BETA

Activities of Anna CAVAZZINI

Plenary speeches (78)

Amazon forest fires (debate)
2019/09/17
The danger of violent right-wing extremism (in the light of the recent events in Halle, Germany) (debate)
2019/10/21
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
2019/10/21
Situation in Bolivia (debate)
2019/11/13
Crisis of the WTO Appellate Body (debate)
2019/11/26
Compatibility between the current EU - Mercosur Free Trade Agreement and the Commission's proposal for a European Green Deal (topical debate)
2019/12/18
Devastating Bushfires in Australia and other extreme weather events as a consequence of Climate Change (debate)
2020/01/13
Rights of indigenous peoples (debate)
2020/01/29
Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement - Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement (Resolution) - EU-Viet Nam Investment Protection Agreement - EU-Viet Nam Investment Protection Agreement (Resolution) (debate)
2020/02/11
Dossiers: 2018/0356(NLE)
Vaccines and therapeutics in the context of Covid-19 (debate)
2020/05/14
Land grabbing and deforestation in the Amazonas (debate)
2020/06/19
Covid-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification and the consequences on Schengen and the single market (debate)
2020/09/15
Dossiers: 2020/2780(RSP)
Aligning the Energy Charta Treaty with the European Green Deal (debate)
2020/10/22
Towards a more sustainable single market for business and consumers (debate)
2020/11/23
Dossiers: 2020/2021(INI)
Towards a New Consumer Agenda beyond 2020 (debate)
2020/11/23
EU Trade Policy Review (debate)
2020/11/24
Dossiers: 2020/2761(RSP)
Preparation of an EU Strategy on COVID-19 vaccination, including its external dimension (debate)
2020/12/16
Future Relations between the EU and the UK (continuation of debate)
2020/12/18
Strengthening the single market: the future of free movement of services (debate)
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2020/2020(INI)
New Circular Economy Action Plan (debate)
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2020/2077(INI)
The state of play of the EU’s COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy (debate)
2021/02/10
Corporate due diligence and corporate accountability (debate)
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2020/2129(INL)
Evaluation of the Geo-blocking Regulation (debate)
2021/03/11
Dossiers: 2021/2546(RSP)
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The outcome of EU-UK negotiations (debate)
2021/04/27
Dossiers: 2020/0382(NLE)
COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America
2021/04/29
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Meeting the Global COVID-19 challenge: effects of waiver of the WTO TRIPS agreement on COVID-19 vaccines, treatment, equipment and increasing production and manufacturing capacity in developing countries (debate)
2021/05/19
Establishing the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment (debate)
2021/06/07
State of the Union (debate)
2021/09/15
The outcome of the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) (debate)
2021/11/11
The EU's role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic: how to vaccinate the world (topical debate)
2021/11/24
Digital Markets Act (debate)
2021/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/0374(COD)
Implementation of the Kimberley Process Certification scheme (debate)
2021/12/14
Dossiers: 2021/2885(RSP)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 16-17 December 2021 - The EU's response to the global resurgence of Covid-19 and the new emerging Covid variants (debate)
2021/12/15
Digital Services Act (continuation of debate)
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2020/0361(COD)
Second voting session
2022/01/20
EU-Africa relations (debate)
2022/02/15
Batteries and waste batteries (debate)
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2020/0353(COD)
The need for an ambitious EU Strategy for sustainable textiles (debate)
2022/03/10
Update from the Commission and Council on the state of play of the Energy Charter Treaty modernisation exercise (debate)
2022/03/24
Dossiers: 2022/2510(RSP)
Right to repair (debate)
2022/04/07
Dossiers: 2022/2515(RSP)
International procurement instrument (debate)
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2012/0060(COD)
A new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labour (debate)
2022/06/09
Dossiers: 2022/2611(RSP)
Future of EU international investment policy (short presentation)
2022/06/22
Dossiers: 2021/2176(INI)
The situation of indigenous and environmental defenders in Brazil, including the killing of Dom Phillips and Bruno Pereira
2022/07/06
Deforestation Regulation (debate)
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2021/0366(COD)
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (debate)
2022/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/0291(COD)
Outcome of the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty (debate)
2022/11/09
Situation of human rights in the context of the FIFA world cup in Qatar (debate)
2022/11/21
Tackle the cost of living crisis: increase pay, tax profits, stop speculation (topical debate)
2022/12/14
Formal sitting – Ceremony on the 30th Anniversary of the Single Market
2023/01/16
30th Anniversary of the Single Market (debate)
2023/01/16
The storming of the Brazilian democratic institutions
2023/01/18
Dossiers: 2023/2505(RSP)
A Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net-Zero Age (debate)
2023/02/15
Implementation report on the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU - The Windsor Framework (debate)
2023/03/14
Dossiers: 2020/2202(INI)
Conclusions of the Special European Council meeting of 9 February and preparation of the European Council meeting of 23-24 March 2023 (debate)
2023/03/15
General Product Safety Regulation (debate)
2023/03/29
Dossiers: 2021/0170(COD)
Deforestation Regulation (debate)
2023/04/17
Dossiers: 2021/0366(COD)
Empowering consumers for the green transition (debate)
2023/05/09
Dossiers: 2022/0092(COD)
Marking the World Day against Child Labour (debate)
2023/06/12
Batteries and waste batteries (debate)
2023/06/13
Dossiers: 2020/0353(COD)
Ecodesign Regulation (debate)
2023/07/11
Dossiers: 2022/0095(COD)
Single market emergency instrument (debate)
2023/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/0278(COD)
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (debate)
2023/09/13
Dossiers: 2023/0079(COD)
Energy Charter Treaty: next steps (debate)
2023/10/04
Energy Charter Treaty: next steps (debate)
2023/10/04
Need to complete new trade agreements for sustainable growth, competitiveness and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)
2023/10/04
Common rules promoting the repair of goods
2023/11/20
Dossiers: 2023/0083(COD)
EU/New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (debate)
2023/11/21
Dossiers: 2023/0038(NLE)
Empowering consumers for the green transition (debate)
2024/01/16
Dossiers: 2022/0092(COD)
State of EU solar industry in light of unfair competition (debate)
2024/02/05
Regaining our competitive edge - a prosperous EU in a fragmented global economy (topical debate)
2024/02/28
EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement - EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (Resolution) - Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Chile (joint debate - EU-Chile agreements)
2024/02/29
Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive) (debate)
2024/03/11
State of play of the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (debate)
2024/03/12
Common rules promoting the repair of goods (debate)
2024/04/22
Prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market (debate)
2024/04/22
Withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty (debate)
2024/04/23
Dossiers: 2023/0273(NLE)
Withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty (debate)
2024/04/23
Dossiers: 2023/0273(NLE)

Reports (3)

REPORT on the future of EU international investment policy
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2021/2176(INI)
Documents: PDF(225 KB) DOC(87 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013, Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain reporting requirements
2024/01/29
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2023/0370(COD)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(47 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI - President', 'mepid': None}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty
2024/04/11
Committee: INTAITRE
Dossiers: 2023/0273(NLE)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(54 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Marc BOTENGA', 'mepid': 187917}, {'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]

Shadow reports (21)

REPORT on strengthening the single market: the future of free movement of services
2020/12/09
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2020(INI)
Documents: PDF(237 KB) DOC(92 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Morten LØKKEGAARD', 'mepid': 96709}]
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Customs programme for cooperation in the field of customs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2013
2021/03/08
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2018/0232(COD)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(49 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria GRAPINI', 'mepid': 124785}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Union and Cuba relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2020/0233(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(50 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Gabriel MATO', 'mepid': 96936}]
RECOMMENDATION on the proposal for a Council decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the Union and the Argentine Republic relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2021/0054(NLE)
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(75 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jordi CAÑAS', 'mepid': 126644}]
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, the instrument for financial support for customs control equipment
2021/06/07
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2018/0258(COD)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(49 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jiří POSPÍŠIL', 'mepid': None}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Union Single Window Environment for Customs and amending Regulation (EU) No 952/2013
2021/10/11
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/0306(COD)
Documents: PDF(356 KB) DOC(156 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Ivan ŠTEFANEC', 'mepid': 124929}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Commonwealth of Australia pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union
2021/11/05
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2021/0029(NLE)
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(114 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Daniel CASPARY', 'mepid': 28219}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/216 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards Union tariff rate quota for high quality beef from Paraguay
2021/12/01
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2021/0146(COD)
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(75 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jordi CAÑAS', 'mepid': 126644}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/53/EU on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment
2022/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0291(COD)
Documents: PDF(281 KB) DOC(143 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Alex AGIUS SALIBA', 'mepid': 197403}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
2023/05/02
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2022/0377(NLE)
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(85 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jordi CAÑAS', 'mepid': 126644}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
2023/06/29
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2023/0036(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(49 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2019/1009 and (EU) No 305/2011 as regards emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to a Single Market emergency
2023/07/24
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0279(COD)
Documents: PDF(370 KB) DOC(160 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andreas SCHWAB', 'mepid': 28223}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98
2023/07/25
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0278(COD)
Documents: PDF(689 KB) DOC(332 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andreas SCHWAB', 'mepid': 28223}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU and 2014/68/EU as regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to a Single Market emergency
2023/07/25
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/0280(COD)
Documents: PDF(505 KB) DOC(233 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andreas SCHWAB', 'mepid': 28223}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market
2023/10/26
Committee: IMCOINTA
Dossiers: 2022/0269(COD)
Documents: PDF(780 KB) DOC(346 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES', 'mepid': 197635}, {'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules promoting the repair of goods and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, Directives (EU) 2019/771 and (EU) 2020/1828
2023/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2023/0083(COD)
Documents: PDF(373 KB) DOC(165 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'René REPASI', 'mepid': 229839}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Chile
2024/01/29
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2023/0259(NLE)
Documents: PDF(185 KB) DOC(60 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Advanced Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part
2024/01/29
Committee: AFETINTA
Dossiers: 2023/0260(NLE)
Documents: PDF(181 KB) DOC(62 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}, {'name': 'María Soraya RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS', 'mepid': 4344}]
INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Advanced Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part
2024/01/30
Committee: AFETINTA
Dossiers: 2023/0260R(NLE)
Documents: PDF(226 KB) DOC(88 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}, {'name': 'María Soraya RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS', 'mepid': 4344}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013
2024/02/28
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2023/0156(COD)
Documents: PDF(834 KB) DOC(383 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Deirdre CLUNE', 'mepid': 124988}]
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Argentine Republic amending the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Argentine Republic pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
2024/03/11
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2023/0303(NLE)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(51 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Jordi CAÑAS', 'mepid': 126644}]

Opinions (4)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information
2020/02/19
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2019/0101(COD)
Documents: PDF(182 KB) DOC(162 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]
OPINION on New Circular Economy Action Plan
2020/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2077(INI)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(71 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010
2022/07/06
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0366(COD)
Documents: PDF(220 KB) DOC(177 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]
OPINION on the implementation report on the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
2023/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/2188(INI)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(46 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna CAVAZZINI', 'mepid': 86793}]

Shadow opinions (13)

OPINION on shortage of medicines – how to address an emerging problem
2020/05/28
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2020/2071(INI)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(70 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andrey KOVATCHEV', 'mepid': 97968}]
OPINION on the recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020/05/28
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2023(INI)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(70 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Kris PEETERS', 'mepid': 197420}]
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on corporate due diligence and corporate accountability
2020/10/28
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2020/2129(INL)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(51 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Bernd LANGE', 'mepid': 1909}]
OPINION on New Circular Economy Action Plan
2020/11/12
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2020/2077(INI)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(70 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Svenja HAHN', 'mepid': 197444}]
OPINION on the draft Council decision on the Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union
2021/01/29
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2020/0024(NLE)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(47 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Gabriel MATO', 'mepid': 96936}]
OPINION on competition policy – annual report 2020
2021/02/24
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2223(INI)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(49 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andrus ANSIP', 'mepid': 124696}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the access of third-country goods and services to the Union’s internal market in public procurement and procedures supporting negotiations on access of Union goods and services to the public procurement markets of third countries
2021/10/29
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2012/0060(COD)
Documents: PDF(223 KB) DOC(185 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Ivan ŠTEFANEC', 'mepid': 124929}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020
2021/12/09
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/0353(COD)
Documents: PDF(411 KB) DOC(263 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Antonius MANDERS', 'mepid': 4560}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries
2022/06/22
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0406(COD)
Documents: PDF(210 KB) DOC(174 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Svenja HAHN', 'mepid': 197444}]
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937
2023/01/26
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2022/0051(COD)
Documents: PDF(219 KB) DOC(177 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Barry ANDREWS', 'mepid': 204332}]
OPINION on the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles
2023/03/29
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/2171(INI)
Documents: PDF(135 KB) DOC(52 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anne-Sophie PELLETIER', 'mepid': 197527}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020
2023/07/20
Committee: INTA
Dossiers: 2023/0079(COD)
Documents: PDF(221 KB) DOC(171 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU', 'mepid': 197695}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology products manufacturing ecosystem (Net Zero Industry Act)
2023/09/20
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2023/0081(COD)
Documents: PDF(211 KB) DOC(155 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Tom VANDENKENDELAERE', 'mepid': 129164}]

Institutional motions (79)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation at the USA-Mexican border
2019/07/15
Dossiers: 2019/2733(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela
2019/07/15
Dossiers: 2019/2730(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women's rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
2019/09/16
Dossiers: 2019/2823(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
2019/09/16
Dossiers: 2019/2822(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Turkey, notably the removal of elected mayors
2019/09/16
Dossiers: 2019/2821(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women’s rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
2019/09/18
Dossiers: 2019/2823(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
2019/09/18
Dossiers: 2019/2822(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on situation in Turkey, notably the removal of elected mayors
2019/09/18
Dossiers: 2019/2821(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The proposed new Criminal Code of Indonesia
2019/10/21
Dossiers: 2019/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Turkish military operation in northeast Syria and its consequences
2019/10/21
Dossiers: 2019/2886(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on children’s rights on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
2019/11/20
Dossiers: 2019/2876(RSP)
Documents: PDF(205 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Bolivia
2019/11/25
Dossiers: 2019/2896(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights and democracy in Nicaragua
2019/12/16
Dossiers: 2019/2978(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on India’s Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019
2020/01/22
Dossiers: 2020/2519(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a common charger for mobile radio equipment
2020/01/22
Dossiers: 2019/2983(RSP)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the gender pay gap
2020/01/22
Dossiers: 2019/2870(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on India’s Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019
2020/01/28
Dossiers: 2020/2519(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU priorities for the 64th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women
2020/02/05
Dossiers: 2019/2967(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Child labour in mines in Madagascar
2020/02/10
Dossiers: 2020/2552(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy
2020/06/10
Dossiers: 2020/2665(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Mozambique
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2784(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Philippines, including the case of Maria Ressa
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2782(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Dr. Denis Mukwege in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2783(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Russia: the poisoning of Alexei Navalny
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2777(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2779(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on COVID-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification, and the consequences for Schengen and the single market
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2780(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on COVID-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification, and the consequences for Schengen and the single market
2020/09/16
Dossiers: 2020/2780(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the "Foreign Agents" Law in Nicaragua
2020/10/05
Dossiers: 2020/2814(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(47 KB)
RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to the Commission delegated regulation of 20 November 2020 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 as regards the time-limits for lodging entry summary declarations and pre-departure declarations in case of transport by sea from and to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man
2020/12/09
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2890(DEA)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
2020/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/2913(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy et Le Huu Minh Tuan
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2021/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arrest of Alexei Navalny in Moscow
2021/01/19
Dossiers: 2021/2513(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID 19 pandemic situation in Latin America
2021/04/26
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs
2021/05/12
Dossiers: 2021/2644(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The listing of German NGOs as ‘undesirable organisations’ by Russia and the detention of Andrei Pivovarov
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2749(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the legal changes adopted by the Hungarian Parliament
2021/07/06
Dossiers: 2021/2780(RSP)
Documents: PDF(209 KB) DOC(62 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
2021/07/06
Dossiers: 2021/2777(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Afghanistan
2021/09/13
Dossiers: 2021/2877(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on media freedom and further deterioration of the rule of law in Poland
2021/09/14
Dossiers: 2021/2880(RSP)
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus after one year of protests and their violent repression
2021/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law crisis in Poland and the primacy of EU law
2021/10/19
Dossiers: 2021/2935(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the first anniversary of the de facto abortion ban in Poland
2021/11/03
Dossiers: 2021/2925(RSP)
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nicaragua
2021/12/08
Dossiers: 2021/3000(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia
2021/12/13
Dossiers: 2021/3020(RSP)
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2580(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the right to repair
2022/03/30
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/2515(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the EU Protection of children and young people fleeing because of the war in Ukraine
2022/04/05
Dossiers: 2022/2618(RSP)
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2658(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine
2022/05/13
Dossiers: 2022/2655(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturning of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court
2022/06/06
Dossiers: 2022/2665(RSP)
Documents: PDF(229 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang Police Files
2022/06/07
Dossiers: 2022/2700(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia
2022/06/20
Dossiers: 2022/2716(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of indigenous and environmental defenders in Brazil, including the killing of Dom Phillips and Bruno Pereira
2022/07/04
Dossiers: 2022/2752(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and women’s heath in the EU
2022/07/05
Dossiers: 2022/2742(RSP)
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(55 KB)
on the situation of indigenous and environmental defenders in Brazil, including the killing of Dom Phillips and Bruno Pereira
2022/07/06
Dossiers: 2022/2752(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Violations of human rights in Uganda and Tanzania linked to the investments in fossil fuels projects
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/2826(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the consequences of drought, fire and other extreme weather phenomena: increasing EU’s efforts to fight climate change
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/2829(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(60 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death of Mahsa Amini and the repression of women’s rights protesters in Iran
2022/10/03
Dossiers: 2022/2849(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression against Ukraine
2022/10/03
Dossiers: 2022/2851(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the outcome of the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2934(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Afghanistan, especially the deterioration of women’s rights and attacks against educational institutions
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2955(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the outcome of the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on suspicions of corruption from Qatar and the broader need for transparency and accountability in the European institutions
2022/12/13
Dossiers: 2022/3012(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 30th anniversary of the single market: celebrating achievements and looking towards future developments
2023/01/10
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/3015(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU response to ongoing protests and executions in Iran
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2511(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the establishment of a tribunal on the crime of aggression against Ukraine
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2022/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the storming of the Brazilian democratic institutions
2023/01/16
Dossiers: 2023/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(43 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the storming of the Brazilian democratic institutions
2023/01/18
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on an EU strategy to boost industrial competitiveness, trade and quality jobs
2023/01/25
Dossiers: 2023/2513(RSP)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on an EU strategy to boost industrial competitiveness, trade and quality jobs
2023/02/08
Dossiers: 2023/2513(RSP)
Documents: PDF(182 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the recent deterioration of the inhuman imprisonment conditions of Alexey Navalny and other political prisoners in Russia1
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2553(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on one year of Russia’s invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2558(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on an EU strategy to boost industrial competitiveness, trade and quality jobs
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(181 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iran: in particular the poisoning of hundreds of schoolgirls
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2587(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Guatemala: situation after the elections, rule of law and judicial independence
2023/09/11
Dossiers: 2023/2831(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh after Azerbaijan’s attack and continuing threats against Armenia
2023/10/02
Dossiers: 2023/2879(RSP)
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the effectiveness of the EU sanctions on Russia
2023/11/06
Dossiers: 2023/2905(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the murder of Alexei Navalny and the need for EU action in support of political prisoners and oppressed civil society in Russia
2024/02/26
Dossiers: 2024/2579(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(48 KB)

Oral questions (9)

Facial recognition and identification in publicly accessible spaces
2020/03/01
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Dual quality of products in the single market
2020/07/09
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Towards a new consumer agenda beyond 2020
2020/10/13
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Evaluation of the Geo-blocking Regulation
2021/02/23
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU-EEA-Switzerland: internal market cooperation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and more than 25 years of efforts to fully implement internal market rules
2021/03/17
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The EU’s responsibility to protect local staff targeted due to their working relations with the EU
2021/09/23
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Enforcement of revolving door rules by the Commission
2021/10/15
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Barriers to the free movement of goods
2021/10/28
Documents: PDF(37 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Right to repair
2022/03/16
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)

Written explanations (1)

Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament (B9-0412/2021, B9-0413/2021)

. – On 15 June 2021, the Hungarian Parliament voted in favour of amendments proposed by Fidesz MPs that severely restrict freedom of speech and children’s rights. The Law prohibits the ‘portrayal and promotion of gender identity different from sex assigned at birth, the change of sex and homosexuality’ in schools, in television programmes and in publicly available advertisements on any platforms for persons aged under 18, even for educational purposes; the Law disqualifies such content from being considered as a public service announcement or social responsibility advertisement even if intended for adults; the Law introduces amendments to the Child Protection Act, the Family Protection Act, the Act on Business Advertising Activity, the Media Act and the Public Education Act.I consider this Law to be in breach of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary, in particular the freedom to provide services and freedom of movement of goods as set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and E-commerce Directive in conjunction with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Therefore I voted in favour of the resolution ‘Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the legal changes adopted in the Hungarian Parliament’.
2021/07/08

Written questions (56)

Food standards in trade negotiations between the US and the EU
2020/01/29
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Health and environmental impacts of the Turów opencast lignite mine
2020/03/27
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
The Commission’s decision to award a contract to BlackRock to oversee the development of ESG factors in the EU banking sector and corporate investment policies
2020/04/20
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Danish Government’s border opening measures
2020/06/11
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Green Deal compatibility criteria for Projects of Common Interest
2020/06/18
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Commission intervention in South African copyright reform on behalf of international rights holders
2020/06/23
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
TEN-E revision, TYNDP and 5th PCI list
2020/07/01
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Health risks of laser printer emissions
2020/07/06
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Systematic and coordinated push‑backs by the Greek authorities
2020/09/03
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Disclosure of information concerning the award of a bid on environmental sustainability guideline (ESG) factors to BlackRock
2020/09/30
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Prosecution of NGOs in Greece
2020/10/07
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Renegotiation of the Energy Charter Treaty: alignment with the Paris Agreement before the 2021 COP and next steps envisaged by the EU
2020/10/12
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Energy Charter Treaty renegotiation: the EU’s position regarding fossil fuels protection, the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism and public information
2020/10/12
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU rural development funds possibly used for defence policies in Colombia
2020/11/10
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Crackdown on reproductive rights in Poland amid the ongoing crisis of the rule of law
2020/11/10
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Deforestation in the Colombian Amazon
2020/11/13
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Poland’s abortion ban ruling
2020/11/20
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
New evidence of push‑backs at the Croatian border – will the Commission now finally start to react?
2020/11/26
Documents: PDF(62 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Transparency of contracts for COVID-19 vaccines
2020/12/04
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Regulating short-term letting
2021/01/06
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Mercosur: the need to reopen negotiations owing to environmental concerns
2021/01/26
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Data adequacy assessment for the UK and the right to privacy (1), including a 4(+2)‑month temporary extension for transfers of personal data
2021/01/29
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement and the right to privacy (2)
2021/01/29
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU-Mercosur Association Agreement: next steps, sustainability assessment and climate protection
2021/05/10
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Circular economy and recycling targets for municipal waste
2021/05/11
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Corporate sustainable governance and unfair purchasing practices
2021/06/01
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Ending the export of banned pesticides: concrete actions
2021/06/03
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Sustainability impact assessment on the trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur
2021/06/30
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Activation of the human rights clause in trade agreements
2021/08/30
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Assessment of the Nord Stream 2 investment arbitration case against the EU based on the Energy Charter Treaty
2021/10/20
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU-US Trade and Technology Council and the role of the European Parliament
2021/10/28
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Repression of the Mapuche people in Chile
2021/11/26
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Written question on the death of a pregnant Polish woman after being denied an abortion
2021/11/30
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Google blocking independent repairers’ online advertisements
2021/12/06
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Regulatory Scrutiny Board and the sustainable corporate governance initiative
2022/01/25
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Achieving environmental and climate targets under the EU Strategy for Sustainable Textiles through new binding legislation and aligned financial flows
2022/02/08
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
EU strategy for sustainable textiles and subsequent legislation and the need to reduce the textile industry’s greenhouse gas emissions
2022/02/08
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Forced labour: new freight lines Xinjiang-Europe and XPCC-related entities
2022/03/16
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Situation of indigenous rights in Brazil after the expiry of land protection orders
2022/03/28
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles
2022/04/22
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Recognition of the professional qualifications of Ukrainian refugees
2022/05/16
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Threats against employees of the Fresenius hospital group in Colombia
2022/06/08
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
The human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
2022/06/22
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Human rights violations against Maasai communities living in the Loliondo division of Ngorongoro district in Tanzania
2022/07/06
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Duration of legal procedures for the granting of EU aid and share of aid earmarked for climate policy
2022/10/03
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Large-scale pro-Russian disinformation operations online on Twitter and Facebook
2022/10/19
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Delay in publication of the proposal on the right to repair
2022/10/27
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Next steps for the Energy Charter Treaty
2023/02/09
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
The humanitarian crisis of the Yanomami in the Amazon
2023/03/13
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Apple’s circumvention of the common charger directive
2023/03/27
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Reform of UK data protection framework
2023/06/05
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Arbitrary arrest of prominent Vietnamese environmental defender Hoang Thi Minh Hong
2023/06/14
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Measures to address Chinese dumping of solar modules, threatening the European solar industry
2023/09/21
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Your Europe Advice service
2023/11/14
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Border controls on Saxony’s borders with Czechia and Poland
2023/12/20
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Abolition of seasonal time changes – current position of the Council
2024/02/21
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)

Individual motions (1)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the review of the Financial Regulation and the Commission’s guidelines on public procurement for policy-related service contracts
2021/06/04
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(45 KB)

Amendments (1945)

Amendment 3 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the fact that in 2022, China was the EU’s second largest trade in goods partner; expresses concern about the increasingly unbalanced trade and investment relationship between the EU and China, which is also highlighted by the EU’s record trade deficit of EUR 396 billion in 2022; highlights China’s unbalanced international trade policy in the context of its Dual Circulation Strategy; asks the European Commission to raise European concerns with China on its managed trade practices;
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Chinese investments in Europe continued to decline in 2022, reaching a 10-year low of EUR 7.9 billion; welcomes Chinese investment if it doesn’t hurt security or the public order; emphasizes that at the same time adequate investment screening must be pursued;
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is nevertheless convinced that the trade and investment relationship between the EU and China is of strategic importance and should be rules-based, with the multilateral trading system and the principle of reciprocity at its core; emphasizes in this context the expectation that China would support ambitious WTO-reform; insists on more reciprocity and advocates strong EU actions against unfair Chinese regulations affecting trade and investment;
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that trade and investment arshould be key drivers of sustainable growth, job creation and innovation and that the EU should therefore maintain its economic openness1 ; _________________ 1 Commission communication of 18 February 2021 entitled ‘Trade Policy Review – An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy’ (COM(2021)0066).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s proposed European economic security strategy2 and the de-risking paradigm , which aims to maximise the benefits of the EU’s economic openness while minimising the risks resulting from economic interdependencies; approves of the fact that the strategy explicitly recognises that risks to the physical and cyber security of critical infrastructure are key security vulnerabilities for European economies; _________________ 2 Joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 20 June 2023 on ‘European Economic Security Strategy’ (JOIN(2023)0020).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the Regulation on the screening of foreign direct investments3 addresses risks to security and public order resulting from investments from outside the EU; notes that critical infrastructure is among the factors that may be taken into consideration by the Member States or the Commission in determining whether an investment is likely to affect security or public order; encourages the Commission to present an ambitious legislative proposal on a revised EU FDI screening Regulation adequately addressing all the loopholes that have emerged during the implementation of the present Regulation, as well as a legislative proposal on a screening mechanism for outbound investments. _________________ 3 Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union (OJ L 79I, 21.3.2019, p. 1).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union and its Member States, in particular its article 10 on the review of its TSD provisions and the stakeholders consultation,
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
– having regard to the Opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU on the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore,
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 c (new)
– having regard to the Joint Declarations of the EU and the Canada Domestic Advisory Groups (DAGs),
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 22 June 2022 entitled: “The power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth” (COM(2022)409,
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2022 on the future of EU international investment policy,
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas CETA was the firstsecond trade agreement the EU completed with another major established OECD economy after South Korea; whereas it was also the most ambitiouscomprehensive agreement either the EU or Canada had concluded at the time, including unprecedented access to public procurement at sub-federal as well as federal level;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas important provisions, in particular relating to investment protection which is a contentious issue, have still not been applied, as not all Member States have ratified the agreement; where Canada and the EU are finalizing a draft Decision of the CETA Joint Committee on the interpretation of certain terms in Article 8.10, Annex 8-A and Article 8.39 specifying the remit of right to regulate in the context of the investment protection chapter and on the facilitation of the access by SMEs to the investment court system under CETA;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas such topics as regulatory chill, exhaustion of remedies, the rights of third parties and damages have received limited attention in the MIC negotiations; whereas MIC negotiations are not covering substantive investors’ rights and protection standards;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the institutional framework under CETA is now fully in place, with 19 specialised committees, a regulatory cooperation forum and a civil society forum, and their agendas and reportre publicly available while detailed minutes of the meetings are not publicly available;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas the CETA has been complemented by a Green Alliance Initiative, a Strategic Partnership on Raw Materials, an EU-Canada Digital Partnership and an Ocean Partnership;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas Canada is an active participant of the WTO Dialogue on Plastics Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade and the WTO Trade and Environment Committee but is not a member of the Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform (FFSR) initiative;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas there is now sufficient experience, data and statistical information to assess the implean ex post evaluation of CETA is yet to provide detailed data of the impacts of the Agremeent and, where appropriate, recommentdation of CETAs to improve it;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas Canada is a world leader in the co-construction of Public Policy for the Social and Solidarity Economy and whereas Social and Solidarity Economy represents almost 10% of the Gross Domestic Product in certain provinces, like Quebec, providing for approximately 210 000 jobs;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with satisfaction that trade in goods between the EU and Canada increased by 53 % between 2017 and 2022, while EU-Canada trade in services increased by 46 %, outperforming other extra-EU trade; welcomes the fact that EU goods exports to Canada increased by 47 % during the first five years of provisional application, where the biggest gains were registered in the cases of manufactured products, chemical products as well as food and animal products; notes that none of the data actually provided thus far displays a regional break down allowing to assess the country-specific impacts among the Member States;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the utilisation rate of the tariff rate quota (TRQ) for beef and veal imports to the EU was only 3 % in 2021, and that EU exporters have expanded their market share in Canada, such that the EU exports more frozen beef to Canada than it imports from it; notes however that the utilisation rate of this TRQ may change over time as a result of variations in Canada's other export markets (in particular the US and China);
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Is concerned that according to the audit report of the European Commisison´s Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (2022), "the competent authority actions undertaken in response to the relevant recommendations (i.e. in relation to the traceability of EU-eligible cattle, the low performance of approved veterinarians responsible for official controls on primary production and to the supervision of these approved veterinarians) cannot be considered effective in satisfactorily addressing the shortcomings identified at holding level during the 2019 audit”;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the parties to make available all the legal and administrative support and tools SMEs need to engage in trade and investment under CETA, in order to foster an increase in exchanges and to enhance participation so they can reap the benefits of CETA, including through active measures to facilitate the internationalisation of SMEs; welcomes, in this regard, the recommendation on SMEs adopted by the Joint Committee in 2018, and the subsequent action plans, including concrete actions such as the launch of the Access2Markets platform in October 2020, which supports SMEs with practical information on trade agreements and trade barriers; expects the ex-post evaluation to provide data on the evolution of the share of trade between EU and Canada carried out by SMEs; calls on the Parties to contemplate the possibility of a fully- fledged chapter on SMEs like in the Agreements with New Zealand and Chile;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Given the importance of the Social and Solidarity Economy sector in Canada and the EC Action Plan on Social Economy adopted by the European Commission on 9th December 2021, calls on the Joint Committee to identify what concrete measures could be put in place to promote more cooperation between Social and Solidarity actors across the Atlantic;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Notes that the Investment Chapter is not in line with the approach recommended by the EP in its Resolution on the future of EU international investment policy when it comes to the protection of investments in fossil fuel, the right to regulate and issues related to investors’ substantive rights, or the duration of the sunset clause; calls on the Parties to review this Chapter accordingly;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages both parties to continue their outreach activities, in particular focusing on SMEs and on Social and Solidarity Economy actors, to raise awareness about the opportunities offered by CETA through targeted information campaigns, while ensuring that the benefits of the agreement are shared equally between men and women;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 90 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the adoption of the recommendation on Trade and Gender by the CETA Joint Committee as early as 2018, which includes a commitment to share methods and procedures for the collection of gender disaggregated data, the use of indicators, monitoring and evaluation methodologies, and the analysis of gender-focused statistics related to trade; takes the view that the work carried out under the jointly adopted action plan can serve as an example for other trade agreements, even when there are no dedicated chapters on trade and gender in the agreement itself; recalls the EP resolution on the Gender Action Plan III and encourages the Commission to publish more easily accessible gender disaggregated data on the usage of the agreement, especially in relation with the Chapters on Public Procurement and on Trade and Labour;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that CETA provides a framework that fosters both trade and climate action by including commitments to cooperate on trade-related environmental issues of common interest such as climate change, as demonstrated by the recommendation on trade, climate action and the Paris Agreement; welcomes the growth of the environmental goods trade by 27 % since provisional application startednotes however that Canada often considers as technical barriers to trade the precautionary principle and some European legislative and non-legislative initiatives (deforestation, pesticides, fertilisers, antimicrobial and antibiotic resistance, neonicotinoids...) that are key to implement the European Green Deal;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Welcomes the growth of the environmental goods trade by 27 % since provisional application started; invites the Parties to find synergies with the implementation of CBAM in the EU and jointly support work to develop joint or comparable carbon emissions methodologies at international level;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the active involvement and monitoring of CETA implementation by the domestic advisory groups (DAGs) and the Civil Society Forum, which gatherings hundreds of representatives from across the EU and Canada, including businesses, environmental and labour organisations, civil society, academia as well as indigenous people’s representatives from Canada, and actively contributing to the work of in particular the Trade and Sustainable Development Committee, notably through their joint statements of their DAGs; urges the Commission and the TSD Board to follow up on their proposals; stresses that the mandate of the DAGs should be to consider the sustainability impact of the full agreement;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Insists on the effective implementation of the specific commitments related to the trade and sustainable development (TSD) provisions, including the early TSD review committed to in the Joint Interpretative Instrument (JII), which are an integral part of CETA and are essential to the accomplishment of the objectives set; takes note that in 2024 the Commission will conduct an ex post evaluation of CETA, including its TSD chapter, involving independent experts; deplores that not only are the TSD provisions not aligned with the European Commission's new approach of June 2022, but the EU has also rejected the concrete proposals put forward by Canada in 2020 to give a more binding scope to certain provisions of this chapter;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Recalls that in its Opinion 2/50, the European Court of Justice concluded that “the European Union enjoys exclusive external competence [when it comes to] trade and sustainable development in so far as the provisions in question primarily relate to commercial policy instruments”; is of the view that the Commission is therefore entitled to negotiate on behalf of the Member States an alignment of the TSD Chapter on the recent sustainability proposals and that it would have no consequences in terms of ratification in the Member States;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Invites the Parties to agree upon an interpretative declaration clarifying that pursuant to Opinion 2/15 of the ECJ, “a breach of the provisions concerning social protection of workers and environmental protection (...) authorises the other Party — in accordance with the rule of customary international law codified in Article 60(1) of the Convention on the law of treaties, signed in Vienna on 23 May 1969 (...) — to terminate or suspend the liberalisation, provided for in the other provisions of the envisaged agreement, of that trade” (para 161);
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Calls for the CETA Joint Committee to adopt as per Articles 26.1§4e and 26.3 a binding decision establishing implementation roadmaps to strengthen cooperation in areas where the ex post evaluation would identify shortcomings and room for improvement;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the parties to conclude the early TSD review of CETA in order to introduce a suitable and effective dispute settlement mechanism for the provisions on trade and labour and trade and environment, including the consideration of, among various enforcement methods, sanctions as a deterrent to be used, as a last resort, in the case of serious breaches of the Paris Climate Agreement and the ILO fundamental labour principles;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2023/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. UrgInvites Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland and Slovenia to ratify CETA, as this will also be essential in order to update the agreement, and reiterates the importance of full application of CETA, including its investment protection provisionswait for (a) the results of the future ex post evaluation assessment and accompanying proposals and (b) the alignment of CETA to the updated EU approach on trade and sustainable development chapters before they complete the ratification of CETA;
2023/10/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Essential safety requirements for toys should ensure protection from all relevant health and safety hazards posed by toys, for users or third parties. Particular safety requirements should cover the physical and mechanical properties, flammability, chemical properties, electrical properties, hygiene, cybersecurity and radioactivity to ensure that the safety of children is adequately protected against those specific hazards. Since it is possible that toys which present hazards that are not covered by a particular safety requirement might exist or be developed, it is necessary to maintain a general requirement of safety to ensure protection of children in respect of such toys. The safety of toys should be determined by reference to the intended use, while taking into account also the foreseeable use, and bearing in mind the behaviour of children, who do not generally show the same degree of care as the average adult user. Together, the general safety requirement and the particular safety requirements should form the essential safety requirements for toys.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Relying on digital technologies has led to new hazards in toys. Radio toys are to comply with essential requirements, including on cybersecurity, for the protection of privacy and internet- connected toys are to incorporate safeguards towards cybersecurity and protection from fraud in accordance with Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council30 . Toys which include artificial intelligence are to comply with Regulation (EU) …/….../... [P.O. insert serial number for Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence]31 . Therefore, particular safety requirements regarding cybersecurity, protection of personal data and privacy or other hazards stemming from the incorporation of artificial intelligence in toys should not be set out. However, protecting the health of children should not merely ensure the absence of disease or infirmity and relying on digital technologies may pose risks to children which go beyond their physical health. To ensure that children are protected from any risk coming from the use of digital technologies in toys, the general safety requirement should ensure the psychological and mental health, as well as the well-being and cognitive development, of children. _________________ 30 Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62). 31 PO: Please insert in the text the number of the Regulation andorizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020]. However, internet-connected toys might pose specific health and safety risks which can only be provoked by a cyberattack. Internet-connected toys attacked by malicious third parties may pose specific risks that, depending on their intended use or reasonably foreseen misuse, can impact the health and safety of its users. In this respect, health and safety risks in connection with the cybersecurity functions of instert the number, danet-connecte,d title and OJ referencoys shall fall within the scope of thatis Regulation in the footnote.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) Toys which include artificial intelligence are to comply with Regulation (EU) …/…[P.O. insert serial number for Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence]. As this Regulation focuses mainly on “high-risks AI systems" and does not specifically address toys, particular safety requirements regarding cybersecurity, protection of personal data and privacy or other hazards stemming from the incorporation of artificial intelligence in toys should be set out.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 b (new)
(14 b) Protecting the health of children should not merely ensure the absence of disease or infirmity and relying on digital technologies may pose risks to children which go beyond their physical health. To ensure that children are protected from any risk coming from the use of digital technologies in toys, the general safety requirement should ensure the psychological and mental health, as well as the well-being and cognitive development, of children.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to provide for flexibility where the safety of children is not compromised and where it is necessary for making certain toys available on the market, it should be possible to derogate from the generic prohibitions of chemical substances in toys. Derogations to generic prohibitions permitting the use of prohibited substances should be of general application and should only be possible where the use of the relevant substance is considered safe for children, where there are no commercially viable alternatives for the substanceelimination or substitution of such prohibited substances via design changes or other materials or components is not technically possible, where there are no technically viable alternatives for the substance, where a substitution plan has been submitted and where the use of the substance is not prohibited in consumer articles under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. The assessment of the safety of the substance in toys should be carried out by the relevant scientific committees in the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in order to ensure consistency and efficient use of resources in the assessment of chemical substances in the Union.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The use of nickel in stainless steel and in components that transmit electric current has been considered safe in toys by the Scientific Committee on Health, Environment and Emerging risks and should be allow. However, since children should also be adequately protected from allergenic substances and certain metals its use should be limited. Other substances that are necessary to transmit electric current should be permitted in toys to allow for the making available of electric toys if such substances are completely inaccessible for a child playing with the toy and therefore do not present a risk.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Directive 2009/48/EC includes limit values for certain substances in toys intended for children under 36 months or intended to be put in the mouth. In a family with more than one child, children under 36 months are likely to be attracted by the toys of their siblings that are older than 36 months, making it in practice impossible to completely shield children below 36 months from the toys of their elder siblings. Those substances have shown to also pose a risk to older children, as they could be equally exposed to such chemicals via skin contact or inhalation. These limit values should therefore apply to all toys. Since the adoption of the limit values for bisphenol A in Directive 2009/48/EC, new scientific data has emerged. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) re-evaluated the risks to public health from dietary exposure to bisphenol A in April 2023 concluding that exposure to bisphenol A is a health concern for consumers across all age groups. EFSA has established a new tolerable daily intake of bisphenol A which is significantly lower than the previous one. In view of this scientific evidence, bisphenol A should fall under the generic prohibition for CMR substances in toye structural similarities between different bisphenols leading to comparable risks for children, and to avoid regrettable substitution, toys should not contain any bisphenols.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) To prevent misuse of warnings to circumvent the applicable safety requirements, the warnings provided for certain categories of toy should not be allowed if they conflict with the intended use of the toy. To ensure that supervisors are aware of any risks associated with the toy, it is necessary to ensure that the warnings are legible and visible. Minimum requirements on important parameters such as font size, distance and contrast should therefore be laid down.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Economic operatorsAny natural or legal person that either places a toy on the market under their own name or trademark or substantially modifyies a toy in such a way that compliancenformity with applicable requirements of this Regulation mayight be affected, should be considered to be the manufacturers and should assume the obligations of the manufacturers.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Toys are to comply with traceability requirements in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2023/988. Ensuring traceability of a toy throughout the whole supply chain helps to make market surveillance simpler and more efficient. An efficient traceability system facilitates market surveillance authorities' task of tracing economic operators who made non- compliant toys available on the market.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) It is appropriate to provide for the publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union indicating the date when the interconnection between the registry and the EU Customs Single Window Certificates Exchange System referred to in Article 13 of [P.O. insert serial number for Regulation (EU) …/… on Ecodesign Requirements for Sustainable Products] becomes operational in order to facilitate public access to that information. Similar publication should be provided should further customs IT systems become operational.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) If a conformity assessment body demonstrates conformity of the toy with the criteria laid down in harmonised standards, ithe toy should be presumed to comply with the corresponding requirements set out in this Regulation.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) In order to take into account technical and scientific progress or new scientific evidence, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending this Regulation by adapting the specific warnings to be affixed on toys, adopting specific requirements concerning chemical substances and limit values in toys and granting derogations to include specific uses allowed in toys of substances subject to generic prohibitions.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – title
SObjective and subject matter
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down rules on the safety of toys,e objective of this Regulation is to ensuringe a high level of protection of health and safety of children and other persons, and on the free movement of toys in the Union.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This Regulation lays down rules on the safety of toys placed or made available on the market that are underpinned by the precautionary principle. Economic operators shall place or make available on the market only toys that do not adversely affect the health and safety of children and other persons.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘authorised representative’ means any natural or legal person established within the Union who has received a written mandate from a manufacturer to act on that person’s behalf in relation to specified tasks with regard to the manufacturer’s obligations under this Regulation;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) ‘economic operator’ means the manufacturer, the authorised representative, the importer, the distributor and the fulfilment service provider or any other natural or legal person who is subject to obligations in relation to the manufacture of products or making them available on the market in accordance with this Regulation;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘online marketplace’ means online marketplace as defined in Article 3, point (14), of Regulation (EU) 2023/98819/2161;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12 a) ‘toy’ means a product designed or intended, whether or not exclusively, for use in play by children under 14 years of age, whether or not having digital elements which allow for a direct or indirect connection to a device or network.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28
(28) ‘market surveillance authority’ means a market surveillance authority as defined in Article 3, point (4), of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 as responsible for organising and carrying out market surveillance in the territory of that Member State;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
(28 a) ‘notifying authority' means an authority designated by a Member State under Article 25 and 26 as responsible for the assessment and notification of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of that Member State;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Where necessary to ensure their safe use and the health and safety of children and other persons, toys shall bear a general warning specifying appropriate user limitations. The user limitations shall include at least the minimum or maximum age of the user and, where appropriate, the required abilities of the user, the maximum or minimum weight of the user and the need to ensure that the toy is used only under adult supervision.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 195 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The manufacturer shall mark warnings in a clearly visible, easily legible, accessible and understandable and accurate manner on the toy, on an affixed label or on the packaging and, if appropriate, on the instructions for use which accompany the toy. Small toys which are sold without packaging shall have appropriate warnings affixed to them.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 198 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Warnings shall be clearly visible to the consumer before the purchase, including in cases where the purchase is made through distance sales. Warnings shall be of sufficient size to ensure their visibility and legibility. In particular, warnings shall have the characteristics set out in Annex III.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Before placing toys on the market, manufacturers shall carry out an internal risk analysis and draw up the required technical documentation in accordance with Article 23 and carry out the applicable conformity assessment procedure in accordance with Article 22 or have it carried out.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Manufacturers shall keep up to date the technical documentation and the product passport for a period of at least 10 years after the last model of the toy covered by that documentation and product passport has been placed on the market.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When manufacturers,deemed appropriate with regard to the risks presented by a toy, consider it necessary for the protection of health and safety of consumers, manufacturers shall, carry out sample testing of marketed toys.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 209 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Manufacturers shall ensure that toys bear a type, batch, serial or model number or other element allowing their identification and which is easily visible and legible for consumers, or, where the size or nature of the toy does not allow it, that the required information is provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the toy.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. Manufacturers shall ensure that the toy is accompanied by instructions and safety information in a language or languages easily understood by consumers and other end-users, including persons with disabilities, as determined by the Member State concerned. Such instructions and information shall be clear, understandable and legible.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Where manufacturers consider, or have reason to believe, that a toy which they have placed on the market is not in conformity with this Regue relevant Union harmonisation legislation, they shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring that toy into conformity, withdraw it or recall it, as appropriate.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 219 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they have made the toy available, via the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2023/988, giving details, in particular, of any non- compliance and of any corrective measures takenthe risks to the health and safety to consumers and of any corrective measures taken and if available, of the quantity, by Member State, of the toys still circulating in the market; and
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 221 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10
10. Manufacturers shall ensure that other economic operators, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, and providers of online marketplaces, in the supply chain concerned, are kept informed in a timely manner of any non-conformity that the manufacturers have identifiedor risk to the health or the environment that the manufacturers have identified and of any corrective action, recall or withdrawal.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) keep the technical documentation at the disposal of national surveillance authorities and ensure that the product passport is available, in accordance with Article 17(2), for a period of at least 10 years after the last model of the toy covered by those documents has been placed on the market;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) further to a reasoned request from a competent national authority, provide that authority with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a toy in an official language that can be understood by the authority;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 232 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) cooperate with the competent national authorities, at their request, on any action taken to eliminate in an effective manner the risks posed by toys covered by the mandate.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) immediately terminate the mandate if the manufacturer does not comply with the obligations of the manufacturer under this Regulation and immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which is established;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new)
(c b) where the authorised representative considers or has reason to believe that a toy is a dangerous product, inform the manufacturer thereof;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 236 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c c (new)
(c c) inform the competent national authorities about any action taken to eliminate the risks posed by toys covered by their mandate through a notification in the Safety Business Gateway, where the information has not been already provided by the manufacturer or upon instruction of the manufacturer;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c d (new)
(c d) in case of change of authorised representative, the detailed arrangements for the change shall be clearly defined in an agreement between the manufacturer, where practicable the outgoing authorised representative, and the incoming authorised representative. That agreement shall address at least the date of termination of the mandate of the outgoing authorised representative and date of beginning of the mandate of the incoming authorised representative, as well as the transfer of documents, including confidentiality aspects and property rights.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the relevant information in the product passport has been included in the product passport registry in accordance with Article 17(2) and Article 19(1);
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 243 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Importers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the postal and electronic address at which they can be contacted on the toy or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the toy. Importers shall ensure that any additional label does not obscure any information required by Union law on the label provided by the manufacturer.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Where importers consider, or have reason to believe, that a toy that they have placed on the market presents a risk to health and safety of consumers and other end-users, they shall immediately inform the manufacturer, the competent national authorities of the Member States in which they made the toy available to that effect, giving details, in particular, of the non- compliance, or risk to the health and safety of consumers, and of any corrective measures taken.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 250 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Importers shall ensure that all relevant economic operators and providers of online marketplaces in the supply chain concerned are kept informed in a timely manner of any non-conformity or risk to the health or the environment that they have identified, and of any corrective action, recall or withdrawal.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 251 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2
Importers shall keep the manufacturer, distributors and, where relevant, providers of online marketplaces informed in a timely manner of the investigation performed and of the results of the investigation.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 256 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. When making a toy available on the market, distributors shall act with due care in relation tocomply with the requirements of this Regulation.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Where distributors consider, or have reason to believe, that a toy that they have made available on the market presents a risk, they shall immediately inform the manufacturer or the importer, as applicable, the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made the toy available to that effect, giving details, in particular, of the non- compliance or risk to health and safety of consumers, and of any corrective measures taken.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 263 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Cases in which obligations of manufacturers apply to importers and distributorother persons
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
An importer or a distributor natural or legal person shall be considered a manufacturer for the purposes of this Regulation, and shall be subject to the obligations of the manufacturer under Article 7, where such importer or distributornatural or legal person places a toy on the market under its name or trademark or modifies a toy already placed on the market in such a way that compliance with the applicable requirements of this Regulation may be affected.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
A natural or legal person, other than the manufacturer, that substantially modifies the product within the meaning of Article 13 (3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/988, shall be deemed to be a manufacturer for the purposes of this Regulation and shall be subject to the obligations of the manufacturer set out in Article 7 for the part of the product affected by the modification or for the entire product if the substantial modification has an impact on its safety.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 270 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article11a Providers of online marketplaces 1. Without prejudice to the prohibition to conduct general monitoring as established under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, providers of online marketplaces shall, before and after allowing the offering of the toy by the trader, make reasonable efforts to conduct simple random samples to check whether the toys offered on their interface have been identified as dangerous in the Safety Gate Portal. 2. Providers of online marketplaces are subject to specific obligations in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2023/988 concerning the removal of content referring to an offer of a dangerous toy from their online interfaces and regarding the cooperation with market surveillance authorities and relevant economic operators to facilitate any action taken to eliminate or, if that is not possible, to mitigate the risks presented by a toy that is or was offered online through their services. 3. Notwithstanding the requirement that an economic operator shall be established in the Union pursuant to Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, where a manufacturer of a toy cannot be identified or, where the manufacturer is established outside the Union, and where an importer, an authorised representative and a fulfilment service provider cannot be identified, any provider of online marketplaces that allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders and that is not a manufacturer, importer or distributor, provided that the conditions of Article 6(3) set out in Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 are fulfilled, shall be required by market surveillance authorities to provide adequate and proportionate remedies to consumers where: (a) a market surveillance authority, upon a reasoned request, asks that provider of online marketplace to identify the economic operator or the person who supplied the provider of online marketplace with the toy; and (b) the provider of online marketplace fails to identify the economic operator or the person who supplied the provider of online marketplace with the product within 1 month of receiving the request. 4. Notwithstanding the requirement that an economic operator shall be established in the Union pursuant to Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, where a manufacturer of a toy cannot be identified or, where the manufacturer is established outside the Union, and where an importer, an authorised representative and a fulfilment service provider cannot be identified, providers of online marketplaces that allow consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders and that are not manufacturers, importers or distributors, shall be required by market surveillance authorities to provide adequate and proportionate remedies to consumers where such providers fail to comply with Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 285 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) state that compliance of the toy with the requirements set out in Union legislation applicable to toys and in particular in this Regulation and, in particular, the essential safety requirements, has been demonstrated;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 289 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) be accessible to consumers or other end-users, market surveillance authorities, customs authorities, notified bodies, civil society organisations, researchers, trade unions, the Commission and other economic operators;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 291 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) be available for a period of at least the expected lifetime or 10 years after the last model of toy is placed on the market, whichever is longer, also in cases of insolvency, a liquidation or a cessation of activity in the Union of the economic operator that created the product passport;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(g a) be based on open standards, developed with an inter-operable format and shall be machine-readable, structured, searchable, and shall be transferable through an open interoperable data exchange network without vendor lock-in, in accordance with the essential requirements set out in the Ecodesign Regulation;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) fulfil the specific and technical requirements laid down pursuant to paragraph 10. in order to facilitate the verification of product compliance by competent national authorities;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. By creating the product passport, the manufacturer shall assume responsibility for the compliance of the toy with this Regulation and with any other Union legislation applicable to toys.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 297 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. The data carrier shall be physically present on the toy or on a label attached to the toy, in accordance with the implementing act adopted in accordance with paragraph 10. In the case of small toys and toys consisting of small parts, the data carrier may alternatively be affixed to its packaging. It shall be clearly visible to the consumer before any purchase and to market surveillance authorities, including in cases where the toy is made available through distance sales. In addition, the data carrier shall be accompanied by the statement ‘More information on the product is available online’ or by a similar statement.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 299 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The economic operator placing the toy on the market shall provide other economic operators involved in the distribution of the toy with a digital copy of the data carrier to allow them to make it accessible to consumers and market surveillance authorities where they cannot physically access the product. The economic operator shall provide that digital copy free of charge and within 5 working days of receiving a request.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 301 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 8
8. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, point (c), where information requirements relating to substances of concern in toys are established in a delegated act adopted in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation …/… [OP please insert: the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation], the information referred to in Part I, point (k), of Annex VI to this Regulation is no longer required insofar as the information requirements established in the delegated act are equivalent.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 306 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) the actors that shall have access to information in the product passport and to what information they shall have access and the actors that may introduce or update the information in the product passport, including where needed the creation of a new passport, including manufacturers, importers and distributors, dealers, repairers, refurbishers, remanufacturers, recyclers, notified bodies, competent national authorities, public interest organisations and the Commission, or any organisation acting on their behalf, and the types of information they may introduce or update.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 307 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) the period for which the product passport shall remain available by specifying the minimum period of time during which the actors of the value chain storing the data shall guarantee continuous availability of those data.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Product passports shall be designed and operated so that they are user-friendly and accessible.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Consumers shall not be requested to register, download or install applications, or to provide a password to access the product passport. A functionality shall allow consumers to place alerts about toys that present a risk to their health and safety through a separate section of the Safety Gate Portal pursuant to article 34 (3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/988.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 316 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Manufacturers shall provide, on oral or written demand or when the product passport is temporarily unavailable at the time of purchase of the toy, the information provided in the product passport by alternative means on a durable medium. Manufacturers shall provide that information independently of a purchase and free of charge.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
6. Economic operators may not trackand any other relevant natural or legal person shall not track or profile end-users or otherwise process any personal data in line with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, analyse or use any usage information for purposes other than what is absolutely and strictly necessary for providing the information on the product passport online. End-users must not be required to install any software, register or otherwise process personal data to access the digital product passport online.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 321 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The rights to access and to introduce, modify or update information in product passport shall be restricted based on the access rights specified in delegated acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 10 of Article 17.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 322 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Data authentication, reliability and integrity shall be ensured.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 323 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. The product passport shall be designed and operated so that a high level of security and privacy is ensured and fraud is avoided.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 325 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. To make controls more efficient, the registry should be automatically accessible from other data sharing platforms used by authorities, such as customs IT systems.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5
5. The verifications referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article shall take place electronically and automatically using the interconnection between the registry referred to in Article 19(1) and the EU Customs Single Window Certificates Exchange System referred to in [Article 13 of [P.O. insert serial number for Regulation (EU) …/… on Ecodesign Requirements for Sustainable Products]] and any future customs IT systems.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 330 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) cover all the chemical, physical, mechanical, electrical, cybersecurity, flammability, hygiene and radioactivity hazards and the potential exposure to such hazards;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) assess the risks, including to mental health, that may emerge when the toy is used in accordance with its intended purpose and reasonably foreseeable use.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. In the following cases, the manufacturer shall use the EU-type examination procedure set out in Part II of Annex IV together with the conformity to type procedure set out in Part III of that Annex and, where applicable, a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level ‘high’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/881:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 339 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Manufacturers shall use the EU- type examination procedure set out in Part II of Annex IV together with the conformity to type procedure set out in Part III of that Annex and, where applicable, a European cybersecurity certification scheme at assurance level ‘high’ pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/881, for toys for children under 36 months, toys which include artificial intelligence, internet-connected toys, toys which are chemical mixtures, toys which for functional reasons cannot be designed to eliminate all risks and toys which in case of a failure can lead to severe health consequences for children. The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 46 (5 a new) to amend this list, also contained in Anne IV, after consulting the stakeholders concerned, in the light of technical progress, advances in knowledge or new scientific evidence, by adding to the list of toys a new category of toys or by withdrawing an existing category of toys from this list.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 341 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The technical documentation shall contain all relevant data or details of the means used by the manufacturer to ensure that the toy complies with the essential safety requirements. It shall, in particular, contain the documents listed in Annex V. In case the toy or any part of it complies with European standards or common specifications, the list of the relevant European standards and common specifications shall also be indicated.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 342 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The technical documentation shall be drawn up and kept up-to-date by the manufacturer in one of the official languages of the Union.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 351 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. When market surveillance authorities of the Member States take measures as provided for in this Regulation, they shall take due account of the precautionary principle.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 354 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where the market surveillance authorities of one Member State have sufficient reason to believe that a toy covered by this Regulation presents a risk to the health or safety of persons, they shall carry out an evaluation in relation to the toy concerned covering all the requirements laid down in this Regulation. The relevant economic operators and providers of online marketplaces shall cooperate, as necessary, with the market surveillance authorities for that purpose.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 356 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(c a) shortcomings in the EU-type examination procedure referred to in Article 22;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the protection of health and safety of children and other persons, the Commission shall adopt an immediately applicable implementing act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 50.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 359 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where, on completion of the procedure set out in Article 41(3) and (4) and in Article 44 (2) and (2a new), objections are raised against a measure taken by a Member State, or where the Commission has reasons to believe that a national measure could be contrary to Union legislation, the Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measure.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 360 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Article 41, where a market surveillance authority makes, inter alia, one of the following findings with regard to a toy, it shall require the relevant economic operator to put an end to the non-compliance concerned:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 363 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) the toy is not in conformity with the product requirements in accordance with Article 5;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 364 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) the toy does not bear, where appropriate, a general warning in accordance with Article 6;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 365 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(e c) the conformity assessment procedures laid down in Article 22 are not fulfilled;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. Where, having carried out an evaluation under Article 41(1), a market surveillance authority finds that, although a toy made available on the market is in compliance with the particular safety requirements it poses a risk to the health and safety of persons, it shall require the relevant economic operator, including providers of online marketplaces, to take all appropriate measures, within a reasonable period of time prescribed by the market surveillance authority taking into account the nature of the risk to ensure that the toy, when made available on the market, no longer presents that risk, to withdraw the toy from the market or to recall it.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 368 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where the relevant economic operator does not take adequate corrective actions within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the market surveillance authorities shall take appropriate provisional measures to prohibit or restrict the toy being made available on their national market, to withdraw the toy from that market or to recall it.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 371 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 a (new)
Article45a Pan-European Injury Database 1. A Pan-European Injury Database covering all types of injuries caused by toys shall be set up and coordinated by the European Commission. 2. The relevant market surveillance authorities established by the Member States shall contribute to the establishment of the database and deliver injury data to the database, based on a common methodology, comprehensive and in accordance with European and national laws on data protection. 3. The Commission shall support the co- ordination of the collection of data from Member States and the operation of the database.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 373 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 47 to amend Article 22 (4 a new) by adding to the list of toys that are required to comply with the EU-type examination procedure set out in Annex IV a new category of toys or by withdrawing an existing category of toys from that list.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 374 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 47 to amend Part C of the Appendix to Annex II in order to permit for a specified period of time a certain use in toys of a specific substance or mixture that is prohibited under Part III, point 4, of Annex II, or to limit a certain use that has been permitted.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 375 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 9
9. For the purposes of paragraphs 6, 7 and 78, the Commission shall systematically and regularly evaluate the occurrence of hazardous chemical substances or mixtures in toys. In those evaluations, the Commission shall take into account reports of market surveillance bodies and scientific evidence presented by Member States and stakeholders.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 379 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 4
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult relevant stakeholders and experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 381 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Competent national authorities, notified bodies, ECHA and the Commission shall respect the confidentiality of the following information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks in accordance with this Regulation:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 383 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and shall be increased if the relevant economic operator has previously committed infringements of this Regulation .. Member States by … [P.O. insert date: the first day of the month following 30 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] notify the Commission of those rules and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. Toys placed on the market in conformity with Directive 2009/48/EC before … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 3018 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] may continue to be made available on the market until … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 4230 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 395 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. By … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 60 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the main findingsOn request, Member States shall provide the Commission with information necessary for the evaluation of this Regulation. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the main findings and draw up a summary that is made available to the public. The report shall assess whether this Regulation, and in particular the provisions in Chapter IV achieved the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of health and safety of children and other persons and shall assess the possibility to include adaptive toys in the scope of this Regulation.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 403 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 3
3. sports equipment, including roller skates, inline skates, and skateboards, scooters and other means of transport intended for children with a body mass of more than 20 kg;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 406 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 5
5. scooters and other means of transport designed for sport or which are intended to be used for travel on public roads or public pathways;deleted
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 407 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 8
8. puzzles with more than 500 pieces;deleted
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 409 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 14
14. electronic equipment, such as personal computers and game consoles, used to access interactive software and their associated peripherals or components, unless the electronic equipment or the associated peripherals are specifically designed for and targeted at children and have a play value on their own, such as specially designed personal computers, key boards, joy sticks or steering wheels;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part I – point 9
9. Toys shall be designed and manufactured in such a way, in terms of the maximum values for impulse noise and continuous noise, that the sound from them is not able to impair children’s hearing. The maximum values shall not exceed those set in Directive 2003/10/EEC.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 419 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part II – point 2 – point a – point 5
(5) hazard classes 3.9, 3.10 and 3.101;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 420 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part II – point 2 – point a – point 6
(6) hazard class 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4;
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 428 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part VI a (new)
VI a Part VIa Cybersecurity 1. Toys shall be designed, developed, and produced and, where applicable, updated, in such a way that they ensure a level of cybersecurity protection proportionate to the risks to health and safety of children that can be caused by a cybersecurity incident. Toys shall be designed and manufactured so as to eliminate cybersecurity incidents or reduce the associated risks by an inherent security, taking into account the intended use or reasonably foreseen misuse, any risk of adverse impact to the health and safety of its users bearing in mind the behaviour of children. 2. Toys shall comply with the relevant Union legislation relating to cybersecurity. In particular, toys shall comply with the specific cybersecurity requirements set out in Annex I of the Regulation XX/XX on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 (Cyber Resilience Act).
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part A – point 2
2. Nitrosamines and nitrosable substances are prohibited in toys intended for use by children under 36 months or in other toys intended to be placed in the mouth where the migration of those substances is equal to or higher than. The migration of those substances from toys, components of toys or micro-structurally distinct parts of toys, shall not exceed 0,01 mg/kg for nitrosamines and 0,1 mg/kg for nitrosable substances.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part A – point 4 – introductory part
4. Toys shall not contain the following fragrance allergens unless their presence in the toy is technically unavoidable under good manufacturing practice and does not exceed 100 mg/kgthe limit of detection:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 436 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part B – point 1
[...]deleted
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 438 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
All wWarnings shall have the following characteristics: a) they shall stand out clearly from the background; b) a single font shall be used that is easily legible and without serifs; c) the x-height of the font size shall be equal to or greater than 1,4 mm; d) the distance between two lines shall be appropriate for the selected font size to be easily legible; e) the letter spacing shall be appropriate for the selected font to be easily legible. All warnings shall be preceded by the word ‘Warning’ or, alternatively, by a generic pictogram such as the following pictogram:
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 444 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part I – point 4 – point 4.2
4.2. The manufacturer shall draw up the product passport for a toy model and ensure that together with the technical documentation, it remains available for at least the expected lifetime of 10 years after the last model of the product has been placed on the market, whichever is longer. The product passport shall identify the toy for which it has been drawn up.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 446 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part II – point 9
9. The manufacturer shall keep a copy of the EU-type examination certificate, its annexes and additions together with the technical documentation at the disposal of the national authorities for at least 10 years after the last model of toy has been placed on the market.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 447 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part II a (new)
II a Part II - Module B (a new): Toys required to undergo the EU-type examination procedure 1. Toys for children under 36 months; 2. Toys which include artificial intelligence; 3. Internet-connected toys; 4. Toys which are chemical mixtures; 5. Toys which for functional reasons cannot be designed to eliminate all risks; 6. Toys which in case of a failure can lead to severe health consequences for children.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 449 #

2023/0290(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part III – point 3 – point 3.2
3.2. The manufacturer shall create a product passport for a toy model and ensure that it remains available for at least the expected lifetime or 10 years after the last model of toy has been placed on the market, whichever is longer. The product passport shall identify the toy for which it has been drawn up.
2023/12/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2022 on the Future of EU international investment policy,
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 9 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the Paris Agreement of 2015,
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 10 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 b (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on Biological diversity and its Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework of 2022,
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 18 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the modernised EU-Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (‘the Agreement’) has the potential to considerably strengthen cooperation between Chile and the EU and extend it to new areas, promoting common values and principles;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 24 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EU is Chile’s third largest trading partner and its largest source of foreign direct investment; whereas the EU and Chile share a commitment to promoting an open, sustainable, rules- and values-based multilateral trading system with the World Trade Organization (WTO) at its core; whereas according to the SIA, the EU largest gains in value-added are in the machinery and automotive sectors, while Chile’s main export gains will come from a handful of goods sectors such as vegetables, fruits and nuts, beverages and tobacco;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 28 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the EU has reformed investment protection provisions, replaced ISDS with the investment court system (ICS) and launched multilateral negotiations for an investment court, which are significant steps in the right direction for a modernised and sustainable investment policy; whereas much more remains to be done to advance this reform agenda, notably with regard to substantive rights and obligations for investors; whereas the ICS will replace the old bilateral investment protection treaties that Chile has concluded with 16 EU Member states;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 30 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas Chile is one of the world’s most open economies and depends strongly on international trade; whereas over the past decades, export-oriented agriculture has progressively increased and this trend has gone hand in hand with a decrease of local family farming; whereas agriculture and mining are key sectors for the Chilean economy and their expansion as a result of the trade agreement could further push the asymmetries between the EU's and the Chilean economies and lead to increased environmental pressure especially on fresh water, ecosystems, local communities and smallholder farms; whereas these risks must be carefully addressed and closely monitored;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 36 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas Chile is the EU’s main lithium provider and already now there is a zero tariff on trade in lithium products between the EU and Chile; whereas most of the expected gains for the EU in this sector will come from new disciplines such as investment protection, the prohibition of export and import monopolies, the restriction of dual prices and the elimination of export restrictions to the EU; whereas it is in the interest of both Chile and the EU to foster Chile’s ability to build up its own domestic industrial capacity in this sector, in particular by generating value added through the domestic processing and transformation of raw materials;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 38 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas according to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), out of all South American countries, Chile experienced by far the worst increase in drought severity between 2010 and 2019; whereas increased mining and extractive activities, in particular in the lithium sector, will most likely affect the availability and quality of fresh water for local communities;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 42 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the EU’s approach to TSD chapters aims at making the respect of ILO core labour rights and of the Paris Agreement essential elements of trade agreements;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 43 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
D c. whereas trade and investment policies should contribute to raising social, environmental and animal welfare standards and ensure full respect for fundamental rights, particularly local communities and indigenous peoples’ rights, the right to adequate food and the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 46 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the geopolitical significance of strong bi-regional relations between the EU and the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, and the political importance of robust bilateral relations between the EU and Chile based onthat promote the highest social and environmental standards including through the modernisation of the association agreement, among others;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 52 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the EU’s strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean needs to be implemented swiftly based on joint priorities; highlights the importance of joining forces with CELAC countries to promote peace and security, democracy, the rule of law and human rights, as well as to tackle global challenges such as climate change, the biodiversity crisis, gender based violence and corruption;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 63 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the 2002 EU-Chile Association Agreement has been a success story, as it provides a clear legal framework for regular dialogues and allows discussion on many areas of common interest;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 65 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the Agreement contains robust provisions on democratic principles, human rights and the rule of law, as well as a commitment to prot; notes nevertheless the lack of concrete provisions that enable indigenous peoples and local communities to be consulted in accordance with the ILO convention 169 on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; urges for the full respect of the rights ofFree, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of local communities and indigenous peoples;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 69 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Highlights that the Advanced Framework Agreement will be implemented in complex social contexts; stresses, in this regard, that the role of human rights defenders and whistle- blowers, among others, is crucial and needs to be protected;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 81 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Regrets the lack of binding commitments or mandatory actions with regard to part II: Political dialogue and sectoral cooperation; reiterates the need to have a coherent general architecture linking the different parts of the agreement in order to ensure the enforceability of the human rights commitments;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 88 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Welcomes that the TRQs for beef and sheep no longer include an automatic annual increase, as this is now replaced by a fixed amount that will ensure a more stable and clearly limited market access for Chilean meat products in the future; regrets that there has been no inclusion of animal welfare and environmental conditions to be applied to specific market concessions, as was done in the Agreement with New Zealand in excluding import of meat from intensive feedlot systems; stresses the importance of making trade concessions conditional on meeting production standards equal to those in the EU; calls for the inclusion of animal welfare and environmental conditions to be applied to future or revised trade concessions;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 92 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Welcomes the commitment of the Parties to phase out antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production and urges the Parties to develop joint action plans towards that aim;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 97 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the inclusion of a stand- alone dedicated chapter on trade and gender, the first of its kind in an EU trade agreement, which includes a number of binding commitments to eliminate discrimination against women, promote women’s economic empowerment and ensure that international trade benefits all; expects the Commission to build on this precedent in all future trade negotiations; notes however that these commitments are not legally enforceable as there are no legal consequences in the event of breach of its provisions;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 101 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines the relevance of cooperating in the area of sustainable food systems; welcomes the new stand-alone chapter on Sustainable Food Systems, in which the EU and Chile agree on a range of cooperation priorities on aspects such as antibiotics, animal welfare, the sustainability of the food chain and on pesticides; regrets, however, that the ambition falls short of the Farm to Fork Strategy and remains focused on cooperation; calls on both parties to develop an ambitious cooperation plan on sustainable food systems aiming to ensure that the trade agreement does not contradict a strategy towards sustainable home-grown fruit and vegetables, promoting healthy quality food and regenerative agricultural practices; considers that cooperation on SFS is an opportunity to make effective progress on the commitments set in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas and agriculture-oriented ILO Conventions such as C129 on labour inspection in agriculture, C010 on minimum age in agriculture and C011 on the right of association in agriculture;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 111 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises that the provisions on investment liberalisation and investment protection willshould further boost investment in both directions by guaranteeing that investors from both sides will be granted fair and non-discriminatory treatment; stresses that these provisions are fully aligned with the EU’s reformed approach on investment protectionclosely follow the EU’s reformed approach on investment protection, which includes the creation of a fixed roster of arbitrators, an appeal mechanism, a code of conduct for arbitrators and improved transparency in arbitration proceedings; regrets however that the protection standards for investors contain the commitments to “fair and equitable treatment” and “indirect expropriation”, hence well beyond non- discrimination, which still allow a large margin of interpretation to arbitrators and risk damaging the legitimate right to regulate for public authorities; highlights that the ICS still constitutes international arbitration and stresses that, unlike in national courts, arbitrators on the ICS roster would have discretion not to necessarily take into consideration relevant public interest laws when interpreting the substantive provisions enshrined in IIAs; regrets that arbitrators would still be paid on a case-by-case basis;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 114 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Regrets that the scope of the “covered investment” concept remains very broad and, contrary to other recent Investment protection chapters such as the one negotiated with Canada, protects speculative investments such as futures, options and other derivatives and short term investments, such as portfolio investments, that do not necessarily involve substantial presence of the investor in Chile;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 116 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. Stresses that global efforts to combat climate change will require a rapid transition to renewable energy and fast government action to reduce reliance on fossil fuels; urges the Parties to ensure alignment of Investment protection provisions with environmental policies, labour rights and human rights; Regrets that the Agreement allows protection for investments in fossil fuels and in other economic activities that are harmful to the environment according to the EU legislative framework;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 120 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights that the Agreement preservescontains provisions dealing with the right of governments to regulate in the public interest, for example in order to protect public health, consumers or the environment; underlines, however, that these provisions do not prevent states from having to comply with obligations established under the investment protection chapter, nor do they preclude investment claims or damages following the exercising of that right; is concerned that policy decision-making might therefore be delayed or decisions watered down;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 123 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Emphasises that EU and Chilean companies will be able to benefit from improved access to public procurement markets for goods, services and work at (sub-)central level; highlights the enhanced transparency requirements; stresses the need to take into account environmental and social considerations throughout the procurement procedure;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 126 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Regrets that patent protection periods established in the Intellectual property Rights chapter go beyond WTO requirements and could have negative impact in terms of access to affordable medicines;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 130 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Highlights that Chile has the potential to play a major role in the global green and just transitions, that should equally benefit the development of its own industrial capacities along with high social and environmental standards; notes that the development and scaling up of the Chilean renewable energy sector will require massivesufficient policy space and massive predictable and sustainable development- oriented investments, including from EU companies; welcomes the creation of a European initiative for the development of renewable hydrogen in Chile;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 132 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Emphasises Chile’s leading role as a major supplier of critical raw materials, including those that are essential for the green and digital transitions, such as lithium and copper; stresses that the Agreement will ensure non-discriminatory access of EU companies to Chilean raw materials, while; notes with concern that the provisions dealing with dual pricing and export monopoly restrictions do not leavinge sufficient policy space for Chile to create local added value; believes that the EU should and develop further its local industrial capacity in order to move away from its current role of raw material supplier; regrets that current lithium mining projects do not require the involvement or consultation of indigenous populations, which is not in line with ILO convention 169 on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the UN Free Prior and Informed Consent Principle and calls on the parties to recognise and fully respect these rights throughout the Agreement; calls on the EU to actively support Chile in its efforts to move up the value chain; is convinced that the exploitation of raw materials should go hand in hand with efforts to reduce energy use, should be carried out in an environmentally and socially sustainable manner, and that it should benefit local communities, including indigenous communities; in this regard, calls on the Parties to swiftly develop a roadmap, involving Chilean civil society and local communities, with the aim of minimising and mitigating the negative impact of the mining sector on the environment, in particular on water and biodiversity, and on access to land and public health for local communities and indigenous peoples;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 139 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the factNotes that the chapter on trade and sustainable development (TSD) contains ambitious and binding commitments on environmental and labour standards that are outcome oriented; regrets however that the core ILO conventions and the Paris Agreement are not essential elements of the Agreement, as these are not subject to the general dispute settlement mechanism; regrets that the TSD chapter does not include any obligation to refrain from any action or omission which materially defeats the object and purpose of the Paris Agreement; notes that in their joint statement on trade and sustainable development attached to the Agreement, the EU and Chile commit to reviewing the Agreement’s TSD provisions upon itsthe entry into force of the interim trade agreement;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 148 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Welcomes the inclusion of the rights of indigenous peoples under the TSD chapter; notes that ILO Convention No 169 is but regrets that this provision is not legally enforceable; regrets that ILO Convention No 169 and the UN Free Prior and informed consent principle enshrined in the UN Declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) are not explicitly mentioned; acknowledges that this convention isand the UN Declaration are key for upholding the rights of indigenous peoples in Chile and the EU when it comes to our trade relations; stresses the importance of abiding by ILO Convention No 169 and UNDRIP; stresses that the provisions of the TSD chapter in relation to Biological diversity and in particular on the preservation of indigenous and local communities practices and knowledge and on the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources in consistency with the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity should guide the interpretation of the IPR chapter of the Agreement;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 151 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Notes that in the joint statement, both sides commit to considering the possibility of including the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as an essential element of the Agreement in the context of the review of the TSD provisions, as well as the provisions on investment protection; expects the TSD review to make the TSD chapter subject to the general dispute settlement chapter; calls on the Parties to implement such review as soon as possible in the framework of the interim FTA; calls on both Parties to review the Investment protection provisions in line with Parliament recommendations in its “Future of EU international investment” report;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 152 #

2023/0260R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Welcomes an institutionalised mechanism for involving civil society organisations in the implementation of the Agreement; calls on the Commission and on the Chilean authorities to ensure the active and meaningful involvement of civil society, including NGOs and indigenous representatives, in the monitoring of the Agreement’s implementation; calls on the Commission to evaluate the functioning of DAGs in EU trade Agreements already in place in the region in order to identify shortcomings in this regard and take necessary measures to correct them;
2023/11/23
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 141 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Certain definitions set out in Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 should be adapted to take account of the broader scope of this Regulation, to align them with those set out in other Union acts, and to clarify terminology having different meanings in different sectors. New definitions should be included in customs legislation to clarify the roles and responsibilities of certain actors in the customs processes. In the case of the importer and the exporter, new definitions should make those persons liableresponsible towards customs for compliance of the goods, including for financial and non- financial risks, in order to strengthen customs supervision. In the case of the new concept of deemed importer, new definitions should ensure that in some cases, in the context of an online sale from outside the Union, an economic operator, as opposed to the consumer, is considered the importer and assumes the corresponding responsibilities. New definitions should also be introduced in relation to the broader scope of the provisions of customs supervision, risk management and customs controls.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Beyond their traditional role of collecting customs duties, VAT and excise and applying customs legislation, customs authorities also play a critical role in enforcing other Union and, where applicable, other national legislation on customs matters. A definition of this ‘other legislation applied by the customs authorities’ should be introduced in order to build an effective framework for regulating the application and supervision of these particular requirements on goods. Such prohibitions and restrictions can be justified on grounds of, inter alia, public morality, public policy or public security, the protection of the health and life of humans, animals or plants, the protection of the environment, the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value and the protection of industrial or commercial property and other public interests, including controls on drug precursors, goods infringing certain intellectual property rights and cash. The notion of other legislation applied by the customs authorities should also include commercial policy measures and fishery conservation and management measures, as well as restrictive measures adopted on the basis of Article 215 TFEU. Divergences in the national lists of prohibition and restrictions create significant difficulties for entities importing in multiple Member States. In order to facilitate trade and the functioning of customs, the EU should work to gradually harmonise national lists of prohibitions and restrictions. Furthermore, harmonised definitions of the legal terms used in providing for prohibitions and restrictions should be adopted, in order to avoid diverging interpretations by Member States.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The consequence of the failure of a customs authority to take a decision upon application within the established time- limits should be clarified. The principle that in such case the application is deemed to be subject to a negative decision and that the applicant may lodge an appeal, in accordance with the general rule on customs decisions should also be established. In order to ensure that trade is not paralysed in case of large-scale failure of the centralised electronic systems, the Commission and the EU Customs agency should work with Member States on fall-back procedures.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Economic operators meeting certain criteria and conditions to be considered compliant and trustworthy traders by customs authorities can be granted the status of AEO and thereby benefit from facilitations in customs processes. While ensuring that the traders dealing with most of Union trade are trustworthy, the AEO scheme suffers from certain weaknesses highlighted in the evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and in the findings of the European Court of Auditors. To deal with those concerns, in particular about the divergent national practices and challenges regarding AEO compliance monitoring, the rules should be amended to introduce the customs authorities’ obligation to monitor compliance at least every 32 years.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The changes in the customs processes and the way of operating the customs authorities requires a new partnership with economic operators, that is the Trust and Check traders scheme. The criteria and conditions to become a Trust and Check trader should build on the AEO criteria but should also ensure that the trader is considered transparent for the customs authorities. It is therefore appropriate to require Trust and Check operators to grant the customs authorities real timeaccess to relevant data intheir electronic systems keeping record of their compliance and the movement of their goods.For small and medium size economic operators willing to obtain the Trust and Check status but for whom the transmission of real time data might be a disproportionate requirement, the presence of a Digital Product Passport containing all information about a product's compliance can also be used to show transparency. The transparency should be accompanied by certain benefits, notably the possibility to release the goods on behalf of customs without the necessity for their active intervention, except where a pre-release approval is required by other legislation applied by the customs authorities and to defer the payment of the customs debt. As this mode of working should progressively replace the one based on customs declarations, it is appropriate to establish the customs authorities’ obligation to reassess the existing authorisations for AEO for customs simplifications until the end of the transition period.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The changes in the customs processes also require clarifying the role of customs representatives. Both direct and indirect representation should continue to be possible but it should be clarified that the indirect representative of an importer or an exporter assumes all the obligations of importers or exporters, not only the obligation to pay or guarantee the customs debt but also the respect of other legislation applied by the customs authorities. For that reason, customs representatives must be resident in the customs territory of the Union where they represent importers or exporters, to ensure proper accountability for financial and non-financial aspects. The use of an indirect customs representative established in the Union is therefore an available and proportionate alternative for importers and exporters who do not have a commercial presence in the Union. Moreover, customs representatives established in third countries can continue providing their services in the Union where they represent persons who are not required to be established within the customs territory of the Union. Identifying reliable customs representatives is a challenge for economic operators, especially SMEs. To address this issue, it is appropriate for the Commission and the EU Customs Authority to create and maintain a voluntary register of experienced customs representatives having the required qualifications. Such a register would complement existing ones maintained by some Member States;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 155 #

