BETA

Activities of Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN

Plenary speeches (248)

Establishment of the European Monetary Fund (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0333R(APP)
Establishing the Fiscalis programme for cooperation in the field of taxation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0233(COD)
Presentation of the programme of activities of the Romanian Presidency (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Results of the Eurogroup and preparation of the EURO Summit (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Interim report on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Parliament's position with a view to an agreement (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0166R(APP)
Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of border checks - Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0408(COD)
Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0412(COD)
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system - Rates of value added tax (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0005(CNS)
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2689(RSP)
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2008(INI)
State of the Union (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Conclusion of the third economic adjustment programme for Greece (debate) RO
2016/11/22
European Defence Industrial Development Programme (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0125(COD)
The Economic and Monetary Union package (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2724(RSP)
2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and own resources (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2714(RSP)
Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 package (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Annual Report on Competition Policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2191(INI)
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2573(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2018 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2226(INI)
Banking Union - Annual Report 2017 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2072(INI)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0138(CNS)
Removal of several third countries from the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Decision adopted on the EU Enlargement Strategy - Western Balkans (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Report on the inquiry into money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2013(INI)
Extension of the duration of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0276(COD)
Transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0360B(COD)
Paradise papers (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation - Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0226(COD)
CE marked fertilising products (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0084(COD)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 19 and 20 October 2017 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Fiscal compact and its incorporation into the EU legal framework (topical debate) RO
2016/11/22
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0221(COD)
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0287(COD)
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0030(COD)
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0107(COD)
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) - Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0298(NLE)
Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0007(COD)
European standards for the 21st century (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2274(INI)
Reflection paper on the deepening of the EMU by 2025 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Digitising European industry - Internet connectivity for growth, competitiveness and cohesion: European gigabit society and 5G (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2271(INI)
Harnessing globalisation by 2025 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
FinTech: the influence of technology on the future of the financial sector (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2243(INI)
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 - Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2099(INI)
State of play of the second review of the economic adjustment programme for Greece (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Money market funds (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0306(COD)
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0268(COD)
Follow-up of TAXE recommendations and update on the reform of the Code of conduct Group on business taxation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0121(COD)
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2328(INI)
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union - Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty - Budgetary capacity for the Eurozone (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2249(INI)
A European Pillar of Social Rights (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2095(INI)
2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2047(BUD)
Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2033(INI)
Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0091(COD)
Access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0209(CNS)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2016 priorities (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2101(INI)
Sustainable finance (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Macroeconomic situation in Greece, structural reforms and their impact, as well as prospects for future negotiations within the Programme (debate) RO
2016/11/22
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 9 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2898(RSP)
Apple state-aid decision (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Agenda of the next sitting : see Minutes RO
2016/11/22
Towards a new energy market design - EU strategy on heating and cooling (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2322(INI)
Preparation of the post-electoral revision of the MFF 2014-2020: Parliament's input ahead of the Commission's proposal (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2353(INI)
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (TAXE 2) (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2038(INI)
Renewable energy progress report - Implementation report on the Energy Efficiency Directive (continuation of debate) RO
2016/11/22
Mid-term review of the Investment Plan (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Rules against certain tax avoidance practices (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0011(CNS)
International Accounting Standards (IAS) evaluation (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2006(INI)
The Single Market strategy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2354(INI)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU - New territorial development tools in cohesion policy 2014-2020 - Acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2224(INI)
Discharge 2014 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2205(DEC)
Decision adopted on public tax transparency (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2252(INI)
Banking Union - Annual report 2015 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2221(INI)
Posting of workers (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 18 and 19 February 2016 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0124(COD)
European Central Bank annual report for 2014 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2115(INI)
Towards a Digital Single Market Act (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2147(INI)
Annual report on EU Competition Policy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2140(INI)
Stocktaking and challenges of the EU Financial Services Regulation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2106(INI)
Euro area recommendation - Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Euro area recommendation - Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Towards a European Energy Union - Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
Implementation and legacy of the European Year for Development (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2066(INI)
Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals - Anti-dumping measures and their effect on the EU steel industry (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2211(INI)
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities - Steps towards completing the Economic and Monetary Union (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2210(INI)
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation - EU-Switzerland agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information - Taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments: repealing the Savings Directive (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0076(NLE)
Decision adopted on the Capital Markets Union package (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Payment services in the internal market (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0264(COD)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0160(COD)
Decision adopted on 15 July 2015 on the energy summer package (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Sustainability of healthcare systems in Europe: future challenges (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2208(INI)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
European energy security strategy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
ACER - Human resources for monitoring wholesale energy markets (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0314(COD)
European Investment Bank annual report 2013 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2156(INI)
Money market funds (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0306(COD)
Amendment of the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0010(APP)
Annual Tax report - Decision adopted on the Tax Transparency policy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2144(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2015 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2015 - Single market governance within the European Semester 2015 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2212(INI)
European long-term investment funds (continuation of debate) RO
2016/11/22
Annual report on EU competition policy (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2158(INI)
Decision adopted on a Strategic framework for the Energy Union (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Preparation of the informal meeting of Heads of State or Government (12 February 2015) (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Promotion of employee financial participation (debate) RO
2016/11/22
European fund for strategic investments (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (18 December 2014) (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Economic governance review of the 6-pack and 2-pack regulations (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Economic governance review of the 6-pack and 2-pack regulations (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0250(COD)
Assessment of good repute of transport operators (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Evaluation of the bank stress tests (debate) RO
2016/11/22
The powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions - Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0808(CNS)
Association agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova - Conclusion of an Association agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0083(NLE)
Fight against tax avoidance (debate) RO
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2059(INI)
Structural shortage of payments in the Horizon 2020 budget (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Statement by the candidate for President of the Commission (debate)
2016/11/22
Adoption by Lithuania of the euro on 1 January 2015 (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Programme of activities of the Italian Presidency (debate) RO
2016/11/22
Preparation of the Employment Summit - European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - Renewed Social Agenda - Active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2330(INI)
Facility providing mid-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments - Facility providing mid-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0053(CNS)
Common rules for the internal market in electricity - Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators - Access to the network: cross-border exchanges in electricity - Internal market in natural gas - Conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks - Fuel efficiency: labelling of tyres - The energy performance of buildings (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0198(COD)
ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund: provisions relating to financial management - New types of costs eligible for a contribution from the ESF - Investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy for housing (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on ERDF) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0232(COD)
Food prices in Europe (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2175(INI)
Preparation of the European Council (19-20 March 2008) - European Economic Recovery Plan - Guidelines for the Member States’ employment policies - Cohesion Policy: investing in the real economy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0252(CNS)
Annual Report (2007) on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP - European Security Strategy and ESDP - The role of NATO in the security architecture of the EU (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2241(INI)
2050: The future begins today − Recommendations for the EU's future integrated policy on climate change (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2105(INI)
Presentation of the Czech Presidency's programme (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council (11-12 December 2008) (debate)
2016/11/22
Hill and mountain farming (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2066(INI)
Equality between women and men - 2008 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2047(INI)
Report on the ECB annual report for 2007 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2107(INI)
Conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks - Internal market in natural gas - European strategic energy technology plan (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0199(COD)
Creation of a Roma fingerprints database in Italy (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council following the Irish referendum (debate)
2016/11/22
Measures to combat the rise in oil prices (debate)
2016/11/22
EU-United States summit
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2530(RSP)
Situation of the Roma in Italy (debate)
2016/11/22
The challenge of EU Development Cooperation Policy for the new Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/2140(INI)
Proposals on energy and climate change (debate)
2016/11/22
Traditional, VAT- and GNI based own resources and measures to meet cash requirements - Implementing measures for the system of own resources - System of own resources - Implementing measures for the system of own resources (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0185(CNS)
Infringements of competition law (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0185(COD)
European long-term investment funds (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0214(COD)
Framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Deposit guarantee schemes (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0150(COD)
Payment accounts (A7-0398/2013 - Jürgen Klute)
2016/11/22
Enhancing worker mobility by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0214(COD)
Role and operations of the Troika with regard to the euro area programme countries - Employment and social aspects of the role and operations of the Troika (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2007(INI)
Union programme in the field of financial reporting and auditing 2014-2020 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0364(COD)
Union programme in the field of financial reporting and auditing 2014-2020 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0364(COD)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual growth survey 2014 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects - Single market governance (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2194(INI)
Copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0180(COD)
Criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0297(COD)
Resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0253(COD)
Respect for the fundamental right of free movement in the EU (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2960(RSP)
Reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2006(INI)
CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0191(COD)
European Central Bank annual report for 2012 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2076(INI)
Call for a measurable and tangible commitment against tax evasion and tax avoidance in the EU (debate)
2016/11/22
Payment accounts (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0139(COD)
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund 2014-2020 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0269(COD)
Programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0428(COD)
Action programme for taxation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0341B(COD)
Action programme for taxation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0341B(COD)
Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 - Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2152(ACI)
Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014 - all sections (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2145(BUD)
Recognition of professional qualifications and administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0435(COD)
Making the internal energy market work - Micro-generation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0288(COD)
Closure of Greek national broadcasting company (debate)
2016/11/22
Closure of Greek national broadcasting company (debate)
2016/11/22
Implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0168(COD)
Laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2021(INI)
Reforming the structure of the EU banking sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0084(COD)
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings - Transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0308(COD)
Annual report on competition policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2306(INI)
Customs enforcement of intellectual property rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0137(COD)
Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2025(INI)
Specific tasks for the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions - European Banking Authority and prudential supervision of credit institutions (debate)
2016/11/22
Renewable energy in the European internal energy market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0309(COD)
Offshore oil and gas prospection, exploration and production activities (debate)
2016/11/22
Current situation in Cyprus (debate)
2016/11/22
Credit institutions and prudential supervision - Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0203(COD)
Financial assistance for Member States whose currency is not the euro (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0164(APP)
Timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0202(COD)
System of national and regional accounts (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0374(COD)
Integration of migrants, its effects on the labour market and the external dimension of social security coordination (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2131(INI)
Energy roadmap 2050 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2103(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual growth survey 2013 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the annual growth survey 2013 - Governance of the single market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2260(INL)
Public finances in EMU - 2011 and 2012 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2274(INI)
Enhanced cooperation on the financial transaction tax (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0298(APP)
Cases of restructuring in the European car industry (debate)
2016/11/22
Markets in financial instruments and repeal of Directive 2004/39/EC - Markets in financial instruments and amendment of the EMIR Regulation on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0296(COD)
Markets in financial instruments and repeal of Directive 2004/39/EC - Markets in financial instruments and amendment of the EMIR Regulation on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0296(COD)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2012 priorities (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2150(INI)
Energy efficiency (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0172(COD)
Outcome of the Rio+20 Summit (20-22 June 2012) (debate)
2016/11/22
Access to basic banking services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2055(INL)
Order of business
2016/11/22
European Semester (debate)
2016/11/22
Common system for taxing financial transactions (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0261(CNS)
Internal market scoreboard (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2155(INI)
Common consolidated corporate tax base (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0058(CNS)
Enlargement report for Turkey (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2889(RSP)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (1-2 March 2012) (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparation for the European Council meeting (1-2 March 2012) (debate)
2016/11/22
Feasibility of introducing stability bonds (debate)
2016/11/22
Danish Presidency Programme (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Recent political developments in Hungary (debate)
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (8-9 December 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparations for the European Council meeting (8-9 December 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
Economic governance
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (23 October 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
European Semester 2011: first lessons (debate)
2016/11/22
The future of VAT (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2082(INI)
Future of the European Globalisation Fund - Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0147(COD)
An effective raw materials strategy for Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2056(INI)
Supplementary supervision of financial entities in a financial conglomerate (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0232(COD)
Supplementary supervision of financial entities in a financial conglomerate (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0232(COD)
Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0306(NLE)
A new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Stress tests of the EU banking sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Lessons to be drawn for nuclear safety in Europe following the nuclear accident in Japan
2016/11/22
Innovative financing at a global and European level (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2105(INI)
Adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2239(INI)
Patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0142(COD)
State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0220(NLE)
Alternative investment fund managers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0064(COD)
Sludge catastrophe in Hungary (debate)
2016/11/22
Financial supervision package (debate)
2016/11/22
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0115(NLE)
Specific tasks for the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board - Powers of the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority - European Securities and Markets Authority - Macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishment of a European Systemic Risk Board - European Banking Authority - European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority - Cross-Border Crisis Management in the Banking Sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0161(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2070(DEC)
Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0172(NLE)
Motor Vehicle Block Exemption Regulation (debate)
2016/11/22
Internal Market Scoreboard - Consumer protection - SOLVIT (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2141(INI)
Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation - Mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures - Reverse charge mechanism: goods and services susceptible to fraud - Promoting Good Governance in Tax Matters (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0007(CNS)
Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation - Mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures - Reverse charge mechanism: goods and services susceptible to fraud - Promoting Good Governance in Tax Matters (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0007(CNS)
Democratisation in Turkey (debate)
2016/11/22
Medium-term financial assistance for Member States’ balances of payments and social conditionality (debate)
2016/11/22
Restructuring of the European car industry, in particular the Opel case (debate)
2016/11/22
Presentation of the work programme of the Swedish Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22

