BETA

Activities of Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER

Plenary speeches (398)

Work-life balance for parents and carers (debate) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0085(COD)
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector - Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs - Adapting to development in the road transport sector (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0123(COD)
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2170(REG)
Negotiations ahead of Parliament's first reading (Rule 69c) FR
2016/11/22
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0070(COD)
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0070(COD)
Combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2897(RSP)
Establishing a Skills Guarantee (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2799(RSP)
Accession of Peru to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0267/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0168(NLE)
Accession of Kazakhstan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0268/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0169(NLE)
Accession of Korea to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0266/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0173(NLE)
European Public Prosecutor's office and Eurojust (B8-1054/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2750(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece following the earthquake that affected the Ionian Islands in November 2015 (A8-0270/2016 - Georgios Kyrtsos) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2165(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/001 FI/Microsoft (A8-0273/2016 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2211(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/002 SE/Ericsson (A8-0272/2016 - Esteban González Pons) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2214(BUD)
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Giorgos Grammatikakis (A8-0279/2016 - António Marinho e Pinto) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2084(IMM)
The future of ACP-EU relations beyond 2020 (A8-0263/2016 - Norbert Neuser) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2053(INI)
Travel document for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (A8-0201/2016 - Jussi Halla-aho) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0306(COD)
Asylum: provisional measures in favour of Italy and Greece (A8-0236/2016 - Ska Keller) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0089(NLE)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0247/2016 - Laura Agea) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0043(NLE)
Application of the Postal Services Directive (A8-0254/2016 - Markus Ferber) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2010(INI)
Access to finance for SMEs and increasing the diversity of SME funding in a Capital Markets Union (A8-0222/2016 - Othmar Karas) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2032(INI)
How best to harness the job creation potential of SMEs? (A8-0248/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2320(INI)
Application of the Employment Equality Directive (A8-0225/2016 - Renate Weber) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2116(INI)
Activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (A8-0227/2016 - Marian Harkin) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2284(INI)
Cohesion Policy and Research and Innovation Strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) (A8-0159/2016 - Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2278(INI)
European territorial cooperation - best practices and innovative measures (A8-0202/2016 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2280(INI)
Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector (A8-0246/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2090(INI)
EU-China Agreement relating to the accession of Croatia (A8-0231/2016 - Iuliu Winkler) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0298(NLE)
EU-Uruguay Agreement relating to the accession of Croatia (A8-0241/2016 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0058(NLE)
Towards a new energy market design (A8-0214/2016 - Werner Langen) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2322(INI)
EU strategy on heating and cooling (A8-0232/2016 - Adam Gierek) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2058(INI)
EU strategy for the Alpine region (A8-0226/2016 - Mercedes Bresso) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2324(INI)
EU Trust Fund for Africa: implications for development and humanitarian aid (A8-0221/2016 - Ignazio Corrao) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2341(INI)
Creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance (A8-0253/2016 - Tatjana Ždanoka, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2017(INI)
EU-Peru Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0197/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0199(NLE)
Social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility (A8-0217/2016 - Eleonora Forenza) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2038(INI)
Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative (debate) FR
2016/11/22
EU-Palau Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0177/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0193(NLE)
EU-Tonga Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0179/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0196(NLE)
EU-Colombia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0178/2016 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0201(NLE)
2015 Report on policy coherence for development (A8-0165/2016 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2317(INI)
Framework Agreement on parental leave (A8-0076/2016 - Maria Arena) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2097(INI)
Preventing and combating trafficking in human beings (A8-0144/2016 - Catherine Bearder) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2118(INI)
Meeting the antipoverty target in the light of increasing household costs (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2223(INI)
Use of Passenger Name Record data (EU PNR) (A8-0248/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0023(COD)
Protection of trade secrets against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (A8-0199/2015 - Constance Le Grip) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0402(COD)
2015 Report on Turkey (B8-0442/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2898(RSP)
Meeting the antipoverty target in the light of increasing household costs (A8-0040/2016 - Tamás Meszerics) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2223(INI)
Private sector and development (A8-0043/2016 - Nirj Deva) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2205(INI)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/009 SE/Volvo Trucks (A8-0077/2016 - Victor Negrescu) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2022(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: EGF/2016/000 TA 2016/Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0078/2016 - Andrey Novakov) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2025(BUD)
The EU in a changing global environment - a more connected, contested and complex world (A8-0069/2016 - Sandra Kalniete) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2272(INI)
Implementation and review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy (A8-0051/2016 - Tamás Meszerics) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2220(INI)
Zika virus outbreak (B8-0449/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2584(RSP)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Products originating in certain ACP states (A8-0010/2016 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0128(COD)
Fisheries partnership agreement with Denmark and Greenland: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0067/2016 - Marco Affronte) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0152(NLE)
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: fisheries aspects (A8-0042/2016 - Norica Nicolai) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2109(INI)
The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (A8-0066/2016 - Roberta Metsola, Kashetu Kyenge) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2095(INI)
Towards improved single market regulation (A8-0278/2015 - Anneleen Van Bossuyt) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2089(INI)
Learning EU at school (A8-0021/2016 - Damian Drăghici) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2138(INI)
Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in vocational education and training (A8-0049/2016 - Ernest Maragall) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2257(INI)
Small-scale coastal fishing in regions dependent on fishing (A8-0044/2016 - Ruža Tomašić) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2090(INI)
External dimension of the CFP, including fisheries agreements (A8-0052/2016 - Linnéa Engström) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2091(INI)
Posting of workers (debate) FR
2016/11/22
What is a 'social triple-A' rating? (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3024(RSP)
Authorisation for Austria to sign and ratify, and Malta to accede to, the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 (A8-0018/2016 - Viktor Uspaskich) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0177(NLE)
Opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand (B8-0250/2016) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2932(RSP)
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement (A8-0372/2015 - Ulrike Lunacek) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0094(NLE)
Appliances burning gaseous fuels (A8-0147/2015 - Catherine Stihler) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0136(COD)
Multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (A8-0367/2015 - Gabriel Mato) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0096(COD)
External factors that represent hurdles to European female entrepreneurship (A8-0369/2015 - Barbara Matera) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2111(INI)
Labour mobility (debate) FR
2016/11/22
EU-Dominica agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0322/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0050(NLE)
EU-Vanuatu agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0329/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0052(NLE)
EU-Trinidad and Tobago agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0323/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0054(NLE)
EU-Samoa agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0320/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0056(NLE)
EU-Grenada agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0326/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0057(NLE)
EU-Timor-Leste agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0327/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0058(NLE)
EU-Saint Lucia agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0321/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0060(NLE)
EU-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0325/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0061(NLE)
EU-United Arab Emirates agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0324/2015 - Mariya Gabriel) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0062(NLE)
Scheme of control and enforcement applicable in the North-East Atlantic fisheries (A8-0294/2015 - Ole Christensen) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0063(COD)
Making Europe's electricity grid fit for 2020 (A8-0330/2015 - Peter Eriksson) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2108(INI)
A new CFP: structure for technical measures and multiannual plans (A8-0328/2015 - Gabriel Mato) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2092(INI)
The state of play of the Doha Development Agenda in view of the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-1230/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2632(RSP)
Education for children in emergency situations and protracted crises (B8-1240/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2977(RSP)
Prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (A8-0316/2015 - Rachida Dati) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2063(INI)
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on child poverty (A8-0310/2015 - Inês Cristina Zuber) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2237(INI)
Cohesion policy and marginalised communities (A8-0314/2015 - Terry Reintke) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2247(INI)
Interoperability solutions as a means for modernising the public sector (A8-0225/2015 - Carlos Zorrinho) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0185(COD)
Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (A8-0213/2015 - Anna Záborská) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2160(INI)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: disasters in Bulgaria and Greece in 2015 (A8-0253/2015 - Andrey Novakov) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2151(BUD)
Common provisions on European Structural and Investment Funds: specific measures for Greece (A8-0260/2015 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0160(COD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/002 DE/Adam Opel (A8-0273/2015 - Jens Geier) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2208(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/003 BE/Ford Genk (A8-0272/2015 - Paul Rübig) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2209(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2015/004 IT/Alitalia (A8-0274/2015 - Monika Vana) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2212(BUD)
Role of local authorities in developing countries in development cooperation (A8-0232/2015 - Eleni Theocharous) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2004(INI)
Council Decision establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy, Greece and Hungary [COM(2015)0451 - C8-0271/2015 - 2015/0209(NLE)] FR
2016/11/22
Preparation of the Commission Work Programme 2016 (B8-0656/2015, B8-0659/2015, B8-0660/2015, B8-0661/2015, B8-0662/2015, B8-0663/2015, B8-0664/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2729(RSP)
Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0173/2015 - Tamás Deutsch) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2245(INI)
Women's careers in science and university (A8-0235/2015 - Elissavet Vozemberg) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2251(INI)
Empowering girls through education in the EU (A8-0206/2015 - Liliana Rodrigues) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2250(INI)
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combatting unemployment (A8-0247/2015 - Verónica Lope Fontagné) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2236(INI)
Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century (A8-0222/2015 - Martina Dlabajová) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece (A8-0245/2015 - Ska Keller) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0125(NLE)
Urban dimension of EU policies (A8-0218/2015 - Kerstin Westphal) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2213(INI)
ILO Forced Labour Convention: social policy (A8-0243/2015 - Patrick Le Hyaric) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0259(NLE)
Cloning of animals kept and reproduced for farming purposes (A8-0216/2015 - Giulia Moi, Renate Sommer) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0433(COD)
Family businesses in Europe (A8-0223/2015 - Angelika Niebler) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Research and innovation in the blue economy to create jobs and growth (A8-0214/2015 - João Ferreira) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2240(INI)
Follow up to the European citizens' initiative Right2Water (A8-0228/2015 - Lynn Boylan) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2239(INI)
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (A8-0209/2015 - Julia Reda) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2256(INI)
Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (A8-0175/2015 - Bernd Lange) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2228(INI)
Scientific and technological cooperation with India: renewal of the agreement (A8-0179/2015 - Jerzy Buzek) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0293(NLE)
Seafarers (A8-0127/2015 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0390(COD)
Resource efficiency: moving towards a circular economy (A8-0215/2015 - Sirpa Pietikäinen) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2208(INI)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: Floods in Romania, Bulgaria and Italy (A8-0211/2015 - Siegfried Mureşan) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2079(BUD)
Review of the implementation of the Dairy package (A8-0187/2015 - James Nicholson) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2146(INI)
The fruit and vegetables sector since the 2007 reform (A8-0170/2015 - Nuno Melo) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2147(INI)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia (A8-0171/2015 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2036(INI)
Recent revelations of high-level corruption cases in FIFA (RC-B8-0548/2015, B8-0548/2015, B8-0549/2015, B8-0550/2015, B8-0571/2015, B8-0572/2015, B8-0573/2015, B8-0574/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2730(RSP)
State of EU-Russia relations (A8-0162/2015 - Gabrielius Landsbergis) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2001(INI)
2014 Progress Report on Turkey (B8-0455/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2953(RSP)
EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015 (A8-0163/2015 - Maria Noichl) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2152(INI)
Decision on the opening of, and mandate for, interinstitutional negotiations on Aid scheme for the supply of fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk in the educational establishments - 2014/0014(COD) (B8-0362/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0014(COD)
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (A8-0054/2015 - Arnaud Danjean) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2220(INI)
Maternity leave (B8-0453/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2655(RSP)
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (B8-0460/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2684(RSP)
Youth Employment Initiative (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Financing for development (A8-0143/2015 - Pedro Silva Pereira) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2044(INI)
Safer healthcare in Europe (A8-0142/2015 - Piernicola Pedicini) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2207(INI)
Green growth opportunities for SMEs (A8-0135/2015 - Philippe De Backer) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2209(INI)
Maternity leave (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Discharge 2013: European GNSS Agency (GNSS) (A8-0095/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2114(DEC)
Discharge 2013: ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking (A8-0103/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2132(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking (A8-0107/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2131(DEC)
Discharge 2013: ENIAC Joint Undertaking (A8-0104/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2135(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (A8-0112/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2134(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Joint Undertaking for ITER and the development of fusion energy (A8-0108/2015 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2129(DEC)
Discharge 2013: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0110/2015 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2130(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Commission and executive agencies (A8-0101/2015 - Ingeborg Gräßle) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2075(DEC)
Pre-financing of operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative (A8-0134/2015 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0026(COD)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - 8th, 9th and 10th EDFs (A8-0102/2015 - Martina Dlabajová) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2077(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0082/2015 - Gilles Pargneaux) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2078(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2079(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0109/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2086(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Court of Justice (A8-0111/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2080(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A8-0113/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2081(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Economic and Social Committee (A8-0114/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2082(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0105/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2083(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0115/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2084(DEC)
Discharge 2013: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0118/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2139(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0117/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2123(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0081/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2124(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CDT) (A8-0084/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2101(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (A8-0079/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2087(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0086/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2112(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0074/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2106(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0085/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2126(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0072/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2120(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0069/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2109(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0073/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2116(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0083/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2099(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2115(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0097/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2108(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0098/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2119(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0096/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2121(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0077/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2125(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0075/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2102(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0068/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2090(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0088/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2105(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0089/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2110(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Railway Agency (ERA) (A8-0078/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2111(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0087/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2122(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0090/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2104(DEC)
Discharge 2013 : European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (EU-LISA) (A8-0099/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2128(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0076/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2100(DEC)
Discharge 2013: Euratom Supply Agency (EURATOM) (A8-0119/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2117(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) (A8-0092/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2088(DEC)
Discharge 2013: The European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) (A8-0091/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2103(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Police Office (EUROPOL) (A8-0080/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2118(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) (A8-0093/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2089(DEC)
Discharge 2013: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (FRONTEX) (A8-0094/2015 - Ryszard Czarnecki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2113(DEC)
Pre-financing of operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0026(COD)
Pre-financing of operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0026(COD)
Employment quotas for people with disabilities in the EU institutions (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Employment conditions including minimum rates of pay applicable to the transport sector - Compliance of the German provisions with European law on the minimum wage in the transport sector (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Fight against child sexual abuse on the Internet (RC-B8-0217/2015, B8-0217/2015, B8-0218/2015, B8-0219/2015, B8-0220/2015, B8-0226/2015, B8-0227/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2564(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0033/2015 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2021(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/009 PL/Zachem (A8-0036/2015 - Jan Olbrycht) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2016(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/007 BE/Hainaut Steel (Duferco-NLMK) (A8-0031/2015 - Andrej Plenković) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2019(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/012 BE/ArcelorMittal (A8-0035/2015 - Victor Negrescu) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2020(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/014 DE/Aleo Solar (A8-0030/2015 - Iris Hoffmann) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2018(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit (A8-0034/2015 - Liadh Ní Riada) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2017(BUD)
Progress on equality between women and men in the EU in 2013 (A8-0015/2015 - Marc Tarabella) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2217(INI)
Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0218(COD)
US Senate report on the use of torture by the CIA (B8-0098/2015, RC-B8-0123/2015, B8-0123/2015, B8-0133/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2997(RSP)
Anti-terrorism measures (B8-0100/2015, RC-B8-0122/2015, B8-0122/2015, B8-0124/2015, B8-0125/2015, B8-0126/2015, B8-0127/2015, B8-0132/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2530(RSP)
Renewal of the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (RC-B8-0099/2015, B8-0099/2015, B8-0121/2015, B8-0130/2015, B8-0131/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2526(RSP)
Country of origin labelling for meat ingredients in processed food (B8-0097/2015) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2543(RSP)
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs (A8-0038/2014 - Frédérique Ries) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0208(COD)
Recognition of Palestine statehood (RC-B8-0277/2014, B8-0277/2014, B8-0309/2014, B8-0310/2014, B8-0349/2014, B8-0357/2014, B8-0359/2014) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2964(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France (A8-0065/2014 - Marco Zanni) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2185(BUD)
Employment and social aspects of the EU2020 strategy (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/008 FI/STX Rauma (A8-0043/2014 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2137(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/005 FR/GAD (A8-0044/2014 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2137(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/007 IE/Andersen Ireland (A8-0024/2014 - Ivan Štefanec) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2098(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2014/009 EL/Sprider Stores (A8-0023/2014 - Victor Negrescu) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2107(BUD)
Draft general budget of the European Union - 2015 financial year FR
2016/11/22
Outcome of the high level conference on employment in Europe (Milan, 8 October) (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Roll-out of the European Youth Initiative (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2014/001 EL/Nutriart (A8-0004/2014 - Georgios Kyrtsos) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2042(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund : application EGF/2012/010 RO/MECHEL - Romania (A8-0008/2014 - Siegfried Mureşan) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2043(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund : application EGF/2014/003 ES/Aragón food and beverage - Spain (A8-0006/2014 - Anneli Jäätteenmäki) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2054(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund : application EGF/2014/002 NL/Gelderland-Overijssel construction – The Netherlands (A8-0005/2014 - Paul Tang) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2055(BUD)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/010 ES/Castilla y León - Spain (A8-0007/2014 - Esteban González Pons) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2062(BUD)
Youth employment (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Youth employment (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Youth employment (debate) FR
2016/11/22
MEDIA Mundus: audiovisual cooperation programme with professionals from third countries (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0258(COD)
Preparation of the Employment Summit - European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - Renewed Social Agenda - Active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2330(INI)
Preparation of the European Council (19-20 March 2008) - European Economic Recovery Plan - Guidelines for the Member States’ employment policies - Cohesion Policy: investing in the real economy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0252(CNS)
Temporary workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2002/0072(COD)
Social package (Second part: Cross-border healthcare) (debate)
2016/11/22
Employment Policy Guidelines for Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0300(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0310(CNS)
Equality between women and men in 2012 (A7-0073/2014 - Inês Cristina Zuber)
2016/11/22
Elimination of female genital mutilation (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Non-discrimination in the framework of sexual and reproductive health and rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Common provisions on European funds - European Social Fund - European Regional Development Fund and the 'investment for growth and jobs' goal - European Regional Development Fund and the 'European territorial cooperation' goal - Cohesion Fund - European grouping of territorial cooperation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0268(COD)
Common provisions on European funds - European Social Fund - European Regional Development Fund and the 'investment for growth and jobs' goal - European Regional Development Fund and the 'European territorial cooperation' goal - Cohesion Fund - European grouping of territorial cooperation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0268(COD)
Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2014 - all sections (A7-0328/2013 - Monika Hohlmeier, Anne E. Jensen)
2016/11/22
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec)
2016/11/22
Nacrt općeg proračuna Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2014. - svi dijelovi (A7-0328/2013 - Monika Hohlmeier, Anne E. Jensen) HR
2016/11/22
Europski fond za pomorstvo i ribarstvo (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec) HR
2016/11/22
Preparations for the European Council meeting (24-25 October 2013) (debate)
2016/11/22
Sexual and reproductive health and rights (A7-0306/2013 - Edite Estrela)
2016/11/22
EU citizens' mobility and Member States' welfare systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Equal pay for male and female workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2005(INI)
Further macro-financial assistance for Georgia (A7-0244/2013 - Vital Moreira)
2016/11/22
Practical arrangements for the holding of the European elections in 2014 (A7-0219/2013 - Andrew Duff)
2016/11/22
Impact of the crisis on access to care for vulnerable groups (A7-0221/2013 - Jean Lambert)
2016/11/22
Connected TV (A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert)
2016/11/22
Review of the Irish Presidency, including the MFF agreement (B7-0332/2013, RCB7-0334/2013, B7-0334/2013, B7-0335/2013, B7-0339/2013, B7-0340/2013)
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/000 TA 2013 - technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A7-0243/2013 - Alda Sousa)
2016/11/22
Serious cross-border threats to health (A7-0337/2012 - Gilles Pargneaux)
2016/11/22
Implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (A7-0230/2013 - Anni Podimata)
2016/11/22
Reforming the structure of the EU banking sector (A7-0231/2013 - Arlene McCarthy)
2016/11/22
Protection of the EU's financial interests - fight against fraud (A7-0197/2013 - Derek Vaughan)
2016/11/22
Integrated internal control framework (A7-0189/2013 - Andrea Češková)
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (27-28 June 2013) (debate)
2016/11/22
Staff Regulations of officials and Conditions of employment of other servants of the EU (A7-0156/2012 - Dagmar Roth-Behrendt)
2016/11/22
Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (A7-0198/2013 - Alajos Mészáros)
2016/11/22
Application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (A7-0180/2013 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
2016/11/22
External aviation policy (A7-0172/2013 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
2016/11/22
Statute for a European Foundation (A7-0223/2013 - Evelyn Regner)
2016/11/22
Port State control (A7-0394/2012 - Brian Simpson)
2016/11/22
Priority substances in the field of water policy (A7-0397/2012 - Richard Seeber)
2016/11/22
Blue growth - enhancing sustainable growth in the marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors (A7-0209/2013 - Spyros Danellis)
2016/11/22
Contribution of cooperatives to overcoming the crisis (A7-0222/2013 - Patrizia Toia)
2016/11/22
A bioeconomy for Europe (A7-0201/2013 - Paolo Bartolozzi)
2016/11/22
Re-use of public sector information (A7-0404/2012 - Ivailo Kalfin)
2016/11/22
2013 review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS (A7-0147/2013 - Elmar Brok, Roberto Gualtieri)
2016/11/22
Promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief (A7-0203/2013 - Laima Liucija Andrikienė)
2016/11/22
Millennium development goals (A7-0165/2013 - Filip Kaczmarek)
2016/11/22
Laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) (A7-0214/2013 - Antonio Masip Hidalgo)
2016/11/22
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (A7-0183/2013 - Emer Costello)
2016/11/22
Establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints (A7-0432/2012 - Monica Luisa Macovei)
2016/11/22
Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders (A7-0200/2012 - Renate Weber)
2016/11/22
Establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis (A7-0215/2013 - Carlos Coelho)
2016/11/22
Amendment of Schengen border code and Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (A7-0206/2013 - Georgios Papanikolaou)
2016/11/22
Social investment for growth and cohesion (B7-0255/2013)
2016/11/22
Fund for European aid to the most deprived (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0295(COD)
Long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks - 1 (A7-0141/2013 - Diane Dodds)
2016/11/22
A new agenda for European consumer policy (A7-0163/2013 - Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón)
2016/11/22
Legal aid in cross-border civil and commercial disputes (A7-0161/2013 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
2016/11/22
Customs enforcement of intellectual property rights (A7-0185/2013 - Jürgen Creutzmann)
2016/11/22
Health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (A7-0009/2013 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier)
2016/11/22
Long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks - 2 (A7-0146/2013 - Diane Dodds)
2016/11/22
Organised crime, corruption and money laundering (A7-0175/2013 - Salvatore Iacolino)
2016/11/22
Social housing in the European Union (A7-0155/2013 - Karima Delli)
2016/11/22
Educational and occupational mobility of women (A7-0164/2013 - Licia Ronzulli)
2016/11/22
Health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0152(COD)
Health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0152(COD)
Reinstatement of Myanmar/Burma's access to generalised tariff preferences (A7-0122/2013 - David Martin)
2016/11/22
Financial responsibility linked to investor-state dispute settlement tribunals established by international agreements to which the EU is party (A7-0124/2013 - Paweł Zalewski)
2016/11/22
Animal health requirements governing trade in dogs, cats and ferrets (A7-0366/2012 - Horst Schnellhardt)
2016/11/22
EU trade and investment agreement negotiations with the US (B7-0187/2013, B7-0195/2013)
2016/11/22
A macro-regional strategy for the Alps (B7-0190/2013, B7-0190/2013, B7-0196/2013, B7-0197/2013, B7-0229/2013)
2016/11/22
Labour conditions and health and safety standards following the recent factory fires and building collapse in Bangladesh (RCB7-0223/2013, B7-0223/2013, B7-0224/2013, B7-0225/2013, B7-0230/2013, B7-0231/2013, B7-0232/2013)
2016/11/22
Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens (A7-0162/2013 - Mojca Kleva Kekuš)
2016/11/22
Mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters (A7-0126/2013 - Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonyia Parvanova)
2016/11/22
EU-Canada Agreement on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security (A7-0152/2013 - Peter Šťastný)
2016/11/22
Implementation of the audiovisual media services directive (A7-0055/2013 - Piotr Borys)
2016/11/22
EU-Sri Lanka Agreement on certain aspects of air services (A7-0169/2013 - Petri Sarvamaa)
2016/11/22
Amendment of Regulation (EEC/Euratom) No 354/83, as regards the deposit of the historical archives of the institutions at the European University Institute in Florence (A7-0156/2013 - Doris Pack)
2016/11/22
Regional strategies for industrial areas in the European Union (A7-0145/2013 - Jens Geier)
2016/11/22
Offshore oil and gas prospection, exploration and production activities (A7-0121/2013 - Ivo Belet)
2016/11/22
Women's rights in the Balkan accession countries (A7-0136/2013 - Marije Cornelissen)
2016/11/22
Adequate, safe and sustainable pensions (A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten)
2016/11/22
Flag State responsibilities for the enforcement of Council Directive 2009/13/EC implementing the Agreement concluded by the European Community Shipowners’ Associations and the European Transport Workers’ Federation on the Maritime Labour Convention (A7-0037/2013 - Pervenche Berès)
2016/11/22
Integration of migrants, its effects on the labour market and the external dimension of social security coordination (A7-0040/2013 - Nadja Hirsch)
2016/11/22
Asbestos-related occupational health threats and prospects for abolishing all existing asbestos (A7-0025/2013 - Stephen Hughes)
2016/11/22
Impact of the economic crisis on gender equality and women's rights - Eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU - Situation of women in North Africa (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2116(INI)
Impact of the economic crisis on gender equality and women's rights - Eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU - Situation of women in North Africa (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2116(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual growth survey 2013 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the annual growth survey 2013 - Governance of the single market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2260(INL)
Elimination and prevention of all forms of violence against women and girls (debate)
2016/11/22
Information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2061(INL)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2027(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0395(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0395(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0137(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0137(COD)
Equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2285(INL)
Equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2285(INL)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0105(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0105(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0105(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2194(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2194(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0380(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0380(COD)
Food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0212(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0212(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0212(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0212(COD)
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund crisis derogation (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2116(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2116(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2116(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2116(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2116(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0362(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2087(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2087(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2008(INI)
European platform against poverty and social exclusion (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2052(INI)
Agenda for new skills and jobs (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2067(INI)
State of play of the Maternity Leave Directive (debate)
2016/11/22
"Food for Free" programme (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0167(COD)
EU homelessness strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Scheme for food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2722(RSP)
ILO Convention supplemented by a recommendation on domestic workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Female poverty - Equality between women and men - 2010 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2138(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0129(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0129(COD)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States - Europe 2020 - Implementation of the guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0007(CNS)
Adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2239(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0227(COD)
Economic governance and Article 9 of the Treaty of Lisbon (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0229(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0193(COD)
Development aspects of the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty - Role of minimum income in combating poverty and promoting an inclusive society in Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding - Precarious women workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0193(COD)
Improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding - Precarious women workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0193(COD)
Improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding - Precarious women workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0193(COD)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0115(NLE)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2236(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2236(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0005(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0005(COD)
The organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0195(COD)
G20 labour and employment ministers meeting (Washington, 20/21 April) (debate)
2016/11/22
Effects of the Xynthia storm in Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Framework Agreement on prevention from sharp injuries in the hospital and healthcare sector (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2529(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0091(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0091(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Sweden-Volvo; Austria-Steiermark; Netherlands-Heijmans (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2183(BUD)
European Microfinance Facility for Employment and Social Inclusion (Progress) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0096(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0062(NLE)
The ratification and implementation of the updated ILO conventions (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2775(RSP)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Belgium - textile industry; Ireland - Dell - Relocation of undertakings in the EU and the role of EU financial instruments (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2135(BUD)
Explanations of vote (continuation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2088(INI)
Explanations of vote (continuation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2088(INI)
Explanations of vote (continuation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2088(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2002B(BUD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2002B(BUD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2002B(BUD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0015(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0015(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0015(CNS)

Reports (7)

PDF (1 MB) DOC (164 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2016/0070(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(164 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on the European Social Fund, as regards an increase of the initial pre-financing amount paid to operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative PDF (355 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/0026(COD)
Documents: PDF(355 KB) DOC(91 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on seafarers amending Directives 2008/94/EC, 2009/38/EC, 2002/14/EC, 98/59/EC and 2001/23/EC PDF (524 KB) DOC (346 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/0390(COD)
Documents: PDF(524 KB) DOC(346 KB)
REPORT on the impact of the economic crisis on gender equality and women’s rights PDF (263 KB) DOC (171 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2012/2301(INI)
Documents: PDF(263 KB) DOC(171 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (XXth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) PDF (455 KB) DOC (754 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0152(COD)
Documents: PDF(455 KB) DOC(754 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 PDF (792 KB) DOC (1 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/0268(COD)
Documents: PDF(792 KB) DOC(1 MB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2004/40/EC on minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (eighteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) PDF (140 KB) DOC (176 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0003(COD)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(176 KB)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on Erasmus+ and other tools to foster mobility in VET – a lifelong learning approach PDF (449 KB) DOC (167 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CULT
Dossiers: 2015/2257(INI)
Documents: PDF(449 KB) DOC(167 KB)

Opinions (5)

OPINION on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(200 KB)
OPINION Communication from the Commission to the European Council : A European Economic Recovery Plan
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(75 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as regards the financial allocation for certain Member States from the European Social Fund
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(62 KB)
OPINION on mobility and inclusion of people with disabilities and the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(95 KB)
OPINION Funding and functioning of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(95 KB)

Shadow opinions (4)

OPINION on poverty: a gender perspective
2016/11/22
Committee: CULT
Dossiers: 2015/2228(INI)
Documents: PDF(129 KB) DOC(192 KB)
OPINION on Recommendations to the European Commission on the negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2233(INI)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(196 KB)
OPINION on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2157(INI)
Documents: PDF(116 KB) DOC(90 KB)
OPINION on the Commission communication on Action against Cancer: European Partnership
2016/11/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2009/2103(INI)
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(91 KB)

Institutional motions (6)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on summer-time arrangements PDF (256 KB) DOC (50 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2968(RSP)
Documents: PDF(256 KB) DOC(50 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU PDF (257 KB) DOC (47 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2897(RSP)
Documents: PDF(257 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for a European reindustrialisation policy in light of the recent Caterpillar and Alstom cases PDF (267 KB) DOC (71 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2891(RSP)
Documents: PDF(267 KB) DOC(71 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the List of Issues adopted by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in relation to the initial report of the European Union PDF (254 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2684(RSP)
Documents: PDF(254 KB) DOC(72 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the steel sector in the EU: protecting workers and industries PDF (134 KB) DOC (61 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2976(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Youth Employment PDF (129 KB) DOC (58 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2713(RSP)
Documents: PDF(129 KB) DOC(58 KB)

Oral questions (5)

Taxation of ports PDF (105 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(105 KB) DOC(16 KB)
The EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (203 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Documents: PDF(203 KB) DOC(18 KB)
The EU accession to the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women PDF (202 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2966(RSP)
Documents: PDF(202 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Call for a limitation of abusive fees charged for cross-border intra-EU phone calls and SMSs in the upcoming review of the telecoms framework PDF (106 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Preventive measures to tackle the gender pension gap in the EU PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Written explanations (254)

Promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (A8-0321/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Grzyb sur la promotion de véhicules de transport routier propres et économes en énergie. Cet accord fixe des standards techniques pour les camions et les autobus, afin que moins de carburant soit consommé par ceux-ci. De plus, ce rapport encourage les appels d'offres publics à favoriser les véhicules de transport propres. Le Parlement européen est engagé pour le climat et la protection de l’environnement, et c’est parce que ce rapport va dans ce sens que je l’ai soutenu.
2016/11/22
Promotion of the use of SME growth markets (A8-0437/2018 - Anne Sander) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de ma collègue SANDER sur la promotion du recours aux marchés de croissance des PME. Afin de pallier aux coûts de mise en conformité élevés et à la charge administrative qui empêchent les petites et moyennes entreprises de se lancer sur les marchés financiers, ce rapport permet un accès facilité, pour les PME, aux marchés de croissance. Ces plateformes dédiées permettent une entrée plus simple vers les marchés boursiers, apportant ainsi de nouvelles sources de financement pour les entreprises.
2016/11/22
Work-life balance for parents and carers (A8-0270/2018 - David Casa) FR

La charge familiale, entre enfants et proches dépendants, a toujours reposé sur les femmes, sacrifiant leur valeur sur le marché du travail. Il fallait que cela change, et c’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur du rapport de mon collègue Casa sur l’équilibre entre la vie professionnelle et la vie privée pour les parents et les aidants. Ce rapport représente une grande avancée pour de nombreux pays européens, et contient une clause de non-régression, notamment pour la France, où les droits parentaux seront évidemment maintenus.Le rapport Casa reconnaît trois types de congés: parental, paternité et aidant. Avec un taux fixe de rémunération au niveau du congé maladie de chaque pays membre, le congé paternité sera désormais d’au moins 10 jours. Quant au congé parental, il sera désormais de quatre mois, dont deux non-transférables, avec indemnité – dont le montant sera défini par chaque État membre. Il s’agit d’un réel changement vers une plus grande égalité de carrière entre les femmes et les hommes: les conditions du régime de travail flexible, permettant de concilier vie professionnelle et vie privée, sont désormais définies.
2016/11/22
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dalli concernant les émissions de CO2 des voitures particulières neuves et des véhicules commerciaux légers. Ambitieux, mais tout de même réaliste, ce rapport prévoit la diminution de 37,5 % des émissions de CO2 causées par ces types de véhicules d’ici 2030, permettant ainsi une meilleure qualité de vie pour les 500 millions d’Européens, qui passe notamment par une bonne qualité de l’air et la protection de l’environnement.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0113/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence de Coopération des Régulateurs de l'Énergie, ou ACER.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’ACER à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’ACER pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0120/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence européenne de la sécurité aérienne, ou AESA.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’AESA à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour des comptes européenne sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour des comptes européenne a approuvé la décharge de l’AESA pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0124/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Autorité Bancaire Européenne.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Autorité Bancaire Européenne à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Autorité Bancaire Européenne pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0125/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence Européenne des Produits Chimiques.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Agence Européenne des Produits Chimiques à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Agence Européenne des Produits Chimiques pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0127/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence Européenne pour l'Environnement.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Agence Européenne pour l'Environnement à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Agence Européenne pour l'Environnement pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0133/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence Européenne de Contrôle des Pêches, ou AECP.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’AECP à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’AECP pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0128/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Autorité Européenne de Sécurité des AlimentsLa décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Autorité Européenne de Sécurité des Aliments à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Autorité Européenne de Sécurité des Aliments pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0150/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Institut Européen pour l'Égalité entre les Hommes et les Femmes.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Institut Européen pour l'Égalité entre les Hommes et les Femmes à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Institut Européen pour l'Égalité entre les Hommes et les Femmes pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0152/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Institut Européen d'Innovation et de Technologie.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’Institut Européen d'Innovation et de Technologie à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’Institut Européen d'Innovation et de Technologie pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0139/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Observatoire Européen des Drogues et des Toxicomanies, ou OEDT.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’OEDT à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour Européenne des Auditeurs sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour Européenne des Auditeurs a approuvé la décharge de l’OEDT pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2017: European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) (A8-0158/2019 - Petri Sarvamaa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SARVAMAA concernant l’approbation de la décharge 2017 de l’Agence de l’UE pour les chemins de fer, ou AFE.La décharge évalue la fiabilité et la transparence de la tenue de budget et de la tenue financière de l’AFE à la fin 2017. Ce rapport regroupe les avis de la Cour des comptes européenne sur la légalité des procédures, des transactions financières, des contrôles internes, des gestions de conflits, etc., réalisés par les différentes agences européennes. La Cour des comptes européenne a approuvé la décharge de l’AFE pour leur budget 2017, et je suis leur avis.
2016/11/22
Framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union (A8-0198/2018 - Franck Proust) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Proust sur le cadre pour le filtrage des investissements directs étrangers dans l’Union. Les investissements étrangers, essentiels à l’Union, n’étaient pas, jusqu’à présent, légiférés et ce, malgré les menaces qu’ils peuvent représenter pour la sécurité intérieure et l’ordre public. Ce rapport permettra la collecte, l’analyse et le partage d’informations entre les États membres et l’Union sur le profil des investisseurs. La liste des risques pour les intérêts français et européens a été élargie pour protéger les États membres. Enfin, la Commission a la possibilité d’émettre un avis sur certains projets d’investissement étrangers, même si l’État concerné conserve son droit de décision.
2016/11/22
Treaty establishing the Transport Community (A8-0022/2019 - Karima Delli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport DELLI sur le traité instituant la Communauté des transports. Ce traité de coopération avec les pays des Balkans occidentaux vise à intégrer peu à peu l’Albanie, la Bosnie-Herzégovine, la Croatie, la Macédoine, le Monténégro et la Serbie aux réseaux de transports européens, dans les domaines routier, ferroviaire, fluvial et maritime. À travers une intégration progressive des normes de sécurité, de technique, de gestion et de marché publics, le TNT, diminutif de Transport Community Treaty , est bénéfique tant pour les pays des Balkans que pour l’Union Européenne, grâce à l’harmonisation des systèmes de transports.
2016/11/22
Experiencing backlash in women’s rights and gender equality in the EU (B8-0096/2019, B8-0099/2019) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant le recul des droits des femmes dans l’Union européenne. En tant que femme, membre du comité consultatif contre le harcèlement et ancienne présidente de l’Union européenne pour les femmes, cette résolution me semble essentielle sur de nombreux points. Rappelant la nécessité de l’égalité femmes-hommes, y compris pour les femmes issues de minorités ethniques et religieuses, la résolution note et regrette, entre autres, une hausse des violences conjugales, ainsi qu’une réduction des subventions attribuées aux refuges féminins et aux associations pour les droits des femmes. Nous demandons aux États membres et à la Commission de rester engagés pour la cause des femmes et des LGTBI, de respecter les traités internationaux, notamment sur le sujet des droits reproductifs, et de combattre le harcèlement sexuel et les fake-news sur l’avortement. La résolution recommande également de collaborer avec les hommes, essentiels pour atteindre l’égalité, et de permettre à tous les jeunes d’avoir accès à l’éducation sexuelle.
2016/11/22
Policy challenges and strategies against women's cancers and related comorbidities (B8-0097/2019) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur les enjeux et stratégies politiques de la lutte contre les cancers féminins et les pathologies qui y sont associés. Rappelant qu’un Européen sur trois sera atteint d’un cancer dans sa vie, et que le cancer du sein est le plus mortel chez les femmes, ce rapport préconise une meilleure coordination au niveau européen en termes de recherche et de sensibilisation. Créant parfois de graves problèmes psychologique, affectant l’estime de soi et pouvant entrainer des difficultés dans le travail, la famille et les études, notamment chez les femmes, le Parlement demande l’accès de manière universelle au dépistage, traitement et soutien de qualité après la thérapie. Enfin, nous demandons une recherche de haute qualité sur les causes et le traitement des cancers, féminins entre autres; en particulier sur les liens avec les prothèses mammaires dont la composition n’est pas assez contrôlée, et l’exposition, dans certains secteurs principalement féminins, à des agents cancérigènes. Le droit à accéder à la prévention en matière de santé est inscrit dans la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union Européenne, et ce, pour tous les citoyens.
2016/11/22
Agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (A8-0016/2019 - Norica Nicolai) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Nicolai sur l’accord visant à prévenir la pêche non réglementée en haute mer dans l’océan Arctique central. Signé par le Canada, la République populaire de Chine, le Danemark (à travers les Îles Féroé et le Groenland), l’Islande, le Japon, la République de Corée, la Norvège, la Fédération russe, les États-Unis et l’Union Européenne, cet accord vise à prévenir la pêche non réglementée dans l’océan Arctique central. De plus, la mise en place d’une agence de recherche et de surveillance scientifique, qui établira des rapports sur les ressources disponibles et les écosystèmes afin d’assurer leurs pérennités et de permettre une pêche durable, a été inscrite dans l’accord.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Mexico Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0066/2019 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Rodriguez-Pinero concernant l’accord de partenariat économique, de coordination politique et de coopération qui lie l’Union Européenne et le Mexique. Cet accord a été mis en application en 2000, et permet aux États membres de l’Union européenne et aux États-Unis mexicains de coopérer et d’échanger plus librement. Suite à l’entrée dans l’Union de la République de Croatie, ce rapport permettra au pays d’avoir les mêmes bénéfices et avantages que les autres États membres en ce qui concerne les relations avec le Mexique.
2016/11/22
Multiannual plan for stocks fished in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0310/2018 - Alain Cadec) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Cadec sur le plan pluriannuel pour les stocks halieutiques dans les eaux occidentales et les eaux adjacentes ainsi que pour les pêcheries exploitant ces stocks. À travers ce texte qui remplace différents plans pluriannuels pour les stocks d’espèces uniques, telles que le hareng ou la sole, et qui se base sur des recherches scientifiques actualisés régulièrement, le Parlement européen réaffirme sa volonté de respecter et faire respecter le principe de rendement équilibré maximal. Ce principe, qui permet de consommer la quantité maximale d’une ressource halieutique sur une période illimitée sans l’épuiser ou mettre en danger la pérennité de l’espèce, est essentiel à la préservation de la biodiversité. Ce rapport concerne particulièrement la France, puisque sa zone d’application se situe à l’ouest de l’Europe, dans les «eaux occidentales». Ce rapport concerne quinze espèces maritimes, et se penchera uniquement sur la pêche commerciale, tout en demandant aux États membres de contrôler et de collecter des données sur la pêche commerciale.
2016/11/22
A comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics (A8-0019/2019 - Ashley Fox) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Fox sur une politique industrielle européenne globale sur l’intelligence artificielle et la robotique. Ces deux éléments vont remodeler les secteurs industriels dans les décennies qui viennent. L’Union européenne dispose d’atouts majeurs dans le domaine, et ce rapport en expose les principaux challenges et opportunités. L’aspect éthique est bien entendu essentiel, et le rapport propose des mesures à prendre pour lutter contre les usages malveillants de l’IA, ainsi que la création d’un cadre juridique afin de protéger les données privées. Des politiques concernant directement les citoyens sont également inscrites dans le rapport, telles que l’aide à la reconversion professionnelle, notamment vers l’informatique, pour les salariés touchés par l’automatisation des tâches. Ce rapport liste également les avantages potentiels au développement de l’IA et de la robotique dans l’Union, notamment pour les secteurs industriels de l’énergie, du transport et de la santé.
2016/11/22
Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the EU, Greenland and Denmark (A8-0480/2018 - Maurice Ponga) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ponga sur la décision d’association d’outre-mer. L’objectif du rapport est de ramener tous les fonds accordés aux pays et territoires d’outre-mer européens dans le budget de l’Union Européenne. À travers une enveloppe globale de 690 millions d’euros pour la période 2012-2027, le rapport remplit l’engagement de campagne qui était la création d’un instrument spécifique aux pays et territoires d’outre-mer, et ce, dès 2021. Une répartition plus équitable de cette enveloppe favorise par ailleurs les intérêts des TOM français. Tout en promettant l’aide à la gestion des défis actuels, comme le réchauffement climatique et la gestion des ressources, notamment maritimes, le rapport réaffirme les liens forts qui unissent les PTOM et l’Union européenne en ce qui concerne la mise en œuvre de ses stratégies régionales, ainsi que l’autonomie des territoires sur les sujets économique, d’emploi, de santé publique et d’affaires intérieures.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2017 on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests- fight against fraud (A8-0003/2019 - Marian-Jean Marinescu) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Marinescu sur la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne, en particulier la lutte contre la fraude. En effet, une bonne gestion des dépenses publiques et la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne sont essentielles au maintien de la confiance des citoyens. La transparence, recherchée dans cet accord, assure aux citoyens que leur argent est utilisé efficacement. Pour cela, les députés demandent à la Commission européenne la création d’un système de collecte de données sur la fraude. Ils demandent aussi aux États membres qui ne l’ont pas encore fait de mettre en place une législation contre le crime organisé. Le rapport met en garde contre la corruption, fléau présent dans tous les États membres, mais se félicite d’une baisse du nombre total d’irrégularités enregistrées, ainsi que de leur valeur. Il rappelle le besoin de coopération entre les États membres sur le sujet.
2016/11/22
Role of the German Youth Welfare Office (Jugendamt) in cross-border family disputes (B8-0546/2018) FR