2023/0156(COD)


Recital 23 Proposal for a regulation
(23) The data submitted to the EU Custom Data Hub is to a large extent non- personal data submitted by economic operators of the goods they are trading with. Nevertheless, the data will also include personal data, in particular names of individuals acting for an economic operator or an authority. To ensure that personal data and sensitive commercial information are equally protected, it is appropriate that specific access rules, rules for confidentiality and conditions for the use of the EU Customs Data Hub are established by this Regulation. Without prejudice to the protection of confidential business information, those rules should not prevent the disclosure of non-personal data after access to information requests. In particular, it should be established which entities may access or process data stored or otherwise available in the EU Customs Data Hub, in addition to the persons, the Commission, the customs authorities and the EU Customs Authority, balancing the needs of these entities with , the general interest andthe need ensure that the personal and confidential data collected for customs purposes are used for additional purposes only to the minimum extent necessary.in a proportionate manner, and consistently with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive EU 2016/943
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) To ensure that the European Anti- Fraud Office (‘OLAF’) can exercise its investigations powers in relation to fraudulent activities that are affecting the interests of the Union, it is appropriate that it has access to data from the EU Customs Data Hub that is very similar to the access by the Commission. OLAF should therefore be entitled to process the data in accordance with the conditions relating to data protection in the relevant Union legislation, including Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council47 and Council Regulation (EC) No 515/9748 . To ensure that EPPO can conduct its investigations on customs-related matters, it should be entitled to request access to theaccess and process data in the EU Customs Data Hub. To preserve the functions that are performed in Member States’ national IT systems, the tax authorities of the Member States should either obtain the possibility to process data directly within the EU Customs Data Hub or to extract data from the EU Customs Data Hub and process it through different means. As such, authorities responsible for food safety in accordance with Regulation Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council49 and the authorities responsible for market surveillance in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should be provided with the right services and tools in the EU Customs Data Hub so that they can use the relevant customs data to contribute to enforcing the relevant Union legislation and for cooperating with customs authorities to minimise the risks that non- compliant products enter the Union. It is appropriate that Europol has access upon request to data in the EU Customs Data Hub to be able to perform its tasks as specified in Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council50 . All other Union and national bodies and authorities, including the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), should have access to non- personal data contained in the EU Customs Data Hub. _________________ 47 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18.9.2013, p. 1). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters (OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, p. 1). 49 Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation)(OJ L 95, 7.4.2017, p. 1). 50 Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53).
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The Commission should lay down the modalities for access of all these authorities in implementing rules, after assessing the existing safeguards that each authority or category of authorities has in place for ensuring the correct treatment of personal and commercially sensitive data, while taking into account that publishing non-sensitive customs data can be in the general interest.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) It is appropriate that the EU Customs Data Hubs stores personal data for a maximum period of 10 years. This period is justified in light of the possibility for customs authorities to notify the customs debt up to 10 years after having received the necessary information about a consignment, as well as to ensure that the Commission, the EU Customs Authority, OLAF, EPPO, customs and authorities other than customs can cross-check the information in the EU Customs Data Hub against the information stored in and exchanged with other systems. Moreover, this period of time should be aligned with the storage period required by other legislation applied by the customs authorities, where such legislation is relevant for customs controls. It is also appropriate that whenever personal data is required for the purposes of judicial and administrative proceedings, investigations and during post-clearance controls, the retention period is suspended to avoid that personal data is erased and cannot be used for those purposes.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) A Union-level customs risk management layer is fundamental for ensuring a harmonised application of customs controls in Member States. There is currently a common risk management framework comprising the possibility of identifying common priority controls areas and common risk criteria and standards in the financial risk arena for carrying out customs controls, but it has significant shortcomings. In order to address the lack of harmonised application of customs controls and of harmonised risk management harming the financial and non-financial interests of the Union and of the Member States, it is appropriate to revise the rules to establish a more solid risk management approach addressing both financial and non-financial risks. This includes tackling the structural challenges on the risk management of financial risks identified by the European Court of Auditors. In particular, it is appropriate to describe which activities are comprised in customs risk management, in a cyclical approach. It is also important to identify the roles and responsibilities of the Commission, the EU Customs Authority and the customs authorities of the Member States. It is also essential to provide that the Commission may establish common priority controls areas and common risk criteria and standards, and may identify specific areas in the domain of other legislation applied by the customs authorities that deserve priority for common risk management and controls, without compromising security. This requires close collaboration with competent authorities enforcing other legislation applied by customs, with a specific focus on collaboration with market surveillance authorities.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) It is therefore appropriate to introduce Union-level risk management activities and provisions to ensure the collection at Union level of comprehensive data relevant for risk management including results and evaluation of all controls. It provides for common risk analysis and the issue of corresponding Union control recommendations to customs authorities. Those control recommendations should be implemented, or reasons provided as to why they were not applied. The possibility to issue an instruction that goods destined for the Union may not be loaded or transported should also be provided for. The analysis of Union-level risks and threats should be based on constantly updated Union-level data and should identify the measures and controls to be performed at the border crossing points of entry and exit of the Union territory. In the context of cooperation with law enforcement and security authorities in particular, Union- level risk management should, where possible, contribute to and benefit from strategic analyses and threat assessments conducted at Union level, including those carried out by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) to contribute to the efficient and effective prevention of, and the fight against, crime. Serious or repeated infringement of other legislations applied by customs and detected by customs or other competent authorities should have an impact on the risk profile of importers, exporters or deemed importers.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Once the customs authorities have the information necessary for the relevant procedure, based on risk analysis, they should decide whether to perform further controls on the goods, to release them, to refuse or suspend their release or to let the time pass so the goods are considered released. The customs authorities should do so in cooperation with other authorities, where necessary. Accordingly, the customs authorities should refuse the release of the goods where they have evidence that the goods do not comply with applicable legal requirements. Where the customs authorities need to consult other authorities to determine whether or not the goods comply, they should suspend the release at least until the consultation takes place. In these cases, the customs authorities’ subsequent decision on the goods should depend on the other authorities’ reply. To avoid blocking both traders and authorities in the cases in which concluding on compliance requires some time, the customs authorities should have the possibility to release the goods on the condition that the trader continues informing about the location of the goods for a maximum of 15 days. Finally, in order to provide legal certainty to the traders that have provided the information on time without obliging the customs authorities to react to every consignment, the goods that have not been selected for a control after a reasonable period of time should be considered released. The Commission should be entitled to define this period of time in delegated rules, adapting it, where necessary, to the type of traffic or type of border crossing points.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) To the extent that Trust and Check traders provide customs full access to their systems, records and operations and are considered reliable, they should be able to release their goods under the supervision of the customs authorities but without waiting for their intervention. Accordingly, Trust and Check traders should be able to release goods for any entry procedure at receipt at final destination of the goods or for any exit procedure at the place of delivery of the goods. As the Trust and Check traders are considered transparent, the arrival and/or the delivery should be properly recorded in the EU Customs Data Hub. These operators should be obliged to inform the customs authorities where a problem arises so that those authorities can take a final decision on the release. Where the internal controls systems of the Trust and Check traders are robust enough, the customs authorities should be able, in cooperation with other authorities, to authorise the traders to perform certain checks on their own. However, the customs authorities should retain the possibility to control the goods at any time. Repeated or serious infringements to other EU legislation applied by customs by a Trust and Check trader should lead to the loss of the trusted status.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
(56) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the EU Customs Authority. The composition of the Management Board, including the selection of its Chairperson and Deputy- Chairperson, should respect the principles of gender balance, experience and qualification. Given the Union’s exclusive competence on the customs union, and the close link between customs and other policy fields, it is appropriate that its chairperson is elected from among those Commission representatives. In view of the effective and efficient functioning of the EU Customs Authority, the Management Board should, in particular, adopt a Single Programming Document including annual and multiannual programming, carry out its functions relating to the Authority’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Authority, appoint an Executive Director, and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Authority by the Executive Director. The Management Board should be assisted by an Executive Board and a consultative body representing consumer organisations, business associations and other relevant non-state actors.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 176 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) To fulfil their mission, customs authorities cooperate closely and regularly with market surveillance authorities, sanitary and phytosanitary control authorities, law-enforcement bodies, border management authorities, environmental protection bodies, experts on cultural goods, and many other authorities in charge of sectoral policies. Considering the evolution of the single market and the evolving role of customs, the increase in prohibitions and restrictions and e- commerce, it is necessary to structure and reinforce this cooperation at national, Union and international level. Instead of a cooperation focused on individual consignments or specific events along the supply chain, a structured cooperation framework between customs authorities and other authorities responsible for relevant policy areas should be established. Such cooperation framework should include the following aspects: the development of legislation and of policy needs in a specific area, the exchange and analysis of information, the building of overall cooperation strategy in the form of joint supervision strategies and, finally, cooperation on operational implementation, monitoring and controls. The Commission should also facilitate the application of part of the other legislation applied by the customs authorities by drawing a list of Union legislation imposing requirements on goods subject to customs controls aimed at protecting public interests such as human, animal or plants health and life, the consumers and the environment, and organise information sharing about their enforcement. When applicable, records of serious and repeated infringements to other legislations applied by customs should be made available to customs by the relevant competent authorities, and taken into account in European customs risk management processes.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 59
(59) In order to increase clarity and make the cooperation framework between customs and other partner authorities more efficient, a list of services offered by customs authorities should define clearly the possible role of customs in the application of other relevant policies at the borders of the Union. In addition, the application of the cooperation framework should be monitored by the EU Customs Authority. The EU Customs Authority should work closely and cooperate with the Commission, OLAF, other relevant Union agencies and bodies, such as the European Public Prosecutor Office,Europol and Frontex as well as specialised agencies and networks in the respective policy fields, such as the EU Product Compliance Network.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) Despite the fact that customs legislation is harmonised through the Code, Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 only included the obligation for Member States to provide for penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation and required such penalties to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States have, therefore, the choice of customs penalties, which vary greatly across Member States and are subject to evolution over time. A common framework establishing a minimum core of customs infringements and of non-criminal sanctions should be laid down. Such framework is necessary to address the lack of uniform application and the significant divergences between Member States in the application of sanctions against breaches of customs legislation that can lead to a distortion of competition, loopholes and ‘customs shopping’. The framework should be composed of a common list of acts or omissions that should constitute customs infringements in all Member States. In determining the sanction applicable, customs authorities should define if these acts or omissions are committed intentionally or by obvious negligence. The European Commission, Member States and the EU Customs Authority should regularly exchange best practices on audit and sanctions, in order to improve the convergence and coherence of methodologies and application of sanctions. The Commission should regularly assess whether the sanctions applied by Member States are sufficient to reach the objectives of the Union Customs Code, and take appropriate action if necessary.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 181 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) Despite the fact that customs legislation is harmonised through the Code, Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 only included the obligation for Member States to provide for penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation and required such penalties to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States have, therefore, the choice of customs penalties, which vary greatly across Member States and are subject to evolution over time. A common framework establishing a minimum core of customs infringements and of non-criminal sanctions should be laid down. Such framework is necessary to address the lack of uniform application and the significant divergences between Member States in the application of sanctions against breaches of customs legislation that can lead to a distortion of competition, loopholes and ‘customs shopping’. The framework should be composed of a common list of acts or omissions that should constitute customs infringements in all Member States. Non compliance with importer, exporter and deemed-importer obligations should be included in the list of customs infringements. In determining the sanction applicable, customs authorities should define if these acts or omissions are committed intentionally or by obvious negligence.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64
(64) It is also necessary to establish a common minimum core of non-criminal sanctions providing for minimum amounts of pecuniary charges, the possibility of revocation, suspension or amendment of customs authorisations, including for Authorised Economic Operators and Trust and Check traders, as well as the confiscation of the goods. The minimum amounts of pecuniary charges should depend on whether the customs infringement has been committed intentionally or not and whether or not it has an impact on the amount of customs duties and other charges and on prohibitions or restrictions. This minimum common core of non-criminal sanctions should apply without prejudice to the national legal order of Member States, which can instead provide for criminal sanctions. Member States, the European Commission and the EU customs authority should collaborate to gradually increase the coherence of non-criminal sanctions and their application accross the EU.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
(65) The performance of the customs union should be evaluated at least on an annual basis to allow the Commission, with the help of the Member States, to take the appropriate policy orientations. The collection of information from customs authorities should be formalised and deepened, as more comprehensive reporting would improve benchmarking and could help to homogenise practices and assess the impact of customs policy decisions. It is, therefore, appropriate to introduce a legal framework for the evaluation of the performance of the customs union. To allow sufficient granularity of analysis, the performance measurement should be done not only at national level but also at border crossing point level. The EU Customs Authority should support the Commission in the evaluation process by gathering and analysing the data in the EU Customs Data Hub and identifying how customs activities and operations support the achievement of the strategic objectives and priorities of the customs union and contribute to the mission of customs authorities. In particular, the EU Customs Authority should identify key trends, strengths, weaknesses, gaps, and potential risks, and provide recommendations for improvement to the Commission. In the context of cooperation with law enforcement and security authorities in particular, the EU Customs Authority should also participate, from the operational perspective, in strategic analyses and threat assessments conducted at Union level, including those carried out by Europol and Frontex. This evaluation report should be published.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
(74) InFrom January 20329, economic operators may start using, on a voluntary basis, the capabilities of the EU Customs Data Hub. Bby the end ofDecember 20372, the EU Customs Data Hub should be fully developed, and all economic operators shall use it. Trust and Check traders and deemed importers will be supervised by the Member State of their establishment. By derogation and subject to review, operators that are neither Trust and Check traders nor deemed importers will remain under the supervision of the customs authority of the Member State where the goods are physically located. By 31 December 20351, the Commission should evaluate the two supervision models, including as regards their effectiveness for detecting and preventing fraud. The evaluation should also consider indirect taxation aspects. Based on this evaluation, the Commission should be entitled to decide by delegated act whether the two models should continue or whether, in all cases, the customs authority responsible for the place of establishment of the trader should release the goods. The place of incurrence of customs debt should also be regulated in accordance with the determination of the responsible customs authority,
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 –point d
(d) customs provisions contained in international agreements, insofar as they are applicable in the Union;. This includes relevant multilateral environmental agreements to which the EU and the Member States are Party, insofar as they regulate the conformity of goods.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘deemed importer’ means any person involved in the distance sales of goods to be imported from third countries into the customs territory of the Union who i, including persons authorised to use the special scheme laid down in Title XII, Chapter 6, Section 4 of Directive 2006/112/EC;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 57
(57) ‘customs debt’ means the obligation on a person to pay the amount of import or export duty and any other charges which applies to specific goods under the customs legislation in force;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 57 a (new)
(57 a) ‘other charges’ means any fees coming on top of custom duties, VAT, customs formalities fees and courier fees.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 64 a (new)
(64 a) ‘end-customer’ means physical or moral person residing or established in the Union, to whom a product has been made available by a seller or a marketplace.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Where the customs authorities fail to take a decision within the time-limits established in the first, second and third subparagraphs, the applicant may consider the request to have been denied and may appeal such a negative decision. The applicant may also inform the EU Customs Authority that the customs authorities did not take a decision within the relevant time limits. The Commission, the EU Customs Authority and Member States shall agree on a clear process to handle decisions in case of technical failure of centralised EU electronic systems infrastructure, and especially of the data hub, in order to ensure that trade is not paralysed.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 227 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) the absence of serious and repeated infringements to other legislation applied by customs;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(a a) the absence of serious and repeated infringements to other legislation applied by customs
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 244 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – point f – introductory part
(f) having an electronic system providing or making available to the customs authorities real-time allrelevant data on the movement of the goods and the compliance of the person referred to in paragraph 1 with all requirements applicable on those goods, including relating to safety and security and including where relevant sharing in the EU Customs Data Hub:
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(f a) by way of exception to paragraph f and notwithsanding obligations linked to the importer or deemed importer status, Small and Medium Size enterprises may make compliance data available to customs authorities via a Digital Product Passport,
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The customs authorities at least every 32 years shall perform and in-depth monitoring of the Trust and Check trader’s activities and internal records. The Trust and Check trader shall inform the customs authorities of any changes in its corporate structure, ownership, solvency situation, trading models or any other significant changes in its situation and activities. The customs authorities shall re-assess the status of the Trust and Check trader if any of these changes have a significant impact on the Trust and Check status. The customs authorities may suspend this authorisation until a decision on the reassessment is taken.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 251 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Where a Trust and Check trader is suspected of: a. involvement in fraudulent activity in relation to its economic or business activity, b. repeated or serious infringement to other legislation applied by customs; its status shall be suspended.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. The Commission and Member States shall set up a capacity building and best practice sharing support system for SMEs willing to obtain the Trust and Check status;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. [18 months after the entry into force] the Commission shall set up a voluntary system of accreditation for direct and indirect representatives having the expertise necessary to reliably act as direct or indirect representatives;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 278 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) ensure compliance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) XXXX/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures for a high common level of cybersecurity at the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 279 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) enable the customs surveillance of goods and contribute to the enforcement of other legislations applied by customs.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 282 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(h a) enable the exchange of customs information with non-state actors with a general interest purpose;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) for research purposes
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 4 – point h a (new)
(h a) to support the enforcement of other union legislations concerning products entering the internal market
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 288 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6
6. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘EPPO’) may, upon request, ac access and process data, including personal and commercially sensitive data, stored or otherwise available in the EU Customs Data Hub, exclusively andto the extent necessary for carrying out its tasks pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/193966, insofar as the conduct investigated by EPPO concerns customs and under the conditions determined in an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 14 of this Article. _________________ 66 Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (OJ L 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1).
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 12
12. Until the date set out in Article 265(3), the Commission, OLAF, EPPO and the EU Customs Authority once it is established shall, exclusively for the purposes stated in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6, be able to process data, including personal data, from the existing electronic systems for the exchange of information developed by the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 295 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Until the date set out in Artile 265(3), non-personal trade data collected via existing electronic systems shall be accessible to non-state actors, especially researchers, via freedom of information requests.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 298 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 a (new)
Article31a Publication of customs data Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2016/943, Member State customs authorities, or the EU Customs Authority after the date included in Article 265.4, shall publish monthly updates containing non-personal customs data. The information published should include a record of each consignment and when applicable, the related importer, deemed- importer, exporter, consignor, seller, consignee, buyer, declarant, representative, producer/manufacturer, country of destination, region of destination, country of dispatch/export, country of origin, country of preferential origin, description of goods, commodity (Harmonised System/HS) code, volume, value, and declaration date.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 299 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) data subjects who are economic operators which are occasionally involved in activities covered by the customs legislation or by other legislation applied by the customs authorities;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 300 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) data subjects who are economic operators and whose personal information is contained in the supporting documents referred to in Article 40, or in any additional evidence required for the fulfilment of the obligations imposed by customs legislation and other legislation applied by the customs authorities;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 301 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) data subjects who are economic operators and whose personal data is contained in the data collected for risk management purposes pursuant to Article 50(3), point (a);
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 304 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. Where authorities other than customs authorities or, Union bodies or authorities from third countries make use of electronic means established by, used to achieve the objectives of, or referred to in Union legislation, the cooperation may take place by means of interoperability of those electronic means with the EU Customs Data Hub.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. Where authorities other than customs authorities or authorities from third countries do not make use of electronic means established by, used to achieve the objectives of, or referred to in, Union legislation, those authorities may use the specific services and systems of the EU Customs Data Hub in accordance with Article 31.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) collecting, processing, exchanging and analysing relevant data available in the EU Customs Data Hub and from other sources, including relevant data from competent authorities other than customs authorities;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Infringement to other legislation applied by customs and notified by competent authorities to customs authorities shall negatively impact the risk profile of the relevant importers, exporters or deemed importers;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 311 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission mayshall establish common priority control areas and common risk criteria and standards for any type of risk, including but not limited to risks relating to financial interests.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 312 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to paragraph 6, point (f), of this Article and to Article 43, the Commission mayshall identify specific areas in the domain of other legislation applied by the customs authorities that warrant priority treatment for customs risk management and controls.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 313 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission mayshall:
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 4
4. For the purposes referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3, the Commission may collect, process and analyse data available in the EU Customs Data Hub and from other sources, including from authorities other than customs authorities, including from third countries, from the secretariats under relevant Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the customs Advisory Board.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. All risk information, signals, risk analysis results, control recommendations, control decisions and control results, shall be recorded in the operational process to which they relate and in the EU Customs Data Hub, irrespective of whether they were based on national or common risk analysis, or whether they were based on random selection. Customs authorities shall share risk information with each other, with the EU Customs Authority and with the Commission and where applicable, with the secretariats of Multilateral Environmental Agreements, provided that personal data is adequately protected.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 321 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, in cooperation with the EU Customs Authority and the customs authorities, shall evaluate the implementation of risk management in order to continuously improve its operational and strategic effectiveness and efficiency at least once every 2 years; the evaluation shall be publicly accessible; the Commission may in addition arrange evaluation activities to be carried out where it considers necessary, and on an ongoing basis.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 324 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) where they have any evidence that the goods do not comply with the relevant other legislation applied by the customs authorities, unless that legislation requires consulting other authorities beforehand;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) where other legislation applied by customs require consultation with other competent authorities;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 328 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 5 – point b –point ii
(ii) the other authorities have not replied within the time limit determined in the relevant other legislation applied by the customs authorities, ordeleted
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 332 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 5 – point b –point iii
(iii) the other authorities notify the customs authorities that more time is needed to assess whether the goods comply with the relevant other legislation applied by the customs authorities, on the condition that they have not requested to maintain the suspension, and the importer or the exporter provides to the customs authorities full traceability of those goods for 15 days starting from the notification of the other authorities or until the other authorities have assessed and communicated the outcome of their controls to the importer or the exporter, whichever comes first. The customs authorities shall make the traceability available to the other authorities.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 336 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 2
2. The advance cargo information shall include at least the importer responsible for the goods, the unique reference for the consignment, the consignor, the consignee, a description of the goods, the tariff classification, the value, the country of final destination of the goods, the data on the route and the nature and identification of the means of transport bringing the goods and the transportation cost. The advance cargo information shall be provided before the goods arrive to the customs territory of the Union.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 363 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 150 – paragraph 10
10. Where Even ifthe importer has opted to apply the simplified tariff treatment for distance sales, the importer may not benefit from the measures referred to in Article 145(2), points (d) and (e), or from non-tariff preferential measures apply.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 364 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 159 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the information provided or made available for the purpose of the procedures referred to in paragraph 1 leads to all or part of the import duty not being collected, the person who provided that information and who knew, or who ought reasonably to have known, that such information was false shall also be a debtor. That person shall be responsible for the payment of any other charges applicable including custom formalities fees and courier fees
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 159 – paragraph 3
3. Where Title XII, Chapter 6, Section 4 of Directive 2006/112/EC applies to the distance sales of goods to be imported from third countries or territories to an end- customer in the customs territory of the Union, the deemed importer shall incur a customs debt when the payment for the distance sale is accepted and shall be the debtor. The deemed importer shall also be responsible for the payment of any other charges applicable.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 374 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 204 – paragraph 2
2. The EU Customs Authority shall coordinate and supervise the application and implementation of the appropriate measures and arrangements by the customs authorities and shall report back on the results of this implementation to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 382 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 208 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
(j a) cooperate with the secretariats of relevant Multilateral Environmental Agreements to which the EU is party;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 396 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 221 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Section 4 Customs Advisory Board 221a Customs Advisory Board 1.The EU Customs Authority shall estblish a Customs Advisory Board to assist the Executive Board 2.The Customs Advisory Board is tasked to: a) give input on the customs dimensions of other legislation applied by customs; b) communicate recommendations for priority areas of control 3.The Customs Advisory Board (CAB) shall be composed of representatives of civil society organisations, including consumer organisations, employers federation and other relevant stakeholders; 3. The Customs Advisory Board shall hold at least one ordinary meeting every six months. In addition, it shall meet at the request of the EU Customs Authority or Executive Board.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 398 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 228 – paragraph 6
6. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, EPPO mayis responsible for investigate anding, prosecute fraud and other illegal activitiing and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of and accomplices to, criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council77 . ,including offences regarding participation in a criminal organisation and inextricably linked offences, as provided for in Article 22 of that Regulation. _________________ 77 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29).
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 240 – paragraph 1
1. Customs authorities shall cooperate with other authorities at national level, including, but not limited to, market surveillance authorities, sanitary and phytosanitary authorities, law enforcement authorities and tax authorities, in the field other legislation applied by the customs authorities, collection of duties and taxes and other relevant fields of cooperation. Customs authorities shall alert relevant competent authorities of suspected infringement to other EU legislations and add the information in the EU customs data hub. Where appropriate, customs authorities shall also cooperate with relevant bodies, expert groups, agencies, offices or networks coordinating the activities of other authorities at Union level. Where appropriate, customs authorities shall also cooperate with other relevant parties at EU level, as referred to in paragraph 9, and the involved customs authorities shall notify the EU Customs Authority.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 405 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 241 – paragraph 2
2. For this purpose, the EU Customs Authority shall follow the customs policy priorities and ensure the necessary links and coordination with the anti-fraud activities byof OLAF and EPPO and national customs investigations, as well as the criminal investigations of EPPO or other competent national authorities.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 407 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 242 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) alerting other authorities about risks relevant for their work, as well as reporting suspicions of fraud and criminality;
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 413 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 252 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) failure to comply with importer and deemed importer obligations in accordance to article 20 and 21.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 253 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the sanctions laid down in Article 254, Member States may provide for additional sanctions for customs infringements referred to in Article 252 and for all measures necessary to ensure that such sanctions are implemented. Such sanctions shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The European Commission, Member States and the EU Customs Authority shall regularly exchange best practices and applicable methodologies on audit and sanctions calculation, in order to improve the convergence and coherence of sanctions accross the EU. The Commission shall regularly assess whether the sanctions applied by Member States are sufficient to reach the objectives of the described in Article 2, and take appropriate action if necessary.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 421 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 256 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall verify the report and transmit it afterwards to the Member States and the Europan Parliamentfor information.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 426 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 3
3. The functionalities of the EU Customs Data Hub laid down in Article 29 shall be fully operational by 31 December 20372.
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 433 #

2023/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. By 31 December 20351, the Commission shall publish and present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council to assess, in particular:
2023/11/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In order to reduce premature disposal of viable goods purchased by consumers and to encourage consumers to use their goods longer, it is necessary to set out rules on repair of such goods. Repair should result in a more sustainable consumption, respectful of planetary boundaries, since it is likely to generate less waste caused by discarded goods, less demand for resources, including energy, caused by the process of manufacturing and sale of new goods replacing defective goods, as well as less greenhouse gas emissions. This Directive promotes sustainable consumption in view of achieving benefits for the environment while also producing benefits for consumers by avoiding costs associated with new purchases in the short term.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Regulation (EU)… of the European Parliament and of the Council [on the Ecodesign Sustainable Products] lays down, in particular, supply-side requirements pursuing the objective of more sustainable product design at the production phase. Directive (EU)… of the European Parliament and of the Council [on Empowering consumers for the green transition] lays down demand-side requirements ensuring the provision of better information on durability and reparability of goods at the point of sale, which should enable consumers to make informed sustainable purchasing decisions. Requirements should entail, inter alia, the display of a repair score at point of sale to enable consumers to make informed purchase decision, but also measures to ban practices of premature obsolescence at design stage that would prevent goods to be repaired. This Directive complements those supply- side and demand-side requirements, by promoting repair and reuse in the after- sales phase both within and outside the liability of the seller established by Directive (EU) 2019/771. This Directive thus pursues the objectives, in the context of the European Green Deal, of promoting a more sustainable consumption, a circular economy and the green transition.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 79 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Reparability requirements should comprise all requirements under Union legal acts which ensure that goods can be repaired, including but not limited to requirements under the ecodesign framework referred to in Regulation [on the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products], to cover a broad range of products as well as future developments in any other field of Union law.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) A certain number of obstacles prevent consumers from opting for repair, notably unavailability of information on reparability of a product when purchasing a good, lack of information on repair services, lack of access to spare parts, lack of interoperability and similar technical barriers, but above all costs of repair which remain too high. This Directive must therefore ensure that consumers can use effectively their right to repair through the setting of a stable and fair legal framework. This means, inter alia, adopting measures to ensure fair and non-discriminatory access to spare parts, repair and maintenance information, diagnosis tools to all actors of the repair sector as well as banning certain practices that limit repair of goods.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The consumer’s free choice to decide by whom to have its goods repaired should be facilitated by requesting the European Repair Information Form not only from the producer, but also from the seller of the goods concerned or from independent repairers, where applicable. Repairers should provide the European Repair Information Form only where the consumer requests that form and the repairer intends to provide the repair service or it is obliged to repair. A consumer may also choose not to request the European Repair Information Form and to conclude a contract for the provision of repair services with a repairer pursuant to pre-contractual information provided by other means in accordance with Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and the Council.15 __________________ 15 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64–88).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) There are situations in which a repairer incurs costs necessary for providing the information on repair and price included in the European Repair Information Form. For instance,Charging those costs should be limited to cases where the repairer may need to inspect the goods to be able to determine the defect or type of repair that is necessary, including the need for spare parts, and to estimate the repair price. In these cases, a repairer may only request a consumer to pay the costs that are necessary for providing the information included in the European Repair Information Form. Those costs should be deduced from the final price of the repair. In line with the pre- contractual information and other requirements set out in Directive 2011/83/EU, the repairer should inform the consumer about such costs before the consumer requests the provision of the European Repair Information Form. Consumers may refrain from requesting the European Repair Information Form where they consider that the costs for obtaining that form are too high.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Repairers should not alter the conditions of repair that they provide in the European Repair Information Form, including on the price for repair, for a certain period of time30 calendar days. This ensures that consumers are given sufficient time to compare different repair offers. In order to safeguard as much as possible the contractual freedom for repairers other than producers of goods for whom an obligation to repair applies, to be able to decide whether to conclude a contract for the provision of repair services at all, repairers should remain free to decide not to conclude such a contract, including in situations where they have provided the European Repair Information Form. If a contract for the provision of repair services is concluded based on the European Repair Information Form, the information on conditions of repair and price contained in that form should constitute an integral part of the contract for the provision of repair services, thereby defining the repairer’s obligations under that contract. Non- compliance with those contractual obligations is governed by the applicable national law.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Directive (EU) 2019/771 imposes an obligation on sellers to repair goods in the event of a lack of conformity which existed at the time that the goods were delivered and which becomes apparent within the liability period. Under that Directive, consumers are not entitled to have defects repaired which fall outside that obligation. As a consequence, a large number of defective, but otherwise viable, goods are prematurely discarded. In order to encourage consumers to repair their good in such situations, this Directive should impose an obligation on producers to repair goods to which reparability requirements imposed by Union legal acts applyhat fall under the scope of legal acts listed in the Annex II of this Directive. That repair obligation should be imposed, upon the consumer’s request, on the producers of such goods, since they are the addressees of those reparability requirements. That obligation should apply to producers established both inside and outside the Union in relation to goods placed on the Union market.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Since the obligation to repair imposed on producers under this Directive covers defects that are not due to the non- conformity of the goods with a sales contract, producers may provide repair against a price paid by the consumer, against another kind of consideration, or for free. The charging of a price should encourage producers to develop sustainable business models, including the provision of repair services. Such a price mayshould take into account, for instance, labour costs, costs for spare parts, costs for freight and delivery or related costs, costs for operating the repair facility and a customary margin. For cases where those costs cannot be estimated prior to the repair, information on maximum expected price should be delivered to consumers. The price for and the conditions of repair should be agreed in a contract between the consumer and the producer and the consumer should remain free to decide whether that price and those conditions are acceptable. The need for such a contract and the competitive pressure from other repairers should encourage producers who are obliged to repair to keep the price acceptable for the consumer. The repair obligation may also be performed for free when the defect is covered by a commercial guarantee, for instance, in relation to guaranteed durability of goods.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The requirements laid down in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Regulation [on the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products] or implementing measures adopted pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council16 , according to which producers should provide access to spare parts, repair and maintenance information or any repair related software tools, firmware or similar auxiliary means, apply. Those requirements ensure the technical feasibility of repair, not only by the producer, but also by other repairers, including independent ones. As a consequence, the consumer can select a repairer of its choice. In this context, this Directive should ensure that all actors of the repair sector can access spare parts at a reasonable and non-discriminatory price, as well as repair and maintenance information and diagnosis tools necessary to perform the repair, be it hardware of software. __________________ 16 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10–35).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) To avoid overburdening producers and to ensure they are able to perform their obligation to repair, that obligation should be limited to those products for which and to the extent any reparability requirements are provided for in Union legal actsthat fall under the scope of the legal acts listed in the Annex II of this Directive. Reparability requirements do not oblige producers to repair defective goods, but ensure that goods are reparable. Such reparability requirements can be laid down in relevant Union legal acts. Examples are delegated acts adopted pursuant to Regulation [on the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products] or implementing measures adopted pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council17 , which create a framework to improve the environmental sustainability of products. This limitation of the obligation to repair ensures that only those goods which are reparable by design are subject to such obligation. Relevant reparability requirements include design requirements enhancing the ability to disassemble the goods and a range of spare parts to be made available for a minimum period. The obligation to repair corresponds to the scope of the reparability requirements, for instance, ecodesign requirements may apply only to certain components of the goods or a specific period of time may be set to make spare parts available. The obligation to repair under this Directive, which allows the consumer to claim repair directly against the producer in the after- sales phase, complements the supply-side related reparability requirements laid down in Regulation [on the Ecodesign Sustainable Products], encouraging consumer demand for repair. __________________ 17 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) To ensure legal certainty, this Directive lists in Annex II relevant product groups covered by such reparability requirements under Union legal actthe obligation to repair with the objective to establish a proper right to repair for consumers. In order to ensure coherence with market and legislative progress, including future reparability requirements under Union legal actsaw, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of in particular adding new product groups to Annex II when new reparability requirements are adopted. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making18 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically should have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 18 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making (OJ L 213,12.5.2016, p. 1).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) While this Directive imposes the obligation to repair on the producer, it also facilitates consumer choice of repair services from other repairers, including independent ones. This choice should in particular be facilitated by requestingthrough the adoption of a certain number of measures that ensure fair competition in the repair and after-sales services markets such as ensuring access to spare parts at reasonable costs for all actors of the sector, but also by empowering consumers to request the European Repair Information Form not only from the producer or authorised repairers, but also other repairers like the seller or independent repairers or by searching via the online repair platform. As consumers would need to pay for the repair, they are likely to compare repair opportunities in order to choose the most suitable repair services for their needs. Thus, it is likely they approach independent repairers in their proximity or the seller before reaching out to producers which may for instance be located at a greater distance and for which the price could be higher due to transportation costs.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In line with Directive (EU) 2019/771, a producer should only be exempted from the obligation to repair where repair is factutechnically or legally impossible. For examplIn such cases, the producer should state in a written and easy-to- understand format to consumers the reasons for declining the repair request. Furthermore, the producer should not refuse repair for purely economic reasons, such as the costs of spare parts. National law implementing Directive (EU) 2019/771 or the preceding Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council19 is already using the criterion whether repair is impossible and national courts are applying it. __________________ 19 Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (OJ L 171, 7.7.1999, p. 12).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to increase the consumer awareness on the availability of repair and thus its likelihood, producers, distributors and sellers should inform consumers of the existence of that obligation, including at the point of sale in a visible and prominent way. The information should mention the relevant goods covered by that obligation, together with an explanation that and to what extent repair is provided for those goods, for instance through sub- contractors. That information should be easily accessible to the consumer and provided in a clear and comprehensible manner, without the need for the consumer to request it, and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/882. The producer is, distributor and seller are free to determine the means through which it informs the consumer.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In order to encourage repair, Member States should ensure that for their territory at least one online platform exists which enables consumers to search for suitable repairers. That platform may be an existing or privately operated platform, if it meets the conditions laid down in this Directive. That platform should include user-friendly and independent comparison tools which assist consumers in assessing and comparing the merits of different repair service providers, including community- led repair initiatives, thereby incentivising consumers to choose repair instead of buying new goods. While that platform aims at facilitating the search for repair services in business-to-consumer relationships, Member States are free to extend its scope also to include business- to-business relationships as well as community-led repair initiatives.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Member States should ensure that all economic operators that may provide repair services in the Union have easy access to the online platform. Member States should be free to decide which repairers can register on the online platform as long as access to that platform is reasonable and non-discriminatory for all repairers in accordance with Union law. Enabling repairers from one Member State to register on the online platform in another Member State in order to provide repair services in areas that the consumer searched for should support the cross- border provision of repair services. It should be left to Member States’ discretion how to populate the online platform, for instance by self-registration or extraction from existing databases with the consent of the repairers, or if registrants should pay a registration fee covering the costs for operating the platform. To guarantee a wide choice of repair services on the online platform, Member States should ensure that access to the online platform is not limited to a specific category of repairers. While national requirements, for instance, on the necessary professional qualifications, continue to apply, Member States should ensure that the online platform is open to all repairers that fulfil those requirements. Member States should also be free to decide whether and to what extent cCommunity-led repair initiatives, such as repair cafés, may register on the online platform, taking account of safety considerations where relevant.. Registration on the online platform should always be possible upon repairers’ request, provided they fulfil the applicable requirements to access the online platform.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) Costs of repair have been identified as the main obstacle preventing consumers to go for this option outside the liability of the seller provided under Directive (EU) 2019/771. In order to address this problem, Member States should take appropriate measures to establish financial and fiscal incentives that allow consumers to claim back part of the costs of repair, and thus, making it a more attractive option. Furthermore, Directive 2008/98/EC requires that Member States take measures to encourage the design of products that are durable and reparable. In line with the general requirements applicable to Extended Producer Responsibility schemes in place, Member States should design the modulation of fees so that they contribute to effective waste prevention, including through repair and reuse. A significant part of the fees should be earmarked to develop reused systems, deposit refund schemes and support the repair sector with the view of making repair an affordable and attractive option for consumers.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) The Commission should enable the development of a voluntary European quality standard for repair services, for instance by encouraging and facilitating voluntary cooperation on a standard between businesses, public authorities and other stakeholders or by issuing a standardisation request to the European standardisation organisations. A European standard for repair services could boost consumer trust in repair services across the Union. Such standard could include aspects influencing consumer decisions on repair, such as the time to complete repair, the availability of temporary replacement goods, quality assurances such as a commercial guarantee on repair, and the availability of ancillary services such as removal, installation and transportation offered by repairers. When issuing a standardisation request, the Commission should take appropriate steps to involve all relevant stakeholders in the process, including independent repairers, environmental NGOs and consumer organisations, to reflect to the extent possible all aspects of the repair.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) In order to promote repair within the liability of the seller as established in Directive (EU) 2019/771, the harmonised conditions under which the choice between the remedies of repair and replacement can be exercised should be adapted. The principle established in Directive (EU) 2019/771 to use the consideration whether the remedy chosen would impose costs on the seller that are disproportionate as compared to the other remedy, as one of the criteria to determine the applicable remedy, should be maintained. The consumer remains entitled to choose repair over replacement, unless repair would be impossible or it would impose disproportionate costs on the seller as compared to replacement. However, where the costs for replacement are higher than or equal to the costs of repair, the seller should always repair the goods. Hence, the consumer is entitled to choose replacement as a remedy only where it is cheaper than repair. Directive (EU) 2019/771 should therefore be amended accordingly. Furthermore, Directive (EU) 2019/771 should be adapted to incentivize consumers to opt for repair by offering them a “restart” of the legal guarantee of conformity once the good has been repaired, meaning an additional period of two years in the event of lack of conformity after the repair has been performed. Other measures should include offering them a free-of-charge temporary replacement good, or when not feasible against a reasonable fee, while their goods are being repaired, as well as setting time limits to perform the repair that should not exceed 15 calendar days.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) Durability requirements may be provided under Union law for certain product-categories and that go beyond the liability period specified under Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. In such cases, Directive (EU) 2019/771 should be amended to introduce longer product- specific legal guarantee periods to match better the estimated lifespan of such products. This should go hand in hand with longer period for reversed burden of proof where any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within this period should be presumed to have existed at the time of delivery of the good. In order to provide for specific longer legal guarantee period for certain product-categories, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated act in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 b (new)
(28b) Directive (EU) 2019/771 provides for a regime where the seller is liable towards consumers in case of lack of conformity of the good. Introducing the possibility to bring their claims directly towards producers would promote access to repair for consumers since producers are the best placed to correct a defect and bring the good into conformity. Therefore, Directive (EU) 2019/771 should be amended accordingly.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) In order to allow economic operators to adapt, transitional provisions concerning the application of some Articles of this Directive should be introduced. Thus, the obligations to repair and to provide related information on this obligation should apply to contracts for the provision of repair services after [124 months after the entry into force]. The amendment to Directive (EU) 2019/771 should apply only to sales contracts concluded after [24 months after the entry into force] to ensure legal certainty and to provide sellers with sufficient time to adapt to the amended remedies of repair and replacement.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive lays down common rules promoting the repair of goodto establish a right to repair for consumers, with a view to contributing to the proper functioning of the internal market, while providing for a high level of consumer and environmental protection, aiming at promoting sustainable consumption patterns within planetary boundaries.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
10. ‘reparability requirements’ mean requirements under the Union legal acts listed in Annex II which enable a product to be repaired including requirements to improve its ease of disassembly, access to spare parts, and repair-related information and tools applicable to products or specific components of products;
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Member States shall not maintain or introduce in their national law provisions diverging from those laid down in this Directive, unless provided otherwise in this Directive.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a Universal Right to Repair 1. Member States shall ensure that consumers can access repair services, either by the manufacturer, or authorized or independent repairer, to restore a defective good to a condition where it fulfils its intended use, and with the ultimate goal to extend their lifetime. 2. Member States shall ensure fair competition in the repair sector by ensuring non-discriminatory access at reasonable price to spare parts, diagnosis tools as well as to repair and maintenance information, to all actors of the repair sector. 3. Any contractual, hardware or software technique preventing or limiting independent repair outside of the manufacturer or distributor’s authorised networks shall be prohibited. Such measures shall include provisions to allow the use of compatible spare parts, including those stemming from 3D printing. 4. Member States shall take appropriate measures to ban practices that prevent consumers to exert their right to repair, including but not limited to: (a) Inducing consumers to think that their good cannot be repaired due to previous repair or inspections by an independent repairer, non-professional repairer or end-users, or by inducing that it may generate risks related to safety; (b) Refusing to repair a good that has been previously repaired by an independent repairer, non-professional repairer or end-user.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
TFor cases where physical inspection of the product to be repaired is needed, the repairer may request the consumer to pay the necessary reasonable costs the repairer incurs for providing the information included in the European Repair Information Form. The costs shall be deduced from the total amount of the repair service.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) the price or, if the pricetotal price, including but not limited to costs for spare parts, labour costs, costs for operating the repair facility, costs for the freight, delivery or post charges, or, if either the total price or any of its subparts cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the manner in which the price is to be calculated and the maximum expected price for the repair;
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) the estimated maximum time needed to complete the repair;
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 218 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point g
(g) the availability of free-of-charge temporary replacement goods during the time of repair and the costs of temporary replacement, if any, for the consumer. When provided against reasonable costs, the consumer shall be informed thereof;
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The repairer shall not alter the conditions of repair specified in the European Repair Information Form for a period of 30 calendar days as from the date on which that form was provided to the consumer, unless the repairer and the consumer have agreed otherwise. If a contract for the provision of repair services is concluded within the 30 day period, the conditions of repair specified in the European Repair Information Form shall constitute an integral part of that contract.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 238 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that upon the consumer’s request, the producer shall repair, for free or against a price or another kind of consideration, goods for which and to the extent that reparability requirements are provided for by Unionn affordable price, goods that fall under the scope of legal acts as listed in Annex II. The producer shall not be obliged to repair such goods where repair is impossibletechnically or legally impossible. The producer shall not refuse the consumer’s request purely due to economic considerations such as the costs incurred by the repair. The producer may sub-contract repair in order to fulfil its obligation to repair.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 243 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The repair pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be carried out subject to the following conditions: (a) it shall be carried out either free of charge or at an affordable price for consumers; (b) it shall be carried out within a maximum of 15 calendar days, to be further defined depending on the specificities of product-category, from the moment the producer has taken physical possession of the good, has received the good or has been given access to the good by the consumer; and (c) the producer shall provide the consumer with a replacement good free of charge or against a reasonable fee for the duration of the repair.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where the producer obliged to repair pursuant to paragraph 1 is established outside the Union, its authorised representative in the Union shall perform the obligation of the producer. Where the producer has no authorised representative in the Union, the importer of the good concerned shall perform the obligation of the producer. Where there is no importer, the distributor of the good concerned shall perform the obligation of the producerfulfilment service provider shall perform the obligation of the producer. Where there is no fulfilment service provider involved, the distributor of the good concerned shall perform the obligation of the producer. For cases where there is no economic operator as listed in the first subparagraph able to fulfil the obligation of the producer, the obligation of the producer shall be performed by a provider of online marketplace.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Producers shall ensure thatgrant to independent repairers haveand end-users access to all spare parts and all repair- related information and tools, in accordance with the Union legal acts listed in Annex IIcluding diagnosis tools, for the goods and, where relevant, access to data, that fall under the scope of legal acts listed in Annex II, at reasonable and non-discriminatory costs for a period corresponding to at least to expected lifespan of the product.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Producers shall not prevent the use of second-hand spare parts, including compatible spare parts and spare parts issued from 3D-printing, by independent repairers when those are in conformity with requirements under national or Union law.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 270 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Producers shall not prevent repair outside their authorized networks through the use of any contractual, hardware or software technique.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Producers shall make available on their websites all information related to repair, such as repair prices and prices of spare parts for the goods falling under the scope of legal acts listed in Annex II.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 278 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to amend Annex II by updating the list of Union legal acts laying down reparability requirements inthat are subject to the oblight of legislative developmentsation to repair.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that producers, distributors and sellers inform consumers of their obligation to repair pursuant to Article 5 and provide information on the repair services in an easily accessible, clear and comprehensible manner, for example through the online platform referred to in Article 7, their websites, as well as at point of sale.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall develop and fund awareness-campaigns to inform consumers about their rights under Directive 2019/771 as well as about the right to repair, including obligations on producers, as laid down under this Directive.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 288 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that at least one online platform exists for their territory that allows consumers to easily find repairers and repair led-communities. That platform shall:
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) inform consumers about applicable financial and fiscal incentives to lower costs of repair;
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 307 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that the information on the online platform for repair is communicated to consumers at the point of sale. They shall also make the platform accessible and ensure that the information provided is up-to-date.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 308 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the link of the online platform for repair in their territory by [12 months after entry into force of this Directive]. The Commission shall keep a publicly available, easily accessible and machine-readable database of existing platforms for repair in Member States.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a Financial incentives 1. Member States shall take appropriate measures to support affordable repair for consumers. Such measures shall include, but are not limited to, fiscal and financial incentives to make repair more attractive to consumers. 2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 may, for example, take the form of repair vouchers, national repair funds or other similar measures and incentives, such as reduced VAT rates, that allow consumers to claim back part or lower the repair costs. 3. In line with Article 8(a)4(b) of Directive 2008/98/EC, Member States shall adopt measures to ensure that a significant part of financial contributions under extended producer responsibility schemes are dedicated to the development of instruments that support the repair sector. 4. Member States shall report to the Commission the measures taken under paragraph 1 by [24 months after the date of transposition of this Directive]. The Commission shall make the measures introduced by Member States publicly available. 5. By [4 years after the date of transposition of this Directive], the Commission shall review and assess the effectiveness of the measures taken by Member States in promoting repair in their territories.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that the following non-exhaustive and indicative criteria are taken into account for the imposition of penalties, where appropriate: (a) the nature, gravity, scale and duration of the infringement; (b) any action taken by the trader to mitigate or remedy the damage suffered by consumers; (c) any previous infringements by the trader; (d) the financial benefits gained or losses avoided by the trader due to the infringement, if the relevant data are available; (e) penalties imposed on the trader for the same infringement in other Member States in cross-border cases where information about such penalties is available through the mechanism established by Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 of the European Parliament and of the Council; (f) any other aggravating or mitigating factors applicable to the circumstances of the case.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Member States shall ensure that when penalties are to be imposed in accordance with Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, they include the possibility either to impose fines through administrative procedures or to initiate legal proceedings for the imposition of fines, or both, the maximum amount of such fines being at least 4 % of the trader’s annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned. Without prejudice to that Regulation, Member States may, for national constitutional reasons, restrict the imposition of fines to: (a) infringements of Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 and of Annex I to this Directive; and (b) a trader’s continued use of a commercial practice that has been found to be unfair by the competent national authority or court, when that commercial practice is not an infringement referred to in point (a).
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 328 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. For cases where a fine is to be imposed in accordance with paragraph 3, but information on the trader’s annual turnover is not available, Member States shall introduce the possibility to impose fines, the maximum amount of which shall be at least EUR 2 million.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 330 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall, by 124 months from the entry into force notify the Commission of the rules and of the measures referred to in paragraph 1and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 333 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Article 7(1), point (d) of Directive (EU) 2019/771 is replaced by the following: ‘(d) be of the quantity and possess the qualities and other features, including in relation to durability, reparability, functionality, compatibility and security normal for goods of the same type and which the consumer may reasonably expect given the nature of the goods and taking into account any public statement made by or on behalf of the seller, or other persons in previous links of the chain of transactions, including the producer, particularly in advertising or on labelling.’
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Article 10 of Directive 2019/771 is amended as follows: ‘1. The seller and the producer shall be jointly and severally liable to the consumer for any lack of conformity which exists at the time when the goods were delivered and which becomes apparent within two years of that time. Without prejudice to Article 7(3), this paragraph shall also apply to goods with digital elements. 2. In the case of goods with digital elements, where the sales contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time, the seller or producer shall also be jointly liable for any lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service that occurs or becomes apparent within two years of the time when the goods with digital elements were delivered. Where the contract provides for a continuous supply for more than two years, the seller shall be jointly liable for any lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service that occurs or becomes apparent within the period of time during which the digital content or digital service is to be supplied under the sales contract 2a. By derogation to paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, in case of goods for which durability requirements are provided for under Union law, the seller or producer shall be liable for longer periods than specified in paragraph 1 and 2 of this Article. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts to adjust the length of legal guarantee of conformity according to the period of the required durability that is provided for under Union law, while taking into consideration the estimated lifespan of the good.'
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b. Article 10, paragraph 6 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, is replaced by the following: "6. Member States may provide that, in the case of second-hand goods, the seller and the consumer cannot agree to contractual terms or agreements with a shorter liability or limitation period than those referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 5. Member States may maintain or introduce longer time limits."
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 336 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c. In Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘Any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within two years of the time when the goods were delivered shall be presumed to have existed at the time when the goods were delivered, unless proved otherwise or unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of the goods or with the nature of the lack of conformity. This paragraph shall also apply to goods with digital elements.'
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph -1 d (new)
-1d. In Article 11 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 'Instead of the two-years period laid down in paragraph 1, where longer periods apply in accordance with Article 10(2a) and 10(3), Member States shall ensure that those periods apply also for reversed burden of proof.'
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Directive (EU) 2019/771
Article 13 – paragraph 2
In derogation from the first sentence of this paragraph, where the coststhe seller or producer shall repair the goods in order to bring those goods in conformity. In the case that repair is technically or legally not feasible or where repair does not bring the goods in conformity, the consumer is entitled to opt for the replacement are equal to orof the goods. For cases where the costs for repair are greater than the costs for repairlacement, the seller shall repair the goods in ordor producer may propose to consumers to replace the good in question, including by offering a refurbished good. Where the consumer directly request the producer to bring those goods into conformity. , and where this request is fulfilled by the producer, the seller shall be discharged from its liability pursuant to Article 10.'
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 352 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, the following paragraph is inserted: '4a. Where, in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, the good has been brought into conformity by means of repair, the seller or producer shall be liable for any lack of conformity which exists at the time the consumer received the repaired goods and which becomes apparent within 2 years after that time. This shall not apply if the seller has already successfully repaired the goods in accordance with Article 10. Without prejudice to Article 7(3), this paragraph shall also apply to goods with digital elements. This paragraph shall be without prejudice to other time limits under Article 10 and further claims of the consumer.'
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 355 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 b (new)
In Article 14 of Directive (EU)2019/771, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. Repairs shall be carried out: (a) free of charge; (b) within maximum 15 calendar days, depending on specificities of the product- category, from the moment the seller has been informed by the consumer about the repair; and (c) without any significant inconvenience to the consumer, taking into account the nature of the goods and the purpose for which the consumer required the goods; (d) the seller shall provide the consumer with a free-of-charge, or against a reasonable fee, replacement good for the duration of the repair.”
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 356 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 c (new)
In Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, the following paragraph is inserted: “1a. Replacements shall be carried out: (a) free of charge; (b) within a reasonable period of time from the moment the seller has been informed by the consumer about the lack of conformity; (c) without any significant inconvenience to the consumer, taking into account the nature of the goods and the purpose for which the consumer required the goods; and (d) upon request of the consumer, by offering a refurbished good”
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 357 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 d (new)
In Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, the following paragraph is inserted: “4a. In the event that the consumer decides, pursuant to Article 13(2), that the producer shall bring the goods into conformity by means of repair, the producer shall be understood as being the seller for the purpose of this Article.”
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 369 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [124 months from the entry into force] at the latest. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 372 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall apply those measures from [124 months from the entry into force].
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 378 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – subheading 1
LIST OF UNION LEGAL ACTS SUBJECT TO THE OBLIGATION OF REPAIR
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – subheading 2
LAYING DOWN REPARABILITY REQUIREMENTSdeleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 383 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 1
1. Household washing machines and household washer-dryers according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/202321 __________________ 21 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2023 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for household washing machines and household washer-dryers pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 1015/2010 (OJ 315, 5.12.2019, p. 285).Regulation on [Ecodesign for Sustainable Products]
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 385 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 2
2. Household dishwashers according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/202222 __________________ 22 Commission RegulationREGULATION (EU) 2019/2022 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for household dishwashers pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 1016/2010 (OJ 315, 5.12.2019, p. 267).23/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 3
3. Refrigerating appliances with a direct sales function according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/202423 __________________ 23 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2024 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for refrigerating appliances with a direct sales function pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 315, 5.12.2019, p. 313).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 4
4. Refrigerating appliances according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/201924 __________________ 24 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2019 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for refrigerating appliances pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 643/2009 (OJ 315, 5.12.2019, p. 187).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 390 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 5
5. Electronic displays according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/202125 __________________ 25 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for electronic displays pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2009 (OJ 315, 5.12.2019, p.241).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 392 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 6
6. Welding equipment according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/178426 __________________ 26 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1784 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for welding equipment pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 272, 25.10.2019, p. 121).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 394 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 7
7. Vacuum cleaners according to Commission Regulation (EU) 666/201327 __________________ 27 Commission Regulation (EU) 666/2013 of 8 July 2013 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for vacuum cleaners (OJ 192, 13.07.2013, p. 24).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 397 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 8
8. Servers and data storage products according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/42428 __________________ 28 Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/424 of 15 March 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for servers and data storage products pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 617/2013 (OJ 74, 18.03.2019, p. 46).deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 399 #

2023/0083(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 9
9. [Mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets according to Commission Regulation (EU) .../…29 ] __________________ 29 …deleted
2023/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 4 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Under the first pillar, the Union should develop and maintain an industrial basis for the provision of net-zero technology solutions to secure its energy supply, while also living up to its ambitions on climate neutrality. To support that goal and to avoidreduce dependencies for the supply of net-zero technologies that wcould delay the Union’s greenhouse gas emission reductions efforts or put at risk the security of supply of energyjeopardise the achievement of Union’s climate and energy objectives, this Regulation shallould set out provisions to encourage demand for sustainable and resilient net-zero technologies in the Union.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 9 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU already allow contracting authorities and entities awarding contracts through public procurement procedures to rely, in addition to price or cost, on additionalqualitative criteria for identifying the most economically advantageous tender. Such criteria concern for instance the quality of the tender including social, environmental andor innovative characteristics. When awarding contracts for net-zero technology through public procurement, contracting authorities and contracting entities should duly assess the tenders’ contribution to sustainability and resilience in relation to a series of criteria relating to the tender’s environmental and social sustainability, innovation, system integration and to resilience.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 13 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Without prejudice to Union legislation applicable to a specific technology, including under the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products44 and the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries45 , and unless otherwise indicated therein, when evaluating the environmental sustainability of the net-zero solutions procured on the basisfalling under the scope of this Regulation, contracting authorities and contracting entities mayshould take into account various elements with an impact on the climate and the environment. These may include, for instance, the durability and reliability of the solution; the ease of repair and maintenance; the ease of upgrading and refurbishment; the ease and quality of recycling; the use of certain substances; the consumption of energy, water and other resources in one or more life cycle stages of the product; the weight and volume of the product and its packaging; the incorporation of used components; the quantity, characteristics and availability of consumables needed for proper use and maintenance; the environmental footprint of the product and its life cycle environmental impacts; the carbon footprint of the product; the microplastic release; emissions to air, water or soil released in one or more life cycle stages of the product; the amounts of waste generated; the conditions for use. __________________ 44 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC, COM/2022/142 final, 30.03.2022. 45 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, COM/2020/798 final, 10.12.2020.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 16 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) For the purposes of taking into account within a public procurement procedure of the need to diversify sources of supply of net-zero technologies away from single sources of supply within the meaning of Article 19 (2), and without prejudice to the Union’s international commitments, the supply should at least be deemed insufficiently diversified where a single source supplies for more than 65% of the demand for a specific net-zero technology within the Unionat global level.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The application of the provisions on resilience in public procurement procedures set out in Article 19 of this Regulation should be without prejudice to the application of Article 25 of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council47 , and Articles 43 and 85 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council48 , as according with the Commission’s guidance of 201949 . The same way, public procurement provisions should continue to apply to works, supplies and services subject to Article 19, including article 67 (4) of Directive 2014/24/EU and any implementing measures resulting from the Proposal for a Regulation establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products. __________________ 47 Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65). 48 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243). 49 Communication from the Commission: Guidance on the participation of third country bidders and goods in the EU procurement market, Brussels, 24.7.2019, C(2019) 5494 final.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The weighting of criteria on the sustainability and resilience contribution of the tender in relation to public procurement procedures is without prejudice to the possibility for contracting authorities and contracting entities to set a higher threshold for the criteria relating to environmental sustainability andor innovation, in line with Article 41 (3) and Recital 64 of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council50 , Article 67 (5) of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 82 (5) of Directive 2014/25/EU. __________________ 50 Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 1).
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) environmental and social sustainability going beyond the minimum requirements in applicable legislation;
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the tender’s contribution to resilience and diversification of the corresponding supply chains, taking into account the proportion of the products and of its key components originating from a single source of supply, as determined in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council72 , from which more than 65% of the supply for that specific net-zero technology within the Unionglobally originates in the last year for which data is available for when the tender takes place, and the level of concentration of the supply chain at global level. . __________________ 72 Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. Contracting authorities and contracting entities shall give the tender’s sustainability and resilience contribution a weight between 15% andrespectively a weight of at least 30% of the award criteria, without prejudice of the application of Article 41 (3) of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 67 (5) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 82 (5) of Directive 2014/25/EU for giving a higher weighting to the criteria referred to in paragraph 2, points (a) and (b).
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The contracting authority or the contracting entity shall not be obliged to applybase the contract on the considerations relating to the sustainability and resilience contribution of net-zero technologies where their application would oblige that authority or entity to acquire equipment having disproportionate costs, or technical characteristics different from those of existing equipment, resulting in incompatibility, technical difficulties in operation and maintenance. Cost differences above 1025% may be presumed by contracting authorities and contracting entities to be disproportionate. This provision shall be without prejudice of the possibility to exclude abnormally low tenders under Article 69 of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 84 of Directive 2014/25/EU, and without prejudice to other contract award criteria according to the EU legislation, including social aspects according to Articles 30 (3) and 36 (1), second intent of Directive 2014/23/EU, Articles 18 (2) and 67 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU and Articles 36 (2) and 82 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Where relevant, tThe Commission shall provide guidance on the criteria to assess the resilience and sustainability contribution of available products covered by the forms of public intervention covered under articles 19, 20 and 21.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall make available and regularly update a list of each of the net-zero technology final products listed in the Annex and corresponding supply chains, broken down by the share of Union supply along the supply chains originating in different third countries in the last year for which data is available.
2023/06/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) For some raw materials, the Union is almost fully dependent on a single country for its supply. Such dependencies entail a high risk of supply disruptions. To limit such potential riskLikewise, a large number of strategic raw materials are sourced from countries in which mining is linked to serious human rights abuses, the deterioration of governance, conflicts, and environmental destruction. To limit such adverse effects and increase the Union’s economic resilience, efforts should be undertaken to ensure that, by 2030, it is not overly dependent on a single third country for more than 65% of its supply of any strategic raw material, unprocessed and at any stage of processing, giving however special consideration to countries with whom the Union has established a Strategic Partnership on raw materials giving rise to greater assurances regarding supply risks. primary sources of raw materials, has significantly decreased its dependency on specific third countries for its supply, and has implemented autonomous and collaborative measures to mitigate the risk of human rights abuses and environmental destruction in the raw material supply chain, including via the use of Strategic Partnership.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to diversify the Union's supply of strategic raw materials, the Commission should, with the support of the Board, identify Strategic Projects in third countries that intend to become active in the extraction, processing or recycling of strategic raw materials. To ensure that such Strategic Projects are effectively implemented, they should benefit from improved access to finance. In order to ensure their added value, projects should be assessed against a set of criteria, taking into account that in the past for a majority of resource-rich developing countries, mining, oil or gas exploitation has not translated into broader-based economic, human and social development. Like projects in the Union, all Strategic Projects in third countries should strengthen the Union's security of supply for strategic raw materials, show sufficient technical feasibility and be implemented sustainably, in compliance with due diligence processes as defined by EU legislation and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct and Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, addressing adverse impacts on human rights and environmental, rule of law and good governance, as well as the FAO Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests, where land tenure rights are concerned. For projects in emerging markets and developing economies, the project should be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country involved and add value in that country, taking in, taking into account that for mineral-rich developing countries, realising the full potential of the mining sector account also its consistency with the Union’s common commercial policys a catalyst for sustainable development is fraught with many challenges, which includes i.a.: the finite nature of mineral deposits; the “enclave” nature of the extractive industry, with few links to the local economy; the volatility in commodity prices; limited national capacities, which leaves ill-equipped national administrations vulnerable to large multinational companies; corruption and conflicting stakeholders interests. Such value may be derived from the project’s contribution to more than one stage of the whole value chain, including raw material processing, as well as from creating through the project wider economic and social benefits, including the creation of employment in compliance with international standards, notably the core labour standards of the International Labour Organisation, as well as the right to the free, prior, and informed consent of Indigenous peoples and local communities, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. Where the Commission assesses these criteria to be fulfilled, it should publish the recognition as a Strategic Project in a decision.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The definition of mutually beneficial partnership with third countries entails, in particular for low-income resource-rich countries, to breaking away from the enclave nature and extractivist model of the mining sector and to afford developing countries sufficient policy space facilitate knowledge and technology, local value addition by facilitating the manufacturing of finished and semi-finished goods in relevant downstream industries, economic and social development in partner countries, as well as the uptake of environmentally sustainable and circular economy practices and decent working conditions;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) The Union has concluded Strategic Partnerships covering raw materials with third countries in order to implement the 2020 Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials. In order to diversify supply, these efforts should continue. Nevertheless, the Union shall fully take into account that extractive activities in developing countries often operate in complex social environments surrounded by vulnerable communities. To develop and ensure a coherent framework for the conclusion of future partnerships, the Member States and the Commission should, as part of their interaction on the Board and with full involvement of the European Parliament, discuss and ensure coordination on, inter alia, whether existing partnerships achieve the intended aims, the prioritisation of third countries for new partnerships, the content of such partnerships and their coherence and potential synergies between Member States' bilateral cooperation with relevant third countries. The Union should seek mutually beneficial partnerships with emerging market and developing economies, in coherence with its Global Gateway strategy, which contribute to the diversification of its raw materials supply chain as well a notably in terms of rent extraction, getting a fair deal and share of profits, transparency, accountability, knowledge and technology sharing. Strategic partnerships should include commitments from the Union to offer technical assistance to tackle illicit financial flows, improve regulation of the activities of trans-national corporations and financial regulation, as well technical assistance to governments adnd value in the production in these countriesprivate actors to support compliance with Union legislation on supply chain due diligence.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 141 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 62
(62) Strategic Partnership’ means a commitment between the Union and a third country to increase cooperation related to the raw materials value chain that is established through a non-binding instrument setting out concrete actions of mutual interes, setting out concrete measures of mutual interest in areas such as environmental and human rights protection, technology and knowledge transfer, research and development, value distribution, working conditions and national socio-economic development.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for projects in third countries that are emerging markets or developing economies, the project would be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country concerned by adding value in that country.respecting international standards and conventions and the highest environmental and human rights standards in that country and by adding local value, notably through inclusive business models in which local communities participate in decision-making, their rights are protected and they benefit from extractive activities;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 275 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) factors that might affect supply, including but not limited to the geopolitical situation, logistics, energy supply, workforce or natural disasters, as well as the risk of human rights violations and lack of compliance with international sustainability standards and, when applicable, Union legislation;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 333 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) ensure that any such measure is not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade and is no more trade-restrictive than necessary to achieve the Union’s climate and environmental objectives, having regard to the ability of third-country suppliers to comply with such a declaration such that aggregate trade flows and critical raw materials costs are not disproportionately affected;deleted
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 338 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Strategic Partnerships concluded by the Union with third countries shall contain concrete measures contributing towards: (i) improving the resilience and sustainability of the Union's supply of critical raw materials listed in Annex II; (ii) the benchmark set out in Article 1, paragraph 2, point (b); (iii) improving cooperation and shared responsibility along the critical raw materials value chain between the Union and partner countries in achieving the agreed partnership objectives, while respecting the policy space of the EU and of the partner countries; (iv) the economic and social development in partner countries, in particular for emerging and developing economies, through a governance framework that prioritises human rights, while also promoting the uptake of environmentally sustainable and circular economy practices and decent working conditions; (v) the increase of local value addition by facilitating the manufacturing of finished and semi-finished goods in relevant downstream industries, including via the facilitation or support of private and public investment; (ix) The transfer of knowledge and technology as well as transfer of patents where this would be determinant for moving up the value chain for the partner country ( vi) the recognition of the rights of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPCI) of Indigenous People and Local Communities; (vii) the full transparency of the mining sector in relation to revenues and contracts, in line with Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) requirements, including regarding environmental transparency[2] ( viii) implementation of the United Nations Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) and the Protect, Respect and Remedy framework.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 343 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) tThe extent to which Strategic Partnerships concluded by the Union contribute towards: the objectives laid down in paragraph 1
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 344 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) improving the Union's security of supply;deleted
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 346 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the benchmark set out in Article 1, paragraph 2, point (b);deleted
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 348 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) improving cooperation along the critical raw materials value chain between the Union and partner countries;deleted
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 366 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) whether a third country's regulatory framework ensures the monitoring, prevention and minimisation of expresses interest in ensuring that its regulatory framework or its effective implementation ensures the monitoring, prevention, minimisation and compensation of adverse social and environmental impacts of mining, the use of socially responsible practices including respect of human and labour rights and meaningful engagement with local communitiesand active participation in strategic projects decision-making by of affected local communities, in particular indigenous people, the use of transparent and responsible business practices, in line with the UN Principles on Business and Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Due Diligence Guidelines for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from conflict- affected and high-risk areas the Convention on Biodiversity and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and the prevention of adverse impacts on the proper functioning of public administration and the rule of law;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 374 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) whether there are existing cooperation agreements between a third country and the Union and, for emerging markets and developing economies, whether the potential for the deployment of Global Gateway investment projects respond to shared visions (e.g. Country Mining Visions of Africa Mining Visions) and are fully aligned with national development plans (e.g. industrial and trade policies); respect human rights and contribute to the decoupling of natural resource use.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 376 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii a (new)
(iiia) whether civil society participation processes are in place in the partner country to enable participation of the public in the implementation of the partnership;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 378 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
(iva) for emerging markets and developing economies, whether partnerships contribute to the formalisation of the mining sector, especially the artisanal and small-scale mining sector, notably though developing conducive and comprehensive legal frameworks, ensuring access to capital, providing access to geological data and appropriate equipment for small-scale miners;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 383 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. The Board shall, in the context of paragraph 1 and 2 and in so far as relates to emerging market and developing economies, ensure cooperation and policy coherence for sustainable development, as enshrined in the UN 2030 Agenda, with other relevant coordination fora, including those established as part of the Global Gateway strategy. and the Union´s common commercial policy, including its investment components, and its Trade and Sustainable Development approach;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The form in which EU fertilising products are labelled in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 should be adapted to technological and societal changes in the field of digitalisation, with the aim at improving or, at least, maintaining, the quality and accessibility of the information of such labels.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 22 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Providing information on a label in a digital form (‘digital label’) has clear benefits. Digital labelling can improve the communication of labelling information both by avoiding overcrowded physical labels and by allowing users to rely on various reading options available only for digital formats, such as increased font, automatic search, loud speakers or translation into other languages. In addition, digital labelling of EU fertilising products contributes to the ongoing progress with regard to the digitalis and green transformation of the European agricultural sector, reducing packaging waste and can facilitate theing reporting obligations of farmers regarding the use of such products. Digital labelling can also lead to a more efficient management of the labelling obligations by economic operators, by facilitating the update of labelling information and permitting a more targeted information to users. In addition, digital labelling can contribute to reducing labelling costs all along the supply chain, which could ultimately lead to a reduction in fertiliser prices, given that the labels of EU fertilising products may be changed following a transaction between economic operators, before reaching end-users,
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) However, digital labelling can also create new challenges concerning the availability and quality of the information on labels being compromised, as well as for the vulnerable population groups, in particular persons with no, or insufficient, digital skills or persons with disabilities, and thus accentuateaccess to digital devices needed to retrieve the digital labels, and for persons with disabilities, and thus preventing these groups from easily obtaining essential information, such as safety precautions, usage instructions or environmental impact, ultimately accentuating the digital divide. Therefore, digital labelling should be introduced in Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, under certain conditions, and should be easily legible, accessible and understandable to all groups, taking into account the need to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, and the digital readiness.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 25 #

2023/0049(COD)

