Activities of Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Plenary speeches (51)
State of implementation of anti-money laundering legislation (debate)
State of play of the disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches - public country-by-country reporting
Interference from other countries in our democracies and elections (topical debate)
Requirements for payment service providers - Measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud (debate)
Withdrawal Agreement of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (debate)
False and Authentic Documents Online (FADO) system (debate)
European coordinated response to the COVID-19 outbreak (debate)
Conclusions of the extraordinary European Council meeting of 23 April 2020 - New MFF, own resources and Recovery plan (debate)
EU Recovery package (debate)
Tourism and transport in 2020 and beyond (debate)
The 2019 Human Rights Annual report - Stability and Security in the Mediterranean and the negative role of Turkey - Situation in Belarus (debate)
Digital Finance: emerging risks in crypto-assets - regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets - Further development of the Capital Markets Union (CMU): improving access to capital market finance, in particular by SMEs, and further enabling retail investor participation (debate)
Digital Finance: emerging risks in crypto-assets - regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets - Further development of the Capital Markets Union (CMU): improving access to capital market finance, in particular by SMEs, and further enabling retail investor participation (debate)
Fight against money laundering, following the FinCEN files (debate)
Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market - Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online - Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed - Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies - Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence - Intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (continuation of debate)
Sustainable Europe Investment Plan - How to finance the Green Deal (debate)
A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (short presentation)
A new strategy for European SMEs (debate)
Revision of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) guidelines (debate)
Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (debate)
Markets in financial instruments – EU Recovery prospectus and targeted adjustments for financial intermediaries to help the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic (debate)
InvestEU programme (debate)
Tackling the economic impact of the COVID pandemic by focusing on investment, competitiveness and skills (debate)
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The outcome of EU-UK negotiations (continuation of debate)
Saving the summer tourism season - EU support to the hospitality sector (debate)
Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (debate)
State of the SMEs Union – Implementation of better regulation agenda / Reduction target for administrative burden (continuation of debate)
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (debate)
Assessing the Union’s measures for the EU tourism sector as the end of the Summer season nears (debate)
European solutions to the rise of energy prices for businesses and consumers: the role of energy efficiency and renewable energy and the need to tackle energy poverty (debate)
Digital Markets Act (debate)
Rising energy prices and market manipulation on the gas market (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 23-24 June 2022, including the meeting with Western Balkan leaders on 23 June - Candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia (debate)
Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
Impact of new technologies on taxation: crypto and blockchain (debate)
Resilience of critical entities (debate)
Amendments to the European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) Regulation (debate)
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (debate)
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) - Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (debate)
Digital euro (debate)
Make Europe the place to invest (debate)
State of the SME Union (debate)
SME Relief Package (debate)
Intelligent Road Transport Systems (debate)
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (debate)
Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehicles (debate)
Unitary supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products - Unitary supplementary certificate for medicinal products - Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products (recast) - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (recast) - Standard essential patents (joint debate - Patents)
Data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services (debate)
Improving the Union’s protection against market manipulation on the wholesale energy market (debate)
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (debate)
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (debate)
Reports (6)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 as regards provisions relating to distance sales of goods and certain domestic supplies of goods
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of the issuance of visas
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision amending Directives (EU) 2017/2455 and (EU) 2019/1995 as regards the dates of transposition and application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis
REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on Digital Finance: emerging risks in crypto-assets - regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 as regards the EU Recovery prospectus and targeted adjustments for financial intermediaries to help the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market amending Directive 98/26/EC and repealing Directives 2015/2366/EU and 2009/110/EC
Shadow reports (19)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax and Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty as regards defence effort within the Union framework
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards introducing certain requirements for payment service providers
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2454 as regards the dates of application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis
REPORT on the European Parliament recommendation to the Council and the Commission concerning the conclusion of an agreement, under negotiation, between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the InvestEU Programme
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (the ‘Pericles IV’ programme), and repealing Regulation (EU) No 331/2014
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of ordinary passports
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on markets in crypto-assets and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/760 as regards the scope of eligible assets and investments, the portfolio composition and diversification requirements, the borrowing of cash and other fund rules and as regards requirements pertaining to the authorisation, investment policies and operating conditions of European long-term investment funds
REPORT on the action plan to boost long-distance and cross-border passenger rail
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part, on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the authorities of New Zealand competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Opinions (4)
OPINION on Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
OPINION on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1227/2011 and (EU) 2019/942 to improve the Union’s protection against market manipulation in the wholesale energy market
Shadow opinions (14)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)
OPINION on the implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Social Climate Fund
OPINION on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing a Social Climate Fund
OPINION on the implementation of the Updated New Industrial Strategy for Europe: aligning spending to policy
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European single access point providing centralised access to publicly available information of relevance to financial services, capital markets and sustainability
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2019/942 as well as Directives (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 to improve the Union’s electricity market design
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) and repealing Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the digital euro
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes, as well as Directives (EU) 2015/2302, (EU) 2019/2161 and (EU) 2020/1828
Institutional motions (47)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the situation of environmental activists and Ukrainian political prisoners
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Hong Kong
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the situation of environmental activists and Ukrainian political prisoners
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women's rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, notably the situation of women’s rights defenders and imprisoned EU dual nationals
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Turkish military operation in northeast Syria and its consequences
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the proposed criminal code of Indonesia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of LGBTI people in Uganda
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Haiti
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cuba, the case of José Daniel Ferrer
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of freedoms in Algeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Bolivia
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent actions by the Russian Federation against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the tragic events of 13 January 1991 in Vilnius
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Bolivia
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent actions by the Russian Federation against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the tragic events of 13 January 1991 in Vilnius
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Haiti
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cuba, the case of José Daniel Ferrer
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of freedoms in Algeria
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights including religious freedoms in Burkina Faso
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Russian "Foreign Agents" Law
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, notably the allegations of sexual abuse of boys in the Logar Province
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights and democracy in Nicaragua
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Uyghurs in China (China Cables)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights and democracy in Nicaragua
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the Uyghurs in China (China Cables)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights including religious freedoms in Burkina Faso
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Russian ‘foreign agents’ law
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, notably the allegations of sexual abuse of boys in the Logar Province
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi, notably freedom of expression
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela after the illegal election of the new National Assembly Presidency and Bureau (parliamentary coup)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela after the illegal election of the new National Assembly Presidency and Bureau (parliamentary coup)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi, notably freedom of expression
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Guinea-Conakry, notably violence towards protesters
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Child labour in mines in Madagascar
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Republic of Guinea, notably violence towards protestors
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on child labour in mines in Madagascar
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the accessibility and affordability of COVID testing
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
Oral questions (1)
Dual quality of products in the single market
Written explanations (322)
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B9-0006/2019, B9-0006/2019, B9-0007/2019, B9-0008/2019, B9-0009/2019, B9-0010/2019, B9-0011/2019)
. – Usnesení o situaci ve Venezuele jsem podpořil, protože eskalace politické, hospodářské, institucionální, sociální a humanitární krize nesmí pokračovat. Situaci ve Venezuele dlouhodobě sleduji a jsem hluboce znepokojen naprosto kritickým stavem, ve kterém je represe, násilí, nedostatek léků a potravin, porušování lidských práv, inflace, politický útlak nebo korupce na denním pořádku. V důsledku toho opustí Venezuelu do konce roku 5 milionů lidí. Máme tu druhou největší migrační krizi na světě a tu je potřeba řešit ihned a přímo na místě. Navrhované postupy uvedené v této rezoluci plně podporuji a osobně stále věřím, že jediným východiskem z tohoto kritického stavu je mírové a demokratické řešení, tedy takové, které povede ke svobodným a věrohodným volbám.
Draft amending budget No 2/2019: reinforcement of key programmes for EU competitiveness: Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ (A9-0004/2019 - John Howarth)
. – Podpořil jsem návrh opraveného rozpočtu č. 2/2019, protože vnímám oba dotčené programy, tedy Horizont 2020 i Erasmus+, za velice důležité a prospěšné pro občany EU a České republiky. Horizont 2020 je zásadním evropským programem podporujícím vědu, výzkum a inovace. Česká republika má v této oblasti obrovský potenciál a i s ohledem na současné strategie naší vlády jsem hlasoval pro tento návrh. Nejinak tomu bylo u programu Erasmus+, který podporuje spolupráci a mobilitu v oblastech vzdělávání. Program poskytuje studentům unikátní možnost poznat a fungovat v mezinárodním prostředí, což v současném světě vnímám téměř coby podmínku kvalitního vzdělávání.
The UK’s withdrawal from the EU (B9-0038/2019, B9-0039/2019)
I supported Parliament’s resolution on the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. This resolution recalls Parliament’s position as adopted in the wake of the UK’s decision to trigger Article 50. As the resolution outlines, it is in the overwhelming interests of both the UK and the EU that the UK leaves the Union in an orderly manner. The Withdrawal Agreement as agreed between the two sides is the best and indeed only means of achieving this. I also agree that it is imperative that the rights of EU citizens living in the UK, and vice-versa, are not affected by the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.
Patentability of plants and essential biological processes (B9-0040/2019, B9-0040/2019, B9-0041/2019, B9-0042/2019, B9-0043/2019, B9-0044/2019, B9-0047/2019)
. – Podpořil jsem usnesení Evropského parlamentu o patentovatelnosti rostlin a v podstatě biologických procesů, protože se ztotožňuji s názorem, že by rostliny nebo jejich části získané v zásadě biologickými způsoby měly být vyloučeny z patentovatelnosti. Usnesení vnímám coby razantní reakci na nedávné rozhodnutí technického stížnostního senátu Evropského patentového úřadu, které je v rozporu s Mezinárodní úmluvou UPOV na ochranu nových odrůd a evropskou legislativou (nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2100/94). Přístup k rostlinnému materiálu je absolutně nezbytnou podmínkou pro evropské zemědělství ve smyslu bezpečnosti, konkurenceschopnosti, prevence monopolů v oblasti šlechtitelství a konečně i větších příležitostí pro zemědělce.
State of implementation of anti-money laundering legislation (B9-0045/2019, B9-0046/2019)
The updated Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive will contribute to filling the gaps in the EU’s anti-money laundering legal framework, and it is important that this Directive is transposed by all Member States by next year’s deadline. It only takes one weak link within the EU’s financial system for exploitation by criminals, and due to the cross-border nature of the system, we must do all we can – not only on European and national level, but also at the international level – to fight money laundering and terrorist financing. I therefore supported this resolution, which outlines a number of ways in which we can continue to ensure that our financial system is equipped to tackle financial crime.
Eurojust and Serbia Cooperation Agreement (A9-0009/2019 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
. – Eurojust and Serbia Cooperation Agreement is one of several agreements concluded in the past with other non-EU countries to reinforce the fight against organised crime. Enhanced judicial cooperation with Serbia is highly welcomed, mainly in view of the latest Second Visa Suspension Mechanism Report, where, among other issues, Serbian nationals have been mentioned as one of the most frequently reported nationalities for organised property crimes in the EU. I strongly believe that the concluded agreement will help to address the shortfalls identified in the report and therefore I voted in favour of this resolution.
Foreign electoral interference and disinformation in national and European democratic processes (B9-0108/2019, B9-0111/2019)
. – I voted in favour of the Parliament’s resolution on foreign electoral interference and disinformation in national and European democratic processes. Free and fair elections are a backbone of every democracy and the protection of these processes against foreign state and non-state electoral interference and disinformation is of the utmost importance. We need to safeguard basic principles of European democracies. It is further signalled that additional support to relevant public institutions and NGOs, as well as stepping up financing to EU East StratCom Task Force, is needed to achieve a better management of risks outlined in the text. I am confident that this resolution will stir up the discussions on the creation of additional mechanisms that will enhance our resilience against any type of hostile foreign electoral meddling in the future.
Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 and own resources: time to meet citizens' expectations (B9-0110/2019, B9-0112/2019, B9-0113/2019)
It is important that the upcoming Multi-annual Financial Framework is realistic, results-focused, and future oriented. I support Parliament’s call to boost funding for areas such as research, innovation and digitalisation as well as funding to help SMEs grow in Europe.However, I believe the ceiling for the budget should be more realistic and represent value for money for taxpayers. Finally, I have concerns with regards to new own resources. For these reasons I did not support the final resolution.
Employment and social policies of the euro area (A9-0016/2019 - Yana Toom)
. – Nezaměstnanost a vzdělávání mladých lidí, problematika dlouhodobé nezaměstnanosti nebo chudoba pracujících jsou velmi důležitá společenská témata, kterým se musíme věnovat. V rámci EU však v souladu s principem subsidiarity odpovědnost za politiku zaměstnanosti a jiné sociální politiky náleží především členským státům. Koordinaci a monitorování národních politik nebo sdílení osvědčených postupů na unijní úrovni tak vnímám jako přiměřenou formu spolupráce v této oblasti. Naopak nesouhlasím s tím, aby se Evropská unie zabývala návrhy, jako například vytvoření evropského systému zajištění podpory nezaměstnanosti, a i proto jsem hlasoval proti tomuto usnesení.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Assessment of the impact of plant protection products on honeybees (B9-0149/2019)
. – Návrh Komise na prováděcí akt týkající se kritérií pro posuzování dopadů přípravků na ochranu rostlin na včely zjevně nevycházel z nejnovějších vědeckých a technických poznatků. Komise nerespektovala stanovisko agentury EFSA, která nám, politikům, má v těchto záležitostech poskytnout odborné vodítko a která uvedla, že pro řádné posouzení rizik aktivních látek je důležité zvážit nejen akutní toxicitu, ale i toxicitu chronickou a toxicitu pro larvy. Proto jsem podpořil společně s naší politickou frakcí Renew Europe námitku Evropského parlamentu, který vyzval Komisi, aby zahrnula do navrženého textu chybějící výše uvedené aspekty, a to i vzhledem k tomu, že pro všechny tyto parametry jsou k dispozici pokyny OECD.
Effects of the bankruptcy of Thomas Cook Group (RC-B9-0118/2019, B9-0118/2019, B9-0119/2019, B9-0120/2019, B9-0121/2019, B9-0122/2019, B9-0124/2019)
I supported the resolution, which addresses the issue of the Thomas Cook bankruptcy and its effects on businesses and consumers. The failure of the company led to passengers either being unable to travel or being stranded at their destination. It has also negatively affected many hoteliers and other businesses which rely on the tourism sector. There were also a large number of direct job losses across the EU. This resolution is an important signal from the European Parliament that we are attentive to the distress and inconvenience caused to all of those affected.
State of play of the disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches - public country-by-country reporting (B9-0117/2019)
It is in the interest of the EU to rapidly come to an agreement on public country-by-country reporting. This will help our SMEs to compete against multinationals on a more equal level and will ensure more transparency on where the largest companies pay the largest proportion of their taxes. Taxes should be paid where profits are earned. For all of these reasons I supported the Parliament’s resolution.
Search and rescue in the Mediterranean (B9-0130/2019, B9-0131/2019, B9-0132/2019, B9-0154/2019)
. – Dle mého názoru text usnesení předložený plénu EP obsahoval mnoho ustanovení, která šla výrazně mimo rámec problematiky pátracích a záchranných akcí. Jsem toho názoru, že hlavní odpovědnost za záchranu životů nesou jednotlivé státy a není správné, abychom odpovědnost nebo hlavní těžiště zátěže za záchranu životů dávali neziskovým organizacím. V první radě je totiž nutné zajistit, aby tyto aktivity nebyly zneužívány ze strany sítí pašeráků, kteří se na nelegálním převádění podílejí velkou měrou. Některá ustanovení textu se vracela k povinným relokačním mechanismům jako nástrojům řešení problému, s čím zásadně nesouhlasím, jelikož povinné relokace jsou nefunkční. Proto jsem hlasoval proti tomuto textu.
Opening accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania (B9-0155/2019, RC-B9-0156/2019, B9-0156/2019, B9-0157/2019, B9-0158/2019, B9-0159/2019, B9-0160/2019, B9-0161/2019)
. – Rozhodnutí Evropské rady odložit zahájení přístupových jednání se Severní Makedonií a Albánií vnímám jako strategickou chybu s velice negativní dopadem na mezinárodní kredibilitu Evropské unie. Za prvé, tato nečinnost poškozuje obě země, které s vizí přiblížit se Evropské unii odvedly obrovský kus práce a stanovené podmínky splnily. Stejně tak toto rozhodnutí ale poškozuje i samotnou Unii, pro kterou je institut rozšíření důležitým nástrojem zahraniční politiky, který mj. pomáhá upevňovat její pozici na mezinárodním poli a značnou měrou přispívá ke stabilizaci regionů v bezprostředním sousedství. Netřeba příliš přemýšlet, jaký signál toto vysílá ostatním zemím v regionu nebo co bude náplní volebních kampaní v předčasných volbách v Severní Makedonii, ke kterým rozhodnutí Evropské rady vedlo. Nemůžeme samozřejmě ani zapomenout na další globální aktéry, jejichž vliv může nyní v daném regionu posílit. Usnesení Evropského parlamentu týkající se problematiky přístupových jednání se Severní Makedonií a Albánií jsem tudíž z výše uvedených důvodů podpořil.
Distance sales of goods and certain domestic supplies of goods (A9-0019/2019 - Ondřej Kovařík)
. – As rapporteur for the Parliament’s opinion, I fully support the adopted position. We need a VAT regime which is fit for the digital age. The modernisation of the rules for e-commerce will simplify VAT procedures across the single market and will make it easier to buy and sell goods on a cross-border basis. This directive will also help to close existing loopholes which hinder VAT collection. These new measures are a good example of rules which are fit for the digital age and which will particularly benefit smaller enterprises which aim to do business across the EU.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified cotton LLCotton25 (ACS-GHØØ1-3) (B9-0170/2019)
. – Hlasoval jsem proti předloženému textu námitky ve věci geneticky modifikované bavlny LLCotton25, a to především na základě vědeckého stanoviska Evropského úřadu pro bezpečnost potravin (EFSA), který uvádí, že žádost o obnovení povolení pro výše uvedený produkt neobsahovala důkazy o nových rizicích, změně expozice nebo nové vědecké nejistotě, které by změnily závěry původního hodnocení rizik přijatého v roce 2006.
Criminalisation of sexual education in Poland (B9-0166/2019, B9-0167/2019, B9-0168/2019)
. – I believe that sexual education in schools is important at providing objective information to young people. Such education helps them to approach critically to often conflicting information found on the internet. It equally has positive effects on forming children’s worldview in building a respectful attitude towards sexual relationships and in deconstructing gender stereotypes, which may help in decreasing gender-based violence. With this in mind, I voted in favour of the resolution, which condemns the criminalisation of sexual education in Poland.
Amending VAT and excise duty rules as regards defence effort within the Union framework (A9-0034/2019 - Paul Tang)
. – I supported this Directive, which aims to align VAT treatment of defence efforts in both the EU and NATO frameworks as far as feasible. The proposal is part of the package of measures to modernise the EU’s VAT framework and make the system simpler and more resistant to fraud. It will furthermore align the EU’s treatment of VAT to that of NATO as an international body. It is important that any exemptions within the scope of this Directive apply only when forces take part in a defence effort carried out under the Common Security and Defence Policy.
Election of the Commission
. – Nová Komise se sice kvůli zamítnutí některých navržených kandidátů o měsíc opozdila, na druhou stranu byla nakonec schopna obdržet od Evropského parlamentu vcelku silný mandát. Ursula von der Leyenová představila ambiciózní program. S prioritami, jako je oblast digitalizace nebo silnější EU ve světě, lze souhlasit. Některé jsou naopak poněkud sporné, ať v oblasti tzv. sociální Evropy či klimatických změn. Z globálního pohledu si EU jako světová obchodní velmoc může dovolit klást v boji proti klimatické změně odvážné cíle, nesmí ale spouštět ze zřetele specifickou situaci některých zvláště zranitelných regionů. S novou Komisí přichází také pozitivní návrhy. Zřízení samostatného portfolia zahrnujícího obranu, průmysl a vesmír je signálem, jak velkou váhu přikládá obranné spolupráci a bezpečnosti Unie a jejích hranic, která je dnes stále více potřeba. Toto nemusí hned nutně znamenat evropskou armádu, pro kterou by se v tuto chvíli v rámci unijní sedmadvacítky jen těžko hledala shoda, ale v cílené podpoře obranné a obranně-průmyslové spolupráce, která má vedle čistě strategického rozměru i nezanedbatelný ekonomický přínos. Z pohledu České republiky je to jasná priorita. Důležité bude, zda vsadí nová Komise na kvalitu nebo kvantitu. Slib von der Leyenové, že za každý nový návrh škrtne jednu starou legislativu, je dobrou zprávou.
2020 budgetary procedure: joint text (A9-0035/2019 - Monika Hohlmeier, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
. – I voted in favour of the final agreement on the EU’s budget for 2020. I welcome the extra financing agreed for the instrument for small and medium-sized businesses as well as transition funds for competitive energy. I also welcome the commitment to a budget which is frugal and results-oriented. It is important that Union financing focuses on areas where there can be real added value to citizens.
Climate and environmental emergency (RC-B9-0209/2019, B9-0209/2019, B9-0211/2019, B9-0212/2019, B9-0215/2019, B9-0216/2019, B9-0218/2019, B9-0220/2019)
. – Hlasoval jsem proti usnesení Evropského parlamentu o vyhlášení stavu klimatické a environmentální nouze, protože to nepovažuji za projev konstruktivního a zodpovědného přístupu k dané problematice. Toto gesto mi přijde zbytečné, byť chápu, že pro něj byla určitá politická poptávka některých kolegů před prosincovou klimatickou konferencí OSN v Madridu. Jako Evropský parlament se klimatickou politikou budeme zabývat při projednávání jednotlivých návrhů, podobná prohlášení jsou tak z mého pohledu naprosto kontraproduktivní. Jako pozitivní na tomto usnesení vidím alespoň to, že se mi s kolegy podařilo prosadit pozměňovací návrh, který navrhuje přijmout vlastní opatření ke snížení emisí Evropského parlamentu a který vyzývá členské státy, aby se dohodly na jediném sídle tohoto orgánu. Pravidelné přesuny tisíců lidí a dokumentů mezi Bruselem a Štrasburkem jsou zcela proti duchu tohoto usnesení, proto bychom si měli nejprve zamést před vlastním prahem a jít příkladem.
Requirements for payment service providers (A9-0048/2019 - Lídia Pereira)
This Directive aims to clarify the obligations for payment service providers (PSPs) as regards the information that must be retained and reported for VAT purposes. It is part of a number of measures which aim to reduce VAT fraud and revenue losses in the e-commerce sector. I supported the Parliament’s position on the directive, which emphasises the importance of legislation fit for the digital age, as well as clarifying who is responsible for reporting particular information to the tax authorities.
Measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in order to combat VAT fraud (A9-0047/2019 - Lídia Pereira)
The VAT gap in the EU, although decreasing, is still standing at around EUR 130 billion per year. As part of the EU’s efforts to reduce the shortfall in VAT revenues, Member States have agreed to strengthen administrative cooperation between VAT authorities in Europe. This report forms part of the consultation of the European Parliament on these measures. I support Parliament’s report, particularly the emphasis on ensuring that the regulation is fit for the digital age.
Fair taxation in a digitalised and globalised economy - BEPS 2.0 (B9-0238/2019)
This resolution aims to agree a common Parliament position on the issue of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in the context of OECD—level discussions on improving the international tax landscape, particularly as regards multinational companies. While I support the work ongoing at OECD level, and the aim to reduce profit shifting globally, I could not fully support this resolution for a number of reasons. Firstly, I do not support the calls for a move away from tax decisions being taken within the EU on a qualified majority basis. Tax policy is a Member State competence, and I believe that it is not the right time to move fiscal powers to the EU level. Secondly, I have some reservations about having a specific minimum tax rate in the EU for corporate taxation. Again, I believe that this is for Member States to decide individually. The EU and Member States should focus on working together at the OECD level to come to a common agreement on fairer taxation across the globe.
EU Pollinators Initiative (B9-0233/2019)
Souhlasím s názorem, že opylovači představují základní složku biologické rozmanitosti a jsou nezbytným faktorem v sektoru zemědělství. Úbytek jejich populace má vliv na kvalitu a kvantitu zemědělských výnosů a představuje hrozbu pro produkci potravin. Zajišťují v rámci ekosystému i další důležité přímé a nepřímé funkce, jako je ochrana proti škůdcům, udržování kvality půdy a vody a udržování krajinného rázu. Je třeba přijmout kroky na ochranu a obnovu opylovačů. Usnesení Evropského parlamentu o iniciativě EU týkající se opylovačů jsem tudíž podpořil.
Situation of the Uyghur in China (China-cables) (RC-B9-0246/2019, B9-0246/2019, B9-0247/2019, B9-0248/2019, B9-0249/2019, B9-0250/2019)
EU se zavázala hájit prosazování a dodržování lidských práv, demokracie a právního státu v rámci své vnější činnosti a mělo by tomu tak být i u politiky EU vůči Číně. Jsem znepokojen nad stále represivnějším systémem, jemuž čelí Ujguři a ostatní etnické menšiny. Statisíce Ujgurů a etnických Kazachů jsou posílány na „převýchovu“ na základě systému prediktivního zajišťování bezpečnosti, lidé jsou zatýkáni i za cestu do zahraničí či za své náboženské založení. Tento stav je nepřípustný, a proto jsem podpořil usnesení Evropského parlamentu o situaci Ujgurů v Číně.
Common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises (A9-0055/2019 - Inese Vaidere)
. ‒ This directive simplifies the rules for small and medium-size businesses as regards the VAT rules which will apply to them in the case of cross-border transactions. I supported Parliament’s approval of the directive as it is important to ensure that SMEs are able to grow both locally, as well as nationally and across the single market. I particularly appreciate the One Stop Shop for SMEs, which will help them to have a single point of contact in order to understand and apply the new VAT rules.
Implementing and monitoring the provisions on citizens’ rights in the Withdrawal Agreement (B9-0031/2020)
There are currently over three million EU non-UK citizens residing in the UK while over a million UK citizens reside in the remaining EU Member States. They all currently enjoy rights under the EU law and should be granted the full set of rights as agreed in the Withdrawal Agreement. On top of that, we should also bear in mind that there are nearly two million Northern Ireland citizens, who by right of birth are entitled to Irish citizenship and by extension EU citizenship and related rights. While not all Northern Ireland citizens may choose to identify as Irish, the right to do so will remain. I supported this resolution and I hope that in the future both the EU and the UK will work in the interests of their citizens in order to provide them with certainty regarding their rights and obligations.
Institutions and bodies in the Economic and Monetary Union: Preventing post-public employment conflicts of interest (B9-0047/2020)
The integrity of public institutions is of key importance for the trust of citizens. Therefore, it is important that there is no immediate undue influence of private-sector representatives formerly active within a public institution without any cooling-off period. It is important that the Parliament resolution made this point clear and questioned the situation regarding the new assignment of the EBA Executive Director. I therefore supported the resolution.
Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (A9-0004/2020 - Guy Verhofstadt)
I supported the legislative resolution on the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, which is giving consent to the conclusion of the draft withdrawal agreement. I would like to emphasise that this was not a vote for or against Brexit. This vote was about choosing between an orderly or disorderly Brexit. In the interests of our citizens living in the UK, it was important that we agree to an orderly exit of the UK, which will mean that for the next 11 months we have a large degree of continuity. Finally, let me emphasise the importance of putting all of our efforts into achieving a satisfactory framework for our future relationship with the UK as soon as possible.
Gender pay gap (B9-0069/2020, B9-0073/2020, B9-0083/2020, B9-0084/2020)
. ‒ I support the efforts for reducing the gender pay gap and the gender pension gap consequently. However, I disagree with parts of this resolution on binding measures and strong enforcement policies for companies, especially within the private sector, as I believe these are not the most effective or appropriate ways to deal with this problem. Therefore, I could not vote for this text but as the principle of equal pay for men and women should be generally upheld I abstained in order not to vote against the resolution.
Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement (A9-0003/2020 - Geert Bourgeois)
I supported the EU-Vietnam free trade and investment protection agreements. I am glad that the EU continues to champion free trade at a time when it is particularly necessary. These agreements will gradually eliminate the vast majority of customs duties and include binding rules on other areas which are particular important to the EU such as human rights and the abolition of forced labour. The agreement will also commit Vietnam to applying the Paris Agreement. The Czech Republic and Vietnam have long held a close relationship, and I look forward to that further deepening of ties going forward.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Lead and its compounds (B9-0089/2020)
I voted against the European Parliament’s resolution, that is in favour of the draft Commission regulation, based on the European Chemicals Agency’s conclusion that the recycling of PVC containing lead is the best option with respect to other possibilities such as landfill or incineration.Also, there is a lead removal technology project currently financed by Horizon 2020, which will make it possible to recycle PVC into REACH-compliant material. I believe the Commission proceeded systematically and in line with the conclusions of the competent authority, and I therefore voted as stated above.
Automated decision-making processes: Ensuring consumer protection, and free movement of goods and services (B9-0094/2020)
. ‒ I supported Parliament’s resolution on automated decision-making processes: ensuring consumer protection, and free movement of goods and services. I believe there is great potential in the development of automated decision-making processes and artificial intelligence in general to provide better services to consumers. At the same time, rapid technological progress, which affects all sectors of the internal market, may present challenges for consumers, especially in the area of trust. Consumers should be informed about how these systems function, how to reach a human with decision-making powers and how the system’s decisions can be checked and corrected. Being against an initial overregulation of AI, I supported the approach to first assess the current consumer protection EU legal framework, its implementation and enforcement, to see whether it is fit for the emergence of AI and automated decision-making while ensuring our fundamental rights.
Proposed mandate for negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (B9-0098/2020)
. ‒ I support Parliament’s position on the mandate for the EU’s negotiations with the UK. Going forward, I hope that we will obtain a strong, mutually beneficial relationship which enables the EU and the UK both to grow. We must also be vigilant as regards European citizens living in the UK, working to ensure that their rights continue to be respected.The next months will be crucial in determining the depth of our new relationship and I remain hopeful that a comprehensive trade agreement can be reached. There may be some difficult negotiations, but we must all remain aware that failure to agree a future relationship will be to the disadvantage of both the EU and the UK.
European Central Bank - annual report 2018 (A9-0016/2020 - Costas Mavrides)
The annual report on the activities of the European Central Bank for 2018 is on the whole reasonable. It emphasises the importance of the banking union in helping the European Union to reach economic growth targets as well as deepening the single market. I also appreciate that the ECB maintains a realistic outlook as regards inflation targets and interest rates.However, I was unable to support the report due to the emphasis on membership of the Eurozone and the issue of risk-sharing. I believe that Member States not yet members of the Eurozone should take their own decisions as to if and when to join the single currency. Furthermore, I worry that formal discussions and decisions regarding policies which will have an effect across the single market should not be taken in fora including only Eurozone members.
Allocation of slots at Community airports: common rules
I voted for the suspension of the rules for the allocation of slots at EU airports starting 1 March 2020. Furthermore, I voted for our amendment to extend the period of suspension not just until 30 June, as originally proposed by the Commission, but all the way till the end of the airport slot summer period, which is 24 October 2020. Due to the preventive governmental measures related to the coronavirus pandemic, the 80/20 rule, otherwise obligatory for the carriers, led to an absurd and undesirable situation which would have led to many flights being flown without passengers simply to fulfil the requirements of the Regulation to retain slots for the following period. It was only logical to suspend this rule until the situation stabilises.
Draft amending budget No 2/2020: Providing emergency support to Member States and further reinforcement of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak
Hlasoval jsem pro návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 2/2020 o poskytování mimořádné podpory členským státům a dalším posílení mechanismu civilní ochrany Unie/ rescEU v reakci na rozšíření onemocnění COVID-19. Jedná se o finanční pomoc v hodnotě tří miliard eur na podporu zdravotnictví. Z těchto prostředků bude financován a koordinován přeshraniční transport zdravotnického vybavení, převoz pacientů nebo navýšení testovacích kapacit. Jedná se o peníze poskládané z různých částí unijního rozpočtu na letošní rok a budou určeny konkrétně k nákupu např. ventilátorů nebo ochranných pomůcek, jako jsou roušky či respirátory, k již zmiňovanému transportu pacientů, k rozšiřování nemocničních kapacit nebo k vývoji léků a testovacích metod. To vše dle aktuálních potřeb členských států. Schválené opatření také umožní Komisi zadávat zakázky přímo jménem členských států a využít úspory z rozsahu.
Specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
Podpořil jsem změny v nařízeních týkajících se specifických opatření k zajištění mimořádné flexibility pro využití evropských strukturálních a investičních fondů v reakci na šíření onemocnění COVID-19. Změny přináší vyšší míru flexibility pro členské státy Evropské unie, maximální spolufinancování z evropského rozpočtu a menší administrativu. To považuji za naprosto zásadní v této ekonomicky velmi těžké době, kdy je potřeba zajistit likviditu podnikům, především malým a středním firmám, a tak udržet nad vodou nejen je, ale také jejich zaměstnance. Cílem tohoto specifického opatření je uvolnit co nejvíce finančních prostředků z různých unijních rozpočtových nástrojů, aby je mohly členské státy použít v co nejkratším čase, kde jsou potřeba.
Medical devices (C9-0098/2020)
Hlasoval jsem pro změnu nařízení o zdravotnických prostředcích ve smyslu data účinnosti některých jeho ustanovení. Odložení účinnosti o rok později na 26. května 2021 jsem považoval s ohledem na stávající situaci za nezbytné. Cílem původní normy bylo zajistit hladší fungovaní vnitřního trhu EU se zdravotnickými prostředky s ohledem na vysoký standard ochrany zdraví pacientů a uživatelů a na malé a střední podniky, které na tomto trhu působí. V současné krizové situaci by to však způsobilo velké problémy dotčeným subjektům včetně možného nedostatku zdravotnických pomůcek. V zájmu ochrany zdraví a nenarušení trhu s těmito prostředky jsem odklad účinnosti výše uvedeného nařízení podpořil.
Conclusion of the EU-Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement (A9-0084/2020 - Roberts Zīle)
Tato dohoda nahradí bilaterální dohody mezi Moldavskou republikou a jednotlivými členskými státy Evropské unie vytvořením společného leteckého prostoru mezi EU a jejími partnery z Východního partnerství. Zahrnuje postupné otevírání tras a kapacit, rovné podmínky pro všechny subjekty na základě našich evropských zásad a soulad moldavských leteckých norem s právními předpisy EU týkajícími se bezpečnosti nebo řízení leteckého provozu. Jako stínový zpravodaj v této věci jsem tedy naší skupině Renew Europe doporučil udělit souhlas s uzavřením této dohody.
Amendment of the EU-Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A9-0083/20202 - Roberts Zīle)
Protokol pouze bere v potaz přistoupení Chorvatska k EU v roce 2013 bez změny obsahu samotné dohody o společném leteckém prostoru mezi Evropskou unií a jejími členskými státy a Moldavskou republikou. Tato dohoda nahradí bilaterální dohody mezi Moldavskou republikou a jednotlivými členskými státy Evropské unie vytvořením společného leteckého prostoru mezi EU a jejími partnery z Východního partnerství. Zahrnuje postupné otevírání tras a kapacit, rovné podmínky pro všechny subjekty na základě našich evropských zásad a soulad moldavských leteckých norem s právními předpisy EU týkajícími se bezpečnosti nebo řízení leteckého provozu. S ohledem na výše uvedené jsem tedy coby stínový zpravodaj v této věci doporučil naší skupině Renew Europe s protokolem měnícím výše uvedenou dohodu souhlasit.
Amendment of the EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Bulgaria and Romania) (A9-0005/2020 - Sven Schulze)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí tohoto protokolu, protože se jedná o čistě technickou záležitost nahrazující výraz „Evropské společenství“ výrazem „Evropská unie“ v textu, kterým se mění Evropsko-středomořské letecká dohoda mezi EU a Marockým královstvím. Obsah protokolu zohledňoval vstup Bulharska a Rumunska do Evropské unie a byl schválen v roce 2007.
Conclusion of the EU-Jordan Euro-Mediterranean Aviation agreement (A9-0086/2020 - Andris Ameriks)
Hlasoval jsem pro udělení souhlasu s uzavřením Evropsko-středomořské letecké dohody mezi Evropskou unií a jejími členskými státy na jedné straně a Jordánským hášimovským královstvím na straně druhé, protože se jedná o čistě technickou změnu zohledňující Lisabonskou smlouvu a rozhodnutí Soudního dvora. Tato dohoda nahradí bilaterální dohody mezi Jordánskem a jednotlivými členskými státy Evropské unie vytvořením společného leteckého prostoru mezi EU a jejími partnery z Východního partnerství. Zahrnuje postupné otevírání tras a kapacit, rovné podmínky pro všechny subjekty na základě našich evropských zásad a soulad jordánských leteckých norem s právními předpisy EU týkajícími se bezpečnosti nebo řízení leteckého provozu.
Conclusion of the EU-China Civil Aviation Safety Agreement (A9-0087/2020 - Tomasz Piotr Poręba)
S uzavřením Dohody o bezpečnosti civilního letectví mezi Evropskou unií a vládou Čínské lidové republiky jsem souhlasil, protože zjednoduší obchod s letadly a leteckými výrobky a jejich certifikaci, a tím podpoří evropský letecký průmysl. Dohoda také zahrnuje rámec pro spolupráci v oblasti letecké bezpečnosti mezi oběma stranami.
Conclusion of the EU-Georgia Common Aviation Area Agreement (A9-0082/2020 - Andris Ameriks)
Conclusion of the EU-Israel Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A9-0085/2020 - Andor Deli)
Hlasoval jsem pro udělení souhlasu s uzavřením Evropsko-středomořské letecké dohody mezi Evropskou unií a jejími členskými státy na jedné straně a vládou Státu Izrael na straně druhé, protože napomáhá rozvoji cestovního ruchu, sbližování leteckých právních norem a v neposlední řadě posílení vztahů mezi Izraelem a zeměmi EU.
Recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (A9-0117/2020 - Kati Piri, Christophe Hansen)
V zájmu obou stran, Evropské unie i Velké Británie, je dosažení funkční dohody. Z pohledu České republiky jako proexportní země je určitě vítaná dohoda zahrnující veškeré klíčové oblasti. Velmi pozitivně vnímám odhodlání a ambiciózní přístup Evropské unie ohledně nastavení smysluplné spolupráce a uzavření dohody s Velkou Británií. V opačném případě by totiž nevyhnutelně vznikly významné překážky ve vzájemné spolupráci, dodatečné náklady či zvýšená administrativní zátěž pro podnikatele a obchodník. Pevně věřím, že se takovému scénáři budeme moci vyhnout.
Setting up a special committee on beating cancer, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0188/2020)
. – Hlasoval jsem pro zřízení zvláštního výboru Evropského parlamentu pro boj proti rakovině z velmi prostého důvodu. Na toto onemocnění zemře přes tři a půl tisíce občanů Evropské unie denně. To je populace malého města každý den. Zvážíme-li tato čísla ve světle současně probíhající koronavirové krize, musíme si přiznat, že jsme jako společnost k úmrtím způsobeným nádorovými onemocněními do jisté míry tolerantnější. Ale nemuselo by tomu tak být, podle odborníků lze 30 až 50 % případů předcházet, u některých, např. v České republice častých onemocnění, jako je kolorektální karcinom, se dá předejít až 95 % případům včasnou diagnózou. Proto jsem vznik zvláštního výboru podpořil, aby vyhodnotil, posoudil a doporučil veškerá možná opatření, která může Evropská unie v rámci svých kompetencí v této oblasti učinit, aby pomohla členským státům snižovat zdravotní, společenské i ekonomické dopady těchto onemocnění.
Setting up a special committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0190/2020)
Podpořil jsem zřízení zvláštního výboru Evropského parlamentu pro zahraniční vměšování do demokratických procesů v Evropské unii, včetně dezinformací, protože potřebujeme strategii, jak postupovat proti opakovanému a systematickému zahraničnímu vměšování, ať už státních či nestátních subjektů, do voleb, volebních kampaní a dalších demokratických procesů v Evropské unii a jejich členských státech. Jedná se zejména o dezinformační kampaně, kybernetické útoky, finanční podporu, ale i nátlak na politické aktéry a obecně podrývání demokratické občanské společnosti.
Setting up a special committee on artificial intelligence in a digital age, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0189/2020)
Hlasoval jsem pro zřízení zvláštního výboru Evropského parlamentu pro umělou inteligenci v digitálním věku. Nejen ze současné práce stálých výborů je zřejmé, že umělá inteligence a digitální transformace obecně bude mít dopad na všechny oblasti našeho hospodářství a společnosti. Zvláštní výbor jsme pověřili, aby vyhodnotil budoucí dopad AI na naše hospodářství i fungování společnosti, aby analyzoval relevantní legislativní situaci na globální mezinárodní úrovni v této problematice a aby předložil stálým výborům Evropského parlamentu závěry a doporučení, jak dále postupovat ve střednědobém i dlouhodobém horizontu. Práce tohoto výboru samozřejmě musí brát v potaz současnou aktivitu Evropské komise a členských států v oblasti digitální transformace a umělé inteligence.
Situation in the Schengen area following the Covid-19 outbreak (B9-0165/2020)
Na začátku pandemie COVID-19 jednotlivé členské státy unilaterálně obnovily hraniční kontroly a postupně i došlo k úplnému uzavření hranic. Evropská unie se s podobnou situací, jakou byla koronavirová krize doposud nesetkala, a bylo proto logické, že byla přijata řada mimořádných opatření. A to včetně možných negativních dopadů, zejména na přeshraniční pracovníky, dopravce a v celkovém ohledu i na správné fungování jednotného trhu. I z tohoto důvodů je vítané, že země EU přistoupily ke koordinovanému postupu při postupném uvolňování přeshraničního pohybu, který je klíčový pro podporu hospodářské obnovy, ale také z hlediska možností a příležitostí, které skýtá schengenský prostor z hlediska fungování EU.
Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2454 as regards the dates of application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0123/2020 - Luděk Niedermayer)
Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States were forced to adjust their sets of priorities and their financial budgets in a way they could promptly respond to the ongoing crisis. Similar changes have therefore also occurred in relation to the dates of application of the new VAT e-commerce package. Although several Member States are prepared to apply the measures as of January 1, 2021, there are serious concerns that some other economic operators may have difficulty in applying them correctly. Therefore, it would be better for the package to be postponed by no more than 3 months, which I see as adequate and sufficient time to guarantee the correct application. A well-functioning internal market, guaranteed competitiveness, and the transition to digitalisation are key for the European Union. I, therefore, voted for the proposal to postpone the application of the regulation.
Ειδικοί κανόνες για την απόσπαση οδηγών στον τομέα των οδικών μεταφορών και απαιτήσεις επιβολής (A9-0114/2020 - Kateřina Konečná) (A9-0114/2020 - Kateřina Konečná)
I voted in favour of this proposal because I think it is very important to adopt a clear legal framework, which defines rules for posting workers. The different application of the rules by the Member States causes not only an increased administrative burden but also unnecessary chaos and additional problems in the performance of the transport sector employees. Fair remuneration for drivers and increased social protection are important for all employees within the European Union, and drivers are no exceptions. The use of digital tools will help drivers to reduce red tape and time spent behind the wheel. Less frequent, but more targeted and effective controls where needed are crucial.
Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (A9-0115/2020 - Henna Virkkunen)
. ‒ Given that several shortcomings have been identified in the application of the social protection for road transport workers, it is important to support this proposal and address this issue. Every worker deserves decent conditions in the performance of their work. I am pleased that the adoption of this legislative proposal will improve the overall working conditions of road transport workers. Not only will drivers have better access to parking spaces, sanitation and catering facilities, but they will also spend more time with their families during a well-deserved break. Ensuring fair remuneration for all drivers is another benefit of the proposal. The better the working conditions, the better the road safety and overall psychological comfort of the driver.
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A9-0116/2020 - Ismail Ertug)
. ‒ I supported this proposal because I think it is very important to limit the performance of systematic cabotage that reduces fair competition and undermines the level playing field and overall access to the internal market for new entrepreneurs. The time limit, which constrains the driver to set off on the next journey, additionally promotes drivers’ rest and a guarantee to spend more time with a family. I am pleased that the European Union has stepped up against the phenomenon of the so-called letterbox companies. Such illegal practices have no place in the European Union. Once again, digitisation and the introduction of tachographs will help us to monitor enforcement of the new rules and combat fraud.
Humanitarian situation in Venezuela and migration and refugee crisis (RC-B9-0211/2020, B9-0211/2020, B9-0212/2020, B9-0213/2020, B9-0214/2020, B9-0215/2020)
The European Union is based on different values, including the protection of human rights, respect for freedom, equality, and the rule of law. In order to create a globally stable environment, it is important to spread these democratic values further, not only to neighbouring countries but if possible to the whole world too. It is very sad that in the 21st century we are witnessing such a widespread internal political and economic crisis in Venezuela. It caused a huge humanitarian and migration crisis that lead to forced displacement, deaths of large numbers of people, and an overall weakening of global stability and peace. The European Union must emphasize a disagreement and a regret of Madura’s regime, but most importantly, it must call for the others to recognize legitimately appointed representatives who will contribute to resolving the ongoing crisis. Therefore, I have no choice but to express support for this proposal.
Conclusion of an EU - New Zealand agreement, under negotiation, on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino)
I am pleased that the European Union has a desire and a will to work with other countries in the fight against serious crime and terrorism that will help the EU to further protect its security interests. We have witnessed several terrorist attacks in the past. The seriousness of this issue therefore can’t be called into question. Active cooperation with other countries and pre-emptive action is important to prevent or at least to reduce terrorist activity and planned attacks. Concerning personal data protection, not only is maximum protection the key but also the principle of minimalism should be guaranteed. The information provided should be limited to what is necessary and inevitable and the level of data protection should be essentially equivalent to the level of protection provided by EU law. The common interest to fight against serious crime and terrorism is a precondition for fruitful discussion and active cooperation that will bring an incredible number of benefits.
Type approval of motor vehicles (Real Driving Emissions) (A9-0139/2020 - Esther de Lange)
Návrh o schvalování typu motorových vozidel z hlediska emisí z lehkých osobních vozidel a z užitkových vozidel (Euro 5 a Euro 6) nastavuje podmínky pro schvalování typu motorových vozidel a upravuje zejména měření reálných emisí. Hlasoval jsem proti pozměněnému návrhu Evropského parlamentu. Z expertního přezkoumání vyplývá, že zavedením pravidel o přípustné chybovosti měření v relativně krátké době vytváří nadměrnou administrativní a technickou zátěž oproti původnímu návrhu předloženému Evropskou komisí. Evropská legislativa by měla být efektivní a předvídatelná a nepřidávat zbytečnou administrativní zátěž. Proto jsem hlasoval proti pozměněnému návrhu a byl jsem pro zachování původního návrhu.
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)
Fond pro spravedlivou transformaci je klíčový nástroj politiky klimatické neutrality, jejímž cílem je zajistit spravedlivý přechod regionům, které jsou závislé na fosilních palivech. Země, které čelí největším problémům při transformaci, budou mít z Fondu pro spravedlivou transformaci největší prospěch. V Česku budou finance z transformačního fondu určeny pro uhelné regiony – Moravskoslezský, Ústecký a Karlovarský kraj. Takové oblasti potřebují na transformaci dostatek prostředků, ze kterých by financovaly nejen proměnu energetického mixu, ale také tvorbu nových pracovních míst a rekvalifikaci občanů, kteří v důsledku transformace ztratí své zaměstnání. Proto jsem podpořil tento návrh.
Situation in Belarus
Hlasoval jsem pro usnesení EP, které neuznává výsledek běloruských prezidentských voleb. Usnesení také odsuzuje a vyzývá k potrestání násilného potlačení protestů opozice. Silné volání veřejnosti po skutečně svobodných volbách nelze ignorovat. Z Evropy podporujeme občanskou společnost a stojíme s Bělorusy. Aktuální dění v Bělorusku není geopoliticky motivované, ale jde o právo občanů na spravedlivé a nezávislé volby, které by mělo být dodrženo.
Situation in Russia, the poisoning of Alexei Navalny
Evropský parlament důrazně odsuzuje pokus o vraždu Alexeje Navalného, který byl otráven vojenskou chemickou nervově paralytickou látkou typu „novičok“. Pokus o vraždu ruského občana se odehrál na území Ruské federace. Ruská vláda musí učinit vše, co je v jejích silách, aby tento trestný čin důkladně a zcela transparentně vyšetřila a postavila odpovědné osoby před soud. Hlasoval jsem pro usnesení, protože pokus o vraždu je v dnešním světě absolutně nepřípustný, a to více pokus o vraždu s politickým motivem.
European Climate Law (A9-0162/2020 - Jytte Guteland)
Hlasoval jsem proti návrhu klimatického práva z důvodu příliš vysokého cíle na snížení emisí do roku 2050. Evropský parlament navrhuje snížení o 60 % do roku 2030 a karbonovou neutralitu do roku 2050. Což je další navýšení ambicí oproti předchozímu návrhu Komise. Tento cíl je v praxi nereálný pro země jako Česká republika, které musí nejprve snížit závislost na fosilních palivech a přeorientovat ekonomiku na čistější zdroje. Taková transformace potřebuje více času. Dále nesouhlasím se založením nového orgánu Rady pro klimatické změny. Místo navyšování unijní byrokracie bychom raději měli zefektivnit práci již stávajících orgánů.
The European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward (A9-0154/2020 - Petri Sarvamaa)
Zpráva o Evropské strategii v oblasti lesnictví se vyslovuje pro přijetí ambiciózní a komplexní evropské strategie v oblasti lesnictví, která rovněž respektuje sociální, environmentální i ekonomické aspekty. Hlasoval jsem pro návrh, protože slučuje evropskou rámcovou strategii s dílčími strategiemi členských států, které zohledňují konkrétní dané podmínky v jednotlivých zemích.
Digital Finance: emerging risks in crypto-assets - regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets (A9-0161/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
. ‒ I am proud to have led the process on drafting this report, which covers a number of different areas in digital finance, including how to deal with crypto-assets, ensure the digital operational resilience of our banks and businesses, and also to ensure that the vast swathes of data within the EU are able to be used, but not abused. The report is a legislative initiative report, which compels the Commission to take action on a number of fronts. I am pleased to see that already the Commission has proposed a framework for the crypto-asset market and for digital operational resilience. Furthermore, I was encouraged by the comments of Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis in the plenary, where he committed to putting forward proposals on digital onboarding and also to examine how to harmonise digital financial identities in Europe. These measures are important elements in ensuring that European citizens can have access to financial services across the EU as a whole. I, of course, voted in favour of the report.
Further development of the Capital Markets Union (CMU): improving access to capital market finance, in particular by SMEs, and further enabling retail investor participation (A9-0155/2020 - Isabel Benjumea Benjumea)
It is time to further develop our capital markets in Europe, for a number of reasons, not least to diversify sources of funding for our businesses, particularly our SMEs. To do so, we need to work on a number of different aspects of our financial framework, from markets infrastructure right down through to financial education for start-up business. This report offers a number of practical solutions and proposals to improve the state of capital markets in Europe, and to make it a true capital markets union, rather than 27 individual capital markets, which is key in order for our businesses, and particularly our SMEs to tap into a deep and liquid pool of funding. I therefore supported this report.
Recommendation to the Council and the VPC/HR concerning the Implementation and governance of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) (A9-0165/2020 - Radosław Sikorski)
I voted for the report because I strongly believe that PESCO should stand at the forefront of supporting EU military and defence cooperation and streamlining the efficiency of defence production. In this regard, PESCO can strongly contribute to fomenting greater coordination, coherence and interoperability in security and defence matters, while strengthening solidarity and resilience among Member States. What I particularly welcome in the report is the fact that it clearly underscores that PESCO does not in any way call into question defence cooperation at the NATO level but rather will complement projects already planned at the NATO level.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the VPC/HR on relations with Belarus (A9-0167/2020 - Petras Auštrevičius)
I admire the determination and perseverance of the peaceful Belarus demonstrators who face threats, intimidation and violence without falling into provocation. Against repression and instigation the Belarusian people are taking a stand for their freedom and their right to decide on the issues that shape their future. The rule of Law, Freedom and Democratic Values are part of the acquis of the European Union so we have to do everything in our power to help the Belarusian people on their way to democracy. This is why I am glad that the European Parliament has endorsed this Resolution since is a sign of our firm position against human rights violations by the state authorities in Belarus. I voted in favour of the report since it not only supports the people of Belarus in their legitimate demands for new free and fair elections but also calls for the imposition of restrictive measures against those responsible for repression and intimidation.
Recommendation to the VPC/HR and to the Council in preparation of the 10th Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT) review process, nuclear arms control and nuclear disarmament options (A9-0020/2020 - Sven Mikser)
I support European Parliament’s recommendations to the regular review process under the Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT) and I strongly support all the points in the recommendation. The NPT is a bulwark of global strategic stability and a cornerstone against the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. The future of the NPT can no longer be taken for granted. A clear commitment by all States is needed. Selective implementation of the Treaty or non-compliance by some States undermines confidence in the entire NPT system. In this respect, the report failed to clearly mention that one of the founding parties of the NPT is not following the spirit of denuclearisation, and I believe that the international community should stand more wary of the reports of growing nuclear proliferation in China.
Introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process (A9-0175/2020 - Emmanuel Maurel)
The EU is the Western Balkans’ leading trade partner with over 72% of the total trade. Through The Stabilisation and Association Agreements (SAAs) as part of the Stabilisation and Association Process with the Western Balkan partners, EU supports their economic integration. These instruments allow the suspension of the specific trade-duties normally applied, contribute to the economic development and political stabilisation of the region and constitute a core mechanism for their alignment with the EU acquis and progressive integration into the EU market. Therefore, I voted for the extension by five more years of these measures since they will ensure stable market access conditions for economic operators both in the region and in the EU.
EU/China Agreement: cooperation on and protection of geographical indications (A9-0199/2020 - Iuliu Winkler)
. ‒ This agreement is a crucial step to protect the know-how of European products and ensure that they are properly labelled, with their origins indicated, and therefore to support our European farmers on the global market, particularly against wrongful uses of geographical indications. It provides protection for 100 Geographical Indications concerning agri-food products, wines and spirits on each side. The agreement will therefore give a new impetus to the strong rise in EU exports to the Chinese market. I welcome the EU-China Agreement as a means to stronger cooperation in trade and more exports of European products to China in the future.
Common system of value added tax: identification of taxable persons in Northern Ireland (A9-0200/2020 - Irene Tinagli)
. ‒ After Brexit the EU’s VAT regime legislation will no longer apply to the UK. However, as part of the EU’s longstanding commitment to ensuring a lasting peaceful settlement in Northern Ireland, the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration agreed between the UK and the EU both emphasised the importance of avoiding a hard border on the island of Ireland between Ireland and Northern Ireland after Brexit. From that perspective and in accordance with the Irish Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreement, it is important that taxable persons are identified in Northern Ireland via a separate EU VAT identification number.EU VAT identification numbers play an important role in the functioning of the EU VAT system in order to justify the exemption for so-called ‘intra-Community supplies’ of goods. With that purpose, I voted for the amendment that under a simplified procedure will allow a quick adoption well on time before 1 January 2021. It also demonstrates the EU’s will that despite Brexit, there should be as smooth a transition as possible for communities on both sides of the border in Ireland.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections (A9-0206/2020 - Pierre Larrouturou, Olivier Chastel)
The new EU budget will pave the way for solid European prosperity. This agreement will make possible not only to mitigate and recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic but also to transform our economy around the Green Deal and the Digital Agenda. I warmly welcome the key budgetary lines of the financial package that will mobilise investment, particularly for SMEs, and financial support in the areas of digitalisation, research, education and climate protection. This will help the Union to build its resilience and better support our healthcare professionals, our youth and our entrepreneurs as well as protecting our borders.
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to strengthen the European Union’s capacities and resources to respond to major health threats, such as epidemics. With this purpose in mind, EU4Health pursues a better cross-border response coordination so that the tools for research and procurement of vaccines and medicines are available, making them accessible to all Europeans. Therefore, the EU4Health programme will ensure better healthcare for all European citizens for both sanitary crises and non-communicable and rare diseases.I am particularly pleased that, in the context of the agreement reached on the MFF, the European Parliament has managed to triple the EU4Health budget up to EUR 3.4 billion.
Sustainable Europe Investment Plan - How to finance the Green Deal (A9-0198/2020 -Siegfried Mureşan, Paul Tang)
In order to truly reach the ambitious objectives of the European Green Deal, the transition towards a green economy must be sustainable not only environmentally, but also socio—economically. SEIP will make a significant financial contribution to the transition towards a more a sustainable, competitive, resource—efficient, circular and resilient economy, putting Europe on the path of becoming the first climate—neutral continent by 2050. Nevertheless, I could not support this report given that in my view the report at times overreached its scope, particularly as regards the purposes and relevance of the Taxonomy Regulation to certain aspects of the SEIP. Furthermore, I am sceptical of the broad spectrum of own resources suggested; the question of what own resources will be raised by the Union, and in what manner, remain to be answered in the context of the next MFF and for future funding within the EU.
InvestEU Programme (A9-203/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Irene Tinagli)
The European Union needs to provide adequate support to companies hit by the COVID—19 crisis, safeguarding employment levels and ensuring the long—term competitiveness of our economy in its long—term green and digital transition. With InvestEU, we could better support EU investors by integrating and simplifying the financing offered under a single budgetary guarantee scheme. I supported the InvestEU Programme as it will not only contribute to a sustainable economic recovery but will also better address market failures and sub—optimal investments, with consequent tangible effects for European SMEs which face considerable challenges in accessing market finance. Furthermore, as the successor to the EFSI, InvestEU can considerably increase access to equity financing for innovative start—ups and scale—ups by providing a public guarantee on investments. This can help to crowd in investors and give promising European businesses the opportunities they need to grow and become stories of success.
Strengthening media freedom: the protection of journalists in Europe, hate speech, disinformation and the role of platforms (A9-0205/2020 - Magdalena Adamowicz)
Media freedom and pluralism are essential tenets of free and democratic societies. Therefore, the strengthening of the freedom of the media, the protection of journalists as well as combating disinformation and hate speech both online and offline are key priorities in safeguarding freedom of expression and of the press. This report sends a clear message to the Commission by requesting it to put forward stronger mechanisms to improve the protection of our journalists and to strengthen protections around freedom of expression. The report also proposes specific aid for independent media in countries where the economic impact of the pandemic jeopardises a pluralist media landscape. With the adoption of this report, the European Parliament sends a clear message that freedom of expression and freedom of information must not be compromised.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Lead in gunshot in or around wetlands (B9-0365/2020)
Podpořil jsem předloženou námitku Evropské komise mimo jiné proto, že návrh Evropské komise na definici mokřadů, která se vztahuje k využívání olova v brocích v mokřadech nebo kolem nich, považuji za velmi problematický. Rozšíření definice mokřadů je velmi extenzivní a vzniká tak právní nejistota pro občany. V obecném duchu považuji navržená omezení za nepřiměřená. Souhlasím s tím, že je třeba věnovat pozornost ochraně životního prostředí a zachování biodiverzity. Dle mého názoru však není záhodno vytvářet legislativu, u které vzniká nejistota nad tím, jak ji vymáhat a dodržovat.
Temporary measures in relation to value added tax for COVID-19 vaccines and in vitro diagnostic medical devices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (C9-0352/2020)
I am pleased that the European Parliament approved the reduction in the VAT rate for vaccines and COVID test materials. Reduced VAT will cut costs for suppliers, healthcare providers and customers, speed up the distribution of the vaccine and serve as a tool to avoid dis-incentivising citizens from getting a vaccine and a test to help prevent the spread of the COVID virus where it is not provided for free. As products utilised for public good, it makes sense to ensure that sales taxes are not applied to testing materials and vaccines, particularly in the context of the pandemic, which is causing profound social and economic effects across the EU. For these reasons I had no hesitation in supporting the reduction of VAT rates for these purposes.
EU Trade Policy Review (B9-0370/2020)
I welcome this review since trade has the potential to contribute to the resilience of the EU economy, positively impact our relationship with third countries and also promote both our interests and core values to the wider world. Trade policy can reinforce our competitiveness and maximise the benefits of globalisation for our businesses, consumers and workers, while protecting them from unfair practices. Greater access to global markets also plays a significant role in SME growth; however, smaller businesses often find it difficult to access the benefits of preferential trade agreements negotiated by the EU. Therefore, going forward we must ensure that one of our key priorities is to ensure that SMEs can be greater beneficiaries of trade agreements.
Conclusion of the EU-Japan Civil Aviation Safety Agreement (A9-0239/2020 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
I voted to approve the agreement that will enhance cooperation between the EU and Japan in the area of civil aviation safety. Under this beneficial agreement the EU and Japan accept common safety standards for private and commercial aviation that will avoid unnecessary duplications in administrative procedures, saving time and costs for the respective civil aviation authorities, while the common rules will facilitate cooperation for both partners, boosting opportunities for companies to invest and grow. The Agreement will particularly benefit European companies, which manufacture aeronautical parts, as they will have easier access to the Japanese market and therefore can increase their presence in the Japan. Overall, I welcome this agreement as evidence of the further strengthening of the EU’s relations with Japan, a strong ally in defending the rules-based international order.
European Year of Rail (2021) (A9-0191/2020 - Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg)
Podpořil jsem vyhlášení roku 2021 Evropským rokem železnice. Věřím, že tato iniciativa přispěje k dalšímu rozvoji a budování železničních spojení v rámci Evropské unie. Železniční přeprava přináší řadu výhod. Je to moderní, bezpečný a ekologický způsob přepravy. I proto považuji za důležité pokračovat ve výstavbě sítí TEN-T, v posilování infrastruktury, ale také například v digitalizaci integrovaného systému nákupu jízdenek online a integraci evropského systému řízení železničního provozu (ERTMS). Rovněž bychom se měli zaměřit na zlepšení přeshraničních spojení a investice s tím spojené. Vítám jak tuto iniciativu, tak i ambice EU v oblasti udržitelné a chytré mobility. Jsem přesvědčen, že podpora a rozvoj železnice přispěje také k cílům v oblasti digitální transformaci či politiky klimatu.
MFF, Rule of Law Conditionality and Own Resources (B9-0428/2020, B9-0429/2020)
Hlasoval jsem pro víceletý finanční rámec EU, který stanovuje příjmy a výdaje EU na příštích sedm let. Tento rozpočet ve výši 1,074 miliardy EUR se zaměřuje zejména na financování priorit, jako jsou modernizace, digitalizace a přechod k udržitelnému hospodářství. Společně s fondem obnovy, který byl vytvořen jako odpověď na krizi způsobenou globální pandemií, přiděluje finance do různých odvětví. Česko je v pozici tzv. čistého příjemce. To znamená, že z rozpočtu EU můžeme čerpat více, než do něj odvádíme. Z nového rozpočtu bude Česká republika moci vyčerpat s využitím různých fondů celkem až 960 miliard korun. Největší část prostředků, které Česká republika získá, jde skrze evropské strukturální fondy a Fond soudružnosti. Ty napomáhají k vyrovnávání regionálních rozdílů v EU. Díky nim realizujeme projekty jako posílení rozvoje a podpora malých a středních podniků, zvýšení kompetencí a znalostí lidí bez práce či zkvalitnění životního prostředí v našich městech. Velká část fondů jde také na podporu zemědělství a rozvoj venkova. Přijatý rozpočet bude v platnosti jak pro období krize, tak i v době ekonomické obnovy. Musíme zajistit, že jej využijeme co nejlépe, abychom znovu nastartovali naši ekonomiku.
Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation (A9-0245/2020 - Fabienne Keller)
Although I agree with the objective of the report to assess the implementation of the Dublin III Regulation, especially in the light of the forthcoming reform of the EU asylum system I was unable to support the final text. I consider the report in parts could better reflect the mutual ambition across the EU to find a comprehensive solution, which will avoid a situation similar to what we witnessed at the height of the migration crisis, rather than criticising the different approaches to the issue by member states.
Implementation of the Return Directive (A9-0238/2020 - Tineke Strik)
Effectively returning irregular migrants is one of the key pillars of the European Union’s migration policy. I welcome that the Report evaluates the implementation of the Return Directive with the aim to promote an effective return policy in line with adequate procedural safeguards and fundamental rights. However, I did not support the Report as, in my view; it did not sufficiently address how to substantially reduce the length of return procedures. The Return Directive lays down many ex-ante conditions for returns, establishing therefore bureaucratic hurdles, which make the process less effective. The return of non-EU nationals arriving in the Union without legal grounds and with the aim of remaining for an indefinite period in Europe should be carried out effectively, avoiding excessively prolonged and resource-intensive processes, while ensuring full respect of the fundamental rights of the concerned person.
EU Security Union Strategy (B9-0421/2020)
New cross-border and cross-sectorial security threats have emerged in recent years, stressing the need to strengthen the security foundations of the EU, particularly in our physical and digital environments, and to reinforce cooperation and information sharing between the EU, Member States and their relevant security authorities. This strategy lays out the tools and measures to be developed over the next five years in order to ensure a future-proof security policy, protecting Europeans from terrorism, cybercrime, hybrid threats and disinformation, while emphasising the key role of Europol and the potential evolution of the responsibilities of the EPPO. Therefore, I support the EU Security Union Strategy as it provides appropriate responses for effectively addressing the continuously developing threats, helping to build a security ecosystem that covers the entire breadth of the European landscape.
Air connectivity following the end of the transition period with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (C9-0398/2020 - Johan Danielsson)
. – I support this Regulation, a contingency measure that would allow the European air transport sector to continue to function without interruption in the case of a Brexit without an accompanying free trade agreement. This measure is proposed as a stop-gap to ensure the continuation of basic air connectivity between the EU and the UK of goods and people, and will last until June 2021. This is necessary due to the fact that in the absence of a deal, under the current EU legal framework, there would be no legal basis for the provision of air services between the United Kingdom and the Member States.The effects for the respective economies would be severe. The resulting barriers would hamper the flow of goods and passengers not just between the EU and the UK, but also with distant markets due to the need for EU carriers to use UK airspace to fly to many destinations in and beyond the west of Europe. As a result, other sectors largely dependent on air transport would be hit.With this Regulation, the EU will lay down temporary measures in order to ensure continuity and preserve essential air connectivity with the UK for the benefit of passengers and the aviation industry.
Technical Support Instrument (A9-0173/2020 - Alexandra Geese, Othmar Karas, Dragoș Pîslaru)
The Technical Support Instrument (TSI) will assist the Member States in their preparation and implementation of the Recovery and Resilience plans needed to access funding from the Recovery and Resilience Facility. A successful emergence from the crisis requires a coordinated response from Member States and for that purpose, the TSI provides a framework to identify national reform priorities and mechanisms to monitor its implementation. The TSI also sets out a list of key actions to be carried out to foster investment, to create high-quality jobs, to strengthen the adjustment capacity and reinforce the digitalisation of administrative structures and public services. This will help to boost the economic recovery from COVID-19. Therefore, I welcome this instrument as it will support Member States to access relevant funds to their recovery plans and will also make sure they are invested in appropriate reforms in line with the twin digital and environmental transitions.
Strengthening the single market: the future of free movement of services (A9-0250/2020 - Morten Løkkegaard)
. ‒ The services sector is an essential driving force of economic growth in the European Union. It accounts for three-quarters of our economy. Unfortunately, its full potential still remains untapped and it is currently under immense strain from the pandemic. Promoting the single market, including the free, fair and safe movement of services and people will enhance the competitiveness of EU businesses in global markets and strongly contribute to the COVID-19 recovery. However, red tape, insufficient implementation of single market rules and unjustified regulatory restrictions to access regulated professions deprive citizens of jobs, consumers of choices, and entrepreneurs of opportunities.I voted in favour of this report as it aims to improve the free movement of services within the single market by ensuring the enforcement of existing EU legislation, by addressing national hurdles, and finally by providing an evaluation of how open Member States are in terms of trade performance.
Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law (A9-0001/2021 - Gilles Lebreton)
Zprávu o užití technologií umělé inteligence v civilním a také vojenském sektoru jsem podpořil. Navazuje na již schválenou zprávu k etickým aspektům užití AI. Hlavním sdělení této zprávy je požadavek na respektování principů základních lidských práv, na odpovědnost a plnou kontrolu ze strany provozovatele technologie. Zpráva rovněž vyzývá k diskuzi o samotném použití umělé inteligence v oblasti zbraňových systémů na bázi AI. Nejsem v zásadě proti použití, ale s podmínkou, že je vždy přítomna lidská kontrola u použití této technologie v oblasti obrany a bezpečnosti.
Connectivity and EU-Asia relations (A9-0269/2020 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
The COVID-19 recovery is an opportunity to achieve Europe’s ambition: a strengthened role in global politics as a geopolitical and geo-economic actor. Connectivity invigorates our competitiveness and provides new commercial opportunities, fostering prosperity, notably for SMEs. However, the economic potential between Europe and Asia – our biggest trade partner – remains untapped, due to a lack of physical and digital infrastructure bringing the two continents together. I supported this report, which calls for a comprehensive strategy based on the EU’s fundamental values: a strategy aligned with our key priorities, such as the digital transformation, the green transition, and trade, investment and competitiveness policies. Furthermore, I am in favour of helping our businesses broaden their global business opportunities through facilitating investment and exports. I believe that financing, advice and the implementation of projects seeking to deepen ties between Europe and Asia will be of economic and political benefit to all sides.
Markets in financial instruments (A9-0208/2020 - Markus Ferber)
In order for our securities markets to be able to adjust to the post-pandemic environment and help the recovery, it’s necessary to make some small changes to the rules in order to remove some of the burdens associated with the MIFID framework. The requirements removed will not, in my view, reduce retail investor protection, and in some instances are just a case of making secondary laws into primary laws. Furthermore, the tweaks to the legislation will help to make the EU more competitive on the global markets, which is also something which must be borne in mind when it comes to the MiFID review due within the next year. Finally, the rules on payments for research on SMEs will bring greater visibility to Europe's small and medium-sized companies, helping them to get much needed investment. For these reasons I supported the agreement.
Slot utilisation rules at Union airports: temporary relief (C9-0420/2020)
The COVID-19 outbreak had a detrimental impact on air carriers’ traffic with a significant decline in a slot utilisation rate, falling far below 80% threshold as imposed by the Slots Regulation. To this effect, under the new provisions, Carriers will be required to fulfil at least half of their flight plans to be entitled to use the same series slots in the next equivalent scheduling period (this is their permission to use the airport infrastructure necessary for landing and taking-off on a specific date and time). Carriers will also be able to return up to 50% of their slots at the start of the summer or winter scheduling season to secure them for the following season. I voted in favour of this Regulation that sets up a transitional regime for one year that will allow air companies to re-establish their service in accordance with the levels of demand. It will help to prevent ‘ghost flights’, making sure that slots are used efficiently and are distributed equitably. The Regulation will help airlines access new markets while ensuring the protection of a fair number of slots, bringing back competition in the sector while contributing to the economic recovery.
Temporary measures concerning the validity of certificates and licences (Omnibus II) (C9-0004/2021)
Extraordinary circumstances caused by the COVID-19 outbreak have a significant impact on our day-to-day activities. This makes it difficult for transport operators, other persons concerned and the competent authorities of Member States to process the formalities required to comply with the obligations established by Union law regarding the renewal of driving and boat masters’ licences, roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers, driver attestations for the provisions of road haulage services, rail single safety certificates or authorisations, or port security assessments, etc. I voted in favour of this regulation, as it will extend the validity of certificates, licences and authorisations, while postponing some periodic checks and training in the area of road, rail and inland waterway transport and maritime security. This regulation will therefore provide legal certainty and ensure the continuity of transport services and mobility to avoid possible disruption in internal market.
EU Association Agreement with Ukraine (A9-0219/2020 - Michael Gahler)
The EU Association Agreement with Ukraine is a reflection of the shared ambition between both parties to move towards political association, the promotion of economic integration and respect for common values. With that purpose, the agreement draws a roadmap for reforms in many areas, such as energy, health or education. While Ukraine has made substantial progress in the implementation of its commitments, the full potential of the reforms adopted is still not harnessed, in particular in the areas of the rule of law, good governance and anti-corruption. I therefore support this report that urges Ukraine to advance in its pro-democratic and judicial reforms. Furthermore, the report condemns the ongoing Russian military aggression against the Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty in the east of the country and Crimea, and reiterates the European Parliament’s support for the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
The situation in Myanmar (B9-0116/2021)
Since the military seized power in a coup on 1 February 2021 after the National League for Democracy Party (NLD) won the elections, Myanmar has been suffering systematic and severe human rights violations perpetrated against peaceful protesters, politicians, journalists and the Rohingya community as well as other minorities. I strongly condemn the actions taken by the military in Myanmar and support the resolution through which the European Parliament calls on the military to respect the outcome of the democratic elections, to end the state of emergency declared, to release all political prisoners and reinstate the democratically elected government and the constitutional order. Furthermore, the resolution calls on the military to allow independent and impartial investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations. Parliament also urges the EU to increase pressure and take action by adopting targeted sanctions against those who are responsible for the coup.
InvestEU Programme (A9-0203/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Irene Tinagli)
InvestEU is an essential element to ensure more investment into the European economy, in particular for SMEs, enabling them not only to recover from this Pandemic but also to continue to grow, innovate, to remain competitive and create jobs. InvestEU will bring together the 14 EU financial instruments currently available, intending to guarantee crucial financial support to our companies, guarantying that the investment is channelled to where is needed while also ensuring the policy objectives of the EU. These objectives are captured in the four policy windows dedicated to 1) sustainable infrastructure, 2) research, innovation and digitisation, 3) SMEs, 4) social investment and skills. The InvestEU Fund will mobilise public and private investment through Financial Institutions, who will drive the reorientation of capital towards sustainable investments in accordance with the Union’s objectives, therefore making part of the recovery. With InvestEU we reinforce our capacity to deploy strategic public and private investment to support our businesses access liquidity in these difficult times and to kick-start economic recovery.
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
With a budget of €5.1 billion, EU4Health marks the first step towards a true European Health Union. With The EU4Health Programme the EU would not only strengthen its capacity to respond major health crises in the future but will also support Member States in their efforts to reform their health systems in order to become more resilient and digitalised, in particular through the creation of a European e-health record and the health data space future platform. The EU4Health also sets out key action measures to address vaccine hesitancy, medicine shortages, to bring back the production of medicines to Europe and to fight against non-communicable and rare diseases.There is still unequal access to health services in the EU. The EU4Health programme also addresses these inequalities by identifying the existing gaps. Accordingly, I strongly embrace EU4Health Programme that will ensure a better healthcare for all European Citizens and target EU long-term health challenges.
A WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (A9-0019/2021 - Yannick Jadot)
The Carbon Border Adjustment (CBAM) aims to secure our climate policies through an effective carbon price, while counteracting the risk of carbon leakage. Carbon leakage occurs when the costs of climate action leads production to shift outside the EU to countries with laxer climate legislation, resulting in an overall increase in emissions. To address this risk, CBAM should introduce a price on the greenhouse gas emissions corresponding to EU carbon pricing on domestic emissions and in compliance with WTO rules. This report is the EP’s input into the preparatory work of the Commission on the CBAM which calls for measures guaranteeing a level playing field, making sure we do not have unfair competition from outside the EU, stimulating industries and also promoting environmental standards outside the Union.
Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (A9-0015/2021 - Sven Giegold)
Previous Directives on Administrative Cooperation (‘DAC’) laid down a framework to exchange information in different tax fields between the tax administrations of the Member States in order to detect tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance. With the aim to ensure fair taxation, DAC 7 extends these EU tax transparency rules to digital platforms. Digitisation is a cornerstone of the Union’s Economic Recovery Strategy. However, digital goods and services are more intangible and, as a consequence, generate revenues more prone to be weakly reported and thus at risk of remaining under-taxed or untaxed, distorting competition. Therefore, we need taxation in line with the current times. With DAC 7, digital platforms are now also included in the scope of European Tax Cooperation. I welcome DAC 7, as these new fiscal transparency rules will help to change this imbalance and achieve a level playing field, building a fairer tax system that fits the digital age.
Shaping digital education policy (A9-0042/2021 - Victor Negrescu)
Universal access to quality education and training significantly boosts the personal development prospects of citizens. In the context of the Pandemic, digital education is a key enabler of research and innovation, fostering economic growth and social cohesion. The Digital Education Action Plan is an important step towards a holistic education and digital skills strategy. This crisis has proven that the use of distance and online learning is essential to ensure the continuity of education and training provision. However, the shift to online learning has aggravated some existing disparities, thus leaving disadvantaged and vulnerable learners behind. I supported this Report as it urges the deployment of the necessary infrastructure universally, making it accessible to more, particularly disadvantaged, learners. It also calls for more funding to achieve this and calls on the Commission and the Member States to put in place inclusive measures that ensure all population groups can fully reap the benefits of the digital transition regardless of their socio-economic background or age. I believe that digital education is crucial to unlock the potential of the European markets, potentially turning savers into investors, promoting innovation and contributing to strengthening Europe’s position as a global competitor in the digital market.
General framework for securitisation and specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0215/2020 - Paul Tang)
. – Strengthening the potential of banks to continue lending is vital for companies, especially SMEs to absorb the severe economic impact from the pandemic and to support the recovery. Securitisation can contribute to this as it enhances the functioning of financial markets, performing as a channel that helps to diversify funding sources and to allocate risks widely within the financial system in the Union. With that purpose, this Regulation will increase the potential of the EU regulatory framework on Securitisation by adopting new rules that will allow to better differentiate simple, transparent, and standardised products from complex, opaque and risky instruments. New provisions will require the compliance with transparency and disclosure standards, such as the provision of loan-level data. This will lower barriers to the securitisation process and subsequently improve liquidity and market depth, making securitisations more attractive, especially for non-bank investors. Therefore, I voted for this Regulation as it will improve efficiencies in the financial system by setting a more risk-sensitive prudential framework that will benefit both businesses and citizens through, for example, less expensive loans, credit cards or mortgages.
Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0213/2020 - Othmar Karas)
. ‒ Building on a high-quality securitisation framework represents a building block of the capital markets union. Securitisations support the economic recovery by enabling institutions and other market participants with further investment opportunities, thus promoting portfolio diversification, and contributing to the flow of financing to companies and individuals. However, the existing framework does not cater for synthetic on-balance sheet securitisation and is not fully suitable for the securitisation of non-performing exposures (NPE). By converting loans into tradable securities, securitisation can free up bank capital for additional lending and enable investors to finance the economic recovery. With that purpose, these amendments present targeted changes to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 that will contribute to improving efficiencies in the financial system, helping banks free up their balance sheet and to diversify their portfolios to extend further lending to the real economy. I voted in favour of this Regulation as it will allow a broader distribution of financial sector risks providing additional investment opportunities and promoting a liquid, deeper, safer, and robust market.
Procurement in the fields of defence and security and transfer of defence-related products: implementation of relevant Directives (A9-0025/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
. ‒ The Defence Procurement Directive and the Transfers Directive – the so-called ‘defence package’ – are aimed at opening up the internal market for defence products, to promote cross-border public procurement and to build up an EU-wide industrial base in the European defence and security sectors.However, the degree of application of these Directives remains uneven. Despite being a significant part of the defence supply chain, SMEs face many challenges in accessing defence and security procurement, particularly on a cross-border basis. This situation leads to a fragmentation of the European defence equipment market and hampers the levels of openness between EU countries. As a consequence, the industry suffers from a lack of the necessary economies of scale and runs the risk of missing out on fundamental know-how in key capability areas.To tackle this situation, this report outlines a series of recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the defence package and increase the level of transparency. I welcome this report as it calls for the implementation of measures that will contribute to facilitating cross-border market access for SMEs and improve the competitiveness of the sector’s technological and industrial base.
EU Strategy for Sustainable Tourism (A9-0033/2021 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
Tourism is one of the larger economic sectors in Europe, employing 22.6 million people. However, it has been one of the industries hardest hit by COVID-19. Therefore, planning for the future of the tourism industry is essential at the current time. With this report, the European Parliament is taking the lead in providing solutions for the industry’s recovery, also considering the opportunities brought by the Digital Strategy and the Green Deal. In efforts to restore safe travel, the Report urges EU countries to include the tourism and travel sectors in their recovery plans and calls on the creation of a common vaccination certificate and EU common criteria for travel. This will provide more transparent and stringent hygiene standards, will help travellers to make informed choices and enable the industry to adapt and comply with such standards. The Report also requests including direct financing to the industry, which is essential for it to recover from this pandemic and also to make the necessary investments for the long-term shift towards a digital and sustainable tourism sector. Therefore, I voted in favour of this report as it intends to advance the tourism sector recovery, promoting Europe as a leading digital, sustainable and safe destination for travellers.
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)
In parallel with supporting green and clean technologies, the European Union aims, through the implementation of the Just Transition Fund, to help regions and sectors most affected by the climate transition. Due to a reliance on fossil fuels or on highly polluting industrial processes, certain regions and industries need financial help and investments to achieve the climate goals. The fund will be financed through three different sources, namely the Just Transition fund itself, a scheme within InvestEU as well as a loan facility with the European Investment Bank (EIB) I voted in favour of the Just Transition Fund since it comprises significant investments in SMEs and start-ups to ensure economic diversification, in research and development to foster the transfer of new technologies, in the reskilling of workers for a better adaptation and in the stimulation of energy efficiency to finally reach a fair transition in all sectors and regions without distinction. Therefore, the Just Transition Fund will be an important element in the conversion of our economy into a more sustainable one.
Exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (Pericles IV programme): extension to the non-participating Member States (A9-0165/2021 - Clare Daly)
Money-counterfeiting has been threatening our economies for decades, and especially now that practices have evolved and become more sophisticated. In 2001, Pericles was introduced by the European Union to combat money counterfeiting in order to protect EU citizens and businesses and to restore trust in genuine euro notes and coins. This Union-wide exchange, assistance and training programme is intended for all EU27 countries, regardless of whether they have adopted the Euro or not. As shadow rapporteur for our group, I worked to ensure that the programme continued to offer the benefits of the training given through the Pericles IV programme. I voted in favour of the extension to the programme as combatting fraud and protecting our coins and banknotes helps safeguard the Union’s economy and secure the sustainability of public finances. Through the exchange of information and competences in seminars, the provision of technical and operational assistance to facilitate detection, and the purchase of equipment that detects counterfeiting practices, I believe that we can make significant steps towards the eradication of this threat.
Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (A9-0127/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology and a strategic engine of productivity and growth, with an exponential potential to increase common wellbeing on a global scale. Considered a major advance of the 21st century, it offers large opportunities as through the gathering of data, it enables machines to display human-like intelligence or to perform often repetitive tasks that would require human intelligence, with a certain degree of autonomy. I voted in favour of the report on AI in the areas of education, culture and media to ensure that AI is ethically used in these sectors, bringing benefits to education and culture policies and critical digital skills are taught to children from an early stage. While taking the risks of such technologies into consideration, the resolution stresses the need to develop digital skills at Union level, to train teachers so they can tailor their use to benefit children in order for them to be fit for the jobs of the future, around 40% of which do not exist yet. The report also highlights the potential of AI for cultural institutions in preserving, transmitting and promoting cultural heritage.
Creative Europe Programme (A9-0161/2021 - Massimiliano Smeriglio)
. – The promotion of culture, arts, cultural heritage and cultural diversity has played a central role in the European Union since its foundation. In order to perpetuate this legacy and to stay in line with the EU’s core values, the European Commission created the Creative Europe Programme within the New Agenda for Culture of 2018. The intrinsic value of culture and of artistic promotion is preserved by focusing on three main pillars: culture, media and cross-sectoral. I voted in favour of this programme since it promotes inclusion, collaboration and exchanges within the culture industry and among Member States. Indeed, it aims at strengthening transnational policy cooperation and collaboration in media capacities, at promoting the development and exportation of European works and at supporting free journalism and the associated media environments. This will help safeguard and perpetuate European cultural diversity and reinforce the competitiveness of the European artistic sectors, especially the audio-visual and media industry.
Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (RC-B9-0269/2021, B9-0269/2021, B9-0270/2021, B9-0271/2021, B9-0273/2021, B9-0274/2021, B9-0275/2021)
On 22 March 2021, due to the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong and the despicable treatment of the Uyghur populations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, the EU decided to sanction four Chinese individuals and companies for their role in the repression. China responded with a longer list of ten individuals, including four MEPs. I firmly denounce the sanctions applied by the Chinese Government and support the resolution on Chinese countersanctions that aims to condemn the unjustified sanctions against MEPs while urging a lifting of those sanctions by the Chinese authorities. In parallel, the resolution encourages Member States to impose targeted sanctions on individuals responsible for the crackdown on pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong and underlines that as long as the sanctions remain in place, any hope of ratifying the Chinese Comprehensive Agreement on Investment will be off the table. Furthermore, it highlights the EU’s values and promotion of a rules-based multilateral order as well as taking steps to reduce our dependency on China in the long term.
The adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom (B9-0272/2021)
The free flow of personal data is a prerequisite for a trade and investment partnership between the European Union and the United Kingdom. In order to demonstrate that the UK has an equivalent level of data protection to the EU, an adequacy decision is necessary. I did not support the Parliament’s resolution in this case, as the expiry of the existing bridging mechanisms without the introduction of a functional adequacy decision would significantly disrupt business activities in many economic sectors and create great uncertainty among Czech companies, for which the United Kingdom is an important trading partner. At the same time, it must be kept in mind that the data protection regime in the United Kingdom is in principle equivalent to that in the European Union and that the United Kingdom adopted the GDPR Regulation before leaving the European Union. I would hope that the UK will maintain equivalent data protection standards to the EU as we move forward.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
With the multiple lockdowns and travel restrictions it has brought, the COVID-19 pandemic has been a significant hurdle to the freedom of movement, a principle that lies at the core of the European Union since the 1985 Schengen Agreements. I support the Digital COVID Certificates in the EU as a way to re-connect citizens with their friends, family and also to travel on holiday. This Directive aims to mitigate the limits on freedom of movement brought about by the pandemic with a Digital COVID-19 Certificate that serves as a digital proof that a person has been fully vaccinated, recovered from COVID or produced a negative PCR test. This EU-wide tool will be issued automatically or upon request by Member States and will cover vaccines approved by EMA or by the relevant national authorities. I support the creation of this instrument as it encourages Member States to remove travel restrictions for EU citizens and respects the principle of universality. Aside from accelerating the recovery, particularly for the Transport and Tourism sector, the EU certificate ensures a high level of data protection. The certificates should be issued from the July 1st 2021 onwards.
Meeting the Global Covid-19 challenge: effects of waiver of the WTO TRIPS agreement on Covid-19 vaccines, treatment, equipment and increasing production and manufacturing capacity in developing countries (RC-B9-0306/2021, B9-0306/2021, B9-0307/2021, B9-0308/2021, B9-0309/2021, B9-0310/2021, B9-0311/2021)
This resolution considers Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and aims to make access to COVID-19 vaccines more widespread in the long term by suppressing property rights and to accelerate vaccination campaigns in countries that lag behind in the process. However, considering the limits of the waiver, I did not support the resolution. Indeed, a temporary TRIPS waiver would bring considerable economic damage to those producing the vaccines and affect worldwide innovation efforts in research for more efficient vaccines. Besides, court cases could delay the implementation of the waiver. Finally, the waiver may prove to be ineffective and show only that intellectual property rights are not the key barriers to the production or distribution of the vaccine.
The EU's Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade (B9-0305/2021)
The increase in the number of cyberattacks, especially on the healthcare systems of Ireland, France and Finland in the last few months, caused damage to patient care and more generally to the sensitive data of public and private European institutions. As a response to these latest developments, the EU aims to strengthen the European collective resilience against cyber threats and to create an environment that ensures trustworthy and reliable services and digital tools for citizens and businesses. I voted in favour of this proposal for a resolution as it emphasizes the need for Member States to provide active support to SMEs in cybersecurity issues, including funding and training to improve their responsiveness in anticipation of an attack. Furthermore, the resolution explicitly fosters joint EU cyber defence capabilities and encourages the development of a horizontal cybersecurity legislation to prevent ambiguity and fragmentation of the Single Market.
Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities (B9-0328/2021, B9-0330/2021, B9-0332/2021, B9-0339/2021, B9-0340/2021, B9-0344/2021)
I voted for the Parliament’s resolution on Belarus, which gained strong support by a vast majority. Recent events of forced landing of an intra-EU Ryanair flight in Minsk and detention of Belarusian journalist Raman Pratasevich and Sofia Sapega requires strong response. Pratasevich and Sapega must be released.This resolution condemns the systemic abuse of power by the regime of Alexander Lukashenko, rigged elections, around 500 tortured political prisoners and now jeopardising the safety of more than 170 EU citizens.It also calls for urgent adoption of targeted sanctions against the perpetrators of electoral fraud and violations of human rights, as well as the agents behind state propaganda and disinformation campaigns. It emphasizes targeted economic sanctions on the regime’s main industries.The EU has to do more to put international pressure on Lukashenko regime and to support the activities of civil society and the opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya pushing for a democratic transition in Belarus.
Cross-border payments in the Union (codification) (A9-0202/2021 - Karen Melchior)
In the establishment of a Single Market and of a Single Payment Area, it is central to ensure that the charges applying to cross-border payments are the same as for payments that occur within a Member State. This regulation responds to this need by laying down rules on cross-border payments and on the transparency of currency conversion charges within the Union. It emphasises facilitating the automation of payments, on creating a level-playing field in conversion charges among Member States and stresses the significance of cross-border cooperation in solving disputes and in enforcing the regulation. I voted in favour of this regulation as it aims to facilitate and harmonize cross-border digital, card and currency payments among Member States and to provide more transparency on conversion charges. This will contribute to stimulating cross-border economic activity in the European Union.
Public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism (A9-0195/2020 - Johan Van Overtveldt, Henrike Hahn)
While setting ambitious climate targets, the EU puts in place instruments to help all of Europe’s regions catch up. This facility is one of such instruments. The Public Sector Loan facility of the Just Transition Mechanism is part of the EU Green Deal and aims at incentivising greener public investments in regions most negatively affected by the EU’s transition towards climate neutrality, such as those that are heavily reliant upon fossil fuels. This facility is expected to mobilise between EUR 25 and 30 billion of public investments over the period 2021-2027 and will be financed with EU budget grants and loans from the European Investment Bank. I have voted in favour of this new facility as it supports a fair transition towards a more sustainable economy and promotes the development of renewable energies, upskilling and reskilling in regions that require assistance from the EU to be in line with the EU’s green targets.
Internal Security Fund (A9-0221/2021 - Monika Hohlmeier)
With the aim of developing a coordinated response to the intensified security threats in Europe, the Internal Security Fund (ISF) streams EU funding in the area of security by promoting the implementation of law enforcement cooperation. I voted in favour of the ISF as it supports the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in preventing and combatting crime by fostering cross border cooperation and joint operations. Stronger cooperation through the exchange of information among competent authorities will ensure a more efficient supervision.
Connecting Europe Facility (A9-0219/2021 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Dominique Riquet)
. ‒ The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), with a budget of EUR 42 billion, fosters investments in trans-European transport, energy and digital infrastructure projects that are crucial for the development of the energy union, the digital single market and sustainable transport modes. I voted in favour of this facility, and I am particularly pleased to see a digital component of EUR 3 billion to help the ongoing digitalisation of the transport and energy sectors as well as to reduce the digital divide among Member States. While fully integrating EU climate objectives into its programmes, the CEF supports decarbonisation efforts of Member States and encourages the development of cross-border cooperation on renewables.
Visa Information System (VIS): conditions for accessing other EU information systems for VIS (A9-0208/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
The Visa Information System (VIS) aims to facilitate the Schengen visa application procedure while preventing risks such as visa shopping, visa fraud, and more generally, illegal migration. The VIS reform mainly enlarges its scope to long-stay visas, enhances reporting mechanisms, increases the protection and resilience of the system, provides a more structured access to data for law enforcement authorities and improves fraud detection capabilities. I have voted in favour of the reform of the VIS, as better detection and investigation means will contribute to the protection of the Schengen area by offering improved control over migration flows. In addition, the provided measures of the reform ensure the resilience of the EU’s screening capacity to prevent future security incidents.
EU-NATO cooperation in the context of transatlantic relations (A9-0192/2021 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
Celebrating 70 years of the Transatlantic bond through NATO, the EU-NATO report aims to strengthen EU-NATO cooperation and identifies threats and challenges to the military association. I voted in favour of this report as it underlines the need for stronger coordination to combat threats to global peace and to deliver on EU defence ambitions. Moreover, I value the upgrade of the partnership to a strategic level as well as the initiative to improve current practices of intelligence-sharing among Member States and NATO allies in the context of the fight against terrorism.
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A9-0183/2021 - Tanja Fajon)
Since 2017, an annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area has been issued on a regular basis, examining different evaluation reports and Council conclusions and exchanging views with the Commission on specific issues. This year’s report focuses on the future of the Schengen area, on the use of large-scale information systems in home affairs and on the creation of a multiannual strategic policy cycle for European integrated border management. I voted in favour of the report as it aims to improve the Schengen area which is one of the main assets of the European Union, providing freedom of travel, and which considerably contributed to the improvement of cross-border infrastructure.
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)
The regulation on a reinforced role for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in crisis preparedness and management for medicinal products and medical devices aims at expanding the role of the EMA in the EU. It provides for a framework to monitor and prevent shortages of medicinal products, to prepare for the impact of major crises and to provide advice on medicinal products for human use. I voted in favour of this regulation as it targets a strengthened coordination among Member States in the area of health and as it enhances the responsiveness and resilience of the Union in the event of a pandemic. Increased preparedness and cooperation will help rapidly anticipate and overcome future threats.
Towards future-proof inland waterway transport in Europe (A9-0231/2021 - Caroline Nagtegaal)
Inland navigation is very important for many EU countries. It is a sector that is future-proof and contributes to an increased and more efficient freight and passenger transport, less road and urban congestion, a safer and more reliable mode of transport, creating jobs, enhancing growth and leading to a more sustainable transport system as a whole. Therefore I voted in favour of the report. Rivers connect Europe’s East and West via the Rhine and the Danube. European countries have very divergent fleets of inland vessels, which makes inland waterway transport convenient and useful for transporting different types and quantities of cargo to different destinations either on large or on small rivers. It is important to advance the completion of the TEN-T inland waterways core network and to look into possibilities for IWT in the comprehensive network. The future of a green and digitalised IWT system looks bright, but serious efforts and public and private investments are needed.
Brexit Adjustment Reserve (A9-0178/2021 - Pascal Arimont)
The EU and the UK are now two separate markets: two distinct regulatory and legal spaces, creating barriers to trade in goods and services and to cross-border mobility and exchanges, which will have broad and far-reaching consequences for businesses, citizens and public administrations. With Brexit, many aspects of business, work and life were disrupted or have become more complicated. I fully support the EU’s proposed EUR 5 billion Brexit Adjustment Reserve, which will mitigate the adverse consequences of Brexit on workers, companies (including SMEs) and administrations. In particular, Czechia will receive CZK 1.3 billion (EUR 50 million).
EU-Korea agreement: certain aspects of air services (A9-0251/2021 - Dominique Riquet)
I voted in favour of this agreement. It allows any EU airline to fly to the Republic of Korea from any of the twenty-two EU Member States which currently have a bilateral air services agreement with the Republic of Korea. In addition to the new routes’ opportunities for the EU carriers, the agreement is beneficial for both sides by bringing legal certainty to the commercial operations and ensuring non-discriminative approach to the airlines flying between the two respective territories. This air service agreement carries a triple benefit. It allows European passengers to access a wider range of services while bringing legal certainty for the whole aviation sector and its workers. Diplomatically, it also tightens the links with Korea, a country that is historically an ally of the EU.
A new EU-China strategy (A9-0252/2021 - Hilde Vautmans)
I supported this report. It stresses that the EU should continue talking to China about global challenges like climate change and health crises, while raising its concerns over systemic human rights violations. The report outlines six pillars on which the EU should build a new strategy to deal with China: cooperation on global challenges, engagement on international norms and human rights, identifying risks and vulnerabilities, building partnerships with like-minded partners, fostering strategic autonomy and defending European interests and values. China is a partner with whom we will continue to seek dialogue and cooperation, but a Union which positions itself as geopolitical cannot downplay China's assertive foreign policy and influence operations around the world, nor its contempt for human rights and commitment to bilateral and multilateral agreements.
Proposal on the setting-up of a delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Assembly, and defining its numerical strength (B9-0479/2021)
I voted in favour of the establishment of a new joint assembly between British and EU lawmakers to help exchange on post-Brexit issues to build mutually beneficial dialogue with our U.K. counterparts. I was nominated as a substitute member to the assembly representing our party. We will oversee the implementation of the Brexit trade deal I also aim to build dialogue with counterparts from across the Northern Ireland political spectrum to ensure that the Northern Ireland Protocol is as mutually beneficial as possible, recognizing the differing views within Northern Ireland and the accompanying sensitivities. It is determinative for both parties to form the implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Recommendations on next steps towards "Vision Zero" (A9-0211/2021 - Elena Kountoura)
Dle posledních známých statistik z roku 2019 zaznamenáváme 23 000 úmrtí při dopravních nehodách a 120 000 zranění. V porovnání s předchozími statistikami zaznamenáváme pouze malé zlepšení. Statistiky jsou znepokojující. Nesmíme zapomínat, že za každým číslem je člověk a ztracený život, proto jsem hlasoval ve prospěch tohoto doporučení, za intenzivnější a kooperativní úsilí o rozvoj v oblasti bezpečnosti silničního provozu. Podporuji výzkum a inovaci s cílem dosáhnout lepší osvěty a informační kampaně a v konečném důsledku zaměření a prosazení udržitelné a bezpečné mobility v Evropě.
The future of EU-US relations (A9-0250/2021 - Tonino Picula)
The EU and US are one of the world’s largest historical partners. I voted in favour of the report to advocate for better EU-US coordination. US’s engagement should provide an important opportunity to enhance EU-US relations, but also to renew the strategic partnership with countries of the Eastern Partnership and the Western Balkans. With US, as a partner, we should aim for better coordination and consultation on global issues to ensure transatlantic cohesion and focus on protecting human and minority rights. Our close cooperation on hybrid threats, misinformation as well as election interference remains positive.
State of EU cyber defence capabilities (A9-0234/2021 - Urmas Paet)
The increase in cyber insecurity have demonstrated that international agreements are necessary. We are facing new threats and cyber attacks in cyberspace on a daily basis that we need to avoid. I support the modernisation of responses against new threats and cyber defence capabilities as core elements. The EU and its Member States must further develop the cyber-security strategy, which sets realistic, precise and ambitious objectives and defines policies in a clear manner in both the military and the civilian domain.
The situation in Belarus after one year of protests and their violent repression (RC-B9-0482/2021, B9-0482/2021, B9-0483/2021, B9-0485/2021, B9-0488/2021, B9-0494/2021, B9-0496/2021)
More than one year ago, Belarus made a choice. Instead of free and fair elections and transition to democracy, the answer of the Lukashenko regime was a brutal crackdown on protests and repression. I regret that this forced the suspension of visa-free travel by the EU and Belarus, and I condemn recent incidents of smuggling irregular migrants across the EU’s border by the Lukashenko regime.We support the democratic opposition to the Belarusian regime, and we call to stop all the violent suppression of protests and for all political prisoners to be released. People have the right to free and fair elections. The Lukashenko regime is starting a hybrid war by helping Middle Eastern migrants to get to the EU border as retaliation for EU sanctions.
EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation (A9-0265/2021 - Charlie Weimers)
Taiwan is a key partner and democratic ally for the EU and a robust and technologically advanced economy. It shares with us the same democratic values, protection of fundamental rights, high social standards and fight against climate change. For the EU and it is a core interest to maintain peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific. I voted in favour to support the cooperation between EU and Taiwan as a like-minded partner to strengthen the initiatives in ICT, biotechnology, health and security. For both parties it is important to cooperate and to fight against disinformation from third countries.
Insurance of motor vehicles (A9-0035/2019 - Dita Charanzová)
This directive brings certainty around European motorsport that can continue to race without impossible insurance requirements. I voted in favour of the directive to improve the guarantee of high degree of safety on our roads while avoiding increased insurance premiums and other costs for citizens. By rapid and adequate payment of compensation, we manage to secure greater protection for the victims of an accident involving motor vehicles. The directive brings positive change – a common EU form for claims history. It will allow people to receive the same premium discounts as anyone else in another EU country where they sign a new insurance contract. The advantage of the directive is that if the insurance company goes bankrupt the citizens will be protected.
Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe (A9-0246/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
I supported the new EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation that establishes nine Joint Undertakings (JUs) under the EU’s main funding programme to increase coherence and to maximise impact in an evolving research and innovation landscape. The aim of the proposal is to provide a framework that aligns how Joint Undertakings operate which brings certainty across the borders. One of the priorities is to contribute to tackling global challenges, including the sustainable development goals. The report reinforces the scope and budget for clean aviation and for global health, reinforces the contribution to the reduction of the connectivity gap, with a focus on construction of the EU’s ecosystem for developing 5G and 6G technologies, applications and services. It also promotes SMEs inclusion.
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD (A8-0200/2019 - Peter Jahr)
The common agricultural policy is a long-discussed reform, which I supported. This reform should bring environmental benefits and better support for small- and medium-sized enterprises by providing an opportunity to invest in modern technologies, ecological production methods and strengthening their position in contrast to business chains. We want to help achieve a fair market margin. This agreement should also strengthen agriculture for potential future crisis and it is a step towards meeting the current challenges. I believe that the agreement will lead not only to sustainability but will also maintain the affordability of agricultural commodities for the population.
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs): key information documents. Extension of the transitional arrangement (A9-0297/2021 - Jonás Fernández)
I voted in favour of this quick fix to solve the issue regarding the issuing of key information documents (KIDs) by investment firms to retail clients. Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 provides for a transitional arrangement whereby management companies, investment companies and persons advising on, or selling, units of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and non-UCITS are temporarily exempted from the requirement to provide retail investors with a KID. This arrangement currently applies until 31 December 2021.This Regulation is accompanied by amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653. Given the time needed to implement these amendments and to reduce legal uncertainty, this Regulation extends the transitional arrangement to 31 December 2022, as opposed to the original date set in Delegated Regulation 2017/653 of 31 December 2021. The Commission had proposed 30 June 2022 in its original proposal for this Regulation.In order to be consistent, the amendments to the UCITS Directive change the date from which UCITS must prepare KIDs in accordance with the PRIIPs Regulation to 1 January 2023 as opposed to 1 July 2022.These are sensible changes, which give industry time to adapt to the new requirements, which is why I supported them.
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS): the use of key information documents (A9-0301/2021 - Jonás Fernández)
I voted in favour of this quick fix to solve the issue regarding the issuing of key information documents (KIDs) by investment firms to retail clients. Article 32 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 provides for a transitional arrangement whereby management companies, investment companies and persons advising on, or selling, units of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and non-UCITS are temporarily exempted from the requirement to provide retail investors with a KID. This arrangement currently applies until 31 December 2021.This Regulation is accompanied by amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653. Given the time needed to implement these amendments, and to reduce legal uncertainty, this Regulation extends the transitional arrangement to 31 December 2022, as opposed to the original date set in Delegated Regulation 2017/653 of 31 December 2021. The Commission had proposed 30 June 2022 in its original proposal for this Regulation.In order to be consistent, the amendments to the UCITS Directive change the date from which UCITS must prepare KIDs in accordance with the PRIIPs Regulation to 1 January 2023 as opposed to 1 July 2022.These are sensible changes, which give the industry time to adapt to the new requirements, which is why I supported them.
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference in Geneva, 30 November to 3 December 2021 (B9-0550/2021)
I supported the call for the Ministerial Conference to advance the WTO reform and to contribute to resolving 21st century challenges. MC12 can be an important moment where the reform process can start. It is important for WTO members to focus on core substantive results, whose success could accelerate global economic recovery.We have to bear in mind that, without substantial outcomes at MC12, some WTO members might look for alternative forums, which could jeopardise the future of the multilateral trading system. I hope the MC12 will also provide the ability that the WTO can help in the fight against Covid-19.
The safety of truck parking lots in the EU (B9-0552/2021)
. ‒ I supported this resolution based on the petition because safety for truck drivers is a key point for their safety in all ways. The European road network needs to meet safety standards. During the pandemic, we could remark how the truck logistic is important and we need to support it. Truck drivers are facing violent attacks, involving not only cargo thefts resulting in huge economic losses but also endangering their lives. Drivers of trucks need comfortable places for their rest and they need efficient capacity of parking slots. By providing safe parking lots we can support the drivers’ comfort zone and the attractiveness of the truck industry. By this reform, we also prevent road accidents, because drivers will be recovered better during their stopover.
European Year of Youth 2022 (A9-0322/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)
The COVID 19 pandemic has indisputably had an impact on all of us. However the young were significantly affected by moving their education online or giving up school and starting a professional life in a remote working environment, which was unusually isolated as well. The young have been the most affected category in terms of the economic and social impact of this situation. I supported the 2022 European Year of Youth to focus on re-establishing a positive outlook for European young people. Designating 2022 as a year focused on young people means increased efforts to include youth priorities in relevant EU policy areas and at every level of the EU’s key consultation processes, such as the Conference on the Future of Europe, and in other public policies at EU, national and local levels. There will be a special focus on young people with fewer opportunities and on dealing with mental health issues.
EU-US air transport agreement (A9-0335/2021 - Maria Grapini)
The EU and US are one of the world’s largest partners. I voted in favour of the protocol because air transport is important for EU-US cooperation. For cargo, the US is the largest extra-EU market, representing more than 20% of all goods transported to or from the EU by air. The US-EU Air Transport Agreement provides better market access for EU airlines including mechanisms to reach a normalisation of the aviation sector by liberalising foreign ownership. US carriers cannot set prices for routes within the EU. It gives EU airlines full access to sell tickets to contractors of the US Government and partial access to the air travel of US Government officials.
International procurement instrument (A9-0337/2021 - Daniel Caspary)
The International Procurement Instrument is an important tool in a complete toolbox that is needed to accompany a more assertive EU trade policy. The European procurement market is one of the most open in the world. However, accessing foreign procurement markets brings difficulties to companies and we need to encourage others in an effective way to open their procurement markets. I supported this agreement to have negotiations to open procurement markets in third countries. This tool should give the EU the possibility to take measures that affect the participation in tenders of companies from third countries if these companies cannot participate in those countries. The EU must ensure that European companies can have more opportunities.
Digital Markets Act (A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
. ‒ The purpose of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) is to ensure effective competition and especially a fair and contestable online platform environment in digital markets, which I fully support. Any high concentration of market power by one or a handful of companies is never good for competition. The big platforms quickly strengthen their positions while other companies struggle to compete, as there is no real level playing field. The DMA brings a solution to this problem by providing a clearer and more predictable framework for businesses, but also for enforcement by the relevant authorities. Digital services have brought important innovative benefits for users and contributed to the internal market by opening new business opportunities and facilitating cross-border trading. The DMA does not aim to target a couple of business groups with heavy restrictions. It sets out the rules needed for the respect of basic principles – such as competition or consumer protection rules.
Situation at the Ukrainian border and in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine (B9-0593/2021, B9-0594/2021, B9-0595/2021, B9-0596/2021, B9-0597/2021, B9-0598/2021)
The large-scale military build-up of Russian military forces along the borders with Ukraine in the last months of 2021 is worrying. The current Russian regime is threatening peace and security in Europe. To date, the conflict in Ukraine has claimed more than 14 000 lives. I voted in favour of this resolution to keep peace on the European continent and condemn Russia’s ongoing acts of aggression and hostility towards Ukraine, Eastern Partnership countries and the EU. The EU, as a strong player, must demonstrate that any further incursions into Ukrainian territory by the Russian Federation would come at a high price and such a move would lead to significantly expanded and severe EU sanctions.
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic taught us a lesson that revealed the shortcomings in the EU’s health threat management mechanism. I have voted in favour of this proposal to support higher level of protection, prevention, preparedness and response against all health threats in the EU and its purpose to upgrade the Union level structures and mechanism. A stronger mandate and new powers will give the agency competences and resources to be better prepared for future public health emergencies. Protecting the health of all Europeans is a key step to build a better Europe.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Determining cases where identity data may be considered as same or similar for the purpose of the multiple identity detection pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/817 (B9-0061/2022)
Námitka výboru LIBE ve věci způsobu, jakým bude vyhodnocována případná shoda dat evropskými agenturami, jako například eu-LISA, měla za úkol poukázat na problematický postup Evropské komise při navržení nových způsobů právě u vyhodnocování případných shod při posuzování kupříkladu žádostí o víza. Po bližším právním prozkoumání lze konstatovat, že Evropská komise nepochybila při navržení nových způsobů vyhodnocování případných shod dat, a proto jsem hlasoval proti těmto námitkám. Byly by spíše obstrukcí v době, kdy je potřebné vyhodnotit pravost identit především občanů třetích zemí vstupujících na území EU.
Digital Services Act (A9-0356/2021 - Christel Schaldemose)
Akt o digitálních službách aktualizuje a harmonizuje pravidla pro online služby, které každý den využívá většina Evropanů. Přijetí tohoto návrhu jsem podpořil, neboť jej považuji za posun k bezpečnějšímu, spravedlivějšímu a otevřenému internetu pro uživatele a online platformy. Celkový rámec nabízí spotřebitelům bezpečnější, zdravější online prostředí a informovanou volbu, zejména pokud jde o cílené reklamy. Je nutné zajistit, aby spotřebitelé mohli nakupovat bezpečné produkty na online trhu. Velmi vítám, že byly prosazeny záruky, které zajišťují, že oznámení budou zpracována nediskriminačním způsobem respektujícím základní práva, včetně svobody projevu, a přesto se zaměří na odstraňování nelegálního obsahu a zamezení šíření dezinformací.
Protection of animals during transport (Recommendation) (B9-0057/2022)
Dobré životní podmínky zvířat považuji za důležité téma, a proto jsem hlasoval ve prospěch přijetí tohoto návrhu. Každý rok jsou miliony živých zvířat přepravovány po silnici, železnici, moři a letecky v rámci EU i mimo ni na chov, výkrm nebo porážku. Šetření Parlamentu bohužel prokázalo, že dochází k porušování stávajících pravidel EU pro přepravu zvířat. Mezi podstatná porušení, kterým je potřeba zamezit, patří nedostatek volného prostoru, používání nevhodných vozidel, zásobování potravinami nebo tekutinami během přepravy či samotná délka přepravy. Tyto aspekty mají být legislativně lépe zohledněny a podmínky zpřísněny, jako např. regulace teploty, pohodlí při přepravě, dostatek místa, omezení délky přepravy, věk zvířete a další, které zajišťují etičtější zacházení se zvířaty.
Rail: prolongation of temporary levying of charges - COVID-19 (C9-0001/2022)
The COVID-19 pandemic has had serious consequences for railway undertakings, with a sharp drop in traffic. The resolution voted in the European Parliament aims to support these companies and counter the negative economic effects of this pandemic. It is therefore a question of extending the period allowing flexibility in the payment of railway infrastructure charges. My vote in favour of this resolution is in line with the importance of supporting our companies and the railway sector.
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine(C9-0028/2022)
The European Commission has proposed a macro-financial assistance to Ukraine in the amount of €1.2 billion. I fully support that. It is in line with the European Union’s ambition to support Ukraine and its citizens in their difficult situation of tensions and challenges. The EU wants to address the financing needs and strengthen the economic stability and resilience of the country.
Implementation of the Toy Safety Directive (A9-0349/2021 - Brando Benifei)
I voted for the resolution taking stock of the implementation of this directive. It aims at ensuring the safety of children and providing a level playing field for businesses through compliance with EU rules in the market. This directive also highlights the positive role of e-commerce. Its increasing development poses many challenges and calls for coordination to ensure product compliance and traceability of toys sold online. It is then a question of bringing full coherence between the rules of the European market and the rights of our consumers.
Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer (A9-0001/2022 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
My full support for cancer prevention and awareness commits to the establishment of preventive policies and coordinated actions to fight cancer in the European Union. This resolution supports further scientific research on these issues. It is also a way of highlighting the significant inequalities in access to health care for European citizens. Finally, it is through the coordination and sharing of scientific knowledge that the fight against cancer can evolve and improve the lives of European citizens in the long term.
Tackling non-tariff and non-tax barriers in the single market (A9-0336/2021 - Kosma Złotowski)
This resolution embodies many of the key concepts and challenges we face today. The freedom of movement for citizens, the entire single market and the business environment have all been deeply affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. This resolution underlines the importance of all these challenges. It also calls for the EU to play a stronger role in the ongoing digital transformation, underlining its benefits for both consumers and businesses. That is why I voted in favour of it.
Empowering European youth: post-pandemic employment and social recovery (B9-0091/2022)
. ‒ The debate around youth is more than essential and our support is our role as a Member of the European Parliament. I voted in favour of this text. I believe that we need to support and accompany young people in their professional career and in their general development, from their mental health to their political and democratic participation in the European Union. The youth are instrumental also in terms of digital transformation. This year, 2022, is symbolically dedicated to the youth and we should give it our full support as the youth are the future of Europe.
Cohesion policy: promoting innovative and smart transformation and regional ICT connectivity (A9-0010/2022 - Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro)
The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the digital divide within the Union and the need for administrative transparency and accessibility. I voted for this resolution, as it aims to reinforce the ICT connectivity of administration in order to benefit our citizens and create economic balance. Additionally, the resolution paves the way towards supporting the digital transition of our businesses, in particular SMEs. Finally, better training and support in digital learning, as included in the resolution, will enhance European citizens and entrepreneurship throughout Europe.
Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the EU (A9-0022/2022 - Sandra Kalniete)
. ‒ With the ongoing war in Ukraine, it is more urgent than ever to analyse our media and information channels and to understand the influence of foreign actors on public opinion. I supported the report of the Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union, including Disinformation (INGE), which allows us to analyse the EU’s news platforms, foreign interference on the European media sphere and its impact on our democratic processes. This report raises awareness of potential loopholes in legislation allowing for disinformation. We need to draw lessons learnt and strengthen our security and the freedom of our media.
A new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 (A9-0023/2022 - Marianne Vind)
European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2022 on a new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 (including better protection of workers from exposure to harmful substances, stress at work and repetitive motion injuries)The COVID 19 pandemic has spread in particular through places of work and social activities. This has revealed shortcomings in terms of health and safety at the workplace.I supported this resolution calling for better consideration of health and safety risks at work. Many risks are still present and we must be better prepared to prevent potential future health crises. With this resolution, the European Parliament calls for improved communication on occupational health, protection and promotion of preparedness plans.
Refugees in Europe: CARE (C9-0057/2022)
Naléhavost situace a výzvy, kterým dnes čelíme, nás nutí zavázat se k ochraně členských států a podpoře řešení masivního přílivu lidí prchajících před válkou na Ukrajině. Na tomto posledním plenárním zasedání jsem hlasoval pro tuto akci soudržnosti na pomoc běžencům v Evropě (CARE). Dnešní výjimečná situace vyžaduje podporu členských států prostřednictvím řady investic do mnoha oblastí, jako je zdravotnictví, zaměstnanost, bydlení, děti a vzdělávání.
Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (A9-0043/2022 - Markéta Gregorová)
Dne 24. března jsem podpořil rozhodnutí o usnesení o makrofinanční pomoci Moldavské republice. Touto pomocí se posílí vztahy mezi EU a Moldavskou republikou. Unie dává k dispozici částku 150 milionů EUR na podporu programu hospodářské stabilizace a zásadních reforem, které Moldavsko potřebuje. Moldavská republika byla významně zasažena pandemií COVID 19, energetickou krizí a velkým přílivem uprchlíků z Ukrajiny. V kontextu současné ruské hrozby vyvolat válečné konflikty nejen na Ukrajině je důležité upevnit naše vztahy s Moldavskou republikou.
Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (RC-B9-0160/2022, B9-0160/2022, B9-0162/2022, B9-0163/2022, B9-0164/2022, B9-0165/2022, B9-0166/2022, B9-0167/2022)
Poslední plenární zasedání v Bruselu bylo důležitým momentem v souvislosti s potřebou přijetí mimořádného akčního plánu EU pro naši potravinovou bezpečnost po ruské invazi na Ukrajinu. Ukrajina je významným dodavatelem některých surovin do EU a situace, ve které se nacházíme, vyžaduje, abychom přehodnotili naši potravinovou strategii. Hlasoval jsem pro rezoluci, která žádá Evropskou komisi o rychlé řešení a zajištění bezpečnosti potravin v EU. Je třeba vyvinout evropské a celosvětové úsilí, aby se zabránilo nedostatku potravin a možným sociálním nepokojům. Musíme také vytvořit potravinové koridory jak na Ukrajinu, tak z ní. Nesmíme dovolit, aby se přístup k potravinám stal geopolitickou zbraní.