Reports (6)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20 PDF (621 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2016/0110(COD)
Documents: PDF(621 KB) DOC(61 KB)
REPORT on International Accounting Standards (IAS) evaluation and the activities of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) and the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) PDF (341 KB) DOC (145 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2016/2006(INI)
Documents: PDF(341 KB) DOC(145 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-2020 PDF (264 KB) DOC (381 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2012/0364(COD)
Documents: PDF(264 KB) DOC(381 KB)
REPORT on the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an action programme for taxation in the European Union for the period 2014-2020 (Fiscalis 2020) and repealing Decision No°1482/2007/EC PDF (287 KB) DOC (406 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2011/0341B(COD)
Documents: PDF(287 KB) DOC(406 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 98/78/EC, 2002/87/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards the supplementary supervision of financial entities in a financial conglomerate PDF (510 KB) DOC (851 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2010/0232(COD)
Documents: PDF(510 KB) DOC(851 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a Council directive concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures PDF (190 KB) DOC (223 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2009/0007(CNS)
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(223 KB)

Shadow reports (6)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘Fiscalis’ programme for cooperation in the field of taxation PDF (682 KB) DOC (98 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2018/0233(COD)
Documents: PDF(682 KB) DOC(98 KB)
REPORT on the Annual Report on Competition Policy PDF (504 KB) DOC (105 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2017/2191(INI)
Documents: PDF(504 KB) DOC(105 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of gross national income at market prices (GNI Regulation) repealing Council Directive 89/130/EEC, Euratom and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1287/2003 PDF (200 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2017/0134(COD)
Documents: PDF(200 KB) DOC(68 KB)
REPORT on the Annual Tax Report PDF (195 KB) DOC (128 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2014/2144(INI)
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(128 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/96/EU on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States PDF (211 KB) DOC (329 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/0400(CNS)
Documents: PDF(211 KB) DOC(329 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union PDF (279 KB) DOC (458 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2010/0374(COD)
Documents: PDF(279 KB) DOC(458 KB)

Opinions (4)

OPINION Proposal for a Council regulation establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers
2016/11/22
Committee: BUDG
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(323 KB)
OPINION Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions : Stepping up the fight against undeclared work
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Documents: PDF(96 KB) DOC(73 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of the Consumer Credit Directive 2008/48/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(85 KB)
OPINION on proposed interim measures for the freezing and disclosure of debtors’ assets in cross-border cases
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(83 KB)

Shadow opinions (2)

OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2013/0152(COD)
Documents: PDF(259 KB) DOC(465 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an action programme for taxation in the European Union for the period 2014-2020 (FISCALIS) and repeal of Decision No 1482/2007/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2011/0341B(COD)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(485 KB)

Institutional motions (4)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts PDF (185 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2689(RSP)
Documents: PDF(185 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the massacres in eastern Congo PDF (279 KB) DOC (82 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
Documents: PDF(279 KB) DOC(82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the massacres in eastern Congo PDF (174 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on delays in the start-up of cohesion policy for 2014-2020 PDF (132 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2946(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(63 KB)

Oral questions (5)

Breaches of the rights of children whose parents work in Austria PDF (50 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(19 KB)
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts PDF (104 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Clearing the Danube of sunken ships PDF (97 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Reasonable grounds for suspicion of irregularities on the part of the Norwegian child protection authority ('Barnevernet') PDF (100 KB) DOC (28 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(28 KB)
Implementation of the German minimum wage law (MiLog) PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Major interpellations (1)

Breaches of the rights of children whose parents work in Austria PDF (48 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(19 KB)

Written declarations (2)

Written declaration on the continuation of broadcasting by the television channel PRO TV in Moldova

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(77 KB) DOC(35 KB)
Authors: Maria PETRE, Joseph DAUL, Tunne KELAM, Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN, Marian-Jean MARINESCU

Amendments (223)

Amendment 38 #

2018/0233(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The Fiscalis 2020 programme offers Member States a Union framework within which to develop those cooperation activities, and which is more cost-effective than if each Member State were to set up individual cooperation frameworks on a bilateral or multilateral basis, whether among themselves or with third countries with which the EU cooperates closely in the field of taxation. It is therefore appropriate to ensure the continuation of that programme by establishing a new programme in the same area, the Fiscalis programme ('the Programme').
2018/10/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2018/0233(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Considering the importance of globalisation, the Programme should continue to provide the possibility of involving external experts within the meaning of Article 238 of the Financial Regulation. Those external experts should mainly be representatives of governmental authorities, including from non- associated third countries, as well as representatives of international organisations, economic operators, taxpayers and civil society.
2018/10/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2018/0233(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 201623 , there is a need to evaluate this programme on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on Member States, thereby also taking into consideration REFIT. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Instrument on the ground. Annual reports should be presented showing the status quo, measuring performance of the efficiency of the programme, combining the efforts of all participants. _________________ 23 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-making of 13 April 2016; OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1-14.
2018/10/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #

2018/0233(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Wherever beneficial for the achievement of the actions implementing the objectives referred to in Article 3, representatives of governmental authorities, including those from third countries not associated to the programme pursuant to Article 5, representatives of international and other relevant organisations, of economic operators and organisations representing economic operators and of civil society may take part as external experts toas well as external experts, may take part in actions organised under the Programme.
2018/10/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the independence of the Commission in itsand national competition authorities in their mission of shaping and enforcing the EU competition rules for the benefit of EU consumers;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 53 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note that EU rules do not establish target time frames for antitrust investigationmerger cases as is the case for formal merger review deadlines and the common practice of many national competition authorities; notes that this implies that decisions are sometimes made too late, after competitors have been obliged to exit the market;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 57 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to adopt guidelines to limit the duration of antitrust investigations, in order to avoid uncertainty or excessive burden for businesses and shape a competitive landscape which is not detrimental to consumers; longer and more flexible timeframes should only be allowed in complex cases where investigations are to be extended with regard to other undertakings;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that while the speed of investigations has to be balanced with the need to adequately preserve the rights of defence, clearas well as quality of investigations, time frames wouldmay help the antitrust authorities to make more efficient use of their resources;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 84 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that the Commission should verify that national competition authorities (NCAs) are sufficientadequately equipped in terms of financial and human, human and technical resources to guarantee their independence, autonomy, efficiency and effectiveness, and that it should submit an annual report to Parliament regarding thisese key points;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 104 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates that all market players should pay their fair share of tax and the state aid rules apply tax exemptions just as much as to any other type of aid; welcomes the Commission’s in-depth investigations into anti-competitive practices such as selective tax advantages and excess profit ruling systems; stresses that the reduction of tax fraud and tax avoidance is fundamental in order to consolidate sound public budgets;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to promote convergence of competition policy instruments and practices across jurisdiction as well as protecting the global level playing field through free trade agreements;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the Commission decision taken against Luxembourg on the illegal tax benefits granted to Amazon (around EUR 250 million);deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that the bailout of Veneto Banca and Banca Popolare di Vicenza was based on the assumption that these were systemic banks in their region, and calls on the Commission to develop this line of thinking in compliance with EU rules and the bail-in principle;deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 149 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that the financial crisis has increased concentration in the banking sector and calls on the Commission to carry out a region-by- region study at European level to examine this phenomenon and its effects on competition;deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 184 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that, without full-blown structural separation between Google’s general and specialised search services,Is of the opinion that an auction- based approach cannot deliver equal treatment, since in the context of an auction, Google’s proposed functional separation would simply transfer profit from one Google business unit to another;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 202 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Encourages the Commission to ensuredevelop policy and enforcement instruments dealing with the emergence of digital economies, ensuring that it has a full complement of high-tech engineers and specialists in cutting-edge technologies available to resolve specific digital economy cases;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 210 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Welcomes the EUR 880 million fine imposed by the Commission on Scania for participating in a trucks cartel;deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 219 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Asks the Commission to apply State aid rules strictly and uniformly to European airlines such as Alitalia and Air Berlin; believes that restructuring aid is one of the most distortive forms and that the same rules should be applied to national and low-cost carriers;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 230 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the revision of Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 on safeguarding fair competition, aimed at ensuring reciprocity and eliminating unfair practices, including through alleged State aid to airlines from certain third countries; believes that transparency in the fair competition clause is an essential element to guarantee a level playing field; and that this Regulation or other appropriate legislative initiative should prevent anticompetitive behaviour in ticket distribution, such as the imposition by certain airlines of surcharges or restricted access to information for those using booking channels other than their own;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 239 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that, in line with the current Commission Guidelines, all airports financed by the EU budget should be based on a positive cost-benefit analysis to avoid the financing of ghost airports in Europe; calls on the Commission to come up with a public list of such potential ghost airports;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Stresses the importance of safeguarding the transparency of flight information, ensuring a level playing field in the market and ultimately protecting European consumers ability to make informed choices and therefore calls on the European Commission to abide by these principles when reviewing the Code of Conduct on CRS and the Air Services regulation;
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 255 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission to assess whether the imposition of specific hubs, based on the 1 000-plus bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries, is detrimental to competition and consumers’ interests;deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 260 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Invites the Commission to look at the bilateral aviation agreement between Spain and Russia which obliges all flights going through Siberia to depart from or land at the Madrid hub airport, giving an unfair advantage to the Iberia national carrier;deleted
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 277 #

