BETA

Activities of Mariya GABRIEL

Plenary speeches (364)

Promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0112(COD)
Promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0112(COD)
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0280(COD)
Establishing the Digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0227(COD)
Establishing the Digital Europe programme for the period 2021-2027 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0227(COD)
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0280(COD)
Review of the Bulgarian Council Presidency (continuation of debate) BG
2016/11/22
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0287(COD)
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0287(COD)
Dadaab refugee camp (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2593(RSP)
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2342(INI)
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2342(INI)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 9 and 10 March 2017, including the Rome Declaration (debate) BG
2016/11/22
EU priorities for the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2017 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Tackling the disappearance of migrant children in Europe (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0307(COD)
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0075(COD)
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0075(COD)
Managing migration along the Central Mediterranean Route (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Gabon (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2510(RSP)
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Burundi FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2508(RSP)
Programme of activities of the Maltese Presidency (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 15 December 2016 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Georgia and Europol (A8-0343/2016 - Claude Moraes) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0810(CNS)
CAP tools to reduce price volatility in agricultural markets (A8-0339/2016 - Angélique Delahaye) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2034(INI)
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: revision of the suspension mechanism (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0142(COD)
Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2986(RSP)
Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2986(RSP)
EU-Algeria Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Algeria in Union programmes (A8-0367/2016 - Pier Antonio Panzeri) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0195(NLE)
Rights of women in the Eastern Partnership States (A8-0365/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2060(INI)
Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter 2015 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2219(INI)
Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (Article 36 TEU) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2036(INI)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3001(RSP)
US-EU Agreement on the protection of personal information relating to criminal offenses (A8-0354/2016 - Jan Philipp Albrecht) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0126(NLE)
EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women (B8-1229/2016, B8-1235/2016) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0317/2016 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2067(INI)
EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Macro-financial assistance to Jordan (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0197(COD)
European Defence Union (A8-0316/2016 - Urmas Paet) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2052(INI)
Increasing the effectiveness of development cooperation (A8-0322/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2139(INI)
Situation in Syria (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul (RC-B8-1159/2016, B8-1159/2016, B8-1160/2016, B8-1161/2016, B8-1164/2016, B8-1165/2016, B8-1166/2016, B8-1169/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2956(RSP)
Nuclear security and non-proliferation (B8-1120/2016, RC-B8-1122/2016, B8-1122/2016, B8-1125/2016, B8-1129/2016, B8-1130/2016, B8-1131/2016, B8-1132/2016)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2936(RSP)
EU Youth Strategy 2013-2015 (A8-0250/2016 - Andrea Bocskor)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2351(INI)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (A8-0236/2016 - Ska Keller) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0089(NLE)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (debate) BG
2016/11/22
EU Trust Fund for Africa: implications for development and humanitarian aid (A8-0221/2016 - Ignazio Corrao) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2341(INI)
Post-electoral situation in Gabon (debate) FR
2016/11/22
UN High-level Summit on addressing large movements of refugees and migrants (debate) FR
2016/11/22
EU relations with Tunisia in the current regional context (debate) FR
2016/11/22
European Border and Coast Guard (A8-0200/2016 - Artis Pabriks) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0310(COD)
A global strategy for the EU's Foreign and Security Policy (debate) FR
2016/11/22
New initiatives related to the Middle East Peace Process (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 28 and 29 June 2016 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
The fight against trafficking in human beings in the EU's external relations (A8-0205/2016 - Barbara Lochbihler) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2340(INI)
Massacres in eastern Congo (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
State of play of the external aspects of the European migration agenda: towards a new 'Migration Compact' (debate) FR
2016/11/22
2015 Report on policy coherence for development (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2317(INI)
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Djibouti FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2694(RSP)
Follow-up and state of play of the Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (B8-0583/2016, B8-0587/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2696(RSP)
Entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, volunteering, pupil exchange and au pairing (debate) FR
2016/11/22
EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (A8-0164/2016 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0091(COD)
Turkey's progress in fulfilling the requirements of the Visa liberalisation roadmap (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy in mountainous regions of the EU (A8-0074/2016 - Iliana Iotova) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2279(INI)
Products originating in certain ACP states (A8-0010/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0128(COD)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (A8-0066/2016 - Roberta Metsola, Kashetu Kyenge) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Democratic Republic of the Congo FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Eritrea (B8-0318/2016, B8-0319/2016, B8-0320/2016, B8-0321/2016, B8-0322/2016, B8-0323/2016, B8-0324/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2568(RSP)
Procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings (A8-0020/2015 - Caterina Chinnici) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0408(COD)
Interinstitutional agreement on Better law-making (A8-0039/2016 - Danuta Maria Hübner) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2005(ACI)
Situation in Eritrea (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments (A8-0006/2016 - Marc Tarabella) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0014(COD)
Gender mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament (A8-0034/2016 - Angelika Mlinar) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2230(INI)
The situation of women refugees and asylum seekers in the EU (A8-0024/2016 - Mary Honeyball) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2325(INI)
Situation in Syria (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Communication on implementing the European agenda on migration (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS (RC-B8-0149/2016, B8-0149/2016, B8-0154/2016, B8-0156/2016, B8-0157/2016, B8-0159/2016, B8-0161/2016, B8-0162/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18 and 19 February 2016 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Libya (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (A8-0359/2015 - Heidi Hautala) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0006(COD)
Eurojust and Ukraine Cooperation Agreement (A8-0007/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0810(CNS)
Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement (A8-0008/2016 - Nathalie Griesbeck) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0812(CNS)
Mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy (A8-0003/2016 - Mark Demesmaeker) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2137(INI)
Refugee emergency, external borders control and future of Schengen - Respect for the international principle of non-refoulement - Financing refugee facility for Turkey - Increased racist hatred and violence against refugees and migrants across Europe (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine (RC-B8-0068/2016, B8-0068/2016, B8-0069/2016, B8-0077/2016, B8-0078/2016, B8-0079/2016, B8-0080/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3032(RSP)
Mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) (RC-B8-0043/2016, B8-0043/2016, B8-0045/2016, B8-0051/2016, B8-0057/2016, B8-0058/2016, B8-0059/2016, B8-0060/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3034(RSP)
Programme of activities of the Dutch Presidency (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Presumption of innocence and right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings (A8-0133/2015 - Nathalie Griesbeck) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0407(COD)
Colombian peace process (RC-B8-0041/2016, B8-0041/2016, B8-0042/2016, B8-0053/2016, B8-0054/2016, B8-0055/2016, B8-0061/2016, B8-0062/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3033(RSP)
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 December 2015 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 December 2015 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Operational and strategic cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Europol (A8-0352/2015 - Lorenzo Fontana) BG
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0808(CNS)
Preparing for the World Humanitarian Summit: Challenges and opportunities for humanitarian assistance (A8-0332/2015 - Enrique Guerrero Salom) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2051(INI)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2014 and the EU policy on the matter (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2229(INI)
Detention and use of force against asylum-seekers (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Strategic cooperation in the fight against serious crime and terrorism between the United Arab Emirates and Europol (A8-0351/2015 - Alessandra Mussolini) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0809(CNS)
Decision adopted on the European border and coast guard package (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2967(RSP)
Recent terrorist attacks in Paris (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2063(INI)
Outcome of the Valletta summit of 11 and 12 November 2015 and of the G20 summit of 15 and 16 November 2015 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Outcome of the Valletta summit of 11 and 12 November 2015 and of the G20 summit of 15 and 16 November 2015 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Financing of two new EU trust funds for Syria and Africa and Member States' contributions to these funds (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Financing of two new EU trust funds for Syria and Africa and Member States' contributions to these funds (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Smart Borders (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2868(RSP)
Smart Borders (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2868(RSP)
Situation in Israel and Palestine (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in South Sudan (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Situation in Turkey (debate) BG
2016/11/22
Humanitarian situation of refugees within the EU and neighbouring countries (continuation of debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Libya (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2004(INI)
Conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on migration (14 September 2015) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Women's careers in science and university (A8-0235/2015 - Elissavet Vozemberg) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2251(INI)
Migration and refugees in Europe (RC-B8-0832/2015, B8-0832/2015, B8-0833/2015, B8-0834/2015, B8-0835/2015, B8-0837/2015, B8-0838/2015, B8-0842/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2833(RSP)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece (A8-0245/2015 - Ska Keller) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0125(NLE)
The EU's role in the Middle East peace process (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0680/2015, B8-0680/2015, B8-0681/2015, B8-0682/2015, B8-0683/2015, B8-0686/2015, B8-0687/2015, B8-0688/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Security challenges in the Middle East and North Africa and prospects for political stability (A8-0193/2015 - Vincent Peillon) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2229(INI)
Review of the European neighbourhood policy (A8-0194/2015 - Eduard Kukan) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2002(INI)
Situation in Burundi (RC-B8-0657/2015, B8-0657/2015, B8-0658/2015, B8-0665/2015, B8-0666/2015, B8-0667/2015, B8-0668/2015, B8-0669/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2723(RSP)
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (RC-B8-0215/2008, B8-0215/2015, B8-0216/2015, B8-0221/2015, B8-0222/2015, B8-0223/2015, B8-0224/2015, B8-0225/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2573(RSP)
Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2219(INI)
Unstable situation in Libya and its consequences (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Way forward for Frontex and the European Asylum Support Office (continuation of debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Shortage of funding for the UNRWA (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Shortage of funding for the UNRWA (debate) FR
2016/11/22
The work of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2154(INI)
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Egypt (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Review of the Italian Presidency (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Libya (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Women on company boards (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Renewing the EU Internal Security Strategy (B8-0350/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2918(RSP)
Situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (B8-0362/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2907(RSP)
Child malnutrition in developing countries (B8-0253/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2853(RSP)
25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate) FR
2016/11/22
The EU and the global development framework after 2015 (A8-0037/2014 - Davor Ivo Stier) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2143(INI)
Situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Presentation by the Commission President-elect of the College of Commissioners and their programme (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2811(RSP)
EU annual report on human rights and democracy in the world (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Ukraine and state of play of EU-Russia relations (RC-B8-0118/2014, B8-0118/2014, B8-0122/2014, B8-0123/2014, B8-0125/2014, B8-0127/2014, B8-0128/2014, B8-0129/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2841(RSP)
EU response to the Ebola outbreak (RC-B8-0107/2014, B8-0107/2014, B8-0108/2014, B8-0114/2014, B8-0115/2014, B8-0119/2014, B8-0124/2014, B8-0126/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2842(RSP)
Situation in Iraq and Syria and the ISIS offensive including the persecution of minorities (RC-B8-0109/2014, B8-0109/2014, B8-0110/2014, B8-0121/2014, B8-0130/2014, B8-0134/2014, B8-0137/2014, B8-0138/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2843(RSP)
Situation in Libya (RC-B8-0111/2014, B8-0111/2014, B8-0120/2014, B8-0131/2014, B8-0132/2014, B8-0133/2014, B8-0135/2014, B8-0136/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2844(RSP)
Israel-Palestine after the Gaza war and the role of the EU (B8-0112/2014, B8-0113/2014, B8-0116/2014, RC-B8-0117/2014, B8-0117/2014, B8-0139/2014, B8-0140/2014, B8-0141/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2845(RSP)
Trade with Euromed countries (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Freedom of expression and assembly in Egypt FR
2016/11/22
Nigeria, recent attacks by Boko Haram FR
2016/11/22
Situation in Iraq (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Programme of activities of the Italian Presidency (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Honey (A7-0440/2013 - Julie Girling)
2016/11/22
Agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries (A7-0217/2014 - Esther Herranz García)
2016/11/22
69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (A7-0250/2014 - Alexander Graf Lambsdorff)
2016/11/22
European Year for Development (2015) (A7-0384/2013 - Charles Goerens)
2016/11/22
Reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine (A7-0238/2014 - Paweł Zalewski)
2016/11/22
EU comprehensive approach and coherence of EU external action (A7-0138/2014 - Arnaud Danjean)
2016/11/22
Policy coherence for development (A7-0161/2014 - Charles Goerens)
2016/11/22
EU-Azerbaijan Agreement on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (A7-0155/2014 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
EU-Azerbaijan Agreement on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (A7-0154/2014 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Humanitarian engagement of armed non-State actors in child protection (A7-0160/2014 - Judith Sargentini)
2016/11/22
Freedom of movement for workers (A7-0386/2013 - Edit Bauer)
2016/11/22
EU citizenship report 2013 (A7-0107/2014 - Nikolaos Salavrakos)
2016/11/22
Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and Internal Security Fund (general provisions) - Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund - Internal Security Fund (Police cooperation, preventing and combating crime and crisis management) - Internal Security Fund (External borders and visas) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0367(COD)
Farm structure surveys and survey on agricultural production methods (A7-0111/2014 - Paolo De Castro)
2016/11/22
Activities of the Committee on Petitions 2013 (A7-0131/2014 - Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa)
2016/11/22
Horticulture (A7-0048/2014 - Anthea McIntyre)
2016/11/22
Eradication of torture in the world (A7-0100/2014 - Véronique De Keyser)
2016/11/22
Visa requirements for third-countries nationals - Future of EU visa policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0415(COD)
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (A7-0373/2013 - Mariya Gabriel) (vote)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0309(COD)
Control of persons at external borders (A7-0082/2014 - Tanja Fajon)
2016/11/22
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (A7-0373/2013 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Fundamental rights in the European Union (2012) (A7-0051/2014 - Louis Michel)
2016/11/22
Sexual exploitation and prostitution and its impact on gender equality (A7-0071/2014 - Mary Honeyball)
2016/11/22
European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (A7-0158/2013 - Michèle Striffler)
2016/11/22
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (A7-0183/2013 - Emer Costello)
2016/11/22
Combating violence against women (A7-0075/2014 - Antonyia Parvanova)
2016/11/22
Elimination of female genital mutilation (debate)
2016/11/22
Situation in Ukraine (RCB7-0138/2014, B7-0138/2014, B7-0139/2014, B7-0140/2014, B7-0158/2014, B7-0161/2014, B7-0163/2014, B7-0164/2014)
2016/11/22
2013 progress report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B7-0074/2014)
2016/11/22
2013 progress report on Montenegro (B7-0072/2014)
2016/11/22
Undocumented women migrants in the European Union (A7-0001/2014 - Norica Nicolai)
2016/11/22
Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of seasonal employment (A7-0428/2013 - Claude Moraes)
2016/11/22
Europe's role in the Central African Republic (debate)
2016/11/22
Syrian refugees arriving at the Bulgarian borders (debate)
2016/11/22
Homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity (A7-0009/2014 - Ulrike Lunacek)
2016/11/22
Small agricultural holdings (A7-0029/2014 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
2016/11/22
Honey (A7-0440/2013 - Julie Girling)
2016/11/22
Situation in South Sudan (debate)
2016/11/22
Common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's instruments for external action (A7-0447/2013 - Elmar Brok)
2016/11/22
Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries (A7-0446/2013 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
2016/11/22
Milk production in mountain areas, disadvantaged areas and outermost regions (A7-0383/2013 - Herbert Dorfmann)
2016/11/22
Rights and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020 - Justice Programme 2014-2020 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0369(COD)
Justice Programme 2014-2020 (A7-0396/2013 - Luigi Berlinguer, Philip Claeys)
2016/11/22
Rights and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020 (A7-0397/2013 - Kinga Göncz)
2016/11/22
Volunteering and voluntary activity in Europe (A7-0348/2013 - Marco Scurria)
2016/11/22
Common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's instruments for external action - Instrument for stability - Financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide - Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries - Establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation - European neighbourhood instrument - Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0404(COD)
Human rights in the world 2012 and EU policy on the matter (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2152(INI)
Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development - Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products - Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP - Transitional provisions on support for rural development (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0117(COD)
Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP (A7-0363/2013 - Giovanni La Via)
2016/11/22
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (A7-0361/2013 - Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos)
2016/11/22
Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (A7-0366/2013 - Michel Dantin)
2016/11/22
Direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP (A7-0362/2013 - Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos)
2016/11/22
Transitional provisions on support for rural development (A7-0326/2013 - Albert Deß)
2016/11/22
Erasmus for all programme (A7-0405/2012 - Doris Pack)
2016/11/22
Europe for Citizens programme (A7-0424/2012 - Hannu Takkula)
2016/11/22
Gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0299(COD)
Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the common foreign and security policy in 2012 (A7-0330/2013 - Elmar Brok)
2016/11/22
Godišnje izvješće Vijeća Europskom parlamentu o zajedničkoj vanjskoj i sigurnosnoj politici u 2012. (A7-0330/2013 - Elmar Brok) HR
2016/11/22
Main aspects and basic choices of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy (Article 36 TEU) - Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the common foreign and security policy in 2012 (debate)
2016/11/22
Human rights in the Sahel region (A7-0325/2013 - Charles Tannock)
2016/11/22
Annual report on the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2012 (A7-0299/2013 - Edward McMillan-Scott)
2016/11/22
Gendercide: the missing women? (A7-0245/2013 - Antigoni Papadopoulou)
2016/11/22
Convention on preventing and combating violence against women (Istanbul convention) (debate)
2016/11/22
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2012 (A7-0257/2013 - Nikolaos Salavrakos)
2016/11/22
Equal pay for male and female workers (B7-0387/2013)
2016/11/22
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2822(RSP)
Situation in the Central African Republic (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2823(RSP)
Endangered European languages and linguistic diversity (A7-0239/2013 - François Alfonsi)
2016/11/22
EU-Cape Verde agreement on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the EU (A7-0266/2013 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
EU-Cape Verde agreement on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (A7-0267/2013 - Mariya Gabriel)
2016/11/22
Tackling youth unemployment: possible ways out (A7-0275/2013 - Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska)
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (debate)
2016/11/22
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing EU external borders (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0138(COD)
Order of business
2016/11/22
Second amendment to the Cotonou Agreement of 23 June 2000 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0207(NLE)
Freedom of press and media in the world - Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world 2012 and the European Union's policy on the matter - Promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2081(INI)
Reconstruction and democratisation of Mali (debate)
2016/11/22
Mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0130(COD)
Asset recovery to Arab Spring countries in transition (debate)
2016/11/22
One year of European Citizens' Initiative in practice: evaluating experience and tackling obstacles (debate)
2016/11/22
Financing of EU cooperation for African, Caribbean and Pacific States and overseas countries and territories for 2014-2020 (A7-0049/2013 - Patrice Tirolien)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP - 2011/0280(COD) (B7-0079/2013)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) - 2011/0281(COD) (B7-0080/2013)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - 2011/0282(COD) (B7-0081/2013)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on financing, management and monitoring of the CAP - 2011/0288(COD) (B7-0082/2013)
2016/11/22
Situation in Egypt
2016/11/22
Situation in Mali (debate)
2016/11/22
Cooperation and verification mechanism: methodology, current application and its future (debate)
2016/11/22
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the CAP - 2011/0280(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) - 2011/0281(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - 2011/0282(COD) - Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on financing, management and monitoring of the CAP - 2011/0288(COD) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2528(RSP)
Impact of the economic crisis on gender equality and women's rights - Eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU - Situation of women in North Africa (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2116(INI)
Rule of law and freedom in Bulgaria (debate)
2016/11/22
Elimination and prevention of all forms of violence against women and girls (debate)
2016/11/22
Situation in the Central African Republic
2016/11/22
Youth guarantee (B7-0007/2013)
2016/11/22
Youth guarantee (B7-0007/2013)
2016/11/22
EU strategy for the Horn of Africa (A7-0408/2012 - Charles Tannock)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2058(REG)
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2907(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0459(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0459(COD)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2011 and the European Union's policy on the matter - EU's human rights strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2145(INI)
Situation in Egypt (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0093(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0322(NLE)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0322(NLE)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0271(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2027(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0145(COD)
EU strategy for the Danube region (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0239(COD)
Current management of the sugar sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Direct payments to farmers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0286(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0377(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0117(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0117(COD)
EU Special Representative for Human Rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Latest developments in the Middle East, including the situation in Syria (debate)
2016/11/22
Follow-up of the elections in the Democratic Republic of Congo (debate)
2016/11/22
Equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2285(INL)
Sudan and South Sudan (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0131(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0131(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0131(COD)
Visa-free travel to Canada for all EU citizens and the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (debate)
2016/11/22
Women and climate change (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2197(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2194(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2194(INI)
EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0380(COD)
Equality between women and men in the European Union - 2011 - Women in political decision-making (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2295(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0362(COD)
Women’s situation in war (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2198(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0241(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2115(INI)
Fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0254(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2120(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0251(COD)
Ombudsman's annual report 2010 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2106(INI)
Sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography - Children's rights in the European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0064(COD)
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0280(COD)
"Food for Free" programme (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0249(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2295(INI)
Situation in Libya (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2811(RSP)
Closing the gap between anti-corruption law and reality (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0167(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0028(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0028(COD)
Situation in the Arab world and North Africa - Situation in Yemen - Situation in Syria (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2756(RSP)
EU external policies in favour of democratisation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2032(INI)
Changes to Schengen (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2753(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0156(NLE)
The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0280(COD)
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2012(INI)
Sudan and South Sudan (debate)
2016/11/22
Application of Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0820(NLE)
Main aspects of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy - Situation in Syria and in Camp Ashraf - Report: Albertini - Annual report from the Council to Parliament on the main aspects of CFSP in 2009 - Report: Gualtieri - Development of CSDP following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty - Report: Muñiz De Urquiza - The EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2299(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0036(COD)
Fourth United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2599(RSP)
Situation in Côte d’Ivoire
2016/11/22
Political parties at European level and rules regarding their funding (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2201(INI)
EU policy framework to fight violence against women (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2209(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2050(INI)
Southern Neighbourhood, and Libya in particular, including humanitarian aspects (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2616(RSP)
Female poverty - Equality between women and men - 2010 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2138(INI)
Female poverty - Equality between women and men - 2010 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2138(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2150(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2150(INI)
Situation in Egypt (debate)
2016/11/22
Eavesdropping scandal in Bulgaria (debate)
2016/11/22
Referendum on the future status of Southern Sudan (debate)
2016/11/22
Security situation in the Sahel region (debate)
2016/11/22
Citizens’ initiative (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0074(COD)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
2016/11/22
Extension of the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC to beneficiaries of international protection (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0112(COD)
European Ombudsman's activity report for 2009 - Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in Complaint 676/2008/RT (According to Rule 205(2), 1st part) - 26th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of European Union Law (2008) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2059(INI)
European Ombudsman's activity report for 2009 - Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in Complaint 676/2008/RT (According to Rule 205(2), 1st part) - 26th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of European Union Law (2008) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2059(INI)
Future of the Africa/EU strategic partnership on the eve of 3rd Africa/EU summit (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0064(COD)
Strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2839(RSP)
Instrument for Stability - Financing instrument for development cooperation - Financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide - Financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised countries - Financing instrument for development cooperation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0058(COD)
Ukraine (debate)
2016/11/22
Failures in protection of human rights and justice in the Democratic Republic of Congo (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2857(RSP)
Situation of the Jordan River with special regard to the Lower Jordan River area (debate)
2016/11/22
Freedom of expression and press freedom in the European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
2016/11/22
Gender aspects of the economic downturn and financial crisis - Assessment of the results of the 2006-2010 Roadmap for Equality between women and men and forward looking recommendations - Charter for Women’s Rights - follow up (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2204(INI)
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0814(NLE)
SWIFT (debate)
2016/11/22
Ban on use of cyanide mining technologies (debate)
2016/11/22
Development of the European Citizens’ Initiative based on Article 11(4) of the Treaty on European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow? (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2105(INI)
Parliament’s priorities for the UN Human Rights Council (Geneva, 1-26 March 2010) (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Beijing +15 - UN Platform for Action for Gender Equality (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0091(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0105(COD)
Situation in Iran (debate)
2016/11/22
Second revision of the ACP-EU Partnership agreement (Cotonou agreement) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2165(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0062(NLE)
Modification of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (the ‘Single CMO Regulation’) (debate)
2016/11/22

Reports (30)

REPORT on rights of women in the Eastern Partnership States PDF (450 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2016/2060(INI)
Documents: PDF(450 KB) DOC(83 KB)
REPORT on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by the European Police Office (Europol) of the Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Ukraine and Europol PDF (451 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0811(CNS)
Documents: PDF(451 KB) DOC(60 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federated States of Micronesia on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (452 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0098(NLE)
Documents: PDF(452 KB) DOC(53 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (452 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0096(NLE)
Documents: PDF(452 KB) DOC(56 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Marshall Islands on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (454 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0103(NLE)
Documents: PDF(454 KB) DOC(58 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Kiribati on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (450 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0200(NLE)
Documents: PDF(450 KB) DOC(52 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Tuvalu on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (449 KB) DOC (49 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0100(NLE)
Documents: PDF(449 KB) DOC(49 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Ukraine) PDF (474 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0125(COD)
Documents: PDF(474 KB) DOC(51 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Georgia) PDF (472 KB) DOC (60 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2016/0075(COD)
Documents: PDF(472 KB) DOC(60 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (368 KB) DOC (92 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0199(NLE)
Documents: PDF(368 KB) DOC(92 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Tonga on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (368 KB) DOC (90 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0196(NLE)
Documents: PDF(368 KB) DOC(90 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (377 KB) DOC (97 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0201(NLE)
Documents: PDF(377 KB) DOC(97 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Palau on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (366 KB) DOC (89 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0193(NLE)
Documents: PDF(366 KB) DOC(89 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Vanuatu on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0052(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(91 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0058(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(93 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Grenada on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (166 KB) DOC (90 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0057(NLE)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(90 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0061(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(93 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Arab Emirates on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (90 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0062(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(90 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0054(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(91 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Commonwealth of Dominica on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (166 KB) DOC (90 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0050(NLE)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(90 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Saint Lucia on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (92 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0060(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(92 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Independent State of Samoa on the short-stay visa waiver PDF (167 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0056(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(93 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas PDF (164 KB) DOC (74 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2013/0356(NLE)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(74 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation PDF (166 KB) DOC (74 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2013/0358(NLE)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(74 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement PDF (208 KB) DOC (276 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2012/0309(COD)
Documents: PDF(208 KB) DOC(276 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation PDF (141 KB) DOC (79 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2012/0268(NLE)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(79 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union PDF (143 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2012/0271(NLE)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(80 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops PDF (224 KB) DOC (355 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2010/0133(COD)
Documents: PDF(224 KB) DOC(355 KB)
REPORT on equality between women and men in the European Union – 2010 PDF (230 KB) DOC (154 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2010/2138(INI)
Documents: PDF(230 KB) DOC(154 KB)
REPORT Report on the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2009 PDF (164 KB) DOC (92 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2010/2059(INI)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(92 KB)

Shadow reports (12)

REPORT on addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action PDF (459 KB) DOC (107 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AFETDEVE
Dossiers: 2015/2342(INI)
Documents: PDF(459 KB) DOC(107 KB)
REPORT on the draft Council Implementing Decision fixing the date of effect of Decision 2008/633/JHA concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences PDF (160 KB) DOC (88 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/0807(CNS)
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(88 KB)
REPORT on progress on equality between women and men in the European Union in 2013 PDF (175 KB) DOC (130 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Documents: PDF(175 KB) DOC(130 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Croatia and Cyprus of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for transit through or intended stays on their territories not exceeding 90 days in any 180-day period and repealing Decision No 895/2006/EC and Decision No 582/2008/EC of the European Parliament and the Council PDF (163 KB) DOC (247 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2013/0210(COD)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(247 KB)
REPORT on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights PDF (302 KB) DOC (151 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2013/2040(INI)
Documents: PDF(302 KB) DOC(151 KB)
REPORT on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights PDF (313 KB) DOC (160 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2013/2040(INI)
Documents: PDF(313 KB) DOC(160 KB)
REPORT on eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU PDF (208 KB) DOC (126 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2012/2116(INI)
Documents: PDF(208 KB) DOC(126 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards the application of direct payments to farmers in respect of the year 2013 PDF (228 KB) DOC (296 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2011/0286(COD)
Documents: PDF(228 KB) DOC(296 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on the participation by those States in the work of the committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers as regards the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis PDF (132 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2009/0168(NLE)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(58 KB)
REPORT on the Annual Report on the European Ombudsman’s activities in 2010 PDF (177 KB) DOC (107 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PETI
Dossiers: 2011/2106(INI)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(107 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the list of travel documents entitling the holder to cross the external borders and which may be endorsed with a visa and on setting up a mechanism for establishing this list PDF (192 KB) DOC (153 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2010/0325(COD)
Documents: PDF(192 KB) DOC(153 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/109/EC to extend its scope to beneficiaries of international protection PDF (210 KB) DOC (226 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2007/0112(COD)
Documents: PDF(210 KB) DOC(226 KB)

Opinions (8)

POSITION IN THE FORM OF AMENDMENTS on EU political relations with India
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(334 KB) DOC(84 KB)
OPINION on the current political situation in Afghanistan
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(189 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/110/CE relating to honey
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(648 KB)
OPINION on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2012 and the European Union’s policy on the matter
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(110 KB) DOC(311 KB)
OPINION on the situation of human rights in the Sahel region
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(191 KB)
OPINION on preparation of the multiannual financial framework regarding the financing of EU cooperation for African, Caribbean and Pacific States and Overseas Countries and Territories for the 2014-2020 period (11th European Development Fund)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(119 KB) DOC(97 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Justice Programme
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(481 KB)
OPINION on the Annual report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2011 and the European Union’s policy on the matter
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(112 KB) DOC(96 KB)

Shadow opinions (13)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2016/0407(COD)
Documents: PDF(471 KB) DOC(129 KB)
OPINION on the annual report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter 2015
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2016/2219(INI)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(76 KB)
OPINION on the future of ACP-EU relations beyond 2020
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2016/2053(INI)
Documents: PDF(128 KB) DOC(71 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims from a gender perspective
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2015/2118(INI)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(212 KB)
OPINION on implementation and review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2015/2220(INI)
Documents: PDF(129 KB) DOC(190 KB)
OPINION on recommendations to the European Commission on the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
2016/11/22
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2014/2228(INI)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(183 KB)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section III – Commission and executive agencies
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2014/2075(DEC)
Documents: PDF(110 KB) DOC(173 KB)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, Section X - European External Action Service
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2014/2086(DEC)
Documents: PDF(113 KB) DOC(176 KB)
OPINION on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2013 and the European Union’s policy on the matter
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2014/2216(INI)
Documents: PDF(239 KB) DOC(199 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2013/0110(COD)
Documents: PDF(205 KB) DOC(629 KB)
OPINION on The EU comprehensive approach and its implications for the coherence of EU external action
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2013/2146(INI)
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(314 KB)
OPINION on the efforts of the international community in the area of development and of ‘state building’ in South Sudan
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2013/2090(INI)
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(179 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a Council decision establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2010/0816(NLE)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(454 KB)

Institutional motions (92)

JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (276 KB) DOC (49 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2703(RSP)
Documents: PDF(276 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (275 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2703(RSP)
Documents: PDF(275 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zambia, particularly the case of Hakainde Hichilema PDF (153 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2681(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan PDF (164 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2683(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Dadaab refugee camp PDF (159 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2687(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zambia, particularly the case of Hakainde Hichilema PDF (151 KB) DOC (51 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2681(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan PDF (147 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2683(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Dadaab refugee camp PDF (149 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2687(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Gabon PDF (288 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2510(RSP)
Documents: PDF(288 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Gabon PDF (273 KB) DOC (47 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2510(RSP)
Documents: PDF(273 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (152 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2508(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Central African Republic PDF (162 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves in Iraq PDF (158 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3028(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on mass graves in Iraq PDF (144 KB) DOC (53 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3028(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (276 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3001(RSP)
Documents: PDF(276 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (202 KB) DOC (48 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/3001(RSP)
Documents: PDF(202 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (167 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (289 KB) DOC (80 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2882(RSP)
Documents: PDF(289 KB) DOC(80 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (295 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(295 KB) DOC(91 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Zimbabwe PDF (287 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2882(RSP)
Documents: PDF(287 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Somalia PDF (418 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(418 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of people with albinism in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2807(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(86 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of albinos in Africa, notably in Malawi PDF (271 KB) DOC (71 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2807(RSP)
Documents: PDF(271 KB) DOC(71 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the massacres in eastern Congo PDF (279 KB) DOC (82 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
Documents: PDF(279 KB) DOC(82 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the massacres in eastern Congo PDF (174 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2770(RSP)
Documents: PDF(174 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Djibouti PDF (283 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2694(RSP)
Documents: PDF(283 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Gambia PDF (341 KB) DOC (71 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2693(RSP)
Documents: PDF(341 KB) DOC(71 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the follow-up to and review of the 2030 Agenda PDF (285 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2696(RSP)
Documents: PDF(285 KB) DOC(83 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria PDF (372 KB) DOC (77 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2649(RSP)
Documents: PDF(372 KB) DOC(77 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the attack in Lahore PDF (272 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2644(RSP)
Documents: PDF(272 KB) DOC(73 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (164 KB) DOC (88 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2609(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(88 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Egypt, notably the case of Giulio Regeni PDF (168 KB) DOC (85 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2608(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Yemen PDF (159 KB) DOC (84 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(84 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic mass murder of religious minorities by the so-called ‘ISIS/Daesh’ PDF (168 KB) DOC (94 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(94 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (162 KB) DOC (88 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2537(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(88 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (263 KB) DOC (62 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2537(RSP)
Documents: PDF(263 KB) DOC(62 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the systematic mass murder of religious minorities by ISIS PDF (310 KB) DOC (103 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2529(RSP)
Documents: PDF(310 KB) DOC(103 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (261 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2515(RSP)
Documents: PDF(261 KB) DOC(61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia PDF (166 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2520(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine PDF (166 KB) DOC (94 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3032(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(94 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 PDF (186 KB) DOC (124 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3035(RSP)
Documents: PDF(186 KB) DOC(124 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the implementation of the Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine PDF (298 KB) DOC (96 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3032(RSP)
Documents: PDF(298 KB) DOC(96 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU priorities for the UNHRC sessions in 2016 PDF (307 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3035(RSP)
Documents: PDF(307 KB) DOC(93 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (303 KB) DOC (93 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2973(RSP)
Documents: PDF(303 KB) DOC(93 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (178 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2973(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(72 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass displacement of children in Nigeria as a result of Boko Haram attacks PDF (158 KB) DOC (85 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2876(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(85 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Central African Republic PDF (170 KB) DOC (97 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2874(RSP)
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(97 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the displacement of children in Northern Nigeria as a result of Boko Haram attacks PDF (156 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2876(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(76 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Central African Republic PDF (156 KB) DOC (78 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2874(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(78 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Angola PDF (154 KB) DOC (84 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2839(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(84 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Angola PDF (148 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2839(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s role in the Middle East peace process PDF (261 KB) DOC (69 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2685(RSP)
Documents: PDF(261 KB) DOC(69 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on migration and refugees in Europe PDF (268 KB) DOC (76 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2833(RSP)
Documents: PDF(268 KB) DOC(76 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in particular the case of the two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (159 KB) DOC (89 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2757(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(89 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (155 KB) DOC (83 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(83 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (162 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2723(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(86 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), in particular the case of two detained human rights activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma PDF (141 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2757(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(70 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Yemen PDF (263 KB) DOC (68 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2760(RSP)
Documents: PDF(263 KB) DOC(68 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Burundi PDF (172 KB) DOC (70 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2723(RSP)
Documents: PDF(172 KB) DOC(70 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism PDF (142 KB) DOC (67 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2573(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(67 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Tanzania, notably the issue of land grabbing PDF (127 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2604(RSP)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on South Sudan, including recent child abductions PDF (134 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2603(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks and abductions by Daesh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians PDF (133 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2599(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Memorandum of Understanding between the EU and the League of Arab States to cooperate on counter-terrorism PDF (231 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2573(RSP)
Documents: PDF(231 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (138 KB) DOC (74 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2561(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(74 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi: the case of Bob Rugurika PDF (130 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2561(RSP)
Documents: PDF(130 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the situation following the Peshawar school attack PDF (142 KB) DOC (66 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2514(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(66 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Egypt PDF (160 KB) DOC (86 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(86 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (150 KB) DOC (77 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(77 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ukraine PDF (150 KB) DOC (81 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2965(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(81 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan, in particular the situation following the Peshawar school attack PDF (127 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2514(RSP)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (234 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(234 KB) DOC(63 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ukraine PDF (251 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2965(RSP)
Documents: PDF(251 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Egypt PDF (232 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/3017(RSP)
Documents: PDF(232 KB) DOC(61 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan: blasphemy laws PDF (156 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2969(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iraq: kidnapping and mistreatment of women PDF (132 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2971(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Pakistan : blasphemy laws PDF (130 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2969(RSP)
Documents: PDF(130 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child PDF (159 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2919(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(91 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in South Sudan PDF (148 KB) DOC (73 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2922(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(73 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in South Sudan PDF (132 KB) DOC (65 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2922(RSP)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(65 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU’s response to the Ebola outbreak PDF (141 KB) DOC (69 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2842(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(69 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations in Bangladesh PDF (137 KB) DOC (67 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2834(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(67 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi, in particular the case of Pierre Claver Mbonimpa PDF (137 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2833(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(64 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Israel-Palestine after the Gaza war and the role of the EU PDF (124 KB) DOC (56 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2845(RSP)
Documents: PDF(124 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Libya PDF (125 KB) DOC (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2844(RSP)
Documents: PDF(125 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU response to the Ebola outbreak PDF (127 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2842(RSP)
Documents: PDF(127 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iraq and Syria, and the ISIS offensive, including the persecution of minorities PDF (134 KB) DOC (64 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2843(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(64 KB)
PROPOSITION DE RÉSOLUTION on Burundi, in particular the case of Pierre Claver Mbonimpa FR PDF (126 KB) DOC (55 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2833(RSP)
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Sudan – the case of Meriam Yahia Ibrahim PDF (138 KB) DOC (66 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2727(RSP)
Documents: PDF(138 KB) DOC(66 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on freedom of expression and assembly in Egypt PDF (157 KB) DOC (81 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2728(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(81 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Iraq PDF (126 KB) DOC (57 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2716(RSP)
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ukraine PDF (133 KB) DOC (63 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2717(RSP)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(63 KB)

Oral questions (8)

Trafficking in Human Beings PDF (98 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2642(RSP)
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Tackling the disappearance of migrant children in Europe PDF (195 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(19 KB)
The EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (203 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Documents: PDF(203 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (202 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Documents: PDF(202 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Access to energy in Africa PDF (193 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Disturbance of the free movement of goods by Greece PDF (99 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges (the proposed 'women-on-boards directive') PDF (107 KB) DOC (26 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2967(RSP)
Documents: PDF(107 KB) DOC(26 KB)
25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Written explanations (5)

Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (B8-0173/2017) BG

. – Гласувах в подкрепа на тази ключова за България резолюция, с която Европейският парламент призовава Комисията да предприеме нужните мерки за съблюдаване на механизма за визова реципрочност. С този акт бе отправено силно послание за европейска солидарност към гражданите на България, Хърватия, Кипър, Полша и Румъния, които все още се нуждаят от визи при пътувания до САЩ.Комисията подчерта, че постигането на пълна реципрочност при премахването на визовия режим със Съединените щати представлява приоритет за ЕС при представянето на последния си доклад по темата през декември 2016 г. С приетата резолюция още веднъж бе потвърдена последователната и открита позиция на Европейския парламент по въпроса. Според нея Комисията е задължена законово да приеме делегиран акт за временно въвеждане на визи за гражданите на САЩ, тъй като Вашингтон все още не е предоставил безвизов достъп за гражданите на пет държави – членки на ЕС, в това число и България.Въпреки многобройните призиви от страна на Европейския парламент в тази връзка, Комисията все още не е предприела никакви законови мерки. С приемането на настоящата резолюция на Комисията се дава двумесечен срок това да се случи.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme (A8-0017/2017 - María Teresa Giménez Barbat) BG

. – Подкрепих приемането на доклада поради изложения в него задълбочен анализ на изпълнението на програмата „Европа за гражданите“ и отправените конструктивни препоръки.Приближаването на Европейския съюз до неговите граждани винаги е била ключова цел на всички европейски институции, но то никога не е било толкова важно, колкото в контекста на настоящия дебат за бъдещето на Съюза. Важна препоръка в доклада е предложението за увеличаване на бюджета на програмата. Тя потвърждава ангажимента на Европейския парламент за подпомагане на дейности, популяризиращи ползите от европейския проект.Друг положителен елемент от доклада е предложението следващият програмен период да бъде приет съобразно обикновената законодателна процедура, за да може Парламентът да има по-активна роля. В допълнение приветствам призива към Комисията за повишаване видимостта на програмата и разширяване осведомеността на обществеността относно нейните цели чрез споделяне на най-добри практики в комуникацията на националните звена за контакт. Не на последно място, подкрепям препоръката за провеждане на обучения и семинари по тази тема от националните звена за контакт за изготвяне на ясни предложения за проекти.
2016/11/22
EU-Canada Strategic Partnership Agreement (A8-0028/2017 - Charles Tannock) BG

. – Подкрепих споразумението за стратегическо партньорство между ЕС и Канада, тъй като то утвърждава общите ни ценности и поставя рамка за сътрудничество в сфери от взаимен интерес. Канада е стратегически партньор на ЕС и засиленият политически диалог ще допринесе за постигане на напредък в области като борбата с тероризма, миграцията и образованието.Подобряването на сътрудничеството с трети държави е един от десетте приоритета на ЕНП в борбата с тероризма. Чрез разширеното партньорство ЕС и Канада поставят основа за създаването на съвместни механизми и предприемането на общи усилия на оперативно равнище. Това включва противодействие на екстремистките стратегии, както и намиране на общ подход за справяне с нововъзникващи заплахи.Задълбоченото партньорство в управлението на границите представлява конкретна стъпка по предотвратяването и контролирането на незаконната миграция. В контекста на визовата политика за България са важни и поетите ангажименти за постигане на безвизово пътуване за всички граждани на ЕС и Канада.Културата, образованието и младите хора също са във фокуса на сътрудничеството. Разширяването на възможностите за обмен, особено в областта на мобилността на младите, ще увеличи контактите между гражданите от двете страни на Атлантическия океан. Тези инициативи ще насърчат потока от идеи и ще допринесат за намирането на решения на общите предизвикателства.
2016/11/22
Revision of the European Consensus on Development (A8-0020/2017 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Norbert Neuser) FR

. – Un ambitieux nouveau consensus européen sur le développement représente un changement de paradigme dans la coopération au développement, qui nous permettra de mieux répondre aux défis les plus complexes et interconnectés auxquels le monde est confronté aujourd'hui. Cette résolution, est une contribution importante pour un agenda sur le développement durable basé sur l'ouverture, le multilatéralisme et l'objectif de prospérité partagée. Le leadership mondial de l'Union européenne en matière de développement est aujourd'hui plus que jamais nécessaire.Cette résolution contient une affirmation forte sur l'éradication de la pauvreté en tant qu'objectif principal de la politique de développement de l'UE. Aussi, elle reconnaît les défis posés par les changements dans le paysage international, y compris la fragilité et l'instabilité politique, économique et sécuritaire accrues.Ainsi, nous devons trouver de nouvelles manières d'atteindre les priorités de développement dans les pays fragiles et touchés par les conflits, notamment en établissant des liens plus étroits de coopération.Dans ce cadre, nous devons assurer une plus grande cohérence entre les politiques de l'Union et la coordination avec les États membres, ainsi qu’entre les principes d'efficacité du développement et les tendances mondiales telles que les migrations, la sécurité et la protection des droits humains.
2016/11/22
Priorities for the 61th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0018/2017 - Constance Le Grip, Maria Arena) FR

. – L'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes est un principe fondamental de l'Union. Par conséquent, nous devons jouer un rôle de premier plan dans l'accomplissement plein du cinquième objectif du développement durable: autonomiser les femmes et les filles dans le monde entier. Ainsi, ce principe directeur doit se traduire par l'élaboration et mise en œuvre de politiques et lois accompagnées d'une mobilisation des ressources nécessaires pour concrétiser les droits des femmes. Ces politiques européennes doivent viser l'élimination de toutes les violences à l'égard des femmes; l'équilibre homme-femmes à tous les niveaux du processus décisionnel; et, l'accès égal à l'emploi et à une rémunération égale pour un travail égal. De plus, nous devons veiller à la cohérence entre les politiques internes et externes de notre Union. C'est pourquoi, nous devons soutenir les programmes internationaux qui veillent à renforcer l'accès des femmes et des filles à une éducation et à une formation professionnelle de qualité. De la même manière, nous devons soutenir l’entrepreneuriat féminin, notamment en éliminant les obstacles et les préjugés sociaux. Enfin, nous devons confirmer notre engagement au programme d'action de Pékin, ainsi qu'envoyer un message fort pour la ratification de la Convention d'Istanbul par tous les États Membres.
2016/11/22

Written questions (31)

Economic measures to support the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan PDF (193 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Libya and cross-border cooperation in the Mediterranean PDF (6 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(16 KB)
EU reconstruction aid for Haiti in the wake of Hurricane Matthew PDF (195 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(17 KB)
EU reconstruction aid to Haiti in the wake of Hurricane Matthew PDF (195 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(195 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Erasmus+ for the Southern Mediterranean region PDF (101 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Stepping up the fight against terrorist financing PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Radicalisation Awareness Network PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Honey - labelling of country of origin PDF (194 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(16 KB)
The impact of national retail monopolies in some Member States on independent wine producers PDF (5 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(15 KB)
VP/HR - Electoral process in the Democratic Republic of the Congo PDF (6 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Europol's Internet Referral Unit PDF (98 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Ban on the use of neonicotinoid pesticides PDF (101 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Legal scope for extradition from third countries PDF (104 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(16 KB)
VP/HR - Upcoming phases of Operation Sophia PDF (102 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(18 KB)
State of play of the pilot multi-purpose centre in Niger PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Economic and social reform and development in Lebanon PDF (92 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(92 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Health and safety policy concerning female migrants and asylum seekers in refugee camps PDF (95 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(95 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Union Standard for Border Management PDF (98 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(98 KB) DOC(23 KB)
State of play of readmission agreements PDF (99 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(99 KB) DOC(23 KB)
The 'security' priority area of the EU Strategy for the Danube region PDF (100 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Reporting and evaluation of the progress made under the Danube Strategy PDF (5 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(25 KB)
VP/HR - Latest developments and the EU's strategy in the Great Lakes region in Africa PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
The Syria strategic communication advisory team (SSCAT) and the role of counter-narratives in preventing radicalisation PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Fight against human trafficking and the way forward PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Fight against terrorism and the priority of developing information-sharing capabilities PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Addressing albinism from the human rights perspective PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Negotiations on short-stay visa waiver agreements PDF (102 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Temporary relocation scheme for asylum seekers in Bulgaria PDF (100 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Funding and visibility of the Daphne programme PDF (103 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Rule of law in Serbia / follow-up of European Parliament resolution of 16 January 2014 PDF (103 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Residential institutions in the EU PDF (193 KB) DOC (28 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(28 KB)