En tant que coordinatrice du Parlement européen pour les droits des enfants, je me suis abstenue sur la résolution résultante de la commission PETI sur le rôle des services allemands de l'aide sociale à l'enfance dans les litiges familiaux transnationaux. Je comprends la détresse des parents et celle des enfants lorsque de tels conflits déchirent des familles, cependant, et pour continuer à travailler avec l'ensemble des autorités compétentes, qu'elles soient locales ou nationales, je préfère ne pas influencer les décisions et les procès en cours. Je reste à l'écoute de toutes les parties pour préserver l'intérêt supérieur des enfants.
2016/11/22
Structural and financial barriers in the access to culture (A8-0169/2018 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Zdrojewski sur les obstacles structurels et financiers limitant l’accès à la culture. Nombreux sont les documents juridiques, comme la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme des Nations unies, démontrant que l’accès à la culture est un des droits fondamentaux des citoyens. La culture est étroitement liée à l’éducation. Plus le niveau d’éducation sera de qualité, et plus la participation à la culture sera forte. Cependant, il y a une inégalité d’accès et il est nécessaire de mettre en pratique des stratégies permettant d’améliorer l’accès à la culture. Il y a notamment des obstacles financiers, de nombreux citoyens estiment que l’accès à la culture représente un réel cout financier. Afin d’améliorer la participation à la culture, il serait nécessaire d’augmenter le financement public des activités culturelles. C’est donc dans un objectif de développer l’accès et la participation à la culture dans les États membres que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy and the circular economy (A8-0184/2018 - Davor Škrlec) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport SKRLEC concernant la politique de cohésion et l’économie circulaire. La politique de cohésion européenne œuvre en faveur d’un développement territorial plus équilibré, permettant de réduire l’écart de développement entre diverses régions et pays. Les politiques de cohésion de l’Union européenne permettent de favoriser le développement durable. L’économie circulaire, qui n’était pas un des domaines d’action prioritaire dans l’Union européenne pour le mandat 2014-2020, est devenu un concept clé dans les politiques européennes. L’objectif de l’économie circulaire est de passer d’un modèle linéaire « extraire-fabriquer-jeter » à un modèle cyclique permettant une réutilisation du produit. Les politiques de cohésion et l’économie circulaire ne concernent pas seulement les infrastructures, mais favorisent et renforcent également la cohésion sociale et la solidarité des États membres de l’Union européenne. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Further macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (A8-0183/2018 - Jarosław Wałęsa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport WALESA sur l’assistance macro-financière supplémentaire à l’Ukraine. Depuis le début de la crise ukrainienne en 2014, l’Union européenne a lancé trois opérations d’assistance macro-financière, pour un coût total de 3.4 milliards d’euros. Les deux objectifs principaux de cette nouvelle opération sont, tout d’abord, d’aider l’Ukraine à couvrir une partie de ses besoins de financement extérieur supplémentaires en 2018-2019 ; et ensuite d’encourager l’Ukraine à intensifier son effort de réforme. L’Union européenne a cependant besoin d’engagements de l’Ukraine, notamment dans le développement d'une meilleure stratégie pour la lutte contre la corruption, ce qui permettra la mise en place d’une gouvernance ukrainienne stable. J’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière, afin de venir en aide à un pays en crise, mais il est nécessaire que l’Ukraine respecte les engagements pris, sinon la Commission européenne suspendra les versements de l’aide.
2016/11/22
Negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0158/2018 - Charles Tannock) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport TANNOCK sur les négociations relatives à la modernisation de l’accord de l’association entre l’Union européenne et le Chili. Nos relations économiques avec le Chili sont essentielles pour l’Union européenne. En effet, même si les deux parties ont été affectées par la crise financière, les échanges commerciaux sont en hausse. Grâce à cette association, le Chili a augmenté son produit intérieur brut, ou encore le niveau de bien-être de la population chilienne. Cet accord avait été signé en 2002, et l’amélioration de ce dernier a pour but d’approfondir les relations entre l’Union européenne et le Chili, notamment en matière de sécurité, politique et commerce. Il est important de faire évoluer nos partenariats avec les pays tiers, et c’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Cyber defence (A8-0189/2018 - Urmas Paet) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport PAET sur la cyberdéfense. Le cyberespace est devenu depuis quelques années un environnement propice à des attaques de différentes natures. Les cyberattaques peuvent engendrer d’importantes conséquences financières ou encore juridiques. La cyberdéfense est l’ensemble des mesures techniques et non techniques permettant à un État de défendre dans le cyberespace les systèmes d’information jugés essentiels. Elle a ainsi pour objectif de lutter contre la criminalité et le terrorisme. Le Parlement européen porte une attention toute particulière à notamment la protection de la vie privée et des données personnelles. Ce rapport permet de faire suite au scandale Facebook, avec la fuite des données personnelles d’environ 2,7 millions de personnes. J’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière car il permet de rappeler l’importance de protéger les citoyens européens du danger du cyberespace.
2016/11/22
State of play of recreational fisheries in the EU (A8-0191/2018 - Norica Nicolai) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Nicolai sur l’état de lieux de la pêche de loisir dans l’Union européenne. Ce rapport concerne la pêche dont le produit péché est destiné à la consommation exclusive du pêcheur, il n’y a donc pas d’objectif commercial. Cette pêche est réglementée par un décret de 1990, modifié en 1999. Elle est soumise à une réglementation semblable à celle appliquée aux pêcheurs professionnels, notamment quant à la taille minimale des captures autorisées, des zones, ou encore des périodes de pêche. Même si le premier motif de cette pêche est le loisir, elle a des retombées économiques, sociales et environnementales. Il est important de réaliser un état des lieux, afin de mettre en place des réglementations plus strictes si nécessaire. Au niveau de l’Union européenne, les pêcheurs de loisir représentent 1.6% de la population européenne. Ces pêcheurs puisent dans les ressources halieutiques, il est donc nécessaire d’évaluer les stocks de l’Union européenne. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport LYBACKA sur la modernisation de l’éducation dans l’Union européenne. L’éducation est un sujet important pour les États membres de l’Union européenne. L’éducation permet de former les citoyens européens de demain, et permet d’augmenter le capital humain au sein de nos pays. Il est nécessaire de mettre en place une éducation plus moderne, permettant de promulguer une meilleure formation. Ce rapport permet de souligner l’importance de moderniser tous les niveaux de l’éducation dans l’Union européenne, et notamment de l’éducation préscolaire et au niveau de la petite enfance. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector (A8-0186/2018 - Carlos Iturgaiz) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport ITURGAIZ concernant l’état des lieux et les défis à venir sur le secteur européen de l’aquaculture pour qu’il soit durable et compétitif. La production aquacole stagne depuis plusieurs années et la stratégie mise en place pour son développement durable n’a pas eu les effets escomptés. Il est nécessaire de donner un nouvel élan à cette dernière. Cet élan est centré autour de trois thèmes principaux: la promotion de la compétitivité de la production aquacole de l’Union européenne par, notamment, la recherche et le développement technologique; la création des conditions d’un développement durable de l’aquaculture en assurant notamment la protection des consommateurs; et l’amélioration de l’image et de la gouvernance du secteur en réduisant les tâches administratives, veillant à une meilleure mise en œuvre de la législation de l’Union. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework (A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport ERTUG concernant la manipulation de l’odomètre des véhicules à moteur (révision du cadre légal de l’Union).Le nombre de kilomètres d’une voiture est un paramètre essentiel à prendre en compte afin d’en estimer le prix. Dans certains pays, la manipulation de l’odomètre concerne presque une voiture d’occasion sur deux. Cette action peut engendrer un phénomène sur le marché des voitures d’occasion que l’on appelle l’asymétrie d’information. Le vendeur connait le nombre de kilomètres de la voiture, et donc sa valeur exacte, contrairement à l'acheteur. Cette asymétrie d’information détruit le marché car les consommateurs perdent confiance en ce dernier.Il est donc primordial d’établir un cadre juridique clair et cohérent à l’ensemble des États membres afin de prévenir ce phénomène. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming the lives of girls and women through EU external relations 2016-2020 (A8-0167/2018 - Linda McAvan, Dubravka Šuica) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Suica/McAvan sur l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et l’émancipation des femmes: transformer la vie des jeunes filles et des femmes dans le contexte des relations extérieures de l’Union européenne (2016-2020).Ce rapport est basé sur trois piliers thématiques. Tout d’abord, il garantit l’intégrité physique et psychologique des femmes et des jeunes filles. Il promeut également les droits économiques et sociaux ainsi que l’autonomisation des femmes et des jeunes filles. Enfin, il renforce la voix et la participation des femmes et des jeunes filles. Il a également pour objectif de prévenir et de mettre fin à toutes formes de violences faites aux femmes.Afin de satisfaire tous ces objectifs, il est cependant nécessaire de créer un budget qui serait dédié à ces problématiques. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport, afin de pouvoir améliorer l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes, lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (A8-0162/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gardiazabal Rubial sur le rapport d’exécution sur la stratégie de l’Union européenne en faveur de la jeunesse. C’est en favorisant des programmes tels qu’Erasmus +, en les encourageant à partir étudier à l'étranger, que les jeunes s'impliqueront dans la vie citoyenne européenne. Ce rapport marque donc une étape importante dans la stratégie européenne en faveur de la jeunesse. En effet, il instaure une meilleure égalité des chances pour tous les jeunes sur le marché du travail, et il souligne l’importance de prendre en compte le point de vue des jeunes. Je suis convaincue que les jeunes sont l’avenir de l’Union européenne, il est donc nécessaire de déployer une stratégie européenne en faveur de la jeunesse efficace et cohérente pour les encourager à participer plus activement à la société. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport RIES sur la mise en œuvre de la directive sur l’écoconception (2009/125/CE). C’est une étape importante dans la réalisation de nos objectifs établis lors des Accords de Paris (COP21) et de l’Agenda 2030 de l’ONU. En effet, l’écoconception prend en compte l’aspect environnemental à chaque étape de la conception d’un bien ou d’un service, et également durant tout le cycle de vie de ce dernier. L’enjeu est la diminution de l’impact environnemental du produit. Afin que le concept d’écoconception soit suffisamment pris en compte par les entreprises, il est nécessaire de mettre en place des politiques européennes claires et cohérentes, d’augmenter la rapidité des processus réglementaires et d’augmenter la surveillance du marché dans les États membres. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Draft amending budget No 1/2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (C8-0181/2018) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Muresan sur la mobilisation du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union européenne (aide à la Grèce, à l’Espagne, à la France et au Portugal). Le FSUE a été mis en place par l’Union européenne afin de venir en aide aux États membres victimes de catastrophes naturelles. Au cours de l’année 2017, il y a eu un tremblement de terre en Grèce, des incendies de forêts en Espagne et au Portugal, et des ouragans en France. Il est primordial que les pays de l’Union européenne soient solidaires entre eux. J’ai ainsi voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière afin de venir en aide à la reconstruction des régions touchées par ces catastrophes naturelles.
2016/11/22
Interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making (A8-0170/2018 - Pavel Svoboda, Richard Corbett) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Svoboda sur l’interprétation et la mise en œuvre de l’accord interinstitutionnel «Mieux légiférer». Le Parlement européen, grâce à notamment l’Acte unique européen, partage un pouvoir législatif avec la Commission européenne. Ce rapport est donc primordial car il permet de rappeler les procédures législatives en mettant un ordre de priorité pour des dossiers, de définir un calendrier plus précis. Il rappelle également l’importance des principes tels que la transparence, l’indépendance et l’objectivité du comité d’examen de la réglementation. Il propose une méthode d’évaluation de l’incidence de la législation européenne sur les petites et moyennes entreprises, l’industrie locale et le grand public. L’Union européenne doit atteindre ces objectifs à un moindre coût. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy (A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Saifi sur la mise en œuvre de la politique commerciale commune (rapport annuel). La politique commerciale de l’Union européenne est garantie par de nombreux instruments législatifs et commerciaux. Il est cependant nécessaire de moderniser nos instruments afin de rester compétitifs sur le marché international. Ce rapport annuel permet de souligner que la politique commerciale doit garantir des conditions de concurrence justes, équitables et loyales. Il met ainsi une nouvelle méthode de calcul des droits anti-dumping. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Fishing mortality ranges and safeguard levels for certain herring stocks in the Baltic Sea (A8-0149/2018 - Alain Cadec) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Cadec concernant les fourchettes de mortalité par pêche et niveaux de sauvegarde pour certains stocks de hareng de la mer Baltique. Afin de pouvoir réaliser les objectifs de la politique commune de la pêche, mise en place afin de contrôler la pêche européenne et préserver les stocks de poissons, il est nécessaire de définir des fourchettes de mortalité. Les ressources halieutiques sont victimes d’une surexploitation, notamment liée à une augmentation de la consommation depuis plusieurs années. Il est donc important de définir des marges, afin de protéger ces ressources, en particulier certaines espèces de hareng de la mer Baltique. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Norway Agreement on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (A8-0147/2018 - Miguel Viegas) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Viegas sur l’accord entre l’Union européenne et la Norvège concernant la coopération administrative, la lutte contre la fraude et le recouvrement de créances dans le domaine de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée. La Norvège ne faisant pas partie de l’Union européenne, les fraudes sur la TVA sont nombreuses. Cependant, grâce à la similitude de nos systèmes de TVA, nous coopérons depuis plusieurs années afin de limiter ces fraudes. Ainsi, cet accord signé à Sofia début février 2018 n’est que l’officialisation de notre coopération. Il marque notre volonté d'améliorer notre partenariat notamment au niveau administratif. Ce rapport offre donc une bonne opportunité de créer un puissant réseau antifraude cohérent. Il fixe un cadre juridique, et c’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Optimisation of the value chain in the EU fishing sector (A8-0163/2018 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport AGUILERA sur l’optimisation de la chaîne de valeur dans le secteur de la pêche de l’Union européenne. L’optimisation de la chaîne de valeur est bénéfique pour savoir s’il faut externaliser par exemple une partie de l’activité. La pêche représente un secteur économique important pour l’Union européenne. Pour tirer le maximum de bénéfices, il est donc utile de décomposer chaque étape de l’activité, permettant d’analyser et de mesurer la valeur du produit à chaque moment du processus.Ce concept économique a cependant des limites. En effet, il est nécessaire que tous les acteurs concernés par la chaîne de valeur du secteur de la pêche se coordonnent afin de former un réseau cohérent. Il est nécessaire de développer et de moderniser les secteurs économiques européens, dont celui de la pêche, et cette modernisation passe par une optimisation de la chaîne de valeur. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Rodust concernant le plan pluriannuel pour les stocks démersaux de la mer du Nord et les pêcheries exploitant ces stocks. La pêche aux espèces démersales représente une activité à forte valeur ajoutée, engendrant une surexploitation de ces ressources. De plus, depuis quelques années, l’augmentation significative de la consommation des ressources halieutiques a contribué à cette surexploitation. Cependant, ces espèces se reproduisent lentement et sont considérées comme des ressources fragiles. Ce projet Rodust a ainsi pour objectif de garantir un rendement maximal durable, afin de limiter la surpêche et la pêche illicite. Il permet ainsi de prendre des mesures réglementaires de sauvegarde afin de protéger les espèces maritimes en établissant des mesures techniques de pêche écologique. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (A8-0319/2017 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Agnes Jongerius) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport MORIN-CHARTIER/JONGERIUS sur le détachement des travailleurs effectué dans le cadre d'une prestation de services. "A travail égal, salaire égal sur le même lieu de travail". Après 27 mois de travail sur la révision des travailleurs détachés, je nous félicite avec ma collègue de l'adoption en séance plénière. Elle permet de promouvoir une concurrence plus juste entre les Etats membres de l'Union européenne, et de prévenir du dumping. J'attends maintenant avec impatience la signature de l'accord.
2016/11/22
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Engström sur la zone de la convention de l’Organisation régionale de gestion des pêches du Pacifique Sud (ORGPPS) appliquant des mesures de gestion, de conservation et de contrôle. Depuis sa création en 2013, l’ORGPPS adopte tous les ans de nouvelles mesures, afin de toujours rester en cohérence avec les objectifs et les besoins actuels des zones de pêche du Pacifique Sud. Ces mesures soulignent l’importance de protéger et de garantir l’exploitation des ressources halieutiques. Ce rapport pose donc les principes de précaution et d’approche écosystémique de la gestion des pêches, qui sont en accord avec la politique commune de la pêche. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Sustainable finance (A8-0164/2018 - Molly Scott Cato) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Scott Cato sur la finance durable. Ce concept prend en compte les aspects extra-financiers de l’économie tels que l’environnement et le social. Elle regroupe essentiellement tous les instruments financiers du développement durable. En accord avec le rapport Brundtland, le développement durable est un développement répondant aux besoins du présent sans compromettre la capacité des générations futures de répondre aux leurs. Ainsi, afin de promouvoir le développement durable au sein de l’Union européenne et de maintenir les objectifs fixés lors des Accords de Paris (COP21) et de l’Agenda de 2030 de l’Organisation des Nations unies, il est important que les institutions financières participent à la transition climatique. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière afin d’inclure le concept de finance durable dans nos objectifs de développement durable.
2016/11/22
The 2017 EU Justice Scoreboard (A8-0161/2018 - Jytte Guteland) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Guteland concernant le tableau de bord 2017 de la justice dans l’Union européenne. Un système de justice doit promouvoir la croissance économique et défendre les droits fondamentaux des Hommes, donc l’état de droit d’un pays. Le tableau de bord de l’Union européenne a pour objectif d’aider les États membres à développer leur système judiciaire. Il permet donc d’évaluer la qualité, l’efficacité et l’indépendance des systèmes judiciaires des pays de l’Union européenne. Ce tableau de bord propose des solutions afin de mettre en place des systèmes judiciaires plus transparents et indépendants. Il ne s’agit pas de classer les États membres selon leur système juridique, mais de les aider afin d'améliorer leur système si nécessaire. C’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Protocol to the EU-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0104/2018 - Jozo Radoš) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Rados concernant le protocole à l’accord de partenariat et de coopération établissant un partenariat entre les Communautés européennes et leurs États membres, d’une part, et la République d’Ouzbékistan, d’autre part, visant à tenir compte de l’adhésion de la République de Croatie à l’Union européenne. La République de Croatie, désormais membre de l’Union européenne, doit se soumettre aux accords de l’Union européenne, considérant l’article 6, paragraphe 2 de l’acte d’adhésion de la République de Croatie. De plus, ce partenariat a pour objectif de prohiber le travail forcé, et notamment celui des enfants. Il permet également de créer un partenariat commercial centré sur le secteur des textiles. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Korea Framework Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0120/2018 - Tokia Saïfi) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Saïfi sur le projet de recommandation sur le projet de décision du Conseil relative à la conclusion, au nom de l’Union européenne et de ses États membres, d’une part, et la République de Corée, d’autre part, pour tenir compte de l’adhésion de la République de Croatie à l’Union européenne. La République de Croatie, désormais membre de l’Union européenne, doit se soumettre aux accords de l’Union européenne, considérant l’article 6, paragraphe 2 de l’acte d’adhésion de la République de Croatie. De plus, ce partenariat avec la République de Corée a permis de créer un lien de coopération avec un pays asiatique stratégique dans la région. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance ADB-CHMINACA to control measures (A8-0133/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz sur la soumission de la nouvelle substance psychoactive N-(1-amino-3.3-diméthyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl) -1 -(cyclohexylméthyl) -1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (ADB-CHMINACA) à des mesures de contrôle. La législation concernant les drogues diffère selon les États membres, c’est pourquoi il est nécessaire de mettre en place des règles strictes et rigoureuses dans ce domaine. Cette nouvelle substance psychoactive est addictive et entraîne un risque sanitaire important pour les États membres. C’est donc dans une optique de renforcement et d’amélioration de la lutte contre les drogues et les trafics de drogues que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures (A8-0134/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz sur la soumission de la nouvelle substance psychoactive 1-(4-cyanobutyl) - N-(2-phénylpropan-2-yl) - 1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (CUMYL-4CN-BINACA) à des mesures de contrôle. Cette nouvelle substance est considérée comme un substitut légal du cannabis disponible sur Internet. Il a été montré que cette substance présentait une toxicité potentiellement mortelle. En effet, elle a été responsable de plusieurs intoxications aiguës, voire de décès. Cette substance étant présente dans presque la moitié des États membres, je suis convaincue qu’il est nécessaire d’établir une réglementation plus rigoureuse et cohérente entre les États membres de l’Union européenne. C’est donc pour continuer le combat contre les drogues et le trafic de drogues que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0148/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gardiazabal Rubial sur la mobilisation du Fonds européen d’ajustement à la mondialisation (FEM), pour les licenciements dans le secteur des machines en Belgique. Le FEM est mis à disposition afin de fournir une aide aux travailleurs qui subissent d’importants changements du fait de la mondialisation. Concernant le secteur des machines en Belgique, il y a eu des délocalisations d’entreprises dans des pays émergents d’Amérique latine et d’Asie, où le marché est plus compétitif. Ces délocalisations ont engendré de nombreux licenciements. Les conditions pour débloquer le FEM étant respectées, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2016 on the protection of EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0135/2018 - Gilles Pargneaux) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Pargneaux sur le rapport annuel 2016 sur la protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne (lutte contre la fraude). Les ressources propres représentent la majorité des recettes de l’Union européenne, composées notamment des droits de douane et de la TVA. Cette dernière est une source croissante de recettes pour les États membres, mais elle est également concernée par les problématiques de fraude et d’évasion fiscale. De plus, la corruption est présente dans tous les États membres de l’Union européenne, et cette dernière représente un danger pour la démocratie et l’état de droit, qui sont deux traits importants de l’identité européenne. C’est donc dans une optique d’améliorer la transparence vis-à-vis des citoyens et de conforter leur confiance envers les institutions européennes que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2016 (A8-0139/2018 - Marco Valli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Valli sur le rapport annuel sur le contrôle des activités financières de la Banque Européenne d’Investissement (BEI) pour 2016. La BEI a notamment pour objectif de favoriser l’intégration et la cohésion économique et sociale au sein de l’Union européenne. Ces actionnaires étant les États membres de l’Union européenne, elle entretient des relations avec de nombreuses institutions européennes, mais elle reste tout de même indépendante. Ce rapport met en place les inquiétudes émises par les États membres, concernant notamment la définition de la stratégie équilibrée de la BEI sur les investissements faits aux États membres. Ce rapport souligne la nécessité de mettre en place des règles strictes et cohérentes afin d’éviter tout forme de corruption. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Cohesion policy and thematic objective ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ (A8-0136/2018 - Andrey Novakov) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Novakov sur la politique de cohésion et objectif thématique « Promouvoir le transport durable et supprimer les goulets d’étranglement dans les infrastructures de réseaux essentielles » - article 9, paragraphe 7 ; du règlement portant des dispositions communes. Ce rapport permet de mettre en avant la priorité d’investir dans les transports et les infrastructures. Il souligne le manque d’infrastructures dans les régions moins développées, montagneuses par exemple. Il explique qu’il est nécessaire de mettre en place des infrastructures de transport de base dans ces régions. J’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière car l’Union européenne a besoin d’une politique de cohésion forte, et cette dernière doit être cohérente à l’ensemble des territoires.
2016/11/22
Current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU (A8-0064/2018 - Esther Herranz García) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Herranz Garcia sur la situation actuelle et les perspectives d’avenir des secteurs ovin et caprin dans l’Union européenne. Ces deux secteurs sont victimes d’une faible rentabilité. Depuis quelques années, la population européenne consomme moins de viande. Ces secteurs sont également très dépendants des aides de la politique agricole commune (PAC). De plus, de nombreuses inquiétudes pèsent quant à la sortie du Royaume-Uni de l’Union européenne. En effet, ce dernier étant très présent sur le marché européen, sa sortie pourrait entraîner d’importantes perturbations. Néanmoins, les secteurs ovin et caprin possèdent une forte valeur ajoutée écologique. Ils permettent notamment de préserver la biodiversité. C’est donc pour venir en aide à ces secteurs et lui ménager des perspectives d’avenir que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (A8-0144/2018 - Barbara Spinelli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Spinelli sur le pluralisme et la liberté des médias dans l’Union européenne. Ce rapport permet de mettre en avant différents points importants pour la liberté et le pluralisme des médias. Tout d’abord, il énonce le danger des «fausses informations» et propose ainsi aux réseaux sociaux et autres sites internet de mettre en place des systèmes permettant aux utilisateurs de signaler ces potentielles informations afin de les soumettre à un organisme certifié. De plus, il souligne la nécessité de protéger les journalistes, notamment d’investigation. Il propose également d’accentuer les contrôles des financements publics à destination des médias. C’est donc dans l’optique d’améliorer la transparence et de permettre aux journalistes de réaliser leur mission d’information que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0056/2017 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Karins/Sargentini sur la prévention de l’utilisation du système financier à des fins de blanchiment d’argent ou de financement du terrorisme : la transparence des transactions financières et des organismes privés. Ce rapport vise à prévenir l’utilisation de mécanismes financiers à des fins de financement d’activités criminelles, mais aussi et surtout à renforcer les règles de transparence en matière de transactions financières. L’objectif étant de lutter contre la délinquance et la criminalité financière, sans que ces règles ne constituent un poids trop contraignant pour les entreprises. L’issue des négociations en trilogue entre le Parlement et le Conseil, suite au rapport voté en commissions ECON et LIBE au Parlement européen, a permis d’obtenir un texte équilibré, et qui aille dans le bon sens en matière de prévention de la criminalité financière, sans pour autant réduire de manière trop importante la liberté des entreprises dans leurs transactions.
2016/11/22
Organic production and labelling of organic products (A8-0311/2015 - Martin Häusling) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Häusling sur la production biologique et l’étiquetage des produits biologiques. Ce rapport vise à soutenir le développement de l’agriculture biologique tout en remédiant aux critiques parfois soulevées quant aux systèmes de contrôle de cette agriculture. Le soutien aux modes de production biologiques est nécessaire et fait partie des grands objectifs politiques de l’Union.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national Parliaments (A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Rangel sur la mise en œuvre des normes issues du Traité de Lisbonne concernant les parlements nationaux. Ce rapport vise à évaluer l’efficacité et le bien-fondé des différents mécanismes de participation des parlements nationaux à la prise de décision et au processus législatif au niveau européen, tout en établissant des propositions afin de développer de manière plus accrue cette participation des parlements nationaux. C’est selon moi une bonne chose, car ces mécanismes étendent et affirment la légitimité démocratique des décisions prises par le législateur qu’est le Parlement européen. Ce rapport va par ailleurs dans le bon sens en établissant une série de propositions afin de renforcer ces mécanismes, tels que des débats plus réguliers avec les représentants respectifs des gouvernements nationaux, ou encore la création d’une semaine annuelle européenne pour que les députés européens et les Commissaires puissent se rendre devant les Parlement nationaux.
2016/11/22
Annual Report on Competition Policy (A8-0049/2018 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel sur la politique de concurrence de l’Union. En effet, la Commission européenne publie chaque année un rapport sur sa politique en matière de concurrence. Ce texte constitue la réponse et l’expression du Parlement vis-à-vis de ce rapport annuel, en l’espèce pour l’année 2016. Ceci constitue selon moi une bonne chose, puisque ce rapport participe à l’exercice de contrôle du Parlement sur les actions menées par la Commission européenne, tout en établissant des propositions d’évolutions et de mesures pour les années à venir. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the European Protection Order Directive (A8-0065/2018 - Soraya Post, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Jimenez-Becerril sur la mise en œuvre de la directive 2011/99/EU relative à la décision de protection européenne. Cette directive visait à harmoniser les mécanismes de protection des victimes dans le cadre d’affaires criminelles, afin de permettre une meilleure reconnaissance mutuelle de ces décisions entre les différents pays européens, notamment dans le cas d’affaires présentant un caractère transfrontalier. Ce rapport vise donc à évaluer la mise en œuvre de cette directive, ce qui va selon moi dans le bon sens puisqu’il nous appartient, non seulement d’écrire le droit européen, mais aussi d’être les garants de la bonne application de ce dernier, afin de garantir son utilité au service des citoyens européens. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Bonafé sur les emballages et les déchets d’emballages: efficacité d’utilisation des ressources (paquet «économie circulaire»). L’économie circulaire appelle à une consommation responsable des matières premières primaires ainsi qu’à la prévention de la production de déchets. En adoptant une économie circulaire, l’Union européenne deviendrait également plus compétitive sur la scène mondiale. Ce rapport fixe ainsi des objectifs de recyclage des déchets d’emballage d’ici 2025 et 2030. Tout ceci va, selon moi, dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport BONAFE sur les véhicules hors d’usage et accumulateurs et déchets de piles et accumulateurs; déchets d’équipements électriques et électroniques; efficacité d’utilisation des ressources (paquet Économie circulaire). L’objectif de ce dernier est de stimuler la transition de l’économie vers une économie circulaire, ce qui engendrera un gain de compétitivité, favorisera une croissance économique durable et générera de nouveaux emplois. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport BONAFE sur les déchets : efficacité d’utilisation des ressources (Paquet Économie circulaire). Les ressources étant limitées, il est important de promouvoir une économie plus circulaire, permettant de maximiser l’utilisation de ces ressources. En modifiant notre économie, l’Union européenne va ainsi gagner en compétitivité, en devenant moins dépendante des importations de ressources. Ce rapport établit en particulier des objectifs fixes quant à la réduction des déchets, ainsi qu’un plan de management sur le long terme pour piloter une économie plus circulaire. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Bonafe sur la mise en décharge des déchets: efficacité d’utilisation des ressources (Paquet Économie circulaire). Pendant longtemps, il n’y avait aucun contrôle sur la mise en décharge et l’enfouissement des déchets. Ceci a engendré une pollution importante, notamment des sols. Ce rapport introduit donc une interdiction d’enfouissement des déchets collectés séparément ainsi qu’une limitation des déchets municipaux enfouis à 10% d’ici 2030. Cette initiative va permettre de réduire la pollution des sols, ce qui aura une incidence sur de nombreux secteurs, notamment agricoles. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting (A8-0253/2017 - Francesc Gambús) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gambús sur les rapports sur l’environnement: règles de procédure. Ce rapport vise à supprimer des références légales obsolètes en matière d’obligations de rapports dans le domaine environnemental. Ces références proviennent de la directive dite «SRD» de 1991, et sont maintenant devenues pour beaucoup obsolètes suite à l’évolution du droit européen en matière environnementale. Il est toujours bon d’œuvrer à la clarté, la lisibilité, et l’accessibilité du droit européen, d’autant plus dans des secteurs aussi importants que celui de l’environnement, et ce rapport va donc pour moi dans le bon sens en éliminant ces références obsolètes de notre législation. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0141/2018 - Mady Delvaux) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Delvaux sur les rapports annuels 2015-2016 sur la subsidiarité et la proportionnalité. Ce rapport vise à évaluer la bonne application, par les institutions européennes, des deux principes fondateurs que sont la proportionnalité et la subsidiarité, et qui figurent dans les traités européens. L’année 2015 était par ailleurs la première année pleine de la Commission Juncker, ce qui fut d’autant plus l’occasion d’évaluer l’importance octroyée à la subsidiarité par cette Commission, qui avait déclaré vouloir en faire une priorité politique. Il s’agit là du contrôle du bon fonctionnement démocratique des institutions européennes, qui a pu aboutir à un rapport équilibré et satisfaisant. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge (A8-0130/2018 - Joachim Zeller) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la décharge du budget général de l’UE sur la Commission européenne, et les rapports spéciaux de la Cour des comptes européenne dans le contexte de la décharge de la Commission européenne pour l’exercice budgétaire de l’année 2016. Ce rapport vise à évaluer et à approuver ou non la gestion financière de ces institutions au titre de l’année financière 2016. Tout en proposant l’approbation, ce rapport établit toute une série de propositions, parmi lesquelles par exemple en soutenant le fait pour la Commission et les États membres de coordonner leurs objectifs de politiques publiques, ou de rendre au Parlement européen une évaluation à mi-mandat de la situation financière passée et présente du budget octroyé à la Commission européenne pour la réalisation de ses objectifs.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0123/2018 - Barbara Kappel) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la décharge sur le budget général de l’UE concernant les 8e, 9e, 10e et 11e Fonds européens de développement pour l’exercice comptable de l’année 2016. Ce rapport vise à évaluer et approuver la gestion budgétaire de ces différents fonds de développement pour l’année financière 2016. Ce rapport fut également l’occasion d‘établir des recommandations pour améliorer cette gestion budgétaire, par exemple concernant les systèmes de contrôles internes à ces fonds, ou le recouvrement de préfinancements non-dépensés. Cependant, la gestion financière de ces fonds sur l’année 2016 est tout à fait légale et respectueuse des règles de procédure, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de l’octroi de cette décharge pour les 8e, 9e, 10e et 11e Fonds de Développement européens.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0105/2018 - Derek Vaughan) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vaughan sur la décharge du Parlement européen pour l’année financière 2016. Ce rapport visait à évaluer et donner décharge au Parlement européen pour sa gestion financière sur l’exercice comptable de l’année 2016. Ce rapport fut également l’occasion d’établir certaines propositions pour améliorer la gestion financière de cette institution. Néanmoins, ce rapport ne doit concerner que l’année financière 2016, c’est pourquoi j’ai voté contre des amendements qui s’écartaient de cette règle, et qui pour certains se recoupaient avec les travaux qui sont menés en ce moment par le groupe de travail dont je suis membre sur l’indemnité des frais généraux. Enfin, j’ai voté avec mes collègues de la délégation française PPE contre les amendements qui pourraient se révéler préjudiciables à la localisation du siège du Parlement européen à Strasbourg. J’ai cependant bien entendu voté en faveur du rapport dans son ensemble.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2016: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0115/2018 - Bart Staes) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Staes sur la décharge à la mise en œuvre du budget des agences de l’Union européenne pour l’exercice budgétaire de 2016: performance, gestion financière et contrôle. Ce rapport vise à évaluer et valider l’exercice budgétaire de 2016 des agences de l’Union européenne, tout en établissant des propositions pour améliorer leur bon fonctionnement financier à l’avenir, comme par exemple l’harmonisation des systèmes d’information pour la gestion des ressources humaines, ou encore les mécanismes de contrôle d’efficience financière au sein de ces agences. Le rapport propose à juste titre d'octroyer la décharge à chacune des agences concernées, ce pour quoi j’ai voté lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Lebanon Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0352/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Sakorafa sur l’accord de coopération scientifique et technologique UE/Liban: conditions et modalités de la participation du Liban au partenariat en matière de recherche et d’innovation dans la zone méditerranéenne (PRIMA). Ce partenariat regroupe actuellement 19 pays. L’ouverture de ce partenariat à un pays tiers tel que le Liban est compatible avec les défis et permet de soutenir les politiques extérieures de l’Union européenne. La participation du Liban à ce partenariat est en concordance avec les politiques de migration, de développement et de voisinage de l’Union européenne. C’est parce que PRIMA va pouvoir trouver des solutions pour une future gestion durable des systèmes hydriques et agro-alimentaires que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0053/2018 - Norica Nicolai) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de NICOLAI sur l’accord de partenariat de pêche entre l’Union européenne et Maurice: possibilités de pêche et contrepartie financière 2017-2021 (protocole). L’Union européenne et l’île Maurice montrent d’après ce rapport leur volonté d’intensifier leurs relations, notamment par la promotion d’une exploitation durable des ressources halieutiques. Le précédent protocole avait pu bénéficier aux deux parties, où l’Union européenne a pu disposer d’un cadre plus stable. C’est donc dans l’optique de poursuivre ces relations pour une période supplémentaire de quatre ans que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Norway Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0126/2018 - Tiziana Beghin) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Beghin sur l’accord sous forme d’échange de lettres entre l’Union européenne et le Royaume de Norvège concernant l’octroi de préférences commerciales supplémentaires pour des produits agricoles. La Norvège n’étant pas membre de l’Union européenne, il reste important de conserver et d’intensifier nos relations notamment économiques avec ce pays tiers. Ce rapport permet d’établir des contingents tarifaires sur de nombreux produits, qu’ils soient en provenance de la Norvège ou bien de l’Union européenne. C’est donc avec un objectif de renforcement et d’amélioration de notre coopération que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
A European strategy for the promotion of protein crops (A8-0121/2018 - Jean-Paul Denanot) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Denanot sur la stratégie européenne pour la promotion des cultures protéagineuses, afin d’encourager la production de protéagineuses et de légumineuses dans le secteur agricole européen. L’Union européenne continue d’avoir un déficit important de protéines végétales. Les protéines sont au centre des enjeux de la sécurité alimentaire, de l’environnement et du réchauffement climatique. Elles sont indispensables à la vie et présentes partout. Compte tenu de la dépendance de l’Union européenne quant aux matières premières, le transport de ces dernières ont ainsi occasionné des dégâts pour l’environnement et le climat. Il est donc important de promouvoir ces protéines et ces cultures au sein de l’Union européenne, et ainsi diminuer les importations. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport LINS sur le cadre d’action pour le climat et l’énergie à l’horizon 2030: prise en compte des émissions et des absorptions de gaz à effet de serre résultant de l’utilisation des terres, du changement d’affectation des terres et de la foresterie. Ce dernier pose des règles comptables et fixe un objectif à chaque État membre en matière d’émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Cette proposition a pour but de renforcer la capacité des forêts et des sols à capter le CO2 durablement, et propose une règle du bilan neutre ou positif, qui impose à chaque État membre de veiller à ce que leurs émissions de CO2 soient compensées par des absorptions équivalentes de CO2 présents dans l’atmosphère. Cette proposition est parfaitement en adéquation avec les engagements pris lors de l’Accord de Paris, c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gerbrandy sur les réductions annuelles contraignantes des émissions de gaz à effet de serre par les États membres de 2021 à 2030. Afin d’atteindre l’objectif fixé d’une réduction de 40% par rapport à 1990, il est nécessaire de mettre en œuvre des politiques plus contraignantes pour les États membres. Cette proposition va ainsi permettre à l’Union européenne d’affirmer ses engagements lors de l’Accord de Paris. Elle permet de fixer des contributions minimales des États membres aux réductions des émissions de la période allant de 2021 à 2030. De plus, elle établit des règles de détermination pour les quotas annuels d’émission ainsi que pour calculer les progrès réalisés. Ce rapport poursuit clairement l’objectif d’effectuer une transition vers une économie à plus faible intensité de carbone, c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A8-0373/2017 - Mercedes Bresso, Rainer Wieland) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Wieland/Bresso sur le statut et le financement des partis politiques européens et des fondations politiques européennes. Dans la démocratie européenne représentative, les partis politiques jouent un rôle majeur car ils représentent les citoyens. Ce rapport a pour objectif de modifier le règlement européen datant de 2014 auquel sont soumis les partis et les fondations politiques européens. Ce rapport met en avant différents changements. Tout d’abord, ce rapport propose un abaissement du seuil de cofinancement considérant la difficulté de certains partis et fondations à l’atteindre. De plus, une personne ne pourra être membre que d’un seul parti politique européen, afin d’éviter une utilisation abusive des deniers européens. Enfin, toujours dans un souci de transparence, ce rapport permet aux citoyens européens d’affilier un parti politique national à un parti politique européen. C’est donc pour tous ces changements menant à une meilleure transparence que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Energy performance of buildings (A8-0314/2017 - Bendt Bendtsen) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport ‘ sur la performance énergétique des bâtiments. Ces derniers seraient responsables d’environ 40% de la performance énergétique de l’Union européenne, ainsi que de 36% des émissions. Toujours dans les objectifs climatiques de 2030, l’amélioration de la performance énergétique des bâtiments permettrait à l’Union de procéder à une transition économiquement plus rationnelle et de réduire de 5% ses émissions de CO2. Ceci va selon moi dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Gender equality in the media sector in the EU (A8-0031/2018 - Michaela Šojdrová) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport ŠOJDROVÁ sur l’égalité des genres dans le secteur des médias au sein de l’Union européenne. Plusieurs fois, le Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel a fait remarquer une inégalité dans la répartition des postes dans le secteur des médias. Ce manque de parité renforce les stéréotypes et les clichés présents à propos des femmes dans les médias. En effet, on remarque par exemple que peu de femmes sont invitées en tant qu’expertes sur des plateaux par comparaison aux hommes. On note également un manque de parité dans la hiérarchie des médias, où les femmes ne sont que peu représentées. Je suis convaincue du bien-fondé de cette initiative, car il nous appartient d’œuvrer à l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes. C’est pourquoi, j’ai sans aucune hésitation voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (A8-0129/2018 - Charles Goerens) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport GOERENS sur l’amélioration de la soutenabilité de la dette des pays en développement. Les objectifs de développement durable pris par l’Union européenne ne pourront être atteints qu’à condition que l’Union contribue à rendre la dette des pays en développement plus soutenable. Ce rapport recommande notamment une stratégie de lutte contre l’endettement excessif des pays en développement. Il recommande également une mise en œuvre d’une politique de prêts co-responsable entre créditeurs et prêteurs. Ce rapport met en jeu des instruments qui devraient contraindre les acteurs, notamment lors d’achats de dettes par des « fonds vautours ». Ce rapport permet donc de fixer un cadre législatif en posant les droits, devoirs et responsabilités de tous les acteurs impliqués. C’est donc pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0138/2018 - Marc Joulaud) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport JOULAUD sur le renforcement de la cohésion économique, sociale et territoriale au sein de l’Union européenne (septième rapport de la Commission européenne). Malgré une réduction des disparités régionales au sein de l’Union européenne, de nombreuses inégalités se maintiennent, voire augmentent. De forts contrastes sont toujours présents, notamment au niveau du taux de chômage au sein des États membres. Ce rapport propose donc un renforcement de la politique de cohésion économique, sociale et territoriale au sein de l’Union européenne, visant à promouvoir un développement équilibré au sein de l’Union européenne. C’est dans une logique de solidarité et avec un objectif de croissance durable, et de réduction des disparités, que j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (A8-0058/2018 - João Ferreira) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ferreira sur la dénonciation de l’accord de partenariat CE/Comores dans le secteur de la pêche. Ce rapport vise à dénoncer l’accord de partenariat dans le secteur de la pêche régissant les relations entre l’Union européenne et les Comores. En effet, les autorités comoriennes étant impliquées dans des activités de pêche illicites, non déclarées et non réglementées, les Comores ont été introduites sur la liste des pays non coopérants. Les autorités comoriennes n’ayant pas réagi pour corriger cette situation, la décision fut prise de dénoncer l’accord de partenariat avec les Comores, tout en établissant une série de propositions visant à continuer à apporter un soutien aux conditions de pêche dans les Comores. Il me paraît tout à fait logique de réagir lorsqu’un partenaire commercial de l’Union n’exécute pas sa part du contrat, voire se livre à des activités illicites et préjudiciables: j’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Europass: framework for skills and qualifications (A8-0244/2017 - Thomas Mann, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mann/Malinov sur de meilleurs services pour les compétences et les qualifications (Europass). Ce rapport vise à proposer des améliorations et des pistes de réforme pour la plateforme Europass, qui fournit des services en ligne aux citoyens européens en matière de qualifications professionnelles et d’orientation sur le marché du travail. L’emploi est une de mes priorités et il est de notre devoir que de tout faire pour favoriser l’entrée ainsi que le maintien dans l’emploi, ce qui passe, entre autres, par des plateformes comme Europass au niveau européen. Ce rapport va donc pour moi dans le bon sens, et c’est pour cette raison que j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (A8-0063/2018 - Giovanni La Via) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport La Via sur le lieu du siège de l’Agence Européenne du Médicament (AEM). L’Agence Européenne du Médicament étant jusqu’à présent localisée à Londres, il a été décidé le 29 novembre dernier de relocaliser cette agence dans une autre ville européenne suite à la décision du Royaume-Uni de quitter l’Union. La ville retenue par les chefs d’États membres réunis au Conseil, et proposée par la suite par la Commission, fut Amsterdam. Ce rapport présente la position du Parlement vis-à-vis de cette proposition. La relocalisation à Amsterdam n’y est pas remise en cause, et un certain nombre de propositions y sont faites afin de gérer au mieux les conséquences budgétaires et en termes de ressources humaines de cette relocalisation. Il est de notre devoir de faire en sorte que le déplacement de cette Agence puisse se faire de la manière la plus efficace possible, pour garantir le bon fonctionnement et le caractère opérationnel de l’Agence Européenne du Médicament, d’ici son installation définitive dans ses nouveaux bâtiments à Amsterdam. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (A8-0051/2018 - Alain Lamassoure) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de mon collègue Alain Lamassoure sur une assiette commune consolidée pour l’impôt sur les sociétés (ACCIS). Ce rapport vise à assurer le bon fonctionnement du marché intérieur en le rendant plus résistant aux systèmes d’évasion fiscale, tout en favorisant le commerce et l’investissement.Il s’agit ici de simplifier le système d’impôt sur les sociétés au niveau européen, tout en l’harmonisant afin de le rendre plus juste: c’est ici uniquement le système qui est visé, et non pas les taux d’imposition, qui sont de la compétence de chaque État membre. La question de l’harmonisation fiscale est essentielle pour approfondir l’intégration au sein de l’Union européenne, et bien qu’elle soit délicate, elle doit tenir lieu d’objectif vers lequel tendre dans les années à venir. C’est précisément ce que ce propose de faire ce rapport, en établissant une série de propositions afin de réformer et d’harmoniser le système d’impôt sur les sociétés via la création d’une assiette commune au niveau européen, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Further macro-financial assistance to Georgia (A8-0028/2018 - Hannu Takkula) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Takkula sur l’assistance macrofinancière supplémentaire à destination de la Géorgie. Ce rapport vise à exprimer la position du Parlement européen quant à la proposition de la Commission européenne d’assister financièrement, à hauteur d’un prêt de 35 millions d’euros, la République de Géorgie. C’est la troisième fois depuis 2008 qu’une telle proposition est émise, et si la situation économique en Géorgie s’est améliorée depuis, cette dernière reste tout de même encore vulnérable. Cette proposition de prêt est équilibrée, avec des garanties en faveur de l’Union européenne, et un contrôle régulier de l’utilisation qui sera faite des deniers publics européens. De plus, bien que la Géorgie ne soit pas un état membre de l’UE, cette dernière est dans notre voisinage direct, et il est aussi dans notre intérêt de s’assurer de la stabilité économique et politique des états qui se trouvent à nos frontières. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce texte en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 (A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Olbrycht/Thomas sur la préparation de la position du Parlement européen sur le cadre financier pluriannuel (CFP) post-2020. Ce rapport vise à établir les bases de la position du Parlement européen concernant le prochain cadre financier pluriannuel (CFP), ainsi que sur le cadre législatif concernant le système de ressources propres. Il y est par ailleurs précisé que les négociations sur le prochain CFP devront aller de pair avec les discussions sur les ressources propres.Ce rapport propose par ailleurs que la décision sur le CFP post-2020 soit prise avant la fin de cette mandature, pour que tous les programmes financés puissent être opérationnels dès 2021. De plus, ce rapport propose un maintien des financements de la PAC et de la politique de cohésion, avec des augmentations concernant les programmes Erasmus +, Initiative pour l’emploi des jeunes, Life, et le programme de soutien aux PME. Tout ceci est selon moi tout à fait positif, car ce sont là des programmes essentiels pour faire exister l’Europe auprès des citoyens, de manière concrète et positive. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Lewandowski/Deprez sur la réforme du système de ressources propres de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport vise à exprimer la position du Parlement européen sur la réforme proposée du système de ressources propres, en vue de l’établissement du prochain Cadre Financier Pluriannuel (CFP) post-2020. Ce rapport propose que les deux sources de ressources propres de l’Union européenne soient maintenues, à savoir les ressources propres traditionnelles via les taxes telles que la TVA, ainsi que le système de contribution en fonction du Revenu National Brut de chaque état membre. Avoir un système de ressources propres est fondamental pour avoir une Europe qui fonctionne, une Europe qui soit pérenne et indépendante financièrement. Je suis convaincue que les propositions contenues dans ce rapport vont dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en leur faveur lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0047/2018 - Hugues Bayet) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Bayet sur le Semestre européen pour la coordination des politiques économiques: examen annuel de la croissance 2018. Ce rapport constitue la réponse du Parlement à l’examen annuel de la croissance pour 2018, présenté par la Commission européenne au mois de novembre dernier. Ce rapport, qui fut équilibré par les compromis qui ont pu être dégagés entre les huit groupes politiques présents au Parlement européen, établit une série de propositions et d’analyses sur les ressorts de la croissance en Europe sans pour autant se limiter à une analyse purement économique, mais en y incluant également des facteurs sociaux ou environnementaux, par exemple. Il apparaît évident qu’il est de notre devoir de tout faire pour que l’Europe puisse bénéficier d’une croissance économique stable et pérenne, et c’est ce vers quoi tend ce rapport.
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0052/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Hetman sur le Semestre européen pour la coordination des politiques économiques: emploi et aspects sociaux de l’examen annuel de la croissance 2018. Ce rapport constitue la réponse du Parlement européen à l’examen annuel de la croissance pour 2018, présenté par la Commission européenne au mois de novembre dernier, en ce qui concerne ses aspects sociaux.Ce rapport établit une série de propositions pour lesquelles je suis convaincue qu’elles vont dans le bon sens, en insistant sur l’importance de réformes structurelles des marchés du travail, de la qualité des systèmes éducatifs et d’apprentissage, et du potentiel que peuvent présenter les PME en matière de création d’emploi et de formation. La croissance et l’emploi en Europe sont deux objectifs vers lesquels nous devons absolument tendre: ce rapport va clairement dans ce sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A8-0034/2018 - Jean Arthuis) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Arthuis sur le protocole relatif aux conséquences financières de l’expiration du Traité sur la CECA et au Fonds de recherche sur le charbon et l’acier. Le Fonds de recherche sur le charbon et l’acier a été mis en place après l’expiration du Traité établissant la Communauté européenne du charbon et de l’acier, dans l’objectif de financer la recherche dans ce secteur, via des investissements non-risqués réalisés par la Commission européenne. Ce rapport, principalement politique, vise à régler les conséquences budgétaires consécutives à l’expiration de ce traité, tout en augmentant la dotation de ce fonds de recherche, ce qui est tout-à-fait positif. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-New Zealand agreement on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (A8-0029/2018 - Daniel Caspary) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Caspary sur l’accord entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande sur la coopération et l’assistance administrative mutuelle en matière de douanes. Cet accord, signé le 3 juillet 2017, nécessite maintenant l’approbation du Parlement européen pour entrer en vigueur. Il vise entre autres à soutenir la coopération et l’assistance administrative mutuelle dans l’objectif de favoriser le commerce et d’assurer la sécurité des chaînes de production et d’échange. Cet accord est selon moi tout-à-fait bénéfique pour l’UE comme pour la Nouvelle-Zélande, puisqu’il favorisera le commerce ainsi que les échanges entre les deux zones, tout en réduisant la charge administrative douanière qui pèse actuellement sur ces échanges, ce qui sera donc à terme favorable à l’économie européenne comme à l’économie néo-zélandaise. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (A8-0036/2018 - István Ujhelyi) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ujhelyi sur la stratégie européenne sur les systèmes de transport intelligents et coopératifs. Ce rapport constitue la réponse du Parlement à l’initiative sur le Système coopératif et intelligent de transport (C-ITS) présenté en novembre 2016 par la Commission européenne. Ce système permet de tirer profit des avancées en matière de numérique et de technologies digitales en les appliquant au secteur du transport, ce qui représente une avancée considérable pour le secteur du transport. Le transport est un secteur absolument essentiel pour l’économie du marché intérieur européen, et il est indispensable que ce dernier entre pleinement, à son tour, dans la modernité et l’ère digitale. Il nous appartient en tant que législateurs européens de soutenir ces avancées, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Cross-border parcel delivery services (A8-0315/2017 - Lucy Anderson) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Anderson sur les services de livraison transfrontalière de colis. Ce rapport vise à améliorer le fonctionnement des services de livraison transfrontalière de colis, dans l’objectif de tirer pleinement profit des possibilités offertes par le marché intérieur européen en ce qui concerne la livraison transfrontalière de biens. Il s’agit donc ici d’améliorer l’efficacité et la flexibilité au sein du marché intérieur dans le cadre de la livraison de colis, ce qui sera bénéfique à tous les consommateurs et citoyens européens. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Gender equality in EU trade agreements (A8-0023/2018 - Eleonora Forenza, Malin Björk) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Forenza/Björk sur l’égalité des genres dans les accords commerciaux de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport vise à attirer l’attention sur les conséquences différenciées en fonction du sexe que peuvent avoir certains accords commerciaux de l’Union européenne. Il établit des propositions afin de réduire autant que faire se peut ces conséquences différenciées et rendre les accords commerciaux de l’Union aussi neutres que possible vis-à-vis du genre ou du sexe des personnes. Ce rapport se félicite également de la nomination d’une personne de contact sur les questions d’égalité des sexes au sein de la direction générale du commerce de la Commission européenne. Ayant moi-même toujours été très engagée sur les questions d’égalité entre les sexes, j’ai bien entendu voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
The role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP 21 Paris Agreement on climate change (A8-0045/2018 - Ángela Vallina) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vallina sur le rôle des régions de l’Union européenne et des villes dans l’application de l’accord de Paris de la COP 21 sur le changement climatique. Ce rapport vise à impliquer les régions, villes et autres collectivités locales dans la mise en application de l’accord de Paris sur le changement climatique. La bonne application de l’accord de Paris est indispensable au vu des enjeux colossaux auxquels nous sommes confrontés en matière climatique et environnementale, et il semble à ce titre tout-à-fait logique d’impliquer les différents niveaux territoriaux dans l’application de cet accord. De plus, les négociations entre les différents groupes politiques ont permis d’aboutir à un rapport équilibré à l’issue de son vote en commission, et c’est pour ces raisons que j’ai voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Insurance distribution: date of application of Member States' transposition measures (A8-0024/2018 - Werner Langen) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Langen sur la directive relative à la distribution de produits d’assurance, et la date d’application des mesures de transposition des États membres. Ce rapport vise à assurer l’application effective de la directive (UE) 2016/97 sur la distribution de produits d’assurance, qui harmonise ce secteur, en adaptant les normes de réglementation de manière à ce que ces dernières soient plus adaptées aux réalités de ce secteur.La bonne application et la lisibilité du droit européen sont primordiales pour que ce droit soit respecté et puisse servir tous les citoyens européens. Puisque c’est précisément cette bonne application que ce rapport entend garantir, j’ai voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-USA Bilateral Agreement on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (A8-0008/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de l’accord bilatéral Union européenne/États-Unis sur les mesures prudentielles relatives à l’assurance et à la réassurance. Ce rapport vise à permettre la conclusion d’un accord entre ces deux parties en matière d’assurance et de réassurance, notamment concernant l’échange d’informations entre les différentes autorités de supervision en matière d’assurance. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le sens d’une collaboration accrue entre ces deux zones majeures en matière économique et financière, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (A8-0021/2018 - Pilar Ayuso) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ayuso sur les boissons spiritueuses: définition, présentation et étiquetage; utilisation des noms dans la présentation et étiquetage d’autres denrées alimentaires; protection des indications géographiques. Ce rapport vise à aligner la législation européenne sur les spiritueux avec le droit issu du traité de Lisbonne, ce qui est une bonne chose, car cela garantit l’application effective et la lisibilité du droit applicable aux entreprises et aux exploitants exerçant dans le domaine des boissons spiritueuses. Ce rapport propose également certains changements techniques mineurs, mais qui pouvaient se révéler défavorables aux producteurs français. C’est pourquoi nous avons, au cas par cas et avec mes collègues français du groupe PPE, voté contre certains rares amendements pouvant être préjudiciables à nos producteurs. J’ai cependant bien sûr voté en faveur de ce texte dans sa globalité.
2016/11/22
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Maurel sur l’échange automatique et obligatoire d’informations en matière de fiscalité en rapport avec les dispositifs transfrontaliers faisant l’objet d’une déclaration. Ce rapport vise à élargir le champ des obligations de transmission d’information aux autorités fiscales de la part des sociétés privées effectuant des activités d’optimisation fiscale. Ce contrôle accru et facilité permettra à l’Union européenne et aux États membres de lutter plus efficacement contre l’évasion fiscale et les montages fiscaux réalisés dans l’objectif unique d’échapper à la charge de l’impôt. C’est donc un rapport positif, qui renforce nos capacités de contrôle et de lutte contre la fraude et l’évasion fiscales, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (A8-0025/2018 - Frank Engel) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Engel sur le rapport annuel sur la situation des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne en 2016. Bien que l’Europe soit l’un des continents les plus avancés en matière de droits de l’homme, des progrès peuvent, et doivent, toujours être faits dans ce domaine, notamment dans certains états membres de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport annuel, en plus de faire état de la situation actuelle des droits de l’homme au sein de notre Union, propose des recommandations dans l’objectif d’améliorer leur respect et leur bonne application, pour que chacun des citoyens européen puisse en bénéficier. J’ai également voté en faveur de l’amendement contre les thérapies de conversion pour les personnes homosexuelles, afin de limiter le plus possible ces pratiques discriminatoires envers une partie de notre population. Ce rapport est donc primordial, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector (A8-0014/2018 - Norbert Erdős) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Erdos sur les perspectives et défis pour le secteur apicole européen. Contribuant à hauteur de presque 15 milliards d’euros au PIB de l’Union européenne, le secteur apicole apparaît comme essentiel à notre économie, et la production de miel représente, au niveau local, une source non négligeable de dynamisme et de revenus pour certains départements, certaines régions et zone rurales. Cependant, suite à l’introduction de miel de plus faible qualité dans le marché intérieur européen, parfois de manière illégale, les prix du miel continuent de chuter, plaçant les apiculteurs dans une situation trop souvent intenable. C’est ce à quoi ce rapport se propose de remédier, en adaptant les normes spécifiques à ce secteur pour limiter le plus possible l’entrée dans le marché intérieur de faux miel exerçant une concurrence déloyale à l’encontre du secteur apicole européen. Ce rapport préconise également une augmentation des fonds alloués aux programmes nationaux de protection des abeilles. C’est donc un rapport tout-à-fait positif, et pour lequel j’ai voté en session plénière.
2016/11/22
Banking Union - Annual Report 2017 (A8-0019/2018 - Sander Loones) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Loones sur le rapport annuel 2017 de l’union bancaire. Ce texte, tout en établissant un rapport sur la situation actuelle de l’union bancaire, effectue également toute une série de propositions afin d’en améliorer le fonctionnement, et d’assurer la bonne application du droit européen et des traités en matière bancaire. C’est un rapport qui a été soutenu par mon groupe politique, le PPE, en commission des affaires économiques et monétaires, et qui va pour moi globalement dans un sens positif: c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Cutting the sources of income for Jihadists - targeting the financing of terrorism (A8-0035/2018 - Javier Nart) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Nart concernant une recommandation au Conseil, à la Commission et au SEAE sur les sources de revenus des djihadistes, et le ciblage du financement du terrorisme. Le terrorisme est un enjeu global, auquel tous les états sont à présent confrontés, et qui menace la sécurité de nos concitoyens. Il n’est pas possible de lutter contre le terrorisme sans lutter contre ses sources de financement. C’est ce que se propose de faire ce rapport, en s’attaquant aux divers mécanismes de financement utilisés par les organisations terroristes, et en luttant contre ces derniers via la transmission d’informations, la coopération, et la collaboration, entre les autorités de sécurité nationales de chaque État membre. Ce rapport recommande également d’utiliser les informations détenues par les banques et institutions financières pour mieux contrôler les flux financiers illicites qui pourraient servir à des fins terroristes. Puisque la sécurité de nos concitoyens doit être notre priorité, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors du vote en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0022/2018 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Ángela Vallina) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vallina de la Noval/Bilbao Barandica sur la recommandation au Conseil quant aux priorités européennes pour la soixante-deuxième session de la Commission sur la condition de la femme de l’ONU. Ce rapport vise à établir des conditions générales pour garantir l’émancipation des femmes et des filles, tout en restant lié au thème de cette soixante-deuxième session de la Commission de la femme de l’ONU, qui est la ruralité. Des problématiques particulières peuvent en effet toucher les femmes habitant en zones rurales, et ce rapport propose des recommandations afin de favoriser le plus possible l’émancipation de ces femmes dans les situations particulières qui peuvent les affecter. La condition des femmes et l’égalité des sexes a toujours été l’un de mes plus fervents combats, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de cette recommandation en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (A8-0135/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gardiazabal Rubial sur le fonds de garantie pour les actions extérieures et la garantie de l’Union pour la Banque européenne d’investissement (BEI) face aux pertes dues au financement d’opérations en soutien de l’investissement dans des projets hors de l’Union. Ce rapport vise à améliorer le cadre législatif relatif aux investissements de la BEI hors du territoire de l’Union, ce qui n’est pas anodin, puisque ces investissements représentent 10 % de l’activité totale de l’institution en matière de financement de projets. Ainsi, ce rapport augmente les fonds dédiés à ces investissements hors de l’Union, qui passent d’un plafond à 27 milliards pour la période 2014-2020 à un plafond à 32,3 milliards dorénavant. Ce rapport comporte également des dispositifs visant à rendre l’activité hors Union de la BEI plus flexible et plus facilement adaptable aux projets financés, ce qui est à mon sens tout-à-fait positif, car cela contribue à soutenir et à renforcer l’action de la BEI, et donc a fortiori de l’Union, au-delà des frontières européennes. Les négociations avec le Conseil à ce sujet s’étant terminées et un accord satisfaisant ayant été trouvé, j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0013/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel sur les activités financières de la Banque européenne d’investissement (BEI). En effet, je suis résolument convaincue que les activités d’octroi de garanties par la BEI aux projets européens innovants, par le biais du Fonds européen d’investissement stratégique, représentent un soutien nécessaire et salutaire à la croissance, à l’emploi et à l’innovation sur notre continent. C’est d’ailleurs pourquoi j’avais voté en faveur du quasi-doublement de la dotation de ce Fonds géré par la BEI. Le rapport fait donc état des activités financières de la BEI sur l’année écoulée (via le fonds Juncker, mais aussi pour toutes les autres activités) et contribue en cela à la transparence et à l’obligation d’information et de communication que doit respecter une institution comme la BEI. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière en ce début de mois de février 2018.
2016/11/22
Summer-time arrangements (B8-0070/2018, B8-0071/2018) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de cette résolution sur les dispositions relatives à l'heure d'été, et plus précisément en faveur de l’amendement demandant des études plus approfondies quant aux conséquences de ce changement d’heure pour la santé des citoyens. En effet, si ce système est aujourd’hui remis en cause, c’est pour le doute qui subsiste quant à sa capacité à générer des économies d’énergies, mais aussi et surtout parce qu’il serait supposément néfaste pour la santé des citoyens européens, avec une influence notamment sur les cycles biologiques propres à chacun. Cependant, il me semble prématuré de mettre fin à ce mécanisme dès maintenant et dans la précipitation, alors que nous ne disposons pas encore d’études fiables et tangibles sur les conséquences de ce changement d’heure. J’ai donc voté pour que la Commission approfondisse cette question, par le biais d’études scientifiques objectives et indépendantes, afin que nous ayons les éléments nécessaires à la prise d’une décision quant à ce changement d’heure.
2016/11/22
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0007/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Hübner/Pereira sur la composition du Parlement européen. Ce rapport visait à définir la répartition des sièges entre les États membres pour la prochaine mandature 2019-2024, en tenant compte des modifications de population qui sont advenues depuis la dernière répartition en 2014. Je me félicite ainsi que la France ait gagné cinq sièges, en passant de 74 à 79 eurodéputés, ce qui accroît d’autant plus l’influence française au sein du Parlement européen. Cependant, j’ai voté contre l’article sur les listes transnationales, car si la symbolique aurait été belle, cette idée aurait été très difficile à mettre en place d’ici les élections de mai 2019. Je considère dès lors qu’il ne faut pas tomber dans la précipitation sur ces listes, mais plutôt travailler à rapprocher les eurodéputés des citoyens européens pour favoriser autant que faire se peut la participation aux prochaines élections, et donc renforcer la légitimité démocratique de l’institution majeure et primordiale qu’est le Parlement européen.
2016/11/22
Revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (A8-0006/2018 - Esteban González Pons) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Gonzalez-Pons sur la révision de l’accord-cadre sur les relations entre le Parlement européen et la Commission européenne. Il s’agissait ici entre autres de prendre une décision sur l’utilisation ou non du processus dit du « Spitzenkandidat » pour les prochaines élections européennes de mai 2019. Il s’agit du principe énonçant que le candidat chef de file du parti majoritaire à l’issue des élections au Parlement européen prendra, suite à ces élections, la présidence de la Commission européenne, avec l’aval du Parlement européen et du Conseil. Tout comme le reste de mon groupe, et la plupart des autres politiques, j’ai soutenu la réutilisation, pour 2019, de ce processus, puisqu’il permet au président ou à la présidente de la Commission européenne d’avoir malgré tout une certaine assise démocratique, compensant l’image technocratique dont est souvent affublée la Commission européenne. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport porté par mon collègue du groupe PPE Esteban Gonzalez-Pons.
2016/11/22
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (A8-0017/2018 - Ignazio Corrao) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Corrao sur l’échange automatisé de données relatives à l’immatriculation de véhicules au Portugal. Ce rapport vise à autoriser le Portugal à recevoir et à émettre des données quant aux véhicules immatriculés en son sein, dans l’objectif de renforcer la coopération transfrontalière et internationale avec le reste des États membres de l’Union. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens, puisqu’il semble logique que les États membres de l’Union puissent échanger entre eux leurs données respectives, d’autant plus dans le but d’assurer la sécurité des citoyens et de faciliter le travail des forces de l’ordre. Ce texte a donc recueilli mon vote en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Protection and non-discrimination with regard to minorities in the EU Member States (B8-0064/2018) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Wikström sur la proposition de résolution sur la protection et la non-discrimination des minorités dans les États-membres de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport, qui fait suite à une procédure au sein de la commission des pétitions, vise à prévenir les différentes formes de discriminations dont peuvent souffrir les minorités dans les États-membres de l’Union, que ces discriminations soient culturelles, ethniques, linguistiques, religieuses ou bien fondées sur l’origine ou la nationalité. Ce rapport établit un certain nombre de propositions pour combattre autant que faire se peut ces discriminations, en utilisant le contrôle qui est déjà réalisé par l’Autorité des Droits Fondamentaux. J’ai donc soutenu ce rapport en séance plénière, car il me semble évident que les discriminations, peu importe leur forme, ne sont pas acceptables en Europe et sont contraires aux valeurs fondamentales prônées par l’Union, et que dès lors, il nous faut soutenir les initiatives qui visent à les combattre, comme le fait ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution Blinkeviciute sur la tolérance zéro à l'égard des mutilations génitales féminines. Cette résolution, qui s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une question orale posée à la Commission européenne à l’occasion de la journée internationale contre les mutilations génitales féminines (MGF) le 6 février, vise à exprimer la position du Parlement européen vis-à-vis de cette pratique inacceptable, et de présenter des propositions dans l’objectif d’intensifier et de rendre plus efficace la lutte contre ces MGF. Étant moi-même très engagée par rapport aux enjeux liés à la condition féminine, et ayant siégé en commission sur les droits des femmes et l’égalité des genres, je ne peux qu’être sensible aux sujets développés dans cette résolution, et soutenir ce texte qui a le mérite d’alerter sur la situation des filles et des femmes victimes de ces MGF. J’ai donc sans hésitation aucune voté en faveur de ce texte en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Brazil Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0004/2018 - Angelo Ciocca) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du renouvellement de l’accord pour la coopération scientifique et technologique entre la Communauté européenne et le Brésil. Cet accord, qui date du mois d’août 2007, et qui fut déjà renouvelé en 2012 après une période de cinq ans, devait être pérennisé pour cinq ans de plus, par le biais d’une recommandation au Conseil. Je considère que les échanges internationaux, d’autant plus dans les domaines de la recherche scientifique et technologique, constituent des liens primordiaux entre les différents pays, et sont un très bon exemple des valeurs de partage et de coopération que porte l’Union européenne. Les deux parties à cet accord ayant manifesté leur souhait de renouveler cette coopération, j’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de sa mise aux voix en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (A8-0172/2017 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Thun sur le géoblocage et les autres formes de discriminations fondées sur la nationalité, le lieu de résidence ou le lieu d’établissement des clients au sein du marché intérieur. Ce rapport vise à limiter autant que possible les procédés de blocage géographique restreignant l’accès à certains sites de vente en ligne aux clients les consultant depuis certains pays ou certaines zones. Ces procédés constituent en effet une barrière au bon fonctionnement du marché intérieur en ce qui concerne le commerce électronique, en restreignant à certains clients l’accès à ces plateformes de vente au motif de leur nationalité ou de leur lieu de résidence ou d’établissement. L’objectif de ce texte est donc de supprimer ces barrières, ce que je soutiens puisque l’on doit pouvoir garantir tous les clients puissent bénéficier du même accès aux biens et aux services au sein du marché intérieur de l’Union, en vertu du principe de non-discrimination déjà posé par la directive sur les services. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017 - Julie Girling) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Girling sur l’amélioration du rapport coût-efficacité des réductions d’émissions et la favorisation des investissements dans les technologies à faibles émissions de carbone. Ce rapport, qui s’inscrit dans la continuation de la politique énergétique engagée par la Commission européenne depuis 2014, vise à détailler les obligations inhérentes à l’atteinte de la cible de 40 % de part des émissions de gaz à effet de serre d’ici 2030, et à améliorer le cadre législatif existant sur les investissements liés à l’industrie du charbon. Ce texte fut l’objet de nombreuses négociations entre les groupes politiques, et les compromis adoptés à la suite des négociations interinstitutionnelles ont permis d’aboutir à un rapport équilibré. Le charbon étant la première source de pollution au niveau mondial, il me paraît primordial que l’Europe se saisisse de cet enjeu afin d’encourager une transition progressive vers des technologies plus faiblement émettrices en carbone, et afin d’assurer à nos citoyens une politique énergétique qui soit en prise avec les défis énergétiques et climatiques qui continueront d’émerger dans les années à venir.
2016/11/22
European Central Bank Annual Report for 2016 (A8-0383/2017 - Jonás Fernández) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Fernández sur l’activité annuelle de la Banque centrale européenne pour 2016. Ce rapport d’initiative visait à exprimer la position du Parlement européen quant à la politique monétaire menée par la Banque centrale européenne (BCE) pour l’année 2016.En effet, bien qu’étant totalement indépendante dans la réalisation de ses missions, le Parlement européen expose, de manière annuelle, son point de vue sur la politique menée par la BCE durant l’année écoulée, et peut à ce titre exprimer des recommandations pour l’exercice à venir. C’était l’objectif de ce rapport, pour lequel un certain nombre de compromis ont pu être trouvés parmi les divers groupes politiques au Parlement européen, ce qui a contribué à lui donner un caractère plus équilibré.La politique monétaire étant l’une des compétences exclusives de l’Union, elle est d’une importance cruciale, d’autant plus dans le contexte macroéconomique actuel d’assouplissement quantitatif combiné à un retour de la croissance et de l’inflation.Dès lors, j’ai voté pour ce rapport lors de sa mise aux votes en cette session plénière de février.
2016/11/22
Accelerating clean energy innovation (A8-0005/2018 - Jerzy Buzek) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Buzek sur l’accélération de l’innovation dans le secteur des énergies propres. Ce rapport, qui fait partie du paquet « Énergie » proposé par la Commission européenne en novembre 2016, vise à renforcer l’investissement tant public que privé à destination des énergies renouvelables, et à stimuler et soutenir la recherche et l’innovation dans ce secteur. Ces objectifs sont en effet essentiels pour donner à la politique énergétique et climatique de l’Union européenne les moyens de ses ambitions, et les compromis adoptés entre le PPE et les autres groupes politiques sur ce rapport ont permis d’obtenir un texte qui soit équilibré, et qui fut approuvé à une très large majorité en commission de l’Industrie, de la Recherche et de l’Énergie. J’ai donc sans hésitation voté en faveur de ce rapport en séance plénière, car je veux que l’Europe continue de se saisir des enjeux climatiques et énergétiques, pour la protection de notre planète mais aussi et surtout pour celle de nos citoyens vis-à-vis des grands défis climatiques et énergétiques contemporains.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (A8-0406/2017 - Romana Tomc) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Tomc sur la mise en œuvre de l’initiative pour l’emploi des jeunes (IEJ) dans les États membres. En effet, les jeunes inactifs, qui ne suivent pas de cursus de formation et qui ne sont pas pour autant en emploi, sont encore environ 1,4 million en Europe, ce qui est très conséquent, et qui constitue un problème contre lequel nous devons lutter. C’est la raison d’être de l’IEJ. Ce rapport vise à entériner l’augmentation du budget dédié à l’IEJ pour la période 2017-2020, ainsi qu’à faire un état des lieux de son implémentation dans les États membres, tout en faisant des propositions pour améliorer son efficacité.C’est donc un rapport à mon sens salutaire, et sur un sujet qui me tient particulièrement à cœur, étant membre de la commission de l’emploi et des affaires sociales du Parlement européen, et ayant longtemps travaillé sur l’IEJ. J’ai donc sans aucune hésitation voté en sa faveur, car la lutte contre le chômage des jeunes européens doit rester l’une de nos priorités les plus vigoureuses!
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (A8-0401/2017 - Nicola Danti) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Danti sur la mise en œuvre de la directive 2005/36/CE en ce qui concerne la règlementation et le besoin de réforme des services professionnels. Ce rapport vise à évaluer la mise en œuvre de la directive 2005/36/CE sur la reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles. Il rappelle entre autres le caractère important de ces qualifications pour les Européens, et pour le modèle économique et sociale de l’Union européenne, et évalue en ce sens la mise en œuvre des dispositions de cette directive. C’est donc un rapport utile, sur un sujet très important et qui me tient à cœur en tant que membre de la commission de l’emploi et des affaires sociales, et c’est pourquoi ce dernier a recueilli mon vote en faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Blanco López sur la promotion de l’utilisation d’énergies renouvelables. Ce rapport vise à faire passer l’objectif de part d’énergies renouvelables dans la consommation d’énergie au niveau européen à 27 % d’ici 2030, ce qui est une cible ambitieuse qui contribue au respect de l’issue de la COP 21 et de l’accord de Paris. Le climat est un des plus grands défis de notre temps, et nous devons, si nous souhaitons ménager l’état de notre planète pour les générations futures, nous montrer à la hauteur de nos ambitions. C’est ce à quoi ce rapport contribue, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette première session plénière de l’année 2018.
2016/11/22
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Claude Turmes) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Turmes-Rivasi sur la gouvernance de l’union énergétique. Ce rapport vise à établir un cadre réglementaire pour la gouvernance de l’union énergétique, fondé notamment sur deux piliers : l’amélioration des techniques actuelles de planification énergétique, ainsi que la définition d’un processus politique commun entre tous les États membres pour atteindre les objectifs prévus pour l’union énergétique, et plus particulièrement les cibles énergétiques et climatiques pour l’année 2030. Cette union énergétique est très importante si l’Europe souhaite atteindre les objectifs énergétiques et climatiques qu’elle s’est fixés, et nous devons nous donner les moyens de la faire réussir. C’est l’objet de ce rapport, et c’est pourquoi ce dernier a recueilli mon vote en faveur.
2016/11/22
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Engström sur la zone de convention de l’Organisation régionale de gestion des pêches du Pacifique Sud (ORGPS) et ses mesures de gestion, de conservation, et de contrôle. En effet, l’Union européenne est membre de l’ORGPS, et il est donc nécessaire de transposer les mesures prises par l’ORGPS en droit de l’Union. C’est l’objectif de ce rapport, qui contribue dès lors à la bonne applicabilité des mesures de gestion, de conservation et de contrôle prises par l’ORGPS. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (A8-0389/2017 - Andrea Cozzolino) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Cozzolino sur la mise en œuvre des stratégies macro-régionales européennes. Ces stratégies macro-régionales sont établies sur un cadre pluriannuel sur la période 2014-2020, et rassemblent aujourd’hui 19 États membres et 8 États tiers. Elles se comptent aujourd’hui au nombre de 4, ce sont les zones Baltique, Danube, Adriatique-Ionienne, et Alpine. Ce rapport étudie la mise en œuvre de ces stratégies macro-régionales et vise à établir des propositions afin d’en accroître leur efficacité dans les années à venir. C’est un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens, et donc en faveur duquel j’ai voté en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures (A8-0381/2017 - Gabriel Mato) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mato sur la conservation des ressources halieutiques et la protection des écosystèmes marins par des mesures techniques. Ce rapport vise à limiter les captures accessoires et à limiter l’incidence de la pêche sur le milieu naturel et les écosystèmes.Bien que ces questions soient toujours très complexes, c’est un rapport pour lequel un compromis a pu être trouvé sur la majorité des points, ce qui est une bonne chose. Par ailleurs, si l’on a beaucoup entendu parler de ce rapport en ce qui concerne la pêche électrique, il faut savoir que celle-ci ne concerne qu’une infime partie des propositions de ce rapport.Néanmoins, cela reste un enjeu important, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté et cosigné des amendements visant à interdire cette pratique qui se révèle être dangereuse pour les écosystèmes marins. Au final, une fois cette question de la pêche électrique réglée, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport, puisqu’il va dans le bon sens en émettant des propositions dans l’objectif de conserver et préserver nos ressources halieutiques et piscicoles.
2016/11/22
International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (A8-0399/2017 - José Inácio Faria) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Faria sur la gouvernance internationale de l’océan et son agenda pour le futur de nos océans dans le contexte des objectifs de développement durable pour 2030. Ce rapport présente toute une série de mesures visant à décliner la réponse de l’Union européenne aux objectifs des Nations-Unies de développement durable pour l’année 2030, qui se centre principalement sur trois secteurs: l’amélioration du cadre réglementaire de la gouvernance océanique internationale, la réduction des pressions climatiques sur les océans et les mers, ainsi que la création de conditions pour le renforcement de la recherche scientifique sur les océans. Ces objectifs de 2030 sont cruciaux pour préserver l’état de nos ressources maritimes et il n’appartient qu’à nous de tout mettre en œuvre pour atteindre ce à quoi l’on s’est engagés. Ce rapport constitue la réponse du Parlement européen à ces objectifs louables, c’est pourquoi j’ai voté pour.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the directive on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (A8-0368/2017 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Corazza-Bildt sur la mise en œuvre de la directive 2011/93/UE sur la lutte contre les abus sexuels et l’exploitation sexuelle des enfants, ainsi que la pédopornographie. Ce rapport fait suite au rapport de mise en œuvre de la directive 2011/93/UE présentée en décembre 2016 par la Commission européenne, et propose un certain nombre de possibilités afin de mettre en œuvre plus efficacement cette directive, et lutter de manière plus adéquate contre l’exploitation sexuelle infantile et la pédopornographie. Ce sont en effet des fléaux qui, malheureusement, sont aujourd’hui encore trop présents, et il est nécessaire qu’une institution comme le Parlement européen se saisisse de ces questions et fasse tout ce qui est en son possible pour les endiguer. Ce rapport est donc important car ce sont la sécurité et le bien-être de tous les enfants européens qui sont ici en jeu, et qui dépendent de la bonne application de cette directive. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel sur l’implémentation de la Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune.Ce rapport se concentre sur trois éléments principaux : la coordination dans l’évaluation des menaces qui peuvent peser sur la sécurité en Europe, l’approfondissement des capacités européennes en matière de sécurité commune, ainsi que la coopération entre les États-membres dans le cadre de cette politique de sécurité commune.Ces trois éléments sont effectivement importants, et ce rapport qu’a rendu mon collège David McAllister est pour moi un rapport équilibré, et qui va dans le bon sens et dans la perspective d’un développement accru de la politique étrangère et de sécurité commune en Europe. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2016 and the EU policy on the matter (A8-0365/2017 - Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Quisthoudt-Rowohl sur les droits de l’homme et la démocratie dans le monde et la politique de l’Union européenne en la matière. Les droits de l’homme sont et doivent rester une priorité des politiques européennes, car il appartient à l’Europe de faire valoir les valeurs fondamentales de démocratie et de liberté qui ont contribué à sa fondation et à son rayonnement, et qui sont encore trop souvent violées dans bien des pays du monde. Après avoir dressé un état des lieux de la politique européenne en matière de droits de l’homme, ce rapport invite à soutenir l’introduction systématique de clauses relatives aux droits de l’homme dans tous les accords internationaux conclus par l’UE, en incluant les accords commerciaux. D’autres propositions y sont faites, notamment pour garantir la séparation des pouvoirs et la valeur démocratique, qui vont globalement dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0374/2017 - Linnéa Engström) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Engström sur la gestion durable des flottes de pêche externes. Ce rapport vise à harmoniser et moderniser à l’échelle européenne les conditions de délivrance d’autorisations de pêche pour les navires de pays tiers souhaitant pêcher dans les eaux de l’Union, et pour les navires de l’Union souhaitant pêcher hors des eaux européennes. Ce rapport constitue donc une avancée majeure en matière de politique de la pêche, et ce seront ainsi toute une série de pratiques abusives qui seront mieux encadrées, telles que les autorisations frauduleuses ou bien les changements de pavillons abusifs. Par ailleurs, un registre public électronique européen des autorisations de pêche sera créé pour la première fois, afin d’octroyer plus de transparence à ces procédures d’autorisations. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens, et qui a donc recueilli mon vote en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Girling sur le système européen de commerce d’émissions (EU ETS) et le maintien de l’actuelle restriction du champ d’application pour les activités aériennes et la préparation de la mise en œuvre d’un mécanisme de marché mondial à partir de 2021. En effet, bien que le secteur de l’aviation soit inclus dans la directive ETS de 2003 établissant un système européen d’échange d’émissions, ce secteur a toujours fait l’objet d’une exemption dans le cadre de vols vers et en provenance d’un pays tiers de l’Espace Économique Européen. Par ailleurs, l’Organisation de l’Aviation Civile Internationale (OACI) a annoncé l’année dernière mettre en place, à partir de 2021, un système global d’échange d’émissions pour le secteur de l’aviation civile et commerciale. Ce rapport vise donc à maintenir les clauses d’exceptions actuelles et à définir des dispositifs transitoires d’ici à ce que soient précisées les conditions de mise en place de ce marché mondial à partir de 2021. C’est un rapport équilibré, pour lequel la position du groupe PPE a prévalu, et qui a donc recueilli mon vote en faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Extension of the duration of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (A8-0198/2017 - Udo Bullmann, José Manuel Fernandes) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Fernandes/Bullman sur l’extension de la durée du Fonds Européen pour les Investissements Stratégiques ainsi que l’introduction d’améliorations techniques pour ce Fonds et pour la Plateforme Européenne de Conseil en Investissement. Ce rapport propose une augmentation du total de garanties octroyées de 300 milliards pour la période 2015-2017 à 500 milliards jusqu’en 2020, une augmentation du volet « PME » du Fonds Européen d’Investissement Stratégique, ainsi que des améliorations louables relatives à la Plateforme Européenne de Conseil en Investissement. Je suis profondément convaincue que ce fonds est nécessaire au soutien à la recherche et à l’innovation, au soutien à nos PME, mais aussi de manière plus globale au retour de la croissance économique en Europe, c’est pourquoi je trouve très positif son extension et son augmentation pour le cadre pluriannuel 2018-2020. J’ai donc bien entendu voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de son vote en séance plénière en ce mois de décembre 2017.
2016/11/22
EU-USA Air Transport Agreement (A8-0376/2017 - Theresa Griffin) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Griffin sur la proposition de décision du Conseil sur la conclusion de l’accord de transport aérien entre la Communauté européenne et ses États membres, d’une part, et les États-Unis, d’autre part. Ce rapport vise à harmoniser les réglementations concernant l’aviation civile et commerciale entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis, notamment en ce qui concerne les procédures de surveillance et d’essai des appareils aéronautiques civils, les opérations aériennes, les procédures de formation du personnels et, enfin, les services de contrôle du trafic aérien.Cette harmonisation était très largement demandée par les professionnels du secteur, étant donné que l’Europe et les États-Unis sont les deux plus gros marchés mondiaux en matière d’aéronautique civile et commerciale. Ce rapport rapproche encore un peu plus ces deux régions, leaders du transport aérien, ce qui ne peut qu’être bénéfique pour les entreprises aéronautiques, les transporteurs aériens, mais aussi et surtout les passagers.
2016/11/22
EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0335/2017 - Liisa Jaakonsaari) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Jaakonsari sur l’accord de partenariat et de coopération renforcée entre l’Union européenne et le Kazakhstan. Cette résolution s’adosse à la recommandation sur l’accord de partenariat et de coopération renforcée avec le Kazakhstan, et met l’accent sur un certain nombre de points, notamment la nécessité d’engagements sur des valeurs fondamentales de l’Union européenne telles que la démocratie, l’état de droit, ou le respect des droits de l’homme de manière plus générale. En effet, si ces accords de partenariat et de coopération renforcée avec les États voisins de l’Union européenne sont positifs, et même nécessaires, ils ne doivent bien évidemment pas se faire au détriment des valeurs fondamentales promues par l’Europe, qui sont pour nous non négociables. C’est pourquoi j’approuve tant la recommandation que cette résolution, et j’ai donc voté en leur faveur en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Towards a digital trade strategy (A8-0384/2017 - Marietje Schaake) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Schaake sur la mise en place d’une stratégie pour le commerce numérique. En effet, la numérisation et les nouvelles technologies font partie des enjeux principaux de notre siècle, et bien que la Commission européenne ait établi de nouvelles propositions à propos de cela, il n’en reste pas moins que la règlementation actuelle en matière commerciale reste parfois inadaptée aux nouvelles pratiques liées à la numérisation de notre économie.Ce rapport vise ainsi à pallier à ces inadaptations, en modernisant les réglementations concernant le commerce électronique et en ligne. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans un sens positif, et qui a su faire consensus entre les groupes politiques à travers l’adoption de compromis. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the general budget 2018 (A8-0371/2017 - Inese Vaidere) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vaidere sur la mobilisation du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union Européenne dans le contexte de paiements d’avances dans le cadre du budget général de l’Union européenne pour l’année 2018. Il s’agit, avec ce rapport, de prévoir, au sein du budget de l’Union pour 2018, une certaine somme à octroyer au Fonds de Solidarité de l’Union Européenne (FSEU), qui vise à garantir la possibilité d’aide financière de la part de l’Union en cas de catastrophes naturelles dans un ou plusieurs État(s) membre(s). Le FSEU n’est cependant pas qu’un fonds, c’est aussi un pilier de la politique européenne en matière de solidarité entre États membres. Pour 2018, la somme à octroyer à ce fonds a été fixée à 50 millions. Le fait d’inclure cette somme dès aujourd’hui dans le budget est totalement bénéfique car cela permettra au FSEU de répondre de manière plus efficace en cas de catastrophe naturelle dans l’Union pendant l’année 2018, car son budget et ses crédits auront déjà été fixés. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
2018 budgetary procedure (A8-0359/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Muresan/Ashworth sur le budget général de l’Union européenne pour l’année d’exercice 2018 (toutes sections). La conciliation budgétaire entre le Parlement européen, le Conseil et la Commission européenne s’étant achevée, il était maintenant l’heure d’approuver définitivement ce budget, en votant pour l’accord trouvé entre les trois institutions. C’est ainsi un budget équilibré que nous avons voté pour le prochain exercice 2018, et qui prévoit les ressources nécessaires aux secteurs les plus essentiels. Ce budget est la condition sine qua non pour que les institutions européennes, mais aussi l’Union européenne de manière plus générale, puissent continuer à fonctionner convenablement. Il était donc indispensable de trouver un accord sur ce budget, afin de pouvoir continuer à octroyer à l’Europe les moyens de ses ambitions. C’est maintenant chose faite, et nous pouvons nous en féliciter.
2016/11/22
Changes to the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and to the resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal and for the European territorial cooperation goal (A8-0358/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mihaylova sur les changements apportés aux ressources affectées à la cohésion économique, sociale et territoriale et aux ressources affectées aux objectifs «Investissement pour la croissance et l’emploi» et «Coopération territoriale européenne». Ce rapport visait à adapter le règlement sur les dispositions communes n°1303/2013 afin que les récentes décisions concernant le cadre financier pluriannuel relatif à l’extension de l’IEJ et le redéploiement des Fonds de cohésion non utilisés pour la période 2014-2020 soient prises en compte. Purement technique et étudié sans amendements, ce rapport vise simplement à entériner ces changements et à les intégrer dans le cadre financier de ces deux objectifs. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
Accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0364/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dzhambazki sur la décision du Conseil autorisant la Roumanie à accepter, dans l’intérêt de l’Union européenne, l’adhésion du Chili, de l’Islande et des Bahamas à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. En effet, une décision du Conseil est nécessaire afin que cette convention s’applique de manière multilatérale entre les nouveaux pays adhérents à la Convention, et les États membres de l’Union européenne, puisque l’enlèvement international d’enfants fait partie des compétences externes exclusives de l’Union européenne. Il s’agit donc ici d’enjoindre le Conseil à autoriser l’acceptation de la Roumanie concernant l’adhésion du Chili, de l’Islande, et des Bahamas, à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. L’adhésion de nouveaux pays à cette convention ne peut que renforcer son application et son utilité. De plus, la protection des enfants étant une des politiques prioritaires de l’Union européenne, ce rapport a bien entendu recueilli mon vote en faveur.
2016/11/22
Accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0362/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dzhambazki sur la décision du Conseil autorisant l’Autriche et la Roumanie à accepter, dans l’intérêt de l’Union européenne, l’adhésion de Panama, de l’Uruguay, de la Colombie et du Salvador à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. En effet, une décision du Conseil est nécessaire afin que cette convention s’applique de manière multilatérale entre les nouveaux pays adhérents à la convention et les États membres de l’Union européenne, puisque l’enlèvement international d’enfants fait partie des compétences externes exclusives de l’Union européenne. Il s’agit donc ici d’enjoindre le Conseil à autoriser l’acceptation de la Roumanie et de l’Autriche concernant l’adhésion de Panama, de l’Uruguay, de la Colombie et du Salvador à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. L’adhésion de nouveaux pays à cette convention ne peut que renforcer son application et son utilité. De plus, la protection des enfants étant une des politiques prioritaires de l’Union européenne, ce rapport a bien entendu recueilli mon vote.
2016/11/22
Accession of San Marino to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0360/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dzhambazki sur la décision du Conseil autorisant la Croatie, les Pays—Bas, le Portugal et la Roumanie à accepter, dans l’intérêt de l’Union européenne, l’adhésion de Saint-Marin à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. En effet, une décision du Conseil est nécessaire afin que cette convention s’applique de manière multilatérale entre les nouveaux pays adhérents à la convention et les États membres de l’Union européenne, puisque l’enlèvement international d’enfants fait partie des compétences externes exclusives de l’Union européenne. Il s’agit donc ici d’enjoindre le Conseil à autoriser l’acceptation de la Croatie, des Pays—Bas, du Portugal et de la Roumanie concernant l’adhésion de Saint-Marin à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. L’adhésion de nouveaux pays à cette convention ne peut que renforcer son application et son utilité. De plus, la protection des enfants étant une des politiques prioritaires de l’Union européenne, j’ai bien évidemment voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0361/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dzhambazki sur la décision du Conseil autorisant le Luxembourg et la Roumanie à accepter, dans l’intérêt de l’Union européenne, l’adhésion de la Géorgie et de l’Afrique du Sud à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. En effet, une décision du Conseil est nécessaire afin que cette convention s’applique de manière multilatérale entre les nouveaux pays adhérents à la Convention, et les États-membre de l’Union européenne, puisque l’enlèvement international d’enfants fait partie des compétences externes exclusives de l’Union européenne. Il s’agit donc ici d’enjoindre le Conseil à autoriser l’acceptation du Luxembourg et de la Roumanie concernant l’adhésion de la Géorgie et de l’Afrique du Sud à la convention de La Haye de 1980 sur les aspects civils de l’enlèvement international d’enfants. L’adhésion de nouveaux pays à cette convention ne peut que renforcer son application et son utilité. De plus, la protection des enfants étant une des politiques prioritaires de l’Union européenne, ce rapport a bien entendu recueilli mon vote en faveur.
2016/11/22
Transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 (A8-0255/2017 - Peter Simon) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Simon sur les exigences de fonds propres en ce qui concerne les dispositions transitoires visant à atténuer les incidences de l’introduction de la norme IFRS 9 sur les fonds propres et le traitement des grands risques en ce qui concerne certaines expositions du secteur public libellées en monnaies non-nationales des États membres. Ce rapport vise à introduire des mesures permettant de modérer l’impact de l’introduction récente des normes de compatibilité IFRS 9 (qui permettront d’inclure dans l’évaluation des actifs financiers les pertes potentielles que ces derniers pourraient engendrer) sur les fonds propres et les expositions de certaines branches de secteurs publics qui seraient libellés en devises étrangères. Ce rapport, qui a suivi la procédure législative accélérée, est positif et nécessaire car permettant l’adaptation et la transition suite à l’introduction d’une nouvelle mesure réglementaire. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Danjean sur l’instrument contribuant à la stabilité et la paix sur la période 2017-2020. Ce rapport vise à modifier certaines dispositions du règlement (UE) n°230/2014 relatif à l’instrument contribuant à la stabilité et la paix, et qui fut mis en place suite au Conseil européen sur la défense de 2013. De manière plus concrète, c’est un rapport qui permettra de débloquer de nouveaux fonds servants à financer entre autres des activités de formation, d’encadrement, et de conseil à destination des acteurs militaires dans les pays partenaires de cette proposition du SEAE et de la Commission européenne. Le Parlement européen aura par ailleurs un rôle de surveillance accrue dans l’utilisation de cet instrument jusqu’en 2020. C’est donc un rapport qui va selon moi dans la bonne direction, et que j’ai soutenu par un vote en faveur lors de la séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (A8-0302/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Hökmark sur le redressement des banques et le rang des instruments de dette non-garantis dans la hiérarchie en cas d’insolvabilité. Ce rapport, qui fait partie du « paquet bancaire » annoncé en 2016, vise à modifier certaines dispositions de la directive sur le redressement des banques et la résolution, dans le but d’harmoniser la hiérarchie des dettes et créances en cas d’insolvabilité. Ces mesures permettront d’assurer la sécurité juridique des cocontractants en cas de nécessité de redressement d’une banque, de résolution, ou bien de « bail-in », tout en facilitant le redressement des établissements en difficulté. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et que j’ai approuvé en votant en sa faveur lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
Value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods (A8-0307/2017 - Cătălin Sorin Ivan) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ivan sur certaines obligations en matière de TVA applicable aux prestations de services et à la vente à distance. Ce rapport fait partie d’un paquet législatif plus large visant à moderniser la TVA en matière de commerce à distance, et qui provient de la stratégie de la Commission européenne pour un marché unique numérique en Europe, ainsi qu’une TVA unifiée à l’échelle européenne. Ce rapport s’inscrit donc dans cet objectif plus large, et je suis d’avis que l’harmonisation de la TVA pour les biens vendus en ligne est une étape indispensable pour la réalisation de ce marché unique numérique européen que nous souhaitons, et pour lequel nous travaillons. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (A8-0306/2017 - Luděk Niedermayer) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Niedermayer sur la coopération administrative et la lutte contre la fraude en matière de TVA. Ce rapport fait partie d’un paquet législatif plus large visant à moderniser la TVA en matière de commerce à distance, et qui provient de la stratégie de la Commission européenne pour un marché unique électronique en Europe, ainsi qu’une TVA plus unifiée à l’échelle européenne. De manière plus précise, il s’agit ici de créer la structure et la coopération interétatiques nécessaires à l’application des directives contenues dans ce paquet administratif de modernisation de la TVA en Europe. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans un sens très positif, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the European Disability Strategy (A8-0339/2017 - Helga Stevens) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Stevens sur la mise en œuvre de la stratégie européenne en faveur des personnes handicapées. Ce rapport vise à exprimer la position du Parlement européen quant à la stratégie européenne pluriannuelle en faveur des personnes handicapées sur la période 2010-2020, suite au rapport d’avancement publié récemment par la Commission européenne sur ce programme. De nombreux amendements furent déposés en commission de l’emploi et des affaires sociales, dans laquelle je siège, sur ce rapport. Cependant, nombre de ceux-ci ont pu être couverts par des compromis qui se sont dégagés entre les groupes politiques, ce qui contribua à créer un rapport plus équilibré et consensuel. J’ai donc pu voter en faveur de ce rapport sur un sujet d’une importance majeure, le handicap, et sur lequel le Parlement européen doit agir afin de faciliter la vie quotidienne encore souvent trop compliquée des personnes handicapées sur notre continent.
2016/11/22
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0333/2017 - Charles Tannock) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Tannock sur la conclusion de l’accord de partenariat sur les relations et la coopération entre l’Union européenne et ses États membres, d’une part, et la Nouvelle-Zélande, d’autre part. Il s’agit ici de confirmer l’entente et la coopération de longue date qui s’est installée entre l’Union européenne et ses États membres et la Nouvelle-Zélande. Il nous faut développer ces liens, car la coopération économique avec les pays-tiers renforce la position de l’UE et de ses États membres au sein des chaînes de commerce mondiale. Ce rapport vise, en outre, à développer cette coopération non seulement dans le domaine économique et commercial, mais aussi dans les domaines de l’innovation, l’éducation, la culture, la lutte contre le terrorisme, ou encore la lutte contre la criminalité organisée et la cybercriminalité. C’est donc un rapport positif, et qui marque le début de relations bilatérales plus poussées avec la Nouvelle-Zélande, ce qui ne peut que nous être profitable.
2016/11/22
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (A8-0334/2017 - Maurice Ponga) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ponga sur la stratégie UE-Afrique comme coup d’accélérateur pour le développement. Ce rapport vise à présenter la position du Parlement européen en amont du cinquième sommet UE-Afrique qui se déroulera à la fin de ce mois de novembre à Abidjan. Il s’agissait alors ici d’évaluer le travail effectué depuis le début de ce partenariat et de proposer des pistes de développement pour le futur, notamment sur le plan de la jeunesse, des objectifs de développement durable, et du soutien à la paix et à la sécurité sur le continent africain. L’Afrique présente une valeur stratégique pour l’UE qui ne fera que s'accroître dans les années à venir. C’est donc un rapport très important, mais aussi très complet, qui fut établi par mon collègue Maurice Ponga, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016 (A8-0328/2017 - Marlene Mizzi) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mizzi sur le Rapport annuel des activités du Médiateur européen en 2016. Le Médiateur européen, qui tient son rôle en vertu de l’article 228 du traité de Rome, publie chaque année un rapport qui est porté à la connaissance du Parlement européen. Ce texte visait donc à récapituler les actions du Médiateur européen et à souligner les évolutions futures possibles. Le Médiateur européen reste une position très importante au sein des institutions européennes, puisqu’en 2016, ce ne sont pas moins de 1 880 plaintes qui ont été traitées, dont 245 nouvellement déposées en 2016. Le Médiateur européen est donc une institution très active, avec laquelle j’ai par ailleurs régulièrement l’occasion de travailler, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport López sur la lutte contre les inégalités comme moyen d’action pour favoriser la création d’emplois et la croissance. Ce rapport, qui est un rapport d’initiative, part du principe que la lutte contre les inégalités sera un des leviers principaux des politiques visant à favoriser l’emploi et la croissance en Europe dans les années à venir. Cela étant posé, ce rapport défend toute une série de mesures clés visant à réduire les inégalités dans l’Union européenne, telles que le renforcement des politiques d’emploi spécifiquement ciblées sur les populations ou classes d’âge les plus vulnérables (les jeunes, par exemple), le soutien aux travailleurs dans la transformation numérique du marché du travail, le renforcement des politiques de protection sociale au sein des États membres, la compensation des effets économiques négatifs de la dernière crise économique, ou bien encore la question de la différence de salaire entre les hommes et les femmes. Un grand nombre de compromis ont été trouvés entre les groupes politiques, ce qui contribua à la création d’un rapport équilibré et en adéquation avec les réalités du marché du travail européen. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0236/2017 - Salvatore Cicu) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Cicu sur la défense contre les importations qui font l’objet d’un dumping ou de subventions de la part de pays non membres de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport vise à modifier deux règlements européens, le règlement 2016/1036 dit «antidumping», ainsi que le règlement 2016/1037 dit «antisubventions». Ces deux règlements visent à octroyer à l’UE un arsenal de mesures nécessaires à sa défense commerciale contre le dumping effectué par des pays tiers et contre les tentatives de concurrence déloyale générées par des subventions sur certains produits octroyées par des pays non membres de l’UE. L’objectif de ce rapport était de doter les institutions européennes d’un tel instrument de défense commerciale avant que l’OMC ne statue sur la compatibilité de l’ancien mécanisme, le risque étant que, sans modifications, ce mécanisme ait été déclaré contraire au droit de l’OMC. Ainsi, avec l’adoption de ce rapport, l’Union européenne se protège contre cette éventuelle sanction, mais surtout protège ses consommateurs et ses entreprises des tentatives de dumping effectuées par des pays tiers. Ce rapport va donc dans la bonne direction, avec une méthode antidumping renouvelée et plus moderne. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-0593/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Lange/Rübig sur l’état d’avancement des négociations en amont de la onzième conférence ministérielle de l’OMC qui se déroulera à Buenos Aires en décembre 2017. Il s’agissait pour le Parlement européen d’établir une résolution exprimant sa position et son point de vue pour ces négociations de l’OMC. Cette résolution insiste sur deux points du Programme de Doha qui s’avéreront très importants dans ces négociations, et pour lesquels l’obtention d’un accord serait nécessaire: la détention des stocks publics à des fins de sécurité alimentaire, ainsi que la question des subventions à la pêche dans le cadre de la lutte contre la surpêche et la pêche illicite. La résolution aborde enfin la question du rôle que doit jouer l’assemblée parlementaire de l’OMC: le Parlement, à ce sujet, encourage l’OMC à octroyer une place plus importante à son assemblée parlementaire, qui est en quelque sorte la garantie de l’expression démocratique de l’Organisation. Cette résolution clarifie la position du Parlement européen, et plus généralement des négociateurs européens, au sein de la prochaine conférence interministérielle, ce qui est une bonne chose. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur en session plénière.
2016/11/22
Eastern Partnership: November 2017 Summit (A8-0308/2017 - Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Knut Fleckenstein) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Andrikiene/Fleckenstein sur le Partenariat oriental, dans la perspective du sommet de novembre 2017, sous la forme de recommandation au Conseil, à la Commission, et au Service européen pour l’action extérieure. Cette recommandation traduit la position du Parlement européen vis-à-vis du sommet qui doit se dérouler le 24 novembre à Bruxelles à propos du partenariat oriental. Il s’agit ici d’entériner la vision défendue par le Parlement européen durant ce sommet. Le rapport présente entre autres plusieurs propositions pour cette édition du sommet du Partenariat oriental, par exemple la nécessité d’augmenter les efforts des pays partenaires pour combattre la corruption et la criminalité organisée et assurer le maintien de l’état de droit et d’une bonne gouvernance dans ces pays, mais encourage aussi ces pays à poursuivre leurs efforts dans des domaines qui me semblent très importants tels que la lutte contre le chômage des jeunes, entre autres à travers certaines dimensions du programme EU4Youth. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Territorial typologies (A8-0231/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mihaylova sur la proposition de règlement du Parlement Européen et du Conseil amendant le règlement (CE) n°1059/2003 en ce qui concerne les typologies territoriales (Tercet). Ce rapport vise à régler le souci des typologies territoriales qui n’étaient pas couvertes par le précédent règlement. Avec cette proposition de règlement, ce sera maintenant chose faite, avec une précision accrue dans les définitions des critères servant à l’établissement des différentes typologies utilisées par les organismes de statistiques européens, au niveau de l’Union Européenne mais aussi dans les États membres. C’est une proposition de règlement qui va donc dans le bon sens, et pour laquelle j’ai voté lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation (A8-0338/2016 - Gesine Meissner) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Meissner relatif à la directive sur la reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles dans le domaine de la navigation intérieure. Ce rapport est bénéfique pour plusieurs raisons. Premièrement, parce qu’il vise à moderniser et mettre à jouer deux directives du Conseil relatives aux qualifications professionnelles en matière de navigation intérieure devenues aujourd’hui obsolètes car datant respectivement de 1991 et de 1996. Cette adaptation vise entre autres à étendre le champ d’application de ces directives, d’un point de vue géographique mais aussi sectoriel (tous les membres d’équipage seront maintenant concernés). Enfin, j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport puisque celui-ci introduit un nouveau système commun de certificats pour les travailleurs du secteur de la navigation intérieure, qui sera dorénavant basé sur les compétences et non plus sur l’expérience, comme c’était le cas jusqu’à présent. Ceci devrait avoir pour conséquence de simplifier le système de reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles et de favoriser la mobilité du travail dans le secteur de la navigation intérieure, ce qui est selon moi tout-à-fait positif.
2016/11/22
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (A8-0077/2017 - Olga Sehnalová) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Sehnalova sur l’application de la législation en matière de protection des consommateurs. Ce rapport a pour objectif de modifier le précédent règlement relatif à la coopération en matière de protection des consommateurs (règlement nº 2006/2004 dit «règlement CPC»), afin d’augmenter l’efficacité des procédures qu’il prévoit et le respect des règles qu’il édicte. L’idée ici est de favoriser au mieux la coopération entre les États membres afin de faire respecter ces actes législatifs européens, et surtout pour mieux faire face aux nouveaux défis posés par le marché unique numérique. Ce rapport est donc un rapport de modernisation des règles applicables afin de toujours mieux défendre les intérêts des consommateurs européens et d’assurer la pérennité de notre marché unique. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change (A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport García Pérez sur le déploiement des instruments de la politique de cohésion par les régions pour faire face au changement démographique. Ce rapport vise à proposer des mesures concrètes pour adapter la politique de cohésion au changement démographique affectant l’Union Européenne, dans un objectif de limiter les éventuelles conséquences négatives de ce changement. Le rapport met également l’emphase sur la vulnérabilité des zones rurales quant à ce changement démographique, et sur l’importance de la participation des collectivités publiques locales et régionales à ces mesures, ce qui est une bonne chose. C’est donc un rapport qui va selon moi dans le bon sens, pour lequel un compromis a su être trouvé entre les différents groupes politiques, et c’est pourquoi j’ai souhaité voter en sa faveur.
2016/11/22
Action plan on retail financial services (A8-0326/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ludvigsson sur le plan d’action sur les services financiers de détails. Ce rapport est en réalité la réponse du Parlement européen à la proposition de plan d’action sur les services financiers de la Commission européenne. Ce rapport s’inscrit dans l’engagement de la part des institutions européennes de construire une atmosphère favorable à l’émergence d’une union des marchés de capitaux en Europe. Le rapport met par ailleurs l’emphase sur la nécessité de contrôler la mise en œuvre de la législation actuelle en matière de régulation des services financiers de détail, et appelle enfin à un changement paradigmatique afin de permettre que l’Europe devienne un marché leader en matière d’innovation, en particulier dans les services financiers de détail, et au vu des récents développements technologiques qui affectent aujourd’hui les marchés de capitaux en Europe. Ce rapport va donc dans le bon sens et présente une dimension équilibrée avec l’adoption de compromis entre les différents groupes politiques. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive (A8-0297/2017 - Laura Ferrara) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ferrara sur l’application de la directive 2004/35/CE sur la responsabilité environnementale en ce qui concerne la prévention et la réparation des dommages environnementaux («DRE»). Ce rapport vise à évaluer l’application de la directive 2004/35/CE dite «directive sur la responsabilité environnementale», entrée en vigueur en 2004 et dont la transposition dans le droit interne des États membres s’est achevée en 2010. Ce rapport appelle, entre autres, à élargir le champ d’application de la directive 2004/35/CE sur la responsabilité environnementale et à une plus grande vigilance sur les questions de financement de cette responsabilité environnementale dans la réparation des dommages environnementaux. C’est un rapport qui, suite aux négociations entre les différents groupes politiques, a su prendre un tournant plus équilibré et permettant un consensus, et pour lequel j’ai donc voté lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation (A8-0387/2016 - Paul Tang) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Tang sur les règles communes sur la titrisation et la création d’un cadre européen pour une titrisation simple, transparente et standardisée (STS), qui fait partie du paquet «Titrisation». C’est un rapport qui vise, comme son nom l’indique, à rendre le phénomène de titrisation plus clair et plus transparent, notamment en différenciant les titrisations simples des montages financiers plus complexes, en établissant une nouvelle hiérarchie en ce qui concerne les méthodes de calcul des risques desdits montages, ainsi qu’en limitant autant que possible le phénomène de retitrisation. Tout ceci contribue à rendre cette dernière plus sûre et plus transparente, ce qui est tout à fait positif. Par ailleurs, ce rapport propose également que l’Autorité européenne du risque systémique (ESRB) soit compétente pour surveiller d’éventuelles prises de risques excessives en ce qui concerne la titrisation sur les marchés financiers: cela permettra également de mieux encadrer ce phénomène, à l’heure où les montages financiers qui l’utilisent deviennent de plus en plus complexes à saisir.
2016/11/22
Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (A8-0388/2016 - Othmar Karas) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Karas sur les prérequis prudentiels pour les institutions de crédit et les fonds d’investissement, deuxième rapport du paquet «Titrisation». Ce rapport vise à modifier les prérequis minimaux en matière de capitaux pour la titrisation afin que la titrisation effectuée par les banques et les organismes d’investissement soit plus sensible aux risques encourus sur le marché, plus simple, plus transparente et plus standardisée (on parle alors de titrisation STS). L’objectif est également de diminuer l’aléa moral sur les marchés financiers, ainsi que d’octroyer à l’Autorité européenne sur le risque systémique (ESRB) la possibilité de surveiller et de réagir lorsque des schémas de titrisation aux risques excessifs sont utilisés sur les marchés européens. Tout comme le rapport Tang, inclus dans ce paquet «Titrisation», ce rapport contribue à rendre la titrisation plus sûre, plus transparente, et plus claire, tant pour les acteurs financiers qui l’utilisent que pour les agences de régulation aux échelles nationale et européenne. Il va donc dans le bon sens, et j’ai voté pour.
2016/11/22
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia (A8-0311/2017 - Daniel Caspary) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Caspary de recommandation à l’intention du Conseil sur la proposition de mandat de négociation en matière commerciale avec l’Australie. Ce rapport fait suite à la publication de la Commission européenne du 14 septembre 2017 enjoignant le Conseil à autoriser l’ouverture de négociations commerciales sur un accord de libre-échange avec l’Australie. Le Parlement européen a un avis à rendre sur cette question, et c’est là l’objectif de ce rapport.Un tel accord de libre-échange avec l’Australie pourrait contribuer à une augmentation manifeste des échanges avec la zone océanique, et favoriser la création d'emplois dans les deux zones, tout en favorisant et encourageant une croissance et des méthodes commerciales intelligentes, durables et inclusives. C’est donc une initiative qui aura à mon sens des répercussions positives pour l’Europe, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with New Zealand (A8-0312/2017 - Daniel Caspary) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Caspary de recommandation à l’intention du Conseil sur la proposition de mandat de négociation en matière commerciale avec la Nouvelle-Zélande. Ce rapport fait suite à la publication de la Commission européenne du 14 septembre 2017 enjoignant le Conseil à autoriser l’ouverture de négociations commerciales sur un accord de libre-échange avec la Nouvelle-Zélande. Le Parlement européen a un avis à rendre sur cette question, et c’est là l’objectif de ce rapport.Un tel accord de libre-échange avec l’Australie pourrait contribuer à une augmentation manifeste des échanges avec la zone océanique et à un développement des relations entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande, tout en favorisant la création d’emplois et la croissance dans les deux zones, comme conséquences de ces échanges commerciaux accrus. C’est donc une initiative que je soutiens, et pour laquelle j’ai voté lors de la dernière session plénière.
2016/11/22
Monitoring the application of EU law 2015 (A8-0265/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Chrysonogos sur l’évaluation de l’application du droit de l’Union européenne en 2015. Ce rapport est une réponse au rapport que la Commission européenne, en tant que gardienne des traités, doit publier chaque année sur l’application du droit de l’Union européenne. C’est un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens puisqu’il vise à surveiller l’application du droit primaire et dérivé de l’Union européenne dans les États membres, ce qui prend une importance majeure à l’heure où la qualité, la lisibilité et l’accessibilité du droit par nos concitoyens européens sont de plus en plus contestées.Il nous faut donc être garants de la bonne application du droit de l’UE dans les États membres, et surveiller la transposition des directives prises au niveau européen (et de même pour les autres actes législatifs ne nécessitant pas de transposition, tels que les règlements), afin de garantir l’applicabilité et l’accessibilité du droit européen dans tout le territoire de l’Union européenne.J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (A8-0299/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Muresan/Ashworth sur le budget général de l’Union européenne pour 2018 (toutes sections). C’est un budget équilibré, et qui sanctuarise par ailleurs les programmes qui me tiennent à cœur et pour lesquels je me suis engagée: Erasmus+, Horizon 2020, l’initiative pour l’emploi des jeunes (IEJ, qui est augmenté à un niveau supérieur à celui initialement proposé par le budget provisoire). C’est un budget qui a comme chaque année fait l’objet d’énormément d’amendements, et de négociations entre les groupes politiques, mais qui a su dégager un consensus en amont du vote en séance plénière. Je lui ai donc apporté mon vote, car ce budget sera le pilier de l’action du Parlement européen pour l’année à venir, et je souhaite donner aux institutions européennes comme la nôtre les moyens de leurs ambitions!
2016/11/22
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens (A8-0064/2017 - Marita Ulvskog) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Ulvskog modifiant la directive 2004/37/CE concernant la protection des travailleurs contre les risques liés à l'exposition à des agents cancérigènes ou mutagènes au travail. La directive 2004/37/CE est une directive imposant des obligations spécifiques aux employeurs en matière d’exposition de leurs salariés à des agents ou substances pouvant revêtir un caractère néfaste pour la santé. Ce rapport vise à modifier cette directive, afin de la compléter à travers l’ajout de valeurs limites d’exposition pour plusieurs agents cancérigènes ou mutagènes (le chrome ou les fibres céramiques réfractaires, par exemple), ainsi qu’à modifier les valeurs limites pour d’autres produits. Tout ceci dans l’objectif que la directive 2004/37/CE soit mieux adaptée aux réalités des conditions de travail en Europe, et qu’elle puisse ainsi encore mieux protéger les travailleurs européens, en particulier en matière de santé et de risques sanitaires. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et que j’ai soutenu à travers mon vote, à l’instar de mon groupe politique.
2016/11/22
Establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data of third country nationals crossing the EU external borders (A8-0057/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Diaz de Mera Garcia sur le système d’entrée/sortie (EES) des frontières de l’espace Schengen. C’est un rapport qui vise à moderniser, à fluidifier, ainsi qu’à renforcer les procédures de contrôles aux frontières externes de l’UE.La modernisation prévue par ce rapport passe, entre autres, par une automatisation accrue de ces contrôles, l’établissement de systèmes informatiques plus adaptés, ainsi qu’une meilleure prise en compte des différentes situations de chacun.L’Union européenne propose en son sein un espace de libre circulation des personnes, ce qui confère donc au contrôle des frontières extérieures une importance cruciale. De plus, face au flux en constante croissance de voyageurs et de travailleurs souhaitant se rendre sur le territoire européen, une modernisation et une adaptation de ces contrôles aux frontières extérieures est nécessaire, afin de rendre ces contrôles plus faciles à réaliser, et donc à terme d’augmenter la sécurité à l’intérieur de l’UE. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens, et pour lequel j’ai voté lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism (A8-0294/2017 - Soraya Post) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Post sur l’intégration des Roms dans l’Union européenne du point de vue des droits fondamentaux et la lutte contre l’antitsiganisme.Ce rapport s’intéresse à l’antitsiganisme, et à l’exclusion des Roms et à leur discrimination, et établit un nombre de propositions pour pallier à ces problèmes, notamment à travers l’éducation, la participation accrue des populations tsiganes dans certaines sphères sociales et sociétales, ou encore le développement de l’accès à certains services publics tels que la justice ou les services de santé. La discrimination et l’exclusion ne sont jamais acceptables ni tolérables dans l’UE, et ce, peu importe le groupe qui en est victime.De plus, c’est un rapport d’initiative sur lequel la négociation entre les différents groupes politiques aboutit à l’émergence de compromis sur la plupart des points du rapport. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion (A8-0304/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mihaylova sur la proposition du Conseil amendant la décision du Conseil n°189/2014/EU autorisant la France à appliquer un taux d’imposition indirect réduit sur le rhum « traditionnel » produit en Guadeloupe, en Guyane Française, en Martinique et à la Réunion. En effet, ce rhum traditionnel est soumis à des procédures douanières spécifiques, qui se sont poursuivies depuis l’adoption du marché unique, à chaque fois avec l’approbation des instances européennes. Ce rapport vise à adapter ces procédures à la décision n°189/2014 du Conseil, en augmentant le quota annuel de 12%. Ces produits sont un atout pour la France et les régions ultramarines en termes d’image et d’exportation, et l’adaptation des quotas de rhum traditionnel aux récentes décisions du Conseil est une décision de bon sens, que j’ai approuvée lors de cette séance plénière par le biais de mon vote.
2016/11/22
Subjecting furanylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0309/2017 - Michał Boni) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Boni visant à soumettre la nouvelle substance psychoactive le furanylfentanyl à des mesures de contrôle. Suite à une évaluation, demandée par le Conseil, des risques potentiels pour la santé humaine de cette substance, il s’est avéré que le furanylfentanyl pouvait se révéler très dangereuse pour la santé des consommateurs.En conséquence, le Conseil, avec l’avis consultatif du Parlement européen, appelle les États membres à prendre des mesures de contrôle de cette substance, et de soumettre sa consommation à des sanctions pénales. Ce rapport vise à donner au Conseil l’approbation du Parlement européen pour mettre en œuvre cette décision.Les substances psychoactives qui s’avèrent dangereuses pour la santé humaine, à l’instar du furanylfentanyl, doivent être strictement encadrées. C’est cet encadrement que ce rapport vise à rendre possible, en donnant l’approbation du Parlement européen pour le mettre en œuvre. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes cost-effectiveness (A8-0296/2017 - Derek Vaughan) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vaughan sur le contrôle des dépenses et le suivi du rapport coût-efficacité des systèmes de garantie pour la jeunesse de l’Union européenne. Ce rapport s’intéresse aux mesures financières destinées à aider les jeunes européens en situation de chômage ou menacés de chômage. Le chômage des jeunes est un problème de plus en plus prégnant, et qui doit être combattu, puisque près de 20 % des jeunes dans l’Union européenne en 2016 étaient sans emploi.À ce titre, les programmes tels que les systèmes de garantie pour la jeunesse, dont il est question dans ce rapport, apparaissent indispensables afin d’aider nos jeunes à mieux s’insérer sur le marché du travail. Ce rapport vise à établir des propositions pour financer les politiques d’aide à l’emploi des jeunes de moins de 25 ans dans l’Union européenne, réaffirme la nécessité absolue de l’Initiative pour l’emploi des jeunes (IEJ) et appelle à son extension jusqu’à l’année 2020. C’est donc un rapport qui va pour moi dans le bon sens, avec des propositions salutaires pour l’emploi des jeunes dans l’Union européenne et c’est pourquoi ce dernier a recueilli mon vote lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances (A8-0359/2016 - Michał Boni) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Boni sur les nouvelles substances psychoactives: échange d’informations, système d’alertes précoces et procédure d’évaluation des risques. En effet, le trafic de drogues et de substances illégales est un enjeu majeur pour la santé et la sécurité de tous les consommateurs et citoyens européens, c’est pourquoi le Parlement européen doit s’en saisir et faire son possible pour encadrer et réguler la circulation des substances psychoactives dans le marché intérieur. Or, le marché des substances psychoactives est en constante évolution, avec l’émergence régulière de nouveaux produits. Dans ce contexte, le législateur européen doit répondre de manière efficace et adéquate. C’est dans ce sens que va ce rapport en adaptant la définition légale de «drogue», et en s’intéressant à ces nouvelles substances psychoactives. Ce rapport conclut trois ans de négociations en trilogues, et valide l’accord obtenu en mai dernier sur ce sujet. Cet accord va dans le bon sens, et c’est pourquoi j’ai voté en sa faveur, comme le reste de mon groupe politique.
2016/11/22
Common Fisheries Policy: implementation of the landing obligation (A8-0285/2017 - Alain Cadec) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Cadec sur la modification du règlement (UE) n°1380/2013 relatif à la politique commune de la pêche. Ce rapport vise à habiliter la Commission européenne à adopter des plans de rejets par le biais d’actes délégués, afin de pallier au temps que va prendre l’adoption de plans pluriannuels concernant le débarquement des captures pour les espèces faisant l’objet de limites de capture ou soumises à une taille minimale de référence de conservation. Cette possibilité était prévue par le règlement (UE) n°1380/2013, à titre temporaire uniquement. En ce qui concerne cette habilitation, elle ne vaudra que pour une durée de trois ans maximum. C’est un rapport sans divisions majeures entre les groupes, qui vise simplement à permettre la facilitation de la mise en pratique du règlement n°1380/2013, concernant l’obligation de débarquement des captures, tant que les plans de gestion régionaux pluriannuels ne sont pas adoptés. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (A8-0298/2017 - Jens Geier) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Geier établissant un budget rectifié pour le Fonds Européen pour le Développement Durable (EFSD), et la Réserve d’Aide d’Urgence (EAR). Ce rapport vise à établir les sources de financements du Fonds Européen pour le Développement Durable provenant du budget général de l’Union Européenne pour 2017, ainsi qu’à augmenter le montant annuel alloué à la Réserve d’Aide d’Urgence en faisant passer ce dernier de 280 millions d’euros à 300 millions d’euros. C’est un rapport très technique qui, suite à son adoption avec une très large majorité en commission des affaires budgétaires, n’a pas généré de divisions majeures entre les groupes politiques. J’ai donc voté en sa faveur lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty (A8-0292/2017 - Laura Agea) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Agea sur les politiques de revenu minimum comme outil pour lutter contre la pauvreté. Malgré un texte initial largement perfectible, les amendements déposés par mes collègues PPE de la commission de l'emploi et des affaires sociales, ainsi que ceux déposés par d’autres groupes politiques de centre-droit, ont contribué à rééquilibrer ce texte et à l’ancrer dans la réalité économique européenne. De plus, la pauvreté reste un fléau majeur en Europe, qui doit être combattu autant que faire se peut, afin que chaque citoyen européen puisse vivre de manière décente. Lutter contre la pauvreté doit être une des priorités du Parlement européen, et ce rapport d’initiative, en proposant d’utiliser les politiques de revenu minimum comme outil de lutte contre la pauvreté, va pour moi dans le bon sens, et a le mérite de s’intéresser à cette question et d’essayer de proposer des solutions pour lutter contre cette pauvreté. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de la dernière session plénière.
2016/11/22
Safety rules and standards for passenger ships (A8-0167/2017 - Daniela Aiuto) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Aiuto sur les règles et normes de sécurité pour les navires transportant des passagers. Ce rapport vise à moderniser la législation déjà existante pour les navires transportant des passagers. C’est un rapport qui, en plus de renforcer la sécurité des passagers de ces navires, répond à une demande de la France de réviser la législation existante (et notamment d’implémenter une exemption de 12 ans pour certains navires faits d’aluminium), car cette dernière pouvait potentiellement se révéler préjudiciable aux intérêts français en matière de transport maritime. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport lors de cette session plénière.
2016/11/22
Registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships operating to or from ports of the Member States (A8-0168/2017 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Bilbao Barandica sur la directive sur l’enregistrement des personnes voyageant à bord de navires transporteurs de passagers à destination ou en provenance des ports des États membres.Ce rapport vise à réviser la directive en vigueur jusqu’à présent sur le sujet, à savoir la directive 98/41/EC. C’est un rapport principalement technique, qui réussit à générer un consensus entre les différents groupes politiques ainsi qu’aux trilogues, et qui s’est donné pour objectif de simplifier, d’améliorer, et surtout de moderniser la législation existante relative à l’enregistrement de passagers et de membres d’équipages sur les navires en question (entre autres pour assurer plus de réactivité en cas de problème affectant la sécurité à bord, et d’octroyer aux services de secours maritime un accès simplifié aux listes des personnes à bord). J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
System of inspections for the safe operation of ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft in regular service (A8-0165/2017 - Dominique Riquet) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Riquet sur la proposition de directive du Parlement européen et du Conseil relative à un système d’inspections pour l’exploitation en toute sécurité de services réguliers de transbordeurs rouliers et d’engins à passagers à grande vitesse, modifiant la directive 2009/16/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil relative au contrôle par l’État du port et abrogeant la directive 1999/35/CE du Conseil.C’est un rapport qui vise à moderniser les systèmes d’inspection des transbordeurs rouliers et des engins à passagers à grande vitesse, ainsi qu’à rénover le système des inspections portuaires. Dans ce sens, et en cohérence avec le consensus que ce rapport a su développer entre les différents groupes politiques, j’ai voté pour cette directive qui me semble aller dans un sens tout à fait positif.
2016/11/22
Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0205/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Valean sur les restrictions s’imposant à l’utilisation de certaines substances dangereuses dans les appareils et équipements électriques et électroniques. Ce rapport vise à résoudre certains problèmes rencontrés lors de l’application de la précédente directive (datant de 2011, la directive dite «RoHS 2»), notamment en ce qui concerne son champ d’application. Il devenait nécessaire de s’intéresser et de résoudre ces problèmes avant la fin de la mandature, toujours dans un objectif d’assurer le maximum de sécurité possible aux professionnels et consommateurs européens utilisant les objets concernés par cette directive. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport en session plénière.
2016/11/22
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention area (A8-0173/2017 - Gabriel Mato) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Mato sur la Commission internationale pour la conservation des thonidés de l’Atlantique (CICTA) et ses mesures de gestion, de conservation, et de contrôle applicables dans la zone de la convention. Ce rapport vise à transposer dans le droit de l’UE les mesures et recommandations adoptées par la CICTA. En effet, les flottes de pêche européennes doivent, dans un souci de loyauté de la concurrence par rapport à leurs homologues non européens, être soumises aux mêmes normes que ces derniers. Dès lors, l’incorporation des mesures et recommandations prises par la CICTA dans le droit de l’UE contribue à favoriser cette loyauté de la concurrence dans le domaine des thonidés de l’Atlantique, et est dès lors favorable au bon exercice des activités de pêche dans les eaux de l’Union européenne. C’est ainsi une initiative salutaire, qui a recueilli mon vote lors de cette séance plénière.
2016/11/22
The fight against cybercrime (A8-0272/2017 - Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Vozemberg-Vriondi sur la lutte contre la cybercriminalité. Ce rapport vise à renforcer la coopération à l’échelle européenne pour lutter contre les crimes et délits commis sur le cyberespace (notamment entre les fournisseurs de services et d’accès à internet, ainsi qu’entre les autorités judiciaires nationales compétentes), et à encourager la prévention des usagers et des consommateurs à propos de cette cybercriminalité. La cybercriminalité est un fléau aujourd’hui plus répandu que jamais, et présente des enjeux stratégiques et sécuritaires dont l’Union Européenne doit se saisir, pour la sécurité et le bien-être de ses citoyens. C’est pourquoi j’ai voté en faveur de ce rapport, qui a le mérite d’effectuer des propositions concrètes et réalistes pour la lutte contre la criminalité en ligne.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with ASEAN (A8-0243/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Bütikofer sur les relations politiques de l’UE avec l’ANASE. Ce rapport dresse un état des lieux des relations entre l’Union européenne et l’Asie du Sud-Est, tout en établissant des propositions pour développer les relations entre l’UE et la zone couverte par l’ANASE dans les années à venir. La région de l’ANASE est une zone pivot incontournable du commerce international, et possède donc à ce titre un poids géopolitique et géoéconomique considérable. C’est pourquoi l’UE se doit de continuer à approfondir ses relations avec cette partie du monde. Dans ce cadre, le rapport propose de maintenir et de développer la coopération existante au sein des institutions multilatérales, ainsi qu’un partenariat concernant les domaines liés à la sécurité, qui inclurait des dispositifs de partage d’expériences, et de renforcement des capacités régionales. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et que j’ai soutenu en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Chile Agreement on trade in organic products (A8-0257/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Rodriguez-Pinero sur l’accord entre l’Union européenne et la République du Chili sur le commerce des produits biologiques. Ce rapport vise à approuver la proposition de la Commission européenne sur l’établissement d’un accord avec le Chili concernant les produits biologiques, tels que certains produits agricoles ou certaines denrées alimentaires. Cet accord doit favoriser le commerce de ces produits, tout en renforçant la protection des labels biologiques respectifs, et en assurant l’intégrité des produits, et la coopération entre les producteurs des deux zones respectives. C’est donc une bonne initiative, qui contribue à renforcer encore plus la qualité des produits distribués à nos consommateurs, et à favoriser les produits issus d’une agriculture biologique plus respectueuse de l’environnement. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu ce rapport lors de la dernière session plénière.
2016/11/22
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (A8-0120/2017 - Sirpa Pietikäinen) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Pietikäinen sur la proposition pour un règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil amendant les règlements (EU) n°345/2013 et n°346/2013 sur les fonds européens de capital-investissement et d’entrepreneuriat social. Ce rapport propose de diminuer les seuils de capital initial requis pour la création de fonds européens d’entrepreneuriat social (dits fonds «EuSEF») ou de capital-investissement (dits fonds «EuVECA ») pour les placer à 50 000 €. Il propose également d’étendre le champ d’entreprises pouvant recevoir des investissements de la part des deux types de fonds d’investissement susmentionnés.Enfin, le rapport propose de renforcer le pouvoir de contrôle de l’Autorité européenne des marchés financiers (AEMF) afin d’assurer que ces fonds satisfassent la réglementation européenne les concernant, et qu’ils puissent être supervisés par les autorités financières nationales dès lors que cela s’avère nécessaire. Ce rapport va donc dans le sens d’une plus grande liberté pour les gestionnaires de fonds d’investissement européens, sans pour autant assouplir de manière trop patente la réglementation en matière financière, ni les pouvoirs de supervision des autorités compétentes sur ces deux types de fonds d’investissement.
2016/11/22
A new skills agenda for Europe (A8-0276/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Momchil Nekov) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Dlabajová/Nekov sur une nouvelle stratégie en matière de compétences pour l’Europe. Ce rapport vise à garantir l’accès à des formations, à des compétences, et à un soutien adapté pour tous les citoyens européens, ainsi qu’à former les employés à de nouvelles qualifications face à un contexte toujours changeant. Ceci leur permettra d’accroître leur employabilité, et leurs chances de réussite dans leur carrière. C’est donc un rapport que je soutiens totalement, puisque nous devons, en tant que représentants politiques européens, aider nos concitoyens à accéder à l’emploi, à lutter contre le chômage encore trop présent dans certains pays, et à s’adapter tout au long de leur carrière.Ce rapport préconise de moderniser les systèmes d’enseignement, d’améliorer la formation continue à l’échelle européenne et de transmettre les outils nécessaires à une bonne transition des travailleurs vers le numérique et les nouvelles technologies. C’est donc une initiative tout à fait bénéfique pour le marché du travail européen, et que je soutiens totalement.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with India (A8-0242/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Preda sur les relations politiques de l’Union européenne avec l’Inde. Ce rapport dresse un bilan des relations que l’Union entretient avec l’Inde, et des négociations entamées sur le projet d’accord de commerce bilatéral entre l’Union européenne et l’Inde : le BTIA (Broad-Based Trade and Investment Agreement ou accord étendu sur le commerce et les investissements). Ce rapport préconise d’approfondir encore la coopération avec l’Inde, de continuer les négociations sur cet accord commercial, afin de pouvoir libérer le plein potentiel des relations que l’UE possède avec l’Inde. Il convient d’ailleurs de noter que l’UE est le premier partenaire commercial de l’Inde. Les relations avec l’Inde doivent donc être développées, surtout du point de vue économique, mais sans oublier la question des droits de l’homme, qui reste aussi très prégnante dans les relations que l’UE entretient avec ses partenaires commerciaux. Ce rapport est exactement sur cette ligne, et c’est pourquoi je l’ai soutenu en session plénière.
2016/11/22
Uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals (A8-0065/2017 - Jussi Halla-aho) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Halla-aho sur le modèle uniforme de permis de séjour pour les ressortissants de pays tiers. Ce rapport s’inscrit dans la même ligne que la proposition de la Commission sur le sujet, et vise à établir un modèle unique de titre de séjour pour les ressortissants de pays tiers. Cette harmonisation permettrait de lutter contre la fraude et la contrefaçon de documents d’identité, dans le même esprit que ce qui avait été implémenté dans le cas de la vignette-visa. Ce rapport, étant principalement d’ordre technique, a eu le mérite de faire consensus au sein des différents groupes, et le texte final a suivi la ligne de notre groupe politique, le groupe PPE. J’ai donc voté en faveur de ce rapport.
2016/11/22
EU political relations with Latin America (A8-0268/2017 - Javi López) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport López sur les relations politiques avec l’Amérique latine. Ce rapport souligne la grande importance du développement de partenariats régionaux avec la région latino-américaine, qui est un continent présentant de grands défis mais aussi par conséquent de grandes opportunités. Cela est particulièrement vrai du point de vue économique, puisqu’un très grand nombre d’entreprises européennes sont implantées en Amérique latine et que ces dernières pourraient bénéficier d’un accord à grande échelle, à l’instar des accords qui existent déjà entre l’Union européenne et la Colombie, le Pérou, le Mexique ou encore la zone Mercosur. Le rapport López appelle d’ailleurs à renforcer et approfondir la coopération issue de ces accords, notamment en mettant l’accent sur le Mexique, le Brésil et l’Argentine, qui sont des partenaires clés dans le développement de l’influence européenne dans la zone latino-américaine. Ce rapport est donc bénéfique pour l’avenir des relations entre l’UE et l’Amérique latine, un de ses incontournables partenaires commerciaux, et c’est pour cela que j’ai voté en faveur de ce texte en session plénière.
2016/11/22
Corruption and human rights in third countries (A8-0246/2017 - Petras Auštrevičius) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Austrevicius sur la corruption et les droits de l’homme dans les pays tiers. Ce rapport traite de la question de la corruption, avec le mérite de l’aborder sous un angle transversal, régional et interdépendant. Cette corruption s’immisce dans la vie politique et entrave le développement socio-économique de certains pays de l’Union européenne. Elle est un phénomène contre lequel les institutions européennes doivent s’unir afin de l’endiguer le plus possible. La corruption a en effet des conséquences parfois très négatives sur le commerce et l’investissement et représente donc un ennemi qu’il faut combattre. On peut citer également tout ce qui a trait à la fraude électorale et qui fragilise les systèmes politiques de certains pays. À ce titre, le rapport s’avère bénéfique puisqu’il relève le rôle positif que peuvent avoir les missions d’observation électorale et encourage leur développement. Il vise par ailleurs à promouvoir l’inclusion, au sein des contrats de marchés publics, de clauses de lutte contre la corruption et de dispositions spéciales, afin de limiter et de prévenir la corruption lors de la passation de contrats de marchés publics. J’ai donc soutenu ce rapport lors de la session plénière de septembre.
2016/11/22
EU-Iceland Agreement on the protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs (A8-0254/2017 - David Borrelli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Borelli sur l’accord entre l’UE et l’Islande sur la protection d’appellations géographiques pour les produits agricoles et alimentaires. L’Islande n’a pas encore d’appellations géographiques, et n’est par conséquent pas incluse dans l’accord EEE régissant les appellations géographiques européennes pour l’instant.Ainsi, il convenait de régler ce problème, et c’est ce que se propose de faire ce rapport, en établissant des bases de négociations pour l’inclusion et la protection réciproques des produits européens d’appellations géographiques contrôlées en Islande, et vice-versa en ce qui concerne les produits islandais. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et que j’ai soutenu en session plénière.
2016/11/22
EU-Iceland Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0256/2017 - David Borrelli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Borelli sur l’accord sous forme d’échange de lettres entre l’Union européenne et l’Islande concernant l’octroi de préférences commerciales supplémentaires pour les produits agricoles. Cet accord vise à renforcer le précédent accord datant de 2007 entre l’UE et l’Islande, à travers la libéralisation d’un très grand nombre de lignes tarifaires supplémentaires, afin que les échanges entre l’UE et l’Islande soient plus libres et plus faciles.Par ailleurs, l’Islande s’est engagé à réduire ses quotas sur un grand nombre de produits agricoles, ce qui aura pour effet d’augmenter les exportations européennes vers l’Islande, mais aussi de permettre à plus de la moitié des produits islandais d’entrer dans le reste de l’UE en franchise de droits.Ceci devrait permettre d’accroître la diversité de biens disponibles pour nos concitoyens européens, et la libéralisation de ces échanges devrait renforcer la concurrence et donc, à terme, contribuer à faire baisser les prix de ces biens de premières nécessité, afin qu’ils restent accessible financièrement à tous les consommateurs. J’ai donc soutenu ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Mediation Directive (A8-0238/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Chrysonogos sur certains aspects de la médiation en matière civile et commerciale. Ce rapport propose aux États membres d’approfondir et d’améliorer leur application de la directive 2008/52/CE sur la médiation en matière civile et commerciale. Cette directive prévoyait de développer l’accès aux modes alternatifs de règlement des conflits et des litiges à travers la médiation, tout en ne limitant pas de manière trop abrupte les possibilités, pour les requérants, de bénéficier d’une procédure devant un juge judiciaire.Nonobstant la bonne application, par les États membres, de la directive de 2008, le rapport Chrysonogos propose des voies pour améliorer encore cette application et perfectionner l’accès aux modes alternatifs de règlement des différends tels que la médiation. Cet accès à la médiation est indispensable dans la mesure où cette procédure permet de régler à l’amiable les litiges qui peuvent l’être: ceci a pour effet de désengorger les tribunaux judiciaires et de réduire la durée des procédures, sans pour autant réduire la portée juridique des décisions prises suite aux médiations, puisque ces dernières peuvent et doivent dans certains cas être homologuées par un juge judiciaire pour entériner le règlement du conflit.
2016/11/22
The functioning of franchising in the retail sector (A8-0199/2017 - Dennis de Jong) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport De Jong sur le fonctionnement du franchisage dans le secteur du commerce de détail. Le franchisage est un système économique qui fonctionne bien, principalement dans le secteur du commerce de détail, mais qui est actuellement bien moins utilisé dans l’Union européenne que chez nos principaux partenaires commerciaux au niveau mondial, d’autant plus qu’au sein de l’UE, seul un petit nombre d’États membres y ont recours, et concentrent à eux seuls le chiffre d’affaires généré par le modèle du franchisage.Ainsi, le rapport vise à harmoniser les régimes de franchisage entre les différents États membres, de manière à ce que ces différences législatives n’agissent plus comme barrière non-tarifaire au développement du commerce dans le marché intérieur, et permette le développement de chaînes de commerce transfrontalières entre les différents pays membres. C’est donc un rapport qui va dans le bon sens, et qui vise à redonner du dynamisme et de la vigueur aux entreprises européennes, et à notre marché intérieur. C’est un rapport d’initiative équilibré par les différents amendements déposés par les groupes politiques (dont le groupe PPE), et que j’ai soutenu pour cette raison.
2016/11/22
A Space Strategy for Europe (A8-0250/2017 - Constanze Krehl) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Krehl sur une stratégie spatiale pour l’Europe. Ce rapport vise à tirer parti des opportunités que l’espace a à nous offrir, à aider au développement du secteur spatial européen et à sa compétitivité, à renforcer l’autonomie de l’Union Européenne en matière spatiale, ainsi qu’à replacer l’Europe au-devant de la scène internationale, toujours en matière spatiale. Ce rapport vise également à consolider les financements octroyés aux bases de lancement européennes telles que celle de Kourou, en Guyane, ainsi qu’à développer la coopération entre l’Agence Spatiale Européenne (l’ESA), qui n’est pas une institution de l’Union Européenne, et les autres agences de l’UE. Le secteur spatiale revêt, aujourd’hui plus que jamais, une importance stratégique qui ne doit pas être oubliée par l’Union Européenne. Il faut replacer l’Europe au cœur de la scène spatiale internationale, favoriser l’innovation de notre secteur spatial, sa compétitivité, et affirmer notre présence à l’échelle mondiale. C’est précisément l’objectif que s’est donné ce rapport.
2016/11/22
Repeal of obsolete regulations with regard to inland waterway and road haulage sectors (A8-0228/2017 - Karima Delli) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Delli sur l’abrogation de règlements obsolètes sur le transport sur les voies fluviales intérieures et le transport routier. Ces trois règlement (Règlement (EEC) n°1101/89 sur les voies fluviales intérieures, règlement (EC) n°685/2001 sur le transport de produits entre l’UE et la Bulgarie et la Roumanie, et le règlement (EC) n°2888/2000 sur les quotas pour le transport de marchandises lourdes depuis la Suisse). Ces trois règlement étaient obsolètes, puisque soit remplacés par de nouveaux règlements ou éléments de législation, soit car n’ayant plus d’intérêt (dans le second cas par exemple, la Bulgarie et la Roumanie ont, depuis, rejoint l’UE). Il est donc salutaire d’abroger ces règlements obsolètes afin de renforcer la lisibilité de la législation européenne, d’éviter les chevauchements, et d’améliorer la qualité de l’accès aux éléments de droit européen par les professionnels concernés, mais aussi par tous les citoyens européens. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu ce rapport, qui va selon moi dans le bon sens.
2016/11/22
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Zorrinho sur la promotion de la connexion à internet dans les collectivités locales. Ce rapport, compris dans le «paquet connectivité», établit le programme «Wifi4EU» visant à proposer, partout en Europe et dans l’espace public, un accès internet gratuit et à haut débit aux citoyens.Ce programme Wifi4EU est une excellente initiative afin de montrer aux citoyens européens que l’Europe peut se montrer utile dans leur quotidien, et ce, d’une manière concrète et immédiate. De surcroît, en renforçant la connectivité à internet de certaines régions reculées, ce programme peut également contribuer à lutter contre l’isolement (pour des raisons géographiques ou de développement territorial) dont souffrent certains territoires, et à favoriser l’inclusion et la cohésion territoriale au sein de l’entièreté du territoire de l’Union européenne.C’est donc un programme qui a été soutenu par mon groupe politique, et que je soutiens personnellement sans aucune ambiguïté, qui apportera de la cohésion et de l’inclusion au sein de l’Europe, et qui renforcera d’autant plus la proximité entre l’Union européenne et ses citoyens.
2016/11/22
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (A8-0310/2016 - Jerzy Buzek) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Buzek sur des mesures visant à garantir la sécurité de l’approvisionnement en gaz. En effet, le réseau d’approvisionnement en gaz en Europe revêt une grande importance tant sur le plan stratégique que sécuritaire, puisque des brèches de sécurité dans ce réseau pourraient avoir de sérieuses conséquences. Ce rapport propose de renforcer la sécurité de notre réseau en redéfinissant le découpage des régions prévalant jusqu’à présent, et en définissant quatre corridors d’urgences pour pallier à toute éventualité de rupture d’approvisionnement. Est également mis en place un mécanisme juridiquement contraignant de solidarité entre États-membres, de dernier recours, si l’un d’eux subit une importante rupture d’approvisionnement. Enfin, ce rapport renforce l’échange d’informations et la coopération entre les États membres concernant l’approvisionnement en gaz. Tout ceci représente donc à mes yeux une bonne initiative renforçant la sécurité de l’approvisionnement en gaz en Europe, et donc par conséquent renforçant la sécurité des citoyens européens et la fourniture en gaz sur toute l’UE.
2016/11/22
EU accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (A8-0266/2017 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du Rapport Corazza-Bildt/Revault-d’Allonnes-Bonnefoy sur l’adhésion de l’Union Européenne à la convention du Conseil de l’Europe sur la prévention et la lutte contre la violence à l’égard des femmes et la violence domestique. Cette convention, aussi appelée Convention d’Istanbul, est le premier traité européen juridiquement contraignant dans le cadre de la lutte contre les violences faites aux femmes et la répréhension des auteurs de crimes et délits fondés sur le genre. Cette convention permet de mieux caractériser juridiquement ce type d’infractions et de coordonner, à travers des politiques globales, la lutte contre ce fléau et la prévention à l’égard des citoyennes européennes. L’objectif est également de permettre la poursuite des auteurs de ces actes, afin de ne pas laisser impunis les auteurs de ces crimes et de ces délits. Bien trop de femmes sont, encore aujourd’hui, victimes de violences conjugales ou liées à leur condition de femmes. Il est donc impératif que l’Union Européenne prenne des mesures fortes permettant de lutter contre ces actes et de protéger ces victimes, et ce rapport est une salutaire avancée en cette direction.
2016/11/22
Impact of international trade and EU’s trade policies on global value chains (A8-0269/2017 - Maria Arena) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport Arena sur l’incidence du commerce international et des politiques commerciales de l’Union européenne sur les chaînes de valeur mondiales. Cependant, si ces chaînes de valeurs jouent un rôle majeur en matière de commerce international, elles ne doivent pas se mettre en œuvre au détriment du caractère équitable du commerce, ou du respect des droits de l’homme ou des normes sociales et environnementales. À ce titre, ce rapport vise à garantir le respect des normes et principes susmentionnés dans le cadre de ces chaînes de valeurs mondiales, d’autant plus qu’un grand nombre d’initiatives internationales (de l’ONU, de l’OCDE, ou encore de l’OIT) vont dans cette même direction. C’est donc une question dont les institutions européennes doivent se saisir.À la suite d’un certain nombre d’amendements déposés par les divers groupes politiques du Parlement européen, dont le groupe PPE, le rapport est arrivé à un équilibre entre protection des droits des citoyens et des travailleurs concernés par ces chaînes de valeur mondiales, sans pour autant faire peser sur les entreprises de trop lourdes contraintes, et risquer d’endommager le bon fonctionnement de la concurrence au niveau international. C’est pourquoi j’ai soutenu ce rapport en séance plénière.
2016/11/22
HIV, TB and HCV epidemics in Europe on the rise (B8-0436/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la proposition de résolution sur la lutte contre le VIH/Sida, la tuberculose et l’hépatite C.Ces maladies représentent les plus graves menaces transfrontalières pour la santé publique sur notre continent.Face à leur recrudescence, l’Union européenne se doit de mettre en place un plan d’action intégré, avec une coopération transfrontalière et multisectorielle tenant compte de la diversité des situations des États membres de l’Union et des pays voisins.Il est nécessaire que les États membres et la Commission garantissent un niveau de dépenses et une mobilisation des ressources suffisante et œuvrent à faciliter la recherche et l’accès à des traitements innovants.La prévention et le dépistage sont essentiels. Il s’agit notamment de permettre la gratuité des tests de dépistage.La Commission européenne et le Conseil européen doivent assurer un rôle politique fort dans le dialogue avec les pays voisins d’Europe orientale et d’Asie centrale, pour veiller à la mise en place de programmes de transition durable vers des financements nationaux afin de garantir la durabilité et l’efficacité de leur action.Cette résolution vise également à l’instauration de programmes de surveillance harmonisés à l’échelle de l’Union et d’un plan d’éradication de l’hépatite C.
2016/11/22
The role of fisheries-related tourism in the diversification of fisheries (A8-0221/2017 - Renata Briano) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur le rôle du tourisme lié à la pêche dans la diversification du secteur de la pêche.Au cours des dernières décennies, de nombreuses communautés vivant de la pêche traditionnelle dans l’Union européenne ont été soumises à une pression croissante exercée par de multiples facteurs négatifs, tels que la surpêche et la diminution des ressources halieutiques, le changement climatique, la pollution, le déclin démographique et la perte d’attractivité du métier.Un nombre croissant de communautés traditionnelles de pêcheurs en Europe ne peuvent plus dépendre uniquement de la pêche traditionnelle.Il est important pour ces pêcheurs de pouvoir diversifier leur activité notamment dans le tourisme lié à la pêche. Cette activité ne doit pas remplacer le métier de pêcheur, mais constituer une activité complémentaire à leur activité principale de pêche.Le tourisme lié à la pêche présente le potentiel nécessaire pour contribuer à la création d’emplois, à l’intégration sociale et à la redynamisation des communautés qui dépendent de la pêche.Cette résolution vise ainsi notamment à assurer un financement adéquat du tourisme lié à la pêche dans le Fond européen pour les affaires maritimes et la pêche (FEAMP), mais également via d’autres instruments financiers.
2016/11/22
European agenda for the collaborative economy (A8-0195/2017 - Nicola Danti) FR