2017/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. It acknowledges the importance of having an interoperable European Electronic Toll Service for the scope of fostering mobility and consumer welfare within the EU. However, it pays a special attention to competition taking place in the sector as undertakings present on the market should benefit from a level playing field that is to be fostered by both: legislators and awarding authorities. In this resort, it follows with interest the recast of Directive 2004/53/EC and Decision 2009/750/EC on the interoperability of European electronic
2017/11/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #

2017/0134(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. Before the end of September of each year, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat), in the context of national accounting procedures, with figures for aggregate GNI and its components, in accordance with the definitions referred to in Article 1. Totals for GDP and its components mayshall be presented in accordance with the three approaches referred to in Article 1(2). The figuresData provided shall covebe transmitted for the preceding year and any changes made to the figures fordata for the previous years shall be communicated at the same time.
2017/11/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #

2016/2006(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas the ISA are developed by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent body hosted by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC); whereas the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) is an international independent organisation that oversees the process leading to the adoption of the ISA and the IFAC's other public interest activities;
2016/03/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2016/2006(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is encouraging Member States to follow the ESMA enforcement guidelines on IFRSguidelines on the enforcement of financial information; calls on the Commission to assess whether ESMA’s powers make it possible to ensure consistent and coherent enforcement across the EU;
2016/03/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2016/0110(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) EFRAG's field of activity is currently limited to that which is described in the special advisor's report and, considering that multiple additional tasks and responsibilities that have been attributed to EFRAG in the European Parliament's resolution of 7 June 2016, EFRAG should ensure that those additional tasks and responsibilities are to be actively monitored and reported upon.
2016/09/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 348 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(A) – paragraph 2 – indent 1
- Cadmium (Cd) 1,580 mg/kg dry matter,P2O5
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 392 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(B) – paragraph 3 – point a – point 2 – indent 1
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date of application of this Regulation]: 680 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 404 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(B) – paragraph 3 – point a – point 2 – indent 2
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring three years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 40 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), andeleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 478 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 1
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date of application of this Regulation]: 680 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 489 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 2
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring three years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 40 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), andeleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 502 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 3
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring twelve years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 20 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),deleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 366 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – pragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
(c) remuneration, including overtime ratesminimum rates of pay, including overtime rates, unless the Member State fails to publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of minimum rates of pay, their geographic and personal scope and the method of calculation; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes;
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 400 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
For the purposes of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitthe concept of minimum rates of pay referred to in paragraph 1 (c) is defined by the national law and/or praction awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, ince of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 428 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remunerminimum rates of pay, their geographic and personal scope and the method of calculation in accordance with point (c).
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 438 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
If the payment received by the posted worker is at least equal to the minimum rates of pay, it shall be deemed that this posted worker has received the minimum rates of pay provided for in this Directive.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 452 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – pragraph 1 a
(b) The following paragraph is added: 1a. territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration,, the Member State may, on a non– discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory.deleted If undertakings established in the
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 469 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a b (new)
(ba) The following paragraph is added: 1ab. Member States shall publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration, their geographic and personal scope and the method of calculation in accordance with point (d). If the payment received by the posted worker is at least equal to the amount of constituent elements of remuneration, it shall be deemed that this posted worker has received the remuneration provided for in this Directive.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2344(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas keeping the Balance of Payments Facility for non-euroArticle 123 and 125 TFEU were put in place to avoid and prevent moral hazard and ensure fiscal sustainability and prudency of euro area Member States; while depriving euro area Member States of this instrument as a consequence of the no-bail-out clause reflects one of the original flaws of EMUereas the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) constitutes the crisis resolution mechanism for countries of the euro area and has the function of a shock absorbent; whereas non-euro area Member States are not covered by the ESM but by the Balance of Payment Facility which supports non- euro countries in difficulties or when seriously threatened with difficulties as regards its balance of payments, as laid down in Article 143 TFEU, as non-euro countries experience higher risks due to exchange rate fluctuations;
2016/06/09
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 807 #

2015/2344(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Considers that those non-euro countries that do not have an opt-out will eventually become part of the EMU and therefore may join the governance framework on a voluntary basis with a special statuEmphasizes that the seven EU Member States that do not have an opt-out or opt-in from joining the common currency, but are bound to join the euro area by their Treaties of Accession to the European Union, should have full rights of participating in the governance structure of any fiscal capacity, be able to contribute and benefit financially, receive technical and financial assistance in transposing needed structural reforms in their countries, thereby making their economies more competitive especially vis-à-vis current euro area Member States, increasing resilience, thus ensuring the sound transition into the euro area and avoid economic and financial crises in the future by fostering a stronger euro area with stronger Member States;
2016/06/09
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 304 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The EFSI shall avoid a high exposure with a given sector or geographic area.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 450 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) For Member States where financial markets are less developed, appropriate technical assistance should be provided. The EIAH should encourage those Member States to set up National Investment Advisory Hub.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 736 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The EFSI shall avoid a high exposure within a given sector or geographic area. For Member States where financial markets are less developed, appropriate technical assistance should be provided. The EIAH should encourage those Member States to set up National Investment Advisory Hub.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 6 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 40 a (new)
- having regard to the Accounting Standards on taxation, namely IAS 12,
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 37 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the German, France and Italian Ministers of Finance sent a letter to the Commissioner Pierre Moscovici asking to draft a legislation to deal with tax avoidance and aggressive planning against the base erosion and profit shifting;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the agreement on the Automatic Exchange of Information and the prospects for a swift implementation thereof; calls for tax agreements to be concluded also with third countries before 31 December 20145;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that increased tax policy coordination and harmonisation would ensure that Member States’ tax policies support wider EU policy objectives as set out in the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 91 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to put forward concrete proposals to tackle the VAT gap, taking into account the recent proposals as adopted by the Council, and to evaluate proposals on a definite VAT system by Spring 2015;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note of the joint statement of 6 May 2014 by 10 MSs on enhanced cooperation on the FTT and the progress of its implementation; calls on participating MSs to reach an agreement including derivative transactions by the end of 2014, without due delay;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 114 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on MSs to agree to a compulsorythe CCCTB as a comprehensive and long-term solution to tackle company tax obstacles in the Single Market; Notes that its legislative resolution of 19 April 2012 on the proposal for a Council Directive on a common consolidated corporate tax base shall serve as a basis for a reasonable compromise;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Awaits the Commission’s follow-up on its two recommendations on ‘measures intended to encourage third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters’ and ’aggressive tax planning’ and the MSs’ follow-up on the updated Commission Action Plan against tax fraud and tax evasion and aggressive tax planning;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 148 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. The Commission should update the Action Plan against the tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning based on the pledges of the G20 leaders ensuring the fairness of the international tax system and secure countries' revenue basis; the Fiscalis and Custom Programmes should also focus on the issue of aggressive tax planning;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 176 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. RegretsIs concerned that national reforms in the public sectorsome member States have resulted in inadequate staffing and resource allocation to national tax administrations and tax audit authorities;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to propose, and on MSs to agree on, a common EU position and a set of criteria for the definition of tax havens; recalls the call for appropriate measures, including a public European blacklist of tax havens, by 31 DecemberMarch 20145;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 199 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for authorities to suspend or revoke the banking licences of financial institutions if they have been proven to assist in tax fraud;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls upon the Commission to intensify its use of EU state aid rules against aggressive tax planning; the Commission should investigate all tax ruling cases if this are not breaking the EU state aid rules, through selective tax benefits for some companies;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 221 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls open to all member states to implement the agreement on automatic exchange of information of aggressive tax planning arrangements;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 225 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Calls on the Commission to draft a directive against to set a general principle of effective taxation to prevent BEPS by the end of June 2015;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 241 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that the quantitative measurement of macroeconomic targets should be accompanied by qualitative indicators (social and environmental, for example), in order to address long-term goals; calls on the Commission, when drafting the country-specific recommendations, to carry out an in- depth study of the MSs’ differencean in-depth study of the MSs' differences, in order to address long-term goals;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 260 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Urges MSs, when introducing property taxes, to ensure the fundamental right of accommodation, by protecting the principal house of each taxpayer;at all relevant side effects are taken into account.
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 271 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Requests that reforming taxbudget expenditures should not result in an unjustified decrease in public expendituresbe reformed in a way which is friendly towards creation of the job growth, which in turn will generate additional tax income;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 287 #

2014/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the fact that MSs' taxation policy on environmental taxes should be aligned with the EU 2030 strategy; recognisnotes that an increase in environmental taxes has the potential to generate revenues and jobs; calls on the Commission to come forward with appropriate legislative proposals, if deemed appropriate;
2014/12/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2013/2175(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need to ensure thatan efficient and effective long- term financing benefits not onlyframework, by creating the right instruments and mechanisms beneficial to investors and, shareholders, but also workers, undertakings and consumers; to this aim, the European Union should increasingly focus on development banks - privately and state owned - as part of the economic recovery strategy;
2013/11/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2013/2175(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that an efficient and effective framework for long-term financing needs to be achieved through a convergent approach between European and national policies; to this aim, the EIB should support development banks, with a view to unlocking liquidity for SMEs, and creating the right conditions for increasing production and consequently raising employment;
2013/11/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2013/2021(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the loss of prudence in accounting standards as a consequence of the adoption of international financial reporting standards played and continues to play a central role in allowing banks to give a view of their accounts that was and is not always true and fair with particular reference to IAS 39 on loan loss provisioning;
2013/04/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 167 #

2013/2021(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the HLEG did not look at the issue of accounting standards and their role in financial crisis in sufficient depth; notes that European company law requires that accounts must be true and fair in order for directors of a company to discharge their liabilities to creditors and shareholders of companies; suggests that as a consequence of international financial reporting standards being overly complex and being principally about providing information to the share trading part of capital markets, these standards did and do not give a true and fair view of banks' accounts; notes that despite commitments from the IASB to update IAS 39 on loan loss provisioning from an incurred to expected loss model, its adoption has been delayed due to concerns expressed by FASB that the revised IASB model is still not a lifetime expected loss model; notes that although moving to an expected loss model recognises the problems caused by IAS 39 during the crisis, the added complexity may well create problems of their own; argues that, therefore, structural reform must include a thorough assessment of what role accounts should play in driving better governance of banks;
2013/04/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 449 #