(5) Economic operators should remain free to choose if to provide a digital or physical label. This will ensure that such economic operators have flexibility to opt for the rules most appropriate to their situation. It is particularly important not to create unjustified costs for small and medium-sized enterprises for which digital labelling might be challenging, given the reduced volumes or types of EU fertilising products. It is also important to support such enterprises with guidance and training programmes in order to allow them to develop the adequate skills and capabilities to comply with this Regulation.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Where economic operators opt for digital labelling of EU fertilising products supplied to end-users in a packaging, they should therefore ensure that a minimum set of relevant information is also available on the physical label. In this context and with regard to other rules specific to products made available in a packaging, a packaging should contain no more than 1000 kg in coherence with Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/201124 . Products supplied in a packaging exceeding this limit should be considered as being supplied without a packaging for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2019/1009. This will also address the challenges that vulnerable population groups may face. The specific information that economic operators should be allowed to provide only on a digital label should therefore reflect the current state of the digitalisation of the society and the particular situation of the users of EU fertilising products. In order to enable all end-users to make informed choices before buying EU fertilising products and to ensure the safe handling and use of such products by all groups of end-users, labelling information concerning safety, the protection of human and animal health and, the environment and the impact of the fertilisers, including their production process, as well as minimum information on the agronomic and agroecological efficiency of the EU fertilising products and on their content and use, should always be provided on the physical label. Digital labels should also include information on GHG emissions related to the production process. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 should clearly indicate which information may be provided only digitally. _________________ 24 Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive, OJ L 54, 26.2.2011, p. 1.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) For EU fertilising products supplied without packaging, the economic operators are to provide the labelling elements in a leaflet. The leaflet, contrary to physical labels, has no physical link to the product itself and therefore does not offer immediate access to the information relevant to the product when handling it. Providing the same labelling elements in digital format would imply an adjustment of the way the information is retrieved without creating significant risks to users. Economic operators should therefore be allowed to provide all the labelling elements referred to in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 in a digital label only for the EU fertilising products supplied without packaging. Where the economic operators choose to provide, in addition to a digital label, a physical label, they should be free to decide which labelling elements to include in that physical label, taking into account the need to include a minimum set of relevant information, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1009.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to ensure that users receive all the labelling elements on the digital label and will not need to compile the information both from a physical and a digital label, economic operators using a digital label should be required to include all such labelling elements in that label, even if they are also included on the physical label. The digital label should also contain information allowing end-users to identify and contact the manufacturer of the EU fertilising products and, where appropriate, the importer and the responsible person in the EU as defined in Regulation (EU) 2023/988, as this is an essential information and providing it digitally will facilitate the link between the product and the digital label. In addition, given that fertilising products are also placed on the market as non-harmonised products, it is important to include on the digital label the CE-mark and any corresponding reference to a notified body, so that end-users can deduce only from using the digital label that the product is marketed in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1009. However, to facilitate the update of certain information to be provided by the manufacturers, which changes frequently and is not used on a daily basis by end-users (more precisely, the batch number and the production date), the manufacturers should have the choice to provide the information either physically or digitally.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Since digital labels, similarly to physical labels, are a means of providing mandatory information on EU fertilising products to users, economic operators should ensure free access to digital labels from the moment it is placed on the market until the expiry date. In addition, and in order to improve the chances that users will in practice retrieve the information, the information provided on the digital label should be easily accessible to end-users in the Union through widely used digital technologies compatible with all major operating systems and browsers, and ensuring that access to the label does not require any password, registration, nor any specific application and taking into account the needs of vulnerable groups.. Economic operators should not mix the information required by Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 with other information not requested by Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, such as marketing or commercial statements. Digital space has no space limitations typical for physical labels affixed to the packaging. It is therefore important to keep the labelling elements provided in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 concentrated in one place, so that they are not difficult to find among various other information which economic operators might provide. Economic operators should also ensure that digital labels are presented in a way that takes into account the needs of vulnerable population groups, including persons with disabilities, to further reduce the challenges such groups may face.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Taking into account both the interest of users to have access to information about EU fertilising products with a relatively long shelf life and the interest of economic operators to avoid unnecessary costs, economic operators should ensure that the digital label is available for a period of 5 years from the moment the EU fertilising product is placed on the market until the expiry date.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to keep Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 up-to-date to technical progress, new scientific evidence and the evolution of the digitalisation of the society, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing the requirements for digital labelling and amending Annex III with regard to which labelling elements economic operators making available on the market EU fertilising products in a packaging to end-users may provide on a digital label only. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, taking into account the views of all relevant stakeholders, including at expert level, and that those consultations are conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making25 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 25 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) When deciding which labelling elements may be provided only digitally by economic operators making available on the market EU fertilising products in a packaging to end-users, the Commission should take into account the level of digital readiness among users of EU fertilising products and the need to keep the use of such products safe for human and animal health and the environment, as well as the need to ensure availability of the digital label from the moment the fertilising product is placed on the market until the expiry date.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 6 – paragraph 7
(a) in a language and a format which can be easily understood by end-users, including persons with disabilities, as determined by the Member State concerned;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 6 – paragraph 7
(b) clear, accurate, understandable and intelligible;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 8 – paragraph 4
(a) in a language and a format which can be easily understood by end-users, including vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilites, as determined by the Member State concerned;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 8 – paragraph 4
(aa) clear, accurate, understandable and intelligible;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 b (new)
(b) easily and directly accessible by all major operating systems, without a need to register in advance, to download or install applications or to provide a password;accessible to all potential users in the Union;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 b (new)
(d) presented in a way that also addresses the needs of vulnerable groups and supports, as relevant, the necessary adaptations to facilitate access by those groups, including persons with disabilities;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 b (new)
(e) available for a period of 5 years from the moment the EU fertilising product is placed on the market until the expiry date, including in case of an insolvency, a liquidation or a cessation of activity in the Union of the economic operator that created it.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 b (new)
4. A data carrier used for a digital label shall be printed or placed physically on the packaging or, where the EU fertilising products are made available on the market without a packaging, on the accompanying document or leaflet, visibly, legibly, accessibily, easily understandable and in a way that allows it to be processed automatically by digital devices.
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 c (new)
2. Upon request by the end-users, or without such request where the digital label is temporarily unavailable at the time of purchase, economic operators making available on the market EU fertilising products to such end-users shall provide the information included on the digital label, by alternative means and free of charge, from the moment the fertilising product is placed on the market until the expiry date.;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 c (new) 2(5) e a (new)
(ea) take into account the provision of the information from the moment the EU fertilising product is placed on the market until the expiry date;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2023/0049(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009
Article 11 c (new)
10. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 to amend Annex III, as regards the labelling information which economic operators may provide on a digital label only in accordance with Article 11a(3) point (b), in order to adapt that Annex to technical and scientific progress or to the level of digital readiness among end-users of EU fertilising products. When adopting the delegated acts, the Commission shall take into account the need to ensure a high level of safety and protection of human and animal health and the environment.;
2023/09/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 6 October 2022 on the outcome of the Commission’s review of the 15-point action plan on trade and sustainable development,
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission communication of 11 December 2019 on the European Green Deal (COM(2019)0640),
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the Paris Agreement of 2015,
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 b (new)
– having regard to the core conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO),
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU and New Zealand share fundamental values, such as respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and both support a rules-based trading system, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) as its centrepiece; whereas both parties are committed to fighting climate change and protecting social rights and are bound by the Paris Agreement and ILO Conventions; whereas New Zealand has committed to stopping fossil fuel subsidies;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas New Zealand is situated in the dynamic Indo-Pacific region and is a member of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) ; whereas New Zealand is a cosponsor of the WTO Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussion (TESSD) and a founder of the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) aimed at liberalizing tariffs for environmental goods and phasing out fossil fuel subsidies;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas bilateral trade in goods between the EU and New Zealand was worth EUR 9 billion in 2022 and the value of trade in services amounted to EUR 3.5 billion in 2021; whereas the EU was New Zealand’s third-largest trading partner in goods in 2022; whereas New Zealand is a world leading exporter of agricultural products;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas this is the first EU trade agreement aligned with the EU’s new approach to trade and sustainable development, which considers sanctions as last resort in cases of breach of the Paris Agreement and core ILO Conventions;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas open, fair and sustainable development-oriented trade is one of the four pillars of the EU’s Green Deal industrial plan; whereas trade agreements shall support and not contradict EU Green Deal’s objectives and targets and such alignment should be closely monitored;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers this agreement to be of major significance for bilateral relations between the EU and New Zealand and the promotion of rules- and values-based trade, in line with the European Green Deal;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that, as the most ambitious and comprehensive EU trade deal ever concluded, the agreement delivers on the priorities set out in Parliament’s resolutions of 25 February 2016 and 26 October 2017; notes that the agreement includes a dispute settlement mechanism to ensure that the rights and obligations contained therein are respected;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that New Zealand has not yet ratified several ILO conventions relevant for ensuring fair labour conditions, namely fundamental convention 87 related to the freedom of association and right to collective bargaining, and convention 138 pertaining to the effective abolition of child labour;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Welcomes the recognition by both parties of the need to phase out fossil fuels and to cooperate to this end; calls upon the Parties to develop an implementation roadmap to clarify their bilateral ambition and the joined-up efforts in relevant international fora;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the inclusion of athe first chapter on Māori trade and economic cooperation, together with specific provisions regarding Māori in several other places in the agreement, and stresses the importance of all citizens and companies in the EU and New Zealand being able to benefit from the trade and investment opportunities that the agreement brings; regrets, however, that this chapter is not subject to the general dispute settlement chapter;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for both parties to recognise and improve the rights of indigenous peoples, both within the trade agreement and more broadly, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; recalls that protection of the environment and biodiversity can be better assured through cooperation with indigenous peoples, and that legal mechanisms of involvement and cooperation, must be codesigned with indigenous people and must include the principle of Free Prior and Informed Consent, in order to ensure their genuine participation;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the agreement will level the playing field with other trading partners that already have FTAs with New Zealand; notes the high level of tariff liberalisation under the agreement, which will entail the removal of 100 % of New Zealand tariffs on EU exports at entry into force and the lifting of 98.5 % of EU tariffs on New Zealand trade after seven years; believes that the sensitive character of certain European agricultural sectors has been duly reflected by well-calibrated concessions in the form of tariff-rate quotas and longer transition periodscalls upon the Commission to regularly monitor developments in the agricultural sectors most exposed to New Zealand exports, such as sheep meat; welcomes the inclusion of dedicated chapters on sustainable food systems and animal welfare respectively and an ambitious chapter on sanitary and phytosanitary matters; stresses the need to ensure that the trade agreement does not contradict a strategy towards sustainable home-grown fruit and vegetables, promoting healthy quality food and regenerative agricultural practices;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights that the EU and New Zealand legislations on the use of pesticides exhibit certain differences, notably in their regulation of seeds treated with pesticides, which may lead to divergent legislative treatment of pesticides or pesticide-treated products; calls on the Commission to clarify how it will ensure coherence in standards applied to imports and EU produce, and whether specific cooperation or mirror measures will be considered to ensure protection of biodiversity and soil health both in New Zealand and the EU;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Welcomes that the EU-NZ FTA contains a chapter on animal welfare; recalls that New Zealand has prohibited the transport of live animals by sea and that exchanges on this matter are of particular interest for the EU in enhancing its animal welfare practices;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Highlights that the EU intends to update and improve its animal welfare standards through a review of animal welfare legislation in the near future, including a phase-out of cage farming; reminds that this and future FTAs should foresee animal welfare-related mirror clauses, responding to citizens’ expectations, as per Eurobarometer 442; highlights the need for cooperation with New Zealand in light of the upcoming legislative proposals on animal welfare, in order to ensure common increased ambition;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Highlights that in accordance with the environmental ambitions of the European Green Deal, the pricing of agricultural products and foodstuffs should better reflect the costs on society and environment that currently are externalised; calls for working groups to address this issue under the Committee on the SFS;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Highlights that cooperation provisions in the Sustainable Food Systems and the Animal Welfare Chapters should be leveraged to further policy and knowledge exchange on outcomes for sustainable agricultural practices;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets that patent protection periods go beyond WTO requirements and may have negative impact in terms of access to affordable medicines;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the market-access commitments on goods, given the removal of relatively high duties on industrial products such as cars and textiles, and the commitments on services, including delivery, telecommunications, financial and international maritime transport services, have the potential to significantly boost bilateral trade; considers that the agreement promotes transparency and the use of international standards to facilitate market access, while safeguarding the levels of protection that each party deems appropriate; appreciates New Zealand’s acceptance of EU type-approval certificates and the provisions of the annex on wine and spirits, which will respectively facilitate trade in the vehicles and wine and spirits sectors; believes that the agreement has the potential to boost the green transition, by liberalizing green goods and including novel circular economy provisions; underlines that in order to facilitate trade and investment in innovative environmental goods, the FTA’s list of these goods should be subject to systematic review;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the EU and New Zealand will reciprocally open up their procurement markets beyond what is already covered under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement; calls on both Parties to adopt sustainability criteria for procurement markets in accordance with the provisions of the EU Treaty ;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls upon the Parties to establish quickly their respective Domestic Advisory Group after the entry into force of the agreement and to make sure that they will be enabled to function properly and to contribute actively to the implementation of the agreement, especially when it comes to the sustainability impacts;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2023/0038M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Commits to carefully monitoring the implementation of the agreement, in close cooperation with the Commission, the stakeholders and the EU’s New Zealand partners; urges both Parties to cooperate in international fora, especially the WTO, to accelerate the phase out and elimination of fossil fuel subsidies and to tackle trade-related transport emissions;
2023/09/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned by the Retained EU Law BillAct, which, if adopted, could bring about a number of negative consequences that could lead to creates uncertainty for businesses and stakeholders on both sides of the Channel and wcould undermine workers’ rightremove existing rights derived from EU law from workers in the UK;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 31 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the full operationalisation of the TCA’s institutional framework in 2022 and the good functioning of the joint bodies under the Agreement; regrets that the sectoral Working Groups under the Trade Specialised Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade as well as the Working Group on Security of Energy Supply have not yet been convened;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 35 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the establishment of the EU Domestic Advisory Group (DAG) in accordance with Article 13 of the TCA, composed of 24 representatives of civil society organisations and six representatives of the European Economic and Social Committee; notes that the first meeting of the EU DAG and the UK DAG was held on 3 October 2022 and welcomes the joint declaration issued as an outcome of this meeting; underlines the need for well-balanced and representative DAGs, including the proportionate representation of employers and workertrade unions, and geographical representation of all parts of the UK;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 36 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Reaffirms Parliament’s commitment to closely monitor the implementation of the TCA, in close cooperation with the EU DAG; recalls that the Commission should immediately and regularly provide Parliament with information relating to the implementation of TCA, if necessary on a confidential basis; welcomes the continued good cooperation between Parliament and the Commission;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 50 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Agrees with the Commission that the horizontal and product-specific rules in the TCA are satisfactory and that product- specific rules should not be revisited beyond technical adaptations, as these rules strike a fair balance while contributing to the Union’s overarching objective of achieving strategic autonomy in essential sectors; calls, however, for reasonable solutions to be found with regard to the upcoming changes to the rules of origin for electric vehicles, given the difficulties encountered by EU manufacturers in sourcing parts, in particular batteries, from within the EU; calls on the UK and the EU, as like-minded partners, to explore new avenues for cooperation on the supply of raw materials, the development of net-zero technologies, green corridors and efficient electricity trading arrangements and other global trade issues;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 64 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Urges the UK Government and Parliament to acknowledge the complications that would stem from any unnecessary systematic regulatory divergence, in particular in the area of the protection of employment and social rights, environment, personal data, State aid, digital trade and taxation, which could only create additional issues as regards level playing field commitments in the TCA, as well as for EU and UK businesses and EU- UK trade;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 70 #

2022/2188(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the amendment of the sunset clause in the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) BillAct which was and remains a cause of concern, and stresses that the European Parliament will continue following the legislative developments in the UK in this regard; calls for the strengthening of EU-UK regulatory cooperation to minimise likely divergences; calls on the Commission to continue to closely monitor regulatory divergences in the UK, which could pose a risk of non-compliance with the TCA, notably in areas relevant to the level playing field such as subsidy control, taxation, labour and social standards, the environment and climate; considers, in this context, that the active involvement of the DAG and the Civil Society Forum provides a valuable contribution to the process; highlights the particular challenge that monitoring and managing regulatory divergence poses for Northern Ireland;
2023/09/08
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 14 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas value chains in the garment sector are characterized by a strong unequal balance of power between international companies/brands towards their suppliers/towards their workers; and whereas workers - being at the last step of the value chain - usually end up getting the most negatively impacted; whereas the COVID-19 pandemic was a strong reminder of such inequalities;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the textiles/garment production is a major contributor to climate change and one of the greatest producers of waste;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the introduction of the digital product passport in the proposal for a regulation on ecodesign requirements for sustainable products which embeds traceability as well as social (i.e. human rights and labour rights) information; believes that in order to be relevant this passport needs to be available on the product itself and be easy to read; favours open and trustworthy data ensuring traceability down to factory level; welcomes that the UNECE (UN Economic Commission for Europe) approved in 2021 a set of standards on Traceability and transparency of sustainable value chains in the garment and footwear sector; encourages its uptake by EU-based companies;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that fast fashion puts enormous stress on suppliers and their workforce through unfair trading practices (UTPs); highlights the power asymmetry between brands and their suppliers contributing to unfair trading practices, such as unilaterally cancelling contracts or buying below production costs, that have detrimental effects on labour conditions in often non-EU low-wage countries, calls for a legislative proposal to combat unfair trading practices in the textiles sector, learning from the experience of the implementation of Directive 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in the agricultural and food supply chain;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes that the European Commission presented a EU textile strategy in line with the European green deal and the circular economy action plan; underlines in this context that especially the fast fashion sector is not sustainable as it evidently produces more than needed, which makes it essential to consider production reduction and recycling targets;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for European mandatory criteria on responsible consumption to apply togreen, socially responsible and sustainable public procurement criteria for textiles;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that certain multi- stakeholder initiatives and certifications or private labels concerning sustainability have shown shortcomings in the past, notes that important retailers were lately sanctioned for greenwashing in these types of initiatives; calls therefore for publicly strictly controlled audited initiatives and certifications;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the functioning of the internal market is greatly facilitated by the market’s adoption and use of standards; whereas the adoption of European standards simplifies compliance for market participants and national authorities, replacing as many as 34 national standards with one European standardis a pivotal element of the single market, enhancing the competitiveness of European companies and the safety of citizens; whereas the adoption of European standards and European standardisation deliverables facilitates market access, contributes to strengthen the single market and simplifies compliance for market participants and national authorities, providing a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the Union legislation;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the European standardisation system isneeds to be based on an open, inclusive, transparent, reliable, high-quality and consensus- based, market-driven approach, ensuring thatapproach, which should involve all stakeholders in a way to ensure theat standards that are developed not only to respond to industry needs but also support the interests of wider societyto fulfil sustainability requirements and to support the interests of wider society, improving economic, social and environmental conditions as well as the quality of life of citizens, in particular of the most vulnerable groups, such as persons with disabilities;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the participation of civil society in the standardisation process is guaranteed by Regulation 1025/2012, but it is limited by high costs, which create entry barriers to the stakeholders with less financial resources;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas standards, both at international and European level, can be important drivers for market development and technological change towards a climate-neutral, resource-efficient and circular economy, as well as for fair competition, innovation and greater protection of consumers and the environment; whereas the Member States, European institutions and the European standardisation organisations (ESOs) cooperate with international standardisation bodies and have agreements in place to facilitate the use of international standards in the Union; whereas although European industry is an active participant in international standardisation work streams, the effective representation of smaller companies and othersocietal stakeholders in international forums is more challengingnot adequate;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the use of open source software and hardware licensing solutions improves the effectiveness and transparency of work for public administrations and businesses and should be encouraged;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 17 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
C c. whereas the publication of public data should be based on open and standardised formats, in order to avoid ‘lock-in’ situations with proprietary solutions and in order to guarantee accountability, reproducibility, sustainability and reliability of governmental actions and public procurement;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the adoption of the standardisation strategy, which sets out five main areas for action for the Commission; considers that the classification of priority areas for action closlargely aligns with the weaknesses of the current system identified during the stakeholder consultation; notes also the adoption of, and progress on, the 2022 annual work programme on standardisationstresses, however, that such a list of areas for action should be non-exhaustive in order to quickly respond to the changing global challenges and that further focus on the uptake and implementation of standards, especially among SMEs is needed; notes also the adoption of, and progress on, the 2022 annual work programme on standardisation and looks forward to the 2023 and 2024 draft annual work programmes; stresses the need to further involve all relevant stakeholders in the interinstitutional dialogue for the preparation of the annual work programme;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the fundamental qualities of the standardisation system remain relevant and effective for the proper functioning of the internal market; recalls that harmonised standards are a voluntary, market- driven tool providing technical requirements and guidance, the use of which facilitates the compliance of goods and services with European legislation and supports the development ofimplementation of ambitious European policies in an accountable, transparent and inclusive way, ensuring that needs and specificities of all relevant stakeholders are taken into account; stresses, howemoreover, that standards cannot be seen as EU law, sinceRegulation 1025/2012 determines public law relevance of standards, which means that harmonised standards should comply with the objectives set out in the EU legislation and policies regarding the level of consumer, health, safety, environmental and data protection, and the level of social inclusion, are determined by the legislator;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 29 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that European Standardisation Organisations should comply with the EU legislation and policy objectives not only when drafting standards, but also in their governance; calls on the Commission to assess in the context of the evaluation process of Regulation 1025/2012 if the current governance model of the European Standardisation Organisations should be revised to meet such objectives and calls on the Commission to improve the participation and to strengthen the rights of the societal stakeholders, also within the national standardisation bodies;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Stresses that European Standards and European standardisation deliverables should meet the objectives of the EU Green Deal, including on climate, environmental, energy, resources-use and biodiversity targets; highlights, however, that in order to deliver on Green Deal commitments, standards should further improve product sustainability, durability, reusability, upgradability and reparability, reduce the expected generation of waste and increase recycled content in products;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 35 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2 e. Stresses that the standardisation system should prioritize areas with the highest detriment to consumers and should increase its efforts to take in due account the needs of the most vulnerable consumers, such as older persons and persons with disabilities;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 g (new)
2 g. Calls on the Commission and on the European standardisation bodies to improve their efforts towards making the standards gender responsive, in line with the Gender Responsive Standards Declaration; invites the Commission to elaborate gender indicators and criteria that could be used in standards development, in order to achieve gender balanced, representative and inclusive standards;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the launch of the High- Level Forum for Standardisation and the desire to broaden the range of voices heard when identifying standardisation priorities and needs, planning future activities and coordinating approaches ingiving suggestions to the Commission for possible reviews of existing standards, in order to meet the objectives of the European Green Deal and of the Europe Digital Decade; acknowledges that the High-Level Forum will coordinate the effective representation of EU interests and values in international standardisation bodiesfora; underlines that this expert group should include a diverse range of stakeholders, without losing sight of the bottom-up, market-driven nature of standardisation activitiesin a way to increase transparency and social impact of standards and in order to ensure the protection of the public interest and the environment;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the fact that the Forum will work to strengthen technical expertise and skills in the standardisation system, also through sub-groups of experts; highlights that these sub-groups could elaborate programmes to mainstream training activities, in order to increase skills, competences and consistency at EU level;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the Commission wishes to accelerate the steps involved in developing standards; considers that the timely preparation of standarhigh-quality standards meeting market and societal needs is necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market, in particular in the case of harmonised standards;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Recalls that standardisation requests are issued by the Commission, in line with EU legislation and policies that underpin the protection of consumers, health, safety, environment, data and that guarantee social inclusion; notes, in this context, that the role of European Standardisation Organisations is to meet such requests, in order to support the public interest’s objectives set out in the EU legislation;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that there may be inherent limits to speeding up the standardisation process, as the prepadraftiong of standards, and citation of harmonised standards and industry implementation of those standards all add time before market adoption; recognises that it may be easier to accelerate administrative tasks, such as citation in the Official Journal, butthe publication of the harmonised standard’s reference in the Official Journal of the European Union; highlights that uptaking existing standards rather than drafting new ones would also have positive effects on timing and it would allow for easier understanding and implementation; points out, however, that the unduly rushed preparation or deployment of standards creates challenges for all stakeholders, including national authorities; encourages the Commission, in conjunction with improvements to its own internal processes, to continue working with the ESOs on ways of achieving timely delivery, including consideration of the most suitable standardisation deliverable depending on the needimportant issues for all stakeholders, including national authorities, since technical aspects and contributions require time to be elaborated by all stakeholders involved in the consensus-building process; stresses the important role on speeding up the standardisation process of the High- Level Forum for Standardisation and of the EU excellence hub, which should take a proactive approach to allow for a timely identification of standardisation needs and should help striking a fair balance between the need to shorten the process and the necessity to ensure open, inclusive, sustainable, reliable and high- quality standards; encourages the Commission, in conjunction with improvements to its own internal processes, to continue working with the ESOs on ways of achieving timely delivery, including early exchange of information on the content and feasibility of planned standardization requests and the consideration of the most suitable standardisation deliverable depending on the need; welcomes in this context the action plan of the Task Force “Timely European Standards for a Green and Digital, Single and Global Market” between the Commission, EFTA and the ESOs;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Stresses the need for stable and clear criteria for the assessment of harmonised standards, commonly understood by all stakeholders, as well as for the provision of the necessary resources to ensure the timely assessment and citation, in particular with regards to the work of the HAS consultants;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that anthe evaluation of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012 may identifythat was launched in 2022 should identify best practices and areas where reform is needed beyond the targeted amendment already introduced by the Commission; considers that the role, participation and input of relevant stakeholders, including those representing, inter alia, SMEs and environmental, social and consumer interests, should be evaluated and strengthened where such reforms may be beneficialstrengthened in order to ensure that core interests and values of the EU citizens are adequately represented and in order to support and complementary to the work envisaged by the ESOs following the Commission’s call for them to present proposals to reform their own internal governance; notes that such a reform should address the uneven and non-transparent representation of industrial interests while ensuring inclusiveness and effective participation of societal stakeholders, which should be implemented beyond the simple obligation of efforts, as defined in Articles 5 and 16 of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012, also taking into account the results of the consensus-building process;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Acknowledges that only a limited number of civil society organisations participate in the European and national standardisation work; believes that, in view of increasing the participation of civil society and broadening the scope of Annex III of Regulation 1025/2012, the Commission should carry out a mapping of civil society organisations which have an interest in contributing to the standardisation work at European level;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the focus on national- level involvement of wider stakeholders in standardisation activities; notes that not all organisations listed in Annex III have national counterparts in the Member States; considers that the Commission may direct funding or technicall Member States that are able to participate in the work of the national mirror committees; stresses the diversity of practices in defining membership conditions by national standardization bodies in Europe, including participation fees; considers that the Commission should increase technical support and direct funding in order to guarantee substantial, long-term and stable financial support to thosee European organisations to ensure participation in national standardisation activities, including not only technical work on standards, but also the preparation of positions vis-à-vis standardisation requests at the European and international levels, thereby reinforcing the inclusivity of the process as a wholelisted in Annex III and to ensure the effective participation of their national organisations in national standardisation activities on an equal footing with industry representatives, including not only technical work on standards, but also the preparation of positions vis-à-vis standardisation requests at the European and international levels, thereby ensuring that their interests and inputs are duly taken into account and reinforcing the inclusivity of the process as a whole; invites the Commission to assess whether the Member States should support the funding to the European organisations listed in Annex III in order to foster a harmonised approach in the EU;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Points out that the financial support of the Commission could not be sufficient for the European organisations listed in Annex III to ensure the effective participation of their national organisations in national standardisation activities on an equal footing with industry representatives; stresses that in some Member States national standardisation bodies have already established solidarity mechanisms in which industrial stakeholders contribute to the participation fee of societal stakeholders according to certain elements, such as the size and the turnover of the company; calls on the Commission and on the European standardisation organizations to encourage the harmonisation of such a mechanisms, in order to decrease the fragmentation of the single market;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Notes that the inclusiveness of the European and international standardisation systems also depends on the ability of stakeholders to identify and staff the standardization areas and committees that are relevant to them; considers that the national authorities should support national standardisation bodies initiatives for stakeholder inclusiveness, including providing these stakeholders with assistance in identifying standardization areas and committees that are relevant to them;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recognises the need for a consistent and harmonised approach towards technical or common specifications, in particular as different legislative processes may give rise to divergent provisions; considers, therefore, that this mechanism should only be used in exceptional circumstances and only while relevant standards do not exist; expresses concern about technical specifications concerning, among other things, respect for fundamental rights, where recourse to implementing acts affects the co-legislators’ powers of scrutinyensure the involvement of all relevant stakeholders and that it should generally be used in the absence of harmonised standards and when standards developed by European Standardisation Organisations are not deemed adequate by the Commission to support EU law;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Stresses that the role of standards is not to define fundamental rights, but to provide technical solutions for their respect; calls on the Commission and on the co-legislators to further detail in legislation key aspects for the respect of fundamental rights, including safeguards and definitions; points out that when standards are not adopted timely or are not fit for purpose, common specifications should be introduced in order to ensure the full respect of fundamental rights;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that divergent regulatory outcomes may also affect the standardisation process more generally, owing to differing terminology, the lack of standard clauses for standardisation requests and difficulties in ex ante oversight; underlines that this problem is even more significant where standards are relevant for more than one regulatory act; believes that a common approach or formalised agreement between the Commission and the co-legislators could be explored in order to streamline the preparation of standards and detailed conditions for technical specifications;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Welcomes the launch of a peer review process among Member States and national standardisation bodies to exchange good practices and propose new ideas for a more effective involvement of civil society and users, as well as to set up SMEs-friendly conditions for standardisation;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. BRecognises the strategic use of international standards to promote global leadership in critical areas such as green and digital technologies and the need for the EU to ensure its competitiveness, security and strategic autonomy; believes that it is essential to improve European coordination and engagement at international level in relation to standardisation, while respecting the right of national delegations to reach their own decisions in international forumith like-minded global partners that share the EU’s social, environmental and ethical values; considers, nevertheless, that where similar viewpoints exist, and are also shared with like-minded third- country partners, European policy leadership on standards development can act as a multiplier for European industrial leadershipand societal leadership; is of the opinion that the Commission should set high-level principles to determine if, according to the EU strategic interest, a certain standard should be developed in the European Standardisation Organisations or at international level;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Regrets that the effective contribution of societal stakeholders in the international standardisation processes continues to be a major challenge; stresses that the participation of the organisations listed in Annex III should be guaranteed in the technical committees and should not depend on the decision of each committee, which can result in the exclusion of stakeholders representing the interests of consumers, workers and the environment; calls on the Commission and on the European Standardisation Organisations to engage with international counterparts and like- minded trade partners to ensure greater inclusiveness of the international standardisation system and stronger representation of all stakeholders;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that prioritising standardisation matters in cooperation with third countries in bi-, multi- and pluri- lateral settings is also important to ensure that like-minded, inclusive approaches towards standardisation can prevail at international level; encourages, in this regard, the Commission and the CSO to develop key performance indicators, to monitor commitments and developments on standardisation between the Union and third countries;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Regrets that the EU was not able to take the lead in drafting international standards in very sensitive areas, such as green and digital transition and internet protocols; is worried that technical solutions, often incompatible with the EU’s values and interests, were approved in the international technical committees, endangering the EU objective to promote a free, open, accessible, inclusive and secure global internet; urges the Commission to step up its efforts to become a standard-setter in the international context also through the proposal of policy measures to foster the deployment of key internet standards and sustainability requirements;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the value of commercialisation for research activities launched under the Union’s research funding programmes, including earlythe consideration of the suitability for standardisation of projects launched under the Union’s research funding programmesat an early stage; welcomes the creation of the ‘standardisation booster’, as a test bed for standards’ suitability;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Stresses the need to unleash the full potential of EU funded pre-normative research in support of standardisation needs; calls on the Commission to encourage further coordination between National and European Standardisation bodies and the research system, in order to bridge the gap between research and the market and to ensure a proper allocation of resources; recalls that the dissemination of research results contributes to the general awareness and creates the basis for further innovation;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Acknowledges the development of the European Code of Practice for researchers on standardisation to promote an overarching approach to standardisation activities; calls on the Commission to ensure that those activities will be in line with EU policy objectives and strategic interests, in particular with the EU Green Deal commitments, and that the achievements in the area of research and innovation will be taken into account by the EU excellence hub;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Notes that standards will rely more and more on machine-readable formats rather than on simple texts; calls on the European Standardisation Organisations and on the National Standardisation Bodies to concretely support this transition by ensuring that these formats will be interoperable and reliable and by integrating open source software solutions into their activities, in order to facilitate the uptaking of digital technologies by public administrations and businesses, in particular SMEs and microenterprises;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18 d. Is of the opinion that open standards are essential to develop innovative solutions and open government policies, including on public procurement, based on transparency, accountability, sustainability and reliability; believes, therefore, that documents and data should be published in open, standardised formats that are easy to implement;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 e (new)
18 e. Believes that the Commission should make additional efforts on setting open, inclusive, sustainable, reliable and high-quality ICT standards that ensure interoperability, accessibility and privacy- by-design solutions;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 150 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Supports the development of awareness-raising and training programmes, including life-long learning programmes, vocational education and training, aimed at developing pathways towards standardisation activities for academics, future industry professionals and, policymakers and representatives of the civil society;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Notes that drafting, implementing and enforcing standards requires a high degree of technical expertise and that there is no formal education nor vocational training on standardisation in the EU, thus contributing to a lack of qualified experts in the public and private sectors; is of the opinion that this situation will be emphasized by the generational turnover and by the new digital challenges that will require more technical skills and competences and that further efforts are needed to increase knowledge and awareness among public and private stakeholders;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2022/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative to organise the Standardisation University Days to promote awareness among academia and students and to further include standardisation among the projects of the EU Academy; notes that the High-Level Forum will promote development and dissemination of standardisation academic teaching modules to train young professionals in order to improve competences at operational level; encourages Member States to include relevant professional education courses on standards in their national education systems;
2023/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Designing packaging with the objective of its recycling, once it becomes packaging waste, is one the most efficient measures to improve the packaging circularity and raise packaging recycling rates and the use of recycled content in packaging. Packaging design for recycling criteria have been established for a number of packaging formats under voluntary industry schemes or by some Member States for the purpose of the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees. In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and provide industry with a level playing field, and with the objective to promote the sustainability of packaging, it is important to set mandatory requirements regarding the recyclability and reusability of packaging, by harmonising the criteria and the methodology for assessing packaging recyclability and reusability based on a design for recycling methodology at the Union level. In order to meet the objective set out in the CEAP that, by 2030, all packaging should be recyclable orand reusable, in an economically viable manner, packaging recyclability performance grades should be established based on design for recycling criteria for packaging categories as listed in Annex II. However, packaging should comply with them only as of 1 January 2030 in order to give sufficient time to the economic operators to adapt.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) An expert group should be set up with a balanced participation of representatives from Member States and all interested parties involved in packaging value chain, such as waste treatment operators, manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, retailers, importers, SMEs, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations. This group should contribute in particular to prepare, develop and further detail the sustainability requirements, examining the effectiveness of the established market surveillance mechanisms and assessing any further measure to guarantee environmental sustainability of packaging and contribute to the transition to a circular economy.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Some Member States are taking action to encourage recyclability of packaging through modulation of extended producer responsibility fees; such initiatives taken at the national level may create regulatory uncertainty for the economic operators, in particular where they supply packaging in several Member States. At the same time, modulation of extended producer responsibility fees is an effective economic instrument to incentivise more sustainable packaging design leading to better recyclable and reusable packaging while improving the functioning of the internal market. It is therefore necessary to harmonise criteria for the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees based on the recyclabilityenvironmental performance grade obtained through recyclability and reusability assessment, while not setting the actual amounts of such fees. As the criteria should be related to the criteria on packaging recyclability, the reduction of material use and the switch to reusable packaging, it is appropriate to empower the Commission to adopt such harmonised criteria at the same time as establishing the detailed design for recycling and reusability criteria per packaging categories.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) Packaging should be designed so as to minimise its volume and weight while maintaining its ability to perform the packaging functions. The manufacturer of packaging should assess the packaging against the performance criteria, as listed in Annex IV of this Regulation. In view of the objective of this Regulation to reduce packaging and packaging waste generation and to improve circularity of packaging across the internal market, it is appropriate to further specify the existing criteria and to make them more stringent. The list of the packaging performance criteria, as listed in the existing harmonised standard EN 13428:200057 , should therefore be modified. While marketing and consumer acceptance remain relevant for packaging design, they should not be part of performance criteria justifying on their own additional packaging weight and volume. However, this should not compromise product specifications for craft and industrial products and food and agricultural products that are registered and protected under the EU geographical indication protection scheme, as part of the Union’s objective to protect cultural heritage and traditional know-how. On the other hand, recyclability, the use of recycled content, and re-use may justify additional packaging weight or volume, and should be added to the performance criteria. Packaging with double walls, false bottoms and other characteristics only aimed to increase the perceived product volume should not be placed on the market, as it does not meet the requirement for packaging minimisation. The same rule should apply to superfluous packaging not necessary for ensuring packaging functionality. __________________ 57 Packaging – Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition – Prevention by source reduction.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) To promote the circularity and sustainable use of packaging, reusable packaging and systems for re-use should be incentivised. For that purpose, it is necessary to clarify the notion of reusable packaging and to ensure that it is linked not only to the packaging design, which should enable a maximum number of trips or rotations and maintaining the safety, quality and hygiene requirements when being emptied, unloaded, refilled or reloaded, but also to the setting up of systems for re-use respecting minimum requirements as set out in this Regulation. In order to facilitate conformity assessment with requirements on reusable packaging, it is necessary to provide for presumption of conformity for packaging which is in conformity with harmonised standards adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements with design for reusable packaging guidelines and define reusable packaging criteria and formats, including minimum number of trips or rotations, standardised designs, as well as requirements for systems for re-use, including hygiene requirements. The Commission should evaluate capacities and trajectories of urban and industrial waste water re-use in light of the need to balance ambitious and much needed targets for reduced resource consumption, targets for waste reduction, GHG emissions, and prioritisation of water use.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) It is necessary to inform consumers in a clear and intelligible manner, which is fully accessible by persons with disabilities, and to enable them to appropriately dispose of packaging waste, including compostable lightweight and very lightweight plastic carrier bags. The most appropriate manner to do this is to establish a harmonised labelling system based on the material composition of packaging for sorting of waste, and to pair it with corresponding labels on waste receptacles. The labelling system should also inform consumers about substances in packaging that may be hazardous, in line with relevant CLP labelling requirements.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 176 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Labelling of recycled content in packaging should not be mandatory as this information is not critical to ensure the proper end-of-life treatment of packaging. However, mcould have an impact on the purchase decisions of consumers. Manufacturers will be required to meet recycled content targets under this Regulation and they may wishhave to display that information on their packaging to inform consumers thereof. To ensure that this information is communicated in a harmonised manner across the Union, a label to indicate the recycled content should be harmonised.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52 a (new)
(52a) Manufacturers should exercise due diligence prior to placing packaging into the Union market or exporting packaging to third countries, in order to ensure environmental impacts of the packaging is minimised. Materials used for packaging should comply with the relevant EU laws governing the production of such materials.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) It should be ensured that suppliers of packaging or packaging materials provide the manufacturer with all the information and documentation necessary for the manufacturer to demonstrate the conformity of the packaging and the packaging materials. That information and documentation should be provided in either paper or electronic form.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) When placing packaging on the market, every importer should indicate on the packaging their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as their postal address, telephone number and, where available, electronic means of communication through which it can be contacted. Exceptions should be provided for in cases where the packaging does not allow for such indications.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) As distributors and importers are close to the marketplace and have an important role in ensuring packaging compliance, they should be involved in market surveillance tasks carried out by the competent national authorities, and should be prepared to participate actively, providing those authorities with all necessary information relating to the productackaging concerned.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) Any importer or distributor that either places on the market packaging under their own name or trademark, or modifies such a productackaging in such a way that compliance with this Regulation might be affected, should be considered to be the manufacturer and should assume the manufacturer’s obligations.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 225 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 124
(124) Packaging should be placed on the market only if it does not present a known risk to the environment and, human health. and to other aspects of public interest protection. In order to better align with the specific nature of sustainability requirements and to ensure that the focus of market surveillance efforts is on non- compliance with such requirements, packaging presenting a risk should, for the purposes of this Regulation, be defined as packaging that, by not complying with a sustainability requirement or because a responsible economic operator does not comply with a sustainability requirement, may adversely affect the environment or other public interests protected by the relevant requirements.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 135
(135) To enhance public trust in packaging placed on the market, in particular as regards compliance with sustainability requirements, the economic operators placing non-compliant packaging on the market or who do not comply with their obligations should be subject to penalties. It is therefore necessary that Member States lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in national law for failure to comply with this Regulation. To facilitate more consistent application of penalties, common non- exhaustive criteria should be established for determining the types and levels of penalties to be imposed in case of infringements of this Regulation. These criteria should include, inter alia, the nature and gravity of the infringement and the economic benefits derived from and the environmental damage caused by the infringement, insofar as these can be determined.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 51 a (new)
(51a) ‘digital library system’ means a system by which an economic operator individually tracks packaging that can be borrowed by consumers for free for a given period of time;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 257 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Expert Group on packaging and of packaging waste 1. An Expert Group on Packaging and Packaging Waste (‘the Expert Group’) is hereby established. 2. The purpose of the Expert Group is to support the Commission, in particular in preparing, developing and further detailing sustainability requirements, examining the effectiveness of the market surveillance mechanisms and assessing any further measure to guarantee environmental sustainability of packaging and contribute to the transition to a circular economy. 3. The Expert Group shall guarantee a balanced participation of stakeholders and right-holders with adequate experience in packaging and packaging waste. Representatives from Member States and all interested parties should be equally involved, including waste treatment operators, manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, retailers, importers, SMEs, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
From [OP: Please insert the date = 42 months after the entry into force of this Regulation], packaging shall be marked with a label containing information on its material composition. This obligation does not apply to transport packaging. However, it applies to e-commerce packaging and the destination of each component of the packaging, as well as on the presence of substances of concern. This label shall serve the purpose of a uniform and intelligible information for all consumers, including for persons with disabilities.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 356 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Packaging subject to deposit and return systems referred to in Article 44(1) shall, in addition to the labelling referred to in the first subparagraph, be marked with a harmonised label established in the relevant implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 5. It is essential that the packaging-related labelling information work with the hazard and safety-related CLP labelling requirements. Therefore, it should be clear which labelling refers to the packaging and which relates to the product inside the packaging. All labelling must be clearly visible, readable and fully accessible by persons with disabilities.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 366 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. From [OP: Please insert the date = 48 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], reusable packaging placed on the market shall bear a label on packaging reusability and. The tracking of the packaging and the calculation of trips and rotations can be proved via a QR code or other type of digital data carrier that provides further information on packaging reusability including the availability of a system for re-use and of collection points, and that facilitates the tracking of the packaging and the calculation of trips and rotationss well as using statistical statements based on inventory data. In addition, reusable sales packaging shall be clearly identified and distinguished from single use packaging at the point of sale.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Where a unit of pPackaging covered by Article 7 ishall be marked with a label containing information on the share of recycled content, that label shall comply with the specifications laid down in the relevant implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 11(5) and shall be based on the methodology pursuant to Article 7(7). Where a unit of plastic packaging is marked with a label containing information on the share of biobased plastic content, that label shall comply with the specifications laid down in the relevant implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 11(5).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 402 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. By [OP: Please insert the date = 182 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts to establish a harmonised label and specifications for the labelling requirements and formats for the labelling of packaging referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 and the labelling of waste receptacles referred to in Article 12. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 408 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. By [OP: Please insert the date = 2418 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall adopt implementing acts to establish the methodology for identifying the material composition of packaging referred to in paragraph 1 by means of digital marking technologies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 443 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Manufacturers shall keepdraw up and keep up to date the technical documentation referred to in Annex VII and the EU declaration of conformity for at least 10 years after the packaging has been placed on the market.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 447 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Manufacturers shall ensure that procedures are in place for series production of packaging to remain in conformity with this Regulation. Changes in packaging design or in characteristics, as well as changes in harmonised standards, common technical specifications or other technical specifications by reference to which conformity is declared or by application of which its conformity is verified, shall be adequately taken into account by manufacturers. In case the manufacturers finds that the packaging’s conformity may be affected, they shall carry out without undue delay a re- assessment in accordance with the conformity assessment procedure specified in Article 33 and Annex VII, or have it carried out on their behalf.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 451 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. Manufacturers shall indicate on the packaging or on a QR code or another data carrier their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as the postal address, the telephone number and where available, the electronic means of communication, where they can be contacted. Where that is not possible, the required information shall be provided as part of the information through the QR code referred to in Article 11(2) or the data carrier referred to in Article 11(4) or in a document accompanying the packaged product. The postal address shall indicate a single point at which the manufacturer can be contacted. Such information shall be clear, understandable and legible.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 454 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7
7. Manufacturers shall ensure that information provided in accordance with paragraphs 5 and 6 is clear, understandable and legible, legible and accessible for persons with disabilities, and does not replace, obscure or can be confused with information required by other Union legislation on the labelling of the packaged product.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 456 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 8
8. Manufacturers who consider or have reason to believe that packaging which they have placed on the market is not in conformity with one or more of the applicable requirements set out in Articles 5 to 11 shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring that packaging into conformity, to withdraw it or recall it, as appropriate. Manufacturers shall immediately inform their distributors and the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which they made the packaging available of the suspected non- compliance and of any corrective measures taken.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 461 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9
9. Manufacturers shall, further to a reasoned request from a national authority, provide all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the packaging, including the technical documentation in a language, or languages, which can be easily understood by that authority. That information and documentation shall be provided in either paper or electronic form. The relevant documents shall be made available within 10 days of receipt of the request from the national authority. Manufacturers shall cooperate with the national authority on any action taken to remedy any case of non-compliance with the requirements set out in Articles 5 to 10.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 464 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. If manufacturers fail to cooperate with market surveillance authorities or if the information and documentation provided is incomplete or incorrect, market surveillance authorities shall take all appropriate measures to prohibit or restrict its packaging from being available on the market, to withdraw it from the market or to recall it until the manufacturer cooperates or provides complete and correct information.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Manufacturers established outside of the Union shall ensure that its authorised representative has the necessary documentation permanently available in order to fulfil the tasks referred to in Article 15(2).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 469 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Manufacturers shall make publicly available communication channels such as a telephone number, electronic address or dedicated section of their website, taking into account accessibility needs for persons with disabilities, allowing consumers to file complaints and to inform them of risks related to their health and safety or to other aspects of public interest protection, including environmental risks, and of any serious incident involving packaging.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 470 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Manufacturers shall investigate complaints and information on incidents involving packaging they made available on the market without undue delay and shall keep an internal register of those complaints as well as of product recalls and any corrective measures taken to bring the product into conformity.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 471 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Personal data stored in the internal register of complaints shall only be those personal data that are necessary for the manufacturer to investigate the complaint. Such data shall only be kept as long as it is necessary for the purpose of investigation and no longer than five years after they have been encoded.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 473 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
AWhere a manufacturer may, by a written mandate, appoint an authorised representative. is established outside the Union, the packaging may only be made available on the Union market if the manufacturer appoints, by a written mandate, an authorised representative which is established in the Union.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 477 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) further to a reasoned request from a national authority, provide that authority with a copy of the mandate and with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of packaging in a language or languages, which can be easily understood by that authority;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 478 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) immediately inform the manufacturer if the authorised representative has a reason to believe that a packaging presents a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, including environmental risks, or if it is aware of any serious incident involving a packaging;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 479 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(c b) immediately inform the manufacturer about complaints received by consumers;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 481 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) terminate the mandate if the manufacturer acts contrary to its obligations under this Regulation. and immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which is established;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 482 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) in case of change of authorised representative, the detailed arrangements for the change shall be clearly defined in an agreement between the manufacturer, where practicable the outgoing authorised representative, and the incoming authorised representative. That agreement shall address at least the date of termination of the mandate of the outgoing authorised representative and date of beginning of the mandate of the incoming authorised representative, as well as the transfer of documents, including confidentiality aspects and property rights.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 484 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point -a (new)
(-a) the manufacturer is identified and an authorised representative in accordance with Article 15 has been appointed;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 486 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Importers shall indicate on the packaging their name and their registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as the postal address, the telephone number and, where available, the electronic means of communication, where they can be contacted. Where that is not possible, the required information shall be provided via the data carrier or in a document accompanying the packaged product. The contact details shall be clear, understandable and legible.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 487 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Importers shall ensure that information provided in accordance with paragraph 3 is clear, understandable and legible, legible and accessible for persons with disabilities, and does not replace, obscure or can be confused with information required by other Union legislation on the labelling of the packaged product.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 6
6. Importers who consider or have reason to believe that packaging, which they have placed on the market, is not in conformity with the applicable requirements set out in Articles 5 to 11 or presents a risk to the environment or human health, shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring that packaging into conformity, to withdraw it or recall it, as appropriate.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 489 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. Importers shall immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made the packaging available, as well as the manufacturer and where applicable, the authorised representative, of the suspected risk or non- compliance and of any corrective measures taken.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 491 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 10
10. Importers shall cooperate with the competent national authority and with the manufacturer and, where applicable, with the manufacturer’s authorised representative, on any action taken to remedy any case of non- compliance with the requirements set out in Articles 5 to 11.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 493 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. If importers fail to cooperate with market surveillance authorities or if the information and documentation provided is incomplete or incorrect, market surveillance authorities shall take all appropriate measures to prohibit or restrict its packaging from being available on the market, to withdraw it from the market or to recall it until importers cooperate or provide complete and correct information.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 494 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Importers shall verify whether the communication channels referred to in Article 13(9c), are publicly available to consumers allowing them to submit complaints and communicate any risk related to their health and safety or to other aspects of public interest protection, including environmental risks, and of any serious incident involving packaging. If such channels are not available, the importer shall provide for them, taking into account accessibility needs for persons with disabilities.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 495 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Personal data stored in the internal register of complaints shall only be those personal data that are necessary for the importer to investigate the complaint. Such data shall only be kept as long as it is necessary for the purpose of investigation and no longer than five years after they have been encoded.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 505 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where a distributor, before making packaging available on the market, considers or has reason to believe that the packaging is not in conformity with the requirements set out in Articles 5 to 11 or presents a risk to the environment or human health or that the manufacturer is not complying with those applicable requirements, the distributor shall not make the packaging available on the market until it has been brought into conformity or until the manufacturer complies.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 508 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Distributors shall immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made the packaging available as well as the manufacturer and where applicable, the authorised representative of the suspected non- compliance and of any corrective measures taken.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 510 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Distributors that have received complaints from consumers about suspected incidents involving packaging they made available on the market, shall immediately forward this information to the manufacturer and, where applicable, the manufacturer’s authorised representative and the importer. They shall keep a register of complaints, of non-conforming packaging and of recalls and withdrawals, and keep the manufacturer and, where available, the authorised representative and the importer informed of such monitoring and provide them with any information upon their request.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 513 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – title
Case in which obligations of manufacturers apply to importers and distribuother economic operators
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 514 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
An importer or a distributoeconomic operator other than the manufacturer shall be considered a manufacturer for the purposes of this Regulation and shall be subject to the obligations of the manufacturer under Article 14, where they place packaging on the market under their own name or trademark or modify packaging already placed on the market in a way that may affect compliance with the relevant requirements of this Regulation.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 579 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 4
4. By drawing up the EU declaration of conformity, the manufacturer assumes responsibility for the compliance of the packaging with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and with all applicable Union acts.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 584 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Providers of online platforms, falling within the scope of Section 4 of Chapter 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with producers shall obtain the following information from producers offering packaging to consumers located in the Union prior to allowing them to conclude sales on their platform or use their services:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 590 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that extended producer responsibility schemes for packaging dedicate a minimum of 10% of their budget to finance systems for re-use.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 620 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 63 – paragraph 1
By [OP: Please insert the date = 85 years after the date of application of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and of its contribution to the functioning of the internal market and the improvement of the environmental sustainability of packaging. The Commission shall present a report on the main findings of that evaluation to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Member States shall provide the Commission with the information necessary for the preparation of that report.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Furthermore, in cases where the disruptions might affect the conformity assessment bodies or in cases where the testing capacities for such crisis-relevant products would not be sufficient, it is appropriate to provide for the possibility for the national competent authorities to exceptionally and temporarily authorise those products for a maximum period of six months, following consultation of pertinent stakeholders and expert groups, the placing on the market of products, which have not undergone the usual conformity assessment procedures required by the respective EU sectoral legislation. The products should nevertheless comply with the applicable safety requirements, social and environmental legislation laid down in relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) In order to ensure transparency about the products being placed on the market in one Member State in a state of emergency under the presumption of conformity, a traceability tool should give economic operators, market surveillance authorities and consumers the transparency and information needed about a product and its conformity. To enable regular monitoring of crisis relevant goods and goods that risk on becoming crisis-relevant, a traceability tool therefore should cover these products.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) As regards products falling within the scope of those Regulations that have been designated as crisis-relevant goods, the national competent authorities should be able, in the context of an ongoing Single Market emergency, to derogate from the obligation to carry out those conformity assessment procedures laid down in those Regulations, in those cases where the involvement of a notified body is mandatory and should be able to issue authorisations for those products, provided that they comply with all the applicable essential safety requirements, environmental and social requirements as well as the precautionary principle. Compliance with those substantive requirements may be demonstrated by various means, which may include testing performed by the national authorities of samples provided by the manufacturer having applied for an authorisation. The specific procedures, which were followed to demonstrate the compliance and their results should be clearly described in the authorisation issued by the national competent authority.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Where a Single Market emergency entails an exponential increase in the demand for certain products and in order to support the efforts of economic operators to meet such demand, it is appropriate to provide technical references, which may be used by the manufacturers to design and produce crisis-relevant goods, which comply with the applicable essential health and safety requirements, environmental and social requirements as well the precautionary principle.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) With respect to Regulations (EU) 2016/424,23/XXX [Machinery Regulation (EU) 2016/424, 2023/XXXX [GPSR], (EU) (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426 and, (EU) 2019/1009, the competent national authorities should be able to presume that products manufactured in accordance with national or international standards within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 1025/201246ensuring an equivalent level of protection to that offered by the harmonised European standards comply with the relevant essential health and safety requirements, environmental and socialrequirements. Additionally, the precautionary principle should be applied. _________________ 46 OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Furthermore, with respect to Regulations (EU) 2016/424, (EU) 2016/425, (EU) 2016/426, (EU) 2019/1009 and (EU) No 305/2011, the Commission should have the possibility to adopt by means of implementing acts common specifications, on which the manufacturers may rely in order to benefit from a presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements. The implementing act laying down such common specifications should remain applicable for the duration of the Single Market emergency and no longer than 6 months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In order to ensure that the level of safety provided by the harmonised products is not compromised, it is necessary to provide for rules for enhanced market surveillance, in particular with respect to goods designated as crisis- relevant and including by enabling closer cooperation and mutual support among the market surveillance authorities. Additionally, a traceability tool should cover these products giving economic operators, market surveillance authorities and consumers the transparency and information needed about a product and its conformity.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) In accordance with its established practice, the Commission would systematically consult the relevant sectoral experts and social partners in the context of the early preparation of all draft implementing acts laying down common specifications.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 41c–paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
1. By way of derogation from Article 18, any competent national authority may authorise, on a duly justified request, the placing on the market or the incorporation into a cableway installation within the territory of the Member State concerned, of a specific subsystem or safety component which has been designated as crisis- relevant good and for which the conformity assessment procedures requiring the mandatory involvement of a notified body, referred to in Article 18 have not been carried out by a notified body but for which the compliance with all the applicable essential requirements has been demonstratedincluding social and environmental requirements has been demonstrated as well as the precautionary principle. Those authorisations shall be valid for a maximum of six months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
The manufacturer of a subsystem or safety component subject to the authorisation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare on his sole responsibility that the subsystem or safety component concerned complies with all the applicable essential requirements set out in Annex II, and applicable environmental and social legislation and the precautionary principle and shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all the conformity assessment procedures indicated by the national competent authority.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5

Article 1 – paragraph 1
Traceability 1. For products admitted under Article 26 in regulation 2679/98, and after consulting the Consumer Safety Network, relevant expert groups and relevant stakeholders, the Commission shall set up a system of traceability to which economic operators who place and make available those products on the market shall adhere. 2. The system of traceability shall consist of the collection and storage of data, including by electronic means, enabling the identification of the product, its components or of the economic operators involved in its supply chain, as well as in modalities to display and to access those data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents. 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to supplement this Regulation by: (a) determining the crisis relevant products, as referred to in paragraph 1; (b) specifying the type of data which economic operators are to collect and store by means of the system of traceability referred to in paragraph 2; (c) specifying the modalities to display and to access data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents as referred to in paragraph 2; (d) specifying the actors that shall have access to the data as referred to in point (b) and to what data they shall have access, including consumers, economic operators, providers of online marketplaces, competent national authorities, the Commission, and public interest organisations, or any organisation acting on their behalf. 4. Market surveillance authorities, consumers, economic operators and other relevant actors shall have access to the data referred to in paragraph 3 based on their respective access rights set out in the applicable delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 3, point (d). 5. When adopting the measures referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission shall take into account: (a) an adequate timeframe to allow economic operators to prepare for those measures; and (b) the compatibility and interoperability with other product traceability systems already set up at Union or at international level.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(a) a description of the procedures, by means of which compliance with the applicable essential requirements and social and environmental legislation as well as the precautionary principle was successfully demonstrated;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5

Article 1 – paragraph 1
5. By way of derogation from Articles 7 and 20, subsystems or safety components, for which an authorisation has been granted in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, shall not leave be labelled withe territory ofhe CE marking and shall be traceable via a traceability tool as laid down in Article XX also when leaving the Member Sstate which has issued the authorisation and shall not bear the CE marking.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that, for the purposes of placing on the market, their competent authorities consider that subsystems and safety components, which comply with the relevant international standards or any national standards in force in the Member State of manufacture, ensuring the safety level required by the essential requirements set out in Annex II, as well as applicable environmental and social legislation and the precautionary principle, comply with those essential requirements in either of the following cases:
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5

Article 1 – paragraph 1
4. By way of derogation from Article 43a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the subsystems or safety components covered by the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the health or safety of persons, or the environment, the subsystems or safety components in compliance with the said common specifications which have been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] and for a maximum of 6 months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
1. In exceptional and duly justified cases, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing mandatory common specifications to cover the essential requirements set out in Annex II and social and environmental applicable legislation and the precautionary principle, for subsystems or safety components, which have been designated as crisis- relevant goods.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prioritise the market surveillance activities for subsystems and safety components designated as crisis-relevant goods. To enable regular monitoring of crisis relevant goods and goods that risk on becoming crisis-relevant, a traceability tool therefore shall cover these products as laid out in the following Article.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
1 a. Traceability 1. For products admitted under Article 26 of regulation, and after consulting the Consumer Safety Network, relevant expert groups and relevant stakeholders, the Commission shall set up a system of traceability to which economic operators who place and make available those products on the market shall adhere. 2. The system of traceability shall consist of the collection and storage of data, including by electronic means, enabling the identification of the product, its components or of the economic operators involved in its supply chain, as well as in modalities to display and to access those data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents. 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to supplement this Regulation by: (a) determining the crisis relevant products, as referred to in paragraph 1; (b) specifying the type of data which economic operators are to collect and store by means of the system of traceability referred to in paragraph 2; (c) specifying the modalities to display and to access data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents as referred to in paragraph 2; (d) specifying the actors that shall have access to the data as referred to in point (b) and to what data they shall have access, including consumers, economic operators, providers of online marketplaces, competent national authorities, the Commission, and public interest organisations, or any organisation acting on their behalf. 4. Market surveillance authorities, consumers, economic operators and other relevant actors shall have access to the data referred to in paragraph 3 based on their respective access rights set out in the applicable delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 3, point (d). 5. When adopting the measures referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission shall take into account: (a) an adequate timeframe to allow economic operators to prepare for those measures; and (b) the compatibility and interoperability with other product traceability systems already set up at Union or at international level.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
The manufacturer of a PPE subject to the authorisation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare on his sole responsibility that the PPE concerned complies with all the applicable essential health and safety requirements, environmental and social requirements as well as the precautionary principle and shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all the conformity assessment procedures indicated by the national competent authority.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
The manufacturer shall also deploy all reasonable measures to ensure that the PPE, which has been granted an authorisation pursuant to paragraph 1 does notcan leave the territory of the Member State, which issued the authorisation but shall be traceable with the traceability tool in Article XX.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(a) a description of the procedures, by means of which the compliance with the applicable essential health and safety requirements, environmental and social requirements as well as the precautionary principle was successfully demonstrated;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
(c) an end date of validity of the authorisation, which cannot go beyond the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated; and no longer than 6 months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
5. By way of derogation from Articles 7 and 17, PPE, for which an authorisation has been granted in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, shall notcan leave the territory of the Member State but followed by the traceability tool as laid out in Article XX which has issued the authorisation and shall not bear labelled with the CE marking.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that, for the purposes of placing on the market, their competent authorities consider that the PPE, which complies with the relevant international standards or any national standards in force in the Member State of manufacture, ensuring the safety level required by the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex II, applicable social and environmental legislation and the precautionary principle, complies with those essential health and safety requirements in either of the following cases:
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 43c – paragraph 5
(b) where severe disruptions in the functioning of the Single Market, which were taken into consideration when activating the Single Market emergency mode in accordance with Article 15(4) of [the SMEI Regulation], significantly restrict the possibilities of manufacturers to make use of the harmonised standards covering the relevant essential health and safety requirements, as well as applicable environmental and social legislation and the precautionary principle set out in Annex II to this Regulation and already published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. Where PPE, have been designated as crisis-relevant goods, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for such PPE to cover the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex II, social and environmental requirements, the precautionary principle in either of the following cases:
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted following a consultation of the sectoral experts and in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 44(3). They shall remain applicable to PPE placed on the market until the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode remains active and for a maximum of six months. In the early preparation of the draft implementing act establishing the common specification, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectoral Union legislation. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft implementing act.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
3. Without prejudice to Article 14, PPE which are in conformity with common specifications adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article shall be presumed to be in conformity with the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex II, social and environmental requirements as well as the precautionary principle covered by those common specifications or parts thereof.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
4. By way of derogation from Article 41a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the PPE covered by the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the health or safety of persons, and the environment, the PPE in compliance with those common specifications which has been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation].
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
5. When a Member State considers that a common specification referred to in paragraph 1 does not entirely satisfy the essential health and safety requirements which it aims to cover and which are set out in Annex II, applicable environmental and social legislation and the precautionary principle, it shall inform the Commission thereof with a detailed explanation and the Commission shall assess that information and, if appropriate, amend or withdraw the implementing act establishing the common specification in question.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
3. By way of derogation from Article 41a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the PPE covered by the mandatory common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the environment, health or safety of persons, the PPE in compliance with those common specifications which has been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation]. The compliance shall be deemed for a maximum of six months in total.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1

Article 1– paragraph 1

Article 1– paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prioritise the market surveillance activities for PPE designated as crisis-relevant goods. and shall use the traceability tool as laid out in Article XX
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. By way of derogation from Article 14, any competent national authority may authorise, on a duly justified request, the placing on the market or putting into service within the territory of the Member State concerned, of a specific appliance or fitting which has been designated as crisis- relevant good and for which the conformity assessment procedures requiring the mandatory involvement of a notified body, referred to in Article 14, have not been carried out by a notified body but for which the compliance with all the applicable essential requirements and social and environmental requirements and the fulfilment of the precautionary principle has been demonstrated.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
The manufacturer of an appliance or a fitting subject to the authorisation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare on his sole responsibility that the appliance or the fitting concerned complies with all the applicable essential requirements set out in Annex I and social and environmental requirements and the fulfilment of the precautionary principle and shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all the conformity assessment procedures indicated by the national competent authority.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(c) an end date of validity of the authorisation, which cannot go beyond the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated, and which shall be no longer than 6 months;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
5. By way of derogation from Articles 6 and 17, appliances or fittings, for which an authorisation has been granted in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, shall notbe traced by the traceability tool as described in Article XX especially when leaveing the territory of the Member State which has issued the authorisation and shall not bear the CE marking.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that, for the purposes of placing on the market or putting into service, their competent authorities consider that appliances and fittings, which comply with relevant international standards or any national standards in force in the Member State of manufacture, ensuring the safety level required by the essential requirements set out in Annex I and applicable social and environmental requirements as the precautionary principle, comply with those essential requirements in either of the following cases:
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted following a consultation of the sectoral experts and in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(3). They shall apply to appliances and fittings placed on the market no longer than until the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode remains active but for a maximum period of six months. In the early preparation of the draft implementing act establishing the common specification, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectoral Union legislation. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft implementing act.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
4. .By way of derogation from Article 40a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the appliances or fittings covered by the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the environment, health or safety of persons, the appliances or fittings in compliance with those common specifications which have been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] and no longer than 6 months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
5. When a Member State considers that a common specification referred to in paragraph 1 does not entirely satisfy the essential requirements which it aims to cover and which are set out in Annex I and social and environment requirements and the precautionary principle, it shall inform the Commission thereof with a detailed explanation and the Commission shall assess that information and, if appropriate, amend or withdraw the implementing act establishing the common specification in question.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The Member States shall prioritise the market surveillance activities for appliances and fittings designated as crisis- relevant goods. They shall be supported by the traceability tool as laid down in Article XX.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
The manufacturer of a fertilising product subject to the authorisation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare on his sole responsibility that the fertilising product concerned complies with the requirements set out in Annexes I and II and applicable social and environmental legislation and the precautionary principle and shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all the conformity assessment procedures indicated by the national competent authority.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
The manufacturer shall also deploy all reasonable measures to ensure that the fertilising product, which has been granted an authorisation pursuant to paragraph 1 does notshall use the traceability as laid down in Article XX, especially when leaveing the territory of the Member State, which issued the authorisation.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 140 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(a) a description of the procedures, by means of which compliance with the applicable essential requirements and social and environmental requirement and the precautionary principle was successfully demonstrated;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(c) an end date of validity of the authorisation, which cannot go beyond the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated and for a total of six months;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted following a consultation of the sectoral experts and in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(3). They shall apply to EUfertilising products placed on the market until the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode remains active in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] and for a total of six months. In the early preparation of the draft implementing acts establishing the common specification, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectoral Union legislation. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft implementing act.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
4. By way of derogation from Article 41a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the fertilising products covered by the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the environment, health or safety of persons, the fertilising products in compliance with those common specifications which have been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] but for a total of six months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. In duly justified cases, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing mandatory common specifications for EU fertilising products to cover the requirements set out in Annexes I and II and social and environmental requirements as well as the precautionary principle, which have been designated as crisis-relevant goods.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted following a consultation of the sectoral experts and in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(3) and they shall apply to EU fertilising products placed on the market until the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode remains active but for a total of six months. In the early preparation of the draft implementing act establishing the common specification, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectoral Union legislation. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft implementing act.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
3. By way of derogation from Article 41a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the EU fertilising products covered by the mandatory common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the environment, health or safety of persons, the fertilising products in compliance with those common specifications which have been placed on the market shall not be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] and not longer than for a maximum of six months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prioritise the market surveillance activities for fertilising products designated as crisis-relevant goods and use the traceability tool as laid down in Article XX.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. By way of derogation from Article 28(1), the competent national authority may exceptionally authorise, on a duly justified request, the placing on the market within the territory of the Member State concerned, of a specific construction product which has been designated as crisis-relevant good for which the required third-party assessment and verification of constancy of performance procedures referred to in that Article have not been carried out by a notified body.;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
The manufacturer of a construction product subject to the authorisation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare on his sole responsibility that the construction product concerned achieves the declared performance and shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all the procedures for the assessment and verification of constancy of performance indicated by the national competent authority.deleted
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
The manufacturer shall also deploy all reasonable measures to ensure that the construction product, which has been granted an authorisation pursuant to paragraph 1 douses notthe traceability tool as laid down in Article XX when leaveing the territory of the Member State, which issued the authorisation.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
(c) an end date of validity of the authorisation, which cannot go beyond the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated and for a total of six months;
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
5. Construction products, for which an authorisation has been granted in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article shall notuse the traceability tool as laid down in Article XX when leaveing the territory of the Member State which has issued the authorisation and shall not bear the CE marking.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
4. By way of derogation from Article 59a(3), first subparagraph, declaration of performance in compliance with the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article regarding construction products which have been placed on the market shall not be affected by the subsequent expiry or repeal of the implementing act, which has laid down those common specifications, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that construction products covered by those common specifications present a risk including to the environment or do not achieve the declared performance.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted following a consultation of the Standing Committee on Construction and in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 64(2a). They shall apply to construction products placed on the market until the last day of the period for which the Single Market emergency remains active and for a total of six months. In the early preparation of the draft implementing acts establishing the common specifications, the Commission shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectoral Union legislation. Based on that consultation, the Commission shall prepare the draft implementing act.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
3. By way of derogation from Article 59a(3), first subparagraph, unless there is sufficient reason to believe that the construction products covered by the mandatory common specifications referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article present a risk to the environment, health or safety of persons, the construction products in compliance with those common specifications which have been placed on the market shall be deemed compliant with this Regulation after the expiry or repeal of an implementing act adopted pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and after the expiry or deactivation of the Single Market Emergency mode in accordance with [the SMEI Regulation] but only for a maximum of six months.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2022/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prioritise the market surveillance activities for construction products designated as crisis- relevant goods use the traceability tool as laid down in Article XX.
2023/04/03
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Past crises, especially the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown that the internal market (also referred to as the Single Market and its supply chains, businesses, workers and consumers can be severely affected by such crises, and appropriate crisis management tools and coordination mechanisms are either lacking, do not cover all aspects of the Single market or do not allow for a timely response to such impacts.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of any Union wide contingency planning measures and ofclarity as to which part of the national administration to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the Single Market being cause by the crisis. In addition it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the Single market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as well as stakeholders and social partners as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Representative organisations of economic operators and social partners have suggested that economic operators did not have sufficient information on the crisis response measures of the Member States during the pandemics, partly due to not knowing where to obtain such information, partly due to language constraints and the administrative burden implied in making repeated inquiries in all the Member States, especially in a constantly changing regulatory environment. This prevented them from making informed business decisions as to what extent they may rely on their free movement rights or continue cross-border business operations during the crisis. It is necessary to improve the availability of information on national and Union level crisis response measures
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) These recent events have also highlighted the need for the Union to be better prepared for possible future crises, especially as we consider the continuaggravating effects of climate change and resulting natural disasters as well as global economic and geopolitical instabilities. Given the fact that it is not known which kind of crises could come up next and produce severe impacts on the Single Market and its supply chains in the future, it is necessary to provide for an instrument that would apply with regards to impacts on the Single Market of a wide range of crises.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Since any specific aspects of future crises that would impact the Single Market and its supply chains are hard to predict, this Regulation should provide for a general framework for anticipating, preventing, preparing for, mitigating and minimising the negative impacts which any crisis may cause on the Single Market and its supply chains. . while fully respecting and safeguarding fundamental human rights. by fostering its resilience. In order to do so, this Regulation should support the EU Green Deal’s objectives and the Green Deal Industrial Plan, including the transition to a full circular economy by 2050 based on short and diverse supply chains, less dependence on raw materials’ imports as well as high environmental, social and consumer protection standards while fully respecting and safeguarding fundamental human rights.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 – indent 1
— the necessary means to ensure the continued functioning of the Single Market, the businesses that operate on the Single Market and its strategic supply chains, including the free circulation of goods, services and persons in times of crisis and the availability of crisis relevant goods and services to citizens, businesses and public authorities at the time of crisis; while making sure that freedom of movement can be preserved under safe conditions especially for workers involved in the production and provision of those goods and services;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 – indent 3
— the means for the timely accessibility and availability of the information which is needed for a targeted response and adequate market behaviour by businesses, workers and citizens during a crisis.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Where possible, this Regulation should allow for anticipation and prevention of events and crises, building on on-going analysis concerning strategically important areas of the Single Market economy and the Union’s continuous foresight work.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In order to account for the exceptional nature of and potential far- reaching consequences for the fundamental operation of the Single Market of a Single Market emergency, implementingvigilance and emergency, delegated powers should exceptionally be conferred ton the Councilmmission for the activation of Single Market vigilance and emergency mode pursuant to Article 281(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 219 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Article 21 TFEU lays down the right of EU citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. The detailed conditions and limitations are laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This Directive sets out the general principles applicable to these limitations and the grounds that may be used to justify such measures. These grounds are public policy, public security or public health. InMember States shall refrain from introducing restrictions on the free movement of Union citizens and their family members and of this rd-countext, restrictions to freedom of movement can be justified if they are proportionate and non-ry nationals legally staying or residing in the territories of the Member States as well as refugees and beneficiaries of international protection that restrict on grounds of public policy, public security and public health without individual risk assessment or that are directly discriminatory. This Regulation is not intended to provide for additional grounds for the limitation of the right to free movement of persons beyond those provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 224 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Article 45 TFEU lays down the right to free movement of workers, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. This Regulation contains provisions which complement the existing measures in order to preinforcserve free movement of persons, increase transparency and provide administrative assistance during Single Market emergencies while ensuring the safety of persons exercising their freedom of movement also in times of crisis. Such measures include setting up and making available of the single points of contact to workers and their representatives in the Member States and at Union level during the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes under this regulation.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 227 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) If Member States should refrain from adopting measures affecting the free movement of goods or persons, goods or the freedom to provide services in preparation for and during Single Market emergencies, they should limit such measures to what isunless justified on grounds of legitimate public policy, security and health, in a proportionate and non-discriminatory manner. Especially in Single Market emergencies, citizens, workers, consumers and businesses depend on a well functioning Single Market and on the preservation of safe freedom of movement. Therefore, any such measures restricting the free movement of goods and services have to be limited to what is absolutely necessary and have to be remove themd as soon as the situation allows it. Such measures should respect the principles of proportionality and non- discrimination and should take into consideration the particular situation of border regionsgive special regard to the particular situation of border regions, to the provision of services that are essential to the functioning of the affected sector and to sectors that are notably dependent on mobile workers especially in services of general interest. Workers who due to the nature of their tasks and responsibilities are objectively unable to work remotely should not be subject to undue restrictions as long as their safety can be guaranteed.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The activation of the Single Market emergency mode should trigger an obligation for the Member States to notify crisis-relevant free movement restrictionsMember States shall notify any free movement restrictions without delay, and give a justified assessment of their proportionality and necessity.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) When examining the compatibility of any notified draft or adopted measures with the principle of necessity and proportionality, the Commission should pay due regard to the evolving crisis situation and often limited information that is at the disposal of the Member States when they seek to reduce the emerging risks in the context of the crisis. Where justified and necessary in the circumstances, the Commission may consider based on any available information, including specialised or scientific information,consult with stakeholders such as social partners in order to assess the impact on the labour market. The Commission should assess the merits of Member State arguments including those relying on the precautionary principle enshrined in Article 191 TFEU as a reason for adoption of free movement of persons restrictions. It is the task of the Commission to ensure that such measures comply with Union law and do not create unjustified obstacles to the functioning of the Single Market and to the right to free movement. The Commission should react to the notifications of Member States as quickly as possible, taking into account the circumstances of the particular crisis, and at the latest within the time-limits set out by this Regulation.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 236 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure that the specific Single Market vigilance and emergency measures provided for in this Regulation are used only where this is indispensable for preparing for or responding to a particular Single Market emergency, such measures should require individual activation by means of Commission implementingand deactivation by means of delegated acts, which indicate the reasons for such activation and the crisis-relevant goods or services that such measures apply to. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable delegated acts as referred to in Articles 9, 10, and 14, 15 and 23 in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3). In order to ensure transparency and democratic scrutiny, the European Parliament has the right to demand the Commission to annually report on the ongoing monitoring of the Single Market’s crisis preparedness, including its mapping of supply chains and the undertaken stress tests, including climate stress tests, on measures taken to increase its resilience as well as on measures taken under vigilance and emergency modes in particular vigilance and emergency situations.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Furthermore, in order to ensure the proportionality of the implementingdelegated acts and due respect for the role of economic operators in crisis management, the Commission should only resort to the activation of the Single Market emergency mode, where economic operators are not able to provide a solution on a voluntary basis within a reasonable time, this exchange should be thoroughly and clearly documented. Why this is the case should be indicated in each such act, and in relation to all particular aspects of a crisis.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The activation of the Single Market emergency mode, where needed, should also trigger the application of certain crisis- response procedures which introduce adjustments to the rules governing the design, manufacture, conformity assessment and the placing on the market of goods subject to Union harmonised rules in full respect of the precautionary principle of Article 191 TFEU to ensure a high level of protection when it comes to human, animal, plant and environmental health. These crisis-response procedures should enable products, designated as crisis-relevant goods to be placed swiftly on the market in an emergency context. TWhen in Union harmonisation legislation, the conformity assessment is carried out by a third party, the conformity assessment bodies should prioritise the conformity assessment of crisis-relevant goods over any other ongoing applications for other products. On the other hand, in cases, where there are undue delays in the conformity assessment procedures, the national competent authorities should be able to issue authorisations for products, which have not undergone the applicable conformity assessment procedures to be placed on their respective market, provided that they comply with the applicable safety requirements. Such author, social and environmental legislations shall be only valid on the territory of the issuing Member State and laid down in relevant Union harmonisation legislation, including harmonised standards. A rolling review can ensure that the latest scientific evidence is taken into account. Such authorisations shall be only limited to the duration of the Single Market emergency and for a maximum of six months. In addition, in order to facilitate the increase in supply of crisis-relevant products, certain flexibilities should be introduced with respect to the mechanism of presumption of conformity. In order to ensure transparency about the products being placed on the market in one member state in a state of emergency under the presumption of conformity, a traceability tool shall give economic operators, market surveillance authorities and consumers the transparency and information needed about a product and its conformity. To enable regular monitoring of crisis relevant goods and goods that risk on becoming crisis- relevant, a traceabiliy tool therefore shall cover these products. In the context of a Single Market emergency, the manufacturers of crisis-relevant goods should be able to rely also on national and international standards, whichif they provide an equivalent level of protection to the harmonised European standards. In cases where the later do not exist or the compliance with them is rendered excessively difficult by the disruptions to the Single Market, the Commission should be able to issue common technical specifications of voluntary or of mandatory application in order to provide ready-to-use technical solutions to the manufacturers.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In order to leverage the purchasing power and negotiating position of the Commission during the Single Market vigilance mode and the Single Market emergency mode, Member States should be able to request the Commission to procure on their behalf. Mandates and contracts of such joint procurement undertakings should be made available to the public.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 250 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Where there is a severe shortage of crisis-relevant products or services on the Single market during a Single Market emergency, and it is clear that the economic operators that operate on the Single market do not produce any such goods, but would in principle be able to repurpose their production lines or would have insufficient capacity to provide the goods or services needed, the Commission should be able to recommend to the Member States as a last resort to take measures to facilitate or request the ramping up or repurposing of production capacity of manufacturers or the capacity of the service providers to provide crisis- relevant services. In doing so the Commission would inform the Member States, the advisory group and the European Parliament as to the severity of the shortage and the type of the crisis- relevant goods or services that are needed and would provide support and advice in relation to the flexibilities in the EU acquis for such purposes.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 251 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The measures ensuring regulatory flexibility would allow the Commission to recommend that Member States accelerate the procedures for granting permits that would be necessary for enhancement of the capacity to produce crisis-relevant goods or provide crisis-relevant services without prejudice to the precautionary principle and fully respecting environmental, social and consumer protection standards.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 254 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Additionally, to ensure that crisis- relevant goods are available during the Single Market emergency, the Commission may invite the economic operators that operate in crisis-relevant supply chains to prioritise the orders of inputs necessary for the production of final goods that are crisis relevant, or the orders of such final goods themselves. Should an economic operator refuse to accept and prioritise such orders, following objective evidence that the availability of crisis-relevant goods is indispensable, the Commission may decide to invitshould oblige the economic operators concerned to accept and prioritise certain orders, the fulfilment of which will then take precedence over any other private or public law obligations. In the event of failure to accept, the operator in question should explain its legitimate reasons for declining the request. The Commission mayshould make such reasoned explanation or parts of it public, with due regard to business confidentiality.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Furthermore, to ensure availability of crisis-relevant goods during the Single Market emergency, the Commission may recommend that Member States distribute strategic reserves, having with due regard to the principles of solidarity, necessity and proportionality. This must take into account the different local and regional needs such as those of the outermost regions, densely populated cities, rural areas and border regions.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 256 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Furthermore, to ensure availability of crisis-relevant goods during the Single Market emergency, the Commission may recommend that Member States distribute strategic reserves, having with due regard to the principles of solidarity, necessity and proportionality. Intra-EU export bans shall be prohibited.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt supportive measures for facilitating free movement of persons and their protection, for establishing a list of individual targets (quantities and deadlines) for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain, so that the objectives of the initiative are achieved. Furthermore, implementingdelegated powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activating the vigilance mode and vigilance measures in order to carefully monitor the strategic supply chains and coordinate the building up of strategic reserves for goods and services of strategic importance. Moreover, implementingdelegated powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of a Single Market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 264 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and the right to liberty and security of person (Article 6). In particular, it respects the right to privacy of the economic operators enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, right to data protection set out in Article 8 of the Charter, the freedom to conduct business and the freedom of contract, which are protected by Article 16 of the Charter, the right to property, protected by Article 17 of the Charter, right to collective bargaining and action protected by Article 26 of the Charter as well as the right to strike and the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter. Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. The Regulation should not affect the autonomy of the social partners as recognised by the TFEU.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The Union framework shall include interregional elements to establish coherent, multi-sectoral, cross-border Single Market vigilance and emergency response measures, in particular considering the resources, capacities and vulnerabilities across neighbouring regions, specifically border regions and cross-border workers and service providers in their local labour markets.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a 1. framework of measures to anticipate, prevent, prepare for and respond to impacts of crises on the Single Market, with the purpose of safeguarding the free movement of goods, services and persons, the functioning of the labour market, mobile and cross-border workers’ safety when exercising free movement, a high level of environmental, social and consumer protection and of ensuring the availability of goods and services of strategic importance and crisis- relevant goods and services in the Single Market.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 283 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) an advisory group to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preparing, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis on the Single Market;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 286 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) contingency measures aiming at anticipation and planning, preparing, preventing and planning in order to strengthen the Single Market’s resilience;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 291 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) measures for addressing Single and labour Market impacts of significant incidents that have not yet resulted in a Single Market emergency (Single Market vigilance), including a set of vigilance measures and
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall regularly exchange information on all matters falling within the scope of this Regulation among themselves, with the advisory group, the European Parliament and with the Commission.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. This Regulation shall not affect the fundamental rights as recognised at EU level and in Member States , including the freedom or right to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 343 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘goods and, services and technology of strategic importance’ means goods and, services and technology that are indispensable for ensuring the functioning of the Single Market in strategically important areas and which cannot be substituted or diversified in a timely manner;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 348 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘crisis-relevant goods and, services and technology’ means goods and, services and technology that are indispensable for responding to the crisis or for addressing the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market during a Single Market emergency ;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 374 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory group and ensure its secretariat. The Commission may inviteshall ensure the presence of a representative of the European Parliament, representatives of EFTA States that are contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area49 , representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations, social partners and experts, to attend meetings of the advisory group as observers. It shall invite the representatives of other crisis- relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the advisory group. __________________ 49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 377 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purpose of contingency planning and strengthening the Single Market’s resilience under Articles 6 to 8, the advisory group shall assist and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 382 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) assessingment of significant incidents that the Member States have alerted the Commission to with regards to their impact on the free movement of goods, persons and services and on the labour market.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 387 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) assessing measures taken by the European Commission to strengthen the Single Market’s resilience such as mapping of relevant supply chains with relevant economic operators and technology as well as stress tests, including climate stress tests, conducted by the European Commission.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 397 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) consulting the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, as well as social partners and industry to collect market intelligence;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall ensure the participation of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis. The advisory group shall cooperate and coordinate closely, where appropriate, with other relevant crisis-related bodies at Union level. The Commission shall ensure coordination with the measures implemented through other Union mechanisms, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) or the EU Health Security Framework. The advisory group shall ensure information exchange with the Emergency Response Coordination Centre under the UCPM. The Commission shall annually report to the European Parliament on the work of the advisory board.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate, together with local and regional authorities, central liaison offices responsible for contacts, coordination and information exchange with the central liaison offices of other Member States and Union level central liaison office under this Regulation. Such liaison offices shall coordinate and compile the inputs from relevant national, regional and local competent authorities.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 439 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion of the advisory group and the input of relevant Union level bodies, is empowered after consulting the Member States, to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation with a framework setting out crisis protocols regarding crisis cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes, in particular:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 441 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) cooperation between national and Union level competent authorities for the exchange of Single Market resilience measures, the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes in vigilance and emergency modes across the sectors of the Single Market;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 442 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) cooperation between national and Union level competent authorities at local, regional, national and Union level for the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes in vigilance and emergency modes across the sectors of the Single Market;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 443 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a coordinated approach to risk and crisis communication also vis-à-vis the public and stakeholders with a coordinating role for the Commission;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 449 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) consultation of the representatives of economic operators and social partnesocial partners and economic operators , including SMEs, on their initiatives and actions to mitigate andactions to respond to potentialssible supply chain disruptions and overcomresolve potential shortages of goods and services in the Single Market; including their impact on the labour markets and measures put in place to protect the safety and rights of workers and service providers in the identified strategic areas;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 462 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall organise the training on crisis preparation, coordination, cooperation, communication and information exchange referred to in Article 6 for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices from all Member States based on potential scenarios of Single Market emergencies.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 473 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the number of economic operators affected by the disruption or potential disruption, including possible disruptions of the labour market;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 493 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, it shall activate the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act. Such an implementing act shall contain the following: delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 497 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an assessment of the potential impact of the crisis, laying out why this crisis is of critical importance to the Union and its Member States, pointing out why this crisis is of systemic and vital importance for public security, public safety, public order or public health, and how this crisis would have a significant impact on the functioning of the Single Market;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 498 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an assessment of the potential impact of the crisis, including the specific situation of border regions;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 508 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The implementingdelegated act referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 412(2).
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 517 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, if it considers that the reasons for activating the vigilance mode pursuant to Article 9(1) remain valid, and taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, may extend the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementingdelegated act.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 522 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, finds that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is no longer present, with respect to some or all vigilance measures or for some or all of the goods and services, it shall deactivate the vigilance mode in full or in part by means of an implementingdelegated act.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 523 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(2).deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 531 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. When the vigilance mode has been activated in accordance with Article 9, national competent authorities shall monitor the supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance that have been identified in the implementingdelegated act activating the vigilance mode.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 540 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall set up and maintain an inventory of the most relevant economic operators established on their respective national territory that operate along the supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance that have been identified in the implementingdelegated act activating the vigilance mode.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 542 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the inventory set up pursuant to Article 6, national competent authorities shall address requests for voluntary provision of information to the most relevant operators along the supply chains of goods and services identified in the implementingdelegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9 and other relevant stakeholders established in their respective national territory. Such requests shall in particular states which information about factors impacting the availability of the identified goods and services of strategic importance isand about the impact on the labour market are requested. Each economic operator/stakeholder that voluntarily provides information shall do so on an individual basis in line with the Union rules on competition governing the exchange of information. The national competent authorities shall transmit the relevant findings to the Commission and the advisory group without undue delay via the respective central liaison office.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 551 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission may askshall consult with the advisory group to discuss theon findings and prospects of evolution based on the monitoring of supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 554 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. On the basis of the information collected through the activities carried out in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission mayshall provide a report of the aggregated findings.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 560 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may, among the goods of strategic importance listed in an implementingdelegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1),, identify those for which it may be necessary to build a reserve in order to prepare for a Single Market emergency, taking into account the probability and impact of shortages on vital societal and vital economic activities. The Commission shall inform the Member States, the European Parliament and advisory board thereof.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 565 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission mayshall require, by means of implementing acts, that the Member States provide information on the goods listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1), as regards all of the following:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 572 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Taking due account of stocks held or being built up by economic operators on their territory, Member States shall deploy their best efforts to build up strategic reserves of the goods of strategic importance identified in accordance with paragraph 1. The Commission shall provide support to Member States to coordinate and streamline their efforts.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 574 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Where the building of strategic reserves of goods of strategic importance identified pursuant to paragraph 1 can be rendered more effective by streamlining among Member States, the Commission mayshall draw up and regularly update, by means of implementing acts, a list of individual targets regarding the quantities and the deadlines for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain. When setting the individual targets for each Member State, the Commission shall take into account:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 577 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Following such an assessment, where the Commission establishes, supported by objective data, which is factual, measurable, substantiated and not informed by bias that
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 583 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. When assessing the severity of a disruption for the purposes of ascertaining whether the impact of a crisis on the Single Market qualifies as a Single Market emergency, the Commission shall, based on concrete and reliable evidence, takinge into account at least the following indicators:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 586 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) when the freedom of movement of persons, goods and/or on services was already or is likely to be severely impacted because of the crisis;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 591 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an estimation of the number of economic operations or us, users or consumers relying on the disrupted sector or sectors of the Single Market for the provision of the goods or services concerned;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 596 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the impacts in terms of degree and duration on economic and societal activities, the environmentclimate, the environment, consumers, workers and public safety;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 608 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the importance of economic operators in the affected seconomic operator in maintaining a sufficient level of supply of the goods or services, taking into account the availability of alternative means for the provision of those goods or services; and
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 618 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers there is a Single Market emergency, it shall propose to the Council to activate the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 624 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Council may activate the Single Market emergency mode by means of a Council implementing act. The duration of the activation, shall be specified in the implementingdelegated act, and shall be a maximum of six months.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 633 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. As soon as the Single Market emergency mode is activated, the Commission shall, in consultation with the advisory group including relevant stakeholders, without delay, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services and sectors that are notably depending on mobile workers by means of an implementing act. The list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 647 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission considers, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, that an extension of the Single Market emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to extend the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall endeavour to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the Single Market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of an implementing act and for a maximum duration of six months.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 651 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Where the advisory group has concrete and reliable evidence that the Single Market emergency should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers a Single Market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council without delay propose the deactivation of the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 660 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. When adopting and applying national measures in response to a Single Market emergency and the underlying crisis, Member States shall ensure that their actions fully comply with the Treaty and Union law and, in particular, with the priority requirements laid down in this Article, especially as regards measures under the Schengen Borders Code.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 667 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Any restriction shall be limited in time and removed as soon as the situation allows it. Additionally, any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions and their cross-border and mobile workers.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 670 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Any requirement imposed on citizens, workers and businesses shall not create an undue or unnecessary administrative burden.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 675 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall inform citizens, consumers, businesses, workers and their representatives about measures that affect their free movement rights in a clear and unambiguous manner so as to facilitate cross-border coordination in close cooperation with social partners at national and local level.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 686 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) intraUnion export bans or other measures having equivalent effect on crisis-relevant goods or services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 5;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 689 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) restrictions on the intra-EU export of goods or provision or receipt of services, or measures having equivalent effect, where those restrictions do any of the following (i) relevant goods and services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 5, or (ii) such goods and services in the single market;deleted disrupt supply chains of crisis- create or increase shortages of
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 695 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) restrictions on the free movement of persons involved in the production of crisis-relevant goods that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 5 and their parts or in provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14 paragraph 5 or which are essential to the functioning of the relevant sectors, or other measures having equivalent effect, that:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 699 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Restrictions on the free movement of Union citizens and their family members and of third-country nationals legally staying or residing in the territories of Member States, as well as of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection, or other measures having equivalent effect, that: (i) restrict the freedom of movement on grounds of public policy, public security or public health without individual risk assessment or (ii) are directly discriminatory based on the nationality of the person.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 713 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) imposing prohibitions on travel, including travel for imperative family reasons, which are not appropriate for the achievement of any legitimate public interest purportedly pursued by such measures or which manifestly go beyond what is necessary to achieve that aim including established partnerships;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 716 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) imposing restrictions on workers and service providers and their representatives, unless to do so in inherent to the nature of the crisis/Single Market emergency and it does not manifestly go beyond what is necessary for that purpose. with due regard to mobile and cross border workers, in particular those which require on-location work;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 721 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) Those service providers that provide crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5), or business representatives or workers that are involved in production of crisis-relevant goods or provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) including those that are essential to the functioning of the affected sector to allow them to have access to the place of their activities, if activities in the sector concerned are still allowed in the Member State;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 723 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 7
7. When taking the measures referred to in this provision, the Member States shall ensure full compliance with the Treaties and Union law, including the protection of workers, service providers and business representatives, ensuring they are able to exercise their freedom of movement under safe conditions. Nothing in this provision shall be construed as authorising or justifying restrictions to free movement contrary to the Treaties or other provisions of Union law.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 728 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. During the Single Market emergency mode, the Commission may provide for supportive measures to reinforcfacilitate free movement of persons referred to in Article 17(6) and 17(7) and to ensure that they can exercise their freedom of movement under safe conditions by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 422(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 739 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide to the Commission a statement of the reasons which make the enactment of such measure justified and proportionate, where those reasons have not already been made clear in the notified measureaccompanied by an assessment of the necessity and proportionality of such measures. Member States shall assess in particular whether the proposed measures are likely to adequately remedy or address the Single Market emergency and whether other less restrictive measures could attain the same objective, having regard to the impact of the adopted measures on freedom of movement and other fundamental rights, their scope and duration. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the full text of the national legislative or regulatory provisions which contain or are modified by the measure.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 745 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. If the advisory group chooses to deliver an opinion on a notified measure, it shall do so within fourtwo working days from the date of receipt by the Commission of the notification concerning that measure.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 747 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall ensure that citizens and businesses are informed of the notified measures, unless Member States request that the measures remain confidential, or the Commission deems disclosure of those measures would affect the security and public order of the European Union or its Member States, as well as of the decisions and Member States’ comments adopted in accordance with this Article.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 750 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 8
8. Within 105 days from the date of receipt of the notification, the Commission shall examine the compatibility of any draft or adopted measure with Union law, including Articles 16 and 17 of this Regulation as well as the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination, and may provide comments on the notified measure when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that it does not comply with Union law. Such comments shall be taken into account by the notifying Member State. In exceptional circumstances, in particular to receive scientific advice, evidence or technical expertise in the context of an evolving situation, the period of 105 days may be extended by the Commission. The Commission shall set out the reasons justifying any such extension, shall set a new deadline and shall inform the Member States about the new deadline and the reasons for the extension without delay.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 753 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 10
10. The notifying Member State shall communicate the measures it intends to adopt in order to comply with the comments delivered in accordance with paragraph 8 to the Commission within 105 days after receiving them.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 756 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 11
11. If the Commission finds that the measures communicated by the notifying Member State are still not in accordance with Union law, it may issue within 3015 days of that communication, a decision requiring that Member State to refrain from adopting the notified draft measure. The notifying Member State shall communicate the adopted text of a notified draft measure to the Commission without delay.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 760 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 13
13. The period of 3015 days referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 may be exceptionally extended by the Commission in order to take account of a change of circumstances, in particular to receive scientific advice, evidence or technical expertise in the context of an evolving situation. The Commission shall set out the reasons justifying any such extension and shall set a new deadline and shall inform the Member States about the new deadline and the reasons for the extension without delay.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 762 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 14
14. The Commission decisions referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 shall be based on available information and may be issued when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that the notified measures do not comply with Union law, including Article 16 or 17 of this Regulation, the principle of proportionality or the principle of non-discrimination. The adoption of those decisions shall be without prejudice to the possibility for the Commission to adopt measures at a latIn case a Member State fails to notify the Commission or in case the Commission decides a measure taken by a Member sStage, including the launching ofte is non-compliant with EU law, the Commission shall launch an infringement procedure on the basis of Article 258 TFEU.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 769 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) assistance in dissemination of information to businesses, consumers and workers by closely cooperating with stakeholders at national and local level such as social partners and consumer organisations.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 777 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Union level single point of contact shall provide citizens, consumers, local and regional authorities, economic operators, workers and their representatives with the following assistance:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 778 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information as regards Union level and other Member States’ crisis response measures that are relevant to the activated Single Market emergency or which affect the exercise of the free movement of goods, services, persons and workers;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 787 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Binding measures included in this Chapter may be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in accordance with Articles 24(2), first subparagraph of Article 26 and Article 27(2) may be adopted only after a Single Market Emergency has been activated by means of a Council implementingdelegated act in accordance with Article 14.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 793 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Where there is a severe crisis- related shortages or an immediate threat thereof, the Commission mayshall invite representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains to transmit on a voluntary basis, within a set time limit, specific information to the Commission on the production capacities and possible existing stocks of crisis- relevant goods and components thereof in Union production facilities and third country facilities which it operates, contracts or purchases supply from, as well as information on any relevant supply chain disruptions within a given deadline.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 798 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. If the addressees do not transmit the information requested in accordance with paragraph 1 within the time-limit andor do not provide a valid justification for not doing so within 14 days, the Commission mayshall, by means of an implementing act, require that they transmit the information, indicating in the implementing act why it is proportionate and necessary to do so, specifying the crisis-relevant goods and services and addressees concerned by the information request, and the information that is sought, providing where necessary a template with the questions that may be addressed to the economic operators.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 808 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. Following the activation of the mandatory information requests to economic operators by means of an implementing act, the Commission shall address a formal decision to each of those representative organisations or economic operators in crisis- relevant supply chains that have been identified in the implementing act, requesting them to provide the information specified in the implementing act. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States and on the mapping of economic operators as referred to in Art. 6 (3new). The Commission may obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 813 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission Decisions containing individual information requests shall contain a reference to the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 on which they are based and to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency or for compiling relevant official statistics. A request shall set out a reasonable time limit within which the information is to be provided but which is no longer than 10 days. It shall take into account the effort required to collect and make the data available by the economic operator or representative organisation. The formal decision shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 39 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information contained in the reply in accordance with Article 25, and information on the possibility of contesting it before the Court of Justice of the European Union in line with relevant Union law and the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply and the timeline for a reply.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 831 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
When the Single Market emergency mode has been activated by means of a Council implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, and there is a shortage of crisis relevant goods the Commission may activate by means of implementing acts the emergency procedures included in the Union legal frameworks amended by [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and introducing emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context of a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and 2014/68/EU and introducingas regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context ofdue to a Single Market] as regards crisis-relevant goods, indicating which crisis-relevant goods and emergency procedures are subject to the activation, providing reasons for such activation and its proportionality, and indicating the duration of such activation while complying with the applicable safety requirements, social and environmental legislation laid down in relevant Union harmonisation legislation. The duration can be for maximum six months. A rolling review should ensure that the latest scientific evidence is taken into account even under emergency procedures.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 836 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Traceability 1. For products admitted under Article 26 in this Regulation, and after consulting the Consumer Safety Network, relevant expert groups and relevant stakeholders, the Commission shall set up a system of traceability to which economic operators who place and make available those products on the market shall adhere. 2. The system of traceability shall consist of the collection and storage of data, including by electronic means, enabling the identification of the product, its components or of the economic operators involved in its supply chain, as well as in modalities to display and to access those data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents. 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to supplement this Regulation by: (a) determining the crisis relevant products, as referred to in paragraph 1; (b) specifying the type of data which economic operators are to collect and store by means of the system of traceability referred to in paragraph 2; (c) specifying the modalities to display and to access data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents as referred to in paragraph 2; (d) specifying the actors that shall have access to the data as referred to in point (b) and to what data they shall have access, including consumers, economic operators, providers of online marketplaces, competent national authorities, the Commission, and public interest organisations, or any organisation acting on their behalf. 4. Market surveillance authorities, consumers, economic operators and other relevant actors shall have access to the data referred to in paragraph 3 based on their respective access rights set out in the applicable delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 3, point (d). 5. When adopting the measures referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission shall take into account: (a) an adequate timeframe to allow economic operators to prepare for those measures; and (b) the compatibility and interoperability with other product traceability systems already set up at Union or at international level.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 841 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, informing the European Parliament, may invite one or more economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains established in the Union to accept and prioritise certain orders for the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority rated order’).
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 846 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. If an economic operator does not accept andor prioritise priority rated orders, the Commission may, at its own initiative or at the request of 14 Member States, assess the necessity and proportionality of resorting to priority rated orders in such cases, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned as well as any parties demonstrably affected by the potential priority rated order, the opportunity to state their position within a reasonable time limit set by the Commission in light of the circumstances of the case. In exceptional circumstances, following such an assessment, the Commission may address an implementing act to the economic operator concerned, requiring it to either accept and prioritise the priority rated orders specified in the implementing act or explain in written why it is not possible or appropriate for that operator to do so. The Commission’s decision shall be based on objective data which is factual, measurable, substantiated and not informed by bias showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal or vital economic activities in the Single Market
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 851 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept andperform the prioritise they rated orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 10 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate, in light of the objectives of this provision, for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, or other considerations of comparable gravity.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 855 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall take the decision referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law. The decision shall in particular take into account the legitimate interests of the economic operator concerned and any available information concerning the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. It shall state the legal basis for its adoption, fix the time limits within which the priority rated order is to be performed and, where applicable, specify the product and quantity. It shall state the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply with the decision. The priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 863 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission mayshall, by means of a decision, where deemed necessary and proportionate, impose fines:
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 865 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where a representative organisation of economic operators or an economic operator, intentionally or through gross negligence, supplies incorrect, incomplete or misleading information in response to a request made pursuant to Article 24, or does not supply the information within the prescribed time limit;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 866 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) shall not exceed 200 000 EUR.deleted
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 871 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (c) shall not exceedbe lower than 1 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year for each working day of non-compliance with the obligation pursuant to Article 27 (priority rated orders) calculated from the date established in the decision not exceeding 1% of total turnover in the preceding business year.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 893 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Where the strategic reserves constituted by the Member States in accordance with Article 12 prove to be insufficient to meet the needs related to the Single Market emergency, the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, may recommend to the Member States to distribute the strategic reserves in a targeted way, where possible, having regard to the need not to further aggravate disruptions on the Single Market, including in geographical areas particularly affected by such disruptions and in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and solidarity and establishing the most efficient use of reserves with a view to ending the Single Market emergency.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 904 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) aiming at accelerating permitting of crisis-relevant goods. fully respecting social and environmental legislation;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 906 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) aiming at using all flexibilities of the international framework on intellectual property protection..
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 909 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. TWhen respectively the vigilance mode or Single Market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 9 or 14, two or more Member States may request that the Commission launch a procurement on behalf of the Member States that wish to be represented by the Commission (ʽparticipating Member Statesʼ), for the purchasing of goods and services of strategic importance listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) or crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5).
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 914 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the utility, necessity and proportionality of the request. Where the Commission intends not to follow the request, it shall inform the Member States concerned and the advisory group referred to in Article 4 and give reasons for its refusal.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 915 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission agrees to procure on behalf of the Member States, it shall draw up a proposal for a framework agreement to be concluded with the participating Member States allowing the Commission to procure on their behalf. This agreement shall lay down the detailed conditions, practical arrangements for this procedure as well as rules for decision- making, for the procurement on behalf of the participating Member States referred to in paragraph 1 and shall be made public.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 918 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. The agreement [referred to in Article 34(3) shall establish a negotiating mandate, including on elements such as definition of technical specifications, award criteria and assessment of tenders received, for the Commission to act as a central purchasing body for relevant goods and services of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods and services on behalf of the participating Member States through the conclusion of new contracts. which shall be made public
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 926 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. Representatives of the Commission or experts nominated by the Commission may carry out on-regular on-site visits, including not anounced site visits at the locations of production facilities of relevant goods of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 929 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The contracts mayshall include a clause stating that a Member State which has not participated in the procurement procedure may become a party to the contract after it has been signed, laying out in detail the procedure for doing so and its effects.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 930 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a Publication of joint public procurement contracts 1. The Commission must ensure all joint procurement contracts are made available to the public and accessible on the Commission's website within 30 days after signing of the contract. Information disclosed for public scrutiny shall include: (a) the amount of public investment paid to the contractor, broke down by cost structure of the product; (b) price per unit of the product; (c) number of product units to be delivered per quarter; (d) number and locations of the product’s manufacturing sites; (e) arrangements related to product donations, intellectual property and technology transfer within the Union and with third countries; (f) product liability clauses and compensation for any damage caused by the product; (g) terms and conditions related to the breach of the contracts and their termination. The European Court of Auditors shall have full access to all relevant documents to provide accurate annual scrutiny of signed contracts and public investment;
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 942 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the obligations of Member States relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications, or the obligations of the Commission and, where appropriate, other Union institutions and bodies, relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725, when fulfilling their responsibilities.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 946 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. Where processing of personal data is not strictly necessary to the fulfilment of the mechanisms established in this Regulation can be achieved with processing anonymised data, personal data shall be rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not identifiable.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 949 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
The Commission and the Member States may set up interoperable digital open source tools or IT infrastructures supporting the objectives of this Regulation. Such tools or infrastructures may be developed outside the duration of the Single Market Emergency.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 952 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of fivetwo years from date of entry into force of this Directive or any other date set by the co- legislators.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 953 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 a (new)
Article 43 a Urgency procedure 1. Delegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed. 2. The notification of a delegated act to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure. 3. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act. In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act immediately following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or by the Council.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 958 #