L’économie collaborative présente de nombreux avantages économiques et sociétaux. Elle impacte positivement la croissance, l’emploi, l’inclusion sociale et contribue au développement durable.Cependant, afin de limiter la fraude fiscale et de maintenir les standards de protection des consommateurs ainsi que des travailleurs, dont la réduction affecterait l’environnement urbain et la société, il est nécessaire de réguler l’économie collaborative. La création d’un cadre de régulation et de contrôle permettrait d’empêcher le risque de fragmentation. Ce rapport propose donc la mise en place d’une stratégie européenne équilibrée, plus vaste et plus ambitieuse en matière d’économie collaborative.La mise en place d’une stratégie permettrait de mettre un terme à la duplication et à la fragmentation à l’échelle européenne qui nuisent au commerce transfrontalier. Cette stratégie cherche aussi à faciliter et à promouvoir l’accès à des lignes de financement appropriées pour les entrepreneurs européens qui exercent leur activité dans le secteur de l’économie collaborative, y compris dans le cadre du programme européen pour la recherche et l'innovation (Horizon 2020).
2016/11/22
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0407/2017, B8-0407/2017, B8-0408/2017, B8-0409/2017, B8-0410/2017, B8-0411/2017, B8-0412/2017, B8-0413/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la proposition de résolution sur la situation humanitaire au Yémen où la situation humanitaire est extrêmement détériorée. Des milliers de personnes ont été tuées ou blessées. L’insécurité alimentaire est particulièrement grave et généralisée et des foyers épidémiques sont apparus. Les femmes et les enfants sont particulièrement touchés. Des attaques délibérées envers les civils et les infrastructures civiles sont commises.La situation au Yémen menace la stabilité de la région. Un Yémen stable et sûr, doté d’un gouvernement fonctionnel, est un objectif clé des efforts internationaux visant à combattre l’extrémisme et la violence dans la région et au-delà, mais est aussi essentiel pour la paix et la stabilité du pays.Face à cette situation, l’UE et les États membres sont prêts à intensifier leur aide humanitaire. Cette proposition souligne la nécessité de coordonner l’action humanitaire sous l’égide des Nations Unies. Elle appelle les parties à lever les obstacles à l’aide humanitaire. Elle rappelle que la crise ne pourra être résolue que par un processus de négociation ouvert à toutes les parties. Elle appelle les parties à cesser les attaques civiles et à respecter le droit humanitaire et le droit international en matière de droits de l’homme.
2016/11/22
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de Mme Le Grip sur la nécessité d’une stratégie de l’Union européenne pour éradiquer et prévenir l’écart entre les pensions des hommes et des femmes.L’écart de rémunération de retraite entre hommes et femmes étaient de 38 % en 2012 pour les personnes de 65 ans et plus. Les écarts de salaire entre hommes et femmes persistent dans l’UE en raison de discrimination et de ruptures dans les parcours professionnels.Ce rapport vise à élaborer une stratégie globale et généralisée. L’enjeu est de parvenir à une réelle égalité entre femmes et hommes, mais également de prévenir les situations de pauvreté et de vulnérabilité qui sont plus susceptibles de concerner les femmes ayant de faibles retraites.Il est nécessaire de développer les outils statistiques pour mieux distinguer les facteurs contribuant à cet écart. Un travail de sensibilisation sur la question est nécessaire.Il s’agit de favoriser l’équilibre de la vie professionnelle et de la vie privée, en assurant notamment les droits liés à la maternité et des structures d’accueil des enfants.Garantir la non-discrimination et lutter contre les écarts de rémunérations.Inciter les États à étudier et éviter les mécanismes de retraites qui favorisent les inégalités.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Serbia (A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport McAllister concernant la Serbie.Ce rapport effectue une étude de la situation en Serbie, dans le cadre de la promotion des valeurs européennes aux pays frontaliers de l’Union.Le Parlement salue l'engagement continu du gouvernement Serbe en faveur de l'intégration européenne. Les efforts en direction de l'implantation durable de l'état de droit et le respect des libertés fondamentales permettront un climat favorable aux négociations. Le respect des valeurs européennes est un facteur clef de l’approche européenne. Le rapport salue la mise en place d’une économie de marché fonctionnelle, qui impacte de manière positive, la situation économique globale du pays et des pays voisins. Le Parlement encourage la Serbie à renforcer la collaboration avec les États membres et les pays voisins. Le dialogue avec le Kosovo représente une grande avancée du processus de normalisation des relations entre ces deux pays. Des efforts restent à mener en ce qui concerne la liberté d’expression et la corruption.Le Parlement félicite la Serbie des progrès effectués, encourage de plus amples efforts et enfin, rassure la Serbie: les différends qui subsistent dans les accords bilatéraux ne menacent pas le processus d’adhésion.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on Kosovo (A8-0062/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la situation au Kosovo.Le Parlement se félicite de la mise en application des accords d’association (ASA) et de stabilisation entre l’Union et le Kosovo. Le Parlement salue le lancement du programme européen de réforme, notamment le retour des membres de l’opposition dans l’Assemblée, illustrant une revitalisation de la démocratie. Le rapport met en garde cependant, contre la polarisation de la vie politique qui peut nuire aux débats. La consolidation de l’état de droit, la plus grande indépendance du judiciaire, la libéralisation des médias et de la presse correspondent aux valeurs européennes. Le Parlement salue la lutte contre les extrémismes violents et la radicalisation et salue les efforts de normalisation des relations avec la Serbie.Des efforts doivent encore être entrepris au niveau des pratiques de corruption.L’Union est divisée sur la reconnaissance du Kosovo en tant que pays à part entière.
2016/11/22
2016 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0055/2017 - Ivo Vajgl) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport concernant l’ancienne République yougoslave de Macédoine. Le Parlement salue la conduite des élections législatives menées dans le respect des normes internationales et selon les recommandations du BIDDH et l’OSCE. Toutes les forces politiques doivent être mobilisées afin que le pays maintienne le cap vers une intégration à l’Union européenne. Pour se faire, des réformes d’envergure doivent aussi être menées, produisant des résultats concrets dans les domaines de l’état de droit, de la justice, de la corruption, des droits fondamentaux ou encore des affaires intérieures et les relations avec les pays voisins. Ces réformes découlent de l’accord Pržino et font partie des réformes prioritaires. Le pays doit mettre un terme avec le climat conflictuel qui avec l’absence d’une culture du compromis, nuisent aux débats démocratiques.Enfin, le rapport encourage la Macédoine à développer les mesures de confiance avec les États membres voisins, notamment la Grèce avec laquelle un rapprochement bilatéral est encouragé.
2016/11/22
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RC-B8-0397/2017, B8-0397/2017, B8-0398/2017, B8-0399/2017, B8-0400/2017, B8-0401/2017, B8-0402/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la proposition de résolution sur la situation en République démocratique du Congo (RDC).La dégradation de la situation en RDC est constante sur le plan politique et humanitaire, avec des violations massives et généralisées des droits de l’homme.Le gouvernement est resté inactif et n’a pas organisé d’élections.Des millions de personnes n’ont pas accès à l’eau potable, aux des services sanitaires, aux soins de santé et à l’éducation. L’insécurité alimentaire est très importante.La situation en RDC constitue une menace grave pour la stabilité de la région.Cette résolution souligne la nécessité pour l’UE et les États membres de maintenir leur assistance.Elle appelle l’UE à une enquête sur les violations des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire international afin d’identifier les responsables et leur demander des comptes. Elle demande l’organisation d’élections et rappelle au gouvernement son devoir de protéger les droits de l’homme et les libertés fondamentales.Le soutien de l’UE doit viser la démocratie et le renforcement de l’État.Elle propose la mise en place par l’UE et l’Union africaine d’un dialogue permanent entre les pays de la région des Grands Lacs pour éviter toute déstabilisation supplémentaire de la région.
2016/11/22
State of play of the implementation of the Sustainability Compact in Bangladesh (B8-0396/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la résolution sur l’état d’avancement de la mise en œuvre du pacte sur la durabilité au Bangladesh. Elle concerne l’accord relatif au Bangladesh et son renouvellement dans la perspective de la conférence de l’OIT en 2017.Le Bangladesh est devenu le deuxième producteur mondial de textile. Le prêt-à-porter a contribué de manière significative à la croissance économique et à la réduction de la pauvreté au cours de ces dernières années. Après l’effondrement du bâtiment Rana Plaza en 2013, la Commission, l’OIT et les États-Unis (rejoints plus tard par le Canada) ont conclu un «pacte sur la durabilité» qui vise à améliorer la sécurité et la santé au travail ainsi qu’à renforcer les droits des travailleurs dans le secteur du prêt-à-porter.Malgré la nette amélioration de la santé, de la sécurité et des conditions de travail dans les usines au cours de ces dernières années, les droits des travailleurs ont peu progressé. Elle demande au gouvernement de s’engager davantage en faveur du droit du travail et des conditions de travail et de promouvoir les libertés d’association et de négociation collective. Elle souligne l’importance de la sensibilisation des consommateurs pour plus de transparence et une consommation durable.
2016/11/22
Statelessness in South and South East Asia (A8-0182/2017 - Amjad Bashir) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de M.Bashir sur l’apatridie en Asie du Sud et en Asie du Sud-Est.Ce rapport se concentre particulièrement sur la situation des Rohingyas en Birmanie et des Biharis au Bangladesh.Les Rohingyas forment le plus grand groupe d’apatrides et sont également l’une des minorités les plus persécutées au monde.Au Bangladesh, l’année 2008 a marqué un tournant : la cour Suprême a rendu une décision obligeant le gouvernement à octroyer la citoyenneté aux Biharis. Malgré cela, ils sont aujourd’hui encore maltraités et contraints de vivre dans des camps. Des milliers d’entre eux vivent dans la pauvreté.Il vise à renforcer la coopération internationale dans la lutte contre l’apatridie, l’échange de bonnes pratiques entre les États et incite à l’adhésion aux conventions internationales sur l’apatridie. Il encourage à la production de données.Il s’agit pour l’Union Européenne d’élaborer une stratégie globale de lutte contre l’apatridie, avec à la fois des mesures d’urgence, et des mesures de long terme afin de mettre fin à l’apatridie.L’UE doit ainsi notamment réserver des fonds adéquats pour des ONG et d’autres organisations œuvrant en faveur des communautés d’apatrides et mettre en place un suivi des réalisations de l’Union.
2016/11/22
Cross-border mergers and divisions (A8-0190/2017 - Enrico Gasbarra) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du projet de rapport sur les fusions et scissions transfrontalières. Ce rapport souligne l’importance de la mobilité transfrontalière pour les entreprises et accueille les décisions entrepreneuriales justifiées. Ce rapport met en lumière l’efficacité de la directive 2005/56/CE sur les fusions transfrontalières. En effet, cette directive facilite les fusions transfrontalières, réduisant ainsi les coûts et procédures administratives connexes.Le rapport propose aussi la mise en place d’une directive formulée de telle sorte que les entreprises ne puissent plus avoir recours à la directive sur les fusions transfrontalières dans le seul but de transférer leur siège social pour des raisons fiscales, sociales ou juridiques abusives.
2016/11/22
Specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (A8-0070/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de Mme Mihaylova sur l’aménagement des règles du Fonds européen de développement régional (FEDER) pour les régions sinistrées par une catastrophe naturelle.Cette proposition vise à permettre l’adaptation de la politique de cohésion pour répondre à de nouveaux défis et offrir une réaction rapide à tous les États membres dont les régions sont frappées par des catastrophes naturelles.Ainsi à la suite des récents tremblements de terre en Italie, des régions ont été fortement touchées et d’importants efforts de reconstruction nécessaires.Dans de telles conditions, les États membres peuvent bénéficier d’une aide du Fonds de solidarité de l’Union Européenne (FSUE). Cette proposition vise à permettre un complément au soutien offert par le FSUE.Ce rapport propose d’adapter le cadre juridique afin de mieux répondre à ce type de situation.Il s’agit de créer un axe prioritaire distinct pour les projets de reconstruction soutenus par le FEDER, et faire en sorte que les programmes opérationnels liés à la reconstruction en réponse à des catastrophes naturelles puissent bénéficier d’un taux de cofinancement du FEDER de 95% (avec un plafond correspondant à 5% du budget total du FEDER).
2016/11/22
Status of fish stocks and socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean (A8-0179/2017 - Marco Affronte) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de M. Affronte sur l’état des stocks et la situation socio-économique du secteur de la pêche en Méditerranée.La situation des stocks de poissons en mer Méditerranée est inquiétante. Les ressources halieutiques y sont surexploitées et les données scientifiques les concernant insuffisamment développées. Cette situation menace l’activité des pêcheurs dans cette région sur le long terme. Les mesures actuelles de gestion se sont avérées insuffisantes pour remédier à ce problème; il convient donc d’en développer de nouvelles.Ce rapport s’inscrit dans le contexte d’une ambition politique récente et largement partagée pour améliorer la situation en Méditerranée.Ce rapport vise à établir une meilleure coopération avec les pays tiers, une plus grande sélectivité des engins de pêche ou encore un plus grand contrôle de la pêche illicite, non déclarée et non réglementée.Ce rapport pointe qu’une réglementation fondée uniquement sur les tailles minimales n’est pas suffisante pour réguler la pêche et appelle donc à mettre en place des mesures spatio-temporelles flexibles, associant objectifs de préservation des stocks, de gestion durable et de stabilité socio-économique.Le rapport propose également, comme mesure supplémentaire, de mettre en place des quotas pour certaines espèces lorsque cela est nécessaire.
2016/11/22
Rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals (A8-0189/2017 - Tom Vandenkendelaere) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de M. Vandenkendelaere sur le taux de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) appliqué aux livres, journaux et périodiques.Un taux de TVA réduit (5%) voire nul s’applique pour les versions papiers. Ce rapport vise à ce que les règles soient les mêmes pour le numérique. En effet, actuellement, les services fournis par voie électronique, dont les publications électroniques, doivent être taxés au taux de 15% minimum. Avec le développement de l’économie numérique, une telle différence de traitement entre les publications imprimées et électroniques est devenue de moins en moins justifiable.Cette modification doit donc permettre de clarifier les règles sur le marché des médias et de l’édition, d’aider les entreprises à proposer des nouveautés, de baisser les prix pour les consommateurs et de faciliter l’accès à la culture. La diffusion des contenus numériques culturels et créatifs joue en effet un rôle de plus en plus important dans l’accès aux biens culturels et permet aux auteurs et aux fournisseurs de contenus de toucher un public nouveau et plus large. Cette proposition doit ainsi stimuler l’innovation et l’investissement dans les contenus créatifs et améliorer l’accès du public aux biens culturels et au matériel pédagogique.
2016/11/22
Internet connectivity for growth, competitiveness and cohesion: European gigabit society and 5G (A8-0184/2017 - Michał Boni) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de M.Boni sur la connectivité internet pour la croissance, la compétitivité et la cohésion : société européenne du gigabit et 5G.La 5G sera vecteur d’innovation et de bouleversements économiques, créera de nouveaux usages, des services et produits de haute qualité, des sources de revenus et des modèles d’entreprise, et stimulera la compétitivité des entreprises.Ainsi, elle permettra le développement de l'internet des objets, des voitures autonomes, des services de santé en ligne et de la télémédecine, de nouvelles possibilités d'enseignement et d'apprentissage, les nouvelles possibilités de l'agriculture numérique et des villes intelligentes entre autres.La primauté européenne dans la technologie 5G est indispensable pour assurer la croissance économique et garantir la compétitivité à l’échelle mondiale.Le développement de la 5G nécessite une coordination et une planification au niveau européen.Il s’agit donc d’assurer les conditions du développement des infrastructures 5G.Un nouveau cadre réglementaire est nécessaire pour simplifier les réglementations, afin qu’elles soient favorables à l’investissement et à l’innovation. Un cadre clairement défini pour le développement des investissements. Une harmonisation des décisions sur le spectre radioélectrique.Éviter la fragmentation : notamment la question de la grande différence entre les zones rurales et urbaines.
2016/11/22
Protection of vulnerable adults (A8-0152/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la protection des adultes vulnérables.Les adultes vulnérables sont des personnes ayant atteint l’âge de 18 ans qui se trouvent en situation d’incapacité de gérer leur personne ou leur patrimoine. La majorité des personnes vulnérables sont des personnes d’âge avancé, plus susceptibles de perdre leurs facultés en raison des maladies liées à l’âge. Le nombre d’adultes vulnérables a fortement augmenté.L’objectif principal est de renforcer la communication et la coopération entre les États membres, par la mise en place de procédures pour l’échange et la comparaison de bonnes pratiques au sein de l’UE.Ce rapport propose des recommandations en soutien de la Convention de la Haye sur la protection des adultes du 13 janvier 2000. Il vise particulièrement à assurer le droit de libre circulation des personnes vulnérables entre les États membres et leur droit au libre établissement dans un État membre, en facilitant la diffusion, la reconnaissance et l’exécution par les autorités des États membres des mesures de protection prises en faveur d’un adulte vulnérable. Ainsi notamment faciliter la diffusion et la reconnaissance des mandats d’inaptitude, avec en particulier la proposition d’un formulaire européen unique de mandat d’inaptitude.
2016/11/22
Uniform format for visas (A8-0028/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la proposition de règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil modifiant le règlement (CE) n° 1683/1995 du Conseil, du 29 mai 1995, établissant un modèle type de visa.Ces dernières années, de fausses vignettes Visa sont apparues en Europe. La vignette actuelle n'est donc plus sécurisée. Afin de renforcer les dispositifs de sécurité et la lutte contre les contrefaçons, le rapport propose d'introduire un nouveau modèle de Visa. Le nouveau type de visa devrait contenir toutes les informations nécessaires et répondre à des normes techniques de très haut niveau, notamment en ce qui concerne les garanties contre la contrefaçon et la falsification. En outre, le modèle type doit aussi être adapté à son utilisation par tous les États membres et comporter des dispositifs de sécurité universellement reconnaissables qui soient visibles à l'œil nu. L'utilisation de nouvelles vignettes ne devrait pas induire de coûts supplémentaires.
2016/11/22
Digitising European industry (A8-0183/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport sur le passage au numérique des entreprises européennes de M.Bütikofer.Il est nécessaire de s’adapter aux nouvelles avancées le plus rapidement de façon durable et sociale. C’est le but de ce rapport. Permettre aux entreprises européennes de rester compétitives implique une adaptation par l’innovation.Ainsi, il s’agit de mettre en place une stratégie européenne intégrée de modernisation, sans laquelle ce passage risque d’être facteur de creusement des disparités au sein de l’Union. Un cadre législatif adapté doit donc permettre de meilleures conditions pour mieux saisir les opportunités (compétitivité, choix élargi pour les consommateurs entre autres) que peut apporter cette évolution.Pour ce faire, ce rapport recommande : la mise en place d’une coordination et une vision européennes, pour mobiliser les ressources et les parties prenantes, avec la création d’une instance européenne de coordination.Des conditions appropriées, en développant une infrastructure européenne de pointe, par l’investissement et par l’innovation.Une priorité de la sécurité comme spécificité européenne dans le développement des nouvelles technologies clés (notamment concernant la cybersécurité, la souveraineté des données et de normalisation).Un accroissement de la résilience sociale par les compétences, l’éducation et l’innovation sociale.
2016/11/22
The new European Consensus on Development - our world, our dignity, our future (B8-0387/2017, B8-0390/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport de M. Wenta sur la résolution sur le nouveau consensus européen sur le développement.Le consensus européen est un texte politique conjoint adopté par le Conseil, la Commission et le Parlement européen qui fixe les grandes orientations pour le développement. L’Union est le plus grand contributeur en matière de développement au monde et, avec ses États membres, représente plus de la moitié du montant global de l’aide publique au développement (APD).L’actuel consensus, adopté en 2005, nécessitait d’être adapté aux nouveaux objectifs de développement durable (ODD) adoptés au niveau des Nations unies en 2015 et aux nouveaux défis mondiaux.Le nouveau consensus européen élaboré souligne que l’objectif premier de la politique de développement reste:- la lutte contre la pauvreté;- la nécessité de combattre les inégalités;- l’importance de l’APD et l’objectif d’y allouer 0,7 % du PIB en 2030;- la nécessité de la cohérence des politiques européennes et de la coordination entre les actions au niveau européen et au niveau des États membres, mais également avec les autres donneurs et organisations;- le rôle crucial de la coopération au développement pour lutter contre les causes profondes des migrations;- l’importance du renforcement des liens entre sécurité et développement.
2016/11/22
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (B8-0381/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du projet de résolution 13 au sujet de la résilience en tant que priorité stratégique de la politique extérieure européenne.Compte tenu de l’importance de la résilience, qui permet de limiter l’impact négatif des chocs sur les populations, qu’ils soient d’origine climatique, sécuritaire ou encore alimentaire, renforcer la résilience de l’État et de la société des pays partenaires contribue à limiter les risques liés à certaines situations, permettant ainsi une récupération plus facile après une crise, assurant ainsi une continuité du développement.Des mécanismes de réponse plus efficaces et des capacités d’intervention plus rapides augmenteraient la résilience et éviteraient une trop grande déstabilisation liée aux conflits, pénuries alimentaires, épidémies ou encore catastrophes naturelles. Ces mesures doivent tout particulièrement protéger les plus vulnérables, les femmes, les enfants, les personnes LGBTQ etc.La résolution appelle à une plus grande collaboration entre le secteur privé et le secteur public, ce qui faciliterait la mobilisation de ressources. La résilience, de par son impact positif de prévention de risques et sa nature multidimensionnelle, doit se trouver au cœur de la politique stratégique extérieure.
2016/11/22
High-level UN Conference to support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (B8-0382/2017) FR