2013/2021(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Urges the Commission to conduct a study to ensure that accounting standards used by financial institutions give a genuinely true and fair view of banks' financial health; points out that accounts are the main source of information for an investor to understand whether or not a company is a going concern or not; notes that auditors can only sign off accounts if they are true and fair, independent of the financial standards used by preparers of financial statements; believes that if auditors are unsure that a company is a going concern they should not sign off the company's accounts, even if they have been drawn up in line with accounting standards; this should however be a driver of better management of the company in question; suggests that international financial reporting standards do not necessarily give a true and fair view of accounts, as shown by numerous examples of banks collapsing despite their accounts having been signed off by auditors;
2013/04/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 95 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. This Directive shall also apply to a combination formed by new medium combustion plants according to Article 3a, including where the total rated thermal input of such combination is equal to or more than 50 MW, unless this combination is a combustion plant covered by Chapter III of Directive 2010/75/EU.
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) combustion plants which are covered by Chapter III, Chapter IV or Chapter IV of Directive 2010/75/EU;
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) combustion plants in which the gaseous products of combustion are used for the direct heating, drying or any other treatment of objects or materials, or direct gas fired heating;
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point f c (new)
(f c) vehicle engine test benches;
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ’existing combustion plant’ means a combustion plant put into operation before [12 years after the date of transposition] or for which a permit was granted before [2 years after the date of transposition] pursuant to national legislation provided that the plant is put into operation no later than [3 years after date of transposition];
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 164 #

2013/0442(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a Aggregation rules 1. The combination formed by two or more new medium combustion plants may be considered as a single medium combustion plant for the purpose of this Directive and their rated thermal input added for the purpose of calculating the total rated thermal input of the plant, where: - the waste gases of such medium combustion plants are discharged through a common stack; or - taking into account technical and economic factors, the waste gases of such medium combustion plants could be discharged through a common stack. 2. For the purpose of calculating the total rated thermal input of a combination of two or more combustion plants, individual combustion plants with a rated thermal input below 1 MW shall not be considered.
2015/03/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 278 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. No action, proposal or policy of the Board, the Commission or a national resolution authority shall discriminate against entities referred to in Article 2credit institutions, deposit holders, investors or other creditors established in the Union on grounds of their nationality or place of business.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 293 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the need to avoid a negative impact for other parts of a group of which an entity referred to in Article 2 credit institution, which is subject to a resolution, is a member;
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 298 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e (a) (new)
(ea) the interest of the internal market as a whole
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 306 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. No decision of the Board or the Commission shall require Member States to provide extraordinary public financial support, unless a Member State has, according to its national budgetary procedures, approved the provision of the support. Member shall have a procedure in place which leads to a decision on the approval within [2 days] after the Board or the Commission has requested the approval.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 354 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Notwithstanding this provision, the national resolution authorities of non- participating Member States may draw up and maintain resolution plans for subsidiaries that are part of a group established in a participating Member State in accordance with Articles 11 and 12 of Directive [ ].
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 367 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. When drafting resolution plans in accordance with Article 7, the Board, after consultation with the competent authorityies, including the ECB, and the resolution authorities of non-participating Member States in which subsidiaries and significant branches are located insofar as is relevant to the significant branch, shall conduct an assessment of the extent to which institutions and groups are resolvable without the assumption of extraordinary public financial support besides the use of the Fund established in accordance with Article 64.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 825 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Where relevant, the Board may also call additional observers to participate in the meetings of its executive session, in particular national resolution authorities of non-participating Member States when deliberating on a group that has subsidiaries or significant branches in those non-participating Member States.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 835 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3
3. When necessary, because of urgency, the Board, in its executive session may take certain provisional decisions on behalf of the Board in its plenary session, in particular on administrative management matters, including budgetary matters.deleted
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 837 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4
4. The Board, in its executive session, shall meet on the initiative of the Executive Director or at the request of any of its members.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 860 #

2013/0253(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Meetings of the Board in its executive session shall be convened by the Executive Director on his own initiative or upon request of twoany of its members, and shall be chaired by the Executive Director. The Board may invite observers to attend its executive sessions on an ad hoc basis.
2013/10/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Improving access to financing for SMEs, including SMEs from the Union investing in the regions covered by this Decision, can play an essential role in stimulating economic development and in combating unemployment. In order to effectively reach out to SMEs, the EIB should cooperate with local financial intermediary institutions in the eligible countries, in particular to ensure that part of the financial benefits is passed on to their clients and provide added value compared to other sources of finance.It should be ensured that the EIB also cooperates with local financial intermediaries whose aims accord with those referred to in Recital 18 of this decision and Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union. The EIB should require intermediaries to report on the project financed and the SMEs supported.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) Within the areas covered by the general objectives, regional integration among countries, in particular economic integration between Pre-accession countries, Neighbourhood countries and the Union, should be an underlying objective for EIB financing operations. Within the aforementioned areas, the EIB should be able to support partner countries through foreign direct investments by companies from the Union that contribute to promoting technology and knowledge transfer, providing that due consideration has been made during the investment projects' due diligence to minimise the risks that EIB financing operations lead to negative repercussions on employment in the Union. The EIB should also be encouraged to support foreign direct investment in partner countries by companies from the Union at its own risk.Care should also be taken to ensure that the foreign direct investment by businesses based in the Union which is supported by the EIB genuinely contributes to economic integration between pre-accession countries, neighbourhood countries and the Union. The EIB should therefore indicate in what form it is specifically supporting businesses and how the businesses are using this support.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 39 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 22
(22) In its financing operations outside the Union that fall within the scope of this Decision, the EIB should endeavour further to enhance coordination and cooperation with European Financial Institutions and International Financial Institutions, notably those participating in the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation. This cooperation includes, where appropriate, cooperation on sector conditionality and mutual reliance on procedures, use of joint co-financing and participation in global initiatives, such as those promoting aid coordination and effectiveness. Such coordination and cooperation should strive to minimise possible duplication of costs and unnecessary overlap. Particularly with reference to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), greater efforts should be made by both Banks to find additional scope for synergies. The tripartite Memorandum of Understanding between the Commission, the EIB Group and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in respect of cooperation outside the Union, which allows the EIB Group and the EBRD to act in a complementary way by relying on their respective comparative advantages, was updated in 2012 to cover the extension of EBRD's geographical scope to the Mediterranean region and should continue to be applied. The principles set out in this Decision should also be applied when EIB financing is implemented through cooperation agreements with other European Financial Institutions and International Financial Institutions.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
(25) The EIB financing operations in support of Union external policies should continue to be conducted in accordance with the principles of sound banking practiceand sustainable banking practices, with a long-term future, which are geared to the real economy. They should continue to be managed in accordance with the EIB's own rules and procedures, including appropriate control measures and compliance with the EIB's statement on social and environmental standards, as well as with the relevant rules and procedures concerning the Court of Auditors and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). In its financing operations the EIB should adequately implement its policies towards weakly regulated or non-cooperative jurisdictions in order to contribute to the international fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and money-laundering. Particularly in the case of financing via local financial intermediaries, it should therefore be ensured that the financing made available by the intermediaries avoids the risk of fraud and corruption in so far as possible. In the interests of transparency and in order to avoid fraud and corruption, the EIB should draw up, in cooperation with the local financial intermediaries, a list of the final borrowers.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. EIB financing operations supporting the objectives provided for in paragraph 1(a) may include support to investment projects by SMEs from the Union. However, it should be ensured that EIB financing is genuinely used in the specific investment projects for the benefit of the SMEs concerned and not channelled to other areas as concealed support for undertakings. In order to ensure that funding is used as intended, the EIB shall draw up practical reporting standards to be complied with by borrowers.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) all EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision, in particular indicating whether an investment project is covered by the EU guarantee; – a description or summary of the project, – a description or summary of ex-post evaluation reports.
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #

2013/0152(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 2 – point B – point 2 – paragraph 2
Southern Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia
2013/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2013/0045(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
-
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal
2013/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #

2013/0045(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) The imposition of a tax on financial transactions would significantly reduce the liquidity of financial instruments subject to the tax and thereby increase the cost of funding for companies, pension funds, sovereigns and other economic agents. For a number of Member States currently experiencing difficulties in their financing of public activities and servicing their sovereign debt, the tax on financial transactions would be even more cumbersome.
2013/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2013/0045(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) The tax introduced through this directive must not be levied on entities established outside the territory of the participating Member.
2013/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 131 #

2013/0045(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) it is party, acting either for its own account or for the account of another person, or is acting in the name of a party to the transaction, to a financial transaction in a structured product or one of the financial instruments referred to in Section C of Annex I of Directive 2004/39/EC issued within the territory of that Member State, with the exception of instruments referred to in points (4) to (10) of that Section which are not traded on an organised platform.deleted
2013/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #

2012/2151(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AT
AT. whereas European supervision of financial institutions within the euro area is an absolute priority to take measures to tackle the crisis, it should be, however, ensured that, for the purpose of internal financial market stability, countries whose currency is not the euro, which decide to access the single supervision mechanism, should be granted a participation formula, which guarantees symmetric relations between accepted obligations and impact on decision-making;
2012/09/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 277 #

