforts should be aimed at promoting full participation in society and, of people’s own deciding, in politics, society, the arts, and the economy and extending employment opportunities, making full use of the European Social Fund. Efforts should also concentrate on ensuringmaintaining and bringing about both equal opportunities, including through and access to affordable, sustainable and high -quality services and public services (including online services, in line with guideline 4) and in particular health care, specifically as regards social welfare, employment, health, and neighbourhood services. Member States should put in place active and effective anti-discrimination measures. Equally, to fight social exclusion, empower people and promote labour market participation, social protection systems, lifelong learning and active inclusion policies should be enhanced to create opportunities at different stages of people’s lives and shield them from the risk of exclusion. Social security and pension systems must be modernised to ensure that they can be fully deployed to ensure adequate income supportincome above the poverty threshold and access to healthcare — thus providing social cohesion — whilst at the same time remaining financially sustainable. Benefit systems should focus on ensuring income security during transitions and reducing poverty, in particular among groups most at risk from social exclusion, such as one- parent families, minorities, people with disabilities, children and young people, elderly women and men, legal migrants and the homeless. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and social innovation in support ofminorities, people with disabilities, children and young people, elderly women and men, migrants and the homeless. Member States should agree on an EU- wide commitment to ending street homelessness by 2015 and seek to frame integrated policy measures offering access to affordable decent housing with the necessary energy provision for all. The Council should agree on an EU target for minimum income systems and contribution-based income substitute benefit systems, whereby the income support provided should be not less than 60% of the national median equivalised income, and, in addition, on a compliance schedule. With a view to eliminating child poverty in the EU, Member States should undertake to achieve a 50% reduction by 2012, on the understanding that such a cut should not be measured by economic indicators alone, and should make the necessary provision to attain that goal. The fact that a child, in particular for one-parent families, should constitute a poverty risk is incompatible with the aims of the EU. The parents concerned should be shielded from that risk by means of free childcare, social support, and tailor- made support from employment agencies. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and social innovations designed to address the different social risks which arise during people’s lifetime, especially where the most vulnerable. are concerned.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Guideline 10 – paragraph 2
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is to reduce by 25% the number ofeliminate poverty and, as a first step, reduce by 50 % by 2015 the number of people in the Europeans Union living below the national poverty lines, lifting over 20 million people out of poverty.
2010/06/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Within the Europe 2020 strategy, Member States should implement reforms aimed at ‘smart growth’, i.e. growthmanagement of the economy’, i.e. which is driven by knowledge and innovation. Reforms should aim at improving the quality of education, ensuring access for all, and strengthenpreserving research and business performance in order to promote innovation and knowledge transfer throughout the EU. They should encourage entrepreneurship andconomic activity which helps to turn creative ideas into innovative products, innovative - particularly socially valuable - services and processes that can create growth, quality jobs, territorial, economic and social cohesion with a high level of comprehensive social protection, and address more efficiently European and global societal challenges. Making the most of information and communication technologies is essential in this context.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) Member States should also, through their reform programmes, aim at sustainable growth’development. Sustainable growthdevelopment means building a resource- efficient, sustainable and competitive economy, a fair distribution of the cost and benefits and exploiting Europe’s leadership in the race to developeconomy, and developing new processes and technologies, includingparticularly green technologies. Member States should implement the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gases emissions and use resources efficiently. They should also improve the business environment for SMEs, stimulate creation of green, sustainable jobs and modernise their industrial base. Particularly in the field of conversion to different products, sufficient funding must be made available to be able to perform the resultant restructuring processes and deal with the impact on employees.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Member States’ reform programmes should also aim at ‘inclusive growth’. Inclusive growtheconomic management’. Inclusive economic management means building a cohesive society in which people are empowered to anticipate and manage change, thus to actively participate in politics, society and economycultural life. Member States’ reforms should therefore ensure access and opportunities for all throughout the lifecycle, thus to an income which prevents poverty and to service activities requiring skills, thus enabling them to pursue a dignified and autonomous life and reducing poverty and social exclusion, through removing barriers to labour market participation of employees' own choosing, especially for women, older workers, young people, disabled and legal – particularly women – young people, people with disabilities and migrants. They should also make sure that the benefits of economic growthsustainable and inclusive economic management reach all citizens and all regions. Ensuring effective functioning of thethat labour markets are inclusive through investing in successful transitions, appropriate skills development, rising job quality and fighting segmentation, structural unemployment and inactivity while ensuring adequate, sustainable social protection and active inclusion to reduce poverty should therefore be at the heart of Member States’ reform programmesin accordance with the 'decent work' principles of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and in the light of the conclusions of the informal meeting of Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs in Berlin from 18 to 20 January 2007 on the subject of 'good work', namely that Europe needs an improved, joint effort to promote ‘good work’, which covers workers’ rights and participation, fair pay, security and health protection at work, and organisation of work which takes families into account, as well as working conditions which are favourable and fair and appropriate social protection, which are necessary if the European Union is to be accepted by its citizens, and fighting segmentation, structural unemployment and involuntary inactivity while ensuring comprehensive social protection which goes beyond preventing poverty and social and cultural inclusion should therefore be at the heart of Member States’ reform programmes. At the same time, economic and social inequalities must be massively reduced.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) In the light of the objective of 'inclusive growth', Member States should, upon a proposal from the Commission, establish a legislative framework for the new forms of employment which places the employees concerned on an equal footing and facilitates employment which does not promote further fragmentation of the labour market and which guarantees comprehensive protection of the individual and collective rights of employees and affords them the requisite social protection.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) The EU's and Member States' structural reforms can effectively contribute to growth and jobs if they enhance the EU's competitiveness in the global economy, open up new opportunities for Europe's exporters and provide competitive access to vital imports. Reforms should therefore take into account their external competitiveness implications to foster European growth and participation in open and fair markets worldwide.deleted
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) When programming and implementing EU funding, including from the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, Member States should take account of the EU 2010 Strategy, particularly its employment policy and social policy aspects.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