J’ai voté en faveur de la proposition de résolution concernant la conférence de haut niveau des Nations unies visant à soutenir la mise en œuvre de l’objectif de développement durable nº 14 (conférence des Nations unies sur l’océan).Les phénomènes climatiques actuels représentent une menace pour les organismes marins, illustrée par le rapide déclin de la richesse marine. Les milieux marins, déjà fragilisés par le réchauffement climatique et l’acidification des océans requièrent une gestion durable et écosystémique comme prévu par l’objectif de développement durable nº 14 des Nations unies. Il est nécessaire aujourd’hui de mettre en place des démarches de précaution, de reconstituer les stocks halieutiques et de faciliter la coopération régionale dans la gestion de la pêche facilitant ainsi l’exploitation durable.
2016/11/22
Achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East (RC-B8-0345/2017, B8-0345/2017, B8-0346/2017, B8-0347/2017, B8-0348/2017, B8-0352/2017, B8-0354/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant la coexistence de deux États au Proche-Orient. Le Parlement Européen condamne la violence et le terrorisme et toute action nuisant à la confiance entre les responsables politiques. Les attentats d'une part et l'occupation de territoires de l'autre nuisent à la perspective d'une paix durable. L'Union européenne cherche à s'unir afin de soutenir les négociations et la poursuite d'une solution pacifique, d'une paix juste, durable et généralisée.
2016/11/22
EU Strategy on Syria (RC-B8-0331/2017, B8-0331/2017, B8-0333/2017, B8-0335/2017, B8-0337/2017, B8-0338/2017, B8-0341/2017, B8-0342/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant la stratégie de l'Union européenne à l'égard de la Syrie. Au vu des dommages et violences infligées à la population ces 6 dernières années, l'Europe réitère son engagement pour une solution politique et une fin des hostilités tout en poursuivant la lutte contre l'État Islamique. Cette résolution dénonce les violations du Droit Humanitaire et appelle au respect de la dignité humaine en temps de conflit, comme le prévoit le droit international.
2016/11/22
Dadaab refugee camp (RC-B8-0300/2017, B8-0300/2017, B8-0332/2017, B8-0334/2017, B8-0336/2017, B8-0339/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la résolution concernant le camp de réfugiés de Dadaab. Les conditions d'accueil souffrent d'une surpopulation du camp qui risque de s'aggraver du fait du climat d'insécurité et de la famine. Cette crise humanitaire requiert la mobilisation de la communauté internationale notamment l'UE et demande aux États membres d'honorer leur engagement auprès de la Somalie.
2016/11/22
Making relocation happen (B8-0340/2017, B8-0343/2017, B8-0344/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la mesure visant à permettre la relocalisation de réfugiés se trouvant en Italie et en Grèce. Je soutiens l'effort de réponse humanitaire, cependant cette responsabilité doit être partagée entre états-membres comme le déclare cette résolution. Les États membres doivent respecter les obligations qui leur incombent c'est-à-dire de relocaliser les demandeurs d'asile admissibles tout en donnant priorité aux plus vulnérables tels que les mineurs non accompagnés.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Council's LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia (B8-0349/2017, B8-0349/2017, B8-0350/2017, B8-0351/2017, B8-0353/2017, B8-0355/2017, B8-0356/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du projet de résolution concernant la persecution des hommes homosexuels (perçus comme tels) en Tchétchénie (Russie). La résolution ordonne la libération immédiate des individus détenus. Tout en déplorant le climat d'impunité, l'Union européenne appelle la Russie et la Tchétchénie à enquêter, à poursuivre les responsables et, enfin, à veiller au respect des droits de l'homme et du principe de non-discrimination, conformément au droit national, européen et international.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2014 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0114/2017 - Sajjad Karim) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport annuel 2014 concernant la subsidiarité et la proportionnalité. Cette initiative place les principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité en tant que partie intégrante de l'élaboration des politiques de l'Europe. Ce rapport conclut sur le besoin d'accélérer la communication entre les parlements nationaux et les institutions européennes. Cette invitation au dialogue implique une collaboration plus efficace dans certains domaines d'action spécifiques et, enfin, permet une meilleure réponse aux objectifs de l'Europe vis-à-vis des citoyens.
2016/11/22
European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (B8-0298/2017) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du cadre européen des certifications pour l'apprentissage tout au long de la vie. Cette mesure permet d'améliorer le travail ainsi que les choix de vie disponibles à chacun.Cette mesure concernant l'apprentissage tout au long de la vie encourage la formation et égalise les chances en matière d'enseignement et ainsi facilite l'adaptation des compétences des travailleurs dans un monde du travail qui change rapidemment. La mesure met l'accent sur le numérique, domaine porteur d'emploi et d'innovation.
2016/11/22
Annual report 2015 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0159/2017 - Julia Pitera) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport sur la protection des intérêts financiers de l'Union européenne. Renforçant le système de détection des irrégularités frauduleuses, ce rapport appelle, entre autre, à la coopération entre États membres afin de lutter contre la fraude et la corruption. Il vise à protéger les lanceurs d'alerte et enfin met en place des mécanismes d'évaluation antérieurs à l'attribution de fonds européens afin de s'assurer que la contribution européenne tend vers les objectifs de l'UE et ne profite pas à des activités frauduleuses.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0093/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge concernant le Bureau européen d'appui en matière d'asile (EASO). Le Bureau forme et soutient les systèmes d'asile des États membres. L'organisation de soutien et d'assistance pour les besoins spécifiques ou non des institutions des États membres permet une sophistication des systèmes désormais plus à même de répondre aux situations de crise de façon efficace. L'EASO assure la cohérence des politiques d'asile, facilitée par la publication d'analyses de données recueillies à l'échelle européenne. Finalement, le Bureau dispose d'un bureau orienté vers l'extérieur qui apporte un soutien aux pays non membres de l'UE et offre des programmes de renforcement des institutions locales et régionales.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0079/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 62 concernant l'Autorité bancaire européenne (ABE). Cette agence vise à coordonner les mécanismes de surveillance des États et à améliorer le fonctionnement du marché intérieur en garantissant une surveillance et une règlementation harmonisée. L'ABE contribue à la création d'un ensemble de règles prudentielles et enquête sur l'application de la législation par les autorités nationales. De plus, l'ABE fonctionne en tant qu'organe de prise de décision en cas d'urgence et de médiateur entre autorités compétentes lors de situations transfrontalières.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0098/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 74 concernant l'Autorité Européenne de sécurité des aliments (EFSA). L'expertise fournie par le programme et les évaluations de l'EFSA élargissent les connaissances et la possibilité de contrôle et ainsi supportent la minimisation des risques biologiques et chimiques. Ces régulations et contrôles permettent d'assurer une consommation alimentaire saine et prévient les risques potentiels. Les évaluations et analyses de l'EFSA contribuent au developpement d'une base de données qui complètent le travail des agences à l'échelle nationale.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0106/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge concernant l'Institut européen pour l'égalité entre les hommes et les femmes. Cet institut se spécialise dans la collecte, l'analyse et le partage d'information sur les inégalités entre les hommes et les femmes. La base de données créée par l'institut est un outil utilisé par les femmes et hommes politiques lors du développement de programmes. Ce partage d'information contribute à la prise de decision informée et une mise en pratique ciblée visant à réduire les inégalités entre genre.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0084/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai vote en faveur de la décharge 79 concernant l'Agence Européenne des medicaments (EMA). L'EMA est charge de l'autorisation de la mise en circulation des medicaments quell que soit leur usqge (humain ou vétérinaire). le réseau de pharmacovigilance assure en permanence la sécurité des medicaments. Le contôle des effets indésirables t la prise de mesures appropriées lors d'une presence de risqué permet de prévenir la commercialisation de produits dote d'un équilibre risqué/benefices.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0099/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 83 concernant l'Observatoire européen des drogues et des toxicomanies(OEDT). L'OEDT rassemble et fournit une base d'information sur les drogues et effectue le suivi des solutions apportées aux problèmes soulevés par la drogue. L'OEDT évalue les risques liés aux substances psychoactives et enfin élabore et met à disposition des états-membres des outils pour évaluer leurs politiques nationales ainsi que les politiques à l'échelle européenne.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge concernant l'Agence européenne pour la sécurité maritime (AESM).Cette organisation vise à améliorer la sécurité maritime, ainsi que la prévention des pollutions et la réponse aux crises environnementales. Disposant d'un rôle principalement préventif, l'AESM contrôle l'application des actes législatifs et leur efficacité. L'Agence présente en outre une fonction réactive. La mise à disposition de navires dépollueurs lors de marées noires, ou encore d'appareils de détection de pollution maritime (notamment satellite) permet de mieux répondre aux crises. Finalement, l'AESM fournit des informations aux gouvernements, poursuit des investigations les activités en mer et, enfin, diffuse les bonnes pratiques en matière de sécurité et d'environnement.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0124/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 60 concernant l'Autorité européenne des marchés financiers (AEMF). L'Autorité veille au bon fonctionnement des marchés financiers, promeut leur stabilité et, enfin, protège les investisseurs. Cette institution assure la coordination des mesures de surveillance des valeurs mobilières ainsi que la cohérence des mesures d'urgence en cas de crise sur les marchés financiers.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0118/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 77 concernant la Fondation Européenne pour la Formation (ETF). Afin de faciliter la réponse aux nouveaux besoins du marché du travail, l'ETF cherche à améliorer et développer la formation, qu'elle soit initiale ou tout au long de la vie. Un accès aux formations permettrait une meilleure intégration ou ré-intégration dans le marché du travail. L'ETF permet de developer la coopération entre états partenaires et encourage la mobilité des instructeurs. Ces réformes et mesures visent à accoître l'employabilité des populations, notamment les jeunes, en fonction des besoins du marché du travail.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0107/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge 64 concernant l'Office Européen de Police (EUROPOL). EUROPOL consolide les États membres dans leur lutte contre le crime organisé et le terrorisme. EUROPOL assure un rôle de soutien aux polices nationales et représente un centre d'expertise et d'information sur les activités criminelles. EUROPOL fournit des analyses et rapports détaillés dans lesquels sont recensés les menaces émergentes ainsi que les organisations criminelles et leur structure. EUROPOL recense des informations sur de vastes sujets de la cybercriminalité à la propriété intellectuelle ou encore le terrorisme et les groupes criminels organisés.
2016/11/22
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0137/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de la décharge concernant l'Agence européenne pour la gestion de la coopération opérationnelle aux frontières extérieures des États membres de l'Union européenne (Frontex). Les pays membres se doivent de déployer des ressources aux frontières de l'espace Schengen. FRONTEX assure l'uniforme contrôle en périphérie de la zone de libre circulation ainsi que la coordination d'opérations de contrôle entre États. Cette harmonisation du contrôle aux frontières permet de lutter contre le crime transnational tout en facilitant le légitime passage des frontières.
2016/11/22
Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 (A8-0046/2017 - Ernest Urtasun) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport d'initiative de mon collègue Urtasun qui évalue la situation de l'égalité des sexes 2014-2015 dans l'Union européenne et fournit des données montrant clairement que l'UE est à mi-chemin vers la réalisation de cette égalité. Malgré les progrès accomplis dans ce domaine, beaucoup reste à faire pour réduire les écarts salariaux: supprimer le "plafond de verre" existant sur les carrières des femmes, remédier au manque d'indépendance économique, améliorer leur équilibre professionnel et combattre la violence et les stéréotypes.
2016/11/22
Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport de ma collègue Agniezka Kozlowska-Rajewicz qui constitue une analyse sectorielle globale de la mise en œuvre de la directive 2004/113 /CE qui garantit le principe de l'égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes dans le domaine de l'accès aux biens et services et de leurs fournitures. Le projet de rapport souligne les lacunes persistantes dans la mise en œuvre de cette directive dans les secteurs tels que les transports et les assurances. De même, il met en lumière la protection insuffisante des femmes lors des grossesses et maternités. Il recommande également de renforcer l'intégration de la dimension de genre dans les secteurs qui relèvent de la directive et de renforcer l'application de la directive aux services fournis dans le cadre de l'économie collaborative.
2016/11/22
EU funds for gender equality (A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport MOODY. Le rapport d'initiative souligne que la dimension d’égalité hommes-femmes n’est prise en compte que sporadiquement dans la répartition des budgets de l’Union et dans les décisions relatives aux dépenses. Il met aussi en avant la nécessité d’intégrer la question de l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes dans les objectifs stratégiques transversaux. Il déplore en outre que le principe de l’intégration de cette dimension d’égalité hommes-femmes ne soit pas encore internalisé dans la répartition des budgets et dans les décisions relatives aux dépenses pour tous les domaines d’action de l’Union.
2016/11/22
EU-Lebanon Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0027/2017 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport Mănescu sur l'accord euro-med UE-Liban. L’accord euro-méditerranéen instituant une association entre la Communauté européenne et ses États membres, d'une part, et la République libanaise, d'autre part, a créé une relation renforcée dans le contexte du partenariat euro-méditerranéen institué par la déclaration de Barcelone. Cet accord contient notamment les éléments suivants : un dialogue politique, économique, social et culturel régulier, l’établissement progressif d’une zone de libre-échange entre la Communauté européenne et le Liban sur une période maximale de douze ans, conformément à la réglementation de l’OMC, ainsi que la création d’un conseil d’association et d’un comité d’association. L’accord a été signé à Luxembourg le 17 juin 2002 et est entré en vigueur le 1er avril 2006. Conformément aux conditions de l'acte d'adhésion de la Croatie, l'adhésion de celle-ci à l'accord doit être approuvée par la conclusion d'un protocole à l'accord entre le Conseil, agissant au nom de l'Union et statuant à l'unanimité au nom des États membres, et le Liban. Le Conseil ne peut adopter l'acte qu'après avis favorable du Parlement européen.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (A8-0030/2017 - Silvia Costa) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport de ma collègue Silva Costa sur la mise en oeuvre du programme "Europe Creative". Le programme est constitué de deux sous-programmes distincts, «Culture» et «MEDIA», et d’un volet transsectoriel comprenant un nouvel instrument financier, le mécanisme de garantie. Le sous-programme «MEDIA» comprend une série de mesures d’appui et le sous-programme «Culture» s’articule autour de quatre mesures. Le sous-programme «Culture» est complété par un ensemble de mesures spécifiques, telles que des prix culturels européens (pour la littérature, l’architecture contemporaine, le prix Border Breakers pour la musique et le patrimoine culturel) et des initiatives: les capitales européennes de la culture et le label du patrimoine européen.«Europe créative» permet de développer une masse critique par le renforcement des secteurs culturels, créatifs et audiovisuels.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme (A8-0017/2017 - María Teresa Giménez Barbat) FR

J'ai voté en faveur de ce rapport sur la mise en œuvre du programme «L'Europe pour les citoyens». Ce programme vise à permettre aux citoyens de mieux comprendre l’Union européenne, son histoire et sa diversité. La structure du programme a été révisée pour la nouvelle période de programmation; celui-ci se compose désormais de deux volets («Travail de mémoire européen» et «Engagement démocratique et participation civique», prévoyant des mesures telles que le jumelage de villes, des réseaux de villes et des projets de la société civile) et d’une action horizontale dont le but est l’analyse, la diffusion et l’exploitation des résultats des projets. Le principal sujet de préoccupation est le budget pour la période 2014-2020 (185 millions d’euros), qui a été réduit de 14 % par rapport à la génération précédente du programme.
2016/11/22
Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives (A8-0012/2017 - Emma McClarkin) FR

J’ai voté en faveur du rapport MacClarkin.Ce rapport analyse les relations entre la bonne mise en œuvre des ALE (en particulier de leurs chapitres relatifs au développement durable, de leurs chapitres relatifs aux procédures douanières extérieures et à la facilitation des échanges, et des dispositions actuelles et futures sur la bonne gouvernance et la lutte contre la corruption), les régimes de préférence commerciale tels que le SPG+, les flux d’investissement, les chaînes de valeur mondiales et la promotion de normes en matière de responsabilité sociale pour les entreprises.En outre, les aspects externes de la réglementation et de la gestion des douanes dans le cadre de la préservation des espèces sauvages sont examinés. De plus, le rapport se penche sur la situation actuelle de ces problématiques et sur l’importance qui leur est accordée dans le cadre de l’OMC et de ses comités sectoriels compétents, qui prennent part à l’actuelle réflexion engagée parmi les États membres en ce qui concerne les futurs travaux de l’organisation à la suite de l’achèvement de la dixième conférence ministérielle de Nairobi et de la prochaine entrée en vigueur de l’accord sur la facilitation des échanges de l’OMC, qui ouvre de nouvelles possibilités de coopération dans de nombreux domaines pertinents.
2016/11/22
A European Pillar of Social Rights (A8-0391/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues) FR

J'ai voté en faveur du rapport RODRIGUES sur la mise en œuvre d'un socle européen des droits sociaux. Même si quelques points et propositions du rapport restent à améliorer et ne constituaient pas des éléments centraux, la consolidation de l'acquis social européen et la nécessité d'avancer et d'encadrer une économie sociale de marché sont essentielles pour nos citoyens aujourd'hui. Je suis en faveur d'une Europe sociale et solidaire, nous devons continuer ce travail.
2016/11/22

Written questions (18)

EU support following the fire at the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris PDF (45 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Trade policy and agriculture PDF (103 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Definition of mechanically separated meat in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 PDF (102 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(16 KB)
African swine fever - --current situation in Europe and measures taken by the EU and its Member States PDF (5 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Actions against foie gras PDF (194 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(194 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Health crisis in French and European poultry production and market measures PDF (104 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(104 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Request for investigation into payment of EU funds in the Poitou-Charentes region PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Health and safety policy concerning female migrants and asylum seekers in refugee camps PDF (95 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(95 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Qualifying conditions for the Winter Fuel Payment PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Maltese authorities' visa issuing policy and risk to the Schengen Area PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Progress made in the implementation of the Recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships PDF (198 KB) DOC (30 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(30 KB)
European Patients' Rights Day PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Combatting vine wood diseases PDF (102 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(102 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Taking account of the specific circumstances of the outermost island regions in the Erasmus+ Programme PDF (6 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Difficulties with CAP implementation PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(6 KB) DOC(24 KB)
Social security benefit and beneficiaryʼs country of residence PDF (101 KB) DOC (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(101 KB) DOC(24 KB)
VP/HR - Diplomatic initiatives to save Asia Bibi PDF (100 KB) DOC (27 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(100 KB) DOC(27 KB)
Europe for Citizens Programme - town twinning PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(5 KB) DOC(23 KB)

Written declarations (8)

Written declaration on the protection of the children of imprisoned parents

Written declaration on promoting religious freedom in Pakistan and condemning the unjustified detention of Ms Asia Bibi

Written declaration on the importance of jobs and workers’ rights in the EU

Written declaration on improving the early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases among women

Written declaration on education and employment for persons with autism spectrum disorders and similar challenges

Written declaration on the European Year for Reconciling Work and Family Life

2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(90 KB) DOC(46 KB)
Authors: Marian HARKIN, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Roberta ANGELILLI, Jutta STEINRUCK

Amendments (1307)

Amendment 33 #

2018/2080(INI)


Recital 10
(10) Whereas provisions should be laid down regarding the officials and servants of the Ombudsman´s secretariat which will assist him and the budget thereof; whereas the seat of the Ombudsman should be that of the seat of the European Parliament;
2018/10/19
Committee: PETI
Amendment 77 #

2018/2080(INI)


Article 13
The seat of the Ombudsman shall be that of the seat of the European Parliament.
2018/10/19
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the overall year-on-year increase proposed by the Commission in the appropriations of heading 1 – Smart and inclusive growth (+3.91 % in commitment appropriations and +1,83 % in payment appropriations);
2018/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Acknowledges the modest increase proposed by the Commission in the appropriations of heading1b - Economic, social and territorial cohesion (+2,8 % in commitment appropriations and +1,1% in payment appropriations);
2018/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the proposal to increase the commitment appropriations for the FEAD and the EGF (+2% for each); regrets, however, the decrease (-60%) of the payment appropriations for the EGF, as well as the decreases (respectively 1.5% and -0.4%) of the commitment and payment appropriation for the EaSI; stresses that the commitment appropriations for 'Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship' will have to be maintained at an ambitious level;
2018/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses, furthermore, that the budget lines supporting European social dialogue and measures for social partners are of prime importance when it comes to strengthening social partners’ involvement, for example in the European Semester and the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights; and thuscknowledges the slight increase in commitment appropriations (6,4%) but regrets the decrease in payment appropriations (- 21.8%) proposed by the Commission as regards industrial relations and social dialogue;
2018/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the creation of the European Labour Authority, which is expected to begin operating in 2019; highlights the need to provide for additional funding to ensure that sufficient financial resources are set aside for its establishment; regrets that the funding proposed by the Commission (EUR 11 million, appropriations are to be entered into the reserve until such time as the basic act is adopted by the legislator) is of a lower magnitude than the one of other EU agencies in the area of employment and social affairs; insists that this funding cannot be accomplished by redeploying allocations from the other employment and social affairs agencies; notes that the EURES portal will gradually be shifted under the ELA in 2019 and 2020 and calls for assurance that this transfert of activities does not lead neither to any cut in the EURES budget nor to any disruptions in the functionning of the portal;
2018/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the 2019 budget should contribute towards achieving the Europe 2020 targets in the social and employment area, which are furthest from being achieved, and a successful implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, particularly when it comes to combating youth and long-term unemployment, rising inequalities, social exclusion and poverty; stresses, in this regard, that the 2019 budget cannot be understood outside the context of the 2014- 2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF);
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that robust recovery and, sustainable growth and structural reforms are key factors to creating quality jobs, increasing prosperity and boosting upward social convergence, and that the European structural and investment funds should be directed more effectively towards creating employment, promoting inclusive growth, fostering social cohesion and, reducing inequalities and promoting upskilling measures and life-long-learning;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the importance of adequate funding for the programmes and initiatives within the 2014-2020 MFF that seek to address unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, and especially those aimed at the most disadvantaged in society, such as the European Social Fund (ESF), the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the various axes of the Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI), the separate budget lines supporting European social dialogue and workers’ organisationmeasures towards social partners, and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD); insists, therefore, that the resources of these programmes should be increased for the 2019 budget, or at least maintained at the levels of the previous year;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Expects the 2019 budget to continue demonstrating great ambition to fight youth unemployment; calls on the continuation of efforts to improve the implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative, by ensuring that the offers of employment, education or training match with participant profiles and labour market demand in order to place participants in sustainable employment;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Sees that the low absorption rate is partly due to administrative barriers; calls therefore further reduction of administrative barriers to improve the access to funds;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that the principle of proportionality must prevail in the management and control of structural programs; calls on the Commission and the Member States to explore the possibilities of an online system of application more conducive to administrative simplification for project managers;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2018/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission, in line with the ECA Special Report 06/2018, to better identify and monitor funding addressed to labour mobility in the scope of EaSI and ESF, to ensure complementarity and better performance monitoring of the funds, and hence their efficient and effective use;
2018/05/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2018/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Takes note of the lack of data availability in the field of matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility; encourages the Commission to include such data in the EU Justice Scoreboard when made available by the Member States, possibly as a midterm objective to be put in place after completion of the review of the Council Regulation No 2201/2003 on Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility and on international child abduction";
2018/03/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #

2018/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Additional instruments are therefore necessary to avoid the possibility in the future that large asymmetric shocks will result into deeper and broader situations of stress and weaken economic, social, and territorial cohesion.
2018/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2018/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The activation of EISF support should therefore be determined by a double activation trigger based on both the level of national unemployment rate compared to its past average and the change in unemployment compared to a certain threshold. The formula for calculating the amount of EISF loan support should also take into account the trend in the youth unemployment rate in the Member State requesting support.
2018/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2018/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) employment, unemployment rate, youth unemployment rate, participation rates, indicators of part time employment, hours worked;
2018/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) On 17 November 2017, the European Pillar of Social Rights was jointly proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission as a response to social challenges in Europe. The twenty key principles of the pillar are structured around three categories: equal opportunities and access to the labour market; fair working conditions; social protection and inclusion. The twenty principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights should guide the actions under the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). In order to contribute to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights the ESF+ should support investments in people and systems in the policy areas of employment, education and social inclusion, thereby supporting economic, territorial and social cohesion in accordance with Article 174 TFEU. All actions under the ESF+ should respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The Union is confronted with structural challenges arising from economic globalisation, the management of migration flows and the increased security threat, clean energy transition, technological change, unemployment in general and youth unemployment, and an increasingly ageing workforce and growing skills and labour shortages in some sectors and regions, experienced especially by SMEs. Taking into account the changing realities of the world of work, the Union should be prepared for the current and future challenges by investing in relevant skills, making growth more inclusive and by improving employment and social policies, including in view of labour mobility.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The ESF+ shouldGiven that it is the main Union instrument focused on employment and skills, it is essential that the ESF+ is able to contribute to social, economic, and territorial cohesion in all parts of Europe. To that end it must provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences, notably as regards digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ shouldmust help progression within education and training and transition to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This couldan be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Given the differences in levels of development within Europe as a whole, ESF+ assistance must always be flexible enough to allow for specific regional and territorial characteristics.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The ESF+ should support policy and system reforms in the fields of employment, social inclusion, healthcare and long-term care, and education and training. In order to strengthen alignment with the European Semester, Member States should allocate an appropriate amount of their resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to implement relevant country-specific recommendations relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual investments falling within the scope of the ESF+. The Commission and the Member States should ensure coherence, coordination and complementarity between the shared- management and Health strands of ESF+ and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument, as well as the European Pillar of Social Rights. In particular, the Commission and the Member States should ensure, in all stages of the process, effective coordination in order to safeguard the consistency, coherence, complementarity and synergy among sources of funding, including technical assistance thereof.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Disparities are growing at subregional level, including in more prosperous regions where there are pockets of poverty.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) In light of the persistently high levels of child poverty and social exclusion in the EU (26.4% in 2017), and the European Pillar of Social Rights which states that children have the right to protection from poverty, and children from disadvantaged backgrounds have the rights to specific measures to enhance equal opportunities; Member States should allocate appropriate amount of ESF+ resources under shared management for the reduction of child poverty and social exclusion. Investing early in children yields significant returns for children and society as a whole. Supporting children to develop skills and capabilities enables them to develop their full potential, become active members of society and increase their chances on the labour market as young people.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF+ depends on good governance and partnership between all actors at the relevant territorial levelthe European institutions and national, regional, and local authorities and the socio- economic actors, in particular the social partners and civil society. It is therefore essential that Member States encourage the participation of sinvolve regional and locial partners and civil societyauthorities in the implementation of the ESF+ under shared management. , while also encouraging the participation of social partners and civil society.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The Member States and the Commission should ensure that ESF+ contributes to the promotion of equality between women and men in accordance with Article 8 TFEU to foster equality of treatment and opportunities between women and men in all areas, including regarding participation in the labour market, terms and conditions of employment and career progression. They should also ensure that the ESF+ promotes equal opportunities for all, without discrimination in accordance with Article 10 TFEU and promotes the inclusion in society of persons with disabilities on equal basis with others and contributes to the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. These principles should be taken into account in all dimensions and in all stages of the preparation, monitoring, implementation and evaluation of programmes, in a timely and consistent manner while ensuring that specific actions are taken to promote gender equality and equal opportunities. The ESF+ should also promote the transition from residential/institutional care to family and community-based care, in particular for those who face multiple discrimination. The ESF+ should not support any action that contributes to segregation or to social exclusion. Regulation (EU) No [future CPR] provides that rules on eligibility of expenditure are to be in line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and established at national level, with certain exceptions for which it is necessary to lay down specific provisions with regard to the ESF+ strand under shared management.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) Pursuant to Article [94 of Council Decision 2013/755/EU19], persons and entities established in Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) are to be eligible for funding subject to the rules and objectives of the Employment and Social Innovation and Health strands and possible arrangements applicable to the Member State to which the relevant OCTs are linked. The programme will need to allow for the particular constraints affecting persons and entities established in those territories in order to provide for proper access to those strands. __________________ 19 Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union ( ‘Overseas Association Decision’) (OJ L 344, 19.12.2013, p. 1).
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) 'most deprived persons' means natural persons, whether individuals, families, households or groups composed of such persons, including children whose need for assistance has been established according to the objective criteria set by the national competent authorities in consultation with relevant stakeholders, while avoiding conflicts of interest and which are approved by those national competent authorities and which may include elements that allow the targeting of the most deprived persons in certain geographical areas;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new)
(18a) ‘overseas countries and territories’ means overseas countries and territories to which the provisions of Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union apply and which are listed in Annex II to that Treaty;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The ESF+ aims to support Member States to effectively eradicate poverty, including child poverty and fight social exclusion, advance equality and non-discrimination, achieve high employment levels, fair social protection and a skilled and resilient workforce ready for the future world of work, in line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 17 November 2017.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The ESF+ aims to support Member States, at national, regional and local level, to achieve high employment levels, fair social protection and a skilled and resilient workforce ready for the future world of work, in line with the principles set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 17 November 2017.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
The ESF+ shall support, complement and add value to the policies of the Member States to ensure equal opportunities, access to the labour market, fair working conditions, social protection and, poverty eradication, including child poverty, social inclusion, and a high level of human health protection.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) under shared management, whereby the programming and implementation shall be delegated to the Member States and the regions, for the part of the assistance which corresponds to the specific objectives indicated in Article 4(1) (the ‘ESF+ strand under shared management’), and
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The ESF+ shall support the following specific objectives in the policy areas of employment, education, mobility, social inclusion and health and thereby also contributing to the policy objective for “A more social Europe - Implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights” set out in Article [4] of the [future CPR]:
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iii
(iii) promoting women’s labour market participation, a better work/life balance including equal access to childcareinclusive and non-segregated quality early childhood education and care and to other community-based services for children, a healthy and well–adapted working environment addressing health risks, adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change, and active and healthy ageing;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point vii
(vii) fostering active social inclusion with a view to promoting equal opportunities and active participation, and improving employability;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point viii a (new)
(viiia) promoting equal opportunities for all European citizens, including the most remote, by supporting mobility.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 386 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The part of the financial envelope for the ESF+ strand under shared management under the Investment for Jobs and Growth goal shall be EUR 100 000 000 000 in current prices or EUR 88 646 194 590 in 2018 prices of which EUR 200 000 000 in current prices or EUR 175 000 000 in 2018 prices shall be allocated for transnational cooperation supporting innovative solutions as referred to in Article 23(i) and EUR 400 000 000 in current prices or EUR 376 928 934 in 2018 prices as additional funding to the outermost regions identified in Article 349 TFEU and the NUTS level 2 regions fulfilling the criteria laid down in Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession. The specific allocation for the outermost regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU provides for compensation of the additional costs connected with one or more permanent constraints hampering their development. In particular, it supports mobility actions.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 502 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall ensure adequate participation of regional and local authorities, social partners and civil society organisations in the delivery of employment, education and social inclusion policies supported by the ESF+ strand under shared management.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 534 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Regulation No 2018/0206
Article 11 – paragraph 1
The actions addressing the challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations and in the European Semester as referred to in Article 7(2) shall be programmed under one or more dedicated priorities. Member States and, where appropriate the Commission, shall foster synergies and ensure coordination, complementarity and coherence between these specific priorities and the European Pillar of Social Rights.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the cessation of activity of more than 2500 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, in an enterprise in a Member State, including where that cessation applies in its suppliers or downstream producers;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the cessation of activity of more than 2500 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of six months, particularly in SMEs, where all operate in the same economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level or in more than two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level provided that there are more than 2500 workers or self-employed persons affected in two of the regions combined;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the cessation of activity of more than 2500 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, particularly in SMEs, operating in the same or different economic sectors defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in the same region defined at NUTS 2 level.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. In small labour markets, in the outermost regions, or in exceptional circumstances, in particular with regard to applications involving SMEs or VSEs, where duly substantiated by the applicant Member State, an application for a financial contribution under this Article may be considered admissible even if the criteria laid down in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met, when the redundancies have a serious impact on employment and the local or regional economy. The applicant Member State shall specify which of the intervention criteria set out in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met. The aggregated amount of contributions in exceptional circumstances may not exceed 15 % of the annual ceiling of the EGF.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall implement information and communication activities on EGF cases and outcomes based on its experience, with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the EGF and ensuring that Union citizens and workerscitizens, workers, the Union’s social partners, and the stakeholders or authorities whose responsibility it is to activate the EGF know about the EGFfund.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of these reform priorities. These strategies should be presented alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and Union funding. They should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the Funds, the European Investment Stabilisation Function and InvestEU. In general, Member States and, where appropriate, the Commission should foster synergies and ensure coordination, complementarity and coherence between these specific priorities and the European Pillar of Social Rights.
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) There ought to be provision for use to be made of regional indicators so that subregional disparities can be taken into account more effectively.
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) In full respect of the applicable State aid and public procurement rules already clarified during the 2014-2020 programming period, the managing authorities should have the possibility to decide on the most appropriate implementation options for financial instruments in order to address the specific needs of target regions. Furthermore, the undoubted consequences - at national and, above all, subnational level - of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU might make it necessary to apply state aid rules with sufficient flexibility to ensure that certain critical situations can be dealt with.
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48 a (new)
(48a) The Commission and Member States ought to explore the scope for an online application system for project managers that is more conducive to administrative simplification.
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) To ensure an appropriate balance between the effective and efficient implementation of the Funds and the related administrative costs and burdens, the frequency, scope and coverage of management verifications should be based on a risk assessment that takes account of factors such as the type of operations implemented, the beneficiaries as well as the level of risk identified by previous management verifications and audits. Management and control of the Funds should be governed by the principle of proportionality in relation to the level of risk to the budget of the Union. .
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 66 a (new)
(66a) It should be pointed out that the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union will have an asymmetrical impact on local and regional authorities, depending both on the economic sectors involved, such as fisheries, agriculture and, above all, port activities, and on the particular regions and Member States concerned. The fact is that some regions and Member States are more exposed to economic risks because of the nature and extent of their trading links with the United Kingdom. Making use of the specific budget heading created in 2001 to help border regions in their dealings with prospective Member States should be looked into as a way of providing a stabilisation fund to mitigate the economic consequences of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal. Furthermore, in the light of the challenges posed by Brexit at local and regional level, there will need to be ongoing cooperation involving exchanges of good practices at local and regional authority level.
2018/10/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) In line with Article 349 TFEU and the Commission's communication on 'A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the Union's outermost regions'36, the Programme should take into account the specific situation of these regions. Measures will be taken to increase the outermost regions' effective participation in all actions. Mobility exchanges and cooperation between people and organisations from these regions and third countries, in particular their neighbours, should be fostered. Such measures will be monitored and evaluated regularly. _________________ 36 COM(2017) 623 final.
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 283 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) Pursuant to [reference to be updated as appropriate according to a new Decision on OCTs Article 94 of the Council Decision 2013/755/EC37], individuals and entities established in overseas countries or territories are eligible for funding subject to the rules and objectives of the Programme and possible arrangements applicable to the Member State to which the relevant overseas country or territory is linked. The constraints imposed by the remoteness of these countries or territories should beall be duly taken into account when implementing the Programme, and theirin particular by establishing financial allocations which take account of travel costs or by promoting exchange and cooperation with neighbouring third countries as part of this mobility programme, and their effective participation in the Programme should be monitored and regularly evaluated. _________________ 37 Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union ('Overseas Association Decision') (OJ L 344, 19.12.2013, p. 1).
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 359 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) 'transnational' relates to any action involving at least two countries which are either Member States or overseas countries or territories coming under the authority of a Member State, or third countries associated to the Programme;
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 382 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
(26) ‘national authority' means the authority in charge, at national level, of monitoring and supervising the management of the Programme in a Member State, in overseas countries and territories coming under the authority of a Member State, or in a third country associated to the Programme;
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 385 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27
(27) 'national agency' means one or more bodies in a given Member State or, in an overseas country or territory coming under the authority of a Member State, or in a third country associated to the Programme in charge of managing the implementation of the Programme at national level. There may be more than one national agency in a given Member State or, including in an overseas country or territory coming under the authority of that Member State, or in a third country associated to the Programme.
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 444 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) partnerships for excellence, in particular European universities, Centres of vocational excellence and joint master degrees; the principal objective of which is to increase the attractiveness of higher-education establishments in the European Union by encouraging cooperation between the research, innovation and education domains, centres of vocational excellence and joint master degrees; partnerships for excellence shall involve at least one Member State.
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 495 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
In the field of sport, the Programme shall support, under key action 1, the mobility of sport coaches and staff. It shall also support the mobility of amateur athletes, in connection with competitions, in particular in remote, island or outermost regions and overseas countries and territories coming under the authority of a Member State.
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 547 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 5 a (new)
(5a) An indicative amount of [EUR 4 000 000 000, of which at least ….% is allocated by way of support for the European universities initiative, representing 16% of the total amount for paragraph 2] for other actions under Chapter II, with the exception of those referred to in points (1) to (5) of paragraph 2(a).
2018/11/16
Committee: CULT
Amendment 248 #

2018/0190(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Pursuant to Article 94 of Council Decision 2013/755/EU28 , persons and entities established in overseas countries and territories are eligible for funding subject to the rules and objectives of the Programme and possible arrangements applicable to the Member State to which the relevant overseas country or territory is linked. The constraints imposed by the remoteness of these countries or territories should be taken into account when implementing the Programme, and their effective participation monitored and regularly evaluated. __________________ 28 Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (Overseas Association Decision) (OJ L 344, 19.12.2013, p. 1).
2018/11/30
Committee: CULT
Amendment 479 #

2018/0190(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) European networks of cultural and creative organisations from different countriesMember States, including overseas countries and territories of a Member State;
2018/11/30
Committee: CULT
Amendment 510 #

2018/0190(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The priorities of the MEDIA strand of the Programme referred to in Article 5 shall take into account the differences across countriesMember States and overseas countries and territories of a Member State regarding audiovisual content production, distribution, and access, as well as the size and specificities of the respective markets and shall be pursued through, inter alia:
2018/11/30
Committee: CULT
Amendment 528 #