2022/0278(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP: please insert date = five years from the entry into force of this Regulation] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning of the contingency planning, vigilance and Single Market emergency response system suggesting any improvements if necessary, accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals and report on reslience measures.
2023/03/31
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2022/0269(COD)

(3) The eradication of forced labour is a priority for the Union. Respect for human dignity and the universality and indivisibility of human rights are firmly enshrined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. Article 5(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights provide that no one is to be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly interpreted Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights as requiring Member States to penalise and effectively prosecute any act maintaining a person in the situations described set out in Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.19The right of victims to an effective remedy for business-related human rights violations or abuses, including forced labour, is recognised in Union law, the UN Guiding Principles on the Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the Council of Europe and the OECD. _________________ 19 For instance paras. 89 and 102 in Siliadin v. France or para. 105 in Chowdury and Others v. Greece.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 114 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Through its policies and legislative initiatives the Union seeks to eradicate the use of forced labour and promote decent work and labour rights worldwide. The Union promotes due diligence in accordance with international guidelines and principles established by international organisations, including the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (hereinafter “OECD”) and the United Nations (hereinafter “UN”), to ensure that forced labour does not find a place in the value chains of undertakings established in the Union.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 118 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Forced labour has a distinct impact on vulnerable and marginalised groups, such as children, women, migrants, refugees or indigenous peoples, and therefore an intersectional and gender sensitive approach is essential to combat forced labour effectively. This Regulation should therefore aim to achieve the objectives of the ILO Convention 182, Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, the Beijing Declaration, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees; the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the ILO Convention 169, as well as other relevant international agreements and conventions.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 121 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 b (new)
(6b) The 2021 EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child foresees that the EU will insist on third countries to update regularly national lists of hazardous occupations children should never be tasked to do. The Durban Call to Action on the Elimination of Child Labour recalls the commitments of UN members to strengthen the prevention and elimination of child labour, including its worst forms, forced labour, modern slavery and trafficking in persons and to increase financing and international cooperation for the elimination of child labour and forced labour. ILO Convention No. 138 requires Member States to create a national policy designed to ensure the effective abolition of child labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 124 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) [In particular, Directive 20XX/XX/EU on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence sets out horizontal due diligence obligations to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse impacts on human rights, including forced labour, and the environment in the company’s own operations, its subsidiaries and in its value chains, in accordance with international human and labour rights standards and environmental conventions. Those obligations apply to large companies over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover, and to smaller companies in high-impact sectors over a certain threshold in terms of number of employees and net turnover.22] _________________ 22 Directive 20XX/XX/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, OJ XX, XX.XX.20XX, p. XX.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the prohibition, such prohibition should apply to products for which forced labour has been used at any stage of their production, manufacture, harvest and extraction, including working or, processing, storage, packaging, transportation or distribution related to the products. The prohibition should apply to all products, of any type, including their components, and should apply to products regardless of the sector, the origin, whether they are domestic or imported, or placed or made available on the Union market or exported.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 145 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (’SMEs’) can have limited resources and ability to ensure that the products they place or make available on the Union market are free from forced labour. The Commission should therefore issue guidelines on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which should take into account also the size and economic resources of economic operators. In addition, the Commission should issue guidelines on forced-labour risk indicators and on publicly available information in order to help SMEs, as well as other economic operators, to comply with the requirements of the prohibition.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 150 #

2022/0269(COD)

(18a) Remedy is a crucial part of the human rights due diligence process under the UNGPs and is critical to ensuring that a Forced Labour Instrument has a positive impact for workers and holds corporations to account. Remedy will encourage workers to come forward and report abuse. Accordingly, this Regulation must ensure the provision of effective remedy to affected rightholders.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 152 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The competent authorities of the Member States should monitor the market to identify violations of the prohibition. In appointing those competent authorities, Member States should ensure that those authorities have sufficient human and financial resources and that their staff has the necessary competences and knowledge, especially with regard to human rights, labour rights, gender equality, value chain management and due diligence processes. Competent authorities should closely coordinate with national labour inspections and judicial and law enforcement authorities, including those responsible for the fight against trafficking in human beings in such a way as to avoid jeopardising investigations by such authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 155 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to increase the effectiveness of the prohibition, competent authorities should grant reasonable time to economic operators to identify, mitigate, prevent and bring to an end the risk of forced labour.deleted
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) When identifying potential violations of the prohibition, the Commission and competent authorities should follow a risk-based approach and assess all information available to them. CThe Commission and competent authorities should initiate an investigation where, based on their assessment of all available information, they establish that there is a substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 164 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Before initiatDuring an investigation, competent authorities shouldmay request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent or, remediate and bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and value chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the value chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 175 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure cooperation among the Commission and competent authorities designated under this and other relevant legislation and in order to ensure consistency in their actions and decisions, competent authorities designated under this Regulation should request information from other relevant authorities, where necessary, on whether economic operators under assessment are subject to and carry out due diligence in relation to forced labour in accordance with applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 182 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) During the preliminary phase of investigation,investigation, the Commission and competent authorities should focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the value chain where there is a higher risk of forced labourvalue chain with respect to the products under investigation, also taking into account their size and economic resources, the quantity of products concerned and the scale of the suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 186 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Competent authorities, when requesting information during the investigation, should prioritiseidentify to the extent possible and consistent with the effective conduct of the investigation the responsibilities of the economic operators under investigation that are involved in the steps of the value chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operatorwith the highest leverage to prevent, mitigate, remediate and bring to an end the use of forced labour in their operations and value chains, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 202 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Competent authoritieEconomic operators should bear the burden of establishproving that forced labour has not been used at any stage of production, manufacture, harvest or extraction, storage, packaging, transportation or distribution of a product, including working or processing related to the product on the basis of all information and evidence gathered during the investigation, including its preliminary phase. To ensure their right to due process, economic operators should have the opportunity to provide information in their defence towhen requested by the competent authorities throughoutor after the investigation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 207 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Competent authorities that establish that economic operators violated the prohibition, should without delay prohibit the placing and making available of such products on the Union market and their export from the Union, and require the economic operators that have been investigated to withdraw the relevant products already made available from the Union market and have themdonate the products to charitable or public interest purposes. If such products cannot be donated, economic operators should recycle them and if recycling is not possible, the products should be destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 214 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In that decision, competent authorities should state the findings of the investigation, and the information underpinning the findings, and set a reasonable time within which the economic operators should comply with the decision, as well as information allowing for the identification of the product to which the decision applies. The Commission should be empowered to adopt the implementing acts necessary to specify the details about the information to be contained in such decisions. The decisions from competent authorities should be made publicly available.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 216 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In setting a reasonable time to comply with the order, competent authorities should take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned.deleted
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 223 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) If the economic operators fail to comply with the decision of the competent authorities by the end of the established timeframe, the competent authorities should ensure that the relevant products are prohibited from being placed or made available on the Union market, exported or withdrawn from the Union market and that any such products remaining with the relevant economic operators are donated to charitable or public interest purposes. If such products cannot be donated, economic operators should recycle them, and if that is not possible, they should have the products destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management at the expense of the economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 231 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Any person, whether it is a natural or legal person, or any association not having legal personality, should be allowed to submit information to the Commission or to competent authorities when it considers that products made with forced labour are placed and made available on the Union market and to be informed of the outcome of the assessment of their submission. Submissions may be addressed to one or more competent authorities. The Commission and competent authorities shall ensure that the identity of the person or persons reporting complaints, providing evidence, and of any individuals who are potentially being subjected to forced labour in terms of the complaint or investigation, is not disclosed without the explicit consent of that or those persons, to anyone beyond the authorised staff members competent to receive or follow up on complaints. This shall also apply to any other information from which the identity of the reporting person may be directly or indirectly deduced.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 242 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour and complementary information for the Commission and competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 246 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Decisions of the Commission and competent authorities establishing a violation of the prohibition should be communicated to customs authorities, who should aim at identifying the product concerned amongst products declared for release for free circulation or export. The competent authorities should be responsible for the overall enforcement of the prohibition with regard to the internal market as well as products entering or leaving the Union market. Since forced labour is part of the manufacturing process and does not leave any trace on the product, and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 covers only manufactured products and its scope is limited to release for free circulation, the customs authorities would be unable to act autonomously under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 for the application and enforcement of the prohibition. The specific organisation of controls of each Member State should be without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council32and its general provisions on the control and supervisory powers of customs authorities. _________________ 32 Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (recast) (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 259 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Where the competent authorities conclude that a product corresponds to a decision establishing a violation of the prohibition, they should immediately inform customs authorities which should refuse its release for free circulation or export. The product should be destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed ofonated to charitable or public interest purposes. If the product cannot be donated, it should be recycled, and if that is not possible, it should be destroyed, in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management, which excludes re-export in case of non-Union goods.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 270 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) To ensure effective enforcement decisions taken by the Commission or a competent authority in one Member State should be recognised and enforced by competent authorities in the other Member States regarding products withfrom the same identification from the same supply chaiproduction site, company, group of companies or region for which forced labour has been found.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 275 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) To ensure effective enforcement of the prohibition, it is necessary to establish a network aimed at structured coordination and cooperation between the Commission, competent authorities of the Member States and, where appropriate, experts from customs authorities, and the Commission. That network should also aim at streamlining the practices of the competent authorities within the Union that facilitate the implementation of joint enforcement activities by Member States, including joint investigations. That administrative support structure and capacity building activities, such as the organisation of training programmes for competent authorities and other relevant stakeholders. The administrative support structure to be provided by the Commission should allow the pooling of resources and maintain a communication and information system between Member States and the Commission, thereby helping to strengthen the enforcement of the prohibition.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 280 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) The Commission should ensure the effective and uniform application of this Regulation and to that effect support and encourage cooperation between enforcement authorities through the Network. Furthermore, the Commission should set up a harmonised approach for penalties, and, in particular, it should lay down harmonised rules on penalties applicable to non-compliance with the decision of competent authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 283 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Since forced labour is a global problem and given the interlinkages of the global value chains, it is necessary to promote international cooperation against forced labour, which would also improve the efficiency of applying and enforcing the prohibition. The Commission should as appropriately cooperate with and exchange information with authorities of third countries and international organisations to enhance the effective implementation of the prohibition. International cooperation with authorities of non-EU countries should take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures, for example Human Rights Dialogues with third countries, or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis. Existing dialogue structures with third countries include the (sub)committees on trade and sustainable development in trade agreements or the dialogue foreseen within the Generalised System of Preferences. EU Delegations should have an important role when it comes to disseminating information on this Regulation and should facilitate the possibility of third parties in third countries to provide information on the existence of forced labour on a determined product.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 289 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48 a (new)
(48a) No later than three years after the entry into force, the Commission should carry out a first review of this Regulation with particular attention to the effectiveness of the instrument, proposing additional measures where deemed appropriate.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 293 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules prohibiting economic operators from placing and making available on the Union market or exporting from the Union market products made, stored, transported, packaged or distributed with forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 297 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Regulation lays down rules for remedial obligations for economic operators for cases where forced labour has been established.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 305 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) ‘forced labour high risk area’ means countries or regions where there is clear and reliable evidence of state- imposed forced labour, in an entire product group in a specific industry.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 307 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ‘due diligence in relation to forced labour’ means the efforts by economic operator to implement mandatory requirements, voluntary guidelines, recommendations or practices to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end the use of forced labour in their operations and value chain with respect to products that are to be made available on the Union market or to be exported;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 309 #

2022/0269(COD)

(ca) ‘remediation’ means measures aiming to improve conditions for workers and affected victims of forced labour.These include evidence of one or more of the following: i) financial and non-financial compensation, including compensation based on the duration and extent of forced labour and any harms suffered; ii) restitution for the victims, including restoring relevant documents such as visas and work permits, and returning their passport; iii) rehabilitation; iv) preventive measures and guarantees of non-reoccurrence of forced labour;and where it is accompanied by one or more of the above measures, apologies; v) other remediation measures as agreed on by the economic operators and affected workers and stakeholders.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 312 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) 'root causes of forced labour' means the causes leading to economic exploitation, poverty, systemic discrimination, and lack of regular and decent labour migration pathways at the level of a country or region. At the level of an economic operator, it includes prices below the cost of production, the lack of living incomes and living wages as well as unfair purchasing practices.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 314 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new)
(cc) ‘stakeholders’ means: i) workers and other individuals, groups, communities, trade unions, worker representatives or entities whose rights or interests are or could be affected by forced labour as used by an economic operator, its subsidiaries or its business relationships; ii) other legal or natural persons defending human rights, including individuals, groups and organs of society that promote and protect universally recognised human rights and fundamental freedoms and labour conventions, including the rights of workers, trade unions, indigenous peoples or other vulnerable stakeholders;and (iii) organisations whose statutory purpose is the defence of human rights;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 321 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘product’ means any product that can be valued in money and is capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions, whether it is extracted, harvested, produced or, manufactured, stored, transported, packaged or distributed including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 326 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘product made with forced labour’ means a product for which forced labour has been used in whole or in part at any stage of its extraction, harvest, production or manufacture, storage, transport, packaging or distribution, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 339 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) ‘product supplier’ means any natural or legal person or association of persons in the supply chain who extracts, harvests, produces or, manufactures, stores, transports, packages or distributes a product in whole or in part, or intervenes in the working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain, whether as manufacturer or in any other circumstances;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 345 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) ‘end user’ means any natural or legal person residing or established in the Union, to whom a product has been made available either as a consumer outside of any trade, business, craft or profession or as a professional end user in the course of its industrial or professional activities;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 350 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘substantiated concern’ means a well-founded, yet not conclusive, reason, based on objective and verifiable information, for the competent authorities to suspect that products were likely made with forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 354 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p
(p) ‘products entering the Union market’ means products from third countries and Union Member States intended to be placed on the Union market or intended for private use or consumption within the customs territory of the Union and placed under the customs procedure ‘release for free circulation’;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 358 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new)
(ua) 'meaningful engagement with stakeholders' means an interactive, responsive, ongoing and gender-inclusive process of engagement with potentially affected suppliers, stakeholders and their representative organisations, especially vulnerable stakeholders, such as workers, trade unions, smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities before a potential decision on disengaging is made;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 364 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Economic operators shall not place or make available on the Union market products that are made, stored, transported, packaged or distributed with forced labour, nor shall they export such products.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 368 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission or competent authorities may establish a violation of Article 3 (1) in any of the following cases: (a) a particular production site, or a group of production sites; (b) a particular operator, or group of operators; (c) a particular transport vessel or fleet; or (d) a particular product group from a forced labour high-risk area.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 371 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities shall follow a risk-based approach in assessing the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3. That assessment shall be based on all relevant information available to them, including the following information: (a) submissions made by natural or legal persons or any association not having legal personality pursuant to Article 10; (b) the risk indicators and other information pursuant to Article 23, points (b) and (c); (c) the database referred to in Article 11; (d) information and decisions encoded in the information and communication system referred to in Article 22(1), including any past cases of compliance or non-compliance of an economic operator with Article 3; (e) information requested by the competent authority from other relevant authorities, where necessary, on whether the economic operators under assessment are subject to and carry out due diligence in relation to forced labour in accordance with applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 379 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In their assessment of the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3, competent authorities shall focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the value chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occur and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 386 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following: (a) applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour; (b) the guidelines issued by the Commission pursuant to Article 23, point (a); (c) due diligence guidelines or recommendations of the UN, ILO, OECD or other relevant international organisations; (d) any other due diligence in relation to forced labour.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 397 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall respond to the request of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 3 within 15 working days from the day they received such request. Economic operators may provide to competent authorities any other information they may deem useful for the purposes of this Article.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 408 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Within 30 working days from the date of receipt of the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities shall conclude the preliminary phase of their investigation as to whether there is a substantiated concern of violation of Article 3 on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 414 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of time.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 425 #

2022/0269(COD)

7. Competent authorities shall not initiate an investigation pursuant to Article 5, and shall inform the economic operators under assessment accordingly, where, on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities consider that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of Article 3, for instance due to, but not limited to, the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour referred to in paragraph 3 being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 433 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities that, pursuant to Article 4(5), determine that there is a substantiated concern of a violation ofThe Commission and competent authorities shall decide to initiate investigations on their own accord or in response to complaints or information submitted in accordance with Article 10, and shall follow a risk based approach in assessing the likelihood of a violation of Article 3 on the basis of relevant information, including: a) the risk indicators and other information pursuant to Article 23, shall decide to initiate an investigation on the products and economic operators concernedpoints (b) and (c); b) the database referred to in Article 11; c) information and decisions encoded in the information and communication system referred to in Article 22(1), including any past cases of compliance or non-compliance of an economic operator with Article 3; d) information requested by the competent authority from other relevant authorities, where necessary, on whether the economic operators under assessment are subject to and carry out due diligence in relation to forced labour in accordance with applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 439 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. CThe Commission or the competent authorities that initiate an investigation pursuant to paragraph 1 shall inform, when they have reason to believe that the economic operators subject to the investigation, has additional information which is material to the investigation, inform the economic operators within 3 working days from the date of the decision to initiate such investigation about the following:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 447 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the possibility for the economic operators to submit any other document or information to the Commission or the competent authority, and the date by which such information has to be submitted.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 450 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) in accordance with Article 6 on the presumption of forced labour, the requirement for the operator to demonstrate within a delimited time frame that Article 3 has not been violated.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 453 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where requested to do so by the Commission or competent authorities, economic operators under investigation shall submit to those competent authorities any information that is relevant and necessary for the investigation, including information identifying the products under investigation, the manufacturer or producer of those products and the product suppliers. In requesting such information, competent authorities shall to the extent possible:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 456 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) prioritise the economic operators under investigation involved in the steps of the value chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs andidentify the individual responsibilities, along the value chain, of different economic operators down to the level where forced labour is taking place and prioritise the economic operators under investigation involved in the steps of the value chain with the highest leverage to prevent, mitigate, remediate and bring to an end the use of forced labour in their operations and value chains.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 460 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 467 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall submit the information within 15 working days from the request referred to in paragraph 3 or make a justified request for an extension of up to 5 working days of that time limit.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 473 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. When deciding on the time limits referred to in this Article, competent authorities shall consider the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 478 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. CThe Commission and competent authorities may collect relevant information by consulting with stakeholders or by carrying out all necessary checks and inspections including investigations in third countries, provided that the economic operators concerned give their consent and that the government of the Member State or third country in which the inspections are to take place has been officially notified and raises no objection, within a limited timeframe.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 487 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities shall assess all information and evidence gathered pursuant to Articles 4 and 5 and, on that basis, establish whether there is reasonable but not conclusive evidence that Article 3 has been violated, within a reasonable period of time30 days from the date they initiated the investigation pursuant to Article 5(1).
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 496 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall be empowered, after consultation with competent authorities and other stakeholders, to declare a presumption of forced labour for products or groups of products, from forced labour high risk areas. This decision shall be encoded in the database referred to in Article 11.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 498 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Where competent authorities cannot establish that Article 3 has been violated, they shall take a decision to close the investigation and inform the economic operator thereof. The closing of the investigation for lack of proof shall not preclude the right of competent authorities to start a new investigation into the same product in case new relevant information arises.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 500 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Where competent authorities cannot establish that Article 3 has been violated, they shall take a decision to close the investigation and inform the economic operator thereof. This decision shall not preclude the right of competent authorities to start a new investigation on the same product where new information is made available.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 516 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to donate, recycle or dispose of the respective products in accordance with national law consistent with Union lawArticle 20.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 524 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Without prejudice to paragraph 4 (a), (b) and (c), competent authorities shall be empowered to issue an order for the economic operators to provide evidence of remediation measures in accordance with Article 2, according to their individual responsibilities referred to in Article 5(3). The remediation plan and its implementation strategy must be agreed upon between competent authorities and must involve meaningful consultation of affected workers and stakeholders. Evidence that remediation measures have been correctly implemented should be obtained in consultation of the affected workers and stakeholders.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 535 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) that any product remaining with the economic operator concerned is donated, recycled or disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law at the expense of the economic operatorArticle 20.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 541 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Commission or competent authorities establish that economic operators have provided evidence to the competent authorities that they have complied with the decision referred to in paragraph 4, and that they have eliminated forced labour from their operations or supply chain with respect to the products concerned, and that effective processes have been put in place to prevent harm from occurring again in the future and in cases of not state-imposed forced labour that they have provided remediation in accordance with paragraph 4 new, the competent authorities shall withdraw their decision for the future and inform the economic operators.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 550 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Economic operators shall avoid simply disengaging from their operators in order to eliminate forced labour from their supply chains. In case efforts to prevent, minimise and remedy the situation fail, then the economic operator shall consider disengaging in a responsible way. Before potentially reaching a decision to disengage, economic operators shall engage meaningfully with stakeholders that would be impacted by such a decision. Responsible disengagement entails, as a minimum, complying with collective agreements and articulating escalation measures. Economic operators shall act in accordance with the July 2021 Commission and EEAS guidance on combatting forced labour in supply chains.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 556 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a reasonable time limit for the economic operators to comply with the order, which shall not be less than 30 working days and no longer than necessary90 days to withdraw the respective products. When setting such a time limit, the Commission or competent authority shall take into account, where relevant, the economic operator’s size and economic resourcesdue diligence activities and the likelihood that those will bring forced labour to an end within a reasonable period of time;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 564 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) all relevant information and in particular the details allowing the identification of the product, to which the decision applies, including details about the manufacturer or producer, the producer, the production site and the product suppliers;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 569 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall adopt implementingdelegated acts further specifying the details of the information to be included in the decisions. Those details shall as a minimum include details of information to be made available to customs authorities in accordance with Article 16(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure pursuant to Article 29.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 570 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. CThe Commission and competent authorities shall provide economic operators affected by a decision adopted pursuant to Article 6(4) the possibility of requesting a review of that decision within 15 working days from the date of receipt of that decision. In case of perishable goods, animals and plants, that time limit shall be 5 working days. The request for review shall contain information which demonstrates that the products are placed or made available on the market or to be exported in compliance with Article 3.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 573 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. A request for a review of a decision adopted pursuant Article 6(4) shall contain substantial new information that was not brought to the attention of the competent authority during the investigation. The request for a review shall delay the enforcement of the decision adopted pursuant to Article 6(4) until the competent authority decides on the request for the review.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 575 #

2022/0269(COD)

3. AThe Commission or a competent authority shall take a decision on the request for review within 15 working days from the date of receipt of the request. In case of perishable goods, animals and plants that time limit shall be 5 working days.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 584 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The Commission and competent authorities shall ensure that any decision made by competent authorities, including a failure to make a decision, or a decision not to investigate, may be reviewed as an administrative decision of a public body in accordance with the Member States legal framework.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 589 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) any decision not to initiate an investigation following a preliminary phase of investigation,submission of information or a complaint, as referred to in Article 4(7)10;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 597 #

2022/0269(COD)

2. The Commission shall make available the decisions, and the withdrawals referred to in the paragraph 1, points (c), (d), (e) and (g) on a dedicated public website.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 601 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Submissions of information by any natural or legal person or any association not having legal personality, to competent authorities on alleged violations of Article 3 shall contain information on the economic operators or products concerned and provide the reasons substantiating the allegationThe Commission shall establish a mechanism to receive complaints and information regarding alleged or suspected forced labour, taking place within or outside the EU, from any natural or legal person, including workers or others affected or potentially affected by forced labour, civil society organisations including trade unions, affected communities, and any other individual or group that may have information regarding products which are alleged or suspected to be made by forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 607 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Submissions of information and complaints on alleged violations of Article 3 shall contain information on the economic operators or products concerned and provide the reasons substantiating the allegation. Submissions may be addressed to the Commission or one or more competent authorities. The Commission shall receive a copy of submissions received by competent authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 611 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Complaints may be lodged anonymously. The Commission and competent authorities shall ensure that the mechanism is designed so that victims or witnesses of forced labour may lodge complaints without fearing retaliation of any sort, without prejudice to Directive 2004/81/EC, Directive 2009/52/EC, Directive 2011/36/EU and Directive 2012/29/EU. These rights should not be made conditional on the affected workers’ residence status, or on their citizenship or nationality.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 612 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. The Commission shall determine the rules and procedure to assign complaints to the competent authorities. These rules will take into account the specificities of the complaint, the domicile of the economic operator and the capacities of the competent authorities in concerned Member States. The Commission may retain the power to investigate.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 614 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall, as soon as possible, inform the person or association referred to in paragraph 1 a of the outcome of the assessment of their submission or complaint as well as the decision referred to in Article 9 a.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 617 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Competent authorities and the Commission shall ensure that the identity of the person or persons reporting complaints, providing evidence, and of any individuals who are potentially being subjected to forced labour in terms of the complaint or investigation, is not disclosed without the explicit consent of that or those persons, to anyone beyond the authorised staff members competent to receive or follow up on complaints. This shall also apply to any other information from which the identity of the reporting person may be directly or indirectly deduced.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 622 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas, sectors or with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall include a list of forced labour high risk areas and shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities. Special attention will be paid to countries showing no or insignificant progress with respect to the elimination of forced child labour, the implementation of the 182 ILO Convention and other relevant conventions and protocols.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 637 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made easily accessible and publicly available by the external expertise at the latest 2418 months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 656 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall make the mechanism referred to in Article 10 and the list of the designated competent authorities publicly available on its website and shall regularly update that list, based on the updates received from Member States.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 658 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that the designated competent authorities exercise their powers impartially, transparently and with due respect for obligations of professional secrecy. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities have the necessary powers, expertise and resources to carry out the investigations, including sufficient budgetary and other resources and coordinate closely with the national labour inspections and judicial and law enforcement authorities, including those responsible for the fight against trafficking in human beings.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 665 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Decisions taken by the Commission or a competent authority in one Member State shall be recognised and enforced by competent authorities in the other Member States in so far as they relate to products with the same identification and from the same supply chain for which forced labour has been found.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 670 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. A competent authority that has received, through the information and communication system referred to in Article 22(1), a request from the Commission or a competent authority of another Member State for information to verify any evidence provided by an economic operator shall provide that information within 15 working days from the date of receipt of the request.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 673 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5, a competent authoritythe mechanism referred to in Article 10 shall verify in the information and communication system referred to in Article 22(1) whether there is a lead authority referred to in paragraph 3 investigating the same product and economic operator.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 684 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Customs authorities shall be provided with information identifying the product, information about the manufacturer, transporter, distributor, packaging or storage company or the producer and information about the product suppliers as regards products entering or leaving the Union market that have been identified by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 1, unless the provision of such information is already required pursuant to customs legislation referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 687 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Where customs authorities identify a product entering or leaving the Union market that may, in accordance with a decision received pursuant to Article 15(3), be in violation of Article 3, they shall suspend the release for free circulation or the export of that product. Customs authorities shall immediately notify the relevant competent authorities of the suspension and transmit all relevant information to enable them to establish whether the product is covered by a decision communicated pursuant to Article 15(3).
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 690 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where the release for free circulation or the export of a product has been suspended in accordance with Article 17, the product shall be released for free circulation or exported where all the other requirements and formalities relating to such a release or export have been fulfilled and where either of the following conditions is satisfied:within 4 working days of the suspension, the competent authorities informed the customs authorities of their approval for release for free circulation or export pursuant to this Regulation. In case of perishable products, animals and plants that time limit shall be 2 working days.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 691 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) within 4 working days of the suspension, if the competent authorities have not requested the customs authorities to maintain the suspension. In case of perishable products, animals and plants that time limit shall be 2 working days;deleted
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 695 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the competent authorities informed the customs authorities of their approval for release for free circulation or export pursuant to this Regulation.deleted
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 698 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. Where the competent authorities conclude that a product that has been notified to them in accordance with Article 17 is a product made with forced labour pursuant to a decision referred to in Article 6(2) and (4), they shall require customs authorities not to release it for free circulation nor to allow its export.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 709 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where the release for free circulation or export of a product has been refused in accordance with Article 19, customs authorities shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the product concerned is donated to public interest purposes or recycled or if that is not possible the products should be disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law. Articles 197 and 198 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 shall apply accordingly.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 714 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. To enable a risk-based approach for products entering or leaving the Union market and to ensure that controls are effective and performed in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation, the Commission, competent authorities and customs authorities shall cooperate closely and exchange risk-related information.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 719 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Cooperation among the Commission, the mechanism referred to in Article 10 and other relevant authorities and exchange of risk information necessary for the fulfilment of their respective functions under this Regulation, including through electronic means, shall take place between the following authorities:
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 731 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall issue guidelines no later than 182 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, which shall include the following:
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 736 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, including forced child labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, CSOs and existing collaborative multistakeholders initiatives as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 742 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) information on risk indicators of forced labour, which shall be based on independent and verifiable information, including reports from international organisations, in particular the International Labour Organization, including the ‘Hard to See, Harder to Count’ guidelines, civil society, business organisations, and experience from implementing Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 745 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) guidance for stakeholders to submit information or a complaint, in accordance with Article 10;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 762 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. A Union Network Against Forced Labour Products (‘the Network’) is established by the Commission. The Network shall serve as a platform for structured coordination and cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission, and to streamline the practices of enforcement of this Regulation within the Union, thereby making enforcement more effective and coherent.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 764 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. The Network shall be composed of representatives from each Member States’ competent authority, representatives from the Commission and, where appropriate, experts from the customs authorities. EU delegations, particularly based in countries with regions identified as of high risk of forced labour, shall also be involved in the work of this Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 765 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. The Network shall be led by the Commission and composed of representatives from each Member States’ competent authority, representatives from the Commission, the European Labour Authority, the Fundamental Rights Agency and, where appropriate, experts from the customs authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 768 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) conduct joint investigations, mandate research or monitor situation of wide-spread and systemic forced labour including as to expand database of risk of forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 771 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) contribute to the development of guidance to ensure the effective and uniform application of this Regulation and coordinate dissemination efforts;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 778 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) promote collaboration and exchange with relevant existing multi- stakeholders’ collaborative initiatives;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 780 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) coordinate dissemination efforts in and outside the EU;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 782 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Network may invite experts and stakeholders, including social partners and other workers’ representatives as well as civil society representatives to attend meetings of the Network or to provide written contributions or trainings for the Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 786 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall support and encouraglead and facilitate cooperation between enforcement authorities through the Network and participate in the meetings of the Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 788 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall provide the Network with the financial and human resources to carry out its missions.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 793 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. Where requested, tThe Commission, Member States and competent authorities shall treat the identity of those who provide information, or the information provided, as confidential. A request for confidentiality shall be accompanied by a non-confidential summary of the information supplied or by a statement of the reasons why the information cannot be summarised in a non-confidential manner.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 794 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – title
International Cooperation and Accompanying Measures
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 797 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission may as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis. Existing dialogue structures with third countries include the (sub)committees on trade and sustainable development in trade agreements or the dialogue foreseen within the Generalised System of Preferences.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 798 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission mayshall as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, and civil society representatives andincluding business organisations, trade unions, workers organisations, NGOs and networks of affected stakeholders. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 805 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, cooperation with, amongst others, international organisations, civil society representatives, business organisations and competent authorities of third countries mayshall result in the Union developing accompanying measures to support the efforts of companies and partner countries efforts and locally available capacities in tackling forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 807 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission and Member States shall develop cooperation and partnership mechanisms with third countries to address the root causes of forced labour, and build the capacity of upstream economic actors to respond to the requirements under this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 808 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The Commission and competent authorities shall cooperate with relevant authorities of third countries to carry out investigations, as well as coordinate when it is relevant with investigations made by other countries and align with decisions made by other international entities. Member States’ competent authorities and the Commission shall actively exchange knowledge and intelligence with third country governments.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 809 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. The following accompanying measures are foreseen: a) supportive development policies to governments in producer countries to guarantee, protect and fulfil their international human rights obligations to implement decent labour conditions, inter alia by: (i) removing barriers to freedom of expression and association, and increased recognition of land rights; (ii) building national social protection floor to reduce vulnerability to forced labour; (iii) providing social and economic assistance, including access to educational and training opportunities and access to decent work, notably for at- risk population groups to increase their employability and income-earning opportunities and capacity; (iv) developing coherent policies on employment and labour migration, which take into account the risks faced by specific groups of migrants, including those in an irregular situation, and address circumstances that could result in forced labour situations. b) supporting partner countries to develop encompassing National Action Plans on Forced Labour and worst forms of child labour, with the aim to: (i) address the root causes of workers’ vulnerability to forced labour; (ii) adopt and strengthen legislation on forced labour, covering the employment relationship of all sectors of the economy; (iii) provide effective protective measures to meet the needs of all victims, irrespective of their status (age, gender, ethnicity, migration status or any other ground for discrimination), for both immediate assistance and long-term recovery and rehabilitation; (iv) strengthen the enforcement of laws and prosecution; (v) raise awareness and engagement, especially for those who are most at risk of becoming victims of forced labour, including migrants, to inform them, inter alia, about how to protect themselves against fraudulent or abusive recruitment and employment practices, their rights and responsibilities at work, how to gain access to assistance in case of need and about the sanctions for violating the prohibition on forced or compulsory labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 810 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article26a Development cooperation The Commission and Member States shall develop cooperation and partnership mechanisms with third countries to address the root causes of forced labour as well as to build the capacity of upstream economic actors to respond to the requirements under this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 815 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The Member StatesCommission shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to non- compliance with a decision referred to in Article 6(4) and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented in accordance with national law.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 817 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasivetake the form of pecuniary fines and shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The maximum limit of pecuniary sanctions shall be not less than 5% of the total worldwide turnover of the undertaking in the business year preceding the fining decision. The collected sum shall be used for the compensation fund referred to in paragraph 2b.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 818 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. If an operator circumvents or attempts to circumvent a ban or sanction imposed in accordance with this Regulation, or when they refuse to cooperate with the customs or competent authorities, the competent authority shall be empowered to impose additional proportionate and dissuasive penalties, such as pecuniary fines.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 819 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. A compensation fund shall be established by a delegated act to be adopted no later than 2 years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 825 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 a (new)
Article30a Review and annual reporting 1. No later than three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out a first review with particular attention to the effectiveness of the instrument, proposing additional measures where deemed appropriate. 2. No later than one year after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present annually a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 33 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In health systems, personal electronic health data is usually gathered in electronic health records, which typically contain a natural person’s medical history, diagnoses and treatment, medications, allergies, immunisations, as well as radiology images and laboratory results, spread between different entities from the health system (general practitioners, hospitals, pharmacies, care services). In order to enable that electronic health data to be accessed, shared and changed by the natural persons or health professionals, some Member States have taken the necessary legal and technical measures and set up centralised infrastructures connecting EHR systems used by healthcare providers and natural persons. Alternatively, some Member States support public and private healthcare providers to set up personal health data spaces to enable interoperability between different healthcare providers. Several Member States have also supported or provided health data access services for patients and health professionals (for instance through patients or health professional portals). They have also taken measures to ensure that EHR systems or wellness applications are able to transmit electronic health data with the central EHR system (some Member States do this by ensuring, for instance, a system of certification). However, not all Member States have put in place such systems, and the Member States that have implemented them have done so in a fragmented manner. In order to facilitate the free movement of personal health data across the Union and avoid negative consequences for patients when receiving healthcare in cross-border context, Union action is needed in order to ensure individuals have improved acess to their own personal electronic health data and are empowered to share it.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Timely and full access of health professionals to the medical records of patients is fundamental for ensuring continuity of care and avoiding duplications and errors. However, due to a lack of interoperability, in many cases, health professionals cannot access the complete medical records of their patients and cannot make optimal medical decisions for their diagnosis and treatment, which adds considerable costs for both health systems and natural persons and may lead to worse health outcomes for natural persons. Electronic health data made available in interoperable format, which can be transmitted between healthcare providers can also reduce the administrative burden on health professionals of manually entering or copying health data between electronic systems. Therefore, health professionals should be provided with appropriate electronic means, such as health professional portals, to use personal electronic health data for the exercise of their duties. Moreover, the Commission and the Member States should agree on ambitious time-based targets to implement improved health data interoperability across the Union. The access to personal health records should be transparent to the natural persons and natural persons should be able to exercise full control over such access, including by limiting access to all or part of the personal electronic health data in their records. Health professionals should refrain from hindering the implementation of the rights of natural persons, such as refusing to take into account electronic health data originating from another Member State and provided in the interoperable and reliable European electronic health record exchange format.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Digital health authorities should have sufficient technical skills, possibly bringing together experts from different organisations. The activities of digital health authorities should be well-planned and monitored in order to ensure their efficiency. Digital health authorities should take necessary measures to ensuring rights of natural persons by setting up national, regional, and local technical solutions such as national EHR, patient portals, data intermediation systems. When doing so, they should apply common standards and specifications in such solutions, promote the application of the standards and specifications in procurements and use other innovative means including reimbursement of solutions that are compliant with interoperability and security requirements of the EHDS. To carry out their tasks, the digital health authorities should cooperate at national and Union level with other entities, including with insurance bodies, healthcare providers, manufacturers of EHR systems and wellness applications, as well as stakeholders from health or information technology sector, entities handling reimbursement schemes, health technology assessment bodies, medicinal products regulatory authorities and agencies, medical devices authorities, procurers and cybersecurity or e-ID authorities.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In the context of MyHealth@EU, a central platform should provide a common infrastructure for the Member States to ensure connectivity and interoperability in an efficient and secure way. In order to guarantee compliance with data protection rules and to provide a risk management framework for the transmission of personal electronic health data, the Commission should, by means of implementing acts, allocate specific responsibilities among the Member States, as joint controllers, and prescribe its own obligations, as processor. Furthermore, to ensure the technological sovereignty of the Union and ensure the highest security standards, the platform should be licenced under an open source licence in line with the Open Source Strategy 2020-2023 (C(2020) 7149 final) and Commission decision 2021/C 495 I/01. This will increase transparency and ensure consumer trust and confidence in the platform.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 51 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Users of wellness applications, such as mobile applications, should be informed about the capacity of such applications to be connected and to supply data to EHR systems or to national electronic health solutions, in cases where data produced by wellness applications is useful for healthcare purposes. The capability of those applications to export data in an interoperable format is also relevant for data portability purposes. Where applicable, users should be informed about the compliance of such applications with interoperability and security requirements. However, given the large number of wellness applications and the limited relevance for healthcare purposes of the data produced by many of them, a certification scheme for these applications would not be proportionate. A voluntary labelling scheme should therefore be established as an appropriate mechanism for enabling the transparency for the users of wellness applications regarding compliance with the requirements, thereby supporting users in their choice of appropriate wellness applications with high standards of interoperability and security. The Commission may set out in implementing acts the details regarding the format and content of such label.deleted
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) The distribution of information on certified EHR systems and labelled wellness applications is necessary to enable procurers and users of such products to find interoperable solutions for their specific needs. A database of interoperable EHR systems and wellness applications, which are not falling within the scope of Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and […] [AI act COM/2021/206 final] should therefore be established at Union level, similar to the European database on medical devices (Eudamed) established by Regulation (EU) 2017/745. The objectives of the EU database of interoperable EHR systems and wellness applications should be to enhance overall transparency, to avoid multiple reporting requirements and to streamline and facilitate the flow of information. For medical devices and AI systems, the registration should be maintained under the existing databases established respectively under Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and […] [AI act COM/2021/206 final], but the compliance with interoperability requirements should be indicated when claimed by manufacturers, to provide information to procurers.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) The categories of electronic health data that can be processed for secondary use should be broad and flexible enough to accommodate the evolving needs of data users, while remaining limited to data related to health or known to influence health. It can also include relevant data from the health system (electronic health records, claims data, disease registries, genomic data etc.), as well as data with an impact on health (for example consumption of different substances, homelessness, health insurance, minimum income, professional status, behaviour, including environmental factors (for example, pollution, radiation, use of certain chemical substances). They can also include person- generated data, such as data from medical devices, wellness applications or other wearables and digital health applications. The data user who benefits from access to datasets provided under this Regulation could enrich the data with various corrections, annotations and other improvements, for instance by supplementing missing or incomplete data, thus improving the accuracy, completeness or quality of data in the dataset. To support the improvement of the original database and further use of the enriched dataset, the dataset with such improvements and a description of the changes should be made available free of charge to the original data holder. The data holder should make available the new dataset, unless it provides a justified notification against it to the health data access body, for instance in cases of low quality of the enrichment. Secondary use of non-personal electronic data should also be ensured. In particular, pathogen genomic data hold significant value for human health, as proven during the COVID-19 pandemic. Timely access to and sharing of such data has proven to be essential for the rapid development of detection tools, medical countermeasures and responses to public health threats. The greatest benefit from pathogen genomics effort will be achieved when public health and research processes share datasets and work mutually to inform and improve each other.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 73 a (new)
(73 a) Consumers should be entitled to enforce their rights in relation to the obligations imposed on economic operators under this Regulation through representative actions in accordance with Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council. For that purpose, this Regulation should provide that Directive (EU) 2020/1828 is applicable to the representative actions concerning infringements of the provisions of this Regulation that harm or can harm the collective interests of consumers. The Annex to that Directive should therefore be amended accordingly. It is for the Member States to ensure that that amendment is reflected in their transposition measures adopted in accordance with Directive (EU) 2020/1828, although the adoption of national transposition measures in this regard is not a condition for the applicability of that Directive to those representative actions. The applicability of Directive (EU) 2020/1828 to the representative actions brought against infringements by economic operators of provisions of this Regulation that harm or can harm the collective interests of consumers should start from the date of application of this Regulation.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) manufacturers and suppliers of EHR systems and wellness applications placed on the market and put into service in the Union and the users of such products; (This amendment applies throughout the text.)
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) ‘non-personal electronic health data’ means data concerning health and genetic data in electronic formatin electronic format relevant for health research that falls outside the definition of personal data provided in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) ‘registration of electronic health data’ means the recording of health data in an electronic format, through manual entry of data, through the collection of data by a device, or through the conversion of non- electronic health data into an electronic format, to be processed in an EHR system or a wellness application;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point m
(m) ‘EHR’ (electronic health record) means an electronic collection of electronic health data related to a natural person and collected in the health system, processed for healthcare purposes;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point o
(o) ‘wellness application’ means any appliance or software intended by the manufacturer to be used by a natural person for processing electronic health data for other purposes than healthcare, such as well-being and pursuing healthy life-styles;deleted
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point ae a (new)
(ae a) ‘common specifications’ (CS) means a set of technical and/or clinical requirements, other than a standard, that provides a means of complying with the legal obligations applicable to an EHR system.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall establish a central platform for digital health to provide services to support and facilitate the exchange of electronic health data between national contact points for digital health of the Member States. The central platform shall be licenced under an open- source licence and published in the Open Source code repository of the EU institutions.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – title
III EHR systems and wellness applications
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. PNotwithstanding the obligations laid down in Regulation [AI act COM/2021/206 final], providers of high- risk AI systems as defined in Article 6 of Regulation […] [AI act COM/2021/206 final], which does not fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2017/745, that claim interoperability of those AI systems with EHR systems will need to prove compliance with the essential requirements on interoperability laid down in Section 2 of Annex II of this Regulation. Article 23 of this Chapter shall be applicable to those high-risk AI systems.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. EHR systems may be placed on the market or put into service only if they comply with the provisions laid down in this Chapter and in Annex II.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) draw up and keep up to date the technical documentation of their EHR systems in accordance with Article 24;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ensure that their EHR systems are accompanied, free of charge for the user, by the information sheet provided for in Article 25 and by clear and complete instructions for use in accessible formats for persons with disabilities;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) take without undue dimmediatelay any necessary corrective action in respect of their EHR systems whichen manufacturers consider or have reasons to believe that such systems are not in conformity with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II, or recall or withdraw such systems;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) immediately inform the distributors of their EHR systems and, where applicable, the authorised representative and importers of any corrective action, recall or withdrawal;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made their EHR systems available or put them into service of the non- conformity and of any corrective action taken;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made their EHR systems available, where manufacturers consider or have reasons to believe that such systems present a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) upon request of a market surveillance authority, provide itat least 6 months before placing on the market or putting into service their EHR systems, provide market surveillance authorities of the Member States concerned with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of their EHR system with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. If the manufacturer fails to cooperate with market surveillance authorities or if the information and documentation provided is incomplete or incorrect, market surveillance authorities shall take all appropriate measures to prohibit or restrict the relevant EHR system from being available on the market, to withdraw it from the market or to recall it until the manufacturer cooperates or provides complete and correct information;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. A manufacturer of EHR systems established outside of the Union shall ensure that its authorised representative has the necessary documentation permanently available in order to fulfil the tasks referred to in Article 18(2).
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Natural or legal persons may claim compensation for damage caused by a defective EHR system in accordance with applicable Union and national law. Manufacturers shall have measures in place to provide sufficient financial coverage in respect of their potential liability under Directive 85/374/EEC, without prejudice to more protective measures under national law.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Manufacturers shall make publicly available communication channels such as a telephone number, electronic address or dedicated section of their website, taking into account accessibility needs for persons with disabilities, allowing users to file complaints and to inform them of risks related to their health and safety or to other aspects of public interest protection and of any serious incident involving an EHR system.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 d (new)
3 d. Manufacturers shall investigate complaints and information on incidents involving an EHR system they made available on the market without undue delay and shall keep an internal register of those complaints as well as of systems recalls and any corrective measures taken to bring the EHR system into conformity.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 e (new)
3 e. Personal data stored in the internal register of complaints shall only be those personal data that are necessary for the manufacturer to investigate the complaint. Such data shall only be kept as long as it is necessary for the purpose of investigation and no longer than 5 years after they have been encoded.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Prior to making an EHR system available on the Union market, a manufacturer of an EHR system established outsidWhere a manufacturer of an EHR system is established outside of the Union, the EHR system may only be made available ofn the Union shallmarket if the manufacturer appoints, by written mandate, appoint an authorised representative which is established in the Union.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. An authorised representative shall perform the tasks specified in the mandate received fromagreed with the manufacturer. The mandate shall allow the authorised representative to do at least the following:
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) further to a reasoned request from a market surveillance authority, provide that authorityat least 6 months before placing an EHR system on the market or putting it into service, provide the market surveillance authorities of the Member States concerned with a copy of the mandate and with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of an EHR system with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II in an official language which can be understood by that authority;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) immediately inform the manufacturer if the authorised representative has a reason to believe that an EHR system presents a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection or if it is aware of any serious incident involving an EHR system;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(b b) immediately inform the manufacturer about complaints received by users;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) terminate the mandate if the manufacturer acts contrary to its obligations under this Regulation and immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which is established.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2022/0140(COD)

2 a. Where the manufacturer is not established in a Member State and has not complied with the obligations laid down in Article 17, the authorised representative shall be legally liable for non-compliance with this Regulation on the same basis as, and jointly and severally with, the manufacturer;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. In case of change of the authorised representative, the detailed arrangements for the change shall be clearly defined in an agreement between the manufacturer, or where practicable the outgoing authorised representative, and the incoming authorised representative.That agreement shall address at least the following aspects: (a) the date of termination of the mandate of the outgoing authorised representative and date of beginning of the mandate of the incoming authorised representative; (b) the transfer of documents, including confidentiality aspects and property rights;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the manufacturer has drawn up the technical documentation and the EU declaration of conformity and ensure that it is made available to market surveillance authorities at least 6 months before an EHR system is placed on the market or put into service;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) the manufacturer is identified and an authorised representative in accordance with Article 18 has been appointed;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the EHR system is accompanied by the information sheet referred to in Article 25 and appropriaby clear and complete instructions for use. in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. Importers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the address, the postal and electronic address and the telephone number at which they can be contacted in a document accompanying the EHR system. They shall ensure that any additional label does not obscure any information on the label provided by the manufacturer.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. Where an importer considers or has reason to believe that an EHR system is not in conformity with the essential requirements in Annex II, it shall not make that system available on the market until that system has been brought into conformity. The importer shall inform without undue delaymmediately inform the manufacturer of such EHR system and the market surveillance authorities of the Member State in which it made the EHR system available, to that effect. Where an importer considers or has reason to believe that an EHR system presents a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which the importer is established, as well as the manufacturer and where applicable, the authorised representative.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. Importers shall, further to a reasoned request from a market surveillance authority, provide itat least 6 months before placing on the market or putting into service an EHR system, provide market surveillance authorities of the Member States concerned with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of an EHR system in the official language of the Member State where the market surveillance authority is located. TheyImporters shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, and with the manufacturer and, where applicable, with the manufacturer’s authorised representative on any action taken to bring their EHR systems in conformity with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II, or to ensure that their EHR systems are withdrawn or recalled.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. If the importer fails to cooperate with market surveillance authorities or if the information and documentation provided is incomplete or incorrect, market surveillance authorities shall take all appropriate measures to prohibit or restrict its EHR system from being available on the market, to withdraw it from the market or to recall it until the importer cooperates or provides complete and correct information.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Importers shall verify whether the communication channels referred to in Article 17(3c), are publicly available to users allowing them to submit complaints and communicate any risk related to their health and safety or to other aspects of public interest protection and of any serious incident involving an EHR system. If such channels are not available, the importer shall provide for them, taking into account accessibility needs for persons with disabilities.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 121 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Importers shall investigate complaints and information on incidents involving an EHR system they made available on the market and file those complaints, as well as of systems recalls and any corrective measures taken to bring the EHR system into conformity, in the register referred to in Article 17(3e) or in their own internal register. Importers shall keep the manufacturer, distributors and, where relevant, authorised representatives informed in a timely manner of the investigation performed and of the results of the investigation.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7 d (new)
7 d. Personal data stored in the internal register of complaints shall only be those personal data that are necessary for the importer to investigate the complaint. Such data shall only be kept as long as it is necessary for the purpose of investigation and no longer than five years after they have been encoded.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the EHR system is accompanied by the information sheet referred to in Article 25 and appropriaby clear and complete instructions for use in accessible formats for persons with disabilities;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Where a distributor considers or has reason to believe that an EHR system is not in conformity with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II, it shall not make the EHR system available on the market until it has been brought into conformity. Furthermore, the distributor shall inform without undue delaymmediately inform the manufacturer or the importer, as well as the market surveillance authorities of the Member states where the EHR system has been made available on the market, to that effect. Where a distributor considers or has reason to believe that an EHR system presents a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which the distributor is established, as well as the manufacturer, the importer and where applicable, the authorised representative.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. Distributors shall, further to a reasoned request from a market surveillance authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of an EHR system. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, and with the manufacturer, the importer and, where applicable, with the manufacturer’s authorised representative on any action taken to bring their EHR systems in conformity with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II. or to ensure that their EHR systems are withdrawn or recalled.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Distributors that have received complaints from users about suspected incidents involving an EHR system they made available on the market, shall immediately forward this information to the manufacturer and, where applicable, the manufacturer's authorised representative and the importer. They shall keep a register of complaints, of non-conforming EHR systems and of recalls and withdrawals, and keep the manufacturer and, where available, the authorised representative and the importer informed of such monitoring and provide them with any information upon their request.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – title
Cases in which obligations of manufacturers of an EHR system apply to importers and distribuother economic operators
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
An importer or distributoeconomic operator other than the manufacturer shall be considered a manufacturer for the purposes of this Regulation and shall be subject to the obligations laid down in Article 17, where they made an EHR system available on the market under their own name or trademark or modify an EHR system already placed on the market in such a way that conformity with the applicable requirements may be affected.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5
5. Where common specifications covering interoperability and security requirements of EHR systems affect medical devices or high-risk AI systems falling under other acts, such as Regulations (EU) 2017/745 or […] [AI Act COM/2021/206 final], the adoption of those common specifications mayshall be preceded by a consultation with the Medical Devices Coordination Group (MDCG) referred to in Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or the European Artificial Intelligence Board referred to in Article 56 of Regulation […] [AI Act COM/2021/206 final], as applicable, as well as the European Data Protection Board referred to in Article 68 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 .
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 6
6. Where common specifications covering interoperability and security requirements of medical devices or high- risk AI systems falling under other acts such as Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or Regulation […] [AI Act COM/2021/206 final], impact EHR systems, the adoption of those common specifications shall be preceded by a consultation with the EHDS Board, especially its subgroup for Chapters II and III of this Regulation, and, where applicable, the European Data Protection Board referred to in Article 68 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. ThManufacturers shall draw up and keep up-to-date technical documentation shall be drawn up before the EHR system is placed on the market or put into service and shall be . The technical documentation shall be submitted to the markept up-to-datsurveillance authorities of the Member States concerned at least 6 months before an EHR system is placed on the market or put into service.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 140 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. The technical documentation shall be drawn up in such a way as to demonstrate that the EHR system complies with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II and provide market surveillance authorities with all the necessary information to assess the conformity of the EHR system with those requirements. It shall contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex III. In case the system or any part of it complies with European standards or common specifications, the list of the relevant European standards and common specifications shall also be indicated.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the identity, registered trade name or registered trademark, and the contact details of the manufacturer, including the postal and electronic address and the telephone number and, where applicable, of its authorised representative;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 67 to supplement this Regulation by allowing manufacturers to enter the information referred to in paragraph 2 into the EU database of EHR systems and wellness applications referred to in Article 32, as an alternative to supplying the information sheet referred to in paragraph 1 with the EHR system.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. The EU declaration of conformity shall state that the manufacturer of the EHR system has demonstrated that the essential requirements laid down in Annex II have been fulfilled. The manufacturer shall regularly update the EU declaration of conformity.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. By drawing up the EU declaration of conformity, the manufacturer shall assume responsibility for the conformity ofcompliance with the requirements of this Regulation and of all Union acts applicable to the EHR system.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 67 amending the minimum content of the EU declaration of conformity set out in Annex IV.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The CE marking shall be affixed before making the EHR system available on the market.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where EHR systems are subject to other Union legislation in respect of aspects not covered by this Regulation, which also requires the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the systems also fulfil the requirements of that other legislation.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Where a market surveillance authority, on the basis of the information and documentation demonstrating the conformity of an EHR system provided by the relevant economic operator, considers or has reason to believe that the EHR system presents a risk to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, including before the EHR system is placed on the market or put into service, it shall perform all the necessary checks to ensure that the system is compliant with this Regulation.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Where a market surveillance authority considers or has reason to believe that an EHR system has caused damage to the health or safety of natural persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall immediately provide information and documentation, as applicable, to the affected person or user and, as appropriate, other third parties affected by the damage caused to the person or user, without prejudice to data protection rules.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Such notification shall be made, without prejudice to incident notification requirements under Directive (EU) 2016/1148, immediately after the manufacturer has established a causal link between the EHR system and the serious incident or the reasonable likelihood of such a link, and, in any event, not later than 157 days after the manufacturer becomes aware of the serious incident involving the EHR system.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where a market surveillance authority makes, inter alia, one of the following findings, it shall require the manufacturer of the EHR system concerned, its authorised representative and all other relevant economic operators to put an end to the non-compliance concernedbring the EHR system into conformity:
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 155 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the EHR system is not in conformity with essential requirements laid down in Annex II and with the common specifications in accordance with Article 23;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the technical documentation is either not available or not complete, or not in accordance with Article 24;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the EHR systems is not accompanied by the information sheet provided for in Article 25, free of charge by the user, and by clear and complete instructions for use in accessible formats for persons with disabilities;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the EU declaration of conformity has not been drawn up or has not been drawn up correctly as referred to in Article 26;
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) the registration obligations of Article 32 has not been fulfilled.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31
Voluntary labelling of wellness 1. Where a manufacturer of a wellness application claims interoperability with an EHR system and therefore compliance with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II and common specifications in Article 23, such wellness application may be accompanied by a label, clearly indicating its compliance with those requirements. The label shall be issued by the manufacturer of the wellness application. 2. The label shall indicate the following information: (a) categories of electronic health data for which compliance with essential requirements laid down in Annex II has been confirmed; (b) reference to common specifications to demonstrate compliance; (c) validity period of the label. 3. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, determine the format and content of the label. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 68(2). 4. The label shall be drawn-up in one or more official languages of the Union or languages determined by the Member State(s) in which the in which the wellness application is placed on the market. 5. The validity of the label shall not exceed 5 years. 6. If the wellness application is embedded in a device, the accompanying label shall be placed on the device. 2D barcodes may also be used to display the label. 7. The market surveillance authorities shall check the compliance of wellness applications with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II. 8. Each supplier of a wellness application, for which a label has been issued, shall ensure that the wellness application that is placed on the market or put into service is accompanied with the label for each individual unit, free of charge. 9. Each distributor of a wellness application for which a label has been issued shall make the label available to customers at the point of sale in electronic form or, upon request, in physical form. 10. The requirements of this Article shall not apply to wellness applications which are high-risk AI systems as defined under Regulation […] [AI Act COM/2021/206 final].Article 31 deleted applications
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – title
Registration of EHR systems and wellness applications
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall establish and maintain a publicly available database with information on EHR systems for which an EU declaration of conformity has been issued pursuant to Article 26 and wellness applications for which a label has been issued pursuant to Article 31.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. Before placing on the market or putting into service an EHR system referred to in Article 14 or a wellness application referred to in Article 31, the manufacturer of such EHR system or wellness application or, where applicable, its authorised representative shall register the required data into the EU database referred to in paragraph 1.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 67 to determine the list of required data to be registered by the manufacturers of EHR systems and wellness applications pursuant to paragraph 2.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1
1. A European Health Data Space Board (EHDS Board) is hereby established to facilitate cooperation and the exchange of information among Member States. The EHDS Board shall be composed of the high level representatives of digital health authorities and health data access bodies of all the Member States. Other national authorities, including market surveillance authorities referred to in Article 28, European Data Protection Board and European Data Protection Supervisor mayshall be invited to the meetings, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them. The Board may also invite experts and observers to attend its meetings, and may cooperate with other external experts as appropriate. Other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, research infrastructures and other similar structures shall have an observer role.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 195 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented. The penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules and measures by date of application of this Regulation and shall notify the Commission without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1 a (new)
When deciding on the amount of the penalty in each individual case, all relevant circumstances of the specific situation shall be taken into account and due regard shall be given to the following: (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences, taking into account the nature, scope as well as the number of users affected and the level of damage suffered by them; (b) whether penalties have been already applied by other competent authorities to the same infringing party; (c) the size and market share of the economic operator committing the infringement; (d) the intentional or negligent character of the infringement; (e) any action taken by the infringing party to mitigate the damage of the infringement; (f) the degree of responsibility of the infringing party taking into account technical and organisational measures implemented to prevent the infringement; (g) the degree of cooperation with the competent authorities, in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement; (h) the manner in which the infringement became known to the competent authorities, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the infringing party notified the infringement; (i) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case, such as financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, directly or indirectly, from the infringement.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1 b (new)
The non-compliance of an EHR system with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, including the supply of incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to national competent authorities, shall be subject to penalties of up to 20 000 000 EUR or up to 6% of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. After 53 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out a targeted evaluation of this Regulation especially with regards to Chapter III, and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for its amendment. The evaluation shall include an assessment of the self-certification of EHR systems and reflect on the need to introduce a conformity assessment procedure performed by notified bodies, as well as the need to designate a public testing facility of a Member State as a Union testing facility, pursuant to Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 205 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2
2. After 75 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out an overall evaluation of this Regulation, and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for its amendment.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 209 #