(14) While these guidelines are addressed to Member States, it is essential that the Europe 2020 strategy should be implemented in partnership with all national, regional and local authorities, closely associating parliaments, as well as social partners and representatives of civil society, who shallrepresentatives of civil society. Social partners at national level have a particular role to play here, because without their participation it would not in practice be possible to implement the employment strategy in businesses. All parties must be given equal rights to contribute to the elaboration of national reform programmes, to their implementation and to the overall communication on the strategy.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) The Europe 2020 strategy is underpinned by a smaller set of guidelines, replacing the previous set of 24 and addressing employment and broad economic policy issues in a coherent manner. The guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States, annexed to this Decision, are intrinsically linked with the guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the Union, annexed to Council Recommendation […] of […]. Together, they form the ‘Europe 2020 integrated guidelines’.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
(16) These new integrated guidelines reflect the conclusions of the European Council. They give precise guidance to the Member States on defining their national reform programmes and implementing reforms, reflecting interdependence and in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. These guidelines will form the basis for any country-specific recommendations that the Council may address to the Member States. They will also form the basis for the establishment of the Joint Employment Report sent annually by the Council and Commission to the European Council.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In the meantime the measures taken and their results should be analysed academically and reviewed critically.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline -7 (new)
Guideline: Gender equality Member States will, through specific gender equality targets, gender mainstreaming and specific policy actions, increase female employment that fully respects women's rights and eliminate the gender pay gap, discrimination, and gender gaps in employment and unemployment rates; Member States should aim to achieve a 75% employment rate for women and men (based on full-time equivalents) by 2020, through, inter alia, - more public and private investment, more quality public services and support for families and individuals; - ensuring accessible, affordable, flexible and high-quality services, in particular, access to child care facilities by aiming to ensure conditions for 50% of necessary care for 0-3 year-old children and 100% of care for 3-6 year-old children, and improved access to care for other dependents, in particular older persons; - addressing precarious working conditions since the majority affected by them are women; - more and better use of skills of women belonging to minorities and migrants; - recognition of the rights of assisting spouses and life partners, who in majority of cases are women, who provide help in handicrafts, trade, agriculture, fisheries and small family businesses, to appropriate protection in the field of social security and of their work; - improving working conditions and the valuation of work in sectors where mostly women are represented (i.e., care and domestic work, certain service sectors,); Member States should step up their efforts to fully apply the principle of equal pay for equal work and aim to reduce the gender pay gap to 0-5% by 2020. These targets will be supported by the Commission revised Directive 75/117/EEC, a legislative proposal which is more effective than the existing legislation and which provides for measures in the event of a breach of the right to equal pay, and to ensure that these are dissuasive and proportional (for instance, higher sanctions in case of repeat offences);
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph -1 (new)
All policies and measures taken in the framework of the Employment Guidelines shall strongly promote equality for women and men and shall be gender mainstreamed. This includes affirmative action policies aimed at enhancing women´s rights and equality. Social protection systems should be reviewed with a view to abolish elements that generate gender inequalities, better working conditions should be secured in sectors where women work, involuntary part time employment decreased and gender equality in training and education ensured. In this framework, the EU sets a target to reduce the gender pay gap to 0- 5% by 2020. Furthermore, the EU sets targets on increased provision of accessible, affordable, flexible and high- quality care services for all, in particular access to child care facilities by aiming to ensure 70% of necessary care for 0-3 years old children and 100% of care for 3- 6 years old children and will introduce over the time span of the EU 2020 Strategy specific targets for the care of other dependents, including the elderly, on the basis of an ongoing assessment of actual and potential care needs.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 1
Member States should integratePrevious empirical surveys of the EU's labour markets have shown that flexibility of employment has the most deleterious impact on employability, as flexible employment contracts (employment below the flexicurity principles endorsed by the European Council into their labour market policies and apply them, making full use of European Social Fund support with a view to increasing labour market participation and combating segmentation and inactivity, gender inequality, whilst reducing structural unemployment. Measures to enhance flexibility and security should be both balanced and mutually reinforcingvel at which social security is compulsory, temporary agency work, fixed-term employment contracts, project work etc.) are associated not only with poorer social protection and smaller incomes but also with a lack of opportunities for further training, professional development and lifelong learning, and that the more flexible employment is, the more precarious it is. The concept of GOOD WORK puts a strong focus on promoting quality in work, improved social security and social inclusion, enhancing existing workers' rights and introducing new ones, promoting health and safety at work, better social risk management and the reconciliation of work and non-work life. Strong measures for enhancing security by phasing out precarious employment and those atypical contractual arrangements related to such insecure forms of employment should be launched by Member States, with a view to restricting and reducing atypical forms of employment, the misuse of which should be penalised. Member States shouldmust therefore introduce a combination of flexiblsecure and reliable employment contracts, active and integrative labour market policies, effective lifelong learning, policies to promote labour mobility, and adequatesupport the right to voluntarily chosen labour mobility, and effective, high quality social security systems to secure professional transitions accompanied by clear rights and responsibilities for the unemployed to actively seek workdequate benefits and tailor-made measures for finding quality employment or training and upgrading of their skills and competencies.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 2
Member States should step upuse social dialogue and tackle labour market segmentation with measures addressing temporary and precarious employment, underemployment and undeclared work. Professional mobility should be rewardeddiscrimination against women, migrants, older people and people with disabilities, underemployment and undeclared work. Undeclared employment should be fought through fiscal measures for low earners and for trades and crafts and through more intensive monitoring by labour inspectorate services and social insurance bodies. Professional mobility should be rewarded by measures under employment, social and fiscal legislation. The quality of jobswork and employment conditions shouldmust be addressed by fighting low-wages and by ensuring adequatepoverty-proof social security also for those on fixedwith precarious and other forms of atypical contracts and the self- employed. Member States should agree an EU target for minimum wages (whether statutory or collectively agreed at national, regional or sectoral level) to guarantee remuneration of at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average income and, further, lay down a timetable for achieving that target in all Member States. Employment services should bemust be effectively strengthened and open to all, including young people and in particular those threatened by unemployment and appropriate measures provided within the context of active, inclusive labour market policies, with personalised services targeting those furthest away from the labour market.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 3
In order to increase competitivenesspromote environmentally and socially sustainable development and raise participation levels, particularly for the low-skilled, and in line with economic policy guideline 2, Member States should reviewadapt tax and benefit systems and increase the capacity of public services to provide the necessary support. Member States should increase labour force participation through policies to promote active ageingthe concept of GOOD WORK, gender equality and equal pay for equal work or work of equal value, and labour market integration of young people, disabled, legal migrants and other vulnerable groups. In that respect a European Youth Guarantee securing the right of every young person in the EU to the offer of a suitable well-paid job in line with their qualifications and skills, an apprenticeship, additional training or combined work and training immediately upon facing unemployment is necessary. Work-life balance policies with the provision of affordable care and innovation in work organisation should be geared to a reduction of working time without loss of pay and thus raising employment rates, particularly among youth, older workers and women, in particular to retain highly- skilled women in scientific and technical fields. Member States should also remove barriers to labour market entry for newcomers, support self-employment and job creation in areas including green employment and care and promote social innovation. Furthermore, work-life balance policies should strengthen transition security based on good job protection by enhancing social rights and social protection to prevent income risks and to ensure the maintenance and acquisition of pension rights and health care coverage etc. during employment transitions, and also during leave periods (e.g. for caring for dependent persons, further training and education, sabbaticals etc.). Member States should promote the reconciliation of work and non-work-life also by a clear reduction of the average weekly working time as well as a clear lowering of the weekly statutory maximum working hours and a strict limitation of overtime hours. Member States should also remove barriers to labour market entry for newcomers, support self-employment and job creation in areas including green employment and high-valued, in particular, social services, and promote social innovation. Access to the labour market for young people and newcomers should be enabled by limiting effectively working life.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 4
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is of aiming to bring by 2020 to 75% the employment rate for women and men aged 20-64 including through the greater participation of youth, older workers - especially older women - and low skilled workers and the better integration of legal migrants.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 8 – title
Guideline 8: Developing a skilled workforce responding to labour market needs, promoting job quality andImproving the level of education and training and further training among employees and promoting lifelong learning
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 8 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an adequate supply of knowledge and skills to match current and future demand in the labour markea broad supply of knowledge and skills in order that workers, under the conditions of permanent processes of restructuring and change in all three sectors of the labour market, can obtain a permanent, full-time job, which ensures them a livelihood and enables social and cultural involvement. Quality initial education and attractive vocational training must be complemented with effective incentives for lifelong learning, second-chance opportunities, ensuring every adult at any time the chance to move one step up in their qualification, and by targeted migration and integration policies. Member States shouldmust develop systems for recognising acquired competencies, remove barriers to occupational and geographical mobility of workers, promote the acquisition of transversal competences and creativity, and focus their efforts particularly on supporting those with low skills, and increasing the employability of older workerscombat discrimination in connection with access to education and training and further training, while at the same time enhance the training, skills and experience of highly skilled workers, including researchers.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 8 – paragraph 2
In cooperation with the social partners and business, Member States should improve access to training, strengthen education and career guidance combined with systematic information on, and appropriate measures to promote, new job openings and opportunities, promotion of entrepreneurshipbusiness involvement in education and training and further training and enhanced anticipation of skill needs. Investment in human resourcepersonnel planning and development, up- skilling and participation in lifelong learning schemes should be promoted through joint financial contributions from governments, individuals and employers. To support young people and in particular those not in employment, education or training, Member States in cooperation with the social partners, should enact schemes to help recent graduatesyoung people with or without a school leaving qualification find initial employment or further education and training opportunities, including apprenticeships, and intervene rapidly when young people become unemployed. Regular monitoring of the performance of up-skilling and anticipation policies should help identify areas for improvement and increase the responsiveness of education and training systems to labour market needsmake education and training systems more geared towards growth fields of work of the future. EU funds should be fully mobilised by Member States to support these objectives.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 9 – paragraph 1
In order to ensure access to quality education and training for all and to improve educational outcomes, Member States should invest efficiently in education and training and further training systems notably to raise the skill level of the EU's workforce, allowing it to meetrespond to the rapidly changing needs of modern labour marketsworld of work. Action should cover all sectors (from early childhood education and schools through to higher education, vocational education and training, as well as adult training) taking also into account learning in informal and non-formal contexts. Reforms should aim to ensure the acquisition of the key competencies that every individual needs for success in a knowledge-based economy, notably in terms of employability, further learning, or ICT skills. Steps should be taken to ensure learning mobility of young people and teachers becomes the normis facilitated. Member States should improve the openness and relevance of education and training systems, particularly by implementing national qualification frameworks enabling flexibleopen learning pathways, including for those who are older, and by developing partnerships between the worlds of education/training and work. The teaching profession should be made more attractive. Higher education should become more open to non-traditional learners and participation in tertiary or equivalent education should be increased. With a view to reducing the number of young people not in employment, education, or training, Member States should take all necessary steps to prevent early school leaving. For people who, for various reasons, are unable to participate in these systems, social protection which goes further than preventing poverty should be guaranteed. For people who, because of illness and/or disability, are no longer able to practise their previous occupation, special vocational further training and/or retraining measures should be provided.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 9 – paragraph 2
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is to reduce the drop out rate to 10%, whilst increasing the share of the population aged 30-34 having completed tertiary or equivalent education to at least 40% in 2020.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 10 – paragraph 1
Member States’To achieve this goal, Member States should intensify efforts to reduceliminate poverty, including working poor conditions. Efforts should be aimed at promoting full participation in society and, of people’s own deciding, in politics, society, the arts, and the economy and extending employment opportunities, making full use of the European Social Fund. Efforts should also concentrate on ensuringmaintaining and bringing about both equal opportunities, including through and access to affordable, sustainable and high -quality services and public services (including online services, in line with guideline 4) and in particular health care, specifically as regards social welfare, employment, health, and neighbourhood services. Member States should put in place active and effective anti-discrimination measures. Equally, to fight social exclusion, empower people and promote labour market participation, social protection systems, lifelong learning and active inclusion policies should be enhanced to create opportunities at different stages of people’s lives and shield them from the risk of exclusion. Social security and pension systems must be modernised to ensure that they can be fully deployed to ensure adequate income supportincome above the poverty threshold and access to health care – thus providing social cohesion – whilst at the same time remaining financially sustainable. Benefit systems should focus on ensuring income security during transitions and reducing poverty, in particular among groups most at risk from social exclusion, such as one-parent families, minorities, people with disabilities, children and young people, elderly women and men, legal migrants and the homeless. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and social innovation in support ofminorities, people with disabilities, children and young people, elderly women and men, migrants and the homeless. Member States should agree on an EU- wide commitment to ending street homelessness by 2015 and seek to frame integrated policy measures offering access to affordable decent housing with the necessary energy provision for all. The Council should agree on an EU target for minimum income systems and contribution-based income substitute benefit systems, whereby the income support provided should be not less than 60% of the national median equivalised income, and, in addition, on a compliance schedule. With a view to eliminating child poverty in the EU, Member States should undertake to achieve a 50% reduction by 2012, on the understanding that such a cut should not be measured by economic indicators alone, and should make the necessary provision to attain that goal. The fact that a child, in particular for one-parent families, should constitute a poverty risk is incompatible with the aims of the EU. The parents concerned should be shielded from that risk by means of free childcare, social support, and tailor- made support from employment agencies. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and social innovations designed to address the different social risks which arise during people’s lifetime, especially where the most vulnerable are concerned.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2010/0115(NLE)


Annex – Guideline 10 – paragraph 2
The EU headline target, on the basis of which Member States will set their national targets, is to reduce by 25% the number ofeliminate poverty and, as a first step, reduce by 50 % by 2015 the number of people in the Europeans Union living below the national poverty lines, lifting over 20 million people out of poverty.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of public services – publicly owned and managed, with democratic involvement of users of such services – in areas essential to people's welfare, such as health, education, justice, water, housing, transport, childcare and care for the elderly;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of conducting, as a matter of urgency, an assessment of the social consequences and the impact on people’s lives of liberalisation measures in sectors that are essential to social progress (transport, energy, water, postal services, telecommunications, etc.) and urges the Commission to prevent any further liberalisation measures from being taken until this assessment has been submitted;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights the need to review liberalisation policies in order to promote a policy of social progress ensuring universal access to high-quality public services, with special consideration for disadvantaged groups, such as single mothers, women, elderly people, children, migrants and those with any kind of disability;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers that steps must be taken to address the current legal uncertainty as regards SSGI, making it clear that public goods, public services, services of general interest and the not-for-profit sector are not subject to rules on competition, public aid, public contracts and the internal market, but form a sector geared solely towards the public interest and that is organised in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity within the exclusive competence of the Member States and their respective regional and local authorities, with a view to ensuring its proper functioning;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Points out that the economic and financial crisis and the austerity policies imposed by Member States should not encourage disinvestment in SSGIs, but that, on the contrary, given their importance and absolute necessity, such services need to be consolidated in order to meet people’s needs;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to respect the diversity of the methods of organising and managing SSGIs, of their resources and of the methods of funding these services; calls on the Member States to reverse ‘reforms’ which have institutionalised market-based models of welfare provision, with competition and tendering obligations, and to cease promoting public-private partnerships or externalising social services to the private sector as these are misleading strategies for ‘modernising’ social services; considers that taking care to promote the general interest and ensure the provision of efficient and high-quality services by both the public sector and the not-for-profit 'third’ sector or the social economy is the most appropriate strategy for ensuring high-quality, integrated and inclusive social services;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Believes that local authorities and social partners must be involved in an ongoing bottom-up process of overhauling procurement rules to avoid discrepancies between the rules and modes of organisation on the ground;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Emphasises that decent, stable working conditions safeguarded by wages set under collective agreements or payment of the minimum wage and quality training are essential for the delivery of quality social services;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that the VQF principles and payment in accordance with the customary wages set under collective agreements in the area concerned should be used to help define obligatory quality criteria for application to revised public procurement rules;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
- having regard to the conclusions of the Informal Meeting of Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs in Berlin, 18–20 January 2007, on “good work”,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Na. Whereas recent empirical studies on EU labour markets found out that employment flexibility has the strongest negative effect on employability, as flexible employment contracts (marginal part-time employment, temporary and agency work, fixed-term employment, project-based work etc.) are not only linked with lower levels of social protection and income but also with a lack of opportunities for training, professional development and lifelong learning, and that the more flexible employment is, the more it is precarious,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N b (new)
Nb. Whereas flexicurity strategies implemented within the EU did not deliver on its promises to improve also security; whereas empirical studies on flexicurity reforms found out that relatively few flexibly employed gained little from significant losses in protection of the much more numerous normally employed, so that the general average trend of flexicurity reforms is essentially negative for the majority of employees,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N c (new)
Nc. Whereas the Informal Meeting of EU Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs in Berlin on 19 January 2007 concluded that 'Europe needs more and joint efforts to promote GOOD WORK. GOOD WORK means employee rights and participation, fair wages, protection of safety and health at work as well as a family friendly work organisation. Good and fair working conditions as well as an appropriate social protection are indispensable for the acceptance of the European Union by its citizens,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N d (new)
Nd. Whereas the concept of GOOD WORK should provide the fundamental guidance for the next phase of the European Employment Strategy,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls upon the Union and the Member States to eradicatefight illicit employment and believes that implementation of flexicurity strategiin particular through fiscal measures for low earners and craft services can help in fighting illicit employment and in making ‘very atypical’ fd through more intensive monitoring by factory inspectorms of work less precariouand social insurance institutions;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need to create high-quality jobs geared towards sustainable, full-time employment, including green jobs, and to ensure social cohesion; considers, therefore, that people are more likely to accept the efforts required of them if those efforts are perceived to be fair and to facilitate employment and social integration;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Highlights that not all forms of atypical employment necessarily lead to unstable, insecure, casual labour with lower levels of social security protection, lower wages and lower access to further training and lifelong learning; points out, however, that such precarious forms of employment are in the big majority of cases linked to atypical contractual arrangements;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Points out that high unemployment and labour market segmentation need to be overcome by giving all workers equal rights and investing in job creation, skills and lifelong learning; calls on the Member States, therefore, to phase out all forms of precarious employment;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Points out that phasing out precarious employment needs a strong commitment from Member States to provide adequate 'stepping stones' through their labour market policies for the transition from precarious employment to regular permanent employment with enhanced workers' rights and social protection;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Highlights that the European Union committed itself to the goal of reconciliation of work life and private life; criticises, however, that the Commission and the Member States have lacked any meaningful and effective action to put this commitment into practice;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Points out that a better reconciliation of work life and private life can be best achieved by renewing the model of standard employment: permanent contracts with shorter full-time employment as the general norm, and also establishing norms for part-time employment, so that only substantiated and socially protected part-time work (15 - 25 hours weekly) will be offered to those who wish to work part-time, stresses the need to put full-time and part-time employment on an equal footing as far as hourly wages, entitlements to education and life-long learning, career opportunities and social protection are concerned;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that flexicurity should be defined as combining flexibility and security on the labour market, so as to help increase both productivity and the quality of jobs by guaranteeing security, while allowing firms the flexibility needed to create jobs in response to the changing needs of the market; is of the opinion that flexibility and security requirements are not contradictory and are mutually reinforcing; is also of the opinion that those requirements have not been adequately reflected in Europe’s employment growth results in recent years;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that, especially in the context of the present economic situation, implementing flexicurity is even more necessary, recalls that application of flexibility principles requires ambitious structural reforms based on a solid consensus and more extensive social security;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Regrets the Council's and the Commission's narrow approach towards flexicurity; calls on the Commission and the Council to commit themselves to the GOOD WORK agenda and to enshrine it into the next generation of the Integrated Guidelines and the European Employment Strategy: promoting job and employment security for workers, a rights based approach to active labour market policies and lifelong learning, comprehensive health and safety at work, universal and equal social and workers' rights for everyone, a work/life balance and reconciliation of work and non-work life, improving the quality of employment and well being at work;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls upon the nationalCommission, the national governments and the social partners to overcome reservations against ‘outsiders’ (employees with atypical or ‘very atypical’ contracts) and to balance their rights and social-protection requirements with those of ‘insiders’;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Believes that collective bargaining hasand reductions in working hours with wage compensation arrangements under social security schemes, among other things, have proven to be an effective instrument for maintaining employment and that it allows companies to find flexible solutions to deal with the economic downturn;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Where appropriate, tThe Authority should consultall allow interested parties on technical standards, guidelines and recommendationsto be consulted on all work undertaken by the Authority and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to comment on proposed measures. For reasons of efficiency, a Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group should be established for that purpose, representing in balanced proportions CommunityEU financial market participants (including as appropriate institutional investors and other financial institutions which themselves use financial services), their employees, and consumers and other retail users of financial services, including SMEs. The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group should actively work as an interface with other user groups in the financial services area established by the Commission or CommunityUnion legislation.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 207 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting protect investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vi) preventing regulatory arbitrage. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the CommunityUnion law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting protect investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vi) developing common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on the financial position of institutions and on customer protection, with the aim to contributing to a level playing field. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the CommunityUnion law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 388 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) encourage the emergence of best practices, including an effective and constructive dialogue between national authorities and relevant stakeholders including consumers and unions representing employees in the sector as constituents of a common supervisory culture;
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 389 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) ensure that authorities take account of information from employees on companies’ business practices as regards remuneration structures, incentives, skills and working conditions;
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 392 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) contribute to developing high quality and uniform supervisory standards, including reporting and accounting standards;
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 404 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
In particular, the Authority shall, in cooperation with the ESRB, initiate and coordinate CommunityUnion -wide assessments of the resilience of key financial market participants to adverse market developments, and of threats arising from financial products’ characteristics and distribution processes. To that end, it shall develop the following, for application by the competent authorities:
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 406 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on an institution’s financial position and on customer protection;
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 434 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1
2. The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group shall be composed of 30 members, representing in balanced proportions CommunityEU financial market participants, their employees as well as consumers, investors and users of financial services. No stakeholders in the group shall have a stronger position than others.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 441 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 2
The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group shall meet at least twicefour times a year.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 452 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 - subparagraph 3 a (new)