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road (A9-0041/2022 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
I supported this resolution on 5 April 2022 to clarify the rules and harmonise the legal framework of the goods vehicle hire market. This resolution addresses four points necessary for this harmonisation. It calls for greater flexibility for transport companies to hire and lease goods vehicles, a gradual opening of the market, the introduction of safeguards, and, finally, improved enforcement, particularly regarding the registration of the registration numbers of hired vehicles. Harmonisation is essential to improve the market and the use of leased vehicles.
Implementation of the 2021-2027 cohesion policy (B9-0173/2022)
The resolution voted on 6 April stresses the need to work for the Union’s cohesion policy funds for the period 2021—2027 and to ensure the economic recovery and resilience of European regions. My vote in favour supports this desire to speed up the adoption of agreements as well as the consideration of cohesion policy and the joint RIF as a budgetary and operational tandem with the Member States. Finally, this resolution stresses the imperative of implementing the new programmes as soon as they are adopted, to strengthen the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union.
Increased pre-financing from REACT-EU (C9-0127/2022)
. ‒ The war in Ukraine is a turning point for the European Union in managing public budgets. In addition to the Covid-19 pandemic, this new challenge calls for rapid relief of public budgets to preserve the capacity of Member States to support the recovery of economies and to allow additional payments to operational programs. I voted in favour of this resolution to support the economies of our Union and the economic recovery process.
Gas storage (C9-0126/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi) (vote)
. ‒ The geopolitical context underlines the need to review the European Union’s independence from third countries, particularly on the issue of primary energy. I voted in favour of this proposal to support the need to address the threats to our security of gas supply within the European Union. In a spirit of solidarity, we call for the use of the Union’s storage capacities to ensure the security of supply for the following winter periods.
The Schengen evaluation mechanism (A9-0054/2022 - Sara Skyttedal)
. ‒ The European Parliament has adopted the European Commission’s proposal on the establishment and operation of an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis. My vote in support of this proposal underlines the importance of maintaining a level of trust between the Member States in the respect of fundamental rights and non-controls at internal borders. This evaluation mechanism will make it possible, among other things, to identify the proper functioning of the Schengen area, monitor deficiencies, and, above all, provide a dialogue between the Member States on the proper functioning of the Schengen area. The European Parliament is also demanding closer involvement in this mechanism.
Right to repair (B9-0175/2022)
I supported the resolution on the right to repair. With this adoption, the Parliament supports a will to guarantee the right to repair as a pillar of the circular economy. The resolution focuses on three main points: designing products that last longer and can be repaired, empowering consumers to choose repairable products, and strengthening consumer rights and guarantees for longer use of goods. These three pillars support Europe in developing its circular economy as well as in creating new jobs for SMEs, micro-enterprises, and the self-employed.
Artificial intelligence in a digital age (A9-0088/2022 - Axel Voss)
. ‒ I supported the resolution on artificial intelligence (AI) in a digital age as it focuses on a number of my priorities: it aims to shape and regulate human-centric artificial intelligence, which will serve our people while respecting their privacy.First, the resolution seeks to boost the EU’s role in the global competition for tech leadership by establishing a future-oriented, horizontal, and innovation-friendly regulatory framework for AI development. To achieve this, I favour a clear regulatory framework in which start-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) could thrive. Furthermore, I agree with the highlighted central role of SMEs and start-ups in introducing AI technologies within the EU and promoting joint investment, research, and development to support them further.
Competition policy – annual report 2021 (A9-0064/2022 - Andreas Schwab)
Competition is the heartbeat of the European single market and competition. Therefore, I voted in support of the annual report 2021 on competition policy because it focuses on two groups bound to face difficulties caused by COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine in the incoming months. These are citizens with low and middle incomes and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).In support of the former, specific measures need to be taken progressively and proportionately in order to offset the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, these measures should fully comply with the EU competition rules. In addition, increased product market competition is likely to reduce profit margins and price levels, which may have a knock-on effect on sector-specific inflation.To help SMEs, I favour the creation of a post-COVID-19 roadmap to consider SMEs from rural and less-developed areas, which need to be provided with access to wider markets. Moreover, I regret that despite being a backbone of the European economy and their growth opportunities, SMEs still face difficulties in obtaining access to finance.
State of play of the EU-Moldova cooperation (RC-B9-0240/2022, B9-0240/2022, B9-0241/2022, B9-0242/2022, B9-0243/2022, B9-0244/2022, B9-0245/2022)
I voted in favour of strengthening EU—Moldova cooperation, especially since the Republic of Moldova has been disproportionally affected by the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine. Its citizens have shown great solidarity toward the refugees from Ukraine. The European Council should give a clear signal in June 2022 regarding the Republic of Moldova’s application for EU membership, submitted on 3 March 2022.The Republic of Moldova is now facing an asymmetric impact of the war in Ukraine and the imposed sanctions. Therefore, in addition to its current financial support to mitigate the impact of rising energy prices on the most vulnerable people, the EU should support the Republic of Moldova in ensuring its energy independence and accelerating the development of renewable energy sources.Stability in Moldova is vital for the safety and stability of the EU’s eastern border in the context of the humanitarian crisis caused by the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine.
Impact of Russian illegal war of aggression against Ukraine on the EU transport and tourism sectors (B9-0223/2022)
Dne 5. května jsem podpořil rezoluci o dopadu ruské války na Ukrajině na odvětví dopravy a cestovního ruchu v EU. Doprava je pro EU strategickým prostředkem solidarity a podpory Ukrajiny, pokud jde o logistiku, humanitární pomoc, evakuaci a mobilitu uprchlíků. I proto oceňuji operativní pokyny přijaté Evropskou komisí k zajištění průjezdu osob z Ukrajiny bez platných dokladů na palubách dopravců ze zemí EU.Na druhou stranu vítám řadu sankčních opatření vůči Rusku, jakými jsou například nedávné sankce, které zakazují podnikům v silniční dopravě se sídlem v Rusku a Bělorusku přepravovat zboží po silnicích na území Evropské unie. Tyto kroky drasticky omezí možnosti ruského průmyslu získávat klíčové zboží. Turistický sektor čelí po dvou letech pandemie dalším příkořím v podobě zvýšených cen pohonných hmot a jejich dopadu na konečné ceny zboží a služeb. I proto vyzývám ke společné evropské politice cestovního ruchu, a zejména k akčnímu plánu s účinnou finanční podporou, který by pomohl tomuto odvětví a destinacím, jež byly nejvíce zasaženy.
Temporary trade liberalisation supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under EU/Ukraine Association Agreement (A9-0146/2022 - Sandra Kalniete)
. ‒ Russia’s illegal, unprovoked and unjustified military aggression has profound negative consequences for Ukraine’s trade. Therefore, I voted in favour of the resolution to grant Ukraine temporary trade liberalisation, thereby supplementing trade concessions to certain Ukrainian products.Firstly, this resolution helps Ukraine maintain its global trade position as much as possible. This will help Ukraine minimise the damage to its economy during the war and accelerate its recovery when the situation in the country becomes more stable. Secondly, while the loss of customs revenue and anti-dumping duties on the EU’s budget will be minimal, this measure will facilitate overland logistics and increase the degree of market liberalisation, circumstances permitting. Moreover, it will provide flexibility and certainty for Ukrainian producers. Thirdly, the resolution is also in line with the Association Agreement, aiming for Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU’s internal market. Thus, it further deepens Ukraine’s trade relations with the European Union.
Preservation, analysis and storage at Eurojust of evidence relating to genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and related criminal offence (C9-0155/2022)
. ‒ The extent of evidence of war crimes committed during Russia’s aggression against Ukraine renders the current legal and technical framework of the European Agency for Judicial Cooperation (Eurojust) insufficient. Therefore, I supported the resolution to strengthen Eurojust’s tasks and powers to fulfil its role in supporting and strengthening cooperation between European Union Member States in the investigation of alleged war crimes.My vote corresponds with my strong condemnation of the illegal, unprovoked, and unjustified Russian aggression in Ukraine. The resolution will enable Eurojust to permanently, immediately and appropriately store, preserve and share evidence of war crimes and cooperate with the International Criminal Court. Furthermore, Eurojust will play a key role in coordinating the work of national prosecutors and the International Criminal Court and identifying evidence of such crimes. Therefore, it will be equipped to play a key role in international investigations of the alleged war crimes in Ukraine.
EU Association Agreement with the Republic of Moldova (A9-0143/2022 - Dragoş Tudorache)
The Republic of Moldova is of geopolitical importance in the close neighbourhood of the EU. Yet Russia’s actions in Ukraine and the subsequent consequences in the Transnistria region are weakening the country’s security and stability. Therefore, I supported the annual implementation report on the EU association agreement with the Republic of Moldova as a clear signal for the country’s future in working towards an ever-closer relationship with the EU, and bearing in mind Moldova’s application to join the EU.We need to condemn Russia’s weaponisation of its gas exports to put political pressure on the Republic of Moldova and recent provocative incidents in the contested Transnistria region of Moldova. The Republic of Moldova belongs to Europe. Thus, the European Union should aid its aspiration to become a member state.Furthermore, the report serves as support in bringing the Moldova closer to becoming a member of the Union. It clearly states that the country needs to conduct reforms in justice and anti-corruption, the banking sector, energy security and diversification, and economic convergence, administrative reform. The report outlines constructive ways to assist the country with gradual forms of sectoral integration. As such, it is a blueprint for strengthening and streamlining EU-Moldova relations.
Prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus (B9-0269/2022, RC-B9-0270/2022, B9-0270/2022, B9-0274/2022, B9-0275/2022, B9-0276/2022, B9-0277/2022)
I support the strong condemnation of the prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus. They need to be released immediately, securing full respect for international conventions protecting human rights and fundamental rights. Our support for them is essential since they have been at the forefront of the fight for democracy in Belarus and vocal opposition to the war in Ukraine.Freedom of speech is essential for any democratic society and it is essential to protect the rights of Belarusian citizens that suffer under the Lukashenka regime. It is high time that Belarusian authorities immediately and unconditionally release and drop all charges against political prisoners, members of civil society, journalists and anyone arbitrarily detained in the lead-up to, during or since the disputed 2020 presidential election.Lastly, I deplore the adoption of the amendment to the Criminal Code introducing the death penalty for ‘attempted acts of terrorism’ and call for the abolition of the death penalty in Belarus.
The fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine (B9-0272/2022, RC-B9-0281/2022, B9-0281/2022, B9-0282/2022, B9-0283/2022, B9-0284/2022, B9-0285/2022)
I voted for the resolution to fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine it rightly conveys strong condemnation of Russia’s illegal, unprovoked, and unjustified aggression in Ukraine.I fully support the investigation launched by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court into alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of genocide committed in Ukraine, the work of the Commission of Inquiry of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the efforts of independent civil society organisations working to collect and preserve evidence of war crimes.The European Union and its Member States should provide all necessary assistance to bolster Ukraine’s judicial capacity and resources to investigate and try war crimes effectively.We must fight for justice for these victims of war crimes. We must work with international institutions, national authorities, and civic platforms to secure evidence and prepare the framework for ensuring accountability.
Social and economic consequences for the EU of the Russian war in Ukraine – reinforcing the EU’s capacity to act (RC-B9-0267/2022, B9-0267/2022, B9-0271/2022, B9-0273/2022, B9-0278/2022, B9-0279/2022, B9-0280/2022)
I voted in favour of the resolution on social and economic consequences for the EU of the Russian war in Ukraine. It recognizes that the EU’s justified sanctions against Russia and Belarus affect the post-pandemic economic recovery of the EU and outlines means to help EU citizens and businesses face the current crisis.The resolution helps EU citizens and businesses deal with the economic and social implications of this war and the imposed sanctions. For the former, it suggests that the EU must take urgent measures to enhance food security for its citizens and at the global level and highlights the increase in costs of fuel and fertilisers.For the latter, it asks to create an Economic relief package for businesses, including economic, budgetary, and legislative measures. In addition, this package will upgrade and ensure major investment in the EU’s energy infrastructure and boost investment in European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange)
I voted in favour of the Social Climate Fund, which aims to help those most exposed to energy poverty.To achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, investments in alternative energy sources, better insulation and clean transport will be necessary. To support vulnerable households during this transition, an estimated budget of EUR 16.4 billion until 2027, potentially reaching EUR 72 billion by 2032, can help tackle energy and mobility poverty.The Social Climate Fund brings concrete short and long-term measures to households unable to access essential energy services and those with high transport costs or limited access to affordable modes of transport. It reduces energy taxes and fees or provides other direct income support to address the rising prices of road transport and heating fuel. It also incentivises building renovation, switching to renewable energy sources in buildings, and shifting from private to public transportation, car-sharing or cycling. Lastly, it supports the development of a second-hand market for electric vehicles.
Exceptional temporary support under EAFRD in response to the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (C9-0185/2022)
I voted for the exceptional measures to support farmers and rural businesses in the EU, which have been affected by the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. They are now facing significant increases in input prices for energy, fertilisers, and animal feed. Moreover, the processing industry has been particularly affected by increased gas and electricity costs.Farmers and small to medium businesses (SMEs) whose applications are successful will receive a lump sum payment to ensure continuity of their business activity and support their processing, marketing, or development of agricultural products. The exceptional measures are vital to safeguard food security and reinforce the resilience of food systems in the EU, contribute to global food security, and address the market disturbance caused by increased input costs.
Gas storage (C9-0126/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
I voted in favour of measures to safeguard the security of the gas supply to protect Europeans from possible supply shocks. The regulation is the answer to the current situation when we aim to refill Europe’s strategic gas reserves more quickly before winter to ensure energy supplies are secure, considering Russia’s war against Ukraine.First, the regulation sets a minimum gas level in storage facilities at 80% by 1 November 2022. This improves the EU’s emergency preparedness and resilience to gas supply disruptions. Second, the regulation improves security by declaring gas storage facilities as critical infrastructure and mandatory certification of storage operators to avoid risks of outside interference. This will avoid potential risks resulting from third-country influence over the critical storage infrastructure.Lastly, the regulation improves the purchasing power of the EU’s Member States as the European Commission will issue guidance on how EU countries can jointly procure gas to be activated voluntarily by two or more member states.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (A9-0138/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I endorsed the agreement to extend the legal framework of the EU Digital COVID Certificate for another 12 months. The COVID-19 pandemic is unfortunately not over yet, and we must prepare ourselves for potential new variants and other pandemic-related threats. The extension of the EU Digital COVID Certificate serves to prevent restrictions to EU free movement. Member States will only be allowed to do so where such restrictions are necessary, proportionate, and non-discriminatory to safeguard public health. The current rules, allowing free movement of the Certificate’s holders, will be valid until 30 June 2023. However, should the epidemiological situation allow for it, the European Commission may propose to repeal it after six months if no longer necessary.
Draft amending budget No 3/2022: financing reception costs of people fleeing Ukraine (A9-0181/2022 - Karlo Ressler)
I was in favour of the financial support to ensure that people fleeing Ukraine benefit from adequate first reception in one of the Union’s Member States. This financial support is significant to the Czech Republic as it welcomed almost 380 000 Ukrainian refugees. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced many Ukrainians to flee their country, resulting in a mass influx of displaced persons to the EU Member States. These are dealing with urgent migration and border management challenges and facing the entailed costs. The European Parliament recognises that some Member States, including the Czech Republic, are disproportionately affected. Therefore, the EU budget will contribute to financing the first reception and registration costs of people fleeing Ukraine for a total amount of EUR 400 million.
Digital Services Act (A9-0356/2021 - Christel Schaldemose)
I supported the adoption of the Digital Services Act following the agreement reached between the Parliament and Council. The DSA sets out the first set of European rules for the online platforms that citizens use in their daily lives. It sets out new standards for the accountability of online platforms as regards harmful practices and illegal content. It will also set a high standard for the protection of the rights of users. Furthermore, the new rules should serve to encourage small and medium operators to scale up in Europe. For all operators with the exception of the largest ones, the DSA will apply from 2024. For the largest operators, it will apply from 4 months after they are designated as a very large online platform.
Digital Markets Act (A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
I voted in favour of the interinstitutional agreement on the Digital Markets Act. This is a significant piece of legislation for the future of the tech sector in Europe. The concentration of market power is not a positive thing for competition in the markets, and the DMA will serve to bring some solutions to this problem. It will prevent the so-called gatekeepers from abusing their power and allow their competitors to innovate and grow. This is particularly good news for European SMEs. Thanks to the DMA they should have the same opportunities and the same access to the market as the big players. This in turn will help our SMEs to access the digital market. As our markets become ever more intertwined with digitalisation and the tech sector, it’s important to update the EU’s rulebook to deal with the various different effects this will have on European businesses and consumers.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Temporary measures concerning driver documents issued by Ukraine (C9-0201/2022)
Podpořil jsem tento návrh nařízení, jehož cílem je umožnit ukrajinským občanům, kteří v současnosti pobývají v členských státech v režimu dočasné ochrany, aby nadále používali svůj ukrajinský řidičský průkaz, aniž by jej museli vyměnit za řidičský průkaz EU nebo skládat novou řidičskou zkoušku. Platnost řidičských průkazů ukrajinských státních příslušníků ve většině členských států EU je 6 měsíců a Rusko napadlo Ukrajinu dne 24. února 2022, mnohým uprchlíkům by tedy vypršel konec oprávnění začátkem srpna. Díky tomuto nařízení bude platnost řidičských oprávnění prodloužena a předejde se další administrativní zátěži, která je komplikací nejen pro členské státy, ale Ukrajince samotné.Nařízení navíc umožní ukrajinským řidičům nákladních vozidel a autobusů pod dočasnou ochranou v EU po krátkém školení a testu prodloužit platnost jejich osvědčení o odborné způsobilosti vydaných na Ukrajině. To by jim mělo umožnit pracovat v EU během období dočasné ochrany.
Exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (C9-0221/2022)
I supported the package of €1 billion macro-financial assistance to Ukraine. This financial assistance complements other EU support to Ukraine in the humanitarian, development, customs and defence fields. The macro-financial assistance aims to address the immediate and most urgent funding needs of Ukraine, and to ensure the Ukrainian state can continue to perform its most critical functions. Providing assistance to Ukraine is essential not only for functioning of the state and subsequent reconstruction but also for resistance against Russian invasion.
Uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road (codification) (A9-0228/2022 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Podpořil jsem kodifikované znění návrhu této směrnice, jelikož se jím sjednotí postupy kontroly prováděné členskými státy při silniční přepravě nebezpečných věcí ve vozidlech, která se pohybují na území členských států nebo na ně vjíždějí ze třetí země. Jedná se o namátkové kontroly, které budou zahrnovat rozsáhlou část silniční sítě. Členské státy budou v rámci uplatňování této směrnice spolupracovat a každý z nich bude každoročně Komisi zasílat zprávu o uplatňování této směrnice, ve které bude např. počet zjištěných protiprávních jednání či počet provedených kontrol.
Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation in the area of resolution (“daisy chain” proposal) (A9-0020/2022 - Jonás Fernández)
Návrh nařízení „daisy chain“ je součástí jednotného souboru pravidel týkajících se bankovní unie a má rozšířit možnosti řešení krize bankovních institucí, například pokud jde o absorpci ztrát či rekapitalizaci. V rámci hlasování týkajícího se „daisy chain“ jsem podpořil pozměňovací návrh na prodloužení lhůty pro vstup nového režimu odpočtů v platnost do roku 2024, a to z toho důvodu, aby finanční instituce měly dostatek času na zavedení speciálního přístupu k nepřímému upisování zdrojů způsobilých pro interní minimální požadavek na kapitál a způsobilé závazky, a to včetně nového režimu odpočtů.
The impact of COVID-19 closures of educational, cultural, youth and sports activities on children and young people in the EU (A9-0216/2022 - Hannes Heide)
Děti a mládež se během pandemie nemohly účastnit vzdělávacích, kulturních, mládežnických a sportovních aktivit osobně a jejich sociální interakce s vrstevníky tak byla výrazně omezena, což se negativně podepsalo na jejich duševním zdraví a pohodě. Nucený přechod na virtuální výuku navíc znevýhodnil děti a mládež ze sociálně slabšího prostředí. Hlasoval jsem pro výše uvedené usnesení, jelikož zahrnuje konkrétní návrhy a doporučení toho, jak zmírnit dlouhodobé negativní dopady uzavření uvedených aktivit během pandemie na budoucí životní podmínky dětí a mladých lidí. Usnesení má za cíl řešit např. otázku stigmatu kolem duševního zdraví dětí a mládeže (např. formou cílených kampaní), zejména pokud jde o marginalizované skupiny, které jsou vystaveny vyššímu riziku vzniku poruch duševního zdraví, či otázku nerovnosti v přístupu k technologiím a digitálním nástrojům a také k výše zmiňovaným aktivitám (např. formou podpory různých typů projektů či vzdělávacích platforem).
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (A9-0253/2021 - Joanna Kopcińska)
Hlasoval jsem pro aktualizaci a posílení statutu Evropského střediska pro prevenci a kontrolu nemocí, jež se zabývá dohledem, připraveností, včasným varováním a reakcí v rámci posíleného rámce EU pro zdravotní bezpečnost. Při propuknutí pandemie COVID-19 a během jejího zvládání byly odhaleny nedostatky v mechanismu EU pro zvládání zdravotních hrozeb. Tento návrh jsem se tak rozhodl podpořit, jelikož se jím zajistí, že EU jako celek i jednotlivé členské státy budou lépe vybaveny pro prevenci, monitorování, reakci a boj s budoucími krizemi v oblasti zdraví.
Serious cross-border threats to health (A9-0247/2021 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
Dalším způsobem, jak zajistit, abychom byli v budoucnu lépe připraveni na zdravotní hrozby a krize, ať už jde o infekční nemoci, či hrozby environmentálního, potravinového nebo chemického charakteru, bylo posílit plánování připravenosti, sdílení informací a hodnocení na úrovni EU prostřednictvím plánů EU a plánů jednotlivých členských států. V rámci tohoto návrhu, který jsem také podpořil, Komise a Evropské středisko pro prevenci a kontrolu nemocí zmíněné národní plány členských států vyhodnotí a členské státy musí přijmout opatření k odstranění případných zjištěných nedostatků. Díky tomuto návrhu bude také zajištěna efektivnější spolupráce, pokud jde o připravenost na krize a jejich řešení na přeshraničních územích.
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (A9-0129/2022 - Alex Agius Saliba)
Rozhodl jsem se podpořit nařízení týkající se jednotné nabíječky v EU, protože je šetrné k životnímu prostředí, ušetří peníze spotřebitelům (až 250 milionů EUR ročně za zbytečné nákupy nabíječek) v celé EU a zároveň zabrání vzniku 1 000 tun zbytečného odpadu ročně. Mobilní telefony, tablety, elektronické čtečky, sluchátka, digitální fotoaparáty, sluchátka a headsety, kapesní herní konzole a přenosné reproduktory, které se dobíjejí pomocí kabelu, budou muset být vybaveny portem USB typu C bez ohledu na jejich výrobce. Do 40 měsíců od vstupu v platnost uvedeného nařízení budou muset být požadavkům přizpůsobeny také notebooky. Při koupi nových elektronických zařízení budou kupujícím poskytnuty jasné informace o nabíjecích vlastnostech těchto zařízení a kupující si tak budou moci vybrat, zda chtějí nové elektronické zařízení s nabíjecím zařízením, nebo bez něj. Opakované používání nabíječek tak bude častější.
The EU’s response to the increase in energy prices in Europe (RC-B9-0416/2022, B9-0416/2022, B9-0417/2022, B9-0418/2022, B9-0419/2022, B9-0420/2022, B9-0421/2022, B9-0422/2022)
Návrh usnesení týkající se reakce EU na růst cen energií v Evropě jsem podpořil, jelikož je nanejvýš důležité vytvořit evropský energetický štít, který bude chránit znevýhodněné domácnosti i malé a střední podniky. Opatření zasahující do trhu s energiemi jsou cílená a pouze dočasná, aby se předešlo jeho destabilizaci. Investice do energetické účinnosti a obnovitelných zdrojů a zaměření na úspory energie jsou tak logickými kroky nejen v rámci zachování cílů Zelené dohody. Usnesení také vyzdvihuje nutnost investovat do bezpečnosti energetické infrastruktury a podporovat otevřenou strategickou autonomii. Plně souhlasím také s tím, že by měl být zajištěn cenově dostupný přístup k základním službám zejména pro znevýhodněné malé a střední podniky a samozřejmě pro domácnosti.
The accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the Schengen area (B9-0462/2022, B9-0463/2022)
Prohlášení vyzývající k přijetí Rumunska a Bulharska do schengenského prostoru jsem podpořil. Jsem přesvědčen, že každý občan Evropské unie by měl mít možnost výhod schengenského prostoru využít. V případě občanů Bulharska a Rumunska toto však neplatí, jelikož stále nejsou členy Schengenského prostoru, a to navzdory faktu, že obě země vstoupily do EU již v roce 2007 a dlouhodobě plní stanovené podmínky pro přijetí. Jejich vyčleňování ze schengenského prostoru má negativní dopad nejen na samotné občany obou zemí, ale i na celý jednotný evropský trh. Z těchto důvodů jsem se také rozhodl prohlášení podpořit.
Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (A9-0234/2022 - Ismail Ertug)
Návrh opatření, které reguluje rozmístění infrastruktury pro alternativní paliva a je součásti balíčku „Fit for 55“, jsem podpořil, jelikož toto opatření zajistí napříč celou Evropskou unií veřejně dostupnou, hustou a široce rozšířenou síť dobíjecích a čerpacích stanic s alternativními palivy. Cílem návrhu je zaručit dostatečný počet těchto stanic pro potřeby volné přeshraniční dopravy zejména v místě koridorů tzv. transevropské dopravní sítě (TEN-T). To se týká nejen silniční dopravy, ale dále i železniční, letecké a námořní dopravy. Návrh navíc nastavuje i minimální cíle pokrytí až do roku 2030, čímž by mělo docházet k postupnému navyšování těchto kapacit. Jsem přesvědčen, že se jedná o správnou cestu, jelikož díky tomuto opatření budou moci všichni občané, kteří využívají dopravní prostředky na alternativní pohon, cestovat bez obtíží po celé EU.
Non-recognition of Russian travel documents issued in occupied foreign regions (C9-0302/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o neuznávání cestovních dokumentů vydaných Ruskem na jím okupovaných území jsem podpořil, jelikož anexe Krymu, okupace části ukrajinského území a okupace části gruzínského území je zcela nelegální a jedná se o přímé porušení mezinárodního práva. Rusko navíc vydává své cestovní pasy lidem žijícím na dotyčných územích dlouhodobě. V Gruzii (Abcházii a Jižní Osetii) již od roku 2008, na Krymu od jeho anexe v roce 2014 a v současnosti i v dalších okupovaných částech Ukrajiny. Většina členských států Evropské unie již tyto dokumenty nepřijímá, avšak ne všechny. Cílem návrhu je proto sjednotit postup členských států EU a dát Rusku jasně najevo, že jeho chování odsuzujeme a je pro nás zcela nepřijatelné. Toto rozhodnutí však nebrání nikomu dotyčná území opustit a vstoupit na území EU z humanitárních důvodů. Opatření se netýká ani samotných ukrajinských a gruzínských občanů žijících na daném území. Z těchto důvodů jsem se proto rozhodl návrh podpořit v urychleném postupu.
EU/Ukraine Agreement on the carriage of freight by road (A9-0263/2022 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Vzhledem k vojenské agresi Ruska na Ukrajině se dopravní situace pro tuto zemi velmi ztížila. Důležité dopravní cesty pro přepravu zboží přes Černé moře jsou blokovány nebo byly zničeny ruskými vojenskými silami a ukrajinský vzdušný prostor je uzavřen pro civilní dopravu. Železniční síť je v současnosti prioritou pro přepravu cestujících a uprchlíků a zůstává velmi zranitelnou vůči ruskému bombardování. Abychom pomohli ukrajinské ekonomice, která je pod velkým nátlakem, podpořil jsem uzavření dohody mezi EU a Ukrajinou. Dohoda je velmi důležitá pro obchod s obilím, palivem, potravinami a dalším zbožím, který je třeba urychleně řešit, aby se snížila potravinová nejistota na Ukrajině a zabránilo se zhoršování odlivu uprchlíků. Dohoda rovněž obsahuje doložky o uznávání řidičských průkazů a osvědčení o odborné způsobilosti pro ukrajinské řidiče přepravující zboží do EU.
EU/Moldova Agreement on the carriage of freight by road (A9-0262/2022 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Konflikt Ruska na Ukrajině nutí moldavské provozovatele silniční dopravy hledat alternativní trasy, aby se vyhnuli území Ukrajiny, což byl dosud jediný způsob, jak se dostat na trhy třetích zemí, v jehož důsledku se dopravní situace pro Moldavsko velmi ztížila. Moldavští dopravci však nemají dostatečná povolení pro nezbytný tranzit členských států. To ohrožuje plnění dlouhodobých kontraktů na dodávky zboží (zejména zemědělských produktů) s jejich obchodními partnery. Zvyšuje se také potřeba bilaterálních přepravních operací mezi Moldavskem a EU. Rozšíření přepravních práv pro moldavské dopravce a udělení recipročních práv dopravcům z EU by umožnilo EU také vyvážet více zboží do Moldavska. Dohodu jsem podpořil, neboť je nutné urychleně uzavřít dohodu mezi Unií a Moldavskem, jejímž prostřednictvím bude možné zablokované tranzitní trasy přes Ukrajinu v co nejlepším rozsahu nahradit posílenou alternativní silniční dopravou prostřednictvím EU. Dohoda by měla trvat tak dlouho, dokud dopad války na dopravní operace a ukrajinskou dopravní infrastrukturu zůstane závažný. Uzavření dohody je také v zájmu s ohledem na to, že se země musí vypořádat s přílivem uprchlíků prchajících před válkou.
Digital finance: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) (A9-0341/2021 - Billy Kelleher)
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) sets a foundation for EU financial regulators and supervisors to monitor whether firms are able to maintain resilient operations through a severe operational disruption. In particular, DORA considers the impact of 'third party providers' of critical ICT, including cloud services providers. It brings them under the scope of certain supervision by European supervisory authorities. It also works to harmonise ICT risk management rules across financial services sectors as well as incident classification and reporting.Overall, DORA will further protect financial systems and by extension, European citizens and therefore I vote in favour of the agreed text. It will help citizens have further confidence in the IT infrastructure they use in their financial transactions, which is particularly important as we move to a more digitalised financial environment. Integrity of the systems and supervisory oversight will help to improve cybersecurity across the EU. Protecting the financial system from cyberattacks and cyberfraud is particularly important in the contemporary environment.
REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans (A9-0260/2022 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoş Pîslaru)
Návrh Komise ohledně začlenění opatření RePowerEU do národních plánů obnovy jsem podpořil, jelikož tento návrh přináší nové finanční nástroje, které umožňují členským státům rychlejší a flexibilnější financování jejich energetické transformace. Cílem návrhu je, aby se Unie stala co možná nejrychleji nezávislou na dodávkách ruských fosilních paliv a došlo k zajištění její energetické bezpečnosti i do budoucna, což považuji v době aktuální energetické krize za klíčové. Návrh počítá i s tím, že tato energetická transformace by měla vést k většímu využití ekologických a nízkoemisních zdrojů a měla by být prováděna ve spolupráci mezi všemi členskými státy. Ve svém hlasování jsem proto návrh na RePower EU podpořil, ale také jsem jasně podpořil zachování investic do ropné infrastruktury na území EU.
Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Croatia (A9-0264/2022 - Paulo Rangel)
Návrh o plném uplatňování schengenského acquis (práva) v Chorvatsku jsem podpořil, jelikož Chorvatsko splnilo všechny stanovené podmínky pro přijetí a jeho začlenění do tohoto prostoru je důležitým krokem k dokončení integrace celého Schengenu. Díky němu totiž občané EU mohou naplno využívat svobod evropské integrace, zejména volného pohybu, napříč celou Unií, přičemž plné začlenění Chorvatska do Schengenu přinese výhody nejen samotným Chorvatům, ale i ostatním občanům EU. Jednou z nich je například ta, že se turisté z EU již nebudou muset zdržovat na hranicích pasovou kontrolou. Plně podporuji začlenění i dalších členských států EU do schengenského prostoru, jako v případě Rumunska a Bulharska, které podmínky pro vstup také splňují. Na základě těchto důvodů jsem se rozhodl návrh podpořit.
Resilience of critical entities (A9-0289/2021 - Michal Šimečka)
Hybridní působení, kybernetické útoky, pandemie koronaviru i probíhající válka na Ukrajině ukazují šíři možných hrozeb, kterým v současné době čelíme. Hlasoval jsem pro novou směrnici o ochraně kritické infrastruktury, která bere novou realitu možných hrozeb a kybernetických útoků v potaz. Například rozšiřuje množinu oblastí spadajících mezi kritická odvětví. Zahrnuje tak dopravu, zdravotnický systém, dodávky vody a tepla, energetiku nebo v neposlední řadě také finanční služby. Návrh se také zabývá přeshraniční dimenzí kritické infrastruktury. Hrozby nejčastěji přicházejí ze třetích zemí, navíc ve stále více propojeném světě dopadají hrozby a jejich často ničivé následky na více zemí najednou. Tato směrnice nabízí řadu nástrojů, jak se na tyto situace připravit, jak posílit naši vzájemnou odolnost a jak čelit hrozbám ve chvíli, kdy nastanou.
Drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers: initial qualification and periodic training (codification) (A9-0267/2022 - Angel Dzhambazki)
Účelem návrhu je provedení kodifikace směrnice o základní kvalifikaci a pravidelném školení řidičů některých silničních vozidel pro přepravu zboží nebo cestujících. Novou směrnici jsem podpořil, neboť nahradí různé akty, které jsou do ní začleněny, a plně zachová obsah kodifikovaných aktů. Směrnice se omezuje pouze na jejich spojení s formálními změnami, které vyžaduje samotná kodifikace. Kodifikace pomůže k ucelení právní úpravy a nabídne přehlednější rámec, zjednodušení a přehlednější uspořádání práva Unie, aby se stalo srozumitelnějším a přístupnějším pro občany.
Recognising the Russian Federation as a state sponsor of terrorism (RC-B9-0482/2022, B9-0482/2022, B9-0483/2022, B9-0485/2022, B9-0486/2022, B9-0487/2022)
Vzhledem k vývoji situace kolem ruské agrese na Ukrajině, konkrétně cíleným útokům na civilní infrastrukturu a brutálnímu chování Ruska a jím podporovaných jednotek k civilnímu obyvatelstvu na území Ukrajiny, jsem se rozhodl rezoluci Evropského parlamentu o uznání Ruské federace za stát, který podporuje terorismus, podpořit. Ruská federace se na území Ukrajiny dopouští vážného porušení mezinárodního a humanitárního práva, a to jak vlastními aktivitami ruské armády, tak také prostřednictvím financování paramilitantních jednotek, jako např. Wagnerova skupina. Tato rezoluce odsuzuje chování Ruska, vyzývá ke zvážení zařazení Ruska na oficiální seznam států podporujících terorismus a žádá po Radě Evropské unie, aby dotyčné ruské paramilitantní jednotky byly zařazeny na unijní seznam teroristických organizací.
'Macro-Financial Assistance+' instrument for providing support to Ukraine for 2023 (C9-0373/2022)
Návrh Komise o nástroji makrofinanční pomoci Ukrajině pro rok 2023 jsem podpořil. Ruská invaze a pokračující bombardování kritické infrastruktury na Ukrajině má devastující účinek na ukrajinskou ekonomiku a obyvatelstvo. Jsem přesvědčen, že Evropská unie by měla Ukrajině v této těžké situaci co nejrychleji pomoci obnovit její makroekonomickou a sociální stabilitu a zejména zmíněnou kritickou infrastrukturu, což jsou i hlavní cíle návrhu Komise. Konkrétně návrh dává Ukrajině možnost půjčit si na tyto výdaje od Evropské unie v roce 2023 celkem až 18 miliard eur. Tato pomoc společně s ostatními formami již poskytované pomoci ze strany EU pomůže Ukrajině odolat ruské agresi a připravit podmínky pro její poválečnou obnovu.
Non-recognition of Russian travel documents issued in occupied foreign regions (C9-0302/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o neuznávání cestovních dokumentů vydaných Ruskem na jím okupovaných územích jsem podpořil, jelikož anexe Krymu, okupace části ukrajinského území a okupace části gruzínského území je zcela nelegální a jedná se o přímé porušení mezinárodního práva. Rusko navíc vydává své cestovní pasy lidem žijícím na dotyčných územích dlouhodobě. V Gruzii (Abcházii a Jižní Osetii) již od roku 2008, na Krymu od jeho anexe v roce 2014 a v současnosti i v dalších okupovaných částech Ukrajiny. Většina členských států Evropské unie již tyto dokumenty nepřijímá, avšak ne všechny. Cílem návrhu je proto sjednotit postup členských států EU a dát Rusku jasně najevo, že jeho chování odsuzujeme a je pro nás zcela nepřijatelné. Toto rozhodnutí však nebrání nikomu dotyčná území opustit a vstoupit na území EU z humanitárních důvodů. Opatření se netýká ani samotných ukrajinských a gruzínských občanů žijících na daném území.
Recommendation for a decision not to oppose a delegated act: temporary emergency measures on collateral requirements (B9-0491/2022)
I voted in favour of the early non-objection to the delegated act relating to collateral requirements for non-financial counterparties. This delegated act will allow NFCs, in particular energy companies, to post collateral following a margin call from a CCP in the form of public guarantees and uncollateralised bank deposits. This extends the possibilities for NFCs to meet the margin calls, which is particularly important for them given that often they do not deal directly in cash, which is the normal form of collateral that is required to be posted in the event of a margin call. This measure is temporary and will be fully reviewed in the coming months. However, adopting this delegated act early gives more certainty to energy companies and to the markets, and will reduce the risk of failing to meet margin calls in the current volatility.
Recommendation for a decision not to oppose a delegated act: value of the clearing threshold for positions held in OTC commodity derivative contracts and other OTC derivative contracts (B9-0490/2022)
I supported the early non-objection to the delegated act revising clearing thresholds for non-financial counterparties under the EMIR Regulation. Given the volatility seen in the energy markets in recent months, and following ESMA advice on the matter, I believe the Commission was right to revise upwards the threshold at which NFCs are subject to margin calls. The increase will give flexibility to energy companies as they struggle to deal with volatility following in particular the war in Ukraine.
Application of Articles 93, 107 and 108 of the TFEU to certain categories of State aid in the rail, inland waterway and multimodal transport sector (A9-0285/2022 - Eva Maria Poptcheva)
I voted in favour of Parliament's position on the Council regulation on the application of a number of Treaty articles to certain categories of state aid in the rail, inland waterway and multimodal transport sector. The proposal ensures that two categories of aid under Article 108(3) TFEU are exempted from the notification requirement. Specifically, these deal with aid for the coordination of transport and also aid for the reimbursement for the discharge of certain obligations inherent in the concept of a public service. Parliament followed a simplified procedure in order to enable the Council to accelerate its finalisation of the file. I therefore believe that this Council regulation should come into force quickly in order to reduce administrative burdens on Member States when it comes to reporting requirements vis-à-vis the European Commission.
Towards equal rights for persons with disabilities (A9-0284/2022 - Anne-Sophie Pelletier)
Práva a začlenění všech osob se zdravotním postižením v Evropě do společnosti bez ohledu na jejich pohlaví, rasový nebo etnický původ, víru, věk nebo sexuální orientaci musí být plně zaručena prostřednictvím politik a právních předpisů vypracovaných na národní, regionální a místní úrovni, které se řídí evropskými standardy. Podpořil jsem návrh, aby měly osoby se zdravotním postižením stejné právo žít nezávisle a být začleněny do společnosti. EU a členské státy by tak měly zajistit, aby osoby se zdravotním postižením měly rovné příležitosti vést volební kampaň, účastnit se jí, stejně tak vykonávat evropské volební právo.
A long-term vision for the EU's rural areas (A9-0269/2022 - Isabel Carvalhais)
Sdělení Evropské komise stanovuje dlouhodobou vizi pro venkovské oblasti EU do roku 2040. Plán identifikuje oblasti činnosti směrem k silnějším, odolnějším a prosperujícím venkovským oblastem, které jsou klíčové pro zajištění produkce potravin a soběstačnosti, pro ochranu přírodních zdrojů, krajiny a biologické rozmanitosti. Plán jsem podpořil, protože potřebujeme společnou celoevropskou definici funkčních venkovských oblastí, které zahrnují rozlišení mezi venkovskými a příměstskými oblastmi, a rozlišit specifika těchto oblastí. To zahrnuje zajištění odpovídajících podmínek života, zejména zdravotní péče, služby, vzdělávání, školení, rekvalifikace a celoživotní učení nebo sociální péče o děti a seniory.
Action plan to boost long-distance and cross-border passenger rail (A9-0242/2022 - Annalisa Tardino)
Akční plán jsem podpořil jako stínový zpravodaj, jeho cílem je posílit dálkovou a přeshraniční osobní železniční dopravu v kombinaci se změnami v transevropské dopravní síti (TEN-T) za účelem zvýšení kapacity vysokorychlostní železnice. Součástí plánu je také nová podpora Evropské investiční banky (EIB) investice do železnice. Akční plán staví na zkušenostech Evropského roku železnic (2021) a měl by pomoci dosáhnout cíl zdvojnásobení vysokorychlostní železniční dopravy do roku 2030 a její ztrojnásobení do roku 2050.K překonání překážek akční plán představuje např. urychlení digitalizace, zavedení udržitelné přeshraniční multimodální hromadné dopravy prostřednictvím závazků veřejné služby, odstranění nadbytečných vnitrostátních technických a provozních pravidel, zajištění lepší dostupnosti vlaků, vagonů a lokomotiv, školení a certifikace železničního personálu v souladu s rozvojem železnic, modernizaci železniční infrastruktury nebo uživatelsky přívětivější jízdenky a přístup k železničnímu systému. Plán se také snaží přiblížit sektor mladým lidem a tím jej zatraktivnit.
Digital divide: the social differences created by digitalisation (B9-0550/2022)
Digitalizace nabízí nové výhody a příležitosti, ale má také hluboký dopad, který zvýrazňuje sociální rozdíly a vytváří socioekonomické rozdíly mezi lidmi a zeměmi. Je proto důležité začlenění těch, kteří se také chtějí digitálně stát gramotnými, ale i těch, kteří nemají takovou možnost. Návrh poukazuje na to, že by nemělo docházet k diskriminaci na základě digitálních dovedností člověka a nelze vyloučit jednotlivce z přístupu k základním službám, a také proto jsem jej podpořil.
EU/New Zealand Agreement: exchange of personal data between Europol and New Zealand (A9-0003/2023 - Annalisa Tardino)
I voted in favour of the proposed EU-New Zealand agreement on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the authorities of New Zealand competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The strategic cooperation between these authorities will lead to the prevention of crime, including organized crime and terrorism. The aim of the proposal is to enable the exchange of personal data in an effort to strengthen operational capabilities and improve cooperation between the authorities. The ability to share information is an important tool in the current globalized era to fight organized crime, terrorism, corruption, cybercrime, money laundering or drug trafficking. At the same time, this agreement ensures respect for fundamental human rights and individual freedoms. New Zealand has advanced data protection legislation, and has an independent data protection authority (and is therefore a reliable treaty partner). In addition, the European Data Protection Board has expressed the view that this treaty could form the basis for future personal data exchange agreements for data enforcement purposes.
Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence: Second Additional Protocol (A9-0002/2023 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Účelem přijetí druhého dodatkového protokolu k Úmluvě o počítačové kriminalitě o posílené spolupráci a zpřístupňování elektronických důkazů je posílení pravomocí orgánů činných v trestném řízení. Dodatkový protokol jsem podpořil, protože dává nástroje pro boj s kybernetickou kriminalitou. Tyto nástroje, jako je například přímá spolupráce s poskytovateli služeb a registrátory, usnadňují spolupráci a zpřístupňují elektronické důkazy. Tento dodatkový protokol navazuje na Budapešťskou konvenci, která je nejzásadnější mezinárodní úmluvou v oblasti kybernetické kriminalitou a elektronických důkazů.
30th Anniversary of the Single Market (B9-0004/2023)
Prohlášení k 30. výročí Evropského jednotného trhu jsem na plenárním zasedání podpořil. Jednotný trh přinesl Evropanům výhody prostřednictvím volné hospodářské soutěže, spravedlivých pravidel a svobody žít, pracovat, nakupovat a možnosti odejít do důchodu kdekoli v Evropě. Usnesení, které bylo schváleno velkou většinou poslanců, má za cíl dále pokračovat ve správné implementaci a dodržování již schválené legislativy. Cílem je posílení a zvýšení odolnosti společného trhu. Usnesení také vyzývá Evropskou komisi k vytvoření další vize a členské státy k podpoře vzájemných vztahů a spolupráce.
EU response to the protests and executions in Iran (RC-B9-0066/2023, B9-0062/2023, B9-0066/2023, B9-0067/2023, B9-0070/2023, B9-0079/2023, B9-0080/2023)
I voted in favour of the Parliament's resolution on the EU response to the protests and execution in Iran. I condemn in the strongest terms the death sentences against and executions of peaceful protesters in Iran. First, the resolution seeks to increase the EU’s diplomatic pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran and its leaders. Through this resolution, the European Parliament calls for the extension of the sanctions list to all individuals and groups responsible for human rights violations. Second, the resolution demands the listing of the IRGC, Basij militia and Quds Force as terrorist organisations. This resolution is a response to protests, which were launched by the death of Mahsa Amini in September 2022, continue to gather widespread public support and demonstrate the will of the Iranian people to resist the repressive forces. It is important to voice support for this civic activity and to punish those who use violence against peaceful protesters.
European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union (ESA 2010) (A9-0202/2022 - Irene Tinagli)
I supported the proposal for an amending Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 and repealing 11 legal acts in the field of national accounts. The updated regulation reacts to changes in the methodology regarding digitalisation or new funds, such as NextGenerationEU, and adjusting definitions in the form of the currently accepted wording in accounting systems. This technical update is a significant improvement for the function of the European single market. The updated regulation will be enacted on 1 September 2024.
Union's rights in enforcing and implementing the UK Withdrawal Agreement and the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (A9-0248/2022 - Seán Kelly, Andreas Schieder, Danuta Maria Hübner)
. – I voted in favour of Union’s rights in enforcing and implementing the UK Withdrawal Agreement and the EU—UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. The extension of the uniform procedure is a requisite step ahead. This will guarantee the unaltered approach that will correspond to previous enforcement. Furthermore, this provision will ensure adequate transparency for the European Parliament and Member States. Onwards, the agreement and successful vote supports further efforts in the negotiations with the UK and facilitates compliance with the already—agreed Agreements, especially in the case of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland. The European Parliament will continue to be able to monitor, together with the Council, compliance with the negotiated agreements, and the Commission has an obligation to report on the negotiations in a timely and detailed manner.
Union Secure Connectivity Programme 2023-2027 (A9-0249/2022 - Christophe Grudler)
I voted in favour of the Union Secure Connectivity Programme 2023-2027. Satellite communications security is now a critical element of the European security sphere. This proposal aims to establish a communications network that meets the highest security criteria, and concurrently the network should be resilient and flexible to serve the European Union and Member States. The programme will deploy an EU satellite constellation – ‘IRIS2’– which will ensure European strategic autonomy and digital sovereignty.
REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans (A9-0260/2022 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoş Pîslaru)
. – I supported the regulation of the REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans. This regulation aims to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, especially from the Russian Federation, whose unprovoked and illegal military invasion of Ukraine has recalled the important European task of energy independence. Renewable energy sources and infrastructure are essential points for building energy independence. REPowerEU brings investments to strengthen and develop energy infrastructure. The European Parliament has advocated for greater transparency in financing these projects and has also pushed for increased representation of cross-border projects in REPowerEU. I regret that fossil fuel infrastructure projects, which would ensure the replacement of Russian fossil fuel supplies, were not included in the regulation because I insist on the need to ensure energy independence in the current geopolitical situation. Nevertheless, the REPowerEU is a vital regulation that must be implemented urgently.
CO2 emission standards for cars and vans (A9-0150/2022 - Jan Huitema)
. – Normy pro emise CO2 pro osobní automobily a lehká užitková vozidla jsem nepodpořil z několika důvodů. Revize stávající emisní normy s účelem naplnit nové cíle Evropské unie v oblasti klimatu stanovené evropským zákonem o klimatu neodpovídá reálným možnostem. Nařízení upřednostňuje bezemisní elektrovozidla, nezohledňuje jiná technologická řešení a zcela vylučuje další využívání technologie spalovacího motoru. Nařízení navíc nerespektuje fakt, že zatím není k dispozici dostatečná dobíjecí infrastruktura. Dopady nadměrných ambicí nařízení jenom prohloubí sociální rozdíly a výrazně stíží mobilitu slabších sociálních vrstev.
Amendments to the European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) Regulation (A9-0196/2022 - Michiel Hoogeveen)
. – I supported ELTIFs Regulation as it removes a number of hurdles that made it difficult for uptake in ELTIFs under the original regulation and it strengthens the Capital Markets Union. Specifically, it will help citizens channel their savings into more secure, long-term investments, with opportunities for higher returns than traditional savings accounts by encouraging both fund managers and citizens to invest in creating and buying into an ELTIF. The ELTIFs Regulation strengthens consumer protection, adds a lower minimum investment for consumers, allowing more to in these relatively stable types of funds, while at the same time loosens the fund management rules to encourage more European long-term investment funds to be created. The goal is to feed long-term capital into our economy for productive purposes. With well-designed frameworks for investments in capital markets, as well as increased financial literacy, we are able to then further support investments in our long-term projects, and particularly in growing our SMEs in this tough economic environment.
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (A9-0033/2023 - Ciarán Cuffe)
Hlasoval jsem proti návrhu směrnice, která ukládá povinnost snižovat energetickou náročnost budov. I když je důležité snižovat spotřebu energií v budovách, musíme také brát v úvahu veškeré související náklady na tato opatření a situaci jednotlivých členských zemí. Je správné, že směrnice rozlišuje mezi rezidenčním bydlením a kancelářskými budovami. Zvyšování energetické účinnosti administrativních budov je žádoucí a také únosné z hlediska nákladů. I tak je ale třeba dbát na to, aby náklady na investice do energetické účinnosti nebyly přemrštěné pro malé a střední podniky. Co ale nepovažuji za přijatelné, je, aby se naprosto stejné požadavky vztahovaly i na rezidenční budovy. To bude znamenat pro domácnosti často neúnosné náklady například na povinné zateplení nebo nové druhy vytápění. Realizace těchto opatření také mohou vést k nárůstu cen nájmů a nemovitostí, což si v současné situaci nemůžeme dovolit.
Data Act (A9-0031/2023 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
Nařízení o harmonizovaných pravidlech pro spravedlivý přístup k datům a jejich využití, takzvaný akt o datech, jsem na plenárním zasedání podpořil. Nařízení pomáhá nastavit spravedlivé zacházení s daty. Posiluje postavení vlastníků dat, zvyšuje transparentnost nakládání s daty a zajišťuje celkově větší kontrolu pro občany EU. Dále podporuje přístup k datům a jejich možné využití pro třetí strany. Upravuje také práva a povinnosti spojené s daty shromážděnými produkty, jejich předávání mezi cloudovými službami či ochranu tajemství a práv duševního vlastnictví. Jedná se tedy o důležité nařízení, které reaguje na potřeby stále postupující digitalizace. Umožňuje občanům větší kontrolu nad vlastními daty, ukládá povinnosti pro držitele dat a definuje podmínky pro sdílení dat v různých případech.
Implementation report on the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU (A9-0052/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
I supported the agreement on the Windsor Framework, as I believe it is an essential component to further cooperation between the UK and the EU in terms of future relations. This framework applies specifically to address some of the shortcomings that concerned some in Northern Ireland in relation to the Northern Ireland Protocol.The EU has shown flexibility to be able to address the UK and unionist concerns in Northern Ireland, and I am hopeful that the agreement will also receive full support in the UK, but also broadly across the population of Northern Ireland. I believe Northern Ireland now has some unique opportunities, benefiting from access not only of course to the UK market, but also to the EU’s single market as concerns goods. I look forward to this agreement, to improving relations between the UK and the EU, and to enhancing cooperation over a number of policy areas where we still need to find solutions following the UK leaving the EU.
European Year of Skills 2023 (A9-0028/2023 - Loucas Fourlas)
Evropský rok dovedností jsem podpořil z několika důvodů. Upozorňuje na důležitost posilování schopností jednotlivců a firem získávat potřebné dovednosti. To je zvláště důležité vzhledem k rychlému tempu technologických změn. Dle statistik více než tři čtvrtiny podniků v EU eviduje potíže při hledání pracovníků s potřebnými dovednostmi. Proto je nezbytné, aby lidé měli přístup ke kvalitnímu vzdělání a odborné přípravě, aby se mohli úspěšně uplatnit na trhu práce. Tato podpora je pozitivním krokem směrem k vytvoření více schopné a přizpůsobivé pracovní síly a podpoře hospodářského růstu a inovací v Evropě. Je také důležité brát v úvahu nedostatek zaměstnanců v určitých oblastech, jako jsou stavebnictví, zdravotní péče, strojírenství a informační technologie. Tyto oblasti jsou klíčové pro ekologickou a digitální transformaci a konkurenceschopnost EU. Je proto nezbytné podpořit vzdělávání v těchto oblastech.
General Product Safety Regulation (A9-0191/2022 - Dita Charanzová)
I supported the final version of the General Product Safety Regulation, which updates the General Product Safety Directive of 2001to bring the rules and safety net for consumers in line with the current reality of growing e-commerce and the shift away from in-store purchasing to online purchasing. E-commerce operators in particular will need to ensure that they have a single point of contact for product safety and also keep track of the sellers on their platforms. It should also make it easier for consumers to get refunds, return faulty products and get replacements. This Regulation is in line with our broad objective in Europe to better reflect digitalisation and the new paradigm of commerce across the globe, and to ensure that platform operators, buyers and sellers are better protected and also understand their obligations. Together with other pieces of legislation such as the Digital Services Act, it is positive to see Europe moving forward in matching legislation to this new reality.
Fluorinated Gases Regulation (A9-0048/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
Nemohl jsem podpořit návrh nařízení upravující množství emisí fluorovaných skleníkových plynů. V návrhu vidím několik nebezpečí, která by mohla mít negativní dopady. Příkladem těchto dopadů je vyšší koncová cena pro spotřebitele u běžných spotřebičů nebo nedostatečná energetická účinnost spotřebičů při užití alternativních substancí. F-plyny jsou náhradou za freony, a tudíž nemají škodlivý vliv na ozonovou vrstvu. Jsou to skleníkové plyny, které bohužel nemají vhodnou náhradu, a jejichž alternativy mají řadu nedostatků. Nový systém povolenek a snaha omezení některých použití F-plynů by způsobila nedostupnost nových tepelných čerpadel a také omezila možnost opravovat stávající přístroje. Současné nařízení o fluorovaných plynech z roku 2014 je již plně v souladu s Montrealským protokolem a další zpřísnění pravidel je nad rámec této mezinárodní dohody.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System (A9-0162/2022 - Peter Liese)
Revizi systému EU pro obchodování s povolenkami jsem nepodpořil. Další úpravy systému ETS ve výsledku povedou k výraznému navýšení už teď vysokých cen energií. Nejvíce opět budou zasaženy nejzranitelnější skupiny obyvatel, ale i malé a střední podniky. V čase, kdy v důsledku ruské agrese je energetický trh volatilní, musíme opatrně volit nástroje pro snižování emisí skleníkových plynů. Škody způsobené novým systémem ETS na konkurenceschopnosti by nebyly dostatečně vyváženy benefity z nového ETS.
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange)
Podpořil jsem Sociální klimatický fond, jehož vznik pomůže subjektům, které budou mít nejvíce problémů vyrovnat se s dopady opatření v oblasti klimatické politiky, například v sektoru dopravy. Fond pomůže domácnostem, živnostníkům či malým podnikům, které budou ohroženy energetickou chudobou, nebo nebudou schopny vyrovnat se s růstem nákladů v oblasti dopravy. Fond bude financován z dražeb emisních povolenek a dalších zdrojů až do výše 65 miliard EUR, přičemž dalších 25 % bude hrazeno z národních zdrojů členských států.Nový Sociální klimatický fond bude k dispozici od roku 2026 a bude doplňovat existující programy, včetně například renovací, které jsou zaměřeny na nízkopříjmové domácnosti. Fond může sloužit také k financování projektů, které pomáhají snižovat negativní dopady změny klimatu, jako například zlepšení přístupu k energiím, zvýšení energetické účinnosti, zlepšení kvality ovzduší, omezování množství odpadů a další.
eGovernment accelerating digital public services that support the functioning of the single market (A9-0065/2023 - Tomislav Sokol)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy o urychlování digitální transformace veřejné správy pro podporu společného trhu. Tato zpráva se zaměřila hlavně na propojení eGovernmentu a podnikatelského prostředí s důrazem na malé a střední podniky. Mezi hlavní body zprávy patřila dostupnost vysokorychlostního internetu v rurálních oblastech a na ostrovech, digitalizace veřejné správy a zlepšení digitální gramotnosti. Zpráva zdůrazňuje spojení digitalizace a snižování nákladů a zjednodušení celních procedur. Pro rozvoj podnikatelského prostředí je digitalizace veřejné správy jedním z rozhodujících faktorů, a proto vnímám podobné zprávy jako velmi důležité.
Challenges facing the Republic of Moldova (B9-0197/2023, RC-B9-0198/2023, B9-0198/2023, B9-0199/2023, B9-0200/2023, B9-0203/2023, B9-0204/2023)
Podpořil jsem usnesení o výzvách, kterým čelí Moldavská republika. Moldavská republika je negativně ovlivněna ruskou agresí na Ukrajině. Tento akt agrese má závažné sociální, ekonomické a bezpečnostní dopady. Usnesení odsuzuje pokusy Ruské federace o destabilizaci Moldavska. Vyjadřuje solidaritu a podporuje teritoriální integritu Moldavské republiky. Evropský parlament v usnesení vyzývá Evropskou komisi, Evropskou službu pro vnější činnosti a Radu Evropské unie k posouzení podpůrných opatření moldavských státních institucí. Dále je oceněn přístup Moldavské republiky k lidem prchajícím z válečné zóny a kvituje se rozhodnutí poskytovat těmto lidem dočasnou ochranu.
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) (A9-0052/2022 - Stefan Berger)
I support the EU’s ground-breaking new framework for crypto-assets, in the form of the MiCA regulation, which will open a regulated environment in which crypto-assets can be issued, exchanged and traded. This comprehensive regulation brings into the EU’s regulatory sphere digital assets that have not yet been regulated. Issuers and service providers will be able to acquire licences to operate in the EU and consumers will benefit from the regulation in a number of ways, designed to enhance consumer protection in this rapidly developing sector of the economy.What is now most important is that regulators, both national and European, and stakeholders engage with each other to ensure a smooth implementation and importantly enforcement of the new rules, which will be in full application by 2025.
Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (A9-0081/2022 - Ernest Urtasun, Assita Kanko)
I supported the amendments to the Transfer of Funds Regulation in order to bring crypto-assets in line with other forms of payments when it comes to fund transfers. In order to effectively tackle issues such as fraudulent activity, illegal purchases and also to help mitigate against the evasion of sanctions, the EU must have a legal basis on which to act. The Transfer of Funds Regulation will now ensure identification, and in the vast majority of cases, verification of crypto-asset transfers. Crypto Asset Providers must perform enhanced due diligence on their clients and any suspicious transactions in crypto must be flagged to authorities. These amendments to the regulation are vital in the fight against fraud and money laundering in the crypto sector.
Application of Union tariff rate quotas and other import quotas to certain products transferred to Northern Ireland (A9-0164/2023 - Seán Kelly)
I supported the position expressed by the Parliament on the application of quotas, both Union tariff rate and other import quotas to certain products transferred to Northern Ireland. This regulation is important in the context of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and minimises the risks to the proper functioning of the internal market. This regulation is fully in line with the Withdrawal Agreement of the UK from the EU and also with the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol. It is also fully in line with the EU’s common commercial policy. Very specifically, the text amends certain provisions of the Regulation to allow for the free circulation of certain steel products between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, with safeguard measures in place and the possibility for the Commission to adopt delegated acts if necessary to address any potential unbalancing as regards the EU’s internal market.
Macro-financial assistance to Moldova (A9-0166/2023 - Markéta Gregorová)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem hlasoval pro podporu návrhu na navýšení makrofinanční podpory pro Moldavskou republiku. Moldavská republika je silně zasažena ruskou agresí na Ukrajině. Schválená makrofinanční pomoc je odpovědí na žádost o podporu stabilizace ekonomiky ze strany moldavské vlády. Tato pomoc je jasným signálem, že EU má blízký vztah s Moldavskou republikou a má zájem o její reformní směřování. Rozsah této pomoci je 145 milionů eur, z čehož se jedná o půjčku v maximální hodnotě 100 milionů eur a 45 milionů eur v grantových programech.
Critical technologies for security and defence (A9-0120/2023 - Riho Terras)
Hlasoval jsem pro podporu zprávy o plánu pro technologie s kritickým významem pro obranu a bezpečnost. Tato zpráva doplňuje dokument Evropské komise, která identifikovala klíčové oblasti, kde EU musí zlepšit svou připravenost na budoucí výzvy. Zpráva hovoří o nutnosti lepšího propojení evropského průmyslu, malých a středních firem, akademické sféry a členských států pro dosahování výsledků v oblasti vývoje a adaptace nových technologií. Dále zpráva zdůrazňuje nutnost větší absorpce investic a zdokonalení evropských inovací na poli obranných a bezpečnostních produktů. Zpráva si všímá materiálové situace v EU. Vyzývá k řešení této problematiky a kritizuje snížení rozpočtu Evropského obranného programu. Vnímám tuto zprávu jako krok správným směrem k dosažení bezpečnější EU.
Empowering consumers for the green transition (A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan)
Podpořil jsem návrh směrnice o posílení postavení spotřebitelů. Směrnice označuje dvojí kvalitu výrobků jako nekalou obchodní praktiku a dává možnost spotřebitelům se bránit. Dále zaručuje jasnější informace o produktech. Opatření má za cíl bojovat proti zavádějícím ekologickým informacím, tzv. greenwashingu. Dále směrnice bojuje proti zavádění konstrukčních prvků, které omezují životnost produktu. Spotřebitel bude lépe informován o odolnosti a opravitelnosti produktů. Návrh této směrnice je součástí širšího balíčku pro cirkulární ekonomiku.
Act in Support of Ammunition Production (C9-0161/2023)
Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o ustanovení aktu na podporu výroby munice jsem na plenárním zasedání podpořil. Toto nařízení reaguje na současnou situaci a napomáhá navýšení výrobních kapacit evropského obranného průmyslu, který byl koncipován v jiném geopolitickém kontextu. Navyšování kapacit obranného průmyslu je v současné době důležitým prostředkem, jak zajistit dostatečné množství obranného materiálu pro státy EU a zároveň pomoci Ukrajině. Nařízení pomůže posílit průmysl investicemi do jeho rozvoje, vytvořit granty a dá možnost upřednostňovat objednávky na příslušné obranné produkty dle aktuálních potřeb. V neposlední řadě nařízení pomůže vyřizovat administrativní požadavky na certifikaci produktů nebo plánování a výstavbu výrobních zařízení nejrychlejším zákonným způsobem.
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (A9-0184/2023 - Lara Wolters)
I voted against the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive in plenary. Although the directive requires companies to tackle risks and adverse impacts on good governance, I consider this to be very problematic in terms of compliance. I do not think that it is appropriate for a great deal of obligations to fall on the shoulders of business representatives, because the extent of these obligations is beyond the capabilities of the vast majority of them, especially in case of small and medium—sized companies. I have concerns about the administrative and financial burden that the new rules will place on businesses, including the need for advisory helplines or paying external consultants to map suppliers’ leaked emissions.
Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (A9-0173/2023 - Paolo De Castro)
Podpořil jsem návrh zeměpisných označení z několika důvodů, prvním důvodem je rozšíření působnosti nařízení na více zemědělských produktů, což přispěje k jejich ochraně a podpoře různorodosti a kvality. Druhým důvodem je snaha o zjednodušení a harmonizaci postupů při žádosti o registraci nových názvů a úpravách specifikací produktů, což usnadní a zrychlí proces registrace. Třetím důvodem je podpora udržitelných praktik výrobců, což je důležité pro ochranu životního prostředí a zajištění dlouhodobého fungování zemědělského sektoru. Čtvrtým důvodem je zvýšení ochrany při online prodeji, což je v dnešní digitální době klíčové pro ochranu zeměpisných označení před zneužitím. V neposlední řadě je také důležité posílit práva skupin výrobců a zavést uznávané skupiny výrobců, které budou mít více pravomocí a odpovědností v rámci ochrany a správy geografických označení.
Arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on structuring their interaction practices in the area of central banking (A9-0158/2023 - Salvatore De Meo)
Dialogue between the ECB and the European Parliament is crucial in terms of the democratic accountability of the ECB to European citizens. This is enshrined in the provisions of the EU Treaties. Therefore I supported the Parliament’s decision as regards enhancing cooperation and dialogue in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the institutions.On the ECB side, it is positive that we will maintain the trimestral structured dialogue with the President of the ECB in the European Parliament and the possibility to have written questions from Members of Parliament answered by the ECB. Furthermore, ad hoc interactions and informal visits between the ECB and the European Parliament can enhance the accountability of the ECB to European citizens.From the European Parliament side, it is also positive that we work towards better considering the ECB opinions in legislative matters of concern regarding financial stability and monetary policy. This can lead to better regulation and enhance understanding among members of the importance of certain aspects of legislative proposals affecting these key areas of the ECB’s mandate.
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Moldovan products under the EU/Euratom/Moldova Association Agreement (A9-0219/2023 - Markéta Gregorová)
Podpořil jsem nařízení o dočasných obchodně-liberalizačních opatřeních doplňujících obchodní koncese platné pro moldavské výrobky podle dohody o přidružení. Ruská válka na Ukrajině negativně ovlivnila schopnost Moldavska obchodovat se světem. Toto nařízení prohlubuje hospodářskou integraci s EU skrze pozastavená cla a systém vstupních cen u některých výrobků. Předpokladem pro tyto obchodně-liberalizační opatření je splnění podmínek, jako například dodržování pravidel původu, zdržení se zavádění nových cel nebo poplatků a dodržování demokratických zásad a lidských práv. Evropská komise bude trh monitorovat a v případě negativního vývoje má možnost cla znovu zavést.
EU/Japan Agreement: air services (A9-0221/2023 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
Hlasoval jsem pro dohodu mezi EU a Japonskem o leteckých službách, protože tato dohoda je důležitým krokem k harmonizaci bilaterálních dohod o leteckých službách mezi 13 členskými státy EU a Japonskem s právem EU. V červnu 2003 Rada pověřila Evropskou komisi zahájit jednání s třetími zeměmi s cílem nahradit ustanovení v bilaterálních dohodách o leteckých službách. Jednání byla ukončena v únoru 2023 a nyní Rada žádala souhlas Evropského parlamentu v souladu s článkem 218 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie. Článek 2 této dohody nahrazuje tradiční ustanovení o určení, která umožňovala Japonsku odmítat nebo pozastavit povolení pro dopravce vlastněné nebo ovládané jinými členskými státy, čímž bylo porušováno právo EU. Namísto toho dohoda zavádí klauzuli o určení EU, která zajišťuje nediskriminační přístup k trasám mezi EU a Japonskem pro všechny letecké dopravce EU a chrání zásadu svobody usazování podle článku 49 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie. Dohoda s Japonskem tedy poslouží základnímu cíli vnější politiky Unie v oblasti letectví tím, že uvede stávající dvoustranné dohody o leteckých službách do souladu s právem Unie.
Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (A9-0234/2022 - Petar Vitanov)
Hlasoval jsem pro tento návrh nařízení, které zajišťuje dostupnost a použitelnost infrastruktury pro alternativní paliva v celé Evropské unii. Nařízení stanovuje povinné národní cíle pro rozvoj nabíjecích a tankovacích stanic pro silniční dopravu, plavidla a letadla. Hlavním cílem je zajistit odpovídající počet veřejně přístupných nabíjecích a tankovacích stanic, zejména s ohledem na volný přeshraniční pohyb. Zahrnuje minimální pokrytí nabíjecími body pro silniční vozidla a stanovuje cíle pro nabíjecí body a vodíkové tankovací stanice na síti TEN-T. Nařízení také zajišťuje dostupnost tankovacích stanic pro zkapalněný zemní plyn a vyžaduje dodávku elektřiny pro plavidla v přístavech a na vodních cestách. Členské státy jsou povinny zajistit dostatečný počet stanic. Podporuji toto nařízení, protože přispěje k rozvoji infrastruktury pro alternativní paliva.
European Chips Act (A9-0014/2023 - Dan Nica)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí aktu o čipech, který má posílit strategickou autonomii a bezpečnost Evropy v polovodičovém průmyslu. Cílem legislativy je podpořit výrobu čipů, inovace v odvětví a pomoci malým podnikům. Zahrnuje 3,3 miliardy EUR na výzkum a inovace. Právní předpis zřizuje mechanismus reakce na krizi pro řešení nedostatku dodávek, který Evropské komisi umožňuje provádět mimořádná opatření a koordinovat společné nákupy. Klade rovněž důraz na posílení mezinárodní spolupráce a ochranu práv duševního vlastnictví. Současný podíl Evropy na celosvětové výrobě čipů je nižší než 10 % a cílem legislativy je zvýšit jej na 20 %. Akt je v souladu s návrhy občanů z Konference o budoucnosti Evropy a podporuje rozšíření evropských technologií, bezpečnost dodávek a spolupráci mezi členskými státy.
Implementation of ‘passerelle’ clauses in the EU Treaties (A9-0208/2023 - Giuliano Pisapia)
I could not support Parliament’s report on the use of the passerelle clauses in decision-making in the EU. The report calls for many areas, as already outlined in the Treaties, to be subject to activation of the passerelle clauses in case unanimity is not achievable in negotiations. In practice, this would mean a move to QMV decision-making in a number of areas, which may be of particular importance to one or more Member State. Such decisions would include decisions on tax matters, which are identified in the Treaties as being a Member State competence. I cannot support moving to QMV in this area, as well as other areas such as foreign affairs and social policies. In addition, areas of taxation related to energy costs are identified as short-term priority areas, i.e. to be adopted by the end of this year. This would mean the Council taking decisions on such tax matters by QMV in the next six months. This is not realistic or desirable from my point of view.
Digital information exchange in terrorism cases (A9-0261/2022 - Patryk Jaki)
I supported the regulation on Digital Information Exchange in Terrorism Cases because information sharing is vital in combating terrorism. Under the existing regulation, Eurojust’s ability to identify the links between cross-border investigations is not sufficient. By strengthening the legal obligation of Member States to share data on terrorist offenses, we enhance Eurojust’s ability to identify connections, provide valuable feedback and enhance cooperation. Modernising and digitalising cross-border collaboration will ensure timely information exchange, which will lead to improved detection, investigation, prosecution and prevention of terrorist offenses. I believe the regulation has the potential to strengthen cooperation in the fight against terrorism.
Accession to the Schengen area (B9-0309/2023)
Hlasoval jsem pro usnesení, které nesouhlasí s rozhodnutím Rady odmítnout přistoupení Rumunska a Bulharska do schengenského prostoru. Připojil jsem se k výzvě, aby Rumunsko a Bulharsko mohlo přistoupit do schengenského prostoru do konce roku 2023. Usnesení dále zdůrazňuje nerovné podmínky, kterým čelí rumunští a bulharští občané, a vyzývá Radu, aby respektovala přístupový proces a hlasovala pro členství. V neposlední řadě vyzývá Komisi, aby analyzovala finanční ztráty a škody na životním prostředí, které Rumunsku, Bulharsku a EU jako celku vznikly v důsledku opožděného přistoupení. Usnesení zdůrazňuje, že rozšířený schengenský prostor bez kontrol na vnitřních hranicích posílí EU.
State of the EU-Cuba PDCA in the light of the recent visit of the High Representative to the island (RC-B9-0311/2023, B9-0311/2023, B9-0313/2023, B9-0320/2023, B9-0321/2023, B9-0322/2023)
Podpořil jsem rezoluci ke Kubě. Z dlouhodobého hlediska neustále dochází k potlačování základních lidských práv na Kubě a situace se i nadále zhoršuje i přes Dohodu o politickém dialogu a spolupráci (PDCA). Rezoluce toto naprosto odsuzuje a vyjadřuje politování v kontextu návštěvy Kuby vysokým představitelem Unie pro zahraniční věci a bezpečnostní politiku Josepem Borrellem, který se nesetkal s představiteli občanské společnosti, a tím nahrál do obecného narativu stávajícího režimu. Úkolem J. Borrella v kontextu vztahů s Kubou je jasná podpora nutnosti dodržovat lidská práva. V průběhu jeho poslední návštěvy na Kubě ovšem vysoký představitel promarnil možnost podpořit místní odvážné představitele občanské společnosti aktivně bojující za základní lidská práva na Kubě.
Act in Support of Ammunition Production (C9-0161/2023)
Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o ustanovení aktu na podporu výroby munice jsem na plenárním zasedání podpořil. Toto nařízení reaguje na současnou situaci a napomáhá navýšení výrobních kapacit evropské technologické a průmyslové základny obrany, která byla koncipována v jiném geopolitickém kontextu na omezené potřeby jednotlivých členských států. Navyšování kapacit obranného průmyslu je v současné době důležitým prostředkem, jak pomoci Ukrajině v boji proti agresorovi a zajistit dostatečné množství obranného materiálu pro státy EU. Nařízení pomůže posílit průmysl investicemi do jeho rozvoje, vytvořit granty a dá možnost upřednostňovat objednávky na příslušné obranné produkty dle aktuálních potřeb. V neposlední řadě nařízení pomůže vyřizovat administrativní požadavky na certifikaci produktů nebo plánování a výstavbu výrobních zařízení nejrychlejším zákonným způsobem.
State of the SME Union (RC-B9-0346/2023, B9-0346/2023, B9-0347/2023, B9-0348/2023, B9-0349/2023)
Hlasoval jsem na plénu pro rezoluci k podpoře malých a středních podniků. Z našich aktivit na podporu malých firem vyznívá jasně, že musíme dělat mnohem více. Musíme snížit administrativní zátěž a zjednodušit pravidla pro financování malých podniků tak, aby mohly prosperovat, a ne je dusit další a další evropskou legislativou. Je také důležité dokončit jednotný trh tak, aby malé firmy dostaly přístup i k zákazníkům po celé EU i k jiným zdrojům financování. Jediným naším úspěchem je obálka programu InvestEU, ale i ta by potřebovala navýšit. Přestože toto bude na příští Komisi a Parlamentu, je naší povinností zájmy malých a středních podniků prosazovat.
European Defence Industry Reinforcement through common Procurement Act (EDIRPA) (A9-0161/2023 - Michael Gahler, Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se stanoví akt o posílení evropského obranného průmyslu prostřednictvím kolaborativního zadávání veřejných zakázek. Toto nařízení reaguje na současnou geopolitickou situaci spojenou s válkou na Ukrajině a pomáhá rozvíjet obranný průmysl Unie. Doplňuje stávající programy a iniciativy EU, jako jsou například Evropský program rozvoje obranného průmyslu, Evropský obranný fond či Stálá strukturovaná spolupráce (PESCO). Členské státy EU díky společným akcím při zadávání veřejných zakázek zvýší úroveň interoperability a posílí obranné průmyslové kapacity Unie. Díky tomu bude unijní obranný průmysl schopen promptně reagovat na budoucí výzvy, zejména nedostatek kritických obranných produktů.
Consumer credits (A9-0212/2022 - Kateřina Konečná)
Podpořil jsem přijetí kompromisního textu směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o spotřebitelských úvěrech. Revize směrnice přizpůsobuje unijní pravidla týkající se spotřebitelských úvěrů potřebám dnešní doby, kterými jsou digitalizace a stále ještě dopady pandemie COVID-19 na společnost. Cílem směrnice je zavést harmonizovaná pravidla pro posuzování úvěruschopnosti spotřebitelů, zpřísnit pravidla pro nabídky úvěrů prostřednictvím reklamy, přijmout opatření, která zamezí poskytovatelům úvěrů nadsazovat ceny svých služeb, a v neposlední řadě uzákonit právo spotřebitele do 14 dnů odstoupit od smlouvy o úvěru bez udání důvodu. Díky novým pravidlům pro poskytování spotřebitelských úvěrů se v EU zvýší míra ochrany spotřebitelů a zároveň podpoří konkurenceschopnost legitimních poskytovatelů úvěrových služeb.
2022 Report on Türkiye (A9-0247/2023 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí výroční zprávy Komise o Turecku za rok 2022, která mimo jiné důsledně odsuzuje zpoždění ratifikace přistoupení Švédska do NATO ze strany Turecka a apeluje na její okamžité přijetí. Výroční zpráva Komise poukazuje na fakt, že Turecko nepatří mezi země podporující sankce vůči Rusku, a výslovně jej proto žádá, aby všemi dostupnými právními prostředky zajistilo, že na tureckém území nebude docházet k jejich obcházení. Zpráva uvádí, že za současných okolností nelze obnovit přístupová jednání s Tureckem, ale je třeba přehodnotit rámec vzájemné spolupráce a pro jeho účely adekvátně upravit znění asociační dohody.
Relations with Belarus (A9-0258/2023 - Petras Auštrevičius)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy o vztazích EU s Běloruskem, která silně odsuzuje represe a systematické porušování lidských práv ze strany Lukašenkova režimu a zapojení Běloruska do války na Ukrajině. Zpráva označuje Bělorusko za spoluviníka zločinů spáchaných ruskými složkami na Ukrajině, kritizuje jednání Lukašenkova režimu vůči politickým vězňům a osobám stíhaným z politicky motivovaných důvodů a vyjadřuje plnou podporu běloruské opozici v čele se Svjatlanou Cichanouskou. Evropský parlament proto ve zprávě o vztazích důsledně apeluje na členské státy EU, aby přijaly další sankční opatření vůči Rusku a Bělorusku, která postihnou širší okruh fyzických a právnických osob zodpovědných či podílejících se na závažném porušování lidských práv v zemi.
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (A9-0260/2023 - Nicola Beer)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem podpořil návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se stanoví rámec pro zajištění bezpečných a udržitelných dodávek kritických surovin. Nařízení je klíčové jak pro splnění cílů zelené a digitální transformace, tak pro zajištění strategické autonomie EU. Pokud chceme, aby se EU stala skutečně globálním geopolitickým lídrem, musíme se zbavit závislosti na dodávkách kritických nerostných surovin ze zemí s autoritářskými režimy. Návrh nařízení proto usiluje o větší diverzifikaci unijních dodavatelských řetězců, zlepšení oběhového hospodářství s kritickými surovinami v Unii a navázání nových strategických obchodních partnerství s demokratickými státy. Ke snížení unijní poptávky po kritických nerostných surovinách ze zahraničí a k zajištění dlouhodobé prosperity a konkurenceschopnosti má EU dále pomoci podpora výzkumu a inovací a za dodržení standardů ochrany životního prostředí i potenciální otevření nových těžařských lokalit v Evropě.
The future of the European book sector (A9-0257/2023 - Tomasz Frankowski)
Podpořil jsem přijetí usnesení Evropského parlamentu o budoucnosti evropského knižního odvětví, které reaguje na současnou situaci, kdy stále větší počet osob dává přednost sociálním sítím před četbou knih. Mou dlouhodobou vizí v Evropském parlamentu je podpora malých a středních podniků, a ty jsou spolu s mikropodniky pro sektor knih zásadní. Usnesení apeluje na vlády členských států, aby zmírnily regulační tlaky v odvětví a zvýšily investice do rozvoje elektronických knih. Cílem usnesení je zajistit, aby evropský knižní trh (včetně trhu s elektronickými knihami) byl nejenom kulturně rozmanitý, inkluzivní a svobodný, ale zejména aby byl dostupný pro širokou veřejnost a nabízel řadu příležitostí pro mladé Evropany. Nad rámec výše uvedeného dbá usnesení na ochranu spotřebitelů a vyzývá Komisi, aby usilovala o potírání dezinformací v knižním odvětví.
Economic coercion by third countries (A9-0246/2022 - Bernd Lange)
Podpořil jsem přijetí návrhu nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o ochraně Unie a jejích členských států před hospodářským nátlakem třetích zemí. Cílem nařízení je bránit ekonomické zájmy Unie ve světě a poskytnout členským státům a orgánům EU nástroje, jak účinně reagovat na případy, kdy se třetí stát dopouští nekalého jednání či dokonce hospodářského vydírání vůči EU. Toto nařízení umožní EU jednat jednotně, rychle a efektivně v případech, kdy je některý z jejích členských států ekonomicky napaden. Pokud bude zjištěno, že dochází ze strany třetího státu k ekonomickému nátlaku, budou vůči němu moci být uplatněna konkrétní protiopatření, například v podobě uvalení cel, omezení obchodní výměny či zamezení přístupu daného státu k veřejným zakázkám v rámci EU.
Intelligent Road Transport Systems (A9-0265/2022 - Rovana Plumb)
Na plenárním zasedání Evropského parlamentu ve Štrasburku jsem hlasoval pro přijetí revize směrnice o rámci pro zavedení inteligentních dopravních systémů v oblasti silniční dopravy a pro rozhraní s jinými druhy dopravy. Cílem návrhu je přispět k digitalizaci a větší odolnosti unijní dopravní infrastruktury. Chytrá mobilita je klíčem pro udržitelnost dopravy a pro dosažení cíle snížit emise v dopravním sektoru o 90 % do roku 2050. Díky širokému spektru informací, které budou poskytovány přímo uživatelům inteligentních dopravních systémů (dále jen „ITS“), umožní nasazení ITS v celoevropském kontextu bezpečnější, lépe koordinované a „chytré“ využívání dopravních sítí napříč členskými státy EU.
EU-Switzerland relations (A9-0248/2023 - Lukas Mandl)
Podpořil jsem přijetí zprávy o vztazích mezi EU a Švýcarskem, která vyzdvihuje stávající spolupráci v oblasti politiky, obchodu a vědy, ale zároveň usiluje o přijetí nového rámce dohod mezi oběma stranami. Zajištění stabilních vztahů mezi EU a Švýcarskem je klíčové pro řešení globálních krizí a geopolitických výzev, kterým členské státy EU v dnešní době čelí. Dle mého názoru je třeba vztahům mezi EU a Švýcarskem dodat nový impuls, který umožní hlubší a efektivnější spolupráci v klíčových oblastech, mezi něž patří zejména environmentální politika, energetická bezpečnost a otázky zahraniční politiky. Jen díky tomu budou v budoucnu z této vzájemné spolupráce založené na sdílených hodnotách, důvěře a rovných podmínkách profitovat jak občané EU, tak občané Švýcarska.
Scheme of generalised tariff preferences (A9-0267/2023 - Heidi Hautala)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem podpořil prodloužení platnosti nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady č. 978/2012 o uplatňování systému všeobecných celních preferencí (dále jen „GSP“), které původně mělo pozbýt platnosti s koncem letošního roku. Nové nařízení o uplatňování systému všeobecných celních preferencí, které by nahradilo to z roku 2012, je stále ve fázi interinstitucionálních jednání. Klíčové proto bylo zajistit kontinuitu fungování GSP i v nadcházejícím roce a poskytnout právní jistotu všem 60 státům a dvěma miliardám osob, které GSP využívají. Prodloužení platnosti stávajícího nařízení o 4 roky, tedy do konce roku 2027, zajistí hospodářským subjektům a zvýhodněným zemím jasná, předvídatelná a kontinuální pravidla využívání výhod GSP i do následujících let a přispěje k posílení důvěryhodnosti obchodní a rozvojové politiky EU.
Financial services contracts concluded at a distance (A9-0097/2023 - Arba Kokalari)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí návrhu Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění směrnice o smlouvách o finančních službách uzavřených na dálku. Schválený text zvyšuje ochranu spotřebitele a vytváří právní rámec pro finanční služby uzavírané online, telefonicky či prostřednictvím jiných forem dálkového marketingu. Díky revizi této směrnice budou mít spotřebitelé přístup k širší paletě finančních produktů a služeb přímo ze svých elektronických zařízení. V souvislosti s technologickým vývojem v odvětví se do budoucna počítá s tím, že působnost směrnice bude rozšiřována i o další služby a produkty. Jednou ze zásadních změn, kterou tento návrh přináší, je možnost uplatnit právo na odstoupení od smlouvy uzavřené na dálku pouhým kliknutím na tlačítko „odstoupit od smlouvy“, které poskytovatel finančních služeb musí integrovat do uživatelského rozhraní. Cílem je zvýšit povědomí spotřebitele o jeho právech a zároveň zajistit, aby uzavírání i vypovídání smluv podléhalo stejně flexibilním pravidlům. Zavedení této funkce se nebude týkat jen smluv o finančních službách uzavřených na dálku, ale i ostatních spotřebitelských smluv.
Schengen area: digitalisation of the visa procedure (A9-0025/2023 - Matjaž Nemec)
Podpořil jsem usnesení Evropského parlamentu o nařízení, které umožní digitalizaci postupu podávání a udělování víz pro vstup do schengenského prostoru. Toto nařízení zajistí, že proces udělování schengenských víz bude bezpečnější, jednodušší a méně cenově nákladný. Všechny žádosti o digitální schengenská víza budou zpracovávány prostřednictvím jednotné online platformy, na které budou žadatelé o vízum moci příslušným orgánům dodat veškeré potřebné informace a dokumenty, aniž by se museli osobně dostavit na některý ze zastupitelských úřadů. Cílem digitalizace postupu podávání a udělování víz je zvýšení bezpečnosti schengenského prostoru a zajištění efektivní vízové politiky EU.
Schengen area: amending the Visa Sticker Regulation (A9-0268/2023 - Matjaž Nemec)
Hlasoval jsem pro usnesení Evropského parlamentu o revizi nařízení o vízovém štítku, které nahrazuje stávající vízový štítek digitálním vízem. Nová digitální víza v podobě 2D čárového kódu budou obsahovat kryptografický podpis, který zajistí, že digitální víza nebudou tak snadno padělatelná či odcizitelná, jako je tomu v současnosti u fyzických vízových štítků. Nové bezpečnostní prvky spolu s digitalizací vízové politiky pomohou členským státům EU lépe čelit rizikům, která jsou spojena s nelegální migrací, a zároveň podpoří unijní cestovní ruch a podnikání.
The despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza (RC-B9-0436/2023, B9-0436/2023, B9-0438/2023, B9-0442/2023, B9-0444/2023, B9-0445/2023, B9-0447/2023, B9-0448/2023)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil usnesení Evropského parlamentu, které co nejdůrazněji odsuzuje teroristické útoky Hamásu a uznává právo Izraele na sebeobranu. Přijaté usnesení vyjadřuje podporu izraelskému lidu, vyzývá k okamžitému propuštění všech rukojmích unesených Hamásem a usiluje o prošetření role Íránu a dalších zemí, jako jsou například Katar či Rusko, pokud jde o financování a podporu terorismu v regionu. Součástí usnesení je i požadavek, aby byly íránské islámské revoluční gardy a libanonský Hizballáh zařazeny na unijní seznam teroristických organizací. S kolegy z Evropského parlamentu v usnesení dále zdůrazňujeme, že Hamás jakožto teroristickou organizaci v Palestině je třeba potlačit a vyjadřujeme znepokojení nad rostoucími projevy antisemitismu v Evropě. Z tohoto důvodu apelujeme na Komisi a členské státy, aby přijaly veškerá vhodná opatření k zajištění bezpečnosti příslušníků židovské obce.
Data Act (A9-0031/2023 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
Na plenárním zasedání v Bruselu jsem podpořil dohodu Rady a Evropského parlamentu o finální podobě textu nařízení o harmonizovaných pravidlech pro spravedlivý přístup k datům a jejich využívání neboli aktu o datech. Nařízení reaguje na současný rapidní nárůst objemu dat ve společnosti. Jeho cílem je podpořit konkurenceschopnost EU prostřednictvím sjednocení pravidel pro sdílení a přístup k údajům generovaným výrobky a využíváním služeb s těmito výrobky souvisejícími. Jedná se například o tzv. internet věcí či sdílení údajů mezi propojenými průmyslovými zařízeními. Díky jednotným pravidlům pro sdílení a přístup k těmto údajům dojde k optimalizaci stávajících obchodních modelů a procesů, podpoře dalšího rozvoje a inovací, mimo jiné v oblasti průmyslu či umělé inteligence, a v neposlední řadě i ke zlevnění některých poprodejních služeb, zejména oprav. Nová legislativa nezapomíná ani na problematiku nezákonného přeshraničního sdílení a úniků dat a specificky se věnuje ochraně obchodních tajemství.
European single access point (ESAP): access to information in relation to financial services, capital markets and sustainability (A9-0026/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem hlasoval pro změnu některých nařízení a směrnic upravujících zřízení a fungování jednotného evropského přístupového místa (dále jen „ESAP“). Balíček legislativních opatření ESAP vytvoří portál poskytující centralizovaný přístup k veřejně dostupným informacím o finančních službách, kapitálových trzích a udržitelnosti. ESAP poskytne jednotnou digitální platformu pro centralizované shromažďování, uchovávání a přístup k informacím zveřejněných v souladu se stávajícími unijními právními předpisy, jakož i k budoucím evropským směrnicím a nařízením, které budou s ESAP propojeny. Díky tomu se zajistí, že investoři, finanční analytici, zprostředkovatelé trhu a věřitelé budou mít centralizovaný přístup ke všem relevantním údajům. ESAP se tak stane užitečným nástrojem, který investorům a podnikům působících v EU pomůže orientovat se ve světě kapitálových trhů.
Settlement discipline, cross-border provision of services, supervisory cooperation, provision of banking-type ancillary services and requirements for third-country central securities depositories (A9-0047/2023 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
I supported the trilogue agreement on the refit of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation that, among others, aims to simplify passporting requirements, improve cooperation between national authorities and strengthen information and oversight on third-county central securities depositories.Beyond that, the revision of this regulation facilitates access to banking-type ancillary services and improves the settlement efficiency in the EU by introducing two-step approach of settlement discipline regime. This two-step approach consists of cash penalties and mandatory buy-ins, which are used as a last resort measure. It means that the Commission can trigger mandatory buy-ins and only if the cash penalty mechanism is not efficient and there is a negative effect on financial stability of the EU.This piece of legislation helps to strengthen EU’s economy and financial markets, promote financial stability, and enable capital flows across the Member States benefiting consumers, investors and companies.
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (A9-0298/2023 - Alexandr Vondra)
Euro 7 je návrh, který nepotřebujeme. To ostatně potvrzuje i fakt, že většina poslanců v EP se vyslovila pro zanechání aktuálně platných limitů emisí a metod jejich testování podle dosavadní normy Euro 6. Změny, které EP v návrhu Komise přináší, jdou sice správným směrem, ale v celkovém výsledku jsou nedostatečné. Hlasování o Euro 7 byla vhodná příležitost pro nápravu nešťastné situace kolem spalovacích motorů, například tím, že by se zavedla nová kategorie vozidel se spalovacími motory na alternativní paliva. K tomu ale bohužel nedošlo. Tato paliva totiž mohou přispět ke snížení emisí a umožnit tak další využívání technologie spalovacích motorů. Navíc jsou naprosto zásadní z hlediska zachování principu technologické neutrality. Za problematické považuji také zachování požadavku na bezdrátovou komunikaci dat z vozidel. Ta povede ke zvýšení nákladů, a tím cen pro spotřebitele, zejména u malých osobních aut, a přinese také riziko kybernetických útoků a možného zneužití dat.
High common level of cybersecurity at the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union (A9-0064/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
Podpořil jsem návrh na nastavení jednotných bezpečnostních pravidel a systémů pro administrativu Evropské unie. Tato pravidla by měla zamezit vzrůstajícímu množství kybernetických útoků a snížit počet kybernetických hrozeb, kterým evropské instituce a agentury čelí. Tento návrh sjednotí standardy, které se v jednotlivých institucích, orgánech a agenturách prozatím různí, díky čemuž se zaručí posílení celkové stability a obranyschopnosti celého systému. Bezpečná a odolná digitální veřejná správa je klíčovým prvkem transformace, aby se evropské instituce přizpůsobily digitálnímu věku.
Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehicles (A9-0313/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
Po zákazu spalovacích motorů pro osobní auta, po EURO 7 je zpřísnění výkonnostních norem pro emise CO2 pro nová těžká vozidla další kritická regulace, která zatěžuje automobilový průmysl v Evropě, povede ke zvýšení nákladů, a tím cen pro spotřebitele. Návrh omezuje nebo pomíjí dostupná řešení a nerespektuje technologickou neutralitu. Návrh jsem nepodpořil, neboť postrádá začlenění alternativních, CO2 neutrálních paliv, ať už jsou syntetického nebo biologického původu. Bez jejich absence reálně hrozí, že silniční přeprava v jakékoliv podobě přestane být dostupnou. Dalším problémem, kvůli kterému jsem návrh nepodpořil, je úplný zákaz jiných než zcela bezemisních autobusů v městské dopravě po roce 2030. To zkomplikuje rozvoj hromadné dopravy a výrazně ji zdraží, nebo může dojít k tomu, že nebude jezdit vůbec.
EU/New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (A9-0305/2023 - Daniel Caspary)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil ratifikaci dohody o volném obchodu mezi EU a Novým Zélandem. Nový Zéland sice není naším největším obchodním partnerem, ale v současné situaci je strategickým a podobně orientovaným partnerem v geopolitickém kontextu. Ve světle agresivní politiky Ruska a expanzivní politiky Číny musí Evropa posilovat svá partnerství s podobně smýšlejícími demokraciemi, jako je právě Nový Zéland. Pevně věřím, že tato dohoda prohloubí spolupráci mezi EU a Novým Zélandem nejen v geopolitických otázkách, ale také v otázkách udržitelnosti.
VAT: rules for the digital age (A9-0327/2023 - Olivier Chastel)
Během plenárního zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem se vyslovil proti směrnici DPH pro digitální věk. Tato směrnice zavádí e-fakturaci pro přeshraniční transakce, což by pro Českou republiku znamenalo opuštění kontrolního hlášení a přechod na e-faktury i pro domácí transakce. Následkem toho by česká daňová správa musela reagovat na zvýšenou administrativní zátěž. Dalším dopadem je ohrožení boje proti daňovým únikům, které by taková změna přinesla.
Digitalisation and Administrative Law (A9-0309/2023 - Karen Melchior)
Podpořil jsem přijetí zprávy obsahující doporučení Komisi o digitalizaci a správním právu. Evropský parlament v přijaté zprávě vyzývá Komisi, aby co nejdříve předložila legislativní návrh nařízení o otevřené, efektivní a nezávislé správě Evropské unie a dále náležitým způsobem zohlednila dopad digitalizace na toto právní odvětví. Neexistující soubor kodifikovaných pravidel unijního správního práva oslabuje důvěru občanů ve správu Unie, což snižuje legitimitu celé EU. Kodifikace a digitalizace evropského správního práva procesního by proto mohla přispět ke sbližování vnitrostátního správního práva jednotlivých členských států, a tím pádem k účinnému prosazování obecných procesních zásad a základních práv občanů napříč EU.
Negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by Frontex in Mauritania (A9-0358/2023 - Tineke Strik)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy Evropského parlamentu k probíhajícím jednáním o dohodě o postavení jednotek, pokud jde o operativní činnosti agentury Frontex v Mauritánii. Význam Mauritánie jako tranzitní země pro migranty a žadatele o azyl ze zemí subsaharské Afriky v poslední době roste. Země se však momentálně potýká s řadou výzev v oblasti správy hranic, což zvyšuje riziko nelegální migrace do Evropy. Považuji proto za nezbytné, aby EU posilovala spolupráci se třetími zeměmi, jako je právě Mauritánie. Přijetí statusové dohody mezi EU a Mauritánií poprvé v historii zmocní agenturu Frontex vykonávat činnost na území třetího státu, který nemá společnou hranici s některým z členských států EU, ani se nenachází na evropském kontinentu.
Digitalisation of cross-border judicial cooperation (A9-0062/2023 - Emil Radev, Marina Kaljurand)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil dohodu z trialogu o nařízení a revizi směrnice o digitalizaci justiční spolupráce a přístupu ke spravedlnosti v přeshraničních občanských, obchodních a trestních věcech. Cílem této legislativy je nejenom zvýšit účinnost a odolnost přeshraniční justiční spolupráce v EU prostřednictvím digitalizace přeshraniční komunikace v občanských (včetně rodinných), obchodních a trestních věcech, ale i usnadnit přístup unijním občanům ke spravedlnosti. Nově tak bude možné komunikovat se soudy a dalšími justičními orgány členských států elektronicky, platit elektronicky soudní poplatky nebo konat hlavní líčení a jiná ústní jednání prostřednictvím videokonferencí. Výsledný text této dohody obsahuje mimo jiné i posílené záruky procesní ochrany pro fyzické a právnické osoby pobývající či sídlící na území některého z členských států EU.
Strategic Compass and EU space-based defence capabilities (A9-0334/2023 - Arnaud Danjean)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy Evropského parlamentu k návrhu Strategického kompasu a vesmírných obranných schopností EU. Tento dokument definuje vesmír jako strategický prostor, kde je nutné brát ohled na politické, vojenské, ekonomické a bezpečnostní zájmy Evropské unie. Dokument dále definuje, klasifikuje a rozřazuje jednotlivé hrozby, které se k tomuto prostoru váží. Návrh zavádí harmonizované bezpečnostní právní předpisy v oblasti vesmíru. Dále žádá navýšení konkurenceschopnosti, investic a tvorbu funkčních průmyslových politik, které budou podpořeny pružným a pohotovým řízením. V neposlední řadě dokument potvrzuje důležité postavení Evropské kosmické agentury a trvá na dalším pokračování družicových projektů, které tato agentura zajišťuje.
Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (A9-0331/2023 - Seán Kelly, Andreas Schieder)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil zprávu o implementaci dohody o obchodu a spolupráci mezi Evropskou unií a Spojeným královstvím, která platí od ledna 2021. Evropský parlament v této zprávě hodnotí, jak probíhá provádění dohody o obchodu a spolupráci. Na tvorbě této zprávy se podílely všechny výbory EP a dosáhly velmi uspokojivého kompromisu. Zpráva poukazuje na hlavní problémy při provádění dohody o obchodu a spolupráci, na uspokojivé aspekty a na oblasti, kde by bylo žádoucí dosáhnout většího pokroku a úsilí. Zdůrazňuje také obavy EP týkající se nových právních předpisů ve Spojeném království, které se odchylují od základních práv a evropských předpisů.
European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law Making covering 2020, 2021 and 2022 (A9-0310/2023 - Catharina Rinzema)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy o účelnosti, subsidiaritě a proporcionalitě právních předpisů Evropské unie a o zdokonalení právních předpisů za roky 2020, 2021 a 2022. Tuto zprávu vydává každoročně Komise a jejím cílem je zhodnotit, do jaké míry jsou při tvorbě a provádění legislativy uplatňovány základní zásady fungování EU ze strany unijních institucí a jejich orgánů, konkrétně principy subsidiarity a proporcionality. Z přijaté zprávy vyplývá, že EU by při tvorbě právních předpisů měla lépe zohlednit pozice národních, případně regionálních parlamentů a dále důsledněji aplikovat „SME test“ spolu s „prověrkou konkurenceschopnosti“. Jinak řečeno, EU by měla vždy posoudit dopad nových pravidel na činnost a fungování malých a středních podniků (dále jen „SME“), protože právě ony jsou páteří naší unijní ekonomiky. Z tohoto důvodu považuji za klíčové, abychom tvořily evropskou legislativu, která činnost SME bude podporovat, nikoliv omezovat.
Foodstuffs for human consumption: amending certain 'Breakfast' Directives (A9-0385/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber)
Podpořil jsem zprávu Evropského parlamentu k revizi tzv. snídaňových směrnic. Tato revize má za cíl harmonizovat obchodní normy tak, aby se unijní spotřebitelé mohli při nákupu některých zemědělsko-potravinářských výrobků rozhodovat informovaněji a zdravěji. Revidované „snídaňové směrnice“ upravují pravidla pro transparentní a přesnější označování původu a složení ovocných šťáv, džemů a medu. Návrh mimo jiné reaguje na četné podvody s dováženým medem, kdy namísto medu výrobky obsahovaly cukerné sirupy. Z tohoto důvodu Evropský parlament navrhl změnu v systému informování o původu těchto výrobků, která spočívá v tom, že pokud med nebo ovoce použité do ovocných šťáv či džemů pochází z více než jedné země, musí být země původu uvedeny na etiketě v sestupném pořadí dle jejich podílu na celkové hmotnosti daného výrobku. Toto pravidlo se však nebude týkat včelařů na území EU, kteří mají méně než 150 včelstev. Cílem tohoto návrhu je tak podpořit udržitelnost unijních potravinových systémů v souladu se strategií „od zemědělce ke spotřebiteli“.
Minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector (A9-0370/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
Podpořil jsem návrh na stanovení minimálních požadavků na přestávky a odpočinek řidičů autobusů v příležitostné přepravě cestujících. Považuji ho za krok správným směrem k zajištění spravedlivějších pracovních podmínek v tomto odvětví a také k odlišení od pravidel uplatňovaných na řidiče nákladních vozidel. Tyto požadavky reflektují specifika odvětví s ohledem na sezónní práci a variabilitu vzdáleností řízení v závislosti na přepravě cestujících. Podporuji flexibilitu v rozdělování přestávek, odkládání denních odpočinkových období a harmonizaci týdenních odpočinkových pravidel dle potřeb služeb, což považuji za klíčové pro zlepšení pracovních podmínek řidičů.
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (A9-0260/2023 - Nicola Beer)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy Evropského parlamentu k nařízení, kterým se stanoví rámec pro zajištění bezpečných a udržitelných dodávek kritických surovin. Cílem nařízení je snížit závislost EU na dodávkách kritických nerostných surovin ze zemí s autoritářskými režimy, zefektivnit postupy získávání a využívání kritických nerostných surovin a v neposlední řadě diverzifikovat unijní dodavatelské řetězce. Je to snaha především o to, aby byl adekvátně podpořen výzkum a inovace v této oblasti, snížila se byrokratická zátěž pro malé a střední podniky, vytvořily dostatečné investiční pobídky a zároveň přispělo k navazování nových strategických obchodních partnerství s demokratickými státy.
Small modular reactors (A9-0408/2023 - Franc Bogovič)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy o malých modulárních reaktorech, ve které Evropský parlament vyzývá EU k vypracování strategie pro větší zapojení malých modulárních reaktorů v oblasti jaderné energetiky. Malé modulární reaktory (dále jen „SMRs“) mají sice oproti tradičním reaktorům nukleárních elektráren menší výkon, ale jsou považovány za bezpečnější, účinnější a méně nákladné. SMRs nabízí široké využití, a to od výroby elektřiny, průmyslového tepla až po odsolování vody. Navíc je jejich integrace do stávající energetické infrastruktury snazší než v případě tradičních jaderných reaktorů. Zpráva Evropského parlamentu zohledňuje potřeby regionů a jednotlivých sektorů ekonomiky a stanovuje konkrétní pokyny pro plánování výstavby SMRs, udělování licencí a pro regulaci jejich bezpečného provozu. Jedná se o první „pronukleární“ akt Evropského parlamentu za stávajícího mandátu, který jadernou energii považuje za cenově dostupnou, spolehlivou a čistou formu energie. Evropská unie momentálně drží technologické prvenství na světovém trhu SMRs, a tento potenciál je, dle mého názoru, nutné rozvíjet i v budoucnu, a to pro dosažení energetické soběstačnosti a konkurenceschopnosti EU.
Reshaping the future framework of EU structural funds to support regions particularly affected by challenges related to the automotive, green and digital transitions (A9-0326/2023 - Susana Solís Pérez)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy Evropského parlamentu o přetvoření budoucího rámce strukturálních fondů EU na podporu regionů zvláště postižených výzvami spojenými s transformací automobilového průmyslu a s ekologickou a digitální transformací. EU se v současnosti musí vypořádat s řadou výzev, které jsou spojené především se změnou klimatu, digitalizací a diverzifikací ekonomiky. Cílem této zprávy je tak podpořit hospodářskou, sociální a územní soudržnost napříč evropskými regiony, a to zejména v oblastech, které jsou do větší míry postiženy dopady výše uvedených transformací. V souvislosti s unijním automobilovým průmyslem zpráva dále apeluje na dodržování mechanismu spravedlivé transformace, finanční podporu malých a středních podniků pro přechod na nové nízkoemisní technologie či podporu výzkumu, vývoje a inovací v této oblasti. V neposlední řadě zpráva také poukazuje na nutnost přijetí zvláštních podpůrných opatření pro regiony, v nichž má tradiční automobilový průmysl vysoký podíl na HDP a na zaměstnanosti. Ve zprávě tedy explicitně zaznívá, že podpora automobilového průmyslu je pro zajištění sociálního blahobytu, udržitelného hospodářského růstu a globální konkurenceschopnosti EU klíčová.
Objection to a delegated act pursuant to Rule 111(3): Adjustments of the size criteria for micro, small, medium-sized and large undertakings or groups (B9-0493/2023)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil námitku Evropského parlamentu vůči aktu Komise v přenesené pravomoci podle čl. 111 odst. 3 jednacího řádu k úpravám kritérií velikosti pro mikropodniky a malé, střední a velké podniky nebo skupiny. Delegovaný akt Komise upravil účetní směrnici, která v souvislosti s velikostí podniků zohledňuje dvě hlavní kritéria – počet zaměstnanců a peněžní kritérium spočívající v ročním obratu a účetní rozvaze. Dle účetní směrnice je za velký podnik považován podnik, který má více než 250 zaměstnanců, čistý obrat přes 40 milionů eur ročně a roční bilanční sumu v hodnotě vyšší než 20 milionů eur. Návrh Komise zvýšil hranici ročního čistého obratu pro velké podniky a skupiny ze 40 na 50 milionů eur, avšak počet zaměstnanců zůstal beze změny. Jsem proto toho názoru, že návrh Komise měl být daleko razantnější. Pokud je cílem EU snížit byrokratickou zátěž pro malé a střední podniky, mělo se v návrhu Komise objevit i zvýšení hranice minimálního počtu zaměstnanců. Díky tomu by jednotlivé malé a střední podniky mohly zaměstnávat daleko více osob a zároveň profitovat z pravidel týkajících se reportingu pro MSP.
EU-Japan relations (A9-0373/2023 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí návrhu zprávy o vztazích mezi EU a Japonskem z několika důvodů. Prvním aspektem je zdůraznění partnerství mezi EU a Japonskem postaveného na sdílených hodnotách a společných cílech. Tato dohoda reflektuje naše společné úsilí o digitální partnerství a posilování ekonomické bezpečnosti. Oceňuji Japonsko jako klíčového aktéra v regionální stabilitě, včetně jeho účasti v několika fórech a platformách pro dialog v indicko-tichomořském regionu, jako je například Východoasijský summit, a snahy o partnerství v oblasti rozvojové spolupráce v indicko-tichomořském regionu. Podpořil jsem také postoj vůči geopolitickým výzvám, jako je situace v Číně a Severní Koreji, a důležitost spolupráce v oblasti kybernetické bezpečnosti či ochrany lidských práv. Celkově jsem přesvědčen, že tato dohoda posiluje naši spolupráci s Japonskem a přináší konkrétní výhody pro občany EU. Věřím, že společné úsilí obou stran o globální stabilitu a prosperitu je klíčové pro budoucnost mezinárodní spolupráce a bezpečnosti.
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme 2021-2027 (A9-0425/2023 - Massimiliano Smeriglio)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí zprávy Evropského parlamentu o provádění programu Kreativní Evropa na období 2021–2027. Mezi hlavní cíle programu patří mimo jiné ochrana, rozvoj a podpora evropské kulturní a jazykové rozmanitosti a kulturního dědictví a dále také zvyšování konkurenceschopnosti a ekonomického potenciálu kulturních a kreativních odvětví, zejména v oblasti audiovize. Projekty financované z programu Kreativní Evropa prohlubují uměleckou, kulturní a mezioborovou spolupráci na evropské úrovni, podporují tvorbu evropských děl, napomáhají inovacím a mobilitě a v neposlední řadě se také zasazují o nezávislé a pluralitní mediální prostředí, včetně zvyšování mediální gramotnosti napříč členskými státy EU.
Implementation of territorial development (CPR, Title III, Chapter II) and its application in the European Territorial agenda 2030 (A9-0420/2023 - Marcos Ros Sempere)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem podpořil zprávu Evropského parlamentu o provádění územního rozvoje (nařízení o společných ustanoveních, hlava III, kapitola II) a jeho uplatňování v Územní agendě Evropské unie 2030. Územní agenda 2030 představuje strategický rámec pro konkrétní aktivity na podporu územní soudržnosti v Evropě, a to jak na úrovni regionálních, tak národních či evropských politik. Dále se Územní agenda 2030 zasazuje o to, aby byl územní rozměr sektorových politik řádně zohledňován na všech úrovních správy. Cílem této iniciativy je zejména podpořit udržitelný rozvoj napříč evropskými regiony, a tím dosáhnout cílů spravedlivé transformace EU.
Cultural diversity and the conditions for authors in the European music streaming market (A9-0388/2023 - Ibán García Del Blanco)
Podpořil jsem usnesení Evropského parlamentu o kulturní rozmanitosti a podmínkách pro autory na evropském trhu streamování hudby. Tímto usnesením Evropský parlament vyzývá k tomu, aby byla v EU zavedena pravidla, která zajistí spravedlivé odměňování umělců, transparentní algoritmy streamovacích platforem, udržitelnost sektoru streamování hudby a dále podpoří kulturní rozmanitost v tomto odvětví. Usnesení reaguje na současnou situaci, kdy z důvodu neexistujících unijních pravidel dochází k tomu, že jsou autoři a interpreti působící na streamovacích platformách nedostatečně odměňováni. Evropský parlament proto požaduje, aby nová právní úprava zavazovala streamovací platformy k používání transparentních algoritmů a systémů pro doručování obsahu. To zamezí nekalým praktikám, jako je například manipulace s údaji o streamování za účelem snížení odměny vyplácené umělcům, kterých se streamovací platformy často dopouští.
Building a comprehensive European port strategy (A9-0443/2023 - Tom Berendsen)
Jeden z hlavních bodů evropské strategie přístavů by měl podle zprávy spočívat v rostoucích investicích do evropských přístavů ze strany třetích zemí, například ze strany Číny, což může mít závažné důsledky pro bezpečnost a ekonomickou nezávislost sektoru a také celé Evropské unie. Evropská komise by měla přijmout komplexní strategii, která zajistí konkurenceschopnost a odolnost evropských přístavů, zároveň ale předejde nežádoucímu vlivu ze strany třetích zemí na kritickou infrastrukturu. Je klíčové posílit ekonomickou pozici přístavů EU a zlepšit jejich konkurenceschopnost na globální úrovni. Tato podpora představuje opatření pro zachování suverenity a bezpečnosti EU v oblasti přístavů.
Implementation of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (A9-0400/2023 - Javier Moreno Sánchez)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem vyjádřil svou podporu zprávě Evropského parlamentu týkající se provádění Komplexní hospodářské a obchodní dohody (CETA) mezi Evropskou unií a Kanadou. Dohoda CETA hraje klíčovou roli v podpoře ekonomického růstu, zejména skrze vytváření nových pracovních míst prostřednictvím zvýšeného vývozu. Od roku 2017 je možné sledovat nárůst obchodu v oblasti zboží a služeb mezi oběma stranami. Dohoda také efektivně podporuje mobilitu pracovních sil a zároveň zdůrazňuje význam těžebního a důlního průmyslu pro ekonomiku Evropské unie. Zpráva rovněž přináší návrhy na posílení účasti evropských podniků v kanadských výběrových řízeních. Tímto způsobem se nabízí příležitosti pro malé a střední podniky k rozšíření jejich působení. Dále zpráva zdůrazňuje potřebu vylepšit ochranu zeměpisných označení pro držitele práv EU v Kanadě.
Policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company, commercial and intellectual property law issues (A9-0442/2023 - Axel Voss, Ibán García Del Blanco)
Hlasoval jsem pro tuto zprávu z několika důvodů. Považuji za klíčové, že i přesto, že zpráva neobsahuje explicitní definice termínů „metaverse„ a „virtuální svět“, klade důraz na standardizaci a interoperabilitu pro rozvoj propojených virtuálních světů. Tato iniciativa je klíčová pro posílení digitální ekonomiky a ochranu práv uživatelů. Důležitým aspektem je také zdůraznění etických hodnot a respektování legislativy v rámci virtuálních světů v EU. Upřednostňuji přístup, který klade důraz na monitorování souladu a vymáhání pravidel odpovědnosti. Podporuji také názor, že teritoriální principy pro virtuální světy mohou být problematické a je třeba pečlivě posoudit ustanovení mezinárodního práva v této oblasti. Důraz na anonymitu uživatelů v případech, kde není vyžadována identifikace, přispívá k ochraně soukromí.
Virtual worlds – opportunities, risks and policy implications for the single market (A9-0397/2023 - Pablo Arias Echeverría)
I supported the report on Virtual Worlds as I believe it sets a good outline for how we should proceed as regards the development of virtual worlds within the EU. We have seen the development of the Metaverse and Virtual Worlds in recent years and the Commission adopted a Communication on Virtual Worlds in July 2023. In my view these worlds should be monitored, and we must ensure that they act in line with existing EU legislation. I agree that now is not the time to directly regulate virtual worlds, as we do not have sufficient evidence and data points on the main elements which may be of concern to citizens. We have a number of cross-sector pieces of legislation such as the Data Act, AI Act, as well as the Digital Markets and Digital Service Acts, for example, which can serve as an initial base to monitor if and how virtual worlds would need any further specific legislation.It is also important that we have good coordination between different authorities and stakeholders in order to effectively monitor the development of virtual worlds as we go forward.
EU-India relations (A9-0435/2023 - Alviina Alametsä)
Podpořil jsem znění doporučení týkajícího se vztahů mezi EU a Indií. Zpráva podporuje pokračování dialogů na různých úrovních se zvláštním důrazem na oblasti, jako je změna klimatu, digitalizace, výzkum, obchod a lidská práva. Dále doporučení zdůrazňuje význam provádění stávajících strategií, stanovení jasných kritérií pokroku a přípravy na komplexní partnerství. V textu je přikládán značný význam otázkám lidských práv či ochraně životního prostředí. Vyzývá k pololetním dialogům o lidských právech, dohodám o volném obchodu, které zahrnují hodnocení lidských práv, a k zajištění souladu obchodních a investičních aktivit.
Geothermal energy (A9-0432/2023 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
Na plenárním zasedání ve Štrasburku jsem hlasoval pro zprávu Evropského parlamentu o geotermální energii, která vyzývá k vytvoření strategie pro urychlení zavádění geotermální energie v EU a pro podporu investic do tohoto sektoru energetiky. Kromě evropské strategie Evropský parlament dále vyzývá členské státy k přijetí národních strategií pro geotermální energii po vzoru Francie, Polska či Irska. Geotermální energie má oproti většině obnovitelných zdrojů energie tu výhodu, že dokáže poskytovat stabilní dodávky energie. Navíc k výrobě a provozu geotermálních zařízení nejsou zapotřebí kritické suroviny, kterých je v EU nedostatek. V neposlední řadě zpráva zohledňuje postavení evropských regionů, které jsou ekonomicky závislé na fosilních zdrojích, a vyzývá k jejich podpoře při přechodu na čisté zdroje energie, jako je právě geotermální energie.
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (A9-0311/2023 - Anna Zalewska)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí revize směrnice o elektroodpadech. Ta mimo jiné definuje odpovědnost výrobců a řeší problémy spojené například s fotovoltaickými panely. Cílem je dosáhnout revize směrnice do roku 2026, aby se členské státy EU mohly účinně vypořádat s nárůstem odpadů pocházejících z elektrických a elektronických zařízení, jako jsou mobilní telefony, počítače, televize, lednice a nově i fotovoltaické panely. Evropský parlament vyzval Komisi, aby revize této směrnice byla v souladu s unijními standardy.
Measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act) (A9-0254/2023 - Ivars Ijabs)
Podpořil jsem akt o Interoperabilní Evropě, protože navrhovaná legislativa přináší několik klíčových bodů, které by mohly mít pozitivní dopad na unijní občany a podniky. Mezi ně patří například efektivnější výměna informací mezi orgány veřejné správy napříč členskými státy EU či podpora digitalizace veřejného sektoru. Akt o Interoperabilní Evropě má za cíl snížit administrativní zátěž pro orgány veřejné správy, zejména na komunální či regionální úrovni, zpřístupnit služby veřejné správy všem občanům EU a v neposlední řadě bere v potaz i specifické požadavky malých a středních podniků. Tento legislativní návrh představuje krok vpřed směrem k vytvoření moderní a interoperabilní digitální infrastruktury v Evropské unii.
Amendments to the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and to the Directive relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITSD) (A9-0020/2023 - Isabel Benjumea Benjumea)
I supported the outcome of the interinstitutional negotiations to update the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive.The principal aims of the update were to close some loopholes that have appeared through the evolution of the financial landscape and new innovations in the markets. In addition, the changes also aim to move towards greater harmonisation in the application of the Directive by Member State competent authorities and in particular as regards the question of supervision.I believe that as the markets evolve, especially considering new methods of settlement, trading and the evolution of the use of technology, we need to ensure that our existing legislation is sufficiently broad to allow for and encourage such evolution. That is a key reason why I am a proponent of principles-based legislation when it comes to financial services in the EU.
Instant payments in euro (A9-0230/2023 - Michiel Hoogeveen)
I supported the new Instant Payments Regulation.In a world where speed is more and more of the essence, particularly when it comes to finance and real-time transactions, instant payments can bring many benefits to consumers, for example in transferring money from their accounts at short notice to pay for necessary goods or services. This regulation aims to accelerate the use of instant payments in euros across Europe.I do fear that it may be difficult for those countries that don’t use the Euro to be fully ready to implement this regulation, as it will imply some upheaval within their current management of payments. Nevertheless, overall, the regulation is a step in the right direction for quick and seamless transfers in euros.I am also pleased to see that we have finally updated the Settlement Finality Directive as part of this process. It is evident that this is long overdue, and now a much broader range of payment service providers will be able to access settlement directly and not have to rely on intermediary banks. This will help promote competition in the internal market by also including, for example, new FinTechs into the scope of the directive.
Establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’) (A9-0290/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Christian Ehler)
Hlasoval jsem pro novou legislativu o strategických technologiích pro Evropu (STEP) reagující na potřebu posílení investic do kritických technologií v Evropě. Cílem STEP je podpořit evropské společnosti v jejich dalším růstu a rozvoji. V tomto pohledu jej považuji za krok směrem k posílení konkurenceschopnosti celé evropské ekonomiky a přechodu na digitální a moderní ekonomiku.
Shipments of waste (A9-0290/2022 - Pernille Weiss)
Podpořil jsem nová pravidla pro potírání nelegální přepravy odpadů. Zavádějí mechanismy, které usnadňují recyklaci a opětovné efektivní využití odpadů v rámci EU. Dále bude pečlivě sledován vývoz odpadů do zemí OECD a bude možné pozastavit vývoz, pokud by hrozilo riziko ohrožení životního prostředí nebo zdraví bez zajištění udržitelného zpracování. V zájmu boje proti nelegální přepravě odpadů a snížení trestné činnosti proti životnímu prostředí EU podpoří vyšetřování nadnárodního obchodu s odpady, zřídí skupinu pro prosazování přepravy odpadů a zpřísní sankce za nelegální přepravu.
Certain aspects of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (A9-0344/2023 - Jonás Fernández)
Podpořil jsem výsledek meziinstitucionálních jednání o návrhu využití řetězové vlastnické struktury (dále jen „daisy chain“), který upravuje evropskou bankovní regulaci, konkrétně směrnici o ozdravných postupech a řešení krize bank a nařízení o jednotném mechanismu pro řešení krizí, které stanovují bankám minimální požadavek na kapitál a způsobilé závazky (MREL) pro zajištění stability v případě krize. Daisy chain se věnuje MREL z pohledu struktury bankovní skupiny a zavádí tzv. interní MREL, který by měl omezit negativní dopad původního znění na dceřiné společnosti, které již nebudou nuceny odečítat investice v rámci skupiny. Používání interního MREL je podmíněno povolením příslušného regulatorního orgánu a legislativa zároveň zavádí i zvláštní pravidla pro subjekty v likvidaci, na která se opatření k řešení krize doposud nevztahovala.
Driving licences (A9-0445/2023 - Karima Delli)
Návrh o řidičských průkazech jsem nepodpořil z několika důvodů. Jedním z hlavních je úprava lékařských prohlídek a dalších testů způsobilosti řidiče, ty považuji za nevyvážené, uvítal bych, kdyby si je mohly stanovit samy členské státy v souladu se svými zdravotními a dalšími předpisy. Naopak vítám snížení věkové hranice u řidičů pro některá vozidla, jedná se o příležitost k pobídce mladých řidičů, k obsazení chybějících míst řidičů autobusů, autokarů a nákladních vozidel.
Standard essential patents (A9-0016/2024 - Marion Walsmann)
Podpořil jsem návrh nařízení o udělování licencí k základním standardním patentům, díky kterému by mělo dojít ke zlepšení licenčních postupů a k zachování konkurenceschopnosti a inovační kapacity evropské ekonomiky. Základními standardními patenty jsou takové, které zabezpečují klíčovou technologii a nemohou být nahrazeny. Díky zvýšení transparentnosti a lepší informovanosti na poli licencování standardizovaných technologií budou společnosti, včetně malých a středních podniků, schopny přinášet více inovativních řešení a zvýšit tak konkurenceschopnost Evropy.
Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (A9-0007/2024 - Herbert Dorfmann)
Zdržel jsem se hlasování o návrhu rychlejší a spolehlivější úlevy z nadměrných daní (FASTER), která si klade za cíl zavedení jednotného režimu pro vrácení srážkové daně naskrz členskými státy EU. Evropská komise přichází s tímto návrhem v reakci na řadu daňových podvodů a skandálů na území EU za posledních 5 let. Česká republika se díky dobře nastavenému daňovému systému na národní úrovni nepotýká s problémy, které má návrh řešit, a byla by tímto návrhem nucena nákladně měnit již dobře fungující pravidla.
Data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services (A9-0270/2023 - Kim Van Sparrentak)
Hlasoval jsem pro podporu nových pravidel pro krátkodobé pronájmy s ohledem na zlepšení ochrany spotřebitelů a zvýšení transparentnosti v této oblasti. Nová opatření, která zahrnují lepší sledování a sdílení dat o pronájmech, nejen usnadní identifikaci legálních hostitelů a sníží riziko nelegálních nabídek, ale také nastaví rovné podmínky pro všechny poskytovatele ubytování. Očekává se, že tato pravidla sníží administrativní zátěž pro platformy a hostitele, což přispěje k efektivnějšímu fungování celého systému krátkodobých pronájmů ubytování v EU.
Improving the Union’s protection against market manipulation on the wholesale energy market (A9-0261/2023 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
Na plenárním zasedání jsem podpořil nařízení proti manipulaci na velkoobchodním trhu s energiemi. Cílem je stabilizovat ceny na velkoobchodních trzích, usnadnit vstup novým společnostem a zajistit rovné podmínky pro všechny účastníky. Důraz na rozlišení pravidel pro finanční a energetický trh zachovaný ve finálním znění podporuje efektivní fungování obou trhů a prospívá koncovému spotřebiteli snížením nákladů způsobených komplexní legislativou. Podstatnou součástí jsou opatření proti tržním manipulacím a klamavému jednání, což má zabránit ilegálním praktikám a posílit ochranu spotřebitelů. Zásadní je posílený dohled nad obchodníky, který má zaručit dodržování pravidel, a zajistit tak vyšší ochranu pro koncového spotřebitele.
Weights and dimensions of certain road vehicles (A9-0047/2024 - Isabel García Muñoz)
Návrh reviduje aktuální pravidla umožňující zvýšení hmotnosti vozidel využívajících technologie s nulovými emisemi. Rozhodl jsem se zdržet hlasování, neboť mám několik výhrad k tomuto návrhu. Navrhované změny spočívají v zefektivnění nákladní silniční dopravy v jednotlivých členských státech, a z podstaty tak návrh není dostatečně motivující pro větší využívání intermodální dopravy v nákladní dopravě.
Use of railway infrastructure capacity in the single European railway area, amending Directive 2012/34/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 (A9-0069/2024 - Tilly Metz)
Podpořil jsem návrh, který stanovuje pravidla pro správu kapacity železniční infrastruktury s cílem optimalizovat využití sítě, zlepšit kvalitu služeb a zvýšit objem dopravy v rámci jednotného evropského železničního prostoru. Návrh se kromě jiného zaměřuje na koordinaci správců železniční infrastruktury, dohled nad kapacitami a řízení dopravy, zvládání krizových situací, zlepšení výkonnosti a zavádění digitálních nástrojů pro jejich správu. Dopravcům by tak měla být přínosná digitalizace sektoru prostřednictvím jednotného rozhraní pro plánování tras. Zvýšená flexibilita přidělování některých tras by měla podpořit rozvoj železniční dopravy, a to jak osobní, tak nákladní, zejména tam, kde je poptávka proměnlivá v čase. Tuto iniciativu vítám, neboť rozvoj a podpora železnice představuje nezbytný krok směrem k udržitelnějšímu a efektivnějšímu dopravnímu systému, který přispívá snižování dopravní zátěže na silnicích.
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (A9-0033/2023 - Ciarán Cuffe)
Dojednané znění je dle mého názoru příliš ambiciózní, a proto jsem je nepodpořil. Stanovuje striktní cíle v krátkém čase, bez ohledu na finanční možnosti různých majitelů a provozovatelů budov a bez ohledu na možné sociální dopady. Požadavky obsažené ve směrnici povedou ke zdražení nové výstavby, ale také výraznějších renovací, povedou k vyšším cenám nemovitostí i nájmů. Směrnice je dalším příkladem nepromyšlené zelené politiky. Všichni chceme, aby budovy, které využíváme, měly nízkou energetickou spotřebu. Na druhou stranu, každá úprava něco stojí a veřejné peníze na to stačit nebudou. Stručný výčet požadavků jako omezení kotlů na fosilní paliva, příprava pro solární panely či povinná dobíjecí místa pro elektromobily a elektrokola se dotkne kancelářských budov i budov na bydlení, ale také se to dotkne měst a obcí. Financování veřejných budov jako tělocvičen, škol či knihoven, které mají naplnit striktně bezemisní cíl, je podle mého názoru aktuálně nereálný.
Artificial Intelligence Act (A9-0188/2023 - Brando Benifei, Dragoş Tudorache)
Podpořil jsem Akt o umělé inteligenci na plenárním zasedání. Dohoda znamená vytvoření rámce, ve kterém se bude moci umělá inteligence v Evropě dále rozvíjet. Zároveň ale nařízení jasně vymezuje pravidla s cílem chránit osobní svobody a demokratické principy. Akt rozděluje systémy AI do kategorií podle úrovně rizika a podle toho stanoví konkrétní povinnosti. Dále zakazuje systémy, jež kategorizují lidi podle citlivých údajů, a vyžaduje, aby systémy s vysokým rizikem splňovaly specifické požadavky. Nařízení se také zabývá obecnými systémy umělé inteligence a požaduje transparentnost, posouzení rizik a dodržování přísných norem EU. V zájmu podpory inovací a malých podniků dohoda podporuje regulační sandboxy pro bezpečné testování technologií AI.
Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes (A9-0060/2024 - Laura Ballarín Cereza)
Podpořil jsem návrh revize dosavadní směrnice o alternativním řešení sporů (ADR) a zrušení online řešení spotřebitelských sporů (ODR). Namísto ODR bude uveden do života nový digitální nástroj, který umožní spotřebitelům řešit jejich stížnosti. Hlavním cílem tohoto návrhu je zlepšit přístup k ADR v případech přeshraničních sporů díky využití digitálních nástrojů a rozšířit jeho působnost na všechny druhy sporů týkajících se práv spotřebitele v rámci EU. Směrnice zjednoduší postupy ADR pro všechny zúčastněné strany, včetně snížení administrativní zátěže stran ADR a informačních povinností obchodníků. Díky novému nástroji budou pro spotřebitele informace o možnostech řešení jejich sporů transparentnější, což nabídne efektivní právní ochranu. Směrnice obsahuje i další důležité změny, jako je povinnost obchodníků sdílet odkaz na nový digitální nástroj ADR a povinnost odpovědět na stížnosti spotřebitelů do 15 pracovních dnů. Tato nová online platforma nabídne jednodušší, rychlejší a levnější způsob řešení sporů, přičemž účast v ADR nebude povinná, kromě nové povinnosti leteckých společností.
Minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector (A9-0370/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
Podpořil jsem návrh, který přináší úpravy pravidel týkajících se odpočinku a přestávek řidičů autobusů a autokarů v rámci nepravidelné přepravy. Cílem je lépe reflektovat specifika tohoto odvětví, kde je pracovní rytmus odlišný kvůli sezónní práci, variabilitě a vzdálenosti řízení podle turistických aktivit. Nový návrh přináší možnost flexibilnějšího rozvržení přestávek, posunutí denního odpočinku a harmonizaci pravidel týkajících se týdenní doby odpočinku. Tato opatření mají za cíl zlepšit pracovní podmínky řidičů a zajistit rovnocenné zacházení jak s mezinárodními, tak s domácími příležitostnými přepravními operacemi. Návrh tak reaguje na nedostatky vzniklé při jednáních o balíčku na podporu mobility, kde byl důraz kladen převážně na nákladní dopravu, což vedlo k situaci, kdy byli řidiči autobusů a nákladních vozidel podrobováni stejným pravidlům odpočinku a pracovní doby.
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (A9-0298/2023 - Alexandr Vondra)
Euro 7 je návrh, který aktuálně nepotřebujeme, a proto jsem jej nepodpořil. Ponechává platné limity emisí a metody jejich testování podle dosavadní normy Euro 6. Takže se jedná pouze o další zbytečnou regulaci. Návrh se mohl věnovat i palčivé otázce zákazu prodeje nových aut se spalovacími motory po roce 2035, ale tyto body dojednaný text neobsahuje. V průběhu projednávání jsme dříve předkládali návrhy umožňující využití tzv. CO2 neutrálních paliv syntetického nebo biologického původu ve spalovacích motorech, které návrh nakonec nezahrnuje. Tato paliva mohla přispět ke snížení emisí a umožnit tak další využívání technologie spalovacích motorů. Navíc jsou naprosto zásadní z hlediska zachování principu technologické neutrality. Ale my opět zatěžujeme průmysl tím, že mu vymýšlíme nadbytečná pravidla, kvůli kterým ztrácíme v konkurenceschopnosti na globálním trhu.
Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Albania on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Albania (A9-0036/2024 - Lena Düpont)
Na plenárním hlasování jsem podpořil dohodu EU s Albánskou republikou o operačních aktivitách agentury Frontex. Jedná se o důležitou dohodu, která umožňuje agentuře Frontex operovat na území Albánie a reagovat tak na nárůst přechodů migrantů skrze západobalkánskou cestu. Albánie je klíčovou tranzitní zemí jak po zemi, tak přes Jaderské moře. Tato dohoda zapadá do širšího okruhu dohod, které EU uzavírá pro boj proti přeshraniční kriminalitě a nelegální migraci.
Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – implementation and outcomes in the Member States (A9-0049/2024 - Andrey Novakov)
I supported the report on cohesion policy in the EU concerning its implementation in the 2014-2020 budgetary period.During this period it is noted that cohesion funds have been used to positive effect to help businesses and households across the EU, including regions of countries with lower GDP than others. These have all been to the benefit to some extent of the Czech Republic, particularly as regards funding of SMEs and carrying into the current budgetary period being used to address the various crises we have faced, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine.I believe that, going forward, cohesion policy will be instrumental in levelling up regions across the EU and providing much needed funding to adapt to our changing world, including for SMEs, greater steps towards the digitalisation of the economy and also making sure that no citizens are left behind. These funds also help the transition to the new energy mix, and crucially make use of the Just Transition Fund for this purpose.I therefore voted in favour of the report and aim to continue the work towards reducing regional inequality.
Asylum and migration management (A9-0152/2023 - Tomas Tobé)
Hlasoval jsem proti novému nařízení o řízení azylu a migraci. Za naprosto zásadní problém považuji zavedení tzv. mechanismu povinné solidarity, zejména pak to, že se každý rok má v Evropské unii přerozdělit minimálně 30 tisíc azylantů do všech zemí, tedy i do České republiky. Flexibilní solidarita zavazuje členské státy ke sdílení dopadů migrace a dává na výběr, zda přijmou určitý poměr azylantů, či se z této povinnosti vyváží zaplacením 20 000 euro za osobu nebo materiální pomocí zasaženým zemím. Neméně problematické je samotné ustanovení roční hodnoty relokací. To na návrh Evropské komise budou hlasovat členské státy formou kvalifikované většiny. Zde hrozí přehlasování států, které nebudou souhlasit s navrženým počtem.
New Regulation on Construction Products (A9-0207/2023 - Christian Doleschal)
Podpořil jsem revizi nařízení o stavebních výrobcích, která harmonizuje pravidla EU pro jejich uvedení na trh. Cílem návrhu je dosáhnout správného fungování vnitřního trhu se stavebními výrobky prostřednictvím harmonizovaných technických specifikací jejich výkonu (např. tepelná vodivost nebo zvuková izolace). Nové nařízení bude přizpůsobovat stavební výrobky k vyšší udržitelnosti a cirkularitě, aby byly odolnější, snáze opravitelné a mohly být recyklovány na konci své životnosti. Cílem je vytvořit společné evropské normy a odstranit překážky volného pohybu stavebních výrobků na vnitřním trhu.
Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehicles (A9-0313/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
Hlasoval jsem proti návrhu na zavedení přísnějších limitů emisí pro nákladní vozidla a autobusy. Zavedení těchto opatření může znamenat zvýšení nákladů pro výrobce nákladních vozidel a autobusů, což by mohlo ovlivnit jejich konkurenceschopnost na trhu. Současně nedostatek infrastruktury pro dobíjení elektromobilů představuje další výzvu, kterou je třeba řešit pro úspěšný přechod na vozidla s nízkými emisemi. Návrh vůbec nerespektuje technologickou neutralitu, omezuje nebo pomíjí dostupná řešení - aby byl návrh přijatelný, bylo by nutné podpořit pozměňovací návrhy na začlenění alternativních CO2 neutrálních paliv, ať už syntetického nebo biologického původu. Bez nich reálně hrozí, že silniční přeprava v jakékoliv podobě přestane být dostupnou. Kamion na baterky dnes skutečně daleko nedojede.
Foodstuffs for human consumption: amending certain 'Breakfast' Directives (A9-0385/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber)
Hlasoval jsem pro přijetí nových pravidel týkající se označování a složení určitých potravin na snídani, jako je med, ovocný džus, marmeláda nebo mléko, s cílem poskytnout spotřebitelům lepší informace. Směrnice zahrnuje například povinné označení země původu medu, jasnější označení obsahu cukru v džusech (produkty označené sníženým obsahem cukru musejí redukovat cukr minimálně o 30 % povolenou metodou, ne například ředění vodou) a minimálního obsahu ovoce v marmeládách. Toto opatření má veliký význam v boji proti podvodům s medem, zajištění lepší ochrany a informovanosti spotřebitelů i včelařů a zvýšení transparentnosti potravin.
Written questions (19)
Regulating artificial intelligence on virtual assistants
Export and transfer of military material – problem of transit licences
Export and transfer of military material – problem of transit licences
State of play of accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the Schengen Area
State of play of Romania and Bulgaria’s accession to the Schengen Area
Euro 7/VII regulations
Call for the proper transposition of Directive (EU) 2017/541 on combating terrorism
State aid Temporary Framework and support for small and medium-sized enterprises
Coverage of pandemic risks for SMEs in Europe
Odometer tampering in used cars
Support for students from Belarus to study at universities in the EU
Reduced VAT rates for equestrian and equine activities
End of the temporary recognition of UK central counterparties
The accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen area
The involvement of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Horizon Europe
TSI-CCS Revision Package
Recognition of roadworthiness tests
Assessing the impact of tariffs on the EU’s automotive industry in the face of non-compliance with the EU’s rules of origin for electric vehicles
Access to vehicle data
Unknown (1)
PROPOSAL FOR A UNION ACT on the transparency of selection procedures for high-ranking EU officials
Amendments (2249)
Amendment 9 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the economic recovery and the climate crisis increase the need to mobilise more resources and re-evaluate current taxation policies in the Member Statesto improve tax collection;
Amendment 79 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock and inflation are highly regressive, with the poorest households being hit the hardest; observes that effective tax rates rose significantly for families with children, particularly at lower income levels10 ; notes with concern that gender inequality worsened during the pandemic; and regrets that the recent crises have also significantly affected the EU SMEs; _________________ 10 OECD, ‘Double blow for workers as inflation drives real wages down and labour taxes up’, 25 April 2023.
Amendment 84 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Observes that COVID-19 financial aid in the form of tax deductions and tax credits helped many companies to overcome the negative consequences of the COVID-19 crisis, however, had a limited impact on those in the greatest need, such as the unemployed, students, pensioners, unreported workers and part- time workers;
Amendment 90 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Observes with concern that inflation has been partially driven by some companies increasing their profit margins, with, for example, Maersk’s annual pre-tax income soaring from USD 967 million in 2019 to USD 30.2 billion in 2022; and at the same time notes with concern that a number of the EU companies, namely SMEs, as well as households, have been suffering from high inflation;
Amendment 98 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the fact thatIs of the view that MNEs that realise excess profits in times of crisis and wealthy individuals who realise significant capital gains through speculation are often undertaxed; notes that a number of EU companies, namely SMEs, have had to cease their operation as a consequence of crisis;
Amendment 125 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and holistic analysis of its tax systemsestablish a robust legal framework with clear rules so that Member States can quickly introduce necessary tax measures and subsequently abolish once not necessary, in order to respond more effectively to future crises and to avoid a lengthy approval procedure;
Amendment 132 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthening the Member States’ tax systems, where appropriate, by making them future and crisis proof, including through the simplification of their national tax systems; calls for the Commission to come forward with a tax proposal under Article 116 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to solve specific tax distortions in the Member States;
Amendment 147 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights that environmental taxes and well-designed incentives have the potential to both cover the need for additional revenues and support a carbon- free economy; calls on the Member States to finally agree on the proposed revision of the Energy Taxation Directive,11 taking into account the needs of individual Member States; _________________ 11 Commission proposal of 14 July 2021 for a Council directive restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (COM(2021)0563).
Amendment 150 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes that in current challenging economic climate, the sustainable tax revenue is crucial; highlights the need to focus on reduction of tax frauds and evasion, especially in the area of indirect taxation; calls on the Member States to use the current tools more effectively or to introduce the new ones in order to eliminate fraudulent practices as much as possible;
Amendment 164 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Takes the view that, as the recent crisis have clearly shown that not all companies or citizens are harmed in the same way, the targeted tax policy can deliver better results than a more general approach, and that tax measures taken by Member States should in future be targeted at those who really need them;
Amendment 16 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) Given the evolving landscape of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems across the EU, transport and tourism traders face challenges in cross- border disputes. Barriers, including language issues, procedural complexity, and associated costs, hinder consumer and trader engagement in ADR. Addressing these challenges is crucial to create a more accessible, coherent and effective cross-border ADR framework, fostering trust and cooperation among consumers and traders.
Amendment 23 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17 a) Traders shall provide information about the ADR contact point, including the name, address, and website link of the ADR entity. This explicit disclosure not only informs consumers but also fosters transparency and accountability among traders. Embracing digital evolution, the inclusion of a website link aligns with current trends in online commerce and the essence of online platforms.
Amendment 29 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2013/11/EU
Article 5
Article 5
1 a. Trader not legally established in the territory of any Member State offering goods or services or marketing in the EU, including digital content and digital services, shall participate in an ADR mechanism and comply with consumer ADR rules. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 35 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
Directive 2013/11/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 8
Article 5 – paragraph 8
8. Member States shall ensure that traders established in their territories that are contacted by an ADR entity from their country or from another Member State, inform that ADR entity whether, or not, they accept to participate in the proposed procedure and reply within a reasonable period of time that shall not exceed 2015 working days..
Amendment 37 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
Directive 2013/11/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 8a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 8a (new)
8 a. Traders shall provide written explanations in case they refuse to participate in an ADR procedure. Traders shall provide consumers with clear and comprehensible information regarding their willingness to participate in ADR procedures. This information shall be easily accessible and displayed, ensuring that consumers are aware of the trader's stance on ADR participation before concluding the contract.
Amendment 39 #
2023/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2013/11/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 2a
Article 14 – paragraph 2a
2 a. Traders shall provide information about the ADR contact point, explicitly including the name, address, and website link of the ADR entity. Such information must be distinctly presented, separate from other content on the traders' websites, ensuring clear visibility and accessibility for consumers.
Amendment 197 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) A significant share of rail freight transport is long-distance and requires cross-border coordination of infrastructure managers. The policy goal of increasing rail traffic also relies on growing cross- border passenger services. To facilitate and promote an increasing cross-border traffic in the single European railway area, it is necessary to ensure greater consistency and harmonisation of the rules and procedures on the management of rail infrastructure capacity. Accordingly, the role of the European Network of Infrastructure Manager should be strengthened with a view to entrusting it with the development of guidelines for the harmonised implementation of this Regulation on procedures and methodologies for the management of rail infrastructure capacity and with the active coordination of cross- border capacity and traffic. In particular, the European Network of Infrastructure Managers should develop European frameworks for capacity management, for the coordination of cross-border traffic management, disruption management and crisis management, and for performance review. The Railway Undertakings and applicants should be also consulted in the development of these European Frameworks.
Amendment 211 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Continuous monitoring of the quality of rail infrastructure and transport services is a precondition for improving the performance of these services. It is therefore necessary to establish a transparent and objective system of indicators that provides feedback on aspects of performance that are relevant for the different operational stakeholders and for the end customers of rail transport services. The main function of that a system should focus on monitoring the fulfilment of commitments made by the operational stakeholders and progress in performance over time while taking into account different circumstances and characteristics within the rail sector. For the establishment of such a system and the analysis of its output, the Commission should be able to rely on independent experts who have solid knowledge of the whole railway sector in the form of a Performance Review Body. This body should be able to provide independent expert advice to the Commission in all areas that influence the performance of rail services and infrastructure management.
Amendment 234 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. As regards trafficcapacity management, infrastructure managers shall ensure that railway undertakings, in cases of disruption concerning them, have full and timely access to relevant information. Whe and the long-term planning of major maintenance, renewal and upgrade of the railway infrastructure, the infrastructure manager grants further access to the traffic management process, it shall do so for the railway undertakings concerned in a transparent and non-discriminatory wayshall consult applicants throughout the process, and at least in accordance with the milestones as defined in Article 3, point 19 of Directive 2012/34/EU, in accordance with this Regulation and, to the best possible extent, take into account the concerns expressed.
Amendment 253 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
(17a) ‘systematic train paths’ means train paths constructed by the infrastructure manager based on operating experience, demand, market forecasts and political goals, which are allocated to market segments, occur at hourly intervals at the same minute and are formed to further optimise the utilisation of infrastructure and to optimise interchange connections between passenger services in node stations.
Amendment 255 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 b (new)
(17b) ‘Compensation for changes to capacity rights’ means an incentive fee due to be paid in the case of the amendment and/or cancellation of an allocated train path. It shall be implemented according to the process in Article 40 and shall be published in the network statement of the respective infrastructure manager.
Amendment 286 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Infrastructure managers shall provide interested parties, in particular applicants, potential applicants and regulatory bodies, with accurate and up-to-date information on the availability of infrastructure capacity throughout the entire capacity management process, including in the strategic planning phase referred to in section 2, during the scheduling and allocation processes set out in section 3 and whenever there are changes to allocated capacity as referred to in section 4. However, there is no need for an update, if a subsequent element of the pre- planning is already published, e.g. if the Capacity Model is already published, the Capacity Strategy does not need to be updated. Similarly, the capacity model does not have to be updated once the capacity supply has been published.
Amendment 292 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Articles 7, 7c and 7e of Directive 2012/34/EU, infrastructure managers shall plan infrastructure work in accordance with the business plan and with the investment and financial programmes referred to in Article 8(3) of Directive 2012/34/EU. Where amendments to those programmes after the adoption of the business plan affect or are likely to affect the planning of infrastructure works, the infrastructure manager shall provide an overview of such amendments and their likely impact in the network statement. The member state shall provide the infrastructure manager with stable and timely announced multiannual funding for the maintenance, renewal and new construction of rail infrastructure for a rolling period of at least 5 years. The amount of money available to the infrastructure manager per year shall be made transparent to the infrastructure manager.
Amendment 296 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In particular, the infrastructure manager shall take into account in a balanced way the impact of infrastructure works on its own asset management and financial situation as well as the operational and financial impact on all applicants concerned. Multiannual funding provided by the member state to the infrastructure manager shall support the goal of establishing this balance. Applicants shall timely provide the infrastructure manager with the information required for the infrastructure manager’s compliance with this provision.
Amendment 301 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Subject to the principle of management independence laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2012/34/EU, Member States may provide the infrastructure manager with strategic guidance based on the indicative rail infrastructure development strategies referred to in Article 8(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU. The guidance shall be provided on time, to allow infrastructure managers and operational stakeholders to follow the deadlines set out in Annex I. That guidance may cover/contain in particular:
Amendment 303 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall coordinate to ensure consistency between the respective strategic guidance they provide in accordance with this paragraph with a view to supporting the development of international passenger and freight rail services. Considering Article 8 of Directive 2012/34/EU, member states shall ensure advance allocation of financial resources for the infrastructure managers for regular maintenance of infrastructure and financial resources for infrastructure development described in the capacity strategy as referred in Article 16.
Amendment 310 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) capacity needs announced by operational stakeholders and the input from the consultation of current and potential applicants in accordance with Article 13;
Amendment 318 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) changes in market demand for infrastructure capacity; including capacity needs announced by applicants for new or modified services;
Amendment 390 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within six months of the completion of a capacity analysis in accordance with Article 22, the infrastructure manager shall establish a capacity-enhancement plan for parts of the infrastructure which have been declared congested. .
Amendment 392 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) the options and costs for capacity enhancement, including measures described in Article 22 (2) and likely changes to access charges.
Amendment 393 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The capacity-enhancement plan shall be establishdeveloped after consultation with usrelevant stakeholders of the relevant congested infrastructure in accordance with Article 13.
Amendment 412 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The infrastructure manager shall be allowed to use the concept of hourly or bi-hourly recurring systematic train paths to maximise capacity. Systematic train paths shall be aligned across borders
Amendment 432 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Infrastructure managers may group systematic train paths into bundles (packages) of hourly, two-hourly or half- hourly train paths taking into account strategic guidance on the utilisation of infrastructure capacity provided by Member States in accordance with Article 11(3). For each such package, one single framework contract for the whole bundle is possible.
Amendment 444 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
In accordance with Article 18 and Article 20, the infrastructure manager shall give priority to requests that are consistent with the pre-planned capacity defined in the capacity supply plan. As a result, the infrastructure manager may either accept or refuse requests that are not consistent with the capacity supply plan, provided operational stakeholders had been duly consulted and their announcements of capacity had been taken into account to the utmost extent.
Amendment 451 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
When refuprocessing requests not consistent with the capacity supply plan, the infrastructure manager should offer an alternative and where time-wise possible preceded by consultation with concerned applicants. If no alternative offer is possible, the infrastructure manager shall, without delay, inform the applicant concerned of its intention to refuse a request. The latter shall have the right to lodge a complaint with the regulatory body.
Amendment 460 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. In accordance with the rules and procedures set out in Article 20, infrastructure managers may refuse to allocatshall try their utmost to offer alternative capacity for rolling planning requests if requests are inconsistent with the capacity supply plan adopted in accordance with Article 18. A refusal shall be communicated to thIf it is not possible to offer an alternative, the IM may refuse to allocate capplicant without delayacity to such inconsistent request. The applicant shall have the right to lodge a complaint with the regulatory body.
Amendment 472 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. In case of conflicting capacity requests involving railrelated to rail transport services with similar characteristics and socio- economic profile, the infrastructure manager shall assignllocate capacity on the basis of an auction or in a way providing access to the largest number of applicants. The latter method shall be applied subject to approval by the regulatory bodyfirst come, first served principle. This method shall be applied only in case of any remaining capacity that was not previously allocated based on the allocation methods enshrined in Articles 31 till 33 hereof and subject to approval by the regulatory body. Should any capacity further remain, even after the proper exercise of all allocation methods referred to in Articles 31 till 35 hereof, it may be allocated on the basis of an auction.
Amendment 581 #
2023/0271(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 62 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. To comply with Article 62(1) to (5), public funding, including from the next Connecting Europe Facility to the infrastructure manager and railway undertakings must be sufficient to ensure a timely, cross-border harmonized and interoperable implementation of digital tools and services.
Amendment 52 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) To achieve these objectives, the right balance between economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, protection of road infrastructure and road safety aspects should be struck. Furthermore, to ensure legislative coherence and legal certainty, this Directive should be aligned as closely as possible with the CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles Regulation and the Combined Transport Directive.
Amendment 71 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Member States should continue to be allowed to run trials on a temporary basis. Indeed, new technologies allowing for in-motion charging, such as solar panels, pantographs and electric roads, or the progressive introduction of EMS in Member States, may require exceeding the maximum weights and dimensions in a testing environment, including in cross- border sections of the road network. Therefore, Member States should continue to be allowed to conduct such trials and be able to test the compatibility of new technologies and concepts across borders. The temporary and innovative nature of trials needs to be clarified by setting up a maximum period of time to conduct them with a possibility for one-time renewal justified by the Member State to the Commission. At the same time, the number of trials of new technologies and innovative schemes should not be restricted to avoid hampering innovation. Member States should regularly monitor and assess the performance and impacts of testing the new technologies and new concepts on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts on the transport system, such as impacts on the modal share.
Amendment 83 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The artificial barriers to the cross- border transport of heavier lorries primarily used in long distance transport (such as vehicle combinations with 5 and 6 axles), should be removed in a harmonised way to take advantage in the short term of the operational, energy and environmental efficiency linked to the greater loading capacity granted by the Member States, including for intermodal transport. To effectively drive the transition towards zero-emission mobility, it is necessary to phase out the use of such heavier lorries running on fossil fuels, as of 2035, when in line with the mtarkget penetration of zero-emission HDVs is projected to increase significantly up to ars set in the CO2 standards for heavy-duty vehicles Regulation. Therefore, the phase-out shounld 50% of new HDV registrationsbe as of 2040, if enabling conditions are met. After the phasing out, heavier lorries should continue to be allowed in national traffic while, in international traffic, they should comply with the maximum authorised weights set up in Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC, which limits the extra weight allowance to zero-emission vehicles and to vehicles involved in an intermodal transport operation.
Amendment 93 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Similarly to the need for extra space, current standards are also not suitable to compensate for the extra weight of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, in particular in long distance transport. Additional weight and axle weight areis necessary for zero- emission vehicle combinations, as well as to the most common passenger vehicles in use in the Union. However, this should be done without increasing axle weights to avoid exponential increase in road wear. Lighter technologies and better aerodynamics will render the use of zero- emission propulsion systems more efficient (for example, to allow for longer range travelled and longer battery life) by reducing their energy consumption. To provide additional incentives to the deployment of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles, to promote technological development, as well as the equipment of vehicles with improved aerodynamics, extra weight allowances should therefore be disconnected from the weight of the zero-emission technology.
Amendment 97 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Effective, efficient, and consistent enforcement of the rules is of utmost importance to ensure undistorted competition between operators and eliminate risks to road safety and to road infrastructure posed by vehicles unlawfully exceeding the applicable weights or dimensions. To better target roadside controls at overloaded vehicles, and if they choose to use automatic systems on the road infrastructure, Member States should ensure as a minimum the deployment of such systems in the trans-European road transport network. Moreover, for reliability and consistency of the enforcement across the Union, the mandatory minimum level of controls to be performed by Member States should be established in proportion to the level of traffic on their territories by the vehicles within scope of this Directive, including an appropriate number of controls during night hours. The system in place in the respective Member States, if technically possible, should recognise additional allowed weights or dimensions to abnormal transport if a valid permit has been issued, to avoid unjustified fines for these transports.
Amendment 123 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Directive 96/53/EC
Article 2 – fourteenth indent
Article 2 – fourteenth indent
— ‘alternatively fuelled vehicle’ shall mean a motor vehicle powered wholly or in part by an alternative fuel and which has been approved under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2018/858,;
Amendment 203 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 96/53/EC
Article 4b – paragraph 3
Article 4b – paragraph 3
Amendment 206 #
2023/0265(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 96/53/EC
Article 4b – paragraph 3
Article 4b – paragraph 3
3. In view of the expected increase in the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, this Article shall apply until 31 December 20349, if enabling conditions are met.’;
Amendment 36 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The digital euro should complement euro banknotes and coins and should not replace the physical forms of the single currency. Individuals should have the right to decide which form of euro denominated legal tender they wish to use. As legal tender instruments, both cash and digital euro are equally important. Regulation (EU) [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on the legal tender of euro banknotes and coins - COM/2023/364] would harmonise legal tender for cash and ensure that cash is widely distributed and effectively used.
Amendment 50 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
Recital 53
(53) Agreements and arrangements related to the provision of digital euro payment services or cross-currency payments involving the digital euro should be concluded on a voluntary basis, in priority with non-euro area Member States. The European Central Bank should cooperate with national central banks of Member States whose currency is not the euro for the purpose of cross-currency payments involving the digital euro. In no case should any natural or legal EU person face discrimination in accessing digital euro.
Amendment 53 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) European Digital Identity Wallets could facilitate digital transactions by enabling authentication, identification and the exchange of attributes including licenses and certificates. European Digital Identity Wallets should contribute to the effective universal access to and use of the digital euro. Member States should issue European Digital Identity Wallets based on common standards and practices set out in the implementing legislation. The European Digital Identity Wallet should have strong and specific safeguards to ensure data protection and privacy and high-level security certification as defined in the article 4(5) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Front-end solutions to be developed by the European Central Bank should therefore duly consider the technical specifications governing the European Digital Identity Wallets. This would enable the relevant interoperability with the European Digital Identity Wallets that would allow to capitalise on these benefits. Based on user choice, interoperability with the European Digital Identity Wallet should also allow to discharge customer due diligence under Regulation (EU) [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation for Anti-Money Laundering Regulation – COM/2021/421 final). Furthermore, to achieve a coherent customer experience, intermediaries might choose to fully integrate their digital euro front-end services into the specifications governing the European Digital Identity Wallets.
Amendment 81 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
28. ‘user alias’ means a unique pseudonymous identifier, that prevents the association or tracking of the user across transactions, used to protect user’s identity when processing digital euro payments that can only be attributable to an identifiable natural or legal person by the payment service provider distributing the digital euro or by the digital euro user;
Amendment 135 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. For the purpose of this Article, payment service providers shall provide the fraud detection and prevention mechanism with information referred to in Annex 5. Payment service providers shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures including state-of-the-art security and privacy-preserving measures to ensure that the support servic, as defined in the article 4(5) of the Regulation 2016/679, to ensure sthall not be able to directly identify the digital euro usert the digital euro users are not directly identified or identifiable natural persons on the basis of the information provided to the fraud detection and prevention mechanism.
Amendment 139 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -34 (new)
Article -34 (new)
Article-34 1. Transaction data shall only be processed for the purposes described in Articles 34, 35, 36, 37. Processing of transaction data shall respect the principles of data minimisation, and data protection by design and by default and shall be carried out in such a manner that the personal transaction data can not be attributed to an individual without the use of additional information in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679. 2. The user shall be informed at the earliest point in time or at the latest when the investigation is concluded about account reidentification without the user's consent that was conducted by the fraud detection unit, the anti-money laundering unit, the ECB or any other EU law enforcement entity or public agency.
Amendment 143 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Payment service providers perform a task in the public interestaccordance with article 6(1) (c) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 where they process personal data for the following purposes:
Amendment 153 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the provision of offline digital euro, the processing of personal data by payment service providers is limited to funding and defunding in accordance with Article 37 paragraphs 3, 4 and 5. In case payment service providers use data they processed for profiling or other activities that do not fall under the purposes of articles 34, 35, 36, 37 or are retained longer than it is legally permitted, the sanction regime of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 applies.
Amendment 193 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a (new)
Amendment 201 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. TPersonal transaction data shall not be retainprocessed by payment service providers or by the European central banks and the national central banks.
Amendment 212 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of point (a), the Commission may request AMLA to adopt an opinion assessing the level of money laundering and terrorist financing threats associated with the offline digital euro and its vulnerabilities. The Commission mayshall consult the European Data Protection Board prior to adopting implementing acts as referred to in paragraph 5.
Amendment 314 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) natural and legal persons of the Union who: (i) reside or are established in a Member State whose currency is not the euro, and (ii) exercise their free movement rights in a Member State whose currency is the euro.
Amendment 99 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets lays down that electronic-money tokens shall be deemed to be electronic money. Electronic money tokens are therefore included, as for the purposes of that regulation. To avoid duplicative requirements it is important that the provisions under this Regulation clearly set out where electronic -money, in the definit tokens should be subject to the provisions of funds in this Regulation.
Amendment 103 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
Recital 45
(45) To be able to make an informed choice payment service users should be able to compare Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) charges with those of other providers. TAs a general principle, domestic ATMs which are not considered as ATM deployers not servicing payment accounts should not charge any fees for withdrawals of cash to consumers. In addition, to increase the transparency of ATM charges for the payment service user payment service providers should provide payment service users with information on all applicable charges for domesticat the initiation of a transaction for Union ATM withdrawals in different situations, depending on the ATM from which the payment service users withdraw cash.
Amendment 104 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) To achieve comparability, the estimated currency conversion charges for credit transfers and remittances carried out within the Union and from the Union to a third country should be expressed in the same way, namely as a percentage mark-up over the latest available euroapplicable foreign exchange reference rates issued by the European Crelevant central Bbank (ECB), and the resultant currency conversion charge shown as a monetary amount in the currency used by the customer to initiate the currency conversion. When reference is made to ‘charges’ in this Regulation, it should also cover, where applicable, ‘currency conversion’ charges.
Amendment 106 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
Recital 52
(52) A surcharge is a charge by merchants to consumers that is added on top of the requested price for goods and services when a certain payment method is used by the consumer. One of the reasons for surcharging is to direct consumers to cheaper or more efficient payment instruments, hence fostering competition between alternative payment methods. Under the regime introduced by Directive (EU) 2015/2366, payees were prevented from requesting charges for the use of payment instruments for which interchange fees are regulated under Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2015/751, i.e. for consumer debit and credit cards issued under four-party card schemes, and for those payment services to which Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council45 applies, i.e. credit transfer and direct debit transactions denominated in euro within the Union. Member States were allowed under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 to further prohibit or limit the right of the payee to request charges, taking into account the need to encourage competition and promote the use of efficient payment instruments. It is necessary to harmonise this approach to foster a level playing field in the Union, and therefore to enact a full ban on surcharging across the Union. __________________ 45 Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro and amending Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 (OJ L 94, 30.3.2012, p. 22).
Amendment 109 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
Recital 53
(53) Evidence gathered during the review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 shows that the current rules on charges are appropriate and had a positive impact. There is no compellingThere is a need for further alignment of charging practices between Member States, as the existing surcharging ban already applies to a very large share ofdoes not apply uniformly to all payments in the Union. It is estimated that 95% of card payments are subject to the existing surcharging ban. In addition, wWhen a surcharge is applied, it is capped at the actual cost incurred by the merchant. However, iIn its review of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, the Commission identified different interpretations concerning the payment instruments covered by the surcharging ban. It is therefore necessary to explicitly extend the surcharging ban to all payment instruments, including credit transfers and direct debits, and not just to those covered by Regulation (EU) No 260/2012, as was the case under Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
Amendment 111 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) To guarantee a high level of security in data access and exchange, access to payment accounts and the data therein should, barring specific circumstances, be provided to account information and payment initiation service providers via an interface designed and dedicated for ‘open banking’ purposes, such as an API. To that end, the account servicing payment service provider should set up a secure communication with account information and payment initiation service providers. To avoid any uncertainty as to who is accessing the payment service user’s data, the dedicated interface should enable account information and payment initiation service providers to identify themselves to the account servicing payment service provider, and to rely on all the authentication procedures provided by the account servicing payment service provider to the payment service user. Account information and payment initiation service providers should as a general rule use the interface dedicated for their access and therefore should not use the customer interface of an account servicing payment service provider for the purpose of data access, except in cases of failure or unavailability of the dedicated interface in the conditions laid down in this Regulation. In such circumstances their business continuity would be endangered by their incapacity to access the data for which they have been granted a permission. It is indispensable that account information and payment initiation service providers be at all times able to access the data indispensable for them to service their clients.
Amendment 114 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
Recital 70
(70) Security of credit transfers is fundamental for increasing the confidence of payment service users in such services and ensuring their use. Payers intending to send a credit transfer to a given payee may, as a result of fraud or error, provide a unique identifier which does not correspond to an account held by that payee. To contribute to the reduction of fraud and errors, payment service users should benefit from a service which would verify whether there is any discrepancy between the unique identifier of the payee and the name, ofr other identifier such as a fiscal number, a European unique identifier as referred to in Article 16(1), second subparagraph, of Directive (EU) 2017/1132, or an LEI, that unambiguously identify the payee, provided by the payer and, should any such discrepancies be detected, notify the payer thereof. Such services, in the countries where they exist, have had a substantial positive impact on the level of fraud and errors. Given the importance of that service for the prevention of fraud and errors, such service should be available free of charge to consumers. To avoid undue frictions or delays in the processing of the transaction, the payment service provider of the payer should provide such notification within no more than a few seconds from the moment the payer has entered the payee information. To enable the payer to decide whether to proceed with the intended transaction, the payment service provider of the payer should provide such notification before the payer authorises the transaction. Certain credit transfer initiation solutions may be available to payers allowing them to place a payment order without inserting themselves the unique identifier. Instead, such data elements are provided by the provider of that initiation solution. In such cases, there is no need for a service verifying the match between the unique identifier and the name of the payee since the risk of fraud or errors is significantly reduced.
Amendment 115 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
Recital 71
(71) Regulation (EU) XXX amending Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 provides for a service verifying the match between the unique identifier and the name or other identifier of the payee to be offered to users of instant credit transfers in euro. To achieve a coherent framework for all credit transfers whilst avoiding any undue overlap, the verification service referred to in the present Regulation should only apply to credit transfers which are not covered by Regulation (EU) XXX amending Regulation (EU) No 260/2012.
Amendment 117 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
Recital 78
(78) Liability provisions in the case of authorised credit transfers where there was an incorrect application or malfunctioning of the service detecting discrepancies between the name or other identifier and unique identifier of a payee would create the right incentives for payment service providers to provide a fully functioning service, with the aim of reducing the risk of ill-informed payment authorisations. If the payer decided to make use of such a service, the payment service provider of the payer should be held liable for the full amount of the credit transfer in cases where that payment service provider failed, whereas it should have done so if properly functioning, to notify the payer of a discrepancy between the unique identifier and the name of the payee provided by the payer and such failure caused a financial damage to the payer. Where the liability of the payment service provider of the payer is attributable to the payment service provider of the payee, the payment service provider of the payee should compensate the payment service provider of the payer for the financial damage incurred.
Amendment 119 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 79
Recital 79
(79) Consumers should be adequately protected in the context of certain fraudulent payment transactions that they have authorised without knowing these transactions were fraudulent. The number of ‘social engineering’ cases where consumers are misled into authorising a payment transaction to a fraudster has significantly increased in recent years. ‘Spoofing’ cases where fraudsters pretend to be employees of a customer's payment service provider, or a relevant entity which could reasonably be linked to a trusted source of the customer, such as a central bank or government authority, and misuse the payment service provider's name, mail address or telephone number to gain the customers’ trust and trick them into carrying-out some actions, are unfortunately becoming more widespread in the Union. Those new types of ‘spoofing’ fraud are blurring the difference that existed in Directive (EU) 2015/2366 between authorised and unauthorised transactions. Means through which the consent may be assumed to be granted are also becoming more complex to identify, as fraudsters can take control of the whole consent and authentication process including of the strong customer authentication completion. The conditions under which the customer authorised a transaction by giving his or her permission to it should be taken into due consideration, including by courts, to qualify a transaction as being authorised or unauthorised. A transaction may indeed have been authorised in circumstances where such authorisation was granted on manipulated premises affecting the integrity of the permission. It is therefore no longer possible, as was the case in Directive (EU) 2015/2366, to limit refunds to unauthorised transactions only. It would however be disproportionate and financially very costly to payment services providers to open every fraudulent transaction, authorised or unauthorised, to a systematic refund right. It might also cause moral hazard and a reduction in the customer’s vigilance.
Amendment 122 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
Recital 81
(81) Given their obligations to safeguard the security of their services in accordance with Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council49 , electronic communications services providers have the capacity to contribute to the collective fight against ‘spoofing’ fraud. Therefore, and without prejudice to the obligations laid down in national law implementing that Directive, electronic communications services providers should also, where relevant, have the same level of liability as payment service providers, and cooperate with payment service providers with a view to preventing further occurrences of that type of fraud, including by acting promptly to ensure that appropriate organizational and technical measures are in place to safeguard the security and confidentiality of communications in accordance with Directive 2002/58/EC. Any claim by a payment service providerfor fraud against other providers, such as electronic communications services providers or online platforms, for financial damage caused in the context of this type of fraud should be made in accordance with national lawthis Regulation. __________________ 49 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p.37).
Amendment 124 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81 a (new)
Recital 81 a (new)
(81 a) Online platforms can also contribute to increasing instances of fraud. Therefore, and without prejudice to their obligations under Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, they should be held liable where fraud has arisen as a direct result of fraudsters using their platform to defraud consumers.
Amendment 128 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 82
Recital 82
(82) To assess possible negligence or gross negligence on the part of the payment service user, account should be taken of all circumstances. The evidence and degree of alleged negligence should generally be evaluated according to national law. However, while the concept of negligence implies a breach of a duty of care, ‘gross negligence’ should mean more than mere negligence, involving conduct exhibiting a significant degree of carelessness; for example, keeping the credentials used to authorise a payment transaction beside the payment instrument in a format that is open and easily detectable by third parties. The fact that a consumer has already received a refund from a payment service provider after having fallen victim of a trusted institution employee impersonation fraud, for example bank employee impersonation fraud, and is introducing another refund claim to the same payment service provider after having been again victim of the same type of fraud could be considered as ‘gross negligence’ as that might indicate a high level of carelessness from the user who should have been more vigilant after having already be victim of the same fraudulent modus operandi.
Amendment 129 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 82 a (new)
Recital 82 a (new)
(82 a) Considering the difference in interpretation across the Union of the term 'gross negligence', the EBA should issue guidelines for Member States on how to define the term.
Amendment 130 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 98
Recital 98
(98) As acknowledged in the Communication from the Commission on a Retail Payments Strategy for the EU, the good functioning of EU payments markets is of substantial public interest. Therefore, when it is necessary in the context of this Regulation for the provision of payment services and for the compliance with this Regulation, payment service providers and payment system operators should be able to process special categories of personal data as defined in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Where special categories of personal data are processed, payment service providers and payment system operators should implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to safeguard the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons. Those measures should include technical limitations on the re-use of data and the use of state-of-the-art security and privacy-preserving measures, including, but not limited to, pseudonymisation, or encryption to ensure compliance with the principles of purpose limitation, data minimisation and storage limitation, as laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The payment service providers and payment systems should also implement specific organisation measures, including training on processing such data, limiting access to special categories of data and recording such access.
Amendment 135 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 104
Recital 104
Amendment 137 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 107 a (new)
Recital 107 a (new)
(107 a)In order for consumers to benefit from continued strong SCA, and that it remains an effective tool in the fight against fraud in electronic payments, it is appropriate that the application of SCA be risk-based and outcome-focused. In turn, the rules on SCA should provide sufficient flexibility for innovation within the payments sector, including in the development of new SCA solutions.
Amendment 140 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 109 a (new)
Recital 109 a (new)
(109 a)In the context of business to business (B2B) or business to government (B2G) payments, SCA should be appropriate to the risk level of such transactions, taking into account in particular the already existing controls and checks that exist among these operators. In order to reduce administrative burden, SCA should not be required for every transaction in these scenarios, and should be adapted to a risk-based approach.
Amendment 141 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 115
Recital 115
(115) Under the exemption from SCA under Article 18 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389, payment service providers were allowed not to apply SCA where the payer initiated a remote electronic payment transaction identified by the payment service provider as posing a low level of risk evaluated on the basis of transaction monitoring mechanisms. Feedback from the market showed however that, in order to have more payment service providers implementing transaction risk analysis, it is necessary to adopt appropriate rules on the scope of transaction risk analysis, introducing clear audit requirements, providing more detail and better definitions on risk monitoring requirements and data to share, and to assess the potential benefits of allowing payment service providers to report fraudulent transactions for which they are solely liable. The EBA should develop draft Regulatory Technical Standards laying down rules on transaction risk analysis. In order to increase the use of this exemption, the draft RTS should consider additional thresholds for the transaction risk analysis exemption. Furthermore, they should consider whether it is necessary to clarify whether payment service providers should count liability only towards the payer in their fraud rates.
Amendment 146 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 140
Recital 140
(140) The EBA should, in line with Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, be granted product intervention powers to be able to temporarily prohibit or restrict in the Union certain type or a specific feature of a payment service or an electronic money service which is identified as potentially causing harm to consumers, threatening the orderly functioning and integrity of financial markets. Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly. Before exerting this power, the EBA should ensure that it has consulted with payment service providers or third-party providers.
Amendment 149 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) payment transactions using electronic money tokens as defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, where the payment service provider has already been authorised as a crypto-asset service provider in a Member State of the European Union for those services under Title V of that Regulation.
Amendment 178 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 30
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 30
(30) ‘funds’ means central bank money issued for retail use, scriptural money and electronic money tokens;
Amendment 186 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 39
(39) ‘unique identifier’ means a combination of letters, numbers or symbols specified by the payment service provider, or a uniquely linked proxy thereof, to the payment service user and to be provided by the payment service user to identify unambiguously another payment service user or the payment account of that other payment service user for a payment transaction;
Amendment 191 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 52
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 52
(52) ‘electronic money services’ means the issuance of electronic money tokens, the maintenance of payment accounts storing electronic money units, and the transfer of electronic money units;
Amendment 195 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 55
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 55
(55) ‘payment institution providing electronic money services’ means a payment institution which provides the services of issuance of electronic money tokens, maintenance of payment accounts storing electronic money units, and transfer of electronic money units, whether or not it also provides any of the services referred to in Annex I.
Amendment 203 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where a currency conversion service is offered prior to the initiation of the payment transaction and where that currency conversion service is offered at an ATM, at the point of sale or by the payee, the party offering the currency conversion service to the payer shall disclose to the payer all charges and the exchange rate to be used for converting the payment transaction prior to the authorisation of the payment transaction by the payer.
Amendment 209 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Natural or legal persons providing cash withdrawal services as referred to in Article 38 of Directive (EU) [PSD3] shall provide or make available to their customers information on any charges before the customer carries out theat the moment of initiatiation of the provision of withdrawal services as well as upon receipt of the cash when the transaction is completed.
Amendment 211 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In cases of payment instruments which, according to the relevant framework contract, concern only individual payment transactions that do not exceed EUR 5100 or that either have a spending limit of EUR 20250 or store funds that do not exceed EUR 2050 at any time:
Amendment 215 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Payment service providers shall provide or make available to payment service users at least the following information and conditions:
Amendment 217 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) where applicable, the estimated charges for currency conversion in relation to credit transfers and money remittance transactions, expressed as a percentage mark-up over the latest available applicable foreign exchange reference rate issued by the relevant central bank. These charges shall be displayed no later than the moment the payer authorises the payment transaction;
Amendment 223 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – introductory part
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – introductory part
(ii) all charges, if any, for domestic,Union automated teller machines (ATMs) withdrawals payable by payment service users to their payment service provider at an ATM of:
Amendment 224 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – point 2
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – point 2
Amendment 225 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) where applicable, the estimated charges for currency conversion services in relation to a credit transfer expressed as a total amount and a percentage mark-up over the latest available applicable foreign exchange reference rate issued by the relevant central bank. These charges shall be clearly displayed before the final execution of the transaction by the payer and shall be displayed in the home currency of the payer in addition to the percentage mark-up;
Amendment 235 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the charges payable by the payer expressed in the currency of the payment and if applicable the percentage mark up on any applicable exchange rates as compared to the mid-market rate of the central bank of issue;
Amendment 236 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where applicable, a breakdown of the amounts of any charges before the payer executes the payment.
Amendment 243 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The payee shall not request charges for the use of any payment instruments, including those for which interchange fees are regulated under Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 and for credit transfers, including instant credit transfers, and direct debit transactions within the Union.
Amendment 247 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Member States mayshall extend the prohibition or limit the right of the payee to request charges for the use of all payment instruments other than the ones referred to in paragraph 3, taking into account the need to encourage competition and promote the use of efficient payment instruments.
Amendment 249 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5
Article 28 – paragraph 5
5. Without prejudice to paragraphs 3 and 4 and for instruments not covered in those paragraphs, the payment service provider shall not prevent the payee from requesting from the payer a charge, offering himoffering the payer a reduction or otherwise steering the payer towards the use of a given payment instrument. Any charges applied shall not exceed the direct costs borne by the payee for the use of the specific payment instrument.
Amendment 252 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In the case of payment instruments which, according to the framework contract, solely concern individual payment transactions not exceeding EUR 5100 or which either have a spending limit of EUR 2050, or store funds which do not exceed EUR 2050 at any time, payment service providers may agree with their payment service users that:
Amendment 280 #
Amendment 281 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. Account servicing payment service providers that offer to a payer a payment account that is accessible online shall have in place at least one dedicatedmachine to machine interface for the purpose of data exchange with account information and payment initiation service providers.
Amendment 282 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to Articles 38 and 39, account servicing payment service providers that offer to a payer a payment account that is accessible online and have put in place a dedicatedn interface as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, shall not be obliged to also maintain permanently another interface as fall-back for the purpose of data exchange with account information and payment initiation service providers, but shall always permit access to interfaces which allow business continuity for those providers.
Amendment 283 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. Account servicing payment service providers shall ensure that their dedicated interfaces referred to in paragraph 1 use standards of communication which are issued by European or international standardisation organisations including the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) or the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Account servicing payment service providers shall also ensure that the technical specifications of any of the dedicated interfaces referred to in paragraph 1 are documented specifying a set of routines, protocols and tools needed by payment initiation service providers and account information service providers for allowing their software and applications to interoperate with the systems of the account servicing payment service provider. Account servicing payment service providers shall make the documentation on technical specifications of their dedicated interfaces referred to in paragraph 1 available, at no charge and without delay, upon request by authorised payment initiation service providers, account information service providers or by payment service providers that have applied to their competent authorities for the relevant authorisation and shall make a summary of that documentation publicly available on their website.
Amendment 285 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – title
Article 36 – title
Requirements regarding dedicated data access interfaces
Amendment 288 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the response time of the dedicated interface to account information service providers’ and payment initiation service providers’ access requests shall not be longer than the response time of all of the interfaces that the account servicing payment service provider makes available to its payment service users for directly accessing their payment account online.
Amendment 289 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Account servicing payment service providers shall ensure that the dedicated interface referred to in Article 35(1) allows both account information service providers and payment initiation service providers to:
Amendment 290 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) see, prior to initiation of the payment in the case of payment initiation service providers, at least, the unique identifier of the account, the associated names or other identifiers of the account holder and the currencies and the account balance as available to the payment service user.
Amendment 291 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. Account servicing payment service providers shall allow account information service providers to communicate securely, via the dedicated interface, to request and receive information on one or more designated payment accounts and associated payment transactions.
Amendment 292 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 4 – point h a (new)
Article 36 – paragraph 4 – point h a (new)
(h a) in the case where the account servicing payment service provider offers multiple authentication options, have the choice to decide which authentication method should be presented to the payer, taking into account the least cumbersome choice for the payer.
Amendment 294 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the confirmation from the account servicing payment service provider as soon as possible, and not longer than 20 seconds after the authorisation by the payer, that the payment has been or will be executed on the basis of the information available to the account servicing payment service provider, taking into account any pre-existing payment orders that might affect the full execution of the payment order being placed.
Amendment 295 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Where the account servicing payment service provider carries out any controls which may impact the execution of the payment, these controls shall take place prior to the confirmation of payment.
Amendment 306 #
Amendment 309 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – title
Article 39 – title
Derogation from having a dedicatedn interface for data access
Amendment 311 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards which shall specify the criteria on the basis of which, in accordance with paragraph 1, an account servicing payment service provider may be exempted from the obligation to have in place a dedicatedn interface and be allowed either to provide, as interface for secure data exchange with account information service providers and payment initiation service providers, the interface that it makes available to its payment user for accessing its payment accounts online or, where appropriate, not to have any interface at all for secure data exchange.
Amendment 323 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Account servicing payment service providers shall ensure that their dedicated interface does not create obstacles to the provision of payment initiation and account information services and enables a straightforward and seamless consumer experience.
Amendment 324 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Prohibited obstacles shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
Amendment 330 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point k
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point k
(k) imposing that the user be automatically redirected, at the stage of authentication, to the account servicing payment service provider’s web page address when this iauthentication as the sole method of carrying out the authentication of the payment services user that is supported by an account servicing payment service provider;
Amendment 331 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point l a (new)
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point l a (new)
(l a) restricting a payment initiation service provider from initiating payments from unique identifiers that are proxies for payment accounts, such as mobile phone numbers, including when such identifiers are otherwise solely made available by account servicing payment service providers to payers in a dedicated channel or system such as a mobile phone application.
Amendment 333 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. For the activities of payment initiation services and account information services the name and the account number or other identifier of the account owner shall not constitute sensitive payment data.
Amendment 344 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – title
Article 50 – title
Discrepancies between the name or other identifier and unique identifier of a payee in case of credit transfers
Amendment 345 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1
Article 50 – paragraph 1
1. In case of credit transfers, the payment service provider of the payee shall, free of charge, at the request of the payment service provider of the payer, verify whether or not the unique identifier and the name of the payeer other identifier that unambiguously identifies the payee, such as a fiscal number, a European unique identifier as referred to in Article 16(1), second subparagraph, of Directive (EU) 2017/1132, or an LEI as provided by the payer match, and shall communicate the outcome of this verification to the payment service provider of the payer. Where the unique identifier and the name ofr other identifier that unambiguously identifies the payee do not match, the payment service provider of the payer shall notify the payer of any such discrepancy detected and shall inform the payer of the degree of that discrepancy.
Amendment 347 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. The payment service providers shall provide the service referred to in paragraph 1 immediately after the payer provided to its payment service provider the unique identifier and the name or other identifier of the payee, and before the payer is offered the possibility to authorise the credit transfer.
Amendment 349 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 7
Article 50 – paragraph 7
7. The matching service referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required where the payer did not input himself the unique identifier and the name or other identifier of the payee.
Amendment 350 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 50 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. The EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the technical requirements of the system developed for the purpose of sharing information pursuant to paragraph 1 and 2, taking into account the different methods of identification used across the Union. When developing the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph, the EBA shall consider various approaches to the methods of information sharing, including decentralised methods. The EBA shall submit the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by [ OP please insert the date= one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Amendment 351 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 a (new)
Article 50 a (new)
Article 50a Addressing location-based payment account identifier discrimination 1. When a payer makes a credit transfer to a payee holding a payment account located within the Union, the payer shall not be required to specify the Member State in which that payment account is located, provided that payment account is reachable. 2. When a payee accepts a credit transfer or uses a direct debit to collect funds from a payer holding a payment account located within the Union, the payee shall not be required to specify the Member State in which that payment account is located, provided that payment account is reachable.
Amendment 353 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. Where a specific payment instrument is used for the purposes of giving permission, the payer and the payer’s payment service provider may agree on fair and proportionate spending limits for payment transactions executed through that payment instrument. Payment service providers shall not unilaterally increase the spending limits agreed with their payment service users.
Amendment 394 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1
Article 59 – paragraph 1
1. Where a payment services user who is a consumer was manipulated by a third party pretending to be an employee of the consumer’s payment service provider or any other relevant entity of public or private nature using the name or e-mail address or telephone number of that payment service providerentity unlawfully and that manipulation gave rise to subsequent fraudulent authorised payment transactions, the payment service provider, electronic commications service provider or online platform, as applicable, shall refund the consumer the full amount of the fraudulent authorised payment transaction under the condition that the consumer has, without any delay, reported the fraud to the police and notified its payment service provider.
Amendment 416 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 4
Article 59 – paragraph 4
4. The burden shall be on the payment service provider of, electronic communications service provider, or online platform used by the consumer to prove that the consumer acted fraudulently or with gross negligence.
Amendment 420 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 5
Article 59 – paragraph 5
5. Where informed by a payment service provider of the occurrence of the type of fraud as referred to in paragraph 1, electronic communications services providers and online platforms shall cooperate closely with payment service providers and act swiftly to ensure that appropriate organizational and technical measures are in place to safeguard the security and confidentiality of communications in accordance with Directive 2002/58/EC, including with regard to calling line identification and electronic mail address.
Amendment 445 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 80 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Payment systems and payment, payment service providers and technical service providers shall be allowed to process special categories of personal data as referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 to the extent necessary for the provision of payment services andor in order to ensure the optimal performance of inherence-based strong customer authentication or for compliance with obligations under this Regulation, in the public interest of the well-functioning of the internal market for payment services, subject to appropriate safeguards for the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, including the following:
Amendment 456 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) support the risk-based application of strong customer authentication in accordance with Article 85;
Amendment 457 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) exempt the application of strong customer authentication based on the criteria under Article 85(11), subject to specified and limited conditions based on the level of risk involved, the types and details of the data assessed by the payment service provider, including through the transaction monitoring mechanisms as outlined in paragraph 2 of this Article;
Amendment 459 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) enable payment service providers to prevent and detect potentially fraudulent payment transactions, including transactions involving payment initiation services.
Amendment 462 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 83 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Transaction monitoring mechanisms shall be based on the analysis of previous payment transactions and access to payment accounts online. Processing shall be limited toinclude, at a minimum, the following data required for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1:
Amendment 468 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 3
Article 83 – paragraph 3
3. To the extent necessary to comply with paragraph 1, point (c), payment service providers may exchange the unique identifier, name, personal identification number, organisation number, modus operandi and other transaction information of a payee with other payment service providers who are subject to information sharing arrangements as referred to in paragraph 5, when the payment service provider has sufficient evidence to assume that there was a fraudulent payment transaction. Sufficient evidence for sharing unique identifiersnformation shall be assumed when at least two different payment services users who are customers of the same payment service provider have informed that a unique identifier of a payee was used to make a fraudulent credit transfer. Payment service providers shall not keep unique identifiersinformation obtained following the information exchange referred to in this paragraph and paragraph 5 for longer than it is necessary for the purposes laid down in paragraph 1, point (c).
Amendment 474 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. To the extent necessary to comply with paragraph 1, point (c), payment service providers may also exchange the information referred to in paragraph 3 with public authorities.
Amendment 479 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4
Article 83 – paragraph 4
4. The information sharing arrangements shall define details for participation and shall set out the details on operational elements, including the use of dedicated IT platforms if applicable. Before concluding such arrangements, payment service providers shall conduct jointly a data protection impact assessment as referred to in Article 35 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and, where applicable, carry out prior consultation of the supervisory authority as referred to in Article 36 of that Regulation.
Amendment 483 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The EBA shall set up a platform allowing payment service providers to exchange information on fraudulent unique identifiers with other payment service providers.
Amendment 493 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 1
Article 84 – paragraph 1
1. Payment service providers shall alertregularly educate their customers via all appropriate means and media won fraud risks. When new forms of payment fraud emerge, taking into account the needs of their most vulnerable groups of customers, payment service providers shall use best effort to alert their customers by all appropriate means. Payment service providers shall give their customers clear indications on how to identify fraudulent attempts and warn them as to the necessary actions and precautions to be taken to avoid falling victim of fraudulent actions targeting them. Payment service providers shall inform their customers of where they can report fraudulent actions and rapidly obtain fraud- related information.
Amendment 496 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A payment service provider shall apply strong customer authentication, on the basis of the risk assessment carried out under transaction monitoring mechanism as set out in Article 83, where the payer:
Amendment 506 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 7
Article 85 – paragraph 7
7. Payment transactions for which payment orders are placed by the payer with modalities other than the use of electronic platforms or devices, such as paper-based payment orders, mail orders or telephone order-based mechanisms, shall not be subject to strong customer authentication, irrespective of whether or not the execution of the transaction is performed electronically, provided that security requirements and checks are carried out by the payment service provider of the payer allowing a form of authentication of the payment transaction.
Amendment 507 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – introductory part
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – introductory part
11. Any exemptions from the application of strong customer authentication to be designed by the EBA under Article 89 shall be based on one or more of the following criteria:the risk assessment performed under transaction monitoring mechanisms in accordance with Article 83 of this Regulation.
Amendment 508 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point a
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point a
Amendment 509 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point b
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point b
Amendment 510 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point c
Article 85 – paragraph 11 – point c
Amendment 516 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 12
Article 85 – paragraph 12
12. The two or more elements referred to in Article 3, point (35), on which strong customer authentication shall be based do not necessarily need to belong to different categories, as long as their independence is fully preserved authentication procedure ensures a high level of security.
Amendment 526 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 87 – paragraph 1
Article 87 – paragraph 1
A payer payment service provider shall enter into an outsourcing agreement withcomply with the existing EBA guidelines on outsourcing arrangements (EBA/GL/2019/02) in case its technical service provider ins case that technical service provider is providing and verifyingrrying out strong customer authentication on an outsourced basis on behalf of the elepayments of strong customer authentication. A service provider. In such circumstances, a payer’s payment service provider shall, under such agreement, retain full liability for any failure to apply strong customer authentication and have the right to audit and control security provisions.
Amendment 531 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 2
Article 88 – paragraph 2
2. Payment services providers shall not make the performance of strong customer authentication dependant on the exclusive use of a single means of authentication and shall not make the performance of strong customer authentication depend, explicitly or implicitly, on the possession of a smartphone. Payment services providers shall develop a diversity of means for application of strong customer authentication to cater for the specificvarious situation of all their customers, specifically those with disabilities, low digital skills, older persons and those who do not have access to digital channels or payment instruments.
Amendment 542 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 89 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) the different practical necessities of consumer payers and corporate payers.
Amendment 543 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 89 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 89 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The EBA, before submitting its draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission, shall have an open consultation with public and private stakeholders in order to ensure that the most up to date advances in technology and payment processing, as well as the specificities of business to business and business to government transactions are taken into account in the draft regulatory technical standards.
Amendment 57 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) As evidenced in the review conducted by the Commission and given the evolution of the respective markets, businesses and risks attached to the activities, it is necessary to update the prudential regime for payment institutions, including those issuing electronic money and providing electronic money services, by requiring a single licence for providers of payment services and electronic money services not taking deposits. Given that Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 lays down in its Article 48(2) that that issuers of electronic money tokens shall be deemed to beauthorised either as a credit institution or as an electronic money institution, the licensing regime for payment institutions, as they will replace the electronic money institutions, sh could also apply to issuservice providers ofn electronic money tokens. The prudential regime applicable to payment institutions should be based on an authorisation, subject to a set of strict and comprehensive conditions, for legal persons offering payment services when not taking deposits. The prudential regime applicable to payment institutions should ensure that the same conditions apply Union-wide to the activity of providing payment services that do not fulfil the conditions laid down for the authorisation as a crypto asset service provider (CASP) in Title V of that Regulation. __________________ 32 Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (OJ L 150, 9.06.2023, p. 40).
Amendment 62 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of 31 May 2023 lays down that electronic money tokens shall be deemed to be electronic money. Electronic money tokens should therefore be treated as electronic money for the purpose of their issuance and redemption, their offering to the public and their admission to trading. Therefore, and exclusively for the purpose of these operations, electronic money tokens should therefore be included, as electronic money, in the definition of funds.
Amendment 67 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45 a (new)
Recital 45 a (new)
(45 a) When acquirers use an agent to deliver payment services, it should be noted that the agent only acts on behalf of one acquirer as the principal payment service provider and not in respect of all payment services provided to the payment services user.
Amendment 68 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45 b (new)
Recital 45 b (new)
(45 b) To take into account evolving market realities, marketplaces and platforms supported by payment service providers, that remove the latter from the control or the possession of funds for third parties, should not be considered by default agents of the payment service providers.
Amendment 91 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Payment institutions shall avoid concentration risk to safeguarded customer funds by ensuring that the same safeguarding method is not used for the totality of their safeguarded customer funds. In particular, they shall endeavour not to safeguard all consumer funds with one credit institution.
Amendment 109 #
2023/0209(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) in the case of payment services using electronic money tokens as defined in the Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, the payment service provider has already been authorised as a crypto-asset service provider in a Member State of the European Union, in accordance with Title V of that Regulation.
Amendment 156 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) A responsible data economy, which is driven by the generation and use of data, is an integral part of the Union internal market that can bring benefits to both Union citizens and the economy. Digital technologies relying on data are increasingly driving change in financial markets by innovating, producing new business models, products and ways for firms to engage with customers.
Amendment 160 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) It should be noted that the costs of implementation of provisions to enable Open Banking through PSD II were high for the sector, particularly smaller actors. While the Directive has allowed the development of new and innovative offerings to customers, a cost-benefit analysis is essential to ensure that the expansion of Open Banking to Open Finance is not prohibitive to firms, particularly smaller firms.
Amendment 162 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Ensuring customer control and trust is imperative to build a well-functioning and effective data sharing framework in the financial sector. Ensuring effective customers’ control over data sharing contributes to innovation as well as customer confidence and trust in data sharing. As a result, effective control may helps overcome customer reluctance to share their data. Under the current Union framework, the data portability right of a data subject in accordance with the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 is limited to personal data and can be relied upon only where it is technically feasible to port the data. Customer data and technical interfaces in the financial sector beyond payment accounts are not standardised, rendering data sharing more costly for businesses. Further, the financial institutions are only legally obliged to make the payment data of their customers available. _________________ 9 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 166 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) A dedicated and harmonised framework for access to financial data is therefore necessarydesireable at Union level to respond to the needs of the digital economy and to remove barriers to a well- functioning internal market for data. Specific rules are required to address these barriers to promote better access to customer data and hence make it possible for consumers and firms to realise the gains stemming from better financial products and services. Data-driven finance wcould facilitate industry transition from the traditional supply of standardised products to tailored solutions that are better suited to the customers’ specific needs, including improved customer facing interfaces that enhance competition, improve user experience and ensure financial services that are focused on the customer as the end user.
Amendment 174 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The sharing of the customer data in the scope of this Regulation should be based on the permission of the customer. The legal obligation on data holders to share customer data should be triggered once the customer has requested their data to be shared with a data user. This request can be submitted by a data user acting on behalf of the customer where permission has explicitly been granted. Where the processing of personal data is involved, a data user should have a valid lawful basis for processing under Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The customers data can be processed for the agreed purposes in the context of the service provided. The processing of personal data must respect the principles of personal data protection, including lawfulness, fairness and transparency, purpose limitation and data minimisation. A customer has the right to withdraw the permission given to a data user at any time. When data processing is necessary for the performance of a contract, a customer should be able to withdraw permissions according to the contractual obligations to which the data subject is party. When personal data processing is based on consent, a data subject has the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time, as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 182 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The customer data included in the scope of this Regulation should include sustainability-related information, where applicable, that should enable customers to more easily access financial services that are aligned with their sustainability preferences and sustainable finance needs, in line with the Commission’s strategy for financing the transition to a sustainable economy12 . Access to data relating to sustainability which may be contained in balance or transaction details related to a mortgage, credit, loan and savings account, as well as access to customer data relating to sustainability held by investment firms, can contribute to facilitating access to data needed to access sustainable finance or make investments into the green transition. Moreover, customer data in the scope of this Regulation should include data which forms part of a creditworthiness assessment related to firms, including small and medium sized enterprises, and which can provide greater insight into the sustainability objectives of small firms. The inclusion of data used for the creditworthiness assessment related to firms should improve access to financing and streamline the application for loans. Such data should be limited to data on firms and should not infringe intellectual property rights. _________________ 12 Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic And Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, COM/2021/390 final
Amendment 195 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The permission dashboard should display the permissions given by a customer, including when personal data are shared based on consent or are necessary for the performance of a contract. The permission dashboard should warn a customer in a standard way of the risk of possible contractual consequences of the withdrawal of a permission, but the customer should remain responsible for managing such risk. The permission dashboard should be used to manage existing permissions. Data holders should inform data users in real-due time of any withdrawal of a permission. The permission dashboard should include a record of permissions that have been withdrawn or have expired for a period of up to two years to allow the customer to keep track of their permissions in an informed and impartial manner. Data users should inform data holders in real-time of new and re-established permissions granted by customers, including the duration of validity of the permission and a short summary of the purpose of the permission. The information provided on the permission dashboard is without prejudice to the information requirements under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 205 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 b (new)
Recital 26 b (new)
(26 b) In the setting up of financial data access schemes, all parties to the schemes should be involved. Competent authorities on both the European and national level should also be available for consultation by those setting up the schemes, and be ready to offer advice on best practice and examples of other schemes set up during the period running up to the application of this regulation.
Amendment 206 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 231 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) mortgage credit agreements, loancredit agreements and accounts, except payment accounts as defined in the Payment Services Directive (EU) 2015/2366, including data on balance, conditions and transactions;
Amendment 240 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) pension rights in occupational pension schemes, in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC and Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council33 ; with the exception of data related to sickness and health cover of a member or beneficiary; _________________ 33 Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) (recast) (OJ L 354, 23.12.2016, p. 37).
Amendment 255 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) data which forms part of a creditworthiness assessment of a firm which is collected as part of a loancredit agreement application process or a request for a credit rating.
Amendment 258 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) payment institutions, including account information service providers and payment institutions exempted pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/2366;
Amendment 260 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) electronic money institutions, including electronic money institutions exempted pursuant to Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35 ; _________________ 35 Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).;
Amendment 277 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. This regulation shall not apply to SMEs, but there shall be an option for SMEs to opt-in to the provisions of the regulation;
Amendment 294 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘consumer’ means a natural person who is acting for purposes other than his or her trade, business or profession, or a current ‘member’ or ‘beneficiary’ of the institution for occupational retirement provisions (IORP), as defined in Article 6 of the IORP II Directive’;
Amendment 309 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘customer data’ means personal and non-personal data that is collected, stored and otherwise processed by a financial institution as part of their normal course of business with customers which are available to the customer, and covers both data provided by a customer and data generated as a result of customer interaction with the financial institution;
Amendment 311 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
(4 a) ‘credit agreement’ means credit agreement as defined in Article 3 point (4) of Directive 2021/2167;
Amendment 320 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6 a) ‘financial information service’ means an online service of collecting or consolidating customer and storing data held by one or several data holders;
Amendment 332 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘investment account’ means any register managed by an investment firm, credit institution or an insurance broker about the current holdings in financial instruments or insurance-based investment products of their client, including past transactions and other data points relating to lifecycle events of that instrument;
Amendment 334 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Amendment 341 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new)
(29 a) 'Small and Medium sized Enterprises' or SMEs, means an SME as defined in point (13) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 346 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The data holder shall, upon request from a customer submitted by electronic means, make the data listed in Article 2(1) available to the customer without undue delay, free of charge, continuously and in real-due time.
Amendment 414 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. A data holder shall provide the customer with a permission dashboard that is permanently available to the customer to monitor and manage the permissions a customer has provided to data users.
Amendment 446 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Within 1836 months from the entry into force of this Regulation, data holders and data users shall become members of a financial data sharing scheme governing access to the customer data in compliance with Article 10.
Amendment 451 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The financial data sharing scheme referred to in paragraph 1 shall be developed by market participants within the specified time-frame. In cases where such a scheme is not developed in accordance with this Regulation in this timeframe, those entities involved in the setting up of the schemes shall work with the relevant competent authorities on national and European level to develop the scheme, considering experiences across the market and always bearing in mind the concept of standardisation of schemes
Amendment 473 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point h – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point h – introductory part
(h) a financial data sharing scheme shall establish, a model to determine the maximum compensation that a data holder is entitled to charge for making data available through an appropriate technical interface for data sharing with data users in line with the common standards developed under point (g) and taking into account market-led initiatives for other compensation schemes. The model shall be based on the following principles:
Amendment 502 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 515 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) a business plan including. where applicable, a forecast budget calculation for the first 3 financial years which demonstrates that the applicant is able to employ the appropriate and proportionate systems, resources and procedures to operate soundly;
Amendment 518 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Financial information service providers shall hold a professional indemnity insurance or other comparable guarantee, covering the territories in which they access data, or some other comparable guarantee, and shall ensure the following:
Amendment 560 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 a (new)
Article 27 a (new)
Article 27a Competent Authorities Role in the Setting up of Financial Data Sharing Schemes Competent authorities may be consulted on market-driven initiatives as regards the setting up of Financial Data Sharing Schemes as provided in Article 9. In such a consultative role they may share non- sensitive data in order to assist in setting up such schemes, with the aim of promoting standardisation, customer friendly interfaces, and sharing best practices.
Amendment 561 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Amendment 562 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Amendment 565 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Amendment 583 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
Article 36 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 242 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. However, Articles 9 to 13 shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 1836 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 244 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 16–a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 252 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Article 16–a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 297 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Article 16–a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 339 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65
Article 16–a – paragraph 7 – point a
Article 16–a – paragraph 7 – point a
Amendment 342 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65
Article 16–a – paragraph 7 – point b
Article 16–a – paragraph 7 – point b
Amendment 352 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 9
Article 16–a – paragraph 9
Amendment 368 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 11
Article 16–a – paragraph 11
Amendment 376 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65
Article 16–a – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 1
Article 16–a – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 391 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 16–a – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
Article 16–a – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 447 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Member States shall ensure that investment firms display appropriate warnings in information materials, including marketing communications, provided to retail clients or potential retail clients, to alert on the specific risks of potential losses carried by particularly risky financial instruments.
Amendment 449 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 5 c – subparagraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 5 c – subparagraph 2
Amendment 453 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 2
Amendment 460 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 4
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 4
Amendment 461 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5c – subparagraph 5
Amendment 652 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Member States shall ensure that investment firms, when providing investment services other than those referred to in paragraph 2, ask the client or potential client to provide information regarding their knowledge and experience in the investment field relevant to the specific type of product or service offered or demanded, and for the retail client or potential retail client, the capacity to bear full or partial losses and risks tolerance so as to enable the investment firm to assess whether the investment service(s) or financial instrument(s) envisaged is appropriate for the client.
Amendment 678 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point c
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 69 – Paragraph 2 – point w
Article 69 – Paragraph 2 – point w
(w) to impose the use of risk warnings by investment firms in information materials, including marketing communications, related to particularly riskycomplex financial instruments where those instruments could pose a serious threat to investor protection.;
Amendment 686 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 88 ba (new)
Article 88 ba (new)
Amendment 1155 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2 - subpoint 1
Annex I – point 2 - subpoint 1
Directive 2014/65/EU
Annex II – section II.1 – subparagraph 5
Annex II – section II.1 – subparagraph 5
(1) the first, second and third indents are replaced by the following:
Amendment 1159 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – subpoint 1
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – subpoint 1
Directive 2014/65/EU
Annex II – Section II.1 – subparagraph 5 – first indent
Annex II – Section II.1 – subparagraph 5 – first indent
Amendment 1165 #
2023/0167(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – subpoint 1
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – subpoint 1
Directive 2014/65/EU
Annex II – Section II.1 – subparagraph 5 – second indent
Annex II – Section II.1 – subparagraph 5 – second indent
- the size of the client’s financial instrument portfolio, defined as including cash deposits and financial instruments exceeds EUR 25100 000 on average during the last 3 years,’;
Amendment 30 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
Recital 45
(45) When suppliers’ do not ensure that their electricity portfolio is sufficiently hedged changes in wholesale electricity prices can leave them financially at risk and, potentially result in their failure, passing on costs to consumers and other network users. Hence, it should be ensured that suppliers are appropriately hedged when offering fixed price contracts. An appropriate hedging strategy should be in line with relevant Union financial services legislation, delineating clearly between derivatives and wholesale electricity market spot prices, and take into account the suppliers' access to its own generation and its capitalisation as well as its exposure to changes in wholesale market prices.
Amendment 33 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
Recital 53
(53) Public interventions in price setting for the supply of electricity constitute, in principle, a market-distortive measure. Such interventions may therefore only be carried out as public service obligations and are subject to specific conditions. Under this Directive regulated prices are possible for energy poor and vulnerable households, including below costs, and, as a transition measure, for households and small and micro-enterprises. In times of crisis, when wholesale and retail electricity prices increase significantly, and this is having a negative impact on the wider economy, Member States should be allowed to extend, temporarily, the application of regulated prices also to SMEs. For both households and MSMEs, Member States should be temporarily allowed to set regulated prices below costs as long as this does not create distortion between suppliers and suppliers are compensated for the costs of supplying below cost. However, it needs to be ensured that such price regulation is targeted and does not create incentives to increase consumption. Hence, such price regulation should be limited to 80% of median household consumption for households and micro-enterprises, and 70% of the previous year’s consumption for SMEs. The Commission should determine when such an electricity price crisis exists and consequently when this possibility becomes applicable. The Commission should also specify the validity of that determination, during which the temporary extension of regulated prices applies, which may be for up to one year. To the extent that any of the measures envisaged by the present Regulation constitute State aid, the provisions concerning such measures are without prejudice to the application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU.
Amendment 37 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54 a (new)
Recital 54 a (new)
(54a) Specifically, where entities are considered financial instruments and are subject to the requirements under Regulation (EU) 600/2014, those entities should not be subject to the regulatory and reporting requirements laid out in this regulation to avoid over-burden in terms of administrative and compliance costs
Amendment 45 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 9 – Paragraph 1
Article 9 – Paragraph 1
1. By 1 December 2024 the ENTSO for Electricity shall submit to ACER, after having consulted ESMA and ensuring a clear delineation between compliance and reporting requirements related to financial instruments as defined in Directive 2014/65 and those same requirements as regards products in wholesale energy markets which are not financial instruments, a proposal for the establishment of regional virtual hubs for the forward market where it is deemed to be in the interest of consumers in those regions. The proposal shall:
Amendment 47 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Within six months of receipt of the proposal on the establishment of the regional virtual hubs for the forward market, ACER, shall evaluate it and either approve or amend it. In the latter case, ACER, after informing ESMA, shall consult the ENTSO for Electricity before adopting the amendments. The adopted proposal shall be published on ACER's website.
Amendment 53 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. Where a regulatory authority considers that there are insufficient hedging opportunities available for market participants, and after consultation of relevant financial market competent authorities in case the forward markets concern financial instruments as defined under Article 4(1)(15) of Directive (EU) 2014/65, it may require power exchanges or transmission system operators to implement additional measures, such as market-making activities, to improve the liquidity of the forward market. Subject to compliance with Union competition law and with Directive (EU) 2014/65 and Regulations (EU) 648/2012 and 600/2014, market operators shall be free to develop forward hedging products, including long- term forward hedging products, to provide market participants, including owners of power-generating facilities using renewable energy sources, with appropriate possibilities for hedging financial risks against price fluctuations. Member States shall not require that such hedging activity may be limited to trades within a Member State or bidding zone.
Amendment 85 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 69a – subparagraph 1a (new)
Article 69a – subparagraph 1a (new)
Competent financial authorities and competent electricity market and energy authorities shall exchange information on an ongoing basis to ensure that the requirements set out in this Regulation do not increase compliance requirements, reporting costs and administrative costs for those market participants carrying out both derivative and spot market transactions. They shall also ensure that market participants are made aware of the specific regulatory requirements they must adhere to accordingly.
Amendment 89 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that all household customers and micro- enterprises, and, where Member States consider it appropriate, small enterprises, enjoy universal service, namely the right to be supplied with electricity of a specified quality within their territory at competitive, easily and clearly comparable, transparent and non- discriminatory prices. To ensure the provision of universal service, Member States shall impose on distribution system operators an obligation to connect customers to their network under terms, conditions and tariffs set in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 59(7). This Directive does not prevent Member States from strengthening the market position of the household customers and small and medium-sized non- household customers by promoting the possibilities for the voluntary aggregation of representation for that class of customers.
Amendment 23 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation applies to trading in wholesale energy products. Articles 3, 5, 5a and 9(1), second subparagraph of this Regulation shall not apply in relation to wholesale energy products which are financial instruments and to which Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 applies. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Directive (EU) 2014/65, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, Regulation (EU) 600/2014 and Regulation (EU) 648/2012 as regards activities involving financial instruments as defined underin Article 4(1), point (15), of Directive (EU) 2014/65 as well as to the application of European competition law to the practices covered by this Regulation.
Amendment 25 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – point 2 – point (a) – introductory part
Article 2 – point 2 – point (a) – introductory part
(a) entering into any transaction, issuplacing any order to trade or engaging in any other behaviour relating to wholesale energy products which:
Amendment 26 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – point 2 – point a – point ii
Article 2 – point 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) secures, or is likely to secure , by a person, or persons acting in collaboration, the price of one or several wholesale energy products at an artificial level, unless the person who entered into the transaction or issued the order to trade establishes that his reasons for doing so are legitimate and that that transaction or order to trade conforms to accepted market practices on the wholesale energy market concerned; or
Amendment 27 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – point 2 – point a – subparagraph ii – second subparagraph (new)
Article 2 – point 2 – point a – subparagraph ii – second subparagraph (new)
(iia) unless the person who entered into the transaction or placed the order to trade establishes that his reasons for doing so are legitimate and that that transaction or order to trade conforms to accepted market practices on the wholesale energy market concerned; or (This text should come as a separatae subparagraph after points (i) and (ii) as it applies to both points.)
Amendment 29 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17
(17) ‘inside information platform’ or ‘IIP’ means a person registered under this Regulation to provide the service of operating a platform for the disclosure of inside information and for the reporting of disclosed inside information to the Agency on behalf of market participants.;
Amendment 37 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
(20) ‘organised market place’ (‘OMP’) means an energy exchange, an energy broker, an energy capacity platform or any other person professionally arranging or executing transactions, including shared order book providers but excluding trading venues as defined in Article 4(1), point (24), of Directive 2014/65/EU and purely bilateral trading where two natural persons enter into each trade on their own account.
Amendment 39 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 24a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1– point 24a (new)
(24a) ‘benchmark’ means any index that is not a benchmark as defined in Article 3(1), point (29), of Regulation (EU) 596/2014 and that is periodically or regularly determined by the application of a formula to, or on the basis of, the underlying wholesale energy products, including estimated prices, by reference to which the amount payable under a wholesale energy product or a contract relating to a wholesale energy product, or the value of a wholesale energy product, is determined;
Amendment 44 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Market participants shall disclose the inside information through IIPs. The IIPs shall ensure that the inside information is made public in a manner which enables fast access, including access through a clear application programming interface. and complete, correct and timely assessment of the information by the public.; Liability for the provision of inside information received by the IIPs to the Agency is therefore attributed to the IIPs.
Amendment 56 #
2023/0076(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Market participants entering into transactions which are required to be reported to ACER in accordance with Article 8(1) shall register with the national regulatory authority in the Member State in which they are established or resident. Market participants resident or established in a third country shall declare an office , in a Member State in which they are active and register with the national regulatory authority of thatin a Member State in which they are active.;
Amendment 219 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The minimum ages of applicants for the different categories of driving licences should be set at Union level. Nevertheless, Member States should be allowed to set a higher age limit for the driving of certain categories of vehicles in order to further promote road safety. Member States should in exceptional circumstances be allowed to set lower age limits in order to take account of national circumstances. In particular, to allow the driving of fire service and public order maintenance related vehicles or pilot projects related to new vehicle technologies. The shortage of professional drivers affecting many Member States also constitutes a valid reason for lowering the minimum age requirement. The increasing urban population and the resulting need to expand public transportation services in these areas to address environmental air quality and traffic congestion issues only further amplify the demand for drivers. To address the driver shortage and attract young workers to this sector, it is essential to adjust the minimum age requirements to allow entry into the profession as soon as possible after completing secondary education.
Amendment 301 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that by 19 January 20303, all physical driving licences issued or in circulation fulfil all the requirements of this Directive.
Amendment 322 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 1
– motor vehicles with a maximum authorised mass not exceeding 3 504 250 kg and designed and constructed for the carriage of no more than eight passengers in addition to the driver.
Amendment 326 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point viii – indent 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point viii – indent 1
– motor vehicles designed and constructed for the carriage of more than 8 but not more than 1622 passengers in addition to the driver and with a maximum length not exceeding 8 meters.
Amendment 351 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) 218 years for powered tricycles exceeding 15 kW;
Amendment 408 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) two years after a driving licence, granted for category B, was issued for the first time it shall be valid for driving the alternatively fuelled vehicles referred to in Article 2 of Council Directive 96/53/EC63 with a maximum authorised mass above 3 500 kg but not exceeding 4 250 kg without a trailer. __________________ 63 Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community th(13) and Article 2(13a) of this Directive, of categories M and N, that are intended to be used on public roads, including those designed and constructed in one or more courses whose maximum authoriszed dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic (OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 59)mass is greater than 3 500 kg but not exceed 4 250 kg without a trailer.
Amendment 417 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) two years after a driving licence, granted for category B, was issued for the first time it shall be valid for driving the alternatively fuelled vehicles referred to in Article 2 of Council Directive 96/53/EC63 with a maximum authorised mass above 3 504 250 kg but not exceand motor caravans defined ing 4 250 kg without a trailer Annex I, Part A, point 5.1 to Regulation (EU) No 2018/858. __________________ 63 Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic (OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 59).
Amendment 423 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) two years following the initial issuance of a driving licence for category C1 shall render it valid for operating alternatively fuelled vehicles referred to in Article 2(13), provided they have a maximum authorized mass above 7 500 kg but not exceeding 8 250 kg without a trailer. Motor vehicles falling under this category may be coupled with a trailer, as long as the trailer's maximum authorized mass does not exceed 750 kg.
Amendment 428 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h b (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h b (new)
(hb) two years following the initial issuance of a driving licence for category C1E, it shall be considered valid for operating alternatively fuelled vehicles as described in Article 2(13). These vehicles should have a maximum authorized mass exceeding 7 500 kg but not exceeding 8 250 kg when not towing a trailer. Vehicles in this category are permitted to be coupled with a trailer or semi-trailer with a maximum authorized mass exceeding 750 kg, provided that the combined authorized mass of the vehicle and the trailer does not exceed 12 750 kg.
Amendment 543 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The accompanied driving scheme does not restrict Member States’ existing options to lower the minimum age for category B and to apply related conditions nationally.
Amendment 547 #
2023/0053(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The holder of a driving licence of a given category issued for the first time shall be considered a novice driver and shall be subject to a probationary period of at leastissued after the passing of a driving test shall be subject to a probationary period of at least two years. If the holder of the driving licence already has a valid driving licence for another category, the probationary period shall only include what may remain of the probationary period for the existing driving licence, unless the existing driving licence is issued for category AM only. The duration of the probationary period shall be determined by the Member State issuing the driving licence and shall not be less than two years.
Amendment 27 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) All sectors of the economy are expected to contribute to achieving those emission reductions, including the road transport sector, which is the only sector in the EU in which emissions have been trending upwards since the 1990s. The Green Deal has set the ambitious target of a 90% reduction in transport emissions in order to achieve carbon neutrality in the EU by 2050.
Amendment 28 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) While the review of this regulation forms part of efforts to meet the environmental objectives of decarbonising road transport in order to combat climate change, it should also take into account the significant industrial and social consequences of this process to ensure employment and accessible mobility for all.
Amendment 36 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The strengthened CO2 emission reduction requirements should incentivise an increasing share of zero-emission and low-emission vehicles being deployed on the Union market whilst providing benefits to users and citizens in terms of air quality and energy savings, as well as ensuring that innovation in the automotive value chain can be maintained. Zero-emission vehicles currently include battery electric vehicles, fuel-cell and other hydrogen-powered vehicles, and technological innovations are continuing. The automotive industry remains one of the pillars of the EU economy, contributing 7% of European GDP, providing 4.6 million jobs and remaining at the cutting edge of technological innovation with EUR 60 billion invested each year in research and development. The industry needs to be supported in its environmental and digital transition, as European manufacturers are now facing a triple bind, with tightened environmental regulations, increasing investment needs in innovation and heightened international competition. The strengthened CO2 emission reduction standards must become technology neutral in reaching the fleet-wide targets that they set. Zero and low-emission vehicles, which run on advanced biofuels or synthetic fuels as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/20011a. Zero-emission and low- emission vehicles currently include battery electric vehicles, fuel-cell and other hydrogen-powered vehicles, and technological innovations are continuing. __________________ 1a Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast)
Amendment 43 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Against that background, new strengthened CO2 emission reduction targets should be set for new heavy-duty vehicles for the period 2030 onwards. Those targets should be set at a level that will deliver a strong signal to accelerate the uptake of zero-emission and low-emission vehicles on the Union market and to stimulate innovation in zero-emission technologies in a cost- efficient way and be consistent with the existence of the necessary enabling conditions, in particularly the deployment of charging and refuelling infrastructure across the Union.
Amendment 48 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Against that background, new strengthened CO2 emission reduction targets should be set for new heavy-duty vehicles for the period 2030 onwards. Those targets should be set at a level that will deliver a strong signal to accelerateconsistent with the availability of enabling conditions, namely sufficiently dense network of alternative fuels infrastructure, with the aim of promoting the uptake of zero-emission vehicles on the Union market and to stimulate innovation in zero-emission technologies in a cost- efficient way.
Amendment 50 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The principle of technological neutrality is fundamental to ensure there is efficiency and a plurality of solutions, to preserve and fasten innovation and development, including in disruptive technologies, and to allow market flexibility and a diverse range of social behaviours. It is thus important that we do not limit road transport to a single technology but rather encourage innovation and complementarities between efficient alternative technologies, such as the combined use of hybrid vehicles and low-carbon fuels. Furthermore, a ‘one size fits all’ approach at European level would be compromised by the wide economic, social, geographical and infrastructural diversity within and between Member States, whereas a mix of complementary technologies allows each region to implement the solutions it deems most appropriate to reduce its emissions.
Amendment 53 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Complimentary to the efforts of this regulation towards increasing the availability and uptake of zero-emission vehicles, a carbon correction factor should be introduced to properly reflect the contribution of the use of CO2 neutral fuels, such as biofuels, biogas, biomass fuels and synthetic fuels, when assessing the compliance with CO2 emissions reductions of newly registered heavy-duty vehicles.
Amendment 54 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 b (new)
Recital 10 b (new)
(10b) Following consultation with stakeholders, the Commission will make a proposal for registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels for compliance purposes and in conformity with the Union’s climate neutrality objective.
Amendment 55 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 – paragraph 1
Recital 11 – paragraph 1
The updated New Industrial Strategy14 foresees the co-creation of green and digital transition pathways in partnership with industry, public authorities, social partners and other stakeholders. In this context, a transition pathway is being developed for the mobility ecosystem to accompany the transition of the automotive value chain. The pathway takes particular heed of small and medium-sized enterprizses in the automotive supply chain, of the consultation of social partners including by Member States, and also build on the European Skills Agenda with initiatives like the Pact for Skills to mobilise the private sector and other stakeholders to up-skill and re-skill Europe’s workforce in view of the green and digital transitions and on the Talent Booster Mechanism in the framework of the Harnessing Talents in EU regions initiative. The appropriate actions and incentives at the European and national level to boost the affordability of zero- emission vehicles are also being addressed in the pathway. This could, for example, include the possibility for Member States to use the proposed Social Climate Fund to assist micro-enterprises in the purchasing of zero-emission trucks and lorries. Particular attention should be also given to the impact that this transition will have on SMEs along the supply chain. __________________ 14 Commission Communication on Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery, COM(2021) 350 final of 5 May 2021.
Amendment 56 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 – paragraph 1
Recital 11 – paragraph 1
The updated New Industrial Strategy14 foresees the co-creation of green and digital transition pathways in partnership with industry, public authorities, social partners and other stakeholders. In this context, a transition pathway is being developed for the mobility ecosystem to accompany the transition of the automotive value chain. The pathway takes particular heed of small and medium-sized enterprizses in the automotive supply chain, of the consultation of social partners including by Member States, and also build on the European Skills Agenda with initiatives like the Pact for Skills to mobilise the private sector and other stakeholders to up-skill and re-skill Europe’s workforce in view of the green and digital transitions and on the Talent Booster Mechanism in the framework of the Harnessing Talents in EU regions initiative. The appropriate actions and incentives at the European and national level to boost the affordability of zero- emission and low-emission vehicles are also being addressed in the pathway. This could, for example, include the possibility for Member States to use the proposed Social Climate Fund to assist micro- enterprises in the purchasing of zero- emission trucks and lorries. __________________ 14 Commission Communication on Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery, COM(2021) 350 final of 5 May 2021.
Amendment 62 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The Union fleet-wide targets are to be complemented by the necessarydependent on the rapid roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure as set out in the Commission Proposal for a regulation on the deployment of alternative fuel infrastructure16 . __________________ 16 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, and repealing Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, 14.7.2021, COM/2021/559 final.
Amendment 63 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
Amendment 71 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) The market adoption of zero- emission heavy-duty vehicles depends on the enabling conditions allowing road haulers to operate the vehicles seamlessly and more profitably than conventional diesel trucks. The availability of charging and refuelling infrastructure, effective carbon pricing measures, including road user charges differentiated by CO2 emissions, and supportive and well- synchronized vehicle regulations are crucial enabling conditions that are outside of the direct control of vehicle manufacturers. Therefore, the state of the most important enabling conditions should be monitored on an annual basis. If one or more of the enabling conditions are found to be not in line with the CO2 targets for vehicle manufacturers, the targets should be reviewed and financial penalties (excess CO2 emissions premiums) for vehicle manufacturers be waived.
Amendment 74 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Manufacturers should be provided with sufficient flexibility in adapting their fleets over time in order to manage the transition towards zero-emission and low- emission vehicles in a cost-efficient manner, and i. The progressively more ambitious emission reduction targets have increased the costs of compliance for manufacturers. It is therefore appropriate to maintain the approach of decreasing target levels in five-year steps.
Amendment 83 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Extra heavy combinations (EHC) are vehicles with above standard masses and often also dimensions. They have increased energy efficiency gains and lowered relative fuel use due to higher payloads compared to average EU trucks. However, in the current calculation formula related to the CO2 HDV targets, this is not taken into account. In order to correct this and reflect the EHC emissions more realistically, the calculation formula should be modified accordingly.
Amendment 91 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 117 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) The zero- and low-emission factor should last be applied for the reporting period of the year 20239, because it is no longer considered necessary after that time as an incentive toin order to continue promoteing the market entrance of zero-emission vehicles in the heavy-duty sector.
Amendment 121 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
Amendment 127 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39 a (new)
Recital 39 a (new)
Amendment 130 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) This regulation aims to accelerate the transition towards carbon neutral mobility in a technologically neutral way. As a complement to the efforts towards an increasing availability of zero emission vehicles, following consultation with stakeholders, the Commission will make a proposal for a mechanism to duly account the contribution from the use of sustainable renewable transport fuels including biofuels, biomass fuels as well as RFNBOs when assessing the compliance with CO2 emissions reductions of newly registered heavy-duty vehicles.
Amendment 134 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) In order to speed-up the transition a mechanism, based on a carbon correction factor is introduced that reflects the CO2 intensity and the share of CO2 neutral fuels.
Amendment 135 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 b (new)
Recital 42 b (new)
(42b) a new definition of "CO2 neutral fuels" is introduced to allow for renewable fuels as defined in Directive 2018/2001, including biofuels, biogas, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin or recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 143 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Vehicle groups 11, 12 and 16 from N3 category shall not be subject to the CO2 emission targets set out in Article 3a of this Regulation.
Amendment 145 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 2 – paragraph 6
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. The reporting obligations laid down in Articles 13a to 13f shall also apply to the vehicles that are not subject to CO2 emission targets in accordance with paragraphs 4, 4a and 5 of this Article.;
Amendment 153 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point f a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point f a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article – point 23 b (new)
Article – point 23 b (new)
(fa) the following points (23a) and (23b) are inserted: (23a) “CO2 Neutral Fuel” means a biofuel, biogas, biomass fuel, Renewable liquid and gaseous transport Fuel of Non Biological Origin (RFNBO) or a Recycled Carbon Fuel (RCF), where the emissions of the fuel in use complies with a minimum threshold of greenhouse gas emissions savings at least 70% as laid down in Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
Amendment 159 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 3 – point 23 a (new)
Article 3 – point 23 a (new)
(23a) "CO2 Neutral Fuels" means renewable fuels as defined in Directive 2018/20011a, including biofuels, biogas, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin or recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 162 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point i
Regulation 2019/1242
Article 3 – point 23 b (new)
Article 3 – point 23 b (new)
(23b) "Carbon Correction Factor" means a factor reflecting the CO2 intensity and share of CO2 neutral fuels;
Amendment 171 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(b) for all vehicle sub-groups for the reporting periods of the years 2030 to 2034 by 4530 %,
Amendment 174 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(c) for all vehicle sub-groups for the reporting periods of the years 2035 to 2039 by 650 %,
Amendment 187 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 1 – paragraph 1 point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 point 4
(d) for all vehicle sub-groups for the reporting periods of the years 2040 onwards by 970%.
Amendment 194 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 3 b – paragraph 1
Article 3 b – paragraph 1
1. For vehicles referred to in point 4.2 of Annex I, manufacturers shall comply with the minimum shares of zero-emission vehicles in their fleet of new heavy-duty vehicles as laid down in point 4.3 of Annex I. For new urban buses the share of zero- emissions vehicles shall be 80% as from the reporting period of the year 2030 and 100% as from the reporting period of the year 20305.;
Amendment 198 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 3 b – paragraph 1
Article 3 b – paragraph 1
1. For vehicles referred to in point 4.2 of Annex I, manufacturers shall comply with the minimum shares of zero-emission vehicles in their fleet of new heavy-duty vehicles as laid down in point 4.3 of Annex I. For new urban buses the share of zero- emissions vehicles shall be 10085% as from the reporting period of the year 2030.;
Amendment 223 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 4 – paragraph1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph1 – point b a (new)
(5a) in Article 4, first paragraph, the following point (ba) is inserted: the application of the Carbon Correction Factor
Amendment 224 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
(5b) Methodology for registration of heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels the following Article 4a is inserted: Article 4a Following consultation with stakeholders, at the latest one year after the entry into force of the regulation, the Commission will make a proposal for registering heavy-duty vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels for compliance purposes and in conformity with the Union’s climate neutrality objective.
Amendment 229 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 1 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 6 – point a
Starting from 1 July 2020 and for each subsequent reporting period until the reporting period of the year 2029, the Commission shall determine for each manufacturer the zero- and low-emission factor for the preceding reporting period.
Amendment 235 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The zero-emission and low- emission factor shall reduce the average specific CO2 emissions of a manufacturer by a maximum of 310 %. The contribution to that factor of the zero-emission vehicles of category N, other than those in vehicles sub-groups 4-UD, 4-RD, 4-LH, 5-RD, 5- LH, 9-RD, 9-LH, 10-RD, 10-LH, shall reduce the average specific CO2 emissions of a manufacturer by a maximum of 1,53 %.;
Amendment 243 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Emission credits and emission debts acquired in the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2039 shall, where applicable, be carried over from one reporting period to the next reporting period. However, any remaining emission debts shall be cleared in the reporting periods of the year 2029, 2034 and 2039.;
Amendment 251 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where, in any of the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2028, 2030 to 2033, 2035 to 2038 the sum of the emission debts reduced by the sum of the emission credits exceeds the emission debt limit referred to in Article 7(1), third subparagraph;
Amendment 254 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where, infrom the reporting period of the years 2029, 2034, 2039 and 2040 the sum of the emission debts redu 2041 onwards, the manufacturer’s average specific CO₂ emissions exceed by the sum of the emission credits is positiveits specific CO₂ emissions target.’;
Amendment 255 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 256 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 13 a – paragraph 1
Article 13 a – paragraph 1
Starting from the reporting period of the year [PO: please insert year: if entry into force is before 1st July, insert the year of entry into force of the Regulation minus 1; if entry into force is after 30th of June, insert the following year], Member States shall monitor the data specified in Annex IV, Part A relating to new heavy-duty vehicles registered for the first time in the Union. The competent authorities shall refrain from contacting manufacturers and instead refer to the data shared with local vehicle registration authorities to fulfil their monitoring and reporting obligations under this regulation.
Amendment 259 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Amendment 261 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Amendment 265 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, in 2028, review the effectiveness and impact of this Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council with the result of the review. The Commission shall in particular annually assess the deployment of charging and refuelling infrastructure for heavy duty vehicles across the Union.
Amendment 274 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
By 2026 the Commission shall publish a report developing a methodology to assess the life-cycle CO2 emissions of heavy-duty vehicles. The Commission is empowered to delegated acts to set out a methodology for the assessment of the life-cycle CO2 emissions of heavy duty vehicles placed in the Union market.
Amendment 287 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1.2 – table
Annex I – point 1 – point 1.1.2 – table
1.1.2. For vehicles of category M the sub-group sg is defined as follows: Vehicle group pursuant to Annex I to Vehicle sub-group (sg) attributed for the purposes Regulation (EU) 2017/2400 of this Regulation 31a, 31d 31-LF 31b1 31-L1 31b2 31-L2 31c, 31e 31-DD 32a, 32b 32-C2 32c, 32d 32-C3 32e, 32f 32-DD 33a, 33d, 37a, 37d 33-LF 33b1, 37b1 33-L1 33b2, 37b2 33-L2 33c, 33e, 37c, 37e 33-DD 34a, 34b, 36a, 36b, 38a, 38b, 40a, 40b 34-C2 34c, 34d, 36c, 36d, 38c, 38d, 40c, 40d 34-C3 34e, 34f, 36e, 36f, 38e, 38f, 40e, 40f 34-DD 35a, 35b1, 35b2, 35c 35-FE 39a, 39b1, 39b2, 35c9c 39-FE
Amendment 289 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – point 1.2
Annex I – point 1 – point 1.2
Amendment 292 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
CCFi is the Carbon Correction Factor for the fuel or blend of fuels in use i, as defined in Article 3 point (23b new) and calculated according to paragraph 7 Annex I.
Amendment 296 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 6
CO2pv,mp isare the CO2 emissions in g/km of the primary vehicle of the new heavy-duty vehicle v, determined for a mission profile mp, and reported in accordance with Articles 13a and 13b;
Amendment 298 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1.1
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.1.1
Vehicle Mission profile (mp)** sub- group (sg)* RDL RDR LHL LHR UDL UDR REL, MUL MUR COL COR RER, LEL, LER 53 0,2508 0,2579 0 0 0,025 0,2511 0 0 0 0 0 54 0,2508 0,2579 0 0 0,025 0,2511 0 0 0 0 0
Amendment 305 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.2 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.2 – paragraph 1
Reporting periods from 2025 to 2029onwards
Amendment 312 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3 – paragraph 1
Amendment 314 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.3 – point 2.3.3
Amendment 319 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 1
CO2(NO) = ∑sg sharesg × MPWsg × (avgCO2sg × (1 - sharesgEHC) + αsg x avgCO2sg × sharesgEHC)
Amendment 320 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 a (new)
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 a (new)
sharesgEHC is the share in subgroup sg of the manufacturer's new heavy duty category N3 vehicles that are permitted to be used in an EHC
Amendment 321 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 b (new)
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 b (new)
αsg is the compensation factor to adjust the effect of the higher payload of a EHC on the manufacturer's trucks, depending on the average in service maximum permissible combination mass, using the weighted value of the result of the following formulae: αsg = 1 + (-3/5*avgGVWsg comb 8x4-30)/100, for 8x4 EHC trucks αsg = 1 + (-3/5*avgGVWsg comb other+19)/100, for other EHC trucks
Amendment 322 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 c (new)
Annex I – point 2 – point 2.7 – paragraph 2 – point 2.7.2 – paragraph 14 c (new)
avgGVWsg comb is the manufacturer- specific average in the country of registration for the in service maximum permissible combination mass (tonnes) for EHC trucks in question in the subgroup sg, when the following condition is met: For the purposes of the calculation of CO2 emissions, a truck covered by this Regulation shall be considered part of an EHC if the truck is in category N3 and the in service maximum permissible mass of the vehicle combination in the country of registration is over 60 tonnes and has been reported in accordance with point (q a) of Part A of Annex IV.
Amendment 324 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point 3.2 – table
Annex I – point 3 – point 3.2 – table
Reference periods applicable to sub-groups The following reporting periods shall be applied as reference periods to vehicle sub-groups: Vehicle sub-group sg Reporting period of the year applicable as reference period 4-UD, 4-RD, 4-LH, 5-RD, 5-LH, 9-RD, 9-LH, 10-RD, 10-LH 2019 1s, 1,2, 3, 11, 12, 16 2020 All others 2025
Amendment 329 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.2 –table
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.2 –table
X = 2025 X= NO X = MCO2 X= MZE vehicle sub-groups, subject sub-groups of sub-groups of sub-groups of transport of to CO2 emissions targets transport of transport of persons vehicles, subject to according to Article 3a goods vehicles, persons zero-emissions vehicle targets persons vehicles, subject to to CO2 emissions targets transport of transport of zero-emissions vehicle targets according to Article 3a goods vehicles, persons according to Article 3b paragraph 1 (a) subject to CO2 vehicles, according to Article 3b emissions subject to CO2 targets emissions according to targets Article 3a according to paragraphs Article 3a 1(b), 1(c) and paragraphs 1(d) and 1(b), 1(c) and paragraph 3 1(d) 4-UD, 4-RD, 4-LH, 5-RD, All vehicle sub- 32-C 31-L2, 32-C32, 31-LF, 31-L1, 31-L2DD, 31-DD,3-LF, 5-LH, 9-RD, 9-LH, 10-RD, groups referred 32-DDC3, 34-C22-DD, 33-LF1, 33-L1DD, 33-L2, 33-DD,5-FE, 39-FE 10-LH to in points 34-C3, 34-DD, 35-FE, 39-FE 33-L2 34-C2, 1.1.1 and 1.1.3. 34-C3, 34-DD,
Amendment 335 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.1 – table
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.1 – table
Amendment 336 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.1 – table
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.1 – table
Amendment 344 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.2 – table
Annex I – point 4 – point 4.3.2 – table
Zero-emission vehicle mandates zevMsg Sub-groups sg Reporting period of the years before 2030 2030 – 2035 – 2039 As from 2034 2040 Urban heavy 31-LF, 31-L1, 31- 0 1080% 100% 100% buses DD, 33-LF, 33- L1, 33-DD, 35- FE, 39-FE, 31-L2, 33-L2
Amendment 356 #
2023/0042(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Part A – point q a (new)
Annex IV – Part A – point q a (new)
(qa) maximum mass for a category N3 truck in an EHC referred to in Annex I, point 2.7.2. in the truck’s country of registration when the truck is coupled to one or more semi-trailers/drawbar trailers;
Amendment 110 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that EU Member States have a full responsibility for proper tax collection and they are entitled to decide on their own tax systems;
Amendment 111 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Highlights that well-functioning tax systems and national tax administrations play a key role in tax collection and that sustainable tax revenue in the Member States´ public budgets is important in the current challenging economic climate;
Amendment 159 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to present an overall evaluation of actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to immediatelywith the aim to ease the burden on businesses by invoking a regulatory moratorium and to delaying those tax acts that would unnecessarily increase costs for businesses already under strain; calls on the Commission to carry out competitiveness checks for new legislative tax proposals, as requested by the European Council for all new proposals on 22 March 2023;
Amendment 162 #
2022/2146(INI)
7. Calls on the Commission to present an overall evaluation of actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to immediately ease the burden on businesses by invoking a regulatory moratorium and delaying those tax acts that would unnecessarily increase costs for businesses already under strain; calls on the Commission to carry out competitiveness checks for new legislative tax proposals, as requested by the European Council for all new proposals on 22 March 2023, and to ensure that the submission of any new proposal, if necessary, is essential for the smooth functioning of the single market ;
Amendment 173 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Takes note of the renewed debate on tax incentives following the US Inflation Reduction Act; calls on the Commission to allow fornalyse experimentation with tax credits; insists, nevertheless, that all decisions should be taken in a coordinated manner to preserve the functioning of the single market;
Amendment 180 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to consider engageing in policies of full expensing for capital investments and to make capital allowance provisions permanent in order to improve real investments and to assist Europe’s competitiveness;
Amendment 208 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Observes that, in addition to coping with a volatile business environment and an increasing number of EU tax directives, companies are focusing their financial and human resources on applying the Pillar Two rules; calls on the Commissioninvites the Commission to assess effectiveness and impact of the Pillar Two rules, namely in the context of expected aims, cost-benefits analysis, fight against tax evasion and avoidance, fair tax competition and higher tax revenue, and thus to give companies breathing space and enough time to prepare for the possible new BEFIT rules;
Amendment 239 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. WelcomNotes the Commission’s plan to work on a BEFIT proposal, expected in the third quarter of 2023, with a view to designing a new and single EU corporate tax rulebook, based on a fair, comprehensive and effective formulary apportionment and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses, which will provide clarity and predictability for companies and the intention to provide clarity and predictability for companies, especially those operating cross-border; stresses that any such proposal must not over-step or undermine agreements reached or discussions ongoing at the global level; reiterates that agreements on corporate tax frameworks are most effective when reached at a global level;
Amendment 241 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to work on a BEFIT proposal, expected in the third quarter of 2023, with a view to designing a new and single EU corporate tax rulebook, based on a fair, comprehensive and effective formulary apportionment and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses, which wil. In this context, calls on the Commission to ensure that the new proposal provides clarity and predictability for companies;
Amendment 6 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that taxation is one of the few areas that remain subject to unanimity voting in Council; stresses that it has become increasingly evident over recent years that stronger coordination in the field of taxation is needed at EU and global levels in the light of economic developments and the new challenges created by digitalisation and globalisation; regrets, in this regard, Hungary’s misuse of its veto right to block the Council negotiations on the Commission proposal of 22 December 2021 for a Council directive on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational groups in the Union (COM(2021)0823);
Amendment 17 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the fact that the current situation oftencould in some cases leads to delays and a lack of progress in the harmonisation and coordination of tax rules across the Union, even though such harmonisation and coordination wcould benefit everyone; notes that some legislative proposals, such as the debt-equity bias reduction allowance (DEBRA) or the Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT), will be key to supporting the competitiveness of European companies;
Amendment 28 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides for two general passerelle clauses that allow the decision-making procedures to be changed in order to adopt measures in Council through qualified majority voting (QMV) in areas that are currently subject to unanimity; regrets the fact that these passerelle clauses have never been used; recalls that activating the passerelle clauses would in any case require unanimity in the European Council and Parliament’s consent;
Amendment 30 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides for two general passerelle clauses that allow the decision-making procedures to be changed in order to adopt measures in Council through qualified majority voting (QMV) in areas that are currently subject to unanimity; regretnotes the fact that these passerelle clauses have never been used; recalls that activating the passerelle clauses would in any case require unanimity in the European Council and Parliament’s consent;
Amendment 36 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 41 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecommendsSuggests further analysis of using the two general passerelle clauses for selected Treaty articles concerning the EU’s competences in the area of taxation; recalls that the Commission communication of 15 January 2019 entitled ‘Towards a more efficient and democratic decision making in EU tax policy’ (COM(2019)0008) and the conclusions of the Conference on the Future of Europe both recommended moving from unanimity voting to QMV on tax matters.