Written declarations (10)

Written declaration on missing refugee children

Written declaration on the need to support and encourage the employability of young people in the Euro-Mediterranean region

Written declaration on recognising situation testing, where it yields positive results, as legal evidence of racial discrimination

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(44 KB)
Authors: Harlem DÉSIR, Dennis de JONG, Corinne LEPAGE, Ulrike LUNACEK, Mariya GABRIEL
Written declaration on the equitable distribution of agricultural subsidies between the new and old Member States

Written declaration on women’s rights in Iran

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(95 KB) DOC(44 KB)
Authors: Mariya GABRIEL, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Edit BAUER, Philippe JUVIN

Amendments (1243)

Amendment 163 #

2022/2201(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Deplores the many cases of femicide and gender-based and sexual violence; calls on the governmentauthorities to step up its efforts to combat domestic and gender- based violence and improve the protective and preventive measures in place;
2023/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2022/2142(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Member States to switch to QMV for, as a matter of priority, decisions in all areas of the CFSP, starting within a year with priority areas such asCFSP concerning the EU global human rights sanctions regime, restrictive measures and other instruments linked to the Russian war against Ukraine and interim steps in the enlargement process; stresses that unanimity decisions should remain required for the creation and deployment of military missions or operations under the common security and defence policy (CSDP);
2023/02/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2020/2129(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. emphasises that in order to realistically achieve effective compliance with a high level standard in supply chain due diligence, there need to be incentives for enterprises.
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Joint Staff Working Document on 'Gender Equality and Women´s Empowerment: Transforming the lives of Girls and Women through EU External relations 2016-2020'1a, _________________ 1a SWD(2015)0182
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas India is a vibrant democracy and an open society with a free press and an active civil society; whereas the EU and India have regularly exchanged best practices regarding human rights and democratic practices; whereas rights of women form indispensable part of the human rights;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the EU, enshrined in the Treaty on European Union, and one of its objectives and tasks, and whereas the EU is also guided by this principle in its external action;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
G b. whereas the male literacy rate in the country is 82.1%, female literacy lags at 65.5% and whereas the workforce participation rate of males and females in the country is skewed at 54.4% and 21.9%, respectively; whereas rape, violence against women and domestic violence remain a serious concern in India1a; _________________ 1a http://in.one.un.org/gender-equity/
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Notes that as part of the EU-India Agenda for Action -2020, both parties should work towards reciprocal access of researchers in selected EU Horizon 2020 & Indian programmes and strengthening of dialogue and cooperation on education including through India's Global Initiative of Academic Networks (GIAN) programme and EU's Erasmus+ programme; calls for equal inclusion of female students, scientists, researchers and professionals in these programmes;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the reaffirmed commitment to increased exchanges on the human rights dimension of the EU-India Strategic Partnership, as citizens of both sides can benefit from enhanced cooperation on human rights issues; underlines, in this context, the importance of Human Rights Dialogues; notes that no exchange has taken place since 2013, and urges that a dialogue be held as soon as possible; calls for women's rights and their increased participation in decision- making processes are to be included as one of the priority areas on the agenda of the Human Rights Dialogue;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Welcomes that as part of the EU- India Agenda for Action -2020, EU and India committed to identify opportunities for strengthened cooperation and coordination in international fora, including a possible dialogue on equality between women and men; calls for the opening of such a dialogue;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23 b. Welcomes that the Government of India has stepped up efforts to introduce and integrate equality between women and men in policy programming, with initiative to save and empower the girl child, skilling and employment programmes for women, along with microfinance services for underprivileged rural women having been introduced and legislation to address sexual harassment, domestic violence and unequal remuneration also being strengthened; calls on the government of India to continue and increase these efforts;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #

2017/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
23 c. Welcomes that the EU is funding in India projects addressing violence against women and children including prevention of female foeticide; calls on the High Representative and the Commission for this funding to be maintained and for projects empowering women to be strengthened;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas equality between women and men is a key economic asset to promote fair and inclusive economic growth, and reducing occupational inequality is not just a goal in terms of equal treatment, but also in terms of labour market efficiency and fluidity;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas education, qualifications and the acquisition of skills are essential to the empowerment of women at social, cultural and economic level, and education opportunities are recognised as a core element to combat inequalities such as underrepresentation in decision- making and manager posts, engineering and science, thus improving economic empowerment for women and girls;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas violence against women is one of the main impediments to equality between women and men and be combatted through education and subsequently social and economic empowerment; whereas workplace violence has serious negative consequences for the female and male workers affected, their co-workers and families, as well as the organisations they work in and the society as a whole;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 53 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas effective work-life balance hasand family-friendly policies have positive health aspects and promotes economic growth, competitiveness, overall labour market participation, gender equality, reduction of the risk of poverty, and intergenerational solidarity, and also helps address the challenges of an aging society and positively influences birth rates intrigger positive demographic trends across the EU;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas a public systemframework of wage mapping, including data collection, might hasve the potential to put pressure on both private and public sectors to assess their payment structures and redress any gender- based differences that are found;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas trade unions have the potential to strengthen women’s economic empowerment through promoting equal pay between women and men and investing in work-life balance in their sector;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 84 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that women constitute 52% of the total European population, but only one third of the self-employed or of all business starters in the EU, facing more difficulties than men in access to finance, training, networking, and in maintaining a work-life balance;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 85 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Highlights that women's economic empowerment and equal opportunities in the labour market are not only crucial for women individually, but also instrumental for EU's economic growth with positive impact on GDP, inclusiveness and competitiveness of businesses; points out that, according to OECD projections, total convergence in participation rates would result in a 12.4% increase in per capita GDP by 2030;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 89 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses the need to combat all forms of violence against women at the workplace; calls on the Commission and the Member States to embark on concerted action, including public awareness and information campaigns, on violence against women, and to encourage the exchange of good practices;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 111 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for the adoption of the necessary measures to promote higher participation of women in the labour market in order to meet the challenges of the 21st century; welcomes in this regard the Commission proposal on work-life balance to improve the reconciliation of professional and private life, which will allow women and men to share occupational, family and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare is concerned;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 116 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that better work-life reconciliation and strengthened equality between women and men are essential for supporting and enhancing the participation of women in the labour market, in particular women-carers and single mothers, and achieving the goals of women empowerment;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 122 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. InsistsTakes note that the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value is enshrined in the EU Treaty; highlightnotes, in this context, the Commission’s recommendation on strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women through transparency;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 126 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. UrEncourages Member States and companie, companies and social partners to introduce pay transparency in order to create methods for companies to tackle the issue of the gender pay gap, including through pay audits and the inclusion of equal pay measures in collective bargaining;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 134 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Expresses its conviction that achieving equal pay for male and female workers for equal work of equal value requires a clear framework of specific job evaluation tools with comparable indicators to assess ‘value’ in jobs or sectors; invites the Commission, therefore, to delivconsider such a framework and to assist the Member States in implementing it;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 151 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Takes the view that initiatives are needed at both national and EU level to enhance female participation in male- dominated sectors and to increase the recognition of women's skills and economic performance at the workplace, so as to overcome horizontal and vertical exclusion and to increase the number of women in decision-making bodies in the political and business sphere;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 160 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines the importance of promoting gender equality in education and training related initiatives, particularly initiatives taken to alleviate gender imbalances in literacy, including media and digital literacy, also reducing the digital gap as mentioned in the Europe 2020 Digital Agenda;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 162 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Invites the Member States and the Commission to promote, through information and awareness-raising campaigns, the participation of women in sectors traditionally viewed as 'male', notably the sciences and new technologies, with a view to fully benefitting of the human capital represented by European women and hence enhancing the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy and mainstreaming gender equality in the digital agenda of the forthcoming years;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 168 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises that ensuring gender balance in collective bargaining teams is crucial tocan have positive effects in view of ensuring a bn equal ancedd appropriate representation of women and men, and therefore considers thatnotes in this regard the possible benefits of trade unions should strengthening the positions of women within the social partnership structure, in particular in decision-making roles, and should negotiateing gender equality plans at company and sectorial level;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 171 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls onEncourages the Commission to work closely with social partners in order to strengthen them in their key role of detecting invisiblediscriminatory gender bias in the setting of paywage scales and in providing job evaluations which are free of gender bias;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 198 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Maintains that current economic models and practices do not take account of gender-based differences and are not responsive to the issue of closing gender gaps; believes in this context that tax policies and spending priorities during crises must be rethought in order to take women into account as economic actors;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 204 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that women in general have careers without significant progression; calls on the Member States to encourage and support women to have successful careers, including through positive actions such as networking and mentoring programmes, as well as creating adequate conditions and having equal opportunities with men at all ages for training, advancement, re-skilling and re-training, as well as pension rights and unemployment benefits that are equal to those applicable to men;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 209 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Encourages Member States to promote measures and actions to assist and advise women who decide to become entrepreneurs, stressing that financial independence is a key to equality; calls on the Member States to encourage women entrepreneurship, facilitate access to credit, cut red tape and other obstacles to women's start-ups;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 213 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to advance their efforts in putting an end to the digital divide between men and women by increasing women's access to information society, boosting the acquisition of e-capacities and improving ICT literacy among women, with a particular focus on increasing female visibility in the digital sector;
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 214 #

2017/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Asks for a reconsideration of macroeconomic focuses in which public spending priorities are reassessed and both women and men can benefit from investment in social infrastructure;deleted
2017/05/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 2 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the joint staff working document of the European Commission on ‘gender equality and women’s empowerment: transforming lives of girls and women through the EU external relations 2016-2020’,
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 2
— having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 1325, 2242, 1820, 1888, 1889 and 1960 on women, peace and security,
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 8 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to a report done by the World Health Organization in 2013 on ‘global and regional estimates of violence against women’,
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 14 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas violence against women and girls is one of the world’s most widespread human rights violations, affecting all levels of society, regardless of age, education, income, social position or country of origin or residence, and representing a major barrier to gender equality between men and women;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas women and girls in many parts of the world continue to be victims of gender-based violence, including rape, trafficking in human beings, forced marriage, honour crimes, female genital mutilation and other violations of their fundamental rights and freedoms, their right to justice, security, dignity and psychological and physical integrity;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas sexual and reproductive health and rights are grounded in basic human rights andcare services are essential elements of human dignity and to women’s empowerment; whereas, furthermore, these have not yet been secured in all parts of the world;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas women and girls belonging to cultural, traditional, linguistic, religious, gender or sexual orientation minority groups experience multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination based on both their minority status and their gender; whereas there are no cultural, religious nor traditional justifications to violations of women’s rights;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas not all women and children who have been victim to domestic violence or sexual based crime have access to adequate support networks, mental health services or justice systems prepared to handle these types of misconducts;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, according to the World Health Organization, around 35% of women in the world have experienced physical and/or sexual violence while noting that this number is not taking into account the unreported cases by women and data that has never been collected;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly condemns the continued use of rape and other forms of sexual and gender-based violence against women and girls as a weapon of war; calls on all countries, and in particular EU Member States, which have not yet done so to develop NAPs implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1325; underlines that impunity, including among official armed forces, remains one of the obstacle to exit the vicious circle of sexual violence in some countries ; underlines that the CSDP missions, training, technical and assistance missions of the EU in third countries must contribute to combatting sexual and gender-based violence;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 44 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that women’s participation in conflict resolution talks is crucial to promote women’s rights and participation, that it is a first step to their full inclusion in the future transitional processes; asks the HR/VP to insist on women’s representation in every conflict- resolution and peace-building frameworks where the EU is represented, especially when it is in the position of mediator;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the massive movement of migrants and asylum seekers disproportionately expose women and girls to gender-based violence and gender- based discrimination in transit and destination countries; notes that some women and girls refugees and migrants are victims of sexual violence by migrant smugglers and also become victims of trafficking in human beings; calls on EU agencies and Member States law enforcement authorities to train adequately their staff to take into account the specific needs and vulnerabilities of women and girls refugees;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 65 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses that gender stereotypes are among the main reasons for violations of women’s rights and inequalities between men and women; calls on the EEAS and the European Commission to emphasise the involvement of men and boys in information and awareness- raising campaigns on women’s rights, both as targets and agent of change; notes that particular attention must be paid to constitutional, legislative or regulatory provisions which discriminate women on the basis of their sex; reiterates that child marriage, early and forced marriage and the failure to enforce a legal minimum age of marriage constitute a violation of children-s rights and an obstacle to women’s empowerment;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 72 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of enhancing women’s and girls’ access to all levels of education and removing genderany barriers to learning, as educating women and girls has proved to significantly improve their future prospects;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 88 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reaffirms that female genital mutilation is a serious violation of human rights that should be given special attention in the EU’s dialogue with third countries where the prevalence of this practice is significant; recalls that FGM has serious and lasting health consequences of women and thus on development;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 103 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly regrets women’s under- representation in political decision-making, which undermines human rights and democracy; considers that governments should aim for gender equality in democracy-building and maintenance processes; underlines that the Electoral Observation Missions’ report constitute precise guidelines for the political dialogue of the EU with third countries in order to improve women’s participation to the electoral process and to the democratic life of the country;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for analysing region specific data pertaining to gender based violence in order to better suit the actions taken for improving the conditions of women in specific regions;
2016/10/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Horizon 2020 programme (hereinafter ‘this programme’), in line with the requirements of Article 16 of its Regulation, mainstreams gender equality and the gender dimension in researchbetween women and men in research and innovation as a cross-cutting issue in each of the different parts of the work programme;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas there are three mainstreaming objectives under this programme, namely: fostering equal opportunities and gender balance in project teams; ensuring gender balance in decision-making; and integrating a gender dimension into research and innovation content, which should be qualitative ;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 8 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas research and innovation are key drivers for European economic growth, and tapping into the full potential of women's skills, knowledge and qualifications will contribute to boosting growth, jobs and European competitiveness;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that this programme provides support for research bodies in implementing gendeplans for equality plansbetween women and men; welcomes also the Commission and the European Institute for Gender Equality’s joint project aimed at creating an online tool for such gender equality plans, as a means of identifying and sharing best practices with relevant stakeholders;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 24 #

2016/2147(INI)

2 a. Notes the positive changes made in recent years in terms of equality between women and men in the fields of research, development and innovation, yet draws attention to the strong vertical and horizontal segregation in women's academic careers and the existence of cultural and institutional barriers;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that a further review is needed in order to assess the results, based also on reliable and comparable indicators such as the percentage of women participants and women project coordinators in Horizon 2020, and to propose adjustments to the specific actions if requiredcan be proposed, if required, in view of securing better results;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Requests that the Commission increase the budget for Horizon 2020 in order to boost the number of participating universities and research institutions, and calls on the Member States to facilitate access to grants for women researchers and scientists in order to foster equality in scientific careers and boost competitiveness in the EU;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to show a firmer commitment to ensuring that gender mainstreaming be further streconsider further strengthening gender mainstreaming within Horizon 2020, also supporting and reinforcing thened within Horizon 2020 dialogue between research institutions, businesses and related social partners, and calls for the development of gendetargets for equality targetsbetween women and men in strategies, programmes and projects at all stages of the research cycle;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to promote female entrepreneurship through the SME instrument, encouraging women to consider entrepreneurship as a relevant career option, by facilitating access to credit, cutting red tape and other obstacles for women's start-ups, in view of achieving smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase the number of awareness-raising and information campaigns pertaining to this programme with a view to attracting more girls into STEM fields and boosting women’s participation in research projects;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Underlines the importance of support programmes for women entrepreneurs and for women in science and academia and urges the EU to support these programmes in a more tangible manner,including through positive actions such as networking and mentoring programmes, as well as creating adequate conditions and having equal opportunities with men at all ages for training, advancement, re-skilling and re-training;
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Asks for inclusion of a robust gender equality strategystrategy on equality between women and men and measurable targets in the Framework Programme 9 proposal; considers it important to continue supporting gender equality between women and men as a cross- cutting objective, as well as a specific area eligible for funding.
2017/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that this strategy should seek to address not only the impact of the pension gap, in particular on the most vulnerable groups, but also its underlying causes; notes that preventing the gender pension gap in the future depends on ensuring that women and men enjoy equal position in the labour market in terms of the pay, career advancement and opportunities to work full time;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 135 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to work together with the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) to develop a formal and reliable indicators on the basis of which to identify the various factors behind the pension gap, as well as to monitor that gap and flag up changes of the gender pension gap both at the EU-level as well as in cooperation with the Member States at the national level and to conduct systematic monitoring of this indicator, as well as to identify the various factors behind the pension gap;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 138 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that the gender pension gap should be regarded as a key indicator of gender inequality in the labour market as it reflects accumulated disadvantages experienced by women throughout their working lives, including horizontal and vertical segregation, discontinuous career paths as well as the gender pay gap; notes that, moreover, the current level of the gender pension gap is very close to the total wage gap (40,2%) which further reaffirms that the gap in pensions accurately demonstrates the magnitude of inequality between women and men in the labour market;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 152 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU legislation against gender discrimination is properly implemented and its progress systematically monitored, with a view to making sure that men and women have an equal ability to make pension contributions;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 163 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Supports efforts to tackle horizontal and vertical segregation on the labour market by eliminating gender inequalities and discrimination in employment and encouraging women to take up jobs and careers in innovative growth sectors which are currently dominated mainly by men as a result of the persistence of stereotypes;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 194 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to make it easier for employees to negotiate voluntary flexible working arrangements giving themwomen and men a better balance between their working and private lives, so that they do not have to favour one over the other when they are obliged to take on greater responsibility for looking after homes and families;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 207 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Considers that as a principle effective policy aimed at eliminating and preventing the gender pension gap should focus on increasing women's employment and opportunities for women to make equal pension contributions as opposed to enhancing compensation mechanisms within the pension systems;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 226 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Welcomes the equalising effect on pensions of the Test-Achats ruling which prohibited sex-based actuarial factors in insurance contracts and made unisex premiums and benefits mandatory in private insurance schemes, including pensions; notes that while this ruling applies only to the private schemes, the unisex rule in pensions constitutes a good practice in terms of reducing the gender pension gap;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 228 #

2016/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Welcomes the decision of some Member States to apply the unisex rule also to their occupational pension schemes in order to ensure equality between women and men in all areas of pension calculation; encourages other Member States to consider following suit, if appropriate;
2016/10/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Acknowledges the essential role of civil society organisations and international NGOs to boost positive reforms and measures to protect women's rights and improve their participation to political and economic activities;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 27 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EaP States to promote and strengthen political participation and leadership by women; underlines that increased participation of women in administrations leading key reforms, such as anti-corruption and economic reforms, would be beneficial; welcomes all efforts aimed at reaching this goal, such as obligatory or voluntary quotas for the lists of candidates, grants, training and support provided to female politicians and activists, and mentoring programmes and awareness- raising campaigns changing the image of women in the media; remarks that in general, an increase of women's participation to the political life and to high administration of EaP countries would contribute to the renewal of the political class and thus to the ongoing political transitions;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the positive role that the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly can play to promote women's political participation and their visibility in the Eastern Partnership; welcomes the first meeting of the Euronest Women's Forum which took place in March 2016; also encourages, more generally, the creation and the support by the EU of transnational networks of women's in politics;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Encourages exchanges of best practices on the promotion of women's political participation in decentralised institutions and local authorities; also highlights that sustainable results in increasing women’s political participation are best achieved when led by political parties; therefore underlines the key role of European political parties and their women’s sections;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Recalls that EU Electoral Observation Missions and of other international electoral observation missions provide, in their reports, recommendations regarding women’s participation to the electoral process; calls on the EU to make full use of these recommendations in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Encourages further efforts towards peaceful resolution of conflicts and calls for greater involvement of women in such processes, in line with UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 2242 on Women, Peace and Security;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 77 #

2016/2060(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Welcomes the project of the Council of Europe on Improving Women's Access to Justice in Five Eastern Partnership Countries, which aims at identifying and supporting the removal of obstacles for women's equal access to justice, and strengthening the capacity of Eastern Partnership countries to design measures to ensure that the justice chain is gender-responsive, including through the training of legal professionals;
2016/10/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 1 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need to rebuildadapt and strengthen the EU-ACP relationship on fresh foundations as a fair partnership between equals, respecting countries’ heterogeneity and sovereignty; stresses that the partnership must have as its, taking account of the new challenges posed by and the new characteristics of the international environment, in particular globalisation and regionalisation; stresses that meeting the objectives of the United Nations SDGs, the meeting of basic needs and respect for human right should be at the heart of the partnership; stresses that the new SDG approach can help us to get past the donor-receiver paradigm in ACP-EU relations;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Draws attention to the vital importance of consistency between the Union’s external policies and of consistency between the objectives of its internal and external policies, in particular in the areas of trade, agriculture, the environment, energy, security and migration; adds that it is still important that the countries in the ACP group should take full ownership of the ACP-EU partnership and that the review should give the partnership fresh political impetus, over and above any technical or institutional adjustments required;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the negative effects ofat the association agreements on the economies of ACP countries; takes the view that the new partnership will need to be based on developing the countries’ productive capacities, completing the most advantageous regional integration processes, protecting traditional agriculture, and combating land grabbing, the privatisation of national natural resources and public services, and over-exploitationwith ACP countries contribute to regional integration processes, to achieving development objectives and to promoting human rights, the rule of law and good governance; calls, therefore, for human rights clauses to be incorporated into these agreements; stresses the importance of ensuring that there is greater transparency in the negotiations on these agreements and proper monitoring of their implementation, so that they can contribute effectively to meeting development objectives;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Is convinced that the review of the ACP-EU partnership should take account of the growing importance of regionalisation in order to avoid simply imposing a Union political framework; emphasises that it is crucial that the countries which make up the ACP group should play a full part, as a group and as regions, in the review process; emphasises, in that connection, the role of regional organisations, such as the African Union or the African regional economic communities;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b.Calls for the political dimension of the ACP-EU partnership to be strengthened, in particular with a view to carrying out joint actions and exerting greater influence in international forums;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Invites ACP countries to audit their debts with a view to their complete elimination, and invites them to claim reparations for the spoliation of natural resources by foreign multinationals, and for the wars that have been sparked; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring; stresses that eradicating poverty requires the emergence of a dynamic private sector that will foster sustainable economic development; points out that, without respect for the rule of law and functioning political institutions, the private sector will not be able to achieve this goal;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the universality of the human rights enshrined in international law,ACP-EU cooperation should be stepped up in areas of common interest such as security, conflict prevention including intern relational law on migrants and refugees, must be respected, along with the Geneva Convention; urge to reducing hunger and the effects of climate change, human rights, the rule of law and democracy; points countries to ratify the United Nations Convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their familiest in this connection that the possibilities for political dialogue within the framework of Articles 8 and 96 of the Cotonou agreement have not been fully exploited by either the EU or the ACP side; highlights the important role of the ACP- EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in this context;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that a stable security environment is an essential pre-condition if the sustainable development goals are to be achieved; supports, to this end, the creation of a financial instrument dedicated to security and peace within the framework of the future EU-ACP partnership;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Supports the decision by the United Nations to create a legal instrument to ensure that businesses respect human rights, in order to put an end to labour exploitation, neo-slavery, illicit capital flows and the financing of armed conflicts;deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for the inclusion of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the review of the ACP-EU cooperation framework as a single, universal set of development goals applicable to all; believes that the joint ACP-EU Council should give concrete recommendations on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the framework of the ACP-EU cooperation;
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of putting an end to foreign interference in the internal affairs of ACP countries, and to neocolonial policies; supports the idea of dismantling all foreign military bases.deleted
2016/06/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of gender-equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes; urges, however, the consistent use of gender budgeting, including quantifiable budget allocations and results indicators in order to rectify the imbalances between men and women; stresses the need to support young women who can face gender-specific obstacles to get good quality offers of employment, continued education, apprenticeships or traineeships; notes that more funds should be allocated for women and girls who would like to start up their own business and for entrepreneurship;
2016/07/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that jobs, growth and investments remain the overarching priority of the 2017 EU budget; draws attention to the existing gender-related targets in the Europe 2020 strategy, namely increasing female employment to 75 % and achieving equal pay between women and men, gender equality in the membership of national parliaments and an equal number of women on large company boards, all of which we are a long way from reaching; notes, in this regard, that more funds should be allocated to increase women participation in ICT sector which offer several opportunities;
2016/07/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the 2017 budget tries to provide an effective European response to the migration challenge; stresses the need to assign funds for providing specific assistance to, and promoting inclusion and monitoring the situation of, female refugees and asylum seekers in the EU; believes that, in particular, tailored facilities should be put in place in order to create suitable areas for mothers and children, and special attention should be given to women and girls victims of violence, including FGM;
2016/07/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the joint staff working document of the European Commission on "Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming lives of girls and women through the EU external relations 2016-2020",
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 b (new)
- having regard to UN Security Council Resolution on women, peace and security and subsequent resolutions2242, 1820, 1888, 1889 and 1960,
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the Sahel region and other connected geographical areas represent priority regions to ensure the security of the European Union; whereas the EU Strategy for Security and Development in the Sahel has been confirmed and renewed in 2015;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that there is still too much costly and inefficient overlapping in activities carried out in all policy areas of the external action between Member States and between Member States and the EU; urges the EU to undertake a genuine and comprehensive effort to map all Member States activities in different policy areas in third countries and underlines that EU Delegations would be at the forefront of this effort; calls on the EU Delegations to implement joint programming in all external action policy areas as to avoid duplication, safe money, enhance efficiency and detect possible gaps;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Is convinced that in view of an already underfinanced EU budget, additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects under the Common Security and Defence Policy, additional funding from the Member States is also needed; believes that Member States should seize the opportunity of the current revision/review of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) to that end; underlines that better coordination and reduced overlapping of EU's and Member States' activities would enable savings and reallocation of funds;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 244 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recognises the increasing interdependence between internal and external security, and takes the view that the current security challenges require a profound overhaul of our security policies with a view to creating a consistent and unified policy covering both internal and external dimensions, including aspects such as counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, energy security, hybrid threats, strategic communication, and critical infrastructures; urges Member States’ security services to enhance coordination, and calls on all Member States to comply with their legal obligation to share intelligence with Europol and Eurojust in the fight against terrorism and organised crime and to make sure that their security services are adequately trained and have sufficient human and technical resources to process and analyse information exchanged; urges the EU to further strengthen its cooperation with third countries in the fight against terrorism;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 267 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Recognises the strategic partnership in peacekeeping and crisis management between the EU and UN since 2003; welcomes the systematic cooperation at strategic and operational level and consultation and coordination mechanisms; encourages EU to tackle challenges such as joint strategic planning, division of labour, joint review and coordination of exit strategies; encourage the EU and its Member States to support UN peacekeeping and to cooperate with the UN in strengthening the peacekeeping capacities of regional organisations, particularly the African Union and taking into account the African Peace Facility;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 344 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that a deepening of the relationship with the US and Canada is of strategic interest to the EU, while at the same time it is important for the EU to strengthen its relationship with Central and South America; and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 377 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Is convinced that the reinforcement of capacities of regional and sub-regional organisations, in particular in Africa, is crucial with regard to conflict prevention, conflict resolution and security cooperation;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 460 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines the importance of the participation of women in foreign policy- making and the need to promote the role of women in peace efforts, notably the implementation of the UNSC Resolution on Women, Peace and Security and the improvement of EU's internal gender balance in its external policy; underlines that women's participation in conflict resolution talks is crucial to promote women's rights and participation, that it is a first step to their full inclusion in the future transitional processes; ask the HR/VP to insist on women's representation in every conflict-resolution and peace-building frameworks where the EU is represented, especially when it is in the position of mediator;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 462 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Recognizes that early preventative actions against long-term risks for violent conflict and/or deterioration in a country or region are more effective, less time- consuming and less expensive than peacekeeping operations; urges for EU to show political leadership to involve in preventive diplomacy and conflict mediation; underlines the key role of EU delegations in monitoring developments and providing early warnings; welcomes in this regard the role of the EU Conflict Early Warning System, the EEAS Mediation Support Team and the European Institute of Peace; calls on the further development of the EU conflict prevention and mediation capacities;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas the work of the European Network of Equality Bodies is crucial for enhancing implementation of equal treatment legislation as well as coordinating the cooperation and sharing of best practices between national equality bodies accords the EU;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes note that while the Commission report states that no specific difficulties have been signalled in implementing several provisions of the Directive, this statement is based on very few cases of discrimination reported, and that overall there is very limited information and that data collection in this area varies considerably at Member State level; calls on the Members States, the Commission and the relevant stakeholders to raise the awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that only some Member States reported the existence of specific provisions on positive action; calls on the Member States to better integrate and promote provisions on positive action which is based on a legitimate aim and strives to prevent or compensate gender- based inequalities, as outlined in the Directive;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 63 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines thatHighlights that while the Directive expressly prohibits the use of pregnancy and maternity as a way to differentiate in the calculation of premiums and benefits for the purposes of insurance and related financial services, a greater effort needs to be made to protect the rights of pregnant women in this field and safeguard them against unqualified pregnancy-related costs, as well as to raisinge awareness among service providers as to the special protection afforded to pregnant women; in particular there is a need to ensure that transitional periods in different types of insurance, especially medical insurance, do not interfere with the rights of pregnant women to enjoy equal treatment throughout the period of pregnancy;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 68 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the equalising effect on pensions of the Test-Achats ruling which prohibited sex-based actuarial factors in insurance contracts and made unisex premiums and benefits mandatory in private insurance schemes, including pensions; notes that while this ruling applies only to the private schemes, the unisex rule in pensions constitutes a good practice in terms of reducing the gender pension gap;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 78 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that the Istanbul Convention states that “the realisation of de jure and de facto equality between women and men is a key element in the prevention of violence against women” and, therefore, calls on the Member States and the Commission to follow this comprehensive approach in their policy aimed at eradicating violence against women, including the implementation of the anti- harassment provisions outlined in the Directive;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 81 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights that equal treatment of both mothers and fathers with small children in the access and use of services is crucial for gender equality in general as it promotes equal and shared responsibility for childcare between women and men; calls therefore on the Member States to raise awareness among the service providers about the need for equal facilities for both parents available within their premises;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 82 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that integrating the gender- sensitive perspective into the early stages of planning and structuring of the means of transport and other public spaces constitutes a good and cost-efficient practice for eradicating physical barriers which undermine equal access for parents and carers of small children;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 92 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes that harassment poses a particular challenge for gender equality in the area of collaborative economy services; highlights that whilst the "zero- tolerance" policy towards harassment adopted by many platforms constitutes a good practice to be further strengthened in the sector, there is a need for the platforms concerned to prioritise prevention of harassment as well as to consider creating clear procedures for reporting abuse cases for users;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 95 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that while the recently published Communication from the Commission on "European agenda for the collaborative economy" is a good starting step for promoting and regulating this sector effectively, in its further stages the Commission should integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 97 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Encourages equality bodies and consumer protection organisations to both raise awareness about the limits and conditions for differential treatment among the service providers as well as to enhance awareness about the rights for equal treatment among service users, as it is often reported that users are not familiar with applicable provisions in the field of goods and services;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to enhance the cooperation with equality bodies and to monitor if the relevant provisions regarding their competences are met in all the Member States as well as to provide support to Member States in systematically identifying the main challenges and share best practices;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 117 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the equality bodies, potentially in cooperation with consumer protection organizations, to raise awareness about the provisions of the Directive among both service providers and users in order to boost the understanding of equal treatment in this field and reduce breaches of the Directive being left unreported;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2016/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to establish a public database of relevant legislation and case law regarding equal treatment between women and men as a means to raise awareness about the application of the legal provisions in this field;
2016/11/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Regrets that gender equality has not yet been reached in many areas; stresses that women still suffer from discrimination as exemplified by their low representation in the decision-making process, both in the private and the public sectors, and by the persisting gender pay gapscience, technologies and engineering, entrepreneurship and decision-making process, and by the persisting gender pay and pension gap, emphasises that women and girls, especially the ones living in rural areas, are particularly affected by poverty;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the proposed EU accession to the Istanbul Convention and calls for the EU and the Member States to ratify the Istanbul Convention as soon as possiblon preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence and calls on Member States to protect, prevent and eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls and domestic violence;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that violence against women, such as honour killing, forced marriage, trafficking, female genital mutilation, domestic violence are serious violations of human rights that should be criminalised and punished and never be justified by religious or cultural tradition.
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 65 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that all those living in Europe, regardless of their original culture and tradition, should respect the law and women’s rights and dignity;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Strongly condemns the frequent acts of harassment and rape in public places in Europe and considers that every women and girl should feel safe from any form of sexual harassment in any public place in Europe; calls on Member States to take the necessary measures to ensure that these acts are properly sanctioned, that the perpetrators are brought to justice and that appropriate protection is provided to victims;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Stresses that in order to effectively combat gender-based violence, a change of attitude towards women and girls is necessary; they are too often represented in subordinate roles and violence against them is too often tolerated or undermined; calls on Member States to do more to combat gender based stereotypes and discrimination against women and girls;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 89 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Member States to fully implement Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings as well as well Directive 2011/92/EU on combating child sexual abuse and exploitation in order to prevent women and girls from trafficking, violence and sexual exploitation;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 94 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Member States to fully implement Directive 2012/29/EU on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime and Directive 2011/99/EU on the European order to ensure appropriate protection and assistance to women and girls victims of violence.
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 107 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is concerned by the increase of cyber violence against women and girls, as well as the use of ICT and Internet for trafficking in women and children, especially for sexual, reproductive and labour exploitation; calls for the Commission and the Member States to adopt measures to prevent and address the use of new technologies as a tool of recruiting particularly women and girls victims of trafficking in human beings, cyber-harassment and cyber stalking;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 124 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to take all the necessary measures to ensure the protection of women migrantrefugees and asylum seekers, such as safe spaces for women and children, legal counselling and access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including safe abortionstailored facilities, suitable areas for mothers and children, special attention to women and girls victims of violence, including but not limited to FGM;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 150 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to introduce gender mainstreaming in all areas of postep up its work on equalicty makingbetween women and imen all proposed legislation, including systematic gender impact assessments as part of the fundamental rights compliance assessmentnd to incorporate visible equality perspective into EU activities and policies;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 165 #

2016/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to introduce a gender equality pillar into the Europe 2020 strategy and for greater inclusion of the gender mainstreaming perspective in the European Semester by introducing a gender dimension in the annual growth survey and in the formulation process of the CSRsmutually reinforce the Europe 2020 strategy and the Strategy for equality between women and men;
2016/07/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 320 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 269 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point ja (new)
3a. In Article 46(2), the following point is added: ja) land left fallow for melliferous plants (pollen and nectar rich species).
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 402 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 269 – paragraph 1 – point 6 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Annex X – Line 20 a (new)
6b. In Annex X, the following line is to be added after the last line: Features: land left fallow for melliferous plants (pollen and nectar rich species) Conversion factor: n/a Weighting factor: 2 Ecological focus area: 2 m2
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 135 #

2016/0225(COD)

(8) Building on the existing initiatives, a stable and reliable Union Resettlement Framework should be established for the resettlement of persons in need of international protection to be implemented in accordance with annual Union resettlement plans and targeted Union resettlement schemes which effectively deliver on Member States' concrete commitments. Member States’ participation should be voluntary.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 160 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to reduce divergences among the national resettlement practices and procedures, a common standard procedures and common eligibility criteria and exclusion grounds for the selection should be laid down, as well as a common protection status to be granted to resettled persons.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 165 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The common standard procedures should build on the existing resettlement experience and standards of the Member States, in particular the Standard Operating Procedures guiding the implementation of the resettlement scheme with Turkey set out in the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016. The Union Resettlement Framework should allow the use of two types of standard resettlement procedures.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 169 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Both types ofThe procedure consists of the following stages: identification, registration, assessment and decision. It allows for a full assessment of the international protection needs of third- country nationals or stateless persons.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 171 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) An ordinary procedure should be established allowing for a full assessment of the international protection needs of third-country nationals or stateless persons.deleted
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 174 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) An expedited procedure should be established with the same level of security checks as in the ordinary procedure. However, in the expedited procedure, the assessment of the international protection needs of third-country nationals or stateless persons should be limited to an assessment of their eligibility for subsidiary protection without assessing their qualification for refugee status.deleted
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 178 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The resettlement procedure should be concluded as soon as possible in order to discourage persons in need of international protection to use irregular ways to enter the European Union to seek protection. At the same time it should ensure that Member States have sufficient time for a full and adequate examination of each case. The time-limits should correspond to what is necessary to make the different types of assessment foreseen for the ordinary and expedited procedure.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 191 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The choice of the resettlement procedure should be made for each targeted Union resettlement scheme. An expedited procedure might be warranted on humanitarian grounds or in case of urgent legal or physical protection needs.deleted
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 199 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to allow for supplementing the rules which govern the procedure to be applied in targeted Union resettlement schemes, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to adapt the procedure to the circumstances in the third country from which resettlement takes place such as determining that third country’s role in the procedure. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201633. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 33 OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1. OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 204 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Union Resettlement Framework, implementing powers should be conferred on the Council for establishing the annual Union resettlement plan, fixing the maximum total number of persons to be resettled, the details about the voluntary participation of the Member States in the plan and their contributions to the total number of persons to be resettled, as well as overall geographical priorities.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 216 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Union Resettlement Framework, the Commission should be empowered to establish targeted Union resettlement schemes laying down the precise number out of the total number of persons to be resettled and the voluntary participation of the Member State, consistent with the annual Union Resettlement plan. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers34. The examination procedure should be used for establishing targeted Union resettlement schemes given that those schemes have substantial implications. The Commission should aim to establish targeted Union resettlement schemes as soon as possible after the adoption of the annual Union resettlement plan and whenever necessary during the period covered by the annual Union resettlement plan. The Commission should take into account the discussions within the High-Level Resettlement Committee. _________________ 34 OJ L 55, 28/02/2011, p. 13. OJ L 55, 28/02/2011, p. 13.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 217 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Each targeted Union resettlement scheme should determine which standard procedural rules should apply to its implementation. It should in addition set out local cooperation arrangements where and as appropriate to facilitate its implementation.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 240 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) This Regulation does not affect the ability of the Member States to adopt or implement national resettlement schemes, which do not jeopardise the attainment of the Union’s objectives under this Regulation, for example where they contribute an additional number of resettlement places to targeted Union resettlement schemes established under this Regulation going beyond their contribution to the maximum number of persons to be resettled under the annual Union resettlement placontribute to targeted Union resettlement schemes established under this Regulation.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 250 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States’ participation in implementing the Union Resettlement Framework shall be voluntary.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 251 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 b (new)
This Regulation shall not give third- country nationals or stateless persons a subjective right to be resettled.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 256 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
For the purposes of this Regulation ‘resettlement’ means the admission of third-country nationals and stateless persons in need of international protection from a third country to which or within which they have been displaced to the territory of the Member States with a view to granting them international protection.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 306 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) reducing the number of third- country nationalsnationals of that country and other third countries, and of stateless persons, coming from that country and irregularly crossing the border into the territory of the Member States coming from that third country;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 321 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point а – introductory part
(i) third-country nationals, who, owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group, are outside the country of nationality or the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, and are unable or, owing to such fear, are unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country, or stateless persons, who, being outside of the country of former habitual residence or of the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, for the same reasons as mentioned above, are unable or, owing to such fear, unwilling to return to or stay in it, or, failing that,
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 325 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point а – point ii
(ii) third-country nationals, who are outside the country of nationality or the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, or stateless persons, who are outside of the country of former habitual residence or of the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, and in respect of whom substantial grounds have been shown for believing that they, if returned to or staying in their country of origin or former habitual residence, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm, and are unable, or, owing to such risk, are unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 347 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i – indent 6
– persons with socio-economic vulnerability;deleted
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 379 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point а – point ii
(ii) (ii) they have committed a serious crime, including terrorism, regardless of whether this is within the European Union or in a third country;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 390 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) persons who are registered in the Entry/Exit system as having overstayed their set period residence in the territory of the European Union in the five years prior to resettlement;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 398 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) persons whom a Member State has, during the last five years prior to resettlement, refused to grant international protection;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 399 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(eb) persons who, in the last five years prior to resettlement, have been returned – either voluntarily or by force – under readmission agreements;;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 408 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point е – paragraph 1 a (new)
persons who, during the last five years prior to resettlement, have refused resettlement to a particular Member State;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 432 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) details about the voluntary participation of the Member States in the annual Union resettlement plan and their contributions to the total number of persons to be resettled;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 452 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point е
(е) whether the ordinary procedure set out in Article 10 or the expedited procedure set out in Article 11 shall be applied specifying where necessary how the identification and assessment of third- country nationals or stateless persons shall be carried out and the timeframe for taking decisions on resettlement;deleted
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 459 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Ordinary pProcedure
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 471 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the fingerprints of all fingers, which should be entered in Eurodac, and a facial image of every third-country national or stateless person of at least six years of age;
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 490 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. Where a negative decision is taken, no resettlement of the person concerned shall occur. A negative decision by a Member State is not open to judicial or administrative appeal.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 496 #

2016/0225(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – point c
(c) where possible, offer a pre- departure orientation programme to third- country nationals or stateless persons, which may include information about their rights and obligations, language classes, and information about the Member State's social, cultural and political set-up.
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 503 #

2016/0225(COD)

Where the Commission implementing act adopting a targeted Union resettlement scheme provides for an expedited procedure, and by way of derogation from Article 10, Member States: (1) country nationals or the stateless persons meet the requirements referred to in point (a)(i) of Article 5; (2) whether the third-country nationals or the stateless persons qualify as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the 1951 Geneva Convention; (3) resettlement as soon as possible and not later than four months from a third- country national's registration referred to in Article 10(2); the Member States may extend that time-limit of four months by a period of not more than two months, where complex issues of fact or law are involved. (4) nationals or the stateless persons concerned subsidiary protection status. The subsidiary protection status granted on the basis of point (4) shall be considered to have been terminated where a final decision has been taken on an application for international protection made by the beneficiary of that status.Article 11 deleted Expedited procedure shall not assess whether the third- shall not require UNHCR to assess shall take a decision on shall grant the third-country
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 523 #

2016/0225(COD)