2012/2151(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AT a (new)
ATa. whereas the consequences of the establishment of a euro area supervisory authority on non-euro area Member States should be taken into account;
2012/09/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 14 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) As well as playing a central role in ensuring investors are equipped with important information relating to the balance sheet, profit and loss statement and cash flows, accounts represent a major element of the corporate governance framework, as laid out in Article 15 of the Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC of 13 December 1976, which requires that directors can only make distributions out of unqualified accounts for which the paramount requirement is that they give a true and fair view, or where the accounts are qualified they give a true and fair view subject to matters not material to the lawfulness of a distribution. Directors and auditors can only sign off accounts which give a true and fair view of a company's finances, which is an objectively measurable standard.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) It is important to recognise the fundamental differences between the US and EU accounting traditions. The former rules-based system, introduced in 1933, is based on the narrower view that accounts are only about providing timely and reliable information about a company's finances to the capital markets. The latter principles-based system not only has this requirement but also plays a much more central role in ensuring directors do not sign off accounts illegally. It should be noted that there has never been a requirement for accounts to be true and fair in US GAAP and such a requirement is nowhere present in the IASB's Conceptual Framework, despite this being the overriding principle of European accounting law. Although it is clear that attempts have been made by the IASB to introduce a principles-based system, there is some disagreement as to whether convergence with a legally different system is possible or desired.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 16 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) As well as accounts playing vital roles in protecting shareholder and creditor interests, they form the bedrock of prudential regulation in the sense that all major financial services initiatives rely on companies' accounts, including CRD IV, EMIR and many others. Regulators rely on accounting terminology to understand what risks a company is taking and therefore what is required of that company.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In a global economy, there is a need for a global accounting language, while taking into account the many different accounting traditions and languages already used. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are adopted and used in many jurisdictions around the world, although it must be noted that there are no processes currently in place to ensure that IFRS have been fully implemented in those jurisdictions. Such international accounting standards need to be developed under a transparent and democratically accountable process. To ensure that the interests of the Union are respected and that global standards are of high quality and compatible with Union law, it is essentivital that the interests of the Union are adequately taken into account in that international standard-setting processIASB accepts the central idea at the heart of European accounting, which is the requirement for accounts to be prepared on a prudent basis and to be true and fair for all the functions required of accounts by Union law.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) According to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards, IFRS should only be incorporated into Union law to be applied by companies with securities listed on a regulated market in the Union, provided that the IFRS meet the criteria set out in that regulation and the requirements of the fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 and the seventh Council Directive 83-3497EEC of 13 June 1983. IFRS therefore play a major role in the functioning of the internal market and thus the Union has a direct interest in ensuring that the process through which IFRS are developed and approved delivers standards that are consistent with the requirements of the legal framework of the internal market. It should be noted that the IAS Regulation 2002 uses the conceptual framework from 2001 which has now been changed in several significant manners, particularly around the word 'prudence', which includes not booking unrealised profits, and stewardship, which includes the capital maintenance function of accounts.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) IFRS are issued by the IASB and related interpretations are issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee, two bodies within the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation. It is therefore important to establish appropriate funding arrangements for the IFRS Foundation. These funding arrangements will be reliant on the IASB achieving certain milestones in terms of updating its own governance and specific standards and also overhauling its Conceptual Framework to ensure it properly reflects Union company law requirements.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 23 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) was founded in 2001 by European organisations representing issuers, investors and the accountancy profession involved in the financial reporting process. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002, EFRAG provides the Commission with opinions on whether an accounting standard issued by the IASB or an interpretation issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee, which is to be endorsed, complies with the endorsement criteria set out in that Regulation. EFRAG is also taking up the role of the ‘single European accounting voice’ in the global arena. In that capacity, EFRAG provides input to the IASB's standard-setting process.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) There are also calls for EFRAG to take up the role of the 'single European accounting voice'. It must be clearly understood whether there is appetite for such a role from national standard-setters and regulators, given the significant differences of opinion that already exist between Member States. If this role is given to EFRAG, all interactions with the IASB must be made fully transparent and any decisions taken by EFRAG should be made in full consultation with national standard-setters.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Taking into account EFRAG's keysingle role in supporting internal market law and policy and in repensuring that IFRS are compliant with the requiresmenting European interests in the standard-setting process at international levels of Union company law and policy, as laid out in the IAS Regulation 2002, it is necessary for the Union to ensure EFRAG's stable financing and thus contribute to its funding. Such financing arrangements should be reassessed in the light of any decision taken to give EFRAG more responsibilities in terms of influencing the IASB in addition to fulfilling the basic task required by the IAS Regulation 2002.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 29 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Bodies working in the field of accounting and auditing are highly dependent on funding and play major roles in the Union which are decisive for the functioning of the internal market. The proposed beneficiaries of the Programme established by Decision No 716/2009/EC have been co-financed by operating grants from the Union budget, which has allowed them to increase their financial independence from private-sector and ad- hoc fundingsources, thereby raising their capacity and credibility. Public funding in itself however should not be seen as having confirmed this independence from the private sector. In particular, greater transparency around membership of the IASB's and EFRAG's board and other committees should be required to ensure all stakeholders are represented in the endorsement process. All employees of EFRAG and IASB should be required to declare other relevant financial or job interests or commitments.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 32 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Experience has shown that Union co- financing ensures that beneficiaries benefit from clear, stable, diversified, sound and adequate funding and it contributes to enabling the beneficiaries to accomplish their public interest mission in an independent and efficient manner. Therefore, sufficient funding should continue to be provided by means of a Union contribution towards the functioning of international accounting and auditing standard-setting, and in particular to the IFRS Foundation, EFRAG and the PIOB, subject to certain milestones being achieved in terms of updating the conceptual framework of the IFRS Foundation and clarifying what roles EFRAG and PIOB play.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The co-financing programme to be established by this Regulation is expected to contribute to the objectives of ensuring comparability and transparency of company accounts throughout the EU, to the global harmonization of financial reporting standards by promoting the international acceptance of IFRS and to promoting convergence and high quality international standards for auditing in all Member States. This programme also contributes to the Europe 2020 strategy by reinforcing the single market of financial services and capital, and contributes to the strategy's external dimension as well. The co-financing programme should not be used to encourage the adoption of or market IFRS in third countries.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) This Regulation should provide for the possibility of co-financing activities of certain bodies pursuing an objective forming part of and supporting the Union policy in the field of designing standards, endorsing standards or supervising standard-setting processes related to financial reporting and auditing. This financing should only be given to the bodies in question if it is clear that European accounting concepts, in particular around prudence and the requirement for a true and fair view, are embedded at the core of their conceptual frameworks or structures.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) In order to promote the Union's interests in the fields of financial reporting and auditing and flexibly adapt to eventual governance and institutional changes in those fields, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of selecting new beneficiaries for the Programme. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, national standard-setters and the European Parliament. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) A review must be carried out within six months of the adoption of this Regulation to identify whether or not existing IFRSs and in particular the IASB's conceptual framework fulfil the requirements of Union company law. In this review, the Commission should explore the possibility of introducing tougher liability standards for directors and auditors and also to introduce a legally binding true and fair override, that if the accounts prepared in accordance with IFRS do not give a true and fair view, the accounts cannot be signed off. The review must also ensure existing governance arrangements in EFRAG and IASB are overhauled to ensure all private sector interests and commitments are made fully public.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Programme covers the activities of developing or providing input to the development of standards, applying, assthe IASB, which develops IFRS, EFRAG, which assesses whether or not an IFRS is compliant with Union company law as part of the implementation of Union policiess ing or monitoring standards or oversee the field of financial reporting standard-setting processes in suppo auditing and PIOB, which assesses whether or not an ISA is compliant with Union company law as part of the implementation of Union policies in the field of financial reporting and auditing.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The objective of the Programme is to improve the conditions for the functioning of the internal market, the ability for regulators to enforce prudential regulation and to strengthen corporate governance by supporting transparent and independent development of international financial reporting and auditing standards.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This objective will be measured in particular through the number of countries using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and International Standards on Auditing (ISA).deleted
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9 to select new beneficiaries for the Programme and to amend paragraph 1 accordingly.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Any new beneficiary shall be a non- profit making legal person pursuing an objective forming part of and supporting the Union policy in the field of financial reporting and auditing and shall be a direct successor of one of the beneficiaries listed in paragraph 1.deleted
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Financing under the Programme shall be provided in the form of operating grants, renewed annually after the Commission has conducted an assessment of whether the beneficiaries have achieved the goals laid out in the Programme and subject to approval from the European Parliament.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2012/0364(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The financial envelope for the implementation of this Regulation over the period 2014-2020 shall be EUR 58 010 000 in current prices, although this figure can be reduced or adjusted if it is found that the beneficiaries have not achieved certain milestones.
2013/06/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 165 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 2 – point 11
11. 'lLow indirect land-use change-risk biofuels' means biofuels, the feedstocks of which are not listed in Part A of Annex V, or are listed in Part A of Annex V, but were produced within schemes which offset indirect land use change emissions resulting from actions that reduce the demand for agricultural land and/or increase the efficiency of agro-forestry product chains or which reduce the displacement of production for purposes other than for making biofuels and which were produced in accordance with the sustainability criteria for biofuels laid down in Article 7b. Only the amount of feedstock which corresponds to the actual reduction in displacement achieved through the scheme may be considered. Such schemes may either operate as individual projects at a local level or as policy measures covering partly or entirely the territory of a Member State or a third country. Displacement of production for purposes other than for making biofuels can be reduced if the scheme achieves productivity increases within the area it covers beyond levels which would have prevailed in the absence of such productivity-promoting schemes;
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 215 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Article 2 – point 1
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point v
(v) 'lLow indirect land-use change-risk biofuels and bioliquids' means biofuels and bioliquids, the feedstocks of which are not listed in pPart A of Annex VIII, or are listed in pPart A of Annex VIII, but were produced within schemes which offset indirect land use change emissions resulting from actions that reduce the demand for agricultural land and/or increase the efficiency of agro-forestry product chains or which reduce the displacement of production for purposes other than for making biofuels and bioliquids and which were produced in accordance with the sustainability criteria for biofuels and bioliquids laid down in Article 17. Only the amount of feedstock which corresponds to the actual reduction in displacement achieved through the scheme may be considered. Such schemes may either operate as individual projects at a local level or as policy measures covering partly or entirely the territory of a Member State or a third country. Displacement of production for purposes other than for making biofuels and bioliquids can be reduced if the scheme achieves productivity increases within the area it covers beyond levels which would have prevailed in the absence of such productivity-promoting schemes.;
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Article 2 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of compliance with the targets referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the maximum joint contribution from biofuels and bioliquids produced from cereal and other starch-rich crops, sugars and oil crops shall be no more than the energy quantity corresponding to the maximum contribution as set out in paragraph 4(d)., unless they are 'low indirect land use change risk biofuels and bioliquids'
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Article 2 – point 2 – point b – point iv
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) for the calculation of biofuels in the numerator, the share of energy from biofuels produced from cereal and other starch-rich crops, sugars and oil crops shall be no more than 7 % of the final consumption of energy in transport in the Member States in 2020;, unless they are 'low indirect land use change risk biofuels and bioliquids'.
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 263 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Article 2 – point 2 – point b – point iv
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point e
(e) Member States shall seek to achieve the objective of a minimum proportion of biofuels produced from feedstocks and other fuels, listed in part A of Annex IX, being consumed on their territory. To that effect, each Member State shall set a national targets, which it shall endeavour to achieve. A referencachieve by 2020 and endeavour to increase by 2030. The value for this target is 0,5 percentage points in absolute energy content of the share of energy from renewable sources in all forms of transport in 2020 referred to in the first subparagraph, to be met with biofuels produced from feedstocks and other fuels, listed in part A of Annex IX, and which shall be considered to be twice their energy content in accordance with point (f) of this subparagraph and part A of Annex IX. In addition, biofuels made from feedstocks not listed in Annex IX that were determined to be wastes, residues, non- food cellulosic material or ligno-cellulosic material by the competent national authorities and are used in existing installations prior to the adoption of Directive 2014/.../EU+ of the European Parliament and of the Council*, may be counted towards the national target. Member States may set a national target lower than the reference value of 0,5 percentage points, based on one or more of the following grounds: (i) objective factors such as the limited potential for the sustainable production of biofuels produced from feedstocks and other fuels, listed in part A of Annex IX, or the limited availability of such biofuels at cost efficient prices on the market, taking into account the assessment contained in the Commission report referred to in Article 3(1) of Directive 2014/…/EU. (ii) the specific technical or climatic characteristics of the national market for transport fuels, such as the composition and condition of the road vehicle fleet; or (iii) national policies allocating commensurate financial resources to incentivising the use of electricity from renewable energy sources in transport. The Commission shall publish: – the national targets of the Member States and, where applicable, the grounds for differentiation of their national target as compared to the reference value, notified in accordance with Article 4(2) of Directive 2014/…/EU+; – a synthesis report on Member States' achievements towards their national targets; __________________ +OJ: please insert the number of this Directive.
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 360 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Annex I – point 2
Directive 98/70/EC
Annex V – part B – point 2 a (new)
(2a) low indirect land use change risk biofuels and bioliquids.
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 377 #

2012/0288(COD)