Amendment 166 #
2022/2080(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is deeply disappointed by the failure of finance ministers to adopt the much-needed reform of the Code of Conduct for Business Taxation on 7 December 2021, after several unsuccessful attempts; condemns Hungary and Estonia, in particular, for blocking the reformalls in particular on the member states who continue, blocking the reform to lift their reservations;
Amendment 21 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the EIB eligibility list currently excludes equipment and infrastructure for military use; whereas investments for dual use are not excluded1a; _________________ 1a https://www.eib.org/en/publications/eib- eligibility-excluded-activities-and- excluded-sectors-list
Amendment 54 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the EIB Strategic European Security Initiative (SESI), which will make available up to 6 billion euros by 2027 for dual-use research, RDI, civilian security infrastructure and cutting-edge technology projects;
Amendment 58 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Amendment 59 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. Regrets the exclusion of ammunition, weapons, equipment and infrastructure for military use from the list of eligible investments, given that investment in these areas is critical in order to sustain European security; considers that any military product is not unethical in and of itself and that its use should always be aligned with international law; calls on the EIB to include investments in defence products and activities in its eligibility list;
Amendment 67 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the fact that in 2022, the EIB provided financing amounting to a total investment of EUR 16.35 billion for SMEs and mid-caps; calls on the EIB to reflect on ways to facilitate its support to SME's further, especially for smaller financing projects;
Amendment 95 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Emphasises the importance of investing in low carbon energy sources such as hydrogen, CCS and nuclear energy; welcomes in this regard the EIB's contribution to REPowerEU in the form of an additional 30 billion euros in investments; highlights that nuclear energy is free of CO2 emissions and taxonomy-aligned; welcomes in this regard the EIB's activities in this field and encourages the bank to step up its efforts;
Amendment 117 #
2022/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Considers that the EIB should contribute to the EU’s objective of enhancing its strategic autonomy; welcomes in this regard the launch of the Global Gateway Fund, which will principally support investments in infrastructure and SME's;
Amendment 76 #
2022/2051(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the numerousNotes the impediments to essentialsome EU tax initiatives over the past decades; calls for gradual change that would allow QMV infurther analysis of certain tax questions;
Amendment 140 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for better accessibility and connectivity between urban, peri-urban and rural areas, as well as multimodal passenger hubs, and further calls for unhindered access to smart, sustainable and affordable transport to be guaranteed for all;
Amendment 148 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission to propose a multimodal package in order to ensure an integrated approach of transport services, which includes an integrated door-to-door mobility modes for passengers and freight; stresses that such package should include safety control measures and training requirements for transport operators;
Amendment 180 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses its concern at the shortcomings in the regulation of micro- mobility in many Member States, as it does not facilitate this type of transportation and poses risks for people’s safety; invites the Commission, in this context, to collaborate with the Member States to draw up common road-safety guidelines and recommendations for micro-mobility such as speed limits, helmet requirements, safety standards for cycling infrastructure or training; encourages the Member States to proceed with the adaptation of their national legislation and to launch information campaigns and integrated mobility solutions including integrated ticketing;
Amendment 234 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that border cities should have the capacity to provide efficient and seamless cross-border daily transport while addressing missing links and bottlenecks, and ensuring better and more sustainable connectivity between European capitals and major cities; highlights, in this regard, that high-speed train services should be better deployed, particularly in the areas where such services are currently lacking;
Amendment 287 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights that AI and digitalisation improve efficiency, safety and affordability, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions; stresses that AI applied to urban transport should serve the goals of traffic congestion relief, major service predictability and customer satisfaction;
Amendment 344 #
2022/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Urges the Commission and the Member States to increase research and investments in smart mobility, upskilling and reskilling, in order to contribute to the development of innovative transport solutions, low-emissions mobility solutions, modal shift and alternative fuels.
Amendment 6 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
— having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 March 2020 on New Industrial Strategy for Europe,
Amendment 9 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the new Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy sets the milestone of doubling high-speed rail traffic by 2030; and of tripling high-speed rail traffic by 2050;
Amendment 33 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 - point c
Paragraph 2 - point c
(c) improving the efficiency and ensuring high quality of transport, while services, while offering sufficient capacity and reducing travel times andt appropriate ticket prices;
Amendment 39 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point d
Paragraph 2 – point d
d) ensuring fair competition among rail operators and betweencomplementarity of different modes of transport;
Amendment 41 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 - point e
Paragraph 2 - point e
(e) ensuring the same level of protection of passengers’ rights in various forms of transport, guaranteeing equal access for all and fostering the attractiveness of rail transport for young people;
Amendment 47 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the acceleration of the work to ensure the full implementation of the 4th Railway Package and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability; regrets however the non-alignment with the decoupling imperative provided for by the fourth railway package in certain Member States;
Amendment 48 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Insists on the necessity to ensure appropriate implementation of the guarantee of equal treatment for incumbent operators and new entrants in the access to the infrastructure;
Amendment 51 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the full deployment of the ERTMS will help to create a digital single European railway area, ensuring the further development of safe, secure fast and efficient rail transport services for long-distance and cross-border connections;
Amendment 53 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that boosting long- distance rail transport must also improve the connection of regional, urban and peripheral areas to TEN-T, although this cannot be done without the need to accelerate the construction of new lines as defined in the TEN-T and without the need to adequately improve the performance of existing lines;
Amendment 62 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to speed up the roll-ouUnion-wide deployment of the ERTMS in the revision of the TEN-T Regulation;
Amendment 68 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Insists on the need to tend towards regulatory stability in technical specifications for interoperability in order to provide a sufficient degree of legal predictability to railway undertakings;
Amendment 69 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the need to ensure quick sufficient and efficient financing and funding to support the investments; calls for a clear and predictable financial framework on the EU level which would go beyond the current multi-annual financial framework in order to underpin the targets set for TEN-T rail infrastructure.
Amendment 70 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the need to ensure quick and efficient financing to support the investments, including the involvement of the competent authorities to require and compensate public services to encourage the earliest possible deployment of ERTMS OBUs and other TSI standards;
Amendment 79 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Commends the role of the European Union Agency of Railways, which is one of the pillars of the European Union's rail policy and which carries out its tasks despite insufficient financial means;
Amendment 81 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the timely completion of the multimodal, seamless TEN-T core network corridors by 2030 is imperative and must involve the elimination of bottlenecks and missing links and the completion of cross-border sections; supports the planned high-speed rail connections in the extended core network, to be realised by 2040. Believes that priority investments should be also directed to the development of long distance, cross-border high speed rail connections, especially in areas where there is, currently, a lack of high speed rail infrastructure;
Amendment 82 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the timely completion of the multimodal, seamless TEN-T core network corridors by 2030 is imperative and must involve the elimination of bottlenecks and missing links and the completion of cross-border sections; supports the planned high-speed rail connections in the extended core network, to be realised by 2040; new high- speed lines in particular are an effective tool for increasing the competitiveness of rail transport and meeting wider EU objectives;
Amendment 97 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the promising alternatives offered by hydrogen and battery trains when electrification of a rail section is not possible for reasons of cost efficiency;
Amendment 100 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the Commission’s focus on the completion of first/last mile multimodal hubs in cities with more than 100 000 inhabitanturban nodes, thereby strengthening rail connectivity with air, sea and road transport;
Amendment 104 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the clarification of State aid rules on the public funding of new and environmentally friendly interoperable rolling stock for cross-border services in the revised Railway Guidelinesand related service facilities and rail infrastructure in the revised Railway Guidelines; available instruments for financing such vehicles and the implementation of the Luxembourg Protocol;
Amendment 107 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the clarification and simplification of State aid rules on the public funding of interoperable rolling stock for cross-border services in the revised Railway Guidelines;
Amendment 114 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises the need forto ensure clear interoperable standards and further investments in rolling stocknew and environmentally friendly rolling stock related service facilities and railway infrastructure;
Amendment 117 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises the need for clear interoperable standardpecifications and further investments in rolling stock;
Amendment 120 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for the support of SMEs and micro-businesses by fostering innovative initiatives and highlights the importance of taking into consideration local, regional and national needs, in order to strengthen and stimulate the business environment for SMEs and to link it with the new industrial policy at EU level;
Amendment 127 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the importance of a clear European skills strategy to remove the persistence of technical and operational barriers which hinder cross-border traffic and increase costs and to train “go- everywhere” train drivers;
Amendment 128 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the relevance of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe in supportsing the reskilling and upskilling of train drivers, but stresses the importance of ensuring occuand to promote encouragement and in promoting and encouraging motivation in education and training, partional levecularly in new digital skills, and equal opportunities for all;
Amendment 134 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Insists on the importance of providing support to SMEs for upskilling the sector’s workforce with a specific focus on digital skills and innovative technologies;
Amendment 136 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of ensuring improved use of the network and calls for measures to smooth passenger flow, including establishing transit and terminal nodes along high-speed routesbackbone routes. On lines with mixed traffic, these steps require close cooperation in the development of passenger and freight measures to prevent bottlenecks and congestion that undermine the performance of the whole network;
Amendment 138 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of ensuring improved use of the network, especially along the TEN-T, and calls for measures to smooth passenger flow, and to enhance the attractiveness of Night Trains, including establishing transit and terminal nodes along high-speed routes;
Amendment 147 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights the role of digitalisation and better and timely coordination, in particular for of infrastructure administrators with carriers to better coordinate construction works that have a major impact on operations and reliability in cross-border rail traffic;
Amendment 150 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights the role of digitalisation, cybersecurity and better coordination, in particular for cross-border rail traffic;
Amendment 151 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Emphasises that track access charging is the relevant revenue stream for Infrastructure Managers and it has to be economically viable for the Infrastructure Managers and provide the possibility to steer market demand.
Amendment 152 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines the usefulness of the rail connectivity index for assessing the state of the network and targeting investments according to objective criteria;
Amendment 155 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the Commission’s upcoming plans to publish guidelines for setting track access charges and to promote pilot projects to explore the impact of reduced track access charges on the set-up of cross-border services;
Amendment 161 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the importance of setting fair and appropriate track access pricing for all operators, while ensuring that infrastructure networks are adequately funded;
Amendment 168 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Acknowledges that making long- distance rail passenger services more attractive requires more accessible smart ticketing to facilitate multimodal journey planning and simplify ticketing procedures through digital services and appropriate protection for passengers in the event of delays or missed connections for single options and through tickets, ensuring, as a minimum, journey continuation;
Amendment 173 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Notes that the level of data sharing between incumbent railway undertakings and new entrants remains insufficient to reach an optimal functioning of a liberalised railway system, particularly in terms of ticketing;
Amendment 177 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Takes note of the Commission’s upcoming proposal for a regulation on multimodal digital mobility services to enhance data exchange. Highlights the need for the Commission, when proposing regulations, to ensure that consumers are sufficiently protected when purchasing travel documents via multimodal and other platforms. The proposal should enhance data exchange between the carriers and the provider of the multimodal digital service so that in the event of an emergency, the carrier can communicate directly with the consumer or compensate him or her directly and facilitate the conclusion of fair commercial agreements;
Amendment 182 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Takes note of the Commission’s upcoming proposal for a regulation on multimodal digital mobility services to enhance data exchange and facilitate the conclusion of fair commercial agreements;.
Amendment 183 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Considers that journey continuation is a key factor in passengers’ choice of the modes of transport to use; welcomes the upcoming EC proposal on multimodal digital mobility services (MDMS) with the aim to further enhance travel data access, availability and exchange;
Amendment 184 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Highlights the importance of seamless user experience when searching, selecting, and buying railway services. Having this in mind, sector-based solutions should be at first considered and promoted to boost multimodal ticketing;
Amendment 189 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Highlights the need for a comprehensive approach with clear implementation milestones to achieve easier access to multimodal connections, based on interoperable solutions that are fit for purpose;
Amendment 192 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. WelcomesCalls on the Commission’s willingness to to continue monitoring compliance with the new Rail Passengers’ Rights Regulation;
Amendment 197 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that all possible avenues should be explored to ensure a level playing field with other transport modes, including the possibility of an EU-wide VAT exemption for international train services, and the revision and simplification of State aid and of the related notification obligation;
Amendment 209 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that public service contracts can play a decisive role ine need to supporting the continuity of services and connections to interesting destinations, such as tourist and historical destinations, by providing rail services that help to maintain a dense network of railway links, including to less attractive destinations;
Amendment 210 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that public service contracts can play a decisive role in supporting the continuity of services andensuring cross-border services for European citizens and improve connections to interesting destinations, such as tourist and historical destinations, by providing rail services that help to maintain a dense network of railway links, including to less attractive destinations;
Amendment 214 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that public service obligations can promote the use of rail, including in long-distance passenger transport, in particular in the case of market failures due to insufficient high- speed and high-capacity infrastructure in cross-border and last- mile routes, perhaps in combination with other profitable segments of the network;
Amendment 217 #
2022/2022(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission and Member States to sustain the momentum of the 2021 European Year of Rail in the 2022 European Year of Youth, by encouraging young people to travel by train and attracting them to professions in the rail sector, which is facing skill shortages driven by innovation and digitalisation;
Amendment 35 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that the strategy should further enhance the integrity of the single market with regards to tourism and transport sectors; Considers essential to interlink the industrial strategy with further deepening and strengthening of the single market and calls therefore for full implementation of the Services Directive which is instrumental also for areas such as transport and tourism; Calls on the new industrial strategy for Europe to be aligned with related political ambitions such as the European Green Deal, digitalization, and improving multimodality; Believes that Europe must now become the accelerator and enable the change and innovation and that the industrial policy we provide must help to make this ambition a reality;
Amendment 54 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to support SMEs and micro-businesses (including artisans) in the tourism sector, by fostering innovative initiatives, simplifying bureaucracy and encouraging education and training (mainly on new digital skills), to stimulate new tourism offerings in terms of destinations and experiences. Emphasises the need to lower significantly the administrative burden on SMEs and to make the EU regulatory framework better adapted to this end; invites the Commission and the Member States to further include and support measures enhancing the digitalisation;
Amendment 63 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the digital transition is one of the key horizontal EU priorities, which will help to boost competitiveness of the EU business in transport and tourism sectors and further strengthen their resilience to economic or other type of crisis;
Amendment 64 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Believes that the strategy should further provide socio-economic prosperity and new job opportunities; Stresses that Europe needs to make full use of its capacities, to encourage manufacturing in key sectors and support upskilling of workers in those fields where jobs are likely to be obsolete due to the transition;
Amendment 85 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Supports broader automation in the transport sector with the aim to make it more efficient, sustainable and competitive;
Amendment 86 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to support the uptake of zero-emission vehicles, encourage using sustainable alternative solutions available to the public and businesses, supporting digitalisation and automation improving connectivity and access in the context of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by encouraging the use of low and zero - emission means of transport;
Amendment 88 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Believes that the green and digital transition are essential to safeguard the automotive sector's competitiveness and calls on the Commission to pursue the ambition to make Europe a global leader in sustainable mobility, by supporting incentives such as battery production;
Amendment 89 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Supports developing shared mobility adapted to each place individually and contribute to the growth of currently known forms of shared mobility, such as car sharing, scooter or bike sharing but will also initiate new ways of transport business models and the development of digitalization;
Amendment 90 #
2022/2008(INI)
4e. Recalls the need for comprehensive smart tourism strategies for remote regions and the need to stimulate new tourism opportunities;
Amendment 95 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to facilitate multimodal journey planning and ticketingsimplify ticketing procedures through digital services while better regulating the activity of online booking platforms and booking platform intermediaries; calls for the EU framework for short-term rentals to be strengthened and for new policies to be implemented with a view to enhancing transparency;
Amendment 101 #
2022/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Supports broader innovative initiatives and encourage education in digital skills;
Amendment 86 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Directive applies to crypto- assets service providers regulated by and authorised under Regulation XXX and to crypto-asset operators that are not. Both are referred to as reporting crypto-asset service providers as they are required to report under this Directive. The general understanding of what constitutes crypto- assets is very broad and includes those crypto-assets that have been issued in a decentralised manner, as well as stablecoins, and certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Crypto-assets that are used for payment or investment purposes afall under the scope of Regulation XXX should be considered reportable under this Directive. Therefore, reporting crypto-asset service providers should consider on a case-by- case basis whether crypto-assets can be used for payment and investment purposes, taking into account the exemptions provided in Regulation XXX, in particular in relation to a limited network and certain utility tokens..
Amendment 87 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Directive applies to crypto- assets service providers regulated by and authorised under Regulation XXX and to crypto-asset operators that are not. Both are referred to as reporting crypto-asset service providers as they are required to report under this Directive. The general understanding of what constitutes crypto- assets is very broad and includes those crypto-assets that have been issued in a decentralised manner, as well as stablecoins, including e-money tokens as defined in Regulation XXX, and certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Crypto-assets that are used for payment or investment purposes are reportable under this Directive. Therefore, reporting crypto-asset service providers should consider on a case-by-case basis whether crypto-assets can be used for payment and investment purposes, taking into account the exemptions provided in Regulation XXX, in particular in relation to a limited network and certain utility tokens..
Amendment 89 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 90 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to foster administrative cooperation in this field with non-Union jurisdictions, crypto-asset operators that are situated in non-Union jurisdictions and provide services to EU crypto-asset users, such as NFT service-providers or operators providing services on a reverse- solicitation basis, should be allowed to solely report information on crypto-asset users resident in the Union to the tax authorities of a non-Union jurisdiction insofar as the reported information is correspondent to the information set out in this Directive and insofar as there is an effective exchange of information between the non-Union jurisdiction and a Member State. Crypto-asset service providers authorised under Regulation XXX could be exempt from reporting such information in the Member States where it is holding the authorisation if the correspondent reporting takes place in a non-Union Jurisdiction and insofar as there is an effective qualifying competent authority agreement in place. The qualified non-Union jurisdiction would in turn communicate such information to the tax administrations of those Member States where crypto-asset users are resident. Where appropriate, that mechanism should be enabled to prevent correspondent information from being reported and transmitted more than once.
Amendment 100 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The Tax Identification Number (‘TIN’) is essential for Member States to match information received with data present in national databases. It increases Member States’ capability of identifying the relevant taxpayers and correctly assessing the related taxes. Therefore, it is important that Member States require that TIN is indicated in the context of exchanges related to financial accounts, advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing agreements, country-by-country reports, reportable cross-border arrangements, and information on sellers on digital platforms and crypto-assets. However, when the TIN is not available, such an obligation may not be fulfilled by the competent authorities of Member States .
Amendment 105 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35 a (new)
Recital 35 a (new)
(35a) Information acquired through the reporting or the exchange of information under Directive 2011/16/EU should be effectively used by each Member State. Therefore, a mechanism ensuring effective use, including risk analysis of the data, should be introduced in each Member State.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) In order to ensure compliance witha proper enforcement of the rules under theis Directive 2011/16/EU, Member States should lay down the rules on penalties, and other compliance measures that should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Each Member State should apply those rules in accordance with their national laws and the provisions set forth in this Directpplicable to infringements of national provisions on mandatory exchange of information reported by crypto-asset service providers, that should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 113 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
Amendment 116 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
Recital 41
Amendment 119 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) Following the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-694/20, Directive 2011/16/EU should be amended in such a manner that its provisions do not have the effect of requiring a lawyer acting as an intermediary, where he or she is exempt from the reporting obligation, on account of the legal professional privilege by which he or she is bound, to notify any other intermediary who is not his or her client of that intermediary’s reporting obligations while preserving the obligation of intermediaries to notify without delay his or her client of his or her reporting obligations.
Amendment 120 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44 a (new)
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) International data exchange for tax purposes constitutes a necessary instrument to fight tax fraud in a globalized world. Given that there is an EU-wide standard for personal data protection, uniform rules regarding exchanges with third countries and ensuring data protection in international exchanges of tax information, both by the transferring Member States and by the receiving jurisdiction, should be established.
Amendment 154 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ab – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 8ab – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
(3a) in Article 8ab, paragraph 5, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "5. Each Member State may take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement where the reporting obligation would breach the legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require any intermediaries to notify, without delay, any othery that has been granted a waiver to notify, without delay, his or her client, if such client is an intermediary or, if there is no such intermediary, if such client is the relevant taxpayer, of their reporting obligations under paragraph 6. " Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02011L0016-20230101)
Amendment 161 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8ad – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall not have access to information referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article.
Amendment 164 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 6
Article 8ad – paragraph 6
Amendment 165 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 167 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 168 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 8ad – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 169 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 8
Article 8ad – paragraph 8
Amendment 170 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 9
Article 8ad – paragraph 9
Amendment 182 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. The competent authority of each Member State shall put in place an effective mechanism to ensure the assessmentuse of data acquired through the reporting or the exchange of information under Articles 8 to 8ad within the scope of this Directive as well as to put in place procedures for the systematic risk analysis of the data.;
Amendment 185 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 21 – paragraph 5a – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 5a – subparagraph 2
The competent authorities of all Member States shall have access to the information recorded in that directory. The Commission shall alsoOn information communicated according to Article 8ad(2) and (3), the competent authority of a Member State shall, however, have access to theonly to information recorded in that directory for the purposes of complying wiconcerning persons resident in that Member State. The Commission shall also have access to the its obligations under this Dnformation recorded in that directiveory, however with the limitations set out in Article 8a(8), Article 8ab(17) and Article 8ad(8), and only for the purpose of collecting statistics. The necessary practical arrangements shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 191 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 23 – paragraph 3
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment ofassess the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information referred to in Articles 8 to 8ad as well as the practical results achieved, including in combatting tax evasion and tax avoidance, and shall inform the Commission once a year. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the form and the conditions of communication for that yearly assessment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2). The Commission shall also examine and evaluate the compliance cost that can result from a possible over-reporting situation.
Amendment 197 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
(11a) In Article 24, the following paragraphs 2a and 2b are added: "Article 24 Exchange of information with third countries 2a. The processing of personal data for the purposes of the exchange of tax relevant information with third countries, based on an international agreement, shall be deemed of public interest under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2b. In case of an automatic exchange, Member States shall ensure that the level of protection of natural persons guaranteed by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 is not undermined. "
Amendment 198 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – title
Article 25a – title
Article 25a Penalties and other compliance measures
Amendment 200 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 1
Article 25a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and concerning Article 8(3a), Articles 8aa to 8ad and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that they are implemented and enforced. Penalties and compliance measures provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 203 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 25a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member states shall introduce a temporary penalty reduction regime for SMEs.
Amendment 204 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 2
Article 25a – paragraph 2
Amendment 207 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 3
Article 25a – paragraph 3
Amendment 224 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 4
Article 25a – paragraph 4
Amendment 228 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 5
Article 25a – paragraph 5
Amendment 229 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 6
Article 25a – paragraph 6
Amendment 235 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 27c – paragraph 1
Article 27c – paragraph 1
For taxable periods starting on or after 1 January 2026, Member States shall ensure that the TIN of reported individuals or entities issued by the Member State of residence, where available, is included in the communication of the information referred to in Article 8(1) and (3a), Article 8a(6), Article 8aa(3), Article 8ab(14), Article 8ac(2) and Article 8ad(3). The TIN shall be provided even when it is not specifically required by those Articles.
Amendment 246 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section II – point B a (new)
Annex VI – Section II – point B a (new)
Ba. Notwithstanding subparagraph A(1), the place of birth is not required to be reported unless the Reporting Crypto- Asset Service Provider is otherwise required to obtain and report it under domestic law.
Amendment 247 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section II – point C
Annex VI – Section II – point C
C. The information listed in paragraph 3 shall be reported by 31 January0 September of the calendar year following the year to which the information relates. The first information shall be reported for the relevant calendar year or other appropriate reporting period as from 1 January 2026.
Amendment 254 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point B – subparagraph 2
Annex VI – Section IV – point B – subparagraph 2
Amendment 256 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point B – point 4
Annex VI – Section IV – point B – point 4
4. ‘Crypto-Asset Services’ means Crypto-Asset Services as defined in Regulation XXX including staking and lending.
Amendment 257 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point C – point 4
Annex VI – Section IV – point C – point 4
4. ‘Reportable Retail Payment Transaction’ means a Transfer of Reportable Crypto-Assets in consideration of goods or services for a value exceeding EURUSD 50 000 (or the equivalent amount in any other currency).
Amendment 261 #
Amendment 105 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) To facilitate the automation of the reporting process for both taxable persons and tax administrations, the transactions to be reported to tax administrations should be documented electronically. The use of electronic invoicing should become the default system for issuing invoices. Nevertheless, Member States should be allowed to authorise other means for domestic supplies. The issuance of electronic invoices by the supplier and its transmission to the customer should not be conditional on a prior authorisation or verification by the tax administration.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 124 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Several Member States have put in place divergent reporting requirements for transactions within their territories, leading to significant administrative burdens for taxable persons which operate in different Member States, as they need to adapt their accounting systems to comply with those requirements. In order to avoid the costs derived from such divergence, the systems implemented in Member States to report supplies of goods and services for consideration between taxable persons within their territory should comply with the same features of the system implemented for intra-Community transactions. Member States should provide for the electronic means for the transmission of the information and, as is the case for intra- Community transactions, it should be possible for the taxable person to submit the data in accordance with the European standard laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1870, even though the relevant Member State could provide for additional means to transmit the data. The data should be allowed to be sent by the taxable person directly or by a third party on that person’s behalf.
Amendment 127 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Member States should not be obliged to implement a digital reporting requirement for supplies of goods and services for consideration between taxable persons within their territory. However, if they are to implement such a requirement in the future, they should align it with the digital reporting requirements for intra- Community transactions. Member States which already have a reporting system for these transactions in place should adapt such systems to ensure that the data are reported in accordance with the digital reporting requirements for intra- Community transactions.
Amendment 129 #
2022/0407(CNS)
(19) In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the intra-Community digital reporting requirements, the Commission should prepare an assessment report evaluating the impact of intra- Community digital reporting requirements on the reduction of the VAT gap and in the implementation and compliance costs for taxable persons and tax administrations, in order to verify whether the system has achieved its objectives or needs further adjustments or any extension to domestic transactions.
Amendment 131 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Member States should be able to continue to implement other measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent evasion. However, they should not be able to impose additional reporting obligations on the transactions that are covered by the digital reporting requirements.
Amendment 162 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Amendment 163 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 232
Article 232
(9) Article 232 is deleted;replaced by the following: 1.The use of an electronic invoice shall be subject to acceptance by the recipient. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may provide that the use of electronic invoices issued by taxable persons established within their territory shall not be subject to the acceptance of the recipient established in their territory.’
Amendment 203 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 218
Article 218
For the purposes of this Directive, invoices shall be issued in a structured electronic format. However, Member States may accept documents on paper or other formats as invoices for transactions not subject to the reporting obligations laid down in Title XI Chapter 6. Member States shall allow for the issuance of electronic invoices which comply with the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of its syntaxes pursuant to Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The issuance of electronic invoices by taxable persons and their transmission shall not be subject to a prior mandatory authorisation or verification by the tax authorities.;
Amendment 224 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/122/EC
Article 271a – paragraph 1
Article 271a – paragraph 1
1. Member States may require that taxable persons identified for VAT purposes in their territory send electronically to their tax authorities data on the supplies of goods and services made for consideration to other taxable persons within their territory and on the supplies of goods and services for consideration made to them by other taxable persons.
Amendment 225 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 2006/112/EC
Article 271a – paragraph 2
Amendment 226 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 271b – paragraph 1
Article 271b – paragraph 1
Amendment 229 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 271b – paragraph 2
Article 271b – paragraph 2
Amendment 230 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 2006/112/EC
By 31 March 2033 at the latest the Commission shall, based on the information provided by Member States, present to the Council a report on the functioning of the domesticintra-Community reporting requirements set out in this SectionChapter. In that report, the Commission shall assess the need for further harmonisation measures, namely in relation to the domestic reporting requirements, and shall if deemed necessary, make an appropriate proposal for such measures.;
Amendment 232 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 273 – paragraph 2
Article 273 – paragraph 2
Amendment 5 #
2022/0404(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2009/65/EU
Article 52 – paragraph 1 − subparagraph 2
Article 52 – paragraph 1 − subparagraph 2
The risk exposure to a counterparty of the UCITS in a derivative or repurchase agreement transaction that is not centrally cleared through a CCP authorised in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 or recognised in accordance with Article 25 of that Regulation, shall not exceed either:;
Amendment 7 #
2022/0404(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2
Article 2
Articles 74, 76, 81, 100 and 104 Directive 2013/36/EU
[...] d e [...] l e t e d
Amendment 218 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To ensure that clients are aware of their options and can take an informed decision as where to clear their derivative contracts, clearing members and clients that provide clearing services in both Union and recognised third-country CCPs should inform their clients about the option to clear a derivative contract in a Union CCP so that clearing in those services identified as of substantial systemic importance is reduced in Tier 2 CCPs in order to ensure the financial stability of the Union. Clearing members must respect the wishes of the clients on where to clear the clients' derivatives.
Amendment 238 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) To mitigate potential risks for the financial stability of the Union, or of one or more of its Member States, CCPs and clearing houses should not be allowed to be clearing members of other CCPs nor should CCPs be able to accept to have other CCPs as clearing members or indirect clearing members. This exclusion should not affect interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored-memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs.
Amendment 243 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 a (new)
Recital 50 a (new)
(50a) (51) To further enhance the attractiveness of CCPs established in the Union, the opening hours of TARGET2 should be extended beyond the current constraints. This will allow clearing members established in the Union to fulfil their margin obligations in EUR, lowering the current dependency on USD for margin calls occurring beyond the closing time of TARGET2.
Amendment 255 #
Amendment 446 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e – introductory part
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7
Article 25 – paragraph 7
(e) the following paragraphs 7a, 7b, 7c and 7cd are added:
Amendment 447 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
7a. Where ESMA has not yet determined the tiering of a CCP or where ESMA has determined that all or some CCPs in a relevant third country are Tier 1 CCPs, the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 7 shall take into account the risk the provision of clearing services by those CCPs entails and shall specify:
Amendment 448 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
(b) exceptionally, the mechanism for the exchange of information on a quarterly basis requiring detailed information covering the aspects referred to in paragraph 2a and in particular information on significant changes to risk models and parameters, extension of CCP activities and services and changes in the client account structure, with the aim to detect if a CCP is potentially close to becoming or is potentially likely to become systemically importantmonitor and detect risks for the financial stability of the Union or one or more of its Member States.
Amendment 449 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3 – point c (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3 – point c (new)
(c a) the mechanism for prompt notification to ESMA by the third-country competent authority where a third- country CCP intends to extend and reduce its activities and services;
Amendment 451 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point f
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point f
(f) the procedures for third-country authorities to assure the effective enforcement of decisions adopted by ESMA in accordance with Articles 25f, 25k(1), point i, 25j, 25k(1)(b), 25l, 25m and 25p;
Amendment 452 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e
(e) the procedures for third-country authorities to promptly inform ESMA of the following with a focus on aspects relevant for the Union or one or more of its Member Stcooperate with ESMA when drawing up recovery plans and any subsequent changes to such plans and the procedures for third-country authorities to cooperate with ESMA when recovery plans are activates:d
Amendment 454 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i
Amendment 455 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i i
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i i
(ii) if a Tier 2 CCP intends to activate its recovery plan orthe procedures for third countries to promptly inform ESMA where the third- country authorities have determined that there are indications of an emerging crisis situation that could affect the operations of that CCP, in particular, its ability to provide clearing services or where the third-country authorities envisage to take a resolution action in the near future.
Amendment 456 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point d
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point d
(e a) 7d. Where ESMA has determined that at least one CCP in a relevant third country is a Tier 2 CCP, ESMA shall establish effective cooperation arrangements with the relevant resolution authority of that third country. The cooperation arrangements shall specify in relation to those Tier 2 CCPs at least the following: (a) the procedures for the third-country resolution authority to consult ESMA when drawing resolution plans and any subsequent material changes to such plans; (b) the procedures for the third-country resolution authority to inform ESMA when the resolution plan is activated and when the third-country resolution authority intends to deviate from the resolution plan.’;
Amendment 457 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25a
Article 25a
(21 a) Article 25a is replaced by the following: "Article 25a Comparable compliance 1. A CCP referred to in Article 25(2b) may submit a reasoned request that ESMA assesses whether in its compliance with the applicable third-country framework, taking into account the provisions of the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 25(6), that CCP may be deemed to satisfy compliance with the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V. ESMA shall immediately transmit the request to the third-country CCP college. 2. The reasoned request referred to in paragraph 1 shall provide the factual basis for a finding of comparability and the reasons why compliance with the requirements applicable in the third country satisfies the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V. 3. The Commission, in order to ensure that the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 effectively reflects the regulatory objectives of the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V and the Union's interests as a whole, shall adopt a delegated act specifying the following: (a) the minimum elements to be assessed for the purposes of paragraph 1of this Article; (b) the modalities and conditions to carry out the assessment. The Commission shall adopt the delegated act referred to in the first subparagraphbe submitted either within the deadline set by ESMA in the notification informing the third-country CCP that it is not considered to be a Tier 1 CCP or at any moment after a third- country CCP has been recognised by ESMA as a Tier 2 CCP in accordance with Article 25(2b). 3. The reasoned request referred to in paragraph 1 shall: (a) specify the requirements for which the Tier 2 CCP requests comparable compliance; (b) provide the factual basis for a finding of comparability and the reasons why compliance with the requirements applicable in the third country satisfies the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V; (c) specify the way in which the Tier 2 CCP complies with any conditions set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 25(6). (d) a statement from its competent authority confirming that the Tier 2 CCP is of good repute and standing; and (e) where necessary, with regard to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Title V of this Regulation, a translation of the relevant applicable third-country framework into a language commonly used in finance. 4. ESMA shall assess, within 30 working days of receipt of a reasoned request submitted in accordance with paragraph 1, whether that reasoned request is complete. ESMA shall set a deadline by which the Tier 2 CCP has to provide additional information where the request is incomplete. 5. ESMA shall assess whether the Tier 2 CCP’s compliance with the applicable third-country framework, following an outcomes-based and risk-based approach, is comparable to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V of this Regulation. ESMA shall also take into account the supervisory outcomes achieved by the relevant third-country competent authority, as well as the level and depth of cooperation by the relevant third-country competent authority with ESMA. 6. ESMA shall decide whether to grant comparable compliance for the requirements included in the reasoned request within 90 working days from the receipt of a complete reasoned request submitted in accordance with paragraph 4. 7. ESMA may postpone that decision where the reasoned request or the additional information referred to in paragraph 4 are not submitted in time and the assessment of that request could, as a result, delay ESMA’s decision on the recognition of the third-country CCP or the review of its recognition. 8. A Tier 2 CCP for which ESMA has not granted comparable compliance for one or more requirements may not submit a new reasoned request as referred to in paragraph 1 regarding those requirements, unless there has been a relevant change to the applicable third- country framework or to the way in which that CCP complies with that framework. 9. A Tier 2 CCP that has been granted comparable compliance shall notify ESMA of any change to its applicable third-country framework, to the way in which it complies with the applicable third-country framework and to its internal rules and procedures. ESMA shall inform the Commission of those notifications. 10. Where ESMA has granted comparable compliance to a Tier 2 CCP, ESMA shall review the decision on a regular basis. 11. ESMA shall withdraw comparable compliance from a Tier 2 CCP where ESMA finds that the CCP’s compliance with the applicable thirdcountry framework, following an outcomes-based and risk-based approach, is no longer comparable to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V of this Regulation. ESMA shall also take into accordance with Article 82 by 2 January 2021. unt the supervisory outcomes achieved by the relevant third-country competent authority, as well as the level and depth of cooperation by the relevant third-country competent authority with ESMA.’ " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 458 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25f
Article 25f
(21 b) Article 25f is replaced by the following: " Article 25f Request for information 1. ESMA may by simple request or by decision require recognised CCPs and related third parties to whom those CCPs have outsourced operational functions or activities to provide all necessary information to enable ESMA to carry out its duties under this Regulation. 2. WThen sending a simple request for information information referred to in paragraph 1 may be of a periodic or one- off nature. 3. When requiring that information is provided under paragraph 1, ESMA shall indicate all of the following: (a) the reference to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) the purpose of the request; (c) the information required; (d) the time limit to provide the information; (e) inform the person from whom the information is requested that there is no obligation to provide the information but that in the case of a voluntary reply to the request the information provided must not be incorrect or misleading; (f) the fine provided for in Article 25j in conjunction with point (a) of Section V of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading. 3. When requiring that information is provided under paragraph 1 by decision, ESMA shall indicate all of the following: (a) the reference to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) the purpose of the request; (c) the information required; (d) the time limit to provide the informationwhere the information is of a periodic nature, the periodicity at which the information should be provided; (ef) the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 25k where the production of the required information is incomplete; (f(g) the fine provided for in Article 25j in conjunction with point (a) of Section V of Annex III, for failing to provide the required information or where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading; and (g) the right to appeal the decision before ESMA's Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘Court of Justice’) in accordance with Articles 60 and 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 4. The persons referred to in paragraph 1 or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading. 5. ESMA shall, without delay, send a copy of the simple request or of its decisionrequest to the relevant third-country competent authority where the persons referred to in paragraph 1 concerned by the request for information are domiciled or established. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 459 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25fa (new)
Article 25fa (new)
Amendment 461 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 26
Article 26
1. A CCP shall have robust governance arrangements, which include a clear organisational structure with well- defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which it is or might be exposed, and adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures. AWithout prejudice to interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored-memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs, a CCP shall not be or become a clearing member, a client, or establish indirect clearing arrangements with a clearing member with the aim to undertake clearing activities at a CCP.;
Amendment 463 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 29 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 29 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 37
Article 37
1. A CCP shall establish, where relevant per type of product cleared, the categories of admissible clearing members and the admission criteria, upon the advice of the risk committee pursuant to Article 28(3). Such criteria shall be non- discriminatory, transparent and objective so as to ensure fair and open access to the CCP and shall ensure that clearing members have sufficient financial resources and operational capacity to meet the obligations arising from participation in a CCP. Criteria that restrict access shall be permitted only to the extent that their objective is to control the risk for the CCP. TWithout prejudice to interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored- memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs, the criteria shall ensure that CCPs or clearing houses cannot be clearing members, directly or indirectly, of the CCP.;
Amendment 470 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 30 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 30 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 38 – paragraph 7
Article 38 – paragraph 7
(a a) "7. A CCP shall provide its clearing members with information on the initial margin models it uses. That information shall: (a) clearly explain the design of the initial margin models and how ithey operates; (b) clearly describe the key assumptions and limitations of the initial margin model and the circumstances under which those assumptions are no longer valid; (c) be documented. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 482 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 46 – paragraph 1
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. A CCP shall accept highly liquid collateral with minimal credit and market risk to cover its initial and ongoing exposure to its clearing members. A CCP may accept public guarantees or public bank or uncollateralised commercial bank guarantees, provided that they are unconditionally available upon request within the liquidation period referred to in Article 41. Where bank guarantees are provided to a CCP, that CCP shall take them into account when calculating its exposure to the bank that is also a clearing member. The CCP shall apply adequate haircuts to asset values and guarantees to reflect the potential for their value to decline over the interval between their last revaluation and the time by which they can reasonably be assumed to be liquidated. It shall take into account the liquidity risk following the default of a market participant and the concentration risk on certain assets that may result in establishing the acceptable collateral and the relevant haircuts. When revising the level of the haircuts it applies to the assets it accepts as collateral, the CCP shall take into account any potential procyclicality effects of such revisions.;
Amendment 487 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 6
Article 48 – paragraph 6
(33 a) Paragraph 6 is amended: "6. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s client in accordance with Article 39(3), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client to another clearing member designated by the client, on the client’s request or unless the client objects before the transfer of assets and positions is concluded and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept these assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the client by which it has committed itself to do so. When designating a clearing member, the client shall contractually designate an alternative clearing member to be used in case their positions need to be transferred in the event of default. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 488 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 6
Article 48 – paragraph 6
(33 b) A subparagraph is added to Article 48(6) "6. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s client in accordance with Article 39(3), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client to another clearing member designated by the client, on the client’s request and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept these assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the client by which it has committed itself to do so. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client. client. a. In the case of default of an existing clearing member and for the purposes of porting clients from the defaulting clearing members towards an alternative clearing member, such alternative clearing member, the client subject to porting and the CCP shall be temporary waived from the requirements of Directive (EU) 2015/849, Directive (EU) 2018/843 and Directive (EU) 2019/1153. The alternative clearing member shall we temporarily waived from the requirements of capital for clearing members towards clients under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 489 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 47 – paragraph 9 (new)
Article 47 – paragraph 9 (new)
Amendment 490 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 -a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 5
Article 48 – paragraph 5
(34 a) "5. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s clients in accordance with Article 39(2), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of its clients to another clearing member designated by all of those clients, on their request or unless all clients object before the transfer of assets and positions is concluded and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept those assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the clients by which it has committed itself to do so. When designating a clearing member, clients shall contractually designate an alternative clearing member to be used in case their positions need to be transferred in the event of default. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of its clients. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 495 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
Where a CCP considers that the change to the models referred to in paragraph 1 it intends to adopt is not significant as referred to paragraph 1gin the below list, the CCP shall request that the application be subject to a non-objection procedure under paragraph 1b. In that case, the CCP may start applying such change before the decision of the CCP’s competent authority and ESMA pursuant to paragraph 1b. A change shall be considered as non- significant where one of the following conditions is met: a) the change leads to a decrease or increase of the margin requirements greater than 10% and lower than 20%; b) The CCP intends to offer a new clearing member access model, or to offer clearing services with a non-materially different risk profile and characteristics than the current ones, c) The list of eligible collateral is extended to accept collateral with a materially different risk profile: a. new asset class; b. new category of issuer, such as corporate or sovereign, or level of credit risk.
Amendment 502 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point a
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point a
(a) the change leads to a decrease or increase of the total pre-funded financial resources, including margin requirements, default fund and skin-in-the-game, greater than 1520 %;
Amendment 506 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point b
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point b
Amendment 508 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point c
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point c
Amendment 511 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point d
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point d
(d) the methodology for defining and calibrating stress test scenarios for the purpose of determining default fund exposures, is changed, leading to a decrease or increase greater than 20 % of a default fund, or greater than 50 % of any individual default fund contribution;
Amendment 513 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point e
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point e
(e) the methodology applied to assess liquidity risk and monitor concentration risk, is changed, leading to a decrease or increase of the estimated liquidity needs in any currency greater than 20 % or the total liquidity needs greater than 10 %;
Amendment 515 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point f
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point f
(f) the methodology applied to value collateral, or calibrate collateral haircut or set concentration limits, is changed, such that the total value of non- cash collateral decreases or increases by more than 120 %; provided that the CCP’s proposed change does not fulfil any criteria for the extension of CCP’s authorisation specified in Article 2(1);
Amendment 517 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point g
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point g
Amendment 523 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 7 (new)
Article 49 – paragraph 7 (new)
(d a) the following paragraph 7 is added: Where a CCP intends to adopt a change that does not qualify as non-significant pursuant to paragraph 1a of Article 49 and does not qualify significant under paragraph 1g of Article 49, such change shall be directly implemented by the CCP and shall not be subject to the procedures referred to in paragraph 49.
Amendment 25 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) access to information on processing of personal data in the context of regulatory sandboxes referred to in Articles 11 and 12, if any high risks to the rights and freedoms of the data subjects, as referred to in Article 35(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, has been identified, as well as access to information on response mechanisms to promptly mitigate those risks. The published information may include a disclosure of the data protection impact assessment;
Amendment 30 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point f a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point f a (new)
(fa) personal data shall not be processed for any further prupose other than for the purpose for which the personal data was originally collected
Amendment 31 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point f b (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point f b (new)
(fb) shall ensure that personal data which have previously been processed and enriched with data from other participants do not become data in a production environment again
Amendment 100 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) This Regulation shall not apply to exhaust emissions from passenger cars and vans. These emissions shall continue to be regulated, and the provisions under Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information shall apply. The requirements for the type approval procedures for light passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles, as well as the test methodology, including the boundary conditions for testing, should remain those currently laid down in Regulation No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information.
Amendment 101 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 b (new)
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) The requirements for the type approval procedures for motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy goods vehicles and buses, as well as the test methodology, including the boundary conditions for testing, should remain those currently laid down in Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information.
Amendment 109 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The technical requirements for the type-approval of motor vehicles, engines and replacement parts with regard to emissions (‘emission type-approval’) are currently set out in two Regulations that apply to emission type-approval for light- duty and heavy-duty vehicles respectively, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Euro 6’)44 and Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Euro VI’)45 . The reason for having two Regulations was that the emissions of heavy-duty vehicles were checked based on engine testing, while for light-duty vehicles the basis was whole vehicle testing. Since then, methodologies have been developed that allow testing of both light- and heavy-duty vehicles on the road. It is therefore no longer necessary to base type-approval on engine testing. __________________ 44 Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ L 171, 29.6.2007, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 112 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The technical requirements for the type-approval of motor vehicles, engines and replacement parts with regard to emissions (‘emission type-approval’) are currently set out in two Regulations that apply to emission type-approval for light- duty and heavy-duty vehicles respectively, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Euro 6’)44 and Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Euro VI’)45 . The reason for having two Regulations was that the emissions of heavy-duty vehicles were checked based on engine testing, while for light-duty vehicles the basis was whole vehicle testing. Since then, methodologies have been developed that allow testing of both light- and heavy-duty vehicles on the road. It is therefore no longer necessary to base type-approval on engine testing. __________________ 44 Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ L 171, 29.6.2007, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directives 80/1269/EEC, 2005/55/EC and 2005/78/EC (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 118 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 121 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Furthermore, the current emission limits were adopted in 2007 for light-duty vehicles and for heavy-duty vehicles in 2009. Both emission limits were adopted on the basis of the then available technology. Since then, technology has advanced and the level of emissions achieved with a combination of current technologies is much lower than that achieved more than 15 years ago. That technological progress should be reflected in emission limits based on state-of-the- art existing technology and knowledge of pollution controls and for all relevant pollutants.
Amendment 123 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
Amendment 130 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to ensure that the emissions for both light and heavy duty vehicles are limited in real life, testing vehicles in real conditions of use with a minimumrelevant set of restrictions, boundaries and other driving requirements and not only in the laboratory is required. This on-road testing should exclude biased driving and rare driving conditions.
Amendment 134 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to ensure that the emissions for both light and heavy duty vehicles are limited in real life, testing vehicles in real conditions of use with a minimumover a statistically relevant non-biased set of restrictions, boundaries and other driving requirements and not only in the laboratory is required.
Amendment 138 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 152 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Non-exhaust emissions consist of particles emitted by tyres and brakes of vehicles. Emissions from tyres is estimated to be the largest source of microplastics to the environment. As shown in the Impact Assessment, it is expected that by 2050, non-exhaust emissions will constitute up to 90% of all particles emitted by road transport, because exhaust particles (and all other exhaust pollutants) will diminish due to vehicle electrification. Those non- exhaust emissions should therefore be measured and limited. The Commission should prepare a report on tyre abrasion by the end of 2024 to review the most appropriate measurement methods and state-of-the- art in order to propose tyre abrasion limits in accordance with the work performed in the UN World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP29) Task Force on Tyre Abrasion.
Amendment 154 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Non-exhaust emissions consist of particles emitted by tyres and brakes of vehicles. Emissions from tyres is estimated to be the largest source of microplastics to the environment. As shown in the Impact Assessment, it is expected that by 2050, non-exhaust emissions will constitute up to 90% of all particles emitted by road transport, because exhaust particles will diminish due to vehicle electrification. Those non-exhaust emissions should therefore be measured and limited. The Commission should prepare a report on tyre abrasion by the end of 2024 to review the measurement methods and state-of-the- art in order to propose tyre abrasion limitscurrently under discussion in the relevant working groups of the UN World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP29).
Amendment 158 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Vehicles with traction batteries, including plugin hybrids and battery electric vehicles, contribute to the decarbonisation of the road transport sector. In order to gain and increase consumer trust in such vehicles, they should be performant and durable. It is therefore important to require that traction batteries retain a good part of their initial capacity after many years of use. That is of particular importance to buyers of second hand electric vehicles to ensure that the vehicle will continue to perform as expected. Monitors of the battery state- of- health certified energy (SOCE) and state of certified range (SOCR) should therefore be required for all vehicles that use traction batteries. In addition minimum performance requirements for battery durability of passenger cars should be introduced, taking into account the UN Global Technical Regulation 2247 . __________________ 47 United Nations Global Technical Regulation on In-vehicle Battery Durability for Electrified Vehicles, UN GTR 22
Amendment 166 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Sensors and other complex devices installed on vehicles are already used today to detect anomalies on emissions , store information and trigger need for related repairs through the on-board diagnostic (OBD) system. The OBD system currently in use, however, does not detect accurately or timely the malfunctions and neither does it sufficiently and timely force repairs. As a result, it is possible that vehicles emit much more than they are allowed to do. Th and the dashboard malfunction indicator (MI). Some sensors used up to now for OBD can also be used to monitor and control the emission behaviour of the vehicles on a continuous basis via an on-board monitoring (OBM) system. The OBM will also warn the user to perform repairs of the engine or the pollution control systems when these are needed. It is therefore appropriate to require that such a system is installed and to regulate its technical requirementsand may help improve the functionality of OBD.
Amendment 172 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 175 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Manufacturers may opt to produce vehicles which comply with lower emission limits or with better battery durability than what is required in this Regulation, or which include advanced options including geofencing and adaptive controls. Consumers and national authorities should be able to identify such vehicles through appropriate documentation. An environmental vehicle passport (EVP) should therefore be made available.
Amendment 179 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In case the CommissionThe decarbonisation of the transport sector requires a technologically open framework. In case the Commission should thus deliver on its promise to makes a proposal for registering after 2035 new light-dutynew vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels outside the scope of the CO2 fleet standards, and in conformity with Union law and the Union’s climate neutrality objective, t. This Regulation will need to be amended to include the possibility to type approve such vehiclesshould introduce the possibility for manufacturers to designate vehicles equipped with internal combustion engines running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels. For the purpose of the CO2 fleet standards for light and heavy duty vehicles, the CO2 tailpipe emissions from these vehicles should be considered zero.
Amendment 180 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In case the CommissionAny Regulation in the transport sector requires a technologically open framework. The Commission should thus deliver on its promise to makes a proposal for registering after 2035 new light-dutynew vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels outside the scope of the CO2 fleet standards, and in conformity with Union law and the Union’´s climate neutrality objective, t. This Regulation will need to be amended to include the possibility to type approve such vehiclesshould introduce the possibility for manufacturers to designate vehicles equipped with internal combustion engines running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels. For the purpose of the CO2 fleet standards for light and heavy duty vehicles, the CO2 tailpipe emissions from these vehicles should be considered zero.
Amendment 184 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) This Regulation should provide for the type approval of new light and heavy duty vehicles that operate solely on CO2 neutral fuels, including synthetic fuels, outside the scope of the CO2 fleet standards. A specific vehicle category for its type approval should be established. Such vehicles using the internal combustion engine should be eligible for registration, even beyond 2035, in order to allow for strictly technologically neutral approach.
Amendment 185 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Scientific and technological findings prove the sustainability of climate-friendly, CO2-neutral fuels. In order to ensure that no fossil fuels are used in vehicles powered by these fuels, the Commission should work out requirement and rules, in cooperation with manufacturers and suppliers, to find technical solutions (e.g. sensors in fuel tank) that are practical, affordable and suitable for the masses.
Amendment 187 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Emissions from vehicles sold by small volume manufacturers constitute an insignificant part of emissions in the Union. Some fFlexibility mayshould therefore be allowed in some of the requirements for such manufacturers. Small volume manufacturers should therefore be able to substitute certain tests during type- approval with declarations of compliance, while ultra-small volume manufacturers should be allowed to use laboratory tests based on random real-driving cyclesfor such manufacturers in relation to what is also demanded through the CO2 regulations by delaying the application of Euro 7 until 2035.
Amendment 193 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in relation to obligations of manufacturers as part of type-approval and procedures, test and methodologies to be applied for declaration of conformity, conformity of production check, in-service conformity-check and environmental vehicle passport (EVP); options and designations of vehicles; requirements, tests, methods and corrective measures related to durability of vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units, as well as registration and communication capabilities of OBM systems, including for the purpose of periodic technical inspections and roadworthiness checks; requirements and information to be provided by manufacturers of multistage vehicles as well as procedures to determine the CO2 value for these multistage vehicles; technical elements, administrative and documentation requirements for emission type-approval, checks and inspections and market surveillance checks, as well as reporting obligations, in-service conformity and conformity of production checks; methods and tests to (i) measure exhaust emissions in the lab and on the road, including random and worst-casebut statistically relevant RDE test cycles, the use of portable emissions measurement systems for verifying real driving emissions, and idle emissions, (ii) determine the CO2 emissions, fuel and energy consumption, the electric range and engine power of a motor vehicle, (iii) provide specifications for gear shift indicator (GSI) (iv) determine the impact of O3, O4 trailers on the CO2 , fuel and energy consumption, electric range and engine power of a motor vehicle, (iv) measure crankcase emissions, evaporative emissions, and brake emissions in full accordance with UN WFHVR , (v) evaluate compliance with minimum performance requirements of battery durability in full accordance with UN WFHVR , (vi) assess the in-service conformity of engines and vehicles; compliance thresholds and performance requirements, as well as (vii) test and methods to ensure performanceroper functioning of sensors (for OBD and OBM) ; (viii) methods to ensure and assess security measures; specification and characteristics of driver warning systems and inducement methods and to assess their correct operation; (ix) methods to assess the correct operation, effectiveness, regeneration and durability of original and replacement pollution control systems; (x) methods to ensure and assess security measures including vulnerability analysis and tampering protection; (xi) methods to assess the correct functioning of types approved under specific EURO7 designations; (xii) criteria for emission type- approvals for small and ultra-small volume manufacturers; (xiii) checks and test procedures for multistage vehicles; (xiv) performance requirements for test equipment; (xv) specification of reference fuels; and (xvi) methods for assessing the absence of defeat devices and defeat strategies; (xvii) to measure tyre abrasion, as well as (xviii) EVP format, data and method of communication of the EVP data in full accordance with UN WFHVR. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council50 . Commission should adopt the acts provided in this paragraph no later than one year from the date of entry in force of this Regulation or of the UN WFHVR. __________________ 50 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 195 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
Amendment 198 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) In order to amend or supplement, as appropriate, non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of test conditions based on data collected when testing Euro 7 vehicles, brakes or tyres; application of test requirements, in particular taking into account technical progress and data collected when testing Euro 7 vehicles; introducing vehicle options and designations based on innovative technologies for manufacturers but also setting out brake particle emission limits and abrasion limits for tyre types as well as minimum performance requirements of batteries and durability multipliers based on data collected when testing Euro 7 vehicles and setting out definitions and special rules for small volume manufacturers for vehicle, but only in order to reduce the complexity of the procedures; setting out brake particle emission limits and abrasion limits for tyre types synchronising with the test method and limits proposed at UN WP29 as well as minimum performance requirements of cbattegories M2, M3, N2, N3,. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making51 . In particular, in order to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. Commission should adopt the acts provided in this paragraph no later than one year from the date of entry in force of this Regulation or of the UN WFHVR. __________________ 51 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 203 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) It is important to grant Member States, national type-approval authorities and economic operators enough time to prepare for the application of the new rules introduced by this Regulation. The date of application should therefore be deferred. While for light duty vehicles the date of application should be as soon as technically possible, for heavy duty vehicles and trailers the date of application may be further delayed by two years, since the transition to zero-emission vehicles will be longer for heavy duty vehicles until the implementing and delegated acts have been subsequently delivered and adopted by the Commission and by granting four years lead time from then.
Amendment 205 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) It is important to grant Member States, national type-approval authorities and economic operators enough time to prepare for the application of the new rules introduced by this Regulation. The date of application should therefore be deferred. While for light duty vehicles the date of application should be as soon as technically possible, for heavy duty vehicles and trailers the date of application may be further delayed by two years, since the transition to zero-emission vehicles will be longer for heavy duty vehicles until all relevant secondary legislation has been adopted. Additionally, from this point in time, three years lead time for new types and five years lead time for all types enables a smooth transition.
Amendment 209 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation exclusively establishes common technical requirements and administrative provisions for the emission type-approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units, with regard to their CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption and battery durabilitynon-exhaust emissions and other pollutants, such as particulates from vehicles’ tyres and brakes.
Amendment 211 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes common technical requirements and administrative provisions for the emission type-approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units, with regard to their CO2 andnon-exhaust pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption and battery durability.
Amendment 214 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation lays down rules for the initial emission type approval, conformity of production, in-service conformity, market surveillance, the durability of pollution control systems and traction batteries, on-boardshall not apply to exhaust emission rules for light passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles. For these rules, Regulation No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of monitoring systems, security provisions to limit tampering and cybersecurity measures, vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) and theon accurate determination of CO2 emissions, electric range, fuel and energy consumption and energy efficiencess to vehicle repair and maintenance information shall apply independently.
Amendment 215 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation lays down rules for the initial emission type approval, conformity of production, in-service conformity, market surveillance, the durability of pollution control systems and traction batteries, on- board monitoring systems, security provisions to limit tampering and cybersecurity measures, and the accurate determination of CO2 emissions, electric range, fuel and energy consumption and energy efficiency.
Amendment 217 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This Regulation shall not apply to the requirements for the type approval procedures for light passenger vehicles, light commercial vehicles, motor vehicles and engines with regard to emissions from heavy goods vehicles and buses, as well as the test methodology, including boundary conditions for testing. For these rules, Regulation No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information and Regulation No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information shall apply independently.
Amendment 218 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This Regulation lays down rules for the type-approval of newly- manufactured tyres with regard to their tyre abrasion emissions and amends for this purpose the General Safety Regulation (EU) 2019/2144.
Amendment 222 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 5
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 5
Amendment 224 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 7
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 7
(7) ‘exhaust emissions’ means the emission from the tailpipe of the motor vehicle or engine of all of the following: CO2, gaseous, solid, liquid compounds and crankcase emissions;
Amendment 230 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 14
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 14
(14) ‘’10 nm particle number above 10 nm’ or ‘PN10’ means the total number of solid particles emitted from the tailpipe or the brakes that have a diameter larger or equal thanmeasured according to the procedure described in this Regulation with a nominal cut-off at 10 nm;
Amendment 238 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 29
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 29
(29) ‘tyre abrasion’ means the mass of material lost from the tyre due to the abrasion process and emitted to the environment;(1); ‘tyre abrasion rate’ means the ratio of the tyre abrasion per 1000 km of distance travelled to the load on the tyre(2) ‘tyre abrasion index’ means the dimensionless unit for expressing the tyre abrasion rate of a tyre relative to that of the applicable Standardized Reference Test Tyre (SRTT). (1) The ‘tyre abrasion’ is expressed in grams (g) (2) The load on the tyre is expressed in tonne (t); the tyre abrasion rate is expressed in g/t/1000km
Amendment 243 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 34
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 34
(34) ‘original pollution control systems’ means a pollution control system or an assembly of such systems covered by the type-approval granted for the vehicle concerned and fitted to the vehicle when it is first produced;
Amendment 245 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 36
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 36
Amendment 247 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 37
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 37
(37) ‘on-board diagnostic system’ or ‘OBD’ means a system that can generate vehicle on-board diagnostic (OBD) information, as defined in Article 3, point 49, of Regulation (EU) 2018/858 and is capable of communicating that information via the OBD port and over the air;in the context of this Regulation, a system on-board the vehicle which has the capability of detecting malfunctions of the monitored emission control systems, identifying the likely area of a malfunction by means of fault codes stored in computer memory, and illumination of the Malfunction Indicator (MI) to notify the operator of the vehicle.
Amendment 251 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 37
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 37
(37) ‘on-board diagnostic system’ or ‘OBD’ means a system that can generate vehicle on-board diagnostic (OBD) information, as defined in Article 3, point 49, of Regulation (EU) 2018/858 and is capable of communicating that information via the OBD port and over the air;
Amendment 254 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 38
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 38
(38) ‘on-board monitoring system’ or ‘OBM’ means a system on board a vehicle that is capable of detecting either emission exceedances or when a vehicle is in zero emission mode if applicable, and capable of indicatmonitoring emissions withing the occurrence of such exceedances by means of information stored in the vehicle,measurement tolerance and of communicating that information via the OBD port and over the air;
Amendment 255 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 38
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 38
(38) ‘on-board monitoring system’ or ‘OBM’ means a system on board a vehicle that is capable of detecting either emission exceedances omonitoring emissions under wthen a vehicle is in zero emission mode if applicable, and capable of indicating the occurrence of such exceedances by means of information stored in the vehicle, and of communicat consideration of OBM measurement tolerance and providing that information via the OBD port and over the air;
Amendment 261 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42
(42) ‘real driving emissions’ or ‘RDE’ means the emissions of a vehicle under normal driving conditions and extended conditions as specified in Tables 1 and 2 of Annex III; maximum one of the extended conditions; RDE test shall be divided by the applicable conformity factor.
Amendment 263 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42
(42) ‘real driving emissions’ or ‘RDE’ means the emissions of a vehicle under normal driving conditions and one extended conditions at the same time as specified in Tables 1 and 2 of Annex III;
Amendment 265 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42 a (new)
(42a) In order to allow manufacturers to comply with the emission limits in the context of test procedures, the compliance criteria should be introduced by Commission in two steps. During the first step, upon the request of the manufacturer, a temporary conformity factor should apply, while as a second step only the final conformity factor should be used. The final conformity factor should set during a transition period and include a margin expressing the additional measurement uncertainty. The Commission should continuously assess that conformity factor in light of technical progress and annually adjust it downwards on the basis of scientific evidence, the improved accuracy of the measuring procedure and technical progress. The conformity factor should be gradually lowered and cease to apply by 2035.
Amendment 266 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 44
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 44
(44) ‘tampering’ means the inactivation, or modification by the economic operators or independent operators, of the engine, vehiclepower- train ECU such as pollution control device and system, propulsion system, traction battery, odometer, OBFCM or OBD/OBM, including any software or other logical control elements of those systems and their data;for personal benefit.
Amendment 274 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
(78a) "CO2 Neutral Fuels" means fuel which produces no net-greenhouse gas emissions or carbon footprint; including biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin or recycled carbon fuels, including synthetic fuels.
Amendment 275 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
(78a) 'CO2 neutral fuels' means renewable fuels as defined in Directive 2018/2001 including biofuels, biogas, biomass fuels, Renewable Fuels of Non- Biological Origin (RFNBO) or Recycled Carbon Fuels (RCF).
Amendment 276 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 a (new)
(78a) "CO2 Neutral Fuels" means renewable fuels as defined in Directive 2018/2001, including biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of non- biological origin or recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 277 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 57 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 57 a (new)
(57a) ‘ CO2 neutral fuel vehicle’ or ‘CNCEV’ means a light or heavy-duty vehicle equipped with a combustion engine running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuel, including synthetic fuels.
Amendment 280 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 b (new)
(78b) "Carbon Correction Factor (CCF)" means a factor reflecting the CO2 intensity and share of CO2 neutral fuels;
Amendment 281 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 78 b (new)
(78b) "Carbon Correction Factor (CCF)" means a factor reflecting the CO2 intensity and share of CO2 neutral fuels;
Amendment 282 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 61
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 61
(61) ‘wheel power’ means the power measudetermined according to this Regulation, to be delivered at the wheel discs of a vehicle and used for its propulsion;
Amendment 285 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 62
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 62
(62) ‘power-to-mass-ratio’ means the ratio of rated power to the mass in running ordertechnically permissible maximum laden mass (TPMLM);
Amendment 290 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 69
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 69
(69) ‘(in-vehicle)-battery durability’ means the durability of a traction battery measured in terms of its State of HealthCertified Energy and its State of Certified Range;
Amendment 291 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 70
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 70
(70) ‘state of healthCertified Energy’ or ‘SOCE’ and state of Certified Range’ or ‘SOHCR’ means the measured or estimated state of a specific performance metric of a vehicle (range) or traction battery (energy) at a specific point in its lifetime, expressed as a percentage of the performance that was determined when certified or new;
Amendment 295 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 71
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 71
Amendment 298 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 77
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 77
Amendment 303 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Manufacturers shall ensure that the new vehicles they manufacture, which are sold, registered or put into service in the Union, are type approved in accordance with this Regulation. MAs from the specific application dates referred to in Article 20, manufacturers shall ensure that the new components or separate technical units, including engines, traction batteries, brake emission systems and replacement pollution control systems requiring type- approval which they manufacture and which are sold or put into service in the Union are type approved in accordance with this Regulation.
Amendment 307 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Manufacturers shall design, construct and assemble vehicles to comply with this Regulation, including complying with the emission limits set out in Annex I under the testing conditions set out in Annex III and respecting the values declared in the certificate of conformity and in the type- approval documentation for the lifetime of the vehicle as set out in table 1 of Annex IV. These vehicles shall be designated as “Euro 7” vehicles.
Amendment 310 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Manufacturers shall design, construct and assemble vehicles to comply with this Regulation, including complying with the emission limits set out in Annex I aund respecting the values declared in the certificate of conformity and er the conditions set out in Annex III and respecting the type- approval documentation for the lifetime of the vehicle as set out in table 1 of Annex IV. These vehicles shall be designated as “Euro 7” vehicles.
Amendment 312 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
When verifying compliance with the exhaust emission limits, where the testing is performed in maximum one of the extended driving conditions, the emissions shall be divided by the extended driving divider set out in Annex IIIthe relevant annexes in Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 and Regulation (EU) 582/2011.
Amendment 316 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
When verifying compliance with the exhaust emission limits, where the testing is performed in one extended driving conditions, the emissions shall be divided by the extended driving divider set out in Annex III.
Amendment 317 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Amendment 319 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Manufacturers shall design and construct components or separate technical units, including engines, traction batteries, brake systems and replacement pollution control systems to comply with this Regulation, including complying with the emission limits set out in Annex I under the testing conditions set out in Annex III.
Amendment 321 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. As regards tyre abrasion, provisions on new tyres shall be developed based on the test method and limits developed in UN WP29 Task Force on Tyre Abrasion. For the purpose of tyre type approval, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144.
Amendment 324 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) OBM systems capable of detectmonitoring emissions above the emission limits due to malfunctions, increased degradation or other situations that increase emissionswithin the measurement tolerance;
Amendment 326 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) OBM systems capable of detectmonitoring emissions above the emission limits due to malfunctions, increased degradation or other situations that increase emissions;within the capability of OBM measurement tolerances
Amendment 330 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) OBFCM device to monitor their real-world fuel and energy consumption and other relevant parameters such as payload/massintended for vehicle propulsion [MB1] and for vehicles of categories N2 and N3 which are needed to determine their real- world fuel and energy efficiency;
Amendment 331 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) SOHCE and SOCR monitors of the traction battery and emissionSOH monitors of tailpipe emission control systems;
Amendment 335 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point g
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point g
(g) devices communicating vehicle generated data together with the approval number and type variant version used for compliance with this regulation and OBFCM data, for the purpose of periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection over the air, and for the purposes of communicating with recharging infrastructure and stationary power systems capable of supporting smart and bidirectional charging functionalities.
Amendment 336 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point g
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point g
(g) devices communicating vehicle generated data used for compliance with this regulation and OBFCM data, for the purpose of periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection over the air, and for the purposes of communicating with recharging infrastructure and stationary power systems capable of supporting smart and bidirectional charging functionalities.
Amendment 339 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Article 4 – paragraph 8
8. The manufacturer shall prevent the possibility of exploiting vulnerabilities referred to in paragraph 7, based on state of the art technology at the time of type approval. When such a vulnerability is found, the manufacturer shall take measures to remove the vulnerability, by software update or any other appropriate means.
Amendment 340 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Article 4 – paragraph 8
8. The manufacturer shall take measures to prevent the possibility of exploiting vulnerabilities referred to in paragraph 7. When such a vulnerability is found, the manufacturer shall remove the vulnerability, by software update or any other appropriate means to the extent possible based on knowledge at the time of type approval.
Amendment 343 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 10
Article 4 – paragraph 10
Amendment 348 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Amendment 354 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Amendment 361 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 364 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 369 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Amendment 374 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Amendment 378 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Manufacturers may designate vehicles as “Euro 7G vehicle” where those vehicles are equipped with internal combustion engines with geofencing technologies. The manufacturer shall install a driver warning system on those vehicles to inform the user when the traction batteries are nearly empty and to stop the vehicle if not charged within 5 km from the first warning while on zero- emission mode. The application of such geofencing technologies may be verified during the lifetime of the vehicle.
Amendment 381 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Manufacturers may designate vehicles as "Euro 7CN vehicle" where those vehicles are equipped with internal combustion engines running on CO2 neutral fuels, as defined in Art. 3 (78a), either exclusively or as a blend. The tailpipe CO2 emissions from Euro 7CN vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels are considered zero for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2023/851 and [Revision of Regulation 2019/1242]. The tailpipe C02 emissions from Euro 7CN vehicles running on a blend of fossil and CO2 neutral fuels are calculated in accordance with the carbon correction factor, as defined in Art. 3 (78b), for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2023/851 and [Revision of Regulation 2019/1242].
Amendment 382 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Manufacturers may designate vehicles as "Euro 7CN vehicle" where those vehicles are equipped with internal combustion engines running on CO2 neutral fuels, as defined in Art. 3 (78a), either exclusively or as a blend. The tailpipe CO2 emissions from Euro 7CN vehicles running exclusively on CO2 neutral fuels are considered zero for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2023/851 and [Revision of Regulation 2019/1242]. The tailpipe C02 emissions from Euro 7CN vehicles running on a blend of fossil and CO2 neutral fuels are calculated in accordance with the carbon correction factor, as defined in Art. 3 (78b), for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2023/851 and [Revision of Regulation 2019/1242].
Amendment 389 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Manufacturers may construct vehicles combining two or more of the characteristics referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 and designate them using a combination of symbols and letters such as “Euro 7+A”ACN", “Euro 7+GCN”, “Euro 7+AGCN” or “Euro 7AG” vehicles.
Amendment 395 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. At the manufacturer’s request, for N2 and M2 vehicles between 3.5 and 4up to including 5.0 tonnes maximum mass originating from an N1 vehicle type, the type-approval authority may grant an emission type- approval for N1 vehicle type. Such vehicles shall be designated as “Euro 7ext vehicle”.
Amendment 402 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7
Article 5 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, detailed rules on the procedures, tests and methodologies to verify compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraphs 1 to4a and 6. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(2).
Amendment 406 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Manufacturers shall ensure that thes technological construction of the vehicles comply with the values regarding CO2 emissions, fuel and energy consumption and energy efficiency declared under the provisions of this Regulation for the lifetime of the vehicle as set out in Annex IV, Table 1 in case of standard use of this vehicle.
Amendment 407 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Manufacturers shall ensure that the- functionality of OBFCM, OBD and OBM devices and anti- tampering measures installed in these vehicles comply with the provisions of this Regulationshall not be deactivated as long as the vehicle is in use.
Amendment 411 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The OBM systems installed by the manufacturer in these vehicles shall be capable of monitoring emissions within the measurement tolerance and of communicating this data via the OBD port and optionally of the following:ver the air, including for the purpose of roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspections;
Amendment 412 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The OBM systems installed by the manufacturer in these vehicles shall be capable of all of the following: communicating via the OBD port, including for the purpose of roadworthiness tests and 1a technical roadside inspections1b __________________ 1a Directive 2014/47/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 134). 1b Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 129)
Amendment 416 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point a
Amendment 417 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point a
Amendment 418 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point b
Amendment 419 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point b
Amendment 421 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 47 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 47 – introductory part
(47) ‘small volume manufacturer’ means a manufacturer of fewer than 10 000 new motor vehicles of category M1 or 22 000 new motor vehicles of category N1 or 5 000 new motor vehicles of category N2 or 5 000 new motor vehicles of category N3 or 2 000 new motor vehicles of category M2 or 2 000 new motor vehicles of category M3 registered in the Union perin the previous calendar year and which:
Amendment 425 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point c
Amendment 426 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 48
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 48
(48) ‘ultra-small-volume manufacturer’ means a small volume manufacturer that produces fewer than 1 0500 new motor vehicles of category M1 or fewer than 1 01 500 new motor vehicles of category N1 or 1 500 new motor vehicles of category N2 or 1 500 new motor vehicles of category N3 or 500 new motor vehicles of category M2 or 500 new motor vehicles of category N1M3 registered in the Union in the previous calendar year;
Amendment 427 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
7. The OBFCM devices installed by the manufacturer in these vehicles shall be capable of communicating the vehicle data they record via the OBD port and over the air, respecting the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 429 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
7. The OBFCM devices installed by the manufacturer in these vehicles shall be capable of communicating thelegally appropriate and necessary vehicle data they record via the OBD port and over the air.
Amendment 434 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Article 6 – paragraph 8
8. For vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units, presenting a serious risk or non-compliance with the requirements laid down in this regulation, manufacturers shall immediatelybe instructed according to the process and timescales of implementing legislation to take the necessary corrective measures, including repairs or modifications of those vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units as appropriate, to ensure compliance with this regulation. Manufacturers or any other economic operator shall withdraw it from the market or recall it, as appropriate. The manufacturer shall immediately inform the type approval authority that granted the type-approval of the non-conformity with appropriate details.
Amendment 438 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Article 6 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, detailed rules on requirements, tests, methods and corrective measures related to the obligations referred to in paragraphs 1 to2, 3, 6,7 and 8. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 17(2).
Amendment 441 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The manufacturer shall provide the type-approval authority with a signed declaration of conformity as regards the RDE, CO2 ambient temperature correction, OBD, OBM, emission and battery durability, continuous or periodic regeneration, anti-tampering and crankcase requirements as specified in Annex V. The manufacturer shall provide to the type- approval authority a signed declaration of conformity on the use of adaptive controls and geofencing options when the manufacturer selects these options.
Amendment 449 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Amendment 453 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Amendment 463 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. As regards pollutant emissions, small volume manufacturers may substitute tests set out in tables 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 of Annex V with declarations of conformity. The compliance of vehicles constructed and put into the market by small volume manufacturers may be tested for in service conformity and market surveillance in accordance with tables 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 of Annex V. Conformity of production tests set out in Annex V shall not be required. Article 4(46) point (b) shall not apply to small volume manufacturers.
Amendment 465 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Ultra-small volume manufacturers shall complydemonstrate compliance with the emission limits set out in Annex I in laboratory tests based on random real-driving cycles for in-service conformity and market surveillance purposes.
Amendment 468 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Amendment 470 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Amendment 476 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. With effect from … [OP please insert the date = the date of entry into force of all implementing or delegated Regulation related to this Regulation], where a manufacturer so requests, the national approval authorities shall not refuse to grant EU emission type-approval or national emission type-approval for a new type of vehicle or engine, or prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of a new vehicle complying with this regulation.
Amendment 482 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. With effect from … [OP please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this Reguall relevant secondary legislation], where a manufacturer so requests, the national approval authorities shall not refuse to grant EU emission type-approval or national emission type-approval for a new type of vehicle or engine, or prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of a new vehicle complying with this regulation.
Amendment 486 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. With effect from 2 years after entry into force of this Regulation, national authorities shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and electric energy consumption or battery durability, in the case of new types of M1, N1 vehicles, refuse to grant EU emission type-approval or national emission type-approval which do not comply with this Regulation.
Amendment 487 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. With effect from 1 July 2025... [OP please insert the date = three years after the date of entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation], national authorities shall, in the case of new M1, N1 vehicles, in respect to new vehicle types, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles. With effect from ... [OP please insert the date = five years after the date of entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation], national authorities shall, in the case of all new M1, N1 vehicles, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles.
Amendment 488 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. With effect from 1 July 2025As from 4 years after the entry into force of all implementing or delegated acts mandated by this regulation for obtaining vehicle type approval, national authorities shall, in the case of new M1, N1 vehicles, refuse on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption or battery durability, to grant EC type approval or national type approval, in respect to new vehicle types which do not comply with this Regulation. As from 5 years after the entry into force of all implementing or delegated Regulations relevant to the vehicle category in question, national authorities shall, in the case of new M1, N1 vehicles which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles.
Amendment 502 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. With effect from 1 July 2027As from 4 years after the date of entry into force of the final implementing or delegated Regulation related to this Regulation, national authorities shall, in the case of new M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and new O3, O4 trailers, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles. As of 5 years after the entry into force of all implementing or delegated Regulations relevant to the engine, vehicle or trailer category in question, national authorities shall, in the case of new M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and new O3, O4 trailers, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption, energy efficiency or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicleengines, vehicles or trailers.
Amendment 503 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. With effect from 1 July 2027... [OP please insert the date = three years after the date of entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation], national authorities shall, in the case of new M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and new O3, O4 trailers, in respect to new vehicle or trailer types, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption, energy efficiency or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles. With effect from ... [OP please insert the date = five years after the date of entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation], national authorities shall, in the case of all new M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and all new O3, O4 trailers, which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption, energy efficiency or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles.
Amendment 513 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. With effect from seven years after entry into force of this Regulation, national authorities shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and electric energy consumption or battery durability, in the case of new types of M1, N1 vehicle constructed by small volume manufacturers, refuse to grant EU emission type-approval or national emission type-approval which do not comply with this Regulation.
Amendment 519 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. With effect from 1 July 20305, national authorities shall, in the case of new M1, N1 vehicles constructed by small volume manufacturers which do not comply with this Regulation consider certificates of conformity to be no longer valid for the purposes of registration and shall, on grounds relating to CO2 and pollutant emissions, fuel and energy consumption, energy efficiency or battery durability, prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such vehicles.
Amendment 534 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. With effect from 1 July 2025As of 5 years after the date of entry into force of the final implementing or delegated Regulation related to this Regulation, the sale or installation of a system, component or separate technical unit intended to be fitted on an M1, N1 vehicle approved under this Regulation, shall be prohibited if the system, component and separate technical unit is not of type approved in compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 538 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. With effect from 1 July 2027As of 5 years after the date of entry into force of the final implementing or delegated Regulation related to this Regulation, the sale or installation of a system, component or separate technical unit intended to be fitted on an M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicle and new O3, O4 trailers approved under this Regulation, shall be prohibited if the system, component and separate technical unit is not of type approved in compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 562 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point g
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) brake system types and their replacement parts; specifically for the different vehicle categories that also take into account other on-vehicle systems that contribute to vehicle braking and braking of trailers
Amendment 567 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point h
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point h
(h) tyre types in respect to tyre abrasion; as defined by the relevant Regulation of the UN WP29
Amendment 577 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) for vehicles under the scope of Regulation (EC) 715/2007, the methods to measure exhaust emissions in the lab and on the road, including random and worst-case RDE test cycles,measures against biased driving and misuse during RDE testing the use of portable emissions measurement systems for verifying real driving emissions, and idle emissions;
Amendment 580 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the methods to measure exhaust emissions in the lab and on the road, including random and worst-casemeasures to prevent biased driving during RDE test cyclesing, the use of portable emissions measurement systems for verifying real driving emissions, and idle emissions;
Amendment 585 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the laboratory and in-service conformity test procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) 595/2009 for category M2, M3, N2 and N3 vehicles.
Amendment 587 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the methods to determine the CO2 emissions, fuel and energy consumption, zero-emission range, electric range and engine power of a motor vehicleor vehicles under the scope of Regulation (EC) 595/2009, to carry-over all laboratory and in-service conformity (ISC-PEMS) test procedures laid down in that Regulation and its subsequent amendments;
Amendment 594 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) the methods to measure brake particle emissions, including methods for HDV, real driving brake particle emissions on the basis of the completed UNECE GTR for M1 and N1 vehicles and to carry out an expansive inter-laboratory test program to determine the baseline for M1 and N1 vehicle brake wear emissions from which proportional brake wear limits can be considered, a similar approach for HDV when an appropriate test method has first been developed at UNECE level, and regenerative braking;
Amendment 603 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point j
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point j
(j) OBFCM device, OBD and OBM systems, including compliance thresholds, performance requirements and tests, methods to ensure performance of sensors and over the air communication of data recorded by these devices and systems;
Amendment 616 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point u
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point u
Amendment 624 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Amendment 628 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 629 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 630 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 632 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) Article 5 by introducing options and designations based on innovative technologies for manufacturers, including for vehicles equipped with an internal combustion engine running on CO2 neutral fuels, either exclusively or as a blend.
Amendment 633 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated act in accordance with Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 42 a (new).
Amendment 635 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Amendment 639 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) setting out brake particle emission limits in Annex I referring to the work performed inafter the completion and taking into account the work of the task force on Brake Emissions conducted under the auspices of the UN World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP29);
Amendment 640 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) setting out abrasion limits for tyre types in Annex I referrafter the completion and taking into account the work performed in theof the task force on tyre abrasion conducted under auspices of UN World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP29);
Amendment 647 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) setting out requirements and rules, in cooperation with manufactures and suppliers, for technical devices in vehicles that recognize the exclusive use of CO2- neutral fuels in vehicles.
Amendment 659 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EC) 715/2007 is repealed with effect from 1 July 2025the date specified in Article 10(4).
Amendment 671 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
Article 20 – paragraph 2
It shall apply as from 1 July 20254 years after the entry into force of all implementing or delegated acts mandated by this regulation for obtaining vehicle type approval, for M1, N1 vehicles and components and separate technical units for those vehicles and as from 1 July 20274 years after the entry into force of all implementing or delegated acts mandated by this regulation for obtaining vehicle type approval, for M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and components and separate technical units for those vehicles and O3, O4 trailers.
Amendment 674 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
Article 20 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from 1 July 2025... [OP please insert the date = three years after the date of entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation] for M1, N1 vehicles and components and separate technical units for those vehicles and from 1 July 2027 for M2, M3, N2, N3 vehicles and components and separate technical units for those vehicles and for O3, O4 trailers.
Amendment 682 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
Article 20 – paragraph 3
It shall apply from 1 July 20305 for M1, N1 vehicles constructed by small volume manufacturers. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, Article 11(3) shall apply from the entry into force of this regulation.
Amendment 689 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1
Annex I – Table 1
EURO 7 EMISSION LIMITS Euro 7 exhaust emission limits for M1, N1 vehicles with internal combustion engine Pollutant M1, N1 Only for N1 Emission Emission emissions vehicles vehicles budget for budget for with power all trips less all trips less to mass than 10 km than 10 km ratio1 less for M1, N1 only for N1 than 3544 vehicles vehicles kW/t with power to mass ratio less than 3544 kW/t per km per km per trip per trip NOx in mg 60 75 150 600 751500 PM in mg 4.5 4.55 45 450 PN10 in # 6×1011 6×1011 6×1012 6×1012 CO in mg 500 63750 5000 637500 THC in mg 100 1350 1000 13500 NMHC in 68 90 100 680 91000 mg NH3 in mg 20 20 40 200 200 400 ______________________ 1. Measured in accordance with paragraph 5.3.2. of UN/ECE Regulation No 85 in the case of ICEVs and PEVs, or, in all other cases, measured in accordance with one of the test procedures laid down in paragraph 6 of UN Global Technical Regulation 21
Amendment 694 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 2
Annex I – Table 2
Amendment 701 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 3
Annex I – Table 3
Euro 7 evaporative emission limits for petrol fuelled M1, N1 vehicles Pollutant emissions M1, N1 with maximum M1, N1 with maximum mass mass up to 2650 kg mass equal or more than 2650 2650 kg Evaporative emissions (in 0.50 g at worst day + hot 0.70 g at worst day + hot hot soak + 2 day diurnal soak soak test) Refuelling emissions 0.05 g/L of fueldeleted deleted 0.05 g/L of fuel deleted
Amendment 728 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 2
Annex III – Table 2
Amendment 729 #
2022/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 2
Annex III – Table 2
Amendment 53 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) To that end, harmonised rules on data generation and data sharing for short- term accommodation rental services should be laid down to increase access to and quality of data for public authorities on the provision of short-term accommodation rental services, which in turn should enable them to design and implement policies on such services in an effective and proportionate manner, in accordance with national and European law. This implies maintaining opportunities for platforms while respecting public policy objectives like available and affordable housing and protecting urban centres, particularly when economic conditions in Europe are facing challenges and opportunities for growth. Short-term accommodation rental services via platforms and their impact shall not undermine the high acceptance of tourism in Europe’s regions and enhance the livability of neighborhoods.
Amendment 54 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) By harmonising rules on data collection and sharing in the sector of short-term rentals in the internal market, this Regulation can play a decisive role in enhancing enforcement in the Member States. As a result of more effective enforcement, consumers should be able to assume that only legal listings are online and hosts of short-term rentals generally comply with the legal requirements and offer their services under fair conditions. Consequently, the objective of this regulation is to preserve and enhance the standard of consumer protection within the EU market.
Amendment 56 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The provisions stated in this regulation do not affect any additional requirements for reporting or registration as stipulated by EU law or national law, including but not limited to obligations related to taxation, population registration, or statistics.
Amendment 60 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The rules laid down in this Regulation including advertising for short-term rental services should apply to online platforms within the meaning of Article 3 point (i) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and the Council27, which allow guests to conclude distance contracts with hosts for the provision of short-term accommodation rental services. Therefore, webpages connecting hosts with guests without any further role in the conclusion of direct transactions should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation. Online platforms intermediating the provision of short-term accommodation rental services without payment (for example, online platforms intermediating the exchange of dwellings) are not covered by these rules, given that only short-term accommodation rental services provided against remuneration are covered. _________________ 27 Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act), (OJ L 277, 27.10.22, p. 1).
Amendment 72 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Competent authorities that wish to receive from online short-term rental platforms information about hosts’ activities and have registration systems in place should be able to obtain activity data from online platforms on a regular basis. The type of data that may be obtained should be fully harmonised and include information on the number of nights for which a registered unit has been rented, the number of guests that stayed in the unit per night, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit, and, in cases where the registration number is missing or incorrect, the identity of the host in line with the GDPR, which is needed in order to facilitate the identification of the host and the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services in cases where the registration number is missing or incorrect. Only online platforms that have effectively facilitated the conclusion of direct transactions between hosts and guests are covered by the obligation to provide the activity data, the registration number and the URL of the listing of the unit, as only those platforms are in a position to collect data, such as on the number of nights for which a unit is rented and the number of guests that stayed in the unit per night. Member States should not maintain or introduce measures that require platforms to report on short-term accommodation rental service providers and their activities diverging from those laid down in this Regulation, unless otherwise provided under Union law.
Amendment 82 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) Member States should ensure an effective enforcement of this Regulation as regards the provisions of this Regulation concerning the verification by the competent authorities, the results of the random checks, the obligation to include a reference to the information to be made available by Member States on rules governing the provision of short-term accommodation rental services and the data sharing obligations of short-term rental platforms. Due to the specific nature of those obligations, it should be for authorities designated by the Member State of the Single Digital Entry Point, in which the relevant unit is located, to enforce them. Member States should also lay down rules setting out penalties for the infringement of these provisions of this Regulation that apply to online short-term rental platforms and should ensure that such penalties are implemented and notified in accordance with Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council32. Such penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. These penalties should ensure an effective enforcement of this Regulation, notably as regards data sharing obligations. Where a registration procedure applies, Member States establish legal provisions that empower competent authorities to instruct providers of online platforms for short- term rentals to delete listings associated with units that are either offered without a valid registration number or with an invalid registration number. Similarly, when an authorization process is applicable, Member States should ensure that national legislation grants competent authorities the authority to compel providers of online short-term rental platforms to remove listings linked to units offered without the required authorization from the competent authority. In both scenarios, competent authorities shall be enabled to mandate platforms to furnish information. Member States should have the capacity to establish regulations pertaining to the respective penalties for non-compliance. _________________ 32 Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce') (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1).
Amendment 83 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) The Commission should periodically evaluate this Regulation and monitor its effects on the provision of short-term accommodation rental services offered through online short-term rental platforms in the Union. That evaluation should include any effects on providers of online short-term rental platforms and any effects of the increased availability, usability and quality of data on the content and proportionality of national, regional and local rules relating to the provision of short-term accommodation rental services. In order to obtain a broad view of developments in the sector, the evaluation should take into account the experiences of Member States and relevant stakeholders, including in particular the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation and enforcement mechanisms.
Amendment 89 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘ online short-term rental platform’ means an online platform, including advertising for short-term rental services and online research engines, within the meaning of Article 3, point (i), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, that allows guests to conclude distance contracts with hosts for the provision of short-term accommodation rental services;
Amendment 90 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) ‘online short-term rental advertising platform’ means a service within the meaning of Article 3, point (i) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, that includes advertising of short-term accommodation rental services on their platform. However, this service does not facilitate guests in entering into remote agreements with hosts for the purpose of procuring short-term accommodation rental services.
Amendment 95 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘competent authority’ means a national, regional or local authority of a Member State that is competent to manage andor enforce registration procedures, and/or to collect data on short-term accommodation rental services, or is responsible for ensuring compliance with the applicable rules of the Member States concerning the access to and provision of short-term accommodation rental services;
Amendment 106 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) hosts can register online at no cost.
Amendment 116 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 4 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 4 a (new)
4a. the unit's registration number, obtained by application of national, regional or local legislation
Amendment 117 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 4 b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 4 b (new)
4b. adapting the unit to disabled persons or persons with reduced mobility
Amendment 133 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Where the competent authorities have evidence that applicable national, regional or local legislation has been breached, they may initiate a platform inspection procedure. The competent authority shall request information that it considers relevant from the host in order to seek out and analyse the alleged infringements.
Amendment 139 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Article 6 – paragraph 8
8. The competent authority shall inform the hosts about the redress mechanisms available in relation to the steps taken pursuant to paragraphs 2 to 5, 5, 7 and 711.
Amendment 140 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Competent authorities have the authority to cross-check the information provided by online platforms regarding hosts who have claimed their listing is exempt from the registration process, as outlined in Article 7.1(b) and (d). They can also utilize the powers specified in paragraphs 6.2 to 6.9, if necessary, when dealing with the hosts concerned.
Amendment 143 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – title
Article 7 – title
Compliance by design for online short- term rental platforms
Amendment 146 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where the host declares that the unit offered for short-term accommodation rental services is located in an area where a registration procedure has been established or applies, design and organise their online interface in a way that enables hosts to let users to either (i) identify the unit through a registration number, and to ensure that hosts have provided a registration number prior to allowing the offering of the short- term accommodation rental services with respect to that unit or (ii) self declare that the unit they offer is exempt from the registration procedure applicable in the area where it is located;
Amendment 148 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) taking into account the list made available pursuant to Article 13(1), point (a), impede the listing of a unit located in an area where a registration procedure exists without a registration number and make reasonable efforts on quarterly basis to randomly check the validity of the registration number provided by the host, including through the use of the functionalities offered by the Single Digital Entry Points referred to in Article 10(2), point (b), after allowing the offering of the short-term accommodation rental services by the host.
Amendment 156 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Online short-term rental platforms shall include, in a specific section of the online interface that is directly and easily accessible, a reference to the information to be made available by Member States pursuant to Article 17(1). They should also make reasonable efforts to regularly and adequately inform and update hosts regarding the applicability of registration procedures, data sharing obligations, or authorization schemes in a given area. Additionally, a link to the Portal established under Article 13b (new) should be provided.
Amendment 158 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a (new)
Article7a Compliance by design for online short- term rental advertising platforms Where an online short-term rental advertising platform includes an advertising for a short-term accommodation rental service, it shall: (a) structure and arrange their online interface in such a manner that hosts advertising short-term accommodation rentals on the platform are required to self-declare whether the unit being offered is subject to an established or applicable registration procedure in the area. (b) where the host declares that the unit is subject to a registration procedure, the online platform should design its interface to allow hosts to either (i) identify the unit using a registration number and ensure that the number is provided before allowing the offering of short-term accommodation services for that unit, or (ii) declare that the unit is exempt from the registration procedure in the area where it is located. (c) conduct random checks on the hosts' declarations regarding the existence of a registration procedure, taking into consideration the list provided in Article 13(1)(a) and, if a registration procedure exists, verify the validity of the registration number provided by the host. This verification can be done using the functionalities offered by the Single Digital Entry Points mentioned in Article 10(2)(b), after allowing the host to offer the short-term accommodation rental services. (d) where the online platform includes advertisements from an online short-term rental platform that does not act as a host, it should design its interface to enable users to identify the unit through a registration number, if provided by the online short-term rental platform. (e) where the host declares that the unit is exempt from the applicable registration procedure, the online platform must, upon request from the relevant competent authority, provide the information provided by the host to allow the authority to verify its accuracy. This is done after allowing the host to offer the short-term accommodation rental services.
Amendment 162 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission mayshall adopt implementing acts laying down common technical specifications and procedures to ensure interoperability of solutions for the functioning of the Single Digital Entry Points and the seamless exchange of data, including the structure of the registration numbers and detailed addresses of the units. Registration numbers should be harmonised in all Member States. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 16(2). Additionally, the Commission shall also organise training and technical discussions, to ensure the proper functioning of the Single Digital Entry Points and the sharing of good practices.
Amendment 173 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. No later than 5 years after the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission shall evaluate this Regulation and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament, the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. This report shall be based on the evaluations submitted by national supervisory authorities pursuant to Article 14. and the data transmitted to Eurostat according to Article 12 (4)
Amendment 174 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) to the extent possible, the impact of this Regulation on the content and proportionality of national legislative, regulatory or administrative measures relating to access to and the provision of short-term accommodation rental services, including where such services are provided cross-border, as well as the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation and enforcement mechanisms.
Amendment 178 #
2022/0358(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [OP please insert date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. whilst the obligations imposed by this Regulation on online short-term rental platforms shall apply only as of [12] months from the moment the Member State concerned has set up its Single Digital Entry Points in line with the provisions of this Regulation.
Amendment 15 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulations (EU) No 260/2012 and (EU) 2021/1230 and Directive 98/26/EC as regards instant credit transfers in euro (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 31 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It would not be proportionate to impose on payment institutions and electronic money institutions an obligation to offer the service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers in euro, because those institutions cannot be admitted as participants in a payment system designated in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council36 . Those institutions may therefore experience difficulties in accessing the infrastructure necessary to execute instant credit transfers. It is therefore appropriate to excludeallow payment institutions and electronic money institutions from the obligationto act as participants in a payment system designated in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. A targeted amendment to Directive 98/26/EC would allow those institutions to access settlement systems and therefore be able to offer the services of sending and receiving instant credit transfers in euro. Those institutions, once in scope, would then be subject to the requirements of this Regulation. __________________ 36 Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45).
Amendment 102 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
PSPs that offer to their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving credit transfers to and from accounts denominated in euro shall offer to all their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers to and from accounts denominated in euro.
Amendment 104 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
PSPs in Member State whose currency is the euro that offer to their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving credit transfers shall offer to all their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers.
Amendment 107 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 115 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 5a – paragraph 1a (new)
(1a) PSPs shall be permitted to extend the execution time of instant credit transfers by the time necessary for currency-conversion with regards to instant credit transfers to and from payment accounts denominated in a currency other than euro.
Amendment 242 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5c – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Article 5c – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 281 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2a (new)
Article 2a (new)
Directive 98/26/EC
Article 2 – point b
Article 2 – point b
Article 2a Amendment to Directive 98/26/EC In Article 2 of Directive 98/26/EC, point (b) is amended as follows: “(b) ‘institution' shall mean: i. a credit institution as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Directive 77/780/EEC (1) including the institutions set out in the list in Article 2(2) thereof, or ii. a payment institution as defined in Article 4, point (4), of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, or iii. a e-money institutions as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Directive 2009/110/EC or iv. an investment firm as defined in point 2 of Article 1 of Directive 93/22/EEC (2 ) excluding the institutions set out in the list in Article 2(2)(a) to (k) thereof, or v. public authorities and publicly guaranteed undertakings, or vi. any undertaking whose head office is outside the Community and whose functions correspond to those of the Community credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions and investment firms as defined in the first, second, third and fourth indent, which participates in a system and which is responsible for discharging the financial obligations arising from transfer orders within that system. If a system is supervised in accordance with national legislation and only executes transfer orders as defined in the second indent of (i), as well as payments resulting from such orders, a Member State may decide that undertakings which participate in such a system and which have responsibility for discharging the financial obligations arising from transfer orders within this system, can be considered institutions, provided that at least three participants of this system are covered by the categories referred to in the first subparagraph and that such a decision is warranted on grounds of systemic risk;”
Amendment 284 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Directive 98/26/EC
Article 2 – point b
Article 2 – point b
Article 2a Amendment of Directive 98/26/EC In Article 2, point (b) of the Directive 98/26/EC, the following points are added: - a payment institution as defined in Article 4 (4) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, or - an electronic money institution as defined in Article 2 (2) of Directive 2009/110/EC."
Amendment 286 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 b (new)
Article 2 b (new)
Article 2b Transposition of amendments of Directive 98/26/EC Member States shall adopt, publish and apply, by 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 2a.
Amendment 37 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Versailles Declaration of 10-11 March 2022 of the Heads of States and Governments invited the Commission to propose by the end of May a REPowerEU plan to phase out the dependency on Russian fossil fuel imports, which was subsequently reiterated in the European Council Conclusions of 24-25 March 2022. This should be done well before 2030 in a way that is consistent with the EU’s Green Deal and the climate objectives for 2030 and 2050 enshrined in the European Climate Law. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 should therefore be amended to enhance its ability to support reforms and investments dedicated to diversifying energy supplies, in particular fossil fuels, nuclear and LNG, thereby strengthening the strategic autonomy of the Union alongside an open economy. Support should also be given to reforms and investments increasing the energy efficiency of the Member States’ economies and increasing the use of renewable energy, including hydrogen. Furthermore, in its Versailles Declaration of 10-11 March 2022, the European Council called for reducing EU strategic dependencies and invited, inter alia, the Commission to present options to address rising food prices and the issue of global food security as soon as possible.
Amendment 55 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The REPowerEU chapter should include new reforms and investments contributing to the REPowerEU aims and tackle, in a comprehensive manner, the crisis effects determined by the Russian military aggression against Ukraine. Furthermore, that chapter should contain an outline of other measures, financed from sources other than the Recovery and Resilience Facility, contributing to the energy-related objectives outlined in recital (3). The outline should cover measures whose implementation should take place between 1 February 2022 to 31 December 2026, the period during which the objectives set by this Regulation are to be achieved. As regards natural gas infrastructure, the investments and reforms of the REPowerEU chapters to diversify supply away from Russia should build on the needs currently identified through the assessment conducted and agreed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG), established in the spirit of solidarity as regards security of supply and take into account the reinforced preparedness measures taken to adapt to new geopolitical threats. Finally, the REPowerEU chapters should provide an explanation and a quantification of the effects of the combination of the reforms and investments financed by the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the other measures financed by other sources than the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
Amendment 60 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) In order to provide adequate and rapid response, Member States are encouraged to use all available funds to provide immediate and temporary support to SMEs and households for micro investments in energy efficiency improvements and in renewable energy self-generation, via vouchers or tax credits.
Amendment 62 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 b (new)
Recital 6 b (new)
(6 b) The REPowerEU chapter should equally represent an opportunity for the Member States to develop cross-border projects that accelerate the shift to renewables and that accelerate intra-EU pipeline expansions to fully utilise existing and future LNG regasification capacities to diversify natural gas supplies.
Amendment 64 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) In light of the current energy crisis, where high energy prices are aggravating the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, by further increasing the financial burden of consumers, in particular for households with low income or vulnerable companies, the REPowerEU chapters should include measures to help structurally address situations of energy poverty, through long-lasting investments and reforms. Such reforms and investments should provide a higher level of financial support in energy efficiency schemes, clean energy policies and schemes to reduce energy demand for those households and companies facing severe difficulties due to high energy bills. Energy demand-reduction measures taken by Member States should take into account the principles set by the Council Regulations on energy demand-reduction measures.
Amendment 76 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Member States are encouraged to complement and accompany the measures in the REPowerEU chapter with additional measures in line with the objectives of the chapter; in order to achieve them, Member States are encouraged to use additional Union funding, in particular the Innovation Fund, the Modernisation Fund, InvestEU and all remaining funds under the 2014- 2020 programming period; information on existing or planned Union financing should be included in the chapter.
Amendment 110 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18 a) Regulation (EU)2021/1755 should also be amended to allow for the possibility to transfer unused resources of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve in order to achieve the REPowerEU objectives.
Amendment 202 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21b – paragraph 1
Article 21b – paragraph 1
(1) Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred or allocated to the Facility, including from the Innovation Fund, Modernisation Fund, Just Transition Fund, as well as all remaining resources under the 2014-2020 MFF programming period, subject to the conditions set out in Article 26a of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and Article 81a of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115. Those resources shall be used exclusively for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 213 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21ba (new)
Article 21ba (new)
Article 21ba Resources from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve Resources allocated to Members States under the Brexit Adjustment Reserve may, at their request, be transferred to the Facility subject to the conditions set out in Article 8a of Regulation (EU) 2021/1755. Those resources shall be used exclusively for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 227 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) boosting energy efficiency in buildings, decarbonising industry, increasing production and uptake of LNG, nuclear, sustainable biomethane and renewable or fossil-free hydrogen and increasing the share of renewable energy,
Amendment 230 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) providing immediate and temporary support to households and SMEs for micro investments in energy efficiency improvements and in renewable energy self-generation, via vouchers or tax credits.
Amendment 231 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 21c – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) accelerating intra-EU pipeline expansions to fully utilise existing and future LNG regasification capacities to diversify natural gas supplies;
Amendment 275 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2021/241
Article 21d – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 21d – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2 a) The Commission shall also provide in the REPowerEU chapter of the annual report mentioned in paragraph (2) a set of recommendations for each Member State to accelerate the investments committed in their national recovery and resilience plans, after assessing the data available on final beneficiaries, and referring to best practices from other Member States.
Amendment 294 #
2022/0164(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2021/1755
Article 8a (new)
Article 8a (new)
Article 5 a Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2021/1755 Regulation (EU)2021/1755, is amended as follows: The following Article is inserted: Article 8a Transfer to the Recovery and Resilience Facility: (1) Member States may request the transfer of unused appropriations to the Recovery and Resilience Facility. (2) Transferred resources shall be implemented in accordance with the provision of Regulation(EU) 2021/241 and shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 29 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3 b) The Directive should take into account the challenges related to the sustainability of Member States’ public finances in the short term and therefore, avoid leading to substantial losses in Member States’ revenues.
Amendment 38 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to avoid a misuse of the deduction of the allowance on equity, it is necessary to lay down specific anti-tax avoidance rules. Such rules should target, in particular, schemes put in place to circumvent the conditions on which an equity increase qualifies for an allowance under this Directive, for instance, through the intra-group transfer of participations in associated enterprises. Such rules should also target schemes put in place to claim an allowance in the absence of any equity increase at group level. For example, intra- group debt financing or contributions in cash could be used for these purposes. Specific anti-tax avoidance rules should also prevent schemes from being put in place to claim that an increase in equity, and the corresponding allowance, is higher than it actually is, for example, through an increase in loan financing receivables or overvaluation of assets. Moreover, the general anti-tax abuse rule in Article 6 of Council Directive (EU) 2016/116415 applies against abusive acts which are not covered by the specific anti-tax avoidance framework of this Directive. Member States should also make sure the measures taken in the framework of this Directive are compliant with the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation. _________________ 15 Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 43 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) To effectively address the tax- related debt-equity bias in a manner sustainable for the Union’s public finances, an allowance for equity financing should be accompanied by a limitation on the deductibility of debt financing costs, except for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. An interest limitation rule should therefore limit the deductibility of exceeding borrowing costs and apply independently from the allowance. Given the different objectives between such a rule and the existing anti-tax avoidance rule on interest limitation of Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2016/1164, both rules should be maintained. Taxpayers should first calculate the deductibility of exceeding borrowing costs under this Directive and then under ATAD. In the event that the latter results in a lower amount of deductible exceeding borrowing costs, the taxpayer should deduct this lower amount and carry forward or back any difference between the two amounts in accordance with Article 4 of ATAD. This provision should be consistent with Directive 2016/1164 so that it does not hamper EU’s attractiveness to investors, or adds any complexity for companies.
Amendment 87 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. When implementing this Directive, Member States shall make sure the measures adopted are compliant with the guidance provided by the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) on notional interest deduction regimes.
Amendment 100 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 2027, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall review and assess the impact of this Directive on SME’s access to financing and on tax revenues in Member States, and whether there is a need to amend this Directive. Where appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by a review with a view to increasing the effectiveness of this Directive and a legislative proposal amending this Directive.
Amendment 101 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 2027, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall pay special attention to the link with other company tax legislation, namely a Directive ensuring a minimum effective tax rate for the global activities of large multinational groups and a Directive on Framework for Income Taxation in Europe (BEFIT).
Amendment 201 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In health systems, personal electronic health data is usually gathered in electronic health records, which typically contain a natural person’s medical history, diagnoses and treatment, medications, allergies, immunisations, as well as radiology images and laboratory results, spread between different entities from the health system (general practitioners, hospitals, pharmacies, care services). In order to enable that electronic health data to be accessed, shared and changed by the natural persons or health professionals, some Member States have taken the necessary legal and technical measures and set up centralised infrastructures connecting EHR systems used by healthcare providers and natural persons. Alternatively, some Member States support public and private healthcare providers to set up personal health data spaces to enable interoperability between different healthcare providers. Several Member States have also supported or provided health data access services for patients and health professionals (for instance through patients or health professional portals). They have also taken measures to ensure that EHR systems or wellness applications are able to transmit electronic health data with the central EHR system (some Member States do this by ensuring, for instance, a system of certification). However, not all Member States have put in place such systems, and the Member States that have implemented them have done so in a fragmented manner. In order to facilitate the free movement of personal health data across the Union and avoid negative consequences for patients when receiving healthcare in cross-border context, Union action is needed in order to ensure individuals have improved acess to their own personal electronic health data and are empowered to share it. The implementation cost for connecting healthcare professionals to the EHDS should not be carried by healthcare professionals alone. To this end, Member States should ensure that EU financial incentives as well as national ressources are evenly and fairly distributed.
Amendment 220 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Some Member States allow natural persons to add electronic health data to their EHRs or to store additional information in their separate personal health record that can be accessed by health professionals. However, this is not a common practice in all Member States and therefore should be established by the EHDS across the EU. Information inserted by natural persons may not be as reliable as electronic health data entered and verified by health professionals, therefore it should be clearly marked to indicate the source of such additional data until a relevant health professional validates the information, which would then be marked as confirmed by a health professional. Enabling natural persons to more easily and quickly access their electronic health data also further enables them to notice possible errors such as incorrect information or incorrectly attributed patient records and have them rectified using their rights under Regulation (EU) 2016/679. In such cases, natural person should be enabled to request rectification of the incorrect electronic health data online, immediately and free of charge, for example through the personal health data access service. Data rectification requests should be assessed and, where relevant, implemented by the data controllers on case by case basis, if necessary involving health professionals.
Amendment 232 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Natural persons may not want to allow access to some parts of their personal electronic health data while enabling access to other parts. Such selective sharing of personal electronic health data should be supported but the restrictions on information should be easily identifiable by health professionals in the EHR in order to take due regard to the fact that the information is incomplete, when treating the patient. However, such restrictions may have life threatening consequences and, therefore, access to personal electronic health data should be possible to protect vital interests as an emergency override. According to Regulation (EU) 2016/679, vital interests refer to situations in which it is necessary to protect an interest which is essential for the life of the data subject or that of another natural person. Processing of personal electronic health data based on the vital interest of another natural person should in principle take place only where the processing cannot be manifestly based on another legal basis. More specific legal provisions on the mechanisms of restrictions placed by the natural person on parts of their personal electronic health data should be provided by Member States in national law. Because the unavailability of the restricted personal electronic health data may impact the provision or quality of health services provided to the natural person, he/she should assume responsibility for the fact that the healthcare provider cannot take the data into account when providing health services.
Amendment 316 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36 a (new)
Recital 36 a (new)
(36 a) The uptake of real-world data and real-world evidence, including patient reported outcomes, for evidence-based regulatory and policy purposes as well as for research, health technology assessment and clinical objectives should be encouraged. Real-world data and real- world evidence have the potential to complement randomised clinical trial data and is particularly relevant when assessing safety and medicinal effectiveness of innovative products, such as, but not limited to Advanced Therapies Medicinal Products (ATMPs), particularly in the rare disease domain.
Amendment 349 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) The data holders in the context of secondary use of electronic health data can be public, non for profit or private health or care providers, public, non for profit and private organisations, associations or other entities, public and private entities that carry out research with regards to the health sector that process the categories of health and health related data mentioned above. In order to avoid a disproportionate burden on small entities, micro-enterprises are excluded from the obligation to make their data available for secondary use in the framework of EHDS. The public or private entities often receive public funding, from national or Union funds to collect and process electronic health data for research, statistics (official or not) or other similar purposes, including in area where the collection of such data is fragmented of difficult, such as rare diseases, cancer etc. Such data, collected and processed by data holders with the support of Union or national public funding, should be made available by data holders to health data access bodies, in order to maximise the impact of the public investment and support research, innovation, patient safety or policy making benefitting the society. In some Member States, private entities, including private healthcare providers and professional associations, play a pivotal role in the health sector. The health data held by such providers should also be made available for secondary use. At the same time, data benefiting from specific legal protection such as intellectual property from medical device companies or pharmaceutical companies should be provided by the level of confidentiality protection in accordance with TRIPS and Directive (EU) 2016/943. often enjoy copyright protection or similar types of protection. However, public authorities and regulators should have access to such data, for instance in the event of pandemics, to verify defective devices and protect human health. In times of severe public health concerns (for example, PIP breast implants fraud) it appeared very difficult for public authorities to get access to such data to understand the causes and knowledge of manufacturer concerning the defects of some devices. The COVID-19 pandemic also revealed the difficulty for policy makers to have access to health data and other data related to health. Such data should be made available for public and regulatory activities, supporting public bodies to carry out their legal mandate, while complying with, where relevant and possible, the protection enjoyed by commercial data. Specific rules in relation to the secondary use of health data should be provided. Data altruism activities may be carried out by different entities, in the context of Regulation […] [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final] and taking into account the specificities of the health sector.
Amendment 353 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40 a (new)
Recital 40 a (new)
(40 a) Clinical trials are of utmost importance for fostering innovation within Europe in the benefit of European patients. In order to incentivise continuous European leadership in this domain, the sharing of the clinical trials data through the EHDS for secondary use should not compromise the scientific integrity of and investment in these clinical trials, in line with Regulation (EU) 536/2014.
Amendment 367 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) The establishment of one or more health data access bodies, supporting access to electronic health data in Member States, is an essential component for promoting the secondary use of health- related data. Member States should therefore establish one or more health data access body, for instance to reflect their constitutional, organisational and administrative structure. However, one of these health data access bodies should be designated as a coordinator in case there are more than one data access body. Where a Member State establishes several bodies, it should lay down rules at national level to ensure the coordinated participation of those bodies in the EHDS Board. That Member State should in particular designate one health data access body to function as a single contact point for the effective participation of those bodies, and ensure swift and smooth cooperation with other health data access bodies, the EHDS Board and the Commission. Health data access bodies may vary in terms of organisation and size (spanning from a dedicated full-fledged organization to a unit or department in an existing organization) but should have the same functions, responsibilities and capabilities. Health data access bodies should not be influenced in their decisions on access to electronic data for secondary use. However, their independence should not mean that the health data access body cannot be subject to control or monitoring mechanisms regarding its financial expenditure or to judicial review. Each health data access body should be provided with the financial, technical and human resources, premises and infrastructure necessary for the effective performance of its tasks, including those related to cooperation with other health data access bodies throughout the Union. Given the central role of the health data access bodies in the context of secondary use of electronic health data, and especially the decision-making on granting or refusing a health data permit and preparing the data to make it available to health data users, their members and staff should have the necessary qualifications, experience and skills, in particular in the area of ethics, cybersecurity, protection of intellectual property and trade secrets, healthcare, scientific research, artificial intelligence and other relevant areas, as well as the protection of personal data and specifically data concerning health. In addition, the decision-making process regarding the granting or refusal of the health data permit should involve ethical considerations. Each health data access body should have a separate, public annual budget, which may be part of the overall state or national budget. In order to enable better access to health data and complementing Article 7(3) of Regulation […] of the European Parliament and of the Council [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final], Member States should entrust health data access bodies with powers to take decisions on access to and secondary use of health data. This could consist in allocating new tasks to the competent bodies designated by Member States under Article 7(1) of Regulation […] [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final] or in designating existing or new sectoral bodies responsible for such tasks in relation to access to health data.
Amendment 372 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) The health data access bodies should monitor the application of Chapter IV of this Regulation and contribute to its consistent application throughout the Union. For that purpose, the health data access bodies should cooperate with each other and with the Commission, without the need for any agreement between Member States on the provision of mutual assistance or on such cooperation. The health data access bodies should also cooperate with stakeholders, including patient organisations. Since the secondary use of health data involves the processing of personal data concerning health, the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 apply and the supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 should be tasked with enforcing these rules. Moreover, given that health data are sensitive data and in a duty of loyal cooperation, the health data access bodies should inform the data protection authorities of any issues related to the data processing for secondary use, including penalties. In addition to the tasks necessary to ensure effective secondary use of health data, the health data access body should strive to expand the availability of additional health datasets, support the development of AI in health and promote the development of common standards. They should apply tested state-of-the-art techniques that ensure electronic health data is processed in a manner that preserves the privacy of the information contained in the data for which secondary use is allowed, including techniques for pseudonymisation, anonymisation, generalisation, suppression and randomisation of personal data. In this regard, health data access bodies should cooperate across borders and converge on common definitions and techniques. Health data access bodies can prepare datasets to the data user requirement linked to the issued data permit. This includes rules for anonymization of microdata sets.
Amendment 375 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) Considering the administrative burden for health data access bodies toHealth data access bodies should comply with the obligations laid down in Article 14 paragraphs (1), (2), (3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and inform the natural persons whose data are used in data projects within a secure processing environment, t. The exceptions provided for in Article 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 shouldmay apply. TWherefore such exceptions are applied, health data access bodies should provide general information concerning the conditions for the secondary use of their health data containing the information items listed in Article 14(1) and, where necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing, Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, e.g. information on the purpose and the data categories processed, allowing natural persons to understand whether their data are being made available for secondary use pursuant to data permits. Exceptions from this rule should be made when the results of the research could assist in the treatment of the natural person concerned. In this case, the data user should inform the health data access body, which should inform the data subject or his health professionalhealth professional of the data subject concerned. Natural persons should be able to access the results of different research projects on the website of the health data access body, ideally in an easily searchable manner. The list of the data permits should also be made public. In order to promote transparency in their operation, each health data access body should publish an annual activity report providing an overview of its activities.
Amendment 400 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) Given the sensitivity of electronic health data, it is necessary to reduce risks on the privacy of natural persons by applying the data minimisation principle as set out in Article 5 (1), point (c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Therefore, the use of anonymised electronic health data which is devoid of any personal data should be made available when possible and if the data user asks it. If the data user needs to use personal electronic health data, it should clearly indicate in its request the justification for the use of this type of data for the planned data processing activity. The personal electronic health data should only be made available in pseudonymised format and the encryption key can only be held by the health data access body. Data users should not attempt to re-identify natural persons from the dataset provided under this Regulation, subject to administrative or possible criminal penalties, where the national laws foresee this. However, this should not prevent, in cases where the results of a project carried out based on a data permit has a health benefit or impact to a concerned natural person (for instance, discovering treatments or risk factors to develop a certain disease), the data users would inform the health data access body, which in turn would inform the relevant health professional of the concerned natural person(s). Moreover, the applicant can request the health data access bodies to provide the answer to a data request, including in statistical form. In this case, the data users would not process health data and the health data access body would remain sole controller for the data necessary to provide the answer to the data request.
Amendment 449 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 64 a (new)
Recital 64 a (new)
(64 a) Re-identification of natural persons should be considered a particularly serious breach of this Regulation. Member States should consider criminalising re-identification as well as disclosure of de-anonymised health data by health data users to serve as a deterrent measure.
Amendment 455 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
Recital 65
(65) In order to promote the consistent application of this Regulation, a European Health Data Space Board (EHDS Board) should be set up. The Commission should participate in its activities and chair it. It. The EHDS Board should contribute to the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union, including by helping Member State to coordinate the use of electronic health data for healthcare, certification, but also concerning the secondary use of electronic health data. Given that, at national level, digital health authorities dealing with the primary use of electronic health data may be different to the health data access bodies dealing with the secondary use of electronic health data, the functions are different and there is a need for distinct cooperation in each of these areas, the EHDS Board should be able to set up subgroups dealing with these two functions, as well as other subgroups, as needed. An advisory forum should be set up to advise the EHDS Board it in the fulfilment of its tasks by providing stakeholder input in matters pertaining to this Regulation. The advisory forum should be composed of representatives of patients, health professionals, industry, scientific researchers and academia, have a balanced composition and represent the views of different relevant stakeholders. Commercial and non-commercial interests should be balanced. For an efficient working method, the digital health authorities and health data access bodies should create networks and links at national level with different other bodies and authorities, but also at Union level. Such bodies could comprise data protection authorities, cybersecurity, eID and standardisation bodies, as well as bodies and expert groups under Regulations […], […], […] and […] [Data Governance Act, Data Act, AI Act and Cybersecurity Act].
Amendment 467 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the European Health Data Space (‘EHDS’) by providing for rules, interoperable common standards and, practices, and infrastructures and a governance framework for the primary and secondary use of electronic health data.
Amendment 472 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) strengthens the rights of natural persons in relation to the availability, sharing and control of their electronic health data;
Amendment 481 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) manufacturers and suppliers of EHR systems and products claiming interoperability with EHR systems, including medical devices, high-risk AI systems and wellness applications placed on the market and put into service in the Union and the users of such products;
Amendment 526 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) ‘secondary use of electronic health data’ means: (i) the processing of electronic health data for purposes set out in Chapter IV of this Regulation. The data used may includewhich was personal electronic health data initially collected in the context of primary use, but also electronic health data collected for the purpose of the secondary use;for purposes set out in Chapter IV of this Regulation, thereby constituting further processing within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679; or (ii) the processing of electronic health data which does not fall under (i) and was originally collected for the purposes set out in Chapter IV of this Regulation.
Amendment 583 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point z
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point z
(z) ‘health data user’ means a natural or legal person who has lawful access toas well as Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, who has been granted access, in accordance with this Regulation, to one or more of the categories of personal or non- personal electronic health data for secondary use;
Amendment 602 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point ae a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point ae a (new)
(ae a) ‘ real world evidence’ (RWE) means data that are collected outside the constraints of conventional randomised clinical trials.
Amendment 606 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point ae b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point ae b (new)
(ae b) ‘real-world data’ (RWD) means routinely collected data relating to patient health status or the delivery of healthcare from a variety of sources other than traditional clinical trials.
Amendment 618 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -3 (new)
Article -3 (new)
Article -3 Scope For the purpose of this Chapter, health data holder shall be understood only as data holder from health sector providing healthcare.
Amendment 652 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. In addition to the electronic services referred to in paragraph 5 point (a), Member States shall also establish easily accessible support services for natural persons with adequately trained staff dedicated to assist them with exercising their rights referred to in this Article.
Amendment 656 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. Natural persons may insert their electronic health data in their own EHR or in that of natural persons whose health information they can access, through electronic health data access services or applications linked to these services. That information shall be marked as inserted by the natural person or by his or her representative until a relevant health professional validates the information, which would then be marked as confirmed by a healthcare professional.
Amendment 667 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Natural persons shall have the right to give access to or request a data holder from the health or social security sectorsector and providing healthcare to transmit their electronic health data to aor only specific part of health data identified by the requesting natural persons or necessary for the purpose at stake to a health data recipient of their choice from the health or social security sector, immediately, free of charge and without hindrance from the data holder or from the manufacturers of the systems used by that holder.
Amendment 671 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
When a natural person makes the request for transmission, the health data holder shall have the obligation to comply with it, in accordance with Articles 6(1) and 9(2) point (a) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 679 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 9
Article 3 – paragraph 9
9. Notwithstanding Article 6(1), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, natural persons shall have the right to restrict access of selected health professionals to all or a specific part of their electronic health data. Member States shall establish the rules and specific safeguards regarding such restriction mechanisms. Such restriction shall be easily identifiable in the EHR. When restricting the information, natural persons shall be made aware that restricting access may impact the provision of healthcare provied to them. Member States shall establish the rules and specific safeguards regarding such restriction mechanisms, including the conditions of medical liability, respecting the rules provided for by Article 18 (2) and (3) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 concerning the right to restriction of data processing. The Commission shall establish guidelines regarding medical liability when diagnosing and treating patients based on incomplete information.
Amendment 694 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 10
Article 3 – paragraph 10
10. Natural persons shall have the right to obtain information on the healthcare providers and health professionals that have accessed their electronic health data in the context of healthcareproviding healthcare, including pursuant to Article 4(4) of this Regulation. The information shall be provided immediately and free of charge through electronic health data access services and stored for at least 3 years.
Amendment 700 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 10 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Natural persons shall have the possibility to choose whether to receive notifications about which health professional and when have accessed their personal electronic health data, as well as the periodicity of such notifications. There should be an automatic notification for situations when a health professional accesses the personal electronic health data of a natural person for the first time.
Amendment 701 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 11
Article 3 – paragraph 11
Amendment 726 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notwithstanding the national rules established pursuant to paragraph 2, natural persons shall be able to easily give acces to their electronic health data to a selected health professional through the health data access services, if they wish so.
Amendment 730 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that access to at least the priority categories of electronic health data referred to in Article 5 is made available to health professionals through health professional access services. Health professionals who are in possession of recognised electronic identification means shall have the right to use those health professional access services, free of chargeshall have access to electronic health data through health professional access services for the sole purpose of providing healthcare treatment, including relevant administration, and only through recognised electronic identification and authentication means, free of charge. The electronic health data in the electronic health records shall be structured in a user-friendly manner to allow for an easy use by health professionals.
Amendment 743 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Where access to electronic health data has been restricted by the natural person, pursuant to Article 3(9), the healthcare provider or health professionals shall not be informed of the content of the restricted electronic health data without prior authorisationexplicit consent as defined in Article 9(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 by the natural person, including where the provider or professional is informed of the existence and nature of the restricted electronic health data. In cases where processing is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person, the healthcare provider or health professional may get access to the restricted electronic health data, in line with Article 6(1)(d) of of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Following such access, the healthcare provider or health professional shall inform the data holder and the natural person concerned or his/her guardians that access to electronic health data had been granted. Member States’ law may add additional safeguards.
Amendment 789 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. For the purpose of paragraph 1, the Commission shall consult and cooperate with relevant stakeholders, including patients’ representatives, healthcare providers, health professionals, industry associations, national competence centres, as well as other Union and national authorities with competence in relevant areas, to encourage and contribute to the elaboration and adoption of a European electronic health record exchange format.
Amendment 793 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall ensure that the priority categories of personal electronic health data referred to in Article 5 are available in the language of the patient and the treating health professional.
Amendment 827 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Where a Member State acceptenables the provision of telemedicine services, it shall, under the same conditions and in a non- discriminatory manner, accept the provision of the services of the same type by healthcare providers located in other Member States.
Amendment 854 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point k
(k) offer, in compliance with national legislation, telemedicine services and ensure that such services are easy to use, accessible to different groups of natural persons and health professionals, including natural persons with disabilities, dounder the same notn- discriminateory conditions and offer the possibility of choosing between in person and digital services;
Amendment 860 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point m
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point m
(m) cooperate with other relevant entities and bodies at national or Union level, to ensure interoperability, data portability and security of electronic health data, as well as with stakeholders representatives through relevant associations, including patients’ representatives of patients, healthcare providers, health professionals, industry associations;
Amendment 879 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall ensure that each digital health authority is provided with the human, technical and financial resources, premises and infrastructure necessary for the effective performance of its tasks and exercise of its powers. Digital health authorities and their members and staff shall have the qualifications, experience and skills required to carry out their duties and exercise their powers.
Amendment 888 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. In the performance of its tasks, the digital health authority shall actively cooperate wiand consult with essential health stakeholders’ representatives, including patients’ representatives, health professionals and healthcare providers. Members of the digital health authority shall avoid any conflicts of interest.
Amendment 1086 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Where a finding of a market surveillance authortiy, or a serious incident it is informed of, concerns personal data protection, the market surveillance authority shall, without undue delay, inform and cooperate with the relevant supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 1101 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -31 (new)
Article -31 (new)
Article -31 Interoperability of wellness applications with EHR systems 1. Manufacturers of wellness applications may claim interoperability with an EHR system, after relevant conditions are met. When this is the case, the users of such wellness applications shall be duly informed about such interoperability and its effects. 2. The interoperability of wellness applications with EHR systems shall not mean automatic sharing or transmission of all or part of the health data from the wellness application with the EHR system. The sharing or transmission of such data shall only be possible pursuant to and in line with Article 3(6) of this Regulation and interoperability shall be limited exclusively to this end. The manufacturers of wellness applications claiming interoperability with an EHR system shall ensure that the user is able to choose which part of health data from the wellness application they want to insert in the EHR system. 3. Wellness applications shall not be able to access the information in EHRs nor extract any information from it.
Amendment 1110 #
2022/0140(COD)
6. If the wellness application is embedded in a device, the accompanying label shall be placed on the device and in the case of software a digital label. 2D barcodes may also be used to display the label.
Amendment 1125 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -33 (new)
Article -33 (new)
Article -33 Scope This Chapter shall apply to situations of secondary use of electronic health data where a health data user seeks access to such data, as referred to in Article 33, from one or more health data holders as defined in Article 2 (y) of this Regulation.
Amendment 1126 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -33 a (new)
Article -33 a (new)
Article -33 a Rights of natural persons in relation to the secondary use of electronic health data Natural persons shall have the right to opt-out from sharing their electronic health data for secondary use. A mechanism shall be put in place to allow natural persons the flexibility to determine the categories of electronic health data and/or purposes from which they wish to opt out. Such mechanism shall be easily accessible, comprehensible and actionable.
Amendment 1127 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – title
Article 33 – title
Minimum categories of electronic health data for secondary use
Amendment 1176 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) person generated electronic health data, including from medical devices, wellness applications or other digital health applications;
Amendment 1188 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) electronic health data from clinical trialsfully concluded or terminated clinical trials, in accordance with Regulation 536/2014;
Amendment 1224 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. The electronic health data referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover data processed for the provision of health or care or for public health, research, innovation, policy making, official statistics, patient safety or regulatory purposes, including real-world data and real-world evidence, collected by entities and bodies in the health or care sectors, including public and private providers of health or care, entities or bodies performing research in relation to these sectors, and Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.
Amendment 1235 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. Electronic health data entailing protected intellectual property and trade secrets from private enterprisehealth data holders shall be made available for secondary use. Where such data is made available for secondary use, all technical and organisational measures necessary to preserve the confidentiality of IP rights and confidentiality of trade secrets shall be taken by the health data access body and in consultation with the data holder. This regulation is without prejudice to existing relevant Union legislation, including Directive 2004/48/EC, Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive (EU) 2016/943 and Directive (EU) 2019/790.
Amendment 1247 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4 d (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Public sector bodies or Union institutions, agencies and bodies that obtain access to electronic health data entailing IP rights and trade secrets in the exercise of the tasks conferred to them by Union law or national law, shall take all specific technical and organisational measures necessary to preserve the confidentiality of such data.
Amendment 1302 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to support public sector bodies or Union institutions, agencies and bodies including regulatory authorities, in the health or care sector to carry out their tasks defined in their mandates, including optmising patient pathway;
Amendment 1310 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) higher education or, continuing proffessional development or higher education teaching activities in health or care sectors;
Amendment 1313 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) scientific research related to health or care sectorsdemonstrably linked to health or care sectors, such as prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation or healthcare management, including fundamental, exploratory or applied healthcare research;
Amendment 1324 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) development and innovation activities for products or services demonstrably contributing to public health or social security, or ensuring high levels of quality and safety of health or care, of medicinal products or of medical devices, including scientific research into their efficiency and efficacy and post-market safety monitoring;
Amendment 1350 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) improving delivery of care, optimising patient pathway and providing personalised healthcare consisting in assessing, maintaining or restoring the state of health of natural persons, based on the health data of other natural persons.
Amendment 1367 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Seeking access to and processing electronic health data obtained via a data permit issued pursuant to Article 46 for the following purposes shall be prohibited and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions:
Amendment 1371 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) taking decisions detrimental to a natural person or a group of natural persons based on their electronic health data; in order to qualify as “decisions”, they must produce legal effects or similarly significantly affect those natural persons;
Amendment 1389 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) advertising or marketing activities towards health professionals, organisations in health or natural persons;
Amendment 1418 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Any other misuse of electronic health data, including its use for permissible purposes other than those specified in the data permit or data request, shall also be prohibited and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Amendment 1427 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Each health data access body shall contribute to the consistent application of this Regulation throughout the Union. For that purpose, the health data access bodies shall cooperate with each other and with the supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 as well as with the Commission and where relevant with the EDPB and the EDPS.
Amendment 1434 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that each health data access body is provided with adequathe human, technical and financial resources, premises and infrastructure necessary for the effective performance of its tasks and the exercise of its powers, including those related to the participation in the EHDS Board.
Amendment 1477 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) take all measures necessary to preserve IP rights and the confidentiality of IP rights and of trade secrets;
Amendment 1537 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 37 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The EDPB shall provide health data acces bodies with specific guidelines and minimum standards of anonymisation and pseudonymisation for the purposes in this Regulation in order to ensure the same level of quality of anonymisation and pseudonymisation across Member States. The guidelines shall be based on state-of- the-art technology in this regard, which in turn shall be used by the health data access bodies when carrying out their task of anonymisation or pseudonymisation of electronic health data. The guidelines shall be regularly updated, in line with technological progress in this field.
Amendment 1540 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Health data access bodies shall make publicly available and easily searchable and accessible the conditions under which electronic health data is made available for secondary use, with information concerning:
Amendment 1547 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the arrangementmodalities for natural persons to exercise their rights in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 1556 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. Health data access bodies shall not be obliged to provide the specific information undercomply with the obligations laid down in Article 14(1) to (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Natural persons shall have the possibility to choose whether to receive notifications when their data are being used for secondary purpose, as well as the periodicity of such notifications.Where, with regards to obligations laid down in Article 14(1) to (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 to eaca health ndatural person concerning the use of their data for projects subject to a data permit and shall provide general public information on all the data permits issueda access body decides to make use of the exception laid down in Article 14(5), point (b), of the same Regulation, it shall make sure to make the information as referred to in Article 14(1) to (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 publicly available on its website in an aggregated form, allowing natural persons to understand whether their data are being made available for secondary use pursuant to Article 46data permits.
Amendment 1564 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3
Article 38 – paragraph 3
3. Where a health data access body is informed by a health data user of a clinically significant finding that may impact onnfluence the health status of a natural person, as referred to in Article 41a(5) of this Regulation, the health data access body mayshall inform the natural person and his or , where applicable, the treating health professional of the natural person concerned about that finding. Where relevant, ther treating health professional about that findingshall take due regard to the expressed wish of the natural person not to be informed.
Amendment 1662 #
2022/0140(COD)
3. Where health data access bodies find that a data user or data holder does not comply with the requirements of this Chapter, they shall immediately notify the data user or data holder of those findings and shall give it the opportunity to state its views within 2 months.4 weeks. Where the finding of non-compliance concerns personal electronic health data, the health data access body shall immediately inform supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of this finding to ensure application and enforcement of this Regulation and relevant provisions of the aforementioned Regulations, including penalties;
Amendment 1667 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 4
Article 43 – paragraph 4
4. Health data access bodies shall have the power to revoke the data permit issued pursuant to Article 46 and stop the affected electronic health data processing operation carried out by the data user in order to ensure the cessation of the non- compliance referred to in paragraph 3, immediately or within a reasonable time limit, and shall take appropriate and proportionate measures aimed at ensuring compliant processing by the data users. In this regard, tThe health data access bodies shall be able, where appropriate, to revoke the data permit and to exclude the data user from any access to electronic health data within the EHDS for a period of up to 5 years.
Amendment 1686 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 10
Article 43 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission mayshall issues guidelines on penalties to be applied by the health data access bodies.
Amendment 1707 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3
Article 44 – paragraph 3
3. Where the purpose of the data user’sdata user has demonstrated that the purpose of processing cannot be achieved with anonymised data, taking into account the information provided by the data userin line with Article 46(1c), the health data access bodies shall provide access to electronic health data in pseudonymised format. The information necessary to reverse the pseudonymisation shall be available only to the health data access body. Data users shall not re- identify the electronic health data provided to them in pseudonymised format. The data user’s failure to respect the health data access body’s measures ensuring pseudonymisation shall be subject to appropriatconsidered a particularly serious breach of this Regulation and shall be subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.
Amendment 1727 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
(-a) the applicant´s identity, description of professional functions and operations, including the identity of the concrete persons who will have access to electronic health data, if a data permit is granted;
Amendment 1732 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a detailed plan and explanation of the intended use of the electronic health data, including for which of the purposes referred to in Article 34(1) access is sought;
Amendment 1736 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) a declaration that the applicant has sufficient experience to manage the intended uses of the data requested, consistent with ethical practice and applicable laws and regulations;
Amendment 1740 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
(a b) a detailed explanation of the expected benefits related to the use;
Amendment 1741 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a description of the requested electronic health data, their timeframe, format and data sources, where possible, including geographical coverage where data is requested from several Member States;
Amendment 1744 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an indication whether electronic health data shouldneed to be made available in an an pseudonymised format;
Amendment 1746 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) a description of the safeguards planned to prevent any other use or misuse of the electronic health data, including attempts to re-identify natural persons whose data are part of the dataset;
Amendment 1754 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) where applicable, information on the assessment of ethical aspects of the processing and evidence of ethics approval obtained by the competent ethics committee in line with national law;
Amendment 1759 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point h b (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point h b (new)
(h b) a declaration that the intended uses of the data requested do not pose a risk of stigmatisation or dignitary harm to both individuals and the groups implicated in the dataset requested;
Amendment 1814 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 3
Article 46 – paragraph 3
3. A health data access body shall issue or refuse a data permit within 2 months of receiving the data access application. By way of derogation from that Regulation […] [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final](EU) 2022/868, the health data access body may extend the period for responding to a data access application by 2a maximum of 3 additional months where necessary, taking into account the complexity of the request. In such cases, the health data access body shall notify the applicant as soon as possible that more time is needed for examining the application, together with the reasons for the delay. Where a health data access body fails to provide a decision within the time limit, the data permit shall be issued.
Amendment 1884 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1
Article 48 – paragraph 1
By derogation from Article 46 of this Regulation, a data permit shall not be required to access the electronic health data under this Article. When carrying out those tasks under Article 37 (1), points (b) and (c), tby the European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) to access the electronic health data under this Chapter. The health data access body shall inform public sector bodies and the Union institutions, offices, agencies and bodies, about the availability of data within 2 months of the data access application, in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation […] [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final]EMA, ECDC, or HERA about the availability of data within 2 months of the data access application. By way of derogation from that Regulation […] [Data Governance Act COM/2020/767 final ], the health data access body may extend the period by 2 additional months where necessary, taking into account the complexity of the request. The health data access body shall make available the electronic health data to the data user within 2 months after receiving them from the data holders, unless it specifies that it will provide the data within a longer specified timeframe.
Amendment 1914 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4
Article 50 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, provide for the technical, information security, confidentiality, data protection and interoperability requirements for the secure processing environments, in consultation with ENISA. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisoryexamination procedure referred to in Article 68(2a).
Amendment 1960 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 52 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 1986 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 a (new)
Article 59 a (new)
Article 59 a Digital health literacy and digital health access 1. In order to ensure successful implementation of the EHDS, Member States shall put in place educational programmes aimed at increasing digital health literacy and relevant competences and skills. Those programmes shall be tailored to the needs of specific groups, including patients and health professionals, and shall be developed and reviewed, and where necessary updated, on a regular basis in consultation and cooperation with relevant experts and stakeholders. 2. Member States shall measure, on a regular basis, the digital health literacy of health professionals, patients as well as persons in general. 3. Member States shall organise awareness-raising campaigns to ensure that all specific groups are informed about the importance of digital health literacy as well as educational programmes available to them pursuant to paragraph 1. 4. Member States as well as the Commission shall take all the necessary measures to ensure that natural persons, and specifically patients and health professionals, are informed about the EHDS, its primary and secondary components, functionalities and conditions as well as their rights within EHDS. 5. Member States shall ensure that all natural persons have access to the infrastructure necessary for the effective management of their electronic health data, both within primary and secondary use.
Amendment 2022 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1
Article 64 – paragraph 1
1. A European Health Data Space Board (EHDS Board) is hereby established to facilitate cooperation and the exchange of information among Member States. The EHDS Board shall be composed of th: (a) one high level representatives of digital health authorities andof all the Member States; and (b) one high level representative of health data access bodies of all the Member States. OtWhere a Member State has designated several health data access bodies, the coordinating health data access body shall be part of the EHDS Board; and (c) EDPB and EDPS. The EHDS Board shall be aided by an advisory forum as referred to in Article 65a. EMA, ECDC, ENISA shall be invited by the Board to join the meeting where the issues discussed are of relevance to their respective mandates or tasks. Other national authorities, including market surveillance authorities referred to in Article 28, European Data Protection Board and European Data Protection Supervisor may be invited to the meetings, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them. The Board may also invite experts and observers to attend its meetings, and may cooperate with other external experts as appropriate. Other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, research infrastructures and other similar structures shall have an observer role.
Amendment 2044 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 a (new)
Article 64 a (new)
Article 64a Advisory forum 1. An advisory forum shall be established by the EHDS Board to advise it in the fulfilment of its tasks by providing stakeholder input in matters pertaining to this Regulation. 2. EMA, ECDC, JRC shall be permanent members of the advisory forum. 3. The advisory forum shall be composed of representatives of patients, health professionals, industry, scientific researchers and academia. The advisory forum shall have a balanced composition and represent the views of different relevant stakeholders. The composition of the advisory forum shall be balanced between commercial and non-commercial interests and, within the commercial interests, it shall be balanced between large companies, SMEs and start-ups. Focus on primary and secondary use of electronic health data shall also be balanced. 4. Members of the advisory forum shall be appointed by the Commission following a public call for interest and a transparent selection procedure, in consultation with the European Parliament. 5. The term of office of the members of the advisory forum shall be two years and it shall not be renewable more than twice consecutively. 6. The advisory forum may establish standing or temporary subgroups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific questions related to the objectives of this Regulation. 7. The advisory forum shall draw up its rules of procedure and elect two co- Chairs from among its members, one of them being from its permanent members. Their term of office shall be two years, renewable once. 8. The advisory forum shall hold regular meetings. The advisory forum can invite relevant experts and other relevant stakeholders to its meetings. The Chair of the EHDS Board may attend, ex officio, the meetings of the advisory forum. 9. In fulfilling its role as set out in paragraph 1, the advisory forum may prepare opinions, recommendations or written contributions. 10. The advisory forum shall prepare an annual report of its activities. That report shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 2088 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1
Article 69 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Specific attention shall be given to penalties for serious breaches of this Regulation, as referred to in Article 41a(3) and Article 44(3). Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules and measures by date of application of this Regulation and shall notify the Commission without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them. 2. Penalties referred to in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the penalties established pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. 3. The Commission shall provide Member States with guidelines and recommendations on the types and levels of penalties in order to prevent forum shopping and ensure fair enforcement, especially in cross-border cases. 4. Member States are encouraged to consider criminalising re-identification of anonymised data.
Amendment 2098 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. After 5 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out a targeted evaluation of this Regulation especially with regards to Chapter III, including the need to extend interoperability possibilities between EHR systems and electronic health data access services other than those established by the Member States, the possibility to expand the access to MyHealth@EU infrastructure to third countries and international organisations, the implementation and use by natural persons of the opt-out mechanism in secondary use as referred to in Article - 33a, the use and implementation of the right referred to in Article 3(9), the implementation of Articles 33 and 34 as well as the application of fees as referred to in Article 42, and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for its amendment. The evaluation shall include an assessment of the self-certification of EHR systems and reflect on the need to introduce a conformity assessment procedure performed by notified bodies.
Amendment 2106 #
2022/0140(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. After 2 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out a targeted evaluation of the Union funding made available for the setting up of the European Health Data Space as well as an evaluation of funding allocated to this end by Member States, and where appropriate, consider further measures in this regard.
Amendment 396 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘valuesupply chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationshippartners of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘valuesupply chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities;
Amendment 427 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o
Amendment 436 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p
Amendment 491 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to identify actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from their own operations or those of their subsidiaries and, where related to their valuesupply chains, fromthose of their established business relationshippartners, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4.
Amendment 500 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. For the purpose of fulfilling the obligation in paragraph 1, companies may map all areas of their own operations, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to their supply chains, those of their established business partners. Based on the results of that mapping, companies may carry out an in-depth assessment of the areas where adverse impacts were identified to be most likely to be present or most significant.
Amendment 513 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall ensure that companies, when fulfilling the obligation in paragraph 1, are obliged to assess indirect business partners in-depth only when the companies have factual knowledge of actual or potential adverse impacts arising from the activities of the respective indirect business partner.
Amendment 518 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. When companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, identification of actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts shall be carried out only before providing that service..
Amendment 793 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Amendment 848 #
Amendment 849 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that a companies arey is liable for damages to an injured person if:
Amendment 852 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) theit intentionally or negligently failed to comply with thean obligations laid down in Articles 7 and 8or 8 that has protective effect towards the injured person and;
Amendment 853 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as a result of this failure an adverse impact that should have been identifieddeath, personal injury, prevented, mitigated, brought to an end or its extent minimised through the appropriate measures laid down in Articles 7 and 8 occurred and led to damagestriction of personal liberty, or damage to or destruction of any item of property was caused.
Amendment 862 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 863 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 869 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
(a) the industry or sector initiative is based on a multi-stakeholder approach;
Amendment 870 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) the implemented standard was set up and is able to ensure that companies are regularly in full compliance with the obligations laid out in Article 7 and 8; and
Amendment 871 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
(a b) the implemented standard was approved by a competent public authority at the time of the death, personal injury, restriction of personal liberty or damage to or destruction of any item of property.
Amendment 872 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 879 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Amendment 886 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 4
Article 22 – paragraph 4
Amendment 888 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 4
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The civil liability rulesof a company for damages arising under this Directiveprovision shall be without prejudice to Union or national rules on civil liability related to adverse human rights impacts or to adverse environmental impacts that provide for liability in situations not covered by or providing for stricter liability than this Directivethe civil liability of its subsidiaries or of any direct and indirect business partners in the value chain.
Amendment 891 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Amendment 892 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that theNo punitive damages shall be awarded under this provision. The calculation of damages and the general prerequisites and conditions of civil liability not provided for in this provisions of national law transposing this Article is of overriding mandatory application in cases where the law applicable to claims to that effect is not the law of a Member Stat shall be governed by the substantive law of the respective Member State. The civil liability under this provision shall be without prejudice to any applicable Union or national liability that provides for liability in situations not covered by or providing for stricter liability than this Directive.
Amendment 893 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Member States shall ensure that the liability provided for in provisions of national law transposing this Article is of overriding mandatory application in cases where the law applicable to claims to that effect is not the law of a Member State.
Amendment 912 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25
Article 25
Amendment 918 #
2022/0051(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26
Article 26
Amendment 88 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the packages of reforms and investments, particularly growth-enhancing ones under the RRF, should also generate EU added value; improve EU competitiveness ; emphasises that the packages of reforms and investments under the RRF should also contribute to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 111 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is concerned, however, that only seven Member States have requested loans amounting to a total of EUR 166 billion out of the EUR 385.8 billion avEmphasises that all grants from the RRF should be invested in the implementation period of 2021-2026 to realise the EU’s objectives of sustailnable for loans, leaving a considerable amount available should Member States require loans at a later stage; is preoccupied that the limited interest for the loan component may lead to lost opportunities and prevent the RRF from reaching its full potential;economic growth, resilience and competitiveness; urges Member States to facilitate private investments in connection to the RRF-funded projects in order to increase volume of the recovery plan and close the major investment gap in the fields of green and digital transition.
Amendment 129 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Tasks the Commission with analysing: a) the reasons why thsome Member States have not requested logrants to the full extent of their allocation;, b) the extent of loans adopted by central banks in Member States to supplement RRF grants and c) private investments generated from RRF-funded projects.
Amendment 152 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Looks forward to more granular and disaggregated data allowing for a better understanding of the additionality impacts of the RRF; regrets the lack of public information on how the NRRPs comply with the requirement of additionality; urges the Member States to provide detailed information to the Commission in order to ensure effective reporting of the impact of the RRF; ; stresses the importance of a transparent and public score board and thus the need of benchmarking reforms and investments
Amendment 216 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Regrets the lack of information on how NRRPs contribute to achieving climate neutrality as outlined in the European Climate Law; calls on the Commission to include data in the national scoreboards on how the investments in the NRRPs reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Member States.
Amendment 304 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31 a. Is concerned about the lack of control of additionality
Amendment 363 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Welcomes the launch in December 2021 of the recovery and resilience scoreboard, which will allow every citizen to monitor the implementation of the RRF; Calls for the Commission to launch its Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard in April 2022 as planned and ensure updates of the scoreboard twice a year in accordance with the RRF regulation; urges the Commission to enforce that Member States should provide the data necessary to report on the progress with regard to the six pillars of the RRF regulation and thereby enable every citizen to monitor the implementation of the RRF.
Amendment 371 #
2021/2251(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Notes that Member States’ NRRPs report on their communication strategies; deplores however that, without a clear standard, such communication campaigns are envisaged to be very different, thus limiting the visibility of the RRF and EU funding overall; Calls for the Commission and Member States to ensure that the mandatory single web spaces on NRRPs include: a) public procurement plans to improve transparency and enable companies across Member States to tender for projects and b) supplier list open for registration so that main suppliers will have a better overview of potential subsuppliers in other Member States;
Amendment 3 #
2021/2201(INI)
— having regard to the OECD draft new tax transparency framework for crypto-assets (CARF) and amendments to the Common Reporting Standard 1a which were submitted to public consultation, _________________ 1a https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of- tax-information/public-consultation- document-crypto-asset-reporting- framework-and-amendments-to-the- common-reporting-standard.pdf
Amendment 139 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that it is necessary to amend the scope of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation5 (DAC8) so that European legislators can further assess if other categories of income and assets such as crypto-assets are to be included; calls on the OECD to adopt without any further delay a new definition of a reporting standards and exchange of information which should then be included in the revised DAC 8; thereafter encourages the Commission to present the DAC8 proposal without any delay; _________________ 5 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1.
Amendment 3 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
— having regard to the European Securities and Markets Authority's final report of 23 September 2020 on the MAR Review,
Amendment 28 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas complex refund procedures increase the administrative burden for cross-border investments, particularly SME and individual investors, and may create an obstacle to market integration and the advancement of the Capital Markets Union;
Amendment 49 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the cum-ex and cum-cum schemes both involve reclaims of dividend withholding tax to which the beneficiaries were not entitled and have been ruled illegal; together the schemes are estimated to have imposed a total cost to taxpayers of about EUR 55 billion between 2001 and 2012 in the 11 Member States concerned;
Amendment 65 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the agreement reached by the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework on a two-pillar reform, including a global minimum effective tax rate; considers this an important step towards ending the practice of shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions; regrets the fact that the scope is limited to multinational enterprises with a global consolidated turnover of at least EUR 750 millcalls on the Commission to bring forward a proposal to implement the international agreement in EU law that respects the spirit of the agreement and not to go beyond what has been agreed so as to preserve the competitiveness of the Union;
Amendment 82 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to set up a harmonised withholding tax framework that ensures that all dividend, interest and royalties payments flowing out the EU are taxed at a minimum effective tax ratewill reduce the complexity for investors and stem the practice of "treaty-shopping"; the Commission may consider mesures such as the standardisation of the reclaims procedure or the introduction of a minimum effective tax rate on all dividend, interest and royalties payments flowing out the EU;
Amendment 92 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the proposal by 10 Member States to include an effective minimum tax rate for royalties and interest in the context of the IRD; urges the Council to swiftly resume and conclude the negotiations on the IRD and encohas been a contributing factor to the stalling of negotiations on the reform of the Directive; urages the inclusion of such a measure in the announced directive for the implementCouncil to swiftly resume and conclude the negotiations of Pillar IIn the IRD;
Amendment 98 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 123 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation and mutual assistance between tax authorities, financial market supervisory authorities and, where appropriate, law enforcement bodies regarding the detection and prosecution of withholding tax reclaim schemes; takes note in this regard of ESMA's recommendation to the Commission to remove the legal limitations to the exchange of information between these authorities1a; shares ESMA's concern that withholding tax reclaim schemes are rarely confined to EU borders1b and therefore stresses the importance of continued international cooperation on this matter; _________________ 1aEuropean Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), MAR Review Report, [ESMA70-156-2391], 23 September 2020, paragraph 624 1bEuropean Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), MAR Review Report, [ESMA70-156-2391], 23 September 2020, paragraph 617
Amendment 143 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. NotStrongly welcomes the Commission’s intention to put forward a proposal by the end of 2022 establishing a European withholding tax framework for dividend, interest or royalty payments, accompanied by a mechanism for the exchange of information and cooperation among tax administrations;
Amendment 151 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Encourages the development of a harmonised EU procedure for withholding tax refunds for all Member States, thereby addressing the concerns about regulatory discrepancies; calls on the Commission to consider, as part of this harmonisation, inter alia, the introduction of a standardised format and process for reclaim requests, the lack of a uniform definition of "beneficial owner", the alignment of the time periods for request and reclaim, and language barriers;
Amendment 161 #
2021/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that digitalising these procedures and improving cooperation between national tax administrations could reduce the administrative burden and uncertainty in cross-border investments in the short-term; in the mid- to long-term, calls the Commission to consider the possibility of developing and introducing a fully integrated, centralised and automated system to allow a seamless, and fraud-proof system for relief at source; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to take account of existing digital solutions in Member States and the potential benefits of using distributed ledger technology (DLT) as the foundations of such a system, and to consider the establishment of a pilot project;
Amendment 12 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Believes that the deployment of semi-public and private smart charging infrastructure remains a core pre- condition to boost market uptake of e- vehicles;
Amendment 30 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes that Member States should retain the option to define the parameters for setting up Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB) and be able to continue with an individual approach to their technical implementation
Amendment 32 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 42 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses the need to maintain the NZEB requirements for new buildings. Believes, however, that a more balanced approach would be needed when referring to renovation works.
Amendment 44 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Supports the gradual introduction of minimum requirements for the energy standards of buildings in the Member States,particularly in terms of financial and non-financial incentives for individual owners and segments.
Amendment 50 #
2021/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Points out that several local authorities have started adopting decarbonisation plans that include also setting binding dates to ban the use of internal combustion engines vehicles; calls on these authorities to ensure that their plans include dedicated financial and technical support to adapt their building stock in order to meet their decarbonisation plans;
Amendment 72 #
2021/2074(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that Member States are free to decide on their own economic policies and in particular their own tax policies; emphasises that it logically follows that decisions in the Council regarding tax matters require unanimity; recalls, however, that Member States must exercise this competence consistently with Union law;
Amendment 92 #
2021/2074(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that tax base harmonisation such as the common corporate tax base or the ‘Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation’ could reduce the cost of tax compliance for SMEs that operate in more than one Member State; stresses that its proposed introduction must not lead to direct or indirect taxation of companies by the EU;
Amendment 9 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 5 June 2020 on “EU Waterborne Transport Sector – Future outlook: Towards a carbon-neutral, zero accidents, automated and competitive EU Waterborne Transport Sector”1b, _________________ 1b Document 7976/20
Amendment 13 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 15 November 2018 on Inland Waterway Transport – “See its potential and promote it!,”1a _________________ 1a Document 15144/18
Amendment 16 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas European countries have a variety of different fleets of inland vessels, which makes inland waterway transport very convenient and useful for transporting different types and large quantities of cargo to different destinations on either large or small rivers, canals and lakes;
Amendment 24 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, the total share of cross- border freight by our inland waterways is 54% on the Rhine-Alpine corridor, 35% on the North Sea-Mediterranean corridor and even 38% on the North Sea-Baltic corridor and whereas it is important to advance the completion of the TEN-T inland waterways core network as well the connection to the comprehensive network;
Amendment 29 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the modal shift objectives of the 2011 White Paper on transport1c have not been reached; _________________ 1c28.03.2011 White Paper Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
Amendment 35 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas drought and climate change are among the major problems for European inland waterway transport. In several European regions, inland waterway transport was hard hit by the long drought period in 2018 with extremely low water levels; whereas the consequences were devastating for the Rhine and its tributaries, the Upper and Middle Danube and the Upper and Middle Elbe; whereas in Germany, this led to a decline of EUR 5 billion in industrial production; whereas furthermore, in Northern Europe, the inland water areas are frozen during the most severe winter months and the traffic season has to be stopped;
Amendment 38 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the modal shift from road to inland waterways not only concerns freight but also passenger transport - notably in urban areas. As 50% of the EU population lives close to the sea and along rivers, inland waterway passenger transport offers an environmentally friendly alternative in terms of both energy consumption and noise emissions. It also contributes to decongesting overloaded road networks and provides an alternative for road infrastructure expansion in densely populated areas;
Amendment 41 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas river cruises, ferries, water taxis and water shuttles should become a cleaner option for tourism and public transport in regions and cities with accessible and navigable rivers and canal, canals and lakes, which would make urban mobility more sustainable and effective;
Amendment 46 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas inland waterway transport could play an important role for maritime transport in terms of digitalisation development and creating scale regarding zero-emission propulsion solutions (e.g. electrification as well as hydrogen);
Amendment 49 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the procedures to obtain a certificate for a hydrogen vessel are still very lengthy. In addition, for a series of hydrogen vessels (with exactly the same technical characteristics), applications have to be submitted for every single vessel separately. This kind of administrative burden discourages private investments and therefore slows down the technological progress and thus the improvement of cost-efficiency;
Amendment 50 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas the role of contractors in the entire supply chain is important to take into account in order to improve the business case for sustainable investments in the inland waterway transport sector;
Amendment 59 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the Commission’s intention in the Strategy for Sustainable and Smart Mobility to shift more goods from road to inland waterways and short sea shipping; stresses however the high untapped potential and manoeuvre for inland waterway transport to grow; therefore calls on the Commission to show more ambition by putting the modal shift goals for inland waterway transport on the same level as rail (i.e. a raise of 50% by 2030 and a twofold increase by 2050);
Amendment 62 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that regional and (inter-) urban freight transport and logistics by inland waterways should be encouraged in countries and regions where this could become a valuable alternative in order to accomplish the much needed modal shift; in this regard, stresses that investments are needed in more flexible and innovative ship designs and in the greening of the existing inland waterway transport fleet in order to become a serious competitive alternative to road transport;
Amendment 67 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that more investment in updating river and canalphysical and digital waterway infrastructure (for example, locks, bridges and interoperable deployment of digital technologies across borders) is key in order to maintain the reliability of inland waterway transport and boost the competitiveness of the sector, while respecting the applicable environmental law;
Amendment 82 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that there is not a ‘one size fits all’ solution for tackling the problem of low water levels as a result ofwhich could worsen due to climate change effects; deplores, however, that the problems of the inland waterway sector, caused by the low water levels, have not been taken duly into account while solutions are available; therefore stresses that coherent action needs to be taken, such as fleet adaptation (type of ships, quantity of fleet, spare capacity), optimisation of ship design, taking into account the inland waterway vessel’s versatility, better infrastructure management and development, improved water level information and forecasting as well as cooperation with rail during low water periods, time-charter contracts for vessels which are able to operate during low water tide periods, implementation of digital tools and increasing storage capacity in ports;
Amendment 89 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission, Member States' public authorities and stakeholders to cooperate, in order to take the necessary measures to ensure a climate resilient, future proof, year-around and flexible inland waterway infrastructure taking into account aspects and possibilities of multimodality; considers that national and international authorities managing inland waterways should be fully mobilised in the adoption and implementation of any measure aimed to tackle extreme climate conditions in order to enable year round navigation;
Amendment 102 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the importance of further encouraging and supporting initiatives aimed at the use of alternative fuels and propulsion methods for shipping in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality; points out, in this regard, the value of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a transitional solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants in inland waterway transport; notes that the existing, technically mature vessels and distribution infrastructure now based on LNG could be used for biogas and will therefore be essential in scaling up Bio-LNG as a marine fuel;
Amendment 113 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that low-emission and zero-emission alternatives should become more financially attractive than conventional propulsions and that this trend should be accelerated, for example by a realistic, progressively increasing blending percentage based on an impact assessment; considers furthermore that Member States should have the opportunity to set a decreasing or zero tax rate for the use of shore-side electricity and zero-emission fuels;
Amendment 115 #
2021/2015(INI)
5a. Stresses that a European emission labelling scheme for IWT that ensures availability of information on the energy performance of ships, promotes energy efficiency and creates a stable environment for investment decisions, should be assessed; highlights that this scheme must aim to effectively reduce emissions and assist the sector by providing improved access to funding, loans and guarantees based on its emission performance, improve emission monitoring, create benefits by incentivising port authorities to differentiate port infrastructure charges, ultimately raising the sector's attractiveness as a whole;
Amendment 119 #
2021/2015(INI)
6a. Believes that in view of our climate goals, the shipping sector is able to offer more sustainable and future-proof transport; stresses that public authorities should play a connecting and coordinating role in this development phase and engage with all interested stakeholders, including users of inland waterways and the shipbuilding industry; therefore stresses that support for innovation, a European financing plan, the facilitation of certification and permission to sail on alternative fuels are therefore strongly needed;
Amendment 124 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Highlights that greening the fleet should focus on reducing other sources of pollution as well, as the pollution of rivers is not limited to CO2 emissions only; therefore, highlights the importance of providing waste discharge facilities in ports as well as promoting the use of innovative anti-fouling paint and advanced hull maintenance technology (e.g. underwater drones);
Amendment 128 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls on the Commission to provide a practical guide and toolbox on the possibilities of sustainable fuel options and technologies for inland waterway and short sea ships in order to support ship- owners in their decision-making; highlights that it should focus on inland waterway and short sea ship types given their similar technical characteristics;
Amendment 130 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that far-reaching digitalisation and data collection contributes to a cleaner environment and improved safety on board and result in more efficient routing and better communication and information exchange between ships, ports and infrastructure; stressespoints out that digitalisation could bring significant benefits for the collection and analysis of data related to the inland waterway transport sector, for the safety and for energy efficiency reasons, contributing to further emission reduction; stresses in this regard the need to further harmonise River Information Services (RIS), which wouldaiming to solve the problems arising from different interpretations of technical standards and the lack of comparable data, and underlines the need to prepare for interoperable data exchange with other modes of transport;
Amendment 135 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to ensure a harmonised digital use and acceptance of electronic crew and vessel documents throughout the EU as soon as possible, which ensures improvement of the efficiency and attractiveness of inland waterway transport and its smooth interaction and integration with other transport modes and increases interoperability of data exchange systems in the context of the entire logistics chain;
Amendment 138 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the importance of using space data and services for inland waterway transport services, leading to a safer, more sustainable, efficient and competitive sector; considers that in particular new Galileo, EGNOS and Copernicus services should be included in the review of the ITS Directive and other smart mobility legislative initiatives;
Amendment 139 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Stresses the importance of collecting data on the European logistics system in coordination with relevant stakeholders in preparation for the Combined Transport Directive proposal and other measures leading to more efficient logistics planning and use of physical infrastructure; moreover, calls on the Commission to come up with an intermodal overview on the flow of goods and containers entering Europe as well as the routes the goods follow to their end destination as this could help when drawing up effective modal shift policy;
Amendment 147 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that increased automation brings the reality of synchromodal transport in Europe closer; insists therefore on the need for a European Roadmap for Smart and Autonomous Inland Waterway Transport Systems that supports research, the development and successful implementation of smart ships and ports, and digital interoperability; calls on the Commission, based on an impact assessment and a broad consultation with all relevant stakeholders, to consider the necessary revisions of all related legislation in order to facilitate the uptake of autonomous shipping, particularly concerning the responsibilities of crew in emergencies or system failure, clarification of liability issues in case of damages, and more in general on the safety aspects of autonomous vessels, in order to achieve a certain level of harmonisation at EU level1d; stresses that this would help to ensure the safety of autonomous vessels and thereby increase the uptake of the technology across Europe; insists therefore on the need for a European Roadmap for Smart and Autonomous Inland Waterway Transport Systems that supports research, the development and successful implementation of autonomous ships, smart ports, and digital interoperability, as well as ensures the deployment of remote vessel control and remote lock management; in this regard, stresses the need for smart infrastructure as well as the necessary training, up- skilling and re-skilling of crew, which could be supported under the social investments and skills window in the InvestEU programme; _________________ 1dEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) 2021 Report ‘Waterborne transport in Europe - the role of Research and Innovation in decarbonisation - An analysis of waterborne transport, based on the Transport Research and Innovation Monitoring and Information System(TRIMIS)’, p. 53. Furthermore, preliminary results from the Horizon 2020 EGNSS Hull-to-Hull (H2H) project show that the EU navigation systems EGNOS, Copernicus and Galileo contribute to improving navigation decisions and conditions for autonomous vessels: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/775998 /results.
Amendment 154 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Boosting the modal shift should be considered as a priority as sea containers are currently not always efficiently transported from a seaport to the hinterland leading to higher costs and longer travel times; calls on the Commission to conduct research and promote the use of algorithms and artificial intelligence in container hinterland transport for an optimal planning and processing of containers;
Amendment 165 #
2021/2015(INI)
10. Stresses the role of inland ports as strategic, multimodal nodes in the logistics system; stresses, therefore, that inland ports as well as sea ports should have efficient connections, including rail infrastructure, with a focus on connecting to the TEN-T core and comprehensive corridornetworks where possible;
Amendment 168 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Highlights that close cooperation between the different inland ports (e.g. on sustainability), creates further possibilities for cost and operational efficiency improvements and has a positive effect on regional development and employment; considers that projects of a cluster of ports should be given priority with regards to funding;
Amendment 172 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights that the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure should take into account the potential demand and market characteristics of a port; stresses, therefore, that a European rollout strategy of alternative fuels for multimodal use through the TEN-T revision and Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (AFID) should follow a network approach that leads to an efficiently planned infrastructure, based on the potential market demand characteristics of a port and, where necessary, along water routes; moreover stresses the potential of a flexible infrastructure system, e.g. including mobile generators;
Amendment 178 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to promote the concept of Life Cycle Assessment with the goal to start a dialogue and to encourage inland ports to design integrated management systems for water, energy, waste, construction sites, spatial planning and urban green areas;
Amendment 195 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the need to encourage the project development of innovative inland waterway vessels and the corresponding port infrastructure under the Horizon Europe Partnership on zero-emission waterborne transport;
Amendment 196 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importanceHighlights the possibility of existing EU funding instruments for greening and digitalising our European inland waterway transport sector, such as the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), Horizon Europe and the Structural and Cohesion Funds, and the need to mobilise them to finance investments in alternative fuels and adequate ships and infrastructurthe development and roll-out of alternative propulsion systems for vessels and the necessary infrastructure; stresses, however, that these funding instruments are not suitable for SMEs, family businesses and other micro-sized enterprises, carrying the risk that these smaller projects are not eligible;
Amendment 204 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Highlights that the path towards a zero-emission inland waterway sector and the needed energy transition will create a funding gap approaching EUR 10 billion1e, which cannot be financed by the sector alone; moreover, highlights the absence of a business case for private vessel owners to invest in zero-emission propulsion technologies; therefore, stresses the need to mobilise public support and private investments; _________________ 1e DST, “Assessment of technologies in view of zero-emission IWT“, Edition 1, part of the overarching CCNR study “Financing the energy transition towards a zero-emission European IWT sector“, Report No. 2293, p. 95 https://www.ccr- zkr.org/files/documents/EtudesTransEner /Deliverable_RQ_C_Edition_1_Oct2020.p df
Amendment 210 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that the inland waterway sector consists mostly of SMEs, family businesses and smaller ports, which makes it difficult for them to make expensive investments in order to comply with the goals of the Green Deal; considers, therefore, that the administrative burden and cost for access to funding should be significantly reducshould be significantly reduced and access to funding improved;
Amendment 216 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. CTherefore, calls on the Commission to set up a dedicated European inland waterway fund, including a one-stop-shop system that is easily accessible for help and assistance and has the possibility to combine projects into a single application, thus increasing the chances for funding; stresses that the fund should be financed through the reserve funds created under Regulation (EU) 546/20149 , where possible complemented with national funds and contributions, and should provide for the possibility of blending with the CEF and the Structural and Cohesion Funds and national funds where possible; _________________ 9 OJ L 163, 29.5.2014, p. 15.
Amendment 217 #
2021/2015(INI)
16a. Stresses that the Fund should focus on ship retrofitting and renewal aiming to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investments in innovative and energy saving technologies as well as port infrastructure, notably the deployment of alternative fuels, contributing to the objectives of the Green Deal, a green recovery and a more sustainable transport system as a whole;
Amendment 222 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls that the European Investment Bank (EIB) provides funding for attractive capital loans, including the shipbuilding industry; considers, however, that the realisation and the effectiveness of EIB funding depends on its accessibility; therefore, insists on: a) ensuring that the Green Shipping Guarantee Programme of the EIB should also be applicable to smaller transactions including more flexible loan conditions, e.g. taking into account the average ship’s service operational life in the payback period; b) ensuring that the EIB provides both pre-delivery financing and post-delivery financing for shipbuilders, in order to guarantee the implementation and the viability of innovative shipbuilding projects; c) funding of research and innovation programmes for green shipbuilding becoming a priority;
Amendment 229 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Highlights the untapped potential of inland waterways in urban areas as confirmed in the Strategy for Sustainable and Smart Mobility; stresses that urban areas become more and more congested and building new road infrastructure is not always cost efficient; calls on the Commission to come up with concrete proposals aiming to increase logistics over our inland waterways - boosting the modal shift;
Amendment 233 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Highlights that 2019 figures for passenger transport demand revealed that the European river cruise sector, including day-trip vessels and ferry services, was in a healthy state before the COVID-19 pandemic and came to an almost complete standstill in the first half of 2020 due to the current health situation resulting in a negative economic impact and financial difficulties for companies, and it remains uncertain whether passenger traffic will return to normal in 20211f; therefore calls on the Commission to include inland waterway tourism in its upcoming European Agenda of Tourism 2050 in order to facilitate a business case for a sustainable, innovative and resilient recovery of river tourism, taking into account the economic impacts of river tourism on port regions in terms of added value, employment creation and port revenues; _________________ 1f https://inland-navigation- market.org/chapitre/8-outlook/?lang=en
Amendment 235 #
2021/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Calls on the Member States to accept the international Certificate for the Operation of a Pleasure Craft by adopting Resolution 40 of the UNECE Inland Transport Committee, in order to allow the cross-border recognition of licences and to facilitate recreational navigation within Europe;
Amendment 8 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is being confronted with new trends and challenges in automation that could have a huge impact on road safety; whereas the growing phenomenon of distraction by mobile devices needs to be addressed; whereas some technological advances, connectivity and automation, create new road safety opportunities to reduce or compensate for human errors; whereas in the near future, the presence of both vehicles with a wide range of automated/connected features and traditional vehicles in mixed traffic will pose a new riskchallenges, especially for vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians;
Amendment 10 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas automation as well as the sharing economy provide new opportunities to tackle congestion especially in urban areas; whereas developing the synergies between safety and sustainability measures in urban areas, could lead to less CO2 emissions, improved air quality, reduced congestion;
Amendment 13 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the share of road deaths of vulnerable road users is increasing, as car users have been the main beneficiaries of improved vehicle safety and other road safety measures; whereas the safety of motorbike riders, cyclists and pedestrians must be urgently addressed;
Amendment 23 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas achieving the new EU road safety targets requires more intensive and cooperative efforts to develop strong European road safety policies with stakeholders, research and innovation support, in order to prepare policy based solutions based on solid data and impact analysis, increased and targeted enforcement measures at national level and effective cooperation on cross- border enforcement of penalties;
Amendment 32 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the EU has reaffirmed in the 2021-2030 EU road safety policy framework its long-term visionstrategic goal to get close to zero deaths and zero serious injuries on European roads by 2050, known as Vision Zero, and its medium- term goal to reduce deaths and serious injuries by 50 % by 2030; highlights that these EU goals and targets relating to road safety should be underpinned by a coordinated, well- planned, systematic and well-financed road safety approach at EU, national, regional and local level;
Amendment 34 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes in this regard the adoption of the safe system approach at EU level, based on a performance framework and timed targets for the reduction of casualties and serious injuries; welcomes the setting up of key performance indicators (KPIs) established in cooperation with Member States to enable a more focused and targeted analysis of the Member States’ performances and to identify shortcomings; recalls onthat the Commission to set outcome targets by 2023unication “Europe on the Move – Sustainable Mobility for Europe: safe, connected and clean” in 2018 confirmed the EU's long-term goal of moving to zero fatalities in road transport by 2050 and added that the same should be achieved for serious injuries; highlights that the same communication proposed new interim targets of reducing the number of road deaths by 50% between 2020 and 2030 as well as reducing the number of serious injuries by 50% in the same period, as recommended in the Valletta Declaration; underlines the importance of the ongoing cooperation between the EU and the Members States in this regard and urges all Members States to fully commit to this exercise and agree on a harmonised methodology for KPIs that will allow Member States to be comparedcompare data; stresses the importance of promoting best national practices, in order to improve harmonisation and to bring together the existing different national approaches to road safety;
Amendment 39 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Commission to extend the programme “EU Road Safety Exchange” aiming at improving the road safety performance, currently focusing on six Member States to all EU Member States;
Amendment 41 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to further promote the EU funding opportunities through regional and cohesion funds, the Connecting Europe Facility and the “Safer Transport Platform” launched by the European Investment Bank (EIB); stresses the importance of funding and making the eligibility criteria clearer for road safety actions also through future EU instruments, such as Invest EU and CEF2 Regulation; aiming at accelerating the delivery of road safety results; furthermore, calls on all Member States to earmark an adequate part of their national budget, which, coupled with EU funds, should make it possible to implement their national road safety programmes and the new 2021-2030 EU Road Safety Policy Framework;
Amendment 49 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to prioritise investments with the greatest benefit in terms of road safety, including investments in maintaining existing infrastructure and in the construction of new infrastructure; welcomes, in this regard, the launch of the Safer Transport Platform initiative and calls on all interested parties to considerthe Commission and the EIB to consider launching awareness-raising and information campaigns in order to ensure that all interested parties are well informed about the conditions of its use;
Amendment 55 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that a proactive assessment of the EU road network will be a useful tool to assess the in-built safety of roads and to target investment; welcomes, in this regard, the risk mapping and safety rating of motorways and primary roads introduced in the recently revised EU infrastructure safety rules4 and calls on the Member States to designate as many primary roads in their territory as possible to increase the road safety potential of the new directive; calls on the Commission and the Member States to agree as soon as possible on a methodology to carry out systematic network-wide road assessments as mandated in the revision of the above- mentioned act; highlights the importance of using infrastructure to introduce self- explaining, self-enforcing roads, specifically in dangerous zones, or zones with a prevalence of vulnerable road users for the safety of all participants in road traffic; recalls the importance of the performance of road signs and markings, including their placing, visibility and retro-reflectivity, especially for the good functioning of driver assistance systems, such as Intelligent Speed Assistance and Lane Keeping Assistance; calls on the Commission and the Member States to speed up the work on the specifications at EU level for the performance of road signs and markings in order to prepare the way for a higher level of automation in vehicles; reminds that according to the Commission’s impact assessment, these new rules have the potential to save up to 3200 lives and avoid 20 700 serious injuries by 2030; _________________ 4Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 amending Directive 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management, OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1.
Amendment 63 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission to continue working closely with the Member States to define a KPI for road infrastructure, indicating the safety quality of a road network independent of road user behaviour or vehicle technology, based on agreed common rating methodology;
Amendment 79 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the recent revision of the General Safety Regulation, which will make new advanced safety features in vehicles such as intelligent speed assistance and emergency lane keeping systems mandatory in the EU as from 2022, with the potential to save around 7 300 lives and avoid 38 900 serious injuries by 2030; calls on the Commission to adopt ambitious and timely secondary legislation, to evaluate future developments and to review the regulation where appropriate in order to keep pace with technical developments; in this regards, recalls the importance of innovation in vehicle technology, which can both help mitigate the severity of crashes and reduce the likelihood of crashes through active and passive safety features;
Amendment 92 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission, in line with the TRAN implementation report on the road safety aspects of the Roadworthiness Package, to take due account of the technical progress in vehicle safety features provided for in new General Safety Regulation and to include advanced safety systems in the scope of the next revision of the Roadworthiness Package to ensure they are checked during periodical technical inspections; in this regard, calls on the competent authorities to ensure additional trainings, upskilling and re-skilling of the related inspectors conducting the PTIs.
Amendment 96 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to propose a new harmonised regulatory framework for automated cars in order to ensure, by means of comprehensive tests, including real driving conditions, that automated cars will operate in an absolutely safe manner for their drivers and other road users, in particular concerning their interaction with conventional vehicles and vulnerable road users; in this regard, highlights the importance of ensuring training and qualification to be brought up to date and equip drivers with the necessary skills and knowledge to drive automated vehicles as they emerge onto the market in the coming years;
Amendment 114 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that safe road use ( speed, driving without alcohol and drugs, undistracted driving, safety belt and child restraint use, helmet use) is the third pillar for the prevention and mitigation of fatalities and serious injuries in collisions, showing that the human factor in road safety plays a crucial role; notes that according to a Commission study, alcohol is estimated to be involved in around 25 % of all road fatalities, while drugs are involved in 15 % of road fatalities5 ; notes that the EU recommendation on permitted blood alcohol content dates from 2001; calls the Commission to include a zero- tolerance drink-driving limit in its recommendations, and to introduce an EU recommendation for zero tolerance regarding illicit psychoactive drugs and standards on roadside drug-driving enforcement; calls on the Commission to also include in the revised recommendations guidance on the fitting of alcohol interlock devices, with a special focus on repeat offenders, high- level first- time offenders and all professional drivers; in this regards, calls on the Commission to consider the feasibility and the added value of elaborating a harmonised system of mutual recognition of driving disqualifications and of penalty points between Member States, where it exists. _________________ 5Commission study of 18 February 2014 on the prevention of drink-driving by the use of alcohol interlock devices.
Amendment 121 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that speeding is a key factor in around 30 % of fatal road crashes and an aggravating factor in most crashes; calls on the Commission to come up with a recommendation to apply safe speed limits in line with the safe system approach for all road types, such as maximum speeds of 30km/h in residential areas and areas where there are high numbers of cyclists and pedestrians, or where there could be potential to increase cycling and walking levels, and to assess the feasibility of limiting the maximum top speed of all new vehicles as an effective way of reducing road casualties, as well as air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions;
Amendment 134 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls that the Driving Licence Directive established a harmonised EU licence model and introduced minimum requirements for obtaining licences; notes that the directive will need to be kept up- to-date regarding new technological developments in vehicle and infrastructure technology and vehicle automation; calls on the Commission to consider introducing a graduated licencing system that encourages novice drivers to gain more experience while limiting certain high-risk activities such as driving at night and with passengers; note, while taking into account the mobility needs of people living in areas with cloncern that cases of irregular issuing of driving licences have been reported in several Member States and calls on the Commission to monitor this issueg distances and limited access to public transport; notes that driver licencing, targeted education and awareness raising, supported by strong and sustained compliance and enforcement regimes, have an important role to play in giving road users the capability and willingness to use roads and vehicles safely;
Amendment 146 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the expansion of the home delivery sector and specifically the use of vans, powered two-wheelers and bicycles; calls on the Commission to consider introducing a requirement for van drivers to undergo professional driver training and proposing a regulation on working hours and rest periods for van driver, boosting the emergence of new types of platform work and business models; calls on the Commission to assess the introduction of a recommendation on the safety of delivery personnel, including requirements for employers and companies to ensure the provision and use of safety equipment and safe vehicles;
Amendment 160 #
2021/2014(INI)
16. Highlights the importance of fast and effective post-crash care in significantly reducing the consequences of injury; calls on the Member States, in this context, to establish closer collaboration between their road safety authorities and the health sector, to make it mandatory to build emergency lanes and to enforce their correct use to speed up rescue operations; calls onfurther the Commission to considerand the Member States to provide for sufficient financing for efficient emergency infrastructure, including air medical services; calls on the Commission to makinge first aid training compulsory in the future revision of the Driving Licence Directive; recalls the importance of effective follow- up victim support;
Amendment 169 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that poor enforcement of road traffic rules undermines efforts to achieve Vision Zero; encourages the Member States to set annual targets for enforcement and compliance in their road safety plans and to ensure their adequate funding; underlines that only well- explained and, well-publicised consistent enforcement activities and education by enforcement can have a long- lasting effect on driving behaviour;
Amendment 186 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Underlines that the manipulation and fraud in electronic safety features, such as advanced driving assistance systems, represent a high safety risk and need therefore to be addressed by specific training on the control of software integrity provided to inspectors;
Amendment 191 #
2021/2014(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission, in view of the upcoming revision of the Urban Mobility Package, to promote synergies between safety and sustainability measures in urban areas; calls, in this regard, for the reprioritisation of transport infrastructure in dense urban areas away from individual motorised transport towards public transport and sustainable, safer and healthier transport modes such as walking and cyclingsustainable, safer and healthier transport modes such as public transport, walking and cycling, taking into consideration the special needs of vulnerable road users, such as children, persons with disabilities and elderly persons; encourages further investments and co-funding by EU funding instruments for parking and other mobility connectivity zones in the entry of urban areas, providing for easy access to different modes of public transport, in view of reducing urban congestion and CO2 emissions;
Amendment 5 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
— having regard the conclusions of the European Council of 21 July 2020,
Amendment 65 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the shortcomings of the international tax system, which is unfit for properly addressing the challenges of globalisation and digitalisation; calls for an international agreement aiming for a fair and effective tax system; stresses that the European Union and its Member States should take the lead in responding to those shortcomings;
Amendment 85 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that on average digital business models face significantly lower effective tax rates than traditional business models which rely on physical presence; regrets that tax avoidance linked to aggressive tax planning is not only detrimental to the collection of public revenues but also puts businesses, especially SMEs, at a disadvantage, while creating barriers for new local entrants; highlights the need to consider potential SME entry-barriers when proposing regulation in the digital area in order to avoid creating a sector with only a few big actors;
Amendment 97 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the efforts in the G20/OECD IF to reach a global consensus on a multilateral reform of the international tax system to address the challenges of the digitalised economy; regrets, however, the missed deadline fixed on the end of the year 2020 to reach an agreement; acknowledges the progress of discussions on the proposals at technical level, despite the delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and calls for a swift agreement by mid-2021; highlights the value of the G20/OECD IF for guaranteeing multilateral solutions and finding support at the global and EU level;
Amendment 202 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. RegretNotes that the Council did not agree on any of the Commission’s related proposals, i.e. the digital services tax, the significant digital presence or the CCTB and CCCTB; recalls on the Member States to reconsider their position on these proposals, and to consider all options provided for by the Treaties if no unanimous agreement can be reachedimportance of reaching an agreement at OECD-level in order to avoid potential trade wars; highlights that taxation is a member state competence;
Amendment 214 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 217 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for a stronger role for Parliament in legislative procedures in the area of taxation; takes note of the Commission’s proposed roadmap to qualified majority voting in its communication entitled ‘Toward a more efficient and democratic decision-making in EU tax policy’Recalls that taxation is a member state competence;
Amendment 230 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 93 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The effectiveness and fairness of the global minimum tax reform heavily relies on its worldwide implementationswift and consistent implementation worldwide and by EU Member States by the end of 2023. It will thus be vital that all major trading partners of the Union apply either a qualified IIR or an equivalent set of rules on minimum taxation. In this context, and in support of legal certainty and efficiency of the global minimum tax rules, it is important to further delineate the conditions under which the rules implemented in a third country jurisdiction which will not transpose the rules of the global agreement can be granted equivalence to a qualified IIR. To this end, this Directive should provide for an assessment, by the Commission, of the equivalence criteria based on certain parameters together with a listing of third country jurisdictions that meet the equivalence criteria. This list would be modified, through a delegated act, following any subsequent assessment of the legal framework implemented by a third country jurisdiction in its domestic law. The implementation of the Pillar II Directive will require an increased exchange of information between Member States and third country jurisdictions. To this end, the Directive on administrative cooperation(DAC) should be reviewed in accordance with the future OECD work on a competent authority agreement to be developed by the end of 2022.
Amendment 204 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Amendment 253 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 20223.
Amendment 258 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 3
Article 55 – paragraph 3
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 20234.
Amendment 261 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 4
Article 55 – paragraph 4
However, they shall apply the provisions necessary to comply with Articles 11, 12 and 13 from 1 January 20245.
Amendment 34 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Measures to improve further the energy performance of buildings should take into account climatic conditions, including adaptation to climate change, local conditions as well as indoor climate environment and cost-effectiveness. Those measures should not affect other requirements concerning buildings such as accessibility , fire safety, acoustic safety and seismic safety and the intended use of the building.
Amendment 38 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19 a) The concept of ‘technical feasibility’ has not yet been defined in Union legislation. With a view to achieving the long-term vision for buildings, parameters of technical feasibility should be defined.
Amendment 40 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20 a (new)
Recital 20 a (new)
(20 a) Emphasises the importance of a market-driven transition in the electrification of transport and the need for this Directive to create a cost-effective framework that does not lead to unreasonable cost increases for citizens. Underlines that energy efficiency measures for buildings should take into account different national and local characteristics, such as sparsely populated areas and already implemented improvements for energy efficiency in Member States.
Amendment 47 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) Member States should support energy performance upgrades of existing buildings that contribute to achieving a healthy indoor environment, including through the removal of asbestos, following acoustic safety and other harmful substances, preventing the illegal removal of harmful substances, and facilitating compliance with existing legislative acts such as Directives 2009/148/EU37 and (EU) 2016/228438 of the European Parliament and of the Council. _________________ 37 Directive 2009/148/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work (OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 28). 38 Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC (OJ L 344, 17.12.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 53 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) Combined with an increased share of renewable electricity production, electric vehicles produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions. Electric vehicles constitute an important component of a clean energy transition based on energy efficiency measures, alternative fuels, renewable energy and innovative solutions for the management of energy flexibility. Building codes can be effectively used to introduce targeted requirements to support the deployment of recharging infrastructure in car parks of residential and non-residential buildings as well as in truck depots and logistic hubs. Member States should remove barriers such as split incentives and administrative complications which individual owners encounter when trying to install a recharging point on their parking space.
Amendment 81 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
13. ‘energy from renewable sources’ means energy from renewable non-fossil sources, namely wind, solar (solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) , and geothermal energy , ambient energy, tide, wave and other ocean energy, hydropower, biomass, landfill gas, sewage treatment plant gas,energy recovered from waste incineration plants, non-avoidable waste heat from e.g. industrial processes, PtX and datacenters, sewage treatment plant gas, renewable fuels (biofuels, bioliquids, biomass fuels and renewable fuels of non- biological origin) and biogas;
Amendment 88 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 a (new)
57 a. 'pre-cabling' means all measures that are necessary to enable the installation of recharging points at a later date, including cable routes, space for transformers and electricity meters, i.e. both the technical cabling (cable path, technical sheaths, drilling) and the electrical pre-equipment in collective electrical installations (switchboard, horizontal electrical column, bus cable), as well as grid capacities.
Amendment 89 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 b (new)
57 b. “Logistic hubs” is a center in a defined area within which all activities relating to transport, logistics and the distribution of goods - both for national and international transit, are carried out by various operators on a commercial basis. The operators can either be owners or tenants of buildings and facilities (warehouses, distribution centres, storage areas,offices, truck services, etc.), which have been built here.
Amendment 90 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 c (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 c (new)
57 c. “Truck depot” means any building, or land, in or on which a business, service or industry involving the maintenance, servicing, storage or repair of commercial vehicles and/or transport trailers is undertaken or performed.
Amendment 91 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 d (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 d (new)
57 d. If multiple charging points using the same distribution grid connection without sufficient overall grid capacity are being installed in one building, a mandatory installation of a dynamic load management system behind the meter of that building should be implemented. Such a requirement avoids an extensive enhancement of the grid connection and reduces overall installation costs.
Amendment 107 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) after 1 January 202730, at least energy performance class F; and
Amendment 108 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) after 1 January 20303, at least energy performance class E;
Amendment 109 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) after 1 January 202730, at least energy performance class F; and
Amendment 110 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) after 1 January 20303, at least energy performance class E;
Amendment 111 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) residential apartment buildings and building units achieve at the latest
Amendment 112 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) after 1 January 20303, at least energy performance class F; and
Amendment 113 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) after 1 January 20336, at least energy performance class E;
Amendment 115 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
Amendment 122 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With regard to new non-residential buildings and non-residential buildings undergoing major renovation, with more than fiveirrespective the number of parking spaces, Member States shall ensure by end 2025:
Amendment 127 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the installation of recharging points serving at least one recharging point; 10% of parking spaces by 2025, at least 20% of parking spaces by 2030, and at least 40% of parking spaces by 2035, whilst ensuring the installation of a minimum of one recharging point by 2025.
Amendment 140 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 145 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall ensure that the pre- cabling is dimensioned so as to enable the simultaneous use of the expected number of recharging points including an installation of a dynamic load management system at a minimum capacity and without any need for smart charging to prevent local power shortage.
Amendment 146 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (a), for new office buildings and office buildings undergoing major renovation, with more than five parking spaces, Member States shall ensure the installation of at least one recharging point for every two parking spaces. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (a), Member States shall ensure that parking in all EU new and existing non-residential undergoing major renovation of the buildings with more than ten parking spaces is pre- equipped for the installation of EV charging points by2030, regardless of other planned renovations.
Amendment 153 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. With regard to all non-residential buildings with more than twentyfive parking spaces, Member States shall ensure the installation of at least onfive recharging point for every ten parking spaces, and at least one bicycle parking space for every car parking space, by 1 January 2027. In case of buildings owned or occupied by public authorities, Member States shall ensure pre-cabling for at least one in twoll parking spaces by 1 January 203327.
Amendment 154 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Member States shall ensure a sufficient amount of recharging points are dedicated to employees working in non- residential buildings that are not characterised as office buildings.
Amendment 155 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) In case of office buildings or buildings owned or occupied by public authorities, Member States shall ensure the installation of a recharging point for at least one in two parking spaces by 1 January 2030.
Amendment 174 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 177 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall ensure that the pre- cabling is dimensioned to enable the simultaneous use of recharging points on all parking spaces, including an installation of a dynamic load management. Where, in the case of major renovation, ensuring two bicycle parking spaces for every dwelling is not feasible, Member States shall ensure as many bicycle parking spaces as appropriate.
Amendment 182 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 6
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that the recharging points referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 are capable of smart charging and, where appropriate, bidirectional charging, and that theyeconomically appropriate and technically feasible, bidirectional charging. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 concerning the use of non-proprietary and non-discriminatory communication protocols and standards. The Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council, by 31 December 2025, an in-depth evaluation of available open protocols and market maturity in regards to standardisation. Following this evaluation, the Commission shall, if appropriate, adopt by the 30 June 2026 a delegated act specifying suitable protocols and standards to be used to ensure that recharging points are operated based on non-proprietary and non-discriminatory communication protocols and standards, in an interoperable manner, and in compliance with any legal standards and protocols in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 19(6) and Article 19(7) of Regulation (EU) …/… .../...[AFIR].
Amendment 183 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 6
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that the recharging points referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 are capable of smart charging and, where appropriate, and functionally and technically feasible bidirectional charging, and that they are operated based on non-proprietary and non-discriminatory communication protocols and standards, in an interoperable manner, and in compliance with any legal standards and protocols in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 19(6) and Article 19(7) of Regulation (EU) …/… [AFIR].
Amendment 186 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 7
Article 12 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall encouragsure that operators of non-publicly accessible recharging points operate them in accordance with Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) .../….[AFIR], where applicable.
Amendment 192 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Member States shall provide for measures in order to simplify the deployment of recharging pointencourage, simplify, harmonise and accelerate the procedure for the installation of recharging points via accredited installers in new and existing residential and non-residential buildings and remove regulatory barriers, including permitting and approval procedures from public authorities or grid operators, without prejudice to the property and tenancy law of the Member States. Member States shall remove barriers to the installation of recharging points in residential buildings with parking spaces, in particular the need to obtain consent from the landlord or co-owners for a private recharging point for own use.
Amendment 195 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point 1 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point 1 (new)
Amendment 196 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point 2 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 8 – point 2 (new)
(2) Member States shall provide for the appropriate measures to manage the number of publicly accessible recharging points installed according to the number of requests received within the same areas. The Commission shall publish guidelines by 2025 specifying the standards and protocol to be recommended to national and local public authorities for fire safety in underground and surface car parks. Member States shall streamline existing permitting procedures with the aim of ensuring that electric vehicles’ owners who wish to have a charging point installed at or near their home are able to obtain approval.
Amendment 207 #
2021/0426(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. By 31 December 2025 at the latest, the energy performance certificate shall comply with the template in Annex V. It shall specify the energy performance class of the building, on a closed scale using only letters from A to G. The letter A shall correspond to zero-emission buildings as defined in Article 2, point (2) and the letter G shall correspond to the 15% worst- performing buildings in the national building stock at the time of the introduction of the scale. Mver the buildings which has lower consumption than production. The letter B shall correspond to zero-emission buildings as defined in Article 2, point (2). The remaining letters correspond to NZEB standard multiples in conformity with member Sstates shall ensure that the remaining classes (B to F) have an even bandwidth distribution of energy performance indicators among the energy performance classesmethodology. Letter G covers buildings with no energy efficiency measures implemented so far. Member States shall ensure a common visual identity for energy performance certificates on their territory.
Amendment 300 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions. This should include cases where investment cannot be justified, or where there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas only if they are origin or destination areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks.
Amendment 318 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) The extended and enhanced infrastructure requirements for transport, and rail in particular, require proportionate and sufficient investments, also beyond the multiannual financing framework of 2021-2027. Further generations of Connecting Europe Facility shall address these needs.
Amendment 336 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38 a (new)
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) Because of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and the position adopted by Belarus in that conflict, cooperation between the Union and Russia and Belarus in the field of the TEN-T policy is neither appropriate nor in the interest of the Union. Hence the TEN-T network in those two third countries should be discontinued. As a consequence, improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of the Member States. Connections currently exist between Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland with those two third countries. To reflect the lesser priority in building and upgrading those connections, the last-miles of all cross- border connections with Russia and Belarus currently included in the core network should be downgraded from the core to the comprehensive network for which only a later deadline of implementation of 2050 is provided for. This downgrade should not endanger the eligibility of these connections from the CEF instrument. In case of a democratic transition in Belarus building and upgrading the country’s cross border connections with the EU in line with the comprehensive economic plan for a democratic Belarus would be a high priority, including through re-inclusion of the country back in the Regulation.
Amendment 341 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. Newly constructed high speed lines should be designed for a minimum line speed of 300 km/h. The completion of a high- performance network will also facilitate the development and introduction of new or different models of capacity allocation, for example interval- service timetables enabled by the Timetable Redesign (TTR) initiative.
Amendment 364 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 382 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) While the European Coordinator for ERTMS in close collaboration with national entities should facilitate and promote ERTMS governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment, including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP)planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) should ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding taking into account the advice of the European Union Agency for Railways that remains the system authority for ERTMS development.
Amendment 436 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
Recital 51
(51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the entire functional urban area22 . It should include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. However, increased administrative burden on data collection and reporting should be avoided, for example, in cases where some of the data is already collected and reported under another initiative. __________________ 22 The SUMP concept was first proposed in the 2013 EU Urban mobility package (COM(2013)913 final, Annex I)
Amendment 448 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55 a (new)
Recital 55 a (new)
(55a) Passenger traffic and numbers of passengers on TEN-T corridors will need to increase. Passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services. In order to achieve seamless ticketing, sector-based solutions should be supported and considered as the starting point when improving multimodal ticketing.
Amendment 480 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65 a (new)
Recital 65 a (new)
(65a) Taking into account the considerable costs for the completion of the TEN-T, other sources of co-funding must be available, including among others Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Fund, European Regional Development.
Amendment 481 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65 b (new)
Recital 65 b (new)
(65b) Whereas the Smart and Sustainable Mobility Strategy sets ambitious targets in terms of high speed network [doubling high-speed rail traffic volume by 2030 and tripling it by 2050], the TEN-T Regulation should focus among others on ensuring the rail high- speed connectivity between capitals and major cities of Europe.
Amendment 555 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) 'urban node' means an urban area where elements of the transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, such as ports including passenger terminals, airports, railway stations, bus terminals, logistic platforms and facilities train turnaround terminals and freight terminals, located in and around the urban area, are connected with other elements of that infrastructure and with the infrastructure for regional and local traffic;
Amendment 621 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new)
(an a) ´significant delay´ means projects, operational and technical standards on the core extensive and comprehensive network, which are delayed for, more than 3 years in relation to the implementing deadlines laid down in the Regulation, and in implementing acts provided for therein.
Amendment 637 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by but not limited to further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network across the Union;
Amendment 725 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) be economically viablehave a positive contribution to the development of the network on the basis of a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 737 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission may requirecommend to Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest. The relevant European Coordinator shall have the status of observer in the management or supervisory board or in both of that single entity.
Amendment 755 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) Facilitate railway transport with third countries, such as Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership, Accession countries, EEA countries, Switzerland and countries in Asia.
Amendment 762 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) take into account the physical limitations and topographical particularities of Member States' transport infrastructures, as identified in the technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs).
Amendment 783 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) promoting the efficient and sustainable use of the infrastructure and, where necessary, increasing capacity; ensuring that following the integration of ETCs and RFCs, sufficient capacity for rail passenger and freight is reserved on the corridors.
Amendment 794 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) Constructing new infrastructure, notably to increase capacity for more sustainable modes of transport.
Amendment 810 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully interoperable and at high speed, connecting urban nodes across the Union; and especially at a high speed all capitals and major cities, with the exception of networks that are isolated from the rest of the Union rail system.
Amendment 829 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional including:
Amendment 860 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) proallows, without any additional requirement for special permission to operate servidces a standard of at least P400 in accordance with item 1.1.1.1.3.5 of Table 1 in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/77757, without any additional requirement for special permission to operate service, the conveyance of intermodal loading units in combined transport compatible with the lines codified as at least P400 in accordance with the codification system for combined transport described INF TSI section 2.6, and as referred in parameter 1.1.1.1.3.5 of Table 1 in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/77757. Rail infrastructure managers can choose how to ensure that the TEN-T rail infrastructure lines allow standard operation of P/C 400 trains. __________________ 57 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/777 of 16 May 2019 on the common specifications for the register of railway infrastructure and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/880/EU (OJ L 139I, 27.5.2019, p. 312).
Amendment 875 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis that takes national transport infrastructure planning and especially a European corridor perspective into consideration, as well as and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. __________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44).
Amendment 904 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases where a Member States is affected by specific geographic or significant physical constraints which prevent requirements on prevailing minimum operational line speed pursuant to points (a) and (ba) of this paragraph being complied with on its rail lines on the core network, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting exemptions to those requirements.
Amendment 921 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. To comply with enhanced and new infrastructure requirements, notably with Article 15, paragraph 2 (e), Article 16, paragraph 2 (c), 4 (a) and 4(b), public funding must be sufficient to ensure their timely implementation.
Amendment 939 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ERTMS is equipped;, whilst a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment of tracksides and onboards is ensured.
Amendment 943 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) class B systems are decommissioned unless technically required by the infrastructure managers in exceptional and justified cases while guaranteeing interoperability through ERTMS deployment in line with the timeline.
Amendment 955 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), is equipped with radio-based ERTMS by 31 December 2050.
Amendment 957 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade of the signalling system, radio-based ERTMS is being deployed.
Amendment 974 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6
Article 17 – paragraph 6
6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability, on track capacity as well as the railway sector’s implementation capacity. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. The exemptions granted by the Commission shall take duly consider the deployment progress along the whole Network and shall not endanger the deployment with the deadlines set. The exemptions shall duly consider the necessary operational maintenance. The exemptions shall also reflect the availability of national and European fundings. __________________ 59 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44).
Amendment 983 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF) implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 1001 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers to railway undertakings and terminal operators , technical and operational requirements for infrastructure use and procedures related to border controls doshall not prevent the operational performance of rail freight services along the rail freight lines of the European Transport Corridors from meeting the following target values:
Amendment 1017 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers provided that there is a cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 1029 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) As a long term perspective, subject to socio-economic costs and benefits analysis, developing of infrastructure for train length above 740 m and up to 1500 m and 25.0 t axle load when constructing and modernising railway lines relevant for freight traffic; and should be also backed by European funding.
Amendment 1031 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) developing and deploying innovative technologies for railways, building in particular on the work of the Shift2Rail and Europe’s Rail Joint Undertakings, notably automatic train operation, advanced traffic management, and digital connectivity for passengers based on ERTMS and digital automatic couplings as well as 5G connectivity; the development of Digital Capacity Management in both hardware and software applications should be supported.
Amendment 1041 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen and battery powered trains for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement.
Amendment 1136 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new)
(db) it is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains, military mobility or energy security.
Amendment 1303 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) after assessment and identification of the specific suitability for new technical features, identified and available Terminals are equipped with at least one recharging station as defined in Article 2, point (43), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy- duty vehicles, by 31 December 2030;
Amendment 1352 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node. However, if a terminal has sufficient capacity then it shall be possible for it to serve more than one urban node.
Amendment 1371 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
1. ICT systems for transport shall be such as to enable capacity and traffic management and the exchange of information, where economically and technically feasible, within and between transport modes for multimodal transport operations and value-added transport- related services, improvements in resilience, safety, security, congestion and operational and environmental performance, and simplified administrative procedures. ICT systems for transport shall also facilitate seamless connection between infrastructure and mobile assets.
Amendment 1380 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero- and low-emission vehicles, vessels and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies such as hyperloop;. The implementation of new transport technologies by Member States shall be facilitated in a coordinated and harmonised way with neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable, with a transport corridor perspective.
Amendment 1392 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen, biofuels and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass ICT systems for transport. Transport infrastructure may serve as energy hub to serve different transport modes;
Amendment 1406 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1
Article 45 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements, including by guaranteeing an adequate level of maintenance over the life-time of the transport infrastructure.
Amendment 1437 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) maintenance needs and costs over the life-time of the infrastructure are taken into account infrom feasibility studies and the planning phase of construction or upgrading;
Amendment 1442 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 48 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Compliance with paragraph 1, points (b) and (c) is a precondition for receiving funding from the CEF.
Amendment 1475 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new)
(ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1500 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 2
Article 52 – paragraph 2
2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be formally established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The organization of the "Corridor Forum" shall reflect its new role and tasks. The Member States concerned shall agree on the membership of the Corridor Forum for their part of the European Transport Corridor and ensure representation of the rail freight governance.
Amendment 1518 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work. Representatives of the rail freight governance shall be invited to relevant forum of ETCs.
Amendment 1538 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1576 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data throughat will feed into the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans- European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans-European transport network as well as data on the completion of the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 1597 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The adaptations referred to in points (a) to (c) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the latest available statistics published by Eurostat or, if those statistics are not available, by the national statistics offices of the Member States. The adaptations referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the action plan referred to in Article 35(4). The adaptations referred to in point (e) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the information provided by the Member States concerned in accordance with Article 55(1). Identification of additional railway lines to increase the resilience of the network and with the overarching goal to support logistic chains in the event of disturbances. shall be in line with National Investment Plans. 1. Notwithstanding to the maps set out in Annex I and without prejudice to the provisions in Article 46, Member States may identify additional railway lines, further referred to as diversionary rail routes, with the purpose of increasing the resilience of the network in case of major disruptions or unforeseen capacity constraints to become part of the European Transport Corridors according to Article 50. 2. The identification of a diversionary rail route shall be based on experience with major disruptions in the past, on the impact of these disruptions on the reliability of logistics chains and on traffic forecasts for the European Transport Corridor to which it will contribute. 3. The concerned Member State(s) may notify the need for a diversionary rail route to be included in European Transport Corridor to the responsible European Coordinator according to Article 51 (1).
Amendment 1625 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) No 913/2010
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The cooperation and the consultation between all parties (EBs, MBs, Coordinator, advisory groups) shall address in particular:
Amendment 1629 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) No 913/2010
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) need for targeted investments to upgrade infrastructure according to the TEN-T requirements to remove local bottlenecks, such as connecting loops, improvements to nodes and last-mile infrastructure or technical equipment enhancing operational performance.
Amendment 24 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Digitalisation is changing the world of work, improving productivity and enhancing flexibility, while alsocreating new employment and business opportunities, particularly in the context of the COVID- 19 pandemic, as well as increasing consumers’ choice while also potentially carrying some risks for employment and working conditions. Algorithm-based technologies, including automated monitoring and decision-making systems, have enabled the emergence and growth of digital labour platforms.
Amendment 27 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Mobility as a Service (MaaS),the Logistics as a Service (LaaS) and the collaborative mobility facilitated by the emergence of platforms with new digital and innovative solutions benefit considerably multimodality and reduces congestion in urban and sub-urban areas, saving time and efforts for consumers and enhancing the competitiveness of the related businesses
Amendment 37 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Platform work can provide opportunities for accessing the labour market more easily, gaining additional income through a secondary activity or enjoying some flexibility in the organisation of working time. In this regard, platform economy has become an integral and rapidly growing part of the European transport and tourism sectors, providing new business models, talent and work opportunities. At the same time, platform work brings challenges, as it can blur the boundaries between employment relationship and self- employed activity, and the responsibilities of employers and workers. Misclassification of the employment status has consequences for the persons affected, as it is likely to restrict access to existing labour and social rights. It also leads to an uneven playing field with respect to businesses that classify their workers correctly, and it has implications for Member States’ industrial relations systems, their tax base and the coverage and sustainability of their social protection systems. While such challenges are broader than platform work, they are particularly acute and pressing in the platform economy.
Amendment 56 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) This Directive should apply to all digital labour platforms, irrespective of their place of establishment and irrespective of the law otherwise applicable, provided that the platform work organised through that digital labour platform is performed in the Union. A targeted set of mandatory rules should be established at Union level to ensure minimum rights on working conditions in platform work while ensuring legal certainty and predictability for the most concerned sectors, such as in the fields of transport and tourism .
Amendment 102 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The contractual relationship between a digital labour platform that controls, within the meaning of paragraph 2, the performance of work and a person performing platform work through that platform shall be legally presumed to be an employment relationship. To that effect, Member States shall establish a framework of measures, in accordance with their national legal and judicial systems, in order to ensure that the legal presumption can be relied upon by competent authorities verifying compliance with or enforcing relevant legislation as well as persons performing platform work who dispute the classification of their employment status.
Amendment 119 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) requiring the person performing platform work to respect specific binding rules with regard to appearance, conduct towards the recipient of the service or performance of the work beyond what is required by law or necessary to safeguard the health and safety of the recipients of the service or to ensure the essential functioning of the service;;
Amendment 121 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) closely supervising the performance of work or thoroughly verifying the quality of the results of the work including by electronic means beyond what is required by law or necessary to safeguard the health and safety of the recipients of the service or to ensure the essential functioning of the service;
Amendment 131 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States shall take supporting measures to ensure the effective implementation of the legal presumption referred to in paragraph 1 while taking into account the impact on entrepreneurs and start-ups, avoiding capturing the genuine self-employed and supporting the conditions for innovation and the sustainable growth of digital labour platforms. In particular they shall:
Amendment 139 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) develop guidancecapacity building guidance, training for enforcement authorities to proactively target and pursue non-compliant digital labour platforms;
Amendment 143 #
2021/0414(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) (da) develop a consultation mechanism under which persons performing platform work or digital labour platforms can request the relevant authorities to pre-emptively assess, verify and justify the employment status of persons performing platform work on the basis of the control of the performance of work within the meaning of paragraph 2.
Amendment 102 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 as regards enhancing market data transparency, removing obstacles to the emergence of a consolidated tape, and optimising the trading obligations and prohibiting receiving payments for forwarding client orders (Text with EEA relevance)
Amendment 110 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 allows competent authorities to waive the pre-trade transparency requirements for market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue who determine their prices by reference to the midpoint price of the primary market or the most relevant market in terms of liquidity. As there is no justification for excluding the smallest orders from a transparent order book and in order to increase pre-trade transparency and thereby reinforce the price formation process, that waiver should be applicable to orders with a size greater than or equal toof a minimum at twice the standard market size. Further clarifications should be provided by ESMA. Where the consolidated tape for shares and exchange- traded funds (ETFs) will provide bid and offer prices from which a midpoint can be derived, the reference price waiver should also be available for systems deriving the midpoint price from the consolidated tape.
Amendment 115 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Dark trading is trading without pre- trade transparency, using the reference price waiver laid down in Article 4(1), point (a) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 and the negotiated trade waiver laid down in Article 4(a) point (a), point (i) of that Regulation. The use of both waivers is capped by the double volume cap (‘DVC’). The DVC is a mechanism that limits the level of dark trading to a certain proportion of total trading in an equity instrument. The amount of dark trading in an equity instrument on an individual venue may not exceed 4% of total trading in that instrument in the Union. When this threshold is breached, dark trading in that instrument on that venue is suspended. Secondly the amount of dark trading in an equity instrument in the Union may not exceed 8% of total trading in that instrument in the Union. When this threshold is breached all dark trading in that instrument is suspended. The venue specific threshold leaves room for continued use of those waivers on other platforms on which trading in that equity instrument is not yet suspended, until the Union wide threshold is breached. This causes complexity in terms of monitoring the levels of dark trading and of enforcing the suspension. To simplify the double volume cap while keeping its effectiveness, the new single volume cap should rely solely on the EU-wide threshold. That threshold should be lowered to 7 % to compensate for a potential increase of trading under those waivers as a consequence of abolishing the venue specific threshold. ESMA should be empowered to determine the DVC based on market conditions, the price formation process and liquidity available in the market.
Amendment 127 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to reinforce the price formation process and to maintain a level playing field between trading venues and systematic internalisers, Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 requires systematic internalisers to make public all quotes in equity instruments placed by that systematic internaliser below the standard market size. Systematic internalisers are free to decide which sizes they quote, as long as they quote at a minimum size of 10% of the standard market size. That possibility, however, has led to very low levels of pre-trade transparency provided by systematic internalisers in equity instruments, and has hampered the achievement of a level playing field. It is therefore necessary to require systematic internalisers to publish firm quotes relating to a minimum of twice the standard market size. ESMA should be empowered to determine the threshold in accordance with Article 4(6) point f.
Amendment 132 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to create a level playing field, in addition to the obligation to publish firm quotes relating to a minimum of twice the standard market size, systematic internalisers should also no longernot be allowed to match at midpoint below twice the standard market size. It should furthermore be clarified that systematic internalisers should be allowed to match at midpoint in so far as they comply with the tick-size rules in accordance with Article 49 of Directive 2014/65/EU when they trade above twice the standard market size but below the large in-scale threshold. When systematic internalisers trade above a large in-scale threshold, they should continue to be allowed to match at midpoint without complying with the tick- size regime. In order to clarify, ESMA should be empowered to determine the size appropriate for the market conditions.
Amendment 135 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Market participants need core market data to be able to make informed investment decisions. Pursuant to the current Article 27h of Regulation (EU) 600/2014, sourcing core market data about certain financial instruments directly from trading venues and APAs requires that consolidated tape providers enter into separate licensing agreements with all those data contributors. That process is burdensome, costly and time consuming. It has been one of the obstacles to consolidated tape providers emerging on a cross market basis. This obstacle should be removed in order to enable consolidated tape providers to obtain the market data and to overcome licencing issues. Trading venues and APAs, or investment firms and systematic internalisers without intervention of APAs (‘market data contributors’) should be required to submit their market data to consolidated tape providers, and to use harmonised templates respecting high–quality data standards to do so. Only CTPs selected and authorised by ESMA should be able to collect harmonised market data from the individual data sources in accordance with the mandatory contribution rule. To make the market data useful for investors, market data contributors should be required to provide the CTP with market data as close as technically possible to real time.no later than one minute after the transaction
Amendment 138 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Title II and III of Regulation (EU) 600/2014 require trading venues, APAs, investment firms and systematic internalisers (‘market data contributors’) to publish pre-trade data on financial instruments, including bid and offer prices and post-trade data on transactions, including the price and volume at which a transaction in a specific instrument has been concluded. Market participants are not obliged to use the consolidated core market data provided by the CTP. The requirement to publish those pre-trade and post-trade data should therefore remain applicable to enable market participants to access market data. However, to avoid undue burden on market data contributors, it is appropriate to align the requirement for market data contributors to publish data as much as possible with the requirement to contribute data to the CTP, which will require only post-trade data.
Amendment 145 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Competition among consolidated tape providers ensures that the consolidated tape is provided in the most efficient way and under the best conditions for users. However, no entity has, up until now, applied to act as a consolidated tape provider. It is therefore considered appropriate to empower ESMA to periodically organise a competitive selection procedure to select a single entity which is able to provide the consolidated tape for each specified asset class. Taking into account the novelty of the proposed scheme, ESMA should only mandate the provision of post-trade transparency data for the first selection procedure that it runs in relation to shares. At least 18 months before the launch of the second selection procedure, ESMA should submit a report to the Commission assessing whether there is market demand for extending the data contributed to the tape to pre-trade data. On the basis of such a report, the Commission should be empowered, by way of a delegated act, to further specify the depth of pre-trade data to the tapebonds, taking into account the set- up costs. ESMA should prioritise the selection and authorisation of a consolidated tape provider for bonds.
Amendment 156 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) According to data presented in the impact assessment accompanying the proposal for this Regulation, the expected revenue generation for the consolidated tape will vary depending on the precise features of the tape. The expected revenue of the CTP should significantly exceed the cost of its production, and therefore help to build a solid revenue participation scheme whereby the CTP and the market data contributors share aligned commercial interests. This principle should not prevent CTPs from making a necessary margin to maintain a viable business model and from using the core market data to offer further analytics or other services aimed to increase the revenue pool.
Amendment 161 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) There is an objective difference between a venue of primary admission and other trading venues that serve as secondary trading markets. A venue of primary admission admits companies to the public markets, playing a crucial role in the life of a share and for the share’s liquidity. This is particularly true in the case of shares listed on smaller regulated markets which remain typically traded mostly on the venue of primary admission. When the pre-trade transparent trading of a certain share takes place exclusively or predominantly on the venue of primary admission, such smaller venue plays a more important role in the price formation for that share. The core market data a smaller regulated market contributes to the consolidated tape therefore plays a more determining role in the price formation for the shares this venue admits to trading. A preferential treatment in the revenue participation scheme is therefore considered appropriate to allow these smOn that note, the CT can offer more visibility to the smaller exchanges. Therefore, it is important for aller exchanges to maintain their local admissions and safeguard a rich and vibrant ecosystemcontribute to the tape, which is, moreover, fully in line with the objectivesidea of the Capitinternal Mmarkets Union.
Amendment 163 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Small regulated markets are regulated markets which admit shares of issuers for which trading in the secondary market tends to be less liquid than the trading of shares admitted to trading on larger regulated markets. In order to avoid that lower trading volumes (or nominal values) penalise smaller exchanges in the revenue participation scheme designed for the consolidated tape for shares, data from trades in these less liquid shares should attract a higher remuneration than their notional trading value would indicate. Whether a shareThe desired outcome would be to provide end investors with a truly consolidated overview of the trading opportunities available in the Union and to increase the overall domestic and international attractiveness of the Union capital markets, isn less liquid should be determinedine with the objectives onf the basis of the proportion of pre-trade transparent liquidity displayed by the regulated market that admits the less liquid share, Capital Markets Union, and to include small regulated markets in the picture crelative to the average daily trading turnover in that shared by the consolidated tape.
Amendment 168 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Given the novelty of the consolidated tape in the context of the EU financial markets, ESMA should be entrusted with providing the European Commission with an assessment of the revenue participation scheme designed for regulated markets in the context of the consolidated tape for shares. This report should be prepared on the basis of at least 12 months of operation of the CTP and subsequently at the request of the Commission, where deemed necessary or appropriate. The assessment should focus in particular on whether the participation of small regulated markets in the revenue of the CTP is fair and effective in safeguarding the role that these markets play in their local financial ecosystem. The Commission should be empowered to revise the mechanism of allocation by way of a delegated act, where necessary or appropriate.
Amendment 172 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Financial intermediaries should strive to achieve the best possible price and the highest possible likelihood of execution for trades that they execute on behalf of their clients. To that end,ensure that the best execution requirement described in Article 27 of Directive 2014/65/EU can be met financial intermediaries should select the trading venue or counterparty for executing their client trades solely on the basis of achieving best execution for their clients. It should be incompatible with that principle of best execution that a financial intermediary receives a payment from a trading counterpart in exchange for ensuring the execution of client trades. Investment firms should be therefore be prohibited from receiving such payment.
Amendment 181 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35
(35) ‘consolidated tape provider’ or ‘CTP’ means a person authorised in accordance with Title IVa, Chapter 1 of this Regulation to provide the service of collecting market data for shares, ETFs, bonds or derivatives, from market data contributors, and of consolidating those data into a continuous electronic live data stream providing core market data per share, ETF, bond or derivatives and of providing them to user of market data;;
Amendment 183 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a
Amendment 184 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 192 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (ii)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (ii)
Amendment 196 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (iii)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (iii)
Amendment 199 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 202 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (v)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (v)
Amendment 204 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vi)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vi)
Amendment 206 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii)
Amendment 208 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 211 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 2
Amendment 214 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 3
Amendment 217 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 4
Amendment 219 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a - point (vii) – indent 5
Amendment 222 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a– point viii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point a– point viii
Amendment 226 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point b – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 b – point b – introductory part
(b) all of the following data on nbon- equitieds:
Amendment 231 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 4 – paragraph 1– point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1– point a
Amendment 232 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii
Amendment 234 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point f (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point f (new)
(b a) in paragraph 6, the following point is added: "(b a) the minimum size of an order that may be matched using the trading methodology referred to in paragraph 1(a), which shall not be lower than twice the standard market size."
Amendment 239 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Trading venues shall suspend their use of the waivers referred to in Article 4(1), point (a), and 4(1), point (b)(i) where the percentage of volume traded in the Union in a financial instrument carried out under those waivers exceeds 7% of the total volume traded in that financial instrument in the Union as determined by ESMA according to Article 5 (9) of this regulation. Trading venues shall base their decision to suspend the use of those waivers on the data published by ESMA in accordance with paragraph 4, and shall take such decision within two working days after this publication of those data and for a period of six months.;
Amendment 256 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 283 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. This Article and Articles 15, 16 and 17 shall apply to systematic internalisers when they deal in sizes up to twiche the standard market sizereshold determined by ESMA in accordance with Article 4(6)(f). Systematic internalisers shall not be subject to this Article and Articles 15, 16 and 17 when they deal in sizes above twice the standard market sizehat threshold.
Amendment 287 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Systematic internalisers are allowed to quote any size. The minimum quoting size shall be at least the equivalentthe minimum of twice the standard market size of a share, depositary receipt, ETF, certificate, or other financial instrument that is similar to those financial instruments and that is traded on a trading venue. For a particular share, depository receipt, ETF, certificate or other financial instrument that is similar to those financial instruments and that is traded on a trading venue, each quote shall include a firm bid and offer price, or firm bid and offer prices for a size or sizes which could be up to twice the standard market size for the class of shares, depositary receipts, ETFs, certificates or financial instruments that are similar to those financial instruments, to whhe minimum of twiche the financial instrument belongsstandard market size. The price or prices shall reflect the prevailing market conditions for that share, depositary receipt, ETF, certificate or financial instrument that is similar to those financial instruments.;
Amendment 310 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 9
Article 1 – paragraph 9
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 17a – paragraph 2
Article 17a – paragraph 2
2. The application of the tick sizes set in accordance with Article 49 of Directive 2014/65/EU shall not prevent systematic internalisers from matching orders large in scale at mid-point within the current bid and offer prices. Matching orders at mid- point within the current bid and offer prices below large in scale but above twiche the standard market sizereshold determined by ESMA in accordance with Article 4(6)(f) shall be allowed in so far as those tick sizes are complied with.;
Amendment 319 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22 a – paragraph 1
Article 22 a – paragraph 1
1. Market data contributors shall, with regard to shares, ETFs and bonds that are traded on a trading venue, and with regard to OTC derivatives as defined in Article 2(7) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 that are subject to the clearing obligation as referred to in Article 4 of that Regulation,bonds provide the CTP with all the market data as set out in Article 22b(2) as needed for the CTP to be operational. Those market data shall be provided in a harmonised format, through a high quality transmission protocol, and as close to real- time as is technically possibleno later than one minute after the transaction by all trading venues.
Amendment 347 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 1
Article 22b – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall set up an expert stakeholder group by [OP add 3 months as of entry into force] to provide advice on the quality and the substance of market data, the common interpretation of market data and the quality of the transmission protocol referred to in Article 22a(1). TESMA should work closely with the expert stakeholder group which shall provide advice on a yearly basis. That advice shall be made public.
Amendment 349 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – first subparagraph
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – first subparagraph
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adESMA should developt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50 to specify the quality and the substance of the market data and the quality of the transmission protocolraft regulatory standards.
Amendment 351 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – second subparagraph – introductory part
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – second subparagraph – introductory part
Those delegated actregulatory technical standards shall in particular specify all of the following:
Amendment 353 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – third subparagraph
Article 22b – paragraph 2 – third subparagraph
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by […]. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account the advice from ESMA and from the technical expert group established in accordance with paragraph 2, international developments, and standards agreed at Union or international level. The Commission shall ensure that the delegated actregulatory technical standards adopted take into account the reporting requirements laid down in Articles 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 20, 21 and 27g.
Amendment 360 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 11 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 11 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
(11 b) in Article 26, paragraph 1, is replaced by the following: "1. Investment firms which execute transactions in financial instruments shall report complete and accurate details of such transactions to the competent authority as quickly as possible, and no later than the close of the following working day. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014L0065-20220228)Following an impact assessment of the European Commission, further alignements to other regulations such as UCITS, AIFMD or EMIR can be advantageous. However, additional reporting and unproportionate requirements shall not be the outcome of such a review. Or. en
Amendment 362 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – title
Article 27da – title
Article 27da Selection process for the authorisation of a single consolidated tape provider for each asset clasbonds
Amendment 367 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 1
Article 27da – paragraph 1
1. By [OP insert date 3 months as of entry into force], ESMA shall organise a selection procedure for the appointment of the CTP for a five year term. ESMA shall organise a separate selection procedure for each of the following asset classes: shares, exchange traded funds, bonds and derivatives (or relevant subclasses of derivatives).term deemed appropriate keeping in mind the set-up costs which will be incurred by the CTP. ESMA should organise a separate selection procedure for bonds
Amendment 370 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 27da – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For each of the asset classebonds referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA shall assess the applications on the basis of the following criteria:
Amendment 392 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 3
Article 27da – paragraph 3
3. The first selection procedure organised for shares shall only invite bids for the provision of a consolidated tape containing one minute delayed post trade data. Prior to subsequent selection procedures, ESMA shall assess market demand and revenue impacts on regulated markets and based on that assessment, report to the Commission on the opportunity of adding best bids and offers and corresponding volumes to the tape as well as on the possible improvement to the tape, including on the speed of publication. Based on that report and on the experience gained further to the first selection procedure, the Commission is empowered to adopt a delegated act specifying the appropriate level of pre- trade data to be contributed to the CTPmeasures for improving the data tape.
Amendment 398 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 4
Article 27da – paragraph 4
4. The selection of the CTP for sharebonds shall, in addition to the criteria in paragraph 2, consider the revenue participation scheme, and in particular the formula, applicable to regulated markets that are market data contributors. ESMA shall, when considering the competing tenders, select the CTP for sharebonds that offers the revenue participation scheme that provides regulated markets, in particular smaller regulated markets, with the highest amount of revenue that remains for distribution once deducted operating costs and a small incentivising margin which is deemed appropriate and reasonable margin. This revenue shall be distributed in accordance with Article 27h(1)(c), and in a manner commensurate to the market data contributed according to Article 22a.
Amendment 407 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Article 1 – paragraph 15
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27da – paragraph 5
Article 27da – paragraph 5
5. ESMA shallould adopt a fully reasoned decision selecting and authorising the entities operating the consolidated tapes within 3 months as of initiation of the selection procedure referred to in paragraph 2. Such reasoned decision shall specify the conditions under which the CTPs shall operate, and in particular the level of fees referred to in paragraph 2, point (g) and for sharebonds the level of the participation referred to in paragraph 3, in particular for smaller regulated markets.
Amendment 415 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) in the case of market data concerning shares, redistribute part of their revenues for the purposes of covering the cost related to mandatory contribution and of ensuring a fairreasonable level of participation for regulated markets, and in particular smaller regulated markets, in the revenue generated by the consolidated tape, in accordance with Article 27da(4);
Amendment 420 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) make consolidated core market data, for the provision of which the CTP is selected in accordance with Article 27da, available in accordance with the data quality requirements set out in Article 22b to users into a continuous electronic data stream on non-discriminatory terms as close to real time as technically possibleno later than one minute after the transaction;
Amendment 426 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph
Article 27h – paragraph 1 – second subparagraph
For the purpose of establishing the participarevenue redistribution in point (c), the revenue of the CTP shall be allocated among regulated markets according to a formula that reflects the proportion of pre-trade transparent liquidity in shares displayed by a regulated market relativcore market data provided while taking into account the ratio of market data revenue to the aoverage daily turnover in these shares in the Unionll revenue within the legal group structure.
Amendment 435 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 16
Article 1 – paragraph 16
4. After 12 months of full operation of the CTP for sharebonds, ESMA shall provide the Commission with a motivated opinn evaluation on the effectiveness and fairness of the level of participation of regulated markets in the revenues generated by the CTP as set out in accordance with the second subparagraph of paragraph 1. The Commission may request ESMA to provide further opinionassessments, where necessary or appropriate. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 50 to revise the allocation key for the revenue redistribution, where appropriate.;
Amendment 446 #
2021/0385(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 26
Article 1 – paragraph 26
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39 a (new)
Amendment 24 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Article 27(3) and 27 (6) of Directive 2014/65/EU contains the requirement for execution platforms to publish a list of details relating to best execution. Factual evidence and feedback from stakeholders has shown that those reports are rarely read and do not enable investors or any users of those reports to make meaningful comparisons based on the information provided in those reports. As a consequence, Directive (EU) 2021/338 of the European Parliament and of the Council21 suspended the reporting requirement under Article 27 (3) for two years in order for that requirement to be reviewed. Regulation (EU) XX/XXXX22 has amended Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 to remove the obstacles that have prevented the emergence of a consolidated tape. Among the data that the consolidated tape is expected to provide are post-trade information regarding all transactions in financial instrumentsxed income. That information can be used for proving best execution. The reporting requirement laid down in Article 27(3) and 27 (6) of Directive 2014/65/EU will therefore no longer be relevant and should therefore be deleted. __________________ 21 Directive (EU) 2021/338 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 amending Directive 2014/65/EU as regards information requirements, product governance and position limits, and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/878 as regards their application to investment firms, to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis (OJ L 68, 26.2.2021, p. 14). 22 COM 727
Amendment 30 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) are members of or participants in a regulated market or an MTF with the exception for non-financial entities who execute transactions on a trading venue for the purpose of commercial activity or treasury financing activity;
Amendment 33 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Amendment 39 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point –a 1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point –a 1 (new)
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 41 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 27 – paragraph 3
Article 27 – paragraph 3
(a) paragraph 3 is deleted;replaced by the following: "3. Member States shall require that for financial instruments subject to the trading obligation in Articles 23 and 28 Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 that following execution of a transaction on behalf of a client the investment firm shall inform the client where the order was executed. "
Amendment 42 #
2021/0384(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a a (new)
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 27 – paragraph 6
Article 27 – paragraph 6
(a a) paragraph 6 is deleted
Amendment 15 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) As new legislative acts are currently under negotiation or at the point of completion, but are not listed in the Annex of this regulation, the Commission should be empowered to update the Annex to add newly adopted legislation related to the provision of financial services, capital markets and sustainability.
Amendment 18 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The objective of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is to protect the public interest by contributing to the stability and effectiveness of the financial system for the Union economy, its citizens and businesses. In that context, ESMA is to contribute in particular to ensure the integrity, transparency, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets. It has, amongst others, the task to improve investor protection. Because of those reasons, ESMA should be given the task of establishing and operat, operating and controlling ESAP.
Amendment 19 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Re-using information that is available on ESAP can improve the functioning of the internal market and promote the development of new services that combine and make use of such information. It is therefore necessary, where justified on grounds of a public interest objective, to allow re-use of the information that is available on ESAP for purposes other than the purposes for which the information was drawn up. However, the use and re-use of that information should be subject to objective, proportionate and non-discriminatory conditions. For that purpose, conditions corresponding to those laid down in open, standard licences within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should apply. The licensing terms of those standard licences should allow for data and content to be freely accessible, used, modified and shared by anyone for any purpose. ESMA should bear no liability for the use and re-use of information accessible on ESAP. The submission of information by the collection bodies should either not be subject to conditions or be subject to an open standard licence enabling the licensing terms applying for information accessible in the ESAP. _________________ 27 Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information (OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, p. 56).
Amendment 21 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) To promote data-driven innovation in finance, help integrate capital markets in the European Union, channel investments into sustainable activities, and bring efficiencies for consumers and businesses, ESAP should improve access to information that include personal data. ESAP should, however, only improve access to those personal data that have to be processed pursuant to Union law, or that are processed voluntarily provided that there is a lawful ground for such processing pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. For any processing of personal data in the context of providing information via ESAP, the collection bodies, and ESMA in its capacity as operatocontroller of ESAP, should ensure that Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council28 are complied with. _________________ 28 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
Amendment 22 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered an opinion on [insert date]19 January 2022.
Amendment 23 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In order for the information to be comparable over time, users should have access to past information. It is therefore necessary to require ESAP to provide access to information for a reasonable period of time, to the extent compatible with other applicable provisions of Union law. For that purpose, ESMA should ensure that no personal data are made accessible for longer than necessary as provided for under Union law. In order to enable ESMA and the collection bodies to prepare the operation of ESAP, ESAP should only provide access to the information submittedcurrently available as from 1 January 2024.
Amendment 24 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) For the purposes of ensuring high quality and accuracy of data to be published on ESAP, ESMA should be allowed to pre-screen information provided by entities in order to validate the accuracy and format of the data provided before it is published on ESAP.
Amendment 25 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to amend the Annexes in order to update the list of legislative acts at the moment any new relevant legislative act enters into force.
Amendment 26 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Amendment 29 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7 a) 'personal data' means data as defined in Article 4, point 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/279;
Amendment 33 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) where possible, ensure that any voluntarily submitted information is submitted in the format provided in existing templates related to the relevant legislative act;
Amendment 40 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Where the information referred to in paragraph 1 contains personal data, entities shall ensure that the processing relies on one of the lawful grounds of processing listed in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In particular, consent cannot be considered as a legal basis to submit information containing personal. This Regulation does not create a legal basis for the processing of personal data by those entities.
Amendment 55 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. ESMA shall perform automated validations, where possible in an automated manner, to verify compliance of the information submitted by the collection bodies with the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), point (b).
Amendment 56 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. ESMA shall be empowered to screen the data provided by entities in order to ensure the accuracy of the information provided. In the case of incorrect or inaccurate data, ESMA shall follow the procedure as laid out in paragraph 2 of this Article.
Amendment 57 #
2021/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) act as controller of the ESAP, holding the responsibilities outlined in Articles 24-27 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 76 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Certain characteristics of the ELTIF market, including the low number of funds, the small net asset size, the low number of jurisdictions in which ELTIFs are domiciled, and a portfolio composition that is skewed towards certain eligible investment categories, demonstrate the concentrated nature of that market, both geographically and in terms of investment type. It is therefore necessary to review the functioning of the ELTIF legal framework to ensure that more investments are channelled to businesses in need of capital and to long-term investment projects. In addition, further action is needed to remove existing tax barriers and introduce tax incentives, in order to ensure an adequate level playing field across Europe that would pave the way for a truly cross-border market for this type of funds.
Amendment 96 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) It is necessary to extend the scope of eligible assets and promote the investments of ELTIFs in securitised assets. It should therefore be clarified that, where the underlying assets consist of long-term exposures, eligible investment assets should also include simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisations as referred to in Article 182(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 . Those long-term exposures comprise securitisations of residential loans that are secured by one or more mortgages on residential immovable property (residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS)), commercial loans that are secured by one or more mortgages on commercial immovable property, corporate loans, including loans which are granted to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and trade receivables or other underlying exposures that the originator considers to form a distinct asset type, provided that the proceeds from securitising those trade receivables or other underlying exposures are used for financing or refinancing long- term investments. _________________ 14 Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation, and amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC and 2011/61/EU and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 347, 28.12.2017, p. 35).
Amendment 108 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The diversification requirements laid down in the current version of Regulation (EU) 2015/760 were introduced to ensure that ELTIFs can withstand adverse market circumstances. Those diversification thresholds imply, however, that ELTIFs are, on average, required to make ten distinct investments. In relation to investment in projects or infrastructures of large scale, the requirement to make ten investments per ELTIF may be difficult to achieve, and costly in terms of transactional costs and capital allocation. To reduce transaction and administrative costs for ELTIFs and ultimately their investors, ELTIFs should therefore be able to pursue more concentrated investment strategies and thus to be exposed to fewer eligible assets. It is therefore necessary to adjust the diversification requirements for ELTIFs’ exposures to single qualifying portfolio undertakings, single real assets, collective investment undertakings and certain other eligible investment assets, contracts and financial instruments. That additional flexibility in the portfolio composition of ELTIFs and the reduction in the diversification requirements should not materially affect the capacity of ELTIFs to withstand market volatility, since ELTIFs typically invest in assets that often do not have a readily available market quotation, may be highly illiquid, and frequently have long-term maturity or time horizon. Those diversification thresholds should not be applicable, in any case, to funds that are marketed as fund-of-fund structures.