2018/0190(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) Promote European works in industry events and fairs in Europe, in the overseas countries and territories of a Member State and beyond;
2018/11/30
Committee: CULT
Amendment 100 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 a – paragraph 1
1a. The Member State of destination may require a company which is transferring its registered office to its territory to simultaneously relocate its central administration, where this requirement is laid down in national legislation for undertakings established in their territory.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – Title
Report of the management or administrative organ to the members and employees
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 1
1. The management or administrative organ of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion shall draw up a report for the members and employees explaining and justifying the legal and economic aspects of the cross-border conversion.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) the implications of the cross- border conversion for the safeguarding of employment relationships;
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) any material changes in the conditions of employment and in the location of the companies’ places of business;
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
(cc) whether the factors set out in points (a), (ca) and (cb) affect any subsidiaries of the company.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 3
3. The report referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, shall be made available, at least electronically, to the members not less than two months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i. That report shall also be made similarly available to theand representatives of the employees of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion or, where there are no such representatives, to the employees themselves, not less than two months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Where the management or administrative organ of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion receives, in good time, an opinion from the representatives of its employees or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves, as provided for under national law, the members shall be informed thereof and that opinion shall be appended to that report.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 4
4. However, that report shall not be required where allt least two thirds of the members of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion have agreed to waive this requirement.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. However, where a company carrying out a cross-border conversion and its subsidiaries, if any, have no employees other than those who form part of the management or administrative organ, the report referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be required.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Paragraphs 1 to 4 are without prejudice to the applicable information and consultation rights and procedures instituted at national level in response to the transposition of Directive 2002/14/EC or 2009/38/EC.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 f
Article 86f Report of tdeleted The management or administrative organ to the employees 1. organ of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion shall draw up a report explaining the implications of the cross-border conversion for employees. 2. paragraph 1 shall in particular explain the following: (a) border conversion on the future business of the company and on the management's strategic plan; (b) the implications of the cross- border conversion on the safeguarding of employment relationships; (c) any material changes in the conditions of employment and in the location of the company’s places of business; (d) points (a), (b) and (c) also relate to any subsidiaries of the company. 3. paragraph 1 of this Article, shall be made available, at least electronically, to the representatives of the employees of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion or, where there are no such representatives, to the employees themselves not less than two months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i. That report shall also be made similarly available to the members of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion. 4. Where the management or administrative organ of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion receives, in good time, an opinion from the representatives of their employees or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves, as provided for under national law, the members shall be informed thereof and that opinion shall be appended to that report. 5. carrying out the cross-border conversion and its subsidiaries, if any, have no employees other than those who form part of the management or administrative organ, the report referred to in pThe report referred to in the implications of the cross- whether the factors set out in The report referred to in However, where a company Paragraphs 1 shall not be required. 6. prejudice to the applicable information and consultation rights and proceedings instituted at national level following the transposition of Directives 2002/14/EC or 2009/38/EC.to 6 are without
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – title
Article 86g Examination by an independent expertthe competent authority
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 1 – point 3
1. Member States shall ensure that the company carrying out the cross-border conversion applies not less than two months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i to the competent authority designated in accordance with Article 86m(1), to appoint an expert to examine and assess for an assessment of the draft terms of the cross- border conversion and the reports referred to in Articles 86e and 86f, subject to the proviso set out in paragraph 6 of this Article.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The application forto the appointment of an expertcompetent authority shall be accompanied by the following:
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
2. The competent authority shall appointIf it considers it necessary, the competent authority shall be free to seek the assistance of an independent expert within five working days from the application referred to in paragraph 1 and the receipt of the draft terms and reports. The expert shall be independent from the company carrying out the cross-border conversion and may be a natural or a legal person depending upon the law of the departure Member State. Member States shall take into account, in assessing the independence of the expert, the framework established in Articles 22 and 22b of Directive 2006/43/EC.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 3
3. The expertWhere there is reasonable doubt as to the real reason for a cross-border conversion, the competent authority shall draw up a written report providing at least:
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the independent expert shall becompetent authority is entitled to obtain, from the company carrying out the cross- border conversion, all relevant information and documents and to carry out all necessary investigations to verify all elements of the draft terms or management reports. The expertcompetent authority shall also be entitled to receive comments and opinions from the representatives of the employees of the company, or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves and also from the creditors and members of the company.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that information submittgathered toby the independent expertcompetent authority can only be used for the purpose of drafting theits report and that confidential information, including business secrets, shall not be disclosed. Where appropriate, the expertcompetent authority may submit a separate document containing any such confidential information to the competent authority, designated in accordance with Article 86m(1) and that separate document shall only be made available to the company carrying out the cross-border conversion and not be disclosed to any other party.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 j – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the members holding shares with voting rights and who did not vote forwho voted against the approval of the draft terms of the cross- border conversion;
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 j – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that a company carrying out a cross-border conversion makes an offer of adequate compensation in the draft terms of the cross-border conversion as specified in the Article 86d(1)(i) to the members, referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, who wish to exercise their right to dispose of their shareholdings. Member States shall also establish the period for the acceptance of the offer, which shall not in any event exceed one month after the general meeting referred to in Article 86is must express their intention to avail themselves of their exit right before the general meeting. Member States shall further ensure that a company is able to accept an offer communicated electronically to an address provided by the company for that purpose.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 j – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that any member who has accepted the offer of cash compensation referred to in paragraph 3, but who considers that the cash compensation has not been adequately set, is entitled to demand the recalculation of the cash compensation offered before a national court within one month15 days of the acceptance of the offer.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 86 k – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that creditors who are dissatisfied with the protection of their interests provided for in the draft terms of the cross-border conversion, as provided for in Article 86d(f), and who have lodged their objection before the cross-border conversion may apply to the appropriate administrative or judicial authority for adequate safeguards within one month of the disclosure referred to in Article 86h.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2018/0114(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive (EU) 2017/1132
Article 126 a – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that each of the merging companies makes an offer of adequate cash compensation in the common draft terms of the cross-border merger, as specified in Article 122(1)(m), to those members referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article who wish to exercise their right to dispose of their shareholdings. Member States shall also establish the period for the acceptance of the offer, which shall not in any event exceed one month after the general meeting referred to in Article 126The members shall express their intention of invoking their exit right before the general meeting or, in cases where the approval of the general meeting is not required, within twoone months after the disclosure of the common draft terms of merger referred to in Article 123. Member States shall further ensure that the merging companies are able to accept an offer communicated electronically to an address provided by those companies for that purpose.
2018/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authority (the ‘Authority’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authority should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations as well as access to relevant services, without prejudice to the EURES-T cross-border partnerships’ tasks of providing information, advice and support on all cross-border labour market issues, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross-border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The establishment of the Authority should not create new rights and obligations for individuals or employers, particularly SMEs, including economic operators or non-profit organisations, as the activities of the Authority should cover them to the extent to which they are covered by the Union law within the scope of this Regulation.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To ensure they can benefit from a fair and effective internal market, the Authority should promote opportunities for individuals and employers to be mobile or provide services and recruit anywhere within the Union. This includes supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals by facilitating access to cross-border mobility services, such as the cross-EURES-T cross- border partnerships that enable the cross- border matching of jobs, traineeships and apprenticeships and by promoting mobility schemes such as 'Your first EURES job' or 'ErasmusPRO’. The Authority should also contribute to improving transparency of information, including on rights and obligations stemming from Union law, and access to services to individuals and employers, in cooperation with other Union information services, such as Your Europe Advice, and taking full advantage and ensuring consistency with the Your Europe portal, which will form the backbone of the future single digital gateway53. __________________ 53 Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The Authority shall take over responsibility for the EURES portal’s technical and operational tasks. This transfer of activity must neither cause the EURES budgets to be reduced nor shall it disrupt the portal’s operations. By maintaining an ambitious budget independent of any national or regional contributions for EURES – i.e. administered directly by the European Commission – the Authority shall ensure the proper functioning of the portal and the highest quality in the information services EURES provides to individuals and employers.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authority should cooperate with other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54, the European Enterprise Network55, the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57, as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authority should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59, notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform without, however, replacing the mediation role played by the Administrative Commission for Social Security Regulations. The Authority shouldmay replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, andprovided that this neither undermines the benefits and services provided by EURES and the EURES-T cross-border partnerships nor serves as a pretext for a reduction in the budget for EURES and the EURES-T cross-border partnerships. The provision of IT services, the operation and the development of the IT infrastructure, which willill, meanwhile, continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) In view of the fair, simple and effective application of Union law, the Authority should support cooperation and timely exchange of information between Member States. Together with other staff, National Liaison Officers working within the Authority should support Member States’ compliance with cooperation obligations, speed up exchanges between them through procedures dedicated to reducing delays, and ensure links with other national liaison offices, bodies, and contact points established under Union law. The Authority should encourage the use of innovative approaches to effective and efficient cross-border cooperation, including electronic data exchange tools such as the Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information (EESSI) system and the Internal Market Information (IMI) system, once it is fully functioning and operational, and should contribute to further digitalising procedures and improving IT tools used for message exchange between national authorities.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Authority should provide a platform for resolving disputes between Member States in relation to the application of Union law that falls within its scope, without impinging on the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It should build on dialogue and conciliation mechanisms that are currently in place in the area of social security coordination, which are valued by Member States60 and their importance is recognised by the Court of Justice61. Member States should be able to refer cases to the Authority for mediation according to standard procedures put in place for this purpose. The Authority should only deal with disputes between Member States, while individuals and employers facing difficulties with exercising their Union rights should continue to have at their disposal the national and Union services dedicated to dealing with such cases, such as the SOLVIT network to which the Authority should refer such cases. The SOLVIT network should also be able to refer to the Authority for its consideration cases in which the problem cannot be solved due to differences between national administrations. __________________ 60 Council, Partial general approach of 26 October 2017 on the proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 13645/1/17. 61 Case C-236/88 EU:C:1990:303, paragraph 17; Case C-202/97 EU:C:2000:75, paragraphs 57-58; Case C- 178/97 EU:C:2000:169, paragraphs 44-45; Case C-2/05 EU:C:2006:69, paragraphs 28-29; Case C-12/14 EU:C:2016:135, paragraphs 39-41; Case C-359/16 EU:C:2018:63, paragraphs 44-45.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Member States and the Commission and the European Parliament should be represented on a Management Board, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the Authority. The composition of the Management Board, including the selection of its Chair and Deputy-Chair, should respect the principles of gender balance, experience and qualification. In view of the effective and efficient functioning of the Authority, the Management Board, in particular, should adopt an annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Authority’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Authority, appoint an Executive Director, and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Authority by the Executive Director. Representatives from countries other than Union Member States, which are applying the Union rules within the scope of the Authority, may participate in the meetings of the Management Board as observers.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The Authority should complement the activities of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems created by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (‘the Administrative Commission’) in so far as it exercises regulatory tasks related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009 without, however, replacing the Administrative Commission’s mediation duties. The Authority should however take over operational tasks currently carried out under the framework of the Administrative Commission, such as providing a mediation function between Member States, ensuring a forum for handling financial matters related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, replacing the function of the Audit Board set up by those Regulations, as well as matters related to electronic data exchange and IT tools to facilitate the application of those Regulations, replacing the function of the Technical Commission for Data Processing set up by those Regulations.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) facilitate access to information by individuals and employers on rights and obligations in cross-border situations as well as access to cross-border labour mobility services, in accordance with Articles 6 and 7and without prejudice to the EURES-T cross-border partnerships’ information, advice and support duties on all cross-border labour market issues;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
Regulation 2018/0064
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) mediate in disputes between Member States' authorities on the application of relevant Union law, in accordance with Article 13, without impinging on the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in the event of cross- border labour market disruptions, in accordance with Article 14, in close collaboration with the EURES-T cross- border partnerships.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 399 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Authority shall improve the availability, quality and accessibility of information offered to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES, particularly Article 27 thereof, on support services in cross-border regions, and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authority shall, without prejudice to the EURES-T cross-border partnerships’ information, advice and support duties on all cross-border labour market issues:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) promote opportunities to support the labour mobility of individuals, particularly support that may be provided by EURES-T cross-border partnerships, including through guidance on access to learning and language training;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 445 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
1. The Authority shall provide services to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union. To that end, the Authority shall, without prejudice to the EURES-T cross-border partnerships’ information, advice and support duties on all cross-border labour market issues:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 449 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promote the development of initiatives supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals, including the development of targeted mobility schemes or, in border regions, EURES-T cross- border partnerships;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 450 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) enable the cross-border matching of job, traineeship, and apprenticeship vacancies with CVs and applications for the benefit of individuals and employers, particularly via EURES and in close collaboration, in border regions, with the EURES-T cross-border partnerships which advise and inform workers and employers on cross-border mobility opportunities;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 457 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
Regulation 2018/0064
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) facilitate cooperation between competent services at the national level designated in accordance with Directive 2014/54/EU to provide information, guidance and assistance to individuals and employers on cross-border mobility, and the national contact points designated in accordance with Directive 2011/24/EU to provide information on healthcare, without impinging on the mediation role and powers of the Administrative Commission for Social Security Regulations.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 520 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The Authority shall promote the use of electronic tools and procedures for message exchange between national authorities, including the Internal Market Information (IMI) system, once it is fully functioning and operational, and the Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information (EESSI) system.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 525 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Regulation 2018/0064
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Authority shall encourage the use of innovative approaches to effective and efficient cross-border cooperation, – the establishment of the Platform Tackling Undeclared Work being a good example of such cooperation – and explore the potential use of electronic exchange mechanisms between the Member States to facilitate the detection of fraud, providing reports to the Commission with a view to their further development.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 564 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Where the authority of a Member State decides not to participate in or carry out the concerted or joint inspection referred to paragraph 1, it shall inform the Authority in writing of the reasons for its decision duly in advancwithin a reasonable deadline. In such cases, the Authority shall inform the other national authorities concerned.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 663 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall assess risks and carry out analyses regarding cross-border labour flows, such as labour market imbalances, sector-specific threats and recurring problems encountered by individuals and employers in relation to cross-border mobility. For that purpose, the Authority shall ensure complementarity with, and draw on the expertise of, other Union agencies or services, including in the areas of skills forecasting and health and safety at work. Upon a request by the European Commission or the competent committee of the European Parliament, the Authority may carry out focused in- depth analyses and studies to investigate specific labour mobility issues.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 711 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Regulation 2018/0064
Article 13 paragraph 1
1. In the event of disputes between Member States regarding the application or interpretation of Union law in areas covered by this Regulation, the Authority may perform a mediation role, without impinging on the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 738 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
Regulation 2018/0064
Article 13 paragraph 4
4. Cases in which there are ongoing court proceedings or preliminary investigations at national or Union level shall not be admissible for mediation by the Authority.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 793 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Authority may set up working groups or expert panels with representatives from Member States and/or from the European Commission and the European Parliament, or external experts following selection procedures, for the fulfilment of its specific tasks or for specific policy areas, including a Mediation Board in order to fulfil its tasks in accordance with Article 13 of this Regulation, and a dedicated group for the purpose of handling financial matters related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, as referred to in Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 806 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The Management Board shall be composed of one senior representative from each Member State and two representatives of the European Commission, all of whom have voting rights, as well as independent experts appointed by the European Parliament to represent it.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 815 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The European Commission and the competent committee of the European Parliament shall appoint the members who are to represent ithem.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 828 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. RThe other decentralised Union agencies or representatives from third countries, which are applying the Union law in areas covered by this Regulation, may participate in the meetings of the Management Board as observers.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 859 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Executive Director shall manage the Authority’s day-to-day operations. The Executive Director shall be accountable to the Management Board.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 864 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new)
(ja) to ensure compliance with the European Employment Services’ (EURES) budget;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 895 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Stakeholder Group shall be composed of six representatives of Union- level social partners equally representing trade unions and employer’s organisations (including a representative of SMEs), and two representatives of the European Commission and an independent expert appointed by the European Parliament to represent it.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 925 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The translation services required for the functioning of the Authoritgency shall be provided by the Translation Centre of the Bbodies of the European Union or, where necessary, by other services.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 972 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2016/589
Article 1 – point a
(a) the organisation of the EURES network between the Commission, the European Labour Authority and, the Member States and the EURES-T cross-border partnerships;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the employment rate in the EU has been growing for four consecutive years and now surpasses the 2008 figure, but still remains below the pre-crisis level in half of the Member States; whereas regional disparities have started to narrow but remain high in some Member States;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas while the risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU has fallen back to its pre-crisis level, it remains very high including in more developed regions and far from reaching the Europe 2020 poverty and social exclusion target;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas infra-regional disparities are growing, including in more prosperous regions which contain pockets of poverty; whereas most prosperous regions allow driving effects in favor of growth;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Is of the opinion that Cohesion Policy, as the main investment policy of the Union, should be maintained at at least a similar budgetary level in the future multiannual financial framework; considers that the European Social Fund (ESF) should be retained as the main EU instrument for the integration and reintegration of workers into the labour market as well as for supporting measures for social inclusion, combating poverty and inequalities; defends the consideration of social criteria for the allocation of funds, in particular the unemployment rate and the youth unemployment rate, in addition to GDP per capita;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that the principle of proportionality must prevail in the management and control of cohesion programs; calls on the Commission and the Member States to explore the possibilities of an online system of application more conducive to administrative simplification for project managers;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2017/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Underlines that social and fiscal convergence contribute to the cohesion objective and that divergent practices in this area are liable to cause further problems for territories most vulnerable to globalisation;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that while women make up a clear majority of journalism and media graduates in the EU, they are still significantly under-represented at the decision-making level, for example on boards of directors; notes that this under- representation is a major contributing factorcontributes to the negative and stereotypical portrayal of women in the media in the EU;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that women working in the media will benefit from the general advancement of conditions for women in the workplace, including end; considers, however, that this improvement is not sufficient and that inequalities remain; stresses the need to promote the principle of equal pay, including by combating the gender pay gap, reducing precarious work, ensuring affordable and accessiincreasing the accessibility of affordable childcare and boostensuring collective bargaining rights;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that achieving equality for women at all levels, and particularly decision-making levels, in the media requires transparency in pay systems, gender-neutral classification, effective measures to end sexual harassmentpro-active andeffective measures to end sexual harassment, the full implementation in the Member States of the European directives, reversing the onus of proof in challenging gender discrimination in the workplace, and desegregation of the workforce;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Insists that it is important to ensure that women enjoy a work-life balance, especially in view of the irregular working hours in the media sector, for example;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the adoption ofand implementation of the directive on women on boards of directors, which sets up a quota system in both public and private media organisations in order to ensure women’s equal representation at the decision-making level; calls for Member State governments to link the award of public contracts in the media to obligatory gender-equality measures; notes the positive role of women’s councils and women’s equality officers in workplaces;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2017/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the Commission and Member States to provide financial support tosupport and promote women’s organisations which are active in the sphere of promoting gender equality in the media;
2017/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reiterates the call for the three new headline employment indicators to be placed on an equal footing with existing economic indicators, thereby guaranteeing that internal imbalances are better assessed and making structural reforms more effective;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Proposes introducing a non- punitive social imbalances procedure in the design of the CSRs so as to prevent a race to the bottom in terms of social standards, building on effective use of the social and employment indicators in macroeconomic surveillance;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas skills, digital literacy included, have a strategic importance for growth, innovation and social cohesion and the complexity of jobs is increasing across all sectors and occupations and there is inflation in relative skills demand, even for low-skilled jobs;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 90 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas entrepreneurship skills need to be understood in a broader sense, as a sense of initiative, participation in social actions and an entrepreneurial mind- set, and should therefore be further emphasised in the Skills Agenda as a life skill which, for instance by encouraging Member States to foster the entrepreneurial spirit in young people from the earliest age, through placements and visits to companies, bearing in mind that the life skills in question benefits individuals in their personal and professional life;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 117 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the focus on the need to upgrade the European education and training systems in line with the fast changing economic and societal environment; notes that, while skills needs are dynamic, the main focus of the skills package is the immediate needs of the labour market; highlights in this respect the importance of a pan-European skills needs foreworking in close collaboration with the European Centre for the Development of Vocasting tool andonal Training, Cedefop, in order to anticipate skills needs and improve lifelong learning systems with a view to adapting to new situations in the labour market;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 159 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls, in this respect, the need for enhanced cooperation among the Member States to learn from best practices which lead to lower unemployment rates, like alternance training19 and lifelong learning; points out there is a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Cedefop, one of whose main tasks is to bring together political leaders, social partners, researchers, and practitioners for the purpose of exchanging ideas and experience; _________________ 19 Educational training combining periods in any educational institution or training centre and in the work place. The alternance scheme can take place on a weekly, monthly or yearly basis. Depending on the country and the applicable status, participants may be contractually linked to the employer and/or receive remuneration. According to the CEDEFOP terminology, the German dual system is an example of alternance training. (Terminology of European education and training policy, CEDEFOP)
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 217 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that skills development must be a shared responsibility between education providers and employers; insists that the industry/employers should be involved in providing and training people with the necessary skills, throughout their careers, in order for businesses to be competitive and at the same time boost people’s self-confidence;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 229 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Asks for concrete measures to be put in place in order to facilitate the transition of young people from education to work by ensuring quality internships and apprenticeships as well as cross-border exchange programmes such as Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs, giving young people the possibility of putting their talents into practice and haveing a set of rights and access to social protection; calls on Member States to provide special support to SMEs so that they too are able to take on interns and work-study (alternance) trainees;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 255 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Regrets thatCalls on the Commission and Member States to encourage employers and formal education providers do not sufficientlyto recognise the value and relevance of skills, competences and knowledge acquired through non-formal and informal learning;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 267 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that non-formal learning, including volunteering, has a crucial role to play in stimulating the development of life skills such as team work, creativity and a sense of initiative while reinforcing self- esteem and motivation to learn; emphasises in this respect the decisive role of a number of young entrepreneurs' organisations that offer young people the chance to gain entrepreneurial experience and hence to develop an entrepreneurial spirit and acquire the confidence needed to be enterprising;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 329 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses the need to include elements of entrepreneurial learning, including internships and traineeships, at all levels of education, since instilling entrepreneurial spirit among the young at an early stage is an effective way of combating youth unemployment and developing entrepreneurship among young people;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 385 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses the need to increase the attractiveness of VET and make apprenticeships a priority by making sure that young people and their families have access to information on VET options by creating more bridges between VET and traditional education and by making VET a true path of excellence, provided from a very early age and at all levels of education;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 452 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission in addition to develop a pan-European skill needs foreto work closely with the European Centre for the Development of Vocasting tool, which would make it possible to estimonal Training, Cedefop, in order to better estimate and anticipate future skill needs and adapt them better to the jobs available on the labour market;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 492 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39 a. Welcomes the planned revision of the European Qualifications Framework, which should help improve the readability of existing skills and qualifications in the various countries of the European Union; stresses that such a tool is essential for the development of professional mobility, particularly in border areas;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 86 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Since the adoption of Council Directive 91/533/EEC33, labour markets have undergone far-reaching changes due to demographic developments and digitalisation leading to the creation of new forms of employment, which have supported innovation, job creation and labour market growth. New forms of employment are often not as regular or stable ascan vary greatly in their predictability from traditional employment relationships and can sometimes lead to reduced predictability for the workers concerned, creating uncertainty as toover applicable rights and social protection. In this evolving world of work, there is therefore an increased need for workers to be fully informed about their essential working conditions, which should occur in a written form and in a timely manntimely manner and in a written form and in a form easily accessible to workers. In order adequately to frame the development of new forms of employment, workers in the Union should also be provided with a number of new minimum rights aimed at promoting security and predictability in employment relationships while achieving upward convergence across Member States and preserving labour market adaptability. __________________ 33 Council Directive 91/533/EC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The Commission has undertaken a two-phase consultation with the social partners on the improvement of the scope and effectiveness of Directive 91/533/EEC and the broadening of its objectives in order to insertestablish new rights for workers, in accordance with Article 154 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). This did not result in any agreement among social partners to enter into negotiations on those matters. However, as confirmed byon the basis of the outcome of the open public consultations carried out to seek the views of various stakeholders and citizens, it is importantessential to take action at the Union level in this area by modernising and adapting the current legal framework to new developments.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The criteria for the definition of ‘worker’ as established by the Court of Justice of the EU34a should apply, without prejudice to national provisions and collective agreements already in force. __________________ 34a Judgment of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the increasing number of workers excluded from the scope of Directive 91/533/EEC on the basis of derogations made by Member States under Article 1 of that Directive, it is necessary to replace these derogations with a possibility for Member States not to apply the provisions of the Directive to a work relationship equal to or less than 820 hours in total in a reference period of one month or 5 hours during a one-week reference period. That derogation does not affect the definition of a worker as provided for in Article 2(1).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Workers who are self-employed do not fall within the scope of this Directive because they do not have a relationship of subordination to an employer and therefore do not meet the criteria established by the Court of Justice of the European Union for the definition of ‘worker’1a. __________________ 1a Judgment of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) For seasonal workers in the agricultural sector, the information provided by the employer should indicate the possibility of replacing the taking of paid leave with a payment, in order to respond to the work patterns and specific constraints of that sector.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) If, due to the nature of the employment, it is not possible to indicate a fixed work schedule due to the nature of the employment, workers should knowsetting the times and dates at or on which work begins and ends or if workers have on-demand contracts or are in a similar employment relationship, employers should inform workers how their work schedule will be established, including the time slots in which they may be called to workon-call times and the minimum advance notice they should receive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) If it is not possible to indicate a fixed work schedule due to the nature of the employment, workers should know how their work schedule will be established, including the time slots in which they may be called to work and the minimum advance notice they should receiveparticularly for seasonal workers in the agricultural sector, workers should be kept informed, in so far as possible, as to how their work schedule will be established.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) It is essential that the employer should provide information on the social security bodies receiving social security contributions related to the employment relationship in order to prevent cases of fraud and circumvention of legislation. Information on social security systems should include, where relevant, sickness, maternity and equivalent, parental, paternity, old-age, invalidity, survivors', unemployment, pre-retirement or family benefits. Information on social security protection provided by the employer should include, where relevant, coverage by supplementary pension schemes within the meaning of Council Directive 98/49/EC36 and Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council37. __________________ 36 Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self- employed persons moving within the Community (OJ L 209, 25.7.1998, p. 46). 37 Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 1).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Workers should have the right to be informed about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship in writing at the start of employment. The relevantessential information should therefore reach them at the latest on the first day of the employmentreferred to in Article 3(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (j), (k) and (l) should reach them at the latest seven days after they start their job. The other information referred to in Article 3(2) may be communicated to them within 30 days of starting their job.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Probationary periods allow employers to verify that workers are suitable for the position for which they have been engaged while providing them with accompanying support and training. Such periods may be accompanied by reduced protection against dismissal. Any entry into the labour market or transition to a new position should not be subject to prolonged insecurity. As established in the European Pillar of Social Rights, probationary periods should therefore be of reasonable duration. A substantial number of Member States have established a general maximum duration of probation between three and six months, which should be considered reasonable. Probationary periods may be longer than six months where this is justified by the nature of the employment such as for managerial positions or jobs in the public sector in order to comply with the employment conditions or legislative and regulatory provisions that apply to them and where this is in the interest of the worker, such as in the case of long illness or in the context of specific measures promoting permanent employment notably for young workers.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Employers should not prohibit workers from taking up employment with other employers, outside the time spent working for them, within the limits set out in Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council39. IMember States should be able to introduce incompatibility clauses, understood as a restriction on working for specific categories of employers, may bif they are necessary for objective reasons, such as the protection of business secrets or, the avoidance of conflicts of interests or health and safety at work. __________________ 39 Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) On account of particular characteristics of the sector, the provisions of this Directive concerning the predictability of work should not apply to seamen and fishermen.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Where employers have the possibility to offer full-time or open-ended labour contracts to workers in non-standard forms of employment, a transition to more secure forms of employment should be promoted in accordance with the principles established in the European Pillar of Social Rights. Workers should be able to request another more predictable and secure form of employment, where available, and receive a written response from the employer, which takes into account the needs of the employer and of the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Where employers have the possibility to offer full-time or open-ended labour contracts to workers in non-standard forms of employment, a transition to more secure forms of employment should be promoted. Workers should be able to request another more predictable and secure form of employment, where available, and receive, a writtens soon as possible, at least a verbal response from the employer, which takes into account the needs of the employer and of the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) It is necessary for the social partners to be involved, to ensure the proper implementation of this Directive, because they have an important role to play in reconciling the interests and needs of employers and workers.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Social partners may consider that in specific sectors or situations different provisions can be adapted, completed or improved if they are more appropriate, for the pursuit of the purpose of this Directive, than the minimum standards set inin accordance with Chapter Three of this Directive. Member States should therefore be able to allowencourage the social partners to conclude collective agreements modifapplying the provisions contained inof that cChapter, as long asprovided that the overall level of protection of workers is not loweredcontinues to be respected and that the minimum requirements laid down in this Directive are met.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) National labour inspectorates should monitor compliance with this Directive in each Member State. At European level, they should cooperate as closely as possible with each other and exchange best practices. The future European Labour Authority could play a prime role in this process.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) The Member States mayshould entrust social partners with the implementation of this Directive, where social partners jointly request to do so and as long as the Member States take all the necessary steps to ensure that they can at all times guarantee the results sought under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations in this Directive to workers who have an employment relationship equal to or less than 820 hours in total in a reference period of one month or 5 hours in a reference period of one week. Time worked with all employers forming or belonging to the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that 85 or 20 hour period.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Member States may decide, on objective grounds, that the minimum requirements as regards working conditions laid down in Chapter III of this Directive should not apply to public sector workers, the armed forces and the law enforcement agencies.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 7
7. Chapter II of this Directive applies to seafarers and fishermen without prejudice to Council Directive 2009/13/EC and Council Directive (EU) 2017/159, respectively. Point 1(2) of Article 3 and Article 9 (Chapter III) shall not apply to seafarers and fishermen.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services for and under the direction and authority of another person in return for remuneration; this definition shall apply without prejudice to national provisions and collective agreements in force;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 412 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that employers are required to inform workers of the essential aspects of the employment relationship as referred to in Article 3(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (j), (k) and (l) within seven days of them starting work.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 417 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The essential information referred to in paragraph 1, to be provided within seven days of a worker starting work, and other information, which may be provided within one month of a worker starting work, shall include:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 433 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) in the case of a temporary employment relationship, the end date or the expected duration thereof, where that is possible;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 436 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) any mandatory training entitlement provided by the employer, in the light of the national laws or collective agreements applicable;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 464 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point k
(k) if the work schedule is entirely or mostly not varipredictable, the length of the worker's standard working day or week and any arrangements for overtime and its remuneration;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 466 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – introductory part
(l) if the work schedule is entirely or mostly variaunpredictable, where that is possible, the principle that the work schedule is variunpredictable, the amount of guaranteed paid hours, the remuneration of work performed in addition to the guaranteed hours and, if the work schedule is entirely or mostly determined by the employer, where that is possible:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 483 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l a (new)
(la) in the case of seasonal workers in the farming industry whose work schedules are highly variable owing to weather and environmental constraints, the information that their employment is by nature variable and that it will be difficult for the employer to predict in advance what hours and days they will work.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 510 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The information referred to in Article 3(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (j), (k) and (l) shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document at the latest on the first dayseven days after the start of the employment relationship. That document may be provided and transmitted electronically as long as it is easily accessible by the worker and can be stored and printed. The other information referred to in Article 3(2) should be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document within one month of the start of the employment relationship.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 532 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. All documents shall be provided personally, on paper or in electronic form, provided that they are easily accessible, receipt is acknowledged, and they can be stored and printed.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 548 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the information on the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing the legal framework applicable which are to be communicated by employers is made generally available free of charge in a clear, transparent, comprehensive and easily accessible way at a distance and by electronic means, including through existing online portals for Union citizens and businesse. Universally applicable collective agreements are of public interest and shall be made generally available free of charge through existing online portals.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 622 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may provide for longer probationary periods in cases where this is justified by the nature of the employment, such as in managerial positions, or is in the interest of the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 645 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Employers may however lay down conditions of incompatibility where such restrictions are justified by legitimate reasons such as the protection of business secrets or, the avoidance of conflicts of interests or health and safety in the workplace.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 717 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that workers with at least six months' seniority with the same employer may request a form of employment withtransition towards another, more predictable and secure wforking conditionsm of employment, where available.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 719 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The employer shall provide a written reply within one month of the application. With respect to natural persons acting as employers and micro, particularly if the company is an SME, smhall, or medium enterprises, Member States may provide for that deadline to be extended to no more than three months and allow an oral reply to be given to a subsequent similar request submitted by the same worker if the justification for the reply as regards the situation of the worker remains unchanged provide at least an oral reply as soon as possible after the application.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 772 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that provisions contrary to this Directive in individual or collective agreements, internal rules of undertakings, or any other arrangements shall be declared null and void or are amended in order to bring them into line with the provisions of this Directive.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 810 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States may provide that workers shall give prior notification to the employer of their decision to access the above systems. If the worker does not receive a response from the employer within a reasonable time, he or she may then trigger one of these two systems.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 862 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – title
MNon-regression clause and more favourable provisions
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 863 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States. This Directive shall not be applied and interpreted in such a way as to undermine, restrict or prejudice more favourable working conditions already negotiated in collective agreements and rights and procedural safeguards providing for a higher level of protection.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 872 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that the social partners are involved in the overall implementation of this Directive and provide them with the necessary means for such involvement to be effective.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 883 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
The rights and obligations set out in this Directive shall apply to existing employment relationships as from [entry into force date + 2 years]. However, employers shall provide or complement the documents referred to in Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 6 only upon request of a worker or the social partners. The absence of such request shall not have the effect of excluding workers from the minimum rights established under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 888 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
By [entry into force date + 2two years], the Commission shall, in consultation with the Member States and social partners at Union level and taking into account the impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, review the application of this Directive with a view to proposing, where appropriate, the necessary amendments and improvements.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) So far, and unless otherwise provided for in national law, the rules on access to the occupation of road transport operator do not apply to undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles not exceeding that limit. The number of such undertakings which are active in both national and international transport operations has been increasing. As a result, several Member States have decided to apply the rules on access to the occupation of road transport operator, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, to those undertakings. To ensure a minimum level of professionalisation of the sector using vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes by way of common rules, and thus to approximate competitive conditionsensure fair and equal competition between all operators in the sector, this provision should be deleted, whereas the requirements regarding effective and stable establishment and appropriate financial standing should be rendered mandatory for all vehicles used in international haulage and cabotage operations, of whatever size.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) It is necessary to ensure that road transport operators established in a Member State have a real and continuous presence in that Member State and conduct their business from there. Therefore, and in light of experience, it is necessary to clarify the provisions regarding the existence of an effective and stable establishmentand strengthen the provisions set out in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 regarding the existence of an effective and stable establishment in order to combat the establishment of so- called letterbox companies.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) So far, and unless otherwise provided for in national law, the rules on access to the occupation of road transport operator do not apply to undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles not exceeding that limit. The number of such undertakings which are active in both national and international transport operations has been increasing. As a result, several Member States have decided to apply the rules on access to the occupation of road transport operator,provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009,to those undertakings. To ensure a minimum level of professionalisation of the sector using vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes by way of common rules, and thus to approximate competitive conditionsensure fair and equal competition between all operators in the sector, this provision should be deleted, whereas the requirements regarding effective and stable establishment and appropriate financial standing should be rendered mandatory for all vehicles used in international haulage and cabotage operations, of whatever size.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 56 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In view of their potential to considerably affect the conditions for fair competition in the road haulage market, serious infringements of national tax rules should be added to the items relevant to the assessment of good repute and should also be subject to deterrent sanctions in proportion to the infringement identified.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) It is necessary to ensure that road transport operators established in a Member State have a real and continuous presence in that Member State and conduct their business from there. Therefore, and in light of experience, it is necessary to clarify the provisions regarding the existence of an effective and stable establishmentand strengthen the provisions set out in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 regarding the existence of an effective and stable establishment in order to combat the establishment of so- called letterbox companies.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 68 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Moreover, in order to ensure the effectiveness of a link between the country of establishment and transport operations, a minimum number of operations must be carried out by the fleet of vehicles used in the Member State where the transport undertaking is established. In addition, the undertaking must have a minimum turnover in the country where it is established.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 70 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or with combinations of vehicles not exceeding that limit should have a minimum level of financial standing, to ensure that they have the means to carry out operations on a stable and long-lasting basis. However, sinceThe rules applicable to access to the operccupations concerned are generally of a limited size, the corresponding requirements should be less demanding than those applicable to operators using vehicles or combinations of vehicles above that limit of road haulage operator by means of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes are those set out in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In view of their potential to considerably affect the conditions for fair competition in the road haulage market, serious infringements of national tax rules should be added to the items relevant to the assessment of good repute and should also be subject to deterrent sanctions in proportion to the infringement identified.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 76 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The rules on national transport performed on a temporary basis by non- resident hauliers in a host Member State ('cabotage') should be clear, simple and easy to enforce, whil– in order to avoid their having to return empty – should be clear, simple for hauliers to implement and easy to enforce in order to guarantee broadly maintaining the level of liberalisation achieved so far transport workers’ rights and promote fair competition between companies without undermining the basic principle of the free movement of services in the internal market.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To this end, and in order to facilitate checks and to eliminate uncertainty and the danger of systematic cabotage, the limitation on the number of cabotage operations subsequent to an international carriage should be abolished, whilemaintained and the number of days available for such operations should be reduced. It should be possible to determine whether cabotage is possible in three days with a single operation, which would be enough to ensure vehicles in an international operation would not have to return empty.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or with combinations of vehicles not exceeding that limit should have a minimum level of financial standing, to ensure that they have the means to carry out operations on a stable and long-lasting basis. However, since the operations concerned are generally of a limited size, the corresponding requirements should be less demanding than those applicable to operators using vehicles or combinations of vehicles above that limitThe rules applicable to access to the occupation of road haulage operator using vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes are those set out in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 105 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The rules on national transport performed on a temporary basis by non- resident hauliers in a host Member State ('cabotage') should be clear, simple and easy to enforce, whil– in order to avoid their having to return empty – should be clear, simple for hauliers to implement and easy to enforce in order to guarantee broadly maintaining the level of liberalisation achieved so far transport workers’ rights and promote fair competition between companies without undermining the basic principle of the free movement of services in the internal market.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 117 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 3(1)(b) and (d) and Articles 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 19 and 21 shall notalso apply to undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To this end, and in order to facilitate checks and to eliminate uncertainty and the risk of systematic cabotage, the limitation on the number of cabotage operations subsequent to an international carriage should be abolished, whilemaintained and the number of days available for such operations should be reduced. The time limit for cabotage should be set at three days with a single operation, which would be enough to ensure vehicles in an international operation would not have to return empty.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 131 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The means by which road transport operators can prove compliance with the rules for cabotage operations should be clarified. The use and transmission of electronic transport information should be recognised as such means,o ensure fair competition in each internal market, the application of EU rules to electronic transport information, the use and transmission of which should simplify the provision of relevant evidence and its treatment by the competent authorities, should be subject to effective control. The format used for that purpose should ensure reliability and authenticity. Considering the increasing use of efficient electronic exchange of information in transport and logistics, it is important to ensure coherence in the regulatory frameworks and provisions addressing the simplification of administrative procedures. To do that, it is desirable to continue the process of making transport documents paperless in order to simplify controls and administrative and procedures. Thus, in the spirit of the Additional Protocol of 20 February 2008 to the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR), the use of electronic documents should eventually become the rule, particularly the electronic consignment note.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 167 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 3(1)(b) and (d) and Articles 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 19 and 21 shall notalso apply to undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 168 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Member States may, however: (a) require those undertakings to apply some or all of the provisions referred to in the first subparagraph; (b) lower the limit referred to in the first subparagraph for all or some categories of road transport operations.;deleted
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 184 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 5 – point a
(a) have premises in which it keeps its core business documentsappropriate premises, proportionate to the activities of the undertaking in the member State of establishment, in which it keeps its core business documents, accessible either in hard copy or electronic form, in particular its commercial contracts, accounting documents, personnel management documents, labour contracts, documents containing data relating to driving time and rest and any other document to which the competent authority must have access in order to verify compliance with the conditions laid down in this Regulation;;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 197 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 18 – point 3 a
3a. In order to facilitate cooperation between administrations and the exchange of best monitoring practice, the Member States shall work together with the platform for combating undeclared work and the European Labour Authority
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 5 – point d
(d) manage the transport operations carried out with the vehicles referred to in point (b) and the servicing of this fleet of vehicles with the appropriate technical equipment situated in that Member State;;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 210 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point c
(1a) In Article 1(5), point (c) is deleted.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 2–paragraph 6
6. ‘cabotage operation’ means national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State, involving the carriage from the picking up of the goods at one or several loading points until their delivery at one or several delivery points, as specified in the consignment note;', with the main aim of ensuring that lorries do not travel empty;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 5 – point d a (new)
(da) organises its activities in such a way that each vehicle used in international transport operations performs, at least once every two weeks, one commercial loading or unloading of goods operation in the country of establishment of the undertaking concerned.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 217 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In determining whether an undertaking, irrespective of the type of vehicle it uses in its transport operations, has satisfied that requirement, Member States shall consider the conduct of the undertaking, its transport managers, executive directors, general partners in the case of partnerships, other legal representatives and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State. Any reference in this Article to convictions, penalties or infringements shall include convictions, penalties or infringements of the undertaking itself, its transport managers, executive directors, general partners in the case of partnerships, other legal representatives and any other relevant person as may be determined by the Member State.;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 226 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to a host Member State have been delivered, hauliers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be allowed to carry out, with the same vehicle or, in the case of a coupled combination, the motor vehicle of that same vehicle, cabotage operations in the host Member State or in contiguous Member Statesin order to avoid returning empty. The last unloading in the course of athe single authorised cabotage operation shall take place within 53 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage.';
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii (new)
Règlement (CE) 1071/2009
Article 6 – paragraphe 1 – point b – sous point xiii (nouveau)
(xiia) cabotage
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 263 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(6a) Vehicles used for purposes of cabotage must carry all the consignment notes corresponding to each operation, in paper or electronic form. In the event of an inspection, the driver must be able to immediately produce, for the officer of the host Member State carrying it out, the consignment notes covering all the work he has performed in the 60 days before the date of the inspection.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 312 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 12 (new)
Directive (CE) 1071/2009
Article 18 – point 3 nouveau
3a. In order to facilitate cooperation between administrations and the exchange of best monitoring practices, the Member States shall work together with the undeclared work platform and the European Labour Authority.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 329 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 23 – paragraph 2 (new)
(12a) Undertakings which only operate road vehicles with a permissible laden mass that does not exceed 3.5 tonnes must comply with this Regulation from the entry into force of this amendment.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 351 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point c
(1a) (1a) In Article 1(5), point (c) is deleted.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 354 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 6
6. ‘cabotage operation’ means national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State, involving the carriage from the picking up of the goods at one or several loading points until their delivery at one or several delivery points, as specified in the consignment note, with the main aim of ensuring that lorries do not travel unladen;’;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 389 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to a host Member State have been delivered, hauliers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be allowed to carry out, with the same vehicle or, in the case of a coupled combination, the motor vehicle of that same vehicle, cabotage operations in the host Member State or in contiguous Member Statesin order to avoid returning empty. The last unloading in the course of athe single cabotage operation shall take place within 53 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage.';
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 19 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Having evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the existing set of Union social rules in road transport, and in particular Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 , certain deficiencies were identified in the existing legal framework. Unclear and unsuitable rules on weekly rest, resting facilities, breaks in multi- manning and the absence of rules on the return of drivers to their home, lead to diverging interpretations and enforcement practices in the Member States. Several Member States recently adopted unilateral measures further increasing legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators. __________________ 9 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1).
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Drivers engaged in long-distance international transport operations spend long periods away from their home. The current requirements on the regular weekly rest unnecessarily prolong those periods. It is thus desirable to adapt the provision on the regular weekly rest in such a way that it is easier for drivers to carry out transport operations in compliance with the rules and to reacho ensure that these periods away from home are not excessively long, operators should organise the work of drivers in such a way that they can live in decent conditions thanks to allowances or bonuses sufficient to fund decent accommodation. Measures should also be taken to ensure that operators organise the return of drivers to their home for a regular weekly rest, and be fully compensated for all reduced weekly rest periods. It is also necessary to provide that operators organise the work of drivers in such a way that these periods away from home are not excessively longnother place of their choosing at least every two weeks. It is essential that the duration of this return trip does not count as part of the rest period and that if drivers choose to spend their rest time in a place other than their home the undertaking must not in any way use it to save on the cost of a return or of travel allowances for the driver.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To simplify and enhance cost- effectiveness of enforcement of the social rules the potential of the current and future tachograph system, all international goods transport vehicles should be fully exploitted. Therefore the functionalities of the tachograph should be improved to with smart tachographs by 2023, which will allow for more precise positioning, in particular during international transport operations.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Having evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the existing set of Union social rules in road transport, and in particular Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council9, certain deficiencies were identified in the existing legal framework. Unclear and unsuitable rules on weekly rest, resting facilities, breaks in multi- manning and the absence of rules on the return of drivers to their home, lead to diverging interpretations and enforcement practices in the Member States. Several Member States recently adopted unilateral measures further increasing legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators. _________________ 9 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1).
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 59 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The exclusion of road vehicles or combinations of vehicles carrying out international transport operations with a laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes has resulted in the development of unfair competition and differences in the application of Regulation (EC) 561/2006, leading to disparities in working conditions and compromising road safety. These types of vehicles should therefore also be included in the scope of Regulation (EC) 561/2006.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The maximum driving periods per day, per week and per period of two consecutive weeks, as set out in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, clearly contribute to improving the social conditions of road drivers and road safety in general. They should therefore remain in force and steps should be taken to ensure that they are respected.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 69 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) In order to ensure, at European level, the conditions for road safety, environmental protection and fair and healthy competition, this Regulation applies to all motorised vehicles carrying out international transport and/or cabotage operations.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 77 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) of goods where the maximum permissible mass of the vehicle, including any trailer, or semi-trailer, exceeds 3,5 tonne-1) In Article 2, paragraph 1(a) is replaced by the following: (a) of goods, or
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Drivers engaged in long-distance international transport operations spend long periods away from their home. The current requirements on the regular weekly rest unnecessarily prolong those periods. It In order to ensure that these periods away from home are not excessively long, provision should be made for carriers to organise thus desirable to adapt the provision on the regular weekly rest in such a way that it is easier for drivers to carry out transport operations in compliance with the rules and to reache work of these drivers so that they can live in decent conditions through the provision of adequate compensation or premiums to pay for decent accommodation. Measures should also be taken to ensure that operators organise the return of drivers to their home for a regular weekly rest, and be fully compensated for all reduced weekly rest periods. It is also necessary to provide that operators organise the work of drivers in such a way that these periods away from home are not excessively longnother place of their choosing at least every two weeks. It is essential that the duration of this return trip does not count as part of the rest period and that if drivers choose to spend their rest time in a place other than their home the undertaking must not in any way use it to save on the cost of a return or of travel allowances for the driver.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 104 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
(a) in paragraph 6, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “6. driver shall take at least: (a) or (b) at least 45 hours and two reduced weekly rest periods of at least 24 hours. For the purposes of point (b), the reduced weekly rest periods shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken en bloc before the end of the third week following the week in question.deleted In any four consecutive weeks a four regular weekly rest periods, two regular weekly rest periods of
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
8a. The regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall notcannot under any circumstances be taken in a vehicle. They shallIt must be taken in a suitable accommodation, withoutside the cabin, having a secure parking area and adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities;.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To simplify and enhance cost- effectiveness of enforcement of the social rules the potential of the current and future tachograph systems should be fully exploited. Therefore the functionalities of the tachograph should be improved to allow for more precise positioning, in particular during international transport operation, all vehicles carrying out international road haulage and cabotage operations should be fitted with smart tachographs by 2023, in order to allow for more precise positioning of these vehicles.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 138 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The exclusion of light goods vehicles or combinations of vehicles carrying out international transport operations with goods not exceeding 3.5 tonnes has resulted in the development of unfair competition between the enterprises of Member States and differences in the application of Regulation (EC) 561/2006, leading to disparities in the working conditions of drivers and compromising road safety. These types of vehicles should therefore also be included in the scope of Regulation (EC) 561/2006.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 147 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 b
8b. A transport undertaking shall organise the work of drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to spend at least one regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for reduced weekly rest at home within each period of threewo consecutive weeks.;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
First Article – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(1a) of goods where the maximum permissible mass of the vehicle, including any trailer, or semi-trailer, exceeds 3.5 tonnes, or content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006R0561&qid=1519652857817&from=FR)in Article 2, paragraph 1, point (a), is replaced by the following: "(a) of goods, or” Or. fr (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 174 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. 15 years after newly registered vehicles are required to have a tachograph as provided in Articles 8, 9 and 10, vehicles(-1) In Article 3, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: "4. Vehicles performing road transport operatingons in a Member State other than their Member State of registration shall be fitted with a smart tachograph within four years of the introduction of the requirement to have such a tachograph.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
(a) in paragraph 6, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: 6. In any four consecutive weeks a driver shall take at least: a) four regular weekly rest periods, or b) two regular weekly rest periods of at least 45 hours and two reduced weekly rest periods of at least 24 hours. For the purposes of point (b), the reduced weekly rest periods shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken en bloc before the end of the third week following the week in question.deleted
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 326 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a
8a. The regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall not cannot under any circumstances be taken in a vehicle. They shallIt must be taken in a suitable accommodation, withoutside the cabin, with a secure parking area and adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities,.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 365 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 b
8b. A transport undertaking shall organise the work of drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to spend at least one regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for reduced weekly rest at home within each period of threewo consecutive weeks.";
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 440 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
4. 15 years after newly registered vehicles ar-1 In Article 3 of the prequired to have a tachograph as provided in Articles 8, 9 and 10, vehiclessent Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: '4. Vehicles performing international road transport operatingons in a Member State other than their Member State of registration shallould be fitted with such aa smart tachograph. within four years of the introduction of the requirement.' Or. fr (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014R0165&from=EN)
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 477 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 165/2014
Article 34 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
7. The driver shall enter in the digital tachograph the symbols of the countries in which the daily working period started and finished as well as where and when the driver has crossed a border in the vehicle on arrival at the suitable stopping place. The driver shall also enter the symbols of the countries that he has entered after crossing the border, starting at the first possible stopping point in the Member State. This stopping point should be understood as the first available place where the driver can stop the vehicle safely and within 15 minutes of crossing the border. Member States may require drivers of vehicles engaged in transport operations inside their territory to add more detailed geographic specifications to the country symbol, provided that those Member States have notified those detailed geographic specifications to the Commission before 1 April 1998.”.
2018/02/27
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 36 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The balance between enhancing social and working conditions for drivers and, facilitating the exercise of the freedom to provide road transport services based onand ensuring fair competition between national and foreign operators is crucial for the smooth functioning of the internal market.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Difficulties have also been experienced in applying the rules on posting of workers specified in Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 and the rules on the administrative requirements laid down in Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council16 to the highly mobile road transport sector. The uncoordinated national measures on the application and enforcement of the provisions on posting of workers in the road transport sector have generated high administrative burdens for non-resident Union operators. This, and have created undue restrictions to the freedom to provide cross-border road transport services having negative side-effects on jobsfairness in inter-company competition in the sector. __________________ 15 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.97, p.1) 16 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11).
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Non-compliance with the rules on the establishment of international road transport companies is creating differences within the single market and contributing to unfairness in inter- company competition. The conditions governing the establishment of international road transport companies should therefore be tightened and made easier to monitor, particularly with a view to combating the creation of ‘letterbox’ companies.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure the effective and proportionate implementation of Directive 96/71/EC in the road transport sector, it is necessary to establish sector-specific rules reflecting the particularity of the highly mobile workforce in the road transport sector and providing a balance between the social protection of drivers and the freedom to provide cross-border services for operators, as well as the need to ensure that inter-company competition in the sector is fair.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The balance between enhancing social and working conditions for drivers and, facilitating the exercise of the freedom to provide road transport services based onand ensuring fair competition between national and foreign operators is crucial for the smooth functioning of the internal market.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 74 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Such balanced criteria should be based on a concept of a sufficient link ofthe simple, readily understood concept of the link between a driver with aand the territory of a host Member State. Therefore, a time threshold should be established, beyond whichis link should be characterised by at least one commercial loading or unloading operation taking place on the territory of the host Member State. Furthermore, the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State shallould apply in case ofto international transport operations. This time threshold should not apply toand cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/200918 and 1073/200919 since the entire transport operation is taking place in a host Member State. As a consequence the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State should apply to cabotage irrespective of the frequency and duration of the operations carried out by a driver. __________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p.88)
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digital tachograph. Introducing the smart tachograph across the board as soon as possible is a prerequisite for effective and efficient monitoring of compliance with the rules on posting of drivers for international transport and cabotage operations.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Difficulties have also been experienced in applying the rules on posting of workers specified in Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 and the rules on the administrative requirements laid down in Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council16 to the highly mobile road transport sector. The uncoordinated national measures on the application and enforcement of the provisions on posting of workers in the road transport sector have generated high administrative burdens for non-resident Union operators, and have created unfair competition between enterprises of the Member States. This created undue restrictions to the freedom to provide cross-border road transport services having negative side-effects on jobs. _________________ 15 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.97, p.1) 16 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11).
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 101 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure the effective and proportionate implementation of Directive 96/71/EC in the road transport sector, it is necessary to establish sector-specific rules reflecting the particularity of the highly mobile workforce in the road transport sector and providing a balance between the social protection of drivers and the freedom to provide cross-border services for operators as well as the need to ensure fair competition between companies in the sector.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 119 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Such balanced criteria should be based on a concept of a sufficient link ofthe simple, readily understood concept of the link between a driver with aand the territory of a host Member State. Therefore, a time threshold should be established, beyond whichis link should be characterised by at least one commercial loading or unloading operation taking place in the host Member State. Furthermore, the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State shallould apply in case ofto international transport operations. This time threshold should not apply toand cabotage operations as defined by Regulations (EC) No 1072/200918 and (EC) No 1073/200919 since the entire transport operation is taking place in a host Member State. As a consequence the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State should apply to cabotage, irrespective of the frequency and duration of the operations carried out by a driver. _________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p.88)
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 140 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digital tachograph. . Introducing the smart tachograph across the board as soon as possible, irrespective of the size or weight of the vehicle, is a prerequisite for effective and efficient monitoring of compliance with the rules on posting of drivers for international transport and cabotage operations.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 167 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carriage or cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 3 days during a period of one calendar month.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
When the period of posting is longer than 3 days, Member States shall apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC for the entire period of posting to their territory during the period of one calendar month referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of the calculation of the periods of posting referred to in paragraph 2: (a) than six hours spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as half a day; (b) a daily working period of six hours or more spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as a full day; (c) periods of availability spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as working period.deleted a daily working period shorter breaks and rest periods as well as
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carriage or cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 3 days during a period of one calendar month.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 297 #

2017/0121(COD)

When the period of posting is longer than 3 days, Member States shall apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC for the entire period of posting to their territory during the period of one calendar month referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 331 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of the calculation of the periods of posting referred to in paragraph 2: (a) a daily working period shorter than six hours spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as half a day; (b) a daily working period of six hours or more spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as a full day; (c) breaks and rest periods as well as periods of availability spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as working period.deleted
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 360 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by […] [The time limit for transposition will be as short as possible and, generally, will not exceed two years] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive in the same time frame as that set out under Article 2 of the legislative act amending Directive 96/71/EC. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point i
(i) the identity of the road transport operator; at least by means of his/her intra- Community tax identification number;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 471 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an obligation for the driver to keep and make availableemployer to ensure that, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the posting declaration and evidence of transport operation taking place in the host Member State, such as an electronic consignment note (e-CMR) or evidence referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, is available on board and presented.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 488 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) an obligation for the driver to keep and make availableemployer to ensure that, where requested at the roadside control, the tachograph records, and in particular the country codes of Member States where the driver has been present when carrying out international road transport operations or cabotage operations, are available on board and presented;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 505 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) an obligation for the driver to keep and make availableemployer to ensure that, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC20, translated into one of the official languages of the host Member State or into English, are available on board and presented; _________________ 20 Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32).
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 519 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) an obligation for the driver to make availableemployer to ensure that, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of payslips for last two months is available on board and presented; during the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide this copy;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 524 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
(ea) An obligation for the employer to deliver, within the worker’s posting period plus a period of 18 months following the expiry of the posting period, in paper or electronic form, proof of payment of wages to drivers.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 535 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) an obligation for the road transport operatoemployer to deliver, after the period of posting, in paper or electronic form, copies of documents referred to in points (b), (c) and (e), at the request of the authorities of the host Member State within a reasonable period of time;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 558 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Member States shall ensure that infringements of the rules on the posting of drivers are regarded as infringements for the purposes of the assessment of good repute as referred to in Article 6 of Regulation 1071/2009.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 564 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall provide for sanctions against shippers, freight forwarders and subcontractors for non- compliance with Article 2 of this Directive where the latter use transport services which involve infringements of this Directive.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 586 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by […] [The time limit for transposition will be as short as possible and, generally, will not exceed two years] at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive in the same time frame as that set out under Article 2 of the legislative act amending Directive 96/71/EC. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 70 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The current Union legal framework provides limited incentives for men to assume an equal share of caring responsibilities. Lack of paid paternity and parental leave in many Member States contributes to the low take-up of such leave by fathers. The imbalance in the design of work-life balance policies between women and men reinforces gender differences between work and care. Conversely, use of work-life balance arrangements by fathers, such as leave or flexible working arrangements, has been shown to have a positive impact in reducing the relative amount of unpaid family work undertaken by women and leaving them more time for paid employment. Furthermore, the implementation of incentive-based family policies to facilitate contractual employment between individuals, whether for childcare in the home or for home- based care for dependent persons, has proven to be a crucial aspect of work-life balance policies that facilitates the rapid return of women to work and their increased participation in the labour market.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In order to provide greater possibility for parents to use parental leave as their children grow up, the right to parental leave should be granted until the child is at least twelvesix years old. Member States should be able to specify the period of notice to be given by the worker to the employer when applying for parental leave and to decide whether the right to parental leave may be subject to a certain period of service. In view of the growing diversity of contractual arrangements, the sum of successive fixed-term contracts with the same employer should be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the period of service. To balance the needs of workers with those of employers, Member States should also be able to decide whether they define if the employer may be allowed to postpone the granting of parental leave under certain circumstances. In such cases, the employer should provide justification for the postponement. Given that flexibility makes it more likely that second parents, in particular fathers, will take up their entitlement to such leave, workers should be able to request to take parental leave on a full-time or part-time basis or in other flexible forms. It should be up to the employer whether or not to accept such a request for parental leave in other flexible forms than full-time. Member States should also assess if the conditions and detailed arrangements of parental leave should be adapted to the specific needs of parents in particularly disadvantaged situations.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) To increase the incentives for workers with children and caring responsibilities, men in particular, to take the periods of leave provided for in this Directive, they should have the right to an adequate allowance while on leave. The level of the allowance should be at least equivalent to what the worker concerned would receive in case of sick leaveset by the Member States and/or the social partners in accordance with the particular circumstances in the Member State in question. Member States should take into account the importance of the continuity of the entitlements to social security, including healthcare.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have an individual right to parental leave of at least four months to be taken before the child reaches a given age which shall be at least twelvesix.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 448 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall take the necessary measures to create a framework which incentivises the development of home childcare arrangements.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 456 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have the right to request parental leave also on a part-time basis, in blocks separated by periods of work or in other flexible forms. Employers shall consider and respond to such requests, taking into account the needs of both employers and workers, in particular in small and medium-sized enterprises. Employers shall justify any refusal of such a request in writing.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 514 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
In accordance with national circumstances, such as national law, collective agreements and/or practice, and taking into account the powers delegated to social partners, Member States shall ensure that workers exercising the rights to leave referred to in Article 4, 5 or 6 will receive a payment or an adequate allowance at least equivalent to what the worker concerned would receive in case of sick leave.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 537 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers with children up to a given age, which shall be at least twelvesix, and carers, have the right to request flexible working arrangements for caring purposes. The duration of such flexible working arrangements may be subject to a reasonable limitation.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 557 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Employers shall consider and respond to requests for flexible working arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, taking into account the needs of both employers and workers, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises. Employers shall justify any refusal of such a request.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 598 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to prohibit less favourable treatment or dismissal of workers on the ground that they have applied for, or have taken, leave referred to in Article 4, 5 or 6, or on the ground that they have exercised their right to flexible working arrangements referred to in Article 9.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
— having regard to International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions Nos 269 and 13105 on minimum wage fixing and Nos 29 andthe abolition of forced labour, No 1052 on the abolition of forced labourSocial Security and ILO Recommendation 202 on Social Protection Floors,
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
– having regard to the report "Minimum Income Schemes in Europe - A study of national policies 2015" prepared for the European Commission by The European Social Policy Network (ESPN) in 2016,
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas the Council Conclusions on the 2017 Annual Growth Survey and the Joint Employment Report adopted by the EPSCO Council on the 3rd March 20171a call on Member States to ensure that social protection systems provide adequate income support and that reforms should continue to focus, amongst others, on providing adequate income support and high quality activation and enabling services; __________________ 1a6885/17 "The 2017 Annual Growth Survey and Joint Employment Report: Political guidance on employment and social policies - Council Conclusions (3 March 2017)" and 6887/17 "JOINT EMPLOYMENT REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL accompanying the Communication from the Commission on the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (3 March 2017)"
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. StressBelieves that it is vital for everyone to have a sufficient minimum income to be able to mall citizens and families in Europe should be entitled to an income support which enables them to cover their living costs; believes that support mechanisms, such as minimum income schemes have to guaranteet their basic requirements non-perpetuation of social dependency and must constitute an incentive to education or entering the job market;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that adequate minimum income schemes as an active inclusion tool promote social participation and inclusion;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that one of the main goals of the Europe 2020 strategy is reducing poverty and social exclusion by at least 20 million people and that still more efforts are needed to reach that goal; believes that minimum income schemes can be a helpful way to reach this objective;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses that the best way to fight poverty and social exclusion are decent jobs; recalls in this context the importance to boost growth, investment and job creation;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of the European Semester in encouraging Member States who do not yet have minimum income schemes to introduce systems of adequate income support;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that, given the many questions minimum income schemes pose, such as accessibility, coverage, financing, entitlement conditions, duration, a concept elaborated at European level on common objectives for national minimum income schemes could be helpful in contributing to a level playing field among Member States;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the importance of the European Semester in monitoring the adequacy of existing minimum income schemes and their impact on reducing poverty, specifically through the country specific recommendations, but also the joint employment report and the Annual Growth Survey;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is of the opinion that adequate minimum income schemes should set minimum incomes at a level equivalent to at leasBelieves that Member States, when setting minimum income schemes should take into account that the at-risk-of- poverty threshold is set at 60 % of median income in the Member State concernedthe national median equivalised disposable income (after social transfers);
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Affirms that growing inequalities threaten the future of the European project, erode its legitimacy and damage trust in the EU as an engine of social progress, a dimension of the Union which needs to be developed, in particular by establishing a European pillar of social rights and by carrying out a targeted revision of the Posting of Workers Directive;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its call for the establishment of an authentic European Pillar of Social Rights and the building of a deeper and fairer social dimension of the EMU, with the necessary legislative, institutional and financial means being devoted to guaranteeing true social progress as the next stage in the European integration process;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its concern about the increasing number of atypical work contracts and forms of non-standard employment linked withwhich can give rise to precarious working conditions, lower wages, exploitation and poorer social security contributions, and rising inequality;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes Eurofound's definition of non-standard employment, which refers to employment relations which are not consistent with the typical or standard model of regular, full-time employment on the basis of an open-ended contract with a single employer;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member States to reform their welfare systems (education, health, pensions and transfers) in order to achieve more effective redistribution and promote fairer distribution, taking into account the new social risks and vulnerable groups that have arisen from the social and economic challenges confronting society, in particular following the financial, economic and then social crises with which the Member States have had to cope;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Stresses how important it is for the Member States to reform their labour markets with a view to offering firms greater flexibility, fostering employment and offering workers greater career security;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas social and economic circumstances and living conditions have changed substantially in recent decades and differ quite considerably between the Member States as well as within them; whereas the concept of multifunctionality has opened up new opportunities for women, thanks to innovation and the creation of new concepts which make it possible to inject fresh dynamism into farming; whereas women are very often the promoters of the development of these additional innovative and dynamic activities on or outside the farm beyond the scope of agricultural production, making it possible to impart real added value to activities in rural areas;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 36 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas keeping the, in a context of growing urbanisation, it is essential to retain an active and dynamic population in rural areas, with particular attention to areas with natural constraints, is essential to society, as the conservation of the environment and the landscape depend on it;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 53 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the status of family farms as primary food producers can onlymust be improved and their farming and livestock activities maintained through providing, promoting innovation by means of adequate financial resources and measures at EU level which are fully used by the Member States;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 77 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas in 2014 women were responsible for about 35 % of total working time in agriculture, carrying out 53.8 % of part-time work and 30.8 % of full-time work, thereby making a significant contribution to agricultural production; whereas work carried out by spouses and other female family members on farms may constitute ‘invisible work’is often indispensable and constitutes nothing short of ‘invisible work’, which is underestimated because of women's lack of professional status;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 97 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas the provision of adequate public services, including care for children and the elderly, are of the first importantce for all inhabitants of rural areas; whereas such services are particularly important for women, given that they have traditionally played a leading role in looking after young and elderly members of the family, and whereas these care services would enable them to devote themselves fully to their work while facilitating the creation of jobs in rural areas;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 104 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas the provision of other basic services such as transport links, access to the Internet, energy provision and social, health and educational services are vital for making rural areas attractive and viable placeareas to live; whereas women have a multifunctional role in rural areas and are therefore particularly dependent on such services in order to ensure a better work- life balance;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 154 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages the Member States to monitor the situation of women in rural areas and to make use of existing measures and specific instruments under the CAP in order to increase the participation of women as beneficiaries; recommends that the Commission keep the provision on thematic sub-programmes on ‘Women in rural areas’ when reforming the CAP in the future, basing these sub-programmes, inter alia, on the marketing of products and direct sale and promotion of products at local or regional level, as they can play a role in creating job opportunities for women in rural areas;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 185 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States to encourage the participation of female spouses or other family members in the joint management of farms and to persuade them to obtain recognised professional status;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 209 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Member States to promote equality between women and men in the various management bodies and representation bodies of all types of agricultural organisations, associations and public institutions;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 233 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to improve conditions for women in rural areas, and not only to provide not only adequate informational material on support possibilities specifically aimed at women farmers and women in rural areas, but alsoparticularly regarding means of access to financing programmes, programmes of which women living in rural areas are often unaware, but also to facilitate access to education and credit, while also promoting the establishment of associations and the provision of wide-ranging professional diversification advice;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 9 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that the unemployment rate among young people still remains too high and calls on the Commission to provide enough financial support to those programmes targeting youth unemployment, commensurate with the support commitments that the Member States entered into when the Youth Guarantee was set up;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of sufficient funding and good budgetary management of programmes aiming at addressing unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, such as the European Social Fund, in particular through the Youth Guarantee objective bolstered by the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the Employment and Social Innovation Programme (EaSI) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD);
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure clarity regarding the terminology in EU law, the term “posting” should only be used for the posting of workers within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.34 In addition, to achieve consistency in treatment between employed and self-employed persons it is necessary that the special rules for the determination of applicable legislation in the cases of workers who are temporarily posted or sent to another Member State should apply consistently to both employed and self-employed persons. __________________ 34 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In the area of unemployment benefits, the rules on the aggregation of periods of insurance should be applied uniformly by all Member States. With the exception of cross-border workers referred to in Article 65(2), the rules on the aggregation of periods for the purpose of conferring entitlement to unemployment benefits should be subject to the condition that an insured person has most recently completed at least three months of insurance in that Member Stateperiods or periods assimilated to insurance periods in that Member State, with a view to ensuring a fairer distribution of the burden, to avoiding abusive practices and ensuring better representativeness of the income taken into account. The previously competent Member State should become competent for all insured persons who do not satisfy this condition. In this case, registration with the employment services of the Member State of most recent insurance should have the same effect as registration with the employment services of the Member State, where the unemployed person had been previously insured.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Following the recommendations in the EU Citizenship Report 201335, there is a need to extend the minimum duration of export of unemployment benefits from three to six months in order to promote mobility and improve the opportunities for unemployed persons moving to another Member State to look for work and their chances for reintegration into the labour market and to address skills mismatches across borders. __________________ 35 COM(2013) 269 final. COM(2013) 269 final.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) This extension of the minimum export period for unemployment benefits from three to six months should be accompanied by compulsory monitoring of the applicant for export through the systematic transmission to the competent state of monthly reports on the applicant made by the state of residence, as well as through the increased exchange of information between the States, with a view to ensuring an appropriate level of cross-border checks on jobseekers residing abroad during the period for which benefits are payable.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The new unemployment compensation mechanism for frontier workers could lead to changes in their conditions and make it more difficult for them to return to the labour market. To overcome these difficulties, it is necessary for the Member State of residence to put in place accompanying measures for these unemployed persons in order to help them in their dealings with the relevant institution of the competent Member State. It is also essential that the new regulatory framework should clarify the possibilities for those unemployed persons to register with the employment services in their Member State of residence, where they will have the opportunity to look for a job, obtain information and take advantage of all the measures to help them return to work, such as training or retraining.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 b (new)
(10b) It is necessary to develop cross- border placement services in order to support applicants in their search for new employment that are as close as possible to the realities of border areas.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To ensure the effective and efficient operation of the coordination rules it is necessary to clarify the rules for determining applicable legislation for employees who pursue their economic activity in two or more Member States in order to provide a greater parity with the conditions that apply to persons who are posted or sent to pursue economic activity in a single Member State. Moreover, the posting rules providing for the continuation of the applicable legislation should only apply to persons who had a prior link to the social security system of the Member State of origin involving membership for at least three months.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) In order to strengthen the link between the substantial activity of the undertaking and the legislation applicable to the person seconded by that undertaking to another Member State on a temporary basis, it is important to stress that the substantial activity must be characterised, inter alia, by a share of more than 25% of the annual turnover in the Member State from which the person is seconded.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 b (new)
(16b) Form A1 must be issued by the competent authority to the applicant company before the start of the assignment. In order to prevent the posting of a worker from being blocked if the competent authority fails to issue the form on time, it must be able to prove that the application was made by the applicant undertaking before the start of the mission.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 – addition
2. In Recital 5, after “the different national legislation for the persons concerned” the following wording is inserted: , subject to the conditions as regards the access to certain social security benefits by economically inactive mobile EU citizens in the host Member State set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.40 __________________ 40 OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5
(2a) Recital 5 is replaced by the following: (5) It is necessary, within the framework of such coordination, to guarantee within the CommunityUnion equality of treatment under theacross different national legislationaw for the persons concerned.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5a
(5a) The Court of Justice has held that Member States are entitled to make the access of economically inactive citizens in the host Member State to social security benefits, which do not constitute social assistance within the meaning of Directive 2004/38/EC subject to a legal right of residence within the meaning of that Directive. The verification of the legal right of residence should be carried out in accordance with the requirement of Directive 2004/38/EC. For these purposes, an economically inactive citizen should be clearly distinguished from a jobseeker whose right of residence is conferred directly by Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In order to improve legal clarity for citizens and institutions, a codification of this case law is necessary.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5b
(5b) Member States should ensure that economically inactive EU mobile citizens are not prevented from satisfying the condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State, as laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This may entail allowing such citizens to contribute in a proportionate manner to a scheme for sickness coverage in the Member State in which they habitually reside.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5c
(5c) Notwithstanding the limitations on the right to equal treatment for economically inactive persons, that arise from the Directive 2004/38/EC or otherwise by virtue of Union law, nothing within this Regulation should restrict the fundamental rights recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the right to human dignity (Article 1), the right to life (Article 2) and the right to healthcare (Article 35).deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 d (new)
(5d) In applying the general principle of equal treatment provided for in this Regulation, the Court of Justice of the European Union held, in its judgments in cases C-140/12 Brey, C-333/13 Dano, C- 67/14 Alimanovic and C-299/14 Garcia- Nieto, that equal treatment may, as regards the access to special non- contributory cash benefits, which also constitute social assistance within the meaning of Directive 2004/38/EC, be subject to the limitations and the conditions set out in Article 24 of that Directive. In order to improve legal clarity for citizens of the Union and Member States’ institutions, that case-law should be codified. Limitations to equal treatment should respect Union law, including the principle of proportionality as interpreted by the Court of Justice.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(5e) The Court of Justice held, in its judgment in case C-308/14, European Commission v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, that Member States may, in conformity with Union law, including the principle of proportionality, make the access of persons covered by Article 11(3)(e) of this Regulation to non-contributory social security benefits covered by Article 3 thereof, subject to the condition that those persons have a legal right of residence in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC. As stated by the Court, the verification of the legal right of residence should be carried out in accordance with the requirements of Directive 2004/38/EC. In order to improve legal clarity for Union citizens and Member States’ institutions, that case-law should be codified.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 f (new)
(5f) It is necessary to ensure that Union citizens are not treated less favourably than other persons who fall within the scope of this Regulation. The limitations to equal treatment introduced in this Regulation should therefore, without prejudice to rights of equal treatment provided for in other Union law, apply mutatis mutandis to those other persons.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 47
(47) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised inby the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work (Article 15), the right to property (Article 17), the right to non-discrimination (Article 21), the rights of the child (Article 24), the rights of the elderly (Article 25), integration of persons with disabilities (Article 26), the right to family and professional life (Article 33); the right to social security and social assistance (Article 34), the right to health care (Article 35) and the right to freedom of movement and residence (Article 45); and has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principle and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Unless otherwise provided for by this Regulation, persons to whom this Regulation applies shall enjoy the same benefits and be subject to the same obligations under the legislation of any Member State as the nationals thereof.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may require that the access of an economically inactive person residing in that Member State to its social security benefits be subject to the conditions of having a right to legal residence as set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.44. __________________ 44deleted OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Regulation (EC) 883/2004
Article 4 a (new)
11a. The following article is inserted: “Article 4a Limitations to equality of treatment for persons not having a legal right of residence under Union law 1. By way of derogation from Article 4 of this Regulation, a Member State whose legislation is applicable on the basis of Article 11(3)(e) of this Regulation may, in accordance with Union law, provide for access to [non-contributory social security benefits covered by Article 3] to be subject to the condition of having a legal right of residence in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC. 2. Member States may apply the limitations referred to in paragraph 1 mutatis mutandis to stateless persons and refugees as well as to the members of their families and to their survivors who do not fulfil the conditions of legal residence or stay in accordance with other relevant Union law.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services46 or sent by that employer to another Member State to perform work on that employer’s behalf shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such work does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not posted or sent to replace another employed or self-employed person previously posted or sent within the meaning of this Article. __________________ 46 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. After the end of a posting as referred to in paragraph 1, the employed person concerned shall not be posted by the same undertaking to the same Member State until two months after the end of the previous posting. In exceptional circumstances, an undertaking may apply to the competent authority for a derogation from the first subparagraph.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 13 – paragraph 1
13a. Article 13(1) is amended as follows: 1. A person who normally pursues an activity as an employed person in two or more Member States shall be subject: (a) to the legislation of the Member State of residence if he/she pursues a substantial part of his/her activity in that Member State; or, (b) if he/she does not pursue a substantial part of his/her activity in this/her Member State of residence: (i) to the legislation of the Member State in which the registered office or place of business of the undertaking or employer is situated if he/she is employed by one undertaking or employer; or (ii) to the legislation of the Member State in which the registered office or place of business ofemploying him/her is situated and in which the undertakings or employers is situated if he/she is employed by two or more undertakings or employers which have their registered office or place of business in only one Member State; or (iii) to the legislation of the Member State in which the registered office or place of business of the undertaking or employer is situated other than the Member State of residence if he/she is employed by two or more undertakings or employers, which have t pursues a substantial part of its activities; (ii) to the legislation of the Member State in which the employee carries out his/heir registered office or place of business in two Member States, one of which is the Member State of residence; or (iv) to the legislation of the Member State of residence if he/she is employed by two or more undertakings or employers, at least two of which have their registered office or place of business in different Member States other than the Member State of residence."predominant activity in situations where (i) is not applicable.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 13 – paragraph 3
13b. Article 13(3) is amended as follows: 3. A person who normally pursues an activity as an employed person and an activity as a self-employed person in differentin two or more Member States shall be subject: (a) to the legislation of the Member State in whichof residence if he/she pursues an activity as an employed person substantial part of his/her activity in that Member State, or, (b) if he/she does not pursues a such anbstantial part of his/her activity in two or morehis/her Member States of residence, to the legislation determined in accordance with paragraph 1of the Member State in which he/she pursues his/her predominant activity.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 16 a (new)
14a. The following article is inserted: “Article 16a Prior issuance of the document on applicable legislation. The prior issuance by the sending institution to the host institution of a document attesting to the social security legislation applicable to a worker, drafted in accordance with Articles 11 to 16 and Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, before posting to the host country, shall be compulsory. If the sending institution is not in a position to issue this document before the start of the secondment, it must be able to prove that the application for the issue of the document was made before the start of the secondment.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three months ofone or more periods which together correspond to at least three months of insurance or cover equivalent to insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 375 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. Where an unemployed person does not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, or cover equivalent to insurance, periods of employment or self- employment in that Member State is less than three months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a.”.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 62 – paragraph 1
19a. In Article 62, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. The competent institution of a Member State whose legislation provides for the calculation of benefits on the basis of the amount of the previous salary or professional income shall take into account exclusively the salary or professional income received by the person concerned in respect of his/her last activity or activities as an employed or self-employed person under the said legislation.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(-a) The following subparagraph 1(b)a shall be inserted: (ba) mandatory follow-up of the unemployed person must be carried out by the Member State to which he goes through systematic forwarding to the competent State of monthly reports on the applicant.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 406 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64 a – paragraph 1
In the situations referred to in Article 61(2), the Member State to whose legislation the unemployed person was previously subject shallwhich has become competent toshall provide unemployment benefits. They shall be provided at the expense of the competent institution forbenefits within the limits of the period laid down in Article 64(1)(c), if the unemployed person makes himself/herself available to the employment services in the Member State of most recent insurance and adheres to the conditions laid down under the legislation of that Member State. The benefits paid by the State which has become competent shall continue to be borne by it. Article 64 (2) to (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 413 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. An unemployed person who, during his or her last activity as an employed or self-employed person, resided in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall make himself or herself available to the former employer or to the employment services in the competent Member State, while retaining the option of registering in parallel with the employment services of his State of residence or with a cross-border placement service and benefiting from all accompanying measures and back-to- work assistance on offer. Such a person shall receive benefits in accordance with the legislation of the competent Member State as if he or she were residing in that Member State. These benefits shall be provided by the institution of the competent Member State.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 415 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The authorities of the competent Member State and of the Member State of residence shall cooperate closely and clarify to job seekers the competence of the public employment service responsible for their follow-up. They shall also ensure that exchanges between the competent institution and the job seeker are carried out in a language understood by the latter, possibly involving EURES advisers in these services.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 422 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a wholly unemployed person who, during the last activity as an employed or self-employed person, resided in a Member State other than the competent Member State, and who had not completed at least 12 months of unemployment insuranceperiods of insurance, employment or self- employment exclusively under the legislation of the competent Member State shall make himself or herself available to the employment service of the Member State of residence. Such a person shall receive benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State of residence as if he or she had completed all periods of insurance under the legislation of that Member State. Those benefits shall be provided by the institution of the Member State of residence. Alternatively, a wholly unemployed person referred to in this paragraph, who would be entitled to an unemployment benefit solely under the national legislation of the competent Member State if he or she resided there, may instead opt to make themselves available to the employment services in that Member State and to receive benefits in accordance with the legislation of that Member State as if he or she were residing there.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 423 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 3
3. If a wholly unemployed person referred to in paragraphs 1 or 2 does not wish to become or remain available to the employment services of the competent Member State after having been registered there, and wishes to seek work in the Member State of residence or the Member State of last activity Article 64 shall apply mutatis mutandis, except Article 64(1)(a), thus enabling frontier workers to be exempted from the four weeks of prior registration in the competent State before being able to export their entitlements to their State of residence. The competent institution may extend the period referred to in the first sentence of Article 64(1)(c) up to the end of the period of entitlement to benefits.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 4
4. A wholly unemployed person referred to in this Article may in addition to making themselves available to the employment services of the competent Member State also make themselves available to the employment services of the other Member State or a cross-border placement service.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 451 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 70 – paragraph 4 a (new)
23a. In Article 70, the following paragraph is added: “4a. By way of derogation from Article 4 of this Article, a Member State may, in accordance with Union law, provide that access to the benefits referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, which also constitute social assistance within the meaning of Directive 2004/38/EC, is subject to the fulfilment of the conditions for equal treatment under Article 24 of that Directive by the claimant.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 464 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 76 a – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– the issuance, the format and the contents of a portable electronic document certifying the social security legislation which applies to the holder,
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 546 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In Article 5, the following paragraph is added: ‘4a. In the event of intentional fraud as defined in Article 1 of this Regulation, the competent authorities of the State which receives the document may proceed in the same way as if the document had not been issued.’
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, a ‘person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services52 or sent by that employer to another Member State’ shall include a person who is recruited with a view to being posted or sent to another Member State, provided that immediately before the start of his employment, the person concerned ihas already been subject to the legislation of the sending Member State for at least three months in accordance with Title II of the basic Regulation. __________________ 52 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1. OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 568 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 14 – paragraph 2
(aa) Paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 2. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, the words ‘which normally carries out its activities there’ shall refer to an employer that ordinarily performs substantial activities, other than purely internal management activities, in the territory of the Member State in which it is established, taking account of all criteria characterising the activities carried out by the undertaking in question;, such as the requirement that an undertaking should generate more than 25% of its turnover in the Member State from which it posts a worker. The relevant criteria must be suited to the specific characteristics of each employer and the real nature of the activities carried out.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 574 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 10
10. For the determination of the applicable legislation under paragraphs 8 and 9, the institutions concerne(ba) Paragraph 10 is replaced with the following: ‘10. The determination of the applicable legislation within the meaning of Article 13 of the basic Regulation shall apply for a maximum period of 24 months. Once that period shall take into account the situation projected for the following 12 calendar months.s elapsed, the applicable legislation must be reassessed in the light of the employee’s situation.’
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 578 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
8a. In Article 15, paragraph 10 is replaced with the following: ‘1. Unless otherwise provided for by Article 16 of the implementing Regulation, where a person pursues his activity in a Member State other than the Member State competent under Title II of the basic Regulation, the employer or, in the case of a person who does not pursue an activity as an employed person, the person concerned shall inform the competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is applicable thereof, whenever possible in advance. That institution shall without delay make information concerning the legislation applicable to the person concerned, pursuant to Article 11(3)(b) or Article 12 or Article 13 of the basic Regulation, available to the person concerned and to the institution designated by the competent authority of the Member State in which the activity is pursued.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 582 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If that institution determines that the legislation of another Member State applies, it shall do so provisionally and shall without delay inform the institution of the Member State which it considers to be competent of this provisional decision. The decision shall become definitive within two months after the institution designated by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned has been informed of it, unless the latter institution informs the first institution and the persons and the employers concerned that it cannot yet accept the provisional determination or that it takes a different view on this.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 586 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. The competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is determined to be applicable either provisionally or definitively shall without delay inform the person concerned and/or his or her employer.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 270 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 62 – paragraph 4a (new)
3 a. In Article 62, the following paragraph is added: 4a. Member states may apply the provisions of this Chapter to areas producing wine suitable for producing wine spirits with a geographical indication as registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. For the purposes of those provisions, these areas may be treated as areas where wines with a protected designation of origin or protected geographical indication may be produced.
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The binding occupational limit values should be reviewed regularly and at least every 5 years and revised when necessary in the light of scientific data. This revision should duly take into account the recommendations and opinions of the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at work (ACSH) which is composed of three full members per Member State, representing national governments, trade unions and employers' organisations.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) There is no harmonised methodology for measuring workers' exposure to carcinogens, mutagens and substances that are toxic for reproduction at European level. The European Commission should shortly develop such an EU methodology in order to ensure on the one hand, similar and high-level protection for workers and on the other hand, a level playing field.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 d (new)
(2d) More transparency on health risks incurred by workers should be provided by including two new columns to Annex III in order to indicate the residual cancer risk associated with each Binding Occupational Exposure Limit and the date of the last estimation.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at work also assists the Commission, by giving for instance opinions on the Occupational Exposure Limits which should be set at EU level pursuant to Council Directive 98/24/EC and Directive 2004/37/EC in order to protect workers from chemical risks. These opinions are based in particular on the latest available scientific data and socioeconomic impacts.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2004/37/EC
Title
-1. The title is replaced by the following: “Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or, mutagens or reprotoxics at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC)” lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:229:0023:0034:EN:PDF)Or. en (http://eur-
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whetherand in the light of the proven cases of fraud and social dumping, it is clear that the Posting of Workers Directive still strikesdoes not strike exactly the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers properly. Against this backdrop of skewed and unfair competition for firms, there is an urgent need to clarify the rules, make sure that they are applied uniformly and bring about genuine social convergence.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In order to rule out any risk of the law being circumvented through the use of a series of short postings during which the same task is carried out, the aggregate duration of postings should be taken into account.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In a competitive internal market, service providers compete not only on the basis of a labour costs, giving rise to social dumping which undermines the competitiveness of firms, and in particular SMEs, but also on factors such as productivity and efficiency, or the quality and innovation of their goods and services.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers and posted workers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration as defined by national law and applicable collective agreements on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive as the transparency and the access to information is a key element for service providers. The provision of information on the single website should be in line with national law and practice and respect the autonomy of the social partners.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration. Where such rules on remuneration exist at national level, the Member State may apply them in a non- discriminatory manner to undertakings posting workers to its territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.deleted
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 2a – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workers performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) conditions of workers’ accommodation.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 395 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitthe concept of remuneration shall be determined by the national law and/or praction awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, ince of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 419 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
In the context of remuneration, elements which are mandatory under both the national law of the host Member State and the national law applying to the individual employment contract, and which are essentially similar, shall only be paid once to avoid double payment whereby the worker shall always receive the amount which is more favourable.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 432 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration as defined by national law and applicable collective agreements in accordance with point (c).
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 449 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a
(b) The following paragraph is added: 1a. territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration, , the Member State may, on a non– discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory.deleted If undertakings established in the
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 474 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) Paragraph 7, second subparagraph, is replaced by the following: Allowances specific to the posting shall be considered to be part of the minimum wage, unless they are. However, allowances paid in reimbursement of expenditure actually incurred on account of the posting, such as expenditure on travel, board and lodging, cannot, under any circumstances, be deducted from the minimum wage.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 498 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 10
(e) The second subparagraph of paragraph 10 is deleted.Paragraph 10 is replaced by the following: 10. This Directive shall not preclude the application by Member States, in compliance with the Treaty, and in line with national law and practice, of terms and conditions of employment to national undertakings and to the undertakings of other States, on a basis of equalityperating ofn treatment, of: – employmentheir territory on matters other than those referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, in the case of public policy provisions, – employment laid down in the collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 and concerning activities other than those referred to in the Annex. including non-discriminatory measures to ensure the protection of workers, fair competition and the proper functioning of the labour market. terms and conditions of terms and conditions of
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that the possible introduction of a services passport for companies, which aims to further promote the free movement of services, should be without prejudice to the competence of the host Member State to ensure the effective enforcement and control of national and European employment legislation;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points to the need to provide the EU budget with a genuine own resources system, thereby lowering the proportion of GNI-based national contributions to the budget;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the employment rate in the EU currently stands at 69.2%, which is well below the Europe 2020 target, and calls for increased European public investment in job creation and skills, to be achieved by ring-fencing and strengthening the European Social Fund;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Maintains that investment in research and development is crucially important for the competitiveness of the European economy and for job creation; notes, however, that, according to the most recent Eurostat figures, R & D investment accounted for just 2.03% of EU GDP, which is well below the Europe 2020 target; urges the Commission, therefore, to find a way of fully offsetting the cuts by which the EFSI has been financed at the expense of the Horizon 2020 budget;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the resources of the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived are not sufficient to address the unprecedented flow of refugees and that competition for scarce funds may lead to social conflict; calls on the Commission to increase social policy funding and in that way enhance cohesion policy in order to help refugees to integrate into society and enter the labour market while doing its best to achieve its goals of promoting employment and social inclusion; insists that the ESF share amount to 25% of the total cohesion budget, that no reductions in the national envelopes for ESF measures be made and that sufficient cash flow be provided annually for payments from the EU budget;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Maintains that the common agricultural policy (CAP) contributes significantly to growth and employment, especially in rural areas, and points out that one job in the agricultural sector generates seven jobs elsewhere; calls for the amounts entered under MFF heading 2 to remain unchanged, bearing in mind that the CAP is vitally important for employment; points out that the CAP not only helps to reduce farm income volatility, particularly in times of crisis, but also helps farmers, young people included, to set up in farming and develop their farms, making them profitable, prosperous, and a source of direct and indirect employment;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to combat early school-leaving by adequately informing students about future labour market opportunities and qualitative apprenticeships and work placements; points to students leaving school with no qualifications as being one of the greatest challenges for our societies – and combating it one of our main goals – as it leads to a precarious existence and social exclusion; points out that besides adjusting training systems, specific measures must be introduced for those in greatest difficulty;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underscores the importance of recognising competencies acquired in non- formal environments; calls on the Member States to ensure the coherent validation of formal, non-formal and informal traineeships and learning with a view to bridging the gap between the skills shortages observed in the European labour market and the many young job seekers;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2351(INI)

6. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Erasmus+ programme, thereby fostering further cross-border career and labour mobility; points out that mobility in training is a vital asset when it comes to entering the job market; emphasises the importance of implementing a European framework to promote mobility as part of apprenticeship and vocational training;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Youth Guarantee, for example by putting in place career guidance systems and compulsory registration for the unemployed in order to gain a picture of the real situation as regards youth unemployment.; points to the importance of conducting an assessment of the implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative by the Member States in 2014 and 2015; stresses the importance of continuing this programme if the assessment shows it to have been effective in enabling young people to acquire skills and enter employment;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2015/2351(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for better coordination between education and training curricula and the needs of the changing labour markets; calls for campaigns to provide information, raise awareness and enhance mobility programmes to be established in all general and vocational educational establishments in the EU in order to meet the policy objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU and in view of the persistent inequalities between urban, suburban and rural areas;
2016/04/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 147 #

2015/2351(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises the importance of addressing skills shortages and mismatches by promoting and facilitating mobility for learners through a better use of all EU tools and programmes; points out that mobility in training is a vital asset when it comes to entering the job market; stresses the need to implement measures aimed at ensuring coordination, complementarity and coherence between the structural funds for mobility, including the European Social Fund (ESF), for example, and other programmes such as Erasmus+;
2016/04/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 162 #