Council position
Annex II – point 2
Directive 2009/28/EC
Annex VIII – part B – point 2 a (new)
(2a) low indirect land use change risk biofuels and bioliquids
2015/02/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to provide for the single supervisory mechanism, Council Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) Regulation] confers specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions in the Member States whose currency is the euro. Other Member States may enter in a close cooperation with the ECB. Under that Regulation, the ECB is to coordinate and express the position of those Member States on the decisions to be taken by the Board of Supervisors of the European Banking Authority (EBA) falling within the scope of the ECB tasks.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) Bearing in mind that the EBA, in works of which all Member States participate with equal rights, was established with an aim to develop the single rulebook and ensure the coherence of supervisory practices within the EU and given the establishment of the single supervisory mechanism with a leading role of the ECB, the EBA needs to be equipped with adequate instruments, which will enable it to efficiently perform its entrusted tasks concerning the integrity of the single market in the area of financial services.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In view of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB by Council Regulation (EU) No …/….../... [127(6) Regulation], EBA should be able to carry out its tasks also in relation to the ECB. In order to ensure that existing mechanisms for settlement of disagreements and actions in emergency situations remain effective, a specificcommon procedure, binding for all competent authorities, should be provided for. In particular, if the competent authority, including the ECB, does not comply with an action by EBA to settle a disagreement or to address an emergency situation, it should be required to explain its reasons. In that case, whenever based on requirements set out in directly applicable Union law EBA can adopt an individual decision addressed to the financial institution concerned, it should do so.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 123 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) The mandate of the EBA to settle disagreements, involving the ECB with regard to cases concerning prudential supervision, can be inferred from the fact that both the establishment of the EBA and the conferment of specific supervisory tasks on the ECB have been introduced through secondary law.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In order to ensure that interests of all Member States are adequately taken into account and to allow for the proper functioning of the EBA with a view to maintain and deepen the internal market in the field of financial services, the voting modalities within the Board of Supervisors should be adapted, in particularboth with regard to decisions taken by the EBA at simple majority and decisions taken at qualified majority.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Decisions concerning breaches of Union law and settlement of disagreements should be examined by an independent panel composed of voting members of the Board of Supervisors which do not have any conflicts of interest, appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The decisions proposed by the panel to the Board of Supervisors should be considered as adopted uonless rejected by a simple majority, which should include an adequate number of votes from members from Member Sy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at simple majority in two separate votings, one of which tatkes participating in the SSM and from Member States that do not participate in the SSMlace in the group of the Member States with common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 141 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The members of the independent panel set up according to Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 should not be considered to be in a situation of conflict of interest on the sole ground that they are, in particular, in cases when they representatives of the competent authoritiesy, which are part of the SSM and a given case to be decided upon by the Panel concerns the SSMhas jurisdiction within the Member State, in which the concerned credit institution operates. The EBA should develop rules of procedure for the panel that ensure its independence and objectivity.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 144 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Since the Member States which entered into close cooperation with the SSM are devoid of voting rights in the Governing Council of the ECB, which results in a lack of effective influence on the decision making process within the SSM, a special procedure for settlement of disagreements between the ECB and a competent authority of a Member State which has entered into close cooperation shall be established, which will compensate for the absence of forceful instruments to sway the decision making process taken within the SSM and at the same time, will safeguard the right to protect justified interests, in particular the stability of the local financial market. To that end, the EBA should be equipped with the ultimate authority to settle disagreements between the ECB and the competent authority of a Member State that has entered into close cooperation with the SSM.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 148 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The composition of the Management Board should be balanced and proper representation of Member States participating in the SSM, remaining in the close cooperation, and not participating in the SSM should be ensured.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 3a
"3a. Where the Authority requests the ECB as competent authority to take the necessary action in accordance with paragraph 3, the ECBcompetent authority shall comply with it or shall provide within 48 hours at the latest adequate justification to the Authority for its non-compliance."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 197 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 3a
"3a. Where the Authority requests the ECB as competent authority to take the necessaryspecific action or to refrain from action in accordance with paragraph 3, the ECBcompetent authority shall comply with it or shall provide within 48 hours at the latestwithin ten working days of the receipt of the request provide adequate justification to the Authority for its non-compliance."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 213 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 35 – paragraph 3
"3. Upon a duly justified request from a competent authority, the Authority mayshall provide any information that is necessary to enable the competent authority to carry out its duties, in accordance with the professional secrecy obligations laid down in sectoral legislation and in Article 70."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 222 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 41 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
"For the purposes of Article 17 and 19, the Board of Supervisors shall establish an independent panel consisting of the Chairperson and twofour members appointed by the Board of Supervisors among its voting members. At least onetwo members of the independent panel shall be from a Member State which is not a participating Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation]currency is not the euro, at least one of which shall be from a Member State not exercising close cooperation with the SSM either."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 226 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 41 – paragraph 4
"4. The Board of Supervisors shall adopt rules of procedure for the panel referred to in paragraph 2, including rules implementing the requirement set out in the second subparagraph of that paragraphBy way of derogation from paragraph 2, from the date when the euro is not the currency of only two Member States, the independent panel shall consist of a Chairperson and two members appointed by the Board of Supervisors, among its voting members. At least one member of such an independent panel shall be from a Member State in which currency is not the euro."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 230 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 42
6. In Article 42 the following paragraph is added: "The first and second paragraphs are without prejudice to the tasks conferred upon the ECB by Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation]."deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
"1. Decisions of the Board of Supervisors shall be taken by a simple majority of its memberin two separate votings, one of which takes place in the group of the Members States with common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 241 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
"With regard to the acts specified in Articles 10 to 16 and measures and decisions adopted under the third subparagraph of Article 9(5) and Chapter VI and by way of derogation from the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Board of Supervisors shall take decisions on the basis of a qualified majority of its members, as defined in Article 16(4) of the Treaty on European Union and in Article 3 of the Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions, however the decisions to be passed shall be supported in parallel by at least simple majority of weighted votes in the group Member States with common euro currency, as well as in the group of remaining Member States."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
"With regard to decisions in accordance with Articles 17, 19, and 19a, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted uonless it is rejected by a simple majority which shall include at least three votes from members of participating Member Sy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a simple majority in two separate votings, one of which tatkes and three votes from members ofplace in the group of the Members States which are neither participating Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/…[127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor have entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulationith common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
"By way of derogation from the third subparagraph, from the date when four or less Member States are neither participating Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor have entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulationthe euro is not the currency in only four Member States, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted uonless it is rejected byy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a simple majority which shall include at least one vote from members of those Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 252 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
"By way of derogation from the third subparagraph, from the date when the euro is not the currency in three or less Member States, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted, only if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a qualified majority of five- sixths of its members. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 253 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
"The independent panel, mentioned in Article 41, with regard to decisions in accordance with Articles 17, 19, and 19a takes the decision at a qualified majority of four-fifths of its members. From the date when the euro is not the currency in only two Member States, the independent panel takes decisions by simple majority."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 264 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
"The term of office of the members elected by the Board of Supervisors shall be 2 1/2 years. That term may be extended once. The composition of the Management Board shall be balanced and proportionate and shall reflect the Union as a whole. The Management Board shall include at least twohree representatives from Member States in which are not participating Member States in accordance with Regulation [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor havecurrency is not the euro, at least two of which come from the Member States, which did not entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that RegulationSSM either. Mandates shall be overlapping and an appropriate rotating arrangement shall apply."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 266 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 58 – paragraph 3
8 b. Article 58(3) is replaced by the following: "3. Two members of the Board of Appeal and two alternates shall be appointed by the Management Board of the Authority from a short-list proposed by the Commission, following a public call for expressions of interest published in the Official Journal of the European Union, and after consultation of the Board of Supervisors. At least one member and his alternate should come from a Member State which currency is not the euro, nor has entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulation. The other members shall be appointed in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 133 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) As a first step towards the banking union, a single supervisory mechanism should ensure that the Union's policy relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions is implemented in a coherent and effective way, that the single rulebook for financial services is applied equally to credit institutions in all Member States concerned, and that those credit institutions are subject to supervision of the highest quality, unfettered by other, non- prudential considerationsnotwithstanding the right of national authorities to address macro- prudential or systemic risk identified at the level of a Member State. In particular, the single supervisory mechanism should be consistent with the functioning of the internal market for financial services and with the free movement of capital. A single supervisory mechanism is the basis for the next steps towards the banking union. This reflects the principle that any introduction of common intervention mechanisms in relation to any participating Member States in case of crises should be preceded by common controls to reduce the likelihood that intervention mechanisms will have to be used.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 142 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) As the Eeuro area's central bank with extensiveaccess to multiple information resources, with widely recognised expertise and having macroeconomic and financial stability issueintained its credibility through the crisis, the ECB is well placed to carry out supervisory tasks with a focus on protecting the stability of Europe's financial system. Indeed in many Member States Central Banks are already responsible for banking supervision. The ECBSpecific tasks should therefore be conferred specific taskson the ECB concerning policies relating to the supervision of credit institutions within the Eeuro area.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 187 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Prior authorisation for taking up the business of credit institutions is a key prudential technique to ensure that only operators with a sound economic basis, an organisation capable of dealing with the specific risks inherent to deposit taking and credit provision, and suitable directors carry out those activities. The ECB should therefore have the task toa role in authoriseation of credit institutions and should be responsible forin the withdrawal of authorisations.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 207 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Compliance with Union rules requiring credit institutions to hold certain levels of capital against risks inherent to the business of credit institutions, to limit the size of exposures to individual counterparties, to publicly disclose information on a credit institutions' financial situation, to dispose of sufficient liquid assets to withstand situations of market stress, and to limit leverage is a prerequisite for credit institutions' prudential soundness. The ECB should have the task to ensure compliance with those rules and to set higher prudential requirements and apply additional measures to credit institutions in the cases specifically set out in Union acts.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Additional capital buffers, including a capital conservation buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer to ensure that credit institutions accumulate during periods of economic growth a sufficient capital base to absorb losses in stressed periods, are key prudential tools to ensure the availability of adequate loss absorbency. The ECB should have the task to impose such buffers and ensure credit institutions comply with them.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 214 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Additional capital buffers, including a capital conservation buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer to ensure that credit institutions accumulate during periods of economic growth a sufficient capital base to absorb losses in stressed periods, are key prudential tools to ensure the availability of adequate loss absorbency. The ECB should have the task to impose such buffers and ensure credit institutions comply with them.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 262 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to ensure consistency between supervisory responsibilities conferred on the ECB and decision making within the EBA, the ECB should coordinate a common position amongst representatives of the national authorities of the participating Member States in relation to matters falling within its competence.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 265 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to ensure consistency between supervisory responsibilities conferred on the ECB and decision making within the EBA, the ECB should coordinate a common position amongst representatives of the national authorities of the participating Member States in relation to matters falling within its competence.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 284 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) As regards the supervision of cross- border banks active both inside and outside the Euro area the ECB should cooperate closely with the competent authorities of non participating Member States. As a competent authority the ECB should be subject to the related obligations to cooperate and exchange information under Union law and should participate fully in the colleges of supervisors. In addition, since the exercise of supervisory tasks by a European institution brings about clear benefits in terms of financial stability and sustainable market integration, Member States not participating in the common currency should therefore also have the possibility to participate in the new mechanism. However, it is a necessary pre-condition for an effective exercise of supervisory tasks, that supervisory decisions are implemented fully and without delay. Member States wishing to participate in the new mechanism should therefore undertake to ensure that their national competent authorities will abide by and adopt any measure in relation to credit institutions requested by the ECB. The ECB should be able to establish a close cooperation with the competent authorities of a Member State not participating in the common currency. It should be obliged to establish the cooperation where the conditions set out in this regulation are met. The conditions under which representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States which established a close co-operation take part to the activities of the Supervisory Board should allow the greatest possible involvement of those represenensure equal treatment of all participating Member Statives taking into account the limits following from the Statute of ESCB and of the ECB, in particular as regards the integrity of its decision making process.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 320 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) The conferral of supervisory tasks implies a significant responsibility for the ECB to safeguard financial stability in the Union, and to use its supervisory powers in the most effective and proportionate way. The ECB should therefore be accountable for the exercise of these tasks towards the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers respectively the Eurogroup as democratically legitimised institutions representing the European people and the Member States. That should include regular reporting and responding to questions. Where national supervisors take action under this Regulation, accountability arrangements provided under national law should continue to apply.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 335 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) In particular, a supervisory board responsible for preparing decisions on supervisory matters should be set up with the ECB encompassing the specific expertise of national supervisors. The board should therefore be chaired by a Chair and a Vice-Chair elected by the ECB Governing Council and composed, in addition, of representatives from the ECB and from national authorities. In order to allow for an appropriate rotation while ensuring the full independence of the Chair and the Vice-Chair, their termbe composed of representatives from the ECB and national authorities from participating Member States. The board should be chaired by a Chair appointed by the supervisory board, on the basis of merit, skills, knowledge of financial institutions and markets, and of experience relevant to financial supervision and regulation, following an open selection procedure. The supervisory board should also elect, from among its members, the Vice-Chair who should carry out the functions of the Chairperson in his absence. The term of office of the Chair should not exceed five years and should be renewable once. The term of office of the Vice-Chair should not exceed five years and should not be renewable. In order to ensure full coordination with the activities of the EBA and with the prudential policies of the Union, the EBA and the European Commission should be observers in the supervisory board. The performance of the supervisory tasks conferred upon the ECB requires the adoption of a large number of technically complex acts and decisions, including decisions on individual credit institutions. In order to effectively carry out those tasks in accordance with the principle of separation from tasks relating to monetary policy, the ECB Governing Council of the ECB should be able to delegate certain clearly defined supervisory tasks and related decisions to the supervisory board, subject to the oversight and responsibility of the Governing Council, which can give instructions and directions to that body. The supervisory board may be supported by a steering committee with a more limited compositionWhen exercising its tasks, the supervisory board should take account of all relevant facts and circumstances in the participating Member States and should perform its duties in the interest of the Union as a whole. The national competent authorities of the participating Member States represented in the supervisory board should have equal voting rights.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 395 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) Whereas the pending financial crisis contributed immensely to the fragmentation of European financial markets, it is indispensable to enhance the common integrated financial framework. However, it should be borne in mind that the deepening of integration in the EMU cannot give rise to new, not outlined in the Treaties, convergence criteria, which can create additional barriers to entry for countries under a temporary derogation.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 396 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 b (new)
(47b) Whereas, efforts to secure financial stability within the EU require a diversified approach to distinctive types of risks in different markets and considering that the economies of the Member States, including those in the EMU, remain heterogeneous and that economic cycles are not synchronized, it should be borne in mind that according to the ESRB Recommendation (ESRB/2011/3) and standard no. 138 of Basel III, effective response to the problems of macroeconomic imbalances necessitates the use of discretionary instruments at local level. Moreover, the scope to customize macroprudential instruments is of the utmost significance to the Member States remaining in the EMU, due to their inability to use macroeconomic automatic stabilizers, such as interest rate or exchange rate.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 409 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation confers on the ECB specific tasks concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions, with a view to promoting the safety and soundness of credit institutions and the stability of the financial system within the EU and each Member State, with due regard for the unity and integrity of the internal market.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 412 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'participating Member State' means a Member State whose currency is the euro or a Member State whose currency is not the euro which has established a close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with Article 6;
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 413 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'participating Member State' means a Member State whose currency is the euro; or a Member State whose currency is not the euro, which has entered into a close cooperation in accordance with Article 6.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 422 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
(3a) The ECB shall co-operate closely with the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) or any other similar facility of a participating Member States whose currency is not the Euro where a credit institution has received or applied for financial assistance from that facility.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 468 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) only in the cases specifically set out in Union acts, to set higher prudential requirements and apply additional measures to credit institutions;deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 472 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) To impose capital buffers to be held by credit institutions in addition to own funds requirements referred to in (c), including setting countercyclical buffer rates and any other measures aimed at addressing systemic or macro-prudential risks in the cases specifically set out in Union acts;deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 474 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) To impose capital buffers to be held by credit institutions in addition to own funds requirements referred to in (c), including setting countercyclical buffer rates and any other measures aimed at addressing systemic or macro-prudential risks in the cases specifically set out in Union acts;deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 496 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) To carry out supervisory tasks in relation to early intervention where a credit institution does not meet or is likely to breach the applicable prudential requirements, including recovery plans and intra group financial support arrangements, in coordination with the relevant resolution authorities;
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 504 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) To coordinate and express a common position of representatives from competent authorities of the participating Member States when participating in the Board of Supervisors and the Management Board of the European Banking Authority, for issues relating to the tasks conferred on the ECB by this Regulation.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 525 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Subject to and in compliance with any relevant Union law rule and in particular any legislative and non-legislative act including technical standards developed by EBA and adopted by the Commission, the ECB may adopt regulations and recommendations and take decisions to implement or apply Union law, to the extent necessary to carry out the tasks conferred upon it by this Regulation, and only where those Union acts, do not deal with certain aspects necessary for the proper exercise of the ECB's tasks or do not deal with them in sufficient detail. Before adopting a regulation, the ECB shall conduct open public consultations, including EBA and the Commission, and analyse the potential related costs and benefits.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 588 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. National competent authorities shall follow the instructions given by the ECB for the purposes of the tasks mentioned in Article 4(1). Instructions given by the ECB shall not interfere with the exercise of voting rights by competent authorities of participating Member States within the Board of Supervisors and the Management Board of the European Banking Authority.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 615 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Within the limits set out in this Article, the ECB shall carry out the tasks in the areas referred to in Article 4 (1) and (2) in relation to credit institutions established in a participating Member State whose currency is not the euro, where a close cooperation has been established between the ECB and the national competent authority of such Member State in accordance with this Article.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 627 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The close cooperation between the ECB and the national competent authority of a non participating Member State, whose currency is not the euro, shall be established, by a decision adopted by the ECB, where the following conditions are met:
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 636 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The decision referred to in paragraph 2 shall determine, in compliance with the Statute of ESCB and of the ECB, the conditions under which representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States which established a close cooperation in accordance with this Article shall take part to the activities of the Supervisory Board.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 639 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The decision referred to in paragraph 2 shall determine, in compliance with the Statute of ESCB and of the ECB, the conditions under which representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States which established a close cooperation in accordance with this Article shall take part to the activities of the Supervisory Board.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 650 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Member State that has established a close cooperation with ECB may request the ECB to terminate the close cooperation at any time. In this case, the ECB shall immediately proceed to adopt a decision terminating the close cooperation. The decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall specify the date from which it is legally valid.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 721 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
If the credit institution complies with all conditions of authorisation set out in national law of that Member State, the national competent authority shall take, within the period provided for by national law, a decision to propose to the ECB to grant the authorisation. The decision shall be notified to the ECB and to . In other credit instituases, the national concernedmpetent authority shall reject the application for authorisation.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 724 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
When the ECB receives the proposal from the national competent authority referred to in the second subparagraph, it shall grant the authorisation where the conditions set out in Union law are met. The decisionexamine the proposal within 45 working days, extendable once for the same period in duly justified cases, and grant the authorisation where the conditions set out in Union law are met. In all other cases, the ECB shall reject the application for authorisation. The decision taken in accordance with this paragraph shall be notified and explained to the credit institution and to the national competent authority concerned.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 729 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the national competent authority which has proposed the authorisation in accordance with paragraph 1 considers that the authorisation must be withdrawn in accordance with the national law, it shall submit a proposal to the ECB to that end. In that case, the ECB may withdraw the authorisationshall take a decision on the proposed withdrawal taking full account of the justification for withdrawal put forward by the national competent authority.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 800 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The planning and execupreparation of the tasks conferred upon the ECB, shall be undertaken by an internal body composed of four representatives of the ECB appointed by the Executive Board of the ECB and one representative of the national authority competent for the supervision of credit institutions in each participating Member State (hereinafter "supervisory board"). The representatives of the national competent authorities of non- participating Member States shall have an observer status in the supervisory board. Non-participating Member States' representatives shall have the right to present their views in the process in relation to a decision which will have an effect on a credit institution in whose college of supervisors the Member State is represented. Those views shall be duly taken into account.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 812 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The planning and execution of the tasks conferred upon the ECBdrafting of decisions to be taken by the ECB with regards to supervisory tasks conferred upon it by this Regulation, shall be undertaken by an internal body composed of four representatives of the ECB appointed by the Executive Board of the ECB and one representative of the national authority competent for the supervision of credit institutions in each participating Member State (hereinafter ‘s'Supervisory bBoard').
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 819 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the supervisory board shall include a Chair elected by the members of the Governing Council from the members, with the exception of the President,supervisory board, and a Vice-Chair elected by and from the members of the supervisory board of the ECB. The Chair shall be appointed ofn the Executive Board, and a Vice-Chair elected by and from the members of the Governing Council of the ECBbasis of merit, skills, knowledge of financial institutions and markets, and of experience relevant to financial supervision and regulation, following an open selection procedure.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 829 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the supervisory board shall include a Chair elected by the members of the Governing Couperson. Appointment shall be made on the basis of merit, skills, knowledge of financial institutions and markets, and of experience relevant to financial from the members, with the exception of the Presidsupervision and regulation, following an open selection procedure. The Chairperson shall be appointed by common accord of the government,s of the Executive Board, and a Vice-Chair elected by and from the members of the Governing Council of the ECBMember States at the level of Heads of State or Government, on a recommendation from the supervisory board, after it has consulted the Council and the European Parliament. The Supervisory Board elects from among its members two Vice-Chairmen.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 835 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Governing Council of the ECB may delegate clearly defined supervisory tasks and related decisions regarding individual or a set of identifiable credit institutions, financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies to tsupervisory board shall carry out full preparatory works regarding the supervisory tasks conferred upon the ECB and propose to the Governing Council of the ECB complete draft decisions, which shall be considered as adopted unless they are rejected by the Governing Council. The supervisory board, subject to the oversight and responsibility of the Governing Councilhall specify a relevant timeframe, which shall be no less than 48 hours unless earlier adoption is indispensable to prevent irreparable damage.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 839 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Governing Council of the ECB may delegate clearly defined supervisory tasks and relatedFor the purpose of paragraph 1 the Governing Council of the ECB authorises the Supervisory Board to draft decisions regarding individual or a set of identifiable credit institutions, financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies to the supervisory board, subject to. The Supervisory Board proposes a decision for final adoption by the Goversight and responsibility of the Governing Councilning Council. The decision proposed by the Supervisory Board shall be considered as adopted unless it is rejected by the Governing Council. The Governing Council can only accept or reject the proposed decision. If the Governing Council rejects the proposed decision, it shall be returned to the Supervisory Board for a review.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 860 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Chair of the European Banking Authority and, a member of the European Commission may participate as observers in the meetings of the supervisory boardand chairmen of national competent authorities from Member States remaining outside the SSM may participate as observers in the meetings of the supervisory board on condition that their request has been accepted by the supervisory board by simple majority. The Supervisory board may, if appropriately justified, restrict observers' access to confidential data.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 864 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. The Governing Council shall adopt the rules of procedure of the supervisory board includingand shall make them public. They shall ensure equal treatment of all participating Member States, including voting rights. They shall also include rules on the term of office of the Chair and the Vice-Chair. The term of off, whiceh shall not exceed five years and shall not be renewable.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 943 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the effects on non-participating Member States;
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 958 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26a 1. The ECB shall ensure that none of its supervisory decision impinges in any way on the fiscal responsibilities of non- participating Member States. 2. Where a Member State considers that a decision taken by ECB impinges on its fiscal responsibilities, it may notify the ECB, the Commission and the Council within 3 working days after notification of the ECB's decision. In its notification, the Member State shall clearly and specifically explain why and how the decision impinges on its fiscal responsibilities. In the case of such notification, the decision of the ECB shall be suspended. The Council shall, within 10 working days, convene a meeting and take a decision, by a simple majority of its members, as to whether the ECB's decision is revoked. Where the Council, after having considered the matter, does not take a decision to revoke the ECB's decision, the suspension of the ECB's decision shall be terminated.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 960 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 b (new)
1. The Commission shall monitor the functioning of the Single Supervisory Mechanism on an ongoing basis. 2. In the case of adverse developments which may seriously jeopardise the orderly functioning and integrity of financial markets or the stability of the whole or part of the financial system in the Union or threaten to distort competition in the internal market, especially in relation to the non- participating Member States, the Commission shall actively facilitate and, where deemed necessary, coordinate any actions undertaken by the relevant competent authorities including the ECB. 3. The Commission shall issue a warning or use other remedial action in response to the risks identified. 4. The Commission shall submit the warning, together with any appropriate proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. In order to be able to perform its role, the Commission shall be fully informed of any relevant developments, and shall participate as an observer in the supervisory board of the ECB.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 2 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's green paper on the EU corporate governance framework; believes that, given the diverse nature of existing national frameworks and individual listed companies, a proportional and flexible approach to corporate governance must be applied;, but also calls for the fact that the excessive bureaucratic burden need to be avoided.
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that a ‘comply or explain’ approach is the most appropriate framework to apply to EU listed companies, providing a firm regulatory framework in whiRecognises that the financial crisis revealed a lack of effectiveness of existing corporate governance principles based on a 'comply or explain' approach; companies are accountable to the shareholders that provide their capital and are also required by law to report on their corporate governance practicencludes that a core of practicable and legally binding provisions are needed and must be complemented by soft regulation such as codes of best practices as well as reinforced supervision at national and EU level;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Emphasizes that the Green Book only deals with the enterprises listed on stock, although it would be practical to also involve the OTC enterprises and the SMEs under a differentiated approach into the subject of the regulation of the corporate governance framework for European companies, as they have enormous economical potential and they serve as driving force of the European economies;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that existing codes should be strengthened and that more effective monitoring of codes and better quality of explanations are required; stresses that shareholders (not only the majority but also the minority ones) must remain central to the governance of companies and their role must be enhanced, not diminished; believes that shareholders should inform regulators when a company provides an unacceptable explanation for departing from a code of practice;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 29 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to put in place definite initiatives to ensure better representation of women on boards of directors; emphasises that corporate management and remuneration policies must comply with and foster the principle of equal treatment of women and men established by EU directives;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses that a well-governed company should be transparent and accountable to its shareholders and other stakeholders; reaffirms that directors of corporates have to take account of the sustainability, long- term interests when taking decisions, in order to minimise risks;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 35 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that there is a lack of long-term focus within the market and urges the Commission to review all relevant legislation to assess whether any requirements have inadvertently added to short-termism; in particular calls on the Commission to abandon the requirement for quarterly reporting in the Transparency Directive, which adds little to shareholder knowledge and simply creates short-term trading opportunities., calls on the Commission to bring forward legislative proposals in the field of company law to help address corporate governance issues and ensure consistency in remuneration policy for all types of companies;
2011/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2011/0261(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
-
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal;
2012/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 37 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the work carried out so far by the Commission, but deplores its obvious reluctance to make concrete proposals and its failure toand welcomes its respondse to the call made by Parliament in its resolution of March 2010 for a feasibility study on an EU-based FTTthe FTT as part of its planned impact assessment;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the main advantage of innovative financing tools, as compared to traditional ones, is their can bring double dividend, as they can at the same time contribute to the achievement of important policy goals, such as financial market stability, and offer significant revenue potential; stresses, in this context, that the effects of these tools on the negative externalities produced by the financial sector should also be taken into account;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 76 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned that there is a high risk that the momentum behNotes the rapid evolution of the debate concernindg the proposal to introduce a global FTT is about to be lost and deplores the fact that the G20 has so far been unable to promotFTT and the increasingly differentiated evaluation of the feasibility, efficiency and effectiveness of such a tax as well as the emeanrgingful joint initiatives on this matter; calls on the G20 leaders to reach an agreement discussion concerning a Financial Activities Tax (FAT); calls on the G20 leaders to give guidance on the desired future onf the minimum common elements of a global FTTse various kinds of taxation;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that some EU Member States have already introduced similar types of transaction taxes with no apparent negative impact, while other EU Member States have experienced strong negative impacts, including massive delocalization of financial activities, a phenomenon that could only be partially reversed after the tax was abolished;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses, further, that the flow of merely speculative transactions to other jurisdictions would not have few detrimental effects, but could have the potential to contribute to increased market efficiency; also stresses that not all actions deemed to be speculation are to be condemned, rather that a broad variety of risk taking is necessary to maintain the stability of EU financial markets; recalls that the high interest rates offered on bonds in states experiencing a debt crisis are geared towards attracting the speculator's resources in order to help overcome the crisis;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the importance of comprehensive rules on exemptions and thresholds in order to ensure that the main burden is not transferred toInsists on examining who will eventually be paying the tax, as taxes are usually burdened on the consumer, which in this case would be retail investors and individuals;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 149 #