Amendment 126 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/760 currently requires that ELTIFs invest at least 70 % of their capital in eligible investment assets. This high threshold for the composition of eligible investment assets in ELTIFs’ portfolios was initially established in view of the focus of ELTIFs on long-term investments and the contribution such investments would make to the financing of a sustainable growth of the Union’s economy. Given the illiquid and idiosyncratic nature of certain eligible investment assets within ELTIFs’ portfolios, however, it may prove difficult and costly for ELTIF managers to manage the liquidity of ELTIFs, honour redemption requests, enter into borrowing arrangements, and execute other elements of ELTIFs’ investment strategies pertaining to the transfer, valuation and pledging of such eligible investment assets. Lowering the eligible investment assets threshold down to 50 % would enable ELTIF managers to better manage the liquidity of ELTIFs.
Amendment 127 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Leverage is frequently used to enable the day-to-day operation of an ELTIF and to carry out a specific investment strategy. Moderate amounts of leverage can amplify returns, and, where controlled adequately, without incurring or exacerbating excessive risks. In addition, leverage can frequently be used by a variety of collective investment undertakings to gain additional efficiencies or operational results. Since the borrowing of cash threshold is currently limited to 30% of the capital of the ELTIF, ELTIF managers may be unable to successfully pursue certain investment strategies, including in the case of investments in real assets, where using higher levels of leverage is an industry norm or is otherwise required to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns. It is therefore appropriate to increase the flexibility of managers of ELTIFs to raise further capital during the life of the ELTIF. In view of the possibleorder to allow ELTIF managers to raise capital more efficiently (while keeping an eye on the potential risks that leverage canould entail), ELTIFs marketed to retail investors should be permitted to borrow cash amounting to up to 5100 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF. The 50 % threshold is appropriate given the overall borrowing of cash limits common for funds investing in real assets with a similar liquidity and redemption profile. As for ELTIFs marketed to professional investors, however, a higher leverage threshold should be permitted, because professional investors have a higher risk-tolerance than retail investors. TNet Asset Value (NAV). As a consequence of this, the borrowing of cash threshold for ELTIFs that are marketed to professional investors only should thereforeequally be extended to 100 % of the ELTIF capitalnet asset value (NAV).
Amendment 138 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) ELTIFs should be able to encumber their assets to implement their borrowing strategy. To address concerns about shadow banking activities, however, cash borrowed by ELTIFs should not be used to grant loans to qualifying portfolio undertakings. However, to increase the flexibility of ELTIFs in executing their borrowing strategy, the borrowing arrangements should not count as borrowing where that borrowing is fully covered by investors’ capital commitments.
Amendment 143 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/760 currently requires that investors in an ELTIF may request the winding down of that ELTIF where their redemption requests, made in accordance with the ELTIF’s redemption policy, have not been satisfied within one year from the date on which those requests were made. Given the long-term orientation of ELTIFs and the often idiosyncratic and illiquid asset profile of ELTIFs’ portfolios, the entitlement of any investor or a group of investors to request the winding down of an ELTIF can be disproportionate and detrimental to both the successful execution of the ELTIF investment strategy and the interests of other investors or groups of investors. It is therefore appropriate to delete the possibility for investors to require the winding down of an ELTIF where that ELTIF is unable to satisfy redemption requests. ELTIF managers should, in any case, be entitled to determine the redemption frequencies.
Amendment 199 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 11 – paragraph 3 (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 (new)
(6 a) in Article 11, the following paragraph is added: "3. Paragraph 1, point (a), of this Article shall not apply to technology-based financial companies providing financial services that qualify as “financial undertakings” when the company falls into the category of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as defined in Article 2(1) of the Annex to the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003.";
Amendment 204 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. An ELTIF shall invest at least 650 % of its capital in eligible investment assets.
Amendment 226 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The aggregate value of units or shares of ELTIFs, EuvECAs, EuSEFs, UCITS and of EU AIFs managed by EU AIFM in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 40 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF.;net asset value (NAV).
Amendment 228 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 13 – paragraph 3a
Article 13 – paragraph 3a
3a. The aggregate value of simple, transparent and standardised securitisations in an ELTIF portfolio shall not exceed 2030 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF.;net asset value (NAV).
Amendment 234 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. The aggregate risk exposure to a counterparty of the ELTIF stemming from OTC derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, or reverse repurchase agreements shall not exceed 10 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF.;Net Asset Value (NAV).
Amendment 238 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point f a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point f a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 13 – paragraph 8a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 8a (new)
(f a) The following paragraph is added: '8a. The requirements included in paragraph 2 of the present article should not apply to those funds which are marketed as fund-of-fund structures.';
Amendment 242 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it represents no more than 5100 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF, and no more than 100 % of the value of the capital of the ELTIF for ELTIFs marketed solely to professional investorsnet asset value (NAV);
Amendment 248 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it serves the purpose of making investments or providing liquidity, including to pay costs and expenses, except for loans as referred to in Article 10, point (c), provided that the holdings in cash or cash equivalents of the ELTIF are not sufficient to make the investment concerned;
Amendment 256 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Article 18 – paragraph 7
7. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the minimum information to be provided to competent authorities under Article 18(2), point (b), and the criteria to assess the percentage referred to in Article 18(2), point (d), taking into account the ELTIF’s expected cash flows and liabilities. The draft regulatory technical standards must ensure that ELTIF managers are entitled to define the redemption frequency, which not be shorter than a month;
Amendment 276 #
2021/0377(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EU) 2015/760
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. No later than [date of the entry into force + 5 years], the Commission shall start a reviewubmit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report ofn the application and enforcement of this Regulation. Theat reviewport shall analyse, in particular: t least analyse the following elements:
Amendment 98 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The full traceability of transfers of funds and crypto-assets can be a particularly important and valuable tool in the prevention, detection and investigation of money laundering and terrorist financing, as well as in the implementation of restrictive measures, in particular those imposed by Regulations (EC) No 2580/2001, (EC) No 881/2002 and (EU) No 356/2010, in compliance with Union regulations implementing such measures. It is therefore appropriate, in order to ensure the transmission of information throughout the payment or transfers of crypto-assets chain, to provide for a system imposing the obligation on payment service providers and crypto-asset service providers to accompany transfers of funds and crypto- assets with information on the payer and the payee , and, for transfers of crypto- assets, on the originator and the beneficiary.
Amendment 102 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Transfers of funds corresponding to services referred to in points (a) to (m) and (o) of Article 3 of Directive (EU) 2015/236647 do not fall within the scope of this Regulation. It is also appropriate to exclude from the scope of this Regulation transfers of funds that represent a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing. Such exclusions should cover payment cards, electronic money instruments, mobile phones or other digital or information technology (IT) prepaid or postpaid devices with similar characteristics, where they are used exclusively for the purchase of consumer goods orand services only and the number of the card, instrument or device accompanies all transfers. However, the use of a payment card, an electronic money instrument, a mobile phone, or any other digital or IT prepaid or postpaid device with similar characteristics in order to effect a person- to-person transfer of funds, falls within the scope of this Regulation. In addition, Automated Teller Machine withdrawals, payments of taxes, fines or other levies, transfers of funds carried out through cheque images exchanges, including truncated cheques, or bills of exchange, and transfers of funds where both the payer and the payee are payment service providers acting on their own behalf should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation. __________________ 47 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35).
Amendment 105 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In order to reflect the special characteristics of national payment and crypto-asset transfer systems, and provided that it is always possible to trace the transfer of funds back to the payer or the transfer of crypto-assets back to the beneficiary , Member States should be able to exempt from the scope of this Regulation certain domestic low-value transfers of funds, including electronic giro payments, or low-value transfers of crypto- assets, used for the purchase of consumer goods or services only.
Amendment 106 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In order to reflect the special characteristics of national payment and crypto-asset transfer systems, and provided that it is always possible to trace the transfer of funds back to the payer or the transfer of crypto-assets back to the beneficiary originator, Member States should be able to exempt from the scope of this Regulation certain domestic low-value transfers of funds, including electronic giro payments, or low-value transfers of crypto- assets, used for the purchase of goods or services.
Amendment 123 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The crypto-asset service provider of the originator should ensure that transfers of crypto-assets are accompanied by the name of the originator, the originator’s account number, where such an account exists and is used to process the transaction, and the originator’s address, nationality, official personal document number, customer identification number or date and place of birth. The crypto-asset service provider of the originator should also ensure that transfers of crypto-assets are accompanied by the name of the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s account number, where such an account exists and is used to process the transaction.
Amendment 133 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) The number of working days in the Member State of the payment service provider of the payer or crypto-asset service provider of the beneficiaryoriginator determines the number of days to respond to requests for information on the payer or the originator .
Amendment 134 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39 a (new)
Recital 39 a (new)
(39a) The use of mixing and tumbling services should only be allowed in circumstances where it can be shown that the use of such services is necessary to overcome legitimate concerns, such as for privacy reasons. The receiver of crypto- assets that have been used in mixing and tumbling services should demonstrate, where necessary, the legitimacy of the practice for which the crypto-asset is used. Where the legitimacy of its use cannot be proven, the transaction should be prohibited.
Amendment 138 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
Recital 41 a (new)
(41a) In order to ensure that competent authorities are able to efficiently investigate suspicious transactions and detect illicit use of crypto-assets and transfers of funds, the supervisory authorities should consider greater use of both regulatory and supervisory technology in their investigative processes.
Amendment 139 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) In order to rapidly address concerns about illicit transfers of funds and particularly crypto-assets, it is important that this Regulation enters into force as soon as possible. For that reason, any references to future regulations should not hinder the Union from taking action against the illicit transfer of funds and crypto-assets in the immediate term. This Regulation should be adapted to align with future legislation on Anti- Money Laundering and the Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets;
Amendment 142 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation shall apply to transfers of funds, in any currency, or crypto-assets covered under the scope of Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937-COM/2020/593 final], as well as those crypto-assets which would fall under existing financial legislation as outlined in Article 2 paragraph 2 of [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937- COM/2020/593 final], which are sent or received by a payment service provider , a crypto-asset service provider, or an intermediary payment service provider established in the Union.
Amendment 148 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) that card, instrument or device is used exclusively to pay for consumer goods orand services only; and
Amendment 149 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
This regulation shall not apply either to transfers involving crypto-assets carried out by actors regulated under Directive 2015/2366 using payment card or an electronic money instrument or any other digital or IT prepaid or postpaid device with similar characteristics where the conditions referred to in points (a) and (b) are met. However, this Regulation shall apply when a payment card, an electronic money instrument or a mobile phone, or any other digital or IT prepaid or postpaid device with similar characteristics, is used in order to effect a person-to-person transfer of funds or crypto-assets .
Amendment 153 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
This Regulation shall not apply to person- to-person transfer of crypto-assets where it is determined that these transactions are carried out by natural persons who are identifiable.
Amendment 177 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘person-to-person transfer of funds’ means a transaction between identifiable natural persons acting, as consumers, for purposes other than trade, business or profession;
Amendment 178 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14
(14) ‘person-to-person transfer of crypto-assets’ means a transaction between identifiable natural persons acting, as consumers, for purposes other than trade, business or profession, without the use or involvement of a crypto-asset service provider or other obliged entity;
Amendment 179 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15
(15) ‘crypto-asset’ means a crypto-asset as defined in Article 3(1), point 2 of Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937-COM/2020/593 final] except when falling under the categories listed in Article 2(2) of that Regulation or otherwise qualifying as fundsdigital representation of a value or a right for direct investment or finance purposes that uses cryptography for security and is in the form of a coin or a token or any other digital medium of distributed ledgers, and which may be transferred and stored electronically, using distributed ledger technology or similar technology.
Amendment 180 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘crypto-asset service provider ’ means a crypto-asset service provider as defined in Article 3(1), point (8) of [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937- COM/2020/593 final] where performing one or more crypto-asset services as defined in Article 3(1) point (9) of [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937- COM/2020/593 final]ny person whose occupation or business is the provision of one or more crypto-asset services to third parties on a professional basis;
Amendment 222 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the originator’s address, nationality, official personal document number, customer identification number or date and place of birth.
Amendment 302 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a Use of mixing and tumbling services 1. Crypto-asset service providers offering mixing or tumbling services, privacy wallets, or other anonymising services for transfers of crypto-assets or other obliged entities shall request users of those services, to provide a justification of legitimate use, where appropriate, for the purposes of mitigating money laundering and terrorist financing.
Amendment 326 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall update and align this Regulation where necessary following the entry into force of Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937-COM/2020/593 final] and Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a regulation on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and repealing Directive (EU) 2015/849].
Amendment 335 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 a (new)
Article 31 a (new)
Article 31 a Alignment with Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets] Following the publication of Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937- COM/2020/593 final] in the Official Journal of the European Union, power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting within 3 months a delegated act aligning the definitions contained in article 3, paragraph 1, points 13, 14, 15 and 16 of this Regulation to those in the Regulation [please insert reference – proposal for a Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937- COM/2020/593 final], in case there are any discrepancies.
Amendment 338 #
2021/0241(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 b (new)
Article 31 b (new)
Amendment 140 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council47 already set CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles as well as for certain heavy-duty vehicles. The revision of those instruments should be aligned with the revision of the current Regulation in order to ensure a coherent framework for the use and deployment of alternative fuels in road transport and in order to accelerate the uptake in particular of zero-emission vehicles and thereby create demand for recharging and refuelling infrastructure. _________________ 46 Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 443/2009 and (EU) No 510/2011 (OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 13). 47 Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles and amending Regulations (EC) No 595/2009 and (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/53/EC (OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 202).
Amendment 142 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
Amendment 143 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The initiatives on ReFuelEU aviation48 and FuelEU maritime49 should boost the production and uptake of sustainable alternative fuels in aviation and maritime transport. While the fuel use requirements for the sustainable aviation fuels can largely rely on the existing refuelling infrastructure, investments are needed for the electricity supply of stationary aircraft. Moreover, Member State should assess the current state and future development of the hydrogen market for aviation and should provide for a feasibility study on the deployment of the relevant infrastructure to power aircrafts including, where appropriate, a deployment plan for alternative fuels infrastructure in airports, in particular for hydrogen and electric recharging for aircrafts. The FuelEU maritime initiative sets requirements in particular for the use of on shore power that can only be fulfilled if an adequate level of on shore power supply is deployed in TEN-T ports. However those initiatives do not contain any provisions on the required fuel infrastructure which are a prerequisite that the targets can be met. Furthermore, the Energy Taxation Directive1a recast should incentivise the use of on shore power. Therefore, alignment between this Directive and the current Regulation is necessary in order to ensure a coherent framework for the use and deployment of alternative fuels. _________________ 1a COM(2021) 563 48 COM(2021) 561. 49 COM(2021) 562.
Amendment 151 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Therefore all modes of transport should be addressed in one instrument which should take into account a variety of alternative fuels. The use of zero-emission powertrain technologies is at different stages of maturity in the different modes of transport. In particular, in the road sector, a rapid uptake of battery-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles is taking place, therefore more ambitious targets for these mature technologies are required. Hydrogen fuel- cell road vehicles are available to markets, as well. In addition, smaller hydrogen and battery electric vessels, solar-electric cars, and hydrogen fuel-cell trains are currently being deployed in different projects and in first commercial operations, with full commercial roll out expected in the next years. In contrast, the aviation and waterborne sectors continue to be dependent on liquid and gaseous fuels, as zero- and low-emission powertrain solutions are expected to enter the market only around 2030 and in particular for the aviation sector even later, with full commercialisation taking its time. Therefore, the principle of technological neutrality should be respected in these sectors in order to boost the uptake of new and developing technologies. The use of fossil gaseous or liquid fuels is only possible if it is clearly embedded into a clear decarbonisation pathway that is in line with the long-term objective of climate neutrality in the Union, requiring increasing blending with or replacement by renewable fuels such as bio-methane, advanced biofuels or renewable and low- carbon synthetic gaseous and liquid fuels as soon as possible, ensuring further decarbonisation of heavy duty transport in the short term.
Amendment 226 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21 a) Bidirectional charging at both private and publicly accessible infrastructure could encourage people to purchase electric vehicles, as they can then be used for mobility as well as energy storage. Therefore, legislative hurdles such as double taxation should be prevented in order to further develop the business case of bidirectional charging and a sufficient number of private and publicly accessible charging stations should be made available for smart, bidirectional charging.
Amendment 239 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Price transparency is crucial to ensure seamless and easy recharging and refuelling. Users of alternative fuel vehicles should be given accurate price information before the start of the recharging or refuelling service. The price should be communicated in a clearly structured manner to allow end users to identify the differentapplicable cost components and anticipate the total cost.
Amendment 240 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(24 a) The establishment of an information and reservation system on the availability of recharging and refuelling points and estimated waiting times should be provided to end users.
Amendment 243 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
Recital 25 a (new)
(25 a) In order to ensure the security and stability of the network of recharging points across the Union, operators of digitally connected recharging points should comply with minimum cybersecurity rules as laid down in the Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2 Directive)1a. _________________ 1a COM/2020/823 final
Amendment 250 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Hydrogen fuelled vehicles should be able to refuel at or close to the destination, which is usually located in an urban area. To ensure that publicly accessible destination refuelling is possible at least in the main urban areas, all urban nodes as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 should provide such refuelling stations. Within the urban nodes, public authorities should consider to deploy the stations within multimodal freight centres as those are not only the typical destination for heavy-duty vehicles but could also serve hydrogen to other transport modes, such as rail and inland shipping. Long distance collective passenger transport should also be enabled to make use of hydrogen refuelling stations at coach parking areas and terminals. _________________ 55 Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1).
Amendment 251 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Hydrogen fuelled vehicles should be able to refuel at or close to the destination, which is usually located in an urban area. To ensure that publicly accessible destination refuelling is possible at least in the main urban areas, all urban nodes as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council55 should provide such refuelling stations. Within the urban nodes, public authorities should consider to deploy the stations within multimodal freight centres aso those are not only the typical destination for heavy-duty vehicles but couldat they can also serve hydrogen to other transport modes, such as rail and inland shipping. _________________ 55 Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1).
Amendment 271 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Users of alternative fuel vehicles should be able to pay easily and conveniently at all publicly accessible recharging and refuelling points, without the need to enter into a contract with the operator of the recharging or refuelling point or a mobility service provider. Therefore, for recharging or refuelling on an ad hoc basis, all publicly accessible recharging and refuelling points should accept payment instruments that are widely used in the Union, and in particular electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services, at least via payment cards. That ad hoc payment method should always be available to consumers, even when contract-based payments are offered at the recharging or refuelling point.
Amendment 272 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) UThe aim is for users of alternative fuel vehicles shouldto be able to pay easily and conveniently at all publicly accessible recharging and refuelling points, without the need to enter into a contract with the operator of the recharging or refuelling point or a mobility service provider. Therefore, for recharging or refuelling on an ad hoc basis, all publicly accessible recharging and refuelling points should accept payment instruments that are widely used in the Union, and in particular electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services. That ad hoc payment method should always be available to consumers, even when contract-based payments are offered at the recharging or refuelling point.
Amendment 352 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) The Commission shall undertake to facilitate the development and implementation of the revised national policy frameworks of the Member States should be facilitated by the Commission by means of exchanges of information and best practices between the Member States.
Amendment 368 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) In light of the increasing diversity in the type of fuels for motorised vehicles coupled with on-going growth in the road mobility of citizens across the Union, it is necessary to provide vehicle users with clear and easy-to-understand information on the fuels available at refuelling stations and on the compatibility of their vehicle with different fuels or recharging points on the Union market. It is equally necessary to provide vehicle users with information on the availability at recharging and refuelling stations, including the possibility to reserve. Member States should be able to decide to implement such information measures also in respect of vehicles placed on the market before 18 November 2016.
Amendment 388 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) The market for alternative fuels and in particular for zero emission fuels is still in the early stages of development and technology is evolving fast. This should likely affect the demand for alternative fuels and consequently for alternative fuels infrastructure across the modes. The Commission should therefore, based on an analysis of the latest technological developments and market readiness and taking into consideration the national policy frameworks, review this Regulation by the end of 2026 in particular as regards the targets setting for electric recharging points for HDV as well as targets for infrastructure for alternative fuels for zero- emission vessels and aircraft in waterborne transport and aviation, in order to ensure legal certainty and predictability for the industry.
Amendment 399 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Amendment 411 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Amendment 424 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) - biomethane, biopropane, bioLPG, renewable Dimethyl Ether
Amendment 426 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Amendment 430 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c – introductory part
(c) ‘alternative fossil fuels’ for a transitional phaseuels’:
Amendment 434 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) - RFNBO
Amendment 435 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c b (new)
(c b) - recycled carbon fuels
Amendment 448 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35 a (new)
(35 a) 'payment card' means a payment service that works on the basis of a physical or digital debit or credit card and comprises payment cards embedded in a smartphone application;
Amendment 449 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 35 b (new)
(35 b) 'payment service' means a payment service as defined in Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366;
Amendment 492 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
‘coach terminal’ means a terminal that serves coach passengers.
Amendment 493 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
‘coach parking area’ means anarea reserved for parking coaches.
Amendment 499 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new)
- the deployment of the recharging infrastructure supports multimodal travelling;
Amendment 532 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) along the TEN-T core and comprehensive network, publicly accessible recharging pools dedicated to light-duty vehicles and meeting the following requirements are deployed in each direction of travel with a maximum distance of 60 km in-between them:
Amendment 572 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 584 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) by 31 December 2025, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 142000 kW and include at least onetwo recharging station with an individual power output of at least 35800 kW;
Amendment 587 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) by 31 December 2030, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 35000 kW and include at least twofour recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 351200 kW;
Amendment 596 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) by 31 December 2030, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 142000 kW and include at least onetwo recharging station with an individual power output of at least 35800 kW;
Amendment 599 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) by 1 December 2035, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 35000 kW and include at least twofour recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 351200 kW;
Amendment 609 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) by 31 December 203027, in each safe and secure parking area at least onetwo recharging station dedicated to heavy-duty vehicles with a power output of at least 100 kW is installed;
Amendment 615 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) by 31 December 2025, in each urban node publicly accessible recharging points dedicated to heavy-duty vehicles providing an aggregated power output of at least 61400 kW are deployed, provided by recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 1350 kW;
Amendment 623 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) by 31 December 2030, in each urban node publicly accessible recharging points dedicated to heavy-duty vehicles providing an aggregated power output of at least 123500 kW are deployed, provided by recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 1350 kW.
Amendment 646 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Operators of recharging points shall, at the publicly accessible recharging points operated by them, deployed from the date referred to in Article 24, provide end users with the possibility to recharge their electric vehicle on an ad hoc basis using a payment instrument that is widely used in the Union. To that end:which accepts electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services, at least via payment cards.
Amendment 731 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that a standardised information system on the availability of recharging points and estimated waiting times is available in an easily understandable and precise manner to end users.
Amendment 733 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9 b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that a standardised reservation system is provided allowing end users to book electric recharging infrastructure in advance. Member States should ensure that their reservation systems are compatible and interoperable.
Amendment 752 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
To that end Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2030 publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling stations with a minimum capacity of 2 t/day and equipped with at least a 700 bars dispenser are deployed with a maximum distance of 1500 km in-between them along the TEN-T core and the TEN-T comprehensive network. Liquid hydrogen shall be made available at publicly accessible refuelling stations with a maximum distance of 450 km in-between them.
Amendment 757 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall ensure that by 31 December 2030, at least onetwo publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling station iss are deployed in each urban node. An analysis on the best location shall be carried out for such refuelling stations that shall in particular consider the deployment of such stations in multimodal hubs where also other transport modes could be supplied.
Amendment 759 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall ensure that by 31 December 2030, at least one publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling station is deployed in each urban node. An analysis on the best location shall be carried out for such refuelling stations that shall in particular consider the deployment of such stations in multimodal hubs where also other transport modes could be suppliedurban areas in order to ensure supply for other modes of transport.
Amendment 774 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From the date referred to in Article 24 all operators of publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling stations operated by them shall provide for the possibility for end users to refuel on an ad hoc basis using a payment instrument that is widely used in the Union. To that end, operators of hydrogen refuelling stations shall ensure that all hydrogen refuelling stations operated by them accept electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services, including at least one of the following:at least via payment cards.
Amendment 779 #
2021/0223(COD)
1 a. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that a standardised information system on the availability of recharging points and estimated waiting times is available in an easily understandable and precise manner to end users.
Amendment 780 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that a standardised booking system is provided allowing end users to book hydrogen refuelling infrastructure in advance.
Amendment 798 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure until 1 January 2025 that an appropriatethat a sufficient number of publicly accessible refuelling points for CNG and LNG are put in place, at least along the TEN-T core network, in order to allow CNG and LNG heavy-duty motor vehicles to circulate throughout the Union, where there is demand, unless the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits.
Amendment 957 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) an assessment of the current state and future development of grid capacity, including the needed improvement and resilience measures as well as financing;
Amendment 963 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) policies and measures necessary to ensure that the mandatory targets and objectives referred to in points (b) and (c) of this paragraph are reached accompanied by a detailed assessment of the investments required, socio- economic and cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 972 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point i
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point i
(i) measures necessary to ensure that the deployment and operation of recharging points, including the geographical distribution of bidirectional charging points, contribute to the flexibility of the energy system and to the penetration of renewable electricity into the electric system. In this regard, an analysis should be added including a market development analysis, identification of possible legislative obstacles, technical infrastructure building and a geographical distribution plan for smart and bidirectional charging points;
Amendment 976 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point k
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point k
(k) measures to remove possible obstacles with regards to planning, permitting and procuring of alternative fuels infrastructure. In particular, the final authorisation for a publicly accessible charger being installed takes no longer than 6 months from the date of submission of the request for authorisation. The authorisation procedure should be fully digitalised;
Amendment 1003 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point p
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point p
(p) a deployment plan including targets, key milestones, refuelling points, recharging points and financing needed, for hydrogen or battery electric trains on network segments that will not be electrified.
Amendment 1014 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point p a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point p a (new)
(p a) measures to promote infrastructure for alternative fuels serving multiple modes of transport at the same time.
Amendment 1052 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of input from transmission system operators and distribution system operators, the regulatory authority of a Member States shall assess, at the latest by 1 30 June 2024 and periodically every threewo years thereafter, the potential contribution of bidirectional charging to the penetration of renewable electricity into the electricity system. That assessment shall be made publicly available. On the basis of the results of the assessment, Member States shall take, if necessary, the appropriate measures to adjust the availability and geographical distribution of bidirectional recharging points, in both public and private areas and include them in their progress report referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 1078 #
2021/0223(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new)
(j a) number of refuelling points and recharging points for multimodal use.
Amendment 95 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) While the Union’s renewable energy policy aims to contribute to achieving the Union climate goals, it also contributes to strengthening the Union’s strategic interests, namely technological sovereignty, security of supply, and protection against possible price volatility. The Union's strategic autonomy in the field of energy will ensure that Member States have the ability to guarantee a secure and affordable supply, regardless of exogenous changes such as geopolitical crises.
Amendment 104 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Electromobility will play an essential role in decarbonising the transport sector. To foster the further development of electromobility in all transport modes, Member States should establish a credit mechanism enabling operators of charging points accessible to the public, where technically possible, to contribute, by supplying renewable electricity, towards the fulfilment of the obligation set up by Member States on fuel suppliers. While supporting electricity in transport through such a mechanism, it is important that Member States continue setting a high level of ambition for the decarbonisation of their liquid fuel mix in transport.
Amendment 110 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The Union’s renewable energy policy aims to contribute to achieving the climate change mitigation objectives of the European Union in terms of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In the pursuit of this goal, it is essential to also contribute to wider environmental objectives, and in particular the prevention of biodiversity loss, which is negatively impacted by the indirect land use change associated to the production of certain high-indirect land- use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels. Contributing to these climate and environmental objectives constitutes a deep and longstanding intergenerational concern for Union citizens and the Union legislator. As a consequence, the changes in the way the transport target is calculated should not affect the limits established on how to account toward that target certain fuels produced from food and feed crops on the one hand and high indirect land-use change-risk fuels on the other hand. In addition, in order not to create an incentive to use biofuels and biogas produced from food and feed crops in transport, Member States should continue to be able to choose whether count them or not towards the transport target. If they do not count them, they may reduce the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target accordingly, assuming that food and feed crop-based biofuels save 50% greenhouse gas emissions, which corresponds to the typical values set out in an annex to this Directive for the greenhouse gas emission savings of the most relevant production pathways of food and feed crop-based biofuels as well as the minimum savings threshold applying to most installations producing such biofuelsSustainable biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels that co-generate valuable protein for animal and human consumption, and are deforestation-free, should be a building block of the decarbonisation of transport, within a reasonable limit preventing unwanted negative impacts on the availability of food and feed resources. Member States should be put in an equal footing in their use of these sustainable bio fuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, to reach the higher level of emission savings, under common limit.
Amendment 120 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) To ensure higher environmental effectiveness of the Union sustainability and greenhouse emissions saving criteria for solid biomass fuels in installations producing heating, electricity and cooling, the minimum threshold for the applicability of such criteria should be lowered from the current 20 MW to 510 MW starting in 2027.
Amendment 126 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to reduce the administrative burden for producers of renewable fuels and recycled carbon fuels and for Member States, where voluntary or national schemes have been recognised by the Commission through an implementing act as giving evidence or providing accurate data regarding the compliance with sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria as well as other requirements set in this Directive, Member States should accept the results of the certification issued by such schemes within the scope of the Commission’s recognition. In order to reduce the burden on small installations, Member States should establish a simplified verification mechanism starting 1 January2027 for installations of between 510 and 120MW.
Amendment 148 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1a
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1a
Amendment 178 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point i
Amendment 185 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – point iii
Amendment 193 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 202 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
By 2026 the Commission shall present a report on the impact of the Member States’ support schemes for biomass, including on biodiversity and possible market distortions, and will assess the possibility for further limitations regarding support schemes to forest biomass.;.
Amendment 240 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall endeavour to increase the share of renewable sources in the amount of energy sources used for final energy and non-energy purposes in the industry sector by an indicative average minimum annual increase of 1.1 percentage points by 2030.
Amendment 242 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 244 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Member States shall ensure that the contribution of renewable fuels of non- biological origin used for final energy and non-energy purposes shall be 50 % of the hydrogen used for final energy and non- energy purposes in industry by 2030. For the calculation of that percentage, the following rules shall apply:
Amendment 246 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point a
Article 22a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) For the calculation of the denominator, the energy content of hydrogen for final energy and non-energy purposes shall be taken into account, excluding hydrogen used as intermediate products for the production of conventional transport fuels.
Amendment 247 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) For the calculation of the numerator, the energy content of the renewable fuels of non-biological origin consumed in the industry sector for final energy and non-energy purposes shall be taken into account, excluding renewable fuels of non- biological origin used as intermediate products for the production of conventional transport fuels.
Amendment 279 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For the calculation of a Member State's gross final consumption of energy from renewable sources referred to in Article 7 and of the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target referred to in Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (a), the share of biofuels and bioliquids, as well as of biomass fuels consumed in transport, where produced from food and feed crops, shall be no more than one percentage point higher than the share of such fuels in the final consumption of energy in the transport sector in 2020 in that Member State, with a maximum of 7 % of the final consumption of energy in the transport sector in that Member State.;
Amendment 286 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii – introductory part
(ii) the second, third and fourth subparagraph is replaced by the following:are deleted.
Amendment 287 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 311 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a – point ii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point a
— (a) in the case of solid biomass fuels, in installations producing electricity, heating and cooling with a total rated thermal input equal to or exceeding 510 MW,
Amendment 366 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 30 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
Article 30 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
For installations producing electricity heating and cooling with a total rated thermal input between 510 and 120 MW, starting 1 January 2027, Member States shall establish simplified national verification schemes to ensure the fulfillment of the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions criteria set out in paragraphs (2) to (7) and (10) of Article 29.;
Amendment 376 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Amendment 377 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a – paragraph 1
Article 31a – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall ensure that a Union database is set up to enable the tracing of liquid and gaseous renewable fuels, including the tracing of the feedstocks listed in Annex IX used in their production, and recycled carbon fuels.
Amendment 388 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex V – part c – point 6
Annex V – part c – point 6
6. 6. For the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 1(a), greenhouse gas emissions savings from improved agriculture management, esca, such as shifting to reduced or zero-tillage, storing carbon in soil with biochar, improved crop/rotation, the use of cover crops, including crop residue management, and the use of organic soil improver (e.g. compost, manure fermentation digestate), shall be taken into account only if they do not risk to negatively affect biodiversity. Carbon in biomasses can be converted into biochar through pyrolysis, which can be stored by land application, thereby making it a negative emissions technology. Here, the bonus for the improved agricultural and manure management is returned to the farmer responsible for the negative emissions when sustainability/environmental certificates are issued. Further, solid and verifiable evidence shall be provided that the soil carbon has increased or that it is reasonable to expect to have increased over the period in which the raw materials concerned were cultivated while taking into account the emissions where such practices lead to increased fertiliser and herbicide use37 .; __________________ 37 Measurements of soil carbon can constitute such evidence, e.g. by a first measurement in advance of the cultivation and subsequent ones at regular intervals several years apart. In such a case, before the second measurement is available, increase in soil carbon would be estimated on the basis of representative experiments or soil models. From the second measurement onwards, the measurements would constitute the basis for determining the existence of an increase in soil carbon and its magnitude.
Amendment 396 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
(aa) In part A, the following alinea is inserted: (r) Intermediate and cover crops;
Amendment 118 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Existing mechanisms to address the risk of carbon leakage in sectors or sub- sectors at risk of carbon leakage are the transitional free allocation of EU ETS allowances and financial measures to compensate for indirect emission costs incurred from GHG emission costs passed on in electricity prices respectively laid down in Articles 10a(6) and 10b of Directive 2003/87/EC. However, free allocation under the EU ETS weakens the price signal that the system provides for the installations receiving it compared to full auctioning and thus affects the incentives for investment into further abatement of emissions.
Amendment 123 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The CBAM seeks to gradually replace these existing mechanisms by addressing the risk of carbon leakage in a different way, namely by ensuring equivalent carbon pricing for imports and domestic products. To ensure a gradual transition from the current system and by ensuring that EU export products are not replaced by more carbon-intensive products, which would undermine the objective of free allowances to the CBAM,ducing global emissions. the CBAM should be progressively phased in while free allowances in sectors covered by the CBAM are phased outgradually phased out after an assessment by the Commission has proven that the regulation is effective in protection from the risk of carbon leakage for both imports and exports. The gradual phase-out of free allowance is essential to ensure a just transition for energy- intensive sectors. The combined and transitional application of EU ETS allowances allocated free of charge and of the CBAM should in no case result in more favourable treatment for Union goods compared to goods imported into the customs territory of the Union.
Amendment 126 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The CBAM seeks to replace these existing mechanisms by addressing the risk of carbon leakage in a different way, namely by ensuring equivalent carbon pricing for imports and domestic products. To ensure a gradual transition from the current system of free allowances to the CBAM, the CBAM should be progressively phased in while free allowances in sectors covered by the CBAM are phased out until they are completely eliminated. The combined and transitional application of EU ETS allowances allocated free of charge and of the CBAM should in no case result in more favourable treatment for Union goods compared to goods imported into the customs territory of the Union and should remain WTO-compliant. The transition period should provide regulatory certainty to resource- and energy-intensive industries and a predictable timeline for all stakeholders. The Commission should also review the financial measures to compensate for indirect emission costs with a view to phasing them out as CBAM indirect emissions are phased in. The Commission should ensure this phase out design guarantees a level playing field for the EU industry and takes into account EU electricity market specificities.
Amendment 130 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) While the surrendering of CBAM certificates for EU imports addresses the risk of carbon leakage on the EU market, it is essential to avoid also the risk that EU exports on global markets are replaced by more carbon intensive goods or by goods that are not subject to equivalent climate policy and carbon costs. To this purpose if the assessment of the effectiveness of the CBAM in tackling carbon leakage both on EU and global markets is positive, after the test period2026-2028, in 2029 the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and Council accompanied with a legislative proposal to address the carbon leakage risk on export markets .If the report concludes that the surrendering of CBAM certificates by importers is effective in addressing the carbon leakage risk on the EU market and that the free allocation rules related to EU domestic sales should be amended, the legislative proposal shall ensure the maintenance of free allocation related to EU exports and provide the calculation methodology for determining this allocation.
Amendment 133 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The phasing-out of free allowances should be accompanied by the introduction of support measures for exports that would remain WTO- compliant and consistent with the EU’s environmental objectives. These measures should include partial export rebates based on the existing benchmark logic of most-carbon-efficient producers, not refunding more than the current level of free allowances, in order to maintain strong decarbonisation incentives while ensuring a level playing field for EU exports.
Amendment 169 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In order not to disproportionately hinder existing trade flows by CBAM obligations, we must do the utmost to reduce unnecessary administrative burden, for instance by recognition of third countries’ emission monitoring systems.
Amendment 197 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) However, aluminium products should be included in the CBAM as they are highly exposed to carbon leakage. Moreover, in several industrial applications they are in direct competition with steel products because of characteristics closely resembling those of steel products. Inclusion of aluminium is also relevant as the scope of the CBAM may be extended talso cover alsos indirect emissions in the future.
Amendment 215 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
Recital 52
(52) The Commission should evaluate the application of this Regulation before the endstart of the transitional periodremoval of free allowances in ETS and report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report of the Commission should in particular focus on possibilities to enhance climate actions towards the objective of a climate neutral Union by 2050. The Commission should, as part of that evaluation, initiate collection of information necessary to possibly extend the scope to indirect emissions, as well as to other goods and services at risk of carbon leakage, and to develop methods of calculating embedded emissions based on the environmental footprint methods47 . With regard to indirect emissions, the evaluation should take into account the exposure of EU producers to carbon costs passed on in electricity prices due to the functioning of the EU energy market. _________________ 47 Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 124, 4.5.2013, p. 1).
Amendment 225 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) The Commission should strive to engage in an even handed manner and in line with the international obligations of the EU, with the third countries whose trade to the EU is affected by this Regulation, to explore possibilities for dialogue and cooperation with regard to the implementation of specific elements of the Mechanism set out this Regulation and related implementing acts. It should also explore possibilities for concluding agreements to take into account their carbon pricing mechanism, provided that they deliver equivalent GHG emissions reductions and carbon costs constraints.
Amendment 242 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61 a (new)
Recital 61 a (new)
(61a) It is crucial that a level playing field in internationally operating sectors such as aviation and the maritime industry is ensured. For aviation, this concerns routes with a high share of connecting passengers to destinations outside the EEA. For the maritime sector, ships hulls and other shipbuilding equipment built outside the Union is sensitive to a potential competitive disadvantage. Both sector’s specificities will need to be considered. Therefore, the Commission should explore mechanisms to mitigate potential competitive distortion between feeder flights from EU and non- EU hubs as well as between EU and third country shipbuilding players.
Amendment 253 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The mechanism will progressively become an alternative to the mechanisms established under Directive 2003/87/EC to prevent the risk of carbon leakage, notably the allocation of allowances free of charge in accordance with Article 10a of that Directive. The mechanism shall first prove to be effective to prevent the risk of carbon leakage both for imports into or exports from the customs territory of the Union, without prejudice to maintaining EU ETS allowances free of charge at benchmark level until a test period with actual surrendering obligation by declarants running until 2030.
Amendment 255 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The mechanism will progressively become an alternative to the mechanisms established under Directive 2003/87/EC to prevent the risk of carbon leakage, notably the allocation of allowances free of charge and the financial measures to compensate for indirect emission costs in accordance with Article 10a and 10b of that Directive.
Amendment 272 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘embedded emissions’ mean direct emissions released during the production of goods, calculated pursuant to the methods set out in Annex III, and indirect emissions pursuant to the methods to be defined by the Commission in accordance with Article 7(6);
Amendment 302 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The authorised declarant shall keep records of the documentation, certified by an independent person, verifier accredited pursuant to Article 18 and in line with the competences established in Article 8(1) concerning the verification of embedded emissions. The accredited verifier is required to demonstrate that the declared embedded emissions were subject to a carbon price in the country of origin of the goods and keep evidence of the proof of the actual payment for that carbon price which should not have been subject to an export rebate or any other form of compensation on exportation.
Amendment 308 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, upon request by a register the information on operators of an installations located in a third country, register the information on that operator and on itsies and on those installation in a central database referred to in Article 14(4).
Amendment 317 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. The operator may, at any timefter 10 years, ask to be deregistered from the database.
Amendment 467 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Practices of circumvention include situations where a change in the pattern of trade in relation to goods included in the scope of this Regulation, whether slightly modified or not, stems from a practice, process or work has insufficient due cause or economic justification other than avoiding obligations as laid down in this Regulation and consist in replacing those goods with slightly modified products, which are not included in the list of goods in Annex I but belong to a sector included in the scope of this Regulation. , or undermining their effects, including on overall GHG emissions and on prices of the like products.
Amendment 472 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The practice, process or work referred to in the first subparagraph include, inter alia: (a) the slight modification of the product concerned to make it fall under customs codes which are normally not subject to the obligations of this Regulation, provided that the modification does not alter its essential characteristics; (b) false declarations as to the identity of the producer of the product concerned or of the nature of the product concerned or the production process involved in making it; (c) the consignment of the product concerned via third countries to which no or more favourable obligations apply; (d) the reorganisation by exporters or producers of their patterns and channels of sales in order to eventually avoid obligations as laid down in this Regulation, or undermine their effects, including on overall GHG emissions and on prices of the like products, for instance via practices of resource shuffling. For the purposes of this sub-point, resource shuffling shall be defined as any practice, process or work that that have insufficient due cause or economic justification other than avoiding obligations as laid down in this Regulation, or undermining their effects, without delivering environmental benefits on global GHG emissions; (e) in the circumstances indicated in paragraph 2, the assembly of parts by an assembly operation in the Union or a third country; (f) Any other measure to eventually avoid 6 or evade obligations as laid down in this Regulation, or undermine their effects, including on overall GHG.
Amendment 476 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. A Member State or any party affected or benefitted by the situations described in paragraph 2 may notify the Commission if it is confronted, over a two- month period compared with the same period in the preceding year with a significant decrease in the volume of imporFollowing a complaint from an interested party or on its own initiative, the Commission may decide, following an investigation, to extend goods included in the scope ofobligations laid down in this Rregulation and an increase of volume of imports of slightly modified products, which are not included in the list of goods in Annex I. The Commission shall continually monitor any significant change of pattern of trade of goods and slightly modified products at Union level, in whatever way is necessary to prevent future circumvention of the Mechanism, when circumvention of the measures in force is taking place.
Amendment 480 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4
Article 27 – paragraph 4
4. The notificatDecisions referred to in the third paragraph 3 shall state the reasons on which it is based and shall include relevant data and statistics regarding the goods and products referred to in paragraph 2be subject to the appeal procedure as set out in Article 30.
Amendment 483 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commission, taking into account the relevant data, reports and statistics, incluInvestigations shall be initiated pursuant to this Article on the initiative of the Commission or at the request of a Member State or of any interested party on the basis of sufficient evidence regarding wthen provided by the customs authorities of Member States, has sufficient reasons to believe that the circumstances referred to in paragraph 3 are occurring in one or more Member States, it is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to supplement the scope of this Regulation in ord factors set out in the second paragraph. Initiations shall be made by means of a Commission regulation which shall also instruct customs authorities of Member States to subject imports to registration. The Commission shall provide information to the Member States once an interested party or a Member State has submitted a request justifying the initiation of an investigation and the Commission has completed its analysis thereof, or where to include slightly modified products for anti-circumvention purposes. he Commission has itself determined that there is a need to initiate an investigation.
Amendment 490 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Investigations shall be carried out by the Commission. The Commission may be assisted by customs authorities and the investigation shall be concluded in due time.
Amendment 492 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. The Commission Decision finding circumvention shall impose a penalty pursuant to article 26 on an Authorised Declarant involved in the circumvention and, if appropriate, the operator of the installation located in the third country that is linked to the Authorised Declarant. Where appropriate, the penalty shall also entail the withdrawal of import authorisation and be extended to the operator.
Amendment 504 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall collect the information necessary with a view to extending the scope of this Regulation to indirect emissions and goods other, transportation services such as air transport, manufacturing of transport equipment such as ship hulls and floating structures, and other goods than those listed in Annex I, and develop methods of calculating embedded emissions based on environmental footprint methods.
Amendment 508 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall collect the, in consultation with the relevant stakeholders, the information necessary information necessary with a view to extending the scope of this Regulation to indirect emissions and goods other than those listed in Annex I, and develop methods of calculating embedded emissions based on environmental footprint methods.
Amendment 511 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Before the end of the transitional period, the Commission shall present a report, based on the information collected under paragraph 1, to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall contain, in particular, the assessment of the possibilities to further extend the scope of embedded emissions to indirect emissions and to other goods at risk of carbon leakage than those already covered by this Regulation, as well as an assessment of the governance system. It shall also contain the assessment of the possibility to further extend the scope to embedded emissions of transportation services as well asf the assessment shows that other sectors need to be included in the scope of this Regulation to goods further down the value chain and transportation services that may be subject to the risk of carbon leakage in the future, the report by the Commission shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal to extend the scope to these sectors.
Amendment 513 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Before the endstart of the transitional periodremoval of free allowances under ETS, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall contain, in particular, and assess if the conditions are in place for the effective implementation of a CBAM before phasing our free allocations. The report shall contain, in addition, in-depth assessment, developed in close cooperation with the industrial sectors, of the rules to be applied in the testing period established pursuing to article 30bis and the assessment of the possibilities to further extend the scope of embedded emissions to indirect emissions and to other goods at risk of carbon leakage than those already covered by this Regulation, as well as an assessment of the governance system. It shall also contain the assessment of the possibility to further extend the scope to embedded emissions of transportation services as well as to goods further down the value chain and services that may be subject to the risk of carbon leakage in the future.
Amendment 519 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 69 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure a smooth implementation of this Directive, the minimum levels of taxation for motor fuels used for intra-EU non-business and non- pleasure flights would be reached over a transitional period of ten years, whereas sustainable alternative fuels and electricity would be subject to a zero minimum rate for ten years. Energy products and electricity used for intra-EU business aviation and pleasure flights should be subject to the standard levels of taxation applicable to motor fuels and electricity in the Member States. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 77 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Fuel used for waterborne navigation, including fishing, should also be taxed, and the Member States party to international agreements providing for the exemption of that fuel, have to, by the date of the application of this Directive, ensure they eliminate the incompatibilities. It is necessary to allow for a different level of taxation to be applied to the use of energy products and electricity for intra-EU waterborne regular service navigation, fishing and freight transport and their respective at berth activities. Considering the specificity of those uses, the minimum levels of taxation should be lower than the ones applicable to general motor fuel use. In order to provide an incentive to the use of sustainable alternative fuels and electricity, such fuels and electricity should be exempted from taxation for ten years. Energy products and electricity used for the remaining intra-EU waterborne navigation should be subject to the standard levels of taxation applicable to motor fuels and electricity in the Member States. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 94 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) It is necessary to ensure that clear taxation rules for energy products and electricity continue to contribute to the smooth functioning of the internal market while at the same time tackling the climate and environmental-related challenges in the context of the Communication from the Commission ‘The European Green Deal’28 . Energy taxation can contribute to the ambition of at least 55 % reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990, as well as to the objective of zero pollution through the implementation of the polluter-pays principle, by ensuring that the taxation of motor fuels, heating fuels and electricity better reflects the impact they have on the environment and on healthnew Union energy targets for 2030. However, it remains essential that the Union climate policy and energy taxation are regarded as two different aspects. Thus, seeing the Union energy taxation as a tool to incentivise climate-neural policy developments. The contribution of energy taxation to those objectives has been endorsed by the Council Conclusions on the EU energy taxation framework29 . _________________ 28 COM(2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019. 29 14861/19 of 5 December 2019.
Amendment 102 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Environmental taxation can be a cost-effective mean for Member States to achieve the targeted reductions of greenhouse gasses. The proper functioning of the internal market requires common rules on that taxation. To that end, this Directive should foster energy efficiency in a technology neutral manner, while CO2price signals should be given by the EU Emissions Trading System.
Amendment 112 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table A of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033.. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 116 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table B of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033.permanently. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 119 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table C of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033.permanently. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 119 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) As a general principle, Member States should apply to energy products and electricity levels of taxation not less than the minimum levels of taxation as set out by the Directive in order to generate a level playing field between Member States as well as competitiveness. Member States should be permitted to comply with the Union minimum taxation levels by taking into account the total charge levied in respect of all indirect taxes which they have chosen to apply (excluding VAT).
Amendment 127 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum levels of taxation referred to in the first subparagraph shall start from zero and increase each year by one tenth of the final minimum rates, set out in Tables A and D of Annex I, over a transitional period of ten years. A minimum rate of zero shall apply to sustainable biofuels and biogas, low-carbon fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advanced sustainable biofuels and biogas, and electricity over that transitional period of ten years.. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 127 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17 a) Energy taxation should only apply to final consumption, and neither energy use within the energy value chain nor any form of conversion or storage should be taxed. That principle should apply to all forms of energy-conversion processes and to energy products and electricity used for the transport and storage of energy products and electricity. In that context, conversion should be understood as the process of converting one form of energy into another, such as using natural gas to generate electricity or producing hydrogen from electricity or natural gas.
Amendment 131 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The need to pursue the objectives of the Directive requires that no distinction is made between commercial andMember States may need to differentiate between commercial and non- commercial diesel. Member States should have the option to use that possibility to reduce the gap between the taxation of non-commercial diegas oil useld as well aspropellant and petrol. It should be possible to treat business use and non-business use for heating fuels and electricity. of energy products and electricity differently for tax purposes.
Amendment 140 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20 a (new)
Recital 20 a (new)
(20 a) In order to ensure connectivity, air and water navigation remain important sectors. However, in order to remain competitive internationally and create a level playing field, an international approach to energy taxation should be considered.
Amendment 143 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 146 #
2021/0213(CNS)
(22) In order to ensure a smooth implementation of this Directive, the minimum levels of taxation for motor fuels used for intra-EU non-business and non- pleasure flights would be reached over a transitional period of ten years, whereas sustainable alternative fuels and electricity would be subject to a zero minimum rate for ten years. Energy products and electricity used for intra-EU business aviation and pleasure flights should be subject to the standard levels of taxation applicable to motor fuels and electricity in the Member States.
Amendment 155 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Fuel used for waterborne navigation, including fishing, should also be taxed, and the Member States party to international agreements providing for the exemption of that fuel, have to, by the date of the application of this Directive, ensure they eliminate the incompatibilities. It is necessary to allow for a different level of taxation to be applied to the use of energy products and electricity for intra-EU waterborne regular service navigation, fishing and freight transport and their respective at berth activities. Considering the specificity of those uses, the minimum levels of taxation should be lower than the ones applicable to general motor fuel use. In order to provide an incentive to the use of sustainable alternative fuels and electricity, such fuels and electricity should be exempted from taxation for ten years. Energy products and electricity used for the remaining intra- EU waterborne navigation should be subject to the standard levels of taxation applicable to motor fuels and electricity in the Member States.
Amendment 157 #
2021/0213(CNS)
(23 a) In line with the proposal for a Regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and the proposal for a Regulation on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, this Directive should promote the cost-efficient deployment of installations and the use of shore-side electricity by providing a permanent tax exemption to shore-side electricity, thereby setting the right incentives.
Amendment 158 #
2021/0213(CNS)
5. Member States mayshall apply under fiscal control total or partial exemptions to electricity directly supplied to vessels berthed in ports. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 162 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. The revenues related to inland waterway transport shall be used to set up a dedicated EU inland waterway fund. The eligible projects and investments shall focus on ship retrofitting and renewal in order to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investments in innovative and energy-saving technologies as well as port infrastructure, such as the deployment of alternative fuels, supporting the decarbonisation of the sector.
Amendment 171 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) In particular, highly efficient combined heat and power generation and, in order to promote the use of alternative energy sources, renewable forms of energy may qualify for preferential treatment. It is desirable to establish a Union framework to allow Member States to exempt or reduce excise duties so as to promote biofuels, thereby contributing to the better functioning of the internal market and affording Member States and economic operators a sufficient degree of legal certainty. Distortions of competition should be limited and the incentive of a reduction in the basic costs for producers and distributors of biofuels should be maintained through, inter alia, the adjustments by Member States taking into account changes in raw material prices.
Amendment 173 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Targeted exemptions or reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to incentivise the achievement of environmental protection objectives and, the improvements in energy efficiency and the international competitiveness of the Union productive sector.
Amendment 178 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Targeted exemptions or reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to tackle the social impact of energy taxes. An exemption from taxation may temporarily prove necessary to protect vulnerable households recognised as lower and middle income by Member States.
Amendment 179 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) TargetedCertain exemptions or reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to tackle the social imp; notably because of the lactk of energy taxes. An exemption from taxation may temporarily prove necessary to protect vulnerable householda stronger harmonisation at the Union level, because of the risks of a loss of international competitiveness or because of social or environmental considerations.
Amendment 183 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28 a) The implementation of this Directive could have socio-economic consequences as well as a diverse impact on income classes and Member States. In this regard, a Social Monitor should be established by this Directive to assess the implementation of the Directive and its impact in the different Member States, regions and income classes. The Social Monitor would assign reporting obligations to both the Commission and Member States. The Commission should provide a holistic overview regarding the evolution of energy prices as well as technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers. Member States should describe the social measures taken to ease the potential socio-economic consequences of the implementation of this Directive. Member States might as well put a special emphasis on the state of technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers through complementary assessment, and the Commission should take into account assessments by Member States that demonstrate that cleaner alternatives are not readily available on the market and are not expected to be available in the short term. According to the assessments of the Social Monitor, if no significant progress is made to mitigate socio- economic impacts on lower and middle income households, Member States could prolong the transition period for households recognised as lower and middle income ones by Member States.
Amendment 203 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o
Amendment 212 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – point b
b) ‘low-carbon fuels’ shall mean low- carbon hydrogenfossil-based hydrogen with carbon capture and synthetic gaseous and liquid fuels the energy content of which is derived from fossil-based hydrogen with carbon capture low-carbon hydrogen, as well as any fossil-based fuels, which meet the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which a specific economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation according to Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council436 and Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) […]/[…]37 44. ‘Recycled Carbon Fuels’, as defined by Article 2(35) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, shall be included in this category. _________________ 36 Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13) 37 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) […]/[...] supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives, C/2021/2800 final (OJ […], p.[…]).
Amendment 215 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – paragraph 1
An energy product has a dual use when it is used both as heating fuel and for purposes other than as motor fuel and heating fuel. The use of energy products for chemical reduction and in electrolytic, mineralogical and metallurgical processes, including various hydrogen production methods, such as methane pyrolysis or carbon capture, storage and utilisation, when energy products are used directly in or to provide a direct energy input to the process, or their consumption is connected to the process, shall be regarded as dual use,
Amendment 219 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
— electricity used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction and in electrolytic, mineralogical and metallurgical processes, when electricity is used directly in or to provide a direct energy input to the process, or its consumption is connected to the process,
Amendment 226 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that where equalProvided that they respect the minimum levels of taxation apre laid down in Annex I in relation to a given use, equal levels of taxation are fixed for products put to that use. Member States shall also replicate at any time the ranking of minimum levels of taxation as laid down in Annex I in relation to difscribed by this Directive and that they are compatible with Community law, differentiated rates of taxation may be applied by Member States, under fiscal control, in the following cases: – between business and non-business use, for energy products and electricity referrent products for each given used to in Articles 9 and 10.
Amendment 232 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 233 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. TWhe minimum levels of taxation laid down in this Directive shall be adapted every year starting from 1 January 2024 to take account of the changes in the harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat. The minimum levels shall be adapted automatically, by increasing or decreasing the base amount in euro by the percentage change in thare a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Annex I, the Commission shall assess the need to prolong the transitional period. The Commission shall therefore keep the minimum levels of taxation as laid down in this Directive under review in line with Article 31.In its assessment the Commission shall give particular consideration to the technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers, as well as taking into account assessments from Member States that demonstrate that cleaner alternatives are not readily available on the market iandex over the pr are not expecteding calendar year to be available in the short term.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The minimum levels of taxation laid down in this Directive shall be adapted every year starting from 1 January 2024 to take account of the changes shall be adapted , on the basis of transparent and holistic assessment taking the harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat. The minimum levels shall be adapted automaticallyrisk of loss of international competitiveness fully into account, by increasing or decreasing the base amount in euro by the percentage change in that index over the preceding calendar year.
Amendment 239 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table A of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply. until 1 January 2033.
Amendment 245 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table B of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033permanently.
Amendment 250 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table C of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033permanently.
Amendment 256 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Without prejudice to other Union provisions, Member States may apply under fiscal control exemptions or reductions in the level of taxation to energy products and electricity used for high-efficiency cogeneration.´
Amendment 265 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum levels of taxation referred to in the first subparagraph shall start from zero and increase each year by one tenth of the final minimum rates, set out in Tables A and D of Annex I, over a transitional period of ten years. A minimum rate of zero shall apply to sustainable biofuels and biogas, low-carbon fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advanced sustainable biofuels and biogas, and electricity over that transitional period of ten years.
Amendment 266 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum levels of taxation referred to in the first subparagraph shall start from zero and increase each year by one tenth of the final minimum rates, set out in Tables A and D of Annex I, over a transitional period of ten years. A minimum rate of zero shall apply to sustainable biofuels and biogas, low-carbon fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advanced sustainable biofuels and biogas, and electricity over that transitional period of ten years.
Amendment 274 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Energy products supplied for use as fuel to aircrafts and electricity used directly for charging electric aircrafts, for the purposes of intra-EU air navigation of cargo-only flights shall be exempted for all cases when they are covered by existing aviation ETS.
Amendment 289 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 296 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. Member States mayshall apply under fiscal control total or partial exemptions to electricity directly supplied to vessels berthed in ports.
Amendment 298 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The revenues related to inland waterway transport shall be used to set up a dedicated EU inland waterway fund. The eligible projects and investments shall focus on ship retrofitting and renewal in order to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investments in innovative and energy-saving technologies as well as port infrastructure, such as the deployment of alternative fuels, supporting the decarbonisation of the sector.
Amendment 308 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) electricity and electricity generated by renewable hydrogene:
Amendment 314 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 5 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 5 a (new)
- generated from renewable gases and renewable fuels of non-biological origin;
Amendment 316 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States may also exempt energy products and electricity used for high- efficiency cogeneration.
Amendment 321 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advancedlow-carbon fuels, sustainable biofuels, bioliquids, biogas and advanced- sustainable products falling within CN codes 4401 and 4402;
Amendment 325 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) energy products and electricity used for agricultural, horticultural or aqua cultural works and forestry.
Amendment 326 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) energy products supplied for use as fuel for commercial fishing activity and electricity produced on board a fishing vessel.
Amendment 327 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(e c) renewable hydrogen
Amendment 331 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) reductions in the level of taxation, which shall not go below the minima as set out in Table C and D of Annex I, to energy products and electricity used for combined heat and power generation, without prejudice to Article 13;
Amendment 340 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) reductions in the level of taxation, which shall not go below the minima as set out in Table C and D of Annex I, to energy products used as heating fuel and electricity if used by households and/or by organisations recognised as charitable by the Member State concerned. In the case of such charitable organisations, Member States shall confine the reduction to use for the purpose of non-business activities. Where mixed use takes place, taxation shall apply in proportion to each type of use. If a use is insignificant, it may be treated as nil. For the purposes of point (c), the minimum levels of taxation as set out in Tables C and D of Annex I shall start from zero and increase over a transitional period of ten years by one tenth of the final minimum rates in each year. For the purposes of point (c), energy products and electricity used by households recognised as lower-and middle-income by Member States shall be exempt for a maximum period of ten years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 341 #
2021/0213(CNS)
For the purposes of point (c), energy products and electricity used by households recognised as vulnerable may be exempt for a maximum period of ten years after the entry into force of this Directive. For the purposes of this paragraph, ‘vulnerable households’ shall mean households significantly affected by the impacts of this Directive which, for the purpose of this Directive, means that they are below the ‘at risk of poverty’” threshold, defined as 60% of the national median equivalised disposable income. Member States shall be free to decide on the definition of ‘vulnerable households’.
Amendment 366 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Reporting obligations of the Commission - Social monitor By … [two years after the date of entry into force of this Directive] and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall adopt and make publicly available a report providing detailed assessments of the situation of energy prices in Member States and on the EU market and of the effects of this Directive thereon. That Report shall include all relevant facts and figures covering energy prices developments, as well as an assessment of the effects of the implementation of this Directive on those prices, with special emphasis on households living in the condition of energy poverty as defined in this Directive. The Commission shall in this respect take into consideration the different starting positions of Member States and assess possible extensions of the transitional period and exemptions. This shall specifically apply to justified cases related to households living in the condition of energy poverty to prevent inadequate price jumps that may occur after the end of the transitional period. The Commission in cooperation with Member States shall use the criteria set out in this Directive to identify and report on the number of households that are living in energy poverty.
Amendment 377 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Every five years and for the first time five years after 1 January 2023, the Commission shall submit to the Council and the European Parliament a report on the application of this Directive.
Amendment 381 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Every five years and for the first time five years after 1 January 2023, the Commission shall submit to the Council and to the European Parliament a report on the application of this Directive.
Amendment 385 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 2
The report by the Commission shall, inter alia, examine the minimum levels of taxation, the impact of innovation and technological developments, in particular as regards energy efficiency, the use of electricity in transport, the overall competitiveness of our industries, and the justification for the exemptions, reductions and differentiations laid down in this Directive. The report shall take into account the proper functioning of the internal market, environmental and social considerations, the real value of the minimum levels of taxation and the relevant wider objectives of the Treaties.
Amendment 391 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Amendment 393 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table A – row 16 a (new)
Annex I – table A – row 16 a (new)
Amendment 399 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table B – row 16 a (new)
Annex I – table B – row 16 a (new)
Amendment 405 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Amendment 406 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table C – rows 8 and 9
Annex I – table C – rows 8 and 9
Amendment 407 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table C – rows 8, 9 and 9 a (new)
Annex I – table C – rows 8, 9 and 9 a (new)
Amendment 408 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table C – row 19 a (new)
Annex I – table C – row 19 a (new)
Amendment 49 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Those amendments have differing economic and social impacts on the different sectors of the economy, on the citizens, and the Member States. In particular, the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council31 should provide an additional economic incentive to invest into the reduction of fossil fuel consumption and thereby accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. CombinedTo maintain a high level of investment to ensure the success of the ecological transition the most vulnerable households and micro-enterprises requires protection in accordance with other measures, this should, in the medium to long term, reduce the costs for buildings and road transport, and provide new opportunities for job creation and investment. _________________ 31Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32) increased instability of energy and commodity prices and other costs of transition related adjustments and resource depletion.
Amendment 57 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The increase in the price for fossil fuels maywill disproportionally affect vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users who already spend a larger part of their incomes on energy and transport, who, in certain regionsfurther worsening pre-existing inequalities. These households and micro-enterprises, for the most part, do not have access to other alternative, affordable mobility and transport solutions and who may lack the financial capacity to invest into the reduction of fossil fuel consumption, especially in rural, insular, outermost regions, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas, in less developed regions or territories, including less developed peri-urban areas. They are, moreover, often dependent on fossil fuels, without having the financial capacity to invest in low- and/or zero emission means of transport.
Amendment 73 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) This is even more relevant in view of the existing levels of energy poverty. Energy poverty is a situation in which households are unable to access essential energy services such as cooling, as temperatures rise, and heating. About 34 million Europeans reported an inability to keep their homes adequately warm in 2018, and 6.9% of the Union population have said that they cannot afford to heat their home sufficiently in a 2019 EU-wide survey32 . Overall, the Energy Poverty Observatory estimates that more than 50 million households in the European Union experience energy poverty. Energy poverty is therefore a major challenge for the Union. While social tariffs or direct income support can provides immediate relief to households facing energy poverty, only targeted structural measures, in particular energy renovations, can provide lasting solutions. _________________ 32 Data from 2018. Eurostat, SILC [ilc_mdes01]).
Amendment 74 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Mobility poverty has been underexposed and no clear Union-level or national definitions are available. However, the problem is becoming more pressing to address as a result of the increasing phase-out requirements for combustion engine vehicles, high fuel prices, or high dependencies on transport availability, accessibility and costs for daily mobility needs especially in rural, insular, outermost regions, mountainous, remote or less accessible areas or in less developed regions or territories, including less developed peri-urban area, caused by one or a combination of factors, such as high fuel expenditures, high costs for the replacement of internal combustion engine vehicles with low and/or zero- emission vehicles, or lack of availability of adequate, affordable public or alternative modes of transport;
Amendment 80 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) A Social Climate Fund (‘the Fund’) should therefore be established to provide funds to the Member States to support their policies to address the social impacts of the emissions trading for buildings and road transport on vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises and, vulnerable transport users and workers in affected sectors. This should be achieved notably through temporary income support and measures and investments intended to reduce reliance on fossil fuels through increased energy efficiency of buildings, decarbonisation of heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy from renewable sources, and granting improved access to zero- and low-emission mobility and transport including attractive and safe active mobility, and public transport to the benefit of vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises and vulnerable transport users and to update the workers qualification in affected sectors.
Amendment 92 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) For that purpose, each Member State should submit to the Commission a Social Climate Plan (‘the Plan’). Those Plans should pursue two objectives. Firstly, they should provide vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises and, vulnerable transport users and businesses in affected sectors the necessary resources to finance and carry out investments in energy efficiency, decarbonisation of heating and cooling, in zero- and low-emission vehicles and mobility, including attractive and safe active mobility, public transport and upskilling and reskilling of employees. Secondly, they should mitigate the impact of the increase in the cost of fossil fuels on the most vulnerable and thereby prevent energy and transportmobility poverty during the transition period until such investments have been implemented. The Plans should have an investment component promoting the long-term solution of reduce fossil fuels reliance and could envisage other measures, including temporary direct income support to mitigate adverse income effects in the shorter term.
Amendment 98 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) Targeted reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to tackle the social impact of energy taxes. An exemption from taxation may temporarily prove necessary to protect vulnerable households.
Amendment 99 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 b (new)
Recital 11 b (new)
(11 b) Further fiscal or stimulus measures may also be necessary in order to support vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises or vulnerable transport users.
Amendment 100 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 c (new)
Recital 11 c (new)
(11 c) It is important to set a definition of vulnerable households, which takes into account a sufficient set of variables which point to the fact that a household could be vulnerable for a number of economic, social and geographical reasons. Therefore, when defining a vulnerable household, it is necessary to view this definition as setting a spectrum rather than a binary form of definitions.
Amendment 103 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Ensuring that the measures and investments are particularly targeted towards energy poor or vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises and, vulnerable transport users and workers in affected sectors is key for a just transition towards climate neutrality. Support measures to promote reductions in greenhouse gas emissions should help Member States to address the social impacts arising from the emissions trading for the sectors of buildings and road transport.
Amendment 110 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Pending the impact of those investments on reducing costs and emissions, well targeted direct income support for the most vulnerable would help the just transition. Such support should be understood to be a temporary measure accompanying the decarbonisation of the housing and transport sectors. It would not be permanent as it does not address the root causes of energy and transportmobility poverty. Such support shcould only concern direct impacts of the inclusion of building and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, not electricity or heating costs related to the inclusion of power and heat production in the scope of that Directive. Eligibility for such direct income support should be limited in timbe considered as a means of enabling the most vulnerable households, microenterprises and businesses to meet their essential socio- economic needs. Eligibility for such direct income support should be limited in time, but harmonised with the phasing in of the relevant directives and regulations affecting vulnerable actors in the Fit for 55 package.
Amendment 142 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Pending the impact of those investments on reducing costs and emissions, well targeted direct income support for the most vulnerable would help the just transition. Such support should be understood to be a temporary measure accompanying the decarbonisation of the housing and transport sectors. It would not be permanent as it does not address the root causes of energy and transport poverty. Such support shcould only concern direct impacts of the inclusion of building and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, not electricity or heating costs related to the inclusion of power and heat production in the scope of that Directive. Eligibility for such direct income support should be limited in timbe considered as a means of enabling the most vulnerable households, microenterprises and businesses to meet their essential socio-economic needs. Eligibility for such direct income support should be limited in time, but harmonised with the phasing in of the relevant directives and regulations affecting vulnerable actors in the Fit for 55 package.
Amendment 142 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
The measures and investments supported by the Fund shall benefit vulnerable households, vulnerable small and micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users and workers in sectors, which are vulnerable and particularly affected by the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, especially households in energy poverty and citizens without public transport alternative to individual cars (in remote and rural areas).
Amendment 149 #
2021/0206(COD)
The general objective of the Fund is to contribute to the transition towards climate neutrality by addressinglimiting as much as possible the social impacts of the transition and the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC. The specific objective of the Fund is to support vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users through temporary direct income support and through measures and investments intended to increase energy efficiency of buildings, decarbonisation of heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy from renewable sources, and granting improved access to zero- and low-emission mobility and transport, and helping to ensure workers are sufficiently supported in order to re-skill or upskill their qualifications.
Amendment 156 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The financial envelope of the Fund should, in principle, be commensurate to amounts corresponding to 25% of the expected revenues from the inclusion of buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC in the period 2026-2032. Pursuant to Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/205341 , Member States should make those revenues available to the Union budget as own resources. Member States are to finance 50%a significant share of the total costs of their Plan themselves corresponding to at a maximum 50% for targeted structural measures and investments. By way of derogation, it should be possible for the national co-financing share for targeted structural measures and investments to be limited to 40% for Member States that are eligible for a top-up from the EIB's Modernisation Fund. For this purpose, as well as for investment and measures to accelerate and alleviate the required transition for citizens negatively affected, Member States should inter alia use their expected revenues from emissions trading for buildings and road transport under Directive 2003/87/EC for that purpose. _________________ 41 Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom (OJ L 424, 15.12.2020, p. 1).
Amendment 163 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) ‘mobility poverty’ means households that have a disproportionate share of mobility expenditure to their disposable income or a limited availability of affordable public or alternative modes of transport required to meet essential socio-economic needs, with a particular focus on households in rural, insular, outermost regions, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas or less developed regions or territories, including less developed (peri-)urban areas, caused by one or a combination of factors: high fuel prices, the phase-out of internal combustion engine vehicles, high costs for the replacement of internal combustion engine vehicles with zero-emission vehicles, high-costs or lack of availability of adequate, affordable public or alternative modes of transport;
Amendment 175 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
Recital 25 a (new)
(25 a) To ensure that support under the Plan can be effectively implemented from the initial years of the entry into force of the Social Climate Fund, it should be possible for an amount of up to 13% of the financial contribution of Member States to be paid in the form of pre- financing.
Amendment 175 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘vulnerable households’ means households in energy poverty or households, including lower middle- income onehouseholds, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of buildings into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC and lack the means to renovate the building they occupytransition towards climate neutrality, especially the price impacts of the revised Directive 2021/0213 to buildings and road transport and lack the means to renovate the building they occupy and lack the means to be able to be mobile when necessary for their economic or social wellbeing;
Amendment 179 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘vulnerable small and micro- enterprises’ means small and micro- enterprises that are significantly affected by the transition towards climate neutrality, especially the price impacts of the inclusion of buildings intorevised Directive 2021/0213 and the potential extension of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC to buildings and road transport and lack the means to renovate the building they occupy or to purchase zero and low-emission vehicles;
Amendment 183 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
The measures and investments supported by the Fund shall benefit vulnerable households, vulnerable small and micro- enterprises and, vulnerable transport users, and workers in sectors which are vulnerable and particularly affected by the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, especially households in energy poverty and citizens without public transport alternative to individual cars (in remote and rural areas).
Amendment 190 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘vulnerable transport users’ means transport users, including from lower middle-income households, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/ECtransition towards climate neutrality, at risk of mobility poverty, especially because of the price impacts of the revised Directive 2021/0213 and the potential inclusion of road transport and lack the means to purchase zero- and low- emission vehicles or to switch to alternative sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, particularly in rural and remote areas.
Amendment 191 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
The general objective of the Fund is to contribute to the transition towards climate neutrality by addressinglimiting as much as possible the social impacts of the transition and the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC. The specific objective of the Fund is to support vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users through temporary direct income support and through measures and investments intended to increase energy efficiency of buildings, decarbonisation of heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy from renewable sources, and granting improved access to zero- and low-emission mobility and transport, and helping to ensure workers are sufficiently supported in order to re-skill or upskill their qualifications.
Amendment 193 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission a Social Climate Plan (‘the Plan’) together with the update to the integrated national energy and climate plan referred to in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 in accordance with the procedure and timeline laid down in that Article. The Plan shall contain a coherent set of measures and investments to address energy and mobility poverty, in particular the impact of carbon pricing on vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and, vulnerable transport users and workers in affected sectors in order to ensure affordable heating, cooling and mobility while accompanying and accelerating necessary measures to meet the climate targets of the Union.
Amendment 211 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) finance measures and investments to ensure workers reskilling and upskilling in affected sectors.
Amendment 215 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘vulnerable households’ means households in energy poverty or households, including lower middle- income onehouseholds, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of buildings intotransition towards climate neutrality, especially the price impacts of the revised Directive 2021/0213 and the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC to buildings and road transport and lack the means to renovate the building they occupy and lack the means to be able to be mobile when necessary for their economic or social wellbeing;
Amendment 220 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘vulnerable small and micro- enterprises’ means small and micro- enterprises that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of buildings intotransition towards climate neutrality, especially the price impacts of the revised Directive 2021/0213 and the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC to buildings and road transport and lack the means to renovate the building they occupy or to purchase zero and low-emission vehicles;
Amendment 224 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) an estimate of the likely effects of that increase in prices on households, and in particular on incidence of energy poverty, on small and micro-enterprises and on transport users, and of the needed upskilling and reskilling of workers in affected sectors, comprising in particular an estimate and the identification of vulnerable households, vulnerable small and micro- enterprises and, vulnerable transport users and affected sectors and workers; these impacts are to be analysed with a sufficient level of regional disaggregation, taking into account elements such as access to public transport and basic services and identifying the areas mostly affected, particularly territories which are remote and rural; these impacts shall also be analysed and assessed regularly taking into consideration the fact that a household may become vulnerable at any particular moment and for varying socio- economic reasons;
Amendment 227 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘vulnerable transport users’ means transport users, including from lower middle-income households, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of road transport intotransition towards climate neutrality, at risk of mobility poverty, especially because of the price impacts of the revised Directive 2021/0213 and the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC to road transport and lack the means to purchase zero- and low- emission vehicles or to switch to alternative sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, particularly in rural and remote areas.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) where the Plan provides for measures referred to in Article 3(2), the criteria for the identification of eligible final recipients, the indication of the envisaged time limit for the measures in question and their justification on the basis of a quantitative estimate and a qualitative explanation of how the measures in the Plan are expected to reduce energy and transportmobility poverty and, the vulnerability of households, micro-enterprises and transport users to an increase of road transport and heating fuel prices and to update the qualifications of workers;
Amendment 239 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) envisaged milestones, targets and an indicative timetable for the implementation of the measures and investments to be completed by 31 July 2032[10 years after the transposition date of the revised Directive 2003/87/EC];
Amendment 244 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Plan may include national measures providing temporary direct income support to vulnerable households and households that are vulnerable transport users to reduce the impact of the increase in the price of fossil fuels resulting from the revised Directive 2021/0213 and the inclusion of buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Amendment 255 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) zero- and low-emission mobility and transport, taking into account the carbon footprint of vehicles throughout their life cycle;
Amendment 260 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) greenhouse gas emissions reductions relating to measures and investments in accordance with Article 6;
Amendment 267 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) update of the qualifications of workers in affected sectors.
Amendment 268 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) an estimate of the likely effects of that increase in prices on households, and in particular on incidence of energy poverty, on small and micro-enterprises and on transport users, comprising in particular an estimate and the identification of vulnerable households, vulnerable small and micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users; these impacts are to be analysed with a sufficient level of regional disaggregation, taking into account elements such as access to public transport and basic services and identifying the areas mostly affected, particularly territories which are remote and rural; these impacts shall also be analysed in a continuous manner taking into consideration the fact that a household may become vulnerable at any particular moment and for varying socio-economic reasons;
Amendment 273 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may include the costs of measures providing temporary direct income support, including reduction of taxes and fees, as a transitional measure to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users to absorb the increase in road transport and heating fuel prices. Such support shall decrease over time and be limited to the direct impact of the revised measures outlined in Directive 2021/0213 and emission trading for buildings and road transport. Eligibility for such direct income support shall ceases within the time limits identified underset out in Article 4(1) point (d).
Amendment 278 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) envisaged milestones, targets and an indicative timetable for the implementation of the measures and investments to be completed by 31 July 2032[10 years after date of application date of the revised Directive 2003/87/EC];
Amendment 284 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 288 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) support public and private entities, in particular public-private cooperation, in developing and providing affordable energy efficiency renovation solutions and appropriate funding instruments in line with the social goals of the Fund;
Amendment 291 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) provide financial support or fiscal incentives to improve access to zero- and low- emission vehicles and bikcycles, including financial support covering the purchase or fiscal incentives for their purchase or lease as well as for appropriate public and private infrastructure, including for recharging and refuelling; as well as for the development of a second-hand zero and low-emission vehicle market; for support concerning low-emission vehicles, a timetable for gradually reducing the support shall be provided; for support concerning the purchase of low- and/or zero emission vehicles.
Amendment 297 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) help operators develop and strengthen the supply of quality public transport, in terms of timing, frequency, punctuality and service, in particular those serving areas in habited mainly by vulnerable households;
Amendment 301 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) support public and private entities in developing and providing affordable zero- and low-emission mobility and transport services and the uptake of attractive and safe active mobility options for rural, insular, outermost regions, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas or for less developed regions or territories, including less developed peri- urban areas. including investments in attractive and safe active mobility infrastructure;
Amendment 311 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Fund shall not support, and the estimated total costs of Plans shall not include measures in the form of direct income support pursuant to Article 3(2) of this Regulation to the extent that these are additional and complementary to the support provided for households already benefiting:
Amendment 313 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Fund shall only support direct income support to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users, and measures and investments respecting the principle of ‘do no significant harm’ referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
Amendment 327 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may include the costs of measures providing temporary direct income support to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users to absorb the increase in road transport and heating fuel prices. Such support shall decrease over time and be limited to the direct impact of the revised measures outlined in Directive 2021/0213 and emission trading for buildings and road transport. Eligibility for such direct income support shall cease within the time limits identified under Article 4(1) point (d).
Amendment 328 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 20254-2027 shall be at least EUR 23 700 000 000 in current prices.
Amendment 336 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 2028-2032 shall be at least EUR 48 500 000 000 in current prices, subject to the availability of the amounts under the annual ceilings of the applicable multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312 TFEU.
Amendment 351 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Support under the Fund shall be additional to the support provided under other Union, national and, where appropriate, regional funds, programmes and instruments. Measures and investments supported under the Fund may receive support from other Union funds, programmes and instruments provided that such support does not cover the same cost.
Amendment 352 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Fund shall not support, and the estimated total costs of Plans shall not include measures in the form of direct income support pursuant to Article 3(2) of this Regulation to the extent that these are additional and complementary to the support provided for households already benefiting:
Amendment 352 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Support under the Fund shall be used in synergy, complementarity, coherence and consistency with other funds, programmes and instruments at Union, national and, where appropriate, regional levels, in particular the Modernisation Fund established by Directive 2003/87/EC, the Invest EU Programme, the Technical Support Instrument, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and the Funds covered by Regulation (EU) 2021/1060.
Amendment 357 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a Pre-financing 1. Subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing decision referred to in Article 16(1), when a Member State requests pre-financing together with the submission of the Plan, the Commission shall make a pre- financing payment of an amount of up to 13% of the financial contribution. By derogation from Article 116(1) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission shall make the corresponding payment within, to the extent possible, two months after the adoption by the Commission of the legal commitment referred to in Article 18. 2. In cases of pre-financing under paragraph 1 of this Article, the financial contributions shall be adjusted proportionally.
Amendment 359 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall contribute at least to 50 percent of the total estimated costs of the measures and investments referred to in Article 6(2) in their Plans. By way of derogation, the contribution of the Member States providing funding for measures or direct income support in a region with a GDP per capita at market prices below 75% of the Union average during the period 2016 to 2021 shall be limited to a maximum of 40 percent of the total estimated costs of the measures and investments referred to in Article 6(2) in their Plans.
Amendment 364 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 20254-2027 shall be at least EUR 23 700 000 000 in current prices.
Amendment 373 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 2028-2032 shall be at least EUR 48 500 000 000 in current prices, subject to the availability of the amounts under the annual ceilings of the applicable multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312 TFEU.
Amendment 384 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Support under the Fund shall be additional to the support provided under other Union funds, programmes and instruments. Measures and investments supported under the Fund may receive support from other Un, national and, where appropriate, regional funds, programmes and instruments provided that such support does not cover the same cost.
Amendment 386 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Support under the Fund shall be used in synergy, complementarity, coherence and consistency with other funds, programmes and instruments at Union, national and, where appropriate, regional levels, in particular the Modernisation Fund established by Directive 2003/87/EC, the InvestEU Programme, the Technical Support Instrument, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and the Funds covered by Regulation (EU) 2021/1060.
Amendment 391 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. After the Commission has adopted a decision as referred to in Article 16, it shall in due time conclude an agreement with the Member State concerned constituting an individual legal commitment within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 covering the period 20254-2027. That agreement may be concluded at the earliest one year before the year of the start of the auctions under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Amendment 392 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a Pre-financing 1. Subject to the adoption by the Commission of the implementing decision referred to in Article 16(1), when a Member State requests pre-financing together with the submission of the Plan, the Commission shall make a pre- financing payment of an amount of up to 13% of the financial contribution. By derogation from Article 116(1) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission shall make the corresponding payment within, to the extent possible, two months after the adoption by the Commission of the legal commitment referred to in Article 18. 2. In cases of pre-financing under paragraph 1 of this Article, the financial contributions shall be adjusted proportionally.
Amendment 395 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. Where, within 12 months of the date of the conclusion of relevant agreements referred to in Article 18, no tangible progress has been made in respect of any relevant milestones and targets by the Member State concerned, the Commission shall terminate the relevant agreements referred to in Article 18 and shall de-commit the amount of the financial allocation. Any pre-financing in accordance with Article [13a] shall be recovered in full. The Commission shall take a decision on the termination of agreements referred to in Article 18 after having given the Member State concerned the possibility to present its observations within a period of two months of the communication of its assessment as to whether no tangible progress has been made. Any decommitted amounts shall be proportionally allocated to other Member States.
Amendment 396 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission and the Member States concerned shall, in a manner commensurate to their respective responsibilities, foster synergies and ensure effective coordination between the Fund and other Union programmes and instruments, including the Modernisation Fund, InvestEU Programme, the Technical Support Instrument, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and the Funds covered by Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. For that purpose, they shall:
Amendment 399 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States shall contribute at a maximum 50 percent of the total estimated costs of the measures and investments referred to in Article 6(2) in their Plans. By way of derogation, the contribution of the Member States providing funding for measures or direct income support in a region with a GDP per capita at market prices below 75% of the Union average during the period 2016 to 2018 shall be limited to a maximum of 40 percent of the total estimated costs of the measures and investments referred to in Article 6(2) in their Plans.
Amendment 408 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. By 31 December 2033, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions with an independent ex post evaluation report of the Fund's use between 2024-2032.
Amendment 411 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. The evaluation report shall, in particular, assess to which extent the objectives of the Fund laid down in Article 1 have been achieved, the efficiency of the use of the resources and the Union added value. It shall consider the continued relevance of all objectives and actions set out in Article 6 in light of the potential impact on greenhouse gas emissions from the emission trading system for buildings and road transport pursuant to Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC and from the national measures taken to meet the binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council63 . It shall also consider the continued relevance ofexamines to what extent the financial envelope of the Fund remains relation toevant with regard to the possible developments concerningolution of the costs of the transition such as the auctioning of allowances underwithin the framework of the emissions trading system for buildings and road transport pursuant to, in accordance with the Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC, and other relevant considerations such as the evolution of the prices of energy and raw materials necessary for the ecological transition. _________________ 63Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 (OJ L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 26-42).
Amendment 414 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The ex post evaluation report shall consist of a global assessment of the Fund and shall include information on its impact.
Amendment 417 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from no later than the date by which the Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the European Parliament and the Council64 amending Directive 2003/87/EC as regards Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC, and at the earliest on 1st January 2024. _________________ 64[Directive (EU) yyyy/nnn of the European Parliament and of the Council…. (OJ …..).] [Directive amending Directive 2003/87/EC]
Amendment 439 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. After the Commission has adopted a decision as referred to in Article 16, it shall in due time conclude an agreement with the Member State concerned constituting an individual legal commitment within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 covering the period 20254-2027. That agreement may be concluded at the earliest one year before the year of the start of the auctions under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Amendment 455 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission and the Member States concerned shall, in a manner commensurate to their respective responsibilities, foster synergies and ensure effective coordination between the Fund and other Union programmes and instruments, including the Modernisation Fund, InvestEU Programme, the Technical Support Instrument, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and the Funds covered by Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. For that purpose, they shall:
Amendment 468 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. By 31 December 2033, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions with an independent ex post evaluation report of the Fund's use between 2024-2032.
Amendment 471 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The ex post evaluation report shall consist of a global assessment of the Fund and shall include information on its impact.
Amendment 473 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from no later than the date by which the Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the European Parliament and the Council64 amending Directive 2003/87/EC as regards Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC, and at the earliest on 1 January 2024. _________________ 64 [Directive (EU) yyyy/nnn of the European Parliament and of the Council…. (OJ …..).] [Directive amending Directive 2003/87/EC]
Amendment 82 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Those EU fleet-wide targets are toshould be complemented by the necessary roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure as set out in. For this reason, considering the insufficient implementation of Directive 2014/94/EU of the of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . _________________ 27 Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on, this proposal should be accompanied by an ambitious proposal for a Regulation on the Deployment of Alternative Fuels Infrastructure, providing for mandatory targets for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (OJ L 307 28.10.2014, p. 1)throughout the EU Member States.
Amendment 93 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Manufacturers should be provided with sufficient flexibility in adapting their fleets over time in order to manage the transition towards zero-emission vehicles in a cost-efficient manner, and i. The progressively more ambitious emission reduction targets have increased the costs of compliance for manufacturers. It is therefore appropriate, now more than ever, to maintain the approach of decreasing target levels in five-year steps.
Amendment 111 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In view of the increased overall greenhouse gas emissions reduction objectives and to avoid potential market distorting effects, the reduction requirements for all manufacturers present in the Union market should be aligned, except for those responsible for less than 1 0000 new vehicles registered in a calendar year. Consequently, the possibility for manufacturers responsible for between 1 000 and 10 000 passenger cars or between 1 000 andpassenger cars or 22 000 new light commercial vehicles newly registered in a calendar year to apply for a derogation from their specific emission targets should cease from 2030 onwards.
Amendment 135 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
In paragraph 4, point (a) is replaced by the following: "4. From 1 January 2025, the following EU fleet-wide targets shall apply: (a) for the average emissions of the new passenger car fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 15 % reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part A of Annex I; as set in Regulation (EU) 2019/631;" Or. en (32019R0631)
Amendment 137 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
(1b) paragraph 4 point (b) is replaced by the following: "(b) for the average emissions of the new light commercial vehicles fleet, an EU fleet-wide target equal to a 15 % reduction of the target in 2021 determined in accordance with point 6.1.1 of Part BA of Annex I. as set in Regulation (EU) 2019/631;" Or. en (32019R0631)
Amendment 146 #
2021/0197(COD)
(i) in point (a), the figure “37,5 %” is replaced by ‘550 %’,
Amendment 156 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 5a
Article 1 – paragraph 5a
Amendment 167 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Amendment 174 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 1 – paragraph 7
Article 1 – paragraph 7
(d) paragraph 7 is deleted;amended: "7. From 1 January 2030, the following zero- and low-emission vehicles' benchmarks shall apply in accordance with points 6.3 of Parts A and B of Annex I, respectively: (a) a benchmark equal to a 40 % share of the fleet of new passenger cars; and (b) a benchmark equal to a 35 % share of the fleet of new light commercial vehicles."
Amendment 199 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 233 #
2021/0197(COD)
1. The Commission shall, in 2028, at the latest, thoroughly, review the effectiveness and impact of this Regulation, building on the two yearly reporting, and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council with the result of the review.
Amendment 236 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
(b) paragraphs 2 to 5 are deleted, 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. In the report referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall consider, inter alia, the real-world representativeness of the CO2 emission and fuel or energy consumption values determined pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007; the deployment on the Union market of zero- and low-emission vehicles, in particular with respect to light commercial vehicles; the roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure reported under Regulation (XXX) of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure , including their financing; the implementation of the Energy Performance of the building Directive 2010/31/EU and its foreseen review; the potential contribution of the use of synthetic and advanced alternative fuels produced with renewable energy to emissions reductions; the CO2 emissions reduction actually observed at the existing fleet level; the functioning of the incentive mechanism for zero- and low-emission vehicles; the potential effects of the transitional measure set out in point 6.3 of Part A of Annex I; the impact of this Regulation on consumers, particularly on those on low and medium incomes; as well as aspects to further facilitate an economically viable and socially fair transition towards clean, competitive and affordable mobility in the Union. The Commission shall, in that report, also identify a clear pathway for further CO2 emissions reductions for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles beyond 2030 in order to significantly contribute to achieving the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement.’
Amendment 239 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
(ba) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3.The report referred to in paragraph 2 shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amending this Regulation, in particular, the possible revision of the EU fleet-wide targets for 2030 in light of the elements listed in paragraph 2, and the introduction of binding emissions reduction targets for 2035 and 2040 onwards for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles to ensure the timely transformation of the transport sector towards achieving net-zero emissions in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. ’ Or. en Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Amendment 255 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU)2019/631
Annex I, Part A, point 6.1.2.
Annex I, Part A, point 6.1.2.
EU fleet-wide target for 2030 to 2034onwards
Amendment 256 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Amendment 265 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Amendment 268 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation EU (2019/631)
Annex I, Part A, point 6.3
Annex I, Part A, point 6.3
6.3.1 Specific emissions targets for 2025 to 2029onwards:
Amendment 273 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1
specific emissions reference target is the specific emissions reference target of CO2 determined in accordance with point 6.2.1 for the period 2025 to 2029 and point 6.2.2 for 2030 onwards;
Amendment 279 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1.
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.1.
x is 15 % in the years 2025 to 2029 and 40% from 2030 onwards..
Amendment 285 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU)2019/631
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.2
Annex I – Part A – point 6.3.2
6.3.2 Specific emissions targets for 2030 to 2034onwards
Amendment 303 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Amendment 323 #
2021/0197(COD)
‘The EU fleet-wide targets for 2025 onwardsand 2030”
Amendment 333 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.1.2
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.1.2
Amendment 338 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
Annex I – Part B – point 6.1.3
Amendment 345 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2.
Annex I – Part B – point 6.2.2.
Amendment 353 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.2.3.
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.2.3.
Amendment 360 #
2021/0197(COD)
(ea) point 6.3.1 of Annex I part B is replaced by the following: ‘6.3.1. Specific emissions targets for 2025 to 2029 The sSpecific emissions target = (specific emissions reference target – (øtargets – EU fleet-wide target2025)) ·correction). ZLEV factor where: sSpecific emissions reference target is the specific emissions reference target for the manufacturer determined in accordance with point 6.2.1; Øtargets EU fleet-wide target2025correction = (øtarget – EU fleet-wide target2021) · (1- reduction factor2025) øtarget is the average, weighted on the number of new light commercial vehicles of each individual manufacturer, of all the specific emissions reference targets determined in accordance with point 6.2.1, by 31 October 2024 and every second year thereafter, the figures Øtarget for new light commercial vehicles in the preceding two calendar years starting with 2022 and 2023. The new respective Øtarget shall apply from 1 January of the calendar year following the date of the adjustment; ZLEV factor is (1 + y – x), unless this sum is larger than 1,05 or lower than 1,0 in which case the ZLEV factor shall be set to 1,05 or 1,0, as the case may be;: Where; y is the share of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet of new light commercial vehiclepassenger cars calculated as the total number of new zero- and low- emission vehicles, where each of them is counted as ZLEVspecific in accordance with the following formula, divided by the total number of new light commercial vehiclepassenger cars registered in the relevant calendar year: ZLEVspecific = x is 15%’ (𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 50 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑂2 ) ZLEVspecific = (𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 50 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑂2 ) x is 15%’ Or. en(Regulation (EU) 2019/631)
Amendment 368 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f – introductory part
Regulation (EU) 2019/613
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.3.2
Annex I – Part B – Point 6.3.2
(f) point 6.3.2 is replaced by the following: ‘6.3.2 Specific emissions targets forom 2030 to 2034onwards Specific emissions target = (specific emissions reference target – (øtargets – EU fleet-wide target2030))correction) . ZLEV factor where: sSpecific emissions reference target is the specific emissions reference target for the manufacturer determined in accordance with point 6.2.2; EU fleet-wide target2030correction = (øtarget – EU fleet-wide target2021) (1- reduction factor2030) øtargets is the average, weighted on the number of new light commercial vehicles of each individual manufacturer, of all the specific emissions reference targets determined in accordance with point 6.2.2 EU fleet-wide target2030 is as determined in point 6.1.2.1, by 31 October 2024 and every second year thereafter, the figures Øtarget for new light commercial vehicles in the preceding two calendar years starting with 2022 and 2023. The new respective Øtarget shall apply from 1 January of the calendar year following the date of the adjustment; ZLEV factor is (1 + y – x), unless this sum is larger than 1,05 or lower than 1,0 in which case the ZLEV factor shall be set to 1,05 or 1,0, as the case may be; where; y is the share of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet of new passenger cars calculated as the total number of new zero- and low- emission vehicles, where each of them is counted as ZLEVspecific in accordance with the following formula, divided by the total number of new passenger cars registered in the relevant calendar year: ZLEVspecific = (𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝟓𝟎 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝑶𝟐 ) x is 50%’
Amendment 383 #
2021/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g
Regulation (EU) 2019/631
Annex I – Part B – point 6.3.3
Annex I – Part B – point 6.3.3
Amendment 289 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) European Green Bonds are financial products based on taxonomy aligned projects and issuers who do not have entity-level transition plans detailing their path to climate neutrality by 2050 should be able to emit European Green Bonds if they respect the requirements specified in this regulation;.
Amendment 339 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5a) ‘home Member State’ means [(i)] for European green bond issuances subject to the requirement to establish a prospectus pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, a home Member State as defined in Article 2, point (m), of that Regulation; [(ii)] for European green bond issuances that are not subject to the obligation to establish a prospectus that are made by issuers having their registered office in the Union, the Member State where the issuer has its registered office; (iii) for European green bond issuances not mentioned in points (i) and (ii), the Member State where the securities are intended to be offered to the public for the first time.
Amendment 358 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The use of proceeds referred to in Article 4 shall relate to economic activities that meet the taxonomy requirements, or that will meet the taxonomy requirements within a defined period of time as set out in a taxonomy-alignment plan as defined in paragraph 1.1.2.2 of annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 of 6 July 2021 and shall be referred to as CapEx plans.
Amendment 362 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 368 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The period referred to in the first and second subparagraph shall not exceed five years from bond issuance, unless a longer period of up to ten years is justified by the specific features of the economic activities concerned as documented in a taxonomy- alignment plan (CapEx plan).
Amendment 420 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6
Article 9 – paragraph 6
6. Issuers of European green bonds shall provide the allocation reports referred to in paragraph 3, 4, and 5 to an external reviewer within 390 days following the end of the year to which the allocation reports refer. The post-issuance review must be made public within 90 days following the receipt of the allocation report.
Amendment 434 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Issuers of European Green bonds may obtain a review of the impact report by an external reviewer.
Amendment 465 #
2021/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. External reviewers shall adopt and implement measures to ensure that their pre-issuance reviews as referred to in Article 8 and their post-issuance reviews as referred to in Article 9 are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to them and that, according to their transparent and public methodologies, is relevant to their analysis.
Amendment 77 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) Welcomes the regulation on artificial intelligence, which aims to create legal certainty and coherence across the EU. Notes however, that the transport and tourism sectors are already regulated by sector specific rules, and recalls the need for ensuring the coherence and complementarity with the existing legislation. To avoid unnecessary overlap and double regulation, this Regulation should only apply when sector specific legislation posing equal or stricter rules is not already in place.
Amendment 103 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) High data quality is essential for the performance of many AI systems, especially when techniques involving the training of models are used, with a view to ensure that the high-risk AI system performs as intended and safely and it does not become the source of discrimination prohibited by Union law. High quality training, validation and testing data sets require the implementation of appropriate data governance and management practices. Training, validation and testing data sets should be sufficiently relevant, representative and, up-to-date, free of errors to the best extent possible and as complete as possible in view of the intended purpose of the system. They should also have the appropriate statistical properties, including as regards the persons or groups of persons on which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. In particular, training, validation and testing data sets should take into account, to the extent required in the light of their intended purpose, the features, characteristics or elements that are particular to the specific geographical, sectorial, behavioural or functional setting or context within which the AI system is intended to be used. In order to protect the right of others from the discrimination that might result from the bias in AI systems, the providers shouldbe able to process also special categories of personal data, as a matter of substantial public interest, in order to ensure the bias monitoring, detection, update and correction in relation to high- risk AI systems.
Amendment 111 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
Recital 71
(71) Artificial intelligence is a rapidly developing family of technologies that requires novel forms of regulatory oversight and a safe space for experimentation, while ensuring responsible innovation and integration of appropriate safeguards and risk mitigation measures. To ensure a legal framework that is innovation-friendly, future-proof and resilient to disruption, national competent authorities from one or more Member States should be encouraged to establish artificial intelligence regulatory sandboxes to facilitate the development and testing of innovative AI systems under strict regulatory oversight before these systems are placed on the market or otherwise put into service. It is especially important to ensure that SMEs and start-ups can easily access these sandboxes, are actively involved and participate in the development and testing of innovative AI systems, in order to be able to contribute with their knowhow and experience. Their participation should be supported and facilitated.
Amendment 115 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76
Recital 76
(76) In order to facilitate a smooth, effective and harmonised implementation of this Regulation a European Artificial Intelligence Board should be established. The Board should be responsible for a number of advisory tasks, including issuing opinions, recommendations, advice or guidance on matters related to the implementation of this Regulation, including on technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements established in this Regulation and providing advice to and assisting the Commission on specific questions related to artificial intelligence. In order to ensure a common and consistent approach to the development of AI and ensure good cooperation and exchange of views, the Board should regularly consult other EU institutions as well as all sector-specific relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 116 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 77 a (new)
Recital 77 a (new)
(77 a) To encourage knowledge sharing from best practices, the Commission should organise regular consultative meetings for knowhow exchange between different Member States' national authorities responsible for notification policy.
Amendment 202 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Training, validation and testing data sets shall be relevant, representative, up-to- date, free of errors to the best extent possible and as complete as possible. They shall have the appropriate statistical properties, including, where applicable, as regards the persons or groups of persons on which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. These characteristics of the data sets may be met at the level of individual data sets or a combination thereof.
Amendment 236 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39 a Exchange of knowhow and best practices The Commission shall facilitate regular consultative meetings for the exchange of knowhow and best practices between the Member States' national authorities responsible for notification policy.
Amendment 239 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 2
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, when preparing the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, shall gather the views of relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectorial Union law, as well as relevant sector-specific stakeholders.
Amendment 253 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 53 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The organisers of AI regulatory sandboxes shall ensure an easy access for SMEs and start-ups by facilitating and supporting their participation and mitigating administrative burden, which might arise from joining.
Amendment 263 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 1
Article 57 – paragraph 1
1. The Board shall be composed of the national supervisory authorities, who shall be represented by the head or equivalent high-level official of that authority, and the European Data Protection Supervisor. Other national, regional and local authorities may be invited to the meetings, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them.
Amendment 265 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 57 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Board shall organise consultations with stakeholders at least twice a year. Such stakeholders shall include representatives from industry, SMEs and start-ups, civil society organisations such as NGOs, consumer associations, the social partners and academia, to assess the evolution of trends in technology, issues related to the implementation and the effectiveness of this Regulation, regulatory gaps or loopholes observed in practice.
Amendment 271 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 3
Article 60 – paragraph 3
3. Information contained in the EU database shall be accessible to the public, user-friendly, easily navigable and machine-readable.
Amendment 280 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 3
Article 69 – paragraph 3
3. Codes of conduct may be drawn up by national, regional or local authorities, by individual providers of AI systems or by organisations representing them or by both, including with the involvement of users and any interested stakeholders and their representative organisations. Codes of conduct may cover one or more AI systems taking into account the similarity of the intended purpose of the relevant systems.
Amendment 348 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) A Union legal framework laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence is therefore needed to foster the development, use and uptake of artificial intelligence in the internal market that at the same time meets a high level of protection of public interests, such as health and safety and the protection of fundamental rights, as recognised and protected by Union law. To achieve that objective, rules regulating the placing on the market and putting into service of certain AI systems should be laid down, thus ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and allowing those systems to benefit from the principle of free movement of goods and services. By laying down those rules as well as measures in support of innovation with a particular focus on SMEs and start-ups, this Regulation supports the objective of the Union of being a global leader in the development of secure, trustworthy and ethical artificial intelligence, as stated by the European Council33 , and it ensures the protection of ethical principles, as specifically requested by the European Parliament34 . _________________ 33 European Council, Special meeting of the European Council (1 and 2 October 2020) – Conclusions, EUCO 13/20, 2020, p. 6. 34 European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, 2020/2012(INL).
Amendment 358 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The notion of AI system should be clearly defined to ensure legal certainty, while providing the flexibility to accommodate future technological developments. Therefore, the term AI system should be defined in line with internationally accepted definitions. The definition should be based on the key functional characteristics of the softwareAI systems, in particular the ability, for a given set of human-defined objectives, to generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions which influence the environment with which the system interacts, be it in air physical or digital dimensionenvironment. AI systems can be designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy and be used on a stand- alone basis or as a component of a product, irrespective of whether the system is physically integrated into the product (embedded) or serve the functionality of the product without being integrated therein (non-embedded). The definition of AI system should be complemented by a list of specific techniques and approaches used for its development, which should be kept up-to– date in the light of market and technological developments through the adoption of delegated acts by the Commission to amend that list. In order to ensure alignment of definitions on an international level, the European Commission should engage in a dialogue with international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), should their definitions of the term ‘AI system’ be adjusted.
Amendment 374 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The notion of remote biometric identification system as used in this Regulation should be defined functionally, as an AI system intended for the identification of natural persons at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database, and without prior knowledge whether the targeted person will be present and can be identified, irrespectively of the particular technology, processes or types of biometric data used. Considering their different characteristics and manners in which they are used, as well as the different risks involved, a distinction should be made between ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification systems. In the case of ‘real-time’ systems, the capturing of the biometric data, the comparison and the identification occur all instantaneously, near-instantaneously or in any event without a significant delay. In this regard, there should be no scope for circumventing the rules of this Regulation on the ‘real- time’ use of the AI systems in question by providing for minor delays. ‘Real-time’ systems involve the use of ‘live’ or ‘near- ‘live’ material, such as video footage, generated by a camera or other device with similar functionality. In the case of ‘post’ systems, in contrast, the biometric data have already been captured and the comparison and identification occur only after a significant delay. This involves material, such as pictures or video footage generated by closed circuit television cameras or private devices, which has been generated before the use of the system in respect of the natural persons concerned. The notion of remote biometric identification system shall not include verification or authentification systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises.
Amendment 399 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) This Regulation should not undermine research and development activity and should respect freedom of science. It is therefore necessary to exclude from its scope AI systems specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development and to ensure that the Regulation does not otherwise affect scientific research and development activity on AI systems. As regards product oriented research activity by providers, the provisions of this Regulation should apply insofar as such research leads to or entails placing of an AI system on the market or putting it into service. Under all circumstances, any research and development activity should be carried out in accordance with recognised ethical standards for scientific research.
Amendment 404 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 b (new)
Recital 12 b (new)
(12 b) Given the complexity of the value chain for AI systems, it is essential to clarify the role of persons who may contribute to the development of AI systems covered by this Regulation, without being providers and thus being obliged to comply with the obligations and requirements established herein. It is necessary to clarify that general purpose AI systems - understood as AI systems that are able to perform generally applicable functions such as image/speech recognition, audio/video generation, pattern detection, question answering, translation etc. - should not be considered as having an intended purpose within the meaning of this Regulation, unless those systems have been adapted to a specific intended purpose that falls within the scope of this Regulation. Initial providers of general purpose AI systems should therefore only have to comply with the provisions on accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity as laid down in Art. 15 of this Regulation. If a person adapts a general purpose AI application to a specific intended purpose and places it on the market or puts it into service, it shall be considered the provider and be subject to the obligations laid down in this Regulation. The initial provider of a general purpose AI application shall, after placing it on the market or putting it to service, and without compromising its own intellectual property rights or trade secrets, provide the new provider with all essential, relevant and reasonably expected information that is necessary to comply with the obligations set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 430 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The placing on the market, putting into service or use of certain AI systems intended towith the objective to or the effect of distorting human behaviour, whereby physical or psychological harms are reasonably likely to occur, should be forbidden. Such AI systems deploy subliminal components individuals cannot perceive or exploit vulnerabilities of children and people due to their age, physical or mental incapacitiesspecific groups of persons due to their age, disabilities, social or economic situation. They do so with the intention to materially distort the behaviour of a person and in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harm to that or another person. The intention may not be presumed if the distortion of human behaviour results from factors external to the AI system which are outside of the control of the provider or the user. Research for legitimate purposes in relation to such AI systems should not be stifled by the prohibition, if such research does not amount to use of the AI system in human- machine relations that exposes natural persons to harm and such research is carried out in accordance with recognised ethical standards for scientific research.
Amendment 534 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) As regards AI systems that are safety components of products, or which are themselves products, falling within the scope of certain Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate to classify them as high-risk under this Regulation if the product in question undergoes the conformity assessment procedure in order to ensure compliance with essential safety requirements with a third-party conformity assessment body pursuant to that relevant Union harmonisation legislation. In particular, such products are machinery, toys, lifts, equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres, radio equipment, pressure equipment, recreational craft equipment, cableway installations, appliances burning gaseous fuels, medical devices, and in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
Amendment 546 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) Technical inaccuracies of AI systems intended for the remote biometric identification of natural persons can lead to biased results and entail discriminatory effects. This is particularly relevant when it comes to age, ethnicity, sex or disabilities. Therefore, ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification systems should be classified as high-risk, except for verification or authentification systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises. In view of the risks that they pose, both types of remote biometric identification systems should be subject to specific requirements on logging capabilities and human oversight.
Amendment 563 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) AI systems used for making autonomous decisions or materially influencing decisions in employment, workers management and access to self- employment, notably for the recruitment and selection of persons, for making decisions on promotion and termination and for task allocation, monitoring or evaluation of persons in work-related contractual relationships, should also be classified as high-risk, since those systems may appreciably impact future career prospects and livelihoods of these persons. Relevant work-related contractual relationships should involve employees and persons providing services through platforms as referred to in the Commission Work Programme 2021. Such persons should in principle not be considered users within the meaning of this Regulation. Throughout the recruitment process and in the evaluation, promotion, or retention of persons in work-related contractual relationships, such systems may perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example against women, certain age groups, persons with disabilities, or persons of certain racial or ethnic origins or sexual orientation. AI systems used to monitor the performance and behaviour of these persons may also impact their rights to data protection and privacy.
Amendment 576 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) Another area in which the use of AI systems deserves special consideration is the access to and enjoyment of certain essential private and public services and benefits necessary for people to fully participate in society or to improve one’s standard of living. In particular, AI systems used to evaluate the credit score or creditworthiness of natural persons should be classified as high-risk AI systems, since they determine those persons’ access to financial resources or essential services such as housing, electricity, and telecommunication services. AI systems used for this purpose may lead to discrimination of persons or groups and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example based on racial or ethnic origins, disabilities, age, sexual orientation, or create new forms of discriminatory impacts. Considering the very limited scale of the impact and the available alternatives on the market, it is appropriate to exempt AI systems for the purpose of creditworthiness assessment and credit scoring when put into service by small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups for their own use. Natural persons applying for or receiving public assistance benefits and services from public authorities are typically dependent on those benefits and services and in a vulnerable position in relation to the responsible authorities. If AI systems are used for determining whether such benefits and services should be denied, reduced, revoked or reclaimed by authorities, they may have a significant impact on persons’ livelihood and may infringe their fundamental rights, such as the right to social protection, non- discrimination, human dignity or an effective remedy. Those systems should therefore be classified as high-risk. Nonetheless, this Regulation should not hamper the development and use of innovative approaches in the public administration, which would stand to benefit from a wider use of compliant and safe AI systems, provided that those systems do not entail a high risk to legal and natural persons. Finally, AI systems used to dispatch or establish priority in the dispatching of emergency first response services should also be classified as high- risk since they make decisions in very critical situations for the life and health of persons and their property.
Amendment 674 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
Recital 61
(61) Standardisation should play a key role to provide technical solutions to providers to ensure compliance with this Regulation. Compliance with harmonised standards as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council54 should be a means for providers to demonstrate conformity with the requirements of this Regulation. However, the Commission could adopt common technical specifications in areas where no harmonised standards exist or where they are insufficientand are not expected to be published within a reasonable period or where they are insufficient, only after consulting the Artificial Intelligence Board, the European standardisation organisations as well as the relevant stakeholders. The Commission should duly justify why it decided not to use harmonised standards. _________________ 54 Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12).
Amendment 713 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
Recital 70
(70) Certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons or to generate content may pose specific risks of impersonation or deception irrespective of whether they qualify as high-risk or not. In certain circumstances, the use of these systems should therefore be subject to specific transparency obligations without prejudice to the requirements and obligations for high-risk AI systems. In particular, natural persons should be notified that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the circumstances and the context of use or where the content is part of an obviously artistic, creative or fictional cinematographic work. Moreover, natural persons should be notified when they are exposed to an emotion recognition system or a biometric categorisation system. Such information and notifications should be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities. Further, users, who use an AI system to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, places or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic, should disclose, in an appropriate, clear and visible manner, that the content has been artificially created or manipulated by labelling the artificial intelligence output accordingly and disclosing its artificial origin.
Amendment 733 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 73
Recital 73
(73) In order to promote and protect innovation, it is important that the interests of small-scaletart-ups and SME providers and users of AI systems are taken into particular account. To this objective, Member States should develop initiatives, which are targeted at those operators, including on awareness raising and information communication. Moreover, the specific interests and needs of small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups shall be taken into account when Notified Bodies set conformity assessment fees. Translation costs related to mandatory documentation and communication with authorities may constitute a significant cost for providers and other operators, notably those of a smaller scale. Member States should possibly ensure that one of the languages determined and accepted by them for relevant providers’ documentation and for communication with operators is one which is broadly understood by the largest possible number of cross-border users.
Amendment 796 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) harmonised transparency rules for certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons, emotion recognition systems and biometric categorisation systems, and AI systems used to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content;
Amendment 797 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) rules on market monitoring and, market surveillance and governance; .
Amendment 802 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) measures in support of innovation with a particular focus on SMEs and start-ups, including the setting up of regulatory sandboxes and the reduction of regulatory burdens.
Amendment 861 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. This Regulation shall not apply to AI systems, including their output, specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development.
Amendment 863 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. This Regulation shall not apply to any research and development activity regarding AI systems in so far as such activity does not lead to or entail placing an AI system on the market or putting it into service.
Amendment 912 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘artificial intelligence system’ (AI system) means software that is developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing the environments they interact withreal or virtual environments; AI systems can be designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy and can be developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I;
Amendment 930 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘provid'developer’' means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body that develops an AI system or that has an AI system developed with a view toand placinges it on the market or puttings it into service under its own name or trademark, whether for payment or free of charge or that adapts general purpose AI systems to a specific intended purpose;
Amendment 947 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘usdeployer’ means any natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body using an AI system under its authority, except where the AI system is used in the course of a personal non- professional activity;
Amendment 1002 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 23
(23) ‘substantial modification’ means a change to the AI system following its placing on the market or putting into service, which affectsis not foreseen or planned by the provider and as a result of which the compliance of the AI system with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2 of this Regulation oris affected or which results in a modification to the intended purpose for which the AI system has been assessed. A substantial modification is given if the remaining risk is increased by the modification of the AI system under the application of all necessary protective measures;
Amendment 1009 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24
(24) ‘CE marking of conformity’ (CE marking) means a physical or digital marking by which a provider indicates that an AI system or a product with an embedded AI system is in conformity with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2 of this Regulation and other applicable Union legislation harmonising the conditions for the marketing of products (‘Union harmonisation legislation’) providing for its affixing;
Amendment 1044 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35
(35) ‘biometric categorisation system’ means an AI system for the purpose of assigning natural persons to specific categories, such as sex, age, hair colour, eye colour, tattoos, ethnic origin or sexual or political orientation, or inferring their characteristics and attributes on the basis of their biometric or biometrics-based data;
Amendment 1052 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36
(36) ‘remote biometric identification system’ means an AI system for the purpose of identifying natural persons at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database, and without prior knowledge of the user of the AI system whether the person will be present and can be identified , excluding verification/authentification systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises;
Amendment 1103 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 44 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 44 a (new)
(44 a) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a facility that provides a controlled environment that facilitates the safe development, testing and validation of innovative AI systems for a limited time before their placement on the market or putting into service pursuant to a specific plan;
Amendment 1111 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 44 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 44 b (new)
(44 b) ‘deep fake’ means an AI system that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, objects, places or other entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful.
Amendment 1129 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Amendment 1136 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to amend the list of techniques and approaches listed in Annex I, after an adequate and transparent consultation process involving the relevant stakeholders, to amend the list of techniques and approaches listed in Annex I within the scope of the definition of an AI system as provided for in Article 3(1), in order to update that list to market and technological developments on the basis of transparent characteristics that are similar to the techniques and approaches listed therein. Providers and users of AI systems should be given 24 months to comply with any amendment to Annex I.
Amendment 1169 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness in order towith the objective to or the effect of materially distorting a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is reasonably likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
Amendment 1181 #
2021/0106(COD)
(b) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of an individual, including characteristics of such individual’s known or predicted personality or social or economic situation, a specific group of persons due to their age, physical or mental or disability, in order to materially distort the behaviour of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
Amendment 1423 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the AI system is intended to be used as a main safety component of a product, or is itself a product, covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex II;
Amendment 1429 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the product whose main safety component is the AI system, or the AI system itself as a product, is required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment in order to ensure compliance with essential safety requirements with a view to the placing on the market or putting into service of that product pursuant to the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex II.
Amendment 1456 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a (new)
Amendment 1466 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to update the list in Annex III by adding high-risk AI systems where, after an adequate and transparent consultation process involving the relevant stakeholders, to update the list in Annex III by withdrawing areas from that list or by adding critical areas. For additions both of the following conditions arneed to be fulfilled:
Amendment 1503 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) the extent to which the AI system acts autonomously;
Amendment 1520 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) the potential misuse and malicious use of the AI system and of the technology underpinning it;
Amendment 1531 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(g a) magnitude and likelihood of benefit of the deployment of the AI system for individuals, groups, or society at large;
Amendment 1538 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point h – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point h – introductory part
(h) the extent to which existing Union legislation, in particular the GDPR, provides for:
Amendment 1549 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Commission shall provide a transitional period of at least 24 months following each update of Annex III.
Amendment 1555 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall comply with the requirements established in this Chapter, taking into account the generally acknowledged state of the art, including as reflected in relevant harmonised standards or common specifications.
Amendment 1575 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in appropriate relation to high- risk AI systems and its risks identified in the risk assessment referred to in Art. 6a.
Amendment 1587 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) identification and analysis of the known and foreseeable risks associated with eachmost likely to occur to health, safety and fundamental rights in view of the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system;
Amendment 1591 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 1598 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) evaluation of other possibly arisingnew arising significant risks based on the analysis of data gathered from the post-market monitoring system referred to in Article 61;
Amendment 1602 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The risks referred to in paragraph 2 shall concern only those which may be reasonably mitigated or eliminated through the development or design of the high-risk AI system, or the provision of adequate technical information.
Amendment 1609 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The risk management measures referred to in paragraph 2, point (d) shall be such that any residual significant risk associated with each hazard as well as the overall residual risk of the high-risk AI systems is reasonably judged to be acceptable, having regard to the benefits that the high-risk AI system is reasonably expected to deliver and provided that the high- risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse. Those residual significant risks shall be communicated to the user.
Amendment 1621 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) elimination or reduction of risks as far as posidentified and evaluated risks as far as economically and technologically feasible through adequate design and development of the high-risk AI system;
Amendment 1624 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) where appropriate, implementation of adequate mitigation and control measures in relation to significant risks that cannot be eliminated;
Amendment 1639 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. High-risk AI systems shall be tesevaluated for the purposes of identifying the most appropriate and targeted risk management measures. Testing and weighing any such measures against the potential benefits and intended goals of the system. Evaluations shall ensure that high-risk AI systems perform consistently for their intended purpose and they are in compliance with the relevant requirements set out in this Chapter.
Amendment 1669 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 9
Article 9 – paragraph 9
9. For credit institutions regulated by Directive 2013/36/EUproviders and AI systems already covered by Union law that require them to establish a specific risk management, the aspects described in paragraphs 1 to 8 shall be part of the risk management procedures established by those institutions pursuant to Article 74 of that Directiveat Union law or deemed to be covered as part of it.
Amendment 1673 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems which make use of techniques involving the training of models with data shall be, as far as this can be reasonably expected and is feasible from a technical and economical point of view, developed on the basis of training, validation and testing data sets that meet the quality criteria referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 1683 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Training, validation and testing data sets shall be subject to appropriate data governance and management practices appropriate for the context of the use as well as the intended purpose of the AI system. Those practices shall concern in particular,
Amendment 1702 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) examination in view of possible biases that are likely to affect the output of the AI system;
Amendment 1707 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the identification of any possiblesignificant data gaps or shortcomings, and how those gaps and shortcomings can be addressed.
Amendment 1715 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Training, validation and testing data sets shall be relevant, representative, free of errors and completeHigh-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed with the best efforts to ensure that training, validation and testing data sets shall be relevant, representative, and to the best extent possible, free of errors and complete in accordance with industry standards. They shall have the appropriate statistical properties, including, where applicable, as regards the persons or groups of persons on which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. These characteristics of the data sets may be met at the level of individual data sets or a combination thereof.
Amendment 1742 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. Appropriate data governance and management practices shall apply fFor the development of high-risk AI systems nother than those which make use of using techniques involving the training of models in order to ensure that those high-risk AI systems comply with paragraph 2, paragraphs 2 to 5 shall apply only to the testing data sets.
Amendment 1753 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The technical documentation shall be drawn up in such a way to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements set out in this Chapter and provide national competent authorities and notified bodies with all the necessary information to assess the compliance of the AI system with those requirements. It shall contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex IV or, in the case of SMEs and start-ups, any equivalent documentation meeting the same objectives, subject to approval of the competent authority.
Amendment 1778 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1790 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way to ensure that their operation is sufficiently transparent to enable users to interpret the system’s output and use it appropriately. An appropriate type and degree of transparency shall be ensured, with a view to achieving compliance with the relevant obligations of the user and of the provider set out in Chapter 3 of this Title. Transparency shall thereby mean that, to the extent that can be reasonably expected and is feasible in technical terms, the AI systems output is interpretable by the user and the user is able to understand the general functionality of the AI system and its use of data.
Amendment 1793 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. High-risk AI systems shall be accompanied by instructions for use in an appropriate digital format or otherwise that include concise, complete, correct and clear information that helps supporting informed decision-making by users and is relevant, accessible and comprehensible to users.
Amendment 1801 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii
Amendment 1808 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(e a) a description of the mechanisms included within the AI system that allow users to properly collect, store and interpret the logs in accordance with Article 12(1).
Amendment 1812 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. HWhere proportionate to the risks associated with the high-risk system and where technical safeguards are not sufficient, high-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way, including with appropriate human-machine interface tools, that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which the AI system is in use.
Amendment 1830 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The measures referred to For the purpose of implementing paragraph 3 shall enable the individuals to whom human oversight is assigned to do the following, as appropriate to the circumstances 1 to 3, the high-risk AI system shall be provided to the user in such a way that the individuals to whom human oversight is assigned are enabled as appropriate and proportionate, to the circumstances and in accordance with industry standards:
Amendment 1832 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) fulto be aware of and sufficiently understand the capacities and limitations of the high-risk AI system and be able to duly monitor its operation, so that signs of anomalies, dysfunctions and unexpected performance can be detected and addressed as soon as possible;
Amendment 1841 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 14 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) to be able to intervene on the operation of the high-risk AI system, halt or interrupt the system through a “stop” button or a similar procedurewhere reasonable and technically feasible and except if the human interference increases the risks or would negatively impact the performance in consideration of generally acknowledged state-of-the-art.
Amendment 1850 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve, in the light of their intended purpose and to the extent that can be reasonably expected and is in accordance with relevant industry standards, an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity, and perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle.
Amendment 1856 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systemsrange of expected performance and the operational factors that affect that performance shall be declared in the accompanying instructions of use.
Amendment 1858 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. High-risk AI systems shall be resilientdesigned and developed with safety and security-by-design mechanism so that they achieve, in the light of their intended purpose, an appropriate level of cyber resilience as regards to errors, faults or inconsistencies that may occur within the system or the environment in which the system operates, in particular due to their interaction with natural persons or other systems.
Amendment 1863 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
High-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service shall be developed in such a way to ensure that possibly biased outputs due to outputs used as aninfluencing input for future operations (‘feedback loops’) are duly addressed with appropriate mitigation measures.
Amendment 1902 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) upon reasoned request of a national competent authority, provide the relevant information and documentation to demonstrate the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title.
Amendment 1914 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems shall put a quality management system in place that ensures compliance with this Regulation. That system shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures andor instructions, and shall include at least the following aspects:
Amendment 1916 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 1921 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 1934 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) the handling of communication with national competent authorities, competent authorities, including sectoral ones, providing or supporting the access to data, notified bodies, other operators, customers or other interested parties;
Amendment 1935 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point k
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point k
Amendment 1969 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Providers of high-risk AI systems shall, upon request by a national competent authority, provide that authority with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, in an official Union language determined by the Member State concerned. Upon a reasoned request from a national competent authority, providers shall also give that authority access to the logs automatically generated by the high- risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under their control by virtue of a contractual arrangement with the user or otherwise by law. Any information submitted in accordance with the provision of this article shall be considered by the national competent authority a trade secret of the company that is submitting such information and kept strictly confidential.
Amendment 2018 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Upon a reasoned request from a national competent authority, distributors of high-risk AI systems shall provide that authority with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a high-risk system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title. Distributors shall also cooperate with that national competent authority on any action taken by that authorityregarding its activities pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 4.
Amendment 2059 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 29 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Users of high-risk AI systems shall keep the logs automatically generated by that high-risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under their control. The logs shall be kept for a period that is appropriate in the light of industry standards, the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system and applicable legal obligations under Union or national law.
Amendment 2076 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 6 b (new)
Article 29 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. The obligations established by this Article shall not apply to users who use the AI system in the course of a personal non-professional activity.
Amendment 2133 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. Where harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 do not exist and are not expected to be published within a reasonable period or where the Commission considers that the relevant harmonised standards are insufficient or that there is a need to address specific safety or fundamental right concerns, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt common specifications in respect of the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 74(2).
Amendment 2138 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 41 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. When deciding to draft and adopt common specifications, the Commission shall consult the Board, the European standardisation organisations as well as the relevant stakeholders, and duly justify why it decided not to use harmonised standards. The abovementioned organisations shall be regularly consulted while the Commission is in the process of drafting the common specifications.
Amendment 2141 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 2
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, when preparing the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, shall gather the views of stakeholders, including SMEs and start- ups, relevant bodies or expert groups established under relevant sectorial Union law.
Amendment 2149 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 4
Article 41 – paragraph 4
4. Where providers of high-risk AI systems do not comply with the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, they shall duly justify that they have adopted technical solutions that are at least equivalent thereto.
Amendment 2150 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 41 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. If harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 are developed and the references to them are published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 in the future, the relevant common specifications shall no longer apply.
Amendment 2191 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 43 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. High-risk AI systems that have already been subject to a conformity assessment procedure shall undergo a new conformity assessment procedure whenever they are substantially modified, regardless of whetherif the modified system is intended to be further distributed or continues to be used by the current user.
Amendment 2193 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 43 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
For high-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service, changes to the high-risk AI system and its performance that have been pre-determined by the provider at the moment of the initial conformity assessment and are part of the information contained in the technical documentation referred to in point 2(f) of Annex IV, shall not constitute a substantial modification. The same should apply to updates of the AI system for security reasons in general and to protect against evolving threats of manipulation of the system as long as the update does not include significant changes to the functionality of the system.
Amendment 2201 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 5
Article 43 – paragraph 5
5. TAfter consulting the AI Board referred to in Article 56 and after providing substantial evidence, followed by thorough consultation and the involvement of the affected stakeholders, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 for the purpose of updating Annexes VI and Annex VII in order to introduce elements of the conformity assessment procedures that become necessary in light of technical progress.
Amendment 2208 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 6
Article 43 – paragraph 6
Amendment 2232 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1
Article 49 – paragraph 1
1. The physical CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the high-risk AI system, it shall be affixed to the packaging or to the accompanying documentation, as appropriate.
Amendment 2234 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. A digital CE marking may be used instead of or additionally to the physical marking if it can be accessed via the display of the product or via a machine- readable code or other electronic means.
Amendment 2271 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Users of an AI system that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, objects, places or other entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful (‘deep fake’), shall disclose, in an appropriate, clear and visible manner, that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated.
Amendment 2294 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. AI regulatory sandboxes established by one or more Member States competent authorities or the European Data Protection Supervisorthe European Commission, one or more Member States, or other competent entities shall provide a controlled environment that facilitates the development, testing and validation of innovative AI systems for a limited time before their placement on the market or putting into service pursuant to a specific plan. This shall take place under the direct supervision and guidance by the competent authorities with a view to ensuringin collaboration with and guidance by the European Commission or the competent authorities in order to identify risks to health and safety and fundamental rights, test mitigation measures for identified risks, demonstrate prevention of these risks and otherwise ensure compliance with the requirements of this Regulation and, where relevant, other Union and Member States legislation supervised within the sandbox.
Amendment 2329 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 5
Article 53 – paragraph 5
5. The European Commission, Member States’ competent authorities and other entities that have established AI regulatory sandboxes shall coordinate their activities and cooperate within the framework of the European Artificial Intelligence Board. They shall submit annual reports to the Board and the CommissionCommission’s AI Regulatory Sandboxing programme. The European Commission shall submit annual reports to the European Artificial Intelligence Board on the results from the implementation of those scheme, including good practices, lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the application of this Regulation and other Union legislation supervised within the sandbox.
Amendment 2340 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 53 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The Commission shall establish an EU AI Regulatory Sandboxing Programme whose modalities referred to in Article 53(6) shall cover the elements set out in Annex IXa. The Commission shall proactively coordinate with national, regional and also local authorities, as relevant.
Amendment 2372 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – title
Article 55 – title
Measures for small-scale providerSMEs, start-ups and users
Amendment 2375 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups with priority access to the AI regulatory sandboxes to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions;
Amendment 2377 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) organise specific awareness raising activities about the application of this Regulation tailored to the needs of the small-scale providerSMEs, sart-ups and users;
Amendment 2379 #
2021/0106(COD)
(c) where appropriate, establish a dedicated channel for communication with small-scale providers andSMEs, start-ups, users and other innovators to provide guidance and respond to queries about the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 2381 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) support SME's increased participation in the standardisation development process;
Amendment 2387 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 2
Article 55 – paragraph 2
2. The specific interests and needs of the small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups shall be taken into account when setting the fees for conformity assessment under Article 43, reducing those fees proportionately to their size and market size.
Amendment 2405 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Board shall provide advice and assistance to the Commission and to the national supervisory authorities in order to:
Amendment 2414 #
2021/0106(COD)
(c a) contribute to the effective cooperation with the competent authorities of third countries and with international organisations.
Amendment 2464 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 4
Article 57 – paragraph 4
4. The Board may invite external experts and observers to attend its meetings and may hold exchanges with interested third parties to inform its activities to an appropriate extent. To that end t, and hold consultations with relevant stakeholders and ensure appropriate participation. The Commission may facilitate exchanges between the Board and other Union bodies, offices, agencies and advisory. The Commission may facilitate exchanges between the Board and other Union bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups.
Amendment 2484 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
When providing advice and assistance to the Commission and to the national supervisory authorities in the context of Article 56(2), the Board shall in particular:
Amendment 2589 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 7
Article 59 – paragraph 7
7. National competent authorities may provide guidance and advice on the implementation of this Regulation, including to small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups. Whenever national competent authorities intend to provide guidance and advice with regard to an AI system in areas covered by other Union legislation, the competent national authorities under that Union legislation shall be consulted, as appropriate. Member States mayshall also establish one central contact point for communication with operators and other stakeholders.
Amendment 2593 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 8
Article 59 – paragraph 8
8. When Union institutions, agencies and bodies fall within the scope of this Regulation, the European Data Protection Supervisor shall act as the competent authority for their supervision and coordination.
Amendment 2643 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 2
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. The post-market monitoring system shall actively and systematically collect, document and analyse relevant data provided by users or collected through other sources, to the extent such data are readily accessible to the provider and taking into account the limits resulting from data protection, copyright and competition law, on the performance of high- risk AI systems throughout their lifetime, and allow the provider to evaluate the continuous compliance of AI systems with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2.
Amendment 2648 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 3
Article 61 – paragraph 3
3. The post-market monitoring system shall be based on a post-market monitoring plan. The post-market monitoring plan shall be part of the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV. The Commission shall adopt an implementing act laying down detailed provisions establishing a template for the post-market monitoring plan and the list of elements to be included in the plan by ... [12 months following the entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 2664 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 62 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
No report under this Article is required if the serious incident also leads to reporting requirements under other laws. In that case, the authorities competent under those laws shall forward the received report to the national competent authority.
Amendment 2689 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2
Article 64 – paragraph 2
2. WhereMarket surveillance authorities shall be granted access to the source code of the high-risk AI system upon a reasoned request and only when the following cumulative conditions are fulfilled: a) Access to source code is necessary to assess the conformity of thea high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2, and upon a reasoned request, the market surveillance authorities shall be granted access to the source code of the AI system. b) testing/auditing procedures and verifications based on the data and documentation provided by the provider have been exhausted or proved insufficient.
Amendment 2729 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 65 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) a failure of the high-risk AI system to meet requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2;
Amendment 2769 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 2
Article 68 – paragraph 2
2. Where the non-compliance referred to in paragraph 1 persists, the Member State concerned shall take all appropriate and proportionate measures to restrict or prohibit the high- risk AI system being made available on the market or ensure that it is recalled or withdrawn from the market.
Amendment 2772 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 a (new)
Article 68 a (new)
Amendment 2779 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 b (new)
Article 68 b (new)
Article 68 b Right to an effective judicial remedy against a national supervisory authority 1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a national supervisory authority concerning them. 2. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the national supervisory authority does not handle a complaint, does not inform the complainant on the progress or preliminary outcome of the complaint lodged within three months pursuant to Article 68a(3) or does not comply with its obligation to reach a final decision on the complaint within six months pursuant to Article 68a(4) or its obligations under Article 65. 3. Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the national supervisory authority is established.
Amendment 2793 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 4
Article 69 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission and the Board shall take into account the specific interests and needs of the small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups when encouraging and facilitating the drawing up of codes of conduct.
Amendment 2796 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. National competent authorities and, notified bodies involved in the application of this Regulation shall respect, the Commission, the Board, and any other natural or legal person involved in the application of this Regulation shall, in accordance with Union or national law, put appropriate technical and organisational measures in place to ensure the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities in such a manner as to protect, in particular:
Amendment 2803 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Amendment 2821 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
Article 71 – paragraph 1
1. In compliance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including administrative fines, applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. They shall take into particular account the size and interests of small-scale providerSMEs and start-ups and their economic viability.
Amendment 2830 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 71 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The following infringementsNon-compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 320 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 64 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, and in case of SMEs and start-ups, up to 3% of its worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher: . .
Amendment 2848 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 4
Article 71 – paragraph 4
4. The grossly negligent non- compliance by the provider or the user of the AI s ystem with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Articles 5 and 10, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 210 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 42 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
Amendment 2866 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 71 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) the size, the annual turnover and market share of the operator committing the infringement;
Amendment 2881 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 71 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Amendment 2962 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 2
Article 83 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to the high-risk AI systems, other than the ones referred to in paragraph 1, that have been placed on the market or put into service before [date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)], only if, from that date, those systems are subject to significant changesubstantial modification in their design or intended purpose as defined in Article 3(23) .
Amendment 3001 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2
Article 85 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply from [248 months following the entering into force of the Regulation].
Amendment 3007 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 85 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall not until... [24 months after the date of application of this Regulation] impede the making available of AI systems and products which were placed on the market inconformity with Union harmonisation legislation before [the date of application of this Regulation].
Amendment 3008 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 85 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 3045 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – title
Annex III – title
Amendment 3059 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used for the ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification of natural persons; , excluding verification/authentification systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises;
Amendment 3108 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used formake autonomous decisions or materially influence decisions about recruitment or selection of natural persons, notably for advertising vacancies, screening or filtering applications, evaluating candidates in the course of interviews or tests;
Amendment 3118 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
(b) AI intended to be used for makingmake autonomous decisions or materially influence decisions on promotion and termination of work- related contractual relationships, for task allocation and for monitoring and evaluating performance and behavior of persons in such relationships.
Amendment 3136 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
(b) AI systems intended to be used to evaluate the creditworthiness of natural persons or establish their credit score, with the exception of AI systems put into service by small scale providerSMEs and start-ups for their own use;
Amendment 3279 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 5
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 5
5. A description of relevanyt changes made by providers to the system through its lifecycle;
Amendment 3312 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IX a (new)
Annex IX a (new)
Amendment 109 #
2020/2263(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Believes that rationalisation designed to achieve a uniform VAT system must at the same time take into account the historical application of reduced rates targeted at strategic sectors; stresses in this connection, the importance of appropriate tax treatment for equestrian and equine activities in the broad sense;
Amendment 19 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the fiscal system must be reformed if the state is to continuemeasures to establishing the preconditions for inclusive and sustainable well-being require proportional and targeted adaptations in the fiscal system;
Amendment 37 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 81 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that COVID-19 has given the EU a unique chance for a proper and holistic analysis of tax systems, how individual taxes interact and how they can be better coordinated to produce more flexible, resilient, green and fairer tax systems; recommends that Member States take this opportunity to build a new social-fiscal contract with citizens; underlines that this will help not only with raising revenues, but also with building trust and accountability between citizens and the state; stresses the need for coordination at EU level to avoid distortions and subsequent revenue losses;
Amendment 155 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes with concern that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is highly regressive, with the poorest households being the most severely hit14 ; regrets that large companies that realise excess profits, such as e-commerce businesses and wealthy individuals who realise significant capital gains through speculation, are often undertaxedcalls the need to find a fair and proportionate taxation for multinational enterprises that are even benefiting from the current crisis and a new normal in the digital sphere; _________________ 14OECD, ‘Tax and Fiscal Policy in Response to the Coronavirus Crisis: Strengthening Confidence and Resilience’, 19 May 2020,https://www.oecd.org/ctp/tax- policy/tax-and-fiscal-policy-in-response- to-the-coronavirus-crisis-strengthening- confidence-and-resilience.htm
Amendment 187 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Warns that national budgets cannot rely on environmental taxes alone, as some of these revenues will fall as environmental harm decreases over time; calls on Member States to develop holistic tax reforms, shifting taxation from labour to not only pollution but also capital and wealth16 ; _________________ 16European Commission, ‘Tax policies in the European Union’ survey, 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/busi ness/company-tax/tax-good- governance/european-semester/tax- policies-european-union-survey_en; calls on Member States to develop holistic tax reforms, installing a fair and transparent tax system making everyone pay a fair share;
Amendment 215 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. WelcomesTakes note of initiatives taken by the Commission within the framework of the Green Deal; notes with concern that no clear and holistic guidance exists on how taxation should contribute to achieving the goals set out in the Green Deal and considers that the taxation syhe costs of the implementation of the green deal is to be shouldered, particularly by SMEs, in particular with a view on the large bureaucratic burden that not at last em should therefore be reformederges due to the Taxonomy regulation;
Amendment 234 #
2020/2259(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. WelcomesTakes note of the Commission’s soon- to-be-published revision of the Energy Taxation Directive17 ; callhighlights oin Member States to agree to clthe context of proposed tax exemptions for aviation and maritime fuels, increase minimum rates and restore the level playing field; callsand transport taxes the potential onf the ComEmission to launch a proposal for a progressive European kerosene taxs Trading System (ETS) that should include transportation (comprehending maritime and road transport); _________________ 17 OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51.
Amendment 47 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Commission’s decision to carry out initiatives aimed at enhancing cooperation among tax authorities and increased harmoniscoordination of procedural rules across the single market is of the highest importance; welcomes the Commission’s initiative for the ‘EU cooperative compliance programme’;
Amendment 80 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the Union decision- making process is not promoting change, as tax policy is a national prerogative and subject to unanimity; regrets that the current situation sometimes leads to an uneven or inconsistent application of tax regulations; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure more harmonised and consistent tax rules and their implementation, to protect the functioning of the single market and to assure the principle of “taxing where profit is generated”;
Amendment 88 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes note of the existing limits on decision making in the Council and calls for exploring all legal options as provided in the Treaties on taxation especially in order to ensure functionality of the single market and preserve Union competitiveness in the global market;on taxation matters in the Council.
Amendment 147 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the two-pillar agreement reached at the G7/G20 levels on the allocation of taxing rights and the application of a minimum effective tax rate of at least 15% on the global profits of MNEs; notes the need for effective implementation; calls on the Commission to make the necessary legislative proposals to implement the agreement, namely on PILLAR II, into Union law as quickly as possible after the finalisation of the technical work on the OECD approach;
Amendment 185 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – Part B – Recommendation B1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex I – Part B – Recommendation B1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The European Parliament calls on the European Commission to analyse the extent of the problem and if necessary to bring forward initiatives to ensure a more consistent determination of tax residency within the Single Market by 2022.
Amendment 5 #
2020/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 22 March 2019 on "Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness",
Amendment 77 #
2020/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the adoption of a Temporary Framework for State aid measureand its amendements established in response to the COVID-19 crisis in order to enable Member States to support companies during the pandemic; stresses the need for the Commission to support efforts for a green and digital recovery in the on-going review of State aid rules;
Amendment 212 #
2020/2223(INI)
17. Takes the view that new competition tools might be needed to deal with structural competition problems across digital markets which current rules cannot address in the most effective manner; stresses the role of the European Competition Network to share best practices in this regard;
Amendment 301 #
2020/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 c (new)
Paragraph 27 c (new)
27 c. Supports the carbon border adjustment mechanism to prevent carbon leakage as it helps ensure a level playing field between producers inside and outside the EU, and enhance transition to climate neutral modes of productions;
Amendment 325 #
2020/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Recalls that cartels represent some of the most serious violations of competition law and monopolies the most concerning form of market concentration that the European Union has been seeking to break down by sector-specific regulation and competition law enforcement;
Amendment 4 #
2020/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Highlights the role of the Undertaking in contributing to the objectives of the European Green Deal; welcomes in this respect, the research and innovation efforts of the Shift2Rail to achieve more sustainable, digital, competitive, reliable and attractive railway system to Europe;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Believes that the successor of the Shift2Rail should include in the research programme joint work with other modes of transport to pave the way towards seamless and integrated transport;
Amendment 6 #
2020/2188(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Stresses the resilience of the rail sector and its contribution to maintaining the supply chain during the COVID-19 outbreak; believes however, that the rail sector will not be able to compete on the transport market, without further automation and digitalisation; calls on the Shift2Rail successor to take this challenge as one of its priorities;
Amendment 3 #
2020/2184(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls the essential role played by the Undertaking to ensure net accelerations in green technologies aiming at reducing CO2 gas emissions and noise levels produced by aircrafts; believes that its successor, Clean Aviation, will play important role ensuring aviation sector's involvement in the European Green Deal;
Amendment 10 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates its support to the addition of a pillar of military mobility to TEN-T policy with adoption of the Action Plan in March 2018; regrets that the proposal by the Commission and European Parliament to include a new envelope dedicated to military mobility needs of EUR 6,5 billion under the CEF budget for 2021-2027 has been drastically reduced; notes the importance of increasing our capacities to react to emergency situations that military mobility could support;
Amendment 11 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission to further develop its mechanism and tools enabling awareness and information to citizens and stakeholders on the tourism and transport projects it funds under the European Regional development Fund and cohesion Funds”
Amendment 14 #
2020/2140(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates the Parliament’s request for the creation of a new budgetary line for Tourism, to support this sector severely hit by the Covid-19 crisisin order to finance a tourism fit for the future, digitalized and sustainable; welcomes that the Court has launched an audit to assess tourism projects co-funded with EUR 6.4 billion in 2007-2013 and EUR 4 billion so far in 2014-2020 ERDF and Cohesion Fund money, which will help improving EU Tourism policies;
Amendment 72 #
2020/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the EIB’s rapid mobilisation of up to EUR 40 billion of emergency financing to fight the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, through the setting up of loans, credit holidays and measures to alleviate the liquidity of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and mid-caps; highlights the importance of supporting SMEs, as the COVID-19 pandemic is particularly hard for these companies; underlines that robust support for SMEs is key for economic growth and to recover from the economic debt crisis;
Amendment 73 #
2020/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes, in addition, the subsequent creation of the EUR 25 billion European Guarantee Fund (EGF) in response to the COVID-19 crisis, not least its positive impact in providing financial support to SMEs and the health sector; suggests that the EGF should remain operational beyond 2021 given the prolonged impact of the Covid-19 crisis and the repeated lockdowns in many Member States; deems it of the utmost importance to step up such initiatives to ensure that funds are reaching the real economy;
Amendment 132 #
2020/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that investment in innovation, infrastructure and skills are crucial elements to recover from the economic and social crisis, ensure sustainable growth and create high-quality jobs and long-term competitiveness; highlights the importance of the EIB’s role in the success of the InvestEU Programme in the post-pandemic recovery;
Amendment 139 #
2020/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Regrets the Council’s rejection of the Commission’s proposal for a Solvency Support Instrument and stresses the importance of supporting companies that, in the absence of the Covid-19 pandemic, would otherwise be thriving;
Amendment 203 #
2020/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Welcomes the EIB’s internal review and revision of its Anti-Fraud Policy and its intentions to elevate the policy to the group level, thereby applying to both the EIB and the EIF; urges the EIB to take an ambitious and broad approach to this review; stresses the importance of the EIB’s anti-fraud investigative office to have robust competences, sufficient resources and independence; calls on the EIB to enhance its cooperation with OLAF and the EPPO;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission communication of 3 March 2021 entitled ‘One year since the outbreak of COVID- 19: fiscal policy response’ and takes note of the proposed conditions for deactivating the general escape clause (GEC); highlightsagrees with the Commission that deactivation of the GEC should be conditional upon the health, social and economic sbased on an overall assessment of the state of the economy based on quantituation across Member States in order to ensure that fiscal support is provided for as long as neededve criteria; agrees that economic activity compared to pre-crisis levels should be the key criterion;
Amendment 220 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to relaunch the debate on the reformview of the economic governance of the Union within the existing framework with a view to coming forward with a legislative proposal by the end of 2021; calls for a rethink of EU fiscal rules within the existing framework, also in view of the legacies of the pandemic, and supports the EFB’s conclusion that the fiscal framework has to be adapted;
Amendment 295 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 331 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Agrees withTakes note of the opinion of the EFB and others21 that a deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) would be helped by a central fiscal capacity, which could help cushion idiosyncratic shocks, whether common or country-specific, in a timely manner; however, calls on the Commission and Member States to first monitor and evaluate the implementation of the NGEU before considering an additional fiscal capacity; _________________ 21International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank.
Amendment 355 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses the importance of the MIP in identifying and taking preventive and corrective actions against emerging imbalances and competitiveness losses at an early stage; points out, however, that the potential of this mechanism has not been fully exploited on account of its structural weaknesses;
Amendment 431 #
2020/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. RecallsTakes note of its position23 that an ‘additional budgetary capacity for the euro area’ should be included in the fiscal capacity; however, calls on the Commission and Member States to first monitor and evaluate the implementation of the NGEU before considering an additional financial capacity; _________________ 23European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 on budgetary capacity for the euro area, OJ C 252, 18.7.2018, p. 235.
Amendment 28 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to enhance their cooperation in order to improve the medical supply and distribution chain through better visibility and efficient monitoring, particularly on cross-especially on "green lane" border croutessings, and to establish corridors where medical supplies have priority of deliverycalls on Member States to implement the Green Lanes under the Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services without unnecessary restrictions across borders;
Amendment 34 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Highlights that the air freight is a crucial part of the pharmaceutical supply chain; and therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to create dedicated hubs in the Union to build receiving points of air freight of medicines, active pharmaceutical ingredients and medical equipment insufficient capacity in order to cover needs of the supply chain as well as creating open routes between the Union and third countries for these essential goods; calls on the Member States to encourage cargo and express airlines to apply reasonable shipping rates for medical and emergency supplies;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to adopt strategic plans to upgrade their existing infrastructure for an efficient supply of medicines; deems it necessary to remove bottlenecks, boost intermodality (while favouring the shift to rail), finance the main hubs (ports, airports and intermodal platforms), and enhance the delivery of various types of goods, including dangerous goods crucial for the production of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry, in close cooperation with the Commission and with all interested stakeholders involved, to take coordinated measures and to adopt strategic plans to upgrade their existing infrastructure for an efficient supply of medicines; including by foreseeing the creation of European common strategic reserves, building on rescEU stockpile's initiative; deems it necessary to remove bottlenecks, boost intermodality, finance the main hubs, and enhance the delivery of various types of goods, including dangerous goods crucial for the production of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry; calls on the Member States to ensure that medical facilities and medical staff in place are reinforced, in order tobe able to carry out the increasing traffic volumes while restrictions are lifted;
Amendment 49 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Welcomes the contribution of the armed forces of Member States to the supply chain of medicines and protective equipment during the COVID-19 outbreak; therefore, calls on the Commission and the Member States, in close cooperation with the European Medicines Agency, to enhance the cooperation for the use of national military resources, where available and necessary, to assist the supply chain of medicines and protective equipments among Member States, as part of PESCO cooperation framework;
Amendment 54 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the importance of IT systems in facilitating the exchange of information between the various actors involved in the transport logistics chain, including the customs authorities, with a view to optimising the distribution of medicines in the Member States and planning supply times more efficiently; calls on the Commission to carefully evaluate the benefits as well as the risks that artificial intelligence may bring for the fast and reliable delivery of medical supplies;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the importance of guaranteeing high safety standards for both transport infrastructure, for transport workers and employees, making it possible to manage significant volumes in the supply chain without disruptions or posing risks to healthf the supply chains and without prejudice for the competent authorities to take proportionate and adapted measures to minimise the risks of contagion; furthermore, notes the importance of the careful management of the ambient and cold-chain warehouse capacity in inbound and outbound transport infrastructure and, if necessary, the introduction of emergency or self- certification of additional capacity of pharmaceutical products;
Amendment 74 #
2020/2071(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the COVID-19 outbreak has laid bare the weaknessighlighted the importance of cooperation and solidarity between Member States ofin the Europeanfield of medical production systemand supply, highlighting the importance of delivering medicines swiftly in urgent and exceptional circumstances that could arise in the future.
Amendment 103 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Commission’s amended MFF proposal of 27 and 28 May, including the communication entitled ‘Europe’s moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation’, with its provision to increase funding for the Common Agricultural Policy in comparison to the previous MFF proposal;
Amendment 106 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 233 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the proposal to top up the Just Transition Fund (JTF), including with additional funds from Next Generation EU, and the two additional pillars of the Just Transition Mechanism, namely a dedicated scheme under InvestEU and a public sector loan facility, which will contribute to allevi and stresses that ing the economic effects of the transition to climate neutrality on the order for the JTF and green transition to be successful and impactful for agriculture and rural areas, it moust vulnerable regions in the EU; be undertaken in a fair, inclusive and scientifically underpinned manner together with stakeholders;
Amendment 241 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Takes note of the Commission communication on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan(COM(2020)0021), but emphasizes that the elements proposed within it, including the Just Transition Fund, depend entirely on an ambitious MFF agreement; expresses its deep concern that the front-loading of EU budget funds to cover new spending requirements stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic may result in a funds shortage in later programming years which may impact on the ability of the agriculture sector to deliver on the objectives and ambition of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies and deprive EU farmers of funding in the latter years of the MFF, which would be particularly damaging if they are expected to comply with new obligations under the Green Deal;
Amendment 244 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls that transitioning to a climate-neutral economy will be particularly demanding for those Member States that rely heavily on fossil fuels which initially might require phasing out through natural gas production, or on greenhouse gas intensive industrial activities which need to be phased out or which need to adapt due to the transition towards climate neutrality; Calls on the Commission to ensure that the distribution of the JTF financial means reflects the capacity of Member States to finance the necessary investments to cope with the transition towards climate neutrality;
Amendment 255 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the role of InvestEU in the implementation and functioning of the SEIP and considers that it should be at the heart of the Union’s green, fair and resilient recovery; welcomes, therefore, the Commission’s proposal to increase the programme’s size and scope; welcomes the proposal to create a Strategic Investment Facility within InvestEU to promote sustainable investments in key technologies and value chains; calls on the Commission to carry out a thorough impact assessment for the upcoming delegated acts on climate change mitigation &adaptation to ensure that they are “fit for purpose” to be applied to the InvestEU programme and public procurement;
Amendment 296 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reaffirms its previous position regarding candidates for new own resources, and calls oninvites the Commission to propose new own resources which correspond to essential EU objectives including the fight against climate change and the protection of the environment; asks, therefore, for the introduction of new own resources based on the auction revenues of the Emissions Trading System, a contribution on non-recycled plastic packaging waste, the future Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base or a precursor based on operations of large enterprises, a tax on digital companies, and a financial transaction taxexplore avenues for introduction of such potential new own resources which correspond to essential EU objectives;
Amendment 365 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Amendment 368 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Stress that the differing starting points and potential for development of different regions and Member States must be taken into consideration in the development of national plans, allocation of funding and in the longer term financial perspective;
Amendment 383 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Recalls that a significant percentage of the common agricultural policy (CAP) envelope will be used to support environmental and climate- related objectives and requirements; recalls that the reform of the CAP is still ongoing and discussions are underway concerning these environmental and climate-related objectives and requirements;
Amendment 470 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to ensure “transitional activities ” that enable significant improvements towards decarbonisation, reduction in environmental footprint, or improved resource efficiency in key sectors of the economy are eligible to receive funding under the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan;
Amendment 471 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Highlights that the European economy is comprised largely out of micro-enterprises and SMEs; therefore urges the Commission to give special attention to these types of enterprises, e.g. by providing a better access to funding and retraining of employees;
Amendment 486 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls that the European Semester is a framework for EU Member States to coordinate their budgetary and economic policies; believes that it could facilitate the implementation of the European Green Deal, the European Pillar of Social Rights and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); believes that social impact investments create a balanced socio- economic transition that avoids creating or furthering the risks of social precarity or an unstable business environment; believes that the SDGs should be at the heart of EU’s policy making process;
Amendment 543 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Invites the Commission to revise the Energy Tax Directive and coordinate a kerosene tax that could also feed into the EU budgetdiscussion on other possible types of measures regarding the energy and transport sectors;
Amendment 13 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas international agreements allowing Europol and third countries to cooperate and exchange personal data should respect Articles 2, 6, 7 and 8 of the Charter, and Article 16 TFEU, and be necessary for and proportionate to the fulfilment of Europol’s tasks; respecting the principle of purpose limitation, the right of access, the right to rectification and the control by an independent authority specifically stipulated by the Charter;
Amendment 19 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas on 13th May 2020 the Council adopted the Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations with New Zealand for an agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on the exchange of personal data between the Europol and the New Zealand authorities competent for fighting serious crime and terrorism through a written procedure with all delegations voting in favour;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that, since Europol recogniszes that thee overall terrorist threat level from returning foreign freedom fighters, radicalised European Muslims and their families ito the security of the EU as high, it is essential for information exchange by all relevant law enforcement agencies, within the EU and globally, to be prioritised in order to fight serious crime and terrorism; therefore urgesrecalls that the Member States to work faster to secure their bordershave a key role to play in securing external borders of the EU in full compliance with Schengen code;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Requests that the agreement contain the necessary safeguards and controls with respect to the protection of personal data as enshrined in the Article 16 TFEU;
Amendment 59 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is of the opinion that, in line with the principle of purpose limitation, the future agreement should explicitly lay down a list of criminal offences in relation to which personal data can be exchanged; considers that this list should include the activities covered by such crimes, and the persons, groups and organisations likely to be affected by such transfers; considers that transferred personal data should be related to individual cases;
Amendment 71 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the independent supervisory body should also have the power to decide to suspend or terminate the agreement in the event of a breach; considers that under the agreement, authorities should be allowed to continue to process any personal data falling within the scope of the agreement transferred prior to its suspension or termination; considerbelieves that a procedure for monitoring and periodically evaluating the agreement should be established in order to evaluate the partners’ compliance with the agreementmonitoring mechanism should be included in the agreement and that the agreement should be subject to periodic assessments to evaluate its functioning in relation to the operational needs of Europol as well as its compliance with European data protection rights and principles;
Amendment 74 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the international agreement should include a provision allowing the EU to suspend or revoke the agreement should there be a breach of personal data by a law enforcement authority; considers that the independent supervisory body should also have the power to decide to suspend or terminate the agreement in the event of a breach; considers that under the agreement, authorities should be allowed to continue to process any personal data falling within the scope of the agreement transferred prior to its suspension or termination; considers that a procedure for monitoring and periodically evaluating the agreement should be established in order to evaluate the partners’ compliance with the agreement;
Amendment 79 #
2020/2048(INI)
9. Considers that onward transfers of Europol information from competent New Zealand authorities to other authorities in New Zealand, including for use in judicial proceedings, should only be allowed for the original purposes of the transfer by Europol and should be made subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, including prior authorisation by Europol; points out that the same conditions should apply to onward transfers of Europol information from competent New Zealand authorities to third country authorities, with the additional requirement that data only be transferred to third countries to which Europol is entitled to transfer personal data on the basis of Article 25 (1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794 should not be allowed;
Amendment 89 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that the consent of the European Parliament to the conclusion of the agreement will be conditional upon satisfactory involvement of the European Parliament at all stages of the procedure in accordance with Article 218 TFEU;
Amendment 90 #
2020/2048(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to suspend or terminate the agreement at the request of a majority of the European Parliament;
Amendment 2 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication of 9 July 2020 entitled 'Getting ready for changes. Communication on readiness at the end of the transition period between the European Union and the United Kingdom' (COM(2020) 324),
Amendment 11 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas all actions taken to create a Capital Markets Union (CMU) should have as their core objectives improving the range of financing options offered to companies and citizens, as well as fostering the availability of a greater range of more attractive investment offers, as their objectiveto incentivise financial participation and to turn savers into investors; whereas access to equity financing for SMEs, entrepreneurs and the social economy has become even more crucial for the COVID-19 recovery;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the actions taken so far to achieve the CMU are moving in the right direction; whereas much work nevertheless remains to be done in terms of the precision, effectiveness and simplification of the measures adopted; whereas an ambitious vision for the CMU project is essential to overcome national sensitivities and build the momentum to complete the CMU;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the social and economic crisis resulting from COVID-19 will have a particularly negative impact on SMEs and retail savers; whereas the EU’s response to COVID-19 through the European Recovery Plan should provide a large injection of capital in order to increase European enterprises’ access to finance; whereas capital market financing is needed to increase the overall financing capacity and to reduce the reliance on bank lending in the EU;
Amendment 47 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the market movements resulting from COVID-19 have acted as a real-life “stress test” on the robustness of the whole financial ecosystem, and should be followed up with a detailed assessment of the benefits and shortcomings of the existing EU rulebook on financial stability and financial supervision;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the Capital Markets Union should be a key contributor to the transition towards a sustainable and resilient economy to complement public investment, in line with the EU Green Deal; whereas the EU should aim to consolidate its position as a global leader in sustainable finance with an ambitious model and rulebook for sustainable investments which should be promoted as part of the EU values and as the gold- standard on the international level;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas recent announcements from the UK authorities on future regulatory divergence confirm the need for a careful assessment, in each area on a forward-looking and on-going basis, of the risks for the EU in terms of financial stability, market transparency, market integrity, investor protection and level- playing field when granting and maintaining equivalence, due to the current interconnectedness between the EU and the United Kingdom markets;
Amendment 60 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C d (new)
Recital C d (new)
Cd. whereas financial stability and the integrity of the single market can only be preserved with a robust approach to third- countries access to the EU’s market and a dynamic monitoring system on equivalence regimes; whereas it is recalled that equivalence can only be granted if the regulatory and supervisory regime and standards of the relevant third-country are deemed fully equivalent by the Commission to those of the EU in order to ensure a level playing field;
Amendment 64 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C e (new)
Recital C e (new)
Amendment 69 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the removal of barriers, including the simplification of legislation where relevant and conducive to financial stability, to diversify funding sources for SMEstart-ups, SMEs and mid-caps, in order to promote SMEs’their ability to access equity markets, and to reduce the existing debt bias; points out that the current situation makes SMEs more fragile and vulnerablnotes that necessary measures include facilitating investment research, streamlining the definition of SMEs across relevant EU legislation, and easing issuance requirements to ensure that start-ups, SMEs and mid-caps find their way to public markets; calls on the Member States to rebalance debt-equity bias in taxation; points out that the current situation makes SMEs more fragile and vulnerable; calls on the introduction of an ‘SME test’ for impact assessments on each CMU initiative;
Amendment 113 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for a review of the ELTIF Regulation and of related prudential calibrations in the banking and insurance regulatory frameworks to enhance the take-up and attractiveness of this innovative European label; notes that creating of a new additional ELTIF regime, based on an open-ended fund structure with the possibility to redeem at set intervals, could offer a new opportunity for retail investors to benefit from a diversified portfolio of long-term investments;
Amendment 122 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Requests the Commission to assess how targeted amendments to the Securitisation Regulation could free up financing capacity; such targeted amendments could include the realignment of the treatment of cash and synthetic securitisations, of the treatment of regulatory capital and liquidity with that of covered bonds and loans, as well as with the disclosure and due diligence requirements for covered bonds and simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisation;
Amendment 127 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for targeted measures within securities market legislation tohat could help expedite the recovery after the COVID-19 crisis; supports as part of a broad package of measures to increase public and private financing; welcomes targeted changes in the Prospectus Regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID), and the Securitisation Regulation and the Market Abuse Regulations long as they aim to preserve market liquidity and transparency, and to facilitate investments in the real economy, in particular in SMEs, and tomid-caps; notes that, allowing newcomers and new products to enter the markets, preserving consumer protection and market integrity; incumbent market players to offer new innovative products while preserving consumer protection and market integrity, is one of the strongest assets of the EU single market;
Amendment 158 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Emphasises that innovative and competitive EU financial products with global reach, such as UCITS and green bonds using the future EU Green Bond Standard, are channels to extend the EU’s influence on the global stage and to strengthen the international role of the euro; calls on the Commission to draw inspiration from these examples, if necessary through amending the respective legislation, in order to bring the same level of international recognition to other EU financial products such as ELTIFs and STS securitisations, and prospective future instruments such as social bonds;
Amendment 188 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the Solvency 2 Directive requires a review by the end of 2020 and that the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) will provide technical advice to the Commission after consultations with different stakeholders; requests the Commission and EIOPA to consider adjusting the capital requirements for investments in equity and private debt, in particular of SMEs and mid-caps, to ensure that incentives for insurers and pension funds do not penalise equity investments; strongly calls on insurers and re-insurers to draw conclusions from the COVID-19 crisis, including on the coverage of pandemic-related risks; encourages the rapid phasing out of national exemptions and to the reduction of ‘gold-plating’ in national implementation of Solvency II, to foster harmonisation and integration of the EU insurance and re-insurance market;
Amendment 200 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need for European and national ssupervisory convergence to promote a common European model, highlights the crucial role of the European Supervisory aAuthorities to overcome their differences; calls for supervisory convergence to promote a common European model, guided by the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA),(ESAs) in facilitating this; recalls the additional competences given and structural changes made to the ESAs by the recently adopted Regulation (EU) 2019/2175; calls on the ESAs, together with the national supervisory authorities, to implement and exercise these changes as soon as possible to allow the ESAs to act swiftly to preserve financial stability and the orderly functioning and integrity of the market, and to reduce the existing obstacles to cross-border financial operations;
Amendment 214 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Observes that financial services regulation is a very complex undertaking, with regulation at international, European and national level; encourages all relevant actors to address this complexity to ensure the proportionality of financial regulation and to remove unnecessary administrative burdens; also notes that proportionality of financial regulation can sometimes lead to increased complexity, and calls on the Commission and Member States to commit to significant efforts to streamline and harmonise existing and future rules, by phasing out national exemptions as appropriate, and by preventing ‘gold- plating’ of EU law at national level; highlights that Regulations with clear timelines for transition and phasing out of existing regimes can build a smooth and steady path to regulatory convergence;
Amendment 219 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to present a detailed road map to strengthen the robustness of the financial ecosystem, drawing lessons from the benefits and the shortcomings of the existing EU rulebook on financial stability and financial supervision, identified during the COVID- 19 crisis; takes note of the recent recommendations from the ESRB, notably on liquidity risks arising from margin calls and liquidity risks in investment funds;
Amendment 226 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned that retail investors’ engagement with financial markets remains low; calls for measures to promote retail investments in view of the demographic challenges faced by the EU by increasing the participation of retail investors in capital markets through more attractive and appropriate personal pension products; calls on the Commission to put forward initiatives specifically targeting retail investors, including facilitating the development of independent web-based EU comparison tools, to help retail investors determine the most appropriate products in terms of risk, return on investment and value for their particular needs, and promoting incentives for ESG products and products typically associated with better value for money;
Amendment 236 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that access to financial markets should be possible for all enterprises under the ‘same business, same rules’ principle; notes that this principle is particularly relevant in the FinTech and financial innovation spaces, and that reciprocal access to financial data should be balanced with the need to have a level playing field across all providers and product types;
Amendment 241 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls the existence of different shortcomings in the legislation on packaged retail investment and insurance products (PRIIPs) that should be addressed in the next reviewas soon as possible, ahead of the application of the PRIIPs rules to UCITS products; expects that Level 2 PRIIPs legislation on the Key Investor Document to respect lwill be aligned with the Level 1 text, in particular in relation to the performance scenarproviding accurate, fair, clear and non-misleading pre- contractual informatiosn; regrets the delays in the adoption of Level 2 PRIIPs legislation that will overlap with the first review of PRIIPs, and which increases legal uncertainty and costs for stakeholdermarket participants, and could reduce understanding and confidence from retail investors; calls for a more fundamental review of rules applicable to the distribution of financial products across the entirety of the retail investment space, in particular under MiFID, IDD and PRIIPs, aiming to harmonise and streamline the EU rulebook as appropriate; notes that EU rules on consumer protection should be adapted to the green and the digital transformations and put the interest of the retail investor at the forefront, regardless of the different types of providers and products;
Amendment 316 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights that ‘sandboxes’ may be an adequate tool to enhance the innovation and competitiveness of the financial services sector; requests that the Commission create a pan-European ‘sandbox’ for financial servic provided that sufficient safeguards are in place to prevent potential threats to the integrity, transparency, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, and to the stability of the financial system; requests that the Commission draws upon the experience gained from the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) to assess whether a pan-European ‘sandbox’ for financial services would provide additional benefits for financial innovation; asserts that such a pan- European ‘sandbox’ should be established within the direct supervisory remit of the joint ESAs committee, in cooperation with relevant national supervisory authorities;
Amendment 327 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Reiterates that EU legislation provides for the possibility of considering third-country rules as equivalent based on a technical, proportional and risk-based analysis, and that such decisions should be taken through a delegated act; recalls that the EU can unilaterally withdraw any equivalence decision; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the ESAs, and where relevant with National Competent Authorities, to establish a dynamic monitoring system on equivalence regimes, in the case of third country regulatory and supervisory divergences which could entail potential risks for the EU in terms of financial stability, market transparency, market integrity, investor and consumer protection and level-playing field; highlights that the Commission should have emergency procedures in place to withdraw equivalence decisions in case of the need to swiftly act, bearing in mind the potential consequences of an emergency withdrawal of an equivalence decision;
Amendment 334 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Reiterates the need for a more streamlined and codified representation of the EU in multilateral organisations/bodies, following the European Parliament resolution of 12 April 2016 on the EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies; notes that promoting EU values and global competitiveness of the EU’s financial sector when making policy at European and international level is ever more crucial as the multilateral world order further polarises;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas stablecoins have the potential to become a widely used means of payment;
Amendment 44 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the People’s Bank of China is trialling a central bank digital currency (the DCEP); highlights that the potential global use of the DCEP could have implications for international trade and consumer protection;
Amendment 119 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that FinTech will be integral to the success of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) and encourages the Commission to consider how to harness the benefits of FinTech in driving forward capital market integration in the Union, in particular, the participation of retail investors;
Amendment 125 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the increased importance of monitoring and reviewing measures relating to the regulation of digital finance, particularly bearing in mind the increasing relevance of this sector as the world deals with the COVID- 19 pandemic;
Amendment 126 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Encourages the relevant authorities in the Union to assess the impact of the risks and benefits of the potential global use of the DCEP and its interdependency with China's national blockchain platform;
Amendment 137 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commissionommends the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) in April 2019; Calls on the Commission to draw upon the knowledge and experience derived from the EFIF and to act as first mover in order to create a favourable environment for European FinTech hubs and firms to scale up;
Amendment 146 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Stresses that lawmeasures taken should ensure that market players, from small to large, have the regulatory space to innovate and that regulation and supervision in the area of FinTech should be based on the following principles:
Amendment 171 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that Union level measuresmeasures adopted at EU level should not stifle opportunities for businesses to grow and develop within the Union and beyond;
Amendment 173 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes the continually evolving methods used for money laundering and terrorist financing; emphasises, therefore, the need for the Commission’s approach to digital finance to be cognisant of this and sufficiently robust to combating ML/TF;
Amendment 202 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that developing a pan- European taxonomy for crypto-assets is desirable as a step towards fostering a common understanding, facilitating collaboration across jurisdictions and providing greater regulatory certainty for market participants engaged in cross border activity; recommends taking into account the importance of international cooperation and global initiatives as regards frameworks for crypto-assets, bearing in mind in particular their borderless nature; cautionproposes, however, that developing an open-ended taxonomy template may be more appropriate for this evolving market segment;
Amendment 204 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises that such an open taxonomy must be based on common understandings of the various crypto- assets involved; requests, therefore that the definitions of crypto-assets and their subclasses be harmonised across EU and member states;
Amendment 206 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses that any definition of crypto-assets must take into account future evolution of the crypto-asset market;
Amendment 207 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Points out that, at this stage, the use of stablecoins is not yet prominent within the Union; highlights the need for any future stablecoin-specific framework to be born out of the coming crypto-asset framework, representing an evolution of the legislation with the aim of offering the similar level of security as existing means of payments; believes that before any framework for stablecoins is developed, the architecture of this form of crypto- asset must be examined thoroughly;
Amendment 272 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to propose legislative changes in the area of ICT and cyber security requirements for the Union financial sector in order to address any inconsistencies, gaps and loopholes that are found to exist in relevant law; in this regard, calls on the Commission to consider the need to have a supervisory overview of the ICT providers, noting the concentration and contagions risks that can be posed by a heavy reliance by the financial services sector on a small number of ICT and cloud computing providers;
Amendment 280 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – point a
Paragraph 16 – point a
a. modernisation of ICT governance and risk management;
Amendment 288 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation at international fora in order to facilitate the development of international standards as regards cloud computing and out-sourcing; points out that international standards developed in these areas could then be adopted into an EU-specific framework in order to bring oversight of cloud computing and outsourcing into line with the level of oversight of legacy systems;
Amendment 297 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls that the collection and analysis of data play a central role for FinTech, and therefore highlights the need for consistent, technology-neutral application of existing data laws; highlights that Artificial Intelligence is one of the key technologies as regards enhancing the Union's competitiveness on a global level;
Amendment 301 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses that the free flow of data within the EU is needed to scale up innovative finance; points out that cross- border data flows, including to and from third countries, must be monitored and governed by EU legislative principles on data privacy and data protection;
Amendment 306 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Requests, in this regard, that the Commission examines how to ensure that digital finance entities can access on an equitable basis relevant and useful data, to help ensure thatfoster the potential of digital finance and to provide the opportunities for innovative FinTech businesses canto grow within the Union and beyond;
Amendment 309 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Amendment 316 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Requests that the Commission consider a framework, based on the existing EU standard eIDAS, an infrastructure for digital onboarding and the use of digital financial identities, which would aim to harmonise these measures across the Union insofar as necessary;
Amendment 318 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Points out that for KYC processes legal requirements for retail onboarding by financial institutions are different in every member state and therefore cross border onboarding with existing data sets are often not possible, which is also valid for onboarding of corporate clients and its related KYC/KYB (know your business) process; calls on the Commission to address this issue and foster the harmonisation of the KYC data required by member states;
Amendment 324 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Considers that a self-sovereign identity (SSI) based on distributed ledger technologies (DLT) can be a key element in developing a range of new services and platforms for the digital single market, independent from data aggregators and avoiding intermediaries, while at the same time providing high security and data protection standards for individual EU citizens;
Amendment 361 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – point 2
Annex I – part B – point 2
2. To make a legislative proposal on cyber resilience, which ensures consistent standards of ICT security across the Union financial sector. Such a framework should be future-oriented and focus on modernising the current rules applicable concerning cyber resilience, while also closing any regulatory loopholes and gaps, which may put businesses, investors and consumers at risk. Such a proposal should take due account of the risk of concentration and contagion stemming from the over reliance on a small number of ICT service providers, particularly cloud computing providers;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the full implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement, including the Protocol on Northern Ireland, is a prerequisite for and a basic component of a futurenew partnership between the EU and the UK; expresses concern at the UK Government’s statements demonstrating a lack of political will to fully comply with its commitments under the Withdrawal Agreement, namely regarding border controls in the Irish Sea; notes that no concrete reassurances were given on this matter during the first meeting of the Joint Committee; underlines that trust between the Parties is essential in these negotiations;
Amendment 7 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights the considerable level of integration and interdependence of the EU’s and UK’s economies, as well as the geographical proximity of the Parties; notes the acknowledgment of these circumstances by both Parties in the ‘Political Declaration setting out the Framework for the Future Relationship Between the EU and the UK’; recalls that the Political Declaration, based on the existing unique relationship, serves as the basis for an ambitious, broad, deep and flexible partnership;
Amendment 8 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has presented and published a comprehensive legal proposal for a future relationnew partnership, broadly in line with its negotiating mandate and the European Parliament’s resolution, and deeply regrets the fact that the UK Government has refused to accept a similar level of transparenc; urges the Commission to continue its transparency towards the co-legislators, as well as the financial services industry and consumers, and deeply regrets the fact that the UK Government has refused to accept a similar level of transparency; stresses that clarity and certainty are crucial to business continuity and a seamless provision of services to consumers, as well as to preventing market volatility;
Amendment 16 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes it to be in both Parties’ mutual interests to establish an ambitious futurenew economic partnership covering a wide number of sectors; underlines that, in any case, a level playing field must be ensured and EU standards safeguarded in order to avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ and the acquisition of unfair competitive advantages through the undercutting of levels of protection or other regulatory divergences; considers that any futurenew framework should safeguard EU financial stability, fair competition, investor and consumer protection, and the integrity of the single market, and commitments to combat climate change, while respecting the EU’s regulatory regime and decision- making autonomy;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Stresses the need to uphold common high standards in the field of state aid control and competition law; underlines that achieving a level playing field between the Parties will require a robust framework for state aid control, antitrust, and merger control that prevents unfair distortion of trade and competition;
Amendment 34 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that the resulting framework must be clear and transparent, and must not impose a disproportionate burden on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
Amendment 52 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls, in the context of financial services, that passporting rights, which are based on mutual recognition and harmonised prudential rules in the internal market, will cease to apply between the EU and the UK at the end of the transitional period; underlines that, thereafter, access to the European financial market must be based on equivalence decisions made within the EU’s legal framework; notes that equivalence examinations are a technical process which should be based on clear and transparent criteria; recalls that equivalence decisions are unilaterally granted and withdrawn by the European Commission, taking due account of the impact on the market and the need to preserve EU financial stability; recalls the importance of the EU maintaining its autonomy to adopt any measures for prudential reasons;
Amendment 67 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls, however, the limited scope of equivalence decisions, in particular in respect of retail financial services; calls on the Parties to endeavour to limit regulatory divergence in these sectors;
Amendment 68 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Welcomes the Parties’ commitment in the ‘Political Declaration setting out the Framework for the Future Relationship between the EU and the UK’ to endeavour to conclude the equivalence decision assessments by the end of June 2020; urges both Parties to continue their efforts to meet this objective;
Amendment 71 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Recommends that the Parties establish a mechanism for continuous cooperation and dialogue amongst policy- makers, regulators and supervisors; such a mechanism would serve as a forum for enhancing regulatory alignment and sharing supervisory concerns and best practices, including on new innovative services such as crypto assets; believes it is of mutual benefit to both Parties to continue to share necessary and relevant information and data between supervisors;
Amendment 74 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Given the increasing digitisation of trade, including services, recommends that the Parties agree, as part of the governance framework of the new partnership, provisions for facilitating digital trade, addressing unjustified barriers to trade by electronic means, and ensuring an open, secure and trustworthy online environment for businesses and consumers; these provisions should facilitate necessary data flows, subject to exceptions for legitimate public policy objectives, while not undermining the EU’s personal data protection rules, and should be subject to appropriate judicial control;
Amendment 76 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Believes it is of mutual benefit to both Parties to continue to share any necessary and relevant information and data required to combat money- laundering and terrorist financing; recommends that the Parties establish a mechanism that will ensure full cooperation and communication in this regard;
Amendment 80 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Defends the need to extend the transition period in order to allow enough time to conclude the negotiations on a comprehensive futuIn light of the impact of the Covid- 19 crisis on the societies, economies and politics of the Parties, asks the European Commission to pre partnership, while safeguarding citizens’ rights, legal certainty and economic ane the scenario of a potential extension to the transition period financial stability case requested by the UK.
Amendment 18 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to clarify the liability of Transport and Tourism platforms; invites the Commission to set a uniform obligation for platforms to verify the legality of the service offered and thestresses the need to promote responsible behaviour, transparency, legal certainty and thereby increase user confidence; invites the Commission to set a uniform obligation for short-term rental and mobility platforms to request from service providers a predefined and commonly agreed set of documents and certificates attesting the safety of the service offered, to verify the legality of the professional service providers, and to act ontake measures against illegal content, through a legally binding Notice and Action procedure., in order to create and maintain safer environment and legal certainty for the users and public authorities;
Amendment 32 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Commission to establish a set of information obligations for short-term rental platforms, in order to keep their service providers informed about any related relevant national, regional and local legislation in force;
Amendment 34 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Amendment 38 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. StresseRecalls the importance of establishing a European Authority tasked with overseeing the online platform market, with offices for Transport and Tourism.nsuring an effective implementation and enforcement of the rules affecting the online platform market by existing EU institutions, agencies and bodies; stresses the importance and the particularities of the Transport and Tourism online platform market, which require a sector-specific approach and special attention in that matter;
Amendment 44 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to enhance the relationship between stakeholders and local authorities in the Short-Term Rental market and mobility services.; believes that the Digital Services Act should aim at ensuring legal certainty and clarity by creating a governance framework formalising the cooperation between short-term rental and mobility platforms and national, regional and local authorities;
Amendment 54 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the Commission's agreement1a with certain platforms of the short-term rental sector on data sharing reached in March 2020 ; believes that this agreement will enable local authorities to better understand the development of collaborative economy and will allow for a reliable and continuous data sharing, therefore supporting an evidence-based policy making; calls on the Commission to undertake further steps by initiating a more comprehensive data sharing framework for short-term rental online platforms, following consultations of all relevant stakeholders, and to establish an obligation for systemic platforms to share their data accordingly1b, with Eurostat and the national statistics office of the country where the service providers operate; _________________ 1a"Commission reaches agreement with collaborative economy platforms to publish key data on tourism accommodation"; https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscor ner/detail/en/IP_20_194. 1bIn full compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
Amendment 63 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to build on the P2B Regulation to limit the dominance of market giants in the Transport and Tourism sector; stresses the urgency for the Commission to establish well defined criteria regarding “size” ofclear criteria and to provide for a definition of “systemic platforms.”;
Amendment 67 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Acknowledges that the digital economy, particularly platforms, can have a significant impact on long-established regulated business models in many strategic sectors such as transportation and hospitality; stresses the need to foster a level-playing field between online platforms and traditional enterprises operating in the transport and tourism sectors;
Amendment 79 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasizes the need for transparency in Transport and Tourism platforms, specifically on algorithms affecting service, pricing, and advertising.dvertising, and digital trust building mechanisms such as ratings and reviews;
Amendment 85 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the need for online platforms in Transport and Tourism to promote sustainability, also in line with the European Green Deal.Stresses the role that digitalisation can play in enhancing the sustainability of the transport and tourism sectors, especially by favouring a more efficient use of resources and under-used spaces and by supporting areas that do not traditionally benefit from tourism; highlights the need for online platforms in Transport and Tourism to promote sustainability, also in line with the European Green Deal; recalls that well informed users are the main driver of sustainable transport and tourism; invites the European Commission to set guidelines for the Transport and Tourism online platforms, providing tools and information on how to better inform their customers and users on the environmental impact of their services;
Amendment 89 #
2020/2018(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Highlights the role that innovative digital platforms can play in relaunching the European transport and tourism economy and driving sustainability in this sector by shifting users habits; recalls the importance of accessibility, interoperability and exchange of up-to- date and real time travel and traffic data to foster the online offer and demand of all modes of transport, including urban transport, in line with the ITS Directive2a; calls on the European Commission to lift all unnecessary barriers preventing the emergence of an online multimodal market for urban, regional and long- distance transport services. _________________ 2aDirective 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport Text with EEA relevance.
Amendment 2 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the use of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors should respect fundamental rights, freedoms and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; welcomes the Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in this regard, and invites the Commission to include the educational sector, limited to areas posing significant risks, in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications;
Amendment 21 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and opportunities, while at the same time posing risks regarding equal access to education and learning equalities at increasingly younger age with vulnerable and historically disadvantaged; calls for the non-discriminatory use of AI in the education sector; recalls the risks and discrimination arising from recently developed AI tools used for school admission;
Amendment 32 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make better use of data and AI-based technologies and Calls on the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders, both public and private, to closely cooperate on necessary reforms in the educational sector so as to make educational systems fit for the digital age; stresses that general public awareness of AI at all levels, including awareness of AI risks relating to privacy and bias, is essential for preparing everyone to make informed decisions;
Amendment 33 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the Commission’s focus on advanced skills while reiterating the importance of the basic skills; welcomes the upcoming update of the Skills Agenda in terms of everyone benefiting from the EU digital transformation; calls on the Commission to clarify the definition of AI skills in relation to digital skills; underlines the importance to diversify the technology sector and encourage students, in particular girls, to enrol in STEM courses;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the European Commission to take into account the role data plays in concentrating market power in competition assessments, including antitrust and merger decisions.
Amendment 42 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need for explicability of AI algorithms and the possibility of human verification and for due process, including the right of appeal, especially for decisions taken within the framework of prerogatives of public power; notes that the terms and conditions should always include the community guidelines as well as the procedure of appeal;
Amendment 51 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet; stresses that algorithms should be used only as a flagging mechanism in content moderation, subject to human intervention, as AI is unable to reliably distinguish between legal, illegal and harmful content;
Amendment 58 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Encourages the audiovisual service providers's access to audience data on the use of their content and services when offered on third-party platforms, without prejudice to regulation on data protection and privacy, in order to adequately assess the performance of their service and to better serve audiences.
Amendment 60 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the use of AI in the area of digitalised cultural heritage
Amendment 64 #
2020/2017(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to allocate scientific and financial resources to motivate and attract talented people in AI sector to both come and stay working in the EU;
Amendment 9 #
2020/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that the development of AI technologies in the transport sector has the potential to bring considerable economic, societal, environmental and safety benefits;will bring innovation, research, creation of new jobs, mobilisation of investment, employment, economic, societal, environmental and safety benefits that can make the sector more attractive to new generations
Amendment 15 #
2020/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that IP protection strategies will constantly evolve over time as AI evolves, and that it will be necessary to take account of issues such as flexible copyright, patent protection or even trade secrets rules, and to consider what route will provide innovators with the broadest and most robust means of IP protection that combine legal certainty and encourage new investment in private enterprises, universities, SMEs, clusters using public-private collaboration to support for research and development;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the possibility and relevance for companies of obtaining patents based on software or algorithms with a view to ensuring both the protection of innovation and the need for transparency required for trustworthy AI; stresses the need of maintaining a level playing field between these companies, as well as the importance of remaining consistent with competition law. stresses the importance of addressing the AI and IP in the transport sector, in full compliance with the principle of technological neutrality;
Amendment 50 #
2020/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to pay special attention to access for SMEs and clusters to data that could boost their activity as well as to technology centres and universities to promote their research programmes;
Amendment 3 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas across different transport industries, a range of scales of automation and artificial intelligence have been applied;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas AI in transport is driving the evolution of the next generation of IT systems and its application involves using many types of technologies such as autonomous vehicles, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and traffic management solutions;
Amendment 12 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Union and national legislation should ensure high product safety and a sound system management both ex ante and throughout a product’s life cycle, while facilitating the compensation of victims ex post;
Amendment 17 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that AI can be applied at different levels in vehicltransport infrastructure and in the transport modes and has an important impact on their autonomy and consequently on civil liability;
Amendment 21 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that safety is of paramount importance in the transport sector and that safety and liability are two faces of the same coin;
Amendment 22 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Recalls that the transport sector has been integrating AI technologies for decades, in particular with the introduction of the automation of train operation (ATO), including in urban areas where fully automated, driverless operations have increased system availability, network capacity and operational efficiency;
Amendment 23 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that automated functionalities can bring significant safety improvements in the medium and long term as well as unintended consequences (e.g. cybersecurity, data privacy); notes that AI could also be used for planning and guiding logistics chains, and for increasing efficiency, resilience, reliability, sustainability and flexibility;
Amendment 33 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of defining a clear division of responsibilities between software developers, manufacturers of various components, service and data providers and operators and end users;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that for AI-related applications in the transport sector with a specific high-risk profile, there is a need for a risk-based approach depending on the levels of automation and self-learning of the system;
Amendment 50 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Believes that despite the level of automation and of integration of artificial intelligence of the transport systems and vehicles, liability should always lie with natural and legal persons in order to ensure legal certainty and to encourage investment and the correct uptake of the technology;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of ensuring that drivers are always fully aware of a vehicle’s level of automation and their level of liability: drivers should be informed about their vehicles’ AI systems and related limitations of such systems such as activation, deactivation, failure; moreover, in-vehicle features should periodically remind the driver that he or she is in charge of monitoring the vehicle status and give clear warnings to the driver of the approaching limits of AI systems;
Amendment 57 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for further analysis of the need to adapt the European Driving Licence Directive due to automated functionalities of vehicles; urges moreover the Commission to carry out a periodic assessment of transport European regulatory framework to ensure it can respond to the safety and liability challenges related to the integration of AI technologies;
Amendment 58 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Believes human-centricity should be the basis for any update and development of regulatory framework related to the automation and AI- integration of transport;
Amendment 59 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that liability schemes in the event of an accident or a violation of traffic legislation need to be carefully designed for each level of automation and AI integration and communicated in a clear way to the users in order to ensure a smooth transition between full driver liability to full manufacturer and road operator liability;
Amendment 60 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that automated vehicles deal withthe successful integration of unmanned systems in the transport network, such as automated vehicles and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into respectively the land infrastructure and airspace relies on many variable signals and conditions; calls as a result for a regular update of digital maps providing a compulsory minimum set of information about the road network and for the correct development and deployment of the U-space;
Amendment 63 #
2020/2014(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Highlights that AI is one of the most important applications of the data economy; recalls that AI-based systems have a strong data dependency, and rely on data accuracy and relevance; calls therefore the Commission to explore the possibility to include in the Union product safety legislation requirements addressing the risks to safety of faulty data;
Amendment 1 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital 1 (new)
Recital 1 (new)
A. Whereas artificial intelligence (AI) is providing unprecedented opportunities to enhance the performance of the transport sector, by addressing the challenges of an increasing travel demand, safety and environmental concerns, while making all transport modes smarter, more efficient, and more comfortable;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the EU should act as a global AI norm-setter in the areas of civil and military use and of state authority, with an effective strategy aimed at strengthening its influence on shaping global standards; calls on the Commission and the Member States to advocate for broader cooperation within the UN, OECD, G7, G20 and other international fora in order to promote the EU approach to AI, emphasising the fundamental rights, freedoms and values that are enshrined in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international human rights law; with the increasing importance of research and development in the private sector, and massive investments from third countries such as the United States and China, Europe is facing competition and is, simultaneously, at risk of losing its strategic autonomy;
Amendment 18 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RPoints out that the railway transport has been one of the first sectors to rely on AI since its emergence; recalls the benefits of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), a seamless automatic train protection system replacing incompatible national ones, as regards reliability, capacity, costs, safety, speed and maintenance; supports its full deployment and its continuous establishment as a global automatic train protection (ATP) system; notes the work of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking;
Amendment 27 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that autonomous vehicles have great potential to improve mobility, safety, and bring environmental benefits; welcomes in this regard the UNECE World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations adopting the Framework Document for Automated Vehicles; notes the work of the new AI technical committee of the International Organization for Standardization;
Amendment 28 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the European Commission to propose an effective approach to ensure a clear international legal framework for the driver concept, and relevant issues of responsibility and liability, within the meaning of the UN Conventions and other international traffic laws;
Amendment 38 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. RPoints out that the global shipping industry has greatly changed thanks to AI integration in the most recent years; recalls the current comprehensive discussions in the International Maritime Organization on integrating new and emerging technologies, such as autonomous ships, in the regulatory framework;
Amendment 44 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses how intelligent transport systems mitigate traffic congestion and contribute to improving efficiency and mobility solutions; draws attention to the increased exposure of traditional transport networks to cyber threats; welcomes the Commission’ s intention to include cybersecurity as a regular agenda item for discussion within transport related international organisations;
Amendment 45 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Supports the use of machine learning AI using big data for the optimization of long term performance, maintenance, failure prediction and construction planning of transport infrastructure and buildings, including factors such as safety energy efficiency or costs;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out that the effective transportation of goods, ammunition, armaments, and troops is an essential component of successful military operations; stresses that AI is expected to play a crucial roles in the military logistics and transport; points out that different countries across the world, including European Members States, are embedding AI weapons and other systems used on land, naval, airborne platforms; recalls that AI application in the transport sector could provide for new capabilities and allow new form of tactics, like the combination of many systems such as drones, unmanned boats or tanks in an independent and coordinated operation.
Amendment 54 #
2020/2013(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Recalls that an international agreement to regulate emerging military technologies, such as lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), has so far failed to be reached and points out the EU, as a whole, has only recently agreed to discuss on the effects of AI developments and digitalisation on the defence sector; believes that the EU can play a crucial role in helping Member States in harmonising their approach to military AI, in order to lead the international discussions.
Amendment 57 #
2020/1998(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the need to go forwards with new own resources proposals asking for a clear and binding calendar for their introduction; recalls the importance of creating European sovereignty in digital, industrial, health and security fields;
Amendment 37 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. These characteristics of core platform services include among others extreme scale economies, which often result from nearly zero marginal costs to add business users, active users or end users. Other characteristics of core platform services are very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many active users and end users through the multi-sidedness of these services, a significant degree of dependence of both business users and end users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing for the same purpose by end users, vertical integration, and data driven- advantages. All these characteristics combined with unfair conduct by providers of these services can have the effect of substantially undermining the contestability of the core platform services, as well as impacting the fairness of the commercial relationship between providers of such services and their business users and end users, leading to rapid and potentially far-reaching decreases in business users’ and end users’ choice in practice, and therefore can confer to the provider of those services the position of a so-called gatekeeper.
Amendment 38 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) Acknowledges that the digital economy, particularly platforms, can have a significant impact on long-established regulated business models in many strategic sectors such as transportation and hospitality. Stresses the need to foster a level-playing field between gatekeepers and traditional enterprises operating in the transport and tourism sectors. Furthermore, emphasises the need for transparency, for the sake of consumers, in transport and tourism platforms, specifically of algorithms affecting service, pricing, advertising and digital trust building mechanisms such as ratings and reviews.
Amendment 39 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
Recital 2 b (new)
(2 b) Considers that in defining gatekeepers and core platform services it is important to distinguish between two types of end user, the active end user and the passive end user. An active end user would in principle share their personal data with the gatekeeper or platform in the form of a profile or storing personal data with the gatekeeper in a similar way. Believes, therefore, that it is important to distinguish this type of user from an end user who browses a platform or page but does not share any personal data directly with the gatekeeper or platform.
Amendment 40 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) A small number of large providers of core platform services have emerged with considerable economic power. Typically, they feature an ability to connect many business users with many active users and end users through their services which, in turn, allows them to leverage their advantages, such as their access to large amounts of data, from one area of their activity to new ones. Some of these providers exercise control over whole platform ecosystems in the digital economy and are structurally extremely difficult to challenge or contest by existing or new market operators, irrespective of how innovative and efficient these may be. Contestability is particularly reduced due to the existence of very high barriers to entry or exit, including high investment costs, which cannot, or not easily, be recuperated in case of exit, and absence of (or reduced access to) some key inputs in the digital economy, such as data. As a result, the likelihood increases that the underlying markets do not function well – or will soon fail to function well.
Amendment 40 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In particular, online intermediation services, online search engines, operating systems, online social networking, video sharing platform services, number- independent interpersonal communication services, cloud computing services and, online advertising services and web browsers all have the capacity to affect a large number of end users and businesses alike, which entails a risk of unfair business practices. They therefore should be included in the definition of core platform services and fall into the scope of this Regulation. Online intermediation services may also be active in the field of financial services, and they may intermediate or be used to provide such services as listed non-exhaustively in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . In certain circumstances, the notion of end users should encompass users that are traditionally considered business users, but in a given situation do not use the core platform services to provide goods or services to other end users, such as for example businesses relying on cloud computing services for their own purposes. _________________ 32Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services, OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1.
Amendment 41 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The combination of those features of gatekeepers is likely to lead in many cases to serious imbalances in bargaining power and, consequently, to unfair practices and conditions for business users as well as active and end users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers, to the detriment of prices, quality, choice and innovation therein.
Amendment 42 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Gatekeepers have a significant impact on the internal market, providing gateways for a large number of business users, to reach active and end users, everywhere in the Union and on different markets. The adverse impact of unfair practices on the internal market and particularly weak contestability of core platform services, including their negative societal and economic implications, have led national legislators and sectoral regulators to act. A number of national regulatory solutions have already been adopted or proposed to address unfair practices and the contestability of digital services or at least with regard to some of them. This has created a risk of divergent regulatory solutions and thereby fragmentation of the internal market, thus raising the risk of increased compliance costs due to different sets of national regulatory requirements.
Amendment 43 #
2020/0374(COD)
(7) Therefore, business users, active users and end- users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers should be afforded appropriate regulatory safeguards throughout the Union against the unfair behaviour of gatekeepers in order to facilitate cross- border business within the Union and thereby improve the proper functioning of the internal market and to address existing or likely emerging fragmentation in the specific areas covered by this Regulation. In this regard, calls on the Commission to clarify the liability of transport and tourism platforms, in order to promote responsible behaviour, transparency, legal certainty and thereby increase user confidence. Moreover, while gatekeepers tend to adopt global or at least pan-European business models and algorithmic structures, they can adopt, and in some cases have adopted, different business conditions and practices in different Member States, which is liable to create disparities between the competitive conditions for the users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers, to the detriment of integration within the internal market.
Amendment 44 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) By approximating diverging national laws, obstacles to the freedom to provide and receive services, including retail services, within the internal market should be eliminated. A targeted set of harmonised mandatory rules should therefore be established at Union level to ensure contestable and fair digital markets featuring the presence of gatekeepers within the internal market, and in order to create and maintain a safer environment and legal certainty for the users and public authorities.
Amendment 45 #
2020/0374(COD)
(29) Designated gatekeepers should comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation in respect of each of the core platform services listed in the relevant designation decision. The mandatory rules should apply taking into account the conglomerate position of gatekeepers, where applicable. Furthermore, implementing measures that the Commission may by decision impose on the gatekeeper following a regulatory dialogue should be designed in an effective manner, having regard to the features of core platform services as well as possible circumvention risks and in compliance with the principle of proportionality and the fundamental rights of the undertakings concerned as well as those of third parties. The participants, agenda and results of regulatory dialogue should be made public. The regulatory dialogue itself should not take longer than 6 months.
Amendment 46 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Weak contestability and unfair practices in the digital sector are more frequent and pronounced for certain digital services than for others. This is the case in particular for widespread and commonly used digital services that mostly directly intermediate between business users and end users and where features such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing or vertical integration are the most prevalent. Often, there is only one or very few large providers of those digital services. These providers of core platform services have emerged most frequently as gatekeepers for business users and end users with far-reaching impacts, gaining the ability to easily set commercial conditions and terms in a unilateral and detrimental manner for their business users and end users. Accordingly, it is necessary to focus only on those digital services that are most broadly used by business users and active or end users and where, based on current market conditions, concerns about weak contestability and unfair practices by gatekeepers are more apparent and pressing from an internal market perspective. In this regard, stresses the importance and the particularities of the transport and tourism online platform market, which require a sector-specific approach and special attention in this regard. Highlights the importance of collaborative economy platforms in the transport and tourism sectors, on which services are provided by both individuals and professionals and stresses the importance of avoiding imposing disproportionate information requirements and administrative burdens on peer-to-peer providers of services.
Amendment 46 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The obligations laid down in this Regulation are limited to what is necessary and justified to address the unfairness of the identified practices by gatekeepers and to ensure contestability in relation to core platform services provided by gatekeepers. Therefore, the obligations should correspond to those practices that are considered unfair by taking into account the features of the digital sector and where experience gained, for example in the enforcement of the EU competition rules, shows that they have a particularly negative direct impact on the business users and end users. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of a brief regulatory dialogue with gatekeepers to tailor those obligations that are likely to require specific implementing measures in order to ensure their effectiveness and proportionality. The obligations should only be updated after a thorough investigation on the nature and impact of specific practices that may be newly identified, following an in-depth investigation, as unfair or limiting contestability in the same manner as the unfair practices laid down in this Regulation while potentially escaping the scope of the current set of obligations.
Amendment 49 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities including national courts. For example, business users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business user accounts or unclear grounds for product de-listings. Any practice that would in any way inhibit such a possibility of raising concerns or seeking available redress, for instance by means of confidentiality clauses in agreements or other written terms, should therefore be prohibited. This should be without prejudice to the right of business users and gatekeepers to lay down in their agreements the terms of use including the use of lawful complaints- handling mechanisms, including any use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms or of the jurisdiction of specific courts in compliance with respective Union and national law This should therefore also be without prejudice to the role gatekeepers play in the fight against illegal content online.
Amendment 54 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
Recital 48
(48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control or with which they have entered into particular cooperation agreements or which they prefer due to other reasons unrelated to their service´s actual relevance, which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online search engine. When offering those products or services on the core platform service, gatekeepers can reserve a better position to their own offering, in terms of ranking, as opposed to the products of third parties also operating onintermediated via that core platform service. This can occur for instance with products or services, including other core platform services, which are ranked in the results communicated by online search engines, or which are partly or entirely embedded in online search engines results, groups of results specialised in a certain topic, displayed along with the results of an online search engine, which are considered or used by certain end users as a service distinct or additional to the online search engine. Other instances are those of software applications which are distributed through software application stores, or products or services that are given prominence and display in the newsfeed of a social network, or products or services ranked in search results or displayed on an online marketplace. In those circumstances, the gatekeeper is in a dual- role position as intermediary for third party providers and as direct provider of products or services of the gatekeeper. Consequently, these gatekeepers have the ability to undermine directly the contestability for those products or services on these core platform services, to the detriment of business users which are not controlled by the gatekeeper.
Amendment 55 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) IWhile in such situations of a conflict of interest, the gatekeeper should not partly or entirely embed such distinct product or service in online search engine results or groups of results. Gatekeeper may rank its products or services, provided that it does not engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it controls. To ensure that this obligation is effective, it should also be ensured that the conditions that apply to such ranking are also generally fair. Rank or cooperates with or prefers any other reason unrelated to the relevance of the product or service. In particular, where a gatekeeper´s onlinge should in this context cover all forms of relative prominence, including display, rating, linking or voice results. To ensure that this obligation is effective and cannot be circumvented it should also apply to any measure that may have an equivalent effect to the differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking. The guidelines adopearch engine results page includes ranking of separate products or services in the same format and on the same terms and conditions. Should this take place in exchange for remuneration, to avoid any conflict of interest, the gatekeeper´s separated pursuant to Artroduct or servicle 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 should also facilitate the implementation and enforcement of this obligation.34 _________________ 34Commission Notice: Guidelines on ranking transparency pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ C 424, 8.12.2020, p. 1)shall be treated as a separate commercial entity and shall be commercially viable as a stand-alone service, offered outside of the gatekeeper´s core platform service.
Amendment 58 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) This should allow the Commission to intervene in time and effectively, while fully respecting the proportionality of the considered measures. It should also reassure actual or potential market participants about the fairness and contestability of the services concerned. In this regard, calls on the Commission to undertake further steps by initiating a more comprehensive data sharing framework for online platforms dedicated to short-term rentals, following consultations with all relevant stakeholders, and to establish an obligation for platforms to hare their data accordingly, in full compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, with Eurostat and the national statistics office of the country where the service providers operate.
Amendment 61 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) In particular gGatekeepers which provide access to software application storcore platform services serve as an important gateway for business users that seek to reach end users. In view of the imbalance in bargaining power between those gatekeepers and business users of their software application storcore platform services, those gatekeepers should not be allowed to impose general conditions, including pricing conditions, that would be unfair or lead to unjustified differentiation. Pricing or other general access conditions should be considered unfair if they lead to an imbalance of rights and obligations imposed on business users or confer an advantage on the gatekeeper which is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users or lead to a disadvantage for business users in providing the same or similar services as the gatekeeper. The following benchmarks can serve as a yardstick to determine the fairness of general access conditions: prices charged or conditions imposed for the same or similar services by other providers of software application storcore platform services; prices charged or conditions imposed by the provider of the software application store for different related or similar services or to different types of end users; prices charged or conditions imposed by the provider of the software application storecore platform services for the same service in different geographic regions; prices charged or conditions imposed by the provider of the software application storecore platform services for the same service the gatekeeper offers to itself. This obligation should not establish an access right and it should be without prejudice to the ability of providers of software application storcore platform services to take the required responsibility in the fight against illegal and unwanted content as set out in Regulation [Digital Services Act].
Amendment 62 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
Recital 58
(58) To ensure the effectiveness of the obligations laid down by this Regulation, while also making certain that these obligations are limited to what is necessary to ensure contestability and tackling the harmful effects of the unfair behaviour by gatekeepers, it is important to clearly define and circumscribe them so as to allow the gatekeeper to immediately comply with them, in full respect of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, consumer protection, cyber security and product safety. The gatekeepers should ensure the compliance with this Regulation by design. The necessary measures should therefore be as much as possible and where relevant integrated into the technological design used by the gatekeepers. However, it may in certain cases be appropriate for the Commission, following a dialogue with the gatekeeper concerned, to further specify some of the measures that the gatekeeper concerned should adopt in order to effectively comply with those obligations that are susceptible of being further specified. This possibility of a regulatory dialogue should facilitate compliance by gatekeepers and expedite the correct implementation of the Regulation.
Amendment 63 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) In exceptional circumstances justified on the limited grounds of public morality, public health or public security, the Commission should be able to decide that the obligation concerned does not apply to a specific core platform service. Affecting these public interests can indicate that the cost to society as a whole of enforcing a certain obligation would in a certain exceptional case be too high and thus disproportionate. The regulatory dialogue to facilitate compliance with limited suspension and exemption possibilities should ensure the proportionality of the obligations in this Regulation without undermining the intended ex ante effects on fairness and contestability. The participants, agenda and results of regulatory dialogue should be made public. The regulatory dialogue itself should not take longer than 6 months.
Amendment 65 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
Recital 65
(65) The services and practices in core platform services and markets in which these intervene can change quickly and to a significant extent. The Commission may soon need to assess whether new services such as voice-enabled services, should be added to the list of core platform services. To ensure that this Regulation remains up to date and constitutes an effective and holistic regulatory response to the problems posed by gatekeepers, it is important to provide for a regular review of the lists of core platform services as well as of the obligations provided for in this Regulation. This is particularly important to ensure that behaviour that may limit the contestability of core platform services or is unfair is identified. While it is important to conduct a review on a regular basis, given the dynamically changing nature of the digital sector, in order to ensure legal certainty as to the regulatory conditions, any reviews should be conducted within a reasonable and appropriate time-frame. Market investigations should also ensure that the Commission has a solid evidentiary basis on which it can assess whether it should propose to amend this Regulation in order to expand, or further detail, the lists of core platform services. They should equally ensure that the Commission has a solid evidentiary basis on which it can assess whether it should propose to amend the obligations laid down in this Regulation or whether it should adopt a delegated act updating such obligations.
Amendment 68 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation layse purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present.
Amendment 75 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. In order to avoid the fragmentation of the internal market, Member States shall not impose on gatekeepers further obligations by way of laws, regulations or administrative action for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. This is without prejudice to rules pursuing other legitimate public interests, in compliance with Union law. In particular, nothing in this Regulation precludes Member States from imposing obligations, which are compatible with Union law, on undertakings, including providers of core platform services where these obligations are unrelated to the relevant undertakings having a status of gatekeeper within the meaning of this Regulation in order to protect consumers or to fight against acts of unfair competition.
Amendment 76 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 72
Recital 72
(72) The Commission should be able to take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with the obligations laid down in this Regulation. Such actions should include the ability of the Commission to appoint independent external experts, such as and auditors to assist the Commission in this procesrequest the active cooperation of the European Court of Auditors, including where applicable from competent national authorities and independent authorities, such as data or consumer protection authorities.
Amendment 78 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 75
Recital 75
(75) In the context of proceedings carried out under this Regulation, the undertakings concerned should be accorded the right to be heard by the Commission and the decisions taken should be widely publicised. While ensuring the rights to good administration and the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned, in particular, the right of access to the file and the right to be heard, it is essential that confidential informationand sensitive commercial information, which could affect the privacy of trade secrets, be protected. Furthermore, while respecting the confidentiality of the information, the Commission should ensure that any information relied on for the purpose of the decision is disclosed to an extent that allows the addressee of the decision to understand the facts and considerations that led up to the decision. Finally, under certain conditions certain business records, such as communication between lawyers and their clients, may be considered confidential if the relevant conditions are met.
Amendment 81 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) web browsers
Amendment 82 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
Recital 78
(78) The Commission should periodically evaluate this Regulation and closely monitor its effects on the contestability and fairness of commercial relationships in the online platform economy, in particular with a view to determining the need for amendments in light of relevant technological or commercial developments. This evaluation should include the regular review of the list of core platform services and the obligations addressed to gatekeepers as well as enforcement of these, in view of ensuring that digital markets across the Union are contestable and fair. In order to obtain a broad view of developments in the sector, the evaluation should take into account the experiences of Member States and relevant stakeholders. The Commission may in this regard also consider the opinions and reports presented to it by the Observatory on the Online Platform Economy that was first established by Commission Decision C(2018)2393 of 26 April 2018, by Eurostat, and by the national statistics offices of the countries where the service providers operate. Following the evaluation, the Commission should take appropriate measures. The Commission should to maintain a high level of protection and respect for the common EU rights and values, particularly equality and non-discrimination, as an objective when conducting the assessments and reviews of the practices and obligations provided in this Regulation.
Amendment 87 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
(16 a) 'Active user' means any natural or legal person using core platform services, and having saved personal data in the form of a profile of that user or similar, on a platform on a long-term basis;
Amendment 89 #
2020/0374(COD)
(b) it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach both active and end users; and
Amendment 93 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
(b) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (b) where it provides a core platform service that has more than 450 million monthly active end users established or located in the Union and more than 10 000 yearly active business users established in the Union in the last financial year;
Amendment 106 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 108 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4
Amendment 109 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 8
Article 3 – paragraph 8
8. The gatekeeper shall comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 within sixfour months after a core platform service has been included in the list pursuant to paragraph 7 of this Article.
Amendment 126 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) A fragmentation of the internal market can only be effectively averted if Member States are prevented from applying national rules which are specific to the types of undertakings and serviceservices and their providers covered by this Regulation. At the same time, since this Regulation aims at complementing the enforcement of competition law, it should be specified that this Regulation is without prejudice to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, to the corresponding national competition rules and to other national competition rules regarding unilateral behaviour that are based on an individualised assessment of market positions and behaviour, including its likely effects and the precise scope of the prohibited behaviour, and which provide for the possibility of undertakings to make efficiency and objective justification arguments for the behaviour in question. However, the application of the latter rules should not affect the obligations imposed on gatekeepers under this Regulation and their uniform and effective application in the internal market.
Amendment 145 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The fact that a digital service qualifies as a core platform service in light of its widespread and common use and its importance for connecting business users and end users does not as such give rise to sufficiently serious concerns of contestability and unfair practices. It is only when a core platform service constitutes an important gateway and is operated by a provider with a significant impact in the internal market and an entrenched and durable position, or by a provider that will foreseeably have such a position in the near future, that such concerns arise. Accordingly, the targeted set of harmonised rules laid down in this Regulation should apply only to undertakingproviders of core platform services designated on the basis of these three objective criteria, and they should only apply to those of their core platform services that individually constitute an important gateway for business users to reach end users.
Amendment 146 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the effective application of this Regulation to providers of core platform services which are most likely to satisfy these objective requirements, and where unfair conduct weakening contestability is most prevalent and impactful, the Commission should be able to directly designate as gatekeepers those providers of core platform services which meet certain quantitative thresholds. Such undertakingproviders of core platform services should in any event be subject to a fast designation process which should start upon the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 149 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) A very significant turnover in the Union and the provision of a core platform service in at least three Member States constitute compelling indications that the provider of a core platform service has a significant impact on the internal market. This is equally true where a provider of a core platform service in at least three Member States has a very significant market capitalisation or equivalent fair market value. Therefore, a provider of a core platform service should be presumed to have a significant impact on the internal market where it provides a core platform service in at least three Member States and where either its group turnover realised in the EEA is equal to or exceeds a specific, high threshold or the market capitalisation of the group is equal to or exceeds a certain high absolute value. For providers of core platform services that belong to undertakings that are not publicly listed, the equivalent fair market value above a certain high absolute value should be referred to. The Commission should use its power to adopt delegated acts to develop an objective methodology to calculate that value. A high EEA group turnover in conjunction with the threshold of users in the Union of core platform services reflects a relatively strong ability to monetise these users. A high market capitalisation relative to the same threshold number of users in the Union reflects a relatively significant potential to monetise these users in the near future. This monetisation potential in turn reflects in principle the gateway position of the undertakings concerned. Both indicators are in addition reflective of their financial capacity, including their ability to leverage their access to financial markets to reinforce their position. This may for example happen where this superior access is used to acquire other undertakingproviders of core platform services, which ability has in turn been shown to have potential negative effects on innovation. Market capitalisation can also be reflective of the expected future position and effect on the internal market of the providers concerned, notwithstanding a potentially relatively low current turnover. The market capitalisation value can be based on a level that reflects the average market capitalisation of the largest publicly listed undertakingcore platform services in the Union over an appropriate period.
Amendment 164 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) A particular subset of rules should apply to those providers of core platform services that are foreseen to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future. The same specific features of core platform services make them prone to tipping: once a service provider has obtained a certain advantage over rivals or potential challengers in terms of scale or intermediation power, its position may become unassailable and the situation may evolve to the point that it is likely to become durable and entrenched in the near future. UndertakingProviders of core platform services can try to induce this tipping and emerge as gatekeeper by using some of the unfair conditions and practices regulated in this Regulation. In such a situation, it appears appropriate to intervene before the market tips irreversibly.
Amendment 168 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Designated gatekeepers should comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation in respect of each of the core platform services listed in the relevant designation decision. The mandatory rules should apply taking into account the conglomerate position of gatekeepers within the undertaking to which they belong, where applicable. Furthermore, implementing measures that the Commission may by decision impose on the gatekeeper following a regulatory dialogue should be designed in an effective manner, having regard to the features of core platform services as well as possible circumvention risks and in compliance with the principle of proportionality and the fundamental rights of the undertakings concerned as well as those of third parties.
Amendment 184 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers gives them potential advantages in terms of accumulation of data, thereby raising barriers to entry. To ensure that gatekeepers do not unfairly undermine the contestability of core platform services, they should enable their end users to freely choose to opt-in to such business practices by offering a less personalised alternative. The possibility should cover all possible sources of personal data, including own services of the gatekeeper as well as third party websites, and should be proactively presented to the end user in an explicit, clear and straightforward manner. This should be amended without prejudice without other provisions governing the storage, processing and use of data, such as the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or the proposed Data Governance Act.
Amendment 195 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. When sending a simple request for information to an undertaking or association of undertakings, the Commission shall state the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix the time-limit within which the information is to be provided, and the penalties provided for in Article 26 for supplying incomplete, incorrect or misleading information or explanations. Such time-limits provided should respect the size and capabilities of an undertaking or association of undertakings.
Amendment 196 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. Where the Commission requires undertakings and associations of undertakings to supply information by decision, it shall state the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix the time-limit within which it is to be provided. Where the Commission requires undertakings to provide access to its data-bases and algorithms, it shall state the legal basis and the purpose of the request, and fix the time- limit within which it is to be provided. It shall also indicate the penalties provided for in Article 26 and indicate or impose the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 27. It shall further indicate the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice. Such time-limits provided should respect the size and capabilities of an undertaking or association of undertakings.
Amendment 261 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
Recital 63
(63) Following a market investigation, an undertaking providinger of a core platform service could be found to fulfil all of the overarching qualitative criteria for being identified as a gatekeeper. It should then, in principle, comply with all of the relevant obligations laid down by this Regulation. However, for gatekeepers that have been designated by the Commission as likely to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future, the Commission should only impose those obligations that are necessary and appropriate to prevent that the gatekeeper concerned achieves an entrenched and durable position in its operations. With respect to such emerging gatekeepers, the Commission should take into account that this status is in principle of a temporary nature, and it should therefore be decided at a given moment whether such a provider of core platform services should be subjected to the full set of gatekeeper obligations because it has acquired an entrenched and durable position, or conditions for designation are ultimately not met and therefore all previously imposed obligations should be waived.
Amendment 316 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new)
Amendment 348 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
(23 a) "Payment aggregation services" means technical services within the meaning of article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council allowing end users to enroll and execute payment services within the meaning of article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council provided by different Payment Service Providers on the basis of a contractual relationship between the payment aggregation service provider and the third party providers whose payment services are aggregated.
Amendment 384 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
A failure by a relevant provider of core platform services to notify the required information pursuant to this paragraph shall not prevent the Commission from designating these providers as gatekeepers pursuant to paragraph 4 at any time or adopting a decision pursuant to Article 7(2).
Amendment 407 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where other gatekeepers are not identified pursuant to paragraph 2 within the undertaking to which the provider of core platform services belongs, only exceptionally may the abovementioned elements allow such provider of core platform services to be identified as a gatekeeper in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15. This process shall also take into consideration whether there are other gatekeepers identified pursuant to paragraph 2 within the undertaking.
Amendment 419 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 8
Article 3 – paragraph 8
8. The gatekeeper shall notify the Commission of the measures that it intends to implement to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 after a core platform service has been included in the list pursuant to paragraph 7 of this Article and shall comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 within six months after a core platform service has been included in the list pursuant to paragraph 7 of this Article.
Amendment 431 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data, unless the end user has been presented with the specific choice and provided consent provided consent in the sense of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in particular, has been presented with the effective possibility of selecting the specific purposes for which they consent to the processing of their personal data, including the sources of their personal data to be combined, without such selection affecting the sense of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. degree of quality of their engagement with the core platform services;
Amendment 453 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) refrain from preventing or restricting business users from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers, including by means of contractual conditions;
Amendment 496 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) refrain from using, in competition with business users, any data not publicly available, which is generated through activities by those business users, including by the end users of these business users, of its core platform services or ancillary services provided by those business users of its core platform services or by the end users of these business users;
Amendment 516 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non-discriminatory conditions to such ranking, including display;
Amendment 529 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) allowprovide business users and providers of ancillary services access under fair and equal conditions to and interoperability with the same operating system, hardware or software features that are available or used in the provision by the gatekeeper of any ancillary services, directly or through a partnership agreement, of any ancillary services and any core platform service, where such access or interoperability is necessary to provide ancillary services to the core platform service of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 547 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) provide effective portability of data generated through the activity of a business user or end user and shall, in particular, provide tools for end users to facilitate the exercise of data portability, in line with of personal data, in line with and building on Regulation EU 2016/679, and non- personal data including by the provision of continuous and real-time access . The Commission shall determine by means of implementing acts the technical means acceptable to ensure an easy, secure, continuous and real-time access;
Amendment 554 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) provide business users, or thirdeffective paorties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access andability of data generated through the activity of a business user of aggregated or non-aggregated data, that is provided for r end user and shall, in particular, provide tools for generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide access and use onld users to facilitate the exercise of data portability of personal data, in line with and building on Regulation EU 2016/679, and of non- personal data including by wthere directly connected with the use effectuated by the end user in respect of the products or services offered by the relevant business user through the relevant core platform service, and when the end user opts in to such sharing with a consent in the sense of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679; provision of continuous and real-time access. The Commission shall determine by means of implementing acts the technical means acceptable to ensure an easy, secure, continuous and real-time access;
Amendment 586 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1 data that is not publicly available shall include any aggregated and non-aggregated data generated by business users that can be inferred from, or collectedprovided by, or observed from business users or end users through, the commercial activities of business users or their customers on the core platform service of the gatekeeper.
Amendment 616 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. A gatekeeper may request the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18 for the Commission to determine whether the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement or has implemented under Article 6 are effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation in the specific circumstances. A gatekeeper may, with its request, provide a reasoned submission to explain in particular why the measures that it intends to implement or has implemented are effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation in the specific circumstances. A gatekeeper shall continue to comply with all relevant obligations during the proceedings pursuant to Article 18.
Amendment 732 #
2020/0374(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a Feedback from third parties The Commission shall provide a dedicated mechanism for third parties to raise any obstacles encountered with the gatekeeper’s implementation of obligations under Articles 5 and 6 of the Regulation.
Amendment 10 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Council Directive 2008/114/EC17 provides for a procedure for designating European critical infrastructures in the energy and transport sectors, the disruption or destruction of which would have significant cross-border impact on at least two Member States. That Directive focused exclusively on the protection of such infrastructures. However, the evaluation of Directive 2008/114/EC conducted in 201918 found that due to the increasingly interconnected and cross-border nature of operations using critical infrastructure such as high speed rail or air traffic management, protective measures relating to individual assets alone are insufficient to prevent all disruptions from taking place. Therefore, it is necessary to shift the approach towards ensuring the resilience of critical entities, that is, their ability to mitigate, absorb, accommodate to and recover from incidents that have the potential to disrupt the operations of the critical entity and the functioning of the internal market. _________________ 17Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection (OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p.75). 18 SWD(2019) 308.
Amendment 13 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Despite existing measures at 19 19 Union and national level aimed at supporting the protection of critical infrastructures in the Union, the entities operating those infrastructures are not adequately equipped to address current and anticipated future risks to their operations that may result in disruptions of the provision of services that are essential for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities. This is due to a dynamic threat landscape with an evolving terrorist threat and growing interdependencies between infrastructures and sectors, as well as an increased physical risk due to natural disasters and climate change, which increases the frequency and scale of extreme weather events and brings long-term changes in average climate that can reduce the capacity and efficiency of certain infrastructure types if resilience or climate adaptation measures are not in place. Moreover, relevant sectors such as certain transport and tourism sectors, and types of entities are not recognised consistently as critical in all Member States. _________________ 19European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP).
Amendment 21 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Those growing interdependencies are the result of an increasingly cross- border and interdependent network of service provision using key infrastructures across the Union in the sectors of energy, transport, banking, financial market infrastructure, digital infrastructure, drinking and waste water, health, certain aspects of public administration, as well as space in as far as the provision of certain services depending on ground-based infrastructures that are owned, managed and operated either by Member States or by private parties is concerned, therefore not covering infrastructures owned, managed or operated by or on behalf of the Union as part of its space programmes. These interdependencies mean that any disruption, even one initially confined to one entity or one sector, can have cascading effects more broadly, potentially resulting in far-reaching and long-lasting negative impacts in the delivery of services across the internal market. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the vulnerability of our increasingly interdependent societies, particularly the transport and tourism sectors, in the face of low-probability risks.
Amendment 23 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The entities involved in the provision of essential services are increasingly subject to diverging requirements imposed under the laws of the Member States. The fact that some Member States have less stringent security requirements on these entities not only risks impacting negatively on the maintenance of vital societal functions or economic activities across the Union, it also leads to obstacles to the proper functioning of the internal market. The resilience of critical entities gives investors and companies reliability and trust, which are cornerstones to a well- working internal market. Similar types of entities are considered as critical in some Member States but not in others, and those which are identified as critical are subject to divergent requirements in different Member States. This results in additional and unnecessary administrative burdens for companies operating across borders, notably for companies active in Member States with more stringent requirements.
Amendment 31 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In view of ensuring a comprehensive approach to the resilience of critical entities, each Member State should have a strategy setting out objectives and policy measures to be implemented. To achieve this, and taking account of the hybrid nature of many threats, Member States should ensure that their cybersecurity strategies provide for a policy framework for enhanced coordination between the competent authority under this Directive and the NIS 2 Directive in the context of information sharing on incidents and cyber and non-cyber threats and the exercise of supervisory tasks.
Amendment 33 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The actions of Member States to identify and help ensure the resilience of critical entities should follow a risk-based approach that targets efforts to the entities most relevant for the performance of vital societal functions or economic activities, for example multi-modal hubs for transport, rail infrastructure or air traffic management. In order to ensure such a targeted approach, each Member State should carry out, within a harmonised framework, an assessment of all relevant natural and man- made risks that may affect the provision of essential services, including accidents, natural disasters, public health emergencies such as pandemics, and antagonistic threats, including terrorist offences. When carrying out those risk assessments, Member States should take into account other general or sector-specific risk assessment carried out pursuant to other acts of Union law and should consider the dependencies between sectors, including from other Member States and third countries. The outcomes of the risk assessment should be used in the process of identification of critical entities and to assist those entities in meeting the resilience requirements of this Directive.
Amendment 53 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. To that end, this Directive:
Amendment 55 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a To be placed before Paragraph 1 1. This Directive lays down measures with a view to achieving a high level of resilience of critical entities in order to ensure the provision of essential services within the Union and improve the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 58 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall, following consultation with critical entities, adopt by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive] a strategy for reinforcing the resilience of critical entities. This strategy shall set out strategic objectives and policy measures with a view to achieving and maintaining a high level of resilience on the part of those critical entities and covering at least the sectors referred to in the Annex.
Amendment 67 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 8 shall establish a list of essential services in the sectors referred to in the Annex. They shall carry out by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive], and subsequently where necessary, and at least every four years, an assessment of all relevant risks that may affect the provision of those essential services, with a view to identifying critical entities in accordance with Article 5(1), and assisting those critical entities to take measures pursuant to Article 11.
Amendment 75 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall provide the Commission with data on the types of risks identified and the outcomes of the risk assessments, per sector and sub-sector referred to in the Annex, by [threefour years after entry into force of this Directive] and subsequently where necessary and at least every four years.
Amendment 79 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. By [threefour years and three months after entry into force of this Directive] Member States shall identify for each sector and subsector referred to in the Annex, other than points 3, 4 and 8 thereof, the critical entities.
Amendment 82 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Each Member State shall establish a list of the critical entities identified and ensure that those critical entities are notified of their identification as critical entities within onetwo months of that identification, informing them of their obligations pursuant to Chapters II and III and the date from which the provisions of those Chapters apply to them.
Amendment 83 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 8 of this Directive notify the competent authorities that the Member States designated in accordance with Article 8 of [the NIS 2 Directive], of the identity of the critical entities that they identified under this Article within onetwo months of that identification.
Amendment 88 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall submit to the Commission by [threefour years and three months after the entry into force of this Directive] the following information:
Amendment 91 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. As regards the sectors referred to in points 3, 4 and 8 of the Annex, Member States shall, by [threefour years and three months after entry into force of this Directive], identify the entities that shall be treated as equivalent to critical entities for the purposes of this Chapter. They shall apply the provisions of Articles 3, 4, 5(1) to (4) and (7), and 9 in respect of those entities.
Amendment 94 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. By [threefour years and six months after entry into force of this Directive], and every year thereafter, the single points of contact shall submit a summary report to the Commission and to the Critical Entities Resilience Group on the notifications received, including the number of notifications, the nature of notified incidents and the actions taken in accordance with Article 13(3).
Amendment 99 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ensure adequate physical protection of sensitive areas, facilities and other infrastructure, including fencing, barriers, perimeter monitoring tools and routines, as well as detection equipment, emergency call systems for the notification of competent authorities, and access controls;
Amendment 120 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall provide to the Critical Entities Resilience Group a summary report of the information provided by the Member States pursuant to Articles 3(3) and 4(4) by [threefour years and six months after entry into force of this Directive] and subsequently where necessary and at least every four years.
Amendment 124 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
By [5466 months after the entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Directive.
Amendment 128 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
The Commission shall, by [6 years after the entry into force of this Directive] carry out a review of the application of this Directive and sector-specific legislation. The review shall focus on identifying duplications/overlapping in the respective legislation, regulatory requirements or procedures, with a view to improve coherence and legal certainty between this Directive and the relevant sector-specific legislation. To this end, the Commission shall prepare a report which it shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied where necessary by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 129 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by [1824 months after entry into force of this Directive] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 130 #
2020/0365(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
They shall apply those provisions from [two year30 months after entry into force of this Directive + one day].
Amendment 13 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Responsible, transparent and diligent behaviour by providers of intermediary services is essential for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, for ensuring legal certainty and for allowing Union citizens and other persons to exercise their fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Charter’), in particular the freedom of expression and information and the freedom to conduct a business, and the right to non- discrimination.
Amendment 14 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Therefore, in order to safeguard and improve the functioning of the internal market, a targeted set of uniform, effective and proportionate mandatory rules should be established at Union level. This Regulation provides the conditions for innovative digital services to emerge and to scale up in the internal market. The approximation of national regulatory measures at Union level concerning the requirements for providers of intermediary services is necessary in order to avoid and put an end to fragmentation of the internal market and to ensure legal certaintycreate and maintain a safer environment and legal certainty for platforms, users and public authorities, thus reducing uncertainty for developers and fostering interoperability. By using requirements that are technology neutral, innovation should not be hampered but instead be stimulated.
Amendment 15 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation should apply to providers of certain information society services as defined in Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , that is, any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by electronic means and at the individual request of a recipient. Specifically, this Regulation should apply to providers of intermediary services, and in particular intermediary services consisting of services known as ‘mere conduit’, ‘caching’ and ‘hosting’ services, given that the exponential growth of the use made of those services, mainly for legitimate and socially beneficial purposes of all kinds, has also increased their role in the intermediation and spread of unlawful or otherwise harmful information and activities. In this regard, stresses the importance and the particularities of the transport and tourism online platform market, which require a sector-specific approach and special attention in this regard. _________________ 26Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
Amendment 17 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the rules laid down in this Regulation and a level playing field within the internal market, those rules should apply to providers of intermediary services irrespective of their place of establishment or residence, in so far as they provide services in the Union, as evidenced by a substantial connection to the Union. Considering that the digital economy, particularly platforms, can have a significant impact on long-established regulated business models in many strategic sectors such as transportation and hospitality, the Commission should foster a level-playing field between online platforms and traditional enterprises operating in the transport and tourism sectors.
Amendment 28 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) To avoid disproportionate burdens, the additional obligations imposed on online platforms under this Regulation should not apply to micro or small enterprises as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC of the Commission,41 unless their reach and impact is such that they meet the criteria to qualify as very large online platforms under this Regulation. This Regulation should highlights the importance of collaborative economy platforms in the Transport and Tourism sectors, on which services are provided by both individuals and professionals and avoid imposing disproportionate information obligations and unnecessary administrative burden on peer-to-peer providers of services. The consolidation rules laid down in that Recommendation help ensure that any circumvention of those additional obligations is prevented. The exemption of micro- and small enterprises from those additional obligations should not be understood as affecting their ability to set up, on a voluntary basis, a system that complies with one or more of those obligations. _________________ 41 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium- sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
Amendment 68 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 106 a (new)
Recital 106 a (new)
(106 a)In order to enhance the relationship between stakeholders and local authorities in the Short-Term Rental market and mobility services; this Regulation should aim to ensure legal certainty and clarity in this market by creating a governance framework formalising the cooperation between short-term rental and mobility platforms and national, regional and local authorities, aiming especially to share best practices and thus facilitating their daily business;
Amendment 69 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) rules on specific due diligence obligations tailored to certain specific categories of providers of intermediary services, taking into account the sector- specific business model;
Amendment 84 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘advertisement’ means information designed to promote the message of a legal or natural person, irrespective of whether to achieve commercial or non-commercial purposes, and displayed by an online platform on its online interface against remuneration specifically for promoting that information and that is not contingent on the completion of a given transaction;
Amendment 397 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of intermediary services shall include information on any restrictions that they impose in relation to the use of their service in respect of information provided by the recipients of the service, in their terms and conditions. That information shall include information on any policies, procedures, measures and tools used for the purpose of content moderation, including algorithmic decision-making and human review. It shall be set out in clear and, unambiguous, very easily comprehensible language and shall be publicly available in an easily accessible format.
Amendment 436 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of hosting services shall put mechanisms in place to allow any individual or entity to notify them of the presence on their hosting service of specific items of information that the individual or entity considers to be illegal content. Those mechanisms shall be easy to access, user- friendly, and allow for the submission of notices exclusively byon a case by case basis, exclusively by non-automated electronic means.
Amendment 480 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Paragraphs 2 and 4 shall not apply to providers of hosting services that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC.
Amendment 514 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The first subparagraph is without prejudice to the right of the recipient concerned to redress against the decision of the online platform before a court in accordance with the applicable law, as well as the right of the online platform concerned to redress against the decision of the out-of- court dispute settlement body before a court in accordance with the applicable law.
Amendment 620 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Very large online platforms shall identify, analyse and assess, from the date of application referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 25(4), at least once a year thereafter and always before launching new services, any significant systemic risks stemming from the design, functioning and use made of their services in the Union. This risk assessment shall be specific to their services and shall include the following systemic risks:
Amendment 727 #
2020/0361(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the natural or legal person on whose behalf the advertisement is displayed, unless that information concerns providers of intermediary services that qualify as micro, small or medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC;
Amendment 372 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) This Directive lays down minimum requirements, thus leaving untouched Member States' prerogative to introduce and maintain more favourable provisions. Rights acquired under the existing national legal framework in Sweden and Denmark should continue to apply, unless more favourable provisions are introduced by in accordance to the derogation in Article 1(3) and Article 16(2) of this Directive. The implementation of this Directive cannot be used to reduce existing rights for workers, nor can it constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection afforded to workers in the field covered by this Directive.
Amendment 389 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With a view to improving working and living conditions in the Union, this Directive establishes a framework for the promotion of:
Amendment 409 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) access of workers to minimum wage protection, in the form of wages set out byby promoting access to collective agreementsbargaining or in the form of a statutory minimum wage in Member States where it exists.
Amendment 421 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Nothing in this Directive shall be construed as imposing an obligation on the Member States where wage setting is ensured exclusivemainly via collective agreements to introduce a statutory minimum wage nor to make the collective agreements universally applicable or affect the contractual freedom of the social partners to negotiate, monitor and set wages through collective agreements. This Directive does not oblige Member States to grant access to minimum wage protection to all workers, nor shall it create any obligation on the Member States as regards the level or conditions for the setting of wages.
Amendment 573 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The national criteria referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least the following elementwhose relevance and relative weight shall be decided by Member States in accordance with their prevailing national socio-economic conditions:
Amendment 863 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, without prejudice to specific forms of redress and dispute resolution provided for, where applicable, in collective agreements, workers, including those whose employment relationship has ended, have access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and a right to redress, including adequate compensation, in the case of infringements of their rightsexisting national law or collective agreements provide for relating to statutory minimum wages or minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements and such rights have been infringed.
Amendment 880 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to protect workers, including those who are workers’ representatives, from any adverse treatment by the employer and from any adverse consequences resulting from a complaint lodged with the employer or resulting from any proceedings initiated with the aim of enforcing compliance with the rights relating to statutory minimum wages or minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements.provided for in existing national law or collective agreements relating to minimum wage protection
Amendment 271 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to provide Member States with additional time needed to deal with the situation of crisis and at the same time ensure an effective and as quick as possible access to the relevant procedures and rights, the Commission should authorise the application of the asylum crisis management procedure and the return crisis management procedure for a period of six months, which could be extended up to a period not exceeding one year. After the expiry of the relevant period, the extended deadlines provided for in the asylum and return crisis management procedures should not be applied to new applications for international protection.
Amendment 276 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
Amendment 295 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
Amendment 305 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
Amendment 312 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
Amendment 319 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
Amendment 328 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 341 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
Amendment 347 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
Amendment 352 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
Amendment 359 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 364 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
Amendment 422 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) an exceptional situation of mass influx of third-country nationals or stateless persons arriving irregularly inon the territory of a Member State or disembcomparked on its territory following search and rescue operations, being of such a scale, in proportion to the population and GDP of the Member State concerned, andto the overall situation in the Union the mass influx is of a nature, that it renders the Member State’swell- prepared asylum, reception orand return system non-functional and can have serious consequences for the functioning the Common European Asylum System or the Common Framework as set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], or
Amendment 427 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) an imminent risk of such a situation. which cannot be diminished by external dimension policies within the Union’s asylum and migration framework, including through the EU Migration Preparedness and Crisis Blueprint9a or before entry of the persons referred to in point (a). _________________ 9a Commission Recommendation of 23 September 2020 on an EU Mechanism for Preparedness and Management of Crises related to Migration (C(2020) 6469, 23.9.2020)
Amendment 428 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) an imminent risk of such a situation which cannot be diminished by immediate actions in the external dimension or before entry of those persons.
Amendment 444 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of providing solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State in situations where measures according to Chapter III of this Regulation are not sufficient for managing the situation of crisis as set out in Article 1(2)(a), Part IV of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management] shall apply mutatis mutandis, with the exception of Article 45(1), point (d), Article 47, Article 48, Article 49, Article 51(3)(b)(iii) and (4), Article 52(2) and (5) and Article 53(2), second and third subparagraphs7, Article 48 and Article 49.
Amendment 449 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management] the report referred to therein shall indicate whether the Member State concerned is in a situation of crisis as defined in Article 1(2)(a) of this Regulation or there is an imminent risk of such a situation as defined in Article 1(2)(b) of this Regulation.
Amendment 452 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5
Article 2 – paragraph 5
Amendment 458 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6
Article 2 – paragraph 6
Amendment 461 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. By way of derogation from Article 54 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], the share calculated in accordance with the formula set out in that Article shall also apply to measures set out in Article 45(2), points (a) and (b) of that Regulation.
Amendment 516 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a Extension of registration time limit set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation] 1. In a situation of crisis, applications made within the period during which this Article is applied shall be registered no later than four weeks from when they are made by way of derogation from Article 27 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation].
Amendment 519 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 b (new)
Article 3 b (new)
Article 3 b Extension of time limit for screening procedures 1. By way of derogation from Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Screening Regulation], the period during which a screening procedure is carried out may be extended by five days.
Amendment 535 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) By way of derogation from Article 41(11) and (13) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], the maximum duration of the border procedure for the examination of applications set out in that Article may be prolonged by an additional period of maximum eight weeks. Following this period, the applicant shall be authorised to enter the Member State’s territory for the completion of the procedure for international protection. The applicant may be detained under the conditions laid down by Directive XXX/XXX/EU [Reception Conditions Directive recast].
Amendment 558 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) In addition to the cases provided for by Article 6(2) of Directive XXX [recast Return Directive], Member States shall establish that a risk of absconding is presumed in an individual case, unless proven otherwise, when the criterion referred to in Article 6(1), point (f) of Directive XXX [recast Return Directive] is fulfilled or when the applicant, third- country national or stateless person concerned is manifestly and persistently not fulfilling the obligation to cooperate established by Article 7 of that Directive.
Amendment 572 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a (new)
Amendment 573 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 b (new)
Article 6 b (new)
Amendment 578 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Where a Member State is facing a situation of force majeure which renders it impossible to comply with the time limits set out in Article 27 and Article 34 (2) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], that Member State shall notify the Commission. After such notification, by way of derogation from Article 27 and Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], applications may be registered by that Member State no later than four weeks from when they are made and an examination of the applications on the merits shall be concluded not later than one year. In the notification, the Member State concerned shall indicate the precise reasons for which it considers that this paragraph has to be applied and indicate the period of time during which it will be applied.
Amendment 581 #
2020/0277(COD)
Article 7 a Extension of time limits set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Eurodac] The time limit of 72 hours for transmitting biometric data set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Eurodac Regulation] shall be extended up to 7 days.
Amendment 588 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Where a Member State is facing a situation of force majeure which renders it impossible to receive persons it is responsible for pursuant to Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], it shall notify the other Member States and the Commission, indicating the precise reasons for such impossibility. In such cases, the requesting or notifying Member State shall not carry out the transfer until the Member State responsible is no longer facing a situation of force majeure. Where, because of the persistence of the situation of force majeure or for any other reason, the transfer does not take place within onetwo years of the acceptance of the take charge request or of the confirmation of the take back notification by another Member State or of the final decision on an appeal or review of a transfer decision where there is a suspensive effect in accordance with Article 33(3) of that Regulation, by way of derogation from Article 35 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], the Member State responsible shall be relieved of its obligations to take charge of or to take back the person concerned and responsibility shall be transferred to the requesting or notifying Member State.
Amendment 43 #
2020/0268(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) A DLT multilateral trading facility should be a multilateral system, operated by an investment firm or a market operator authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU, that has received a specific permission under Regulation (EU) xx/20xx of the European Parliament and of the Council27 [Proposal for a regulation on a pilot regime on DLT market infrastructure]. DLT multilateral trading facilities should be subject to all the requirements applicable to a multilateral trading facility under that Directive, except if it were to be granted an exemption by its national competent authority in accordance with this Directive. One potential regulatory barrier to the development of a multilateral trading facility for transferable securities issued on a DLT could be the obligation of intermediation set out in Directive 2014/65/EU. A traditional multilateral trading facility can only admit as members and participants investment firms, credit institutions and other persons who have a sufficient level of trading ability and competence and who dispose of appropriate organisational arrangements and resources. A DLT multilateral trading facility should be allowed to request a derogation from such an obligation so that is can provide retail investors with easy access to the trading venue, provided that adequate safeguards are in place in terms of investor protection. _________________ 27 [full title] (OJ L […], […], p. […]).
Amendment 52 #
2020/0268(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2014/65/EU
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. However, where the investment firm or market operatoran entity operates a distributed ledger technology multilateral trading facility (“DLT multilateral trading facility”) as defined in Article 2(3) of Regulation xx/20xx [proposal for a regulation on a pilot regime for DLT market infrastructure], the competent authority may permit that, under its rules governing access as referred to in Article 18(3) and for a maximum of four years, the investment firm or market operatorentity operating a DLT multilateral trading facility admits natural persons to the DLT multilateral trading facility as members or participants, provided that those persons fulfil the following requirements:
Amendment 165 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) A DLT MTF should be a multilateral trading facility that is operated by an entity, including but not limited to an investment firm or a market operator that operate the business or a regulated market and maybe the regulated market itself, authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, MiFID II), and that has received a specific permission under this Regulation. Such a DLT MTF should be subject to all the requirements applicable to a multilateral trading facility under the framework of Directive 2014/65/EU (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, MiFID II), Regulation EU No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation, MiFIR)41 , or any other EU financial services legislation, except if it has been granted one or several exemptions by its national competent authority, in accordance with this Regulation and Directive (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council42 . _________________ 41Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84) 42Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EU, 2011/61/EU, EU/2013/36, 2014/65/EU, (EU) 2015/2366 and EU/2016/2341 - COM(2020)596
Amendment 168 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Entities that are not authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU should be allowed to apply for a specific permission under this Regulation to operate a DLT MTF, following a fast-track procedure.
Amendment 173 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) A DLT securities settlement system should be an entity, including but not limited to a securities settlement system operated by a CSD authorised under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 (the Central Securities Depositories Regulation) that has received a specific permission under this Regulation. A DLT securities settlement system, and the CSDentity operating it, should be subject to the relevant requirements of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 (the Central Securities Depository Regulation), except where the national competent authority has granted the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system with one or several exemptions, in accordance with this Regulation.
Amendment 176 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) Entities that are not authorised under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 should be allowed to apply for a specific permission under this Regulation to operate a DLT securities settlement system, following a fast-track procedure.
Amendment 179 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) A DLT MTF or a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system should only admit to trading or record DLT transferable securities on their distributed ledger. DLT transferable securities should be crypto-assets that qualify as ‘transferable securities’ within the meaning of Directive 2014/65/EU (the Market in Financial Instruments Directive, MiFID II) and that are issued, transferred and stored on a distributed ledger.
Amendment 183 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to allow innovation and experimentation in a sound regulatory environment while preserving financial stability, the type of transferable securities admitted to trading on a DLT MTF or recorded in a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system should be limited to securities, such as shares and bonds that are not liquid. In order to determine whether a share or bond is liquid or not, this Regulation should set some value thresholds. To avoid the creation of any risk to financial stability, the total market value of DLT transferable securities recorded by a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system, or admitted to trading by a DLT MTF, should also be limited. DLT market infrastructures should also be prevented from admitting to trading or recording on the distributed ledger sovereign bonds. To verify that the DLT transferable securities traded on or recorded by a DLT market infrastructure meets the conditions imposed under this Regulation, national competent authorities should be allowed to require such DLT market infrastructures to submit reports.
Amendment 193 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) To be granted an exemption under this Regulation, the DLT MTF should demonstrate that the exemption is proportionate and limited to the use of DLT as described in its business plan and that the exemption requested is limited to the DLT MTF and, where the entity operating the DLT MTF is an investment firm or a market operator, not extended to any other MTF operated by the same investment firm or market operator.
Amendment 195 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) A CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system should be able to request one or several exemptions on a temporary basis, as listed under this Regulation, to be granted by the relevant competent authority, if it complied with the conditions to such exemptions as well as additional requirements to address novel forms of risks raised by the use of DLT. The CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system should comply with any compensatory measure imposed by the competent authority in order to meet the objectives pursued by the provision for which an exemption has been requested.
Amendment 199 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 (the Central Securities Depositories Regulation), a CSD can only outsource one of its core activities, after receiving an authorisation from the competent authority. The CSD is also required to respect several conditions, so that the outsourcing does not result in a delegation of its responsibility or in a modification of the obligations of the CSD towards its participants or issuers. Depending on its business plan, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system could be willing to share the responsibility of running itsthe distributed ledger on which the transferable securities are recorded with other entities, including with its participants. The DLT securities settlement system should be able to request an exemption from the outsourcing requirements to develop such innovative business models. In such a case, they should demonstrate that the provisions on outsourcing are incompatible with the use of DLT as envisaged in their business plan and they should also demonstrate that some minimum requirements on outsourcing are met.
Amendment 209 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) A CSDWhere they use a proprietary DLT, an entity operating a DLT securities settlement system, or DLT MTF where they are permitted to settle the transactions in DLT transferable securities themselves, should establish the rules on the functioning of the proprietary DLT they operate, including the rules to access and admission on the DLT, the rules for the participating nodes and the rules to address potential conflicts of interest, as well as risk management measures. Where they use a public DLT, an entity operating a DLT securities settlement system, or DLT MTF where they are permitted to settle the transactions in DLT transferable securities themselves, should properly describe to the relevant competent authority the functioning of the DLT they use, the way they address potential conflicts of interest, as well as risk management measures.
Amendment 220 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The specific permission granted to a DLT market infrastructure should follow the same procedures as the authorisation of a traditional MTF, where the entity operating the DLT MTF is an investment firm or a market operator, or a CSD where such a CSD is seeking to operate a new securities settlement system. However, when applying for a permission, the applicant DLT infrastructure should indicate the exemptions it would be seeking. Before granting a permission to a DLT market infrastructure, the competent authority should consult ESMA. ESMA should issue a non-binding opinion and make any recommendationscompetent authorities should put in place fast track procedures for entities not authorised as an MTF or as a CSD at the time onf their application for the exemptions requested. ESMA should also consult the competent authorities of the other Member States. Where issuing its non-binding opinion, ESMA should aim at ensuring financial stability, market integrity and investor protection. In order to ensure the level- a specific permission under this Regulation. When applaying field and fair competition across the single market, ESMA’s non-binding opinion should also aim at ensuring the consistency and proportionality of the exemptions granted by different competent authorities across the Unionor a permission, the applicant DLT infrastructure should indicate the exemptions it would be seeking.
Amendment 244 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
(1) This Regulation lays down requirements on multilateral trading facilities and securities settlemententities systems using distributed ledger technology ‘DLT market infrastructures’, which are granted with a specific permissions to operate in accordance with Article 7 and Article 8.
Amendment 251 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
(3) ‘DLT multilateral trading facility’ or ‘DLT MTF’ means a ‘multilateral trading facility’, operated by an investment firm or a market operator, that only admits to trading DLT transferable securities and that may be permitted, on the basis of transparent, non-discretionary, uniform rules and procedures, to:
Amendment 253 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘DLT securities settlement system’ means a securities settlement system, operated by a ‘central securities depository’, that settles transactions in DLT transferable securities against payment;
Amendment 262 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – introductory part
(13) ‘sovereign bond’ means a bond issued by a sovereign issuer which is either:ithin the meaning of Article 4(1) point (60) of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 263 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point a
Amendment 264 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point b
Amendment 265 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 – point c
Amendment 270 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point b a (new)
(b a) an entity operating a DLT MTF that is neither an investment firm nor a market operator, the Member State in which the entity is registered or, if under the law of that Member State it has no registered office, the Member State in which the head office of the operator is situated;
Amendment 271 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point c a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point c a (new)
(c a) an entity operating a DLT securities settlement system that is not a CSD, the Member State in which the operator is registered or, if under the law of that Member State it has no registered office, the Member State in which the head office of the operator is situated;
Amendment 290 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The total market value of DLT transferable securities recorded in a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system shall not exceed EUR 2.5 billion. Where a DLT MTF records the DLT transferable securities instead of a CSD, in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 4, the total market value of the DLT transferable securities recorded by the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF shall not exceed EUR 2.5 billion.
Amendment 293 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. By way of derogation, corporate bonds issued by issuers whose market capitalisation did not exceed EUR 1 billion at the time of their issuance shall be excluded from the calculation of the threshold set out in paragraphs (1)(b) and (3).
Amendment 294 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) determined daily, either by the CSD or the investment firm or market operatorentity concerned; and
Amendment 303 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A DLT MTF shall be subject to all the requirements applicable to an MTF under Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 2014/600, except if the investment firm or the market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF:
Amendment 307 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. At its request, an investment firm or a market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF may be permitted to admit to trading DLT transferable securities that are not recorded in a CSD in accordance with Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) 909/2014 but instead recorded on the DLT MTF’s distributed ledgerused by the DLT MTF.
Amendment 309 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
An investment firm or market operatorentity requesting an exemption pursuant to paragraph 1 shall propose compensatory measures to meet the objectives pursued by the provisions from which an exemption is requested, and ensure at a minimum:
Amendment 310 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) that the DLT MTF keeps records which enable the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF, without delay at any given time, to segregate the DLT transferable securities of a member, participant, issuer or client from those of any other member, participant, issuer or client.
Amendment 315 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where an investment firm or a market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF has requested an exemption under paragraph 2, it shall ensure, by means of robust procedures and arrangements that, the DLT MTF:
Amendment 318 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) guarantees that the number of DLT transferable securities in an issue or in part of an issue admitted by the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF, is equal to the sum of DLT transferable securities making up such an issue or part of an issue, recorded on the DLT, at any given time;
Amendment 324 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – paragraph 2
Where settlement occurs through commercial bank money or e-money tokens, the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF shall identify, measure, monitor, manage, and minimise any counterparty risk arising from the use of such money; and
Amendment 328 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Where an investment firm or a market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF requests an exemption in accordance with paragraph 2 or with Directive (EU) .../...54 , it shall in any case demonstrate that the exemption requested is: _________________ 54Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EU, 2011/61/EU, EU/2013/36, 2014/65/EU, (EU) 2015/2366 and EU/2016/2341 - - COM(2020)596
Amendment 329 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) limited to the DLT MTF and does not extended to any other MTF operated by the said investment firm or market operatorentity.
Amendment 330 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. An entity that is not subject to all the requirements applicable to an MTF under Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 2014/600 at the time of its application for a specific permission shall be allowed to apply in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article. Competent authorities shall put in place specific procedures for entities that are not subject to all the requirements applicable to an MTF under Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 2014/600 at the time of their application.
Amendment 332 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system shall be subject to the requirements applicable to a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, except if such a CSDn entity:
Amendment 335 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. At its request, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system may be exempted by the competent authority from the application of Article 2(4) on dematerialised form, Article 2(9) on transfer of orders, Article 2(28) on securities accounts, Article 3 on the recording of securities, Article 37 on the integrity of issue, Article 38 on the segregation of assets of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system:
Amendment 342 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. At its request, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system may be exempted by the competent authority from the application of Article 19 and Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that:
Amendment 343 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) such provisions are incompatible with the use of a DLT as envisaged by the particular DLT operated by the CSDentity concerned; and
Amendment 344 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system ensures that the conditions set out in points (c) to (i) of Article 30(1) and in Article 30(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 are complied with.
Amendment 345 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. At its request, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system may be exempted by the competent authority from the application of Article 2(19) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 on participants and may be permitted to admit as participants natural and legal persons other than those referred to in Article 2(19), provided that such persons:
Amendment 347 #
2020/0267(COD)
5. At its request, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system may be exempted by the competent authority from the application of Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 on cash settlement, provided that the CSDentity ensures delivery versus payment.
Amendment 356 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Where settlement occurs through commercial bank money or e-money tokens, the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF shall identify, measure, monitor, manage, and minimise any counterparty risk arising from the use of such money.
Amendment 357 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. At its request, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system may be exempted by the competent authority from the application of Articles 50 and/or Article 53 on standard link access and access between a CSD and another market infrastructure of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that it demonstrates that the use of a DLT is incompatible with legacy systems of other CSDs or other market infrastructures or that granting such access to another CSD or another market infrastructure using legacy systems would trigger disproportionate costs, given the size of the DLT securities settlement system.
Amendment 360 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Where a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system has requested an exemption in accordance with the first sub-paragraph, it shall give access to other CSDentities operating a DLT securities settlement system or to DLT MTFs.
Amendment 361 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Where a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system requests an exemption in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 6, it shall in any case demonstrate that:
Amendment 365 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the exemption requested is limited to the DLT securities settlement system and does not extend to any other securities settlement system as defined in Article 2(10) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 operated by the same CSDentity.
Amendment 368 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8
Article 5 – paragraph 8
8. Where a CSDn entity has requested and been granted an exemption under paragraph 3, the requirement in Article 39(1) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014/EU for Member States to designate and notify the securities settlement system operated by the CSDentity in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC shall not apply to the DLT securities settlement system. The foregoing shall not preclude Member States from designating and notifying a DLT securities settlement system in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC where the DLT securities settlement system fulfils all of the requirements of that Directive.
Amendment 369 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. An entity that is not subject to the requirements applicable to a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 at the time of the application for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF under this Regulation, shall be allowed to apply in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 8 of this Article. Competent authorities shall put in place specific procedures for entities that are not subject to the requirements applicable to a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 at the time of their application.
Amendment 380 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. A CSDWhere they use a proprietary DLT, an entity operating a DLT securities settlement system, and an investment firm or a market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF requesting an exemption from Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, shall establish rules on the functioning of the DLT they operate, including the rules for accessing the distributed ledger technology, the participation of the validating nodes, addressing potential conflicts of interest, and risk management including any mitigation measures.
Amendment 385 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where an entity operating a DLT securities settlement system and an entity operating a DLT MTF use a public DLT and request an exemption from Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, they shall properly describe to the relevant competent authority the functioning of the DLT they use, the way they address potential conflicts of interest, and risk management measures.
Amendment 393 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Amendment 409 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Within three months of receipt of the notification, ESMA shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the application and shall make any recommendations on the exemptions requested by the applicant, that are necessary to ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability. ESMA shall also promote the consistency and proportionality of exemptions granted by competent authorities to investment firms or market operatorentities operating DLT MTFs across the Union. In order to do so, ESMA, shall consult the competent authorities of the other Member States in a timely manner and take the utmost account of their views in its opinion.
Amendment 411 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The specific permission granted to either an investment firm or a market operatoran entity to operate a DLT MTF shall be valid throughout the Union for up to six years from the date of the specific permission. It shall specify the exemptions that are granted, in accordance with Article 4.
Amendment 417 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) the investment firm or market operatorentity operating the DLT MTF has breached the conditions attached to the exemptions granted by the competent authority;
Amendment 418 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) the investment firm or market operator,entity operating a DLT MTF has admitted to trading financial instruments that do not fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 3(1) and 3(2);
Amendment 419 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) the investment firm or market operator,entity operating a DLT MTF, that has requested an exemption from Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, has recorded DLT transferable securities that do not fulfil the conditions laid down in Article 3(1) and 3(2);
Amendment 420 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point e
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point e
(e) the investment firm or market operator,entity operating a DLT MTF, that has requested specific permission to be exempted from Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, has exceeded the thresholds referred to in Article 3(3) or (5), third subparagraph; or
Amendment 421 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point f
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point f
(f) the competent authority becomes aware that the investment firm or market operatorentity that applied for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF, obtained such permission or related exemptions on the basis of misleading information including any material omission.
Amendment 423 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Where in the course of its activity, an investment firm or a market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF proposes to introduces a material change to the functioning of the DLT, or to its services or activities, which requires a new permission, a new exemption, or the modification of one or more of its existing exemptions or of any conditions attached to it, it shall request such permission, exemption or modification in accordance with Article 4. Such permission, exemption or modification shall be processed by the competent authority, in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 425 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the functioning of its proprietarythe DLT as referred to in Article 6(2) and (2a);
Amendment 442 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) a flaw has been discovered in the functioning of the DLT or in the services and activities provided by the CSDentity operating a DLT securities settlement system that poses a risk to market integrity, investor protection or financial stability, which outweighs the benefits of the services and activities under experimentation; or
Amendment 443 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system has breached the conditions attached to the exemptions granted by the competent authority; or
Amendment 444 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlements system has recorded financial instruments that do not fulfil the conditions laid down Article 3(1) and (2); or
Amendment 445 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point d
(d) the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlements system has exceeded the thresholds referred to in Article 3(3) and (5), third subparagraph; or
Amendment 446 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point e
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – point e
(e) the competent authority becomes aware that the CSDentity operating the DLT securities settlement system that applied for a specific permission to operate a DLT securities settlement system, obtained such permission or related exemptions on the basis of misleading information including any material omission.
Amendment 447 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Where in the course of its activity, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system proposes to introduces a material change to the functioning of the DLT, or to its services or activities, which require a new permission, a new exemption or the modification of one or more of its existing exemptions or of any attached conditions, it shall request such permission, exemption or modification, in accordance with Article 5. Such permission, exemption or modification, shall be processed by the competent authority, in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 448 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Where in the course of its activity, a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system requests a new permission or exemption, it shall request such permission or exemption, in accordance with Article 5. Such permission or exemption or modification shall be processed by the competent authority, in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 460 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the number and value of DLT transferable securities admitted to trading on the DLT MTF, the number and value of DLT transferable securities recorded by a CSDn entity operating DLT securities settlement systems, and where applicable, the number and value of transferable securities recorded by an investment firm or market operatorentity operating on a DLT MTF;
Amendment 462 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the number and value of transactions traded on a DLT MTF and settled either by a CSDn entity operating a DLT securities settlement system, or where applicable, by an investment firm or market operatorentity operating a DLT MTF;
Amendment 471 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the number of DLT MTFs and CSDentities operating a DLT securities settlement system which have been granted a specific permission under this Regulation;
Amendment 473 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the number and value of DLT transferable securities admitted to trading on DLT MTFs, the number and value of DLT transferable securities recorded by CSDentities operating DLT securities settlement systems, and where applicable, the number and value of transferable securities recorded by DLT MTFs;
Amendment 475 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the number and value of transactions traded on DLT MTFs and settled by CSDentities operating DLT securities settlement system, and where applicable, by DLT MTFs;
Amendment 158 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The use of ICT has in the last decades gained a pivotal role in finance, assuming today critical relevance in the operation of typical daily functions of all financial entities. Digitalisation covers, for instance, payments, which have increasingly moved from cash and paper- based methods to the use of digital solutions, as well as securities clearing and settlement, electronic and algorithmic trading, lending and funding operations, peer-to-peer finance, credit rating, insurance underwriting, claim management and back-office operations. The insurance sector has also been transformed by the use of ICT technology, from the emergence of digital insurance intermediaries operating with InsurTech to digital insurance underwriting and contract distributions. Finance has not only become largely digital throughout the whole sector, but digitalisation has also deepened interconnections and dependencies within the financial sector and with third-party infrastructure and service providers.
Amendment 170 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 – point 1
Recital 17 – point 1
ESAs and national competent authorities, respectively should be able to participate in the strategic policy discussions and the technical workings of the NIS Cooperation Group, respectively, exchanges information and further cooperate with the single points of contact designated under Directive (EU) 2016/1148. The competent authorities under this Regulation should also consult and cooperate with the national CSIRTs designated in accordance with Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/1148, in particular when finalising the Oversight plan for, or recommendations addressed to, critical ICT third-party service providers, in order to ensure that there are no inconsistencies or duplications with critical ICT third- party service providers' obligations under Directive (EU) 2016/1148.
Amendment 507 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) an initial notification, without delay, but no later than the end of the business day, or, in case of a major24 hours after the ICT- related incident that took place later than 2 hours before the end of the business day, not later than 4 hours from the beginning of the next business dais classified as major by the financial entity, or, where reporting channels are not available, as soon as they become available;
Amendment 512 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) a final report, when the root cause analysis has been completed, regardless of whether or not mitigation measures have already been implemented, and when the actual impact figures are available to replace estimates, but not later than one month from the moment of sending the initial reportday of sending the initial report. In duly justified cases, and following agreement with the competent authority, financial entities may deviate from the deadline laid down in this point.
Amendment 595 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – introductory part
8. Financial entities shall ensure that contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services are terminallow the financial entity to terminate the arrangement under applicable law, after all other remedies have been exhausted, at least under the following circumstances:
Amendment 693 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. When preparing the Oversight plan, the Joint Oversight Executive body shall consult all relevant competent authorities and single points of contact referred to in Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2016/1148 to ensure that there are no inconsistencies or duplications with the critical ICT third-party service provider's obligations under Directive (EU) 2016/1148.
Amendment 700 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The powers referred to in the first subparagraph shall primarily be used in respect of the critical or important services provided by the critical ICT third- party service provider to financial entities, but may also be used in respect of other services provided to financial entities when necessary.
Amendment 704 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. When preparing the recommendations, the Joint Oversight Executive body shall consult all relevant competent authorities and single points of contact referred to in Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2016/1148 to ensure there are no inconsistencies or duplications with the critical ICT third-party service provider's obligations under Directive (EU) 2016/1148
Amendment 727 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. Within 30 calendar days after the receipt of the recommendations issued by Lead Overseersthe Joint Oversight Executive Body pursuant to point (d) of Article 31(1), critical ICT third-party service providers shall notify the LeadJoint Overseeright Executive Body whether they intend to follow those recommendations. Lead OverseersThe Joint Oversight Executive Body shall immediately transmit this information to competent authorities.
Amendment 737 #
2020/0266(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 37 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. When tmaking those drecisions referred to in paragraph 3, competent authoritiesommendations, the Joint Oversight Executive Body shall take into account the type and magnitude of risk that is not addressed by the critical ICT third-party service provider, as well as the seriousness of the non-compliance, having regard to the following criteria:
Amendment 17 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) In practice, DLT refers to the protocols and supporting infrastructure that enable nodes in a network to propose, validate, and record state changes(or updates) consistently across the network’s nodes – without the need to rely on a central trusted party to obtain reliable data. DLT is built upon public-key cryptography, a cryptographic system that uses pairs of keys: public keys, which are publicly known and essential for identification, and private keys, which are kept secret and are used for authentication and encryption.
Amendment 22 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) A crypto-asset can be seen as an asset that depends primarily on cryptography and DLT or similar technology as part of its perceived or inherent value, that is neither issued nor guaranteed by a central bank or public authority, and that can be used as a means of exchange and/or for investment purposes.
Amendment 71 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In order to ensure consumer protection, prospective purchasers of crypto-assets should be informed about the characteristics, functions and risks of crypto-assets they intend to purchase. When making a public offer of crypto- assets in the Union or when seeking admission of crypto-assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets, issuers of crypto-assets should produce, notify to their competent authority and publish an information document (‘a crypto-asset white paper’) containing mandatory disclosures. Such crypto-asset white paper should contain general information on the issuer and offeror, when different, on the project to be carried out with the capital raised, on the public offer of crypto-assets or on their admission to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets, on the rights and obligations attached to the crypto-assets, on the underlying technology used for such assets and on the related risks. To ensure fair and non- discriminatory treatment of holders of crypto-assets, the information in the crypto-asset white paper, and where applicable in any marketing communications related to the public offer, shall be fair, clear and not misleading.
Amendment 115 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) To ensure that asset-referenced tokens are mainly used as a means of exchange and not as a store of value, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, and any crypto-asset service providers, should not grant interests to users of asset- referenced tokens for time such users are holding those asset-referenced tokens. Some asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens should be considered significant due to the potential large customer base of their promoters and shareholders, their potential high market capitalisation, the potential size of the reserve of assets backing the value of such asset-referenced tokens or e- money tokens, the potential high number of transactions, the potential interconnectedness with the financial system or the potential cross- border use of such crypto-assets. Significant asset- referenced tokens or significant e-money tokens, that could be used by a large number of holders and which could raise specific challenges in terms of financial stability, monetary policy transmission or monetary sovereignty, should be subject to more stringent requirements than other asset- referenced tokens or e-money tokens.
Amendment 118 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
Amendment 119 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The crypto-asset white paper produced by an issuer or offeror of e- money tokens should contain all the relevant information concerning that issuer, when known, the offeror and the offer of e- money tokens or their admission to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets that is necessary to enable potential buyers to make an informed purchase decision and understand the risks relating to the offer of e-money tokens. The crypto- asset white paper should also explicitly indicate that holders of e-money tokens are provided with a claim in the form of a right to redeem their e-money tokens against fiat currency at par value and at any moment.
Amendment 151 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point a
Article 1 – point a
(a) transparency and disclosure requirements for the issuance, offering and admission to trading on a trading platform of crypto-assets;
Amendment 152 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point b
Article 1 – point b
(b) the authorisation and supervision of crypto-asset service providers and issuers ofand offerors of both asset-referenced tokens and issuers of electronic money tokens;
Amendment 155 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 –point c
Article 1 –point c
(c) the operation, organisation and governance of issuers and offerors of asset-referenced tokens, issuers and offerors of electronic money tokens and crypto-asset service providers;
Amendment 158 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to persons that are engaged in the issuance or offering of crypto- assets for the purpose of trading or provideing services related to crypto- assets trading in the Union.
Amendment 163 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) 'hybrid tokens', which combine elements of financial instruments as defined in paragraph 2(a) of this article, with elements of crypto-assets, thereby creating a hybrid 'financial crypto-asset';
Amendment 164 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Amendment 165 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) funds, other than e-money tokens, included in a payments account as defined in Article 4 (12) of Directive 2015/2366/EU;
Amendment 179 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the provisions of chapter I of Title III, except Articles 21 and 22 and the information specified in Article 16(2)(c)- (o).;
Amendment 183 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. Where providing one or more crypto-asset services, credit institutions authorised under Directive 2013/36/EU shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter I of Title V, except the information specified in Article 54.2(d-r), Articles 57 and 58.
Amendment 184 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 185 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Where providing one or more crypto asset services, the management company of a UCITS authorised under Directive 2009/65/EC or an alternative fund investment manager authorised under Directive 2011/61/EU should not be subject to the provisions of chapter I of Title V, except the information specified in Article 54.2(d-r), Articles 57 and 58.
Amendment 187 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Investment firms authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter I of Title V, except the information specified in Article 54.2(d-r), Articles 57, 58, 60 and 61, where they only provide one or several crypto- asset services equivalent to the investment services and activities for which they are authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU. For that purpose:
Amendment 192 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘distributed ledger technology’ or ‘DLT’ means a type of technology that support the distributed recording of encrypted data;
Amendment 195 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘crypto-asset’ means a digital representation of value or rights for direct investment or finance purposes that use cryptography for security and are coins or tokens of distributed ledgers, and which may be transferred and stored electronically, using distributed ledger technology or similar technology;
Amendment 204 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘electronic money token’ or ‘e- money token’ means a type of crypto-asset the main purpose of which is to be used as a means of exchange and that purports to maintain a stable value by referring to the value of a fiat currency that is legal tendermaintaining a portfolio which ensures that the token maintains the value of a fiat currency that is legal tender; e-money tokens which maintain the value of a fiat currency of the Union shall be deemed to be electronic money as defined in Article 2 (2) of Directive 2009/110/EC;
Amendment 210 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘utility token’ means a type of crypto-asset that is used for purposes other than as a means of payment or exchange for external goods or services and which is intended to provide digital access to a good or service, available on DLT, and is only accepted by the issuer of that token;
Amendment 212 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5a) 'financial market infrastructures' (FMIs) means payment systems, central securities depositories, securities settlement systems, central counterparties and trade repositories;
Amendment 216 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘issuer of crypto-assets’ means a legal personnatural person , a legal person or other entity being subject of rights and obligations, who offers to the public any type of crypto-assets or seeks the admission of such crypto-assets to a trading platform for crypto-assets;
Amendment 221 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) an 'offeror of crypto-assets' means a legal entity which offers any type of crypto-assets or asks for admission to trading of crypto-assets on a trading platform for crypto-assets;
Amendment 232 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7a) "funds" means funds as defined in Article 4, point (25), of Directive (EU) 2015/2366;
Amendment 268 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. No issuer or offeror of crypto- assets, other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, shall, in the Union, offer such crypto-assets to the public, or seek an admission of such crypto-assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets, unless that issuer or offeror:
Amendment 269 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) is a legal entity, a natural person having its residence in the Union, or other entity established or having seat in the Union and subject to the rights and obligations of the Union;
Amendment 284 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the crypto-assets are offered to fewer than 1500 natural or legal persons per Member State where such persons are acting on their own account;
Amendment 287 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) over a period of 12 months, the total consideration of an offer to the public of crypto-assets in the Union does not exceed EUR 18 000 000, or the equivalent amount in another currency or in crypto- assets;
Amendment 295 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of point (a), crypto-assets shall not be considered to be offered for free where purchasers are required to provide or to undertake to provide personal data to the issuer or offeror in exchange for those crypto-assets, or where the issuer or offeror of those crypto-assets receives from the prospective holders of those crypto-assets any third party fees, commissions, monetary benefits or non- monetary benefits in exchange for those crypto-assets.
Amendment 296 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where utility tokens in operation are offered to third parties for the sole purpose of ensuring access to the relevant good or service, they may be offered directly by issuers or offerors to third parties.
Amendment 309 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a detailed description of the issuer and offeror, when different, and a presentation of the main participants involved in the project's design and development;
Amendment 321 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a detailed description of the rights and obligations attached to the crypto- assets and the procedures and conditions forby which the issuer, offeror and the consumer may exercisinge those rights;
Amendment 371 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Issuers of crypto-assets, other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, shall offer a right of withdrawal to any consumer who buys such crypto-assets directly from the issuer or from a crypto- asset service provider placing crypto-assets on behalf of that issuer, and in case of modification of the white paper by the issuer.
Amendment 492 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) EUR 35200 000;
Amendment 601 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 672 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
An e-money token offered to the public in the Union or admitted to trading on a trading platform of crypto-assets may reference a fiat currency of legal tender other than a currency of the Union.
Amendment 676 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) if the average outstanding amount of e-money tokens does not exceed EUR 5 000 000, or the corresponding equivalent in another fiat currency, over a period of 12 months, calculated at the end of each calendar day.
Amendment 677 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 702 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45
Article 45
Amendment 706 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a description of the issuer(s) of e- money tokens, when known;
Amendment 708 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) a description of the offeror of e- money tokens;
Amendment 709 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a detailed description of the issuer’s project, and a presentation of the main participants involved in the project's design and development, when known;
Amendment 712 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the risks relating to the issuer of(s) of the e- money issuertokens, the offeror of the e- money tokens, the e-money tokens and the implementation of the project, including the technology;
Amendment 734 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities of the issuer’ or offeror's home Member State shall provide the EBA with information on the criteria referred to in Article 39(1) of this Article and specified in accordance with Article 39(6) on at least a yearly basis.
Amendment 737 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3
Article 50 – paragraph 3
3. Where the EBA is of the opinion that e-money tokens meet the criteria referred to in Article 39(1), as specified in accordance with Article 39(6), the EBA shall prepare a draft decision to that effect and notify that draft decision to the issuers or offerors of those e-money tokens and the competent authority of the issuer’ or offeror's home Member State. The EBA shall give issuers or offerors of such e- money tokens and their competent authorities the opportunity to provide observations and comments in writing prior the adoption of its final decision. The EBA shall duly consider those observations and comments.
Amendment 741 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4
Article 50 – paragraph 4
4. The EBA shall take its final decision on whether an e-money token is a significant e-money token within three months after the notification referred to in paragraph 3 and immediately notify the issuers or offerors of such e-money tokens and their competent authorities thereof.
Amendment 924 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 8
Article 68 – paragraph 8
8. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised for the operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets shall complete the final settlement of a crypto-asset transaction on the DLT on the same date aswithin 72hrs of the transactions has been being executed on the trading platform.
Amendment 933 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 10 a (new)
Article 68 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised as offerors for the operation of a trading platform and of certain crypto-assets, shall ensure compliance with publication and audit requirements as laid down in this Regulation by having a dedicated page on their website and/or app on the crypto- assets that they offer.
Amendment 934 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 3
Article 69 – paragraph 3
3. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised for exchanging crypto-assets against fiat currency or other crypto-assets shall, if no fixed price has been agreed, execute the clients' orders at the average prices displayed atbetween the time of their receipt and the time of the execution of the order.
Amendment 971 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1
Article 77 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers and offerors of crypto- assets shall inform the public as soon as possible of inside information which concerns them, in a manner that enables the public to access that information in an easy manner and to assess that information in a complete, correct and timely manner.
Amendment 978 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Issuers and offerors of crypto- assets may, on their own responsibility, delay disclosure to the public of inside information provided that all of the following conditions are met:
Amendment 981 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) immediate disclosure is likely to prejudice the legitimate interests of the issuers or offerors;
Amendment 989 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the issuers or offerors are able to ensure the confidentiality of that information.
Amendment 1127 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 122 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 122 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) an assessment of whether the scope of crypto-asset services covered by this Regulation is appropriate and whether any adjustment to the definitions set out in this Regulation is needed, and whether any additional innovative crypto-asset forms would need to be added to this regulation;
Amendment 1144 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 123 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 123 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. By way of derogation from this Regulation, crypto-assets that are issued or made available and/or traded in the EU or admitted to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets on or after [please insert the date of entry into application of this Regulation] in accordance with the laws applicable to such crypto assets prior to the date of application of this Regulation, may continue to do so until [please insert date 18 months after the date of application of this Regulation].
Amendment 28 #
2020/0155(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 lays down requirements for the drawing up, approval and distribution of the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market in the Union. As part of the measures to help issuers to recover from the economic shock resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, targeted amendments to the prospectus regime are necessary. Such amendments should enable issuers and financial intermediaries to reduce costs and free up resources for the recovery phase in the immediate aftermath of the crisis, while ensuring a high level of investor protection. _________________ 14Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market, and repealing Directive 2003/71/EC (OJ L 168, 30.6.2017, p. 12).
Amendment 68 #
2020/0155(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2017/1129
Article 14a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 14a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) offerors of shares admitted to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market continuously for at least the last 18 months.
Amendment 122 #
2020/0155(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
Regulation (EU) 2017/1129
Annex Va – section III
Annex Va – section III
Amendment 95 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Steering Board should set specific geographical concentration limits for the solvency support window, in line with the indicators and methodology established by the Commission, in order to ensure, respectively, that the majority of the EU guarantee under the Solvency Support Instrument supports eligible companies in Member States and sectors which have been economically most adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and that the majority of that guarantee supports eligible companies in Member States where the possibility of State solvency support is most limited. The indicators and methodology established by the Commission should be consistent with the allocation key applicable to the Recovery and Resilience Facility1a.The limits shall be reviewed on a regular basis and updated to reflect any evolving COVID-19 economic impacts and/or subsequent waves of the virus. _________________ 1aCouncil Regulation []establishing a European Union Recovery Instrument to support the recovery in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic
Amendment 105 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 b (new)
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) The Investment Committee under the Invest EU Regulation should become responsible for granting the EU guarantee also under this Regulation once it is established. (Moved from Recital 14.)
Amendment 106 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 c (new)
Recital 4 c (new)
(4c) When selecting eligible companies, the Investment Committee should give due consideration to whether the company or parent company of the EU subsidiary has received foreign subsidies since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Amendment 107 #
2020/0106(COD)
(4d) The Steering Board should set any necessary requirements relating to the control of the beneficiary company in light of any applicable public order or security concerns.
Amendment 126 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The financing and investment operations should be aligned with current policy priorities of the Union such as the European Green Deal and the Strategy on shaping Europe’s digital future. SDue to the interconnectedness of the Union economy, support to cross-border activities should also be targeted to prevent potential spill-over effects and to maximise the benefits of cross-border supply chains.
Amendment 144 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 146 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Support granted under the solvency support window should include provisions to ensure that efforts to curb tax avoidance, money laundering, fraud and abuse are pursued and that proper functioning of the internal market is maintained. As such, entities benefitting from support, or financial intermediaries or approved eligible vehicles carrying out projects under the solvency support window shall not be established, incorporated, or be controlled by shareholders in jurisdictions listed under the relevant Union policy on non- cooperative jurisdictions, or jurisdictions identified as high-risk third countries that have strategic deficiencies in their national anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing regimes, pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/849. The EIB should regulatory report to the European Parliament and Council on the continuous measures being taken to detect and prevent fraud.
Amendment 152 #
2020/0106(COD)
(16a) In order to supplement the non- essential elements of this Regulation in relation to determining the Member States and sectors economically most hit and the Member States where the possibility of State solvency support is more limited, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of establishing indicators and a methodology for the application thereof. The indicators and methodology established by the Commission should be consistent with the allocation key applicable to the Recovery and Resilience Facility. It is of particular importance that the Commission carryout appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 157 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the solvency of companies established in a Member State and operating in the Union that have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Amendment 161 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – indent 3
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – indent 3
– support to funds, special purpose vehicles, investment platforms or other arrangements under the solvency support window. , especially those facilitating investment in Member States and sectors most adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Amendment 163 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
(4a) In Article 5, the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 is amended as follows: "In line with the investment guidelines laid down in Annex II, the Steering Board shall adjust the project mix as regards sectors and countries, on the basis of an ongoing monitoring of the developments of market conditions in the Member States and of the investment environment to help overcome market failures and sub-optimal investment situations including problems resulting from financial fragmentation and, for the purposes of the solvency support window, to take into account the impact of a prolongation or resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic. When carrying out that adjustment, the Steering Board shall avoid an approach which would be riskier than necessary. " Or. en (32015R1017)
Amendment 174 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 7
Article 7 – paragraph 7
(7a) Paragraph 7 of Article 7 is amended as follows: "The EFSI Agreement shall provide that the EFSI is to have an investment committee, which is to be responsible for examining potential projects in line with the EFSI investment policies and for approving the support of the EU guarantee for EIB operations for projects that comply with the requirements of Articles 6 and 9, irrespective of the geographic location, in accordance with Article 8, of such projects, with the exception of projects under the solvency support window for which geographical location is a relevant factor for consideration. Furthermore, the Investment Committee shall be the competent body for approving operations with investment platforms and national promotional banks or institutions. " Or. en (32015R1017)
Amendment 177 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point l a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point l a (new)
(7a) In the third subparagraph of Article 7(8), the following point is added: "(la) tourism and hospitality;"
Amendment 179 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Notwithstanding the first paragraph, only companies established in a Member State and operating in the Union can be supported by the financing and investment operations under the solvency support window. The Steering Committee shall determine any necessary requirements relating to the ultimate control of the company being supported in light of any applicable public order or security concerns.
Amendment 189 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point g – subpoint iv
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point g – subpoint iv
(vi) tourism; 10a) In the third subparagraph of Article 9(2), point (g)(vi) is amended as follows: "(vi) tourism and hospitality;" Or. en (32015R1017)
Amendment 213 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
(-a) in paragraph 1, the first subparagraph is amended as follows: "The European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) shall have as its objective to build upon existing EIB and Commission advisory services in order to provide advisory support for the identification, preparation and development of investment projects and to act as a single technical advisory hub for project financing within the Union. Such support shall include the provision of targeted support on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, on the use of innovative financial instruments, on the use of public-private partnerships and on the provision of information, as appropriate, on relevant issues relating to Union law, and for the purposes of the solvency support window, on the setting up, structuring and management of special purpose vehicles, funds, investment platforms and other vehicles, taking into account the specificities and needs of Member States with less developed financial markets, as well as the situation in different sectors. " Or. en (32017R2396)
Amendment 215 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a
(ba) paragraph 6a is amended as follows: "In order to develop a wide geographic outreach of the advisory services across the Union and to successfully leverage local knowledge about the EFSI, a local presence of the EIAH shall be ensured where necessary, taking into account existing support schemes, with a view to providing tangible, proactive, tailor-made assistance on the ground. It shall be established in particular in Member States or regions that face difficulties in developing projects under the EFSI and, for the purposes of the solvency support window, in Member States most adversely economically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The EIAH shall assist in the transfer of knowledge to the regional and local level with a view to building up regional and local capacity and expertise. " Or. en (32017R2396)
Amendment 221 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)
Operations under the solvency support window shall be reported on separately, as appropriate and as set out in the guarantee agreement. and shall additionally include:
Amendment 222 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 b (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a (new)
(27b) In the second subparagraph of Article 16(2), the following point is added: ‘(a) a description of the measures taken to detect and prevent fraudulent practices and money-laundering in the investment chain of the EIB investment operations in accordance with Article 21;’
Amendment 224 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 d (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c (new)
(27d) In the second subparagraph of Article 16(2), the following point is added: ‘(c) an assessment of the contribution to the digital transformation of the Union economy.’
Amendment 238 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex II – Section 6 – point d – indent 3
Annex II – Section 6 – point d – indent 3
– The funds, special purpose vehicles or investment platforms shall provide financing on commercial terms or on terms consistent with the State aid Temporary Framework12 , while paying due regard to the European nature of the Solvency Support Instrument and to the funds’ and other vehicles’ independent management. Member States involved in the funds, special purpose vehicles or investment platforms shall do so in accordance with the requirements in Annex III of this Regulation. _________________ 12Communication from the Commission: Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (C(2020)1863), as amended by C(2020) 3156 final.
Amendment 244 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex II – Section 6 – point d – indent 5
Annex II – Section 6 – point d – indent 5
– Companies targeted by funds, special purpose vehicles or investment platforms shall be encouraged to comply, to the extent possible, with minimum high- level social and environmental safeguards in line with guidance provided by the Steering Board. Such guidance should include adequate provisions for avoiding undue administrative burdens, taking into account the size of companies and including lighproportionater provisions for SMEs. Companies with a certain level of exposure to a pre-defined list of environmentally harmful activities, in particular the sectors covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), shall be encouraged to put in place, in the future, green transition plans. Companies shall also be encouraged to advance in their digital transformation. Technical assistance shall be available to assist companies for the purpose of these transitions.
Amendment 253 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex II – Section 8 – point b – subparagraph 2
Annex II – Section 8 – point b – subparagraph 2
The Steering Board shall set specific diversification and concentration limits under the Solvency Support Window to ensure that the respective requirements of Article 9(2a)(b) and (c) are fulfilled, whilst avoiding excessive concentration in a limited number of Member States. The Steering Board shall regularly, and at least on a quarterly basis, take stock of the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on Member States and sectors. On this basis, the Steering Board may decide to modify these limits, after consulting the Investment Committee.
Amendment 255 #
2020/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex III (new)
Annex III (new)
Amendment 27 #
2020/0006(COD)
(2) The transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy constitutes one of the most important policy objectives for the Union. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. While fighting climate change and environmental degradation will benefit all in the long term and provides opportunities and challenges for all in the medium term, not all regions and Member States start their transition from the same point or have the same capacity to respond. Some are more advanced than others, whereas the transition entails a wider social and economic impact for those regions that rely heavily on fossil fuels -, especially coal, lignite, peat and oil shale - or, greenhouse gas intensive industries or industries whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Such a situation not only creates the risk of a variable speed transition in the Union as regards climate action, but also of growing disparities between regions, detrimental to the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 32 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In order to be successful, the transition has to be fair and socially acceptable for all. Therefore, both the Union and the Member States must take into account its economic and social implications from the outset, and deploy all possible instruments to mitigate adverse consequences. The aim of the controlled transition is avoiding economic collapse of the most exposed regions while not undermining the basis of economic development in these regions. The Union budget has an important role in that regard.
Amendment 36 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation establishes the Just Transition Fund (‘JTF’) which is one of the pillars of the Just Transition Mechanism implemented under cohesion policy. The aim of the JTF is to mitigate the adverse effects of the climate transition by supporting the most affected territories and workers concerned. In line with the JTF specific objective, actions supported by the JTF should directly contribute to alleviate the impact of the transition by financing the diversification and modernisatmodernisation and reconversion of the local economy and by mitigating the negative repercussions on employment through trainings, re-skilling and updated education curricula. This is reflected in the JTF specific objective, which is established at the same level and listed together with the policy objectives set out in Article [4] of Regulation EU [new CPR]. Given the nature of the transition policy, the JTF is proposed as a long-term instrument fully in line with the vision of climate neutral continent by 2050.
Amendment 38 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In view of the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the commitment regarding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the increased ambition of the Union as proposed in the European Green Deal, the JTF should provide a key contribution to mainstream climate actions. Resources from the JTF own envelope are additional and come on top of the investments needed to achieve the overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditure contributing to climate objectives. Resources transferred from the ERDF and ESF+ will contribute fully to the achievement of this target.
Amendment 43 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The resources from the JTF should complement the resources available under cohesion policy instruments and all other relevant EU and national funding instruments targeting vulnerable sectors.
Amendment 48 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Transitioning to a climate-neutral economy is a challenge for all Member States. It will be particularly demanding for those Member States that rely heavily on fossil fuels or, have greenhouse gas intensive industrial activities or have industrial activities whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality, which need to be phased out or which need to adapt due to the transition towards climate neutrality and that lack the financial means to do so. The JTF should therefore cover all Member States, but the distribution of its financial means should reflect the capacity of Member States to finance the necessary investments to cope with the transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 56 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation identifies types of investments for which expenditure may be supported by the JTF. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental, cohesion, industrial, mobility and energy policy priorities of the Union. The list of investments should include those that support local economies and are sustainable in the long- term, taking into account all the objectives of the Green Deal. The projects financed should above all mitigate negative economic and societal impacts of environmental transition and contribute to a transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy. For declining sectors, such as energy production based on coal, lignite, peat and oil shale or extraction activities for these solid fossil fuels, support should be linked to the phasing out of the activity and the corresponding reduction in the employment level. As regards transforming sectors with high greenhouse gas emission levels, support should promote new activities through the deployment of new technologies, new processes or products, leading to significant emission reduction, in line with the EU 2030 climate objectives and EU climate neutrality by 205013 while maintaining and enhancing employment and avoiding environmental degradation. Particular attention should also be given to activities enhancing innovation and research in advanced and sustainable technologies, as well as in the fields of digitalisation and, connectivity and smart mobility, provided that such measures help mitigate the negative side effects of a transition towards, and contribute to, a climate- neutral and circular economy. _________________ 13 As set out in “A Clean Planet for all European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy”, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank - COM(2018) 773 final.
Amendment 60 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The JTF should also support industrial activities which, although they do not generate significant greenhouse gas emissions, involve manufacturing of industrial products which are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. In that connection, the European thermicvehicle-manufacturing sector is one of the most severely disrupted, and will be disrupted even more, at a time when it is operating in a context of ever stiffer international competition and more stringent environmental requirements– it accounts for almost 20% of the Union’s CO2 emissions. Carbon neutrality cannot therefore be achieved without specific support for this sector, which accounts for 8.5% of industrial jobs in the EU, 7.5% of EU GDP and some 3.5million direct jobs, which means 11,4% of jobs in EU manufacturing, and 13,8million indirect jobs. In particular, as vehicle manufacturers, their suppliers and the maintenance and repair sectors are the most exposed, the JTF should support these sectors and assist workers and jobseekers in their conversion to more modern skills, particularly in the context of alternative industries manufacturing zero- and/or low-emission vehicles.
Amendment 69 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy constitutes one of the most important policy objectives for the Union. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. While fighting climate change and environmental degradation will benefit all in the long term and provides opportunities and challenges for all in the medium term, not all regions and Member States start their transition from the same point or have the same capacity to respond. Some are more advanced than others, whereas the transition entails a wider social and economic impact for those regions that rely heavily on fossil fuels -, especially coal, lignite, peat and oil shale - or, greenhouse gas intensive industries or industries whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Such a situation not only creates the risk of a variable speed transition in the Union as regards climate action, but also of growing disparities between regions, detrimental to the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 70 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impacted by the transition, the JTF should provide support to productive investment in SMEs. Productive investment should be understood as investment in fixed capital or immaterial assets of enterprises in view of producing goods and services thereby contributing to gross-capital formation and employment. For enterprises other than SMEs, productive investments should only be supported if they are necessary for mitigating job losses resulting from the transition, by creating or protecting a significant number of jobs and they do not lead to or result from relocation. Investments in existing industrial facilities, including those covered by the Union Emissions Trading System, should be allowed if they contribute to the transition to a climate-neutral economy by 2050 and go substantially below the relevant benchmarks established for free allocation under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 and if they result in the protection of a significant number of jobs. Any such investment should be justified accordingly in the relevant territorial just transition plan. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market and cohesion policy, support to undertakings should comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU and, in particular, support to productive investments by enterprises other than SMEs should be limited to enterprises located in areas designated as assisted areas for the purposes of points (a) and (c) of Article 107(3) TFEU. _________________ 14Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 76 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In order to be successful, the transition has to be fair and socially acceptable for all. Therefore, both the Union and the Member States must take into account its economic and social implications from the outset, and deploy all possible instruments to mitigate adverse consequences. The aim of the controlled and just transition is avoiding economic downturns in the most exposed regions while not undermining the prospects for economic development in these regions. The Union budget has an important role in that regard.
Amendment 81 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The territorial just transition plans should identify the territories most negatively affected, where JTF support should be concentrated and describe specific actions to be undertaken to reach a climate-neutral economy by 2050, notably as regards the modernisation, conversion or closure of facilities involving fossil fuel production or other greenhouse gas intensive activities or activities whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Those territories should be precisely defined and correspond to NUTS level 3 regions or should be parts thereof. The plans should detail the challenges and needs of those territories and identify the type of operations needed in a manner that ensures the coherent development of climate-resilient economic activities that are also consistent with the transition to climate-neutrality and the objectives of the Green Deal. Only investments in accordance with the transition plans should receive financial support from the JTF. The territorial just transition plans should be part of the programmes (supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund or the JTF, as the case may be) which are approved by the Commission.
Amendment 91 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Just Transition Fund (‘JTF’) to provide support to territories or economic activities facing serious socio-economic challenges deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy of the Union by 2050.
Amendment 96 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article [4(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the JTF shall contribute to the single specific objective ‘enabling regions, economic operators and people to address the social, economic and environmental impacts of the transition towards a climate- neutral economy’.
Amendment 101 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In view of the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the commitment regarding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the increased ambition of the Union as proposed in the European Green Deal, the JTF should provide a key contribution to mainstream climate actions. Resources from the JTF own envelope are additional and come on top of the investments needed to achieve the overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditure contributing to climate objectives. Resources transferredVoluntary transfers of resources decided by each Member State from the ERDF and ESF+ will contribute fully tomplement the achievement of this target.
Amendment 113 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The resources from the JTF should complement the resources available under cohesion policy instruments and all other relevant EU and national funding instruments targeting vulnerable sectors, and should not lead to cuts or compulsory transfers from EU funds covered by Regulation.../…[new CPR].
Amendment 125 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) investments in the deployment of technology and infrastructures for affordable clean and smart mobility contributing to greenhouse gas emission reduction and to diversification of mobility solutions;
Amendment 126 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation identifies types of investments for which expenditure may be supported by the JTF. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental priorities of the Union. The list of investments should include those that support local economies and are sustainable in the long- term, taking into account all the objectives of the Green Deal. The projects financed should contribute to a transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy, above all, mitigate negative economic and societal impacts of environmental transition and contribute to a transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy. Investments in transitional energy sources such as natural gas shall be eligible for support if such investments lead to a substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and allow for the use of renewable gas as a sustainable alternative. For declining sectors, such as energy production based on coal, lignite, peat and oil shale or extraction activities for these solid fossil fuels, support should be linked to the phasing out of the activity and the corresponding reduction in the employment level. As regards transforming sectors with high greenhouse gas emission levels, support should promote new activities through the deployment of new technologies, new processes or products, leading to significant emission reduction, in line with the EU 2030 climate objectives and EU climate neutrality by 205013 while maintaining and enhancing employment and avoiding environmental degradation. Particular attention should also be given to activities enhancing innovation and research in advanced and sustainable technologies, as well as in the fields of digitalisation and connectivity, provided that such measures help mitigate the negative side effects of a transition towards, and contribute to, a climate- neutral and circular economy. It is also necessary to provide support for industrial factories and industrial parks in their efforts to adapt their spaces to new sustainable activities. __________________ 13 As set out in “A Clean Planet for all European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy”, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank - COM(2018) 773 final.
Amendment 146 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impacted by the transition, the JTF should provide support to productive investment in SMEs in order to help them re-orient their business activities and create new opportunities. Productive investment should be understood as investment in fixed capital or immaterial assets of enterprises in view of producing goods and services thereby contributing to gross- capital formation, scaling up and employment. For enterprises other than SMEs, productive investments should only be supported if they are necessary for mitigating job losses resulting from the transition, by creating or protecting a significant number of jobs and they do not lead to or result from relocation. Investments in existing industrial facilities, including those covered by the Union Emissions Trading System, should be allowed if they contribute to the transition to a climate-neutral economy by 2050 and go substantially below the relevant benchmarks established for free allocation under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 and if they result in the protection of a significant number of jobs. Any such investment should be justified accordingly in the relevant territorial just transition plan. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market and cohesion policy, support to undertakings should comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU and, in particular, support to productive investments by enterprises other than SMEs should be limited to enterprises located in areas designated as assisted areas for the purposes of points (a) and (c) of Article 107(3) TFEU. __________________ 14Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 158 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to provide flexibility for the programming of the JTF resources under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, it should be possible to prepare a self- standing JTF programme or to programme JTF resources in one or more dedicated priorities within a programme supported by the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’) or the Cohesion Fund. In accordance with Article 21a of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], JTF resources shcould be reinforced with complementarythe voluntary transfer of funding from the ERDF and the ESF+. The respective amounts transferred from the ERDF and the ESF+ should be consistent with the type of operations set out in the territorial just transition plans.
Amendment 165 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The JTF support should be conditional on the effective implementation of a transition process in a specific territory in order to achieve a climate-neutral economy. In that regard, Member States should prepare, in cooperation with the relevant stakeholders as defined by the partnership principle in Article 6 of EU Regulation.../…[new CPR] and supported by the Commission, territorial just transition plans, detailing the transition process, consistently with their National Energy and Climate Plans. To this end, the Commission should set up a Just Transition Platform, which would build on the existing platform for coal regions in transition to enable bilateral and multilateral exchanges of experience on lessons learnt and best practices across all affected sectors.
Amendment 171 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The territorial just transition plans should identify the territories most negatively affected, where JTF support should be concentrated and describe specific actions to be undertaken to reach a climate-neutral economy by 2050, notably as regards the modernisation, conversion or closure of facilities involving fossil fuel production or other greenhouse gas intensive activities or activities where the products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Those territories should be precisely defined and correspond to NUTS level 3 regions or should be parts thereof. The plans should detail the challenges and needs of those territories and identify the type of operations needed in a manner that ensures the coherent development of climate-resilient economic activities that are also consistent with the transition to climate-neutrality and the objectives of the Green Deal. Only investments in accordance with the transition plans should receive financial support from the JTF. The territorial just transition plans should be part of the programmes (supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund or the JTF, as the case may be) which are approved by the Commission.
Amendment 176 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The JTF resources shall be programmed for the categories of regions where the territories or economic activities concerned are located, on the basis of the territorial just transition plans established in accordance with Article 7 and approved by the Commission as part of a programme or a programme amendment. The resources programmed shall take the form of one or more specific programmes or of one or more priorities within a programme.
Amendment 178 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall only approve a programme where the identification of the territories or economic activities most negatively affected by the transition process, contained within the relevant territorial just transition plan, is duly justified and the relevant territorial just transition plan is consistent with the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 182 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare, together with the relevant authorities of the territories concerned, one or more territorial just transition plans covering one or more affected territories corresponding to level 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics (‘NUTS level 3 regions’) as established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 868/201417 or parts thereof, in accordance with the template set out in Annex II. Those territories shall be those most negatively affected based on the economic and social impacts resulting from the transition, in particular with regard to expected job losses in fossil fuel production and use and the transformation needs of the production processes of industrial facilities with the highest greenhouse gas intensity and conversion to alternative industries in sectors whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. _________________ 17 Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154 21.6.2003, p. 1).
Amendment 189 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Just Transition Fund (‘JTF’) to provide support to territories or economic activities facing serious socio-economic challenges deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy of the Union by 2050.
Amendment 192 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a justification for identifying the territories or economic activities as most negatively affected by the transition process referred to in point (a) and to be supported by the JTF, in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 195 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an assessment of the transition challenges faced by the most negatively affected territories or economic activities, including the social, economic, and environmental impact of the transition to a climate-neutral economy, identifying the potential number of affected jobs and job losses, the development needs and objectives, to be reached by 2030 linked to the transformation or closure of greenhouse gas-intensive activities or activities whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality in those territories;
Amendment 198 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article [4(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the JTF shall contribute to the single specific objective ‘enabling regions, economic operators and people to address the social, economic and environmental impacts of the transition towards a climate- neutral economy’.
Amendment 211 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Territorial just transition plans shall be consistent with the territorial strategies referred to in Article [23] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], with relevant smart specialisation strategies, industrial strategy, clean and smart mobility strategy, the NECPs and the European Pillar of Social Rights.
Amendment 212 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The resources for the JTF under the Investment for jobs and growth goal available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 7.540 billion in 2018 prices, whichand shall not result from the transfer of resources from other EU funds covered by EU Regulation.../…[new CPR]. It may be increased, as the case may be, by additional resources allocated in the Union budget, and by other resources in accordance with the applicable basic act.
Amendment 242 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) productive investments in SMEs, including micro-enterprises and start-ups, leading to economic diversification and, reconversion and scale up;
Amendment 270 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) investment in district heating;
Amendment 272 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) ensuring the security of energy supply;
Amendment 273 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new)
(dc) investments related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of gas, provided that it is used as a bridging technology replacing coal, lignite, peat, oil shale and demonstrates it delivers significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; these investments should allow for the use of renewable gas at a later stage;
Amendment 277 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) investments in the deployment of technology and infrastructure for affordable clean and smart mobility contributing to greenhouse gas emission reduction and to the diversification of mobility solutions;
Amendment 281 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) investments in regeneration and decontamination of sites and brown fields, land restoration and repurposing projects including investments in the preparation of their support and background documentation and analysis;
Amendment 327 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 343 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) investment related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels with the exception of investments as defined by Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph1, point dc (new);
Amendment 359 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The JTF resources shall be programmed for the categories of regions where the territories or economic activities concerned are located, on the basis of the territorial just transition plans established in accordance with Article 7 and approved by the Commission as part of a programme or a programme amendment. The resources programmed shall take the form of one or more specific programmes or of one or more priorities within a programme.
Amendment 363 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall only approve a programme where the identification of the territories or economic activities most negatively affected by the transition process, contained within the relevant territorial just transition plan, is duly justified and the relevant territorial just transition plan is consistent with the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 372 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The JTF priority or priorities shall comprise the JTF resources consisting of all or part of the JTF allocation for the Member States and the resources voluntarily transferred in accordance with Article [21a] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR]. The total of the ERDF and ESF+ resources transferred to the JTF priority shall be at least equal to one and a halfup to three times the amount of support from the JTF to that priority but shall not exceed three times that amount.
Amendment 388 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a justification for identifying the territories or economic activities as most negatively affected by the transition process referred to in point (a) and to be supported by the JTF, in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 390 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an assessment of the transition challenges faced by the most negatively affected territories or economic activities, including the social, economic, and environmental impact of the transition to a climate-neutral economy, identifying the potential number of affected jobs and job losses, the development needs and objectives, to be reached by 2030 linked to the transformation or closure of greenhouse gas-intensive activities or activities where their products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality in those territories;
Amendment 31 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the improvement in the economic situation and low interest rates provide an opportunity to implement ambitious reforms, in particular measures aimed at encouraging public investment to tackle climate change and its social consequences and create full-time jobstructural reforms;
Amendment 46 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 60 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 83 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that, in view of the climate change emergency, the EU’s Annual Growth Survey (AGS) has now been renamed the Annual Sustainable Growth Survey (ASGS), and considers that this implies a change in the positioning of the report and the implementation of ecological indicators;
Amendment 93 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 111 #
Amendment 117 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers achieving a fair transition to climate neutrality to be a major responsibility for the EU’s citizens and economy and its role in the world; calls for appropriate support and policies, with involvement for and of the public, the various sectors, regions and Member States with a view to benefiting from this transformation and making it a success; calls on the Commission to undertake an annual evaluation of the Union’s ecological debt, carbon budget and imported emissions;
Amendment 145 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned that post-crisis investment has been on a downward path in the EU in spite of historically low interest rates, currently standing at 3.4 %, with overall infrastructure investment now at about 75 % of its pre-crisis level; whereas 80 % of the shortfall is the result of cutbacks in the public sector, which have occurred particularly in countries subject to adverse macroeconomic conditions and the more severe fiscal constraints imposed on disadvantaged regions already characterised by poor infrastructure quality and weak socio- economic outcomes, but also, and surprisingly, in countries with a large fiscal space;
Amendment 154 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises that Member States must increase productivity through productive investments that can stimulate much-needed potential economic growth;
Amendment 155 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Stresses that intra-European foreign direct investment can lead to productivity gains for both the investing firm and local firms in the host regions, and helps generate economic convergence within Europe; considers that clear and enforceable rules, a level playing field and reduced compliance costs are crucial factors for attracting investment, a key component of the EU Single Market that delivers economic growth, creates jobs and secures prosperity for our citizens;
Amendment 156 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Highlights the urgent Need for a fully-fledged capital markets union, as better integrated financial markets could provide for further private risk-sharing and risk-reduction mechanisms, facilitate cross-border investments and access to finance for SMEs and the real economy, and promote sustainable investments
Amendment 157 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Considers that reforms removing disproportionate red tape to investments would both facilitate economic activity and create conditions conducive to long- term growth;
Amendment 158 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Stresses that increasing productivity growth requires investment in skills, innovation, Automation, digitalisation, R&D, sustainable mobility and infrastructure, and emphasises the need to invest in both physical and human capital, and thereby calls on the Member States to ensure equal access to lifelong education, upskilling and retraining to best prepare our citizens to face the challenges of the Digital age;
Amendment 159 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 175 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 192 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 207 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Amendment 213 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. SharesTakes note of the concern expressed in others of the EFB European Fiscal Boards’s conclusions regarding the pro- cyclical elements in the EU fiscal rules, which forced Member S; tatkes to adjust their economies in a poor or difficult economic situation, failing to improve the quality of public finance and promote investment; welcomes the EFBnote of the European Fiscal Board’s recommendation of a seven-year cycle mirroring the MFFulti-Annual Financial Framework so as to better coordinate Member States’ public accounts, and especially investmentregarding investment, thus helping them attain much-needed converge;
Amendment 218 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the debt levels of all the Member States are above the pre-crisis level and are expected to exceed 60 % in 2021; further notes that in six Member States the ratio will be higher than 90 %; highlights the fact that the fiscal rules have not contributed to bringing down the debt levels of highly indebted countries but have, rather, increased them;
Amendment 229 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Supports flexibility in the implementation of the SGP as proposed by the Commission in 2015; considers that much more flexibility should be introduced in order to boost investment and ecological transition in the EU; calls, therefore, for the reform of the SGP and the introduction of a euro area fiscal capacityArgues that the SGP process has to be accompanied by rules that avoid pro- cyclicality and incentivize countercyclical policy measures;
Amendment 242 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 253 #
Amendment 273 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Is concerned that the low interest rates during a long growth period will lead to misperception about the high burden of indebtedness for future generations.
Amendment 278 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls the importance of the efficient regulation of the banking and financial sectors in order to prevent a new crisis; believes that such regulation must integrate the ecological situation; emphasises the importance of completing the Banking Union and the need to reform the European Stability Mechanism;
Amendment 293 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Points out that macro-financial stability and sound public finances remain a precondition of sustainable growth;
Amendment 295 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Calls for those Member Stateswith high levels of deficits and public debt to undertake continuous efforts to reduce them; acknowledges the efforts made by a number of Member States to consolidate their public finances, but regrets the fact that some have missed the opportunity to carry out the necessary reforms;
Amendment 299 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Welcomes that some Member States with good fiscal space have consolidated even further;
Amendment 300 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15 d. Urges the Member States to build appropriate fiscal Buffers;
Amendment 301 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 e (new)
Paragraph 15 e (new)
Amendment 302 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 f (new)
Paragraph 15 f (new)
15 f. Welcomes the Commission’sefforts to encourage those Member States with current account deficits or high external debt to improve their competitiveness;
Amendment 303 #
Amendment 305 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 316 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the systematic inclusion of tax matters in the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs), with the aim of ensuring economic coherence across EU Member States as well as the fairness of EU tax systems; believes that the CSRs could ensure a fair balance between sources of revenue and should also include innovative elements aiming at promoting the Green Deal; further believes that they should also support Member States in tackling tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning;
Amendment 339 #
Amendment 349 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 357 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 365 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 371 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 378 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 384 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 397 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Recalls that the degree of implementation of the country-specific recommendations is too low; believes that the focus of the European Semester should be on national ownership; urges national and regional parliaments to debate country reports andcountry- specific recommendations and to engage with the relevant actors; Points out that a more streamlined and more focused European Semester could increase ownership;
Amendment 399 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 407 #
2019/2211(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 129 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas hate speech and hate crimes motivated by intolerance from far- right and far-left extremisms are growing;
Amendment 135 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas an independent judiciary, freedom of expression and information and media pluralism are crucial components of the rule of law;
Amendment 163 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Roma women are particularly affected as regards women’s rights and often face exacerbated forms of verbal, physical, psychological and racial harassment in reproductive health care settings, as has found to be the case in Bulgaria19 ; whereas Roma have also experienced in that Member State, ethnic segregation in maternal health care facilities, and are placed in segregated rooms with segregated bathrooms and eating facilities20 ; whereas in some Member States, such as the Slovak Republic and the Czech Republic, Roma have been subjected to systematic practices of forced and coercive sterilisation and have been unable to obtain adequate reparations, including compensation, for the resulting violations of their human rights21 ; __________________ 19Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Europe, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2017, pp. 42-44; Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights of 5 December 2018, European Roma Rights Centre v Bulgaria, Complaint No. 151/2017 ; European Roma Rights Centre, Romani woman harassed by racist hospital staff during childbirth wins case, European Roma Rights Centre, 18 January 2017, http://www.errc.org/press-releases/romani- woman-harassed-by-racist-hospital-staff- during-childbirth-wins-case 20Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights of 5 December 2018, European Roma Rights Centre v Bulgaria, Complaint No. 151/2017. 21 Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Concluding observations on the third periodic report of Slovakia, 18 October 2019, E/C.12/SVK/CO/3, paras. 44-45; Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Concluding observations on the combined twelfth and thirteenth periodic reports of Czechia, 19 September 2019, CERD/C/CZE/CO/12-13, paras. 19-20; Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Concluding observations on the combined eleventh and twelfth periodic reports of Slovakia, 12 January 2018, CERD/C/SVK/CO/11-12, paras. 23- 24; Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations on the fourth report of Slovakia, 22 November 2016, CCPR/C/SVK/CO/4, paras. 26-27.
Amendment 166 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Roma women are particularly affected as regards women’s rights and often face exacerbated forms of verbal, physical, psychological and racial harassment in reproductive health care settings, as has found to be the case in Bulgaria19 ; whereas Roma have also experienced in that Member State, ethnic segregation in maternal health care facilities, and are placed in segregated rooms with segregated bathrooms and eating facilities20 ; whereas in some Member States, such as the Slovak Republic and the Czech Republic, Roma have been subjected to systematic practices of forced and coercive sterilisation and have been unable to obtain adequate reparations, including compensation, for the resulting violations of their human rights21 ; __________________ 19Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Europe, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2017, pp. 42-44; Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights of 5 December 2018, European Roma Rights Centre v Bulgaria, Complaint No. 151/2017 ; European Roma Rights Centre, Romani woman harassed by racist hospital staff during childbirth wins case, European Roma Rights Centre, 18 January 2017, http://www.errc.org/press- releases/romani-woman-harassed-by- racist-hospital-staff-during-childbirth- wins-case 20Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights of 5 December 2018, European Roma Rights Centre v Bulgaria, Complaint No. 151/2017. 21Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Concluding observations on the third periodic report of Slovakia, 18 October 2019, E/C.12/SVK/CO/3, paras. 44-45; Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Concluding observations on the combined twelfth and thirteenth periodic reports of Czechia, 19 September 2019, CERD/C/CZE/CO/12-13, paras. 19-20; Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Concluding observations on the combined eleventh and twelfth periodic reports of Slovakia, 12 January 2018, CERD/C/SVK/CO/11-12, paras. 23- 24; Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations on the fourth report of Slovakia, 22 November 2016, CCPR/C/SVK/CO/4, paras. 26-27.;
Amendment 185 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 193 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas many instances of disproportionate use of force against peaceful demonstrators continue to be reported across the EU, including the beating of demonstrators; whereas law enforcement authorities in some Member States such as Romania23 , Spain and France24 are increasingly using less lethal weapons, such as batons, tear gas, hand- held sting grenades, electroshock weapons, water cannons and rubber bullets to control or disperse crowds of demonstrators; whereas the number of persons seriously wounded in demonstrations in recent years as a result of the use of rubber bullets is particularly striking; __________________ 23European Parliament resolution of 13 November 2018 on the rule of law in Romania (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0446) 24Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Shrinking space for freedom of peaceful assembly, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2019; Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Memorandum on maintaining public order and freedom of assembly in the context of the ‘yellow vest’ movement in France, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2019; Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Protection of the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly during last week’s demonstrations in Catalonia, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2019;
Amendment 203 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 218 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. wWhereas pushbacks constitute a violthe EU has an obligation ofunder EU and international law and prevent migrants from benefiting from the legal guarantees firmly laid down in such law; whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights expressed grave concern about consistent reports of violent pushbacks by Croatian law enforcement officials25 to help those who come to the EU seeking asylum; whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights also expressed concerns regarding the practice of ‘summary returns’ in the enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla in relation to the ECtHR cases N.D. v Spain and N.T. v Spain26 ; __________________ 25 Letter from the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe to the Prime Minister of Croatia of 20 September 2018; Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Bosnia and Herzegovina must immediately close the Vučjak camp and take concrete measures to improve the treatment of migrants in the country, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2019 26Third party intervention by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights of 22 March 2018, N.D. v Spain and N.T. v Spain, CommDH(2018)11.grave concern about consistent reports of violent pushbacks;
Amendment 269 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the effects of austerity measureconomic policies have deeply impacted in the social fabric of the EU in many Member States and that this continues today – exacerbating alreadyand that European institutions and the Member States have the tools to avoid widening inequalities and breaching fundamental rights – and affects women, migrants, Roma, Travellers and other disadvantaged groups with a particular ferocity;
Amendment 282 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that housing is not a commodity, but a necessity, without which citizens cannot fully participate in society and access fundamental rights; calls on the Commission and the Member States to integrate the recommendations made by the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner in her comment of 23 January 2020 entitled ‘The right to affordable housing: Europe’s neglected duty’, particularly the recommendatiand place among that all Member States should promptly accept to be bound by Article 31 of the revised European Social Charter on the right to housing, and step up investment in social and affordable housing to eradicate the burden of high housing costeir priorities of social policies the right to adequate housing for citizens, particularly amongto protect disadvantaged and vulnerable groups;
Amendment 376 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Regrets the rise of number of cases of LGBTI people experiencing bullying and harassment and suffering from discrimination in different aspects of their lives;
Amendment 382 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Recalls that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) is a legally binding international treaty, signed and ratified by the EU, the aim being to ensure equal opportunities regarding accessibility, participation, equality, employment, education and training, social protection, health, and EU external action; calls the Member States to implement the appropriate policies to ensure that people with disabilities can fully enjoy their social, political and economic rights;
Amendment 606 #
2019/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 d (new)
Paragraph 14 d (new)
14d. Strongly condemns the upsurge in the trafficking of human beings and urges the Member States to increase cooperation and step up their fight against organised crime, including smuggling and trafficking in human beings, but also exploitation, forced labour, sexual abuse, and torture, all while protecting victims;
Amendment 1 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the regulation on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediations services (2019/1150) of June 2019;
Amendment 6 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the « Strengthening strategic value chains for a future-ready EU industry » report of the Strategic Forum for Important Projects of Common European Interest;
Amendment 45 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to monitor foreign direct investment and not to limit itself to the screening mechanismensure a rapid implementation of the screening for foreign direct investments mechanism and to propose a tool to strengthen the current mechanism, whilst ensuring that the European Union remains an attractive destination for investment;
Amendment 62 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to identify subsidies distributed by our main trading partners in cooperation with Member States and stakeholders, building on the recent proposal of the Dutch government;
Amendment 94 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Amendment 101 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for a review of the 1997 communication on the definition of the relevant market (97/C 372/03) so as to move towards a longer-term vision encompassing the global dimension and potential future competition; takes note of the Commission's announced intention in this respect;
Amendment 161 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that some entities, benefiting from dual status as both platforms and suppliers, being at the same time "player and referee", abuse their position to impose unfair terms on competitors; calls on the Commission to penalise themenforce the necessary laws and make use of the necessary instruments to prevent these abuses;
Amendment 176 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Draws the Commission’s attention to recent acquisitions by foreign monopolies of digital operators of health data and the privacy risks involved, over and above the damaging effects of these transactions on competition; calls on the Commission to take those aspects into account regarding the upcoming European strategy on data;
Amendment 209 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. PStresses the role of fines on the reputation of the companies penalised; points out that the heavy fines imposed are not deterrent enough, often discounted in advance by businesses and ultimately passed on to consumers; calls on the Commission to make use of all existing remedies;
Amendment 223 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the slowness of the application of antitrust rules; stresses the financial and structural risk to which some actors are exposed if they initiate lengthy and costly proceedings; calls on the Commission to consider setting deadlines and fast track procedures which take into account the economic timeframe of businesses;
Amendment 228 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses the urgent need to adopt precautionaryinterim measures to adapt to the rapid development of new markets and to stop any practice which would seriously harm competition; calls on the Commission to relax the criteria for these measures in order to avoid any irreversible damage;
Amendment 287 #
2019/2131(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21 b. Calls on the Commission to include in the REFIT exercise all State Aid Guidelines that concern sectors which will be directly impacted by the Green Deal in order to check their effectiveness, relevance and that they do not have distortive effects on other sectors;
Amendment 5 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
— having regard to the European Banking Authority (EBA) report of DecNovember 20189 entitled ‘Risk Assessment of the European Banking System’5 ;5, _________________ 5 https://eba.europa.eu/eba-sees-further- improvesites/default/docume nts-in-eu-banks-resilience-but- highlights-challenges-connected-to- profitability-funding-and-operational-risk /files/document_library/Risk%20Analy sis%20and%20Data/Risk%20Assessment %20Reports/2019/Risk%20Assessment%2 0Report_November%202019.PDF
Amendment 16 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 b (new)
Citation 27 b (new)
- having regard to the joint advice of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to the European Commission of April 2019 on the need for improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements in the EU financial sector15b, _________________ 15bJC 2019 26, https://eba.europa.eu/file/102634/downloa d?token=ZR98JZp8
Amendment 18 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 c (new)
Citation 27 c (new)
- having regard to the EBA report of October 2019 entitled 'Report on potential impediments to the cross-border provision of banking and payment services',15c _________________ 15c https://eba.europa.eu/file/178124/downloa d?token=7fFsD9og
Amendment 55 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Rrecalls the progress made regarding the implementation of the Banking Union, namely on risk reduction; stresses, however, that the Union and the banking sector must not become complacent and further progress has to be made, particularly onboth on risk reduction and risk sharing;
Amendment 70 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the support of the [incoming] President of the European Commission and the President of the ECB for the completion of the Banking Union and, more globalbroadly, the Economic and Monetary Union, through the creation of a fiscal capacity designed to provide the euro area with an adequate stabilisation function;
Amendment 135 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Recalls the political mandate given to Commission Vice-President Dombrovskis to deliver an economy that works for people; stresses that the objective of all prospective measures or reforms should be to contribute to the stability or proper functioning of the Banking Union to the benefit of the citizen and the real economy;
Amendment 140 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Underlines that the EU banking sector hosts a plethora of banking models; stresses that all future measures and reforms should take due consideration of the diversity of the EU banking sectors and deliver proportionate measures which will maintain the competitiveness of the sector, both in the internal market and vis-à-vis global markets;
Amendment 171 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that work on the implementation of the final Basel III standards has already started; recalls its resolution of 23 November 2016 on the finalisation of Basel III and the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council of 12 July 2016 and calls on the Commission to act on the recommendations therein when drafting the new legislative proposals; underlines that the Commission should ensure that implementation in the EU is proportionate, and maintains the competitiveness of the EU banking sector, both internally and vis-à-vis global competitors;
Amendment 182 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Requests increased transparency in banking supervision in order to reinforce trust from capital and financial markets, companies and citizens, as well as to ensure consistency of treatment across Member States;
Amendment 185 #
2019/2130(INI)
13. Notes that innovative financial technologies are profoundly transforming the financial sector, including banking and payment services, and welcomes the efficiencies these offer to consumers and the competition these bring to the market; highlights the need to address the challenges posed by these new technologies, such as ensuring sustainable business models that are interoperable across borders, a level playing field in terms of regulation and supervision, and cybersecurity; notes, also, the increasing reliance on cloud-computing by the banking sector and urges the Commission to respond to the Joint Advice of the ESAs on the need for legislative improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements in the EU financial sector;
Amendment 191 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. NotesRecognises the important contribution the 'shadow banking' sector can make to the establishment of the Capital Markets Union by diversifying funding channels; notes, however, that there is considerable interconnectedness between the ‘shadow banking’ sector and the ‘traditional’ banking sector, which has raisesd concerns of systemic risk given the lack of appropriate supervision of the first; calls,; in this regard, calls for the establishment of a macroprudential toolkit to counter threats to financial stability posed by the increasing role of the ‘shadow banking’ system; encourages global standards setters to work to identify and address these risks;
Amendment 203 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the agreement on the exchange of information between the ECB and the AML/CFT supervisors; recalls its serious concern about regulatory and supervisory fragmentation in the AML/CFT area, which has failed to provide adequate oversight and responses to national supervisory authorities’ deficiencies, and is ill-suited to supervise the increasing cross-border activity in the EU; calls on the Commission to start working on the overhaul ofidentifying shortcomings in the EU AML framework, and legislation to effectively address the risks posed by cross-border illegal activityto provide clarity on the division of responsibilities and coordination of cross-border supervision, with legislative measures if necessary; reiterates the importance of a robust and coherent AML/CFT framework to the integrity of the EU financial system and the security of EU citizens;
Amendment 218 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls its resthe evolution of 8 June 2011 on credit rating agencies: future perspectives; notes that the creation of a European credit rating agency would contribute to increasing competition, reducing information asymmetries and increasing transparency for marketthe EU framework for credit rating agencies; notes that sustainability ratings based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria are an important complement to the credit risk assessments provided by credit ratings in channelling funds towards investments in sustainable activities; stresses the importance of ensuring that the development of a market for the provision of sustainability ratings is competitive and not concentrated with a limited number of providers;
Amendment 222 #
2019/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Amendment 27 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a stronger role of the euro, and its increased use as a reserve currency, would increase the EU’s ability to frame its policy stance independently vis-à-vis the US and the Federal Reserve and would ultimately provide protection from the risk of an uncooperative US approach;
Amendment 108 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 2
Paragraph 5 – indent 2
- The completion of the banking union, including a fully mutualised European deposit insurance scheme that would reduce risks, promote fair competition, facilitate the expansion of pan-European banking and reinforce the stability of the euro area as a whole;
Amendment 118 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 3 a (new)
Paragraph 5 – indent 3 a (new)
- The respect of a market-driven economy that refrains from protectionism;
Amendment 126 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 4
Paragraph 5 – indent 4
- The market-led creation of a European safe asset guaranteed by euro-area Member States to foster the integration of bond marketthrough the reform of the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures;
Amendment 155 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the need to monitor the impact that the current monetary policy stance might have on asset prices;
Amendment 196 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Underlines the importance of cooperation between central banks, both in the European Union and at a global level, for the achievement of the inflation targets in the medium term;
Amendment 216 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Takes good note of Christine Lagarde’s declaration of 4 September, in which she welcomed the ECB’s collaboration in the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and commitment to contribute to facinge the challenges which climate change poses by implementing the NGFS’s recommendations and acting oin them substantively wherever possible without underminingfull respect of the ECB’s price stability mandate and other objectives;
Amendment 252 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recognises the importance of small and medium-sized businesses in the EU; invites the ECB to remain attentive to access to credit for these businesses, taking into account the slow economic recovery and in the name of the principle of economic inclusion; reaffirms in this context the European Parliament’s support for investment policies under the “SME supporting factor”;
Amendment 266 #
2019/2129(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the ECB to ensure an appropriate balance between allowingppropriate regulatory constraints, allowing financial innovation in Fintech and ensuring financial stability;
Amendment 7 #
2019/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the importance of the activities of the European Investment Bank (EIB) to increase the current levels of investment in the EU, which are below historical averages and insufficient to fulfil the EU’s sustainability, social, economic and innovation ambitions; stresses that in order to achieve these ambitions, more risk- taking by the EIB may be necessary in parallel to increasing equity and the development of expertise in innovative funding instruments; calls for adequate capitalisation of the EIB to allow for the use of innovative instruments in the financing of projects with substantial potential sustainability, social and innovation gains in the financing of projects with substantial potential sustainability, social, economic, competitiveness and innovation gains;emphasizes the impact and additionalityof EIB to investments across the EU and appreciates its openness to cooperation with partners stated in their 2019 operational plan;
Amendment 49 #
2019/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Emphasizes the key role that EIB plays in EU’s objective to compete in global economy through enhanced innovation and further adoption of digital technologies; calls on the EIB to further promote and provide financial support for investment in digital technologies, digital skills of employees and entrepreneurs, digital infrastructure and capacity- building for entities that require support throughout the digitalization process;
Amendment 52 #
2019/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Takes note of the results of the EIB investment report 2019/2020 with regards to the SMEs and mid-caps finance; stresses the need to develop increased efforts and methods to facilitate access to finance for SMEs and mid-caps across the EU territory and welcomes in this sense the EIB role in the SMEs window budget guarantee of the InvestEU Fund; calls on the EIB to continue and improve its work to tackle barriers to the entry and growth of young SMEs, mid- caps, start-ups and scale-ups and the disparities across countries in the external financing for EU small businesses;
Amendment 65 #
2019/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EIB group to be more transparent about its economic operations, its use of the EU budget guarantee, the additionality of EIB operations and on possible future plans for a development subsidiary at the EIB, and for the EIB group to improve its accountability on these issues; calls on the EIB to further communicate and promote through their liaison offices in the Member States its instruments to national and local public and private actors; calls for a memorandum of understanding between the EIB and Parliament to improve access to EIB documents and data related to strategic orientation and financing policies in the future in order to strengthen the Bank’s accountability.
Amendment 49 #
2019/2110(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Agrees that effective structural reforms, accompanied by well-targeted investments and responsible fiscal policies, continue to provide a successful compass for preparing the EU for its future and present challenges such as strengthening competitiveness while transitioning to a low carbon economy; the digitalization of our societies, the development of research & innovation; the growth of the labour market based on high quality jobs skills and continuing professional training;
Amendment 116 #
2019/2110(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines that reforms which increase competition in product markets, promote resource efficiency, safeguard the long-term sustainability of care and pension systems, promote a better access to finance for SMEs, spin off and start- ups; improve the business environment, as well as quality of institutions, including an effective justice system, and quality and efficiency of tax collection, are essential for achieving greater economic resilience for the euro area and Member States; emphasises in this context the importance of the single market and the need for its further deepening;
Amendment 178 #
2019/2110(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Agrees that the economic upswing needs to be supported by public and private investment, particularly in innovationeducation, research and innovation, the digital transition as well as sustainable transport, and energy solutions, and notes that there is still an investment gap in the euro area; welcomes the fact that in some Member States investments already exceed the pre- crisis level, and regrets that in others investment is still lagging behind or is not picking up at the necessary speed;
Amendment 1 #
2019/2105(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Highlights that the objectives of the Undertaking are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system; points out that the rail mode of transport will be key in the future EU actions to promote a shift to low-emission mobility and tackling negative externalities; stresses that the Undertaking needs to be given the necessary financial, material and human resources to reach these key objectives and to contribute to a real modal shift;
Amendment 2 #
2019/2101(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights the very good results and the essential role played by Clean Sky Joint Undertaking in Europe to ensure net accelerations in green technologies aiming at reducing CO2, gas emissions and noise levels produced by aircrafts; highlights the strategic importance that this joint undertaking should play under the future Horizon Europe programme towards contributing to the new 2050 "climate neutrality" goals;
Amendment 2 #
2019/2100(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the Undertaking ran its operations in full accordance with four different frameworks: the Horizon 2020, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Programme for drone U-space demonstration activities, as well as two specific frameworks for the Active Geo- fencing service (AGS) call and the study to develop a proposal for the future architecture of the European airspace; recognises that these different legal frameworks mean a high degree of complexity for the Undertaking and therefore commends the Undertaking for successfully implementing innovation projects;
Amendment 3 #
2019/2100(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Recalls that SESAR is the technological pillar of Europe Single European Sky (SES) initiative and its role is to coordinate and implement research to contribute overcoming the fragmentation of SES; points out that one of the main achievements of the Undertaking includes the free routing to reduce flight and fuel emissions; believes therefore that the Undertaking could be further used to contribute to the sustainability of the aviation sector;
Amendment 5 #
2019/2100(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Amendment 1 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. AcknowledgUnderlines that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors, the transactions of the European Securities and Markets Authority (the ‘Authority’) underlying the annual accounts for the year 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
Amendment 11 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting fromconstantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks toand the enforcingement and applying Union lawication of Union law; notes that in order to facilitate that evolution, budgetary and personnel resources shouldhave been reallocated internally;
Amendment 13 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Questions whether the resources allocated to the Authority are sufficient to enable it to fully carry out an increasing number of tasks assigned to it, in particular in the fields of securitisation, Prospectus 3 and Money Market Fund (MFF) where the workload has increased but no new staff have been allocated; questions whether using temporary workers and external consultancies rather than increasing the number of its own staff is the best use of resources in the long-term;
Amendment 14 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that opportunities for economies of scale and efficiency gains were not realised due to insufficient use ofthe decision not to have joint procurement procedures between the Authority and the European Banking Authority (EBA) when the Authority moved its seat from London to Paris; calls on the Authority to strengthen cooperation with EBA concerning administrative support services and facility management services, which are not related to the core activities, where feasible;
Amendment 16 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 20 #
2019/2092(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Observes that the cumulated surpluses over the period 2015 to 2018 resulting from fees paid by credit rating agencies and trade repositories in relation to registration, certification and supervision of these entities amounts to EUR 1,1m; is of the opinion that those surpluses should not be used to finance other activities.
Amendment 1 #
2019/2091(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. AcknowledgNotes that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors, the transactions of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (the ‘Authority’) underlying the annual accounts for the year 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
Amendment 13 #
2019/2091(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting fromconstantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks toand enforcing and applying Union law, the Authority’s budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated internally; notesnotes that 32 new staff members are foreseen to fulfil the modified areas of the Agency’s work; notes however that, according to the Court, the Authority has not yet accomplished the shift from regulation to supervision and that the Authority should strengthen human resources assigned to supervision;
Amendment 15 #
2019/2091(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 16 #
2019/2091(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 17 #
2019/2091(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 1 #
2019/2090(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. AcknowledgUnderlines that, in the opinion of the Court, the transactions of the European Banking Authority (the ‘Authority’) underlying the annual accounts for the year 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
Amendment 8 #
2019/2090(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting fromconstantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks toand the enforcingement and applying Union lawication of Union law; notes that in order to facilitate that evolution, budgetary and personnel resources have been reallocated internally;
Amendment 13 #
2019/2090(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 15 #
2019/2090(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 17 #
2019/2090(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 9 #
2019/2081(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Agency’s continued efforts to prepare for its new tasks as defined by the Fourth Railway Package and to take up, in June 2019, its role of EU authority responsible for issuing authorisations for placing railway vehicles on the market, single safety certificates for railway undertaking and ERTMS trackside approvals; welcomes in particular that all the legal texts and Management Board decisions were adopted on time and that the Agency published the Application guide for vehicle authorisation; welcomes the other steps taken by the Agency to prepare for its new tasks (active stakeholders interaction, learning cases and shadow running, pilot National Safety Authorities monitoring); welcomes the development of the One- Stop Shop;
Amendment 13 #
2019/2081(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Highlights the Agency’s strategic role in improving competitiveness of rail with other modes of transport, and in ensuring the safety and interoperability of European rail system; stresses therefore the importance to provide the Agency with the sufficient budgetary means to fulfil its role;
Amendment 16 #
2019/2081(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Welcomes the Agency’s awareness and readiness to take into account the specific need of the small and medium- sized enterprises when implementing the regulation on frees and charges;
Amendment 17 #
2019/2081(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Calls on the Commission to swiftly decide over the Agency’s request for a derogation to its Financial Regulation in order to ensure proper planning of the fees and charges and corresponding commitments and payments in the budget;
Amendment 2 #
2019/2077(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the finding of the Court of Auditors that the accounts of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (before 11 September 2018: European Aviation Safety Agency) ('the Agency') for the 2018 financial year are legal and regular in all material respects;
Amendment 3 #
2019/2077(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Agency’s annual budget for 2018 was EUR 197,89 million, of which EUR 36,9 million came from EU subsidy, EUR 102,93,0 million from fees and charges and EUR 2,20 million from third countries contributions, 1,1 million of other revenues and EUR 54,9 million from fees and charges accumulated surplus; is pleased that budget implementation rate remained very high at 98 %, significantly above the 95 % threshold set by the Commission;; notes that the rate of cancellations of carry-over remains low at 1,8 %, below the 5 % limit set by the Commission; welcomes the fact that achievement of budget implementation and cancellation of amounts carried over targets means that no penalties will be applied to the 2020 EU subsidy;
Amendment 4 #
2019/2077(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. SHighlights the Agency's vital role in ensuring the highest possible level of aviation safety and environmental protection in a fast growing aviation market; stresses that 2018 was a landmark year for the Agency, with the entry into force of the new Regulation on 11 September 20181 ; recognises that the increased responsibilities and workload of the Agency were not accompanied by relatively stablea proportionate increase in resources, which created significant challenges to fulfil its tasks and objectives in 2018, and lead to postponement or deprioritisation of certain activities; reiterates that the Agency should be provided with adequate financial resources and staff, which registered a reduction to 767 staff employed on 31 December 2018 (compared with 771 staff in 2017), in order to perform the important tasks entrusted to it; _________________ 1 Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (OJ L 212, 22.8.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 6 #
2019/2077(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recalls the Agency’s contribution to developing smart standards on noise and CO2 emissions and its responsibility for the environmental certification of aeronautical products, parts and appliances; believes that with further resources the Agency can play a leading role in developing and implementing measures to improve the sustainability of aviation;
Amendment 1 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the finding of the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) that the consolidated accounts of the European Union for the year 2018 are reliable and that the transactions underlying the accounts of the Union for the 2018 financial year are generally legal and regular in all material aspects, except for high-risk expenditure (mainly spending on a reimbursement basis, which is subject to complex rules), which has an estimated error level of 4,5%; notes that the overall estimated level of error of 2,6% is still above the ECA’s materiality threshold (2%); this compares to 2,4% in 2017 and 3,1% in 2016;
Amendment 4 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the completion of the 2017 CEF Transport blending call in 2018 with an innovative approach making available a total indicative budget of EUR 1,35 billion of EU grants to be combined with funding from the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the European Investment Bank, national promotional banks or private investors; notes that the second deadline for submission of proposals in April 2018, focusing on innovation and new technologies projects, notably in the field of alternative fuels, in support of the Commission’s Clean Mobility policy, resulted in 35 projects being selected with a total of EUR 404,8 million in CEF funding; notes the need to improve the level of awareness of the CEF eligibility rules among the beneficiaries, in particular by drawing a clear distinction between implementation contracts and subcontracts; recalls that the amount of money spent under a financial instrument is not its only performance criteria and invites the Commission to deepen its assessment of the achievements completed under EU funded transport projects and to measure their added-value aspect and result-oriented spending;
Amendment 6 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Invites the European TEN-T Coordinators to conduct a thorough assessment of the projects completed and the improvements achieved along the TEN-T corridors under the current programming period, and to present it to Parliament and the Commission; furthermore asks the Commission to propose a new result-oriented mechanism including short, mid and long-term planning and technical assistance, to increase the added value of European Funds and to ensure that Member States will meet the 2030 and 2050 completion targets, respectively for the core and comprehensive networks;
Amendment 7 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the adoption of an amendment to the CEF Multi-annual Work Programme on 19 April 2018, making available a total indicative amount of EUR 450 million for the 2018 call for proposals under the General envelope of CEF Transport to support projects of common interest related to the cross-cutting objectives of transport digitalisation, road safety and multimodality; reminds the importance of coordination of work programmes, in order to exploit synergies between the sectors of transport, energy and telecom; welcomes the adoption of a financing decision establishing the CEF Annual Work Programme, allowing INEA to launch the 2019 CEF Transport call concerning financial assistance through grants for projects of common interest regarding cross-border sections, connections to and the development of maritime ports and mitigation of the impact of rail freight noise and vibrations, with the indicative amount of EUR 100 million made available; recalls that in order to achieve concrete benefits in the transport sector the budget needs to be managed soundly and spent on relevant and suitable investment projects which are then implemented on a timely basis;
Amendment 9 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that by the fifth year of the current programming period 2014-2020 only around 23% of the funds initially awarded had resulted in payments by January 2019, putting into question the full implementation of CEF; reiterates that there is a risk thatin order to avoid payment delays, decommitments and reflows will build up significantly by the end of the programming period and, leaving insufficient time to reroute funds to other projects, it is essential for INEA to monitor the technical and financial implementation of projects closely, so that effective corrective measures can be taken in time; reiterates the recommendations of the Court to the Commission and INEA to ensure greater coherence and transparency of the project selection procedures, to set better conditions for timely programme implementation and to redesign the performance framework to better monitor project results;
Amendment 11 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. RWelcomes the ECA Special report 30/2018 which concludes that the main modes of public transport are covered by EU regulations, making the EU framework for passenger rights unique globally; however, regrets the ECA conclusion that many passengers were not sufficiently aware of their rights and frequently could not benefit from them, due to problems with enforcement; therefore, reiterates the request of the Court to improve coherence, clarity and effectiveness of the EU passenger rights framework, take action to promote awareness campaigns and provide national enforcement bodies with further tools for enforcing passenger rights;
Amendment 14 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates its request that the Commission, in view of the multiple sources of funding, provides an easy access to projects, in form of a one-stop-shop to allow citizens to clearly follow the developments and funding of infrastructures co-financed by Union funds and by the EFSI; these one-stop-shops shall have extensive coordinating powers, with EU rules prevailing, with a multilingual dimension, facilitating the management of all environmental impact assessments; notes that in the fifth year of the 2014-2020 multi-annual financial framework the absorption of EFSI funds has continued to be slower than planned; stresses that the errors detected are at the level of the beneficiary, so more guidance is needed as regards cost eligibility; highlights the need for simplification of administrative procedures;
Amendment 15 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes that the number of financial instruments has increased considerably which allows for new blending opportunities in the transport sector, while at the same time creating a complex web of arrangements around the Union budget; is concerned that these instruments alongside the Union budget could risk undermining the level of accountability and transparency, as reporting, audit and public scrutiny are not aligned; calls upon the Commission to find how the Union budgetary system could be reformed, in particular as how best to ensure that overall funding arrangements are not more complex than necessary to meet Union policy objectives and guarantee accountability, transparency and auditability;
Amendment 18 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. WHighlights that the transport infrastructure policy offers a clear opportunity to increase synergies between defence and civil needs and TEN-T; welcomes the addition of a pillar of military mobility to TEN-T policy with the adoption of the Action Plan in March 2018 and the proposal by the Commission to include a new envelope dedicated to military mobility needs of EUR 6,5 billion under the CEF budget for 2021-2027; stresses the importance of analysis of gaps between the military and the TEN-T requirements for generating the pipeline for dual-use infrastructure projects that could be supported under the CEF 2021-2027 and strengthen TEN-T; reiterates that this development reflects the strategic role played by the TEN-T in integrating the Union’s infrastructure in order to achieve rapid and seamless mobility across the continent, as well as strengthening our capacity to respond to emergency situations such as humanitarian crises, natural disasters or civil emergencies, thus further developing the internal market;
Amendment 21 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. RBelieves that the tourism sector is extremely related to the transport sector; therefore, reiterates its request to add a budget line in future budgets of the Union dedicated to tourism in order to support actions for the development of a sustainable tourism sector; stresses its importance and economic impact on growth, competitiveness, employment and social development;
Amendment 22 #
2019/2055(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Encourages the Commission to publish, in cooperation with the Member States, an annual overview of transport and tourism projects that have been co- financed through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion fund, as it is practised for the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF);
Amendment 8 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the 2020 budget to contribute to the fulfilment of the priorities outlined in the European Semester, namely to deliver high-quality investment and reforms that increase productivity growth, foster growth and competitiveness, continuing to ensure macro-financial stability and sound public finances, and deepening the Single Markedeepening and strengthening the Single Market, including the digital component, as well as the completion of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU);
Amendment 20 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the importance of ensuring sufficient resources for the coordination and surveillance of macroeconomic policies, financial crime, anti-money laundering as well as transparent communication to EU citizens on these measures;
Amendment 21 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates that the provisional agreement on the regulation setting up the Invest EU Programme1 contains a general provision - applicable to all transport related financing - ensuring that "ProjectOperations that are inconsistent with the achievement of the climate objectives shallould not be eligible for support" and that all projects "shall be screened"Investment projects receiving substantial Union support, notably in the area of infrastructure should be screened by the implementing partner to determine if they have an environmental, climate or social impact and if so, shallould be subject to climate, environmental and social sustainability proofing"sustainability proofing (...)"; recalls that Invest EU Fund should support investments contributing to greater economic, territorial and social cohesion in the Union and that, in order to maximise the impact and the added value of EU financing support, it is appropriate to maximise “synergies across relevant Union programmes in areas such as transport, energy and digitalisation”; _________________ 1 European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 April 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the InvestEU Programme (COM(2018)0439 – C8-0257/2018 – 2018/0229(COD)).
Amendment 24 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Further calls for the budget to contribute to fulfilling policy priorities in terms of the completion of the Capital Markets Union, including fostering an investment environment which will improve access to finance for market participants, particularly SMEs and start- ups;
Amendment 28 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) spending in the field of transport can be improved by increasing further the share of funding for zero emission transport modes; recalls that the CEF is an extremely important and vital financial instrument in the transport sector and the short and long term planning of spending should take into consideration a result-oriented approach and seek for and EU added value, especially regarding the development and completion of the TEN-T core and comprehensive networks; welcomes the approach of the Commission to co-finance the re-establishment of regional cross- border rail connections that were dismantled or abandoned and encourages the Members States, cross-border regions and the Commission to further intensify these bottom-up projects that contribute to reopening borders in the EU where they still exist; calls on the Commission to significantly increase the reserved amount within the CEF budget line for financing for the re-establishment of regional missing rail links that were dismantled or abandoned; calls on the Commission to take into account the still large divergences in terms of transport infrastructure across the EU; further electrification of railway infrastructure must be intensified and a quicker roll out of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is required; the CEF budget should also take account of rail freight noise abatement measures in order to ensure a sustainable and efficient freight transport system;
Amendment 43 #
2019/2028(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. In light of the still very high number of deaths and injuries caused by traffic accidents, and the new Directive on road infrastructure safety management with its provision ensuring that “Member States shall ensure that the needs of vulnerable road users are taken into account”, insists that the Commission and Member States further prioritise the financing of the transport safety of passengers in different means of transport and that they focus on the safety of vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and other micro- mobility users; calls on the Commission to provide the necessary technical and administrative assistance to Member States concerning the adequate maintenance measures of the existing roads in their respective comprehensive transport plans, in order to increase the quality and safety of roads;
Amendment 11 #
2019/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The type-approval requirements relating to emissions from motor vehicles have been gradually and significantly tightened through the introduction and subsequent revision of Euro standards. While vehicles in general have delivered substantial emission reductions across the range of regulated pollutants, this was not the case for NOx emissions from diesel engines or particles for gasoline direct injection engines, installed in particular in light-duty vehicles. Actions for correcting this situation are thereforeTo achieve a further reduction of NOx emission in real driving conditions the development of new technologies via certification and standardisation of PEMS devices is needed.
Amendment 12 #
2019/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Commission performed a detailed analysis of the procedures, tests and requirements for type approval that are set out in Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 on the basis of own research and external information and found that the emissions generated by real driving on the road of Euro 5 or Euro 6 vehicles in almost all cases substantially exceed the emissions measured on the regulatory New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), in particular with respect to NOx emissions of diesel vehicles.
Amendment 54 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) For efficiency reasons and in order to decrease costs, ETIAS should, as provided for in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, re-use hardware and software components developed for the Entry/Exit System (‘EES’) for the development of the shared identity repository. This repository used for the storage of the identity alphanumeric data of both ETIAS applicants and third-country nationals registered in the EES, should be developed in a way enabling its extension to become the future Common Identity Repository. In the same spirit, the tool to be established to enable ETIAS to compare its data with the ones of every other system consulted through a single query should be developed in a way enabling its evolution to become the future European Search Portal.
Amendment 59 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The access rights and conditions under which the ETIAS Central Unit and ETIAS National Units may consult data stored in other EU information systems for the purposes of ETIAS should be safeguarded by clear and precise rules regarding the access by the ETIAS Central Unit and ETIAS National Units to the data stored in other EU information systems, the type of queries and categories of data, all of which should be limited to what is strictly necessary for the performance of their duties. In the same vein, the data stored in the ETIAS application file should only be visible to those Member States that are operating the underlying information systems in accordance with the modalities of their participation. As an example, the provisions of this Regulation relating to the Schengen Information System and the Visa Information System constitute provisions building upon all the provisions of the Schengen acquis, for which the Council Decisions35 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System and the Visa Information System are relevant. _________________ 35 Council Decision 2010/365/EU of 29 June 2010 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania ( OJ L 166, 1.7.2010, p. 17); Council Decision (EU) 2017/733 of 25 April 2017 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Croatia (OJ L 108, 26.4.2017, p. 31); Council Decision (EU) 2017/1908 of 12 October 2017 on the putting into effect of certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 269, 19.10.2017, p. 39–43); Council Decision (EU) 2018/934 of 25 June 2018 on the putting into effect of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 165, 2.7.2018, p. 37).
Amendment 60 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) According to Article 73 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the European agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice ('eu- LISA'), established by Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 , should be responsible for the design and technical development phase of the ETIAS Information System. _________________ 36Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 99).
Amendment 64 #
2019/0002(COD)
(4 a) The ETIAS Central Unit shall provide periodical reports to the Commission and eu-Lisa concerning false hits generated during the automated processing referred to in Article 20 (2). The ETIAS Central Unit shall seek the cooperation and information from ETIAS National Units in this regard.
Amendment 66 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 11– paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 11– paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
[Interoperability shall rely on the European Search Portal (‘ESP’), established by Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2018/XXX (interoperability). During a transitional period, before the ESP is available, the automated processing shall rely on a tool developed by eu-LISA for the purpose of this paragraph. This tool shall be used as the basis for the development and implementation of the ESP, in accordance with Article 52 of that Regulation]9/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council (interoperability).
Amendment 71 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 11 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
Where hits are identified, the tool referred to in Article 11,ESP shall makprovide temporarily availablend read-only access to the results in the application file to the ETIAS Central Unit, until the end of the manual process pursuant to Article 22(2) and Article 23(2). Where the data made available correspond to those of the applicant or where doubts remain, the unique ID code of the data having triggered a hit shall be kept in the application file.
Amendment 73 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 11 – paragraph 9
Article 11 – paragraph 9
9. A hit shall be triggered where all or some of the data from the ETIAS application file used for the query correspond fully or partially to the data present in a record, alert or file of the other EU information systems consulted. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, define partial correspondence, including a degree of probability to limit the number of false hits and to limit the number of ETIAS queries to what is necessary..
Amendment 75 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 11 – paragraph 10
Article 11 – paragraph 10
10. For the purpose of paragraph 1, the Commission, shall, by means of an implementing delegated act, define the technical modalities for the implementation of Article 24(6)(c)(ii) and Article 54(1)(b) related to data retention while fully respecting the principle of data minimisation and the relevant retention periods.
Amendment 78 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EU) 2018/ 1240
Article 11 – paragraph 11
Article 11 – paragraph 11
For the purpose of Article 25(2), Article 28(8) and Article 29(9) when registering the data related to hits into the ETIAS application file, the origin of the data shall be indicated. This shall include the type of the alert, except for alerts referred to in Article 23(1), the source of the data (which other EU information systems or Europol data), the unique identification number used in the source of the data having triggered the hit and the Member State that entered or supplied the data having triggered the hit and, where available, the date and time when the data was entered in the other EU information systems or Europol data. When a hit leads to a negative decision, and without prejudice to any limitations existing in the EU information system that has triggered the hit, the applicant shall be informed of the system which generated the hit for the purposes of ensuring the applicant's right to an effective remedy.
Amendment 88 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 12 – paragraph 2 (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 (new)
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, a cooperation agreement is to be agreed upon between the European Union and INTERPOL. This cooperation agreement shall provide for the modalities for the exchange of information and safeguards for the protection of personal data. and subject to Article 218 TFEU;
Amendment 98 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Article 1 – paragraph 10
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240
Article 25a – paragraph 2
Article 25a – paragraph 2
2. The ETIAS National Units shall also have access to the national criminal records registers in order to obtain the information on third country national and stateless persons convicted for a terrorist offence or any other serious criminal offences as specified in the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2018/ 1240 for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 115 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008
Article 18b – paragraph 1
Article 18b – paragraph 1
1. From the start of operations of ETIAS, as provided for in Article 88(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the ‘CS-VIS’ shall be connected to the tool referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240ESP to enable the automated processing referred to in that Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/ 1240.
Amendment 116 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008
Article 18b – paragraph 2
Article 18b – paragraph 2
2. The automated processing referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 shall enable the verifications provided for in Article 20 of that Regulation and the subsequent verifications of Articles 22 and 26 of that Regulation. For the purpose of proceeding to the verifications point (i) of Article 20(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the ETIAS Central System shall use the tool referred to in Article 11 of that RegulationESP to compare the data in ETIAS with the data in the VIS, in accordance with Article 11(8) of that Regulation, using the correspondences listed in the table in annex II.
Amendment 117 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008
Article 18c – paragraph 1
Article 18c – paragraph 1
1. The ETIAS Central Unit, established within the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, shall have, for the purpose of performing its tasks conferred on it by Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the right to access and search relevant data in VIS in a read-only format and in accordance with Article 11(8) of that Regulation.
Amendment 120 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008
Article 18d – paragraph 2
Article 18d – paragraph 2
2. The ETIAS National Units, designated pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, shall have temporary access to and may consult VIS, in a read- only format, for the purpose of examining applications for travel authorisation pursuant to Article 8(2) of that Regulation. The ETIAS National Units may consult the data referred to in Articles 9 to 14 of this Regulation.
Amendment 128 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2017/2226
Article 25a – paragraph 1
Article 25a – paragraph 1
1. The ETIAS Central Unit, established within the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, shall have, for the purpose of performing its tasks conferred on it by Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the right to access and search data in the EES in a read-only format and in accordance with Article 11(8) of that Regulation.
Amendment 135 #
2019/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/1861
Article 36a – paragraph 1
Article 36a – paragraph 1
1. The ETIAS Central Unit, established within the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, shall have, for the purpose of performing its tasks conferred on it by Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the right to access and search relevant data entered in SIS. The provisions in a read- only format. The provisions of points (4) to (8) of Article 36(4)-(8) apply to this access and search.
Amendment 40 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) For efficiency reasons and in order to decrease costs, ETIAS should, as provided for in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, re-use hardware and software components developed for the Entry/Exit System (‘EES’) for the development of the shared identity repository. This repository used for the storage of the identity alphanumeric data of both ETIAS applicants and third-country nationals registered in the EES, should be developed in a way enabling its extension to become the future Common Identity Repository. In the same spirit, the tool to be established to enable ETIAS to compare its data with the ones of every other system consulted through a single query should be developed in a way enabling its evolution to become the future European Search Portal.
Amendment 41 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) The European Search Portal (ESP), established by Regulation (EU) 2019/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council will enable competent authorities to simultaneously query the underlying systems and the combined results will be displayed on a single screen.
Amendment 45 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) According to Article 73 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the European agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice ('eu- LISA'), established by Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 , should be responsible for the design and technical development phase of the ETIAS Information System. _________________ 30Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 99).
Amendment 49 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/1862
Article 50b – paragraph 1
Article 50b – paragraph 1
1. From the start of operations of ETIAS, as provided for in Article 88(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the Central System of SIS shall be connected to the tool referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240ESP to enable the automated processing referred to in that Article.
Amendment 50 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/1862
Article 50b – paragraph 3
Article 50b – paragraph 3
3. For the purpose of verifications referred to in Article 20(2)(a), (d) and (m)(i) and Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, the ETIAS Central System shall use the tool referred to in Article 11 of that RegulationESP to compare the data referred to in Article 11(5) Regulation 2018/1240 to data in SIS, in accordance with Article 11(8) of that Regulation.
Amendment 54 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2019/816
Article 1 – point d
Article 1 – point d
the conditions under which data included in the ECRIS-TCN system may be used forby the purpose of border managementETIAS Central Unit for identifying an application that might be security risk to the Schengen area, for the purpose of ETIAS, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
Amendment 59 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2019/816
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
This Regulation applies to the processing of identity information of third country nationals who have been subject to convictions in the Member States for the purpose of identifying the Member State(s) where such convictions were handed down, as well as for the purposes of border management [and contributing to facilitating and assisting in the correct identification of persons] that pose a security risk.
Amendment 73 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/816
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where applicable, a flag indicating that the person concerned has been convicted for a terrorist offence or any other serious criminal offence, as s specified in the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 punishable under national law with a detention sentence of at least three years and in those cases the code of the convicting Member State(s).;
Amendment 78 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2019/816
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. In the event of a hit, the Central System [or the CIR] shall automatically provide the competent authority with information on the Member State(s) holding criminal record information on the third country national, along with the associated reference number(s) referred to in Article 5(1) and any corresponding identity information. Such identity information shall only be used for the purpose of verification of the identity of the third country national concerned. The result of a search in the Central System may only be used for the purpose of making a request according to Article 6 of Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA, a request referred to in Article 16(4) of this Regulation, or for the purposes of border management [ and facilitating and assisting in the correct identification of persons registered in the ECRIS-TCN system].;
Amendment 88 #
2019/0001(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) 2019/816
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The data included in the Central System [and the CIR] shall only be processed for the purpose of the identification of the Member State(s) holding the criminal records information of third country nationals, as well as for the purposes of border management [ as well as for facilitating and assisting in the correct identification of persons registered in the ECRIS-TCN system] for the purposes of ETIAS.;
Amendment 15 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , it is important that the obligation on a payment service provider, to retain and provide information in relation to a cross-border payment transaction, should be proportionate and should only be what is necessary for Member States to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Furthermore, the only information relating to the payer that should be retained is where the payer is located. With regard to information relating to the payee and the payment transaction itself, payment service providers should only be required to retain and transmit to tax authorities information which is necessary for tax authorities to detect possible fraudsters and to carry out VAT controls. Therefore, payment service providers should only be required to retain records on cross-border payment transactions which are likely to indicate economic activities. The introduction of a ceiling based on the number of payments received by a payee over the course of a calendar quarter would give a reliable indication that those payments were received as part of an economic activity, thereby excluding payments for non- commercial reasons. Where such a ceiling is reached, the accounting obligation of the payment service provider would be triggered. In order to ensure proportionality, and, furthermore, to ensure adherence with data protection provisions, payment service providers should be permitted to report transactions on an aggregated basis where appropriate. _________________ 46Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L119, 04.05.2016, p.1).
Amendment 19 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Several payment service providers may be involved in one single payment from a payer to a payee. That single payment may give rise to several transfers of funds between the different payment service providers. It is necessary that all payment service providers involved in a given payment, unless a specific exclusion is applicable, have a record keeping and reporting obligation. Those records and reports should be proportionate and contain information on the payment from the initial payer to the final payee and not on the intermediate transfers of funds between the payment service providers.
Amendment 20 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
Recital 8 b (new)
(8 b) The record keeping and reporting obligation should also arise in cases where a payment service provider receives funds or acquires payment transactions on behalf of the payee and not only where a payment service provider transfers funds or issues payments instruments for the payer.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 c (new)
Recital 8 c (new)
(8 c) Obligations stipulated in this Directive should not apply to payment service providers falling outside the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/2366. Therefore, when the payment service providers of the payee are not located in a Member State, the payer’s payment service providers should keep records and report the information on the cross-border payment. Conversely, in order for the record keeping and reporting obligation to be proportionate, when both the payer’s and the payee’s payment service providers are located in a Member State, only the payee’s payment service providers should keep records of that information. For the purposes of the record keeping and reporting obligation, a payment service provider should be considered to be located in a Member State when his BIC or unique business identifier refers to that Member State.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – introductory phrase
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – introductory phrase
2. The requirement referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply in circumstances where both of the following conditions are met:to which payment service providers are subject to under paragraph 1 shall apply where, in the course of a calendar quarter, a payment service provider provides payment services corresponding to more than 25 cross- border payments to the same payee. The cross-border payments referred to in subparagraph 1 shall be calculated by reference to the payment services provided by the payment service provider per Member State and per identifiers referred to in Article 243c(2). Where the payment service provider has information that the payee has several identifiers the calculation shall be made per payee.
Amendment 27 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 28 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 31 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
3. The records referred to in paragraph 1 shall:quirement referred to in paragraph 1 shall not apply to payment services provided by the payment service providers of the payer as regards each payment where at least one of the payment service providers of the payee is located in a Member State according to the BIC or any other business identifier code that unambiguously identifies the payment service provider and its location. A payment service provider of the payer shall in any case include these payment services in the calculation referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 32 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 35 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 36 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3a (new)
Article 243b – paragraph 3a (new)
Amendment 37 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the IBAN of the payer’s payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and his location;
Amendment 39 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where none of the identifiers referred to in subparagraph (a) is applicable, the BIC or any other business identifier code that unambiguously identifies the payment service provider acting on behalf of the payer, as well as the location of that payment service provider.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
1. The records kept by the payment service providers, in accordance with Article 243b, with regards to cross border payments, shall contain the following information:
Amendment 42 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) any executed payment refunds for payment transactions referred to in point (g), if available;
Amendment 739 #
2018/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Amendment 743 #
2018/0108(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Such right to an effective remedy shall be exercised before a court in the issuing State and the enforcing State in accordance with its national law and shall include the possibility to challenge the legality of the measure, including its necessity and proportionality.