3. To implement targeted Union resettlement schemes, and in particularf need be to conduct pre-departure orientation programmes, fit-to-travel medical checks, travel arrangements and other practical arrangements, Member States may be assisted by partners in accordance with local coordination and practical cooperation arrangements for targeted Union resettlement schemes established in accordance with point (d) of Article 8(2).
2017/05/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 158 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The aim should be to create a database of talented persons selected on account of recognition of their qualifications, their experience or the interest they have expressed in a particular sector. The database should be accessible to European businesses.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 260 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) Existing legal uncertainty surrounding business trips of highly skilled workers should be addressed by defining this notion and setting a list of activities that in any case should be considered as business activities in all Member States. Second Member States should not be allowed to require from EU Blue Card holders engaging in business activities a work permit or any other authorisation than the EU Blue Card issued by the first Member State. Where the EU Blue Card is issued by a Member State not applying the Schengen acquis in full, its holder should be entitled to enter and stay in one or several second Member States for the purpose of business activity for up to 90 days in any 180-day period based on the EU Blue Card, in accordance with the rules laid down in this directive and the Schengen Borders Code.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 332 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall not issue any other permit thangive preference for the issue of an EU Blue Card to third-country nationals for the purpose of highly skilled employment.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 334 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. When transposing this Directive the Member States shall, where appropriate in consultation with the social partners, list those sectors of employment which face shortages of highly skilled workers. The Member States may modify that list, where appropriate in consultation with the social partners. The Member States shall inform the Commission of such modifications.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 407 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States mayshall reject an application for an EU Blue Card where:
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 436 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) where appropriate, where the third Country national has failed to meet its obligations regarding social security, taxation or labour law;
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 443 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) where the third-country national fails to comply with the conditions of mobility under this Chapter or repetitively makes use of the mobility provisions of this Chapter in an abusive manner.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 472 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall determine whetherallow applications for an EU Blue Card are to be made by the third-country national or by the employer. Member States may also allow an application from either of the two.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 499 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The recognition procedures shall not entail disproportionate or excessive administrative burden or costs for the employers, in particular for SMEs.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 612 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 7
7. Where the EU Blue Card holder or his or her family members cross the external border of a Member State applying the Schengen acquis in full, that Member State shall consult the Schengen information systemrelevant databases, in particular the Schengen information system, in accordance with the Schengen Borders Code. That Member State shall refuse entry for persons for whom an alert for the purposes of refusing entry and stay has been issued in the Schengen information system.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 627 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Annually, and for the first time by …52 at the latest, Member States shall, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 862/200753, communicate to the Commission statistics on the numbers of third-country nationals who have been granted an EU Blue Card and on those whose application have been rejected, specifying those rejected in application of Article 6(2), as well as on the numbers of third-country nationals whose EU Blue Card has been renewed or withdrawn, during the previous calendar year. Those statistics shall be disaggregated by the citizenship, occupation, length of validity of the permits, sex and age of the applicants, area of activity and the economic sector. Those statistics for third- country nationals who have been granted an EU Blue Card shall be further disaggregated into beneficiaries of international protection, beneficiaries of the right to free movement and those who have acquired EU long-term resident status in accordance with Article 17. _________________ 52 Four years after the date of entry into force of this Directive. 53 Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 311/76 on the compilation of statistics on foreign workers (OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p. 23).
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 131 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The European Union Agency for Asylum should provide adequate support in the implementation of this Regulation, in particular by establishing the reference key for the distribution of asylum seekers under the corrective allocation mechanism, and by adapting the figures underlying the reference key annually, as well as the reference key based on Eurostat data.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 133 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The European Union Agency for Asylum should provide adequate support in the implementation of this Regulation, in particular by establishing the reference key for the distribution of asylum seekers under the corrective allocation mechanism, and by adapting the figures underlying the reference key annually, as well as the reference key based on Eurostat data. The European Union Agency for Asylum should provide up-to-date information about third countries, particularly countries of origin of asylum seekers.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 143 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to prevent that applicants with inadmissible claims or who are likely not to be in need of international protection, or who represent a security risk are transferred among the Member States, it is necessary to ensure that the Member where an application is first lodged verifies the admissibility of the claim in relation to the first country of asylum and safe third country, examines in accelerated procedures applications made by applicants coming from a safe country of origin designated on the EU list, as well as applicants presenting security concerns.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 177 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure that the aims of this Regulation are achieved and obstacles to its application are prevented, in particular in order to avoid absconding and secondary movements between Member States, it is necessary to establish clear obligations to be complied with by the applicant in the context of the procedure, of which he or she should be duly informed in a timely manner. Violation of those legal obligations should lead to appropriate and proportionate procedural consequences for the applicant and to appropriate and proportionate consequences in terms of his or her reception conditions. In line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Member State where such an applicant is present should in any case ensure that the immediate material needs of that person are covered.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 195 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The Member State which is determined as responsible under this Regulation should remain responsible for examination of each and every application of that applicant, including any subsequent application, in accordance with Article 40, 41 and 42 of Directive 2013/32/EU, irrespective of whether the applicant has left or was removed from the territories of the Member States. Provisions in Regulation (EU) 604/2013 which had provided for the cessation of responsibility in certain circumstances, including when deadlines for the carrying out of transfers had elapsed for a certain period of time, had created an incentive for absconding, and should therefore be removed.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 229 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) A key based on the size of the population and of the economy of the Member States should be applied as a point of reference in the operation of the corrective allocation mechanism in conjunction with a threshold, so as to enable the mechanism to function as a means of assisting Member States under disproportionate pressure. The application of the corrective allocation for the benefit of a Member State should be triggered automatically where the number of applications for international protection for which a Member State is responsible exceeds 15075% of the figure identified in the reference key. In order to comprehensively reflect the efforts of each Member State, the number of persons effectively resettled to that Member State should be added to the number of applications for international protection for the purposes of this calculation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 257 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) AIn cases where there is an immediate threat to national security, a Member State of allocation may decide not to accept the allocated applicants during a twelve months-period, in which case it should enter this information in the automated system and notify the other Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum. Thereafter the applicants that would have been allocated to that Member State should be allocated to the other Member States instead. The Member State which temporarily does not take part in the corrective allocation should make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250,000 per applicant not accepted to the Member State that was determined as responsible for examining those applications. The Commission should lay down the practical modalities for the implementation of the solidarity contribution mechanism in an implementing act. The European Union Agency for Asylum will monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidaritysuch opt- outs from the corrective allocation mechanism.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 268 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) A network of competent Member State authorities should be set up and facilitated by the European Union Agency for Asylum to enhance practical cooperation and information sharing on all matters related to the application of this Regulation, including the development of practical tools and guidance. That network should promote the exchange of best practices concerning the examination of an asylum application by the competent authorities of Member States under this Regulation and initiate the training of the employees of those authorities.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 269 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) The operation of the Entry/Exit System (EES), as established by Regulation (EU) ..../... of the European Parliament and of the Council1a , should facilitate the application of this Regulation. _________________ 1a Regulation (EU) ..../... of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes and amending Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 324 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – indent 5
- the sibling or siblings of the applicant, where the proof of the relationship is provided;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 355 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Where no Member State responsible can be designated on the basis of the criteria listed in this Regulation, the first Member State in which the application for international protection was lodged shall be responsible for examining it.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 366 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Any Member State shall retain the right to send an applicant to a safe third country, subject to the rules and safeguards laid down in Directive 2013/32/EU.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 368 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Before applying the criteria for determining a Member State responsible in accordance with Chapters III and IV, the first Member State in which the application for international protection was lodged shall: (a) examine whether the application for international protection is inadmissible pursuant to Article 33(2) letters b) and c) of Directive 2013/32/EU when a country which is not a Member State is considered as a first country of asylum or as a safe third country for the applicant; and (b) examine the application in accelerated procedure pursuant to Article 31(8) of Directive 2013/32/EU when the following grounds apply: (i) the applicant has the nationality of a third country, or he or she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country, designated as a safe country of origin in the EU common list of safe countries of origin established under Regulation [Proposal COM (2015) 452 of 9 September 2015]; or (ii) the applicant may, for serious reasons, be considered a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State, or the applicant has been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of public security or public order under national law.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 378 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Where the Member State considers an application inadmissible or examines an application in accelerated procedure pursuant to paragraph 3, that Member State shall be considered the Member State responsible.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 386 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. The Member State which has examined an application for international protection, including in the cases referred to in paragraph 3, shall be responsible for examining any further representations or a subsequent application of that applicant in accordance with Article 40, 41 and 42 of Directive 2013/32/EU, irrespective of whether the applicant has left or was removed from the territories of the Member States.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 396 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where a person who intends to make an application for international protection has entered irregularly into the territory of thea Member States, the application shall be made in theat Member State of that first entry. Where a person who intends to make an application for international protection is already legally present in a Member State, the application shall be made in that Member State.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 404 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The applicant shall submit as soon as possible and at the latest during the interview pursuant to Article 7, all the elements and information relevant for determiningquired by the Member State responsible and cooperate with the competent authorities of the Member States.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 412 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State in which the applicant is obliged to be present shall continue the procedures for determining the Member State responsible even when the applicant leaves the territory of that Member State without authorisation or is otherwise not available for the competent authorities of that Member State. The competent authorities of that Member State shall inform the European Union Agency for Asylum thereof in a timely manner and shall introduce relevant information into the automated system referred to in Article 44(1) where the applicant has left the territory of that Member State.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 592 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Where it is established, on the basis of proof or circumstantial evidence as described in the two lists mentioned in Article 25(4) of this Regulation, including the data referred to in Regulation [Proposal for a Regulation recasting Regulation (EU) No 603/2013], that an applicant has irregularly crossed the border into a Member State by land, sea or air having come from a third country, the Member State thus enteredentered the Union by land, sea or air, the Member State of the applicant's first application for international protection shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 615 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
By way of derogation from Article 3(1) and only as long as no Member State has been determined as responsible , each Member State may decide to examine an application for international protection lodged with it by a third-country national or a stateless person based on family grounds in relation to wider family not covered by Article 2(g) , even if such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in this Regulation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 624 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) take back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 26 and 30, an applicant whose application is under examination and who made an application in another Member State or who is on the territory of another Member State without a residence document;deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 625 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) take back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 26 and 30, a third- country national or a stateless person who has withdrawn the application under examination and made an application in another Member State or who is on the territory of another Member State without a residence document;deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 627 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) take back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 26 and 30, a third- country national or a stateless person whose application has been rejected and who made an application in another Member State or who is on the territory of another Member State without a residence document;deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 631 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) take back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 26 and 30 a beneficiary of international protection, who made an application in another Member State than the Member State responsible which granted that protection status or who is on the territory of another Member State than the Member State responsible which granted that protection without a residence document.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 640 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 5
5. In a situation referred to in point (d) of paragraph 1, the decision taken by the responsible authority of the Member State responsible to reject the application shall no longer be subject to a remedy within the framework of Chapter V of Directive 2013/32/EU.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 645 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Cessation of responsibilities The obligations set out in Article 20 shall cease if the Member State responsible can establish that the person concerned has left its territory voluntarily for more than three months or in compliance with a return decision or removal order issued following the withdrawal or rejection of the application. An application that is lodged after the applicant has been absent for such a period or has been effectively removed shall be regarded as a new application giving rise to a new procedure for determining the Member State responsible.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 650 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5
5. An applicant who is present in another Member State without a residence document or who there lodges an application for international protection after withdrawing his or her first application made in a different Member State during the process of determining the Member State responsible shall be taken back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 26 and 30, by the Member State with which that application for international protection was first lodged.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 660 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. Where a hit in Eurodac indicates that the applicant has previously lodged an application for international protection before having left or having been removed from the territories of the Member States, the Member State with which the new application is lodged shall also indicate which Member State has been the Member State responsible for examining the previous application.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 664 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The Member State with which the application is lodged shall search the EES pursuant to Article 25b of Regulation (EU) ..../... [EES Regulation, 2016/0106(COD)] with a view to facilitating the application of this Regulation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 673 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) in case of the indication of a previous application for international protection by the same applicant pursuant to Article 22(4), the Member State who was responsible for that previous application;deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 698 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 6 – section 4
Procedures for take back notifications Submitting a take back notification 1. In a situation referred to in Article 20(1)(b), (c), (d) or (e) the Member State where the person is present shall make a take back notification at the latest within two weeks after receiving the Eurodac hit, and transfer that person to the Member State responsible . 2. A take back notification shall be made using a standard form and shall include proof or circumstantial evidence as described in the two lists mentioned in Article 25(4) and/or relevant elements from the statements of the person concerned. 3. The Member State responsible shall confirm immediately the receipt of the notification to the Member State which made the notification. 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt uniform conditions for the preparation and submission of take back notifications . Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 56(2).deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 722 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Where the applicant or another person referred to in Article 20(1) (c), (d) or (e) is to be taken back, the Member State where the person concerned is present shall notify the person concerned in writing without undue delay the decision to transfer him or her to the Member State responsible.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 790 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 applies where the automated system referred to in Article 44(1) indicates that the number of applications for international protection for which a Member State is responsible under the criteria in Chapter III, Articles 3(2) or (3), 18 and 19, in addition to the number of persons effectively resettled, is higher than 15075% of the reference number for that Member State as determined by the key referred to in Article 35.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 823 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the size of the active population (250 % weighting);
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 827 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the total GDP (250% weighting);
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 832 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) number of migrants already living in the Member State;
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 838 #

2016/0133(COD)

(bb) the average unemployment rate during the preceding 12 months (25% weighting)
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 840 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) GDP growth rate during the preceding 12 months (25% weighting)
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 872 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
1. A Member State may, at the end of the three-month period after the entry into force of this Regulation and at the end of each twelve-month period thereafter, enter in the automated system that it will temporarily not take part in the corrective allocation mechanism set out in Chapter VII of this Regulation as a Member State of allocation and notify this to the Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum. 2. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall in that case apply the reference key during this twelve-month period to those Member States with a number of applications for which they are the Member States responsible below their share pursuant to Article 35(1), with the exception of the Member State which entered the information, as well as the benefitting Member State. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall count each application which would have otherwise been allocated to the Member State which entered the information pursuant to Article 36(4) for the share of that Member State. 3. At the end of the twelve-month period referred to in paragraph 2, the automated system shall communicate to the Member State not taking part in the corrective allocation mechanism the number of applicants for whom it would have otherwise been the Member State of allocation. That Member State shall thereafter make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250,000 per each applicant who would have otherwise been allocated to that Member State during the respective twelve-month period. The solidarity contribution shall be paid to the Member State determined as responsible for examining the respective applications. 4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt a decision in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 56, lay down the modalities for the implementation of paragraph 3. 5. The European Union Agency for Asylum shall monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidarity mechanism.Article 37 deleted Financial solidarity
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 882 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – title
Financial solidarityOpt-out mechanism
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 890 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. A Member State may, at the end of the three-month period afIf there is an immediater the entry into force of this Regulation and at the end of each twelve-month period thereafter,reat to its national security, a Member State may enter in the automated system that it will temporarily not take part in the corrective allocation mechanism set out in Chapter VII of this Regulation as a Member State of allocation and notify this to the Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 895 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall in that case apply the reference key during this twelve-monthe opt-out period to those Member States with a number of applications for which they are the Member States responsible below their share pursuant to Article 35(1), with the exception of the Member State which entered the information, as well as the benefitting Member State. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall count each application which would have otherwise been allocated to the Member State which entered the information pursuant to Article 36(4) for the share of that Member State.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 901 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. At the end of the twelve-month period referred to in paragraph 2, the automated system shall communicate to the Member State not taking part in the corrective allocation mechanism the number of applicants for whom it would have otherwise been the Member State of allocation. That Member State shall thereafter make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250,000 per each applicant who would have otherwise been allocated to that Member State during the respective twelve-month period. The solidarity contribution shall be paid to the Member State determined as responsible for examining the respective applications.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 908 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt a decision in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 56, lay down the modalities for the implementation of paragraph 3.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 919 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The European Union Agency for Asylum shall monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidarityopt-out mechanism.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 976 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
The automated system shall notify the Member States and the Commission as soon as the number of applications in the benefitting Member State for which it is the Member State responsible under this Regulation is below 15075 % of its share pursuant to Article 35(1).
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 993 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new)
That network shall promote the exchange of best practices concerning the examination of an asylum application by the competent authorities of Member States under this Regulation and initiate the training of the employees of those authorities.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1014 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 2 a (new)
GDP growth rate effectMS28a _________________ 28aFor three Member States, participation depends on the exercise of rights as set out in the relevant Protocols and other instruments.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1016 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 2 b (new)
Unemployment rate effectMS = 1/average unemployment rate during the preceding 12 months28b _________________ 28bFor three Member States, participation depends on the exercise of rights as set out in the relevant Protocols and other instruments.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1020 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 3
ShareMS = 250% Population effectMS + 250% GDP effectMS + 25% GDP growth rate effectMS + 25% unemployment rate effectMS
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 90 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13 a) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, as established by Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a , plays a key role in the Union efforts for a better management of external borders, the prevention of irregular immigration and secondary movement. Consequently, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be provided with access to Eurodac data in order to be able to undertake risk analyses to the highest possible standards and assisting Member States with return- related tasks. The processing of those data shall be carried out in compliance with the data protection safeguards provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/1624. _________________ 1aRegulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC (OJ L 251, 16.9.2016, p.1).
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 91 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 b (new)
(13 b) As one of the main tasks of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the future European Union Agency for Asylum, laid down in this Regulation, is the taking and transmitting of biometric data. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the European Union Agency for Asylum should be provided with an own interface in order to not be reliant on national infrastructures anymore. In the long run, these interfaces could be used as a single search interface, as described in the Commission Communication of 6 April 2016 entitled "Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security"1a . _________________ 1a COM(2016) 205 final
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 97 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) The High Level Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability is expected to present its results in spring 2017. Those results might be relevant for the development of Eurodac. Where this is the case, the best possible legal and technical prerequisites should be laid down for a potential interoperability of Eurodac with other information systems for borders and security.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 98 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) It is essential in the fight against terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences for the law enforcement authorities to have the fullest and most up- to-date information if they are to perform their tasks. The information contained in Eurodac is necessary for the purposes of the prevention, detection or, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences as referred to in Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA29Directive (EU) 2017/... of the European Parliament and of the Council [combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA] or of other serious criminal offences as referred to in Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA30 . Therefore, the data in Eurodac should be available, subject to the conditions set out in this Regulation, for comparison by the designated authorities of Member States and the European Police Office (Europol). _________________ 29 Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). 30Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 101 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Since Eurodac was originally established to facilitate the application of the Dublin Convention, access to Eurodac for the purposes of preventing, detecting or, investigating or prosecuting terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences constitutes a changefurther development of the original purpose of Eurodac, which. In line with the requirements of Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, any interferesnce with the fundamental right to respect for the private life of individuals whose personal data are processed in Eurodac. In line with the requirements of Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, any such interference must be in accordance with the law, which must be formulated with sufficient precision to allow individuals to adjust their conduct and it must protect individuals against arbitrariness and indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise. Any interference must be necessary to genuinely meet an objective of general interest and proportionate to the legitimate objective it aims to achieve.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 125 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Third-country nationals or stateless persons who have requested international protection in one Member State may try to request international protection in another Member State for many years to come. Therefore, the maximum period during which fingerprint and facial imagebiometric and alphanumeric data should be kept by the Central System should be of considerable length. Given that most third-country nationals or stateless persons who have stayed in the Union for several years will have obtained a settled status or even citizenship of a Member State after that period, a period of ten years should be considered a reasonable period for the storage of fingerprint and facial imagebiometric and alphanumeric data.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 130 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In view of successfully preventing and monitoring unauthorised movements of third-country nationals or stateless persons who have no right to stay in the Union, and of taking the necessary measures for successfully enforcing effective return and readmission to third countries in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC35 and the right to protection of personal data, a period of fiveten years should be considered a necessary period for the storage of fingerprint and facialbiometric and alphanumeric data. _________________ 35 OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p.98 OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p.98
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 158 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) lay down the conditions under which Member States' designated authorities and the European Police Office (Europol) may request the comparison of fingerprint and facial image data with those stored in the Central System for law enforcement purposes for the prevention, detection or, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences . (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 206 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) 'law enforcement' means the prevention, detection or, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences;
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 208 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) 'terrorist offences' means the offences under national law which correspond or are equivalent to those referred to in Articles 1 to 4 of Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA;referred to in Articles 3 to 12 of Directive (EU) 2017/... of the European Parliament and of the Council [on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA].
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 236 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a European Border and Coast Guard In accordance with Article (40)(8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624, the members of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency or teams of staff involved in return-related tasks as well as the members of the migration management support teams shall, within their mandate, have the right to access and search data entered in Eurodac within their mandate. They shall do so by using the technical interface set up and maintained by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency as referred to in Article (10)(3a).
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 252 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The duly authorized staff of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall have access to the statistics drawn up by eu-LISA referred to in paragraph (1)(a) to (h) and to the relevant data referred to in Article (12) (d) to (s), Article (13) (d) to (m) and Article (14) (d) to (m), solely for the purposes laid down in Article (1)(b) and for the purposes laid down in Articles 11 and 37 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624, without allowing for individual identification. The processing of those data shall be carried out in compliance with the data protection safeguards provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/1624.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 262 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. For the purposes of paragraph 3, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the future European Union Agency for Asylum shall set up and maintain a technical interface which allows a direct connection to the Central System of Eurodac.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 338 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes laid down in Article 13(1), each set of data relating to a third-country national or stateless person as referred to in Article 13(2) shall be stored in the Central System for fiveten years from the date on which his or her fingerprints were taken.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 344 #

2016/0132(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes laid down in Article 14(1), each set of data relating to a third-country national or stateless person as referred to in Article 14(2) shall be stored in the Central System for fiveten years from the date on which his or her fingerprints were taken.
2017/03/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 407 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The Agency shall, on its own initiative or at the request of the Commission, and in consultation with the Commission and Member-States, develop operational standards on the implementation of the instruments of Union law on asylum and indicators for monitoring compliance with those operational standards as well as guidelines and best practices related to the implementation of the instruments of Union law on asylum. The Agency shall, following consultation with the Commission and after adoption by the Management Board, communicate those standards, indicators, guidelines or best practices to the Member States.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 444 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the Agency shall receive anonymised data from Eurodac in real time.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 466 #

2016/0131(COD)

2 a. If an on-site visit reveals serious deficiencies deemed to jeopardize the functioning of the CEAS or to constitute a serious threat to public policy or internal security within the area without internal borders, the Commission, on its own initiative or at the request of the European Parliament or of a Member State, shall inform the European Parliament and the Council as soon as possible thereof.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 480 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Upon request of the European Parliament, the Agency shall transmit any document pertaining to the monitoring exercise.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 483 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6. The Agency shall inform the Commission and the European Parliament on a regular basis of the implementation of the action plan.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 490 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. If an on-site visit reveals serious deficiencies deemed to jeopardize the functioning of the CEAS or to constitute a serious threat to public policy or internal security within the area without internal borders, the Commission, on its own initiative or at the request of the European Parliament or of a Member State, shall inform the European Parliament and the Council as soon as possible thereof.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 493 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Upon request of the European Parliament, the European Commission shall transmit any document pertaining to the monitoring exercise.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 504 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point i a (new)
(i a) Assist Member States in ensuring all the necessary safeguards for vulnerable groups are in place;
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 522 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Management Board shall, on a proposal of the Executive Director, decide by a three-fourths majority of members with a right to vote on the profiles of experts and on the share that each Member State shall contribute to constitute the asylum intervention pool. The same procedure shall apply to any subsequent changes in the profiles and the overall number of experton the profiles of experts. The Agency may verify whether the experts proposed by the Member States correspond to the defined profiles.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 528 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Each Member State shall be responsible for its contribution to the number of experts, as referred to in paragraph 1, in accordance with Annex Ia.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 529 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. if a situation arises in which more experts are required than provided for under paragraphs 1, the executive director shall immediately inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. He or she shall also call upon the Council to seek commitments from Member States to meet the shortage.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 599 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. With regard to the processing of personal data under Article 17, the host Member State shall be considered as a data controller in accordance with Union data protection rules.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 620 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
The Agency shall cooperate with international organisations, in particular UNHCR, in areas governed by this Regulation, within the framework of working arrangements concluded with those bodies, in accordance with the Treaty and the provisions on the competence of those bodies. The Agency can enter into emergency standby agreements with international organizations and non-governmental organizations to complement the Agency operational and technical assistance to Member States, in particular by setting up reception facilities, providing information to asylum seekers or providing for specific needs of vulnerable groups. The Management Board shall decide on the working arrangements which shall be subject to prior approval of the Commission. The Agency shall inform the European Parliament of any such arrangements.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 642 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board from a list of at least three candidates proposed by the Commission, following an open and transparent selection procedure. The Executive Director shall be appointed on the ground of merit and documented high- level administrative and management skills as well as senior professional experience in the field of migration and asylum.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 645 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 3
3. Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Boards proposed by the Commission may be invited to make a statement before the competent committee of the European Parliament and answer questions put by its members. Following such a statement, the European Parliament shall adopt an opinion setting out its views and may indicate a preferred candidate. The Management Board shall appoint the executive director taking these views into account. The management board shall take its decision by a two thirds majority of all member with a right to vote. If the Management board takes a decision to appoint a candidate other than the candidate whom the European Parliament indicated as its preferred candidate, the management board shall inform the European Parliament and the Council in writing of the manner in which the opinion of the European Parliament was taken into account.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 653 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. The provisions of Article 45 shall apply to the Deputy Executive Director.deleted
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 654 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The deputy executive director shall be appointed by the management board on the proposal of the executive director. The deputy executive director shall be appointed on the grounds of merit and appropriate administrative and management skills as well as senior professional experience in the field of migration and asylum. The executive director shall propose at least three candidates for the post of deputy executive director. The management board shall take its decision by a two thirds majority of all members with a right to vote.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 677 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Classified information shall be made available to the European Parliament in accordance with this Regulation. The transmission and handling of information and documents transmitted to the European Parliament in accordance with this Regulation shall comply with the rules concerning the forwarding and handling of classified information which are applicable between the European Parliament and the Commission.
2016/10/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 160 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication of the Commission of 13 February 2008 entitled 'preparing the next steps in border management in the European Union'20 outlined the need, as part of the European integrated border management strategy, to establish an Entry/Exit System (EES) which registers electronically the time and place of entry and exit of third country nationals admitted for a short stay to the Schengen areaUnion and which calculates the duration of their authorised stay. _________________ 20 COM (2008) 69 final COM (2008) 69 final
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 173 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The EES should apply to third- country nationals admitted for a short stay to the Schengen areaterritory of the Union, regardless of whether or not the Schengen acquis is applicable in a given Member State. It should also apply to third -country nationals whose entry for a short stay has been refused.
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 271 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) A five year data retention period is necessary to allow the border guard performing the necessary risk analysis requested by the Schengen Borders Code before authorising a traveller entering the Schengen areaUnion. The processing of visa application in consular posts requires also analysing the travel history of the applicant to assess the use of previous visas and the respect of the conditions of stay. The abandoning of passport stamping will be compensated by a consultation of the EES. The travel history available in the system should therefore cover a period of time which is sufficient for the purpose of visa issuance. The five year data retention period will reduce the re-enrolment frequency and will be beneficial for all travellers as the average border crossing time will decrease as will do the waiting time at border crossing points. Even for a traveller entering only once in the Schengen areaEU, the fact that other travellers being already registered in the EES will not have to re-enrol will reduce the waiting time at border. This data retention period will also be necessary to allow for facilitation for the border crossing by using process accelerators and self-service systems. Such facilitation is dependent of the data registered in the system. A shorter data retention period would have a negative impact on the duration of border controls. A shorter data retention period would also reduce the group of travellers that can benefit of such facilitation and thereby undermine the stated objective of EES to facilitate border crossing.
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 304 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) This Regulation establishing the EES replaces the obligation to stamp passports of third country nationals which is applicable by all acceding Member States. Stays in Member States which are not yet fully applying the Schengen acquis in accordance with their respective Acts of Accession should not be taken into account in the calculation of the duration of the authorised stay in the Schengen area. Such Member States should register in the EES the stay of third country nationals but the automated calculator in the system should not compute it as part of the authorised length of stay.
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 357 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) enhance the efficiency of border checks by calculating and monitoring the duration of the authorised stay at entry and exit of third country nationals admitted for a short stay {or on the basis of a touring visa} in the Union;
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 362 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) assist in the identification of any person who does not, or does no longer fulfil the conditions for entry to or stay on the territory of the Member StatesUnion;
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 400 #

2016/0106(COD)

The EES shall include an automated calculator that indicates the maximum authorised duration of stay in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 for third country nationals registered in the EES admitted for a short stay {or on the basis of a touring visa} in the Union.
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 410 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Stays in Member States which are not yet fully applying the Schengen acquis in accordance with their respective Acts of Accession shall not be taken into account in the calculation of the duration of the authorised stay in the Schengen area. Those Member States shall register the stays of third country nationals in the EES. The automated calculator in the system shall not however compute stays in Member States which are not yet fully applying the Schengen acquis as part of the authorised length of stay.deleted
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 416 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The EES shall include a mechanism that shall automatically identify which entry/exit records do not have exit data immediately following the date of expiry of the authorised length of stay in the Union and identify records for which the maximum stay allowance in the Union has been exceeded.
2017/01/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 490 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – title
Access to data for verification within the territory of the Member StatesUnion
2017/01/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 491 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For the purpose of verifying the identity of the third country national and/or whether the conditions for entry to or stay on the territory of the Member StatesUnion are fulfilled, the authorities of the Member States competent to carry out checks within the territory of the Member States as to whether the conditions for entry to, stay or residence on the territory of the Member StatesUnion are fulfilled, shall have access to search with the data referred to in Article 14(1)(a), (b) and (c).
2017/01/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 540 #

2016/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. The access to the EES as a criminal intelligence tool to consult the travel history or the periods of stay in the Schengen areaUnion of a known suspect, perpetrator or suspected victim of a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offence shall be allowed when the conditions listed in paragraph 1 are met and where there is a duly justified need to consult the entry/exit records of the person concerned.
2017/01/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 6 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
– having regard to Articles 21, 23, 24 25 and 256 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 35 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
– having regard to the Commission strategic engagement for gender equality 2016-2019,deleted
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 49 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21
– having regard to the Commission roadmap on a possible EU accession to the Istanbul Convention, published in October 2015;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 52 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22
– having regard to Article 3 of the Istanbul Convention, which defines ‘gender-based violence against women’ as ‘violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately’ and defines ‘gender’ as ‘the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men’,deleted
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 56 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 23
– having regard to the Third Quarterly Activity Report of the Commissioner of Human Rights of the Council of Europe of 16 November 20176, in relation to the definition of gender-based violence in the Istanbul Convention,
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 129 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas exposure to physical, sexual or psychological violence and abuse has a severe impact on victims; whereas children do not need to be directly affected by the violence to be considered victims as witnessing domestic violence is also traumatising;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 133 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Istanbul Convention clearly in art.3 defines “gender-based violence” as “violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately” and furthermore defines “gender” as “the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men”;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 187 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that on 4 March 2016 the Commission proposed the EU’s accession to the Istanbul Convention – the first comprehensive legally binding instrument on preventing and combating violence against women at international level;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 197 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the fact that women and girls are often exposed to domestic violence, sexual harassment, sexual violence and rape, forced marriage, honour killings, feminicide, female genital mutilation and other forms of violence, which constitute a serious violation of the human rights and dignity of women and girls; denounces that more and more women and girls are victims of gender-based violence on the internet and on social media; Calls on Member States to adopt concrete measures to address these new forms of crimes, including sex- extortion, grooming, voyeurism and revenge pornography, and protect victims, who experience serious trauma leading sometimes even to suicide;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 229 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point c
(c) To ask the Commission to initiate, without delay, a constructive dialogue with the Council and Member States, in cooperation with the Council of Europe, so as to address reservations, objections and concerns expressed by Member States; and clarifyin particular to clarify misleading interpretations of the Istanbul Convention, in particular on on the definition of gender-based violence and the definition of gender in Article 3(c) and (d), in accordance with the General Remarks of the Commissioner of Human Rights of the Council of Europe;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 233 #

2016/0062(NLE)

(ca) To produce practical guidelines on the application of the Istanbul Convention to facilitate a smooth implementation and enforcement of the Convention in countries that have already ratified it as well as to respond to the concerns of those that have not yet ratified it and encourage them to do so;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 236 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point e
(e) To envisage rendering thesure a EU accession to the Istanbul Convention as broad as possible and without reservations;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 263 #

2016/0062(NLE)

(i) To ensure preventive measures in order to address the specific needs of vulnerable persons, such as women with disabilities and child victims, including specialist support services and safe accommodation for women who have been the victims of gender-based violence and their children;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 269 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point i a (new)
(ia) Take into account significant incidents of violence against women and domestic violence when determining custody and visitation rights; the rights and needs of child witnesses should be also taken into account when providing protection and support services to victims;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 315 #

2016/0062(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States to fully implement Directive 2011/99/EU on European Protection order, Regulation (EU) on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matter and Directive 2012/29/EU on protection of victims as well as Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in Human being and Directive 2011/92/EU on preventing and combating child sexual abuse and exploitation;
2017/05/11
Committee: LIBEFEMM
Amendment 242 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Union to focus, too, on cooperating with regional organisations, including the African Union, the Gulf Cooperation Council and the Arab League, and encouraging them to mobilise to the full; notes that the economic integration of sub-regional entities, particularly in Africa, offers a further means of promoting a joint- management approach and encouraging South-South initiatives on migration management and mobility; enjoins the EU to seek a stronger and more credible role for the African Union in preventing political crises in Africa;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 281 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses nonetheless the need to find political solutions to violent conflicts and to invest in early-warning and conflict- prevention mechanisms so as to reduce them in the future; calls for the EU to take a more active and effective role in the field of prevention and mediation and to endow itself with the necessary resources and powers to make that possible; points out that the EU delegations and the special representatives have a fundamental role to play in this respect; stresses that the response to forced displacement needs to be rights-based and take account of the population’s vulnerabilities – in particular as regards women and minors – and not be limited to humanitarian assistance but also involve development actors;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 294 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the EU also to take a leading role in recognising the impact of climate change on mass displacement; points out that the scale and frequency of displacements are likely to increase; takes the view that persons displaced by the effects of climate change should be given a special international status which is distinct from refugee status and which takes account of the specific nature of their situation;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 372 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the new Partnership Framework with third countries as a signal of real political action; stresses that the success of the approach outlined in the communication of June 2016 depends on the EU’s capacity to offer real, commonly agreed incentives to third countries and is concerned by the limited offer mainly focused on border management or Assisted Voluntary Return schemes, which – while essential and needed – constitute only a partial response to the situation; calls on the EU also to encourage closer cooperation between third countries from the same region or sub-region; stresses the key role that regional and sub- regional organisations, in particular those in Africa, have to play in that respect; highlights the need to balance and complement this response, focusing on the development of local economies, qualification and regional mobility and improved levels of protection in countries of transit and origin;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 392 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses concerns regarding the quantitative approach in the new Partnership Framework and the related ‘migration compacts’, which see the ‘measurable increases in the number and rate of returns’ as one of the EU’s main goals, as the number of returns clearly depends on the nature of migration flows and on the situations in the countries of origin; stresses that the short-term objectives of the compacts should focus on how best to address the challenges faced by third countries, including by developing legal migration channels, as a result of which the levels of irregular migration and death tolls in the Mediterranean will decrease; points out, nonetheless, that third countries must meet their obligations under readmission agreements; highlights the shared responsibility of the EU and its Member States, on the one hand, and of third countries which are countries of origin or transit, on the other, to spread information about legal migration channels, the rights of migrants and the risks of irregular migration by means of targeted information campaigns;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 417 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the high-level dialogues carried out by the VP/HR and the Commission, and in some cases by Member States on behalf of the EU as a whole, as good and effective practices fostering coordination; stresses that coordination should be undertaken by the Commission and the EEAS; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to keep Parliament regularly informed of these dialogues and to report on the exact operational implementation of the Rabat and Khartoum processes and the priority initiatives agreed at the Valletta Summit; points out again that the shared ownership of partnerships concluded between the EU and third countries is a prerequisite for the success of EU migration policy; notes that the packages designed for priority countries as part of the new Partnership Framework, by the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States, have neither been presented nor debated by the elected representatives of European citizens;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the treatment of women and girls seeking asylum across Member States is inconsistentdiffers hugely, and very significant shortcomings remain;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has reported instances of violence and abuse, including sexual violence, against refugee women and children, particularlythroughout their journey and including in overcrowded reception centres in the EU;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that, to improve the security and safety of women refugees,and girls refugees, Member States should use all safe and legal routes to the EU must be made available for receiving those fleeing conflict and persecution; stresses in particular that more Member States should participate to the EU Resettlement Programmes; believes that legislation and policies relating to irregular migration should neverot prevent access to EU asylum procedures;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its call for all Member States and the European Union to sign and ratify the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women (Istanbul Convention);
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 91 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to amend Regulation (EC) 862/2007 on Communitythoroughly gather statistics on migration and international protection with a view to adding more gender disaggregated data categories, particularly in relation to stages in the asylum process after an initial decision has been made;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 101 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. NotWelcomes the Commission's proposal to establish a common EU list of safe countries of origin; demands that all appropriate steps be taken to ensure that this approach is consistent with the principle of non-refoulement and that the rights of women, children and other vulnerable groups are not undermined; calls for gender differentiation to be applied; believes that claims based on fear of gender-based violence or discrimination should never, in principle, not be subject to accelerated asylum procedures bearing in mind that member states should apply the European asylum laws;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 113 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Member States to give reasons for positive asylum decisions in order to make available useful data on the consideration given tocases of gender- based violence and to provide transparency about the Convention grounds on which asylum claims have been granted;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 117 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to exploitation by smugglers; calls therefore on Member States to increase their police and judicial cooperation, including with Europol, Frontex, Eurojust and EASO to effectively combat smuggling and trafficking of migrants;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 140 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Strongly condemns the use of sexual violence against women as a weapon of war; considers that special attention should be given to migrant women and girls abused in conflicts by ensuring access to medical and psychological support;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 154 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that the needs of vulnerable people such as women victims of violence and girls, in particular unaccompanied girls, should be prioritised in the reception procedures;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 159 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights that many women asylum seekers and refugees have experienced extreme violence and that detention may exacerbate their trauma; calls for an immediate end, in all Member States, to the detention of girls because of their status of migrant and stresses that the need of pregnant women seeking asylum and the detention of survivors of rape and sexual violence are more appropriately accommodated in tailored facilities;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 165 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the urgent need for independent investigations into all allegations of abussexual abuse and gender based violence at places of immigration detention and for access to be granted to journalists;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 168 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges all Member States to reduce maximumkeep limits to the duration of detention prior to removal to belowto the limit stipulated in the Return Directive; considers that prolonged detention disproportionately harms vulnerable groups;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to develop and implement specific measures to facilitate labour market participation of women refugees and asylum seekers, including language classes, lifelong learning and training; stresses the importance of widening access to higher education for women refugees; calls for robust and transparent procedures for recognising qualifications obtained abroadand girls refugees;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 183 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to develop and implement specific measures to facilitate labour market participation of women refugees and asylum seekers, including language classes, lifelong learning and training; stresses the importance of widening access to higher education for women and girls refugees; calls for robust and transparent procedures for recognising qualifications obtained abroad;
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 197 #

2015/2325(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions would enable better opportunities for jobs, integration and family reunification;deleted
2015/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #

2015/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the primary mechanism for European cooperation with the AU is the African Peace Facility, originally established in 2004 and providing some €EUR 1.9 billion through the Member State-funded EDF; whereas in 2007 the scope of the Facility was broadened to encompass a wider range of conflict- prevention and post-conflict stabilisation activities; whereas the 2014-2016 action programme takes account of external evaluation and consultations with Member States and introduces new elements to improve its effectiveness; whereas strengthening the institutional capacity of the African Union and the African regional economic communities is vital to the success of PSOs and of post-conflict reconciliation and rehabilitation processes;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 77 #

2015/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises, nevertheless, the importance of investing more in conflict prevention, taking account of factors such as political or religious radicalisation, election-related violence, population displacements or climate change;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2015/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the African Peace Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States should remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully exploited; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s singular focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa; calls for more systematic joint programming among the various EU instruments;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2015/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Points out that the EU must continue to make women's involvement in peace support operations, plus gender mainstreaming, a key component of long- term peace building; calls for persons deployed on PSOs to be systematically trained in compliance with human rights, in particular women's rights, and for awareness to be raised of gender violence and of the provision of care for victims in conflict situations;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2015/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Insists that the EUneither the EU nor its Member States, in supporting PSOs, should not act in isolation but that they should, rather, take full account of the contributions of other international actors, improve coordination with them and rapidity of response, and focus itstheir efforts on certain priority countries, using the most appropriate and experienced Member States as lead nations; points up the role of the EU's delegations as regards coordination and dialogue with the other international actors;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
— having regard to Article 4(3) and 5 TEU, Article 295 TFEU and Protocol No 1 on the role of national parliaments in the European Union, and Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 95 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas all Member States, the institutions of the Union and candidate countries share obliged to uphold those principles and values, and they have the duty of loyal cooperationprinciples and values which result from the constitutional traditions coming from the Member States;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 239 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital V
V. whereas a new mechanism should be based on the following guiding principles: evidence based; objective; non- discriminatory and assessing on an equal footing, respecting the principle of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality; applying to both Member States and institutions of the Union; and based on a graduated approach, including both a preventative and corrective arm;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 265 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Requests the Commission to submit, by the end of 20167, on the basis of Article 295 TFEU, a proposal for the conclusion of an EU Pact for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights (DRF) in the form of an interinstitutional agreement laying down arrangements facilitating the cooperation of institutions of the Union and its Member States in the framework of Article 7 TEU, integrating, aligning and complementing existing mechanisms, following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 276 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends, in particular, that the mechanisms of the EU Pact for DRF include preventative and corrective elements, and apply to all Member States as well as the three main institutions of the Union; with respect to the principles of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 305 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the creation of a Union Fund, on the basis of a pilot project, for legal assistance to individuals and organisations litigating cases relating to DRF violations by national governments or the institutions of the Union;deleted
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 338 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that the DRF expert panel, as per the proposed interinstitutional agreement, also assess access to justice at the European level, applying the same benchmarks to the CJEU and ECtHR, including aspects such as independence and impartiality of courts and judges, length and cost of litigation, implementation of court rulings, scope of judicial control and redress available to citizens, and options for cross border collective redress;
2016/06/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 408 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Citation 3
– having regard to Article 4(3) and Article 5 TEU, Article 295 TFEU and Protocol No 1 on the role of national parliaments in the European Union and Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 440 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Recital 1
(1) Whereas there is a need for a democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights (DRF) mechanism that is objective, evidence-based and applied equally and fairly to all Member States, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity, necessity and proportionality and that includes both the preventative and the corrective dimension;
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 460 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 2
The core elements of the Union Pact on DRF shall consist of the DRF Scoreboard, the DRF Semester, including an a European Report with country-specific recommendations (the Report) and incorporating, where possible, the reporting of the FRA, the Council of Europe, and other relevant authorities in the field, a bi-annual inter-parliamentary debate on the basis of that ScoreboardReport, and arrangements for remedying possible risks and breaches, as provided for by the Treaties and for the activation of the preventative or corrective arms of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), and a DRF policy cycle within the institutions of the Union;
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 470 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 4
An bi-annual scoreboardReport on the state of DRF in the Member States shall be elaborated by an independent panel of experts and adopted by the Commissionshall be forwarded to the Commission, which shall transmit it to the European Parliament, the Council, and the national parliaments while at the same time assessing the recommendations of the panel. Those reports shall be made available to the public;
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 475 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 5
The DRF ScoreboardReport shall incorporate, replace and complete existing instruments, in particular the Justice Scoreboard, the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) for Bulgaria and Romania, the Media Pluralism Monitor, the anti- corruption report and peer evaluation procedures based on Article 70 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and replace the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) for Bulgaria and Romania;
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 479 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 6 – introductory part
The DRF ScoreboardReport shall be drawn up using a variety of sources, and the existing tools for assessment, reporting and monitoring of Member States’ activities including:
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 490 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
All the contributions from the above- mentioned sources shall be made available to the public on the websites of the panel or the Commission.
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 523 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 9 – introductory part
The assessment of the state of DRF in the Member States, as well as the development of country-specific draft recommendations, shall be carried out by a broad and representative panel of independent experts ('DRF expert panel'), on the basis of a quantitative and qualitative review of the data and information available.
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 540 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 9 – point 9.2 a (new)
9.2a The expert panel shall adopt the Report by a majority of two thirds of its members.
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 644 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 16 – introductory part
The Report with country specific recommendations shall replace the annual reports of the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament relating to enforcement and compliance with the rule of law and fundamental rights by the institutions of the Union, shall be included in the annual DRF policy cycle of the DRF Scoreboarduch as:
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 651 #

2015/2254(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – Article 16 –indent 3 a (new)
– Annual report on the situation of Fundamental rights in the EU.
2016/06/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 35 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the countries in the region, and calls on the Commission, to focus also on women's involvement in decision-taking, in particular political decision-taking;
2015/11/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 24 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the budgetary impact of the measures presented as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular with regard to Europol and its related tasks in the fields of anti-terrorism, organised crime and, cybercrime and newly planned hotspots, should be further explained and detailed by the Commission; acknowledges that the draft budget 2016 does not take into account the full scale of immediate additional responsibilities entrusted to Europol in the European Agenda on Security and the European Agenda on Migration and underlines the need to ensure an appropriate budget and level of staffing for Europol for 2016, to allow it to effectively fulfil its tasks.
2015/08/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 16 #

2015/2129(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Is concerned that the non- consensual distribution of erotic or pornographic material, including online and through social media, such as the phenomenon of so-called ‘revenge porn’– a rapidly increasing form of abuse and persecution – overwhelmingly affects women and girls, some of whom are under the legal age of consent; calls on the Member States to step up concrete measures to combat this new form of crime and on the internet industry to take their shared responsibility; emphasises the need to educate young girls on the possible consequences of taking intimate photographs or videos of themselves;
2017/05/22
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2015/2129(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need to raise awareness at an early stage among all girls and boys about staying safe and about the importance of respecting the dignity and privacy of others in the digital era; encourages Member States to share best practices on education material and training programmes for all actors involved, such as teachers, educators, law enforcement authorities on grooming and other forms of risk to the safety of children online, in particular for girls;
2017/05/22
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2015/2129(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States to step up measures to protect victims of child sexual abuse and to improve the role of national helplines, with a gender sensitive approach;
2017/05/22
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2015/2129(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Calls on the Member States to step up cooperation and to exchange data to identify children victims of sexual abuse, including missing children, especially girls who are particularly vulnerable to trafficking and sexual exploitation;
2017/05/22
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 5 #

2015/2126(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) Article 11 of Council Regulation 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the year 2014- 20204 has established a Flexibility Instrument of up to EUR 471 million (2011 prices) per year. Member States nowadays face unprecedented challenges in the field of migration and security. During the planning of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2014-2020 the huge migratory pressure towards the EU has not been foreseen. The new dramatic challenges in the field of migration and security should lead to a revision of the MFF in order to support the Member States to better manage the exceptional difficulties, ___________________ 4 OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.
2015/08/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2015/2126(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
In order to guarantee the proper spending of the financial resources the European Commission and the responsible agencies should support the Member States in creating well performing administrations and guarantee effective and regular controls for a sound financial management.
2015/08/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 12 #

2015/2121(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the extra funding for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund; queries if the proposed funding will be sufficient to allow for full financing of the Commission’s relocation-mechanism and resettlement-programme proposals and for supporting all frontline Member States that experience migratory pressure in the implementation of the Common European Asylum System;
2015/06/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2121(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Concludes that to prevent further loss of life at sea and to further implement the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, greater and more predictable financial resources will be required in the medium and long term.
2015/06/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 (new)
– having regard to Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA,
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 2 (new)
– having regard to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 3 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 3 (new)
– having regard to the 1979 UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW),
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 4 (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989,
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 5 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 5 (new)
– having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention),
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 6 (new)
– having regard to the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted by the Fourth World Conference on Women on 15 September 1995, and to the subsequent outcome documents adopted at the United Nations Beijing +5, Beijing +10 and Beijing +15 special sessions and the Beijing +20 review conference,
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 7 (new)
– having regard to Article 5 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
– having regard to the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the European Parliament Resolution of 27 November 2014 on the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the demand for women, girls, men and boys in the prostitution industries is a decisive pull factor for THB for sexual exploitation; and whereas the demand for cheap labour and incapacity to uphold labour rights are pull factors for THB for labour exploitation;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 29 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E
E. whereas special attention must be given to vulnerable groups such as Roma, children and refugees, including children, unaccompanied minors, migrant women and Roma;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas THB takes many different forms across many legal and illegal activities, including, but not limited to, agriculture, food processing, prostitution, sexual exploitation of children online, domestic work, manufacturing, care, cleaning, other types of forced labour (particularly in the service industries), forced begging, forced criminality, forced marriage, illegal adoptions and the trade in human organs;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 42 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States and intergovernmental organizations to ensure that their interventions address the factors that increase vulnerability to trafficking, including inequality, poverty and all forms of discrimination;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 43 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to accelerate the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in Human beings and protecting its victims;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Member States to combat impunity, criminalise trafficking and ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice and that sanctions are strengthened; calls on Member States to improve collection of evidence and to increase police and judiciary cooperation to combat trafficking including with Europol and Eurojust.
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Insists that equality between men and women and zero tolerance towards violence against women are core values of the European Union to be respected by all people on the territory regardless from which culture they originate; considers that in the respect of the rule of law and to protect the security of women in Europe those migrants who perpetrated criminal activities like human trafficking, sexual exploitation and forced labour should, after a fair trial, be repatriated;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 56 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States to strengthen cooperation in order to track and confiscate assets of traffickers; calls on Member States to use all existing tools available more efficiently such as mutual recognition of Court judgements, joint investigation teams and the European investigation order;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Member States to make legal aid available to victims of trafficking not only in criminal proceedings, but also in civil, labour or immigration/asylum proceedings in which they are involved;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas particular attention should be given to children, unaccompanied minors and migrant women as they face multiple risks;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 63 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses the importance of 'following the money' as a key strategy to investigate and prosecute the organised crime networks that profit from THB, and calls on Europol and Eurojust to reinforce its capacities in the field of combating THB; Member States should freeze and confiscate the assets of individuals involved in trafficking, the confiscated assets of persons convicted of trafficking offences should be used to support and compensate victims of trafficking;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 72 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals that create consistency in EU legislatiMember States to fully implement articles 11to 17 concerning protection and support of victims of Trafficking in Human Beings of the Directive 2011/36/EU and fully implement Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on, to ensure that victims of THB are entitled tohe rights, support and protection of victims of crime to ensure consistency and proper support and assistance for victims of Trafficking in human beings;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 72 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas a majority of the registered victims are women and girls trafficked for the purposes of sexual exploitation, together comprising up to 95 % of the victims trafficked for sexual exploitation12 ; whereas trafficking is a form of violence against women and girls; __________________ 12 Idem, Eurostat report.
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 78 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas there is a clear distinction between THB and human smuggling, but undocumented migrants are particularly vulnerable to exploitation and further victimisation, especially children and women;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 79 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for better implementation of Article 11 of the directive, so as to ensure the early identification, adequate assistance and protection of victims of trafficking, in particular by increasing the number of shelters for victims and by strengthening programmes for victims' reintegration into society;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 80 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that according to Europol about 10.000 unaccompanied children have disappeared after their arrival in the EU in 2015 and that they could be victims of trafficking and exposed to all sort of exploitation and abuse; calls on the Member States to fully implement the asylum package and register children upon their arrival in order to ensure their inclusion in the Child protection systems; calls on the Member States to increase information sharing in order to better protect migrant children in Europe;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 81 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas trafficking is a serious organised crime that generates high profits of about 150 billion dollars a year; whereas there is still too low risk of being prosecuted and too low sanctions to be applied to deter crime compared to the high profits;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 83 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses that prevention in terms of taking appropriate measures, such as education and training, to discourage and reduce demand, as well as information and awareness-raising campaigns, research and educational programmes, aimed at reducing the risk of people, becoming victims of trafficking, is of crucial importance to effectively combat trafficking in human beings;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 86 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Underlines that training for officials likely to come into contact with victims or potential victims of trafficking in human beings is essential, so that those involved fully understand the phenomenon they are seeking to tackle and know how to recognise it at an early stage;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to speed up the full and correct enforcement of Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in Human beings and protecting its victims;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 90 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States to combat impunity, criminalise trafficking and ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice and that sanctions are strengthened as well as adequate to be dissuasive; calls on Member States to improve collection of evidence to combat trafficking and to increase police and judiciary cooperation including with Europol, Eurojust and Frontex with particular attention to the gender dimension of THB;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 94 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. AcknowledgeCommends the good work done by the office of the EU Anti-Trafficking Coordinator in the development ofing knowledge and evidence on the various aspects of THB, including research into the gender dimension and the particular vulnerability of children;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 98 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to strengthen cooperation in order to track and confiscate assets of traffickers, in particular linked to abuse and sexual exploitation of women and girls; calls on Member States to use all existing tools available more efficiently such as mutual recognition of Court judgements, joint investigation teams and the European investigation order;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 100 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Considers that migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking, especially children and women; calls on Member States to increase cooperation, including in the hotspots, to identify potential victims and to use all means to combat traffickers and smugglers;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 104 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to implement the principle of non- refoulement in their anti-trafficking directives as is the case in the UN Trafficking Protocol and the CoE Trafficking Convention and in accordance with States obligations under international refugee law and international human rights law;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 105 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that training of practitioners and officials is crucial to early identify potential victims and prevent crime; calls therefore on the Member States to fully apply art 18. 3 of the Directive 2011/36/EU and to share best practices;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 105 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that under Article 11 of the directive, Member States have an obligation to establish mechanisms to ensure the early identification of, assistance to and support for victims, in cooperation with relevant support organisations; calls on Member States to implement Articles 11 to 17 of the Directive concerning protection and support of victims with a gender sensitive approach and to fully apply Directive 2012/29/ EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime to ensure proper support and assistance for victims of THB;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 111 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that migrants are particularly vulnerable to trafficking, especially children; calls on Member States to increase cooperation, including in the hotspots, to identify potential victims and to use all means, including military operations, to combat traffickers and smugglers;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 112 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Highlights that third country nationals victims of trafficking should be given the possibility to safe return, but also be entitled to residence permits, in order to ensure their proper access to justice, support and assistance;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 115 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Considers that safe and legal ways of entry to the EU would decrease vulnerability and trafficking in human beings;
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 117 #