2010/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls on the Commission to produce a feasibility assessment in order to establish in the long run a system under which Member States may participate in the issuance of common European bonds; calls for the inclusion in such an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of all options, taking into account possible moral hazard implications for participating members;
2010/11/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2010/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Suggests that the Commission should propose a procedure for cooperation between the Commission and IMF, in the special case where countries from the Euro zone need financial support based on reform programs in order to restore the fiscal balance;
2010/03/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2010/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Recalls that inflation is not an answer to the need for fiscal adjustment because it would impose substantial economic costs and create risks for sustainable and inclusive growth;
2010/03/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2010/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Takes the view that any program of fiscal consolidation in developed countries should take into account the new commitment regarding the Copenhagen Accord that suggests that $100 billion per year will be needed by 2020 to help developing countries overcome the challenge of climate change; further takes the view that the Commission should draw up a proposal regarding the initiative of cooperation with other international organizations on how to raise this amount by 2020;
2010/03/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 206 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The scoreboard shall be made up of an array of macroeconomic and, macrofinancial indicators for Member Stateand structural indicators, which are adequate to measure the economic equilibrium and competitiveness of Member States in comparison to other Member States as well as their international competitiveness. The Commission may set indicative lower or upper thresholds for these indicators to serve as alert levels. The thresholds should incorporate the catching up process for non Euro area Member States. The thresholds applicable to Member States whose currency is not the euro may be different from those applicable to the otherEuro area Member States.
2011/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) To strengthen the solidarity between Member States in the case of a CommunityUnion Emergency and in particular to support Member States which are exposed to less favourable geographical or geological conditions, Member States should devise specific measures to exercise solidarity, as provided for in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, including measures such as commercial agreements between natural gas undertakings, compensation mechanisms, increased gas exports or increased releases from storages. Solidarity measures may be particularly appropriate between Member States for which the Commission recommends the establishment of joint preventive actions plans or emergency plans at regional level.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
This Regulation establishes measures aimed at safeguarding the security of gas supply so as to ensure the proper and continuous functioning of the internal market for gas, and setting up exceptional measures to be implemented where the market cannot deliver the required gas supply, by providing for a clear definition and attribution of responsibilities and for a coordination of the response at the level of the Member States and the CommunityUnion regarding both preventive action and the reaction to concrete disruptions of supply in a spirit of solidarity between the Member States.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) "protected customers" means all household customers already connected to a gas distribution network, and, if the Member State concerned so decides, canmay also include other customers, such as small and medium-sized enterprises, schools and hospitals provided that they are already connected to a gas distribution network;
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Preventive Action Plan shall take into account cost efficiency, economic effectiveness, effects on the functioning of the internal energy market and environmental impact.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point 3
(3) Emergency level (Emergency): when an exceptionally high demand occurs or when there is a disruption of the supply through or from the largest infrastructure or source andor there is a credible risk that the supply standard to the protected customers can no longer be met with market based instruments alone.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 63 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall verify within one weekthree days whether the declaration of an Emergency is justifiedfulfils the criteria indicated in paragraph 2 and whether it does not impose an undue burden on the natural gas undertakings and on the functioning of the internal market. The Commission may, in particular, ask the Competent Authority to modify measures imposing an undue burden on natural gas undertakings and to lift its declaration of Emergency if the Commission considers it not or no longer justified.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where the Commission considers that in the case of a Union Emergency, the actions taken by the Competent Authority or natural gas undertakings are insufficient , the Commission may implement directly the measures listed in Annexes II and III in order to restore the gas supply to the affected markets.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 4 #

2009/0011(CNS)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1a (new)
1a. Acknowledges that there are uncertainties concerning the availability of margins under heading 2; emphasises that the financing of the economic recovery plan should not put at risk future needs within that category of expenditure; expresses its preference for using the margins of the budget years that are at their closure;
2009/03/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2008/2334(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the Economic Recovery Plan proposes multi-layered coordinated action to strengthen Europe's economies; reiterates Parliament's readiness to enter into negotiations with the Council for the EUR 5 000 000 000 revision of the MFF 2007-2013 proposed by Commission and any other modification of instruments that would have a budgetary impact; considers that negotiations should concentrate on extending the area of projects supported within this budgetary revision, in accordance with Member States’ priorities;
2009/01/27
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2008/2334(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the predominant role of the European Investment Bank in contributing to financing investments and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD(EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in contributing to financing investments and enhancing access to financing for business (SMEs and mid- sized corporations);
2009/01/27
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 27 #

2008/2334(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Emphasises that the Economic Recovery Plan proposed is a temporary measure and the budgetary stimulus should be consistent with the flexibility provided by the Stability and Growth Pact; monitoring procedures should prevail in order to ensure the efficiency of this Plan;
2009/01/27
Committee: BUDG