2022/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 a (new)
Article 71 a Representative Actions Directive (EU) 2020/1828 shall apply to the representative actions brought against infringements by economic operators of provisions of this Regulation that harm or may harm the collective interests of consumers.
2023/03/09
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence of goods, misleading or false environmental claims (“greenwashing”), non-transparent, non-certified and non- credible sustainability labels or sustainability information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively. By ensuring that environmental claims are reliable and fair, consumers will be able to choose products that are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative impact on the environment.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards the environmental or social impact, durability or reparability of their products, including through the overall presentation of the products, Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended by adding the environmental or social impact, durability and reparability of the product to the list of the main characteristics of the product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on the social sustainability of products, such as working conditions, charity contributions or animal welfare, should not mislead consumers either. This includes statements such as “fairly produced”, “sustainable sound production”, "socially just". Making generic social claim should therefore be added to the Annex I of this Directive.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. In the same vein, fossil fuel advertising suggests absolute environmental benefit of fossil fuels that are likely to be understood as factual statements by consumers whereas this is misleading. To ensure the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to prohibit such claims, following a case- by-case assessment, when based on offsetting schemes or when they are not supported by clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader. S as well as complemented by a realistic implementation plan to achieve this future environmental performance through the establishment of interim targets, based on existent and economically viable technologies, and allocation of sufficient resources. Those plans should be made publicly available and regularly reviewed and updated. Traders relying on such claims should also be supported by an accredited independent monitoring system to monitor the progress of the traderimplementation plan with regard to the commitments and targets.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme or not established by public, comparison and information tools which were not pre-approved by a national or an EU authoritiesy should be prohibited by including such practices in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. The certification scheme should fulfil minimum transparency and credibility conditions. The displaying of sustainability labels remains possible without a certification scheme where such labels are established by a public authority, or in case of additional forms of expression and presentation of food in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011Such pre-approval of sustainability label, comparison and information tools should be subject to minimum requirements such as publicly available award criteria, developed through independent processes and going beyond what is required by EU legislation, impartial control procedures through accredited third-party verification schemes; accessibility and affordability for all market players, transparency for consumers on both processes and decision-taking; scientific robustness and stakeholder relevance, availability of compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms, regular review and update of award criteria. In case a sustainability label or an information and comparison tool concerns one environmental aspect of a product or service, this should be clearly displayed to consumers. All pre-approved sustainability labels and information and comparison tools should be registered in a database available to the public. Sustainability labels established by public authorities should not undergo a pre- approval procedure. This rule complements point 4 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC which prohibits claiming that a trader, the commercial practices of a trader, or a product has been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when it has not, or making such a claim without complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, 'natural', 'animal-friendly', 'cruelty-free', 'sustainable', ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, 'deforestation-free', ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘carbon-proof certified’, ‘carbon neutral certified’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘plastic neutral’, ‘plastic-free’, ‘biobased’ or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’ or ‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of excellent environmental performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claimy are based on offsetting of environmental impacts such as purchase of carbon or plastic credits, or whenever there is no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the claim, based on scientific and objective methodologies such as the Product Environmental Footprint set out in the Commission Recommendation(EU)2021/2279 or equivalent methods established under Union or national law, is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. For example, the claim ‘biodegradable’, referrThis is particularly important to prohibit claims suggesting tohat a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming or service has a neutral or positive carbon emissions’ impact on the environment in the sense that the packaging is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific claim, which does not fall under this prohibitiony mislead consumers by making them believe that the product they buy has no impact on the environment while it cannot be substantiated by scientific evidence.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The Circular Economy Action Plan24 provides for the need to set the rules on environmental claims using Product and Organisation Environmental Footprint methods. Additional requirements onsetting a pre-approval procedure for environmental claims will have to be set in specific Union legislation. Those new requirements will contribute to the Green Deal25 objective of enabling buyers to make more sustainable decisions and reduce the risk of greenwashing through reliable, comparable and verifiable information. __________________ 24 COM(2020)98 final, 11 March 2020. 25 COM(2019)640 final, 11 December 2019.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, including planned obsolescence practices,. Planned obsolescence is generally understood as a commercial policy involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time. Premature obsolescence of products can occur when there is no deliberate intent to limit the lifetime of a product due, for example, to a design issue that leads to early failure. Hence, some minimum durability and reparability requirements for products should be established in Regulation EU [Ecodesign for Sustainable Products]. Marketing products that do not respect these minimum requirements once established should be prohibited and give consumers access to remedies in case of infringement. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, early obsolescence practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased material waste. Therefore, addressing those practices are also likely to reduce the amount of waste, contributing to a more sustainable consumption.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) It should be prohibited to omit to informprovide the consumer that a software update, including a security update, that will negatively impact the use of goods with digital elements or certain features of those goods, even if the update improves the functioning of other features. For example, when inviting consumers to update the operating system on their smartphone, the trader will have to inform the consumer if such an update will negatively impact urthermore, it should be prohibited to supply security updates together withe functioning of any of ality updates or other features of the smartphone-related upgrades.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) It should also be prohibited to omit to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of the good introduceintroduce feature into the design of the good to limit its durability. For example, such a feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good after a particular period of time, or it could be a piece of hardware which is designed to fail after a particular period of time. The prohibition of omitting to inform consumersintroduction of such features of the goods complements and does not affect the remedies available to consumers when they constitute a lack of conformity under Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 . For such a commercial practice to be considered unfair, it should not be necessary to demonstrate that the purpose of the feature is to stimulate the replacement of the respective good. The use of features limiting the durability of the goods should be distinguished from manufacturing practices using materials or processes of general low quality resulting in limited durability of the goods. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from the use of low quality materials or processes should continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/771. __________________ 26 Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit presenting products as allowing repair when such repair is not possible, as well as omitting to inform consumers that it is not possible tothe marketing of products that cannot be repair goodsed, in accordance with legal requirements under Regulation EU [Ecodesign for Sustainable Products].
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Another practice associated with early obsolescence which should be prohibited and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is inducing the consumer intothe marketing of goods that require replacing the consumables of a product earlier than would otherwise be necessary for technical reasons. Such practices mislead the consumer into believing thats to situations where the goods will no longer function unless their consumables are replaced, thus leading themconsumers to purchase more consumables than necessary. For example, the practice of urging the consumer, via the settings of the printer, to replace the printer ink cartridges before they are actually empty in order to stimulate the purchase of additional ink cartridges would be prohibited.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit omitting to inform the consumer that the good ismarketing of goods that are designed to limit itstheir functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer. For example, the marketing of printers that are designed to limit their functionality when using ink cartridges not provided by the original producer of the printer without disclosing this information to the consumer would be prohibited. This practice could mislead consumers into purchasing an alternative ink cartridge which cannot be used for that printer, thus leading to unnecessary repair costs, waste streams or additional costs due to the obligation to use the original producer’s consumables which the consumer could not foresee at the time of purchase. Similarly, marketing smart devices designed to limit their functionality when using chargers or spare parts that are not provided by the original producer without disclosing this information to the consumer would be prohibited as well.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Audiovisual commercial communication influence consumer behaviour and encourage consumption of displayed products. Commercial communication are responsible for generating transactional decisions that would not have been taken otherwise. In order to engage consumers in the green transition, it is necessary that commercial communication be reserved for goods compatible with our environmental goals. Accordingly, those goods who have the worst environmental impact should be precluded from being promoted through commercial communications.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and stimulate the demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability and reparability should be provided for all types of goods before concluding the contract, through clear and easy-to-understand labels or, when such labels are not required under Union or national law, through minimum information requirements. Moreover, as regards goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the period of time during which free software updates are available in accordance with requirements under Union or national law, which is as a minimum, for a period of time that the consumer may reasonably expect. Free software updates should include both security and functionality updates, to be provided independently from each other. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should be amended to provide consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 2019/88228 . The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/77029 and (EU) 2019/77130 of the European Parliament and of the Council. __________________ 27 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64). 28 Directive 2019/882/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70). 29 Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 1). 30 Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771. Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders selling goods to inform consumers about the existence of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability for all types of goods, where the producer makes this iduration of the legal guarantee of conformity, and where available, its voluntary extension provided by the trader or the producer free of charge Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders selling goods to inform consumers before the conclusion of the contract through a label on guaranteed lifetime of a good. Such label should include as a minimum the duration of the legal guarantee of conformity, and where provided on a voluntary basis by the producer, the duration of its extension. Information on availableility of after-sales and repair services should also be provided.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The problem of limited durability contrary to consumer expectations is most relevant for energy-using goods, which are goods that function from an external energy source. Consumers are also most interested in receiving information about the expected durability of this category of goods. For these reasons, only for this category of goods, consumers should be made aware that the information about the existence of a producer’s commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years has not been provided by the producer.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Goods containing energy-using components, where those components are mere accessories and do not contribute to the main function of those goods, such as decorative lighting for clothing or footwear or electric light for a bicycle, should not be classified as energy-using goods.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the seller’s liability for lack of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the fact that many product failures occur after two years, the trader’s obligation to inform consumers about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability should apply to guarantees that are of more than two years.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The producer and the seller should remain free to offer other types of commercial guarantees and after-sales services of any duration. However, the information provided to the consumer about such other commercial guarantees or services should not confuse the consumer with regard to the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability that covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two years.deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) To promote competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements the traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time during which the producer commits to provide software updates for such goods. However, to avoid overloading consumers with information, such information should only be provided when this period is longer than the period of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, as that guarantee entails the provision of updates, including security updates, that are necessary to maintain the required functions and performance of goods with digital elements. Furthermore, information about the producer’s commitment to provide software updates is relevant only where the sales contract regarding goods with digital elements provides for a single act of supply of the digital content or digital service in respect of which Article 7(3), point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 applies. In contrast, there should be no new obligation to provide that information where the sales contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time, since for those contracts Article 7(3), point (b), ofAs a minimum this period of time should be the one the consumer may reasonably expect as required under Directive (EU) 2019/771 specifies, by reference to Article 10 (2) or (5), the period of time during which the seller is to ensure that the consumer is informed of and supplied with updates.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Likewise, traders offering digital content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader, commits to provide software updates, including security updates, necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. Information about the provider’s commitment to provide software updates is relevant only where the contract proLikewise, traders offering digital content and digital servidces for a single act of supply or a series of individual acts of supply in respect of which Article 8(2), point (b), of Directive 2019/770 applies. In contrast, there should be no new obligation to provide that information where the contract provides for a continuous supply over a period of time, since for these contracts Article 8(2), point (a) of Directive (EU) 2019/770 specifies the period of time during which the trader is to ensure that the consumer is informed of and supplied witshould also inform consumers about the minimum period during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is different from the trader, will provide software updates, including security updates, necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. This information should include as a minimum the mandatory period foreseen under EU law to provide such updates.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) To allow consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to repair, traders should providedisplay, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in accordance with Union or national law.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a reparability score is not established in accordance with Union or national law, traders should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information that is made available by the producer, such as information about the availability of spare parts, and a user and repair manual.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score, where the producer or provider of the digital content or digital service, when different from the trader, makes the relevant information availableduration of legal guarantee of conformity and, where provided by producer free of charge, its voluntary extension, the minimum period for updates and the repair information other than the reparability score,. In particular, as regards goods, the trader should convey to consumers the information that the producer has provided to the trader or has otherwise intended to make readily available to the consumer before the conclusion of the contract, by indicating it on the product itself, its packaging or tags and labels that the consumer would normally consult before concluding the contract. The trader should not be required to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites. Where the producer does not make this information available, the consumer should be informed thereof.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(oa) ‘generic social claim’ means any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, or specific and based on a certification scheme, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies that a product or trader has been produced in accordance with social justice issues such as gender or racial equality, or that a trader made specific commitments towards fundamental rights, labour norms' respect or working conditions throughout the conception, the manufacturing process of the product and its components, and its distribution, compared to other products or traders;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p
(p) ‘explicit environmental claim’ means an environmental claim that is in textual form or contained in a sustainability label;deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any explicit environmental claim in any form, not contained in a sustainability label, where the specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r
(r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, either public or private, that aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference to its environmental or social aspects or both , and for which criteria are publicly available free of cost, developed and regularly updated through independent processes, while reflecting significant improvements compared to minimum product requirements under Union or national law. This does not cover any mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 158 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(ra) 'pre-approval procedure’ means an ex-ante conformity assessment of the environmental claim, sustainability label or sustainability information tool by an EU body or a national competent authority based on requirements and criteria established in accordance with Union or national law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s
(s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open underaccredited in accordance with Regulation 765/2008 that is open under publicly available transparent, fair and non- discriminatory terms and at reasonable costs to all traders willing and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product complies with certain transparent, scientific, verifiable and publicly available requirements, and for which the monitoring of compliance isand award of the certificate are objective, based on international, Union or national standards and procedures and carried out by a party independent from both the scheme owner and the trader;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t
(t) ‘sustainability information and comparison tool’ means software, including a website, part of a website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which compares products on those aspects; . Any comparison shall be objective, by, in particular, comparing products or features of a product which serve the same function, using a common methodology based on verifiable data;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) ‘durability’ means durthe ability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council**; ______ ** Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).’of a product to function and maintain for a certain period of time its required function and performance under normal conditions of use, maintenance and repair;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new)
(va) ‘premature obsolescence’ means practices that lead to the shortening of a product’s lifespan, either through its design or by not providing essential elements required for the product’s functioning;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point w a (new)
(wa) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given good, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device or bring it into conformity;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point w b (new)
(wb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the good in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities or implement new functionalities;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new)
(ya) ‘offsetting’ means the purchase of credits, such as carbon or plastic credits, or provision of financial support for environmental projects, such as reforestation and renewable energy installation, to allegedly compensate for the purchaser’s own environmental impact, or of their goods or services.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, execution, composition, environmental or social impact, accessories, durability, reparability, reusability, recyclability, after- sale customer assistance and complaint handling, method and date of manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, quantity, specification, geographical or commercial origin or the results to be expected from its use, or the results and material features of tests or checks carried out on the product.;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance without clear, objectiveof a trader based on offsetting schemes or without publicly available, clear, time-bound, objective, quantified, science-based and verifiable commitments and targets, and without an independent monitoring system; accredited in accordance with Regulation (EC) N°765/2008. Commitments and targets shall be complemented by a implementation plan to be updated annually based on economically and technically-viable technologies.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 197 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 12 a (new)
(3a) A new Article 12a is added : Article 12a Pre-approval and substantiation of environmental claims, sustainability labels and information tools 1. Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that any environmental claim, sustainability label or sustainability information tool put on the market by a trader has been pre- approved based on criteria and minimum requirements established in accordance with Union or national law. Environmental claims shall be based on and substantiated by generally accepted evidence. 2. Appropriate measures shall include the following: (i) Designation of a national competent authority in charge of receiving application for authorization and supporting evidence and take a decision whether to grant the authorization or not; (ii) Notification to the Commission on the applications received and decisions taken by the national competent authority; (iii) where appropriate, request additional information needed for the substantiation of the environmental claim. 3. The Commission shall establish a public registry of permitted environmental claims. Any use of non-permitted environmental claims by a trader shall be regarded as unfair in accordance with Annex I of this Directive. All previous decisions shall have an erga omnes effect to traders using a similar claim. 4. For the purpose of supporting national competent authorities in enforcing the provisions under this Directive, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act to further specify the rules for the preparation and presentation of an authorisation application.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 198 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a
(3a) ‘energy-using good’ means any good that depends on energy input (electricity, fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended;;deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a
(14a) ‘commercial guarantee of durability’ means a producer’svoluntary commercial guarantee of durability referred to in Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771provided by the producer free of charge, under which the producer is directly liable to the consumer during the entire period of that guarantee for repair or replacement of the goods;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 203 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b
(14b) ‘durability’ means durthe ability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 2019/771of a product to function and maintain for a certain period of time its required function and performance under normal conditions of use, maintenance and repair;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14e a (new)
(14ea) ‘security update’ means an operating system update, including security patches, if relevant for a given good, whose main purpose is to provide enhanced security for the device or bring it into conformity;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 209 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14e b (new)
(14eb) ‘functionality update’ means an operating system update that is not necessary to keep the good in conformity and whose main purpose is to improve current functionalities or implement new functionalities;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) the following points (ea) to (ed) are insertis replaced:
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a
(ea) for all goods, where the producer makes it available,a label indicating the guaranteed lifetime of the good, which should include information thaabout the goods benefit from a commerciduration of the legal guarantee of durabilconformity, and its duration in units of time, where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two yearwhere applicable, about the existence and duration of a voluntary commercial guarantee of durability by the producer, as well as information about the existence and conditions of after-sales services;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 220 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e b
(eb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available the information referred to in point (ea), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (e);deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e c
(ec) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum periothe minimum period, starting at the time of purchase, stated in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ea), the information on the updates shall be provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial guarantee of durabilityincluding the mandatory period foreseen under relevant Union law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e d
(ed) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum perio, the minimum period, starting at the time of purchase, stated in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of timeincluding the mandatory period of time foreseen under relevant Union law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 240 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) when point (i) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the period during which they shall be available and the procedure of ordering them, and abouttheir price, the availability of a user and repair manual. as well as availability and access to diagnosis and repair tools. When this information is not provided by the producer, the consumer shall be informed thereof;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 244 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
(-a) point (g) is replaced by the following: ‘(g) the arrangements for payment, delivery, performance, the time by which the trader undertakes to deliver the goods or to perform the services, the environmental impact of the delivery and the existence of more sustainable delivery options and, where applicable, the trader’s complaint handling policy;’;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 248 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) the following points (ma) to (md) are insertl) is replaced:
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 251 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m a
(ma) for all types of goods, where the producer makes it available,a label indicating the guaranteed lifetime of the good, which should include information thaabout the goods benefit from a commerciduration of the legal guarantee of durabilconformity, and its duration in units of time, where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a duration of more than two yearwhere applicable, about the existence and duration of a voluntary commercial guarantee of durability by the producer, as well as information about the existence and conditions of after-sales services;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 257 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m b
(mb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available information referred to in point (ma), information that the producer has not provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of more than two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (m);deleted
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m c
(mc) for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is provided in accordance with point (ma), the information on the updates shall be provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial guarantee of durability;including the mandatory period of time foreseen under relevant EU legislation.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 264 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point m d
(md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, the minimum period in units of time during which the provider provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time foreseen under relevant Union law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about the availability of spare parts, including the period during which they shall be available and the procedure of ordering them, and abouttheir price, the availability of a user and repair manual.; as well as availability and access to diagnosis and repair tools. When this information is not provided by the producer, the consumer shall be informed thereof
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish by [182 months from adoption] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 290 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from [2418 months from adoption].
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 2 a
2a. Displaying a sustainability label which iwas not baspre-approved onby a certification scheme or not established by publicnational or EU authoritiesy.;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 295 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 2 b (new)
2b. Displaying a sustainability information or comparison tool that was not pre-approved by a national or EU authority;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
(2) the following points 4a andto 4bh are inserted:
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product, service or trader’s activities when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the product.;, service or trader’s activities
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b a (new)
4ba. Claiming that a good or a service has a neutral or positive greenhouse gas emissions’ impact on the environment;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 306 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b b (new)
4bb. Making an environmental claim in relation to a product or service that promotes fossil fuels or highly polluting industries;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 307 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b c (new)
4bc. Making an environmental claim that was not pre-approved in accordance with the minimum requirements established in accordance with national or Union law;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 308 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b d (new)
4bd. Making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance at the level of a product;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 309 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b e (new)
4be. Making a generic social claim;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 4b f (new)
4bf. Claiming that a product is biodegradable and omitting to inform the consumer about the conditions under which biodegradability can be achieved based on recognised standards;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part
(4) the following points 23d to 23im are inserted:
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 318 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23 d
23d. Omitting to inform the consumer thatffering a software update that will negatively impact the use of goods with digital elements or certain features of those goods even if the software update improves the functioning of other features.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 323 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23 e
23e. Omitting to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of a good introducedIntroducing a feature to limit itsthe durability of a good.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 329 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23 g
23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not or omitting to inform the consumer that goodsthat do not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23 h
23h. Inducing the consumer intoMarketing a good that require replacing of the consumables of a good earlier than necessary for technical reasons is necessary.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23 i
23i. Omitting to inform that a goodMarketing a good that is designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer..
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 342 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23i a (new)
23ia. Engaging in practices that lead to shortening of a product’s lifespan
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 344 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23i b (new)
23ib. Marketing a good without fixing a known design issue that leads to an early failure of the good in question;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23i c (new)
23ic. Supplying security updates together with functionality updates or other software updates;
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 347 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 23i d (new)
23id. Marketing a good that is not compliant with ecodesign requirements set in Regulation EU [Ecodesign for Sustainable Products]
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) on obligations for companies regarding actual and potential human rights adverse impacts and environmental adverse impacts, with respect to their own operations, products and services, the operations of their subsidiaries, and the value chain operations carried out by entities with whom the company has an established business relationship or that are in their value chain and
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) on access to justice for victims of the violations of the obligations mentioned above
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 125 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The nature of business relationships as ‘established’ shall be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months.deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Directive shall apply to companies which are formed in accordance with the legislation of a Member State and which fulfil , with the exceptione of the following conditions:micro-enterprises as defined by article 3(1) of Directive2013/34/EU;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the company had more than 500 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepardeleted;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 142 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the company did not reach the thresholds under point (a), but had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of this net turnover was generated in one or more of the following sectors: (i) the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear; (ii) agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages; (iii) the extraction of mineral resources regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 150 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 153 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 158 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) the extraction of mineral resources regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 183 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. This Directive shall also apply to EU Member states’ Export Credit Agencies covered in Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. This Directive shall also apply to large as well as listed small and medium- sized companies which are formed in accordance with the legislation of a third country, and fulfil one of the following conditions:have generated a net turnover of more than EUR 8 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 187 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 192 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 40 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year, provided that at least 50% of its net worldwide turnover was generated in one or more of the sectors listed in paragraph 1, point (b).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 197 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘adverse environmental and climate impact’ means an adverse impact on the environment or climate resulting from the violation of one of the prohibitions and obligations pursuantestablished under international environmental and climate legislation including but not limited to the international environmental conventions listed in the Annex, Part II;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 198 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) ‘high-impact sector’ means any of the following: (i) the energy sector, including gas, nuclear, steam, electricity and other sources throughout their life cycle, from extraction, refining, production, combustion of fuels, transportation, storage and waste management including radioactive waste; (ii) the production, use and disposal of organic and inorganic chemicals, including pharmaceuticals, plant protection products and fertilisers; (iii) the manufacture of textiles, apparel, leather, fur and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade and retail of textiles, clothing and footwear; (iv) plastic production, waste shipment and management; (v) agriculture, water supply, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the management of land and resources (including in relation to nature conservation or other related activities), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, animal products, wood, food, beverages; (vi) construction sector and building infrastructures; (vii) transportation sector, logistics and storage; (viii) the extraction and refining of mineral resources, transport and handling, regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, naturalgas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products, and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metal sand metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products); (ix) the production, use and waste management of electronic products; (x) waste management sector; (xi) employment activities; (xii) health care, social care and elder care; (xiii) cleaning and household services; (xiv) hospitality; (xv) the services provided by regulated financial undertakings defined in Art. 3(a)(iv) such as loan, credit, financing, investment, pensions, securitisation, insurance and reinsurance, market funding, risk management, payment services and other financial services; (xvi) technology, digital activities and online platforms; (xvii) manufacture of weapons and ammunition, including dual-use items, manufacture of military fighting vehicles; (xviii) private security activities and security systems service activities, including the development and operation of biometrics and surveillance technologies;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 200 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
(e) ‘business relationship’ means a relationship withbetween the company or one of its subsidiaries and a contractor, subcontractor or any other legal entities (‘partner’)within their value chain (‘partner’) which are directly linked to the company’s operations, products or services
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 203 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) with whom the company has a commercial agreement or to whom the company provides financing, insurance or reinsurance, ordeleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 204 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point ii
(ii) that performs business operations related to the products or services of the company for or on behalf of the company;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 208 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘established business relationship’ means a business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chain;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 214 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘value chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company and its subsidiaries, including the development of the product or the service and the use, waste management and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘value chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities; or its subsidiaries.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 218 #

2022/0051(COD)

(h) ‘independent third-party verification’ means verification of the compliance by a company, or parts of its value chain, with human rights and, good governance, environmental and climate requirements resulting from the provisions of this Directive by an auditorentity which is independent from the company, free from any conflicts of interests, has experience, expertise and competence in environmental, climate and human rights matters and is accountable for the quality and reliability of the audit;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 220 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ‘industry initiative’ means a combination of voluntary value chain due diligence procedures, tools and mechanisms,hat: (i) are voluntarily adopted by companies, and, when adopted, are binding companies and, if applicable, their partners, (ii) includinge independent third- party verifications,audit, (iii) include the perspectives of civil society in audits and the steering of the standards and grievance mechanisms according to the effectiveness criteria of the UNGP, (iv) are developed and overseen by governments, industry associations or groupings of interested organisations, subject to the prior approval of the European Network of Supervisory Authorities;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 223 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) ‘severe adverse impact’ means an adverse environmental and climate impact or an adverse human rights impact that is or could be especially significant by its nature, or affects or could affect a large number of persons or a large area of the environment, or which is or could be irreversible, or is particularly difficult to remedy as a result of the measures necessary to restore the situation prevailing prior to the impact;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 225 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘stakeholders’ means: (i) the company’s employees, the employees of its subsidiaries, and other individuals, groups, communities or entities whose rights or interests are or could be affected by the products, services and operations of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationshipsworkers, the workers of its subsidiaries, its small shareholders and other individuals, groups, communities, including indigenous peoples, entities or civil society organisations whose rights or interests are or could be affected by the products, services and operations or by the potential or actual adverse impacts on human rights, climate or the environment of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationships across the entire value chain; (ii) organisations representing the individuals, groups, communities or entities included in (i); (iii) organisations who have as a statutory purpose the defence of human rights, good governance, the environment or climate;and (iv) other legal or natural persons engaged in the defence of human rights, good governance, the environment or climate;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 232 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q
(q) ‘appropriate measure’ means a measure that is capable of achieving the objectives of due diligence and effectively addressing the adverse impact, commensurate with the degree of severity and the likelihood of the adverse impact, and reasonably available to the company, taking into account the circumstances of the specific case, including characteristics of the economic sector and of the specific business relationship and the company’s influence thereof, the company’s ability to increase its influence thereof and the need to ensure prioritisation of action.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 235 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new)
(q a) ‘conflict-affected and high-risk areas’ means areas in a state of armed conflict or fragile post-conflict, areas under occupation and/or annexation, as well as areas witnessing weak or non- existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and severe violations of international humanitarian and/or human rights law;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 236 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that companies conduct human rights and, environmental and climate due diligence as laid down in Articles 5 to 11 (‘due diligence’) by carrying out the following actions:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 237 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) engaging with stakeholders in good faith and in an effective and meaningful way throughout the whole due diligence process;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 238 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a Hightened due diligence in conflict affected and high risk areas Member States shall ensure that companies operating in situations of armed conflict or military occupation respect their obligations under international humanitarian law. Member States shall ensure that in conflict- affected and high-risk areas undertakings conduct heightened, conflict-sensitive due diligence on all their operations and business relations through integrating a conflict analysis, based on meaningful and conflict-sensitive stakeholder engagement of the root causes, triggers and parties driving the conflict, and the impact of the company’s business activities on the conflict into their due diligence.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 240 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that companies integrate due diligence into all their corporate policies and have in place a due diligence policy. The due diligence policy shall be developed in consultation with all stakeholders and shall contain all of the following:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 241 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence across the value chain, including the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to established business relationships.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 243 #

2022/0051(COD)

1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to identify actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from their own operations or those of their subsidiaries and, where related to their value chains, from their established business relationships, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4, products and services in their operations and business relationships.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 246 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (b), and Article 2(2), point (b), shall only be required to identify actual and potential severe adverse impacts relevant to the respective sector mentioned in Article 2(1), point (b).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 247 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. When companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, identification of actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts shall be carried out only before providing that service..deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 248 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that, for the purposes of identifying the adverse impacts referred to in paragraph 1 based on, where appropriate, quantitative and qualitative information, companies are entitled to make use of appropriate resources, including independent reports and information gathered through the complaints procedure provided for in Article 9. Companies shall, where relevant, also carry out consultations with potentially affected groups including workers and other relevant stakeholders to gather information on, identify and assess actual or potential adverse impacts.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 259 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Where the adverse impact cannot be brought to an end immediately, Member States shall ensure that companies minimise the extent of such an impact. while continuing to pursue all efforts, proportionate to the significance and scale of the adverse impact, in order to bring the adverse impact to an end
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 260 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Companies shall be required to take appropriate measures, including the following actions, where relevant:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 263 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) where necessary due to the fact that the adverse impact cannot be immediately brought to an end, develop and implement a corrective action plan with reasonable and clearly defined timelines for action and qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuring improvement. Where relevant, tThe corrective action plan shall be developed in consultation with stakeholders and shall be publicly available;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 264 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) seekobtain contractual assurances from a direct partner with whom it has an establishednd other assurances regarding its business relationship that it will ensures of compliance with the code of conduct and, as necessary, a corrective action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that they are part of the value chain (contractual cascading). When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 5 shall apply. With regards to contractual assurances the terms shall be reasonable and non- discriminatory. In cases where the business relationship is active in a high risk sector as defined in article 3 (b)(a), the assurances shall also include details on ensuring compliance with regards to the risks that are specific to that sector.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 268 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which the company has an established business relationshipbusiness partners, in particular for SMEs, where compliance with the code of conduct or the corrective action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SMEbusiness partner;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 272 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
As regards actual adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that could not be brought to an end or the extent of which could not be minimised by the measures provided for in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, bringing the impact to an end is not possible, or where there is no reasonable prospect of change, the company shall refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection to or in the value chain of which the impact has arisen and shall. Companies shall, in consultation with stakeholders, identify and address the risks and impacts of their actions and, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take one of the following actions:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 278 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) temporarily suspend commercial relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing efforts to bring to an end or minimistigate the extent of the adverse impact, or
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 281 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned, only as a last resort and if the adverse impact is considered severe, systematic or state-sponsored. The company shall engage in a timely, efficient and meaningful manner with stakeholders impacted by the decision to disengage, in particular with the company's workers and their legitimate representatives, before reaching this decision. The company shall address the adverse impacts related to the decision to disengage and shall disclose, as part of its reporting obligation, the number of instances where it decided to disengage, the reason for this disengagement and the location of the concerned business relationships without disclosing their identity.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 289 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to suspend or terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 292 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract, when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 294 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies provide the possibility forestablish, in consultation with stakeholders, or participate in an effective complaints mechanism at operational level, both as an early-warning risk- awareness and as a remediation system, that can be used by persons and organisations listed in paragraph 2 to submit complaints and request remedy to them where they have legitimatreasonable concerns regarding actual or potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse, environmental or climate impacts with respect to their own operations, the operationproducts and services, the operations, products and services of their subsidiaries and their value chains.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 299 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States shall ensure that complaints procedures as established by companies, are legitimate, accessible, predictable, safe, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible and adaptable. Such mechanisms shall provide for the possibility to raise concerns either anonymously or confidentially, in accordance with national law.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 303 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Member States shall ensure that companies provide information to stakeholders, including in particular actual and potentially affected rights holders, on such complaints mechanisms, including on how to access them, on decisions and remedies relating to a company and on how the company is implementing them. All information shall be published in a manner that does not endanger the stakeholders’ safety, including by not disclosing their identity.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 304 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Member States shall ensure that stakeholders, including in particular actual and potentially affected rights holders, play a central role in the design and evaluation of such independent complaints mechanisms and in the provision of remedy.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 307 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Member States shall ensure that companies are enabled to provide a complaints mechanism through collaborative arrangements with other companies or organisations, by participating in multi-stakeholder complaints mechanisms or joining a Global Framework Agreement.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 308 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 e (new)
1 e. The body or person applying the complaints mechanism shall be entitled to make proposals to the companies on how potential or actual adverse impacts may be addressed and on how to improve the complaints mechanism.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 310 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall ensure that the complaints may be submitted by: all persons, groups, communities, entities and civil society organisations covered by Article 3 (n) as well as the natural and legal persons representing them, including in particular trade unions and other workers’ representatives.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 311 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) persons who are affected or have reasonable grounds to believe that they might be affected by an adverse impact,deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 315 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) trade unions and other workers’ representatives representing individuals working in the value chain concerned,deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 321 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) civil society organisations active in the areas related to the value chain concerndeleted.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 329 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the companies establish' complaints mechanism includes a procedure for dealing with complaints referred to in paragraph 1, including a procedure when the company or its internal complaint mechanism considers the complaint to be unfounded, and inform the relevant stakeholders, including workers and trade unions of those procedures. Member States shall ensure that where the complaint is well- founded, the adverse impact that is the subject matter of the complaint is deemed to be identified within the meaning of Article 6.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 332 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States shall ensure that complainants and their representatives are entitled
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 335 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) to meetengage with the company’s representatives at an appropriate level to discuss potential or actual severe adverse impacts that are the subject matter of the complaint.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 336 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) to request that companies fully remediate or contribute to the full remediation of actual adverse impacts. The remedy shall be proportionate to the significance and scale of the adverse impact
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 342 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and stakeholders, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, mayshall issue guidelines, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts. eneral as well as sector-specific and impact-specific guidelines, in particular for the high impact sectors defined in article 3 (b)(a). The issues to be addressed by the guidelines shall include the specific obligations under article 5 to 11 of this Directive as well as: (a) contexts, such as situations of conflict or occupation; (b) responsible purchasing practices; (c) gender-responsive and culturally responsive due diligence; (d) resource and information sharing among companies and other legal entities for the purposes of preventing, mitigating and remediating adverse impacts in compliance with competition law; (e)measures that companies should take to address the challenges faced by small holders, including access to a living income; (f) responsible disengagement; (g)hightened due diligence in conflict- affected areas.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 348 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) measures that companies should take to address the challenges faced by small holders, including access to a living income;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 349 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) hightened due diligence in conflict-affected areas.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 350 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) responsible disengagement;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 351 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall, in order to provide information, advice and support to companies and the partners with whom they have established business relationships in their value chains in their efforts to fulfil the obligations resulting from this Directive,. To this end, Member States shall set up and operate individually or jointly dedicated interactive websites, platforms or portals. Specific consideration shall be given, in that respect, to the SMEs that are present in the value chains of companiesuch information, advice and support shall be tailored to the specific needs of SMEs and shall be accompanied by the appointment or the establishment of an SME contact point.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 359 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission mayshall complement Member States’ support measures building on existing Union action to support due diligence in the Union and in third countries and may devise new measures, including facilitation of joint stakeholder initiatives to help companies fulfil their obligations.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 361 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Commission shall develop and implement measures to support safe participatory collection of independent data on human rights violations, good governance and environmental and climate damages and to undertake necessary actions for the data to be considered.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 363 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. The Commission shall review the EU‘s cooperation and trade instruments to ensure that they support the development of an enabling environment in third countries, with particular consideration as well as capacity building given to developing countries. The Commission shall develop guidelines for EU export credit agencies and set up an oversight mechanism to ensure that EU and Member States‘ funds and export credits operate in line with the principles of this Directive.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 365 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Companies may rely on industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives to support the implementation of their obligations referred to in Articles 5 to 11 of this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. The Commission and the Member States may facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcome. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, may issue guidance for assessing the fitness ofs empowered to adopt a delegated act on industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives. The criteria for assessing the fitness of an industry scheme shall include the perspectives of civil society in audits and the steering of the standards and complaint mechanisms according to the effectiveness criteria of the UNGPs. Reliance on industry schemes and multi- stakeholder initiatives shall not absolve the company of its individual responsibility and obligations to perform due diligence and prevent it from being held liable under article 22 of this Directive.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 376 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) they failed to comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 7 and 8this Directive and;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 380 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as a result of this failure an adverse impact that should have been identified, prevented, mitigated, brought to an end or its extent minimised through the appropriate measures laid down in Articles 7 and 8this Directive occurred and led to damage.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 386 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), it shall notshall be liable for damages caused bythat result from an adverse impact arising as a result of the activities of an indirect partner with whom it has an established business relationship, unless it was unreasonable, in they circumstances of the case, to expect that the action actually taken, including an prove they took appropriate meas uregards verifying compliance, would be adequate tos capable of preventing, mitigate, bring or bringing to an end or minimiseing the extent of the adverse impact.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 391 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the assessment of the existence and extent of liability under this paragraph, due account shallmay be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its value chains.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 392 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Where there is a civil liability claim for damages in accordance with art 22 paragraph 1 and 2, and that the claimant provides primafacie elements substantiating the likelihood of the respondent's liability under the directive, Member States shall take such measures as necessary to ensure that it shall be for the respondent to prove it has complied with its obligations as laid down in the directive and that the measures it took were appropriate.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 393 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
Where claimants have provided reasonably available evidence sufficient to support their action in accordance to paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that courts are enabled to order the defendant and third parties to disclose any evidence in their control, including evidence related to the nature of business relationships or the structure of the society, if requested by the claimant and in accordance with national procedural law, subject to the applicable Union and national rules on confidentiality and proportionality.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 397 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Member States shall ensure that the limitation periods for bringing actions for damages are at least ten years.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 398 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Member States shall ensure that right holders, groups of rights holders or any legal or natural person with a legitimate interest are entitled to seek injunctive measures before Union courts, including through summary proceedings. These shall be available in the form of a provisional or a definitive measure to cease a practice where that practice may constitute a breach of this directive, or the form of a provisional or a definitive measure to take action to comply with this directive.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 400 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Member States shall take measures to ensure the right to an effective remedy and to ensure that the costs and the length of the proceedings under national law do not prevent claimants from access to courts. These measures may include, among others, public funding, including structural support for victims of actual and potential adverse impacts, limitation of applicable court or administrative fees, or access to legal aid.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 402 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Member States shall ensure that trade unions, civil society organisations and other relevant actors acting in the public interest can bring representative actions before court on behalf and for the protection of the collective interests of victims of actual and potential adverse impacts, and that these entities have the rights and obligations of a claimant party in the proceedings.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 407 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – title
29 Review and report
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 408 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
No later than … [OP please insert the date = 75 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive and every 3 years thereafter], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals and shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Directive in reaching its objectives and assess the following issues:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 413 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) whether the thresholds regarding the number of employees and net turnover laid down in Article 2(1) need to be loweredthe impact of this Directive on SMEs, accompanied by an account and assessment of the effectiveness of the different measures and tools for support provided to SMEs by the Commission and Member States;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 418 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) whether the list of sectors in Article 2(1), point (b), needs to be changed, including in order to align it to guidance from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 420 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the effectiveness of the enforcement mechanisms put in place at national level and in particular of the sanctions and the procedures for civil liability;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 421 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(b b) the use and accessibility of complaints procedures and follow-up actions undertaken by companies and public authorities;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 422 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b c (new)
(b c) the involvement of stakeholders throughout all due diligence processes;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 423 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) whether the Annex needs to be modifiexpanded or updated, including in light of international developments
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 426 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) whether Articles 4 to 14 should be extended to additional adverse climate impacts.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 435 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – subheading 1
violations of EU and internationally recognized objectives and prohibitions included in environmental conventionsand climate conventions and Union legislation
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 436 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 1 a (new)
1 a. Violation of European environmental principles as defined in Article 191 TFEU;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 437 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 1 b (new)
1 b. Violation of one of the universally binding rules of customary international environmental law including but not limited to: (a) the obligation not to cause significant damage to the environment (prevention principle); (b) the principle that lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation (precautionary approach); (c) the obligation to carry out an environmental impact assessment for activities likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment; (d) the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution (polluter-pays principle).
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 438 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 12 a (new)
12 a. Violation of the obligation to take all measures consistent with the UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea (UNCLOS) that are necessary to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment from any source.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 439 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 12 b (new)
12 b. Violation of the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) as well as the Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean (Escazú Agreement).
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 440 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 12 c (new)
12 c. Violation of the 1992 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 441 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 12 d (new)
12 d. Violation of the obligations under the Paris Agreement
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Calls on the EU to ensure that all its trade instruments targeting OACPS countries such as EPAs, GSP and Aid for Trade are mutually reinforcing and aligned with the Policy Coherence for Development principle;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the statement of the UN 1. Economic Commission for Africa indicating that it believes the economic partnership agreements between EU and African countries could have negative consequences for intra-African trade; is concerned about the negative effects that the new Partnership Agreement between the EU and the members of the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS – Post-Cotonou Agreement) might have on intra-African trade and on the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area; calls on the EU to take full account of the levels of development and the needs of OACPS countries, ensuring coherence between EPAs and ACP regional economic integration priorities and efforts; calls on the Commission to refrain from launching or broadening EPA negotiations, including through the “rendez-vous” clauses unless ACP countries proactively make such demand; reiterates its request for an in-depth analysis of the impact of EPAs on local economies, regional integration, economic diversification and their compliance with the SDGs and the principle of Policy Coherence for Development; calls for a new equitable partnership between the ACP group of countries and the EU;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets that the Post-Cotonou framework pays little attention to persistent dependence of many OACPS countries on commodities and raw materials and to the need to ensure that the prices payed for these products duly reflect the real social and environmental costs of production; calls on the EU and OACPS countries to draw lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and to rethink fundamentally their economies and focus on sustainable and responsible value chains and market systems that preserve the environment and serve society as a whole;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reiterates that European companies have a responsibility for their value chains and urges the EU to live up to its commitments and urgently present an ambitious legislative proposal on mandatory human rights, social rights and environmental due diligence obligations for all companies operating in the EU internal market and to ensure that such proposal is based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights, applies to the whole value chain and includes provisions on access to justice;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Reiterates its call on the Commission to implement measures such as the prohibition of the importation of products related to severe human rights violations such as forced labour or worst forms of child labour; stresses the importance of including the objective of combating forced labour and child labour in TSD chapters of Union trade agreements;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Is deeply concerned about the fragile integration of OACPS countries and the detrimental impacts of the EPA’s for the survival of their agricultural producers, livestock keepers and fishermen; is worried with the high dependence of African states on food imports from the EU, particularly subsidised products that represent harmful competition for small-scale local agriculture and calls on the EU to put an end to these export subsidies, in line with its Policy Coherence for Development commitments; calls on the EU to ensure the Agreement and its implementing and supporting instruments respect the 2018 UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas; call upon the EU to support the creation of accountable funding mechanisms that support peoples’ effort to build food sovereignty, realise the human right to food, protect and restore ecosystems, increase agrobiodiversity, and address the climate emergency; recalls its view that stable investment and (wo)manpower for developing a resilient African food chain for regional circuits under African ownership could best contribute to increasing the health and wellbeing of African people;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that the agreement’s trade and investment provisions must be tailored to benefit all partierespect EU’s Policy Coherence for Development legal obligations, be tailored to benefit all parties and take full account of OACPS countries’ capacities, levels of development and needs; is concerned about a misbalance benefiting the EU over the OACPS countries; calls on the Commission to guarantee that the OACPS countries benefit from trade relations which are conducive to sustainable development; calls on the Commission to improve EU market access for OACPS producers and to enable OACPS countries, including with technical and financial support, to protect their infant industries, support small-scale farming and meet EU and international sustainability standards for exporting their agricultural products; calls on the Commission to promote sustainable investment opportunities to advances to advance towards a carbon- free economy and digital and green infrastructure in the OACPS countries, in line with its pledge in the Glasgow Climate Pact, while ensuring a responsible and sustainable sourcing and management of natural resources and raw materials, as well as sustainable waste management in line with its Green Deal objectives and the UN free prior and informed consent principle;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. RecogniStresses that the Western interpretation of sustainability has been applied in the Post-Cotonou Agreementsustainability provisions and their interpretation must be anchored in internationally agreed goals and commitments to which both parties have agreed; is concerned that the terminology of the agreement focuses on the goals and perspectives of the EU and does not duly take into account the value of local and indigenous knowledge; warns against any biased interpretation of such provisions; calls for an investigation into the differences in interpretation and application of sustainability criteria and the application of these criteria in the Post- Cotonou Agreement; to this end, reiterates its call for the systematic inclusion of independent binding and enforceable mechanisms for the implementation of Trade and Sustainable Development chapters on human rights, labour and environmental standards in all currently negotiated and future EPAs; stresses that the agreements need to be coherent with development policies and with the SDGs, especially with regard to their impact on deforestation, climate change and biodiversity loss and the ILO Decent work agenda; considering that there is a Decent Work Country Programme is less than half of OACPS countries, calls on the EU to foster their development where they do not exist yet in consultation with social partners and in liaison with ILO;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. calls on the African and European authorities to fight illicit financial phenomena, among others capital flight, tax avoidance schemes and national income loss due to tariff reduction and which tantamount to twelve times the annual figure for ODA;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. ICalls concerned the Commission to guarantee that the suspension clauses may not be legally valid; calls on the Commission to guarantee that the suspension clauses will be correctly applied in the event of violations ofwill be correctly applied as a measure of last resort in the event of violations of essential elements, where the parties are unable to reach a mutually acceptable solution, except in case of particularly serious and flagrant violation of one of the essential elements; emphasises that suspension of clauses should not harm the population, but should target those responsible for violations;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly stresses the important link between trade, inequalities, the eradication of poverty and support for sustainable development; underlines the role of women in the economies and societies of the OACPS countries; calls on the Commission to increase the participation of women in EU- OACPS trade and investment relations. and the need to ensure that trade and investment policies do not undermine these goals, in line with the Policy Coherence for Development obligation; underlines the role of women in the economies and societies of the OACPS countries and emphasizes that the empowerment of women and girls must be mainstreamed throughout the implementation of Post Cotonou framework; calls on the Commission to increase the participation of women in EU- OACPS trade and investment relations; calls on the Commission to update its 2009 communication on “The role of Fair Trade and non-governmental trade- related sustainability assurance schemes” in view of the implementation of the Annex to the trade policy review on the reform of the WTO and against the backdrop of the Sustainable Development Goals notably;
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2021/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. In view of the shrinking space for civil society, is concerned that the parties commit to strengthening the effective participation of civil society only “where appropriate” and calls on the EU to promote the establishment of institutional and operational structures and mechanisms for civil society systematic participation through a transparent, open dialogue and consultation process with EU and OACPS countries civil society actors; calls on the Commission to submit concrete proposals within 6 months after the 2022 EU-Africa Summit.
2022/01/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the EU taxonomy aims at facilitating the shift of investments from unsustainable economic activities to investment in activities that are needed to achieve environmental sustainability, and more specifically climate neutrality in the next 30 years;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas most investment treaties do not specify how the notions of ‘full reparation’ and ‘fair market value’ of an investment are to be ascertained; whereas panels have in the last decade predominantly interpreted such notions by using ‘forward-looking’ valuation techniques based on discounted cash flows methods (DCF) that calculate and aggregate expected future net income streams adjusted to the specific risks attached to the investment project; whereas the use of DCF methods has led in many well-documented cases to vastly larger amounts of compensation than the aggregate amounts of expenditure actually incurred by investors in host countries (asset-based or ‘backward- looking’ valuation methods);
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas the increasing recourse by investors to third parties to finance their litigation in exchange for a return or other financial interest in the outcome of a dispute (third-party funding) has exacerbated the imbalances underpinning compensation practices in litigation by further reducing the risks for investors of pursuing a claim, and thereby adding incentives to increase the number of claims; points out that third-party funding may increase the bargaining power of claimants to the detriment of States with limited resources, and weaker regulatory frameworks;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the need to ensure that the Joint Statement Initiative on Investment Facilitation abides to the rules of Articles IX and X of the WTO agreement, which require consensus and overall transparency;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Underlines the importance of an overall EU approach as regards investment facilitation at both bilateral and multilateral levels with an overarching focus on cooperation, including capacity building and technical assistance, notably as regards the support of digitalisation in developing countries; underlines also the need to avoid creating administrative burden for LDCs;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Points out that investment facilitation provisions at both IIAs and WTO level essentially focus on creating obligations for public authorities in ‘host countries’, but not for ‘home countries’ or for their undertakings; emphasises in that respect the need for integrating binding provisions as regards corporate social responsibility (CSR), human rights and environmental due diligence, as well as anti-corruption safeguards in investment facilitation frameworks; underlines also the need to integrate specific provisions for facilitating sustainable investments in host countries, including monitoring mechanisms on the activities supported by FDI flows;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Points out to the need to exclude investment facilitation disciplines from dispute settlement provisions of IIAs, including from investor-state disputes;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Welcomes the entry into force of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening Regulation in 2019; underlines the importance of such mechanism as a step for better monitoring FDI contribution to Europe's strategic interests; calls for further strengthening the instrument in the context of its forthcoming review process so as to have more granular data on whether inward FDI flows support sustainable economic activities and greenfield investments; is of the opinion that outward FDI flows should also be monitored, so as to better identify the activities supported by these flows;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 f (new)
2f. Notes that some recent IIAs have a strong focus on market access and investment liberalisation; stresses that while European investors can benefit from these agreements, investment liberalisation can also affect the ability of States and third countries to regulate foreign investments in their jurisdiction; urges the Commission to strictly protect EU and Member State policy space on energy, agriculture, fisheries, audio- visual, telecommunication and digital issues, as well as public services, when liberalising investments; stresses that liberalising investments without safeguards can lead to an increase in speculative short-term investments that can increase economic instability, especially in developing countries;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that the positive impact of signing investment protection treaties as regards the attraction of foreign investments is unproven in scientific literature;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. UStresses that global efforts to combat climate change will require a rapid transition to renewable energy and fast government action to reduce reliance on fossil fuels; underlines that such action will create stranded assets; strongly believes that taxpayers shall not pay for these stranded assets via damages awarded by investment tribunals; urges the Commission to exclude investments in fossil fuels or any other activities that pose significant harm to the environment and human rights from treaty protections, in particular investor-state arbitration mechanisms;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that even in the absence of legal proceedings, the explicit or implicit threat of recourse to investment arbitration can enhance the position of investors in negotiations with states (the ‘chilling effect’); is concerned that as a result, policy decision making might be delayed, watered down, or that more public funds may be spent on compensating the fossil fuel sector than would otherwise be the case, making it more costly and thus more difficult for States to undertake energy transition measures, representing an overall subsidy provided by taxpayers to the fossil fuel sector; stresses that while the right to regulate of States is acknowledged, it does not prevent them from having to comply with obligations established in IIAs, nor does it preclude compensation claims following the exercising of that right;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that investments, especially in mining, oil and gas extraction, logging, tourism and agribusiness operations can have far- reaching impacts on local communities, including Indigenous Peoples; notes that in numerous investor–state arbitrations, businesses have challenged actions that States claimed to have taken to address local concerns or unrest about a project’s impact;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is concerned that recent EU IIAs still contain broad protection standards which can be used to challenge legitimate public policies; asks the Commission to only allow protection against discrimination, direct expropriation and the gross denial of justice, and to ensure that foreign investors are not accorded superior rights to those enjoyed by domestic investors they directly compete with;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the fact that EU IIAs negotiated after 2009 still include sunset clauses which prevent easy termination; points out that Member States and the other contracting parties can agree to neutralise sunset clauses; calls on the EU to limit the sunset clause to one year maximum in investment agreements currently being negotiated, as well as in future agreements, and to modernise existing agreements accordingly;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines that the Discounted Cash Flows (DCF) methodologies generally used for calculating compensation does not represent a reliable valuation method for investments with long lifespans or with uncertain future income streams, neither for investments that are subject to risks that are difficult or impossible to quantify - such as geopolitical risks, vulnerability to technological obsolescence, nor for determining compensation for early or planning stage projects;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Underlines that the way the jurisprudence on compensation and damages has evolved, and thereby, the use of valuation methods, represents a significant departure from well- established compensation principles and practices in national and international legal systems that provide for significantly more constrained margins of discretion for adjudication; points out that such departure confers in practice greater rights to foreign investors than to domestic ones; calls for compensation to be capped at the amount of eligible expenditures actually incurred by the investors; underlines that balancing approaches should, as appropriate, determine compensation below such cap, so as to consider contextual elements such as non-compliance with undertakings of their legal or contractual obligations or commitments;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the increasing recourse by investors to third parties to finance their litigation in exchange for a return in the outcome of an award (third-party funding) is adding incentives to increase the number of claims; invites the Commission to support the prohibition or strong restrictions of third-party funding for investor-state disputes;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to upgrade its investment protection model adopted in 2015 in order to guarantee full compatibility with the European Green Deal objectives; and to provide clear guidelines on issues such as the limitation of substantive standards, including the definition of ‘investor’ and ‘investment’, as well as on provisions governing compensation, including a cap on compensation at the amount of eligible expenditures incurred by the investors; urges the Commission to use this updated model as a basis for authorisation of new Member States BITs;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Notes that the Investment Court System (ICS) still constitutes international arbitration; notes that unlike in national courts, arbitrators on the ICS roster would merely interpret with wide discretion the rights and substantive provisions enshrined in international investment agreements, without balancing such provisions with relevant public interest laws which were decided democratically; notes that only foreign investors would be able to bring cases under the ICS system;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Points out that the ECT is the most litigated investment agreement in the world today; welcomes efforts to modernise the ECT and the EU’s position to exclude protection for most fossil fuel investments; notes that investments considered ‘significantly harmful’ under the EU taxonomy would remain protected according to the EU’s position; underlines that amending the ECT requires unanimity of all contracting parties voting at the annual conference; regrets that the European Parliament does not get any access to the negotiating texts of the ECT modernisation negotiations;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 127 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Is concerned that despite the fact that the EU seeks to exclude some fossil fuels projects from protection, investments considered as “significantly harmful” under the EU taxonomy would stay protected according to the EU position as regards the ECT modernisation process;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Welcomes the fact that Italy notified its decision to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty as of 1 January 2015; notes that countries that have ratified or acceded to the ECT may terminate their membership 12 months after notification of withdrawal; regrets that investments realised before the exit date are still protected for 20 years, but welcomes that all new investments immediately stop being protected;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 138 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the Court of Justice’s clarification that ISDS provisions in the ECT are not applicable in the case of intra- EU disputes; notes with concern that the Achmea ruling did not deter arbitration tribunals from continuing to hear intra-EU investment disputes; that at least 73 intra EU cases are currently ongoing, including more than 40 intra-EU ECT based investment arbitration cases; notes with great concern that the Achmea ruling did not deter arbitration tribunals from continuing to hear intra-EU investment disputes; notes that the Commission is not in a position to amend the ECT to carve- out the intra-EU application of the ISDS provision; calls on the Commission and the Council not to let arbitration proceedings circumvent the jurisdiction of the CJEU and its case-law which forms an integral part of EU law;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Points out that while the enforcement of possible awards in these cases will be difficult in courts of the European Union, cases under ICSID rules can still be enforced in the courts of third states around the world; notes that these courts can order sovereign assets of EU Member States to be seized;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 142 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Calls on the Commission not to nominate arbitrators who have ignored judgments of the European Court of Justice to FTA or ICS rosters of arbitrators;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that in the context of the UNCITRAL Working Group III discussions, the EU and its Member States are pursuing the establishment of a standing mechanism to resolve investment disputes: the multilateral investment court; stresses, however, that this proposal does not cover the modernisation of substantive protection standards; notes that unlike in national courts, judges from the MIC would merely interpret with a margin of discretion the substantive provisions and rights enshrined in international investment agreements, without balancing these provisions with relevant public interest laws which were decided democratically; notes that only foreign investors would be able to bring cases to the MIC;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses that the ratification of pending EU trade and investment agreements will replace old Bilateral Investment treaties for some Member States, but will also bind a significant number of Member States that do not have existing Bilateral Investment Treaty with the partner countries, therefore increasing the risk of investment cases against EU Member States; emphasises that terminating existing outdated BITs enables Member States to regain policy space without expanding the system; is worried that in the case of EU trade agreements containing an integrated investment chapter with dispute settlement, such an investment chapter cannot be modernised or terminated without reopening the whole agreement;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Urges the Commission to develop an EU foreign investment strategy to incentivise and protect sustainable investments, without relying on investor- state adjudication, as well as to update its investment protection model adopted in 2015 in line with the requests of this resolution so as to guide the negotiations of new or updated EU agreements;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Acknowledges that certain NTBs can be justified and originate from multi- level governancRecalls that regulations which are useful for achieving a legitimate public policy objective should not be considered as NTBs but as a justified and legitimate means of legislating in the general interest; adds that the objective of abolishing NTBs must not challenge the Member States' right to regulate; urges the Member States, where such NTBregulations are absolutely essential, to ensure their proportionality and strict alignment with legitimate public policy objectives; non-discriminatory nature;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point a
(a) unjustified regulatory disparities and inconsistentadequate implementation of EU law, which force companies to commit resources to the laborious process of analysing provisions that are harmonised at EU level, diverting investments away from activities that create jobs or support growth;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 192 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that throughout the regulatory lifecycle, Member States and the Commission must share the responsibility of ensuring that single market rules are complied with and that citizens’ rights are enforced, workers' and consumers' rights are enforced; stresses the need for harmonised rules EU-wide on the frequency and quality of checks and other market surveillance activities, particularly in respect of product safety, and for the promotion of tools for the exchange of information between national authorities with a view to strengthening cooperation in this area;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the importance of monitoring, and therefore welcomes the Single Market Scoreboard as a performance monitoring tool; emphasises the need for a recurring debate on the outcomes of the Scoreboard at the highest political levels, ensuring political commitment to tackling the obstacles identifiedtakes the view that this monitoring tool should include qualitative components in addition to quantitative criteria, in other words it should take environmental and social indicators into account; emphasises the need for a recurring debate on the outcomes of the Scoreboard at the highest political levels, ensuring political commitment to tackling the obstacles identified not only from a business perspective, but also with regard to the challenges faced by workers, consumers and citizens, with due account for social and environmental policy considerations;
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2021/2043(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the NextGenerationEU recovery package, the EU guidelines for border management and free movement, transport green lanes, the EU Digital COVID Certificate to facilitate free movement, and further measures which aim to allow the single market to operate normally; takes the view that the recovery must be paved by sustainable development, fair transition, social inclusion and the creation of quality jobs
2021/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Whilst always acting within the framework of international law, it is essential that the Union possess an appropriate instrument to deter and counteract economic coercion by third countries in order to safeguard its rights and interests and those of its Member States and ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. This is particularly the case where third countries take measures affecting trade or investment that interfere in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act by the Union or a Member State. Such measures affecting trade or investment may include not only actions taken on, and having effects within, the territory of the third country, but also actions taken by the third country, including through entities controlled or directed by the third country and present in the Union, that cause harm to economic activities in the Union.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) Coercive measures by a third country targeting a single Member State have negative repercussions on the proper functioning of the internal market, creating for instance disruptions in supply chains. Ensuring a well-functioning and resilient internal market plays in this context a strategic role. It is therefore of particular importance to set rules that preserve the internal market from negative interferences and ensure necessary solidarity among Member States, as well as rules that preserve the EU capacity to make sovereign choices and adopt public policies, when considering Union measures in case of coercive measures by a third country. Those aspects should be taken into account to establish whether the Union's interest calls for the adoption of measures to counter coercion.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In accordance with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary and appropriate, for creating an effective and comprehensive framework for Union action against economic coercion, to lay down rules on the examination, determination and counteraction with regard to third countries’ measures of economic coercion. In particular, the Union’s response measures should be preceded by an examination of the facts, a determination of the existence of economic coercion, and, wherever possible, efforts to find a solution in cooperation with the third country concerned. Any measures imposed by the Union should be commensurate with the injury caused by the third countries’ measures of economic coercion. The criteria for defining the Union response measures should take into account in particular the need to avoid or minimise collateral effects, administrative burdens and costs imposed on Union economic operators as well as the Union’s interesto safeguard the integrity and proper functioning of the internal market to prevent any disruption in supply chains. Therefore, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives pursued, in accordance with Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should examine whether third-country measures are coercive, on its own initiative, upon request of the European Parliament, upon request by a Member State, or following information received from any source, including legal and natural persons or a Member State. Following this examination, the Commission should determine in a decision whether the third-country measure is coercive. The Commission should communicate any affirmative determination to the third country concerned, together with a request that the economic coercion cease and a request, where appropriate, that any injury be repaired. The Commission should keep the European Parliament and Council regularly informed of ongoing developments about a third country measure under examination, as well as the actions it intends to take in this framework.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 51 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) After the adoption of Union response measures, the Commission should continuously assess the situation in relation to the third-country measures of economic coercion, the effectiveness of the Union response measures and their effects, with a view to adjusting, suspending or terminating the response measures accordingly. It is therefore necessary to set out the rules and procedures for amending, suspending and terminating Union response measures and the situations in which these are appropriate. The Commission should regularly report to the European Parliament and Council about the recent developments, the outcome of the review process on how effective the countermeasures are, as well as about the next steps it intends to take.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules and procedures in order to ensure the effective protection of the interests of the Union and its Member States, to safeguard the integrity and proper functioning of the internal market, as well as to preserve EU capacity to make sovereign choices and adopt public policies, where a third country seeks, through measures affecting trade or investment, to coerce the Union or a Member State into adopting or refraining from adopting a particular act. This Regulation provides a framework for the Union to respond in such situations with the objective to deter, or have the third country desist from such actions, whilst permitting the Union, in the last resort, to counteract such actions.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In determining whether the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met, the following shallfurther elements may be taken into account, such as:
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Upon request of the Parliament, the Commission shall examine any measure of a third country in order to determine whether it meets the conditions set out in Article 2(1). The Commission shall act expeditiously and report to the Parliament about the outcome of its investigation and the next steps it intends to adopt.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall carry out the examination referred to in paragraph 1 on its own initiative or following information received from any source. The Commission shall ensure the protection of confidential information in line with Article 12, which may include the identity of the supplier of the information.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Commission shall regularly update the European Parliament and Council about any ongoing examination of a measure taken by a third country and recent developments linked to it.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall keep the European Parliament and the Council informed of relevant developments and of the next steps to be taken.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) action is necessary to protect the interests and rights of the Union and its Member States or to prevent any disruption in the internal market in that particular case, and
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission shall select and design an appropriate response measure taking into account the determination made pursuant to Article 4, the criteria set out in Article 2(2) and the Union’s interest, on the basis of available information, including as collected pursuant to Article 11, and the following criteria:
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The Commission shall regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council about the effectiveness of the Union response measures and, where relevant, consult them about the actions it intends to take, including suspension and termination.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where the third country concerned suspends the economic coercion, or where it is necessary in the Union’s interest, the Commission may suspend the application of the respective Union response measure for the duration of the third country’s suspension, or as long as necessary in light of the Union’s interest. The Commission shall suspend the Union response measures if the third country concerned has offered, and the Union has concluded, an agreement to submit the matter to binding international third-party adjudication and the third country is also suspending its measures of economic coercion. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, decide to suspend the Union response measure. These implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) where it is appropriate in light of the Union’s interest.deleted
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Before the adoption of Union response measures or the amendment of such measures, the Commission shall, and before the suspension or termination of such measures, respectively, the Commission may, seek information and views regarding the economic impact on Union operators and Union's interest, through a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union or through other suitable public communication means. The notice shall indicate the period within which the input is to be submitted.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) the Union’s interest.deleted
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2021/0406(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) the exclusion from public procurement of goods, services, works or suppliers of goods or, services or works of the third country concerned or the exclusion of tenders the total value of which is made up of more than a specified percentage of goods or services of the third country concerned; and/or
2022/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Whilst always acting within the framework of international law, it is essential that the Union possess an appropriate instrument to deter and counteract economic coercion by third countries in order to safeguard its rights and interests and those of its Member States. This is particularly the case where third countries take, fail to take or threaten to take measures affecting trade or investment that interfere in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act, policy or stance by the Union or a Member State. Such measures affecting trade or investment may include not only actions taken on, and having effects within, the territory of the third country, but also actions taken by the third country, including through entities controlled or directed by the third country and present in the Union, that cause harm to economic activities in the Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) This Regulation aims to ensure an effective, efficient and swift Union response to economic coercion, includingespecially deterrence of economic coercion of the Union or a Member State and, in the last resortf necessary because other instruments cannot protect the Union interest adequately, countermeasures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In accordance with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary and appropriate, for creating an effective and comprehensive framework for Union action against economic coercion, to lay down rules on the examination, determination and counteraction with regard to third countries’ measures of economic coercion. In particular, the Union’s response measures should be preceded by an examination of the facts, a determination of the existence of economic coercion, and, wherever possible and when the third country shows willingness to engage in good faith, efforts to find a solution in cooperation with the third country concerned. Any measures imposed by the Union should be commensurate with the injury caused by the third countries’ measures of economic coercion. The criteria for defining the Union response measures should take into account in particular t and aimed at obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion or the reparation for the injury caused. The criteria for defining the Union response measures should take into account in particular the effectiveness of the measures in inducing the cessation of the economic coercion and the potential of the measures to provide relief to the economic operators within the Union affected by the economic coercion. The need to avoid or minimise collateral effects, administrative burdens and costs imposed on Union economic operators as well as the Union’s interest may also be taken into account. Therefore, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives pursued, in accordance with Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Any action undertaken by the Union on the basis of this Regulation should comply with the Union’s obligations under international law. International law allows, under certain conditions, such as proportionality and prior notice, the imposition of countermeasures, that is to say of measures that would otherwise be contrary to the international obligations of an injured party vis-à-vis the country responsible for a breach of international law, and that are aimed at obtaining the cessation of the breach or reparation for it.10 Accordingly, response measures adopted under this Regulation should take the form of either measures adhering to the Union’s international obligations or measures constituting permitted countermeasures. Under international law, and in accordance with the principle of proportionality, they should not exceedbe equivalent to a level that is commensurate with the injury suffered by the Union or a Member State due to the third country’s measures of economic coercion, taking into account the gravity of the third country’s measures and the Union’s rights and interests in question. In this respect, injury to the Union or a Member State is understood under international law to include injury to Union economic operators. _________________ 10 See Articles 22 and 49-53 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, adopted by the United Nations’ International Law Commission at its fifty-third session, in 2001, and taken note of by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution 56/83.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Coercion is prohibited under international law when a country deploys measures such as trade or investment restrictions in order to obtain from another country an action or inaction which that country is not internationally obliged to perform and which falls within its sovereignty, when the coercion reaches a certain qualitative or quantitative threshold, depending on both the ends pursued and the means deployed. The Commission should examine the third-country action on the basis ofmay take into account qualitative and quantitative criteria that help in determining whether the third country interferes in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State and whether its action constitutes economic coercion which requires a Union response.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should examine whether third-country measures are coercive, on its own initiative or following information received from any source, including legal and natural persons, the European Parliament or a Member State. Following this examination, the Commission should determine in a decision whether the third-country measure is coercive. The Commission should communicate any affirmative determination to the third country concerned, together with a request that the economic coercion cease and a request, where appropriate, that any injury be repaired.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The Union should support and cooperate with third countrielike-minded partners affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion or other interested third countriepartners. The Union should participate in international coordination in bilateral, plurilateral or multilateral fora that are geared towards the prevention or elimination of the economic coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2021/0402(COD)

(15) The Union should only impose countermeasures when other means such as negotiations, mediation or adjudication do not lead to the prompt and effective cessation of the economic coercion and to reparation of the injury it has caused to the Union or its Member States, and where action is necessary to protect the interests and rights of the Union and its Member States and it is in the Union’s interest. It is appropriate that the Regulation sets out the applicable rules and procedures for the imposition and application of Union response measures and permits expeditious action where necessary to preserve the effectiveness of any Union response measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Union response measures adopted in accordance with this Regulation should be selected and designed on the basis of objective criteria, including: the effectiveness of the measures in inducing the cessation of coercion by the third country; and their potential to provide relief to economic operators within the Union affected by the third-country measures of economic coercion;. The Commission may also consider other relevant factors such as the aim of avoiding or minimising negative economic and other effects on the Union;, and the avoidance of disproportionate administrative complexity and costs. It is also essential that the selection and design of Union response measures take account of the Union’s interestdministrative feasibility. Union response measures should be selected from a wide array of options in order to allow the adoption of the most suitable measures in any given case.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) In light of the evident increase in the use of economic leverages by foreign countries against the Union and the likely increase of the frequency and severity of these practices in the future, a Resilience Office should be established with a view to strengthening the preparedness for such instances, assessing Union’s weaknesses and assets, adopting the necessary coordinated measures and ultimately being able to react promptly when needed. Such an office would provide necessary support to the Union in order to be able to better anticipate and effectively react to emerging threats to economic security.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is important to ensure an effective communicationdialogue and exchange of views and information between the Commission on the one hand and the European Parliament and the Council on the other, in particular regarding ongoing examinations or third country measures, on efforts to engage with the third country concerned to explore options with a view to obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion and, on matters that may lead to the adoption of Union response measures under this Regulation and on the effectiveness on Union response measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules and procedures in order to ensure the effective protection of the interests of the Union and its Member States where a third country seeks, through measures affecting trade or investment or relevant threats thereof, to coerce the Union or a Member State into adopting or refraining from adopting a particular act, policy or stance. This Regulation provides a framework for the Union to respond in such situations with the objective to deter, or have the third country desist from such actionsand fully cease such actions, or repair the injury caused, whilst permitting the Union, in the last resort, to counteract such actions when necessary because other instruments cannot protect the Union interest adequately.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 112 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a Definitions (a) “Coercion” means any third country action or measure interfering in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act by the Union or a Member State; (b) “Third country action or measure” means any type of measure, form of action, failure to act or relevant threat thereof that is attributable to the relevant third country; (c) “Economic coercion” means coercion through a third–country action, or measure affecting trade or investment; (d) “Union response measure” means any measure adhering to the Union’s international obligations or permitted under international law vis-à-vis the third country responsible for economic coercion, which are commensurate with the injury suffered by the Union or a Member State and are aimed at obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion or the reparation for the injury caused; (e) “Union interest” means the need to preserve the policy space for the Union or its Member States to take legitimate sovereign choices of public policy.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
— interferes in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act, policy or stance by the Union or a Member State
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In determining whether the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met, the following shallmay inter alia be taken into account:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission may examine any measure of a third country or relevant threats thereof in order to determine whether it meets the conditions set out in Article 2(1). The Commission shall act expeditiouslywithin three months.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 137 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may carry out the examination referred to in paragraph 1 on its own initiative or following information received from any source, and including based on information and assessments provided by the Resilience Office referred to in Article 11a, or following information received from any source. The European Parliament and the Council may also provide information to the Commission. The Commission shall ensure the protection of confidential information in line with Article 12, which may include the identity of the supplier of the information. The Commission shall set up publicly available secure tools with a view to facilitating the submission of relevant information from external sources.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission mayshall notify the third country concerned of the initiation of the examination, as well as publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union or througabout the launch of ther suitable public communication means with an invitation to submit examination of third-country measures for a maximum duration of three months. In the same notice, the Commission may also provide an invitation, in particular to the third country concerned, to submit observations or information within a specified time limit. In that event, tThe Commission shall notify the third country concerned of the initiation of the examinationinform the European Parliament and the Council of the developments in ongoing examinations of third-country measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Following an examination carried out in accordance with Article 3, the Commission shall adopt a decision, within ten working days, determining whether the measure of the third country concerned meets the conditions set out in Article 2(1). The Commission shall act expeditiously.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 148 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Prior to adopting its decision, the Commission may invite the third country concerned to submit its observations.deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Where the Commission decides that the measure of the third country concerned meets the conditions set out in Article 2(1), it shall notify the third country concerned of its decision and request it to cease the economic coercion immediately and, where appropriate, repair the injury suffered by the Union or its Member States.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 153 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Following the notification referred to in Article 4, The Commission shall be open to engage on behalf of the Union with the third country concerned, to explore options with a view to obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion, and, where appropriate, reparation of the injury it has caused to the Union or its Member States. Such options may include:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
— direct negotiations if the country concerned agrees, within 10 working days, to engage in such negotiations;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
— mediation, conciliation or good offices to assist the Union and the third country concerned in these efforts under the conditions provided in Article 10(2);
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 158 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
— submitting the matter to international adjudication under the conditions provided in Article 10(2).
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 161 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Where appropriate, procedures shall deal with the matter within three months, which may be prolonged in duly justified cases and when required by a specific procedure.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 165 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall keep the European Parliament and the Council fully informed of relevant developments.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The Commission shallmay enter into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with any other countrylike-minded partners affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion or with any interested third countrypartners, with a view to obtaining the cessation of the coercion. This may involve, where appropriate,, as well as a long-term deterrence effect of anti-coercion instruments. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in sharing related information and experiences to facilitate a collective and coherent response to such coercive measures, and coordination in relevant international fora and coordination in response to the coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 171 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall adopt an implementing act determining that it shallwhereby it takes a Union response measure where:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 175 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) action pursuant to the Articles 4 and 5 has not resulted in the cessation of the economic coercion and reparation of the injury it has caused to the Union or a Member State within a reasonable period of time;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) action is in the Union’s interest.deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 179 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In the implementing act, the Commission shall also determine the appropriate Union response including from among the measures provided for in Annex I. Such measures may also apply with regard to natural or legal persons designated in accordance with Article 8. The Commission may also adopt measures which it can take pursuant to other legal instruments.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Union response measures shall apply from a specified date after the adoption of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall set this date of application, taking into account the circumstances, to allow for the notification of the third country concerned pursuant to paragraph 3 and for it to cease the economic coerc and in any case within 3 months from its adoption. If it is clear from lack of reactions to the notification referred to in Article 3(3) or from the engagement or lack thereof under Article 5 that the third country has no intention to cease the coercion, the implementing act shall apply 15 days after its adoption.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 189 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall, upon adoption of the implementing act, notify the third country concerned of the Union response measures adopted pursuant to paragraph 1. In the notification, the Commission shall, on behalf of the Union, call on the third country concerned to promptimmediately cease the economic coercion, offer to negotiate a solution including with regard to the reparation of the injury caused by the third country to the Union and its Member States, and inform the third country concerned that the Union response measure will applyies, unless the economic coercion ceases.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 193 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall state that the application of the Union response measures shall be deferred, but only for a period that is necessary for the Commission to verify the actual cessation of the coercion and to be specified in that implementing act, where the Commission has credible information that the third country has ceased the economic coercion before the start of application of the adopted Union response measures. In that event, the Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union indicating that there is such information and the date from which the deferral shall apply. If the third country ceases the economic coercion before the Union response measures start to apply, the Commission shall terminate the Union response measures in accordance with Article 10.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 196 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, the Union response measures may apply without the Commission, on behalf of the Union, first calling, once more, on the third country concerned to cease the economic coercion or without the Commission first notifying itThe Commission may exceptionally waive from the principle of notifying the third country concerned that Union response measure will apply, where this is necessary for the preservation of the rights and interests of the Union or Member States, notably of the effectiveness of Union response measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 199 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency to avoid irreparable damage to the Union or its Member States by the measures of economic coercion the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts imposing Union response measures, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(3). The requirements set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 shall apply. Those acts shall remain in force for a period not exceeding three months after which an implementing act pursuant paragraph 1 shall be adopted, if the conditions referred in that paragraph continue to apply.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 203 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 14 to amend the list provided for in Annex I in order to provide additional types of measures to respond to a third country’s measure. The Commission may adopt such delegated acts where the types of response measures would: (a) be as effective or more effective than the response measures already provided for in terms of inducing the cessation of measures of economic coercion; (b) provide as effective or more effective relief to economic operators within the Union affected by the measures of economic coercion; (c) avoid or minimise the negative impact on affected actors; or (d) avoid or minimise administrative complexity and costs.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 213 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Any Union response measure shall not exceed the level that is commensurate withbe commensurate to the level of the injury suffered by the Union or a Member State due to the third country’s measures of economic coercion, taking into account the gravity of the third country’s measures and the rights in questionand shall be effective in preserving the Union and its Member States’ rights in making legitimate sovereign choices with regard to particular acts, policies or stances.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 216 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission shall select and design an appropriate response measure taking into account the determination made pursuant to Article 4, the criteria set out in Article 2(2) and the Union’s interest, on the basis of available information, including as collected pursuant to Article 11, and the following criteria:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 219 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the avoidance or minimisation of negative impacts on affected actors by Union response measures, including the availability of alternatives for affected actors, for example alternative sources of supply for goods or services;deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 221 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the avoidance or minimisation of negative effects on other Union policies or objectives;deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 222 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the avoidance of disproportionate administrative complexity and costs in the application of the Union response measures;deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 223 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the existence and nature of any response measures enacted by other countries affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion, including where relevant any coordination pursuant to Article 6;deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 224 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) any other relevant criteria established in international law.deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 225 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. In applying the criteria under paragraph 2, points (a) and (b), the Commission may also consider other relevant factors such as: (a) the avoidance or minimisation of negative impacts on affected actors by Union response measures, including the availability of alternatives for affected actors, for example alternative sources of supply for goods or services; (b) the consistency with other Union policies or objectives; (c) the administrative feasibility of the application of the Union response measures; (d) consistency and coherence with any other response measures enacted by other countries affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion; (e) any other relevant criteria established in international law.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 227 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission may decide to apply Union response measures under Articles 7 or 8 consisting of restrictions on foreign direct investment or on trade in services also with regard to services supplied, or direct investments made, within the Union by one or more legal persons established in the Union and owned or controlled by persons of the third country concerned where necessary to achieve the objectives of this Regulation. The Commission mayshall decide on such application where Union response measures not covering such situations would be insufficient to effectively achieve the objectives of this Regulation, in particular where such measures could be avoided. In assessing whether to adopt such a decision the Commission shall consider, in addition to the criteria in paragraphs 1 and 2, amongst other things:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 232 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where the third country concerned entirely suspends the economic coercion, or where it is necessary in the Union’s interest, the Commission mayshall suspend the application of the respective Union response measure for the duration of the third country’s suspension, or as long as necessary in light of the Union’s interest. The Commission shall suspend the Union response measures if the third country concerned has offered, and the Union has concluded, an agreement to submit the matter to binding international third-party adjudication as referred to in Article 5 and the third country ihas also suspendingdiscontinued its measures of economic coercion and commits to support and abide by the third- party adjudication. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, decide to suspend the Union response measure. These implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 234 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Where it is necessary to make adjustments to Union response measures taking into account the conditions and criteria laid down in Articles 2 and 9(2), or further developments, including the third country’s reaction, the Commission mayshall, as appropriate, swiftly amend Union response measures adopted in accordance with Article 7, by means of an implementing act, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 237 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) where a binding decision in international third-party adjudication in a dispute between the third country concerned and the Union or a Member State requires the withdrawal of the Union response measure, provided that the third country has taken part to the third-party adjudication procedure in good faith as referred to in Art. 10.2;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 238 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) where it is appropriate in light of the Union’s interest.deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 243 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Before the adoption of Union response measures orand within the framendment of such measures, the Commission shall, and before the suspension or termination of such mework of the examination, the determination with regard to third country measures and the engagement with the third country and within the respective timelines asu res,ferred to respectively in Articles 3,4 and 5, the Commission may,shall seek information and views as necessary regarding the economic impact on Union operators and Union's interest, through a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union or through other suitable public communication means. The notice shall indicate the period within which the input is to be submitted. The Commission shall also seek information and views in the case of amendments of Union measures. The Commission may seek information and views before the suspension or termination of Union measures. The Resilience Office referred to in Article 11a shall conduct permanent impact analyses, including on the basis of consultation of Union operators and EU social partners, of possible patterns of Union response measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 244 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may start the information gathering at any time it deems appropriate, including before the formal activation of the examination of a third country measure as referred to in Article 3.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 245 #