2015/2351(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that early school leaving and students leaving school with no qualifications are among the greatest challenges for our societies – and addressing them must be one of our main goals – as they lead to a precarious existence and social exclusion; points out that mobility, adapting education systems and implementing individualised measures can offer solutions for the most disadvantaged people in order to reduce the dropout rate in education and training;
2016/04/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 42 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that vocational education and training (VET) and VET mobility play a vital economic and social role in Europe as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for all citizens, including those from socially disadvantaged groups, unemployed young people, migrants and women, who are all under-represented in VET and those particularly affected by the economic crisis; calls on the Commission and the Member States to position VET as a choice which leads to a promising career, make it accessible to all, ensure gender balance and non- discrimination, and guarantee that it is adequately funded;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to work with the Members States on stronger cooperation between education establishments and key stakeholders (businesses, VET facilities, research organisations, social partners, chambers of commerce and industry, the equivalent professional bodies for craft trades and farmers, local/regional authorities and the youth sector) in order to enhance the responsiveness of the education and VET systems to labour market needs, and to guarantee that this cooperation is reflected in Erasmus+; believes that active involvement of beneficiaries in the design and implementation of the programme increases its success and added value;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, despite clear improvements in recognition and validation systems in education and VET, problems still persist; calls for specific targets such as the implementation of a fully operational credit transfer system and recognition, and for validation of competences acquired through non-formal and informal learning.; points out that, at present, only 1% of young people in work- related training schemes, including apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during their training; points out that it is essential to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher education students and thus meet the objectives of the fight against unemployment, particularly youth unemployment;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas professional integration is a stepping stone to social inclusion;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that in order to facilitate the social inclusion and integration of refugees into the labour market, it is necessary to address serious and multi-faceted issues such as discrimination, linguistic barriers – which are the first obstacle to integration, diverse socio-economic and cultural backgrounds, health needs, including psychosocial and post-trauma support, family reunification and the significant share of disadvantaged groups among refugees, in particular worrying numbers of children, including unaccompanied children, people with disabilities, the elderly and women8, who require responses tailored to their specific problems; _________________ 8 http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset- Management/oecd/social-issues-migration- health/making-integration-work- humanitarian-migrants_9789264251236-en
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls the extremely worrying situation of women in the refugee camps in Europe, and in particular their living and hygiene conditions, which require emergency sanitary measures;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Points up the major differences in social and economic circumstances within the EU; stresses the importance of taking them into account when refugees are relocated, in order to maximise their vocational integration prospects;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Points out that, too often, asylum seekers are first relocated to places where they cannot be vocationally integrated; stresses the importance of providing solutions that allow persons who have been given refugee status to settle in places where they can be vocationally integrated;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the need for an early, fair, transparent and free-of-charge assessment of refugees and asylum seekers’ formal and non-formal skills, as well as recognition of their qualifications, in order to develop tailored measures allowing them to make full use of their potential, and to match labour supply and demand in the host countries; stresses the importance of promptly introducing more effective arrangements for recognising and validating qualifications, experience and skills; points out that EU citizens as a whole would benefit from such effective arrangements;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights that the main EU funds available for social inclusion and integration into the labour market, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), as well as the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Fund for Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), have differing focuses, target groups and management modes at Member State level; points out that the objective of vocational integration of refugees must be reflected in greater importance being attached to the European Social Fund;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that access to justice and protection should be ensured to all victims of exploitation; highlights the crucial work done by trade unionhe social partners, civil society and volunteer organisations in reaching out to these workers and in providing them with the information and support they need;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on Member States to cut red tape in order to make it easier for employable persons to enter the labour market; points out that such action would be both conducive to the integration of refugees and, more generally, benefit EU citizens as a whole;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages the Member States to shorten the processing time of applications for international protection, with due regard for the rights of the individuals concerned, and to extend early intervention measures such as language training, skills assessment and civic integration courses in particular to those asylum seekers who have good prospects of being granted international protection;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, owing to their smaller scale, SMEs are less able than large companies to comply with regulatory standards;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the SME sector is important at regional level and particularly in rural regions;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas too many posts remain vacant because some training systems are inadequate for today’s labour market;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the potential for SME job creation would increase tenfold if training better met the needs of the workplace;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that a European plan for mobility in European apprenticeships and professional training must be established;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Takes the view that reducing the regulatory and administrative burden, together with improving the quality of regulation and enforcement, constitute the right way to lower SMEs’ costs, including labour costs, in order to increase their job creation potential; stresses that this should not undermine worker protections;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider that SMEs face specific obstacles and should therefore be exempted from excessively burdensome administrative procedures, while always ensuring that they provide their employees with the necessary health and safety standards protection;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member States to remove the remaining administrative barriers with a view to facilitating market access for micro-enterprises and SMEs from other Member Statensure equitable access conditions to their national market for SMEs from other Member States, in compliance with the legislation of the host Member State and European legislation, and prioritise the fight against bogus self-employment and ‘letter box companies;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment regarding the implications of the future TTIP agreement for SME jobs in the SME sector in all Member States;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the EGF suffers from a serious lack of awareness on the part of the Member States, the social partners and companies; calls on the Commission to launch an awareness-raising campaign for Member States;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. RecogniStresses the challenges faced by applications underimportance of the arrangements laid down in Article 4(b) of the current regulation for SMEs since they enable sectors of the economy to be restructured at the regional level; recognises the challenges faced by applications made under these provisions; strongly recommends that these additional challenges be recognised and accommodated by the Commission and the Member States in the planning and application stages and that adequate resources be allocated to the management and delivery of these cases;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that Erasmus and other mobility programmes have fostered European integration and strengthened the idea of citizenship; notes that these programmes have had an indirect impact on employment; points out that mobility in the context of vocational education and training (VET) is fundamental to students' personal development, which forms the basis of the fight against unemployment, enhancesof improving employability and of reducesing the skills gap;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas entrepreneurs, chambers of commerce and industry and the equivalent professional bodies for the craft trades and farmers, and trade unions must be part of the reflection on mobility structures;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 38 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the important role and the results of existing programmes and initiatives for mobility; calls on the Commission to improve indicators and assessment criteria so as to be able to monitor on a more regular basis the effectiveness of EU programmes and to make any necessary improvements;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 49 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the existing mobility initiatives have contributed to improving not only learners’ civic values and sense of belonging to Europe, but also their academic skills and job prospects, more specifically those skills linked to problem- solving capacity, planning and structuring, and that mobility develops their capacity to act and adapt in face of new situations, decision making,and to take decisions and improve their knowledge of foreign languages, and communication, as well as those related to personal skills that impact employability such asenhances their self- confidence, motivation, curiosity, critical thinking and, assertiveness and communication skills; points out that these general skills clearly help to make them more employable;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 62 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a . Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the agencies to work towards reducing the gap between the training on offer and what actually awaits young people in businesses;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the key aspects that need to be taken into account when assessing the success of the implementation of mobility actions: learners’ economic capacity to engage in mobility; recognition of studiestraining content between countries, whether via credits or certificates; and level of language knowledge; organisation of the curricula or studies;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 74 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Urges that the manufacturing sector, including SMUs, should be more closely involved in the framing, implementation and funding of VET mobility programmes; believes that flexible and constructive dialogue between training centres and firms will ensure that VET is a success; notes that it is essential to define clearly at a European level the division of responsibilities between training centres and businesses for the training of learners;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the European UnionPoints out that, at present, only 1% of young people in work-related training schemes, who include apprentices, are involved in mobility schemes during the course of their training; points to the vital need to create the conditions for greater apprentice mobility within the EU, so as to give apprentices the same opportunities as higher-education students; encourages the European Union therefore to take action within the bounds of its powers in this area to define a statute of the ‘European Apprentice’;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 82 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to put in place a communications strategy aimed at both training centres and businesses;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that early school leaving is one of the most distinctand leaving school without any qualifications are growing problems faced bythat mobility target groups, and that better vocational options lead to fewer dropouts fromprogrammes need to address, and that those programmes therefore need to be promoted and access to vocational training needs to be improved in order to reduce the number of people dropping out of education and training;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 85 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to make efforts to reduce the administrative burdens on businesses and on SMUs especially in relation to their training policies, so that more young people can benefit from vocational training arrangements;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Asks for complementary measures between the European Social Fund (ESF) and Erasmus+, and good coordination of all actions at all levels – national, regional and local planning;deleted
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 118 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10. Reiterates the need for measures to ensure coordination, complementarity and consistency between structural funds such as the European Social Fund (ESF) and programmes such as Erasmus+ at national, regional and local level;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 122 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the need to compensate for the obstacles that derive from the lower socioeconomic status of students in VET and European Voluntary Service (EVS) participants through measures such as a possible increase in the amounts of individual grants from the Commission, or an increase in the contributions made by Member States and regional and local administrations, intermediate institutions or NGOs, whether funded from their own budgets or via partnership schemes involving businesses, foundations and organisations that collaborate in the system of qualification and vocational training in their region or territory;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 177 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Supports all accompanying measures first of all to assist apprentices in their wish to go abroad and later to help them better communicate their acquired skills through mobility, and develop their self- assertiveness in order to make their know- how and the richness of their experience visible and worthwhile;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 186 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises the need, at all levels, for good communication vis-à-vis entrepreneurs to have them on board to centralise information and data on mobility programmes in order to provide a practical and effective service to all those who wish to obtain information; calls therefore further recognition of the experienced acquired by the young people taking advantage of mobility schemesor the creation of a one-stop shop in order to create contacts among candidates, training centres, chambers of commerce and industry, chambers of skilled and craft trades, chambers of agriculture and undertakings, and enable them to communicate with one another;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 193 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Supports all measures in line with Erasmus+ objectives taken by entrepreneurs to develop mobility schemes for young employees or apprentices either by branch of activity or in interaction with bodies representing the industries, such as chambers of commerce and industry, chambers of skilled and craft trades and the relevant trade unions;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 197 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new) - after para 22
Obstacles to mobility: reducing the main factors which act as a brake on actors under the programme
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 201 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Asks for the setting up of a one-stop- shop mechanism for pooling data and communication tools in order to provide a convenient and efficient service for those seeking information and support on the various mobility programmes existing at EU, national, regional and local level;deleted
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 207 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Draws attention to the cumbersome nature of the administrative procedures that undertakings are required to complete in order to establish partnerships; calls for appropriate and coherent accompanying and follow-up measures to be instituted which take account of the legal requirements that for specified periods bind the apprentice, the training centre, the intermediate chambers and the undertaking; observes that the complexity of the financial and administrative rules and their unsuitability, inter alia, for grouped projects, hamper the educational institutions and undertakings involved in the project;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 212 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. In view of the 2014 figures on the Erasmus+ programme, calls for a reduction in the disparity between applications for mobility and the award of finance, in order to attain the political objectives set;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 217 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. In order to meet the objectives of the European Union’s economic, social and regional cohesion policy, and in view of the persistent inequalities between urban, periurban and rural areas, calls for the launching of campaigns to provide information, raise awareness and highlight the value of mobility programmes in all general and vocational education establishments in the Union;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 219 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 d (new)
22d. With due regard for the European Union’s aims of combating social exclusion and inequalities, encourages the adoption of corrective measures to ensure equal opportunities in the conduct and realisation of mobility projects;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 220 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 e (new)
22e. Draws attention to the persistent financial difficulties facing candidates in the implementation of Erasmus+ programme measures; observes that candidates who have less funds of their own to invest in their mobility remain at a disadvantage in the pursuit of mobility; accordingly, stresses the need for measures to possibly increase the amounts of individual scholarships;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 221 #

2015/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 f (new)
22f. Notes that the obstacles to mobility include reluctance due to having to go away: observes that emotional distance from the family and anxiety arising from the need to use a foreign language which may initially be unknown or relatively unfamiliar inspire fear in candidates for mobility; calls therefore for a pedagogic and reception framework for people to be established to assist them both before and during their mobility, in order to increase its success;
2015/12/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 6 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Articles 151 and 153 of TFEU as well as Article 9 TFEU guaranteeing adequate social protection,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 concerning the application of the principle of free movement of services to maritime transport within Member States, __________________ 1a OJ L 364, 12.12.1992, p. 7.
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the recently adopted decision on Establishing the European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of Undeclared Work,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the increased trend towards undeclared work, and bogus self- employment, outsourcing and subcontracting, leading to an increase in precarious jobs and deteriorating levels of worker protection;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment in case C- 341/05 Laval of 18 December 200710 highlighted on one hand the legitimacy of the struggle against social dumping, and delimitation of respective actions based on the provisions of the Treaty on the other; __________________ 10 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?te xt=&docid=71925&pageIndex=0&doclang =EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1& cid=498309
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. having regard to the importance of the declaration by the President of the Commission of the principle of ‘equal pay and social protection for the same work at the same place’ for all European workers; whereas legal clarification of this principle and its application is required;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the free movement of persons is essential to the European project, and also a prerequisite for achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion goals in order to bring about a solid and sustainable level of competitiveness in all Member States;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas undeclared work harms not only workers, but also employers who observe the rules and who thus find themselves facing unfair competition from employers who do not;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the posting of workers should facilitate the sharing of skills and professional experience, and not be a cause of social dumping;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas rigorous action on the part of Member State labour inspectorates and closer, systematic coordination between them are essential;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. having regard to the importance of assessing the impact of the implementation of Directive 2014/67/EU, once it has been transposed in all Member States, in order to determine its real impact in the struggle against the various types of fraud identified in the context of the posting of workers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 81 on labour inspectionPoints out that 28 Member States have ratified ILO Convention No. 81 on labour inspection; calls on Member States to ensure that all its provisions are implemented;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Member States to increase the staffing levels and resources ofor their labour inspectorates and their liaison offices, in particular for training in the arrangements governing the posting of workers, interpretation and translation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Member State to swiftly finalise the implementation of the Enforcement Directive on Posting of workers 2014/67/EU and calls on the Commission to closely monitor the transposition and exercise of corresponding national laws in practice;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the creation of a European body ofon Member States to establish channels for dialogue between their labour inspectorates with regard to cross- border labour inspectors towork, so that they can carry out on- the-spot checks in suspected cases of social dumping, including by identifying 'letterbox companies', which body would work in coordination with the platform for combating undeclared work in order to limit the financial burden involved;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the implementation by Member States of electronic systems for registering the prior declaration of posting missionsNotes that non-declaration or irregular declarations are among the most common types of fraud; recommends that the prior declaration be made mandatory in all Member States; also calls for the implementation by Member States of electronic systems for registering the prior declaration of posting missions, which would make declarations easier to consult, facilitate coordination between Member States and limit the current legal uncertainties linked to the differences in procedures and documents from one country to another;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 189 concerning decent work for domestic workMember States to establish legal frameworks allowing for lawful employment of domestic workers and carers, in order to provide legal certainty for both the workers and their potential employers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls its appeal for the creation of ‘Calls on the Member States to improve considerably information exchange concerning social security for posted workers; recalls its appeal to the Commission to ‘look into the opportunity, and, if necessary, to provide a forgery- proof European social security card (...), on which could be stored all the data needed to verify the bearer’s employment relationship’1; wishes all and which could take into account the information associated with the worker's postings to feature on this cardposting missions of the worker; __________________ 1 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA- 2014-0012+0+DOC+XML+V0//FR
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Stresses the need to complement the action against the breaches of social rights with a fight against tax fraud and tax evasion, in order to guarantee a fair competition and a level playing field for the enterprises;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to combat the phenomenon of letterbox companies by applying more generally the principle that each company should have a single corporate headquarters; recalls the importance of enterprises having a ‘genuine activity’ in their Member State of origin as a justification for the posting or workers; recalls the rejection by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs of the proposal for a directive on single-person limited liability companies;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that Directive 96/71/EC refers only to Articles 57 and 66 TFEU relating to the freedom to provide services and freedom of movement; believes that its legal basis must be complemented by Articles 151 and 153 TFEUdraws attention, further, to the importance of Articles 151 and 153 TFEU, which set the goals for the EU and its Member States concerning the promotion of employment, the improvement of living and working conditions, adequate social protection, the promotion of social dialogue and the fight against exclusion;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 372 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the notion of 'minimum wage' contained in Directive 96/71/EC should be revised to ensure equal pay for posted workers and local workers in similar positions; stresses the need to respect the collective agreements of the host country and to ensure, through the revision of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, the payment of gross earnings corresponding to the remuneration paid by the employer before the deduction of taxes and social security contributions payable by employees and withheld by the employer; recalls that specific postings bonusesclarified; stresses the need to respect the collective agreements of the host country; recalls that sums to cover expenses relating to posting, such as board and lodging, should be paid on top of remuneration;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes the intention of the European Commission to publish the Labour Mobility Package which will allegedly contain certain provisions with regards to posting of workers; calls on the European Commission to make sure new proposals continue to facilitate the freedom to provide services, while protecting workers' rights and are clear, proportionate, non- discriminatory and justified;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 403 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Wishes maximum periods of postings to be limitedlaid down in Directive 96/71/EC and temporary employment agencies to be excluded from the scope of the directivehe posting of workers in the country in which they reside to be forbidden;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that due to differences in Member States labour laws it is difficulty to make a clear distinction between employees and self- employed workers at EU level; thus in order to combat bogus self- employment calls on the Commission to propose specific recommendations based on indicators of the existence of an employment relationship according to the ILO Convention 198 on Employment Relationship Recommendation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 436 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for increased controls on the implementation of working time and rest times in transport, a sector which has been hit particularly hard by unfair competition; calls for the introduction of automatic digital records and the development of 'smart tachographs' for all means of transport, including inland waterway transport; recalls the desire expressed in its resolution of 3 July 2012 on road transport that 'by 2020 all vehicles which are not exempted from the application of this Regulation in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 (...) shall be fitted with a smart tachograph’12; __________________ 12 www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do? type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2012- 0271&language=EN&ring=A7-2012- 0195#BKMD-7
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 488 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that the rules on cabotage are not sufficiently precise, which facilitates the practice of some road operators of engaging in permanent cabotage; wishes cabotage operations to be subject to mandatory prior notificationCalls for the effective application of the rules on posting to all transport workers covered by Directive 96/71 EC, whatever the implementing rules for transport services and, in particular, cabotage;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 505 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to clarify the working and employment conditions applicable to haulage workers operating in the territory of another Member State, when engaging in transit or cabotage work; also encourages the Commission to reflect on a specific arrangement for highly mobile workers to defend their rights and ensure the smooth functioning of that sector;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 548 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission shortly to submit a proposal for a directive on requirements with regard to the crews of vessels (regardless of the flag it flies) providing regular cargo, passenger and ferry services operating between Member States so that the conditions applicable on board a vessel are those of the State applying the most favourable standards for workersMember State with which the seafarer's work is most closely connected;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 560 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission, drawing on the US Jones Act, to take the necessary measures to ensure that vessels carrying goods between two or more European ports are built in Europe, fly an EuropeanEA flag and are owned by a European companycompany situated in the EEA and mainly manned by EEA-domiciled seafarers; calls for the law that is applicable to be associated with the country in which the vessel owner is basseafarers employment agreement to be governed by the Member State with which the seafarer's work is most closely connected;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 574 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission rapidlyRecalls the importance of tying the development of the digital and sharing economy to the protection of workers in this new sector; calls on the Commission to evaluate the provisions of European legislation applying to this sector and, if necessary, to draw up proposals to combat unfair competition in the digital and sharing economy;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 599 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. TakStresses the view that a social protocol is necessary to ensure the primacy ofimportance of equality between fundamental rights overand economic freedoms;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 638 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Desires that wage floors be established, possibly in the form of a minimum wage with due respect for the practices of each Member State; emphasises that this instrument should be set up on the basis of legislation or convention, in accordance with national practices, with due respect for the role of the social partners; believes that these wage floors should represent at least 60 % of the average national wage; calls on the Commission to consult the social partners with a view to introducing, where appropriate, a minimum wage in some border areas associated with highly mobile workers and in particular in the road transport sector;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 655 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Supports the development of unemployment benefit arrangements as a mechanism for absorbing asymmetric social shocks withinProposes that the Commission and the Member States give further thought to establishing European unemployment insurance for the euro area;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 683 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to propose an appropriate legislative vehicle providing that companies haventerprises to assume a duty of care for which they may be held liable, in respect of both their subsidiaries and their subcontractooutsourcers operating in third countries, in order to prevent the risk of violations of human rights, corruption, severe physical injury or environmental damage and the violation of ILO Conventions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 693 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers that Directive 96/71/EC and the rules coordinating social security systems must be revised before any trade agreement including provisions relating to 'Mode 4' can be concluded;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for all ILO core labour standards to be a compulsory element of EU trade agreements such as TiSA from the outsetratified by the TiSA signatories; expects the European Union to play a leading role in reaching this objective;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls the essential role played by the services sector in the creation of skilled jobs in the European Union;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that the signing of a balanced agreement would create strong potential for growth and for the creation of new skilled jobs;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Stresses that the opportunities represented by TiSA for the internationalisation of European companies must be accompanied by genuine policies to help workers adapt to the new environment; underlines that the European Union has put financing mechanisms in place that could accompany these steps, such as the European Social Fund;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls furthermore, in negotiations on international trade in services, for mandatory working conditions to be secured in accordance with the respective laws on labour and social affairs, and for mandatory conclusion of collective agreements to be provided for, as well as a ban on the dismantling of workers’ rights and social standards when services are liberalisedUrges the Commission to pursue the social objective that it set for itself during TiSA negotiations in the form of the ‘labour clause’; recalls that the provisions of social and employment legislation at both European and national levels, as well as collective agreements, must be guaranteed under TiSA;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the right of the State to organise and regulate the provision of services, taking account of social and environmental criteria as well as the public interest, must be retained in full, and calls for services of general interest to be excluded from the agreement, irrespective of whether they are provided privately or publicly, as well as services of general economic interest, such as social services and social security systems, to be excluded from TiSA negotiations;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Rejects negotiations on the further liberalisation of services provided across EU borders so long as no EU-wide cooperation exists to maintain working conditions in accordance with the respective laws on labour and social affairs and collective agreements;deleted
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers furthermoreRecalls that the mobility of highly qualified workers could be advantageous not only for European companies, but also for European workers; insists, however, that the EU- wide posting of workers should not be regulated in trade agreements; stresses the importance of defining the precise criteria for providing a service under TiSA, such as the limited duration of the service and the anticipated level of competences, and of ensuring that these elements are clearly set out in the service contract;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls that the clauses of TiSA relating to the transport sector should not harm European workers in that sector; urges the Commission to establish clear restrictions on cabotage in order to prevent social dumping;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Expects the agreement to include a clause makCalls on the Commission to be proactive ing it possible to revise the liberalisation of services, particularly in the event of infringements of labour and social standardss negotiations, with a view to ensuring that a mechanism for the settling of disputes between signatory states is established so that proportionate penalties may be imposed on stakeholders who fail to uphold the social clauses of TiSA;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the immediate publication of all documents relevant to TiSA, and urges that the European social partners be permitted to participate transparently in the negotiating processHighlights the efforts made by the Commission to make the negotiations as transparent as possible; stresses the importance of involving civil society and the social partners in the development of the European Union’s position; calls on the Commission to continue in this direction.
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that equal access to affordable childcare andis of key importance in maintaining a work-life balance that will prevent women from being obliged to work on a part-time or half-time basis or to give up working altogether and that access to free, high-quality education is central to securing equal opportunities and breaking poverty cycles;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 29 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that gender equality in education implies that girls and boys, women and men, are afforded the same chances and treatment in access, process and outcome for high-quality education; points out that, although women make up 60% of all graduates in the EU, unemployment remains higher among women than among men; stresses, therefore, the need for sustainable responses that make gender equality a central consideration in careers guidance policies and policies to safeguard jobs and boost growth;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 40 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that gender mainstreaming at all levels of the education system is needed, including assessing the implications for girls and boys, women and men of any planned action and the need to let the concerns and experiences of all, form the design, implementation and evaluation of poland stresses the need to combat stereotypes surrounding technical subjects, which narrow girls’ career choicies;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 70 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. AffirmsPoints out that, in comparison to girls, boys are almost twice as likely to leave school with low or no qualifications but that socio-economic background and status seem to be a stronger predictor of educational achievement than gender alone.and accordingly calls for appropriate educational support to be provided in order to redress this imbalance;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 73 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of lifelong learning in providing fresh opportunities for adults who were obliged to leave school early or whose initial educational choices did not allow them to realise their potential or their ambitions;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 74 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee access to professional training programmes for young people and adults, and to promote those programmes; points to the important role played by the European Social Fund in helping people into employment by financing training policies, and calls on Member States and local authorities to encourage use of the fund;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 76 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points out that the 2008 crisis put a brake on women’s progression on and access to the labour market, where they are losing out to men with the same qualifications; calls on the Commission to take steps to ensure career equality and thus prevent women from experiencing slower career progression and falling into poverty; calls, with a view to increasing the number of women in all areas of the labour market and ensuring equal opportunities, for special support measures that will allow women to combine work and training and at the same time share family responsibilities with their spouses;
2015/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 1 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A (new)
A. whereas rural areas represent more than 77 % of EU territory and whereas many jobs in those areas are linked to agriculture and the agro-food industry;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B (new)
B. whereas, taken together, agriculture and the agro-food industry account for 6 % of the GDP of the EU, 15 million businesses and 46 million jobs;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the centrality of agriculture to social cohesion owing to its role in economic growth and diversification, and in fixing populations in rural areas; stresses the need to strengthen the CAP budget and to ensure social fairness in its implementationimportance of the CAP, which should make it possible for farmers to conduct business in such a way as to guarantee that they and their employees can have decent living conditions and good future prospects;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of territorial cohesion in the EU, which should be guaranteed by economic development policies that are adapted to the challenges facing rural areas;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports an integrated approach between the CAP’s second pillar and other EU funds such as the European Social Fund; recalls that synergy between the various European funds is one of the aims of the Union's regional policy; underlines the importance of involving local and regional administrations in the management and design of rural policies and that those administrations should be better prepared to deal with the issues associated with European funds; recalls that direct financial support to farmers cannot be financed by the European Social Fund, but that the latter can be mobilised to support training and adaptation to change in farming and the rural economy;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports an integrated approach betweeapproach which simultaneously draws on the CAP’s second pillar and other EU funds such as the European Social Fund; underlines the importance of involving local and regional administrations in the management and design of rural policies; calls on Member States to ensure that local and regional administrations do not create additional administrative burdens in the course of their work;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the strong market orientation of the EU’s agricultural polStresses that competition to offer the lowest pricies and its negative effect on rural incomes and employment, as evidenced by the liberalisation of the dairy sector; condemns the negative impact on agricultural labour of free trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnershipdestroys jobs in rural areas; calls on the Commission and Member States to take strong measures to guarantee prices which take due account of the work done by producers in order to guarantee them and their employees a decent standard of living;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on each Member State, in a new context whose salient features include the Russian embargo, the decline in demand, the abolition of milk quotas, the collapse of prices, increased production costs, increased competition and environmental challenges, to consider how the competitiveness of their farming can be improved so that the sector can create jobs and generate added value which is shared equitably throughout agriculture and the agro-food industry; stresses the importance, in this connection, of maintaining farms on the land, recognising their multifunctional character, which enables them, over and above their prime function of producing agricultural raw materials, to perform several other important functions, such as preserving the environment and contributing to the vitality of rural areas and the balance of regional development;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses that European farming is currently facing an unprecedented crisis, which is impoverishing farmers, creating risks of bankruptcy and leading to rising numbers of suicides; calls on the Commission to assess the social impact of this crisis, particularly in terms of job losses, especially in rural areas;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls on the Commission, in its trade negotiations with third countries, to take into account the impact that they may have on employment, particularly in rural areas;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the introduction of social conditionality in the CAP’s first pillarretention, as part of the CAP, of a strong first pillar with an economic function, capable of helping farmers make their farms into profitable and prosperous businesses, which can create jobs both directly and indirectly throughout agriculture and the agro-food industry; recalls, in this context, that one job created in agriculture results in the creation of seven jobs elsewhere;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a stronger role for social partnersRecommends that the social partners, alongside the national management authorities, play a stronger role in the development and implementation of agriculturalrural development policy in order to create quality jobs, ensure adequate health and safety conditions and foster the social integration of rural workers, in particular migrant for all workers;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of training, including training through apprenticeships, and skill formation for farmers and agricultural workers, particularly for young people entering the workforce and in order to be able to adapt to changes in agriculture and food production, so that they are able to adapt to changes occurring on the market and can better match their skills and qualifications to the needs and challenges of the agricultural and agri-food sector, including through improving their technical and digital skills, all while guaranteeing sufficient and high-quality food production in the context of global demographic growth;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Insists on the importance of ultra-fast broadband coverage for establishing businesses and creating jobs in rural areas;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the Member States to promote the ERASMUS+ programme among young farmers in training, including its apprenticeship component, in order to encourage them to acquire new technical and linguistic skills abroad;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Encourages the Member States to facilitate and guarantee access for rural areas to new information and communication technologies so that agricultural holdings can modernise their production methods, and so that farmers and agricultural workers can benefit from online training programmes throughout their career;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that improving access to land through instruments such as public land banks is key to agricultural employmentRecalls that the area of agricultural land is diminishing each year in Europe; stresses that preserving the area under cultivation is vital to preserving jobs in rural areas; notes that in the EU, only 6% of farmers are aged under 35 and that over 4 million are aged over 65; recalls the essential nature of measures enabling generational turnover and the setting up of young farmers by providing them with access to multi-disciplinary training so that young farmers are able to carry out a variety of activities simultaneously or successively in the course of a year and to combine revenues;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls that the average European farmer holds a mere 12 hectares of land and that 70% of agricultural holdings have a surface area below five hectares; notes that due to their size and structure, agricultural holdings cannot always afford to take on full-time employees or highly qualified workers; encourages the Commission and the Member States therefore to put in place measures to encourage employer groups;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. UrgNotes that, in rural areas, the gender pay gap in rural areas be addressed in order to improve women’s labour conditions and access to lans over 10% higher than elsewhere; urges that the gender gap in rural areas be addressed;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the defence of the right to public services in rural areas against current neo-liberal poEncourages the Member States to guarantee a good level of access to public services in rural areas, such as schools and healthcare facilicties; supports the development of minimum income schemes to ensure social cohesion, given the high rate of poverty and social exclusion in rural areas, in order to put an end to the problem of depopulation in rural areas and to encourage people living in rural areas to stay there and settle.
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that protecting the right to public services in rural areas requires innovative solutions, such as multimodal platforms, which facilitate rapid and effective access to services for rural populations.
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the absence of a more recognisable branding for CLLD and ITI and encourages the Commission and the Member States to make both tools as visible and understandable as possible for their users, while avoiding any additional bureaucratic burden and making further efforts in simplifying rules and procedures;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to create channels of communication with Member States and local agents and points out that CLLD and ITI will only achieve success with the commitment and ownership of all the stakeholders involved; calls on the Commission to establish a coordination unit for effective implementation of CLLD and ITI;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the potential of the bottom-up approach of CLLD in creating job opportunities and encouraging sustainable rural development, and would welcomes the inclusion of urban areas in this mechanism;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission, in view of the limited use of the European Social Fund within the method in question andfact that only 13 Member States has set- up CLLD funding schemes for the European Social Fund and given the absence of a centralised managing authority in most Member States, to use the mid-term review of the MFF to address the difficulties that have already been identified in the application of the instruments and to find sustainable solutions;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. having regard to the importance of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) and of its continued existence at a time when the social crisis is affecting more and more Europeans;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Member States to facilitate the access of anti-poverty associations to European financing from the FEAD without adding administrative burdens for these associations, which are often understaffed;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold backemployment policies must support the digital revolution , it is possible toand shape its course;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that territorial, employment and social policy need to keep pace with the digitalisation of society;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placefor changes to basic and continuous training and further educationre emerging; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring course content up to date and, develop skills strategies and update the skills required to use, and to create, new services;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that further efforts are needed to overhaulreview copyright law and that any revised provisions should apply to allonly where it is strictly necessary, while taking into account the convergence of media;
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 96 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on Member States to adjust their education systems in response to these new labour market requirements and to promote the acquisition of digital skills;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the financing of audiovisual content relies for a significant part on the principle of territoriality of rights, which allowed a strong cultural diversity within the European production.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 102 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Encourages the Member States to develop the digital skills of teachers as part of their training;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Underlines that "premium access" through the presale of rights is one of the core conditions for financing audiovisual content, as it allows a return on investment and new resources to finance future audiovisual content;
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 110 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Underlines that audiovisual content may have different market value from a Member State to another, depending on the characteristics of the national market, and requires targeted and specific promotion campaign to get the content to its public;
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 112 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Calls the Member States to extend the scope of the quotation exception, without prejudice to the authors' moral rights, to short audiovisual quotations for non- advertisement and non-political uses, provided that the work used is clearly credited, that the quotation does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not prejudice the legitimate interests of the authors;
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 114 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Calls for further dialogue between the rightholders, the online platforms and the creators relying on these platforms in order to achieve a mutually beneficial cooperation, where copyrights are protected while allowing and encouraging innovative ways of creating;
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 127 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the digitalisation-driven trend towards more flexible working practices may also give rise to precarious forms of employment to which current standards as regards social security, working time, working location, worker participation and employment protection no longer apply; calls for self-employed persons with quasi-employee status to be placed on an equal footing with employed persons under employment lawEmphasises that digitalisation represents an opportunity to move towards a new way of organising working time enabling a better work/life balance;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to set the basis for mutual recognition of the digital skills developed by European citizens through the education system or through training programs.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 150 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the sharing economy requires a rethinking of social relations in the working world;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses that Member States need to adjust their labour legislation to the digital economy, and to the sharing economy in particular;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls the Commission and the Member States to set up a European certificate or grading system to establish a common assessment of the digital skills developed by European citizens, following the example of the European common framework of reference for language learning and teaching.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 160 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Underlines the importance of proper training for teachers on digital skills, on the way to teach these skills efficiently to students, and on how to use these skills to support the learning process in general.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 165 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Underline the importance of enhancing the portability within the European Union of online services of legally acquired and legally made available content, whilst fully respecting copyrights and the interests of right- holders.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 169 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Stresses that cross-border access to legally made available audiovisual content should not hinder its financing process and subsequently the European cultural diversity.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 174 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Underlines that the legal audiovisual online offer should be furthermore developed in order to enhance the accessibility to a wide and diverse content for the consumers, with various language and subtitle options.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 177 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Calls the Member States to optimise the media chronology, in order to accelerate the availability of audiovisual content for the consumers, while maintaining a sustainable first and second window of diffusion.
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 181 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the social partners to suggest ways of enhancadapting social security for self- employed persons in need of protection, in order to safeguard the effectiveness of existing national systems.to this new way of working, particularly in regard to self-employed workers in the context of the sharing economy;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Advocates that fostering an intercultural and interfaith approach in the educational field is needed in order to address and promote multiculturalism, integrationintegration, cultural diversity and social cohesion;
2015/10/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 99 #

2015/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Emphasises the role and importance of the Erasmus+ programme in fostering a European awareness among young people and creating a culture of intercultural dialogue by facilitating their mobility, as well as increasing their employability;
2015/10/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 198 #

2015/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Recalls the role played by the LUX Prize in rewarding European films celebrating European identity or European cultural diversity;
2015/10/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 114 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes that many important fields of action are identified in the EU OSH strategic framework; stresses, in this context, that more concrete legislative measures should be included in the framework, following the 2016-review;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to make clear in their national strategies the OSH measures with which employees and employers must comply; calls on the Member States to adapt employee information obligations to the structure of the company concerned;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that ensuring a level playing- field across the EU and eliminating unfair competition and social dumping is crucial; stresses that labour inspectorates play a key role in enforcing workers’ rights to a safe and healthy working environment; calls for the adversarial procedure to be employed before any penalties are imposed; calls on the Member States to follow the ILO recommendation of a minimum of one labour inspector per 10 000 workers and to increase staffing and resources available to labour inspectorates;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the MemberStates to clarify and update the definitions of ‘accident at work’ and ‘occupational disease’ in order to make them more readily understandable for workers and employers;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Member States to implement as quickly as possible the directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that future trade agreements should take into account Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and on the Trade in Services Agreement, which remain valid for the future EU trade policy, in particular as far as the protectexclusion of public services from trade negotiations is concerned;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. StresseRecommends that the Domestic Advisory Groups, whose tasks include handling the infringements of social clauses ofwithin trade agreements must, ought to have sufficient financing and that they must consist ofensure a balanced representation of labour and business organisations from civil society;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the needncourages the Member States to increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, Member States’their labour inspectorates to allow for effective monitoring of compliance with labour standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need to increase efforts to unblock the reform of trade defence instruments.Emphasises that trade defence instruments make it possible to tackle all forms of unfair competition, including social dumping; as a result, calls on the Council and the Commission to unblock the reform of trade defence instruments, without weakening them, to make them speedier, more effective and more accessible for SMEs;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A. whereas career equality for men and women would help resolve the problem of women faced with impoverishment being far more vulnerable;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly deploresTakes note of the fact that the proposed revision of the directive on maternity leave was withdrawn just before the publication of the roadmap ‘New start to address thedue to the institutional deadlock into which it had sunk; challenges of work-life balance faced by working families’ and the fact that, in the context of this roadmap, the Commission does not at this stage intend to publish a final report on the implementation of the directive on parents on the Commission to return with an ambitious and realistic proposal that will effectively enable better reconciliation of family life and professional leavife;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Emphasises the need to provide workers who opt for parental leave with a decent income that allows them to make a genuine choice between the pursuit of their professional activities and raising their children;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for workers returning from parental leave to be able to benefit from training periods and from a period of protection against dismissal so that they can readjust to their job;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends the establishment of an office, a helpline and a website providing assistance and information on the rights of women workand responsibilities of workers and their employers in each Member State;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the promotion of organisations working toCalls upon social partners to ensure they are fully aware of the challenges of safeguarding the labour rights of women workemployed as domestic workers or carers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses how important it is to ensure the professionalisation of the sector so as to foster the creation of quality jobs and bring better working conditions and access to training and enable the validation and certification of skills acquired so as to promote career development;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends affording women domestic workers and carers the same status as the rest of the labour forceCalls upon the Member States to establish a dedicated legal framework in order to set out the rights and responsibilities of those concerned; asks that the specific details of the working contract be taken into account accordingly, as well as the fact that many employers are private individuals who may be unfamiliar with legal protocols;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Encourages businesses to establish lasting links and partnerships with educational establishments in order to facilitate entry to the business world for their students and ensure skills taught are constantly better matched to the real needs of the working world;
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 29 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. States that while for students traineeships are a learning opportunity, businesses shall perform their role of mentoring and training and be careful not to view these traineeships as a rich source of cheap labour;
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 36 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the importance of addressing skills shortages and mismatches by facilitating the mobility of learners in VET, through a better use of tools such as the European Qualifications Framework, the European Skills Passport, the Youth Guarantee and the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training, and, more specifically, through the new Erasmus+ programme which encourages youth mobility and works towards skills and qualifications being recognised both by education and training systems and on the labour market;
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 57 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that skillsthe development of training through skills is one of the key elements of integrated employment and social policies;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Member States to incorporate new technologies in the learning process and to intensify ICT training at all levels of education, particularly with the aim of enriching primary education, and to intensify ICT training at all levels of education, including for teaching staff; stresses that familiarisation with ICT has to be backed up by digital skills training too in order to meet the needs of a digitised economy;
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 75 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages Member States to improve the learning of foreign languages, and particularly European ones, as geographic mobility seems to be the best weapon for finding employment and against youth unemployment;
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 79 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of short- and medium-term regional employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer co-operation between education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls the wealth of jobs, often ones that cannot be relocated elsewhere, to be found using traditional skills which, moreover, help stimulate local economies and are of cultural interest; encourages Member States therefore to draw young people’s attention to the advantages of these skills and jobs.
2015/08/04
Committee: CULT
Amendment 113 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the key role of enterprises, including SMEs and micro-enterprises, in job creation; stresses the need to provide education for entrepreneurship on every level, including pre-school education, by including in curricula the development in a safe environment (through games, simulations and youth projects) of the practicvocational skills needed in starting and managing businesses;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the exchange of good practices in vocational education and the development of training through skills enabling access to the labour market to be enhanced;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Warns Member States against dispersion in the types of contract offered to young people; calls for thinking along these lines in order to increase effectiveness;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls that certain programmes of the European Union, such as Erasmus +, afford opportunities for young people to develop new skills in other Member States; recalls that this European mobility in training is a significant asset for the employability of young people;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that the effective implementation of the Youth Guarantee can help to improve the employability of young people by overcoming educational deficits and by providing skills relevant to the market needs and can offer valuable work experience that can facilitate the establishment of successful businesses; recalls the urgent need to establish youth guarantees in Member States with the aid of the European Social Fund;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that skills development should also be considered as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for people from disadvantaged groups, in particular for children and young people from families affected by poverty, the long-term unemployed, including second-generation unemployed, immigrants and, people with disabilities and women, who have been excluded from the world of work in shocking numbers as a result of the crisis; stresses that prevention as well as support and counselling at an early stage are of the outmost importance, because although enabling people who are at a disadvantage to develop skills and to enter the labour market requires time and resources it is also socially and economically profitable;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2 Calls for the swift ratification by Korea ofCommission to continue its work with Korea to enable that country to ratify all fundamental ILO conventions that it has not yet ratified;
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of dialogue between the Commission, civil society, social partners and businesses with a view to pursuing the implementation of the commitments set out in the agreement.
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Points out that digitalisation has a substantial impact on the labour market by modifying job dynamism, creating new job opportunities and more flexible working conditions such as telecommuting or teleworking which could serve as a an effective tool for better reconciliation of professional and domestic duties for both women and men;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Points out that only 20% of 2.7 million people working in the ICT sector are women, they are underrepresented at all levels in the ICT sector, especially in decision-making positions;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b. Highlights the fact that the Commission's estimations show that allowing more women to enter the digital jobs market can create an annual € 9 billion GDP boost in the EU area;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c. Stresses the importance of improving digital skills and IT-literacy among women and boosting their inclusion into ICT, which is one of the highest paying sectors, which could contribute to women's financial empowerment and independence resulting in the reduction of the total gender wage gap and future pension gap;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the fact that the ICT sector is characterised by both vertical and horizontal segregation which is even higher that the other sectors, as well as a gap between women's educational qualifications and their position in the ICT sector; whereas the majority (54 per cent) of women employed in ICT sector occupy lower paid and lower skill-level positions and only a small minority of them (8 per cent) are in the high skill software engineer positions; whereas women are also underrepresented in the decision-making within this sector with only 19,2 per cent of ICT sector workers having female bosses compared to 45,2 per cent of non-ICT sector workers;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights the fact that some Member States (Germany, Spain, Sweden) initiated policies to encourage a positive gender balance within Europe's ICT professions, and these policies are primarily aimed at promoting ICT-related studies and career paths for girls and women from an early age;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the gender pay and career development gap continues for self- employed women and women working in the ICT sector; stresses that the principle of equal pay for equal work in the same workplace to ensure just and fair wages is being challenged; reiterates that inequalities of this kind should not be allowed to take root in these new sectors and that they should on the contrary be key sectors as regards equal pay and career development;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the opportunity for a better work-life balance for women in the digital age; emphasises the risks posed by potential demand for a constant accessibility of employees (e.g. burnout); advocates, therefore, a ‘right to log off’ for workerstresses therefore the need for respecting working time arrangements under flexible hours employment contracts in order to maintain the boundaries of working time as defined by the labour law in the individual Member States;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the demand for new skills, particularly in the ICT field, needs to be tackled through training as well as through further education and lifelong learning, in the interests of promoting digital literacy and tackling the existing gender gap in order to enlarge the pool of highly qualified candidates; recalls that the European Social Fund may participate in funding such training courses.
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Takes the view that women over 55 are more likely to have depreciated e-skills due to the lack of life-long learning and that digitalization constitutes an important barrier for older job seekers with limited e-skills, calls on the Commission and the Member States to support life-long learning as well as training and schemes which prepare for a better adaptation or a potential change of career path according to the growing demand for e-skills in many different sectors with a special regard to women over 55 in order to safeguard them from the exclusion from the labour market;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to use existing EU-level funding resources, in particular the European Social Fund, to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low-income young people, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to do all they can to raise awareness among young people of the opportunities for setting up businesses, by providing appropriate training;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for public employment services to be more proactive in providing assistance and advice to businesses, and to young entrepreneurs in particular;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to do everything possible to facilitate business initiatives by young people so as not to discourage their projects; emphasizes the responsibility of Member States to simplify the administrative formalities imposed on companies, possibly hindering creativity;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2015/2006(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to use the European Fund for Strategic Investment, and in particular the European Social Fund, to support entrepreneurship education at national and local level;
2015/05/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 204 #

2015/2006(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to promote the development of entrepreneurship- friendly environments and training which will facilitate young people’s start-ups and enable quick recovery in the event of dropping out of school or from initial failures;
2015/05/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 212 #

2015/2006(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to make use of the EU Structural Funds, in particular the European Social Fund, in order to promote entrepreneurship education and training at national, regional and local level;
2015/05/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 6 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to address the budgetary constraints faced by Member States at the initial stage of the programming period and, taking into account the urgent need to address youth unemployment and the specific features of the YEI, it is appropriate to lay down provisions in order to complement Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, with a view to increase the level of the initial pre-financing paid to operational programmes supported by the YEI in 2015. To ensure that Member States have sufficient means to provide payments to beneficiaries responsible for the implementation of operations that target youth unemployment, an additional initial pre-financing amount from the specific allocation for the YEI should be paid in 2015 for operational programmes supported by the YEI, in order to complement the pre-financing amounts paid in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. In order to enable a prompt implementation of the operational programmes supported by the YEI, the Commission should commit itself to pay the pre-financing amount to the Member States immediately after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) To ensure that the additional initial pre- financing amount is used for the immediate implementation of the YEI, it should be foreseen that this amount is reimbursed to the Commission, if the Union contribution from the YEI does not amount to an adequate level in interim payment applications submitted to the Commission 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. This measure is a safeguard to ensure that eligible Member States set up the required structures to promptly implement the YEI. Member State action is urgently needed to deliver on the YEI and combat alarming levels of youth unemployment.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that some labour reforms have introduced new contractual formulas that, according to the Commission, have increased precariousness in the labour markets; of particular concern are some Member States whose rates of temporary employment are over 90 % for new contracts, which particularly affects young people and women and which, according to the OECD1, is one of the direct causes of increasing inequality; calls on the Member States to set up synergies between national policies and the European cohesion policy in order to reinforce the effect on these priority groups; __________________ 1 OECD report ‘In it together: Why less inequality benefits all’, 21 May 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of the IMF2 report on the causes and consequences of inequality, which states that the increase in the income gap is negatively affecting economic growth and the potential for job creation; calls for immediate and effective action on labour taxation, labour markets and redistributive policies to facilitate greater and upward economic and social convergence; __________________ 2 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that high rates in long-term unemployment in the EU, especially in some Member States, are resulting in an increasing number of workers losing their benefits before finding a new job; considers it regrettable that manysome Member States have limited access to such benefits or have reduced the amount available and/or the eligibility period for them; considers it important to maintain a balance between adequate social protection and adequate incentives for active job searching; calls for a specific study on such incentives at EU level, and calls on the Member States to guarantee minimum income schemes to avoid pockets of social exclusion and ensure a minimum income to families;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines the fact that, according to an IMF report3, the progressivity of tax systems has been weakened in recent years, resulting in increasing inequality; considers that the tax wedge has been much higher for low-wage workers and SMEs with higher effective tax rates; points out the importance of reducing taxes for labour and enterprises in pursuit of more redistributive formshe burdens on enterprises in order to open up their employment potential; insists that these must be accompanied by measures to encourage enterprises to employ people experiencing the greatest problems in the job market; __________________ 3 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 448 #

2014/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls for the headquarters of the European Medicines Agency, currently in London, to be moved to another Member State;
2016/11/09
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 5 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that in order to contribute efficiently to combating the high levels of youth unemployment, EU cohesion policy needs to be fully in line with the Europe 2020 strategy, and in particular the headline targets for education of reducing school drop-out rates to below 10 % and increasing the share of young people with a third-level degree or diploma to at least 40 %, and with the benchmark for an average of at least 15 % of adults to participate in lifelong learning, thereby recognising the validation of skills and acquired experience;
2015/01/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 24 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Youth Guarantee Scheme aEmployment Initiative introduced to enhance the Youth Guarantee Scheme in regions with youth unemployment of over 25%, and points out that this is an efficient means of reducing youth unemployment; calls on Member States to establish strong partnerships with stakeholders and to make full use of the European Social Fund and other structural funds when implementing the scheme and creating an infrastructure therefor;
2015/01/29
Committee: CULT
Amendment 68 #

2014/2241(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Supports the development of non- motorised travel routes (for walking, horse-riding or cycling), which facilitate sustainable tourism and create opportunities to discover the diversity of Europe’s regions;
2015/05/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 91 #

2014/2241(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls the important place of sporting activities in making Europe’s regions attractive to tourists; stresses that this dimension must be taken into account in strategies to promote tourism in Europe;
2015/05/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 21 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the demand for lower qualified workers is falling while the demand for highly qualified workers is increasing considerably; this shift in the EU labour market requires action to be taken on workers’ skills and initial and vocational training;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the mobility of European workers enhances their employability and improves competitiveness in the EU labour market;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. recalls the importance of making employment law more comprehensible for workers and employers, of eliminating barriers to employment and of promoting legal security for companies and employees;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of human development, career flexibility and self- responsibility; recalls in this respect that professional mobility is an essential factor and that investment is needed to actively support employability and prevent skills depletion among the unemployed; emphasises that such measures should be combined with reforms in pension and social welfare systems that encourage more people to work;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of more integrated partnerships between universities, higher education establishments, businesses and authorities with a view to estimating labour needs for the future, as well as fostering cooperation between Member States in this regard;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. recalls that in order to achieve these targets, the Member States must make more efficient use of the European Social Fund, which is the main EU financial instrument for professional integration and adaptation;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. calls for the encouragement of the study and use of foreign languages in order to increase mobility;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
i a) to ensure that steps are taken to promote the development of new professional skills to meet the new labour market needs that will arise from the TTIP;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
i b) to ensure the promotion of the modernisation of training systems, to enable them to provide the new skills required by the TTIP in order to improve access to the labour market and produce better qualified workers;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi
vi) to ensure that the specific challenges faced by SMEs are fully taken into account; it should be recalled that 99 % of European companies are SMEs and that they are responsible for 85 % of net job creation in the EU. It should be stressed that they would be the first to benefit from an open market that would help them to become more competitive by removing unhelpful barriers and creating an economic framework that encourages exports.
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi – point a (new)
a) to study the impact of the TTIP on SMEs and also non-exporting microenterprises active in the local market, for which this agreement will create fiercer competition.
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
x a) ensure that the exchange conditions are subject to strict reciprocity in order to strengthen EU industrial fabric, protect SMEs, create jobs and prevent all unfair competition, in particular as regards social standards
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the European Social Fund with the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative have to be correctly and fully used to finance sustainable projects in order to fight unemployment and more particularly youth unemployment
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the unequal division of family responsibilities is at the root of the unequal position of women in the labour market; stresses that reconciliation of work and home duties is a key condition for gender equality, which should be promoted by investment in care infrastructure and encouragement of men’s participation in domestic labour by means of European legislation on parental and paternity leave and flexible working time arrangements;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the feminisation of poverty is the result of factors including women’s career breaks, gender inequalities in career progression, the gender pay gap, the pension gap and poverty in households headed by single mothers, and that the reduction of poverty levels by 20 million by 2020 can be achieved by anti-poverty policies that are grounded in gender mainstreaming; ;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for transparency and greater gender balance based on identical and objective criteria in recruitment for decision-making positions;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the Commission’s commitment on cutting red tape and better regulation; believes that cutting red tape should deliver proportionate, evidence-based protection for workers, while ensuring thatbetter regulation that is clearer, more effective and with less red tape would enable businesses canto grow, to create jobs and to boost competitiveness; notes that deregulation and better regulation are not mutually exclusive, without calling into question a good level of protection for workers;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s indication that the maternity leave directive should be considered for withdrawal;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Commission is considering withdrawing the maternity leave directive; calls on the Commission to draw up a new proposal, which should take account of social developments and result in an ambitious directive which would encourage the rate of employment among women and the birth rate in Europe;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2149(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the European institutions and the Member States to promote and support soft travel (walking, horse-riding and cycling tours) as a way of opening up new opportunities for cultural and nature- based tourism;
2015/03/31
Committee: CULT
Amendment 95 #

2014/2149(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the importance for European tourism of Unesco-designated tangible or intangible cultural heritage and natural heritage;
2015/03/31
Committee: CULT
Amendment 33 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E a (new)
E a. Whereas the Commission has to establish trust with economic actors, support enterprise development and in particular focus on supporting SME development, with the aim to promote economic growth and to support employment in Europe;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Is concerned that the Commission’s strategy of restoring EU competitiveness through an excessive adjustment of unit labour costs via salary reductions has sharply eroded the purchasing power of many EU workers, lowered household incomes and depressed internal demand, further fuelling unemployment and social exclusion, particularly in those countries hit hardest by the crisis; points out that a cross-sectoral policy for restoring competitiveness must also contemplate strategies focusing on other production costs, price developments and profit margins, and on boosting innovation and excellence;deleted
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Stresses that the Commission's strategy of restoring EU competitiveness should focus on a cross-sectorial policy in order to boost innovation and excellence;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 25
25. Welcomes those CSRs aimed at increasing the adequacy and coverage of minimum income schemes and social protection, and the number of CSRs relating to labour market inclusion policies; takes the view, however, that the uneven and fragile growth expected by the Commission in 2014 and 2015 will not by itself be able to tackle the severe impact that austerity measures and the crisis have had on the fight against poverty and social exclusion and on the achievement of the Europe 2020 goals; demands that the Member States propose specific, targeted measures within their NRPs with a view to tackling poverty, especially child poverty;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Platform, as set out in Article 1 (1), shall contribute to better enforcement of EU and national law, to the reduction of undeclared work and to the emergence of formal jobs, hence avoiding. It shall thus help to embed the Europe 2020 strategy and its employment objectives, providing a more effective European framework for employment and workplace health and safety. Avoiding thereby the deterioration of quality of work, and toit shall promote integration in the labour market and social inclusion by:
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 451 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 5
(5) The Commission shall inform regularly the European Parliament and the Council about the activities of the Platform. After each meeting of the Platform, the Commission shall, within a reasonable time, forward a report on the discussions and the decisions taken to the European Parliament and the Council.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1
The Platform shall work, as appropriate, in cooperation with other relevant Union level expert groups and committees, whose work has a link with undeclared work, in particular the Senior Labour Inspectors Committee (SLIC), the Expert Committee on Posting of Workers, the Administrative Commission for Social Security Coordination, the Employment Committee (EMCO), the Social Protection Committee (SPC) and the Working Group on Administrative Cooperation in the field of Taxation. Joint meetings may also be organisedIn the interests of more efficient working and enhanced impact, joint meetings shall be organised, the minutes of which shall be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council within a reasonable time.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) to encourage Member States to remove all obstacles to that mobility in their national laws;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the development of an appropriate framework for cooperation and clearance within the Union on apprenticeships and traineeships, and for unification of the related procedures, in accordance with this Regulation;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for the purpose of publication, including on the EURES portal, the collection and validation of up-to-date information on EURES Partners operating from its national territory, their activities and the scope of the support services they provide to workers and employers;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the rules applicable to workers, including recruitment rules, and the individual categories of employment contracts;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the rules applicable on unemployment insurance;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The National Coordination Office ensures that information is complete and up to date and written in a simple, comprehensible style.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universitiehigher education institutions, chambers of commerce and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Each Member State ensures that its National Coordination Office gets the staff and oall ther resources necessary to carry out its tasks as defined under this Regulation.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up a system to authorise EURES Partners to participate in the EURES network, monitor their activities and their compliance with national and European Union laws when applying this Regulation. This system shall be transparent, proportionate and respect the principles of equal treatment for applicant organisations and due process of law.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The minimum common criteria are without prejudice to the application by a Member State of additional criteria or requirements deemed necessary by the Member State for the purpose of a correct application of the rules applicable to the activities of employment services and the effective management of labour market policies on its national territory. To ensure transparency such, the European Coordination Office shall be notified of such additional criteria and requirements, which are an integral part of the system referred to in paragraph 1.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 486 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The public employment services shall ensure that the EURES portal is linked to, clearly visible and intuitively searchable through all the job search portals they manage, be them at central, regional or local level.(Does not affect the English version.)
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 514 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The public employment services shall ensure that workers using their services, by making available job applications and/or CVs with them, canare informed that they may choose to have those employment services assist those workers with their registration on the EURES portal, using the national hub referred to in Article 15(5).
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 542 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Information on such support and on any cost involved shall be supplied in a clear and precise manner to both employers and workers.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 590 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to provide information on the specific rules applicable when employing those workers and with regard to the various types of employment contract;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 624 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation from Article 18(5), EURES Partners may offer the assistance referred to in paragraph 1 to workers against a fee. If this is the case, workers shall be informed immediately of the cost of the service.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 629 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure coordination between support services under this Regulation and services provided on social security and unemployment insurance by the competent authorities.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 638 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Upon request of workers, frontier workers and employers, the EURES Partners concerned shall provide general information on the rights related to social security and unemployment insurance and undertake to refer those requests for specific information to the competent authorities and, if applicable, other bodies supporting workers exercising their rights in the framework of the freedom of movement.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 663 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Member States shall undertake to remove from their national laws legal provisions designed to slow down or hinder the movement of workers within the European Union.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
-Aa. whereas equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the European Union, recognised in the Treaty on European Union and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas equality between women and men has a positive impact on productivity and economic growth, and greater female participation in the labour market has a host of social and economic benefits;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 40 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EU is currently facing the most significant economic and financial crisis since the Great Depression in the 1930s; whereas this crisis has been exacerbated by so-called austerity measures imposed on the Member States by the EU institutions within the framework of economic governance policies (Stability and Growth Pact, European Semester, Euro-Plus Pact, Budgetary Treaty) and ‘financial aid’ programmes;deleted
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the policies applied in the name of the crisis haves a particularly harsh impact on vulnerable people and particularly women, who feel the impact both directly – through loss of employment, wage, pension and benefit cuts, and loss of job security – and indirectly through budget cuts in public services and social care;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 111 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas an important role can be played by the media not just in disseminating stereotypes, degrading the image of women, and hypersexualising young girls, but also in overcoming gender stereotypes, promoting the participation of women in decision- making and promoting gender equality;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Member States and the Commission, using information and awareness campaigns, for example, to encourage women to participate in fields of activity that stereotypes term ‘masculine’, not least sciences and new technologies, the object being to make the most of the human capital to be found in European women and hence enable the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy and gender equality to be achieved to more fruitful effect;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 201 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly uUrges the Member States to increase theigether to seek, and to exchange, best practice with a view to opening up new sources of finance for investment in public services, particularly health servicystems, taking into account the difficulties relatinged to sexual and reproductive healththe crisis and the demographic challenges posed by population ageing while avoiding any lowering of the high standards and the requirements laid down in the relevant European models;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 215 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to increase their child support budgets in order to expand the public network ofPoints to the need for specific proposals making for better balance in terms of working, family, and personal life by encouraging men and women to share occupational, family, and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare are concerned; notes that more comprehensive day care, and nurseries and public services providing extracurricular activities for childreny facilities depend not only on the necessary public policies, but also on incentives to businesses to offer such solutions; urges (regional) chambers of commerce and industry, in addition, to facilitate networking of entrepreneurs, especially female entrepreneurs, with a view to working out solidarity-based joint approaches to work-life balance;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 245 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States, and especially media regulators, to consider the place accorded – in both quantitative and qualitative terms – to women in the media and television in particular, not least in order to avert insults to the dignity of women, avoid conveying gender stereotypes, and curb any tendency to hypersexualise little girls;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 251 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Points to the need to redouble efforts at European level to increase the representation of women in political spheres and in the European institutions, including the European Parliament; believes that women’s participation needs to be encouraged at national, regional, and municipal levels; points out that political parties have a key role to play;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 271 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that increasing poverty and marginalthe feminisation, owing to so-called austf poverity policies, havemight lead to an increase in female trafficking, sexual exploitation and forced prostitution and that there are signs that domestic violence is on the rise, as social tensions within families also increase, and that women now find themselves more economically dependent on their aggressorsreduce women to greater financial dependence, including those who have suffered domestic violence;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 293 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes with concern that – according to data from the Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action in the EU Member States: Violence against Women, Victim support (2012), from the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) – professional training and the sustainability of funding for public services, associations and NGOs providing services to women in situations of domestic violence are clearly being affected by the so-called austerity measures, threatening the continued existence of such services, and that this is a shameful step backwards in civilizational terms; recalls that tremendous inequality exists among the Member States in terms of access to support services, with secure and sufficient state funding existing in Denmark, the Netherlands and Austriaconsequences of the economic crisis;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 302 #

2013/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recommends that the Member States strengthen their free public health servicePoints out that violence against women is a major hindrance to gender equality; calls ion the area of support to women subjected to violence and that they increase the number of refuges and their capacity, with specialised assistance to women of different nationalities, in a range of languagesCommission to propose a comprehensive directive on the prevention and eradication of violence against women in all its forms, whether physical, sexual, or psychological; recommends that Member States provide better training to police, court, and social service personnel and improve cooperation among them to enable them to help women who have suffered violence;
2013/12/19
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 88 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises the need to collect detailed and reliable gender disaggregated statistics on what is the real situation of people with disabilities;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises that, during their training, health professionals and teachers need to be trained in and made aware of all types of disability, as some are little known despite their prevalence;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 133 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the necessity to protect women with disabilities living in care homes and mental hospitals from sexual assault and other forms of physical mistreatment to which they may be subjected, and points with concern to the lack of data on this alarming phenomenon; asks, therefore, the Member States to investigate how pervasive this problem is, collect the relevant data and take the appropriate measures to tackle it;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to facilitate access to education and the labour market for women with disabilities, as they should be encouraged to follow study courses and use new information and communication technologies, and supported and encouraged to enter the labour market, and highlights that particular talents, views and experiences can enrich working environments considerably;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 154 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Asks that through the use of positive measures and suitable funding, businesses be encouraged to employ them. Emphasises the desirability of mobilising the European Social Fund and national disability strategies in order to lessen the inequalities women with disabilities suffer from and to assist in their finding employment;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 166 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls for elderly women, often living alone and confronted with diseases that bring about disability, to receive special attention through the setting up of a prevention and assistance programme;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 168 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Insists that special attention be paid to people, often women, caring for people with disabilities and that their commitment be taken into account in accrediting their professional experience;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 4 #

2013/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to guarantee equal treatment and pay for men and women taking up these new roles;
2013/09/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 5 #

2013/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Member States, when they promote the plan, to stress the importance of gender balance;
2013/09/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 124 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the involvement of all relevant stakeholders, including training and education providers, individual employerregional and local authorities, public and private employment services, social partners, individual employers, training and education providers, third-sector organisations, and health and other authorities, is essential for the successful implementation of a variety of measures fostering youth employment and employability in an integrated fashion; emphasises that measures must be flexible so as to meet the continuously evolving needs on the labour market;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the decision of the EPSCO Council on 28 February 2013 to agree on a Council recommendation on implementing a Youth Guarantee; recommends extending eligibility to graduates aged under 30; stresses that the success of this measure will be highly dependent on other factors, e.g. the infrastructure and capacity of public and strengthened private employment services, the availability of student places, the provision of training and, apprenticeships, and the transferability and implementation of successful experiences from other Member States; stresses that the Youth Guarantee must be integrated within the broader framework of active labour market policies and monitored while ensuring high quality standards;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Member States to boost their support for enterprises, cooperatives, local and regional authorities and third- sector organisations wishing to participate in Youth Guarantee schemes in close cooperation with public and private employment services, including through tax incentives, subsidies for fixed employment costs, and the possibility of accessing funding for on-site training, which will support enterprises in providing high-quality employment and training offers, and will represent an investment in young people's potential in an effective and targeted way;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to draw up in cooperation with local and regional authorities as well as with other potential stakeholders, further specific outreach strategies targeted on NEETs, which should combine effective forms of intervention aimed at tackling early school- leaving and the reintegration of early school-leavers with strategies facilitating a smooth transition from education to work, and an increase in the employability of young people, together with the removal of the practical and logistical barriers faced by young people with more complex needs;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to support young entrepreneurs and self-employment among young people by simplify an access to financial resources available for starting up their own business and creating facilities and preferential conditions for starting up their own businesses, through, e.g., cutting red tape and introducing favourable tax policies;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that the Alliance for Apprenticeship should also support European and national, regional and local campaigns for changing perceptions of vocational education, and should organise a regular forum for discussions on the monitoring of the European apprenticeship strategy with all relevant European and national stakeholders; stresses that incentives should also be provided to facilitate funding for crossborder training activities enabling companies and social partner organisations to become involved in establishing dual education systems;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages the Member States to foster theregional and cross-border mobility of young workers by means of further progress towards the mutual recognition of qualifications and skills and enhanced coordination of national social security systems, especially as regards pension systems, as well as by continuing to invest substantially in language learning;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the need to introduce reforms to EURES with the aim of proactively matching jobseekers and job-changers to existing vacancies, and where necessary, to reform public employment services so as to better target their activities and approaches on young people; stresses that raising of awareness of EURES is needed so as to increase its visibility and availability, as a career advice system that supports students in becoming more aware of their aspirations and capabilities, as well as of existing job opportunities; Additionally, highlights a necessity of stronger coordination between EURES and other portals and services for citizens and business (i.e. Europe Direct information points or the European Enterprise Network for SMEs), in order to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Call on Member States to take all necessary actions, aside potential intensified mobility, to prevent the phenomena of brain drain through sustainable measures which assure that a good proportion of the highly-skilled labour forces will retain in individual countries;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2013/2044(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the currenteffects of the economic crisis hasve been aggravated by austerity measures that have led to cuts in national health budgets; whereas this has resulted in setbacks for the right to women’s health protection and had a serious impact on the most disadvantaged groups – children, the elderly, people with disabilities, migrants and ethnic minorities – as their access to health in general is now more difficult, given the increase in healthcare costs and the professional and social devaluation of health professionals;
2013/04/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2013/2044(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E
E. whereas health protection has important effects upon the quality, longevity, and dignity of human life;Does not affect English version – correction of typo in French.
2013/04/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2013/2044(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly rRecommends that budgetary cuts in public health sysMember Statems need to be counteracted and that there should, on the contrary, besupport the health and care services sector and increased investment in these services in order to meet the needs of the whole population, and in particular to tackle gender inequalities in health and to ensure equal access to health care for the most disadvantaged groups;
2013/04/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 27 #

2013/2044(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on Member States not to intensify women’s burden of caring by returning them to their traditional family role;
2013/04/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #

2013/2044(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Urges Member States to adopt policies that promote health and the prevention of disease through the guarantee of free, universal and quality health care, with particular attention to guaranteeing primary health care, preventive medicine, access to diagnoses, treatment and rehabilitation; calls for provision of the means required to combat the main public health problems facing women and guarantee the right to sexual and reproductive health, health services for women who are victims of violence, and health care for infants;
2013/04/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas maternal mortality remains a concern in some Member States and a challenge for European development policy;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas studies have shown that comprehensive sexuality education does increase the likelihood of responsible, safe and respectful behaviour upon first and subsequent sexual activity;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas young people are widely exposed, from an early age, to pornographic content, especially through access to the Internet whether at home or at school;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 64 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the sexualisation of little girls in the media is a phenomenon that affects the emotional development and the sex life of both women and men and helps to perpetuate gender stereotyping and various forms of discrimination and sexual violence;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 68 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the sharing of best practices among Member States offers a means of identifying optimal solutions and more effectively safeguarding the interests of all EU citizens;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the Member States to share their best practices and packages of measures in the field of sexual and reproductive health policy;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 122 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Member States to promote scientific research on male- and female- controlled methods of contraception, so as to facilitate the burden-sharing of contraceptive responsibility;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 155 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines that the sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents differ from those of adults; calls on the Member States to ensure that adolescents and vulnerable adults (disabled, illiterate, refugees, etc.) have access to user-friendly services where their concerns and rights to confidentiality and privacy are duly taken into account;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 159 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on Member States to ensure compulsory, age-appropriate and gender- sensitive sexuality and relationship education, provided in a mixed-sex setting, for all children and adolescents (both in and out of school);
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 170 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Emphasises in this regard that sexuality education is particularly necessary as young people have access, from an early age, to pornographic and degrading content, especially via the Internet; emphasises therefore that sexuality education must be part of a broader supportive approach to young people’s emotional development so as to enable them to form mutually respectful relationships with members of the opposite sex; encourages Member States to introduce campaigns directed at parents and at adults who work with young people, to raise their awareness about the harmful effects of pornography on adolescents;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 171 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Asks the Member States, too, to address the fundamental need for comprehensive sexuality education that includes the emotional aspects of relationships, given the phenomenon of sexualisation of little girls in audiovisual and digital content to which young people have access;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 172 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Asks Member States, in the context of sexuality education, to focus on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, by encouraging safe sexual behaviour and facilitating access to means of protection;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 175 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new)
Encourages Member States to strengthen policies for raising awareness about sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among all age groups;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 202 #

2013/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Highlights the fact that the epidemics suffered in certain developing countries which are partners of the EU, including the HIV epidemic, significantly impede development;
2013/07/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 3 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the right to live and work in another country of the Union is one of the Union’s fundamental freedoms guaranteed to European citizens by the Treaty on European Union;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas workers’ mobility and educational mobility contribute to a sense of European citizenship and involvement in democratic processeshelp to deepen people’s attachment to their European citizenship;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the economic and financial crisis has negatively affected the EU labour market, especially as regards employment rates and the possibility of moving freely and choosing employment according to one’s educational and professional qualifications, with women being one of the worst- affected groups;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas there are significant gender differences as regards workers’ mobility within the EU – men move for jobs or job transfers far more often than do women (44 % compared with 27 %), while women are more often makeobliged to take a career break in connection with a long-distance move in order to follow their partner;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 69 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Member States to make pay trends more transparent so as to avert continuing or widening pay gapsreduce pay gaps for work of equal value;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 77 #