2015/2118(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Recalls the obligation of Member States to pay special attention to child victims of trafficking including unaccompanied minors coming from third countries, and to provide special protection to children in criminal procedures, the best interests of the child must be considered paramount at all times (Art 13, 14,15,16);
2016/02/24
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 117 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the huge and increasing role of the internet in the recruitment of victims and the exchange of information between criminal networks; calls on the Member States to ensure that their respective anti- trafficking policies take account of this and that law enforcement efforts addressing cyber technologies have the gender expertise needed to tackle this in the best way; stresses that new technologies, social media and the internet should also be used to raise awareness and alert potential victims on the risks of trafficking;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 136 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines based on best practices to develop and mainstream gender expertise into the activities of law enforcement bodauthorities across EU;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 141 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. CRecalls on the Commission and the Member States to work together tothat training of practitioners and officials is crucial to early identify potential victims and prevent crime; calls therefore on the Member States to fully apply art 18. 3 of the Directive 2011/36/EU and to share best practices in particular when createing gender-sensitive training programmes for persons coming in contact with victims of THB in an official capacity, including police officers, border officers, judges, magistrates, lawyers, front-line medical staff and social workers; stresses that training should include detection of victims, the formal identification process and appropriate, gender-specific assistance for victims;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 149 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Member States actively to include social partners, private sector, trade unions and civil society in their initiatives to prevent THB, particularly in the field of labour exploitation, including as regards the identification of victims and awareness- raising activities;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 154 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that while sexual exploitation of children is illegal in all Member States, this does not prevent trafficking of children for sexual exploitation; calls on the CommissionMember States to fully implement Directive 2011/92/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography and to step up their police and judicial cooperation to prevent and combat child sexual exploitation; calls on the Commission in cooperation with the Member States to examine how the demand for sexual services drives child trafficking, and how beston Member States to share best practices to reduce demand;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 181 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Notes that it is already illegal under Directive 2009/52/EC for employers to use the work or services of third-country nationals with no legal residency status in the EU with the knowledge that they are victims of THB,; and is concernedacknowledges that EU nationals who are victims of THB are not included under this legislation; asks that the Commission examine the impact of this apparent loophole and assess the need to change the legislation in order to close itcalls on the Member States to ensure that in their national legislation EU- nationals victims of trafficking are protected from labour exploitation and relevant sanctions are put in place;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 182 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Recalls that according to Europol about 10.000 unaccompanied children have disappeared after their arrival in the EU in 2015 and that they could be victims of trafficking and exposed to all sort of exploitation and abuse; calls on the Member States to register children upon their arrival and ensure their inclusion in the Child protection systems; calls on the Member States to increase information sharing in order to better protect migrant children in Europe who are particularly vulnerable to trafficking;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 223 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Calls on the Member StatesRecalls that according to Directive 2004/81/EC Member States are bounded to allow a period of reflection and recovery for victims of trafficking in human beings; Calls on the Member States when determining the duration of such a period to take into account art.13 of the Council of Europe Convention on action against trafficking in human beings and to assess the possibility of extending the minimum 30-day recovery and reflection period included in the Council of Europe Convention for women trafficked for the purposes of sexual exploitation, given the significant and sustained harms of this form of violence against women;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 225 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Notes that the current EU Strategy towards the Eradication of THB comes to an end in 2016, and calls on the Commission to evaluate the current strategy and introduce a new one that includes a clear gender dimension and contains concrete actions in this regard; calls for this strategy to be integrated and made coherent with other policy areas, with a view to ensuring effective implementation of anti-trafficking measures, including, but not limited to, security, migrationgender equality, migration, cybersecurity and law enforcement.
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 229 #

2015/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Asks thatCalls on the Member States to collect more detailed data by compiling reliable statistical information gathered from all main actors, by ensuring that the data is disaggregated by gender, age, type of exploitation (within the subsets of types of THB), country of origin and destination, and by including internally trafficked people, to better assess the gender dimensionidentify potential victims and precvent trendcrime; calls ion THB, as well as by collecting data on recovthe Member States to increase data sharing to bettery and reflection periods, residence permits and victim compensationssess the gender dimension and recent trends in THB and combat trafficking more effectively; calls on the Members States to ensure that national rapporteurs play a more significant role in the coordination of data collection initiatives, in close cooperation with relevant civil society organisations active in this field;
2016/03/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2015/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need for labour inspectors and workplace doctors to be made aware of and trained in gender-related violence in order for them to be able to identify it and provide appropriate help to women who are victims of domestic violence or of bullying or sexual harassment at work;
2015/06/24
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas women and girls asylum seekers and undocumented migrants are particularly vulnerable to all forms of violence, including sexual violence, at all stages of their journey;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas there exist disparities across the Member States in the treatment of women and girls seeking asylum and a holistic EU approach to asylum and immigration must ensure that consistent and gender-sensitive procedures are in place;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the persistent instability and conflicts in the EU’s neighbourhood have a serious impact on the mass influx of migrants; believes that a genuine response to the migration crisis in the Mediterranean will come only from tackling the root causes, namely poverty, instabilitythe lack of stable democratic States, wars, persecution, violations of human rights and natural disasters;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that, regardless of legal status, decisions to detain should take into account oif past histories ofwomen have undergone trauma including experiences of sexual violence, and that the needs of pregnant women are more appropriately accommodated in tailored facilitie or FGM; considers that pregnant women in particular and single mothers should receive a treatment that takes into account their condition; stresses that girls should never be detained because of their status of migrants;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 72 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the additions made by the Recast Reception Conditions Directive, namely the inclusion of victims of human trafficking and FGM as separate categories of vulnerable persons; expresses its deep concern that only 12 Member States have applied vulnerable person status to victims of human trafficking; calls on the remaining Member States to implement the provisions of the Recast Reception Conditions Directive;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 76 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Member States to fully implement Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims and Directive 2012/29/EU on establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 78 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Member States to ratify the Istanbul Convention on violence against women and domestic violence to ensure protection of migrant women and girls from violence;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to exploitation by smugglers; calls therefore on Member States to increase their police and judicial cooperation including with Europol, Frontex, Eurojust and EASO to effectively combat migrant smuggling;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 88 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas solidarity can take the forms of internal and external solidarity; and whereas relocation, mutual recognition of asylum decisions, operational support measures, shared responsibility in the management of the external EU borders and migratory flows, a pro-active interpretation of the current Dublin Regulation and the Temporary Protection Directive are all tools for internal solidarity, while resettlement, humanitarian admission and search and rescue at sea promote external solidarity;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, notwithstanding fluctuation in migration flows which may put pressure on reception facilities, the needs of vulnerable people including women and girls, in particular unaccompanied girls, should be prioritised at all times;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 96 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines in particular the importance of ensuring access to education for migrant girls, especially when unaccompanied;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 100 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that economic independence is key to equality and to integration; calls therefore on Member States to facilitate access to work for migrant women;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 102 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Strongly condemns the use of sexual violence against women as a weapon of war; considers that special attention should be given to migrant women and girls abused in conflicts by ensuring access to medical and psychological support;
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 107 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the UNHCR, EASO and Member States to ensure that the highest possible standards are in place for recruitment and that training which promotes a gender-based approach is provided for all staff.
2015/09/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 109 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the fight against migrant smuggling, trafficking and labour exploitation necessitates both short, medium and long-term responses, including measures to disrupt criminal networks and to bring criminals to justice, the gathering and, analysis and sharing of data, measures to protect victims and to return irregularly staying migrants, as well as cooperation and joint actions with third countries and longer- term strategies to address the demand for trafficked and smuggled persons and the root causes of migration which force people into the hands of criminal smugglers;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 128 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the abolishment of internal border controls must go hand-in-hand with the effective management of external borders, with high common standards, effective exchange of information between Member States, and full respect for everyone's fundamental rights; and whereas the Member States at the external borders of the EU should be adequately supported with technical and financial means in securing and managing these borders;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 136 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that development assistance plays a crucial role in tackling the root causes of migration; stresses the need forat the EU must continuous EUe to support toin the long term international efforts towards poverty reduction, as well as to peace-building, promotion of democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms, regional, political and economic stability, security and prosperity., by improving even further the effectiveness of its development assistance and working harder to prevent conflicts;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas individual Member States continue to develop intense external action on migration at the bilateral level, including bilateral readmission agreements and joint actions with third countries;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 277 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for a clear distinction to be made between those persons who are smuggled into the Union and those who are trafficked into the Union because, while the policy response must be properly integrated, they must also be properly targeted; states that, in general terms, the criminal smuggling of migrants involves facilitating the irregular entry of a person to a Member State, whereas human trafficking involves the recruitment, transportation or reception of a person through the use of violent, deceptive or abusive means, for the purpose of exploitation; recalls the importance to examine the links between different types of organised crime, as networks become increasingly loose and flexible.
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 290 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Holds that any holistic approach to migration must necessarily contain measures aimed at disrupting the activities of criminal networks involved in the trafficking and smuggling of people; calls on the Member States to intensify the fight against people smuggling and human trafficking, the exchange of information on such networks, and the cooperation with neighbouring countries on the matter;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 340 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that full use should be made of existing instruments, such as the agencies’ risk analyses; observes that Union agencies should cooperate fully, but that they also need to step up cooperation with Member States; notes that better coordination of efforts should allow for the systematic collection of data at national level on the routes, modus operandi and profiles of smugglers, and its onward communication to the Agencies;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 342 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Underlines the importance to provide common specialised trainings to border guards, legal practitioners and other national competent authorities to equip them with the necessary skills and to ensure greater coherence and consistency within the European Union;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 397 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes, in addition, that Member States of first arrival will therefore have to handle the more complicated asylum claims (and appeals), will have to organise longer periods of reception, and will have to organise and coordinate returns for those ultimately not entitled to international protection; therefore, is of the view that if a Member State of first arrival experiences a sudden and disproportionate influx of migrants that puts a great burden on its asylum system and social services, it will have the right to temporarily suspend accepting applicants for international protection under any type of Relocation Mechanism;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 458 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that, given the unprecedented flows of migrants that have reached and continue to reach the Union’s external borders, and the steady increase in the number of people asking for international protection, the Union needs a binding and mandatory legislative approach to resettlement, as set out in the Commission’s agenda for migration; recommends that, to have an impact, such an approach must provide for resettlement of a meaningful number of refugees, with regard to the overall numbers of refugees seeking international protection in the Union;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 469 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines that there is a need for a permanent Union-wide resettlement programme, with mandatovoluntary participation by Member States, providing resettlement for a meaningful number of refugees, having regard to the overall number of refugees seeking protection in the Union;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 491 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines that, in so far as resettlement remains unavailable for third- country nationals, all Member States should be encouraged to establish and implement humanitarian admission programmes on a voluntary basis;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 561 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Calls for the overhaul of the Dublin system so that the burden and responsibilities are shared among all Member States; is of the opinion that such a new system should include effective and speedy return, organised by Frontex, of those people who do not qualify for international protection or have entered the EU illegally, and a set of measures that limit and discourage secondary movement within the EU, including limiting some of the rights of the asylum seekers within the scope of EU and international law;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 575 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Recommends that the criteria on which the Relocation Decisions are based should be built directly into the Union's standard rules for allocating responsibility; emphasises that, in reviewing the Dublin Regulation, it is important to reflect on the value of describing certain asylum seekers as 'applicants in clear need of international protection', since those migrants and refugees who do not fall into that category would still – at least under the current system – have to be dealt with by the Member State of first arrival; to this end, calls for a clear distinction to be made between those in need of international protection and economic migrants;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 583 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Takes the view that the European Union should support the Member States at the external borders of the EU as well as those receiving the most asylum claims with proportionate and adequate financial and technical support; considers that the rationale of using solidarity and responsibility-sharing measures is to enhance the quality and functioning of the CEAS;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 744 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. UnderstandEmphasises that the safe return of those people who, following an individual assessment of their asylum application, are determined not to be eligible for protection in the Union is something that must be carried out as part of the proper implementation of the CEAS;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 747 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. Understands that the safe return of those people who, following an individual assessment of their asylum application, are determined not to be eligible for protection in the Union is something that must be carried out as part of the proper implementation of the CEAS; stresses that the role and mandate of Frontex in return operations needs to be bolstered and that it is extremely important to make a distinction between asylum seekers and economic migrants since, legally speaking, they are two distinct groups and each requires a distinct approach;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 786 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Suggests that any attempt by Member States to 'push back' migrants who have not been given the opportunity to present asylum claims runs contrary to Union and iInternational lLaw, and that the Commission should take the appropriate action against any Member State that attempts such 'push backs'; at the same time, understands that any attempt for illegal crossing of the external EU borders through other than the official border crossings zones necessitates higher vigilance and precaution by the border guards of the Member States in order to guarantee the security of European citizens;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 870 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
61. Understands that the recently proposed European Border and Coast Guard is intended to replace Frontex and is meant to ensure a European integrated border management at the external borders, including Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia, with a view to managing migration effectively and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union, while safeguarding the free movement of persons therein; considers the concept of shared responsibility as a way to assist the frontline Member States at the external borders and strengthen their border management capacities; is of the opinion that shared responsibility and the new Agency should not undermine national competencies and sovereignty;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 891 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
64. Acknowledges that the integrity of the Schengen area and the abolishment of internal border controls are dependent on having effective management of external borders, with high common standards applied by all Member States at the external borders and an effective exchange of information between them; recalls in that sense that Member States such as Bulgaria and Romania located at the EU external borders, which are not yet members of the Schengen area, are fulfilling their obligations to effectively secure EU external borders, following the principles of solidarity and shared responsibility.
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 905 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65
65. Accepts that the Union needs to strengthen its external border protection and further develop the CEAS, and that measures are necessary to enhance the capacity of the Schengen Area to address the new challenges facing Europe and preserve the fundamental principles of security and free movement of persons; condemns calls for the introduction of permanent border controls within the Schengen zone; is the opinion that border checks within Schengen have to remain a temporary measure within the scope of the Schengen acquis;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 920 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
69. Takes note that on 15 December 2015, the Commission came forward with a proposal for a targeted revision of the Schengen Borders Code, proposing to introduce systematic controls of all Union nationals (not only on third-country nationals) against the relevant databases at the land, maritime and air external borders of the Schengen Area; is of the opinion that such systematic checks should be conducted at certain border crossings based on risk assessment and that they should not impede the free circulation of EU citizens, goods and services;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 965 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74
74. Recognises that one of the main purposes of hotspots is to allow the Union to grant protection and humanitarian assistance in a swift manner to those in need; emphasises that great care needs to be taken to ensure that the categorising of migrants at hotspots is carried out in full respect for the rights of all migrants; acknowledges, however, that proper identification of applicants for international protection at the point of first arrival in the Union should help facilitate the overall functioning of any reformed CEAS; calls in this connection for stringent registration of all migrants in line with the relevant EU acquis;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 967 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 a (new)
74a. Calls also for the establishment of hotspots in the main transit countries and countries of origin where people will receive explanations on the ways to legally migrate to the EU and will have the right to apply for the resettlement programme of the EU;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1036 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86
86. Recalls that the Union has intensified its external cooperation with third countries in migration and asylum in order to respond adequately to the current refugee crisis, and has launched new cooperation initiatives, such as the EU-Turkey Joint Action Plan; emphasises, in that respect, the need for all parties to fulfil their commitments deriving from the Joint Action Plan, including addressing the root causes leading to the massive influx of Syrians, stepping up cooperation for the support of Syrians under temporary protection and their host communities in Turkey, and for Turkey to fulfil its commitments to prevent irregular migration flows from its territory to the Union; calls for the swift implementation of the EU-Turkey readmission agreement as of June 2016;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1058 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88
88. Welcomes the fact that the Action Plan on Smuggling links the launching of new awareness-raising campaigns to the assessment of existing ones; recommends that any such campaigns should contain information on the criteria to be used to determine protection status in the Union, since such information may convince some migrants – who risk embarking on a perilous journey only to be returned if they are not granted protection – not to make the journey; recommends to involve diasporas communities to co-design information campaigns and to inform about legal routes and the risks of using smugglers.
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1141 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 101
101. Recommends that, under the MFF review scheduled for the end of 2016, substantial additional resources be provided under the Union budget, Heading 3, on Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice, so that adequate funding is made available on the basis of migration trends and the attendant financial requirements for the Union’s and the Member States’ asylum, migration and integration policies, especially in the Member States at the external borders and those receiving most of the asylum applications;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1232 #

2015/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 119
119. Recalls that in the Agenda on Migration, the Commission announced its intention to revise the Directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third- country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment (the ‘Blue Card Directive’), looking particularly at the issues of scope (possibly covering entrepreneurs willing to invest in Europe) and improving the rules on intra-EU mobility; calls on the Commission, when reviewing the Directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third country citizens for the purposes of highly- qualified employment, to take into account the success achieved by local and regional authorities;
2016/02/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 40 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas combating radicalisation cannot be limited to Islamic radicalisation; whereas religious radicalisation and violent extremism also affect the entire African continent; whereas political radicalisation also affected Europe in 2011, in Norway with the attacks perpetrated by Anders Behring Breivik;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 61 #

2015/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Embraces the fact that priority has been given to combating radicalisation through the deepening of cooperation with Sahel countries under the EU Sahel Regional Action Plan; notes that the issue should also form the basis for political dialogue and action plans in bilateral relations and with regional players such as the African Union and the League of Arab States;
2015/07/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. calls on the Commission to establish a common definition of ‘foreign fighters’ and to carry out an in-depth study of the process and, the various influences and the vulnerability factors which lead to radicalisation;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 179 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to publish guidelines on measures to be implemented in Europe’s prisons aimed at preventing Europeans from becoming radicalised; recommends that the Member States segregate radicalised inmates within their prisons in order to prevent radicalism from being imposed through intimidation on other inmates and to contain radicalisation in those institutions; recalls that public youth protection institutions or detention or rehabilitation centres may also become places of radicalisation for minors, who constitute a particularly vulnerable target.
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 204 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages the establishment of educational programmes in Europe’s prisons in order to promote critical thinking, religious tolerance, and reintegration into society to inmates vulnerable to pressure from radicals in prison;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 255 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Feels that the internet giants should be made aware of their responsibilities so that they delete illegal content as quickly as possible; believes that the Member States should plan for the possibility of bringing criminal prosecutions against digital actors who do not take action in response to the spread of manifestly illicit messages or messages praising terrorism on their internet platforms; believes that refusal or failure to cooperate on the part of internet platforms which allow such messages to circulate should be considered an act of complicity with praising terrorism and should consequently be punished; to that effect, calls on the Commission to address, in the context of the European Forum with the IT sector, the question of training and forming teams that will be tasked, within internet platforms, for deciding whether to delete manifestly illicit content;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 274 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Feels, however, that the internet is an effective platform for spreading discourse opposed to hate speech and praise for terrorism; calls on the digital giants to cooperate with the Member States in order to take part in the spread of prevention messages calling for the development of critical thinking and for a process of deradicalisation; calls on the European Commission and the Member States to work closely with civil society organisations for the purposes of reinforcing the channels for distributing discourse and to propose adequate training for key persons and opinion makers at the local level;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 294 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. States that the internet giants, through internet referencing, have the power to promote radicalisation prevention messages aimed at countering messages that praise terrorism; feels that it is thus their duty to highlight messages that oppose hate speech and praise for terrorism, thereby making online radicalisation more difficult; believes that the technique of blocking may be circumvented and must therefore be accompanied by the de-indexing of websites inciting terrorism, which makes it possible for these websites not to be shown on the first pages of search engine results, thus considerably reducing the frequency with which the website is visited;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 582 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Also stresses the need to strengthen political dialogue and shared action plans to combat radicalisation and terrorism, in the context of bilateral relations and with regional organisations such as the African Union and the League of Arab States;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 604 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. States that a comprehensive approach to preventing the radicalisation and recruitment of EU citizens by terrorist organisations can only be successfully put in place if accompanied by measures to deradicalise EU citizens beguiled by terrorist rhetoric; calls on the European Union therefore to facilitate the sharing by Member States and with third countries which have already acquired experience and achieved positive results in this area of good practices in regard to putting in place deradicalisation structures to prevent EU citizens leaving the EU or to control their return thereto;
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 661 #

2015/2063(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the candidate countries, the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the African Union, the member states of the Union for the Mediterranean, the League of Arab States and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
2015/07/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas digitalisation has an enormous impact on the labour market by changing value chains and creating new job opportunities and more flexible working patterns; whereas women, in particular, face possible negative consequences such as the erosion of workers’ riopportunities for flexible and teleworking work arrangements broughts and working time boundaries as well as boundaries of professional and non- professional responsibilities, increasing low-paid and less secure types of employment andbout by digitalisation may serve as a an effective tool for better reconciliation of professional and domestic duties for both women and men; whereas these flexible working arrangement and digital technologies which facilitate work from home could also contributinge to the challenge of maintaining a work-life balancinclusion into the labour market of disadvantaged groups of women, such as women with disabilities or with caring duties which require presence at home;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas improving digital skills and IT-literacy among women and boosting inclusion of women into the ICT which is one of the highest paying sectors could contribute to their financial empowerment and independence resulting in the reduction of the total gender wage gap;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, in the digitalised labour market, responsibility is increasingly shifted away from the company to the individuation offers new opportunities for entrepreneurship for women, including small scale digital entrepreneurship which in many cases does not require significant initial, changapital as well as enterprises pursued withing the termsframework of social security membership of the self-employed and freelancers; whereas digitalisation often uncouples the ponomy which enhance social inclusion; whereas there is need to support female digital entrepreneurship as women constitute only 19 per cent of entrepreneurs in this sector; whereas digitalisation of the labour market is likely to increase micro entrepreneurship, self-employment and freelance of work from the enterprise, challengingwhich in cases of multiple individual contracts within various companies and institutions may render the monitoring of the principle of equal pay for equal work at the same workplace, which is of utmost importance for a truly equal society, more challenging;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the entry of more women into the ICT sector would boost a market in which labour shortages are foreseen and in which an equal participation of women would lead to a gain of around EUR 9 billion for EU GDP each year; whereas in the existing male-dominated workforce leads to many women leaving the ICT sector within a few years of completrealities women remain heavily underrepresented in ICT degrees where they constitute only around 20 per cent of graduates ing their university degree field;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 40 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas the ICT sector is characterised by particularly high vertical and horizontal segregation as well as a gap between women's educational qualifications and their position in the ICT sector; whereas women's share in the ICT sector amounts to less than 20 per cent; whereas the majority (54 per cent) of women in ICT jobs occupy lower paid and lower skill-level positions and only a small minority of them (8 per cent) occupy high skill software engineer positions; whereas women are also underrepresented in the decision-making within this sector with only 19,2 per cent of ICT sector workers having female bosses compared to 45,2 per cent of non-ICT sector worker;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas women over 55 are at a particular risk of unemployment and labour market inactivity with the average EU employment rate for women aged 55- 64 being only 42 per cent compared to 58 per cent in case of men; whereas low level of IT literacy and e-skills further amplifies this risk; whereas improving and investing in digital competences of women over 55 would boost their employment opportunities and offer a level of protection against exclusion from the labour market;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas new communication and information technologies are used to create channels and platforms which facilitate the expansion of prostitution, also involving minors; whereas universal accessibility and easiness of using these new digital channels as well as anonymity they offer contribute to widening of the spectrum of potential actors involved, in particular among the most vulnerable groups in terms of sexual abuse, such as teenage girls; whereas there is a need for relevant law enforcement professionals to recognize the transformations in the way prostitution is carried out through the digital medium as well as to monitor relevant Internet platforms from this perspective, when there is a justified reason for suspecting a crime; whereas there is also a need to raise awareness among relevant education professionals about these new forms of digital threats in order to safeguard minors;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
H b. whereas social awareness about digital forms of violence both among the general public and the relevant professionals, such as law enforcement agents and teachers, remains insufficient to ensure adequate prevention, monitoring and assistance for victims; whereas different forms of online violence are not yet fully reflected in the criminal law as well as modes and procedures of prosecution in all member states; whereas there is a need for a recognition at the EU-level of the potentially transborder nature of the abuse and violence on the Internet;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 64 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
H c. whereas low participation of women and girls in ICT related education and later in employment is a result of a complex interplay of gender stereotyping that starts at early stages of life and education and continues to professional career; whereas factors limiting women and girls from participating in the ICT education and employment include: lifelong stereotyping, segregation into "typically female and male" activities, hobbies and toys that starts at the earliest levels of education, a relative lack of female role models in the ICT sector as well as the limited visibility of women in this sector especially in leadership positions;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 112 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and social partners to promote gender equality in ICT companies, representative bodies and training institutions and to closely monitor and follow up the progress made as well as share best practices in this area;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 121 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Commission and the Member States to safeguard fundamental workers’ rights and the socmonitor changing work patterns and potential protecliferation of employees and to combat precariousatypical working conditions; urges the Commission to propose, and the Member States to further develop, new protection mechanisms adapted to thetracts that accompanies digitalisation to ensure that types of contracts applied correspond to the nature of performed working and career patterns shaped by digitalisation, paying particular attention to the situation of womenincludes appropriate measures of social protection, as defined by the labour law in the individual Member States;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 128 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the digitalisatEncourages the Commission ofand the labour market requires adaptation of both labour market policies and the underlying social security systems; callsMember States to recognize the full potential of flexibility offered by digitalisation in the area of work-life balance; on the Commission and the Member States, with regard to the Commission's roadmap 'New start to address the challenges of work-life balance faced by working families’,' to address the impactidentify the opportunities and challenges of digitalisation oin workers with care responsibthe area of reconciliaties, as regards working conditions and the need for adaptation of the workplace, skills development and lifelong learning opportunitieson of work and family duties for both women and men to ensure that the flexibility sector is used to improve work-life balance;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 130 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support life-long learning as well as training and schemes which prepare for a better adaptation or potential change of career path according to the growing demand for e-skills in many different sectors with a special regard to women over 55 in order to safeguard them from the exclusion from the labour market;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 140 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Encourages Member States to introduce age appropriate ICT education at early stages with a particular focus on inspiring girls to develop interest and talent in the digital field and to safeguard them from constraining and negative stereotypes as well as segregation of activities and toys whereby digital-related themes are associated with "natural predispositions of boys" which discourage girls to advance their e-skills;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 160 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission, within the scope of the Digital Single Market Strategy, and more specifically with regard to the reference to building an inclusive e- society, to increase the visibility of women in technology by starting an endowed professorship for women in ICT, setting up a pilot project on a European online university specifically focused on ICT and technical engineering and introducing a tailored scholarship programme for women in the area of ICT and new media;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 186 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for identification of the challenges posed by the use of ICT and the internet to commit crimes, issue threats or perpetrate violence against women based on misogyny, homophobia or transphobia; urges policymakers to address these issues properly taking into account the challenges related to online anonymity and potential transborder nature of such crimes and abuses;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 199 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider the changed realities of women and girls, on account of digitalisation, in the implementation of future EU data protection legislation; emphasises that data controllers may only use sensitive data for limited purposes and may under no circumstances further share such data;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 205 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to launch and support e-literacy and training programmes, as well as awareness campaigns, thereby raising awareness of the potential risks of the digital world and how to counter them among relevant parties concerned, such as students at all levels of education, teachers, education and law enforcement professionals; calls on the Commission to promote campaigns against stereotypes in social media and digital media;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 212 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls for the EU institutions, agencies and bodies, as well as the Member States and their law enforcement agencies, to cooperate and concretely coordinate their actions to counter the use of ICT to commit crimes related to trafficking in human beings, cyber-harassment and cyber- stalking as they are often transborder in nature and a European-level coordination is vital for persecuting these crimes; calls on the Member States to review and potentially revise their criminal law to ensure that new forms of digital violence are clearly defined and recognized as well as that appropriate modes of persecution are in place; calls for the EU Cybersecurity Strategy and the Europol Cybercrime Centre to cover these issues; calls on the Commission to promote training and capacity-building for victim support in digital matters, for police and judicial authorities, as well as psychological support during court cases related to the issue;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 215 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Calls on the Member States to sign and ratify the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence and calls on the European Commission to initiate the necessary steps for the accession of the European Union to the Convention, as outlined in the recently issued EC Roadmap on EU Accession to the Istanbul Convention; stresses that ratification of the Council of Europe Convention is instrumental to eradication of violence against women, including digital forms of violence since it introduces harmonized legal definitions and modes of prosecution of crimes that are facilitated by the new communication technologies, such as trafficking in human beings and stalking;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 3 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 20 April 2015 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP),
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the association agreements signed with certain partner countries are a means of promoting sustainable far- reaching reforms;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the EU firmly condemns all forms of human rights violations, including violence against women and girls, rape, slavery, crimes of honour, forced marriages, child labour and female genital mutilation;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas since the introduction of the new approach in 2011, political developments in the neighbourhood have demonstrated that the EU needs to further rethink relations with its neighbours, taking into account the different external and internal realities; whereas the EU needs to address new challenges in itboth its internal realities and the changing situations in neighbouring countries; whereas new challenges are emerging for the EU’s neighbourhood, and the EU therefore needs to adjust itsthe strategyic compass of the ENP by examining itsthe interests that it shares with its neighbours, charting common goals and priorities, and assessing itsthe appropriate policy tools, and its incentives and available resources and their attractiveness to its partners; whereas the EU will be attractive to neighbouring countries in so far as it enables partner countries to become fully involved in setting priorities;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the consultation process carried out by the Commission should be comprehensive and inclusive so as to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are consulted; whereas the importance to encourage women's rights and gender equality organisations to participate in this consultation process should be stressed;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 114 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance and timeliness of the review of the ENP; emphasises that the revised ENP should be able to provide a quick and adequate response to the situation on the ground, while also putting forward a long-term vision for developing relations with the neighbouring countries; calls for Parliament to be involved in the implementation of the new ENP and regularly briefed on its progress in partner countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes in the continued value of its initially stated objective of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, based on the founding values and principles of the Union, through a deep structural transformation in the neighbouring countries and a shared commitment to recognising and upholding those foundations; stresses therefore the need to go back to basics and bring this objective back to the top of the agenda;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 142 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that respect for the universal fundamental values of human rights, including the rights of women and children, rule of law and democracy on which the EU is founded must remain at the core of the revised policy;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the renewed policy must be more strategic, with a real political vision, and politically driven; maintains that the partnership with the Mediterranean countries is as crucially important as the Eastern Partnership; calls for special envoys to be appointed for the East and the South, with the task of politically coordinating the revised policy; notes that the appointment of such special envoys could make for balance between the two parts of the EU’s neighbourhood and in terms of the EU’s commitment to them;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 193 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges that short-, medium- and long- term priorities and strategic objectives be defined, bearing in mind that the ENP should aim to create different levels of cooperation in different areas among and with the ENP countries; stresses that in defining its approach the EU should look at its priorities and those of the individual countries concerned, together with their level of development, considering the interests of society on the whole and not only those of the political elite; is convinced that economic and political empowerment of women should form indispensable part of these priorities in order to achieve an inclusive society;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that local ownership and inclusiveness should be key aspects of the new approach so as to ensure that the benefits of the ENP reach all levels of society throughout the country; maintains that the EU delegations have a major role to play in placing relations on such a footing and in implementing the ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU to improve its coordination with other donors and international financial institutions and callsstresses the need for joint programming with its Member States; considers that better coordination with the Member States is necessary in order to achieve a common approach to the short- and medium-term goals of the EU’s cooperation with neighbouring countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Maintains that the revamped ENP has to strike a balance between the two parts of the neighbourhood, not least in terms of political and diplomatic engagement; notes that from that point of view the EU institutions and the Member States should all follow the same even- handed approach;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 311 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers support for democracy, the rule of law and, human rights, and fundamental freedoms to be central to the ENP; stresses that the EU should be willing to offer incentives and know-how to help overcome the political, economic, and social challenges and economic costs of undertaking democratic reforms;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the continuous need to focus on strengthening and consolidating democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the justice system, gender equality and respect for minorities and diversity; highlights that capacity-building in national institutions, including their national assemblies, together with support for civil society, pro- democracy groups, women's rights and gender equality organisations and political parties, will enhance political dialogue and pluralism;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 328 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the continuous need to focus on strengthening and consolidating democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the justice system, respect for minoritiewomen’s rights, minority rights and diversity; highlights that capacity-building in national institutions, including their national assemblies, together with support for civil society, pro- democracy groups and political parties, will enhance political dialogue and pluralism;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 338 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Notes that political parties and political groups in the Parliaments of the EU Member States and the European Parliament can play a decisive role in supporting political parties favourable to democracy;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 349 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the importance of promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women - through education, training and full respect of their rights - as part of democratic reform and underlines that this should be reflected in the political and strategic dimensions of the ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 364 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the ENP to be developed into a more tailor-made and flexible policy framework able to adapt to the diversity that exists; underlines that differentiation should take place not only between Eastern and Southern partners but also among the ENP countries themselves; notes that differentiation must not be pursued to the detriment of the aim of regional integration between the countries of the southern and eastern neighbourhoods;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 458 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to actively promote and assist in the peaceful settlement of conflicts in the regioncountries in the EU’s neighbourhood, using different tools and instruments, on the basis of the added value they may provide – such measures include its EU Special Representatives, confidence-building programmes and CSDP missions;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 461 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to actively promote and assist in the peaceful settlement of conflicts in the region, with respect to the provisions of the UN Security Council resolution 1325, using different tools and instruments, on the basis of the added value they may provide – such measures include its EU Special Representatives, confidence-building programmes and CSDP missions;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 475 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Notes that, with regard to security, the ENP could also help to prevent conflicts and contribute to mediation; observes in this respect that the Union’s delegations play a key role in establishing early warning systems by building up finely meshed prevention networks with the various civil-society organisations;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 501 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls for the revised policy to strengthen the existing platforms for cooperation, namely the Union for the Mediterranean and the Eastern Partnership, to further support regional integration when the priorities identified by the partners are similar for a specific policy field and to bring partners closer towhile maintaining a balance among them, to further support regional integration; notes that the European Union can play a leading role in promoting political dialogue among the countries in its neighbourhood, and must encourage ther in terms of economic standards and legislationm to define specific regional integration projects whose implementation it can then support;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 511 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Underlines the importance of the role of multilateral assemblies, such as EuroNest and PA-UfM, as fora for political dialogue and a tool for fostering ownership of the Neighbourhood Policy, as well as of the Conference of Regional and Local Authorities for the Eastern Partnership (CORLEAP) and Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM), which enable local and regional representatives to engage in dialogue with the European Union Institutions and to pursue economic, social and local and regional cooperation;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 557 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls for the EU to explore and identify, together with its partners, priorities for integration in different policy fields, such as economic development, infrastructure and regional development, the environment, trade, education and vocational training, competition policies, SMEs, migration, security, energy and energy efficiency, with the aim of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 562 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the trend of the externalisation of internal policiaim of achieving coherence in the internal and external policies of the European Union, and the close and growing links between certain internal and external issues, should be reflected in the new ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 580 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Stresses the importance of free movement of people, and supports enhancing visa facilitation and visa liberalisation within the neighbourhood, particularly for students, young people and researchers; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to further enhance mobility partnerships within the neighbourhood and develop possibilities for circular migration schemes, which would encourage and reward regular migrants; on the other hand, condemns trafficking in human beings, most of the victims of which are women, and stresses the importance of reinforcing the cooperation with partner countries in order to combat it;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 583 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Stresses the importance of free movement of people, and supports enhancing visa facilitation and visa liberalisation within the neighbourhood, particularly for students, young people and researchers; stresses that the negotiations on agreements to facilitate the issuing of visas also constitute a lever for the promotion of the values and aims of the ENP; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to further enhance mobility partnerships within the neighbourhood and develop possibilities for circular migration schemes, which would encourage and reward regular migrants and would confer reciprocal economic benefits on the EU and its neighbours;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 584 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Calls on the Commission to pay attention to the gender equality perspective when promoting vocational and academic trainings, as well as in the framework of circular migration programmes with the neighbour countries in order to strengthen women's participation to their economies;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 596 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that high unemployment, particularly among young people, social exclusion and poverty, combined with the low political participation of women, are root causes of instability, and demands engagement beyond the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs);
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 162 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In cases where there is a specific and disproportionate pressure at the external borders, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate rapid border interventions and deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool as well as technical equipment. Rapid border interventions should provide reinforcement in situations where immediate response is required and where such an intervention would provide an effective response. To ensure the effective operation of such intervention, Member States should make a sufficient number of qualified border guards and other relevant staff available to the rapid reserve pool, unless they are facing an exceptional situation that is impacting significantly on the discharge of national-level tasks.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 176 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In cases where a Member State does not take the necessary corrective action in line with the vulnerability assessment or in the event of disproportionate migratory pressure at the external borders, rendering the control at the external border ineffective to an extent which risks putting in jeopardyises the functioning of the Schengen areapublic order and internal security in the EU, a unified, rapid and effective response should be delivered at Union level. For this purpose, and to ensure better coordination at Union level, the Commission should identify the measures to be implemented by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and require the Member State concerned to cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of those measures. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should then determine the actions to be taken for the practical execution of the measures indicated in the Commission decision, and an operational plan should be drawn up with the Member State concerned.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 230 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the development and implementation of a system of integrated management of the external borders, thus also ensuring the proper functioning of the Schengen area, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting in an uncoordinated manner but can rather, because of the absence of controls at internal borders and in view of the significant migratory pressures at the external borders and the need to safeguard a high level of internal security within the Union, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 233 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39 a (new)
(39a) As regards Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia, this Regulation constitutes a development of the Schengen acquis in which these Member States take part in accordance with their Accession Treaties. Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia therefore take part in the adoption of this Regulation and are bound by it and subject to its application.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 239 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
A European Border and Coast Guard is hereby set up to ensure a European integrated border management at the external borders of the Member States of the European Union with a view to managing migration effectively and ensuring a high level of internal security within the entire Union, while safeguarding the free movement of persons therein.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 246 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘external borders’ means the land and sea borders of the Member States of the European Union and their airports and seaports, to which the provisions of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council 38 apply; __________________ 38 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1).
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 323 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall facilitate the application of Union measures relating to the management of external borders by reinforcing, assessing and coordinating the actions of Member States in the implementation of those measures, and in return. Member States shall ensure the management of their section of the external borders, in their interests and in interest of all Member States which have abolished internal border control, in full compliance with Union law and in accordance with the technical and operational strategy referred to in Article 3(2), and in close cooperation with the Agency.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 331 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall be responsible for the management of the external borders in the cases foreseen in this Regulation, in particular where the necessary corrective measures based on the vulnerability assessment are not taken or in the event of disproportionate migratory pressure, rendering the control of the external borders ineffective to such an extent that it risks putting in jeopardyises the functioning of the Schengen areapublic order and internal security in the European Union.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 344 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. To ensure a coherent European integrated border management at all EU external borders, the Agency shall facilitate and render more effective the application of existing and future Union measures relating to the management of external borders, in particular the Schengen Borders Code established by Regulation (EC) No 562/2006.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 350 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre with the capacity to monitor security threats to the external borders of the EU including migratory flows and to carry out risk analysis as regards all aspects of integrated border management;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 360 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) assist EU Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance at the external borders, especially at the external borders of those EU Member States facing specific and disproportionate pressures, by coordinating and organising joint operations, taking into account that some situations may involve humanitarian emergencies and rescue at sea;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 380 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) deploy the necessary equipment and staff for the rapid reserve pool for the practical execution of the measures needed to be taken in a situation requiring urgent action at the external borders of the Member States of the EU;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 382 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) assist EU Member States, especially those facing specific and disproportionate pressures, in circumstances requiring increased technical assistance and operational assistance for implementing the obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals, including through the coordination or organisation of return operations;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 394 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point p
(p) provide the necessary assistance for the development and operation of a European border surveillance system and, as appropriate, to encourage the development of a common information-sharing environment, including interoperability of systems, in particular by developing, maintaining and coordinating the Eurosur framework in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 420 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
The national authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, shall provide the Agency in a timely and accurate manner with all the information necessary for the Agency to perform the tasks conferred on it by this Regulation, in particular for the Agency to monitor thereats to the public order and internal security of the EU including migratory flows towards and within the Union, to carry out risk analysis and to perform the vulnerability assessment.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 447 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The risk analysis prepared by the Agency shall cover all aspects relevant to the European integrated border management, in particular border control, return, irregular secondary movements of third-country nationals within the Union, the prevention of cross-border crime including facilitation of irregular immigration, trafficking in human being and terrorism, as well as the situation in neighbouring third countries with a view to developing a pre-warning mechanism which analyses, inter alia, the migratory flows towards the Union.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 496 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall assess the technical equipment, systems, capabilities, resources and contingency plans of the Member States regarding border control. That assessment shall be done in cooperation with the Member States of the EU and shall be based on information provided by the Member State and by the liaison officer, on information derived from Eurosur, in particular the impact levels attributed to the external land and sea border sections of each Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013, and on the reports and evaluations of joint operations, pilot projects, rapid border interventions and other activities of the Agency.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 512 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The aim of the vulnerability assessment is for the Agency to assess the capacity and readiness of Member States to face upcoming challenges, including present and future threats and pressures at the external borders, to identify, especially for those Member States facing specific and disproportionate pressures, possible immediate consequences at the external borders and subsequent consequences on the functioning of the Schengen areapublic order and internal security in the EU, and to assess their capacity to contribute to the rapid reserve pool referred to in Article 19(5) while taking into account their national needs. That assessment is without prejudice to the Schengen evaluation mechanism.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 519 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Member States may provide written comments to the vulnerability assessment if they deem so; these written comments shall be attached to the vulnerability assessment.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 524 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. The results of the vulnerability assessment, together with the written comments of the Member States if available, shall be submitted to the Supervisory Board, which shall advise the Executive Director on the measures to be taken by the Member States based on the results of the vulnerability assessment, and taking into account the Agency’s risk analysis and the results of the Schengen evaluation mechanism.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 651 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where a Member State does not take the necessary corrective measures in accordance with a decision of the Management Board referred to in Article 12(6) or in the event of disproportionate migratory pressure at the external border, rendering the control of the external borders ineffective to such an extent that it risks putting in jeopardyises the functioning of the Schengen areapublic order and internal security in the EU, the Commission, after consulting the Agency, may adopt a decision by means of an implementing act, identifying the measures to be implemented by the Agency and requiring the Member State concerned to cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of those measures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 79(2).
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 688 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. On a proposal by the Executive Director, the Management Board shall decide by an absolute majority of its members with a right to vote on the profiles and the overall number of border guards to be made available for the European Border and Coast Guard Teams. The same procedure shall apply with regard to any subsequent changes in the profiles and the overall numbers. Member States shall contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard Teams through a national pool on the basis of the various defined profiles by nominating border guards corresponding to the required profiles and taking into account their own needs for ensuring the security of their external borders.
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 938 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) sharing and analysing information related to the risks at the maritime external borders of the EU taking into account their specificities;
2016/04/21
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 60 #

2015/0125(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) If a Member State other than Italy or Greece should be confronted with a similar emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State concerned, in line with Article 78(3) of the Treaty. Such measures may include, where appropriate, a suspension of the obligations of that Member State provided for in this Decision. Migration routes are extremely flexible and can change rapidly. In 2015, the eastern Mediterranean route from Turkey into Greece has surpassed the central Mediterranean route from North Africa to Italy as the main source of arrivals by sea. The route of the Black Sea from Turkey also registered a 193 % increase in the number of detections of illegal border-crossing in 2014. The Commission must thus closely monitor the situation on a permanent basis so as to introduce the necessary changes as regards Member States' obligation and to adapt to new circumstances.
2015/07/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers regrettable the absence of gender mainstreaming in the Europe 2020 strategy; and calls on the Commission and the Council to introduceconsider focusing more on a gender equality pillar in the strategy and having an overarching gender equality objective;
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes those country-specific recommendations (CSR) intended to advance gender equality, but considers it regrettable that the CSR on the whole have no gender dimension, specifically as regards labour market reforms; calls for specific equality policy guidance on reducing gender inequalities, in particular the gender pay gap, to be included in the aAnnual gGrowth sSurvey;
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its call on the Member States to incorporate the gender dimension into their stability and convergence programmes and national reform programmes through the setting of qualitative targets and measures that address persisting gender gaps and to systematically apply the principles of gender budgeting, which often results in women finding themselves below the poverty line at a later stage of their lives, and to systematically apply the principles of gender budgeting with a view to examining the current action programmes and policies, their effects on resource allocation, and their contribution to equality between women and men;
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to conduct a gender impact assessment of the structural reforms implemented so far;deleted
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 40 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that Member States should improve the participation rate of children and young adults in educational systems and should put more focus on the problem of early school leaving, especially by collecting information on its main causes with a view to adopting and implementing policies for its prevention;
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers it regrettable thatWelcomes the Investment Plan for Europe is not ambitious enough in terms ofthat focuses on removing obstacles for investments that will foster job creation and investing in real needs such as childcare, care of dependent persons, including the elderly, care infrastructure and services.
2015/07/23
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas one in three women in the EU has experienced physical and/or sexual violence since she was 15 years old and 500 000 women in the EU have been subjected to female genital mutilation1;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits all forms of inhuman or degrading treatment;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the violence suffered by women includes physical, sexual and psychological abuse, child abuse, sexual harassment and stalking, also because of the new technologies and the internet, and whereas in some cases this violence results insexual abuse, rape, stalking, domestic violence and, in extreme cases, femicides and/or so-called crimes of honour and constitutes a violation of women’s fundamental right to dignity, equal treatment and access to justice;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas, according to the findings of an investigation conducted in 2014 by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights, most women who have been subjected to violence do not report what has happened to the police;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to promote a strategy andfor taking more incisive action plan to combat all forms of violence against womengender violence and homophobia, improvinge prevention and providinge proper protection and assistance to victims, paying special attention to the most vulnerable people, such as children, and the elderly and victims of multiple discrimination; calls on the Commission also to declare 2016 European Year against Violence against Women;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 61 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is alarmed at the under-representation of women in decision-making processes, companieCalls on the European institutions to pay greater attention to the finding that a mere 17.8% of board members of the largest publicly listed companies in the EU are women and the fact that women continue to be under-represented in politics and in the politicaleconomic spheres;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 78 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to give the National Institutes for Gender Equality independence anthe resources they need financial autonomy so that they can order to acquire the necessary staff and play an authoritative role;
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 94 #

2014/2254(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to make it easier for women who have been subjected to violence to gain access to justice, and to promote the exchange of best practice.
2015/04/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 262 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point c
(c) ensuring the full involvement, at the launch and dialogue stages, not only of the Commission and the Member State in question, but also of the European Parliament, the Council, national parliaments, the FRA, the EIGE and civil society, and guaranteeing the use of all available data;
2015/05/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 274 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Guarantee better coordination and consistency between the activities of Parliament, the Council of Europe, the FRA and the EIGE;
2015/05/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 300 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Deplores recent instances of anti-Semitic and anti-Islamic discrimination and violence; calls on Member States to protect freedom of religion or belief and to promote tolerance and intercultural dialogue;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 323 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the crucial role of education in preventing radicalisation and the rise of intolerance and extremism among young people;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 377 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Stresses that human trafficking and any form of exploitation are criminal activities becoming increasingly common in Europe and have been fuelled over recent years by the spiralling increase in the number of immigrants present inside and outside the EU. For this reason calls on the Commission to strengthen European legislation on human trafficking in order to improve harmonisation of the national laws of the Member States;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 473 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to keep the issue of violence against women high on the agenda as Gender-based violence is both a consequence of the inequalities between women and men as well as an obstacle to equality and therefore should not be tolerated; Furthermore calls on the Commission to encourage national ratifications and start the procedure for EU accession to the Istanbul Convention as quickly as possible; notes that the immediate accession of all Member States to the Istanbul Convention would lead to the development of an integrated policy and to the promotion of international cooperation in the fight against all forms of violence against women;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 479 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Calls on the EU to continue its work in ensuring equality between women and men in pay, pensions and participation in labour market, including in positions on top management. This action should help ensuring that Europe is making full use of all available talent;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 578 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Member States to reach an agreement as soon as possible on the proposal for a directive on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures, which will permit equality and women’s participation in economic decision making to be promoted in a tangible manner;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 601 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Urges the European Union and the Member States to step up their efforts to combat trafficking in human beings, which affects women and children in particular, in order to eliminate sexual exploitation and forced labour;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 610 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Stresses that the children’s rights should be fulfilled without discrimination on any grounds, regardless of their parents’ ethnic origin, nationality, religion and social, migration or residence status;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 612 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 f (new)
13f. Calls on the Member States to implement Directive 2011/93/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, and child pornography, and to strengthen the legal ability, technical capabilities and financial resources of law enforcement authorities in order to increase cooperation, including with Europol, with a view to investigating and dismantling child sex offender networks more efficiently, while prioritising the rights and safety of the children involved;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 643 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – indent 1
– save the lives of persons in danger, including outside European territorial waters;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 654 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – indent 2
– improve legal avenues for refugees through the full transposition of the Asylum Package;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 667 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – indent 3
monitor the effective implementation of existing provisions before introduceing new procedures for legal entry into the EU;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 674 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – indent 3 a (new)
– grant special protection to the most vulnerable categories of migrants – women and minors – whether accompanied or not;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 685 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the importance of respecting and protecting the rights of refugees and migrants, while special attention should be paid to women and children migrants; stresses the obligation to comply with international human rights conventions, particularly the Geneva Convention on the status of refugees and the principle of non-refoulement; Underlining the need for having External Relations, Development policy and Humanitarian aid interlinked and coordinated with Internal Policies for migration and internal security in order to be successful. This will require a more targeted approach including additional resources and efforts and better cooperation also amongst the competent EU institutions;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 730 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls for assistance to be provided to those Member States situated at the external borders of the Union to help them address systematic weaknesses in the reception conditions and asylum procedures, which are aggravated by the increase in the number of asylum-seekers;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 55 #

2014/2251(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that sensitisation campaigns should target men as well as women, since they (consciously or unconsciously) reproduce gender stereotypes which can cause women to internalise cultural and institutional barriers to career progress in science;
2015/06/24
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas education and training of girls and women is an important European value, a fundamental human right and an essential element for the empowerment of girls and women at social, cultural and professional level, as well as for the full enjoyment of all other social, economic, cultural and political rights;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas poverty has a strong influence on equal access to education due to both direct and indirect costs of sending children to school, and access to education, in particular higher education, is especially difficult for young people from low-income families, which leads to a reinforcement of the traditional preference for education for boys;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 13 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas according to a study conducted by the Directorate General for Internal Policies of the European Parliament, 30 million females of primary school age are globally out of the education system;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the concept of gender is a social construct linked to issues of social class, ethnicity, religion, culture, sexuality and age which lgender stereotypes assign different, determined and limited roles to men and women and these roles are shaped through a multiplicity of social variables and disseminated or reproduced by parents, education and media; whereads to economic, cultural and educational injustices, andhese gender roles are integrated by individuals during thate social representations of gender are replicated at schoolisation phases of childhood and adolescence and therefore influence their lives and might limit women's and men's personal development;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. consideringwhereas the significant influence of family attitudemembers' opinions, of peers and teachers in the selection of students' study areas and changing gender stereotypes, and given that teachers as agents of social change, by their attitudes and teaching practices, are essential to the promotion of gender equality, also considering that school teachers can reach out to parents and raise their awareness on gender equality and their children's potential regardless of their gender;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas a gender perspective and gender equality should be incorporated into all levels of education in order to promote, among girls and boys, women and men, the values of justice and democratic citizenship, in order to build a genuine partnership between the genders with regard to public and private spheres;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas unskildata availabled and poorly paid work is commonly attributed to wottest that women are less well rewarded financially for their qualifications and experience than men and they continue to be responsible for most of the care within the family, which limits access to paid full- time employment, and that gender equality cannot be reduced to providing women with the standard of success defined by men, but involves the recognition of all the work done by women and the education of boys and men in the tasks from which theywhich are traditionally excludfeminised;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, even though more women have moreaccess to secondary and university education, their professional activity is mainly related to tasks aimed at reproducing and extending traditional social and economic structures and there is a need to increase the presence of women both in vocational education and in Mathematics, Science, Engineering and Technology;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 44 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas a more equal allocation of educational resources would result in a greater access of girls to the labour market and a balanced participation of women and men in the working market could foster the economic perspectives of the European Union;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the impact of gender stereotypes on education and training has strong implications for the labour market, where women still face both horizontal and vertical segregation, and whereas this contributes to certain sectors still being considered 'male' (with more than 85% men) and their pay levels consequently being higher than those of sectors considered 'female' (with more than 70% women);
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas European and national authorities should encourage gender equality in educational institutions by all means possible, and gender education should be a fundamental part of the curriculum and school programmes, and teaching materials may contain discriminatory content;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the formal curriculum reflectinfluences the cultural and social perspective of each Member State in the construction of girls' and boys' identity, the informal curriculum is a complement to the formal curriculum and the hidden curriculum is common to all the situational definitions of the curriculum and all of these are important in the construction of girls' and boys' identity, and local authorities, through their proximity to educational institutions, have a key role to play in informal education;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas, in order to fight gender inequality, constant pedagogical supervision of curricula, objectives, content, strategies, materials, evaluation, disciplinary programmes and lesson plans is essential, as well as monitoring and evaluation by educational research centres and specialists in gender equality;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas violence against women is the main impediment to equality between men and women and can be combatted through education; whereas not all EU countries have ratified the Istanbul Convention and the EU has responsibilities in the initiative and funding of projects that promote gender equality;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 91 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Asks the Commission that this recommendation be taken to the politicnational institutions responsible for implementing central, regional and local education policies, school management bodies and regional and local authorities;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 97 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges that all EU countries, and the EU itself as an institution, signReiterates its call on the Commission to initiate as soon as possible the procedure for EU accession to the Istanbul Convention, and work together for gender equality in countries outside the EU, on a trans-European basiss well as to encourage Member States to ratify it; underlines the close links between gender stereotypes, bullying, cyber bullying and violence against women, and the need to fight these from an early age;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 99 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls forEncourages all EU countries to invest consistently in the production of information and motivational campaigns for girls and boys to choose non- stereotyped professions, as well as reflecting on the influence of gender identities and perceptions on girls' life plansinformation and awareness raising campaigns in order to address gender stereotypes in the process of professional orientation, notably on sciences and new technologies, with a view to fully benefitting from the human capital represented by European girls and women, promoting discussion of educational and career choices in the classroom;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 113 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that girls who are not allowed to attend school are more exposed to domestic violence;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 115 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the need for national and local institutions to promote programmes to integrate migrant communities in schools and all minorities that make up the European social space, as well as financial assistance programmes for needy families in order to prevent students dropping out, particularly girls;deleted
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 131 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Insists on giving special attention to the gender dimensionequality in all its forms, in curricula, content, school programmes and lesson plans, as well as the need to assess the place of women in school curricula in various disciplines, highlighting their role in the content taught;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 136 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for the promotion of a gender perspective in education on sexuality and the emotions,Encourages the competent authorities in the Member States to promote gender equality in their sexual education program when provided, as well as in sport and leisure activities, where stereotypes and expectations based on gender can affect the self-image, health, acquisition of skills, intellectual development, social integration and identity construction of girls;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages girls and boys to try new roles, activities and educational areas,in the education process to take an equal interest in all subjects, in particular as regards scientific and technical subjects, also encouraging their equal participation of girls and boys in collective decision-making and school management, as well as in all extracurricular activities;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 157 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that informal education also plays a key role in confidence building for girls and young women;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 158 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the authors and publishers of educational materials to be aware of the need to make gender equality a criterion for the production of these materials, recommending the use of teams of teachers and students in the creation of training materials on gender equality;deleted
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 164 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the need to prepare and disseminate guidelines for schools, teachers and those responsible for setting the curriculum in order to embrace a gender perspective and gender equality, and asks teachers to analyse and eliminate stereotypes and sexist distortions that the teaching materials may include in their content, language and illustrations, encouraging them also to combat thiequality, and recommends that the training of teachers and other educational workers be directed towards fulfilling the requirements of a balanced gender policy in schools and in the academic curriculum; insists on the importance of training of young teachers as well as sexism in literature, film, music, games and other areas that contribute decisively to chperienced teachers - through life-long and regular trainings - which must aim at a deep understangding of the attitudes, behaviour and identity of boys and girlsreproduction of gender stereotypes at school and the necessary efforts to overcome them;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 169 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for the need to include, both in the initial and ongoing training of teachers, strategies to reflect on their own identity, beliefs, values, prejudices, expectations, attitudes and gender representations, as well as on their teaching practices, in order to remove any obstacles to realising girls' full potential;deleted
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 176 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for every effort to be made to ensure that employment in the area of early childhood education, primary education and care is promoted as validuable work for both women and men, reflecting on the relevance of using a system of quotas for men in these areas in the transitional arrangements;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 193 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. RCalls on the EIGE to continue its work on putting together gender specific data and scoreboards in all policy areas and reiterates the importance of conducting impact studies for educational policies on gender, providing qualitative and quantitative instruments for the assessment of this impact, and using a budgetary strategy based on gender to promote both access and the right to educational resources;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 200 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Suggests the creation of an Annual European Award for Gender Equality for educational institutions and encourages Member States to do the same at national level;deleted
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 204 #

2014/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to draw up plans of action and to allocate resources for the implementation of a gender equality programme, recommending the use of European instruments available for this purpose, namely the Investment Plan, the Horizon 2020 Programme and Community, the European Social Fund, as well as structural funds;
2015/05/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas historically women have been more affected by unemployment than men and that the women employment rate has slightly increased from 60% to 63% during the last five years; whereas women’s unemployment stands at 10 % across the EU, with significant regional variation;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas at university men remain over- represented in STEM subjects, which restricts economic opportunities for women; even though there are not scientific evidences that men are more talented than women in STEM subjects;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 40 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that SMEs make a significant contribution to the European economy, in particular by creating jobs; is disappointed that women lead SMEs to a much lesser extent than men; deplores that in the period 2003-2012 the women entrepreneurship rate has slightly increased from 10% to 10,4% ; calls on the Member States to exchange best practices for encouraging women to set up SMEs and to ease the access of women entrepreneurs to the financial support; is pleased that the European Regional Development Fund is providing support to women-led SMEs; asks the European Commission and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) to collect as quickly as possible more and better information on female entrepreneurship, and in particular access to financing and economic networks; encourages on the Member States to include, as part of secondary education, projects which can encourage entrepreneurship spirit among young people irrespective of gender; notes that female entrepreneurship also constitutes an opportunity to restructure the labour market in a way that benefits the family and gender equality;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 42 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that the under-representation of women in STEM subjects originates from gender stereotypes ; urges the Member States and the Commission to promote entry by women into sectors traditionally viewed as 'male' sectors, notably the sciences and new technologies, in particular through information and awareness-raising campaigns, with a view to benefiting fully from the human capital represented by European women;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine whether gender clauses might be included in public procurement tender notices in order to encourage businesses to strive towards gender equality in their ranks while complying with the EU legislation on competition ;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 2 #

2014/2230(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the final report of the EU Election Assessment Team (EAT) 2014 states that security concerns are one of the main impediments to women’s participation in the elections; whereas the report establishes a clear link between women’s political participation and rural/urban inequalities in access to public services; whereas women are under- represented in the political sphere and in top level political institutions;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2014/2230(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the 2004 Constitution holds men and women equal before the law; whereas implementation of constitutional and legislative provisions on gender equality remains uncompleted and that the situation of women and girls remains extremely worrying;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2014/2230(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that women’s and girls’ illiteracy is an obstacle to their involvement in public life; encourages the authorities to further address the obstacles to girls’ access to education, including early and forced marriage, early child bearing, lack of security and insufficient geographical coverage in terms of school infrastructure; underlines that girls' access to primary and secondary education is key to the development and stabilisation of the country ; is convinced that education is one of the most efficient means to women's empowerment and to fight against gender stereotypes;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 27 #

2014/2230(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for better enforcement of the law on elimination of violence against women under which prosecutions are few and convictions even fewer ; emphasises the importance of the fight against impunity and better access to formal justice.;
2015/03/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2014/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the political instability in the region is leading to significant increases in the number of refugees, who often risk their lives to flee, being victims of human trafficking, with the most vulnerable groups being women and children; whereas women’s participation in peace negotiations, peace-building and peace-keeping processes is key to achieving long-lasting results in this field;
2015/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21
– whereas the conflict in Syria, the conflict in Iraq, the crisis in Yemen and the situation in Libya are a major potential source of destabilisation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA); having regard to the junction between the Sahel and Middle Eastern fronts in the fight against terrorism and their proximity, in terms of security challenges, to the sensitive area of the Horn of Africa; having regard to the disastrous consequences of such a situation for the security of the whole region and of Europe; having regard to the number of civilian victims and the acts of terror committed against them; having regard to the serious humanitarian crisis caused by these conflicts, causing massive population displacements and creating enormous difficulties for refugees and their host communities; having regard to the difficulties in discerning a political approach and establishing a legitimate and reliable basis for inclusive dialogue with the various parties concerned; having regard to the resulting long-term damage to political and economic development, durable infrastructures and demographic cohesion in the region;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22
– whereas it is necessary to review EU action in the MENA area in the light of the implications of the Arab uprisings for the countries concerned, the new and complex situation thus created and the imperative need to combat the ISIS and counter the expansion of terrorist groups in the region generally; whereas stabilisation in the region is not a security issue alone but also has economic, political and social implications, requiring the Union to develop strategic global and multifaceted cooperation with all parties the region, in the medium and long term;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2014/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the EU to further include women’s rights and participation in its political and cultural dialogue with the countries of the region, including the League of Arab States;
2015/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2014/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Underlines that ensuring gender balance in its missions, delegations and mediation teams is also a way for the EU to promote women’s rights and participation in partner countries;
2015/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 103 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the emergence of ISIS is a symptom of the economic, political, social and cultural crisis afflind of the recurrent security and border management problems affecting the region; calls on the EU, together with the Arab world, to assess the root causes and adopt a global approach through an approach based on security, political, economic, social and cultural considerations;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the allocation of EUR one billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the Da'esh threat' , under which EUR 400 million has been earmarked for humanitarian aid; calls for special attention to be given to Jordan and Lebanon, responding to their urgent short-term needs while also envisaging, with these two partner countries, the possibility of a prolonged crisis and thus the need for long-term solutions that will help both the refugees and their host countries; is concerned that, as a result of extreme poverty and deprivation, refugee camps may become a hotbed of radicalisation; welcomes the funds for host populations under the new strategy and under the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP);
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the crucial importance of promoting improsystematic and effectived cooperation between the EU Member States and the MENA countries in combating terrorism; calls for closer cooperation with the Europol and Interpol countries, providing them with assistance in developing the necessary anti- terrorist structures and resources;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 248 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses its deep concern at the situation in Libya; stresses the need to maintain its territorial integrity and national unity; stresses that the Libyan crisis can only be resolved by means of dialogue that is as inclusive as possible, including with respect to women and young people;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 290 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Is convinced that cultural cooperation is essential in combating terrorism and any form of radicalism; stresses the utmost importance of promoting cultural and academic exchanges; urges partner countries to participate in EU cultural programmes; calls on the Commission to act on the European Parliament’s proposal for the creation of an ambitious Euro- Mediterranean Erasmus programme distinct from the Erasmus+ programme; emphasises that education and the development of minds capable of critical thinking also constitute a bastion against radicalisation for both Europe and the MENA region, and calls thus on the EU to support the investment needed in this regard;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 302 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda, taking into account the use of digital tools, the Internet and social networks; underlines the need to send a positive message regarding relations between the European Union and the MENA countries and cooperation between them; stresses the need to ensure much greater visibility for EU initiatives in the region than is now the case;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the importance of developing direct dialogue with civil societies in the MENA countries in order to understand their expectations more clearly; stresses its support for the consultation and enhancement of civil society and new generations within the ENP framework; recalls the importance of election observation missions and urges the European Parliament and EEAS to send such missions to all countries in the region, at the invitation of the governments of said countries, and to follow up on a regular basis the recommendations made by these missions;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 316 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need to highlight the central role of the Union for the Mediterranean; points out that it should itself be able to raise the necessary funds for these projects; endorses the direction, which ought to be renewed and taken further, being taken by ministerial meetings; calls for wider dissemination of resulting programmes and actions; notes that the fight against terrorism also offers an opportunity for a rapprochement in the agendas of the Union for the Mediterranean and the European Union;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 338 #

2014/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Supports the funding of academic and vocational training to create wide reserves of professional skills in the MENA countries; notes that EU vocational training circular mobility programme should be extended as far as possible to all MENA countries, by means of flexible and evolving tools such as mobility partnerships;
2015/04/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas ongoing negotiations on international trade agreements, including the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and also the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA), clearly touches upon international data flows and, while excluding data processing, including the processing and transfer of personal dataprivacy and data protection entirely, which will be discussed in parallel track within the framework of the US-EU Safe Harbor and the Data Protection Umbrella Agreement;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 18 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the US negotiators have proposed a draft chapter on e-commerce for the TTIP in the 7th round of negotiations; whereas this draft is not available to Members of the European Parliament, including rapporteurs e Parliament reserves the right to express its opinion after consulting the competent committees;draft.
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Whereas the Parliament adopted its resolution of 12 March 2014 on the US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and their impact on EU citizens' fundamental rights and on transatlantic cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs1 a ; __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0230.
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 35 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls its resolution of 12 March 2014 on the US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and their impact on EU citizens’ fundamental rights and on transatlantic cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs1 ; recalls that the consent of the European Parliament to the final TTIP agreement could be endangered as long as the blanket mass surveillance activities are not completely abandoned and an adequate solution is found for the data privacy rights of EU citizens, including administrative and judicial redress; __________________ 1deleted Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0230.
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 44 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas an ambitious and balanced agreement with the US may support the reindustrialisation of Europe and help achieve the 2020 target for an increase of the EU’s GDP generated by industry from 15 % to 20 %; whereas it has the potential to create opportunities especially for SMEs, which suffer more from non-tariff barriers (NTBs) than larger companies; whereas an agreement between the two biggest economic blocs in the world has the potential to create standards, norms and rules which will be adopted at a global level, which would serve to the advantage of third countries as well;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Article XIV of the General Agreement on Trade and Services (GATS) clearly refers to privacy and data protection as an exception which cannot be considered a trade barrier; stresses that EU data protection legislation cannot be deemed an ‘arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination’ in the application of Article XIV of the GATS; stresses that a comprehensive and unambiguous horizontal clause that fully exempts EU rules on the protection of personal data from the agreement should be incorporated, without any condition that it must be consistent with other parts of the TTIP;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 58 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that personal data can be transferred outside the Union only if the provisions on third-country transfers in EU data protection laws are respected; recalls that the Commission can only negotiate on provisions which touch upon the flow of personal data provided that the full application of EU data protection rules is guaranteed; is seriously concerned about the TiSA draft text, which would completely undermine all EU rules and safeguards for the transfer of personal data to third countries;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 64 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that EU rules on the transfer of personal data may prohibit the processing of such data in third countries if they do not meet the EU adequacy standard; insists that any provisions in the agreement which touch upon the localisation of data processing equipment and establishments must not undermine these EU rules on data transfers;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 69 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that decisions on legal conflicts about fundamental rights may only be made by competent ordinary courts; is concerned that provisions on investor- state dispute settlement (ISDS) may prevent access to justice and undermine democracy;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 73 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, given the growing interconnectedness of global markets – up to 40 % of European industrial products are manufactured from imported upstream products – it is crucial that policymakers shape the way these markets interact; whereas proper trade rules are fundamental to creating added value in Europe, since industrial production takes place in global value chains;it is crucial that Europe benefits from participation in global supply chains, while maintaining and developing a strong, competitive and diversified industrial base in Europe; (For consistency with the Recital A European added value should not be built only on e.g. costs of marketing, storage and/or distribution of imports. Also resolution should not quote data without reference to sources. TTIP should first and foremost promote trade of goods manufactured in the EU or the US but the imported goods only repacked/relabelled/assembled in the EU or the US.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers the investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) an important tool for protecting investors; calls on the Commission and the Council to improve the mechanism to avoid potential abuse of ISDS proceedings and to ensure equal access to all investors, fair and transparent procedures and independent and impartial arbitration;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 87 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to increase political pressure on the US in the framework of the negotiations in order to guarantee full visa reciprocity for all Member States of the European Union without discrimination;
2015/01/29
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 185 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas President Juncker has clearly reiterated in his Political Guidelines that – while the EU and the US can go a significant step further in recognising each other’s product standards and working towards transatlantic standards – the EU will not sacrifice its safety, health, social and data protection standards or our cultural diversity, recalling that the high level of safety of the food we eat and the protection of Europeans’ personal data are non- negotiable;will be maintained; (It is important to stress that we are not talking about lowering standards in negotiations rather than saying that issues of food safety are not-negotiable, as it is not true - issues of food safety or SPS are being negotiated, but we don’t want to decrease level of protection in this negotiations. That is the difference.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 350 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) to ensure that mutually beneficial mobility package is provided for, which includes visa facilitation for providers of services and goods from all Member States and recognises their professional and technical qualifications;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2014/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers the European Union and neighbourhood security environment to be increasingly unstable and volatile; regards the war in Ukraine, the conflicts in Syria and Iraq, with the rise of the terrorist organisation ISIS, the Libyan crisis and the terrorist threat in the Sahel as direct threats to the Union’s security; stresses that the EU’s strategy for the Sahel should more clearly set priorities and renew joint actions between Europe, the Mediterranean and the continent of Africa; considers, too, that the US ‘pivot to Asia’ and the impact of the financial crisis on Member States’ budgets and capabilities only highlight how necessary it is for the Union to shoulder more responsibility for its own security and defence;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2014/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the Union and its Member States must, as a matter of the utmost urgency, adapt to the new security challenges, in particular by making effective use of the existing CSDP tools, by coordinating national action more closely and, where appropriate, by introducing in a pragmatic and flexible way new arrangements for the expression of European solidarity; calls for the implementation of a fully-fledged migration diplomacy to give greater consistency to the internal and external policies of the EU;
2015/01/30
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the need to raise the profile of the EU’s external action, not just among EU citizens, but also among those of third countries; stresses that the profile of the EU’s special representatives should be raised by granting them the appropriate means to fulfil their mandates; points out that the visibility of the EU’s actions should be increased at the level of strategic planning and multilateral fora, as well as at operational level through CSDP missions and all other missions with an external facet;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 214 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a reform of the EU’s approach to migration policy; insists on the need to address the root causes of irregular migration, using all policy and assistance instruments, including development and trade policies, humanitarian aid, conflict prevention and crisis management; calls in this context for a serious migration policy to be drawn up which would include cross-cutting migration issues in the EU's external policies; reiterates its call to step up humanitarian support to countries which host refugees and to strengthen Regional Protection Programmes, run in collaboration with UNHCR close to regions of origin; stresses that migration management should be a priority in EU cooperation with neighbours in the east and south;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 391 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Highlights the fact that, in many fields – from security to development and including the strengthening of the rule of law and democracy – the Union’s external policy in respect of its southern neighbourhood must also make the link with Africa; draws attention specifically to the European Strategy for the Sahel, which ought to set out priorities more clearly and to update joint measures involving the EU, the Mediterranean region and the continent of Africa;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, although women account for almost 60% of graduates in the EU, the proportion of EU scientists and engineers who are female is less than 33% while women make up almost 80% of the workforce in the health, education and welfare sectors;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 83 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings will end in 2016, and the vast majority 1 a of victims of trafficking in the Union are women and girls; __________________ 1a 80% of registered victims, according to the 2014 Eurostat report on trafficking in human beings
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 99 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the media can play a role, on the one hand, in spreading stereotypes, degrading the image of women and over- sexualising young girls and, on the other, in overcoming gender stereotypes, encouraging women’s participation in decision making and promoting gender equality;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 143 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement proactive policies to promote good jobs for women in order to meet the Europe 2020 targets by combating stereotypes and vertical and horizontal occupational segregation, encouraging the transition from part- to full-time working, and focusing on the NEET27 category in particular; urges the Member States and the Commission to promote, through information and awareness-raising campaigns in particular, entry by women into sectors traditionally viewed as ʽmaleʼ, notably the sciences and new technologies, with a view to benefiting fully from the human capital represented by European women; stresses particularly that ICT offers new opportunities for greater flexibility in the organisation of work and calls upon the Commission to ensure gender is fully mainstreamed in the priority accorded to the digital agenda in the forthcoming five years; __________________ 27 Not in education, employment or training.
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reiterates that the economic potential of female entrepreneurship for European growth and competitiveness is underestimated and under-exploited; asks the European Commission and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) to collect as quickly as possible more and better information on female entrepreneurship, and in particular access to financing and economic networks; notes that institutions such as chambers of commerce and industry could play a far more significant role in promoting female entrepreneurship through information campaigns, training courses and business support activities, and in combating gender stereotypes in economic circles, including within banks; calls on the Member States to include, as part of secondary education, projects which can encourage entrepreneurship by young people irrespective of gender; notes that female entrepreneurship also constitutes an opportunity to restructure the labour market in a way that benefits the family and gender equality;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 153 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Points to the decisive role education plays in combating gender stereotypes and ending gender-based discrimination; stresses that young boys and men need to be included in promoting womenʼs rights and gender equality;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 175 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points to the need for specific proposals making for better balance in terms of working, family, and personal life by encouraging men and women to share occupational, family, and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare is concerned; notes that more comprehensive day care and nursery facilities depend not only on the necessary public policies, but also on incentives to businesses to offer such solutions; urges (regional) chambers of commerce and industry, in addition, to facilitate networking of entrepreneurs, especially female entrepreneurs, with a view to working out solidarity-based joint approaches to work-life balance; notes that flexibility in working hours and the way work is organised, as well as part- time work, may constitute one solution to a better work-life balance;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 193 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Member States, and their media regulators, to consider the place accorded – in both quantitative and qualitative terms – to women in the media and television in particular, not least in order to avert insults to the dignity of women, avoid conveying gender stereotypes, and curb any tendency to hypersexualise little girls;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 196 #

2014/2217(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine whether gender clauses might be included in public procurement tender notices in order to encourage businesses to strive towards gender equality in their ranks; acknowledges that EU legislation on competition has to be complied with in developing this idea;
2014/12/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 24 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that the promotion of women's rights must be an important part of the Union’s human rights dialogue with third countries; urges the EEAS and the Commission to define, in partnership with each country, a limited number of priority women's rights so as to concentrate efforts and funds in order to better achieve the priority objectives;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that gender stereotypes are among the main reasons for violations of women’s rights and inequalities between men and women; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to emphasise the involvement of men in information and awareness-raising campaigns on women’s rights; notes that particular attention must be paid to constitutional, legislative or regulatory provisions which discriminate against women on the basis of their sex, for example with regard to access to justice, property, credit, health care or education; reiterates that child marriage, early and forced marriage and failure to enforce a legal minimum age of marriage constitute not only a violation of children’s rights but also an obstacle to women’s empowerment;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Stresses the need to do more to secure the right to education and access to education, especially for girls; welcomes the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Malala Yousafzai and Kailash Satyarthi for their struggle for children’s rights; notes that access to education is, in part, a precondition for the full exercise of other human rights, such as freedom of conscience and religion and participation in political life;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates that female genital mutilation is a grave violation of human rights, and a subject to which particular attention must be paid in the EU’s dialogue with countries where the practice is highly prevalent; points out, furthermore, that female genital mutilation has serious, long-lasting effects on women’s health and hence on prospects for development;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Strongly condemns the continued use of sexual violence against women as a weapon of war; stresses that more needs to be done to ensure respect of international law and access to psychological support for women and girls abused in conflicts; welcomes the fact that the Sakharov Prize 2014 was awarded to Dr Denis Mukwege for his commitment in the fight against sexual violence against women and calls on the EU, the Member States, international organisations, civil society to increase cooperation to raise awareness and combat impunity;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses the importance of strengthening women’s role in promoting human rights and democratic reform, in supporting conflict prevention and in consolidating political participation and representation; notes, also, in this regard that the recommendations made in the reports of EU Election Observation Missions concerning women’s full and equal participation in the electoral process, should be taken into account and acted upon;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 53 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses the need to tackle human trafficking, the majority of whose victims are women exploited for sexual purposes; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation with third countries on the exchange of good practices and the dismantling of international trafficking networks, which also make use of the internet to find new victims;
2014/12/15
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 154 #

2014/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the importance of following up on the reports and recommendations of Election Observation Missions by using these as part of a ‘road map for democracy’ in the country concerned and by mandating the Chief Observer to exercise a special role in the follow-up monitoring of the implementation of the recommendations, as a coherent part of Parliament’s comprehensive democracy support approach and with the support of Parliament’s standing bodies (including the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group); notes the positive role that can be played by EU-deployed election observation missions in terms of ensuring the EU’s credibility as a partner and the EU’s responsibility towards European citizens and taxpayers;
2014/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2014/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls that, following the Arab Spring, the European Union redefined its neighbourhood policy towards the South Mediterranean and insisted on the role of civil society and on the principle of ‘more for more’ in order to develop more solid partnerships with its neighbours and to guide their reforms and democratic transitions;
2014/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 432 #

2014/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74
74. Stresses the urgent need to develop stronger policies at Union level to address the pressing issues related to migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in a manner consistent with international human rights law and fundamental human dignity, and calls on the EU to guarantee effective common standards for reception procedures throughout the Union in order to protect the most vulnerable; invites the VP/HR, the Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs and the EEAS to promote a true spirit of cooperation and equitable burden-sharing among Member States in order to tackle the multiple challenges that persist in this regard; draws attention to the importance of stepping up cooperation with the EU’s partner countries, in particular in the Mediterranean region, in an effort to dismantle illegal networks used to traffic migrants and combat people trafficking; recalls the commitment of the Commission to developing adequate legal migration channels, and, to this end, calls for a revision of the Dublin Regulation, which places disproportionate responsibility on Member States for the Union’s external borders and hinders migrants’ ability to seek and obtain asylum;
2014/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 441 #

2014/2216(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 a (new)
74a. Welcomes the addition of the criterion of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms to the list of key criteria to be taken into account prior to the opening of negotiations on visa- exemption agreements with third countries1; calls on the Commission to use this new criterion as a lever to persuade third countries to accept more meaningful dialogue on human rights in the strategically and economically significant context of negotiations on visas; __________________ 1 Regulation No 509/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement.
2014/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the ‘mother-entrepreneur’ figure to be promoted, in order to guarantee the right to maternity and to grant financial assistance to women who intend to devote themselves to both their families and businesses; calls for measures to support family employment and household services for childcare in view of allowing women entrepreneurs to reconcile work and family life;
2015/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas gender equality is a key economic asset to promote fair and inclusive economic growth, whereas reducing occupational inequality is not just a goal in terms of equal treatment, but also in terms of labour market efficiency and fluidity;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 42 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas one in two womenviolence against women, whether physical, sexual or psychological, is a prime obstacle to equality between women and men and remains the most widespread violation of human rights despite measures taken to counter it, 55% of women having experiencesd one or more forms of sexual harassment in the course of her life and a life free of violence and characterised by self- determination33% of women having experienced physical and/or sexual violence since the age of 15, while a life free of violence is a prerequisite for full participation in society;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas women in rural areas suffer more from multiple discrimination and gender stereotypes than women in urban areas and the employment rate of women in rural areas is much lower than that of women in cities; whereas, in addition, a lot of women are never active in the official labour market and, therefore, are neither registered as unemployed nor included in unemployment statistics, which leads to particular financial and legal problems in relation to the right to maternity and sick leave, the acquisition of pension rights and access to social security, as well as problems in the event of divorce;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas positions of power and decision-making are occupied almost exclusively by men, and women are therefore severely limitedwomen's participation in the labour market does not always translate into influence, positions of power and decision-making being mostly occupied by men, which limits women in their ability to wield influence;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas gender stereotypes and traditional structures have a negative impact otraditional gender roles and stereotypes depicting women continue to have a strong influence on the division of tasks between women and men in the home, in thealth and universal access to sexual and reproductive health and the associated rights is a fundamental human right workplace and in society at large; whereas gender stereotypes also tend to perpetuate the status quo of inherited obstacles to achieving gender equality, and to limit women's range of employment choices and personal development and could partly explain sectoral and occupational segregation between women and men;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 92 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the roles of girls and boys are being strengthened by stereotypes in education materials and structures in educational institutions, and their choices are being thereby limited, and these role patterns are being further reinforced especially by media representationsa major role can be played by the media not just in disseminating stereotypes, thereby even portraying a demeaning image of women, and hypersexualising young girls, but also in overcoming gender stereotypes, promoting the participation of women in decision- making and promoting gender equality;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 101 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas the EU has a responsibility and a role as model for gender equality world-wide, gender equality and theequality between women and men, as well as women empowerment of women are essential if then view of attaining international development goals are to be attained and fornd of pursuing a successful EU foreign policy and women all over the world are especially affected by the consequences of climate, environmental and energy policies;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to draw up and adopt a new strategy for gender equality betweencreating equal opportunities for women and men in Europe aimed at eliminating discrimination against all women and men in their diversity (ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, religion, nationality and age);
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 155 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to gaEIGE to continue its work on putting together gender- specific data and scoreboards in all policy areas;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 198 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Points to the importance of systematic training for qualified personnel looking after female victims of physical, sexual, or psychological violence; considers such training to be essential for providers of first- and second-line care, including emergency social services and medical, civil protection, and police services;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 249 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that equal participation by men and women in the labour market could significantly increase the economic potential of the EU, while confirming its fair and inclusive nature; points out that, according to OECD projections, total convergence in participation rates would result in a 12.4% increase in per capita GDP by 2030;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 250 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Calls for the adoption of the necessary measures to promote higher employment rates among women, such as affordable care and childcare, adequate maternity, paternity and parental leave schemes and flexibility in working hours and places of work, which will make it possible to reconcile their private and working lives;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 251 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Points to the need for specific proposals making for better balance in terms of working, family, and personal life by encouraging men and women to share occupational, family, and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare are concerned; notes that more comprehensive day care and nursery facilities depend not only on the necessary public policies, but also on incentives to businesses to offer such solutions;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 272 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take appropriate measures to reduce the gender pension gap, which is a direct consequence of the gender pay gap, and to assess the impact of the pension systems on women, paying special attention to part-time and atypical contracts;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 295 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Notes that in 2012, according to Commission figures, 31.6% of men and 40% of women in the EU aged between 30 and 34 have a higher education qualification; points out that women account for 60% of new graduates but are underrepresented in, for example, the science and research sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States to raise women's awareness of training in the above field and ensure that they have the same chances as men to enter the corresponding professions and make a career in them;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 302 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Encourages Member States to promote measures and actions to assist and advice women who decide to become entrepreneurs, stressing that financial independence is a key way to equality; calls on the Member States to encourage women entrepreneurship, facilitate access to credit, cut red tape and other obstacles to women's start-ups;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 334 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Commission to assist Member States in ensuring equal access to high-quality, geographically appropriate and readily accessible health services, in the area ofcluding to sexual and reproductive health and rights, safe and legal abortion and contraception as well as general health care;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 339 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Draws attention to Members States to focus on the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and prevention methods, as well as on prevention and research in order to improve early detection of diseases as female cancers (breast, cervix, and ovaries cancers) by (gynaecological) regular controls/check- up;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 368 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Points to the decisive role education plays in combating gender stereotypes and ending gender-based discrimination; stresses that boys and men need to be included in promoting women rights and gender equality;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 372 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29b. Stresses that in order to eliminate gender stereotypes and promote equal behaviour models in social and economic life, it is extremely important to inculcate these values from an early age, and to carry out awareness campaigns in workplaces, and the media, highlighting men's role in promoting equality, the equal distribution of family responsibilities and creation of work-life balance;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 373 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 c (new)
29c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to commit themselves more firmly to ending the sexist stereotypes conveyed by the media and draws attention to important measures included in Parliament's report on the elimination of gender stereotypes, which was adopted in 2013;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 374 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 d (new)
29d. Calls on the Member States, and especially media regulators, to consider the place accorded – in both quantitative and qualitative terms – to women and to promote a balanced, non-stereotyped image of women, and in a way that is respectful of women's dignity, their diverse roles and their identity and placing greater emphasis on her social development, constitutional rights and her role in civil society, the institutions and the working world in the media, and in advertising and promotional materials and television in particular, not least in order to avoid conveying gender stereotypes, and curb any tendency to hyper-sexualise little girls;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 407 #

2014/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Underscores that universal access to sexual and reproductive health and the associated rights is a fundamental human right, and cCalls on the Commission to ensure that European development cooperation adopts an approach based on a human rights and women's empowerment; emphasises the importance of family planning services, information and education to reduce maternal and infant mortality and eliminate female genital mutilation, child- bride and forced marriages, selective, gender-based abortion and forced sterilisation;
2015/03/10
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 42 #

2014/2143(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for ambitious gender-specific targets to be set as regards ending the feminisation of poverty and closing gender gaps, including enhanced access for women and girls to quality education, including secondary education, universal access to quality health care, the enhancement of access for women to sexual and reproductive health and rights, the boosting of women’s social and economic independence, particularly in terms of employment and their participation in decision- making processes, and the ending of all forms of violence against women and girls;
2014/10/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 44 #

2014/2143(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that women’s participation in political decision-making, especially in peace processes is decisive to create the favourable conditions for stabilisation and strengthening of States, and thus for development;
2014/10/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2014/2086(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the financial regulations as currently applied to the EU delegations continue to impose a heavy administrative burden on the Head of Delegation; urges the EEAS and the Commission to find a solution to this issue, which could entail a change to the financial regulations; supports the ECA report recommendation regarding the need to increase support for public procurement procedures in EU delegations;
2015/01/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is deeply concerned about the allegations of corruption against EULEX Kosovo and the way these allegations were dealt with; takes note of the investigation launched to examine EULEX; expects to be informed about its results as soon as possible and stresses the need to apply the lessons learned and avoid any recurrenceat there must be a zero tolerance policy on issues of corruption and that lessons learnt will have to be applied.
2015/01/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2014/0408(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. For that purpose children shall be individually assessed. The assessment shall take particular account of the personality and maturity of the child and their economic and social background. Particular attention shall be given to the most vulnerable children, including victims of human trafficking.
2015/01/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 148 #

2014/0408(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10a Provisional detention Member States shall ensure that children placed in provisional detention are kept separately from adults and convicted children.
2015/01/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 13 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 a (new)
- having regard to European Directives since 1975 on the different aspects of equal treatment for men and women (Directive 2010/41/EU, Directive 2010/18/EU, Directive 2006/54/EU, Directive 2004/113/EC, Directive 92/85/EEC, Directive 86/613/EEC and Directive 79/7/EEC),
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
-Aa. whereas equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the European Union, recognised in the Treaty on European Union and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the European directives on equal treatment for men and women adopted since 1975 have made a considerable contribution towards effectively promoting gender equality;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas equality between women and men has a positive impact on productivity and economic growth, and greater female participation in the labour market has a host of social and economic benefits;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas poverty has increased in the EU since 2007 and household income has dropped, with 24.2 % of the EU’s population now at risk of poverty or exclusion; whereas children, who are often looked after by women, are particularly affected and there has also been an increase in unemployment, the number of unemployed households and in poverty among the unemployed;deleted
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas it is regrettable that some of the old Member States either do not yet apply these Directives correctly, or do not exercise sufficient control over the implementing legislation introduced;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 40 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EU is currently facing the most significant economic and financial crisis since the Great Depression in the 1930s; whereas this crisis has been exacerbated by so-called austerity measures imposed on the Member States by the EU institutions within the framework of economic governance policies (Stability and Growth Pact, European Semester, Euro-Plus Pact, Budgetary Treaty) and ‘financial aid’ programmes;deleted
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the Commission should do more to ensure implementation of EU directives in the field, notably by the social partners who negotiate collective agreements and are too often unaware of Community requirements regarding the equal treatment of women and men with respect to pay, access to employment and career advancement and social security;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the policies applied in the name of the crisis haves a particularly harsh impact on vulnerable people and particularly women, who feel the impact both directly – through loss of employment, wage, pension and benefit cuts, and loss of job security – and indirectly through budget cuts in public services and social care;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas several factors have led to a reduction in women’s incomes, with wage inequality standing at 16.2 % in the EU in 2011, and over 20 % in Estonia, the Czech Republic, Austria, Germany and Greece;deleted
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 111 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas an important role can be played by the media not just in disseminating stereotypes, degrading the image of women, and hypersexualising young girls, but also in overcoming gender stereotypes, promoting the participation of women in decision- making and promoting gender equality;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 127 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that flexible working hours should be the worker’s decision, and should not be imposed or enforced by the employer; rejects situations of flexibility and contractual uncertainty that do not provide for family formation and stability;deleted
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 135 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to pay more attention to ensuring that European directives on the equal treatment of women and men are properly applied by all Member States;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 136 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that whilst there has been a trend towards a reduction in gender inequalities on the labour market following the crisis in terms of the gaps in employment and unemployment rates, this reduction is not the result of Europe suddenly making progress towards greater parity, but rather the consequence of a rapid fall in male employment which has been more affected by the crisis; calls on the Member States to maintain their efforts to achieve better representation of women in decision-making processes, to improve the work-life balance, and to continue to combat violence against women;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 142 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to strengthen and ensure the full use of collective bargaining in the private and public sectors as an irreplaceable instrument with which to regulate labour relations, combat wage discrimination and promote equalityExpects the Commission to take all the measures at its disposal to enforce all aspects of EU directives on equal treatment for men and women, including by the social partners who negotiate collective agreements;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 149 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that equal participation by men and women in the labour market could significantly increase the economic potential of the EU, while confirming its fair and inclusive nature; points out that, according to OECD projections, total convergence in participation rates would result in a 12.4% increase in per capita GDP by 2030;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 151 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Points out that, in December 2012, the Commission recognised that youth policies (the Youth Employment Package and the Youth Guarantee) need to be pursued according to a gender mainstreaming approach; urges the Commission to give greater encouragement to Member States to adopt measures ensuring that the education and vocational training prospects for girls are the same as those for boys;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 153 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to respect the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work of equal value’ and to strengthen public mechanisms for labour inspection and the adoption of methodologiNotes that, for all the progress made in reducing gender pay gaps, wage inequalities are still substantial, not to say increasing, in some Member States; urges the Commission and the Member States to meaensure the value of work in the production chain and to identify, for example, the creation within companies of semi-skillat the fundamental principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ is observed for unskilled wage categories mainly made up of womenwomen and men alike;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Member States and the Commission, using information and awareness campaigns, for example, to encourage women to participate in fields of activity that stereotypes term ‘masculine’, not least sciences and new technologies, the object being to make the most of the human capital to be found in European women and hence enable the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy and gender equality to be achieved to more fruitful effect;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 201 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly uUrges the Member States to increase theigether to seek, and to exchange, best practice with a view to opening up new sources of finance for investment in public services, particularly health servicystems, taking into account the difficulties relatinged to sexual and reproductive healththe crisis and the demographic challenges posed by population ageing while avoiding any lowering of the high standards and the requirements laid down in the relevant European models;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 207 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the average gap between men’s and women’s pensions is 39%, whereas the gender pay gap is estimated to stand at 16%; notes that the amounts of pension that women receive are, in general, affected by a number of factors including the types of precarious employment that they are forced to accept and career breaks;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 215 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to increase their child support budgets in order to expand the public network ofPoints to the need for specific proposals making for better balance in terms of working, family, and personal life by encouraging men and women to share occupational, family, and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare are concerned; notes that more comprehensive day care, and nurseries and public services providing extracurricular activities for childreny facilities depend not only on the necessary public policies, but also on incentives to businesses to offer such solutions; urges (regional) chambers of commerce and industry, in addition, to facilitate networking of entrepreneurs, especially female entrepreneurs, with a view to working out solidarity-based joint approaches to work-life balance;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 237 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that in order to promote the participation of women in decision- making, measures need to be set in motion to combat stereotypes and prejudices about the role of women, along with specific policies to support equal rights and opportunities in economic, social, political and cultural life (to combat irregular and unforeseeable working hours, applying fair remuneration and equal pay and expand public childcare, nursery and school networks,) with the positive effect ofand strengthening women’s participation in all levels ofeconomic, social, and political life;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 245 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States, and especially media regulators, to consider the place accorded – in both quantitative and qualitative terms – to women in the media and television in particular, not least in order to avert insults to the dignity of women, avoid conveying gender stereotypes, and curb any tendency to hypersexualise little girls;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 251 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Points to the need to redouble efforts at European level to increase the representation of women in political spheres and in the European institutions, including the European Parliament; believes that women’s participation needs to be encouraged at national, regional, and municipal levels; points out that political parties have a key role to play;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 271 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that increasing poverty and marginalthe feminisation, owing to so-called austf poverity policies, havemight lead to an increase in female trafficking, sexual exploitation and forced prostitution and that there are signs that domestic violence is on the rise, as social tensions within families also increase, and that women now find themselves more economically dependent on their aggressorsreduce women to greater financial dependence, including those who have suffered domestic violence;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 293 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes with concern that – according to data from the Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action in the EU Member States: Violence against Women, Victim support (2012), from the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) – professional training and the sustainability of funding for public services, associations and NGOs providing services to women in situations of domestic violence are clearly being affected by the so-called austerity measures, threatening the continued existence of such services, and that this is a shameful step backwards in civilizational terms; recalls that tremendous inequality exists among the Member States in terms of access to support services, with secure and sufficient state funding existing in Denmark, the Netherlands and Austriaconsequences of the economic crisis;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 302 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recommends that the Member States strengthen their free public health servicePoints out that violence against women is a major hindrance to gender equality; calls ion the area of support to women subjected to violence and that they increase the number of refuges and their capacity, with specialised assistance to women of different nationalities, in a range of languagesCommission to propose a comprehensive directive on the prevention and eradication of violence against women in all its forms, whether physical, sexual, or psychological; recommends that Member States provide better training to police, court, and social service personnel and improve cooperation among them to enable them to help women who have suffered violence;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2013/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that the European Union has established a Special Representative for Human Rights and that this function should enable the EU to coordinate its action and to make it more comprehensible and visible, in order to promote human rights in the world, in particular women's rights.
2013/10/03
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2013/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Encourages the commitments made by Saudi Arabia in favour of women (the right to vote and stand as candidates in the municipal elections of 2015; nomination of women to the Shura Council; the introduction of a law to protect women, children and domestic workers from abuse; the granting of licenses allowing women to practice law); encourages the Saudi authorities to ensure that measures taken in support of women's rights are implemented in both urban and rural areas; asks the EU to pursue a dialogue with Saudi Arabia in support of further reforms for better gender equality and welfare for women;
2013/10/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2013/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the information campaign launched by the national authorities, in collaboration with civil society organisations, to raise awareness among women about their rights and the measures put in place to protect them; draws attention to the need to target such awareness-raising campaigns at men, too, so that they too are aware of women's rights and of the overall repercussions on society if those rights are not respected; stresses the fact that this information should also reach rural areas and areas that are isolated from the rest of the country;
2013/10/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2013/2146(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. States that assistance measures must take into account the specific features of crises and emergencies, and of countries in which fundamental freedoms are seriously lacking or in which NGOs operate under difficult conditions; encourages the EEAS to determine, in partnership with the populations concerned, a limited number of priorities to be addressed first and foremost and simultaneously, so that funds and resources can be focused on achieving the objectives more effectively; stresses that particular attention should be paid to situations in which women are exposed to physical or psychological violence;
2013/09/24
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2013/2146(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the importance of strengthening women’s role in promoting human rights and democratic reform, in supporting conflict prevention and in consolidating political participation and representation. ; notes also in this regard that the recommendations made in the reports of EU Election Observation Missions concerning women's participation in the electoral process, should be taken into account;
2013/09/24
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2013/2146(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Points out that the credibility of EU external action depends also on compliance with the principle of consistency between internal policies and development goals.
2013/09/24
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2013/2145(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Draws attention to the need for the resources provided to be married as closely as possible with the commitments made, in order to achieve the objectives of increasing the competitiveness and sustainability of European agriculture.
2013/09/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation (new)
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010- 2015’ (COM(2010)0491);
2013/09/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 2 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A (new)
A. whereas new technology affords both employers and employees new opportunities for organising work in such a way as to strike a better work-life balance and thus make the labour market more inclusive for women;
2013/09/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) to improve childcare facilities, remove disincentives for second earners, harmonise the statutory retirement age for men and women, accommodate needs to combine work and private life, in particular by improving access to new technologies and to training in the use of those technologies, and eliminate gender and pension gaps; expresses its concern about the fact that many of these recommendations were already laid down in 2012, indicating a lack of implementation in Member States;
2013/09/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2013/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas undocumented women migrants are more likely to suffer violence and abuse, including sexual abuse; whereas undocumented women migrants are liable to fall prey to sexual exploitation and to trafficking in human beings in general; whereas access to state-run women’s shelters is subject to the requirement for a legal form of ID or a residence permit and whereas victims consequently have no choice but to remain in an abusive situation or flee to the streets; whereas they risk deportation if they contact the police;
2013/11/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2013/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that immigration policy and the management of migratory flows, be they legal or illegal, are the common and joint responsibility of the EU Member States;
2013/11/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2013/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to establish suitable training courses, for their police forces and other state services that may be asked to deal with undocumented migrant women, on the gender violence and sexual exploitation to which these women can fall victim;
2013/11/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the pressures under which prostitution takes place can be direct and physical, or indirect, for example by means of pressure on the family in the country of origin, and whereas such pressures can be psychological and insidious;
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 83 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that prostitution and exploitation in the sex industry can have devastating, long-term consequences, for the individuals involved, even after they have left prostitution, in addition to being both a cause and a consequence of gender inequality and perpetuating gendered stereotypes such as the idea that women’s and girls’ bodies are for sale to satisfy male demand for sex;
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 107 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that 9 out of 10 prostitutes would like to stop but feel unable to do so27; believes, in this regard, that appropriate support, particularly psychological and social assistance, is needed to escape sexual exploitation networks and the frequently related dependency; __________________ 27 89 % of 785 people in prostitution from 9 countries wanted to escape prostitution, Farley et al, 2003.
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 134 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that gender-specific prevention strategies and awareness-raising measures are key to combating the sexual exploitation of women and girls; draws attention to the growing role of the internet and social networks in recruiting new and young prostitutes through human trafficking networks; calls for prevention campaigns also to be conducted on the internet, taking into account the vulnerable groups targeted by these human trafficking networks;
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 166 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the importance of appropriate training for police services and judicial system personnel in a more general manner in the various aspects of sexual exploitation, including the gender and immigration aspects; stresses the need for judicial cooperation between Member States in order to combat human trafficking networks in Europe more effectively;
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 173 #

2013/2103(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Urges the Member States to provide social services for victims of trafficking or sexual exploitation and to implement policies aimed at helping vulnerable women and girls to leave prostitution; stresses the importance of psychological counselling and the need for victims of sexual exploitation to be reintegrated into society; points out that this process takes time and requires a life plan to be developed for former prostitutes which represents a credible and viable alternative;
2013/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2013/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3а. Welcomes the extension of the School Fruit Scheme under the new CAP and the increase in its annual budget;
2013/11/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #

2013/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4а. Welcomes the scope for providing more coupled support under the new CAP, which will contribute to production stability in sensitive sectors such as fruit and vegetable growing;
2013/11/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H (new)
3a. whereas there is a need to create and apply an effective marketing tool to help boost the competiveness of regional products, encourage local producers and contribute to the development of a regional identity not just as regards agriculture but also in other areas;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2а. Emphasises that agricultural regions play a multifunctional role involving not only agricultural development but also other economic and social activities revolving around local capacity building of skills, know-how and investment in the pinpointing and harnessing of all local assets, valuable and latent potentials and resources;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 39 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Е a (new)
Еа. whereas stockbreeding in these regions is not just an economic activity and a means of livelihood for their inhabitants, but also a key component of their traditional cultures and social structures closely linked with the life and traditions of the local populations;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 40 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Е b (new)
Еb. whereas a large proportion of the natural meadows and pastures that provide essential grazing for livestock in mountain and foothill areas are seriously overgrown with invasive weeds and bushes, some of which are harmful types of plant;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 83 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5а. Believes that specific measures are also needed to resolve the problem of invasive types of plant, which should help increase the yields from areas experiencing this problem, and hence lead to an increase in milk, meat, wool and hide production there;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 55 #

2013/2096(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital К c (new)
Кc. whereas some small agricultural producers, such as beekeepers, do not possess and/or do not use land and are thus excluded from the small agricultural producer system;
2013/11/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 91 #

2013/2096(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Emphasises that, given the voluntary character of the small agricultural producer system within the first pillar of the CAP, it is essential that all possible opportunities for supporting small producers within the second pillar be reviewed and utilised;
2013/11/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 93 #

2013/2096(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5f. Considers it essential, apart from such measures, to find an effective means of supporting those small agricultural producers whose activity and output do not entail the ownership and/or use of agricultural land;
2013/11/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 14 #

2013/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2а. Emphasises that, given the nature of the EU single market, food fraud extends in many cases beyond the Member States’ borders and becomes a threat to the health of all European citizens;
2013/11/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2013/2091(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3а. Points out that direct, enhanced cooperation between the Member States’ competent bodies when food fraud is suspected or confirmed is of vital importance for the tracing and investigation of the fraud;
2013/11/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph D a (new)
Da. whereas the scope of democratic reconstruction is broadened when more women are involved in conflict resolution processes and political decision-making,
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph D b (new)
Db. whereas 80 % of the adult population, many of them women, are illiterate,
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 5 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph D c (new)
Dc. whereas women are key to reducing food and nutritional insecurity and can help boost agricultural productivity;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 13 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need to eliminate all forms of violence against women, for example physical violence or forced marriages, by means of awareness-raising campaigns aimed at informing women about their rights and educating men about the need to respect them;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises the key role to be played by women in building a stable State and in national reconciliation; calls on the international community to continue supporting the participation of women at all levels of public life;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the international community, in particular the EU and its Member States in the context of their external action, and in cooperation with local partners and NGOs, to emphasise the importance of access for girls to primary education and efforts to tackle adult illiteracy, which is depriving South Sudan of precious human capital which it needs for its development and to strengthen it as a democratic State;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Draws attention to the contribution that women could make to the development of agriculture and the rural economy; encourages South Sudan to take measures to promote women’s involvement in these economic activities;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Calls on the international community, in cooperation with NGOs, to foster the development of associations which bring women together and which support them in achieving economic autonomy;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Calls for projects funded by the EU to be monitored and assessed regularly, including as regards progress towards gender equality, and for Parliament to be informed of the results;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 21 #

2013/2090(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Calls for the views of local communities, in particular women, to be taken into account so that clearer objectives can be set for the projects and those objectives can be tailored to the situation on the ground and developments;
2013/09/06
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the role played by self-help associations in bringing together people, and particularly women, who have to take care of disabled members of their family or close circle of friends, and the awareness-raising work carried out by these associations;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 86 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Insists that inclusion presupposes that stereotypes are countered withby conveying positive images andthrough the use of cultural expressions and through information and awareness-raising campaigns, in particular depictions of disabilities in the public sphere, since it is exactly this area that is trailing behind;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 128 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Points out the importance of eradicating prejudice and encouraging social acceptance, respect and tolerance; encourages Member States in particular to run awareness-raising campaigns;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2013/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that cloud services agreements must set out the duties and rights of the parties concerning data processing activities by cloud providers in a clear and transparent manner, on a basis of respect for EU data protection law;
2013/06/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 45 #

2013/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – indent 1
– guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU's fundamental rights and data, data protection obligations and intellectual property right protection obligations;
2013/06/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Gа. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice acting in its judicial role’;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 3 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas Parliament approved the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, drafted by the Ombudsman, in its resolution of 6 September 2001;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 7 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Jа. whereas the majority of complaints (56%) are received in electronic format for registration via the European Ombudsman’s interactive website, which is available in all 23 official languages;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital О
О. whereas the main types of alleged maladministration investigated in 2012 concerned lawfulness (27.7 %), requests for information (12.5%), fairness (10.3 %), time limits for decisions (8 %) and requests for access to documents (6.7 %);
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6а. Calls for the requisite steps to be taken to accelerate the procedures for investigating complaints, conducting enquiries and taking decisions;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 26 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9а. Notes with satisfaction the ten ‘star cases’ presented by the Ombudsman, which provide model examples for administrative practice in the various EU institutions in a variety of fields;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 37 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Reiterates its call on the Commission to adopt common binding rules and principles on administrative procedure in the EU’s administration and to present a draft regulation to this end on the basis of Article 298 of the TFEU, as it considers this would be the best way to ensure lasting change in the administrative culture of the EU institutions;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 48 #

2013/2051(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22а. Emphasises that International Right to Know Day on 28 September is an initiative which raises the profile of the Ombudsman among the European public and is an example of good practice;
2013/06/25
Committee: PETI
Amendment 52 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas maternal mortality remains a concern in some Member States and a challenge for European development policy;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas studies have shown that comprehensive sexuality education does increase the likelihood of responsible, safe and respectful behaviour upon first and subsequent sexual activity;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas young people are widely exposed, from an early age, to pornographic content, especially through access to the Internet whether at home or at school;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 64 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the sexualisation of little girls in the media is a phenomenon that affects the emotional development and the sex life of both women and men and helps to perpetuate gender stereotyping and various forms of discrimination and sexual violence;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 68 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the sharing of best practices among Member States offers a means of identifying optimal solutions and more effectively safeguarding the interests of all EU citizens;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the Member States to share their best practices and packages of measures in the field of sexual and reproductive health policy;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 122 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Member States to promote scientific research on male- and female- controlled methods of contraception, so as to facilitate the burden-sharing of contraceptive responsibility;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 155 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines that the sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents differ from those of adults; calls on the Member States to ensure that adolescents and vulnerable adults (disabled, illiterate, refugees, etc.) have access to user-friendly services where their concerns and rights to confidentiality and privacy are duly taken into account;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 159 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on Member States to ensure compulsory, age-appropriate and gender- sensitive sexuality and relationship education, provided in a mixed-sex setting, for all children and adolescents (both in and out of school);
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 170 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Emphasises in this regard that sexuality education is particularly necessary as young people have access, from an early age, to pornographic and degrading content, especially via the Internet; emphasises therefore that sexuality education must be part of a broader supportive approach to young people’s emotional development so as to enable them to form mutually respectful relationships with members of the opposite sex; encourages Member States to introduce campaigns directed at parents and at adults who work with young people, to raise their awareness about the harmful effects of pornography on adolescents;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 171 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Asks the Member States, too, to address the fundamental need for comprehensive sexuality education that includes the emotional aspects of relationships, given the phenomenon of sexualisation of little girls in audiovisual and digital content to which young people have access;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 172 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Asks Member States, in the context of sexuality education, to focus on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, by encouraging safe sexual behaviour and facilitating access to means of protection;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 175 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new)
Encourages Member States to strengthen policies for raising awareness about sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among all age groups;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 202 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Highlights the fact that the epidemics suffered in certain developing countries which are partners of the EU, including the HIV epidemic, significantly impede development;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 3 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the Treaty of Lisbon brought important positive elements to the area of freedom, security and justice but deplornotes certain shortcomings in its implementation; is no longer willing to accept that the Council and the Commission, in many instances, continue to act as if the Treaty of Lisbon had not entered into forcepoints out that the Treaty of Lisbon signifies increased powers for Parliament; requests the fulfilment of the obligation to inform the Parliament ‘immediately and fully at all stages of the procedure’ leading to the conclusion of international agreements; regrets the unacceptable delays in bringing the acts of the former third pillar in line with the Treaty of Lisbon; calls for a case-by-case assessment of the former third pillar acts with regard to how theyir impact on fundamental rights, with a view to bringing them in line with the new hierarchy of norms of basic, delegated and implementing acts;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 26 #

2013/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Commission and Member states to ensure that a gender-sensitive approach is included in all legal training provided by the European Judicial Training Network, the Academy of European Law and any other relevant institutions to the various stakeholders in the field of judicial and police cooperation; calls for the introduction of specific modules concerning gender-based violence and proper procedures to assist victims;
2013/07/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Is of the view that, in general terms, the implementation of the Stockholm Programme does not live up to its ambition to promote citizens’ rightStockholm Programme was very ambitious, that it has not yet been fully implemented and that its implementation needs to be stepped up in order to promote justice, security and civil liberties;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 54 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls urgently for measures to address the so-calledfor thought to be given, at all levels, to making a better response to the Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States; announces its intention to set up a Copenhagen Commission within the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 72 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Fears that the economic crisis may develop into a crisis of democracy and believes that strong political leadership is necessary to defend democratic achievementsTakes the view that, at a time of economic crisis, it is necessary to be particularly vigilant so as to safeguard democracy and prevent intolerance;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 89 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Regrets the inadequacy of policies on integrating people with disabilities and of how their rights are taken into account;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 111 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that mutual recognition requires that citizens and legal professionals trust each other’s legal institutions; notes that the strengthening of a truly European legal culture that is fully respectful of the principles of subsidiary and of judicial independence, the establishment of common standards and an understanding of other legal systems, in particular through training, plays a very important role in underpinning mutual recognition and trust; points out that mutual recognition and trust can lead to gradual changes in national civil law traditions through an exchange of best practices between Member States;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 126 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, but regrets that key proposals on legal aid and vulnerable suspects are outstanding and that the level of ambition of the Council seems to be decreasing more and morenothing has been done as regards protecting witnesses and whistleblowers;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 160 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the Member States and the Commission in the context of the Internal Security Strategy (ISS) and the EU policy cycle on organised and serious international crime; points out, however, that further progress needs to be made, for instance in the fields of combating transnational organised crime, cybercrime, protection of critical infrastructure and the fights against corruption, money laundering, terrorist funding and the trade in illegal firearms;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 171 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Recalls that Parliament is now a fully- fledged institutional actor in the field of security policies, and is therefore entitled to participate actively in determining the features and priorities of the ISS and in evaluating those instruments, including through regular monitoring exercises on by monitoring the implementation of the ISS, to be conducted jointly by the European Parliament, national parliaments and the Council under Articles 70 and 71 TFEU;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 175 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Believes that a proper analysis of the security threats to be addressed is an essential prerequisite for an effective ISS; notes the usefulness of Europol's analyses in this connection;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 177 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Points out that the current ISS will come to an end in 2014; calls on the Commission to start preparing a new ISS for the period 2015-2019 which takes account of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into Union law; calls on the Council to take Parliament’s input, and Europol's risk analyses, for the new ISS properly into account before adopting the new strategy;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 183 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Acknowledges that cross-border crime is on the increase in the EU and therefore underlines the importance of European law enforcement information exchange; believes that the current ‘landscape’ of the different instruments, channels and tools is complicated and scattered, leading to inefficient use of the instruments available and to inadequate democratic oversight at EU level; calls for a future-oriented vision on how to shape and optimise law enforcement data sharing in the EU while guaranteeing a robust level of data protection; notes the need to boost law enforcement authorities' confidence in each other so as to step up information exchanges;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 188 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Congratulates the Commission on its proposal on the confiscation of criminal assets, and trusts that this reform measure will be adopted promptly; points out that confiscating criminal assets is one of the most effective ways of combatting criminal organisations;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 194 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal forchange of legal basis and positive developments proposed by the Commission for Europol, with a view to the new Europol Regulation, and hopes for a quick advancement of this important legislative dossier so that Europol can be brought into line with the Lisbon Treaty as soon as possible;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 198 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Finds the lack of progress on combatting terrorism most regrettable; notes in particular that much remains to be done on preventing terrorism and on tracking and preventing terrorist financing; calls for policies to be developed to prevent the radicalisation of young people, in particular, and to detect its early signs;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 199 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 b (new)
36b. Notes that trafficking in the EU, both of drugs and of people, is continuing to expand and that the relevant European policies need to be strengthened;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 200 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 c (new)
36c. Regrets that the EU does not yet have the proper resources to prevent natural or man-made disasters and respond to them;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 201 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 d (new)
36d. Calls for the resources allocated for joint investigation teams to be expanded without excessive red tape;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 202 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 e (new)
36e. Calls for policies to protect children against all forms of violence, including in the digital environment, to be strengthened;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 209 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Considers the absence of controls at internal borders as one of the major achievements of European integration; requests the Commission to pay particular attention to the absence of controls at internal borders, and firmly rejects all unjustified attempts to limit the freedom of movement of persons;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 216 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Acknowledges that the Schengen area is a kind of laboratory that so far has been developed step by step; is nevertheless of the opinion that a long-term reflection about its further development is necessary, with a view to strengthening external border controls; believes that the Schengen external borders should in the future be guarded by European border guards;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 227 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Welcomes the successful migration to the Schengen Information System II, the continued roll-out of the Visa Information System and the setting-up of the agency eu-LISA for their operational management; underlines that these new systems now need to stand the test of everyday use; recalls its request that ‘new border management instruments or large-scale data storage systems should not be launched until the existing tools are fully operational, safe and reliable’; is looking forward to the evaluations of the systems foreseen in the respective legal instruments;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 230 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Calls for the security of source documents to be enhanced in order to improve the reliability of identity documents in the European Union;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 231 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41b. Stresses the importance of using all means at our disposal, including the available new technologies, to strengthen external border controls;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 232 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 c (new)
41c. Highlights the importance of tackling trafficking and smuggling at borders, including combatting the trafficking of migrants;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 273 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46a. External dimension of freedom, security and justice
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 275 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 b (new)
46b. Notes the importance of a strengthened external dimension for European policies in the area of freedom, security and justice;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 276 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 c (new)
46c. Calls for cooperation with third countries to be strengthened at all levels in the areas of security, migration, fundamental rights and border management;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 277 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 d (new)
46d. Notes the need to examine and address the role of transit countries;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 278 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 e (new)
46e. Stresses the need to encourage voluntary return policies;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 279 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 f (new)
46f. Points out that the European Union and the Member States should continue to integrate immigration into development cooperation and strengthen their partnership agreements with a view to promoting cooperation with third countries of origin and transit on tackling people trafficking and irregular immigration, the restoration of family ties, return and readmission, in the context of the regular dialogue which the European Union conducts with these countries and the action carried out by the European External Action Service (EEAS);
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 280 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Profoundly deplores the low quality of the policy-making process; observes that the definition of problems, the discussion of possible solutions and the choice between possible options usually does not follow a sequential order, as would be correct, but is rather often done simultaneously; calls on the Commission first to present reports on the issues to be addressed, then to invite a discussion on possible solutions and finally to present legislative proposals;deleted
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 284 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. DeploRegrets the absence of an objective evaluation of the progress towards an area of freedom, security and justice and of reliable information on the Member States’ implementation of theat there is not more information available on the Member States’ implementation of European legislation to make it easier for legislators and citizens to monitor the application and development of the European acquis;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 285 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
49. Proposes a systematic and independent ex-post evaluation of new legislation that should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area;deleted
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 291 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 a (new)
49a. Regrets that impact assessments have not always been adequate and have not always made it possible to assess objectively the costs of new measures; stresses the importance of avoiding any excessive bureaucracy;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 303 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Requests the Commission to put more emphasis on overseeing and ensuring the concrete implementation of EU legislation by the Member States; notes that, when the rights of citizens are concerned, this needs to be done as of the first day an act enters into force; considers that more needs to be done in this area, and that the reasons for any failure to implement EU legislation should be identified;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 306 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Is of the opinion that improving the quality of EU legislation in the area of freedom, security and justice requires a joint effort by the Member States and the European institutions in order to improve the exchange of information on each national system and to provide accurate legal information (on national/regional applicable legislation and standards) as well as information on implementation and practises; calls for better interinstitutional coordination;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 307 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
53. DeploRegrets that the Council’s frequent recourse to does not involve Parliament more in the drawing up of strategy documents, such as the drugs strategy and the internal security strategy, which are adopted without any involvement of Parliament;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 310 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
54. Considers that the development of a European judicial and police culture is a key prerequisite for making the area of freedom, security and justice a reality for citizens; calls, with this in mind, for much greater emphasis on, and funding for, EU judicial training for all legal professionals and police forces; notes the importance of using a ‘bottom-up approach’ for judicial training schemes, of ensuring the greater accessibility of European law information resources via web technology (i.e. an e- justice portal), of improving knowledge of European law among the judiciary as well as of the linguistic skills of judicial practitioners, and of establishing and maintaining networks in this field; notes that the training of police forces with a European perspective is equally importantnd language skills among the judiciary and police forces, and of establishing and maintaining networks in this field and any other measures to facilitate their cooperation on a day-to- day basis;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 312 #

2013/2024(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
56. Demands that any future programming be prepared in the spirit of the Treaty of Lisbon in a joint exercise of Parliament, the Council and the Commission; believes it is necessary to focus on the implementation and consolidation of existing instruments and that a future programme should therefore be short and balanced; takes note of the European Council conclusions of 27/28 June this year according to which the European Council ‘will hold a discussion at its June 2014 meeting to define strategic guidelines for legislative and operational planning in the area of freedom, security and justice (pursuant to Article 68 TFEU)’, considers the envisaged timing as inappropriate;
2013/09/10
Committee: JURILIBEAFCO
Amendment 131 #

2013/2013(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 а (new)
27а. Notes that the Committee on Petitions receives information and suggestions from citizens on possible ways of improving the European Citizens’ Initiative procedure, and believes that consideration should be given to these;
2013/07/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 133 #

2013/2013(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Stresses the need for regular review of the state of play with the European Citizens’ Initiatives, with the aim of improving the procedure and enabling effective solutions to be found as swiftly as possible to any obstacles at every stage of the procedure;
2013/07/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need to provide better universal social security and to promote social insurancefor a social security system that covers pensions, illness and occupational accidents for all self- employed; calls on the Commission and Member States to link social security and social protection rights to the individual rather than the working contract, thereby enabling decent social protection for all including and their spouses or partners recognised by national law who participate in the activities of the self- employed and workers regardless of their contract type or employment status;
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that in particular self-employed women face obstacles in terms of individual access to and take-up of social security rights and that those obstacles have a long-term negative effect on the acquisition of social security rights; calls on Member States to reduce administrative obstacles in accessing social security among self-employedunder Directive 2010/41/EU on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity, the Member States must tackle all obstacles that prevent women and their spouses or partners recognised by national law from benefiting from social protection in accordance with national law;
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 24 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on Member States to promote and support group insurance for occupational accidents and illness; calls on Member States to ensure access to collective and solidarity based insurance and pension schemes for self-employed;deleted
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on Member States to ensure the availability of affordable childcare facilities and to ensure equal access for self-employed to relevant tax or social advantages in relation to child care;deleted
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 33 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to propose an ambitious revision of Directive 2010/41/EU1 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity in order to guarantee higher, minimum maternity and paternity leave rights; __________________ 1 OJ L 180, 15.7.2010, p. 1.deleted
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2013/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on Member States to also facilitate the combination of work and care responsibilities by providing workers with flexibility with regard to working hours and working place in order to avoid that they have no other possibility for flexibility than to resort to dependent self- employmentfor the self-employed and their spouses or partners recognised by national law by speeding up the application of Articles 7 and 8 of Directive 2010/41/EU of 7 July 2010;
2013/10/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 123 #

2013/2004(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas greater independence and social and economic involvement makes women less vulnerable and reduces gender-based violence;
2013/12/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 127 #

2013/2004(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Asks the Council to activate the passerelle clause, by adopting a unanimous decision identifying gender based violence (including FGM) as an area of crime listed in Article 83(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; draws the Council’s attention to the need to ensure that the victim protection laws and regulations already in place are fully implemented;
2013/12/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 128 #

2013/2004(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Requests the Commission to present an EU-wide Strategy and an Action Plan to combat violence against women, focusing in particular on making women aware of their rights and men and boys (from an early age) of the need to respect women’s physical and psychological integrity, in order to help prevent such violence, stressing the need for police and judicial services to be given proper training in dealing with the specific challenges of gender-based violence, and encouraging Member States to make arrangements to help victims rebuild their lives and recover their self-confidence, so as to guard against future vulnerability or dependence;
2013/12/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2013/0238(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) With a view to achieving the MDG and drawing up the post-2015 development framework, the European Year of Development should highlight – and put into practice – the vital role that women can play in development, also in order to reduce food and nutritional insecurity, by promoting, in parallel, women’s participation in economic activities, in particular in agriculture and the rural economy.
2013/10/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57 a (new)
(57a) In view of their knowledge of wild species, hunters are recognised as watchdogs, and have assumed this role on previous occasions, for example during the rabies and H1N1 epidemics.
2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 120 #

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57 b (new)
(57b) Hunters have knowledge of the diseases affecting large game, as they are now required to do, for example under Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 135 #

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87
(87) The occurrence of a listed disease in wild animals may pose a risk to public health and the health of kept animals, or vice versa. Special rules should therefore be laid down for disease control and eradication measures in wild animals, or, where needed, in kept animals.
2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 223 #

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e – point iii
iii) the welfare of affected subpopulations of kept and wild animals;
2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A
A. whereas certain petitions have been deposited requesting that the establishment of the European Parliament in more than one place be discontinuedEuropean Parliament should no longer have three places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 36 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructed despite the widespread interest in the issue amongst MEPs;deleted
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 47 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C a (new)
Ca. whereas two judgments given by the Court of Justice of the European Union in 1997 and 2012 recalled that the TFEU locates the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg and whereas the conditions for the application of Protocol No 6 have been clarified;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 52 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C b (new)
Cb. whereas all the countries which have joined the European Union have ratified Protocol No 6;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 55 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C c (new)
Cc. whereas Strasbourg has been the meeting place of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe since 1949 and then, from 1952, played host to the Parliamentary Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 57 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C d (new)
Cd. whereas the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg was confirmed by the Edinburgh European Council in 1992 and the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 and then incorporated in the Lisbon Treaty in 2009;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 58 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C e (new)
Ce. whereas the distribution of the seats of the European Institutions is based on the principle of polycentrism;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 59 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C f (new)
Cf. whereas, if a debate is initiated concerning the seat of the European Parliament, it will inevitably lead to discussion of the distribution of the seats of the European Institutions, which is laid down in the Treaty;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 67 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decision by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to draw up a report on the location of the seats of the European Union’s institutions;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 121 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be able to state a preference for its futuresystem of a single seat and three places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 135 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that European integration necessarily entails mobility and that this applies to all national and European political representatives and officials, and that mobility is an intrinsic aspect of the work of MEPs, as representatives of the European Union;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 139 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Considers that decentralisation of the legislative authority away from Brussels strengthens its independence;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 141 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Considers that choice of the EU institutions’ seats has always been guided by a desire to bring the Union as close to ordinary people as possible and not to concentrate it in one place;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 153 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for Parliament to express its view as to whether the current arrangement should continue; and if an appropriate majority vote is Emphasises that the Committee’s report was prepared under the ordinary own- initiative procedure and there is thus no obligation to implement the proposals, and further that the matter of the EU institutions’ seats is governed directly by the Treaties and is therecforded, recommends that Parliament propose Treaty changes under Article 48.e subject to the political will of the Member States acting unanimously;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 157 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that the own-initiative report cannot be used as means of circumventing the EU Treaties, which provide that the seat of the European Parliament shall be in Strasbourg and that 12 part-sessions per year shall be held there.
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas it should be noted that unemployed women are often not included in official figures because they tend to withdraw from the labour market and to perform unpaid or informal work, and that there are currently few studies on the impact of cuts in public expenditure allocated to gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas for women a fall in the number of jobs frequently goes hand in hand with an adjustment in working hours, and whereas it is extremely likely that recovery will be felt more rapidly in the industrial sector thereby bringing about recovery in male employment, which will pick up faster than female employment; whereas economy measures in the public services will have a more lasting effect on female employment, and this could jeopardise, in the long-term, the progress achieved in the field of gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 48 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Ha (new)
Ha. Whereas the budget cuts in social services compromise women’s financial independence, as such services often provide a major supplement to their income and they utilise those services more frequently than men, with single mothers and women pensioners living alone being faced with the greatest aggregate losses;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Ja (new)
Ja. Notes that the decrease in the employment gap between men and women is more a reflection of a general degeneration in living and working conditions than of progress towards increased gender equality,
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 117 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote vocational- training policies and programmes for women, in order to increase their participation in the various business sectors, and especially in those economic and financial sectors where women employees are scarce, envisaging specific support measures so women are able to combine their workload, training and family life; recalls the important role played by the European Social Fund in assisting entry into employment through training policies and suggests the Member States and local authorities promote recourse to this fund;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 143 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Council to adopt an action plan to achieve the targets that were set in Barcelona for better childcare provision with the development of company and inter- company crèches; stresses the importance of collective bargaining between management and labour in order to improve the work-life balance at sectoral, national and regional level, and of relaxing the access and attendance conditions for childcare systems associated with categories of jobs performed by women and of setting a minimum period of three month’s notice for childcare placements, so as to enable women to reconcile their family and working lives;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 18a (new)
18a. Stresses the need for an even spread in austerity programmes, particularly as regards maintaining healthcare and caring services, in order not to aggravate the care burden on women, which would drag them back into a traditional family role;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 159 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 19a (new)
19a. Pending EU-wide harmonisation of maternity, paternity and parental leave, calls on the Member States to maintain these and family allowances at the same levels in order not to reduce women’s income, and also to ensure that women’s maternity leave rights are not infringed;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 169 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 21a (new)
21a. Calls for assistance to women’s organisations and to gender equality organisations to be maintained in order not to compromise the active participation of women in social and political life; so that those organisations and bodies can play a key role in offering support to women and their projects and actively participate in preparing future recovery measures,
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 24a (new)
24a. Invites the Member States to adopt budgetary instruments that reflect the need for gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2012/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5a (new)
5a. Highlights the need to identify and exchange Member States’ most effective practices for combating abuses;
2013/02/27
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 10 #

2012/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8a (new)
8a. Emphasises that attention must be paid to ways of optimising reimbursement procedures, which are still relatively lengthy;
2013/02/27
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 19 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
– having regard to the conclusions adopted by the UN Commission on the Status of Women at its 57th session on 15 March 2013, which acknowledge specifically for the first time in an international text the phenomenon of gender-related killings or ‘femicides’,
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 21 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas ‘gendercide’ is a sex-neutral termand ‘femicide’ are concepts which are defined in various international texts and which referring to the systematic, deliberate and gender-selective massurders and killings of people (either male or female) belonging to a particular sex (or gender), reported to be a rising problem in several countries, taking also the forms of infanticide and lethal violence against a particular gender at any stage of life; whereas gender roles may have lethal consequences analogous to those of racial, religious and class prejudicewhich women and girls are the main victims; whereas this phenomenon is a rising problem in several countries and can take a number of forms, including lethal violence against women and girls; whereas the present state of affairs is also a consequence of gender stereotypes;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas it is still the case that hundreds of thousands of women every year are victims of femicide, whether honour crimes, marital violence, sex-selective abortions, sexual violence in conflicts, or even killings on a larger scale, hence the use of the term femicide to refer to genocide against women;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas women in every country of the world are victims of violence and killings on account of gender stereotypes which are degrading to women and which present them as inferior to men;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas according to UN-Women 329 708 rapes are committed each year worldwide (reported rapes); whereas most rape victims do not press charges against their attackers;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 33 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas gendercide is a global issue of concern not only in Asia and Europe but also in North America, Africa and Latin America; whereas gendercide is committed everywhere pregnant women, on purpose or under pressure, decide not to give birth to girl foetuses because they are considered a burden to the society;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas gendercide and femicide refer to all harmful practices which result in the deaths of women worldwide and which are perpetrated simply because they are women, such as sex-selective abortions, marital violence, rape and mutilations, and so-called ‘honour crimes’;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 39 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas in Europe there are particularly distorted sex ratios in some countries, given that, in 2012, 112 boys were born for every 100 girls in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia;(Does not affect English version.)
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas inadequate social security systems, schemes and insurance options for families in several cultures may, misleadingly, lead to ‘son preference’ and to sex-selective practices;deleted
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 44 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas sex-selective practices disrupt gender balance in societies, cause skewed population sex ratios and have economic and social impacts;deleted
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas the occurrence of sex-selective practises, higher rates of mortality among very young girls and lower rates of school enrolment for girls than boys, may suggest that a ‘son preference’ culture is prevailing in some societies; it is important to investigate and diagnose whether such phenomena are accompanied by further democratic deficits against girl children, such asmale-dominated culture leads to democratic shortcomings which affect women and girls, such as poor levels of schooling among girls, deterioration in their access to nutrition, education, health care, sanitation facilities, safe water, medical care and social assistance, in order to find effective ways to combat them; whereas effective measures need to be taken to tackle this phenomenon;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the term gendercide or femicide is also used to refer to the situation in which women are victims of violence during conflicts, in particular of rape used as a weapon of war;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O b (new)
Ob. whereas armed groups use rape as a weapon of war, but whereas mass rapes attract less attention from the international community;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O c (new)
Oc. whereas the term femicide is also used to refer to all rape survivors, and whereas greater account should be taken of the diseases affecting rape victims and their diminished life prospects;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on governments to work proactively to prohibit any sex-selective practisesspecifically categorise femicide or gendercide as a crime and to draw up and implement legislation so that femicide cases are investigated, perpetrators are tried and survivors have easy access to health care and long-term support;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 60 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on governments to devise and apply measures which promote fundamental change to people’s ideas about and attitudes towards women in order to tackle harmful beliefs and behaviour which perpetuate violence against women;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that all States and governments have an obligation to promote and safeguard human rights and to prevent discrimination as a basis for eliminating all forms of violence against women;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 66 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need, and calls on the Commission, to promote a thorough scientific investigation and examination of the root causes of sex-selective practices with a view to promote research into those country-specific customs and traditions that may lead to sex selection and the long-term societal consequences of sex selection;deleted
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 92 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to work intensively to prevent gender-biased sex selection, not by imposing restrictions on access to reproductive health services and technology but by promoting responsible use of itselective abortions by promoting responsible use of maternal health services and technology, to introduce and strengthen guidelines, to provide specialised training for medical staff to advise on and prevent sex selective practices, with the rare exception of justified cases for sex-linked genetic diseasuch practices, and to prevent the use and promotion of technologies for sex- selection and/or for profit purposes;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 97 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Encourages closer engagement and cooperation between governments and the medical community, in order to actively prevent sex selection as a business for financial gainCalls on governments to work closely with civil society and with professional bodies in the legal, medical and welfare spheres in order to devise and adopt effective policies aimed at eradicating gendercide or femicide in all its forms, including honour crimes, marital violence and selective abortions;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 100 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that ensuring equal opportunities for women and girls, particularly in education and employment, is vital for eradicating ‘son preference’ and sex-selective practicesand promoting the rights of women and girls, by offering them equal opportunities, particularly in education and employment, is vital for tackling sexism and building a society in which the principle of gender equality becomes a reality;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 104 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission, to educate couples to have mutual respect concerning sexuality and fertility and to educate men on the importance of women’s health and well-beinghe EEAS and the governments of third countries to devise information campaigns which promote the principle of gender equality and which seek to raise awareness of the need for each member of a couple to respect the human rights of his/her partner, particularly rights in respect of property, employment, appropriate health care, justice and education;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 107 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls the MDGs and stresses that access to education and healthcare are basic human rights; stresses the need for making special and specific reference to gendercide and sex-selection issuesthe issue of gendercide or femicide, on the basis of a holistic approach, in dialogues and reports on the MDGs and in other experience-sharing international fora;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 118 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that sex-selection practicesharmful and violent practices which result in the deaths of women and girls and which are perpetrated simply because they are female, such as marital and sexual violence, honour crimes, sexual exploitation and trafficking of women, mutilations and sex-selective abortions, still persist even in prosperous regions with literate populations;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Encourages the development of support mechanisms for women and families that can provide information and advice to women about the dangers and damage of sex-selective practices and to provide counselling to support women who may be under pressure to eliminate female foetusesir rights and help and support women who are victims of violence;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 122 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Encourages civil society and government agencies to take joint action to promote information and public awareness campaigns about the principle of gender equality, the prevention of violence against women, and the negative consequences of sex-selectiveist practices for both the foetus and the mother; on the bodies and lives of women and girls;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 127 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission and all relevant stakeholders to take the necessary legislative or other measures to ensure that practicing forced abortions and sex-selective surgery to terminate pregnancy without prior and informed consent or understanding of the procedure by the women involved is criminalised;deleted
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 133 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation with other international organisations and bodies such as the UN, WHO, UNICEF, OHCHR, UNFPA and UN Women to tackle sex-selective practicesall forms of violence against women and to combat their root causes in all countries, and to network with governments, parliaments, various stakeholders, media, non-governmental organisations, women organisations and other community bodies in order to increase awareness of gendercide and ways to prevent it;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 136 #

2012/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Commission and the EU delegations to include gendercide or femicide, on the basis of a holistic approach, in the extended political dialogue agenda with relevant third countries, enjoining them to commit themselves to make the eradication of gendercide or femicide a priority, to increase awareness about this issue and to press for its prevention;
2013/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 2 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the EU guidelines on violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas many minors arrive in the EU because they are fleeing forced marriages, and whereas the EU must do more to combat this phenomenon;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas gender equality and the equal protection of human rights of unaccompanied migrant girls and boys must be ensured, and whereas special attention must be paid to the violation of human rights of girls and the provision of adequate support and appropriate remedies;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 33 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that an unaccompanied minor is above all a minor who is potentially in danger and that child protection, rather than immigration controlegardless of their migratory status, must be the major consideration for States and the European Union when dealing with them; .
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 39 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls also that the overriding interests of the child, as enshrined in provisions and case-law, must take priority over any other consideration in any act taken with regard to them, whether by public authorities or by private institutions; calls on the Commission to propose a common definition and reference framework, based on a set of indices, to assess what constitutes the overriding interests of a child; and to implement legislative and non-legislative actions to ensure adequate protection of children and unaccompanied minors, in particular, improving methods of finding durable solutions.
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 46 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the adoption by the Commission of an action plan on unaccompanied minors; deplores, however, the fact that the Commission's approach is not based more on protecting the fundamental rights of such minors and of the Mid- term report on the implementation of the Action Plan on Unaccompanied Minors' (COM(2012)0554;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 47 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the fragmentation of the European provisions concerning unaccompanied minors and; urges the Commission to compile a manual drawing together these various legal basesacts in order to facilitate the correct application by Member States; considers that EASO should be involved in compiling this manual;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 53 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Deplores the lack of reliable official data on unaccompanied minors; calls on the Member States and the European Union to establish a coordinated method for gathering information in each Member State and to improve the comparability of data collection across EU Member States, by means of platforms bringing together all parties involved in the problem of unaccompanied minors, and to draw up a list of national contact points;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 56 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Deplores the lack of reliable official data on unaccompanied minors; calls on the Member States and the European Union to establish a coordinated method for gathering information in each Member State, by means of platforms bringing together all parties involved in the problem of unaccompanied minors, and to draw up a list of national contact pointsand sharing information, and to make better use of the existing tools available to collect statistics data at the European level, such as Fronted and EASO;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 57 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Deplores the lack of reliable official data on unaccompanied minors including age and gender disaggregated statistics; calls on the Member States and the European Union to establish a coordinated method for gathering information in each Member State, by means of platforms bringing together all parties involved in the problem of unaccompanied minors, and to draw up a list of national contact points;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 59 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the European Union and Member States ought to step up theirshould continue to integrate migration and particularly migration of children into development cooperation, to step up partnership agreements to foster the cooperation with third countries of origin and transit concerning the problem of unaccompanied minors, preventing their arrival, combating trafficking in human beings, irregular immigration, restoration of family ties, return and readmission, in the context of the regular dialogues conducted between the European Union and these States and the European External Action Service (EEAS);
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 64 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the European Union and Member States ought to step up their cooperation with third countries of origin and transit concerning the problem of unaccompanied minors, preventing their arrival, combating trafficking, irregular immigration, forced marriages, restoration of family ties, return and readmission, in the context of the regular dialogues conducted between the European Union and these States and the European External Action Service (EEAS);
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the European Union and Member States ought to step up their cooperation with third countries of origin and transit concerning the problem of unaccompanied minors, preventing their arrival, combating trafficking, irregular immigration, restoration of family ties, return and readmission, including in the context of the regular dialogues conducted between the European Union and these States and the European External Action Service (EEAS);
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 70 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the important role of civil society in the readmissions of unaccompanied minors in third countries; calls thus on Member States to increase cooperation also with local and international non governmental partners in the Country of origin in order to ensure safe returns for children.
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 72 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that combating trafficking in human beings is a necessary first step, as minors are particularly confronted with the risks of trafficking and exploitation and because; underlines the importance of prevention by strengthening police and judiciary cooperation between Member States. Calls on the Member States to effectively implement Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims and Directive 2011/92/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography; considers also that action should be taken in third countries to tackle the root causes of trafficking;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 75 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that combating trafficking in human beings is a necessary first step, as minors are particularly vulnerable to trafficking in human beings and confronted with the risks of trafficking and exploitation and because action should be taken in third countries to tackle the root causes of trafficking;. In this regard Member States and the European Union should cooperate with the EU-Anti- Trafficking Coordinator to detect potential victims, to sensitise the public and to combat trafficking in human beings.
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 78 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that combating trafficking in human beings is a necessary first step, as minors and especially girls are particularly confronted with the risks of trafficking and exploitation and because action should be taken in third countries to tackle the root causes of trafficking;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 82 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Is concerned about the situation of many unaccompanied minors who live in hiding in the EU and who are particularly vulnerable to exploitation and abuse; calls on Member States' authorities and civil society organisations to work together and take all the necessary measures to ensure their protection and dignity.
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 95 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to draw up binding strategic guidelines for use by all Member States, which should draw inspiration from their best practices, take the form of common minimum standards and detail each stage in the probuilding on the follow-up of the Action plan and on best practicess, from the arrival of a minor in European territory until an appropriate solution has been found for him;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 99 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to draw up binding strategic guidelines for use by all Member States, which should draw inspiration from their best practices, take the form of common minimum standards and detail each stage in the process, from the arrival of a minor in European territory until an appropriate solution has been found for him or her;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 116 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that each Member State has a responsibility to identify unaccompanied minors; calls on Member States to direct them immediately to specialist services which must, on the one hand, assess the individual circumstances and needs of each minor and, on the other hand, provide them with all the information they need, in a language and form they can understand; calls on Member States to share best practices on child friendly tools to clarify to the children the procedures and their rights;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 128 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Deplores the unsuitable and intrusive nature of the medical techniques used to ascertain age in some Member States; recommends that the Commission establish a common methodinclude in the strategic guidelines best practices for ascertaining age, consisting of a multidisciplinary assessment, performed by independent, trained practitioners, and with minors always being given the benefit of the doubt; considers that it should be possible to appeal against the results of this assessment; welcomes the work of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) on this subject, which should be taken as a basis for dealing with all minors;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 130 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Deplores the unsuitable and intrusive nature of the medical techniques used to ascertain age in some Member States; recommends that the Commission establish a common method for ascertaining age, consisting of a multidisciplinary assessment performed by independent, trained practitioners, and with minors always being given the benefit of the doubt; considers that it should be possible to appeal against the results of this assessment; welcomes the work of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) on this subject, which should be taken as a basis for dealing with all minors with particular attention to girls;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 133 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on Member States, as soon as a minor arrives within their territory and until a lasting solution has been found, to appoint a person responsible for accompanying, assisting and representing him in allto enable the minor to benefit from all the rights and to comply with all obligations of the procedures; calls furthermore for this person to have specific training in the problems associated with unaccompanied minors and to act completely independently; calls on the Commission to establish common standardinclude in the strategic guidelines and best practices concerning the mandate, functions, qualifications and skills of this person; (This wording is in line with Art. 25.1 on "Guarantees for unaccompanied minors" of the agreement on 2009/0165 (COD) on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, which has been adopted by LIBE in April 2013.)
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 136 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on Member States, as soon as a minor arrives within their territory and until a lasting solution has been found, to appoint a person responsible for accompanying, assisting and representing him in all procedures; calls furthermore for this person to have specific training in the problems associated with unaccompanied minors and to act completely independently; calls on the Commission to establish common standardinclude in the strategic guidelines best practices concerning the mandate, functions, qualifications and skills of this person;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 141 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on Member States, as soon as a minor arrives within their territory and until a lasting solution has been found, to appoint a person responsible for accompanying, assisting and representing him or her in all procedures; calls furthermore for this person to have specific training in the problems associated with unaccompanied minors and to act completely independently; calls on the Commission to establish common standards concerning the mandate, functions, qualifications and skills of this person;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 145 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – introductory part
16. CIn order to ensure consistency and equal standards in the protection of unaccompanied minors within the EU, calls on Member States to give unaccompanied minors, irrespective of their status and under the same conditions as children who are nationals of the host country:
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 165 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 4
– the right to health and the access to medical care;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 176 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the progress which has been made in asylum legislation; recalls, however, that unaccompanied minors should always be exempted from expedited procedures and from procedures at the border; recalls also that the State responsible forpackage concerning unaccompanied minors; calls on Member States to make the necessary legislative and asylum application by an unaccompanied mdministrative reforms in or should always be the State of the most recent asylum applicationder to implement it effectively;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 181 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines that any decision concerning unaccompanied minors should be on the basis of an individual assessment and in respect of the best interest of the child;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 183 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Condemns the very precarious circumstances with which these minors are suddenly confronted when they reach the age of majority; calls on Member States to share best practices and institute procedures for assisting these minors in their transition to adulthood; welcomes the work of the Council of Europe on this subject and calls on the Commission to propose common standardinclude in its strategic guidelines best practices for the planning of ‘individualised life projects’ for, and with, the minor;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 191 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses firmly that the ultimate aim, once an unaccompanied minor has arrived in European territory, must be to seek an appropriate solution for him, which respects his best interests; recalls that efforts to achieve this must always begin with an examination of the possibilities of family reunification; calls on Member States to improve cooperation on family tracing and share best practices;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 196 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses firmly that the ultimate aim, once an unaccompanied minor has arrived in European territory, must be to seek an appropriate solution for him or her, which respects his or her interests; recalls that efforts to achieve this must always begin with an examination of the possibilities of family reunification;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 201 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to proposeinclude in its strategic guidelines a common reference framework outlining a series of conditions to be met before a minor can be returned, respecting the overriding interests of the child; reiterates in the strongest terms that no decision to return a minor may be taken if it endangers the minor's life, security or fundamental rights or those of his or her family, and that the individual circumstances of each minor must be taken into account; calls on Member States to establish monitoringcooperation arrangements to ensure the protection of minors after their return, in cooperation with countries of origin and transit;with countries of origin and transit and with international and local NGOs in order to ensure the protection of minors after their return.
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 202 #

2012/2263(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to propose a common reference framework outlining a series of conditions to be met before a minor can be returned, respecting the overriding interests of the child; reiterates in the strongest terms that no decision to return a minor may be taken if it endangers the minor's life, security or fundamental rights or those of his or her family, and that the individual circumstances of each minor must be taken into account; calls on Member States to establish monitoring arrangements to ensure the protection of minors after their return, in cooperation with countries of origin and transit; calls on the European Union to commit to improve its response to end potential drivers of migration including early and forced marriage, harmful traditional practices including female genital mutilation and sexual violence worldwide;
2013/05/13
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Union’s policy on development cooperation is guided by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and, two of those Goalswhich specifically concern women – MDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower women and MDG 5: Improve maternal health, – while a further three contribute directly to improving the living conditions of women and girls – MDG 2: Achieve universal primary education, MDG 4: Reduce child mortality and MDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas sexual violence in the form of mass rapes, human trafficking and other forms of sexual abuse of women and children is still used as a tactic of war by armed forces and perpetrators of sexual violence in conflict regions, and notably in certain ACP countries; whereas rape in wartime has been recognised by the United Nations as a crime against humanity, and whereas since 2008 the United Nations Security Council has been committed to combating the use of sexual violence as a tactic of war;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas where more women are engaged in conflict resolution and peace-building processes, they play a key role in peace negotiations, broadening the scope of reconstruction, rehabilitation and peace building;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction at the recognition given in various action plans and communications to the key role played in development by gender equality and women’s empowerment, and calls for that priority to be put into practice in the geographic programmes; calls also for better coordination with the thematic programmes financed via Intra-ACP cooperation and the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI);
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a stepping-up of efforts to achieve the MDGs relating to gender equality and maternal health and requests that measures immediately be considered for the post-2015 period, notably in regard to MDG 3 on gender equality and empowering women and MDG 5 on maternal health, reproductive health and access to family planning;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the move by the UNFPA to set up a high level taskforce to head up the review of the International Conference on Population and Development, particularly in regard to women’s sexual and reproductive rights, their right to reproductive health and combating HIV/AIDS;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Draws attention to the fact that progress on MDG 2 on education has been mixed as progress has been made in terms of schooling for girls, but not in regard to their completing their studies; calls on the ACP countries and all international partners to devise and implement as priority development policies all the measures necessary for girls to finish primary school and have access to secondary and higher education;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls therefore for enhanced financing for programmes which aim at ensuring all girls have access to education (bearing in mind that female education is a cornerstone in building more egalitarian societies), at promoting women’s economic independence and reducing sexual exploitation of girls and women worldwide;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls that democracy entails the full participation by women in public life, as stated in international and regional instruments such as the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the rights of women in Africa;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Strongly supports the inclusion of Gender Advisors or Gender Focal Points in EU delegations and common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions, and calls on the High Representative/Vice-President to provide them with resources and the appropriate means and spheres of activity;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Affirms the key role of women in democratic transition processes, in state-building and consolidation and in conflict resolution, pacification and stabilisation; encourages the Commission, the EEAS and the ACP countries to promote tangible and voluntary policies that promote the presence of women around negotiating tables and in political and economic decision-making positions;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Calls on the Commission to apply the performance indicators established in the EU plan of action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development: 1) at least 80 % of funds to include gender-sensitive indicators, 2) at least 75 % of all projects or programmes to score gender as a principle objective (G-2) or gender as a significant objective (G-1), and 3) at least 50 % of indicative multiannual programmes to identify gender-equality related actions;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Asks the Commission to provide the European Parliament with a progress report on implementation of the EU plan of action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2012/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. It is necessary to distinguish clearly betweenemphasize that both legal and illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants voluntarily opt to ignore the law, and should therefore be identified and deported. Any attempt are current phenomena. We need a common legal framework on migration policies in order to protect migrants and potential victims, especially women and children. They are vulnerable to vargue in favour of supporting and regularising illegal migrants undermines democratic acceptance of thious forms of organised crime in the context of migration, human trafficking for instance. Illegal migration can be presence of migrants in the EUduced through a common legal framework.
2012/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 22 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, in order to achieve work-life balance, women, in addition to the unpaid work of looking after their home and their family, often opt, choose flexible home- based, part-time, tempor are forced to opt, for part-time, intermittent, or atypical work, a fact duly reflected in the pension contributions that they manage to accumulatey or atypical employment, thereby compromising their career advancement, with major consequences in terms of their pension contributions, making them particularly vulnerable to situations of insecurity and poverty;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas elderly women, particularly those living in isolation, frequently find themselves in difficult social and economic situations affecting their quality of life and state of physical and mental health;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I c (new)
Ic. notes that all these factors, including isolation, make it harder for elderly women to stay active and lead full social lives;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital S
S. whereas equal access to health services for women and men must be guaranteed and the quality of health care needs to be improved;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T
T. whereas because of the above- mentioned inequalities in terms of income and economic circumstances, older women havethe economic situation of elderly women affected by gender-based inequalities with regard to earnings, pensions and other forms of income leaves them particularly vulnerable with regard to situations of insecurity and poverty and with less to spend on cuthe health cares and medical treatments which they need;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 60 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U
U. whereas prevention, and early detection andresult in improvement of the population’s physical and mental health of men and women which could lengthen lifthe expectancy of life in good health and reduce health care expenditure, thus making for sustainability in the long term;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 65 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital W
W. whereas women make greater use of medicines and herbal remedies, with the consequent risks of interaction;deleted
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 76 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that, although women live longer than men, they do not haveenjoy more years of good health, that is to say, without being impeded in their activities or suffering from any major incapacity (women: 62.6 years; men: 61.7 years);
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 79 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Maintains that policies aimed at promoting work-life balance put women in a better position to tackle active ageing in good health, and therefore calls on the Member States to intensify their efforts in that direction;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 93 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to publish an assessment of the impact of the economic and financial crisis on elderly women, focusing on access to preventive health care and treatment;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 97 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reiterates the need to build and promote a European Union more sensitive to the needs and interests of elderly women and men and for gender mainstreaming with regard to all information and awareness measures and policies;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 112 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to draw up and implement a specific EU strategy on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of diabetes, also covering information and research, including a cross-cutting gender approach and equality between men and women;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to collect data, taking care to include gender-related elements, serving to identify good practice regarding access to health services, not least with a view to avoiding excessively long waiting lists and the red tape that discourages older women from using prevention systemsin particular avoiding cumbersome administrative procedures and formulating specific measures and policies improving quality of life for elderly women;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 181 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to launch specific awareness campaigns, targeting elderly women, more specifically, focusing on correct nutrition and the importance of physical exercise, given that these can help reduce the incidence of heart and circulatory disorders, osteoporosis, and some types of cancer;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 190 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote women’s rights with a view to combating all forms of age- and gender-based violence and discrimination, for example through awareness and information campaigns targeted at the entire European populace from a very early age;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 13 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the role played by women in revolutions is no different from that which they are required to play at times of democratic transition and state rebuilding; whereas the success of these processes is entirely contingent on the full involvement of women at all levels of decision-making;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the authorities of the countries concerned to enshrine in their constitution the principle of equality between men and women and the prohibition of all forms of discrimination and violence against women and to reform all existing laws that discriminate against women, including in the area of marriage, divorce, child custody, parental rights, nationality, inheritance, legal capacity, etc., in line with international and regional instruments;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls the open debate among IslamicMuslim women scholars with a view to interpreting religious texts in a women’s rights and equality perspective;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages States to engage in an inclusive, wide-ranging and voluntary debate with all stakeholders, that is civil society, social partners, local women's organisations, local authorities, and religious leaders, among others, and to ensure that women's rights and the principle of equality between men and women are protected and upheld;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Condemns the use of all forms of violence, particularly sexual violence, before, during and after the uprisings and its continuous use as a form of political pressure, and stresses that the International Criminal Court could intervene if no judicial action is possible at national level;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 87 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that discrimination or violence of any kind against women or girls cannot be justified on the grounds of culture, tradition or religion;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 88 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the need to strengthen access to health and social services for women and girls, particularly with regard to maternal and reproductive healthhealth, access to vital medical treatment and to family planning; draws the attention of national authorities and national partners to the conclusions of the report by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) entitled 'By choice, not by chance: family planning, human rights and development’;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 115 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance of establishing and funding training courses to prepare women for political leadership, and of any other measures which would help to empower women and to ensure that they participate fully in political, economic and social life;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that the governments and parliaments of North African countries should make it a priority to ensure that girls have access to high-quality secondary and higher education, given that this is a means of boosting development and economic growth and guaranteeing democratic stability;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 136 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on national public authorities to devise framework policies on micro-finance in order to counter unintended consequences, such as over-indebtedness, which women may face owing to a lack of information or relevant legal provisions;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 137 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Encourages North African countries to establish support mechanisms for women entrepreneurs, including through the provision of relevant information, legal protection, and professional advancement and management training courses;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 150 #

2012/2102(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the Commission to continue monitoring the way in which North African countries are implementing the recommendations on women’s rights made by EU election observation missions and to submit a report to Parliament;
2013/01/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 72 #

2012/2077(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that quality products are those that are linked to specific production methods, geographical origins, traditions or cultural contexts, and notes that schemes to protect these already exist in the form of PDOs, PGIs, organic products or TSGs; calls for a new 'local farming and direct sale' scheme to cover local quality products intended for consumption in the region where they are produced; calls for greater promotion of these products not only in local markets but also across the EU.
2012/08/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 82 #

2012/2077(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the increasing demand for organic products, and calls for more active stimulation of their production and promotion;
2012/08/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 91 #

2012/2077(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that EU promotion activities should explicitly favour types of farming that mitigate climate change and better preserve natural resources, halting biodiversity loss, in particular by protecting bee colonies and reducing damage to natural resources such as soils and water;
2012/08/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. States that maternal death rates are disproportionately high in developing countries; notes with concern that African women are 175 times more likely to die in childbirth than women in the developed regions of the world; stresses that accessible, affordable, adequate and high- quality emergency obstetric care is vital in order to reduce maternal death rates; emphasises that developing countries need increased numbers of qualified healthcare professionals to attend to women in labour and states the need for women to be informed about the sexual and reproductive health services they can access;deleted
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for Policy Coherence for Development to favour a participative approach that promotes the empowerment and self-determination of local people and, first of all, of women;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 14 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the importance of taking account of the most disadvantaged and vulnerable social groups, notably women and girls, and paying particular attention to them to avoid any further increase in inequality; experience has shown that ‘neutral’ measures entrench the existing power structure and it is essential to take positive, informed, systematic action in the form of measures that improve the situation of women, so as to ensure that such measures benefit the most disadvantaged;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the unequal relationship between the sexes is the first stumbling block to be overcome by measures to improve the living conditions of people (women and men) in developing countries and women’s access to participative development;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Stresses the need for CPD to incorporate a global approach which extends beyond the family and microsocial level and takes gender relations into account; this cross-cutting approach to gender issues needs to be incorporated in every development project and every analysis of a society; the approach must apply not only to all sectors but also in all political, economic, social, environmental, cultural and other fields; such an approach, which systematically takes account of the situation and role of women and gender relations in a society, is more comprehensive, humanistic and democratic than an approach which sets women apart; it avoids marginalising women in ‘women’s projects’ or projects which add to women’s workloads or responsibilities without increasing their power or control over the benefits generated by the projects in question;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Stresses the role of women in leveraging development policies by participating in the formulation and implementation of such policies, thereby ensuring that political and economic negotiations take women’s interests into account and creating a virtuous circle in which women are the driving force behind development policies which, in turn, set up the structures whereby women can be empowered; highlights the importance of supporting civil society organisations and groups which take on the task of promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 21 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Notes that women play an essential part in development, since, in their role as mothers and carers for children and other dependent members of the family, they assume responsibility for the family’s general well-being; for example, women play a crucial role in the field of nutrition and food security, particularly in the context of subsistance farming;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Stresses that the situation of women is, in many cases, deteriorating more than that of men both in relative and absolute terms; there has been an increase in poverty over the last twenty years or so, which has primarily affected women;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Stresses that, although the important role played by women in development policies and development cooperation is very widely recognised, the statistics and quantitative data which specifically relate to women are still inadequate and fail to meet the objective of reporting the situation of women in developing countries, particularly in fields such as health, education, prevention and meeting basic needs; care must be taken to ensure, therefore, that in all PCD objectives, analyses, documents and assessments the quantitative data is broken down by gender, and gender-specific indicators are included, in order to take account of women’s real living conditions;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 24 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms that girl children have equal status under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and calls on EU delegations in developing countries to work with the governments of those countries to ensure that girl children enjoy their rights without discrimination, inter alia by requiring the immediate registration of all children after birth, granting girls and boys equal entitlement to education and schooling and ending the unethical and discriminatory practices of prenatal sex selection, abortion of female foetuses, female infanticide, early forced marriage, female genital mutilation and child prostitution;deleted
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2012/2063(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses concern about widespread gender-based violence, especially sexual violence and feminicide, in developing countries; states that upholding women’s rights, including their sexual and reproductive rights, is essential in order to end gender-based violence; calls on the Commission to make the fight against impunity for the perpetrators of such violence one of the priorities for its development assistance policy;deleted
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2012/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 а (new)
19а. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s cooperation with the European Network of Ombudsmen and asks that such cooperation be directed inter alia to publicising the European Citizen’s Initiative as a new tool enabling citizens to be involved directly in the process of preparing EC legislation;
2012/07/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 51 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure the integrity and the visibility of health warnings and maximise their efficacy, provisions should be made regarding the dimension of the warnings as well as regarding certain aspects of the appearance of the tobacco package, including the opening mechanism. The package and the products may mislead consumers, in particular young people, suggesting that products are less harmful. For instance, this is the case with certain texts or features, such as ‘low-tar’, ‘light’, ‘ultra-light’, ‘mild’, 'natural', 'organic', ‘without additives’, ‘without flavours’, 'slim', names, pictures, and figurative or other signs. Likewise, the size and appearance of individual cigarettes can mislead consumers by creating the impression that they are less harmful. A recent study has also shown that smokers of slim cigarettes were more likely to believe that their own brand might be less harmful. This should be addressed.
2013/05/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 343 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In the report, the Commission shall indicate in particular the features which should be reviewed or developed in the light of developments in scientific and technical knowledge, including the development of internationally agreed rules and standards on products, and the socio- economic impact of the Directive’s application, and shall pay special heed to:
2013/05/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 345 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c а (new)
(cа) the impact on production and employment in the tobacco sector, paying particular attention to small and medium- sized farmers.
2013/05/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 347 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall not prohibit or restrict the import, sale or consumption of tobacco or related products which comply with this Directive. At the same time, measures must be taken to restrict the import of tobacco products, including from third countries, which do not comply with this Directive.
2013/05/07
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2012/0337(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 26 – subparagraph 2 – point b а (new)
(ba) Taking further steps to safeguard, boost and support agricultural sectors that make a proven contribution to biodiversity, and in particular the bee keeping sector.
2013/03/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 101 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Listed companies in the Union should be imposed obligations of means providing for appropriate procedures with a view of meeting specific objectives regarding the gender composition of their boards. Taim to reach the objective of having at least 40 per cent of non-executive directors of the under-represented sex at the latest by 1 January 2020. For the purpose of reaching this objective, those listed companies in whose boards members of the under-represented sex hold less than 40 per cent of non- executive director positions should make thecarry out the pre- selection or selection procedure for appointments to those positions on the basis of a comparative analysis of the qualifications of each candidate, by applying pre-established, clear, neutrally formulated and unambiguous criteria, in order to attain the said percentage at the latest by 1 January 2020. Therefore, the Directive establishes the objective of at least 40 per cent of non-executive directors of the under-represented sex by that date. This objective in principle only concerns the overall gender diversity among the non-executive directors and does not interfere with the concrete choice of individual directors from a wide pool of male and female candidates in each individual case. In particular, it does not exclude any particular candidates for director positions, nor does it impose any individual directors on companies or shareholders. The decision on the appropriate board members thus remains with the companies and shareholders.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 103 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) The objective of 40% in principle only concerns the overall gender diversity among the non-executive directors and does not interfere with the concrete choice of individual directors from a wide pool of male and female candidates in each individual case. In particular, it does not exclude any particular candidates for director positions, nor does it impose any individual directors on companies or shareholders. The decision on the appropriate board members thus remains with the companies and shareholders.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 203 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that listed companies in whose boardsaim to reach the objective that members of the under-represented sex hold less thanat least 40 per cent of the non-executive director positions make the appointments to those positions on the basis of a comparative analysis of the qualifications of each candidate, by applying pre-established, clear, neutrally formulated and unambiguous criteria, in order to attain the said percentage at the latest by 1 January 2020 or at the latest by 1 January 2018 in case of listed companies which are public undertakings.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 206 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that in listed companies in whose boards members of the underreprensented sex hold less than 40 per cent of the non- executive director positions the pre- selection or selection procedure for appointments to those positions is carried out on the basis of a comparative analysis of the qualifications of each candidate, by applying pre-established, clear, neutrally formulated and unambiguous criteria, until the objective set out in paragraph 1 is reached.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 267 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall lay down rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant togiving effect to Articles 4(1a), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) of this Directive and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that they are applied.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 299 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 4(6) and (7), Member States which before the entry into force of this Directive have already taken measures to ensure a more balanced representation of women and men among the non-executive directors of listed companies may suspend the application of the procedural requirements relating to appointments contained in Article 4(1a), (3), (4) and (5), provided that it can be shown that those measures enable members of the under-represented sex to hold at least 40 per cent of the non-executive director positions of listed companies by at the latest 1 January 2020, or at the latest 1 January 2018 for listed companies which are public undertakings.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 308 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States having suspended pursuant to Article 8(3) the application of the procedural requirements relating to appointments contained in Article 4(1a), (3), (4) and (5) shall include information in the reports mentioned in paragraph 1 demonstrating the concrete results obtained by the national measures referred to in Article 8(3). The Commission shall then issue a specific report ascertaining whether those measures effectively enable members of the under-represented sex to hold at least 40 per cent of the non-executive director positions by 1 January 2018 for listed companies which are public undertakings, and by 1 January 2020 for listed companies which are not public undertakings. The first such report shall be issued by the Commission by 1 July 2017, and subsequent reports shall be issued within six months after notification of the respective national reports under paragraph 1.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 311 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States in question shall ensure that listed companies, which by applying the national measures referred to in Article 8(3) have not appointed or elected members of the under-represented sex for at least 40 per cent of the non-executive director positions of their boards by 1 January 2018, where they are public undertakings, or by 1 January 2020, where they are not public undertakings, apply the procedural requirements relating to appointments contained in Article 4(1a), (3), (4) and (5) with effect respectively from those dates.
2013/09/02
Committee: JURIFEMM
Amendment 34 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Organised criminal groups operate without borders and increasingly acquire assets in other Member States and in third countries. There is an increasing need for effective international law enforcement cooperation on asset recovery and mutual legal assistance. The adoption of minimum rules will harmonise the Member State's freezing and confiscation regimes facilitating mutual trust and effective cross-border cooperation.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 39 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds following a final decision of a court, both based on a conviction or in the absence of criminal conviction, and of property of equivalent value to those proceeds should therefore refer to this broadened concept for the criminal offences covered by this Directive. Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA required Member States to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime following a final conviction and to enable the confiscation of property of equivalent value to the proceeds of crime. Such obligations should be maintained for the criminal offences not covered by this Directive.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 42 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) The issuance of confiscation orders generally requires a criminal conviction. In some cases, even where a criminal conviction cannot be achieved, it non-conviction based confiscation should still be possible to confiscate assets in order to disrupt criminal activities and ensure that profits resulting from criminal activities are not reinvested into the licit economy. Some Member States allow confiscation where there is insufficient evidence for a criminal prosecution, if a court considers on the balance of probabilities that the property is of illicit origin, and also in situations where a suspect or accused person becomes a fugitive to avoid prosecution, is unable to stand trial for other reasons or died before the end of criminal proceedings. This is referred to as non-conviction based confiscation. Provision should be made to enable non-conviction based confiscation in at least the latter, limited, circumstances in all Member States. This is in line with Article 54.1.c) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, which provides that each State Party is to consider taking the necessary measures to allow confiscation of illicitly acquired property without a criminal conviction, including in cases in which the offender cannot be prosecuted by reason of death, flight or absence.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 66 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) The measures provided for in this Directive affect substantially the rights of persons, not only of suspected or accused persons but also of third parties who are not being prosecuted. It is therefore necessary to provide for specificall necessary safeguards and judicial remedies in order to guarantee the preservation of their fundamental rights in the implementation of the provisions of this Directive.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 84 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to enable itonly judicial authorities to confiscate, either wholly or in part, instrumentalities and proceeds following a final conviction for a criminal offence.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to enable itonly judicial authorities, when the confiscation provided in paragraph 1 is not possible, to confiscate property the value of which corresponds to the proceeds following a final conviction for a criminal offence.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 108 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the death or permanent illness of the suspected or accused person prevents any further prosecution; ordeleted
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 111 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the illness or flight from prosecution or sentencing of the suspected or accused person prevents effective prosecution within a reasonable time, and poses the serious risk that it could be barred by statutory limitations.deleted
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 133 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to enable it to freeze property in danger of being dissipated, hidden or transferred out of the jurisdiction with a view to possible later confiscation. Such measures shall be ordered by a court. It includes the introduction of non- conviction based confiscation, with full respect of the rights of the defence and of bona fide third parties, and that they can be challenged before a court.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 140 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the persons affected by the measures provided for under this Directive have the full right to an effective remedy and that suspects have the right to a fair trial, in order to preserve their rights, including the full right to a fair trail and the possibility to appeal the decision.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 151 #

2012/0036(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Where the person whose property is affected is a third party, the person or the person's lawyer shall be informed of the proceedings that can lead to a decision to confiscate that property and shall be allowed to participate in those proceedings to the extent necessary to effectively preserve the person's rights. That person shall have at least the right to be heard, the right to ask questions and the right to provide evidencethe full right to a fair trail and the right to an effective remedy before a final decision on confiscation is taken.
2013/01/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 413 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Consent should be given explicitunambiguously by any appropriate method enabling a freely given specific and informed indication of the data subject’s wishes, either by a statement or by a clear affirmative action by the data subject, ensuring that individuals are aware that they give their consent to the processing of personal data, including by ticking a box when visiting an Internet website or by any other statement or conduct which clearly indicates in this context the data subject’s acceptance of the proposed processing of their personal data. Silence or inactivity should therefore not constitute consent. Consent should cover all processing activities carried out for the same purpose or purposes. If the data subject’s consent is to be given following an electronic request, the request must be clear, concise and not unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided. The information provided in order for children to express the consent should be given in a clear and age-appropriate language, in a way that it would be easy to understand for a child above the age of 13.
2013/03/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 425 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Children deserve specific protection of their personal data, as they may be less aware of risks, consequences, safeguards and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data and they are also vulnerable consumers. To determine when an individual is a child, this Regulation should take over the definition laid down by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. In particular, child-friendly language should be used to ensure the right of consent for children above the age of 13.
2013/03/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1015 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The information provided in order to express the consent should be given in a clear and age-appropriate language, in a way that would be easy to understand for the child above the age of 13 years.
2013/03/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1603 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In any case, children should not be subject to measures of profiling, as referred to in paragraph 1.
2013/03/06
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 27 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) founds the Union on a community of indivisible and universal values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, gender equality, non-discrimination, solidarity, the rule of law and respect for human rights and civil liberties, for all persons on the territory of the EU, including those belonging to minorities,
2012/08/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the fundamental role of the European Parliament in checking and controlling the drawing-up and implementation of European legislation and insists therefore on the fact that the European Parliament should also strengthen its autonomous impact assessment on fundamental rights in relation to legislative proposals and amendments under examination in the legislative process in order toand make it more systematic;
2012/08/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 127 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to provide a detailed action and work plan of the implications of the appointment of a Special Representative of the Union for Human Rights in analyzing the human rights situation in Union and his or her role in checking the implementation of EU legislation by Member States and the application of international conventions and treaties;
2012/08/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 137 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to properly fulfil their obligations under international law, which they have so far failed to do, to investigate serious human rights violations carried out in the context of cooperation with the CIA counter-terrorism programme, to step up the fight against trafficking in human beings and organised crime and to afford full redress to victims;
2012/08/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 138 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to intensify their cooperation, including with the European Parliament and national parliaments, to improve the implementation of EU human rights legislation and the follow-up of complaints and the correction of any irregularities;
2012/08/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 242 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Regrets the limited impact of EUuropean and national campaigns and initiatives in the area of inequality between men and women, particularly in the context of employmentthe labour market and the representation of women in decision- taking positions;
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 297 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Member States to ensure the integration of younger workers, particularly those affected by the economic crisis, into the labour market, including through the organization and provision of training for the social advancement of young people;
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 301 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Welcomes the decision to make 2012 the European Year of Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations; calls on the Member States to enhance the quality of elderly people’s lives by providing adequate social services, combating abuse against them and promoting their independence by supporting the renovation and accessibility of housing; stresses that men and women over 65 years of age who are active and willing contribute fully and in many different ways to the daily life of society;
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 365 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Stresses its commitment to ensuring full parliamentary scrutiny of the EU’s JHA Agencies, notably Europol, Frontex, Cepol, Eurojust, and the Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems; calls on those agencies to enhance the fundamental rights dimension of their activities and in particular to ensure the protection of fundamental rights in the context of internal and external border controls;
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 445 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Calls upon Member States to prepare information campaigns to promote the active participation of citizens through citizens' initiatives and exercising their right of petition.
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 449 #

2011/2069(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 b (new)
45b. Calls upon Member States to prepare information campaigns to promote the active participation of citizens in exercising their right to submit to the European Ombudsman complaints about acts of maladministration committed by a European institution or body;
2012/07/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 65 #

2011/0427(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably human dignity, prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right to liberty and security, right to the protection of personal data, of access to documents, non-refoulement, non- discrimination and rights of the child. This Regulation should be applied by Member States in accordance with these rights and principles.
2012/09/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 92 #

2011/0427(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and the Agency shall comply with fundamental rights, including data protection requirements, when applying this Regulation. They shall give priority to the special needs of children, in particular unaccompanied minors, victims of trafficking, persons in need of urgent medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation.
2012/09/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 102 #

2011/0427(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point d
(d) ‘cross-border crime’ means any serious or organised crime committed at the external borders of Member States or at their proximity, such as trafficking in human beings, smuggling of drugs and other illicit activities that have a cross- border dimension;
2012/09/27
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The European Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, respect for women’s rights, equality between men and women and non-discrimination, principles which are common to the Member States. Every citizen of the Union has the rights provided for in the Treaty. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty became legally binding across the Union, reflects the fundamental rights and freedoms to which persons are entitled in the Union. Those rights should be promoted and respected if they are to become a reality. The full enjoyment of those rights should be guaranteed and any obstacles should be dismantled.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) VAll forms of violence against women in all its forms constitutes a serious violation of fundamental rights and a serious health scourge. Such violence is present throughout the Union and coordinated action is necessary in order to address it. Taking action to combat violence against women contributes to the promotion of. This scourge has serious repercussions, and not just on victims’ physical and mental health, but also on society as a whole because inequality between men and women is expressed here in its cruellest and most distressing form. Violence against women is present throughout the Union. Combating it requires a strong political will and coordinated action in all the Member States and should be tackled through the more global approach of an EU policy to promote the empowerment of women and equality between women and men.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The Treaty requires the Union to promote the protection of the rights of the child pursuant to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union, while combating discrimination. Children are vulnerable, in particular in a situation of poverty, social exclusion, disability or specific situations putting them at risk. Action should be taken to promote the rights of the child and contribute to the protection of children from harm and violence, which pose a danger to their physical or mental health. Special attention should be paid to the situation of young girls and their living conditions as they are particularly vulnerable.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The Communication from the Commission on Europe 2020 sets out a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Supporting and promoting the rights of persons within the Union, promoting equality between men and women and the empowerment of women, tackling discrimination and inequalities and promoting citizenship contribute to the promotion of the specific objectives and flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 Strategy.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 65 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) to promote equality between men and women and the empowerment of women;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 68 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to enhance the respect of the rights of the childsure that the rights of the child are respected, keeping in mind that young girls are particularly vulnerable;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 74 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The indicators and quantitative data used to assess achievement of the objectives of this Regulation shall be broken down by gender.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) enhancing public awareness and knowledge of Union law and policies, with a view in particular to strengthening citizens’ knowledge of their rights and empowering them to act thereupon, notably as regards equality between men and women and non-discrimination;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 81 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) Aanalytical activities, such as collection of data and statistics; development of common methodologies and, where appropriate, indicators or benchmarks, with data and information broken down by gender; studies, researches, analyses and surveys; evaluations and impact assessments; elaboration and publication of guides, reports and educational material; monitoring and assessment of the transposition and application of Union legislation and of the implementation of Union policies; workshops, seminars, experts meetings, conferences, which shall include a global, cross-cutting gender approach;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 83 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) Training activities, such as staff exchanges, workshops, seminars, train-the- trainers events, development of online/other training modules, taking care to ensure that these include a global, cross-cutting gender dimension providing training in equality between men and women and in non-discrimination; care shall also be taken to ensure that the training and skills-building activities help empower women through training courses, workshops, seminars, information sessions, training modules and other specific informative methods all aimed at women;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 89 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Mutual learning, cooperation, awareness raising and dissemination activities, such as identification of, and exchanges on, good practices, innovative approaches and experiences, organisation of peer review and mutual learning; organisation of conferences and seminars; organisation of awareness-raising and information campaigns, media campaigns and events, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the European Union; compilation and publication of materials to disseminate information as well as results of the Programme; development, operation and maintenance of systems and tools using information and communication technologies. Care should be taken to ensure that these activities include a global, cross-cutting gender approach which focuses on promoting equality between men and women, non- discrimination and the empowerment of women;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 105 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Care shall be taken to include a global, cross-cutting gender approach in the interim evaluation report and the ex- post evaluation report and to base the evaluation’s conclusions on indicators and data that are broken down by gender and gender specific.
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 339 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44
Article 44 Suspension of payments in case of late submission When sectoral agricultural legislation requires Member States to submit, within a specific period of time, information on the numbers of checks carried out and their outcome and the Member States overrun that period, the Commission may suspend the monthly payments referred to in Article 18 or the interim payments referred to in Article 35 for which the relevant statistical information has not been sent in time.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 165 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Agri-environment-climate payments should continue to play a prominent role in supporting the sustainable development of rural areas and in responding to society's increasing demands for environmental services. They should further encourage farmers and other land managers to serve society as a whole by introducing or continuing to apply agricultural practices contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and compatible with the protection and improvement of the environment, the landscape and its features, natural resources, the soil and genetic diversity. In this context the conservation of genetic resources in agriculture and the additional needs of farming systems that are of high nature value should be given specific attention. Payments should contribute to covering additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitments undertaken and should only cover commitments going beyond relevant mandatory standards and requirements, in accordance with the "polluter pays" principle. In many situations the synergies resulting from commitments undertaken jointly by a group of farmers multiply the environmental and climate benefit. However, joint action brings additional transaction costs which should be compensated adequately. In order to ensure that farmers and other land managers are in a position to correctly implement the commitments they have undertaken, Member States should endeavour to provide them with the required skills and knowledge. Member States should maintain the level of efforts made during the 2007-2013 programming period and have tomay spend a minimum of 25% of the total contribution from the EAFRD to each rural development programme for climate change mitigation and adaptation and land management, through the agri- environment-climate, organic farming and payments to areas facing natural or other specific constraints measures.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 248 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new)
(u a) "woman farmer" means a natural female person who exercises an "agricultural activity" within the definition under Regulation (EU) No DP/2012
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 277 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The EAFRD shall contribute to the Europe 2020 Strategy by promoting sustainable rural development throughout the Union in a complementary manner to the other instruments of the common agricultural policy (hereinafter ‘CAP’), to cohesion policy and to the common fisheries policy. It shall contribute to a more territorially and environmentally balanced, climate- friendly and resilient and innovative Union agricultural and forestry sector.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 278 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The EAFRD shall contribute to the Europe 2020 Strategy by promoting sustainable rural development throughout the Union in a complementary manner to the other instruments of the common agricultural policy (hereinafter “CAP”), to cohesion policy and to the common fisheries policy. It shall contribute to a more territorially and environmentally balanced, climate- friendly and resilient and, innovative and competitive Union agricultural and forestry sector.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 285 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) the competitiveness of agriculture and forestry;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 326 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
(2) enhancing competitiveness of all types of agriculture and forestry and enhancing farm viability, with a focus on the following areas:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 395 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
c) improving soil management; erosion, artificial fertilisers and pesticides.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 436 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – introductory part
(6) promoting social inclusion, good conditions for women farmers, poverty reduction and economic development in rural areas, with a focus on the following areas:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 441 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point а
а) facilitating diversification, creation and development of new small enterprises and job creation;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 449 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c a (new)
cа) encouraging the involvement of women in the agriculture sector and the development of their role in that sector.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 532 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States which do not grant an annual payment to young farmers under Chapter 4 of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 shall include a thematic sub- programme for young farmers.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 549 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The support rates laid down in Annex I may be increased by 10 percentage points for operations supported in the framework of thematic sub-programmes concerning women farmers, small farms and short supply chains. In the case of young farmers and mountain areas, the maximum support rates may be increased in accordance with Annex I. However, the maximum combined support rate shall not exceed 90%.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 646 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Support may also cover short-term farm and forest management exchange and farms well as farm and forest visit.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 651 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Support under this measure shall be in the form of a voucher for the benefit of persons engaged in the agricultural, food and forestry sector, land managers and other economic actors which are SMEs directly linked to the agricultural or forestry sector and operating in rural areas.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 660 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The training or other knowledge transfer and information action provider shall be the beneficiary of the support.deleted
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 669 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Eligible costs under this measure shall beMember States should ensure that the voucher system enables providers to cover the costs of organising and delivering the knowledge transfer or information action. In the case of demonstration projects, support may also cover relevant investment costs. Costs for travel, accommodation and per diem expenses of participants as well as the cost of replacement of farmers and forest holders shall also be eligiblecovered.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 679 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 90 concerning the further specification of eligible costs, the minimum qualifications of bodies providing knowledge transfer services and the duration and content of farm exchange schemes and farm and forest visits.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 690 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) help farmers, forest holders and SMEs in rural areas benefit from the use of advisory services for the improvement of the economic and environmental performance, processing and marketing of their produce, as well as the climate friendliness and resilience of their holding, enterprise and/or investment;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 699 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) to support young farmers setting-up.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 704 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The beneficiary of support provided in paragraph 1(a) and (c) shall be in the provider ofform of a voucher granted to the farmers which may be exchanged for advice or training. Support under paragraph 1(b) shall be granted to the authority or body selected to set up the farm management, farm relief, farm advisory or forestry advisory service.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 706 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The authorities or bodies selected to provide advice shall have the appropriate resources in the form of regularly trained and qualified staff and advisory experience and reliability with respect to the fields they advise in. The beneficiaries shall be chosen through calls for proposals. The selection procedure shall be objective and be open to public as well as to cooperative and private bodies.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 755 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support under this measure shall cover new participation by farmersindividual farmers and producer groups or producer organizations recognised pursuant to Article 106 of Single CMO Regulation in:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 788 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Support shall be granted as an annual incentive payment, the level of which shall be determined according to the level of the fixed costs arising from participation in supported schemes, for a maximum duration of fiseven years.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 821 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) improve the overall performance of the agricultural holding and of cooperatives/OPs recognised pursuant to art. 106 of Single CMO Regulation;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 841 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) concern infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture and forestry, including access to farm and forest land, land consolidation and improvement, energy supply and, water management, including collective land and water management systems; or
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 845 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
вc) concern infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture or forestry, including access to farm and forest land, land consolidation and improvement, energy supply and, water management; or
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 864 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Support under paragraph 1(a) shall be granted to agricultural holdings. In the case of investments to support farm restructuring, only farms not exceeding a certain size, to be defined by the Member States in the programme based on the SWOT analysis carried out in relation to the Union priority for rural development ‘enhancing competitiveness of all types of agriculture and enhancing farm viability’, shall be eligible.deleted
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 916 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) business and cooperatives/OPs recognised pursuant to art. 106 of Single CMO Regulation start-up aid for:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 933 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) investments in non-agricultural activities which provide economic benefits for the agricultural sector;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 951 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) early retirement payments for farmers who decide to stop their agricultural activity for the purpose of transferring the holdings to a young farmer.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 964 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Support under paragraph 1(a)(i) shall be granted to young farmers and may take the form of access to capital at preferential rates.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 977 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Support under paragraph 1(a)(ii) shall be granted to farmers or members of the farm household and agricultural SME diversifying into non- agricultural activities and to non- agricultural micro- and small- enterprises in rural areas. Support under paragraph 1(a)(ii) shall be granted to SMEs, cooperatives, POs recognised pursuant to art. 106 of Single CMO Regulation, to farmers or members of the farm household diversifying into non-agricultural activities in rural areas.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1032 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point а
а) the drawing up and updating of plans for the development of municipalities and villages in rural areas and their basic services and of protection and management plans relating to NATURA 2000 sites and other areas of high nature value;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1079 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. Investments under paragraph 1 shall be eligible for support where the relevant operations are implemented in accordance with plans for the development of municipalities in rural areas and of villages, and their basic services, where such plans exist, and shall be consistent with any local development strategy where one exists.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1090 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) in high and middle-high risk areas the inclusion of preventive equipments against forest fires is a precondition for any other financial aid under the Structural Funds. In this respect, Member States must set aside a co-financing dedicated to preventive equipments in the mentioned areas.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1099 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point e а (new)
(eа) consolidation of forests, regardless of their type of ownership.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1100 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) investments in improved wood mobilisation techniques.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1107 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For holdings above a certain size, to be determined by the Member States in the programme, support shall be conditional on the submission of a forest management plan or equivalent instrument in line with sustainable forest management as defined by the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe of 199334 (hereinafter ‘sustainable forest management’).
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1118 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(a) shall be granted to private land-owners and tenants, municipalities and their associations, and to public landowners who do not receive assistance under the national budget for the activity in question, and shall cover the costs of establishment and an annual premium per hectare to cover the costs of maintenance, including early and late cleanings, for a maximum period of tfifteen years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1153 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(b) shall be granted to private land-owners, and tenants, municipalities and their associations, and to public landowners who do not receive assistance under the national budget for the activity in question, and shall cover the costs of establishment and improvement and an annual premium per hectare to cover the costs of maintenance, including early and late cleanings, for a maximum period of three years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1159 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. "Agro-forestry systems" shall mean land use systems in which trees are grown in combination with extensive agriculture on the same land. The maximum number of trees to be planted per hectare shall be determined by the Member States taking account of local pedo-climatic conditions, forestry species and the need to ensure agricultural use of the land.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1169 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support under Article 22(1)(c) shall be granted to private, semi -public and public forest owners who do not receive assistance under the national budget for the activity in question, other land managers, municipalities, state forests and their associations, and shall cover the costs for:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1174 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) Member States implementing preventive equipments and measures in the framework of a state and institutionalized "Prevention Plan against forest fires" organised at a regional scale may receive financial support under article 22 §1. The Prevention Plan must be state-monitored and must cover the whole national territory with special provisions in high-risk regions;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1176 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) local, small scale prevention activities against fire or other natural hazards, provided that they are eligible and therefore integrated in the Prevention Plan;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1181 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) establishing and improving forest fire risks, pest and diseases forecasting and monitoring facilities and communication equipments in forested areas;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1185 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) prevention and repairs of damages caused by wildlife.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1194 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Eligible operations shall be consistent with the forest protection plan established by the Member States. For holdings above a certain size, to be determined by the Member States in the programme, support shall be conditional on the submission of a forest management plan detailing the preventive objectives.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1205 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. Support under paragraph 1(d) shall be subject to the formal recognition by the competent public authorities of Member States that a natural disaster has occurred and that this disaster, or measures adopted in accordance with Directive 2000/29/EC to eradicate or contain a plant disease or pest has caused the destruction of at least 30% of the relevant forest potential defined by the Member State. This percentage shall be determined on the basis of either the average existing forest potential in the three-year period immediately preceding the disaster or on the average of the five- year period immediately preceding the disaster, excluding the highest and the lowest entry.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1321 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. Commitments under this measure shall be undertaken for a period of five to seven years. However, where necessary in order to achieve or maintain the environmental benefits sought, Member States may determine a longer period in their rural development programmes for particular types of commitments, including by means of providing for their annual extension after the termination of the initial period. For specific sub-measures and strands, provision shall be made for Member States to undertake commitments under this measure for periods of less than five years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1360 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall endeavour to provide farmers undertaking commitments under this measure with the knowledge and information required to implement them.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1374 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Support shall be granted to farmers and to private forest owners and associations of farmers and private forest owners respectively. In duly justified cases it may also be granted to other land managers.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1474 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Support under this measure shall be granted per hectare of forest to forest holders, public owners, municipalities and their associations who undertake, on a voluntary basis, to carry out operations consisting of one or more forest-environment commitments. Bodies managing state owned forests may also benefit from support provided they are independent from the state budget.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1479 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For forest holdings above a certain threshold to be determined by Member States in their rural development programmes, support under paragraph 1 shall be conditional on the submission of a forest management plan or equivalent instrument in line with sustainable forest management.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1485 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support under this measure shall promotebe granted for the promotion of forms of co-operation involving at least two entities and in particular:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1486 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support under this measure shall promote forms of co-operation involving at least two entities, including primary producers, and in particular:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1488 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) co-operation approaches among different actors in the Union agriculture and food chain, forestry sector and among other actors that contribute to achieving the objectives and priorities of rural development policy, including inter-branch organisationsproducer groups, POs, APOs and inter-branch organisations, which should have eligibility and higher priority in funding;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1532 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) implementation, in particular by public- and private partnerships other than those defined in Article 28(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No [CSF/2012], of local development strategies addressing one or more of the Union priorities for rural development;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1612 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall define the rules for the constitution and management of the mutual funds, in particular for the granting of compensation payments to farmers in the event of crisis and for the administration and monitoring of compliance with these rules. Member States may decide to supplement the mutual funds with insurance schemes and insurance cooperation, including through credit cooperatives.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1743 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
At the initiative of the Member States up to 4% of the total amount of each rural development programme may be devoted to the tasks referred to in Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No [CSF/2012], as well as costs related to preparatory work for the delimitation of areas facing natural and other specific constraints referred to in Article 33(3).
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1779 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – point d
d) foster innovation in agriculture and forestry.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1792 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – point c
c) the setting up of a pre-selection board of independent experts and the process of pre-selection of applications for the prize for innovative local co-operation referred to in Article 58(2).deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1795 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56
Article 56 Prize for innovative, local cooperation in rural areas The funds referred to in Article 51(2) shall be used for financing the award of a prize to cooperation projects involving at least two entities located in different Member States that realise an innovative, local concept.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1804 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57
Article 57 Call for proposals 1. Starting at the latest in 2015 and every year thereafter the Commission shall launch a call for proposals in view of awarding the prize referred to in Article 56. The last call for proposals shall be launched no later than in 2019. 2. The call for proposals shall indicate a theme for the proposals which shall be related to one of the Union priorities for rural development. The theme shall also be appropriate for implementation through cooperation at transnational level. 3. The call for proposals shall be open to both local action groups and individual entities cooperating for the purpose of the specific project.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1814 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58
Article 58 Selection procedure 1. Applications for the prize shall be submitted by applicants in all Member States to the respective national rural network, which will be responsible for pre-selecting applications. 2. National rural networks shall set up, from within their members, a pre- selection board of independent experts in order to pre-select applications. Pre- selection of applications shall be done on the basis of the exclusion, selection and award criteria defined in the call for proposals. Each National Rural Network shall pre-select no more than 10 applications and shall transmit them to the Commission. 3. The Commission shall be responsible for the selection of fifty winning projects among the applications pre-selected in all the Member States. The Commission shall set up an ad hoc steering group composed of independent experts. This steering group shall prepare the selection of the winning applications on the basis of the exclusion, selection and award criteria defined in the call for proposals. 4. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, decide on the list of projects to which the prize is awarded.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1822 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59
Article 59 Financial Prize – conditions and payment 1. In order for projects to be eligible for the prize, the time required for their completion shall not exceed two years from the date of adoption of the implementing act awarding the prize. The time frame of realisation of the project shall be defined in the application. 2. The prize shall be granted in the form of a lump sum payment. The amount of the payment shall be determined by the Commission, by means of implementing acts, in line with criteria defined in the call for proposals and taking into account the estimated cost of realisation of the project indicated in the application. The maximum prize per project shall not exceed 100 000 euro. 3. Member States shall pay the award to winning applicants after verifying that the project has been completed. The relevant expenditure shall be reimbursed by the Union to Member States in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of Chapter II of Title IV of Regulation (EU) No HR/2012. Member States may decide to pay fully or partly the sum of the prize to the winning applicants before having verified the completion of the project but they shall, in this case, bear the responsibility for the expenditure until the completion of the project is verified.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1833 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60
Article 60 Rules on the procedure, timetables and setting up of the steering-group The Commission shall by means of implementing acts lay down detailed provisions on the procedure and timetables for the selection of projects and rules on the setting up of the steering group of independent experts referred to in Article 58(3). These implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 91.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1843 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 4
EIP for agricultural and forestry productivity and sustainability
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1846 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The EIP for agricultural and forestry productivity and sustainability shall:
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1851 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promote a resource efficient, productive, low emission, climate friendly and resilient agricultural and forestry sector, working in harmony with the essential natural resources on which farming and forestry depends;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1865 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) build bridges between cutting-edge research knowledge and technology and farmers, forest managers, businesses and advisory services.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1868 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) encourage the development of pilot- projects;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1869 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(d b) support young farmers setting-up.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1870 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The EIP for agricultural and forestry productivity and sustainability shall seek to achieve its aims by:
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1881 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 3
3. The EAFRD shall contribute to the aims of the EIP for agricultural and forestry productivity and sustainability through support, in accordance with Article 36, of the EIP operational groups referred to in Article 62 and the EIP Network referred to in Article 53.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1890 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1
1. EIP operational groups shall form part of the EIP for agricultural productivity and sustainability. They shall be set up by interested actors such as farmers, forest owners, researchers, advisors and businesses involved in the agriculture and food sector.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1935 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point а а (new)
aа) 75% of the eligible public expenditure for all regions with a per capita GDP for the period 2007-2013 of less than 75% of the average for the EU-25 for the reference period, but with a per capita GDP of over 75% of the average GDP for the EU-27;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1937 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point а b (new)
аb) 60% of the eligible public expenditure for transition regions, other than the regions referred to above;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1945 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 4 – point а
а) 8075% for the measures referred to in Articles 15, 28 and 36, for the LEADER local development referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No [CSF/2012] and for operations under Article 20(1)(a)(i). It may be increased to 90% for the programmes of less developed, the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean islands within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1963 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 4 – point b
б) 100% for operations receiving funding under Article 66.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1990 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66
Article 66 Funding for operations with a significant contribution to innovation The funds transferred to the EAFRD in application of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 shall be reserved for operations which provide a significant contribution to innovation relevant to agricultural productivity and sustainability, including climate mitigation or adaptation.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 473 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Beekeeping is characterised by the diversity of production conditions and yields and the dispersion and variety of economic operators, both at the production and marketing stages. Moreover, in view of the spread of varroasis in several Member States in recent years and the problems which that disease causes to honey production, coordinated action by the Union as part of European veterinary policy continues to be necessary as varroasis cannot be completely eradicated and is to be treated with approved products. Given such circumstances and in order to improve bee health and the production and marketing of apiculture products in the Union, national programmes for the sector should be drawn up every three years with a view to improving the general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products. Those national programmes should be partly financed by the Union.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 502 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 84 a (new)
(84 a) In order to take into account the specificities of the sugar sector, the Commission shall ensure a fair balance of rights and obligations between the producers in the EU sugar sector such as to provide all stakeholders with equitable access conditions to raw materials.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 510 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 85 a (new)
(85a) Data collected by the Farm Accountancy Data Network should be taken into consideration when formulating studies and research with the aim of preventing crises in the various agricultural sectors, given that they reflect the performance of farms. These data should be a useful tool for crisis prevention and management.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 674 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) butter and skimmed milk powder, from 1 March to 31 August throughout the year.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 771 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(c b) tobacco;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 791 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e d (new)
(e d) poultrymeat;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 994 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29a (new)
Article 29а Aid to producer groups 1. During the transitional period allowed pursuant to Article 110 (new), Member States may grant to producer groups in the fruit and vegetables sector which have been formed in view of being recognised as a producer organisation: а) aid to encourage their formation and facilitate their administrative operation; b) aid, provided either directly or through credit institutions, to cover part of the investments required to attain recognition and set out in the recognition plan referred to in Article 110(1) (new). 2. The aid referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reimbursed by the Community in accordance with rules to be adopted by the Commission on the financing of such measures, including the thresholds and ceilings and the degree of Community financing. 3. The aid referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be determined for each producer group on the basis of its marketed production and shall amount, for the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years, to: а) 10%, 10%, 8%, 6% and 4% respectively of the value of marketed production. Those percentage rates may be reduced in relation to the value of marketed production which exceeds a threshold. A ceiling may be applied to the aid payable in any given year to a producer group.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1018 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) environmental measures and methods of production, manufacture and processing respecting the environment, including organic farming and integrated production;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1095 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall be responsible for support programmes and ensure that they are internally consistent and drawn up and implemented in an objective manner, taking into account the economic situation of the producers concerned and the need to avoid unjustified unequal treatment between producers. Member States shall be responsible for providing for and carrying out the necessary controls and penalties in case of non-compliance with the support programmes.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1113 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – title
Promotion in third-countries
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1118 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. Support under this Article shall cover information or promotion measures concerning Union wines on the internal market or in third countries, thereby improving their competitiveness in those countries.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1137 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. Support for the setting up of mutual funds shall provide assistance to producers seeking to insure themselves against market fluctuations.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1148 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) 80 % of the cost of the insurance premiums paid for by producers or producer organisations/ cooperatives for insurance against losses resulting from adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to natural disasters;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1151 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
(b) 50 % of the cost of the insurance premiums paid for by producers or producer organisations/ cooperatives for insurance against:
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1199 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may draw up national programmes for the apiculture sector covering a period of three years. These programmes have to be developed in close cooperation with representative organisations and cooperatives in the beekeeping field.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1204 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 2
2. The Union contribution to the apiculture programmes shall not exceedbe equivalent to 50 % of the expenditure borne by Member States.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1209 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3
3. To be eligible for the Union contribution provided for in paragraph 2, Member States shall carry out a study of the production and marketing structure in the beekeeping sector in their territory.establish a reliable system of identification which makes it possible to perform regular censuses of bee populations and shall carry out a study of the production and marketing structure in the beekeeping sector in their territory. The financing of the census and of hive identification must not be cut from existing programmes to improve production and marketing of honey under Regulation (EC) No 797/20041. _______________ 1 OJ L 125, 28.4.2004
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1211 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 а (new)
3a. The national apiculture programmes shall be drawn up in close collaboration with the representative organisations and beekeeping cooperatives.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1215 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. The measures which may be included in apiculture programmes shall be the following: а) technical assistance to beekeepers and beekeepers’ organisations; b) control of varroosis; c) rationalisation of transhumance; d) measures to support laboratories carrying out analyses of the physico- chemical properties of honey; e) measures to support the restocking of hives in the Community; f) cooperation with specialised bodies for the implementation of applied research programmes in the field of beekeeping and apiculture products.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1486 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 101 q (new)
Article 101 q Implementing powers 1 a. In order to take into account the specificities of the full time cane sugar refining sector, the power to adopt certain implementing acts in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty should be conferred on the Commission in respect of establishing a list of full-time refiners.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1603 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) are constituted and controlled by producers in any of the sectors listed in Article 1(2);
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1609 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) dispose of adequate human, material or technical resources for carrying out their activities;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1629 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v a (new)
(va) promoting and providing technical assistance for the use of production standards, improving product quality and developing products with a protected designation of origin, a protected geographical indication or covered by a national quality label;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1674 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 a (new)
Article 106a Recognition of producer organisations 1. Member States shall recognise as producer organisations all legal entities or clearly defined parts of legal entities applying for such recognition, provided that they: а) meet the requirements laid down in points (b) and (c) of the first paragraph of Article 106; b) meet the minimum thresholds laid down by the Member State concerned for the number of members and/or the value of marketed production in the area in which they operate; c) provide sufficient evidence that they can carry out their activities properly, both over time and in terms of effectiveness, provision of human, material and technical support to their members, and concentration of supply; d) have rules of association that are consistent with points (a), (b) and (c) of this paragraph. 2. Member States may decide that producer organisations which have been recognised before 1 January 2014 on the basis of national law, and which fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article, are deemed to be recognised as producer organisations pursuant to Article 106. 3. Member States may decide that producer organisations which have been recognised before 1 January 2014 on the basis of national law and which do not fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article may continue to exercise their activities under national law until 1 January 2015. 4. Member States shall: а) decide whether to grant recognition to a producer organisation within four months of the lodging of an application accompanied by all the relevant supporting evidence; this application shall be lodged with the Member State where the organisation has its headquarters; b) carry out, at intervals to be determined by them, checks to verify that recognised producer organisations are complying with the provisions in this Chapter; c) in the event of non-compliance or irregularities in the implementation of the measures provided for in this Chapter, impose on those organisations and associations the applicable penalties they have laid down and decide whether, if necessary, recognition should be withdrawn; d) inform the Commission once a year and no later than 31 March of every decision to grant, refuse or withdraw recognition taken during the previous calendar year.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1782 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 109 a (new)
Article 109a Producer groups in the fruit and vegetables sector 1. In Member States with a low level of producer organisation, producer groups may be formed as a legal entity or clearly defined part of a legal entity, on the initiative of farmers who are growers of one or more products of the fruit and vegetables sector and/or of such products solely intended for processing, with a view to being recognised as a producer organisation. Such producer groups may be allowed a transitional period in which to meet the conditions for recognition as a producer organisation in accordance with Article 106. In order to qualify, those producer groups shall present a phased recognition plan to the relevant Member State, acceptance of which shall signal the start of the transitional period referred to in the second subparagraph and shall constitute a preliminary recognition. The transitional period shall be no more than five years long. 2. Before acceptance of the recognition plan, Member States shall inform the Commission of their intentions and the likely financial implications thereof.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1838 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 112 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Taking into account the need to encourage action by the organisations referred to in Articles 106 to 108 to facilitate the adjustment of supply to market requirements, with the exception of action relating to withdrawal from the market, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160, concerning the live plants, beef and veal, pigmeat, sheepmeat and goatmeat, eggs and poultrymeat sectors on measures:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1924 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 130 a (new)
Article 130 a Special import provisions for cane sugar for refining A European Supply Need of cane sugar for refining shall be fixed for the Community at 3.500.000 tonnes per marketing year. 1. In addition to the provision of Article 117, with regards to cane sugar for refining, import licences for cane sugar for refining shall only be issued to full- time refiners provided that the quantities concerned do not exceed the European Supply Need amount referred to in paragraph 1. 2. These import licences granted under paragraph 2 may only be transferred between full-time refiners and their validity shall expire at the end of the marketing year for which they have been issued. 3. The Commission shall suspend the application of import duties on cane sugar for refining falling within CN Code 1701 14 10 with respect to the complementary quantity which is needed to allow an adequate supply to the full-time refiners for each of the marketing years. 4. This complementary quantity shall be fixed by the Commission based on the shortfall between the European supply need referred to in paragraph 1 and the forecast supply of cane sugar for refining for the marketing year concerned. The Commission shall make a forecast at the beginning of each marketing year. The forecast will be updated on the basis of the amount of cane sugar for refining expected to be supplied during that marketing year, including any complementary quantity already issued with respect to that marketing year. 5. The update will be made in advance of the allocation of a complementary quantity and the subsequent issuance of import licenses. A significant share of the import licences for the complementary quantity, up to 70%, shall be issued each marketing year no later than the end of November. Import licences for half of the remaining complementary quantity shall be issued no later than end of February and the rest of the import licences shall be issued no later than the end of May. 6. Import licences for any remaining complementary quantity shall be allocated by 30 September of each marketing year. The import licenses for this complementary quantity granted under this paragraph shall be valid for the first three months of the following marketing year. 7. The ESN referred to in paragraph 1 may be reduced, together and in parallel with beet and isoglucose quotas, by the Commission in any marketing year when the Commission forecast that total sugar and isoglucose supply significantly exceeds demand. The reduction would be through a common percentage applied to the ESN as well as beet and isoglucose quotas.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1934 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 130 c (new)
Article 130 c (new) 1. By 1 January 2014, the Commission will propose, by means of an implementing act, a revised Common Customs Tariff for the products falling within CN code 1701. The new tariffs for raw and white sugar shall not be higher than 50% of the reference price for the respective products. 2. By 31 September 2015, the Commission will present an analysis of the impact on the competitiveness of the EU food chain, including consumers, of the complete elimination of import tariffs for the products mentioned in the first paragraph of this Article.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2080 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 155 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(f a) potatoes; (f b) cereals; (f c) oilseeds; (f d) protein crops;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2090 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 155 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Union shall provide part-financing equivalent to 580 % of the expenditure borne by Member States for the measures provided for in paragraph 1.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2182 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part I a (new)
Part I a: Definitions concerning the sugar sector 'Full-time refiner' means a production unit: (a) of which the sole activity is refining imported raw cane sugar; and (b) in respect of sugar, which does not combine refining imported raw cane sugar with any other activity. A production unit which refined a quantity of at least 15,000 tonnes of imported raw cane sugar for refining in the marketing year 2004/2005 shall also qualify as a full-time refiner.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2192 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part VIII – point 2 a (new)
2a. Definitions of hive products - Royal jelly: Natural substance secreted by the hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands of nurse bees (Apis mellifera). Mainly used to feed larvae and queens, it is a fresh, natural and unprocessed product. It may be filtered (without ultrafiltration), although no substance is added. - Pollen pellets: Accumulated pollen grains harvested by worker bees of the species Apis mellifera, which is compacted on their hind legs with the help of honey and/or nectar and bees' secretion. The protein source for the colony, the product is natural, free from additives and harvested at the entrance to the hive. - Bee pollen or bee bread: Pollen pellets packed into honeycomb cells by bees and which undergo natural processing leading to the presence of enzymes and commensal microbiota. It is used by nurse bees to feed the brood. It may not contain any additives except wax from the honeycomb cells. - Beeswax: Substance constituted solely from secretion of the wax glands of worker bees of the species Apis mellifera and used in the construction of honeycombs. - Propolis: Resin of exclusively natural and plant origin, harvested by worker bees of the species Apis mellifera from certain plant sources, to which their own secretion is added (primarily wax and salivary secretion) in order to be used as protection for the hive. - Bee venom: Secretion from the bee's venom gland used by bees to defend against hive attackers.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 112 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ‘The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’11 sets out potential challenges, objectives and orientations for the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2013. In the light of the debate on that Communication, the CAP should be reformed with effect from 1 January 2014. That reform should cover all the main instruments of the CAP, including Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003. In view of the scope of the reform, it is appropriate to repeal Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and to replace it with a new text. The reform should also, as far as possible,The reform should streamline and simplify provisions.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 136 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In order to take into account specific new elements and to guarantee the protection of the rights of beneficiaries, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of laying down further definitions regarding the access to support under this Regulation, establishing the framework within which Member States shall define the minimum activities to be carried out on areas naturally kept in a state suitable for grazing or cultivation as well as the criteria to be met by farmers in order to be deemed to have respected the obligation of maintaining the agricultural area in the state suitable for production and the criteria to determine the predominance of grasses and other herbaceous forage as regards permanent grassland and pasture and permanent crops.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 138 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) With a view to ensuring that the amounts for the financing of the CAP comply with the annual ceilings referred to in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) No […] [HZR], an adjustment of the level of direct support in any calendar year should be maintained. The adjustment of the direct payments should only be applied to payments to be granted to farmers in excess of EUR 5 000 in the corresponding calendar year. Taking into account the levels of direct payments for farmers in Bulgaria and Romania in the framework of the application of the phasing-in mechanism to all direct payments granted in those Member States, this instrument of financial discipline should only apply in those Member States as from 1 January 2016.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 147 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To avoid an excessive administrative burden caused by the managing of payments of small amounts, Member States should in general refrain from granting direct payments where the payment would be lower than EUR 100 or the eligible area of the holding for which support is claimed would be less than one hectare. However, as the structures of the Member States' agricultural economies vary considerably and may differ significantly from the average farm structure in the Union, Member States should be allowed to apply minimum thresholds that reflect their particular situation. Due to the very specific farming structure in the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean Islands, Member States should be able to decide whether any minimum threshold should apply in those regions. Moreover, Member States should have the possibility to opt for the implementation of one of the two types of minimum threshold taking account of the particularities of the structures of their farming sectors. As payment could be granted to farmers with so-called ‘landless’ holdings, the application of the hectare- based threshold would be ineffective. The support-related minimum amount should therefore apply to such farmers. To ensure equal treatment of farmers whose direct payments are subject to phasing-in in Bulgaria and Romania, the minimum threshold should be based on the final amounts to be granted at the end of the phasing-in process.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 162 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The distribution of direct income support among farmers is characterised by the allocation of disproportionate amounts of payments to a rather small number of large beneficiaries. Due to economies of size, larger beneficiaries do not require the same level of unitary support for the objective of income support to be efficiently achieved. Moreover, the potential to adapt makes it easier for larger beneficiaries to operate with lower levels of unitary support. It is therefore fair to introduce a system for large beneficiaries where the support level is gradually reduced and ultimately capped to improve the distribution of payments between farmers. Such system should however take into account salaried labour intensity to avoid disproportionate effects on large farms with high employment numbers. Those maximum levels should not apply to payments granted to agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment since the beneficial objectives they pursue could be diminished as a result. In order to make capping effective, Member States should establish some criteria in order to avoid abusive operations by farmers seeking to evade its effects. The proceeds of the reduction and capping of payments to large beneficiaries should remain in the Member States where they were generated and should be used for financing projects with a significant contribution to innovation under Regulation (EU) No […] of the European Parliament and of the Council of….on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Devefor intensive sectors, livestock production and, where alternative funding is not available, sectors eligible for production-related subsidies to secure emplopyment (EAFRD) [RDR].
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 175 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) In order to evaluate the new CAP, a review of the reforms and their impact on the environment and agricultural production should be carried out by the Commission by the end of 2017.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 176 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Farmers in Member States which acceded to the European Union on or after 1 May 2004 received direct payments following a phasing-in mechanism provided for in the respective Acts of Accession. For Bulgaria and Romania, such mechanism will be still in force in 2014 and 2015. Furthermore, those Member States were allowed to grant complementary nshould be reviewed in 2014 and 2015 with a view to achieving a fair allocational of direct payments. The possibility for granting such payments should be maintained for Bulgaria and Romania until they are fully phased-in among the various Member States.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 211 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 b (new)
(21b) Member States using the single area payments scheme (SAPS) may retain this system, subject to modifications to accommodate the new basic payment scheme and conditions laid out in Chapter 2 of this Regulation.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 214 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 c (new)
(21c) Member States which, by 31 December 2013, operate the single payment scheme on a regional or regional hybrid basis, may retain their existing payment entitlements, subject to modifications to accommodate the conditions laid out in Chapter 2 of this Regulation.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 239 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) One of the objectives of the new CAP is the enhancement of environmental performance through a mandatory "greening" component of direct payments which will support agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment applicable throughout the Union. For that purpose, Member States should use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant an annual payment, on top of the basic payment, for compulsory practices to be followed by farmers addressing, as a priority, both climate and environment policy goals. Those practisces should take the form of simple, generalised, non- contractual and annual actions that go beyond cross- compliance and are linked to agriculture such as crop diversification, maintenance of permanent grassland and ecological focus areas. The compulsory nature of those practisces should also concern farmers whose holdings are fully or partly situated in "'Natura 2000"' areas covered by Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora and by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, as long as these practisces are compatible with the objectives of those Directives. Farmers who fulfil the conditions laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, should benefit from the "greening" component without fulfilling any further obligation, given the recognised environmental benefits of the organic farming systems. Non-respect of the "greening" component should lead to penalties on the basis of Article 65 of Regulation (EU) No […] [HZR].
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 264 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 а (new)
(29a) In order to promote biodiversity, protection of the environment and agricultural productivity, a special scheme shall be introduced for sectors making an active contribution in that regard. The beekeeping sector should be accorded priority and there should be provision for direct support for bee colonies kept by registered producers. The necessity of funding for pollination must be taken into account.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 274 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The creation and development of new economic activityIn order to address the challenge of inter-generational renewal in the agriculturale sector by young farmers is financially challenging and constitutes an element that should be considered in the allocation and targeting of direct payments. This development is essential for the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the Union and, for that reason, where only 7% of the population is aged under 35 years of age, an income support to young farmers commencing their agricultural activities should be established in order to facilitate the initial establishment of young farmers and the structural adjustment of their holdings after the initial setting up. Member States should be able to use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant an annual area-based payment, on top of the basic payment, to young farmers. That payment should only be granted during a period of maximum five years, since it should only cover the initial period of the life of the business and should not become an operating aid.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 285 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Member States should be allowed to use part of their national ceilings for direct payments for coupled support in certain sectors in clearly defined cases. The resources that may be used for any coupled support should be limited to an appropriate level, while allowing such support to be granted in Member States or in their specific regions facing particular situations where specific types of farming or specific agricultural sectors are particularly important for economic, environmental and/or social reasons. Member States should be allowed to use up to 5 % of their national ceilings for this support, or 120 % in casef their level of coupled support in at least one of the years of the period 2010- 2013 exceeded 5 %. However, in duly justified cases where certain sensitive needs in a region are demonstrated, and upon approval by the Commission, Member States should be allowed to use more than 120 % of their national ceiling. Coupled support should only be granted to the extent necessary to create an incentive to maintain current levels of employment or production in those regions or to support sectors or types of production that offer significant advantages in terms of environmental improvement, combating climate change or biodiversity. This support should also be available to farmers holding, on 31 December 2013, special payment entitlements allocated under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and who do not have eligible hectares for the activation of payment entitlements. As regards the approval of voluntary coupled support exceeding 10 % of the annual national ceiling fixed per Member State, the Commission should further be empowered to adopt implementing acts without applying Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 332 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii а (new)
(iiia) a new EU-funded scheme of payments for bee colonies in the apiculture sector;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 340 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) a mandatory payment for young farmers who commence their agricultural activity;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 349 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
(vii) a voluntary simplified scheme for small farmers;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 398 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘agricultural area’ means any area taken up by arable land, permanent grassland and pasture or permanent crops;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 461 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) "uncultivated land": all areas that are not agriculturally managed but does not include permanent pastures, meadows or land temporarily taken out of production;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 485 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) establishing the frameworkcriteria within which Member States shall define the minimum activities to be carried out on areas naturally kept in a state suitable for grazing or cultivation;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 564 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. No dDirect payments shall be granted to natural or legal persons, or to groups of natural or legal persons, where one of the following applies:
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 565 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the annual amount of direct payments is less than 5 % of the total receipts they obtained from non-agricultural activities in the most recent fiscal year; ordeleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 582 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the annual amwho carry ount of direct payments is less than 5 % of the total receipts they obtained from non-agricultural activities in the most recent fiscal year;an agricultural activity, or maintain land in good agricultural and environmental condition, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, or
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 593 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) their agricultural areas are mainly areas naturally kept in a state suitable for grazing or cultivation and they do not carry out on those areas the minimum activity established by Member States in accordance with Article 4(1)(c).deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 614 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) whose agricultural activities form a significant part of their overall economic activities; or
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 616 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) they were not engaged in an agricultural production activity in 2011, with the exception of young farmers who have started up in 2012/2013/2014;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 624 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(b b) whose principal business or company objects consist of exercising an agricultural activity as defined in Article 4, paragraph1 (c). By way of example, entities such as transport companies, airports, real estate companies, companies managing sport grounds, campsite operators and mining companies shall be excluded from receipt of direct payments.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 648 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to farmers who received less than EUR 51 000 of direct payments for the previous year.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 672 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) exceptions from the rule that the receipts during the most recent fiscal year are to be taken into account where those figures are not available; andeleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 699 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. In Bulgaria and Romania, for the years 2014 and 2015, the amount claimed or due to be granted as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated on the basis of the amount set out in Annex V.A for the corresponding year.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 733 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– by 20 % for the tranche of more than EUR 15300 000 and up to EUR 2400 000;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 746 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– by 40 % for the tranche of more than EUR 2400 000 and up to EUR 2500 000;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 753 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
– by 70 % for the tranche of more than EUR 2500 000 and up to EUR 3600 000;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 765 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
– by 100 % for the tranche of more than EUR 3600 000.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 775 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated by subtracting the salaries effectively paid and declared by the farmer in the previous year, including taxes and social contributions related to employment, as well as costs incurred as a result of the use of contractors for specific farming operations, from the total amount of direct payments initially due to the farmer without taking into account the payments to be granted pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title III of this Regulation.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 795 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Monies unspent following application of this Article should remain in the Member State in question, under Pillar I, to be used, where alternative funding is not available, to support sectors eligible for production-related subsidies to secure employment.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 801 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 а (new)
3a. Monies unspent following application of this Article should remain in the Member State in question, under Pillar I, to be used to support intensive sectors and livestock production by means of coupled payments, supplementing the intended threshold amounts for the new Member States from the national ceilings for direct payments.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 859 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Before 1 August 2013, Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United-Kingdom may decide to make available as direct payments under this Regulation up to 510 % of the amount allocated to support for measures under rural development programming financed under the EAFRD in the period 2015-2020 as specified under Regulation (EU) No […] [RDR]. As a result, the corresponding amount shall no longer be available for support measures under rural development programming.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 870 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph -1 (new)
- 1. In order to evaluate the new CAP, a review of the implementation of the reforms and their impact on the environment and agricultural production should be carried out by the Commission by the end of 2017.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 871 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 а (new)
Article 15а Unspent monies Monies unspent following application of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 should remain in the Member State in question, under Pillar I, to be used to support intensive sectors and livestock production by means of coupled payments, supplementing the intended threshold amounts for the new Member States from the national ceilings for direct payments.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 872 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 b (new)
Article 15b Unspent monies Monies unspent following application of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 should remain in the Member State in question, under Pillar I, to be used, where alternative funding is not available, to support sectors eligible for production- related subsidies to secure employment.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 873 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16
Gradual introduction of direct payments In Bulgaria and Romania, the national ceilings for payments referred to in Articles 33, 35, 37, 39 and 51 shall in 2014 and 2015 be established on the basis of the amounts set out in point A of Annex V.Article 16 deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 889 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Payment entitlements in Member States: - obtained under the single area payment scheme in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and with Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 shall expire on(SAPS), may continue to do so after 31 December 2013; or - operating the single payment scheme on a regional or regional hybrid basis, obtained under the single payment scheme in accordance with Article 59 or Title III Chapter 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, may continue to apply these entitlements after the 31 December 2013.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1306 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to have three different crops on their arable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 320 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1426 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Farmers shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter when they fall within the following categories: – farmers complying with the requirements laid down in Article 29 (1) of Regulation (EC) No° 834/2007 as regards organic farming shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter. ; – beneficiaries of agri-environment- climate payments established pursuant to Article 29 of Regulation (EU) N° [...] [RDR]; – farmers of land cultivated with permanent crops; or – farmers of a holding at least 75 % of which consists of permanent grassland or areas in regions covered by Directive 92/43/EEC or Directive 2009/147/EC.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1521 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 320 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year, cultivation on the arable land shall consist of at least three different crops. None of those threeThe main crops shall not cover lessmore than 570 % of the arable land and the two main one shall not exceed 70crops together shall not cover more than 95 % of the arable land.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1597 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – title
Permanent grassland and pasture and permanent crops
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1608 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Farmers shall maintain as permanent grassland the areas of their holdings declared as such in the application made pursuant to Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) No XXX (HZ) for claim year 2014, hereinafter referred to as ‘reference areas under permanent grassland’Member States shall ensure that the ratio of the land under permanent grassland is maintained, within defined limits, in relation to the total agricultural area. That obligation shall apply at national or regional level.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1641 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Farmers shall be allowed to convert a maximum of 5 % of their reference areas under permanent grassland. That limit shall not apply in the case of force majeure or exceptional circumstances.deleted
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1696 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. FWhere the eligible agricultural area covers more than 20 hectares, farmers shall ensure that at least 73 % of their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25(2), excluding areas under permanent grassland, is ecological focus area such as land left fallow, terraces, landscape features like hedges or stone walls, buffer strips , land planted with nitrogen-fixing crops, afforested areas as referred to in aArticle 25(2)(b)(ii), areas wooded with nectariferous shrubs and trees or areas of intensive cultivation.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1842 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. In order to finance the payment referred to in this Chapter, Member States shall use up to 30 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1926 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Member States which do not include a thematic sub-programme for young farmers under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No [ ] [RDR] with the maximum support rates increased in accordance with annex 1 of Regulation (EU) No [ ] [RDR], shall grant an annual payment to young farmers who are entitled to a payment under the basic payment scheme referred to in Chapter 1.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1959 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) who fill the criteria for young farmers established by Member States in the second pillar;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2023 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Coupled support may be granted to the following sectors and productions: cereals, oilseeds, protein crops, grain legumes, flax, hemp, rice, nuts, starch potato, milk and milk products, seeds, sheepmeat and goatmeat, beef and veal, olive oil, silk worms, dried fodder, hops, sugar beet, cane and chicory, fruit and vegetables and short rotation coppice. to be determined by each Member State among those listed in Annex I of the Treaty ;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2103 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may decide to use up to 120 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II provided that:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2135 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States having allocated during at least one year in the period 2010-2013 more than 10 % of their amount available for granting the direct payments provided for in Titles III, IV and V of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, with the exception of Section 6 of Chapter 1 of Title IV, for financing the measures laid down in Section 2 of Chapter 2 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the support provided for in points (i) to (iv) of paragraph 1(a) and paragraphs 1(b) and (e) of Article 68 of that Regulation, or the measures under Chapter 1, with the exception of Section 6, of Title IV of that Regulation may decide to use more than 1, or the support provided for in Chapter 4 of Title V of that Regulation may decide to use 20 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II upon approval by the Commission in accordance with Article 41.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2143 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States may, by 1 August 2016of each year, review their decision pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 and decide, with effect from 2017the subsequent year:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2192 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1
1. FMember States may set up a simplified small farmers scheme in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Title. If the Member State applies such a scheme, farmers holding payment entitlements allocated in 2014 pursuant to Article 21 and fulfilling the minimum requirements provided for in Article 10(1) may opt for participation in a simplified scheme under the conditions laid down in this Title, hereinafter referred to as 'small farmers scheme'
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2236 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shallmay set the amount of the annual payment for the small farmers scheme at one of the following levels, subject to paragraphs 2 and 3:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2293 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) With a view to ensuring that the amounts for the financing of the CAP comply with the annual ceilings referred to in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) No […] [HZR], an adjustment of the level of direct support in any calendar year should be maintained. The adjustment of the direct payments should only be applied to payments to be granted to farmers in excess of EUR 5 000 in the corresponding calendar year. Taking into account the levels of direct payments for farmers in Bulgaria, Croatia and RomanCroatia in the framework of the application of the phasing-in mechanism to all direct payments granted in thoseis Member States, this instrument of financial discipline should only apply in Bulgaria and Romania as from 1 January 2016 and in Croatia as from 1 January 2022.
2012/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2294 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 – last sentence
To ensure equal treatment of farmers whose direct payments are subject to phasing-in in Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania,Croatia the minimum threshold should be based on the final amounts to be granted at the end of the phasing-in process.
2012/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2295 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. In the framework of the gradual introduction of direct payments as provided for in Article 16, paragraph 1 of this Article shall apply to Bulgaria and Romania as from 1 January 2016 and to Croatia as from 1 January 2022.
2012/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2297 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – Title
Gradual introduction of direct payments in Bulgaria and Romaniadeleted
2012/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 106 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime, it is therefore essential that all Member States introduce provisions laying down obligations on air carriers operating international flights to or from the territory of the Member States of the European Union, intra-EU flights from one Member State to another Member State and domestic flights with a final destination in the same Member State and non-carrier economic operators when involved in booking such flights.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 113 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Air carriers already collect and process PNR data from their passengers for their own commercial purposes. This Directive should not impose any obligation on air carriers and non-carrier economic operators to collect or retain any additional data from passengers or to impose any obligation on passengers to provide any data in addition to that already being provided to air carriers and non-carrier economic operators.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 115 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Non-carrier economic operators, such as travel agencies and tour operators, sell package tours making use of charter flights for which they collect and process PNR data from their customers, yet without necessarily transferring the data to the airline operating the passenger flight.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 139 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) There are two possible methods of data transfer currently available: the ‘pull’ method, under which the competent authorities of the Member State requiring the data can reach into (access) the air carrier’s reservation system and extract (’pull’) a copy of the required data, and the ‘push’ method, under which air carriers and non-carrier economic operators transfer (’push’) the required PNR data to the authority requesting them, thus allowing air carriers to retain control of what data is provided. The ‘push’ method is considered to offer a higher degree of data protection and should be mandatory for all air carriers and non-carrier economic operators.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 143 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) The Member States should take all necessary measures to enable air carriers and non-carrier economic operators to fulfil their obligations under this Directive. Dissuasive, effective and proportionate penalties, including financial ones, should be provided for by Member States against those air carriers and non-carrier economic operators failing to meet their obligations regarding the transfer of PNR data. Where there are repeated serious infringements which might undermine the basic objectives of this Directive, these penalties may include, in exceptional cases, measures such as the immobilisation, seizure and confiscation of the means of transport, or the temporary suspension or withdrawal of the operating licence.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 161 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Member States should share with other Member States and Europol the PNR data that they receive where such transferthis is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security through. The provisions of this Directive should be without prejudice to other Union instruments on the exchange of information between police and judicial authorities, including Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)39 and Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 September 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union40 . Such exchange of PNR data between law enforcement and judicial authorities should be governed by the rules on police and judicial cooperation. __________________ 40 OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 207 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) As a result of the legal and technical differences between national provisions concerning the processing of personal data, including PNR, air carriers and non- carrier economic operators are and will be faced with different requirements regarding the types of information to be transmitted, as well as the conditions under which this information needs to be provided to competent national authorities. These differences may be prejudicial to effective cooperation between the competent national authorities for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 222 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) In particular, the scope of the Directive is as limited as possible, it allows retention of PNR data for period of time not exceeding 57 years, after which the data must be permanently deleted, the data must be anonymised after a very short periodmasked out after 6 months, the collection and use of sensitive data is prohibited. In order to ensure efficiency and a high level of data protection, Member States are required toit must be ensured that an independent national supervisory authority isand in particular its Data Protection Officer are responsible for advising and monitoring how PNR data are processed. All processing of PNR data must be logged or documented for the purpose of verification of the lawfulness of the data processing, self-monitoring and ensuring proper data integrity and security of the data processing. Member States must also ensure that passengers are clearly and precisely informed about the collection of PNR data and their rights.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 227 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive provides for the transfer by air carriers of Passenger Name Record data of passengers of international flights to and from the Member Staterelating to passenger flights between EU Member States and third countries, for intra-EU flights and domestic flights, as well as the processing of that data, including its collection, use and retention by the Member States and its exchange between them.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 231 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Directive shall also apply to non- carrier economic operators that gather or store PNR data on passenger flights planned to land on the territory of a Member State originating in a third country or to depart from the territory of a Member States with a final destination in a third country, to intra-EU-flights and to domestic flights;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 239 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The PNR data collected in accordance with this Directive may be processed only for the following purposes: (a) Thepurposes of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences, and serious crime according to Article 4 (2)(b) and (c); and (b) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2)(a) and (d). or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security. deleted deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 253 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) 'intra-EU flight' means any scheduled or non-scheduled flight by an air carrier originating in a Member State with a final destination in another Member State, including any transfer of transit flights;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 254 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) 'domestic flight' means any scheduled or non-scheduled flight by an air carrier originating in a Member State with a final destination in the same Member State;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 260 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) 'reservation systems' means the air carrier's or the non-carrier economic operator's internal inventory system, in which PNR data are collected for the handling of reservations;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 262 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) Non-carrier economic operator means an economic operator, such as travel agencies and tour operators, that provides travel-related services, including the bookings of flights for which they collect and process PNR data of passengers;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 264 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ’push method’ means the method whereby air carriers transfer the required PNR dataand non-carrier economic operator transfer their existing PNR data listed in the Annex to this Directive into the database of the authority requesting them;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 281 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) ‘serious transnational crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, and if : (i) They are committed in more than one state; (ii) They are committed in one state but a substantial part of their preparation, planning, direction or control takes place in another state; (iii) They are committed in one state but involve an organised criminal group that engages in criminal activities in more than one state; or (iv) They are committed in one state but have substantial effects in another state.deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 303 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up or designate an authority competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime and the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security or a branch of such an authority to act as its Passenger Information Unit responsible for collecting PNR data from the air carriers and non-carrier economic operators, storing them, analyprocessing them and transmitting the result of the analysisPNR data or the result of the processing thereof to the competent authorities referred to in Article 5. Its staff members may be seconded from competent public authoritieThe Passenger Information Unit is also responsible for the exchange of PNR data or the result of the processing thereof with Passenger Information Unit of other Member States in accordance with Article 7. Its staff members may be seconded from competent public authorities. It shall be provided with adequate resources in order to fulfil its tasks.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 324 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Each Passenger Information Unit shall appoint an independent Data Protection Officer, who ensures the internal supervision of the Passenger Information Unit's activities and will totally oversee the transfer of PNR data to other competent authorities, to other Member States and Europol. The Data Protection Officer shall report wrong conduct of the data protection requirements set out in this directive
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 333 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The PNR data transferred by the air carriers and the non-carrier economic operators, pursuant to Article 6, in relation to international flights which land on or depart from the territory of each Member State shall be collected only by the Passenger Information Unit of the relevant Member State. Should the PNR data transferred by air carriers and non-carrier economic operators include data beyond those listed in the Annex, the Passenger Information Unit shall delete such data immediately upon receipt.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 344 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) carrying out an assessment of the passengers prior to their scheduled arrival or departure from the Member State in order to identify any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime and who require further examination by the competent authorities referred to in Article 5 as well as Europol. In carrying out such an assessment, the Passenger Information Unit may process PNR data against pre-determined criteria in accordance with this Directive, and may compare PNR data against relevant databases, including international or national databases or national mirrors of Union databases, where they are established on the basis of Union law, on persons or objects sought or under alert, in accordance with Union, international and national rules applicable to such files. Member States shall ensure that any positive match resulting from such automated processing is individually reviewed by non-automated means in order to verify whether the competent authority referred to in Article 5 needs to take action;
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 365 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) responding, on a case-by-case basis based on sufficient evidence, to duly reasoned requests from competent authorities or Europol to provide PNR data and process PNR data in specific cases for the purpose of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious crime listed in Article 2.1 (i) or the prevention of an immediate and serious threat to public security, and to provide the competent authorities with the results of such processing; and
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 411 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall adopt a list of the competent authorities entitled to request or receive masked out PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data from the Passenger Information Units in order to examine that information further or take appropriate action for the specific purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences and serious crime or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security. Europol shall be entitled to request or receive PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data from the Passenger Information Units of the Member States within the limits of its mandate and when necessary for the performance of its tasks.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 418 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities shall consist of authorities competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 429 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The PNR data of passengers and the result of the processing of PNR data received by the Passenger Information Unit may be further processed by the competent authorities of the Member States only for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting terrorist offences or serious crime or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 446 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that air carriers and non-carrier economic operators transfer ('push') the PNR data as defined in Article 2(c) and specified in the Annex, to the extent that such data are already collected by them, to the database of the national Passenger Information Unit of the Member State on the territory of which the international flight will land or from the territory of which the flight will depart. Where the flight is code-shared between one or more air carriers, the obligation to transfer the PNR data of all passengers on the flight shall be on the air carrier and the non-carrier economic operator that operates the flight. Where the flight has one or more stop-overs at the airports of the Member States, air carriers and the non-carrier economic operators shall transfer the PNR data to the Passenger Information Units of all the Member States concerned.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 457 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Air carriers and non-carrier economic operator shall transfer PNR data by electronic means using the common protocols and supported data formats to be adopted in accordance with the procedure of Articles 13 and 14 or, in the event of technical failure, by any other appropriate means ensuring an appropriate level of data security:
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 469 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may permit air carriers and non-carrier economic operators to limit the transfer referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 to updates of the transfer referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 476 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. On a case-by-case basis, upon request from a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with national law, air carriers and non-carrier economic operator shall transfer PNR data where access earlier than that mentioned in point (a) of paragraph 2 is necessary to assist in responding to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 485 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to persons identified by a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with Article 4(2)(a) and (b), the result of the processing of PNR data is transmitted by that Passenger Information Unit to the Passenger Information Units of other Member States where the former Passenger Information Unit considersand to Europol where any elements indicate such a transfer to be necessaryhelpful for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious crime or the prevention of immediate and serious threats to public security. The Passenger Information Units of the receiving Member States shallmay transmit such PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data to their relevant competent authorities through using their Passenger Information Unit and using Europol's existing Secure Information Exchange Network Application (SIENA).
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 524 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Exceptionally, where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious crime or to prevent an immediate and serious threat to public security, the Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State to provide it with PNR data of flights landing in or departing from the latter’s territory at any time.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 539 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Member States shall ensure that their Passenger Information Unit's, in order to fulfil their tasks as laid down in Article 4(2)(c), co-operate in the application of state-of-the-art technologies through Europol using technologies that shall allow Passenger and Europol to combine their data with that of other Passenger Information Unit's by ensuring full protection of personal data with the aim of analysing the data pursuant to Article 4(2)(c).
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 612 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the PNR data provided by the air carriers and non- carrier economic operators to the Passenger Information Unit are retained in a database at the Passenger Information Unit for a period of 30 day6 months after their transfer to the Passenger Information Unit of the first Member State on whose territory the international flight is landing or departing.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 628 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Upon expiry of the period of 30 day6 months after the transfer of the PNR data to the Passenger Information Unit referred to in paragraph 1, the data shall be retained at the Passenger Information Unit for a further period of fiseven years. During this period, all data elements which could serve to identify the passenger to whom PNR data relate shall be masked out. Such anonymisedmasked out PNR data shall be accessible only to a limited number of personnel of the Passenger Information Unit specifically authorised to carry out analysis of PNR data and develop assessment criteria according to Article 4(2)(d). Access to the full PNR data shall be permitted only by the Head of the Passenger Information Unit for the purposes of Article 4(2)(c) and where it could be reasonably believed that it is necessary to carry out an investigation and in response to a specific and actual threat or risk or a specific investigation or prosecution.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 679 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure, in conformity with their national law, that dissuasive, effective and proportionate penalties, including financial penalties, are provided for against air carriers and non-carrier economic operators which, do not transmit the data required under this Directive, to the extent that they are already collected by the them, or do not do so in the required format or otherwise infringe the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 687 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Each Passenger Information Unit shall appoint a Data Protection Officer in order to ensure compliance with existing national and Union data protection law and fundamental rights; that person shall be trained and qualified to a high standard in data protection law.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 704 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Those persons who operate security controls, who access and analyse the PNR data, and who operate the data logs, must be security cleared and security trained.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 713 #

2011/0023(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. Any transfer of PNR data by Passenger Information Units and competent authorities to private parties in Member States or in third countries shall be prohibited. Any wrong conduct should be sanctioned.
2015/04/20
Committee: LIBE