Adequate financial compensation shall be established for members of the stakeholder group, which represent non- profit organisations.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 459 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group may submit opinions and advice to the Authority on any issue related to the tasks of the Authority specified in Articles 7 and 8to 19.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 464 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The stakeholder group shall decide on the issues relevant for consultation as well as on the agenda for the meetings.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 472 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall ensure that no decision adopted under Articles 10 or 11 impinges in any wadirectly on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 486 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In its notification, the Member State shall justify why and clearly demonstrate howprovide an impact assessment on how much the decision impinges on its fiscal responsibilities.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 184 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Close cooperation between the Authority and the European Systemic Risk Board is essential to give full effectiveness to the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board and the follow-up to its warnings and recommendations. The Authority and the European Systemic Risk Board should share any relevant information with the European Systemic Risk Board. Data related to individual undertakings should be provided only upon reasoned request. Upon receipt of warnings or recommendations addressed by the European Systemic Risk Board to the Authority or a national supervisory authority, the Authority should ensure follow-up.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Where appropriate, tThe Authority should consultallow interested parties on technical standards, guidelines and recommendationsto be consulted on all work undertaken by the Authority and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to comment on proposed measures. For reasons of efficiency, an Insurance, Reinsurance and Occupational Pension Funds Stakeholder Group should be established for that purpose, representing in balanced proportions CommunityUnion insurance and reinsurance firms as well as occupational pension funds (including as appropriate institutional investors and other financial institutions which themselves use financial services), their employees and consumers and other retail users of the insurance, reinsurance and occupational pension services, including SMEs. The Insurance, Reinsurance and Occupational Pension Funds Stakeholder Group should actively work as an interface with other user groups in the financial services area established by the Commission or CommunityUnion legislation.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 202 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting policyholders and other beneficiariedepositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vi) preventing regulatory arbitrage. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the CommunityUnion law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting policyholders and other beneficiariedepositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vi) developing common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on the financial position of institutions and on customer protection, with the aim to contributing to a level playing field. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the CommunityUnion law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 373 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) encourage the emergence of best practices, including an effective and constructive dialogue between national authorities and relevant stakeholders including consumers and unions representing employees in the sector as constituents of a common supervisory culture;
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 374 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) ensure that authorities take account of information from employees on companies’ business practices as regards remuneration structures, incentives, skills and working conditions;
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 375 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) contribute to developing high quality and uniform supervisory standards, including reporting and accounting standards;
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 389 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In particular, the Authority shall, in cooperation with the ESRB, initiate and coordinate Community-wide assessments of the resilience of financial institutions to adverse market developments, and of threats arising from financial products’ characteristics and distribution processes. To that end, it shall develop the following, for application by the national supervisorycompetent authoritiesy:
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 390 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on an institution’s financial position and on customer protection;
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 419 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The Insurance, Reinsurance and Occupational Pension Funds Stakeholder Group shall be composed of 30 members, representing in balanced proportions CommunityEU insurance and reinsurance firms as well as occupational pension funds, their employeerade unions and social organisations as well as consumers and users of the insurance, reinsurance and occupational pension service services. No stakeholders in the group shall have a stronger position than others. At least five of the members shall be independent scientists.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 420 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Insurance, Reinsurance and Occupational Pension Funds Stakeholder Group shall meet at least twicefour times a year.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 432 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
3a. Adequate financial compensation shall be established for members of the stakeholder group, which represent non- profit organisations.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 444 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Insurance, Reinsurance and Occupational Pension FundsBanking Stakeholder Group may submit opinions and advice to the Authority on any issue related to all the tasks of the Authority specified infrom Articles 7 and 8to 19.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 446 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The stakeholder group shall decide on the issues relevant for consultation as well as on the agenda for the meetings.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 456 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall ensure that no decision adopted under Articles 10 or 11 impinges in any wadirectly on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 461 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In its notification, the Member State shall justify why and clearly demonstrate howprovide an impact assessment on how much the decision impinges on its fiscal responsibilities.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 517 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. TAn annual report on the Authority's activities shall be submitted to the European Parliament may also, which may call upon the Chairperson at any time to submit a report on the performance of his duties.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 251 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Where appropriate, tThe Authority should consultall allow interested parties on technical standards, guidelines and recommendationso be consulted on all work undertaken by the Authority and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to comment on proposed measures. For reasons of efficiency, a Banking Stakeholder Group should be established for that purpose, representing in balanced proportions Community credit and investment institutions (including as appropriate institutional investors and other financial institutions which themselves use financial services), their employees, and consumers and other retail users of banking services, including SMEs. The Banking Stakeholder Group should actively work as an interface with other user groups in the financial services area established by the Commission or Community legislation.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 291 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting depositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vi) preventing regulatory arbitrage. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the Community law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 292 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting depositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, (vii) developing common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on the financial position of institutions and on customer protection, with the aim to contributing to a level playing field. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the Community law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 518 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) encourage the emergence of best practices, including an effective and constructive dialogue between national authorities and relevant stakeholders including consumers and unions representing employees in the sector as constituents of a common supervisory culture.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 519 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) ensure that authorities take account of information from employees on companies’ business practices as regards remuneration structures, incentives, skills and working conditions.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 523 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) contribute to developing high quality and uniform supervisory standards, including reporting and accounting standards;
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 539 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
In particular, the Authority shall, in cooperation with the ESRB, initiate and coordinate Community-wide assessments of the resilience of financial institutions to adverse market developments, and of threats arising from financial products’ characteristics and distribution processes. To that end, it shall develop the following, for application by the competent authorities:
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 540 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) common methodologies for assessing the effect of product characteristics and distribution processes on an institution’s financial position and on customer protection;
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 592 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The Banking Stakeholder Group shall be composed of 30 members, representing in balanced proportions Community credit and investment institutions, their employees as well as consumers and users of banking services. No stakeholders in the group shall have a stronger position than others.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 596 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Banking Stakeholder Group shall meet at least twicefour times a year.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 600 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Adequate financial compensation shall be established for members of the stakeholder group, which represent non- profit organisations.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 608 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Banking Stakeholder Group may submit opinions and advice to the Authority on any issue related to the tasks of the Authority specified in Articles 7 and 8to 19.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 611 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The stakeholder group shall decide on the issues relevant for consultation as well as on the agenda for the meetings.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 615 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall ensure that no decision adopted under Articles 10 or 11 impinges in any wadirectly on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 626 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In its notification, the Member State shall justify why and clearly demonstrate howprovide an impact assessment on how much the decision impinges on its fiscal responsibilities.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 23 #

2009/0141(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
(2) The Head of the Secretariat shall be appointed by the ECB, ion consultation witha proposal by the General Board of the ESRB.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #

2009/0141(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. This collection of information on behalf of the ESRB may include European Economic Area, Union, euro area and Member State aggregated and individual data. The Secretariat shall first take into account the existing statistics produced, disseminated and developed by both the European Statistical System and the ESRB.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 119 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The ESRB shall be responsible for the macro-prudential oversight of the financial system within the Community in order to prevent or mitigate systemic risks within the financial system, so as to avoid episodes of widespread financial distress, contribute to a smooth functioning of the Iinternal Mmarket and ensure a sustainable contribution of the financial sector to economic growth, thereby taking account of Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 150 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) one representative of the European Trade Union Confederation, Business Europe and the European Consumers’ Organisation, respectively.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 181 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – title
Advisory TechnicalScientific Committee
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 183 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Advisory TechnicalScientific Committee shall be composed of the following:
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) one representative per Member State of the competent national of the European Trade Union Confederation, Business Europe and the European Consupmervisory authorits’ Organisation, respectively;
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 197 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
In performing its tasks, the ESRB shall seek, where appropriate, the advice of relevant private sectorstakeholders, including, at least, the stakeholders in the ESA stakeholder groups.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 243 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
(2) The ESRB shall also examine specific issues at the invitation of the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
The Commission communication of 24 May 2006 entitled 'Promoting decent work for all - The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world' (COM(2006)0249) set out the importance of decent work for all, and the Parliament's resolution of 23 May 2007 confirmed the same,
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) The actions financed by the Facility should be accompanied by mentoring, training, coaching and other support programmes in order to maximise the chances of creating viable and sustainable micro-enterprises. Such support should be delivered in a targeted way to assist with the set-up of the micro-enterprises. In addition, support and advice should be available until the micro-enterprise becomes self-sustaining.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) mentoring, training, coaching and other support programmes which will maximise the chances of creating viable and sustainable micro-enterprises. Such support should be delivered in a targeted way to assist with the set-up of the micro- enterprise, such support to be available in advance of the set-up and until the micro- enterprise becomes self-sustaining.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Particular attention shall be paid to stimulating and strengthening the social economy.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Access to funding under this facility is purely voluntary and under no circumstances should persons be compelled to use the facility under threat of withdrawal or reduction of social security payments.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive– amending act
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) In the absence of horizontal community legislation, the rights of third-country nationals vary, depending on the Member State in which they work and on their nationality. They do not have the same rights as nationals of the Member State, or other EU citizens. With a view to pursue a further development of a coherent immigration policy, to lower the rights gap between EU citizens and third-country nationals legally working and complementing the existing immigration acquis a set of rights should be laid down in particular in the form of specifying the policy fields where equal treatment with own nationals is provided for third-country workers legally admitted in a Member States but not yet long term residents. Such provisions are intended to establish a level playing field within the EU, to recognize that such third-country nationals legally working in a Member States contributeion to the European economy through their work and tax payments and to serve as safeguard to reducesociety and to fight against unfair competition between own nationals and third-country nationals resulting from possible exploitation of the latter.
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
(b) covered by Directive 96/71/EC as long as they are posdeleted;
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) In the absence of horizontal community legislation, the rights of third-country nationals vary, depending on the Member State in which they work and on their nationality. They do not have the same rights as nationals of the Member State, or other EU citizens. With a view to pursue a further development of a coherent immigration policy, to lower the rights gap between EU citizens and third-country nationals legally working and complementing the existing immigration acquis a set of rights should be laid down in particular in the form of specifying the policy fields where equal treatment with own nationals is provided for third-country workers legally admitted in a Member States but not yet long term residents. Such provisions are intended to establish a level playing field within the EU, to recognize that such third-country nationals legally working in a Member States contributeion to the European economy through their work and tax payments and to serve as a safeguard to reducesociety and to fight against unfair competition between own nationals and third-country nationals resulting from possible exploitation of the latter.