2013/2009(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
(9a) Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage the use of teleworking in both private and public sector organisations, on the basis of fair pay and fair social conditions, to avoid the need for women to take career breaks in connection with their partners’ occupational mobility;
2013/01/29
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 103 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the equipment needed to provide the relevant port service in normal and safe conditions and theand the technical and financial capacity required to maintain thisat equipment at the appropriate level in order to provide the relevant port service continuously in normal and safe conditions;
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
This Chapter and the transitional provisions of Article 24 shall not apply to cargo handling services and, passenger services or mooring.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) access to social and tax advantages, particularly those relating to health, social protection and unemployment insurance;
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that fast- track judicial and/or administrative procedures, including where they deem it appropriate, conciliation procedures, for the enforcement of the obligations under Article 45 of the Treaty and Articles 1 to 10 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, are put in place and available to all workers and members of their families who consider they have suffered or are suffering from unjustified restrictions to their right to free movement or consider themselves wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment to them, even after the relationship in which the discrimination is alleged to have occurred has ended.
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure by any means which they consider effective that the citizens concerned are informed of their rights;
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 64 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that associations, organisations or other legal entities, which have, in accordance with the criteria laid down by their national law, a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions of this Directive are complied with, may engage, either on behalf of or in support of the worker and members of his/her family, with his/her express approval, in any judicial and/or administrative procedure provided for the enforcement of rights under Article 45 of the Treaty and Articles 1 to 10 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 65 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate a structure, a body or bodies for the promotion, analysis, monitoring and support of equal treatment of all workers or members of their families without discrimination, particularly on grounds of nationality, and make the necessary arrangements for functioning of such bodies. These bodies may form part of agencies at a national level with similar objectives but covering a wider range of discrimination grounds. In that case, the Member State shall ensure allocation of sufficient resources to the existing body for the performance of additional tasks in order to ensure that the performance of already existing tasks of these bodies will not suffer.
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
da. In all cases, a report shall be published each year in order to take stock of the work of the structure put in place and to formulate proposals.
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 73 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide clear, free, easily accessible, comprehensive and up- to-date information on the rights conferred by the Union law on free movement of workers. . This information should also be easily accessible through Your Europe and EURES.
2013/09/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 11 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A
A. whereas certain petitions have been deposited requesting that the establishment of the European Parliament in more than one place be discontinuedEuropean Parliament should no longer have three places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 14 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A a (new)
Aa. whereas the European Parliament has had its seat in Strasbourg since 1952, a situation confirmed by the Edinburgh European Council in 1992 and by the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, and not altered by the Lisbon Treaty;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 16 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A b (new)
Ab. whereas the real annual cost of retaining the Strasbourg seat in 2010 was EUR 51.5 million, i.e. 0.04 % of the annual budget of the European Union or 10 cents per citizen per year;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 18 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A c (new)
Ac. whereas the gross cost of holding plenary sessions in Strasbourg is EUR 7 445 000 per part-session, and whereas 80 % of these costs are fixed and would be incurred irrespective of where a given part-session is held (equipment, publications, translation, etc.);
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 20 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A d (new)
Ad. whereas mobility is an intrinsic aspect of the work of an MEP, requiring at least a large number of journeys between the European Parliament, the MEP’s Member State of origin and the constituency in which the MEP was elected;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 28 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph B a (new)
Ba. whereas there were historical reasons for the decision to hold part-sessions in Strasbourg, in particular the symbolic significance of that city and the need to have a multi-centre European Union;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 31 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph B b (new)
Bb. whereas, under the Treaties, the European Parliament has its seat in Strasbourg where the 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions are held;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 36 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructed despite the widespread interest in the issue amongst MEPs;deleted
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 37 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructed despite the widespread interest in the issue amongst MEPs;deleted
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 42 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructnot yet succeeded despite the widespread interest in the issue amongst MEPs;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 47 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C a (new)
Ca. whereas two judgments given by the Court of Justice of the European Union in 1997 and 2012 recalled that the TFEU locates the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg and whereas the conditions for the application of Protocol No 6 have been clarified;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 52 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C b (new)
Cb. whereas all the countries which have joined the European Union have ratified Protocol No 6;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 55 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C c (new)
Cc. whereas Strasbourg has been the meeting place of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe since 1949 and then, from 1952, played host to the Parliamentary Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 57 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C d (new)
Cd. whereas the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg was confirmed by the Edinburgh European Council in 1992 and the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 and then incorporated in the Lisbon Treaty in 2009;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 58 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C e (new)
Ce. whereas the distribution of the seats of the European Institutions is based on the principle of polycentrism;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 59 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C f (new)
Cf. whereas, if a debate is initiated concerning the seat of the European Parliament, it will inevitably lead to discussion of the distribution of the seats of the European Institutions, which is laid down in the Treaty;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 67 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decision by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to draw up a report on the location of the seats of the European Union’s institutions;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 68 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decision by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to draw up a report on the location of the seats of the European Union’s institutions;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 70 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that only the Member States have the power to amend the Treaties, the substance of which is binding on the Institutions and their members, and that a vote on this subject can only be carried unanimously;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 72 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that, on this basis, twelve monthly plenary part-sessions, including the budgetary part-session, must be held at the Strasbourg seat, while additional part-sessions are held in Brussels;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 74 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Stresses that the additional part- sessions entail a substantial additional cost, which could be reduced by extending ordinary part-sessions in Strasbourg;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 79 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a single place; and notes that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has become a symbolic negative issue amongst most EU citizens which is detrimental to Parliament’s reputation;deleted
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 86 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a singlTakes note of the petitions submitted requesting that the European Parliament no longer meet in more than one place;, and notes that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has become a symbolic negative issue amongst most EU citizens which is detrimental to Parliament’s reputationof the arguments put forward in that respect;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 87 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a single place; and notes that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has become a symbolic negative issue amongst most EU citizens which is detrimental to Parliament’s reputationNotes that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg remains a positive symbol of European polycentrism;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 92 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the environmental example set by the European Parliament’s seat in Strasbourg, which reduced its CO2 emissions by 57% between 2006 and 2010 by taking special measures, meaning that these now represent 3.6% of all Parliament’s CO2 emissions;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 96 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Points to the economic and social importance of the European Parliament for the Strasbourg region;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 97 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Points to the tradition of geographical diversity in the siting of EU institutions;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 99 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Stresses that concentrating EU powers in the city of Brussels would adversely effect the way the European public views the EU;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 101 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Emphasises that Strasbourg has come to be viewed by the public as the European capital of democracy and human rights owing to the institutions that are based there, among them the European Parliament;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 103 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 f (new)
2f. Emphasises that the public associates the city of Brussels with the European Commission, while the city of Strasbourg continues to be associated with the European Parliament;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 105 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 g (new)
2g. Expresses concern at the steady increase (+23.8% between 2006 and 2010) in the number of committee, political group and delegation meetings held outside the European Parliament’s places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 107 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 h (new)
2h. Notes that the carbon footprint for travel in connection with these meetings was 6 350 tonnes of CO2 en 2010, while for the seat in Strasbourg it was 4 199 tonnes that year;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 108 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 i (new)
2i. Notes that economic and environmental costs could be rationalised by limiting the number of meetings held outside the European Parliament’s official places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 120 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be able to state a preference for its future;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 121 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be able to state a preference for its futuresystem of a single seat and three places of work;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 123 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be able to state a preference for its futureNotes that travel is an inherent part of the duties of Members of the European Parliament, and that the continuation of the monthly journeys between Brussels and Strasbourg is not a significant factor in terms of the European Parliament’s reputation among EU citizens;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 125 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Points out, too, that Parliament’s Strasbourg seat, which achieved a 57% reduction in CO2 emissions between 2006 and 2010, is leading the way on respect for the environment and that, as data compiled by Parliament’s Secretariat shows, its detractors have substantially overestimated its annual costs;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 129 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Draws attention to the emblematic nature of the city of Strasbourg, symbolising as it does reconciliation between Germany and the other nations of Europe;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 130 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underscores the symbolic and historical importance of the European Parliament’s location in Strasbourg as part of the process of European reconciliation;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 134 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recognises the educational and civic value of Parliament’s Strasbourg seat, which attracts 100 000 visitors a year outside part-session periods, as well as 10 000 students on the Euroscola programme;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 135 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that European integration necessarily entails mobility and that this applies to all national and European political representatives and officials, and that mobility is an intrinsic aspect of the work of MEPs, as representatives of the European Union;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 138 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recognises that efforts are needed to improve working conditions during ordinary part-sessions in Strasbourg;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 139 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Considers that decentralisation of the legislative authority away from Brussels strengthens its independence;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 141 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Considers that choice of the EU institutions’ seats has always been guided by a desire to bring the Union as close to ordinary people as possible and not to concentrate it in one place;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 145 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for Parliament to express its view as to whether the current arrangement should continue; and if an appropriate majority vote is recorded, recommends that Parliament propose Treaty changes under Article 48.deleted
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 152 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for Parliament to express its view as to whetherEmphasises that only the cEurrent arrangement should continue; and if an appropriate majority vote is recorded, recommends that Parliament propose Treaty changes under Article 48opean Council has a remit to determine Parliament’s seat; sees the location of Parliament’s seat as part of the broader question of determining the seats of all the EU institutions.
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 153 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for Parliament to express its view as to whether the current arrangement should continue; and if an appropriate majority vote is Emphasises that the Committee’s report was prepared under the ordinary own- initiative procedure and there is thus no obligation to implement the proposals, and further that the matter of the EU institutions’ seats is governed directly by the Treaties and is therecforded, recommends that Parliament propose Treaty changes under Article 48.e subject to the political will of the Member States acting unanimously;
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 157 #

2012/2308(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that the own-initiative report cannot be used as means of circumventing the EU Treaties, which provide that the seat of the European Parliament shall be in Strasbourg and that 12 part-sessions per year shall be held there.
2013/06/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 20 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls the European Commission and Member States to integrate a general approach of equality between women and men in all employment policies, to take the necessary measures to facilitate the employment of women and to include this approach in the employment guidelines of the European Union;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Whereas the current effects of the crisis will have long-term impacts for women, due to the highly gender segregated labour-market, in which the concentration of women in sectors that are characterised by low pay, informal and part-time patterns of work, which have a direct impact on women's pension contributions;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas it should be noted that unemployed women are often not included in official figures because they tend to withdraw from the labour market and to perform unpaid or informal work, and that there are currently few studies on the impact of cuts in public expenditure allocated to gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Whereas the disparities between men and women in employment, wages, career breaks and part-time work due to family responsibilities have serious consequences for the calculation of pensions and therefore, their pension is often lower and they are more likely at risk of poverty;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Da (new)
Da. whereas a crisis situation, such as the current one, calls for deep-seated structural reforms of the job market;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas for women a fall in the number of jobs frequently goes hand in hand with an adjustment in working hours, and whereas it is extremely likely that recovery will be felt more rapidly in the industrial sector thereby bringing about recovery in male employment, which will pick up faster than female employment; whereas economy measures in the public services will have a more lasting effect on female employment, and this could jeopardise, in the long-term, the progress achieved in the field of gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls also on the Member States to develop vocational training policies;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Stresses the need to encourage female entrepreneurship by encouraging women to set up their company and by facilitating women's access to finance;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Ha (new)
Ha. Whereas the budget cuts in social services compromise women’s financial independence, as such services often provide a major supplement to their income and they utilise those services more frequently than men, with single mothers and women pensioners living alone being faced with the greatest aggregate losses;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Calls also on the Member States and the European Union to develop policies to promote the reconciliation of family, private and professional life;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3 d. Alert that the current situation of crisis may increase women's risk of domestic violence;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Ja (new)
Ja. Notes that the decrease in the employment gap between men and women is more a reflection of a general degeneration in living and working conditions than of progress towards increased gender equality,
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Whereas in the current situation of economic crisis and budgetary austerity, women have fewer resources to protect themselves and their children from violence and whereas it is even more important to avert the direct financial impact that violence against women and children has on the judiciary and on health and social services;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that there are still very wide disparities between the various EU Member States, with the employment rate for women varying between 48.6 % and 77.2 %, and that the contrasts in these situations call for specific tailor-made responses as part of an overarching European approach; emphasises moreover the need to have reliable common indicators so needs can be assessed and suitable responses found;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 72 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that even before the economic crisis, women were in the majority in temporary or part-time posts and that the crisis has reinforced this trend, hence placing many already vulnerable women at a heightened risk of social exclusion;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 81 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that women have played a vital role in resisting the crisis and that, according to recent publications, they are playing a vital role in; firmly believes that they offer considerable potential for the improved competitiveness and performance of business, particularly where they are in management, and posts; considers that involving them in the drawing up of recovery plans in order to encourage social cohesion is therefore a matter of particular urgency;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 84 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Insists on the need to ensure that the current economic and financial crisis and the ensuing budget restrictions do not jeopardise the progress achieved by policies promoting gender equality nor serve as a pretext for reducing efforts in this respect, but rather must encourage Member States to incorporate that aspect into their employment policies;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 97 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 8a (new)
8a. Stresses the importance of implementing immediately return to work policies and business sector insertion schemes for these public sector employees, the majority of whom are women whose jobs are under threat from cuts in the public sector budget;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 117 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote vocational- training policies and programmes for women, in order to increase their participation in the various business sectors, and especially in those economic and financial sectors where women employees are scarce, envisaging specific support measures so women are able to combine their workload, training and family life; recalls the important role played by the European Social Fund in assisting entry into employment through training policies and suggests the Member States and local authorities promote recourse to this fund;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 135 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on Member States to support job creation in the social economy which is dominated by unpaid work by women, and especially to seek out and implement new solutions that raise the profile of non-clandestine informal work;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 143 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Council to adopt an action plan to achieve the targets that were set in Barcelona for better childcare provision with the development of company and inter- company crèches; stresses the importance of collective bargaining between management and labour in order to improve the work-life balance at sectoral, national and regional level, and of relaxing the access and attendance conditions for childcare systems associated with categories of jobs performed by women and of setting a minimum period of three month’s notice for childcare placements, so as to enable women to reconcile their family and working lives;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 147 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 18a (new)
18a. Stresses the need for an even spread in austerity programmes, particularly as regards maintaining healthcare and caring services, in order not to aggravate the care burden on women, which would drag them back into a traditional family role;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 159 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 19a (new)
19a. Pending EU-wide harmonisation of maternity, paternity and parental leave, calls on the Member States to maintain these and family allowances at the same levels in order not to reduce women’s income, and also to ensure that women’s maternity leave rights are not infringed;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 164 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 20a (new)
20a. Invites the Member States and the Commission to propose solutions that help women continue in their careers and that combat in particular the wage inequalities arising from maternity periods;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 169 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 21a (new)
21a. Calls for assistance to women’s organisations and to gender equality organisations to be maintained in order not to compromise the active participation of women in social and political life; so that those organisations and bodies can play a key role in offering support to women and their projects and actively participate in preparing future recovery measures,
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2012/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Article 24a (new)
24a. Invites the Member States to adopt budgetary instruments that reflect the need for gender equality;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 166 #

2012/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Member States to make greater use of private law instruments to facilitate the provision of social housing, such as long lease arrangements, obviating the need to purchase land for building purposes, and continued individual ownership of social housing by encouraging lessor usufruct arrangements;
2013/02/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2012/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Asks the Commission to make other potential sources of financing available to Member States for the development and renovation of social housing stock as forms of social investment, and to retain the reduced rates of VAT that apply to such investment, given the labour-intensive nature of the sector and its very limited impact on cross-border trade within the EU; urges that consideration be given to applying the same rates of VAT to social housing as to basic necessities;
2013/02/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2012/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on Member States to establish attractive tax systems to encourage property owners to improve the energy efficiency of their buildings, and to refine the definition of ‘decent housing’ in order to counter the trend whereby the most energy-inefficient housing is rented to people on low incomes;
2013/02/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need to adapt labour legislation to the economic situation by introducing flexible options and getting rid of pointless texts or those which hamper the labour market;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Points out in this regard that it is vital to increase flexibility, in particular as regards the use of part-time, of temporary contracts in accordance with the needs of the company, or by providing options to work whilst drawing a pension;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses that it is vital for Member States to be inventive by simplifying provisions that are not strictly necessary for the protection of workers and by adapting their legislation to the economic situation;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Stresses the importance of ensuring greater social cohesion, without neglecting cooperation by companies in achieving this, which could be encouraged notably by allowing them to promote their innovative and virtuous actions in social matters through a label which would attract new investors and promote the development of a European social model in the long term;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Warns that austerity measures should not compromise the quality of employment, nor social protection and health and safety standards; encourages Member states to promote identification of companies and SMEs doing effort to be more socially virtuous than minimal legal obligations.
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member States, while pursuing fiscal consolidation, to secensure efficient investments in education lifelong learning and training.
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C a (new)
Ca. Asks that the involvement of women in running associations for children, the disabled or for people who are dependent, and their commitment to this, may be taken into account in the accreditation of their prior experience, allowing them to avoid career breaks that would reduce the size of their future pension;
2013/01/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 21 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph D a (new)
Da. Asks that, where necessary, Member States re-examine social security systems in order to avoid a significant disparity between women’s and men’s pension levels, and that they consider introducing corrective factors that take account of gaps in contributions caused by short- term working;
2013/01/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need to reduce the pay differential for men and women with the same skills and the same jobs, as this causes women’s income to lag ever more behind that of men and raises the high number of women living in poverty when they retire or are widowed;
2013/01/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 68 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to encourage Member States to recognise in their welfare systems, and when retirement is reached, time spent, by women more often than not, in caring for and supporting dependents;
2013/01/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 1 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Union’s policy on development cooperation is guided by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and, two of those Goalswhich specifically concern women – MDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower women and MDG 5: Improve maternal health, – while a further three contribute directly to improving the living conditions of women and girls – MDG 2: Achieve universal primary education, MDG 4: Reduce child mortality and MDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas sexual violence in the form of mass rapes, human trafficking and other forms of sexual abuse of women and children is still used as a tactic of war by armed forces and perpetrators of sexual violence in conflict regions, and notably in certain ACP countries; whereas rape in wartime has been recognised by the United Nations as a crime against humanity, and whereas since 2008 the United Nations Security Council has been committed to combating the use of sexual violence as a tactic of war;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas where more women are engaged in conflict resolution and peace-building processes, they play a key role in peace negotiations, broadening the scope of reconstruction, rehabilitation and peace building;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction at the recognition given in various action plans and communications to the key role played in development by gender equality and women’s empowerment, and calls for that priority to be put into practice in the geographic programmes; calls also for better coordination with the thematic programmes financed via Intra-ACP cooperation and the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI);
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a stepping-up of efforts to achieve the MDGs relating to gender equality and maternal health and requests that measures immediately be considered for the post-2015 period, notably in regard to MDG 3 on gender equality and empowering women and MDG 5 on maternal health, reproductive health and access to family planning;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the move by the UNFPA to set up a high level taskforce to head up the review of the International Conference on Population and Development, particularly in regard to women’s sexual and reproductive rights, their right to reproductive health and combating HIV/AIDS;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Draws attention to the fact that progress on MDG 2 on education has been mixed as progress has been made in terms of schooling for girls, but not in regard to their completing their studies; calls on the ACP countries and all international partners to devise and implement as priority development policies all the measures necessary for girls to finish primary school and have access to secondary and higher education;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls therefore for enhanced financing for programmes which aim at ensuring all girls have access to education (bearing in mind that female education is a cornerstone in building more egalitarian societies), at promoting women’s economic independence and reducing sexual exploitation of girls and women worldwide;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls that democracy entails the full participation by women in public life, as stated in international and regional instruments such as the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the rights of women in Africa;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Strongly supports the inclusion of Gender Advisors or Gender Focal Points in EU delegations and common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions, and calls on the High Representative/Vice-President to provide them with resources and the appropriate means and spheres of activity;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Affirms the key role of women in democratic transition processes, in state-building and consolidation and in conflict resolution, pacification and stabilisation; encourages the Commission, the EEAS and the ACP countries to promote tangible and voluntary policies that promote the presence of women around negotiating tables and in political and economic decision-making positions;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Calls on the Commission to apply the performance indicators established in the EU plan of action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development: 1) at least 80 % of funds to include gender-sensitive indicators, 2) at least 75 % of all projects or programmes to score gender as a principle objective (G-2) or gender as a significant objective (G-1), and 3) at least 50 % of indicative multiannual programmes to identify gender-equality related actions;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2012/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Asks the Commission to provide the European Parliament with a progress report on implementation of the EU plan of action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development;
2013/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for legal rules to be introduced requiring credit institutions to provide a rapid response to a financing request from an SME;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls for a simplification of the applicable labour law rules, which, owing to their complexity, can sometimes represent a barrier to employment;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls for simple rules to be laid down, except where duly specified, to separate the assets of a company from those of the director, even if the head of the company carries out that activity on an individual basis;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas neurodegenerative diseases are more frequent in the over-65s (they affect about 1 person in 20 after age 65, 1 in 5 after age 80, and 1 in 3 after age 90) and whereas studies show that the Alzheimer’s disease rate among women over 90 is 81.7%, compared with 24% for men;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas age is a risk factor for the development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (the most common form of dementia); whereas over 7.3 million people in Europe suffer from dementia; whereas studies show that the Alzheimer’s disease rate among women over 90 is 81.7 % (compared with 24% for men);
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 94 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to publish an assessment of the impact of the world financial and economic crisis on elderly women, focusing on access to preventive health care and treatment;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 102 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for information concerning health to be disseminated by means of publicity campaigns or health information for Member State nationals, in particular the less favoured sections of the population; urges each Member State to establish by age bracket a list of appropriate medical examinations to be reimbursed in full;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 104 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Regrets the lack of attention being given to the effects on elderly women in Europe of increased alcohol consumption and calls on the Commission and Member States to carry out surveys with a view to dealing with the problem and its impact on their physical and mental health;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 115 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to improve the quality of life and dignity of Alzheimer’s patients and their families, taking into account gender-related issues;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 119 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes with concern that the suicide rate in the EU is highest among the over-65s and the numbers of suicide attempts are higher for women than for men and that this has grown worse with the economic crisis;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 123 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to organise specific training courses for general practitioners and mental health professionals, including doctors, psychologists, and nurses, on the prevention and treatment of depressive disordersneurodegenerative disorders and the treatment of depressive disorders, focusing on the additional challenges facing elderly women;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 137 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on Member States to ensure that welfare protection schemes, including health insurance, takes account of unemployment and social difficulties affecting women so that they are not left unprotected;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 140 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Calls on Member States to further develop online health services so as to help make it possible for elderly women, who are often isolated for reasons of mobility, to remain independent and continue living at home and make health services more accessible to them;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 143 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls for medical studies to include wider training in listening skills and psychology; calls for social workers also to be more closely involved in this policy of prevention;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 149 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to disseminate an EU-wide culture of prevention through specific information and awareness campaigns aimed at schools, universities, workplaces, and centres for the elderly, drawing on the cooperation of professionals, local authorities, and NGOs;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 169 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Regrets the fact that 97% of health budgets is earmarked for the treatment of non-communicable diseases and only 3% for investment in prevention at a time when the cost of therapies and diagnosis is continuing to rise; calls on Member States accordingly to earmark a greater part of their health budget to prevention activities;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 175 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Draws to the attention of the Member States that elderly women are even more vulnerable to mistreatment and urges the Member States to step up measures to prevent abuse of elderly people in the home or in institutions;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 185 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls for action to be taken accordingly, in the form of information and education at school and through health messages, regarding the importance of ensuring correct nutrition and the health risks of failure to do so;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 191 #

2012/2129(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to formulate public information campaigns regarding Alzheimer’s disease (that is to say the disease itself and possibilities of treatment and care) in cooperation with national and European Alzheimer associations;
2012/09/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 31 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010- 2015’ (COM(2010)0491)
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Strongly supports the recognition, in the Commission communication, that ‘helping to mitigate the social effects of the current crisis’ is part of the social responsibility of enterprises; calls on businesses to undertake initiatives for youth job creationthe creation of jobs for women and youth as a practical example of their commitment;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Invites the Multi-stakeholder Forum to consider possible courses of action in response to the growing casualisation of employment with a special focus on women’s employment, enforced part-time working in place of full-time employment, the rise in exploitative work through increased sub- contracting and the resurgence of the informal sector, all of which are a result of the economic crisis;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises that business closures and retrenchment are jeopardising some of the gains made through CSR in terms of the employment of marginalised groups in society; calls on the Commission to undertake a major analysis of the social impact of the crisis on such initiatives, including a gender based approach;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the Council Resolution of 29 June 1978 on an action programme of the European Communities on safety and health at work, in particular article 41 __________________ 1 4. Develop a preventive and protective action for substances recognized as being carcinogenic, by fixing exposure limits, sampling requirements and measuring methods, and satisfactory conditions of hygiene at the work place, and by specifying prohibitions where necessary.
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas local communities lack expertise and have serious shortcomings in the execution of prevention, surveillance and enforcement tasks, which are often too fragmented;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T
T. whereas asbestos exposure is a threat to the general population and causes diseases to a recognised extent1; __________________ 1 A parliamentary committee concluded in 1978 after an 18-month investigatory period that asbestos presented ‘a danger both to workers in the asbestos industry and to those exposed in other situations’ (European Parliament 1978)
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the EU to develop models for monitoring existing asbestos in private and public buildings including residential and non-residential housing, land, infrastructure, logistics and piping;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the EU to establish action plans for owners of public buildings for the safe removal of asbestos by 2032 and to encourage private house owners to audit their premises for ACMs;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to propose a specific directive with minimum requirements for the vocational training of construction and maintenance workers and management, including construction professionals who are working incidentally with asbestos;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls for offenders to be prosecuted and punished, and therefore for any obstacles to such action which may be contained in national criminal law to be surveyed and abolished;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to urgently put forward a proposal to amend Directive 2004/37/EC on the protection of workers from the risks related to carcinogens and mutagens at work, ensuring that the health of workers at risk of being exposed to carcinogens be protected and safeguarded through the promotion and exchange of best practices in prevention and diagnosis;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for recognition procedures to be simplified and facilitated;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the EU to ensure that all asbestos-related occupational diseasdiseases, including pleural plaques, are recognised and compensated for;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Calls, more generally, for the concept of health and safety of employees to be taken into account by national law and to constitute a performance obligation for employers with reference to Framework Directive 89/931/EC;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the EU to address the unacceptable dumping of asbestos on developing countries at forums where trade agreements are being discussed, in particular at the WTO, and to exert diplomatic and financial pressure on asbestos-exporting countries to shut down asbestos mining industries and to stop the illegal and unethical practice of exporting end-of-life ships containing asbestos;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Condemns European financial investment in global asbestos industries;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2012/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b (new)
35b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that vessels carrying asbestos as cargo in transit can neither dock nor use port facilities or temporary storage within the EU;
2012/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas, the ‘Orientations for reference in managing change and its social consequences’ drawn up by the social partners in October 2003 have however not been followed by any significantlegislative measure leading to the practical implementation and concrete application of those guidelines, with the exception of two cycles of national seminars held by the social partners in the framework of their pluriannual work programmes;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1 Recital 1
(1) When dealing with anticipation, preparation and management of restructuring, companies, workers' representatives and the other stakeholders, each in their respective capacity and competence, and at a moment which corresponds to their different responsibilities, act in a spirit of cooperation, based on timely and comprehensive information and consultation.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1 Recital 2
(2) Anticipation, preparation and management of change must take place in the context of strengthening social dialogue and with a view to promoting change in a manner compatible with the preservation of the priority objectives of competitiveness and employment.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 4
(4) Restructuring is facilitated and its impact softened when companies develop on a regular or permanent basis the skills and competences of their workers.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 6
(6) It is a widely recognised that any restructuring operation should be subject toaccompanied by an explanation and of justification to the stakeholders.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 8
(8) The active involvementcooperation and assistance of public authorities at the relevant level in the preparation and management, management and above all implementation of restructuring operations contributes greatly to limiting their negative impact.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 10
(10) Such an Union framework should apply to major restructuring operations of companies and groups of companies, those which employ on the territory of the Union at least 500 workers, and to restructuring operations of a implying either an important number of workers or an important percerntain dimension, covering at least 100 workers in a single company or 500 employege of the staff of those companies, in a company and its dependent companies or one or more Member States over a period of three monthslimited amount of time.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 2, paragraph 1
1. The purpose of the Directive is to promote and facilitate information and consultation in economic change and improve the way in which companies, employees' representatives, public authorities and other relevant stakeholders, each with different responsibility and a sequenced role in the process of restructuring, throughout the Union anticipate, prepare and manage in a socially responsible way corporate restructuring.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 3, paragraph 1, point b
(b) "dependent companies" mean companies in a situation of substantial dependence of the ones above by reasons of subcontracting, supply contract and others;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 3, paragraph 1, point f
(f) "public authorities" mean bodies of the public administration at the relevant level, as designated by Member States, including local employment services;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 3, paragraph 2
2. The present Directive covers restructuring operations affecting at least 100either a certain amount of employees in a singlwithin the company or 500 employees in a company and its dependent companiesthe group of companies, or a certain percentage of the same in one or more Member States over a period of three limited amounths of time.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 4, paragraph 3
3. To that end, companies shall recognise the right of every employee to benefit from appropriate training in order to anticipate changed job requirements within companies. Employees shall recognise that education and lifelong learning are necessary to enhance their employability and shall accept relevant training offers.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, point b
(b) multiannual plans of employment and skills development covering the followingmost relevant areas:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 3
3. Every employee shall be offered a given number of hours of training per year to be determined by law or collective agreement. Any refusal to accept that offer by employees shall only be permitted on justified grounds. However, the training needs should be mainly identified through 5-year skill-assessment, to check that their employability is maintained.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 4
4. The provisions of paragraphs 1 to 3 above do not apply to companies and employees covered by an agreement, concluded at the relevant level and with the relevant parties, on the procedures for anticipating and skills or assessment forward-looking planning of employment and skills needs.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 6, paragraph 1
1. Except in circumstances where restructuring is triggered by unforeseen or sudden events, any restructuring operation shall be preceded by an appropriate preparation with all the stakeholders concernedconducted with all the stakeholders concerned, according to their respective competences, with a view to preventing or alleviating its economic, social and local impact.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 6, paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the context of any restructuring the impact on dismissals should be dealt with as a priority, with a clear and transparent commitment by the company with regard to employment.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 1
1. When the need to restructure occursis seen, on the basis of objective criteria, to exist as a result of the need to preserve their competitiveness and long-term prosperity, companies shall consider redundancies only as last resort and only after considering all possible alternative options and identifying and, where available, implementing supporting measures.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 2
2. In particular, companies shall consider the followingall relevant options as alternatives and engage into a dialogue with internal and external stakeholders to try and associate them to the solution for redundancies:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 2, point e
(e) internal or external redeploymentclassification within the group of companies or other companies not belonging to the group;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2012/2061(INI)

3. When redundancies cannot be avoided or as part of the package to be implemented in the context of alternative options, companies, with the assistance of local authorities and public/private employment services, shall make available to the employees concerned measures that aim to enhance their employability and help them to re-enter the labour market as quickly as possible. Particular attention shall be given by the public authorities to the quality of the social plan and in particular to training measures, assistance for voluntary departure and measures for women and older employees. Severance payments made by the company which have the nature of damages to compensate for the injury suffered by the employee shall be dealt with specifically in each Member State’s legislation. The amount of such payments shall be greater than that provided for in the case of individual dismissal. Furthermore, the sums paid shall be exempt from social contributions and tax.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 1
1. Public authorities and employment services at different levels shall intervencontribute in an anticipation and management capacity by:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 332 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 2
2. Public authorities shall monitorand employment services shall assist or advice the mechanisms for long-term planning and multi-annual plans of employment and skills needs developed within companies, notably in organizing skill assessment for all employees concerned.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 340 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point a
a) create permanent bodies, networks or observatories to monitor change processes and provide free skill assessment, in priority for employees suffering from lack of employability;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 346 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point b
b) promote territorial employment pacts aimed at favouring employment creation and adaptation and try to attract investment by all means;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point c
c) promote or create mechanisms facilitating employment transitions, including by company networking and exchange of good practices;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 373 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 14, paragraph 1
1. Companies shall monitortry to develop knowledge, on a permanent basis, in co- operation with external bodies and authorities, the psycho- social health of employees affected by restructuring processes, both redundant employees and those staying in the company, in a spirit of prevention.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 14, paragraph 2
2. Companies shall create tools for the regular evaluation and reporting on their restructuring practices, in co-operation with employees' representatives and when appropriate, with the external organisations involved in that process.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 406 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide that companies that do not comply with the provisions resulting from the Directive shall not benefit from any funding in provenance of European Union budget in the five-year period following a judicial decision recognising the breach. Member States will also ensure that the public authorities and all bodies depending on its own authority, provide the assistance or advice which is required from them in order to ease and facilitate a smooth process of restructuring, in order to minimize the impact.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. Whereas at all levels of training, the percentage of men with jobs is higher than it is for women, even though the latter may be at an equal level of training, or higher, than that of the men;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. Whereas creating a balance between work and family life is essential if women are to find work in the service sector as in all other professional sectors;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls upon Member States to ensure that the public sector has an exemplary attitude regarding equal access to employment in the public service and especially to management positions.
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for education of young people for the promotion of equality between men and women and for the fight against stereotypes to begin at school;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 64 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that a rise in the educational level of women has not always beenis seldom matched by them moving up the hierarchy at work or an improvement in their conditions of employment, so much so that over- qualification could be said to exist in the female population;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for an end to the glass ceiling in public service that prevents women from gaining positions of high responsibility, the public sector must play an exemplary role in this field;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #

2012/2046(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that the economic crisis hasmay lead to a reduction in gender equality measures, which together with the fact that male employment rates tend to recover more quickly than they do for women, is having a negative impact on women’s employment in the service sector, on their career and their pension;
2012/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Hopes that it will be made easier for all workers. and in particular for workers in small businesses, to join a mutual society, and that they will be encouraged to do so;
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Hopes, in that case, that a worker’s membership of a system of mutual societies will be encouraged by exemptions from social security contributions or by tax relief;
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Hopes, therefore, that this European statute will be ambitious and innovative with a view to protecting workers and their families when they move within the European Union;
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that EU public funds should be used, to a much higher degree, for greendurable collective uses;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 31 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for the abolconditioning of EU subsidies to environmentally hazardous activitiesactivities that benefit the environment and social durability;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 33 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to focus its research efforts, a vital lever, in order to finance innovative durable transport projects;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Member States to promote remote working by means of social and tax incentives, and by providing a protective legal framework for workers;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. With each local situation differing, calls for statistical data to be compiled prior to the development of any transport hierarchy in order to measure the environmental impact of public and private methods of transport, and calls on the public authority to be exemplary in this matter.
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Calls on Member States to integrate the impact of the use of transport by public authorities in the state audits carried out by the Chambers of Audit;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 53 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on Member States to use and develop ways to encourage women to choose courses and careers in the environmental, transport and energy sectors; whilst determinedly fighting stereotypes that favour careers in science for men;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2012/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Notes that for women to participate in the green economy on the same terms as men, there is a need for increased childcare and elderly care centres, that both women and men must be able to combine work and familyreconcile family and working life, and that women’s sexual and reproductive rights must be ensured;
2012/06/08
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 101 #

2012/2011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The measures taken shall be proportionate to the aim sought. In the context of recruitment, the measures taken shall be directly and necessarily linked to the employment offered or the assessment of professional aptitude. The employee shall be informed of the methods used and the confidential nature of the data in every case.
2012/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2012/2004(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 1
– models and principles for employee and stakeholder participation;
2012/06/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2012/2004(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 2
- while profit-making in general is allowed and even supporteds can be generated by social business, profits, operating surpluses, funds and reserves are primarily to be reinvested in quality, innovation and the development of services instead of the remuneration of shareholders and investors;
2012/06/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2012/2004(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Declares that even if social enterprises do not exclusively offer social products and services, their entrepreneurial objective willmust seek greater includesion, e.g. the inclusion and work integration of vulnerable groups, the provision of socio- pedagogic assistance or the (re)integration of persons with disabilities through training or sheltered workshops;
2012/06/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2012/2004(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that the ‘EU Programme for Social Change and Innovation for 2014- 2020’, with its Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship axis, willmay play a very important role in the effort to guarantee better access to micro-credit; however, this programme should take into account the diversity of the funding needs of social enterprises depending on their different activities;
2012/06/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter the 'Fund') should strengthen social cohesion by contributing to the reduction of poverty in the Union by supporting national schemes that provide non-financial assistance to the most deprived persons to alleviate food deprivation, homelessness and material deprivation ofand material deprivation, particularly among the homeless and children.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 29 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to set out an appropriate financial framework, the Commission should establish, by means of implementing acts, an annual breakdown of global resources by Member State using an objective and transparent method reflecting disparities in terms of poverty, relative poverty and material deprivation.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The operational programme of each Member State should identify and justify the forms of material deprivation to be addressed, and describe the objectives and features of the assistance to the most deprived persons that will be provided through the support of national schemes. ItFood insecurity should be the form of deprivation which Member States tackle before all others. The programme should also include elements necessary to ensure its effective and efficient implementation of the operational programme.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 35 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to improve the quality and design of each operational programme and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the Fund, ex ante and ex post evaluations should be conducted. Those evaluations should be supplemented by surveys on the most deprived persons who have benefited from the operational programme and, if necessary, by evaluations during the programming period. The responsibilities of Member States and the Commission in this respect should be specified.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 37 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Citizens have the right to know how the Union’s financial resources are invested and to what effects. For the purpose of ensuring wide dissemination of information about the achievements of the Fund and to ensure accessibility and transparency of funding opportunities, detailed rules about information and communication, especially in relation to the responsibilities of the Member States and the beneficiaries, should be set out in such a way that the dignity of the end recipients is not undermined.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Uniform and, equitable and simple rules on the eligibility period, operations and expenditures for the Fund should be applied across the Union. The conditions of eligibility should reflect the specific nature of the Fund’s objectives and target populations, notably through simple and adequate conditions of eligibility of the operations as well as forms of support and rules and conditions of reimbursement.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 42 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Fund for the period 2014-2020 shall be EUR 2 500 000 000 at 2011 prices, in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex IInot less than the 2007-2013 allocation for the European food aid programme for deprived persons.
2013/03/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 46 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In order to ensure broad support within society for the most deprived persons and to tackle food waste, Member States should remove obstacles to the donation of food or basic consumer goods by firms to food banks, civil society organisations and other stakeholders.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) In accordance with the principle of shared management, Member States should have the primary responsibility, through their management and control system, for the implementation and control of their operational programme, while seeking at all times to improve effectiveness and reduce bureaucracy.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 52 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to improve the quality and design of each operational programme and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the Fund, ex ante and ex post evaluations should be conducted. Those evaluations should be supplemented by surveys, including data broken down by gender and by age, on the most deprived persons who have benefited from the operational programme and, if necessary, by evaluations during the programming period. The responsibilities of Member States and the Commission in this respect should be specified.
2013/03/01
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Union budget commitments should be effected annually. In order to ensure effective programme management, it is necessary to lay down simple common rules for interim payment requests, the payment of the annual balance and the final balance.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 59 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
The Fund shall promote social cohesion in the Union by contributing to achieving the poverty reduction target of at least 20 million of the number of persons at risk of poverty and social exclusion in accordance with the Europe 2020 strategy. The Fund shall contribute to achieving the specific objective of alleviating the worst forms of poverty in the Union by providing non- financial assistance to the most deprived persons. This objective shall be measured by the number of persons receiving assistance from the Fund. In order to better identify requirements and improve the Fund’s provisions for the most deprived, the Commission and the Member States shall be asked to provide beneficiary data broken down by gender and by age.
2013/03/01
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
(41a) In order to ensure that delays in the implementation of this Regulation at the beginning of 2014 do not lead to a sudden drop-off in food aid, the Commission should take the transitional measures necessary to guarantee that persons dependent on food aid are not at risk of food poverty.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter ‘the Fund’) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 and determines the objectives of the Fund, the scope of its support, the financial resources available and the criteria for their allocation and lays down the rules necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the Fundat the Fund is effective and easy to implement.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 66 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 2
(2) 'partner organisations' means public bodies or non-for-profit organisations that deliver the food orand possibly other essential goods directly or through other partner organisations to the most deprived persons, and whose operations have been selected by the managing authority in accordance with Article 29(3)(b);
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 72 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8
(8) The Commission and the Member States shall ensure the effectiveness of the Fund, in particular through monitoring, reporting and evaluation, providing details broken down by gender and by age.
2013/03/01
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 74 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
The Fund shall promote social cohesion in the Union by contributing to achieving the poverty reduction target of at least 20 million of the number of persons at risk of poverty and social exclusion in accordance with the Europe 2020 strategy. The Fund shall contribute to achieving the specific objective of alleviating the worst forms of poverty in the Union, and first and foremost food insecurity, by providing non- financial assistance to the most deprived persons. This objective shall be measured by the number of persons receiving assistance from the Fund.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 78 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The Fund shall support national schemes whereby food products and basic consumer goods for the personal use of the most deprived persons, in particular homeless persons or of children, are distributed to the most deprived persons through partner organisations selected by Member States.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 91 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9
(9) The Commission and the Member States shall carry out their respective roles in relation to the Fund with the aim, placing greater emphasis ofn reducing the administrative burden for beneficiaries.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 106 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Fund for the period 2014-2020 shall be EUR 23 500 000 000 at 2011 prices, in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex II.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 133 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the consistency of the operational programme with this Regulation and its contribution to the objectives of the Fund, taking into account the ex ante evaluation carried out in accordance with Article 14.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 139 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States shall draft the annual implementation report in accordance with the template adopted by the Commission, including the list of common input and outcome indicators.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 140 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The annual implementation reports shall be admissible where they contain all the information required in accordance with the template referred in paragraph 2, including the common indicators. The Commission shall inform the Member State concerned within 15 working days from the date of receipt of the annual implementation report if it is not admissible. Where the Commission has not sent that information within the time limit, the report shall be deemed admissible.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 141 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Member States shall draft the final implementation report in accordance with the template adopted by the Commission.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 142 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall adopt the template for the annual implementation report, including the list of common indicators and for the final implementation report by means of implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 60(2).
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 143 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission may address observations to a Member State concerning the implementation of the operational programme. The managing authority shall within three months inform the Commission of the corrective measures taken.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 144 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. The managing authority shall make public a summary of the contents of each annual and final implementation report.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 148 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. 1. Member States shall provide the resources necessary for carrying out evaluations, and shall ensure that procedures are in place to produce and collect the data necessary for evaluations, including data related to the common indicators referred to in Article 11.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 149 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
Article 14 Ex ante evaluation 1. Member States shall carry out an ex ante evaluation of the operational programme. 2. The ex ante evaluation shall be carried out under the responsibility of the authority responsible for preparing the operational programmes. It shall be submitted to the Commission at the same time as the operational programme, together with an executive summary. 3. Ex ante evaluations shall appraise the following elements: (a) the contribution to the Union objective of at least 20 million fewer people at risk of poverty and social exclusion by 2020, having regard to the selected type of material deprivation to be addressed, taking into account national circumstances in terms of poverty and social exclusion and material deprivation; (b) the internal coherence of the proposed operational programme and its relation with other relevant financial instruments; (c) the consistency of the allocation of budgetary resources with the objectives of the operational programme; (d) contribution of the expected outputs to the results; (e) the suitability of the procedures for monitoring the operational programme and for collecting the data necessary to carry out evaluations.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 153 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The managing authority shall carry out a structured survey on end recipients in 2017 and 2021, in accordance with the template provided by the Commission. The Commission shall adopt the template by means of an implementing act. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 60(2).deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 154 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may carry out, at its own initiative, evaluation of operational programmes where it has evidence suggesting any irregularity in their implementation.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 206 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 a (new)
Article 25a 1. Member States shall carry out administrative and physical checks to ensure that operational programmes are implemented in compliance with the applicable rules and shall establish the penalties applicable in the event of irregularities. 2. Member States shall fulfil the management, control and audit obligations and assume the resulting responsibilities laid down in the rules on shared management set out in the Financial Regulation and this Regulation. 3. Member States shall prevent, detect and correct irregularities and shall recover amounts unduly paid, together with any interest on late payments. 4. Member States shall establish and implement a procedure for the independent examination and resolution of complaints concerning the selection or implementation of operations cofinanced by the Fund.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 207 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26
Article 26 General principles of Member State management and control systems Management and control systems shall provide for: (a) a description of the functions of each body concerned in management and control, and the allocation of functions within each body; (b) compliance with the principle of separation of functions between and within such bodies; (c) procedures for ensuring the correctness and regularity of expenditure declared; (d) computerised systems for accounting, for the storage and transmission of financial data and data on indicators, for monitoring and for reporting; (e) systems for reporting and monitoring where the responsible body entrusts execution of tasks to another body; (f) arrangements for auditing the functioning of the management and control systems; (g) systems and procedures to ensure an adequate audit trail; (h) the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities, including fraud, and the recovery of amounts unduly paid, together with any interest;deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 210 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28
Article 28 Designation and organisation of management and control bodies 1. The Member State shall designate a national public authority or body as managing authority. 2. The Member State shall designate a national public authority or body as a certifying authority, without prejudice to paragraph 3. 3. The Member State may designate a managing authority which carries out in addition the functions of the certifying authority. 4. The Member State shall designate a national public authority or body, functionally independent from the managing authority and the certifying authority, as audit authority. 5. Provided that the principle of separation of functions is respected, the managing authority, the certifying authority, where applicable, and the audit authority may be part of the same public authority or body. 6. The Member State may designate one or more intermediate bodies to carry out certain tasks of the managing or the certifying authority under the responsibility of that authority. The relevant arrangements between the managing authority or certifying authority and the intermediate bodies shall be formally recorded in writing. 7. The Member State or the managing authority may entrust the management of part of the operational programme to an intermediate body by way of an agreement in writing between the intermediate body and the Member State or managing authority. The intermediate body shall provide guarantees of its solvency and competence in the domain concerned, as well as its administrative and financial management. 8. The Member State shall lay down in writing rules governing its relations with the managing authority, certifying authority and audit authority, the relations between such authorities, and the relations of such authorities with the Commission.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 212 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29
Article 29 Functions of the managing authority 1. The managing authority shall be responsible for managing the operational programme in accordance with the principle of sound financial management. 2. As regards the management of the operational programme, the managing authority shall: (a) draw up and submit to the Commission annual and final implementation reports; (b) make available to intermediate bodies and beneficiaries information that is relevant to the execution of their tasks and the implementation of operations respectively; (c) establish a system to record and store in computerised form data necessary for monitoring, evaluation, financial management, verification and audit; (d) ensure that the data referred to in point (c) is collected, entered and stored in the system, in compliance with the provisions Directive 95/46/CE. 3. As regards the selection of operations, the managing authority shall: (a) Draw up and apply appropriate selection procedures and criteria that are non-discriminatory and transparent; (b) ensure that the selected operation: (i) falls within the scope of the Fund and the operational programme; (ii) fulfils the criteria set out in the operational programme and in Articles 20, 21 and 24; (iii) takes into account the principles set out in Article 5(10), (11) and (12). (c) provide to the beneficiary a document setting out the conditions for support of each operation including the specific requirements concerning the products or services to be delivered under the operation, the financing plan, and the time-limit for execution; (d) satisfy itself that the beneficiary has the administrative, financial and operational capacity to fulfil the conditions defined in point (c) before approval of the operation; (e) satisfy itself that, where the operation has started before the submission of an application for funding to the managing authority, Union and national rules relevant for the operation have been complied with; (f) determine the type of material assistance to which the expenditure of an operation shall be attributed. 4. As regards the financial management and control of the operational programme, the managing authority shall: (a) verify that the co-financed products and services have been delivered and that expenditure declared by the beneficiaries has been paid by them and that it complies with applicable Union and national law, the operational programme and the conditions for support of the operation; (b) ensure that beneficiaries involved in the implementation of operations reimbursed pursuant to Article 23(1)(a) maintain either a separate accounting system or an adequate accounting code for all transactions relating to an operation; (c) put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures taking into account the risks identified; (d) set up procedures to ensure that all documents regarding expenditure and audits required to ensure an adequate audit trail are held in accordance with the requirements of Article 26(g); (e) draw up the management declaration and annual summary referred to in Article 56 (5) (a) and (b) of the Financial Regulation. 5. Verifications pursuant to paragraph 4(a) shall include the following procedures: (a) administrative verifications in respect of each application for reimbursement by beneficiaries; (b) on-the-spot verifications of operations. The frequency and coverage of the on- the-spot verifications shall be proportionate to the amount of public support to an operation and the level of risk identified by these verifications and audits by the audit authority for the management and control system as a whole. 6. On-the-spot verifications of individual operations pursuant to paragraph (5)(b) may be carried out on a sample basis. 7. Where the managing authority is also a beneficiary under the operational programme, arrangements for the verifications referred to in paragraph 4(a) shall ensure adequate separation of functions. 8. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 59, laying down the modalities of the exchange of information in paragraph 2(c). 9. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 59, laying down rules concerning arrangements for the audit trail referred to in paragraph 4(d). 10. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the template for the management declaration referred to in paragraph 4(e). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 60(2).deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 218 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32
Article 32 Procedure for designation of the managing and the certifying authorities 1. Member states shall notify to the Commission the date and form of the designation of the managing authority and, where appropriate the certifying authority, within six months of the adoption of decision adopting the operational programme. 2. The designation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on a report and an opinion of an independent audit body that assesses the management and control system, including the role of intermediate bodies therein, and its compliance with Articles 26, 27, 29 and 30, in accordance with criteria on internal environment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring established by the Commission by means of delegated act in accordance with Article 59. 3. The independent body shall carry out its work in accordance with internationally accepted audit standards. 4. Member States may decide that a managing authority or a certifying authority which has been designated in relation to an ESF co-financed operational programme pursuant to Regulation (EU) No [CPR] is deemed to be designated for the purposes of this Regulation. The Commission may request, within two months of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 1, the report and the opinion of the independent audit body and the description of the management and control system. The Commission may make observations within two months of receipt of those documents. 5. The Member State shall supervise the designated body and withdraw its designation by formal decision if one or more of the criteria referred to in paragraph 2 are no longer met, unless the body takes the necessary remedial actions within a period of probation to be determined by the Member State according to the severity of the problem. The Member State shall notify the Commission immediately of the setting of any probation period for a designated body and of any withdrawal decision.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 220 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
Article 33 Commission powers and responsibilities 1. The Commission shall satisfy itself on the basis of available information, including the information on the designation of the managing authority and the certifying authority, annual management declaration, annual control reports, annual audit opinion, annual implementation report and audits carried out by national and Union bodies, that the Member States have set up management and control systems that comply with this Regulation and that these systems function effectively during the implementation of operational programme. 2. Without prejudice to audits carried out by Member States, Commission officials or authorised Commission representatives may carry out on-the-spot audits or checks upon giving adequate prior notice. The scope of such audits or checks may include, in particular, verification of the effective functioning of management and control systems in an operational programme or a part thereof, operations and assessment of the sound financial management of operations or operational programme. Officials or authorised representatives of the Member State may take part in such audits. Commission officials or authorised Commission representatives, duly empowered to carry out on-the-spot audits, shall have access to all records, documents and metadata, irrespective of the medium in which they are stored, relating to operations supported by the Fund or to management and control systems. Member States shall provide copies of such records, documents and metadata to the Commission upon request. The powers set out in this paragraph shall not affect the application of national provisions which reserve certain acts for agents specifically designated by national legislation. Commission officials and authorised representatives shall not take part, inter alia, in home visits or the formal questioning of persons within the framework of national legislation. However, they shall have access to the information thus obtained. 3. The Commission may require a Member State to take the actions necessary to ensure the effective functioning of their management and control systems or the correctness of expenditure in accordance with this Regulation. 4. The Commission may require a Member State to examine a complaint submitted to the Commission concerning the implementation of operations co- financed by the Fund or the functioning of the management and control system.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 222 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34
Article 34 Cooperation with audit authority 1. The Commission shall cooperate with audit authorities to coordinate their audit plans and methods and shall immediately exchange the results of audits carried out on management and control systems. 2. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the annual control report, the opinion and the audit strategy, and to exchange views on issues relating to improvement of the management and control systems.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 237 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48
Article 48 Availability of documents 1. The managing authority shall ensure that all supporting documents on operations are made available to the Commission and the European Court of Auditors upon request for a period of three years. This three year period shall run from 31 December of the year of the decision on acceptance of accounts by the Commission pursuant to Article 47 or, at the latest, from the date of payment of the final balance. This three year period shall be interrupted either in the case of legal or administrative proceedings or by a duly justified request of the Commission. 2. The documents shall be kept either in the form of the originals, or certified true copies of the originals, or on commonly accepted data carriers including electronic versions of original documents or documents existing in electronic version only. 3. The documents shall be kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data were collected or for which they are further processed. 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 59 to set out which data carriers can be considered as commonly accepted. 5. The procedure for certification of conformity of documents held on commonly accepted data carriers with the original document shall be laid down by the national authorities and shall ensure that the versions held comply with national legal requirements and can be relied on for audit purposes. 6. Where documents exist in electronic version only, the computer systems used must meet accepted security standards that ensure that the documents held comply with national legal requirements and can be relied on for audit purposes.deleted
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 264 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 a (new)
Article 60a The Commission shall take the necessary financial and regulatory measures, if need be through budgetary redeployment, early pre-financing or prolongation of Regulation (EC) No 121/2012, in order to ensure the continuity of the MDP from 2013 to 2014 in the event of delays in the implementation of this regulation.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 145 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive rules on the terms and conditions of employment to be respected with regard to posted workers, Member States should apply only certain control measures or administrative formalities toimpose on undertakings posting workers for the provision of services. Such measures and requirements ma any conly be imposed provided that the competent authorities cannot carry out their supervisory task effectively without the requested information and the necessary information cannot be obtained easily from the employer of posted workers or the authorities in the Member State of establishment of the service provider within a reasonable delay and/or less restrictive measures would not ensure that the objectives of the national controls measures deemed necessary are attainedtrol measures or administrative formalities which are regarded as appropriate and necessary.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive rules on the terms and conditions of employment to be respected with regard to posted workers, Member States should apply only certaina given level of harmonisation of the control measures or administrative formalities to undertakings posting workers for the provisshould be guaranteed. Beyond that minimum requirement, Member States should be free to take any measures they deem appropriate to monitor compliance with the conditions governing the work of undertakings which are service providers on their territory and the terms and conditions of services. Suchemployment of posted workers. These control measures and requirements may only be imposed provided that the competent authorities cannot carry out their supervisory task effectively without the requested information and the necessary information cannot be obtained easily from the employer of posted workers or the authorities in the Member State of establishment of the service provider within a reasonable delay and/or less restrictive measures would not ensure that the objectives of the national controls measures deemed necessary are attained.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive rules on the terms and conditions of employment to be respected with regard to posted workers, Member States should apply only certainany control measures or administrative formalities to undertakings posting workers for the provision of services deemed to be effective and necessary for that purpose. Such measures and requirements may only be imposed provided that the competent authorities cannot carry out their supervisory task effectively without the requested information and the necessary information cannot be obtained easily from the employer of posted workers or the authorities in the Member State of establishment of the service provider within a reasonable delay and/or less restrictive measures would not ensure that the objectives of the national controls measures deemed necessary are attained.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In view of the prevalence of subcontracting in the constructiocertain sectors, and in order to protect posted workers' rights, it is necessary to ensure that in such sector at least the contractor of which the employer is a direct subcontractor can be held liable to pay to posted workers the net minimum rates of pay due, any back- payments of outstanding remuneration and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners regulated by law or collective agreement in so far as these are covered by Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC in addition to or in place of the employer. The contractor shall not be held liable if he/she has undertaken due diligence. The latter may imply preventive measures concerning proof provided by the subcontractor, including where relevant based upon information emanating from national authorities.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In view of the increasing prevalence of subcontracting in the construction sectortext of cross-border service provision, and in order to protect posted workers' rights, it is necessary to ensure that in such sector at least the contractor of which the employer is a direct subcontractor can be held liable to pay to posted workers the net minimum rates of pay due, any back- payments of outstanding remuneration and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners regulated by law or collective agreement in so far as these are covered by Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC in addition to or in place of the employer. The contractor shall not be held liable if he/she has undertaken due diligence. The latter may imply preventive measures concerning proof provided by the subcontractor, including where relevant based upon information emanating from national authorities.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) In specific cases, other contractors may, in accordance with national law and practice, be also held liable for failure to comply with the obligations under this Directive, or their liability may be limited, after consultation of the social partners at national or sectoral level.deleted
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) Public and private end-clients also have a duty of care and a role to play in ensuring that the rights of posted workers are upheld where those workers are directly employed by the contractor. The joint and several liability instrument established for contractors whose posted workers are employed by the subcontractor should apply in the same way to clients whose posted workers are employed by the contractor, since it may be that workers posted by that contractor are in the same situation as workers employed by an undertaking established in the Member State of establishment of the client with regard to the possibility to claim outstanding pay or refunds of taxes or social security contributions unduly withheld. These arrangements should not apply, however, to private individuals, who are not in a position to carry out the same checks as business end-clients.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the place where the undertaking has its registered office and administration, uses office space, pays taxes and social security, has a professional licence or is registered with the chambers of commerce or professional bodies,
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the abnormally limited number of contracts performed and/or size of turnover realised in the Member State of establishment.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 402 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a If the criteria laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article are not met, all the laws, rules and collective agreements of the host Member State shall apply to the workers concerned.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 416 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission and the Member States shall financially support joint initiatives of the relevant social partners, at the European and national level, to set up joint instruments which are aimed to inform undertakings and workers on the applicable terms and conditions to be respected according to Directive 96/71/EC.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 435 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) make the information available to workers and service providers in languages other than the national language(s) of the country in which the services are provided, if possible in summarised leaflet form indicating the main labour conditions applicable and upon requests in formats accessible to persons with disabilities, and specifying the competent authority which the posted worker may apply to in cases of non-compliance with the relevant legislation;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 441 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) indicate, if possible, a contact person at the liaison office in charge of dealing with requests for information; and makes sure that all necessary information is made available for the posting company and posted workers;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 449 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Where, in accordance with national law, traditions and practices, the terms and conditions of employment referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC are laid down in collective agreements in accordance with article 3 paragraph 1 and 8 of that Directive, Member States should ensure that the social partners shall identify these and make the relevant information, in particular concerning the different minimum rates of pay andservice providers from other Member States and posted workers are informed of these rules in an accessible and transparent way, and may, to that end, involve the social partners. The information shall specify their constituent elements of the minimum rate of pay, the method used to calculate the remuneration due and the qualifying criteria for classification in the different wage categories, , available in an accessible and transparent way for service providers from other Member States and posted workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 468 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The cooperation of the Member States shall in particular consist in replying without delay to reasoned requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations from competent authorities with respect to the situations of posting referred to in Article 1 (3) of Directive 96/71/EC, including investigation of any abuses of applicable rules on the posting of workers or possible cases of unlawful transnational activities.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 486 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Commission and the Member States shall provide financial support for joint initiatives taken by the social partners concerned, at European and national levels, with a view to establishing joint arrangements for informing undertakings and workers of the terms and conditions with which they need to comply under Directive 96/71/EC.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 524 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States may onlyshall at least impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 526 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States may onlyshall at least impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 527 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States may only imposeshall impose at least the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 545 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an obligation for a service provider established in another Member State to make a simple declaration to the responsible national competent authorities at the latest atbefore the commencement of the service provision, whereby the declaration may only covershall cover at least: (i) the identity of the service provider, the presence of one or more clearly identifiable posted workers, their anticipated number,(ii) the anticipated number of and particulars for each of the posted workers, (iii) the anticipated duration and location of twheir presence, andre the service is to be provided, and (iv) the services justifying the posting;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 550 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an obligation for a service provider established in another Member State to make a simple declaration to the responsible national competent authorities at the latest atbefore the commencement of the service provision, whereby the declaration may only covershall cover at least the identity of the service provider, the presence of one or more clearly identifiable posted workers, their anticipated number, theanticipated number of clearly and individually identifiable posted workers, the designated contact person, the beginning, anticipated duration and location of their presencewhere the service is to be provided, and the services justifying the posting;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 561 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an obligation to keep or make available and/or retain copies in paper or electronic form, during the period of posting, of the employment contract (or an equivalent document within the meaning of Directive 91/533, including, where appropriate or relevant, the additional information referred to in Article 4 of that Directive), payslips, time-sheets and proof of payment of wages or copies of equivalent documents during the period of posting, forms providing information on the membership to a social security network in the country of origin or the full contact details of the social security body to which the posted workers are affiliated during their stay in the host member country (Regulations 883/2004 EC and 987/2009 EC), certificate of fitness for work issued by a qualified Occupational Health Service from the country of origin, in an accessible and clearly identified place in its territory, such as the workplace or the building site, or for mobile workers in the transport sector the operations base or the vehicle with which the service is provided;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 563 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an obligation to keep or make available and/or retain copies in paper or electronic form of the employment contract (or an equivalent document within the meaning of Directive 91/533, including, where appropriate or relevant, the additional information referred to in Article 4 of that Directive), A1 forms, work and residence permits of third country nationals, payslips, time-sheets and proof of payment of wages or copies of equivalent documents during the period of posting in an accessible and clearly identified place in its territory, such as the workplace or the building site, or for mobile workers in the transport sector the operations base or the vehicle with which the service is provided;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 572 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a translation of the documents referred to under (b), may be justified provided these documents are not excessively long and standardised forms are generally used for such documents in one of the official languages of the host State;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) an obligation to designate a contact person who can be contacted by the competent authorities of the Member State and who is authorised to negotiate, if necessary, on behalf of the employer with the relevant social partners in the Member State to which the posting takes place, in accordance with national legislation and practice, during the period in which the services are provided.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 601 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall be free to lay down administrative requirements and control measures over and above those under points (b) and (c) provided that those requirements and measures are consistent with the Union’s principles of proportionality and necessity and on the understanding that Member States inform service providers of the new provisions in a precise, clear and accessible way;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 609 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Within three years after the date referred to in Article 20, the necessity and appropriateness of the application of national control measures shall be reviewed by the European Commission in the light of the experiences with and effectiveness of the system for cooperation and exchange of information, the development of more uniform, standardised documents, the establishment of common principles or standards for inspections in the field of the posting of workers as well as technological developments, with a view to assessing the necessity and feasibility of an EU-wide digital prior notification system and to proposing, where appropriate, any necessary amendments or modifications.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 610 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Within three years after the date referred to in Article 20, the necessity and appropriateness of the application of national control measures shall be reviewed in the light of the experiences with and effectiveness of the system for cooperation and exchange of information, the development of more uniform, standardised documents, the establishment of common principles or standards for inspections in the field of the posting of workers as well as technological developments, with a view to proposing, where appropriate, any necessary amendments or modifications.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 621 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that appropriateffective checks and monitoring mechanisms are put in place and that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their territory in order to control and monitor compliance with the provisions and rules laid down in Directive 96/71/EC and to guarantee its proper application and enforcement. Such inspections shall be based primarily on a risk assessment to be drawn up regularly by the competent authorities. The risk assessment shall identify the sectors of activity in which the employment of workers posted for the provision of services is concentrated on their territory. When making such risk assessment the realisation of big infrastructural projects, the special problems and needs of specific sectors, the past record of infringement, as well as the vulnerability of certain groups of workers shall be taken into account.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 625 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that appropriate checks and monitoring mechanisms are put in place and that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their territory in order to control and monitor compliance with the provisions and rules laid down in Directive 96/71/EC and to guarantee its proper application and enforcement. Such inspections shall be based primarily on a risk assessment to be drawn up regularly by the competent authorities. The risk assessment shall identify the sectors of activity in which the employment of workers posted for the provision of services is concentrated on their territory. When making such risk assessment the realisation of big infrastructural projects, the special problems and needs of specific sectors, the past record of infringement, as well as the vulnerability of certain groups of workers shall be taken into account.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 628 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that appropriate checks and monitoring mechanisms are put in place and that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their territory in order to control and monitor compliance with the provisions and rules laid down in Directive 96/71/EC and to guarantee its proper application and enforcement. Such inspections shallmay be based primarilyin particular on a risk assessment to be drawn up regularly by the competent authorities. The risk assessment shallmay identify the sectors of activity in which the employment of workers posted for the provision of services is concentrated on their territory. When making such risk assessment the realisation of big infrastructural projects, the special problems and needs of specific sectors, the past record of infringement, as well as the vulnerability of certain groups of workers shallmay be taken into particular account.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 709 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. With respect to the construction activities referred to in the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC, for all posting situations covered by Article 1(3) of Directive 96/71/EC, the Member States shall ensure on a non–discriminatory basis with regard to the protection of the equivalent rights of employees of direct subcontractors established in its territory, that the contractor of which the employer (service provider or temporary employment undertaking or placement agency) is a direct subcontractor can, in addition to or in place of the employer, be held liable by the posted worker and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for non-payment of the followMember States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a company that is instructing another company directly with the provision of services on its behalf is held liable for its direct subcontractor regarding:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 714 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. With respect to the construction activities referred to in the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC, fFor all posting situations covered by Article 1(3) of Directive 96/71/EC, the Member States shall ensure on a non– discriminatory basis with regard to the protection of the equivalent rights of employees of direct subcontractors established in its territory, that the contractor of which the employer (service provider or temporary employment undertaking or placement agency) is a direct subcontractor can, in addition to or in place of the employer, be held liable by the posted worker and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for non- payment of the following:
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 724 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 point a a (new)
(aa) Any outstanding travel, board and lodging/ accommodation costs unduly withheld by the employer.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 751 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article shall apply equally to the final customer, unless a private individual, vis-à-vis their contractor.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 759 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may, in conformity with Union law, provide for more stringent liability rules under national law on a non-discriminatory and proportionate basis in regard to the scope and range of subcontractor liability. Member States may also, in conformity with Union law, provide for such liability in sectors other than those contained in the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC. Member States may in these cases provide that a contractor that has undertaken due diligence as defined by national law shall not be liable.deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 778 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The requesting authority may, in accordance with the laws, regulations and administrative practices in force in its own Member State, request the competent authority in another Member State to recover a penalty or fine or notify a decision imposing a penalty or a fine, in so far as the relevant laws, regulations and administrative practices in force in the requested authority’s Member State allow such action for similar claims or decisions.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 816 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may continue to apply bilateral arrangements concerning administrative cooperation between their competent authorities as regards the application and monitoring of the terms and conditions of employment applicable to posted workers referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, in so far as these arrangements do not adversely affect the rights and obligations of the workers and companies concerned.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 823 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. In the context of bilateral agreements referred to in paragraph 2, competent authorities of the Member States shall use IMI as much as possible. In any event, where a competent authority in one of the Member States concerned has used IMI, it shall be used for any follow-up required and shall take precedence over the mechanism(s) foreseen in such a bilateral agreement with respect to administrative cooperation and mutual assistance.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 831 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
No later than 5 years after the expiry of the deadline for transposition, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the implementation of this Directive, making appropriate proposals where necessary. Risk assessments drawn up regularly by the competent authorities shall be provided with the report in order to identify the sectors of activity in which employment of workers posted for the provision of services is concentrated on their territory. These risk assessments shall make it possible to produce a map, at EU level, of the special problems and needs of specific sectors, the past record of infringements, as well as the vulnerability of certain groups of workers.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Invites the Council, the Commission and the Member States to design and implement effective multifaceted strategies for achieving parity in participation in political decision making and leadership at all levels, especially in the areas ofin all areas including macro- economic policy, trade, labour, budgets, defence and foreign affairs, through indicators, quantified targets, clear action plans and regular monitoring mechanisms followed up with corrective measures where the set targets are not met;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 42 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to launch a pledge whereby political parties at European and national level will take measures to achieve real parity in their internal decision making, in their nominations for elected office and in party electoral lists, paying attention, where applicable, to the position of women candidates on these lists;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the role of political parties as key factors in the promotion of parity; calls in consequence for the Member States to require national parties, where appropriate, to set quotas and apply rank-ordering rules to electoral candidate lists for national and EU elections, and to define and enforce appropriateffective sanctions for non-compliance, such as not funding the campaigns of candidates who do not respect these rules;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to launch parity-targeting campaigns as of 2013 well ahead of the upcoming national and European parliamentary elections;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 81 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to support parity by proposing a woman and a man as their candidates for the office of European Commissioner; calls on the President of the Commission to aim atchieve parity when forming the Commission;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 105 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Council, Commission and Member States to enable women and men to take an active part in political decision making by promoting a balance between family life and working life by means of measures such as sharing the costs of parenthood equally between both parents’ employers, and calls on the Commission to support equal access to services, minimum income and freedom from gender-based violence by appropriate legislative proposals in the form of directives;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 113 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls the importance of preferential treatment and special measures in promoting the representation of people from different backgrounds and vulnerable groups, such as people with disabilities, migrant women and members of ethnic and sexual minorities, in decision- making positions;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 129 #

2011/2295(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to take measures to increase their cooperation with other actors at international level, such as UN WOMEN and the Inter-parliamentary Union, in order to promote balanced representation of women at all levels in political life, in governments and in national parliaments, as well as at regional and local level and in local authorities;
2012/01/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2011/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the causes of the gender pay gap are complex, multiple and often interrelated and go far beyond the single issue of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value; whereas these causes include direct and indirect discrimination, as well as social and economic factors such as occupational and sectoral segregation in the labour market, undervaluing of women’s work, inequality in the balancing of work and private life, and traditions and stereotyping, including in the choice of educational paths and, in educational guidance, access to trades and professions and in employment patterns; whereas, according to expert analysis, discrimination, direct and indirect, is responsible for approximately half the difference;
2012/03/13
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2011/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to implement and enforce the recast Directive 2006/54/EC consistently and to encourage the private and public sector to play a more active role in closing the gender pay gap;
2012/03/13
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 39 #

2011/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Member States to act in an exemplary manner themselves in regard to combating unequal pay for women in general government, public institutions and public companies;
2012/03/13
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 3 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas preventing and combating violence against women, children, and young people are still as pressing a concern today as they were in 1997, the year when the Daphne initiative was adopted; whereas since it was established, the programme has thrown light on new forms of violence, including violence at day-nurseries, ill-treatment of the elderly, and sexual assault among teenagers;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 6 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas new forms of violence have arisen more recently from the growing use of online social networks;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Wishes to see the programme’s objectives retained in the 2013-2020 period,; maintains that its funding must be held at a level comparable to that of the earlier programmes and that its profile within the new- generation programme must remain high, bearing in mind its successes, its effectiveness, and its popularity;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 46 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls also on the Member States and interested partners, working with the Commission, to help achieve the goal of improving the spread of programmes across the Member States;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to channel more funding into projects aimed at alerting the young in particular to the new forms of violence linked to the growing use of online social networks (threats, psychological pressures, bullying, Internet child pornography), which are more insidious but just as likely to cause physical or mental injury;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to gather data regularly on violence against women in order to clarify the extent of the problem;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Calls on the Member States to gather data regularly on violence against women in order to clarify the extent of the problem;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 55 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Calls for the ‘most favoured European woman’ clause to be invoked for the purpose of compiling a comparative table of legislation setting out the best laws in each Member State on violence against women with a view to making that body of law enforceable;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Calls for the ‘most favoured European woman’ clause to be invoked for the purpose of compiling a comparative table of legislation setting out the best laws in each Member State on violence against women with a view to making that body of law enforceable;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2011/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Hopes that in the future it will still be possible for a large number of small NGOs to be involvedmore fully involved and backed up in partnerships of associations, as they often play a major role in identifying less well-known, taboo or new problems and in finding innovative ways to tackle them, as well as in protecting and supporting victims;
2011/11/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2011/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas initially the economic crisis mainly hit male employment, but cuts in public spending are expected to have a disproportionate impact on female employment, as many more women than men are employed in the public sector;deleted
2012/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 105 #