2021/0402(COD)

3. In conducting the information gathering under paragraph 1, the Commission shall inform and consult stakeholders, in particular industry associations and EU social partners, affected by possible Union response measures, and Member States involved in the preparation or implementation of legislation regulating the affected fields.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 246 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Without unduly delaying the adoption of Union response measures, tThe Commission shall, in particular, seek information on:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 247 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the administrative burden which may be occasioned by sucheffect of such measures on diminishing the negative impacts of the third country’s coercive measures;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 249 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) the Union’s interest.deleted
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 253 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. Prior to the adoption of an implementing act in accordance with Article 7(6) or Article 10(5), the Commission shall seek information and views from relevant stakeholders in a targeted mannerThe Commission shall seek information and views from relevant stakeholders in a targeted manner as a general principle prior to the adoption of an implementing act in accordance with Article 7(6) or Article 10(5), unless the imperative grounds of urgency are such that information seeking and consultations are not possible or not needed for objective reasons, for instance to ensure compliance with international obligations of the Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 255 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a Resilience Office A Resilience Office within the European Commission is hereby established. It represents the Commission’s services that are relevant for the implementation of this Regulation and of other tools related to anti-coercion and extra-territorial sanction policies. For the purposes of this Regulation, the Resilience Office shall: (a) gather information and provide cost and data analyses with a view to determining the nature of economic coercion measures; (b) provide, in full compliance with the principle of confidentiality, the main contact point for EU businesses and private sector stakeholders affected by economic coercion measures, including with regard to assistance to be provided in the context of ongoing economic coercion, as well as after the coercion is terminated; (c) assess the Union’s strategic vulnerabilities with the objective of strengthening the preparedness of the Union in case of third countries’ coercive measures and threats thereof.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 256 #

2021/0402(COD)

Article 11 b In order to enhance the dialogue between the institutions of the Union, in particular the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and to ensure greater transparency and accountability, the European Parliament shall invite the Commission and, where appropriate, the Council, to appear before the competent committee to discuss in particular ongoing examinations under Article 3, ongoing engagement with a third country under Article 5, cooperation with third countries under Article 6, the effectiveness of the Union response measures.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 257 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 2 shall not preclude the Commission to disclose general information in a summary but meaningful form, which does not contain information allowing to identify the supplier of the information. Such disclosure shall take into account the legitimate interest of the parties concerned in not having confidential information disclosed.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 259 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
16 Reporting and review
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 260 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall evaluate any Union response measure adopted pursuant to Article 7 six months after its termination, taking into account stakeholder input, information provided by the European Parliament and the Council, and any other relevant information. The Commission shall publish yearly an evaluation report shallwhere it examines the effectiveness and operation of the Union response measure, and draw possible conclusions for future measures. The Commission shall present such report to the European Parliament and the Council.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 264 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. No later than three years after the adoption of the first implementing act under this Regulation or sixfour years after the entry into force of this Regulation, whichever is earlier, and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall review this Regulation and its implementation and shall report to the European Parliament and the Council.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 274 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) Withholding of EU funding to partner countries through financing managed by the EIB, EBRD or other institutions and other programmes managed by the EU;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 275 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l b (new)
(lb) Restrictions on authorisations for banking, insurance and other activities (licence); financial transactions, financial services;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 276 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l c (new)
(lc) Restriction of access to EU capital markets;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 277 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l d (new)
(ld) Restrictions on registrations and authorisations under the REACH Regulation and the hazardous chemicals legislation or similar actions;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 278 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l e (new)
(le) Listing of companies that would then be subject to other restrictions as referred to in this Annex;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 279 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l f (new)
(lf) Restriction of access to EU research programmes or exclusion from EU research programmes;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 280 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point l g (new)
(lg) Visa measures, such as suspending the issuing of multi-entry visas and suspending optional fee waivers among others.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2021/0366(COD)

(22) Another important action announced in the Communication is the establishment of the EU Observatory on deforestation, forest degradation, changes in the world’s forest cover and associated drivers (“EU Observatory”) launched by the Commission in order to better monitor changes in the world’s forest cover and related drivers. Moreover, building on already existing monitoring tools, including Copernicus products, the EU Observatory will facilitate access to information on supply chains for public entities, consumers and business, providing easy-to-understand data and information linking deforestation, forest degradation, and changes in the world’s forest cover to EU demand/trade for commodities and products. The EU Observatory will thus directly support the implementation of this Regulation by providing scientific evidence in regard to global deforestation and forest degradation and related trade. The EU should also examine how to integrate land rights monitoring into the EU Observatory. The EU Observatory will cooperate closely with relevant international organisations, research institutes, non-governmental organisations and third countries.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Obligations concerning relevant commodities and products should be laid down by this Regulation in order to effectively combat deforestation, forest and conversion of natural ecosystems, forest and ecosystems degradation, and to promote deforestation- free supply chains as well as ensure the protection of human rights recognised under international law, in particular under treaties and other instruments ratified or endorsed by the country of production.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) To strengthen the Union’s contribution to halting deforestation and forest, conversion of natural ecosystems and forest and ecosystems degradation, and to ensure that commodities and products from supply chains related to deforestation and forest, conversion of natural ecosystems and forest and ecosystems degradation are not placed on the Union market, relevant commodities and products should not be placed or made available on the Union market, nor exported from the Union market unless they are deforestation-free and have been produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production and comply with international standards in the field of human rights to prevent any violation of those. To confirm that this is the case, they should always be accompanied by a due diligence statement.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) On the basis of a systemic approach, operators should take the appropriate steps in order to ascertain that the relevant commodities and products that they intend to place on the Union market comply with the deforestation-free and legality requirements of this Regulation. To that end, operators should establish and implement due diligence procedures. The due diligence procedure required by this Regulation should include three elements: information requirements, risk assessment and risk mitigation measures. The due diligence procedures should be designed to provide access to information about the sources and suppliers of the commodities and products being placed on the Union market, including information demonstrating that the absence of deforestation and forest, conversion of natural ecosystems and forest and ecosystems degradation and legality requirements are fulfilled, inter alia by identifying the country and area of production, including geo-location coordinates of relevant plots of land. These geo-location coordinates that rely on timing, positioning and/or Earth observation could make use of space data and services delivered under the Union’s Space programme (EGNOS/Galileo and Copernicus). On the basis of this information, operators should carry out a risk assessment. Where a risk is identified, operators should mitigate such risk to achieve no or negligible risk. Only after completing the required steps of the due diligence procedure and concluding that no or negligible risk exists that the relevant commodity or product is not compliant with this Regulation, should the operator be allowed to place the relevant commodity or product on the Union market or to export it.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) For this reason, the Commission should assess the deforestation and forest degradation risk at a level of a country or parts thereof based on a range of criteria that reflect both quantitative, objective and internationally recognised data, and indications that the countries are actively engaged in fighting deforestation and forest degradation. This benchmarking information should make it easier for operators in the Union to exercise due diligence and for competent authorities to monitor and enforce compliance, while also providing an incentive for producer countries to increase the sustainability of their agricultural production systems and reduce their deforestation impact. This should help making supply chains more transparent and sustainable. This benchmarking system should be based on a threewo-tier classification of countries to be regarded as low, standard or high risk. In order to ensure appropriate transparency and clarity, the Commission should in particular make publicly available the data being used for benchmarking, the reasons for the proposed change of classification and the reply of the country concerned. For relevant commodities and products from low risk countries or parts of countries identified as low-risk, operators should be allowed to apply a simplified due diligence, whilst competent authorities should be required to apply enhanced scrutiny on relevant commodities and products from high risk countries or parts of countries identified as high-risk. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing measures to establish the countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities and products that are not compliant with this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) While tThis Regulation addresses deforestation and forest degradation, as envisaged in the 2019 Communication ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests, protecting forests should not lead toas well as the conversion or degradation of other natural ecosystems. Ecosystems such as wetlands, savannahs and peatlands are highly significant to global efforts to combat climate change, as well as other sustainable development goals and their conversion or degradation require particular urgent attention. To address this, the Commission should assess the need and feasibility of extending the scope to other ecosystems and to further commodities two years after the entry into force. At the same time, the Commission should also undertake a review of the relevant products as listed in Annex I of this Regulation by way of a delegated act.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 134 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 lays down Union procedures for the implementation of a FLEGT licensing scheme through bilateral Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) with timber-producing countries. To respect bilateral commitments that the European Union has entered into and to preserve the progress achieved with partner countries that have an operating system in place (FLEGT licensing stage), this Regulation should include a provision declaring wood and wood-based products covered by a valid FLEGT license as fulfilling the legality requirement under this Regulation. This Regulation should lay down the steps required for wood and wood-based products covered by a valid FLEGT licenses to fulfil the deforestation-free requirement. The Regulation should foresee specific technical and financial support to VPA partner countries that are willing to revise their Timber Legality Assurance Systems which verify that wood and wood-based products conform to national laws and provide the basis for FLEGT licensing to ensure the required sustainability criteria are met.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 138 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) While tThis Regulation addresses deforestation and forest degradation, as envisaged in the 2019 Communication ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests, protecting forests should not lead toas well as the conversion or degradation of other natural ecosystems. Ecosystems such as wetlands, savannahs and peatlands are highly significant to global efforts to combat climate change, as well as other sustainable development goals and their conversion or degradation require particular urgent attention. An evaluation of the need and the feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to other ecosystems than forests should therefore be undertaken within 2 years of the entry into force of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation lays down rules regarding the placing and making available on the Union market, as well as the export from the Union market, of cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, soya and woodommodities listed in Annex I (“relevant commodities”) and products, as listed in Annex I, that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities or products deriving from them (“relevant products”), with a view to
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 151 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a This Regulation also lays out obligations for financial institutions operating in the Union that provide financial services to natural or legal persons whose economic activities consist, or are linked to, the production, supply, placing on or export from the EU market of relevant commodities and products.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘deforestation’ means the conversion of forest to another land use, including agricultural use, whether human- induced or not; This definition also applies to the conversion of forests that are not plantation forests into plantation forests;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) “ecosystem conversion” means the change of a natural ecosystem to another land use or change in a natural ecosystem’s species composition, structure, or function. This includes severe degradation or the introduction of management practices that result in a substantial and sustained change in the ecosystem’s species composition, structure, or function.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5a) “natural ecosystem” means an ecosystem that substantially resembles — in terms of species composition, structure, and ecological function— one that is or would be found in a given area in the absence of major human impacts. These include, in particular, land with high carbon stocks and land with a high biodiversity value such as savannahs, grasslands, peatlands and wetlands, such as mangroves. This definition applies to human-managed ecosystems where much of the natural species composition, structure, and ecological function are present.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 166 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘forest degradation’ means charvesting operations that are not sustainable and cause a reduction or loss of the biological or economic productivity and complexity of forest ecosystems, resulting in the long-term reduction of the overall supply of benefits from forest, which includes wood, biodiversity and other products or servicesnges within a forest that negatively affect its species composition, structure, and/or function and reduce the forest’s capacity to support biodiversity and/or deliver ecosystem services, whether human induced or not;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 172 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘sustainable harvesting operations’ means harvesting that is carried out considering maintenance of soil quality and biodiversity with the aim of minimising negative impacts, in a way that avoids harvesting of stumps and roots, degradation of primary forests or their conversion into plantation forests, and harvesting on vulnerable soils; minimises large clear-cuts and ensures locally appropriate thresholds for deadwood extraction and requirements to use logging systems that minimise impacts on soil quality, including soil compaction, and on biodiversity features and habitats;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 173 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
(8) ‘deforestation, conversion and degradation-free’ means
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 174 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) that the relevant commodities and products, including those used for or contained in relevant products, were produced on land that has not been subject to deforestation or ecosystem conversion after December 31, 20208, and
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
(b) that the woodrelevant commodities hasve been harvested from the forest without inducing forestproduced without inducing or contributing to forest or ecosystem degradation after December 31, 20208;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘negligible risk’ means the level of risk that applies to relevant commodities and products to be placed on, or exported from, the Union market when, following a full assessment of both the product-specific and the general information on compliance with Articles 3(a) and 3(b) and the application of appropriate mitigation measures, by relevant commodities or products showing no cause for concern;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 186 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) ‘non-compliant products’ means relevant commodities and products that were not produced in a ‘deforestation, conversion and degradation-free’ manner, or were not produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production, or both;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 188 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) ‘substantiated concern' means well- foundeda claim based on objective and verifiable information regarding non- compliance with the present Regulation and which may require the intervention of competent authorities;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 189 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
(28) ‘relevant legislation of the country of production’ means the rules applicable in the country of production concerning the legal status of the area of production in terms of land use rights, environmental protection, third parties’ rights and relevant trade and customs regulations under legislation framework applicable in the country of production;aw’ means
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 191 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 – point i (new)
i) the rules applicable in the country of production concerning the legal status of the area of production, land use rights, environmental protection, third parties’ rights, labour rights and relevant tax, anti-corruption, trade and customs regulations under legal framework applicable in the country of production;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 192 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 – point ii (new)
ii) Human rights protected under international law, in particular under any treaties and other instruments ratified or endorsed by the country of production. These include instruments protecting: customary tenure rights and the right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), as set out among others by the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and UN and regional treaty bodies, the right to water, the right to environmental protection and sustainable development, the right to defend human rights and the environment, free from any form of persecution and harassment, labour rights as enshrined in ILO fundamental conventions and other internationally recognised human rights related to land use, access or ownership, as well as the human right to a healthy environment, as defined in the Framework Principles on Human Rights and the Environment and the standards and good practices identified by the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment. Where national laws fall short of international standards, operators must ensure that the above-mentioned rights are complied with;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 193 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
(28a) ‘free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)’ means a collective human right of indigenous peoples and local communities to give and withhold their consent prior to the commencement of any activity that may affect their rights, land, resources, territories, livelihoods, and food security. It is a right exercised through representatives of their own choosing and in a manner consistent with their own customs, values, and norms;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 b (new)
(28b) ‘Human rights defenders’ means individuals, groups and organs of society that promote and protect universally recognised human rights and fundamental freedoms. Human rights defenders seek the promotion and protection of civil and political rights as well as the promotion, protection and realisation of economic, social and cultural rights. Human rights defenders also promote and protect the rights of members of groups such as indigenous communities.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 195 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 c (new)
(28c) ‘Environmental human rights defenders’ means individuals and groups who, in their personal or professional capacity and in a peaceful manner, strive to protect and promote human rights relating to the environment, including water, air, land, flora and fauna.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 196 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 d (new)
(28d) 'financial institution’ means: (a) a credit institution as defined in point (1) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; (b) an insurance undertaking authorised in accordance with Article 18 of Directive 2009/138/EC; (c) an institution for occupational retirement provision authorised or registered in accordance with Article 9 of Directive(EU) 2016/2341 except an institution in respect of which a Member State has chosen to apply Article 5 of that Directive or an institution that operates pension schemes which together have less than 15 members in total; (d) a manufacturer of a pension product as referred to in point (e) of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 or an individual pension product as referred to in point (g) of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014; or (e) an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM)as defined in point (b) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2011/61/EU; (f) a pan-European personal pension product (PEPP)provider as referred to in point (2) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1238; (g) a manager of a qualifying venture capital fund registered in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 345/2013; (h) a manager of a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund registered in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation(EU) No 346/2013; (i) a management company of an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS management company) as defined in point (b) of Article 2(1) of Directive 2009/65/EU; (j) an investment firm as defined in point (1) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU; or (k) branches, when located in the Union, of financial institutions as referred to in points (a) to (j), whether their head office is situated in a Member State or in a third country;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 197 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 e (new)
(28e) ‘financial service’ means: (a) lending including, inter alia: credit agreements relating to immovable property, factoring, with or without recourse, financing of commercial transactions (including forfeiting), export credit; (b) financial leasing; (c) payment services as defined in Article 4(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC; (d) guarantees and commitments; (e) participation in securities issues and the provision of services relating to such issues; (f) money broking; (g) non-life insurance services as set out in Annex I of Directive2009/138/EC; or(h) portfolio management and advice;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 198 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) they are deforestation, conversion and degradation-free;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 200 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) they have been produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of productionaw, as defined in Article 2(28); and
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 205 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. Operators that have received new information, including substantiated concerns, that indicates a non-negligible risk that the relevant commodity or product that they have already placed on the market is not in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation shall immediately inform the competent authorities of the Member States in which they placed the relevant commodity or product on the market as well as traders to whom they have supplied the relevant commodity or product in view of preventing further circulation on, or export from, the internal market. In the case of exports from the Union market, the operators shall inform the competent authority of Member State which is the country of production.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 207 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Traders which are SMEmicro- enterprises may only make available on the market relevant commodities and products if they are in possession of the information required under paragraph 2.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 212 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Traders which are SMEmicro- enterprises shall collect and keep the following information relating to the relevant commodities and products they intend to make available on the market:
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 214 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Traders which are SMEmicro- enterprises shall keep the information referred to in this Article for at least 5 years and shall provide that information to the competent authorities upon request.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 216 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Traders which are SMEmicro- enterprises that have received new information, including substantiated concerns, that indicates a non-negligible risk that the relevant commodity or product that they have already made available on the market is not in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation shall immediately inform the competent authorities of the Member States in which they made available the relevant commodity or product on the market.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 218 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. Traders which are not SMEmicro- enterprises shall be considered operators and be subject to obligations and provisions in Articles 3, 4, 5, 8 to 12, 14(9), 15 and 20 of this Regulation with regard to the relevant commodities and products that they make available in the Union market.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 224 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) description, including the trade name and type of relevant commodities and products as well as, where applicable, the common name of the species and its full scientific name; for relevant products, the description shall include mention of the relevant commodities, or products derived from them, that are contained as components or ingredients, used as feed or used in the production process;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 227 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) name, email and address of any business or person from whom they have been supplied with the relevant commodities or products and all other suppliers included upstream in the supply chain;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 229 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) adequate and verifiable information that the production has been conducted in accordance with relevant international law and relevant legislation of the country of production, including any arrangement conferring the right to use the respective area for the purposes of the production of the relevant commodity;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 234 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the assignment of high risk to the relevant country or parts thereof in accordance with Article 27;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 235 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the presence of forests or of other natural ecosystems in the country and area of production of the relevant commodity or product;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 236 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) the existence of claims to or disputes regarding the use of, ownership of, or exercise of customary tenure rights on the area used for the purpose of producing the relevant commodities and products, whether formally registered or not;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 237 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) the presence of indigenous peoples, local communities and other customary tenure rights holders in the country and area of production of the relevant commodity or products
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 238 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) prevalence of deforestation or forest, natural ecosystem conversion or forest and ecosystem degradation in the country, region and area of production of the relevant commodity or product;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 240 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) concerns in relation to the country or part thereof of production and origin, such as level of corruption, prevalence of document and data falsification, lack of law enforcement, violation of rights of or violence against Indigenous Peoples, local communities or other customary tenure rights holders, as well as human rights defenders, armed conflict or presence of sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council or the Council of the European Union;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 242 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the risk of mixing with products of unknown origin or produced in areas where deforestation or forest degradation, ecosystem conversion or forest and ecosystem degradation as well as violations of the relevant law has occurred or is occurring;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 247 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Wood products which are in scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 that are covered by a valid FLEGT license from an operational licensing scheme shall be deemed to be in compliance with Article 3(bthe rules applicable in the country of production, as defined in article 2 (28)(a) of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 248 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Operators shall meaningfully engage with relevant stakeholder groups, including Indigenous Peoples, local communities and other customary tenure right holders, throughout the risk assessment and risk mitigation process. They shall engage with these stakeholders prior to taking any decisions that may impact them
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 252 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Undertakings shall ensure that their purchase policies do not cause or contribute to deforestation, forest or ecosystem conversion or degradation
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 256 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
1. When placing relevant commodities or products on the Union market or exporting them from it, operators are not required to fulfil the obligations under Article 10 where they can ascertain that all relevant commodities and products have been produced in countries or parts thereof that were identified as low risk in accordance with Article 27. 2. However, if the operator obtains or is made aware of any information that would point to a risk that the relevant commodities and products may not fulfil the requirements of this Regulation, all obligations of Article 9 and 10 have to be fulfilled.Article 12 deleted Simplified due diligence
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 259 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12 a Obligations of financial institutions 1. Financial institutions shall provide financial services to customers only when they conclude that there is no more than a negligible risk that the services in question may provide support, directly or indirectly, to activities leading to, or linked with, deforestation, ecosystems conversion, forests and ecosystems degradation or that are taking place in violation of relevant legislation/law; 2. In view of complying with paragraph 1, financial institutions, shall exercise due diligence, as described in paragraph 3, as soon as they establish a business relationship with, and prior to providing financial services to customers; 3. The due diligence shall include: (a) the collection of information and documents, as referred to in Article 12b needed to fulfil the requirement set out in paragraph 1; (b) Risk assessment and mitigation measures as described in Article 12c; 4. For customers with whom they have established an ongoing business relationship before the date of entry into force of this regulation, financial institutions shall complete the relevant due diligence within one year from the date in question;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 261 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 b (new)
Article 12 b Collection of information and documents for financial institutions 1. Financial institutions shall collect the information, documents and data demonstrating that the provision of financial services to customers complies with Article 12a (1). These shall include, at least: a. description of the customer’s economic activities and of the activities of entities controlled by, controlling of otherwise linked to the customer; b. description of the economic activities of the customers’ suppliers and of the suppliers of the other entities listed under paragraph (a) c. when the customer is an operator or trader for the purpose of this regulation, information on the relevant commodities and products placed on, made available on or exported from the Union’s market and on the related exercise of due diligence under this Regulation; d. use, for the activities under (a) and (b) of relevant commodities and products, including information on the relevant commodities and products effectively used and on the related exercise of due diligence under this Regulation; e. policies adopted, and implemented by, the customer and by the entities and suppliers referred to under (a) and (b) in view of ensuring that their activities do not cause deforestation, ecosystems conversion, forests and ecosystems degradation or human rights’ violations; f. independent audits on the effectiveness of the due diligence and policies mentioned under (c), (d) and (e) 2. Financial institutions shall make available to the competent authorities upon request the information, documents and data collected under this article. 3. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 33 to supplement paragraph 1 concerning further relevant information, document, and date to be obtained and evidence to be provided that may be necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the due diligence system.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 262 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 c (new)
Article 12 c Risk assessment and mitigation measures for financial institutions 1. Financial institutions shall verify and analyse information collected in accordance with Article 12b and any other relevant documentation, and on this basis carry out a risk assessment to establish whether there is a risk that the provision of financial services to a customer may not comply with Paragraph 12a(1). If the financial institutions cannot demonstrate that the risk of non- compliance is negligible, they shall not provide financial services to the customer at issue. 2. The risk assessment shall take account, in particular, of the following risk assessment criteria: a. Whether the customer’s economic activities and the activities of entities controlled by, controlling or otherwise linked to the customer, consist in, or are linked to, the production, or supply of relevant commodities and products; b. Whether the customer is an operator or trader for the purpose of this Regulation; c. Whether, in the case under (a), the customer has in place policies referred to in Article 12 a (1),which are regularly subject to appropriate maintenance and independent audit; d. Whether, in the case under (b), above, operators have and use an adequate due diligence system, compliant with the requirements set out in this Regulation and subject to appropriate maintenance and independent audit; e. Whether the country of production, or parts thereof, of relevant commodities and products is identified as high-risk pursuant to Article 27; f. Whether the customer, or entities controlled by, controlling or otherwise linked to the customer have been subject to penalties for the infringement of provisions of this Regulation; g. Whether the customer, or entities controlled by, controlling or otherwise linked to the customer are the object of claims linked to the violation of this Regulation or for damages that have occurred as a result of deforestation, ecosystems conversion, forests and ecosystems degradation or human rights’ violations. h. Whether there are substantiated concerns that the provision of financial services to a customer may not comply with Article 12a (1) 3. Except where the analysis undertaken in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 allows the financial institution to ascertain that there is no or negligible risk that the provision of financial services to a customer may not comply with Article 12a(1), the financial institution shall adopt mitigation procedures and measures that are adequate to reach no or negligible risk. This may include requiring additional information, data or documents, undertaking independent surveys or audits or other measures pertaining to information requirements set out in Article 12(b)1. 4. Financial institutions shall be able to demonstrate how the information gathered was checked against the risk assessment criteria set out in paragraph 2, how a decision on risk mitigation measures was taken and how the financial institutions determined the degree of risk. 5. Financial institutions shall have in place adequate and proportionate policies, controls, and procedures to mitigate and manage effectively the risks of non- compliance of financial services that are covered by this regulation. These shall include: a. model risk management practices, reporting, record-keeping, internal control and compliance management, including the appointment of a compliance officer at management level; b. an independent audit function to check the internal policies, controls and procedures referred to in point (a). 6. The risk assessments shall be documented, reviewed at least on an annual basis, and made available to the competent authorities upon request. 7. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 33 to supplement paragraphs 2, 3 and 5 as regards relevant information to be obtained, risk assessment criteria and risk mitigation measures that may be necessary to supplement those referred to in this Article to ensure the effectiveness of the due diligence system. 8. The Commission shall, in consultation with Member States and the OECD, and with the assistance of the Fundamental Rights Agency, the European Environment Agency and the European Agency for Small and Medium Enterprises, publish guidelines for financial institutions to facilitate compliance with the due diligence obligation set out in this regulation. In preparing the non-binding guidelines referred to in this paragraph, due consideration shall be taken of relevant international standards.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 263 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 d (new)
Article 12 d Due diligence guidelines In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with stakeholders, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, may issue guidelines; when developing those guidelines due account shall be taken i.a. of the UN Guiding Principes on Business and Human Rights and the OECD-FAO Guidance for Responsible Agricultural Supply Chains.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 264 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 e (new)
Article 12 e Relation with other Due diligence requirements Due diligence obligations under this Regulation shall apply independently and without prejudice to any other Union due diligence or sustainability obligations. This regulation shall not modify requirements stemming from other Union sustainability or due diligence legislation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 266 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. To carry out the checks referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities shall establish a plan based on a risk-based approach. The plan shall contain at least risk criteria to carry out the risk analysis under paragraph 4 and thereby inform the decisions on checks. In establishing and reviewing the risk criteria, the competent authorities shall take into account in particular the assignment of risk to countries or parts thereof in accordance with Article 27, the history of complianceprevious failures of an operator or trader with this Regulation and any other relevant information. Based on the results of the checks andto ensure compliance with this Regulation, the quantity of relevant commodities and products being placed or made available on the market by the operator or trader, the experience on implementation of the plans, theod of time since the risk assessment for the relevant commodities or products was completent authorities shall review those plans and risk criteria on a regular basis in order to improve their effectiveness. When reviewing the plans, the competent authorities shall establish a reduced frequency of checks for those operators and traders who have shown a consistent record of full compliance with the requirements under this Regulationd, the proximity of the plots of land on which the relevant commodities and products were produced to forests and other natural ecosystems and any other relevant information. Based on the results of the checks and the experience on implementation of the plans, the competent authorities shall review those plans and risk criteria on a regular basis in order to improve their effectiveness.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 268 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. For cases where the relevant commodity or product comes from an area identified as high risk pursuant to Article 27 of this Regulation, the competent authority shall suspend placing on the market and proceed to further checks within 4 working days in order to verify that the relevant commodity or product complies with the requirements set under this Regulation;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 270 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 9
9. Each Member State shall ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 510% of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities on their market as well as 510% of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities placed or made available on or exported from their market.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 272 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 11
11. Without prejudice to the checks under paragraphs 5 and 6, competent authorities shall, without undue delay, conduct checks referred to in paragraph 1 when they are in possession of evidence or other relevant information, including based on substantiated concerns provided by third parties under Article 29, concerning potential non-compliance with this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 274 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Records of checks carried out under this regulation and reports of their results and outcomes shall constitute environmental information for the purpose of Directive 2003/4/EC.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 277 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 1
and, where appropriadelete,d
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 281 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a Checks on financial institutions 1. Competent authorities shall, with the assistance of the authorities referred to in Article 7 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 conduct checks on financial institutions to establish whether they comply with their obligations under this Regulation and whether the financial services they provide to customers are compliant with the requirements of this Regulation. The provisions on checks laid out in Articles14 and 15 of this Regulation shall apply, with the necessary adjustments, to the checks performed in accordance with this article. 2. Financial institutions shall cooperate with competent authorities to facilitate the performance of checks including by disclosing all the information that is relevant to demonstrate compliance with Articles 12a, 12b and 12c.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 284 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. Competent authorities shall immediately alert competent authorities of other Member States and the Commission when they detect an actual or potential infringement of this Regulation and serious shortcomings that may affect more than one Member State. Competent authorities shall, in particular, inform competent authorities of other Member States when they detect a relevant commodity or product on the market that is, or may be, not compliant with this Regulation, to enable the withdrawal or recall of such commodity or product from sales in all Member States or to support enforcement action by these competent authorities.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 286 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall make available to the public and the Commission, at the latest by 30 April of each year, information on the application of this Regulation during the previous calendar year. This information shall include their plans for checks and the risk criteria on which they are based, the number and the results of the controlhecks carried out on operators and traders, including the contents of these checkresults of these checks, the number and the results of the controls carried out on relevant commodities and products including the results of these controls, the volume of relevant commodities and products checked in relation to the total quantity of relevant commodities and products placed on the market, the countries of origin and of production of relevant commodities and products as well as the measures taken in case of non-compliance and the costs of controls recoveredoperators and traders against whom such measures were taken as well as the trading name of the non-compliant products, the costs of enforcement activities recovered in each instance, and operators and traders who failed to fulfil their obligations under this regulation and against whom an administrative authority or court has imposed penalties in line with Article 23 which are final within the preceding four years, including the trading name of the relevant non-compliant products..
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 288 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In addition to the reporting requirement under paragraph 2, the Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union a list of operators and traders having failed to fulfil their obligations under this Regulation and the trading name of the relevant non-compliant products, comprised of the operators, traders and non-compliant products included in the lists published by Member States under paragraph 1, regularly updated. For that purpose, Member States shall notify the Commission without undue delay about any final administrative or criminal sanction or penalty imposed on operators or traders for infringing their obligations under this regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 289 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 to 3, Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the public can enjoy unrestricted access to information relating to the application of this regulation on the basis of Directive 2003/4/EC and Regulation (EC) 1367/2006.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 290 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where relevant commodities or products were produced in a country or part thereof listed as high risk in accordance with Article 27, or there is a risk of relevant commodities or products produced in such countries or parts thereof entering the relevant supply chain, each Member State shall ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 1530% of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities and products on their market as well as 1530% of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities and products placed or made available on or exported from their market from high risk countries or parts thereof. Competent authorities shall ensure that the annual checks carried out on the basis of this article regularly include all of the elements listed in Article 15.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 291 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Where, on the basis of the examination of evidence or other relevant information, including based on information exchanged under Article 18 and substantiated concerns provided by third parties under Article 29, or following the checks referred to in Article 15 and 16, possible serious shortcomingsinfringements of this regulation have been detected, or risks have been identified pursuant to Article 14(6), the competent authorities may take immediate interim measures, including seizure or suspension of the placing or making available on and exporting from the Union market of the relevant commodities and products.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 292 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice toIn addition to the imposition of penalties in line with Article 23, where competent authorities establish that an operator or trader has not complied with its obligations under this Regulation or that a relevant commodity or product is not compliant with this Regulation, they shall without delay require the relevant operator or trader to take appropriate and proportionate corrective action to bring the non-compliance to an end within a specified and reasonable period of time.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 296 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) addressing any shortcoming in the due diligence system which may have led to the non compliance, in view of preventing the risk of further infringements
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 297 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. If the operator or trader fails to takcomplete the corrective action referred to in paragraph 2 within the period of time specified by the competent authority under paragraph 1, or where the non- compliance referred to in paragraph 1 persists after that period of time ends, competent authorities shall ensure that the relevant commodity or product is withdrawn or recalled, or that its being made available on or exported from the Union market is prohibited or restricted.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 299 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) fines proportionate to the environmental damage and the value of the relevant commodities or products concerned, calculating the level of such fines in such way as to make sure that they effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and gradually increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements; the maximum amount of such fines shall be at least 4 % of the operators or trader’s annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concernedUnion, calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) 139/2004;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 300 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) in case of serious or repeated infringement, suspension of the right to submit a due diligence statement in view of placing relevant commodities and products on the Union market, or of exporting them.;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 301 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) recall of relevant commodities or products offered for sale including at retailers;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 302 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new)
(dc) criminal sanctions, in accordance with the (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directive 2008/99/EC)
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 304 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23 a 1. Without prejudice to other applicable EU and national instruments, Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation by financial institutions and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Member States shall notify the Commission of those provisions and without delay of any subsequent amendments affecting them. 2. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Penalties shall include as a minimum: (a) a public statement which identifies the natural or legal person and the nature of the breach; (b) an order requiring the natural or legal person to cease the conduct and to desist from repetition of that conduct; (c) fines proportionate to the environmental damage and the value of the financial services provided, calculating the level of such fines in such way as to make sure that they effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and gradually increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements; the maximum amount of such fines shall be at least 4 % of the financial institution’s annual turnover in the Union; (d) confiscation of the sums provided to the customers in the performance of the financial services provided to them in breach of this Regulation; (e) confiscation of revenues gained by the financial institutions from the provision to the customer of financial services in breach of this Regulation; (f) temporary exclusion from public procurement processes; (g) in case of serious or repeated infringement, where a financial institution is subject to an authorisation, withdrawal or suspension of the authorisation; (h) a temporary ban against any person discharging managerial responsibilities in a financial institution, or any other natural person, held responsible for the breach, from exercising managerial functions in financial institutions; 3. Member States may empower competent authorities to impose additional types of administrative sanctions in addition to those referred to in points (a) to (h) of paragraph 2.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 309 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall develop an electronic interface based on the EU Single Window Environment for Customs to enable the transmission of data, in particular the notifications and requests referred to in Article 24, paragraphs 5 to 8, between national customs systems and the information system referred to in Article 31. This electronic interface shall be in place at the latest fourno later than 1 years from the date of adoption of the relevant implementing act referred to in paragraph 3.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 310 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission mayshall develop an electronic interface based on the EU Single Window Environment for Customs to enable:
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 313 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a threewo- tier system for the assessment of countries or parts thereof. Unless identified in accordance with this Article as presenting a low or high risk, countries shall be considered as presenting a standard risk. The Commission may identify countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities or products that are not compliant with Article 3, point (a). The list of the countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk shall be published by means of implementing act(s) to be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 34(2). That list shall be updated as necessary in light of new evidence.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 314 #

2021/0366(COD)

2. The identification of low and high risk countries or parts thereof pursuant to paragraph 1 shall follow a transparent assessment process which shall take into account information provided by the country concerned and by third parties, including indigenous peoples, local communities and civil society organisations and be based on the following assessment criteria:
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 315 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) rate of deforestation and forestecosystem conversion and forest and ecosystems degradation,
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 317 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) production transformation, and import trends of relevant commodities and products,
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 318 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) whether the nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change covers emissions and removals from agriculture, forestry and land use which ensures that emissions from deforestation and forest degradation are accounted towards the country's commitment to reduce or limit greenhouse gas emissions as specified in the NDC;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 320 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) agreements and other instruments concluded between the country concerned and the Union that address deforestation or forest degradation and facilitates compliance of relevant commodities and products with the requirements of this Regulation and their effective implementationprovided that their timely and effective implementation has been ascertained on the basis of an objective and transparent assessment;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 322 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) the existence of public mapping of all existing concessions and the possibility for these to be linked with ownership data
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 323 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) whether the country concerned has national or subnational laws in place, including in accordance with Article 5 of the Paris Agreement, and takes effective enforcement measures to avoid and sanction activities leading to deforestation and forest conversion and forest and ecosystem degradation, and in particular whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive of the benefits accruing from deforestation or forest degradation are applied. forest conversion or forest and ecosystem degradation or non-compliance with the rules applicable in the country of production described in Article 2(28) are applied.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 326 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) existence, compliance with, and effective enforcement of laws protecting the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities and other customary tenure rights holders;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 328 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point f b (new)
(fb) the level of implementation and enforcement of the rules applicable in the country of production described in Article 2(28), including clarity and consistency of the legal framework, and transparency and monitoring of its implementation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 331 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission shall notify the countries concerned of its intent to assign a change to the existing risk category and invite them to provide any information deemed useful in this regard. It shall also carry out a public consultation to gather information and views from all interested parties, including in particular Indigenous Peoples, local communities small holders, women and civil society organisations. The Commission shall allow the countries and other interested parties adequate time to provide a response, which may include information on measures taken by the country to remedy the situation in case its status or the status of parts thereof might be changed to a higher risk category.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 332 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
It shall include in the notification, and in the consultation, the following information:
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 334 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the consequences of its identification as a high or low risk country.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 337 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall engage with producer countries concerned by this Regulation to develop partnerships and cooperation to jointly address deforestation and forest, including countries exporting significant volumes of commodities listed in Annex I, to develop partnerships and cooperation to jointly address the root causes of deforestation, ecosystems conversion and forest and ecosystem degradation. Such partnerships and cooperation mechanisms wishall be supported by adequate resources and shall focus on the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of forests, deforestation, forest degradationecosystem conversion, forest and ecosystem degradation, human rigths protection, and the transition to sustainable commodity production, consumption processing and trade methods, good governance as well as protecting the lives and livelihoods of forest dependent communities including indigenous peoples, local communities, other customary tenure right holders and smallholders. Partnerships and cooperation mechanisms may include structured dialogues, support programmes and actions, administrative arrangements and provisions in existing agreements or agreements that enable producer countries to make the transition to an agricultural production that facilitates the compliance of relevant commodities and products with the requirements of this regulation. Such agreements and their effective implementation will be taken into account as part of the benchmarking under Article 27 of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 340 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Partnerships and cooperation should allow the full participation of all stakeholders, including civil society, indigenous peoples, local communities, women and the private sector including, SMEs and smallholders.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 344 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Partnerships and cooperation shall promote the development of integrated land use planning processes, relevant legislations, including multi stakeholder processes to define the scope of relevant legislation, fiscal incentives and other pertinent tools to improve forest and biodiversity conservation, sustainable management and restoration of forests, tackle the conversion of forests and vulnerable ecosystems to other land uses, optimise gains for the landscape, tenure security, agriculture productivity and competitiveness, transparent supply chains, protect the rights of ownership, tenure and access to land, including rights of tree tenure for local and indigenous communities, and the right to give or withhold free, prior and informed consent, strengthen the rights of forest dependent communities including smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities, strengthen national systems of governance and law enforcement, and ensure public access to forest management documents and other relevant information.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 345 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall engage in international bilateral and multilateral discussion on policies and actions to halt deforestation and forest degradation, including in multilateral fora such as Convention on Biological Diversity, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, United Nations Environment Assembly, United Nations Forum on Forests, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, World Trade Organisation, G7 and G20. Such engagement shall include the promotion of the transition to sustainable agricultural production and sustainable forest management as well as the development of transparent and sustainable supply chains as well as continue efforts towards identifying and agreeing robust standards and definitions that ensure a high level of protection of forest ecosystemand other natural ecosystems and related human rights.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 348 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall ensure that there are sufficient resources to support smallholders in third countries to comply with the requirements of this Regulation and facilitate their access to the EU market.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 351 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities shall diligently and impartially assess the substantiated concerns and take the necessary steps, including checks and hearings of operators and traders, with a view to detecting potential breaches of the provisions of this Regulation and, where circumstances indicate a breach has likely occurred, appropriate, interim measures under Article 21 to prevent the placing making available on and export from the Union market of relevant commodities and products under investigation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 352 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. The competent authority shall, as soon as possiblewithin 30 days of receiving a substantiated concern, and in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, inform the natural or legal persons referred to in paragraph 1, which submitted observations to the authority, of its assessment of their substantiated concern pursuant to paragraph 2, and the decision to accede to or refuse the request for action and shall provide the reasons for it and shall, where further action is taken pursuant to paragraph 2, inform the natural or legal person of the further action taken and the outcome within 60 days of receiving the substantiated concern.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 353 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29 a Natural or legal persons’ substantiated concerns in relation to the provision of financial services 1. Natural or legal persons shall be entitled to submit substantiated concerns to competent authorities when they deem, based on objective circumstances, that one or more financial institutions are failing to comply with the provisions of this Regulation. 2. The competent authority shall, in with the assistance of the authorities referred to in Article 7 of Directive (EU) 2015/849, diligently and impartially assess the substantiated concerns and take the necessary steps, including checks and hearings of the financial institutions and of the operators and traders concerned, with a view to detecting potential breaches of the provisions of this Regulation. 3. The terms and procedure set out in Article 29 (3) shall apply.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 355 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Any such procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive as well as provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief where appropriate.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 356 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Member States shall ensure that practical information is made available to the public on access to administrative and judicial review procedures.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 360 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. No later than two years after the entry into force, the Commission shall carry out a first review of this Regulation, and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The report shall focus in particular on an evaluation of the need and the feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to other ecosystems, including land with high carbon stocks and land with a high biodiversity value such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands and further commoditieadditional measures to strengthen the protection of forests , natural ecosystems, and human rights.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 363 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. No later than five years after the entry into force and at least every five years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out a general review of this Regulation, and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The first of the reports shall include in particular, based on specific studies, an evaluation of:
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 366 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the need for and feasibility of additional trade facilitation tools to support the achievement of the objectives of the Regulation including through recognition of certification schemes;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 368 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the impact of the Regulation on farmers, in particular smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities and the possible need for additional support for the transition to sustainable supply chains.deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 370 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall permanently monitor the impacts of this regulation on vulnerable stakeholders such as smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities, especially in third countries, also paying particular regard to the situation of women. The monitoring shall be based on a scientific and transparent methodology and shall take into account information provided by the interested stakeholders. No later than three years from the date of application referred to in Article 36(2), the Commission shall propose measures, taking into account the outcomes of the monitoring process aiming at supporting these stakeholders, in particular to: a) Ensure that their production methods and scale are able to comply with the sustainability criteria set out in the regulation, and that their commodities and products are traceable and their origin transparent; b) Promote, when necessary, their transition towards, and the maintaining of, socially and environmentally sustainable agricultural practices which do not make them exclusively dependent on commodity production for export but support a transition focused on agro- ecology; c) Facilitate and support their inclusion in supply chains leading to the EU internal market by creating conditions and incentives that enable them to comply with the EU regulatory requirements; d) Provide support and incentives for them to conserve their forests and natural ecosystems on their lands that are used for commodity production; e) Guarantee that, in any case, the rights of Indigenous Peoples and other local communities with tenure rights are adequately protected.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 371 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Without prejudice to the general review under paragraph 1, a first review of Annex I shall be carried out by the Commission no later than two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and thereafter at regular intervals in order to assess whether it is appropriate to amend or extend the relevant productcommodities listed in Annex I in order to ensure that all products that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities are included in that list, unless the demand for those products has a negligible effect on deforeste broadest application to commodities linked to deforestation, ecosystem conversion and forest and ecosystem degradation. The reviews shall be based on an assessment of the effect of the relevant commodities and products on deforestation and forest, ecosystem conversion and forest and ecosystem degradation, and take into account changes in consumption, as indicated by scientific evidence.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 373 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. Following a review as set out in paragraph 3, the Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 33 to amend Annex I to include relevant products that contain or have been made usingadditional relevant commodities.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 375 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State and the public, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) One of the objectives of Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council11 is to guarantee the proper functioning of the internal market. Pursuant to Article 3(3), point (a), of that Directive, one of the essential requirements that radio equipment must fulfil is that it interoperates with accessories, in particular with common chargers. In that respect, recital (12) of Directive 2014/53/EU indicates that the interoperability between radio equipment and accessories such as chargers simplifies the use of radio equipment and reduces unnecessary waste and costs and that developing a common charger for certain categories or classes of radio equipment is necessary, particularly for the benefit of consumers. This is also in line with the goals of the European Green Deal and should therefore be achieved. __________________ 11 Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 62 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Since 2009, efforts have been deployed at Union level to limit the fragmentation of the charging interfaces for mobile phones and similar items of radio equipment. Recent voluntary initiatives do not fully meet Union policy objectives to reduce electronic waste (e-wasNevertheless, the single market is not exploiting its full potential and the continuing fragmentation of the market for chargers and charging interfaces for mobile phones and other categories or classes of radio equipment translates into an increase in electronic waste (e-waste) and consumer frustration. Recent voluntary initiatives have proved unsuccessful to meet Union policy objectives to reduce e-waste, ensure consumer convenience and avoid fragmentation of the market for charging devices. To date), ensure consumer convenience and avoid fragmentation of the market for charging devicethere are no voluntary commitments or binding requirements on common chargers or charging interfaces for mobile phones or other similar portable devices. A comprehensive approach at Union level is needed to address the risks related to the continued market fragmentation, to minimise the environmental impact of portable product chargers and to empower consumers by providing them with a sustainable choice when buying such products.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In January 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on a common charger for mobile radio equipment stressing the urgent need for Union regulatory action for a common charger for mobile phones and other small and medium-sized radio equipment devices in order to reduce e-waste, empower consumers to make sustainable choices, and allow consumers to participate fully in an efficient and well- functioning internal market. The resolution also highlights the importance of research and innovation in this domain to improve existing technologies and come up with new ones and the need for a regular scrutiny of the legislative framework for a common charger in order to take into account technical progress.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The Union is committed to boosting the efficient use of resources and to reduce the environmental and resource footprint of Union production and consumption by moving to a clean, circular economy through the introduction of initiatives such as Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council12 and more recently through the introduction of the European Green Deal. This Directive aims to reduce the e-waste generated by the sale of radio equipment and to reduce the extraction of raw materials and the CO2 emissions generated by the production, transportation and disposal of chargers, thereby promoting a circular economy. __________________ 12 Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (OJ L 197, 24.7.2012, p. 38).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The Commission’s Circular Economy Action Plan provided for initiatives along the entire life cycle of products, targeting their design, promoting circular economy processes through resource efficiency, zero pollution and waste prevention as key priorities, fostering sustainable consumption, and aiming to ensure that the resources used are kept in the Union economy for as long as possible.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The Commission completed an impact assessment study, which has shownconfirmed that the internal market is not exploiting its full potential as continuing fragmentation of the market for charging interfaces and charging communication protocols for mobile phones and other similar radio equipment results in a lack of consumer convenience and an increase in e-waste.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 74 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The interoperability between radio equipment and accessories such as chargers is hampered as there are different charging interfaces for certain categories or classes of radio equipment that use wired charging such as handheld mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones or headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakers. In addition, there are several types of fast charging communication protocols for which a minimum level of performance is not always guaranteed. As a result, Union action is required to promote a common degree of interoperability, minimum power delivery, a common fast charging functionality and the provision of information relating to the charging characteristics of radio equipment to end- users so that they are adequately informed about the negative impact of unnecessary chargers. It is therefore necessary to introduce suitable requirements in Directive 2014/53/EU regarding the charging communication protocols, the charging interface (i.e. charging receptacle) of certain categories or classes of radio equipment operating with power delivery up to 100 Watts, as well as the information to be provided to end-users regarding the charging characteristics of those categories or classes of radio equipment, such as information about the minimum and maximum wattage range at the maximum charging speed, so that end-users can easily understand which chargers they can use with which radio equipment device.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) It is therefore necessary to harmonise the charging interface and charging communication protocols for specific categories or classes of radio equipment that are recharged via wired charging. It is also necessary to provide the basis for adaption, review and modification of the current rules to any future technological progress by introducing a harmonisation ofand to other developments that may have an impact on consumer convenience, environmental benefits and to the degree of fragmentation of the charging interfaces and charging communication protocols. It is also necessary to harmonise the charging interfaces and the charging communication protocols with respect to radio equipment that may be charged via any means other than wired charging including charging via radio waves (wireless charging) by 31 December 2025. Such harmonisation should reduce environmental waste, ensure consumer convenience and avoidensure that the wireless charging technology or any other technology that uses other means than wired charging is at least equally energy efficient and safe as a wired solution and that it is interoperable and capable of quickly charging different categories or classes of radio equipment. Such a harmonised approach would help reducing environmental waste, ensure consumer convenience and avoid lock-in effects with proprietary charging solutions as well as fragmentation of the market among different charging interfaces and charging communication protocols as well as among any initiatives at national level, which might cause barriers to trade in the internal market.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Such harmonisation would be however incomplete, if it is not combined with requirements regarding the combined sale of radio equipment and their chargers and information to be provided to end-userscharging devices and cables are systematically sold to end- users with each electronic device. The most effective way to ensure a concrete reduction in environmental impacts and an actual increase in consumer savings is to establish that radio equipment should only be sold to end-users without charging devices and cables. Such measure should be combined with mandatory information to be provided to end-users before the sale of the product, including when the product is sold online. The mandatory unbundling should not be financially detrimental to end-users, and any discriminatory, disproportionate or unfair marketing practice resulting in unnecessary costs and burden for end- users should be monitored and reported by the Commission. A fragmentation of approaches among the Member States with respect to the marketing of the categories or classes of radio equipment concerned and their charging devices would hamper the cross-border trade in those products, for example by obliging economic operators to repackage their products depending on the Member State, in which the products are to be supplied. This would in turn result in increased inconvenience for consumers and would generate unnecessary e-waste thus offsetting the benefits derived from the harmonisation of the charging interface and charging communication protocol. It is therefore necessary to impose requirements to ensure that end-users are not obliged to purchase a new charging device with each purchase of a new mobile phone or similar item of radio equipment. To ensure the effectiveness of suchTo ensure the effectiveness of the unbundling requirements, end-users should receive the necessary information regarding the charging characteristics when purchasing a mobile phone or similar item of radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) With respect to charging by means other thanThe latest technological trends reflect the shift from wired charging to charging by other means, such as different wireless charging technologies, which entail many potential benefits for consumers and the environment such as mitigating e-waste, but also shortcomings, because wireless charging technologies perform less efficiently than wired charging. It should be considered that no standardised test method exists to evaluate and effectively compare the efficiency of wireless charging. Many mobile phones and other categories or classes of radio equipment already use different wiredless charging, methods, and divergent solutions may be developed in the future, which may have negative impacts on interoperability, consumer convenience and the environment. Whilst it is premature to impose specific requirements on such solutions at this stage, the Commission should be able to tait is necessary to avoid any future fragmentation in this area or risk of lock-in effect with proprietary charging solutions for wireless charging technologies, which may jeopardise the goals of the common charger initiative. To this end, harmonised standards to evaluate and effectively compare the efficiency of different wireless charging technologies and to harmonise charging interfaces and fast charging protocols for wireless charging are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market action towards harmonising them in the future, if fragmentation on the internal market is observednd the application of this Directive. The Commission should therefore take measures towards harmonising such wireless technologies based on voluntary harmonised standards that are adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the purpose of drawing up detailed technical specifications for improving the energy efficiency and the interoperability of those technologies. The Commission should therefore issue standardisation requests to the European standardisation organisations by 2025.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In the absence of harmonised standards for interoperability of charging interface and fast charging protocols for wireless charging, and whenever needed for internal market harmonisation purposes, the Commission should be able to adopt the most appropriate technical specification, based on the degree of technical progress and on considerations of consumer convenience and environmental benefits. For instance, the Commission should be able to adopt technical specifications when the standardisation process is blocked due to a lack of consensus between stakeholders or where there are undue delays in the establishment of a harmonised standard, for example because the required quality is not reached. The Commission should not be allowed to adopt a technical specification if it has not previously tried to have the wireless requirements covered through the European standardisation system, except where the Commission can demonstrate that the technical specifications comply with the requirements laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. With a view to establishing such a standard in the most efficient way, the Commission should also fully involve the Commission Expert Group on Radio Equipment throughout the process of adaption and harmonisation.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 b (new)
(13b) In order to ensure coherence between the provisions of this Directive and other relevant provisions covering radio equipment, it is important to clarify that the provisions of this Directive apply to all end-users including consumers. The applicable definition of ‘end-user’ is laid down in Article 3(21) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and it explicitly indicates that consumers are a particular category of end-users.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Article 10(8) of Directive 2014/53/EU provides for information to be included in the instructions for use and so additional information requirements should be inserted in that Article. The details of the new requirements should be specified in the new annex to Directive 2014/53/EU. Those mandatory information requirements would enable consumers to determine the most appropriate external power supply (EPS) needed to charge their radio equipment. It should be possible to adapt those requirements in the future in order to reflect any changes to the labelling requirements for EPS, which may be introduced under Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 end-users to improve their understanding of the negative environmental impact of unnecessary chargers and of the differences between the available chargers on the market. An easily legible, accessible and understandable label should indicate the information on the charging capabilities and compatible chargers that should allow consumers to determine the most appropriate external power supply (EPS) needed to charge their radio equipment. The label with the information on the charging capabilities and compatible chargers should also be displayed on the instructions for use, which accompany the radio equipment, in order to give end-users a further reference. It should be possible to adapt those requirements in the future in order to reflect any changes to the labelling requirements for EPS, which may be introduced under Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 . The information obligations should be applicable to manufacturers, importers, distributors and where applicable, authorised representatives, as long as they supply the radio equipment directly to end-users, and should be adapted accordingly in the revision of the Union framework regulating the ecodesign requirements. __________________ 14 Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) Certain elements of the information referred to in Article 10(8) of Directive 2014/53/EU should also be provided by means of a dedicated graphic, the details of which should be specified in the annex to this Directive. The graphic should consist of visual elements that can easily enable end-users, including end- users with disabilities, to determine before the purchase of the product whether or not a charging device is included with the radio equipment and inform them about the minimum and the maximum power required to charge the radio equipment at the maximum charging speed. The graphic should be placed in a prominent position on the end-user packaging in order to be clearly visible to end-users before the purchase, including where the purchase is made online. In the absence of a packaging, the label should be attached on the radio equipment. The information obligations should be applicable to manufacturers, importers, distributors and where applicable, authorised representatives, as long as they supply the radio equipment directly to end-users, and should be adapted accordingly in the revision of the Union framework regulating the ecodesign requirements.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Articles 40, 43 and 44 of Directive 2014/53/EU should be amended in order to adapt the references that they contain to the new provisions that are introduced by this Directive. It is important to ensure that national market surveillance authorities have adequate human, financial and technical resources to effectively enforce the new requirements inserted in Articles 3 and 3a and Article 10(8) of Directive 2014/53/EU and to avoid divergent interpretations among market surveillance authorities. During the first five years following the date of application of this Directive, it is therefore essential that the Union finance market surveillance campaigns and associated activities relating to radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4), Article 3a and Article 10(8) of Directive 2014/53/EU. It is essential that Member States conduct market surveillance activities on the information obligations of economic operators, especially at the beginning of the applicability of the new rules. It is important that specific funding is provided for in relation to those activities, taking into account the fact that there are currently many unsafe chargers available on the market. Therefore, the carrying out of strong market surveillance activities about the safety of the chargers is of high importance.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In order to address any future developments in charging technology such as the emergence of new categories or classes of radio equipment, increase in voltage power or charging technologies and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and the charging devices for such radio equipment and harmonise wireless technologies, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to amend the categories or classes of radio equipment and the specifications regarding the charging interfaces and charging communication protocols, as well as the details on the information for each of them, as well as the additional and future details on the information, graphic and labelling requirements in relation to charging. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Inter- institutional Agreement on Better Law- Making of 13 April 201615 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 15 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 119 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
(aa) paragraph 3, second subparagraph, is replaced by the following: ‘The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 specifying which categories or classes of radio equipment are concerned by each of the requirements set out in points (a) to (i) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph. With respect to radio equipment referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 44, by 31 December 2027, with a view to ensuring its application by 1 January 2029, concerning the identification and the setting of harmonised standards and technical specifications, including references and descriptions, in relation to the charging receptacles and charging communication protocols, for rechargeable radio equipment, other than for the categories or classes of radio equipment, specified in Annex Ia, Part I in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging.´
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Radio equipment falling within the categories or classes specified in Annex Ia, Part I shall be so constructed that it complies with the specifications on charging capabilities set out in that Annex for the relevant category or class of radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
With respect to radio equipment referred to in Article 3(4) capable of being recharged via wired charging, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 to amend Part I of Annex Ia in the light of technical progress, consumer convenience, environmental benefits, degree of fragmentation of the charging interfaces and charging communication protocols and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and their charging devices, by:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) introducing, modifying, adding or removing categories or classes of radio equipment or power requirements;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) introducing, modifying, adding or removing technical specifications, including references and descriptions, in relation to the charging receptacle(s), power requirements and charging communication protocol(s), for each category or class of radio equipment concerned.’
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
With respect to radio equipment referred to in Article 3(4) capable of being recharged via means other than wired charging, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44, by 31 December 2025, in order to amend Part I of Annex Ia in the light of technical progress, consumer convenience, environmental benefits, degree of fragmentation of the market for charging interfaces and charging communication protocols, and to ensure the minimum common interoperability between radio equipment and their charging devices, by:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) introducing, modifying, adding or removing harmonised standards, technical specifications, including references and descriptions, in relation to charging interface(s) and charging communication protocol(s), for each category or class of radio equipment concerned.’;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The Commission shall, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, request one or more European standardisation organisations to draft harmonised standards for the categories of radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4). The Commission shall submit the first draft request to the relevant committee by 31 December 2025.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 b (new)
The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing technical specifications for the categories of radio equipment set out in Annex Ia to this Directive where the following conditions have been fulfilled: (a) no reference to harmonised standards is published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012; (b) the reference to harmonised standards is published in the Official Journal of the European Union, but the Commission determines, based on a technical assessment, that such standards do not result in consumer convenience, environmental benefits and reduced market fragmentation; and (c) either: (i) the Commission has requested one or more European standardisation organisations to draft a harmonised standard and there are undue delays in the standardisation procedure or the request has not been accepted by any European standardisation organisations; or (ii) the Commission can demonstrate that a technical specification complies with the requirements laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, except for the requirement that the technical specifications should have been developed by a non-profit making organisation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 45(3).
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 149 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall regularly review the requirements referred to in Article 3(4) and, where appropriate, amend the delegated acts and implementing acts adopted in accordance with this Regulation in line with technical progress, and duly taking into account consumer convenience, environmental benefits and the degree of fragmentation of the market for charging interfaces and charging communication protocols.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 3 a – paragraph 1
Where an economic operator offers to end- users the possibility to acquire radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4) together with a charging device, the end-user shall alsoonly be offered the possibility to acquire the radio equipment without any charging device or cable, and to purchase the charging device and cable separately.;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 8
(3) in Article 10(8), the following subparagraph iss are added:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
RManufacturers, importers, distributors and, where applicable, authorised representatives shall ensure that radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4) first subparagraph shall be accompanied by clear, understandable, accessible and accurate safety information and instructions, and by information on specifications relating to charging capabilities and to its charging device, as described in Annex Ia, Part II. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 in order to amend Annex Ia, Part II, by introducing, modifying, adding or removing any details in relation to that information or the way that such information shall be indicated.;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Manufacturers, importers, distributors and where applicable, authorised representatives shall ensure that radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4) are accompanied by an easily legible, accessible and understandable graphic indicating whether or not a charging device is offered together with the radio equipment in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex Ia, Part III. The graphic shall be placed in a prominent position on the end-user packaging in order to be clearly visible to end-users before the purchase, including where the purchase is made online. In the absence of a packaging, the label shall be attached to the radio equipment. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 in order to amend Annex Ia, Part III, by introducing, modifying, adding or removing any details to the graphic in relation to any future labelling requirements for external power supplies or charging cables or any relevant changes to Part I and II of that Annex.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 b (new)
Manufacturers, importers, distributors and, where applicable, authorised representatives shall ensure that radio equipment falling with the scope of Article 3(4) are accompanied by an easily legible, accessible and understandable label to provide information on the charging capabilities of the specific radio equipment as set out in Annex Ia, Part IV. The label shall be placed in a prominent position on the end-user packaging in order to be clearly visible to end-users before the purchase, including where the purchase is made online. In the absence of a packaging, the label shall be attached to the radio equipment. The label shall also be displayed on the instructions for use that accompany the radio equipment. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 44 in order to amend Annex Ia, Part IV, by introducing, modifying, adding or removing any details to the label in relation to any future labelling requirements for external power supplies or charging cables or any relevant changes to Parts I and II of that Annex, also taking into account the developments of the Union framework regulating the ecodesign requirements.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 165 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 40 – title
Procedure at national level for dealing with radio equipment presenting a risk or not in compliance with essential or information requirements;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 40 – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
(b) in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the words ‘or does not comply with at least one of the applicable essential requirements set out in Article 3 or Article 3a or with the information requirements set out in Article 10(8)’ are added after the words ‘public interest protection covered by this Directive’;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b a (new)
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 40 – paragraph 5– point b a (new)
(ba) in paragraph 5, the following point is added: ‘(ba) When carrying out market surveillance of radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3(4), the relevant market surveillance authorities shall perform specific checks about the economic operators’ obligations of information about the charging capabilities in Article 10(8) as well as checks about compliance with the applicable safety information and interoperability requirements, in line with Regulation 2019/1020´;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Directive 2014/53/EU
Article 47 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(7a) in Article 47, the following paragraph is added: '2a. The Commission shall monitor and review the application of this Directive in relation to new charging technologies and report thereon to the European Parliament and to the Council by 2025 and every three years thereafter. When carrying out the review, the Commission shall in particular evaluate the requirements set out in Article 3a and Article 10(8) and the progress on drawing up relevant European standards and technical specifications necessary to ensure that portable radio equipment interworks with wireless charging technologies. The Commission shall monitor any technological developments that can affect the specifications set out in Part I of Annex Ia, such as products covered, charging speed, power requirements, energy efficiency or emergence of new standards or technologies.’
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by [OP please insert date – 12 months after adoption6 months after the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from [OP please insert date 126 months after the end of the transposition period indicated in the preceding subparagraph].
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part I – paragraph –1 (new)
Categories or classes of radio equipment operating with power delivery of up to 100W falling under the scope of this Directive: – hand-held mobile phones, – tablets, e-readers, laptops, – digital cameras, – headphones, headsets, earbuds, – handheld videogame consoles, keyboards, mice, – portable speakers, smart speakers, digital radios, – smart watches, personal care devices, sport devices, – GPS/portable navigation, – electronic toys.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Hand-held mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakers,Categories or classes of portable radio equipment listed in point – 1 of this Annex in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging, shall:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part I – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Hand-held mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, handheld videogame consoles and portable speakers,Categories or classes of portable radio equipment listed in point – 1 of this Annex in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging at voltages higher thanof 5 volts or currents higher than 3 amperes or powers higher than 15 wattshigher or currents of 3 amperes or higher or powers of 15 watts or higher, shall:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 197 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part I – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) enable the charging of the radio equipment via USB Power Delivery regardless of the manufacturer of the charging device.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the case of radio equipment falling within the scope of Article 3 (4), first subparagraph, the following information shall be indicated in printed form on the packaging or, in the absence of packaging, on a label, including in the instructions and safety information, accompanying the radio equipment with the condition that the label can be visible:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a description of the power requirements of the wired charging devices that can be used with that radio equipment, including the minimum and the maximum power required to charge the radio equipment at the maximum charging speed expressed in watts by displaying the text: “the minimum power delivered by the charger shall be equal to or higher than [xx] Watts”. "The maximum power delivered at the maximum charging speed by the charger shall not be higher than [xx] Watts". The number of watts shouldall express the minimum and the maximum power required by the radio equipment at the maximum charging speed;
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 205 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a description of the specifications in relation to charging capabilities of the radio equipment, in so far as they are capable of being recharged via wired charging at voltages higher thanof 5 volts or currents higher than 3 amperes or powers higher than 15 wattshigher or currents of 3 amperes or higher or powers of 15 watts or higher, including an indication that the radio equipment supports the USB Power Delivery charging protocol by displaying the text “USB PD fast charging” and an indication of any other supported charging protocol by displaying its name in text format.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II – paragraph 2
Such information shall also be provided and displayed online in case of online sales and shall be in a language and a format which can be easily understood by consumers and other end-users, including persons with disabilities, as determined by the Member State concerned, and shall be clear, understandable and intelligible.’
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 210 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II a (new) – title
PART III Graphic indicating whether or not a charging device is offered together with the radio equipment
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II a – paragraph 1 (new)
1. Charging device (external power supply device) offered with radio equipment shall be indicated in the form of the following graphic:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 212 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II a – paragraph 2 (new)
2. Charging device (external power supply device) not offered with radio equipment shall be indicated in the form of the following graphic:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 213 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II a – paragraph 3 (new)
3. The label shall be of the same colour and size respecting the proportions given in the drawings above and shall appear in the instructions for use of the specific radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II b (new) – title
PART IV Content and format of the label providing information on the charging capabilities of the radio equipment
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 215 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II b (new) – paragraph 1
1. The Label shall be indicated in the following format:
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II b (new) – paragraph 2
2. The letters XX after “Minimum” shall be replaced by the figure corresponding to the minimum power required by the radio equipment to charge, which defines the minimum power that a charging device should supply to charge the radio equipment. The letters XX after “Maximum” shall be replaced by the figure corresponding to the maximum power required by the radio equipment at the maximum charging speed, which defines the power that a charging device should at least supply to achieve that maximum charging speed. The abbreviation "USB PD" (USB Power delivery) shall be displayed if the radio equipment supports this charging communication protocol. "USB PD" is a protocol that negotiates the fastest delivery of current from the charger to the device without shortening the battery lifetime. The power capabilities in the label should be established as key information requirements to ensure comparability between chargers. If deemed necessary, a figure could be provided in brackets indicating the current.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2021/0291(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I
Directive 2014/53/EU
Annex I a – Part II b (new) – paragraph 3
3. The label shall be of the same colour and size respecting the proportions given in the drawings above and shall appear in the instructions for use of the specific radio equipment.
2022/02/21
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 a (new)
(15 a) Offers for environmentally sustainable consumer loans are currently limited across the EU. In order to enable environmentally sustainable consumer spending such as the purchase of electric vehicles, or energy-efficient home renovations, in line with the EU Commission’s renewed Strategy on Sustainable Finance, creditors should be encouraged to offer as part of their portfolios affordable environmentally sustainable consumer credit products and develop corresponding policies. For this purpose, the European Banking Authority should, after consulting the Platform on Sustainable Finance, submit a report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission on environmentally sustainable consumer credit products, including a proposal for a standardisation of different types of environmentally sustainable consumer credit products. The Commission should take the report into account in its first evaluation of this Directive and, where appropriate, submit proposals to harmonise environmentally sustainable consumer lending practices and ensure ample availability and affordability of environmentally sustainable consumer credit products across the Union. Member States should set up qualitative and where relevant, quantitative targets to ensure the development of environmentally sustainable credit products.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) Specific provisions should be laid down on advertising of credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services and certain items of standard information to be provided to consumers in order to enable them, in particular, to compare different offers. Such information should be given in a clear, concise and prominent way by means of a representative example. The standard information should be shown upfront and saliently, in a clear way and in an engaging format. It should be clearly legible and adapted to take into account the technical constraints of certain media such as mobile telephone screens. Temporary promotional conditions, such as a teaser rate with lower interest rate for the initial months of the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services, should be clearly identified as such. Consumers should see all essential information at a glance, even when they watch it on the screen of a mobile telephone. The creditor and, where applicable, credit intermediary and provider of crowdfunding credit services’ telephone number and email address should also be communicated to the consumer to enable him or her to contact the creditor, the credit intermediary or provider of crowdfunding credit services quickly and efficiently. A ceiling should be provided where it is not possible to indicate the total amount of credit as the total sums made available, in particular where a credit agreement gives the consumer freedom of drawdown with a limitation with regard to the amount. The ceiling should indicate the upper limit of credit which can be made available to the consumer. In specific and justified cases, in order to improve consumer understanding of information disclosed in advertising of credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services where the medium used does not allow to visually display it, such as in radio advertising, the amount of information disclosed could be reduced. In addition, Member States should remain free to regulate information requirements in their national law regarding advertising of credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services which does not contain information on the cost of the credit. Advertising should not incite over- indebted consumers to seek credit, highlight the ease or speed with which credit can be obtained, state that a promotion is conditional upon taking up credit, nor specify that other credit contracts have no influence on the assessment of a credit application, and these practices should therefore be prohibited. Advertising should not use profiling and should not be personalised.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 181 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
(47) The assessment of creditworthiness should be based on information on the financial and economic situation, including income and expenses, of the consumer. The European Banking Authority Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring (EBA/GL/2020/06) provide guidelines on what categories of data may be used for the processing of personal data for creditworthiness purposes, which include evidence of income or other sources of repayment, information on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial commitments. Personal data, such as personal data found on social media platforms or health data, including cancer data, should not be used when conducting a creditworthiness assessment. Consumers should provide information about their financial and economic situation in order to facilitate the creditworthiness assessment. In principle, credit should only made available to the consumer where the result of the creditworthiness assessment indicates that the obligations resulting from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are likely to be met in the manner required under that agreement. However, should such assessment be negativeMember States may determine that in exceptional, and in specific and well justified circumstances, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services can exceptionally make credit available in specific and justified circumstances such as when they have a long-standing relationship with the consumer, or in case of loanseven when the assessment is negative for instance to fund exceptional healthcare expenses, or in case of students loans or loans for consumers with disabilities. In such cases, when deciding on whether or not to make the credit available to the consumer, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services should take into account the amount and the purpose of the credit, and the likelihood that the obligations resulting from the agreement will be met. The creditor’s decision and justification for granting the credit should be duly documented. Member States should ensure that in these exceptional cases consumers are equally protected from the risk of over-indebtedness and financial difficulties.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Articles 1, 2 and 3, Articles 5 to 10, Articles 12 to 23, Articles 26, 27 and 28, Articles 30 to 33, Article 37 and Articles 39 to 50 shall also apply to crowdfunding credit services where those services are not provided by a creditor or by a credit intermediary.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) credit agreements where the consumer is requested to deposit an item as security in the creditor's safe-keeping and the liability of the consumer is strictly limited to that deposited item;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 263 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, Member states may determine that this Directive applies to credit agreements involving a total amount of credit of more than EUR 100 000.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. In the case of credit agreements in the form of overrunning, only Articles 1, 2 and 3, Article 25, and Articles25, 35, 36, 39, and 41 to 50 shall apply.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 283 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ means all the costs, including interest, commissions, taxes and any other kind of fees which the consumer is required to pay in connection with the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services and which are known to the creditor, in the case of credit agreements, or to the crowdfunding credit services provider, in the case of crowdfunding credit services, except for notarial costs; costs in respect of ancillary services relating to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services are also included in the total cost of the credit to the consumer where, in addition, the conclusion of a contract regarding such ancillary services is compulsory in order to obtain the credit or to obtain it on the terms and conditions marketed, except for notarial costs; costs in respect of ancillary services relating to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services which are sold simultaneously are also included in the total cost of the credit to the consumer;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 294 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) ‘early repayment’ means the full or partial discharge of the consumer’s obligations under a credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services, before the date for the final payment agreed in the credit agreement;;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 297 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) ‘debt advisory services’ means personalised assistance of a technical, legal or psychological nature provided by independent professional operators which are not creditors, credit intermediaries, providers of crowdfunding credit services or credit servicers as defined in Article 3, point (8) of Directive (EU) 2021/2167 in favour of consumers who experience or might experience difficulties in meeting their financial commitments;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a Environmentally sustainable consumer credit products 1. Member States shall set up qualitative and where relevant, quantitative targets to support the development and the integrity of creditors’ environmentally sustainable lending activities. 2. Member States shall ensure that independent and impartial one-stop shop platforms are set up, available both physically and online, to provide independent technical advice, assistance and support to consumers on environmentally sustainable lending. Such platforms may be the same as those defined in the Article 21 of the Energy Efficiency Directive. 3. Creditors shall inform consumers about the existence of such platforms when presenting them with offers for environmentally sustainable credit products, before the conclusion of a credit agreement. 4. By 31 December 2023, EBA shall, after consulting the Platform on Sustainable Finance established under Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, submit a report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission on environmentally sustainable consumer credit products. That report shall, at least, consider: (a) the types of environmentally sustainable consumer credit products and the contractual conditions currently offered for sale across the EU; (b) the availability and affordability of these products in different member states; (c) the current use of such products in different member states; (d) a proposal for a standardisation of different types of environmentally sustainable consumer credit products.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 321 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Advertising concerning credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services shall not be targeted to a natural person or a group of persons based on their behaviour, the tracking of their activities, profiling within the meaning of Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU)2016/679. Only standardised offers may be advertised.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 325 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall require that advertising concerning credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services which indicates an interest rate or any figures relating to the cost of the credit to the consumer include standard information in accordance with this Article.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This obligation shall not apply where national law requires the indication of the annual percentage rate of charge in advertising concerning credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services which does not indicate an interest rate or any figures relating to any cost of credit to the consumer within the meaning of the first subparagraph.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 330 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where applicable, the borrowing rate, fixed or variable or both, together with particulars of any charges included in the total cost of the credit to the consumer;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) where applicable, the annual percentage rate of charge;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 333 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(f a) information regarding possible consequences of missed payments, including any interest or charges applicable for late payments
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f b (new)
(f b) a prominent, clearly visible warning to make consumers aware that borrowing costs money.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In all other cases, information listed in points (c), (f) and (h) shall be displayed prominently and in a bigger format than all other information. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act to define, and where necessary amend, regulatory technical standards to stipulating the format and presentation of the information contained in points (c), (f) and (h), in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. The European Banking Authority (EBA) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to stipulate the format and presentation of the information contained in points (c), (f) and (h).
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 339 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall prohibit advertising for consumer credit products which: (a) incites over-indebted consumers to seek credit; (b) highlights the ease or speed with which credit can be obtained; (c) states that a promotion is conditional upon taking up credit; (d) specifies that outstanding credit contracts have little or no influence on the assessment’ of a credit application; (e) suggests that success, social achievement or specific skills can be acquired thanks to credit agreements; (f) offer “grace periods” for the repayment of credit instalments of more than three months
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 370 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The pre-contractual information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be provided on paper or on another durable medium by means of the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form set out in Annex I. All the information provided in the form shall be equally prominent. The creditor shall be deemed to have fulfilled the information requirements in this paragraph and in Article 3, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Directive 2002/65/EC if he or she has supplied the Standard European Consumer Credit Information. In the process of providing pre-contractual information, special attention shall be given to the needs of persons with disabilities.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point n
(n) a warning regarding the consequencesand an explanation on the consequences, including the costs in the case of missing or late payments;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 403 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point p
(p) the existence of a right of withdrawal;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 421 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. At the same time as the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form is provided to the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services, shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form set out in Annex II, containing the following pre-contractual informationThe following pre-contractual information should be placed prominently at the beginning of the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 427 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the borrowing rate, or all borrowing rates if different borrowing rates apply in different circumstances; particularly highlighting the highest possible cost of the credit in the worst case for the consumer;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) costs a warning and explanations concerning the case of late paymenonsequences of missing or late payments including related costs;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point f a (new)
(f a) a comprehensive repayment schedule containing all payments and repayments over the lifetime of the contract, including those payments and repayments for any ancillary services relating to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services which are sold simultaneously, whereby payment and repayments, in case different borrowing rates apply in different circumstances, should be based on the worst possible scenario for the consumer;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 436 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point f b (new)
(f b) A note stating that, in accordance with Article 26, the consumer may withdraw from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services without giving any reason within a period of 14 calendar days.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 451 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Any additional information which the creditor may provide to the consumer shall be clearly legible and given in a separate document which may be annexed to the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form or the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form.;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 452 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The European Banking Authority (EBA) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards that specify the format and presentation of the information contained in points (c), (f) and (h). EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by XXX. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the third subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. The European Banking Authority (EBA) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to stipulate the format and presentation of the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and in the Standard Consumer Credit Overview form to be submitted to the Commission by XX and reviewed every two years thereafter. Powers should be delegated to the European Commission to adopt and, where necessary amend, regulatory technical standards to stipulate the format and presentation of the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and the Standard Consumer Credit Overview form in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 454 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. If the agreement has been concluded at the consumer's request using a means of distance communication which does not enable the information to be provided in accordance with this article, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form immediately after the conclusion of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 466 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. Upon request from the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services shall, in addition to the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form and the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form, provide the consumer free of charge with a copy of the draft credit agreement, or of the draft agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, provided that the creditor at the time of the request is willing to proceed to the conclusion of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services with the consumer.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 10
10. This Article shall not apply to suppliers of goods or services acting as credit intermediaries in an ancillary capacity. This is without prejudice to the creditor, or where applicable, credit intermediary or provider of crowdfunding credit services’ obligation to ensure that the consumer receives the pre-contractual information referred to in this Article.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 479 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. At the same time as the European Consumer Credit Information form is provided to the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary, shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form set out in Annex II.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 481 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Information displayed in the European Consumer Credit Information form and in the Standard Consumer Credit Overview form shall be consistent. It shall be clearly legible and take into account the technical constraints of the medium on which it is displayed. Information shall be displayed in an adequate and suitable way on the different channels.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 486 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. Upon request from the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary shall, in addition to the European Consumer Credit Information and the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form, provide the consumer free of charge with a copy of the draft credit agreement, provided that the creditor at the time of the request is willing to proceed to the conclusion of the credit agreement with the consumer.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 498 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may adapt the requirement referred to in paragraph 1 with regard to the manner in which the explanations shall be given and the extent to which they shall be given to the following: (a) the circumstances of the situation in which the credit is offered; (b) the person to whom the credit is offered; (c) the nature of the credit offered.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 500 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall require that creditors, credit intermediaries and providers of crowdfunding credit services inform consumers when they are presented with a personalised offer that is based on profiling or other types of automated processing of personal data. Such personalised offer shall not be based on personal data other than financially related data as defined in Article 18 paragraph 2.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 511 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 and without prejudice to the application of competition law, Member States may allow tying practices where the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services can demonstrate to the competent authority that the tied products or categories of product offered, on terms and conditions similar to each other, result in a clear benefit to the consumers taking due account of the availability and the prices of the relevant products offered on the market.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 519 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may allow creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services to require the consumer to hold a relevant insurance policy related to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services, taking into account proportionality considerations. In such cases, Member States shall ensure that the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services is required to accept the insurance policy from a supplier different to his or her preferred supplier where such insurance policy has a level of guarantee equivalent to the one the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services has proposed, without modifying the condition of the credit offering to the consumer. In addition, creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services should not be permitted to offer a relevant insurance policy related to the credit agreement of crowdfunding credit services before a 7-day cooling off period in order to ensure that the consumer is able to compare offers.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 530 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) act in the best interests of the consumer, with a view to minimising defaults and arrears;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 535 #

2021/0171(COD)

Point (b) of the second subparagraph shall apply only where the number of creditors considered is less than a majority of the market.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 557 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The assessment of creditworthiness shall be carried out on the basis of relevant and accurate information on the consumer’s income and expenses and other financial and economic circumstances which is necessary and proportionate such as evidence of income or other sources of repayment, information on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial commitments. The information shall be obtained from relevant internal or external sources, including the consumer and, where necessary, on the basis of a consultation of a database referred to in Article 19. The necessary data and information that is used to assess creditworthiness shall be limited to: (a) Evidence of identification; (b) Evidence of residence; (c) Where applicable, information on the purpose of the loan; (d) Where applicable, evidence of eligibility for the purposes of the loan; (e) Evidence of employment, including the type, sector, status (e.g. full-time, part- time, contractor, self-employed) and duration; (f) Evidence of income or other sources of repayment (including annual bonus, commission, overtime, where applicable) covering a reasonable period, including payslips, current bank account statements, and audited or professionally verified accounts (for self-employed persons); (g) Information on financial assets and liabilities, e.g. savings account statements and loan statements indicating outstanding loan balances; (h) Information on other financial commitments, such as child maintenance, education fees and alimonies, if relevant; (i) Information on household composition and dependants; (j) Evidence of tax status; (k) Where applicable, evidence of life insurance for the named borrowers; (l) Where applicable, data from credit registers or credit information bureaux or other relevant databases, covering the information on financial liabilities and arrears in payment; (m) Information on the collateral, if any; (n) Evidence of ownership of the collateral; (o) Evidence of the value of the collateral; (p) Evidence of insurance of the collateral; (q) Information on guarantees, other credit risk mitigating factors and guarantors, if any; (r) Rental agreement or evidence of potential rental income for buy-to-let loans, if any; (s) Permissions and cost estimates, if applicable, for real estate building and improvement loans; (t) The household general budget data of the borrower.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 566 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The information obtained in accordance with this paragraph shall be appropriately verified, where necessary through reference to independently verifiable documentation. Personal data as referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 shall not be used for the assessment.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 573 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall ensure that the creditworthiness assessment and corresponding re-payment plans are tailored to the borrower’s specific needs and repayment capacity.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 594 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding the first subparagraphs, Member States may determine that creditors or the providers of crowdfunding credit services may exceptionally make credit available to consumers in specific and well justified circumstances also where the result of the creditworthiness assessment indicates that the obligations resulting from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are not likely to be met in the manner required under that agreement, the creditor or the provider. In this case, Member States shall take complementing measures to ensure that the consumers’ level of cprowdfunding credit services may exceptionally make credit available to the consumer in specific and well justified circumstancestection against over-indebtedness or financial difficulties remains equivalent to the standards otherwise established in this directive.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 602 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Where the creditworthiness assessment involves the use of profiling or other automated processing of personal data, Member States shall ensure that the creditor or provider of crowdfunding services informs the consumer of this fact, and that the consumer has the right to:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 610 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) request and obtain from the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services a clear explanation of the assessment of creditworthiness, including on i) the logic and risks involved in the automated processing of personal data as well as its significance and effects on the decision; ii) the categories of data processed as part of the assessment;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 618 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall ensure that where the credit application is rejected the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services is required to inform the consumer without delay of the rejection and, where applicable, of the fact that the assessment of creditworthiness is based on automated processing of dataprovide justifications for the rejection on paper or another durable medium, and, where relevant, refer the consumer to debt advisory services available in the consumer’s area. Where applicable, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services is required to inform the consumer of the fact that the assessment of creditworthiness is based on automated processing of data and about the consumer’s right to a human intervention and the procedure to contest the decision.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 627 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 9
9. Member States whose legislation requires creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services to assess the creditworthiness of consumers on the basis of a consultation of the relevant database may retain this requirement; however, the assessment shall not be based exclusively on a consumer’s credit history.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 630 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. In the case of open-ended credit or crowdfunding credit services, the relevance of the initial creditworthiness assessment shall be assessed by the creditor or provider of crowdfunding credit services at least every two years. Due adjustments to the repayment schedule shall be made accordingly.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 640 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Member States shall ensure that efficient complaint procedures and out-of- court dispute resolution mechanisms are in place in order to facilitate consumers’ challenges to the content of databases, including information obtained through database searches by third parties.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 642 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Database providers shall have processes in place to ensure that information contained in their databases is up-to-date and accurate. Member States shall ensure that consumers are notified within thirty days of the registration of any negative credit data in a database, informing them of the possibility of exercising their right of access, rectification, erasure and opposition, in line with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR).
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 643 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall require that 1. credit agreements or agreements for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are drawn up on paper or on another durable medium and that all the contracting parties are provided with a copy of the credit agreement or of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services. Copies of credit agreements provided to persons with disabilities shall be drawn up on a medium adapted to their specific abilities.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 657 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the information concerning the new reference rate is also available at the premises and on the website of the creditor or of the provider of crowdfunding credit services.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 659 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where a credit has been granted in the form of an overdraft facility, Member States shall require that the creditor, throughout the duration of the credit agreement, keeps the consumer regularlyat least once per month informed by means of statements of account, on paper or on another durable medium, containing the following elements:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 662 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Where a credit has been granted in the form of an overdraft facility, Member States shall require that the creditor informs the consumer, on paper or another durable medium, of increases in the borrowing rate or in any charges payable, at least two working days before the change in question enters into force.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 669 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In the event of a significant overrunning exceeding a period of one monthtwo weeks, Member States shall require that the creditor informs the consumer without delay, on paper or on another durable medium, of all of the following:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 670 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In addition, in case of regular overrunning, the creditor shall offer to the consumer advisory services, where available and at no cost, or redirect consumers towards debt advisory services.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 699 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the creditor may exceptionally claim higher compensation if the creditor can prove that the loss suffered due to early repayment exceeds the amount determined in accordance with paragraph 2.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 708 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall introduce caps on one or more of the following:: the annual percentage rate of charge, which may take into account the specificities of different consumer credit product
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 712 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) interest rates applicable to credit agreements or to crowdfunding credit services;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 716 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the annual percentage rate of charge;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 717 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the total cost of the credit to the consumer.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 722 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States may introduce lower caps for environmentally sustainable consumer credit products.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 724 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. By 31 December 2023, EBA shall submit a report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission on the implementation of the caps pursuant to paragraph 1 in the Member States. That report shall, at least, contain:(a) a comparison of the Member States’ methodologies to determine the size of the caps;(b) a comparison of the size of the caps across Member States;(c) an assessment of the effectiveness of the caps for the purpose of protecting consumers from excessive fees or charges;(d) based on the assessment in (c), a best practice approach for determining the size of caps.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 725 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall require that the creditor, the credit intermediary and the provider of crowdfunding credit services act honestly, responsibly, fairly, transparently and professionally and take account of the rights and interests of the consumers when carrying out any of the following activities:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 733 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that creditors, credit intermediaries and providers of crowdfunding credit services require their staff to possess and keep up- to-date an appropriate level of knowledge and competence in relation to the manufacturing, the offering and the granting of credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services, the carrying out of credit intermediation activities, the provision of advisory services or crowdfunding credit services and consumer rights in the area of their trade. Where the conclusion of a credit agreement or an agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services includes an ancillary service, appropriate knowledge and competence in relation to that ancillary service shall be required.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 737 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall establish minimum knowledge and competence requirements for the staff of creditors, of credit intermediaries and of providers of crowdfunding credit services, including on environmentally sustainable lending, where relevant.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 745 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall require creditors to have adequate policies and procedures so that they make efforts to exercise, where appropriate, reasonable forbearance before enforcement proceedings are initiated. Such forbearance measures shall be tailored to the consumer’s individual circumstances and take into account, among other elements, the consumer’s circumstances and mayshall consist in, among other at least one or more of the following possibilities:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 747 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) changreducing the interest rate;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 749 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. The list of potential measures in paragraph 1, point (b), is without prejudice to rules set out in national law and does not require Member States to provide for all of those measuresadditional measures set out in national law.;
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 750 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. Member States mayshall require that, where the creditor is permitted to define and impose charges on the consumer arising from a default, those charges are no greater than is necessary to compensate the creditor for costs it has incurred as a result of the default.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 753 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that debt advisory services are made available to consumers free of charge and rendered by staff that is not in a situation of conflict of interest.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 773 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The assignment to a third party of the creditor's rights under a credit agreement or an agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, or of the agreement itself, shall require the explicit consent of the consumer.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 781 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 41 a (new)
Article 41 a Data collection National competent authorities of each Member State shall collect monthly default rates associated with different types of consumer credit products relevant to the scope of this Directive and report that data to the EBA in a standard reporting format. The draft typology of the consumer credit products as well as the technical reporting standard shall be developed by the EBA. The EBA shall provide an annual, comprehensive report to the Commission on these default rates and make it publicly available.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 795 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 46 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The evaluation shall take into account the report referred to in Article 6a(4). The Commission shall assess, and where appropriate, submit proposals to harmonise environmentally sustainable consumer lending practices and ensure ample availability and affordability of environmentally sustainable consumer credit products across the Union.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 169 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Despite the development of sector- specific Union harmonisation legislation that addresses safety aspects of specific products or categories of products, it is practically impossible to adopt Union legislation for all consumer products that exist or may be developed. There is therefore still a need for a broad-based legislative framework of a horizontal nature to fill gaps and, in particular pending revision of the existing sector-specific Union harmonisation legislation, and to complement provisions in existing or forthcoming existing sector-specific Union harmonisation legislation, to ensure consumer protection not otherwise ensured, in particular with a view to achieving a high level of protection of safety and health of consumers, as required by Article 114 and Article 169 of the Treaty.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Whilst some of the provisions such as those concerning most of the obligations of economic operators should not apply to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation since already covered in such legislation, a certain number of other provisions should apply in order to complement Union harmonisation legislation. In particular the general product safety requirement and related provisions should be applicable to consumer products covered by Union harmonisation legislation when certain types of risks are not coverspecifically regulated by that legislation. The provisions of this Regulation concerning the obligations of online marketplaces, the obligations of economic operators in case of distant sales and accidents, the right of information and remedy for consumers as well as the recalls of consumer products should apply to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation when there are not specific provisions with the same objective in such legislation. Likewise RAPEX is already used for the purposes of Union harmonisation legislation, as referred to in Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , therefore the provisions regulating the Safety Gate and its functioning contained in this Regulation should be applicable to Union harmonisation legislation. __________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011 (OJ L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The provisions of Chapter VII of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, setting up the rules of controls on products entering the Union market, are already directly applicable to products covered by this Regulation and it is not the intention of this Regulation to modify such provisions. The stability of the former is particularly important taking into account the fact that the authorities in charge of these controls (which in almost all Member States are the customs authorities) shall perform them on the basis of risk analysis as referred to in Articles 46 and 47 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (the Union Customs Code), the implementing legislation and corresponding guidance. This risk-based approach is pivotal to customs controls given the substantial volumes of goods coming into and leaving the customs territory and results in application of concrete control measures depending on identified priorities. The fact that the Regulation does not modify in any way Chapter VII of Regulation 2019/1020, directly referring to the risk based approach laid down in the customs legislation, means in practice that the authorities in charge of controls on products entering the Union market (including customs authorities) should limitfocus their controls ton the most risky products, depending on the likelihood and impact of the risk, thereby ensuring effectiveness and efficiency of their activities as well as protection of their capacity to perform such controls.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Considering also the broad scope given to the concept of health26 , the environmental risk posed by a product should be taken into consideration in the application of this Regulation inasmuch as it can also ultimately result in a risk to the health and safety of consumers, but also in a risk to the health and safety of the public. __________________ 26 European Environment Agency, ‘Healthy environment, healthy lives: how the environment influences health and well-being in Europe’, EEA report No 21/2019, 8 September 2020.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Union legislation on food, feed and related areas sets up a specific system ensuring the safety of the products covered by it. Therefore, food and feed should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation with the excep. The regulation of materials and articles intended to come into contact with food insofar as riskare covered by this Regulation where aspects are concerned that are not already covered by Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 or by other food specific legislation which only covers chemical and biological food-related risks. __________________ 27 Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC (OJ L 338, 13.11.2004, p. 4).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The requirements laid down in this Regulation should apply to second hand products or products that are repaired, refurbished or recycled that re-enter the supply chain in the course of a commercial activity, except for those products for which the consumer cannot reasonably expect that they fulfil state-of-the art safety standards, such as antiques or products which are presented asintended to be repaired or to be refurbished.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Services should not be covered by this Regulation. However, in order to secure the attainment of the protection of health and safety of consumers, products that are supplied or made available to consumers in the context of the provision of services, including products to which consumers are directly exposed during a service provision, should fall within the scope of this Regulation. Equipment on which consumers ride or travel which is operated by a service provider should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation since it has to be dealt with in conjunction with the safety of the service provided.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18 a) Free and open source software, where the source code is openly shared and users can freely access, use, modify and redistribute the software or modified versions thereof, can contribute to research and innovation. In order to avoid imposing obstacles to such market developments, this Regulation should also not apply to free and open source software, provided that it is not supplied in exchange for a price and that the consumer's personal data are exclusively used for improving the security, com-patibility or interoperability of the software.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 b (new)
(18 b) The software embedded in a product, either preinstalled or installed subsequently within the meaning of Directive 2019/771 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, should be part of the risk assessment pertaining to the product safety, in due consideration of the technical and contractual conditions concerning the software at stake. Due account should be taken of the possibility for the free software community, large parts of it are volunteer-based, to produce software for the general public to use which can be integrated, in whole or in part, to products, including in view of improving the functioning of existing software, without automatically becoming subject to obligations designed for businesses providing digital content in a professional capacity.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) New technologies also cause new risks to consumers’ health and safety or change the way the existing risks could materialise, such as an external intervention hacking the product or changing its characteristics. Where software updates may substantially modify the original product, a new risk assessment should be conducted.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The World Health Organisation defines ‘health’ as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. This definition supports the fact that the development of new technologies might bring new health risks to consumers, such as psychological risk, development risks, in particular for children, mental risks, depression, loss of sleep, or altered brain function. Therefore, these aspects need to be taken into account when assessing whether a product is safe, notably in view of assessing the evolution of immaterial harm related to connected products.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The safety of products should be assessed taking into account all the relevant aspects, notably their characteristics and presentation as well as the specific needs and risks for categories of consumers who are likely to use the products, in particular children, older persons and persons with disabilities. Therefore, if specific information is necessary to make products safe toward a given category of persons, the assessment of the safety of the products should take into consideration also the presence of this information and its accessibility. The safety of products should be assessed taking into consideration the need for the product to be safe over its entire lifespan. The safety of products should be assessed taking into consideration the need for the product to be safe over its entire lifespan.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Economic operators and online marketplaces should have obligations concerning the safety of products, in relation to their respective roles in the supply chain, so as to ensure a high level of protection of the health and safety of consumers. All economic operators and online marketplaces intervening in the supply and distribution chain should take appropriate measures to ensure that they only make available on the market products, which are safe and in conformity with this Regulation. It is necessary to provide for a clear and proportionate distribution of obligations corresponding to the role of each operator in the supply and distribution process.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Distance selling, including online selling, should also fall within the scope of this Regulation. Online selling has grown consistently and steadily, creating new business models and new actors in the market such as the online marketplaces. This Regulation must foresee further obligations in order to ensure the safety of products and the right to access to adequate remedies for consumers.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 209 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
(25 a) The economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 is not always available in the Union. This situation concerns, in particular, products that have been traded via online marketplaces and sent directly to consumers in the Union, without going through fulfilment centers. In such cases, market surveillance authorities cannot enforce measures against economic operators that have placed or made available unsafe products in the internal market. As a consequence, consumers do not always have the possibility to seek redress. In order to give consumers the possibility to exercise their right to access to remedies, online marketplaces that fail to comply with the obligations laid down in this Article or in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) […/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC should ensure adequate and proportionate remedies to consumers if the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 does not fulfil its obligations to provide such remedies.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 210 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 b (new)
(25 b) If online marketplaces have complied with all the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they should not be required to provide remedies to consumers. However, if no economic operator is available for consumer redress, consumers can still seek compensation through ad-hoc national funds. Member States should allocate to their respective funds a proportion of each penalty collected pursuant to Article 40 of this Regulation to finance this fund.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 222 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Moreover, for the purposes of effective market surveillance, online marketplaces should register in the Safety Gate portal and indicate, in the same portal, the information concerning their single contact points for the facilitation of communication of information on product safety issues. The single point of contact under this Regulation might be the same as the point of contact under [Article 10] of Regulation (EU) …/…[the Digital Services Act], without endangering the objective of treating issues linked to product safety in a swift and specific manner. Online marketplaces should check barcodes of new products offered for sale online through their services against the information on dangerous products notified by the market surveillance authorities in Safety Gate portal.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The obligations imposed by this Regulation on online marketplaces should neither de jure or de facto amount to a general obligation to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity, such as the sale of dangerous products online. Online marketplaces should, nonetheless, expeditiously remove content referring to dangerous products from their online interfaces, upon obtaining actual knowledge or, in the case of claims for damages, awareness of the illegal content, in particular in cases where the online marketplace has been made aware of facts or circumstances on the basis of which a diligent economic operator should have identified the illegality in question, in order to benefit from the exemption from liability for hosting services under the 'Directive on electronic commerce' and the [Digital Services Act]. Online marketplaces should process notices concerning content referring to unsafe products, received in accordance with [Article 14] of Regulation (EU) …/…[the Digital Services Act], within the additional timeframes established by this Regulation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 232 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Product traceability is fundamental for effective market surveillance of dangerous products and corrective measures. Consumers should also be protected against dangerous products in the same way in the offline and online sales channels, including when purchasing products on online marketplaces. Building on the provisions of Regulation (EU) …/…[the Digital Services Act] concerning the traceability of traders, online marketplaces should not allow listings on their platforms unless the trader provided all information related to product safety and traceability as detailed in this Regulation, and unless the online marketplace has checked the barcode of the product against the information on dangerous products in the Safety Gate portal to ensure that the product offered for sale complies with this Regulation. Such information should be displayed together with the product listing so that consumers can benefit from the same information made available online and offline. However, the online marketplace should not be responsible for verifying the completeness, correctness and the accuracy of the information itself, as the obligation to ensure the traceability of products remains with the trader. The online platform should make best efforts to assess whether the information provided is reliable and complete and check the information provided by the trader through the use of any freely accessible official online database or online interface made available by an authorised administrator or a Member States or the Union or through direct requests to the trader to provide supporting documents from reliable sources.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Direct selling by economic operators established outside the Union through online channels hinders the work of market surveillance authorities when tackling dangerous products in the Union, as in many instances economic operators may not be established nor have a legal representative in the Union. It is therefore necessary to ensure that market surveillance authorities have adequate powers and means to effectively tackle the sale of dangerous products online. In order to ensure an effective enforcement of this Regulation, the obligation set out in Article 4(1), (2) and (3) of Regulation 2019/1020 should be extended also to all products falling under the scope of the Union harmonisation legislation and to products falling outside the scope of the Union harmonisation legislation to ensure that there is always a responsible economic operator established in the Union, which is entrusted with tasks regarding such products, providing market surveillance authorities and consumers with an interlocutor and performing specific tasks in a timely manner.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) Internal conformity procedures through which economic operators ensure, internally, the effective and swift performance of their obligation as well as the conditions to react timely in case of a dangerous product, should be put in place by the economic operators themselves. However, these procedures should be regularly audited by market surveillance authorities and, when necessary, by independent auditors, in order to ensure a level playing on the internal market.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 240 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Ensuring product identification and the traceability of products throughout the entire supply chain helps to identify economic operators and to take effective corrective measures against dangerous products, such as targeted recalls. Product identification and traceability thus ensures that consumers and economic operators obtain accurate information regarding dangerous products which enhances confidence in the market and avoids unnecessary disruption of trade. Products should therefore bear information allowing their identification and the identification of the manufacturer and, if applicable, of the importer or of the authorised representative. Such traceability requirements could be made stricter for certain kinds of products. Manufacturers should also establish technical documentations regarding their products, which should contain the necessary information to prove that their product is safe.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) National authorities should be enabled to complement the traditional market surveillance activities focused on safety of products with market surveillance activities focusing on the internal conformity procedures set up by economic operators to ensure product safety. Market surveillance authorities should be able to define standard procedures that would reduce potential disparities between internal conformity procedures set up by companies. Market surveillance authorities should be also able to require the manufacturer to indicate which other products - produced with the same procedure, or containing the same components considered to present a risk or that are part of the same production batch - are affected by the same risk.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
(51) Member States should notify in the Safety Gate both compulsory and voluntary corrective measures that prevent, restrict or impose specific conditions on the possible marketing of a product because of a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in case of products covered by Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, also, to the protection of the environment and public security and to other relevant public interests of the end- users.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) Under Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, Member States authorities are to notify measures adopted against products covered by that Regulation, presenting a less than serious risk, through the information and communication system referred to in the same article, while corrective measures adopted against products covered by this Regulation presenting a less than serious risk should be notified in the Safety Gate. Member States and the Commission should make available to the public information relating to risks to the health and safety of consumers posed by products. It is opportune for consumers and businesses that all information on corrective measures adopted against products posing a risk are contained in the Safety Gate, allowing relevant information on dangerous products to be made available to the public through the Safety Gate portal. Member States are therefore encouraged to notify in the Safety Gate all corrective measures on products posing a risk to the health and safety of consumers, to the protection of the environment and public security and to other relevant public interests of the end-users. The database and website of the Safety Gate should be accessible to persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 254 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) The Commission should maintain and further develop the Safety Business Gateway web portal, enabling economic operators and online marketplaces to comply with their obligations to inform market surveillance authorities and consumers of dangerous products they have placed or made available on the market. This tool should also enable economic operators to inform market surveillance authorities of accidents caused by products they have placed or made available on the market. It should enable quick and efficient information exchange between economic operators and national authorities, and facilitate information to consumers from economic operators.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 267 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
(60) The public interface of the Safety Gate, the Safety Gate portal, allows the general public, including consumers, economic operators and online marketplaces, to be informed about corrective measures taken against dangerous products present on the Union market. A separate section of the Safety Gate portal enables consumers to inform the Commission of products presenting a risk to consumer health and safety found in the market. Where relevant, the Commission should provide adequate follow-up, notably by transmitting such information to the concerned national authorities. The database and website of the Safety Gate should be accessible to persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) IPublic access to the information available to the authorities on product safety should be ensured. However, in making available information on product safety to the public, professional secrecy, as referred to in Article 339 of the Treaty, should be protected in a way which is compatible with the need to ensure the effectiveness of market surveillance activities and of protection measures.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 270 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62
(62) When a product already sold to consumers turns out to be dangerous, it may need to be recalled to protect consumers in the Union. Consumers might not be aware that they own a recalled product. In order to increase recall effectiveness, it is therefore important to better reach consumers concerned. Direct contact is the most effective method to increase consumers’ awareness of recalls and encourage action. It is also the preferred communication channel across all groups of consumers. In order to ensure the safety of the consumers, it is important that they are informed in a quick and reliable way. Economic operators and online marketplaces should therefore use the customer data at their disposal to inform consumers of recalls and safety warnings linked to products they have purchased. Therefore, a legal obligation is needed to require economic operators and online marketplaces to use any customer data already at their disposal to inform consumers of recalls and safety warnings. In this respect, economic operators and online marketplaces will make sure to include the possibility to directly contact customers in the case of a recall or safety warning affecting them in existing customer loyalty programmes and product registration systems, through which customers are asked, after having purchased a product, to communicate to the manufacturer on a voluntary basis some information such as their name, contact information, the product model or serial number.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64
(64) To encourage consumer response to recalls it is also important that the action required from consumers be as simple as possible and that the remedies offered be effective, cost-free and timely. Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 provides the consumers with the contractual remedies for a lack of conformity of goods that existed at the time of delivery and became apparent within the liability period. The economic operator responsible for the recall, and, where appropriate, the online marketplace should provide similar remedies to the consumer. __________________ 32 Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22. 5. 2019, p. 28).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64 a (new)
(64 a) Directive 2020/1828/EU on Representative Actions for the Protection of the Collective Interests of Consumers underlines that globalisation and digitalisation have increased the risk of a large number of consumers being harmed by the same unlawful practice and that infringements of Union law can cause consumer detriment. Without effective means to bring unlawful practices to an end and to obtain redress for consumers, consumer confidence in the internal market is reduced. As consumers’ interests are heavily affected by unsafe products which are circulating in the internal market it is justified to include this Regulation to Annex I of Directive 2020/1828/EC.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 66 a (new)
(66 a) Highlights that products can present different risks for different genders and that standards often do not take this into account, which leads to discrepancies in terms of safety and therefore a gender safety gap; Stresses that the Gender Responsive Standards Declaration outlines several actions that national standards bodies and standards developing organisations should include in their gender action plan for gender responsive standards and standards development, in order to achieve gender balanced, representative and inclusive standards.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) In order to play a significant deterrent effect for economic operators and online marketplaces to prevent the placing of dangerous products on the market, penalties should be adequate to the type of infringement, to the possible advantage for the economic operator or online marketplace and to the type and gravity of the risk incurred by the consumer and of the injury suffered by the consumer. Furthermore an homogenous level of penalties is important to ensure a level playing field, avoiding that economic operators or online marketplaces concentrate their activities in territories where the level of penalties is lower.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 278 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
(74) In order to ensure more consistency, a non-exhaustive list of those types of infringements that should be subject to penalties should be included.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 279 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 77
(77) The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to the health and safety of consumers, imperative grounds of urgency so require. The decision may be renewed insofar this is necessary and appropriate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 80
(80) Any processing of personal data for the purpose of this Regulation should be in compliance with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and, (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2002/58. When consumers report a product in the Safety Gate, only those personal data will be stored that are necessary to report the dangerous product and for a period not exceeding five years after such data have been encoded. Manufacturers and importers should hold the register of consumer complaints only as long as it is necessary for the purpose of this Regulation. Manufacturers and importers, when they are natural persons should disclose their names to ensure that the consumer is able to identify the product for purpose of traceability.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 282 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – title
Subject matter and objective
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down essential rules on the safety of consumer productse purpose of this Regulation is to ensure that products placed or made available on the market are safe. In this regard this Regulation lays down essential rules on the safety of consumer products with a view to ensuring that only products that fulfil requirements providing a high level of protection of public interests, such as health and safety in general, health and safety in the workplace, the protection of consumers, the protection of the environment and public security and any other public interests, are placed or made available on the market.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 289 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where products are subject to specific safety requirements imposed by Union legislation, this Regulation shall apply only to the aspects and risks or categories of risks not covered by those requirements thereby posing a threat to consumers' health and safety or other public interests.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 291 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) Chapter II shall not apply insofar as the risks or categories of risks are adequately covered by Union harmonisation legislation are concern. Therefore, when assessing if the risk is adequately covered, the aspects for assessing the safety of products defined in Article 5a must be considered;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) Chapter III, Section 1, Chapters V and VII, Chapters IX to XI shall not apply.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 295 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) equipment on which consumers ride or travel which is operated by a service provider within the context of a service provided to consumers;deleted
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 298 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. This Regulation shall apply to products placed or made available on the market whether new, used, repaired or reconditioned. It shall not apply to products intended to be repaired or reconditioned prior to being used where those products are made available on the market as such.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. ‘product’ means any item, including software other than those offered under a free and open-source licence, interconnected or not to other items, supplied or made available, whether for consideration or not, in the course of a commercial activity including in the context of providing a service – which is intended for consumers or can, under reasonably foreseeable conditions, be used by consumers even if not intended for them. For the purposes of this Regulation ‘product' does not mean free of charge open-source software;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 308 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
1 a. When a product contains embedded software, preinstalled or installed subsequently, the latter shall be considered as an integrated part of the product, within the meaning of Directive 2019/771 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, while taking due account of the different levels of obligations of businesses on the one hand, and of the free software community on the other hand;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. ‘safe product’ means any product which, under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use or misuse, including the actual duration of use, does not present any risk or only the minimum risks compatible with the product's use, considered acceptable and consistent with a high level of protection of health and safety of consumers and taking due account of the precautionary principle;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 319 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. ‘authorised representative’ means any natural or legal person established within the Union who has received a written mandate from a manufacturer to act on his or hetheir behalf in relation to specified tasks;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 329 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
15. ‘online interface’ means any software, including a website, part of a website or an application, including a mobile application, that is operated by or on behalf of an economic operator, and which serves to give end users access to the economic operator's products;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 338 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a Aspects for assessing the safety of products The following aspects shall be taken into account in particular when assessing whether a product is safe: (a) the characteristics of the product, including its design, technical features, composition and chemical constituents, packaging, instructions for assembly and, where applicable, for installation, use and maintenance; (b) the effect on other products, where it is reasonably foreseeable that it will be used with other products, including the options of interconnection among products and the possible loss of interconnection; (c) the security features of a product containing embedded software, including connection and disconnection issues and the reliability of data; (d) the effect that other products might have on the product to be assessed, including the effect of non-embedded items that are meant to determine, change or complete the way another product falling under the scope of this Regulation works, which have to be taken into consideration in assessing the safety of that other product; (e) the presentation of the product, the labelling, any warnings and instructions for its safe use and disposal, and any other indication or information regarding the product; (f) the categories of consumers at risk when using the product, in particular vulnerable consumers such as children, older people and persons with disabilities; (g) the different impact a product may have on the health and safety of different genders; (h) the appearance of the product and in particular where a product, although not foodstuff, resembles foodstuff and is likely to be confused with foodstuff due to its form, odour, colour, appearance, packaging, labelling, volume, size or other characteristics; (i) the fact that although not designed or not intended for use by children, the product resembles an object commonly recognized as appealing to or intended for use by children, because of its design, packaging and characteristics; (j) the appropriate cybersecurity features necessary to protect the product against external influences, including malicious third parties, when such an influence might have an impact on the safety of the product; (k) the evolving, learning and predictive functionalities of a product; (l) the physical, mechanical, electrical, flammability, hygiene and radioactivity hazards that the product may present to the health and safety of consumers; (m) the chemical risks the product may present to the health and safety of consumers, including cumulative and low-dose effects resulting from exposure to chemicals present in the product and from other products; (n) the environmental risk posed by a product inasmuch it is likely to result in a risk to the health and safety of consumers; (o) The mental health risk posed by connected products, including its accumulative and long term health effects and the risk of addiction; (p) the fact that the product, categories or groups of products have caused injuries notified in the European Injury Database as established in Article 25(a) of this Regulation; 2. The feasibility of obtaining higher levels of safety or the availability of other products presenting a lesser degree of risk shall not constitute grounds for considering a product not to be safe. 3. For the purpose of paragraph 1, when assessing whether a product is safe, the following additional elements, when available, shall be taken into account, in particular: (a) European standards other than those the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 10(7) of Regulation (EU) 1025/2012; (b) international standards; (c) international agreements; (d) voluntary certification schemes, in particular third-party conformity assessment frameworks and those conceived to support Union legislation; (e) Commission recommendations or guidelines on product safety assessment; (f) national standards drawn up in the Member State in which the product is made available; (g) the state of the art and technology, including the opinion of recognized scientific bodies and expert committees; (h) product safety codes of good practice in force in the sector concerned; (i) reasonable consumer expectations concerning safety; (j) safety requirements adopted in accordance with Article 6(2).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 341 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – title
Presumption of safetyconformity with safety requirements
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 343 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) in the absence of European standards referred to in point (a), as regards the risks covered by health and safety requirements laid down in the law of the Member State where the product is made available on the market, such laws being drawn up in conformity with the Treaties, if it conforms to such national requirements.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 347 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts determining the specific safety requirements necessary to ensure that products which conform to the European standards satisfy the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5, taking into account the aspects for assessing the safety of products laid down in Article 5a. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 350 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. However, presumption of safetyconformity with the safety requirements under paragraph 1 shall not prevent market surveillance authorities from taking actionppropriate measures under this Regulation, in particular to impose restrictions on products being placed on the market or to require products withdrawal from the market or recall where there is evidence that, despite such conformity, the product is dangerous.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 353 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
[...]deleted
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 392 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The assessment referred to in paragraph 1 shall be performed by taking into consideration the elements referred to in Article 5a(3) or through a voluntary third-party assessment. In particular, third-party conformity assessment may be imposed by the Commission or the Member States for products which present a serious risk according to Article 1(20) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and to Article 26 of this Regulation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Manufacturers shall make publicly available to consumers, communication channels such as telephone number, electronic address or dedicated section of their website, allowing the consumers to file complaints in an easy and accessible way and to inform them of any accident or safety issue they have experienced with the product.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 412 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Manufacturers or, where applicable, their authorised representatives, shall keep distributors, importers and online marketplaces in the concerned supply chain informed of any safety issue that they have identified.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Manufacturers shall draw up technical documentation of the product. The technical documentation before placing it or making it available on the market. The technical documentation shall be easily accessible to consumers and shall contain, as appropriate:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 420 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the list of the European standards referred to in Article 6(1) point a, or the other elements referred to in Article 7(3), applied to meet the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5a (1) and (3), 6(1) point b and 6(2).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 423 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Manufacturers not established in the Union shall ensure that the authorised representative has the technical documentation permanently available.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 424 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Manufacturers shall keep the technical documentation for the lifespan of the product that the consumer may reasonably expect, and, in any case, for a period of at least ten years after the last batch of the product has been placed on the market and make it available to the market surveillance authorities, upon request.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 433 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. Manufacturers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and, the postal and electronic address and the telephone number at which they can be contacted on the product or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the product. The address shall indicate a single contact point at which the manufacturer can be contacted.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 441 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 9
9. Manufacturers shall ensure that procedures are in place for series production to remain in conformity with the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5, 5a and 6.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 443 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. For connected products, manufacturers shall make reasonable efforts to establish a risk-management system including a robust post-marketing monitoring system and record keeping of the performance of connected products to ensure the continued safe functioning of products over their entire life time.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 445 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 10
10. Manufacturers who consider or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in their possession, that a product which they have placed on the market is not safe, shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring the product into conformity, including a withdrawal or recall, as appropriate. They shall inform the distributors of the product in question and, where applicable, the authorised representatives and the importers accordingly.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 452 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 11
11. Manufacturers shall, via the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 25, immediately alert consumers of the risk to their health and safety presented by a product they manufacture and immediately inform the market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which the product has been made available to that effect, giving details, in particular, of the risk to health and safety of consumers and of any corrective measure already taken. In accordance with Article 33, manufacturers shall immediately alert consumers of the risk to their health and safety, presented by a product they manufacture, through clear and targeted information in their national languages, including but not exclusively using digital means.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 456 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. A manufacturer maynot established in the Union shall, by a written mandate, appoint an authorised representative.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 457 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. This Article shall also apply to products covered by Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 458 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Where the manufacturer is not established in the Union and has not complied with the obligations laid down in Article 8, the authorised representative shall be responsible for non-compliance with this Regulation on the same basis as, and jointly and severally with, the manufacturer.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 460 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) provide a market surveillance authority, upon its reasoned request, with all information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the safety of the product, including the mandate agreed with the manufacturer, in an official language which can be understood by that authority;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 461 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) verify that the technical documentation has been drawn up and keep it for the lifespan of the product that the consumer may reasonably expect, and, in any case, for a period of at least ten years after the last batch of the product has been placed on the market and make it available to the market surveillance authorities, upon request;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 462 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where they have a reason to believe that a product in question presents a risk, inform the manufacturer without undue delay, notify the product via the Safety Business Gateway and make reasonable efforts to mitigate the risk;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 465 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) carry out, at least once a year, representative sample testing of products made available on the market chosen under the control of a judicial officer or any qualified person designated by the Member State where the economic operator is situated, in accordance with Article 15(2) of this Regulation. Findings about non-compliances and safety risks shall proactively be communicated to the market surveillance authorities via the Safety Business Gateway;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 466 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(c b) terminate the mandate if the manufacturer acts contrary to its obligations under this Regulation and immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which is established;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 467 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Change of authorised representative The detailed arrangements for a change of authorised representative shall be clearly defined in an agreement between the manufacturer, where practicable the outgoing authorised representative, and the incoming authorised representative. That agreement shall address at least the following aspects: (a) the date of termination of the mandate of the outgoing authorised representative and date of beginning of the mandate of the incoming authorised representative; (b) the transfer of documents, including confidentiality aspects and property rights;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 469 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Before placing a product on the market importers shall ensure that the product is compliant with the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5 and that the manufacturer has complied with the requirements set out in Article 5(a), 6, 8 (4), (6), (7) and (78).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 472 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where an importer considers or has reason to believe that a product is not in conformity with Article 5, 5a and 6 and Article 8(4), (6), (7) and (78), he or she shall not place the product on the market until it has been brought into conformity. Furthermore, where the product is not safe, the importer shall inform the manufacturer and the manufacturer’s authorised representative, and ensure that the market surveillance authorities are informed.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 475 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Importers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, the postal and electronic address and the telephone number at which they can be contacted on the product or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the product. They shall ensure that any additional label does not obscure any information on the label provided by the manufacturer.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 477 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Importers shall ensure that, while a product is under their responsibility, storage or transport conditions do not jeopardize its conformity with the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5, 5(a) and 6 and its conformity with Article 8 (6) and (7).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 480 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Importers shall investigate complaints related to products they made available on the market and file these complaints, as well as products recalls, in the register referred to in Article 8(2), first subparagraph, or and in their own register. Importers shall keep the manufacturer, the authorised representative and distributors informed of the investigation performed and of the results of the investigation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 484 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. Importers shall cooperate with market surveillance authorities and, the manufacturer and other relevant economic operators to ensure that a product is safe.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. Importers who consider or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in their possession, that a product which they have placed on the market is not safe shall immediately inform the manufacturer and the manufacturer’s authorised representative, and ensure that the corrective measures necessary to bring the product into conformity are adopted including withdrawal or recall, as appropriate. In case such measures have not been adopted, the importer shall adopt them. Importers shall ensure that, through the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 25, consumers are immediately and effectively alerted of the risk where applicable and thaimmediately alert market surveillance authorities of the Member States in which they made the product available to that effect be immediately informed, giving details, in particular, of the risk to health and safety of consumers and of any corrective measure already taken. In accordance with Article 33, importers shall immediately alert consumers of the risk to their health and safety, presented by a product they made available, through clear and targeted information in their national languages, including but not exclusively using digital means.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 490 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 9
9. Importers shall keep the technical documentation referred to in Article 8(4) for the lifespan of the product that consumers may reasonably expect and, in any case, for a period of at least 10 years after they have placed the last batch of the product on the market and make it available to the market surveillance authorities, upon request.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 492 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Before making a product available on the market, distributors shall verify that the manufacturer and the importer have complied with the requirements set out in Article 5, 5 (a), 6, 8(6), (7) and (8) and Article 10(3) and (4), as applicable.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 495 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Distributors shall ensure that, while a product is under their responsibility, storage or transport conditions do not jeopardize its conformity with the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5 and its conformity with Article 5 (a), 6, 8(6), (7) and (8) and Article 10(3) and (4), as applicable.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 497 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Distributors who consider or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in their possession, that a product is not in conformity with the provisions referred to in paragraph 2, shall not make the product available on the market until it has been brought into conformity. Furthermore, where the product is not safe, the distributor shall immediately inform the manufacturer or the importer, the importer, and the authorised representative, as applicable, to that effect and shall make sure that, through the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 25, the market surveillance authorities are informed.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 500 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Distributors who consider or have reason to believe, on the basis of the information in their possession, that a product which they have made available on the market is not safe or is not in conformity with Article 5, 5(a), 6, 8(6), (7) and (8) and Article 10(3) and (4), as applicable, shall ensure that the corrective measures necessary to bring the product into conformity are adopted, including withdrawal or recall, as appropriate. Furthermore, where the product is not safe, distributors shall immediately inform the manufacturer or the importer, the importer and the authorised representative, as applicable, to that effect and shall make sure that, through the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 25, the market surveillance authorities of the Member State in which they made the product available to that effect are informed giving details, in particular, of the risk to health and safety and of any corrective measure taken.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 506 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The safety of a product that has been substantially modified within the meaning of paragraph 2 has to be analysed through a new risk assessment in compliance with Article 5, 5a and 6.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 508 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
The economic operators shall ensure that they have internal processes for product safety in place, allowing them to respect the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5. These internal processes shall be regularly audited by market surveillance authorities and, when appropriate, by independent auditors.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 509 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Economic operators shall cooperate with market surveillance authorities and, where relevant, with other authorities regarding actions which could eliminate or mitigate risks that are presented by products made available on the market by those operators.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 515 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Article 4(1), (2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall also apply to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation and by this Regulation. For the purposes of this Regulation, references to “Union harmonisation legislation” in Article 4(1), (2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall be read as “Regulation […]”.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 516 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Where the manufacturer is not established in the Union and has not complied with the obligations laid down in Article 8, the responsible person shall be responsible for non-compliance with this Regulation and with Regulation (EU) 1019/1020 on the same basis as, and jointly and severally with, the manufacturer.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 521 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the tasks referred to in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall periodically carry out: (a) carry out at least once a year sample testing of randomly chosen products made available on the market under the control of a judicial officer or any qualified person designated by the Member State where the economic operator is situated. When the products made available on the market have been subject to a Commission decision adopted under Article 26(1) of this Regulation, the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall carry out, at least once a yearevery six months, for the entire duration of the decision, representative sample testing of products made available on the market chosen under the control of a judicial officer or any qualified person designated by the Member State where the economic operator is situated. (b) verify that the technical documentation has been drawn up and keep it for the lifespan of the product that the consumer may reasonably expect, and, in any case, for a period of at least ten years after the last batch of the product has been placed on the market and make it available to the market surveillance authorities, upon request. (c) terminate the mandate if the manufacturer acts contrary to its obligations under this Regulation and immediately inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State in which is established.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 532 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. For certain products, categories or groups of products, which are susceptible to bear a serious risk to health and safety of consumers, based on accidents registered in the European Injury Database, Safety Business Gateway, the Safety Gate statistics, the results of the joint activities on product safety and other relevant indicators or evidence, the Commission mayshall require economic operators who place and make available those products on the market to establish or adhere to a system of traceability or require independent third-party conformity assessment, when necessary.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 536 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. The system of traceability shall consist in the collection and storage of data, including by electronic means, enabling the identification of the product, its components or of the economic operators involved in its supply chain, as well as in modalities to display and to allow public access to that data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 542 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the modalities to display and to allow public access to data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents as referred to in paragraph 2.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 544 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the compatibility withand interoperability with other traceability systems available at Union or at international level.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 546 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the manufacturer, as well as the postal or electronic address and the telephone number at which they can be contacted;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 551 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) any certification label information, including the CE mark.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 557 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The manufacturer shall ensure that,notify through the Safety Business Gateway referred to in Article 25, an accident caused by a product placed or made available on the market is notified, within two working daywithin 24 hours from the moment it knows about the accident, to the competent authorities of the Member State where the accident has occurred. The notification shall include the type and identification number of the product as well as the circumstances of the accident, if known. The manufacturer shall notify, upon request, to the competent authorities any other relevant information.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 560 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The importers and, the distributors and the authorised representatives which have knowledge of an accident caused by a product that they placed or made available on the market shall inform the manufacturer, which can instruct the importer or one of the distributors to proceed to the notificationnotify the Safety Business Gateway within 24 hours and inform the manufacturer thereof.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 572 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Online marketplaces shall establish a single contact point allowing for direct communication withthe purpose of ensuring a swift and direct communication with all competent authorities and customs authorities, including Member States’ market surveillance authorities in relation to product safety issues, in particular for orders concerning offers of dangerous products.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 578 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Online marketplaces shall take the necessary measures to receive and process the orders issued in accordance with this paragraph. They shall act upon receipt of the order issued without undue delay, and in any event within two working daysexpeditiously in the Member State where the online marketplace operates, from receipt of the order. They shall inform the issuing market surveillance authority of the effect given to the order by using the contacts of the market surveillance authority published in the Safety Gate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 583 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Online marketplaces shall take into account regular information oncheck barcodes of new products offered for sale through their services against dangerous products notified by the market surveillance authorities in line with Article 24, received via the Safety Gate portal, for the purpose of app. Online marketplaces shall expeditiously ing their voluntary measures aimed at detecting, identifying, removing or disabling access to the illegal content referringform the authority that made the notification to the Safety Gate portal of any action taken if the barcode of a product corresponds to a dangerous products offer listed oin their marketplace, w Safety Gate portal and of any othere applicable. They shall inform the authority that made the notification to the Safety Gate of any action taken by usingction taken. To inform the market surveillance authority of any action taken under this Regulation, online marketplaces shall use the contacts of the market surveillance authority published in the Safety Gate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 587 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Online marketplaces which have actual knowledge of an accident caused by a product or a safety related issue caused by a dangerous product made available on the market through their marketplace shall notify this expeditiously in the Safety Business Gateway and inform the manufacturer thereof.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 589 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. Online marketplaces shall give an appropriate answer without undue delay, and in any event within five working days,expeditiously in the Member State where the online marketplace operates, to notices related to product safety issues and dangerous products received in accordance with [Article 14] of Regulation (EU) […/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Service Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 593 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. For the purpose of the requirements of Article 22(7) of Regulation (EU) […/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC, online marketplaces shall design and organise their online interface in a way that enables traders tousing their services to comply with this Regulation. Online marketplaces shall ensure that the traders provide the following information for each product offered and ensures that it is displayed or otherwise made easily accessible by consumers on the product listing:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 596 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the telephone number of the manufacturer, as well as the postal or electronic address at which they manufacturer and trader can be contacted;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 599 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) information to identify the product, including its type and, when available, batch ornumber, serial number or barcode and any other product identifier;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 602 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 – point d
(d) any warning or safety information that is to be affixed on the product or to accompany it in accordance with this Regulation or the applicable Union harmonisation legislation or the relevant technical standards in a language which can be easily understood by consumers.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 605 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The information listed under paragraph 5 of this Article shall be displayed alongside the digital product listing in a clear, intelligible and unambiguous language and in a way that is easily accessible and understandable for all consumers.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 607 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Without prejudice to the prohibition to a general obligation to monitor the information which online marketplaces transmit or store in accordance with Regulation (EU)[…/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC, online marketplaces shall periodically carry out sample testing of randomly chosen products made available on their interface.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 617 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) expeditiously informing the market surveillance authorities of any action taken;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 625 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 – point e
(e) upon request of the market surveillance authorities, when online marketplaces or online sellers have put in place technical obstacles to the extraction of data related to product safety from their online interfaces (data scraping), allowing to scrape such data for product safety purposes based on the identification parameters providedto permit scraping for product safety purposes by the requesting market surveillance authorities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 630 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Member States shall impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on online marketplaces failing to comply with the obligations laid down in the Article, in accordance with Article 40 of this Regulation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 631 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Member States shall make available ad-hoc national funds. If online marketplaces have fulfilled all of their obligations and no economic operator is liable for or capable of ensuring adequate and proportionate remedies for consumers, consumers shall still be able to seek compensation through ad-hoc national funds. Member States shall allocate to their respective funds a proportion of each penalty collected pursuant to Article 40 of this Regulation to finance this fund.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 632 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Online marketplaces that fail to comply with the obligations laid down in this Article or in Article 22 of Regulation (EU)[…/…] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC shall be required to provide adequate and proportionate remedies to consumers if the economic operator referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 does not fulfil its obligations to provide such remedies.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 640 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4
4. Market surveillance authorities mayshall set up schemtandard procedures focusing on control of internal processes for product safety set up by economic operators according to Article 13.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 642 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall communicate to the Commission, once a year, data concerning the implementation of this Regulation. A summary report shall be made available to the public.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 648 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) on the basis of provisions of this Regulation in relation to products presenting a risk to the health and safety of consumers, a risk for the protection of the environment and public security and a risk to any other relevant public interests of the end-users;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 654 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The notification shall be submitted in the Safety Gate within two working day48 hours from the adoption of the corrective measure.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 657 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. Where a Member State notifies corrective measures taken in relation to products presenting a serious risk, the other Member States shall notify in the Safety Gate the measures and actions taken subsequently in relation to the same products and any other relevant information, including the results of any tests or analyses carried out, withiout undue delay and in any case no later than two working days from the adoption of the measures or actions.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 659 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall develop an interfaceimplement the interface established in Article 20(5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 between the information and communication system referred to in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and the Safety Gate, in order to avoid double data entry and enable a draft Safety Gate notification to be triggered from that information and communication system.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 661 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall maintain a web portal enabling the economic operators to provide market surveillance authorities and consumers with the information referred to in Articles 8(11), 9(2) point c), 10(8), 11(3), 11(4) and Article 19, which must be accessible to consumers with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 668 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 a (new)
Article 25 a EUROPEAN INJURY DATABASE 1. The Commission shall establish and coordinate a European Injury Database, that covers all type of injuries caused by products placed or made available on the Union market. 2. The market surveillance authorities of Member States shall register the injury data to the database, in compliance with Union and national rules on data protection. 3. The Commission shall establish a common methodology for data collection and oversight the registration of data made by market surveillance authorities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 673 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. If the Commission becomes aware of a product, or a specific category or group of products presenting a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers, it may take any appropriate measures, either on its own initiative or upon request of Member States, by means of implementing acts, adapted to the gravity and urgency of the situation if, at one and the same time:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 675 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it emerges from prior consultations with the Member States that they differ significantly on the approach adopted or to be adopted to deal with the risk; and or;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 676 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the risk cannot be dealt with, in view of the nature of the safety issue posed by the product, category or group of products, in a manner compatible with the degree of gravity or urgency of the case, under other procedures laid down by the specific Union legislation applicable to the products concerned; andor
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 679 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Those measures may include measures prohibiting, suspending or restricting the placing or making available on the market of such products or laying down special conditions for their conformity assessment, including third-party assessment, and marketing, in order to ensure a high level of consumer safety protection.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 680 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the health and safety of consumers the Commission may adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(4). The decision may be renewed insofar this is necessary and appropriate.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 685 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Where market surveillance authorities in other Member States reach a different conclusion in terms of identification or level of the risk on the basis of their own investigation and risk assessment, the Member States concerned may request the Commission to arbitrate. In that case, the Commission shall invite all Member States to express a recommendation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 688 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. A European network of the authorities of the Member States competent for product safety (‘Consumer Safety Network’) shall be established. Consumer organisations shall be observers to the Network.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 690 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the exchange of information on risk assessments, dangerous products, test methods and results, recent scientific developments as well as other aspects relevant for control activities, such as consideration of European Standards providing presumption of conformity with this legislation;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 692 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the establishment and execution of joint surveillance and testing projects the establishment and execution of joint surveillance and testing projects, including in the context of e-commerce;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 694 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. The Consumer Safety Network shall coordinate its action and exchange information with the other existing Union activitiesbodies, including the Consumer Protection Coordination network and the European Data Protection Board, in particular when assessing the safety of products or deciding on the remedies to consumers pursuant to Article 35.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 706 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the market surveillance authorities concerned, sweeps shall be coordinated by the Commission. The coordinator of the sweep may, where appropriate,shall make the aggregated results publicly available.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 711 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. Protection of professional secrecy shall not prevent the dissemination to the competent authorities of Member States and the Commission of information relevant for ensuring the effectiveness of market monitoring and surveillance activities. The authorities receiving information covered by professional secrecy shall, in duly justified cases, ensure its protection.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 715 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of Article 31(1) and Article 19, the Commission shall maintain a Safety Gate portal, providing the general public with free access to selected information notified in accordance with Article 24. This information shall be provided in accessible formats to persons with disabilities.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 723 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. In case of a recall or where certain information has to be brought to the attention of consumers to ensure the safe use of a product (‘safety warning’), economic operators and online marketplaces, in accordance with their respective obligations as provided for in Articles 8, 9, 10, 11 and 1120, shall directly notify all affected consumers that they can identify. Economic operator wihtout undue delay. Economic operators and online marketplaces who collect their customers’ personal data shall make use of this information for recalls and safety warnings.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 727 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. Where economic operators and online marketplaces have product registration systems or customer loyalty programs in place for purposes other than contacting their customers with safety information, they shall offer the possibility to their customers to provide separate contact details only for safety purposes. The personal data collected for that purpose shall be limited to the necessary minimum and mayshall only be used to contact consumers in case of a recall or safety warning.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 732 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. If not all affected consumers can be contacted directly, economic operators and online marketplaces, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, shall disseminate a recall notice or safety warning through other appropriate channels, ensuring the widest possible reach including, where available: the company’s website, social media channels, newsletters and retail outlets and, as appropriate, announcements in mass media and other communication channels. Information shall be accessible to consumers with disabilities. Consumer organisations shall also be informed in order to support the dissemination of the information.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 735 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) clear description of the hazard associated with the recalled product, avoidwithout using any elements that may decrease consumers’ perception of risk, including terms and expressions such as “voluntary”, “precautionary”, “discretionary”, “in rare/specific situations” as well as indicating that there have been no reported accidents;
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 738 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission, by means of implementing acts, shall set out the template for a recall notice, taking into account scientific and market developments. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 42(2). Accessibility features and alternative formats must be provided by the templates.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 740 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/771 and Directive (EU) 85/374 , in the case of a recall, the economic operator responsible for the recall or, in accordance with Article 20 of this Regulation, the online marketplace shall offer to the consumer an effective, cost- free and timely remedy. That remedy shall consist of at least one of the following:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 750 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) refund of the valuinitial purchase price of the recalled product.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 752 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/771, the economic operator responsible for recall shall prioritise the repair of the product, unless it is disproportionate or it does not result in a lesser level or safety.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 757 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Where no economic operator offers a remedy to the consumer, the consumer shall be entitled to submit a complaint to the competent authority in accordance with Article 31(4).
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 759 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 a (new)
Article 35 a Right to an effective judicial remedy Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected consumer or organisation representing consumers and other interested parties shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to the failure of economic operators to comply with their obligations under this Regulation.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 760 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 b (new)
Article 35 b Amendments to Directive 2020/1828/EC on Representative Actions for the Protection of the Collective Interests of Consumers The following is added to Annex I of Directive 2020/1828/EC: “(X) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a General Product Safety Regulation”
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 761 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission mayshall cooperate, including through the exchange of information, with third countries or international organisations in the field of application of this Regulation, such as:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 762 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall provide third countries or international organisations with selected information from its Safety Gate system and receive relevant information on the safety of consumer products and on preventive, restrictive and corrective measures taken by those third countries or international organisations. The Commission shall share such information with national authorities, where relevant.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 765 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) activities carried out by consumer organisations for the enhancement of market surveillance policies and systems as well as to consumer information which contribute to a higher level of safety in the EU.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 768 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The types of infringements by economic operators or online marketplaces, where applicable, subject to penalties shall be at least any of the following:
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 781 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. By [insert date five years after the date of entry into force] the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation. The Commission shall present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular assess if this Regulation achieved the objective of enhancing the protection of consumers against dangerous products, in particular with regard to improved traceability, the level and functioning of market surveillance, standardisation work, the functioning of the Safety Gate and challenges posted by new technologies and by online marketplaces, while taking into account its impact on businesses and in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises.
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 783 #

2021/0170(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1025/2012
Article 10
7. Where a European standard drafted in support of Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council48 [this Regulation (GPSR)] satisfies the general safety requirement laid down in Article 5 of that Regulation and the specific safety requirements referred to in [Article [6] and [5a] of that Regulation], the Commission shall publish a reference of such European standard without delay in the Official Journal of the European Union. __________________ 48 Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directive 87/357/EEC and Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ …)’
2022/01/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) With the view to ensuring a fair level-playing field in the internal market, this Regulation should focus not only on financial contributions to the benefit of undertakings but also on receiving advantages that can be economically equivalent to a financial contribution. A wide-definition of foreign subsidy should therefore encompass cases where a third country fails to comply with minimum environmental, social and labour standards that are ratified under international conventions, thereby giving a competitive advantage to some undertakings;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 39 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Once the existence of a foreign subsidy is established, the Commission should assess whether the foreign subsidy distorts the internal market. This assessment should balance the short and long- term negative effects of a foreign subsidy in terms of distortion on the internal market with positive effects on the development of the relevant economic activity including any positive environmental or social externalities in the third country providing the subsidy. Unlike State aid granted by a Member State, foreign subsidies are not generally prohibited. Subsidies in the form of export financing may be a cause of particular concern because of their distortive effects. This is not the case if such financing is provided in line with the OECD Arrangement on officially supported export credits. The Commission should assess on a case-by- case basis whether a foreign subsidy distorts the internal market.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) When applying these indicators, the Commission could take into account different elements such as the size of the subsidy in absolute terms or in relation to the size of the market or to the value of the investment. For instance, a concentration, in the context of which a foreign subsidy covers a substantial part of the purchase price of the target, is likely to be distortive. Similarly, foreign subsidies covering a substantial part of the estimated value of a contract to be awarded in a public procurement procedure are likely to cause distortions. If a foreign subsidy is granted for operating costs, it seems more likely to cause distortions than if it is granted for investment costs. Foreign subsidies to small and medium-sized undertakings may be considered less likely to cause distortions than foreign subsidies to large undertakings. Furthermore, the characteristics of the market, and in particular the competitive conditions on the market, such as barriers to entry, should be taken into account. Foreign subsidies leading to overcapacity by sustaining uneconomic assets or by encouraging investment in capacity expansions that would otherwise not have been built are likely to cause distortions. A foreign subsidy to a beneficiary that shows a low degree of activity in the internal market, measured for instance in terms of turnover achieved in the Union, is less likely to cause distortions than a foreign subsidy to a beneficiary that has a more significant level of activity in the internal market. Finally, foreign subsidies not exceeding EUR 5 million should be deemed, as a general rule, unlikely to distort the internal market within the meaning of this Regulation.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) When a foreign financial contribution is notified in the context of a public procurement procedure, the assessment should be limited to that procedure.deleted
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Foreign subsidies that enable an undertaking to submit a tender which is unduly advantageous, i.e. abnormally low tenders pursuant to Directive 2014/24/EU, in relation to the works, supplies or services concerned should be deemed to actually or potentially create a distortion in a public procurement procedure. Those distortions should therefore be assessed on the basis of the non-exhaustive set of indicators described in recitals 13 and 14 as well as the notion of unduly advantageous tender. The indicators should allow to determine how the foreign subsidy distorts competition by improving the competitive position of an undertaking and enabling it to submit an unduly advantageous tender. The opportunity should be given to undertakings to justify that the tender is not unduly advantageous, including by adducing the elements referred to in Article 69(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. The prohibition of the award should only apply where the advantageous nature of the tender benefiting from foreign subsidies cannot be justified, the tender would be awarded the contract and the undertaking submitting the tender did not offer commitments considered appropriate and sufficient to fully and effectively remove the distortion.In this regard, non-compliance with international environmental, social and labour conventions by an undertaking should constitute an advantage economically equivalent to a financial contribution that has a distortive effect on competition resulting in an uneven level- playing field. The prohibition of the award should only apply where the advantageous nature of the tender benefiting from foreign subsidies cannot be justified
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
(1) This Regulation lays down rules and procedures for investigating foreign subsidies that distort the internal market and for redressing such distortions with a view to ensuring a fair level-playing field in the internal market. Such distortions may arise with respect to any economic activity, and in particular in concentrations and public procurement procedures.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the nature of the subsidy, including an advantage that is economically equivalent to a financial contribution;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) with reference to point (b), an advantage that is economically equivalent to financial contribution shall include policy measures enacted in a third country such as inadequately remunerated special or exclusive rights or a failure to comply with relevant minimum binding international environmental, social and labour requirements that are ratified in the legal international order.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
(2) A foreign subsidy is unlikely to distort the internal market if its total amount is below EUR 5 millionthe de minimis threshold rule laid down in Commission Regulation N°1407/2013 over any consecutive period of three fiscal years.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) The Commission is empowered to adopt a delegated act to update the indicators referred to in paragraph 1.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) a foreign subsidy or an advantage economically equivalent to a financial contribution enabling an undertaking to submit an unduly advantageous tender or abnormally low tender pursuant to Directive2014/24/EU, on the basis of which the undertaking would be awarded the public contract.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
(1) To remedy the distortion on the internal market actually or potentially caused by a foreign subsidy, the Commission mayshall impose redressive measures unless the balancing test pursuant to Article 5 has demonstrated that positive effects outweighs negative ones, including any positive environmental or social externalities in the third country granting the subsidy. The undertaking concerned may also offer commitments.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point h a (new)
(ha) excluding the undertaking from procurement procedures for a certain period of time when it is demonstrated that the undertaking has received distortive foreign subsidies or an advantage that is economically equivalent to a financial contribution that results in submission of abnormally low tenders.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
(4) The Commission mayshall impose reporting and transparency requirements.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 116 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission mayshall conduct the necessary inspections of undertakings.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 7
(7) Upon requestnotification of the Commission, a Member State shall in its own territory carry out any inspection or other fact- finding measure under its national law in order to establish whether there is a foreign subsidy distorting the internal market.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Foreign subsidies or an advantage that is economically equivalent to a financial contribution that cause or risk causing a distortion in a public procurement procedure shall be understood as foreign subsidies that enable an undertaking to submit a tender that is unduly advantageous or abnormally low in relation to the works, supplies or services concerned. The assessment of whether there is a distortion on the internal market pursuant to Article 3 and whether a tender is unduly advantageous in relatForeign subsidies granted during the three years prionr to the works, supplies or services concerned shall be limited to the public procurement procedure at stake. Only foreign subsidies granted during the three years prior to the notificationnotification and known future subsidies to be effective during the performance of the contract shall be taken into account in the assessment.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
(2) For the purpose of Article 28, a notifiable foreign financial contribution in an EU public procurement procedure shall be deemed to arise where the estimated value of that public procurement is equal or greater than EUR 25100 million.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 140 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
(1) When submitting a tender or a request to participate in a public procurement procedure, undertakings shall either notify to the contracting authority or the contracting entity all foreign financial contributions received in the three years preceding that notification or confirm in a declaration that they did not rknown future subsidies to be effecetive any foreign financial contributions in the last three yearsduring the performance of the contract. Undertakings which do not submitnotify such information or declaration shall not be awarded the contract.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
(2) The obligation to notify foreign financial contributions under this paragraph shall extend to economic operators, groups of economic operators referred to in Article 26(2) of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 19(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 37(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU, main subcontractors and main suppliers. A subcontractor or supplier shall be deemed to be main where their participation ensures key elements of the contract performance and in any case where the economic share of their contribution exceeds 310% of the estimated value of the contract.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 150 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6
(6) Where the Commission suspects that an undertaking may have benefitted from foreign subsidies in the three years prior to the submission of the tender or request to participate in the public procurement procedure or known future subsidies to be effective during the performance of the contract, it may request the notification of the foreign financial contributions received by that undertaking in any public procurement procedure which are not notifiable under Article 27(2) or fall within the scope of paragraph 5 of this Article, at any time before the award of the contract. Once the Commission has requested the notification of such a financial contribution, it is deemed to be a notifiable foreign financial contribution in a public procurement procedure.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
(1) Where, after an in-depth investigation, the Commission finds that an undertaking benefits from a foreign subsidy or an advantage economically equivalent to a financial contribution which distorts the internal market pursuant to Articles 3 to 5, and where the undertaking concerned offers commitments that fully and effectively remove the distortion on the internal market, it shall adopt a decision with commitments pursuant to Article 9(3). The assessment under Article 5 shall not result in a modification of the initial tender submitted by the undertaking that is incompatible with Union law.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) For cases where the Commission adopts at least two decisions vis-à-vis an undertaking in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, it may adopt a decision prohibiting for a certain period of time an award of contract in any public procurement procedures.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
(3) The contract may be awarded to an undertaking submitting a declaration under Article 28 before the Commission takes any of the decisions referred to in Article 30 or before the time limit laid down in Article 29(4) elapses only if the tender evaluation has established that the undertaking in question has in any case submitted the most economically advantageous tender.deleted
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 a (new)
Article 31a Cooperation with contracting authorities and Member States 1. Where a Member State suspects that a financial contribution or an advantage economically equivalent to a financial contribution may have a distortive effect in the internal market with regard to access to public procurement procedures, it shall inform the Commission with a view to requesting the opening of an investigation. It shall submit evidence to support this request. The Commission may decide not to open an investigation and inform the relevant national competent authority of its decision. 2. Where a contracting authority or contracting entity suspects that an undertaking has submitted an abnormally low tender, it shall require the undertaking to provide explanations with regard to price and costs proposed in relation to works, supplies or services in accordance with Article69 of Directive 2014/24/EU. Where the contracting authority or contracting entity has established that the abnormally low tender is caused by a foreign subsidy or non- compliance with environmental, social and labour requirements as ratified under international conventions, it shall exclude the undertaking from the public procurement procedure and notify it to the Commission.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 176 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission mayshall impose fines and periodic penalty payments as set out in Article 15.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
(2) In addition, the Commission mayshall impose by decision on the undertakings concerned fines not exceeding 1 % of their aggregate turnover in the preceding business year, where they intentionally or negligently supply incorrect or misleading information in a notification pursuant to Article 28 or supplement thereto;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
(3) The Commission mayshall impose by decision on the undertakings concerned fines not exceeding 10 % of their aggregate turnover in the preceding business year where they, intentionally or negligently, fail to notify a subsidy in accordance with Article 28 during the public procurement procedure.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 189 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
(1) Where the information available substantiates a reasonable suspicion that foreign subsidies in a particular sector, for a particular type of economic activity or based on a particular subsidy instrument may distort the internal market, the Commission mayshall conduct a market investigation into the particular sector, the particular type of economic activity or into the use of the subsidy instrument concerned. In the course of that market investigation, the Commission mayshall request the undertakings or associations of undertakings concerned to supply the necessary information and may carry out the necessary inspections. The Commission may also request the Member State or third country concerned to supply information.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 191 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
(2) The Commission mayshall publish a report on the results of its market investigation into particular sectors, particular types of economic activity or particular subsidy instruments and invite comments from interested parties.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) amending the thresholds for notifications as set out in Articles 18 and 27, in the light of the practice of the Commission during the first fivetwo years of application of this Regulation, and taking into account the effectiveness of application;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) exempting certain categories of undertakings concerned from the obligation to notify pursuant to Articles 19 and 28, in light of the practice of the Commission in the first fivetwo years of application of this Regulation, in case this practice allows to identify economic activities where foreign subsidies are unlikely to distort the internal market;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 196 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) specifying the definition of "advantage economically equivalent to a financial contribution" as set out in Article 2;
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 198 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) supplementing the indicators as set out in Article 3.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
Within fivetwo years after the entry into force of this Regulation at the latest, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation, accompanied, where the Commission considers it appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals. The report shall include a dedicated section on Chapter IV of this Regulation and take into consideration the following elements: – Number of prior notifications received by the Commission in accordance with Article 28; – Number of in-depth investigations opened according to Article 29; – Number of decisions issues where it has been found that a foreign subsidy has a distortive effect on the internal market; – Number of notifications received by the Commission from a national competent authority in accordance with Article 31(a).1; – Number of notifications received by the Commission from a contracting authority in accordance with Article 31(a).2.
2022/02/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas human rights abuses are widespread in resource-rich conflict- affected and high-risk areas and may include child labour, sexual violence, the disappearance of people, forced resettlement, illegal land grabs and the destruction of ritually or culturally significant sites;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. Whereas, since it was launched in 2003, there are documented concerns that the Kimberley Process is not able to address the broader range of risks to human rights posed by the trade in diamonds;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Recital A c (new)
A c. Whereas since the entry into force of the Kimberley Process as a global initiative in 2003 the reality of conflict diamonds has evolved and the EU seeks to broaden the scope of the conflict diamonds definition, in order to better take into account the evolving context on the ground;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses the need to address the human rights dimension of conflict diamonds and the urgent need to ensure that cut and polished stones, as well as rough diamonds, are not linked to human rights abuses;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Considers that there is a need to complement and strengthen the Kimberley Process with an overarching mandatory due diligence regime in order to cover human rights risks across the entire value chain;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2021/0060(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Calls on the Union to continue to be actively engaged in responsible sourcing initiatives such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas (‘OECD Due Diligence Guidance’) as well as the updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Reiterates that responsible sourcing and due diligence must be in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
2021/09/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that competition policy is vital to strengthening and ultimately completingthe proper functioning and strengthening of the single market by providing a fair and level playing field for all market participants, both in non-digital and digital markets, enabling the growth of innovative businesses, and guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection and choice by leading to higher product choice, not only in terms of lowest price but also in terms of quality features; Considers furthermore that SMES would benefit from rigorous application of competition rules, both in offline and digital spheres;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that competition rules, consumer welfare and sustainability issues are closely interlinked; highlights therefore the need to address sustainability in shaping EU competition policy tools, especially in its ex-ante regulatory mechanism as well as State Aid guidelines, to be a supporting tool to the objectives of the Green New Deal, Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Paris Agreement, and address market distortions by taking into consideration all aspects of unfair competition, including social and environmental negative externalities;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 10 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Highlights that in a global economy, potential distortion to competition in the internal market emanates from companies established outside the EU; calls on the Commission to enhance global cooperation on competition to provide for a level-playing field with third countries, particularly when it comes to State aid; asks furthermore for unfair trading practices to be addressed effectively, including taking into account social and environmental dumping;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that regulating digital markets and strengthen fair competition between market participants by addressing both market failures and unfair business-to business practices constitutes a core responsibility of the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection; in this context, highlights the adoption of the P2B Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/11501 ) and notes that ex ante regulatory intervention will address the gaps in ex post competition law enforcement; __________________ 1 OJ L 186, 11.7.2019, p. 57.
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 51 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of clear measures to ensure effective enforcement and supervision of competition law at the EU level, especially in the context of fast- moving markets; underlines that the compliance of provisions must be reinforced with effective and proportionate penalties;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to ensure fair and secure and open-data access to data for all market participants, and in particular SMEs and micro-enterprises; notes that it should empower consumers to control their data and provide them with additional rights in terms of data portability and interoperability in order to ensure that the single market for data is based on European values and fair competition. ; asks furthermore the Commission to take into account the effects of access to personal and financial data when assessing market and network power, i.e. whether merging data and customer information during a merger distorts competition and weakens data protection, and whether an enterprise's access to exclusive analytical methods and patents excludes competitors;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2020/2223(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls that consumer welfare is and remain an essential aspect of competition policy; stresses in this perspective that the concept of a ‘fair price’ should not be equated with the lowest consumer price possible, but instead should be reasonable and enable the fair remuneration of all actors; considers that a focus on lowest-possible consumer prices ignores the negative externalities associated with certain types of production;
2021/01/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for the EU to ensure trade works also for the economically disadvantaged; in this regard recalls that the specific actions to promote ‘fair and ethical trade schemes’ to which the Commission committed in the ‘Trade for All’ strategy have become even more relevant under the current circumstances given that Fair Trade bottom-up initiatives can ensure that trade benefits the economically disadvantaged actors in the supply chain; calls on the Commission to promote Fair Trade initiatives through EU programs involving young people and the private sector, in external action in general, in the implementation of chapters on trade and sustainable development, through EU delegations as well as by rewarding best practices and facilitating knowledge exchange amongst EU local, regional, national authorities, civil society, schools and universities, including through the extension of the ‘EU cities for fair and ethical trade award’ to schools and universities and the setting up of an annual Fair Trade week hosted in Brussels by the European Commission; demands the European Commission to report on the support of Fair Trade initiatives by the EU and the member states;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the transition to a resource-efficient and climate neutral economy based on the principles of a Circular Economy respects the planetary boundaries by shifting away from the dependency on the use of resources and raw materials, mass consumption and waste production;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Whereas within the framework of the European Green Deal, ambitious legislation as outlined in the Circular Economy Action Plan released in March 2020 should aim at reducing the total environmental and resource footprint of EU production and consumption, with resource efficiency, zero pollution, non- exposure to harmful and toxic substances, and waste prevention as priorities; whereas trade policy is key to implement these aims;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas a Circular Economy aims at closing and slowing material, product and resources loops by reusing, sharing, repairing, upgrading, recycling, fostering interoperability and a longer lifetime of products;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 2 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1 a. Whereas the COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated the need for a resilient economy based on sustainable and shorter supply chains which Circular Economy will bring forward by closing and slowing down material, product and resources loops; whereas closed material loops and shorter supply chains will lead to less dependency on raw material imports and less waste export and thus contribute to the EU’s open strategic autonomy;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas closed material loops and shorter supply chains will eventually lead to value added within the EU's internal market, to innovation, employment and competitiveness while ensuring a high level of consumer protection and sustainability;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that trade policy is an essential tool for implementing the circular economy and the EU’s sustainability agenda globally and underlines therefore the importance of ensuring that trade and investment agreements do not contradict circular economy policies; considers it necessary to provide for carve-outs in trade agreements for relevant EU legislation on circular economy from the notion of trade barrier, as well as stronger and adequate legal environmental safeguards; underlines that increased recycling can reduce the EU’s reliance on imports of raw materials, and points to the need to decouple economic growth from resource extraction and use in order to ensure the long- term sustainability of global value chains; calls on the Commission to adapt the EU’s Raw Materials Strategy accordingly including the regular request of the EU to trade partners to abolish export duties on raw materials;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D
D. whereas the single market is a powerful tool that must be used to develop sustainable and circular products and technologies and should reflect environmental, economic, social and ethical considerations;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E
E. whereas investing in circular production patterns and in the reuse and repair sector is a source of economic and social opportunities, creates jobs and drives industrial competitiveness;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital F
F. whereas the COVID19 crisis has demonstrated the need for a resilient economy based on sustainable and shorter supply chains;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital G
G. whereas within the framework of the European Green Deal, ambitious legislation as outlined in the Circular Economy Action Plan released in March 2020 should aim to reduce the total environmental and resource footprint of EU production and consumption, with resource efficiency, zero pollution, non- exposure to harmful and toxic substances, and waste prevention as key priorities;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that producing and placing sustainable products on the internal market should be the norm and calls for a horizontal Sustainable Product Framework Directive setting mandatory minimum requirements at design, production and marketing stage for durability, interoperability, reparability, upgradability, reusability and recyclability for all products alongside further product- specific requirements; calls furthermore for such a comprehensive legislative proposal to be delivered timely and not to be further postponed in order to contribute to the economy recovery of the EU subsequent to the COVID19-crisis;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Considers that placing sustainable products on the internal market should be the norm and welcomes the proposals for mandatory minimum requirements for durability, interoperability, reparability, upgradability, reusability and recyclability for all products alongside further product- specific requirements and calls for these mandatory standards as well as for any future mandatory labelling requirements to be equally applied to imported goods in order to create a level playing field; calls to ensure removing double standards between products that producers from within the EU can place on the EU market and what they can export to third country markets;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. RIs convinced that the development of a comprehensive set of legislation on the circular economy would give the EU an advantage in developing relevant standards including at the international level; regrets the lack of international and European standards on waste quality as this hinders a viable trade policy that is conducive to the circular economy; calls on the Commission to present harmonised standards on waste quality and a legal definition of recyclable waste, and to include these in future FTAs;; recalls the Commission's commitment within the EU Green Deal for the EU to stop exporting its waste outside of the EU; supports therefore the announced revision of the rules on waste shipments and illegal exports."
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights that ensuring non- exposure to chemicals and other harmful toxic substances is a pre-condition to a safe circular economy; Calls therefore on the Commission to take regulatory measures to eliminate chemicals and toxic substances from consumer products to ensure the highest level possible of safety for consumers;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 30 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that in the transition to a circular economy particular attention must be given to key supply chains where the EU’s environmental footprint is significant such as the textile value chain; highlights that for many value chains, such as the textile one, this will entail an absolute reduction of global textile production;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates its call to the Commission to implement the provisions of Directive 2014/53/EU on radio- equipment by adopting without delay the delegated act to introduce a common charger for mobile phones, tablets, e- books readers, and other small- and medium electronic devices as part of a global strategy to reduce electronic waste; asks the Commission to develop in parallel a decoupling strategy that ensures consumers are not obliged to buy new chargers with new devices to allow for greater environmental benefits;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 34 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. stresses that supply chain transparency and product traceability are important tools to implement the circular economy and the EU’s sustainability agenda including detailed information on upstream and downstream production process and environmental and social impacts that will drive more sustainable practices and provide information on whether products are aligned with the circular economy objectives; welcomes therefore the Commission’s intention to develop a digital product passport; calls, in this regard, for mandatory information requirements to apply throughout the supply chain, covering not only aspects such as durability and reparability, but also social and environmental conditions;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to empower consumers to further engage in sustainable consumption practices; calls for mandatory labelling on product durability, i.e. expected product’s lifetime, and reparability, and the development of a repair score, in addition to minimum information requirements both at advertising and pre-contractual stage; asks for both the legal guarantee rights and the reversed burden of proof rules to be extended based on the lifespan of products under Directive 2019/771, the introduction of direct producer liability, and for legislative measures to ban practices resulting in premature obsolescence vis-a-vis the seller to incentivise manufacturers to produce more sustainable and durable goods, and for legislative measures to ban practices which curtail the life of a product, such as preventing repairs, introducing a design fault or slowing performance of a device, resulting in premature obsolescence by adding those to the Annex I of the Directive 2005/29/EU;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 40 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. welcomes the Commission’s future legislative initiative on supply chain due diligence to ensure that companies have an obligation to respect human rights, the environment and good governance;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2020/2077(INI)

4. CRecalls that in order for the EU to reach the objective of carbon neutrality by 2050, it is necessary to address the carbon footprint in EU’s demand for imported products; calls on the Commission to take concrete steps in differentiating products based on their carbon content also as a way to level the regulatory playing field; calls on the Commission to identify and abolish barriers that prevent or restrict market access for circular and C02-neutral products from outside the EU and to investigate the possibilities and benefits of reducing tariffs on certain products in order to encourage the development of the circular economy including in the context of the ongoing review of the EU Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP);
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recommends further legislative measures to be adopted to tackle misleading green claims towards consumers by setting up procedures to substantiate them before a product is placed on the market, as well as by establishing a public European register listing authorised and banned environmental claims;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission to ensure that all available trade instruments including FTAs reflect the objectives of the circular economy by including strong, binding and enforceable sustainable development chapters; suggests that the circular economy should be addressed in a cross-cutting manner in all relevant FTA chapters; calls on the Commission to make progress at the WTO with regard to the recognition of processes and production methods (PPMs) as an element to distinguish between products with a special focus on circular production methods;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the establishment of an EU-wide ‘right to repair’; calls, in this context, for measures to provide unrestricted and free access to repair and maintenance information and to spare parts to all market participants, including to ensure those parts are priced the same way to authorized and independent repairers as well as consumers, to define a mandatory minimum period of time for the availability of spare parts and/or updates, a of software based on the expected lifetime of a product, a reasonable maximum time- limit for their delivery, and for repair to be given priority under the legal guarantee regim expressed in working days that cannot be longer than seven working days, and for repair to be given priority under the legal guarantee regime; adds that an effective right to repair must ensure affordable repair for consumers, also by establishing measures to impose a cap on the price of spare parts that should not exceed 30% of the product’s price;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the Commission to engage with the EU’s trading partners to further support the objectives of the circular economy; reminds that sustainability does not only require ambitious measures related to environment, climate change or biodiversity but should also focus on human rights and social issues as exemplified in the SDGs; stresses that particular attention must be given to how less developed partner countries can be supported in benefitting from the circular economy in particular to the ways in which circular economy can contribute to improve labour and social standards worldwide; calls for an assessment of the impact of increased intra-EU recycling rates on countries strongly relying on waste imports.
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of transparent and reliable information on product characteristics for consumers, businesses and market surveillance authorities, and welcomes the Commission’s intention to develop a digital product passport; calls, in this regard, for mandatory information requirements to apply throughout the supply chain, covering not only aspects such as durability and reparability, but also social, working and environmental conditions;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. CallsRegrets that public authorities do not make use of the existing possibilities for green and social procurement under the current legislative framework and still apply too often the lowest price criterion only; calls therefore for a revision of EU public procurement legislation introducing mandatory minimum targets, through defining a certain percentage for procurement based on environmental, social and ethical criteria, and introducing a hierarchy of award criteria, together with sector-specific targets., including for the purchase of second-hand, recycled and reconditioned products; asks also public authorities to lead by example by not purchasing single-use products; Adds that sustainable procurement should become the default choice with a “comply or explain” clause allowing for exemptions only on objective and justified grounds;
2020/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the Commission’s initiatives to support European SMEs’ access to international markets; stresses, however, that SMEs have to deal with too many regulations and burdens and excessive bureaucracy; stresses thaCalls for a massive and consistent EU industrial strategy, in line with the Green Deal, to transform our economies and strengthen its resilience through the pooling of strategic investments to support SMEs, are kept at a competitive disadvantage by investing in climate neutrality to comply with the Green Dealnd increase job opportunities and skills to mitigate the impact of the COVID crisis on workers, consumers and families while trstaying to remain competitive and thriveing on export markets;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to focus on domestic productivity within Europe, in order to establish less dependence on vulnerable supply chains in coreinvestments to be prioritized into the Green Deal, the digital agenda and achieving European sovereignty indu stryategic sectors such as the tech and telecommunications, medical products and pharmaceuticals sectors, especially in times of global crisis, and to remain competitive on the global market, with a consistent industrial strategy and while shortening and diversifying supply chains and reorienting trade policies;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Reiterates its strong support for the goal outlined in the Commission’s Green Deal regarding the introduction of a Carbon Border Adjustment mechanism; calls on the Commission to bring this reform forward as part of the Commission Work Program for 2020; underlines that all reorientations in the EU trade policy must be consistent with the EU’s industrial strategy under the prerogative of realizing the Green Deal;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Insists that the EU industrial strategy shall be inclusive and transparent encompassing all actors operating along the entire value chain from the smallest start-ups to the largest companies, from academia to research, service providers to suppliers, but also trade unions and consumers organisations.
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Supports, in principle, the initiatives to reinforce athe rule-based multilateral trading system; expresses, make its concern, however, about the functioning of the WTO, owing to somesistent with global efforts to halt climate change and biodiversity loss, and prevent strong international actors to abusinge their market power;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to work towards effective and opreconsider the international procurement that allows the EU to take swift, targeted and compelling measures and increase leverage to negotiate reciprocity and market openingdimension of its public procurement policy with regard to goals defined in the Green Deal, such as advancing a circular economy, increasing the resilience of supply chains for public goods, and facilitating local production through a Buy European Act;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the reinforcement of the safeguard instruments in order to make them more efficient and better adapted to protect European industry and to tackle market distortions effectively provoked by unjustified state aid in third countries for lowering factor costs of production not in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, the SDGs or efforts to mitigate the impact of the COVID crisis;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission to urgently amend the EU Steel Safeguard, taking into account the current COVID-19 context, to defend the steel sector against persistent global overcapacity and unfair trading practices and to guarantee effective competition;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to consider the urgentstrike a balance between the enforcement of intellectual property rights and the involvement of all actors in the fight against infringement and counterfeiting as key objecencouraging innovation, ensuring access to medicine and protecting public health; underlines that the flexibilitives of the intellectual property action planprovided in the TRIPS agreement should be used to address potential supply shortages in medicines;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the EU is a leading global exporter of pharmaceutical products; notes that the protection and enforcement of IP rights in free trade agreements (FTAs) and at the WTO is crucial to the development of newa balance must be struck between encouraging innovation, ensuring access to medicines, and treatmentsprotecting public health; underlines that the flexibilities provided in the TRIPS agreement canshould be used to address potential supply shortages in exceptional circumstances;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that a broad network of FTAs together with a functioning multilateral trading system constitute the best way of guaranteeing that multiple sources of manufacturing for essential medicines are available and regulatory standards converge globallykeeping all options open to ensure the adequate availability of needed pharmaceuticals, including by authorising the import of medicines produced abroad under compulsory licenses, is the best way of guaranteeing that multiple sources of manufacturing for essential medicines are available and regulatory standards converge globally; calls on the EU to provide for exception clauses in European rules on data- and market exclusivity so that Member States can effectively use compulsory licenses;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly encourages all countries to joinTakes notes of recent proposals to extend the scope of the WTO’s Pharmaceutical Tariff Elimination Agreement; calls for its scope to be extended to allfuture negotiations to respect the policy space of all countries in order to ensure their strategic autonomy and the access of their citizens to pharmaceutical and medicinal products; stresses that medical products should be exempted from retaliation in trade disputes;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that a complete repatriation of medical supply chains is not possible in a global economy; urges the Commission and the Member States to work with the EU’s partners, the WHO and WTO, on establishing an international framework that can prevent the breakdown of supply chains and limit resort to protectionistdamaging measures during health crises.
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that the future agreement should include reciprocal arrangements on mutually beneficial market access for goods and services, public procurement and recognition of professional qualifications provided that there is a level playing-field;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that under no circumstance a third country can have the same rights or enjoy the same benefits as a Member State; recalls, therefore, that a balanced, ambitious and wide-ranging free trade agreement can only be agreed if a level playing field is secured through robust commitments and equivalent standards in environmental, health, labour and social protection, and competition policies with a view to dynamic alignment ;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that dynamic regulatory alignment on the market surveillance of products and robust product standards should be an essential and irreplaceable part of any future agreement so as to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses and a high level of protection for EU consumers through effective market surveillance and enhanced cooperation between market surveillance authorities; underlines that a level playing field requires a horizontal mechanism, such as an overall governance framework covering all areas of cooperation, to ensure effective implementation, enforcement and dispute settlement through adequately resourced domestic authorities and effective administrative and judicial proceedings; recalls that such a governance mechanism should fully preserve the autonomy of the EU’s decision-making and legal order;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that in any event a new agreement will lead to customs checks and verification before goods enter the internal market and insists that safeguarding the compliance of goods with internal market rules is of the utmost importance to preserve consumer safety and interests; considers that operational procedures aimed at safeguarding the internal market for goods and the customs union must keep ‘red tape’ to a minimum, especially for SMEsbe proportionate;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that ambitious arrangements should be included to facilitate electronic commerce and data flows, to address unjustified barriers to trade by electronic means, and to ensure an open, secure and trustworthy online environment for businesses and consumers, safeguarding consumers’ rights with particular attention to data privacy and protection;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights that any future agreement should establish comprehensive customs cooperation mechanisms to facilitate cross-border trade; stresses furthermore that any future agreement should foresee cooperation mechanisms between customs and market surveillance authorities to uphold the safety of consumers;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that the EU consumer protection standards and citizens’ rights under the EU acquis must not be negatively affectbe preserved by any future agreement;
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #

2020/2023(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses the importance of regulatory cooperation, such as occurs with other third countrie provided that there is adequate parliamentary oversight and non-regression commitments, in order to tackle non-tariff barriers and to pursue objectives of public interest, so as to protect the interests of EU consumers including to ensure a secure and trustworthy environment for consumers and businesses online, as well as to combat unfair commercial practices.
2020/04/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Batteries are thus an important source of energy and one of the key enablers for sustainable development, green mobility, clean energy and climate neutrality. It is expected that the demand for batteries will grow rapidly in the coming years, notably for electric road transport vehicles using batteries for traction, making this market an increasingly strategic one at the global level. Significant scientific and technical progress in the field of battery technology will continue. In view of the strategic importance of batteries, and to provide legal certainty, and incentives to produce low carbon batteries to all operators involved and to avoid discrimination, barriers to trade and distortions on the market for batteries, it is necessary to set out rules on sustainability parameters, performance, safety, collection, recycling and second life of batteries as well as on information to consumers and economic operators about batteries. It is necessary to create a harmonised regulatory framework for dealing with the entire life cycle of batteries that are placed on the market in the Union.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Batteries placed on the Union market should be durable and highly performant. It is therefore necessary to set out performance and durability parameters for portable batteries of general use, as well as for rechargeable industrial batteries and electric vehicle batteries. For electric vehicle batteries, the informal UNECE Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment is developing in-vehicle durability requirements, so this Regulation is refraining from setting additional durability requirements. On the other hand, in the area of batteries for energy storage, existing measurement methods to test battery performance and durability are not considered sufficiently precise and representative to enable introducing minimum requirements. The introduction of minimum requirements related to performance and durability of these batteries should be accompanied by available adequate harmonised standards or common specifications.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) In order to ensure that portable batteries incorporated into appliances and light means of transport are subject to proper separate collection, treatment and high quality recycling once they have become waste, provisions to ensure their removability and replaceability in such appliancesequipment are necessary. Used batteries should also be replaceable so as to prolong the expected lifetime of the appliances they are part ofequipment they are part of. For portable batteries, including battery powering light means of transport, end users should be able to replace the battery themselves. Bigger batteries should only be replaceable by professionals, for safety reasons. The right to repair an equipment by replacing the battery must be effective: end users must be able to purchase a spare battery, and the compatible spare battery must be recognised by the equipment. Software, permanent glue or other technical means to impede the right to repair shall not be used. The general provisions of this Regulation may be complemented with requirements set up for particular products powered by batteries under implementing measures under Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council33 . Where other Union legislation lays down more specific requirements, for safety reasons, regarding the removal of batteries from products (e.g. toys), those specific rules should apply. _________________ 33Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)
(26 a) The right to repair is essential to prolong the life of batteries. Batteries can be repaired by professional repairers. Repaired batteries need standardised non- destructive performance and safety testing, separate from the tests required for new batteries. Professional repairers must be able to open battery packs, exchange defective modules, connectors or fuses. To ensure the safety of repaired batteries, professional repairers need access to data from the battery management system. Professional repairers should be defined as distributors, with the associated obligations.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 b (new)
(26 b) In order to further reduce waste, the interroperability of batteries, of connectors and of chargers across product types should be promoted in product specific ecodesign implementing legislation, and in the upcoming sustainable product policy.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 134 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In order to provide end users with transparent, reliable and clear information about batteries and their main characteristics, and waste batteries, to enable the end users to make informed decisions when buying and discarding batteries and to enable waste operators to appropriately treat waste batteries, batteries should be labelled. Batteries should be labelled with all the necessary information concerning their main characteristics, including their capacity and content of certain hazardous substances. To ensure the availability of information over time, that information should also be made available by means of QR codes. The QR code printed or engraved on all batteries should give access the battery's unique product passport.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 139 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Information about the performance of batteries is essential to ensure that end- users as consumers are well and timely informed and in particular that they have a common basis to compare different batteries before making their purchase. Therefore, portable batteries of general use and automotive, including batteries powering light means of transport, automotive batteries and rechargeable industrial batteries should be marked with a label containing the information on their minimum average duration when used in specific applications. Additionally, it is important to guide the end-user to discard waste batteries in an appropriate way.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) RBatteries powering light means of transport, rechargeable industrial batteries and electric-vehicle batteries with internal storage with a capacity above 2 kWh should contain a battery management system that. It shall stores data so that the state of health and expected lifetime of batteries may be determined at any time by the end- user or any other third party acting on his behalf. In order to repurpose or remanufacture a battery, access to the battery management system should be provided to the person that has purchased the battery or any third party acting on its behalf at any time for evaluating the residual value of the battery, facilitating the reuse, repurposing or remanufacturing of the battery and for making the battery available to independent aggregators, as defined in Directive (EU) 201/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council34 , which operate virtual power plants in electricity grids. This requirement should apply in addition to Union law on type of approval of vehicles, including technical specifications that may originate from the work of the informal UNECE Working Group on Electric Vehicles and the Environment on data access in electric vehicles. _________________ 34Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 125)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) A number of product-specific requirements under this Regulation, including on performance, durability, repurposing and safety, should be measured by using reliable, accurate and reproducible methods that take into account the generally recognised state-of- the-art measurements and calculation methodologies. In order to ensure that there are no barriers to trade on the internal market, standards should be harmonised at Union level. Such methods and standards should, to the extent possible, take into account the real-life usage of batteries, reflect the average range of consumer behaviour and be robust in order to deter intentional and unintentional circumvention. Repaired and repurposed batteries require a separate set of standardised non-destructive safety tests. Once a reference to such a standard has been adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council35 and published in the Official Journal of the European Union, presumption of conformity shall be established with those product-specific requirements adopted on the basis of this Regulation, provided that the outcome of such methods demonstrate that the minimum values established for those substantive requirements are attained. In the absence of published standards at the time of the application of product-specific requirements, the Commission should adopt common specifications through implementingdelegated acts and the compliance with such specifications should also give rise to the presumption of conformity. In cases where the common specifications are, at a later stage, found to have shortcomings, the Commission should by implementingdelegated act amend or repeal the common specifications in question. _________________ 35 Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) The chosen modules do not however reflect certain specific aspects of batteries and thus, it is necessary to adapt the modules chosen for the conformity assessment procedure. In order to take account of the novelty and complexity of the sustainability, safety and labelling requirements set out in this Regulation and for the purpose of ensuring the conformity of batteries placed on the market with the legal requirements, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the conformity assessment procedures by adding verifications steps or changing assessment module, on the basis of developments on the battery market or in the battery value chain. Robust conformity assessment procedures are needed to ensure conformity with environmental obligations, and supply chain due diligence obligations contained in this regulation.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 157 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) In the interests of facilitating and accelerating the conformity assessment procedure, the certification and ultimately the market access and in view of the novelty and complexity of the sustainability, safety and labelling requirements for batteries, it is crucial that notified bodies have continuous access to all testing equipment and testing facilities needed and that they apply the procedures without creating unnecessary burdens for economic operators. To ensure the proper application of this regulation, the Commission should designate a Union Testing Facility in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. For the same reason, and to ensure equal treatment of economic operators, it is necessary that the notified bodies apply the conformity assessment procedures consistently.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 160 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) The Commission should enable appropriate coordination and cooperation between notified bodies, and market surveillance authorities.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45 a (new)
(45 a) Consumers and consumers organisations should have a direct way to report non-compliance with this regulation to market surveillance authorities.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48 a (new)
(48 a) A large number of non-compliant batteries and electronic equipment containing batteries enter the internal market via economic operators using online market places. Batteries that do not comply with the law pose a major safety risk, and are potentially life-threatening. Economic operators using online market places also routinely avoid paying disposal fees, and therefore threaten the financing and functioning of the system. These problems should be addressed in the Digital Services Act (Regulation .../...) and in the revision of the General Product Safety Directive (Directive (EU).../...). The Commission shall review in accordance with article 77 of this regulation whether legislative and non-legislative measures in place after the entry into force of the Digital Services Act (Regulation .../...) and in the revision of the General Product Safety Directive (Directive (EU).../...) significantly curb the widespread availability of non-compliant batteries on the internal market. If appropriate the Commission shall then draw a legislative proposal amending article 43 and 45 of this regulation.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 164 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) It is necessary to ensure that batteries from third countries entering the Union market comply with the requirements of this Regulation, whether imported as self-standing batteries or contained in products, and in particular that appropriate conformity assessment procedures have been carried out by manufacturers with regard to those batteries. Provision should therefore be made for importers to make sure that the batteries they place on the market and put into service comply with the requirements of this Regulation and that the CE marking on batteries and documentation drawn up by manufacturers are available for inspection by the national authorities. Special attention should be given to the robustness and independence of the third party auditing of requirements of this regulation relating to the production process of batteries. This includes the respect of the carbon footprint declaration, recycled content, as well as to human rights and environmental due diligence obligations.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) When placing a battery on the market or putting it into service, every importer should indicate on the battery the importer’s name, registered trade name or registered trade mark as well as the postal address and other contact details. Exceptions should be provided for in cases where the size of the battery does not allow it. This includes cases where the importer would have to open the packaging to put the name and address on the battery or where the battery is too small in size to affix this information..
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) Any importer or distributor that either places a battery on the market or puts it into service under the importer’s or distributor’s own name or trademark or modifies a battery in such a way that compliance with the requirements of this Regulation may be affected or modifies the purpose of a battery that is already place on the market should be considered to be the manufacturer and should assume the obligations of the manufacturer. For batteries mandated to have a battery passport, information about the economic operator assuming the obligations of the manufacturer should be updated accordingly.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) Ensuring traceability of a battery throughout the whole supply chain helps to make market surveillance simpler and more efficient, and gives transparency to consumers. An efficient traceability system facilitates the market surveillance authorities' task of tracing economic operators who placed on the market or made available on the market or put into service non-compliant batteries. The economic operators should therefore be required to keep the information on their transactions of batteries for a certain period of time, and to make them available in the battery passport when appropriate.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 59
(59) Only few countries supply those materials and, in some cases, low standards of governance may exacerbate environmental and social problems. Both cobalt and nickel, copper, nickel, iron and bauxite mining and refining are related to a large range of social and environmental issues, including environmental hazard potential and human health. While the social and environmental impacts for natural graphite are less severe, its mining has high shares of artisanal and small scale operations, which mostly takes place in informal settings and can lead to serious health and environmental impacts, including no regular mine closure and no rehabilitation, which results in the destruction of ecosystems and soils. For lithium, the expected increase in its use in battery manufacturing is likely to put additional pressure on extraction and refining operations, what would recommend including lithium in the scope of the supply chain due diligence obligations. The expected massive increase in demand for batteries in the Union should not contribute to an increase of such environmental and social risks.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 175 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62
(62) The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises stipulate that economic operators should carry out due diligence as a means to meet their corporate responsibility with respect to human rights and the environment. In the Union, general requirements on due diligence in relation to certain minerals and metals were introduced by Regulation (EU) No 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 . That Regulation does not, however, address the minerals and materials used for battery production. _________________ 39Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas (OJ L 130, 19.5.2017, p. 1)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 176 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
(63) Therefore, corporate responsibility to respect human rights, social rights, human health and the environment should apply to all operations and business relationships of an economic operator throughout the value chain. As the extraction, processing and trading of certain raw materials that are used in the battery manufacturing carry particular risks, and in view of the expected exponential growth in battery demand in the EU, therequirements with regard to due diligence by economic operators that places a batteryies on the EU market should be set up a supply chain due diligence policy. The requirements therefore should be laid down, with the objective to address the social and environmental risks inherent in the extraction, processing and trading of certain raw materials for battery manufacturing purposes, the manufacturing itself as well as allrelevant downstream operations.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 177 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64
(64) When putting in place aconducting risk-based due diligence policy, it should be based on internationally recognised due diligence principles in instruments such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights1a, the Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact40 , the Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products41 , the ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy42 , the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises1b, and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct (RBC)43 , which reflect a common understanding amongst governments and stakeholders, and should be tailored to the specific context and circumstances of each economic operator. In relation to the extraction, processing and trading of natural mineral resources used for battery production, the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas44 (‘OECD Due Diligence Guidance’) represents a long-standing effort by governments and stakeholders to establish goon internationally acknowledged standard addressing specific risks of gross human rights' violations related to the sourcing and ptractice in this area. _________________ding of certain raw materials in the context of conflict. _________________ 1a United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human, available at https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publica tions/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf 1bOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/guidelines/ 40The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, available at https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is- gc/mission/principles 41UNEP Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, available at https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/12/2009%20- %20Guidelines%20for%20sLCA%20- %20EN.pdf 42Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, available at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public /---ed_emp/---emp_ent/--- multi/documents/publication/wcms_09438 6.pdf 43OECD (2018), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/OECD-Due- Diligence-Guidance-for-Responsible- Business-Conduct.pdf 44OECD (2016), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Third Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252479-en.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
(65) According to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance45 se standards, due diligence is an on-going, proactive and reactive process through which companies can ensure that they respect human rights and the environment and do not contribute to conflict.46 . Risk-based due diligence refers to the steps companies should take to identify and address actual or potential risks in order tocease, prevent or, mitigate and account for adverse impacts associated with their activities or sourcing decisions. Economic operators should conduct informed, effective and meaningful consultation with actually and potentially affected rights-holders. A company can assess risk posed by its activities and relationships and adopt risks mitigating measures in line with relevant standards provided under national and international law, recommendations on responsible business conduct by international organisations, government- backed tools, private sector voluntary initiatives and a company's internal policies and systems. This approach also helps to scale the due diligence exercise to the size of the company's activities or supply chain relationships. _________________ 45 Page 15 of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. 46OECD (2011), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, OECD, Paris; OECD (2006), OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones, OECD, Paris; and, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (Report of the Special Represantative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie, A/HRC/17/31, 21 March 2011).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65 a (new)
(65 a) While private sector due diligence schemes can support economic operators in their due diligence, economic operators retain individual responsibility to comply with the due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 180 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 66
(66) Mandatory supplyvalue chain due diligence policies should be adopted or modified and address, at least, the most prevalent social and environmental risk categories. This should cover the current and foreseeable impacts, on one hand, on social life, in particular human rights, human health and safety as well as occupational health and safety and labour rights, and, on the other hand, on the environment, in particular on water use, soil protection, air pollution, climate change and biodiversity, including community life.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 181 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
(67) As regards the social risk categories, due diligence policies should address the risks in the battery supply chain in relation to the protection of human rights, including human health, the rights of indigenous people, protection of children and gender equality, in line with international human rights law47 . The due diligence policies should include information on how the economic operator has contributed to the prevention of human rights abuses and on the instruments in place with the operator’s business structure to fight corruption and bribery. The due diligence policies should also ensure correct implementation of the rules of fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation48 as listed in Annex I of the ILO Tripartite Declaration. _________________ 47Including The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 48 The eight fundamental Conventions are 1. Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), 2. Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), 3. Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) (and its 2014 Protocol ), 4. Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105), 5. Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), 6. Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), 7. Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100), 8. Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 182 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
(68) As regards the environmental risk categories, the due diligence policies should address the risks in the battery supply chain in relation to protection of the natural environment, the climate in line with the UN Paris Agreement, and of the biological diversity in line with the Convention on Biological Diversity49 , which includes also the consideration of local communities, and the protection and the development of those communities. _________________ 49 Such as set out in the Convention on biological diversity, available at https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/ and, in particular, Decision COP VIII/28 “Voluntary guidelines on Biodiversity- Inclusive impact assessment, available at https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=1104 2.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 183 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
(69) The supplyvalue chain due diligence obligations on the identification and mitigation of social and environmental risks associated with raw materials going into battery manufacturing should contribute to the implementation of UNEP Resolution 19 on Mineral Resource Governance, which recognizes the important contribution of the mining sector towards the achievement of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69 a (new)
(69 a) Even when due diligence has been carried out, harm might occur. Economic operators should actively engage in remediation for such harm, by itself or in cooperation with other actors. They should be liable for adverse impact they or the entities they control or are able to control caused or contributed to. Those adversely impacted should be entitled to remediation and should be provided access to justice.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
(70) Other EU legislative instruments that lay down requirements regarding supplyvalue chain due diligence should apply in so far as there are no specific provisions with the same objective, nature and effect in this Regulation which may be adapted in the light of future legislative amendments.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) In order to adapt to developments in the battery value chain, including to changes in the scope and nature of the relevant environmental and social risks, as well as to technical and scientific progress in batteries and battery chemistries, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the list of raw materials and risk categories and the supplyvalue chain due diligence requirements.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 89
(89) Producers and distributors should be actively involved in providing information to end users that batteries should be collected separately, that collection schemes are available and that end users have an important role in ensuring an environmentally optimal management of waste batteries. The disclosure of information to all end users as well as reporting on batteries should make use of modern information technologies. The information should be provided either by classical means, such as outdoors, posters and social media campaigns, orand by more innovative means, such as electronic access to websites provided by QR codes affixed to the battery.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 195 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 99
(99) Public procurement constitutes an important sector with regard to reducing the impacts on the environment of human activities and to stimulate market transformation towards more sustainable products. Contracting authorities, as defined in Directive 2014/24/EU63 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council64 , and contracting entities as defined in Directive 2014/25/EU shouldmust take account of the environmental impacts when procuring batteries or products containing batteries, in order to promote and stimulate the market for clean and energy-efficient mobility and energy-storage and thus contribute to the environment, climate and energy policy objectives of the Union. _________________ 63Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65) 64 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 106
(106) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and ensure that those rules are enforced. The penalties provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The Commission shall review the penalties established by the Member States and propose possible changes to them, when necessary, in view of ensuring an harmonised enforcement across the Union.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)
(20 a) ‘battery removability and replaceability’ means non-destructive disassembly, or reversible extraction of the battery pack or modules from the device or constituent components without functional damage that would preclude reassembly or reuse.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 208 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) ‘QR code’ means a matrix barcode that links to information about a battery model;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36
(36) ‘supply chain due diligence’ means the obligations of the economic operator which places a rechargeable industrial battery or an electric-vehicle battery on the market, in relation to its management system, risk management, third party verifications by notified bodies and disclosure of information with a view to identifying, preventing and addressing actual and potential risks linked to the sourcing, processing and trading of the raw materials required for battery manufacturing; , chemical and secondary raw materials required for battery manufacturing, linked to its manufacturing operations and linked to all business relationships;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 220 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40
(40) ‘reuse of a battery’ means the complete or partial direct re-use of the battery for the original purpose the battery was designed for;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – title
Performance and durability requirements for portable batteries of general use, including batteries powering light means of transport
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2020/0353(COD)

1. From 1 January 20275, portable batteries of general use shall, including batteries powering light means of transport, meet the values for the electrochemical performance and durability parameters set out in Annex III as laid down in the delegated act adopted by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 2.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By 31 December 2025, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 73 to supplement this Regulation by establishing minimum values for the electrochemical performance and durability parameters laid down in Annex III that portable batteries of general use shall attain.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 240 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In preparing the delegated act referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall consider the need to reduce the life cycle environmental impact of portable batteries of general use and take into consideration relevant international standards and labelling schemes. The Commission shall also ensure thattake into account the impact of the provisions laid down by that delegated act do not have a significant negative impact on the functionality of those batteries or the appliances into which those batteries are incorporated, the affordability and the cost for end-users and the industry’s competitiveness. No excessive administrative burden shall be imposed on manufacturers of the batteries and the appliances concerned.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 252 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By 1 January 2026, the real-life performance and durability of rechargeable industrial batteries and electric vehicle batteries shall be available via the publicly available part of the electronic exchange system as set out in Article 64 and Annex XIII.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 258 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Removability, replaceability and replaceairability of portable batteries, including batteries powering light means of transport
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 263 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Portable batteries incorporated in appliances and light means of transport, shall be readily removable and replaceable by the end-user or by independent operators during the lifetime of the appliance, if the batteries have a shorter lifetime than the appliance, or at the latest at the end of the lifetime of the appliance.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A battery is readily replaceable where, after its removal from an appliance or light mean of transport, it can be substituted by a similcompatible spare battery by professional repairers and end users, without affecting the functioning or the performance of that appliance or light mean of transport. The replacement shall be possible using basic tools, as defined in standard EN45554:2020.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 269 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Portable batteries, including batteries powering light means of transport, shall be available as spare part of the equipment they power, for a minimum of 10 years after placing the last unit of the model on the market, with a reasonable and non-discriminatory price for independant personnel and end users. The manufacturer shall ensure the delivery of the spare battery within 15 working days after having received the order.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 b (new)
Detailed instructions for end users to safely remove and replace portable batteries, including battery powering light means of transport, must be made available by the manufacturer, on paper with the new equipment, and permanently online on their website.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 c (new)
Software shall not be used to impinge the replacement of a portable battery or of their key components with another compatible battery or key components.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 d (new)
Batteries powering light means of transport shall be designed so that the replacement of modules or other key components of the battery can be done without destroying the battery.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) continuity of power supply is necessary and a permanent connection between the appliance and the portable battery is required for safety, performance, medical or data integrity reasons;, or
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 276 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the functioning of the battery is only possible when the battery is integrated into the structure of the appliance.deleted
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 279 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) For products falling under the exemptions in paragraph 2, clear product information should illustrate to consumers that the device contains a non- replaceable battery.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 282 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a Removability and replaceability of EV and industrial batteries and of key components enabling their use 1. EV batteries shall be removable and replaceable by professional repairers. 2. EV and industrial batteries shall be modular in design so that the control electronics or battery modules can be replaced by accredited professional repairers. 3. EV and industrial batteries shall be designed so that the replacement of modules or other key components like connectors or fuse can be done without destroying the battery. 3. Detailed instructions for professional repairers to safely remove and replace EV batteries or battery modules must be made available by the manufacturer, on paper with the new vehicle, and permanently online on the EV producer’s website. 4. Detailed instructions for professional repairers to safely remove and replace key components of industrial batteries or modules composing an industrial battery must be made available by the manufacturer, on paper with the new industrial battery, and permanently online on the producers' website. 5. Software must not be used to impinge the replacement of a EV or industrial battery or their key components with another compatible battery or key components.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 285 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 b (new)
Article 11 b Safety of repaired batteries 1. The safety of repaired batteries shall be assessed based on non destructive tests adapted to them. 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to define the appropriate testing methods to ensure the safety of repaired batteries. 3. Professional repairers carrying out repair of batteries shall ensure that the examination, performance testing, packing and shipment of batteries and their components is carried out following adequate quality control and safety instructions.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 292 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. Labels and QR code referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5 shall be printed or engraved visibly, legibly and indelibly on the battery. Where this is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature and size of the battery, labels shall be affixed to the packaging and to the documents accompanying the battery. For portable batteries, including batteries powering light means of transport, industrial batteries and EV batteries, the QR code shall provide access to the battery passport as described in Article 65.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 296 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Rechargeable industrial batteries and, electric vehicle batteries with internal storage and a capacity above 2 kWh, as well as portable batteries powering light means of transport shall include a battery management system containing data on the parameters for determining the state of health and expected lifetime of batteries as laid down in Annex VII.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 307 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Batteries which are tested following harmonised standards or parts thereof, or common specifications as referred to in Article 16, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements referred to in Articles 9, 10, 13 and 59(5)(a) to the extent that those requirements are covered by such harmonised standards, or common specifications referred to in Article 16.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 312 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Batteries which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof, or common specifications referred to in Article 16, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements set out in Article 12 to the extent that those requirements are covered by such harmonised standards or common specification.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) In the Commission observes undue delays in the adoption of requested harmonised standards, orabsence of published standards at the time of the application of product-specific requirements, or if the Commission considers that relevant harmonised standards are not sufficient; or
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 325 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In cases where the common specifications are found to have shortcomings, the Commission should by delegated act amend or repeal the common specifications in question.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 334 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Conformity assessment of batteries with the requirements set out in Articles 6, 9, 10, 11, 121, 13 and 14 shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in Part A of Annex VIII.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 336 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Conformity assessment of batteries with requirements set out in Articles 7, 8, 10, 12 and 39 shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in Part B of Annex VIII.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 372 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Where a conformity assessment body demonstrates its conformity with the criteria laid down in the relevant harmonised standards or parts thereof, or in the common specifications referred to in Article 16, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union it shall be presumed to comply with the requirements set out in Article 25 in so far as the applicable harmonised standards or common specifications cover those requirements.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 392 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 8
8. Manufacturers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, contact email and phone number, as well and the postal address and web address at which they can be contacted on the packaging of the battery. The postal address shall indicate a single point at which the manufacturer can be contacted. Such information shall be in a language easily understood by end-users and market surveillance authorities and shall be clear, understandable and legible.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 394 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – title
39 Obligation for economic operators that place rechargeable industrial batteries and electric-vehicle batteries with internal storage and a capacity above 2 kWh on the market to establish supply chain due diligence policiesbatteries on the market to conduct value chain due diligence ((Horizontal amendment: the extension of the scope of due diligence to all economic operators should apply throughout the text.))
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 398 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
1. As of [12 months after the entry into force of the Regulation] the economic operator that places rechargeable industrial batteries and electric-vehicle batteries with internal storage and a capacity above 2 kWhbatteries on the market shall comply with the supplyvalue chain due diligence obligations set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article and shall keep documentation demonstrating its respective compliance with those obligations, including the results of the third-party verification carried out by notified bodies.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 406 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) adopt, and clearly communicate to suppliers and the public, a company policy for the supplyvalue chain of raw materials indicated in Annex X, point 1;for the manufacturing of batteries, including raw materials and secondary raw materials indicated in Annex X, point 1, as well as hazardous chemicals; ((Horizontal amendment that should apply throughout the whole text.))
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 408 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) adopt, and clearly communicate to the public, a company policy for the manufacturing of batteries and all related business operations;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 409 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) incorporate in its supply chaindue diligence policy standards consistent with the standards set out in the model supply chain policy in Annex II to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights1a and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises1b in order to identify, prevent,address and mitigate adverse impacts; _________________ 1a https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publica tions/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf 1b https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/4800 4323.pdf ((Horizontal amendment that should apply throughout the text.))
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 412 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) structure its respective internal management systems to support supplyvalue chain due diligence by assigning responsibility to senior management to oversee the supplyvalue chain due diligence process as well as maintain records of those systems for a minimum of five years;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 414 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point d – introductory part
(d) establish and operate a system of controls and transparency over the supply chain, including a chain of custody or traceability system or the identification ofidentifying upstream actors in the supply chain.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 420 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point d – paragraph 2
The requirements set out in the current point (d) may be implemented through participation in industry-led schemes.deleted
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 422 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) incorporate its supplyvalue chain policy into contracts and agreements with suppliers, including their risk management measures;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 423 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) establish a grievance mechanism as an early-warning risk-awareness systeand remediation mechanism or provide such mechanisms through collaborative arrangements with other economic operators or organisations, or by facilitating recourse to an external expert or body, such as an ombudsman. Such mechanism should comply with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 425 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(f a) consult with potentially affected right holders and non-governmental organisations active in the field for the establishment of the grievance mechanism and report about this in a transparent manner;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 426 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) identify and assess the adverse impacts associated to the risk categories listed in Annex X, point 2, in its supply chain on the basis of the information provided pursuant to paragraph 2value chain, including related to the use of energy, materials and chemicals, and including emissions, discharges and losses of hazardous substances as well as waste treatment operations, on the basis of the information provided pursuant to paragraph 2 and any other relevant information that is either publicly available or provided by stakeholders, including potentially affected communities and relevant civil society organisations, against the standards of their supplyvalue chain policy;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 428 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part
(b) implement a strategy to respond to the identified risks designed so as to prevent or, mitigate and address adverse impacts by:
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 429 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i
(i) reporting findings of the supplyvalue chain risk assessment to senior management designated for that purpose;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii
(ii) adopting risk management measures consistent with Annex II to the OECD Dinternationally recognised due Ddiligence Guidance, considering their ability to influence, standards listed in Annex X, point 3,and where necessary take steps to exert pressure on supplierbusiness relationships who can most effectively prevent or mitigate the identified risk;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 433 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
(iii) implementing the risk management plan, monitoring and tracking performance of risk mitigation efforts, reporting back to senior management designated for this purpose and considering suspending or discontinuing engagement with a supplierbusiness relationship after failed attempts at mitigation, based on relevant contractual arrangements in line with the second subparagraph to paragraph 2 above;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
If the economic operator referred to in paragraph 1 pursues risk mitigation efforts while continuing trade or temporarily suspending trade, it shall consult with suppliers and with the stakeholders concerned, including local and central government authorities, international or civil society organisations and affected third parpotentially affected communities, and agree on a strategy for measurable risk mitigation in the risk management plan.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 437 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The economic operator referred to in paragraph 1 shall identify and assess the probability of adverse impacts in the risk categories listed in Annex X, point 2, in its supply chain based on available reports by third-party verification done by a notified body concerning the suppliers in that chain, and, by assessing, as appropriate, its due diligence practices. Those verification reports shall be in accordance with the first subparagraph in paragraph 4. In the absence of such third-party verification reports concerning suppliers, the economic operator referred to in paragraph 1 shall identify and assess the risks in its supply chain as part of its own risk management systems. In such cases, economic operators referred to in paragraph 1 shall carry outvalue chain. The economic operator referred to in paragraph 1 may make use of third -party verifications of its own supply chains due diligence via a notified body in accordance with the first subparagraph in paragraph 4 reports for that purpose.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 439 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The economic operator referred to in paragraph 1 shall have their value chain due diligence policies and processes supervised and verified by the relevant competent national authority which shall: (a) supervise whether economic operators comply with their due diligence requirements as set out in this Regulation; (b) include in its supervision all activities, processes and systems used by economic operators to implement their value chain due diligence requirements in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3 and 5; as well as, where relevant, carry out checks on undertakings and interviews with affected or potentially affected stakeholders or their representatives; (c) have as its objective the determination of conformity of the value chain due diligence practices of economic operators placing batteries on the market with paragraphs 2, 3 and 5; (d) make recommendations to the economic operators that place batteries on the market on how to improve their supply chain due diligence practices; (e) respect the audit principles of independence, competence and accountability, as set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance; (f) may order the temporary suspension of activities or a ban on the operation in the internal market, if the failure to comply with this Regulation could directly lead to irreparable harm. (If this amendment is adopted, Article 39(4) of the Commission proposal should be deemed to be deleted.)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 445 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
(a a) Amend the list of international instruments in Annex X in view of international progress;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 446 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 8 – point a b (new)
(a b) The Commission shall, no later than [12 months after the entry into force of the Regulation], adopt an delegated act establishing the format for the social and environmental risk categories indicated in Annex X, point 2. That delegated act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article74(3).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 472 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 4
4. Distributors that supply batteries to end-users shall provide in their retail premises, in a visible manner, and through their online marketplaces permanently and in a visible manner the information listed in paragraph 1 and 2, and information on how the end users may return waste batteries free of charge to the respective collection points established at retail outlets or on behalf of a marketplace. That obligation shall be limited to the types of batteries which the distributor or retailer has, or had, as new batteries in its offer.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 482 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2026, each portable battery including batteries powering light means of transport, industrial battery and electric vehicle battery placed on the market or put into service and whose capacity is higher than 2 kWh shall have an electronic record (“battery passport”).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 483 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 2
2. The battery passport shall be unique for each individual battery referred to in paragraph 1 and shall be identified through a unique identifier that the economic operator placing the battery on the market shall attribute to it and which shall be printed or engraved on itaccessible via the QR code described in Article 13 (5) and (6).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 486 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3
3. TFor industrial and EV batteries, the battery passport shall be linked to the information about the basic characteristics of each battery type and model stored in the data sources of the System established pursuant to Article 64. The economic operator that places an industrial battery or an electric vehicle battery on the market shall ensure that the data included in the battery passport is accurate, complete and up-to-date.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. For portable batteries, including batteries powering light means of transport, the battery passport should contain the information described in Article 13 (6) (a) to (d), (i) and (j), and updated information about the battery, linked to changes to its status.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 489 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 4
4. TFor EV and industrial batteries, the battery passport shall be accessible online, and via the QR code described in article 13 (5), through electronic systems interoperable with the System established pursuant to Article 64.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 490 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 5
5. TFor EV and industrial batteries, the battery passport shall allow access to information about the values for performance and durability parameters referred to in Article 10(1), when the battery is placed on the market and when it is subject to changes in its status.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 493 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 6
6. When the change in the status is due to repairing or repurposing activities, the responsibility for the battery record in the battery passport shall be transferred to the economic operator that is considered to place the industrial battery or the electric vehicle battery on the market or that puts it into service.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 494 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementingdelegated acts to establish the rules for accessing, sharing, managing, exploring, publishing and reusing of the information and data accessible through the battery passport.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 497 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Those implementingdelegated acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 74(3).
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 501 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By [two years after the entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission shall adopt an implementing act determining the uniform conditions of checks, criteria for determination of the frequency of checks and amount of samples to be checked in accordance with Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 506 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Consumers shall have the possibility to inform the Commission of batteries presenting a risk to consumer health and safety through a separate section of the Safety Gate portal.The Commission shall take in due consideration the information received and ensure follow up, where appropriate. The Commission, by means of an implementing act, shall adopt the modalities for the sending of information by consumers as well as for the transmission of such information to the concerned national authorities for possible follow up.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 514 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 a (new)
Article 68 a Union testing facility By [two years after the entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission shall designate a Union testing facility specialised in batteries in accordance with Article 21(2), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU)2019/1020.2. The Union testing facility shall serve as a competence centre for carrying out the testing of batteries at the request of market surveillance authorities for the purpose of the evaluation referred to in Article 66(1);
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 522 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States should cooperate in an enforcement network supporting each other in the infringement procedure in case of cross-border sales within the European Union.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 524 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. Contracting authorities, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 3(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, or contracting entities, as defined in Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU shall, when procuring batteries or products containing batteries in situations covered by those Directives, take account of the environmental impacts of batteries over their life cycle with a viewshall give mandatory preference to the best available environmentally friendly batteries, with a view to their entire life cycle, to ensure that such impacts of the batteries procured are kept to a minimum.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 526 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2
2. The obligation set out in paragraph 1 shall apply to any contracts entered into by contracting authorities or contracting entities for the purchase of batteries or products containing batteries and shall mean that these contracting authorities and contracting entities are obliged to include technical specifications and award criteria based on Articles 7 to 101 to ensure that a product is chosen among products with significantly lower environmental impacts over their lifecycle.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 535 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) in Annex I, point 21 of the list of Union harmonisation legislation is replaced by the following: 21. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and waste batteries, amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 540 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 76 – paragraph 1 a (new)
By 1 January 2023, the Commission shall develop harmonised criteria for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties and for compensation of damages to individuals.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 556 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) measures regarding end-of-life management of batteries set out in Chapter VII.,
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 558 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) measures regarding the identification of economic operators set out in Article 45.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 564 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – title
Electrochemical performance and durability parameters for portable batteries of general useincluding batteries powering light means of transport
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 566 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1
1. Battery measured capacity, electric charge which a battery can delivers under a specific set of real life conditions.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 577 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Part C – paragraph 1
The QR code shall be 100% blackin a color with a high contrast compared to its background and of a size that is easily readable by a commonly available QR reader, such as those integrated in hand-held communication devices.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 579 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – Part A – point 1 – paragraph 1
Internal production control is the conformity assessment procedure whereby the manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2, 3 and 4, and ensures and declares that the battery satisfies the requirements set out in Articles 6, 9, 10, 11, 121, 13 and 14 that apply to them.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 583 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VIII – Part B – point 1 – paragraph 1
Internal production control plus supervised verification is the conformity assessment procedure whereby the manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2, 3, 4, and 5, and ensures and declares that the battery satisfy the requirements set out in Articles 7, 8, 10, 12 and 39 that are applicable.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 587 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) copper
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 588 #
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 589 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 1 – point a c (new)
(a c) bauxite
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 599 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) climate, including greenhouse gas emissions;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 602 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 2 – point i a (new)
(i a) community life, including that of indigenous people;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 605 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 3 – point a a (new)
(a a) UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 606 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) The eight fundamental ILO Conventions as defined under the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 607 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 3 – point f
(f) OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk AreaGuidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 608 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex X – point 3 – point f a (new)
(f a) The UN Paris Agreement.
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 626 #

2020/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex XIII – point 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) Status of the battery (first life, waste, repaired, repurposed, recycled)
2021/09/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The increased digitalisation of customs and Union non-customs regulatory formalities applicable to international trade has opened up new opportunities for Member States to improve the digital cooperation between customs and partner competent authorities. In pursuit of those priorities, several Member States have started to develop frameworks for national single window environments for customs. Those initiatives differ substantially depending on the level of existing customs information technology architecture, priorities and cost structures. It is therefore necessary to require Member States to establish and operate national single window environments for customs for Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX. Those environments should constitute the national components of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs, enabling electronic information sharing and collaboration between customs, partner competent authorities and economic operators to ensure compliance with and efficient enforcement of customs legislation and Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX. In line with this objective, the national single window environments for customs should enable the automated verification by customs authorities of formalities in respect of which data is transmitted from the respective Union non-customs system through EU CSW-CERTEX. The national single window environments for customs should also allow partner competent authorities to monitor and control the quantities of authorised goods (‘quantity management’) that have been released by customs through the Union. This should be ensured by providing the necessary clearance information to the Union non- customs systems through EU CSW- CERTEX. In practical terms, quantity management at Union level is necessary to enable a better enforcement of non- customs regulatory formalities by automatically and consistently monitoring the consumption of authorised quantities for the release of goods, avoiding their overuse or mishandling. The relevant non- customs systems listed in Annex I should be developed and integrated by each Member State in its single window environment for customs and should be conducted within a safe and secure environment, protected from cyber threats and using the best available cybersecurity tools, and on the basis of uniform technical specifications provided by the Commission. Those uniform technical specifications should provide common data sets for all applications, declarations and notifications in order to create an interoperable common IT interface solution.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 84 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes a European Union Single Window Environment for Customs that provides an integrated set of interoperable electronic services at Union and national level through the European Union Customs Single Window Certificates Exchange System to support interaction and information exchange between the national single window environments for customs and the Union non-customs systems referred to in thePart A and Part B of Annex I.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) ’FLEGT licence’ means a shipment-based or market participant- based document of a standard format which is to be forgery-resistant, tamper- proof, and verifiable, and which refers to a shipment as being in compliance with the requirements of the FLEGT licensing scheme, duly issued and validated by a partner country’s licensing authority; systems for issuing, recording and communicating such licences may be paper-based or based on electronic means, as appropriate;
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
A European Union Single Window Environment for Customs is hereby established. It shall include the European Union Customs Single Window Certificates Exchange System, national single window environments for customs and the Union non-customs systems referred to in thePart A of Annex I.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 21 amending the lists of Union non-customs systems laid down in Parts A, B and C of Annex I. When adopting those delegated acts, the Commission shall ensure that any system that fulfils the applicable rules laid down in Articles 10 to 15 is added to the list of Part A of Annex I.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter V – title
Costs of EU CSW-CERTEX, work programme, and monitoring, reviewing and reporting
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt a work programme to support the implementation of the provisions of this Regulation related to the connection of the Union non- customs systems referred to in the Annex to EU CSW-CERTEX and the integration of the respective Union non-customs formalities. The work programme shall also include training support for national competent authorities including issuance of guidelines to ensure harmonized implementation across Member States. The work programme shall be kept up to date. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 22(2).
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 135 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – title
Monitoring, reviewing and reporting
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall regularly monitor the functioning of the European Union Single Window Environment for Customs. The Commission shall regularly review the status of the systems listed in Parts B and C of Annex I with a view to assessing their progress towards compliance with the rules laid down in Articles 10 to 15. If the Commission concludes that a system listed in Parts B or C of Annex I complies with the applicable rules laid down in Articles 10 to 15, it shall adopt a delegated act as mentioned in Article 3(1a) integrating the system into Part A of Annex I.
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – subheading 1
ANNEX I: Part A Union non-customs formalities covered by EU CSW-CERTEX
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 145 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
ANNEX I: Part B Systems that may be used on a voluntary basis by Member States and should be connected by 2023 1. Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items 2. Certificate for International trade of endangered species of wild fauna and flora (CITES) 3. Information and communication system for market surveillance (ICSMS) and Rapid Information Exchange System (RAPEX) 4. Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds 5. Import licence for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade. 6. Shipments of waste 7. Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) 8. Prior Informed Consent (PIC)concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals 9. Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing regulation, Catch certificate (EU IUU Catch)
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2020/0306(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I b (new)
ANNEX I: Part C OTHER SYSTEMS Mercury export ban -Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 - Persistent organic pollutants - Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC PIC - Prior Informed Consent - DG ENV/ DG GROW - ePIC (ECHA) - Regulation (EU) ) 649/2012of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals Leghold traps - Council Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91 of 4 November 1991 prohibiting the use of leghold traps in the Community and the introduction into the Community of pelts and manufactured goods of certain wild animal species originating in countries which catch them by means of leghold traps or trapping methods which do not meet international humane trapping; Regulation 35/97 Trade in seal products -Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of16 September 2009 on trade in seal products;; Regulation (EU) 2015/1775 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2015 amending Regulation(EC) No 1007/2009 on trade in seal products and repeal Commission Regulation(EU) No 737/2010 Seal pups - Council Directive 83/129/EEC of 28 March 1983 concerning the importation into Member States of skins of certain seal pups and products derived therefrom IAS - Invasive Alien Species - Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species EU IUU Catch - Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing regulation, Catch certificate - DG MARE Not yet specified - Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC)No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004; Regulation 1010/2009 Catch documentation scheme for Dissostichus spp - Council Regulation (EC) No 1035/2001 of 22 May 2001 establishing a catch documentation scheme for Dissostichus spp Statistical monitoring of trade in swordfish and bigeye tuna - Council Regulation (EC) No 1984/2003 of 8April 2003 introducing a system for the statistical monitoring of trade in swordfish and bigeye tuna within the Community Catch documentation programme for bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus - Regulation (EU) No 640/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 establishing a catch documentation programme for bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus PROTECTION OF HEALTH ANDLIFE OF HUMANS, ANIMALS OR PLANTS Shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel - Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom of 20 November 2006on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel; Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom Cat and dog fur and products containing such fur - Regulation (EC) No 1523/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 banning the placing on the market and the import to, or export from, the Community of cat and dog fur, and products containing such fur Animal by-products not intended for human consumption (ABP) - Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 Personal consignments of products of animal origin - Commission Regulation (EC) No 206/2009 of 5 March 2009 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 Domestic pets - Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013on the non-commercial movement of pet animals and repealing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 Plastic kitchenware from China and Hong Kong - Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2011 of 22 March 2011laying down specific conditions and detailed procedures for the import of polyamide and melamine plastic kitchenware originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and Hong Kong; Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Art. 48(1) Prohibition of Bisphenol A in polycarbonate infant feeding bottles - Commission Implementing Regulation(EU) No 321/2011 of 1 April 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 as regards the restriction of use of Bisphenol A in plastic infant feeding bottles; Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 Fresh fruit and vegetables, and bananas - marketing standards - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors; Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products Hops from third countries - Commission Regulation (EC) No 1295/2008 of 18 December 2008 on the importation of hops from third countries; Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products. Documents for imports of wines from third countries and accompanying documents for monitoring and certification of wine products - Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273of 11 December 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the scheme of authorisations for vine plantings, the vineyard register, accompanying documents and certification, the inward and outward register, compulsory declarations, notifications and publication of notified information, and supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the relevant checks and penalties, amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 555/2008, (EC) No 606/2009 and (EC) No 607/2009 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 436/2009 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/560, Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 single CMO Special import conditions due to contamination risk by aflatoxins - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 884/2014 of 13 August 2014 imposing special conditions governing the import of certain feed and food from certain third countries due to contamination risk by aflatoxins and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1152/2009; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53, Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 on official controls Betel leaves from Bangladesh - 2014/88/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 13 February 2014 suspending temporarily imports from Bangladesh of foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper betle’); Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 -Art.53 Sesame seeds and betel leaves from India - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/186 of 2February 2017 laying down specific conditions applicable to the introduction into the Union of consignments from certain third countries due to microbiological contamination and amending Regulation (EC) No 669/2009; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53 Sprouts - Commission Regulation (EU) No 211/2013 of 11 March 2013 on certification requirements for imports into the Union of sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts; Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Art.48 (1) Single CMO regulation - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products Residues from the manufacture of starch from maize from USA - Commission Regulation (EC) No1375/2007 of 23 November 2007 on imports of residues from the manufacture of starch from maize from the United States of America; Regulation (EU) No1308/2013 Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products Organic products - Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91Chernobyl - Council Regulation (EC) No 733/2008 of 15 July 2008 on the conditions governing imports of agricultural products originating in third countries following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station; Regulation 1635/2006 Official controls on compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules -Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules High risk food and feed of non-animal origin - Commission Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 of 24 July 2009implementing Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the increased level of official controls on imports of certain feed and food of non- animal origin and amending Decision 2006/504/EC Okra and curry leaves from India - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 885/2014 of 13 August 2014laying down specific conditions applicable to the import of okra and curry leaves from India and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 91/2013; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53, Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Art. 15(5) Unauthorised GM rice from CN - 2011/884/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 22 December 2011 on emergency measures regarding unauthorised genetically modified rice in rice products originating from China, amended by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/287/EU, Regulation(EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53 Fukushima - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/6 of 5 January 2016 imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 322/2014; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002- Art. 53 Guar gum from India -Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/175 of 5 February 2015 laying down special conditions applicable to the import of guar gum originating in or consigned from India due to contamination risks by pentachlorophenol and dioxins, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53 Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use., Regulation (EС) No 726/2004, Commission Directive (EU) 2017/1572 of15 September 2017 supplementing Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice for medicinal products for human use Investigational medicinal products for human use - Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC Veterinary medicinal products - Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products; Regulation (EС) No 726/2004, Plant Health Directive -Organisms harmful to plants or plant products - Council Directive 2000/29/EC of8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community, Directive 2004/103/EC Plant Health checks of wooden packaging material from CN - 2013/92/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 18 February 2013 on the supervision, plant health checks and measures to be taken on wood packaging material actually in use in the transport of specified commodities originating in China; Plant Health Directive2000/29/EC; Directive 2004/103/EC Marketing requirements for seeds and plant propagating material - http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/ plant_propagation_material/eu_marketin g_requirements/index_ en.htm Dried beans from Nigeria -Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/943 of 18 June 2015 on emergency measures suspending imports of dried beans from Nigeria and amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 669/2009; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 - Art. 53; Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Art. 15 (5) PROTECTION OF CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS Medals and tokens similar to euro coins - Council Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 of 6 December 2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins; Cash control - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community; Directive (EU)2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing Protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) - Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 Drug precursors - Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors; Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors; Tiered priced medicines -Regulation (EU) 2016/793 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 to avoid trade diversion into the European Union of certain key medicines Anti-Torture Regulation -Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 of 27 June 2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Civil Weapons Directive - Council Directive 91/477/EEC of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons as amended by the Directive 51/2008 Export of firearms, their parts and components and ammunition - Regulation (EU) No 258/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 implementing Article 10 of the United Nations’ Protocol against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition Explosive precursors - Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors, Regulation (EC) No1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC Sanctions or restrictive measures - Article 215 of TFEU
2021/06/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the precautionary principle should remain the guiding principle of the EU product safety legislation allowing competent authorities to take appropriate precautionary measures in case of serious doubt;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the General Safety Product directive was adopted back in 2001 and consumers’ purchasing habits changed consequently since according to the growing e-commerce sales rates;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 28 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B c (new)
Bc. whereas according to evidence gathered by consumer organisations further to a mystery -shopping performed in 2019 on online marketplaces, about two-third of the products purchased online were non-compliant or unsafe;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 46 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance but highlights that, with the exception of customs checks, it only applies to products subject to Union harmonisation legislation, while around one third of all products circulating in the EU are non-harmonised products; urges the Commission to update market surveillance rules, including those for and uniformize market surveillance requirements for both harmonised and non-harmonised products, and make them fit for purpose in the digital age;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 49 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out the need to adapt product safety rules to the digital world to tackle emerging risks and threats for the safety to consumers and protect their financial interests, such as privacy and security, including cybersecurity; asks the Commission to address the challenges of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the internet of things (IoT) and, robotics and 3D-printing in its revision of the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD), and to identify and close gaps within existing legislation such as the Machinery Directive and Radio Equipment Directive, while avoiding duplicating legislation and other product- specific legislations such as the Toys Directive, while avoiding duplicating legislation and ensuring a consistent approach towards product safety;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that consumers' health and safety is put at risk through a very high number of dangerous products that freely circulate in the EU as safety rules on chemicals and other toxic substances in products are missing, not properly enforced ,or need to be reviewed for a stricter framework; therefore calls on the Commission to take additional regulatory measures to eliminate toxic chemicals and substances from consumer products which is a pre-condition for a safe circular economy;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is convinced that AI embedded into products can modify the naturpurpose of products throughout its life-cycle, and have an impact on their safety after they have been placed on the market, in particular as a result of updates or in the case of self-learning technology ; urges the Commission to consider whether ‘placing on the market’ as the decisive moment for the economic operator to guarantee the safety of the product is an approach still fit for purpose while continuous compliance along the lifespan of the product should be at the core of safety requirements for digital goods;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Agrees AI systems should be safe in order to be trustworthy, as outlined by the High-Level Expert Group in its Ethics Guidelines for trustworthy AI; is convinced that an EU-wide approach to AI, including a common definition but also quality-, transparency- and debiasing requirements, especially on the data sets used, is needed to avoid fragmentation of the internal market, which would undermine the trust of citizens and businesses, create legal uncertainty and weaken the EU’s economic competitiveness;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. EncouraUrges the Commission to develop measures, such as risk-basedmandatory assessment schemes and conformity assessment mechanisms as well as re-assessment procedures throughout the life-cycle of products, where they do not yet exist, to ensure the safety and security of products with embedded emerging technologies, and to provide support to SMEs to reduce the burden such measures can createensure compliance with safety rules as well as adequate support to market surveillances authorities to perform their duties;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission to evaluate, in case of a necessary reassessment of products, whether more flexibility could be considered for low-risk products for the purposes of conformity assessment in order to reduce the administrative burden and facilitate product refurbishment;deleted
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Asks the Commission and the Member States to take account of the autonomous self-learning behaviour of AI throughout a product’s lifetime and set up mechanisms such as re-evaluation procedures to demonstrate continuous compliance with product safety rules in light of possible emerging risks; calls for human oversight and effective checks on high-risk AI products to ensure product safety;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 108 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that a regulatory framework on AI should follow a risk- based approach designed on clear and transparent criteria and set-up legal obligations according to the categories of products, based on the potential harm for the individual as well as for society at large, with increased obligations for high- risk products such as mandatory third- party conformity assessment schemes; Adds furthermore that human oversight should be the by-default option for such products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages economic operators to integrate safety and security mechanisms in emerging technologies, including self- repair mechanisms, to prevent the upload of unsafe software, raise awareness of safety problems of their products and patching, and ensure safety throughout their lifecycle, including end-of-life;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance connectivity infrastructure, including 5G, in order to improve the safety of connected products;deleted
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that the lack of cybersecurity of connected devices can compromise product safety, and that this needs to be addressed in the revision of the relevant ruleby defining minimum mandatory requirements addressing privacy and security threats, including against cyberattacks, from design stage in the revision of the relevant rules, both at horizontal and sectoral levels;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to speed upHighlights that the EU Cybersecurity Act is one of the main tools to enhance cyber security at EU level but its efforts to develop a European cybersecurity certification schemebased on a voluntary certification scheme only; Calls on the Commission to come-up with a regulatory framework setting mandatory cybersecurity requirements for AI, IoT and robotics products , ands well as to create corresponding mandatory certification schemes for consumer products that can be quickly updated to adapt to current risks without hindering innovation;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that the use of third-party conformity assessment improves the safety and compliance of products with EU standards by providing independent, reliable and impartial procedures that should be reinforced, also through mandatory obligations, when reviewing the product safety legislation;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Stresses that market surveillance activities are central in making sure that only safe products are placed on the market and that discrepancies among Member States in implementing EU market surveillance legislation are disadvantageous for consumers and businesses, resulting in an unequal playing field and different level of product safety across the internal market; Calls therefore for specific measures such as uniform rules on checks and penalties;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 156 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages Member States to increase the resources and expertise of their market surveillance authorities, to enhance cooperation and develop joint actions among them, including at cross- border level, improve the efficiency and effectiveness of checks, and properly staff custom and market surveillance authorities so as to be able to identify unsafe products, in particular from third countries, and prevent their circulation in the internal market;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission and Member States to set minimum sampling rates; and asks market surveillance authorities to carry out sector- specific mystery shopping on a regular basis at leasf products representing significant percentages of each type of products placed on the market once a year, in particular for theregular basis; Adds that particular attention should be given to product categories most notified on the Safety Gate (Rapex) and take appropriate restrictive measures in case of risk;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recalls that environmental and sustainability requirements in product- specific legislation are also part of the EU safety framework in order to avoid that consumers are exposed to harmful and toxic substances; Calls on the Member States to dedicate additional resources to implementation and enforcement of these requirements with the support from the Commission;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 182 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that products directly purchased by consumers from non-EU economic operators must be subject to effective controls; calls on market surveillance and customs authorities to undertake adequate checks on these products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 188 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Asks the Commission to cooperate with the regulatory authorities of third countries, to exchange market surveillance- related information on dangerous products with them, and to include market surveillance-related provisions in all bilateral trade agreements;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Commission to improve, at European and international level, cooperation between consumer protection, market surveillance and, customs authorities so as to enable the swift transfer of information on unsafe products;and other relevant authorities dealing with safety aspects raised by emerging technologies, such as data protection and privacy, cybersecurity so as to enable the swift transfer of information on unsafe products and coordination of enforcement measures, such as checks and penalties; `
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 203 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Underlines that access to the relevant documentation is key for market surveillances activities to perform their activities and assess the compliance of products with relevant safety rules; Stresses that for AI-embedded products and connected devices, it is essential to provide access to market surveillance authorities to software documentation, data sets and algorithmic-decision making;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Reiterates its call for funding under the MFF Single Market Programme of activities to support and strengthen market surveillance authorities in their tasks across the internal market and ensure uniform enforcement of the rules;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 212 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. WelcoStresses that consumers should be offered equally safe products whether buying online or offline and while welcoming the Product Safety Pledge7 for online marketplaces, but highlights its voluntary character that demonstrated to be not sufficient in making sure that only safe products are placed on the market; calls on the Commission to evaluate the role marketplaces could play in limproviting the detecistribution of unsafe products, and to propose mandatory rules on their responsibility, taking into account the special role of SMEsobligations and responsibility as part of the Digital Services Act, the revision of GPSD and any other relevant legislation; __________________ 7Product Safety Pledge is a voluntary commitment made by online marketplaces with respect to the safety of non-food consumer products sold online by third party sellers from June 2018.
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 220 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. EncouragesCalls on online marketplaces to react as quickly as possible to notifications from Rapex, and to cooperate effectively with the Member States’ competent authorities a well as with consumer organisations when contacted by them to alert about a risk posed by a product by immediately withdrawing unsafe products, and taking measures to avoid that they reappear; asks the Commission to create guidelines forestablish obligations requiring online marketplaces on how to react effectively to unsafe products and withdraw them within the 24 hours of a notification;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 227 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Asks online marketplaces tothe Commission and Member States to step up market surveillance for online marketplaces by developing and putting in place appropriate tools to do so, as well as enhance their cooperation via joint activities, consult Rapex before placing products on their websites, exchange information on sellers that break the rules, take effective measures against them and their supply chain, and develop an easily accessible EU-wide tool for consumers to report unsafe products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 232 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Urges the Commission and the Member States to oblige online marketplaces to create an interface with Rapex alerting them that a product has been notified in the system in order to ensure that products offered for sale are safe, and to introduce a link to Rapex on their websites so as to raise awareness about this platform;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 245 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Asks the Commission to evaluate the necessity of requiring online platforms to put in place effective and appropriate safeguards to tackleban the appearance of advertisements for unsafe products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Considers that standardisation work should take into consideration sustainability aspects when developing product standards in order to prevent the use of harmful and toxic substances posing a serious risk from the design stage to maintain a high-level of safety for consumers;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 270 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Asks the Commission to evaluate how distributed ledger technology and blockchain could enhance the safety of products by improving product traceability throughout the supply chain, including through their standardisation;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Highlights that many standards do not address how men and women may be impacted in different ways by standards which might lead for certain categories of products, such as protective equipment, to discrepancies in terms of safety; Welcomes the signature by over 50 standardisation bodies of the Declaration on Gender Responsive Standards and standards development to address this gender gap; and urges the Commission to include gender-mainstreaming aspects in its standardisation work;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 275 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Notes that consumers respond poorly to recalls, and that unsafe products continue to be used even though they have been recalled; asks the Commission to publish guidelines on recall procedures, including a check list with concrete requirements, in order to increase the number of consumers reached, while taking into account that recalls can create considerable challenges for SMEs;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Asks retailers, online marketplaces and consumer associations to play a greater role in recalls of unsafe products purchased online or offline by ensuring adequate information is available to consumersthat products are withdrawn swiftly from the online marketplace, at the latest within 24 hours, and recalled from consumers through legal obligations on adequate information and targeted contacts ;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance cross-border exchange of best practices on recalls, to increase product registration rates so that consumers affected can be more easily identified, even for cross-border purchases, and to enable economic operators to use data - such as loyalty schemes - to reach consumers without infringing GDPR rules;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the progress made through Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs), especially in Indonesia and Ghana, and the increased dialogue between governments, industry and civil society in several countries resulting from the VPA process; is convinced that the EU should continue to engage with VPA countries to ensure it remains an attractive alternative to export markets with less stringent environmental standards; welcomes the Commission’s upcoming fitness check of the FLEGT Regulation and the EU Timber Regulation; Warns against recent development in Indonesia with regards to lifting FLEGT licensing which will seriously undermine the VPA, and calls on the EU to take immediate action, starting with enhanced dialogue with Indonesian authorities, in order to remediate this;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasises the need to further improve implementation and enforcement of the EUTR to best preserve sustainable trade in imported and domestically produced timber and timber products; notes also that imports of timber and timber products should be more thoroughly checked at the EU borders to ensure that the imported products do indeed comply with the criteria necessary to enter the EU; stresses the strengthening of existing policies must go hand in hand with increased policy coherence to ensure EU policies, including trade, do not create negative impacts on environment or people.
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to step up capacity support to VPA countries in order to accelerate the implementation of the commitments made, including combatting corruption and greenwashing, enhancing good governance, and explonsuring the inclusion of more ambitious sustainable forestry provisionsbinding and enforceable sustainable forestry and ecosystem protection provisions, including the protection of indigenous peoples and local communities rights, in trade and sustainable development chapters in its trade agreements;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU to more closely cooperate with trade partners and like- minded importing countries in the fight against deforestation and climate change while safeguarding avenues for legal tradetrade that complies with EU regulatory requirements and TSD provisions in trade agreements;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes with concern that research continues to affirm a worrying link between zoonotic diseases, such as COVID-19, and deforestation, climate change and biodiversity loss; Notes also with concern that commercial export- oriented agriculture remains a major driver of global deforestation, since around 75 per cent of all deforestation now comes from the conversion of natural forests for agriculture, and that around half of all tropical deforestation since 2000 has been due to the illegal conversion of forests for commercial agriculture;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of measures ensuring that demand is in line with the stated goalEuropean Green deal objectives, as the EU is a major importer of commodities associated with deforestation; highlights that commodities like cocoa offer an early chance to make progress on such an approach, learning lessons from the FLEGT-VPA process;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the EU communication on "Stepping up EU action to protect and restore the worlds’s forests"; notes that the EU has regulated the supply chains of timber, fish and conflict minerals, but not yet of forest-risk agricultural commodities; recalls that legislation regulating access to the EU market for forest-risk commodities would be the most effective demand-side measure to combat deforestation; urges the Commission to develop an enforceable framework for due diligence obligations in the entire supply chain of these commodities in order to identify, prevent, and mitigate environmental, social and human rights risks and impacts
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the FLEGT licensing process complements voluntary third-party certificationvoluntary third-party certification complements the FLEGT licensing process, and that it iscan be particularly beneficial for smaller operators that often struggle to obtain certification through private sector schemes.;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2019/2156(INI)

5 a. Recalls that conflict timber is already an action area in the FLEGT Action Plan but that insufficient work has been done to address this issue; calls on the Commission to deliver on its commitment to extend the due diligence obligations provided by the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) so as to cover conflict timber in the framework of the upcoming review;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Stresses that corruption linked to illegal logging should be addressed in the EU trade policy; urges the Commission to include in its FTAs illegal logging related anti-corruption provisions that are enforceable and which must be effectively and fully implemented; such provisions should include underpricing of wood in concessions, harvesting of protected trees by commercial corporations, smuggling of forest products across borders, illegal logging and processing forest raw materials without a licence; further calls on the EU to enhance collaboration with organisations aiming to prevent global forestry crime;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Recalls the importance of adequate access to justice, legal remedies and effective protection for whistleblowers in natural resources exporting countries in order to ensure the efficiency of any legislation or initiative; further calls on the EU to introduce a formal and independent complaints mechanism that would allow citizens, and local stakeholders with effective recourse to remedy, and a tool to address potential negative impacts on human rights, notably through the application of the State to State Dispute settlement to the trade and sustainable development provisions in FTAs;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Recalls that the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights must be respected; supports the ongoing negotiations to create a binding UN instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights and stresses the importance of the EU being proactively involved in this process;
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2019/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Calls for the suspension of the EU-Mercosur Agreement process until binding and legally enforceable provisions to address climate change, deforestation, biodiversity loss and to protect indigenous communities’ rights have been included.
2020/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In accordance with Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, the Union is to define and pursue common policies and actions, and improve cooperation in all fields in international relations in order, inter alia, to encourage the integration of all countries into the world economy, including through the progressive abolition of restrictions on international trade, to ensure sustainable development and to foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 51 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Many third countries are reluctant to open their public procurement and their concessions markets to international competition, or to open those markets further than what they have already done. As a result, Union economic operators face restrictive procurement practices in many of the trading partner of the Union. Those restrictive procurement practices may result in the loss of substantial tradtrading opportunities. Nevertheless, it should be noted that many third countries apply such restrictions ing opportunitierder to pursue legitimate public policy objectives and development goals.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council16 contains only a few provisions concerning the external dimension of the public procurement policy of the Union, in particular Articles 85 and 86 . These provisions have a limited scope and should be replaced. _________________ 16Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The objectives of improvingaddressing serious and recurrent impairment to the access of Union economic operators to the public procurement and concessions markets of certain third countries protected by restrictive and discriminatory procurement measures or practices and of preserving equal conditions of competitionand of preserving equal conditions of competition, also with respect for environmental, social and labour standards, within the internal market require to refer to the non- preferential rules of origin established in the EU customs legislation, so that contracting authorities and contracting entities know whether goods and services are covered by the international commitments of the Union.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In the light of the overall policy objective of the Union to support the economic growth of developing countries and their integration into the global value chain, and in line with the Union’s commitment to policy coherence for development pursuant to Article 208 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, which is the basis for the establishment by the Union of a generalised system of preferences as outlined in Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 8, this Regulation should not apply to tenders where more than 50% of the total value of the tender is made up of goods and services originating, in accordance with the Union’s non- preferential rules of origin, in least- developed countries benefitting from the "Everything But Arms" arrangement or in developing countries considered to be vulnerable due to a lack of diversification and insufficient integration within the international trading system as defined respectively in Annexes IV and VII to Regulation (EU) No 978/2012. _________________ 19Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 (OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p. 1)Generalised System of Preferences.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When assessing whether restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices exist in a third country, the Commission should examine to what degree laws on public procurement and concessions of the country concerned ensure transparency in line with international standards in the field of public procurement and preclude any discrimination against Union goods, services and economic operators. In addition, it should examine to what degree individual contracting authorities or contracting entities maintain or adopt discriminatory practices against Union goods, services and economic operators. In doing so, the Commission should assess and seek information from the country concerned regarding the extent to which such practices may be legitimate in accordance with the country’s public policy objectives and development goals.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In view of the fact that the access of third country goods and services to the public procurement market of the Union falls within the scope of the common commercial policy, Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities should not be able to restrict the access of third country goods or services to their tendering procedures by any other measure than those provided for in this Regulation.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Third country economic operators are not always bound by the equivalent environmental, social or labour standards as those applicable to EU economic operators creating an uneven level- playing field in the Union’s public procurement market. Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU foresee a certain number of provisions for Member States and contracting authorities to ensure compliance with obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law at both national and Union level, as well as with obligations stemming from international conventions that may result in the exclusion of certain bidders. However, the application of those rules might prove insufficient to address possible distortions. The instruments foreseen under this Regulation should therefore aim at fostering the application of EU public procurement rules in this area;.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In the determination of whether the start of an investigation and/or the adoption of a measure under the International Procurement Instrument ('IPI') is in the interest of the Union, the general objective of addressing serious and recurrent impairment to market access opportunities for Union economic operators should be given special consideration. The Commission should also take into account the presence of third country bidders on the EU procurement market at a given moment. IPI measures may not be applied where the Commission, on the basis of all information submitted, can clearly conclude that it is not in the Union interest to apply such measures; the Commission should pay particular attention to sectors that are considered strategic in respect of EU public procurement;
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 b (new)
(19b) When conducting its investigation, the Commission should also take into consideration the application or non- application by a third country of environmental, social and labour standards stemming from international conventions in those fields which the country has ratified and that are listed in Annex X of Directive 2014/23/EU, Annex X of Directive 2014/24/EU and Annex XIV of Directive 2014/25/EU. The Commission should equally include findings on the implementation of the Paris Agreement by the third country in question. If the investigation confirms the non-conformity with applicable rules, the results of the investigation should be used by contracting authorities to apply provisions foreseen under Directives 2014/24/EU, 2014/23/EU, 2014/25/EU with respect to the performance of contracts or in cases of abnormally low tenders.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) If the consultations with the country concerned do not lead to sufficient improvements to the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services within a reasonable timeframe, the Commission should be able to adopt, where appropriate, price adjustment measure applying to tenders submitted by International Procurement Instrument (IPI) measures under the form of a score adjustment measure applying to tenders or by providing for the exclusion from the tender procedure of economic operators originating in that country and/or including goods and services originating in that country.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Such measures should be applied only for the purpose of the evaluation of tenders comprising goods or services originating in the country concerned. To avoid circumvention of those measures, it may also be necessary to target certain foreign-controlled or owned legal persons that, although established in the European Union, are not engaged in substantive business operations that have a direct and effective link with the economy of at least one Member State . Appropriate measures should not be disproportionate to the restrictive procurement practices to which they respond.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to simplify the application of a price adjustmentn IPI measure by contracting authorities or contracting entities, there should be a presumption that all economic operators originating in a targeted third country with which there is no agreement on procurement will be subject to the measure, unless they can demonstrate that less than 50% of the total value of their tender is made up of goods or services originating in the third country concerned.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Member States are best placed to identify the contracting authorities or contracting entities, or categories of contracting authorities or contracting entities, which should apply the price adjustment measure. To ensure that an appropriate level of action is taken and that a fair distribution of the burden among Member States is achieved, the Commission should take the final decision, based on a list submitted by each Member State. Where necessary, the Commission may establish a list on its own initiative.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) It is imperative that contracting authorities and contracting entities have access to a range of high-quality and sustainable products meeting their purchasing requirements at a competitive price. Therefore contracting authorities and contracting entities should be able not to apply price adjustment, in exceptional circumstances, not to apply IPI measures limiting access of non- covered goods and services in case there are no Union and/or covered goods or services available which meet the requirements of the contracting authority or contracting entity to safeguard essential public needs, for example in the fields of health and public safety, or where the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In case of misapplication by contracting authorities or contracting entities of exceptions to price adjustmentIPI measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services, the Commission should be able to apply the corrective mechanism of Article 3 of Council Directive 89/665/EEC20 or Article 8 of Council Directive 92/13/EEC21 . In addition, contracts concluded with an economic operator by contracting authorities or contracting entities in violation of price adjustmentIPI measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services should be ineffective. _________________ 20Council Directive 89/665/EEC on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 33). 21Council Directive 92/13/EEC coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ L 76, 23.3.1992, p. 14).
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation establishes measures intended to improveensure a fair level-playing field in the international procurement market and address practices that result in serious and recurrent impairment to the access of Union economic operators, goods and services to the public procurement and concessions markets of third countries. It lays down procedures for the Commission to undertake investigations into alleged restrictive and discriminatory procurement measures or practices adopted or maintained by third countries against Union economic operators, goods and services, and to enter into consultations with the third countries concerned.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It provides for the possibility of applying price adjustmentIPI measures to certain tenders for contracts for the execution of works or a work, for the supply of goods and/or the provision of services and for concessions, on the basis of the origin of the economic operators, goods or services concerned. .
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. This Regulation shall apply only with regard to restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices implemented by a third country in respect of purchases of non-covered goods and services. The application of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to any international obligations of the Union.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities shall not apply restrictive measures in respect of third country economic operators, goods and services beyond those provided for in this Regulation.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. This Regulation shall also provide tools for the effective enforcement of the provisions foreseen in Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU and Directive 2014/25/EU in respect of covered and non-covered goods and services where investigations by the Commission demonstrate breaches with relevant international standards in the field of environmental, social and labour law as listed in Annexes X of Directives 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU and in Annex XIV of Directive 2014/25/EU, as well as with commitments undertaken under the Climate Paris Agreement.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) 'IPI measure' means a measure adopted by the Commission in accordance with this Regulation under the form of a Score Adjustment Measure applying to a tender or exclusion of a tender from the Union's procurement or concessions market;
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
(fb) ‘score adjustment measure’ means the relative diminution by a given percentage of the score of a tender resulting from its evaluation by a contracting authority or a contracting entity on the basis of the specified award criteria in the procurement notice; for cases where contracting authorities base the award of public contracts on the “most economically advantageous tender” approach, the score adjustment means applying a price penalty taking into consideration quality criteria, including environmental and/or social aspects, based on their relative weighting;
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Tenders shall be exempted from this Regulation where more than 50% of the total value of the tender is made up of goods and/or services originating in least- developed countries listed in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 978/201227 , and in developing countries considered to be vulnerable due to a lack of diversification and insufficient integration within the international trading system as defined in Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 978/2012. _________________ 27Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Councilcountries benefitting from the Generalised Scheme of Preferences in accordance with Regulation (ECU) No 732/2008 (OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p. 1)978/2012.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In its investigation into alleged restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices, the Commission shall also determine whether the third country concerned has major shortcomings in implementing obligations stemming from international conventions in the field of environmental, social and labour law and listed in Annex X of Directive 2014/23/EU, Annex X of Directive 2014/24/EU and Annex XIV of Directive 2014/25/EU with the view of enforcing the application of those Directives, as well as with commitments undertaken under the Paris Climate Agreement.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 143 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Authorities or entities concerned The Commission shall determine the contracting authorities or entities or categories of contracting authorities or entities, listed by Member State, whose procurement is concerned by the measure. To provide the basis for this determination, each Member State shall submit a list of appropriate contracting authorities or entities or categories of contracting authorities or entities. The Commission shall ensure that an appropriate level of action is taken and that a fair distribution of the burden among Member States is achieved.rticle 9 deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
[...]deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities may decide not to apply the price adjustmentIPI measure with respect to a procurement or a concession procedure if:
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 166 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the economic operator offers goods or services which are aligned with the criteria set out in Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17
Amendment of Directive 2014/25/EU Articles 85 and 86 of Directive 2014/25/EU shall be deleted with effect from the entry into force of this Regulation.rticle 17 deleted
2021/09/10
Committee: IMCO