2010/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) working conditions, including pay, leave, working time and dismissal as well as health and safety at the workplace, taking into account general collective agreements in force;
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) working conditions, including pay, leave, working time and dismissal as well as health and safety at the workplace, taking into account general collective agreements in force;
2010/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point (a)
(a) by requiring proof of appropriate language proficiency for access to education and training. Access to university may be subject to the fulfilment of specific educational prerequisites;deleted
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(h) in respect to public housing to cases where the third-country national has been staying or who has the right to stay in its territory for at least three years;deleted
2010/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
(b) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(c) in respect to study grants;deleted
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(a), (b) and (g) to those third-country workers who are in employment;deleted
2010/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point (c)
(c) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(h) in respect to public housing to cases where the third-country national has been staying or who has the right to stay in its territory for at least three years;deleted
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(e) to third-country workers who are in employment except for unemployment benefits.deleted
2010/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point (d)
(d) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(a), (b) and (g) to those third-country workers who are in employment;deleted
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point (e)
(e) by restricting the rights conferred under paragraphs 1(e) to third-country workers who are in employment except for unemployment benefits.deleted
2011/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In an increasingly global labour market, the EU should enhance its appeal to attract third-country workers. This should be facilitated by administrative simplification and by facilitating access to relevant information. PTo the extent that applications to reside and work in the territory of a Member State are concomitant, provisions for a single application procedure leading to one combined title encompassing both residence and work permit within one administrative act should contribute to simplifying and harmonizsing the diverging rules currently applicable in Member States. Such procedural simplification has already been introduced by the majority of Member States and has made for a more efficient procedure both for the migrants and for their employers, and allowed easier controls of the lawfulness of their residence and employment.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 68 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The conditions and criteria on the basis of which an application for a single permit can be rejected is laid down in national law including the obligation to respect the principle of Community preference as expressed in particular in the relevant provisions of the Acts of Accession of 16 April 2003 and 25 April 2005should be transparent, objective, verifiable and laid down in national law.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 71 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The single permit should take the harmonizsed format of the residence permit in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002, laying down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals, enabling the Member States to enter further information, in particular as to whether or not the person is permitted to work. Member States should indicate – also for the purpose of better control of migration – not only in the single permit but also in all the issued residence permits the information relating to the permission to work irrespective of the type of the permit or the residence title on the basis of which the third country national has been admitted to the territory of a Member State and has been given access to the labour market of that Member State.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 72 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Third-country nationals who have been admitted to the territory of a Member State for a period not exceeding 6 months in any twelve-month period to work on a seasonal basis should not be covered by the Directive given their temporary status.deleted
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 74 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Beneficiaries of temporary protection should be subject to this Directive as regards the common set of rights, as they are authorised to work legally within the territory of a Member State.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 77 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognizsed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and has to be implemented accordingly. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring respect of the freedom of assembly and association, the right to education, the freedom to choose an occupation and the right to engage in work, the principle of non-discrimination, the right to fair and just working conditions, the right to social security and social assistance as well as the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial as guaranteed in the Charter.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 79 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) This Directive should be implemented without prejudice to more favourable provisions contained in EU legislation and international instruments. In particular, this Directive respects the rights and principles laid down in the European Social Charter of 1961 and in the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families of 1990.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 80 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Member States should give effect to the provisions of this Directive without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic characteristics, language, religion or beliefs, political or other opinions, membership of a national minority, fortune, birth, disabilities, age or sexual orientation in particular in accordance with Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin and Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, and in accordance with future legislation in this field, such as that to be introduced under the proposal for a Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation (COM(2008)0426).
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to third-country workers legally residing in a Member State, irrespective of the grounds on which they were initially admitted to the territory of that Member State.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 85 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) who have been admitted to the territory of a Member State for a period not exceeding six months in any 12 month period to work on a seasonal basis;deleted
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 90 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) whose expulsion has been suspended for reasons of fact or law.deleted
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 94 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. AnTo the extent that applications to reside and work in the territory of a Member State are concomitant, they shall be submitted in a single application procedure.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 95 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. All third-country nationals shall have the right to submit an application to reside and work in the territory of a Member State. In addition, employers or recognised intermediaries shall also be permitted to submit an application in the name of a third-country national.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 96 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall examine the application and adopt a decision to grant, to modify or to renew the single permit if the applicant fulfils the requirements specified in national law. To the extent that applications to reside and work in the territory of a Member State are concomitant, the decision granting, modifying or renewing the single permit shall constitute one combined title encompassing both residence and work permit within one administrative act.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 97 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The time limit referred to in the first subparagraph may be extended by up to six months in exceptional circumstances, linked to the complexity of the examination of the application.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 99 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Where a third-country national already resides in a Member State, that Member State shall allow the third-country national concerned to remain legally on its territory until the single permit has been granted or denied and all possible remedies have been exhausted.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 100 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. If the information or the documents supporting the application is inadequate, the designated authority shall notify the applicant of the additional information that is requiredare incomplete according to publicly specified criteria, the competent authority shall notify the applicant of the additional information or documents that are required. If applicable, it shall also inform the applicant as to where to get the information or the documents. The period referred to in paragraph 2 shall be suspended until the authorities have received the additional information required.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 104 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Reasons shall be given in the written notification for a decision rejecting the application, not granting, not modifying or not renewing, suspending or withdrawing the single permit on the basis of criteria specified in national or community lawUnion law; such reasons shall be objective, verifiable and transparent.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 106 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Any decision rejecting the application, not granting, modifying or renewing, suspending or withdrawing a single permit shall be open to challenge before the courts of the Member State concerned. The written notification shall specify the possible redress procedures availableIn such cases, third-country nationals shall enjoy the same procedural guarantees as are provided for citizens of the Member State concerned, including, where applicable, any free legal aid. The written notification shall specify the court or the competent administrative authority with which the person concerned may lodge an appeal and the time-limit for taking actionsuch appeal.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 109 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9
Member States shall take the necessary measures to inform the third-country national and the future employer automatically, immediately and comprehensively on all the documentary evidence they need in order to complete the application.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 110 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10
Member States may not request applicants to pay fees for handling applications in accordance with this Directive. The level of fees must be proportionate and may be based on the principle of the service actually provided.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 113 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – point b a (new)
(ba) stay in any other Member State for short periods not exceeding three months;
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 116 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
At the end of the period of validity of the single permit, Member States may on application grant a residence permit of a maximum duration of six months for the purpose of seeking employment. During this period they shall enjoy the same assistance in finding employment as provided for citizens of that Member State.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 118 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Temporary unemployment 1. Unemployment in itself shall not constitute a reason for revoking a permit, unless the period of unemployment exceeds six consecutive months. 2. During this period, third-country nationals shall be allowed to seek and take up employment, enjoying the same assistance in finding an employment as provided for citizens of that Member State.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 120 #

2007/0229(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Periodically, and for the first time no later than threewo years after the date specified in Article 16, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive in the Member States and shall propose any amendments deemed necessary.
2010/03/24
Committee: LIBE