2011/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that, despite countless campaigns, targets and measures in recent years, the gender pay gap remains stubbornly wide, women across the EU earn 17.5% less on average than men and there has only been a marginal reduction of the gender pay gap in the last few years; calls on the Member States to re-double their efforts to put European measures in place with the aim of closing this gap;
2012/01/09
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers the Union for the Mediterranean to have been misconceived, poorly executed and even counterproductive; insists, therefore, on the full incorporation of the European side of the partnership into the conventional EU framework under the auspices of the High Representative/Vice- President and the European External Action Service;deleted
2011/10/11
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 14 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should focus on economic and social reforms with employmentand reforms of education programmes, with job creation and promotion at the centre and labour standards as pre- requisites for financial support;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Actively supports the current process of relaunching the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) and the governance arrangements recently put in place; calls for UfM projects to receive more, and more targeted, financial input from the funds authorised under the ENP’s funding instruments;
2011/10/11
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 18 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Supports Parliament’s role in the ENP while noting the increased pressure on MEPs and Parliament’s services ofith regard to maintaining effectively the growing number of multilateral and bilateral forms of parliamentary cooperation; urges continual assessment of the added value and practical organisation of EuroNest and the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assemblynderlines that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EuroNest and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (PA-UfM), are crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence- building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves; emphasises the need for the PA-UfM to be recognised as the legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM;
2011/10/11
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 21 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that ENP should support states in their own efforts to tackle urgent labour-market issues such as supply- demand mismatches, informal employment and gender imbalances with the expertise and collaboration of the EU and the international organisations that deal with reforming labour markets and developing social policies;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of job creation but recalls the need toat the development and the close involvement of the private sector, notably small and medium-sized enterprises, are a key lever for job creation and a vital tool for copeing effectively with and preventing the illegal migration of the jobless;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need to continue the dialogue on support for access to the EU labour market, underlines the usefulness of controlled circular mobility for both the third countries and the EU, and asks for measures to avoid a potential brain drainprevent a potential brain drain; stresses, in particular, the need for better dissemination of information on the existing legal possibilities as regards mobility and migration, and on the opportunities for using the available competences that are necessary for the labour market;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to promote fully independentce of the social partners throughin terms of their creation and their development through various instruments including financial support, training, creation of networks and capacity-building measures;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to support administrationve capacity building in employment and social affairs, which will ensure better prepareation for and leading the reforms;
2011/09/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. StresseRegrets that the percentage of early school leavers in the EU currently stands at 14.4% and that 17.4% of these have only completed primary school;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out also that it is vital to bring down unemployment in the EU by meeting new occupational requirements and encouraging the recruitment of new blood to replace the old;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that a reduction to 10% of early school leavers in the EU, one of the headline targets of the EU 2020 Strategy, would have an effect in reducing youth unemployment and in improving the employment rate, since currently 52% of school leavers are unemployed; considers that reducing the early school leaving rate by only 1% could boost the number of qualified potential employees by 500 000;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes the long-term economic and social effects of early school leaving, leading to a lack of skilled labour force throughout the European economy, an increased risk of unemployment, poverty and social exclusion;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls, therefore, on the Member States to draw up policies as quickly as possible with a view to establishing new jobs based on new skills;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the Commission should present to the committeeParliament in a year’s time a survey, assessment and evaluation of national reform programmes, specifying the means established to tackle unemployment, for example apprenticeship, work-study programmes, professional mentoring, etc, and including employment projections by sector and skill level;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the challenge of early school leaving is different within and between the Member States, with large differences in early school leaving rates between the Member States; Urges the Member States to carry out an analysis of the problem of early school leaving, while taking due account of data protection, and to develop appropriate packages of measures for prevention, intervention and compensation;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Advocates flexible, needs-based forms of learning at schools and stresses that this challenge must be addressed in particular by primary schools and in the early years of secondary schooling; takes the view and that teaching staff should therefore be qualified for this purpose;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Takes the view that early school leavers should be approached by the competent employment authority as quickly as possible after dropping out of school to provide them with the necessary information about their options; notes the importance of giving them a perspective through individual support and to prevent a life of long-term unemployment and social exclusion;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Proposes, in the context of the 2012 EU budget, that a pilot project aimed atbe set up for the purpose of integrating early school leavers successfully into the labour market;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Encourages Member States to reduce early school leaving by exchange of experience and good practice on the national and European level;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2011/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Advocates the targeted deployment of the Structural Funds for early school leavers., in particular the European Social Fund (ESF), for early school leavers to promote their social inclusion under specific programmes in each Member State;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2011/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to include gender mainstreaming into all of its sports-related activities and to take concrete measures to ensure a balancedbetter representation of women and men (not lower than 30 % for both genders) at allat appropriate levels in sports decision- making levelbodies;
2011/08/31
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for Parliament to be fully involved in the European Semester in order to represent citizens’ interests and to increase the legitimacy of the social policies to be conducted by the Member States;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Wishes to see the role of the national parliaments strengthened with regard to their involvement in the process of economic and social policy-making so as to demonstrate their solidarity as partners in the European Semester; considers that this would serve to increase the legitimacy of the decisions taken and would ensure that the European Parliament is not the sole representative of the interests of European citizens and that strong political signals are sent at national level;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Council and the Commission, when providing policy guidance to Member States relating to education, employment and social affairs, macroeconomic policy and the budget, to respect the principles of subsidiarity and social dialogue in the field of wages and pensions as well and, in keeping with Article 153(5) TFEU, to respect the competences of the Member States and social partners in these areas;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for the Commission and Council recommendations to focus as a priority on a social policy that promotes education and training, access to employment, reintegration of the unemployed into the labour market and improved coordination of social protection systems in the Member States;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Declares its readiness to engage in a regular policy dialogue and exchange of views with relevant stakeholders, including the social partners and NGOs, on the employment and social aspects of Europe 2020 and the European Semester, and in this framework:(Does not affect English version.)
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point b
b) Encourages the Employment Committee (EMCO) toransparency among European Semester stakeholders, including the Employment Committee (EMCO), so as to ensure that it will regularly share the results of its employment surveillance with the responsible committee of the European Parliament,
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point c
c) Invites the social partners, social NGOs and other stakeholders to take part in a regular exchange of views with Parliament, in particular on the implementation of employment and social policies and on the progress towards achieving the related EU targets; requests that preparatory documents for exchanges of views be communicated in advance to the members of the appropriate parliamentary committee;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 f (new)
8f. Hopes that recommendations will be drawn up long enough in advance to have a real impact on national budgetary decisions.
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Article 2 and Article 3(3), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the European Union (TEU) and Article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 3 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 and 23,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 5 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 c (new)
- having regard to the European Pact for Gender Equality (2011-2020) adopted by the European Council in March 2011,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 7 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 d (new)
- having regard to the recommendation by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation (CM/Rec(2010) 5) and the recommendation (1915) and resolution (1728) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the same topic,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 e (new)
- having regard to the Commission's Communication on the Strategy for the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Union of 19.10.2010 COM(2010) 573 final,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 f (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe's Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence of 7 April 2011 (CM(2011)49 final),
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 11 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 1 g (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 5 April 2011 on priorities and outline of a new EU policy framework to fight violence against women1,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 13 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A
A. whereas the judicial authorities of Member States are independent and may determine their own interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 14 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A a (new)
A a. whereas the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon created a new situation in the EU in the field of human rights by making the Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding (Article 6 TEU),
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A b (new)
A b. whereas equality between men and women is recognised as a fundamental right by the Charter and all types of discrimination should be fought against,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 17 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph A c (new)
A c. whereas Gender Equality Directives require Member States to establish or designate equality bodies to promote equality, including providing independent assistance to victims of discrimination,
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 18 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Affirms the need to increase efforts at communicating that the scope of the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not apply to breaches of fundamental rights unless there is a connection to Union law and that only violations of peoples' rights by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and by the Member States when they are implementing EU law are covered;deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Affirms Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union founding the Union on a community of indivisible and universal values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, solidarity, the rule of law and respect for human rights, for all persons on the territory of the European Union, including those belonging to minorities;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Welcomes the first annual report of the Commission on the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental rights; welcomes the conclusions of the Council, especially on its commitment to fulfil EU ambitions on gender equality as mentioned in the Treaty;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Draws attention to the fact that although the Charter promotes the equality of men and women and in addition has specific provisions on the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under-represented sex, positive discrimination also creates victims and that it is essential to avoid all types of discrimination as it is morally wrong;deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Draws attention to the fact that although the Charter promotes the equality of men and women and in addition has specific provisions on the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under- represented sex, positive discrimination also creates victims and that it is essential to avoid all types of discrimination as it is morally wrong;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that Article 23 of the Charter states that "Equality between men and women must be ensured in all areas, including employment, work and pay; The principle of equality shall not prevent the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under-represented sex stresses that "this in no way undermines the rights of other under represented groups such as children (Article 24), the elderly (Article 25), persons with disabilities (Article 26); additionally highlights that Article 21 of the Charter clearly states the prohibition of any discrimination against others, persons with generic features, or based on sexual orientation;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Underlines that women are the main victims of gender based violence; points out that violence and the threat of violence constitute a breach one's right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity and a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence, underlines that the effects of such violence, being so widespread throughout the European Community, constitute a genuine fundamental rights violation and health scourge and an obstacle to the enjoyment of all people of safe, free and just citizenship;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Takes note of the Commission's victims package; regrets that violence against women is not adequately taken into account; calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive policy approach against gender based violence and to launch a Directive addressing combating and eliminating all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls in all EU Member States;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 39 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to make active use of civic bodies and relevant NGOs, such as women's organisations, as their expertise is invaluable to understand the most contentious issues and the situation of the most vulnerable groups in society, identify existing gaps, key trends and structural problems in the area of fundamental rights and to fully respect national cultures and diversity;deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 41 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. In order to avoid over-expectations and misunderstandings, calls on the Commission to inform better the citizens of their rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights but also about the scope of the Charter; recalls in this view the importance of the European e-justice Portal ; calls in addition on the Member States to increase awareness of the Charter among the civil society, through a continuous dialogue with relevant non- governmental organisations, and women's organizations in particular, as their expertise is invaluable with regards to stereotypes and discrimination since it is a fact through time, that women have been the most common and vulnerable victims;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights, in the context of fundamental rights and discrimination, the need to bear in mind that, hidden behind the veil of neutrality, the conceptual framework and the reasoning processes of law may perpetuate stereotypes and can underpin and maintain sexual difference instead of dismantling sex-based disadvantages;deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 50 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Highlights the need to support the alleviation of all stereotypes and discriminatory behaviours via special programs, actions and campaigns involving Member States, social partners , NGO’s, institutions and parliamentarians;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Requests that in its forthcoming annual reports on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union or in its accompanying documents, the Commission include specific data on how many women and how many men wrote the letters, questions and petitions receivdeleted;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Regrets the relatively poor quality of data collected by equality bodies in some Members States, lacking disaggregation by ground of discrimination such as sex and age, or by thematic area, such as employment and education ; recalls the important role of the Fundamental Rights Agency in the collection and analysis of objective, reliable and comparable data on a variety of fundamental rights issues in the European Union;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 57 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the Commission to better communicate on the type of complaints, letters, questions and petitions received from citizens concerning the application of the Charter; welcomes any concrete information on gender based discrimination complaints provided by the Commission to the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament for further analysis; requests that the Commission largely communicates its forthcoming annual reports on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union, so as to increase awareness of the need for actions to combat democratic deficits and breaches of fundamental rights;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 60 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for an audit of unfulfilled and outstanding pre-accession commitments that result in a breach of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by states that entered the EU in 2004 and 2007.deleted
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2011/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission to find effective ways to follow up breaches of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, outstanding issues and specific cases of violations of fundamental rights and to carry out occasional audits in all Member States to identify unfulfilled commitments;
2011/09/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 85 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the employment rate is closely linked to economic performance; strongly recommends that the Member States follow the guidelines for employment policies toge, accompanying therm with broad economic policy guidelines;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for better monitoring in each professional sector and according to qualification level of the upcoming skill demand in Europe and for an immediate transposition of the findings into education and the lifelong learning policies of the Member States; considers that a ‘knowledge alliance’ that brings together business and education institutions would be an useful instrument in addressing innovation and skills gaps;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets that the number of early school-leavers still remains high; calls on the Member States to implement more effective policies to prevent early school leaving and, to offer learning and training alternatives to students with learning difficulties and to develop effective links between initial training and the world of business;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages Member States to implement a dual system of education/training in order to introduce young people to the labour market from the earliest stage; furthermore, calls on relevant stakeholders to ensure that traineeships and apprenticeships, with the aid of supervision by professionalised tutors, lead to the provision of new jobs;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to stimulate creation of small and medium-sized enterprises, to provide them with a regulatory friendly environment and to improve their access to finance; recalls that 85% of jobs in the EU are provided by SMEs; urges all relevant stakeholders to remove barriers toall measures likely to hinder business creation and its free movement;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Urges continued adherence to the European programme of food aid for the most deprived as one of the elements of an ambitious integrated policy seeking to combat poverty, bearing in mind that women are frequently the first victims of food poverty;
2011/07/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 43 #

2011/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the evaluation at the biannual ministerial Round Table on 17 October, International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, to involve the citizens concerned and associations assisting the most deprived from a gender-specific perspective, taking the poorest groups as a reference;
2011/07/20
Committee: FEMM
Amendment L #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the creation of decent jobs through vocationalConsiders that a full and effective way out of poverty can only be found if the appropriate strengthening of social protection instruments is accompanied by significant reinforcement of education and training paths at every level; supports the development of more inclusive education systems to tackle the problem of students dropping out and enable young people from disadvantaged social groups to reach a higher level of education, with a view to countering the intergenerational transmission of poverty; supports access to validation of acquired experience and life-long training, and the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance, in particular for disadvantaged groups; s a means of reducing poverty by securing access to employment, in particular for disadvantaged groups, to help them to access decent jobs; regards it as essential, therefore, for life-long learning programmes to be implemented properly and developed, and for Member States to cooperate in the fields of education and vocational training and personalised job-seeking assistance, and stresses that more measures of this kind must be taken to assist the most vulnerable sectors of the population; recommends the development of an EU strategy to tackle in-work poverty and create quality jobs, agreeing principles for quality work;
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the creation of decent jobs through vocational training and the provision of personalised job-seeking assistance, in particular for disadvantaged groups; access to validation of acquired experience and life-long training, in particular for disadvantaged groups, to help them to access decent jobs; regards it as essential, therefore, for life- long learning programmes to be implemented properly and developed, and for Member States to cooperate in the fields of education and vocational training;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Supports the development of more inclusive education systems to tackle the problem of students dropping out and enable young people from disadvantaged social groups to reach a higher level of education, with a view to countering the intergenerational transmission of poverty;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas single-parent families do not form a homogeneous group, but cover a very wide range of family, financial and social situations,
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 54 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas career pressures are the highest between the ages of 25 and 40, when children are still young and require more care and time from their parents; whereas school and working hours are often incompatible with the opening hours of childcare centres and schools, which is often the biggest obstacle and constraint in combining family and professional life,
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 74 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages the development of online and interpersonal chat forums or telephone help lines aimed directly at single mothers in order to reduce their isolation and allow them to exchange views and best practices about their needs, along with the introduction of telephone help lines or freephone numbers making it easier to put them in contact with social services;
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 76 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the development of parental training courses to prepare and teach single mothers the best ways of dealing with the difficult job of raising a child as a single parent while providing the child with a balanced life rhythm;deleted
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 89 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to facilitate access to training for single mothers, and especially young mothers, who oftenthe importance of encouraging young pregnant women not to stop their education when pregnant; this would enable them to obtain qualifications and maximise their chances of getting high- quality work and gaining financial independence;
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 99 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to encourage the development of childcare facilities such as childcare centres and kindergartens and to facilitate significantly access to training and the search for employment for single mothers;
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 120 #

2011/2049(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Asks the Member States to guarantee equal treatment and to maintain a high quality of life for all children regardless of the marital status of their parents, by providing universalappropriate allowances in order to not pass poverty on to the child;
2011/06/07
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the purpose of cohesion policy is to foster the development of an innovative and protective Europe of solidarity in the face of the challenges associated with globalisation,
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas cohesion policy represents a genuine citizens’ issue, bringing Europe into people’s daily lives and making it tangible and visible across the EU,
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 32 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas territorial cooperation aims to help territories and regions work together in tackling their common challenges, reduce the physical, administrative and regulatory barriers to such cooperation and lessen the ‘border effect’,
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 48 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, however, a significant threshold effect exists between regions with comparable levels of development but benefiting from very different levels of aid – growth regions exceeding the threshold of 75% of average per capita GDP for the EU in receipt of more financial support than stagnating regions above that threshold – and whereas this represents a real problem in terms of fairness between Europe’s regions,
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Doubts whetherStresses that specific operational programmes for functional geographic, including multi-regional operational programmes, can yield additional benefits by meeting the shared chal lentitges of functional territories such as metropolitan regions or, sea or river basins will yield additional benefits; is particularly aware, in relor mountain regions; considers that, in accordance with the partnership principle, the implementation tof such programmes, of the absence of political bodies (including democratically elected bodies) with a sufficiently wide- ranging remit to implement them; calls instead is a shared responsibility which should be preserved; calls for closer coordination of macroregional or natural-environment strategies at inter-governmental levels;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 162 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the key role of towns and cities in achieving the economic, environmental and social EU 2020 objectives; encourages the dynamic process launched during the previous programming period for Integrated Urban Programmes and stresses the importance of the experiments currently under way; calls for support for ideas and projects which can serve as models, on the basis of integrated development plans, and for the upgrading of urban-rural links;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 227 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that the core components of the EU 2020 strategy (innovation, education and training, energy, environment, employment, competitiveness, skills and combating poverty) are already integral to the cohesion and structural policies; takes the view that the EU 2020 challenges can be integrated very easily into the system of three objectives (Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment, and European Territorial Cooperation), which has proved its effectivenessarchitecture of the cohesion policy;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 260 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for a dependable and appropriate phasing-out arrangement for areas formerly eligible for maximum support underthe creation of a new intermediate category for regions with per capita GDP between 75% and 90% of the EU average, in order to resolve political problems (unequal treatment of regions in spite of their similar situations) and practical problems (difficulty of managing degressive funding) linked to the current phasing-out arrangement; considers that the creation of such a category will be made possible by the fact that a large number of regions have passed the threshold of 75% of the EU average per capita GDP and will thus automatically cease to be covered by the convergence objective; stresses that this change to the architecture of the cohesion policy should neither penalise regions currently benefiting from the Cconvergence objective (convergence regions)and the competitiveness objective, nor lead to an increase in the cohesion policy budget; considers that this new category will make it possible to strengthen the justice and solidarity which are the fundamental principles of the cohesion policy;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 277 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that a general new funding category based on GDP/PE between the 75% and 90% rates would be at odds with the tried and tested principles of EU cohesion policy (to support the weakest and pool the inherent potential of the wealthier regions, taking a cross- cutting approach), and therefore rejects this intermediate category;deleted
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 499 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Calls, in respect of Member States that are falling significantly short of the EU stability criteria requirements and also have a poor record on the use of monies from the structural funds, for a proposal for the automatic application of more stringent rules in order to monitor the use of such monies in accordance with the law and the relevant objectives; calls, at the same time, for unnecessary controls to be done away with in those Member States that have a satisfactory fund management system; considers that the ‘contract of confidence’ and ‘single audit’ principles should be implemented wherever possible;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 525 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54 a (new)
54a. Is concerned at the fact that red tape is preventing small companies and organisations from gaining access to structural funding; calls for the relevant rules and technical documentation to be made as clear as possible, and asks the Commission and the Member States to set up technical working parties with a view to identifying appropriate simplification measures;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Reminds the Member States to make use of the funds available under the European Social Fund to promote gender equality and calls for genuine budgetary transparency in the case of the funds allocated to equality policies for women and men (ESF, PROGRESS, DAPHNE);
2011/05/04
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Directive 2005/36/EC should also cover notaries. For recognition requests for establishment, Member States should be able to impose the necessary aptitude test or adaptation period to avoid any discrimination in the national selection and nomination procedures. In the case of free provision of services, notaries should not be able to draw up authentic instruments and carry out other activities of authentication which require the seal of the host Member State.deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2Directive 2005/36/EC
This Directive shall not apply to notaries appointed by an official act of government.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point bDirective 2005/36/EC

Article 5 – paragraph 4
b) The following paragraph 4 is added: "4. In the case of notaries, the authentic instruments and other activities of authentication which require the seal of the host Member State shall be excluded from the provision of services."deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point cDirective 2005/36/EC

Article 14 – paragraph 3
c) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is inserted after the first subparagraph: "For the profession of notary, the host Member State may, when it determines the compensation measure, take into account the specific activities of this profession on its territory, in particular as regards the law to be applied.".deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) ensuring the economic competitiveness of the European Union and its partner countries by including projects and procedures that best suit SMEs, thereby helping them integrate better into the European Union’s internal market.
2012/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) coordinating EU support for SMEs, and promoting the creation of businesses between SMEs in partner countries and in the Union; encouraging development of SME projects and investments in partner countries, thereby releasing the resources needed to promote transnational cooperation.
2012/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) At its meeting of 4 February 2011, the European Council supported the concept of the Common Strategic Framework for Union Research and Innovation funding to improve the efficiency of research and innovation funding at national and Union levels and called on the Union to rapidly address remaining obstacles to attracting talented women and men and investment in order to complete the ERA by 2014 and achieve a genuine single market for knowledge, research and innovation.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) Awareness-raising and information programmes should be organised in schools with a view to encouraging girls to become interested in scientific professions, which are still too often dominated by boys.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 19 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Horizon 2020 should contribute to the attractiveness of the research profession in the Union. Adequate attention should be paid to the European Charter for Researchers and Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Male and Female Researchers, together with other relevant reference frameworks defined in the context of the European Research Area, while respecting their voluntary nature.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 25 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Horizon 2020 should seek to strike a fair funding balance between scientific projects conducted by female and male researchers.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Due care shall be taken to guarantee the balanced representation of women and men on the groups of independent experts and high-level advisory groups set up by the Commission.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 45 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Horizon 2020 shall ensure the effective promotion of gender equality and the gender dimension in research and innovation content by facilitating women’s access to scientific education and professions, thereby creating better career prospects for them in all areas of research and innovation.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 53 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In the context of Horizon 2020, particular attention shall be paid to compliance with the principles of professional equality, equal pay and equal career opportunities. With that aim in view, workers’ representatives in undertakings which are in receipt of EU funding shall be consulted each year about the situation with regard to gender equality and possible remedies in cases where imbalances have arisen. In addition, should instances of inequality persist, and after the undertaking has been reminded of its obligations, the financial assistance referred to above may be withdrawn.
2012/06/27
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 570 #

2011/0371(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point c – point ii a (new)
(iia) the Euro-Mediterranean University (EMUNI University).
2012/10/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 57 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to promote the effective implementation of the principles of non- discrimination on the grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or, sexual orientation, family situation or pregnancy, including equality between women and men and the rights of persons with disabilities and of the elderly;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) to facilitate by means of quick and simple procedures litigation in the event that the principles of non-discrimination are not respected;
2012/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 91 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) From conception to implementation, the Structural Funds ought to take account of the priorities and principles of the Small Business Act for Europe, especially the ‘Think Small First’ principle.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) For the Partnership Contract and each programme respectively, a Member State should organise a partnership with the representatives of competent regional, local, urban and other public authorities, economic and social partners, and bodies representing civil society, including environmental partners, non-governmental organisations, and bodies responsible for promoting equality and non-discrimination. The purpose of such a partnership is to respect the principle of multi-level governance, ensure the ownership of planned interventions by stakeholders and build on the experience and know-how of relevant actors. The Commission should be empowered to adopt, after consulting the European social partners, delegated acts providing for a code of conduct in order to ensure that partners are involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of Partnership Contracts and programmes in a consistent manner.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) For the purpose of ensuring a wide dissemination of information about the achievements of the Funds and the role of the Union therein and, in particular via the organisations representing the various stakeholders, to inform potential beneficiaries about funding opportunities, detailed rules about information and communication measures, as well as certain technical characteristics of such measures, should be defined in this Regulation.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the Partnership Contract and each programme respectively, a Member States and regional authorities shall organise a partnership with the following partners:
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) competent regional, local, urban and otherother relevant public authorities;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 142 to provide, after consulting the European economic and social partners and European partner organisations, for a European code of conduct that lays down objectives and criteria to support the implementation of partnership and to facilitate the sharing of information, experience, results and good practices among Member States.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) enhancing the competitiveness of small and, medium-sized and micro-enterprises, as well as self-employed people, the agricultural sector (for the EAFRD) and the fisheries and aquaculture sector (for the EMFF);
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) investing in education, skills, vocational training and lifelong learning;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration, in cooperation with the European economic and social partners and European partner organisations.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
TIn cooperation with the European economic and social partners, the Common Strategic Framework shall establish:
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The implementation of multi-fund programmes (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion, EAFRD, EMFF) is strongly encouraged. To this end, the Commission shall take any measures necessary to ensure that such programmes are prepared and implemented in line with the principle of Fund proportionality.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Local development strategies shall be selected by a committee on which the economic and social partners are represented, set up for this purpose by the relevant managing authorities of the programmes.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 43 – paragraph 4
4. The monitoring committee may issue recommendations to the managing authority regarding implementation of the programme and its evaluation in order to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiaries. It shall monitor actions taken as a result of its recommendations.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. Annual implementation reports shall set out information on implementation of the programme and its priorities by reference to the financial data, common and programme-specific indicators and quantified target values, including changes in result indicators, and the milestones defined in the performance framework. The data transmitted shall relate to values for indicators for fully implemented operations and also for selected operations. They shall also set out actions taken to fulfil the ex ante conditionalities and, simplify administrative procedures and address any issues which affect the performance of the programme, and the corrective measures taken.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 52 – paragraph 1
1. At the initiative of a Member State, the CSF Funds may support actions for preparation, management, monitoring, evaluation, information and communication, networking, complaint resolution, and control and audit. The CSF Funds may be used by the Member State to support actions for the reduction of administrative burden for beneficiaries, including electronic data exchange systems, and actions to reinforce the capacity of Member State authorities, economic and social partners and beneficiaries to administer and use the CSF Funds. These actions may concern preceding and subsequent programming periods.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The European Council of 17 June 2010 called for all common policies, including cohesion policy, to support the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth". In order to ensure the full alignment of the ESF with the objectives of this strategy, particularly as regards employment, education, and the fight against social exclusion, the ESF should support Member States in implementing the Council recommendations on broad guidelines for economic policies of the Member States and the Union and the Council decisions on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States adopted in accordance with Articles 121 and 148(4) of the Treaty. It should also contribute to the implementation of the flagship initiatives, with special regard to the "Agenda for New Skills and Jobs", "Youth on the Move", and the "European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion". It willshould also support the activities in the "Digital Agenda" and the "Innovation Union" initiatives.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The ESF shall promote high levels of employment and job quality, support the geographical and occupational mobility of workers, and facilitate theiworker adaptation to change, encourage a high level of es to the businesses and producation and training, promote gender equality, equal opportunities and non- discrimination, enhancesystems. The ESF will also contribute to the strengthening of economic, social and territorial cohesion in the Union, the fight against poverty and social inexclusion and combat poverty, thereby contributing to the priorities of the European Union as regards strengthening economic, social and territorial cohes, promote gender equality, equal opportunities and elimination of any form of discrimination.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 92 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF shall benefit people, including disadvantaged groups such as the long- term unemployed, people with disabilities, migrants, ethnic minorities, marginalised communities and people facing social exclusion. The ESF shall also provide support to workers, enterprises, and entrepreneurs as well as systems and structures with a view to facilitating their adaptation to new challenges and promoting good governance and the implementation of reforms, in particular in the fields of employment, education and social policies.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 97 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF depends on good governance and partnership between all relevant territorial and socio- economic actors, in particular the social partners and non-governmental organisations. It is therefore necessary that Member States encourage the participation of social partners and non-governmental organisations in the implementation of the ESF, particularly in the field of education, to enable training to be tailored more closely to the needs of the regional, national and European job market.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF depends on good governance and partnership between all relevant territorial and socio- economic actors, in particular the social partners, organised civil society, business organisations and non-governmental organisations. It is therefore necessary that Member States encourage the participation of social partners and non-governmental organisations in the implementation of the ESF.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Support for social innovation is crucial for making policies more responsive to social change and to promote corporate social responsibility and encourage and support innovative social enterprises, including SMEs. In particular, testing and evaluating innovative solutions before scaling them up is instrumental in improving the efficiency of the policies and thus justifies specific support from the ESF.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) Adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change, specifically in SMEs and micro-enterprises;
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 116 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The mobilisation of regional and local stakeholders is necessary to deliver the Europe 2020 Strategy and its headline targets. Territorial pacts, local initiatives for employment and social inclusion, community-led local development strategies and sustainable urban development strategies mayshould be used and supported to involve more actively regional and local authorities, cities, social partners and non-governmental organisations in the implementation of programmes.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Human capital is the main lever on which the Union can rely to ensure its international competitiveness and the sustainable recovery of its economy. No other type of investment can produce structural reforms unless it is accompanied by a coherent, growth- oriented human capital development strategy. It is therefore necessary to ensure that the resources intended to improve skills, raise employment levels and guarantee the participation of all in society allow action to be taken on an adequate scale, using a minimum of 25% of the funds deployed under the Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion policy.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iii a) Better and fairer access to contracts by professional groups and countries in order to be closer to real needs;
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 154 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF shall benefit people, including disadvantaged groups such as the long- term unemployed, young people who have left school without acquiring any qualifications, people with disabilities, migrants, ethnic minorities, marginalised communities and people facing social exclusion. The ESF shall also provide support to enterprises, systems and structures with a view to facilitating their adaptation to new challenges and promoting good governance and the implementation of reforms, in particular in the fields of employment, education and social policies.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
i) Access to employment for job-seekers and inactive people, including local employment initiatives and support for labour mobilityvocational guidance, labour mobility and retraining;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
ii) Sustainable integration of young people – particularly those who are not in employment, education or training into the labour market;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
iii) Self-employment, entrepreneurship and business creationthe creation, continuous development and transfer of businesses, particularly small and micro-enterprises;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv
iv) Equality between men and women in terms of access to employment, in-service training and career progression, particularly with a view to tackling the problem of women’s careers ‘flat-lining’, and reconciliation between work and private life;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
v) Adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change, with particular reference to SMEs and micro-enterprises;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vi
vi) Active and healthyImprovement of the quality of employment, working conditions, the working environment and health at work, and support for workers with a view to promoting active ageing;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) Under the thematic objective ‘Investing in education, vocational training, skills, and life- long learning through:
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) Investing in education, developing or updating relevant skills and life- long learning through:
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
ii) Improving the quality, efficiency and openness of vocational training, tertiary and equivalent education with a view to increasing participation and attainment levels;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. To encourage adequate participation of and access by non-governmental organisations to actions supported by the ESF, particularly with measures of impact, notably in the fields of social inclusion, gender equality and equal opportunities, the managing authorities of an operational programme in a region as defined in Article 82(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No […] or in Member States eligible for Cohesion Fund support shall ensure that an appropriate amount of ESF resources is allocated to capacity-building for non-governmental organisations.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 223 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) Enhancing fairer access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systemsaccreditation of experiential learning, particularly for people working as volunteers, and upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce, including with a view to offering workers opportunities for active ageing;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems, including through the creation of partnerships between educational and training establishments and businesses;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills, knowledge, qualifications and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems, as well as mechanisms to facilitate the transition from education to professional training and employment;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 234 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia ) a forward-looking approach to professions and training needs and enhanced, fairer access to contracts by professional field and territory, in order to meet real needs more effectively;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) Eenhancing access to affordable, sustainable and high-quality services, including health care and, specifically, the creation of European platforms and pilot projects to increase awareness of e-health initiatives (telemedicine, telemonitoring), and social services of general interest;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) Ppromoting the social economy and, social enterprises and CSR, including through the creation of a social label;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) Capacity building for stakeholders, in particular the partners referred to in Article 5 of the General Regulation, delivering social, employment, education and socialprofessional, further and lifelong training policies and sectoral and territorial pacts to mobilise for reform at national, regional and local level.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 277 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii a (new)
(iia) strengthening the institutional capacities of the partners referred to in Article 5 of the General Regulation and supporting actions aimed at implementing the Regulation;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) Supporting the shift towards a low- carbon, climate-resilient, resource-efficient and environmentally sustainable economy, through reform of education and training systems, adaptation of behaviour, skills and qualifications, up-skilling of the labour force, and the creation of new jobs in sectors related to the environment and energy;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Strengthening research, technological development and innovation, through the development of post-graduate studies and business skills, the training of researchers, networking activities and partnerships between higher education institutions, research and technological centres and enterprises;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) Enhancing the competitiveness and long-term development of small and medium-sized enterprises, through promoting the adaptability of enterprises, senior managers and workers and increased investment in human capital, including training for young people and learning schemes.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) For more developed regions, Member States shall concentrate 80 % of the ESF allocation to each operational programme on up to four of the investment priorities set out in Article 3(1)., or up to 10 in response to specific territorial needs, provided that they are defined in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 5;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) For transition regions, Member States shall concentrate 70 % of the ESF allocation to each operational programme on up to four of the investment priorities set out in Article 3(1). , or up to 10 in response to specific territorial needs, provided that they are defined in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 5;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) For less developed regions, Member States shall concentrate 60 % of the ESF allocation to each operational programme on up to four of the investment priorities set out in Article 3(1). , or up to 10 in response to specific territorial needs, provided that they are defined in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 5;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 362 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall facilitate capacity building for social innovation, in particular through supporting mutual learning, establishing networks, and disseminating good practices and methodologies, including as regards common criteria for the award of social labels to enterprises.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 400 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Grants reimbursed on the basis of the eligible cost of operations, determined in the way of flat-rate financing, standard scales of unit costs and lump sums as referred to in Article 57(1) of Regulation (EU) No […] may be calculated on a case- by-case basis by reference to a draft budget agreed ex ante by the Managing Authority, where the public supportamount co-financed by the Union does not exceed EUR 100 000.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 403 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Grants for which the public supportamount co- financed by the Union does not exceed EUR 50 000 shall take the form of lump sums or standard scales of unit costs in accordance with paragraph 1 or Article 57 of Regulation (EU) No […], except for operations receiving support within the framework of a state aid scheme.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘direct effect’: effect on the human body directly provoked by the presence of a strong magnetic or electric field, for example, at certain frequency levels, the stimulation of muscles, nerves or sensitory organs, tissue heating, vertigo or headachesnausea;
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1a (new)
In order to develop a sound applicable methodology, to provide adequate protection for people working with and/or in proximity to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment with time- varying electromagnetic fields (the gradients and RF) in operation, and to take due account of existing precautionary and protection measures against exposure to electromagnetic fields, employers shall perform risk assessments and take appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect workers against potential risks arising directly or indirectly from exposure to electromagnetic fields. Workers shall only be permitted to be in proximity to MRI equipment with time- varying electromagnetic fields (gradients and RF) in operation when performing actions which strictly necessitate their presence. Employers shall define a controlled access zone around the machinery. This zone shall be fully contained within the 0.5 mT contour and shall be defined in such a way that it is possible to use physical and/or administrative means to control access thereto. Employers shall establish technical, organisational, information and training measures for workers who can enter the controlled access zone without surveillance, so as to reduce the risks of direct and indirect exposure and prevent risks.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) any effects concerning the health and safety of workers at particular risk such as workers who have declared to the employer that they wear an Active or Passive Implanted Medical Device (e.g. a pacemaker), that they are equipped with portable medical devices (such as insulin pumps) and women who have declared that they are pregnant;
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Taking account of technical progress and the availability of measures to control the production of electromagnetic fields at the source, therisks linked to exposure to electromagnetic fields shall be eliminated or reduced to a minimum.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) appropriate delimitation and access measures (such as signals, labels, floor markings, fences) to notify workers and to limit or control access;
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
c b) measures and procedures to manage spark discharges through technical means and the training of workers (applies in electric field exposures);
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. In any event, workers shall not be exposed above the exposure limit values for health effects unless the conditions under Article 3(6) are fulfilled. If, despite the measures taken by the employer to comply with this Directive, the exposure limit values for health effects are exceeded, the employer shall take immediate action to reduce exposure below these exposure limit values. The employer shall identify the reasons why the exposure limit values for health effects have been exceeded, and shall amend the protection and prevention measures accordingly, taking care to ensure the changes are traceable, in order to prevent them being exceeded again.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Pursuant to Article 15 of Directive 89/391/EEC, the employer shall adapt the measures referred to in this Article and in Annexes II and III to the requirements of workers at particular risk, particularly workers who have declared to the employer that they wear an implantable or portable medical device and women who have declared that they are pregnant.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – point b a (new)
(ba) possible indirect effects of exposure;
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14
TWithout prejudice to the report to be established in accordance towith Article 17(a) of Directive 89/391/EEC, the Commission shall draft a specific report within five years from … [the date of entry into force of this Directive]. This specific report shall notably report on the effectiveness of the Exposure Directive in reducing exposure to electromagnetic fields and the percentage of workplaces that required corrective action.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2011/0152(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part C – point 1 – point 10 – point 1
· rail transport powered by alternating current (50 Hz, 16.7 Hz)
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2010/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the future ESF contributes to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy in the fields of employment and social policy as an efficient, simple and user friendly instrument that is brought to bear to develop human capital;
2011/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States, on the basis of clear rules, to use the possibility of advance payments to ESF beneficiaries to a greater extent;
2011/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2010/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on Member States to embrace national educational concepts forto raise girls’ awareness of entrepreneurship and women in management and develop ‘young entrepreneurship’ in upper secondary schools so that, over the course of a school year, female students can experience the lifecycle of a business through the start-up, running and winding up of a company, linking to this process mentoring from teachers and ‘active ageing’ advisors from the local business community;
2011/03/30
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 8 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
(Aa) whereas the right to live and work in another country of the Union is one of the Union's fundamental freedoms, a basic component of Union citizenship recognized by the Treaties, yet according to statistics and notwithstanding specific initiatives to support workers' mobility, there are still too few people taking advantage of this right,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
(Ba) whereas the free movement of workers represents a positive socio- economic example for both the EU and the Member States, being a milestone for EU integration, economic development, social cohesion, individual upgrading at professional level, fighting against prejudices, racism and xenophobia, and can counteract the negative effects of economic crisis and better prepare for the challenges of global change, by engaging all stakeholders at decisional level together with the civil society into dialog,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
(Bb) whereas promoting mobility of workers is a positive contribution to reaching the employment objectives set in the Europe 2020 Strategy; invites the Commission to include labour mobility in the flagship initiatives and the Member States to include labour and geographical mobility dimensions when designing their National strategies and reform programs;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
(Ca) whereas the recent evolution of our societies notably due to industrial change, globalization, new work patterns, demographic change, and the development of means of transport, call for a higher degree of mobility among workers,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
(Ea) whereas in times of economic crisis professional and geographical mobility of workers can help reduce unemployment by matching labour supply with demand, can contribute to job creation opportunities, to adapting the economy, the society and the demography to structural changes, and to promoting economic growth and EU's competitiveness,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to produce a scoreboard presenting the obstacles faced by Union workers wishing to make use of their right to free movement and how they are being tackled in the Member States, so as to assess whether such obstacles are dealt with thoroughly and effectively;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Congratulates the Commission to linking workers' mobility with the Europe 2020 Strategy and takes the view that this is of crucial importance to boost welfare within the EU through sound and sustainable job creation;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on a greater coordination between the European Institutions and the national ones to better inform and provide assistance to the citizens and monitor how the right of free movement of workers is being transposed into practice and used by individuals in order to accelerate the implementation of labour mobility;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Invites border regions to consider agreements for promoting cross-border labour mobility in order to gain mutual (beneficial) advantages for these regions;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Encourages the Commission to pursue its initiatives aimed at promoting the geographical mobility of young people through learning mobility schemes, using all the designated programs related to the topic;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the Commission's plan to establish a regular systematic assessment of long-term supply and demand in the EU labour markets up to 2020, broken down by sectors, occupations, levels of qualification and countries, and strongly advises the coordination of labour and educational policies between Member States with a view to meeting the targets set in the EU 2020 Strategy regarding job creation and avoiding future indirect barriers that may hinder the exercise of the right of free movement; The plan should clearly identify labour shortages in the EU in the short, medium and long term;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for developing EURES' institutional capabilities and its reinforcement of the one-stop instrument to facilitate mobility of workers and their families;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses that, when promoting active employment policies, information about learning and training programmes available across the EU they should be given a high priority;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Calls for greater dialog and coordination among national and regional authorities as they are usually the first source of information for many citizens due to their proximity and knowledge of citizens needs, and greater involvement of the social partners;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls on the Commission to launch a communication regarding taxation effects on the workers comprised in the scope of this directive, for providing a better understanding and possible solutions to crucial matters that can impede or deter workers mobility;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Takes the view that active labour market policies, and in particular vocational training and life-long learning, must be reinforced as they can contribute to increasing labour mobility, facilitate transitions in times of structural unemployment, and allowing workers to adapt to labour market changes;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that skills and knowledge will foster workers' mobility, and requests the Commission to develop a roadmap for demands for skills and a mid- and long- term assessment regarding future jobs where a match between demand and supply of skills can be provided;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Considers that labour mobility is a two-way process; On the one hand, it leads to gathering skills and knowledge through all types of education in order to prepare the active population facing competition when searching for a new job and on the other hand, mobile workers can upgrade their skills and knowledge through labour mobility as they gather more practical experience and knowledge on the new site;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Hopes too that the new competences acquired by mobile workers as they move around will be validated so that their increased individual potential will be recognised and their chances of long-term professional inclusion improved;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – indent 1
– social inclusion of 80 million disabled people in the European Union, particularly women facing dual discrimination on grounds of gender and disability, and facilitating the work of their carers, particularlymost of whom are women;,
2011/05/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 10 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new)
– collecting detailed and reliable statistics on the real situation facing disabled people that cover the gender and disability dimension,
2011/05/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 16 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the need to educate health professionals and teachers as part of their training and to make parents and teachers aware of all types of disability, some of which are poorly understood despite their prevalence;
2011/05/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 20 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines the need to encourage recognition by the Member States in their social security systems, and when people retire, of the involvement, generally of women, in care for the disabled;
2011/05/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 34 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the difficulties disabled women face in gaining access to employment, and adds that they should be encouraged to follow study courses and use new information and communication technologies, while enterprises should be urged to employ them., and that Member States in particular should be encouraged to adopt policies on access to information tailored to different disabilities;
2011/05/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 224 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Confirms that inclusive education should be the focus, in particular in the context of the accreditation of prior experiential learning, and that this should therefore be emphasised within the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’) as well as the Skills and Jobs Flagship of EU2020. In addition, there is a need for new and suitable guidelines and proper usage of IT in schools and at home with regard to personal and tailored assistance;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas people are entering the labour force at a later age due to unemployment rates that particularly affect poorly qualified young people, or due to longer and higher education, and on average people leave the labour market earlier than the legal pension age, and longevity is increasing,
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the pauperisation concerns more often retired people than workers and more often women than meretired people are at risk of pauperisation, and whereas the elderly women are one of the most vulnerable groups at risk of poverty,
2010/11/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the period spent by women or men on taking care of children or other dependent family members should be taken into account and recognised in the calculation systems and taken into account to the period of work as well as all kind of contracof pension entitlements;
2010/11/11
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 59 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Sorely misses any mention ofConsiders that SMEs, which are one of the main sources of employment in the EU and can, must and wish, will continue to make a major contribution to the sustainability and adequacy of pension systems; wishes therefore to see the adoption of measures tailored to employees working in SMEs, particularly on assistance for combining work and retirement;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that long-term investment in pension systems requires a positive approach as part of economic governance and more particularly in the Stability and Growth Pact; calls on the competent bodies in the Member States to promote social inclusion and combat undeclared work in order to improve the balance of pension systems;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that the Green Paper does not devote any attention to the gender issue, particularly bearing in mind that, because of disparities in careers, women have smaller pensions on average; wants specific attention to therefore be paid to the situation of women and in particular to considering maternity leave as time actually worked providing entitlement to retirement benefits;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that Member States are themselves responsible for making adequate pension provision for their citizens as part of their social and economic policies and that those Member States should be encouraged to put in place a minimum old-age pension for all, putting the emphasis on those who are most vulnerable, especially disabled people;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that Member States are themselves responsible for making adequate pension provision for their citizens as part of their social and economic policies, and to choose the system that seems to them the most appropriate of the models currently available in Europe;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that, within the diversity of pension systems, the general systems (first pillar) combined with voluntary or compulsory savings- or work-related systems (second and third pillars) afford the best guarantee of adequate pension provision;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Is absolutely convinced that the Member States’ governments have an obligation to use all the means at their disposal to safeguard the long-term funding and sustainability of the main pillar of retirement schemes, namely the first pillar based on the compulsory contribution paid to the State;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Is persuaded that in view of the different features of existing retirement schemes in Europe the first pillar managed by the State and the third pillar based on the supplementary and voluntary aspect (and on savings by individuals) complement each other effectively, represent the main common denominator in the range of diversified systems existing in Europe and thus represent the basis for a ‘European model’ pension scheme, which any Member State is free to supplement with other elements and develop as it sees fit, in accordance with the particular features of its own economic and social environment;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Takes the view, with regard to the experience of recent decades, that work- related retirement schemes – whether compulsory or voluntary in nature – have not and cannot play more than a secondary role in the vast majority of Member States compared to the first pillar; considers, therefore, that solutions for securing the long-term funding of the first pillar must take absolute priority and that it would be inadvisable at present, before such solutions have been identified, to launch a European debate on promoting work-related retirement schemes in Member States which do not yet have that pillar;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that national budgets are under severe pressure and that many Member States are reviewing the efficiency of expenditure; calls on Member States to consider introducing compensation so that all taxpayers who cannot achieve the level of ambition in the first and second pillars are entitled to a supplementary offset of pension contributions in the second pillar or of contributions to private pension schemes in the third pillar; notes that this could also help Member States to establish a three-pillar structure;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that, in view of demographic trends and the need to ensure that pensions can be paid for, it is necessary for more people to participate in the labour market and to do so for longer; observes that life expectancy is growing and calls on Member States to consider linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy; however, calls on the Member States which have increased the statutory retirement age or will be doing so to encourage work by older people through fiscal and social security exemptions; also calls on the Member States to create adapted and flexible employment contracts for older people so as to encourage and facilitate combining work with retirement and put in place dissuasive measures so that companies find it harder to make older people redundant;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that, for older employees performing physically and/or mentally demanding work during or towards the end of their career, a labour market geared to flexibility and security must offer creative solutions such as greater flexibility in the statutory retirement age, part-time pensions or adapted working conditions, with the emphasis on ability to work, promoting transitional measures and versatility to enable people to transfer from one job to another, with the effective support of lifelong learning programmes, to strike a lasting balance between the requirements of employment and the capacities of workers; considers there to be a need for an active policy to prevent discrimination on grounds of age;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Considers that there is a need to reinforce mutual recognition between the Member States of training courses which could improve the match between supply and demand on the job market at European level, thus helping to meet the EU 2020 strategy target of a 75% employment rate;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 315 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Member States to put measures in place to protect workers' health and safety at work as soon as they enter the job market;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses the growing importance of labour-market mobility in the EU, as well as the need for such mobility; calls for further improvements to be made with regard to the conditions for carrying out cross-border activities, particularly concerning the harmonisation of tax and social security rules;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Considers therefore that there is a need to improve information and advice to members of pension schemes by setting up, where needed, one-stop-shops to give an efficient and precise response to the requests of those who have worked in several Member States;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in many Member States the importance of second-pillar pension provision linked to a profession has been recognised, and that it must also be ensured that such provision meets European conditions and criteria applicable to second-pillar provision;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers that the second pillar must bein Member States which have set up compulsory pension schemes linked to a profession, it would be advisable to make this second pillar available to all employees by right, without any discrimination on grounds of sex, sector and/or employment contract;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 395 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to investigate how employees’ right to participate in the second pillar can be facilitated and to make proposals for developing such a pillar where it does not yet exist;deleted
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 420 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. SWith a view to ensuring that pensions are portable, supports the establishment of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA); stresses the need to equip it so that it can perform effectively the tasks entrusted to it;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 439 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Points out that complementary pension schemes which are capitalised are often considered as difficult to access because they are too technically complex; considers that if employers and employees are to be encouraged to join such schemes, not only must their management be improved, but also their rules must be simplified, and at least better information should be provided, by standardising it on a common basis to make it more intelligible; considers that there should be more rules for capitalisation systems, which should be more tightly regulated on a voluntary basis, ensuring monitoring and transparency, supervision and improvement of the solvency of capitalisation systems; considers that legislative changes could be made, particularly with regard to solvency rules;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for training by means of apprenticeships to be assigned priority over any other type of training, e.g. traineeships; encourages Member States not to plan any university courses of a vocational nature which are not accompanied by an apprenticeship contract;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2010/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for apprenticeship contracts, while protecting the apprentice and providing for a certain flexibility and flexible measures for their application, to permit termination of the contract if the person concerned proves unsuited to his employment or is guilty of serious misconduct;
2010/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2010/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas violence is a way of denying fundamental rights and endangering the future and is a traumatic experience for any man, woman or child, butand whereas gender-based violence is preponderantly inflicted by men on women and girls, and both reflects and reinforces inequities between men and women and compromises the health, dignity, security and autonomy of its victims, but men are also victims of violence, particularly of the emotional variety,
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 102 #

2010/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 8 a (new)
– the establishment of programmes to prevent violence for the benefit of children who have witnessed violence against their mothers, in order to prevent reproduction of violent behaviour;
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 164 #

2010/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that civil society, particularly NGOs, women’s associations and other public and private voluntary organisations providing support to victims of violence, offers a service of great value, particularly by assisting women victims who wish to break the silence in which violence encloses them, and should be given support by the Member States;
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 178 #

2010/2209(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises that Member States should devote appropriate resources to preventing and combating violence against women, which should particularly be allocated to support organisations, including through recourse to the Structural Funds;
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 27 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 2
2. Underlines that financing for the European Social Fund should be significantly increased in order to provide adequate resources for measures and activities under the Social Inclusion Strategy and the ‘Europe 2020’ flagship initiative on combating poverty and social exclusion, through integration into the employment market via training, and social exclusion; considers that women must receive particular support, as they are most faced with insecure contracts; stresses that they are often alone in educating their children in the majority of cases of single-parent families;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need to reduce the pay gap between men and women which cause those with equal skills and equal jobs to fall behind in terms of income and which result in a high rate of women experiencing poverty when they retire or are widowed;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that older women may be the victims of direct or indirect discrimination on the labour market, or even of multiple discrimination, and that this problem should be tackled; stresses that employment must be seen as the best means of fighting female poverty; calls for the participation of women of all ages in lifelong training programmes to be facilitated; emphasises that reconciling family and working life and continuing training requires special attention and support;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 4
4. Takes note of the Council’s decision of 17 June 2010 to leave it up to Member States to set their national targets for reducing the number of people at risk of poverty and exclusion on the basis of one or several of the three indicators agreed upon by the Council; considers that Member States using only the ‘jobless household’ indicator may systematically neglect problems such as in-work poverty, energy poverty, child poverty and social exclusion; stresses that school and university education for women must be a priority target in connection with which each Member State must set targets;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 4
4. Takes note of the Council’s decision of 17 June 2010 to leave it up to Member States to set, in cooperation with the regions, their national targets for reducing the number of people at risk of poverty and exclusion on the basis of one or several of the three indicators agreed upon by the Council; considers that Member States using only the ‘jobless household’ indicator may systematically neglect problems such as in-work poverty, energy poverty, child poverty and social exclusion;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5
5. Points out that social protection and social policy make important contributions to lessening the depth and duration of the recession by stabilising labour markets and consumption, and that the social protection system is a stabiliser on both the revenue and the expenditure side.; calls, in the interests of not adding to the insecurity experienced by women on the employment market, for family responsibilities to be taken into account when selecting employees for dismissal, bearing in mind that in many situations women have charge of children; calls for accessibility to be improved, in particular through financial support for childcare, thus making it easier for the most disadvantaged women to pursue their occupation;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2010/2162(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States, where necessary, to re-examine welfare systems in order to avoid the considerable inequalities between women’s and men’s pension levels, and consider the options of introducing corrective factors taking account of the gaps in contributions arising from insecure employment or maternal responsibilities;
2010/10/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States for specific programmes to promote the active inclusion or reintegration of women on the labour market and for specific training with a view to providing the skills and qualifications needed in the light of the EU 2020 Strategy which puts an emphasis on green jobs for a new sustainable economy; calls, in the interests of not adding to the insecurity experienced by women on the employment market, for family responsibilities to be taken into account when selecting employees for dismissal, bearing in mind that in many situations women have custody of children;
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 100 #

2010/2162(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets that the commitments assumed in Barcelona in 2002, targeting childcare, and fixing objectives until 2010, are far from being met; calls on the Council and the Member States to reconsider the above- mentioned objectives concerning childcare facilities; calls for accessibility to be improved, in particular through financial support for childcare, thus making it easier for the most disadvantaged women to pursue their occupation;
2010/12/16
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls for the development of a one- stop shop scheme to provide practical guidance, information and advice for those concerned, so as to ensure that the public is kept properly up to date; urges that this move towards simplification be brought to the attention of the public, the purpose being to reduce to the necessary minimum the amount of information requested;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2010/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers, with a view to this, that teleworking should be developed, wherever such working arrangements are possible, on the basis of ambitious legislation that reconciles the interests of workers and businesses;
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 38 #

2010/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that voluntary work performed by women should count as accredited professional experience, should be duly recognised and should not result in them being penalised in terms of sickness insurance and retirement pension entitlements;
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2010/2156(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to promote joint research between the cultural and creative industries and the education and training sector, so as to develop new learning concepts and facilitate the use of creativenew techniques and new creative tools in the educational sector;
2010/11/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on Member States to reduce excessive administrative costs and obstacles that hamper policy goals regarding access to employment, combating poverty and development of skills; recognises that ‘earmarking’ discipline has improved implementation of the programmes; calls for the role of the relevant authorities to be geared more towards the provision of information and advice, through the development of ‘one- stop’ facilities, if necessary, and by making the relevant legislation accessible to members of the public; calls for particular attention to be paid, in the course of checks carried out by social authorities, to ensuring that the procedures afford both sides a hearing; calls too, given the complexity of labour law, for recourse to dialogue rather than court proceedings in cases where a member of the public is – in good faith – in dispute with the authorities;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to boost the effectiveness of the ESF in guaranteeing opportunities for European citizens to make themselves employable and adaptable and in generating the conditions for sustainable growthand public profile of the ESF, thus making it more accessible, with a view to having more funds allocated to it for expanding access to the job market through the effective implementation of lifelong training to enable people to adapt to labour-demand changes in an era of globalisation and the computerisation of work, for introducing flexible working time and promoting part-time working and teleworking as means of getting more people into the job market, for generating the conditions for sustainable growth and for giving substance to the concept of social Europe, while paying particular attention to the situation of people with disabilities;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Bearing in mind that the ESF is a basic tool against poverty,for combating poverty by getting people into jobs, and for tackling social exclusion and unemployment, calls on the Commission to strengthen the ESF’s potential, and its financial autonomy and flexibility andin relation to the pursuit of economic and social cohesion, to make it more flexible so that current and future employment challenges can be addressed, to simplify procedures, and controls and to follow- up and controlsongoing projects more effectively;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that the Lisbon Strategy aims to integrate 60% of women able to work into the labour market, while efforts at the demographic level should strive to promote a rise in the birth rate with a view to meeting the challenges of the future;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses, however, that childcare must not be developed at the expense of a policy to develop parental leave; hopes therefore that, when a child is born, its parents will have a genuine choice between continuing to work and caring for their child; calls on Member States therefore to pursue ambitious policies on parental leave in order to give financial autonomy to those parents who so wish;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Considers that access to childcare services and services for the elderly and other dependent persons is vital if there is to be equal participation of women and men on the labour market and in education and training;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that employment rates for both men and women are lower in rural areas and this is to the detriment of the countryside in terms of lack of availability of quality jobs; in addition, many women are not part of the official labour market and therefore do not count as registered unemployed, and are thus faced with financial and legal problems regarding maternity rights, sick leave and acquisition of pension rights;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to defend social rights and to ensure that the economic and financial crisis does not lead to cuts in benefits or social services in the field of childcare and care of the elderly; stresses that policy on care and the provision of care services are closely bound up with achieving gender equality;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the Member States to promote entrepreneurship among women and to offer financial support and professional counselling to women starting up businesses, as well as appropriate training;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2010/2138(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Calls on the Member States to support employment for the disadvantaged category of 'pregnant women or mothers performing domestic tasks on their own', encouraging the provision of jobs for this group that are decent, stable and compatible with a proper work-life balance;
2010/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls, at the same time, on Member States to take measures to extend the threshold for female representation to administrative authorities and public- sector services;
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 55 #

2010/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
aa. initiating an annual debate with representatives of both sides of industry,
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 73 #

2010/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
da. precise and quantifiable commitments on the part of companies;
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 84 #

2010/2115(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Wishes, in the first instance, to develop the provision of information, consultation and voluntary commitments on the part of companies rather than penalties;
2011/03/28
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 2 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B (new)
(A) whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) does not impose any active labour market measures on a Member State that have to be implemented in the framework of an application for the fund but to put in place a coordinated package of personalised services designed to reintegrate workers into the labour market in accordance with Article 3 of the EGF regulation[1] which preserves fully the flexibility of the Member States to adapt the measures targeting the redundant workers to the local and individual needs of each application, ([1] Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2009 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund as amended by regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009.)
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds Member States of the importance of taking immediate labour market intervention measures in parallel with their application to the EGF;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls onReminds the Member States that they are obliged, on the one hand, to involve the social partners right from the outset in the task of preparing applications in accordance with Article 5 of the EGF regulation and, on the other hand, to comply with Article 9 of this regulation which requests Member States to provide information on and publicise the funded actions and that this information has also to be addressed to the workers concerned, the local and regional authorities and the social partners and to standardise procedures;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Council conclusions for New Skills for New Jobs and underlines that the EGF provides the Member States with additional funding for the training of redundant workers for future oriented jobs and increased mobility;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Asks the Commission to present a proposal on how the EGF regulation should be amended in order to allow the inclusion of all workers made redundant because of the same event, across sectors and regions;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to adopt a personalised approach to assistance for redundant workers, particularly in cases of large-scale redundancies, so as to improve workers' opportunities on a labour market that is undergoing profound restructuring; calls on the Member States and local authorities to do everything possible to revitalise places which have suffered from the impact of relocation in order to maintain economic activity in the area, bearing in mind that the EGF is geared solely to employees; to this end, recommends that the Member States step up their exchanges of good practice, especially making use of Progress;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States benefitting from the EGF to be very effective and to adopt a personalised approach to assistance for redundant workers, particularly in cases of large-scale redundancies, so as to improve workers' opportunities on a labour market that is undergoing profound restructuring; to this end, recommends that the Member States step up their exchanges of good practice, especially making use of Progress;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to use the EGF to implement European objectives, to promote new skills for new jobs, to promote entrepreneurship and to promote lifelong learning, so as to allow workers to develop their individual careers and to contribute to improving the competitiveness of the EU in the context of globalisation;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Reminds undertakings of their social responsibility to do all they can to ensure that workers can, right from the start of their period of unemployment, authenticate their experience acquired, so as to ensure that their retraining is as specific and as rapid as possible and that they obtain new, stable jobs with a promising future;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to provide the Member States with a set of guidelines for the design and the implementation of the applications for EGF funding seeking a fast application procedure and a broad consensus of the stakeholders for the strategy to apply and the measures to be put in place for an effective reintegration of the workers into the labour market;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Asks the Commission to provide assistance also to the Member States, the social partners and the workers associations during the process of implementation of the measures;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Requests the Commission to publish its data on the efficiency of use of the EGF and the success of measures after a longer period (≥ 1 year) in the interest of sound EU budgetary management, so as to allow Parliament to conduct an ex post control.
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that juvenile delinquency now also extends to dangerous games, gender violence, rape or gang rape, early sexualisation and exposure to pornography, for which the Internet has become a prime vehicle, abuse of substances which are smoked, drunk, or injecteddrug and alcohol abuse, and eating disorders, excesses of which teenagers can be both instigators and victims;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 44 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Agrees with the list of causes set out by the EESC: - a broken home and the difficulties in balancing family life and work, both of which increasingly often result in a lack of attention and an absence of constraints and control for children; - socioeconomic marginalisation or poverty; - truancy and academic failure; - youth unemployment; - the broadcasting of violent images and attitudes via some 1 European Economic and Social Committee, Opinion on The prevention of juvenile delinquency. Ways of dealing with juvenile delinquency and the role of the juvenile justice system in the European Union, OJ C 110, media or videogames; - abuse of drugs and toxic substances, such as cannabis, or even excessive alcohol consumption; - shortcomings in the teaching and passing on of social and civic values, such as obeying rules, solidarity, generosity, tolerance, respect for others, critical self- awareness, empathy, high standards of work, etc., which are being replaced in our ‘globalised’ societies by more utilitarian values like individualism, competitiveness or hyper-consumption, which in certain circumstances can generate a degree of detachment from society1;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the family is the first place where social interaction occurs for children and that an extended family circle plays a vital role in prevention and rehabilitation;social reintegration; also takes the view that other socio-economic factors play a role in influencing children’s development,
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Invites the Member States to improve teacher training, to promote cooperation between parents and, teachers, social mediators and youth associations, and to take young people’s views into account within the framework of the applicable rules;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 66 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Invites the Member States, local authorities and schools to encourage and organise extracurricular, artistic and sporting activities with help from community associations;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 71 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the competent bodies to assess the public policies concerning the effectiveness of alternative punishments for juvenile delinquents, the impact of gender stereotypes in youth crime, the role played by media, the different experiences of boys and girls in relation to violence, and the role played by parents, schools and youth organisassociations in preventing youth crime; calls on those bodies to compare their experiences and practices;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 82 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Member States to promote the adoption of measures aimed at providing counselling forsupporting children encountering social integration problems and combating discrimination against members of their community of origin, and action to draw up and implement programmes to combat all types of violence based on social origin;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 87 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. 20 Is convinced of the educational benefits of giving teenagers their say in order to avoid blind law-and-order policwith a view to addressing the problem of juvenile delinquency appropriately, as exemplified by the European project ‘Do you know where your child is now?’, as a means of prevention;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 101 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Invites the Member States and the social partners to organise appropriate vocational training courses and to increase wages in the early childhood and education sectors;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 103 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the institutions to reflect on the subject of the creation of national wealth through work in the home by women and men in order to ascertain whether this is a form of sex discrimination;deleted
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 108 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Member States to establish re-educational and social reintegration programmes for juvenile delinquents and to apply a ‘zero tolerance’ policy to adults, irrespective of their social status, who encourage teenagers to commit crimes, for example by helping them to obtain hard drugs, cannabis or other harmful substances;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 113 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Member States to step up their measures to prevent gender violence among young people and to improve collaboration between the individuals and milieus affected, such as the family, school, the public space and, the media and youth associations; underscores the importance of conducting campaigns to raise awareness of the various types of violence against women and of combating sexist stereotypes;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 121 #

2010/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the authorities to take the steps required to putenable women and men in a better position to choose how they wish to achieve work-life balance;
2011/09/02
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 48 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The growing proportion of older people in Europe and the consequent increase in chronic conditions makes it more important than ever to promote healthy ageing and develop initiatives to counter health risks associated with the ageing process, such as malnutrition. Healthy ageing can help raise labour market participation of older people, enable them to be active in society for longer, improve their individual quality of life and curb the strains on health and social care systems.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) to protect older persons who continue carrying on an activity, regardless of the category of organisation in which that activity is performed, via suitable medical monitoring;
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2009/2242(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas although the 2006-2010 Roadmap for equality has served to some extent to highlight key aspects of gender equality, actual progress has been modesis insufficient,
2010/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 23 #

2009/2242(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the current economic and social crisis ismay having particularly seriouse consequences for women, exacerbating inequalities and discriminationinter alia in relation to employment and pay,
2010/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2009/2242(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas those living in poverty – more than 85 million in all – are for the most part women, a situation brought about by unemployment, casual labour, low wages, pensions below the minimum subsistence level, and the widespread difficulties of obtaining access to good public services,
2010/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2009/2242(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas in terms of average wages there is a growing gender pay gap throughout the EU, amounting on average toof more than 17%, and whereas indirect forms of discrimination tend to increase when unemployment is rising and affecting women and girls,
2010/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2009/2242(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas 2010 is the European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion, a fact which has to be reflected in policies and concerted action aimed at bringing about real changes tothat genuinely help to improve the present situation,
2010/04/14
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that experience demonstratEmphasises that quality in SSGI provision should be based around a suitable financing method apt to ensure innovative and efficient services; stresses that the profit maximisation objective of commercial providers of SSGImust not conflicts with the principles and objectives of SSGI;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that national and local authorities engaged in providing or mandating SSGI need a clear legal basis for their services and expenditures, and that while the information and clarification service developed by the Commission is essential, it should be flanked with a methodology made available to the organis insufficient and does not protect SSGI providers from legal challengeg authorities and containing a grid for the application of the EU rules;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that SSGI are an indispensable investment for Europe’s future, and are under severe pressure due to the economic and banking crises and government austerity programmes, which are resulting in even greater demand for them;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Emphasises that the quality of services must be based around regular and integrated consultation of users, who are taxpayers, since services must first and foremost meet their needs;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for clarification of basic principles on the control of state aid, and for a review of the criteria for calculating compensation of public service obligations, with an eye to transparency vis-à-vis the taxpayer;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the 2005 Monti-Kroes response to the Altmark case to be broadened so as to simplify the rules, improve flexibility in their application, and expand the derogations. The de minimis threshold should beCalls on the Commission to assess whether it is appropriate to raised to at least EUR 500 000 over a three-year cyclehe de minimis threshold applicable to SSGI;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2009/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas mainstream economists have pointed out that the credit crunch, which started the recession, was quite literally a man-made disaster; whereas responses at state and international level – none of which awere not sufficiently gender-sensitinclusive – have also been decided upon mainly by men; whereas it is important that women, who are generally better qualified than men, be fully included in the decision-making process in the political, economic and financial spheres as well as social partners agreements,
2010/04/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 9 #

2009/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the European institutions and, the Member States and the local and regional authorities to take effective steps, notably through legislation, to encourage gender balance in corporate and political positions of responsibility, including on boards of directors, and in local, regional, national and European public institutions, administrations and organisations which should set an example; therefore calls for binding targets to ensure the equal representation of women and men;
2010/04/21
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2009/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas mainstream economists have pointed out that the credit crunch, which started the recession, was quite literally a man-made disaster; whereas responses at state and international level – none of which are gender-sensitive – have also been decided upon mainly by men; whereas it is important that women, who are generally better qualified than men, be fully included in the decision-making process in the political, economic and financial spheres,
2010/03/26
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 114 #

2009/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the European institutions and the Member States to take effective steps, notably through legislation, to encourage gender balance in corporate and political positions of responsibility, as well as in equivalent positions in public administrations, which should set an example; therefore calls for binding targets to ensure the equal representation of women and men;
2010/03/26
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 8 #

2009/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, while on average the health of EU citizens has steadily improved over the past decade, health disparities are still to be found in the Member States, in particular within different population groups and between men and women,
2010/02/03
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 63 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint a
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 3 – point a – paragraph 2
(a) point (a) 2, first sentence is deleted.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint a
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 3 – point a – paragraph 2
a) point (a) 2, first sentence is deleted. amended as follows:. "in the case of self-employed drivers, the same definition shall apply to the time from the beginning to the end of work – including a fixed period of working time calculated for points iv and v taken together – during which the self- employed driver is at his workstation, at the disposal of the client and exercising his functions or activities other than general administrative work that is not directly linked to the specific transport operation underway".
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint d
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point f
(d) point (f) is replaced by the following: "f) 'person performing mobile road transport activities’ shall mean any mobile worker who performs such activities;"deleted
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive2002/15/EC
Article 4 – point b a (new)
3a) The following point (ba) is inserted in Article 4: the fixed period of working time referred to in Article 3 (a) (2) shall be one hour per week.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL